Work Session Presentation

City of Chandler — Work Session (2023-02-23)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 16927 characters
Economic Development Division | February 2023 |
Mayor’s 4-Corner Retail 
Committee Report Update

Background
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update
•
Mayor’s 4-Corner Retail Committee was assembled in Fall 2011
•
Committee had 22 members:
•
Property owners, brokers, developers, builders, architects, attorneys, citizens, and 
the Chandler Chamber of Commerce
•
Included representation from different property specializations – multifamily, retail, 
office and industrial
•
Evaluated intersections where retail was the dominant use, with high vacancy rates 
and questionable long-term viability
•
Made recommendations to support redevelopment of underutilized properties
2

Key Issues in 2011
•
The opening of Chandler Fashion Center in 2001 led to the relocation of many national 
retail tenants to the mall area
•
The opening of the Loop 202 Santan Freeway resulted in a shift in traffic patterns, 
affecting the viability of shopping centers and retailers in older areas of Chandler
•
The opening of the Loop 202 Santan Freeway also led to the development of several 
new power centers, attracting many national tenants
•
The global financial crisis resulted in bankruptcies and store closures in the retail 
industry that had a significant impact on Chandler
•
The financial crisis also affected consumer spending and population growth in Chandler
3
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update

Alma School Road and Elliot Road
Intersections Studied
4
Big Box vacancy
Data Sources: CoStar (Vacancy), ESRI Business Analyst (Area Population), City of Chandler (Traffic Count)
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update
Statistic
2011
2022
Intersection Retail Vacancy Rate
53%
14%
Estimated Area Population 
(3-Mile Radius)
124,117
131,465
Intersection Traffic Count
67,200
50,800
Major redevelopment/adaptive reuse/infill projects: 
El Dorado High School

Intersections Studied
5
Alma School Road and Warner Road
Big Box vacancy
Anticipated
Multifamily
Redevelopment
Anticipated
Multifamily
Redevelopment
Data Sources: CoStar (Vacancy), ESRI Business Analyst (Area Population), City of Chandler (Traffic Count)
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update
Statistic
2011
2022
Intersection Retail Vacancy Rate
20%
15%
Estimated Area Population 
(3-Mile Radius)
136,217
148,544
Intersection Traffic Count
62,100
58,700
Major redevelopment/adaptive reuse/infill projects: 
Chandler Preparatory Academy

Intersections Studied
6
Alma School Road and Ray Road
Big Box vacancy
City-
Owned
Data Sources: CoStar (Vacancy), ESRI Business Analyst (Area Population), City of Chandler (Traffic Count)
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update
Statistic
2011
2022
Intersection Retail Vacancy Rate
40%
0%
Estimated Area Population 
(3-Mile Radius)
134,895
147,722
Intersection Traffic Count
61,100
59,100
Major redevelopment/adaptive reuse/infill projects: 
VASA Fitness

Intersections Studied
7
Big Box vacancy
Alma School Road and Queen Creek Road
Data Sources: CoStar (Vacancy), ESRI Business Analyst (Area Population), City of Chandler (Traffic Count)
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update
Statistic
2011
2022
Intersection Retail Vacancy Rate
33%
10%
Estimated Area Population 
(3-Mile Radius)
68,459
91,158
Intersection Traffic Count
44,700
48,500
Major redevelopment/adaptive reuse/infill projects: 
Big Air Trampoline Park, Alta Boulders & Fitness

Intersections Studied
8
Big Box vacancy
Arizona Avenue and Warner Road
Data Sources: CoStar (Vacancy), ESRI Business Analyst (Area Population), City of Chandler (Traffic Count)
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update
Statistic
2011
2022
Intersection Retail Vacancy Rate
22%
7%
Estimated Area Population 
(3-Mile Radius)
137,708
148,097
Intersection Traffic Count
62,100
57,400
Major redevelopment/adaptive reuse/infill projects:
Bella Grace apartments, AZ Compass Prep School, Uptown Jungle, 
Alta Uptown apartments (planned)

Intersections Studied
9
Big Box vacancy
Cooper Road and Ray Road
Gilbert
Data Sources: CoStar (Vacancy), ESRI Business Analyst (Area Population), City of Chandler (Traffic Count)
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update
Statistic
2011
2022
Intersection Retail Vacancy Rate
68%
3%
Estimated Area Population 
(3-Mile Radius)
121,613
138,691
Intersection Traffic Count
44,500
49,400
Major redevelopment/adaptive reuse/infill projects:
EōS Fitness, Cooper Crossing office space

