Minutes of the Study Session held on February 23, 2026
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
48916 characters
Meeting Minutes
City Council Study Session
February 23, 2026 | 6:00 p.m.
Chandler City Council Chambers
88 E. Chicago St., Chandler, AZ
Call to Order
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Kevin Hartke at 6:52 p.m.
Roll Call
Council Attendance
Appointee Attendance
Mayor Kevin Hartke
John Pombier, City Manager
Vice Mayor Angel Encinas
Kelly Schwab, City Attorney
Councilmember Christine Ellis*
Jennifer Ekblad, City Clerk
Councilmember Jane Poston
Councilmember Matt Orlando
Councilmember OD Harris
Councilmember Jennifer Hawkins
*Councilmember Ellis attended virtually.
Consent Agenda and Discussion
Budget and Policy
1.
Resolution No. 5981, Adoption of Updated Pension Funding Policy
Move City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 5981, adopting the updated Pension
Funding Policy which accepts the city’s share of assets and liabilities under the Public Safety
Personnel Retirement System (PSPRS) June 30, 2025, Actuarial Valuation Report.
City Clerk
2.
Approval of Minutes
Move City Council approve the Council meeting minutes of the City Council Special Meeting
held on February 2, 2026, the City Council Work Session held on February 2, 2026, the City
Page 2 of 20
Council Study Session held on February 2, 2026, the City Council Work Session held on
February 5, 2026, and the City Council Regular Meeting held on February 5, 2026.
3.
Boards and Commissions Member Appointments
Move City Council approve the Board and Commission appointments as recommended.
City Manager
4.
Resolution No. 5957, Authorizing the Agreement with Salt River Project to Conduct the
Annual City of Chandler Family Bike Ride
Move City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 5957 authorizing the execution of a
license to use Salt River Project property, located at the consolidated canal between
Germann Road and Chandler Boulevard, to conduct the annual City of Chandler Family Bike
Ride.
5.
Resolution No. 5974, Authorizing the Submittal of Applications for Indian Gaming Revenue
Sharing Grant to Gila River Indian Community
Move City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 5974 authorizing the submittal of Indian
Gaming Revenue Sharing Grant Applications to Gila River Indian Community for $320,125
for the Chandler Fire Department to purchase Hurst Combi Tools ("Jaws of Life") for Engine
and Low Acuity units with newer E3 battery technology and $187,047.25 for the Chandler
Police Department to purchase a Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer (GCMS) to
participate in the Global Uniform Analysis and Reporting of Drug-related Substances
(GUARDS) .
6.
Resolution No. 5975, Authorizing the Submittal Pass-Through Indian Gaming Applications
to Gila River Indian Community
Move City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 5975 authorizing the submittal of pass-
through Indian Gaming Revenue Sharing Grant Applications to the Gila River Indian
Community of $25,000 from Arizona FACTS of LIFE for Summer Youth Program, $183,000
from AZCEND for Drive to Deliver vehicle replacement, $20,000 from Chandler Cultural
Foundation for Connect Kids Program, $130,000 from Chandler Education Foundation for
Chandler Unified POW WOW, $100,000 from Dignity Health Foundation for Oral Health
Connect: Bridging Care from Hospital to Home, $40,000 ($20,000 per year for two years),
from Firewheel STEM Institute for STEM Enrichment Programming, $100,000 for Positive
Youth Development, and $25,000 from Matthew’s Crossing for Emergency Food Assistance
Programs.
7.
Resolution No. 5976, Authorizing the Submittal Pass-Through Indian Gaming Applications
Ft. McDowell Yavapai Nation
Move City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 5976 authorizing the submittal of pass-
through Indian Gaming Revenue Sharing Grant Applications to Ft. McDowell Yavapai Nation
Page 3 of 20
of $75,000 from AZCEND for NourishPlus Nutritional Program for seniors and adults with
disabilities, and $15,000 from Firewheel STEM Institute for Firewheel Mobile STEM Center.
8.
Resolution No. 5977, Authorizing the Submittal Pass-Through Indian Gaming Application To
Tohono O’odham Nation
Move City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 5977 authorizing the submittal of pass-
through Indian Gaming Revenue Sharing Grant Application to the Tohono O’odham Nation
of $50,000 from AZCEND for the Family Resource Center Early Literacy Program.
9.
Resolution No. 5978, Authorizing the Submittal Pass-Through Indian Gaming Application To
Ak-Chin Indian Community
Move City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 5978 authorizing the submittal of pass-
through Indian Gaming Revenue Sharing Grant Application to Ak-Chin Indian Community
of $150,000 from Dignity Health foundation for Histotripsy A Transformative Advance in
Noninvasive Cancer Therapy.
MAYOR HARTKE announced that several attendees were invited for gaming grant items five
through nine. He invited them to introduce themselves, and state the organization receiving the
grant:
Sandra Bassett, Chandler Cultural Foundation – Connecting Kids Program and Camp Kids
Fredi Lajvardi, Firewheel STEM Institute
Jennifer Hewitt, Chandler Education Foundation
Yolanda Robinson, Arizona Facts of Life
Jennifer Francisco, Matthew’s Crossing Food Bank
Becky Hines, ICAN Positive Programs for Youth
Laurel Vetsch, Dignity Health Foundation East Valley
Shelley Nelson, AZCEND
10.
