Attachment C - HPC Minutes - Z-175-24-6.pdf

City of Phoenix — Formal (2025-06-04)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 37986 characters
Page 1 of 17 
 
PHOENIX HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 
MONTHLY MEETING 
Final Meeting Minutes 
 
 
Date:  
March 17, 2025 
Time:  
4:30 p.m. 
Location: 
Hybrid: City Council Chambers and Virtual via Webex 
 
Commission Members Present 
Staff Present 
Dan Garcia, Chair 
Helana Ruter 
Tricia Amato, Vice Chair 
Kevin Weight 
Dan Klocke 
Maura Jackson (virtual) 
Christina Noble 
Cletus Montoya 
Brenda Thomson (virtual) 
Emma Collins 
 
Bridget Collins 
 
Danny Inglese 
 
 
 
 
Commission Members Absent 
Staff Absent 
Keely Varvel Hartsell 
Jodey Elsner 
Francesca Miller 
 
Chad Gestson  
 
 
 
 
 
1. 
Call meeting to order 
 
After technical/audio issues were resolved, Chair Garcia verified that a 
quorum was established and called the meeting to order at 4:43 p.m. 
 
Dan Garcia,  
HP Commission 
Chair 
 
2. 
Introduction of Commission Members and Staff 
 
Chair Garcia asked the Commission members to introduce themselves 
followed by staff introductions. He then moved on to the next agenda 
item. 
 
HP Commission 
and Staff 
3. 
Review of meeting minutes from the monthly meeting held on 
February 10, 2025. 
 
Action Requested: Approval of minutes. 
 
Chair Garcia asked the Commission for questions or comments about the 
draft minutes from the February 10th monthly meeting. None were posed. 
 
Chair Garcia asked the Commission for a motion on the minutes.  
 
HP Commission 
ATTACHMENT C

Page 2 of 17 
 
Vice Chair Amato made a motion to approve the minutes for the February 
10th meeting. 
 
Commissioner Klocke seconded the motion.  
 
The Commission voted as follows: 
Chair Garcia – Yes 
Vice Chair Amato – Yes 
Commissioner Klocke – Yes 
Commissioner Noble – Yes 
Commissioner Thomson – Yes 
 
Approved 5 – 0. 
 
Chair Garcia then moved on to the next agenda item.  
 
4. 
Public Hearing for Rezoning Application No. Z-175-24-6, Hansen 
Mortuary 8314 N 7th St 
 
Action Requested: Recommendation on Historic Preservation (HP) 
Overlay Zoning 
 
Chair Garcia invited Kevin Weight to present this item. 
 
Mr. Weight shared some background information on the subject property, 
as follows: 
• 
2011 – Subject property was one of 80 that were featured in 
Midcentury Marvels: Commercial Architecture of Phoenix 1945-
1975, published by City of Phoenix Historic Preservation Office; 
o Subject property was also determined eligible for listing on 
the Phoenix Historic Property Register and the National 
Register for Historic Places 
• 
2024 – Property owners expressed interest in historic designation 
on subject property 
o On behalf of property owners, Julia Taggart prepared an 
inventory form for the subject property and submitted it to 
the HP Office 
o HP staff edited/updated the inventory form and contacted 
property owner’s representative to sign an Ownership 
Authorization Form and Waiver of Claims under Proposition 
207 
o HP Commission formally initiated the HP overlay zoning 
process on October 21, 2024; followed by HP staff filing 
this rezoning application 
• 
Eligibility criteria evaluation 
o Criterion A – Historic events/trends; Hansen Mortuary is 
significant under Criterion A at the local level in the area of 
Commerce. Continuously owned and operated by the 
Kevin Weight, 
HP Staff

Page 3 of 17 
 
Hansen Family, the mortuary has been an integral part of 
the Sunnyslope community since its founding 75 years ago; 
o Criterion C – Architecture; Hansen Mortuary building is 
significant under Criterion C at the local level in the area of 
Architecture. It is an excellent example of A-frame subtype 
of Expressionist Modern architecture, commonly seen in 
high-style religious buildings from the 1960s; and 
o Integrity – Subject building was expanded a couple of times 
after its construction; North addition was built in 1976; Rear 
addition was built in 1991. Despite these alterations and 
changes to the landscaping, the building still retains 
excellent integrity of design, materials, and workmanship. It 
remains in its original location and the setting is still 
generally intact. Integrity of feeling and association are also 
sufficient to convey the building’s historic significance 
• 
Boundary justification – The proposed HP zoning boundary 
contains the documented historic resources and follows parcel 
lines and street monument lines.  
 
