Attachment C - VPC Summary - PreserveHistoricPHX 2025.pdf

ATTACHMENT C 
PreserveHistoricPHX 2025: Historic Preservation Plan Update 
Village Planning Committee Summary Results 
 
Village 
Recommendation 
Date 
Recommendation 
Vote 
Ahwatukee 
Foothills 
6/23/25 
Approval with direction  
 
10-0 
Alhambra 
7/22/25 
No quorum 
- 
Camelback 
East 
6/3/25 
Approval with direction  
17-0 
Central City 
6/9/25 
Approval with direction  
 
8-0 
Deer Valley 
6/17/25 
Approval with direction  
 
10-0 
Desert View 
6/3/25 
Approval 
12-0 
Encanto 
6/2/25 
Approval with direction  
 
14-0 
Estrella 
6/17/25 
Approval with direction  
 
5-0 
Laveen 
6/9/25 
Approval with direction  
 
10-0 
Maryvale 
6/11/25 
Approval with direction  
 
13-0 
North 
Gateway 
6/12/25 
Approval with direction  
 
9-0 
North 
Mountain 
6/18/25 
Approval with direction  
 
9-0 
Paradise 
Valley 
6/2/25 
Approval 
14-0 
Rio Vista 
6/10/25 
Approval with direction  
 
5-0 
South 
Mountain 
7/8/25 
Approval with direction  
 
14-0

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
 
 
 
Date of VPC Meeting 
June 23, 2025 
Request 
Request to adopt the Historic Preservation Plan 
update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
VPC Recommendation 
Approval, per the staff recommendation, with 
direction 
VPC Vote 
10-0 
 
 
VPC DISCUSSION: 
 
One member of the public registered to speak on this item. 
 
STAFF PRESENTATION 
Helana Ruter, the City of Phoenix Historic Preservation Officer, provided a 
presentation regarding the draft Historic Preservation Plan update, highlighting the 
public outreach, the plan goals, and next steps, and asking the Committee to provide 
any final comments and make a formal recommendation. 
 
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE 
Committee Member Broberg asked about archeological resources in the village. 
Ms. Ruter replied with examples, including those found at South Mountain, noting 
that preservation of archeological resources is required by ordinance. 
 
Committee Member Blackman asked about the limits on development resulting from 
historic designation. Ms. Ruter replied that HP designation is a zoning overlay and 
requires that any exterior renovation must be reviewed by the Historic Preservation 
Office for design review. Ms. Blackman followed up with a question about windows. 
Ms. Ruter replied that windows only require review when the size is changed. 
 
Committee Member Jain asked if there will be changes to address the state 
legislation. Ms. Ruter replied that the City cannot supersede state law, and the task is 
to figure out how to allow the mandated density while adhering to the design review. 
 
Chair Gasparro asked about the incentives for historic preservation. Ms. Ruter noted 
standardized plans for ADUs and that the City is looking to make HP compatible 
ones, and highlighted the incentive program in downtown code and grant programs 
funded through the recently approved bond.

Ahwatukee Foothills Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary - June 23, 2025 
Historic Preservation Plan Update 
Page 2 of 3 
 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Committee Member Maloney asked how an HP designation starts. Ms. Ruter stated 
that it needs to be community driven because of Proposition 207, noting that the City 
wants at least 80% of property owners to sign waivers in order to consider HP 
designation and that the City is looking at an honorific designation to avoid the 
Proposition 207 concerns. 
 
Chair Gasparro asked about tax incentives. Ms. Ruter replied that non-income 
producing properties on the National Register qualify for a reduction in property taxes. 
 
Vice Chair Mager asked about the implications and enforcement of HP designation. 
Ms. Ruter replied that HP properties have a stay of demolition, but then a building 
can still be demolished, noting creative solutions are achieved such as a house 
downtown being moved in order to preserve it and allow development. 
 
Committee Member Barua commended the Historic Preservation Office and the 
vision they have looking to the past and to the future. 
 
Committee Member Fisher asked about the reason behind historic designation 
beyond simply looking at age, noting that a neighborhood of a certain age isn’t 
necessarily interesting. Ms. Ruter stated that age is only one component and that 50-
years is a standard benchmark used around the country, reviewing the details of the 
other two factors for determining designation, which are significance and integrity. Mr. 
Fisher noted that a 50-year time span today is not as significant as it was in the past 
and we should be looking for something unique or significant. 
 
Vice Chair Mager commented about looking at today’s development as creating the 
historic districts of the future. 
 
Committee Member Broberg stated that the City of Phoenix owns land that could be 
used for developments that are more unique, which could stand out in the future, 
particularly noting that land is being used to house the un-housed population. Ms. 
Blackman noted that it would require an architect who wanted to leave a legacy. 
 
PUBLIC COMMENTS 
Eric Gilmore introduced himself and spoke about concerns with the recently passed 
state legislation addressing missing middle housing, noting that it would significantly 
impact 22 historic neighborhoods within one mile of downtown and asking the VPC to 
vote to approve with direction to add an analysis of the impact of the legislation on 
historic neighborhoods. 
 
Committee Member Broberg asked about the purpose of the analysis. Mr. Gilmore 
stated we cannot change the state law, but there should be analysis done of the 
impact of it. Vice Chair Mager noted that it could be beneficial to at least put the 
impact on the record. Mr. Fisher asked if staff has a position on the suggested 
motion. Ms. Ruter stated that the City doesn’t have any concerns with adding the 
language to the plan, noting that they will be doing annual reporting as well.

Ahwatukee Foothills Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary - June 23, 2025 
Historic Preservation Plan Update 
Page 3 of 3 
 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
Chair Gasparro asked if the analysis would be done in-house. Ms. Ruter replied that 
it would likely be done in-house. 
 
Committee Member Jain asked if the Historic Preservation Office will be able to 
review permits for new homes built under this legislation. Ms. Ruter stated that there 
would still be a design review. 
 
Committee Member Strem asked about determining what meets the criteria for 
designation. Mr. Gilmore replied that it is an analysis of the history of a building while 
understanding the need for new housing. 
 
Chair Gasparro suggested looking at the original plats for any restrictions, which 
might be a practical solution to the issue. 
 
COMMITTEE DISCUSSION 
Committee Member Jain stated a concern with the proposed motion from Mr. 
Gilmore, noting the cost of doing the analysis. 
 
Committee Member Blackman stated that without the ability to control historic 
preservation, the historic areas will be lost. 
 
Committee Member Broberg stated that this could be something that happens in 
Ahwatukee in the future. 
 
MOTION 
Darin Fisher made a motion to recommend approval of the Historic Preservation 
Plan update, per the staff recommendation, with direction that staff amend the report 
to include an assessment and analysis of how the Missing Middle Housing Law 
(A.R.S. Section 9-462.13, HB 2721) will impact historic districts within one mile of 
Phoenix’s Central Business District. Toni Broberg seconded the motion. 
 
VOTE 
10-0; motion to recommend approval of the Historic Preservation Plan update, per the 
staff recommendation, with direction passed; Committee Members Barua, Blackman, 
Broberg, Fisher, Golden, Jain, Maloney, Strem, Mager, and Gasparro in favor. 
 
 
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:  
 
Staff has no comments.

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
 
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
 
 
Date of VPC Meeting 
June 3, 2025 
Request 
Request to adopt the Historic Preservation Plan update 
(PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
VPC Recommendation 
Approval, per the staff recommendation, with direction 
VPC Vote 
17-0 
 
 
VPC DISCUSSION: 
 
No members of the public registered to speak on this item. 
 
Helana Ruter, the City of Phoenix Historic Preservation Officer, provided a presentation 
regarding the draft Historic Preservation Plan update, highlighting the public outreach, 
the plan goals, and next steps, and asking the Committee to provide any final 
comments and make a formal recommendation. 
 
Committee Member Whitesell asked if the plan has language relative to the impact of 
state legislation on historic preservation, noting a concern with the House Bill to expand 
the boundaries of the Central Business District. Ms. Ruter stated that the City is aware 
of the issues and that the plan must be approved by the end of the year. 
 
MOTION: 
Committee Member Whitesell made a motion to recommend approval of the Historic 
Preservation Plan update, per the staff recommendation, with direction that 
considerations of the actions of the State Legislature be reflected in the report. 
Committee Member Williams seconded the motion. 
 
VOTE: 
17-0; motion to recommend approval of the Historic Preservation Plan update, per the 
staff recommendation, with direction passed; Committee Members Abbott, Augusta, 
Beckerleg Thraen, Eichelkraut, Garcia, Langmade, McClelland, Noel, Schmieder, 
Sharaby, Siegel, Swart, Todd, Whitesell, Williams, Paceley, and Fischbach in favor. 
 
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION: 
 
Staff has no comments.

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
  
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
 
 
Date of VPC Meeting 
June 9, 2025 
Request 
Request to adopt the Historic Preservation Plan 
update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
VPC Recommendation 
Approval, per the staff recommendation, with 
direction 
VPC Vote 
8-0 
 
 
VPC DISCUSSION: 
 
One member of the public registered to speak on this item and did not indicate support 
or opposition. 
 
STAFF PRESENTATION 
 
Helana Ruter, staff, provided a presentation regarding the Historic Preservation Plan 
Update. Ms. Ruter introduced the project timeline, described the plan’s five goals, 
described studies conducted on the impact and challenges of preservation, shared the 
results from a public survey, and explained that her team is coordinating with the City’s 
Archaeology Department. Ms. Ruter requested final comments from the Committee, 
asked for a recommendation of approval, and stated that the plan will be ultimately 
adopted by City Council. 
 
QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE 
 
Committee Member Jordan Greenman asked about mechanisms for historic 
preservation similar to those available for adaptive reuse and asked whether the 
Historic Preservation Office is exploring incentives beyond the existing framework. Ms. 
Ruter explained that the Downtown Code includes a sustainability bonus that may be 
applicable in certain situations, stated that her office is interested in expanding these 
types of tools, stated that rehabilitation grants are available, and expressed a goal to 
build stronger partnerships with the Office of Customer Advocacy. 
 
Committee Member Greenman asked if there are specific areas the Historic 
Preservation Office is targeting for designation. Ms. Ruter stated that there are no

Central City Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
June 9, 2025 
Page 2 of 3 
 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
geographic priority areas at this time and explained that the office is supportive of 
efforts such as the National Register nomination for Grand Avenue the Miracle Mile 
corridor. Ms. Ruter explained that staffing and funding resources were significantly 
reduced after the recession, stated that capacity is gradually returning, and explained 
that the office generally responds to community-initiated requests. 
 
