Attachment B - Staff Report - PHO-4-25--Z-47-87-1-3.pdf

Staff Report: PHO-4-25--Z-47-87-1(3) 
October 30, 2025 
APPLICATION #: 
PHO-4-25--Z-47-87-1(3) 
LOCATION: 
Northeast corner of 32nd Street and Sunnyside Lane 
EXISTING ZONING: 
R-O
ACREAGE: 
1.12 
REQUEST: 
Request to modify Stipulation 1 regarding general 
conformance to the site plan date stamped April 16, 1999 
and the elevations date stamped May 18, 1999. 
APPLICANT: 
Lee Wright, Metronet Infrastructure Group, LLC. 
OWNER: 
Lee Wright, Metronet Infrastructure Group, LLC. 
REPRESENTATIVE: 
Lee Wright, Metronet Infrastructure Group, LLC. 
STAFF RECOMMENDATION 
Approval with additional stipulations, per the Planning Hearing Officer (PHO) 
recommendation. 
PLANNING HEARING OFFICER RECOMMENDATION 
On September 17, 2025, the Planning Hearing Officer recommended approval with 
additional stipulations. 
VILLAGE PLANNING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION 
The Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee (VPC) heard the request on 
September 8, 2025 and recommended denial by a vote of 11-1. 
*REVISED*
November 4, 2025
ATTACHMENT B

Staff Report-PHO-4-25--Z-47-87-1(3) 
 
November 6, 2025 Planning Commission 
Page 2 of 6 
 
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS 
 
The subject site consists of 1.12 gross acres located at the northeast corner of 32nd 
Street and Sunnyside Lane and is zoned R-O (Residential Office-Restricted 
Commercial). The applicant requested a modification to Stipulation No. 1 regarding 
general conformance with the site plan date stamped April 16, 1999 and the elevations 
date stamped May 18, 1999 (Exhibit B). 
 
The appellants argue the following points:  
 
• The proposed narrative and site plan indicate incorrect dates. The appellants 
indicate the site plan date stamped September 9, 2000 should be the approved 
drawings to replace in Stipulation 1.  
• The proposed use does not fit the vision for the City of Phoenix’s North 32nd 
Street Revitalization Project.  
• The unmanned structure will be inviting homeless and security related issues to 
the site.  
• The use is not a public utility. 
• No Use Permit approval on file for a public utility use on the site.  
• The R-O zoning district indicating office use or other low impact development to 
the neighboring residential should be proposed, rather than an unmanned public 
utility.  
• The CC&Rs were never amended to allow the R-O zoning.  
• The Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee voted 11-1 to deny the 
modification to Stipulation No. 1.  
• Lack of response from the community regarding questions raised at the Planning 
Hearing Officer Virtual Meeting.  
• The agreement information for the public utility was never presented to the 
public.  
• No environmental studies or climate plans have been conducted for this site 
concerning neighboring residential areas about safety and noise.  
• No Storm Water Management plan exists for this site.  
• Future development of cell towers on the proposed site.  
• Risk of reduced property value, income loss from short term rentals, security, 
blight, and other negative neighborhood impacts.  
 
One of the appellants also submitted a petition that contains 84 signatures from nearby 
residents in opposition to the proposed ILA Hut stating the development would have a 
negative impact on the community and property values. (Exhibit A)

Staff Report-PHO-4-25--Z-47-87-1(3) 
November 6, 2025 Planning Commission 
Page 3 of 6 
PREVIOUS HISTORY 
On September 16, 1987, the Phoenix City Council heard Rezoning Case No. Z-47-87-1, 
a request to rezone approximately 2.23 acres located at the southeast corner of 32nd 
Street and Greenway Lane from R1-14 (One family Residence) to C-O/G-O 
(Commercial Office District, General Office Option – Restricted Commercial). The City 
Council recommended denial as filed per the Planning Commission’s recommendation 
and approved R-O (Residential Office – Restricted Commercial). 
On June 9, 1999, the Phoenix City Council concurred with the recommendation of the 
Planning Hearing Officer for approval of PHO-1-89—Z-47-87-1(3), a request for a six-
month time extension of the conditional zoning time stipulation and general site plan 
conformance, subject to stipulations. 
On June 28, 1999, the Phoenix City Council concurred with the recommendation of the 
Planning Hearing Officer for approval of PHO-2-99—Z-47-87-1(3), a request for a time 
extension of conditional zoning; and general site plan conformance, subject to 
stipulations.  
On February 8, 2012 the Phoenix City Council concurred with the recommendation of 
the Planning Hearing Officer for approval of PHO-3-11—Z-47-87-1(3), a request for 
Administrative action to modify Stipulation No. 5 to extend or remove the conditional 
time stipulation, or determine compliance with schedule for development or take 
legislative action to revert the R-O zoning to its former R1-14 zoning classification due 
to noncompliance with  rezoning stipulations. The City Council ratified the item as 
recommended by the Planning Hearing Officer for approval of the deletion of Stipulation 
No. 5. (Exhibit E). 
NEIGHBORHOOD CONCERNS 
Public Correspondence 
Besides the appeals received, one letter of opposition was received, indicating 
concerns regarding noise, unsightly condition, decrease in property value, blight, 
homelessness and the absence of a completed environmental study. A petition of 
opposition was submitted containing over 75 signatures, requesting the denial of PHO-
4-25—Z-47-87-1(3) (Exhibit N).
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION 
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units / acre

Staff Report-PHO-4-25--Z-47-87-1(3) 
November 6, 2025 Planning Commission 
Page 3 of 6 
CHARACTER OF SURROUNDING LAND USE 
Zoning 
Land Use 
On-site 
(overall development site): 
R-O
Vacant land 
North: 
R-O
Vacant land 
North (Across Greenway Lane): 
C-2 
Convenience Market, 
Auto Sales 
East: 
R1-14 
Single-Family Residential 
South (Across Sunnyside Lane): 
R1-14 
Single-Family Residential 
West (Across 32nd Street): 
R1-14 
School District Office 
PLANNING HEARING OFFICER FINDINGS
1) The request to modify Stipulation 1 regarding general conformance to a site plan
and elevations is recommended for approval. The proposed project, a fiber-optic
service communications hut, will have access to the right-of-way from a
proposed concrete drive immediately west of the parcel. The parcel is currently
undeveloped, and the development will include an approximately 864-square foot
hut, natural gas back-up generator, CMU block screening wall around the
compound and landscaping throughout the entire parcel. The proposed
development is less intense and will create less traffic, sound and impact on the
surrounding neighborhood. The proposal is compatible with and consistent with
development in the surrounding area.
2) The applicant did not submit a Proposition 207 waiver of claims prior to the
Planning Hearing Officer hearing. Submittal of this form is an application
requirement. An additional stipulation is recommended to require the applicant to
record this form and deliver it to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.
3) The site is identified as archaeologically sensitive and three additional
stipulations are recommended to be included to address requirements for
archaeological survey and testing.

