Attachment C - VPC Summary - Z-103-25-8.pdf

City of Phoenix — Formal (2025-12-03)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 16283 characters
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-103-25-8
Date of VPC Meeting 
October 20, 2025 
Request From 
S-1
Request To 
C-2
Proposal 
Commercial uses – bank and restaurant
Location 
Approximately 570 feet west of the northwest corner of 
27th Avenue and Baseline Road  
VPC Recommendation 
Approval, per staff recommendation, with a modification 
and additional stipulations 
VPC Vote  
10-0
VPC DISCUSSION:
Two members of the public registered to speak on this item. 
Staff Presentation:  
Nayeli Sanchez Luna, staff, presented an overview of Z-103-25-8. Mrs. Sanchez 
Luna discussed the location of the site, the requested zoning designation, and the 
surrounding land uses. Mrs. Sanchez Luna provided an overview of the proposed 
development including the proposed use and access throughout the site and to the 
adjacent parcel to the east. Mrs. Sanchez Luna concluded the presentation by 
summarizing the staff findings, providing the staff recommendation and proposed 
stipulations. 
Applicant Presentation: 
Mitchell Mastrin, representing the applicant with Archicon Architecture & Interiors, 
LC, began the presentation by displaying the site plan and elevations on two easels. 
Mr. Mastrin stated that the subject site was annexed into the City in 2024 and the 
request was to rezone the site to C-2 to allow for a bank and restaurant use. Mr. 
Mastrin provided the square foot dimensions of each building and noted the number of 
parking spaces. Mr. Mastrin described the site layout and the numerous drive through 
lanes. Mr. Mastrin ended his presentation by noting that they met all City 
requirements.  
Questions From the Committee: 
Carlos Ortega asked if the applicant was requesting C-1 or C-2 zoning. Mr. Mastrin 
ATTACHMENT C

Laveen Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Z-103-25-8 
October 20, 2025 
Page 2 of 6 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
noted that they were requesting C-2. Mr. Ortega asked for more information on the 
allowed uses just in case the proposed development was not built. Linda Abegg 
stated that the general conformance stipulation would require the applicant to return 
through the PHO public hearing process in the proposed development was not 
developed.  
 
Mixen Rubio-Raffin asked for more information regarding Proposition 207. Ms. 
Sanchez Luna explained that the waiver meant that the property owner waves the 
rights to make any claim for reduction in value as a result of the rezoning case.  
 
Kristi McCann asked why the restaurant was located on the west side of the site and 
the bank on the other. Mr. Mastrin stated that there was no particular reason for that 
orientation, but that this was the best design. Ms. McCann noted that she was worried 
that the bank would be developed as another drive-through restaurant, causing issues 
with other commercial development to the east in the County. Ms. McCann also voiced 
her concern regarding the location of each entry drive aisle. Mr. Mastrin stated that 
they had an approved Traffic Impact Analysis and that south of the subject site was 
the public transit station.  
 
Mr. Ortega suggested adding fencing on the center along Baseline Road to prevent 
people from crossing the street in areas outside of the pedestrian crosswalks. Mr. 
Mastrin stated that a median will be provided along Baseline Road.  
 
Public Comment:  
 
Phil Hertel asked where the speaker box was located on the site plan. Mr. Mastrin 
pointed out the location of the speaker box. Mr. Hertel stated that the speaker box 
was too close to the residential properties to the north. Mr. Hertel requested an 
additional stipulation requiring the landscape plan and the sign plan to be presented to 
the Laveen Village Planning Committee. Ms. Mastrin added that there were no sign 
plans because each property owner would have to file their own design permit.  
 
Rebecca Perrera added that she was not a major fan of the checkered design on the 
building façade. Mr. Mastrin summarized all the accent materials that were proposed 
on the elevations including wood and metal. Ms. Perrera mentioned that the 
Committee typically added language to their architecture stipulation requiring that the 
façade includes 25 percent accent material. Ms. Perrera recommended Stipulation No. 
2 be modified to reflect this language.  
 