Chair Cyndy Gaughan asked whether properties eligible for historic designation have 
a defined path to being listed and recommended that a timeline be established to guide 
those efforts. Ms. Ruter stated that her office develops a survey designation plan each 
year, explained that there has been a focus in recent cycles on postwar-era properties, 
and stated that updates are underway for the City’s ethnic heritage survey. Chair 
Gaughan asked whether community-based resources are being leveraged to support 
this work and help lighten the load. Ms. Ruter stated that this was a valuable comment. 
 
Vice Chair Darlene Martinez asked how information about the City’s rehabilitation 
programs is being shared with the public. Ms. Ruter responded that outreach is being 
coordinated with the City’s Public Information Office and explained that efforts include 
posts on social media, updates to the department webpage, neighborhood outreach, 
and the development of online tutorial content. Chair Gaughan stated that City Council 
offices distribute information regarding historic preservation programs through their 
regular email newsletters. 
 
Chair Gaughan asked about the proposal to extend the 30-day demolition hold. Ms. 
Ruter stated that the current policy applies to commercial properties over 50 years old 
that are either eligible for historic designation or located within areas covered by the 
Downtown Code and explained that the plan proposes increasing the hold period to 60 
days. 
 
PUBLIC COMMENT 
 
Opal Wagner introduced herself, stated that she serves on the Encanto Village 
Planning Committee (VPC), and explained that the Encanto VPC considered the plan 
at a recent meeting. Ms. Wagner explained the Encanto VPC voted to recommend 
approval with the condition that the plan includes an analysis of the impact of the 
Missing Middle Housing Bill. Ms. Wagner stated that the state legislation will allow 
multifamily housing on properties currently zoned for single-family use and will enable 
further subdivision of lots, expressed concern that the Bill will incentivize demolitions in 
historic neighborhoods, and explained that the Bill is not addressed in the draft Historic 
Preservation Plan.

Central City Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
June 9, 2025 
Page 3 of 3 
 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
STAFF RESPONSE 
 
Ms. Ruter thanked Ms. Wagner for her comments, stated that the Encanto Village has 
a large number of residential historic districts, stated that similar concerns have been 
raised in other villages, and confirmed that the impact of the Missing Middle Housing 
Bill on historic properties will be incorporated into the Historic Preservation Plan. 
 
FLOOR/PUBLIC DISCUSSION CLOSED: MOTION, DISCUSSION, AND VOTE 
 
Committee Member Edward Vargas asked for clarification on the specific concern. 
Ms. Ruter explained that under the new legislation the R1-6 zoning district would allow 
up to four dwelling units per lot, stated there are concerns that the Bill will encourage 
demolition of existing historic homes, and explained that there is a one-year demolition 
stay for properties with official historic designation. 
 
Committee Member Janey Pearl Starks asked whether the legislation limits the 
number of stories that can be built. Ms. Wagner stated that the Bill allows for a 
maximum height of two stories. 
 
Motion:  
Committee Member Zach Burns made a motion to recommend approval of the 
Historic Preservation Plan, per the staff recommendation, with direction that staff 
amend the Historic Preservation Plan to include an assessment and analysis of how 
the Missing Middle Housing Law (ARS Section 9-462.13, HB2721) will impact historic 
districts within one mile of Phoenix's Central Business District. Vice Chair Darlene 
Martinez seconded the motion.  
 
Vote: 
8-0, motion to recommend approval the Historic Preservation Plan, per the staff 
recommendation, with direction that staff amend the Historic Preservation Plan to 
include an assessment and analysis of how the Missing Middle Housing Law (ARS 
Section 9-462.13, HB2721) will impact historic districts within one mile of Phoenix's 
Central Business District passed, with Committee Members Ban, Burns, Greenman, 
Johnson, Starks, Vargas, Martinez, and Gaughan in favor. 
 
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION: 
 
None.

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
 
 
Date of VPC Meeting 
June 17, 2025 
Request 
Adoption of the Historic Preservation Plan update 
(PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
VPC Recommendation 
Approval, per the staff recommendation, with direction 
VPC Vote 
10-0 
 
 
VPC DISCUSSION: 
 
One member of the public registered to speak on this item. 
 
Staff Presentation: 
Kevin Weight, staff, gave a presentation regarding the update to the city’s Historic 
Preservation Plan. Mr. Weight stated that the city’s first comprehensive Historic 
Preservation Plan was adopted in 2015 and the current update was the result of a 
collaborative effort that began with two consultant studies in 2021 and 2024, both of 
which included focus groups and outreach, the results of which were incorporated into 
the plan update. Mr. Weight stated the plan update supports and expands upon the 
historic preservation goals outlined in the recently adopted general plan update, and 
details the public benefits of historic preservation, while providing a legal and 
historical background for preservation both nationally and in Phoenix. Mr. Weight 
stated that the plan update includes a timeline of historic preservation activities in 
Phoenix over the last 100+ years and outlines the functions of the City of Phoenix 
Historic Preservation Commission, Historic Preservation Office, and City Archaeology 
Office, as well as listing the city’s accomplishments since the adoption of the 2015 
plan. Mr. Weight added that the plan update includes five goals, those being to protect 
archaeological resources, protect historic resources, explore preservation incentives, 
develop community awareness, and promote partnerships. Mr. Weight summarized 
the timeline for approval stating that the Historic Preservation Office has been 
presenting to the various villages with the intent of seeking a recommendation from 
each village. Mr. Weight summarized the upcoming Historic Preservation Committee 
meeting, Planning Commission, City Council Sub-Committee meetings, and City 
Council formal sessions, with final approval to occur in October of this year and an 
effective date in January 2026. Mr. Weight asked for input from the Village Planning 
Committee and that the Committee recommend approval of the plan update.

Deer Valley Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
Page 2 of 5 
 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Questions from the Committee: 
Chair Gregory Freeman asked if there were any historic districts in the Deer Valley 
Village. Mr. Weight stated there were no historic districts but there are some 
individually eligible properties in addition to the Deer Valley Rock Art Center and 
some early 20th Century buildings. Mr. Weight stated it is a shifting 50-year mark and 
that more properties will surface over time. 
 
Committee Member Ricardo Romero asked about community engagement. Mr. 
Weight stated they had presented to the Historic Preservation Commission, which is 
a nine-member body appointed by the City Council. Mr. Weight stated that the Historic 
Preservation Commission has committed to being more active. Mr. Weight stated they 
have had a presence at certain activities and community events and have been 
working their way north into areas that have not had much activity in the past. Mr. 
Weight stated they have been working to establish partnerships with non-profit 
groups. 
 
Committee Member Trilese DiLeo asked about the criteria needed to receive 
Historic status. Mr. Weight stated that the city’s criteria mirrors that of the National 
Park Service and the State of Arizona, which requires the site to be at least 50 years 
old, with some exceptions, that the site be significant in terms of local, state or 
national history, and that the site retain its integrity with respect to location, materials, 
design, and workmanship. 
 
Committee Member Gerrald Adams asked about the presence of archeological 
sites. Mr. Weight stated that Historic Preservation and Archeology are separate 
entities within the city and that he is not a trained archeologist but that there are 
locations in the area such as the Deer Valley Rock Art Center. Mr. Weight stated 
there are state laws in place that protect archeological sites and that if a site is known 
to have archeological significance, then monitoring of the site would be required 
during the development of the site to allow documentation of any findings. Mr. Weight 
stated that such findings do not necessarily stop the development of a site but allow 
the site to be managed in a way that is sensitive to the archeological resources, so 
they are not lost. Mr. Weight stated that some sites might be so significant that they 
are listed on the Register, which does protect the site. Mr. Weight stated that if human 
remains are found, the tribes are notified and the remains preserved per tribal 
customs. Committee Member Adams asked about time limits associated with the 
findings of human remains. Mr. Weight referenced a project at Tovrea Castle where a 
human body was discovered during clearing activities related to the caretaker’s 
quarters and police were called in to investigate a crime. 
 
Public Comments: 
Tom Doescher identified himself as a member of the Encanto Village Planning 
Committee. Mr. Doescher stated that a couple weeks prior, the Encanto Village 
Planning Committee voted to approve the proposed Historic Preservation Plan update 
with direction to require the plan to include an analysis of the effects the Missing 
Middle Housing Bill would have on Historic Preservation efforts within the City of

Deer Valley Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
Page 3 of 5 
 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Phoenix. Mr. Doescher stated that the bill was passed in late 2024 with an effective 
date of January 1st, 2026 and that the bill affects cities with greater than 75,000 
population, allowing duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes up to two stories in height in 
and within one-mile of the city’s Central Business District. Mr. Doescher stated that 22 
of the 33 historic districts in Phoenix are located within that one-mile border. Mr. 
Doescher stated that the bill will have devastating effects on historic neighborhoods. 
Mr. Doescher stated that he resided in the Willo District, which received historic status 
in 1986 under a conservation plan, prior to the Historic Preservation Ordinance having 
taken effect. Mr. Doescher stated that the first house in the district was constructed in 
1913. Mr. Doescher stated that under the new Bill, a developer could buy a property, 
let it sit for a year, then tear it down to build affordable housing. Mr. Doescher stated 
that the Willo District was designated largely as single-family homes, with two 
multifamily exceptions. Mr. Doescher reiterated that the bill will have a devastating 
effect on the neighborhood and will not provide affordable housing. Mr. Doescher 
gave two examples of projects in the area that were constructed in a manner that was 
out of character with the neighborhood. Mr. Doescher stated that the Encanto Village 
Planning Committee has received a consensus among the other Village Planning 
Committees to give direction that the plan update include an analysis of the effects 
that House Bill 2721 would have on historic neighborhoods in Phoenix. Mr. Doescher 
stated that other cities within the state that have historic neighborhoods will also be 
affected by the bill and that the City of Tucson prepared a 77-page analysis on the 
subject. Mr. Doescher stated that the Willo District tried to get an amendment to the 
bill, but it was too late in the legislative session and that they would seek changes to 
the bill during the next legislative session. Mr. Doescher reiterated his request to the 
Village Planning Committee. 
 
Committee Member James Sutphen asked what can be done if the law has already 
been passed. Mr. Doescher stated that the Committee could give direction to staff to 
look at what can be done to exempt historic districts from this law. Mr. Doescher 
stated that he understands that this might be perceived as being against affordable 
housing but also stated that the Willo District and others were supportive of the law 
concerning accessory dwelling units, citing examples of garage conversions that had 
taken place over time. Mr. Doescher stated they were not opposed to affordable 
housing but did not believe that House Bill 2721 will have any effect on a statewide 
housing shortage when applied to historic neighborhoods. Mr. Doescher stated that 
the city must have an ordinance adopted by January 1, 2026. 
 
