March 16, 2022 Regular Meeting Minutes

Meeting Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular Meeting

March 16, 2022 | 5:30 p.m. | ae

Chandler City Council Chambers Fora, CHANDLER
88 E. Chicago St., Chandler, AZ Community of Innovation
Call to Order

The meeting was called to order by Chairman Heumann at 5:30 p.m.

Roll Call

Commission Attendance Staff Attendance

Chairman Rick Heumann David de la Torre, Planning Manager

Vice Chairman David Rose Lauren Schumann, Senior City Planner
Commissioner Erik Morgan Ben Cereceres, City Planner

Commissioner Sherri Koshiol Thomas Allen, Assistant City Attorney
Commissioner Michael Quinn Dana Alvidrez, City Transportation Engineer
Commissioner Jeff Velasquez Julie San Miguel, Clerk

Pledge of Allegiance

The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Koshiol.

Scheduled and Unscheduled Public Appearances

Members of the audience may address any item not on the agenda. State Statute prohibits the
Board or Commission from discussing an item that is not on the agenda, but the Board or
Commission does listen to your concerns and has staff follow up on any questions you raise.

CHAIRMAN HEUMAN explained for the Action Agenda, Staff and the Applicant will present, then
there will be an opportunity for members of the audience to speak. He further explained,
individual audience members will have three minutes to speak and after the Applicant will have
the floor again and Staff will be available if needed for questions.

Consent Agenda and Discussion
1. February 16, 2022, Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes

Move Planning and Zoning Commission approve Planning and Zoning Commission meeting
minutes of the Work Session of February 16, 2022.

2. March 2, 2022, Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes

Move Planning and Zoning Commission approve Planning and Zoning Commission meeting
minutes of the Study Session of March 2, 2022, and Regular Meeting of March 2, 2022.

3. PLH21-0080 MARTINEZ RESIDENCE

Request for Use Permit approval to allow for a single-family residence on a property zoned
Medium Density Residential District (MF-1). The site is located at 589 N. Delaware Street,
generally located % mile east of the southeast corner of Arizona Avenue & Galveston Street.

Move Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of Use Permit PLH21-0080 Martinez
Residence, subject to the conditions as recommended by Planning Staff.

Planning staff recommends Planning and Zoning Commission move to recommend approval of
the Use Permit, subject to the following conditions:

1. Substantial expansion or modification beyond the approved exhibits (Narrative, Site Pan, Floor
Plan and Elevations), as kept on file in Case No. PLH21-0080, shall void the Use Permit and require

new Use Permit application and approval, unless otherwise amended via conditions herein.

2. Use Permit approval does not constitute Final Development Plan approval; compliance with the
details required by all applicable codes and conditions of the City of Chandler and this Use Permit

shall apply.

3. The site shall be maintained in a clean and orderly manner.

4. The Use Permit is non-transferable to other locations.

4. Cancellation of the April 6, 2022, Planning and Zoning Commission Hearing

Move Planning and Zoning Commission cancel April 6, 2022, Planning and Zoning Commission
Hearing.

Page 2 of 13

Consent Agenda Motion and Vote

VICE CHAIRMAN ROSE moved to approve the Consent Agenda of the March 16, 2022, Regular
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting; Seconded by COMMISSIONER QUINN.

Motion carried unanimously (6-0).

Action Agenda Item No. 5 and Discussion
5. PLH21-0077/PLT21-0048 HAZELWOOD BY KEYSTONE HOMES

LAUREN SCHUMANN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER presented details regarding the request rezoning
from Agricultural (AG-1) district to Planned Area Development (PAD) for single-family residential,
Preliminary Development Plan approval for subdivision layout and housing product, and
Preliminary Plat approval for a 22-lot subdivision on approximately 8.7 acres located at the
southeast corner of Chandler Heights Road and 124th Street, approximately % mile east of
McQueen Road.

An Addendum Memo was presented to the Commission with a revised Preliminary Plat and
additional letters of concern received by Staff after posting of the memo.

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN advised that he would like the hear from the City's Traffic Engineer and
asked if the use of 124" Street is within the purview of the Planning and Zoning Commission.

LAUREN SCHUMANN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER stated per the Traffic Engineer the twenty-two lots
would create minimal trips down 124" Street and there is no issue.

