MAG Agreement for Protected Bike Lanes Study

MAG Agreement No. 1137A-0C Task Order 11 
1 
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT AGREEMENT BETWEEN 
MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS 
AND THE CITY OF CHANDLER FOR THE 
CHANDLER BIKE LANES FEASIBILITY STUDY 
This agreement (“Agreement”) is between the Maricopa Association of Governments (“MAG”), an Arizona 
non-profit corporation, and the City of Chandler, an Arizona municipal corporation (“CITY”), collectively 
referred to as the “Parties,” or individually as a “Party.”  
This Agreement shall become effective as of the last date of execution below and shall continue in full force 
and effect until May 30, 2023 or the completion of the PROJECT (defined below), whichever comes later.  
MAG and CITY view this Agreement as a mutually beneficial relationship. 
A) Statutory Authorization Agreement
The Parties are authorized to enter into this Agreement by Arizona Revised Statutes §§ 28-6308 and 28-
6353.  
B) Purpose of the Agreement
The purpose of this Agreement is to identify and define the level of financial participation by CITY and MAG 
to prepare the Chandler Protected Bike Lanes Feasibility Study (“PROJECT”).  
The PROJECT will be completed through a MAG On-Call Contract using a consultant(s) from the approved 
Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Design Assistance Program and Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plans and 
First Time Updates On-Call Consultant list. The cost of this PROJECT will not exceed $79,999.  
C) Mission/Goal Statement
The goal of the PROJECT is to provide Project Assessment for the Chandler Protected Bike Lanes 
Feasibility Study for the CITY. 
D) Study Funding
1.
MAG is the recipient of Surface Transportation Block Grant Program Funds as described in the
amendments and modifications to the Fiscal Year 2022-2025 Transportation Improvements Plan (TIP).
2.
The consultant contract for the PROJECT will be for an amount not to exceed $79,999.01 Subject to
the availability of funding and approval of their respective governing bodies, funding for the PROJECT
will be shared among the Parties as follows:
The original amount allocated to the CITY for the PROJECT is $79,999.01. Subject to the availability
of funding and approval of their respective governing bodies, funding for the PROJECT will be shared
among the Parties as follows.
Maricopa Association of Governments 
$  75,439 
94.3% 
CITY/TOWN match 
$    4,560 
  5.7% 
Total / Subtotal 
$  79,999 
100% 
3.
Cost adjustments:  The MAG/CITY proportional share for the awarded funds is to be split 94.3/5.7 for
any amount less than or equal to original allocated amount of $79,999.01. If at any time during the
Project MAG anticipates that there will be cost overruns, MAG will immediately notify CITY and
schedule a meeting to discuss the status of the Project. If the cost for the consultant is more than the
original allocated amount (including proportional share), it will be the CITY’s responsibility to cover
excess costs.

MAG Agreement No. 1137A-0C Task Order 11 
 
2 
 
 
4. 
CITY financial participation is limited to paying CITY’S share including addition CITY local funds as 
provided in paragraphs 3 above.  It shall be MAG’s responsibility to enter into the consultant contract.  
 
5. 
MAG will invoice CITY for CITY’S share within thirty (30) calendar days of execution of this Agreement. 
CITY shall make payment to MAG within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of invoice.  The financial 
contribution of both Parties shall be deposited into the specified account no later than sixty (60) 
calendar days after payment of invoice. MAG shall maintain billing accounts and financial records 
during and for three (3) years after the completion of this Agreement and will produce the same to 
CITY upon CITY’S written request. 
 
6. 
All notices or demands required to be given pursuant to the terms of this Agreement shall be given to 
the other Party in writing, delivered in person, sent by confirmed email, deposited in the United States 
mail, postage prepaid, registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, or deposited with any 
commercial air courier or express service at the addresses set forth below, or to such address as the 
Parties may substitute by written notice given in the manner described in this paragraph. 
 
For MAG: 
 
Eric J. Anderson 
Executive Director 
Maricopa Association of Governments 
302 North First Avenue, Suite 300 
Phoenix, Arizona 85003 
602-254-6300 
 
For the CITY 
 
Jason Crampton, AICP 
Transportation Planning Manager 
P.O. Box 4008/ Mail Stop 412 
Chandler, AZ  85244 
480-782-3402 
 
Notices shall be deemed received on date delivered, if delivered by hand; on the day it is sent by 
confirmed email; on the second day after its deposit with any commercial air courier or express service; 
or, if mailed, ten (10) calendar days after the notice is deposited in the United States mail as above 
provided; and on the delivery date indicated on receipt if delivered by certified or registered mail.  Any 
time period stated in a notice shall be computed from the time the notice is deemed received.  Notices 
sent by confirmed email shall also be sent by regular mail to the recipients at the above addresses. 
This requirement for duplication notice is not intended to change the effective date of the notice sent 
by confirmed email. 
 
