Development Booklet

City of Chandler — Regular Meeting (2021-05-13)

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 43147 characters

McKinley
Glenn
PAD and Preliminary
Development Plan
Narrative
A 9-acre community located at the southwest
corner of 130th Street and Chandler Heights
Road
City of Chandler
First Submittal: November 20, 2020
Second Submittal: February 2, 2021
Third Submittal: March 4, 2021
Final Submittal: April 26, 2021
Case: PLH20-0063

Development Team

RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture
Alex Stedman
120 South Ash Avenue
Tempe, AZ 85281
Phone: (480) 994-0994
astedman@rviplanning.com

Rick Engineering
Chris Patton, P.E.
22415 North 16th Street
Phoenix, AZ 85024
Phone: (602) 957-3350
cpatton@rickengineering.com

Developer, Cachet Homes
Ron Homyak
10446 N 74th Street #220
Scottsdale, AZ 85258
rhomyak@cachethomes.net

Table of Contents
1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1
2.
Purpose of Request .................................................................................................................................. 1
3.
Existing Site Conditions ............................................................................................................................ 1
Existing Zoning .............................................................................................................................................................. 2
Proposed zoning ............................................................................................................................................................ 2
General Plan Designation .............................................................................................................................................. 2
Southeast Chandler Area Plan ...................................................................................................................................... 2
4.
Development Plan Concept ..................................................................................................................... 3
Proposed PAD Development Standards ....................................................................................................................... 4
Support for Proposed PAD Standards ...................................................................................................................... 4
5.
Subdivision Diversity Standards ............................................................................................................... 5
6.
Grading and Drainage .............................................................................................................................. 8
7.
Utilities ..................................................................................................................................................... 8
8.
Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................ 8
Exhibits
Exhibit A: Context Aerial
Exhibit B: General Plan Map
Exhibit C: Existing Zoning Map
Exhibit D: Proposed Zoning After Annexation Map
Exhibit E: Conceptual Site Plan
Exhibit F: Preliminary Development Plan
Exhibit G: Landscape Plan
Exhibit H: Amenity Elevation
Exhibit I: Wall Plan
Exhibit J: Wall and Monument Details
Exhibit K: Parking Analysis

P a g e | 1

1. Introduction
RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture, on behalf of Cachet Homes, is pleased to submit this rezoning and
preliminary development plan application for McKinley Glenn. The community is proposed as a single-
family residential neighborhood on an approximate 9-acre vacant property located within Unincorporated
Maricopa County at the southwest corner of 130th St. and Chandler Heights Road. The proposed rezoning
request would run concurrently with an Annexation request to bring the subject property into the City of
Chandler, and rezone from the current RU-43 County zoning district to PAD. The development proposal
would allow for a 22-lot gated subdivision with access from Chandler Heights Road.

2. Purpose of Request
The Applicant requests the following from the City of Chandler:

1. Annexation of the subject property into the City of Chandler (Separate application)
2. Rezoning from AG-1 (zoning upon annexation) to PAD for single-family residential and approval
of a Preliminary Development Plan (PDP)

The property owner is requesting annexation into the City of Chandler due to the unique location of the
site and with the assumption that the City of Chandler would provide public utilities and other municipal
services to the site. After review of the annexation requirements per A.R.S. 9-471, this project conforms
with Arizona law that requires “a territory to be annexed shall adjoin the boundary of the annexing city or
town for at least 300 feet”. Since the subject property exists in a County island, the proposed annexation
would not create a new county island as defined by A.R.S.

The rezoning and PDP application is proposed to run concurrently with the Annexation application.
McKinley Glenn’s housing product will be provided under a separate PDP submittal and shall address the
Architectural Diversity Guideline as required by the zoning ordinance. It is the intent of the McKinley Glenn
PAD that housing product will coordinate with the project themes as well as with the surrounding
communities.

