May 1, 2024 Regular Meeting Minutes

City of Chandler — Study Session (2024-06-10)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via ocr_local) 24908 characters
Meeting Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular Meeting

May 1, 2024 | 5:30 p.m. lana
Chandler City Council Chambers Bore. CHANDLER
88 E. Chicago Street, Chandler, AZ Community of Innovation
Call to Order
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Heumann at 5:33 p.m.
_ Roll Call
Commission Attendance Staff Attendance
Chairman Rick Heumann Kevin Mayo, Planning Administrator
Vice Chair Sherri Koshiol : David de la Torre, Planning Manager
Commissioner Michael Quinn Lauren Schumann, Principal Planner
Commissioner Kyle Barichello Alisa Petterson, Senior Planner
Commissioner Rene Lopez (appearing telephonically) Darsy Omer, Associate Planner
Commissioner Charlotte Golla Taylor Manemann, Associate Planner
Thomas Allen, Assistant City Attorney
Julie San Miguel, Clerk
Michelle Reeder, Clerk
Pledge of Allegiance

The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Barichello.

Scheduled and Unscheduled Public Appearances

Members of the audience may address any item not on the agenda. State Statute prohibits the
Board or Commission from discussing an item that is not on the agenda, but the Board or
Commission does listen to your concerns and has staff follow up on any questions you raise.

Consent Agenda and Discussion
1. April 17, 2024, Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes

Move Planning and Zoning Commission approve Planning and Zoning Commission meeting
minutes of the Study Session of April 17, 2024, and Regular Meeting of April 17, 2024.

2. PLH23-0063 - CBREIM Frye

Rezoning from Planned Industrial (I-1) District to Planned Area Development (PAD) for a data
center with Mid-Rise Overlay to allow building heights up to 95 feet and Preliminary
Development Plan approval to expand an existing data center facility. The subject site is located
at 2500 W. Frye Road, generally located % mile south and east of Chandler Boulevard and Price
Road.

Move Planning and Zoning Commission continue PLH23-0063 CBREIM Frye, Rezoning from
Planned Industrial (I-1) District to Planned Area Development (PAD) for a data center with Mid-
Rise Overlay to allow building heights up to 95 feet and Preliminary Development Plan approval
to expand an existing data center facility to the June 5, 2024, meeting, as requested by the
applicant.

An Addendum Memo was presented to the Commission, Planning staff received a letter from
the Applicant addressed to the Planning and Zoning Commission providing details relating to the
request for continuance.

4. .PLH23-0067 ALL COPY

Request Use Permit approval for an office/warehouse building located at the northwest corner
of Chicago Street and Beck Avenue, generally located % mile east and south of 56th Street and
Chandler Boulevard.

Recommended Conditions of Approval

Planning staff recommends Planning and Zoning Commission move to recommend approval of

the Use Permit/Preliminary Development Plan, subject to the following conditions:

1. Development shall be in substantial conformance with exhibits and representations entitled
"PLH23-0067 All Copy Exhibits" kept on file in the City of Chandler's Planning Division, in file
No. PLH23-0067 All Copy, modified by such conditions included at the time the exhibits were
approved by the City Council and/or as thereafter amended, modified or supplemented by
the City Council.

2. Use Permit approval does not constitute Final Development Plan approval; compliance with
the details required by all applicable codes and conditions of the City of Chandler and this
Use Permit shall apply.

3. Uses permitted shall be those permitted in the I-2 General Industrial District and office

provided that parking requirements are met pursuant to Article XVIII Parking and Loading
Regulations of the Chandler City Code.

Page 2 of 11

4. All employees and clients shall park on-site.
5. The site shall be maintained in a clean and orderly manner.

5. PLH24-0005 GOLD TRUST REALTY

Request Use Permit time extension to allow the continued use of a residential home zoned
Single-Family District (SF-8.5) as a real estate office. The business is located at 200 S Dobson
Road, generally located north of the northwest corner of Dobson and Frye roads.

Recommended Conditions of Approval
Planning staff recommends Planning and Zoning Commission move to recommend approval of
the Use Permit, subject to the following conditions:

1. Substantial expansion or modification beyond the approved exhibits (Exhibits and Narrative)
shall void the Use Permit and require new Use Permit application and approval.