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN would like the Traffic Engineer to speak as there are several letters stating
concerns with 124" Street. He asked staff to present a map and stated one of the concerns is for
the proposal to have access on Chandler Heights rather than 124" Street. He asked the Traffic
Engineer why Chandler Heights cannot be used for access.

DANA ALVIDREZ, CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER stated on the first iteration the proposal had
access; however, staff had access moved to 124" Street due to safety concerns. She explained the
City tries to minimize driveways directly on arterial streets especially in this area as it has a
frontage along 124" Street and a traffic signal. She stated this is the perfect location to utilize the
street to funnel traffic out onto the arterial street and the traffic light allows for safer turning
movements and dedicated turning movements.

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN asked if having Chandler Heights Road access would create a danger to
students at the school across the street.

Page 3 of 13

DANA ALVIDREZ, CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER stated it would be a challenge with the school
and school buses if there was access on Chandler Heights Road. She further stated the alternative
is a combination of safety for the school, students, and residents of Hazelwood.

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN confirmed no other Commission Members had questions for the City
Transportation Engineer and thanked her for being present for questions.

COMMISSIONER MORGAN asked if staff knew the reason City Council put off the 124‘ Street
improvements.

LAUREN SCHUMANN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER stated the subdivision was not accessing 124th
Street as the east side of the street was not within the City boundary. She explained the City would
require a full two drive lanes to be improved, so they would have to offset it onto Treeland
property and create more of a burden on that subdivision. She further explained the subdivision
decided to access 122nd Street because there was already a subdivision at the intersection, and
they improved their side. She stated Council made their decision because of the number of
concerns from the residents to the south and because the City did not have full right away of
124th Street at the time. She further stated the City would have to offset it and if the side did come
in, it would create a skewed road.

BRENNAN RAY, 1850 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE began the presentation by stating Keystone
Homes is a Phoenix based family-owned business that has been making high quality
developments throughout the Valley for thirty years. He further stated in Chandler they are
responsible for the high-quality communities of Canopy Lane, Madison Park, and Arizona Country.
He explained they are a top business with high quality in terms of thoughtfulness and design. He
presented statements regarding prior discussions with the neighbors and his appreciation for
their willingness to talk and allow him to visit. He explained the project is consistent with the
General Plan and the subdivision will consist of twenty-two single story homes. He mentioned the
Applicant agrees with everything staff presented and contained in their memo; therefore he would
keep his presentation short and would like the opportunity for rebuttal.

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN thanked the Applicant and mentioned he was given speaker cards. He
explained the speakers will be given three minutes to speak and they will need to start by stating
their name and address for the record.

KEN MCALISTER, 24206 SOUTH 124™ STREET asked the Chairman if he could be given six and a
half minutes.

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN announced Ken McAlister will have six minutes.

KEN MCALISTER, 24206 SOUTH 124™ STREET thanked the Commission and explained when this
project was first submitted to Staff the design had ingress egress on Chandler Heights, with the