3. Existing Site Conditions
Until recently, the subject site was in use for agricultural production as a pecan orchard with a single existing
home on the property. The site is generally flat and does currently utilize flood irrigation. An open irrigation
conveyance channel extends across the site’s Chandler Heights frontage, and a single driveway is located
at the northeast corner. The site is accessed from Chandler Heights Road and lies at the southwest corner
of 130th Street and Chandler Heights Road. The site is surrounded by a combination of rural residential
properties and single family residential communities.
Table 1: Surrounding Land Uses
Direction
General Plan Land Use
Existing Zoning
Existing Use
Property
Neighborhoods
RU-43 (County)
Vacant
North
Neighborhoods
PAD (City of Chandler)
Single Family Residential,
Countryside Estates
East
Neighborhoods
PAD (City of Chandler)
Single Family Residential,
Hawthorn Manor
South
Neighborhoods
RU-43 (County)
Large Lot Residential

P a g e | 2

Existing Zoning
The current zoning of the property is RU-43 in unincorporated Maricopa County. This zoning is for larger
lots 43,560 sq.ft. and above. Immediately to the east is the Hawthorn Manor subdivision which is zoned
PAD with typical single-family lot sizes of 10,000+ square feet. To the north is Countryside Estates which is
also zoned PAD with typical single-family lot sizes of 10,000+ square feet. There are three residential parcels
immediately to the west zoned RU-43 in unincorporated Maricopa County and one parcel zoned RU-43 to
the east of the site with frontage to Chandler Heights Road. To the south are three parcels in
unincorporated Maricopa County zoned RU-43.

Proposed zoning
Upon Annexation, the site will be briefly modified to assume the City’s closest equivalent zoning designation
which is the AG-1 district. The proposed zoning request seeks to modify the zoning to PAD for single-family
residential with development standards that are closely equivalent to the City’s SF-10 Single Family district.
The proposed zoning will be comparable with approved zoning, single family use types, and the density
established in the adjacent PAD communities to the north and east.

General Plan Designation
The Chandler General Plan 2016 identifies this site as Neighborhood which allows for a range of residential
densities as well as a variety of non-residential uses. The General Plan further recommends low-density
residential (2.5-3.5 dwellings units per acre) in areas adjacent to rural and large lot subdivisions. McKinley
Glenn provides a transition from the neighborhoods to the north and the east as the layout and lot sizes
are compatible to the surrounding existing developments.

Southeast Chandler Area Plan
The Project is also within the Southeast Chandler Area Plan (SECAP), which depicts the site as Rural/Agrarian
Character allows for residential subdivisions up to 3.5 du/ac with qualifying community amenities. The
proposed development is 2.4 du/ac net which is under the identified density threshold for the requirement
of community amenities within residential developments between 2.5 du/ac and up to 3.5 du/ac.
Regardless of size, the SECAP requires compliance with the number of PAD development standards to
which the proposed development will comply with.

Table 2: SECAP PAD Development Standards
Southeast Chandler Area Plan – PAD Development Standards
SECAP Standard
Proposed McKinley Glenn PAD
1. On average, provide 45’ wide landscape
setback along arterials. Provide street tree
plantings and landscaping (in conformance
with the SEC arterial landscape palette)
including turf where possible.
The proposed development will provide at
minimum 45’ wide landscape setback measured
from the back of the curb along Chandler Heights
road. Street trees will be planted in accordance
with the SECAP along the arterial roadway and all
retention basins will be landscaped.
2. Use subdivision design techniques that reduce
the number of houses backing up to arterial
streets. Lots backing onto arterial streets
should occupy no more than 50 percent of the
lineal area along the perimeter.
The proposed development is accessed from an
arterial roadway (Chandler Heights Road), but no
lots within the community are proposed to back to
the arterial street. Alternatively, a large open
West
Neighborhoods
RU-43 (County)
Large Lot Residential

