Chandler GO Refunding Bonds-Series 2021-Preliminary Official Statement-draft

City of Chandler — Regular Meeting (2021-08-26)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 171548 characters
PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED NOVEMBER __, 2021 
 
NEW ISSUE – BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY 
RATINGS: 
Fitch: 
“___” 
 
Moody’s: “___” 
 
S&P:  
“___” 
 
See “RATINGS” herein 
 
In the opinion of Gust Rosenfeld P.L.C., Phoenix, Arizona, Bond Counsel, under existing laws, regulations, rulings and judicial decisions, interest 
income on the Bonds is exempt from Arizona Income Taxes. Interest income on the Bonds is subject to federal income taxes. See “TAX MATTERS” 
herein 
 
$48,610,000* 
CITY OF CHANDLER, ARIZONA 
GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS, 
TAXABLE SERIES 2021 
 
Dated:  Date of Initial Delivery 
Due:  July 1, as shown on the inside front cover page 
 
The City of Chandler, Arizona (the “City”) will issue its $48,610,000* aggregate principal amount of General Obligation Refunding Bonds, 
Taxable Series 2021 (the “Bonds”) for the purpose of (i) providing funds for the purpose of refunding and redeeming, in advance of their 
respective maturities, certain of the City’s Bonds Being Refunded (as defined herein) and (ii) paying the costs of issuance of the Bonds.  
 
The Bonds will be dated the date of initial delivery and will be issuable as fully registered securities without coupons and will be initially 
registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), New York, New York, which will act as 
securities depository for the Bonds.   Beneficial interests in the Bonds will be available to purchasers in amounts of $5,000 of principal due 
on specific maturity dates or integral multiples thereof.  Purchasers will not receive certificates representing their beneficial interests in the 
Bonds.  See APPENDIX E – “BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY SYSTEM.”  The principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds will be 
paid by U.S. Bank National Association to Cede & Co., as long as Cede & Co. is the registered owner of the Bonds.  Disbursement of such 
payments to the DTC participants is the responsibility of DTC, and disbursement of such payments to the purchasers of beneficial ownership 
interests in the Bonds is the responsibility of DTC participants and Indirect Participants (as defined herein), as more fully described herein.  
The City and DTC each reserve the right to discontinue the book-entry-only system at any time. 
 
See Maturity Schedule on Inside Front Cover Page 
 
The Bonds will mature on the dates and in the principal amounts set forth on the inside front cover page.  Interest on the Bonds will be 
payable semiannually on January 1 and July 1, commencing January 1, 2022*.  The Bonds will not be subject to redemption prior to their 
stated maturity dates. 
 
Principal of and interest on the Bonds will be payable from a continuing, direct, annual, ad valorem tax levied against all taxable property 
within the boundaries of the City without limit as to rate, but limited in amount to a total amount not greater than the aggregate amount of 
principal and interest which will become due on the Bonds Being Refunded from the date of issuance of the Bonds to the final maturity of 
the Bonds Being Refunded. The application of such taxes to the Bonds will be subject to the prior rights of the owners of the Bonds Being 
Refunded to payment from the same ad valorem taxes in the event the monies deposited in an irrevocable depository trust with U. S. Bank 
National Association for the Bonds Being Refunded are insufficient to pay the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds 
Being Refunded, as they become due.  See “SECURITY FOR AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT OF THE BONDS” and “PLAN OF 
REFUNDING” herein. 
 
The Bonds are offered when, as and if issued by the City and received by the underwriters identified below (the “Underwriters”), subject 
to the approving legal opinion of Gust Rosenfeld P.L.C., Phoenix, Arizona, Bond Counsel, as to validity and State of Arizona tax 
exemption.  Certain legal matters will be passed upon solely for the benefit of the Underwriter(s) by their counsel _____________, Phoenix, 
Arizona.  It is expected that the Bonds, in book-entry-only form, will be available for delivery through the facilities of DTC on or about 
November __, 2021*. 
 
This cover page contains certain information for quick reference only.  It is not a summary of this issue of which the Bonds are a part.  
Investors must read the entire Official Statement to obtain information essential to the making of an informed investment decision with 
respect to the Bonds. 
 
 
 
UNDERWRITER(S) TBD 
                                                                 
* Preliminary, subject to change.

$48,610,000* 
CITY OF CHANDLER, ARIZONA 
GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS, 
TAXABLE SERIES 2021 
 
 
MATURITY SCHEDULE* 
 
Maturity 
Date 
(July 1) 
Principal 
Amount 
 
 
Interest 
Rate 
Price or 
Yield 
CUSIP® No. 
158843(a) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2022 
 
$1,385,000 
 
% 
 
% 
 
 
2023 
 
875,000 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2024 
 
875,000 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2025 
 
875,000 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2026 
 
18,500,000 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2027 
 
200,000 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2028 
 
25,900,000 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
________________________________ 
 
(a) CUSIP® is a registered trademark of the American Bankers Association.  CUSIP Global Services (“CGS”) is managed on 
behalf of the American Bankers Association by S&P Global Market Intelligence.  Copyright© 2021 CGS.  All rights reserved. 
CUSIP® data herein is provided by CGS.  This data is not intended to create a database and does not serve in any way as a 
substitute for the CGS database. CUSIP® numbers are provided for convenience of reference only.  None of the City, Bond 
Counsel, the Underwriters, the Financial Advisor (each as defined herein) or their agents or counsel assume responsibility for 
the accuracy of such numbers. 
                                                                 
* Preliminary, subject to change.

i 
CITY OF CHANDLER, ARIZONA 
 
 
 
 
CITY COUNCIL 
 
Kevin Hartke, Mayor 
Mark Stewart, Vice Mayor 
Christine Ellis, Councilmember 
René Lopez, Councilmember 
OD Harris, Councilmember  
Matt Orlando, Councilmember  
Terry Roe, Councilmember 
 
 
 
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS 
 
Joshua Wright, City Manager 
Debra Stapleton, Assistant City Manager 
Dawn Lang, Management Services Director 
 Kelly Schwab, City Attorney/Risk Manager 
Dana DeLong, City Clerk 
 
 
 
BOND COUNSEL 
 
Gust Rosenfeld P.L.C. 
Phoenix, Arizona 
 
 
 
FINANCIAL ADVISOR 
 
Piper Sandler & Co.® 
Phoenix, Arizona 
 
 
 
 
BOND REGISTRAR AND PAYING AGENT/DEPOSITORY TRUSTEE 
 
U.S. Bank National Association 
Phoenix, Arizona

ii 
REGARDING THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT 
 
This Official Statement does not constitute an offering of any security other than the City of Chandler, Arizona (the “City”) 
General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Taxable Series 2021 (the “Bonds”), identified on the inside front cover page hereof.  
This Official Statement does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, and there shall be no sale of 
the Bonds by any person in any jurisdiction in which it is unlawful to make such offer, solicitation or sale.  No dealer, broker, 
salesperson or other person has been authorized by the City to give any information or to make any representations other 
than as contained in this Official Statement, and if given or made, such other information or representations must not be 
relied upon as having been authorized by any of the foregoing. 
 
The information set forth in this Official Statement has been provided by the City, Maricopa County, the State of Arizona 
Department of Revenue and other sources which are considered to be reliable and customarily relied upon in the preparation 
of similar official statements, but such information is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness and is not to be 
construed as the promise or guarantee of the City or Piper Sandler & Co. (the “Financial Advisor”) or 
____________________ (collectively, the “Underwriters”).  The presentation of information, including tables of receipts 
from taxes and other sources, is intended to show recent historical information and is not intended to indicate future or 
continuing trends in the financial position or other affairs of the City.  All estimates and assumptions contained herein have 
been based on the latest information available and are believed to be reliable, but no representations are made that such 
estimates and assumptions are correct, will be realized or will be repeated in the future.  The information and any expressions 
of opinion contained herein are subject to change without notice, and neither the delivery of this Official Statement nor any 
sale made hereunder shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of 
the City or any other parties or matters described herein since the date thereof. 
 
The sale and issuance of the Bonds will not be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Arizona Securities Act in reliance upon exemptions provided under such acts for 
the sale and issuance of securities such as the Bonds.  The Bonds will not be listed on any stock or other securities exchange.  
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any other federal, State or other government entity or agency will 
have passed upon the merits of the Bonds or the accuracy or adequacy of this Official Statement or approved the Bonds for 
sale. 
 
None of the City, the Underwriters, the Financial Advisor and Bond Counsel (as defined herein) are actuaries, nor have any 
of them performed any actuarial or other analysis of the City’s unfunded liabilities under the Arizona Public Safety 
Retirement System, the Arizona State Retirement System or the Elected Officials’ Retirement Plan. 
 
The Underwriters have provided the following sentence for inclusion into this Official Statement: The Underwriters have 
reviewed the information in this Official Statement in accordance with, and as part of, their responsibilities to investors 
under federal securities laws as applied to the facts and circumstances of this transaction, but the Underwriters do not 
guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information. 
 
In connection with this offering, the Underwriters may allow concessions or discounts from the initial public offering prices  
to dealers and others, and the Underwriters may over allot or engage in transactions intended to stabilize the prices of the 
Bonds at levels above those which might otherwise prevail in the open market in order to facilitate their distribution.  Such 
stabilization, if commenced, may be discontinued at any time. 
 
A wide variety of other information, including financial information, concerning the City is available from publications and 
websites of the City and others.  Any such information that is inconsistent with the information set forth in this Official 
Statement should be disregarded.  No such information is a part of, or incorporated into, this Official Statement, except as 
expressly noted herein. 
 
The information contained herein in APPENDIX E – “BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY SYSTEM” has been furnished by The 
Depository Trust Company and no representation has been made by the City, the Financial Advisor or any of their counsel 
or agents, as to the accuracy or completeness of such information. 
 
The City will covenant to provide continuing disclosure as described in this Official Statement under “CONTINUING 
SECONDARY MARKET DISCLOSURE” and in APPENDIX F – “FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE 
CERTIFICATE,” pursuant to Rule 15c2-12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

iii 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
 
 
 
Page 
 
INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT ...............................................................................................................................................1 
THE BONDS .....................................................................................................................................................................................1 
Authorization and Purpose – Bonds ..........................................................................................................................................1 
Authorized and Unissued Bonds ................................................................................................................................................2 
General Provisions........................................................................................................................................................................2 
Bond Registrar and Paying Agent..............................................................................................................................................2 
Redemption Provisions  ...............................................................................................................................................................2 
Registration, Transfer and Exchange ........................................................................................................................................2 
Mutilated, Lost or Destroyed Bonds..........................................................................................................................................3 
Registration and Transfer ............................................................................................................................................................3 
SECURITY FOR AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT OF THE BONDS ................................................................................3 
Security for the Bonds..................................................................................................................................................................3 
Defeasance .....................................................................................................................................................................................4 
COVID-19..........................................................................................................................................................................................4 
PLAN OF REFUNDING ................................................................................................................................................................5 
BONDS BEING REFUNDED .......................................................................................................................................................6 
VERIFICATION OF MATHEMATICAL COMPUTATIONS...............................................................................................6 
SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS ............................................................................................................................................7 
ESTIMATED DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS.................................................................................................................8 
TAX MATTERS...............................................................................................................................................................................9 
LITIGATION ..................................................................................................................................................................................11 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS......................................................................................................................................................11 
CONTINUING SECONDARY MARKET DISCLOSURE ...................................................................................................11 
RATINGS ........................................................................................................................................................................................12 
UNDERWRITING .........................................................................................................................................................................12 
POLITICAL DONATIONS..........................................................................................................................................................12 
CERTIFICATION CONCERNING OFFICIAL STATEMENT ...........................................................................................13 
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION................................................................................................................................................13 
CONCLUDING STATEMENT...................................................................................................................................................14 
 
 
APPENDIX A  - CITY OF CHANDLER, ARIZONA — GENERAL ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC 
INFORMATION 
APPENDIX B  - CITY OF CHANDLER, ARIZONA — FINANCIAL DATA 
APPENDIX C - FORM OF APPROVING LEGAL OPINION 
APPENDIX D - CITY OF CHANDLER, ARIZONA — AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE    
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2020 
APPENDIX E  - BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY SYSTEM 
APPENDIX F  - FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE

1 
OFFICIAL STATEMENT 
 
$48,610,000* 
CITY OF CHANDLER, ARIZONA 
GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS,  
TAXABLE SERIES 2021 
 
 
INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT 
 
The Official Statement, which includes the cover page, inside front cover page and the appendices hereto (the “Official 
Statement”), has been prepared in connection with the original sale and issuance by the City of Chandler, Arizona (the 
“City”) of its $48,610,000* aggregate principal amount of General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Taxable Series 2021 
(the “Bonds”). 
 
The Bonds will be issued in the form of fully registered bonds, registered in the name Cede & Co., as nominee of The 
Depository Trust Company, New York, New York (“DTC”).  DTC will act as the securities depository for the Bonds. 
 
All financial and other information presented in this Official Statement has been provided by the City from its records, 
except for information expressly attributed to other sources.  The presentation of information, including tables of 
receipts from revenues, taxes and other sources, is intended to show recent historic information and is not intended to 
indicate future or continuing trends in the financial position or other affairs of the City.  No representation is made 
that past experience, as is shown by that financial and other information, will necessarily continue or be repeated in 
the future. 
 
Concurrently with the issuance of the Bonds, the City expects to offer its $95,265,000* Excise Tax Revenue Refunding 
Obligations, Taxable Series 2021 (the “Series 2021 Excise Tax Refunding Obligations”), pursuant to a separate official 
statement. The Series 2021 Excise Tax Refunding Obligations will not be secured by, or payable from, ad valorem 
taxes. See “STATEMENTS OF BONDS OUTSTANDING Excise Tax Revenue Obligations Outstanding and to be 
Outstanding” in APPENDIX B – “CITY OF CHANDLER, ARIZONA – Financial Data.” In addition to the bonds, 
the City expects to offer its $33,375,000* General Obligation Bonds, Series 2021 (the “Series 2021 GO Bonds”), 
pursuant to a separate official statement.  
 
Reference to provisions of Arizona law, whether codified in the Arizona Revised Statutes (the “Arizona Revised 
Statutes” or “A.R.S.”), or uncodified, or of the Arizona constitution (the “Arizona Constitution”) or the Charter of the 
City (the “Charter”) are references to those current provisions.  Those provisions may be amended, repealed or 
supplemented. 
 
As used in this Official Statement “debt service” means principal and interest on the obligations referred to, “County” 
means Maricopa County, Arizona and “State” or “Arizona” means the State of Arizona.  Initial capitals denote terms 
defined herein. 
 
 
THE BONDS 
 
Authorization and Purpose – Bonds 
 
The Bonds will be issued pursuant to the Arizona Constitution and laws of the State, including particularly Title 35, 
Chapter 3, Article 4, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended (the “Refunding Act”), and under the provisions of 
Resolution No. _____ authorizing issuance of the Bonds adopted by the Mayor and City Council of the City on August 
26, 2021 (the “Refunding Bond Resolution”).   
 
The Bonds are being issued in order to provide funds (i) to refund in advance of maturity the Bonds Being Refunded  
(as defined herein) and (ii) to pay the costs of issuance of the Bonds.  See “PLAN OF REFUNDING” herein.  All 
references herein to the Refunding Bond Resolution are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of such 
                                                                 
* Preliminary, subject to change.

2 
document.  A copy of the Refunding Bond Resolution may be inspected at the Office of the Management Services 
Director, 175 South Arizona Avenue, Chandler, Arizona 85225. 
 
Authorized and Unissued Bonds 
 
The City expects to issue additional general obligation bonds in the future pursuant to existing and future voted bond 
authorizations.  Such bonds may be secured by, and payable from, the same levy of ad valorem taxes as the Bonds 
and all other outstanding general obligation bonds of the City.  Following the sale of the Bonds, the City will have 
$150,180,000 aggregate principal amount of general obligation bonds authorized but unissued, pursuant to voter 
approvals given at special bond elections held on May 16, 1989, May 18, 1993, May 20, 1997, May 18, 2004 and May 
15, 2007.   
 
On June 5, 2021, the City Council adopted a resolution authorizing an election to be held on November 2, 2021 seeking 
additional general obligation voter authorization of approximately $150,180,000 to fund multiple projects, including 
neighborhood parks and street improvements, improve public safety services and equipment as well as upgrade City 
facilities. 
 
General Provisions 
 
The Bonds will be dated as of the date of initial delivery.  The Bonds will mature on the dates and in the principal 
amounts set forth on the inside front cover page of this Official Statement.  Interest on the Bonds will be payable 
semiannually on January 1 and July 1 commencing January 1, 2022* (each, an “Interest Payment Date”) and thereafter 
until maturity or prior redemption.  See “THE BONDS – Redemption Provisions” herein. 
 
The Bonds are issuable only in fully registered form in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC (see APPENDIX 
E – “BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY SYSTEM”).  Beneficial ownership interests in the Bonds may be purchased in book-
entry-only form through DTC Participants (as defined in APPENDIX E hereto) only in amounts of $5,000 of principal 
due on specific maturity dates or integral multiples thereof.  So long as DTC, or its nominee, Cede & Co., is the 
registered owner of all of the Bonds, all payments on the Bonds will be made directly to DTC and all references herein 
to “Owners” or registered owners of the Bonds (other than under the heading “TAX MATTERS”) shall mean Cede & 
Co., and shall not mean the owners of beneficial interests in the Bonds.  When notices are given, such notices shall be 
sent by the City or the Bond Registrar and Paying Agent (as defined below) to DTC only.  
 
Bond Registrar and Paying Agent 
 
U.S. Bank National Association, will serve as the initial bond registrar and paying agent (the “Bond Registrar and 
Paying Agent”) for the Bonds.  The City may change the Bond Registrar and Paying Agent without notice or consent 
of the registered owners of the Bonds. 
 
Redemption Provisions* [To be discussed] 
 
The Bonds will not be subject to redemption prior to their stated maturity dates. 
 
Registration, Transfer and Exchange 
 
The City will cause the registration books showing the registered owners of the Bonds (the “Bond Register”) to be 
established and maintained at the designated corporate trust office of the Bond Registrar and Paying Agent for the 
registration and transfer of the Bonds, as provided for in the Bond Resolution. 
 
