Attachment B - VPC Summary - Z-36-A-19-6.pdf

City of Phoenix — Planning Commission (2020-11-05)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 16455 characters
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-36-A-19-6 
Date of VPC Meeting 
October 6, 2020 
Request From 
PUD (17.72 acres) 
Request To 
PUD (17.72 acres) with an amended development 
narrative 
Proposed Use 
Major Amendment to allow multifamily residential in 
LUA E and updates to associated development 
standards, and add a supplement to the design 
guidelines for LUA H 
Location 
Northwest corner of 44th Street and Camelback Road 
VPC recommendation 
Approval, per staff recommendation  
Vote 
18-0 
VPC DISCUSSION: 
Ms. Sofia Mastikhina, staff, provided an overview of the request, including the 
location, surrounding zoning, and General Plan Land Use Map designation of the 
site. The site falls within the Camelback East Employment Corridor, and the 
addition of residential options in the area will help support employees along this 
corridor. She pointed out that the addition of residential uses does not replace 
other permitted uses such as office space. The proposed amendment seeks to 
add 70 multifamily residential units within Land Use Area (LUA) E, which is 
centrally located on the site. The amendment includes a provision that prohibits 
these units from being rented for less than 6 months at a time. However, this 
regulation cannot be enforced by the city. The previously approved PUD 
permitted 20 residential units as part of the hotel use. Proposed amenity areas 
for the new multifamily residential will be provided in both LUAs D and E and 
shall be between 10,000 and 25,000 square feet in size. The maximum building 
height shall remain the same, with the added restriction that rooftop use shall be 
prohibited and an additional 4 feet in height will be allowed for mechanical 
equipment. She then presented the proposed “Building H Character 
Perspective/Rendering,” which depicts a conceptual rendering of the building that 
will be located closest to the corner of 44th Street and Camelback. The PUD 
amendment will require general conformance to this rendering for this particular 
building, with special attention to the incorporation of minimum 2 feet of 
horizontal and/or vertical architectural articulation and the use of a mix of building 
materials such as glass, metal, and stone. Ms. Mastikhina presented staff’s 
findings, recommendation for approval, and recommended stipulations of 
approval. 
Attachment B

Camelback East Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
October 6, 2020 
Page 2 of 6 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Mr. Ed Bull, representative with Burch & Crachiollo, presented an aerial view of 
the site, noting that it is not current as the Suns/Mercury facility is well underway 
on the northern portion of the property. He explained that the primary focus of the 
amendment is in the middle of the PUD area, in Sub-Zone 3, and some added 
design guidelines in Sub-Zone 4, on the southern portion of the site. He 
presented the new proposed Land Use Area map, noting that LUA E will become 
larger by approximately a quarter of an acre, which LUA D will become smaller 
by approximately the same area. The addition of residential does not eliminate 
the possibility of office over retail and will instead provide the opportunity for 
partial ground-floor retail with multifamily above. LUA D will still be primarily a 
parking garage and will also provide amenities to the multifamily use. He then 
presented the previous diagram of the retail and office building in LUA E with the 
adjoining parking garage, and the new proposed diagram of the partial ground 
floor retail, multifamily above, and the parking garage that will be substantially 
underground. He noted that the residential amenity area will not be visible to 
adjacent neighborhoods and the multifamily residential building will wrap around 
this area to conceal it from view. He then presented a conceptual rendering of 
what the multifamily residential development could look like, noting the high-
quality architectural design. Regarding traffic generation on the site, the transition 
from solely office and retail space in LUA E to multifamily residential uses will 
significantly reduce trips to and from the site. The most recent traffic study shows 
that it will cut trips in half daily. Mr. Bull then outlined the changes made to the 
proposed amendment based on feedback received from various community 
members. These changes include the removal of proposed rooftop villas and the 
associated additional building height, the prohibition against rooftop use by 
residents, a restriction on short-term rentals, and additional standards for rooftop 
mechanical equipment. He presented a rendering of the proposed building on the 
immediate northwest corner of 44th Street and Camelback Road, noting that 
there are no changes to the development standards for this building, and that the 
development on this portion of the site will be in general conformance to this 
rendering. He shared a letter of support for the amendment that was written by a 
key neighborhood spokesperson. Mr. Bull then addressed emails that were sent 
to staff regarding traffic and construction parking adjacent to the project, stating 
that Red Development would like to be proactive about addressing these 
concerns. He noted that this amendment will not increase traffic and will, in fact, 
decrease it, as explained earlier. Further, he explained that the development will 
have absolutely no pedestrian or vehicular access to the adjacent neighborhood. 
However, as the streets in the neighborhood are public, there is only so much 
that the developer can do to enforce this, so he shared the name of the city’s 
Street Transportation Department staff that handles traffic mitigation issues. He 
also stated that the developer will have personnel on site both during and after 
construction to ensure that parking remains entirely onsite and does not spill over 
into the neighborhood. Red Development will also meet with all contractors and 
subcontractors before breaking ground to reinforce that parking absolutely 
cannot occur off-site. After construction is completed, all parking will be provided 
on site on both surface parking and parking garages. Concerns regarding parking

