August 26, 2025 Meeting Minutes

Page 1 of 5 General Plan Resident Advisory Committee 
 
 
General Plan Resident 
Advisory Committee 
Regular Meeting 
 
August 26th, 2025 | 4:00 p.m. 
Chandler Airport 
2380 S Stinson Way, Chandler, AZ 85286 
 
Roll Call 
The meeting was called to Order by Chair Dunn 4:05 pm 
 
Committee Members In- Person Attendance:  
Chair Dunn Boyd Dunn, Vice Chair Jack Sellers, Lisa Grayer, Alison Garrard, Peppur 
Chambers, Lori Collins, Terri Kimble, Shannon Portillo, Rene Barrios, Shannon 
Portillo, Rick Heumann, Chris Dobson, Jess Lopez  
 
Committee Members Virtual Attendance: Jyoti Pathak, Garry Hayes, Michael 
Monteilh, Chrissy Rodriguez 
Excused Absent: Spike Lawrence, Michael Pollock, Crystal Blackwell, Micheal 
Underwood  
 
Other In-Person Attendance: Lauren Schumann, Kevin Mayo, Kevin Snyder, David 
de la Torre, Terri Hogan, Danielle Smee, Madison Macias 
 
Other Virtual Attendance: Chris Joannes, Rick Merrit

Page 2 of 5 General Plan Resident Advisory Committee 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consent Agenda 
1. July 29th, 2025 General Plan Resident Advisory Committee Meeting 
Minutes 
 
Move to approve minutes by Committee Member Ray.  
Seconded by Committee Member Portillo 
 
Motion passes 13*-0  
*Committee Members Huemann and Collins abstain from voting on minutes due to 
absence from the previous meeting.  
Discussion 
2. Economic Development Presentation by Micah Miranda, Economic 
Development 
• General Plan Amendments 
o No amendments have been made to the 2016 General Plan, indicating 
its enduring relevance. 
• Target Industries & Diversification 
o Concerns about over-reliance on high-tech industries (e.g., Intel, AI). 
o Discussion on the need to support skilled labor industries (HVAC, 
mechanics, welding). 
o M. Miranda provides clarification that Chandler proactively targets 
industries but does not exclude others. 
o Debate on whether Chandler is turning away non-target industries. 
o M. Miranda and Committee Member Pathak emphasize that 
Chandler is not destabilized by growth in the AI sector employment 
wise because it provides infrastructure supporting AI (data centers, 
microchips). 
o Comments on educational institutions supporting economic growth.

Page 3 of 5 General Plan Resident Advisory Committee 
 
 
o Committee Member Ray expressed concern about too much focus on 
target industries and not enough focus on acquiring more skilled 
laborers and professions in Chandler. 
o Committee Member Lopez suggests that Chandler focuses on 
providing first and second office locations for AI and tech companies 
that are actually occupied by employees and not vacant due to remote 
work, as a way to support population diversity and employment goals.  
o Vice Chair Sellers suggests the idea of using a General Plan 
designation to ensure interested developers can actually implement 
mixed use employment and residential development in areas where it 
is being unnecessarily impeded. 
 
• Housing & Mixed Use 
o Vertical housing and mixed-use development are discussed as 
strategies for relevance. 
o Concerns about mixed-use being overly commercial and not industrial. 
o Debate on whether mixed-use is being implemented effectively. 
o General Plan amendments are seen as difficult and discouraging for 
developers. 
o Proactive on homes for the aging as the population ages; concerns with 
the population pyramid of Chandler, younger population decreasing.  
 
3.  2016 Plan Audit Comments Presented by Lauren Schumann 
• Audit Feedback 
o Positive feedback on growth areas and redevelopment. 
o Comments about development around the municipal airport, the  
Airport Commission in 2020 requested residential uses eliminated to 
ensure current and future operations of the airport.  
o Downtown area plan updates underway with interest in increased 
density. 
 
4. General Plan Update Process and Public Engagement Update by Terri 
Hogan 
• Vision Statement (VS) Refinement

Page 4 of 5 General Plan Resident Advisory Committee 
 
 
o Final consensus: Keeping the W2 Vision Statement “Chandler is a 
welcoming and resilient city where families, businesses, and diverse 
communities grow together.” 
 