Co-Vice Chair JoAnne Jensen asked who the tenants would be. Mr. Mastrin stated 
that the development didn’t have any tenants at the moment. Co-Vice Chair Jensen 
asked for an estimated timeline between a tenant confirmation and construction. Mr. 
Mastrin noted that it would take between four to six months for the first portion and six 
to eight months before it all is approved and ready to break ground. Co-Vice Chair 
Jensen asked if a stipulation could be added to prohibit data centers. Ms. Sanchez 
Luna explained that in order for the site to be developed into a data center, it would

Laveen Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Z-103-25-8 
October 20, 2025 
Page 3 of 6 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
have to go through the rezoning process again. Ms. Sanchez Luna added that 
stipulations prohibiting certain uses are not permitted in rezoning cases.  
 
Maria Reagin requested that the applicant give a formal presentation to the Laveen 
Citizens for Responsible Development (LCRD) because it was unclear what was 
intended on the site. Ms. Reagin voiced numerous concerns regarding the proposal. 
Mr. Mastrin stated that the intent was to rezone the property and then split the parcel 
so the restaurant and the bank have individual parcels. Mr. Mastrin noted that he met 
with the LCRD. Ms. Reagin and Mr. Hertel added that a presentation was not 
provided. Mr. Mastrin listed the individuals that he spoke to on the LCRD. Mr. Hertel 
stated that the applicant met with a subcommittee of the LCRD. Ms. Reagin stated 
that she had a lot of concerns regarding traffic safety and that she risks her life every 
time she comes to a meeting. Mr. Ortega stated that all her concerns were addressed 
in the staff recommended stipulations provided in the presentation. Mr. Ortega stated 
that staff had already stipulated enhanced buffering, landscaping, and traffic 
improvements. Ms. Reagin insisted that the applicant present to the LCRD and if he 
refused, she would contact the Planning Commission.  
 
Committee Discussion:  
 
Linda Abegg noted the general conformance stipulation and added that she liked that 
order of the restaurant and the bank because the bank would add as additional buffer 
to the daycare being built on the east County parcel. Ms. Abegg added that she would 
like to see general conformance to the elevations presented to the Committee. Ms. 
Abegg added that this would at least require any changes to the proposal to go 
through the PHO process. Mr. Mastrin added that they had not disregarded traffic and 
that there was an accepted Traffic Impact Analysis with the City. Mr. Mastrin noted 
that the elevations were provided to staff. Ms. Sanchez Luna stated that the 
elevations provided to staff were not the ones presented to the Committee. Ms. 
Sanchez Luna noted that if the Committee decided to stipulate general conformance 
to the elevations, then they would add today’s date.  
 
Motion: 
Rebecca Perrera motioned to recommend approval of Z-103-25-8, per the staff 
recommendation with a modification to Stipulation No. 2 adding the standard language 
requiring 25 percent accent material, and the following additional stipulations:  
• The development shall be in general conformance with the elevations date  
stamped October 22, 2025, as modified by the following stipulations and 
approved by the Planning and Development Department.  
• The landscape plan and sign plan shall be presented for review and comment to  
the Laveen Village Planning Committee prior to final site plan approval.  
   Linda Abegg second the motion.  
 
Vote: 
10-0, motion to recommend approval of Z-103-25-8, per the staff recommendation, 
with a modification and additional stipulations passed with Committee Members

Laveen Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Z-103-25-8 
October 20, 2025 
Page 4 of 6 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Abegg, McCann, Nasser-Taylor, Ortega, Perrera, Rubio-Raffin, Serrette, Barraza, 
Jensen, and Hurd in favor.  
 
Recommended Stipulations:  
 
1. 
The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date 
stamped October 6, 2025, as modified by the following stipulations and approved 
by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
 
2. 
THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE 
ELEVATIONS DATE STAMPED OCTOBER 22, 2025, AS MODIFIED BY THE 
FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND 
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.  
 
 
2.  
3. 
All perimeter street facing building elevations shall contain architectural features 
that reflect modern agrarian architecture AND SHALL CONSIST OF A 
MINIMUM 25% NON-STUCCO ACCENT MATERIAL including, but not limited 
to, DETAILING SUCH AS pitched roof elements, variation in window size, 
overhang canopies and exterior accent materials such as metal, wood, and 
stone, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
 
4. 
 
THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND SIGN PLAN SHALL BE PRESENTED FOR 
REVIEW AND COMMENT TO THE LAVEEN VILLAGE PLANNING 
COMMITTEE PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL.  
 
 
3. 
5. 
Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be 
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other 
pavement treatments that visually contrast parking and drive aisle surfaces, as 
approved by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
 
4. 
6. 
A minimum of 25% of uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be shaded, as 
approved by the Planning and Development Department. Shade may be 
achieved by structures or by minimum 2-inch caliper, drought tolerant, shade 
trees, or a combination thereof. 
 
 
5. 
7. 
Large canopy evergreen trees shall be planted within the north landscape 
setbacks, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.  
 
 
6. 
8. 
The east, north, and west perimeter landscape setbacks shall be planted with 
minimum 2-inch caliper, large canopy, drought-tolerant, shade trees planted 20 
feet on center, or in equivalent groupings, as approved by the Planning and 
Development Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work 
with the Planning and Development Department on alternative design solutions 
consistent with a pedestrian environment. 
 
 
7. 
Bicycle parking shall be provided, consistent with Section 1307.H of the Phoenix

Laveen Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Z-103-25-8 
October 20, 2025 
Page 5 of 6 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
9. 
Zoning Ordinance. 
 
 
8. 
10. 
A 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE) shall be dedicated along 
Baseline Road and a minimum 10-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) shall be 
constructed within the easement in accordance with the MAG supplemental 
detail and as approved or modified by the Planning and Development 
Department. 
 
 
9. 
11. 
A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for stormwater 
management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the Planning and 
Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This includes but is not 
limited to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales, permeable pavement, etc., 
per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure and Low Impact 
Development Details for Alternative Stormwater Management. 
 
 
10. 
12. 
Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that 
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the City of Phoenix Businesses 
Water Efficiency Program for a minimum of 10 years, or as approved by the 
Planning and Development Department. 
 
 
11. 
13. 
A minimum of 10% of the required vehicle parking spaces shall include EV 
Ready infrastructure. 
 
 
12. 
14. 
A minimum 6-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum 10-foot-wide 
landscape area shall be constructed on the north side of Baseline Road, and 
planted as follows: 
 
 
 
 
a. 
Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, drought-tolerant, 
shade trees, planted 20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings. 
 
 
 
 
b. 
Drought-tolerant shrubs, accents and vegetative groundcovers 
maintained to a maximum height of 24 inches to achieve a minimum of 
75% live coverage. 
 
  
 
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and 
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a 
pedestrian environment. 
 
 
13. 
15. 
All mitigation improvements shall be constructed and/or funded as identified in 
the accepted Traffic Impact Analysis dated May 23, 2025. 
 
 
14. 
16. 
All existing electrical utilities within the public right-of-way shall be  
undergrounded, adjacent to the development, or as otherwise approved by  
the Street Transportation Department and the Planning and Development  
Department. The developer shall coordinate with the affected utility 
companies for their review and permitting.

Laveen Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Z-103-25-8 
October 20, 2025 
Page 6 of 6 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
 
15.  
17. 
Existing SRP facilities along Baseline Road are to be relocated outside of City 
right-of-way, unless otherwise approved by the Street Transportation 
Department. Relocations that require additional dedications or land transfer 
require completion prior to obtaining plat and/or civil plan review approval. 
 
 
16. 
18. 
Replace unused driveways with sidewalk, curb, and gutter. Also, replace any 
broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on all streets and 
upgrade all off-site improvements to be in compliance with current ADA 
guidelines. 
 
 
17. 
19. 
All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with 
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, 
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and 
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA 
accessibility standards. 
 
 
18. 
20. 
If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall 
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the 
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to 
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval. 
 
 
19. 
21. 
If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the 
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified 
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the 
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations. 
 
 
20. 
22. 
In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the 
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot 
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the 
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials. 
 
 
21. 
23. 
Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207 
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County 
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning 
application file for record. 
 
 
Staff comments regarding VPC Recommendation:  
 
Staff recommends updating Stipulation No. 4 to require the review and comment prior 
to preliminary site plan approval.