7. 
In the event that the MAG funds required for performance of this Agreement are withdrawn or are not 
available for funding, this Agreement, without penalty to any of the Parties, may be immediately 
terminated; and any unspent financial contribution paid by CITY will be returned to CITY. 
 
8. 
After the PROJECT has been completed and the final retainage invoice has been paid to the 
consultant, the CITY will invoice MAG within 30 days for reimbursement of CITY’S SHARE that has 
not been spent (if any). 
 
E) General Terms and Conditions of the Agreement 
 
1. 
Governing Law.  This Agreement is entered into in Arizona and shall be construed and interpreted 
under the laws of the State of Arizona.

MAG Agreement No. 1137A-0C Task Order 11 
 
3 
 
2. 
Severability.  If any provision of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal or unenforceable, that 
provision shall be severed from the Agreement, and the remaining provisions shall otherwise remain 
in full force. 
 
3. 
Hold Harmless.  MAG and CITY (each as “Indemnitor”) agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless 
the other Party  (as “Indemnitee”) from and against any and all claims, losses, liability, costs, or 
expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees) (hereinafter collectively referred to 
as "Claims”) arising out of the bodily injury of any person (including death) or property damage and 
any other claims (including, but not limited to, claims of derivative or vicarious liability), which are 
caused by the act, omission, negligence, misconduct or other fault of the Indemnitor, its officers, 
officials, agents, employees or volunteers. 
 
4. 
This Agreement shall not be construed to imply authority to perform tasks, or accept any responsibility, 
not expressly set forth herein. 
 
5. 
This Agreement shall be strictly constructed against the creation of a duty or responsibility unless the 
intention to do so is clearly and unambiguously set forth herein. 
 
6. 
This Agreement shall be subject to cancellation for conflict of interest without penalty or further 
obligations as provided by A.R.S. § 38-511. 
 
7. 
This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding of the Parties and supersedes all previous 
representations, written or oral, with respect to the services specified herein.  This Agreement may not 
be modified or amended except by a written document, signed by authorized representatives of each 
Party. 
 
8. 
Each Party hereby warrants and represents that it has full power and authority to enter into and perform 
this Agreement, and that the person signing on behalf of each has been properly authorized and 
empowered to enter into this Agreement.  Each Party further acknowledges that it has read this 
Agreement, understands it, and agrees to be bound by it. 
 
9. 
 Each of the following shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement and an event of default 
("Default") hereunder: A Party's failure to observe or perform any of the material covenants, conditions 
or provisions of this Agreement to be observed or performed by that Party ("Defaulting Party"), where 
such failure continues for a period of thirty (30) days after the Defaulting Party receives written notice 
of such failure from the non-defaulting party, provided however that such failure shall not be a Default 
if the Defaulting Party has commenced to cure the Default within such thirty (30) day period and 
thereafter is diligently pursuing such cure to completion, but the total aggregate cure period shall not 
exceed ninety (90) days unless the Parties agree in writing that additional time is reasonably necessary 
under the circumstances to cure the default. In the event a Defaulting Party fails to perform any of its 
material obligations under this Agreement and is in Default, the non-defaulting party, at its option, may 
terminate this Agreement. Further, upon the occurrence of any Default and at any time thereafter, the 
non-defaulting party may, but shall not be required to, exercise any remedies now or hereafter 
available to it at law or in equity. 
 
10. This Agreement is subject to all applicable provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act (Public 
Law 101-336, 42 U.S.C. 12101-12213) and all applicable Federal regulations under the Act, including 
28 CFR Parts 35 and 36. The Parties to this Agreement shall comply with Executive Order Number 
2009-09 issued by the Governor of the State of Arizona and incorporated by reference regarding “Non-
Discrimination.” 
 
11. Non-Availability of Funds: Every obligation of the Parties under this Agreement is conditioned upon 
the availability of funds appropriated or allocated for the fulfillment of such obligations. If funds are not 
allocated and available for the continuance of this Agreement, this Agreement may be terminated by 
the Parties at the end of the period for which the funds are available. No liability shall accrue to the

MAG Agreement No. 1137A-0C Task Order 11 
 
4 
 
Parties in the event this provision is exercised, and the Parties shall not be obligated or liable for any 
future payments as a result of termination under this paragraph. 
 