Committee Member Sandra Hoffman asked if they had looked at placing deed 
restrictions on the properties. Mr. Doescher stated that they all have restrictions and 
are looking at Proposition 207. 
 
Staff Response: 
Mr. Weight stated that the other Village Planning Committees were in agreement that 
the effects of House Bill 2721 present a challenge that needs to be addressed in the 
plan update, and that staff is in support. Mr. Weight stated that the process of 
updating the plan began prior to the passage of House Bill 2721 and that a Text

Deer Valley Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
Page 4 of 5 
 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Amendment to implement that bill is in progress. Mr. Weight stated that other 
municipalities such as Tucson have already begun working on the issue. 
 
Discussion: 
Committee Member Trilese DiLeo asked who wrote the Missing Middle Housing Bill. 
Chair Freeman stated that it was the State Legislature that wrote the bill. Committee 
Member DiLeo asked how a building could get torn down and if there would be any 
sort of rezoning process. Mr. Weight stated that if the property is listed, the Historic 
Preservation Office can delay the demolition of the building for a period of one year, 
during which time alternatives to the demolition of the building would be identified. Mr. 
Weight stated that under the current ordinance, the owner can propose a suitable 
replacement, which would be evaluated based on its density and character; however, 
under the new law, that density could be dramatically different than the adjacent 
neighborhood. Committee Member Dileo asked for clarification that if any home was 
to be destroyed by fire, could the owner come back with a fourplex as opposed to like-
for-like as currently written in the ordinance. Mr. Weight clarified that would be the 
case within the Central Business District and within a one-mile radius of that district. 
Mr. Weight stated that it does not currently affect the Deer Valley Village but it does 
affect about two-thirds of the historic districts, primary those that are south of Thomas 
Road. 
 
Committee Member Adams asked about rezoning the property. Mr. Kuhfuss, staff, 
stated that any property owner would have the right to file a rezoning application but 
that granting the rezoning request is not a foregone conclusion. Chair Freeman 
summarized that the new law prevents the city from stopping this type of development 
from occurring within this area. Committee Member DiLeo asked for confirmation of 
the maximum number of units. Mr. Weight stated the maximum number of units is 
four. 
 
Mr. Weight stated that other recent changes to state law such as accessory dwelling 
units have been implemented fairly well within the historic districts, but that House Bill 
2721 allows the replacement of relatively small buildings with much more density. Mr. 
Weight stated that he would appreciate the Committee’s support and that if the 
Committee wanted to take into account Mr. Doescher’s request to include an analysis 
on the effects of House Bill 2721, they would gladly comply. 
 
MOTION: 
Committee Member Trilese DiLeo motioned to recommend approval of the Historic 
Preservation Plan update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025), per the staff recommendation, 
with direction for staff to include an analysis of the effects of House Bill 2721 in the 
plan update. Committee Member Ricardo Romero seconded the motion. 
 
Additional Discussion: 
 
Committee Member Hoffman stated that she wanted the analysis to include both the 
positive and negative aspects of House Bill 2721.

Deer Valley Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
Page 5 of 5 
 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
VOTE: 
10-0, motion to recommend approval of the Historic Preservation Plan update 
(PreserveHistoricPHX 2025), per the staff recommendation, with direction for staff to 
include an analysis of the effects of House Bill 2721 in the plan update passes with 
Committee Members Adams, Clark, Davenport, DiLeo, Herber, Hoffman, Hoover, 
Romero, Sutphen and Freeman in favor and none opposed. 
 
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION: 
 
None.

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
 
 
 
 
Date of VPC Meeting 
June 3, 2025 
Request 
Request to adopt the Historic Preservation Plan update 
(PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
VPC Recommendation 
Approval, per the staff recommendation 
VPC Vote 
12-0 
 
 
VPC DISCUSSION: 
 
Committee Member Michelle Santoro returned, bringing the quorum to 12 members. 
 
No members of the public registered to speak on this item. 
 
Staff Presentation: 
Kevin Weight, with the City of Phoenix Historic Preservation Office, introduced himself 
and provided an overview of the Historic Preservation Plan update 
(PreserveHistoricPHX 2025). Mr. Weight discussed what the update includes and its 
collaborative effort. Mr. Weight shared the goals and the vision statement of the 
PreserveHistoricPHX 2025 plan. Mr. Weight concluded with the public hearing schedule 
and stated that staff recommends the Village Planning Committee provide any final 
comments and take action to recommend formal City Council approval of the plan.  
 
Questions from Committee: 
None. 
 
Public Comments: 
None. 
 
Staff Response: 
None. 
 
Discussion: 
Chair Steven Bowser stated that Phoenix is in its infancy of historic preservation. Chair 
Bowser complemented the picture on the cover of the PreserveHistoricPHX 2025 plan 
of a historic building on Central Avenue and Osborn Road.

Desert View Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
Page 2 of 2 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Committee Member George Birchby concurred.  
 
Committee Member Reginald Younger asked who the Arizona Veterans Memorial 
Coliseum is owned by. Mr. Weight responded that it is owned by the State and is part 
of the Arizona State Fairgrounds. Mr. Weight added that they have been working with 
the Arizona State Historic Preservation Office to encourage the Fairgrounds to preserve 
it. Mr. Weight stated that they have been somewhat non-committal, but they have not 
demolished it, which is good. Mr. Weight stated that it is on their list of significant 
historic properties for the post-World War II era. 
 
Chair Bowser stated that there are interesting resources available about historic 
properties and historic preservation.   
 
MOTION:  
Committee Member Gary Kirkilas made a motion to recommend approval of the 
Historic Preservation Plan update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025), per the staff 
recommendation. Committee Member Jason Israel seconded the motion. 
 
VOTE:  
12-0; the motion to recommend approval of the Historic Preservation Plan update 
(PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) per the staff recommendation passes with Committee 
Members Barto, Birchby, Carlucci, Israel, Kirkilas, Kollar, Nowell, Reynolds, Santoro, 
Younger, Lagrave and Bowser in favor. 
 
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION: 
 
Staff has no comments.

Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
 
Date of VPC Meeting 
June 2, 2025 
Request  
Adoption of the Historic Preservation Plan update 
(PreserveHIstoricPHX 2025) 
VPC Recommendation 
Approval, per staff recommendation, with direction 
VPC Vote 
14-0 
VPC DISCUSSION: 
One member of the public registered to speak on this item in opposition. 
STAFF PRESENTATION: 
 
Helana Ruter, Historic Preservation Officer for the City of Phoenix, provided an 
overview of the Preserve Phoenix 2025 Plan and its current progress and noted that this 
is the City’s first comprehensive, citywide historic preservation plan, which was originally 
adopted by the Phoenix City Council in 2016. Ms. Ruter stated that the planning 
process began with a consultant study which included focus groups and identified both 
challenges and opportunities in historic preservation. Mr. Ruter stated with this 
foundation, staff initiated a public engagement process to refine and prioritize 
preservation goals and strategies. Ms. Ruter said that Preserve Phoenix 2025 is a 
supplement to the City’s General Plan and supports its vision and core values by 
highlighting the role of historic preservation and heritage resources in shaping Phoenix’s 
future. Ms. Ruter stated the updated plan builds on the previous 2015 efforts and 
considers emerging tools, policies, and actions to address current needs. Ms. Ruter 
acknowledged that the process has evolved over the last 18 months, especially in 
response to recent state legislation focused on housing and new laws have introduced 
challenges by limiting local zoning and design review authority, which affects how 
Phoenix can enforce overlays and guidelines that protect the character of historic 
properties and neighborhoods. Ms. Ruter stated that language addressing these 
challenges will be included in the updated draft plan and the plan includes updated tools 
and policy recommendations that will require extensive public engagement to address

Encanto Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
Page 2 of 6 
 
evolving issues. Ms. Ruter stated the importance of balancing growth with the 
preservation of Phoenix’s unique historic character and that not everything can be 
preserved, and the city must be strategic about what and how it preserves. Ms. Ruter 
stated the Historic Preservation Commission is a nine-member advisory body that will 
review the progress during its annual work session in August and in that session, it will 
help assess achievements, identify gaps, and plan future actions. Ms. Ruter stated the 
city’s continued commitment to protecting historic resources within the constraints of 
new legislative limitations and that the final draft of the plan will reflect public comments 
and, upon completion, will be presented to the Phoenix City Council. Ms. Ruter stated 
once adopted, the updated plan will not only guide staff efforts but also serve to elevate 
public awareness and reaffirm the city's dedication to historic preservation. 
 
QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE: 
 
Committee Member Warnicke stated that they understood federal funding for the 
State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) may be ending, and it was unclear what 
alternative funding options might exist for the SHPO. Committee Member Warnicke 
asked how the SHPO’s inability to operate effectively would impact the City’s ability to 
protect historic resources and fulfill the objectives of the Preserve Phoenix 2025 plan. 
Ms. Ruter responded that while the City’s Historic Preservation Program is somewhat 
insulated due to being city funded, the city is still facing broader budget challenges. Ms. 
Ruter stated that the city does not directly receive federal funds for its preservation 
program, but it does regularly consult with the SHPO and noted that grants for privately 
owned historic properties often flow through the SHPO and they are crucial in the 
federal compliance process. Ms. Ruter said if the SHPO were unable to operate, all 
required consultations would have to go directly to the Advisory Council on Historic 
Preservation, creating delays and complications. Ms. Ruter stated that the city’s 
Government Affairs Office is aware of the issue and is working to advocate for the 
continuation of SHPO funding.  
 
Committee Member Wagner thanked Ms. Ruter for the presentation and asked 
whether any changes had been made to the draft plan since the previous presentation 
in April and if it remained the same. Ms. Ruter responded that there had been some 
updates, particularly related to how the plan addresses legal and policy challenges 
stemming from new state legislation. Ms. Ruter stated that she has been working 
closely with the City’s Law Department to carefully craft language that explains these 
challenges, especially those posed by the missing middle housing law without drawing 
unwanted attention or concern from the legislature. Ms. Ruter explained that while the 
city aims to continue its current design review processes, there are specific provisions 
in the new law, such as limitations on restricting building heights to two stories, that 
require careful legal interpretation, and these considerations are still being refined 
for inclusion in the final draft of the plan.