Except as otherwise provided in the Bond Resolution with respect to the Bonds registered in the name of Cede & 
Co., as nominee for DTC, or a successor securities depository, each Bond will be transferable only upon the Bond 
Register by the registered owner of the Bond in person or by an attorney duly authorized in writing, upon surrender 
of the Bond together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar and Paying Agent and 
duly executed by the registered owner or his duly authorized attorney.  For every exchange or transfer of Bonds, 
                                                                 
* Preliminary, subject to change.

3 
whether temporary or definitive, the City or the Bond Registrar and Paying Agent may make a charge sufficient to 
reimburse it for any tax, fee, governmental charge or cost incurred in connection with such exchange or transfer.  
 
Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond at the designated corporate trust office of the Bond Registrar and Paying 
Agent, duly endorsed by, or accompanied by a written instrument or instruments of transfer in form satisfactory to 
the Bond Registrar and Paying Agent and duly executed by the registered owner or his attorney-in-fact duly 
authorized in writing, the Bond Registrar and Paying Agent will authenticate, date and deliver in the name of the 
transferee or transferees, a new fully-registered Bond or Bonds of the same maturity date and a like aggregate 
principal amount in authorized denominations.  Any Bond or Bonds may be exchanged at the designated corporate 
trust office of the Bond Registrar and Paying Agent for a Bond or Bonds of the same maturity date and a like 
aggregate principal amount in authorized denominations. 
 
The Bond Registrar and Paying Agent will transfer any Bond during the period beginning at the close of business on 
each Record Date, to and including the day preceding the next Interest Payment Date, but the interest payment on 
such Interest Payment Date will be payable to and mailed to the registered owner of such Bond on the Record Date.   
 
The Bond Registrar and Paying Agent will not be required to transfer or exchange any Bond after notice of 
redemption with respect to a Bond has been mailed, nor during the period of fifteen (15) days next preceding the 
mailing of any notice of redemption with respect to any Bond. 
 
Mutilated, Lost or Destroyed Bonds 
 
If the book-entry-only system described above is discontinued, and any Bond becomes mutilated, destroyed or lost, 
the City will cause to be executed and delivered a new Bond, of like type, date, maturity and tenor in exchange and 
substitution for and upon the cancellation of such mutilated Bond, or in lieu of and in series substitution for such Bond 
destroyed or lost, upon the registered owner paying the reasonable expenses and charges of the City in connection 
therewith and, in the case of a Bond destroyed or lost, filing with the Bond Registrar and Payin g Agent by the 
registered owner evidence satisfactory to the Bond Registrar and Paying Agent that such Bond was destroyed or lost 
and furnishing the Bond Registrar and Paying Agent with a sufficient indemnity bond pursuant to A.R.S. Section 47-
8405. 
 
Registration and Transfer 
 
So long as the book-entry-only system is in effect, the Bonds will not be transferred.  If the book-entry-only system is 
discontinued, the Bonds will be transferred only upon the bond register maintained by the Bond Registrar and  Paying 
Agent and one or more new Bonds, registered in the name of the transferee, of the same principal amount, maturity 
and rate of interest as the surrendered Bonds will be authenticated, upon surrender to the Bond Registrar and Paying 
Agent of the Bond or Bonds to be transferred, together with an appropriate instrument of transfer executed by the 
transferor if the Bond Registrar and Paying Agent’s requirements for transfer are met.  The City has chosen the 15th 
day of the month preceding an Interest Payment Date.  The Bond Registrar and Paying Agent may, but will not be 
required to, transfer or exchange any Bonds during the period from the Record Date to and including the next 
respective Interest Payment Date.  The Bond Registrar and Paying Agent may, but will not be required to, transfer or 
exchange any Bonds which have been selected for redemption.  If the Bond Registrar and Paying Agent transfers or 
exchanges Bonds within the periods referred to above, the interest payment on such Bonds will be made payable to 
and mailed to the owners shown on the bond register maintained by the Bond Registrar and Paying Agent as of the 
close of business on the respective Record Date. 
 
If the book-entry-only system is discontinued, the transferor will be responsible for all transfer fees, taxes, and any 
other costs relating to the transfer of ownership of individual Bonds. 
 
 
SECURITY FOR AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT OF THE BONDS 
 
Security for the Bonds 
 
The Bonds will be payable as to both principal and interest from ad valorem taxes levied against all taxable property 
within the City without limit as to rate, but limited in amount to a total amount not greater than the aggregate amount

4 
of principal and interest which will become due on the Bonds Being Refunded from the date of issuance of the Bonds 
to the final maturity of the Bonds Being Refunded. The application of such taxes to the Bonds will be subject to the 
prior rights of the owners of the Bonds Being Refunded to payment from the same ad valorem taxes in the event the 
monies in the Depository Trust (as defined herein) are insufficient to pay the principal of, premium, if any, and interest 
on the Bonds Being Refunded, as they become due.  See “PLAN OF REFUNDING” and “VERIFICATION OF 
MATHEMATICAL COMPUTATIONS” herein. 
 
Following collection and deposit of monies into the debt service fund for payment of the Bonds, the City may invest 
such monies in investments comprised of, with certain restrictions: federally insured savings accounts or certificates 
of deposit from eligible depositories; collateralized repurchase agreements; obligations issued or guaranteed by the 
United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof; obligations of the State or any Arizona city (including the 
City), town or school district; bonds of any county, municipal or municipal utility improvement district payable from 
property assessments; the local government investment pool established by the State; commercial paper of prime 
quality that is rated “P1” by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or rated “A+” or better by S&P Global 
Ratings, a division of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services, LLC (“S&P”) or their successors (all commercial paper 
must be issued by corporations organized and doing business in the United States); and fixed income secu rities of 
corporations organized and doing business in the United States rated “A” or better by Moody’s and S&P. THE 
PROCEEDS OF THE BONDS ARE NOT PLEDGED TO, NOR DO THEY SECURE, PAYMENT OF THE 
BONDS. A record of property taxes levied and collected by the City for the current and most recent five fiscal years 
is set forth in the table “Real and Secured Property Taxes Levied and Collected”  in APPENDIX B – “City of Chandler, 
Arizona – Financial Data.” 
 
Defeasance 
 
Pursuant to the Refunding Bond Resolution, payment of all or any part of the Bonds may be provided for by the 
irrevocable deposit, in trust, of monies or obligations issued or guaranteed by the United States of American 
(“Defeasance Obligations”) or both, which, with the maturing principal of and interest on such Defeasance 
Obligations, if any, will be sufficient, as evidenced by a certificate or report of an accountant, to pay when due the 
principal or redemption price of and interest on such Bonds. Any Bonds so provided for will no longer be deemed 
outstanding under the Resolution or payable from ad valorem taxes on table property in the City and the owners of 
such Bonds shall thereafter be entitled to payment only from the monies and Defeasance Obligations deposited in 
trust. 
 
 
COVID-19 
 
The outbreak and spread of the novel strain of coronavirus, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (“COVID-19”), which has been 
designated a global pandemic by the World Health Organization, is negatively affecting local, state and global 
economies.  While economic activity is adversely impacted as governments, businesses and citizens react to, plan for, 
and try to prevent or slow further transmission of the virus, this adverse economic impact is somewhat mitigated by 
federal stimulus packages and state and local laws and programs to support business activity.  Financial markets, 
including the stock markets in the United States and globally, have seen significant volatility and declines attributed 
to COVID-19 concerns. On March 11, 2020, as part of the State’s response to address the outbreak, Arizona Governor, 
Doug Ducey (the “Governor”), declared a state of emergency.  On March 13, 2020, President Donald Trump declared 
a national emergency, freeing up funding for federal assistance to state and local governments.  An initial State of 
Arizona stay home Executive Order expired after six weeks on May 15, 2020.  The Governor has since issued several 
executive orders in response to then-current virus conditions.  These orders cover topics including physical distancing, 
virus testing and reporting, contact tracing, face coverings, closing and reopening of business operation, large 
gatherings, the start of the 2020/21 school year and vaccine distribution. 
 
On June 29, 2020, the Governor issued Executive Order 2020-43 (Slowing the Spread of COVID-19) originally 
pausing until July 27, 2020 the operations of bars, gyms, movie theatres, water parks, and tubing rentals (to be 
reviewed every two weeks); and delaying the start of in-person K-12 education until August 17, 2020.  After further 
increases in COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations in the State, the Governor announced and issued on July 9, 2020 
Executive Order 2020-47 (Limiting Indoor Dining), limiting indoor dining at restaurants to less than 50% 
occupancy.  The order pausing operations of the previously specified activities was extended on July 23, 2020.  On

5 
August 6, for schools, and on August 10, for paused businesses, the Arizona Department of Health Services released 
benchmarks for achieving phased, safe in-person reopenings.  The benchmarks, with minimal, moderate and 
substantial condition categories, address, by county for a two-week period, weekly average cases per 100,000 
population; diagnostic test percent positivity; and COVID-19-like-illness as a percent of hospital visits.  On March 5, 
2021, the Governor issued Executive Order 2021-05 allowing specific business occupancy percentage limitations to 
expire while leaving physical distancing and mask protocols in place. Additionally, Executive Order 2021-05 allows 
for Major League Sports to operate with approval of safety precautions and physical distancing. 
 
Most recently, on March 25, 2021, the Governor issued an order (“Executive Order 2021-06”) that rescinded all prior 
limits on organized public events and capacity and spacing requirements at restaurants.  Executive Order 2021-06 also 
prohibits counties, cities and towns from making or issuing any order, rule or regulation that conflicts with Executive 
Order 2021-06 or any other executive order relating to COVID-19, including any county, city or town mandate on the 
use of face coverings.  
 
Vaccine distribution is underway in the State.  Executive Order 2020-58 requires all insurers regulated by the State to 
waive all cost sharing requirements for consumers. 
 
The City has already received approximately $33,300,000 in various grants to support operations related to COVID-
19 and is actively looking for and will apply for additional grant awards as they may become available.  Additionally, 
the City has already received $29,983,456 through the State from the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security 
Act passed by the U.S. Congress and enacted into law in March 2020.  The funding was designed to cover public 
safety expenditures which freed up resources in the General Fund of the City.   
 
The fiscal year 2021-22 adopted budget used conservative revenue projections and expenditure levels that reflect the 
return to a more normal revenue year as the impacts of expected revenue decreases related to COVID-19 did not come 
to fruition in FY 2020-21.  It is possible that the full financial impact of COVID-19 on the City, its economy, and its 
financial position could change significantly as circumstances evolve.  The City will continue to monitor events as 
they occur, especially those that may have a significant impact on the City’s budget and finances and take appropriate 
action where necessary.   
 
 
PLAN OF REFUNDING 
 
The proceeds of the sale of the Bonds remaining after payment of certain costs of issuance will be placed in a special 
trust fund (the “Depository Trust”) with U.S. Bank National Association, as depository trustee (the “Depository 
Trustee”), pursuant to a depository trust agreement by and among the City, the Depository Trustee (the “Depository 
Trust Agreement”) and the bond registrar and paying agent for the Bonds Being Refunded, to be applied to the payment 
of the Bonds Being Refunded as identified below. Such funds will be used to acquire securities issued or guaranteed 
by the United States of America (the “Government Obligations”), the maturing principal of and interest income with 
respect to which are calculated to be sufficient, along with certain cash held pursuant to the Depository Trust 
Agreement or contributed by the City, to pay debt service on the Bonds Being Refunded until their prior redemption 
dates specified in the following table, and to redeem the Bonds Being Refunded on such prior redemption dates, 
without premium. 
See “BONDS 
BEING 
REFUNDED” 
and “VERIFICATION 
OF MATHEMATICAL 
COMPUTATIONS” herein.

6 
BONDS BEING REFUNDED* 
 
The following table sets forth the issue series, stated maturity dates, interest rates, principal amounts outstanding and 
to be refunded, redemption dates and CUSIP numbers certain of the City’s outstanding general obligation bonded 
indebtedness (the “Bonds Being Refunded”).  The Bonds Being Refunded will be redeemed at prices equal to the 
principal amounts thereof, plus interest accrued to their respective redemption dates, without premium. 
 
 
Issue  
Series 
Maturity 
Date 
(July 1) 
Interest 
Rate 
Principal 
Amount 
Outstanding 
Principal 
Amount 
Refunded 
Redemption 
Date 
Redemption 
Price 
CUSIP No. 
158843 (a) 
2014REF 
2026 
5.000% 
$17,620,000 
$17,620,000 
7/1/2024 
100% 
WQ1 
 
2028 
3.500 
25,700,000 
25,700,000 
7/1/2024 
100 
WW8 
$43,320,000 
$43,320,000 
 
To the extent the monies and Government Obligations held by the Depository Trustee in the Depository Trust are not 
sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds Being Refunded, the City will remain liable for payment 
of the Bonds Being Refunded.  The ad valorem tax to be levied for the payment of the Bonds will be unlimited as to 
rate, but limited in amount so that the total aggregate of taxes levied to pay principal of and interest on the Bonds in 
the aggregate will not exceed the total aggregate of principal of and interest due on the Bonds Being Refunded from 
the date of issuance of the Bonds to the final date of maturity of the Bonds Being Refunded.  The Refunding Act 
provides that the issuance of the Bonds will in no way infringe upon the rights of holders of the Bonds Being Refunded 
to rely upon a tax levy for the payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds Being Refunded if the monies and 
the Government Obligations held in the Trust prove insufficient.  The Refunding Act further provides that owners of 
the Bonds must rely upon the sufficiency of such monies and the Government Obligations held in the Trust for the 
payment of the Bonds Being Refunded.  See “SECURITY FOR AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT OF THE BONDS.” 
 
VERIFICATION OF MATHEMATICAL COMPUTATIONS  
 
Public Finance Partners LLC (the “Verification Agent”), will deliver to the City, on or before the issue date of the 
Bonds, its verification report indicating, among other things, that it has verified the mathematical accuracy of the 
sufficiency of the anticipated receipts from the Government Obligations, together with the initial cash deposit, to pay, 
when due, the principal of, interest and applicable premiums, if any, on the Bonds Being Refunded.  The verification 
performed by the Verification Agent will be solely based upon data, information and documents provided to the 
Verification Agent by the City and its representatives. The Verification Agent has restricted its procedures to verifying 
the computations provided by the City and its representatives and has assumed the accuracy of the data, information 
and documents used in the computations. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank.] 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                 
* Preliminary, subject to change

7 
SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS 
 
 
Sources of Funds 
 
 
 
Principal Amount 
 
$48,610,000.00* 
[Net] Original Issue Premium (a) 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Sources 
 
 
 
 
 
Uses of Funds 
 
 
 
Deposit to Depository Trust 
 
    $ 
Costs of Issuance (b) 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Uses 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(a) [Net] Original Issue Premium is the original issue premium on the Bonds less the original issue discount on the 
Bonds. 
(b) Includes fees of Bond Counsel, Bond Registrar and Paying Agent, Official Statement preparation, Depository 
Trustee, Financial Advisor, rating agencies and other costs related to the issuance and delivery of the Bonds. 
 
 
 
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank.] 
 
                                                                 
* Preliminary, subject to change.

8 
ESTIMATED DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS* (a) 
 
The following schedule sets forth (i) the annual debt service requirements of the outstanding general obligation bonds of the City, (ii) less the Bonds Being 
Refunded, (iii) plus the estimated debt service requirements of the Bonds, (iv) the estimated debt service requirements of the Series 2021 GO Bonds and, (v) the 
estimated combined total annual general obligation bond debt service requirements of the City after issuance of the Bonds.* 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(a) Prepared by the Financial Advisor to the City.  Columns may not add up due to rounding. 
 
(b) Interest is estimated. The first interest payment on the Bonds will be due January 1, 2022*.  Thereafter, interest payments will be made semiannually on 
January 1 and July 1 until the final maturity of the Bonds. 
 
 
 
                                                                 
* Preliminary, subject to change. 
Fiscal
Outstanding
 Less:
Estimated
Year
General Obligation
Less:
Plus:
Plus: 
Water & Wastewater
Net General Obligation
Ended
Bonded Debt
The Bonds Being Refunded*
The Bonds*
Series 2021 GO Bonds*
Revenue Supported 
Bonded Debt Service
June 30
Debt Service
Principal
Interest (b)
Principal
Interest (b)
Principal
Interest
GO Debt Service *(1)
To Be Outstanding*
2022
39,651,235
$           
1,780,500
$          
1,385,000
$          
478,864
$          
12,670,000
$        
778,750
            
12,591,560
$                    
40,591,789
$                         
2023
39,167,835
             
1,780,500
            
875,000
               
734,344
            
13,725,000
          
828,200
            
12,110,560
                      
41,439,319
                           
2024
38,371,335
             
1,780,500
            
875,000
               
729,146
            
3,750,000
            
279,200
            
11,552,810
                      
30,671,371
                           
2025
35,896,085
             
1,780,500
            
875,000
               
720,326
            
1,300,000
            
129,200
            
10,894,060
                      
26,246,051
                           
2026
35,310,435
             
17,620,000
$        
1,780,500
            
18,500,000
          
555,262
            
650,000
               
77,200
              
11,011,410
                      
24,680,987
                           
2027
33,048,635
             
899,500
               
200,000
               
356,102
            
645,000
               
51,200
              
9,468,760
                        
23,932,677
                           
2028
33,148,685
             
25,700,000
          
899,500
               
25,900,000
          
353,970
            
635,000
               
25,400
              
11,422,260
                      
22,041,295
                           
2029
6,664,235
               
-
                                      
6,664,235
                             
2030
6,588,610
               
-
                                      
6,588,610
                             
2031
6,531,560
               
-
                                      
6,531,560
                             
2032
6,470,185
               
-
                                      
6,470,185
                             
2033
2,199,125
               
-
                                      
2,199,125
                             
2034
2,203,000
               
-
                                      
2,203,000
                             
2035
2,178,125
               
-
                                      
2,178,125
                             
287,429,085
$         
43,320,000
$        
10,701,500
$        
48,610,000
$        
3,928,013
$       
33,375,000
$        
2,169,150
$       
79,051,420
$                    
242,438,328
$                       
(1) [Pre refunding debt service, will be updated prior to posting the POS.]