Staff Report-PHO-4-25--Z-47-87-1(3) 
November 6, 2025 Planning Commission 
Page 5 of 6 
PLANNING HEARING OFFICER RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS 
1. 
That THE development SHALL be in general conformance with the site 
plan AND ELEVATIONS DATE STAMPED AUGUST 7, 2025, AS 
MODIFIED BY THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS AND APPROVED 
BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. presented 
as modified by the site plan dated April 16, 1999, and elevation dated 
May 18, 1999 for the south portion of site. 
2. 
That An 8-foot landscaped setback SHALL be provided along the east 
property line including 24-inch box size, drought-resistant shade trees 
planted 20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings. 
3. 
That No trash dumpsters SHALL be located within 50 feet of the east 
property line. 
4. 
That The building height SHALL be limited to one story (17 feet 4 inches) 
5. 
That A one-foot vehicular non access easement SHALL be placed along 
both Sunnyside Lane and Greenway Lane. 
6. 
That A cross access SHALL be provided on the north portion of the site 
upon final site plan approval for the north property, or in the alternative, a 
common driveway entrance be provided, as approved by the Planning and 
Development Department. 
7. 
PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER SHALL 
EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE 
WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY 
RECORDER'S OFFICE AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE 
INCLUDED IN THE REZONING APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD. 
8. 
IF DETERMINED NECESSARY BY THE PHOENIX ARCHAEOLOGY 
OFFICE, THE APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT PHASE I DATA TESTING 
AND SUBMIT AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT OF THE 
DEVELOPMENT AREA FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY 
ARCHAEOLOGIST PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRUBBING, 
LANDSCAPE SALVAGE, AND/OR GRADING APPROVAL. 
9. 
IF PHASE I DATA TESTING IS REQUIRED, AND IF, UPON REVIEW OF 
THE RESULTS FROM THE PHASE I DATA TESTING, THE CITY 
ARCHAEOLOGIST, IN CONSULTATION WITH A QUALIFIED 
ARCHAEOLOGIST, DETERMINES SUCH DATA RECOVERY 
EXCAVATIONS ARE NECESSARY, THE APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT 
PHASE II ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA RECOVERY EXCAVATIONS. 
10. 
IN THE EVENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL MATERIALS ARE ENCOUNTERED 
DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE DEVELOPER SHALL IMMEDIATELY 
CEASE ALL GROUND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES WITHIN A 33-FOOT

Staff Report-PHO-4-25--Z-47-87-1(3) 
November 6, 2025 Planning Commission 
Page 6 of 6 
Exhibits: 
A- Appeal Documents (19 pages)
B- Applicant’s Narrative for PHO-4-25--Z-47-87-1(3) (2 pages)
C- Aerial Map
D- Zoning Map
E- Approval Letter for PHO-3-11--Z-47-87-1(3) (2 pages)
F- Sketch Map for Z-48-87-1(3)
G- PHO Summary for PHO-4-25--Z-47-87-1(3) from September 17, 2025 (5 pages)
H- VPC Summary for PHO-4-25--Z-47-87-1(3) from September 8, 2025 (6 pages)
I- Conceptual Site Plan, date stamped August 7, 2025 (2 pages)
J- Conceptual Landscape Plan, date stamped August 7, 2025
K- Conceptual Elevations, date stamped August 7, 2025 (4 pages)
L- Stipulated Site Plan for PHO-4-25—Z-47-87-1(3)
M-Stipulated Elevations for PHO-4-25—Z-47-87-1(3)
N – Correspondence (10 pages)*
RADIUS OF THE DISCOVERY, NOTIFY THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST, 
AND ALLOW TIME FOR THE ARCHAEOLOGY OFFICE TO PROPERLY 
ASSESS THE MATERIALS.

EXHIBIT A

(;+,%,7%

11880 College BLVD, Suite 100 | Overland Park, KS 66210 
metronet.com 
 
 
 
www.metronet.com 
 
August 7th, 2025 
 
 
Mr. Byron Easton 
Planning Hearing Officer 
City of Phoenix, AZ Development Services Department 
200 W. Washington St, 2nd Floor 
Phoenix, AZ 85003 
 
 
Re: PHO Stipulation Modification from PHO-3-11--Z-47-87-1 
 
 
 
Mr. Easton, 
 
 
 
We, Metronet Infrastructure Group, LLC (Metronet/Vexus), request the Planning Hearing Officer’s approval to 
modify a stipulation for our development parcel. Metronet/Vexus is a fiber-optic service provider that is 
proposing the communications hut located at 3206 E. Sunnyside LN/15051 N 32ND ST. The parcel is currently 
undeveloped, and our proposed development would include an 864sqft hut, natural gas back-up generator, 
CMU block screening wall around our compound, and landscaping of the whole parcel.  
 
Metronet/Vexus is requesting to modify stipulation #1 of the Zoning Case PHO-3-11--Z-47-87-1. The stipulation 
reads: 
1. That development be in general conformance with the site plan presented as modified by the site 
plan dated August 1, 2025 April 16, 1999, and elevation dated August 1, 2025 May 18, 1999, for the 
north south portion of the site.  
 
The attached/submitted site plan and elevations will show a smaller development, which would be located on 
the Northern middle of the parcel, with access coming off 32nd Ave. The rest of the parcel would be landscaped 
per city requirements/standards. This will be an unmanned communications hut to provide fiber-optic service to 
the residents of Phoenix. Minimal traffic will be on site after construction, besides for normal maintenance of 
the building, equipment and landscaping. The existing site plan has shown a proposed building of 8,500sqft, 
with 35 parking spaces. This is a major decrease in development size adjacent to a residential property.  
 
All other stipulations to the zoning case PHO-3-11--Z-47-87-1, will be met by Metronet. Those stipulations are: 
2. That an 8-foot landscaped setback be provided along the east property line including 24-inch box 
size, drought-resistant shade trees planted 20’ on center, or in equivalent groupings.  
3. That no trash dumpsters will be located within 50 feet of the east property line.  
4. That the building height be limited to one story (17 feet, 4 inches) 
5. That a one-foot vehicular non-access easement be placed along both Sunnyside Lane and 
Greenway Lane.  
6. That cross access be provided on the north portion of the site upon final site plan approval for the 
north property, or in the alternative, a common driveway entrance be provided, as approved by the 
Planning and Development Department.

11880 College BLVD, Suite 100 | Overland Park, KS 66210 
metronet.com 
 
 
 
www.metronet.com 
 
 
 
 
 
This development is necessary to provide fiber-optic service to the residents and businesses of Phoenix. 
Construction of the development should take around 2 months to complete, baring any inspection delays. We 
would like to have planning approval as soon as possible, so we could seek a building permit immediately after 
approval.  
 
 
 
Please let us know if you have any questions or concerns about our development. 
 
 
 
Sincerely, 
 
 
Lee W. Wright, P.E. 
Metronet Infrastructure Group, LLC 
11880 College BLVD, Suite 100 
Overland Park, KS 66214

EXHIBIT C

R-O*
R1-14
C-2
N 32ND ST
E SUNNYSIDE LN
mapservices@phoenix.gov
Planning & Development Department
PHO-4-25--Z-47-87-1(3) Property Location: Northeast corner of 32nd Street and Sunnyside Lane
0
90
180
45
Feet ´

EXHIBIT D

R-O*
R1-14
C-2
N 32ND ST
E SUNNYSIDE LN
Planning & Development Department
PHO-4-25--Z-47-87-1(3)
Property Location: Northeast corner of 32nd Street and Sunnyside Lane
0
90
180
45
Feet ´

EXHIBIT E

Mod

EXHIBIT F

EXHIBIT G

REPORT OF PLANNING HEARING OFFICER ACTION  
Byron Easton, Planner III, Hearing Officer  
Teresa Garcia, Planner I, Assisting  
 
September 17, 2025 
 
ITEM NO: 1 
 
 
DISTRICT NO. 3 
SUBJECT: 
 
 
 
Application #: 
PHO 4-25--Z-47-87-1(3) 
Location: 
Northeast corner of 32nd Street and Sunnyside Lane 
Zoning:  
R-O 
Acreage:  
1.12 
Request: 
1) 
Request to modify Stipulation 1 regarding general 
conformance to the site plan date stamped April 16, 
1999 and the elevations date stamped May 18, 1999. 
Applicant: 
Lee Wright, Metronet Infrastructure Group, LLC 
Owner: 
 
Lee Wright, Metronet Infrastructure Group, LLC 
Representative: 
Lee Wright, Metronet Infrastructure Group, LLC 
 
ACTIONS: 
 
Planning Hearing Officer Recommendation:  The Planning Hearing Officer 
recommended approval with additional stipulations. 
 
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:  The Paradise Valley 
Village Planning Committee heard the request on September 8, 2025 and 
recommended denial by a vote of 11-1. 
 