Resolution No. 5986, Authorizing a Section 5310 Grant Application of $90,000 for Chandler
Flex Operations
Move City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 5986, authorizing a grant application for
and acceptance of grant funds from the Section 5310 federal grant program in the amount
of $90,000.
11.
Resolution No. 5985, Authorizing SRP License Agreement for Kyrene Branch and Highline
Canal Paths
Move City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 5985 authorizing the execution of a
license agreement with Salt River Project (SRP), granting the City access to construct,
maintain and operate the Kyrene Branch and Highline Canal Shared Use Paths.
Page 4 of 20
Community Services
12.
Agreement for Park Restroom Cleaning Services
Move City Council approve Agreement No. CS5-910-4862, Amendment No. 1, with UBM
Enterprise, Inc., for park restroom cleaning services, in an amount not to exceed $183,500
for the period of one year beginning January 24, 2026, through January 23, 2027.
Fire Department
13.
Purchase of Fire Turnouts and PPE
Move City Council approve Agreement No. FD2-340-4440, Amendment No. 3, with LN Curtis,
Swift Group, Velocity Fire, and United Fire, for fire turnouts and PPE, in a combined amount
not to exceed $1,100,000, for a one-year term, February 1, 2026, through January 31, 2027.
14.
Purchase of Ten Cardiac Monitors
Move City Council approve the purchase of ten cardiac monitors, from Zoll Medical
Corporation, utilizing the State of Arizona Contract No. CTR073591, in an amount not to
exceed $592,642.73.
15.
Purchase of Portable Radios for the Chandler Fire Department (CFD)
Move City Council approve the purchase of portable radios, from Motorola Solutions,
utilizing the State of Arizona Contract No. CTR046830, in the amount of $239,423.10.
16.
Purchase of Fire Emergency Medical Supplies
Move City Council approve Agreement No. FD4-345-4690, Amendment No. 4, with Bound
Tree Medical, LLC, for fire emergency medical supplies, in an amount not to exceed
$1,000,000, for a one-year period, April 1, 2026, through March 31, 2027.
KEITH HARGIS, Assistant Fire Chief, presented an update on the EMS supply purchasing contract,
which represents a significant increase compared to previous contracts. This increase is largely
due to the ramp-up of the ambulance transportation service system being implemented in the
community. The funding allocated will cover stocking the ambulances and ongoing supplies
necessary to initiate the service during the first six months. Assistant Chief Hargis expressed
gratitude to the City Council for its support of this transformative project, emphasizing its
importance in enhancing emergency medical care and stabilizing healthcare access for residents.
The entire department, along with the City Manager's Office, has been working diligently to ensure
a successful rollout of the service. The approach to this initiative includes training for the
department's members, drawing on their previous experience with ambulance operations.
Additionally, the city has hired an ambulance transportation manager and an analyst, both of
whom bring substantial expertise in the business side of EMS. Assistant Chief Hargis noted that
12 firefighters are currently undergoing training at the fire academy. The agenda also includes
purchasing items such as cardiac monitors and radios specific to the ambulance service. Future
contracts will focus on billing services essential for financial operations. The first of the ten new
ambulances is expected to arrive in March, with additional units scheduled to come in batches
Page 5 of 20
between May and September. This preparation aims to ensure the service is operational by
January 2027.
COUNCILMEMBER HARRIS thanked the chief and expressed appreciation for the progress on the
item. He stated that the initiative had once seemed stalled, but is now moving forward, where it
can grow and succeed. He explained that the city is developing an important lifesaving service that
had previously been handled through a third party. By bringing it in-house, the city will be able to
provide residents with an even higher level of service while maintaining greater control over
operations and participating directly in lifesaving efforts. Councilmember Harris also commended
the Fire Department for its dedication to helping residents during their most difficult moments,
noting the important role firefighters played during the COVID-19 pandemic. He added that this
effort is especially important as the community’s senior population continues to grow. He
concluded by congratulating the department and saying he looks forward to the day the city sends
out its first ambulance under the new program, adding that firefighters are cross trained as both
firefighters and paramedics.
ASSISTANT CHIEF HARGIS confirmed that it was correct.
COUNCILMEMBER HARRIS asked for a brief overview of paramedic training, focusing on a few key
responsibilities.
ASSISTANT CHIEF HARGIS explained that each fire truck currently has at least two paramedics and
that firefighters also staff the ambulances operating in the city through a public-private
partnership. In that arrangement, a third party provides the ambulance and EMT driver, while the
city provides the firefighter-paramedic responsible for patient care. He said the new model will
allow the city to take over the ambulance and driver roles, giving the department full control of
operations. Additional training will be needed for EMTs to operate the vehicles and for
documentation processes. Assistant Fire Chief Hargis added that reliable medical transportation
is essential because patients cannot be transported in fire trucks. He said bringing the service in-
house will allow the department to be more responsive and provide the best possible care, and
that the team is excited and ready to move forward.
