Extracted text (via pymupdf)
76509 characters
Project Name: DETENTION FACILITY STUDY
Page 1
Project No.: PD2302.101
Rev. 11/10/22
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Consultant Services
DETENTION FACILITY STUDY
Project No. PD2302.101
Council Date: April 13, 2023
Item No.
This Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into on the ______ day of_________________, 2023
(“Effective Date”), by and between City of Chandler, an Arizona municipal corporation, ("City''),
and McClaren, Wilson & Lawrie, Inc., an Arizona corporation, ("Consultant") (City and
Consultant may individually be referred to as “Party” and collectively referred to as “Parties”).
RECITALS
A. City proposes to engage Consultant to provide Consultant Services for DETENTION FACILITY
STUDY project as more fully described in Exhibit "A", which is attached to and made a part of
this Agreement by this reference.
B. Consultant is ready, willing, and able to provide the services described in Exhibit “A” for
the compensation and fees set forth and as described in Exhibit ”B”, which is attached to
and made a part of this Agreement by this reference.
C. City desires to enter into an Agreement with Consultant to provide these services under
the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual promises contained in this
Agreement, City and Consultant agree as follows:
SECTION I--CONSULTANT’S SERVICES
Consultant must perform the services described in Exhibit “A” to City’s satisfaction within the
terms and conditions of this Agreement and within the care and skill that a person who
provides similar services in Chandler, Arizona exercises under similar conditions. All work or
services furnished by Consultant under this Agreement must be performed in a skilled and
workmanlike manner. All fixtures, furnishings, and equipment furnished by Consultant as
part of the work or services under this Agreement must be new, or the latest model, and of
the most suitable grade and quality for the intended purpose of the work or service.
Project Name: DETENTION FACILITY STUDY
Page 2
Project No.: PD2302.101
Rev. 11/10/22
SECTION II--PERIOD OF SERVICE
Consultant must perform the services described in Exhibit “A” for the term of this
Agreement. Unless amended in writing by the Parties, the Agreement term expires 334
calendar days after the Notice to Proceed (NTP) Date.
SECTION III--PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION AND FEES
Unless amended in writing by the Parties, Consultant’s compensation and fees as more fully
described in Exhibit “B” for performance of the services approved and accepted by City
under this Agreement must not exceed $195,845 for the full term of the Agreement.
Consultant may not increase any compensation or fees under this Agreement without the
City’s prior written consent. Consultant must submit monthly requests for payment of
services approved and accepted during the previous billing period and must include, as
applicable, detailed invoices and receipts, a narrative description of the tasks accomplished
during the billing period, a list of any deliverables submitted, and any subconsultant’s or
supplier’s actual requests for payment plus similar narrative and listing of their work.
Consultant must submit an Application and Certification for Payment Sheet with the monthly
request for payment to: CapitalProjects.Payables@chandleraz.gov. Payment for those
services negotiated as a lump sum will be made in accordance with the percentage of the
work completed during the preceding billing period. Services negotiated as a not-to-exceed
fee will be paid in accordance with the work effort expended on the service during the
preceding month. All requests for payment must be submitted to City for review and
approval. City will make payment for approved and accepted services within 30 calendar days
of City’s receipt of the request for payment. Consultant bears all responsibility and liability for
any and all tax obligations that result from Consultant’s performance under this Agreement.
SECTION IV--CITY'S OBLIGATIONS
As part of Consultant’s services under this Agreement, City will provide furnished items,
services, or obligations as detailed in Exhibit “D”.
SECTION V--GENERAL CONDITIONS
5.1 Notices. Unless otherwise provided herein, demands under this Agreement must be in
writing and will be deemed to have been duly given and received either (a) on the date of
service if personally served on the party to whom notice is to be given, or (b) on the third day
after the date of the postmark of deposit by first class United States mail, registered or
certified, postage prepaid and properly addressed as follows:
Project Name: DETENTION FACILITY STUDY
Page 3
Project No.: PD2302.101
Rev. 11/10/22
To City:
City of Chandler - Public Works & Utilities Department
Attn: CIP City Engineer: Kimberly Moon, P.E.
P.O. Box 4008, Mail Stop 407
Chandler, AZ 85244-4008
Phone: 480-782-3349
Email: kimberly.moon@chandleraz.gov
With a copy to:
City of Chandler - Public Works & Utilities Department
Attn: Ivan Magana, Project Manager
P.O. Box 4008, Mail Stop 407, Chandler, AZ 85244-4008
Phone: 480-782-3362
Email: ivan.magana@chandleraz.gov
To Consultant:
LEGAL COMPANY NAME: McClaren, Wilson & Lawrie, Inc.
Mailing Address:
8705 N Central Ave., Phoenix, AZ 85020
Physical Address: 8705 N Central Ave., Phoenix, AZ 85020
Statutory Agent Name: David G. Wilson, Sr. Principal
Statutory Agent Mailing Address:
8705 N Central Ave., Phoenix, AZ 85020
Statutory Agent Physical Address: 8705 N Central Ave., Phoenix, AZ 85020
CONSULTANT’S AUTHORIZED PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
David G. Wilson
Title:
Sr. Principal
Phone: (602) 331-4141
Email:
Wilson@mwlarchitects.com
5.2 Records/Audit. Records of Consultant’s direct personnel payroll, reimbursable expenses
pertaining to this Agreement and records of accounts between City and Consultant must be
kept on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles and must be made available to
City and its auditors for up to three years following City’s final acceptance of the services
under this Agreement (this requirement is increased to five years if construction of this
project is federally funded). City, its authorized representative, or any federal agency,
reserves the right to audit Consultant’s records to verify the accuracy and appropriateness of
all cost and pricing data, including data used to negotiate this Agreement and any
amendments. City reserves the right to decrease the total amount of Agreement price or
payments made under this Agreement or request reimbursement from Consultant following
final Agreement payment on this Agreement if, upon audit of Consultant’s records, the audit
discloses Consultant has provided false, misleading, or inaccurate cost and pricing data.
Consultant will include a similar provision in all of its Agreements with subconsultants who
provide services under the Agreement to ensure that City, its authorized representative, or
the appropriate federal agency, has access to the subconsultants’ records to verify the
Project Name: DETENTION FACILITY STUDY
Page 4
Project No.: PD2302.101
Rev. 11/10/22
accuracy of all cost and pricing data. City reserves the right to decrease Agreement price or
payments made on this Agreement or request reimbursement from Consultant following
final payment on this Agreement if the above provision is not included in subconsultant
agreements, and one or more subconsultants refuse to allow City to audit their records to
verify the accuracy and appropriateness of all cost and pricing data. If, following an audit of
this Agreement, the audit discloses Consultant has provided false, misleading, or inaccurate
cost and pricing data, and the cost discrepancies exceed 1% of the total Agreement billings,
Consultant will be liable for reimbursement of the reasonable, actual cost of the audit.
5.3 Alteration in Character of Work. Whenever an alteration in the character of work results
in a substantial change in this Agreement, thereby materially increasing or decreasing the
scope of services, cost of performance, or Project schedule, the work will be performed as
directed by City. However, before any modified work is started, a written amendment must
be approved and executed by City and Consultant. Such amendment must not be effective
until approved by City. Additions to, modifications, or deletions from this Agreement as
provided herein may be made, and the compensation to be paid to Consultant may
accordingly be adjusted by mutual agreement of the Parties. It is distinctly understood and
agreed that no claim for extra services or materials furnished by Consultant will be allowed
by City except as provided herein, nor must Consultant do any work or furnish any materials
not covered by this Agreement unless such work is first authorized in writing. Any such work
or materials furnished by Consultant without prior written authorization will be at
Consultant’s own risk, cost, and expense, and Consultant hereby agrees that without written
authorization Consultant will make no claim for compensation for such work or materials
furnished.
