June 25, 2025 Meeting Minutes

City of Chandler — Regular Meeting (2025-07-29)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 14425 characters
Page 1 of 9 General Plan Resident Advisory Committee 
 
General Plan Resident 
Advisory Committee 
Regular Meeting 
 
June 25, 2025 | 3:00 p.m. 
Chandler Public Library-  
Downtown Copper Room South 
22 S. Delaware St., Chandler, AZ 
 
Roll Call 
The meeting was called to Order by Chairman Dunn 3:04pm 
 
Committee Members Attendance:`  
Chair Boyd Dunn, Vice Chair Jack Sellers, Michael Monteilh, Peppur Chambers, Rene 
Barrios, Jess Lopez, Chris Dobson, Lori Collins, Terri Kimble, Michael Pollack, 
Brennan Ray, Shannon Portillio, Chrissy Rodriguez; no members virtually attended 
Excused Absent: Crystal Blackwell, Alison Garrard, Lisa Grayer, Garry Hays, Rick 
Heumann, Spike Lawrence, Jyoti Pathak, Micheal Underwood 
Committee has a quorum. 
Consent Agenda 
1. May 1, 2025 General Plan Resident Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes 
Move Resident Advisory Committee approve the General Plan Resident Advisory 
Committee meeting minutes of the May 1, 2025, meeting.

Page 2 of 9 General Plan Resident Advisory Committee 
 
 
 
Motion passes 12-0 
*Committee Member Ray abstains from voting on minutes due to absence 
from previous meeting. 
Discussion 
2. Housing  
Rick Merrit from Elliot D. Pollack & Company introduced the Chandler 
Comprehensive Housing Plan, explaining the process and the current stage of data 
collection, public engagement, and housing gap analysis. 
o Data Collection: Rick Merrit explained that the data collection phase 
involved gathering extensive information on housing needs and trends 
within the community. This data is crucial for identifying gaps and 
formulating effective housing policies. 
o Public Engagement: Public engagement in the housing plan is 
essential for understanding local needs and ensuring that the plan 
addresses the concerns of residents. 
o Housing Gap Analysis: Rick Merrit discussed the housing gap analysis, 
which aims to identify the shortfall in housing availability and 
affordability. This analysis helps in targeting specific areas where 
intervention is needed to improve housing conditions. 
• 
Affordable Housing Definitions: Rick Merrit discussed the definitions of 
affordable housing, including attainable housing, workforce housing, and 
missing middle housing, and the goal of paying no more than 30% of income 
on housing.  
Committee Member Kimble requested these definitions be made clear and 
included in the plan for reference. 
o Affordable Housing: affordable housing is housing that costs no more 
than 30% of a household's income. This includes various types such as 
attainable housing, workforce housing, and missing middle housing.

Page 3 of 9 General Plan Resident Advisory Committee 
 
o Attainable Housing: attainable housing is designed for households 
earning between 60% and 120% of the median income, making it 
accessible to middle-income earners who do not qualify for low-
income housing but cannot afford market-rate housing. 
o Workforce Housing: workforce housing is housing for essential 
workers such as teachers, police officers, and firefighters. These 
individuals earn too much to qualify for low-income housing but still 
struggle to afford market-rate housing.  
o Missing Middle Housing: Missing Middle Housing includes housing 
types like duplexes, fourplexes, and townhomes. These types of 
housing provide more affordable options between single-family 
homes and high-density apartments. 
• 
Chandler Demographics: highlights include the low median age compared 
to the state average, high median income of approximately $105,000 per 
year, placing it among the top cities in the state for income levels, and highly 
educated population with nearly half of residents over 25 holding a 
bachelor's degree or higher. This contributes to the high median income and 
strong job market in the area. 
• 
Commuting Patterns: A significant number of people leave and enter 
Chandler for work daily, with only a small percentage living and working in 
the city. 
o Commuting Out: approximately 106,000 people leave Chandler daily 
to work in other areas, highlighting the city's role as a residential 
community for many workers. 
o Commuting In: around 112,000 people commute into Chandler each 
day for work, indicating a strong job market that attracts workers from 
surrounding areas. 
o Local Workers: only about 27,000 people both live and work in 
Chandler, suggesting a need for more local employment opportunities 
to reduce commuting. 
o Balanced Housing Plan: Rick emphasized the goal of creating a more 
balanced housing plan to encourage more people to live and work