2. Any expansion or modifications beyond the approved exhibits shall void the Use Permit.
3. The Use Permit is non-transferable to any other property.

4. Substantial increases in on-site employment over that as represented as 3 full time
equivalent, or substantial expansion of the home to provide additional office space, shall
require Use Permit amendment and approval by the City of Chandler.

5. The site shall be maintained in a clean and orderly manner.

6. Use Permit approval does not constitute Final Development Plan approval; compliance with
the details required by all applicable codes and conditions of the City of Chandler and this
Use Permit shall apply.

Consent Agenda Motion and Vote

VICE CHAIR KOSHIOL moved to approve the Consent Agenda of the May 1, 2024, Regular
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting with stipulations presented by staff; Seconded by
COMMISSIONER QUINN.

Motion carried unanimously (6-0).

Action Agenda Item No. 3 and Discussion

3. PLH24-0012/PLH23-0056/PLT23-0022 VIVIENDO
LAUREN SCHUMANN, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, presented details regarding a request to amend
Section 23 Area Plan from Neighborhood Commercial to Residential, Rezoning from Planned

Page 3 of 11

Area Development (PAD) for Neighborhood Commercial and congregate care to PAD for single-
family residential, Preliminary Development Plan approval for subdivision layout and housing
product, and Preliminary Plat approval for a 76-lot single-family subdivision on approximately
15.4 acres located at the southeast corner of Ocotillo and McQueen roads.

An Addendum Memo was presented to the Commission, Planning staff received two additional
letters from adjacent residents: one in support and the other against the request.

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN announced that he has received some speaker cards for Item No. 3 and
he would like to hear from the speakers before deciding to pull the Item from the Consent
Agenda.

CONNIE FRASIER, 4295 SOUTH CROSSCREEK DRIVE expressed concerns about the proposed
housing development. She stated a month earlier, a representative said there would be a
reduction in the number of houses planned and they would be keeping an entrance and exit on
Alamosa. She asked why they needed this entrance was as there is already an existing entrance
on McQueen. She presented concerns regarding the small size of Alamosa Street and increased
traffic issues especially turning left on to McQueen. She asked why a traffic signal could not be
installed and was advised that its too close to the signal on Ocotillo, she pointed out that the
distance seemed to be the same.

JENNIFER ALVEY, 1154 EAST GRAND CANYON ROAD stated she has lived in Chandler. for twenty-
two years and expressed appreciation for the city's management of growth. She voiced concerns
over the housing development and stated what is build should benefit the people moving in
and the residents who are existing. She highlighted the importance of maintaining the buffer
between existing homes and how after they were shown a proposal with a buffer then shown an
updated image with the buffer altered to be smaller. She presented further concerns regarding
the impact of traffic due to the Amazon, bus barn, and other developments.

RIZWAN RASHEED, 4190 SOUTH JESSE STREET stated that Jennifer Alvey is his neighbor and there
will be twelve homes up against their two homes. He expressed concerns about the density of
the proposed development and suggested a different builder who could provide lower-density
or light commercial. He stated the Applicant advised him that they could not provide a lower
density in a profitable way and that they are only looking out for their best interest and not the
community.

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN announced that he will be pulling this Item for Action and asked staff to
address the concerns voiced by the speakers, regarding residential impact and traffic.

LAUREN SCHUMANN, PRINCIPAL PLANNER explained before the applicant submitted an
application, they provided a preliminary technical review; this allowed various municipal
departments, including fire, civil, traffic, building, and utilities, to review the proposal before an

Page 4 of 11

application is filed. She stated the city’s general practice for developments is to limit the number
of entrances on an arterial road and to use collector streets to channel traffic from smaller to
larger roads. She stated it is the city’s preference to use Alamosa to allow traffic to flow rather
than creating another entrance on McQueen. She bought up Google Maps and pointed out the
subdivisions south of the area do not have access to McQueen and instead used collector
streets to the north and south. She stated that his is the best practice per the City’s Traffic
Engineer.

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN confirmed that the closest school was San Tan Elementary and that
drivers would have to do a lot of cutting through neighborhoods to reach it. He asked staff to
address the concerns raised by the speakers.

LAUREN SCHUMANN, PRINCIPAL PLANNER stated that she spoke to the resident who brought up
the need for a traffic signal at a neighborhood meeting and it was confirmed with the traffic
engineer that Amorosa was too close to the intersection of McQueen and Ocotillo to install a
traffic signal.