• Mixed-Use Place Type Models 
o Concerns about public expectation for vertical mixed-use designs due 
to the parcel specific place type models. 
o Clarification that place types are conceptual, not prescriptive. 
o Agreement to use general visual elements (e.g., pictures depicting the 
main elements of each place type such as bike racks or multi use paths) 
for conceptualization as opposed to 3D models of the building types.  
 
• Affordability & Demographics 
o High housing costs and mortgage rates affect affordability. 
o Downsizing is costly; smaller homes are not available or affordable. 
o S. Portillo suggests we prioritize how to make smaller homes more 
affordable for people to downsize when they want to.  
o L. Collins raises that a developer or local group dedicated to 
championing affordable housing, specifically for aging in place, could 
offer success as it has in other cities.  
o Only 1/3 of Intel employees live in Chandler due to housing options. 
o Lack of housing for entry-level professionals and aging populations. 
o T. Kimball asks if aiming for 14k more housing units is too aggressive of 
an approach.  
o T. Kimball asserts that multi-family housing will need to be done 
strategically since the current options are mostly luxury complexes or 
generally not affordable. 
• Growth Areas & Redevelopment 
o R. Heumann expresses concern over Alma School being considered for 
a growth corridor because it is mostly residential.  
o G. Hayes questioned the need for growth areas if area plans suffice. 
o The planning team and consultants reiterated the importance of parcel-
level analysis for general infrastructure planning.

Page 5 of 5 General Plan Resident Advisory Committee 
 
 
o Concerns about over-urbanization and maintaining Chandler’s 
character. 
o P. Chambers asks whether or not it’s actually appropriate to cater to 
NIMBYs while Chandler’s goal is to attract a younger demographic and 
maintain economic vitality.  
• General Plan Implementation 
o Need to balance innovation, resilience, and realistic development goals. 
o Agreement to schedule longer meetings to address unresolved issues. 
 
Calendar 
5. The next Regular Meeting will be held on Tuesday September 16th, 2025 at 
3:00 P.M.. at City Hall Training Room. 
Public Comment 
No public comments. 
Adjourn  
The meeting was adjourned by Chair Dunn at 6:35 p.m. 
 
 
 
______________________________ 
 
 
 
______________________________ 
Lauren Schumann, Secretary                                           Boyd Dunn, Chair

Prepared by:
Economic Development Division
Micah Miranda, Director
Economic Update:
August 26, 2025
General Plan
Resident Advisory Committee

Targeted Industries
4
Automotive
Technology
Aviation & 
Aerospace
Advanced 
Business Svcs.
High-Tech
Manufacturing
Healthcare
IT & Software
Chandler Update
2
chandleraz.gov/ed

National Awards
Chandler Update
#5
Best City
for Women 
in Tech
#7
Best City to 
Find a Job
#6
Best City
for Families
#17
Best City
to Start a 
Business
#8
Best 
Untapped City 
for Startups
#11
Best City
for First-Time
Homebuyers
Sources: SmartAsset, Opendoor, WalletHub, Fundera, B2B Reviews, FT-Nikkei Investing in America
3
chandleraz.gov/ed

Chandler Stats
Chandler Update
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
90,533
176,581
236,123
275,987
294,900 (proj.)
Sources: ESRI Business Analyst (2025), U.S. Census Bureau, Arizona Office of Economic Opportunity, Maricopa Association of Governments, City of Chandler
Population Growth
% of Total Population
Ages 15 - 24: 13%
Ages 25 - 34: 15%
Ages 35 - 44: 14%
Ages 45 - 54: 14%
Ages 55 - 64: 12%
38 Yrs
Median Age
Working Age Population
4
chandleraz.gov/ed
Current estimate: 291,572

Chandler Stats
Chandler Update
49%
Chandler
34%
Arizona
37%
United States
Data Source: ESRI Business Analyst (2025)
Note: %Bachelor's Degree or Higher is for the population ages 25+
$116K
United States
$150K
Chandler
$115K
Arizona
%Bachelor's Degree or Higher
Avg. Household Income
5
chandleraz.gov/ed

Data Sources: MAG Employer Database and Bureau of Labor Statistics. Analysis based on "high-tech industries" per the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
"East Valley" includes Chandler, Gilbert, Mesa and Tempe.
Innovation Economy: % of Workers in High-Tech Industries
27%
Chandler
15%
East Valley
10%
United States
•
Chandler has an innovation mindset and this is reflected in the companies located in 
our community. Ability to adapt to a changing global economy helps ensure long-term 
economic sustainability.
Chandler Stats
Chandler Update
6
chandleraz.gov/ed