COUNCILMEMBER HARRIS thanked the department and stated that he was glad to partner in
supporting the effort.
MAYOR HARTKE asked for confirmation that the program would not only improve service for
residents but would also operate as an enterprise fund. He asked whether the additional revenue
generated from ambulance transport would help offset the costs and ultimately support providing
this service to the community.
ASSISTANT CHIEF HARGIS confirmed that the program is projected to operate as a self-sustaining
enterprise fund and said it is expected to provide strong value to the community as it grows.
Page 6 of 20
Human Resources
17.
Agreement for Temporary Staffing Services
Move City Council approve Agreement No. HR9-962-4689, Amendment No. 2, with
Marathon Staffing, for temporary staffing services, in an amount not to exceed $1,079,378,
for a one-year term, April 1, 2026, through March 31, 2027.
Information Technology
18.
Purchase of Customer Engagement Portal and Relationship Management Software
Move City Council approve Agreement No. 4577, Amendment No. 1, with N. Harris
Computer Corporation, for the implementation of Infinity CIS Version 5, to include the
customer engagement portal and Solid Waste relationship management software, in an
amount not to exceed $1,095,512.
KRISTA MIKESELL, IT Application Services Manager, presented the following presentation.
• Utility Services Customer Engagement Portal
• Utility Billing Platform – History & Timeline
o Planning
Software Upgrades
Move Cloud
o Prepare
Customer Engagement Portal
Field Work Order System
System Configuration and Testing
Communication Strategy
o 2014, 2023, 2025, 2026, 2027
o Implementation
Internal Utility Billing System
Customer Engagement Portal
Field Work Order System
o Prepare
Internal Utility Billing System
System Configuration and Testing
o Cloud Implementation
Internal Utility Billing System
Customer Engagement Portal
Field Work Order System
• Current Customer Portal Limitations
o Incompatible with the new cloud utility billing platform
o System cannot be enhanced to meet future conservation needs
o Platform is nearing end-of-life, increasing operational risk
o Limited access to digital bill history
• Current Customer Engagement Portal (CEP)
Page 7 of 20
• New CEP Key Features
o Water usage displayed daily using Automated Meter Infrastructure (AMI)
o Enhanced water consumption graphs and visualizations
o Utility billing graphs by dollar amounts
o Ability to export usage and billing history to Excel
• New CEP Key Features
o Mobile phone app capability
o Expanded availability of billing images online
o Improved paperless enrollment
o Customizable dashboard
o Exploring Move-In/Move-Out online request
• Graphs by Consumption Example
• Graphs by Billed Dollars Example
• Transaction History Example
• Personalized Alerts Example
• Community Approach
o Internal Communications
Staff awareness and readiness updates
Training and support preparation
o Community Communications
Advance notice of CEP launch
Education on portal benefits and features
Account setup guidance
Support and assistance resources
• Questions
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked whether the timeline was short because the city would be
using off-the-shelf software that would be modified or because the city would be developing its
own software.
MS. MIKESELL said the software is off the shelf.
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO noted that the timeline seemed to indicate minimal work on the
city’s part and asked whether any tailoring or additional work would be required locally.
MS. MIKESELL confirmed that the city will need to work with IT and business units on configuration
and integration once requirements are defined.
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO inquired about how many cities or towns are currently utilizing this.
MS. MIKESELL noted that she knows at least one local contact and a few others but did not have
their names available.
Page 8 of 20
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked if they were experiencing any problems with the rollout of
this initiative or anything related to it.
MS. MIKESELL noted that, to her knowledge, there are no issues with the rollout. She mentioned
that another city in a different state has undergone a similar transition from an on-premises
solution to a cloud-based system. Ms. Mikesell has a contact at that city who is more of an IT
specialist, and she has been meeting with her regularly.
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO expressed excitement about the project, noting that it could reduce
residents' anxiety. He shared a personal story about quickly noticing a drop in his water bill,
emphasizing the value of better tools for managing water resources. He said he looks forward to
using the technology and asked whether the service would be accessible on both a computer and
an app.
MS. MIKESELL confirmed that’s correct.
MAYOR HARTKE stressed that the program will improve water tracking and protect resources and
thanked everyone for their efforts.
19.
Purchase of Fiber Equipment for Data Center Fiber Refresh
Move City Council approve the purchase of fiber equipment for the data center fiber
refresh, utilizing the State of Arizona Contract No. CTR062464, with Tel Tech Networks Inc.,
in an amount not to exceed $230,279.
Law
20.
Settlement in Weinstein vs. City of Chandler
Move City Council approve the settlement in the matter of Weinstein vs. City of Chandler in
full and final satisfaction of all claims asserted without admitting liability for the amount of
$350,000 and further authorize the City Attorney to sign any necessary documents in such
forms as are approved by the City Attorney to effectuate the terms and conditions of
settlement of this matter.
Management Services
21.
