Entity Search

Find developers, law firms, planning firms, and other entities mentioned across public meetings.

37491 results found.

was given two options. · Person
1 mention
was granted a Conditional Use Permit for 180 · Person
1 mention
was granted a waiver on the pre-application meeting and filed · Person
1 mention
was great. The experience · Person
1 mention
was happy with staff’s presentation. · Person
1 mention
was held · Person
1 mention
was held on · Person
1 mention
Washington PUD) (Companion Case · Person
1 mention
was hired to help with the hiring · Person
1 mention
was hopeful more housing units would become available because of · Person
1 mention
was ill and was unable to find a replacement in time to attend the hearing on January 15th. · Person
1 mention
was in a downward spiral. Burnout hit hard. · Person
1 mention
was in agreement for the speaker use hours match those of the live entertainment hours. · Person
1 mention
was in agreement with that statement. CHAIR WEIGHT noted that there was still six · Person
1 mention
was in attendance until 6:30 p.m. · Person
1 mention
was in communication with · Person
1 mention
was informed that the installation of the plaque at Barrio Park would need to · Person
1 mention
was informed that the proposed home exceeds the maximum height for this · Person
1 mention
was initially concerned over the proposed · Person
1 mention
was initially proposing to · Person
1 mention
was in no way breaking away from the process in any · Person
1 mention
was in the compliance process. Mr. · Person
1 mention
was in the Navajo Nation at the time of this meeting to do oral history · Person
1 mention
was in the process of finalizing text amendment language · Person
1 mention
was invited to the online · Person
1 mention
was involved in the ReinventPHX process and the · Person
1 mention
was issued an 80-houf unpaid disciplinary suspension. Petitioner · Person
1 mention
was judged responsible for the violation and imposed a $500 · Person
1 mention
was later informed that the Glendale Historical Society · Person
1 mention
was located on the adjacent · Person
1 mention
was looking · Person
1 mention
was looking at automation via wireless/cell phone so that residents · Person
1 mention
was looking at other needs as well and are evaluating all options. · Person
1 mention
was looking at providing separated bike lanes on one of the · Person
1 mention
was looking for additional feedback regarding what · Person
1 mention
was looking for an action on the General Plan Update · Person
1 mention
was looking for consensus to put more details together on each of the · Person
1 mention
was looking into developing an apprenticeship program to · Person
1 mention
was looking to identify locations that would give · Person
1 mention
was made · Person
1 mention
was made aware of concern from one resident in opposition in regards to traffic and · Person
1 mention
was made aware that the DCCP representative could not come so · Person
1 mention
was made aware the proposed location · Person
1 mention
was made with Ms. Reytor · Person
1 mention
was made with Ms. Reytor via telephone. It was learned that she was not in town · Person
1 mention
was made with the property owner’s son who requested additional time. Information for · Person
1 mention
was misquoted. The reporter was contacted regarding the misquote and the reporter stated · Person
1 mention
was necessary to · Person
1 mention
was needed. · Person
1 mention
was not able to get a · Person
1 mention