Attachment C - PHO Summary -PHO-3-20_Z-122-03-7.pdf

City of Phoenix — Formal (2020-11-18)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 25151 characters
REPORT OF PLANNING HEARING OFFICER ACTION 
Adam Stranieri, Planner III, Hearing Officer  
Julianna Pierre, Planner I, Assisting  
October 21, 2020 
ITEM NO: 6 
DISTRICT 7 
SUBJECT: 
Application #: 
PHO-3-20--Z-122-03-7 (Continued from September 16, 2020) 
Zoning:  
S-1 (Approved C-2) 
Location: 
Approximately 430 feet west of the northwest corner of 51st 
Avenue and Southern Avenue 
Acreage: 
8.95 
Request: 
1) Modification of Stipulation 1 regarding general
conformance with the site plan dated March 10, 2006.
2) Deletion of Stipulation 6 regarding landscaped fingers.
3) Deletion of Stipulation 10 regarding equestrian amenities.
4) Modification to Stipulation 13 regarding general
conformance to the elevations dated March 10, 2006 and
specific design requirements.
5) Modification of Stipulation 20 regarding presentation of
final landscape plan to Laveen Village for review.
6) Modification of Stipulation 23 regarding general
conformance to sign designs dated April 28, 2004.
7) Technical corrections to Stipulations 3, 4, 5, 11, 12, and
16.
Applicant: 
Israel J Lozoya 
Owner: 
Robert Ballard 
Representative: Mike March 
ACTIONS 
Planning Hearing Officer Recommendation:  The Planning Hearing Officer 
recommended approval with modifications and additional stipulations. 
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:  The Laveen Village 
Planning Committee heard this case on August 10, 2020 and recommended 
denial as filed and approval with modifications and additional stipulations by an 
8-0 vote. 
Attachment C

Planning Hearing Officer Summary of October 21, 2020 
Application PHO-3-20—Z-122-03-7 
Page 2 
 
 
DISCUSSION 
 
Benjamin Tate, representative with Withey Morris PLC, stated that since last 
month’s continuance, elevations, a landscape plan, and a fence plan were 
discussed with the Laveen Village Planning Committee (VPC) and finalized. 
 
Mr. Stranieri noted that there were multiple revised plans provided throughout the 
process of this case and asked for clarification about what the current plans are.  
Mr. Tate stated that he submitted a PDF of all the new plans.  Mr. Stranieri stated 
that the new plans would be date stamped with the hearing date.  He also asked 
for clarification regarding the correct site plan.  Mr. Tate confirmed that the site 
plan date stamped September 15, 2020 was the correct site plan. 
 
Robert Branscomb, Chairperson of the Laveen VPC speaking in favor of the 
request, stated that adjustments had been made since the continuance and he is 
pleased with the outcome.  He stated that he appreciated the developer taking 
the character of the community into account with their revisions. 
 
Linda Abegg, a member of the Laveen VPC speaking in favor of the request, 
stated that originally the plans lacked adequate detail, but appreciated the effort 
over the months to get the details worked out. 
 
Mr. Stranieri stated that he had no concern recommending general conformance 
to the proposed site plan.  He added that the plan is consistent with the land use 
pattern in the surrounding area and is a good transition between the proposed 
commercial to the east and the single-family residential to the west and 
northwest.  He clarified that Huntington Drive and 51st Lane have to go through a 
separate hearing process for abandonment and approval of the plan is subject to 
the abandonment.  He stated that there would be specific regard to a maximum 
of 80 units, minimum of 14% open space, driveway lengths being an average 22 
feet with minimum length of 20 feet, and provision of connectivity to the 
commercial property to the east via a pathway and gate at the northeast corner 
of the site.  He stated that the connection would be beneficial by providing direct 
access to the commercial uses to the east and a planned multi-use trail on 51st 
Avenue.  Alexander de Faria, representative with Ballard de Faria Residential, 
stated that providing the path and gate should not interfere with the site plan or 
configuration of the units. 
 