Intersections Studied
10
Big Box vacancy
McQueen Road and Pecos Drive
Medical
Reuse
Medical
Reuse
Data Sources: CoStar (Vacancy), ESRI Business Analyst (Area Population), City of Chandler (Traffic Count)
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update
Statistic
2011
2022
Intersection Retail Vacancy Rate
45%
5%
Estimated Area Population 
(3-Mile Radius)
103,191
127,301
Intersection Traffic Count
40,500
42,400
Major redevelopment/adaptive reuse/infill projects:
KTR Indoor Action Sports Playground, McQueen Medical Center

Uptown Chandler
11
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update
•
Place branding initiative launched in 2017 to 
raise awareness of the area with participation 
from a group of key stakeholders
•
Established a name for the area that is now 
used by real estate brokers, developers, and 
businesses (not ‘donut hole’ anymore)
•
Branding positions the area’s unique character 
as a strength for business attraction and 
redevelopment (casual, eclectic, authentic)
•
Banners and traffic signal cabinet art installed 
to enhance sense of place within the area

Infill Projects
12
• Project Name:
Uptown Commons
• Location: 
Arizona Avenue and Elliot Road (NEC)
• Status: 
Approved
• Former Use: 
Vacant Lot
• Future Use:
Apartment Complex (252 Units)
• Project Name:
Elevation AZ 87
• Location: 
Arizona Avenue and Elliot Road (SEC)
• Status: 
Approved
• Former Use: 
Vacant Lot
• Future Use:
Apartment Complex (199 Units)
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update

Redevelopment Projects
13
• Project Name:
Alta Uptown
• Location: 
Arizona Avenue and Corporate Place (SEC)
• Status: 
Approved
• Former Use: 
Auto Dealership Parking Lot
• Future Use:
Apartment Complex (425 Units)
• Project Name:
Alta Chandler at the Park
• Location: 
Alma School Road and Parklane Boulevard (SWC)
• Status: 
Under Construction
• Former Use: 
Office Buildings
• Future Use:
Apartment Complex (291 Units)
• Project Name:
TBD
• Location: 
Alma School Road and Warner Road (NEC)
• Status: 
Proposed
• Former Use: 
Sun Village Fair Shopping Center
• Future Use:
Apartment Complex
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update

Retail Market: Then vs. Now
Overall Retail
Vacancy Rates
14
Big Box Vacancy
(10,000+ Square Feet)
*In 2011, the committee defined “East Valley” as consisting of Mesa, Gilbert and Chandler
•
Retail vacancy rate in Chandler is 
currently at a 15-year low
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update
Area
2011 (Q3)
2022 (Q3)
Phoenix Metro
12.4%
5.2%
East Valley*
16.2%
5.2%
Chandler
13.2%
4.6%
Area
2011 (Q3)
2022 (Q3)
East Valley
• 117 buildings
• 3.5M SF
• 42 buildings
• 1.5M SF
Chandler
• 30 buildings
• 870,000 SF
• 8 buildings
• 320,000 SF
•
Property owners continue to have a 
hard time finding new retail tenants 
for vacant big box space

Industrial & Office: Then vs. Now
Overall Retail
Vacancy Rates
15
Big Box Vacancy
(10,000+ Square Feet)
•
Retail vacancy rate in Chandler is 
currently at a 15-year low
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update
•
Property owners continue to have a 
hard time finding new retail tenants 
for vacant big box space
Uptown Chandler Industrial Vacancy
15.0%
0.4%
11.9%
4.1%
Uptown Chandler Office Vacancy
Data Sources: CoStar (Vacancy), MAG Employer Database (Jobs)
•
Economic recovery in these areas has also included base industry growth and new job 
creation. From 2011 to 2021, Uptown Chandler added more than 580 jobs.

