Extracted text (via ocr_local)
28787 characters
rca
noe Canyon Oaks Estates tt Zz.
0
a
Planned Community
Preliminary Development
Design Review
Submittal
City of Chandler
215 East Buffalo Street
Chandler, Arizona 85244
Prepared For:
Standard Pacific of Arizona, Inc.
6710 N. Scottsdale Rd., Ste. 150
Scottsdale, Az 85253
INDEX .
EXHIBIT
INTRODUCTION.......ccccccceceecccueccecceceeceeueseecesueceeceuaeeeeees 1
THE SITE....c.ccccccccccussseccccecccecscuuceecceeeececeunnneeceeuneceeuaeesss 9
FLOOR PLANS, ELEVATIONS, BUILDING
ARCHITECTURE. .....cccccsccccccccccsecececccceuuceeeseeeeeceuuuanneeeceess 3
EXTERIOR COLOR PALETTE. .........ccccece ec eee nent ee ee ee ea en eneeee 4
CANYON OAKS ESTATES
Preliminary Development
Design Review
PURPOSE:
This submittal for a Preliminary Development Design Review, which is required by the City of
Chandler for all subdivisions to be developed, allows the City staff to review the proposal and to
make comments regarding design issues before building begins. Standard Pacific of Arizona,
Inc. (“Standard Pacific”) is in their final stages to begin construction on a parcel within Canyon
Oaks Estates. The enclosed information and exhibits regarding Standard Pacific’s proposal for
Canyon Oaks Estates is included in this document for review by the City staff.
HISTORY:
Canyon Oaks Estates is a 141 acre planned community consisting of single-family, multi-family,
and commercial zoning designations (see Exhibit “A”). The area is bounded by Pecos Road on
the north, the future alignment of the San Tan Freeway on the south, the Consolidated Canal on
the west, and Cooper Road on the east (see Exhibit “B”) and is legally described within this
Preliminary Development Design Review submittal (see Exhibit “C”). The land is currently
vacant and has been under agricultural uses (see Exhibit “D”). However, Standard Pacific has
acquired the single-family portion of the project and is finalizing the plat through the City of
Chandler (see Exhibit “E”). Upon overall build-out of Canyon Oaks Estates the community will
consist of a variety of housing types, a neighborhood commercial site, and a system of open
space areas and park sites that are interconnected throughout the community and link the
neighborhoods to the Park Paseo on the western boundary. The goal of the Canyon Oaks Estates
master planned community is to create a village and not individual independent subdivisions that
do not connect or blend appropriately.
Standard Pacific is in the process of finalizing the remaining details to begin constructing three
distinct products. Canyon Oaks Estates will provide a diverse range of housing opportunities
allowing for a mix of income levels, lifestyles, and living environments integral in forming a
stable, diverse, and lasting neighborhood as well as community. These single-family
neighborhoods will feature lot sizes of 7,200, 8,000 and 10,000 square feet minimum. In
addition, the remaining residential area will offer an opportunity for multi-family development.
DESIGN:
Standard Pacific offers residential products that incorporate the necessary architectural elements
to create a diverse and aesthetically pleasing street scene. These products include elements such
as defined entryways, enclosed three (3) car garages, exterior elevations with varied roof lines,
building footprint offsets, and architectural projections. Each product will offer a range of
elevations, roof tile selections, and color choices to enable the home buyers to individualize their
home. Additionally, Standard Pacific has designed their neighborhoods to reflect Chandler’s
Residential Development Standards proposed within the master planned community zoning
document.
The Residential Development Standards approved and being implemented are as follows:
Subdivision Design:
1, Standard — Provide a curvilinear street system with safe traffic sight visabilities,
particularly at intersections.
Implementation — The entire street system was designed using a curvilinear street
system including the collector streets and the local streets within each of the
neighborhoods. Particular attention was paid to the visibility at intersections
through the use of open space and landscape tracts.