5.4 Termination. City and Consultant hereby agree to the full performance of the covenants
contained herein, except that City reserves the right, at its discretion and without cause, to
terminate or abandon any service provided for in this Agreement, or abandon any portion of
the Project for which services have been performed by Consultant. In the event City abandons
or suspends the services, or any part of the services as provided in this Agreement, City will
notify Consultant in writing and immediately after receiving such notice, Consultant must
discontinue advancing the work specified under this Agreement. Upon such termination,
abandonment, or suspension, Consultant must deliver to City all drawings, plans,
specifications, special provisions, estimates and other work entirely or partially completed,
together with all unused materials supplied by City. Consultant must appraise the work
Consultant has completed and submit Consultant’s appraisal to City for evaluation. City may
inspect Consultant’s work to appraise the work completed. Consultant will receive
compensation in full for services performed to the date of such termination. The fee will be
paid in accordance with Section Ill of this Agreement, and as mutually agreed upon by
Consultant and City. If there is no mutual agreement on payment, the final determination will
be made in accordance with the "Disputes" provision in this Agreement. However, in no event
may the fee exceed the fee set forth in Section Ill of this Agreement nor as amended in
accordance with Section "Alteration in Character of Work." City will make the final payment
within 60 days after Consultant has delivered the last of the partially completed items and
the Parties agree on the final fee. If City is found to have improperly terminated the
Agreement for cause or default, the termination will be converted to a termination for
convenience in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.
Project Name: DETENTION FACILITY STUDY
Page 5
Project No.: PD2302.101
Rev. 11/10/22
5.5 Indemnification. To the extent permitted by law, the Consultant ("lndemnitor") must
indemnify, save and hold harmless City and its officers, officials, agents and employees
("lndemnitee") from any and all claims, actions, liabilities, damages, losses or expenses
(including court costs, attorneys' fees and costs of claim processing, investigation and
litigation) ("Claims") caused or alleged to be caused, in whole or in part, by the wrongful,
negligent or willful acts, or errors or omissions of Consultant or any of its owners, officers,
directors, agents, employees, or subconsultants in connection with this Agreement. This
indemnity includes any claim or amount arising out of or recovered under workers'
compensation law or on account of the failure of Consultant to conform to any federal, state
or local law, statute, ordinance, rule, regulation or court decree. Consultant must indemnify
lndemnitee from and against any and all Claims, except those arising solely from
lndemnitee's own negligent or willful acts or omissions. Consultant is responsible for primary
loss investigation, defense and judgment costs where this indemnification applies. In
consideration of the award of this Agreement, Consultant agrees to waive all rights of
subrogation against lndemnitee for losses arising from or related to this Agreement. The
obligations of Consultant under this provision survive the termination or expiration of this
Agreement.
5.6 Insurance Requirements. Consultant must procure insurance under the terms and
conditions and for the amounts of coverage set forth in Exhibit “C” against claims that may
arise from or relate to performance of the work under this Agreement by Consultant and its
agents, representatives, employees, and subconsultants. Consultant and any subconsultant
must maintain this insurance until all of their obligations have been discharged, including any
warranty periods under this Agreement. These insurance requirements are minimum
requirements for this Agreement and in no way limit the indemnity covenants contained in
this Agreement. City in no way warrants that the minimum limits stated in Exhibit “C” are
sufficient to protect Consultant from liabilities that might arise out of the performance of the
work under this Agreement by Consultant, Consultant’s agents, representatives, employees,
or subconsultants. Consultant is free to purchase such additional insurance as may be
determined necessary.
5.7 Cooperation and Further Documentation. Consultant agrees to provide City such other
duly executed documents as may be reasonably requested by City to implement the intent
of this Agreement.
5.8 Successors and Assigns. City and Consultant each bind itself, its partners, successors,
assigns, and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement and to the partners,
successors, assigns, and legal representatives of such other party in respect to all covenants
of this Agreement. Neither City nor Consultant may assign, sublet, or transfer its interest in
this Agreement without the written consent of the other party. In no event may any
contractual relation be created between any third party and City.
5.9 Disputes. In any dispute arising out of an interpretation of this Agreement or the duties
required not disposed of by agreement between Consultant and City, the final determination
at the administrative level will be made by City Engineer.
Project Name: DETENTION FACILITY STUDY
Page 6
Project No.: PD2302.101
Rev. 11/10/22
5.10 Completeness and Accuracy of Consultant’s Work. Consultant must be responsible for
the completeness and accuracy of Consultant’s services, data, and other work prepared or
compiled under Consultant’s obligation under this Agreement and must correct, at
Consultant’s expense, all willful or negligent errors, omissions, or acts that may be discovered.
Correction of errors disclosed and determined to exist during any construction of the project on
architectural or engineering drawings and specifications must be accomplished by Consultant.
The cost of the design necessary to correct those errors attributable to Consultant and any
damage incurred by City as a result of additional construction costs caused by such engineering
or architectural errors will be chargeable to Consultant and will not be considered a cost of the
Work. The fact that City has accepted or approved Consultant’s work will in no way relieve
Consultant of any of Consultant’s responsibilities.
5.11 Reporting. Written monthly reports, along with updated work schedules, will be made by
Consultant in the format prescribed by City. These reports will be delivered to City per schedule.
When requested by City, Consultant will attend Council meetings and provide finished documents
including correspondence for Council action, supporting charts, graphs, drawings and colored
slides of same.
5.12 Withholding Payment. City reserves the right to withhold funds from Consultant’s
payments up to the amount equal to the claims City may have against Consultant until such
time that a settlement on those claims has been reached.
5.13 City's Right of Cancellation. The Parties acknowledge that this Agreement is subject to
cancellation by City under the provisions of Section 38-511, Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.).
5.14 Independent Consultant. For this Agreement Consultant constitutes an independent
contractor. Any provisions in this Agreement that may appear to give City the right to direct
Consultant as to the details of accomplishing the work or to exercise a measure of control
over the work means that Consultant must follow the wishes of City as to the results of the
work only. These results must comply with all applicable laws and ordinances.
5.15 Project Staffing. Prior to the start of any work under this Agreement, Consultant must
submit to City detailed resumes of key personnel that will be involved in performing services
prescribed in the Agreement. City hereby acknowledges its acceptance of such personnel to
perform services under this Agreement. At any time hereafter that Consultant desires to
change key personnel while performing under the Agreement, Consultant must submit the
qualifications of the new personnel to City for prior approval. Key personnel include, but are
not limited to, principals-in-charge, project manager, and project Consultant. Consultant will
maintain an adequate and competent staff of qualified persons, as may be determined by
City, throughout the performance of this Agreement to ensure acceptable and timely
completion of the Scope of Services. If City objects, with reasonable cause, to any of
Consultant’s staff, Consultant must take prompt corrective action acceptable to City and, if
required, remove such personnel from the Project and replace with new personnel agreed to
by City.
5.16 Consultants or Subconsultants. Prior to beginning the work, Consultant must furnish City
for approval the names of consultants or subconsultants to be used under this Agreement.
Project Name: DETENTION FACILITY STUDY
Page 7
Project No.: PD2302.101
Rev. 11/10/22
Any subsequent changes are subject to City’s written prior approval.