Mr. Weight stated that staff recommended approval of the rezoning 
request Z-175-24-6 to establish Historic Preservation (HP) overlay zoning 
for the subject property for the following reasons: 
1. The property meets the significance, age, and integrity 
requirements for HP overlay zoning set forth in Section 807.D of 
the Zoning Ordinance; and  
2. The proposed boundaries meet the eligibility criteria outlined in 
Section 807.E 
 
In conclusion, Mr. Weight shared the subsequent hearing schedule for 
this case, as follows: 
• 
April 9 – Case to be heard by North Mountain Village Planning 
Committee 
• 
May 1 – Case to be heard by Planning Commission 
• 
June 4 – Case to be heard by City Council for final decision 
 
Chair Garcia verified that the owner of the property was present and in 
favor of the item but did not wish to speak. 
 
Next, Chair Garcia verified that there were a couple of requests for public 
comment on this item. He invited Julia Taggart to share her comments. 
 
Ms. Taggart shared some background information about Hansen 
Mortuary, as follows: 
• 
1950 – Robert Lundberg and Chester Hansen established 
Lundberg-Hansen Mortuaries in Glendale and Sunnyslope areas 
in Arizona 
• 
1957 – Lundberg-Hansen partnership dissolved 
o Lundberg continued the Glendale location

Page 4 of 17 
 
o Hansen continued the Sunnyslope location (NE Corner of 
Central and Dunlap Avenues) 
• 
1962 – Hansen Mortuary Chapel was built at 8314 North 7th Street 
• 
1986 – Chester Hansen retired 
o Ownership of Hansen Mortuary was transferred to his four 
children: 
▪ 
Rae Jeanne (Hansen) Repella 
▪ 
Bradley Hansen 
▪ 
Craig Hansen 
▪ 
Patricia (Hansen) Kerr 
• 
1992 – Chapel of Prayer Mortuary (Mesa, AZ) and Mercer 
Mortuary (Midtown Phoenix) were purchased by the Hansen 
Family 
• 
1993 – DECA Cremation was established 
o  Hansen Family became sole owner in 2015 
• 
1995 – Hansen Planning Center was established 
• 
1997 – Hansen Desert Hills Mortuary and Cemetery was built at 
6500 East Bell Road (Scottsdale, AZ) 
• 
2015 – Rae Jeanne Repella and Craig Hansen retired 
o Ownership of Hansen Mortuary remained with Brad 
Hansen and Patricia Kerr 
• 
2023 – Brad Hansen retired 
o Ownership remained with Patricia ‘Trish’ Kerr 
o Brad’s son Stuart and Trish’s son Tanner are the 3rd 
generation of Hansen’s working in the family business 
• 
Current locations owned/operated by the Hansen Family include: 
o Hansen Chapel on 7th Street 
o Hansen Desert Hills Mortuary & Cemetery 
o DECA Cremation Services 
o Hansen Planning Center 
 
In conclusion, Ms. Taggart said that the Hansen family and Hansen 
Mortuary have been part of Sunnyslope and have contributed greatly to 
the community. She is grateful for everything that the Hansen family has 
continued to do for the Sunnyslope community and that they are going 
through the process to get historic designation for the Hansen Mortuary 
property. 
 
Chair Garcia thanked Ms. Taggart. Also, on behalf of the HP 
Commission, he expressed appreciation to the Hansen family for 
proactively coming forward to list their property on the city’s historic 
register. 
 
Next, Chair Garica invited Andy Sobczak to the podium for public 
comment on this item.  
 
Ms. Sobczak said she was representing the East Sunnyslope 
Neighborhood Association and Block Watch. They support this request

Page 5 of 17 
 
and want to see Sunnyslope thrive. They want to see businesses, such 
as Hansen Mortuary, that have invested in Sunnyslope remain in 
Sunnyslope. They also feel that the uniqueness of the Hansen Chapel 
building deserves recognition and designation. 
 
Chair Garcia thanked Ms. Sobczak for attending the meeting and sharing 
her comments. 
 
Chair Garcia asked the Commission for any questions or comments on 
this item. 
 