Page 4 of 9 General Plan Resident Advisory Committee 
 
within Chandler, reducing the need for long commutes and easing the 
burden on roadways. 
• 
Population Forecast: The population forecast for Chandler projects an 
increase of 18,000 people (from 286,000 to 304,000) and 6,800 new 
households over the next 15-16 years. 
o Housing Demand: including a vacancy rate, the demand for new 
housing units could reach about 7,200 units, highlighting the need for 
strategic planning to accommodate this growth. 
• 
Housing Market Trends: Market trends include essentially all housing 
types. 14% of single-family homes in Chandler are rented, a decrease from 
the post-Great Recession period but still significant. About one-third of all 
rentals in Chandler are single-family homes, indicating a strong demand for 
rental housing in this category. The shift from single-family to multifamily 
housing is notable in recent years, driven by market conditions and land 
availability. 
o Apartment Market: There has been significant increase in average 
rent for apartments in Chandler by 27% in 2021, reflecting a significant 
rise in housing costs. Increased competition in the apartment market 
has led to more competitive rents, although they remain high 
compared to previous years. 
o New Units: New apartment units built in recent years are more 
expensive, with rents for units built before 2023 averaging $1,650, 
while those built after 2023 average over $1,900. 
o Cost Drivers: High rents can be attributed to factors such as land 
costs and construction expenses, which have driven up the price of 
new apartments. 
• 
Affordable Housing Efforts: Rick Merrit acknowledged the city's efforts in 
addressing affordable housing, including public housing projects, scattered 
site housing, and housing vouchers. 
o Public Housing Projects: The city has an initiative to replace four 
public housing projects with two new ones, one of which is under

Page 5 of 9 General Plan Resident Advisory Committee 
 
construction and the other set to break ground soon (Villas & Haven). 
Chandler is moving away from City led public housing. 
o Scattered Site Housing: Chandler’s scattered site housing program, 
which provides affordable housing options throughout the 
community. 
o Housing Vouchers: Chandler offers approximately 1,100 housing 
vouchers to assist low-income residents in affording housing. 
o Nonprofit Partnerships: Rick Merrit acknowledged the contributions 
of nonprofits like, ARM, Habitat for Humanity and Newtown CLT 
(Community Land Trust) in providing homeownership opportunities 
and affordable housing in Chandler. 
• 
Housing Pipeline: Rick Merrit presented the pipeline of approved but not yet 
built housing units, indicating a good supply of apartments still to come. 
o Approved Units: there are approximately 2,150 housing units 
approved but not yet built in Chandler, indicating a strong pipeline of 
future housing. 
o Occupancy Rates: current occupancy rates for apartments are high, 
with many complexes reporting 90-95% occupancy, reflecting strong 
demand for rental housing. 
• 
Ownership Market: The ownership market shows an increase in housing 
costs and the challenges in finding affordable homes. 
• 
Housing Gap Analysis: Committee Member Ray asked for an estimation of 
the gap between what Chandler has, what they need and what they have 
potential to build. Rick Merrit explained the housing gap analysis, highlighting 
the deficits in affordable housing for both renters and owners. 
o Mr. Mayo explained the beginning of the Chandler Housing Gap 
analysis project that will be starting in the next few months. He 
expressed that whereas the General Plan exists at a “30,000 foot level”, 
his goal to have Chandler be a leader in setting standards for 
workforce housing with this Gap Analysis at a ’10,000 foot  level’. 
Chandler is providing information to MAG on this front.