Agreement for Phase 2 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit Post-Construction
Program Implementation
Move City Council approve Agreement No. 5042, with Hazen and Sawyer, PC, for the phase
2 municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) permit post-construction program
implementation, in an amount not to exceed $190,000.
22.
License Series 7, Beer and Wine Bar Liquor License Application for Theresa June Morse,
Agent, Hotter, Drier, Broke-r, LLC, DBA Casual Pint
Page 9 of 20
Move for recommendation to the State Department of Liquor Licenses and Control for
approval of the State Liquor Job No. 375874, a Series 7, Beer and Wine Bar Liquor License,
for Theresa June Morse, Agent, Hotter, Drier, Broke-r, LLC, DBA Casual Pint, located at 1095
W. Queen Creek Road, Suite 8, and approval of the City of Chandler, Series 7, Beer and Wine
Bar Liquor License No. 311004.
23.
New License Series 7, Beer and Wine Bar Liquor License Application for Andrea Dahlman
Lewkowitz, Agent, Candeeland AZ, LLC, DBA Candeeland
Move for recommendation to the State Department of Liquor Licenses and Control for
approval of the State Liquor Job No. 372003, a Series 7, Beer and Wine Bar Liquor License,
for Andrea Dahlman Lewkowitz, Agent, Candeeland AZ, LLC, DBA Candeeland, located at
5955 W. Ray Road, Suite 15, and approval of the City of Chandler, Series 7, Beer and Wine
Bar Liquor License No. 309189.
Neighborhood Resources
24.
Resolution No. 5980, Approving an Amendment to Add the City of Goodyear as a Member
of the Maricopa HOME Consortium
Move City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 5980, amending the Maricopa HOME
Consortium Intergovernmental Agreement (“IGA”) for the period of July 1, 2023, through
June 30, 2026, to add the City of Goodyear as a participating member.
25.
Agreement for Non-Profit Blueprint Program
Move City Council approve Agreement No. 5037, with Chandler Chamber of Commerce, for
the Non-Profit Blueprint program, in an amount not to exceed $160,000, for the period of
one year, beginning April 1, 2026, through March 31, 2027, with the option of up to four
one-year extensions.
RIANN BALCH, Neighborhood Resources Director, presented the following presentation.
• The Nonprofit Blueprint
• Program Overview
o Partnership between the Chandler Chamber of Commerce & City of Chandler to build
capacity for eligible non-profit organizations serving Chandler
o Cohort of 15 agencies will participate in four group training sessions, coaching sessions
and networking activities over a none-month period
o Focuses on improving systems, governance, and funding readiness
o Each nonprofit completing the program receives a $5,000 capacity-building award and
a non-profit blueprint membership
• Group Training
o Session 1 – Training and Governance
o Session 2 – Strategies, Program and Impact
o Session 3 - Funding and Financial Readiness
o Session 4 – Communications and Sustainability
Page 10 of 20
• Coaching and Technical Assistance
o Writing or revising a strategic plan
o Internal systems and process setup
o Evaluation frameworks and data collection practices
o Template creation (budgets, bylaws, strategic plan outlines)
o Policy development assistance
o Marketing material review
o Website and social media guidance
• Capacity Building Award
Upon completing the program requirements, each participating nonprofit will receive a $5,000
capacity-building award for:
o Operational improvements
o Consultant support
o Technology upgrades
o Staff & volunteer training
o Marketing or communications needs
• Blueprint Membership Benefits
As part of the program, the Chandler Chamber will offer:
o Professional headshots
o Business & marketing resources
o Opportunities for networking – free admission to Chamber networking events
o Recognition by City of Chandler and Chandler Chamber of Commerce
• Anticipated Timeline
• Questions
MAYOR HARTKE noted that many small organizations seek city funds but often lack capacity or
alignment with the city’s vision. He expressed excitement about supporting nonprofits, thanked
Ms. Balch and the Chamber, and looks forward to updates from the first cohort after September.
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO inquired whether the selection criteria focus mainly on residents of
Chandler or on Chandler-based businesses intending to start nonprofits.
MS. BALCH mentioned that the city is seeking organizations that serve Chandler residents. Some
organizations may not be physically located in Chandler but still serve its residents, which is part
of the eligibility criteria. Additionally, other criteria include factors like organization size, number
of employees, and budget.
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO noted that although the Chamber does strong work in many areas,
he came to understand that the education component running this program operates as a
separate 501(c) organization and is not directly connected to the Chamber’s core business
activities.
Page 11 of 20
MS. BALCH confirmed that the Chandler Chamber Community Foundation applied for this
program, bringing valuable knowledge and expertise.
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO noted that, as shown on the slide, the program allows participants
to network at events for educational and relationship-building purposes, with grants coming later.
He asked if that aspect is included in the contract.
MS. BALCH stated that they do, and one of the reasons they consider the Chamber an ideal
partner is because of its extensive network. The Chamber can effectively introduce emerging
nonprofits to the broader Chandler community network, which is a significant advantage for them.