P a g e | 3

space tract will be dedicated along the full frontage
of the community.
3. Provide staggers or breaks in perimeter fence
walls adjoining arterial streets. Openings in
perimeter fence walls should include rural
character open-view fencing. Solid walls shall
contain material changes, and be staggered at
least every 100 ft.
The wall design of the subdivision accentuates the
rural/agrarian characteristics outlined in the SECAP
and is proposed to be in general conformance with
the plan. The perimeter walls contain various
design elements in accordance with the standard
including partial and full view fence and columns
provided along the wall plan across the frontage of
the site. The proposed primary entryway 100%
view fencing was selected with the surrounding
neighborhoods Hawthorn Manor and Countryside
Estates which contain a similar design. The wall
materials and columns provided along the wall
plane are also similar to the design characteristics
of the adjacent communities.
4. Provide rural character entry features from
arterial streets.
The entry monument and design will contain a
large number of the character elements outlined in
the SECAP and has been designed to be in
conformance with the plan. These design elements
include a rustic wood finished sign, rustic tubular
steel trellis, Coronado split face stone, and painted
smooth face block.
5. Provide four-sided elevations displaying three
distinctive elevation styles per floor plan.
While the housing product is not a part of the
PAD/PDP submittal, the housing architecture will
be in general conformance with the provisions
outlined in the SECAP.

The proposed development will convey a rural/agrarian theme and be developed with transitions and
compatibility in mind as outlined in the SECAP. As outlined in the table above, the proposed development
meets and exceeds all the required PAD Development Standards outlined.

4. Development Plan Concept
The proposed McKinley Glenn community will be a gated, 22-lot subdivision with a minimum lot sizes in
excess of 10,000 sq.ft. The proposed typical lot sizes will be approximately 78’x 135’ in width and depth. All
homes within the community will be limited to single story. Primary access to the site will be off Chandler
Heights Road which will be coordinated with the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Chandler
Heights Road project. Larger side yard setbacks will be provided in instances where the proposed homes
will directly side on to existing homes to the east and west.

The proposed plan will include an entry feature that creates a sense of arrival into the development which
will provide security and a luxury feel as residents enter the community into a looped private street system.
Open space and retention are provided at the north of the site along Chandler Heights Road to provide a
buffer to the arterial roadway.

Open space and retention is provided at the north of the site along Chandler Heights Road and amenities
will be designed for use by the residents. The proposed landscaping will include a street lined tree
appearance in accordance with the SECAP and the City of Chandlers landscaping requirements. All

P a g e | 4

retention basins will be landscaped in accordance with City standards. A minimum of 15% of common open
space is provided throughout the subdivision.

Proposed PAD Development Standards
The following table provides the proposed development standards. The proposed development standards
were modeled after the SF-10 zoning district which is the closest comparable district to the proposed PAD.

Table 3: Proposed PAD Development Standards
Development Standard
City of Chandler
SF-10 District
Proposed PAD
Min. Lot Area
10,000 sq. ft.
10,000 sq. ft.
Min. Lot Width
90’
78’
Min. Lot Depth
100’
135’
Max. Lot Area
40%
50%
Max. Building Height
25’
25’, 1-story
Front Yard Setback (1)
20’
10’
Rear Yard Setback
15’
20’
Side Yard Setback (2,3)
5’ and 10’
5’, cumulative of 15’

(1) 20’ from back of sidewalk to front of face of the garage; 10’ to side loaded garage or livable area
(2) The combined total feet of both side yards shall not be less than fifteen (15) feet
(3) Lots 15 and 22 shall provide side yards not less than 15’ where adjacent to perimeter of the site

Support for Proposed PAD Standards

1. Min. Lot Width. The proposed PAD minimum lot width is proposed as 78’ due to the parcel shape
and size. At this width, it allows for a looped street design system and the ability to restrict the
placement of lots along Chandler Heights Road. The proposed development is situated in a way
that maximizes the width of the property. Additionally, to help account for the reduction in lot
width, the lot depth is increased to provide greater area in the backyards of each lot.
2. Lot Coverage. These requests are supported by the Property’s location and zoning transitions, and
by the larger lot depths that exceed standards and to enhance the quality of housing in all the
zoning categories. The proposed lot coverage also allows more opportunities for work-at-home
space and onsite amenities such as set-back garages, patios, and accessory structures. This will
help create additional opportunities for project designers to blend interior space with exterior
areas, which will add value to properties. Additionally, the proposed lot coverage is necessary to
allow for reasonably sized homes which are all expected to be single-story, thus taking up a greater
percentage of the lot.