Mr. Stranieri stated that Stipulation 6, regarding landscaped fingers, and 
Stipulation 10, regarding equestrian amenities, were specific to the original 
proposal for the larger commercial center.  He stated that this is a private gated 
community which would not provide adequate lot sizes to house horses and does 
not provide direct connectivity to other equestrian amenities.  He stated that he 
had no concerns recommending deletion of Stipulations 6 and 10.

Planning Hearing Officer Summary of October 21, 2020 
Application PHO-3-20—Z-122-03-7 
Page 3 
 
 
Mr. Stranieri stated that Stipulation 13, regarding general conformance to the 
elevations dated March 10, 2006 and specific design requirements, will be 
updated to reflect the new proposed elevations with revised sub-stipulations.  Mr. 
Tate stated that he would have no issue, as long as the stipulation reflects what 
is shown in the elevations.  Mr. Stranieri stated that the sub-stipulations would 
memorialize the materials and architectural details depicted in the elevations.  
Mr. Stranieri and the representatives discussed the architectural details for the 
interior side of the units.  Mr. Tate stated that the VPC determined the elevations 
met the intent of the stipulation and asked if there could be general conformance 
without the additional sub-stipulations.  Ms. Abegg clarified that the project did 
provide the VPC’s desired variation and considering the modern design, she felt 
it meets the stipulation with different architectural elements.  Mr. Stranieri asked if 
she would be comfortable stipulating general conformance without sub-
stipulations given the revisions done over the previous months.  Ms. Abegg 
stated that the applicant originally brought renderings to the VPC meeting, but 
since they could not stipulate to renderings, additional stipulations were added to 
capture what was depicted.  However, now that the applicant has created 
elevations based on the renderings, she has no issue recommending general 
conformance without the additional sub-stipulations originally recommended by 
the VPC.  Mr. Stranieri concluded that if the representatives from the VPC had no 
concerns he would recommend general conformance to the proposed elevations 
without the additional sub-stipulations recommended by the VPC. 
 
Mr. Tate asked if the fence detail could be a sub-stipulation to Stipulation 13.  Mr. 
Stranieri stated that he was inclined to modify the stipulation to reflect general 
conformance to both buildings and fences. 
 
Mr. Stranieri stated that since the landscape plan was reviewed by the VPC, he 
would recommend modification of the stipulation to reflect general conformance 
to the proposed landscape plan.  He asked if there were any concerns regarding 
stipulating to the landscape plan without the additional sub-stipulations 
recommended by the VPC.  Ms. Abegg and Mr. Branscomb stated that the 
landscape plan originally brought to the VPC meeting lacked detail which is why 
additional stipulations were proposed.  However, the revised plan reflects what 
was requested by the additional stipulations, and there was no issue stipulating 
general conformance to the revised landscape plan. 
 
Mr. Stranieri stated that Stipulation 23, regarding general conformance to sign 
designs dated April 28, 2004, was specific to processes and designs for the 
original commercial center.  He stated that only the requirement for consistent 
materials and colors should be retained. 
 
Mr. Stranieri stated that the site is archaeologically sensitive and additional 
stipulations were warranted to address City requirements for archaeological data 
testing and surveying.

Planning Hearing Officer Summary of October 21, 2020 
Application PHO-3-20—Z-122-03-7 
Page 4 
 
 
 
Mr. Stranieri stated that the Public Transit Department requested that the bus 
pad and shelter in Stipulation 17 be retained, but this location is on the 
commercial site to the east. 
 
Mr. Stranieri stated that the Street Transportation Department provided comment 
regarding required abandonment of Huntington Drive and 51st Lane. 
 
FINDINGS 
 
1) The subject property of the request consists of 8.95 gross acres of the 
approximately 16.60 gross acres of the original rezoning case. The 
stipulated site plan depicted a large-scale commercial, retail, and office 
complex consisting of approximately 100,000 square feet of building 
footprint. The plan included a major retail tenant, smaller shops, 24,000 
square feet of offices, and four retail or drive-through restaurant pads. This 
project did not develop.  Two prior PHO actions in 2006 and 2020 have 
since modified stipulations and approved new development plans 
throughout other portions of the original case area. 
 
