Entity Search

received eight support letters mentioning that this facility is a · Person

1 mention

received eleven letters of support and three letters of opposition. · Person

1 mention

received e-mail correspondence from one city resident noting concerns with the · Person

1 mention

received emails and letters from three property owners in the Goldfield · Person

1 mention

received feedback from City Council · Person

1 mention

received feedback to · Person

1 mention

received five (5) letters of opposition · Person

1 mention

received five (5) letters of support and eight (8) · Person

1 mention

received five (5) “Statements of Qualifications” (SOQ) from · Person

1 mention

received for CUP25-10 · Person

1 mention

received four (4) · Person

1 mention

received four (4) emails in support of this request. The applicant also submitted a letter of · Person

1 mention

received four (4) letters and one (1) · Person

1 mention

received four (4) letters from adjacent/internal jurisdictions · Person

1 mention

received four (4) responses to the · Person

1 mention

received four letters from adjacent · Person

1 mention

received four letters of support and one letter of opposition. The · Person

1 mention

received four letters of support in addition to · Person

1 mention

received four “Statements of Qualifications” (SOQ) from contractors · Person

1 mention

received from people in the · Person

1 mention

received from the Chandler Chamber of Commerce after the staff memo was · Person

1 mention

received letters from 258 individuals (adjusted for · Person

1 mention

received letters from 39 individuals in opposition following the · Person

1 mention

received letters from 445 individuals (adjusted for · Person

1 mention

received letters of support for the · Person

1 mention

received multiple comments in opposition · Person

1 mention

received negative feedback in · Person

1 mention

received new complaints of events being held on the site as of September 2025. There were · Person

1 mention

received nine responses by the deadline of · Person

1 mention

received nine support letters and five opposition letters · Person

1 mention

received no · Person

1 mention

received no comment from the public. The only response from the staff · Person

1 mention

received no comments · Person

1 mention

received no comments in · Person

1 mention

received no comments in opposition to the requests. Due to the original applicant modifying their · Person

1 mention

received no comments in support or opposition · Person

1 mention

received no comments. Letter of · Person

1 mention

received no comments. On October · Person

1 mention

received no comments on the proposed project at the time of writing of this staff report. · Person

1 mention

received no concerns from relevant municipalities. · Person

1 mention

received no inquiries about the project. · Person

1 mention

received no letters · Person

1 mention

received no letters of opposition · Person

1 mention

received no letters of opposition or · Person

1 mention

received no letters of support or opposition to the request. · Person

1 mention

received no opposition to the request. · Person

1 mention

received no opposition to the request from the · Person

1 mention

received no opposition to the request. The applicant did · Person

1 mention

received no opposition to this · Person

1 mention

received no opposition to this case. · Person

1 mention