DMP2023001 Z2023039 BOS REPORT_PART5.PDF

June 23, 2023 
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR 
WEST THIRTY SIX 
Rl-6 RUPD, SINGLE FAMILY ZONING PARCEL 
That part of Section 36, Township 5 North, Range 6 East, of the Gila and Salt River Meridian, 
Maricopa County, Arizona, more particularly described as follows: 
Commencing at the Aluminum Cap marking the Northeast Comer of said Section 36, from 
which the Brass Cap flush marking the North Quarter Comer of said Section 36 bears South 
89°42'41" West, a distance of 2638.99 feet; 
Thence South 89°42'41" West, along the North line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 36, a 
distance of 825 .15 feet; 
Thence South 00°09'27" East, a distance of 100.00 feet to the Point of Beginning, hereinafter 
referred to as Point A; 
Thence continuing South 00°09'27" East, a distance of 5181.46 feet to the Southwest Comer of 
Tonto Verde Unit Three as recorded in Book 386 of Maps, Page 28, records of Maricopa 
County, Arizona, being a point on the South line of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 36, said 
point hereinafter referred to as Point B; 
Thence South 89°42'13" West, along said South line, a distance of 1816.54 feet to the Brass Cap 
flush marking the South Quarter Comer of said Section 36; 
Thence South 89°41'14" West, along the South line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 36, 
a distance of 1867 .28 feet; 
Thence North 38°19'01" West, departing said South line, a distance of 599.77 feet to the 
beginning of a tangent curve of 186.48 foot radius, concave Easterly; 
Thence Northerly, along said curve, through a central angle of 76°27'00", a distance of 248.82 
feet; 
Thence North 38°07'59" East, a distance of 262.39 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve of 
386.48 foot radius, concave Westerly; 
Thence Northerly, along said curve, through a central angle of 64 °24'42", a distance of 434.48 
feet; 
Thence North 26°16'43" West, a distance of 615.09 feet to a point on a 1332.40 foot radius non­
tangent curve, whose center bears North 63°45'14" East; 
N:\01\0359101\Admin\Legal Descriptions\G-LG-ZONING-SF.docx 
Page 1 of 3 
4550 NORTH 12TH STREET PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85014-4291 {602) 264-6831 FAX {602) 264-0928 
CVL 
CONSULTANTS 
Exhibit O

Thence North, along said curve, through a central angle of 26 °09'44", a distance of 608.40 feet; 
Thence North 00 °06'20" West, a distance of 181.82 feet; 
Thence North 00 °05'41" West, a distance of 2270.13 feet; 
Thence North 89 °40'44" East, a distance of 325.00 feet; 
Thence North 00 °05'41" West, a distance of 270.00 feet to a point on a line which is parallel with 
and 100.00 feet Southerly from the North line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 36 ; 
Thence North 89 °40'44" East, along said parallel line, a distance of 2112.57 feet to a point on a 
line which is parallel with and 100.00 feet Southerly from the North line of the Northeast 
Quarter; 
Thence North 89 °42'41" East, along said parallel line, a distance of 1813.90 feet to the Point of 
Beginning. 
Except therefrom: 
Commencing at the aforementioned Point A; 
Thence South 54 °02'36" West, a distance of 2572.54 feet to the Point of Beginning and from 
which the aforementioned Point B bears South 29 °43'58" East, a distance of 4227.46 feet; 
Thence South 24 °18'25" East, a distance of 414.00 feet; 
Thence South 10 °29'46" East, a distance of 353.38 feet; 
Thence South 82 °55'44" West, a distance of 105.41 feet; 
Thence South 06 °42'45" East, a distance of 122.93 feet; 
Thence South 67 °50'38" West, a distance of 243.29 feet; 
Thence South 22 °09'22" East, a distance of 189.96 feet; 
Thence South 39 °25'36" West, a distance of 63.38 feet; 
Thence North 68 °33'58" West, a distance of 265.46 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve of 
550.00 foot radius, concave Northeasterly; 
Thence Northwesterly, along said curve, through a central angle of 89 °19'50", a distance of 
857.51 feet; 
Thence North 20 °45'52" East, a distance of 349.99 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve of 
700.00 foot radius, concave Westerly; 
Thence Northerly, along said curve, through a central angle of05 °47'40", a distance of 70.79 
feet; 
N:\01\0359101\Admin\Legal Descriptions\G-LG-ZONING-SF.docx 
Page 2 of3 
CVL 
4550 NORTH 12TH STREET PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85014-4291 {602) 264-6831 FAX {602) 264-0928 
CONSULTANTS

Thence South 87°16'28" East, a distance of 464.51 feet to the Point of Beginning. 
Containing 20,579,734 Square Feet or 472.446 Acres, more or less. 
N:\0 l \0359101 \Admin\Legal Descriptions\G-LG-ZONING-SF.docx 
Page 3 of3 
4550 NORTH 12TH STREET PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85014-4291 (602) 264-6831 FAX (602) 264-0928 
CVL 
CONSULTANTS

WEST THIRTY SIX 
Rl-6 RUPD, SINGLE FAMILY PARCEL 
S89°42'40.70" W 825.15 
S00°09'27.44" E 100.00 
BOUNDARY 
S00°09'27.44" E 5181.46 
S89°42'12.66" W 1816.54 
S89°41'13.71" W 1867.28 
N38°19'01.29" W 599.77 
RB = N51°40'58.71" E 
R = 186.48 
A = 248.82 
C = 230.77 
CB = N00°05'31.29" W 
D = 76°26'60.00" 
T = 146.88 
RB = N5l052'01.29" W 
N38°07'58.71" E 262.39 
RB = N5 l 052'01.29" W 
R = 386.48 
A = 434.48 
C = 411.96 
CB = N05°55'37.71" E 
D = 64°24'42.00" 
T = 243.43 
RB = N63°43'16.71" E 
N26°16'43.29" W 615.09 
RB = N63°45'13.88" E 
R = 1332.40 
A = 608.40 
C = 603.12 
CB = Nl3°09'54.10" W 
D = 26°09'44.03" 
T = 309.60 
RB = S89°54'57.91" W 
N00°06'20.22" W 181.82 
N00°05'41.03" W 2270.13 
N89°40'44.29" E 325.00 
N00°05'41.03" W 270.00 
N89°40'44.28" E 2112.57 
N89°42'40.70" E 1813.90 
to 
Area = 21322759 
489.503 AC 
Closing course: 69°28'34.80" 0.007933 
Misclosure: 1/1,000,000+ 
North Error: 0.002781 
East Error: 0.007430

WEST THIRTY SIX 
Rl-6 RUPD, SINGLE FAMILY PARCEL 
EXCEPTION 
S54°02'35.71" W 2572.54 
BOUNDARY 
S24°18'24.8526" E 414.00 
Sl0°29'46.0453" E 353.38 
S82°55'43.6733" W 105.41 
S06°42'45.0021" E 122.93 
S67°50'37.7437" W 243.29 
S22°09'22.2563" E 189.96 
S39°25'35.983 l" W 63.38 
N68°33'57.7393" W 265.46 
RB = N2 l 
026'02.2607" E 
R = 550.00 
A = 857.51 
C = 773.26 
CB = N23°54'02.6610" W 
D = 89°19'50.1567" 
T = 543.61 
RB = N69°14'07.5826" W 
N20°45'52.4174" E 349.99 
RB = N69°14'07.5826" W 
R = 700.00 
A = 70.79 
C = 70.76 
CB = Nl 7°52'02.3407" E 
D = 05°47'40.1535" 
T = 35.43 
RB = S75°01'47.7361" E 
S87°16'28.2731" E 464.51 
Area = 743025 
17.058 AC 
Closing course: 89°16'53.0007" 0.004760 
Misclosure: 1/717,787 
North Error: 0.000060 
East Error: 0.004759