Vice Chair Amato thanked Ms. Taggart for doing research on the subject 
property. Also, she thanked the Hansen family for their willingness to 
present their property for HP zoning. She thinks the Hansen Mortuary 
property is very interesting. She also appreciates that the property and 
the family has meant so much to the Sunnyslope community. 
 
Chair Garcia asked the Commission for a motion on this item.  
 
Vice Chair Amato made a motion to recommend approval of the 
application for HP overlay zoning for Hansen Mortuary located at 8314 
North 7th Street. 
 
Commissioner Noble seconded the motion. 
 
The Commission voted as follows: 
Chair Garcia – Yes 
Vice Chair Amato – Yes 
Commissioner Klocke – Yes 
Commissioner Noble – Yes 
Commissioner Thomson – Yes 
 
Approved 5 – 0. 
 
Chair Garcia then moved on to the next agenda item. 
 
5. 
Demonstration Project Grant request – 412 W Roosevelt St 
 
Action Requested: Recommend approval of grant funding 
 
Chair Garcia invited Kevin Weight to present this item.  
 
Mr. Weight presented some background information on the subject 
property, as follows: 
• 
Built circa 1918, per the historic property inventory form and in 
response to the need for apartments in Phoenix following WWI 
o Considered as an excellent example of Prairie School 
architecture, which is rare in Phoenix 
Kevin Weight, 
HP Staff

Page 6 of 17 
 
o Continues to be used as an apartment complex 
• 
Current owner, Prairie School Apartments, LLC, acquired subject 
property in 2017 
o Property owner’s representative, Chip Halquist, has owned 
the subject property since the early 1990s 
• 
Per application, the following changes have been made to the 
property: 
o East side sun patios were enclosed with framing and 
windows prior to 1980; 
o 1994 – Interior work was done (plaster/doors/baths/kitchen) 
to make the apartments habitable; roof repairs to main 
building and garage; 
o 2015 – Garage was demolished and replaced with a 2-story 
structure with four garages at ground level and two 
apartments on the second level; and 
o 2016 – Rear stairs of main structure were reconfigured and 
replaced for access and safety 
o Subject property still retains good integrity and is classified 
as a contributor to Roosevelt Historic District, which was 
listed on the National Register of Historic Places (1983) 
and on the Phoenix Historic Property Register (1986) 
 
Mr. Weight stated that in 2019 Mr. Halquist received grant funding from 
the City of Phoenix HP Office to rehabilitate the apartment building to the 
east at 402 West Roosevelt Street. In exchange for grant funds, the city 
received a 20-year conservation easement on the property, which will 
expire in 2039. The current application submitted by Mr. Halquist requests 
funding assistance for the following items:  
− Historic window rehabilitation 
− Stucco repairs 
− Wood fascia & soffit repair 
− Door repair 
− Interior/exterior stairway repair 
− Attic and crawl space venting 
− Repainting 
 
Mr. Weight said that a total of $2,500 in eligible engineering costs is also 
included. The grand total of the eligible work items is $133,176. Although 
the application shows that the City’s share would be 50 percent of the 
cost of the eligible work, at its last meeting on February 10, 2025, the HP 
Commission revised the Demonstration Project grant program so that the 
City will now pay 100 percent, provided that the owner provides a match 
using other items. The application indicates that there will be $747,000 
worth of additional work, so the match requirement has been met. The 
city will disburse the funds on a reimbursement basis, as the eligible work 
items are completed. In exchange for the grant funds, the city will receive 
a 30-year conservation easement on the property. The easement will 
require preservation of the property and that it be insured and maintained

Page 7 of 17 
 
in good repair. He said that Mr. Halquist intends to pursue state and 
federal tax incentives to rehabilitate the property. 
 
In conclusion, Mr. Weight stated that staff recommends approval of a 
Demonstration Project grant of up to $133,176 to assist with rehabilitation 
of the historic apartment building at the subject property.  
 
Chair Garcia thanked Mr. Weight for the presentation. He then invited Mr. 
Halquist to share any additional comments.  
 
Mr. Halquist did not wish to share any comments and said that Mr. Weight 
did a fantastic job presenting the grant request. 
 
Chair Garcia thanked Mr. Halquist for attending today’s meeting. 
 
Next, Chair Garcia asked the Commission for any questions or comments 
on this item. None were posed. He then asked the Commission for a 
motion on this item.  
 
Commissioner Noble made a motion to recommend approval of grant 
funding for the property at 412 West Roosevelt Street. 
 