The proposed conceptual site plan depicts a multifamily residential 
development consisting of 80 units at a density of approximately 8.94 
dwelling units per gross acre and a maximum height of two stories and 30 
feet in height.  The design features a large open space and amenity area 
near the southeast corner of the site along Southern Avenue.  Additionally, 
private outdoor spaces are provided for all units.  Total open space is 
approximately 14%.  The site plan includes one vehicular access point on 
Southern Avenue.  There is no planned vehicular access to the single-
family residential neighborhoods to the north and west and no cross-
access to the commercial properties to the east.  The proposal also 
requires the abandonment of two planned connections to Huntington Drive 
to the west and 51st Lane to the north.  These abandonments are subject 
to approval through a separate hearing process.  Note that if the PHO 
request is approved, stipulations may require further modification based 
on the outcome of the abandonment or other required public hearings. 
 
The proposed development is compatible with land uses in the 
surrounding area and provides an appropriate transition between the 
commercially zoned property to the east and the single-family 
neighborhood to the north and west.  General conformance to the 
conceptual site plan is recommended.  Three additional sub-stipulations 
addressing density, open space, and driveway length are also 
recommended for inclusion.  These stipulations represent agreements 
reached between the applicant, community members, and members of the 
Laveen VPC.  A fourth sub-stipulation is recommended requiring the

Planning Hearing Officer Summary of October 21, 2020 
Application PHO-3-20—Z-122-03-7 
Page 5 
 
 
developer to provide a pedestrian pathway and access-controlled gate at 
the northeast corner of the site providing connectivity to the adjacent 
commercial property to the east.  The adjacent property is stipulated to a 
site plan that depicts a 5-foot pathway along the north property line 
between the shared property line and the stipulated multi-use trail along 
the west side of 51st Avenue.  This stipulation will allow access to the 
pathway, direct connectivity to the multi-use trail, and access to the 
adjacent commercial businesses.  Without this stipulation, the pathway 
does not provide its intended function and pedestrians would need to first 
exit the site onto Southern Avenue and then travel north on 51st Avenue 
to access these sites and amenities. 
 
2) Stipulations 6 and 10 are recommended for deletion as requested by the 
applicant.  Stipulation 6 regarding landscaped fingers in the parking lot 
was specific to the design of the commercial center on the original 
stipulated site plan.  Stipulation 10 regarding equestrian amenities is no 
longer relevant as the multifamily development will be a private, gated 
community and does not offer connectivity to other parcels or other 
equestrian amenities. 
 
3) The stipulated elevations depicted retail and office buildings for a large 
commercial center.  The proposed conceptual elevations depict 
multifamily residential buildings at approximately 28 feet and 10 inches in 
height with a variety of building materials including painted horizontal 
siding, stucco, and asphalt roofs.  The elevations also depict balconies, 
pop outs, pitched roof elements, varied rooflines, and decorative garage 
doors.  The elevations are compatible in character and scale with existing 
residential uses in the surrounding area.  General conformance to the 
elevations is recommended.  Other language in Stipulation 13, such as 
requirements for exposed scuppers and shaded walkways on building 
facades, is no longer relevant as it referred to the commercial 
development and may be removed. 
 
The applicant’s elevations also include fence details including split-rail 
fencing along the perimeter adjacent to Southern Avenue.  The split-rail 
fencing features intermittent posts that include stone veneers, wood 
fencing, and concrete details.  This fence is compatible with the rural and 
agricultural character of the surrounding area.  General conformance to 
these details specific fences is also recommended. 
 
4) The applicant’s landscape plan includes enhanced landscaping along the 
Southern Avenue frontage and within the open space amenity.  Trees are 
depicted in the front area of all lots and along the central drive through the 
community.  General conformance to the landscape plan is 
recommended.

