← Back to meetings

Meeting phoenix-pdf-2021-02-17 complete

2021-02-17 · Formal Meeting

Items: 69

Formal Meeting

View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Summary
This item transmits recommendations from the Mayor and Council for appointment or
reappointment to City Boards and Commissions.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Mayor's Office.




Page 13
ATTACHMENT A




To: City Council Date: February 17, 2021
From: Mayor Kate Gallego

Subject: BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS – APPOINTEES

The purpose of this memo is to provide recommendations for appointments to the
following Boards and Commissions:

Alhambra Village Planning Committee

Councilwoman Betty Guardado recommends the following individuals for appointment:

Jim DeGraffenreid
Mr. DeGraffenreid is an Instructional Professional at Arizona State University and a
resident of District 5. He fills a vacancy for a term to expire November 19, 2021.

Maurita Harris
Ms. Harris is a Project Manager and Architect III at PHX Architecture and a resident of
District 5. She fills a vacancy for a term to expire November 19, 2022.

Desert View Village Planning Committee

Councilman Jim Waring recommends the following individual for appointment:

Michelle Santoro
Ms. Santoro is a Senior Planner at Earl & Curley and a resident of District 2. She fills a
vacancy for a term to expire November 19, 2022.

Library Advisory Board

I recommend the following individual for appointment:

Anne Thorne
Ms. Thorne is a Realtor at HomeSmart Real Estate and a resident of District 4. She fills
a vacancy for a term to expire February 17, 2024.




Page 14
Sister Cities Commission

I recommend the following individual for appointment:

Karl Obergh
Mr. Obergh is the President of Ritoch-Powell & Associates and a resident of District 7.
He replaces Anne Thorne for a term to expire June 30, 2023.

South Mountain Village Planning Committee

Councilman Sal DiCiccio recommends the following individual for appointment:

Trent Marchuk
Mr. Marchuk works in Technology Operations at Charles Schwab and is a resident of
District 8. He fills a vacancy for a term to expire November 19, 2021.

Councilmember Carlos Garcia recommends the following individual for appointment:

Emma Viera
Ms. Viera is the Executive Director of Unlimited Potential and a resident of District 3.
She replaces Dolores Levesque for a term to expire November 19, 2022.




Page 15



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Spice Sea

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 131298.

Summary

Applicant
Yong Huang, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
3345 W. Greenway Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 1

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Feb. 20, 2021.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations


Page 16

on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Lychee Kitchen (Series 12)
23450 N. 19th Ave., Ste. 103, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 9
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have been in restaurant management for 20 years and I have completed all liquor
training courses.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“The Spice Sea is a great new seafood boiler restaurant that is family and budget
friendly. It will be a great addition to the neighborhood.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Spice Sea
Liquor License Map - Spice Sea

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 17
Liquor License Data: SPICE SEA
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Liquor Store 9 3 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 2 1

Hotel 11 1 0

Restaurant 12 5 3


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 40.98 57.43 83.43

Violent Crimes 7.43 8.33 11.88

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 62 134

Total Violations 105 193




Page 18
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1041001 1290 40 % 21 % 11 %

1041004 1847 89 % 14 % 9%

1042022 2649 87 % 0% 15 %

1042072 1463 95 % 11 % 5%

1042073 1396 8% 4% 34 %

1042263 658 27 % 17 % 37 %

1042264 1538 92 % 7% 15 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 19
Liquor License Map: SPICE SEA
3345 W GREENWAY RD




Ü
Date: 12/30/2020
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 20



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
***REQUEST TO CONTINUE (SEE ATTACHED MEMO)*** Liquor License - Special
Event - M.U.S.I.C. Foundation of Arizona, Inc.

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Bradley Laughlin

Location
5410 E. High St.
Council District: 2

Function
Food and Music Festival

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
March 27, 2021 - 2:00 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. / 2,450 attendees
March 28, 2021 - 12:00 Noon to 8:30 p.m. / 2,450 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting that approval of this application is
based on criteria set forth in Title IV of the Arizona Revised Statutes and noting that
the applicant has agreed to adhere to the implementation and enforcement of safety
precautions consistent with the guidance issued by both the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention and the Arizona Department of Health Services.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 21



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Dickey's Barbecue

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 132095.

Summary

Applicant
Theresa Morse, Agent

License Type
Series 7 - Beer and Wine Bar

Location
402 E. Greenway Pkwy., Ste. 2
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 3

This request is for a new liquor license for a beer and wine bar. This location was
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is March 1, 2021.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.


Page 22


Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“The owners have experience in owning and operating liquor licensed establishments.
The existing liquor establishments have had no violations with city, state or county.
Their establishments are geared towards the community by providing a clean and
healthy environment for families. Their other businesses average at least 95 percent
food sales. Liquor law training for all staff is conducted on a regular basis to ensure
compliance with current liquor laws.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This location has been operating without a liquor license for approximately 3 years.
Customers have inquired about service of alcohol to complement the service of food.
Therefore, the ownership decided to apply for a liquor license for the location.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Dickey's Barbecue
Liquor License Map - Dickey's Barbecue

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 23
Liquor License Data: DICKEY'S BARBECUE
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 1 1

Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 0

Liquor Store 9 5 3

Beer and Wine Store 10 8 5

Restaurant 12 19 14


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 42.36 112.79 262.73

Violent Crimes 7.67 14.14 31.52

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 60 11

Total Violations 100 16




Page 24
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1036043 1058 42 % 16 % 4%

1036111 1396 66 % 14 % 3%

1036112 1335 87 % 10 % 0%

1036121 649 0% 41 % 18 %

1036122 1023 87 % 8% 12 %

1036123 1542 94 % 8% 0%

1036124 1189 0% 19 % 32 %

6189001 1603 54 % 10 % 6%

6189005 1013 0% 37 % 22 %

6191001 2198 0% 11 % 23 %

6192002 1223 0% 15 % 29 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 25
Liquor License Map: DICKEY'S BARBECUE
402 E GREENWAY PKWY




Ü
Date: 1/12/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 26



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - 7-Eleven #20622F

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 126664.

Summary

Applicant
Amarpal Hayer, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
646 W. Indian School Road
Zoning Classification: C-2 SAUMSO
Council District: 4

This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that does not sell gas.
This location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with
an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Feb. 21, 2021.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of


Page 27

Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have worked in 7-Eleven stores for many years, as both a sales associate and
Assistant Manager and so I am familiar with the operation and management of 7-
Eleven stores. I have completed an extensive corporate training program regarding the
operation of 7-Eleven stores and have completed basic and management liquor
training by an authorized trained, as required by Arizona liquor laws.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This location has been a 7-Eleven store since 2007. I will operate the store in the
same responsible manner and with the high standards required of 7-Eleven
franchisees. I plan to continue to provide quality service to the neighbors of this store,
and to the general public which they have enjoyed and have come to rely on for many
years.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - 7-Eleven #20622F
Liquor License Map - 7-Eleven #20622F

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 28
Liquor License Data: 7-ELEVEN #20622F
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 11 6

Beer and Wine Bar 7 3 1

Liquor Store 9 4 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 10 6

Hotel 11 1 1

Restaurant 12 20 6


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 40.98 142.09 157.32

Violent Crimes 7.43 24.81 29.61

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 62 123

Total Violations 105 225




Page 29
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1089011 988 36 % 15 % 30 %

1089012 1297 31 % 23 % 54 %

1089013 956 82 % 4% 8%

1089024 1278 46 % 9% 21 %

1104001 1724 53 % 6% 33 %

1104004 1344 49 % 16 % 20 %

1105011 551 49 % 20 % 14 %

1105012 1249 13 % 23 % 11 %

1171001 2126 10 % 15 % 10 %

1171002 703 57 % 27 % 12 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 30
Liquor License Map: 7-ELEVEN #20622F
646 W INDIAN SCHOOL RD




Ü
Date: 12/31/2020
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 31



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - OG Liquor

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 09070527.

Summary

Applicant
JJ Bazzi, Agent

License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store

Location
4820 N. 27th Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 4

This request is for an ownership transfer of a liquor license for a liquor store. This
location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an
interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is March 1, 2021.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the


Page 32

State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Chevron (Series 10)
3501 W. Camelback Road, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 69
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“In the last 5 years I've owned and operated another business which along with this
one I will continue to operate as a responsible retailer abiding and always following all
the rules and regulations.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“I will bring additional jobs and revenue to the area along with providing a convenient
location to the residents in the area with no means of transportation.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - OG Liquor
Liquor License Map - OG Liquor

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.



Page 33
Liquor License Data: OG LIQUOR
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 1 1

Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 0

Liquor Store 9 6 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 15 5

Hotel 11 1 1

Restaurant 12 7 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 42.36 140.65 148.51

Violent Crimes 7.67 48.24 50.10

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 60 151

Total Violations 100 261




Page 34
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1072011 2335 21 % 25 % 49 %

1072012 2127 13 % 9% 63 %

1073003 737 75 % 37 % 24 %

1073004 2614 23 % 5% 31 %

1090011 1552 19 % 22 % 42 %

1090012 3369 0% 11 % 59 %

1090022 2291 15 % 18 % 63 %

1090033 1600 22 % 13 % 68 %

1091011 1722 69 % 0% 34 %

1091012 2067 85 % 10 % 30 %

1091022 2966 78 % 14 % 50 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 35
Liquor License Map: OG LIQUOR
4820 N 27TH AVE




Ü
Date: 1/8/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 36



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Chevron

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 131418.

Summary

Applicant
JJ Bazzi, Agent

License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store

Location
3501 W. Camelback Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 5

This request is for a new liquor license for a liquor store. This location is currently
licensed for liquor sales with a Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store, liquor license.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Feb. 21, 2021.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations


Page 37

on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Chevron (Series 10)
3501 W. Camelback Road, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 69
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“In the last 5 years and currently operating as a responsible retailer that abides and
always follow all the rules and regulations.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“I will bring additional jobs and revenue to the area along with providing a convenient
location to the residents in the area with no means of transportation.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Chevron
Liquor License Map - Chevron

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 38
Liquor License Data: CHEVRON
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 1 0

Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 2

Liquor Store 9 1 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 8 3

Restaurant 12 5 4


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 42.36 105.59 99.89

Violent Crimes 7.67 29.06 34.92

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 60 190

Total Violations 100 320




Page 39
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1071021 1531 50 % 17 % 42 %

1071022 2275 45 % 20 % 45 %

1071023 2082 32 % 14 % 38 %

1072011 2335 21 % 25 % 49 %

1091011 1722 69 % 0% 34 %

1091021 2115 47 % 14 % 46 %

1092001 1455 52 % 10 % 45 %

1092002 1665 36 % 30 % 46 %

1092003 1593 11 % 26 % 32 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 40
Liquor License Map: CHEVRON
3501 W CAMELBACK RD




Ü
Date: 1/4/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 41



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - West Side Smoke Shop

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 132070.

Summary

Applicant
Sarkhdon Yonathan, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
2709 W. Northern Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 5

This request is for a new liquor license for a tobacco shop. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This location
requires a Use Permit to allow package liquor sales.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is March 1, 2021.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of


Page 42

Arizona.

Public Opinion
Four letters protesting the issuance of this license have been received and are on file
in the Office of the City Clerk. The letters are from Lane Avenue Block Watch, North
Glen Square Neighborhood Association, Alta Vista Neighborhood Block Watch and
Ocotillo Glen Neighborhood Association. There are concerns regarding the proximity to
a nearby school, and they feel the need and convenience of the community is already
met with the existing two licenses that are directly across the street from the proposed
location. There are also concerns the issuance of the license in a high crime area will
create instability within the neighborhood.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I an a responsible member of society and have never been arrested or convicted of
any crimes. I have previouly owned a liquor store and managed the sales within all
local and fereral regulations. I have registered for all required classes and will comply
with all regulations to insure all sales will be legal. I plan on being present and involved
in all daily activities pertaining to the business and daily sales.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We will provide personalized service to members of the community to ensure their
grocery needs are met with daily provision.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances. Staff gave careful consideration to the
protest letters received, however after reviewing the application in its entirety staff is
recommending approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - West Side Smoke Shop
Liquor License Map - West Side Smoke Shop




Page 43

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 44
Liquor License Data: WEST SIDE SMOKE SHOP
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 2 0

Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 1

Liquor Store 9 3 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 7 3

Restaurant 12 6 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 42.36 132.32 152.97

Violent Crimes 7.67 31.90 42.99

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 60 115

Total Violations 100 239




Page 45
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1055011 1055 38 % 6% 59 %

1055012 1442 0% 11 % 38 %

1056012 1895 76 % 6% 27 %

1056021 2042 80 % 0% 26 %

1059001 1697 50 % 0% 42 %

1059003 1609 59 % 5% 25 %

1060011 1487 31 % 17 % 50 %

1060021 1678 27 % 14 % 27 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 46
Liquor License Map: WEST SIDE SMOKE SHOP
2709 W NORTHERN AVE




Ü
Date: 1/7/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 47



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Carioca Shell #67

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 131395.

Summary

Applicant
Howard Magee, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
6675 W. Lower Buckeye Road
Zoning Classification: C-1 (Approved C-2)
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that sells gas. This
location was not previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim
permit. This location requires a Use Permit to allow package liquor sales. This
business is currently under construction with plans to open in March 2021.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Feb. 20, 2021.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona


Page 48

This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am the agent/applicant for approx. 40 C-Store locations for the Carioca Company.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“The Carioca Company operates 40 C-Store locations in Arizona. The Carioca
Company has operated C-Store / gas stations in Arizona / Phoenix metro area for over
40 years.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Carioca Shell #67
Liquor License Map - Carioca Shell #67

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 49
Liquor License Data: CARIOCA SHELL #67
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Liquor Store 9 1 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 1 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 40.98 27.97 34.92

Violent Crimes 7.43 5.30 6.47

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 62 38

Total Violations 105 43


Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1125102 931 93 % 10 % 39 %

1125113 1068 84 % 1% 50 %

1125131 3959 74 % 10 % 14 %

1125132 0 0% 0% 0%

1125133 2068 77 % 9% 28 %

1125134 2479 75 % 16 % 0%

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 50
Liquor License Map: CARIOCA SHELL #67
6675 W LOWER BUCKEYE RD




Ü
Date: 12/31/2020
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 51



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Paddock Lounge

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 131391.

Summary

Applicant
Brian Petersen, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
2425 S. 21st St.
Zoning Classification: A-2 RSIO AIO
Council District: 8

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Feb. 20, 2021.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.


Page 52


Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am a businessman who has operated and managed 35 separate K1 Speed kart
racing facilities across the U.S. since the first one was opened in Carlsbad, CA in
2005. This business is a safe and popular entertainment activity which occupies
between 40,000 sf and 75,000 sf leased spaces, depending upon the center. I employ
over 1,000 employees successfully. During this period, I have had no legal or criminal
issues. No reasons exist which would disqualify me from holding a liquor license.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“The proposed addition of beer & wine to the concession area restaurant (Paddock
Lounge) will improve the environment and experience of K1 Speed clientele. This
clientele is primarily high-end corporate users. The facility provides a clean, upscale
entertainment center as an alternative to expensive corporate retreats or motivational
presentations. The alcohol license will allow for a minor increase in tax revenue
generated. No schools or churches are located within the area which could be a
conflict.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Paddock Lounge
Liquor License Map - Paddock Lounge

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 53
Liquor License Data: PADDOCK LOUNGE
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Wholesaler 4 3 2

Bar 6 1 0

Conveyance 8 1 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 1 0

Restaurant 12 1 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 40.98 19.61 14.64

Violent Crimes 7.43 1.48 0.74

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 62 9

Total Violations 105 13


Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1138021 0 0% 0% 0%

1172001 823 25 % 17 % 70 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 54
Liquor License Map: PADDOCK LOUNGE
2425 S 21ST ST




Ü
Date: 12/30/2020
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 55



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
(CONTINUED FROM FEB. 3, 2021) - Liquor License - Lucky Market

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 09070322.

Summary

Applicant
Geeta Bhatt, Agent

License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store

Location
16401 N. Cave Creek Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 2

This request is for an ownership transfer of a liquor license for a liquor store. This
location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an
interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application was Jan. 12, 2021. However, the
applicant has submitted a written request for more time.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.




Page 56

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Jerry's Drive In Liquor (Series 9)
1217 S. Rural Road, Tempe
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: In October 2017, a fine of $750 was paid for selling liquor to
an intoxicated or disorderly person. In October 2018, a fine of $750 was paid for failure
to request ID from underage buyer and for selling, giving or furnishing underage
person with alcohol. In November 2019, a fine of $750 was paid for employee
consuming on duty and off-sale open container on premises.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have the experience since 2002 in the liquor business. It is a good community store
and I have ability to handle the business.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“I should get the license because the commity is safe to sell liquor and it is a good
small store and it is convenient to the community.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends disapproval of this application based on a Police Department
recommendation of disapproval. The Police Department disapproval is based on
concerns regarding multiple recent violations demonstrating a lack of control over
another liquor establishment operated by the same applicant. The applicant has not
demonstrated the capability, qualification and reliability to hold and control a liquor
license.



Page 57


Attachments
Liquor License Data - Lucky Market
Liquor License Map - Lucky Market
Liquor License Police Department Recommendation - Lucky Market

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 58
Liquor License Data: LUCKY MARKET
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 4 1

Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 2

Liquor Store 9 5 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 9 6

Restaurant 12 12 8


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 40.27 75.71 118.04

Violent Crimes 7.26 14.57 20.16

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 61 89

Total Violations 103 174




Page 59
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1033051 1180 47 % 29 % 35 %

1033052 2333 59 % 9% 30 %

1033061 921 18 % 28 % 32 %

1033062 2272 17 % 22 % 37 %

1036061 1067 84 % 15 % 13 %

1036063 2174 78 % 13 % 25 %

6194001 1068 54 % 32 % 9%

6195003 2362 65 % 14 % 8%

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 60
Liquor License Map: LUCKY MARKET
16401 N CAVE CREEK RD




Ü
Date: 11/19/2020
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 61
Page 62



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Tennessee Grill

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 125380.

Summary

Applicant
Phillip Ladiser, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
4220 W. Summit Walk Court, Ste. 1202
Zoning Classification: C-2 PCD
Council District: 1

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit. This
business is currently being remodeled.

The 60-day limit for processing this application was Jan. 9, 2021. However, the
applicant has submitted a written request for more time.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona


Page 63

This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have worked in the food sales industry for over 10 years. I have completed the Title
4 basic and management liquor law training courses with ALIC. All employees will be
required to attend the liquor class.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This restaurant has been open for several years. I would like to continue to offer my
patrons great food and beverages while dining at the Tennessee Grill.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends disapproval of this application based on a Police Department
recommendation for disapproval. The Police Department disapproval is based on
concerns of undisclosed funding and significant discrepancies between the application
and statements made during the police interview. The applicant has not demonstrated
the capability, qualifications and reliability to hold and control a liquor license.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Tennessee Grill
Liquor License Map - Tennessee Grill
Liquor License Police Department Recommendation - Tennessee Grill

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 64
Liquor License Data: TENNESSEE GRILL
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 1 1

Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 1

Liquor Store 9 1 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 2 2

Restaurant 12 1 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 40.27 11.25 41.50

Violent Crimes 7.26 0.55 1.69

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 61 1

Total Violations 103 2


Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

6100003 1546 54 % 25 % 3%

6100004 2234 70 % 6% 4%

6102003 1703 53 % 21 % 5%

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 65
Liquor License Map: TENNESSEE GRILL
4220 W SUMMIT WALK CT




Ü
Date: 11/13/2020
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 66
.




Page 67
Page 68



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - El Pueblo Restaurant

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 128136.

Summary

Applicant
Amanda Arriaza, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
2270 N. 75th Ave., Ste. 101
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application was Feb. 1, 2021. However, the
applicant submitted a written request for more time.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of


Page 69

Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I Amanda consider myself a very responsible, honest person with good moral
standings, and I believe that I have the ability to handle a liquor license.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“They will have more options for alcoholic beverage with their meals.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends disapproval of this application based on a Police Department
recommendation for disapproval. The Police Department disapproval is based on
possible hidden ownership concerns, falsifying information on both City and State
questionnaires, and concerns associated with financing of the business. The applicant
has not demonstrated the capability, qualifications and reliability to hold and control a
liquor license.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - El Pueblo Restaurant
Liquor License Map - El Pueblo Restaurant
Liquor License Police Department Recommendation - El Pueblo Restaurant

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 70
Liquor License Data: EL PUEBLO RESTAURANT
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 1 0

Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 1

Liquor Store 9 3 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 4 1

Restaurant 12 17 11


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 42.36 181.15 278.76

Violent Crimes 7.67 26.56 25.47

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 60 87

Total Violations 100 143


Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1125033 1448 67 % 6% 8%

1125034 1913 70 % 12 % 32 %

1125091 1905 0% 15 % 22 %

1125092 1564 47 % 23 % 9%

1125093 2841 0% 14 % 49 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 71
Liquor License Map: EL PUEBLO RESTAURANT
2270 N 75TH AVE




Ü
Date: 12/7/2020
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75




PAYMENT ORDINANCE (Ordinance S-47292) (Items 14-25)
Ordinance S-47292 is a request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse funds, up to amounts indicated below, for the purpose of
paying vendors, contractors, claimants and others, and providing
additional payment authority under certain existing city contracts. This
section also requests continuing payment authority, up to amounts
indicated below, for the following contracts, contract extensions and/or
bids awarded. As indicated below, some items below require payment
pursuant to Phoenix City Code Section 42-13.

14 American Association of Airport Executives
For $59,375.00 in payment authority for 2021 American Association of
Airport Executives (AAAE) Federal Affairs membership dues for the
Aviation Department. The AAAE advocates on behalf of airports and
works to prevent shifting of costs and federal responsibilities to airports,
ensuring that unfunded mandates are not imposed. It is the primary
interface with elected officials and regulatory agencies on issues affecting
airports across the country. AAAE provides important information, alerts,
updates and insight on legislation and proposed regulations, security
policy, and congressional hearing reports.

15 PFM Financial Advisors, LLC
For $75,000.00 in payment authority for a new contract, entered on or
about Feb. 20, 2021 for a term of five years for the Finance Department.
The contract will provide financial advisory services to the Public Transit
and Street Transportation departments for work related to the
development and maintenance of long-term financial planning models
necessary for future financings. The vendor was selected from the City of
Phoenix Financial Advisor Qualified Vendor List established through
RFQ-2017FIN-003.




Page 76

16 Settlement of Claim(s) Lucero v. City of Phoenix
To make payment of up to $36,000.00 in settlement of claim(s) in Lucero
v. City of Phoenix, CV2019-010686, 18-0727-002, AU, BI, for the
Finance Department pursuant to Phoenix City Code chapter 42. This is a
settlement of a bodily injury claim arising from a motor vehicle accident on
July 16, 2018 involving the Police Department.

17 Settlement of Claim(s) Mason v. City of Phoenix
To make payment of up to $100,000.00 in settlement of claim(s) in
Mason v. City of Phoenix, CV2020-053869, 19-0823-001, GL, BI, for the
Finance Department pursuant to Phoenix City Code chapter 42. This is a
settlement of a bodily injury claim arising from a non-vehicular accident
that occurred on Aug. 28, 2019.

18 Settlement of Claim(s) Garcia v. City of Phoenix
To make payment of up to $60,000.00 in settlement of claim(s) in Garcia
v. City of Phoenix, CV2019-002195, 18-0246-001, GL, BI, for the
Finance Department pursuant to Phoenix City Code chapter 42. This is a
settlement of a bodily injury claim arising from a non-vehicular accident
that occurred on March 10, 2018.

19 Settlement of Claim(s) Hinds v. City of Phoenix
To make payment of up to $40,000.00 in settlement of claim(s) Hinds v.
Department pursuant to Phoenix City Code chapter 42. This is a
settlement of a bodily injury claim arising from a motor vehicle accident on
Sept. 22, 2018, involving the Police Department.

20 Settlement of Claim(s) Foster v. City of Phoenix
To make payment up to $52,500.00 in settlement of claim(s) in Foster v.
Department pursuant to Phoenix City Code chapter 42. This is a
settlement of a bodily injury claim arising from a motor vehicle accident on
Oct. 12, 2019, involving the Police Department.

21 Settlement of Claim(s) Yakoo v. City of Phoenix
To make payment of up to $43,550.00 in settlement of claim(s) in Yakoo
v. City of Phoenix, 20-0080-001, GL, PD, for the Finance Department


Page 77

pursuant to Phoenix City Code chapter 42. This is a settlement for a
property damage claim arising from a sewer backup on July 14, 2020.

22 Arizona State University
For $65,000.00 in payment authority for Contract 119092 for the annual
operating and maintenance fees for the Downtown Phoenix Civic Space
A.E. England Building, which is paid to Arizona Board of Regents on
behalf of Arizona State University, for the Parks and Recreation
Department.

23 Arizona Generator Technology, Inc., doing business as
Gen-Tech
For $13,195.41 in payment authority to repair a failed generator located at
the Fire Academy, for the Public Works Department. The generator
provides backup power to the training facility for emergency response
teams, including safety training. The generator was diagnosed with
needing a new electronic control module. The part can only be purchased,
replaced, and calibrated by Arizona Generator Technology, the original
equipment manufacturer in the area.

24 Ferguson US Holdings Inc., doing business as
Ferguson Enterprises, LLC.
For $58,230.00 in payment authority for a one-time purchase of three
Quick View Pole Cameras for the Water Services Department (WSD).
The equipment will allow WSD staff to inspect sanitary sewer structures
including manholes, vaults, wet wells and other confined space structures
safely throughout the City by removing staff from the potential exposure to
hazardous gasses. The equipment will also allow staff to quickly and
efficiently collect videos and pictures of the structures which can be used
for rehabilitation or repair.

25 Central Arizona Water Conservation District doing
business as Central Arizona Project
For $26,993.00 in payment authority for a land use license necessary for
the ongoing right to use Central Arizona Project land and maintain three
underground sewer lines along Cave Creek Road for the five-year term of
2016-2021 for the Water Services Department.



Page 78



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
***REQUEST TO WITHDRAW (SEE ATTACHED MEMO)*** (CONTINUED FROM
FEB. 3, 2021) - 2015-2020 Consolidated Plan's 2019 Annual Action Plan CARES
Act Amendment (Ordinance S-47290)

Request City Council approval of a Substantial Amendment to the 2015-2020
Consolidated Plan's 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan to include a second Emergency
Solutions Grant (ESG-CV2) allocation authorized by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and
Economic Security Act (CARES Act), Public Law 116-136, enacted March 27, 2020, for
the specific purpose of preventing, preparing for, and responding to the Coronavirus
(COVID-19) public health crisis. Further request authorization for the City Treasurer to
accept and the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Summary
The 2015-2020 Consolidated Plan's 2019 Annual Action Plan defines how the City's
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnership
(HOME), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and Housing Opportunities for Persons
with AIDS (HOPWA) funds will be used to address the priorities and goals outlined in
the five-year Consolidated Plan.

A previous substantial amendment to the 2019 Annual Action Plan was completed for
the first round of the CARES Act ESG funding in May of 2020 (ESG-CV1). This second
substantial amendment is to allocate $19,212,248 provided to the City in the second
round of ESG funding (ESG-CV2) authorized by the CARES Act to support the City's
effort to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The following summarizes the second ESG-CV2 allocation and the proposed activities
that will be funded to address the growing effects of the public health crisis:

ESG-CV2: $19,212,248
$19,212,248 will be used to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the COVID-19
pandemic, focusing on individuals and families who are experiencing homelessness or
receiving homeless assistance, and to support homelessness prevention activities to
mitigate the impacts of COVID-19. The following eligible activities will be funded with
this allocation:



Page 79

· Street Outreach: $1,922,285 will be used to fund essential services necessary to
reach out to unsheltered homeless individuals and families and connect them with
emergency shelter, housing or other critical services.