Camelback East Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
October 6, 2020 
Page 3 of 6 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
for customers of Steak 44 and other existing businesses were also expressed, 
and he stated that, although Red Development is not responsible for providing 
adequate parking for those businesses, they will be forming a working group with 
those business owners, themselves, and city staff, to ensure that adequate 
parking is provided and that parking does not negatively affect the adjacent 
neighborhoods. He concluded the presentation by asking that the Committee 
approve this request per staff’s recommendation. 
 
Chairman Jay Swart stated that, when these letters of concern were received, 
Mr. Ed Bull and the Red Development team were prompt to set up a conference 
call to discuss the matter and how to address these issues. He added that the 
matter of pedestrian intrusion was not addressed and suggested that a sign be 
posted to indicate that access to the neighborhood is prohibited. He also 
suggested that this be included in the letter that the developer sends out to the 
community, and that a contact phone number be included that residents can call 
should these issues arise so that it can be immediately resolved. Mr. Bull agreed 
with Chairman Swart’s suggestions and indicated that they will follow through 
with them to ensure that any impacts on the neighborhood from the project are 
prevented or swiftly resolved. 
 
Mr. Barry Paceley commended Mr. Ed Bull and the Red Development team for 
their proactive approach with this amendment. He added that a project of this 
size will likely require a security team and suggested that the traffic and parking 
issues be shared with them so they can help enforce the rules. 
 
Ms. Christina Eichelkraut noted that there were additional concerns outlined in 
the emails received, such as back yard privacy concerns and the potential glare 
from glass windows and asked if the developer has addressed these. Mr. Bull 
stated that the northern perimeter of LUA E is approximately 200 feet from the 
nearest residential neighborhood, and that there are several layers of 
landscaping between the development and the adjacent neighborhoods, as well 
as alleyways. He also stated that the city has provisions for maximum reflectivity 
on buildings that will address any potential glare from the building. Ms. 
Eichelkraut thanked for the response and praised the development team for 
their extensive community outreach throughout this process. 
 
Ms. Linda Bair asked if the residential units will be for rent of if they will be 
privately owned. Mr. Bull responded that this decision has not yet been made. 
Ms. Bair expounded on her question, stating that I they were privately owned, 
the restriction on short term rentals could be enforced via CCRs, and asked how 
they will enforce this otherwise. Mr. Bull stated that Red Development has 
committed to adding this via private restrictions throughout this mixed-use 
development. 
 
Mr. Ryan Trauscht echoed Mr. Paceley’s and Ms. Eichelkraut comments and 
praised the developer for their proactive approach to the community outreach. He

Camelback East Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
October 6, 2020 
Page 4 of 6 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
then asked what the stipulation regarding 55 feet of right of way refers to – will 
this be for vehicles or pedestrians. Ms. Mastikhina explained that the right-of-
way refers to the portion of the road that will be dedicated to the city to be 
publicly owned and maintained after construction has ended. This includes both 
the vehicular travel lanes and the sidewalks. Mr. Trauscht expressed his 
concern with pedestrians walking across 44th Street and asked if a dedicated 
pedestrian walkway will be provided along the street. Mr. Bull explained that the 
sidewalk along 44th Street will be detached, with landscaping between the 
sidewalk and the vehicular travel lanes, and added that one of the provisions of 
the originally approved PUD is that the developer work with the city to explore the 
possibility of a signalized crossing on 44th Street, north of Camelback Road. 
 
