Entity Search

Find developers, law firms, planning firms, and other entities mentioned across public meetings.

37401 results found.

indicated a reallocation · Person
1 mention
Indicated below. · Person
1 mention
indicated below to close the project without delay and submit the necessary final closeout · Person
1 mention
indicated he wanted to move forward. · Person
1 mention
indicated it is normally having trash enclosures with sound buffers but will · Person
1 mention
indicated on his neighborhood notification letter. Ms. LaVelle clarified the hours in the · Person
1 mention
indicated reallocation · Person
1 mention
· First appearance: 2023-11-15 · Latest: 2024-11-13
indicated that a recalculation · Person
1 mention
indicated that he had no additional · Person
1 mention
indicated that none of the · Person
1 mention
indicated that the city right-of- · Person
1 mention
indicated that the existing zoning and surrounding industrial area were well-suited for my · Person
1 mention
indicated that the machine is similar to a tractor with regard to noise and emissions. Staff has · Person
1 mention
indicated that the property owners have agreed to make the proper · Person
1 mention
indicated that there is an existing view fence provided by ADOT adjacent · Person
1 mention
indicated that the site is currently pursuing rezoning from R-5 · Person
1 mention
indicated that they do not know at this time what the · Person
1 mention
indicated that the zone change will be to facilitate a future auto · Person
1 mention
indicated the · Person
1 mention
indicated the elevations are conceptual in nature and may not reflect a · Person
1 mention
indicated there are no existing towers or structures located · Person
1 mention
indicated they could eliminate stipulation #2 · Person
1 mention
indicated they had completed a thorough investigation and exhausted · Person
1 mention
· First appearance: 2025-06-04
indicated they would allow Ms. Smeck to replace the roof prior to the · Person
1 mention
· First appearance: 2022-09-21
indicated those residents would not have been eligible if the Town were not · Person
1 mention
indicated to attendees that the Project will be a gated for-sale · Person
1 mention
indicated was · Person
1 mention
indicates 122 spaces exceeds · Person
1 mention
indicates a maximum of 65% shade can be · Person
1 mention
indicates a minimum setback of 190 · Person
1 mention
indicates approximately 310 fewer daily vehicle trips with the proposed · Person
1 mention
indicates a sufficient number of parking spaces are provided on-site to meet the needs of · Person
1 mention
indicates that · Person
1 mention
indicates that a hotel with the West Parcel may contribute to and benefit from · Person
1 mention
indicates that as of the date · Person
1 mention
indicates that the nearest water line is located 2.5 miles away from the subject site. · Person
1 mention
indicates the City would prefer if the site was zoned C-1. C-1 being the allowed · Person
1 mention
indicates the easement · Person
1 mention
indicates the majority of the building’s interior space · Person
1 mention
indicates the parcel as “± 1.00 acre” – meaning “plus or minus · Person
1 mention
indicates the proposed project will have a minimal impact to the existing natural · Person
1 mention
indicates the proposed project will have minimal impacts to the natural environment and · Person
1 mention
indicates the subject site’s zone change will align with · Person
1 mention
indicates they built an · Person
1 mention
indicates they will work with ASLD to establish legal access and ensure proper roadway · Person
1 mention
indicate that there are no · Person
1 mention
indicate that these concerns remain. · Person
1 mention
indicate that you expressed support for their case. · Person
1 mention
indicate there are two · Person
1 mention
indirect rate is 16.8% and they will not recover · Person
1 mention