Attachment C - VPC Summary-Info Only - Z-TA-1-20-8.pdf

City of Phoenix — Formal (2020-11-04)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 4187 characters
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-TA-1-20-8 
INFORMATION ONLY 
Date of VPC Meeting 
June 8, 2020 
Request 
Amend Section 1202.D. (Regulating Maps, Density 
Map) of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to replace the 
Downtown Code Density Map to amend density 
provisions from 218 maximum dwelling units per acre 
to No Density Limit at the southeast corner of 6th 
Street and Garfield Street and amend Section 1214.B. 
(Evans Churchill East, Development Standards) to 
allow for a height bonus up to ten percent and to 
increase the maximum lot coverage south of Garfield 
Street from 50 percent to 90 percent. 
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
Four speaker cards were submitted in favor, wishing to speak. 
Nick Wood, representing the applicant, with Snell and Wilmer, LLP introduced himself 
and the proposed project. Mr. Wood displayed aerial images to review the surrounding 
area and renderings of the proposed building. Mr. Wood ended his presentation by 
showing the proposed changes to the text of the Downtown Code.  
Shannon Dubasik asked if the project will be under-parked. Mr. Wood replied that the 
project will provide parking at a ratio that is adequate for developments in downtown 
Phoenix.  
Chair Rachel Frazier-Johnson asked about the parking ratio, as it did not appear to 
be 1:1 with the proposed number of units. Mr. Wood responded that most projects in 
Downtown Phoenix do not use a 1:1 parking ratio, as not all residents need a parking 
spot.  
Darlene Martinez asked if there would be visitor parking at the site. Mr. Wood replied 
that visitor parking was included in the total parking calculation, 201 spaces.  
Wayne Rainey shared that in many major cities, projects are not parked at a 1:1 ratio 
and the committee should encourage less parking in applicant’s proposals. Mr. Rainey 
Attachment C

Central City Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Z-TA-1-20-8 
June 8, 2020 
Page 2 
 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
added that this project is proposing art on the exterior and is in the Arts District. He 
added that in some Arts Districts, the area gets taken over and changes to become 
something different than what the neighborhood used to be.  
 
Eva Olivas asked for the applicant’s slides, what outreach the applicant has done to 
their neighbors next door, if they had an overflow parking plan, where all the parking 
would be located, and if the on-street parking was metered. Mr. Wood responded that 
they had spoken with representatives of Tonatierra Community Development to the 
southeast, their neighbors directly to the east, the Garfield Neighborhood, Arizona 
State University, Downtown Phoenix Inc, and Phoenix Community Alliance. Mr. Wood 
continued that all parking would be within the structure onsite, they did not anticipate 
any overflow parking on the street or invading the nearby neighborhoods, and that he 
believed the on-street parking was metered.  
 
Sean Sweat echoed Mr. Rainey’s sentiments about parking and shared that the 
committee should treat parking in an urban way. Mr. Sweat asked for clarification on 
the request to amend the height map and allow for a height bonus. Mr. Wood clarified 
that the request is to ament the text for a height bonus, not to amend the height map.  
 
Chair Rachel Frazier-Johnson expressed to the applicant that she hoped they did not 
feel that they were being questioned repeatedly over parking, and that we have all had 
the trouble of going to a place without adequate parking.  
 
Eva Olivas asked if there would be a possibility to make the art a public art piece and if 
members of the public could contribute ideas. Mr. Wood replied that they would 
welcome all ideas or thoughts on the art component.  
 
Chair Rachel Frazier-Johnson asked if the applicant had spoken with the Office of 
Arts and Culture with the City of Phoenix. Mr. Wood replied that they had not, but it 
was an excellent idea.