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN pointed out that one speaker stated that he supported commercial. He
asked staff to explain the traffic impact if the area were developed commercially, such as a
convenience store, compared to the current residential proposal.

LAUREN SCHUMANN, PRINCIPAL PLANNER responded that commercial developments typically
generate more traffic than residential or even multifamily developments due to the higher
number of trips generated.

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN commented on a recent proposal for a Quick Trip that came before
Planning and Zoning and that could generate hundreds of trips.

VICE CHAIR KOSHIOL asked staff to clarify the situation regarding a buffer zone that was
mentioned previously.

LAUREN SCHUMANN, PRINCIPAL PLANNER stated at the December neighborhood meeting, a
proposal was made for a 20-foot sidewalk buffer between existing and proposed homes. She
described this space as historically being a 'no man's land' and detailed concerns about safety
and security within these zones, suggesting instead that larger lots with landscaped areas would
be more beneficial.

VICE CHAIR KOSHIOL sought to confirm that the 20-foot buffer had been incorporated-into the
lot sizes of lots 30 through 40 to make them deeper.

LAUREN SCHUMANN, PRINCIPAL PLANNER confirmed that is correct and there will be another
sidewalk along McQueen closer to the development to provide a safer environment for residents

Page 5 of 11

walking their dogs away from the busy road.
VICE CHAIR KOSHIOL advised that she liked that idea a lot and asked if that would be gated off.

LAUREN SCHUMANN, PRINCIPAL PLANNER confirmed that the walkway would be open to the
public and not gated off.

COMMISSIONER BARICHELLO stated he did not see that in the rendering.
LAUREN SCHUMANN, PRINCIPAL PLANNER stated staff will confirm.

COMMISSIONER GOLLA sought clarification whether the larger lot sizes still allowed for a 20-foot
buffer.

LAUREN SCHUMANN, PRINCIPAL PLANNER explained that the 20-foot landscaped area was
eliminated in favor of extending the lot sizes, thus providing larger backyards and maintaining a
buffer from the homes.

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN asked staff to address issues related to building height and the single
story with push back two story and their impact on privacy.

KEVIN MAYO, PLANNING ADMINISTRATOR stated that these questions are aimed towards
specifics in the proposal and would be better addressed by the Applicant.

RALPH PEW, APPLICANT introduced himself and stated that Mr. Chuck Chism and Francisco
Castillo from K. Hovnanian are present in case there are any questions they could address. He
stated Alamosa Drive has been a point of discussion from the beginning with the neighbors and
as staff indicated, the city wanted to minimize the number of access points on McQueen Road.
He explained that consequently, the best approach was to place an entrance on Alamosa at the
southern edge and make it only for residents. He further explained this entrance would require
a key; therefore deliveries, guest and public access would occur up on Ocotillo. The Applicant
believed they have done all they could to comply with the street design standards in the city
while creating a better situation for the neighborhood with the Alamosa location. He further
explained the existing curb cuts on McQueen Road are roadway drainage spillways. He stated
spillways take drainage from the road and channeled water from the street, he wanted to make
sure everyone knew they were not designed for road access. He stated that the buffer had also
became and issue and explained that without constant monitoring, it could turn into a location
for mischief; therefore, it was decided the best to incorporate that land into the lots. He further
explained the change was initially thought to be a good idea until further consideration led to its
revision. He stated all the single-story homes adjoining this property were planned to not have
two-story homes near them. He stated the proposed residential is better than commercial due
to the increased traffic that commercial would case. He further stated their plan had been

Page 6 of 11

revised from 91 lots to 76, so they have been reducing the density and keeping it consistent with
the Southeast Area Chandler Plan. He explained the density appeared higher when calculated
just for the 15.3 net acres at 76 units, it fit well within the allowed density ranges when averaged
as intended under the plan and the home sizes in this proposal ranged from just over 2000 to
almost 3400 square feet, indicating that these ware significant homes on smaller lots. He
presented an image showing an overview of the site, demonstrating compliance with the
Southeast Area Chandler Plan, and outlining the changes in the plan from 91 lots at 4000 square
feet to the current 76 lots with almost 5000 square feet each. He stated there were now 12 two-
story lots with a 40-foot minimum setback, and 15 of the 76 lots were specifically limited to
single-story homes. He then presented renderings of the elevations, providing a visual of the
spatial relationships and textures within the community, particularly in the remodeled barbecue
and amenity areas. He emphasized efforts to avoid situations where a rear wall met the
minimum setback and aligned with all other rear walls, showing the textured appearance on the
street frontages, especially along McQueen Road. He thanked the Commission and urged the
support of this project.