DISCUSSION: 
 
Lee Wright, representative with Metronet Infrastructure Group LLC, introduced 
the background of Metronet, a fiber optic provider. He stated the request is to 
modify Stipulation 1 regarding general conformance to a previously approved site 
plan dated April 16, 1999 and elevations dated May 18, 1999.  He indicated the 
stipulated site plan shows an 8,500 square foot office building and the proposed 
site plan includes an 850 square foot Inline Amplification Hut (ILA Hut). 
 
Byron Easton, Planning Hearing Officer, asked for clarification on the size of the 
previously approved building. 
 
Mr. Wright responded 8,500 square feet (office building) as shown on the site 
plan from 1999. Mr. Wright stated that the proposed hut would be located on the 
north side of the parcel enclosed by a 75-foot X 75-foot CMU block wall. He

Planning Hearing Officer Summary of September 17, 2025 
Application PHO-4-25-Z-47-87-1(3) 
Page 2 
 
added the ingress and egress to the site would be located off 32nd Street. He 
also included the site would meet all landscaping requirements. 
 
Mr. Easton asked for the height of the wall around the proposed site.  
 
Mr. Wright responded that the applicant is proposing a 6-foot wall but they would 
be willing to go as high as necessary.  Mr. Wright noted the 12-foot-tall building 
would be concealed behind the CMU block wall. He added the east/west 
elevations are the shorter side at 24 feet wide, with air conditioners on each side, 
and the north/south elevations feature an entry door on each side. 
 
Mr. Easton asked what the stipulated height was. 
 
Logan Zappolo, Planning Hearing Officer Assistant, confirmed it was taller (17 
feet, 4 inches) than is currently proposed.   
 
Chinnaz Sayegh, member of the public in opposition, stated her properties will be 
affected by the proposed development. She noted that she operates a Short-
Term Rental (STR) close to the subject site and said there is no record in the 
CC&R’s that the lots were changed from residential to office use. She continued 
to state that the proposal will affect her investment, source of income, will create 
blight, and will negatively affect neighborhood safety. She included this use 
should be relocated to either a commercial or industrial site.  
 
Mr. Wright added that fiber-optic service is considered a public utility, is 
registered with the city and state, and is allowed to be located on this site as a 
public utility use.  
 
Brett Reall, member in opposition, asked if there will be any intensification of this 
use on this site. He included concerns regarding radio frequency transmissions, 
small cell or macro sites in the future. 
 
Mr. Wright stated this application is only for a fiber optic hut. He included they 
have their own stipulations to only allow one ILA Hut on the parcel. There will be 
no more huts, or intensification of the use. He included that they cannot sell or 
lease the land to any other companies. Mr. Wright added they are only a fiber 
optic provider, there will be no RF’s, cell phone towers, cellphone providers, 5G 
towers or small cells.  
 
Ms. Sayegh asked where the documentation is that says he is allowed to have 
the hut at this location.  
 
Mr. Easton stated that through City review it has been determined the proposed 
development is considered a public utility.

Planning Hearing Officer Summary of September 17, 2025 
Application PHO-4-25-Z-47-87-1(3) 
Page 3 
 
Mr. Easton stated correspondence was submitted for the case, including from 
Ms. Sayegh, indicating concerns regarding noise, unsightly condition, decrease 
in property value, blight, homelessness and the absence of a completed 
environmental study. Mr. Easton stated the correspondence in opposition 
received was focused on the use, but that is not the intent of the PHO hearing. 
The focus of the PHO hearing is to determine if the proposed building is in 
general conformance to the stipulated site plan.  He added the Paradise Valley 
Village Planning Committee heard the case on September 8, 2025 and 
recommended denial by a vote of 11-1.  Mr. Easton recommended that the 
proposed modification of Stipulation 1 be approved regarding general 
conformance to the site plan and elevations. He stated that the site has been 
identified as archaeologically sensitive and that three additional stipulations will 
be added to address related requirements. He also added a stipulation requiring 
a Recorded Proposition 207 Waiver prior to final site plan approval. 
 
FINDINGS: 
 
1) The request to modify Stipulation 1 regarding general conformance to a 
site plan and elevations is recommended for approval. The proposed 
project, a fiber-optic service communications hut, will have access to the 
ROW from a proposed concrete drive immediately west of the parcel. The 
parcel is currently undeveloped, and the development will include an 
approximately 864 square foot hut, natural gas back-up generator, CMU 
block screening wall around the compound and landscaping throughout 
the entire parcel. The proposed development is less intense and will 
create less traffic, sound and impact on the surrounding neighborhood. 
The proposal is compatible with and consistent with development in the 
surrounding area. 
 
2) The applicant did not submit a Proposition 207 waiver of claims prior to 
the Planning Hearing Officer hearing. Submittal of this form is an 
application requirement.  An additional stipulation is recommended to 
require the applicant to record this form and deliver it to the City to be 
included in the rezoning application file for record. 
 
3) The site is identified as archaeologically sensitive and three additional 
stipulations are recommended to be included to address requirements for 
archaeological survey and testing. 
 
STIPULATIONS: 
 
1. 
That THE development SHALL be in general conformance with the site 
plan AND ELEVATIONS DATE STAMPED AUGUST 7, 2025, AS 
MODIFIED BY THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS AND APPORVED BY 
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. presented as

Planning Hearing Officer Summary of September 17, 2025 
Application PHO-4-25-Z-47-87-1(3) 
Page 4 
 
modified by the site plan dated April 16, 1999 and elevations dated May 
18, 1999 for the south portion of site. 
 
 
2. 
That An 8-foot landscaped setback SHALL be provided along the east 
property line including 24-inch box size drought-resistant shade trees 
planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings. 
 
 
3. 
That No trash dumpsters SHALL be located within 50 feet of the east 
property line. 
 
 
4. 
That The building height SHALL be limited to one story (17 feet 4 inches) 
5. 
That A one-foot vehicular non access easement SHALL be placed along 
both Sunnyside Lane and Greenway Lane. 
 
 
6. 
That A cross access SHALL be provided on the north portion of the site 
upon final site plan approval for the north property or in the alternative a 
common driveway entrance be provided, as approved by the Planning and 
Development Department. 
 
 
7. 
PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER SHALL 
EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE 
WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY 
RECORDER'S OFFICE AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE 
INCLUDED IN THE REZONING APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD. 
 
 
8. 
IF DETERMINED NECESSARY BY THE PHOENIX ARCHAEOLOGY 
OFFICE, THE APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT PHASE I DATA TESTING 
AND SUBMIT AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT OF THE 
DEVELOPMENT AREA FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY 
ARCHAEOLOGIST PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRUBBING, 
LANDSCAPE SALVAGE, AND/OR GRADING APPROVAL. 
 
 
9. 
IF PHASE I DATA TESTING IS REQUIRED, AND IF, UPON REVIEW OF 
THE RESULTS FROM THE PHASE I DATA TESTING, THE CITY 
ARCHAEOLOGIST, IN CONSULTATION WITH A QUALIFIED 
ARCHAEOLOGIST, DETERMINES SUCH DATA RECOVERY 
EXCAVATIONS ARE NECESSARY, THE APPLICANT SHALL 
CONDUCT PHASE II ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA RECOVERY 
EXCAVATIONS. 
 
 
10. 
IN THE EVENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL MATERIALS ARE ENCOUNTERED 
DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE DEVELOPER SHALL IMMEDIATELY 
CEASE ALL GROUND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES WITHIN A 33-FOOT 
RADIUS OF THE DISCOVERY, NOTIFY THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST,

Planning Hearing Officer Summary of September 17, 2025 
Application PHO-4-25-Z-47-87-1(3) 
Page 5 
 
AND ALLOW TIME FOR THE ARCHAEOLOGY OFFICE TO PROPERLY 
ASSESS THE MATERIALS. 
 
 
 
Upon request, this publication will be made available within a reasonable length 
of time through appropriate auxiliary aids or services to accommodate an 
individual with a disability. This publication may be made available through the 
following auxiliary aids or services: large print, Braille, audiotape or computer 
diskette. To request a reasonable accommodation, please contact Saneeya Mir 
at saneeya.mir@phoenix.gov or (602) 686-6461 or TTY: 7-1-1.