· Emergency Shelter: $4,253,669 will be used to extend temporary shelter to
vulnerable individuals who are receiving homeless assistance.

· Homelessness/Eviction Prevention: $3,192,259 will be used to support additional
homelessness prevention activities.

· Rapid Re-Housing: $7,922,810 will be used to support additional homelessness
assistance activities.

· Administration, Planning and Coordination: $1,921,225 will be used for the
purposes of program administration, planning and coordination.

Further City Council action will be required to enter into any new contracts, or to
modify any existing contracts, with service providers for services funded under these
eligible activities. If any additional federal funds are provided, a subsequent substantial
amendment will be brought to council for approval.

Procurement Information
Services may be procured, as needed, by utilizing procurement practices in
accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10 to implement and administer U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funded programs intended to
prevent, prepare for, and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Financial Impact
These activities are funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development through the Coronavirus Aid, and Economic Security Act (CARES) Act.
There is no impact to the General Fund.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
On May 6, 2020, City Council authorized a Substantial Amendment to the 2015-2020
Consolidated Plan's 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan to include the first release of
allocations and waivers authorized by the CARES Act.

On Jan. 21, 2021, the Land Use and Livability Subcommittee recommended City
Council approval of this item.



Page 80


Public Outreach
As part of the CARES Act, HUD approved an expedited public outreach process that
allows the flexibility to institute more streamlined requirements to address immediate
needs regarding to the Coronavirus. The HUD process includes the following:

· The reduction of the 30-day public comment period and the implementation of a
public comment period of no less than five days in an effort to expedite the
Consolidated Plan Substantial Amendment process and allow the City to respond
as quickly as possible to the immediate needs in the community.

· The elimination of in-person public hearings and the implementation of virtual public
hearings when 1) national and/or local health authorities recommend social
distancing and limiting public gatherings for public health reasons, and 2) virtual
hearing provide reasonable notification and access for citizens in accordance with
Phoenix's certifications, timely responses from local officials and to all citizen
questions and issues, and public access to all questions and responses.

The comment period for this substantial amendment was open from Jan. 18 to Jan. 22,
2021. The virtual public hearing took place on Jan. 22, 2021.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Neighborhood
Services and Human Services Departments.




Page 81

To: Inger Erickson Date: February 10, 2021
Deputy City Manager

From: Spencer J. Sel �
Neighborhood es Director

Subject: WITHDRAW ITEM #26 ON THE FEBRUARY 17, 2021 FORMAL
AGENDA REGARDING THE 2015-2020 CONSOLIDATED PLAN'S
2019 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN CARES ACT AMENDMENT.


This memo requests that Item#26 regarding the 2015-2020 Consolidated Plan's
Annual Action Plan CARES Act Amendment be withdrawn from the February 17,
2021 Formal Agenda. This continued item will be replaced with a new item that
also addresses the City's second round of CARES Act Community Development
Block Grant funds.
L

Approved: L
��
Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager




Page 82



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
2015-2020 Consolidated Plan's 2019 Annual Action Plan CARES Act Amendment
(Ordinance S-47330)

Request City Council approval of a Substantial Amendment to the 2015-2020
Consolidated Plan's 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan to include a second Emergency
Solutions Grant (ESG-CV2) and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG-CV2)
allocations, and to amend the first round of Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG-CV1) authorized by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act
(CARES Act), Public Law 116-136, enacted March 27, 2020, for the specific purpose of
preventing, preparing for, and responding to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) public health
crisis. Further request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept and the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Summary
The 2015-2020 Consolidated Plan's 2019 Annual Action Plan defines how the City's
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnership
(HOME), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and Housing Opportunities for Persons
with AIDS (HOPWA) funds will be used to address the priorities and goals outlined in
the five-year Consolidated Plan.

A previous substantial amendment to the 2019 Annual Action Plan was completed for
the first round of the CARES Act ESG and CDBG funding in May of 2020 (ESG-CV1
and CDBG-CV1). This second substantial amendment is to allocate $19,212,248 of
ESG funds (ESG-CV2) and $14,096,369 of CDBG funds (CDBG-CV2) provided to the
City in the second round of funding authorized by the CARES Act, and to amend the
first allocation of CDBG-CV1 to support the City's effort to prevent, prepare for, and
respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The following summarizes the ESG-CV2 and CDBG-CV2 allocations and the proposed
activities that will be funded to address the growing effects of the public health crisis:

ESG-CV2: $19,212,248
$19,212,248 will be used to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the COVID-19
pandemic, focusing on individuals and families who are experiencing homelessness or
receiving homeless assistance, and to support homelessness prevention activities to


Page 83

mitigate the impacts of COVID-19.

The following eligible activities will be funded with this allocation:
· $2,973,199 will be used to expand the beds at Project Haven shelter.
· $2,303,165 will be used to expand Rapid Rehousing for women and families.
· $1,800,000 will be used to expand Rapid Rehousing for men.
· $600,000 will be used for operational costs at the new US Vets shelter.

Additionally, $11,535,884 will be used to fund homeless support in an effort to prevent,
prepare for, and respond to the Coronavirus pandemic amongst individuals and
families who are homeless or receiving homeless assistance; and to support additional
homeless assistance and homeless prevention activities to mitigate the impacts of
COVID-19 as directed by City Council.

CDBG-CV2: $14,096,369
$11,277,095 will be used to fund homeless support in an effort to prevent, prepare for,
and respond to the Coronavirus pandemic amongst individuals and families who are
homeless, receiving homeless assistance; and to support additional homeless
assistance and homeless prevention activities to mitigate the impacts of COVID-19.
Homeless support activities may include public services, public facility improvements,
or strategic acquisition of properties in an effort to address community needs related to
homelessness in response to the national pandemic.

$2,819,274 will be used for the purpose of program administration, planning and
coordination as it relates to the CDBG-CV allocations.

Additionally, $298,445 of uncommitted funds from the first round of CDBG funding will
be added to the $4 million of CDBG-CV1 funds allocated by City Council to fund
homeless support activities.

The aforementioned allocations, as summarized in Attachment A, would allow for
$27,111,423 of ESG-CV2, CDBG-CV1 and CDBG-CV2 funds to be available to fund
homeless support activities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the Coronavirus
pandemic in one of the City's most vulnerable populations through the following:
· $3 million for Human Services Campus operations and/or facility improvements
support.
· $15 million for RFP(s) to fund facility acquisition and/or improvement of up to four
shelters.
· $9.1 million for RFP(s) to support homeless services providers.



Page 84


Further City Council action will be required to enter into any new contracts, or to
modify any existing contracts, with service providers for services funded under these
eligible activities. If any additional federal funds are provided, a subsequent substantial
amendment will be brought to Council for approval.

Procurement Information
Services may be procured, as needed, by utilizing procurement practices in
accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10 to implement and administer U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funded programs intended to
prevent, prepare for, and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Financial Impact
These activities are funded by the HUD through the CARES Act. There is no impact to
the General Fund.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
On May 6, 2020, City Council authorized a Substantial Amendment to the 2015-2020
Consolidated Plan's 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan to include the first release of
allocations and waivers authorized by the CARES Act.

On Jan. 21, 2021, the Land Use and Livability Subcommittee recommended City
Council approval of broad allocations of ESG-CV2 allocations to prevent, prepare for,
and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on individuals and families who are
experiencing homelessness or receiving homeless assistance, and to support
homelessness prevention activities to mitigate the impacts of COVID-19.

Public Outreach
As part of the CARES Act, HUD approved an expedited public outreach process that
allows the flexibility to institute more streamlined requirements to address immediate
needs regarding the Coronavirus. The HUD process includes the following:

· The reduction of the 30-day public comment period and the implementation of a
public comment period of no less than five days in an effort to expedite the
Consolidated Plan Substantial Amendment process and allow the City to respond
as quickly as possible to the immediate needs in the community.

· The elimination of in-person public hearings and the implementation of virtual public
hearings when 1) national and/or local health authorities recommend social
distancing and limiting public gatherings for public health reasons, and 2) virtual


Page 85

hearings provide reasonable notification and access for citizens in accordance with
Phoenix's certifications, timely responses from local officials and to all citizen
questions and issues, and public access to all questions and responses.

The comment period for this substantial amendment will be advertised for two weeks
and open for five days. Additionally, a virtual public hearing will be hosted to receive
comment from the public prior to finalization and submission to HUD.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Neighborhood
Services and Human Services departments.




Page 86
ATTACHMENT A:
CARES Act CDBG and ESG $27,111,423 Summary


Total ESG-CV and CDBG-CV Funding (both rounds) $48,105,259

Total Otherwise Committed/Expended $20,993,836

Total Remaining One-Time Funds Available $27,111,423


Summary:
A total of two rounds of CDBG and ESG allocations were provided to the City of
Phoenix in CARES Act funding. On May 6, 2020, City Council gave direction to staff for
the first-round allocations.

Item 27 from February 3 formal meeting requested to allocate the second round of ESG
funds for general categories and then staff would come back with specifics at a later
date. This item was continued to the February 17 meeting, has been requested to be
withdrawn, and has been replaced with this new item.

This new item for February 17 formal incudes the complete package of round two ESG
($19,212,248) and CDBG ($14,096,369) for a substantial amendment to the annual
action plan, as required by HUD, and reallocate a portion of unspent CDBG round one
funds ($4,298,445). After previous allocations and other commitments mentioned in the
Council Report, $27,111,423 is proposed to be used in the manner outlined below.


Proposed Allocation of $27,111,423 Identified in the Council Item:
 $3M - Human Services Campus operations and/or facility improvement support

 $15M - RFP(s) to fund facility acquisition and/or improvement of up to four
shelters

 $9.1M – RFP to support for homeless services providers




Page 87



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing and Authorizing Amendment to Chapter 14 of the Phoenix City
Code Relating to Taxes (Ordinance G-6808)

Request to hold a public hearing on the request for the following item to authorize an
amendment to Chapter 14 of the Phoenix City Code. An ordinance authorizing the City
Manager, or his designee, to amend Chapter 14 of the Phoenix City Code, where the
model city tax code is maintained, with corresponding statutory model city tax code
amendments approved in 2018 and 2019 by the Municipal Tax Code Commission
(MTCC), which was established by the State Legislature to review and approve all
changes to the local model city tax code. The 2018 and 2019 conforming amendments
align the model city tax code with state statutes. Arizona Revised Statute § 42-6052
(H) requires that the governing bodies of all cities and towns adopt the changes to the
model city tax code adopted by the commission and therefore, the City of Phoenix
must adopt these changes to bring Chapter 14 of the Phoenix City Code into
conformance with State statutes accordingly.

Summary
The Model City Tax Code, adopted in 1987, was a coordinated effort on the part of
Arizona cities to achieve uniformity in tax administration. Consequently, statutory
changes made by the Arizona Legislature during its regular sessions between years
2014 and 2018 required that equivalent changes be incorporated in the local model
city tax code (Attachments A and B). These changes were prepared by the League
of Arizona Cities and Towns in consultation with representatives from Arizona cities,
approved by the business community, and presented before the MTCC. The MTCC
held public hearings and approved adoption of the proposed amendments on Dec. 14,
2018; Feb. 22, 2019; and May 31, 2019. The delay in obtaining MTCC adoption was
due to the need to await final determination of evolving State Transaction Privilege Tax
(TPT) Simplification administrative issues that were clarified through subsequent State
legislature session actions, collaborative deliberation and concurrence with the
business community on complex construction contracting tax issues that required
multiple State legislature session actions to clarify legislative intent, and challenges in
securing the required quorum of 10 non-compensated appointive members, each
restricted to a 3-year term limit, to serve on the commission.




Page 88

Financial Impact
Arizona cities and towns must comply with statutory changes recommended for
incorporation into the model city tax code when approved for adoption by the MTCC
and because the City of Phoenix has been in compliance since then, no fiscal impacts
from City Transaction Privilege Tax revenues - neither increases nor decreases - are
expected to arise from these recommended changes.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Due to the need to maintain uniformity with State statutes and the approval of the
business community, City staff recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed
2018 and 2019 amendments already approved by the Municipal Tax Code
Commission.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Ed Zuercher and the Finance Department.




Page 89
ATTACHMENT A

This document details the various changes incorporated into the local version of the
Model City Tax Code approved by the Municipal Tax Code Commission in public
hearings held in the years 2018 and 2019. These changes are summarized below by
Ordinance Section number, identifying the bills that initiated them, and the statutory
effective dates per item.

The amendments titled “2014-2018 Legislative Actions Amendment” incorporates
several changes to the local version of the Model City Tax Code that relate to statutory
changes made by the legislature during its regular sessions between years 2014 and
2018. These amendments were approved by the Municipal Tax Code Commission in a
public hearing held on Friday, December 14th, 2018.

2014-2018 Legislative Actions Amendments
Section I: Amends Sec. 14-110, Definitions: Income-producing capital equipment.

Legislation (Year: Bill Numbers) – 2015: SB1446; 2016: HB2133, HB2533; 2017:
SB1416

The definition of “income producing capital equipment” is expanded by these four bills.
First, two clauses are amended to ensure that contractors performing maintenance,
repair, replacement, and alteration (MRRA) jobs can purchase otherwise exempt
machinery and equipment for projects involving telecommunications, effective January
1, 2015 (SB1446). Second, add agricultural aircraft such as crop dusters to the list of
exempt farm machinery and equipment, effective retroactively from April 17, 1985
(HB2133). Third, the subsection related to aircraft, navigational and communication
instruments and accessories is expanded to include charter planes, helicopters, and
other air tour operators who are exempt from holding a Federal certificate of public
convenience, effective retroactively from June 1, 1998 (HB2533). Finally, aircraft
exemptions for common carriers are amended to include fractional ownership
scenarios, effective January 1, 2018 (SB1416).


Legislative Bills 2014 - 2018

Effective A.R.S. Section PCC Section
Year Chapter Bill # Date 42-XXXX 14-XXXX Description
Building permit
requirements; create liability
for Retail equivalent on
MRRA used in Prime; clarify
Retail exemptions for
9-467 6004/ Contractors/MRRA; revises
5005/5008.1/5009/ 110/415/415.1/ MRRA to limit "alteration",
2015 4 SB1446 1/1/2015 5010/5061/5075/5159 465/660 etc.
Adds agricultural aircraft
(crop dusters) to exempt
2016 181 HB2133 4/17/1985 5061/5159 110 farm equipment




Page 90
Expands airline exemptions
for charter
aircraft/helicopters by adding
carriers exempt from having
a certificate of public
2016 367 HB2533 6/1/1998 5009/5061/5159 110 convenience
Adds fractional jet ownership
to common carrier
2017 340 SB1416 1/1/2018 5061/5159 110 exemptions


Section II: Amends Sec. 14-410, Amusements, exhibitions, and similar activities.

Legislation (Year: Bill Numbers) – 2016: HB2674; 2018: SB1120

The Amusements classification is amended to add an exemption for a charity run, walk,
swim, bike ride or similar event operated by a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, effective
August 6, 2016 (HB2674). Also, this section adds the exemption for events operated by
groups associated with Major League Baseball or a professional golf tour and edits the
language to limit application of the exemption for groups owned or controlled by a Major
League team, MLB, or a pro golf tour unless they operated such events before 2018,
effective from and after January 1, 2018 (SB1120). Additionally, a long-standing policy
by those cities and towns that have adopted Local Option #H exempting one-on-one
instruction or training as a personal service is added to the code for improved clarity.
Under Local Option #H, instruction charges for health-related activities are included in
the gross receipts subject to tax. Cities have long held that this applies to group
instruction, but does not apply to individual instruction, such as personal training and
other situations wherein the customer hires the provider for singular attention for a
period of time. This addition codifies this policy and practice, effective January 1, 2019.


Legislative Bills 2014 - 2018
PCC
Effective ARS Section Section 14-
Year Chapter Bill # date 42-XXXX XXXX Description
Exempts entry fees from non-profit
2016 373 HB2674 8/6/2016 5073 410 charity races

6004/5061/5069/ 410/445/455/ Edits the exemption for MLB & pro
2018 249 SB1120 1/1/2018 5073/5074/5159 465/660 golf events


Section III: Amends Sec. 14-415, Construction contracting: construction
contractors.

Legislation (Year: Bill Numbers) – 2014: HB2389, HB2415; 2015: SB1446; 2018:
SB1409

As an element of the TPT Simplification bill in 2013 (HB2111), the Construction
Contracting classification was modified to remove most maintenance and repair
contractors from the classification, allowing them to pay tax to the vendor on the
materials used in their jobs, and eliminating all other tax liability for their construction
activity. Subsequent sessions included three attempts to refine the concept and rules



Page 91
surrounding the taxation of materials only for “Maintenance, Repair, Replacement, and
Alteration” (MRRA) projects. The changes in this section are an amalgamation of the
original language in HB2111 and the three subsequent bills (HB2389, SB1446, and
SB1409), arriving at conformity with the current version of Contracting at the State level
in A.R.S. 42-5075. The changes related to HB2389 and SB 1446 are effective January
1, 2015. The most recent amendment (SB1409) which added an exclusion for
contractors who qualify for the “handyman” exemption from R.O.C. licensing, and also
simplified the definition of “Alteration” on commercial projects is effective as of January
1, 2019 (the prior definition of “Alteration” applies to jobs where the contract was
entered into before January 1, 2019). In addition, a new exemption for construction of a
mixed waste processing facility was also added and is effective retroactively from
January 1, 2013 (HB2415).


Legislative Bills 2014 - 2018

Effectiv ARS Section PCC Section
Year Chapter Bill # e date 42-XXXX 14-XXXX Description
TPT Simplification clean-up -
municipal licenses/penalties;
MRRA exemption certificate;
electronic filing; exempt SNAP
under R&B; create MRRA; SNAP
under Food; transition
IGA/electronic reporting; city
6001/6002/ Admin (Art. V) under state rules;
6004/6009/6056/ initial MRRA preemption; MTHO
1125/2003/2075/ end date; Session Law: refunds,
5005/5009/5014/ Article III/ appeals, license renewal; has
HB238 1/1/201 5015/5074/ 415/455/462/ multiple effective dates, only
2014 263 9 5 5075/5102 530 1/1/2015 matters
1/1/201
5 MRRA edits; 1/1/2015
HB241 1/1/201 Exempt mixed waste processing
2014 228 5 3 5075 415 facility 1/1/2013
Building permit requirements;
create liability for Retail equivalent
9-467 6004/ on MRRA used in Prime; clarify
5005/5008.1/5009/ 110/415/415. Retail exemptions for
SB144 1/1/201 5010/5061/5075/51 1/ Contractors/MRRA; revises MRRA
2015 4 6 5 59 465/660 to limit "alteration", etc.
SB140 1/1/201 Adds ROC Handyman exclusion
2018 341 9 9 6004/5075 415 to 415; simplifies "alteration"


Section IV: Adds Sec. 14-415.1, Liability for MRRA amounts equal to Retail
transaction privilege tax due.

Legislation (Year: Bill Numbers) – 2015: SB1446

A component of the primary amendment addressing the taxation of materials only for
“Maintenance, Repair, Replacement, and Alteration” (MRRA) projects was creating a
mechanism for hybrid contractors (those who perform both regular Contracting jobs and
also perform MRRA jobs) to efficiently purchase materials that could be used in either




Page 92
job type without having to maintain two separate inventories. The solution was to allow
these hybrid contractors to purchase all materials tax exempt, as if they would be used
in traditional prime contracting jobs but allow them to pay tax on the “materials only” if
they were used in a MRRA job. At the State level, A.R.S. 42-5008.1 was created. This
required anyone who used materials purchased without tax to pay the equivalent of the
Retail tax rate based on the job site for any such materials used in a MRAA job. New
Section 415.1 mirrors this section of State law to apply the same principle relative to the
local tax. The section is added effective January 1, 2015 to coincide with the effective
date of A.R.S. 42-5008.1 (SB1446).


Legislative Bills 2014 - 2018

Effective ARS Section PCC Section
Year Chapter Bill # date 42-XXXX 14-XXXX Description
Building permit
requirements; create liability
for Retail equivalent on
MRRA used in Prime; clarify
Retail exemptions for
9-467 6004/ Contractors/MRRA; revises
5005/5008.1/5009/ 110/415/415.1/ MRRA to limit "alteration",
2015 4 SB1446 1/1/2015 5010/5061/5075/5159 465/660 etc.


Section V: Amends Sec. 14-422, Jet fuel sales.

Legislation (Year: Bill Numbers) – 2017: HB2064

This section adds the new exemption for Jet Fuel sales, limiting the tax imposition to
only the first 10 million gallons sold to any individual purchaser during a calendar year.
The same limitation also applies to purchases subject to Jet Fuel Use Tax and appears
in Section XV, amending Section 660 of the code. Additionally, new language is added
restricting the use of funds collected from this classification to being dedicated to
support the local airport or airport system in accordance with FAA rules. Both changes
are effective as of December 1, 2017.


Legislative Bills 2014 - 2018
PCC
Effective ARS Section Section 14-
Year Chapter Bill # date 42-XXXX XXXX Description
Exempts Jet Fuel over 10 million
gallons;
requires tax collected to be spent on
2017 50 HB2064 12/1/2017 6014 422/660 airport operations




Page 93
Section VI: Amends Sec. 14-445, Rental, leasing, and licensing for use of real
property.

Legislation (Year: Bill Numbers) – 2015: 2147; 2018: SB1120

This section adds cable operators to utility and telecommunication companies who can
exempt charges for joint pole usage to others in the same line of business, mirroring a
similar new exemption for all three industries in State statute, effective August 1, 2015.
This section also adds the exemption for events operated by groups associated with
Major League Baseball or a professional golf tour, including the new edits to limit the
application of the exemption for groups owned or controlled by a Major League team,
MLB, or a pro golf tour unless they operated such events before 2018, effective from
and after January 1, 2018.


Legislative Bills 2014 - 2018
PCC
Effectiv ARS Section Section 14-
Year Chapter Bill # e date 42-XXXX XXXX Description
6004/5061/5069 410/450/445
SB112 1/1/201 / / Edits the exemption for MLB & pro golf
2018 249 0 8 5073/5074/5159 455/465/660 events


Section VII: Amends Sec. 14-450, Rental, leasing, and licensing for use of tangible
personal property.

Legislation (Year: Bill Numbers) – 2015: HB2147

This section adds cable operators to utility and telecommunication companies who can
exempt charges for joint pole usage to others in the same line of business, mirroring a
similar new exemption for all three industries in State statute, effective August 1, 2015.


Legislative Bills 2014 - 2018
PCC
Effective ARS Section Section
Year Chapter Bill # date 42-XXXX 14-XXXX Description
Adds cable operators to exemption for
joint pole usage; 8/1/2015, edits
8/1/2015 6004/5063/5064/ definition of "replacement" under
2015 72 HB2147 1/1/2015 5069/5071/5075 450 Contracting - 1/1/2015



Section VIII: Amends Sec. 14-455, Restaurants and Bars.

Legislation (Year: Bill Numbers) – 2014: HB2389; 2018: HB2484, SB1120

First, this section adds the exemption for prepared food and beverages sold to eligible
seniors, homeless, or disabled persons using SNAP benefits, effective January 1, 2015
(HB2389). Second, this section adds the exemption for restaurant sales at events




Page 94
operated by groups associated with Major League Baseball or a professional golf tour,
including the new edits to limit the application of the exemption for groups owned or
controlled by a Major League team, MLB, or a pro golf tour unless they operated such
events before 2018, effective from and after January 1, 2018 (SB1120). Third, this
section adds a restriction prohibiting cities and towns from imposing a discriminatory tax
on any particular food or beverage item (i.e., no “soda” tax), effective August 3, 2018
(HB2484).


Legislative Bills 2014 - 2018

Effective ARS Section PCC Section
Year Chapter Bill # date 42-XXXX 14-XXXX Description
TPT Simplification clean-
up - municipal
licenses/penalties; MRRA
exemption certificate;
electronic filing; exempt
SNAP under R&B; create
MRRA; SNAP under
Food; transition
IGA/electronic reporting;
city Admin (Art. V) under
state rules; initial MRRA
preemption; MTHO end
6001/6002/ date; Session Law:
6004/6009/6056/ refunds, appeals, license
1125/2003/2075/5005/ renewal; has multiple
5009/5014/5015/5074/ Article III/ effective dates, only
2014 263 HB2389 1/1/2015 5075/5102 415/455/462/530 1/1/2015 matters
Moves existing food
preemptions into new
section; prohibits any
differential tax on a
455/462/ specific food (no soda tax
2018 17 HB2484 8/3/2018 6004/6015 465/660 allowed)
6004/5061/5069/ 410/445/ Edits the exemption for
2018 249 SB1120 1/1/2018 5073/5074/5159 455/465/660 MLB & pro golf events


Section IX: Amends Sec. 14-462, Retail sales: food for home consumption.

Legislation (Year: Bill Numbers) – 2014: HB2389; 2018: HB2484

This section adds the exemption for prepared food and beverages sold to eligible
seniors, homeless, or disabled persons using SNAP benefits, effective January 1, 2015
(HB2389). Additionally, this section adds a restriction prohibiting cities and towns from
imposing a discriminatory tax on any particular food or beverage item (i.e., no “soda”
tax), effective August 3, 2018 (HB2484).




Page 95
Legislative Bills 2014 - 2018

Effective ARS Section PCC Section
Year Chapter Bill # date 42-XXXX 14-XXXX Description
TPT Simplification clean-
up - municipal
licenses/penalties; MRRA
exemption certificate;
electronic filing; exempt
SNAP under R&B; create
MRRA; SNAP under
Food; transition
IGA/electronic reporting;
city Admin (Art. V) under
state rules; initial MRRA
preemption; MTHO end
date; Session Law:
6001/6002/ refunds, appeals, license
6004/6009/6056/ renewal;
1125/2003/2075/5005/ has multiple effective
5009/5014/5015/5074/ Article III/ dates, only 1/1/2015
2014 263 HB2389 1/1/2015 5075/5102 415/455/462/530 matters
Moves existing food
preemptions into new
section; prohibits any
differential tax on a
455/462/ specific food (no soda tax
2018 17 HB2484 8/3/2018 6004/6015 465/660 allowed)


Section X: Amends Sec. 14-465, Retail sales: exemptions.

Legislation (Year: Bill Numbers) – 2014: HB2285; 2015: SB1446; 2016: HB2326,
HB2536, HB2584; 2018: HB2484, SB1120

There were multiple changes to the exemptions from the Retail classification added or
amended by the legislature, listed here in order of year enacted and bill number,
followed by effective date and the subsection impacted.
1) 2014, HB2285: Added an exemption for the transfer of coal back and forth between
a power plant and a coal refinery under certain circumstances, effective January 1,
2015; Subsection (ss).
2) 2015, SB1446: Added persons possessing a “MRRA” exemption certificate to the
current exemption for sales of construction materials to a contractor, effective
January 1, 2015; Subsection (k).
3) 2016, HB2326: Added farmers who produce animal feed to the statutory definition of
“Food Producer” thus making their sales exempt from tax when selling directly to
other farmers to feed their livestock, to other animal owners, or to livestock boarding
facilities, effective August 6, 2016; Subsection (v).
4) 2016, HB2536: Created new Local Option #QQ, allowing the exemption of fine art
sold by an auction house to a non-resident if shipped out-of-state, available for
selection with an effective date any time from and after September 1, 2016 to match
the effective date of the similar State exemption; Subsection (tt).