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN invited any members of the audience would like to speak to come up to
the podium.

CONNIE FRASIER, 4295 SOUTH CROSSCREEK DRIVE thanked the Applicant for providing clarity on
some of the issues, but she would like to point out that Alamosa is not a feeder street and does
not travel continuously from east to west. She clarified Alamosa spans the length of six houses
before ending at entrances to Alamosa Estates or Geneva Estates and this is not comparable to
a feeder street situation because any car exiting the new subdivision onto Alamosa to reach
Santana Elementary or Junior High would have to navigate through residential neighborhoods.
She presented concerns regarding impact on their streets as this is where children bike, walk to
school, and there are multigenerational families where elderly live. She emphasized the
community's concern about the increase in traffic through neighborhoods rather than on a
feeder street, urging the city to consider this when making their decisions.

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN thanked the speaker and asked if anyone else in the audience wanted to
speak. He asked staff to address the feeder street issue.

KEVIN MAYO, PLANNING ADMINISTRATOR explained although there was never a formal
Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) approved for the commercial center, the concept site plan
for Geneva Estates included a driveway connection to Alamosa and exits onto McQueen and
another street. He noted that even if the area developed as intended with retail and office
spaces, the traffic from those commercial activities would exceed what the proposed residential
subdivision would generate. He described how collector streets function not always to connect
one arterial to another but to collect traffic from neighborhoods like Geneva Estates and
Alamosa Estates and direct it towards major roads like McQueen. He stated despite the
speaker's correct observation that the situation was different south of the site, in traffic

Page 7 of 11

engineering terms, it was still considered a collector street. Kevin acknowledged the legitimate
concerns about cut through traffic affecting local school routes, explaining that even if the
subdivision's access point were moved, parents might still choose to cut through neighborhoods
to reach schools. This issue, he noted, is a common challenge near schools throughout the city.

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN thanked staff for the explanation and confirmed there were no further
questions or comments from the Commission Members.

Action Agenda Item No. 3 Motion and Vote

Proposed Motion:

Area Plan

Move Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of Section 23 Area Plan
amendment, PLH24-0012, as recommended Planning staff.

Rezoning

Move Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of Rezoning PLH23-0056 Viviendo,
Rezoning from PAD for Neighborhood Commercial and congregate care to PAD for single-family
residential on approximately 15.4 acres, subject to the conditions as recommended by Planning
staff.

Preliminary Development Plan

Move Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of Preliminary Development Plan
PLH23-0056 Viviendo for subdivision layout and housing product, subject to the conditions as
recommended by Planning staff.

Preliminary Plat

Move Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of Preliminary Plat, PLT23-0022
Viviendo, a 76-lot single-family subdivision, subject to the condition as recommended by
Planning staff.

Recommended Conditions of Approval:

Area Plan Amendment

Planning staff recommends Planning and Zoning Commission move to recommend approval of
the Area Plan Amendment to the Section 23 Area Plan from Neighborhood Commercial to
Residential.

Rezoning

Planning staff recommends Planning and Zoning Commission move to recommend approval of
Rezoning from PAD for Neighborhood Commercial and congregate care to PAD for single-family
residential, subject to the following conditions:

Page 8 of 11

=

. Development shall be in substantial conformance with the Development Booklet, entitled,
‘Viviendo” and kept on file in the City of Chandler Planning Division, in File No. PLH23-
0056, modified by such conditions including at the time the Booklet was approved by the
Chandler City Council and/or as therefore amended, modified or supplemented by
Chandler City Council.

2. Uses permitted shall be single-family dwellings, with a minimum lot size of 4,500 square
feet.

3. Completion of the construction of all required off-site street improvements including but
not limited to paving, landscaping, curb, gutter and sidewalks, median improvements and
street lighting to achieve conformance with City codes, standard details, and design
manuals.