9 
TAX MATTERS 
 
In the opinion of Bond Counsel, interest income on the Bonds is exempt from Arizona income taxes. Additionally, in 
the opinion of Bond Counsel, interest income on the Bonds is subject to federal taxes. Bond Counsel expresses no 
opinion as to any other tax consequences regarding the Bonds. INTEREST ON THE BONDS IS NOT EXCLUDED 
FROM GROSS INCOME FOR FEDERAL INCOME TAX PURPOSES. THE LEGAL DEFEASANCE OF THE 
BONDS MAY RESULT IN A DEEMED SALE OR EXCHANGE OF THE BONDS UNDER CERTAIN 
CIRCUMSTANCES, AND OWNERS OF THE BONDS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS AS 
TO THE FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL, AND FOREIGN TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR ACQUISITION, 
OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF BONDS. 
 
The following discussion is generally limited to “U.S. owners,” meaning Beneficial Owners of Bonds that for United 
States federal income tax purposes are individual citizens or residents of the United States, corporations or other 
entities taxable as corporations created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any state thereof 
(including the District of Columbia), and certain estates or trusts with specific connections to the United States. 
Partnerships holding the Bonds, and partners in such partnerships, should consult their own tax advisors regarding the 
tax consequences of an investment in the Bonds (including their status as U.S. owners). 
 
Original Issue Discount 
 
The initial public offering price of the Bonds maturing July 1, 20__ through and including July 1, 20__ (collectively, 
the “Discount Bonds”), are less than the respective amounts payable at maturity. As a result, the Discount Bonds will 
be considered to be issued with original issue discount. The difference between the initial public offering price 
(assuming it is the first price at which a substantial amount of that maturity of Discount Bonds was sold (the “OID 
Issue Price”)) of the Discount Bonds, and the amount payable at maturity of the Discount Bonds will be treated as 
“original issue discount.” With respect to a Beneficial Owner who purchases a Discount Bonds in the initial public 
offering at the OID Issue Price and who holds the Discount Bonds to maturity, the full amount of original issue 
discount will constitute interest income which is includible in the gross income of the Beneficial Owner of the 
Discount Bonds for federal income tax purposes, but not for Arizona income tax purposes, and that Beneficial Owner 
will not, under present federal income tax law and present Arizona income tax law, realize a taxable capital gain upon 
payment of the Discount Bonds at maturity. 
 
The original issue discount on each of the Discount Bonds is treated for federal income tax purposes and Arizona 
income tax purposes as accreting daily over the term of such Discount Bonds on the basis of a constant interest rate 
compounded at the end of each six-month period (or shorter period from the date of original issue) ending on January 
1 and July 1 (with straight-line interpolation between compounding dates). 
 
The amount of original issue discount accreting each period will be added to the Beneficial Owner’s tax basis for the 
Discount Bonds. The adjusted tax basis will be used to determine taxable gain or loss upon disposition of the Discount 
Bonds. An initial Beneficial Owner of a Discount Bonds who disposes of the Discount Bonds prior to maturity should 
consult his or her tax advisor as to the amount of the original issue discount accrued over the period held and the 
amount of taxable gain or loss upon the sale or disposition of the Discount Bonds prior to maturity. 
 
The Code contains certain provisions relating to the accretion of original issue discount in the case of subsequent 
Beneficial Owners of the Discount Bonds. Beneficial Owners who do not purchase the Discount Bonds in the initial 
offering at the OID Issue Price should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the tax consequences of the 
ownership of Discount Bonds. 
 
A portion of the original issue discount that accretes in each year to a Beneficial Owner of a Discount Bonds may 
result in certain collateral federal income tax consequences. 
 
Beneficial Owners of Discount Bonds in states other than Arizona should consult their own tax advisors with respect 
to the state and local tax consequences of owning Discount Bonds.

10 
Bonds Purchased at a Premium 
 
The initial public offering price of the Bonds maturing on July 1, 20__ through and including July  1, 20__ 
(collectively, the “Premium Bonds”) are greater than the amount payable on such Premium Bonds at maturity. An 
amount equal to the difference between the initial public offering price of a Premium Bond (assuming that a substantial 
amount of the Premium Bonds of that maturity are sold to the public at such price) and the amount payable at maturity 
constitutes premium to the initial Beneficial Owner of such Premium Bonds. The basis for federal income tax purposes 
of a Premium Bond in the hands of such initial Beneficial Owner may be reduced each year by the amortizable 
obligation premium, if elected by such Beneficial Owner. If elected, the amount of amortizable obligation premium 
also will be treated as a federal income tax deduction. Such reduction in basis will increase the amount of any gain (or 
decrease the amount of any loss) to be recognized for federal income tax purposes upon a sale or other taxable 
disposition of a Premium Bond. The amount of premium which is amortizable each year by an initial Beneficial Owner 
is determined by using such Beneficial Owner’s yield to maturity. Beneficial Owners of the Premium Bonds should 
consult with their own tax advisors with respect to the determination of amortizable obligation premium with respect 
to the Premium Bonds for federal income tax purposes and with respect to the state and local tax consequences of 
owning Premium Bonds. 
 
Disposition of Bonds 
 
A Beneficial Owner of Bonds will generally recognize gain or loss on the redemption, sale or exchange of a Bond 
equal to the difference between the redemption or sales price (exclusive of the amount paid for accrued interest) and 
the Beneficial Owner’s adjusted tax basis in the Bonds. Generally, the Beneficial Owner’s adjusted tax basis in the 
Bonds will be the Beneficial Owner’s initial cost, increased by the original issue discount previously included in the 
Beneficial Owner’s income to the date of disposition and decreased by any amortized bond premium. Any gain or loss 
generally will be capital gain or loss and will be long-term or short-term, depending on the Beneficial Owner’s holding 
period for the Bonds. 
 
Defeasance 
 
Persons considering the purchase of a Bond should be aware that a defeasance of a Bond by the District could result 
in the realization of gain or loss by the Beneficial Owner of the Bond for federal income tax purposes, without any 
corresponding receipts of monies by the Beneficial Owner. Such gain or loss generally would be subject to recognition 
for the tax year in which such realization occurs, as in the case of a sale or exchange. 
 
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding 
 
General information reporting requirements will apply to payments of principal and interest made on a Bond and the 
proceeds of the sale of a Bond to non-corporate holders of the Bonds, and “backup withholding” at a rate of twenty-
four percent (24%) will apply to such payments if the owner fails to provide an accurate taxpayer identification number 
in the manner required or fails to report all interest required to be shown on its federal income tax returns. A Beneficial 
Owner of a Bond that is a U.S. owner generally can obtain complete exemption from backup withholding by providing 
a properly completed IRS Form W-9 (Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification). 
 
Non-U.S. Owners 
 
Holders who are not United States persons as defined for federal tax purposes may be subject to special rules and 
should consult their tax advisors. 
 
Circular 230 
 
THE FOREGOING DISCUSSION IN “TAX MATTERS” WAS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN BY BOND 
COUNSEL TO BE USED, AND IT CANNOT BE USED, FOR THE PURPOSE OF AVOIDING PENALTIES 
THAT MAY BE IMPOSED ON AN OWNER OF A BOND. EACH PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER OF THE 
BONDS SHOULD 
SEEK 
ADVICE 
BASED ON THE PROSPECTIVE 
PURCHASER’S 
PARTICULAR 
CIRCUMSTANCES

11 
LEGAL MATTERS 
 
 
LITIGATION 
 
To the knowledge of the appropriate representatives of the City, no litigation or administrative action or proceeding 
is pending or threatened restraining or enjoining, or seeking to restrain or enjoin, the execution or delivery of the 
Bonds or contesting or questioning the proceedings and authority under which the Bonds have been authorized and 
are to be executed, sold or delivered, or the validity of the sale of the Bonds. 
 
There are several claims and/or lawsuits pending against the City of Chandler.  The City retains responsibility for 
payment of the first one million seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($1,750,000.00) of each loss, and has excess 
insurance coverage for the next thirty million ($30,000,000.00) dollars.  The City is adequately funded for its retention.  
The largest lawsuit currently filed against the City alleges that a police officer participating in a regional task force 
contributed to the death of an unarmed passenger when he participated in a vehicle containment maneuver that 
allegedly led to the death of the suspect and passenger.  The City received a notice of claim in the amount of five 
million dollars ($5,000,000). The City is a Co-defendant in the case and has filed a motion for summary judgement 
for the dismissal of the case.  Oral argument will be held on the motion for summary judgement in October, 2021. 
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
The audited financial statements of the City as of June 30, 2020, and for its fiscal year then ended, which are included 
as APPENDIX D – “CITY OF CHANDLER, ARIZONA – AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE 
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2020” of this Official Statement, have been audited by Heinfeld, Meech & Co., P.C.  These 
are the most recent audited financial statements available to the City.  These audited financial statements may not 
represent the current financial conditions of the City.  The City did not request the consent of Heinfeld, Meech & Co., 
P.C. to include its report and Heinfeld, Meech & Co., P.C. has performed no procedures subsequent to rendering its 
opinion on the financial statements.  
 
 
CONTINUING SECONDARY MARKET DISCLOSURE 
 
The City has agreed for the benefit of the beneficial owners of the Bonds, in accordance with Rule 15c2-12 of the 
Commission (the “Rule”) to provide certain financial information and operating data relating to the City by not later 
than February 1 in each year commencing February 1, 2022 (the “Annual Reports”), and to provide notices of the 
occurrence of certain enumerated events (the “Notices”) as set forth in APPENDIX F – “FORM OF CONTINUING 
DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE”.  The Annual Reports and the Notices and any other documentation or information 
required to be filed by such covenants will be filed by the City with the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (the 
“MSRB”) in a format prescribed by the MSRB.  Currently, the MSRB requires filing through their Electronic 
Municipal Market Access system (“EMMA”), each as described in APPENDIX F – “FORM OF CONTINUING 
DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE.”  The specific nature of the information to be contained in the Annual Report and 
the Notices and the method of their dissemination is set forth in APPENDIX F.  These covenants will be made in order 
to assist the original purchaser in complying with the Rule.  A failure by the City to comply with these covenants must 
be reported in accordance with the Rule and must be considered by any broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer 
before recommending the purchase or sale of Bonds in the secondary market. Pursuant to Arizona Law, the ability of 
the City to comply with such covenants is subject to annual appropriation of funds sufficient to provide for the costs 
of compliance with such covenants.  Should the City not comply with such covenants due to a failure to appropriate 
for such purpose, the City has covenanted to provide notice of such failure. Absence of continuing disclosure, due to 
non-appropriation or otherwise, may adversely affect the transferability and marketability of the Bonds.   
 
Continuing disclosure undertakings previously entered into by the City (the "Prior Undertakings") called for the City 
to file Annual Reports with EMMA for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, by February 1 of the following year.  The 
City timely filed Annual Reports for all of its bonds and obligations except for its Improvement District No. 89 
Improvement Bonds, which Annual Report was not related to the CUSIP number for the above-referenced bonds and 
was therefore inadvertently omitted from the general continuing disclosure filings of the City.

12 
The City’s Management Services Department has instituted written procedures to facilitate compliance with existing 
continuing disclosure undertakings, the continuing disclosure undertaking related to the Bonds, and future 
undertakings in all material respects. The City believes it is currently in material compliance with all of its continuing 
disclosure requirements. 
 
 
RATINGS 
 
Fitch Ratings, Inc. (“Fitch”), Moody’s and S&P, have assigned the ratings of “___”, “___” and “___,” respectively, 
on the Bonds.  Such ratings reflect only the views of Fitch, Moody’s and S&P.  An explanation of the significance of 
the Fitch rating may be obtained at One State Street Plaza, New York, New York 10040.  An explanation of the 
significance of a rating assigned by Moody’s may be obtained at 7 World Trade Center, 250 Greenwich Street, New 
York, New York 10007.  An explanation of the significance of a rating assigned by S&P may be obtained at 55 Water 
Street, New York, New York 10041.  Such ratings may be revised downward or withdrawn entirely by Fitch, Moody’s, 
or S&P, if, in their respective judgment, circumstances so warrant.  Any downward revision or withdrawal of such 
ratings may have an adverse effect on the market price of the Bonds.  The City has covenanted in its continuing 
disclosure certificate (see “CONTINUING SECONDARY MARKET DISCLOSURE” herein) that it will file notice 
of any formal change in any such rating relating to the Bonds. 
 
 
UNDERWRITING 
 
The Bonds will be purchased by ___________________ (collectively, the “Underwriters”), at an aggregate purchase 
price of _____________, pursuant to a bond purchase contract (the “Purchase Agreement”) entered into by and 
between the City and the Underwriters.  If the Bonds are sold to produce the prices or yields shown on the inside front 
cover page hereof, the Underwriters’ compensation will be _______________.  The Purchase Agreement provides 
that the Underwriters will purchase all of the Bonds so offered if any are purchased.  The Underwriters may offer and 
sell the Bonds to certain dealers (including dealers depositing the Bonds into unit investment trusts) and others at 
prices higher or yields lower than the public offering prices or yields stated on the inside front cover page hereof.  The 
initial offering prices or yields set forth on the inside front cover page may be changed, from time to time, by the 
Underwriters without amendment of this Official Statement. 
 
The Underwriters and their affiliates are full service financial institutions engaged in various activities, which may 
include securities trading, commercial and investment banking, financial advisory, investment management, principal 
investment, hedging, financing and brokerage services. The Underwriters and their affiliates have, from time to time, 
performed, and may in the future perform, various financial advisory and investment banking services for the City for 
which they received or will receive customary fees and expenses. In the ordinary course of their various business 
activities, the Underwriters and their affiliates may make or hold a broad array of investments and actively trade debt 
and equity securities (or related derivative securities, which may include credit default swaps) and financial 
instruments (including bank loans) for their own account and for the accounts of their customers and may at any time 
hold long and short positions in such securities and instruments. Such investment and securities activities may involve 
securities and instruments of the City. The Underwriters and their affiliates may also communicate independent 
investment recommendations, market color or trading ideas and/or publish or express independent research views in 
respect of such assets, securities or instruments and may at any time hold, or recommend. 
 
 
POLITICAL DONATIONS 
 
To the best of their knowledge, none of the City, the Bond Registrar and Paying Agent, the Financial Advisor or their 
counsel or agents are known to have made political contributions other than those, if any, permitted under applicable 
securities regulations to any person who sought a seat on the City Council at its last election or any election prior to 
the last election.

13 
CERTIFICATION CONCERNING OFFICIAL STATEMENT 
 
Documents delivered with respect to the Bonds will include a certificate to the effect that to the knowledge of the 
Management Services Director of the City after appropriate review, this Official Statement is true, correct and 
complete in all material respects and does not include any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any 
material fact necessary to make such statements and information herein, in light of the circumstances under which 
they were made, not misleading and that no event has occurred since date of this Official Statement that should be 
disclosed herein in order to make the statements and information herein not misleading in any material respect.  
 
 
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 
 
Legal matters relating to the validity of the Bonds under Arizona law, and with regard to the tax-exempt status of the 
interest thereon (see “TAX MATTERS”) will be prepared by Gust Rosenfeld P.L.C., Phoenix, Arizona, Bond Counsel. 
The signed legal opinion of Bond Counsel dated and premised on the law in effect only as of the date of original 
delivery of the Bonds, will be delivered to the City at the time of original issuance.   
 
The form of this legal opinion is set forth as APPENDIX C – “FORM OF APPROVING LEGAL OPINION”. The 
legal opinion to be delivered may vary from the text of APPENDIX C if necessary to reflect the facts and law on the 
date of delivery. The opinion will speak only as of its date, and subsequent distribution, by recirculation of this Official 
Statement or otherwise, should not be construed as a representation that Bond Counsel has reviewed or expressed any 
opinion concerning any matters relating to the Bonds subsequent to the original delivery of the Bonds. 
 
Such legal opinion expresses the professional judgment of Bond Counsel as to the legal issues explicitly addressed 
therein. By rendering a legal opinion, the opinion giver does not become an insurer or guarantor of that expression of 
professional judgment, of the transaction opined upon, or of the performance of parties to the transaction. The 
rendering of an opinion also does not guarantee the outcome of any legal dispute that may arise out of the transaction. 
 
The Financial Advisor has been engaged by the City for the purpose of advis ing the City as to certain debt service 
structuring matters specific to the Bonds, and on certain matters relative to the overall debt financing program of the 
City.  The Financial Advisor has assisted in the assemblage and preparation of this Official Statement at the direction 
and on behalf of the City.  No person is entitled to rely on the Financial Advisor’s participation as an assumption of 
responsibility for, or an expression of opinion of any kind with regard to, the accuracy or completeness of the 
information contained herein. 
 
The information in this Official Statement has been provided by the City, the Maricopa County, Arizona, Assessor’s, 
Treasurer’s and Finance offices, the Arizona Department of Revenue and other sources which are considered to b e 
reliable and are customarily relied upon in the preparation of similar official statements, but such information is not 
guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness.  All estimates and assumptions contained herein are believed to be reliable, 
but no representations are made that such estimates and assumptions are correct or will be realized.  Any information 
or expressions of opinion herein are subject to change without notice and neither the delivery of this Official Statement 
nor any sale hereunder shall under any circumstances create an implication that there has been no change as to the 
affairs of the City.  This Official Statement may be supplemented from time to time by the provision of supplemental 
or additional documents.  
 
From time to time, there are legislative proposals (and interpretations of such proposals by courts of law and other 
entities and individuals) which, if enacted, could alter or amend the property tax system of the State and numerous 
matters, both financial and nonfinancial, impacting the operations of municipalities which could have a material 
impact on the City and could adversely affect the secondary market value of the Bonds.  It cannot be predicted whether 
or in what form any such proposal might be enacted or whether, if enacted, it would apply to obligations (such as the 
Bonds) issued prior to enactment.

14 
CONCLUDING STATEMENT 
 
The summaries or descriptions of documents contained herein and all references to other materials not purporting to 
be quoted in full are only brief outlines of certain provisions thereof and do not constitute complete statements of such 
provisions and do not summarize all the pertinent provisions of such documents.  For further information, reference 
should be made to the complete documents, copies of which are available for inspection from the Financial Advisor. 
 