Encanto Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
Page 3 of 6 
 
 
Committee Member Kleinman asked if the draft version is currently available is 
intended to be the final version presented for adoption, or if a more complete version 
will be developed. Committee Member Kleinman expressed concern that, while a draft 
had been made available, it may not yet reflect all relevant updates, particularly given 
recent developments, and asked for clarification on the timing for a finalized version. 
Ms. Ruter responded that a draft version of the plan has been available since April and 
that it included a link for public review and comment and noted that beyond recent 
updates related to state legislation, no significant additional comments had been 
received to date. Ms. Ruter stated that she is actively working on incorporating further 
comments as they are submitted by Village Planning Committees. Ms. Ruter stated the 
Planning Commission will receive the plan as an information item this month in June, 
and it is scheduled to return in August for a formal recommendation and the goal is to 
compile all feedback into a final draft by then. 
 
Committee Member Wagner asked why a recommendation was being requested at 
this stage when key information especially regarding the impact of recent state 
legislation had not yet been fully incorporated. Committee Member Wagner questioned 
asked if there was a compelling reason to move the plan forward now rather than 
delaying it until all outstanding issues could be addressed and if there was a specific 
funding-related deadline or another reason for moving forward. Joshua Bednarek, 
Director of the Planning and Development Department, responded that staff would 
welcome a recommendation from the committee, including direction to address state 
legislation as part of that recommendation. Mr. Bednarek stated that due to the political 
sensitivity surrounding recent laws passed by the state legislature, staff have been 
advised to proceed cautiously in how that language will be incorporated. Mr. Bednarek 
stated that while the legislation affects only a small portion of the plan, the overall 
significance of Preserve Phoenix 2025 lies in its reaffirmation of the city’s and the 
community’s commitment to historic preservation. Mr. Bednarek encouraged the 
committee to make a recommendation on the plan while also providing guidance on 
how to address legislative challenges in the final draft. 
 
Committee Member Kleinman asked for clarification, inquiring whether staff was 
requesting the committee to submit language that would be legally binding, or whether 
this would be more of a policy recommendation. Mr. Bednarek responded that the 
committee could choose to recommend approval of the plan along with direction to staff 
to incorporate language addressing the challenges posed by recent state legislation. Mr. 
Bednarek stated that this would not be legally binding but would serve as policy 
guidance and that such a recommendation would help emphasize the importance of the 
issue as the City Council considers the plan. 
 
Committee Member Perez asked whether previous public feedback submitted prior to 
the most recent legislative changes had been incorporated into the draft. Committee

Encanto Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
Page 4 of 6 
 
Member Perez expressed concern that while the committee was being asked to 
comment on the new legislative language, it was unclear whether earlier feedback had 
already been addressed and asked how the committee could confirm that their prior 
input had been meaningfully considered. Mr. Bednarek responded that in addition to 
incorporating forthcoming comments on state legislative language, any feedback 
already submitted apart from the new legal concerns has been reviewed. Mr. Bednarek 
encouraged committee members to notify staff if there are any previously submitted 
comments that appear to be missing from the updated draft. Mr. Bednarek emphasized 
that comments about the legal and practical impacts of state legislation are being 
addressed in collaboration with the Law Department and will be reflected in future 
revisions. 
 
Committee Member Wagner stated that the only comments previously provided 
appeared to be focused on the missing middle housing legislation. Mr. Bednarek 
confirmed that those legal concerns have been received and that staff are working with 
the City’s Law Department to find appropriate language to incorporate into the plan. Mr. 
Bednarek invited any additional input and reassured the committee that the issue is 
being taken seriously. 
 
Committee Member George asked what the overall expectation was for the committee 
in relation to the proposed plan. Mr. Bednarek responded that it is important to support 
the goals and strategies outlined in the plan and that staff recommends forwarding a 
recommendation of approval to the City Council, along with any additional direction the 
committee may wish to provide, especially regarding recent state legislation. 
 
Committee Member Procaccini asked whether property taxes are addressed in the 
proposed plan. Mr. Bednarek responded that he did not believe the plan addresses 
property taxes and could not speak with certainty on whether such provisions were 
included in any associated legislation. 
 
PUBLIC COMMENT: 
 
Mr. Eric Gilmore introduced himself as a resident of a historic neighborhood and 
addressed the committee, expressing concern about the state legislation and the status 
of the Historic Phoenix Plan. Mr. Gilmore noted that while the plan includes technical 
details, it could benefit from additional emphasis on the cultural and demographic 
aspects of historic preservation. Mr. Gilmore recommended incorporating more data on 
demographics such as older adults, youth, and marginalized communities and 
emphasized the importance of preserving the city's cultural fabric. Mr. Gilmore also 
referenced prior reporting and urged staff to ensure that findings from earlier studies are 
adequately reflected in the updated plan. 
 
Committee Member Wagner stated that there are remaining comments and questions, 
noting that while the legal issues had not been discussed in detail, it was important to

Encanto Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
Page 5 of 6 
 
clarify that under the new legislation, developers could potentially demolish existing 
historic homes on single-family lots and construct multi-family units of up to four 
dwellings. Committee Member Wagner asked whether this interpretation was accurate, 
emphasizing its potential to significantly alter the character of historic neighborhoods. 
Mr. Bednarek responded that staff is preparing a text amendment to bring the City into 
compliance with the newly enacted state law. Mr. Bednarek cautioned the committee 
against engaging in detailed discussion on the forthcoming amendment, as it would 
return to the committee as a formal agenda item and asked committee members to 
submit questions in advance to help facilitate a productive discussion when the text 
amendment is presented. Mr. Bednarek reiterated that the text amendment and the 
historic preservation plan are separate items, though related. Committee Member 
Wagner acknowledged the clarification but stated that the text amendment, the state 
law, and the preservation plan are inherently linked due to their shared impact on 
historic districts. Committee Member Wagner reiterated concern about moving forward 
before fully addressing these issues. 
 
Committee Member Doescher commented that the committee was being asked to 
support the preservation plan while significant concerns remained unresolved and that 
the request for approval without complete information felt premature. Mr. Bednarek 
responded that the preservation plan is a policy document and does not carry the legal 
authority to modify or enforce state legislation. Mr. Bednarek clarified that while there is 
a connection between the preservation plan and the state mandated text amendment, 
they are distinct in function and the text amendment will be developed and adopted 
separately to meet the January 1, 2026 compliance deadline set by the state. Mr. 
Bednarek stated the preservation plan is intended to guide the city’s long-term 
preservation efforts but does not have regulatory power over zoning or development 
entitlements. 
 
Vice Chair Matthews closed the discussion and called for a motion. 
 
STAFF RESPONSE: 
 
 
None. 
 
FLOOR/PUBLIC DISCUSSION CLOSED: MOTION, DISCUSSION, AND VOTE: 
 
MOTION: 
Committee Member Wagner made a motion to recommend approval of the Preserve 
Phoenix 2025 Historic Preservation Plan Update, per the staff recommendation, with 
direction: 
 
Motion to approve the Preserve Historic Phoenix 2025 Historic Preservation Plan 
Update to include an assessment and analysis of how the Missing Middle Law ARS

Encanto Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
Page 6 of 6 
 
(Arizona Revised Statues) §9-462.13/HB (House Bill) 2721 will impact historic districts 
with one mile of Phoenix’s Central Business District.  
 
Committee Member G.G. George seconded the motion. 
 
VOTE: 
14-0, motion to recommend approval of the Preserve Phoenix 2025 Historic 
Preservation Plan Update, per the staff recommendation, with direction passes with 
Committee Members Cardenas, Doescher, Garcia, George, Kleinman, Mahrle, Perez, 
Picos, Procaccini, Schiller, Tedhams, Wagner, Warnicke, and Matthews in favor. 
 
Committee Member Warnicke commented that the state has become the biggest 
single threat to the city’s neighborhoods. 
 
Committee Member Wagner stated that the legislation poses a clear threat to historic 
preservation and should be prioritized in the plan’s list of identified challenges. 
 
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION: 
 
None.

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
 
 
Date of VPC Meeting 
June 17, 2025 
Request 
Adoption of the Historic Preservation Plan update 
(PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
VPC Recommendation 
Approval, per the staff recommendation, with direction 
VPC Vote 
5-0 
 
VPC DISCUSSION: 
 
Two members of the public registered to speak on this item.  
 
Staff Presentation:  
Helana Ruter, with the City of Phoenix Historic Preservation Office, provided an overview 
of the Historic Preservation Plan update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025), noting that the plan 
will set the framework for historic preservation in Phoenix for the next 10 years. Ms. Ruter 
stated that the plan is an update to the 2015 plan. Ms. Ruter discussed what the 
PreserveHistoricPHX 2025 plan includes and the five goal areas of the plan. Ms. Ruter 
concluded with the public hearing timeline and stated that staff recommend that the Village 
Planning Committee provide any final comments and take action to recommend formal 
City Council approval of the plan 
 
Questions from the Committee: 
Kristine Morris asked if only government buildings or residential buildings could be listed 
as historic. Ms. Ruter stated that a historic preservation overlay is not limited to 
government buildings or residential buildings and noted examples such as grain silos. Ms. 
Ruter noted that the recent bond allowed people to apply and encouraged a diversity of 
buildings and structures. Ms. Morris asked for more information regarding identifying 
historic properties because she was the superintendent of a school that was currently 
restoring a schoolhouse from the 1920’s. Ms. Ruter noted that there were land surveys 
from the 1980’s through the early 2000’s but that that stopped during the recession. Ms. 
Ruter stated that with this updated plan, there is a larger initiative to start surveying 
properties again. Ms. Ruter requested Committee Member Morris to follow up with her 
regarding the schoolhouse.  
 
Chair Parris Wallace stated that numerous of these historic neighborhoods consisted of 
the working class. Chair Wallace asked how the update would address gentrification. Ms. 
Ruter stated that the way properties are identified as historic was by rezoning the site to 
include the Historic Preservation Overlay in the zoning designation. Ms. Ruter added that 
that designation would have to go through the public hearing process and be approved by

Estrella Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
June 17, 2025 
Page 2 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
the City Council. Ms. Ruter stated that there is a certain classification that does not require 
rezoning the property. Ms. Ruter added that this would give individual properties the 
recognition of historic designation without it being regulatory. Ms. Ruter noted that a 
historic preservation overlay doesn’t limit development, if the property meets all the 
requirements. Ms. Ruter provided some examples like keeping the building façade.  
 