N:\01\0359101\CADD\Exhibits\VX.ZONING.dwg   Dominique   June 23, 2023
OF
1
2
WEST THIRTY-SIX
4550 North 12th Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85014
Phone 602-264-6831
http://www.cvlci.com
SCALE 1" = 1000'
EXHIBIT
JOMAX ROAD ALIGNMENT
176TH STREET
RIO VERDE DRIVE
ZONING PARCEL
R1-6 RUPD, SINGLE FAMILY

LINE TABLE
NO.
BEARING
LENGTH
LINE TABLE
NO.
BEARING
LENGTH
CURVE TABLE
NO.
LENGTH
RADIUS
DELTA
TANGENT
CHORD
CHORD-BEARING
N:\01\0359101\CADD\Exhibits\VX.ZONING.dwg   Dominique   June 23, 2023
OF
2
2
WEST THIRTY-SIX
4550 North 12th Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85014
Phone 602-264-6831
http://www.cvlci.com
NO SCALE
EXHIBIT
ZONING PARCEL
R1-6 RUPD, SINGLE FAMILY

June 23, 2023 
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR 
WEST THIRTY SIX 
C-2, COMMERCIAL ZONING PARCEL
That part of Section 36, Township 5 North, Range 6 East, of the Gila and Salt River Meridian, 
Maricopa County, Arizona, more particularly described as follows: 
Commencing at the Aluminum Cap marking the Northeast Comer of said Section 36, from 
which the Brass Cap flush marking the North Quarter Comer of said Section 36 bears South 
89°42'41" West, a distance of 2638.99 feet; 
Thence North 60°57'07" East, a distance of 3325.54 feet to the Point of Beginning from which 
the Southwest Comer of Tonto Verde Unit Three as recorded in Book 386 of Maps, Page 28, 
records of Maricopa County, Arizona, being a point on the South line of the Southeast Quarter of 
said Section 36, bears South 29°43'58" East, a distance of 4227.46 feet; 
Thence South 24°18'25" East, a distance of 414.00 feet; 
Thence South 10°29'46" East, a distance of 353.38 feet; 
Thence South 82°55'44" West, a distance of 105.41 feet; 
Thence South 06°42'45" East, a distance of 122.93 feet; 
Thence South 67°50'38" West, a distance of 243.29 feet; 
Thence South 22°09'22" East, a distance of 189.96 feet; 
Thence South 39°25'36" West, a distance of 63.38 feet; 
Thence North 68°33'58" West, a distance of 265.46 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve of 
550.00 foot radius, concave Northeasterly; 
Thence Northwesterly, along said curve, through a central angle of 89°19'50", a distance of 
857.51 feet; 
Thence North 20°45'52" East, a distance of 349.99 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve of 
700.00 foot radius, concave Westerly; 
Thence Northerly, along said curve, through a central angle of 05°47'40", a distance of 70.79 
feet; 
Thence South 87°16'28" East, a distance of 464.51 feet to the Point of Beginning. 
Containing 743,025 Square Feet or 17.058 Acres, more or less. 
N:\0 l \0359101 \Admin\Legal Descriptions\G-LG-ZONING-COMM.docx 
Page 1 ofl 
CVL 
4550 NORTH 12TH STREET PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85014-4291 (602) 264-6831 FAX (602) 264-0928 
CONSULTANTS 
Exhibit P

WEST THIRTY SIX 
C-2 COMMERCIAL PARCEL
N60°57'07.41" E 3325.54 
BOUNDARY 
S24°18'24.85" E 414.00 
Sl0°29'46.05" E 353.38 
S82°55'43.67" W 105.41 
S06°42'45.00" E 122.93 
S67°50'37.74" W 243.29 
S22°09'22.26" E 189.96 
S39°25'35.98" W 63.38 
N68°33'57.74" W 265.46 
RB = N21 °26'02.26" E 
R = 550.00 
A = 857.51 
C = 773.26 
CB = N23°54'02.66" W 
D = 89°19'50.16" 
T = 543.61 
RB = N69°14'07.58" W 
N20°45'52.42" E 349.99 
RB = N69°14'07.58" W 
R = 700.00 
A = 70.79 
C = 70.76 
CB = NI 7°52'02.34" E 
D = 05°47'40.15" 
T = 35.43 
RB = S75°01'47.74" E 
S87°16'28.27" E 464.51 
to 
Area = 743025 
17.058 AC 
Closing course: 89°16'53.00" 0.004760 
Misclosure: 1/717,787 
North Error: 0.000060 
East Error: 0.004759

N:\01\0359101\CADD\Exhibits\VX.EXCEPTION.dwg   Dominique   June 23, 2023
OF
1
2
WEST THIRTY-SIX
4550 North 12th Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85014
Phone 602-264-6831
http://www.cvlci.com
SCALE 1" = 1000'
EXHIBIT
JOMAX ROAD ALIGNMENT
176TH STREET
RIO VERDE DRIVE
ZONING PARCEL
C-2, COMMERCIAL

LINE TABLE
NO.
BEARING
LENGTH
CURVE TABLE
NO.
LENGTH
RADIUS
DELTA
TANGENT
CHORD
CHORD-BEARING
N:\01\0359101\CADD\Exhibits\VX.EXCEPTION.dwg   Dominique   June 23, 2023
OF
2
2
WEST THIRTY-SIX
4550 North 12th Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85014
Phone 602-264-6831
http://www.cvlci.com
NO SCALE
EXHIBIT
ZONING PARCEL
C-2, COMMERCIAL

Page | 1  
 
 
Subdivision 
Infrastructure  
& Planning Program 
301 W. Jefferson St. 
Phoenix, AZ 85003 
 
Subdi vi sio n@mari co pa.go v 
esd.mar i co pa.go v 
 
 
 
 
 
The Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MCESD) has completed review 
for the  WEST THIRTY-SIX planning case(s). Please note the following MCESD requirements 
for site development: 
Subdivision and Infrastructure –  
An Approval to Construct application is required and must be submitted to MCESD’s 
Subdivision & Infrastructure Program for water, reclaimed water and/or wastewater system 
infrastructure. 
 
A will serve letter issued by the Utility is required and must be submitted to MCESD’s 
Subdivision & Infrastructure Program if the site/development will be provided with water 
and/or reclaimed water by a Utility.  A capacity assurance letter issued by the Utility is 
required to MCESD’s Subdivision & Infrastructure Program if the site/development 
wastewater service is being provided by a Utility. 
 
An Approval of Sanitary Facilities (Subdivision) application is required to the MCESD’s 
Subdivision & Infrastructure Program for Subdivisions with Single Family Residences and 
for Condominiums/Town Homes.  
 
A concept review will be required to determine site feasibility for Environmental Services 
related permits. Prior to moving case forward, the findings of the review will be provided to 
the planner assigned to the case with Planning and Development for staff review and 
recommendation. 
• 
The applicant will be required to submit a master plan review for water and 
wastewater infrastructure along with $500 fee for each to the MCESD’s Subdivision 
& Infrastructure Program. 
 