5.17 Force Majeure. If either party is delayed or prevented from the performance of any act
required under this Agreement by reason of acts of God or other cause beyond the control
and without fault of the Party (financial inability excepted), performance of that act may be
excused, but only for the period of the delay, if the Party provides written notice to the other
Party within ten days of such act. The time for performance of the act may be extended for a
period equivalent to the period of delay from the date written notice is received by the other
Party.
5.18 Compliance with Federal Laws. Consultant understands and acknowledges the
applicability of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Immigration Reform and Control Act
of 1986 and the Drug Free Workplace Act of 1989 to it. Consultant agrees to comply with these
laws in performing this Agreement and to permit City to verify such compliance.
5.19 No Israel Boycott. By entering into this Agreement, Consultant certifies that Consultant
is not currently engaged in, and agrees for the duration of the Agreement, not to engage in a
boycott of Israel as defined by state statute.
5.20 Legal Worker Requirements. A.R.S. § 41-4401 prohibits City from awarding an Agreement
to any consultant who fails, or whose subconsultants fail, to comply with A.R.S. § 23-214(A).
Therefore, Consultant agrees Consultant and each subconsultant it uses warrants their
compliance with all federal immigration laws and regulations that relate to their employees
and their compliance with § 23-214, subsection A. A breach of this warranty will be deemed a
material breach of the Agreement and may be subject to penalties up to and including
termination of the Agreement. City retains the legal right to inspect the papers of any
Consultant’s or subconsultant’s employee who provides services under this Agreement to
ensure that Consultant and subconsultants comply with the warranty under this provision.
5.21 Lawful Presence Requirement. A.R.S. §§ 1-501 and 1-502 prohibit City from awarding an
Agreement to any natural person who cannot establish that such person is lawfully present
in the United States. To establish lawful presence, a person must produce qualifying
identification and sign a City-provided affidavit affirming that the identification provided is
genuine. This requirement will be imposed at the time of Agreement award. This requirement
does not apply to business organizations such as corporations, partnerships, or limited
liability companies.
5.22 Covenant Against Contingent Fees. Consultant warrants that no person has been
employed or retained to solicit or secure this Agreement upon an agreement or
understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee, and that no
member of the Chandler City Council, or any City employee has any interest, financially, or
otherwise, in Consultant’s firm. For breach or violation of this warrant, City may annul this
Agreement without liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the Agreement price or
consideration, the full amount of such commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee.
5.23 Non-Waiver Provision. The failure of either Party to enforce any of the provisions of this
Agreement or to require performance of the other Party of any of the provisions hereof must
Project Name: DETENTION FACILITY STUDY
Page 8
Project No.: PD2302.101
Rev. 11/10/22
not be construed to be a waiver of such provisions, nor must it affect the validity of this
Agreement or any part thereof, or the right of either Party to thereafter enforce each and
every provision.
5.24 Disclosure of Information Adverse to City’s Interests. To evaluate and avoid potential
conflicts of interest, Consultant must provide written notice to City, as set forth in this Section,
of any work or services performed by Consultant for third parties that may involve or be
associated with any real property or personal property owned or leased by City. Such notice
must be given 7 business days prior to commencement of the services by Consultant for a
third party, or 7 business days prior to an adverse action as defined below. Written notice
and disclosure must be sent in accordance with Section 6.7 above. An adverse action under
this Agreement includes, but is not limited to: (a) using data as defined in the Agreement
acquired in connection with this Agreement to assist a third party in pursuing administrative
or judicial action against City; or (b) testifying or providing evidence on behalf of any person
in connection with an administrative or judicial action against City; or (c) using data to produce
income for Consultant or its employees independently of performing the services under this
Agreement, without the prior written consent of City. Consultant represents that except for
those persons, entities, and projects identified to City, the services performed by Consultant
under this Agreement are not expected to create an interest with any person, entity, or third
party project that is or may be adverse to City’s interests. Consultant’s failure to provide a
written notice and disclosure of the information as set forth in this Section constitute a
material breach of this Agreement.
5.25 Data Confidentiality and Data Security. As used in the Agreement, "data" means all
information, whether written or verbal, including plans, photographs, studies, investigations,
audits, analyses, samples, reports, calculations, internal memos, meeting minutes, data field
notes, work product, proposals, correspondence and any other similar documents or
information prepared by, obtained by, or transmitted to Consultant or its subconsultants in
the performance of this Agreement. The Parties agree that all data, regardless of form,
including originals, images, and reproductions, prepared by, obtained by, or transmitted to
Consultant or its subconsultants in connection with Consultant’s or its subconsultant’s
performance of this Agreement is confidential and proprietary information belonging to City.
Except as specifically provided in this Agreement, Consultant or its subconsultants must not
divulge data to any third party without City’s prior written consent. Consultant or its
subconsultants must not use the data for any purposes except to perform the services
required under this Agreement. These prohibitions do not apply to the following data
provided to Consultant or its subconsultants have first given the required notice to City: (a)
data which was known to Consultant or its subconsultants prior to its performance under this
Consultant or its subconsultants by a third party, who to the best of Consultant’s or its
subconsultants’ knowledge and belief, had the legal right to make such disclosure and
Consultant or its subconsultants are not otherwise required to hold such data in confidence;
or (c) data which is required to be disclosed by virtue of law, regulation, or court order, to
which Consultant or its subconsultants are subject. In the event Consultant or its
subconsultants are required or requested to disclose data to a third party, or any other
information to which Consultant or its subconsultants became privy as a result of any other
Agreement with City, Consultant must first notify City as set forth in this Section of the request
or demand for the data. Consultant or its subconsultants must give City sufficient facts so
Project Name: DETENTION FACILITY STUDY
Page 9
Project No.: PD2302.101
Rev. 11/10/22
that City can be given an opportunity to first give its consent or take such action that City may
deem appropriate to protect such data or other information from disclosure. All data must
continue to be subject to the confidentiality agreements of this Agreement. Consultant or its
subconsultants assume all liability to maintain the confidentiality of the data in its possession
and agrees to compensate City if any of the provisions of this Section are violated by
Consultant, its employees, agents or subconsultants. Solely for the purposes of seeking
injunctive relief, it is agreed that a breach of this Section must be deemed to cause irreparable
harm that justifies injunctive relief in court. Consultant agrees that the requirements of this
Section must be incorporated into all subagreements entered into by Consultant. A violation
of this Section may result in immediate termination of this Agreement without notice.
5.26 Personal Identifying Information-Data Security. Personal identifying information,
financial account information, or restricted City information, whether electronic format or
hard copy, must be secured and protected at all times by Consultant or its subconsultants. At
a minimum, Consultant or its subconsultants must encrypt or password-protect electronic
files. This includes data saved to laptop computers, computerized devices, or removable
storage devices. When personal identifying information, financial account information, or
restricted City information, regardless of its format, is no longer necessary, the information
must be redacted or destroyed through appropriate and secure methods that ensure the
information cannot be viewed, accessed, or reconstructed. In the event that data collected or
obtained by Consultant or its subconsultants in connection with this Agreement is believed
to have been compromised, Consultant or its subconsultants must immediately notify City
contact. Consultant agrees to reimburse City for any costs incurred by City to investigate
potential breaches of this data and, where applicable, the cost of notifying individuals who
may be impacted by the breach. Consultant agrees that the requirements of this Section must
be incorporated into all subcontracts entered into by Consultant. It is further agreed that a
violation of this Section must be deemed to cause irreparable harm that justifies injunctive
relief in court. A violation of this Section may result in immediate termination of this
Agreement without notice. The obligations of Consultant or its subconsultants under this
Section must survive the termination of this Agreement.
