Minutes of the Regular Meeting held on April 18, 2024

City of Chandler — Regular Meeting (2024-05-09)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 75820 characters
Meeting Minutes 
City Council Regular Meeting 
 
April 18, 2024 | 6:00 p.m. 
Chandler City Council Chambers  
88 E. Chicago St., Chandler, AZ 
 
 
Call to Order 
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Kevin Hartke at 6:00 p.m. 
 
Roll Call 
Council Attendance 
 
 
 
 
Appointee Attendance 
Mayor Kevin Hartke  
 
 
 
 
Josh Wright, City Manager 
Vice Mayor OD Harris 
 
 
 
 
Kelly Schwab, City Attorney  
Councilmember Angel Encinas   
 
 
Dana DeLong, City Clerk 
Councilmember Christine Ellis 
 
 
 
  
Councilmember Mark Stewart 
  
 
 
Councilmember Matt Orlando  
 
 
 
Councilmember Jane Poston 
 
 
Invocation 
The invocation was given by Reverend Sarah Oglesby-Dunegan, Valley Unitarian Universalist.  
 
Pledge of Allegiance 
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Orlando.  
 
Consent Agenda and Discussion 
City Clerk 
1.  
 Approval of Minutes   
Move City Council approve the Council meeting minutes of the Study Session of April 1, 
2024, the Special Meeting of April 4, 2024, and the Regular Meeting of April 4, 2024. 
  
2.  
Board and Commission Appointments   
   
Move City Council approve the Board and Commission appointments as recommended.

Page 2 of 34 
 
 
 
 
Cultural Development 
3.  
 Agreement No. CD4-918-4725, with AMS Planning & Research Corp., for the Arts Facilities 
Needs Assessment   
Move City Council approve Agreement No. CD4-918-4725, with AMS Planning & Research 
Corp., for the Arts Facilities Needs Assessment, in the amount of $122,900. 
 
Development Services  
4.  
Introduction and Tentative Adoption of Ordinance No. 5091, Rezoning and Preliminary 
Development Plan, PLH23-0055 Irgens Ascend, Generally Located at the Northwest Corner 
of Cooper Road and Germann Road   
   
Rezoning 
Move City Council introduce and tentatively adopt Ordinance No. 5091 approving PLH23-
0055 Irgens Ascend, amending the existing Planned Area Development (PAD) zoning to 
allow showroom uses, subject to the conditions as recommended by Planning and Zoning 
Commission 
Preliminary Development Plan 
Move City Council approve Preliminary Development Plan PLH23-0055 Irgens Ascend for 
site layout and building architecture for an industrial building and a showroom building, 
subject to the conditions as recommended by Planning and Zoning Commission. 
  
5.  
Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan, PLH23-0063 CBREIM Frye, Rezoning from 
Planned Industrial (I-1) District to Planned Area Development (PAD) for a data center with 
Mid-Rise Overlay to allow building heights up to 95 feet and Preliminary Development Plan 
approval to expand an existing data center facility, located at 2500 W. Frye Road, generally 
located one-half mile south and east of Chandler Boulevard and Price Road   
Move City Council continue Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan PLH23-0063 
CBREIM Frye, to the May 9, 2024, City Council meeting. 
  
6.  
Resolution No. 5796, Authorizing a License Agreement between Light Source 
Communications LLC, and the City of Chandler for the Use of Public Property for the 
Establishment of Class 4 and Class 5 Communications Systems   
Move City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 5796, authorizing the Mayor to execute 
the license agreement between Light Source Communications LLC, and the City of Chandler 
for the use of facilities in the city's rights-of-way and public places to establish Class 4 and 
Class 5 Communications Systems, and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute 
other documents as needed to give effect to the agreement. 
 
Facilities and Fleet 
7.  
 Agreement No. BF2-910-4446, Amendment No. 3, for Electrical Maintenance, Repair, and 
Installation Services

Page 3 of 34 
 
 
 
Move City Council approve Agreement No. BF2-910-4446, Amendment No. 3, with Corbins 
Service Electric; DECA Southwest; Hampton Tedder Technical Services; Hawkeye Electric, 
Inc.; K2 Electric, LLC; and Swain Electric, Inc., for electrical maintenance repair and 
installation services, in an amount not to exceed $1,260,000, for the period of six months, 
beginning April 1, 2024, through September 30, 2024. 
  
8.  
 Agreement No. FF4-918-4729, Citywide Security Camera Assessment   
Move City Council approve Agreement No. FF4-918-4729, with IXP Corporation, for a 
citywide security camera assessment, for an amount not to exceed $158,500. 
  
9.  
 Purchase of Furniture and Related Services for Space Utilization Improvements   
Move City Council approve the purchase of furniture and related services, utilizing the State 
of Arizona Contract No. CTR067396, with Corporate Interior Systems, Inc., and the State of 
Arizona Contract No. CTR067402, with Goodmans, Inc., in an amount not to exceed 
$637,328. 
 
Fire Department 
10.  
 Purchase of Fire Apparatus   
Move City Council approve the purchase of a fire apparatus, utilizing the Houston Galveston 
Area Council (H-GAC) Contract No. FS12-19, or the Sourcewell Contract No. 113021, in an 
amount not to exceed $1,250,000 and approve a General Fund Contingency transfer of 
$1,250,000 to allow for creation of the purchase order in the current fiscal year. 
 
Information Technology 
11.  
 Agreement No. 4538, Amendment No. 3, with SAR Systems, LLC, for Professional Services 
to Implement Human Resources Benefits Administration System and Human Resources 
System Enhancements   
Move City Council approve Agreement No. 4538, Amendment No. 3, with SAR Systems, LLC, 
for professional services to implement human resources benefits administration system 
and human resources system enhancements, increasing the spending limit by $400,000. 
  
12.  
 Purchase of Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) System Annual Support and Maintenance   
Move City Council approve the purchase of enterprise asset management (EAM) system 
annual support and maintenance, from CentralSquare Technologies, LLC, in an amount not 
to exceed $114,927, for the period of one year, beginning July 1, 2024, through June 30, 
2025. 
  
13.  
 Purchase of Microsoft Software Licenses   
Move City Council approve the purchase of Microsoft software licenses, from CDW-G, 
utilizing the Sourcewell Contract No. 081419-CDW, for a period of three years, in an amount 
not to exceed $2,021,655 in the first year.

Page 4 of 34 
 
 
 
 
Law 
14.  
Settlement in Allstate Insurance Co. vs. City of Chandler   
Move City Council authorize the settlement in the matter of Allstate Insurance Co vs. City of 
Chandler in full and final satisfaction of all claims asserted without admitting liability for the 
amount of $140,000.00 and further authorize the City Attorney to sign any necessary 
documents in such forms as are approved by the City Attorney to effectuate the terms and 
conditions of settlement in this action. 
 
Management Services 
15.   Resolution No. 5790 Authorizing Submittal of an Indian Gaming Revenue Sharing Grant 
Application from Dignity Health Foundation - East Valley to Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation   
Move City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 5790 authorizing the submittal of a 
$25,000 pass-through Indian Gaming Revenue Sharing Grant Application from the Dignity 
Health Foundation – East Valley to the Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation to provide oral health 
care and minimally invasive treatments for 120 children. 
  
16.  
 New License Series 12, Restaurant Liquor License Application for Jared Michael Repinksi, 
Agent, EJG Group II, LLC, DBA Maple House   
Move for recommendation to the State Department of Liquor Licenses and Control for 
approval of the State Liquor Job No. 282818, a Series 12, Restaurant Liquor License, for 
Jared Michael Repinksi, Agent, EJG Group II, LLC, DBA Maple House, located at 198 W. Boston 
Street, and approval of the City of Chandler, Series 12, Restaurant Liquor License No. 
304098. 
 
Neighborhood Resources  
17.  
Introduction and Tentative Adoption of Ordinance No. 5092, Approving a Ground Lease at 
77 North McQueen Road with Villas on McQueen, LLC   
Move City Council introduce and tentatively adopt Ordinance No. 5092, approving a ground 
lease at 77 North McQueen Road with Villas on McQueen, LLC, and authorizing the Mayor 
to sign the lease and the City Manager to sign all related documents. 
  