12. In the event of any controversy, which may arise out of this Agreement, the Parties agree to abide by 
arbitration as is set forth for public works contracts if required by A.R.S. § 12-1518. 
 
13. The Parties shall comply with the applicable requirements of A.R.S. § 41-4401. 
 
14. The Parties shall comply with all applicable laws, rules, regulations and ordinances, as may be 
amended. 
 
15. In accordance with Arizona law, attached is the written determination of each Party's legal counsel 
that the Parties are authorized under the laws of this State to enter into this Agreement and that the 
Agreement is in proper form. 
 
 
 
(Signature page follows)

MAG Agreement No. 1137A-0C Task Order 11 
5 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement. 
CITY, an Arizona municipal corporation 
By: 
Kevin Hartke 
Mayor 
City of Chandler 
Date: 
Attest: 
By: 
Dana DeLong 
City Clerk 
City of Chandler 
Maricopa Association of Governments, an Arizona non-profit corporation 
By: 
Eric J. Anderson 
Executive Director 
Date: 
Reviewed as to form by General Counsel for Maricopa Association of Governments, and Counsel 
for the CITY 
I have reviewed the above referenced Agreement between MAG and the CITY, an agreement proper in 
form and within the powers and authority granted to the CITY under the laws of the State of Arizona. 
No opinion is expressed as to the authority of MAG to enter into this Agreement. 
Kelly Schwab 
 
Kathryn Gasior 
CITY Attorney  
    Maricopa Association of Governments 
City of Chandler 
General Counsel

MAG Agreement No. 1137A-0C Task Order 11 
6 
APPENDIX A - SCOPE OF SERVICES 
MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (“MAG”) 
TASK ORDER NO. 11 
ON CALL CONTRACT NO. 1137A-0C, Y2K ENGINEERING, LLC 
PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES DESIGN ASSISTANCE PROGRAM AND MAG BICYCLE 
AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLANS AND FIRST TIME UPDATES ON-CALL 
PROTECTED BIKE LANE FEASIBILITY STUDY 
MAG PROJECT NO. 0600-0145-22-E001-1137A-0C.000011 
TASK ORDER SUMMARY 
The purpose of this Section is to outline the major tasks required to be performed to produce the needed 
analyses and deliverables to MAG.   
This project will provide a Protected Bike Lane Feasibility Report for the City of Chandler. While the City of 
Chandler Transportation Master Plan identified four protected bike lane corridors, the City - with feedback 
received from residents - wants to increase the number of protected bike lanes in other parts of the city as 
well. This report will include protected bike lane design criteria, determine the feasibility of converting 
existing and planned bike lanes to protected bike lanes in the City of Chandler, and develop a prioritized 
list of locations for implementation.  
This project will analyze both existing and planned bike lanes on arterial and collector streets and determine 
which bike lanes could be converted to protected lanes without removing a vehicle lane or widening the 
roadway. To do this exercise, the City will determine design criteria for protected bike lanes that outlines 
the needed space on a roadway and elements to include to for a protected bike facility. Once the corridors 
are identified for protected bike lanes, the corridors will be prioritized for implementation based on a set of 
factors that could include street paving coordination, land use, destination/activity centers, demographics, 
proximity to transit, connected bicycle facilities, bicycle and pedestrian use data, safety/crash analysis, 
public feedback, and other metrics and/ or qualitative considerations.  
Finally, the study will provide high-level cost estimates, per mile, for different design types of protected bike 
lane facilities (width and vertical elements). This effort will also identify City of Chandler processes for 
funding cycles, pavement maintenance efforts, and implementation/constructions options.   
The Scope of Services described below shall not be modified except at MAG’s request or with MAG’s 
concurrence. Any services rendered by Y2K Engineering, LLC (“CONSULTANT”) that MAG considers to 
be outside the Scope of Services of this Task Order shall not be the responsibility of MAG. 
TOTAL TASK ORDER BUDGET 
The CONSULTANT budget is attached.  The total amount of this Task Order shall not exceed $79,999.01  
TASK 1. MEETINGS AND PUBLIC OUTREACH 
The CONSULTANT will coordinate the Project Kickoff Meeting, held virtually with City staff, the 
CONSULTANT, and MAG Project Manager attending. This meeting will be scheduled within three 
(3) weeks of the Notice to Proceed.  Project related issues will be identified and discussed at this
meeting to use as a basis for development of the report. Kickoff Meeting notes will be prepared by
the CONSULTANT and copies provided to City staff and the MAG Project Manager.
The CONSULTANT will coordinate and attend monthly project coordination meetings (up to eight 
total) with the City Project Manager and MAG Project Manager. These will be held virtually.