To extent that any statements made in this Official Statement involve matters of opinion or estimates, whether or not 
expressly stated to be such, they are made as such and not as representations of fact or certainty and no representation 
is made that any of these opinions or estimates have been or will be realized.  Information in this Official Statement 
has been derived by the City from official records and other sources and is believed to be reliable. Information other 
than that obtained from the official records of the City has not been independently confirmed or verified by the City 
and its accuracy is not guaranteed.  The presentation of information, including tables of receipts from taxes and other 
sources, is intended to show recent historic information and is not intended to indicate future or continuing trends in 
the financial position or other affairs of the City.  No representation is made that past experience, as is shown by that 
financial or other information, will necessarily continue or be repeated in the future. 
 
Neither this Official Statement nor any statement that may have been or that may be made orally or in writing is to be 
construed as part of a contract or agreement between the City and the purchasers or holders of any Bonds. 
 
The attached Appendices A through F are integral parts of this Official Statement and must be read together with all 
of the foregoing statements. 
 
This Official Statement has been prepared on direction of the City and has been approved by and executed for and on 
behalf of the City by its authorized representative indicated below. 
 
 
 
CITY OF CHANDLER, ARIZONA 
 
 
 
 
By:  
 
 
 
 
 Kevin Hartke, Mayor

A-1 
APPENDIX A 
 
CITY OF CHANDLER, ARIZONA 
 
GENERAL ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 
 
General 
 
The City is located in the southeastern portion of the County.  The City encompasses approximately 65 square miles 
and is one of several major cities comprising the greater Phoenix, Arizona metropolitan area, which is Arizona’s 
economic, political and population center. 
 
The City was founded in 1912 and incorporated in 1920.  The following table sets forth a record of the population 
statistics of the City since 1980, along with the population statistics for the County and the State. 
 
 
POPULATION STATISTICS 
 
 
 
City of 
 
Maricopa 
 
State of 
Year 
 
Chandler 
 
County 
 
Arizona 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2020 Estimate (a) 
 
272,011 
 
4,439,220 
 
7,294,587 
2010 Census (Revised) 
 
236,326 
 
3,817,117 
 
6,392,017 
2005 Special Census 
 
233,681 
 
3,700,516 
 
6,044,985 
2000 Census 
 
176,581 
 
3,072,149 
 
5,130,632 
1990 Census 
 
90,533 
 
2,122,101 
 
3,665,305 
1980 Census 
 
29,673 
 
1,509,175 
 
2,716,546 
 
 
 
(a)   
Provisional estimate as of July 1, 2020. (Published December, 2020). 
 
Source: 
U.S. Census Bureau and the Office of Employment & Population Statistics, Arizona Department of 
Administration. 
 
The following table contains historic information in regard to the geographic incorporated size of the City as set forth 
in square miles. 
 
LAND AREA 
City of Chandler, Arizona  
 
 
 
Square 
Year 
 
Miles 
2020 
 
65.53 
2019 
 
65.33 
2018 
 
65.19 
2017 
 
65.07 
2016 
 
65.05 
 
 
 
Source: 
The City Management Services Department and City Planning Division.

A-2 
Municipal Government and Organization 
 
The City adopted the City Charter in 1965 which provides for a Council-Manager form of government.  The seven-
member City Council is elected at-large on a staggered basis and consists of the Mayor and six councilmembers.  The 
current Mayor and councilmembers serve four-year terms.   
 
The City Council appoints the City Manager who has full responsibility for carrying out City Council policies and 
administering City operations.  The City Manager is responsible for appointment of department heads.  The City 
employees are hired under procedures as specified in the City Charter.  The government and operations of the City 
are provided by a staff of 1,702 full-time employees. 
 
Economy 
 
The major industry clusters contributing to the economic base of the City include government, manufacturing, 
financial services, commercial activities (including construction and commerce), high technology and healthcare.  The 
City is home to a wide variety of technology industries, with a heavy concentration in the semiconductor cluster.  The 
continued economic development of the City is driven by the educational attainment of Chandler residents.  
Approximately 76% of adult residents have attended some college and 45% possess a bachelor’s or advanced degree.  
This educational attainment level attracts employers in “knowledge based” industries, adding to the concentration of 
high-wage jobs. 
 
The following table sets forth unemployment rate averages for the City, the County, the State and the United States. 
 
UNEMPLOYMENT RATE AVERAGES 
 
Calendar 
 
City of 
 
Maricopa 
 
State of 
 
United 
Year 
 
Chandler 
 
County 
 
Arizona 
 
States 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2021 (a) 
 
5.5% 
 
6.3% 
 
6.7% 
 
6.2% 
2020  
 
6.6 
 
7.3 
 
7.8 
 
8.1 
2019  
 
3.5 
 
4.0 
 
4.7 
 
3.7 
2018  
 
3.6 
 
4.1 
 
4.7 
 
3.9 
2017  
 
3.7 
 
4.2 
 
4.9 
 
4.4 
2016  
 
4.0 
 
4.6 
 
5.4 
 
4.9 
 
 
 
 
(a)  Data through May 31, 2021 and is not seasonally adjusted. 
 
Source: 
The City Management Services Department and City Planning Division, Arizona Office of Economic 
Opportunity, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

A-3 
Below is the list of the industrial and business parks operating within the City. 
 
INDUSTRIAL AND BUSINESS PARKS 
City of Chandler, Arizona 
 
 
 
 
 
Source: 
The City’s Economic Development Division. 
 
 
 
 
 
10 Chandler
Chandler Hamilton Plaza
Park Place
Advanced Medical Plaza
Chandler Office Center
Parkside Professional Plaza
Airpark South Professional Village
Chandler Office Park
Presidio
Aquila Ocotillo
Chandler Technology Center
Price Road Industrial Park
Arizona Corporate Park North
Chandler Viridian
Price Warner Medical Office
Arizona Corporate Park South
Continuum Business Park
Promenade Commons
Ascend at Chandler Airport Center
Dobson Business Park
Regency Office Park
AZ202
Dobson Professional Plaza
San Tan Corporate Center I & II
Bogle Business Park
Eastpoint Business Plaza
San Tan Crossing Professional Plaza
Carmel Professional Plaza
Fairview Corporate Park
San Tan Technology Center
Chandler Airpark 
First Chandler Business Park
Southgate Park 
Chandler Airport Business Center
Focus Corporate Plaza
Southpark Business Center
Chandler Airport Commerce Center
Fountains at Ocotillo
Stellar Industrial Airpark
Chandler Center
Frye Road Industrial Park
The Park at Santan
Chandler Corporate Centers
Gila Springs Industrial Park
Tiburon
Chandler Crossroads
Kyrene 202 Business Park
Warner Commerce Park
Chandler Distribution Center 
Lotus Project
Watermark
Chandler Echelon
Mach One
Westech Corporate Center
Chandler Freeway Business Park
Mammoth Professional Building
Williams Field Road Business Park
Chandler Freeway Crossings
McClintock Professional Plaza
Willis/AZ Ave Corporate
Chandler Gateway Medical Plaza
Paloma Kyrene Business Park
Chandler Gateway Office Park
Park Germann

A-4 
Employment and Employers 
 
Electronics plants located in the City include: Microchip Technologies, producer of electronic circuitry; Rogers 
Corporation, manufacturer of materials for printed circuit boards and power electronic devices; Intel Corporation, 
manufacturer of microcomputer components; and NXP, manufacturer of semiconductor and satellite systems.  
 
A partial list of major manufacturing employers located within the City is set forth in the following table. 
 
MAJOR MANUFACTURING EMPLOYERS (a) 
City of Chandler, Arizona 
 
 
 ____________________  
 
(a) Some of the major manufacturing employers are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and in accordance therewith file reports, proxy 
statements and other information (collectively, the “Filings”) with the Commission.  Such Filings may be 
inspected and copies are available at the public reference facilities maintained by the Commission at 100 F Street, 
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.  In addition, the Filings may also be inspected at the offices of the New York 
Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) at 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.  The Filings may also be obtained 
through the internet on the Commission’s EDGAR database at http://www.sec.gov.  Neither the City, nor the 
Financial Advisor or their respective agents or consultants have examined the information set forth in the Filings 
for accuracy or completeness, nor do they assume responsibility for the same. 
 
Source:  The City's Economic Development Division. 
 
Employer
Description
Employees
Intel Corporation
Microprocessors
12,000
NXP
Semiconductors/Satellite Systems
1,700
Northrop Grumman
Aerospace Launch Systems
2,150
Microchip Technology
Microprocessors
1,500
Arizona Nutritional Supplements 
Vitamin Manufacturing and R&D
700
Rogers Corp. (including Headquarters)
Microwave Substrates
460
Ultra Clean Technology
Frame and Sheet Metal Fabrication
320
TEL - Tokyo Electron
Semiconductors
250
Smurfit Kappa
Paper Based Packaging 
220
Comfort Systems USA
HVAC and Building Systems
265
Garmin
Navagation Systems
165
Advanced Circuits
PCB Manufacturer 
150
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
Industrial Gas Manufacturing
150
Z Modular
Modular Construction Systems
150
Infineon Technologies Americas Corp
Semiconductors 
140
Marvell Technologies 
Semiconductors 
135
CoValence Laboratories 
Contract Manufacturer 
130
Armorworks
Defense and Security Manufacturer 
125
South Bay Circuits
Circuit Boards
125
Isola
Circuit Board Materials
115

A-5 
The City also serves as the location of a significant number of non-manufacturing employers.  The following is a 
partial list of major non-manufacturing employers in the City. 
 
 
MAJOR NON-MANUFACTURING EMPLOYERS (a)  
City of Chandler, Arizona  
 
 
 ____________________  
 
(a) Some of the major non-manufacturing employers are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange 
Act, and in accordance therewith file the Filings with the Commission.  The Filings may be inspected and copies 
are available at the public reference facilities maintained by the Commission.  In addition, the Filings may also 
be inspected at the offices of the NYSE or on the Commission’s EDGAR database. None of the City, the Financial 
Advisor or their respective agents or consultants have examined the information set forth in the Filings for 
accuracy or completeness, nor do they assume responsibility for the same. 
 
Source:  The City's Economic Development Division. 
 
Agriculture 
 
Agricultural production still is a contributor to the diversified economic base of the City.  Principal products include 
livestock, alfalfa, small grains, citrus and vegetables.  As the residential, commercial and industrial development of 
the City has occurred, the contribution of agricultural production to the economy of the City has decreased. 
 
Commerce 
 
A 1.3 million square foot super-regional shopping mall known as Chandler Fashion Center opened for business in 
2001.  This mall is home to four anchor department stores, including Dillard’s, Macy’s, a 20-screen Harkins theater 
complex and outdoor urban village and more than 180 specialty retail shops.  Additionally, the Downtown Chandler 
entertainment and business district serves as a hub for commercial activities due to numerous retail, restaurant and 
entertainment venues.  Several community shopping centers serve residents of the City and surrounding areas, 
including Chandler Pavilions, Casa Paloma, Chandler Festival, Chandler Gateway, Paseo Del Oro Shopping Center, 
Approximate
Number of Full
Employer
Description
Time Employees
Wells Fargo Ocotillo Corporate Campus
Regional Corporate Headquarters
5,500
Chandler Unified School District
Public Education
4,900
Bank of America
Mortgage Processing Center
3,600
Chandler Regional Medical Center
Hospital
2,500
PayPal
E-Commerce Business
1,700
City of Chandler
Government
1,586
Verizon
Wireless Customer Support
1,400
Avnet
Computer Products Distribution
1,100
Basha's
Corporate HQ/Food Distribution
1,100
Liberty Mutual Insurance
Financial Services Center
1,000
GM IT Innovation Center
Software Development
890
GM Financial Services
Auto Financial Services
820
CVS Health
Retail Pharmaceutical Healthcare Products
700
Toyota Financial Services
Financial Services Center
700
Safelite Auto Glass
Auto Glass Repair and Replacement
700
Mr. Cooper
Mortgage Processing Center
600
Pearson Educational Institution
Educational Services
500
Allstate Insurance Co.
Financial Services Center
500

A-6 
North Park Plaza Shopping Center, Fulton Ranch Towne Center and Crossroads Towne Center.  A number of 
neighborhood shopping centers are also dispersed throughout the City.   
 
The following table sets forth a record of the excise tax collections of the City for the most recent four fiscal years and 
the excise taxes expected for the current fiscal year, pursuant to the City’s 2020-21 and 2021-22 adopted budget.  
 
City of Chandler 
Excise Tax Collections 
FY 2016-17 to FY 2021-22  
 
2016-17 (a) 
2017-18 (a) 
2018-19 (a) 
2019-20 (b) 
Estimated 
2020-21 
Adopted 
2021-22 
City Transaction Privilege 
(Sales) and Use Tax (c) 
$120,189,651 
$127,584,410 
$138,888,825 
$140,798,389  
$145,018,200 
$148,278,200 
State-Shared Sales Tax 
23,768,564 
23,821,248 
25,525,595 
26,597,361  
27,600,000 
28,790,000 
State-Shared Income Tax  
31,910,426 
30,652,381 
30,693,731 
33,255,159  
37,000,000 
33,500,000 
Franchise Fees  
3,272,104 
3,560,770 
3,556,211 
3,432,995  
3,342,100 
2,980,000 
Licenses and Permits 
7,209,693 
6,512,930 
7,398,669 
7,908,291  
7,295,600 
7,461,000 
Fines and Forfeitures 
2,560,255 
3,368,445 
3,196,843 
2,714,065  
 2,643,200 
3,745,500 
Totals 
$188,910,693 
$195,500,184 
$209,259,874 
$214,706,260 
$222,899,100 
$224,754,700 
 ____________________  
 
(a) Amounts are actual collections provided by the City’s Budget Division (cash basis). 
 
(b) Unaudited FY 2020-21 Revenues.  
 
(c) Includes City Transaction Privilege Sales Tax, Privilege Audit Assessments, Privilege License Fees and Privilege 
Tax Interest.  Excludes Excise Tax Refunds from GPLET program. 
 
Source: City of Chandler Management Services Department. 
 
Tourism 
 
The direct, indirect and induced benefits derived from the activities surrounding tourism contribute greatly to the 
economic health of the community.  With 33 hotels representing more than 4,000 available rooms and three hotels 
under construction which will provide an additional 510 rooms, the City’s tourism market continues to receive 
significant private sector investment in new properties and the repositioning of older properties to meet the needs of 
leisure and business travelers.  
 
Leisure travel to the City is driven by proximity to various shopping, dining, recreational, sporting and scenic 
attractions located within a short drive.  However, business travel comprises most of the City’s visitors due to the high 
density of employment.  As the City is home to a number of Fortune 500 companies with global, regional and local 
headquarters spanning several industry clusters (autonomous vehicle, high-tech manufacturing, semiconductor 
manufacturing, aerospace, aviation, healthcare and bioscience, advanced business and financial business services, 
etc.), business travelers drive the City’s lodging market. 
 
Transportation 
 
Industry, business and residents benefit from the transportation network available in and near the City.  Rail, bus, 
highway and air facilities are developed throughout the area. 
 
The City is served by the Union Pacific Railroad for long distance freight rail service and the Valley Metro Transit 
System for local public transportation.

A-7 
The City is served by a network of streets and highways.  The Superstition Freeway (“U.S. Highway 60”) parallels 
the northern border of the City.  U.S. Highway 60 connects to cities in northern and eastern Arizona.  The Superstition 
Freeway also connects to Interstate Highway 10 which connects the cities of Tucson and Phoenix.  State Highway 87 
and Arizona Loop 202 bisect the City.  The Price Freeway (a north-south portion of Loop 101) and the San Tan 
Freeway (an east-west portion of Loop 202) facilitate traffic flow to the City by connecting together the 101, 202 and 
I-10 freeways. 
 
Residents of the area have ready access to Chandler Municipal Airport, Stellar Airpark, Phoenix-Mesa Gateway 
Airport and Sky Harbor International Airport.  The Chandler Municipal Airport, owned and operated by the City, is 
located approximately three miles southeast of the central business district of the City and is designed to relieve private 
aircraft activity at Sky Harbor International Airport.  The Chandler Municipal Airport has approximately 430 based 
aircraft and two parallel runways, 4,870 feet and 4,401 feet, respectively.  Chandler Municipal Airport offers various 
services including full service maintenance facilities, flight schools, and aircraft hangars.  The Stellar Airpark is a 
private airport that is open to public use and is located west of the central business district of the City.  The Stellar 
Airpark has a 4,000 foot runway and provides various services. The Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport is owned and 
operated by the Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Authority that includes the City of Mesa, City of Phoenix, Town of 
Gilbert, Town of Queen Creek, the Gila River Indian Community and the City of Apache Junction.  The Phoenix-
Mesa Gateway Airport has three expansive runways (10,401 feet; 10,201 feet; and 9,300 feet), a passenger terminal, 
and convenient parking. Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport is positioned to be a dynamic reliever airport to Phoenix’s 
Sky Harbor International Airport.  Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport is located 15 miles to the northwest of 
the City. 
 
Education 
 
Arizona State University (“ASU”) is the largest public university in the Southwest by enrollment.  ASU spans five 
campuses in the metro Phoenix area and has an enrollment of approximately 119,951 students including ASU online 
programs. ASU’s main campus remains in the bordering City of Tempe, Arizona and is home to the Ira A. Fulton 
Schools of Engineering, a nationally recognized research and innovation institution designed to meet the growing 
needs of the engineering and technology industries.  Adjacent to Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport, the Polytechnic 
Campus serves approximately 5,243 students.  Chandler is home to the ASU Chandler Innovation Center where ASU 
provides technology-based education and operates a community makerspace.  The University of Arizona’s Chandler 
campus is housed in the City’s community center, where it offers a number of tech-focused undergraduate and 
graduate level degrees, a professional MBA, and graduate programs in education, school psychology, and legal 
studies.  Located in the City is the Chandler-Gilbert Community College, which offers a complete educational program 
and serves nearly 20,000 students.  The Chandler Unified School District provides primary and secondary education 
to residents in the City area through 31 elementary schools, 10 middle school programs, 6 high schools and 3 
alternative schools.  A number of private and charter schools are also located in the City.

B-1 
APPENDIX B 
 
CITY OF CHANDLER, ARIZONA - FINANCIAL DATA 
 
 
2021/22 Fiscal Year –Estimated Net Full Cash and Assessed Values  
 
Estimated Net Full Cash Value (a)(b) 
$40,751,143,934 
Net Assessed Limited Property Value (b) 
3,463,794,661 
Net Assessed Full Cash Value (b) 
4,682,558,944 
 
 
 
(a) Estimated Net Full Cash Value is the total market value of the property, less unsecured personal property and less 
estimated exempt property within the City, as projected by the Arizona Department of Revenue, Division of 
Property and Special Taxes. 
 