Page 96
5) 2016, HB2584: Edited the requirements to qualify for the exemption of data center
equipment that qualifies for tax relief offered by the Arizona Commerce Authority,
effective retroactively from September 12, 2013; Subsection (uu).
6) 2018, HB2484: Added exemptions for the sale, manufacture or distribution among
wholesalers of food for human consumption, as well any container or packaging
used exclusively for transporting, protecting or consuming food items intended for
human consumption (as part of the preemption against a “soda” tax), effective
August 3, 2018; Subsections (vv) and (ww).
7) 2018, SB1120: Added the exemption for retail sales at events operated by groups
associated with Major League Baseball or a professional golf tour, including the new
edits to limit the application of the exemption for groups owned or controlled by a
Major League team, MLB, or a pro golf tour unless they operated such events before
2018, effective from and after January 1, 2018; Subsection (y).
Note that a conditional exemption for all sales of coal has not been included at this time,
as the required conditions for enactment have not been met (2018, HB2003).


Legislative Bills 2014 - 2018

Effective ARS Section PCC Section
Year Chapter Bill # date 42-XXXX 14-XXXX Description
Exempt coal transfers
6004/5061/5072/ between the mine and
2014 54 HB2285 1/1/2015 5151/5159 465/660 refiner
Building permit
requirements; create liability
for Retail equivalent on
MRRA used in Prime; clarify
Retail exemptions for
9-467 6004/ Contractors/MRRA; revises
5005/5008.1/5009/ 110/415/415.1/ MRRA to limit "alteration",
2015 4 SB1446 1/1/2015 5010/5061/5075/5159 465/660 etc.
Adds farmers who sell
livestock feed to the
3-561/3-563 definition of "food
2016 361 HB2326 8/6/2016 5009/5022/5061/5159 465/660 producers"
Adds new Option #QQ for
fine art sold by auction to
2016 368 HB2536 9/1/2016 5061 465 non-resident
Edits exemption for data
2016 369 HB2584 9/12/2013 6004/5061/5159 465/660 center equipment
Preemption of tax on sales
of coal - NOT EFFECTIVE
UNLESS the Navajo Nation
sells its generating station
2018 263 HB2003 1/1/2023 6004/2061/5072 465 before 12/31/2022
Moves existing food
preemptions into new
section; prohibits any
455/462/ differential tax on a specific
2018 17 HB2484 8/3/2018 6004/6015 465/660 food (no soda tax allowed)
6004/5061/5069/ 410/445/ Edits the exemption for MLB
2018 249 SB1120 1/1/2018 5073/5074/5159 455/465/660 & pro golf events




Page 97
Section XI: Amends Sec. 14-470, Telecommunication services.

Legislation (Year: Bill Numbers) – 2014: HB2546

This section adds an exemption for alarm monitoring when performed by an in-state
company. Previously, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled that out of state alarm
monitoring was considered exempt interstate telecommunications. This bill placed in-
state monitoring companies on a level playing field with out of state ones. Per this bill,
the change related to in-state monitoring companies is effective from and after January
1, 2015. Based on the court decision, out of state monitoring companies are deemed
exempt at any time.


Legislative Bills 2014 - 2018
PCC
Effective ARS Section Section 14-
Year Chapter Bill # date 42-XXXX XXXX Description
Exempts alarm monitoring from
2014 174 HB2546 1/1/2015 6004 470 Telecommunications



Section XII: Amends Sec. 14-475, Transporting for hire.

Legislation (Year: Bill Numbers) – 2016: SB1492

This section adds exemptions for “vehicles for hire” services (taxis, livery vehicles, and
limousines), as well as “Transportation Network Company” drivers, as those terms are
defined in A.R.S. Sections 28-9501 and 28-9551. This bill clarifies prior legislation
related to companies such as Uber and Lyft, and attempts to create equal tax treatment
for traditional taxi and limo services. The new exemptions are effective beginning
September 1, 2016.


Legislative Bills 2014 - 2018
PCC
Effective ARS Section Section 14-
Year Chapter Bill # date 42-XXXX XXXX Description
Exempts "vehicles for hire" (taxis,
livery, and limos) and Transportation
2016 171 SB1492 9/1/2016 6004/5062 475 Network Company drivers (Uber)



Section XIII: Amends Sec. 14-480, Utility services.

Legislation (Year: Bill Numbers) – 2015: HB2670; 2016: HB2025, HB2676, SB1505

Changes to this section are all related to the 2014 State level adoption of an exemption
for electricity or natural gas used in manufacturing or smelting operations (SB1413).
While the cities and towns were not required to adopt this exemption, A.R.S. 42-6012




Page 98
does require each city and town to either tax this area in full or exempt it in the exact
same manner as the State. Therefore, at the municipal level an option to adopt this
exemption was added to the Model City Tax Code as Local Option #PP in 2014,
however, no city or town has ever chosen to adopt it. Changes in this section reflect
subsequent modifications made by the legislature to the State exemption, intended to
maintain the Local Option in conformity with the State version. In 2015, HB2670 added
“international operations centers” (a type of data center) to the eligible types of facilities
that could qualify for the exemption, effective August 1, 2015. In 2016 three bills made
additional changes to the State exemption. First, HB2025 added “liquefied petroleum
gas” to the list of eligible utilities that could be exempted. Second, SB1505 removed a
clause from the original language that specifically stated gas transportation charges
were excluded from the exemption, thus making them included. These two changes are
added with effective dates matching the State effective date of September 1, 2016.
Finally in 2016, HB2676 significantly altered the energy usage and other requirements
necessary for a company to qualify for the exemption, as well as removing authority to
verify the qualification from the DOR. This change is added as of the same date it
applies at the State level: January 1, 2017.


Legislative Bills 2014 - 2018
PCC
Effective ARS Section Section 14-
Year Chapter Bill # date 42-XXXX XXXX Description
Electricity, natural gas to a
manufacturer exempt; Local
Option #PP
2014 7 SB1413 8/1/2015 6012/5063/5159 480/660 ALREADY ADOPTED
Adds "international operations
center" to Option #PP for
Utilities exemption for
2015 6 HB2670 8/1/2015 6012/5063/5159 480/660 manufacturers
Adds 'liquefied petroleum gas"
2016 359 HB2025 9/1/2016 6012/5063/5159 480/660 to Option #PP
Alters the qualifications, etc. for
2016 374 HB2676 1/1/2017 6012/5009/5063/5159 480/660 Option #PP
Adds gas transportation
2016 357 SB1505 9/1/2016 6012/5063/5159 480/660 charges to Option #PP


Section XIV: Amends Sec. 14-530, When tax due; when delinquent; verification of
return; extensions.

Legislation (Year: Bill Numbers) – 2014: HB2283, HB2288, HB2389

Note that in 2014, HB2389 amended A.R.S. 42-6002(A) to state that, unless the context
otherwise requires, Chapter 1 and Chapter 5, Article 1 of Title 42 governs the
administration of the municipal privilege taxes levied by a city or town, effective from
and after January 1, 2015. The impact of this amendment on the Model City Tax Code
will ultimately lead to the elimination of most of Article V – Administration, along with the
elimination of Appendix I – Modifications to Model City Code for Cities and Towns in the
State Collection System. However, this effective date anticipated the DOR would begin




Page 99
complete TPT administration for all cities and towns not later than January 1, 2015. In
reality, this did not occur with regard to the 15 former self-collecting cities until January
1, 2017. As such, Article V and Appendix I remained in place to govern the ongoing
activities of cities and towns prior to completion of the TPT Simplification project. With
the successful transition to Department administration, the changes necessitated by
HB2389 will be taken up in future modifications to the MCTC. For the moment, the first
two bills noted above have created significant return filing changes that we wish to
reflect in the Model until such time as the complete implementation of HB2389 can be
adopted into the body of the MCTC.

HB2283 changes the filing delinquency date for the Department and for cities by
eliminating the State reliance on postmark dates and changing the city rule of accepting
returns on the last business day. The new rules for both cities and the State deem a tax
return delinquent if it is not received by the State electronically by the last business day
of the month or received by the State by the day before the last business day if filed by
paper. HB2288 increased the minimum filing frequency thresholds to determine when a
taxpayer may file and pay on a less than monthly basis, and HB2389 further amended
this section to require that the combined total tax due from all jurisdictions including
counties and cities/towns must be considered, rather than just the State liability as had
been the previous determinant. The new thresholds call for all taxpayers to file on a
monthly basis unless their total annual tax liability to all jurisdictions is between $8,000
and $2,000, in which case they may choose to file and pay quarterly, or if their annual
tax liability is less than $2,000 they may choose to file and pay annually.


Legislative Bills 2014 - 2018
PCC
Effective ARS Section Section 14-
Year Chapter Bill # date 42-XXXX XXXX Description
Filing is delinquent if not
received by last day
electronically or day before
2014 139 HB2283 1/1/2015 5014 530 last filed by paper
Changes M/Q/A filing
2014 141 HB2288 1/1/2015 5014 530 thresholds
TPT Simplification clean-up -
municipal licenses/penalties;
MRRA exemption certificate;
electronic filing; exempt SNAP
under R&B; create MRRA;
SNAP under Food; transition
IGA/electronic reporting; city
Admin (Art. V) under state
rules; initial MRRA
6001/6002/ preemption; MTHO end date;
6004/6009/6056/ Session Law: refunds,
1125/2003/2075/5005/ Article III/ appeals, license renewal; has
5009/5014/5015/5074/ 415/455/462 multiple effective dates, only
2014 263 HB2389 1/1/2015 5075/5102/ 530 1/1/2015 matters




Page 100
Section XV: Amends Sec. 14-660, Use tax: exemptions.

Legislation (Year: Bill Numbers) – 2014: HB2285; 2015: HB2670, SB1446; 2016:
HB2025, HB2326, HB2584, HB2676, SB1505; 2017: HB2064; 2018: HB2484, SB1120

There were multiple changes to Use tax exemptions, reflecting similar exemptions
added or amended to the Contracting, Jet Fuel, Restaurant & Bar, Retail, and Utilities
classifications. They are listed here in order of year enacted and bill number, and they
are each followed by the effective date and the subsection impacted.
1) 2014, HB2285: Added exemption for the transfer of coal back and forth between a
power plant and coal refinery, effective January 1, 2015; Subsection (tt).
2) 2015, HB2670: Added “international operations centers” to the eligible facilities that
can qualify for exempt purchases of Utilities used in manufacturing and smelting
(Local Option #PP), effective August 1, 2015; Subsection (ss).
3) 2015, SB1446: Added persons possessing a “MRRA” exemption certificate to the
current exemption for purchases of construction materials by a contractor, effective
January 1, 2015; Subsection (k).
4) 2016, HB2025: Added “liquefied petroleum gas” to the eligible utilities that could be
purchased exempt for use in manufacturing, smelting, and international operation
centers (Local Option #PP), effective September 1, 2016; Subsection (ss).
5) 2016, HB2326: Added farmers who produce animal feed to the statutory definition of
“Food Producer” thus making all purchases of their feed exempt from tax, effective
August 6, 2016; Subsection (v).
6) 2016, HB2584: Edited the requirements for the exemption of data center equipment
that qualifies for tax relief offered by the Arizona Commerce Authority, effective
retroactively from September 12, 2013; Subsection (uu).
7) 2016, HB2676: Amended the minimum energy usage and other requirements
necessary to qualify for purchasing exempt utilities for use in manufacturing,
smelting, and international operation centers (Local Option #PP), effective January
1, 2017; Subsection (ss).
8) 2016, SB1505: Removed a clause from the original language that stated gas
transportation charges were excluded from the exemption for utilities for use in
manufacturing, smelting, and international operation centers (Local Option #PP),
thus making them exempt, effective September 1, 2016; Subsection (ss).
9) 2017, HB2064: Added a new limitation on Jet Fuel Use tax (Local Option #LL),
limiting Use tax imposition to only the first 10 million gallons purchased during a
calendar year, effective December 1, 2018; Subsection (vv).
10) 2018, HB2484: Added exemptions for the purchase, manufacture or distribution
among wholesalers of food for human consumption, as well any container or
packaging used exclusively for transporting, protecting or consuming food items
intended for human consumption (as part of the preemption against a “soda” tax),
effective August 3, 2018; Subsections (ww) and (yy).
11) 2018, SB1120: Added the exemption for purchases of tangible personal property
sold at events operated by groups associated with Major League Baseball or a
professional golf tour, including new amendments to prohibit application of the
exemption for groups owned or controlled by a Major League team, MLB, or a pro




Page 101
golf tour unless they operated such events before 2018, effective from and after
January 1, 2018; Subsection (ee).


Legislative Bills 2014 - 2018

Effective ARS Section PCC Section
Year Chapter Bill # date 42-XXXX 14-XXXX Description
Exempt coal transfers
6004/5061/5072/ between the mine and
2014 54 HB2285 1/1/2015 5151/5159 465/660 refiner
Electricity, natural gas to a
manufacturer exempt; Local
Option #PP
2014 7 SB1413 8/1/2015 6012/5063/5159 480/660 ALREADY ADOPTED
Adds "international
operations center" to Option
#PP for Utilities exemption
2015 6 HB2670 8/1/2015 6012/5063/5159 480 / 660 for manufacturers
Building permit
requirements; create liability
for Retail equivalent on
MRRA used in Prime; clarify
Retail exemptions for
9-467 6004/ Contractors/MRRA; revises
5005/5008.1/5009/ 110/415/415.1/ MRRA to limit "alteration",
2015 4 SB1446 1/1/2015 5010/5061/5075/5159 465/660 etc.
Adds 'liquefied petroleum
2016 359 HB2025 9/1/2016 6012/5063/5159 480/660 gas" to Option #PP
Adds farmers who sell
livestock feed to the
3-561/3-563 definition of "food
2016 361 HB2326 8/6/2016 5009/5022/5061/5159 465/660 producers"
Edits exemption for data
2016 369 HB2584 9/12/2013 6004/5061/5159 465/660 center equipment
Alters the qualifications, etc.
2016 374 HB2676 1/1/2017 6012/5009/5063/5159 480/660 for Option #PP
Adds gas transportation
2016 357 SB1505 9/1/2016 6012/5063/5159 480/660 charges to Option #PP
Exempts Jet Fuel over 10
million gallons; requires tax
collected to be spent on
2017 50 HB2064 12/1/2017 6014 422/660 airport operations
Moves existing food
preemptions into new
section; prohibits any
455/462/ differential tax on a specific
2018 17 HB2484 8/3/2018 6004/6015 465/660 food (no soda tax allowed)
6004/5061/5069/ 410/445/ Edits the exemption for MLB
2018 249 SB1120 1/1/2018 5073/5074/5159 455/465/660 & pro golf events




Page 102
2019 Speculative Builder Amendment

This amendment addresses certain issues presented in bills at the legislature by
resolving the concerns of proponents, along with numerous clean-up edits, and the
transfer of selected Regulations to the main body of the MCTC as new Sections. These
amendments were approved by the Municipal Tax Code Commission in a public hearing
held on February 22, 2019.

Section XVI: Amends Sec. 14-416, Construction Contracting - speculative
builders.

Speculative builders are taxed at the local level only. These changes are effective on
April 1, 2019. The amendment changed the definition of "Improved Real Property" to
clarify that only the first sale after the Certificate of Occupancy or similar document is
issued is subject to tax, and any subsequent improvements, remodeling or expansion of
the original building is not considered taxable as reconstruction or the creation of a new
structure; changed the definition of "Partially Improved Residential Real Property" by
removing the word “residential” in several places and making grammatical edits,
opening up the exemption for sales between two developers for both residential and
commercial builders, including those who only do non-structural improvements to
vacant land or add water, power, and streets; eliminated Local Option #M which allowed
a deduction from the selling price for the cost of land. Local Option #N remains in place,
allowing for a deduction based on the "fair market value" of land, with 20% of total
selling price as the default safe harbor; removed the requirement that developers attach
a written statement to their tax return for any sale to another developer; added an
exemption for in-place leases allowing a reduction in total selling price for the present
value of obligated future lease receipt, which recognizes the sale of a property with
existing leases is really the sale of a building combined with the sale of the business of
residential or commercial lease; placed in code a deduction that has been applied for
decades in accordance with a practice decision and written direction provided by the
cities, allowing a seller to reduce the selling price by the amount of taxes paid by their
contractor to the state and county; added language clarifying that a tax credit is allowed
for any Spec builder tax paid by a prior owner if a subsequent sale is subjected to the
tax; and added "Qualified Trust" to the list of persons who can make a bona fide sale of
a home and thus be exempt from the tax, provided at least one resident in the home is a
beneficiary of the trust.




Page 103
2019 Speculative Builder Amendment
ARS
Effective Section PCC Section
Year Chapter Bill # date 42-XXXX 14-XXXX Description
Speculative builders- taxable at the local
level only: adds clarifying language to
definitions for "improved real property" and
"partially improved residential real
property" regarding exemption for sales
between two developers; sets the agreed-
upon calculation of the tax base deduction;
eliminates the developer sales written
statement requirement; adds exemption for
in-place leases; codifies practice of
allowing sales price reduction for taxes
already paid by contractor; clarifies sales of
Qualified Trusts; and transfers
corresponding Section 416 Regulations to
the main body of the MCTC as new
2019 N/A N/A 4/1/2019 N/A 416/416.1/416.2 Sections.




Page 104
2019 Rental of Real Property and Telecommunications Amendments

The amendments titled “2019 Rental of Real Property Amendment” with a retroactive
effective date of January 1, 2012 and “2019 Telecommunications Amendment” with an
effective date of July 1, 2019 address certain issues presented in bills at the legislature
by resolving the concerns of proponents, along with various clean-up edits, and the
transfer of selected Regulations to the main body of the MCTC as new Sections. These
amendments were approved by the Municipal Tax Code Commission in a public hearing
held on May 31, 2019.

Included in Section VI: Amends Sec. 14-445, Rental, leasing, and licensing for use
of real property.
Amends Sec. 445, Rental, leasing, and licensing for use of real property with a
retroactive effective date of January 1, 2012. It removes an obsolete Local Option #T
related to affiliated corporations; adds an exemption for payments by residents pursuant
to life care contracts to a provider that holds a permit issued by the Department of
Insurance; and establishes a limit on refund claims and the process for seeking claims.

2019 Rental of Real Property Amendment
ARS PCC
Effective Section Section
Year Chapter Bill # date 42-XXXX 14-XXXX Description
Removes an obsolete Local Option #T related
to affiliated corporations; adds an exemption for
payments by residents pursuant to life care
contracts to a provider that holds a permit
issued by the Department of Insurance; and
establishes a limit on refund claims and the
2019 N/A N/A 1/1/2012 N/A 445 process for seeking claims.


Included in Section XI: Amends Sec. 14-470, Telecommunication services.
Amends Sec. 470, Telecommunication services with an effective date of July 1, 2019. It
incorporates the language of former Regulation 470.1 into the Section; adds an
exemption for “over-the-top” audio and video programming and related on-demand
programming provided without an additional charge; and repeals Regulation 470.1.

2019 Telecommunications Amendment
ARS PCC
Effective Section Section
Year Chapter Bill # date 42-XXXX 14-XXXX Description
Incorporates the language of former Regulation
470.1 into the Section; adds an exemption for
“over-the-top” audio and video programming and
related on-demand programming provided
without an additional charge; and repeals
2019 N/A N/A 7/1/2019 N/A 470 Regulation 470.1.




Page 105
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 Section I. Phoenix City Code Section 14-110 is amended as follows, with the following

2 effective dates per subsection: (a)(3) January 1, 2015; (a)(6) June 1, 1998; (a)(6)(A)(iv)

3 January 1, 2018; (a)(14) April 17, 1985.


5 Sec.14-110. Definitions: Income-producing capital equipment.

6 (a) The following tangible personal property, other than items excluded in subsection (d)

7 below, shall be deemed "income-producing capital equipment" for the purposes of this

8 Chapter:

9 (1) machinery or equipment used directly in manufacturing, processing, fabricating,

10 job printing, refining or metallurgical operations. The terms "manufacturing",

11 "processing", "fabricating", "job printing", "refining", and "metallurgical" as used

12 in this paragraph refer to and include those operations commonly understood

13 within their ordinary meaning. "Metallurgical operations" includes leaching,

14 milling, precipitating, smelting and refining.

15 (2) mining machinery, or equipment, used directly in the process of extracting ores or

16 minerals from the earth for commercial purposes, including equipment required to

17 prepare the materials for extraction and handling, loading or transporting such

18 extracted material to the surface. "Mining" includes underground, surface and

19 open pit operations for extracting ores and minerals.

20 (3) tangible personal property, sold to persons engaged in business classified under

21 the telecommunications classification, INCLUDING A PERSON

22 REPRESENTING OR WORKING ON BEHALF OF SUCH A PERSON IN A

23 MANNER DESCRIBED IN SECTION 14-415(B)(12) AND A.R.S. SECTION



Page 106
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 42-5075, SUBSECTION O, consisting of central office switching equipment;

2 switchboards; private branch exchange equipment; microwave radio equipment,

3 and carrier equipment including optical fiber, coaxial cable, and other

4 transmission media which are components of carrier systems.

5 (4) machinery, equipment, or transmission lines used directly in producing or

6 transmitting electrical power, but not including distribution. Transformers and

7 control equipment used at transmission substation sites constitute equipment used

8 in producing or transmitting electrical power.

9 (5) pipes or valves four inches (4") in diameter or larger and related equipment, used

10 to transport oil, natural gas, artificial gas, water, or coal slurry. For the purpose of

11 this Section, related equipment includes: compressor units, regulators, machinery

12 and equipment, fittings, seals and any other parts that are used in operating the

13 pipes or valves.

14 (6) aircraft, navigational and communication instruments, and other accessories and

15 related equipment sold to:

16 (A) a person:

17 (i) holding, OR EXEMPTED BY FEDERAL LAW FROM

18 OBTAINING, a federal certificate of public convenience and

19 necessity FOR USE AS, IN CONJUNCTION WITH OR

20 BECOMING PART OF AN AIRCRAFT TO BE USED TO

21 TRANSPORT PERSONS FOR HIRE IN INTRASTATE,

22 INTERSTATE OR FOREIGN COMMERCE.




Page 107
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (ii) THAT IS CERTIFICATED OR LICENSED UNDER FEDERAL

2 AVIATION ADMINISTRATION REGULATIONS (14 CODE

3 OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS PART 121 OR 135) AS A

4 SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED CARRIER OF PERSONS

5 FOR HIRE FOR USE AS OR IN CONJUNCTION WITH OR

6 BECOMING PART OF AN AIRCRAFT TO BE USED TO

7 TRANSPORT PERSONS FOR HIRE IN INTRASTATE,

8 INTERSTATE OR FOREIGN COMMERCE.

9 (iii) HOLDING A foreign air carrier permit for air transportation for

10 use as or in conjunction with or becoming a part of aircraft to be

11 used to transport persons, property or United States mail in

12 intrastate, interstate or foreign commerce.

13 (iv) OPERATING AN AIRCRAFT TO TRANSPORT PERSONS IN

14 ANY MANNER FOR COMPENSATION OR HIRE, OR FOR

15 USE IN A FRACTIONAL OWNERSHIP PROGRAM THAT

16 MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL AVIATION

17 ADMINISTRATION REGULATIONS (14 CODE OF FEDERAL

18 REGULATIONS PART 91, SUBPART K), INCLUDING AS AN

19 AIR CARRIER, A FOREIGN AIR CARRIER OR A

20 COMMERCIAL OPERATOR OR UNDER A RESTRICTED

21 CATEGORY, WITHIN THE MEANING OF 14 CODE OF

22 FEDERAL REGULATIONS, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER

23 THE OPERATION OR AIRCRAFT IS REGULATED OR




Page 108
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 CERTIFIED UNDER PART 91, 119, 121, 133, 135, 136 OR 137,

2 OR ANOTHER PART OF 14 CODE OF FEDERAL

3 REGULATIONS.

4 (v) THAT WILL LEASE OR OTHERWISE TRANSFER

5 OPERATIONAL CONTROL, WITHIN THE MEANING OF

6 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OPERATIONS

7 SPECIFICATION A008, OR ITS SUCCESSOR, OF THE

8 AIRCRAFT, INSTRUMENTS OR ACCESSORIES TO ONE OR

9 MORE PERSONS DESCRIBED IN ITEM (i), (ii), (iii) OR (iv)

10 OF THIS SUBDIVISION, SUBJECT TO A.R.S. SECTION 42-

11 5009, SUBSECTION N.

12 (B) any foreign government.

13 (C) persons who are not residents of this State and who will not use such

14 property in this State other than in removing such property from this State.

15 This subdivision also applies to corporations that are not incorporated in

16 this State, regardless of maintaining a place of business in this State, if the

17 principal corporate office is located outside this State and the property will

18 not be used in this State other than in removing the property from this

19 State.

20 (7) machinery, tools, equipment and related supplies used or consumed directly in

21 repairing, remodeling or maintaining aircraft, aircraft engines or aircraft

22 component parts by or on behalf of a certificated or licensed carrier of persons or

23 property.




Page 109
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (8) railroad rolling stock, rails, ties and signal control equipment used directly to

2 transport persons or property.

3 (9) machinery or equipment used directly to drill for oil or gas or used directly in the

4 process of extracting oil or gas from the earth for commercial purposes.

5 (10) buses or other urban mass transit vehicles which are used directly to transport

6 persons or property for hire or pursuant to a governmentally adopted and

7 controlled urban mass transportation program and which are sold to bus

8 companies holding a federal certificate of convenience and necessity or operated

9 by a city, town or other governmental entity or by any person contracting with

10 such governmental entity as part of a governmentally adopted and controlled

11 program to provide urban mass transportation.

12 (11) metering, monitoring, receiving, and transmitting equipment acquired by persons

13 engaged in the business of providing utility services or telecommunications

14 services; but only to the extent that such equipment is to be used by the customers

15 of such persons and such persons separately charge or bill their customers for use

16 of such equipment.

17 (12) groundwater measuring devices required under A.R.S. SECTION 45-604.

18 (13) machinery or equipment used in research and development. In this paragraph,

19 "research and development" means basic and applied research in the sciences and

20 engineering, and designing, developing or testing prototypes, processes or new

21 products, including research and development of computer software that is

22 embedded in or an integral part of the prototype or new product or that is required

23 for machinery or equipment otherwise exempt under this Section to function




Page 110
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 effectively. Research and development do not include manufacturing quality

2 control, routine consumer product testing, market research, sales promotion, sales

3 service, research in social sciences or psychology, computer software research

4 that is not included in the definition of research and development, or other

5 nontechnological activities or technical services.

6 (14) (Reserved)

7 (15) Included in income producing capital equipment are liquid, solid or gaseous

8 chemicals used in manufacturing, processing, fabricating, mining, refining,

9 metallurgical operations, research and development or job printing, if using or

10 consuming the chemicals, alone or as part of an integrated system of chemicals,

11 involving direct contact with the materials from which the product is produced for

12 the purpose of causing or permitting a chemical or physical change to occur in the

13 materials as part of the production process. This subsection does not include

14 chemicals that are used or consumed in activities such as packaging, storage or

15 transportation but does not affect any deduction for such chemicals that is

16 otherwise provided by this Code. Chemicals meeting the requirements of this

17 subsection are deemed not to be expendable under subsection (d) of this Section.