Commissioner Klocke seconded the motion. 
 
The Commission voted as follows: 
Chair Garcia – Yes 
Vice Chair Amato – Yes 
Commissioner Klocke – Yes 
Commissioner Noble – Yes 
Commissioner Thomson – Yes 
 
Approved 5 – 0. 
 
Chair Garcia then moved on to the next agenda item. 
 
6. 
Tovrea Castle updates 
 
Action Requested: Information and possible discussion 
 
Chair Garcia invited Tamera Zivic to share updates about Tovrea Castle. 
 
Ms. Zivic said she is the President of Board of Directors for the Tovrea 
Carraro Society. She said that the Tovrea Carraro Society, in partnership 
with the City of Phoenix, provides a unique experience for visitors to 
Tovrea Castle at Carraro Heights. In 2010, the City of Phoenix Parks and 
Recreation Board approved a Management & Operating Agreement with 
Tovrea Carraro Society. The Society is responsible for handling all 
aspects of the daily operations of the Castle including fundraising efforts, 
volunteer recruitment and training, scheduling and hosting public tours, 
Tamera Zivic, 
Tovrea Carraro 
Society

Page 8 of 17 
 
special event bookings, promotional efforts, and community outreach 
programs. Currently, she said that they are very excited about some of 
the projects going on now. Conversely, they are not very excited about 
other happenings, such as vandalism. They had even discussed turning 
off the lights on the buildings so as not to draw attention to the site. 
However, not having the lights turned on might even worsen the 
vandalism of the site. She attended today’s meeting to be available to 
answer the Commission’s questions. 
 
Chair Garcia said he hopes the vandalism issues at the site are being 
resolved. He also mentioned that the lights on Tovrea Castle are one of 
the highlights of the site, and he hopes that the light will remain on. He 
then asked the Commission for any questions about Tovrea Castle. 
 
Commissioner Klocke said that Tovrea Castle is such a wonderful beacon 
and a gem for the city. He said that the city has invested a lot of funding 
into the site. He also knows that the Board and volunteers have put a lot 
of work into the historic site. He then asked for clarification on the number 
of visitors that come to Tovrea Castle each year, and whether it would be 
possible to increase the number of annual visitors. He knows that it is 
very challenging for the public to get tickets to visit the site. He also 
knows that the site tours are managed by volunteers. He wondered how 
the HP Commission could support efforts to get more people to visit this 
historic site each year. He asked for some background and what the 
goals are for the site.  
 
Ms. Zivic said that after 13 years, the Board and volunteers are happy 
that people still continue to want to see the Tovrea Castle site. She stated 
that there is an average of 60,000 visitors each year, which is 
approximately 5,000 visitors each month. The site is visited by locals and 
people from around the country as well as international visitors. She 
mentioned that a ticket lottery had to be established and it is offered every 
six months so that they could better manage the six million entries for 
each lottery round. Once a person has toured the site, they must wait two 
years before they can submit another entry to the ticket lottery. In 
addition, groups that have toured the site must wait three years before 
they can submit another entry for the ticket lottery. She reviewed the 
site’s schedule of operations, as follows: 
• 
Mondays & Tuesdays – The site is closed to the public; Vendors 
and contractors are scheduled in take care of any maintenance 
needs on site 
• 
Wednesdays – Limited opening for special events/VIP tours 
• 
Thursdays – Docent-led group tours (rotating 24-48 visitors every 
hour) 
• 
Friday, Saturday & Sunday – Regular tours (rotating 12-24 visitors 
every hour) approximately 10 tours on each of these days 
• 
Provides accessibility, as needed, and maintains occupancy limits 
each day of operations

Page 9 of 17 
 
In the event that a person or group does not secure tickets through the 
lottery, the team lets them know of other interesting things to see and do 
in the area. Over the past few years, Tovrea Castle has posted a button 
on its website to purchase tickets for last minute tours, with a purchase 
limit of four tickets.  
 
Commissioner Klocke referenced the current rate of ten tours per day. He 
asked whether adding more help and more funding would it be possible to 
increase the number of visitors and number of tours per day. 
 
Ms. Zivic responded that the site is currently maxed out with occupancy 
level compliance and hours available to conduct site tours. However, they 
always welcome additional help and funding. 
 
Chair Garcia expressed his surprise at the number of visitors at the site 
each year. He asked for clarification about when a person wins lottery to 
purchase a tour ticket, what is the price per ticket. 
 