18.  
Resolution No. 5793 Approving and Authorizing the City Manager to Allocate Fiscal Year 
2024–2025 HOME Investment Partnerships Program Funds   
Move City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 5793 approving and authorizing the City 
Manager or his designee to allocate Fiscal Year 2024-2025 HOME Investment Partnerships 
Program funds; authorizing execution of all contracts and subrecipient agreements; and 
authorizing the City Manager to take all actions necessary and prudent to implement the 
adopted FY 2024-2025 HOME funding allocations.

Page 5 of 34 
 
 
 
19.  
Resolution No. 5792 Approving and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute and Submit 
the Community Development Block Grant Fiscal Year 2024–2025 Annual Action Plan to the 
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development; Authorizing Execution of 
All Subrecipient Contracts   
Move City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 5792 approving and authorizing the City 
Manager or designee to execute and submit the Community Development Block Grant 
Fiscal Year 2024–2025 Annual Action Plan to the United States Department of Housing and 
Urban Development; authorizing execution of all subrecipient contracts; and authorizing 
the City Manager or designee to take all action necessary or prudent to implement the 
approved FY 2024-2025 Annual Action Plan 
 
Police Department 
20.  
 Resolution No. 5794 Acceptance and Approval of a Grant from the Office of the Arizona 
Attorney General Child and Family Advocacy Fund in the amount of $36,437.62 for the 
Chandler Child and Family Advocacy Center   
Move City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 5794 authorizing acceptance and 
approval of a grant from the Office of the Arizona Attorney General Child and Family 
Advocacy Fund in the amount of $36,437.62; and authorizing the Chief of Police, as 
designated by the City Manager, to conduct all negotiations and to execute and submit all 
documents necessary in connection with such grant. 
 
Public Works and Utilities  
21.  
 Introduction and Tentative Adoption of Ordinance No. 5090, Granting a Non-Exclusive 
Underground High Voltage Power Easement to Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement 
and Power District to Accommodate the Development of the Aligned Data Center Facility   
Move City Council introduce and tentatively adopt Ordinance No. 5090 granting a non-
exclusive underground high voltage power easement to SRP, in consideration of the 
payment of four thousand ($4,000) dollars, to accommodate the development of the 
Aligned Data Center facility at Price Road and Continuum Street. 
 
22.  
 Resolution No. 5772 Authorizing the Acquisition of Real Property in Fee or by Easement 
Required for the Price Road Sewer Rehabilitation Project No. WW2302   
Move City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 5772 authorizing the acquisition of real 
property in fee or by easement required for the Price Road Sewer Rehabilitation Project 
WW2302; authorizing the city's real estate administrator to sign, on behalf of the city, the 
purchase agreements, and any other documents necessary to facilitate the acquisitions; 
authorizing eminent domain proceedings as needed to acquire said the real property and 
obtain immediate possession thereof; and authorizing relocation assistance as may be 
required by law.

Page 6 of 34 
 
 
 
 23.  
 Construction Agreement No. ST2007.401, with Action Direct, LLC, dba Redpoint 
Contracting, for the Hamilton Street Improvements from Iris Place to Appleby Road   
Move City Council award Construction Agreement No. ST2007.401, to Action Direct, LLC, 
dba Redpoint Contracting, for the Hamilton Street Improvements from Iris Place to Appleby 
Road, in an amount not to exceed $4,518,727. 
  
24.  
 Agreement No. SW2-100-4480, Amendment No. 2, with Sierra Container Group, LLC, for 
Refuse and Recycling Containers   
Move City Council approve Agreement No. SW2-100-4480, Amendment No. 2, with Sierra 
Container Group, LLC, for refuse and recycling containers, in an amount not to exceed 
$500,000, for the period of one year, beginning May 16, 2024, through May 15, 2025. 
 
Consent Agenda Motion and Vote  
Councilmember Stewart moved to approve the Consent Agenda of the April 18, 2024, Regular City 
Council Meeting; Seconded by Councilmember Ellis.  
 
Motion carried unanimously (7-0). 
  
Action Agenda 
25.  
Introduction and Tentative Adoption of Ordinance No. 5084, Rezoning & Preliminary 
Development Plan, PLH23-0044 QuikTrip Convenience Store and Gas Station, located at 
2000 W. Ray Road, generally located at the northwest corner of Dobson and Ray Roads 
(continued from the meeting of March 21, 2024)   
   
Rezoning 
Move City Council tentatively adopt Ordinance No. 5084 approving PLH23-0044 QuikTrip 
Convenience Store and Gas Station, amending the Planned Area Development (PAD) zoning 
for commercial uses to permit a fuel service station, subject to the conditions as 
recommended by Planning and Zoning Commission. 
 
BENJAMIN CERECERES, PLANNER, presented the following presentation.  
• PLH23-0044 QuikTrip Convenience Store & Gas Station  
• Request 
o Amendment to PAD zoning for commercial uses to permit a fuel service station with 
convenience store 
o Preliminary Development Plan for site layout & building architecture for a fuel station 
with convenience store 
 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART asked about the need for rezoning for fuel and if an ordinance 
previously mandated it.

Page 7 of 34 
 
 
 
MR. CERECERES said that to obtain a fuel service station, you need to either obtain a use permit 
or rezone the property.  
 
MR. CERECERES continued the following slides. 
• Proposal  
o 2.51 net acres 
o 5,312 sq. ft. convenience store  
o 7,287 sq.ft. fuel canopy  
o 8 fuel pumps 
o 30 parking spaces required/50 provided 
• Elevation  
• Neighborhood Outreach 
o Applicant mailed notice to all property owners within 600’ & HOA/RNO’s within ¼ mile  
o Neighborhood meeting held on October 03, 2023 with 25 neighbors in attendance  
o Meeting sign posted on the site and on social media via Nextdoor  
o As of writing this memo, staff is aware of support and opposition to the request 
• 2nd Neighborhood Outreach  
o 2nd Neighborhood meeting held on April 03, 2024 with 20 individuals in attendance  
o Meeting sign posted on the site and on social media via Nextdoor  
o Applicant mailed to all property owners within 600’ & HOA/RNO’s within ¼ mile  
o Concerns: 
 Traffic  
 Safety/crime/transients 
o 7 Individuals spoke in opposition  
o 2 Individuals spoke in support  
• Neighborhood Input  
o Potential transients, increase in crime and traffic  
o Opposition  
 39 Confirmed Chandler Homes  
 2 Business’s 
 8 No Address/County  
 49 Total Emails/Letter  
o Support  
 16 Confirmed Chandler Homes 
 14 Business’s 
 10 No Address/County  
 65 Total Emails/Letters 
• Petition – Opposition 
o Three petitions provided opposing the request  
o Online Petition (Change.org): 
 44 stated Chandler Homes

Page 8 of 34 
 
 
 
 52 non-Chandler Homes  
 1 no city provided  
 97 total signatures  
o Written Petition  
 214 confirmed Chandler Homes  
 78 non-Chandler Homes 
 109 no address provided  
 401 total Signatures  
 Petition (Provided April 17, 2024): 
33 Chandler Homes 
 291 total chandler homes – Opposed 
• Petition – Support  
o One Petition provided supporting the request  
o Written Petition  
 483 confirmed Chandler Homes  
 920 non-Chandler Homes  
 43 no Address Provided  
 811 Not Finish Confirming  
 2,257 total signatures 
o 483 confirmed Chandler Homes – Support  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked who is the most impacted, who supports, and who opposes 
as opposed to someone just living in Chandler.  
 
MR. CERECERES said we did not discuss how closely the properties are aligned regarding support 
or opposition. 
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO said it explains why we received many emails from people who just 
stated whether they supported or opposed it. We need to consider this. 
 
MR. CERECERES continued the following slides. 
• P&Z Commission Recommendation  
• Motion to approve: 
o In Favor: 4 
o Opposed: 1(Heumann) 
 Increased traffic concern  
o Absent: 2 (Lopex & Barichello) 
o Enhancements 
 Pedestrian path off Dobson  
 Increase tree size  
• Staff Recommendation

Page 9 of 34 
 
 
 
o Consistent with General Plan  
o Zoning Code standards met (setbacks, lot coverage, parking, etc.) 
o P&Z recommends approval  
 
MAYOR HARTKE asked about the traffic improvements and their goals. Was a staff member 
assigned to address this, or was it discussed with QT.   
 
MR. CERECERES said our traffic engineer is available to answer questions about the CIP project. 
The applicant should present their case to address the residents' traffic concerns.  
 
MAYOR HARTKE said the concern is about crime at gas stations, particularly QT. Is there data 
supporting claims that QT stations are more crime-prone than other brands? He also wants 
general information about gas stations, such as their quantity and locations.  
 