EXHIBIT H

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
PHO-4-25—Z-47-87-1(3) 
 
 
 
 
Date of VPC Meeting 
September 8, 2025 
Date of Planning 
Hearing Officer Hearing 
September 17, 2025 
Request 
Modification of Stipulation 1 regarding general 
conformance to the site plan date stamped April 16, 
1999 and the elevations date stamped May 18, 1999. 
Location 
Northeast corner of 32nd Street and Sunnyside Lane 
VPC Recommendation 
Denial 
VPC Vote 
11-1 
 
 
VPC DISCUSSION: 
 
Four members of the public registered to speak on this item, in opposition. 
 
Staff Background Presentation 
Adrian Zambrano, staff, provided a background presentation of the request and stated 
the site is 1.12 acres and zoned R-O (Restricted Commercial). Mr. Zambrano noted the 
original rezoning case, Z-47-87-1, is subject to six stipulations. Mr. Zambrano displayed 
the original site plan and shared the original stipulations. Mr. Zambrano then provided 
background on the last three Planning Hearing Officer cases, PHO-1-89—Z-47-87-1, 
PHO-2-99—Z-47-87-1, and PHO-3-11—Z-47-87-1(3), including each request, their 
stipulations, and the site plan and elevations for PHO-2-99—Z-47-87-1. Mr. Zambrano 
summarized the request and proposal and displayed the site plan, landscape plan, and 
elevations. 
 
Applicant Presentation 
Lee Wright, with Metronet Infrastructure Group, LLC, introduced himself and provided 
an overview of the proposal. Mr. Wright stated that the hut would be an enclosed 
unmanned facility screened by a six-foot-tall CMU block wall. Mr. Wright stated that the 
hut would be a pre-cast manufactured building up to 12 feet tall. Mr. Wright added that 
there would be a natural gas back-up generator, which would only run once a week for 
maintenance. Mr. Wright stated that the vehicular driveway would be from 32nd Avenue 
and the rest of the parcel would be landscaped per City requirements. Mr. Wright 
displayed the landscape plan and elevations. Mr. Wright noted that the building footprint 
from the previous office building that was proposed compared to this proposal is about a

Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
PHO-4-25—Z-47-87-1(3) 
Page 2 of 6 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
90 percent reduction in size, with the new building footprint proposed as 834 square 
feet. 
 
Questions from the Committee 
Committee Member Jennifer Hall asked what the purpose of the hut is for. Mr. Wright 
responded that it is for all fiber that would be servicing the residences of Phoenix. Mr. 
Wright stated that it would be the main office for fiber. Committee Member Hall asked if 
there would be above ground utility lines. Mr. Wright responded that all wiring would be 
located underground within the public right-of-way. Committee Member Hall asked if 
there are more of these facilities in Phoenix. Mr. Wright responded that this is the first 
Metronet hut in Phoenix, but there is one under construction in Glendale. Committee 
Member Hall asked what this land use would be considered in the Phoenix Zoning 
Ordinance.  
 
Mr. Zambrano responded that it would probably fall under the public utility building or 
facility use, which is allowed in residential districts. Committee Member Hall asked 
what would happen with the north parcel. Mr. Zambrano responded that the north parcel 
would still remain vacant, and the original stipulations would still apply to the north 
parcel. Mr. Zambrano added that any new development that comes to the north parcel 
would have to go through the Planning Hearing Officer public hearing process to modify 
the stipulation for general conformance to the site plan and elevations. 
 
Committee Member Daniel Mazza asked if this would support fiber for Cox customers. 
Mr. Wright responded that it would not. Mr. Wright stated that Metronet is a 
construction company that places fiber for T-Fiber, which is T-Mobile. 
 
Committee Member Robert Goodhue asked what the decibel level is of the 
mechanical equipment. Mr. Wright responded that it is about the same level as a 
standard car at the maximum level. Committee Member Goodhue asked if the property 
would be subject to the City noise ordinance regarding noise levels. 
 
Mr. Zambrano responded that it may be in the City Code. Mr. Zambrano stated that 
there is no specific zoning requirement regarding noise levels, but it could be added as 
a stipulation by the Committee if desired.  
 
Committee Member Toby Gerst asked if the proposal is similar to a wireless 
communication facility and asked what the facility does. Mr. Wright responded that it 
houses all the equipment to run the fiber optic network. Mr. Wright stated that there 
would be no communication towers, and it has nothing to do with wireless 
communications or cellphones. Mr. Wright stated that they are a fiber optic company 
and everything they would be doing would be coming out of the proposed building and 
underground. 
 
Committee Member Hall stated that the Committee has been trying to turn 32nd Street 
into a unique corridor with restaurants and pedestrian activities. Committee Member 
Hall asked why Metronet chose this location. Mr. Wright responded that one of their 
main thoroughfares through the city is the nearby freeway and along Bell Road.

Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
PHO-4-25—Z-47-87-1(3) 
Page 3 of 6 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Committee Member Hall asked for clarification that Metronet wants to be close to those 
thoroughfares. Mr. Wright responded affirmatively and added that this hut would 
connect to the hut in Glendale. Committee Member Hall stated that she is concerned 
because this site is along 32nd Street. Mr. Wright responded that the corner would be 
improved and would likely look like a park with the amount of landscaping that would be 
planted. 
 
Public Comments 
Erika Smith Royal introduced herself as a nearby neighbor, opposed to the project. 
Ms. Royal stated that these lots are within the Sunnyside Acres subdivision, which has 
recorded Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs). Ms. Royal stated that she 
has done extensive research and has not been able to find documentation that 
amended the CC&Rs for rezoning Lots 18 and 19. Ms. Royal stated that the proposed 
fiber optic hut is not consistent with the residential office uses per the R-O zoning 
district. Ms. Royal stated that the community is opposed to the shelter being built on this 
lot. Ms. Royal added that the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance states that a Use Permit is 
required for public utility buildings and facilities within the R-O zoning district. Ms. Royal 
summarized the conditions that must be met in order for the Hearing Officer to rule 
favorably on a Use Permit request. Ms. Royal expressed concerns with property values, 
homeless people, trash dumping, precedent for this use, and environmental impacts. 
 
Committee Member Anna Sepic asked where in the CC&Rs would it limit land uses. 
Ms. Royal responded that the majority of the property owners have to agree to approve 
what is being stipulated. Ms. Royal shared a copy of the CC&Rs. 
 
Committee Member Robert Goodhue stated that CC&Rs are a private matter that 
does not concern the City. Committee Member Goodhue stated that the City does not 
include CC&Rs in zoning approvals or City approvals.  
 
Victoria Vinson introduced herself as a nearby neighbor, opposed to the project. Ms. 
Vinson stated that the community has worked hard to improve the community and to 
make it nice. Ms. Vison stated that the proposed hut would invite more homeless people 
into the area. Ms. Vinson expressed concerns with noise levels.  
 
Gene Colucci expressed concerns with the electrical components and fire near a 
residential community. Mr. Colucci stated that there was an explosion in Downtown 
Phoenix a few years ago. Mr. Colucci stated that residents in the community also have 
animals and expressed concerns with potential impacts to the animals. Mr. Colucci 
stated that the shelter should be located within an industrial area rather than next to a 
residential area.  
 
Christian Marquez introduced himself as a nearby neighbor, opposed to the project. 
Mr. Marquez expressed concerns with property values and health impacts. Mr. Marquez 
stated that the shelter should be located within an industrial area rather than next to a 
residential area. Mr. Marquez added that there has been an issue in the neighborhood 
with homeless people that was recently resolved. Mr. Marquez expressed concerns with 
the site becoming a homeless encampment.

Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
PHO-4-25—Z-47-87-1(3) 
Page 4 of 6 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Applicant Response 
Mr. Wright stated that all the power will be coming from the north side from the existing 
utility easement, noting that it is a 600-amp service. Mr. Wright stated that natural gas 
would be tied into from the west along 32nd Street, once the natural gas upgrade is 
complete. Mr. Wright stated that there is an existing water meter off of 32nd Street that 
can be used. Mr. Wright stated that all fiber cables would be placed off of 32nd Street, 
underground. Mr. Wright stated that there would not be a cellphone tower on the site 
that would emit radio waves and there would be no radio frequencies at all. Mr. Wright 
stated that the power coming into the facility would be a lot less than the school across 
the street. Mr. Wright added that there is an electrical transmission site on 33rd Place 
nearby, which is probably more concerning than the proposed fiber optic hut. Mr. Wright 
stated that adding fiber to properties increases home values. Mr. Wright stated that the 
generator is louder than the air conditioning units at 81 decibels, and with the muffler on 
it, it would be less than a standard truck at 47 decibels. Mr. Wright stated that the 
generator would run in a 20-minute cycle once a week and would otherwise not be 
running unless there is a loss of power. Mr. Wright stated that they are a permitted use 
under the R-O zoning district, classified as a public utility building and facility. 
 
Committee Discussion 
Mr. Zambrano clarified that the Use Permit requirement for public utility buildings and 
facilities within the R-O zoning district is specifically for repair and/or storage facilities, 
including outdoor, as accessory to a public utility building and facility. 
 
Committee Member Gerst asked how many fiber optic facilities are located within the 
City of Phoenix. Mr. Wright responded that he does not know. Committee Member 
Gerst asked what kind of studies have been done regarding fiber optic facilities and 
their health impacts on humans. Mr. Wright responded that he does not know.  
 
Committee Member Roy Wise stated that CenturyLink has been providing fiber optic 
all over the city, mostly in residential and commercial areas. Committee Member Wise 
stated that they are usually housed in a box, often seen at corners of intersections. 
Committee Member Wise stated that there is no electromagnetic force coming out of the 
fiber optic cables or its connections, so there is no effect on humans since it is all 
contained.  
 
Committee Member Mazza stated that he has fiber at his home from Cox and there is 
a box within his neighborhood that hums a little when walking by it. Committee Member 
Mazza asked if this is a fiber optic box. Committee Member Wise responded that this 
is the electrical power box to allow the fiber optic to function. Committee Member Wise 
stated that the electrical power is no different than the amount needed to power a 
house. Committee Member Wise stated that it would be a centralized facility, similar to 
the central offices that telephone services used to go through. Committee Member 
Mazza stated that the residents do not want to be guinea pigs for this new type of facility 
in Phoenix. Committee Member Wise stated that CenturyLink has a centralized facility 
within a residential community, on Doubletree Ranch Road between Scottsdale Road 
and 64th Street, which looks like a residential property because the Town of Paradise 
Valley wanted it to look like a house.

Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
PHO-4-25—Z-47-87-1(3) 
Page 5 of 6 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Chair Anita Mortensen asked the applicant to describe the size of the building again. 
Mr. Wright responded that the hut would be 24 feet by 36 feet and 12 feet tall, with the 
compound being 75 feet by 75 feet, which would be enclosed by a CMU block wall.  
 
Committee Member Hall stated that the Committee adopted the North 32nd Street 
Plan 10 years ago, which made a commitment to the community that 32nd Street would 
be transformed into a really special corridor. Committee Member Hall stated that she 
does not see how the proposed hut fits into what the community envisioned for 32nd 
Street.  
 
Committee Member Sepic asked if the proposed modification to the stipulation for the 
south lot affects the zoning for the north lot. Mr. Zambrano responded that it does not. 
Mr. Zambrano stated that the modified stipulations would only be for the south lot, and 
the original stipulations would still be applicable for the north lot. Mr. Zambrano stated 
that once development comes in for the north lot, they will have to go through the 
Planning Hearing Officer public hearing process again to modify the stipulation for 
general conformance to the site plan and elevations for the north lot. 
 
Committee Member Gerst asked what the noncompliance issue was. Mr. Zambrano 
responded that it was a previous PHO request, PHO-3-11—Z-47-87-1(3), which 
requested administrative action to modify Stipulation 5 to extend or remove the 
conditional time stipulation, or determine compliance with the schedule for development, 
or take legislative action to revert the R-O zoning to its former R1-14 zoning 
classification due to noncompliance with rezoning stipulations.  
 
Committee Member Sepic stated that she knows this corridor well and noted that it is a 
major transient corridor. Committee Member Sepic stated that she is not a fan of the 
project. Committee Member Sepic suggested the applicant approach APS to locate on 
their substation site near Greenway Road and the SR-51 freeway. Committee Member 
Sepic added that the applicant would still have to go through the process with the HOA 
to amend the CC&Rs, which would likely be an uphill battle with the neighbors in 
opposition.  
 
Committee Member Brendan Franks asked if this is part of Metronet’s business plan 
to be centrally located in order to get to as many customers as possible without there 
being any fiber waste. Mr. Wright responded that they have a giant plan for the entire 
Metropolitan Phoenix area.  
 
Committee Member Hall stated that she feels that this is a bad location for this type of 
facility. 
 
Committee Member Sepic echoed Committee Member Hall. 
 
MOTION – PHO-4-25—Z-47-87-1(3) 
Committee Member Hall motioned to recommend denial of PHO-4-25—Z-47-87-1(3). 
Committee Member Gerst seconded the motion.

Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
PHO-4-25—Z-47-87-1(3) 
Page 6 of 6 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
VOTE – PHO-4-25—Z-47-87-1(3) 
11-1; motion to recommend denial of PHO-4-25—Z-47-87-1(3) passes with Committee 
members Franks, Gerst, Goodhue, Gubser, Hall, Hamra, Mazza, Schmidt, Sepic, 
Sommer, and Mortensen in favor and Committee member Wise opposed. 
 
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION: 
 
None.

EXHIBIT I

IMPROVEMENT
PLANS FOR
METRONET SHELTER
DATE
DESCRIPTION
SUBMITTALS
REV
SCALE:
SITE ADDRESS:
SITE NAME:
SHEET NUMBER:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGN ENG:
REVIEWED BY:
1
LWW
JDF
LWW
SHEET NAME:
COVER SHEET
NTS
METRONET PROPOSED
UNMANED  NETWORK
 COMMUNICATIONS SHELTER
1"=100'
3206 SUNNYSIDE LN
PHOENIX SHELTER
PERMITTING
A
2/18/25
08/01/2025
PHO-4-25--Z-47-87-1(3)
Proposed Conceptual Site Plan
Hearing Date: September 17, 2025