MAG Agreement No. 1137A-0C Task Order 11 
 
7 
 
 
The CONSULTANT shall develop content for a project webpage hosted on the City of Chandler’s 
website. The content will include a project description, project schedule, and other information and 
documents from the project as mutually agreed upon by the CONSULTANT and CITY.  
 
The CONSULTANT will host one public meeting, in person or virtually. Depending on the format, it 
could include a slide presentation, public meeting boards, a mapping exercise, and question and 
answer session. The public meeting will be supplemented with an electronic survey.  The public 
meeting will introduce the project to the community, share protected bike lane design options, and 
seek input from the community on their bicycling priorities.  At the end of the project, website content 
will be updated with information summarizing the findings and implementation steps.   
 
The CONSULTANT shall provide project information and graphics, when available, to the City for 
use at other meetings.  
 
The CONSULTANT will provide MAG with monthly progress reports summarizing the status of the 
project and work completed during the reporting period. Any issues that are adversely affecting the 
timely completion of the project and that need to be resolved shall be identified as soon as possible 
and shall also be identified in the progress reports. Monthly progress reports shall be attached to 
the monthly invoices. 
 
The CONSULTANT will conduct the following meetings and public outreach for the study: 
 
• 
Kick off meeting 
• 
8 monthly virtual coordination meetings 
• 
1 public meeting (in person or virtual) 
• 
1 electronic survey 
 
Deliverables 
 
1. 
Summary Memorandum: Meeting minutes, and public involvement materials and 
summary.   
 
 
TASK 2. PROTECTED BIKE LANE DESIGN GUIDELINES 
 
A critical step of determining the feasibility of installing protected bike lanes in the City of Chandler, 
is developing a set of agreed upon design options for protected bike lanes.  This will establish the 
needed width and space within a roadway to install a protected bike lane.   
 
The CONSULTANT will develop a protected bike lane design guidelines technical memorandum 
that will evaluate and determine various components of a protected bike lane that can include 
minimum and maximum widths for one-way protected bike lane dimensions, buffer dimensions, 
total facility dimensions; acknowledgement of gutter pan; physical barrier options; barrier 
placement; bicycle lane symbol markings; and intersection treatment options.  Design resources 
for two-lane protected bike lanes and side-paths will be referenced but not developed in detail. 
Supporting the design guidelines will be protected bike lane design criteria that will provide context 
on the best protected bike lane application based on speed and volumes, and other factors such 
as driveway density.  The goal of this effort is to determine the needed total width of installing a 
protected bike lane and what type of protection aligns with the vehicle roadway conditions.  
 
The CONSULTANT will use the Frye Road Protected Bikeway Project – Lane Width Memorandum, 
FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide, FHWA Separated Bike Lane Planning and Design Guide, the 
MAG Active Transportation Plan, and related documents supplied by City of Chandler. 
 
Deliverables

MAG Agreement No. 1137A-0C Task Order 11 
8 
1.
Protected Bike Lane Design Guidelines Memorandum: a technical memorandum with 2-D
cross section and plan view figures.
TASK 3. DATA COLLECTION & ANALYSIS 
The CONSULTANT will do a Three-Step data collection and analysis process.  The first step is 
reviewing existing and planned bike lanes to determine if there is enough width to convert/add 
protection to the bike lane, without removing a vehicle lane or widening the roadway.  If it is 
determined that the corridor does not have enough room to add/convert the bike lane, the corridor 
does not move forward to the next step. The list of proposed data needs and analysis is listed below 
and can be modified accordingly based on data availability. 
Step 1: Screening (proposed factors) 
•
Corridor identification and mileage
•
Part of existing bikeway network or fills a gap
•
Street Classification
•
Curb to curb width
•
Number of vehicle/parking lanes
•
Width of each vehicle/parking in each direction
•
Width of existing bike lane (if applicable)
•
Median Width (if applicable)
•
Speed posted on roadway
•
Vehicle and speed counts (provided by the City)
•
Signalized and Unsignalized intersections
The second step is the feasibility analysis, which will evaluate additional factors that could positively 
or negatively affect the protected bike lane application.  The proposed factor evaluation is noted 
below and can be modified accordingly based on data availability.  In this analysis, the data for 
each factor will be evaluated and categorized into supportive, neutral, or non-supportive for 
protected bike lanes.  For example, if the number of driveways, driveway spacing, and intersections 
along a corridor is high, this will be categorized as non-supportive; if the safety concern is high for 
the corridor, it will be categorized as supportive.  The CONSULTANT team will work with the City 
of Chandler to determine the scoring process for the factor analysis.   
Step 2: Feasibility of Protected Bike Lane (proposed factors) 
•
Speed (posted and measured) – provided by the City
•
Average daily traffic (ADT) – provided by the City
•
Connected bike facilities (network perspective)
•
Number of driveway spacing/ intersections in a mile
•
Underground utility consideration/coordination
•
Transit stops
•
Bicycle crashes in a five-year period
•
Adjacent land use
The third step will be aligning the corridors from the previous step with the protected bike lane 
design options. This will include a comprehensive bicycle network review of proposed facility design 
options. 
The result of this Task 3 will be a list and a map that includes graphics of corridors with protected 
bike lane design options that are most feasible for adding protected bike lanes or upgrading existing 
bike lanes with protection, without extensive curb reconstruction.