COUNCILMEMBER HAWKINS asked whether participation in the program is a one-time
opportunity or if individuals could repeat it under any circumstances.
MS. BALCH explained that the program is intended as a one-time, capacity-building initiative. Since
this is our first year as a pilot, we haven't yet considered what might happen if a nonprofit returns
in the future. This is a topic for further discussion, but the goal is to support 15 new organizations
in the year.
COUNCILMEMBER HARRIS stated that he hopes Chandler-based nonprofits receive the
opportunity, emphasizing that the funding comes from Chandler residents and should support
local applicants.
Public Works and Utilities
26.
Introduction and Tentative Adoption of Ordinance No. 5153, Approving the Abandonment
of a Temporary Drainage Easement Located on the West Side of Lot 3, in the Chandler
Airport Business Park that is no Longer Needed for Public Use
Move City Council introduce and tentatively adopt Ordinance No. 5153 approving the
abandonment of a temporary drainage easement located on the west side of Lot 3, in the
Chandler Airport Business Park that is no longer needed for public use.
27.
Professional Services Agreement, Amendment No. 4, with Nfra, Inc., for the Delaware Street
Parking Lot Improvements Design Services Located at 101 N Delaware Street, Chandler, AZ
85225
Move City Council award Professional Services Agreement No. ST2308.201, Amendment No.
4, to Nfra, Inc., for the Delaware Street Parking Lot Improvements Design Services,
increasing the agreement amount by $61,767.
28.
Construction Services Agreement with Salt River Project (SRP), for the Chandler Heights
Road Improvements (McQueen Road to Gilbert Road) Removal of Overhead Electrical
Distribution Lines
Page 12 of 20
Move City Council award Construction Services Agreement No. ST1614.512, SRP Contract
No. 4224831, to SRP, for the Chandler Heights Road Improvements (McQueen Road to
Gilbert Road) removal of overhead electrical distribution lines, in an amount not to exceed
$102,547.78.
29.
Construction Services Agreement with Salt River Project (SRP), for the Chandler Heights
Road Improvements (McQueen Road to Gilbert Road) Underground Conversion of the
Electrical Distribution Lines
Move City Council award Construction Services Agreement No. ST1614.511, SRP Contract
No. 4227459, to SRP, for the Chandler Heights Road Improvements (McQueen Road to
Gilbert Road) underground conversion of electrical distribution lines, in an amount not to
exceed $782,712.
30.
Rental of Belt Filter Press for the Pecos Surface Water Treatment Plant
Move City Council approve the competition impracticable purchase for the rental of a belt
filter press, from Phoenix Process Equipment Co., for a period of two years, in an amount
not to exceed $392,300.
Action Agenda
31.
Resolution No. 5966, Amending the Citywide Fee Schedule relating to Community
Services, Cultural Development, Police, and Public Works & Utilities Departments
Move City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 5966 amending the Citywide Fee Schedule
relating to Community Services, Cultural Development, Police, and Public
Works
&
Utilities Departments, with fee changes effective March 2, 2026.
Public Hearing
32.
Proposed Local Alternative Expenditure Limitation - Home Rule Option Election, Second
Public Hearing
1. Open Public Hearing
2. Staff Presentation
3. Council Discussion
4. Discussion from the Audience
5. Close Public Hearing
Discussion
33.
Discussion of Implementing an Ethics Policy and Possible Direction to Staff to Review and
Return with Recommendations, as Requested by Councilmember Poston
COUNCILMEMBER POSTON explained that she brought this item forward to request staff time to
research an ethics policy for the Council, emphasizing that it affects the entire. She noted that
Page 13 of 20
ethics policies are standard in large organizations, employees are expected to follow them, and
it’s reasonable for the Council to do the same. She said the idea has been raised by the community
and partners, including the Chandler Chamber of Commerce listing it in their legislative agenda
document “How We Stand”, and discussed previously by the charter committee, though she
doesn’t believe the charter is the right place for it. She noted that other cities, like Mesa, have
robust policies covering both councils and boards. Councilmember Poston clarified that she is not
proposing a specific policy tonight but is seeking a discussion and direction for staff to explore
options. She outlined that it could take various forms, such as a charter amendment, resolution,
ordinance, or Council policy, and stressed that the goal is proactive planning to prevent future
issues rather than addressing a current problem. She invited fellow councilmembers to discuss.
MAYOR HARTKE asked for clarification on Councilmember Poston’s last point, noting that he
wondered what specific problem the policy is intended to solve. He acknowledged that no current
issue exists but asked her to give an example of what such an ethics policy could address or
accomplish.
COUNCILMEMBER POSTON explained that ethics policies can range from detailed to more general
and could address topics such as social media conduct or the acceptance of meals. She said the
primary reason for exploring the policy is that community members have asked Council to look
into it. She added that the City Charter Amendment Resident Advisory Committee and the
Chamber of Commerce have both spent significant time discussing the topic, and she believes it
is important for the Council to be responsive to the community by reviewing the issue and
considering possible options.