2. Standard — Provide a sense of neighborhood arrival through design of the entry
street intersecting the arterial or major collector featuring such elements as
monument signing, special landscape, specialty pavement, enhanced fence/wall
details, boulevard medians, etc.
Implementation — The collector street entrance from Pecos Road, Riggs Road and
Val Vista Road are being designed with an entry feature containing landscape and
entry monumentation. ;
3. Standard — Provide a means of vehicular access to rear yards, other than alleys,
for keeping cars, small boats and trailers, all of which must be effectively
screened from view by six (6) ft. fence walls, solid gates, and landscaping.
Implementation — A ten (10) foot minimum side setback is provided on one side
of the lot and adequate solid gates will be required to allow the storage of cars,
small boats, and trailers behind the walls.
4. Standard — Widen corner lots by at least ten (10) ft. more than the interior lots on
that block.
Implementation — Corner lots are ten (10) feet wider than interior lots.
Standard — Stagger the rear setback lines for all lots backing onto an arterial street
to achieve a range of ten (10) ft. or more (no rear yard setback shall be less than
twenty (20) ft. from the property line to a single story structure, and not less than
thirty (30) ft. for a two-story setback). A covered patio may extend into this
minimum rear yard setback no more than ten (10) ft., provided; however, that a
minimum twenty (20) ft. setback from the rear property line to the patio cover
posts is retained.
Implementation — Rear setbacks along arterials will vary between twenty (20) and
thirty (30) feet for all single story homes and will be a minimum of thirty (30) feet
for two story homes. Lot depths along arterials were increased to allow for this
additional setback.
Standard — Provide retention areas that meander through the subdivision as a
greenbelt, rather than a single rectangular basin.
Implementation — Open space corridors are being provided throughout this
development. These corridors will also be used for storm water retention. These
corridors vary in width and are expanded in size at key locations to serve aesthetic
and functional (recreational) purposes (see Exhibit “F”).
Standard — Provide landscaped open spaces, visible from arterial street view as
well as from residential street view.
Implementation — Landscaped tracts are provided in areas along Pecos Road and
Cooper Road. These tracts provide openings to landscaped corridors within the
development. They are visible from the residential streets as well as the arterials
(see Exhibit “G”).
Standard — Design and improve retention areas to be useable and accessible, i.e.,
not inundated by 10-year storm volumes for certain recreational purposes, such
as, basketball, volleyball, or tot lots, etc., as well as for specific site and
architectural amenities such as ramadas, benches, par courses, etc.
Implementation — The open areas will only partially be used for retention. The
remainder of the space will be usable as pedestrian linkages as well as active and
passive recreation (see Exhibit “H”).
Standard - Provide a minimum ten (10) ft. landscaped parkway measured from the
right-of-way line to the fence wall, in a common area to be maintained by an
association, where lots back onto an arterial street and five (5) ft. when backing to
a local or collector street.
10.
11.
Implementation — The design of Canyon Oaks Estates provides for a ten (10) ft.
minimum landscaped buffer along all arterial streets and collector streets. These
buffers have been expanded wherever possible.
Standard — Provide staggers or other breaks to relieve the linear character of
perimeter fence walls adjoining arterial streets.
Implementation — Staggered perimeter wall setbacks are provided along the
arterial streets.
Standard — Within a multi-parcel PAD, provided a differential of a least 2,000 sq.
ft. between the minimum lot size of two (2) or more parcels. In addition, credit
for another “diversity element” may be granted if such differential results in a
parcel with a minimum lot size of 12,000 sq. ft.
Implementation — Single family parcels range in minimum lot size from 7,200
square feet to 10,000 square feet.
Residential Design:
l,
Standard — Provide significant architectural differences in the choice of elevations
offered for each floor plan, e.g., roof lines, exterior colors, etc.
Implementation — Standard Pacific is providing three to four (3-4) elevations for
each model including facade treatment and five (5) different paint color schemes.