MR. CERECERES said the applicant would be better equipped to answer questions about how they 
handle transients and any potential concerns about crime on the property.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ELLIS asked what the vote at the planning and zoning commission was.  
 
MR. CERECERES said the vote passed in Planning and Zoning Commission by majority, 4-1.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART asked for feedback on transit and crime at different gas stations in 
the Chandler Market.  
 
MELISSA DEANDA, Acting Police Chief, said the police department reviewed calls for service at four 
Quick Trip locations in Chandler, Arizona, from March 5th, 2023, to March 5th, 2024. We separated 
the calls into criminal and non-criminal. Criminal offenses included theft, trespassing, disorderly 
conduct, and warrant arrests. Non-criminal events included vehicle lockouts, traffic accidents, 
public information, or potentially suspicious activity that did not result in anything criminal-
related. All three convenience stores we reviewed had similar criminal calls for service. However, 
Quick Trip had more non-criminal calls for service than the other two locations. The reasons for 
this could be non-criminal related. 
 
MAYOR HARTKE asked why, for the sake of argument, these three were chosen at random. He 
saw one of each. 
 
CHIEF DEANDA said she choose this location because Ray and Dobson are where Quick Trip 
intends to expand. These are three convenience store locations within that area with similar crime 
rates.

Page 10 of 34 
 
 
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked about the reasons for the call for service in these three areas, 
other than crime.  
 
CHIEF DEANDA said there were 128 calls for service at Arizona Ave and Warner, 39 of which were 
criminal and 89 non-criminal. At the Chevron located at Dobson and Ray, there were 55 calls for 
service, 37 of which were criminal and 18 of which were non-criminal. Similarly, at Circle K, located 
at Alma School and Knox, there were 95 calls for service, 38 of which were criminal and 57 non-
criminal.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART said the neighbors are worried about the increasing crime rate 
around the gas stations and convenience stores. They fear this crime may spill over into the 
neighborhoods, leading to more traffic and unwanted visitors. Is there any data available on the 
incidents in these areas. 
 
CHIEF DEANDA said she did not have any specific heat map-related information for extended calls 
for service outside of the Quick Trip, and could not speak accurately about that right now.  
 
VICE MAYOR HARRIS asked how people navigate the community and approach gas stations is 
interested in understanding the typical behaviors of drivers looking for gas.  
 
CHIEF DEANDA said convenience stores are extremely popular in Chandler and any city. People 
need to fuel up, and they need the convenience of food and drink inside. Convenience stores 
generate a lot of business, and you will see increased traffic throughout the city because of an 
essential need.  
 
VICE MAYOR HARRIS asked whether gas stations or QTs are considered as destinations. Do they 
attract heavy traffic, or are they just serving the local community. Are they more focused on 
serving the area they are in or are they a popular destination spot that people travel to.  
 
JOSHUA WRIGHT, City Manager, answered Vice Mayor Harris's question, suggesting that it might 
be best to direct the inquiry to the traffic engineering team. He explained that the topic seemed 
more related to driver behavior than the criminal aspect.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER POSTON asked about the unhoused population and if the assistant had any 
information on the matter. They were concerned about the possibility of attracting more people.  
 
CHIEF DEANDA said she would defer to Leah Powell, Neighborhood Resources Director, for that 
information.  
 
LEAH POWELL, Neighborhood Resources Director, said they investigated the convenience stores 
and Quick Trip in Chandler city. The Homeless Management Information System did not provide

Page 11 of 34 
 
 
 
specific addresses, only geographic locations. The investigation revealed no correlation between 
an increase in homelessness and Quick Trip. One individual accounted for most interactions with 
The Navigators, living in an alley behind another business. The QT location covering Queen Creek 
had zero interactions with Navigators over two years, while the Arizona and Warner locations had 
the highest number of interactions, with one individual accounting for about 20 of them.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER POSTON asked if it seemed to be an attraction because it is a convenience store 
or because of its location.  
 
MS. POWELL said the location is more relevant than Quick Trip since there is no specific 
connection, even after reviewing case notes and heat maps. The information pertains to the 
general area.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ELLIS asked about comparing a heat map with a hypothetical one on Arizona 
and Fry. They were curious to know how the numbers on both maps would compare. 
 
MS. POWELL said that due to the way HMIS data is collected, it is difficult to attribute certain data 
points specifically to the convenience center. In fact, their address appears to be in the same 
location as the convenience center on the heat map, leading to confusion among individuals 
seeking services. This skews the numbers for that location, and unfortunately, it is impossible to 
isolate data for that specific business due to this issue.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ELLIS said the proposed location may attract more homeless individuals, 
despite efforts to address homelessness in the area.  
 
MS. POWELL said there is no evidence to suggest a connection between an increased number of 
homeless people and the Quick Trip intersection in question. Rather, most calls they receive are 
related to a group of well-known panhandlers who travel around the valley, stopping at various 
locations to solicit money. These panhandlers are not actually homeless but portray themselves 
as such. They frequent the Quick Trip intersection and nearby locations such as the Chevron and 
Frye.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ELLIS said regardless of whether someone is across the street at Chevron or at 
Fry, their location would be accurately registered on that corner.  
 
MS. POWELL said that is correct. 
 
MAYOR HARTKE said the heat map of the Arizona Corridor appears to be stronger in areas with 
more services, such as the Salvation Army, the city, and others. He mentioned that it makes sense 
for people to receive calls in those areas. However, he also noted that it would be difficult to 
pinpoint any specific store or gas station that becomes a magnet for calls based on the map alone.

Page 12 of 34 
 
 
 
The only clear clusters are downtown Arizona Avenue and the West Chandler area close to the 
freeway.   
 
MS. POWELL said there is no evidence to suggest that any specific convenience store is more of a 
magnet for people experiencing homelessness than any other location. On the west side, the issue 
is spread throughout some of the hotels, convenience stores, other businesses in the area, and 
vacant properties in the industrial area. It is worth noting that every time the navigation team 
interacts with someone and can identify them, the incident gets logged in the HMIS system, even 
if the person does not provide any identifying information.  
 
BRIAN GREATHOUSE, Attorney, Burch & Cracchiolo Law Firm, presented the following.   
• QuikTrip 
• NWC Ray Road & Dobson Road  
• What’s Happened Since March 21st  
• Follow-up Neighborhood Meeting: 4/3/2024, 420+ invites sent, 20+ attendees 
o Heard and addressed concerns regarding traffic safety  
o Head support and excitement for the new QT store 
• In-Person Outreach:  Significant outreach to both businesses and residents 
o Heard an outpouring of support  
o 1,359 individually signed letters of support from Chandler residents 
o 898 individually signed letters of support from others who live in the surrounding area  
o 14 letters of support from businesses located at the Ray & Dobson intersection  
 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART asked to see one of the form letters and one from the businesses 
that signed it.  
 
MR. GREATHOUSE continued the following slides 
• Community Support 
• Supporting Businesses  
• Proposed QT Development  
• Perspective from Ray Road 
• Perspective from Dobson/Ray Intersection  
• Perspective from Dobson Road  
• Existing Zoning and Permitted Uses  
• Existing Zoning & Proposal   
o Zoned PAD in 1998 for Community Commercial (C-2) uses. 
o 17,042 sf Osco Drugstore & 50,682 sf of commercial uses.  
o Vacant Osco building is on Site, inviting potential vagrancy  
o The site will develop at some point and create impacts to the area 
o OT is proposing a sustainable solution on this infill redevelopment site  
• Several of the following C_2 Permitted Uses could be built on site:

Page 13 of 34 
 
 
 
o Fast food Restaurants with drive-thrus 
o Retail 
o Convenience market (e.g. 7-Eleven, Joe’s Mini Market etc.) 
• Why are we requesting a PAD Amendment?  
o 8 fuel stations, the same number as Chevron across the street  
• Common Concerns  
• Traffic  
• Safety  
 