In review of the surrounding neighborhoods, the proposed lot development standards of McKinley Glenn
are consistent with other approved community standards in the area. Countryside estates to the north is
zoned PAD with a minimum lot dimension of 80’x125’ and minimum lot size of 10,000 sq. ft. To the east,
the existing Chandler Heights PAD lot dimensions are 80’x135’ with a minimum lot size of 10,000 sq. ft. The
proposed development is consistent with the surrounding developments and the SF-10 zoning district.

P a g e | 5

5. Subdivision Diversity Standards
The purpose of the Residential Guidelines for Planned Area Developments is to achieve greater diversity
within new residential developments relative to lot sizes, subdivision layout, and single-family architecture,
by virtue of creativity, amenity, and diversity. Section 1 of the Residential Development Standards identifies
the conditions to which the Residential Standards apply to subdivisions throughout the City. As it relates to
the proposed development, one of the provision’s within Section 1 states:

“If all of the lots, either in a single parcel or within any unit of a multi-parcel PAD, are 10,000 sq. ft.
and greater, none of the diversity standards in Section I shall be required.”

While technically exempt from Section 1 of the Residential Design Standards due to the proposed lots in
excess of the 10,000 sq.ft. threshold, the proposed development will include and meet a vast majority of
the subdivision diversity standards to ensure the development is consistent with the quality and style seen
throughout the City and surrounding developments. The following table outlines all the provisions that are
being met with the proposed development as they relate to the City’s design standards.

Table 4: Residential Design Standards – Subdivision Diversity Elements
City Design Element
Proposed PAD
Required: 8 design elements
Total Provided: 5 out of 8
1. Sense of neighborhood arrival
The
proposed
development
is
a
gated
community which will have a decorative entry
built around to the subdivision using a
combination of walls, monumentation, theming,
and landscaping to create a sense of arrival.
2. Distinctive project themes
This project falls within the SECAP area and will
include rural/agrarian features in accordance
with the plan. The development will be themed
using a combination of different design elements
in a way that is consistent with the surrounding
area and vision of the SECAP.
3. Vehicular access to rear yards
Not applicable.
4. Deeper rear yard setbacks – 30 ft. 2-story
All homes are proposed as single-story homes.
5. Irregular shaped retention basins, max. 4:1 slope
Not applicable.
6. Design and improve retention areas to be useable
and accessible
A proposed amenity exists in the retention area
located internally on the north of the site and has
been designed to be usable and ADA accessible.
This area also includes landscaping, seating, and
a ramada providing an enjoyable amenity area
for the residents of the subdivision.
7. Provide a minimum 10-foot landscape parkway
from r-o-w line to fence in a common area when lots
back onto an arterial street and 5 feet when backed
to a local or collector
A landscape parkway will be included with the
Chandler Heights Road CIP improvements. The
ROW design includes a sidewalk and landscape
planting area between the back of curb and the
detached sidewalk. Additionally, a pedestrian
portal is included at the NW corner of the site
which helps create a prominent entry character.
The retention area is included behind the