(see Exhibit “T”).
Standard — Prohibit the same front elevation on adjoining home products; prohibit
the same rear elevations on adjoining homes visible from arterial street view.
Implementation — Standard Pacific is providing four (4) elevations for each
model. This will provide a variety of home models and elevation options for each
lot; thus insuring that the same front or rear elevation will not be used on
adjoining homes.
Standard — De-emphasize garage fronts as the most prominent architectural
feature of the dwelling front, e.g., incorporate side access garage, “in-line”
garages, L-shape floor plans, etc.
Implementation — This will be accomplished in several ways, including front
porches, surrounds, and side entry garages. The use of tandem garages and split
garages will de-emphasize 3-car garage fronts.
4. Standard — Emphasize distinctive architectural details in the front elevations, e.g.,
covered front entries, covered front porches, door and window details, roof
overhangs, parapet walls with cap features, etc.
Implementation — Standard Pacific will provide many of the above elements to
give a distinctive architectural detail.
5. Standard — Provide a variety of roofing colors, textures, and component shapes,
e.g., “barrel” tile and flat concrete tile.
Implementation — Standard Pacific will provide the option of varying roof colors,
textures, and shapes.
6. Standard — Provide screening or other accommodation for trash containers,
recycling bins, household tools and equipment.
Implementation — The side yard fence will provide necessary screening of trash
containers, recycling bins, household tools and equipment.
ie Standard — Provide a variety of front yard landscape packages installed by the
homebuilder. :
Implementation — Standard Pacific will provide landscape packages for the front
yard, However, buyers of these larger homes prefer individuality and custom
designs for their front and rear landscaping. All plans are reviewed by the
Architectural Committee of the Homebuilder Association.
SUMMATION:
Standard Pacific’s innovative use of incorporating cost effective architectural details, as well as
lot and street layout, provides for diversity and a sense of place. Standard Pacific creates quality
products that are affordable for individuals at all income levels, which instills a greater sense of
pride and thus a more sustainable community. The results of individuals living with a Standard
Pacific home as well as within Canyon Oaks Estates will maintain a high quality of life as
individuals and as a community, thus benefiting the City of Chandler.
STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES
CANYON OAKS ESTATES
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOUSING DESIGN REVIEW
; DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, this Agreement is entered into as of the
day of , 1999 (the “Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF
CHANDLER, a municipal corporation of the State of Arizona (“City”) and STANDARD
PACIFIC OF ARIZONA, INC., a Delaware Corporation (“Developer”).
RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, Developer owns, intends to acquire and/or is developing certain real
property located at the southeast corner of Pecos Road and Cooper Road in the City of Chandler,
commonly known as Canyon Oaks Estates (the “Project”);
B. WHEREAS, effective January 20, 1997, City adopted (pursuant to Ordinance No.
2672) certain development and other fees (“Development Fees”) that apply to development
located within the City of Chandler, including the Project, with respect to building permits issued
by City subsequent to January 20, 1997;
Cc. WHEREAS, proposed legislation (HB 2136) is pending in the Arizona
Legislature, and other legislation may be introduced from time to time in the future, that, if
adopted, may affect City’s imposition of Development Fees;
D. WHEREAS, Developer and City are entering into this Agreement pursuant to the
provisions of A.R.S. £9-500.05 to facilitate development of the Project by providing for public
infrastructure improvements;
E. WHEREAS, Developer is desirous of proceedings with the actions required by
City in order to issue building permits for structures within the Project upon the terms and
conditions set forth in this Agreement; and
F, WHEREAS, City is willing to proceed with the actions required to issue building
permits if it is assured that it will receive funds to provide public infrastructure improvements as
provided herein.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and representations set
forth herein and in the Recitals hereto, City and Developer agree as follows:
1, Upon Developer’s request, City shall issue building permits for the structures to
be built within the Project. The Development Fees shall be payable prior to issuance of the
building permits for such structures and subject to the provisions of paragraphs 4 and 5 of this
Agreement. City represents that Exhibit B (“Development Fee Schedule”) is a schedule of all
Development Fees in effect, as of January 20, 1997, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2672. In the
future City may add new development fees or increased fees from the date of the levy of the new
or increased fees upon any other development of similar type structures within the City, but this
agreement shall not be construed to mean that Developer has agreed to a new fee or an increase
in fees.