JAMIE BLAKEMAN, Traffic Engineer, Lokahi Engineering, presented the following slides. 
• QT Trip Generation  
• 4,100 QT Trips per day  
• 3,100 pass-by trips per day  
• 1,000 new trips per day  
• Dobson Road  
o 11,800 Trips per day  
o 1,100 Trips per day QT  
• Ray Road  
o 20,900 Trips per day  
o 2,000 Trips per day QT  
• New Trips to the Ray Rd & Dobson Rd Area 
o Employees  
o Supplies & Product Deliveries  
• Pharmacy/Drugstore with Drive-Thrus  
o 27% Fewer Trips Overall  
• Fast-Food with Drive-thru 
o 17%Fewer Trips Overall  
• Fast-Food without Drive-Thru  
o 55% Fewer Trips  
• Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Thru  
o 62% Fewer Trips  
• Dobson Road with Proposed Development  
o Total Capacity: 36,300 VPD  
o Available Capacity 32.0% 
o QuikTrip New Trips 1,100 VPD 24,700 3.0% 
o Background Traffic: 23,600 VPD 65.0% 
o Total Capacity: 36,300 VPD  
• Ray Road with Proposed Development  
o Total Capacity: 54,800 VPD  
o Available Capacity 21.7% 
o QuikTrip New Trips: 1,100 VPD 42,900 2.0%

Page 14 of 34 
 
 
 
o Background traffic: 41,800 VPD 76.3% 
o Total Capacity: 54,800 VPD  
• Access 
o All access points existing  
o No changes to driveway locations or existing traffic patterns  
o Existing cross-access agreement  
• Dobson Capital Improvement Project  
o New median on Dobson Road  
o Dual left turn lanes  
o Protected “Left Turns” 
o Right turn lanes  
o Bike lanes  
o CIP is full funded 
• Ray Road & Dobson Road Crash Data 2021-2022 
o Potentially correctable with CIP Improvements  
 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART asked Joshua Wright, City Manager, about the timeline for that 
intersection blowout.  
 
JOSHUA WRIGHT, City Manager, said Federal funding for construction in 2026 was available. As 
Ms. Blakeman mentioned, the project was previously approved under contract and is currently in 
the design phase.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART said it is already in the process of improving.  
 
MR. WRIGHT said correct. 
 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART asked about the project timeline and how far it had gone. 
 
MR. WRIGHT said he does not know the Quick Trip construction timeline. The applicant can answer 
that if approved. Our project starts in 2026 when funding is available.  
 
Council Member Stewart said we are scheduled to turn the light on in 2026. However, if this 
proposal passes, it will happen sooner.  
 
MR. GREATHOUSE said QT anticipates opening the door in approximately 18 months, which would 
be the end of 2025.  
 
MAYOR HARTKE asked how someone would get into QT if they were heading east on Ray Rd.  
 
MS. BLAKEMAN continued the slides

Page 15 of 34 
 
 
 
• Characteristics of Gas Stations  
o OT likely to serve SB & WB 
o Chevron likely to serve NB & EB  
 
MAYOR HARTKE said there are alternate routes for travelers, advising a left and right turn for those 
heading north and south. These routes are convenient for three out of four directions.  
 
MAYOR HARTKE asked how the data for other stores was collected and whether it was based on 
traffic or proximity. How did Circle K calculate the numbers for this intersection compared to QT.     
 
MS. BLAKEMAN said we calculate trips using National formula data points. These data points are 
graphs of convenience stores and gas stations plotted across the US. They undergo a long vetting 
process to determine formulas, including size, trips, and best-fitted curves. This method is widely 
accepted and the only one we use.  
 
MAYOR HARTKE asked for clarification on the data points, specifically if they were based on the 
actual number of trips and if they were specific to a particular area. He was trying to apply the 
data to a specific intersection.  
 
MS. BLAKEMAN said the data analysis uses averages instead of considering the specific area. 
However, we have minimums and maximums to determine where the data points fall. We use the 
best-fitted curve to analyze the data.  
 
MAYOR HARTKE asked if the same data points would apply to smaller or denser areas than this 
one. He felt the data might be skewed and wanted to know how it would apply to a town of 287,000 
like this one.  
 
MS. BLAKEMAN said that when dealing with rural areas with limited population, they rely on 
minimums or maximums or look at outline data points. In more walkable areas, they may factor 
that in as well. However, this is just the starting point. The calculations, formula, and methodology 
used for the quick trip are the same as those used for fast food and all other calculations. No 
reductions or inflations were made.  
 
MAYOR HARTKE said those may or may not be accurate numbers.  
 
MS. BLAKEMAN said they are approximations. This gives us a magnitude. Now, these individuals 
and humans choose to turn left and right on a given day. They certainly are your approximations.  
 
MAYOR HARTKE compared the numbers, but they may vary depending on the location. In some 
rural areas, there may be only 10 cars passing by, whereas in an urban area, there could be 12 
cars going to a donut place.

Page 16 of 34 
 
 
 
 
MS. BLAKEMAN said certain numbers would be used in calculations. For example, if a company 
like QuikTrip could not generate 4,000 trips due to not having 4,000 people available, factors could 
be applied to reduce that number. The idea is to consider each situation's unique circumstances 
and adjust the calculations accordingly.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ENCINAS asked if the newest QT here in Chandler on Chandler Boulevard and 
McQueen were compared to the comparisons made prior to that being built and the new numbers 
now with that being built and the traffic, whether the numbers increased or decreased, or stayed 
the same.  
 
MR. GREATHOUSE presented the following slide. 
• Chandler Blvd & McQueen Rd – Real Life Case Study  
• 2022 – Before QT  
o 52,800 vpd 
• 2023 – Post QT  
o 53,375 vpd 
o +575 vpd (1.09%) 
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked what the averages were looking at the data.  
 
MS. BLAKEMAN said the average numbers are weekday volumes over the course of the day.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO said he would like to double-check the average numbers.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ELLIS asked if a traffic engineer was present and requested traffic flow 
information for a specific corner, including the number of people stopping at QT versus those 
driving past Chevron or towards the East, West, North, or South. 
 
RAYMOND HUANG, Senior Engineer, said the pass-by number is the number we get from the 
national manual. In general, we do not specify what gas station, whether a QT or Chevron; they 
just specify if there are gas stations. This is the pass-by number they will use and the number that 
just shows on the screen for the new gas stations and new QT on Chandler Blvd and McQueen; 
those are the accurate numbers we collect data.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ELLIS asked about the study findings regarding the placement of a QT gas 
station across from Chevron. How will the road's capacity handle traffic and would the presence 
of a stop impede traffic flow.

Page 17 of 34 
 
 
 
MR. HUANG said that traffic at Ray and Dobson remains unchanged. After the CIP project, a 
median on Dobson will restrict left turns in the northbound direction, resulting in fewer 
movements on that leg. The pass-by traffic percentage remains the same at both locations.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked significantly on these 575 new trips, are we tying that to the 
QT.  It is only less than a year or about a year. 
 
MR. HUANG said they put a counter on each of the four legs and counted the total number, but 
we do not know whether they go into quick trips.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked if there had been significant housing construction in that area.  
 
MR. HUANG said we no.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked if there had been any new business in that area.  
 
MR. HUANG said no.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO said we really have not had any major build-up since the QT.  
 
MR. HUANG said correct.  
 
MAYOR HARTKE asked if traffic would change between 2022 and 2023 due to the pandemic. Would 
we have fully recovered, or would the effects still be felt. Would the roads return to usual capacity, 
or would more people be working from home affect traffic. Have you noticed any changes that 
could affect this. 
 
MR. HUANG said we saw a significant decrease in 2020 and 2021, and while 2022 is almost back 
to pre-pandemic levels, it is not quite there yet.  
 
MAYOR HARTKE said it is hard to tell which location you are referring to since QT and Andes are 
almost equidistant from the freeway. However, it does not seem to be a big issue.  
 
MR. HUANG said correct.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ENCINAS asked about a future CIP project and the median on Ray Rd. Will it 
stay open or become solid. There is an entry point to turn left into the Tutor Time area, so the 
Councilmember wondered how much that will be used as an access point for people heading east. 
He also asked if the CIP project is still happening and if it will affect the median.  
 
MR. HUANG said that access would remain, but the CIP budget would not touch that access.

Page 18 of 34 
 
 
 
 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART asked if the bus barn will be moved or will remain.  
 
MR. HUANG said the bus barn will remain in the same proximity location with a pull-in.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART suggested relocating the bus stop to prevent collisions with cars 
trying to pull into the QT.  
 
MR. HUANG clarified the bus space is south of Ray Road and asked if that was the one he referred 
to.   
 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART said he referred to Google Maps and a bus stop on an earlier slide.  
 