199'-1011
16"
P/L
P/L
P/L
P/L
P/L
P/L
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
OWNER: SAYEGH JOHN S/CHINNCAZ
APN: 21460022D
ZONING: R1-14
OWNER: SAYEGH JOHN S/CHINNCAZ
APN: 21460022E
ZONING R1-14
OWNER: NAYEL-CHRISTY INVESTMENTS LLC
APN: 21460020
ZONING: R-O
OWNER:ERILLIAM LLC
APN: 21460018
ZONING: R1-14
OWNER: BEITMAN JASON
APN: 21460019
ZONING: R1-14
OWNER: METRONET INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP, LLC
APN: 21460021
ZONING: R-O
150KW
GEN
SET
24' W x 36'
L
DUAL HUT
SHELTER
X
X
GAS
X
X
X
X
X
X
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
P/L
P/L
P/L
P/L
P/L
P/L
P/L
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.
E.O.P
25'-3"
20'-0"
8'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
20'-0"
49'-2"
40'-0"
6' H 8" CMU MASONRY WALL
120/208VAC
3 PH 200
AMP MAIN
BREAKER
ROW TO CENTERLINE DIMENSION
33'X33' SVT
1' VEHICULAR
NON-ACCESS
EASEMENT
8' SIDE YARD LANDSCAPE SETBACK
20' SETBACK
10' SIDE YARD SETBACK
20' REAR SETBACK LINE
10' SIDE YARD SETBACK
12"W CONCRETE DRIVE.
PLACE 4"D CRUSHED
ROCK WITH WEED
BARRIER FABRIC
COMPOUND AREA
6'H 8" CMU MASONRY WALL
165'-01
4"
190'-015
32"
169'-315
32"
TRANSFORMER MEET POINT
WITH POWER COMPANY
10'X20' SVT
PARKING SPACE
DATE
DESCRIPTION
SUBMITTALS
REV
SCALE:
SITE NAME:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGN ENG:
REVIEWED BY:
5
LWW
JDF
LWW
SHEET NAME:
OVERALL SITE PLAN
1"=32'
SITE ADDRESS:
SHEET NUMBER:
3206 SUNNYSIDE LN
PHOENIX SHELTER
PERMITTING
A
2/18/25
LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
CENTERLINE
SEWER LINE
FIBER CONDUIT
ELECTRICAL CONDUIT
WATER LINE
P/L
E.O.P
City Notes:
  “Development and use of this site will conform with all applicable codes and
ordinances.”
  “All new or relocated utilities will be placed underground.”
  “Structures and landscaping within a triangle measured back 10’ from the property
line and 20’ along the
property line on each side of the driveways entrances will be maintained at a
maximum
height of 3’.”
   “Structures and landscaping within a triangle measuring 33’ x 33’ along the
property lines will be maintained
at a maximum height of 3’.”
   “Any lighting will be placed so as to direct light away from adjacent residential
districts and will not exceed
one foot candle at the property line.  No noise, odor, or vibration will be emitted at any
level exceeding the
general level of noise, odor, or vibration emitted by uses in the area outside of the
site.”
“Owners of property adjacent to public rights-of-way will have the responsibility for
maintaining all
landscaping located within the rights-of-way, in accordance with approved plans.”
   “All rooftop equipment and satellite dishes shall be screened to the height of the
tallest equipment.”
   “All service areas shall be screened to conceal trash containers, loading docks,
transformers, backflow
preventers and other mechanical or electrical equipment from eye level adjacent to all
public streets.”
  “Barbed, razor, or concertina wire (or similar) shall not be used on this site where
visible from public streets
or adjacent residential areas.”
  “All signage requires separate reviews, approvals, and permits.  No signs are
approved per this plan.”
SCALE BAR 1"=32'
10
0
20
30
32
5
08/01/2025
PHO-4-25--Z-47-87-1(3)
Proposed Conceptual Site Plan
Hearing Date: September 17, 2025

EXHIBIT J

P/L
P/L
P/L
P/L
P/L
P/L
P/L
P/L
P/L
P/L
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
E.O.P
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
150KW
GEN
SET
X
X
X
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
GAS
GAS
GAS
MetroNet
MetroNet
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
MetroNet
MetroNet
MetroNet
MetroNet
MetroNet
MetroNet
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
4-1.25 HDPE
P/L
P/L
P/L
P/L
METRONET SHELTER
JULY 30, 2025
3206 E. SUNNYSIDE LANE, PHOENIX,  AZ  85032
Landscape
Architects
Land
Planning
Irrigation
CHILOPSIS LINEARIS - DESERT WILLOW
PARKINSONIA X 'DESERT MUSEUM'
- DESERT MUSEUM PALO VERDE
CAESALPINIA PULCHERRIMA - RED BIRD OF PARADISE
CALLIANDRA CALIFORNICA - RED FAIRY DUSTER
EREMOPHILA HYGROPHANA - BLUE BELLS
LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS 'GREEN CLOUD'
- GREEN CLOUD TEXAS RANGER
TECOMA X 'SPARKY' - SPARKY TECOMA
ASCLEPIAS SUBULATA - DESERT MILKWEED
HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA - RED HESPERALOE
LANTANA MONTEVIDENSIS - PURPLE TRAILING LANTANA
LANTANA X 'NEW GOLD' - NEW GOLD LANTANA
DECOMPOSED GRANITE - T.B.D.
TREES
SHRUBS
ACCENTS
GROUND COVERS
SYMBOL
BOTANICAL NAME - COMMON NAME
QTY.
SIZE
COMMENTS
32,362 SQ.FT.
17
18
10
28
12
21
18
18
22
13
9
5 GAL
5 GAL
5 GAL
5 GAL
5 GAL
5 GAL
5 GAL
5 GAL
5 GAL
24" BOX
24" BOX
FULL CAN
FULL CAN
FULL CAN
FULL CAN
FULL CAN
FULL CAN
FULL CAN
FULL CAN
FULL CAN
STANDARD
STANDARD
PRELIMINARY PLANT LEGEND
EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN
SALVAGE MATERIAL
SEE
PLAN
-
-
NOTES:
1. DUE TO PLANT MATERIAL AVAILABILITY, SUBSTITUTIONS FOR PLANT MATERIAL
LISTED ABOVE MAY BE USED. ANY ALTERNATES OR SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE ON
THE ADWR LOW WATER USE PLANT LIST.
2. SUB-SPECIES OR HYBRIDS OF PLANT MATERIAL LISTED ABOVE MAY BE USED AS
ALTERNATES/SUBSTITUTIONS.
3. ADDITIONAL PLANT MATERIAL MAY BE ADDED TO THE LIST ABOVE DUE TO
UTILITY COMPANY OR H.O.A. REQUESTS AND/OR PLANTING RESTRICTIONS
WITHIN UTILITY EASEMENTS.
4. NO TREES TO BE LOCATED WITHIN THE P.U.E. OR ANY OTHER NOTED
EASEMENTS.
20'
10'
0'
60'
40'
SCALE:  1"=20'-0"
NORTH
PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN
E. SUNNYSIDE LANE
PROPERTY LINE
N. 32ND STREET
12' WIDE CONCRETE DRIVE
- SEE CIVIL PLANS
24' W X 36' L
DUAL HUT
SHELTER
25' R.O.W.
R.O.W.
WIDTH VARIES
EXISTING TREE
EXISTING SIDEWALK
EXISTING CMU WALL
14' DOUBLE SWING GATE
- SEE CIVIL PLANS
EXISTING CURB
PROPERTY LINE
4" DEPTH CRUSHED ROCK
W/WEED BARRIER FABRIC
COMPOUND AREA
- SEE CIVIL PLANS
EXISTING
RESIDENTIAL
NAYEL-CHRISTY INVESTMENTS LLC
PARCEL ID:  21460020
16' UTILITY EASEMENT
8' TELEPHONE
EASEMENT
EXISTING POWER
POLE (TYP.)
EXISTING O.H.E. (TYP.)
R.O.W. IS LIMIT OF WORK
ERILLIAM LLC
PARCEL ID:  21460018
VICINITY MAP
SITE
E GREENWAY RD
E NISBET RD
E SUNNYSIDE LN
E GREENWAY LN
N 32ND ST
N 33RD PL
TRANSFORMER MEET POINT
WITH POWER COMPANY
1' V.N.A.E.
33' X 33' S.V.T.
10' X 20' S.V.T.
16' COMMON DRIVEWAY
08/01/2025
PHO-4-25--Z-47-87-1(3)
Proposed Conceptual Landscape Plan
Hearing Date: September 17, 2025