2. Subject to the provisions of paragraphs 4 and 5 of this Agreement, the
Development Fees set forth on Exhibit B (less all applicable credits for qualifying offsite
improvements installed by Developer) shall be due and payable prior to issuance of building
permits for the Project, irrespective of any subsequent legislation affecting development fees
generally.
3. Subject to the provisions of paragraphs 4 and 5 of this Agreement, Developer
agrees that the imposition of the Development Fees is warranted by, related to an proportionate
with the anticipated impact of the Project upon City’s public infrastructure and Developer waives
any right to reimbursement of such Development Fees, except as otherwise agreed between City
and Developer or pursuant to existing City policy or practice (e.g., reimbursement for the cost
differential of “up-sizing” utility lines to accommodate the City’s master plan or other needs).
4. City and Developer recognize and acknowledge that future legislation, City
Council action and/or changes in City policy with respect to amounts payable in respect of the
development of similar type structures, whether such levies are presently existing or hereinafter
imposed as development fees or otherwise (hereinafter referred to as the “Assessment Burden”),
may result in the City’s elimination, reduction or waiver of some or all development fees, or the
failure to levy development fees, in whole or in part, upon other development constructing or
planning to construct similar type structures within the City. City agrees that Developer shall be
entitled to the benefit of equal treatment in respect of the Assessment Burden applicable to the
Project (determined on a proportion and uniform basis), it being the intent of this provision that
no develop or development of similar type structures on property within the City shall bear an
Assessment Burden which, taking into account all amounts comprising the Assessment Burden,
is less than that levied upon Developer and/or the Project pursuant to the terms of this Agreement
or is computed on a basis more favorable to any other developer; provided, however, that
nothing in the foregoing shall be construed to require the City to extend to Developer or the
Project the benefit of any reduction in the Assessment Burden which is judicially imposed on
the City with respect to developers or developments of similar type structures on property within
the City if such developments were approved by the City on or before February 13, 1997.
5. In the event any proposed development of similar type structures on property
within the City is zoned or otherwise approved for development on or after February 13, 1997,
and is granted the benefit of future legislation resulting in a retroactive reduction in proportionate
and uniform basis, retroactive to the date first extended to such other development.
6. City and Developer further recognize and acknowledge that, due to the potential
impact of future legislation upon the City’s ability to levy Development Fees upon developers of
structures within the city, City may elect to impose a moratorium or to otherwise cease issuing
building permits for certain types or classes of structures within the city. In the event of any
such moratorium or cessation, and notwithstanding any such action by City, Developer shall
have the right to proceed with the Project, and to obtain all required building permits from City
upon Developer’s payment of the Development Fees required by this Agreement.
ds This Agreement is biding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors and
assigns of the parties hereto and the rights and obligations hereby created are assignable in whole
or in part by Developer. ‘
8. The Recitals set forth in paragraphs A through F, inclusive, of this Agreement,
and the Schedule of Development Fees attached as Exhibit B are incorporated in this Agreement
by reference as if fully set forth herein.
9. This Agreement is the result of negotiations between the parties and shall not be
construed against any party as a consequence of its role or the role of its counsel in the drafting
of this agreement.
10. Nothing in this Agreement shall preclude City from the reasonable exercise of its
normal zoning, platting and review processes.
