Exhibit A - Pension Funding Policy Blackline

City of Chandler — Regular Meeting (2021-04-22)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 9449 characters
EXHIBIT A 
Page 1 of 4 
 
City of Chandler 
Pension Funding Policy  
Public Safety Personnel Retirement System and 
Arizona State Retirement System 
 
The intent of this policy is to clearly communicate the Council’s pension funding objectives, its 
commitment to our employees and the sound financial management of the City, and to 
comply with new statutory requirements of Laws 2018, Chapter 112, including reviewing and 
adopting this policy annually. 
 
The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) recommends the adoption of a pension 
funding policy that address three core elements: 
• 
Actuarial Cost Method – The technique used to allocate the total present value of future 
benefits over an employee’s working career (normal cost/service cost). 
• 
Asset Smoothing Method – The technique used to recognize gains or losses in pension 
assets over some period of time so as to reduce the effects of market volatility and 
stabilize contributions. 
• 
Amortization Policy – The length of time and the structure selected for increasing or 
decreasing contributions to systematically eliminate any unfunded actuarial accrued 
liability or surplus. 
 
In addition to the three core elements identified by the GFOA, this policy also addresses the 
Council’s position on: 
• 
Pension Funding Goal 
• 
Funding Pension Cost 
 
Several terms are used throughout this policy: 
 
Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) – The difference between trust assets and 
the estimated future cost of pensions earned by employees. The UAAL reflects the 
difference between actual results (interest earnings, member mortality, disability rates, 
etc.) and the assumptions used in previous actuarial valuations. 
 
Annual Required Contribution (ARC) – The annual amount required to pay into the 
pension funds, as determined through annual actuarial valuations. It is comprised of two 
primary components: normal pension cost (the estimated cost of pension benefits earned 
by employees in the current year) and amortization of UAAL (the cost needed to cover the 
unfunded portion of pensions earned by employees in previous years). The UAAL is 
collected over a period of time referred to as the amortization period. The ARC is a 
percentage of the current payroll. 
 
Funded Ratio – The ratio of fund assets to actuarial accrued liability. The higher the ratio, 
the better funded the pension, with 100% representing fully funded.

EXHIBIT A 
Page 2 of 4 
 
Intergenerational Equity – Ensures that no generation is burdened by substantially more 
or less pension costs than past or future generations. 
 
The City’s police and fire employees who are regularly assigned hazardous duty participate in 
the Public Safety Personnel Retirement System (PSPRS). All other eligible employees are 
covered by the Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS). 
 
Public Safety Personnel Retirement System (PSPRS) 
 
PSPRS is administered as an agent multiple-employer pension plan. An agent multiple-
employer plan has two main functions: 1) to comingle assets of all plans under its 
administration, thus achieving economy of scale for more cost efficient investments and 
investing those assets for the benefit of all members under its administration, and 2) to serve 
as the statewide uniform administrator for the distribution of benefits. 
 
Under an agent multiple-employer plan, each agency participating in the plan has an 
individual trust fund reflecting that agencies’ assets and liabilities. Under this plan, all 
contributions are deposited to and distributions are made from that trust fund’s assets, each 
trust fund has its own funded ratio and contribution rate, and each trust fund has a unique 
annual actuarial valuation. The City of Chandler has two trust funds, one for police employees 
and one for fire employees. 
 
The three core elements outlined by the GFOA guidance are addressed by the statewide 
PSPRS board and discussed in section G of the annual individual actuarial valuations, which 
can be found on the PSPRS website. http://www.psprs.com/investments--financials/annual-
reports 
 
Council formally accepts the assets, liabilities, and current funding ratio of the City’s PSPRS 
trust funds for Tier 1 and Tier 2 members from the June 30, 20192020 actuarial valuation, 
which are detailed below. 
 