Chair Wallace asked how the update would impact future development or redevelopment. 
Ms. Ruter stated that if a property was over 50 years old, then it is put on hold for 30 days 
to allow the Historic Preservation Office to analyze the property and possibly save it from 
being torn down. Ms. Ruter added that some property owners do not want the historic 
designation on their property but that their department requests small features to tie the 
property to the past.  
 
Vice Chair Lisa Perez remembered the Circles Records and Tapes store that faced a lot 
of backlash when it was demolished. Vice Chair Perez stated that Phoenix does not have 
a deep history. Chair Perez mentioned the historic building on 3rd Street and Osborn 
which was able to restore the façade, but the building was used for a different use.  
 
Ms. Ruter stated that with the update, she hoped that there would be more initiatives such 
as grants to assist these developments and improvements. Vice Chair Perez mentioned 
the rezone case that consisted of a historic laundromat and how there were a wide range 
of opinions.  
 
Ms. Morris asked why historic properties were not included in the General Plan Update 
discussions. Vice Chair Perez noted that the General Plan Land Use Map focused on 
land use and not necessarily the historic property designation.  
 
Ms. Morris asked how they provide feedback regarding the update. Ms. Ruter noted that 
they were seeking a recommendation from the committee but that she would be happy to 
discuss any comments and comments can still be provided now or via email.  
 
Marcus Ceniceros asked for more information regarding the amtrack, and the old train 
station located in downtown Phoenix. Ms. Ruter stated that that property was owned by a 
private entity but that it was both on the National and Phoenix Historic Registry.  
 
Public Comment:  
Opal Wagner stated that she was on the Encanto Village Planning Committee and noted 
that she lived in the oldest historic districts in the city. Ms. Wagner noted that the Encanto 
committee has requested the Historic Preservation Office to amend the plan to address 
the missing middle housing. Ms. Wagner voiced her concern on how the state level 
initiatives could affect over 22 different neighborhoods. Ms. Wagner noted that many of the 
houses located in these historic neighborhoods are one story and that the initiative could 
potentially cause a lot of demolition to allow for additional houses. Ms. Wagner requested 
the Estrella committee to include the same direction in their recommendation as the 
Encanto committee.

Estrella Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
June 17, 2025 
Page 3 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Aaron Montano noted that he was also on the Encanto Village Planning Committee and 
that he echoed and supported the comments and request presented by Opal Wagner. Mr. 
Montano agreed that Phoenix does not have many historic buildings and noted that these 
historic neighborhoods dated back to the 1930’s. Mr. Montano stated that he supported 
affordable housing but that the updated needed to be updated to address the missing 
middle housing.  
 
Committee Discussion/Motion/Vote:  
Vice Chair Perez noted that there was a collision that focused on the missing middle 
housing movement. Vice Chair Perez was skeptical that this approach would provide 
affordable housing. Vice Chair Perez thanked both members of the public for coming to 
the Estrella Village Planning Committee meeting to provide their comments. Vice Chair 
Perez noted that she was familiar with the level of engagement and passion by residents 
that live in these historic neighborhoods. Vice Chair Perez voiced her support to add the 
same direction as the other committees.  
 
Chair Wallace thanked the members of the public for their comments but noted that four 
houses would help serve the community more than one.  
 
Ms. Wagner noted that they were not opposed to additional or affordable housing but 
would like the updated plan to assess how it would affect historic neighborhoods.  
 
Motion:  
Vice Chair Lisa Perez motioned to recommend approval of the Historic Preservation 
Plan update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025), per the staff recommendation, with direction 
that staff amend the report to include an assessment and analysis of how the Middle 
Housing Law, ARS Section 9-426-13, House Bill 2721 will impact Phoenix historic 
districts. Kristine Morris seconded.  
 
Vote: 
5-0, motion to recommend approval of the Historic Preservation Plan update 
(PreserveHistoricPHX 2025), per the staff recommendation, with direction passed with 
Committee Members Ceniceros, Dominguez, Morris, Perez, and Wallace in favor. 
 
Staff Comments Regarding VPC Recommendation:  
 
None.

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
 
 
Date of VPC Meeting 
June 9, 2025 
Request 
Adoption of the Historic Preservation Plan update 
(PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
VPC Recommendation 
Approval, per the staff recommendation, with direction 
VPC Vote 
10-0 
 
VPC DISCUSSION: 
 
Three members of the public registered to speak on this item.  
 
Staff Presentation:  
Kevin Weight, with the City of Phoenix Historic Preservation Office, introduced himself 
and provided an overview of the Historic Preservation Plan update. Mr. Weight shared 
how to access the plan. Mr. Weight discussed what the update is for and the 
collaborative effort of the plan update. Mr. Weight shared what the plan update includes 
and the goals of the plan update. Mr. Weight concluded with the public hearing timeline 
and stated that staff recommends the Village Planning Committee provide any final 
comments and take action to recommend formal City Council approval. 
 
Questions from the Committee:  
None.  
 
Public Comment: 
Chair Stephanie Hurd asked Phil Hertel if he would like to speak since he submitted a 
speaker card. Phil Hertel noted that he did not need to speak.  
 
Dan Penton voiced his support for the preservation plan. Mr. Penton noted that one of 
the plan’s goals was identifying and protecting the neighborhood heritage concept. Mr. 
Penton stated that numerous properties in the Laveen village would meet the 40–50-
year criteria to be identified as a heritage neighborhood. Mr. Penton requested more 
historic preservation enforcements that would prevent historic properties from being 
neglected or demolished. Mr. Penton added that South Mountain Park should be 
designated as cultural property to further protect it from future development.  
 
Tom Doescher stated that he was there representing the Willo Historic Neighborhood. 
Mr. Doescher requested that the updated plan address the missing middle housing. Mr. 
Doescher stated that historic houses could be torn down and converted into four units, 
thus eliminating history. Mr. Doescher reiterated his request to add a recommendation 
to address missing middle housing in the updated plan.

Laveen Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
June 9, 2025 
Page 2 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Staff Response: 
Mr. Weight appreciated the support voiced by the members of the public and noted that 
they have discussed the request to include missing middle housing during the Encanto 
Village Planning Committee meeting. Mr. Weight added that the committee was 
supportive of the direction and approved the updated plan. Mr. Weight noted that this 
would not affect Laveen but understood the community’s request to preserve single-
family houses. Mr. Weight stated that he would not oppose the Laveen committee’s 
decision if they wanted to add direction to address missing middle housing.  
 
Committee Discussion/Motion/Vote:  
None. 
 
Motion:  
Kristi McCann motioned to recommend approval of the Historic Preservation Plan 
update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025), per the staff recommendation, with direction that 
staff amend the report to include an assessment and analysis of how the Middle 
Housing Law, ARS Section 9-426-13, House Bill 2721 will impact Phoenix historic 
districts. Mixen Rubio-Raffin seconded.  
 
Vote: 
10-0, motion to recommend approval of the Historic Preservation Plan update 
(PreserveHistoricPHX 2025), per the staff recommendation, with direction passed with 
Committee Members Darby, McCann, Nasser-Taylor, Ortega, Perrera, Rouse, Rubio-
Raffin, Serrette, Barraza, Jensen, and Hurd in favor.  
 
Staff Comments Regarding VPC Recommendation:  
 
None.

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
 
 
 
Date of VPC Meeting 
June 11, 2025 
Request 
Request to adopt the Historic Preservation Plan 
update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
VPC Recommendation 
Approval, per the staff recommendation, with 
direction 
VPC Vote 
13-0 
 
VPC DISCUSSION: 
 
Committee Member Lupita Galaviz arrived during this item bringing the quorum 
thirteen. 
 
One member of the public registered to speak on this item. 
 
Helana Ruter, City of Phoenix Historic Preservation Officer, indicated that the 
PreserveHistoricPHX 2025 plan is an update to the first historic preservation 
plan adopted by the City of Phoenix ten years ago. Ms. Ruter noted a firm and 
focus group were employed to provide recommendations which kicked off a 
public engagement process. Ms. Ruter said the majority of the historic districts 
are on the periphery of downtown. Ms. Ruter stated there was an effort at the 
state level with legislation trying to limit municipal design review and zoning to 
keep buildings more affordable. 
 
Ms. Ruter added that coming later in the Fall to the Village Planning Committees 
is a text amendment related to the missing middle housing. Ms. Ruter said she 
mentioned it as it applies to the historic areas around downtown and it will 
impact the historic districts. Ms. Ruter noted the plan outlines what the City’s 
Historic Preservation and Archaeology Office does and outlines their goals. Ms. 
Ruter said the original five goals of the 2015 plan are still relevant but this plan 
now provides background information and recommended tools or policy action 
items which vary in complexity. Ms. Ruter said it’s a broad overarching 
document and mentioned she would be going out to the other Villages to make 
this presentation. Ms. Ruter said that today she was ultimately looking for a 
recommendation of approval. 
 
Vice Chair Derie asked for the criteria for a building. Ms. Ruter said it could be 
archaeological resources and the built environment. Ms. Ruter said the Maryvale 
Terrace is a neighborhood of important significance. Vice Chair Derie asked for

Maryvale Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary – June 11, 2025 
Historic Preservation Plan Update 
Page 2 of 3 
 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
the results of the David and Gladys Wright House. Ms. Ruter said the house was 
listed on the National Register of Historic Places and a historic conservation 
easement was put on the house. Vice Chair Derie asked because it was about 
an event center. 
 
Al DePascal asked if it is mainly for the downtown area. Ms. Ruter said this is 
citywide and the plan looks beyond the city to be more innovative. 
 
Vice Chair Derie asked if the Western Savings building was considered historic. 
Ms. Ruter said it was not designated but eligible. Vice Chair Derie said the City 
of Phoenix used to not see the significance of preserving historic structures. 
 
Warren Norgaard asked if the actual plan was the link from the QR Code. Ms. 
Ruter said that was the 55 pages and outlines goals as a summary of the 
different resources and tools they’d like to implement over the next decade. 
 
PUBLIC COMMENTS: 
Opal Wagner from the Encanto Village Planning Committee said that her village 
has some of Phoenix’s largest and oldest historic areas in the City. Ms. Wagner 
brought to the attention of the committee the missing middle housing legislation 
in the areas near downtown. Ms. Wagner said the Encanto Village Planning 
Committee recommended approval of the PreserveHistoricPHX 2025 Historic 
Preservation Plan update with the stipulation that staff amend the report to 
include an assessment and analysis of how the Missing Middle Housing Law 
(A.R.S. Section 9-462.13, HB 2721) will impact Phoenix’s historic 
neighborhoods. 
 