11. This Agreement represents the entire agreement of the parties with respect to its
subject matter, and all agreements, oral or written, entered into prior to this Agreement are
revoked and superseded by this Agreement. This Agreement may not be changed, modified or
rescinded, except in writing, signed by all parties and any attempt at oral modification of this
Agreement shall be void and of no effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement through their
representatives duly authorized to execute this document and bind their respective entities to the
terms and obligations herein contained on the date and year first written above.
CITY OF CHANDLER, a municipal
Corporation of the State of Arizona
ATTEST:
By:
City Clerk Jay Tibshraeny
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: Developer:
CITY ATTORNEY
, 1999
of
By:
*
Its:
COUNTY OF MARICOPA )
)ss
State of Arizona )
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of
by , in his/her capacity of
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
a Area Al
—
. Ed
\ eS
40” WDE LANDSCAPING BUFFER AREA ———-
—- PROPOSED PECOS FREEWAY -- -
Loop 202
= PATH SYSTEM
COOPER ROAD
Lonceionn PLAGE ———-—1
FUNTLocK PLACE—-———}
DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN
Amenity Summary.
Area AS
SSS ocs
Seer
Tor uot
Path System
Pay cont
PECOS ROAD _
Canyon OGaks Estates
Site Data__
Lot Min Let
Typo
Deensens
emma
a GSriae
3 sevi20
Beenie
{Total Sing’e Farmiy
Pam (Pond Pian :Rotonten . 16 6 acres 16% of me Siecle Famvy Project Amo
tecuced ct ype Sutovsera)
802 acres net Area eLor
asa ees in
Dba remy eF-2 ‘He a2
Bares 33
Typica! Renicental Sveat Wictn
| ayprea! Cosecser Suet Wists,
|7ymcal Arteria! Steet vern 112)
ag-1
PLttit £0 AREA DEVELCPYENT
= AHcmeowners' Assccatcn wl be creates for ne pummcsa of mantanarca
fall common areas, tandecaze bacss, and apen seace
= Al ereem vl be consiucted to tne Mancepa County and ina Cey et
Charger eandards
= Alutines #4 be located undergreuns
Subdivision Diversity Elements,
in.
i eeperaied wann ths pan
1 Quvinoar eroet cys
2 Gi-de-sacs deray ‘esto
pdb
U0 srost
pd/sauacy Assoctares, +
CHANDLER, ARIZONA
CANYON OAKS ESTATES
P
pd/sauney Assoclares, °
PES ST ate”
== _
ld Area 1 - Section
Eon nea 1 Rotemnon One Section A
DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN Canyon Oaks Estates
Typical Site Details CHANDLER, ARIZONA Ly i
CANYON OAKS ESTATES
POSUERE ETE ES
Section B
V2 SCALE
(4Entry Monument Sectian A
va neuen,
DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN
Entry Monument / Theme Wall
(4 Entry Monument Plan View
va peat
Sang Oaks is
Pas
pd/sauney Associates
ea TEE ee Bre en
{dEntry Monument Elevation A
ve scAE
Canyon Gaks Estates
CHANDLER, ARIZONA
(ds)
wi
CANYON OAKS ESTATES
Ti
WOM ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
THAT STAIOARD PACT. OF ARIZONA. WC. A OCLAWARE CORPORATION, 440 CANYON OAKS ESTATES, LF. A CALE Gnas
TS ARON SMe “Se rapanca OnNG, NEL A CALFORMA CORPORATION. (75 SOLE OOMMAL FARTHER, AS, OWNERS
‘HeeR THe MANE OF CANTON OAKS ESTATEE, A SUDOIVISIN OF A, PORTION
nt, . Mates “unhicora COUNTY, AMIZQMA, AS,
Tad tat’ Badal sa rhe “ouar or ‘sara canyon oav’s CRTATES A)
Steno a to? fe
* mo Mencay BeELAREE That 340)
Bis Venn Tre cocation ano Ones. Tre OMEWSIONS OF THE, LOTS, STMELTS, ADO, ‘cons ‘ai 0,
He en Sincere AND TACT SHALL DE KNOWN OY THE MARDER, HAM OR ‘oe eseccrreny
10 PLAT HELVOCD
Noe ABOVE OCHENOCO PREMSES,
TRACTS &, 6, 0. EF. 0. Mh dU MM
Fon ANaCAPM, STOR WATEA AETENTION, Ft
TRACT At MEREDY OCOICAYED TO THE PUBLIC AND WHL DE MAMTARED OY THE CITY OF CHAMKXER,
Jaaets 8, DEF. GML ML MM OP. O,U VK YZ AMO AA ARE MOT TO BC COETRUED TO BC DEDICATED,
TRACT 0. oO Fane To" at GEDEATEO YO CANYON OAXE ESTATES COMAMTY ASSOCIATION FOR IT2, USE AMO EXJOWMENT
To THR PUOLIG, OUT A INCTHE SECLARATION OF COVEMAMTS, CONATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND SHALL BE AESPONSIOLE
Fon toe UnmtTeNance THERCOY
TRACT RIB RESERVED FOR FUTUME MULT-TAMLY USE
‘Ownen OF TRACY A.