18 (16) cleanrooms that are used for manufacturing, processing, fabrication or research

19 and development, as defined in paragraph (13) of this subsection, of

20 semiconductor products. For purposes of this paragraph, "cleanroom" means all

21 property that comprises or creates an environment where humidity, temperature,

22 particulate matter and contamination are precisely controlled within specified

23 parameters, without regard to whether the property is actually contained within




Page 111
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 that environment or whether any of the property is affixed to or incorporated into

2 real property. Cleanroom:

3 (A) includes the integrated systems, fixtures, piping, movable partitions,

4 lighting and all property that is necessary or adapted to reduce

5 contamination or to control airflow, temperature, humidity, chemical

6 purity or other environmental conditions or manufacturing tolerances, as

7 well as the production machinery and equipment operating in conjunction

8 with the cleanroom environment.

9 (B) does not include the building or other permanent, nonremovable

10 component of the building that houses the cleanroom environment.

11 (17) machinery and equipment that are purchased by or on behalf of the owners of a

12 soundstage complex and primarily used for motion picture, multimedia or

13 interactive video production in the complex. This paragraph applies only if the

14 initial construction of the soundstage complex begins after June 30, 1996 and

15 before January 1, 2002 and the machinery and equipment are purchased before

16 the expiration of five years after the start of initial construction. For purposes of

17 this paragraph:

18 (A) “motion picture, multimedia or interactive video production" includes

19 products for theatrical and television release, educational presentations,

20 electronic retailing, documentaries, music videos, industrial films, cd-rom,

21 video game production, commercial advertising and television episode

22 production and other genres that are introduced through developing

23 technology.




Page 112
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (B) “soundstage complex" means a facility of multiple stages including

2 production offices, construction shops and related areas, prop and costume

3 shops, storage areas, parking for production vehicles and areas that are

4 leased to businesses that complement the production needs and orientation

5 of the overall facility.

6 (18) tangible personal property that is used by either of the following to receive, store,

7 convert, produce, generate, decode, encode, control or transmit

8 telecommunications information:

9 (A) any direct broadcast satellite television or data transmission service that

10 operates pursuant to 47 Code of Federal Regulations parts 25 and 100.

11 (B) any satellite television or data transmission facility, if both of the

12 following conditions are met:

13 (i) over two-thirds of the transmissions, measured in megabytes,

14 transmitted by the facility during the test period were transmitted

15 to or on behalf of one or more direct broadcast satellite television

16 or data transmission services that operate pursuant to 47 Code of

17 Federal Regulations parts 25 and 100.

18 (ii) over two-thirds of the transmissions, measured in megabytes,

19 transmitted by or on behalf of those direct broadcast television or

20 data transmission services during the test period were transmitted

21 by the facility to or on behalf of those services.

22 For purposes of subdivision (B) of this paragraph, "test period" means the

23 three hundred sixty-five day period beginning on the later of the date on




Page 113
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 which the tangible personal property is purchased or the date on which the

2 direct broadcast satellite television or data transmission service first

3 transmits information to its customers.

4 (19) machinery and equipment that is used directly in the feeding of poultry, the

5 environmental control of housing for poultry, the movement of eggs within a

6 production and packaging facility or the sorting or cooling of eggs. This

7 exemption does not apply to vehicles used for transporting eggs.

8 (20) machinery or equipment, including related structural components, that is

9 employed in connection with manufacturing, processing, fabricating, job printing,

10 refining, mining, natural gas pipelines, metallurgical operations,

11 telecommunications, producing or transmitting electricity or research and

12 development that is used directly to meet or exceed rules or regulations adopted

13 by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the United States Environmental

14 Protection Agency, the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the

15 Arizona Department of Environmental Quality or a political subdivision of this

16 state to prevent, monitor, control or reduce land, water or air pollution.

17 (21) machinery or equipment that enables a television station to originate and

18 broadcast or to receive and broadcast digital television signals and that was

19 purchased to facilitate compliance with the Telecommunications Act of 1996

20 (P.L. 104-104; 110 Stat. 56; 47 United States Code Section 336) and the Federal

21 Communications Commission Order issued April 21, 1997, 47 Code of Federal

22 Regulations Part 73. This paragraph does not exempt any of the following:




Page 114
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (A) repair or replacement parts purchased for the machinery or equipment

2 described in this paragraph.

3 (B) machinery or equipment purchased to replace machinery or equipment for

4 which an exemption was previously claimed and taken under this

5 paragraph.

6 (C) any machinery or equipment purchased after the television station has

7 ceased analog broadcasting, or purchased after November 1, 2009,

8 whichever occurs first.

9 (b) The term "income-producing capital equipment" shall further include ancillary machinery

10 and equipment used for the treatment of waste products created by the business activities

11 which are allowed to purchase "income-producing capital equipment" defined in

12 subsection (a) above.

13 (c) The term "income-producing capital equipment" shall further include repair and

14 replacement parts, other than the items in subsection (d) below, where the property is

15 acquired to become an integral part of another item itemized in subsections (a) or (b)

16 above.

17 (d) The tangible personal property defined as income-producing capital equipment in this

18 Section shall not include:

19 (1) expendable materials. For purposes of this paragraph, expendable materials do not

20 include any of the categories of tangible personal property specified in

21 subsections (a), (b) or (c) of this Section regardless of the cost or useful life of

22 that property.

23 (2) janitorial equipment and hand tools.




Page 115
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (3) office equipment, furniture, and supplies.

2 (4) tangible personal property used in selling or distributing activities.

3 (5) motor vehicles required to be licensed by the State of Arizona, except buses or

4 other urban mass transit vehicles specifically exempted pursuant to subsection

5 (a)(10) above without regard to the use of such motor vehicles.

6 (6) shops, buildings, docks, depots, and all other materials of whatever kind or

7 character not specifically included as exempt.

8 (7) motors and pumps used in drip irrigation systems.

9 (8) (RESERVED)

10 (e) For the purposes of this Section:

11 (1) “aircraft” includes:

12 (A) an airplane flight simulator that is approved by the Federal Aviation

13 Administration for use as a Phase II or higher flight simulator under

14 Appendix H, 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 121.

15 (B) tangible personal property that is permanently affixed or attached as a

16 component part of an aircraft that is owned or operated by a certificated or

17 licensed carrier of persons or property.

18 (2) “other accessories and related equipment" includes aircraft accessories and

19 equipment such as ground service equipment that physically contact aircraft at

20 some point during the overall carrier operation.





Page 116
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 Section II. Phoenix City Code Section 14-410 is amended as follows with the following

2 effective dates per subsection: (b)(6) January 1, 2018; (b)(7) January 1, 2010; (b)(8) August

3 6, 2016; (b)(9) January 1, 2019.


5 Sec. 14-410. Amusements, exhibitions, and similar activities.

6 (a) The tax rate shall be at an amount equal to two and three-tenths percent (2.3%) of the

7 gross income from the business activity upon every person engaging or continuing in the

8 business of providing amusement that begins in the city or takes place entirely within the

9 City, which includes the following type or nature of businesses:

10 (1) operating or conducting theaters, movies, operas, shows of any type or nature,

11 exhibitions, concerts, carnivals, circuses, amusement parks, menageries, fairs,

12 races, contests, games, billiard or pool parlors, bowling alleys, skating rinks,

13 tennis courts, golf courses, video games, pinball machines, public dances, dance

14 halls, sports events, jukeboxes, batting and driving ranges, animal rides, or any

15 other business charging admission for exhibition, amusement, or entertainment.

16 (2) (Reserved)

17 (b) Deductions or exemptions. The gross proceeds of sales or gross income derived from the

18 following sources is exempt from the tax imposed by this Section:

19 (1) (Reserved)

20 (2) Amounts retained by the Arizona Exposition and State Fair Board from ride ticket

21 sales at the annual Arizona State Fair.

22 (3) Income received from a hotel business subject to tax under Section 14-444, if all

23 of the following apply:




Page 117
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (A) The hotel business receives gross income from a customer for the specific

2 business activity otherwise subject to amusement tax.

3 (B) The consideration received by the hotel business is equal to or greater than

4 the amount to be deducted under this subsection.

5 (C) The hotel business has provided an exemption certificate to the person

6 engaging in business under this Section.

7 (4) Income that is specifically included as the gross income of a business activity

8 upon which another Section of this Article imposes a tax, that is separately stated

9 to the customer and is taxable to the person engaged in that classification not to

10 exceed consideration paid to the person conducting the activity.

11 (5) Income from arranging transportation connected to amusement activity that is

12 separately stated to the customer, not to exceed consideration paid to the

13 transportation business.

14 (6) EXHIBITION EVENTS IN THIS STATE SPONSORED, CONDUCTED OR

15 OPERATED BY A NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION THAT IS EXEMPT FROM

16 TAXATION UNDER SECTION 501(C)(3), 501(C)(4) OR 501(C)(6) OF THE

17 INTERNAL REVENUE CODE IF THE ORGANIZATION IS ASSOCIATED

18 WITH A MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL TEAM OR A NATIONAL TOURING

19 PROFESSIONAL GOLFING ASSOCIATION AND NO PART OF THE

20 ORGANIZATION'S NET EARNINGS INURES TO THE BENEFIT OF ANY

21 PRIVATE SHAREHOLDER OR INDIVIDUAL. THIS PARAGRAPH DOES

22 NOT APPLY TO AN ORGANIZATION THAT IS OWNED, MANAGED OR

23 CONTROLLED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, BY A MAJOR LEAGUE




Page 118
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 BASEBALL TEAM, OR ITS OWNERS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES OR

2 AGENTS, OR BY A MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL ASSOCIATION OR

3 PROFESSIONAL GOLFING ASSOCIATION, OR ITS OWNERS, OFFICERS,

4 EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS, UNLESS THE ORGANIZATION CONDUCTED

5 OR OPERATED EXHIBITION EVENTS IN THIS STATE BEFORE

6 JANUARY 1, 2018 THAT WERE EXEMPT FROM STATE TRANSACTION

7 PRIVILEGE TAX UNDER A.R.S. SECTION 42-5073.

8 (7) UNTIL MARCH 1, 2017, THE GROSS PROCEEDS OF SALES OR GROSS

9 INCOME DERIVED FROM ENTRY FEES PAID BY PARTICIPANTS FOR

10 EVENTS THAT CONSIST OF A RUN, WALK, SWIM OR BICYCLE RIDE

11 OR A SIMILAR EVENT, OR ANY COMBINATION OF THESE EVENTS.

12 (8) THE GROSS PROCEEDS OF SALES OR GROSS INCOME DERIVED FROM

13 ENTRY FEES PAID BY PARTICIPANTS FOR EVENTS THAT ARE

14 OPERATED OR CONDUCTED BY NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS THAT

15 ARE EXEMPT FROM TAXATION UNDER SECTION 501(c)(3) OF THE

16 INTERNAL REVENUE CODE AND OF WHICH NO PART OF THE

17 ORGANIZATION'S NET EARNINGS INURES TO THE BENEFIT OF ANY

18 PRIVATE SHAREHOLDER OR INDIVIDUAL, IF THE EVENT CONSISTS

19 OF A RUN, WALK, SWIM OR BICYCLE RIDE OR A SIMILAR EVENT, OR

20 ANY COMBINATION OF THESE EVENTS.

21 (9) (RESERVED)

22 (c) The tax imposed by this Section shall not include arranging an amusement activity as a

23 service to a person's customers if that person is not otherwise engaged in the business of




Page 119
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 operating or conducting an amusement themselves or through others. This exception does

2 not apply to businesses that operate or conduct amusements pursuant to customer orders

3 and send the billings and receive the payments associated with that activity, including

4 when the amusement is performed by third party independent contractors. For the

5 purposes of this paragraph, "arranging" includes billing for or collecting amusement

6 charges from a person's customers on behalf of the persons providing the amusement.


8 Section III. Phoenix City Code Section 14-415 is amended as follows, with an effective date

9 of January 1, 2015.


11 Sec. 14-415. Construction contracting: construction contractors.

12 (a) The tax rate shall be at an amount equal to two and three-tenths percent (2.3%) of the

13 gross income from the business upon every construction contractor engaging or

14 continuing in the business activity of construction contracting within the City.

15 (1) However, gross income from construction contracting shall not include charges

16 related to groundwater measuring devices required by A.R.S. Section § 45-604.

17 (2) (Reserved)

18 (3) Gross income from construction contracting shall not include gross income from

19 the sale of manufactured buildings taxable under Section 14-427.

20 (4) For taxable periods beginning from and after July 1, 2008, the portion of gross

21 proceeds of sales or gross income attributable to the actual direct costs of

22 providing architectural or engineering services that are incorporated in a contract




Page 120
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 is not subject to tax under this Section. For the purposes of this subsection, "direct

2 costs" means the portion of the actual costs that are directly expended in

3 providing architectural or engineering services.

4 (5) HANDYMAN EXCLUSION. THIS CLASSIFICATION DOES NOT INCLUDE

5 GROSS INCOME FROM ANY WORK OR OPERATION PERFORMED BY A

6 PERSON THAT IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE LICENSED BY THE

7 REGISTRAR OF CONTRACTORS PURSUANT TO A.R.S. SECTION 32-

8 1121.

9 (b) Deductions and exemptions.

10 (1) Gross income derived from acting as a "subcontractor" shall be exempt from the

11 tax imposed by this Section.

12 (2) All construction contracting gross income subject to the tax and not deductible

13 herein shall be allowed a deduction of thirty-five percent (35%).

14 (3) The gross proceeds of sales or gross income attributable to the purchase of

15 machinery, equipment or other tangible personal property that is exempt from or

16 deductible from privilege or use tax under:

17 (A) Section 14-465, subsections (g) and (p)

18 (B) Section 14-660, subsections (g) and (p);

19 shall be exempt or deductible, respectively, from the tax imposed by this Section.

20 (4) The gross proceeds of sales or gross income that is derived from a contract

21 entered into for the installation, assembly, repair or maintenance of income-

22 producing capital equipment, as defined in Section 14-110, that is deducted from




Page 121
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 the retail classification pursuant to Section 14-465(g), that does not become a

2 permanent attachment to a building, highway, road, railroad, excavation or

3 manufactured building or other structure, project, development or improvement

4 shall be exempt from the tax imposed by this Section. If the ownership of the

5 realty is separate from the ownership of the income-producing capital equipment,

6 the determination as to permanent attachment shall be made as if the ownership

7 was the same. The deduction provided in this paragraph does not include gross

8 proceeds of sales or gross income from that portion of any contracting activity

9 which consists of the development of, or modification to, real property in order to

10 facilitate the installation, assembly, repair, maintenance or removal of the income-

11 producing capital equipment. For purposes of this paragraph, "permanent

12 attachment" means at least one of the following:

13 (A) to be incorporated into real property.

14 (B) to become so affixed to real property that it becomes part of the real

15 property.

16 (C) to be so attached to real property that removal would cause substantial

17 damage to the real property from which it is removed.

18 (5) The gross proceeds of sales or gross income received from a contract for the

19 construction of an environmentally controlled facility for the raising of poultry for

20 the production of eggs and the sorting, or cooling and packaging of eggs shall be

21 exempt from the tax imposed under this Section.

22 (6) The gross proceeds of sales or gross income that is derived from the installation,

23 assembly, repair or maintenance of cleanrooms that are deducted from the tax




Page 122
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 base of the retail classification pursuant to Section 14-465, subsection (g) shall be

2 exempt from the tax imposed under this Section.

3 (7) The gross proceeds of sales or gross income that is derived from a contract

4 entered into with a person who is engaged in the commercial production of

5 livestock, livestock products or agricultural, horticultural, viticultural or

6 floricultural crops or products in this State for the construction, alteration, repair,

7 improvement, movement, wrecking or demolition or addition to or subtraction

8 from any building, highway, road, excavation, manufactured building or other

9 structure, project, development or improvement used directly and primarily to

10 prevent, monitor, control or reduce air, water or land pollution shall be exempt

11 from the tax imposed under this Section.

12 (8) The gross proceeds of sales or gross income received from a post construction

13 contract to perform post-construction treatment of real property for termite and

14 general pest control, including wood destroying organisms, shall be exempt from

15 tax imposed under this Section.

16 (9) Through December 31, 2009, the gross proceeds of sales or gross income received

17 from a contract for constructing any lake facility development in a commercial

18 enhancement reuse district that is designated pursuant to A.R.S. SECTION 9-

19 499.08 if the contractor maintains the following records in a form satisfactory to

20 the Arizona Department of Revenue and to the City:

21 (A) The certificate of qualification of the lake facility development issued by

22 the City pursuant to A.R.S. SECTION 9-499.08, subsection D.




Page 123
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (B) All state and local transaction privilege tax returns for the period of time

2 during which the contractor received gross proceeds of sales or gross

3 income from a contract to construct a lake facility development in a

4 designated commercial enhancement reuse district, showing the amount

5 exempted from state and local taxation.

6 (C) Any other information considered to be necessary.

7 (10) Any amount attributable to development fees that are incurred in relation to the

8 construction, development or improvement of real property and paid by the

9 taxpayer as defined in the model city tax code or by a contractor providing

10 services to the taxpayer. For the purposes of this paragraph:

11 (A) the attributable amount shall not exceed the value of the development fees

12 actually imposed.

13 (B) the attributable amount is equal to the total amount of development fees

14 paid by the taxpayer or by a contractor providing services to the taxpayer

15 and the total development fees credited in exchange for the construction

16 of, contribution to or dedication of real property for providing public

17 infrastructure, public safety or other public services necessary to the

18 development. The real property must be the subject of the development

19 fees.

20 (C) “development fees" means fees imposed to offset capital costs of

21 providing public infrastructure, public safety or other public services to a

22 development and authorized pursuant to A.R.S. Section 9-463.05, A.R.S.




Page 124
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 Section 11-1102 or A.R.S. Title 48 regardless of the jurisdiction to which

2 the fees are paid.

3 (11) For taxable periods beginning from and after July 1, 2008 and ending before

4 January 1, 2017, the gross proceeds of sales or gross income derived from a

5 contract to provide and install a solar energy device. The contractor shall register

6 with the department of revenue as a solar energy contractor. By registering, the

7 contractor acknowledges that it will make its books and records relating to sales

8 of solar energy devices available to the department of revenue and the city, as

9 applicable, for examination.

10 (12) THE GROSS PROCEEDS OF SALES OR GROSS INCOME DERIVED FROM

11 A CONTRACT WITH THE OWNER OF REAL PROPERTY OR

12 IMPROVEMENTS TO REAL PROPERTY FOR THE MAINTENANCE,

13 REPAIR, REPLACEMENT OR ALTERATION OF EXISTING PROPERTY IS

14 NOT SUBJECT TO TAX UNDER THIS SECTION IF THE CONTRACT DOES

15 NOT INCLUDE MODIFICATION ACTIVITIES, EXCEPT AS SPECIFIED IN

16 THIS PARAGRAPH. THE GROSS PROCEEDS OF SALES OR GROSS

17 INCOME DERIVED FROM A DE MINIMIS AMOUNT OF MODIFICATION

18 ACTIVITY DOES NOT SUBJECT THE CONTRACT OR ANY PART OF THE

19 CONTRACT TO TAX UNDER THIS SECTION. FOR THE PURPOSES OF

20 THIS PARAGRAPH:

21 (A) ANY TERM NOT DEFINED IN THIS PARAGRAPH THAT IS

22 DEFINED IN A.R.S. SECTION 42-5075 HAS THE SAME MEANING

23 PRESCRIBED IN A.R.S. SECTION 42-5075.




Page 125
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (B) TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY THAT IS INCORPORATED OR

2 FABRICATED INTO A PROJECT DESCRIBED IN THIS

3 SUBSECTION MAY BE SUBJECT TO THE AMOUNT PRESCRIBED

4 IN SECTION 14-415.1.

5 (C) EACH CONTRACT IS INDEPENDENT OF ANY OTHER

6 CONTRACT, EXCEPT THAT ANY CHANGE ORDER THAT

7 DIRECTLY RELATES TO THE SCOPE OF WORK OF THE

8 ORIGINAL CONTRACT SHALL BE TREATED THE SAME AS THE

9 ORIGINAL CONTRACT UNDER THIS CHAPTER, REGARDLESS OF

10 THE AMOUNT OF MODIFICATION ACTIVITIES INCLUDED IN

11 THE CHANGE ORDER. IF A CHANGE ORDER DOES NOT

12 DIRECTLY RELATE TO THE SCOPE OF WORK OF THE ORIGINAL

13 CONTRACT, THE CHANGE ORDER SHALL BE TREATED AS A

14 NEW CONTRACT, WITH THE TAX TREATMENT OF ANY

15 SUBSEQUENT CHANGE ORDER TO FOLLOW THE TAX

16 TREATMENT OF THE CONTRACT TO WHICH THE SCOPE OF

17 WORK OF THE SUBSEQUENT CHANGE ORDER DIRECTLY

18 RELATES.

19 (D) THIS PARAGRAPH DOES NOT APPLY TO A CONTRACT THAT

20 PRIMARILY INVOLVES SURFACE OR SUBSURFACE

21 IMPROVEMENTS TO LAND AND THAT IS SUBJECT TO A.R.S.

22 TITLE 28, CHAPTER 19, 20 OR 22 OR A.R.S. TITLE 34, CHAPTER 2

23 OR 6 EVEN IF THE CONTRACT ALSO INCLUDES VERTICAL




Page 126
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 IMPROVEMENTS. IF A CITY OR TOWN IMPOSES A TAX ON

2 CONTRACTS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO PROCUREMENT

3 PROCESSES UNDER THOSE PROVISIONS, THE CITY OR TOWN

4 SHALL INCLUDE IN THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS A NOTICE

5 TO BIDDERS WHEN THOSE PROJECTS ARE SUBJECT TO THE

6 TAX. THIS SUBDIVISION DOES NOT APPLY TO CONTRACTS

7 WITH:

8 (i) COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS, FIRE DISTRICTS,

9 COUNTY TELEVISION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS,

10 COMMUNITY PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS, COTTON

11 PEST CONTROL DISTRICTS, HOSPITAL DISTRICTS, PEST

12 ABATEMENT DISTRICTS, HEALTH SERVICE DISTRICTS,

13 AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS, COUNTY

14 FREE LIBRARY DISTRICTS, COUNTY JAIL DISTRICTS,

15 COUNTY STADIUM DISTRICTS, SPECIAL HEALTH CARE

16 DISTRICTS, PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES DISTRICTS,

17 THEME PARK DISTRICTS, REGIONAL ATTRACTION

18 DISTRICTS OR REVITALIZATION DISTRICTS.

19 (ii) ANY SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT NOT SPECIFIED IN ITEM

20 (i) OF THIS SUBDIVISION IF THE DISTRICT DOES NOT

21 SUBSTANTIALLY ENGAGE IN THE MODIFICATION,

22 MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, REPLACEMENT OR




Page 127
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 ALTERATION OF SURFACE OR SUBSURFACE

2 IMPROVEMENTS TO LAND.

3 (13) THE GROSS PROCEEDS OF SALES OR GROSS INCOME DERIVED FROM

4 A CONTRACT ENTERED INTO FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MIXED

5 WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY THAT IS LOCATED ON A MUNICIPAL

6 SOLID WASTE LANDFILL AND THAT IS CONSTRUCTED FOR THE

7 PURPOSE OF RECYCLING SOLID WASTE OR PRODUCING RENEWABLE

8 ENERGY FROM LANDFILL WASTE. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS

9 PARAGRAPH:

10 (A) "MIXED WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY" MEANS A SOLID

11 WASTE FACILITY THAT IS OWNED, OPERATED OR USED FOR

12 THE TREATMENT, PROCESSING OR DISPOSAL OF SOLID

13 WASTE, RECYCLABLE SOLID WASTE, CONDITIONALLY

14 EXEMPT SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR WASTE OR

15 HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE. FOR THE PURPOSES OF

16 THIS SUBDIVISION, "CONDITIONALLY EXEMPT SMALL

17 QUANTITY GENERATOR WASTE", "HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS

18 WASTE" AND "SOLID WASTE FACILITY" HAVE THE SAME

19 MEANINGS PRESCRIBED IN A.R.S. SECTION 49-701, EXCEPT

20 THAT SOLID WASTE FACILITY DOES INCLUDE A SITE THAT

21 STORES, TREATS OR PROCESSES PAPER, GLASS, WOOD,

22 CARDBOARD, HOUSEHOLD TEXTILES, SCRAP METAL, PLASTIC,




Page 128
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 VEGETATIVE WASTE, ALUMINUM, STEEL OR OTHER

2 RECYCLABLE MATERIAL.

3 (B) "MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL" HAS THE SAME

4 MEANING PRESCRIBED IN A.R.S. SECTION 49-701.

5 (C) "RECYCLING" MEANS COLLECTING, SEPARATING, CLEANSING,

6 TREATING AND RECONSTITUTING RECYCLABLE SOLID WASTE

7 THAT WOULD OTHERWISE BECOME SOLID WASTE, BUT DOES

8 NOT INCLUDE INCINERATION OR OTHER SIMILAR PROCESSES.

9 (D) RENEWABLE ENERGY" HAS THE SAME MEANING PRESCRIBED

10 IN A.R.S. SECTION 41-1511.

11 (c) "Subcontractor" means a construction contractor performing work for either:

12 (1) a construction contractor who has provided the subcontractor with a written

13 declaration that he is liable for the tax for the project and has provided the

14 subcontractor his City Privilege License number.

15 (2) an owner-builder who has provided the subcontractor with a written declaration

16 that:

17 (A) the owner-builder is improving the property for sale; and

18 (B) the owner-builder is liable for the tax for such construction contracting

19 activity; and

20 (C) the owner-builder has provided the contractor his City Privilege License

21 number.




Page 129
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (3) a person selling new manufactured buildings who has provided the subcontractor

2 with a written declaration that he is liable for the tax for the site preparation and

3 set-up; and provided the subcontractor his City Privilege License number.

4 Subcontractor also includes a construction contractor performing work for another

5 subcontractor as defined above.


7 Section IV. Phoenix City Code Section 14-415.1 is adopted as follows, with an effective date

8 of January 1, 2015.