MR. HUANG said they will need a deceleration lane for a Quick Trip that will be shared with a bus. 
Like other shared routes, if a bus is present, it will use the lane, while cars can go around it.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART said that moving the bus location is not an option.  
 
MR. HUANG said at this point, no.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART asked if it would make sense to do that if this were approved.  
 
MR. HUANG said that could be determined by the team. 
 
MR. GREATHOUSE continued the following slides.  
• Security & Safety – Policies & Training  
o QT Policy: Friendly, Fair, Firm  
o Staff is trained to prevent and deal with issues such as loitering and theft 
o Strict positions on alcohol and tobacco sales  
o OT coordinates regularly with local police  
o Store are designated as Safe Places for At-Risk Youth through partnership with Safe 
Place (https://www.nationalsafeplace.org/) 
• Security & Safety – Security Cameras  
• Security & Safety -CPTED  
• QT designs the Site using Chandler PD’s Crime Prevention through Environment Design 
(CPTED) 
o Natural Access Control – Controlling and reducing the number of access points, e.g., 
gates 
o Natural Surveillance – intended users can observe the property, e.g., lighting 
o Territorial Reinforcement – clear delineation of space and separates your space from 
non-legitimate users

Page 19 of 34 
 
 
 
o Activity Support – placing activity where individuals become part of the natural 
surveillance  
o Maintenance – regularly scheduled maintenance 
 
VICE MAYOR HARRIS asked if the police have access to CCTV feeds for real-time crime capture. Is 
this part of their coordination with the cameras during emergencies. 
 
DANIEL CHAMBERS, QuikTrip, said they partner regularly with local police departments and have 
a dedicated team that interfaces with police and provides camera footage for investigations. 
 
VICE MAYOR HARRIS asked if police could access surveillance footage in real time. Is there a way 
to tap into the feed directly instead of showing up and going through the process.  
 
MR. CHAMBERS said he is unsure if they have ever given someone direct access to their cameras. 
He stated that they have live access to the cameras but have never shared it or had a way for 
others to tap into their system.  
 
MAYOR HARTKE thought they should take a real look at the possibility of a real-time crime center, 
it might be an ask or a possibility in the future, He knew they were not there yet.  
 
MR. GREATHOUSE continued the following slides. 
• Schools  
o Met with Seton Catholic, no further concerns and no objections  
o Discussion with Tutor Time. We’ve offered the following  
o Add wayfinding signage  
o Add no parking signage  
o Add speed bumps on TT site  
o Provide additional lighting around TT dumpster  
 
MAYOR HARTKE asked if Tutor Time had confirmed that their concerns had been met. He said 
they have made statements about Seton, but asked what Tutor Time was saying. Have they met 
their concerns as well.  
 
MR. CHAMBERS said he spoke with Ashley Teague, the general manager of Tutor Time. They 
discussed adding speed bumps and a light at the dumpster to address her concerns. As a result, 
they will implement these changes during the building of the Quick Trip for Tutor Time.  
 
• Why QT?  
o High-end, Best-in-Class, reputable company  
o More than just a place to get fuel: freshly made food from Kitchen, specialty coffees, ice 
teas, smoothies, ice cream, etc.

Page 20 of 34 
 
 
 
o Job creation: Will employ dozens of workers  
o Will provide significant sales tax revenues to the City of Chandler  
o Will make good use of this infill redevelopment site  
o Low traffic generating use compared to many other permitted commercial uses 
(multiple fast food drive-thrus and/or convenience markets) 
• Request City Council’s Approval in Accordance with Planning Commission and Staff’s 
Recommendations 
• And the 1,359 Letters of Support from Chandler Residents & 14 Neighboring Business Owners 
 
VICE MAYOR HARRIS said he wanted to let the council members know he reached out to the 
principal at Seton Catholic, who supports it.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART asked about the concessions, but he did not see their support letter. 
Is that correct.  
 
MR. GREATHOUSE said he knew of no actual support letter or anything in writing stating their 
support. 
 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART asked if they offered any reason, they did not want to do that.  
 
MR. CHAMBERS said they did not discuss obtaining a support letter. They sought to be a good 
neighbor, understand concerns, and establish a long-term relationship. They were not seeking a 
support letter. During the communication, she brought up the items and kept them in the loop by 
copying him in all the communication. We did this to maintain transparency throughout the 
process with the city. 
  
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked if this is approved, will they put that as a stipulation to work 
with Tutor Time.  
 
MR. GREATHOUSE said they would be happy to accept the stipulation if necessary, and they have 
spoken with Kevin Mayo about that.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO requested that any motion to approve the matter at hand should 
include the stipulations discussed. He emphasized that the promises made on the presentation 
slide should be legally binding. Thus, if a motion is made, it should be in writing and address Tutor 
Times' concerns.  
 
MAYOR HARTKE asked if the process could be explained in more detail to ensure that there would 
be someone available to address any concerns or complaints about zoning immediately. It is 
important to make sure that the area is safe for children and other neighbors and that there is

Page 21 of 34 
 
 
 
assurance that any issues will be addressed promptly. Is it correct to assume that someone in 
charge is responsible for addressing complaints and concerns.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO said they have four things they will work with Tutor Time on and 
make sure the motion maker in the second adds that stipulation that they will do those four things 
for Tutor Time to time so that our staff if they are not being done, could then work with you to 
make sure they are done.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ENCINAS asked if the letters of support were from the businesses. Are these 
the business owners, is it management, is it just an employee. He did not know who signed these 
letters.  
 
MR. GREATHOUSE offered to bring up the individual who obtained the signature. He also 
mentioned that a business card is stapled to the support letter.  
 
• CIP Project  
o Dobson & Ray widening  
 Federal safety funds for dual left turn lanes on all approaches  
 Raised median on north leg that eliminates northbound left-turns to/from 
proposed development  
o Timeline 
 2023: Council approved design contract on 9/18/23 
 2024: design and public outreach (30% design)  
 2025: utility relocation  
 2026: construction and public outreach (anticipated start in late 2025 or early 
2026) 
• QY Comparison  
• McQueen & Chandler QuikTrip  
• Intersection Volumes  
o 2022: 52,800 vpd 
o 2023: 53,375 vpd 
o Difference: +575 vpd  
• Traffic Concerns 
o Traffic statement provided by the applicant and reviewed by City Traffic Engineer, who 
agrees with the findings 
o Amount of traffic added by proposed development  
 Trips generated: 4,114 
 Pass-by trips: 3,100 
 Net new trips: 1,014 
o Intersection Volumes  
 2023: 64,600 vpd

Page 22 of 34 
 
 
 
 New trip = 1.5% increase 
• Traffic Concerns  
o Dobson & Ray Intersection  
 #71 on latest (November 2023) MAG Crash Risk List  
 City applied for federal safety grant in May 2022 (awarded in February 2023) 
 Council advanced City funds in 2024-2033 CIP budget to coincide with federal 
safety funding 
o U-turns are common at arterial intersections and No U-Turn signs can be posted, if 
necessary  
• Table 1 – Trip Generation (Proposed Development) 
• Table 3 – Trip Generation – Potential Development Under Existing Zoning  
• Tabel 4 – Trip Generation Comparison (Proposed and Existing Development vs. Previous 
Zoning Case Development)  
 
DAVID MILLER 1989 W. Ray Road., Chandler AZ, spoke in opposition to the proposed rezoning of 
the northwest corner of Dobson and Ray, which would allow Quick Trip to build a large corporate 
gas station. He strongly objected to the rezoning, stating that it would endanger the safety of 
children attending nearby schools and those living there. He highlighted the high traffic volume in 
the area, the dangers of peak traffic periods, and the potential for accidents. He also mentioned 
Quick Trip's consultant's flawed and incomplete traffic study. Lastly, he urged the decision-makers 
to carefully consider arguments against this development and prioritize the community's safety 
and well-being. 
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked about parts two and three.  
 
MR. MILLER found out that the TIS study was incomplete with only one-third of it being done. The 
second and third parts of the study were not completed, which included estimating peak hours' 
directional movements and trip distribution. The report was accepted by the city staff despite its 
incompleteness. Completing the study requires special traffic capacity software to estimate the 
traffic carrying capacity at the signalized intersection, which is standard for all public agencies.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO said we will get with our staff to review the second and third, but he 
wanted to explore that further.  
 
MAYOR HARTKE asked Mr. Miller if there were other things he would like to discuss. 
 
