Attachment A - Mr. Kim Baker Citizen Petition 05212025.pdf
Extracted text (via ocr_local)
9719 characters
Attachment A “2 Korn Pavan oS|2\ es OFFICE OF THE ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL KRIS MAYES ATTORNEY GENERAL OPEN MEETING LAW ENFORCEMENT TEAM April 16, 2025 Zz < VIA EMAIL =. =o Kimmie Baker = 3 bkim4749@gmail.com ae ; ra) Re: — Open Meeting Law and the Phoenix City Council Investigation No. OML2022-0071 Dear Kimmie Baker: We write to provide you with an update regarding the open meeting law complaint you submitted to this Office on or around November 14, 2022. Due to the volume of open meeting law complaint submissions we receive, the Office must exercise its prosecutorial discretion in processing and resolving such complaints. Given the significant passage of time since the complaints’ original submission, this investigation has been administratively closed. If you believe that the open meeting law violations described in your original complaint(s) are ongoing, please resubmit your complaint with updated information about the continuing violations via the online portal at www.azag.gov/omlet. for your interest in open meetings. If you have questions, you may contact the Open Meeting Law Enforcement Team at OMLETinfo@azag. gov or 602-542-8064. We appreciate you contacting our Office and thank you Sincerely, The Open Meeting Law Enforcement Team OMLETinfo@azag.gov 2005 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85004-1592 © (602) 542-3333 ° www.azag.gov Office of Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich Open, Meeting Law Complaint Form How We Investigate Complaints The Attorney General's Office (the “Office”) is authorized by statute to investigate and resolve allegations that public bodies have violated the Open Meeting Law. The statute requires that complaints submitted to the Office be in writing and signed. We do not act on anonymous complaints. Complaints and supporting materials are public records and may be disclosed as required by law. Upon receipt of the complaint, the case is assigned to a member of the Open Meeting Law Enforcement Team (“OMLET’). The OMLET member will review the complaint and may contact the public body and other witnesses for a response to your allegations and any other relevant evidence. if necessary, the OMLET member will contact you to obtain further information. In order to expedite the process, please consolidate your complaints as much as possible, How We Resolve Complaints After gathering the relevant evidence, the OMLET member will work with the public body to reach a resolution of the case. The Office’s primary mission in enforcing the Open Meeting Law is to ensure compliance and educate the public and public officials about the requirements of the statute. Most cases are resolved with mandatory training and a term of monitoring in which an independent attorney ensures that the public body is complying with the Open Meeting Law. In serious cases, the OMLET member may seek a civil penalty of $500 per incident. If the public body refuses to reach an agreed resolution, the OMLET member may file suit in superior court seeking that the appropriate remedies be imposed by court order. If the evidence establishes that a public officer violated the Open Meeting Law with the intent to deprive the public of information, the OMLET member may seek to have the officer removed from office. How You Can Help Us To expedite an investigation as much as possible, please provide as much specific information as you can about the alleged violations, such as the dates and times of events, the people present, and the content of any conversations; this should include the name and contact information for other witnesses who are willing to provide evidence about the alleged violations. Also, please include any documents, photograps, videos, or other evidence that support your allegations. . Pe oye If you are one of a group of people interested in filing a complaint against a public body, please’seléc' one person to file a complaint and attach written statements from the remaining complainants. 2005 N Central Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85004 Office of Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich Open Meeting Law Complaint Form Continued Name of public entity that is the subject of this complaint: ‘a BY ‘ re ty Counet| City oF eni¥ Please describe the conduct that you believe violated the Open Meeting Law. If more space is needed, please attach additional information on a separate sheet, On Octolec iz, zoz7z., Them No, 45, Deputy C iby Movie yer Mae ei OPeces, Wo options of Qatious A, bak B, Eom Ye Qecson uho Oceseuted Mne Cikizens Pedivion in Qwes tron, T went to We. meeting &xeecking one oc the ater O¢tion to bbe teen TC fgoke St¢poct of Mie. Petition, the. Perivion Cecieled a nstion to Proceed, avid OL Seoonl $0 Gucter QekKon A The. Mavor only ook, a Col\ Count: of tee Counts \ Members of We wine ‘Wot were. a odlendonce, ‘i & dtkem? to Silence the ynatter, Te Mayor cat on dectwe. \oy the Ciby Manager OS te Whak las Yo ndgpen ond. Tease TO faliow kX, # List the date(s) on which you believe the Violation(s) occurred. Cctohec IZ, aau¢.. Hoema | Counce’ | Meeting Please identify all members of the public body whom you believe violated the requirements of the Open Meeting Law. The Mayor, Xne Council aud the Ciby Wangge (> “Whey aide Wank te caceed uty Ane = Depactwnente, cwpbroval of 6 Grol Citizens Petition See (2) atoched 2005 N Central Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85004 Office of Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich Open Meeting Law Complaint Form Continued — eS 57 e918, & If possible, please provide the agenda for any meeting at which you believe a violation occurred. If there are other documents that you believe may assist in our investigation of your complaint, please provide them with this complaint. Your Information Names Kaw 2. Rak er Address: ee E ‘Tisai An ick ak Zlob City: Poaenig State: A ra y wall | SSo72— Phone: (23- Clq- 2b Email: Kim u7d + Gawail Conan I declare under penalty of perjury, that the facts and statements contained in this declaration, including any attached statements, are true, correct, and based upon my personal Knowledge. I understand that the information contained in this declaration can only be altered by submitting a new declaration. Signature: Ki. & i Date: })-Jo- 27 To submit a complaint about a violation of the Open Meeting Law, please compete this form, sign it, and mail it to: Arizona Attorney General's Office Attention: Open Meeting Law Enforcement Team/CLD 2005 N Central Avenue Phoenix, AZ 85004 Alternatively, please visit www.azag.gov/complaints/omlet to submit a complaint online. 2005 N Central Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85004 City Council Formal Meeting e City of Phoenix Report Agenda Date: 10/12/2022, Item No. 95 Consideration of Citizen Petition Related to the Phoenix Police Department This report provides the City Council with information in response to a citizen petition submitted by Kim Baker at the Sept. 21, 2022 Formal City Council meeting regarding the Phoenix Police Department (Attachment A). Summary The petitioner requests the City Council to direct the City Manager's Office to investigate the full dereliction of duty by the Phoenix Police Department concerning "Complaint Report #20210001645266, Bias Hate Crime." A similar request was submitted by Kim Baker at the Aug. 31, 2022 Formal City Council Meeting (Attachment B). The Law Department determined that the request was not.a qualified citizen petition. Mr. Baker returned and submitted another citizen petition on Sept. 21, 2022 and the Law Department determined that it was a qualified citizen petition. A staff response dated Sept. 20, 2022 was included in the Sept. 22, 2022 General Information Packet (Attachment C) and emailed to Mr. Baker on Sept. 23, 2022, in response to his Aug. 31, 2022 request. Options for Council Action A. Direct the City Manager's Office to research this request consistent with the citizen petition dated Sept. 21, 2022. B. Take no further action on the petition. Responsible Department This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer: Page 662 CITY CLERK BEPT, rp 9 a Attachment A Oe SEP 21 PH 5 21 CITIZEN'S PETITION September 21, 2022 1, Kinin Dwayne Baker, hereby petition the Mayor and Council to direct the City Manager's Office to investigate tho full dereliction of duty by the Phoenix Police Department concerning “Complaint Report 2021000164526, Bias Hate Crime ” (1) Why did t have to wait for about two hours for officers to respond and they never showed up on October 21, 2021? (2) Why 45 this police department allowing a lead person, David Cacson, Private Investigator, to obstruct justice per ARS 13 2409 when his text message to me met all Criteria of Obstruction? (3) Amt bemg permitted full protection of the faw per A RS. 13 2409, if they want to fully Investigate all suspects and leads Please see attachments A, B,C, and 0. Respectially Submitted, Kammie Owayne Baker 15506 Thonderbird Rd #2106, Phoenix, AZ 8502? Page 663 A dden dom +o Cid LEW Fern May i) 225 Yne Meyer ow wh tmwmje Day ker Nee VO") L Kivenie Boke heey of duty PY Cinmne’l XO investigate he RA desee er wt feport ar the Phoenx Yelice Yepactment Compa gorieeo W45re& Bias Hate Crime. A Did Reticed Chie? Sullvan, leave oRice Wd Te submitted Or Should have Kean Yat the Attorney Ag. Me Complaint on or About Apc: \ Ib, 222s. 3. Why \% the polize AePocbment allowing, cx lend person, Dor Coolgov, Prvede, Tnvestigate Yo cbstruct Tastee Pec ARS |3- 2404, hen ca oF posiruatien, 4, Bun T lens Pecmnittea, AQ\ protection oF tne lad Per ARS [3 2494 E Mic Weak of AeAiny Povec Criice Wi Hol \nves tigate ol Sus perk oni \ecods. We text messege, tome wel All Core Kespectiicly Sadows Nek fm Phew