(b) See “PROPERTY TAXES” herein for an explanation of these values. 
 
 
Source: 
State and County Abstract of the Assessment Roll, Arizona Department of Revenue and Property Tax Rates 
and Assessed Values, Arizona Tax Research Association and the City. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]

B-2 
STATEMENTS OF BONDS OUTSTANDING 
 
General Obligation Bonds Outstanding and to be Outstanding  
 
Issue 
Series 
 
Original 
Amount 
 
Maturity 
Dates 
Outstanding 
Balance 
Outstanding 
2014REF 
 
$214,540,000  
 
7-1-22/26,28 
$ 135,690,000  
2016REF 
 
39,050,000  
 
7-1-25/27 
39,050,000  
2017 
 
58,740,000  
 
7-1-22/32 
39,040,000  
2019 
 
30,400,000  
 
7-1-22/35 
29,400,000  
Total General Obligation Bonds Outstanding 
 $ 243,180,000  
Less: The Bonds Being Refunded 
(43,320,000)* 
Plus:  The Bonds 
48,610,000 *  
Plus:  The Series 2021 GO Bonds 
33,375,000 * 
Less: Water and Wastewater Funds Supported General Obligation Bonds (a) 
(67,855,000)* 
Net General Obligation Bonds Outstanding and to be Outstanding 
 $ 213,990,000* 
 ___________________________ 
 
(a) The City intends to pay the debt service requirements of the following general obligation bonds with funds 
provided by the water and wastewater funds of the City: $53,861,000 aggregate principal amount of the City’s 
General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014 and $13,550,000 aggregate principal amount of the City’s 
General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2016 and $18,730,000* aggregate principal amount of the City’s 
General Obligation Refunding Bond, Taxable Series 2021.  In the event that revenues available for payment of 
such annual debt service requirements from the respective enterprise funds proves to be insufficient, or the City 
elects not to pay debt service requirements on such general obligation bonds from the water and wastewater funds, 
the debt service requirements of such bonds will become payable from the annual levy of an ad valorem tax upon 
all of the taxable property located within the City. 
 
 
 
 
 
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank] 
 
 
                                                                 
* Preliminary, subject to change.

B-3 
Water and Wastewater Revenue Bonds Outstanding (a) 
 
 
Balance 
Outstanding 
Total Water and Wastewater Revenue Bonds Outstanding   
 $                   - 
Plus: Water and Wastewater Funds Supported General Obligation Bonds (b) 
49,125,000 
Plus: Water and Wastewater Funds Supported Excise Revenue Tax Obligations (c) 
122,095,000 
Plus: The Bonds 
18,730,000* 
Plus: The Series 2021 Excise Tax Refunding Obligations  
95,265,000* 
Total Water and Wastewater Supported Bonds Outstanding  
 $ 285,215,000* 
 
 
 
 
(a) Excludes the debt service requirements for the City’s refunded and defeased bonds currently outstanding which 
are secured by obligations issued by the United States Government being held in their respective irrevocable trust 
accounts.   
 
(b) The City intends to pay the debt service requirements of the Water and Wastewater Funds Suppo rted General 
Obligation Bonds with funds provided by the Water and Wastewater Funds of the City.  In the event that revenues 
available for payment of such annual debt service requirements from the respective enterprise funds proves to be 
insufficient, or the City elects not to pay debt service requirements on such general obligation bonds from the 
Water and Wastewater Funds, the debt service requirements of such bonds will become payable from the annual 
levy of an ad valorem tax upon all of the taxable property located within the City. 
 
(c) The City intends to pay the debt service requirements of the following obligations with funds provided by the 
Water and Wastewater Funds of the City:  $2,610,000 aggregate principal amount of the City’s Excise Tax 
Revenue Obligations, Series 2011, $97,400,000 aggregate principal amount of the City’s Excise Tax Revenue 
Obligations, Series 2013, $61,245,000 aggregate principal amount of the City’s Excise Tax Revenue Obligations, 
Series 2015, $19,510,000 aggregate principal amount of the City’s Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2016 , the 
$35,220,000 aggregate principal amount of the City’s Excise Tax Revenue Obligations, Series 2017 and the 
$12,320,000 aggregate principal amount of the City’s Excise Tax Revenue Obligations, Series 2019 (together, 
the “Water and Wastewater Funds Supported Excise Tax Revenue Obligations”). 
 
 
 
 
 
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]

B-4 
Excise Tax Revenue Obligations Outstanding and to be Outstanding (a) 
 
Issue 
Series 
Purpose 
Original 
Principal 
Amount 
Original  
Principal  
Maturity  
Dates 
Principal 
Balance 
Outstanding 
  
  
  
  
  
2011 
Various Projects 
 $15,000,000  
07-01-12/22 
$     905,000  
2013 
Various Projects 
104,500,000  
07-01-15/33 
90,800,000  
2015 
Various Projects 
66,660,000  
07-01-17/35 
55,835,000  
2016 
Refunding 
19,510,000  
07-01-20/28 
17,140,000  
2017 
Various Projects 
36,220,000  
07-01-18/37 
33,420,000  
2019 
Various Projects 
13,000,000  
07-01-20/28 
11,050,000  
Total Excise Tax Revenue Obligations Outstanding  
$209,150,000  
Less: Obligations Being Refunded  
 (87,055,000)* 
Plus:  The Series 2021 Refunding Obligations  
95,265,000 * 
Less: Water and Wastewater Funds Supported Excise Tax Revenue Obligations (b)  
(217,360,000)* 
Net Excise Tax Revenue Obligations Outstanding and to be Outstanding 
$                   - 
 
 
 
(a) The City intends to issue $95,265,000* of Series 2021 Excise Tax Refunding Obligations concurrently with the 
issuance of the Bonds under a separate official statement. 
(b) The City intends to pay the debt service requirements of the Water and Wastewater Funds Supported Excise Tax 
Revenue Obligations with funds provided by the Water and Wastewater Funds of the City. 
 
 
Improvement District Bonds Outstanding 
 
Issue 
Series 
Purpose 
Original 
Principal 
Amount 
Original  
Principal  
Maturity  
Dates 
Principal 
Balance 
Outstanding 
  
  
  
  
  
2011A 
Spectrum Improvement District 
$7,370,000 
07-01-09/23 
$     1,245,000  
 
 
Total Improvement District Bonds Outstanding 
$     1,245,000 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                 
* Preliminary, subject to change.

B-5 
Direct General Obligation Bonded Debt, Legal Limitation  
and Available General Obligation Bonding Capacity 
 
By statute, the Arizona Constitutional limit for general obligation bonded indebtedness of a city for general municipal 
purposes may not exceed six percent (6%) of Net Full Cash Assessed Value in that city.  In addition to the six percent 
(6%) limitation for general purpose bonds, cities may issue general obligation bonds up to an additional twenty percent 
(20%) of the Net Full Cash Assessed Value for such city for water, artificial light or sewers, for the acquisition and 
development of land for open space preserves, parks, playgrounds and recreational facilities, for the acquisition and 
development of public safety, law enforcement, fire and emergency facilities and streets and transportation facilities. 
 
 
 
 
 
(a) Includes the Bonds. 
 
(b) This amount reduces the City’s borrowing capacity pursuant to State statutes and the Arizona Constitution , and 
the principal amount of bonds authorized at the elections.  Such capacity (but not authorization) will be recaptured 
as premium is amortized. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 __________________________  
 
* Preliminary, subject to change. 
 
 
General Municipal Purpose Bonds
Park, Street, and Transportation Bonds
Total 6% General Obligation
 $     280,953,537 
Total 20% General Obligation
 $           936,511,789 
Bonding Capacity
Bonding Capacity
Less:  6% General Obligation
Less:  20% General Obligation
Bonds Outstanding
          (5,851,900) *(a)
Bonds Outstanding
            (237,328,100) *(a)
Less: Original Issue Premium
*(b)
Less: Original Issue Premium
*(b)
Less: Unamortized Original Issue Premium
             (239,656)   (b)
Less: Unamortized Original Issue Premium
              (11,493,592)   (b)
Net 6% General Obligation
Net 20% General Obligation
Bonding Capacity
 $     274,861,981 
Bonding Capacity
 $           687,690,097 
Water, Light, Sewer, Open Space, Public Safety,
Law Enforcement, Fire and Emergency Services,

B-6 
Direct and Overlapping General Obligation Bonded Debt Outstanding  
 
 
__________________________ 
* 
(a) 
Proportion applicable to the City is computed on the ratio of 2020-21 net assessed limited property value for the 
overlapping jurisdiction within the City to the total net limited assessed property valuation of the overlapping 
jurisdiction. 
 
Does not include the obligation of the Central Arizona Water Conservation District (“CAWCD”) to the United 
States of America, Department of the Interior, for repayment of certain capital costs for construction of the 
Central Arizona Project (“CAP”), a major reclamation project that has been substantially completed by the 
Department of the Interior. The obligation is evidenced by a master contract between CAWCD and the 
Department of the Interior. In April 2003, the United States and CAWCD agreed to settle litigation over the 
amount of the construction cost repayment obligation, the amount of the respective obligations for payment of 
the operation, maintenance and replacement costs and the application of certain revenues and credits against 
such obligations and costs. Under the agreement, CAWCD’s obligation for substantially all of the CAP features 
that have been constructed so far will be set at $1.646 billion, which amount assumes (but does not mandate) 
that the United States will acquire a total of 667,724 acre feet of CAP water for federal purposes. The United 
States will complete unfinished CAP construction work related to the water supply system and regulatory storage 
stages of CAP at no additional cost to CAWCD. Of the $1.646 billion repayment obligation, 73% will be interest 
bearing and the remaining 27% will be non-interest bearing. These percentages have been fixed for the entire 
50-year repayment period, which commenced October l, 1993.  CAWCD is a multi-county water conservation 
district having boundaries coterminous with the exterior boundaries of Maricopa, Pima and Pinal Counties. It 
was formed for the express purpose of paying administrative costs and expenses of the CAP and to assist in the 
repayment to the United States of the CAP capital costs. Repayment will be made from a combination of power 
revenues, subcontract revenues (i.e., agreements with municipal, industrial and agricultural water users for 
delivery of CAP water) and a tax levy against all taxable property within CAWCD’s boundaries. At the date of 
this Official Statement, the tax levy is limited to fourteen cents per $100 of Net Assessed Limited Property 
Value, of which fourteen cents is being currently levied. (See Arizona Revised Statutes, Sections 48-3715 and 
48-3715.02.) There can be no assurance that such levy limit will not be increased or removed at any time during 
the life of the contract. 
 
(b) Includes total general obligation bonds outstanding.  Does not include authorized but unissued general obligation 
bonds of the City or such other jurisdictions as follows or which may be authorized in the future:  
 
                                                                 
*Preliminary, subject to change. 
Overlapping
Proportion Applicable to
General
City of Chandler (a)
Obligation
Approximate
Net Debt
Overlapping Jurisdiction
Bonded Debt (b)
Percent
Amount
State of Arizona
None
4.668%
None
Maricopa County (c) 
None
7.109%
None
Maricopa County Community College District (d)
250,065,000
$        
7.109%
17,777,103
$           
Maricopa County Special Health Care District
429,125,000
          
7.109%
30,506,465
             
Kyrene Elementary School District No. 28 
182,955,000
          
28.962%
52,987,566
             
Mesa Unified School District No. 4
275,525,000
          
4.458%
12,283,607
             
Gilbert Unified School District No. 41 
112,360,000
          
2.736%
3,074,527
               
Chandler Unified School District No. 80
385,946,000
          
75.352%
290,816,740
           
Tempe Union High School District No. 213
76,755,000
            
16.630%
12,764,727
             
East Valley Institute of Technology District No. 401
None
14.434%
None
City of Chandler (e) 
344,725,000
          
100.000%
344,725,000
           
Total Direct and Overlapping General Obligation Bonded Debt to be Outstanding
764,935,736
$         
*
*
*

B-7 
 
 
General Obligation Bonds 
Overlapping Jurisdiction 
 
Authorized but Unissued 
 
 
 
State of Arizona 
 
None 
Maricopa County 
 
None 
Maricopa County Community College District 
 
$           3,000 
Maricopa County Special Health Care District 
 
None 
Chandler Unified School District No. 80 
 
95,250,000 
Tempe Union High School District No. 213 
 
None 
Kyrene Elementary School District No. 28 
 
52,450,000 
Mesa Unified School District No. 4 
 
95,000,000 
Gilbert Unified School District No. 41 
 
108,000,000 
East Valley Institute of Technology District No. 401 
 
None 
City of Chandler (e) 
 
150,180,000 
_________________ 
* 
(c) This total does not include the City’s revenue bonds and excise tax revenue obligations currently outstanding as 
follows: 
 
 
Excise Tax Revenue Obligations 
$ 209,150,000* 
 
 
 
Includes Water and Wastewater Funds Supported General Obligation Bonds.  In the event that the net revenues 
would prove to be insufficient or the City elects not to pay debt service requirements on the Water and Wastewater 
Funds Supported General Obligation Bonds from revenues from these enterprises, this debt would become 
payable from ad valorem taxes. 
 
(d) Does not include $1,245,000 City improvement district bonds outstanding. 
 
(e) On May 27,2021 the City Council adopted a resolution calling for a special bond election requesting voter 
consideration of $272,685,000 in general obligation bonds. 
                                                                 
*Preliminary, subject to change.

B-8 
Direct and Overlapping General Obligation Bonded Debt Ratios 
 
Per Capita 
Bonded Debt 
Population 
Estimated @  
272,011 
As % of  
City’s Total 
2020/21  
Net Full  
Cash Value 
As % of  
City’s  
2020/21 
Estimated Net 
Full Cash Value 
Net Direct General Obligation Bonded Debt 
Outstanding and  to be Outstanding* (a) 
$1,267.32 
7.36% 
0.85% 
Net Direct and Overlapping General Obligation Bonded 
Debt Outstanding and to be Outstanding (a) 
 
$2,812.15 
 
16.34% 
 
1.88% 
 
 
 
(a) Includes the Bonds. 
 
Source: The Arizona Department of Economic Security, Research Administration Population and Statistical Unit and 
U.S. Census Bureau, Arizona Department of Administration. 
 
Direct and Overlapping Tax Rates per $100 Assessed Value 
 
Inside the City, East Valley Institute of Technology and: 
 
Tax 
Rate 
  
  
  
Gilbert Unified School District No. 41 
  
$11.2481 
 
 
 
Mesa Unified School District No. 4 
  
$12.3597 
 
 
 
Tempe Union High School District No. 213 and Kyrene Elementary School District No. 28 
  
$11.2712 
 
 
 
Chandler Unified School District No. 28 
  
$11.4012 
 
 
 
Source: 
Property Tax Rates and Assessed Values, Arizona Tax Research Association. 
 
 
                                                                 
* Preliminary, subject to change.

B-9 
Expenditure Limitation; One-Year and Multi-Year Overrides 
 
Since fiscal year 1982-83, all cities in Arizona have been subject to an annual expenditure limitation imposed by the 
Arizona Constitution. This limitation is based upon the City’s actual 1979-80 expenditures adjusted annually for 
subsequent growth in population and inflation. The Constitution exempts certain expenditures from the limitation. 
The principal exemptions for the City are payments for debt service on bonds and other long-term obligations, as well 
as expenditures of federal funds and certain state-shared revenues.  
 
The Constitution provides four processes, all requiring voter approval, for cities to modify the expenditure limitation: 
 
1. A four-year home rule option. 
2. A permanent adjustment to the 1979-80 base. 
3. A one-time override for the following fiscal year. 
4. An accumulation for pay-as-you-go capital expenditures. 
 
City voters have approved four-year home rule options on a regular basis since the implementation of the expenditure 
limitation. To the extent that the home rule option is not approved by the voters, the City would be subject to the 
expenditure limitations prescribed by the Constitution.  On August 28, 2018, the City’s voters approved a four-year 
home rule option to exceed the expenditure limitation by the City beginning in Fiscal Year 2019-20.  This four-year 
home rule option will be in effect through fiscal year 2022-23. 
 
 
City Retirement Systems Update 
 
All full-time employees of the City, the Mayor and City Council participate in one of the three pension plans 
administered by the State described below.  See Note 10 in APPENDIX D for further discussion of the retirement 
plans of the City. 
 
The Government Accounting Standards Board adopted GASB Statement Number 68, Accounting and Financial 
Reporting for Pensions (“GASB 68”), which, beginning with fiscal years starting after June 15, 2014, requires cost-
sharing employers to report their “proportionate share” of the plan’s net pension liability in their government-wide 
financial statements.  GASB 68 will also require that the cost-sharing employer’s pension expense component include 
its proportionate share of the plan’s pension expense, the net effect of annual changes in the employer’s proportionate 
share and the annual differences between the employer’s actual contributions and its proportionate share. 
 
Arizona State Retirement System  
 
All full-time City employees (except public safety personnel and elected officials) participate in the Arizona State 
Retirement System (the “System”), a multiple-employer cost-sharing defined benefit pension plan.  The System was 
established in 1953 and became effective in 1971.  The System provides for retirement, disability, health insurance 
premium benefits, and death and survivor benefits.  The System is administered in accordance with A.R.S. Title 38, 
Chapter 5.   
 
The actuarially determined contribution rates for the fiscal year 2020/21 were 12.22% (12.04% retirement and 0.18% 
long-term disability) for both employees and employers.  The City’s contribution to the System for the fiscal year 
2020/21 was $9,762,864 equal to the required contributions, not including alternate contributions.   
 
Effective July 1, 2021, the City’s annual contribution rates are 12.41% (12.22% retirement and 0.19% long-term 
disability) for fiscal year 2021/22 for both employees and employers.   
 
The System has reported increases in its unfunded liabilities as compared to both the smoothed value of plan assets 
and the market value of plan assets.  The most recent annual reports for the System may be accessed at:  
https://www.azasrs.gov.  The effect of the increase in the System’s unfunded liabilities on the City, or on the City’s 
and its employees’ future annual contributions to the System, cannot be determined at this time.