MR. MILLER emphasized the importance of using the Tutor Time parking lot for drop-offs and pick-
ups. It also discusses crime statistics, mentioning that gas stations are a common location for 
violent crime, and Quick Trip is the busiest gas station in the world. A customer reported spending 
over 100 hours in a Quick Trip parking lot and seeing unprecedented traffic. The notes also state

Page 23 of 34 
 
 
 
that Quick Trip is the second busiest gas station after Costco. Finally, the text refutes the claim 
that the project will not generate any more traffic than what was previously approved.  
 
VICE MAYOR HARRIS asked for more information on traffic flow, accidents, and related data to 
make a well-informed decision. He emphasized the importance of not dismissing any information 
and ensuring that all questions regarding traffic are answered. 
 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART asked if the neighbors all paid for a traffic study.  
 
MR. MILLER said no, but he paid for the traffic study as a Chevron business owner.  
 
VICE MAYOR HARRIS asked staff to further clarify the business owners' concerns.  
 
MR. HUANG said a traffic study is usually required for sites that generate significant traffic. 
However, no traffic study was required since the proposed QT generates less traffic than the 
existing site. They provided a traffic statement that exceeded our requirements, so no further 
parts are needed.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART asked if their report about the gas station concerns you.  
 
MR. HUANG said he had not seen the report and was only reviewing the applicant's traffic 
statement.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART said he is interested in seeing the report on Chevron's impact and 
any similar issues they may be causing. 
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked Mr. Huang if he had seen the report.  
 
MR. HUANG said no, we have not.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked about the meaning of parts two and three and whether they 
are related to disaster and wants to understand the gentleman's perspective.  
 
MR. HUANG discussed the three-part analysis of a new project's impact: estimating new trips 
generated, determining their origin, and assessing any negative impact on lower-level services. 
The median on Ray Road and Dobson will restrict movement, resulting in most new trips coming 
from the south and west. Further examination is required to confirm this.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked whether parts two and three concerned them. Once the road 
improvements are made, both concerns will be addressed.

Page 24 of 34 
 
 
 
MR. HUANG said that the new site has generated more traffic, and it is not necessary to subtract 
the passes by two or three.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked if there were concerns that parts two and three were not done 
or overlooked. 
 
MR. HUANG said the report we received does not seem to have a negative impact on the existing 
infrastructure.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO said assuming we know what parts two and three refer to, will the 
improvements we make in 2026 alleviate some of the concerns raised by the gentleman. 
 
MR. HUANG said that the traffic flow would be restricted after the improvement. Currently, there 
is a free flow from Dobson Road going northbound, but you cannot make a left turn after the 
improvement. 
 
COUNCILMEMBER ELLIS expressed gratitude for the explanation of the current situation. 
Additionally, Chevron is reducing traffic by stopping to get gas.  
 
VICE MAYOR HARRIS expressed concerns about a busy intersection with multiple traffic accidents 
and suggested addressing this issue later. Vice Mayor Harris inquired about the Police 
Department's approach and whether there are additional patrols in the area to improve traffic 
navigation. 
 
MAYOR HARTKE suggested that the council members write down their questions and discuss 
them before voting. The police and other relevant questions should be asked immediately. 
Residents can share their thoughts before the council members discuss everything and make any 
decisions.  
 
JEFF LANG, 2338 W. Orchid Lane., Chandler, AZ, spoke in opposition. The speaker is against 
constructing a QT gas station in the neighborhood. They argue that the gas station will not be a 
safe haven for children and will negatively impact small local businesses. Additionally, they 
suggest that QT has a history of anti-labor policies and profits from the sale of tobacco and alcohol. 
Instead, they propose building something that would benefit the community, such as a sports 
academy. 
 
FRED BORNS, 6 S. Stellar Pkwy., Chandler, AZ, spoke in opposition. A resident of Chandler 
expresses concern about a proposed QT store with a mini market aspect being built on a 
commercial property. They raise concerns about the impact of traffic on the store, which they 
believe may be greater than the traffic studies suggest. They also note that the store's location 
near three schools, including a closed campus, may attract students and create safety concerns.

Page 25 of 34 
 
 
 
If the store were located near a different type of school, there would likely be more opposition to 
the proposal. 
 
DARRIN NAUGHTON, 1602 W. Del Rio St., Chandler, AZ, spoke in opposition. Mr. Naughton and his 
family have lived in Chandler, Arizona, for 30 years and are homeowners in the Anderson Springs 
Community. They do not favor the proposed rezoning for the Quick Trip (QT) convenience store. 
Although they understand the convenience factor, they are concerned about QT's corporate 
responsibility and sustainability efforts, or lack thereof. The author questions what value QT 
brings to Chandler and whether the economic benefits outweigh the environmental impact. They 
raise questions about QT's waste generation, recycling efforts, renewable energy usage, and 
adoption of electric vehicles. They believe the city council should prioritize the city's and its 
residents' environmental needs over the QT's tax revenues. 
 
AUDREY EATON, 1848 W. Orchid Ln., Chandler Az, spoke in opposition. I oppose the QT application 
for a new convenience store with a gas station in their community. Several reasons for their 
opposition include increased traffic, safety concerns, and the potential for increased criminal 
activity. They collected signatures from 75% of their neighbors who opposed the QT and 
expressed concerns about the legitimacy of the signatures collected in support of the QT at other 
locations. Ms. Eaton calls on city officials to scrutinize the petitions and make a decision that will 
safeguard their community. 
 
CHRIS KREJOVICS, 2110 W. Knox Rd., Chandler, AZ, spoke in opposition. Mr. Krejovics thought it 
was fundamentally flawed because the distance of the area was far too small, and the initial 
neighborhood input was inadequate. I did not know about it until recently, and he expressed his 
concern about the signatures gathered for people who wanted to approve it. He also argued that 
the proposed site was not needed, and there were already difficulties in accessing the Chevron 
gas station. Mr. Krejovics questioned how they could allow building a QT there without deciding 
the exact design that would be chosen for the intersection in all directions. Mr. Krejovics believes 
that the intersection had issues already, and accidents occurred frequently. 
 
APRIL BOURQUIN, 1255 N. Arizona Ave. Apt#1039, Chandler, AZ, spoke in support. I personally 
support the idea of having a gas station. I do not believe in punishing any company based on its 
building decisions. While I understand the community's concerns, I also consider the traffic flow. 
Easy access to the station is much better than having to make U-turns, which can cause more 
traffic. 
 
ERIKA DIAL, 2012 W. Tyson., Chandler AZ, spoke in support. My husband and I support this 
proposal, as do many of our neighbors and local businesses. We have witnessed a lot of support 
for it, despite only the vocal minority being present to complain. The traffic studies have already 
been addressed by the zoning and planning commission, and signs about the proposed site have 
been up since October. QT gathered many signatures, indicating the need for more gas stations

Page 26 of 34 
 
 
 
due to the influx of people from new apartment buildings and construction. Costco is also looking 
at expanding its gas station, further demonstrating the need. The owner of Chevron is leading the 
opposition, but he does not reside in the area. Finally, this is not a new development but a 
proposal for a gas pad, which does not require a full traffic study. 
 
PHILL BUTLER, 1989 W. Ray Rd., Chandler, AZ, spoke in opposition. Gas stations are often targeted 
by panhandlers, drug dealers, and other criminal activities. This can be a potential danger for 
children and high schoolers who visit the nearby daycare and school. While large gas station 
chains like QT seem to allow these people to do whatever they want, our station is very proactive 
in removing them. We respond immediately to any such complaints. QT has made misleading 
statements regarding the concerns of residents and businesses in this neighborhood. They claim 
that there will be less traffic than the original plan written 25 years ago, which is untrue. The fact 
is that there will be more traffic, more accidents, more crime, and more closed-down businesses 
that always seem to follow new QT stations wherever they are built. 
 
GRACE McMAHON, 1560 W. Ironwood Dr., Chandler, AZ, spoke in support. I am a resident of 
Chandler, and I support the proposed new business in the area. I have witnessed the empty 
building at the corner being built and rebuilt multiple times, and I believe it is time for a change. 
The new business is a tried-and-true solution to the problem of the empty building, and I do not 
see any serious traffic issues with it. While the intersection it is going to be in is currently 
problematic, it is already planned to be upgraded, and the new business will not worsen the 
situation. I am in favor of the new business. 
 