Planning Hearing Officer Summary of October 21, 2020 
Application PHO-3-20—Z-122-03-7 
Page 6 
 
 
 
5) The applicant’s request for modification of Stipulation 23 regarding 
signage is recommended for approval with modifications.  As requested, 
the stipulation would create an unnecessary statement requiring signage 
to be approved by the Planning and Development Department.  
Additionally, as requested the stipulation would retain language 
referencing conceptual designs that were specific to prior proposals for the 
commercial center.  The only language necessary to retain in this 
stipulation is the requirement for signs to be compatible with materials and 
colors for buildings on site. 
 
6) The site is classified as archaeologically sensitive.  Three additional 
stipulations are recommended to address archaeological survey, data 
testing, and reporting requirements. 
 
DECISION: The Planning Hearing Officer recommended approval with 
modifications and additional stipulations. 
 
STIPULATIONS 
 
1. 
SITE PLAN 1. That tThe development shall be in general conformance 
with the site plan DATE STAMPED SEPTEMBER 15, 2020 dated March 
10, 2006, as approved or modified by the FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS, 
WITH SPECIFIC REGARD TO THE FOLLOWING, AND AS APPROVED 
OR MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND Development Services 
Department, with specific regard to TH size, location and number of pad 
buildings. 
 
 
 
 
A. 
MAXIMUM OF 80 UNITS 
 
 
 
 
B. 
MINIMUM OF 14 PERCENT OF THE GROSS PROJECT SHALL 
BE RETAINED AS OPEN SPACE 
 
 
 
 
C. 
INDIVIDUAL UNIT DRIVEWAY LENGTHS SHALL BE AN 
AVERAGE OF 22 FEET WITH A MINIMUM LENGTH OF 20 FEET 
 
 
 
 
D. 
THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE A PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY 
AND ACCESS-CONTROLLED GATE AT THE NORTHEAST 
CORNER OF THE SITE PROVIDING CONNECTIVITY TO THE 
ADJACENT COMMERCIAL PROPERTY TO THE EAST. 
 
 
 
2. 
That aAll accessory equipment, such as air, water, vacuums, and venting 
pipes shall be located no closer than fifty (50) feet to public street 
frontages and residential neighborhoods to minimize potential impacts.

Planning Hearing Officer Summary of October 21, 2020 
Application PHO-3-20—Z-122-03-7 
Page 7 
 
 
 
 
3. 
That tThe developer shall screen any drive-through queuing lanes from 
view of  51st and Southern Avenues and/or residential uses through the 
incorporation of a landscaped berm, screen wall, or combination of a 
berm and wall at least four (4) feet in height, as approved or modified by 
the PLANNING AND Development Services Department. 
 
 
4. 
That tThe developer shall provide a landscape feature incorporating turf 
and monumentation on the immediate northwest comer of the 
intersection of 51st AVENUE and Southern Avenues as approved or 
modified by the PLANNING AND Development Services Department. 
 
 
5. 
That tThe developer shall provide primary pedestrian walkways from 
Southern Avenue and the multi-use trail along 51st Avenue to the 
commercial buildings as approved or modified by the PLANNING AND 
Development Services Department.  
 
 
6. 
That tThe developer shall provide a total of four (4) landscaped fingers; 
one on each side of the two (2) driveway entrances from the shopping 
center to the Pad1/Pad 2 gasoline canopy area, that are seven (7) feet 
wide, as approved by the PLANNING AND Development Services 
Department. Each of these landscape areas shall contain one (1) tree in 
addition to other landscape materials. 
 
 
6. 
7. 
That tThe developer shall treat all primary pedestrian crossings of 
vehicular circulation drives with a change of pavement materials (color 
and texture) to demarcate the pedestrian circulation plan. 
 
 
7. 
8. 
That tThe developer shall provide a multi-use trail along the west side of 
51st Avenue in a manner that complements that multi-use trail north of 
the subject property and in accordance with adopted City of Phoenix trail 
standards, as approved by the Parks and Recreation Department. 
 