B-10 
Arizona Public Safety Personnel Retirement System (Full-Time Police and Firefighter Employees) 
 
All full-time sworn police officers and firefighters are eligible to participate in the Public Safety Personnel Retirement 
System (the “PSPRS”) in separate agent multiple-employer defined benefit retirement plans.  The PSPRS is jointly 
administered by the fund manager (a five-member board appointed by the Governor and the State Legislature) and 
257 local boards.  The PSPRS provides for retirement, health insurance premium benefits, and death and survivor 
benefits.  The PSPRS is administered in accordance with A.R.S. Title 38, Chapter 5, Article 4. 
 
The actuarially determined contribution rates for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 were 49.12% of annual covered 
payroll for police tiers 1 and 2, 44.22% for tier 3 defined benefit (DB) and 44.51% for tier 3 defined contribution 
(DC). For firefighters the contribution rate was and 43.84% for tiers 1 and 2, 41.25% for tier 3 DB and 37.90 for tier 
3 DC.  The City’s employer contribution to the PSPRS for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 was $13,017,877 for 
police and $7,993,728 for firefighters, equal to the required contributions, not including alternate contributions. 
 
Effective July 1, 2021, the City’s annual contribution rates are 7.65% for both groups of employees in tier 1, 11.65% 
for both groups in tier 2, 10.12% for Police tier 3 DB, 9.88% for Police DC, 13.76% for Fire DB and 10.41% for Fire 
DC. The rate are as follows for employers: 
 
Tier 1 Contribution Rate  
Hired into a PSPRS position before January 1, 2012: 
Police: 49.12% 
Fire: 41.67% 
Tier 2 Contribution Rate  
Hired into a PSPRS position on/after January 1, 2012 and before July 1, 2017: 
Police: 49.12% 
Fire: 41.67% 
Tier 3 Contribution Rate  
Hired into a PSPRS position on/after July 1, 2017: 
Defined Benefit:  
Police: 45.46% 
Fire: 39.78% 
Defined Contribution: 
 
Police: 45.22% 
Fire: 35.90% 
 
 
 
The PSPRS has reported overall increases in its unfunded liabilities as compared to both the smoothed value of plan 
assets and the market value of plan assets.  The City of Chandlers portions increased only slightly for Fire but 
decreased for Police due to the increased overpayments which have been made.  The most recent annual reports for 
the PSPRS may be accessed at: http://www.psprs.com/investments--financials/annual-reports.  The effect of the 
increase in the PSPRS’s unfunded liabilities on the City, or on the City’s and its employees’ future annual contributions 
to the PSPRS, is $56,672,244 for fire and $114,467,812 for police as of the June 30, 2020. Actuarial Reports prepared 
by Foster & Foster, Actuaries and Consultants.  City Council has approved a compressed pay down plan in order to 
pay off the unfunded liability. 
 
Elected Officials’ Retirement Plan (Mayor and City Council) 
 
The Mayor and Council of the City participate in two different plans:  The Elected Officials’ Retirement Plan (EORP) 
for councilmembers elected prior to 2014 and the Elected Officials’ Defined Contribution Retirement System 
(EODCRS) for Council members elected effective January 1, 2014, both multiple-employer cost-sharing defined 
benefit plans.  The administrator for the EORP and the EODCRS is also the fund manager of the PSPRS.  The EORP 
and EODCRS provides for retirement, health insurance premium benefits, and death and survivor benefits.   
 
The actuarially determined contribution rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020 was 61.43%.  The City’s 
contribution to the EORP and EODCRS for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 was $154,160, equal to the required 
contributions, not including alternate contributions.

B-11 
Effective July 1, 2021, the City’s annual contribution rate for EORP is 61.43% for employer and either 7% or 13% 
for employees (depending on their membership date), and the City’s annual contribution rate for EODCRS is 61.555% 
for employer and 8.125% for employees. 
The EORP has reported increases in its unfunded liabilities as compared to both the smoothed value of plan assets and 
the market value of plan assets.  The most recent annual reports for the EORP may be accessed at:  
http://www.psprs.com/investments--financials/annual-reports The estimated effect of the increase in the EORP’s 
unfunded liabilities on the City, or on the City’s and its employees’ future annual contributions to  the EORP, is 
$2,047,312 as of the June 30, 2020 EORP schedule of pension amounts by employer. 
 
Healthcare Benefits for Retired Employees 
 
During the year ended June 30, 2018, the City implemented the provisions of GASB Statement No. 75, Accounting 
and Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions (“GASB 75”). The City is required to 
report the actuarially accrued cost of post-employment benefits, other than pension benefits (“OPEB”), such as health 
and life insurance for current and future retirees.  GASB 75 addresses reporting by governments that provide OPEB 
by measuring and recognizing net assets or liabilities, deferred outflows of resources, deferred inflows of resources, 
and expenses/expenditures related to OPEB provided through defined benefit OPEB plans.  See Note 1 in APPENDIX 
D – “CITY OF CHANDLER, ARIZONA – AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 
JUNE 30, 2020” for further information. 
 
The City’s employees, their spouses and survivors may be eligible for certain retiree healthcare benefits under 
healthcare programs provided by the City.  Employees on long-term disability and their spouses may also qualify for 
retiree healthcare benefits through the City.  It is expected that substantially all City employees that reach normal or 
early retirement age while working for the City will become eligible for such benefits.  Currently, such retirees may 
obtain the healthcare benefits offered by the City by paying 100% of the applicable premium.  Although the retirees 
pay 100% of their premium, the retirees’ participation in the City’s healthcare program affects the City’s healthcare 
costs for its employees and results in an implicit rate subsidy. 
 
The City provides other post-employment benefits to its retirees that consist of an implicit subsidy for healthcare and 
a retirement health savings (RHS) plan for reimbursement of eligible medical expenses.  The City offers the RHS plan 
to employees and contributes toward a savings plan for each employee that they are eligible to use for medical expense 
reimbursement at separation from service.  The City makes no contribution to the retirees' premiums other than 
allowing them to participate through the City's pooled benefits.  By providing retirees with access to the City's 
healthcare plans based on the same rates it charges to active employees, the City is in effect providing an implicit 
subsidy to retirees.  This implicit subsidy exists because, on average, retiree healthcare costs are higher than active 
employee healthcare costs.  Because the City does not contribute anything toward this plan in advance, the City 
employs a pay-as-you-go method through paying the higher rate for active employees each year. 
 
The City’s net OPEB liability as of June 30, 2020 is $53,112,727 and is reflected on the Balance Sheet in the City's 
Financial Statements.  This is calculated based on the annual required contribution (ARC) of the employer, an amount 
actuarially determined which represents a level of funding that is paid on an ongoing basis, and projected to cover 
normal cost each year to amortize the unfunded actuarial liability over a period not to exceed thirty years.  
 
 
PROPERTY TAXES 
 
General 
 
For tax purposes in Arizona, real property and improvements and personal property is either valued by the Maricopa 
County Assessor (the “Assessor of the County”) or the Arizona Department of Revenue.  Property valued by the 
Assessor of the County is referred to as “locally assessed” property and generally encompasses residential, agricultural 
and traditional commercial and industrial property.  Property valued by the Arizona Department of Revenue is referred 
to as “centrally valued” property and is generally large mine and utility entities.   
 
Locally assessed property has two different values, Limited Property Value and Full Cash Value (both as defined 
below).  Limited Property Value is used as the basis for taxation.  Full Cash Value is used as the ceiling for determining

B-12 
Limited Property Value and for determining debt limits for certain local governmental entities including for school 
districts. 
 
For centrally valued property and personal property (except mobile homes), Full Cash Value of the property is the 
basis for taxation of such property and for determining constitutional and statutory debt limits for most local 
governmental entities. 
 
“Limited Property Value” means, for property in existence in the prior year, the lesser of (a) the Full Cash Value of 
the property or (b) an amount 5% greater than the Limited Property Value of such property determined for the prior 
year.  Limited Property Value is established at a level or percentage of Full Cash Value comparable to properties of 
the same or similar use or classification for property erroneously totally or partially omitted from the property tax rolls 
in the prior year; property for which a change in use occurred; property modified by construction, destruction, or 
demolition since the preceding valuation year such that the total value of the modification is equal to or greater than 
15% of the Full Cash Value; and property that has been split, subdivided or consolidated, with variations depending 
on when the change occurred.  There is no limit on the growth of Full Cash Value. 
 
Primary Taxes 
 
Taxes levied for the maintenance and operation of counties, cities, towns, school districts, community college districts 
and the State are “primary taxes”.  These taxes are levied against the Net Assessed Limited Property Value (as defined 
below) of the taxing jurisdiction.  “Net Assessed Limited Property Value” is determined by excluding the value of 
property exempt from taxation from the Limited Property Value of locally assessed property and from Full Cash Value 
of centrally valued property and combining the resulting two amounts.   
 
The State does not currently levy ad valorem taxes but the State currently requires each county to levy a “State 
equalization assistance property tax” to provide equalization assistance to school districts in each county, which is 
used to offset the cost of State equalization to those school districts.   
 
The primary taxes levied by a county, city, town and community college district are constitutionally limited to a 
maximum increase of 2% over the maximum allowable prior year’s levy limit plus any taxes on property not subject 
to tax in the preceding year (e.g., new construction and property brought into the jurisdiction because of annexation).  
The 2% limitation does not apply to primary taxes levied on behalf of school districts. 
 
Primary taxes on residential property only are constitutionally limited to 1% of the Limited Property Value of such 
property.  This constitutional limitation on residential primary tax levies is implemented by reducing the school 
districts’ taxes.  To offset the effects of reduced school district property taxes, the State compensates the school 
districts by providing additional state aid or, in some counties, county taxpayers are required to make payments to 
offset the effects of reduced property taxes. 
 
Secondary Taxes 
 
Taxes levied for debt retirement (e.g., debt service on the City’s bonds), voter-approved budget overrides and 
maintenance and operation of special service districts such as sanitary, water conservation, fire, road improvement 
and career technical education districts are “secondary taxes”.  Like primary taxes, secondary taxes also are levied 
against the Net Assessed Limited Property Value of the taxing jurisdiction.  There is no limitation on annual levies 
for voter-approved bond indebtedness and certain special district assessments.  Pursuant to a statutory change effective 
in 2018, school districts subject to desegregation orders levy secondary property taxes in addition to secondary taxes 
levied for debt service or budget overrides.

B-13 
Assessment Ratios 
 
All property, both real and personal, is assigned a classification to determine its assessed valuation for tax purposes. 
Each legal classification is defined by property use and has an assessment ratio (a percentage factor) that is multiplied 
by the taxable value of the property -- Limited Property Value or Full Cash Value, as applicable -- to obtain the 
“Assessed Limited Property Value” or the “Full Cash Assessed Value,” respectively.  The current assessment ratios 
for each class of property are set forth by tax year in the following table. 
 
PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENT RATIOS 
Tax Year 2017 through Tax Year 2021 
 
 
Tax Year 
Property Classification (a) 
2017 
2018 
2019 
2020 
2021 
Mining, utilities, commercial and industrial 
18% 
18% 
18% 
18% 
18% 
Agriculture and vacant land  
15 
15 
15 
15 
15 
Owner occupied residential 
10 
10 
10 
10 
10 
Leased or rented residential 
10 
10 
10 
10 
10 
Railroad, private car company and airline 
    flight property (b) 
 
15 
 
14 
 
15 
 
15 
 
15 
 
 
 
 
(a) Additional property classifications exist, but seldom amount to a significant portion of a municipal body’s total 
valuation. 
 
(b) This percentage is determined annually pursuant to Section 42-15005, Arizona Revised Statutes. 
 
Source: 
State and County Abstract of the Assessment Roll, Arizona Department of Revenue. 
 
Tax Procedures 
 
The Arizona tax year is defined as the calendar year, although tax procedures begin prior to January 1 of the prior 
fiscal year and continue through May of such fiscal year, when payment of the second installment of property taxes 
for the tax year becomes delinquent.   
 
The first step in the tax process is the determination of the Full Cash Value of each parcel of real property within the 
State.  “Full Cash Value” is statutorily defined to mean “the value determined as prescribed by statute” or if a statutory 
method is not prescribed it is “synonymous with market value.”  “Market Value” means that estimate of value that is 
derived annually by use of standard appraisal methods and techniques, which generally includes the market approach, 
the cost approach and the income approach.  As a general matter, the various county assessors use a cost approach for 
commercial/industrial property and a market approach for residential property.  Arizona law allows taxpayers to appeal 
the county assessor’s valuations by providing evidence of a lower value, which may be based upon another valuation 
approach. 
 
In valuing centrally valued property, the Arizona Department of Revenue begins generally with information  provided 
by taxpayers and then applies procedures provided by State law.  Appeals are also allowed for such valuations. 
 
On or before the third Monday in August of each year, the Board of Supervisors of the County prepares the tax roll 
that sets forth the valuation by taxing district of all property in the County subject to taxation.  The Assessor of the 
County is required to complete the assessment roll by December 15th of the year prior to the levy.  This tax roll also 
shows the valuation and classification of each parcel of land located within the County for the tax year.  The tax roll 
is then forwarded to the Treasurer of the County.  With the various budgetary procedures having been completed by 
the governmental entities, the appropriate tax rate for each jurisdiction is then applied to the parcel of property in order 
to determine the total tax owed by each property owner.  Any subsequent decrease in the value of the tax roll as it 
existed on the date of the levy due to appeals or other reasons would reduce the amount of taxes received by each 
jurisdiction.

B-14 
The property tax lien on real property attaches on January 1 of the fiscal year the tax is levied.  Such lien is prior and 
superior to all other liens and encumbrances on the property subject to such tax except liens or encumbrances held by 
the State or liens for taxes accruing in any other years. 
 
In the event the County is expressly enjoined or prohibited by law from collecting taxes due from any taxpayer, such 
as may result from the bankruptcy of a taxpayer, any resulting deficiency could be collected in subsequent tax years 
by adjusting the City’s tax rate charged to non-bankrupt taxpayers during such subsequent tax years. 
 
Delinquent Tax Procedures  
 
The property taxes due to the City are billed, along with State and other taxes, in September of the calendar tax year 
and are due and payable in two installments on October 1 and March 1 and become delinquent on November 1 and 
May 1. Delinquent taxes are subject to an interest penalty of 16% per annum prorated monthly as of the first day of 
the month.  (However, delinquent interest is waived if a taxpayer, delinquent as to the November 1 payment, pays the 
entire year’s tax bill by December 31.)  After the close of the tax collection period, the Assessor of the County prepares 
a delinquent property tax list and the property so listed is subject to a tax lien sale in February of the succeeding year. 
In the event there is no purchaser for the tax lien at the sale, the tax lien is assigned to the State, and the property is 
reoffered for sale from time to time until such time as it is sold, subject to redemption, for an amount sufficient to 
cover all delinquent taxes. 
 
Three years after the sale of the tax lien, the tax lien certificate holder may bring an action in a court of competent 
jurisdiction to foreclose the right of redemption and, if the delinquent taxes plus accrued interest are not paid by the 
owner of record or any entity having a right to redeem, a judgment is entered ordering the Treasurer of the County to 
deliver a treasurer’s deed to the certificate holder as prescribed by law. 
 
It should be noted that in the event of a taxpayer filing for relief pursuant to the United States Bankruptcy Code (the 
“Bankruptcy Code”), the law is currently unsettled as to whether a lien can be attached against the taxpayer’s property 
for property taxes levied during the pending bankruptcy.  Such taxes might constitute an unsecured and possibly non-
interest bearing administrative expense payable only to the extent that the secured creditors of a taxpayer are over 
secured, and then possibly only on the prorated basis with other allowed administrative claims. It cannot be 
determined, therefore, what adverse impact bankruptcy might have on the ability to collect ad valorem taxes on 
property of a taxpayer within the City.  Proceeds to pay such taxes come only from the taxpayer or from a sale of the 
tax lien on delinquent property. 
 
It cannot be determined what impact any deterioration of the financial conditions of any taxpayer, whether or not 
protection under the Bankruptcy Code is sought, may have on payment of or the secondary market for bonds issued 
by the City.  None of the City, the Financial Advisor or their respective attorneys, agents or consultants has undertaken 
any independent investigation of the operations and financial condition of any taxpayer, nor have they assumed 
responsibility for the same.

B-15 
Real and Secured Property Taxes Levied and Collected (a) 
 
 
__________________  
 
(a) Taxes are certified and collected by the Treasurer of the County.  Taxes in support of debt service are levied by 
the Board of Supervisors of the County as required by Arizona Revised Statutes.  Delinquent taxes are subject to 
an interest and penalty charge of 16% per annum which is prorated at a monthly rate of 1.33%.  Delinquent interest 
is waived if a taxpayer, delinquent as to the November 1 payment pays the entire year’s tax bill by December 31.  
Interest and penalty collections for delinquent taxes are not included in the collection figures above, but are 
deposited in the County General Fund. 
 
(b) The Tax Levy is adjusted downward in future years after the initial levy as a result of successful taxpayer appeals.  
The Tax Levy, net of resolutions (as presented in the Maricopa County Treasurer’s Office report), is noted in this 
presentation. 
 
(c) In the process of collection. 
 
SPECIAL NOTE: The assessed valuation of property owned by the Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and 
Power District (“SRP”) is not included in the assessed valuation of the City in the prior table or in any other valuation 
information set forth in this Official Statement. Because of SRP’s quasi-governmental nature, property owned by SRP 
is exempt from property taxation. 
 
However, SRP may elect each year to make voluntary contributions in lieu of property taxes with respect to certain of 
its electrical facilities (the “SRP Electric Plant”). If SRP elects to make the in lieu contribution for the year, the full 
cash value of the SRP Electric Plant and the in lieu contribution amount is determined in the same manner as the full 
cash value and property taxes owed is determined for similar non-governmental public utility property, with certain 
special deductions.  
 
If after electing to make the in lieu contribution, SRP then failed to make the in lieu contribution when due, the 
Treasurer of the County and the City have no recourse against the property of SRP and the City. 
 
Since 1964, when the in lieu contribution was originally authorized in State statute, SRP has never failed to make that 
election. The fiscal year 2021-22 in lieu assessed valuation of SRP within the City is $43,273,000 which represents 
approximately 1.25% of the combined Net Assessed Limited Property Value in the City.  SRP’s total contribution in 
lieu of property tax payments (primary & secondary) was $443,311 for fiscal year 2018-19 and $434,953 for  
2019-20. 
 