For subdivision related questions, please contact the Subdivision and Infrastructure 
Program at (602) 506-1058 or email subdivision@maricopa.gov. 
Project Name:  WEST THIRTY-SIX 
Primary Contact Name:  Jim Thomson 
Planning Application Type: Development 
Master Plan - Major Amendment 
APN(s):  219-38-981 
Reviewer: Souren Naradikian, P.E. 
Email: Souren.Naradikian@maricopa.gov 
Phone: 602-372-2907 
Planner Name:  Rachel Applegate 
Planning Case #:  DMP2023001 
Date: April 10, 2023 
 
Water and Waste Management Division

Page | 2  
 
 
Additional Notes –  
Environmental Services does not require these items for condition of approval of  DMP2023001, 
however these items must be addressed with the development of the site. Environmental Services 
does not require additional review of this case. 
 
*It should be noted that this document does not approve the referenced project. Comments are provided 
for the benefit of the applicant for MCESD permit requirements and as an advisory to Maricopa County 
Planning and Development Department. Other Maricopa County agencies may have additional 
requirements. Final review and approval will be made through Planning and Development Department 
procedures. Applicant may need to submit separate applications to the Maricopa County Environmental 
Services Department for approval of proposed facilities regulated by the Department. Review of any such 
application will be based on current regulations at the time of application.

Page | 1  
 
 
Subdivision 
Infrastructure  
& Planning Program 
301 W. Jefferson St. 
Phoenix, AZ 85003 
 
Subdi vi sio n@mari co pa.go v 
esd.mar i co pa.go v 
 
 
 
 
 
The Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MCESD) has completed review 
for the  Zone changes from RU-43 zoning district to R1-6, entitlements for approximately 490 
gross acres. planning case(s). Please note the following MCESD requirements for site 
development: 
Subdivision and Infrastructure –  
An Approval to Construct application is required and must be submitted to MCESD’s 
Subdivision & Infrastructure Program for water, reclaimed water and/or wastewater system 
infrastructure. 
 
A will serve letter issued by the Utility is required and must be submitted to MCESD’s 
Subdivision & Infrastructure Program if the site/development will be provided with water 
and/or reclaimed water by a Utility.  A capacity assurance letter issued by the Utility is 
required to MCESD’s Subdivision & Infrastructure Program if the site/development 
wastewater service is being provided by a Utility. 
 
An Approval of Sanitary Facilities (Subdivision) application is required to the MCESD’s 
Subdivision & Infrastructure Program for Subdivisions with Single Family Residences and 
for Condominiums/Town Homes.  
 
For subdivision related questions, please contact the Subdivision and Infrastructure 
Program at (602) 506-1058 or email subdivision@maricopa.gov. 
Additional Notes –  
Environmental Services does not require these items for condition of approval of  Z2023039 , however 
these items must be addressed with the development of the site. Environmental Services does not 
require additional review of this case. 
 
Project Name:  Zone changes from RU-43 
zoning district to R1-6, entitlements for 
approximately 490 gross acres. 
Primary Contact Name:  RAY BANKER 
Planning Application Type: Zone Change 
with Overlay 
APN(s):  219-38-981, 2   9-38-043, 219-
38-038H, 219-38-038P, 219-38- 038R, 
219-38-044, & 219-38-045 
Reviewer: Souren Naradikian, P.E. 
Email: Souren.Naradikian@maricopa.gov 
Phone: 602-372-2907 
Planner Name:  Rachel Applegate  
Planning Case #:  Z2023039  
Date: April 10, 2023 
 
Water and Waste Management Division

Page | 2  
 
 
*It should be noted that this document does not approve the referenced project. Comments are provided 
for the benefit of the applicant for MCESD permit requirements and as an advisory to Maricopa County 
Planning and Development Department. Other Maricopa County agencies may have additional 
requirements. Final review and approval will be made through Planning and Development Department 
procedures. Applicant may need to submit separate applications to the Maricopa County Environmental 
Services Department for approval of proposed facilities regulated by the Department. Review of any such 
application will be based on current regulations at the time of application.

Page 1 of 2 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bob Fedorka, PE 
Planning & Development 
301 W. Jefferson St., Suite 170 
Phoenix, Arizona 85003 
Phone: (602) 506-7151 
www.maricopa.gov/planning 
Email address: 
bob.fedorka@maricopa.gov 
Planning & Development 
 
Engineering Plan Review 
Date:    
July 26, 2023 
 
Memo To: Darren Gerard, AICP, Planning Manager, Department of Planning & 
Development 
 
Attn: 
Rachel Applegate, Sr. Planner, Planning & Development Services 
 
 
From: 
Bob Fedorka, P.E., Engineering Supervisor, Planning & Development 
Services 
 
cc: 
Michael Norris, P.E., Engineering Manager, Planning & Development 
 
Subject:   
Z2023039 - Zone Change (to R1-6 RUPD & C-2) 
 
DMP2023001 - DMP Amendment To DMP 90-4 
 
(E2 Memo) 
Job Site Address: SEC Rio Verde Drive and 176th Street, Rio Verde 
 
APN(s): 
219-38-981 + 6 Others 
   
This application is to specify zoning for future development and does not include a 
Plan of Development. 
 
PND Engineering Plan Review (DPR & FCD) has reviewed the 2nd submittal of the 
Zone Change application routed for review on July 6, 2023, and has no objections 
subject to the following conditions: 
 
1. Without the submittal of a precise plan of development, no development approval 
is inferred by this review, including, but not limited to number of proposed building 
lots/units, drainage/flood design, access and roadway alignments. These items 
will be addressed as development plans progress and are submitted to the 
County for further review and/or entitlement. 
 
2. Updated Traffic Studies must be submitted with each subsequent entitlement 
application(s) (preliminary plats or plans of development as the case may be). 
 
3. Each plat within the development must contain at least two (2) points of access 
in accordance with Maricopa County (MCDOT) Ordinance P-36 Article V. Each 
plat must be able to standalone with respect to site access and drainage 
requirements. 
 
4. The site is encumbered by large areas of Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) 
(FEMA Zone AE Floodplains). A CLOMR (and subsequent LOMR) is required to 
remove all proposed residential building lots and other development from the 
SFHAs.

Page 2 of 2 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5. Downstream discharges of the SFHAs are directed towards existing residential 
subdivision(s). The current discharge location and characteristics must be 
maintained as part of the CLOMR/drainage design.  
 
6. The are several non-delineated washes that traverse the site that discharge along 
the south and east boundaries. These historic discharges must be maintained as 
part of the overall drainage design.  
 
7. A singular overall master preliminary plat must be submitted for the entire 
development to address the overall drainage design for the project. Areas 
proposed for development should be designated as tracts (that will be 
subsequently re-platted to contain their own individual drainage & circulation 
designs). The master plat must include the main circulation corridor(s) that will 
feed each of the tracts. This master plat must be approved before any final plat 
can be approved.  
 
8. The Owner/Applicant is responsible for identifying and procuring any permit(s) for 
disturbance of, or work within delineated jurisdictional (404) washes from the US 
Army Corps of Engineers.  
 
9. Engineering review of DMP & Zoning cases is conceptual in nature. All 
development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 
of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; 
Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; 
and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of 
application for construction. 
 
 
The second submittal of the Traffic Impact Study is still pending. Comments will be 
provided once the review is completed by MCDOT. 
 