Page 4 of 13

school bus stop drop off and pickup location. He warned once Chandler Heights is improved it will
generate more traffic with fast drivers and stated there are several buses that crossover the single
lane to enter and exit the school. He stated when Chandler Heights is widened the school busses
will cross two or three lines and increase the probability of an accident. He further stated, if there
was a single intersection with a dedicated light for a left turn into the school and exiting the school,
this would increase the safety of the children. He explained it is not true that putting a traffic signal
for ingress egress from Hazelwood would decrease safety, that a signal at Hazelwood is not far
enough from another traffic signal, and there is not a requirement for a deceleration lane because
of the number of homes. He presented examples of the number of traffic lights on Gilbert Road
and the Ryan Project that now houses the Amazon Distribution Center. He mentioned, Staff stated
it would not be an Amazon Distribution Center and now it is, he also said, Staff stated traffic
calculations did not warrant a control signal at that location and there is one there now. He stated
the public requested a north entrance to the facility and the south entrance be removed and Staff
stated that would not be approved, but there is one there now with ingress and egress for
Amazon. He stated if Staff was wrong about the Ryan Project, they can be wrong about this one.
He asked the Commission to think about all the schools in Chandler and asked if there are any on
arterial streets with busses that cross traffic without a traffic signal to enter and exit the school
safely. He stated there are none, so please do not let this start now. He further stated there were
eighteen residents at the Neighborhood Meeting to oppose the ingress egress on 124" Street and
wanted it moved to Chandler Heights, which is in opposition to the housing project, so Staff cannot
say they have received no opposition to the housing project. He explained having an ingress
egress on 124" Street would cause an undue burden on the residents of the area and the county
does not maintain these roads and it must be done as a community. He further explained a year
ago thirty-five truckloads of milled asphalt were purchased for the road. He stated the cost was
$300 from each homeowner to have this done in front of their homes and it already needs to be
done again. He explained a traffic signal on 124" Street will guide more traffic down the dirt road
and random people will turn on it thinking it is a through street to find out it dumps onto a dirt
road. He further explained, we continue to get fast drivers cutting through and Kevin Mayo,
Planning Administrator, knows this to be true as a fast driver cut past him on the dirt road while
he was driving to the Treeland Project. He stated the developer has not complied with number
eight of the Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) which is to have an agreement with the property
served by the ditch. He further stated the developer talked to one owner and there are five other
owners that have not had discussions regarding the ditch. He pointed out the improvements to
124" Street was deferred because of the issue with the irrigation ditch and the developer has not
gotten permission to do anything with the ditch which is a recorded easement. He explained the
City stated they are not involved and have no say, yet the developer says they have no say and
they are directed by the City. He further explained there is no resolution to what is going to happen
to the ditch. He stated the Commission cannot approve this PDP in good faith with ingress egress
onto 124" Street without permission to move the ditch and urges the Planning and Zoning
Commission to vote no on the Preliminary Development Plan and the Preliminary Plat.

Page 5 of 13

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN confirmed there were no questions for Ken McAlister and asked the
Assistant City Attorney to explain the issue of the easement and clarify if this is an issue between
the developer and the residents.

THOMAS ALLEN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY stated the resident has brought up several concerns,
some regarding traffic engineering decisions and the issue of the irrigation ditch. He explained
this is mostly controlled by state law, statutory and/or case law, but this City has design standards
that require ditches be moved out of the right of way and the City can require that movement to
take place. He further explained it is up to property owners to continue to serve
downfield/downstream properties, so to the extent the developer is making changes for City
requirements, they cannot do anything that would prevent downstream users from getting their
water as long as that is maintained. He stated it is not something the City regulates, so it is between
private property owners and they would have to continue to maintain the ditch to the standards
before it was moved.

COMMISSIONER VELASQUEZ mentioned he did not see the initial proposal and asked if it
stipulated a traffic signal light at the bus alignment and if it was right in and right out.

DANA ALVIDREZ, CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER stated the initial proposal did not have a
traffic light with the original driveway. She explained, the only way the City would entertain
something else, is it if aligned and original one did not align with the bus entrance. She stated in
this situation, it is something we do not recommend due to the school and they have access to a
collector street.

COMMISSIONER KOSHIOL mentioned there will be a median in the roadway per the new capital
improvement project along Chandler Heights Road. She asked if the future median would prohibit
school buses from taking a left turn southbound or able to make a left turn going east. She asked
if the buses would be able to make a left turn in and out.

DANA ALVIDREZ, CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER Stated there would be an immediate opening
at the location for the buses to be able to make movement.

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN called up the next speaker, Teresa Martinez Stoll.

TERESA MARTINEZ STOLL, 23815 SOUTH 124"4 STREET stated she is speaking on behalf of herself
and husband as their properties are the most effected and they oppose the ingress egress on
124th Street. She asked the City to review the case again and requested the entrance be on
Chandler Heights Road. She explained she has lived at the location for many years and recently
there have been parked cars and semitrucks on 124" Street. She stated there were City vehicles
parked out on her personal property to work on Treeland. She further stated drivers will go 150
miles per hour and nearly miss pedestrians by inches because they are flying up and down 424th
Street. She mentioned children ride their bikes down 124" Street and its not safe. She explained