MAYOR HARTKE asked again what specific problem the policy is intended to solve. He asked
whether there is a particular issue the policy would address, or whether the intent is simply to
explore whether a problem exists and determine whether a policy is needed.
COUNCILMEMBER POSTON said she is seeking to establish a process before any issue arises,
emphasizing the importance of proactivity rather than reactivity. She noted that community
members, along with two respected organizations, have asked the Council to consider the topic,
and she believes it is appropriate for the Council to review it now and plan for the future.
MAYOR HARTKE asked whether it might make sense to refer the issue back to the Charter Review
Committee to reconsider and bring back recommendations, noting that there is time between
now and June for them to revisit it.
COUNCILMEMBER POSTON said she does not believe the Charter Review Committee is the
appropriate place to revisit the issue because its role is focused on matters that belong in the city
charter. She explained that she is not convinced an ethics policy should be placed in the charter
and noted it could instead take other forms, such as an ordinance, a commission, a resolution, or
a council policy and procedure. She added that the committee already had discussion on the topic
Page 14 of 20
and that placing it on the ballot as a charter amendment may not be the right approach within a
short timeframe. Instead, she believes city staff are better positioned to review the issue, conduct
research, and provide options for the Council to consider.
MAYOR HARKE said his concern is that if changes are made outside the charter, they may not be
enforceable. He noted that ordinances can be changed by future councils and questioned whether
an ordinance would provide sufficient authority, particularly if the issue involves discipline. He
said that is why he is raising the question.
COUNCILMEMBER POSTON responded that the Council has already signed an anti-bullying and
anti-harassment policy that does not necessarily include strong enforcement mechanisms. She
said that if enforcement is a concern, the Council could examine that as well, but she would prefer
to take a broader look at developing an overall ethics policy.
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO inquired whether there is an ethics policy for the staff.
KELLY SCHWAB, City Attorney, explained that the city has various personnel rules and
administrative regulations that guide staff conduct, including ethical matters, social media use,
and participation in elections. She noted that, while there is no single formal ethics policy, many
of these standards are addressed throughout existing rules and regulations.
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO said reviewing the issue is a good place to start and that he supports
examining what already exists. He noted he was not aware of the current policies mentioned and
said the Council could consider something simple, even if it were placed in the charter, though he
was not specifically recommending that approach. He emphasized that this request is simply for
additional information and discussion, similar to other requests made by councilmembers that
require staff time. He said the Council does not yet know what the outcome might look like,
whether a resolution, policy, ordinance, or another approach, but believes it is reasonable to
conduct due diligence, review what is already in place, and then discuss the findings in a future
work session before deciding whether to move forward.
COUNCILMEMBER HAWKINS said she sees value in going through the charter because residents
should have input on what a Council ethics policy looks like and what they expect. She shared a
concern that a policy without enforcement may not have a meaningful impact.
COUNCILMEMBER ELLIS said her main concern is that an ethics policy could be misused by the
Council to target each other. She noted that without involving the public through the charter,
enforcement would fall to councilmembers themselves, which could lead to disputes over
personal or professional actions unrelated to official duties. She emphasized that accountability
already exists when councilmembers act in their official roles, but the Council should not interfere
with personal or business matters outside of their city responsibilities. She stated that if an ethics
Page 15 of 20
policy moves forward, it should go through the charter process so residents can provide input and
ultimately decide its validity.
COUNCILMEMBER POSTON said she values the diverse opinions on the topic, noting that her own
research revealed many possible approaches. She explained that while the Charter Committee
could be involved, city staff are better positioned to thoroughly review the issue and provide
guidance, as it falls within their expertise and resources. She emphasized that staff could start by
reviewing the Charter Committee’s prior work and the Chamber’s recommendations, both of
which carry significant input. She clarified that she does not see one group as better than the
other but believes city staff should lead the review rather than convening the Charter Committee
quickly, which would not allow enough time for a thoughtful process.
MAYOR HARTKE asked City Attorney Kelly Schwab for the Charter Committee's timeline if the
Council wanted to place something on the next election ballot, specifically, whether the deadline
is in June.
JENNIFER EKBLAD, City Clerk, confirmed that June 22 is the deadline for ballot language for the
next election.
COUNCILMEMBER ELLIS said this was the first time hearing that the Chandler Chamber of
Commerce had requested the City Council establish an ethics committee. She stated that the
Chamber’s president had never approached her on the matter and that she had not been asked
for an opinion or input. Councilmember Ellis also questioned which organizations Councilmember
Poston was referring to as requesting it.
COUNCILMEMBER POSTON said the topic came from Charter Committee discussions and is
included in the Chandler Chamber’s “How We Stand” document, developed by committees of
Chamber members and volunteers. Councilmember Poston clarified that the request was only for
staff to review the issue, not to propose a specific policy.
COUNCILMEMBER ELLIS said she had attended the Chandler Chamber’s “How We Stand”
committee meetings for several years and noted that ethics had not been a major focus. She asked
what specific issues an ethics committee would address and whether topics like donations, meals,
or councilmember conduct might be included.