Ms. Zivic responded that the lottery winners can purchase their tickets at 
$22 per ticket. There are no discounts offered. For those who purchase 
‘last minute tour’ tickets, each ticket costs $25. 
 
Chair Garcia also asked Ms. Zivic to share about the new developments 
or improvements that are happening at Tovrea Castle. 
 
Ms. Zivic said that as of last year, Tovrea Castle is now being managed 
by the city’s Arts & Culture Department. Previously, the site was managed 
by the city’s Parks & Recreation Department. During that time, Tovrea 
Castle was given the opportunity to work with the city’s Historic 
Preservation Office along with the Parks Department and the Planning 
Commission to recreate the Caretaker’s House and Carraro Cabin on 
site. These two structures are significant to the overall property and are 
important components to the site tours.  
 
Vice Chair Amato asked for clarification on what seasons Tovrea Castle 
is open for site tours. 
 
Ms. Zivic responded that the site is closed to the public every July and 
August since these are the two hottest months of the year. It is also a 
good time for major projects and maintenance to be completed and it is 
less expensive during the summer. 
 
Vice Chair Amato mentioned that she previously had an opportunity to 
tour Tovrea Castle, not via lottery ticket, but as part of a volunteer docent 
exchange. She said that she had never been to the site before and it was 
a wonderful and rare way to get to tour the site. 
 
Ms. Zivic said that she was glad Vice Chair Amato was able to participate 
in the docent exchange. She said that it is common for Tovrea Castle to

Page 10 of 17 
 
offer docent exchange opportunities because it is an important part of the 
education piece to share about what is happening at this historic site. She 
also mentioned that the city has internships at Tovrea Castle so that the 
interns can see how the site fits in no matter in which city department they 
are based. 
 
Chair Garcia referenced the comments made by Preserve Phoenix 
regarding the Tovrea Castle site. He said that Preserve Phoenix was 
inquiring about specific timelines from some of the ongoing restoration 
work at the site. He asked whether Ms. Zivic would reach out to Preserve 
Phoenix to share available updates with them.  
 
Commissioner Klocke asked for more clarification whether all 60,000 
annual visitors get to tour inside the castle or just on the grounds. 
 
Ms. Zivic confirmed that every visitor gets to tour inside the castle. 
 
Chair Garcia said that the Tovrea Castle organization is well organized 
and well managed. He wondered whether Ms. Zivic would be open to 
reaching out to Julia Taggart to discuss options for setting up a similar 
organization to manage another of the city’s remaining castles. 
 
Ms. Zivic responded that the Tovrea team is in regular talks with Ms. 
Taggart. 
 
Commissioner Thomson expressed her surprise with the high volume of 
visitors, around 1,500 per week, to tour the Tovrea Castle property. She 
said that it seems amazing to be able to coordinate that many people 
each season.  
 
Ms. Zivic said that they are very organized but the tour trams take a 
beating every year.  
 
Chair Garcia expressed thanks on behalf of the Commission for the 
presentation. He then moved on to the next agenda item.  
 
7. 
PreserveHistoricPhoenix2025 Draft Plan 
 
Action Requested: Information and possible discussion 
 
Chair Garcia invited Helana Ruter to present this item. 
 
Ms. Ruter reiterated that she had sent the Commission members a link to 
the shared file of the graphically designed version of the updated draft 
plan. She encouraged Commission members to review the report and 
send their respective comments, questions, and suggestions to her. She 
mentioned that this updated version of the draft plan, which also includes 
the PlaceEconomics original study and recommendations, will be posted 
online in April for public review and feedback. Then the draft will come 
Helana Ruter, 
HP Staff

Page 11 of 17 
 
back to the HP Commission for the full recommendation and ultimately 
presented to City Council in the Fall for ratification. 
 
Chair Garcia said that he really liked the logo and images in the draft 
report and said that it was a very easy and engaging read. He 
encouraged Commission members to read through the report if they have 
not yet done so. He mentioned that he would share his few comments 
offline with Ms. Ruter. He then asked the Commission for any questions 
or comments on the updated draft report.  
 
Commissioner Thomson asked for clarification about which villages have 
been selected as audiences for the public presentations of the revised 
draft plan. 
 