Page 6 of 13

most of their concerns are regarding 124" Street and the development of the road. She stated the
City had a Preliminary Development Plant (PDP) for what they wanted to do with the traffic on
124" Street, but she was unable to view it because her father just passed away when it was given
to her. She asked to delay the project so she may review the plan, as they own the property where
they want to divert the road onto her utility easement for power poles. She asked if anybody has
gotten approval regarding the ditch on the west side along Treeland as there was discussion of
relocating and removing an electrical pole. She stated no one has spoken to her about the
electrical pole or coming on to her property, which is on a county island. She stated the street is
considered a dead end and City is going to relocate the sign. She further stated the Applicant is
requesting to replace her piping fence with a solid one, which will block her view, she stated the
fence needs to be brought up with all the homeowners and the issue with the ditch should also
be brought up with all the homeowners. She asked if anyone spoke to the homeowners regarding
the ditch and stressed the area is a county island. She suggested “Ranch A” homes do not get built
on lots #1 - #8, as the elevations would look over her backyard. She presented concerns regarding
the distance from the homes to the back fence line. She stated there are a lot of issues that have
not been reviewed, discussed, or agreed on and she believes there needs to be better
communication with the City and the Applicant. She pointed out she has only spoke to Brendan
once in her home, although he said they have had several communications.

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN asked Teresa Martinez Stoll to finish as she has gone over the allowed time.

TERESA MARTINEZ STOLL, 23815 SOUTH 124TH STREET stated she is a fifth generation Chandler
native and her husband is a fourth generation. She explained they have seen a lot of development
and growth in Chandler and asked to stop, listen, do not laugh, and show us respect. She asked
the Commission to show the rest of the community that we are a City to be proud of and prove to
the community that at Chandler we work together. She asked the Commission to delay approval
until more communication can be had.

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN thanked the speaker and confirmed there were no questions. He
mentioned no one was laughing and stated earlier he was making a comment regarding the timer.

THOMAS ALLEN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY stated the bulk of the concerns tonight are related to
traffic and those decisions by our traffic engineer to require the entrance be on 124th Street. He
further stated. this is a public forum and those are valid concerns, and it is okay to express. He
reminded the purview of the Commission is a recommending body to City Council, in specific
regard to the rezoning application, the PDP for housing product and subdivision layout and the
preliminary plat. He pointed out it is not really within the Commission's purview to make decisions
or recommendations about the decisions of the traffic engineer.

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN thanked the Assistant City Attorney for the reminder and asked the next
speaker, Brad Peterson, to limit his time to three minutes.

Page 7 of 13

BRAD PETERSON, 24607 SOUTH 123RD STREET stated he has been a resident for 12 years and
they moved to this location because it was quiet. He further stated he would like to echo all of Mr.
McAllister comments. He explained the residents in this area maintain the streets and gave an
example of a gentleman maintains the road with his tractor and will not take money for gas. He
stated if the entrance is on 124th Street it is going to draw more cars and traffic down that that
road. He further explained Riggs Road is to the south, so 124th Street will be a direct route from
the school to Riggs Road. He presented concerns as a portion of the road is one lane and if you
are in a truck, you have to stop and let the others come through. He is opposed to 2 % homes per
acre as the existing homes are acre properties and the proposed is not a good fit in the
community. He mentioned if Treeland can have access from Chandler Heights, there is no reason
why they cannot do the same thing for this project.

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN thanked the speaker and confirmed there were no questions. He called up
the next speaker Dave Shapiro and asked him to begin with his name and address for the record.

DAVE SHAPIRO, 12515 EAST CHANDLER HEIGHTS ROAD stated he bought property in 1980 and
built a house on it 37 years ago and since there was only alfalfa and corn at the time, he believes
the neighbors may have complained about him moving in. He further stated, unfortunately, this
community has grown from the 28,000 that it was when he moved here and started teaching at
Chandler High School. He explained his concerns are different from the people on 124th Street as
he is located directly to the east of the proposed site. He stated that he and his neighbor's
concerns are the irrigation ditch to the east. He further explained no one knows what they are
going do with it. He asked if it is covered, how does that get cleaned out and what prevents it from
overflowing and flooding into my neighborhood or into my yard. He asked if the seven-foot wall
was going to be built and stated that he agreed with the previous speakers regarding traffic with
the school buses. He suggested the school district move the bus pickup and drop off to the other
side behind where the neighborhood park would be.

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN thanked the speaker and confirmed there were no questions. He asked if
anyone else in the audience wanted to speak on this item and called up the Applicant for rebuttal.