rmact $ 18 RESERVED FOR FUTURE vse,
OwntR OF TRACT 5.
THE MANTENANCE OF LANOSCAPINO WITH THE PUBLIC RIONT-OF-WAY TO THE DACK OF CURD SHALL OC THE RESPONGOLITY
Oe rme MOUCOWNERS ASSOCIATION, OR THE ADUTTING LOT / TRACT / PARCEL OWNER,
P.O, 7, U, Ve M. % Ye Z AND AA ARE MERCOY CEDKATED AG OPEN SPACE
Finan ACCESS, AMO STON ORABAOE. FACKITES.
HE MAMVTENAGHEE OF TRACT WIS THE ACSPONBOLITY OF THE
me of TACT Ts He NITY OF THE
iM wmecss WHERCOF,
STANOARO PACFIC OF ARIZONA, MC, A CELAWARE CORPORATION, AS OWNER HAS MERCUMTO CAUSCD ITS MAME TO
te arrmto ano Toe Sauc TO o¢ ATTESTED ay THe siowaTune oF
HEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED,
(aaa
STANOARD PACIFIC OF ARIZONA, NC. A DCLAWARE CORPORATION
——_—
CANYON OAKS CSTATES, LP A CALFORMA LIMAICO PARTNERS, BY TOPANGA OAKS, ME. A CALFORNIA CORPORATION ITS SOLE
CencnaL. PARTNER, AG OWNER HAS HEREUNTO CAUSED ITS MAME TO OC AFTOXED AMO ThE AME TO OC ATTESTED OY THC
SOWATURE OF ws MEREUNTO GIRLY AUTHORIZED,
CANYON OAKS ESTATES, LP A CALIFORNIA LRATED PARTHERSMP, BY TOPANGA OAKS, INC, A CALIFORMA CORPORATION, TE SOLE
CEMERAL PARTNER,
oy
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
STATE OF AMON ¢
county of uanicora) ©
| 190, DCFORE ME, THE WMECREINED NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED
OF STANOARO PacTic
on Tes pay oF
Teno THAT rere, AS
Gr anOWA, We. A OCLAWARE CORPORATION, BEND AUTHORIZED $0 70 D0, EXECUTED THE FONEGOMD RATFICATION M THE
APAGTY THERED STATED ANO FOR THE PURPOSES THEREM CONTAIN,
In WnTNCSS WHERCOF, | NAVE MERCUNTO SET MY NANO AMD OFFICIAL, SEAL.