Source: 
Treasurer of the County. 
 
 
 
Collected to June 30 of
Cumulative Collection
Fiscal
Initial Fiscal Year
to June 30, 2021
Year
Tax Levy (b)
Amount
% of Levy
Amount
% of Levy
2020-21
36,379,535
$        
36,041,018
$         
99.07
         
36,041,018
$        
99.07
         
2019-20
33,976,882
          
33,597,309
           
98.88
         
33,966,438
          
99.97
         
2018-19
32,097,385
          
31,714,236
           
98.81
         
31,891,123
          
99.36
         
2017-18
30,545,951
          
30,321,359
           
99.26
         
30,540,759
          
99.98
         
2016-17
29,471,064
          
27,952,666
           
94.85
         
29,466,097
          
99.98
         
%

B-16 
Direct and Overlapping Assessed Valuations and Total Tax Rates  
Per $100 Assessed Valuation 
 
 Overlapping Jurisdiction 
2021-22 
Net Assessed 
Limited 
Property Value 
2021-22 
Combined Primary 
and Secondary Tax   
Rates Per $100 
Net Assessed Limited 
Property Value 
 
 
 
State of Arizona 
 $74,200,233,397 
None 
Maricopa County 
48,724,126,672 
$1.8435 (a) 
Maricopa County Community College District 
48,724,126,672 
1.2881 
Maricopa County Library District 
48,724,126,672 
0.0556 
Maricopa County Flood Control District (b) 
42,084,633,673 
0.0090 
Maricopa County Fire District Assistance Tax 
48,724,126,672 
0.1792 
Maricopa County Special Health Care District  
48,724,126,672 
0.3046 
Central Arizona Water Conservation District (c) 
48,724,126,672 
0.1400 
East Valley Institute of Technology District No. 401(d) 
23,998,252,082 
0.0500 
Chandler Unified School District No. 80  
3,374,230,827 
6.4111 
Tempe Union High School District No. 213  
4,201,600,213 
2.4991 
Kyrene Elementary School District No. 28  
2,412,625,402 
3.7820 
Mesa Unified School District No. 4  
3,544,450,333 
7.3696 
Gilbert Unified School District No. 41  
2,356,761,360 
6.2580 
City of Chandler 
3,463,794,661 
1.1201 
 
 
 
(a) Includes the State Equalization Assistance Property tax.  This rate has been set at $0.4426 for fiscal year 2020-21 
and is adjusted annually pursuant to Arizona Revised Statues, Section 41-1276. 
 
(b) The assessed value of the Maricopa County Flood Control District does not include the personal property assessed 
value of the County. 
 
(c) Value shown for the Central Arizona Water Conservation District covers only the County portion of such district. 
 
(d) Includes Net Assessed Limited Property Value for the East Valley Institute of Technology District No. 401 within 
Pinal County. 
 
Source: 
Property Tax Rates and Assessed Values, Arizona Tax Research Foundation. 
 
 
 
 
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank.]

B-17 
Property Value by Property Classification 
 
Set forth below is a breakdown of the Net Full Cash Assessed Property Valuation of the City by property classification. 
 
Class 
2017-18 
2018-19 
2019-20 
2020-21 
2021-22 
Commercial, industrial,  
     utilities and mines 
 $1,027,345,767 
 $ 1,102,515,089 
 $ 1,246,170,328 
 $ 1,412,928,374 
$  1,488,882,870 
Agricultural and vacant 
74,055,978 
75,266,539 
78,888,739 
77,850,859 
76,801,910 
Residential (owner occupied) 
1,472,336,279 
1,574,405,659 
1,681,112,768 
1,837,472,779 
1,990,237,285 
Residential (rental) 
574,699,601 
646,538,541 
738,411,405 
847,104,454 
946,787,996 
Railroad 
1,910,025 
1,782,690 
1,910,025 
2,011,500 
2,011,500 
Historical property 
156,435,042 
88,612,464 
124,084,500 
130,572,188 
177,317,246 
Commercial historical property 
-    
 -    
 -    
-    
-    
Certain Government  
    property improvements 
432,241 
383,733 
400,055 
477,042 
520,137 
Totals (a) 
$3,307,214,933 
$3,489,504,715 
$3,870,977,820 
$4,308,417,196 
$ 4,682,558,944 
 
 
 
Source: 
State and County Abstract of the Assessment Roll, Arizona Department of Revenue. 
 
Net Assessed Limited Property Value of Major Taxpayers 
 
 
 
 
 
Some of the major taxpayers, including Intel Corporation, NXP, and Wells Fargo Bank NA are subject to the 
informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and in 
accordance therewith file the Filings with the Commission.  The Filings may be inspected and copies are available at 
the public reference facilities maintained by the Commission.  In addition, the Filings may also be inspected at the 
offices of the New York Stock Exchange at 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.  The Filings may also be 
obtained through the Internet on the Commission’s EDGAR database at http://www.sec.gov.  Neither the City, nor 
the Financial Advisor or their respective agents or consultants has examined the information set forth in the Filings 
for accuracy or completeness, nor do they assume responsibility for the same. 
 
Source: 
County Assessor’s Office. 
 
As %  of
City’s Total
2021-22
2021-22
Net Assessed Limited
Net Assessed Limited
Taxpayer (a)
Description
Property Value
Property Value
Intel Corporation                            
Manufacturing Plant
$168,730,977
4.87%
NXP USA Inc
Manufacturing Plant
10,177,870
0.29%
Oracle America Inc
Corporation Service Company
4,767,196
0.14%
Air Products & Chemicals Inc
Industrial Gas Manufacturing
4,591,588
0.13%
Dell Equipment Funding LP
Corporation Service Company
3,675,016
0.11%
Cox Communications Arizona LLC
Communications
3,047,562
0.09%
Microsoft Corporation
Corporate Sales Office
2,554,402
0.07%
Williams Scotsman Inc
Contracting
2,358,990
0.07%
Rogers Corporation
Microwave Substrates
2,329,784
0.07%
Wells Fargo Bank
Financial Services
2,104,110
0.06%
Total
$204,337,495
5.90%
Total City Net Assessed Limited Property Value
$3,463,794,661

B-18 
Property Values 
 
The tables below list the various property values for the City for fiscal year 2017-18 through 2021-22.  All values 
herein are net of the estimated value of property exempt from taxation.  
 
Property Values for Fiscal Year 2017-18 through 2021-22 
 
Fiscal 
Year 
Net Assessed 
Limited 
Property Value 
Net Full Cash 
Assessed Value 
Estimated Net 
Full Cash Value (a) 
2021-22 
$  3,463,794,661 
$  4,682,558,944 
$  40,751,143,934 
2020-21 
3,243,434,243 
4,308,417,196 
36,949,424,457 
2019-20 
3,011,152,689 
3,870,977,820 
33,312,389,044 
2018-19 
2,783,830,922 
3,489,504,715 
29,847,787,490 
2017-18 
2,675,480,112 
3,307,214,933 
28,994,678,811 
_______________________ 
 
(a) 
Estimated Net Full Cash Value is the total estimated “market value” of taxable property, which is calculated 
by multiplying the Full Cash Value by the ratio of Net Assessed Full Cash Value divided by the Assessed 
Full Cash Value.  Each value as reported by the Assessor of the County in the State Abstract. 
 
Source: 
State and County Abstract of the Assessment Roll, Arizona Department of Revenue. 
 
Net Assessed Limited Property Value and Net Full Cash Assessed Value Comparisons and Trends 
 
The tables below are shown to indicate for fiscal year 2017-18 through 2021-22, the (i) Net Assessed Limited Property 
Values and (ii) Net Full Cash Values, of the City, the County and the State of Arizona, each on a comparative basis. 
 
Comparative Net Assessed Limited Property Value Histories 
 
Fiscal 
Year 
City of 
Chandler 
Percent 
Increase/ 
(Decrease) 
Maricopa 
County 
Percent 
Increase/ 
(Decrease) 
State of 
Arizona 
Percent 
Increase/ 
(Decrease) 
2021-22 
$3,463,794,661 
6.79% 
$48,724,126,672 
6.61% 
$74,200,233,397 
6.13% 
2020-21 
3,243,434,243 
7.71 
45,704,969,813 
5.81 
69,914,763,468 
5.68 
2019-20 
3,011,152,689 
8.17 
43,194,326,395 
6.86 
66,154,632,834 
6.14 
2018-19 
2,783,830,922 
4.05 
40,423,232,421 
5.72 
62,328,357,186 
4.92 
2017-18 
2,675,480,112 
4.76 
38,236,246,402 
5.63 
59,404,007,785 
2.10 
 __________________  
 
Source: 
Property Tax Rates and Assessed Values, Arizona Tax Research Association and Abstract and Assessment 
Roll, State of Arizona Department of Revenue. 
 
 
Comparative Net Full Cash Value Histories 
 
Fiscal 
Year 
City of 
Chandler 
Percent 
Increase/ 
(Decrease) 
Maricopa 
County  
Percent 
Increase/ 
(Decrease) 
State of  
Arizona 
Percent 
Increase/ 
(Decrease) 
2021-22 
$4,682,558,944 
8.68% 
$67,535,008,138 
9.24% 
N/A 
N/A 
2020-21 
4,308,417,196 
11.30 
61,824,712,434 
9.25 
N/A 
N/A 
2019-20 
3,870,977,820 
10.93 
56,588,192,576 
8.94 
N/A 
N/A 
2018-19 
3,489,504,715 
5.51 
51,944,549,119 
7.45 
N/A 
N/A 
2017-18 
3,307,214,933 
4.42 
48,343,820,221 
7.69 
N/A 
N/A 
 __________________  
 
Source: 
Abstract and Assessment Roll, State of Arizona Department of Revenue

C-1 
APPENDIX C 
 
FORM OF APPROVING LEGAL OPINION 
 
 
 
______, 2021 
 
MAYOR AND COUNCIL 
CITY OF CHANDLER, ARIZONA 
 
 
We have examined the transcript of proceedings relating to the issuance by the City of Chandler, 
Arizona (the “City”), of its $_____________ aggregate original principal amount of City of Chandler, Arizona, 
General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Taxable Series 2021 (the “Bonds”), dated the date of initial delivery and 
maturing on July 1 of the years 2022 through and including 2028. 
 
 
As to questions of fact material to our opinion, we have relied upon, and assumed due and continuing 
compliance with the provisions of, the proceedings and other documents, and have relied upon certifications, 
covenants and representations furnished to us without undertaking to verify the same by independent investigation. 
 
 
Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion, as of this date, which is the date of initial delivery 
of the Bonds against payment therefor, that: 
 
 
1. 
The Bonds are valid and binding general obligations of the City. 
 
 
2. 
All taxable property within the City is subject to the levy of a direct, annual, ad valorem 
tax to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds without limit as to rate, except that the total aggregate of taxes 
levied to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds, in the aggregate, shall not exceed the total aggregate amount 
of principal and interest to become due on the bonds being refunded from the date of issuance of the Bonds to the final 
date of maturity of the bonds being refunded; and subject further to the rights vested in the owners of such bonds being 
refunded to the payment of such bonds being refunded from the same tax source in the event of a deficiency in the 
moneys and obligations issued by or guaranteed by the United States of America purchased from the proceeds of the 
sale of such Bonds and placed in trust for the purpose of providing for payment of principal of and premium and 
interest on such bonds being refunded.  The owners of the Bonds must rely on the sufficiency of the moneys and 
obligations placed irrevocably in trust for payment of the bonds being refunded.  Subject to the foregoing, it is required 
by law that there be levied, assessed and collected, in the same manner as other taxes of the City, an annual tax upon 
the taxable property in the City sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds when due. 
 
 
3. 
Interest income on the Bonds is subject to federal income taxes.  We express no opinion 
regarding other federal tax consequences arising with respect to the Bonds.  
 
 
4. 
Under existing laws, regulations, rulings and judicial decisions, the interest income on the 
Bonds is exempt from Arizona income taxes. 
 
 
The rights of the owners of the Bonds and the enforceability of those rights may be subject to 
bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and similar laws affecting creditors’ rights and the enforcement 
of those rights may be subject to the exercise of judicial discretion in accordance with general principles of equity. 
 
 
 
 
GUST ROSENFELD P.L.C. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Timothy A. Stratton 
 
 
 
Bond Counsel

D-1 
APPENDIX D 
 
 
CITY OF CHANDLER, ARIZONA 
 
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2020 
 
The following audited financial statements are for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020. These are the most recent 
audited financial statements available to the City. These audited financial statements may not represent the current 
financial conditions of the City. The City did not request the consent of Heinfeld, Meech & Co., P.C. to include its 
report and Heinfeld, Meech & Co., P.C. has performed no procedures subsequent to rendering its opinion on the 
audited financial statements.

E-1 
APPENDIX E 
 
BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY SYSTEM 
 
The description set forth below of the procedures and record-keeping with respect to beneficial ownership interests 
in the Bonds, payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on, the Bonds to Direct Participants, Indirect 
Participants and Beneficial Owners (each as hereinafter defined), and other information concerning DTC and the 
book-entry-only system of registration and transfer of beneficial ownership interests in the Bonds is based solely on 
information furnished by DTC to the City for inclusion in this Official Statement. Neither the City, the Bond Registrar 
and Paying Agent, the Financial Advisor, nor their agents or counsel make any representations as to the accuracy or 
completeness thereof. 
 
The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), New York, NY, will act as securities depository for the Bonds.  The Bonds 
will be issued as fully-registered securities registered in the name of Cede & Co. (DTC’s partnership nominee) or such 
other name as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC.  One fully-registered Bond will be issued 
for the Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of such issue, and will be deposited with DTC.   
 
DTC, the world’s largest securities depository, is a limited-purpose trust company organized under the New York 
Banking Law, a “banking organization” within the meaning of the New York Banking Law, a member of the Federal 
Reserve System, a “clearing corporation” within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code, and a 
“clearing agency” registered pursuant to the provisions of Section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  DTC 
holds and provides asset servicing for over 3.5 million issues of U.S. and non-U.S. equity issues, corporate and 
municipal debt issues, and money market instruments (from over 100 countries) that DTC’s participants (“Direct 
Participants”) deposit with DTC.  DTC also facilitates the post-trade settlement among Direct Participants of sales 
and other securities transactions in deposited securities, through electronic computerized book-entry transfers and 
pledges between Direct Participants’ accounts.  This eliminates the need for physical movement of securities 
certificates.  Direct Participants include both U.S. and non-U.S. securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, 
clearing corporations, and certain other organizations.  DTC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Depository Trust & 
Clearing Corporation (“DTCC”).  DTCC is the holding company for DTC, National Securities Clearing Corporation 
and Fixed Income Clearing Corporation, all of which are registered clearing agencies.  DTCC is owned by the users 
of its regulated subsidiaries.  Access to the DTC system is also available to others such as both U.S. and n on-U.S. 
securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, and clearing corporations that clear through or maintain a 
custodial relationship with a Direct Participant, either directly or indirectly (“Indirect Participants”).  DTC has a 
Standard & Poor’s rating of AA+.  The DTC Rules applicable to its Participants are on file with the Securities and 
Exchange Commission.  More information about DTC can be found at www.dtcc.com. 
 
Purchases of Bonds under the DTC system must be made by or through Direct Participants, which will receive a credit 
for the Bonds on DTC’s records.  The ownership interest of each actual purchaser of each Security (“Beneficial 
Owner”) is in turn to be recorded on the Direct and Indirect Participants’ records.  Beneficial owners will not receive 
written confirmation from DTC of their purchaser.  Beneficial Owners are, however, expected to receive written 
confirmations providing details of the transaction, as well as periodic statements of their holdings, from the Direct or 
Indirect Participant through which the Beneficial Owner entered into the transaction.  Transfers of ownership interests 
in the Bonds are to be accomplished by entries made on the books of Direct and Indirect Participants acting on behalf 
of Beneficial Owners.  Beneficial owners will not receive certificates representing their ownership interests in Bonds, 
except in the event that use of the book-entry system for the Bonds is discontinued. 
 
To facilitate subsequent transfers, all Bonds deposited by Direct Participants with DTC are registered in the name of 
DTC’s partnership nominee, Cede & Co., or such other name as may be requested by an authorized representative of 
DTC.  The deposit of Bonds with DTC and their registration in the name of Cede & Co. or such other DTC nominee 
do not effect any change in beneficial ownership.  DTC has no knowledge of the actual Beneficial Owners of the 
Bonds; DTC’s records reflect only the identity of the Direct Participants to whose accounts such Bonds are credited, 
which may or may not be the Beneficial Owners.  The Direct and Indirect Participants will remain responsible for 
keeping account of their holdings on behalf of their customers.

E-2 
Conveyance of notices and other communications by DTC to Direct Participants, by Direct Participants to Indirect 
Participants, and by Direct Participants and Indirect Participants to Beneficial Owners will be governed by 
arrangements among them, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time.   
 
Redemption notices shall be sent to DTC.  If less than all of the Bonds within an issue are being redeemed, DTC’s 
practice is to determine by lot the amount of the interest of each Direct Participant in such issue to be redeemed. 
 
Neither DTC nor Cede & Co. (nor any other DTC nominee) will consent or vote with respect to Bonds unless 
authorized by a Direct Participant in accordance with DTC’s MMI Procedures.  Under its usual procedures, DTC 
mails an Omnibus Proxy to Issuer as soon as possible after the record date.  The Omnibus Proxy assigns Cede & Co.’s 
consenting or voting rights to those Direct Participants to whose accounts Bonds are credited on the record date 
(identified in a listing attached to the Omnibus Proxy). 
 
Redemption proceeds, distributions, and dividend payments on the Bonds will be made to Cede & Co., or such other 
nominee as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC.  DTC’s practice is to credit Direct Participants’ 
accounts upon DTC’s receipt of funds and corresponding detail information from Issuer or Agent, on payable date in 
accordance with their respective holdings shown on DTC’s records.  Payments by participants to Beneficial owners 
will be governed by standing instructions and customary practices, as is the case with securities held for the accounts 
of customers in bearer form or registered in “street name,” and will be the responsibility of such Participant and not 
of DTC, Agent, or Issuer, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time.  
Payment of redemption proceeds, distributions, and dividend payments to Cede & Co. (or such other nominee as may 
be requested by an authorized representative of DTC) is the responsibility of Issuer or Agent, disbursement of such 
payments to Direct Participants will be the responsibility of DTC, and disbursements of such payments to the 
Beneficial Owners will be the responsibility of Direct and Indirect Participants. 
 