Please contact me if you have any questions or require any additional information.

https://maricopacounty.sharepoint.com/sites/DOTTSMO/TSMO Traffic Development/Z2023039 West 36 TIS Review.docx 
 
 
MCDOT -- TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 
REVIEW COMMENT SHEET 
1 of 2
Project Name: West 36 
Location: Rio Verde Drive & 176th Street 
MCDOT File No.: DMP2023001 & Z2023039
Date: 08/22/2023 
Reviewer: Amber Cauble 
Phone No.: 602.319.9083
Consultant: Y2K Engineering, LLC. 
Project No.:   
Plans Sealed By: Rae Stephani, PE
Consultant Code: 
A = Will Comply        B = Deleted 
C = Consultant to Evaluate
Item 
Number
Page 
Number
 
Comments
Consultant 
Reply
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
=  =  = 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1. 
 
 
 
2. 
 
 
3. 
 
 
 
 
4. 
 
 
 
5. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
=  =  = 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
General 
 
 
 
General 
 
 
Site Plan 
 
 
 
 
General 
 
 
 
Table 7 
2nd REVIEW (TIS) AMENDED 
 
Consultant:  Please use the code and respond to each comment in the 
Consultant Reply Column.  This sheet is for our record, please answer every 
question and sign and date your acknowledgement or the plans will be 
sent back to complete the process.  Send back the marked-up plans and a 
new set of plans along with this comment sheet.  Thank you for your 
cooperation. 
=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  = 
General Project Summary: 
 
The proposed residential community spans nearly 500 acres and is located at 
the southeast corner of Rio Verde Drive and 176th Street, in unincorporated 
Maricopa County.  The parcels included in this proposal are: 219-38-981, 
219-38-043, 219-38-038R, 219-38-038P, 219-38-038H, 219-38-044, and 219-
38-045.  The second submittal proposes two (2) full access driveways along 
Rio Verde Drive and three (3) emergency access driveways along 176th Steet. 
 
Per the TIS, the trip generation is based on ITE LUC 210 Single Family 
Detached Housing – with 1,200 total Dwelling Units (DU).  The proposed 
development is estimated to generate 9,926 total daily trips with 715 AM peak 
hour trips and 1,027 PM peak hour trips.  The development plans to open in 
2026 with full buildout by year 2033. 
 
Review Comments: 
 
The review comments, procedures, and requirements indicated below are in 
accordance with the latest edition (2023) of the Maricopa County Department 
of Transportation (MCDOT) Roadway Design Manual (RDM).   
 
Include all driveways in traffic analysis.  Additionally, discuss in text and 
display (site plan) which driveways (if any) will be gated. 
 
The site plan shown in Figure 5 and Appendix D is not acceptable.  Update 
site plan to include at minimum: right-of-way detail, location, size, and spacing 
of proposed driveways. Refer to Typical-Site-Plan-Example-with-Checklist-
PDF (maricopa.gov) for guidance.  
 
Clearly discuss master plan and development phasing.  Additionally, provide 
a detailed site plan for each phase of development.  TIS submittal for each 
phase may be required. 
 
The study indicates, in year 2036, dual right and dual left turn lanes are 
warranted for east bound right and northbound left.  Dual turn lanes are 
required for these movements final storage lengths shall be calculated as per 
the RDM reference section 6.1. 
Use CODE 
"A", "B","C" 
in this column 
next to every 
comment. 
 
 
 
=  =  =  =

https://maricopacounty.sharepoint.com/sites/DOTTSMO/TSMO Traffic Development/Z2023039 West 36 TIS Review.docx 
 
 
MCDOT -- TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 
REVIEW COMMENT SHEET 
2 of 2
Project Name: West 36 
Location: Rio Verde Drive & 176th Street 
MCDOT File No.: Z2023039
Date: 08/22/2023 
Reviewer: Amber Cauble 
Phone No.: 602.319.9083
Consultant: Y2K Engineering, LLC. 
Project No.:   
Plans Sealed By: Rae Stephani, PE
Consultant Code: 
A = Will Comply        B = Deleted 
C = Consultant to Evaluate
Item 
Number
Sheet 
Number
 
Comments
Consultant 
Reply
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
=  =  = 
 
 
6. 
 
 
7. 
 
 
 
 
 
8. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9. 
 
 
 
10. 
 
 
 
11. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
=  =  = 
 
 
General 
 
 
21 
 
 
 
 
 
22 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
General 
 
 
 
General 
 
 
 
General 
2nd REVIEW (TIS) Amended 
 
Consultant:  Please use the code and respond to each comment in the 
Consultant Reply Column.  This sheet is for our record, please answer every 
question and sign and date your acknowledgement or the plans will be 
sent back to complete the process.  Send back the marked-up plans and a 
new set of plans along with this comment sheet.  Thank you for your 
cooperation. 
=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  = 
Review Comments: 
 
Final determination/approval of site access will be made after the revised 
study is submitted to MCDOT addressing the comments in the current review. 
 
As shown in Table 8, signal warrants are met in build conditions.  Design, 
furnish and install traffic signal at Rio Verde Drive and Primary Road.  
MCDOT will accept the “pre-box” for signalization with a bond on file for the 
full signalization and intersection improvements to be completed when 600 
homes are built or the signal warrants are met, whichever is sooner.  
 
The future classification of Rio Verde Drive is minor principal arterial.  The full 
lane configuration will be two (2) east bound through lanes, a two-way left turn 
lane, and two (2) west bound through lanes.  Half-street improvements shall 
be per RDM Figure 5.3 and will require further coordination with MCDOT as 
the TWLTL and additional through lanes will be installed north of the existing 
roadway to achieve proper alignment.  Note: additional requirements may be 
implemented as part of the permitting process. 
 
Provide/maintain minimum of 100’ R/W on Rio Verde Drive, plus any 
additional R/W as it relates to the signal, turn lanes, and any other 
improvements along site frontage. 
 
The future classification of 176th Street is local road.  Provide a minimum 
pavement width of 28’ with half-street improvements per latest MCDOT RDM, 
refer to Figure 5.12. 
 
Provide/maintain minimum of 100’ R/W along site frontage of 176th Street, 
plus any additional R/W as it relates to the improvements along site frontage. 
 
The Traffic Impact Study is CONDITIONALLY APPROVED only as it 
pertains to the DMP2023001 application.  The conditional approval is 
based on the response letter dated 8/21/2023 stating the developer will 
(be) “addressing all of these comments in their entirety with the first 
submittal of a preliminary plat for the first phase of this project.” 
 
Signature: _____________________________________ Date: ___________ 
Use CODE 
"A", "B","C" 
in this column 
next to every 
comment. 
 
 
 
=  =  =  =

1921 S. Alma School Rd, Ste 204 \ Mesa, AZ 85210 
480.696.1701 
 
 
info@y2keng.com 
August 21, 2023 
Amber Cauble 
Engineer Associate – Traffic Development Branch 
Transportation 
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS (TSMO) Division 
2901 W. Durango Street Phoenix, AZ 85009 
 
RE:  DMP2023001 & Z2023039 
Dear Ms. Cauble: 
We received and acknowledge the second round of comments on the above cases.  Please see attached 
comments dated 8/15/2023.  Per the conference call with Toll and Tiffany & Bosco representatives on 
August 17, 2023, we agree, on behalf of Toll Bros. and Shea Hoes, to addressing all of these comments in 
their entirety with the first submittal of a preliminary plat for the first phase of this project. 
We appreciate County staff’s willingness to address the details outlined in the MCDOT comments when a 
more defined site plan and engineered preliminary plat is submitted to the County for review and approval 
at the platting stage. Thank you. 
 