Ms. Ruter said that the revised draft plan would be presented, as 
information only, at all the villages at their respective planning meetings, 
followed by the Planning Commission. Then the revised draft plan would 
go back to each of the Village Committees for formal recommendations, 
and then it would come before the HP Commission for its formal 
recommendation. She is hopeful that there will be some good 
engagement by the public at these upcoming presentations. 
 
Chair Garcia referenced letters received from Preserve Phoenix, which is 
advocating stronger protection measures in historic districts. He asked 
Ms. Ruter for clarification on those comments.  
 
Ms. Ruter said that she had sent a follow up email to Preserve Phoenix to 
get some clarification on the letter. She mentioned that the HP Office has 
larger plan goals or action items to change the Ordinance to allow for 
greater protection for designated properties. She said that the updated 
draft plan represents the basic protection goals. In addition, she said that 
a lot of public engagement and discussions would be required to 
determine which elements to focus on to meet those goals.  
 
Next, Chair Garcia moved on to the next agenda item. 
 
8. 
Update on requests for demolition 
 
• 
30-day demolition holds 
• 
Properties on the Phoenix Register 
 
Action Requested: Information and possible discussion 
 
Chair Garcia invited Cletus Montoya to present the update. 
 
Mr. Montoya referenced the 30-day hold report that was provided to the 
HP Commission and briefly reviewed the DAPPs that were submitted 
since the last meeting, as follows: 
 
Cletus Montoya, 
HP Staff

Page 12 of 17 
 
DAPPs:  
There have been no new applications since the last report. However, 
there are several applications that are still open, which include: 
o (4) CPLC properties on Central Avenue 
▪ 
2 eligible and 2 not eligible 
o (1) UMOM property at 3832 Grand Avenue - eligible 
 
Demolition requests approved for listed properties: 
There have been no approvals since the last report. 
 
HPDEs permits denied:  
There have been no new applications denied since last month’s report. 
 
Chair Garcia referenced the properties owned by CPLC and UMOM and 
asked for clarification as to whether federal funds would be used for any 
of these demolitions. He also asked whether there would be a separate 
historic preservation process outside of this HP Commission; if so, it is 
important for the Commission to be involved in that process before 
forwarding on to the State Historic Preservation Office. 
 
Ms. Ruter said that the owners of the Grand Avenue property are 
consulting with the State HP Office as they anticipate applying for federal 
funding for the low income housing project there. She mentioned that she 
had informed the property owners that they would need to verify 
compliance.  
 
Chair Garcia asked the Commission for any questions or comments from 
the Commission. No questions were posed. He then moved on to the next 
agenda item.  
 
9. 
Advocacy and outreach update 
 
Chair Garcia asked the Commission for any advocacy and outreach 
updates.  
 
Commissioner Thomson asked Ms. Ruter to share information about the 
scheduled tours at the upcoming HP Conference in Phoenix. 
 
Ms. Ruter had reached out to Commissioner Thomson, who is also the 
Executive Director of Arizona Humanities Council, which is housed in the 
historic Ellis-Shackelford House. They coordinated some opportunities for 
HP Conference participants to tour inside this historic property, which will 
also be the starting point for tours through the Roosevelt Historic District 
as well as a tour of the Masonic Temple in downtown Phoenix. She 
mentioned that conference participants can register online for the tours. 
 
Next, Chair Garcia moved on to the next agenda item. 
 
HP Commission

Page 13 of 17 
 
10. 
Staff updates and requests for information from staff 
• 
Chambers Transfer & Storage (OIC Building) – 39 E Jackson St 
• 
Palo Verde Library – 4380 N 51st Ave 
 
Ms. Ruter referenced a public comment made at last month’s meeting 
that asked for a status update on the Chambers Transfer & Storage (OIC 
Building). She stated that the OIC Building had gone through the zoning 
process in 2020. There were actually three companion cases that 
happened for this property, in which there was a proposal to remove the 
HP overlay. She also mentioned that there was an existing conservation 
easement in place as the property had received grant funds. Additionally, 
based on the area in the Downtown Code, there was a specific height 
maximum that was allowable on the property. She said that the applicant 
was looking to remove the HP overlay, extinguish the easement, and 
increase the height so that they could create a multistory, mixed-use 
property on top of the OIC Building. None of it was recommended by staff 
for approval, but ultimately the overlay was removed as part of the City 
Council’s decision. The funds have been repaid for the easement. 
However, there are stipulations that still need to be addressed to release 
the existing easement. Also, there are stipulations in the zoning case, 
which require an approved building permit in advance of being able to 
receive a demolition permit. She had reviewed the system files for this 
case and found that there was a pre-application meeting held in May 
2023 and then nothing progressed from there. She also understood that 
the property had been foreclosed. Regarding the prior zoning case, there 
are few outstanding items that will need to be taken care of in order to 
move forward. She had reached out to Christine Mackay, Director of 
Community Economic Development Department, for available contact 
information for the property owner since they have not yet contacted the 
HP Office. 
 