10 Sec. 14-415.1. LIABILITY FOR MRRA AMOUNTS, EQUAL TO RETAIL

11 TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE TAX DUE.

12 (A) PERSON THAT IS EITHER A PRIME CONTRACTOR SUBJECT TO TAX UNDER

13 SECTION 14-415 OR A SUBCONTRACTOR WORKING UNDER THE CONTROL

14 OF SUCH A PRIME CONTRACTOR, THAT PURCHASES TANGIBLE PERSONAL

15 PROPERTY, THE PURCHASE PRICE OF WHICH WAS EXCLUDED FROM THE

16 TAX BASE UNDER THE RETAIL CLASSIFICATION UNDER SECTION 14-465(K)

17 OR WAS EXCLUDED FROM THE USE TAX UNDER SECTION 14-660(K) AT THE

18 TIME OF PURCHASE, AND THAT INCORPORATES OR FABRICATES THE

19 TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY INTO A PROJECT DESCRIBED IN SECTION

20 14-415(B)(12) AND A.R.S. SECTION 42-5075, SUBSECTION O IS LIABLE FOR AN

21 AMOUNT EQUAL TO ANY TAX THAT A SELLER WOULD HAVE BEEN




Page 130
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 REQUIRED TO PAY UNDER SECTION 14-460 AND A.R.S. TITLE 42, CHAPTER 5

2 AS FOLLOWS:

3 (1) THE AMOUNT OF LIABILITY SHALL BE CALCULATED AND

4 REPORTED BASED ON THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT AND THE

5 TAXES IMPOSED UNDER SECTION 14-460 AND A.R.S. TITLE 42,

6 CHAPTER 5.

7 (2) ALL DEDUCTIONS, EXEMPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS FOR THE COST

8 OF TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY PROVIDED IN SECTION 14-415

9 APPLY TO THE TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY INCORPORATED OR

10 FABRICATED INTO THE PROJECT.

11 (3) THIS SUBSECTION DOES NOT APPLY TO TANGIBLE PERSONAL

12 PROPERTY THAT IS INCORPORATED OR FABRICATED INTO ANY

13 PROJECT UNDER A CONTRACT THAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE

14 EXCLUDED FROM THE TAX BASE UNDER SECTION 14-415, WITHOUT

15 REGARD TO SECTION 14-415(B)(12).

16 (4) THE AMOUNT OF LIABILITY SHALL BE REPORTED WITHIN THE

17 REPORTING PERIOD THAT INCLUDES THE MONTH IN WHICH THE

18 PERSON INCORPORATES OR FABRICATES THE TANGIBLE PERSONAL

19 PROPERTY INTO THE PROJECT.

20 (5) THE PERSON IS NOT LIABLE FOR THE AMOUNT IF THE CONTRACTOR

21 WHO HIRED THE PERSON EXECUTES AND PROVIDES TO THE PERSON

22 A CERTIFICATE STATING THAT THE CONTRACTOR PROVIDING THE

23 CERTIFICATE IS LIABLE FOR ANY AMOUNT DUE UNDER THIS




Page 131
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 SUBSECTION. THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE SHALL PRESCRIBE

2 THE FORM OF THE CERTIFICATE. IF THE PERSON HAS REASON TO

3 BELIEVE THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THE

4 CERTIFICATE IS ERRONEOUS OR INCOMPLETE, THE CITY MAY

5 DISREGARD THE CERTIFICATE. THE CONTRACTOR PROVIDING THE

6 CERTIFICATE IS LIABLE FOR THE AMOUNT THAT OTHERWISE

7 WOULD BE DUE FROM THE PERSON UNDER THIS SUBSECTION.

8 (B) PERSON THAT PURCHASED TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY, THE

9 PURCHASE PRICE OF WHICH WAS EXCLUDED FROM THE TAX BASE UNDER

10 SECTION 14-465(K) OR WAS EXCLUDED FROM THE USE TAX UNDER

11 SECTION 14-660(K) AT THE TIME OF PURCHASE, WHOSE TRANSACTION

12 PRIVILEGE TAX LICENSE HAS BEEN CANCELED AND THAT SUBSEQUENTLY

13 USES, CONSUMES, SELLS OR DISCARDS THE TANGIBLE PERSONAL

14 PROPERTY IS LIABLE FOR AN AMOUNT OF TAX DETERMINED UNDER THIS

15 SUBSECTION. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SUBSECTION:

16 (1) IF THE TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY IS INCORPORATED OR

17 FABRICATED INTO A PROJECT DESCRIBED IN SECTION 14-415(B)(12)

18 AND A.R.S. SECTION 42-5075, SUBSECTION O, OR OTHERWISE USED

19 OR CONSUMED BY THE PERSON, THE AMOUNT OF LIABILITY SHALL

20 BE CALCULATED AND REPORTED BASED ON THE PERSON'S

21 PURCHASE PRICE OF THE TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY, THE

22 LOCATION OF THE PROJECT, USE OR CONSUMPTION AND THE TAXES

23 IMPOSED UNDER SECTION 14-460 AND A.R.S. TITLE 42, CHAPTER 5.




Page 132
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (2) IF THE TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY IS SOLD IN A MANNER THAT

2 IS NOT SUBJECT TO TAX UNDER THIS CHAPTER OR IS DISCARDED,

3 THE AMOUNT SHALL BE CALCULATED AND REPORTED BASED ON

4 THE PAYMENT RECEIVED BY THE PERSON, THE LOCATION OF THE

5 PERSON'S PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IN THIS STATE AND THE

6 TAXES IMPOSED UNDER SECTION 14-460 AND A.R.S. TITLE 42,

7 CHAPTER 5.

8 (3) THE PERSON IS NOT LIABLE UNDER THIS SUBSECTION FOR ANY

9 AMOUNT IF THE PERSON DISCARDS THE TANGIBLE PERSONAL

10 PROPERTY AND DOES NOT RECEIVE PAYMENT OF ANY KIND.

11 (4) THE AMOUNT OF LIABILITY SHALL BE REPORTED ON OR BEFORE

12 THE BUSINESS DAY PRECEDING THE LAST BUSINESS DAY OF THE

13 MONTH FOLLOWING THE MONTH IN WHICH THE PERSON USES THE

14 TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY IN A MANNER DESCRIBED IN

15 PARAGRAPH 1 OR 2 OF THIS SUBSECTION. NO AMOUNT IS DUE

16 UNDER THIS SUBSECTION AT ANY TIME THAT THE PERSON STORES

17 THE TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY WITHOUT USING IT IN A

18 MANNER DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPH 1 OR 2 OF THIS SUBSECTION.

19 (5) ALL DEDUCTIONS, EXEMPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS FOR THE COST

20 OF TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY PROVIDED IN SECTION 14-415

21 APPLY TO THE TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY INCORPORATED OR

22 FABRICATED INTO A PROJECT DESCRIBED IN SECTION 14-415(B)(12)

23 AND A.R.S. SECTION 42-5075, SUBSECTION O.




Page 133
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (6) THIS SUBSECTION DOES NOT APPLY TO TANGIBLE PERSONAL

2 PROPERTY THAT IS INCORPORATED OR FABRICATED INTO ANY

3 PROJECT UNDER A CONTRACT THAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE

4 EXCLUDED FROM THE TAX BASE UNDER SECTION 14-415 AND A.R.S.

5 SECTION 42-5075, WITHOUT REGARD TO SECTION 14-415(B)(12) AND

6 A.R.S. SECTION 42-5075, SUBSECTION O.

7 (7) THE PERSON IS NOT LIABLE FOR THE AMOUNT IF THE CONTRACTOR

8 WHO HIRED THE PERSON EXECUTES AND PROVIDES TO THE PERSON

9 A CERTIFICATE STATING THAT THE CONTRACTOR PROVIDING THE

10 CERTIFICATE IS LIABLE FOR ANY AMOUNT DUE UNDER THIS

11 SUBSECTION FOR TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY INCORPORATED

12 OR FABRICATED INTO A PROJECT DESCRIBED IN A.R.S. SECTION 42-

13 5075, SUBSECTION O. THE DEPARTMENT SHALL PRESCRIBE THE

14 FORM OF THE CERTIFICATE. IF THE PERSON HAS REASON TO

15 BELIEVE THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THE

16 CERTIFICATE IS ERRONEOUS OR INCOMPLETE, THE DEPARTMENT

17 MAY DISREGARD THE CERTIFICATE. THE CONTRACTOR PROVIDING

18 THE CERTIFICATE IS LIABLE FOR THE AMOUNT THAT OTHERWISE

19 WOULD BE DUE FROM THE PERSON UNDER THIS SUBSECTION.

20 (C) PERSON THAT FAILS TO REPORT OR PAY ANY AMOUNT DUE UNDER

21 SUBSECTION A OR B OF THIS SECTION IS LIABLE FOR INTEREST IN A

22 MANNER CONSISTENT WITH A.R.S. SECTION 42-1123 AND PENALTIES IN A

23 MANNER CONSISTENT WITH A.R.S. SECTION 42-1125.




Page 134
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (D) IF A PERSON HAS PAID AN AMOUNT DESCRIBED IN THIS SECTION ON

2 TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY THAT THE PERSON REASONABLY

3 BELIEVED TO BE DESCRIBED UNDER SECTION 14-415(B)(12) AND A.R.S.

4 SECTION 42-5075, SUBSECTION O AND A FINAL DETERMINATION IS MADE

5 THAT SECTION 14-415(B)(12) AND A.R.S. SECTION 42-5075, SUBSECTION O

6 DOES NOT APPLY, THE PERSON IS ENTITLED TO AN OFFSET FOR THE

7 AMOUNT PAID UNDER THIS SECTION AGAINST THE AMOUNT OF TAX

8 LIABILITY ASSESSED UNDER THIS CHAPTER.


10 Section V. Phoenix City Code Section 14-422 is amended as follows, with an effective date

11 of December 1, 2017.


13 Sec. 14-422. Jet fuel sales.

14 (a) The tax rate shall be at an amount of 0.732 cents per gallon sold from the business

15 activity upon every person engaging or continuing in the business of selling jet fuel.

16 (1) Gallons sold includes all gallons sold, bartered, exchanged, included as part or

17 whole of a trade-out, or similar transactions regardless of the type or form of

18 payment.

19 (2) For purposes of this Section the following terms are substitutable in Articles III

20 and V of this chapter, and corresponding regulations:

21 (A) "gallons" for "gross income"




Page 135
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (B) "gallon(s)" for "amount(s)".

2 (b) The burden of proving that a sale of jet fuel is not a taxable sale shall be upon the person

3 who made the sale.

4 (c) When this city and another Arizona city or town with an equivalent excise tax could

5 claim nexus for taxing a jet fuel sale, the city or town where the permanent business

6 location of the seller at which the order was received shall be deemed to have precedence,

7 and for the purposes of this chapter such city or town has sole and exclusive right to such

8 tax.

9 (d) The appropriate tax liability for any jet fuel sale where the order is received at a

10 permanent business location of the seller located in this city or in an Arizona city or town

11 that levies an equivalent excise tax shall be at the rate of the city or town of such seller's

12 location.

13 (E) THE APPLICATION OF THE TAX IS LIMITED TO AMOUNTS OF NOT MORE

14 THAN TEN MILLION GALLONS OF JET FUEL PURCHASED BY EACH

15 PURCHASER IN EACH CALENDAR YEAR. PURCHASES IN EXCESS OF TEN

16 MILLION GALLONS PER PURCHASER PER YEAR ARE EXEMPT.

17 (F) BEGINNING FROM AND AFTER NOVEMBER 30, 2017, THE REVENUES

18 GENERATED BY EACH PUBLIC AIRPORT MUST BE SEGREGATED IN

19 SEPARATE ACCOUNTS FOR THE EXCLUSIVE EXPENDITURE FOR THE

20 CAPITAL OR OPERATING COSTS OF THE AIRPORT, THE AIRPORT SYSTEM

21 OR OTHER LOCAL AIRPORT FACILITIES OWNED OR OPERATED BY THE




Page 136
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 MUNICIPALITY AND DIRECTLY AND SUBSTANTIALLY RELATED TO THE

2 AIR TRANSPORTATION OF PASSENGERS OR PROPERTY.

3 (G) Exemptions. Notwithstanding Section 14-400(d), the exemptions in Section 14-465(a),

4 (b) and (d) through (z) will apply to sales of jet fuel taxed under this Section.


6 Section VI. Phoenix City Code Section 14-445 is amended as follows, with the following

7 effective dates per subsection: (d) & (k) January 1, 2018; (i) & Footnote January 1, 2012.

8 Sec. 14-445. Rental, leasing, and licensing for use of real property.

9 (a) The tax rate shall be at an amount equal to two and three-tenths percent (2.3%) of the

10 gross income from the business activity upon every person engaging or continuing in the

11 business of leasing or renting real property located within the City for a consideration, to

12 the tenant in actual possession, or the licensing for use of real property to the final

13 licensee located within the City for a consideration including any improvements, rights,

14 or interest in such property; provided further that:

15 (1) Payments made by the lessee to, or on behalf of, the lessor for property taxes,

16 repairs, or improvements are considered to be part of the taxable gross income.

17 (2) Charges for such items as telecommunications, utilities, pet fees, or maintenance

18 are considered to be part of the taxable gross income.

19 (3) However, if the lessor engages in telecommunication activity, as evidenced by

20 installing individual metering equipment and by billing each tenant based upon

21 actual usage, such activity is taxable under Section 14-470.




Page 137
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (b) If individual utility meters have been installed for each tenant and the lessor separately

2 charges each single tenant for the exact billing from the utility company, such charges are

3 exempt.

4 (c) Charges by a qualifying hospital, qualifying community health center or a qualifying

5 health care organization to patients of such facilities for use of rooms or other real

6 property during the course of their treatment by such facilities are exempt.

7 (d) Charges for joint pole usage by a person engaged in the business of providing or

8 furnishing utility or telecommunication services OR THAT IS A CABLE OPERATOR,

9 OR CHARGES FOR JOINT POLE USAGE to A person engaged in the business of

10 providing or furnishing utility or telecommunication services OR THAT IS A CABLE

11 OPERATOR are exempt from the tax imposed by this Section. “CABLE OPERATOR”

12 HAS THE SAME MEANING AS PRESCRIBED BY A.R.S. SECTION 9-505.

13 (e) Exempt from the tax imposed by this Section is gross income derived from the rental,

14 leasing, or licensing for use of real property to a qualifying hospital, qualifying

15 community health center or a qualifying health care organization, except when the

16 property so rented, leased, or licensed is for use in activities resulting in gross income

17 from unrelated business income as that term is defined in 26 U.S.C. Section 512.

18 (f) A person who has less than three (3) apartments, houses, trailer spaces, or other lodging

19 spaces rented, leased or licensed or available for rent, lease, or license within the State

20 and no units of commercial property for rent, lease, or license within the State, is not

21 deemed to be in the rental business, and is therefore exempt from the tax imposed by this

22 Section on such income. However, a person who has one (1) or more units of commercial




Page 138
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 property is subject to the tax imposed by this Section on rental, lease and license income

2 from all such lodging spaces and commercial units of real estate even though said person

3 may have fewer than three (3) lodging spaces.

4 (g) (Reserved)

5 (h) (Reserved)

6 (i) EXEMPT FROM THE TAX IMPOSED BY THIS SECTION IS THE GROSS INCOME

7 DERIVED FROM PAYMENTS MADE PURSUANT TO A LIFE CARE CONTRACT

8 BY A RESIDENT TO A PROVIDER THAT HOLDS A PERMIT TO ENTER INTO

9 LIFE CARE CONTRACTS ISSUED BY THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF

10 INSURANCE. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PARAGRAPH, "LIFE CARE

11 CONTRACT", "PROVIDER" AND "RESIDENT" HAVE THE SAME MEANINGS

12 PRESCRIBED IN A.R.S. SECTION 20-1801.

13 (j) Exempt from the tax imposed by this Section is gross income derived from the activities

14 taxable under Section 14-444 of this code.

15 (k) LEASING OR RENTING REAL PROPERTY OR THE RIGHT TO USE REAL

16 PROPERTY AT EXHIBITION EVENTS IN THIS STATE SPONSORED, OPERATED

17 OR CONDUCTED BY A NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION THAT IS EXEMPT FROM

18 TAXATION UNDER SECTION 501(C)(3), 501(C)(4) OR 501(C)(6) OF THE

19 INTERNAL REVENUE CODE IF THE ORGANIZATION IS ASSOCIATED WITH

20 MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL TEAMS OR A NATIONAL TOURING

21 PROFESSIONAL GOLFING ASSOCIATION AND NO PART OF THE

22 ORGANIZATION'S NET EARNINGS INURES TO THE BENEFIT OF ANY




Page 139
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 PRIVATE SHAREHOLDER OR INDIVIDUAL. THIS PARAGRAPH DOES NOT

2 APPLY TO AN ORGANIZATION THAT IS OWNED, MANAGED OR

3 CONTROLLED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, BY A MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL

4 TEAM, OR ITS OWNERS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS, OR BY A

5 MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL ASSOCIATION OR PROFESSIONAL GOLFING

6 ASSOCIATION, OR ITS OWNERS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS,

7 UNLESS THE ORGANIZATION CONDUCTED OR OPERATED EXHIBITION

8 EVENTS IN THIS STATE BEFORE JANUARY 1, 2018 THAT WERE EXEMPT

9 FROM TAXATION UNDER A.R.S. SECTION 42-5073.

10 (l) (Reserved)

11 (m) (Reserved)

12 (n) Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 14-200(b), the fair market value of one (1)

13 apartment, in an apartment complex provided rent free to an employee of the apartment

14 complex is not subject to the tax imposed by this Section. For an apartment complex with

15 more than fifty (50) units, an additional apartment provided rent free to an employee for

16 every additional fifty (50) units is not subject to the tax imposed by this Section.

17 (o) Income derived from incarcerating or detaining prisoners who are under the jurisdiction

18 of the United States, this State or any other state or a political subdivision of this State or

19 of any other state in a privately-operated prison, jail or detention facility is exempt from

20 the tax imposed by this Section.




Page 140
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (p) Charges by any hospital, any licensed nursing care institution, or any kidney dialysis

2 facility to patients of such facilities for the use of rooms or other real property during the

3 course of their treatment by such facilities are exempt.

4 (q) Charges to patients receiving "personal care" or "directed care", by any licensed assisted

5 living facility, licensed assisted living center or licensed assisted living home as defined

6 and licensed pursuant to Chapter 4 Title 36 Arizona Revised Statutes and Title 9 of the

7 Arizona Administrative Code are exempt.

8 (r) Income received from the rental of any "low-income unit" as established under Section

9 42 of the Internal Revenue Code, including the low-income housing credit provided by

10 IRC Section 42, to the extent that the collection of tax on rental income causes the "gross

11 rent" defined by IRC Section 42 to exceed the income limitation for the low-income unit

12 is exempt. This exemption also applies to income received from the rental of individual

13 rental units subject to statutory or regulatory "low-income unit" rent restrictions similar to

14 IRC Section 42 to the extent that the collection of tax from the tenant causes the rental

15 receipts to exceed a rent restriction for the low-income unit. This subsection also applies

16 to rent received by a person other than the owner or lessor of the low-income unit,

17 including a broker. This subsection does not apply unless a taxpayer maintains the

18 documentation to support the qualification of a unit as a low-income unit, the "gross rent"

19 limitation for the unit and the rent received from that unit.

20 (s) The gross proceeds of a commercial lease of real property between affiliated companies,

21 businesses, persons or reciprocal insurers are exempt. For the purposes of this paragraph:




Page 141
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (1) "affiliated companies, businesses, persons or reciprocal insurers" means the lessor

2 holds a controlling interest in the lessee, the lessee holds a controlling interest in

3 the lessor, an affiliated entity holds a controlling interest in both the lessor and the

4 lessee or an unrelated person holds a controlling interest in both the lessor and

5 lessee.

6 (2) "controlling interest" means direct or indirect ownership of at least eighty (80) per

7 cent of the voting shares of a corporation or of the interests in a company,

8 business or person other than a corporation.

9 (3) "reciprocal insurer" has the same meaning as prescribed in A.R.S. Section 20-762

10 Arizona Revised Statutes.


12 FOOTNOTE TO SECTION 14-445. Retroactivity; refunds; nonseverability pertaining to

13 Section 445.

14 A. The transaction privilege tax exemption for gross income derived from payments made

15 pursuant to a life care contract by a resident to a provider as provided in Model City Tax

16 Code Section 445(i) applies retroactively to taxable periods beginning from and after

17 January 1, 2012.

18 B. Any claim for refund of transaction privilege tax based on the retroactive application of

19 Model City Tax Code Section 445(i) shall be submitted to the Department of Revenue on

20 or before December 31, 2019, pursuant to section 42-1118, Arizona Revised Statutes. A

21 failure to file a claim on or before December 31, 2019 constitutes a waiver of the claim

22 for refund under this section.




Page 142
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 C. The burden is on the taxpayer to establish by competent evidence the amount of tax paid

2 for all taxable periods and the amount, if any, attributable to gross income derived from

3 payments made pursuant to a life care contract by a resident to a provider that qualify for

4 exemption under the amendment to Model City Tax Code Section 445, as provided by

5 this act. The Department of Revenue shall:

6 1. Review all timely filed claims.

7 2. Determine, on audit if necessary, the correct amount of each claim.

8 3. Notify the taxpayer of its determination. The notice is final unless a taxpayer

9 appeals in the manner provided in section 42-1251, Arizona Revised Statutes.

10 D. Notwithstanding section 42-1119, Arizona Revised Statutes, the Department of Revenue

11 may not make a refund until after determination of the amount of all refund claims filed

12 pursuant to this section. If a taxpayer appeals the Department's determination, the

13 Department, pursuant to the rules protecting confidentiality under Title 42, Chapter 2,

14 Article 1, Arizona Revised Statutes, may notify other taxpayers who have filed claims as

15 to the nature of any delay and, if possible, estimate the possible extent of the delay.

16 E. The aggregate amount of refunds under this section may not exceed ten thousand dollars

17 ($10,000). If the aggregate amount of claims under this section that are ultimately

18 determined to be correct exceeds ten thousand dollars, the Department of Revenue shall

19 reduce each claim proportionately so that the total refund amount equals ten thousand

20 dollars.




Page 143
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 F. Interest may not be allowed or compounded on any refundable amount if paid before July

2 1, 2020, but if the amount cannot be determined or paid until after June 30, 2020, interest

3 accrues from and after July 1, 2020 under section 42-1123, Arizona Revised Statutes.

4 G. If any part of this section is finally adjudicated to be invalid, this entire section is void.

5 The provisions of this section are intended to be nonseverable.


7 Section VII. Phoenix City Code Section 14-450 is amended as follows, with an effective

8 date of August 1, 2015.


10 Sec. 14-450. Rental, leasing, and licensing for use of tangible personal property.


12 (a) The tax rate shall be at an amount equal to two and three-tenths percent (2.3%) of the

13 gross income from the business activity upon every person engaging or continuing in the

14 business of leasing, licensing for use, or renting tangible personal property for a

15 consideration, including that which is semi-permanently or permanently installed within

16 the City as provided by Regulation.

17 (b) Special provisions relating to long-term motor vehicle leases. A lease transaction

18 involving a motor vehicle for a minimum period of twenty-four (24) months shall be

19 considered to have occurred at the location of the motor vehicle dealership, rather than

20 the location of the place of business of the lessor, even if the lessor's interest in the lease

21 and its proceeds are sold, transferred, or otherwise assigned to a lease financing




Page 144
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 institution; provided further that the city or town where such motor vehicle dealership is

2 located levies a Privilege Tax or an equivalent excise tax upon the transaction.

3 (c) Gross income derived from the following transactions shall be exempt from Privilege

4 Taxes imposed by this Section:

5 (1) rental, leasing, or licensing for use of tangible personal property to persons

6 engaged or continuing in the business of leasing, licensing for use, or rental of

7 such property.

8 (2) rental, leasing, or licensing for use of tangible personal property that is semi-

9 permanently or permanently installed within another city or town that levies an

10 equivalent excise tax on the transaction.

11 (3) rental, leasing, or licensing for use of film, tape, or slides to a theater or other

12 person taxed under Section 14-410, or to a radio station, television station, or

13 subscription television system.

14 (4) rental, leasing, or licensing for use of the following:

15 (A) prosthetics.

16 (B) income-producing capital equipment.

17 (C) mining and metallurgical supplies.

18 These exemptions include the rental, leasing, or licensing for use of tangible

19 personal property which, if it had been purchased instead of leased, rented, or

20 licensed by the lessee or licensee, would qualify as income-producing capital

21 equipment or mining and metallurgical supplies.




Page 145
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (5) rental, leasing, or licensing for use of tangible personal property to a qualifying

2 hospital, qualifying community health center or a qualifying health care

3 organization, except when the property so rented, leased, or licensed is for use in

4 activities resulting in gross income from unrelated business income as that term is

5 defined in 26 U.S.C. Section 512 or rental, leasing, or licensing for use of tangible

6 personal property in this State by a nonprofit charitable organization that has

7 qualified under Section 501(c)(3) of the United States Internal Revenue Code and

8 that engages in and uses such property exclusively for training, job placement or

9 rehabilitation programs or testing for mentally or physically handicapped persons.

10 (6) separately billed charges for delivery, installation, repair, and/or maintenance as

11 provided by Regulation.

12 (7) charges for joint pole usage by a person engaged in the business of providing or

13 furnishing utility or telecommunication services OR THAT IS A CABLE

14 OPERATOR, OR CHARGES FOR JOINT POLE USAGE to A person engaged

15 in the business of providing or furnishing utility or telecommunication services

16 OR THAT IS A CABLE OPERATOR. “CABLE OPERATOR” HAS THE

17 SAME MEANING AS PRESCRIBED BY A.R.S. SECTION 9-505.

18 (8) the gross income from coin-operated washing, drying, and dry cleaning machines,

19 or from coin-operated car washing machines. This exemption shall not apply to

20 suppliers or distributors renting, leasing, or licensing for use of such equipment to

21 persons engaged in the operation of coin-operated washing, drying, dry cleaning,

22 or car washing establishments.




Page 146
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (9) rental, leasing, or licensing of aircraft that would qualify as aircraft acquired for

2 use outside the State, as prescribed by Regulation, if such rental, leasing, or

3 licensing had been a sale.

4 (10) rental, leasing and licensing for use of an alternative fuel vehicle if such vehicle

5 was manufactured as a diesel fuel vehicle and converted to operate on alternative

6 fuel and equipment that is installed in a conventional diesel fuel motor vehicle to

7 convert the vehicle to operate on an alternative fuel, as defined in A.R.S. Section

8 1-215.

9 (11) rental, leasing, and licensing for use of solar energy devices, for taxable periods

10 beginning from and after July 1, 2008. The lessor shall register with the

11 Department of Revenue as a solar energy retailer. By registering, the lessor

12 acknowledges that it will make its books and records relating to leases of solar

13 energy devices available to the Department of Revenue and City, as applicable,

14 for examination.

15 (12) leasing or renting certified ignition interlock devices installed pursuant to the

16 requirements prescribed by A.R.S. Section 28-1461. For the purposes of this

17 paragraph, "certified ignition interlock device" has the same meaning prescribed

18 in A.R.S. Section 28-1301.


20 Section VIII. Phoenix City Code Section 14-455 is amended as follows with the following

21 effective dates per subsection: (f) January 1, 2015; (g) January 1, 2018; (h) August 3, 2018.





Page 147
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 Sec. 14-455. Restaurants and Bars.


3 (a) The tax rate shall be at an amount equal to two and three-tenths percent (2.3%) of the

4 gross income from the business activity upon every person engaging or continuing in the

5 business of preparing or serving food or beverage in a bar, cocktail lounge, restaurant, or

6 similar establishment where articles of food or drink are prepared or served for

7 consumption on or off the premises, including also the activity of catering. Cover charges

8 and minimum charges must be included in the gross income of this business activity.

9 (b) Caterers and other taxpayers subject to the tax who deliver food and/or serve such food

10 off premises, shall also be allowed to exclude separately charged delivery, set-up, and

11 clean-up charges, provided that the charges are also maintained separately in the books

12 and records. When a taxpayer delivers food and/or serves such food off premises, his

13 regular business location shall still be deemed the location of the transaction for the

14 purposes of the tax imposed by this Section.

15 (c) The tax imposed by this Section shall not apply to sales to a qualifying hospital,

16 qualifying community health center or a qualifying health care organization, except when

17 sold for use in activities resulting in gross income from unrelated business income as that

18 term is defined in 26 U.S.C. Section 512.

19 (d) The tax imposed by this Section shall not apply to sales of food, beverages, condiments

20 and accessories used for serving food and beverages to a commercial airline, as defined

21 in A.R.S. SECTION 42-5061, that serves the food and beverages to its passengers,

22 without additional charge, for consumption in flight.




Page 148
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (e) The tax imposed by this Section shall not apply to sales of prepared food, beverages,

2 condiments or accessories to a public educational entity, pursuant to any of the provisions

3 of Title 15, Arizona Revised Statutes, to the extent such items are to be prepared or

4 served to individuals for consumption on the premises of a public educational entity

5 during school hours.