BRENNAN RAY, 1850 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE thanked the Commission and stated there are
several things he will not comment on as they are specifically relative to traffic. He further stated
the Traffic Engineer has done her job and although one feels they know traffic, there are
professional industry training and standards one must achieve to be a Traffic Engineer. He
respected the comments of the Assistant City Attorney as to irrigation and the Applicant knows
their obligation for existing waterways and the Applicant will be responsible ensuring the ditch is
maintained and the water continues to flow as it does today. He explained he knows that is not
within the purview of the Commission, but he wanted to confirm maintenance obligations will be
on Keystone homes and the future HOA. He further explained the Applicant has an obligation to
make sure they not dump extra water or anything onto Mr. Shapiro’s property as well. He
presented statements regarding the civil improvement process and the request before the

Page 8 of 13

Commission. He asked the Commission to recommend approval to the City Council, in accordance
to staff's recommendation.

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN mentioned the elevation with the gabled roof was brought up and asked
the Applicant to bring up the image.

BRENNAN RAY, 1850 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE presented an image as it had a summary of the
floor plans and pointed out the max height of the homes are 23 feet. He stated there are no
privacy concerns as the homes are single story and there is separation and distance from the

existing homes.

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN pointed out the “Ranch A” Elevation and asked if it was the same height as
the other elevations.

BRENNAN RAY, 1850 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE replied yes, and there are no front elevations that
will face to the south side.

LAUREN SCHUMANN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER stated before the Commission is an Addendum
Memo with a Revised Preliminary Plat as a track was missing along the east side calling out the
future irrigation ditch. She explained Staff worked with the engineering team to make it and it will
be finalized through a final plat and through a.separate instrument. She further stated also
attached to the Addendum Memo are additional letters of concern received after posting of the

agenda.

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN asked staff when this item will go before the City Council.

LAUREN SCHUMANN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER replied this is scheduled to be on the April 14, 2022
City Council Meeting Agenda.

Action Agenda Item No. 5 Motion and Vote

COMMISSIONER MORGAN moved to approve Action Agenda Item No. 5 of the March 16, 2022,
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, with revised Preliminary Plat; Seconded by VICE
CHAIRMAN ROSE.

Motion carried unanimously (6-0).

Rezoning
Move Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of Rezoning PLH21-0077
Hazelwood By Keystone Homes, Rezoning from AG-1 to PAD for a single-family residential, subject

to the conditions as recommended by Planning staff.

Page 9 of 13

Preliminary Development Plan

Move Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of Preliminary Development
Plan PLH21-0077 Hazelwood By Keystone Homes for subdivision layout and housing product,
subject to the conditions as recommended by Planning staff.

Preliminary Plat
Move Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of Preliminary Plat, PLT21-0048
Hazelwood By Keystone Homes, subject to the condition as recommended by Planning staff.

Rezoning
Planning staff recommends Planning and Zoning Commission move to recommend approval of
Rezoning from AG-1 to PAD for single-family residential, subject to the following conditions:

1. Development shall be in substantial conformance with the Development Booklet, entitled,
"Hazelwood by Keystone Homes" and kept on file in the City of Chandler Planning Division,
in File No. PLH21-0077, modified by such conditions included at the time the Booklet was
approved by the Chandler City Council and/or as thereafter amended, modified or
supplemented by Chandler City Council.

2. Prior to the time of making any lot reservations or subsequent sales agreements, the
homebuilder/lot developer shall provide a written disclosure statement, for the signature
of each buyer, acknowledging that the subdivision is located adjacent to or nearby existing
ranchette and animal privilege properties that may cause adverse noise, odors and other
externalities. The "Public Subdivision Report", "Purchase Contracts", CC&R's and the
individual lot property deeds shall include a disclosure statement outlining that the site is
adjacent to agricultural properties that have horse and animal privileges and shall state that
such uses are legal and should be expected to continue indefinitely. This responsibility for
notice rests with the homebuilder/lot developer, and shall not be construed as an absolute
guarantee by the City of Chandler for receiving such notice.

3. Completion of the construction of all required off-site street improvements including but
not limited to paving, landscaping, curb, gutter and sidewalks, median improvements and
street lighting to achieve conformance with City codes, standard details, and design
manuals.