Chairman Swart stated that the president of the Arcadia Neighborhood 
Association, Tristan Schwab, sent him a message stating that their organization 
is fully supportive of this request. 
 
Public Comment 
 
Ms. Sandy Lizik thanked the developer for being so responsive to questions and 
concerns from the community. She stated that most of her concerns were 
addressed, and asked what “residential activity,” included in the applicant’s letter, 
refers to. 
 
Mr. Neal Haddad thanked the development team for reaching out and working 
with all of the various neighborhood associations to come to a speedy resolution 
of all issues raised. 
 
Mr. Bull stated that, if LUA E is developed with multifamily residential, a portion 
of LUA D will include residential amenities, which will be wrapped on three sides 
by the apartment building. These amenities include indoor and outdoor resident 
lounge space, fitness center, water element, yoga lawn, pet spa, and so on. 
There will also be additional amenities throughout the mixed-use development 
which will be available to residents. He emphasized that none of these amenities 
will be noisy or disrespectful of local neighborhoods. 
 
Motion: 
Mr. Barry Paceley made a motion to approve the request per staff’s 
recommendation. Mr. Greg Abbott seconded the motion. 
  
Vote: 18-0 
Motion passes with committee members Swart, Fiscbach, Abbott, Augusta, Bair, 
Crawford, Eichelkraut, Garcia, Grace, McKee, Miller, O’Malley, Paceley, Rush, 
Scher, Sharaby, Trauscht, and Tribken in favor.

Camelback East Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
October 6, 2020 
Page 5 of 6 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Village Planning Committee Recommended Stipulations: 
 
1. 
An updated Development Narrative for the 44 Camelback PUD reflecting the 
changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and 
Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request.  
The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the Development 
Narrative date stamped September 25, 2019, as modified by the following 
stipulations: 
 
 
 
a. Front cover: Revise the submittal date information on the bottom to add the 
following: Major Amendment City Council Adopted: November 18, 2020. 
 
 
 
b. Page 21, Footnote No. 12: Add language that explains that the City cannot 
enforce the prohibition of vacation rentals in multifamily residential 
development. 
 
 
2. 
There shall be no access to 42nd Place and 43rd Place and the developer shall 
record a 1-foot non-vehicular access easement along all parcel lines adjacent to 
single-family zoning district or local street, except for an approximately 30-foot wide 
gated vehicular access and an approximately 6-foot wide gated pedestrian access 
located approximately 40 feet north of Camelback Road that shall be allowed 
between the subject property and the Medlock Drive alignment within Arcadia Villa 
2, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
 
3. 
Development shall be responsible for the improvements and maintenance of the 
median islands on Camelback Road between 42nd Street and 44th Street.  
 
 
4. 
A sidewalk easement shall be dedicated including the full width of all sidewalks 
along Camelback Road and 44th Street, as approved by the Planning and 
Development Department.   
 
 
5. 
Right-of-way totaling 55 feet shall be dedicated for the north half of Camelback 
Road, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.   
 
 
6. 
The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development 
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, 
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and 
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility 
standards. 
 
 
7. 
In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the 
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot 
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the 
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

Camelback East Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
October 6, 2020 
Page 6 of 6 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
 
8. 
The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and construct a bus bay and bus stop 
pad along westbound Camelback Road west of 44th Street. The bus bay shall be 
constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1256 and the bus stop 
pad shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1261 with a 
minimum depth of 10 feet. The bus bay and pad shall be spaced from the 
intersection of 44th Street and Camelback Road according to City of Phoenix 
Standard Detail P1258, as modified and approved by the Public Transit, Street 
Transportation and Planning and Development departments. 
 
 
9. 
Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the developer shall submit a signal warrant 
analysis to the City of Phoenix Street Transportation Department for a location on 
44th Street approximately 600 feet north of Camelback Road, as part of the Traffic 
Impact Study. As determined by the Street Transportation Department, if the 
proposed traffic signal is permitted, all associated costs for design and construction 
will be the responsibility of the developer.