5.27 Jurisdiction and Venue. This Agreement is made under and must be construed in
accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Arizona without regard to the
conflicts or choice of law provisions thereof. Any action to enforce any provision of this
Agreement or to obtain any remedy with respect hereto must be brought in the courts
located in Maricopa County, Arizona, and for this purpose, each Party hereby expressly and
irrevocably consents to the jurisdiction and venue of such court.
5.28 Survival. All warranties, representations, and indemnifications by Consultant must
survive the completion or termination of this Agreement.
5.29 Modification. Except as expressly provided herein to the contrary, no supplement,
modification, or amendment of any term of this Agreement will be deemed binding or
effective unless in writing and signed by the Parties.
5.30 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement or the application to any person or
circumstance may be invalid, illegal or unenforceable to any extent, the remainder of this
Project Name: DETENTION FACILITY STUDY
Page 10
Project No.: PD2302.101
Rev. 11/10/22
Agreement and the application will not be affected and will be enforceable to the fullest
extent permitted by law.
5.31 Integration. This Agreement contains the full agreement of the Parties. Any prior or
contemporaneous written or oral agreement between the Parties regarding the subject
matter is merged and superseded.
5.32 Time is of the Essence. Time of each of the terms, covenants, and conditions of this
Agreement is hereby expressly made of the essence.
5.33 Date of Performance. If the date of performance of any obligation or the last day of any
time period provided for should fall on a Saturday, Sunday, or holiday for City, the obligation
will be due and owing, and the time period will expire, on the first day after which is not a
Saturday, Sunday or legal City holiday. Except as may otherwise be set forth in this
Agreement, any performance provided for herein will be timely made if completed no later
than 5:00 p.m. (Chandler time) on the day of performance.
5.34 Third Party Beneficiary. Nothing under this Agreement will be construed to give any
rights or benefits in the Agreement to anyone other than City and Consultant, and all duties
and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and exclusive
benefit of City and Consultant and not for the benefit of any other party.
5.35 Conflict in Language. All work performed must conform to all applicable City of Chandler
codes, ordinances, and requirements as outlined in this Agreement. If there is a conflict in
interpretation between provisions in this Agreement and those in Exhibit "A", the provisions
in this Agreement prevail.
5.36 Document/Information Release. Documents and materials released to Consultant,
which are identified by City as sensitive and confidential, are City’s property. The
document/material must be issued by and returned to City upon completion of the services
under this Agreement. Consultant secondary distribution, disclosure, copying, or duplication
in any manner is prohibited without City’s prior written approval. The document/material
must be kept secure at all times. This directive applies to all City documents, whether in
photographic, printed, or electronic data format.
5.37 Exhibits. The following exhibits are made a part of this Agreement and are incorporated
by reference:
Exhibit A - Scope of Services / Schedule
Exhibit B - Compensation and Fees
Exhibit C - Insurance Requirements
Exhibit D - Special Conditions
Exhibit E – Federal Requirements (if applicable)
5.38 Special Conditions. As part of the services Consultant provides under this Agreement,
Consultant agrees to comply with and fully perform the special terms and conditions set forth
in Exhibit “D”, which is attached to and made a part of this Agreement.
Project Name: DETENTION FACILITY STUDY
Page 11
Project No.: PD2302.101
Rev. 11/10/22
5.39 Non-Discrimination and Anti-Harassment Laws. Consultant must comply with all
applicable City, state, and federal non-discrimination and anti-harassment laws, rules, and
regulations.
5.40 Licenses and Permits. Beginning with the Effective Date and for the full term of this
Agreement, Consultant must maintain all applicable City, state, and federal licenses and
permits required to fully perform Consultant’s services under this Agreement.
5.41 Warranties. Consultant must furnish a one-year warranty on all work and services
performed under this Agreement. Consultant must furnish, or cause to be furnished, a two-
year warranty on all fixtures, furnishings, and equipment furnished by Consultant,
subconsultants or suppliers under this Agreement. Any defects in design, workmanship, or
materials that do not comply with this Agreement must be corrected by Consultant (including,
but not limited to, all parts and labor) at Consultant’s sole cost and expense. All written
warranties and redlines for as-built conditions must be delivered to City on or before City’s
final acceptance of Consultant’s services under this Agreement.
5.42 Cooperative Purchasing Agreement (S.A.V.E. – Strategic Alliance for Volume
Expenditures). In addition to City of Chandler and with the approval of Consultant, this
Agreement may be extended for use by other municipalities, school districts, and government
agencies of the State. Any such usage by other entities must be in accordance with the
ordinance, charter, or procurement rules and regulations of the respective political entity.
5.43 Budget Approval into Next Fiscal Year. This Agreement will commence on the Effective
Date and continue in full force and effect until it is terminated or expires in accordance with
the provisions of this Agreement. The Parties recognize that the continuation of this
Agreement after the close of the City's fiscal year, which ends on June 30 of each year, is
subject to the City Council's approval of a budget that includes an appropriation for this item
as an expenditure. The City does not represent that this budget item will be actually adopted.
This determination is solely made by the City Council.
5.44 Forced Labor of Ethnic Uyghurs Prohibited. By entering into this Agreement, Contractor
certifies and agrees Contractor does not currently use and will not use for the term of this
Agreement: (i) the forced labor of ethnic Uyghurs in the People's Republic of China; or (ii) any
goods or services produced by the forced labor of ethnic Uyghurs in the People's Republic of
China; or (iii) any contractors, subcontractors or suppliers that use the forced labor or any
goods or services produced by the forced labor of ethnic Uyghurs in the People's Republic of
China.
5.45 License to City for Reasonable Use. With this Agreement, Consultant and its
subconsultants hereby grant a license to City, its agents, employees, and representatives for
an indefinite period of time to reasonably use, make copies, and distribute as appropriate
the Documents, works or deliverables developed or created as a result of the Project and this
Agreement. This license also includes the making of derivative works.
Project Name: DETENTION FACILITY STUDY
Page A-1
Project No.: PD2302.101
Rev. 11/10/22
EXHIBIT “A”
SCOPE OF SERVICES/SCHEDULE
City of Chandler
Holding Facility Needs Assessment
• Scope Document •
Draft Issue Date 02.24.2023
McClaren, Wilson & Lawrie, Inc.
02/24/2023
Architects and Planners in Association with Justice Planners 1
Detention Facility Study PB2303
Exhibit “A”
Scope of Services/Schedule
Project Background
In 2014 the City of Chandler and Gilbert entered into an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) to
establish a partnership between each police department to create a joint holding facility for
arrestees to be processed and held prior to their initial appearance in each municipality’s
respective court. The IGA’s option of extending the partnership was exercised in 2017 for an
additional 3-year term and refreshed again in 2022 allowing for another 3 year term.
This IGA was developed around the use of the existing City of Gilbert’s holding facility and is
referred to as the Gilbert Chandler Unified Holding Facility (GCUHF).
Scope of Work Overview
MWL Architects will have two subconsultants - Justice Planners and RLB cost estimators. MWL
will update their previous facility needs assessment and develop two high level conceptual site
options / test-fit studies for a Chandler only detention facility. One conceptual option will be
for a stand-alone detention facility site, and the second conceptual option will be for an
addition to the existing Chandler municipal court.