6 (F) THE TAX IMPOSED BY THIS SECTION SHALL NOT APPLY TO SALES OF LOW

7 OR REDUCED COST ARTICLES OF FOOD OR DRINK TO ELIGIBLE ELDERLY

8 OR HOMELESS PERSONS OR PERSONS WITH A DISABILITY BY A BUSINESS

9 SUBJECT TO TAX UNDER A.R.S. SECTION 42-5074 THAT CONTRACTS WITH

10 THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY AND THAT IS APPROVED BY

11 THE FOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES

12 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PURSUANT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL

13 NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ESTABLISHED BY THE FOOD AND

14 NUTRITION ACT OF 2008 (P.L. 110-246; 122 STAT. 1651; 7 UNITED STATES

15 CODE SECTIONS 2011 THROUGH 2036a), IF THE PURCHASES ARE MADE

16 WITH THE BENEFITS ISSUED PURSUANT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL

17 NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

18 (G) THE TAX IMPOSED BY THIS SECTION SHALL NOT APPLY TO SALES BY A

19 NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION THAT IS EXEMPT FROM TAXATION UNDER

20 SECTION 501(C)(3), 501(C)(4) OR 501(C)(6) OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE

21 IF THE ORGANIZATION IS ASSOCIATED WITH A MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL

22 TEAM OR A NATIONAL TOURING PROFESSIONAL GOLFING ASSOCIATION

23 AND NO PART OF THE ORGANIZATION'S NET EARNINGS INURES TO THE




Page 149
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 BENEFIT OF ANY PRIVATE SHAREHOLDER OR INDIVIDUAL. THIS

2 PARAGRAPH DOES NOT APPLY TO AN ORGANIZATION THAT IS OWNED,

3 MANAGED OR CONTROLLED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, BY A MAJOR LEAGUE

4 BASEBALL TEAM, OR ITS OWNERS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS, OR

5 BY A MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL ASSOCIATION OR PROFESSIONAL

6 GOLFING ASSOCIATION, OR ITS OWNERS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES OR

7 AGENTS, UNLESS THE ORGANIZATION CONDUCTED OR OPERATED

8 EXHIBITION EVENTS IN THIS STATE BEFORE JANUARY 1, 2018 THAT WERE

9 EXEMPT FROM TAXATION UNDER A.R.S. SECTION 42-5073.

10 (H) IF A CITY, TOWN OR OTHER TAXING JURISDICTION IMPOSES A

11 TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE, SALES, USE, FRANCHISE OR OTHER SIMILAR

12 TAX OR FEE, HOWEVER DENOMINATED, ON THE SALE OF FOOD ITEMS

13 INTENDED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION AS DEFINED BY RULE ADOPTED

14 PURSUANT TO A.R.S. SECTION 42-5106 OR ITEMS PRESCRIBED BY A.R.S.

15 SECTION 42-5106, SUBSECTION D FOR CONSUMPTION ON THE PREMISES,

16 THE TAX MUST BE APPLIED UNIFORMLY WITH RESPECT TO ALL FOOD

17 ITEMS, AND AN ADDITIONAL TAX OR FEE DIFFERENTIAL MAY NOT BE

18 ASSESSED OR APPLIED WITH RESPECT TO ANY SPECIFIC FOOD ITEM.

19 (I) For the purposes of this Section, "accessories" means paper plates, plastic eating utensils,

20 napkins, paper cups, drinking straws, paper sacks or other disposable containers, or other

21 items which facilitate the consumption of the food.





Page 150
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 Section IX. Phoenix City Code Section 14-462 is amended as follows, with an effective date

2 of January 1, 2015, except new subsection (f) which has an effective date of August 3, 2018.


4 Sec. 14-462. Retail sales: food for home consumption.


6 (a) The tax rate shall be at an amount equal to zero percent (0%) of the gross income from

7 the business activity upon every person engaging or continuing in the business of selling

8 food for home consumption at retail.

9 (b) For the purposes of this Section only, the following definitions shall be applicable:

10 (1) "Eligible grocery business" means an establishment THAT IS DEEMED

11 ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION

12 ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ESTABLISHED BY THE FOOD AND

13 NUTRITION ACT OF 2008 (P.L. 110-246; 122 STAT. 1651; 7 UNITED

14 STATES CODE SECTIONS 2011 THROUGH 2036A) BY THE UNITED

15 STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD AND NUTRITION

16 SERVICE OR AN ESTABLISHMENT THAT PROVES TO THE

17 SATISFACTION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE THAT, BASED ON

18 THE NATURE OF THE ESTABLISHMENT'S FOOD SALES, COULD BE

19 ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION

20 ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ESTABLISHED BY THE FOOD AND

21 NUTRITION ACT OF 2008 whose sales of food are such that it is eligible to

22 participate in the Food Stamp Program established by the Food Stamp Act of




Page 151
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 1977 (P.L. 95-113; 91 Stat. 958.7 U.S.C. Section 2011 et seq.), according to

2 regulations in effect on January 1, 1979. An establishment is deemed eligible to

3 participate in the Food Stamp Program if it is authorized to participate in the

4 program by the United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition

5 Service Field Office on the effective date of the ordinance codified in this section,

6 or if, prior to a reporting period for which the return is filed, such retailer proves

7 to the satisfaction of the tax collector that the establishment, based on the nature

8 of the retailer’s food sales, could be eligible to participate in the Food Stamp

9 Program established by the Food Stamp Act of 1977 according to regulations in

10 effect on January 1, 1979.

11 (2) "Facilities for the consumption of food" means tables, chairs, benches, booths,

12 stools, counters, and similar conveniences, trays, glasses, dishes, or other

13 tableware and parking areas for the convenience of in-car consumption of food in

14 or on the premises on which the retailer conducts business.

15 (3) "Food for consumption on the premises” means any of the following:

16 (A) "Hot prepared food" as defined below.

17 (B) Hot or cold sandwiches.

18 (C) Food served by an attendant to be eaten at tables, chairs, benches, booths,

19 stools, counters, and similar conveniences and within parking areas for the

20 convenience of in-car consumption of food.

21 (D) Food served with trays, glasses, dishes, or other tableware.




Page 152
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (E) Beverages sold in cups, glasses, or open containers.

2 (F) Food sold by caterers.

3 (G) Food sold within the premises of theatres, movies, operas, shows of any

4 type or nature, exhibitions, concerts, carnivals, circuses, amusement parks,

5 fairs, races, contests, games, athletic events, rodeos, billiard and pool

6 parlors, bowling alleys, public dances, dance halls, boxing, wrestling and

7 other matches, and any business which charges admission, entrance, or

8 cover fees for exhibition, amusement, entertainment, or instruction.

9 (H) Any items contained in subsections (a)(3)(A) through (G) above even

10 though they are sold on a "take-out" or "to go" basis, and whether or not

11 the item is packaged, wrapped, or is actually taken from the premises.

12 (4) "Hot prepared food" means those products, items, or ingredients of food which

13 are prepared and intended for consumption in a heated condition. "Hot prepared

14 food" includes a combination of hot and cold food items or ingredients if a single

15 price has been established.

16 (5) "Premises" means the total space and facilities in or on which a vendor conducts

17 business and which are owned or controlled, in whole or in part, by a vendor or

18 which are made available for the use of customers of the vendor or group of

19 vendors, including any building or part of a building, parking lot, or grounds.

20 (6) "Food for home consumption" means all food, except food for consumption on

21 the premises, if sold by any of the following:




Page 153
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (A) An eligible grocery business.

2 (B) A person who conducts a business whose primary business is not the sale

3 of food but who sells food which is displayed, packaged, and sold in a

4 similar manner as an eligible grocery business.

5 (C) A person who sells food and does not provide or make available any

6 facilities for the consumption of food on the premises.

7 (D) A person who conducts a delicatessen business either from a counter

8 which is separate from the place and cash register where taxable sales are

9 made or from a counter which has two cash registers and which are used

10 to record taxable and tax exempt sales, or a retailer who conducts a

11 delicatessen business who uses a cash register which has at least two tax

12 computing keys which are used to record taxable and tax exempt sales.

13 (E) Vending machines and other types of automatic retailers.

14 (F) A person’s sales of food, drink and condiment for consumption within the

15 premises of any prison, jail or other institution under the jurisdiction of the

16 state department of corrections, the department of public safety, the

17 department of juvenile corrections or a county sheriff.

18 (c) Income derived from the following sources is exempt from the tax imposed by this

19 Section:

20 (1) Sales of food for home consumption to a person regularly engaged in the business

21 of selling such property.




Page 154
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (2) Out-of-city sales or out-of-state sales.

2 (3) Charges for delivery or other “direct customer services” as prescribed by

3 regulation.

4 (4) Food purchased UNDER THE SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE

5 PROGRAM (SNAP) ESTABLISHED BY THE FOOD AND NUTRITION ACT

6 OF 2008 (P.L. 110-246; 122 STAT. 1651; 7 UNITED STATES CODE

7 SECTIONS 2011 THROUGH 2036A) BY THE UNITED STATES

8 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICE but

9 only to the extent that SNAP BENEFITS USING AN ELECTRONIC BENEFITS

10 TRANSFER (EBT) CARD OR OTHER METHOD OF CONVEYING SNAP

11 BENEFITS WAS actually used to purchase such food.

12 (5) Sales of food products by producers as provided for by A.R.S. Sections 3-561, 3-

13 562 and 3-563.

14 (6) Sales of food, beverages, condiments and accessories to a public educational

15 entity, pursuant to any of the provisions of Title 15, Arizona Revised Statutes,

16 including a regularly organized private or parochial school that offers an

17 educational program for grade twelve or under which may be attended in

18 substitution for a public school pursuant to A.R.S. Section 15-802 ; to the extent

19 such items are to be prepared or served to individuals for consumption on the

20 premises of a public educational entity during school hours. for the purposes of

21 this subsection, "accessories" means paper plates, plastic eating utensils, napkins,




Page 155
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 paper cups, drinking straws, paper sacks or other disposable containers, or other

2 items which facilitate the consumption of the food.

3 (7) Sales of food, beverages, condiments and accessories to a nonprofit charitable

4 organization that has qualified as an exempt organization under 26 U.S.C. Section

5 501(c)(3) and regularly serves meals to the needy and indigent on a continuing

6 basis at no cost. for the purposes of this subsection, "accessories" means paper

7 plates, plastic eating utensils, napkins, paper cups, drinking straws, paper sacks or

8 other disposable containers, or other items which facilitate the consumption of the

9 food.

10 (d) Reporting. such persons who sell food for home consumption shall, in conjunction with

11 the return required pursuant to Section 14-520, report to the tax collector in a manner

12 prescribed by the tax collector all sales of food for home consumption exempted from

13 taxes imposed by this Chapter.

14 (e) Recordkeeping.

15 (1) Retailers shall maintain accurate, verifiable, and complete records of all purchases

16 and sales of tangible personal property in order to verify exemptions from taxes

17 imposed by this chapter. A retailer may use any method of reporting that properly

18 reflects all purchases and sales of food for home consumption, as well as all

19 purchases and sales of items subject to taxes imposed by this Chapter, provided

20 that such records are maintained in accordance with Article III, and regulations of

21 the tax collector.




Page 156
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (2) Any person who fails to maintain records as provided herein shall be deemed to

2 have had no sales of food for home consumption, and if upon request by the tax

3 collector, a person cannot demonstrate to the tax collector that such records and

4 reports do properly reflect all sales of food for home consumption, the tax

5 collector may recompute the amount of tax to be paid as provided in Sections 14-

6 370 and 14-545(b).

7 (F) IF A CITY, TOWN OR OTHER TAXING JURISDICTION IMPOSES A

8 TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE, SALES, USE, FRANCHISE OR OTHER SIMILAR

9 TAX OR FEE, HOWEVER DENOMINATED, ON THE SALE OF FOOD ITEMS

10 INTENDED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION AS DEFINED BY RULE ADOPTED

11 PURSUANT TO A.R.S. SECTION 42-5106 OR ITEMS PRESCRIBED BY A.R.S.

12 SECTION 42-5106, SUBSECTION D FOR HOME CONSUMPTION, THE TAX

13 MUST BE APPLIED UNIFORMLY WITH RESPECT TO ALL FOOD, AND AN

14 ADDITIONAL TAX OR FEE DIFFERENTIAL MAY NOT BE ASSESSED OR

15 APPLIED WITH RESPECT TO ANY SPECIFIC FOOD ITEM.


17 Section X. Phoenix City Code Section 14-465 is amended as follows, with the following

18 effective dates per subsection: (k) January 1, 2015; (v) August 6, 2016; (y) January 1, 2018;

19 (ss) July 24, 2014; (tt) September 1, 2016; (uu) September 12, 2013; (vv) August 3, 2018;

20 (ww) August 3, 2018.


22 Sec. 14-465. Retail sales: exemptions.




Page 157
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code

2 Income derived from the following sources is exempt from the tax imposed by Section 14-460:

3 (a) sales of tangible personal property to a person regularly engaged in the business of selling

4 such property.

5 (b) out-of-City sales or out-of-State sales.

6 (c) charges for delivery, installation, or other direct customer services as prescribed by

7 Regulation.

8 (d) charges for repair services as prescribed by Regulation, when separately charged and

9 separately maintained in the books and records of the taxpayer.

10 (e) sales of warranty, maintenance, and service contracts, when separately charged and

11 separately maintained in the books and records of the taxpayer.

12 (f) sales of prosthetics.

13 (g) sales of income-producing capital equipment.

14 (h) sales of rental equipment and rental supplies.

15 (i) sales of mining and metallurgical supplies.

16 (j) sales of motor vehicle fuel and use fuel which are subject to a tax imposed under the

17 provisions of Article I or II, Chapter 16, Title 28, Arizona Revised Statutes; or sales of

18 use fuel to a holder of a valid single trip use fuel tax permit issued under A.R.S. Section

19 28-5739, or sales of natural gas or liquefied petroleum gas used to propel a motor vehicle.

20 (k) sales of tangible personal property to:




Page 158
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (1) a construction contractor who holds a valid Privilege Tax License for engaging or

2 continuing in the business of construction contracting where the tangible personal

3 property sold is incorporated into any structure or improvement to real property as

4 part of construction contracting activity.

5 (2) A PERSON THAT IS NOT SUBJECT TO TAX UNDER SECTION 415(B)(12)

6 AND THAT HAS BEEN PROVIDED A COPY OF A CERTIFICATE UNDER

7 A.R.S. SECTION 42-5009, SUBSECTION L, IF THE PROPERTY SO SOLD IS

8 INCORPORATED OR FABRICATED BY THE PERSON INTO THE REAL

9 PROPERTY, STRUCTURE, PROJECT, DEVELOPMENT OR

10 IMPROVEMENT DESCRIBED IN THE CERTIFICATE.

11 (l) sales of motor vehicles to nonresidents of this State for use outside this State if the vendor

12 ships or delivers the motor vehicle to a destination outside this State.

13 (m) sales of tangible personal property which directly enters into and becomes an ingredient

14 or component part of a product sold in the regular course of the business of job printing,

15 manufacturing, or publication of newspapers, magazines, or other periodicals. Tangible

16 personal property which is consumed or used up in a manufacturing, job printing,

17 publishing, or production process is not an ingredient nor component part of a product.

18 (n) sales made directly to the Federal government to the extent of:

19 (1) one hundred percent (100%) of the gross income derived from retail sales made

20 by a manufacturer, modifier, assembler, or repairer.

21 (2) fifty percent (50%) of the gross income derived from retail sales made by any

22 other person.




Page 159
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (o) sales to hotels, bars, restaurants, dining cars, lunchrooms, boarding houses, or similar

2 establishments of articles consumed as food, drink, or condiment, whether simple, mixed,

3 or compounded, where such articles are customarily prepared or served to patrons for

4 consumption on or off the premises, where the purchaser is properly licensed and paying

5 a tax under Section 14-455 or the equivalent excise tax upon such income.

6 (p) sales of tangible personal property to a qualifying hospital, qualifying community health

7 center or a qualifying health care organization, except when the property sold is for use in

8 activities resulting in gross income from unrelated business income as that term is

9 defined in 26 U.S.C. Section 512 or sales of tangible personal property purchased in this

10 State by a nonprofit charitable organization that has qualified under Section 501(c)(3) of

11 the United States Internal Revenue Code and that engages in and uses such property

12 exclusively for training, job placement or rehabilitation programs or testing for mentally

13 or physically handicapped persons.

14 (q) (Reserved) (see Mesa city page).

15 (r) sales of the following to persons engaging or continuing in the business of farming,

16 ranching, or feeding livestock, poultry or ratites:

17 (1) seed, fertilizer, fungicides, seed treating chemicals, and other similar chemicals.

18 (2) feed for livestock, poultry or ratites, including salt, vitamins, and other additives

19 to such feed.

20 (3) livestock, poultry or ratites purchased or raised for slaughter, but not including

21 livestock purchased or raised for production or use, such as milch cows, breeding

22 bulls, laying hens, riding or work horses.




Page 160
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (4) (Reserved)

2 This exemption shall not be construed to include machinery, equipment, fuels, lubricants,

3 pharmaceuticals, repair and replacement parts, or other items used or consumed in the

4 running, maintenance, or repair of machinery, equipment, buildings, or structures used or

5 consumed in the business of farming, ranching, or feeding of livestock, poultry or ratites.

6 (s) sales of groundwater measuring devices required by A.R.S. Section 45-604.

7 (t) (Reserved)

8 (u) sales of aircraft acquired for use outside the State, as prescribed by Regulation.

9 (v) sales of food products by producers as provided for by A.R.S. Sections 3-561, 3-562 and

10 3-563. THIS INCLUDES SALES MADE DIRECTLY BY OWNERS, PROPRIETORS

11 OR TENANTS OF AGRICULTURAL LANDS OR FARMS WHO SELL LIVESTOCK

12 OR POULTRY FEED THAT IS GROWN OR RAISED ON THEIR LANDS TO ANY

13 OF THE FOLLOWING:

14 (1) PERSONS WHO FEED THEIR OWN LIVESTOCK OR POULTRY.

15 (2) PERSONS WHO ARE ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS OF PRODUCING

16 LIVESTOCK OR POULTRY COMMERCIALLY.

17 (3) PERSONS WHO ARE ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS OF FEEDING

18 LIVESTOCK OR POULTRY COMMERCIALLY OR WHO BOARD

19 LIVESTOCK NONCOMMERCIALLY.

20 (w) (Reserved)




Page 161
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (x) sales of food and drink to a person who is engaged in business that is classified under the

2 restaurant classification and that provides such food and drink without monetary charge

3 to its employees for their own consumption on the premises during such employees'

4 hours of employment.

5 (y) SALES OF TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY BY A NONPROFIT

6 ORGANIZATION THAT IS EXEMPT FROM TAXATION UNDER SECTION

7 501(C)(3), 501(C)(4) OR 42 501(C)(6) OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE IF THE

8 ORGANIZATION IS ASSOCIATED WITH A MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL TEAM

9 OR A NATIONAL TOURING PROFESSIONAL GOLFING ASSOCIATION AND NO

10 PART OF THE ORGANIZATION'S NET EARNINGS INURES TO THE BENEFIT OF

11 ANY PRIVATE SHAREHOLDER OR INDIVIDUAL. THIS PARAGRAPH DOES

12 NOT APPLY TO AN ORGANIZATION THAT IS OWNED, MANAGED OR

13 CONTROLLED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, BY A MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL

14 TEAM, OR ITS OWNERS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS, OR BY A

15 MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL ASSOCIATION OR PROFESSIONAL GOLFING

16 ASSOCIATION, OR ITS OWNERS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS,

17 UNLESS THE ORGANIZATION CONDUCTED OR OPERATED EXHIBITION

18 EVENTS IN THIS STATE BEFORE JANUARY 1, 2018 THAT WERE EXEMPT

19 FROM TAXATION UNDER A.R.S. SECTION 42-5073.

20 (z) (Reserved)

21 (aa) the sale of tangible personal property used in remediation contracting as defined in

22 Section 14-100 and Regulation 14-100.5.




Page 162
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (bb) sales of materials that are purchased by or for publicly funded libraries including school

2 district libraries, charter school libraries, community college libraries, state university

3 libraries or federal, state, county or municipal libraries for use by the public as follows:

4 (1) printed or photographic materials.

5 (2) electronic or digital media materials.

6 (cc) sales of food, beverages, condiments and accessories used for serving food and beverages

7 to a commercial airline, as defined in A.R.S. Section 42-5061, that serves the food and

8 beverages to its passengers, without additional charge, for consumption in flight. For the

9 purposes of this subsection, "accessories" means paper plates, plastic eating utensils,

10 napkins, paper cups, drinking straws, paper sacks or other disposable containers, or other

11 items which facilitate the consumption of the food.

12 (dd) in computing the tax base in the case of the sale or transfer of wireless

13 telecommunication equipment as an inducement to a customer to enter into or continue a

14 contract for telecommunication services that are taxable under Section 14-470, gross

15 proceeds of sales or gross income does not include any sales commissions or other

16 compensation received by the retailer as a result of the customer entering into or

17 continuing a contract for the telecommunications services.

18 (ee) for the purposes of this Section, a sale of wireless telecommunication equipment to a

19 person who holds the equipment for sale or transfer to a customer as an inducement to

20 enter into or continue a contract for telecommunication services that are taxable under

21 Section 14-470 is considered to be a sale for resale in the regular course of business.




Page 163
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (ff) sales of alternative fuel as defined in A.R.S. Section 1-215, to a used oil fuel burner who

2 has received a Department of Environmental Quality permit to burn used oil or used oil

3 fuel under A.R.S. SECTION § 49-426 or A.R.S. SECTION § 49-480.

4 (gg) sales of food, beverages, condiments and accessories to a public educational entity

5 pursuant to any of the provisions of Title 15, Arizona Revised Statutes, including a

6 regularly organized private or parochial school that offers an educational program for

7 grade twelve (12) or under which may be attended in substitution for a public school

8 pursuant to A.R.S. SECTION Section 15-802; to the extent such items are to be prepared

9 or served to individuals for consumption on the premises of a public educational entity

10 during school hours. For the purposes of this subsection, "accessories" means paper

11 plates, plastic eating utensils, napkins, paper cups, drinking straws, paper sacks or other

12 disposable containers, or other items which facilitate the consumption of the food.

13 (hh) sales of personal hygiene items to a person engaged in the business of and subject to tax

14 under Section 14-444 of this code if the tangible personal property is furnished without

15 additional charge to and intended to be consumed by the person during his occupancy.

16 (ii) for the purposes of this Section, the diversion of gas from a pipeline by a person engaged

17 in the business of operating a natural or artificial gas pipeline, for the sole purpose of

18 fueling compressor equipment to pressurize the pipeline, is not a sale of the gas to the

19 operator of the pipeline.

20 (jj) sales of food, beverages, condiments and accessories to a nonprofit charitable

21 organization that has qualified as an exempt organization under 26 U.S.C Section

22 501(c)(3) and regularly serves meals to the needy and indigent on a continuing basis at no




Page 164
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 cost. For the purposes of this subsection, "accessories" means paper plates, plastic eating

2 utensils, napkins, paper cups, drinking straws, paper sacks or other disposable containers,

3 or other items which facilitate the consumption of the food.

4 (kk) sales of motor vehicles that use alternative fuel if such vehicle was manufactured as a

5 diesel fuel vehicle and converted to operate on alternative fuel and sales of equipment

6 that is installed in a conventional diesel fuel motor vehicle to convert the vehicle to

7 operate on an alternative fuel, as defined in A.R.S. Section 1-215.

8 (ll) sales of solar energy devices, for taxable periods beginning from and after July 1, 2008.

9 The retailer shall register with the department of revenue as a solar energy retailer. By

10 registering, the retailer acknowledges that it will make its books and records relating to

11 sales of solar energy devices available to the department of revenue and city, as

12 applicable, for examination.

13 (mm) sales or other transfers of renewable energy credits or any other unit created to track

14 energy derived from renewable energy resources. For the purposes of this paragraph,

15 "renewable energy credit" means a unit created administratively by the corporation

16 commission or governing body of a public power utility to track kilowatt hours of

17 electricity derived from a renewable energy resource or the kilowatt hour equivalent of

18 conventional energy resources displaced by distributed renewable energy resources.

19 (nn) sales of magazines or other periodicals or other publications by this state to encourage

20 tourist travel.

21 (oo) sales of paper machine clothing, such as forming fabrics and dryer felts, sold to a paper

22 manufacturer and directly used or consumed in paper manufacturing.




Page 165
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (pp) sales of overhead materials or other tangible personal property that is used in performing

2 a contract between the United States government and a manufacturer, modifier,

3 assembler or repairer, including property used in performing a subcontract with a

4 government contractor who is a manufacturer, modifier, assembler or repairer, to which

5 title passes to the government under the terms of the contract or subcontract.

6 (qq) sales of coal, petroleum, coke, natural gas, virgin fuel oil and electricity sold to a

7 qualified environmental technology manufacturer, producer or processor as defined in

8 A.R.S. Section 41-1514.02 and directly used or consumed in the generation or provision

9 of on-site power or energy solely for environmental technology manufacturing,

10 producing or processing or environmental protection. This paragraph shall apply for

11 twenty full consecutive calendar or fiscal years from the date the first paper

12 manufacturing machine is placed in service. In the case of an environmental technology

13 manufacturer, producer or processor who does not manufacture paper, the time period

14 shall begin with the date the first manufacturing, processing or production equipment is

15 placed in service.

16 (rr) sales or gross income derived from sales of machinery, equipment, materials and other

17 tangible personal property used directly and predominantly to construct a qualified

18 environmental technology manufacturing, producing or processing facility as described in

19 A.R.S. Section 41-1514.02. This subsection applies for ten full consecutive calendar or

20 fiscal years after the start of initial construction.

21 (SS) THE TRANSFER OF TITLE OR POSSESSION OF COAL BACK AND FORTH

22 BETWEEN AN OWNER OR OPERATOR OF A POWER PLANT AND A PERSON




Page 166
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REFINING COAL IF BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING

2 APPLY:

3 (1) THE TRANSFER OF TITLE OR POSSESSION OF THE COAL IS FOR THE

4 PURPOSE OF REFINING THE COAL; AND

5 (2) THE TITLE OR POSSESSION OF THE COAL IS TRANSFERRED BACK TO

6 THE OWNER OR OPERATOR OF THE POWER PLANT AFTER

7 COMPLETION OF THE COAL REFINING PROCESS. FOR THE PURPOSES

8 OF THIS SUBDIVISION, "COAL REFINING PROCESS" MEANS THE

9 APPLICATION OF A COAL ADDITIVE SYSTEM THAT AIDS THE

10 REDUCTION OF POWER PLANT EMISSIONS DURING THE

11 COMBUSTION OF COAL AND THE TREATMENT OF FLUE GAS.

12 (TT) (RESERVED)

13 (UU) COMPUTER DATA CENTER EQUIPMENT SOLD TO THE OWNER, OPERATOR

14 OR QUALIFIED COLOCATION TENANT OF A COMPUTER DATA CENTER

15 THAT IS CERTIFIED BY THE ARIZONA COMMERCE AUTHORITY UNDER

16 A.R.S. SECTION 41-1519 OR AN AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER,

17 OPERATOR OR QUALIFIED COLOCATION TENANT DURING THE

18 QUALIFICATION PERIOD FOR USE IN THE QUALIFIED COMPUTER DATA

19 CENTER. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PARAGRAPH, "COMPUTER DATA

20 CENTER", "COMPUTER DATA CENTER EQUIPMENT", "QUALIFICATION

21 PERIOD" AND "QUALIFIED COLOCATION TENANT" HAVE THE SAME

22 MEANINGS PRESCRIBED IN A.R.S. SECTION 41-1519.




Page 167
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (VV) THE SALE, MANUFACTURE, WHOLESALE OR DISTRIBUTION TO OR AMONG

2 ANY WHOLESALERS, DISTRIBUTORS OR RETAILERS, OF FOOD ITEMS

3 INTENDED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION AS DEFINED BY RULE ADOPTED

4 PURSUANT TO A.R.S. SECTION 42-5106 OR ITEMS PRESCRIBED BY A.R.S.

5 SECTION 42-5106, SUBSECTION D FOR HOME CONSUMPTION OR FOR

6 CONSUMPTION ON THE PREMISES.

7 (WW) THE SALE OF ANY CONTAINER OR PACKAGING USED EXCLUSIVELY FOR

8 TRANSPORTING, PROTECTING OR CONSUMING FOOD ITEMS INTENDED

9 FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION AS DEFINED BY RULE ADOPTED PURSUANT

10 TO A.R.S. SECTION 42-5106 OR ITEMS PRESCRIBED BY A.R.S. SECTION 42-

11 5106, SUBSECTION D FOR HOME CONSUMPTION OR FOR CONSUMPTION ON

12 THE PREMISES.


14 Section XI. Phoenix City Code Section 14-470 is amended as follows, with the following

15 effective dates per subsection: (h) July 24, 2014; (a)(3)(A), (a)(3)(B), (a)(4), & (i) July

16 1, 2019. Phoenix City Tax Code Regulation 14-470.1 is repealed effective July 1,

17 2019.