oy. ar conaussion Exes)
NOTARY PUBLIC
KN MENT
STATE OF ARITONA
County oF uamcora) **
ay oF | 198, OEFORE ME, THE WHOERSIONED NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED
“avo THAT HE/SHE, AS (OF CANYON OAKS
TEIATEH, LP. A GAUFORMA LIMITED PARTHERSIEP, BY TOPANGA OAKS, MC A CALFORMA CORPORATION. ITE SOLE OOMCRAL
Ferree, Se omnen, sto AUTHoMZED $0. TO 00, EXEEUTEO THE FORCOOMD RANFICATION M THE CAPACTY THEREN STATED
{2x0 FOR The PURPOSES THERE CONTAMED,
weTMESS HEREOF, 1 HAVE HEREUNTO SET HY NANO AKO OFFICIAL SEAL.
on Tes
. uy comassion exemes,
wOTARY PUBLIC
RATIFICATION
by Ts RATRICATON,
COVIAINITY ASSOCIATION, ACHNOWLEDEEE THE RCEPONSOILITIS OCDICATED HERCHL,
wae
ouvy cuecteo _______ oF THE canvon oaxs cerares
Te Dare
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
STATE OF ANTON
County or MARICOPA
DAY OF 999, BEFORE ME, THE WHOERBIONED NOTARY PUBLIC, ERSONALLY APPEARED
“AMO THAT HEASHC, AS (OF CANYON OAKS
TaTATES COMANETY AETOCATION, DENG AUTNORZEO 20 TO DO, EXECUTED THE FOREGOMG RATEICATION M THE CAPACITY
“HEREM STATED ANO FOR THE PURPOSES THEREN CONTARED.
IM WITNESS WHEREOF, | HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND ANO OFFICAL, SEAL.
on THs,
ov wy cxpres;
TOTARY PUL
. FINAL PLAT
FOR
CANYON OAKS ESTATES
A PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 2
T. 2S. R. SE, G & S. R. B. & M, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA
PECOS ROAD
& yu
2
3 Hy
= Fa
wuss ROAD/>
Fr ‘SITE:
3 Pg
2 iS
3 fy
CERWANN ROAD
1cCINITY MAP
BASIS OF BEARING
WE CAST UME OF SEC 2 T2E, AIC, OLA AMO SALT
itm WERDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
WORTH WHEEH COUALS NOOTE'STW oma esTaTES®
IMeeonoed we DooK 0 PAGE 24, MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDS.
‘TRACT TABLE
“ACREAGE,
TRACT
N)_N
‘SECTION 38, TOWENP 1 SOUTH, RANCE 9 CAST.
SEGey SF Gusacor anase car m CONCRETE,
Shugere, 200 Monn OF INTERSECTION OF
fond An PECOS OAD I8 CAST OF
‘Tee 1S TO CERTIFY THAT TH PLAT 16 CORACCT ANO ACCURATE AND THC MONUMENTS OCSCROED HEREIN HAVE EER BEEN SET
(Om LOCATED AE OCACMIDED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BCLIT.
Kobets 3. Maeno Pa
AEoETERED Cana TURTETOR a
20268
CLOUSE ENOMECADG, We.
{a2 €, oRanbewood AVENUE
Poe, af 85020
Iz
JOTES
WOCATES A CORNER OF THIS SUDVIION. SCT 3/0" REDAR UMLESS NOTED OTMCAWEE,
MoMAMENTATION TO BE SCT AY COMPLETION OF MABS ORADMO.
CONTERLME OF STREET MOMUMENTATION, SURVEY MONUMENT TO DC SET PER PAVING PLAN (HAO OCY 20:
41
Puc IWOIGATES PUDLIC UTLITY CASEMENT UNLESS NOTED OTHENWHE
1 VMAC ——-NOICATES VENICULAR NON-ACCESS EASEMENT.
ALL LOT COMNERE SHALL OE SET WITH 172° REBAR,
[ALL UTRITIES AMO MOLE PHAEE ELECTRIC LMES ARE TO OC BYSTALLED UNOEROROUND,
CONSTRUCTION WITHN PUDLIC UTKITY EASEMENTS SHALL OC LIITED TO UTILITIES “AND WOOD, WARE OR REMOVABLE SECTION TYPE
FENGNO AND ORIVEWAYS.
