Entity Search

had discussions with the neighbor to the northeast of · Person

1 mention

had done a great job. · Person

1 mention

had done any community · Person

1 mention

had done any research on what the market will bear and Jarrad stated nothing · Person

1 mention

had done bilingual outreach and that there had been 88 people in support · Person

1 mention

had drafted Stipulation No. 1 · Person

1 mention

had expressed appreciation for the informational table about the Veterans Honor Wall. · Person

1 mention

had expressed the same concerns. Mr. Beaudoin noted that the proposed parking · Person

1 mention

had failed to comply with the stipulations of · Person

1 mention

had failed to establish that the property was ineligible or that an economic · Person

1 mention

· First appearance: 2024-02-21

had filed independently a fee would be · Person

1 mention

had filed the information required by subsection A of this section with the county · Person

1 mention

had general questions about the proposed land uses. The · Person

1 mention

had gone to mobile home parks to conduct an · Person

1 mention

had gotten any feedback from · Person

1 mention

had gotten approval from their HOA. · Person

1 mention

had heard back from the next door neighbor? · Person

1 mention

had indicated a meeting date change would require a vote by the · Person

1 mention

had just acquired the property? · Person

1 mention

had made this recommendation. Mr. Gastelum · Person

1 mention

had met with the North Glen Square · Person

1 mention

had no concerns with the proposed · Person

1 mention

had no information to report other than a few prospective bond · Person

1 mention

had no information to report other than a few prospective bond applicants · Person

1 mention

had no knowledge of · Person

1 mention

had not been directed by Council to engage · Person

1 mention

had not conducted sufficient outreach to the community. · Person

1 mention

had not expressed any concerns. Chair Gonzales asked what percentage the · Person

1 mention

had not had prices when the contracts were discussed with · Person

1 mention

had not had the opportunity · Person

1 mention

had notified all property owners within 500 feet of the proposed property. She reported · Person

1 mention

had not made any requests. · Person

1 mention

had not met all of the · Person

1 mention

had not notified GRFD of the project and had not provided GRFD with · Person

1 mention

had not received · Person

1 mention

had not received any community · Person

1 mention

had not received any community input on the request. Mr. · Person

1 mention

had not received any community input to-date and · Person

1 mention

had not received any correspondence and the · Person

1 mention

had not received any correspondence regarding the case. · Person

1 mention

had not received comments from CenturyLink and · Person

1 mention

had passed away. · Person

1 mention

had pre-empted the GSC. He did not think it would correct the problem. · Person

1 mention

had presented a series of tools to Council in January aimed at · Person

1 mention

had previously engaged Sister Cities for the familiarization tours. · Person

1 mention

had proposed. · Person

1 mention

had provided · Person

1 mention

had provided a deadline of the end of the · Person

1 mention

had provided a revised site plan the day prior and that staff had not had the opportunity · Person

1 mention

had received a large file with about · Person

1 mention