Entity Search

finds that there are no applicable conditions or special circumstances existing on the prop- · Person

1 mention

finds that the requested Comprehensive Sign Plan (CSP) meets the required findings · Person

1 mention

finds that the requested revocation of the Special Use Permit meets the required findings · Person

1 mention

finds that the requested SCIP meets the required findings outlined in MZO Section 11-73- · Person

1 mention

finds that the requested SCIP meets the required findings outlined in MZO Section 11-733. · Person

1 mention

finds that the requested Special Use Permit for a Transitional Community Residence meets · Person

1 mention

finds that the requested Special Use Permits meets the required findings outlined in Mesa · Person

1 mention

finds that the requested Special Use Permit (SUP) for a Comprehensive Sign Plan (CSP) · Person

1 mention

finds that the requested Special Use Permit (SUP) meets the review criteria outlined in the · Person

1 mention

finds that the requested Special Use Permit to modify an existing Comprehensive Sign Plan · Person

1 mention

finds that the requested Substantial Conformance Improvement Permit meets the required · Person

1 mention

finds that the requested Substantial Conformance Improvement Permit (SCIP) meets the · Person

1 mention

finds that the requested Variance meets the required findings outlined in MZO Section 11- · Person

1 mention

finds that the requested Variance meets the required findings outlined in MZO Section 1180-3. · Person

1 mention

finds that the request for a Special Use Permit (SUP) meets the required findings outlined · Person

1 mention

finds that this is consistent · Person

1 mention

finds that this proposal complements the early 20th-century commercial style of · Person

1 mention

finds the · Person

1 mention

finds the application to be an attempt to resolve · Person

1 mention

finds the expansion request of the sports therapy and training facility · Person

1 mention

finds the location to be suitable for general commercial as it · Person

1 mention

finds the location to be suitable for the · Person

1 mention

finds the proposal consistent with the General Plan. Due to the infill · Person

1 mention

finds the proposal in conformance with the General Plan and the single and multifamily · Person

1 mention

finds the proposal is consistent with the General Plan and more · Person

1 mention

finds the proposal to be consistent with the · Person

1 mention

finds the proposal to be consistent with the goals of the General Plan and · Person

1 mention

finds the proposal to be consistent with the goals of the General Plan and the · Person

1 mention

finds the proposed commercial · Person

1 mention

finds the proposed location is appropriate for a WCF as it is in an area of sparce · Person

1 mention

finds the proposed use to be appropriate for the area It will be in concert with area land use · Person

1 mention

finds there are · Person

1 mention

finds there are significant challenges relating to the topography and · Person

1 mention

finds the request · Person

1 mention

finds the request conforms to · Person

1 mention

finds the requested signage · Person

1 mention

finds the request ZON21-03 conforms · Person

1 mention

finds the submittal to meet the · Person

1 mention

finds this MCP request for the proposed usage an acceptable use for the area and · Person

1 mention

Find that the conditional use permit criteria have been met and adopt · Person

1 mention

· First appearance: 2020-01-14 · Latest: 2020-12-07

Find that the conditional use permit criteria have been met and adopt Resolution No. · Person

1 mention

· First appearance: 2023-04-04 · Latest: 2025-06-10

Find that the conditional use permit criteria have been met and adopt Resolution No. · Person

1 mention

· First appearance: 2023-04-04 · Latest: 2025-06-10

find that the Proposed Project is consistent with the Mesa 2050 General Plan and the · Person

1 mention

find that the Proposed Project is consistent with the Mesa 2050 General Plan and the criteria · Person

1 mention

find that the Proposed Project is consistent with the Mesa 2050 General Plan and the Mesa · Person

1 mention

fing numbers for AUS and cost; stratification model. · Person

1 mention

fing was · Person

1 mention

. (Finish to comply with general · Person

1 mention

Finn · Person

1 mention

Finn (telephonically) · Person

1 mention