Trust Fund 
Assets 
Accrued 
Liability 
Unfunded 
Actuarial Accrued 
Liability 
Funded 
Ratio 
Chandler Police 
 $163,495,339 
 $281,104,973 
 
$117,609,634 
58.2% 
Chandler Fire 
 
106,619,514 
 169,512,224 
 
62,892,710 
62.9% 
City of Chandler 
Totals 
 $270,114,853 
 $450,617,197 
 
$180,502,344 
59.9% 
Trust Fund 
Assets 
Accrued 
Liability 
Unfunded 
Actuarial Accrued 
Liability 
Funded 
Ratio 
Chandler Police 
 $192,743,535 
 $307,211,347 
 
$114,467,812 
62.7% 
Chandler Fire 
 
123,776,647 
 180,448,891 
 
56,672,244 
68.6% 
City of Chandler 
Totals 
 $316,520,183 
 $487,660,238 
 
$171,140,056 
64.9%

EXHIBIT A 
Page 3 of 4 
 
 
 
PSPRS Funding Goal 
 
Pensions that are less than fully funded place the cost of service provided in earlier periods 
(amortization of UAAL) on the current taxpayers. Fully funded pension plans are the best way 
to achieve taxpayer and member intergenerational equity. Most funds in PSPRS are 
significantly underfunded and fall well short of the goal of intergenerational equity. 
 
The Council’s PSPRS funding ratio goal is to achieve 100% (fully funded) by June 30, 2036, 
and reduce the annual employer contribution. Council established this goal for the 
following reasons: 
 
 
• 
The PSPRS trust funds represent only the City of Chandler’s liability. 
• 
The fluctuating cost of an UAAL causes strain on the City’s budget, affecting our ability 
to maintain, enhance, or add new services in the future. 
• 
A fully funded pension is the best way to achieve taxpayer and member 
intergenerational equity. 
 
Council has taken the following actions to achieve this goal: 
 
• 
The City chose the 20-year amortization period instead of the 30-year one-time option, 
did not defer the Fields case (paid the full employer contribution rate increase in one 
year versus spreading over 3 years), and did not take advantage of PSPRS’s credit 
service model option related to the Parker case to apply toward future retirement 
payments when refunding excess employee contributions. 
• 
The City pays the full estimated employer contribution at the beginning of the Fiscal 
Year versus paying the actual amount through bi-weekly payrolls, allowing PSPRS to 
invest at a higher rate thereby increasing the amount of interest applied towards the 
City’s UAAL. 
• 
The City maintains the ARC payment from operating revenues – Council is committed 
to maintaining the full ARC payment (normal cost and UAAL amortization) from 
operating funds. The estimated combined ARC for FY 2019-202020-21 is WAS $18.419.9 
million and FY 2020-212021-22 is approximately $19.919.6 million and will be able to 
be paid from operating funds without diminishing City services. 
• 
The City will commit additional payments above the ARC to achieve reduced ARC 
payments in the future. This projected additional payment to lower long term costs 
may be adjusted annually based on the updated UAAL, economic environment, and 
available General Fund one-time funds. 
o Additional payments to date total $3752.5 million and include - $2.5 million in 
FY 2016-17, $5 million in FY 2017-18, $5 million in FY 2018-19, and $25 MILLION 
in FY 2019-20, AND $15 MILLION IN FY 2020-21. 
o The additional payment planned in FY 2020-212021-22 is $1522 million, and will 
be held until COVID-19 impacts are known. The prior year’s budget compared to

EXHIBIT A 
Page 4 of 4 
 
actual expenditures and updated UAAL will be reviewed annually and the 
excess payment will be adjusted accordingly. 
 
Based on these actions, the Council’s current plan is to achieve its goal of 100% funding by 
June 30, 2036, make additional payments early to save ongoing costs in future years, all while 
meeting the timeline set forth by the PSPRS June 30, 20192020, actuarial valuation. The pay-
down plan will be reviewed annually. 
 
Funding PSPRS Pension Cost 
 
It is the Council’s policy that funding of the ARC from operating revenues will be a priority 
during the annual budget process before other service enhancements are considered. 
 
Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) 
 
ASRS is administered as a cost-sharing multiple-employer pension plan. This means that all 
agencies statewide are part of the same trust which is administered by a single administrator. 
In this type of pension, the funded ratio and contribution rates are the same for all 
participating entities. The City of Chandler’s proportionate share comprises approximately 
0.7672% of the total system. 
The three core elements outlined by the GFOA guidance are addressed by the statewide ASRS 
board and discussed in appendix III of the annual actuarial valuation, which can be found on 
the ASRS website. https://www.azasrs.gov/content/annual-reports 
 
ASRS Funding Goal 
 
Since the ASRS trust fund is comprised of all participating agencies, there is no ability for the 
City of Chandler to address or influence its individual funded ratio. 
 
Funding ASRS Pension Cost 
 
It is the Council’s policy that funding of the ARC from operating revenues will be a priority 
during the annual budget process before other service enhancements are considered.