MAG Agreement No. 1137A-0C Task Order 11 
 
9 
 
The CONSULTANT and City staff will work together to identify existing data sources to use, and 
for needed data, what source to use. 
 
Deliverables 
 
 1. Technical Memorandum: A Technical memorandum that includes corridor protected bike lane 
feasibility evaluation and outcomes and a three-step evaluation process excel template.  
 
TASK 4. PROTECTED BIKE LANE FEASIBILITY REPORT 
 
Building from the information gathered and analyzed in Task 3, the CONSULTANT will work with 
the City of Chandler to understand their existing processes and cycles for Capital Improvements 
Plan (CIP) funding, planned projects on the proposed protected bike lane corridors, pavement 
maintenance program, and other programs as provided by City of Chandler.  The CONSULTANT 
will identify existing opportunities to implement projects and propose alignment of resources and 
schedules.   
 
While leveraging existing City processes, the CONSULTANT will complete a corridor prioritization 
process that could include various land use and demographic information, proximity to transit, 
bicycle activity (e.g., Strava, bike to bus, bicycle counts, etc.), bicycle and pedestrian safety metrics, 
public feedback, and other metrics and/ or qualitative considerations. 
 
Using the information from previous tasks, the CONSULTANT will develop planning-level cost 
estimates (per mile, per unsignalized intersection, per signalized intersection) of the different design 
options (up to 4 vertical design elements) and apply these estimates to the top ranked corridors. 
 
The CONSULTANT will develop a draft and final City of Chandler - Protected Bike Lane Feasibility 
Report that includes information from project tasks, including maps and figures. 
 
Deliverables 
 
1. 
City of Chandler - Protected Bike Lane Feasibility Report: a report that includes information 
from previous technical memorandums, maps, and the prioritization process development, 
analysis, and outcomes; cost estimates; and implementation options. A Prioritization 
process excel template will be included. 
 
 
TASK 5. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE REPORT 
 
CONSULTANT will prepare an executive summary of the project. The summary shall include an 
aerial map of the area and a brief description of the pedestrian/bicycle design assistance project 
and key recommendations. A primary goal of the summary shall be to provide an explanation of 
the regional significance of the project and lessons learned from this project that could be applied 
to the other areas of the region to help improve the pedestrian/bicycle environment. The summary 
will include text to describe the short term and long-term pedestrian improvement and bicycle facility 
design impacts to the City of Chandler and how this project fits with their current citywide 
transportation masterplan and regional active transportation plan. The summary shall be reviewed 
by the MAG Program Manager and comments shall be incorporated into the draft summary to 
create a final version. 
 
 
Deliverables 
 
1. 
Executive Summary Report: Prepare and deliver to City of Chandler and MAG an executive 
summary and regional significance report.