Chair Garcia asked for clarification on the situation where the funds have 
been repaid for the easement but the easement has not yet been 
removed.  
 
Mr. Inglese responded that it is an odd situation but it is certainly possible. 
However, he said that the city would have a difficult time enforcing the 
conservation easement, if the benefit that the city received in exchange 
for that easement had been returned to the city. He said that even if all 
the paperwork was not finalized, he thinks it would not be wise for the HP 
Commission or for the city to treat that conservation easement as a going 
concern, even though it may be reflected on paper. 
 
Chair Garcia thanked Mr. Inglese for clarifying.  
 
Mr. Weight agreed with Mr. Inglese’s comments but added that the HP 
Office was in no rush to remove the easement or to place the easement 
on just the three remaining walls. He said that the ball was left in the 
property owner’s court to repay the easement funds and drop off the 
HP Commission 
and Staff

Page 14 of 17 
 
documents that would need to be executed by the city. He said that the 
owner has not yet done so.  
 
Commissioner Klocke asked for clarification on the status of the subject 
building, whether it was still with the lender or has it been transferred to a 
new ownership. 
 
Ms. Ruter said that she was not certain, but recent newspaper articles 
had suggested that the property was foreclosed upon and that the lender 
was holding the property.  
 
Mr. Inglese said that the situation is a bit murky and he could not state 
with certainty, but his recollection was that the subject property was sold 
at a trustee sale and that it is currently held by a private owner.  
 
Chair Garcia asked staff for an update on the Palo Verde Library. 
 
Ms. Ruter said that the Palo Verde Library property had gone through and 
completed the 30-day hold process on the demolition application for the 
newer portion of the library. The Parks Department has a broader vision 
to develop additional recreational amenities versus continuing to keep the 
building. She understood that the local constituency was excited about 
having additional recreational opportunities on site. The Parks 
Department has long-term plans for the site and are set up to engage with 
the community to redesign the western portion of the Maryvale Park and 
integrate additional park amenities and features that will benefit the local 
area residents. The demolition permit has been pulled and the demolition 
is expected in the not too distant future.  
 
Chair Garcia asked for clarification on the permitted entity, whether it was 
the city or a contractor. 
 
Ms. Ruter said that the city owns the property but it does not have a 
license for demolition, so instead, it uses an on-call licensed contractor.  
 
Next, Chair Garcia invited Ms. Ruter to share an additional staff update.  
 
Ms. Ruter mentioned that HP staff member Desiree Aranda had the 
opportunity to accept a new position as the HP Officer for the City of 
Tucson. It is bittersweet for our office but we are excited for Desiree and 
she will be amazing in her new role. Our office will be working on opening 
up a recruitment to fill the vacant position.  
 
Chair Garcia verified that there were no requests for public comments on 
this item. He then moved on to the next item. 
 
11. 
Future agenda items 
• 
HB2721 Missing Middle Housing 
 
HP Commission 
and Staff

Page 15 of 17 
 
Chair Garcia asked staff for any comments. 
 
Ms. Ruter said that this item would be presented at a future meeting. In 
the interim, staff continue to work with the Law Department to review the 
proposed House Bill (HB2721) that addresses middle housing within a 
mile radius of downtown, which would allow up to fourplexes on single-
family properties and determine its impact on the historic preservation 
review process. She reminded the Commission that the separate ADU Bill 
was passed and it allows up to three units on single family properties.  
 
Mr. Inglese reiterated that the law has passed, and the city has until the 
end of the year to adopt a text amendment for the ADU Bill. 
 