Target Industry Employment
7
•
Chandler has experienced strong job growth while achieving a beneficial 
increase in diversification across key industries over the past 20 years.
14,210
4,710
1,780
3,520
19,900
14,660
5,700
6,440
27,230
15,210
12,510
13,300
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
High-Tech Manufacturing &
Development
Business Services
Finance, Insurance, & Real
Estate
Health Care
2003
2013
2023
Data Source: MAG Employer Database
Economic Development Update
+5,690
+7,330 
+9,950 
+550 
+3,920
+6,810 
+2,920 
+6,860

Data Source: MAG Employer Database
Employment Base
Top Industry Clusters by Employment: Chandler vs. MAG Region
Industry
2003
2013
2023
Positive
Trend?
%Jobs in
Chandler
Location
Quotient
%Jobs in
Chandler
Location
Quotient
%Jobs in
Chandler
Location
Quotient
High Tech Manufacturing
22.2%
4.48
20.7%
4.38
20.0%
4.56
Business Services
7.3%
0.63
15.3%
1.29
11.2%
0.92
Consumer Services
8.2%
0.99
9.1%
0.97
10.6%
0.95
Retail
10.0%
0.89
13.0%
1.13
10.7%
0.94
Finance, Insurance, 
& Real Estate
2.8%
0.33
5.9%
0.66
9.2%
1.10
Healthcare
5.5%
0.73
6.7%
0.65
9.8%
0.79
Education
6.8%
0.99
6.5%
0.73
7.0%
0.95
Construction
10.0%
0.96
5.9%
0.74
4.5%
0.62
Transportation & Dist.
6.0%
0.81
5.2%
0.76
4.5%
0.65
8
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Economic Development Update

Jobs to Households
9
Data Sources: MAG Employer Database (2021), ESRI Business Analyst (2021)
Data Sources: MAG Employer Database, American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates
95,940
116,980
135,910
84,762
91,969
105,611
2013
2018
2023
Jobs
Households
1.13
1.27
1.29
2013
2018
2023
Jobs vs. Households
Jobs per Household
•
Balance: Chandler continues to add jobs as its population grows.
Economic Development Update

39%
2013
49%
2023
Data Source: American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates
%Bachelor's Degree or Higher
(Population 25 years and over)
Median Household Income
(In 2023 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars)
Prosperous Community
10
Economic Development Update
$93,579
$105,393
2013
2023
•
Quality jobs bring educated residents and wealth to our community.

Chandler Population Pyramids
Chandler Update
Source: U.S. Census Bureau (American Community Survey, 1-Year Estimates)
11
chandleraz.gov/ed
10%
5%
0%
5%
10%
0-4
5-9
10-14
15-19
20-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65-69
70-74
75-79
80-84
85 and over
Men
2022
Women
2010
•
Chandler has been following 
national and state trends in 
that while the population is 
still growing (by attracting 
new residents), it has also 
continued to age.
•
These demographic shifts 
could have significant 
impacts on the city and our 
local economy.

Potential Challenges for Chandler
Chandler Update
12
chandleraz.gov/ed
• Labor force availability
• Consumer spending habits
• School enrollment
• Changing service expectations
• Sustainability of revenue streams
“Low fertility – and the aging population that it generates – implies fewer workers per capita and 
creates significant headwinds to economic growth, the fiscal sustainability of public benefit programs, 
and the trend of continuous improvement in living standards, as reflected in per capita incomes.”
White House (May 23, 2024)

Things to Think About
13
•
Demographic shifts and community impacts
•
Housing turnover, vertical development opportunities with an emphasis 
on 55+ housing
•
Infrastructure Investment to facilitate private sector investment with ROI:
•
Water and sewer infrastructure
•
Electrical generation and transition
•
“Shovel ready sites”
 
Economic Development Update

Chandler Update
14
chandleraz.gov/ed
Summary
•
Local economic trends are positive
•
Past infrastructure investments set stage for economic vitality
•
Chandler is well-positioned for future economic vitality, however:
• Realization of demographic shifts
• Addressing gaps in commercial real estate needs
• Commitment to high-quality growth
• Focused on the future