Justice Planners is a subconsultant for the project and will evaluate the current GCUHF, seeking
options and efficiencies in operations that can extend the viability of this shared holding facility.
Justice Planners will also evaluate the current holding facility needs and provide projections for
the next 25 years for a potential separate Chandler detention facility, and provide those
findings to MWL
Rider Levett Bucknall is a subconsultant that will provide a conceptual cost estimate for the
stand-alone Chandler detention facility, and the Chandler detention facility addition to the
existing municipal court.
Upon receiving the notice to proceed, MWL will coordinate / confirm meeting dates, based on
the incorporated schedule, with COC, JP, and RLB.
City of Chandler
Holding Facility Needs Assessment
• Scope Document •
Draft Issue Date 02.24.2023
McClaren, Wilson & Lawrie, Inc.
02/24/2023
Architects and Planners in Association with Justice Planners 2
Task #1 Project Initiation/Management
MWL coordination / participation with COC and Justice Planners, and Rider Levett Bucknall
(RLB)
MWL will coordinate project communication with the COC and subconsultants, esp. onsite
meetings, and anticipated virtual meetings (Teams meetings or telephone meetings). MWL will
be copied on Justice Planners correspondence with the COC regarding data collection and
analysis and receive copies of all JP meeting notes/minutes, and task deliverables.
Subconsultant: Justice Planners (JP) Efficiencies / Options Study of the GCUHF, and Chandler
only holding facility needs evaluation
1.1 Project preparation and data collection
Concurrent with task 1.1 JP will be collecting publicly available data to inform the project,
such as crime rate and arrest statistics, population data for both Gilbert and Chandler,
previous analyses, court data, etc. In addition, armed with the knowledge of what
perceived factors drive arrestee numbers, JP will construct and transmit a formal request
for criminal justice data from relevant agencies, principally the Chandler and Gilbert
Police Departments and the Chandler Municipal Courts. In general, JP has found that
individual-level data are needed in order to fully understand past and current arrestee
levels, which will in turn inform JP’s forecast efforts. It is JP’s expectation that critical
answers will come from a combination of the data analysis as well as the qualitative
understanding gained from conversations with the key stakeholders.
2.1 Onsite visit to meet with key stakeholders.
JP will hold initial discussions with appropriate staff and stakeholders who will be involved
throughout the study to confirm Chandler’s goals, priorities, and the task schedule. JP will
coordinate their project tasks and schedule with the overall project schedule developed
by MWL and the COC, including for their facility tours, data collection matters, and
interviews to be conducted by the end of this initial meeting. Prior to this meeting JP team
members will have reviewed previous reports or studies provided that are related to the
agencies impacting the GCUHF. JP will develop a schedule for the agencies, staff and
officials that will need to be interviewed, and a list of necessary data will also be
coordinated with MWL and the COC by the end of this initial meeting. At a minimum, JP
shall conduct interviews with:
•
Chandler Police Department command staff
•
Detention Services Unit staff
City of Chandler
Holding Facility Needs Assessment
• Scope Document •
Draft Issue Date 02.24.2023
McClaren, Wilson & Lawrie, Inc.
02/24/2023
Architects and Planners in Association with Justice Planners 3
•
Appropriate Gilbert Police Department staff
•
Chandler Municipal Court Administration
•
City of Chandler Administration
•
Policy Group Members
JPs first task will be to engage with Chandler Police Department staff to gain a clear
understanding of system processes. In addition, in JPs conversations with other
stakeholders, they hope to invite every possible perspective to help them develop a
knowledge base of how the system should ideally function as well as how the system
actually functions. Of utmost importance, JP needs to learn what the expectations are for
how the system will function in the future.
2.2 Track system workflow – tour; map transactions; statistical analysis
There are two components to this phase. First, in order to gain a clear understanding of
the processes of the GCUHF, a comprehensive tour needs to be taken. JP envisions
capturing the main details of the flow of arrestees within the system, to include all
possible methods of processing and release. JP will need to observe the processing of
arrestees from start to finish in order to provide context for the numerical data we will
analyze. It is hoped that JP observations and conversations during the tour will help
highlight potential system efficiencies that could make future use of the GCUHF more
effective and efficient.
Second, upon receipt of the requested stakeholder data from the detention facility and
the City of Chandler, JP will identify and track the arrestee population and prepare a
statistically informed narrative of the flow of arrestees through the facility as well as the
front-end of the municipal court system. Once the appropriate data is provided, JP will
prepare brief operational descriptions of major decision points to document current
practices as well as potential changes that can be considered. The overall data analysis
will include population growth, demographics, crime rates, arrest rates, remand rates,
case processing times, lengths of detention, and historic data to be able to forecast the
arrestee population annually for the next 25 years. Forecasts will be subdivided by
gender, custody category and other important factors to determine the most appropriate
types of holding separation required, and any specialty holding required for unique
populations.
2.3 Assess custody alternatives/system improvements.
Any evaluation of the GCUHF must include an examination of the current utilization of
alternatives to detention. In our work on similar projects, this runs the gamut from
enhancing use of citations on the street, to expedited release processing at the intake
facility’s front door. The assessment of long-term space needs depends upon a number
City of Chandler
Holding Facility Needs Assessment
• Scope Document •
Draft Issue Date 02.24.2023
McClaren, Wilson & Lawrie, Inc.
02/24/2023
Architects and Planners in Association with Justice Planners 4
of factors, including changes in operational and release/detain philosophies, case
processing needs, administrative practices and policies, changing technological
applications, and changes in arrestee population/demographics and the demand for
services as well as changes in other local government operations, such as law
enforcement activities.
JP will review statutes and rules, previous studies and reports, and other materials related to the
operation of each system component, such as annual and statistical reports. Where possible, we
will leverage the information gained from the (Phase 1) personal interviews with each of the
facility’s key stakeholders as well as what was learned during our tour.
2.4 Arrestee population forecasts
Although time series trends based upon aggregate data (the daily count of arrestees, for
instance) are helpful, they are not fully adequate in terms of developing estimates by
gender, offense, and custody level.
In order to produce statistically valid forecasts, individual level admission, charge, and
release data is needed. In addition to the admission and release data, we will also analyze
available demographic projections, crime rate, arrest rate and court processing data to
develop the historic admission trends that, when coupled with facility processing data,
will drive the 25-year projections.
The comprehensive data collected as part of Task 2 will include elements that can be used
to simulate nationally accepted criteria for determining custody level and risk to public
safety (age, education, employment history, residency, prior criminal history, escape
history, in-custody behavior, and classification). Custody criteria are used to assess how
best the inmate should be housed while in the GCUHF, while the latter will be used to
assess who could possibly be placed in the community with appropriate levels of
supervision and services.
To be clear, once we have collected all the data and produced a comprehensive dataset
for analysis, we will utilize state of the art time series modeling in order to produce our
base forecasts along with any special scenario forecasts. Typically, we produce multiple
forecast models that account for potential changes to booking or stay length patterns,
thereby extending the utility of our study.
Overall, this task will assist Chandler by identifying the range of programmatic and
procedural opportunities available to ensure that existing and future facility beds are used
in the most efficient and effective means consistent with public policy and available
resources.
City of Chandler
Holding Facility Needs Assessment
• Scope Document •
Draft Issue Date 02.24.2023
McClaren, Wilson & Lawrie, Inc.