Ms. Wagner added the Camelback East, Central City, Laveen and Rio Vista 
Villages adopted the same amended language. Ms. Wagner shared her 
concerns with the plan update and asked if the Maryvale Village Planning 
Committee would consider doing this. 
 
Al DePascal asked if the State Legislature and what the State passed would 
allow the demolition of historic structures and build 2-story homes in place of 
them. Vice Chair Derie asked if the suggested recommendation would be to 
amplify the voice together of the different Villages. Ms. Wagner said yes and the 
suggestion would make the report better. 
 
Ken DuBose thought what was being asked was not a whole lot. 
 
Al DePascal asked what the Governor said and Ms. Wagner said she had 
signed the House Bill. 
 
Vice Chair Derie asked if they had information about the plan update before and 
Mr. Moric said the Village Planning Committee received a brief update at a

Maryvale Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary – June 11, 2025 
Historic Preservation Plan Update 
Page 3 of 3 
 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
 
 
 
 
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION: 
 
Staff has no comments. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
previous meeting and the Historic Preservation Plan staff report was provided in 
the monthly packet. 
 
Motion 
Patricia Jimenez motioned to recommend approval of the PreserveHistoricPHX 
2025 Historic Preservation Plan update, per the staff recommendation, with 
direction that the staff amend the report to include an assessment and analysis 
of how the Missing Middle Housing Law (A.R.S. Section 9-4692, 13, HB2721) 
will impact Phoenix’s historic neighborhoods. Vice Chair Derie seconded the 
motion. 
 
Vote 
13-0, Motion to recommend approval of the PreserveHistoricPHX 2025 Historic 
Preservation Plan update, per the staff recommendation, with direction passed, 
with Committee Members Acevedo, Alonzo, Demarest, DePascal, DuBose, 
Ewing, Galaviz, Jimenez, Norgaard, Ramirez, Weber, Derie and Barba in favor.

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025)  
 
 
 
 
Date of VPC Meeting 
June 12, 2025 
Request 
Adoption of the Historic Preservation Plan update 
(PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
VPC Recommendation 
Approval, per the staff recommendation, with direction 
VPC Vote 
9-0 
 
 
VPC DISCUSSION: 
 
One member of the public registered to speak on this item, with concerns. 
 
Staff Presentation: 
Helana Ruter, with the City of Phoenix Historic Preservation Office, provided an 
overview of the Historic Preservation Plan update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025), noting 
that the plan will set the framework for historic preservation in Phoenix for the next 10 
years. Ms. Ruter stated that the plan is an update to the 2015 plan. Ms. Ruter discussed 
what the PreserveHistoricPHX 2025 plan includes and the five goal areas of the plan. 
Ms. Ruter concluded with the public hearing timeline and stated that staff recommends 
that the Village Planning Committee provide any final comments and take action to 
recommend formal City Council approval of the plan. 
 
Questions from Committee: 
None. 
 
Public Comments: 
Tom Doescher introduced himself as a member of the Encanto Village Planning 
Committee, with concerns. Mr. Doescher stated that the Encanto Village Planning 
Committee recommended approval of the plan with direction. Mr. Doescher stated that 
the Arizona State Legislature passed a bill called the Missing Middle Housing bill (HB 
2721) a year ago, which will allow duplexes, triplexes and fourplexes in single-family 
residential areas within a mile of the central business district. Mr. Doescher expressed 
concerns with the impacts HB 2721 would have on historic single-family districts and 
historic single-family homes, noting that a majority of the historic districts are within a 
mile of the central business district in Phoenix. Mr. Doescher stated that the Encanto 
Village Planning Committee recommended approval of the plan with direction to 
include an analysis of how HB 2721 would impact historic neighborhoods. Mr.

North Gateway Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
Page 2 of 3 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Doescher requested that the North Gateway Village Planning Committee include this 
same direction in their recommendation.  
 
 
Staff Response: 
None. 
 
Discussion: 
Committee Member Paul Carver asked for clarification if the request would be to take 
HB 2721 into consideration. Mr. Doescher responded affirmatively, noting that the 
Encanto Village Planning Committee tried to get an amendment to the bill to exempt 
historic districts from the bill, but it was at the end of the legislative session and would 
not be heard. Mr. Doescher stated that the State Legislature encouraged them to come 
back to the next session to consider it. Committee Member Carver stated that a 
consideration would not remove the problem to leave the historic districts untouched. 
Mr. Doescher clarified that the recommendation would be approval with direction to 
staff to look at how HB 2721 would impact historic districts. Committee Member Carver 
responded that he would be supportive of this recommendation.  
 
Chair Julie Read stated that the City must comply with State law and cannot exempt 
historic districts if the law does not allow it. Chair Read stated that the direction could 
be for staff to note it and look into it. Chair Read added that Committee members could 
testify at the next legislative session speaking as a member of the Committee, but not 
on behalf of the Committee.  
 
Ms. Ruter stated that the City is working on a Text Amendment to address HB 2721, 
which has to be adopted by the end of the year. 
 
Committee Member Paul Li expressed concerns with adding a stipulation that is fairly 
vague.  
 
Adrian Zambrano, staff, stated that it would not be a stipulation, but rather would be 
direction for staff to look into this topic and include it in an updated version of the plan. 
 
Vice Chair Michelle Ricart asked for clarification if it would be included only if staff is 
able to include it. Mr. Zambrano responded that this is a policy plan and is not 
regulatory, so that information on how the bill affects historic neighborhoods could be 
included. 
 
MOTION: 
Committee Member Li motioned to recommend approval of the Historic Preservation 
Plan update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025), per the staff recommendation, with direction 
to include an analysis of how the Missing Middle Housing bill (HB 2721) will impact 
historic neighborhoods. Vice Chair Ricart seconded the motion. 
 
VOTE: 
9-0; the motion to recommend approval of the Historic Preservation Plan update 
(PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) per the staff recommendation with direction passed with

North Gateway Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
Page 3 of 3 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Committee members Carver, Crouch, Li, Manion, McCarty, Salow, Stein, Ricart and 
Read in favor. 
 
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION: 
 
None.

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
 
 
 
Date of VPC Meeting 
June 18, 2025 
Request 
Adoption of the Historic Preservation Plan update 
(PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
VPC Recommendation 
Approval, per the staff recommendation, with direction 
VPC Vote 
9-0 
 
 
VPC DISCUSSION: 
 
Two members of the public registered to speak on this item. 
 
Staff Presentation: 
Helana Ruter, staff, stated that the draft plan is available online and directed the 
Committee to either the link in the staff report or the QR code in the flyer. Ms. Ruter 
stated that the current plan update is an update to the first plan that was adopted in 
2015. Ms. Ruter stated that the city contracted with a consultant to prepare a report 
and hold various focus groups that identified challenges with historic preservation. Ms. 
Ruter stated that the report was published in 2023, but since that time things have 
come up including recent state legislation, which will have an effect on some of the 
historic districts within one mile of the downtown area. Mr. Ruter stated that she 
anticipated hearing public comments later in the evening and looked forward to 
providing additional information in the plan update to address those concerns. Ms. 
Ruter stated that plan update serves as a framework that discusses the underpinnings 
of historic preservation, the legal basis for historic preservation, accomplishments 
over the last ten years, and outlines the goals for the coming ten years. Ms. Ruter 
stated that the original goals of the 2015 plan were still very relevant but that certain 
tools needed to achieve those goals were missing. Ms. Ruter stated that the city has a 
city archeologist who operates within the city’s Archeology Office under the Arts and 
Culture Department. Ms. Ruter stated that Chapter 8 of the Phoenix Zoning 
Ordinance includes protections of archeological resources but needs some bolstering. 
Ms. Ruter stated that the Historic Preservation Office worked with the city’s 
Archeology Office to provide policy guidance in the plan update to address these 
needs. Ms. Ruter discussed the implementation of the goals of the plan update and 
their timing, as well as the role of the Historic Preservation Commission. Ms. Ruter 
reminded the Committee of the historic preservation video that was presented to the 
Committee a couple months back. Ms. Ruter stated that they were looking to take the 
plan update to the Historic Preservation Commission for recommendation in July, with 
City Council action in the Fall. Ms. Ruter stated they were looking for a

North Mountain Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
GPA-2-25-Y 
Page 2 of 4 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
recommendation from the Committee as well as any direction the Committee may 
have. 
 
Public Comments: 
Aaron Searles identified himself as the Chair of the Encanto Village Planning 
Committee and the Vice President of the Willo District Neighborhood Association. Mr. 
Searles stated that the plan update is missing a discussion regarding the effects of 
the Missing Middle Housing Bill that was passed into law and represents one of the 
greatest challenges to historic preservation that has happened in the last 40 years as 
it represents a radical change to historic neighborhoods located within one mile of 
downtown. Mr. Searles stated that the new law essentially allows historic 
neighborhoods to be torn down and redeveloped as fourplexes without a single-story 
restriction. Mr. Searles stated that the majority of the homes in the Willo District are 
single-story and that the new law would drastically change the character of the 
neighborhood. Mr. Searles stated that the city does not have a lot of history and 
cannot afford to erase what history it has. Mr. Searles stated that when the plan 
update was presented to the Encanto Village Planning Committee, the Committee 
included the following direction for staff: “I move that the Encanto Village Planning 
Committee recommend approval of the Preserve Historic Phoenix 2025 Historic 
Preservation Plan Update with a stipulation that staff amend the report to include an 
assessment and analysis of how the Missing Middle Housing Bill will impact Historic 
districts within one mile of the Central Business District.” Mr. Searles stated that they 
had been out talking to the other Village Planning Committees regarding this issue 
and that he hopes that the North Mountain Committee will join the effort so that others 
will know the potential impact the bill will have on their communities. Committee 
Member Joshua Carmona asked for clarification that the intent was that the plan 
update includes data and other information that discusses how the redevelopment of 
sites as fourplexes etc. are affecting historic neighborhoods. Mr. Searles stated that 
was correct and that the law goes into effect in January of 2026. Committee Member 
Massimo Sommacampagna asked if they had contacted other entities. Mr. Searles 
stated that they had contacted Save Historic Arizona to raise awareness and that they 
had collected over 2,000 signatures. Mr. Searles stated that he has yet to hear 
anyone state that they knew anything about this bill. Committee Member Ricardo 
Romero asked that the plan provide clarity as to the neighborhoods that are affected 
and asked if they were looking for any mitigation efforts. Mr. Searles stated they were 
only asking for the Committee’s recommendation to include a requirement that 
information regarding this issue be included in the plan so that people are aware. 
 