Sincerely, 
 
 
Rae Stephani, PE, PTOE, RSP1  
Project Manager 
Y2K Engineering, LLC

https://maricopacounty.sharepoint.com/sites/DOTTSMO/TSMO Traffic Development/Z2023039 West 36 TIS Review.docx 
 
 
MCDOT -- TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 
REVIEW COMMENT SHEET 
1 of 2
Project Name: West 36 
Location: Rio Verde Drive & 176th Street 
MCDOT File No.: DMP2023001 & Z2023039
Date: 08/15/2023 
Reviewer: Amber Cauble 
Phone No.: 602.319.9083
Consultant: Y2K Engineering, LLC. 
Project No.:   
Plans Sealed By: Rae Stephani, PE
Consultant Code: 
A = Will Comply        B = Deleted 
C = Consultant to Evaluate
Item 
Number
Page 
Number
 
Comments
Consultant 
Reply
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
=  =  = 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1. 
 
 
 
2. 
 
 
3. 
 
 
 
 
4. 
 
 
 
5. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
=  =  = 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
General 
 
 
 
General 
 
 
Site Plan 
 
 
 
 
General 
 
 
 
Table 7 
2nd REVIEW (TIS) 
 
Consultant:  Please use the code and respond to each comment in the 
Consultant Reply Column.  This sheet is for our record, please answer every 
question and sign and date your acknowledgement or the plans will be 
sent back to complete the process.  Send back the marked-up plans and a 
new set of plans along with this comment sheet.  Thank you for your 
cooperation. 
=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  = 
General Project Summary: 
 
The proposed residential community spans nearly 500 acres and is located at 
the southeast corner of Rio Verde Drive and 176th Street, in unincorporated 
Maricopa County.  The parcels included in this proposal are: 219-38-981, 
219-38-043, 219-38-038R, 219-38-038P, 219-38-038H, 219-38-044, and 219-
38-045.  The second submittal proposes two (2) full access driveways along 
Rio Verde Drive and three (3) emergency access driveways along 176th Steet. 
 
Per the TIS, the trip generation is based on ITE LUC 210 Single Family 
Detached Housing – with 1,200 total Dwelling Units (DU).  The proposed 
development is estimated to generate 9,926 total daily trips with 715 AM peak 
hour trips and 1,027 PM peak hour trips.  The development plans to open in 
2026 with full buildout by year 2033. 
 
Review Comments: 
 
The review comments, procedures, and requirements indicated below are in 
accordance with the latest edition (2023) of the Maricopa County Department 
of Transportation (MCDOT) Roadway Design Manual (RDM).   
 
Include all driveways in traffic analysis.  Additionally, discuss in text and 
display (site plan) which driveways (if any) will be gated. 
 
The site plan shown in Figure 5 and Appendix D is not acceptable.  Update 
site plan to include at minimum: right-of-way detail, location, size, and spacing 
of proposed driveways. Refer to Typical-Site-Plan-Example-with-Checklist-
PDF (maricopa.gov) for guidance.  
 
Clearly discuss master plan and development phasing.  Additionally, provide 
a detailed site plan for each phase of development.  TIS submittal for each 
phase may be required. 
 
The study indicates, in year 2036, dual right and dual left turn lanes are 
warranted for east bound right and northbound left.  Dual turn lanes are 
required for these movements final storage lengths shall be calculated as per 
the RDM reference section 6.1. 
Use CODE 
"A", "B","C" 
in this column 
next to every 
comment. 
 
 
 
=  =  =  =

https://maricopacounty.sharepoint.com/sites/DOTTSMO/TSMO Traffic Development/Z2023039 West 36 TIS Review.docx 
 
 
MCDOT -- TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 
REVIEW COMMENT SHEET 
2 of 2
Project Name: West 36 
Location: Rio Verde Drive & 176th Street 
MCDOT File No.: Z2023039
Date: 08/15/2023 
Reviewer: Amber Cauble 
Phone No.: 602.319.9083
Consultant: Y2K Engineering, LLC. 
Project No.:   
Plans Sealed By: Rae Stephani, PE
Consultant Code: 
A = Will Comply        B = Deleted 
C = Consultant to Evaluate
Item 
Number
Sheet 
Number
 
Comments
Consultant 
Reply
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
=  =  = 
 
 
6. 
 
 
7. 
 
 
 
 
 
8. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9. 
 
 
 
10. 
 
 
 
11. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
=  =  = 
 
 
General 
 
 
21 
 
 
 
 
 
22 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
General 
 
 
 
General 
 
 
 
General 
2nd REVIEW (TIS) 
 
Consultant:  Please use the code and respond to each comment in the 
Consultant Reply Column.  This sheet is for our record, please answer every 
question and sign and date your acknowledgement or the plans will be 
sent back to complete the process.  Send back the marked-up plans and a 
new set of plans along with this comment sheet.  Thank you for your 
cooperation. 
=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  = 
Review Comments: 
 
Final determination/approval of site access will be made after the revised 
study is submitted to MCDOT addressing the comments in the current review. 
 
As shown in Table 8, signal warrants are met in build conditions.  Design, 
furnish and install traffic signal at Rio Verde Drive and Primary Road.  
MCDOT will accept the “pre-box” for signalization with a bond on file for the 
full signalization and intersection improvements to be completed when 600 
homes are built or the signal warrants are met, whichever is sooner.  
 
The future classification of Rio Verde Drive is minor principal arterial.  The full 
lane configuration will be two (2) east bound through lanes, a two-way left turn 
lane, and two (2) west bound through lanes.  Half-street improvements shall 
be per RDM Figure 5.3 and will require further coordination with MCDOT as 
the TWLTL and additional through lanes will be installed north of the existing 
roadway to achieve proper alignment.  Note: additional requirements may be 
implemented as part of the permitting process. 
 
Provide/maintain minimum of 100’ R/W on Rio Verde Drive, plus any 
additional ROW as it relates to the signal, turn lanes, and any other 
improvements along site frontage. 
 
The future classification of 176th Street is local road.  Provide a minimum 
pavement width of 28’ with half-street improvements per latest MCDOT RDM, 
refer to Figure 5.12. 
 
Provide/maintain minimum of 100’ R/W along site frontage of 176th Street, 
plus any additional ROW as it relates to the improvements along site frontage. 
 
The Traffic Impact Study is NOT approved. 
 
 
 
Signature: _____________________________________ Date: ___________ 
 
Use CODE 
"A", "B","C" 
in this column 
next to every 
comment. 
 