19 Sec. 14-470. Telecommunication services.

20 (a) The tax rate shall be at an amount equal to four and seven-tenths percent (4.7%) of the

21 gross income from the business activity upon every person engaging or continuing in the

22 business of providing telecommunication services to consumers within this City.




Page 168
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (1) Telecommunication services shall include:

2 (A) two-way voice, sound, and/or video communication over a

3 communications channel.

4 (B) one-way voice, sound, and/or video transmission or relay over a

5 communications channel.

6 (C) facsimile transmissions.

7 (D) providing relay or repeater service.

8 (E) providing computer interface services over a communications channel.

9 (F) time-sharing activities with a computer accomplished through the use of a

10 communications channel.

11 (2) Gross income from the business activity of providing telecommunication services

12 to consumers within this City shall include:

13 (A) all fees for connection to a telecommunication system.

14 (B) toll charges, charges for transmissions, and charges for other

15 telecommunications services; provided that such charges relate to

16 transmissions originating in the City and terminating in this State.

17 (C) fees charged for access to or subscription to or membership in a

18 telecommunication system or network.




Page 169
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (D) Charges for monitoring services relating to a security or burglar alarm system

2 located within the City where such system transmits or receives signals or

3 data over a communications channel.

4 (D) charges for telephone, fax or internet access services provided at an

5 additional charge by a hotel business subject to taxation under Section 14-

6 444.

7 (3) Gross income from the business activity of providing telecommunication services

8 to consumers within this City shall not include:

9 (A) charges for installation, maintenance, and repair of telecommunication

10 equipment which are subject to the provisions of Sections 14-415, 14-416,

11 or 14-417 (construction contracting); 14-445 (real property rental); 14-450

12 (tangible personal property rental); or 14-460 (retail sales); depending

13 upon the nature of the work performed.

14 (B) separately billed advertising charges which are subject to the provisions of

15 Section 14-405 (advertising) or 14-435 (publishing).

16 (4) Mobile equipment. In cases where the customer is being provided

17 telecommunication services to receiving/transmission equipment designed to be

18 mobile in nature (for example, mobile telephones, portable hand-held two-way

19 radios, paging devices, etc.), the provider shall, for the purposes of the tax

20 imposed by this Section, determine whether such provider's customers are "within

21 this City" by the billing address of the customer, provided that such address is a

22 permanent residence or business location of the consumer within the State.




Page 170
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (b) Resale telecommunication services. Gross income from sales of telecommunication

2 services to another provider of telecommunication services for the purpose of providing

3 the purchaser's customers with such service shall be exempt from the tax imposed by this

4 Section; provided, however, that such purchaser is properly licensed by the City to

5 engage in such business.

6 (c) Interstate transmissions. Charges by a provider of telecommunication services for

7 transmissions originating in the City and terminating outside the State are exempt from

8 the tax imposed by this Section.

9 (d) Tax credit offset for franchise fees. There shall be allowed as an offset, up to the amount

10 of tax due, any amounts paid to the City for license fees or franchise fees, but such offset

11 shall not be allowed against taxes imposed by any other Section of this Chapter. Such

12 offset shall not be deemed in conflict with or violation of subsection 14-400(b).

13 (e) (Reserved)

14 (f) Prepaid calling cards. Telecommunications services purchased with a prepaid calling card

15 that are taxable under Section 14-460 are exempt from the tax imposed under this

16 Section.

17 (g) Internet access services. The gross income subject to tax under this Section shall not

18 include sales of internet access services to the person's subscribers and customers. For the

19 purposes of this subsection:

20 (1) "Internet" means the computer and telecommunications facilities that comprise

21 the interconnected worldwide network of networks that employ the transmission




Page 171
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 control protocol or internet protocol, or any predecessor or successor protocol, to

2 communicate information of all kinds by wire or radio.

3 (2) "Internet Access" means a service that enables users to access content,

4 information, electronic mail or other services over the internet. Internet access

5 does not include telecommunication services provided by a common carrier.

6 (H) ALARM MONITORING SERVICES. THE GROSS INCOME SUBJECT TO TAX

7 UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL NOT INCLUDE SALES OF MONITORING

8 SERVICES RELATING TO AN ALARM SYSTEM AS DEFINED IN A.R.S.

9 SECTION 32-101.

10 (I) OVER-THE-TOP-SERVICES. THE GROSS INCOME SUBJECT TO TAX UNDER

11 THIS SECTION SHALL NOT INCLUDE SALES OF OVER-THE-TOP SERVICES.

12 FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PARAGRAPH “OVER-THE-TOP SERVICES"

13 MEANS AUDIO OR VIDEO PROGRAMMING SERVICES THAT ARE RECEIVED

14 BY THE PURCHASER BY MEANS OF AN INTERNET CONNECTION,

15 REGARDLESS OF THE TECHNOLOGY USED, THAT INCLUDE LINEAR OR LIVE

16 PROGRAMMING AND THAT ARE GENERALLY CONSIDERED COMPARABLE

17 TO PROGRAMMING PROVIDED BY RADIO OR TELEVISION BROADCAST

18 STATION AND INCLUDES RELATED ON DEMAND PROGRAMMING

19 PROVIDED AT NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE

20 SERVICES ARE PROVIDED INDEPENDENTLY OR PACKAGED WITH OTHER

21 AUDIO OR VIDEO PROGRAMMING.

22 Phoenix City Code Regulation 14-470.1. Telecommunications services.




Page 172
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code

2 a. Gross income from the business activity of providing telecommunication services to

3 consumers within this City shall not include:

4 1. Charges for installation, maintenance, and repair of telecommunication equipment

5 which are subject to the provisions of Section 14-415, 14-416, or 14-417

6 (construction contracting); 14-445 (real property rental); 14-450 (tangible

7 personal property rental); or 14-460 (retail sales); depending upon the nature of

8 the work performed.

9 2. Separately billed advertising charges which are subject to the provisions of Section

10 14-405 or 14-435.

11 b. Mobile equipment. In cases where the customer is being provided telecommunication

12 services to receiving/transmission equipment designed to be mobile in nature (for

13 example, mobile telephones, portable handheld two-way radios, paging devices, etc.), the

14 provider shall, for the purposes of the tax imposed by this section, determine whether

15 such provider’s customers are "within this City" as follows:

16 1. By the billing address of the customer, provided that such address is a permanent

17 residence or business location of the consumer within the State.

18 2. In all other cases, the business location of the telecommunications provider.


20 Section XII. Phoenix City Code Section 14-475 is amended as follows, with an effective

21 date of September 1, 2016.




Page 173
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code

2 Sec. 14-475. Transporting for hire.

3 The tax rate shall be at an amount equal to two and three-tenths percent (2.3%) of the gross

4 income from the business activity upon every person engaging or continuing in the business of

5 providing the following forms of transportation for hire from this City to another point within the

6 State:

7 (a) transporting of persons or property by railroad; provided, however, that the tax imposed

8 by this subsection shall not apply to transporting freight or property for hire by a railroad

9 operating exclusively in this State if the transportation comprises a portion of a single

10 shipment of freight or property, involving more than one railroad, either from a point in

11 this State to a point outside this State or from a point outside this State to a point in this

12 State. For purposes of this paragraph, "a single shipment" means the transportation that

13 begins at the point at which one of the railroads first takes possession of the freight or

14 property and continues until the point at which one of the railroads relinquishes

15 possession of the freight or property to a party other than one of the railroads.

16 (b) transporting of oil or natural or artificial gas through pipe or conduit.

17 (c) transporting of property by aircraft.

18 (d) (Reserved)

19 (1) (Reserved)

20 (2) (Reserved)

21 (3) (Reserved)




Page 174
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (4) (Reserved)

2 (e) (Reserved)

3 (f) Deductions or exemptions. The gross proceeds of sales or gross income derived from the

4 following sources is exempt from the tax imposed by this Section:

5 (1) income that is specifically included as the gross income of a business activity

6 upon which another Section of Article IV imposes a tax, that is separately stated

7 to the customer and is taxable to the person engaged in that classification not to

8 exceed consideration paid to the person conducting the activity.

9 (2) income from arranging amusement or transportation when the amusement or

10 transportation is conducted by another person not to exceed consideration paid to

11 the amusement or transportation business.

12 (3) ANY AMOUNT ATTRIBUTABLE TO FEES COLLECTED BY

13 TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES ISSUED A PERMIT

14 PURSUANT TO A.R.S. SECTION 28-9552.

15 (4) TRANSPORTING FOR HIRE PERSONS BY TRANSPORTATION

16 NETWORK COMPANY DRIVERS ON TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING

17 TRANSPORTATION NETWORK SERVICES AS DEFINED IN A.R.S.

18 SECTION 28-9551.

19 (5) TRANSPORTING FOR HIRE PERSONS BY VEHICLE FOR HIRE

20 COMPANIES ISSUED A PERMIT PURSUANT TO A.R.S. SECTION 28-9503.




Page 175
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (6) TRANSPORTING FOR HIRE PERSONS BY VEHICLE FOR HIRE DRIVERS

2 ON TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING VEHICLE FOR HIRE SERVICES AS

3 DEFINED IN A.R.S. SECTION 28-9501.

4 (g) The tax imposed by this Section shall not include arranging transportation as a

5 convenience to a person's customers if that person is not otherwise engaged in the

6 business of transporting persons, freight or property for hire. This exception does not

7 apply to businesses that dispatch vehicles pursuant to customer orders and send the

8 billings and receive the payments associated with that activity, including when the

9 transportation is performed by third party independent contractors. For the purposes of

10 this paragraph, "arranging" includes billing for or collecting transportation charges from a

11 person's customers on behalf of the persons providing the transportation.


13 Section XIII. Phoenix City Code Section 14-480 is amended as follows, with an effective

14 date of August 1, 2015.


16 Sec. 14-480. Utility services.

17 (a) The tax rate shall be at an amount equal to two and seven-tenths percent (2.7%) of the

18 gross income from the business activity upon every person engaging or continuing in the

19 business of producing, providing, or furnishing utility services, including electricity,

20 electric lights, current, power, gas (natural or artificial), or water to:

21 (1) consumers or ratepayers who reside within the City.




Page 176
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (2) (Reserved)

2 (b) Exclusion of certain sales of natural gas to a public utility. Notwithstanding the

3 provisions of subsection (a) above, the gross income derived from the sale of natural gas

4 to a public utility for the purpose of generation of power to be transferred by the utility to

5 its ratepayers shall be considered a retail sale of tangible personal property subject to

6 Sections 14-460 and 14-465, and not considered gross income taxable under this Section.

7 (c) Resale utility services. Sales of utility services to another provider of the same utility

8 services for the purpose of providing such utility services either to another properly

9 licensed utility provider or directly to such purchaser's customers or ratepayers shall be

10 exempt and deductible from the cross income subject to the tax imposed by this Section,

11 provided that the purchaser is properly licensed by all applicable taxing jurisdictions to

12 engage or continue in the business of providing utility services, and further provided that

13 the seller maintains proper documentation, in a manner similar to that for sales for resale,

14 of such transactions.

15 (d) (Reserved)

16 (e) The tax imposed by this Section shall not apply to sales of utility services to a qualifying

17 hospital, qualifying community health center or a qualifying health care organization,

18 except when sold for use in activities resulting in gross income from unrelated business

19 income as that term is defined in 26 U.S.C. Section 512.

20 (f) The tax imposed by this Section shall not apply to sales of natural gas or liquefied

21 petroleum gas used to propel a motor vehicle.

22 (g) The tax imposed by this Section shall not apply to:




Page 177
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (1) revenues received by a municipally owned utility in the form of fees charged to

2 persons constructing residential, commercial or industrial developments or

3 connecting residential, commercial or industrial developments to a municipal

4 utility system or systems if the fees are segregated and used only for capital

5 expansion, system enlargement or debt service of the utility system or systems.

6 (2) revenues received by any person or persons owning a utility system in the form of

7 reimbursement or contribution compensation for property and equipment installed

8 to provide utility access to, on or across the land of an actual utility consumer if

9 the property and equipment become the property of the utility. This exclusion

10 shall not exceed the value of such property and equipment.

11 (h) The tax imposed by this Section shall not apply to sales of alternative fuel as defined in

12 A.R.S. SECTION § 1-215, to a used oil fuel burner who has received a Department of

13 Environmental Quality permit to burn used oil or used oil fuel under A.R.S. SECTION §

14 49-426 or A.R.S. SECTION § 49-480.

15 (i) The tax imposed by this Section shall not apply to sales or other transfers of renewable

16 energy credits or any other unit created to track energy derived from renewable energy

17 resources. For the purposes of this paragraph, "renewable energy credit" means a unit

18 created administratively by the corporation commission or governing body of a public

19 power utility to track kilowatt hours of electricity derived from a renewable energy

20 resource or the kilowatt hour equivalent of conventional energy resources displaced by

21 distributed renewable energy resources.




Page 178
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (j) The tax imposed by this Section shall not apply to the portion of gross proceeds of sales

2 or gross income attributable to transfers of electricity by any retail electric customer

3 owning a solar photovoltaic energy generating system to an electric distribution system,

4 if the electricity transferred is generated by the customer's system.

5 (k) (Reserved)


7 Section XIV. Phoenix City Code Section 14-530 is amended as follows, with an effective

8 date of January 1, 2015.


10 Sec. 14-530. When tax due; when delinquent; verification of return; extensions.

11 (a) Except as provided elsewhere in this Section, the taxes shall be due and payable monthly

12 on or before the twentieth (20th) day of the month next succeeding the month in which

13 the tax accrues.

14 (B) ANY PERSON WHO IS ENGAGED IN OR CONDUCTING BUSINESS IN TWO OR

15 MORE LOCATIONS OR UNDER TWO OR MORE BUSINESS NAMES SHALL

16 FILE THE RETURN REQUIRED UNDER THIS CHAPTER BY ELECTRONIC

17 MEANS.

18 (C) THE DEPARTMENT, FOR ANY TAXPAYER WHOSE ESTIMATED ANNUAL

19 LIABILITY FOR TAXES IMPOSED OR ADMINISTERED BY A.R.S TITLE 42,

20 CHAPTER 5, ARTICLE 1 OR A.R.S. TITLE 42, CHAPTER 6 IS BETWEEN TWO

21 THOUSAND DOLLARS AND EIGHT THOUSAND DOLLARS, SHALL




Page 179
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 AUTHORIZE SUCH TAXPAYER TO PAY SUCH TAXES ON A QUARTERLY

2 BASIS. THE DEPARTMENT, FOR ANY TAXPAYER WHOSE ESTIMATED

3 ANNUAL LIABILITY FOR TAXES IMPOSED OR ADMINISTERED BY A.R.S

4 TITLE 42, CHAPTER 5, ARTICLE 1 OR A.R.S. TITLE 42, CHAPTER 6 IS LESS

5 THAN TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS SHALL AUTHORIZE SUCH TAXPAYER TO

6 PAY SUCH TAXES ON AN ANNUAL BASIS.

7 (D) Delinquency Date. THE TAXES LEVIED UNDER THIS CHAPTER WILL BE

8 CONSIDERED DELINQUENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.R.S. SECTION 42-5014,

9 AS FOLLOWS:

10 (1) FOR TAXPAYERS THAT ARE REQUIRED OR ELECT TO FILE AND PAY

11 ELECTRONICALLY IN ANY MONTH, IF NOT RECEIVED BY THE

12 DEPARTMENT ON OR BEFORE THE LAST BUSINESS DAY OF THE

13 MONTH.

14 (2) FOR ALL OTHER TAXPAYERS, IF NOT RECEIVED BY THE

15 DEPARTMENT ON OR BEFORE THE BUSINESS DAY PRECEDING THE

16 LAST BUSINESS DAY OF THE MONTH

17 (E) Jeopardy reporting. If the Tax Collector determines that the collection of any tax due to

18 the City is in jeopardy, the Tax Collector may direct the taxpayer to file his return and

19 remit the tax on a weekly, daily, or transaction-by-transaction basis. Such return and

20 remittance shall be due upon the date fixed by the Tax Collector, and the "delinquency

21 date" shall be the following day.




Page 180
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (F) Extensions. The Tax Collector may extend the time for filing a return, for good cause

2 shown, and only when requested in writing and received by the Tax Collector prior to the

3 tax due date. However, the time for filing such return shall not be extended beyond the

4 last business day of the month next succeeding the due date of such return. In such cases,

5 only the penalties for late filing and late payment may be waived by the Tax Collector for

6 filing and payment within the extension period. Notwithstanding the granting of an

7 extension, the interest payable for late payment of taxes shall be paid for the period

8 commencing upon the original delinquency date and ending on the date the tax is paid.

9 The interest may not be waived by the Tax Collector.


11 Section XV. Phoenix City Code Section 14-660 is amended as follows, with the following

12 effective dates per subsection: (k) January 1, 2015; (ee) January 1, 2018; (ss) August 1,

13 2015; (tt) July 24, 2014; (uu) September 12, 2013; (vv) December 1, 2017; (ww) August 3,

14 2018; (yy) August 3, 2018.


16 Sec. 14-660. Use tax: exemptions.

17 The storage or use in this City of the following tangible personal property is exempt from the

18 Use Tax imposed by this Article:

19 (a) tangible personal property brought into the City by an individual who was not a resident

20 of the City at the time the property was acquired for his own use, if the first actual use of

21 such property was outside the City, unless such property is used in conducting a business

22 in this City.




Page 181
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (b) tangible personal property, the value of which does not exceed the amount of one

2 thousand dollars ($1,000) per item, acquired by an individual outside the limits of the

3 City for his personal use and enjoyment.

4 (c) charges for delivery, installation, or other customer services, as prescribed by Regulation.

5 (d) charges for repair services, as prescribed by Regulation.

6 (e) separately itemized charges for warranty, maintenance, and service contracts.

7 (f) prosthetics.

8 (g) income-producing capital equipment.

9 (h) rental equipment and rental supplies.

10 (i) mining and metallurgical supplies.

11 (j) motor vehicle fuel and use fuel which are used upon the highways of this State and upon

12 which a tax has been imposed under the provisions of Article I or II, Chapter 16, Title 28,

13 Arizona Revised Statutes.

14 (k) tangible personal property purchased by:

15 (1) a construction contractor, but not an owner-builder, when such person holds a

16 valid Privilege License for engaging or continuing in the business of construction

17 contracting, and where the property acquired is incorporated into any structure or

18 improvement to real property in fulfillment of a construction contract.

19 (2) A PERSON THAT IS NOT SUBJECT TO TAX UNDER SECTION 415(B)(12)

20 AND THAT HAS BEEN PROVIDED A COPY OF A CERTIFICATE UNDER




Page 182
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 A.R.S. SECTION 42-5009, SUBSECTION L, IF THE PROPERTY SO SOLD IS

2 INCORPORATED OR FABRICATED BY THE PERSON INTO THE REAL

3 PROPERTY, STRUCTURE, PROJECT, DEVELOPMENT OR

4 IMPROVEMENT DESCRIBED IN THE CERTIFICATE.

5 (l) sales of motor vehicles to nonresidents of this State for use outside this State if the vendor

6 ships or delivers the motor vehicle to a destination outside this State.

7 (m) tangible personal property which directly enters into and becomes an ingredient or

8 component part of a product sold in the regular course of the business of job printing,

9 manufacturing, or publication of newspapers, magazines or other periodicals. Tangible

10 personal property which is consumed or used up in a manufacturing, job printing,

11 publishing, or production process is not an ingredient nor component part of a product.

12 (n) rental, leasing, or licensing for use of film, tape, or slides by a theater or other person

13 taxed under Section 14-410, or by a radio station, television station, or subscription

14 television system.

15 (o) food served to patrons for a consideration by any person engaged in a business properly

16 licensed and taxed under Section 14-455, but not food consumed by owners, agents, or

17 employees of such business.

18 (p) tangible personal property acquired by a qualifying hospital, qualifying community

19 health center or a qualifying health care organization, except when the property is in fact

20 used in activities resulting in gross income from unrelated business income as that term is

21 defined in 26 U.S.C. Section 512.

22 (q) (Reserved) (See Mesa City Page).




Page 183
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (r) the following tangible personal property purchased by persons engaging or continuing in

2 the business of farming, ranching, or feeding livestock, poultry or ratites:

3 (1) seed, fertilizer, fungicides, seed treating chemicals, and other similar chemicals.

4 (2) feed for livestock, poultry or ratites, including salt, vitamins, and other additives

5 to such feed.

6 (3) livestock, poultry or ratites purchased or raised for slaughter, but not including

7 livestock purchased or raised for production or use, such as milch cows, breeding

8 bulls, laying hens, riding or work horses.

9 (4) (Reserved)

10 This exemption shall not be construed to include machinery, equipment, fuels, lubricants,

11 pharmaceuticals, repair and replacement parts, or other items used or consumed in the

12 running, maintenance, or repair of machinery, equipment, buildings, or structures used or

13 consumed in the business of farming, ranching, or feeding of livestock, poultry or ratites.

14 (s) groundwater measuring devices required by A.R.S. Section 45-604.

15 (t) (Reserved)

16 (u) aircraft acquired for use outside the State, as prescribed by Regulation.

17 (v) food products SOLD by FOOD producers as provided for by A.R.S. Section 3-561, 3-562

18 and 3-563.

19 (w) (Reserved)




Page 184
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (x) food and drink provided by a person who is engaged in business that is classified under

2 the restaurant classification without monetary charge to its employees for their own

3 consumption on the premises during such employees' hours of employment.

4 (y) Tangible personal property donated to an organization or entity qualifying as an exempt

5 organization under 26 U.S.C. Section 501(c)(3); if and only if:

6 (1) the donor is engaged or continuing in a business activity subject to a tax imposed

7 by Article IV; and

8 (2) the donor originally purchased the donated property for resale in the ordinary

9 course of the donor's business; and

10 (3) the donor obtained from the donee a letter or other evidence satisfactory to the

11 Tax Collector of qualification under 26 U.S.C. Section 501(c)(3) from the Internal

12 Revenue Service or other appropriate federal agency; and

13 (4) the donor maintains, and provides upon demand, such evidence to the Tax

14 Collector, in a manner similar to other documentation required under Article III.

15 (z) (Reserved)

16 (aa) tangible personal property used in remediation contracting as defined in Section 14-100

17 and Regulation 14-100.5.

18 (bb) materials that are purchased by or for publicly funded libraries including school district

19 libraries, charter school libraries, community college libraries, state university libraries or

20 federal, state, county or municipal libraries for use by the public as follows:

21 (1) printed or photographic materials.




Page 185
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (2) electronic or digital media materials.

2 (cc) food, beverages, condiments and accessories used for serving food and beverages by a

3 commercial airline, as defined in A.R.S. Section 42-5061, that serves the food and

4 beverages to its passengers, without additional charge, for consumption in flight. For the

5 purposes of this subsection, "accessories" means paper plates, plastic eating utensils,

6 napkins, paper cups, drinking straws, paper sacks or other disposable containers, or other

7 items which facilitate the consumption of the food.

8 (dd) wireless telecommunication equipment that is held for sale or transfer to a customer as an

9 inducement to enter into or continue a contract for telecommunication services that are

10 taxable under Section 14-470.

11 (ee) TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY SOLD BY A NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION

12 THAT IS EXEMPT FROM TAXATION UNDER SECTION 501(C)(3), 501(C)(4) OR

13 501(C)(6) OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE IF THE ORGANIZATION IS

14 ASSOCIATED WITH A MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL TEAM OR A NATIONAL

15 TOURING PROFESSIONAL GOLFING ASSOCIATION AND NO PART OF THE

16 ORGANIZATION'S NET EARNINGS INURES TO THE BENEFIT OF ANY

17 PRIVATE SHAREHOLDER OR INDIVIDUAL. THIS PARAGRAPH DOES NOT

18 APPLY TO AN ORGANIZATION THAT IS OWNED, MANAGED OR

19 CONTROLLED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, BY A MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL

20 TEAM, OR ITS OWNERS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS, OR BY A

21 MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL ASSOCIATION OR PROFESSIONAL GOLFING

22 ASSOCIATION, OR ITS OWNERS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS,

23 UNLESS THE ORGANIZATION CONDUCTED OR OPERATED EXHIBITION



Page 186
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 EVENTS IN THIS STATE BEFORE JANUARY 1, 2018 THAT WERE EXEMPT

2 FROM TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE TAX UNDER A.R.S. SECTION 42-5073.

3 (ff) alternative fuel as defined in A.R.S. SECTION § 1-215, by a used oil fuel burner who has

4 received a Department of Environmental Quality permit to burn used oil or used oil fuel

5 under A.R.S. SECTION § 49-426 or A.R.S. SECTION § 49-480.

6 (gg) food, beverages, condiments and accessories purchased by or for a public educational

7 entity, pursuant to any of the provisions of Title 15, Arizona Revised Statutes, including a

8 regularly organized private or parochial school that offers an educational program for

9 grade twelve (12) or under which may be attended in substitution for a public school

10 pursuant to A.R.S. SECTION § 15-802; to the extent such items are to be prepared or

11 served to individuals for consumption on the premises of a public educational entity

12 during school hours. For the purposes of this subsection, "accessories" means paper

13 plates, plastic eating utensils, napkins, paper cups, drinking straws, paper sacks or other

14 disposable containers, or other items which facilitate the consumption of the food.

15 (hh) personal hygiene items purchased by a person engaged in the business of and subject to

16 tax under Section 14-444 of this code if the tangible personal property is furnished

17 without additional charge to and intended to be consumed by the person during his

18 occupancy.

19 (ii) the diversion of gas from a pipeline by a person engaged in the business of operating a

20 natural or artificial gas pipeline, for the sole purpose of fueling compressor equipment to

21 pressurize the pipeline, is not a sale of the gas to the operator of the pipeline.




Page 187
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (jj) food, beverages, condiments and accessories purchased by or for a nonprofit charitable

2 organization that has qualified as an exempt organization under 26 U.S.C. Section

3 501(c)(3) and regularly serves meals to the needy and indigent on a continuing basis at no

4 cost. For the purposes of this subsection, "accessories" means paper plates, plastic eating

5 utensils, napkins, paper cups, drinking straws, paper sacks or other disposable containers,

6 or other items which facilitate the consumption of the food.