PEG INDRELUNAS, 1630 W. Ironwood Dr., Chandler, AZ, spoke in support. I am tired of the corner 
not having a successful business. It used to be a CVS, then two pet stores, and now it looks bad as 
it is boarded up, and the landscaping is not well-maintained. I became aware of this because 
someone posted flyers on my door and all the doors in our neighborhood about our various 
meetings. We discussed some of the concerns, such as the traffic, as it is a bad intersection. 
However, I do not think it will make it any worse because people will go to QT if they are going 
west on Ray or if they are coming south on Dobson, and they will go to Chevron in the other 
direction. Regarding the kids and Tutor Time, I think Tutor Time parents may like the Quick Trip 
right there because they can easily go there for their morning coffee or snacks. For myself, I like 
to go there for a Diet Pepsi. As for the kids from Seton, I think it would be better for them. After 
school, I see so many high school kids walking down Dobson, and if they want a snack, they either 
must cross Dobson to get to Frys or Ray to get to Chevron. Here, they can just walk on the sidewalk 
to the QT and enjoy themselves. Another issue was possible homelessness, as we have homeless 
people in Chandler. I have seen people live behind Sprouts in Anderson Springs, and during 
COVID, we had a woman living in that bus stop at Ray and Pennington for several months. 
However, I have not seen any homeless people at Chevron, and I do not think I will see any at 
Quick Trip. Overall, I support the idea of having a prosperous business there.

Page 27 of 34 
 
 
 
TRISTEN GRESH, 2141 N. Evergreen St., Chandler, AZ, spoke in opposition. I have been residing in 
Chandler for approximately nine years and have worked at Chevron for the past eight years. 
During this time, I have observed how risky the intersection can get. I often see many students 
crossing the street and am deeply concerned about their safety. I hope that the proposed addition 
of QT in the area does not worsen the situation and that the student's safety is not compromised. 
 
TYLER GRESH, 2141 N. Evergreen St., Chandler, AZ, spoke in opposition. Keeping it simple, I do not 
favor having a QT at this location due to the stated reasons and concerns of the community. There 
are several other options that can benefit the community and work better with the school and 
daycare. The presence of a QT would result in increased traffic for the Tuto Time buses, parent 
traffic, and children coming in and out, which raises safety concerns. Overall, I believe that having 
a QT at this location is not a safe option. 
 
JUSTIN WITT, 1560 W. Ironwood Dr., Chandler, AZ, spoke in support. I believe that the QT should 
be built on the corner of Dobson and the intersection. It would be beneficial for the city, 
community, and my neighborhood as the location has been vacant for a long time. If other 
businesses could have worked there, they would have already established their presence. QT 
believes it can make it work, and I commend them for it. The intersection's reconstruction will 
include median barriers to regulate the traffic flow, and there will be red light cameras to capture 
any illegal activities, such as running red lights. I think the Chevron owner, who was the first 
presenter, is apprehensive about competition as he has monopolized that intersection. Overall, I 
believe that this development is going to be beneficial for the community and my neighborhood. 
 
GRETCHEN RENNBAUM, 1762 W. Gary Dr., Chandler, AZ, spoke in opposition. I believe there has 
been a gap in the area for some time now, and this gap needs to be filled thoughtfully and with 
independent research. I find it interesting that many of the staff involved are related to Quick Trip 
rather than other businesses like Circle K, and important aspects such as criminal statistics, 
homelessness, and crime have not been addressed when compared to other similar businesses. 
I think the information gathered to date is skewed and lacks independent research. I have lived in 
the area for thirty years and have seen the traffic get worse every year, especially around Dobson 
and Ray, just east of the Frys. All the neighbors I have spoken to are against this proposal. I am 
going to voice my concerns, and I am concerned about the traffic, not the Chevron people. Instead 
of focusing on the number of cars passing by, we should focus on the starts, stops, ins and outs, 
and traffic obstacles that will potentially increase. I do not believe a median will solve all the 
problems. I wonder how this proposal is better than the Frys gas station that was proposed in the 
same area and turned down a couple of years ago. I believe we need to be more careful and take 
a forward-thinking approach to our city. Do we really need a gas station with eight pumps when 
electric vehicles are becoming more popular? I do not think this proposal is based on independent 
research, and we need to gather more information.

Page 28 of 34 
 
 
 
DANIEL PESTA, 903 N. Salida Del Sol, Chandler, AZ, spoke in opposition. As the vice president of 
the Capriana HOA, I am located on the southwest corner of Dobson and Ray, and I have had 
multiple residents approach me regarding the traffic in our area. Turning west out of our 
development to get to the 101 freeway is already nearly impossible, and a traffic light is needed 
at Ivanho and Ray. We have attempted to install a light, but the traffic study does not deem it 
necessary. However, turning West out of the area is difficult, and it is common to make a right 
turn and a U-turn at Tor Time for safety. There are four schools nearby, including Anderson 
Elementary School, where my children attend, and numerous children walk through the area. The 
issue is not just about the traffic study but also children's safety. Additionally, do we need another 
gas station in the area? There are already eight gas stations within a mile and a half, and the 
construction of Fry’s gas station was rejected a couple of years ago because we do not need 
another gas station. With the increase in electronic vehicles, gas stations may become less popular 
in the future. Although the construction of apartment buildings on Fry Road is ongoing, those 
residents will not be frequenting this gas station as it is not a destination spot. This is a large 
corporate company, and small businesses like Chevron, which is located across the street, may be 
put out of business. In such a scenario, what will happen to the vacant lot that is zoned as a gas 
station? I just wanted to bring this to your attention and let you know that I and many people in 
my community oppose this. 
 
MAYOR HARTKE said the Fry's gas station had been discussed a couple of times. For our new folks, 
this development was located on Pennington on the northeast side of Fry's. It was right next to 
the neighborhoods, and the council at that time opposed it because it was backed up against the 
residents. At that time, it was not a question of whether the council thought a gas station was 
good or bad - it was just that the council opposed the location. The developer did not bring this 
case to us, and I do not think they saw that they were gaining traction, so that is why it was not 
developed. It was just the location right next to the residents.  
 
VICE MAYOR HARRIS requested to call back QT as a couple of concerns needed to be addressed. 
During their previous speech, certain issues were highlighted, and I would like to offer them an 
opportunity to respond. 
 
VICE MAYOR HARRIS asked about corporate responsibility, specifically for Chandler. He was 
interested to know what steps they are taking to give back to the community and not just receive 
profits.   
 
MR. CHAMBERS said the company donates 5% of its earnings to charities in the community, and 
store employees decide where the funds go through a committee that meets once a quarter. The 
store employees take all the applications and decide locally where the funds go since they are the 
ones who see what the community needs are. The company has a sustainability team that looks 
at how to grow the business sustainably and responsibly, not just from an environmental

Page 29 of 34 
 
 
 
standpoint. The company is retaining all the existing landscape on the specific site because it is 
more sustainable and has less environmental impact. 
 
VICE MAYOR HARRIS asked about the setbacks around the QT in relation to the school and 
daycare. Specifically, they wanted to know how many feet away the QT is from the school and 
daycare, as well as how wide the sidewalk is for pedestrian access. 
 
MR. GREATHOUSE said our location is quite far from Ray Road towards the south, which is on the 
bottom left-hand side of your screen. The canopy and the QT store are set back even further from 
the east side, where Dobson Road is located. Based on the scale of this drawing, it seems like the 
tutor time setback is even greater than the setback along Dobson Road or about a similar distance. 
On the north side, there is less of a setback because there is a parking lot for Seton. When we met 
with Seton, they requested us to install a 70-foot wall along the north property line of the QT site. 
We have agreed to their request, which is shown on the site plan. 
 
VICE MAYOR HARRIS asked about the daycare and whether they requested a wall or speed 
mitigation measures such as speed bumps. Vice Mayor Harris also wanted to know if a barrier 
wall was requested. 
 
MR. CHAMBERS said Tutor Time did not request a barrier wall. Instead, they discussed adding 
lights at the dumpster, putting up signs in their parking area, installing speed bumps, and adding 
signs inside the site to direct QT customers and encourage them to avoid going through the Tutor 
Time portion of the shared access. 
 
VICE MAYOR HARRIS asked if this project aligns with our Capital plan for road widening, and if so, 
how will you prepare for it in case it gets approved. 
 
MR. GREATHOUSE asked if he was referring to the median improvements on Dobson Road and 
when the QT would be constructed and opened.  
 