No STRUCTURE OF ANY MO MAY BE CONSTRUCTED, OR ANY VEGETATION PLANTED HOR BC ALLOWED TO GROW WITHIN DRAWACE
CASCMENTS WHION WOULD BECO THE FLOW OF WATER THROUGH THE CASCMCNTS.
‘ALL T#ACTS NOT SEOEATED TO THE CTY OF OUNOLER SHALL DE MEROVED IN ACCOROCMCE WITH APPROVED PLANS AND
Becoco 70 tme HOMEOWNERS ASEOEITION AFTER PLAT RECORDATION.
onl REAR YARD SET DACK FOR A TWO STORY STRUCTURE SHALL OE THATY (30) FECT OM SESIONATED LOTS,
‘OMLY GROUND COVER ANO BUSHES ARC ALLOWED TO OC PLANTED WITH™ THE CALCMENT AREA. NO TACE 15 ALLOWED,
Ho. STRUCTURES OR LANOECAPWO ADOVE 24° D1 HEIGHT ALLOWED WITHIN VISIDKITY CASEMENT EXCEPT TREES WITH BRANCHES
SGr TERS" HRak 8" Anave Tre enowno. si me
anys REAR YARD ZET BACK FOR A TWO STORY STRUCTURE SHALL OC THATY (30) FEET ON DESIGNATED LOTS,
‘THE SUDOVISION SHALL. COMPLY WITH THE RESIDENTIAL OUDELINES FOR PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT DATED APAK, (3, 1985.
APPROVAL
‘HS tb TO CERTIFY THAT V-IY OPBRON, ALL LOTS EHONM UPON THRE. SUIDVIEION CONFORM TO 0000 LANO PLANKMG POLICIES
[AND ARE SUTADLE FOR THE PUNPOSES FOR WHIM THEY ARE SUBDIVIDD.
AppRovED Ov. ares
Pram DAEETOR
‘pat if 10 CERTIFY THAT ALL EHOMEERNG COHOITONE AMO REOURCMENTE OF THE CITY CODE NAVE BEEN COMDLIED WIT AND
Duar THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION {5 LOCATED WITH AN ARCA DCZIONATED AS HAVING AM AtSUREO WATER GUPPLY PURSUANT TO
{CTION 49-570, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES.
Arpnoven ov: arts
CY ENOEER
APPROVED BY THE COUNER, OF THE CTY OF EHANOLER, ARITONA TH pay of
ov artes
Taner iy Gene
DEVELOPER ENGINEER
‘Louse ENOMCERN,
‘STaMpARo pactTc, HOMES me
fe4z &, oRanocwood AvEWE
he m SCOTTSDALE ROAD
Scorvionte, ar eszaseeaze
(Bearcat No. 293
Clouse € \ SSeS
cl louse Engineering, Inc. ope
e ENGINEERS © SURVEYORS PATE 02-04-99 sreoves
ett & roomed Am #Piew, Aine GED © TE, 0-00 © FAX DeOABO
0.6, LOO NO; PTS9-O00IS: JOB NO, 970704
GROSS AREA: 140.93 AC. LOTS: 267 TRACTS: _27 SHEET 1 OF 9
COOPER ROAD
COOPER ROAD ELEVATION
“AY STANDARD PACIFIC
HOMES
PECOS ROAD ELEVATION
7 STANDARD PACIFIC
HOMES
FINAL PLAT or — =
FOR ee a r
CANYON OAKS ESTATES £.
, 2. R. Pan ee eas MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA a © il a
KEY MAP.
O “INDICATES SHEET NUMBER
Clouse Enginearing. Inc. 970704
engi ORS SH. 2
NGING =
WA Oregenved Arn sPenla Aires 69OF0 #7. 90-8000 = FAK DHO-4BO OF”