Entity Search

believes that the · Person

1 mention

believes that the conditional use permit use should · Person

1 mention

believes that the current list of possible amenities is clear within · Person

1 mention

believes that the final product is truly · Person

1 mention

believes that the limited use of the site to non-retail whol · Person

1 mention

believes that the proposed DMP Major Amendment · Person

1 mention

believes that the reasons set forth in paragraph 3 constitute good cause for extending the · Person

1 mention

believes that the requested · Person

1 mention

believes that the requested deviations from the required Rural- · Person

1 mention

believes that the resulting pond will pose a great opportunity for the site to · Person

1 mention

believes that these · Person

1 mention

believes that the SVTs will not be needed to ensure the safety · Person

1 mention

believes that the use of eminent domain will be required in order to obtain title to said property; · Person

1 mention

believes that this an appropriate · Person

1 mention

believes that this guidance supports the proposal to amend the Downtown · Person

1 mention

believes that this guidance supports the proposal to amend the Downtown South · Person

1 mention

believes the · Person

1 mention

believes the addition of parking spaces does not · Person

1 mention

believes the area is in critical need of building capacity to combat crime and blight · Person

1 mention

· First appearance: 2022-06-01

believes the C-3 CUPD zoning is appropriate for the site and · Person

1 mention

believes the change is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive plan as it · Person

1 mention

believes the existing system(s) are · Person

1 mention

believes the existing system(s) are adequate in · Person

1 mention

believes the existing system(s) are adequate in size to · Person

1 mention

believes the granting of the subject · Person

1 mention

believes the intent with the form liner · Person

1 mention

believes the new · Person

1 mention

· First appearance: 2023-12-06

believes the Project is wholly consistent with specific goals · Person

1 mention

believes the proposal meets and improves the intent of the Comprehensive Plan as the · Person

1 mention

believes the proposed Agreements support and advance the City's long-term · Person

1 mention

believes the proposed industrial zoning is appropriate. This area has and will continue to · Person

1 mention

believes the proposed lease provides an appropriate interim framework that balances the · Person

1 mention

believes the proposed WCF · Person

1 mention

believes the resulting building footprints will better accommodate land uses · Person

1 mention

believes the revenue the City would receive through the · Person

1 mention

believes these changes should address the long-term funding imbalance for RideChoice. The primary · Person

1 mention

believes these potential concerns · Person

1 mention

believes the shade structures are appropriate · Person

1 mention

believes the Special Use Permit request is reasonable and necessary to maintain and · Person

1 mention

believes the use could be evaluated in 10 years to determine · Person

1 mention

believes this interpretation of the property’s · Person

1 mention

believes this is consistent and compatible with · Person

1 mention

believes this plan – in conjunction with other audits completed in · Person

1 mention

believes this plan provides adequate coverage across City · Person

1 mention

believes this project · Person

1 mention

believes this roadway abandonment request meets the statutory requirements and · Person

1 mention

believes this to be a civil matter to be resolved between private property owners · Person

1 mention

believes utilizing the cooperative agreement is the most efficient and cost-effective · Person

1 mention

believes we may have overstepped our · Person

1 mention

believe that the proposed language of this text amendment meets this · Person

1 mention