 
8. 
9. 
That aAll items for sale, excluding fuel dispensing machines and 
automatic teller machines, shall be located within buildings or screened 
from view of public streets. 
 
 
 
10. 
That the developer shall provide the following equestrian amenities on 
site, as approved by the Development Services Department: two (2) 
hitching rails, and two (2) horse troughs. 
 
 
9. 
11. 
That tThe landscaped setbacks adjacent to residential development shall 
include staggered trees planted twenty (20) feet on center with fifty 
percent (50%) of such trees being a minimum four (4) inch caliper, as

Planning Hearing Officer Summary of October 21, 2020 
Application PHO-3-20—Z-122-03-7 
Page 8 
 
 
approved or modified by the PLANNING AND Development Services 
Department.  
 
 
10. 
12. 
That aApproved plants for the site shall emphasize the agricultural 
heritage and culture of Laveen and shall include the following, as 
approved or modified by the PLANNING AND Development Services 
Department: Trees: pecan, Arizona ash, evergreen elm, heritage live 
oak, sycamore, willow acacia or similar trees. Shrubs: myrtle (true, dwarf 
or twisted), pomegranate, or similar shrubs. Accents: deer grass, wild 
sunflowers, or similar accents. Vines: white Lady Banks rose, or similar 
vines. 
 
 
BUILDING DESIGN 
 
 
11. 
13. 
Building Design 13. That the major buildings on site shall be in general 
conformance to the conceptual elevations (Exhibits 4-6) dated March 10, 
2006, including the following elements, all as approved or modified by the 
Development Services Department: 
 
Four-sided architecture, per the conceptual elevations. A variety of 
building materials, including a minimum of two (2) of the following 
materials: native stone, burnt adobe, textured brick, site made textured 
concrete, split-face block, wood (when shaded), slump block, simulated 
wood siding, exposed aggregate, corrugated metal or rusted metal 
roofing. 
 
• 
Natural and subdued color tones; 
• 
Exposed scuppers; 
• 
Pitched roof elements. 
 
A minimum ten-foot covered walkway, which can create a staggered front 
facade. Patios, trellises, and recesses may also.be used to provide 
shading and break up building mass. 
 
RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS AND PERIMETER FENCES ALONG 
SOUTHERN AVENUE SHALL BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH 
THE ELEVATIONS DATE STAMPED OCTOBER 21, 2020, AS 
MODIFIED BY THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS AND APPROVED BY 
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.   
 
 
12. 
14. 
That tThe developer shall paint all transformer and service entry 
equipment boxes to match buildings or shall screen the boxes, subject to 
utility company approval.

Planning Hearing Officer Summary of October 21, 2020 
Application PHO-3-20—Z-122-03-7 
Page 9 
 
 
13. 
15. 
That tThe gasoline station canopy shall incorporate materials and colors 
that complement the buildings on the site and the developer is strongly 
encouraged to use a pitched roof with a gable or hipped end on the 
canopy. 
 
 
Street Improvements 
 
 
14. 
16. 
That tThe developer shall construct all half-streets adjacent to the site 
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median 
islands, landscaping, and other incidentals per plans approved by the 
PLANNING AND Development Services Department. All improvements 
shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards. 
 
 
15. 
17. 
That tThe developer shall provide right-of-way for, and shall construct, a 
transit pad (P-1262) and a bus shelter (P-1261) along Southern Avenue 
west of 51st Avenue. 
 
 
16. 
18. 
That tThe developer shall apply for the abandonment of Huntington Drive 
on the west side of the site. 
 
 
17. 
19. 
That tThe developer shall complete and submit the Developer Project 
Information Form for the Maricopa Association of Governments 
Transportation Improvement Program to the Street Transportation 
Department. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency requires this 
form to meet clean air quality requirements. 
 