 
 
=  =  =  =

2355 West Pinnacle Peak Road, Suite 300 
Phoenix, AZ 85027 USA 
epcor.com 
 
06/20/2023 
 
Carla Consoli 
May Potenza Baran & Gillespie 
1850 N. Central Ave., 16th Floor, 
Phoenix, AZ 85004-4633 
 
 
Sent via e-mail to:  cconsoli@maypotenza.com 
 
Re:   
Will-Serve Letter for Water and Sewer Service 
 
West Thirty Six 
 
This letter is in response to your request to EPCOR Water Arizona Inc. (“EPCOR”), to provide a Will 
Serve letter for the property known as “West Thirty Six” in the Rio Verde community within Maricopa 
County (the Project). The Project consists of multiple parcels with APNs 219-38-981, 219-38-043, 219-
38-038H, 219-38-038P, 219-38-038R, 219-38-044, and 219-38-045.  EPCOR provides the following 
information for your consideration: 
 
1. EPCOR has confirmed that the Project is located within the area encompassed by EPCOR’s 
Certificate of Convenience & Necessity (CC&N) as issued by the Arizona Corporation 
Commission (“Commission”) for water service.   
2. The Project is not currently located within the area encompassed by EPCOR’s CC&N as issued 
by the Commission for sewer service. This Will Serve letter is conditioned upon EPCOR 
receiving approval from the Commission to expand its CC&N to provide sewer service to the 
Project. 
3. Water and sewer service to the Project by EPCOR will be provided pursuant to the rates, 
charges, terms and conditions set forth in the tariffs of EPCOR as filed with the Commission.  
Such services may be limited or conditioned by orders and decisions from the Commission and 
the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality. 
4. Water and sewer service to the Project by EPCOR will be conditioned upon developer entering 
into a Master Utility Agreement with EPCOR, in a form that is acceptable to EPCOR, and upon 
developer fully performing its obligations under the Master Utility Agreement. 
5. If the Project proceeds in phases, water and wastewater service to each individual phase within 
the Project will be conditioned upon developer entering into a Main Extension Agreement (an 
“MXA”) with EPCOR, in a form acceptable to EPCOR, and upon developer fully performing its 
obligations under the MXA.  The MXA will provide, among other things, that developer will be 
responsible for constructing at its cost the water main extensions necessary to distribute water 
from EPCOR’s water system to the Project and all sewer main extensions necessary to connect 
the Project to EPCOR’s sewer system.  The design and construction of the main extensions will 
be subject to EPCOR’s approvals, and ownership of the main extensions, together with related 
DMP2023001 &
Z2023039
07/06/2023 9:31:27 AM

-        - 
2 
real property easement rights, must be transferred to EPCOR prior to the initiation of water or 
wastewater service to the subject parcel within the Project. 
6. A.R.S. 45-576 requires land owners wishing to develop subdivisions in Active Management 
Areas not served by a designated provider to obtain a Certificate of Assured Water Supply 
(CAWS). The owner of the Project is therefore required to obtain a CAWS. This letter is not an 
indication that the requirement to obtain a CAWS has been met. 
 
This letter assumes that construction of the water and wastewater improvements for the Development 
will begin within one (1) year after the date of this letter.  If developer begins construction of any part of 
the water or wastewater improvements for the Development without the prior written approval of such 
construction by EPCOR, developer will be proceeding with such construction at its own risk.   
 
This letter does not independently create any rights or obligations in either developer, or EPCOR, and 
is provided to developer for information only.  Any agreement between developer and EPCOR for water 
or sewer service to the Development must be memorialized in a written agreement executed and 
delivered by their respective authorized representatives. 
 
For additional information, please contact me at (480) 271-9932 or at alovisetto@epcor.com 
 
Sincerely, 
 
Alex Lovisetto, P.E. 
Engineering Manager

MEMORANDUM 
To:  
Maricopa County Planning and Development Department  
From:   
Colin Phipps 
Date: 
 
June 30, 2023 
CC: 
 
William Lally 
Subject: 
West Thirty-Six (Z2023039 and DMP2023001) ADWR Submittal Materials 
 
To provide the Department additional background regarding subject project’s assured waters supply 
entitlements, enclosed are materials that have been submitted to the Arizona Department of Water Resources 
(ADWR) in furtherance of acquiring an Analysis of Assured Water Supply (AAWS) and ultimately a Certificate of 
Assured Water Supply (CAWS). The materials also include a memorandum prepared by the project’s 
hydrological consultant that summarizes the findings of the hydrogeological model prepared for the Fountain 
Hills Sub-basin (FHS) in which the project is located. For background, the AAWS application for the project and 
supporting hydrogeological model report was formally submitted to ADWR on September 12, 2022.  ADWR 
provided comments to the AAWS application and modeling report on March 29, 2023.  A revised AAWS 
application, revised model memorandum, and response letter were submitted to ADWR on June 5, 2023. 
1. West Thirty-Six Modeling Summary Memo.  Technical memorandum prepared by Matrix New World, 
and sealed by Stephen Noel, RG, on June 29, 2023.  This memorandum explains the impact of the 
West Thirty-Six project on wells and committed groundwater supplies within the FHS as predicted by 
the FHS hydrogeological model. 
2. West Thirty-Six Response Letter. The response letter, prepared by Matrix New World and dated June 
5, 2023, restates ADWR’s comments on the initial AAWS submittal and provides responses to those 
comments.  The letter also contains ADWR’s initial review letter, and West Thirty-Six’s revised AAWS 
application. 
3. Revised Fountain Hills AWS Model Memorandum.  The response memo, prepared by Matrix New 
World and dated June 6, 2023, restates ADWR’s comments to the initial submittal of the 
hydrogeological model and provides responses to those comments. It also provides revised modeling 
results stemming from the incorporation of ADWR’s comments (see Conclusions on page 10). The 
memo also provides revised report figures resulting from the ADWR comments.  Note the memo 
supplements and supersedes the initial submittal of the hydrogeological model report.   
4. Fountain Hills Mode Report.  Demonstration of Physical Availability of Groundwater prepared by 
Matrix New World and sealed by Stephen Noel, RG, on September 8, 2022.   This is the initial submittal 
of the FHS hydrogeological model report to ADWR.  It is supplemented and superseded by the 
aforementioned Revised Fountain Hills AWS Model Memorandum.  
DMP2023001 &
Z2023039
07/06/2023 9:33:23 AM

Matrix New World Engineering 
 
3033 N. 44 Street, Ste 270 
 
Phoenix, AZ 85018 
 
602.955.5547    973.240.1800 
 
mnwe.com    WBE 
S:\MyDocs\SGCPRJ\2022\22-1279 West Thirty-Six Modeling\Well Report\West Thirty-Six Modeling Update Memo_FINAL.docx 
 
 
 
MEMORANDUM 
 
TO: 
Toll Brothers  
  
CC: 
Carla A. Consoli 
FROM: 
Stephen D. Noel, RG 
DATE: 
June 29, 2023 
RE: 
Fountain Hills Sub-Basin Groundwater Flow Modeling Results Update for West 
Thirty-Six Property Maricopa County, AZ 
 
 
The purpose of this memorandum is to explain the impact as predicted by the Fountain Hills Sub-basin 
Model on wells and committed groundwater supplies within the Sub-basin as a result of planned 
development. Based on ADWR comments on March 29, 2023, Matrix revised the Fountain Hills Sub-
basin Model. The revised predictive model results indicate that no well completed in the regional aquifer 
will dry out due to the water demands assumed for the planned West Thirty-Six development, and that 
there would be sufficient groundwater available to adequately serve West Thirty-Six, and existing and 
committed demands for the next 100 years.  
 
Matrix developed the model using current model building techniques and importing ADWR available data 
for the current and committed withdrawals of groundwater in the Sub-basin. The revised model is 
currently being reviewed by ADWR and has not yet been approved. This brief memorandum outlines the 
predicted drawdown within the Sub-basin resulting from the planned development. The Fountain Hills 
Sub-basin model has four geological units or layers. Layer 1 represents the floodplain alluvial deposits, 
occurring in stream channels along the rivers within the Sub-basin. Layer 2 represents the alluvial 
deposits outside of the floodplain and generally do not contain river surface water with distance from the 
floodplain. Layer 3 represents thick clay and silt deposits, which generally impedes groundwater flow 
through the layer. Layer 4 is composed of fractured conglomerate with groundwater. This layer represents 
the regional aquifer where most groundwater pumping occurs.   
 