02/24/2023
Architects and Planners in Association with Justice Planners 5
2.5 Needs Assessment preliminary presentation
Findings of our system analysis will be documented and presented to the city. These will
include evaluations of the workings of the early stages of Chandler’s criminal justice
system and the projected arrestee levels and space needs for the next 25 years.
JP has found that an initial detailed presentation of all our findings is important to the
success of the project. We typically will have a 2-hour (or slightly longer) presentation
that is highly detailed and is frankly not suited for the schedules of elected officials. In JP’s
experience, one of the benefits of this presentation is that we will learn some new piece
of information that may require us to modify one or more aspects of our analysis. After
our modifications and alterations, a final presentation (that is significantly reduced in
scope and length) can subsequently be made to executive decision-makers.
3.1 Future facility space needs
Upon completion of our Phase 2 analysis, depending on the findings, JP will estimate the
future space needed for a replacement facility.
If JP’s Phase 2 efforts point toward the need for Chandler to consider constructing its own
holding facility (a possibility for at least one or more of the anticipated forecast scenarios),
JP will utilize the forecast numbers to recommend a total square footage need (building
gross square footage) for the building. Applicable space standards and requirements will
be applied to the numbers of spaces and number of persons per space to calculate the
total square footage required by component. The estimated number of staff required to
operate these spaces will be determined as well. These will be applied to a status quo
projection as well as alternate projections to determine the impact of system changes on
the daily arrestee population and required spaces.
While this is not a substitute for a full design phase architectural program to define in
detail all facility space needs, it does give a probable preliminary project construction
square footage size range to use for a preliminary order of magnitude construction cost
estimate. The benchmark estimators used will be from JP’s current and past detention
project construction project management.
4.1 Reports and presentations
A draft report for the Needs Assessment will be delivered in a single document suitable
for review and acceptance. JP and the COC will conduct a meeting with involved leaders
and staff to review the entire document. Upon completion of the review meeting, we will
City of Chandler
Holding Facility Needs Assessment
• Scope Document •
Draft Issue Date 02.24.2023
McClaren, Wilson & Lawrie, Inc.
02/24/2023
Architects and Planners in Association with Justice Planners 6
make any agreed upon changes and prepare a final report document. Any formal final
presentations that the City may request will also be coordinated with JP staff.
Report will include: (for both existing and new facilities)
•
recommended capacity with alternative projections,
•
efficient workflows,
•
space needs,
•
Recommended revisions to G-CUHF Detainee operations.
MWL Facility Needs Study Update and Conceptual Options Study
Task #2 Needs Validation
MWL will receive findings information from Justice Planners at their needs assessment
preliminary presentation (Task 2.5) and incorporate this information into an initial
meeting agenda to review and discuss with the COC and Chandler Police and develop a
draft and final update of the previous facility needs assessment. The incorporated
schedule for MWLs scope of work is contingent upon receiving the required JP findings
information as MWL begins this task.
Task #3 Concept option study 1 – stand-alone detention facility site
MWL will develop a high-level conceptual option / test-fit study, that will include a
concept site and floor plan layout, and site massing. MWLs study will utilize existing
available site information provided by the COC.
MWL will meet at the proposed site with COC representatives to understand available
information, and constraints and opportunities. MWL will meet virtually to discuss initial
site adjacencies and circulation. MWL will then develop a draft conceptual option and
meet virtually with the COC to review. MWL will incorporate COC comments and
develop a final draft concept study for COC review and cost estimation by RLB.
Task #4 Concept option study 2 –detention facility addition to existing municipal court
facility
MWL will develop a high-level conceptual option / test-fit study, that will include a
concept site and floor plan layout, and site massing. MWLs study will utilize existing
available site information provided by the COC.
MWL will meet at the proposed existing municipal court site with COC representatives
to understand available information, and constraints and opportunities for the proposed
City of Chandler
Holding Facility Needs Assessment
• Scope Document •
Draft Issue Date 02.24.2023
McClaren, Wilson & Lawrie, Inc.
02/24/2023
Architects and Planners in Association with Justice Planners 7
detention facility addition. It is anticipated that the detention facility addition will
require some demolition of existing spaces as well. MWL will meet virtually to discuss
initial site and building adjacencies and circulation. MWL will then develop a draft
conceptual option and meet virtually with the COC to review. MWL will incorporate
COC comments and develop a final draft concept study for COC review and cost
estimation by RLB.
Note: if this initial conceptual option is the preferred option, MWL has provided an
additional allowance to the fee proposal for conceptual evaluation of the existing
mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and special systems, and modifications and additions
required for the new detention facility addition.
Task #5 Conceptual Cost Estimate Review
MWL will provide RLB with the updated facility needs assessment, and a final draft of
the two conceptual site/facility options for review and meet with them virtually to
answer any questions they may have. MWL and the COC will then review the draft
conceptual cost estimate with RLB, allowing them to complete their scope of work.
Task #6 Documentation and Presentation
MWL will finalize the documentation of the conceptual design options and develop an
executive summary. MWL will then compile all deliverables (MW, JP, RLB) into a final
draft document and forward to the COC electronically.
MWL will present the final draft document conclusions to the COC and incorporate any
final comments into the final document and issue electronically.
RLB Conceptual cost Estimate (See subconsultant fee in Table B-1)
RLB will prepare 2 high-level program/concept construction cost estimates. For a stand-
alone detention facility site, and for a detention facility addition to the existing Chandler
Municipal Court. It is anticipated that the detention addition option will require some
demolition and reworking of the existing facility at/around the location of the addition,
as well as modifications to existing site improvements.
It is anticipated that RLBs scope of work will not require travel, and meetings will be
virtual. As this is a conceptual estimate detailed labor, material and equipment build-
ups for unit rates is not applicable.
City of Chandler
Holding Facility Needs Assessment
• Scope Document •
Draft Issue Date 02.24.2023
McClaren, Wilson & Lawrie, Inc.
02/24/2023
Architects and Planners in Association with Justice Planners 8
MWL Final report deliverables
• Report from Justice planners
• RLB Conceptual cost estimate
• Needs assessment narrative.
• Adjacency diagrams
• Square foot program requirements spreadsheet
• Executive summary with conclusions
• 2 facility analysis concepts (existing courts site, and alternate site TBD)
Considerations:
• The TBD site: An allowance has been provided for a TBD site by the consultants,
however MWL’s concept development for either site only responds to information we
have received from the city, and if further site evaluation is required, or if a specific site
is chosen, that site information will need to be provided from the city so that MWL and
its consultants can provide an allowance. Currently an ideal site concept, an MEPSS
narrative and a preliminary SF cost assessment of construction of the facility is within
the scope of the TBD site.
Project Name: DETENTION FACILITY STUDY
Page B-1
Project No.: PD2302.101
Rev. 11/10/22
EXHIBIT “B”
COMPENSATION AND FEES
City of Chandler Detention Center
MWL Project Tasks
Task #1 Project Initiation / Management
• Coordination with COC Stakeholders and Justice planners
• Evaluation of existing information and previous reports
• Dev. work plan, schedule, coordinate w/ Justice Planners
• Tour of Gilbert-Chandler Detention Facility; Debrief meeting; Photos & Notes doc.