EXHIBIT K

514 7
8 " 42'10
436" 36'4"
SUPPLIED AND
INSTALLED BY OTHERS
2"
7"
( 4 ")
8 3
4" NIPPLE IN 5" PVC
FIELD WORK
EXTERIOR LED LIGHT
831-02032
3070 DOOR
(20 34 ")
(104 1
8 ")
(110 1
8 ")
46 4 "
1
40"
TYP.
26"
21"
21"
16 4 "
1
CAST-IN J.B. FOR
CARD READER
BY OTHERS
EXTERIOR STROBE
FIELD WORK
849-01251
FIELD WORK
ENCLOSURE
EXTERIOR LIGHT
FIELDWORK
831-01999
2"
7
8 "
6"
102"
432" 36'0"
ELEVATION, EXTERNAL, WALL-A
NOTES:
1.REFER SHEET 1-3 FOR BUILDING NOTES.
C
HALF NO.2
B
HALF NO.1
A
ELEVATION KEY
REV. BY
DATE
REVISION
APP.
D
THESE PLANS ARE THE
CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY
AND TRADE SECRETS OF
FIBREBOND CORPORATION.
ANY USE OF THESE
DRAWINGS OR THE
INFORMATION CONTAINED
HEREIN FOR ANY REASON
OTHER THAN AS EXPRESSLY
AUTHORIZED BY FIBREBOND
CORPORATION IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. THESE
DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN
DISTRIBUTED WITH THE
UNDERSTANDING THAT
ANYONE RECEIVING OR
OTHERWISE OBTAINING
POSSESSION OF THEM WILL
BE EXPRESSLY NOTIFIED OF
THEIR CONFIDENTIAL NATURE
1300 DAVENPORT DRIVE, MINDEN, LA 71055
METRO FIBERNET, LLC
ph. (800) 824-2614 www.fibrebond.com
ISSUED FOR:
24' - 0" X 36' - 0" BUILDING
DRN.
BY:
CHK.
GD
BY: DL
ELEVATION, EXTERNAL, WALL-A
APP.
DATE:
29-DEC-2021
DATE:
BY:
APP.
BY:
MG
DATE:
DATE:
*APPROVAL A.00*
APPROVALS IN PDM
DATABASE
THIRD ANGLE
PROJECTION
SCALE
1:48
SIZE DWG NO.:
B
D11511
SHEET NO:
2-2
CAST WALL HEIGHT
10'0" 120"
133" 11'1"
141" 11'9"
8'-47
8"
7'-41
4"
8'-87
8"
DATE
DESCRIPTION
SUBMITTALS
REV
SCALE:
SITE NAME:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGN ENG:
REVIEWED BY:
14
LWW
JDF
LWW
SHEET NAME:
SHELTER ELEVATIONS
NTS
SITE ADDRESS:
SHEET NUMBER:
3206 SUNNYSIDE LN
PHOENIX SHELTER
PERMITTING
A
2/18/25
08/01/2025
PHO-4-25--Z-47-87-1(3)
Proposed Conceptual Elevations
Hearing Date: September 17, 2025

REV. BY
DATE
REVISION
APP.
(312" 26'0" )
292" 24'4"
( 2 ")
1
2"
7"
MODLINE GAP
15"
4-10 TON HVAC
837-01356
SHIPPING SPLIT
DRIP STRIP
1290002 2X
2"
4-10 TON HVAC
837-01356
LB
HVAC#2
LA
LA
LAA
HVAC#1
(12 1
8 ") TYP.
6"
34"
BRACE HVAC PRIOR TO
SHIPPING BUILDING
143 4 "
3
11'11 "3
4
HALF NO.2
288" 24'0"
ELEVATION, EXTERNAL, WALL-B
NOTES:
1.REFER SHEET 1-3 FOR BUILDING NOTES.
C
HALF NO.2
B
HALF NO.1
A
ELEVATION KEY
D
THESE PLANS ARE THE
CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY
AND TRADE SECRETS OF
FIBREBOND CORPORATION.
ANY USE OF THESE
DRAWINGS OR THE
INFORMATION CONTAINED
HEREIN FOR ANY REASON
OTHER THAN AS EXPRESSLY
AUTHORIZED BY FIBREBOND
CORPORATION IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. THESE
DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN
DISTRIBUTED WITH THE
UNDERSTANDING THAT
ANYONE RECEIVING OR
OTHERWISE OBTAINING
POSSESSION OF THEM WILL
BE EXPRESSLY NOTIFIED OF
THEIR CONFIDENTIAL NATURE
1300 DAVENPORT DRIVE, MINDEN, LA 71055
ph. (800) 824-2614 www.fibrebond.com
ISSUED FOR:
METRO FIBERNET, LLC
24' - 0" X 36' - 0" BUILDING
ELEVATION, EXTERNAL, WALL-B
DRN.
BY:
CHK.
BY: DL
GD
DATE:
DATE:
29-DEC-2021
APP.
BY:
APP.
BY:
DATE:
MG
DATE:
*APPROVAL A.00*
APPROVALS IN PDM
DATABASE
THIRD ANGLE
PROJECTION
SCALE
1:32
SIZE DWG NO.:
B
D11511
SHEET NO:
2-3
143 3
4 " 11'11 4 "
3
HALF NO.1
34"
120" 10'0"
CAST WALL HEIGHT
133" 11'1"
141"
11'9"
DATE
DESCRIPTION
SUBMITTALS
REV
SCALE:
SITE NAME:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGN ENG:
REVIEWED BY:
14
LWW
JDF
LWW
SHEET NAME:
SHELTER ELEVATIONS
NTS
SITE ADDRESS:
SHEET NUMBER:
3206 SUNNYSIDE LN
PHOENIX SHELTER
PERMITTING
A
2/18/25
08/01/2025
PHO-4-25--Z-47-87-1(3)
Proposed Conceptual Elevations
Hearing Date: September 17, 2025

REV. BY
DATE
REVISION
APP.
514 7
8 " 42'10 8 "
7
436" 36'4"
SUPPLIED AND
2"
7"
FIELDWORK
EXTERIOR LED LIGHT
831-02032
26"
21"
40" TYP.
21"
6"
120"
432" 36'0"
ELEVATION, EXTERNAL, WALL-C
CAST-IN J.B. FOR
CARD READER
BY OTHERS
461
4
"
3070 DOOR
16 4 "
1
FIELD WORK
EXTERIOR STROBE
849-01251
4" NIPPLE IN 5" PVC
(20 34 ")
(8 3
4 ")
FIELDWORK
EXTERIOR LIGHT
831-01999
INSTALLED BY OTHERS
FIELD WORK
ENCLOSURE
2"
NOTES:
1.REFER SHEET 1-3 FOR BUILDING NOTES.
C
HALF NO.2
B
HALF NO.1
A
ELEVATION KEY
D
THESE PLANS ARE THE
CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY
AND TRADE SECRETS OF
FIBREBOND CORPORATION.
ANY USE OF THESE
DRAWINGS OR THE
INFORMATION CONTAINED
HEREIN FOR ANY REASON
OTHER THAN AS EXPRESSLY
AUTHORIZED BY FIBREBOND
CORPORATION IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. THESE
DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN
DISTRIBUTED WITH THE
UNDERSTANDING THAT
ANYONE RECEIVING OR
OTHERWISE OBTAINING
POSSESSION OF THEM WILL
BE EXPRESSLY NOTIFIED OF
THEIR CONFIDENTIAL NATURE
1300 DAVENPORT DRIVE, MINDEN, LA 71055
ph. (800) 824-2614 www.fibrebond.com
ISSUED FOR:
METRO FIBERNET, LLC
24' - 0" X 36' - 0" BUILDING
DRN.
CHK.
BY:
BY: DL
GD
ELEVATION, EXTERNAL, WALL-C
APP.
DATE:
DATE:
DATE:
29-DEC-2021
BY:
APP.
BY:
MG
DATE:
*APPROVAL A.00*
THIRD ANGLE
APPROVALS IN PDM
DATABASE
PROJECTION
SCALE
1:48
SIZE
B
SHEET NO:
2-4
DWG NO.:
D11511
120" 10'0"
CAST WALL HEIGHT
(104
1
8 ")
(110 8 ")
1
133" 11'1"
141" 11'9"
DATE
DESCRIPTION
SUBMITTALS
REV
SCALE:
SITE NAME:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGN ENG:
REVIEWED BY:
14
LWW
JDF
LWW
SHEET NAME:
SHELTER ELEVATIONS
NTS
SITE ADDRESS:
SHEET NUMBER:
3206 SUNNYSIDE LN
PHOENIX SHELTER
PERMITTING
A
2/18/25
08/01/2025
PHO-4-25--Z-47-87-1(3)
Proposed Conceptual Elevations
Hearing Date: September 17, 2025