The estimated depth to bedrock in the area is deepest in the central part of the basin around 4,800 feet 
below land surface (ft bls) and becomes shallower towards the mountains near the edges of the model 
at 400 ft bls or less (Figure 1). Figure 2 shows the groundwater surface elevation in the area which ranges 
above 1,800 feet above mean seal level (ft amsl) in the northwest to below 1,400 ft amsl in the southeast. 
  
Matrix used the Fountain Hills Sub-basin Model to review impacts to the regional aquifer from the West 
Thirty-Six Property pumping. Figure 3 depicts that pumping the West Thirty-Six Property revised demand 
of 684.99 acre-feet per year (ac-ft/yr) for the 100-year predictive period resulted in a maximum of 56 feet 
of regional groundwater drawdown. The 100-year impact analysis assumes the West Thirty-Six Property 
is built-out and pumping the total groundwater demand of 684.99 ac-ft/yr beginning on day one of 2023 
which of course is not the reality, but this lends to a more conservative analysis of the impact of the 
development on the aquifer.

MEMORANDUM 
From: Stephen D. Noel, RG 
RE: Fountain Hills Sub-basin 
Groundwater Flow Modeling Results 
West Thirty-Six Property, Maricopa County, AZ 
June 29, 2023 
Page 2 of 2 
S:\MyDocs\SGCPRJ\2022\22-1279 West Thirty-Six Modeling\Well Report\West Thirty-Six Modeling Update Memo_FINAL.docx 
Based on the revised model results, Matrix concludes: (1) that the Sub-basin regional aquifer contains 
sufficient groundwater to meet the demands for the planned development and other issued demands for 
the next 100 years; (2) the modeled 100-year depth to groundwater in the Sub-basin wells does not 
exceed the limit of 1,000 ft bls established by ADWR; and (3) the model shows that no wells completed 
within the regional aquifer in the model domain would be caused to go dry or to have a depth to static 
water level exceeding 1,000 ft bls in 100 years. 
 
Because of the heightened sensitivity for individual users of exempt wells, Matrix reviewed registration 
information on exempt wells in the Sub-basin which reveals the majority of exempt wells are located 
where five feet or less of groundwater drawdown is predicted at the end of the 100-year period (Figure 3). 
The number of registered exempt wells located within areas predicted to have more than one foot but 
less than 56 feet of drawdown after the 100-year predictive period are listed in Chart 1 below. 
 
    Chart 1  Wells with more than One Foot of Drawdown after 100-years 
Drawdown Range (feet) 
Total Number of Exempt Wells 
1 - 5 
704 
5 - 10 
28 
10 - 15 
8 
15 - 25 
5 
25 - 35 
2 
35 - 56 
3 
 
A list of the forty-six (46) wells located within the 5 to 56 foot 100-year groundwater drawdown areas is 
attached. Matrix reviewed the groundwater level and well construction depth information contained in the 
available driller’s logs and compared this information to the modeled impacts. None of the wells drilled 
below 300 ft bls with available driller’s logs indicate that the wells will go dry as a result of the modeled 
impacts of the West Thirty-Six water demand.

S:\MyDocs\SGCPRJ\2022\22-1279 West Thirty-Six Modeling\GIS\MXDs\Figure1_Depth_To_Bedrock_Map.mxd
Jomax Rd
Four Corners Transmi Rd
55-902105
1150
55-599495
1200
55-576537
2020
55-564066
1140
55-561226
1170
55-508186
1960
55-214452
1200
55-213452
1220
55-210785
1330
55-204961
2600
55-205006
1213
FH160
136th St
Rio Verde Dr
144th St
FH403
168th St
128th St
160th St
152nd St
Fort Mcdowell Rd
McDowell Mountain Rd
Forest Rd
156th St
Lone Mountain Rd
Dixileta Dr
Paraiso Dr
Needlerock Rd
Thompson Peak Rd
174th St
141st St
138th St
Bartlett Dam Rd S
Hawknest Rd
Peak View Rd
Montello Rd
126th St
Pinnacle Vista Dr
Pinnacle Peak Rd
Verde River
Camp Creek
Sycamore Creek
Ironwood Wash
McDowell Mtns
McDowell Mtns
400
800
3200
1600
4800
400
T. 5 N.
T. 6 N.
T. 4 N.
R. 5 E.
R. 6 E.
R. 7 E.
R. 8 E. EXPLANATION
Well Showing Total Depth
Without Encountering Bedrock
   55-508186 ADWR Registry Number
       1960 Depth of well (ft bls)
Depth to Bedrock Contour
(ft bls)(Richard et.al., 2007)
West Thirty-Six 
Township
Hardrock Outcrop
Stream
Total Aquifer Thickness (feet)
0 - 400
401 - 800
801 - 1,200
1,201 - 1,600
1,601 - 2,000
2,001 - 2,400
2,401 - 2,800
2,801 - 3,200
Matrix New World Engineering, PC
3033 North 44th Street, Suite 270
Phoenix, Arizona 85018
Certified WBE
Tel: 602-955-5547
Fax: 602-955-7585
www.mnwe.com
1
DEPTH TO BEDROCK MAP
FIGURE NUMBER:
DATE:
01/10/2023
DATE:
01/10/2023
DRAWN BY:
BM
APPROVED BY:
DH
PROJECT NUMBER:
22-1279
WEST THIRTY-SIX
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA
p
Notes
Service Layer Credits: , AZGS, USGS, ADWR
ft bls - feet below land surface
0
1
2
Miles
Model currently in review by ADWR for approval

S:\MyDocs\SGCPRJ\2022\22-1279 West Thirty-Six Modeling\GIS\MXDs\Figure2_Groundwater_Level_Map.mxd
Jomax Rd
Four Corners Transmi Rd
2000
2200
2100
1900
1800
1700
1600
2300
2400
1500
2500
2600
2700
2800
2200
2300
1700
2400
2600
1600
2400
2300
1900
2600
1700
1600
2600
2000
1800
2200
2200
2200
2400
2500
2200
2600
Verde River
Camp Creek
Sycamore Creek
Ironwood Wash
58
1489
348
1887
644
1698
180
1780
08
10
17
15
12
25
13
29
22
27
34
20
32
36
25
27
31
20
28
24
17
08
16
15
09
10
31
11
24
24
13
12
12
33
28
36
23
11
26
16
29
14
30
30
17
29
21
13
28
12
01
14
20
11
25
21
32
21
34
08
26
23
36
27
29
19
16
35
30
35
33
19
26
25
13
12
07
08
28
26
20
17
09
18
25
24
18
13
24
09
19
05
07
06
18
22
27
07
04
03
22
15
30
02
05
10
19
01
04
01
02
03
04
05
18
05
06
01
07
02
06
01
04
03
06
12
13
24
25
14
01
23
35
26
07
23
14
11
18
02
19
06
30
26
23
14
11
02
35
34
33
32
31
36
35
07
34
18
36
33
19
30
32
31
31
33
32
34
36
35
36
36
31
31
32
33
34
35
36
06
31
31
35
35
16
09
21
23
14
11
02
McDowell Mtns
McDowell Mtns
1600
1800
FH160
136th St
Rio Verde Dr
144th St
FH403
168th St
128th St
160th St
152nd St
Fort Mcdowell Rd
McDowell Mountain Rd
Forest Rd
156th St
Lone Mountain Rd
Dixileta Dr
Paraiso Dr
Needlerock Rd
174th St
141st St
138th St
142nd St
130th St
Montello Rd
126th St
Box Bar Rd
Pinnacle Peak Rd
1500
1700
1400
T. 5 N.
T. 6 N.
T. 4 N.
R. 5 E.
R. 6 E.
R. 7 E.
R. 8 E. EXPLANATION
Oct.20 - Mar.22 Static
Groundwater Level Well
   180   Depth to Groundwater (ft bls)
  1780   Water Level Elevation (ft amsl) 
Groundwater Elevation
Contour ( ft msl )
Contour Interval - 100 feet
Groundwater Flow Direction
Land Surface Elevation
Contour ( ft msl )
Contour Interval - 100 feet
West Thirty-Six 
Township
Section
Hardrock Outcrop
Stream
Matrix New World Engineering, PC
3033 North 44th Street, Suite 270
Phoenix, Arizona 85018
Certified WBE
Tel: 602-955-5547
Fax: 602-955-7585
www.mnwe.com
2
GROUNDWATER LEVEL MAP
FIGURE NUMBER:
DATE:
01/10/2023
DATE:
01/10/2023
DRAWN BY:
BM
APPROVED BY:
DH
PROJECT NUMBER:
22-1279
WEST THIRTY-SIX
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA
p
Notes
Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-
cubed, AZGS, USGS, ADWR
ft amsl - feet above mean sea level
ft bls - feet below land surface
0
1
2
Miles

