Entity Search

would need to apply for a demolition permit. If · Person

1 mention

would need to come back to Council for guidance on park · Person

1 mention

would need to examine flood control areas or ownership of · Person

1 mention

would need to gauge several variables to consider · Person

1 mention

would need to get authorization not just from WSD but from all utility companies if · Person

1 mention

would need to have public health · Person

1 mention

would need to identify other strategies to · Person

1 mention

would need to maintain the title in their name and live in the home for a certain time period · Person

1 mention

would need to obtain a · Person

1 mention

would need to relocated Arizona · Person

1 mention

would not agree to a continuance and the · Person

1 mention

would not be able to enjoy their property with the same amenities afforded othersin their · Person

1 mention

would not be able to keep the sheep due to · Person

1 mention

would not be supportive of this application if the · Person

1 mention

would note that a super-majority vote has not been · Person

1 mention

would note that it appears per both the site plan and aerials that the site has four driveways · Person

1 mention

would note that legally continuing this use would require · Person

1 mention

would note that the 20 year validity period · Person

1 mention

would note that the proposed deviations to · Person

1 mention

would note that the required ADA spaces are · Person

1 mention

would note the above table differs from what was proposed by the applicant in the original · Person

1 mention

would note this application was filed under the prior iteration of the MCZO. Under those · Person

1 mention

would notify the Street · Person

1 mention

would not need additional funding. · Person

1 mention

would  not need to be considering  such  a large space of · Person

1 mention

would not respond · Person

1 mention

would only need · Person

1 mention

would only pursue solar panel or shade kiosk options. · Person

1 mention

would open · Person

1 mention

would partner with · Person

1 mention

would partner with community leaders in the City. · Person

1 mention

would pay a lease rate on · Person

1 mention

would plan for a continued decline in lifeguard · Person

1 mention

would plan to launch the · Person

1 mention

· First appearance: 2023-12-13

would prepare and present one next year. · Person

1 mention

would prepare informational materials outlining parking · Person

1 mention

would prepare the recommendations for a future · Person

1 mention

would present some pros and cons to the issue and some options · Person

1 mention

would present the revised plan at the Oct. 27 · Person

1 mention

would proactively engage with property owners and · Person

1 mention

would proceed if they did not reach an agreement · Person

1 mention

would propose an amendment to the November 2024 lease agreement to cover the lease · Person

1 mention

would propose an amount due from the developer that would represent the property · Person

1 mention

· First appearance: 2022-11-15

would propose. Ms. DiMartino stated that she · Person

1 mention

would propose the McKinley lot be a land lease Request for · Person

1 mention

would propose the use if it was not needed in the area. He stated that he would be · Person

1 mention

would provide · Person

1 mention

would provide a detailed maintenance · Person

1 mention

would provide a digital copy to all the board members. · Person

1 mention

would provide details on the proposal. · Person

1 mention