Eric Gilmore stated that he was on the local board with Mr. Searles and was in 
agreement. Mr. Gilmore stated they were not opposed to middle housing but wanted 
to protect the integrity of their historic neighborhood. 
 
Staff Response: 
Ms. Ruter stated that she understands what they are trying to accomplish and has no 
issues with providing that information. Ms. Ruter stated that a Zoning Text 
Amendment would be forthcoming and that she anticipates that it will be business as

North Mountain Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
GPA-2-25-Y 
Page 3 of 4 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
usual with respect to Design Review, but the city cannot prohibit the types of housing 
that state law allows. 
 
Discussion: 
Committee Member Heather Garbarino asked if the inclusion of the requested 
information will impact the timing of the approval process. Ms. Ruter stated that the 
Zoning Text Amendment has not been drafted and that the challenge will be to figure 
out the functional mechanics of how this will be implemented. Ms. Ruter stated that 
the plan update sets up an outline and does not have a lot of narrative attached, and 
that it might be an ongoing effort to analyze the effects of the legislation. Ms. Ruter 
stated that absent the law being repealed, the city does not have the option of not 
complying with the law. 
 
Committee Member Arick O’Hara stated that he had been paying close attention to 
the bill from a public safety perspective since it could result in additional people living 
in a neighborhood that was designed for something different. Committee Member 
O’Hara stated that the bill discusses the central business corridor as being a one-mile 
buffer around that area but does not go into specific detail as to where that might 
occur. Committee Member O’Hara asked if the city has already defined the boundary. 
Ms. Ruter stated that her understanding was that the intent was to make the 
downtown area the Central Business District, and that the law would apply to that 
area and a one-mile buffer. Committee Member O’Hara asked if that would include 
the Willo District. Ms. Ruter stated that it would include 22 historic neighborhoods 
including the Willo District. Committee Member O’Hara asked the committee if there 
was any interest in entertaining Mr. Searles’ request and while clarifying that he was 
not making a motion, read Mr. Searles’ proposed motion into the record as follows: “I 
move that North Mountain Village Planning Committee recommend approval of the 
Preserve Historic Phoenix 2025 Historic Preservation Plan Update with a stipulation 
that staff amend the report to include an assessment and analysis of how the Middle 
Housing Law, ARS Section 9-462-13, House Bill 2721 will impact historic districts 
within one mile of Phoenix’s Central Business District.” Committee Member Gabriel 
Jaramillo asked if that should be amended to include the forthcoming coming Zoning 
Text Amendment. Mr. Kuhfuss, staff, stated that the text amendment was not on the 
table for discussion and that the Committee would potentially be looking for staff to 
include an analysis of the house bill in the plan update. Committee Member Garbarino 
stated that she would like to add potential mitigation measures. Committee Member 
Jim Larson stated that he understood that the Committee was to vote on the plan 
update and asked for clarification as to how mitigation measures would be included in 
the plan update. Committee Member Garbarino stated that it would be included in the 
discussion. 
 
MOTION: 
Committee Arick O’Hara motioned to recommend approval of the Historic 
Preservation Plan update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025), per the staff recommendation, 
with direction that staff amend the report to include an assessment and analysis, and 
possible mitigation, of how the Middle Housing Law, ARS Section 9-462-13, House

North Mountain Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
GPA-2-25-Y 
Page 4 of 4 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Bill 2721 will impact historic districts within one mile of Phoenix’s Central Business 
District. Committee Member Heather Garbarino seconded the motion. 
 
VOTE: 
9-0, motion to recommend approval of the Historic Preservation Plan update 
(PreserveHistoricPHX 2025), per the staff recommendation, with direction with 
Committee Members Alauria, Carmona, Garbarino, Jaramillo, Knapp, Larson, O’Hara, 
Sommacampagna, and Matthews in favor and none opposed. 
 
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION: 
 
None

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
 
 
 
Date of VPC Meeting 
June 2, 2025 
Request 
Request to adopt the Historic Preservation Plan 
update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
VPC Recommendation 
Approval, per the staff recommendation 
VPC Vote 
14-0 
 
VPC DISCUSSION: 
 
No members of the public registered to speak on this item. 
 
Kevin Weight with the Historic Preservation Office provided an update of the City’s 
Historic Preservation Plan update. Mr. Weight noted this was an update to the city’s 
first Historic Preservation Plan which was adopted in 2015. Mr. Weight added that a 
collaborative effort began with a consultant’s recommendations for improvements to 
advance historic preservation in Phoenix which launched a public engagement 
process to identify goals/tools/actions to create a draft plan update.  
 
Mr. Weight stated the PreserveHistoricPHX 2025 plan supports and refines the goal 
in the General Plan under Celebrate Our Diverse Communities and Neighborhoods 
to encourage historic and cultural preservation in the planning process. Mr. Weight 
added that it details the social and cultural, economic and environmental benefits of 
historic preservation. Mr. Weight said it supplies a legal and historical background on 
historic preservation nationally and in Phoenix. Mr. Weight stated it provides a 
timeline of historic preservation in Phoenix, outlines the City of Phoenix Historic 
Preservation Program, and assesses accomplishments since the adoption of the 
historic plan from 2015. 
 
Mr. Weight said the PreserveHistoricPHX 2025 plan includes five goal areas, each 
of which has defined tools, processes or actions to facilitate accomplishment and 
achieve the vision of the 2025 plan. Mr. Weight stated the goal areas include protect 
archaeological resources, protect historic resources, explore preservation incentives, 
develop community awareness, and promote partnerships. Mr. Weight added the 
Vision Statement for the plan as: Phoenix is a vibrant and dynamic place with many 
layers of history. Together with PlanPHX’s central vision of a “More Connected 
Phoenix,” PreserveHistoricPHX2025 envisions a city linked by an appreciation for its 
diverse heritage and a desire to sustain it for the benefit of present and future

Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary – June 2, 2025 
Historic Preservation Plan Update 
Page 2 of 2 
 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
generations. Mr. Weight concluded his presentation by sharing a timeline for plan 
approval and noted staff was recommending approval of the plan. 
 
Mr. Wise noted he read about a legislative bill where historic buildings could be torn 
down to put up multiple buildings like in the Encanto area. Mr. Weight said it is the 
missing middle housing bill and said it was being addressed but not part of the initial 
plan as the bill was passed a month or two ago. Mr. Weight said it would affect 
neighborhoods mainly in the Encanto and Central City Villages. Mr. Weight added 
the Village Planning Committees will work with staff on a text amendment to work 
through it as gracefully as they can as it is not popular in the historic districts but still 
will need to meet the intent of the state legislation. 
 
Motion 
Roy Wise motioned to recommend approval of the historic preservation plan per the 
staff recommendation. Paul Hamra seconded the motion. 
 
Vote 
14-0; motion to recommend approval of the historic preservation plan update per the 
staff recommendation passes with Committee members Balderrama, Franks, 
Goodhue, Gubser, Hamra, Marcolla, Mazza, Petersen, Schmidt, Sepic, Soronson, 
Wise, Sommer, and Mortensen in favor. 
 
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION: 
 
Staff has no comments.

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
 
 
 
 
Date of VPC Meeting 
June 10, 2025 
Request 
Adoption of the Historic Preservation Plan update 
(PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
VPC Recommendation 
Approval, per the staff recommendation, with direction 
VPC Vote 
5-0 
 
 
VPC DISCUSSION: 
 
One member of the public registered to speak on this item. 
 
Staff Presentation: 
Kevin Weight, with the City of Phoenix Historic Preservation Office, introduced himself 
and provided an overview of the Historic Preservation Plan update. Mr. Weight shared 
how to access the plan. Mr. Weight discussed what the update is for and the 
collaborative effort of the plan update. Mr. Weight shared what the plan update includes 
and the goals of the plan update. Mr. Weight concluded with the public hearing timeline 
and stated that staff recommends the Village Planning Committee provide any final 
comments and take action to recommend formal City Council approval.  
 
Questions from the Committee: 
Committee Member Eileen Baden asked if there is a focus on reusing historic 
buildings and if there are any incentives for historic preservation. Mr. Weight responded 
affirmatively, noting that it was addressed in the 2015 plan and has been expanded 
upon in the plan update. Mr. Weight stated that there is a fairly robust grant program 
that is funded both by the general fund as well as the 2023 General Obligation Bond. 
Mr. Weight stated that the grant program provides incentives and funds for rehabilitation 
and adaptive reuse. Mr. Weight added that the Historic Preservation Offices works 
closely with the Office of Customer Advocacy for their adaptive reuse program. Mr. 
Weight stated that there are also fee waivers and preferential treatment of the building 
code for adaptive reuse projects.  
 
Chair Dino Cotton asked if there are historic underground tunnels in Phoenix. Mr. 
Weight responded that some do exist, but they may not be to the extent that people 
have rumored. Mr. Weight stated that there are basements that are connected and 
some government buildings that are connected underground.

Rio Vista Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
Page 2 of 3 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Committee Member Will Holton asked how far back historic preservation goals in 
Phoenix go and if there is any federal interest in historic preservation. Mr. Weight 
responded that two of the goals in the plan are to protect archaeological resources as 
well as historic resources. Mr. Weight stated that the historic built environment started 
when Phoenix first became a city around 1867. Mr. Weight added that there is a lengthy 
history with indigenous people in Phoenix, which the Archaeology Office works with to 
protect archaeological resources. Mr. Weight stated that the City of Phoenix Historic 
Preservation Office works closely with the Arizona State Historic Preservation Office 
and the National Park Service. Mr. Weight added that their office follows the Secretary 
of Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic 
Buildings. Mr. Weight stated that the state and federal level also have tax incentives for 
historic preservation. Committee Member Holton asked what impact archaeological 
discoveries have on construction. Mr. Weight responded that there are strict laws 
regarding archaeological resources, especially for human remains. 
 
Committee Member Baden stated that Phoenix used to have trolleys and San 
Francisco has turned their trolley system into a tourism opportunity. Committee Member 
Baden asked if the plan addresses the trolley lines in Phoenix. Mr. Weight responded 
that it does not address trolley lines specifically. Mr. Weight stated that light rail has 
been a big transportation investment in Phoenix, and they have worked with the 
Planning staff to support light rail and ensure minimal impact to historic properties as 
the light rail lines are constructed. Mr. Weight added that there are maps that show 
where the trolley lines were and there are still some rails buried in certain locations 
along certain streets.  
 