Residential Advisory Committee (RAC) 
Chandler General Plan Update
Tuesday, August 26, 2025 – Meeting #5

Meeting 
Agenda
Plan Drafting Schedule
Workshop 2 Update
Workshop 2 Input & GPU 
Applications
Upcoming Events

Plan Drafting 
Schedule
8/29/25 - Working Drafts City Staff
8/29/25 – RAC Plan Audit Deadline
9/12/25 – 1st Draft (City Staff & RAC)
9/16/25 – RAC meeting #6
9/19/25 – 1st Draft Comments Deadline
10/1/25 – 60 Day Public Review Draft
12/16/25 – Final RAC Meeting
1st Draft – will be an internal only 
word document in Konveio similar 
to the Plan Audit platform.
Acknowledgments
CHAPTER 1 – CHANDLER ENVISIONS
CHAPTER 2 – CHANDLER REIMAGINES
CHAPTER 3 – CHANDLER CONNECTS
CHAPTER 4 – CHANDLER SUSTAINS
CHAPTER 5 – CHANDLER IMPLEMENTS
Appendices

Workshop 2:
SCENARIOS
Chandler Listens - Chandler Museum
75 participants in person!
Virtual workshop 2: 
available online until 
August 31st
Project website:
Chandleraz.gov

Interim W2 Results – Vision 
• Likes that its concise
• Missing terms: 
Innovative, friendly, 
sustainable, fiscally 
responsible
• Replace resilient 
with vibrant
• Not sure what 
responsible 
development is

Vision 
Statement 
Revision
W2 Version:
Chandler is a welcoming and resilient city where 
families, businesses, and diverse communities grow 
together. With a strong foundation in education, safety, 
and responsible development, prioritize quality of life 
and opportunity for all generations. 
Revised:
Chandler is a welcoming and resilient city where 
families, businesses, and diverse communities grow 
together. With a strong foundation in education, safety, 
and responsible development, we are committed to 
preserving quality of life will continue to prioritize our
quality of life and opportunities for all generations. 
RAC Discussion & Action

Residential Mixed-Use Design Concept Models
1. Neighborhood - Residential Mixed Use Place Type - 20 units per acre
2. Regional Commercial - Residential Mixed Use Place Type – 45 units per 
acre
3. Employment – Residential Mixed Use Place Type - 65 units per acre
Workshop 1 - Ideas
Workshop 2 – Visual Concepts

Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use

Regional Commercial Residential Mixed Use

Employment Residential Mixed Use

General Plan Update - Application
Revised 3D models will be 
used the Immersion Lab 
and in Land Use Categories 
to help conceptionally 
define the Future Land Use 
Categories
Mixed Use Name Change:
• Neighborhood Mixed Use Residential to 
Neighborhood Residential with 
Integrated Uses
• Regional Commercial Mixed Use 
Residential to Regional Commercial 
Residential with Integrated Uses
• Employment Mixed Use Residential to 
Employment Residential with 
Integrated Uses
RAC Discussion & Input

Total Housing Gap 
-Through 2040-
24,600 Units – Needed to meet 
Missing Middle housing demand
Barrier: Lack of direction in the General Plan where missing middle housing may be an acceptable 
use.

Areas of Change

No Change Scenario – 13,462 housing units

Medium Density – 27,809 housing units

High Density – 56,129 housing units

Interim W2 Results – Housing Scenarios

General Plan Update Application
1 - Downtown Region
2 – North AZ Ave
3 – Airpark
4 - Price Road 
Corridor
5 – Medical / 
Regional Retail
6 – I-10 / Loop 202
7 – Alma School 
Corridor
RAC Discussion & Input

ChandlerTalks 2.0
Save the Date! 
Wednesday, 
October 15th
5:30 pm @
Chandler Center 
for the Arts
Small Infill Housing 
Developers 
Moderated by Elliot D. 
Pollack & Company

Mobile Immersion Lab – Virtual Reality
Save the Date! 
Tuesday, 
October 28th
11 am – 7 pm
@
SoHo63
63 E. Boston St.

THANK YOU
chandleraz.gov/generalplan
LOOKING AHEAD:
• Plan Audit Comments 
Due by 8/29
• Chandler Listens Workshop #2 
Virtual Live until August 30th
•
Next RAC Meeting: 
September 16, 2025 – TBD