Area Plan Updates
16
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update
•
Development Services concept approach is to do ‘neighborhood level’ updates based 
on the characteristics of each area. Proposed sequence is as follows:
1. Southside Village Area: boundaries are Frye Road to Pecos Road (north to south), 
and Arizona Avenue to the Union Pacific Railroad from (west to east)
2. Downtown Area: boundaries are Chandler Boulevard to Frye Road (north to south), 
and San Marcos Estates to Union Pacific Railroad (west to east) 
3. North Arizona Avenue Area: boundaries to be determined
4. East Chandler Boulevard Area: boundaries to be determined

City Code/Zoning Code Updates
17
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update
•
Proposing to bring City Code/Zoning Code updates to City Council in groups. The first 
group would be concurrent with the first area plan update (Southside Village Area):
1. Building setbacks for infill development
2. Building height trigger for midrise overlay (45’ to 50’) 
3. Murals
4. Mechanical screening
5. Blade sign limitations (enlarge)
6. Single-family permitted in MF-1, MF-2 and MF-3 districts by right
7. Driveways/front yard paving regulations (establish maximum paving allowances)
8. Alleys (permit primary vehicular/pedestrian access)
•
February 2023 kickoff for Area Plan Updates and City Code/Zoning Code Updates

Other Staff Recommendations
18
•
Economic Development is also working on recommendations to support 
redevelopment and placemaking projects:
1. Expand Adaptive Reuse Overlay District Boundaries
•
Issue: The Adaptive Reuse 
Overlay District has been 
successful in facilitating reuse 
projects, but its geographic 
scope is very limited
•
Proposal: Expand the district 
boundaries to include all parts 
of Chandler north of Loop 202
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update

19
2. Expand the Commercial Reinvestment Program boundaries to match proposed 
Adaptive Reuse Overlay District and shift focus of program funding
•
Issue: Program was created to 
provide reimbursements to 
private property owners for 
redevelopment activities, but 
most financial support is not 
legal per court ruling of 
Arizona’s Gift Clause
•
Proposal: Use funds on public 
infrastructure upgrades, land 
acquisition/assembly, and 
placemaking projects
Shade Structures
Pedestrian Lighting
Murals
Midblock Crossings
Protected Bike Lanes
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update
Other Staff Recommendations

20
3. Advocate for changes to state legislation that would encourage the redevelopment of 
underutilized properties to provide new housing units
• While redevelopment often seems like an obvious answer, there are additional costs 
and risks that property owners/developers need to take into consideration:
Fragmented 
Ownership
Approval 
Processes
Site Prep/
Restoration
Pace of 
Development
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update
Other Staff Recommendations

City Redevelopment Powers
21
• Existing state legislation empowers 
municipalities to engage in redevelopment, 
but it cannot produce the large-scale 
housing development needed in Arizona.
• Government processes are slow.
• Eminent domain is highly contentious.
• Revenue bonds for redevelopment 
projects are higher risk and less 
attractive to investors than other 
revenue bonds (e.g., utilities bonds).
ARS Title 36 - Public Health and Safety
Chapter 12 PUBLIC HOUSING
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update

City Redevelopment Powers
22
• Additional legislation could be enacted to help municipalities better support private 
sector led redevelopment projects.
• One idea would be to allow municipalities to authorize a temporary property 
reclassification for redevelopment projects that create new housing units.
• Reclassifying to Class Six would lower the assessment ratio from 10% to 5% for 
residential projects, substantially reducing property taxes. Over time, cumulative 
savings would offset the higher costs of redevelopment. 
• Factoring this benefit into a pro forma, developers would be able to see they can 
achieve their required internal rate of return from the redevelopment project.
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update

Proposed State Legislation
23
Process for Municipalities to Authorize Property Reclassification:
Developer submits a site analysis to the municipality explaining how the property 
satisfies the conditions for a slum or blighted area designation under ARS 36-1471.
Municipality adopts a resolution pursuant to ARS 36-1473 finding and declaring the site 
a slum or blighted area and that redevelopment is necessary.
Developer submits a redevelopment plan to the municipality pursuant to ARS 36-1479.
Municipality contracts for an economic and fiscal impact analysis pursuant to proposed 
section ARS 36-1492.
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update

Proposed State Legislation
24
Process for Municipalities to Authorize Property Reclassification (continued):
Developer and municipality enter into a redevelopment contract authorizing real 
property reclassification to Class Six for seven years (5% assessment ratio).
County assessor establishes a base tax payment using the current year real property tax 
bill. During reclassification, property taxes paid to any district cannot be less than its 
share of the base tax payment.
Property significantly increases in value following redevelopment. Developer pays lower 
property taxes than usual due to reclassification, helping to offset site restoration costs.
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update