Committee Member Ozzie Virgil asked if there are any maps showing where 
stagecoach lines were. Mr. Weight responded that there is documentation in data 
archives that shows where stagecoach lines were, noting that some did go as far north 
in Phoenix as the Rio Vista Village. Mr. Weight stated that this would be of interest for 
their office to research moving forward for the next 10 years.  
 
Committee Member Baden stated that human remains can typically be found around 
river corridors, since that is where people used to live. Committee Member Baden 
asked if there could be opportunities for wayfinding signage or mile markers along the 
river corridors to incorporate cultural significance into the signage as the river corridors 
are improved, such as for Rio Reimagined project. Mr. Weight responded affirmatively, 
noting that they would encourage it and it is something that would fit nicely into the plan. 
Mr. Weight stated that they have done it along the light rail lines for historic properties.  
 
Public Comments: 
Opal Wagner introduced herself as a member of the Encanto Village Planning 
Committee. Ms. Wagner stated that the Encanto Village has many of Phoenix’s oldest 
and largest historic districts. Ms. Wagner stated that there was a bill called the Missing 
Middle Housing bill that was signed into law last year, which targets all single-family 
neighborhoods within one mile from the central business district, which includes 22 
historic districts, for redevelopment as multifamily. Ms. Wagner stated that each lot 
could be developed into as many as four units. Ms. Wagner stated that many historic

Rio Vista Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
Page 3 of 3 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
homes are one-story, but the bill does not allow height restriction less than two stories. 
Ms. Wagner stated that the bill also allows lot splits into four parcels. Ms. Wagner stated 
that the plan update does not include anything about the Missing Middle Housing law. 
Ms. Wagner stated that the Encanto Village Planning Committee recommended 
approval with a condition to amend the plan to include an assessment and analysis of 
how the Missing Middle Housing law (HB 2721) will impact historic districts. Ms. Wagner 
stated that the Central City, Camelback East, and Laveen Village Planning Committees 
also recommended this.  
 
Staff Response: 
Mr. Weight responded that staff supports Ms. Opal’s recommendation. Mr. Weight 
stated that it was not deliberate to exclude mention of the Missing Middle Housing law in 
the plan but rather a timing issue. Mr. Weight stated that this would be the time to 
address anything that is missing from the plan. 
 
Discussion: 
Committee Member Virgil asked for clarification that Mr. Weight was not the one that 
left the Missing Middle Housing law out of the plan. Mr. Weight responded that he was 
not. Mr. Weight stated that it was a timing issue, since the plan update began back in 
2021 and the law was just recently passed. Mr. Weight added that staff appreciates any 
feedback of missing items from the plan.  
 
Committee Member Holton asked if there is anything that needs to be tailored to the 
Rio Vista Village. Vice Chair Scott Lawrence responded that there are no historic 
districts within the Rio Vista Village.  
 
Chair Cotton stated that the only historic property in the Rio Vista Village may be 
Pioneer Village. 
 
MOTION:  
Vice Chair Lawrence motioned to recommend approval of the Historic Preservation 
Plan update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025), per the staff recommendation, with direction 
to amend the plan to address how the Missing Middle Housing law (HB 2721) will 
impact historic properties, per the Encanto Village Planning Committee 
recommendation. Committee Member Virgil seconded the motion. 
 
VOTE:  
5-0; the motion to recommend approval of the Historic Preservation Plan update 
(PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) per the staff recommendation with direction passed with 
Committee members Baden, Holton, Virgil, Lawrence and Cotton in favor.   
 
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION: 
 
None.

Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
 
Date of VPC Meeting 
June 10, 2025 
Request 
Request to adopt the Historic Preservation Plan 
update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
VPC Recommendation 
Continuance to the July 8, 2025 Village Planning 
Committee meeting 
VPC Vote 
11-0 
 
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS: 
 
One member of the public registered to speak on this item and did not indicate support or 
opposition. 
 
STAFF PRESENTATION 
 
Helana Ruter, staff, provided a presentation regarding the draft PreserveHistoricPHX 
2025 Historic Preservation Plan Update. Ms. Ruter stated that the plan builds upon the 
2015 plan, stated that the plan is intended to guide the City’s preservation efforts over 
the next decade, explained that consultant work for the plan identified key challenges 
facing preservation, and stated that the project included robust public outreach. Ms. 
Ruter stated that feedback from Village Planning Committees emphasized the need to 
reflect recent state legislation, including the Missing Middle Housing Bill, explained that 
the plan includes five overarching goals, and stated that the plan is designed to be 
nested under the General Plan. Ms. Ruter requested final comments from the 
Committee, asked for a recommendation of approval, and stated that the plan will be 
ultimately adopted by City Council. 
 
QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE 
 
Committee Member George Brooks shared that there are many historic buildings in 
South Phoenix, expressed concern that there is confusion among residents about how 
historic preservation regulations apply, and stated that property owners often wish to 
modify their homes while retaining historic designation. Ms. Ruter responded that the 
goal of the plan is not to preserve buildings in a static or “amber-like” state, but to allow 
for respectful alterations that maintain historical integrity. 
 
PUBLIC COMMENT 
 
Tom Doescher explained that he is a member of the Encanto Village Planning 
Committee, described the Missing Middle Housing Bill, explained that the bill was 
passed by the State Legislature in 2024, and explained that the bill allows additional

South Mountain Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
June 10, 2025 
Page 2 of 4 
 
residential units within one mile of the Central Business District (CBD). Mr. Doescher 
stated that most of Phoenix’s historic districts fall within the one-mile radius of the CBD, 
expressed concern that the bill could lead to increased demolition of historic buildings, 
and requested that the plan include an analysis of its potential impacts. 
 
FLOOR/PUBLIC DISCUSSION CLOSED: MOTION, DISCUSSION, AND VOTE 
 
Committee Member Fred Daniels asked whether funding is being pursued for historic 
home rehabilitation and referenced a requirement that recipients live on the property. Ms. 
Ruter stated that the City currently has GO Bond funds available for grants, some of 
which are allocated to residential properties, stated that the funding focuses on exterior 
improvements, and explained that the funding allows for up to $20,000 in matching 
funds. 
 
Committee Member Mark Beehler stated that he did not understand the issue with the 
Missing Middle Housing Bill and asked for information on the Bill’s impact on the Historic 
Preservation Plan. Ms. Ruter stated that a Missing Middle Housing Text Amendment is 
forthcoming and acknowledged concerns that the bill has not been referenced in the 
plan. Ms. Ruter stated that she is requesting recommendation of approval and that 
information will be added to address how state-level changes may impact historic 
preservation. 
 
Committee Member Kassandra Alvarez stated that she needs more information about 
the Missing Middle Housing Bill, expressed concern that the plan is vague on protections 
for archaeological resources, and stated that Indigenous people should be represented 
in the process. Ms. Ruter stated that archaeological protection is addressed by another 
department that meets with four tribes and stated that protecting archaeological 
resources is important to the City. 
 
Vice Chair Emma Viera asked what exactly was being requested. Ms. Ruter stated that 
she was requesting approval of the Historic Preservation Plan Update, stated that the 
plan is intended to be nested under the General Plan, explained the plan would be 
adopted by City Council, and stated that the plan establish policies that outline what the 
City wants to accomplish over the next ten years. 
 
Committee Member Kay Shepard asked whether archaeology is handled by another 
department. Ms. Ruter confirmed that archaeology is handled by another department, 
stated that archaeological protection is within the Historic Preservation Ordinance, and 
explained that they are looking to partner more with the Archaeology Office. 
 
Committee Member Brooks asked for clarification on what the motion would include. 
Chair Arthur Greathouse III asked how other Village Planning Committees had voted 
on the item. Samuel Rogers, staff, explained that Laveen and Central City Village

South Mountain Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
June 10, 2025 
Page 3 of 4 
 
Planning Committees had both approved the plan with direction that the plan be 
amended to address how the Missing Middle Housing Bill will impact historic districts. 
 
Committee Member Beehler stated that he had not seen the updated Historic 
Preservation Plan and did not want to vote on something he had not seen. Committee 
Member Beehler asked for clarification on the direction the other Village Planning 
Committees had provided. Mr. Rogers stated that at the other Village Planning 
Committees there were community concerns that the Missing Middle Housing Bill would 
incentivize demolition of historic buildings. Mr. Rogers stated that the Committee had 
received a video presentation on the Historic Preservation Plan Update at the prior 
meeting. 
 
Chair Greathouse asked what options were available for a motion. Mr. Rogers stated 
that it would be at Ms. Ruter’s discretion whether a continuance would be acceptable and 
stated that the Committee could approve, deny, or take no action on the plan. 
 
Ms. Ruter stated that a hyperlink to the plan was included in the staff report provided in 
the Committee’s packet, but that the full plan was not included in the packet. Ms. Ruter 
stated that she would ensure a direct link is distributed and stated that she is willing to 
return next month. 
 
Committee Member Lee Coleman asked how many historic buildings and how many 
historic neighborhoods are designated in South Phoenix. Ms. Ruter stated that she 
would follow up at the next meeting. 
 
Committee Member Brooks identified two historic properties in the South Mountain 
Village. 
 
Committee Member F. Daniels asked for the criteria used to determine what qualifies 
as a historic property. 
 
Chair Greathouse asked for an explanation of the Missing Middle Housing Bill. Mr. 
Rogers stated that staff are working on a Text Amendment to comply with the bill but 
village planning staff have not yet been educated on the bill yet. 
 
Mr. Doescher stated that the bill would eliminate single-family zoning, expressed that 
the bill had good intentions but was poorly implemented, stated that legislative overreach 
will impact South Phoenix, stated that bills are being passed without consideration for 
how they affect cities and towns, and referenced a study published by the City of Tucson. 
 
Motion:  
Committee Member Kay Shepard made a motion to recommend a continuance of the 
Historic Preservation Plan update to the July 8, 2025 South Mountain Village Planning 
Committee meeting. Committee George Brooks seconded the motion.

South Mountain Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Historic Preservation Plan Update (PreserveHistoricPHX 2025) 
June 10, 2025 
Page 4 of 4 
 
 
Vote: 
11-0, motion to recommend a continuance of the Historic Preservation Plan update to 
the July 8, 2025 South Mountain Village Planning Committee meeting passed with 
Committee Members Alvarez, Beehler, Brooks, Busching, Coleman, F. Daniels, Falcon, 
Shepard, Thompson, Viera, and Greathouse in favor. 
 
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION: 
 
None.