VICE MAYOR HARRIS said yes.  
 
MR. GREATHOUSE said that one topic we have discussed with your team is the possibility of a six-
month gap between opening a QT store and completing the Capital Improvement project. In such 
a situation, we would be glad to put a "pork chop" diversion in place that allows right-in and right-
out traffic. This diversion effectively accomplishes the same goal as a median, although medians 
are more permanent and less easy to breach. Nonetheless, we would be pleased to install a pork 
chop if it is required as an interim solution.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART asked which charities the four stores in Chandler are supporting 
presently.

Page 30 of 34 
 
 
 
 
MR. CHAMBERS said he was unaware of the charities but could provide that information.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART asked about the timing of Tutor Time's objection letter compared to 
the current situation, where they seem to be agreeable with some of the conditions mentioned 
by Councilmember Orlando.  
 
MR. GREATHOUSE said initially that Tutor Time expressed no objections to QT but later submitted 
a letter of opposition on the day of the city council meeting. However, Tutor Time later expressed 
appreciation for the offer of speed humps to help with the situation.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART asked for the email correspondence from Mr. Greathouse regarding 
Tutor Time.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART discussed opposition to a new convenience store in the 
neighborhood. The main concern is traffic, as the store is likely to cause congestion at the 
intersection. However, the city's role is to facilitate opportunities for small business owners rather 
than protect them. The focus should be on creating safe streets and ensuring good infrastructure. 
The solution to the traffic problem may lie in moving up the intersection's construction timeline, 
which could be funded by federal funds. Stewart believes that finding a compromise that works 
for the neighbors is the key and asks the city manager what can be done.  
 
JOSHUA WRIGHT, City Manager, said the project is partially federally funded and scheduled in 
sequence with other projects. They compete for funding and get in line to pursue additional 
funding. If the council wants to move the project ahead of others on the list, they will have to seek 
some other source of funding or try to advance it up in the schedule. Since they are in the design 
phase, they could pursue this, but it is not guaranteed.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART asked about the risks and rewards involved in funding. It was 
emphasized that these dollars are crucial since the city has other projects that need to be done 
with Federal funding. Despite the frustration caused by some of the construction, the city is 
making good progress with road construction. It was discussed whether the three- or four-month 
timeline makes a significant difference and whether reimbursement can be obtained.  
 
MR. WRIGHT discussed the obligation of federal funding for a construction project. The project is 
budgeted for $10.3 million, which includes construction only, and is a mix of local bond funding 
and capital grants. The city needs final approval to proceed with construction to access the 
funding. There are some Right Way acquisition things that will be included in the project as well. 
 
MAYOR HARTKE suggests aligning a potential Council decision with a less inhibited temporary 
solution. He is interested in not turning down million-dollar Federal funding.

Page 31 of 34 
 
 
 
 
COUNCILMEMBER ELLIS asked about the validity of the signatures gathered for removing QT. 
Everyone has the right to put their business where it benefits the community. Councilmember Ellis 
also requested clarification on how signatures were collected. 
 
MR. GREATHOUSE said the signatures were collected primarily by Bilstein Consulting. Their team 
is made up of volunteers and people who they found just love QT, and they also have paid 
employees who gathered these signatures. I do not know what would show this. 
 
COUNCILMEMBER ELLIS clarified the source of the signatures and whether the petitioner's 
employees were involved.  
 
MR. GREATHOUSE said they had a QT badge but clarified that they were not QT employees.  
 
Action Agenda Motion 
Mayor Hartke moved to tentatively adopt Ordinance No. 5084 approving PLH23-0044 QuikTrip 
Convenience Store and Gas Station, amending the Planned Area Development (PAD) zoning for 
commercial uses to permit a fuel service station, subject to the conditions as recommended by 
Planning and Zoning Commission; Seconded by Vice Mayor Harris.  
 
Motion to Amend 
Mayor Hartke moved to amend the original motion; Seconded by Vice Mayor Harris. 
 
Motion carried unanimously (7-0). 
 
Amended Motion 
Mayor Hartke moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Harris, to tentatively adopt Ordinance No. 5084 
approving PLH23-0044 QuikTrip Convenience Store and Gas Station, amending the Planned Area 
Development (PAD) zoning for commercial uses to permit a fuel service station, subject to the 
conditions as recommended by Planning and Zoning Commission with the following 
amendments: 
 
• QuikTrip shall add a traffic control “porkchop” at the  Dobson Road entrance to prevent left 
hand turns from north bound traffic into the project site; QuikTrip shall remove the  traffic 
control “porkchop” once the City of Chandler completes the Capital Improvements Project at 
the intersection. 
• Subject to Tutor Time approval, QuikTrip shall install the following concessions on Tutor 
Times property: wayfinding signage, no parking signage, speed bumps, and lighting around 
Tutor Times dumpster.

Page 32 of 34 
 
 
 
Motion carried unanimously (5-2), Councilmembers Orlando and Encinas dissenting. 
 
Informational 
26.  
Special Event Liquor Licenses and Temporary and Permanent Extensions of Liquor License 
Premises Administratively Approved   
  
27.  
 Claims Report for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024   
  
28.  
 Contracts and Agreements Administratively Approved, Month of March 2024 
 
Unscheduled Public Appearances 
None 
 
Current Events 
Mayor's Announcements 
MAYOR HARTKE expressed gratitude towards the residents who served on the boards and 
commissions during the 2024 appreciation event. Mayor thanked the clerk's office and the fifth-
floor staff for their efforts in organizing the event. The event was aimed at acknowledging the 
important work and insight provided by the boards and commissions to the Council. It was a great 
morning of connection and a gentle reminder of their contributions.  
 
Mayor Hartke regretfully announced we cannot attend the highly anticipated Chandler Police 
Department volunteer appreciation banquet tonight. We deeply apologize to all our dedicated 
volunteers for this inconvenience and want to emphasize the significance of this event in 
recognizing their invaluable contributions to our community. 
 
Mayor Hartke announced the Chandler volunteer recognition breakfast on April 19th and the 
Chandler Center for the Arts volunteer friend’s appreciation event on April 26th. Volunteers will 
be honored at both events. 
 
Join us at Chandler Nature Center on April 27th from 9 AM to noon to celebrate Earth Day with 
crafts, activities, information booths, and more. This free, family-friendly event at Veterans Oasis 
Park is a great way to learn about conservation and sustainability. See you there! 
 
Mayor Hartke has announced that the 50th anniversary of Elmer's, a favorite taco spot on Arizona 
Avenue, will be celebrated tomorrow. Mayor will be present to read a proclamation at 11:00 am 
to honor Elmer's and their contributions to the community.

Page 33 of 34 
 
 
 
Council's Announcements 
COUNCILMEMBER ELLIS announced Chandler Museum exhibit The Fourth Grade Project at the 
Chandler Museum from April 23 – August 11, 2024.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ELLIS announced National Public Safety Telecommunications Week, April 14th 
– April 20th, during which the police department will provide essential 24/7 support to the 
community.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART announced that the Free Tumble Weed movie series at Cine Park 
starts on May 3rd with Super Mario Brothers. Bring a blanket or chair and snacks to enjoy the 
movie under the stars. It is a great family event.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART announced that the water safety walk is coming up. The Desert Oasis 
Aquatic Center is hosting the annual walk on May 4th. The Channel Fire Department is also looking 
for volunteers.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART announced attending the Governor's prayer breakfast in downtown 
Phoenix with Mayor Hartke, Vice Mayor Harris, and Councilmember Ellis. The event brought 
people from all sides of the aisle, clergy and business leaders, together to pray for the community 
and peace. It lasted about 90 minutes and felt collaborative.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO expressed his gratitude to Mayor Hartke for conducting an excellent 
and civil meeting. He appreciated the Mayor's handling of the crowd and thanked him for allowing 
more details to be shared during the meeting.  
 
City Manager's Announcements 
Wished all a Happy Passover, which starts on Monday.  
 
Adjourn 
The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. 
 
 
ATTEST:  _______________________  
______________________________ 
                       City Clerk                                                   Mayor 
 
 
Approval Date of Minutes:  May 9, 2024

Page 34 of 34 
 
 
 
Certification 
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of Regular 
Meeting of the City Council of Chandler, Arizona, held on the 18th day of April 2024.  I further 
certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. 
 
DATED this _______ day of May, 2024. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
__________________________ 
                                                         
           City Clerk