P a g e | 6
perimeter wall along Chandler Heights road and
will be designed at 4:1 slope and will provide a
usable space including cornhole boards, planter
areas, a ramada, and seating areas for residents.
No trails are identified by the City along the
width of the property.
8. Provide staggers or other visual breaks in
perimeter fence walls adjoining arterial streets
Perimeter fencing will provide a combination of
undulation, columns, and different materials to
meet the City’s standards and the rural/agrarian
standards outlined in the SECAP. View fencing
has been included near the primary entry way
and centrally located near the amenity that
enables views into the community in compliance
with the SECAP.
Optional Elements (Minimum Required – 10 Points):
Total Provided: 8 points
1. Provide a curvilinear street system
Not applicable.
2. Provide a number of cul-de-sacs with a diversity
feature
Not applicable.
3. Provide view fencing along arterial and collector
streets
The proposed development will include a
combination of materials which meet the intent
of the SECAP. These materials include split face
block columns designed at min. 2’ x 2’ width and
depth with a precast concrete cap, smooth face
block,
and
tubular
steel
view
fencing.
Additionally, 2’ view fence panels will be placed
on 4’ solid wall along the Chandler Heights
Perimeter wall near the center of the site.
4. Provide wider side yards on at least 50% of lots
dispersed throughout the subdivision – not less than
20 feet combined width. 15-foot side yard on each
side of a 2-story home
Not applicable.
5. Group wider side yards on adjoining lot or arrange
lots in another fashion to add diversity
Not applicable.
6. Provide different lot widths (at least 5-ft.
differential)
The proposed development will include varying
setbacks with the minimum side yard setbacks
being 5’. No side yard setback shall be less than
5’ and the total of both side yards shall not be
less
than
15’.
The
staggered
layout
throughout the subdivision is meant to add
variety and character to
the
proposed
development in accordance with the City’s
residential design standards.
7. Widen corner lots by at least 10 feet more than
interior lots on same block or include a 10-foot wide
landscape tract on the street side of the lot
Since the proposed subdivision is to be private,
the proposed development will include a
minimum 9’ tract on the street side of the lot to
better accommodate guest parking on the east
side street. The walls at the end of the streets will
be decorative and the tract will include

P a g e | 7

landscaping consistent with the overall theme of
the subdivision.
8. Orient building envelope on corner lots to be
angled rather than parallel with side property lines
Not applicable.
9. Provide a mix of garage orientations
Multiple floor plan and elevation styles will be
provided which will deemphasize the garage
dominance. The subdivision will create variety
through the lot fit analysis to ensure this
provision is met.
10. Stagger the front yard setback to achieve a range
of 6 feet or more; minimum 18 feet from front facing
garage to the property line
In addition to the mix of garage orientations, a
combination of livable space and front porches
to further reduce garage dominance will be
provided. In some instances, the front face of the
home or porch may be approximately 5’ away
from the front face of the garage.
11. Stagger the rear setback lines for all lots backing
onto an arterial street by 10 feet or more (no rear
yard setback to be less than 20 feet for 1-story and
30 feet for 2-story).
Not applicable. No lots are proposed to back
onto an arterial roadway.
12. Provide landscape open spaces visible from
arterial street and residential street view with
maximum 4:1 slopes along street frontages
The proposed developed reserves approximately
100’ of landscape and retention along the
Chandler Heights arterial roadway. Additionally,
no homes will back onto Chandler Heights road
which will further emphasize the street lined
landscaping appearance as well as usable open
space outside of the community walls along
Chandler Heights.
13. Within a multi-parcel PAD, provide a differential
of at least 2,000 sq. ft. between the minimum lot size
of two (2) or more parcels
Not applicable.
14. Credit for another element may be granted
within the multi-parcel PAD if the lot size differential
results in a parcel with a minimum lot size of 12,000
sq. ft.
Not applicable.
15. Provide common area lakes by use of reclaimed
wastewater. (Counts as two points).
Not applicable.
16. Provide common are lakes visible from streets or
common areas with recreational features. (Counts as
two points).
Not applicable.
17. Provide a 38% maximum lot coverage on at least
50% of the total lots, 42% maximum lot coverage on
at least 25% of lots with the balance of the lots in a
subdivision not to exceed 45% lot coverage
Not applicable.
18. Provide a minimum 30-foot total side yard
setback width between homes for at least 50% of the
total lots distributed throughout the subdivision
Not applicable.
19. Locate a continuous enlarged landscape tract at
least ½ the total frontage in length along the arterial
The proposed development will provide a large
landscape tract at least ½ the total frontage