• Virtual meeting with COC Courts to confirm program feasability in relation to existing
courts building and site
• Virtual preliminary findings meeting with COC, Justice Planners; mtg notes
• Virtual Justice Planners final present.; receive/review final draft doc
Task #2 Needs Validation; Incorp. Justice Planners Findings
• Eval. impact of Justice Planners Oper. Study on prev. MWL Feasibility Study
• Prep; participate in virtual Chandler PD stakeholder meeting; mtg notets
• Update space needs, adjacency diagrams, concepts
• Issue draft space needs update to COC for review; Virtual review meeting
• Make final changes and issue space needs update document
Task #3 Concept Design for Stand-alone Facility and Site
•Review existing documents/drawings and tour site (no building); photos; notes/markup
• Incorporate markups and create a base site and building sheet
• Develop concept and potential options for review by COC (building, siting, access)
• Virtual concept options review meeting; notes
• Develop selected draft concept option
• Virtual draft concept review meeting
• Develop final concept design & narrative, and forward to COC; forward to RLB
Task #4 Concept Design for Chandler Municipal Court Renov./Addition
• Review existing documents/drawings and tour site and building; photos; notes/marku
• Incorporate markups and create a base site and building sheet
• Develop concept and potential options for review by COC
• Virtual concept options review meeting; notes
• Develop selected draft concept option
• Virtual draft concept review meeting; comments; notes
• Develop final concept design & narrative, and forward to COC; forward to RLB
Task # 5 Budget Estimate Review - w/ RLB; w/ COC and RLB
• Review budget estimate with RLB, suggest any adjustments for RLB, reissue
• MWL & RLB present/rev. estimate w/ COC stakeholders; comments/adjustments for R
Task # 6 Documentation and Presentation
• Develop executive summary
Exhibit B-1
Total Fees by Task
3,150
$
2,055
$
2,740
$
2,330
$
2,330
$
1,165
$
2,330
$
16,100
$
1,440
$
2,125
$
2,465
$
1,165
$
1,425
$
8,620
$
2,330
$
1,755
$
4,610
$
1,370
$
3,650
$
1,165
$
2,990
$
17,870
$
3,700
$
3,100
$
4,610
$
1,370
$
4,060
$
1,370
$
4,750
$
22,960
$
1,165
$
1,645
$
2,810
$
1,920
$
City of Chandler Detention Center
• Compile, forward final draft to COC, w/Justice Planners Oper Study, & RLB Estimate
• Present Needs Update (ppt), Concept Designs - stand-alone site; Court Addition
• Receive and incorporate any comments; issue as final document
Consultant Fees
Justice Planners
RLB - Preparation of high-level Program/Concept construction cost
estimates to support the facility needs assessment – 80-hours x $155/hour,
$12,400
Architectural fees
Owners Allowance
Engineering Allowance (MEPSS and Civil) (for existing courts site and TBD sit
Exhibit B-1
1,700
$
2,330
$
1,495
$
7,445
$
75,805
$
59,940
$
12,400
$
75,805
$
20,000
$
27,700
$
195,845
$
195,845
$
Total Project Fee
Total Architectural Fee
City of Chandler Detention Center
Senior Principal -
Dave Wilson
Project Manager
Erik Hanna
Project
Coordinator
Fernando Salazar
Total
Hours by
Task
MWL Project Tasks
Hours
$275
Hours
$205
Hours
$165
Task #1 Project Initiation / Management
• Coordination with COC Stakeholders and Justice planners
4
10
0
14
• Evaluation of existing information and previous reports
3
6
0
9
• Dev. work plan, schedule, coordinate w/ Justice Planners
4
8
0
12
• Tour of Gilbert-Chandler Detention Facility; Debrief meeting; Photos & Notes doc.
4
6
0
10
• Virtual meeting with COC Courts to confirm program feasability in relation to existing
courts building and site
4
6
0
10
• Virtual preliminary findings meeting with COC, Justice Planners; mtg notes
2
3
0
5
• Virtual Justice Planners final present.; receive/review final draft doc
4
6
0
10
25
45
0
70
Task #2 Needs Validation; Incorp. Justice Planners Findings
• Eval. impact of Justice Planners Oper. Study on prev. MWL Feasibility Study
3
3
0
6
• Prep; participate in virtual Chandler PD stakeholder meeting; mtg notets
4
5
0
9
• Update space needs, adjacency diagrams, concepts
3
8
0
11
• Issue draft space needs update to COC for review; Virtual review meeting
2
3
0
5
• Make final changes and issue space needs update document
1
4
2
7
13
23
2
38
Task #3 Concept Design for Stand-alone Facility and Site
•Review existing documents/drawings and tour site (no building); photos; notes/markup
4
6
0
10
• Incorporate markups and create a base site and building sheet
1
4
4
9
• Develop concept and potential options for review by COC (building, siting, access)
6
8
8
22
• Virtual concept options review meeting; notes
2
4
0
6
• Develop selected draft concept option
4
6
8
18
• Virtual draft concept review meeting
2
3
0
5
• Develop final concept design & narrative, and forward to COC; forward to RLB
4
6
4
14
23
37
24
84
Task #4 Concept Design for Chandler Municipal Court Renov./Addition
• Review existing documents/drawings and tour site and building; photos; notes/markup
6
10
0
16
• Incorporate markups and create a base site and building sheet
2
6
8
16
• Develop concept and potential options for review by COC
6
8
8
22
• Virtual concept options review meeting; notes
2
4
0
6
• Develop selected draft concept option
4
8
8
20
• Virtual draft concept review meeting; comments; notes
2
4
0
6
Exhibit B-2
City of Chandler Detention Center
• Develop final concept design & narrative, and forward to COC; forward to RLB
8
6
8
22
30
46
32
108
Task # 5 Budget Estimate Review - w/ RLB; w/ COC and RLB
• Review budget estimate with RLB, suggest any adjustments for RLB, reissue
2
3
0
5
• MWL & RLB present/rev. estimate w/ COC stakeholders; comments/adjustments for R
3
4
0
7
5
7
0
12
Task # 6 Documentation and Presentation
• Develop executive summary
4
4
0
8
• Compile, forward final draft to COC, w/Justice Planners Oper Study, & RLB Estimate
2
4
2
8
• Present Needs Update (ppt), Concept Designs - stand-alone site; Court Addition
4
6
0
10
• Receive and incorporate any comments; issue as final document
2
3
2
7
12
17
4
33
Total Hours
345
Exhibit B-2
Project Name: DETENTION FACILITY STUDY
Page C-1
Project No.: PD2302.101
Rev. 11/10/22
EXHIBIT “C”
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
1.
General.
1.1 At the same time as execution of this Agreement, Consultant must furnish City a certificate
of insurance on a standard insurance industry ACORD form. The ACORD form must be
issued by an insurance company authorized to transact business in the State of Arizona
possessing a current A.M. Best, Inc. rating of A-7, or better and legally authorized to do
business in the State of Arizona with policies and forms satisfactory to City. Provided,
however, the A.M. Best rating requirement will not be deemed to apply to required Workers’
Compensation coverage.
1.2 Consultant and any of its subconsultants must procure and maintain, until all of their
obligations have been discharged, including any warranty periods under this Agreement are
satisfied, the insurances set forth below.
1.3 The insurance requirements set forth below are minimum requirements for this Agreement
and in no way limit the indemnity covenants contained in this Agreement.
1.4 City in no way warrants that the minimum insurance limits contained in this Agreement are
sufficient to protect Consultant from liabilities that might arise out of the performance of
the Agreement services under this Agreement by Consultant, its agents, representatives,
employees, subconsultants, and Consultant is free to purchase any additional insurance as
may be determined necessary.
1.5 Failure to demand evidence of full compliance with the insurance requirements in this
Agreement or failure to identify any insurance deficiency will not relieve Consultant from,
nor will it be considered a waiver of its obligation to maintain the required insurance at all
times during the performance of this Agreement.