 
ARCHAEOLOGY 
 
 
18. 
IF DETERMINED NECESSARY BY THE PHOENIX ARCHAEOLOGY 
OFFICE, THE APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT PHASE I DATA 
TESTING AND SUBMIT AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT 
OF THE DEVELOPMENT AREA FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY 
THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRUBBING, 
LANDSCAPE SALVAGE, AND/OR GRADING APPROVAL. 
 
 
19. 
IF PHASE I DATA TESTING IS REQUIRED, AND IF, UPON REVIEW 
OF THE RESULTS FROM THE PHASE I DATA TESTING, THE CITY 
ARCHAEOLOGIST, IN CONSULTATION WITH A QUALIFIED 
ARCHAEOLOGIST, DETERMINES SUCH DATA RECOVERY 
EXCAVATIONS ARE NECESSARY, THE APPLICANT SHALL 
CONDUCT PHASE II ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA RECOVERY 
EXCAVATIONS.

Planning Hearing Officer Summary of October 21, 2020 
Application PHO-3-20—Z-122-03-7 
Page 10 
 
 
20. 
IN THE EVENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL MATERIALS ARE 
ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE DEVELOPER 
SHALL IMMEDIATELY CEASE ALL GROUND-DISTURBING 
ACTIVITIES WITHIN A 33- FOOT RADIUS OF THE DISCOVERY, 
NOTIFY THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST, AND ALLOW TIME FOR THE 
ARCHAEOLOGY OFFICE TO PROPERLY ASSESS THE MATERIALS. 
 
 
General 
 
 
21. 
20. 
That the developer present a final landscape plan to the Laveen Village 
for review. 
 
THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH 
THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DATE STAMPED OCTOBER 21, 2020 AS 
MODIFIED BY THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS AND APPROVED BY 
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. 
 
 
22. 
21. 
That lLight poles shall not exceed eighteen (18) feet in height. 
 
 
23. 
22. 
That lLight from gasoline station canopies shall not exceed thirty (30) foot 
candles measured at the ground plane. 
 
 
24. 
23. 
That signage on the property shall be in general conformance to the 
conceptual designs (three sheets) dated April 28, 2004, including the 
following elements, as approved or modified by the PLANNING AND 
Development Services Department: 
 
Ground/monument signs shall COMPLEMENT incorporate the materials 
and colors used for the major buildings on site, AS APPROVED BY THE 
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. 
 
Size and height of ground/monument signs shall not exceed those 
indicated in the above-referenced conceptual designs. 
 
In conformance to the Phoenix Sign Code, one additional ground sign is 
allowed on each street frontage to identify the user(s) of the pad building 
at the immediate corner of the intersection of 51st and Southern 
Avenues. 
 
Wall signs shall use individual, halo-illuminated letters and numbers.

Planning Hearing Officer Summary of October 21, 2020 
Application PHO-3-20—Z-122-03-7 
Page 11 
 
 
25. 
24. 
That tThe developer shall notify prospective owners/occupants that the 
subject development is in proximity to Phoenix Sky Harbor International 
Airport. The developer shall disclose the following: 
 
 
 
A. The Airport is considered a busy hub airport. 
 
 
 
 
B. Forecasts predict that Airport operations will increase. 
 
 
 
 
C. Extended flight tracks and traffic patterns may extend several miles 
beyond the Airport boundary. 
 
 
 
 
The notice shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. 
 
 
26. 
PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER 
SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS IN A 
FORM APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.  THE 
WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY 
RECORDER'S OFFICE AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE 
INCLUDED IN THE REZONING APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD. 
 
 
 
Upon request, this publication will be made available within a reasonable length 
of time through appropriate auxiliary aids or services to accommodate an 
individual with a disability. This publication may be made available through the 
following auxiliary aids or services: large print, Braille, audiotape or computer 
diskette.  Please contact the Planning and Development Department, Tamra 
Ingersoll at voice number 602-534-6648 or TTY use 7-1-1.