P a g e | 8

or collector streets with a depth equal to the average
lot depth and no more than 5 lots backing up to the
tract. Landscape areas not to include solid walls
creating a visual barrier
length along Chandler Heights Road and no
homes are proposed to back up to the tract.
Landscaping is provided along Chandler Heights
Road in accordance with the SECAP and Chandler
Heights CIP project. Additional landscaping will
be provided at the primary entrance that will be
visible from the arterial roadway.
20. Provide a minimum 20-foot landscape parkway
along arterial streets, measured from the r-o-w line
to the fence
A minimum 20’ landscaping/retention tract
measured from the r-o-w line to the fence will be
provided along Chandler Heights Road.
21. Any other subdivision feature not listed.
All homes will be constructed as single-story
which will create a comfortable transition to
neighboring developments.
Total Points: (Minimum Required 8 + 10 optional
points)
5 + 8 = 13 points

6. Grading and Drainage
The subject site is relatively flat with an elevation difference of roughly 1-foot from east to west. As shown
on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Fold Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), map number
04013 C3106M, with a current effective date of November 14, 2015, the site falls within Flood Zone X. Zone
X is defined as:

•
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depth less than
one foot or with drainage areas of less than one square mile.

A retention basin will be constructed to retain the 100-year, 2-hour storm sized at 110% of the design
volume and provide active and passive use for residents.

7. Utilities
All utilities such as fire, police, and emergency medical services, water and wastewater services, solid waste
and trash collection services are proposed to be through the City of Chandler government. Further review
is being conducted to evaluate the opportunity to utilize reclaimed water on the north side of Chandler
Heights Road to irrigate the basin and open space tracts. Other utility services include:

Electricity: Provided by SRP
Gas: Provided by Southwest Gas
Communications: Provided by Century Link / Cox Communications

8. Conclusion
McKinley Glenn will be well integrated with the surrounding areas and will be a positive addition to the
improved Chandler Heights Road streetscape. The proposed development creates a distinct residential
community that adds to the character and quality of the surrounding area. The proposed PAD and PDP are
consistent with the City’s General Plan and are complementary and compatible with the surrounding area.
McKinley Glenn is a subdivision that will provide an attractive presence in the area, providing additional,
diverse housing choices. We respectfully request the approval of the Annexation, PAD, and PDP.

SITE
SITE
SITE
SITE
SITE
SITE
SITE
SITE
SITE
SITE
SITE
SITE
SITE
SITE
SITE
SITE
SITE
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
(PAD)
(PAD)
(PAD)
(PAD)
(PAD)
(PAD)
(PAD)
(PAD)
(PAD)
(PAD)
(PAD)
(PAD)
(PAD)
(PAD)
(PAD)
(PAD)
(PAD)
HAWTHORN MANOR
(PAD)
HAWTHORN MANOR
(PAD)
HAWTHORN MANOR
(PAD)
HAWTHORN MANOR
(PAD)
HAWTHORN MANOR
(PAD)
HAWTHORN MANOR
(PAD)
HAWTHORN MANOR
(PAD)
HAWTHORN MANOR
(PAD)
HAWTHORN MANOR
(PAD)
HAWTHORN MANOR
(PAD)
HAWTHORN MANOR
(PAD)
HAWTHORN MANOR
(PAD)
HAWTHORN MANOR
(PAD)
HAWTHORN MANOR
(PAD)
HAWTHORN MANOR
(PAD)
HAWTHORN MANOR
(PAD)
HAWTHORN MANOR
(PAD)
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES
(PAD)
COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES
(PAD)
COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES
(PAD)
COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES
(PAD)
COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES
(PAD)
COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES
(PAD)
COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES
(PAD)
COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES
(PAD)
COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES
(PAD)
COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES
(PAD)
COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES
(PAD)
COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES
(PAD)
COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES
(PAD)
COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES
(PAD)
COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES
(PAD)
COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES
(PAD)
COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES
(PAD)
CREEKWOOD
RANCH
(SF-10)
CREEKWOOD
RANCH
(SF-10)
CREEKWOOD
RANCH
(SF-10)
CREEKWOOD
RANCH
(SF-10)
CREEKWOOD
RANCH
(SF-10)
CREEKWOOD
RANCH
(SF-10)
CREEKWOOD
RANCH
(SF-10)
CREEKWOOD
RANCH
(SF-10)
CREEKWOOD
RANCH
(SF-10)
CREEKWOOD
RANCH
(SF-10)
CREEKWOOD
RANCH
(SF-10)
CREEKWOOD
RANCH
(SF-10)
CREEKWOOD
RANCH
(SF-10)
CREEKWOOD
RANCH
(SF-10)
CREEKWOOD
RANCH
(SF-10)
CREEKWOOD
RANCH
(SF-10)
CREEKWOOD
RANCH
(SF-10)
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
0
150'
300'
SCALE: 1" = 300'-0"
McKINLEY GLENN
EXHIBIT A • CONTEXT AERIAL

CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
0
150'
300'
SCALE: 1" = 300'-0"
McKINLEY GLENN
EXHIBIT C • EXISTING ZONING PRE-ANNEXATION

CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD
0
150'
300'
SCALE: 1" = 300'-0"
McKINLEY GLENN
EXHIBIT D • PROPOSED ZONING AFTER ANNEXATION
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
COOPER RD
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
CITY OF CHANDLER
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
SITE
PAD
SITE
PAD
SITE
PAD
SITE
PAD
SITE
PAD
SITE
PAD
SITE
PAD
SITE
PAD
SITE
PAD
SITE
PAD
SITE
PAD
SITE
PAD
SITE
PAD
SITE
PAD
SITE
PAD
SITE
PAD
SITE
PAD
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
PAD
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY
RU-43
COUNTY

2
3
4
5
6
7
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
EXHIBIT E • CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
LEGEND
NET ACREAGE:
PROPOSED ZONING:
# OF LOTS:
NET DENSITY:
TYP. LOT SIZE:
OPEN SPACE:
9.0AC.
PAD
22
2.4 DU/AC
78'X135'
15 % of Net Site Area
*ALL HOMES TO BE ONE STORY
VICINITY MAP
OCOTILLO ROAD
CHANDLER HEIGHTS
,_SITE
ROAD

UJ
UJ
RIGGS ROAD
Table 1: Proposed PAD Development Standards
Development Standard
Proposed PAD
Min. Lot Area
10,000 s . ft.
Min. Lot Width
78'
Min. Lot De th
135'
Max. Lot Area
50%
Max. Buildin Hei ht
25', 1-sto
Front Yard Setback 111
10'
Rear Yard Setback
20'
Side Yard Setback 12.3J
5', cumulative of 15'
(1) 20' from back of sidewalk to front of face of the garage;
10' to side loaded garage or livable area
(2) The combined total feet of both side yards shall not be
less than fifteen (15} feet
(3) Lots 15 and 22 shall provide side yards not less than 15'
where adjacent to perimeter of the site
A
a
75•
150•
..

SCALE: 1"" = 150"-0""