Chair Garcia verified that there were several requests for public 
comments on this item. He invited the following attendees to the podium 
for comments: 
 
Bradley Brauer – Mr. Brauer was representing the Willo Neighborhood 
Association. Last summer, they reached out to their Representative and 
Senator to discuss HB2721 and how this might impact all the historic 
districts located within and outside the mile radius of downtown. He 
mentioned that their Representative did write up HB2719 to 
amend/supersede HB2721 to exempt historic districts. Unfortunately, the 
proposed bill was not brought forward for a vote. Now, their goal is to 
collect enough signatures to make the State Legislature realize the 
importance of protecting our history and our historic districts. He urged 
the HP Commission to share with their respective connections in the 
various cities in the valley and around the state. 
 
Chair Garcia thanked Mr. Brauer. He also mentioned that this year’s 
Historic Preservation Conference will be held in Phoenix, which would be 
a good opportunity for Mr. Brauer to attend and connect with a wide 
audience of historic preservation advocates and gain some additional 
support. 
 
Tom Doescher – Mr. Doescher has been residing in Willo for 23 years. 
He lives across from a vacant lot, which is just outside the Willo Historic 
District. He is concerned about potential infill projects and the possibility 
of neighboring properties being sold to developers who would demolish 
them and build something else. He urged the HP Commission to discuss 
HB2721 to determine a response to the State regarding an exemption for 
historic districts.  
 
Opal Wagner – Ms. Wagner resides in the Willo neighborhood. She is 
serving on the Save Historic Willo Committee, which Brad Brauer created. 
She also serves on the Encanto Village Planning Committee. She 
clarified that HB2721 was passed into law on May 21, 2024, and it is now 
known as A.R.S. 9-462.13. This law states that on any single-family 
owned lot, within a one-mile radius of a municipality’s central business

Page 16 of 17 
 
district, that up to fourplexes is a permitted use. She understands this to 
mean there will be no hearings regarding the development of duplexes, 
triplexes, fourplexes, and townhouses. She wondered whether a single-
family property could be divided into four lots, redeveloped into four little 
houses with a minimum of two stories each, and then sold off as four. She 
wondered what this would mean for historic preservation districts. She 
said that there have been many investments made in the Willo 
neighborhood through rehabilitation grants. She is concerned about the 
potential of developers buying properties and tearing them down for 
redevelopment, which could begin dismantling existing historic districts 
that have been preserved for decades. She mentioned that 22 of the 
existing 36 Phoenix historic districts are located within a one-mile radius 
of the city’s central business district and are at risk for demolition and 
redevelopment. She said that this law is the biggest to impact properties 
since so many properties were torn down to build Interstate 10. She 
urged the HP Commission to bring this item forward for further discussion 
as well as public information and education to prevent further demolition 
and redevelopment in the city’s historic districts. 
 
Chair Garcia thanked Ms. Wagner. He reiterated that Ms. Ruter stated 
that there will be presentations on this issue at upcoming meetings. He 
encouraged Ms. Wagner and others to attend and participate at those 
meetings.  
 
Chair Garcia verified there were no further requests for public comment 
on this item. He then moved on to the next agenda item. 
 
12. 
Public Comment and Communication 
 
Chair Garcia verified that there was one request for public comment. He 
invited Julia Taggart to the podium. 
 
Ms. Taggart referenced the flyer she provided to the HP Commission. 
She said that there will be an agenda item at next Wednesday’s City 
Council meeting to request approval for a “Wallace & Ladmo Way” sign to 
be displayed near First Studio Gallery (formerly KPHO Studio) as a way 
to remember the Wallace and Ladmo show being a part of the city’s 
history. She also mentioned that “Slope Fest” is scheduled for April 5th in 
Sunnyslope, and she invited everyone to come be a part of this event. In 
addition, she thanked Mr. Weight for his wonderful presentation on the 
Hansen Mortuary request for designation. She also thanked Ms. Ruter for 
sharing the revised draft PreserveHistoricPHX plan and said it was 
beautifully done. 
 
Chair Garcia verified that there were no further public comments. He then 
moved on to the next agenda item.  
 
 
Public

Page 17 of 17 
 
13. 
 
Adjournment 
 
Chair Garcia adjourned the meeting at 6:28 p.m. 
 
HP Commission 
For further information, please call the Historic Preservation Office at 602-261-8699. 
 
For reasonable accommodation, call Elaine Noble at Voice 602-495-0256 or the City TTY Relay (602) 534-5500 as 
early as possible to coordinate the necessary arrangements. 
 
Si necesita asistencia o traducción en español, favor de llamar lo más pronto posible a la Oficina de Preservación 
Histórica de la ciudad de Phoenix al 602-261-8699.