(312"
292" 24'4"
26'0"
MODLINE GAP
2 ")
(
2"
7"
80"
1
SHIPPING SPLIT
15"
4-10 TON HVAC
837-01356
DRIP STRIP
1290002 2X
4-10 TON HVAC
837-01356
2"
)
826-00062
LB
LA
LA
86 8 "
1
HVAC#3
LAA
HVAC#4
(12 1
8 ") TYP.
6"
34"
822-13765
822-10365
827-00085
BRACE HVAC PRIOR TO
SHIPPING BUILDING
143 " 11'11 4 "
3
4
HALF NO.1
288" 24'0"
C
HALF NO.2
B
HALF NO.1
A
ELEVATION KEY
REV. BY
DATE
REVISION
APP.
D
THESE PLANS ARE THE
CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY
AND TRADE SECRETS OF
FIBREBOND CORPORATION.
ANY USE OF THESE
DRAWINGS OR THE
INFORMATION CONTAINED
HEREIN FOR ANY REASON
OTHER THAN AS EXPRESSLY
AUTHORIZED BY FIBREBOND
CORPORATION IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. THESE
DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN
DISTRIBUTED WITH THE
UNDERSTANDING THAT
ANYONE RECEIVING OR
OTHERWISE OBTAINING
POSSESSION OF THEM WILL
BE EXPRESSLY NOTIFIED OF
THEIR CONFIDENTIAL NATURE
1300 DAVENPORT DRIVE, MINDEN, LA 71055
ph. (800) 824-2614 www.fibrebond.com
ISSUED FOR:
METRO FIBERNET, LLC
24' - 0" X 36' - 0" BUILDING
ELEVATION, EXTERNAL, WALL-D
DRN.
BY:
CHK.
GD
BY: DL
DATE:
DATE:
29-DEC-2021
APP.
BY:
APP.
BY:
MG
DATE:
DATE:
*APPROVAL A.00*
APPROVALS IN PDM
DATABASE
THIRD ANGLE
PROJECTION
SCALE
1:32
SIZE DWG NO.:
B
D11511
SHEET NO:
2-5
ELEVATION, EXTERNAL, WALL-D
3
143 3
4 " 11'11 3
4
"
HALF NO.2
34"
CAST WALL HEIGHT
10'0" 120"
133" 11'1"
141" 11'9"
DATE
DESCRIPTION
SUBMITTALS
REV
SCALE:
SITE NAME:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGN ENG:
REVIEWED BY:
14
LWW
JDF
LWW
SHEET NAME:
SHELTER ELEVATIONS
NTS
SITE ADDRESS:
SHEET NUMBER:
3206 SUNNYSIDE LN
PHOENIX SHELTER
PERMITTING
A
2/18/25
08/01/2025
PHO-4-25--Z-47-87-1(3)
Proposed Conceptual Elevations
Hearing Date: September 17, 2025

EXHIBIT L

PHO-4-25--Z-47-87-1(3)
Stipulated Site Plan
Hearing Date: September 17, 2025

EXHIBIT M

PHO-4-25--Z-47-87-1(3)
Stipulated Elevations
Hearing Date: September 17, 2025

EXHIBIT N

Home From Home STR LLC​
 3311 E. Greenway Lane​
 Phoenix, AZ 85032 
September 14, 2025 
Mr. Byron Easton​
 Planning Hearing Officer-City of Phoenix​
 Development Services Department​
 200 W. Washington Street, 2nd Floor​
 Phoenix, AZ 85003 
Re: PHO-4-25--Z-47-87-1(3) for 3206 East Sunnyside Lane requesting to modify​
 stipulation #1 of the Zoning Case PHO-3-11--Z-47-87-1 regarding conformance to the​
 site plan date stamped April 16, 1999, and the elevations date stamped May 18, 1999. 
Dear Mr. Easton, 
As a long-time homeowner and active member of Sunnyside Acres, I am writing to express my 
deep concerns regarding the proposed Metronet facility at 3206 E. Sunnyside Lane. I own 
3216 and 3226 E. Sunnyside Lane, and my family and I care deeply about maintaining the 
safety, character, and livability of our neighborhood. 
Through the research of one of our neighbors, Erika Smith Royal, who is an active and trusted 
member of our community, it has been determined that there is no record of an amendment to 
the CCRs that allowed lots #18 and #19 to be changed from R1-14 to R-O Residential Office – 
Restricted Commercial. If there is proof of such a change, I ask that it be provided. Even if the 
zoning stands, the intent of R-O zoning is for low-impact uses with residential characteristics, 
which this proposal does not meet. 
The City of Phoenix Planning & Development Department’s R-O Zoning Guidelines outline three 
types of residential district uses: purely residential, a mix of residential and commercial, and 
residential office where office use predominates. The proposed Metronet unmanned fiber optic 
hub, also called the Metronet Shelter, does not fit within any of these categories. While Section 
620 of the Phoenix Municipal Code allows public utility buildings under a use permit, Metronet is 
a private utility, and this unmanned structure stretches the intended limits of the guidelines. Use 
permits are intended for special exceptions where the activity does not significantly increase 
pedestrian traffic, create odor, dust, gas, noise, vibration, heat, or glare beyond normal 
conditions, or contribute to neighborhood deterioration or loss of property value. In this case, the 
proposed shelter raises clear concerns on all of these points. 
This project will have a direct and immediate impact on my property at 3216 E. Sunnyside 
Lane, which is a licensed short-term rental (Home From Home Short Term Rental LLC, License 
#STR-2025-002486) and shares a wall with the proposed facility. My guests come expecting a 
safe, quiet, and welcoming environment. An unmanned utility structure so close to my property

risks creating noise, unsightly conditions, and potential security concerns. Guests may 
feel unsafe or uncomfortable, which could harm my reputation as a licensed short-term rental 
operator, reduce bookings, and negatively affect the income that helps maintain my properties. 
I am also concerned that this unmanned structure could reduce the value of both of my 
properties, as it sits directly adjacent to 3216 and 3226 E. Sunnyside Lane. Its presence could 
attract loitering or unhoused individuals, potentially reversing years of progress in controlling 
homelessness in the area. Additionally, even if the facility is safe, some guests may have 
concerns about 5G and fiber optic equipment nearby, which can influence their perception of 
safety and comfort.  
In particular, there can be a significant issue with high-speed fiber optic converters installed 
at the street or in homes, as they are not designed with low-EMI emissions in mind. 
According to an article from EMF Analysis (link) ,these converters and their power supplies can 
generate high amounts of wide-spectrum electromagnetic interference (EMI). In my 
opinion, this raises a physical concern to me and to our future tenants at 3226 E. 
Sunnyside Lane, making the immediate environment less desirable for residents and guests 
alike. (https://www.emfanalysis.com/fiber-optics-increasing-electrical-sensitivity/) 
Our neighborhood has worked for years to address homelessness and blight. Introducing a 
facility that is unattended and invites loitering threatens to reverse this progress. Trash and 
debris, as already seen at Lot #18 with Southwest Gas, accumulate quickly when structures are 
left unsupervised. My guests should not have to contend with these risks, nor should our 
neighbors. 
There are additional unanswered questions about long-term impacts. No environmental study 
has been conducted, no compliance with the City’s Climate Action Plan has been 
demonstrated, and no assurances have been given that fiber optic converters or towers 
will not be added at a later date. A facility like this belongs in an industrial setting, not 
directly adjacent to residential homes and a permitted short-term rental. With fiber lines 
being redesigned, this is a timely opportunity to place the hub in a location better suited for its 
commercial and operational needs. 
I respectfully ask that the City carefully consider the voices of local residents and property 
owners and protect the safety, comfort, and experience of residents and guests, as well as 
the integrity and value of our neighborhood. Sunnyside Acres is a community we love and 
actively care for, and we hope the City will help preserve the qualities that make it a safe and 
welcoming place for everyone.  
Thank you for your time, understanding, and attention to these concerns. 
Sincerely, 
Chinnaz & John Sayegh​
Home From Home STR LLC (602.790.8796)​
Cammari6571@gmail.com

*Additional Correspondence added: 11/4/2025