COUNCILMEMBER POSTON noted the issue had appeared in the Chandler Chamber’s “How We
Stand” document before. She emphasized the importance of reviewing it to understand what
prompted its inclusion and the concerns behind it. She noted that Terri Kimble, Chandler Chamber
President/CEO, said the issue has been in the Chamber’s “How We Stand” document for several
years. She emphasized understanding why it resurfaced, consulting Chamber members, and
listening to stakeholders, not any single organization, while remaining open to Councilmember
Ellis’s points.
Page 16 of 20
COUNCILMEMBER ELLIS asked the City Manager whether staff have the capacity to quickly review
this issue, given current demands from home rule, elections, and ongoing planning.
JOHN POMBIER, City Manager, said he appreciates the question and noted that staff is currently
busy in the budget season. He explained that whether the task comes from the Charter Committee
or the Council, staff would handle the necessary work. If it becomes a Council priority, staff will do
their best to meet the Mayor and Council’s needs despite their current workload.
COUNCILMEMBER ELLIS asked if staff would still handle the work if the matter is sent back to the
Charter Committee.
MR. POMBIER confirmed that staff supports the Charter Committee and would conduct any
necessary research or investigations, bringing the results back to the committee. He noted that
committee members could also do their own research or request staff assistance.
COUNCILMEMBER ELLIS said staff will be involved whether this discussion was brought to the
Charter Resident Advisory Committee or if it was done due to Councilmember request.
COUNCILMEMBER POSTON said that as a councilmember, she could ask staff to spend about four
hours researching the issue. She acknowledged being surprised by the differing perspectives and
agreed with Councilmember Ellis that it is concerning when policies are misused in other cities.
She added that this Council is well-respected and well-suited to proactively review the matter. She
noted that while she was willing to dedicate staff time to research, she felt this discussion with the
full Council was the appropriate forum to gather feedback.
VICE MAYOR ENCINAS said that as elected officials, they have a responsibility to lead the city and
be accountable to residents. He views this as a matter of accountability and transparency and is
open to learning more about what an ethics mechanism might look like. He raised questions about
its structure, timing, boundaries, who could file a claim, and what consequences would follow if a
claim were validated. He said he is open to staff researching the issue and bringing the findings
back to the Council.
MAYOR HARTKE asked the City Attorney to clarify the rules, noting that a single councilmember
can request up to four hours of staff time, but anything beyond that requires a majority of the
Council. He then asked what a good approach would be to determine whether there is Council
interest in pursuing this issue, given that it is Monday and the Council meets again on Thursday.
MS. SCHWAB explained that because the issue affects the Council, staff needs majority direction
to proceed. The topic can be discussed in a study session and revisited on Thursday for guidance.
If an ordinance or resolution is needed, direction would be given then, but nothing would be ready
by Thursday, only discussion and initial guidance.
Page 17 of 20
COUNCILMEMBER HARRIS asked the City Attorney to explain the Council’s existing onboarding
process for transparency and conflict of interest law. Councilmember Harris noted that if a
councilmember is business owner, they must disclose contracts and business relationships within
the city. The City Attorney then advises if a vote presents a direct conflict. He requested a summary
of the key disclosures and guidance normally provided to new councilmembers.
MS. SCHWAB explained that during onboarding, she meets with each councilmember individually
to review key requirements. This includes Arizona’s open meeting law, how to conduct meetings
without violations, and conflict of interest law, including potential legal penalties for violations.
She noted that ongoing dialogue is maintained to address any concerns about conflicts. She also
reviewed the city’s anti-bullying and anti-harassment policies, council rules and procedures
governing agenda items and staff time, and charter requirements specifying that the city manager
directs staff while the Council handles operational matters through the manager.
COUNCILMEMBER HARRIS explained that he asked the question to better understand the existing
guidance and requested that the City Manager outline the city’s rules and policies related to ethics,
noting that the City Attorney had already covered some of the topic.
MR. POMBIER said the city has administrative regulations and policies that guide how employees
interact with the public and each other. While they don’t create a formal ethics policy, these rules
outline expected behavior, including restrictions on gifts, and are updated as new situations arise.
He cited bullying and sexual harassment policies as examples that help establish the ethical
standards for employees at work.
COUNCILMEMBER HARRIS said Council rules and staff policies already guide actions, but he
questioned whether Councilmember Poston had used her four-hour staff limit and if more time
was needed. He suggested using the Charter Committee, which already has staff support, to
address the issue. Councilmember Harris emphasized clearly defining the problem, noted existing
accountability through elections and resident input, and cautioned against policies that could be
misused.
COUNCILMEMBER POSTON asked the Council whether members wanted to include or exclude
people who have opinions on the issue but are not part of the Charter Committee. She noted this
is why she prefers starting with staff before moving to the committee. She also agreed with
Councilmember Orlando’s suggestion to begin by reviewing existing city staff policies but
emphasized that input from those who have been engaged with the issue for seven years should
also be considered.