2
3
4
5
6
7
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
EXHIBIT G • CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN
PLANT PALETTE
CHANDLER HEIGHTS STREET TREES
BOTANICAL NAME
Fraxinus velutina 'Rio Grande'
Pinus eldarica
INTERNAL SITE TREES
BOTANICAL NAME
Fraxinus velutina 'Rio Grande'
Parkinsonia X 'Desert Museum'
Pistacia chinensis 'Red Push'
Pinus eldarica
Caesalpinia X 'Sierra Sun'
Platanus wrightii
Prosopis X 'AZT'
Quercus virginiana 'Heritage'
SHRUBS/ ACCENTS/ CACTI
BOTANICAL NAME
Dodonae viscosa
Tecoma s. 'Gold Star'
Leucophyllum I. 'Lynn's Legacy'
Leucophyllum z. 'Cimarron'
Eremophila maculata 'Valentine'
Eremophila hygrophana
Hesperaloe p. 'Brake Lights'
Muhlenbergia c. 'Regal Mist'
Muhlenbergia e. 'El Toro'
Russellia equisetiformis
GROUNDCOVER
BOTANICAL NAME
Baccharis X 'Starn' Thompson
Bougainvillea 'Monka'
Eremophila g. 'Mingenew Gold'
Lantana 'New Gold'
Rosmarinus o. 'Huntington Carpet'
COMMON NAME
Fan-Tex Ash
Mondell Pine
COMMON NAME
Fan-Tex Ash
Desert Museum Palo Verde
Red Push Pistache
Mondell Pine
Hybrid Mexican Bird-of-Paradise
Arizona Sycamore
Thornless Hybrid Mesquite
Heritage Live Oak
COMMON NAME
Hopbush
Gold Star Yellow Bells
Lynn's Legacy Sage
Blue Ranger
Valentine Emu Bush
Blue Bells Emu Bush
Brake Lights Red Yucca
Regal Mist Muhly
Bull Grass
Coral Fountain
COMMON NAME
Dwarf Coyote Bush
Ooh-La-La Bougainvillea
Outback Sunrise Emu
New Gold Lantana
Trailing Rosemary
LANDSCAPE KEYNOTES
0 9.5' LANDSCAPE TRACT
0 DETACHED SIDEWALK
0 MONUMENT SIGN
0 PASSIVE OPEN SPACE/ RETENTION
0 ENTRY PORTAL
0 PERIMETER THEME WALL
0 GATED ENTRY
0 SIDEWALK
0 AMENITY (RAMADA, SEATING, CORNHOLE)
@ MAIL CLUSTER BOX
A
a
a·
1sa·
..

SCALE: 1 "" = 190"-0""

0
60'
120'
SCALE: 1" = 120'-0"
McKINLEY GLENN
EXHIBIT H • CONCEPTUAL WALL PLAN
LEGEND
THEME WALL
DOOLEY WALL
EXISTING WALL
6'-0" DOOLEY WALL ON 2'-0"
MAX. RETAINING WALL
100% VIEW FENCE
33% VIEW WALL
THEME WALL ENHANCEMENT
ENTRY MONUMENT
DECORATIVE COLUMN

ADAAC CESIBLE
RAMP INTO
AME NITY AREA
I EXHIBIT I. AMENITY ELEVATION I
75'-0"
(W ID TH VARIES)
R.O.W.
14'-0"
6'-0"
IR RIGATION
LANDSCAPE
ESMT.
35'-0"
B/C TO WALL

McKINLEY GLENN
EXHIBIT J • WALL DETAILS
NOTE: BLOCKS AND STEEL TO BE PAINTED.

McKINLEY GLENN
EXHIBIT J • WALL DETAILS
NOTE: RENDERINGS ARE FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
STREET A
STREET C
STREET D
STREET B
0
50'
100'
SCALE: 1" = 100'-0"
McKINLEY GLENN
EXHIBIT K • PARKING ANALYSIS
SITE DATA
NET BOUNDARY
NET AREA:
9.0 AC (+/-)
PROPOSED ZONING:
PAD
22
2.4 DU/AC
# OF UNITS:
NET DENSITY:
MINIMUM LOT SIZE:
75' x 140'
DRIVEWAY GUEST SPACES:
22 SPACES
*ALL UNITS TO HAVE DRIVEWAYS THAT ACCOMMODATE 3 VEHICLES
ON STREET GUEST SPACES (TYP. 9' x 19'):
STREET A - 22 SPACES
STREET B - 12 SPACES
STREET C - 14 SPACES
STREET D - 11 SPACES
TOTAL GUEST SPACES:
81 SPACES (3.7 PER LOT)