Page 6 of 9 General Plan Resident Advisory Committee 
 
• 
Barriers to Affordable Housing: Rick Merrit identified the barriers to 
affordable housing, including limited land, rising construction costs (TSMC 
draw on local resources, tariffs, etc), lengthy review periods, and in some 
cases restrictive zoning regulations. 
• 
Solutions for Affordable Housing: Some potential solutions (in the form of 
Goals and Objectives for the Housing Plan) to support the production of 
affordable housing, such as using the government property excise tax 
(GPLET), establishing a Community Land Trust, and implementing voluntary 
inclusionary affordable housing policies: 
o Workforce Housing Policy: creating a workforce housing policy that 
includes fee waivers, expedited plan reviews, and reimbursement of 
infrastructure costs. 
o Housing Trust Fund: establishing a Housing Trust Fund to support 
affordable housing projects and continue to work with nonprofit 
partners. Tempe is an example of a community with a voluntary trust 
fund. 
o Promoting Housing Types: promoting various housing types, such as 
townhomes, duplexes, and small lots, and evaluating development 
standards and regulations. 
o City-led redevelopment projects: The school districts forecast a 
decrease in students by nearly 10,000 students in the next ten years. 
School districts may be looking to diversify landholdings. 
• 
Education Campaign: An education campaign on the benefits of affordable 
workforce housing and working with nonprofit groups would improve public 
perception.  
Committee Member Collins stated concerns about the increasing cost of 
living within the city resulting with the young professionals not being able to 
live in the community.  
Committee Member Pollack suggested good density is the only solution to 
the housing issue due to cost of development and today’s interest rates. 
More single-family residential products will not improve housing deficits. 
Within mixed-use developments, first floor commercial does not survive

Page 7 of 9 General Plan Resident Advisory Committee 
 
when parking is not available unless the overall density is comparable to New 
York City.  
Committee Member Lopez asked about when/how the historic 
preservation piece enters the conversation.  
Mr. Mayo explained the Middle Housing legislation that will take effect on 
January 1, 2026. The new law will allow up to 4 stories and up to two units on 
all lots within 1 mile of all downtown core areas. Chandler’s historic overlays 
are in place and may help offset the impacts of the law. 
3. 
Public Participation Update: Numerous community input opportunities 
have already taken place both in person and online with positive feedback 
and good participation rates. The next General Plan Update workshops will 
take place in early August. RAC members are encouraged to attend at the 
Chandler Museum on Tuesday, August 5 | 5:30-7:30 pm and Saturday August 
9 | 11:00 am -1:00 pm.  
 
Chairman Dunn asked how information about events was being 
disseminated. Consultant listed the email group from the city, social media, 
electronic billboard downtown, and the project website as conduits for 
outreach.  
 
4. 
Vision Statement Discussion: Consultant facilitated a discussion on the 
vision statement for the general plan, gathering feedback and suggestions 
from the participants. 
Vision Statement Options:  
Option 1: A City Rooted in Community and Vision  
Chandler is a forward-thinking, inclusive city that values thoughtful 
planning, civic engagement, and balanced growth to preserve its unique 
character. We champion innovation, sustainability, and affordability to 
ensure every resident—past, present, and future—can thrive in a safe, 
connected, and vibrant community.  
Option 2: Thriving Together Across Generations (preferred 
option with edits)

Page 8 of 9 General Plan Resident Advisory Committee 
 
Chandler is a resilient and welcoming city where families, small 
businesses, and diverse communities grow together. With a strong 
foundation in education, safety, and responsible development, we 
prioritize quality of life and opportunity for all generations.  
Option 3: Purposeful Growth, Shared Prosperity  
Rooted in collaboration and guided by community voices, Chandler 
embraces purposeful growth that supports affordability, innovation, 
and environmental stewardship. We are committed to being a city where 
residents feel proud to live, work, and participate in shaping a 
prosperous and inclusive future. 
• Vision Statement Ranking: The consultant conducted an interactive poll to 
rank the vision statements and gather input on potential changes. The group 
discussed and refined the final vision statement, ensuring it aligns with the 
values and goals of the community. 
o Chairman Dunn asked for a motion on the amended statement. 
Committee Member Kimble moved to approve the vision statement 
with edits. Motion was seconded by Committee Member Lopez. 
Motion passed unanimously with no abstentions.  
• Statement 2: The committee agreed that Statement 2 was the 
preferred choice with minor amendments reflected:  
Chandler is a welcoming and resilient city where families, 
businesses, and diverse communities grow together. With a 
strong foundation in education, safety, and responsible 
development, we prioritize quality of life and opportunity for 
all generations.  
Calendar 
The next Regular meeting will be held on Tuesday, August 29, 2025 at 4:00 P.M. at 
the Chandler Nature Center 4050 East Chandler Heights Road, Chandler, Arizona 
85249.

Page 9 of 9 General Plan Resident Advisory Committee 
 
 
Public Comment 
No public comments. 
Adjourn  
The meeting was adjourned by Chairman Dunn at 5:15 p.m. 
 
 
______________________________ 
 
 
 
______________________________ 
Lauren Schumann, Secretary                                           Boyd Dunn, Chairman