COUNCILMEMBER HARRIS said he thinks the process should start with Councilmember Poston
using her allotted four hours of staff time. He explained that she should direct staff, gather
information, and then return to the Council with what was accomplished. If more time is needed,
additional hours could be requested later. Councilmember Harris emphasized that using the four
Page 18 of 20
hours first ensures staff work is focused and productive, rather than seeking Council approval
before any consensus. He explained that her four hours of staff time allows her to define the
problem, give staff direction, and gather information efficiently. Councilmember Harris suggested
she use that time first, and if more is needed, she can return to the Council to request additional
hours. This ensures that any staff work is focused and tied to a clearly identified problem before
seeking broader Council support.
COUNCILMEMBER POSTON stated that she is asking the Council as a whole to lead on this issue,
not her personally.
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO said that the main challenge isn’t the amount of staff time, but
implementing a policy that affects the Council. Councilmember Orlando asked whether there were
any issues leading Council to implement the anti-bullying policy or non-discrimination ordinance.
MS. SCHWAB said she is not aware of any specific issues.
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked whether there was a specific issue that prompted the
adoption of the non-discrimination ordinance.
MS. SCHWAB said she is not aware of any specific issue that prompted the adoption of the non-
discrimination ordinance.
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO said those policies were educational, providing guidelines so that if
bullying or discrimination occurred, there would be a document outlining how to handle it. He
noted that this is essentially what Councilmember Poston is saying.
COUNCILMEMBER HARRIS said he is not disagreeing with the idea or the principle behind it.
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO said the purpose of policies like anti-bullying and non-discrimination
ordinances is not to address a specific problem, but to provide guidance in case an issue arises.
He explained that the proposed ethics policy would serve the same proactive purpose. He
emphasized that the Council is simply asking questions, gathering information, and exploring
options, such as whether the charter could address it before making any decisions. He suggested
moving forward to get answers so the Council can deliberate, noting that they may ultimately
decide to proceed or not.
COUNCILMEMBER HARRIS said his concern isn’t with the policy itself, but with ensuring a clear and
effective process. He suggested that Councilmember Poston use her allotted four hours of staff
time to gather information, define the problem, and direct staff. Once that work is complete, she
can return to the Council to request additional time if needed. Councilmember Harris emphasized
that staff should receive specific guidance rather than broad directions, so the Council can later
have a productive discussion and develop a targeted policy that addresses the problem.
Page 19 of 20
COUNCILMEMBER POSTON said she has repeatedly explained that the problem she’s trying to
address comes from resident concerns and that she is being responsive. Councilmember Poston
noted that her efforts so far raised more questions than answers, which is why she brought it to
Council. She said she is willing to lead with discretion if the Council directs it.
COUNCILMEMBER ELLIS said that bullying and discrimination were real issues in the community,
citing schools, students, and residents as examples, even if there wasn’t a specific complaint on
Council. She emphasized that past policies were meant to address these broader problems and
elevate standards within the Council as well. Councilmember Ellis agreed that Councilmember
Poston has shown a willingness to do the work and said she supports following a similar process,
engaging staff to gather the necessary information, so Council can determine if this initiative is
something they can collectively support.
MAYOR HARTKE said thanked councilmembers for the discussion and the documents provided.
He noted that he started the conversation and had worked with staff on the anti-bullying policy,
emphasizing his concern about Council or board members acting inappropriately toward staff. He
said he does not sense a consensus tonight and suggested the Council reconvene on Thursday to
give direction. Mayor Hartke stressed that before moving forward with an ethics committee, the
Council needs to clarify the scope, whether it involves a charter change like in Tempe or Mesa, or
codifying rules such as limits on gifts. He encouraged narrowing the focus and gathering input
from other councilmembers before Thursday so the discussion can be more deliberate, but noted
it is not any one councilmember’s job to decide alone.
COUNCILMEMBER POSTON thanked everyone for the discussion and said the diversity of opinions
reinforced why she brought the issue to Council. She emphasized that she believes this is a Council
decision and wanted to ensure that, if the Council does not direct staff, there is at least comfort
with her leading the effort individually. Councilmember Poston explained that she did not feel
comfortable using her four hours to direct staff alone on a matter affecting the entire Council, and
she still believes the best approach is for the Council as a body to provide guidance. She said she
would prepare before Thursday’s meeting to clarify next steps.
MAYOR HARTKE clarified that the decision will ultimately be made by the full Council. He explained
that what is being requested of Councilmember Poston is to use her allotted staff hours to gather
more research and develop a proposal, which she can then present to the Council for further
discussion and potential approval. He noted that this process of individual councilmember hours
for research is available to all councilmembers for various purposes.
Informational
34.
Special Event Liquor Licenses and Temporary and Permanent Extensions of Liquor License
Premises Administratively Approved
Page 20 of 20
Adjourn
The meeting was adjourned at 8:32 p.m.
ATTEST: _______________________
______________________________
City Clerk Mayor
Approval Date of Minutes: March 23, 2026
Certification
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the Study
Session of the City Council of Chandler, Arizona, held on the 23rd day of February 2026. I further
certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present.
DATED this _______ day of March, 2026.
__________________________
City Clerk