4. The landscaping in all private open-spaces shall be maintained by the property owner or
property's association, and shall be maintained at a level consistent with or better than at
the time of planting.

5. The landscaping in all rights-of-ways shall be maintained by the adjacent property owner
or property owner's association.

6. The developer shall be required to install landscaping in the arterial street median(s)
adjoining this project. In the event that the landscaping already exists within such
median(s) the developer shall be required to upgrade such landscaping to meet current
City Standards. ‘

7. Right-of-way dedications to achieve full half-widths, including turn lanes and deceleration
lanes, per the standards of the Chandler Transportation Plan.

8. Lot coverage shall not exceed sixty percent (60%) of each lot area.

9. Minimum setbacks shall be as provided below and further detailed in the Development
Booklet:

Property Line [Building Setback
20 ft. from back of sidewalk to garage door
13 ft. from property line to livable
Side Yards _[5 ft. for each side

Rear Yard 10 ft.; Accessory buildings 5 ft.

Front Yard

Preliminary Development Plan
Planning staff recommends Planning and Zoning Commission move to recommend approval of
the Preliminary Development Plan, subject to the following conditions:

Page 9 of 14

=

Development shall be in substantial conformance with the Development Booklet, entitled,
‘Viviendo” and kept on file in the City of Chandler Planning Division, in File No. PLH23-
0056, modified by such conditions including at the time the Booklet was approved by the
Chandler City Council and/or as therefore amended, modified or supplemented by
Chandler City Council.

2. The same elevation shall not be built side-by-side or directly across the street from one
another.

3. Lots shall be restricted to single-story or a combination of one-story with two story
elements as indicated in the Viviendo- Site Plan.

4. The site shall be maintained in a clean and orderly manner.

5. Landscaping plans (including for open spaces, rights-of-way, and street medians) and
perimeter walls shall be approved by the Planning Administrator.

6. The following enhanced landscape standards shall apply to the common open space and
retention area along Ocotillo and McQueen roads:
a. 50% of required trees shall have a minimum planting size of a 36-inch box and a
minimum of 12-feet in height at the time of planting.
b. A minimum of one (1) tree and six (6) shrubs per twenty-five (25) lineal feet of
frontage on arterial or collector street rights-of-way.

7. The covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC & R's) to be filed and recorded with the
subdivision shall mandate the installation of front yard landscaping within 180 days from
the date of occupancy with the homeowners' association responsible for monitoring and
enforcement of this requirement.

8. Sign packages, including free-standing signs as well as wall-mounted signs, shall be
designed in coordination with landscape plans, planting materials, storm water retention
requirements, and utility pedestals, so as not to create problems with sign visibility or
prompt the removal of required landscape materials.

9. Each garage shall be pre-wired to provide 240V electrical capacity necessary to
accommodate future electric vehicle charging equipment.

10.Preliminary Development Plan approval does not constitute Final Development Plan
approval; compliance with the details required by all applicable codes and conditions of
the City of Chandler and this Preliminary Development Plan shall apply.

Preliminary Plat
Page 10 of 11

Planning staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission move to recommend approval
of the Preliminary Plat subject to the following condition:
1. Approval by the City Engineer and Planning Administrator with regard to the details of all

submittals required by code or condition.

COMMISSIONER QUINN moved to approve the Action Agenda of the May 1, 2024, Regular
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting with stipulations presented by staff; Seconded by

COMMISSIONER BARICHELLO.
Motion carried unanimously (6-0).

CHAIRMAN HEUMANN announced that the Planning and Zoning Commission is a recommending
board to the City Council, therefore the speakers and other members of the public will have
another opportunity to present their concerns. He asked staff when this item would go before

City Council

DAVID DE LA TORRE, PLANNING MANAGER stated that that this item will go before the City
Council on Thursday, May 23, 2024.

Member Comments/Announcements
CHAIRMAN HEUMANN extended warm wishes for a Happy Mother's Day to all mothers, for the
upcoming holiday.

Calendar
The next regular meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 15, 2024, in the Chandler City Council
Chambers, 88 E. Chicago Street, Chandler, Arizona.

Adjourn

The meeting was adjourned at 6:12 p.m.

ote Wh

Kevin Mayo, Secretary Rick Heumann, Chairman

Page 11 of 11