S:\MyDocs\SGCPRJ\2022\22-1279 West Thirty-Six Modeling\GIS\MXDs\Figure3_100yr_Drawdown_June2023model.mxd
!=
!=
!=
!=
!=
!=
!=
!=
!=
!=
!=
!=
!=!=
Jomax Rd
EPCOR RVU
EPCOR RVU
EPCOR RVU
EPCOR RVU
EPCOR RVU
Rio Highlands
Dixileta Ranch
Dixileta Ranch
West Thirty-Six
Rio Verde Box Bar Ranch
Rio Verde Drive LLC 
Development
Utility Northern Scottsdale
Utility Northern Scottsdale
Utility Northern Scottsdale
McDowell Mtns
McDowell Mtns
FH160
136th St
Rio Verde Dr
144th St
FH403
168th St
128th St
160th St
152nd St
Fort Mcdowell Rd
McDowell Mountain Rd
Forest Rd
156th St
Lone Mountain Rd
Dixileta Dr
148th St
Paraiso Dr
Needlerock Rd
Four Corners Transmi Rd
Thompson Peak Rd
174th St
150th St
141st St
138th St
132nd St
164th St
142nd St
Bartlett Dam Rd S
Hawknest Rd
130th St
140th St
Peak View Rd
Montello Rd
162nd St
126th St
Pinnacle Peak Rd
T. 5 N.
T. 6 N.
T. 4 N.
R. 5 E.
R. 6 E.
R. 7 E.
R. 8 E. EXPLANATION
!=
Simulated AWS Well
Simulated Exempt Well
West Thirty-Six 
ADWR Verde River Subflow Zone
Township
Hardrock Outcrop
100-Year Drawdown in feet
0 - 1
1 - 5
5 - 10
10 - 15
15 - 25
25 - 35
35 - 56
DRAWN BY:
BM
PROJECT NUMBER:
22-1279
APPROVED BY:
EM
Matrix New World Engineering, PC
3033 North 44th Street, Suite 270
Phoenix, Arizona 85018
Certified WBE
Tel: 602-955-5547
Fax: 602-955-7585
www.mnwe.com
3
FIGURE NUMBER:
DATE:
06/27/2023
DATE:
06/27/2023
WEST THIRTY-SIX
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA
100-YEAR DRAWDOWN
DUE TO PUMPING ONLY AT WEST 36
p
Notes
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P
Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL,
Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c)
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, AZGS, USGS,
ADWR
AWS - Assured Water Supply
0
1
2
Miles
Model currently in review by ADWR for approval

ADWR Registered Exempt Wells Located Within the 5' to 56' 100-year Drawdown Area
55-
Legal
Location
Well
Type
 Water
Uses
Installed
TD
WL
Casing 
Depth
Casing 
Width
Pump 
Rate
Drill
 Log
Owner
Perf 
Interval
55-614022
MARICOPA COUNTY,
EXEMPT
UNUSED
 
0
0
6
0
A(4-6)22 CAC
55-623551
MARICOPA COUNTY,
EXEMPT
 
4/5/1945
196
0
0
0
A(4-6)28 BBC
55-517133
LABORDE,T H
EXEMPT - 
DOMESTIC STOCK
 
5/13/1987
209
205
6
0
X
A(4-7)07 AAB
55-578852
SHERRY YOUNG LOZON
EXEMPT
 
480
480
8
0
A(5-6)14 CCA
55-516906
LABORDE, T.H.,
EXEMPT - 
DOMESTIC STOCK
DOMESTIC
259.5 
1/17/2003
380-462
3/31/1987
462
462
6
10
X
A(5-6)14 CCA
55-902031
BKNY SOUTHWEST 
INVESTMENT LLC
EXEMPT
 
8/30/2005
550
550
5
0
X
A(5-6)14 CCC
55-586508
DEBRA DEVROU
EXEMPT
 
11/29/2001
400
400
6
0
X
A(5-6)14 CCD
55-576791
DIANE THREADGILL
EXEMPT
 
9/13/1999
820
820
5
0
X
A(5-6)22 AAA
55-598767
LYNNE D JENKINS
EXEMPT
 
0
0
0
0
A(5-6)22 DBA
55-238703
BRIAN RAAB
EXEMPT
 
0
0
0
0
A(5-6)22 DCA
55-210285
KHADLOON ALJABERI
EXEMPT
 
1000
1000
7
0
X
A(5-6)22 DDB
55-233072
DALTON THOMPSON
EXEMPT
 
2/9/2021
720
710
5
15
X
A(5-6)22 DDC
55-209049
KRISTIN CONRAD & 
DUSTAN EWING TRUSTEES 
OF THE EWING-CONRAD
EXEMPT
 
8/11/2006
250
250
7
0
X
A(5-6)23 AAB
55-591553
STEVEN M. & SUSAN R. 
ROBINSON
EXEMPT
 
4/25/2002
540
530
5
6
X
A(5-6)23 AAB
55-580947
ROBERT & GRACE ORIGEL
EXEMPT
 
6/17/2000
580
580
5
25
X
A(5-6)23 AAC
55-210551
AZ RIO VERDE LLC C/O 
DOYLE OR BUBA
EXEMPT
 
2/19/2006
220
208
5
0
X
A(5-6)23 AAD
55-233078
BRIAN D. GRINDLESPERGER
EXEMPT
 
760
680
7
5
X
A(5-6)23 ABC
55-553173
DAVID E GALLI
EXEMPT
 
12/24/1995
700
700
7
5
X
A(5-6)23 ACB
55-598656
DAVID J OWENS
EXEMPT
 
6/28/2003
506
506
6
0
X
A(5-6)23 ADA
55-214094
DAVID OWENS
EXEMPT
 
8/8/2007
240
240
6
0
X
A(5-6)23 ADA
55-562045
FRANK & DOROTHY CUCCIA
EXEMPT
 
7/25/1997
660
240
6
0
X
A(5-6)23 BBA
ADWR Registered Exempt Wells Located Within the 5' to 56' 100-year Drawdown Area: Page 1 of 3