MAG Agreement No. 1137A-0C Task Order 11 
10 
I.
TASK ORDER SCHEDULE
It is anticipated that the project will commence on or about October 15, 2022 and will be completed
by May 30, 2023.
II.
TASK ORDER PROJECT TEAM
The CONSULTANT will form a work team of key personnel (as named below) to perform the
project.  Other labor requirements will be filled by other staff members of the CONSULTANT.
Y2K Engineering, LLC
Yung Koprowski 
Principal 
Eileen Yazzie 
 
Transportation Planner III (Consultant Project Manager) 
Alan Berry 
Transportation Planner I

MAG Agreement No. 1137A-0C Task Order 11 
11 
PROJECT NAME:
Chandler Protected Bike Lane Feasibility Study
CONTRACT NUMBER:
1137A-0C
CONTRACT PERIOD:  FROM
7/18/2022
TO
4/30/2023
TASK ORDER NUMBER:
11
TASK ORDER PERIOD:  FROM
7/18/2022
TO
4/30/2023
MAG STAFF:
Kay Bork
CONSULTANT REMIT TO ADDRESS:
Y2K Engineering, LLC.
1921 S. Alma School Rd., Suite 204
Mesa, AZ 85210
TAXPAYER ID NUMBER:  
81-4986688
* Only type in the BLUE or GREEN areas and be sure to enter entire budget
PRIME CONSULTANT
Original Costs and Rates
Raw Direct 
Task 1
Task 2
Task 3
Task 4
Task 5
Direct 
Hourly Rate
Meetings & 
Public 
Outreach
Design 
Guidelines
Data Collection 
and Analysis
SBL Feasibility 
Study
Regional Sig. 
Report
Total Hours
Total Cost
Yung Koprowski
$84.00
18.00
16.00
8.00
8.00
0.00
50.00
$4,200.00
Eileen Yazzie
$64.50
39.00
40.00
28.00
60.00
8.00
175.00
$11,287.50
Alan Berry
$35.00
24.00
48.00
28.00
40.00
8.00
148.00
$5,180.00
Denise Baker
$41.00
0.00
0.00
4.00
8.00
0.00
12.00
$492.00
Samantha Cole
$35.00
0.00
0.00
36.00
0.00
0.00
36.00
$1,260.00
Mark Ingersoll
$29.00
0.00
0.00
36.00
0.00
0.00
36.00
$1,044.00
Kurt Larson
$31.00
0.00
0.00
36.00
0.00
0.00
36.00
$1,116.00
Connor McAlinden
$45.00
0.00
24.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
24.00
$1,080.00
Total Task Hours
81.00
128.00
176.00
116.00
16.00
517.00
25,659.50
      
Total Task Cost
$4,867.50
$6,684.00
$7,042.00
$6,270.00
$796.00
$25,659.50
Overhead and/or Fringe Audited Rate 
1.79
$8,712.83
$11,964.36
$12,605.18
$11,223.30
$1,424.84
$45,930.51
Total Labor with Overhead
$13,580.33
$18,648.36
$19,647.18
$17,493.30
$2,220.84
$71,590.01
Fee (10% max rate)
0.10
$1,358.03
$1,864.84
$1,964.72
$1,749.33
$222.08
$7,159.00
14,938.36
$     
20,513.20
$     
21,611.90
$          
19,242.63
$       
2,442.92
$         
78,749.01
$    
PRIME CONSULTANT
Task 1
Task 2
Task 3
Task 4
Task 5
 Meetings & 
Public 
Outreach 
 Design 
Guidelines 
 Data Collection 
and Analysis 
 SBL Feasibility 
Study 
 Regional Sig. 
Report 
Total Cost
$50.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$50.00
$0.00
$600.00
$0.00
$600.00
$0.00
$1,200.00
50.00
$             
600.00
$           
-
$
 
600.00
$            
-
$
 
1,250.00
$      
Task 1
Task 2
Task 3
Task 4
Task 5
 Meetings & 
Public 
 Design 
Guidelines 
 Data Collection 
and Analysis 
 SBL Feasibility 
Study 
 Regional Sig. 
Report 
Total Cost
$14,938.36
$20,513.20
$21,611.90
$19,242.63
$2,442.92
$78,749.01
$50.00
$600.00
$0.00
$600.00
$0.00
$1,250.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
14,988.36
$     
21,113.20
$     
21,611.90
$          
19,842.63
$       
2,442.92
$         
$79,999.01
CONTRACT BUDGET BY TASK ORDER
BUDGET OF DIRECTLY REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
 BUDGET OF PERSONNEL BY TASK NUMBER
TOTAL BUDGET 
Meeting Expense
** Input Raw Hourly Rates TWO DECIMAL PLACES ONLY and use most current information
***   Invoices should relfect ACTUAL RATES for Prime Consultant Personnel
Reimbursable Expenses
Total Labor With Overhead and Fee
Total Prime Reimbursable Expenses
Total Subconsultant Costs
Adjustments
Graphic Design
TOTAL COST SUMMARY
GRAND TOTAL
Total Labor Budget With Overhead & Fees
Total Prime Reimbursable Expenses