4. The landscaping in all open-spaces shall be maintained by the property owner or property
owners’ association, and shall be maintained at a level consistent with or better than at the

time of planting.

5. The landscaping in all rights-of-way shall be maintained by the adjacent property owner or
property owners' association.

Page 10 of 13

6.

The developer shall be required to install landscaping in the arterial street median(s)
adjoining this project. In the event that the landscaping already exists within such median(s)
the developer shall be required to upgrade such landscaping to meet current City
Standards.

Right-of-way dedications to achieve full half-widths, including turn lanes and deceleration
lanes, per the standards of the Chandler Transportation Plan.

Minimum setbacks shall be as provided below and further detailed in the development
booklet:

20 ft. to forward facing garage door

15 ft. to livable area components of the home

Front 10 ft. to porch or side-entry garage

Yard (Architectural features and projections, such as pot
Shelves, ledges, pop outs or similar, may encroach into
front yard setback up to 18 inches

Side
Vards 5 ft. and 10 ft.
Rear 15 ft.

Yard |Accessory Structures minimum 5 ft.

Preliminary Development Plan
Planning staff recommends Planning and Zoning Commission move to recommend approval of
the Preliminary Development Plan, subject to the following conditions:

1.

Development shall be in substantial conformance with the Development Booklet, entitled
"Hazelwood by Keystone Homes" and kept on file in the City of Chandler Planning Division,
in File No. PLH21-0077, modified by such conditions included at the time the Booklet was
approved by the Chandler City Council and/or as thereafter amended, modified or
supplemented by the Chandler City Council.

All lots shall be constructed with single-story homes.

The same elevation shall not be built side-by-side or directly across the street from one
another.

The site shall be maintained in a clean and orderly manner.
Landscaping plans (including for open spaces, rights-of-way, and street medians) and

perimeter walls shall be approved by the Planning Administrator.

Page 11 of 13

6. The following enhanced landscape standards shall apply to the common open space and
retention area along Chandler Heights Road:

a. 50% of required trees shall have a minimum planting size of a 36-inch box and a
minimum of 12-feet in height at the time of planting.

b. A minimum of one (1) tree and six (6) shrubs per twenty-five (25) lineal feet of frontage
on arterial or collector street rights-of-way.

7. The covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC & R's) to be filed and recorded with the
subdivision shall mandate the installation of front yard landscaping within 180 days from
the date of occupancy with the homeowners' association responsible for monitoring and
enforcement of this requirement.

8. The existing irrigation ditch located on the Property shall either be undergrounded in
compliance with City Code Section 48-12.12 with the agreement of the properties served by
the ditch, or left in place and a view fence constructed along the border of the irrigation
ditch easement that faces the development. Any alterations to the ditch should be designed
and/or approved by a registered civil engineer. The decision of whether to underground
the irrigation ditch is purely a private property matter, and the City shall have no role in
deciding whether the irrigation ditch will be altered or how it will be maintained in the
future.

9. Sign packages, including free-standing signs as well as wall-mounted signs, shall be
designed in coordination with landscape plans, planting materials, storm water retention
requirements, and utility pedestals, so as not to create problems with sign visibility or
prompt the removal of required landscape materials.

10.Each garage shall be pre-wired to provide 240V electrical capacity necessary to
accommodate future electric vehicle charging equipment.

11.Preliminary Development Plan approval does not constitute Final Development Plan
approval; compliance with the details required by all applicable codes and conditions of the
City of Chandler and this Preliminary Development Plan shall apply.

Preliminary Plat
Planning staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission move to recommend approval

of the Preliminary Plat subject to the following condition:

1. Approval by the City Engineer and Planning Administrator with regard to the details of all
submittals required by code or condition.

Page 12 of 13

Member Comments/Announcements

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN advised the audience that the Planning and Zoning Commission is a
recommending body to the City Council and this item will be on the City Council agenda for April
14, 2022, where the residents will have the opportunity to speak to Council.

Calendar
The next regular meeting will be held on Wednesday, April 20, 2022, in the Chandler City Council

Chambers, 88 E. Chicago Street.

Adjourn

The meeting was adjourned at 6:21 p.m.

1k.

Kevin Mayo, Secretary Rick Heumann, Chairman

Page 13 of 13