Case Study
25
Sun Village Fair Towne Center
• Built in 1991
• 158,000 SF of retail space on 17.3 acres
•
Grocery store anchor left in 2016; 
84,000 SF space remains unfilled
•
Current occupancy rate is 23%
•
Tenant mix includes cash for gold, 
payday loan, furniture rental businesses
Riata Apartments
• Built in 2019
• 300 units on 8.6 acres 
(50% of Sun Village land area)
•
93% occupancy rate (City avg. is 92%)
•
$1,810 average rent (City avg. is $1,886)
•
Sold in November 2020 
$91 million / $303,333 per unit
Data Sources: CoStar commercial real estate database
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update

Case Study: Property Taxes
26
Sun Village Fair Towne Center
Riata Apartments
Data Sources: Maricopa County Assessor’s Office, Maricopa County Treasurer’s Office 
2021 Taxes
Full Cash Value
$11,451,400
Limited Property Value (LPV) 
$10,851,271
Assessment Ratio
18%
Assessed LPV
$1,953,228
Property Tax Bill
$232,520
Property Tax / SF Land
$0.31
2021 Taxes
Full Cash Value
$66,000,000
Limited Property Value (LPV) 
$42,777,000
Assessment Ratio
10%
Assessed LPV
$4,277,700
Property Tax Bill
$469,088
Property Tax / SF Land
$1.25
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update

Case Study: Property Taxes
27
Sun Village Fair Towne Center
Riata Apartments
Data Sources: Maricopa County Assessor’s Office, Maricopa County Treasurer’s Office 
2021 Taxes
Full Cash Value
$11,451,400
Limited Property Value (LPV) 
$10,851,271
Assessment Ratio
18%
Assessed LPV
$1,953,228
Property Tax Bill
$232,520
Property Tax / SF Land
$0.31
2021 Taxes If Reclassification Was Applied
Full Cash Value
$66,000,000
Limited Property Value (LPV) 
$42,777,000
Assessment Ratio
5%
Assessed LPV
$2,138,850
Property Tax Bill
$234,544
Property Tax / SF Land
$0.62
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update

Case Study: Fiscal Impact Analysis
28
Data Sources: Used “Community Project Assessment System” developed for the City of Chandler by Applied Economics
Sun Village Fair: Inputs & Assumptions
• 158,000 SF shopping center
• No investments made in renovations
• 35,658 occupied SF (23% occupied)
• $22 per SF annual lease rate
• $300 per SF average in-store retail sales
• 65 full-time employees (1 per 550 SF)
• $41,600 average salary ($20 per hour)
Riata Apartments: Inputs & Assumptions
• 300 new housing units constructed
• $81.9 million capital investment
• 18-month construction period
• 50% occupied in year built; 93% after
• $1,810 per unit rent
• $86,880 average household income
• Reclassification benefit for first 7 years
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update

Case Study: Fiscal Impact Analysis
29
Data Sources: Used “Community Project Assessment System” developed for the City of Chandler by Applied Economics
Sun Village Fair: 10-Year Impacts
• Negative net fiscal impact on the city
• Net income of -$81,307 
• General Fund Revenues:
$1.67M
• General Fund Expenses:
$1.75M
• Revenues include property taxes, 
commercial lease tax, retail sales tax, 
local spending by employees
• Most significant expense is public safety
Riata Apartments: 10-Year Impacts
• Positive net fiscal impact on the city
• Net income of $1.94M
• General Fund Revenues:
$5.21M
• General Fund Expenses:
$3.27M
• Revenues include property taxes, building 
permit/plan review fees, construction TPT, 
residential lease tax, state shared 
revenues, local spending by residents
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update

30
•
The 4-Corner report intersections are performing better now than in 2011 with 
redevelopment/reuse projects and an improved retail market lowering vacancies.
•
The City has actively helped to revitalize and bring new uses to these areas.
•
Staff recommends the City take the following additional, proactive steps:
•
Implement City Code/Zoning Code Updates
•
Expand Adaptive Reuse Overlay District
•
Invest in Placemaking Activities
•
Strategic Parcel Assemblage
•
Work with Partners to Propose Redevelopment Legislation
Mayor’s 4-Corner Report Update
Recap & Staff Recommendations

Thank you!  Questions?