1.6 Use of subconsultants: If any work is subcontracted in any way, Consultant must execute a
written Agreement with subconsultant containing the same Indemnification Clause and
Insurance Requirements as City requires of Consultant in this Agreement. Consultant is
responsible for executing the Agreement with the subconsultant and obtaining Certificates
of Insurance and verifying the insurance requirements.
2.
Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance. Consultant must provide coverage with limits of
liability not less than those stated below.
2.1 Professional Liability. If the Agreement is the subject of any professional services or work
performed by Consultant, or if Consultant engages in any professional services or work
adjunct or residual to performing the work under this Agreement, Consultant must maintain
Professional Liability insurance covering errors and omissions arising out of the work or
services performed by Consultant, or anyone employed by Consultant, or anyone whose
acts, mistakes, errors and omissions Consultant is legally liable, with a liability limit of
$1,000,000 each claim and $2,000,000 all claims. In the event the Professional Liability
insurance policy is written on a “claims made” basis, coverage must extend for 3 years past
Project Name: DETENTION FACILITY STUDY
Page C-2
Project No.: PD2302.101
Rev. 11/10/22
completion and acceptance of the work or services, and Consultant, or its selected Design
Professional will submit Certificates of Insurance as evidence the required coverage is in
effect. The Design Professional must annually submit Certificates of Insurance citing that the
applicable coverage is in force and contains the required provisions for a 3 year period.
2.2 Commercial General Liability-Occurrence Form. Consultant must maintain “occurrence” form
Commercial General Liability insurance with a limit of not less than $2,000,000 for each
occurrence, $4,000,000 aggregate. Said insurance must also include coverage for products
and completed operations, independent contractors, personal injury and advertising injury.
If any Excess insurance is utilized to fulfill the requirements of this paragraph, the Excess
insurance must be “follow form” equal or broader in coverage scope than underlying
insurance.
2.3 Automobile Liability-Any Auto or Owned, Hired and Non-Owned Vehicles
Vehicle Liability: Consultant must maintain Business/Automobile Liability insurance with a
limit of $1,000,000 each accident on Consultant owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles
assigned to or used in the performance of Consultant’s work or services under this
Agreement. If any Excess or Umbrella insurance is utilized to fulfill the requirements of this
paragraph, the Excess or Umbrella insurance must be “follow form” equal or broader in
coverage scope than underlying insurance.
2.4 Workers Compensation and Employers Liability Insurance: Consultant must maintain Workers
Compensation insurance to cover obligations imposed by federal and state statutes having
jurisdiction of Consultant employees engaged in the performance of work or services under
this Agreement and must also maintain Employers’ Liability insurance of not less than
$1,000,000 for each accident and $1,000,000 disease for each employee.
3.
Additional Policy Provisions Required.
3.1 Self-Insured Retentions or Deductibles. Any self-insured retentions and deductibles must be
declared and approved by City. If not approved, City may require that the insurer reduce or
eliminate any deductible or self-insured retentions with respect to City, its officers, officials,
agents, employees, and volunteers.
3.1.1. Consultant’s insurance must contain broad form contractual liability coverage.
3.1.2. Consultant’s insurance coverage must be primary insurance with respect to City, its
officers, officials, agents, and employees. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained
by City, its officers, officials, agents, and employees will be in excess of the coverage
provided by Consultant and must not contribute to it.
3.1.3. Consultant’s insurance must apply separately to each insured against whom claim is
made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
3.1.4. Coverage provided by Consultant must not be limited to the liability assumed under
the indemnification provisions of this Agreement.
Project Name: DETENTION FACILITY STUDY
Page C-3
Project No.: PD2302.101
Rev. 11/10/22
3.1.5. The policies must contain a severability of interest clause and waiver of subrogation
against City, its officers, officials, agents, and employees, for losses arising from Work
performed by Consultant for City. (Does not apply to Professional Liability coverage.)
3.1.6. Consultant, its successors and or assigns, are required to maintain Commercial
General Liability insurance as specified in this Agreement for a minimum period of 3
years following completion and acceptance of the Work. Consultant must submit a
Certificate of Insurance evidencing Commercial General Liability insurance during this
3-year period containing all the Agreement insurance requirements, including
naming City of Chandler, its agents, representatives, officers, directors, officials and
employees as Additional Insured as required.
3.1.7. If a Certificate of Insurance is submitted as verification of coverage, City will
reasonably rely upon the Certificate of Insurance as evidence of coverage, but this
acceptance and reliance will not waive or alter in any way the insurance requirements
or obligations of this Agreement.
3.2. Insurance Cancellation During Term of Agreement.
3.2.1. If any of the required policies expire during the life of this Agreement, Consultant
must forward renewal or replacement Certificates to City within 10 days after the
renewal date containing all the required insurance provisions.
3.2.2. Each insurance policy required by the insurance provisions of this Agreement must
provide the required coverage and must not be suspended, voided or canceled
except after thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to City, except when
cancellation is for non-payment of premium, then ten (10) days prior notice may be
given. Such notice must be sent directly to Chandler Law-Risk Management
Department, Post Office Box 4008, Mailstop 628, Chandler, Arizona 85225. If any
insurance company refuses to provide the required notice, Consultant or its
insurance broker must notify City of any cancellation, suspension, non-renewal of any
insurance within seven (7) days of receipt of insurers’ notification to that effect.
3.3
City as Additional Insured. The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following
provisions:
3.3.1. The Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability policies are to contain, or
be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: City, its officers, officials, agents,
and employees are additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of activities
performed by, or on behalf of, Consultant; Products and Completed operations of
Consultant; and automobiles owned, leased, hired, or borrowed by Consultant.
3.3.2. City, its officers, officials, agents, and employees must be additional insureds to the
full limits of liability purchased by Consultant even if those limits of liability are in
excess of those required by this Agreement.
Project Name: DETENTION FACILITY STUDY
Page AFF-1
Project No.: PD2302.101
Rev. 11/10/22
EXHIBIT “D”
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Standard Details and Specifications. Consultant must be familiar with City’s latest revision of
the MAG Specifications and MAG Standard Details as amended by City. City’s current
amendment to the MAG Specifications, part of City’s Unified Development Manual, may be found
and downloaded from City’s website at http://www.chandleraz.gov/udm.
City Ownership of Project Documents. All work products (electronically or manually
generated) including, but not limited to: plans, specifications, cost estimates, field notes,
tracings, studies, investigations, design analyses, original drawings, original mylars, Computer
Aided Drafting and Design (CADD) file diskettes which reflect all final drawings, and other
related documents which are prepared in the performance of this Agreement (collectively
referred to as "Documents") are to be and remain the property of City and are to be delivered
to the Project Manager before the final payment is made to Consultant. In the event these
Documents are altered, modified or adapted without the written consent of Consultant,
which consent Consultant must not unreasonably withhold, City agrees to hold Consultant
harmless to the extent permitted by law from the legal liability arising out of City's alteration,
modification or adaptation of the Documents.
Re-use of Documents. The parties agree the documents, drawings, specifications and designs,
although the property of City, are prepared for this specific project and are not intended nor
represented by Consultant to be suitable for re-use for any other project. Any re-use without
written verification or adaptation by Consultant for the specific purpose intended will be at
City’s sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to Consultant.
Documents to Bear Seal. Consultant and its subconsultants must endorse by professional
seal all plans, works, and deliverables prepared by each for this Agreement as required by
state law.