A Beneficial Owner shall give notice to elect to have its Bonds purchased or tendered, through its Participant, to Bond 
Registrar and Paying Agent, and shall effect delivery of such Bonds by causing the Direct Participant to transfer the 
Participant’s interest in the Bonds, on DTC’s records, to Bond Registrar and Paying Agent.  The requirement for 
physical delivery of Bonds in connection with an optional tender or a mandatory purchase will be deemed satisfied 
when the ownership rights in the Bonds are transferred by Direct Participants on DTC’s records and followed by a 
book-entry credit of tendered Bonds to the Bond Registrar and Paying Agent’s DTC account. 
 
DTC may discontinue providing its services as depository with respect to the Bonds at any time by giving reasonable 
notice to the City or Bond Registrar and Paying Agent.  Under such circumstances, in the event that a successor 
depository is not obtained, Bond certificates are required to be printed and delivered. 
 
The City may decide to discontinue use of the system of book-entry-only transfers through DTC (or a successor 
securities depository).  In that event, Bond certificates will be printed and delivered to DTC. 
 
The information in this section concerning DTC and DTC’s book-entry-only system has been obtained from sources 
that the City believes to be reliable, but the City, the Financial Advisor or their counsel or agents takes no responsibility 
for the accuracy thereof. 
 
NEITHER THE CITY, THE BOND REGISTRAR AND PAYING AGENT, THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR, NOR 
THEIR AGENTS OR COUNSEL HAVE ANY RESPONSIBILITY OR OBLIGATION TO ANY DIRECT 
PARTICIPANT, INDIRECT PARTICIPANT OR TO ANY BENEFICIAL OWNER WITH RESPECT TO:  (I) THE 
BONDS, (II) THE ACCURACY OF ANY RECORDS MAINTAINED BY DTC OR ANY DIRECT PARTICIPANT 
OR INDIRECT PARTICIPANT; (III) THE TIMELY OR ULTIMATE PAYMENT BY DTC OR ANY DIRECT 
PARTICIPANT OR INDIRECT PARTICIPANT OF ANY AMOUNT DUE TO ANY BENEFICIAL OWNER IN 
RESPECT OF THE PRINCIPAL OR REDEMPTION PRICE OF OR OF INTEREST ON THE BONDS; (IV) THE 
TRANSMITTAL BY DIRECT PARTICIPANTS OR INDIRECT PARTICIPANTS OF ANY NOTICE W HICH IS 
PERMITTED OR REQUIRED TO BE GIVEN TO  BONDHOLDERS; (V) ANY CONSENT GIVEN BY DTC OR 
OTHER ACTION TAKEN BY DTC AS REGISTERED OWNER; OR (VI) THE SELECTION BY DTC OR ANY 
DIRECT PARTICIPANT OR INDIRECT PARTICIPANT OF ANY BENEFICIAL OWNERS TO RECEIVE 
PAYMENT IN THE EVENT OF A PARTIAL REDEMPTION OF THE BONDS.

4041601.2 
3 
APPENDIX F 
$48,610,000* 
CITY OF CHANDLER, ARIZONA 
GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS,  
TAXABLE SERIES 2021 
 
CONTINUING DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE 
(CUSIP Base No. 158843) 
 
This Continuing Disclosure Certificate (this “Disclosure Certificate”) is undertaken by the City of Chandler, 
Arizona (the “City”) in connection with the issuance of its Taxable General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2021 
(the “Bonds”).  In consideration of the initial sale and delivery of the Bonds, the City covenants as follows: 
 
Section 1. 
Purpose of the Disclosure Certificate.  This Disclosure Certificate is for the benefit of the 
Bondholders and in order to assist the Participating Underwriter (as hereinafter defined) in complying with the Rule 
(as hereinafter defined). 
Section 2. 
Definitions.  Any capitalized term used herein shall have the following meanings, unless 
otherwise defined herein: 
“Annual Report” shall mean the annual report provided by the City pursuant to, and as described in, Sections 
3 and 4 of this Disclosure Certificate. 
 
“Audited Financial Statements” shall mean the City’s annual financial statements, which are currently 
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for governmental units as prescribed 
by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) and which the City intends to continue to prepare in 
substantially the same form. 
 
“Bond Counsel” shall mean Gust Rosenfeld P.L.C. or such other nationally recognized bond counsel as may 
be selected by the City. 
“Bondholder” shall mean any registered owner or beneficial owner of the Bonds. 
“Dissemination Agent” shall mean the City or any person designated in writing by the City as the 
Dissemination Agent. 
 
“EMMA” shall mean the Electronic Municipal Market Access system of MSRB, or any successor thereto 
approved by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, as a repository for municipal continuing 
disclosure information pursuant to the Rule. 
 
 
“Financial Obligation” shall mean (i) a debt obligation; (ii) a derivative instrument entered into in connection 
with, or pledged as security or a source of payment for, an existing or planned debt obligation; or (iii) a guarantee of 
(i) or (ii), except that “Financial Obligation” does not include municipal securities as to which a final official statement 
has been provided to the MSRB consistent with the Rule. 
 
“Listed Events” shall mean any of the events listed in Section 5 of this Disclosure Certificate. 
 
“MSRB” shall mean the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, or any successor thereto. 
 
“Official Statement” shall mean the final official statement dated [_________, 2021] relating to the Bonds. 
                                                                 
* Preliminary, subject to change.

4041601.2 
4 
“Participating Underwriter” shall mean any of the original underwriters of the Bonds required to comply 
with the Rule in connection with the offering of the Bonds. 
“Rule” shall mean Rule 15c2-12(b)(5) adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as the same may be amended from time to time. 
Section 3. 
Provision of Annual Reports. 
(a) 
The City shall, or shall cause the Dissemination Agent to, not later than February 1 of each year (the 
“Filing Date”), commencing February 1, 2022, provide electronically to MSRB, in a format prescribed by MSRB, an 
Annual Report for the fiscal year ending on the preceding June 30 which is consistent with the requirements of 
Section 4 of this Disclosure Certificate. Should the City’s fiscal year change to something other than July 1 to June 
30, then the Annual Report will be provided not later than seven months after the end of such fiscal year.  Currently, 
filings are required to be made with EMMA.  Notice of any such change in the City’s fiscal year will be filed with 
EMMA. Not later than 15 business days prior to such Filing Date, the City shall provide the Annual Report to the 
Dissemination Agent (if other than the City). 
(b) 
If the City is unable or for any reason fails to provide electronically to EMMA an Annual Report or 
any part thereof by the Filing Date required in subsection (a) above, the City shall, in a timely manner, send a notice 
to EMMA in substantially the form attached as Exhibit A not later than such Filing Date. 
(c) 
If the City’s audited financial statements are not submitted with the Annual Report and the City fails 
to provide to EMMA a copy of its audited financial statements within 30 days of receipt thereof by the City, then the 
City shall, in a timely manner, send a notice to EMMA in substantially the form attached as Exhibit B. 
(d) 
The Dissemination Agent shall: 
 
(i) 
Determine each year prior to the date(s) for providing the Annual Report and audited financial 
statements the proper address of EMMA; and  
 
(ii) 
If the Dissemination Agent is other than the City, file a report or reports with the City certifying 
that the Annual Report and Audited Financial Statements, if applicable, have been provided pursuant to this Disclosure 
Certificate, stating the date such information was provided and listing where it was provided. 
Section 4. 
Content of Annual Reports.  
(a) 
The Annual Report may be submitted as a single document or as separate documents comprising an 
electronic package, and may incorporate by reference other information as provided in this Section, including the 
Audited Financial Statements of the City; provided, however, that if the Audited Financial Statements of the City are 
not available at the time of the filing of the Annual Report, the City shall file unaudited financial statements of the 
City with the Annual Report and, when the Audited Financial Statements of the City are available, the same shall be 
submitted to EMMA within 30 days of receipt thereof by the City. 
(b) 
The City’s Annual Report shall contain or incorporate by reference the following: 
 
(i) 
Type of Financial and Operating Data to be Provided: 
 
(A) 
Subject to the provisions of Sections 3 and 4(a) hereof, annual Audited Financial 
Statements for the City. 
 
(B) 
Annually updated financial information and operating data of the type contained in the 
following subsections of the Official Statement: 
(1) 
Estimated Net Full Cash Value and Assessed Values; 
(2) 
Statements of Bonds Outstanding;

4041601.2 
5 
(3) 
Property Tax Assessment Ratios; 
(4) 
Real and Secured Property Taxes Levied and Collected; 
(5) 
Direct and Overlapping Tax Rates per $100 Assessed Valuation; 
(6) 
Property Value by Property Classification; 
(7) 
Net Limited Property Assessed Valuation of Major Taxpayers. 
 
 
(C) 
In the event of an amendment pursuant to Section 8 of this Disclosure Certificate not 
previously described in an Annual Report, an explanation, in narrative form, of the reasons for the amendment 
and the impact of the change in the type of operating data or financial information being provided and, if the 
amendment is made to the accounting principles to be followed, a comparison between the financial statements 
or information prepared on the basis of the new accounting principles and those prepared on the basis of the 
former accounting principles, including a qualitative discussion of the differences, and the impact on the 
presentation and, to the extent feasible, a quantitative comparison. 
 
(ii) 
Accounting Principles Pursuant to Which Audited Financial Statements Shall Be Prepared:  The 
Audited Financial Statements shall be prepared in accordance with GAAP and state law requirements as are in effect 
from time to time. A more complete description of the accounting principles currently followed in the preparation of 
the City’s Audited Financial Statements is contained in Note 1 of the Audited Financial Statement included within the 
Official Statement. 
Notice of amendment to the accounting principles shall be sent within 30 days to EMMA. 
(c) 
Any or all of the items listed above may be incorporated by reference from other documents, including 
official statements of debt issues of the City or related public entities, which have been submitted to EMMA or the 
Securities and Exchange Commission.  If the document incorporated by reference is a final official statement, it must 
be available from EMMA.  The City shall clearly identify each such other document so incorporated by reference.

4041601.2 
6 
Section 5. 
Reporting of Listed Events. 
(a) 
This Section shall govern the giving of notices by the City, either directly or by directing the 
Dissemination Agent to do so, of the occurrence of any of the following events with respect to the Bonds. The City 
shall in a timely manner, not in excess of 10 business days after the occurrence of the event, provide notice of the 
following events with EMMA: 
(i) 
Principal and interest payment delinquencies; 
(ii) 
Non-payment related defaults, if material; 
(iii) 
Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; 
(iv) 
Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; 
(v) 
Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; 
(vi) 
Adverse tax opinions, the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) of proposed 
or final determinations of taxability, Notices of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701-TEB) or 
other material notices or determinations with respect to the tax status of the Bonds, or other 
events affecting the tax status of the Bonds; 
(vii) 
Modifications to rights of Bondholders, if material; 
(viii) 
Bond calls, if material, and tender offers; 
(ix) 
Defeasances; 
(x) 
Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the Bonds, if material; 
(xi) 
Rating changes; 
(xii) 
Bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar event of the City; 
(xiii) 
The consummation of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition involving the City or the 
sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the City, other than in the ordinary course of 
business, the entry into a definitive agreement to undertake such an action or the 
termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to 
its terms, if material; 
(xiv) 
Appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee, if 
material; 
(xv) 
The incurrence of a Financial Obligation of the City, if material, or agreement to covenants, 
events of default, remedies, priority rights, or other similar terms of a Financial Obligation 
of the City, any of which affect Bondholders, if material; and 
(xvi) 
A default, event of acceleration, termination event, modification of terms, or other similar 
events under the terms of a Financial Obligation of the City, any of which reflect financial 
difficulties. 
 
(b) 
“Materiality” will be determined in accordance with the applicable federal securities laws. 
Note to Paragraph 5(a)(xii):  For the purposes of the event identified in paragraph (a)(xii) above, the event is 
considered to occur when any of the following occur: the appointment of a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer for 
the City in a proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or in any other proceeding under state or federal law in 
which a court or governmental authority has assumed jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the 
City, or if such jurisdiction has been assumed by leaving the existing governing body and officials or officers in 
possession but subject to the supervision and orders of a court or governmental authority, or the entry of an order 
confirming a plan or reorganization, arrangement or liquidation by a court or governmental authority having 
supervision or jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the City. 
Section 6. 
Termination of Reporting Obligation.  The City’s obligations under this Disclosure 
Certificate shall terminate upon the legal defeasance, prior redemption or payment in full of all of the Bonds.  Such 
termination shall not terminate the obligation of the City to give notice of such defeasance or prior redemption. 
Section 7. 
Dissemination Agent.  The City may, from time to time, appoint or engage a Dissemination 
Agent to assist it in carrying out its obligations under this Disclosure Certificate, and may discharge any such 
Dissemination Agent, with or without appointing a successor Dissemination Agent.  
Section 8. 
Amendment.  Notwithstanding any other provision of this Disclosure Certificate, the City 
may amend this Disclosure Certificate if:

4041601.2 
7 
(a) 
The amendment is made in connection with a change in circumstances that arises from a 
change in legal requirements, change in law, or change in identity, nature or status of the City, or the type of 
business conducted; 
(b) 
This Disclosure Certificate, as amended, would, in the opinion of Bond Counsel, have complied with 
the requirements of the Rule at the time of the primary offering of the Bonds, after taking into account any amendments 
or interpretations of the Rule, as well as any change in circumstances; and  
(c) 
The amendment does not materially impair the interests of Bondholders, as determined by Bond 
Counsel. 
 
Section 9. 
Filing with EMMA.  The City shall, or shall cause the Dissemination Agent to, electronically 
file all items required to be filed with EMMA. 
 
Section 10. 
Additional Information.  The City may, at the City’s election, include any information in 
any Annual Report or notice of occurrence of a Listed Event in addition to that which is specifically required by this 
Disclosure Certificate.  If the City chooses to include such information, the City shall have no obligation under this 
Disclosure Certificate to update such information or include it in any future Annual Report or notice of occurrence of 
a Listed Event. 
Section 11. 
Default.  In the event of a failure of the City to comply with any provision of this Disclosure 
Certificate, any Bondholder may seek specific performance by court order to cause the City to comply with its 
obligations under this Disclosure Certificate.  The sole remedy under this Disclosure Certificate in the event of any 
failure of the City to comply with this Disclosure Certificate shall be an action to compel performance and such failure 
shall not constitute a default under the Bonds or the resolution authorizing the Bonds. 
Section 12. 
Compliance by the City.  The City hereby covenants to comply with the terms of this 
Disclosure Certificate.  The City expressly acknowledges and agrees that compliance with the undertaking contained 
in this Disclosure Certificate is its sole responsibility and the responsibility of the Dissemination Agent, if any, and 
that such compliance, or monitoring thereof, is not the responsibility of, and no duty is present with respect thereto 
for, the Participating Underwriter, Bond Counsel or the City’s financial advisor. 
Section 13. 
Subject to Appropriation.  Pursuant to Arizona law, the City’s undertaking to provide 
information under this Disclosure Certificate is subject to appropriation to cover the costs of preparing and sending 
the Annual Report and notices of Listed Events to EMMA.  Should funds that would enable the City to provide the 
information required to be disclosed hereunder not be appropriated, then notice of such fact shall, in a timely manner, 
be sent to EMMA in substantially the form attached as Exhibit C. 
Section 14. 
Beneficiaries.  This Disclosure Certificate shall inure solely to the benefit of the City, the 
Dissemination Agent, the Participating Underwriter and the Bondholders, and shall create no rights in any other person 
or entity. 
Section 15. 
Governing Law and Interpretation of Terms.  This Disclosure Certificate shall be governed 
by the law of the State of Arizona and any action to enforce this Disclosure Certificate must be brought in an Arizona 
state court.  The terms and provisions of this Disclosure Certificate shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with 
the interpretation of such terms and provisions under the Rule and the federal securities law. 
[Signatures on following page]

4041601 
 
Date:  [__________, 2021]. 
 
CITY OF CHANDLER, ARIZONA 
 
 
 
 
By______________________________________ 
Its Management Services Director 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[Signature Page to Continuing Disclosure Certificate]

F-1 
 
EXHIBIT A 
 
NOTICE OF FAILURE TO FILE ANNUAL REPORT 
 
Name of Issuer:  
City of Chandler, Arizona  
Name of Bond Issue: 
[$__________] Taxable General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2021 
Dated Date of Bonds: 
[__________, 2021] 
Base CUSIP 158843 
 
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City has not provided an Annual Report with respect to the above-named 
Bonds as required by Section 3(a) of the Continuing Disclosure Certificate dated [__________, 2021].  The City 
anticipates that the Annual Report will be filed by ______________________. 
 
 
Dated:  ________________ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
City of Chandler, Arizona 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By____________________________________________ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Its ____________________________________________ 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- 
EXHIBIT B 
 
NOTICE OF FAILURE TO FILE AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
Name of Issuer:  
City of Chandler, Arizona  
Name of Bond Issue: 
[$__________] Taxable General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2021 
Dated Date of Bonds: 
[__________, 2021] 
Base CUSIP 158843  
 
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City failed to provide its Audited Financial Statements with its 
Annual Report or, if not then available, within 30 days of receipt as required by Section 4(a) of the Continuing 
Disclosure Certificate dated [__________, 2021], with respect to the above-named Bonds.  The City anticipates that 
the Audited Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, ____ will be filed by ______________________. 
 
Dated:  ________________ 
 
City of Chandler, Arizona 
 
 
By___________________________________________ 
 
Its ___________________________________________ 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
EXHIBIT C 
 
NOTICE OF FAILURE TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS 
 
Name of Issuer:  
City of Chandler, Arizona  
Name of Bond Issue: 
[$__________] Taxable General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2021 
Dated Date of Bonds: 
[__________, 2021] 
Base CUSIP 158843 
 
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City failed to appropriate funds necessary to perform the undertaking 
required by the Continuing Disclosure Certificate dated [__________, 2021]. 
 
 
Dated:  ________________ 
 
City of Chandler, Arizona 
 
 
By___________________________________________ 
 
Its ___________________________________________ 
 
[Exhibits to Continuing Disclosure Certificate]