7 (kk) sales of motor vehicles that use alternative fuel if such vehicle was manufactured as a

8 diesel fuel vehicle and converted to operate on alternative fuel and sales of equipment

9 that is installed in a conventional diesel fuel motor vehicle to convert the vehicle to

10 operate on an alternative fuel, as defined in A.R.S. SECTION § 1-215.

11 (ll) the storage, use or consumption of tangible personal property in the city or town by a

12 school district or charter school.

13 (mm) renewable energy credits or any other unit created to track energy derived from

14 renewable energy resources. For the purposes of this paragraph, "renewable energy

15 credit" means a unit created administratively by the corporation commission or governing

16 body of a public power utility to track kilowatt hours of electricity derived from a

17 renewable energy resource or the kilowatt hour equivalent of conventional energy

18 resources displaced by distributed renewable energy resources.

19 (nn) magazines or other periodicals or other publications by this state to encourage tourist

20 travel.

21 (oo) paper machine clothing, such as forming fabrics and dryer felts, sold to a paper

22 manufacturer and directly used or consumed in paper manufacturing.




Page 188
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (pp) overhead materials or other tangible personal property that is used in performing a

2 contract between the United States government and a manufacturer, modifier, assembler

3 or repairer, including property used in performing a subcontract with a government

4 contractor who is a manufacturer, modifier, assembler or repairer, to which title passes to

5 the government under the terms of the contract or subcontract.

6 (qq) coal, petroleum, coke, natural gas, virgin fuel oil and electricity sold to a qualified

7 environmental technology manufacturer, producer or processor as defined in A.R.S.

8 SECTION § 41-1514.02 and directly used or consumed in the generation or provision of

9 on-site power or energy solely for environmental technology manufacturing, producing

10 or processing or environmental protection. This paragraph shall apply for twenty full

11 consecutive calendar or fiscal years from the date the first paper manufacturing machine

12 is placed in service. In the case of an environmental technology manufacturer, producer

13 or processor who does not manufacture paper, the time period shall begin with the date

14 the first manufacturing, processing or production equipment is placed in service.

15 (rr) machinery, equipment, materials and other tangible personal property used directly and

16 predominantly to construct a qualified environmental technology manufacturing,

17 producing or processing facility as described in A.R.S. SECTION § 41-1514.02. This

18 subsection applies for ten full consecutive calendar or fiscal years after the start of initial

19 construction.

20 (ss) (Reserved)

21 (TT) THE TRANSFER OF TITLE OR POSSESSION OF COAL BACK AND FORTH

22 BETWEEN AN OWNER OR OPERATOR OF A POWER PLANT AND A PERSON




Page 189
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REFINING COAL IF BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING

2 APPLY:

3 (1) THE TRANSFER OF TITLE OR POSSESSION OF THE COAL IS FOR THE

4 PURPOSE OF REFINING THE COAL; AND

5 (2) THE TITLE OR POSSESSION OF THE COAL IS TRANSFERRED BACK TO

6 THE OWNER OR OPERATOR OF THE POWER PLANT AFTER

7 COMPLETION OF THE COAL REFINING PROCESS. FOR THE PURPOSES

8 OF THIS SUBDIVISION, "COAL REFINING PROCESS" MEANS THE

9 APPLICATION OF A COAL ADDITIVE SYSTEM THAT AIDS THE

10 REDUCTION OF POWER PLANT EMISSIONS DURING THE

11 COMBUSTION OF COAL AND THE TREATMENT OF FLUE GAS.

12 (UU) COMPUTER DATA CENTER EQUIPMENT PURCHASED BY THE OWNER,

13 OPERATOR OR QUALIFIED COLOCATION TENANT OF THE A COMPUTER

14 DATA CENTER THAT IS CERTIFIED BY THE ARIZONA COMMERCE

15 AUTHORITY UNDER A.R.S. SECTION 41-1519 OR AN AUTHORIZED AGENT OF

16 THE OWNER, OPERATOR OR QUALIFIED COLOCATION TENANT DURING

17 THE QUALIFICATION PERIOD FOR USE IN THE QUALIFIED COMPUTER DATA

18 CENTER. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PARAGRAPH, "COMPUTER DATA

19 CENTER", "COMPUTER DATA CENTER EQUIPMENT", "QUALIFICATION

20 PERIOD" AND "QUALIFIED COLOCATION TENANT" HAVE THE SAME

21 MEANINGS PRESCRIBED IN A.R.S. SECTION 41-1519.




Page 190
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (VV) JET FUEL USE TAX IMPOSED UNDER SECTION 14-610 ON THE STORAGE, USE

2 OR CONSUMPTION IN THIS CITY OF JET FUEL PURCHASED FROM A

3 RETAILER IN ANY CASE IN WHICH THE TAX IMPOSED UNDER SECTION 14-

4 422 HAS NOT BEEN PAID IS LIMITED TO AMOUNTS OF NOT MORE THAN TEN

5 MILLION GALLONS OF JET FUEL PURCHASED IN EACH CALENDAR YEAR.

6 PURCHASES IN EXCESS OF TEN MILLION GALLONS PER YEAR ARE DEEMED

7 EXEMPT.

8 (WW) THE PURCHASE MANUFACTURE, WHOLESALE OR DISTRIBUTION TO OR

9 AMONG ANY WHOLESALERS, DISTRIBUTORS OR RETAILERS, OF FOOD

10 ITEMS INTENDED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION AS DEFINED BY RULE

11 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO A.R.S. SECTION 42-5106 OR ITEMS PRESCRIBED BY

12 A.R.S. SECTION 42-5106, SUBSECTION D FOR HOME CONSUMPTION OR FOR

13 CONSUMPTION ON THE PREMISES.

14 (YY) THE PURCHASE OF ANY CONTAINER OR PACKAGING USED EXCLUSIVELY

15 FOR TRANSPORTING, PROTECTING OR CONSUMING FOOD ITEMS

16 INTENDED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION AS DEFINED BY RULE ADOPTED

17 PURSUANT TO A.R.S. SECTION 42-5106 OR ITEMS PRESCRIBED BY A.R.S.

18 SECTION 42-5106, SUBSECTION D FOR HOME CONSUMPTION OR FOR

19 CONSUMPTION ON THE PREMISES.


21 Section XVI. Phoenix City Code Section 14-416 is amended as follows; Section 14-416.1 is

22 added as follows, repealing and replacing Regulation 14-416.1; and Section 416.2 is added




Page 191
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 as follows, repealing and replacing Regulation 416.2, all effective from and after April 1,

2 2019.


4 Sec. 14-416. Construction contracting: speculative builders.

5 (a) The tax shall be equal to two and three-tenths percent (2.3%) of the gross income from

6 the business activity upon every person engaging or continuing in business as a

7 speculative builder within the City.

8 (1) The gross income of a speculative builder considered taxable shall include the

9 total selling price from the sale of improved real property at the time of closing of

10 escrow or transfer of title.

11 (2) "Improved Real Property" means any real property:

12 (A) upon which a NEW structure has been constructed SUBSTANTIALLY

13 COMPLETED; or

14 (B) where improvements have been made to land containing no structure (such

15 as paving or landscaping); or

16 (C) which has been reconstructed as provided by Regulation SECTION 14-

17 416.2; or

18 (D) where water, power, and streets have been constructed to the property line.

19 FOR THE PURPOSE OF PARAGRAPH (A), ONCE A STRUCTURE HAS

20 BEEN DEEMED “SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETE”, SUBSEQUENT

21 IMPROVEMENTS TO THE STRUCTURE SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED




Page 192
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING THE DATE ON WHICH A SALE

2 TRANSACTION WOULD BE TAXABLE UNDER THIS SECTION.

3 (3) "Sale of Improved Real Property" includes any form of transaction, whether

4 characterized as a lease or otherwise, which in substance is a transfer of title of, or

5 equitable ownership in, improved real property and includes any lease of the

6 property for a term of thirty (30) years or more (with all options for renewal being

7 included as a part of the term). In the case of multiple unit projects, "sale" refers

8 to the sale of the entire project or to the sale of any individual parcel or unit.

9 (4) "Partially Improved Residential Real Property", as used in this Section, means

10 any improved real property, as defined in subsection (a)(2) above, being

11 developed for sale to individual homeowners, where the construction of the

12 residence upon IMPROVEMENT TO such property is not substantially complete

13 at the time of the sale.

14 (b) Exclusions.

15 (1) In cases involving reconstruction contracting, the speculative builder may exclude

16 from gross income the prior value allowed for reconstruction contracting in

17 determining his taxable gross income, as provided by Regulation SECTION 14-

18 416.2.

19 (2) Neither the cost nor the fair market value of the land which constitutes part of the

20 improved real property sold may be excluded or deducted from gross income

21 subject to the tax imposed by this Section.

22 (3) (Reserved)




Page 193
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (4) A speculative builder may exclude gross income from the sale of partially

2 improved residential real property as defined in (a)(4) above to another

3 speculative builder only if all of the following conditions are satisfied:

4 (A) The speculative builder purchasing the partially improved residential real

5 property has a valid City MUNICIPAL privilege TAX license for

6 construction contracting as a speculative builder; and

7 (B) At the time of the transaction, the purchaser provides the seller with a

8 properly completed written declaration that the purchaser assumes liability

9 for and will pay all privilege taxes which would otherwise be due the City

10 at the time of sale of the partially improved residential real property; and

11 (C) The seller also:

12 (i) maintains proper records of such transactions in a manner similar

13 to the requirements provided in this chapter relating to sales for

14 resale; and

15 (ii) retains a copy of the written declaration provided by the buyer for

16 the transaction; and

17 (iii) is properly licensed with the City as a speculative builder and

18 provides the City with the written declaration attached to the City

19 privilege tax return where he claims the exclusion.

20 (5) For taxable periods beginning from and after July 1, 2008, the portion of gross

21 proceeds of sales or gross income attributable to the actual direct costs of




Page 194
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 providing architectural or engineering services that are incorporated in a contract

2 is not subject to tax under this section. For the purposes of this subsection, "direct

3 costs" means the portion of the actual costs that are directly expended in

4 providing architectural or engineering services.

5 (c) Tax liability for speculative builders occurs at close of escrow or transfer of title,

6 whichever occurs earlier, and is subject to the following provisions, relating to

7 exemptions, deductions and tax credits:

8 (1) Exemptions.

9 (A) The gross proceeds of sales or gross income attributable to the purchase of

10 machinery, equipment or other tangible personal property that is exempt

11 from or deductible from privilege or use tax under:

12 (i) Section 14-465, subsections (g) and (p)

13 (ii) Section 14-660, subsections (g) and (p);

14 shall be exempt or deductible, respectively, from the tax imposed by this

15 section.

16 (B) The gross proceeds of sales or gross income received from a contract for

17 the construction of an environmentally controlled facility for the raising of

18 poultry for the production of eggs and the sorting, or cooling and

19 packaging of eggs shall be exempt from the tax imposed under this

20 section.




Page 195
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (C) The gross proceeds of sales or gross income that is derived from the

2 installation, assembly, repair or maintenance of cleanrooms that are

3 deducted from the tax base of the retail classification pursuant to Section

4 14-465, subsection (g) shall be exempt from the tax imposed under this

5 section.

6 (D) The gross proceeds of sales or gross income that is derived from a contract

7 entered into with a person who is engaged in the commercial production of

8 livestock, livestock products or agricultural, horticultural, viticultural or

9 floricultural crops or products in this state for the construction, alteration,

10 repair, improvement, movement, wrecking or demolition or addition to or

11 subtraction from any building, highway, road, excavation, manufactured

12 building or other structure, project, development or improvement used

13 directly and primarily to prevent, monitor, control or reduce air, water or

14 land pollution shall be exempt from the tax imposed under this section.

15 (E) Any amount attributable to development fees that are incurred in relation

16 to the construction, development or improvement of real property and paid

17 by the taxpayer as defined in the model city tax code or by a contractor

18 providing services to the taxpayer shall be exempt from the tax imposed

19 under this section. For the purposes of this paragraph:

20 (i) the attributable amount shall not exceed the value of the

21 development fees actually imposed.




Page 196
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (ii) the attributable amount is equal to the total amount of development

2 fees paid by the taxpayer or by a contractor providing services to

3 the taxpayer and the total development fees credited in exchange

4 for the construction of, contribution to or dedication of real

5 property for providing public infrastructure, public safety or other

6 public services necessary to the development. The real property

7 must be the subject of the development fees.

8 (iii) "development fees" means fees imposed to offset capital costs of

9 providing public infrastructure, public safety or other public

10 services to a development and authorized pursuant to A.R.S.

11 Section 9-463.05, A.R.S. Section 11-1102 or A.R.S. Title 48

12 regardless of the jurisdiction to which the fees are paid.

13 (F) THE GROSS PROCEEDS OF SALES OR GROSS INCOME THAT IS

14 DERIVED FROM THE VALUE OF EXISTING TENANT LEASES IN

15 PLACE AT THE TIME OF THE SALE SHALL BE EXEMPT FROM

16 TAX IMPOSED UNDER THIS SECTION. THE VALUE OF THE IN-

17 PLACE LEASES SHALL BE DETERMINED AS OF THE CLOSE OF

18 ESCROW OR TRANSFER OF TITLE AS FOLLOWS:

19 (I) FOR A RESIDENTIAL LEASE, THE VALUE OF THE IN-

20 PLACE LEASE IS THE TOTAL VALUE OF ALL EXPECTED

21 LEASE RECEIPTS THROUGH THE END OF THE CURRENT

22 LEASE TERM MULTIPLIED BY A FACTOR OF 1.5.

23 EXPECTED LEASE RECEIPTS INCLUDE NON-



Page 197
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 REFUNDABLE DEPOSITS AND EXCLUDES ALL

2 REFUNDABLE DEPOSITS REGARDLESS OF WHETHER

3 THE REFUNDABLE DEPOSIT MAY BE FORFEITED.

4 (II) FOR A COMMERCIAL LEASE, THE VALUE OF THE IN-

5 PLACE LEASE IS THE PRESENT VALUE OF THE

6 EXPECTED LEASE RECEIPTS THROUGH THE END OF THE

7 CURRENT LEASE TERM OR FIRST OPTION OF EITHER

8 PARTY TO TERMINATE THE LEASE, WHICHEVER IS LESS.

9 THE DISCOUNT RATE USED TO CALCULATE THE

10 PRESENT VALUE SHALL BE THE 100% MID-TERM

11 APPLICABLE FEDERAL RATE PUBLISHED BY THE

12 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE ASSOCIATED WITH THE

13 PAYMENT TERMS OF THE LEASE RELATED TO THE

14 MONTH PRECEDING THE CLOSE OF ESCROW PLUS

15 THREE (3) PERCENTAGE POINTS.

16 A TRANSACTION, WHETHER CHARACTERIZED AS A LEASE OR

17 OTHERWISE, WHICH IN SUBSTANCE IS A TRANSFER OF TITLE

18 OF OR EQUITABLE OWNERSHIP IN IMPROVED REAL

19 PROPERTY, INCLUDING ANY LEASE OF THE PROPERTY FOR A

20 TERM OF THIRTY (30) YEARS OR MORE (WITH ALL OPTIONS

21 FOR RENEWAL BEING INCLUDED AS A PART OF THE TERM) IS

22 DEEMED TO BE A SALE OF IMPROVED REAL PROPERTY




Page 198
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (A)(3) OF THIS SECTION AND IS

2 NOT CONSIDERED AN IN-PLACE LEASE.

3 (2) Deductions.

4 (A) ALL STATE AND COUNTY TAXES ASSOCIATED WITH THE

5 PROJECT AND REPORTED AND PAID TO THE DEPARTMENT OF

6 REVENUE BY A CONTRACTOR CONSTRUCTING THE

7 IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY SHALL BE DEDUCTED

8 FROM THE SELLING PRICE.

9 (B) All amounts subject to the tax shall be allowed a deduction in the amount

10 of thirty-five percent (35%).

11 (B)(C) The gross proceeds of sales or gross income that is derived from a contract

12 entered into for the installation, assembly, repair or maintenance of

13 income-producing capital equipment, as defined in Section 14-110, that is

14 deducted from the retail classification pursuant to Section 14-465(g), that

15 does not become a permanent attachment to a building, highway, road,

16 railroad, excavation or manufactured building or other structure, project,

17 development or improvement shall be exempt from the tax imposed by

18 this Section. If the ownership of the realty is separate from the ownership

19 of the income-producing capital equipment, the determination as to

20 permanent attachment shall be made as if the ownership was the same.

21 The deduction provided in this paragraph does not include gross proceeds

22 of sales or gross income from that portion of any contracting activity




Page 199
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 which consists of the development of, or modification to, real property in

2 order to facilitate the installation, assembly, repair, maintenance or

3 removal of the income-producing capital equipment. For purposes of this

4 paragraph, "permanent attachment" means at least one of the following:

5 (i) to be incorporated into real property.

6 (ii) to become so affixed to real property that it becomes part of the

7 real property.

8 (iii) to be so attached to real property that removal would cause

9 substantial damage to the real property from which it is removed.

10 (C)(D) For taxable periods beginning from and after July 1, 2008 and ending

11 before January 1, 2017, the gross proceeds of sales or gross income

12 derived from a contract to provide and install a solar energy device. The

13 contractor shall register with the Department of Revenue as a solar energy

14 contractor. By registering, the contractor acknowledges that it will make

15 its books and records relating to sales of solar energy devices available to

16 the Department of Revenue and the City, as applicable, for examination.

17 (3) Tax credits.

18 The following tax credits are available to owner-builders or speculative builders, not to

19 exceed the tax liability against which such credits apply, provided such credits are

20 documented to the satisfaction of the Tax Collector:




Page 200
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (A) A tax credit equal to the amount of city privilege or use tax, or the equivalent

2 excise tax, paid directly to a taxing jurisdiction or as a separately itemized charge

3 paid directly to the vendor with respect to the tangible personal property

4 incorporated into the said structure or improvement to real property undertaken by

5 the owner-builder or speculative builder.

6 (B) A tax credit equal to the amount of privilege taxes paid to this City, or charged

7 separately to the speculative builder, by a construction contractor, on the gross

8 income derived by said person from the construction of any improvement to the

9 real property.

10 (C) A TAX CREDIT EQUAL TO THE AMOUNT OF PRIVILEGE TAXES PAID

11 TO THIS CITY BY ANY SPECULATIVE BUILDER ON THE GROSS

12 INCOME DERIVED BY SAID PERSON FROM THE SALE OF IMPROVED

13 REAL PROPERTY PURSUANT TO SUBSECTIONS (A)(2)(B) or (A)(2)(D) OF

14 THIS SECTION AGAINST THE GROSS INCOME OF ANY SPECULATIVE

15 BUILDER FROM THE SALE OF IMPROVED REAL PROPERTY

16 PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (A)(2)(A).

17 (C)(D) No credits provided herein may be claimed until such time that the gross income

18 against which said credits apply is reported.


20 SECTION 14-416.1. SPECULATIVE BUILDERS: HOMEOWNER'S BONA FIDE NON-

21 BUSINESS SALE OF A FAMILY RESIDENCE.





Page 201
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (A) A SALE OF A HOME, REGARDLESS OF THE STAGE OF COMPLETION OF SUCH

2 HOME SHALL BE CONSIDERED A "HOMEOWNER'S BONA FIDE NON-

3 BUSINESS SALE" AND NOT SUBJECT TO THE TAX ON SPECULATIVE

4 BUILDERS IF:

5 (1) THE PROPERTY WAS ACTUALLY USED AS THE PRINCIPAL PLACE OF

6 FAMILY RESIDENCE OR VACATION RESIDENCE BY THE IMMEDIATE

7 FAMILY OF THE SELLER FOR THE SIX (6) MONTHS NEXT PRIOR TO

8 THE OFFER FOR SALE; AND

9 (2) THE SELLER HAS NOT SOLD MORE THAN TWO (2) SUCH RESIDENCES

10 (OR, IF THE RESIDENCE IS A VACATION RESIDENCE, TWO (2) SUCH

11 VACATION RESIDENCES) WITHIN THE THIRTY-SIX (36) MONTHS

12 IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO THE OFFER FOR SALE; AND

13 (3) THE SELLER HAS NOT LICENSED, LEASED, OR RENTED THE SOLD

14 PREMISES FOR ANY PERIOD WITHIN TWENTY-FOUR (24) MONTHS

15 PRIOR TO THE OFFER FOR SALE.

16 (B) IN THE EVENT THAT A HOMEOWNER OF A FAMILY RESIDENCE

17 CONTRACTS WITH A LICENSED CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR FOR

18 IMPROVEMENTS TO A RESIDENCE, THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTING ON

19 A FAMILY RESIDENCE SHALL BE PRESUMED TO BE FOR AN OWNER'S BONA

20 FIDE NON-BUSINESS PURPOSE AND ALL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS

21 SHALL BE REQUIRED TO REPORT AND PAY THE TAX IMPOSED ON ALL

22 SUCH IMPROVEMENTS.




Page 202
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (C) PURCHASES BY A HOMEOWNER OF TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY FOR

2 INCLUSION IN ANY CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, OR REPAIR OF HIS

3 RESIDENCE SHALL BE SUBJECT TO TAX AS RETAIL SALES TO THE

4 ULTIMATE CONSUMER.

5 (D) "OWNER", "HOMEOWNER", AND “SELLER” AS USED IN THIS SECTION SHALL

6 ONLY MEAN AN INDIVIDUAL OR QUALIFIED TRUST, AND NO OTHER

7 ENTITY, ASSOCIATION, OR REPRESENTATIVE SHALL QUALIFY; EXCEPT

8 THAT AN ADMINISTRATOR, EXECUTOR, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE, OR

9 GUARDIAN IN GUARDIANSHIP OR PROBATE PROCEEDINGS, FOR THE

10 ESTATE OF A DECEASED OR INCOMPETENT PERSON OR A MINOR, MAY

11 CLAIM "HOMEOWNER" STATUS FOR SUCH PERSON IF SUCH PERSON

12 WOULD HAVE OTHERWISE QUALIFIED WITH RESPECT TO THE SPECIFIC

13 PROPERTY INVOLVED.

14 (E) “QUALIFIED TRUST” AS USED IN THIS SECTION MEANS ANY LEGAL TRUST

15 WHERE A BENEFICIARY OF THE TRUST IS AN INDIVIDUAL THAT HAS BEEN

16 THE RESIDENT OF THE PROPERTY AND THAT INDIVIDUAL MEETS THE

17 CRITERIA LISTED IN SUBSECTION (A) OF THIS SECTION.


19 Reg. 14-416.1. Speculative builders: homeowner's bona fide non-business sale of a family

20 residence.





Page 203
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (a) A sale of a custom home, regardless of the stage of completion of such home shall be

2 considered a "homeowner's bona fide non-business sale" and not subject to the tax on

3 speculative builders if:

4 (1) the property was actually used as the principal place of family residence or

5 vacation residence by the immediate family of the seller for the six (6) months

6 next prior to the offer for sale; and

7 (2) the seller has not sold more than two (2) such residences (or, if the residence is a

8 vacation residence, two (2) such vacation residences) within the thirty-six (36)

9 months immediately prior to the offer for sale; and

10 (3) the seller has not licensed, leased, or rented the sold premises for any period

11 within twenty-four (24) months prior to the offer for sale.

12 (b) In the event that a homeowner of a family residence contracts with a licensed

13 construction contractor for improvements to a residence, the construction contracting on a

14 family residence shall be presumed to be for an owner's bona fide non-business purpose

15 and all construction contractors shall be required to report and pay the tax imposed on all

16 such improvements.

17 (c) Purchases by a homeowner of tangible personal property for inclusion in any

18 construction, alteration, or repair of his residence shall be subject to tax as retail sales to

19 the ultimate consumer.

20 (d) "Owner" and "Homeowner" as used in this Regulation shall only mean an individual, and

21 no other entity, association, or representative shall qualify; except that an administrator,

22 executor, personal representative, or guardian in guardianship or probate proceedings, for




Page 204
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 the estate of a deceased or incompetent person or a minor, may claim "homeowner" status

2 for such person if such person would have otherwise qualified with respect to the specific

3 property involved.


5 SECTION 14-416.2. RECONSTRUCTION CONTRACTING.


7 (A) "RECONSTRUCTION (OF REAL PROPERTY)" SHALL MEAN THE SUBDIVIDING

8 OF REAL PROPERTY AND, IN ADDITION, ALL CONSTRUCTION

9 CONTRACTING ACTIVITIES PERFORMED UPON SAID REAL PROPERTY;

10 PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT EACH OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE

11 MET:

12 (1) A STRUCTURE EXISTED ON SAID REAL PROPERTY PRIOR TO THE

13 RECONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY; AND

14 (2) THE "PRIOR VALUE" OF SAID STRUCTURE EXCEEDS FIFTEEN

15 PERCENT (15%) OF THE "PRIOR VALUE" OF THE INTEGRATED

16 PROPERTY (LAND, IMPROVEMENTS, AND STRUCTURE); AND

17 (3) THE TOTAL COST OF ALL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTING

18 ACTIVITIES PERFORMED ON SAID REAL PROPERTY IN THE TWENTY-

19 FOUR (24) MONTH PERIOD PRIOR TO THE SALE OF ANY PART OF THE

20 REAL PROPERTY EXCEEDS FIFTEEN PERCENT (15%) OF THE "PRIOR

21 VALUE" OF THE REAL PROPERTY; AND




Page 205
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (4) THE STRUCTURE WHICH EXISTED ON THE REAL PROPERTY PRIOR TO

2 THE RECONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY STILL EXISTS IN SOME FORM

3 UPON THE PROPERTY, AND IS INCLUDED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN

4 THE PROPERTY SOLD.

5 (B) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (C) BELOW, "PRIOR VALUE" MEANS

6 THE VALUE OF THE TOTAL INTEGRATED PROPERTY, WITH

7 IMPROVEMENTS, AS EXISTING IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO ANY

8 RECONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. WHERE, ACCORDING TO TITLE 42 OF THE

9 ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, A PROPERTY'S FULL CASH VALUE FOR

10 SECONDARY TAX PURPOSES IS INTENDED TO REPRESENT THE PROPERTY'S

11 FAIR MARKET VALUE, "PRIOR VALUE" SHALL BE THE PROPERTY'S FULL

12 CASH VALUE FOR SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX PURPOSES AS

13 DETERMINED BY THE COUNTY ASSESSOR IN THE YEAR IMMEDIATELY

14 PRECEDING THE YEAR IN WHICH THE RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT(S)

15 ARE OR COULD HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE COUNTY ASSESSOR'S

16 VALUATION. IF THE COUNTY ASSESSOR'S VALUATION IS CONTESTED OR

17 APPEALED, THE FINAL DETERMINATION AT EITHER THE ADMINISTRATIVE

18 OR JUDICIAL LEVEL SHALL APPLY. WHERE, ACCORDING TO TITLE 42 OF

19 THE ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, A PROPERTY'S FULL CASH VALUE FOR

20 SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX PURPOSES IS NOT INTENDED TO REPRESENT

21 THE PROPERTY'S FAIR MARKET VALUE, "PRIOR VALUE" SHALL BE THE

22 PROPERTY'S FAIR MARKET VALUE PRIOR TO THE RECONSTRUCTION

23 IMPROVEMENT(S).




Page 206
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (C) "ALTERNATIVE PRIOR VALUE" SHALL MEAN THAT AS AN ALTERNATIVE

2 TO THE "PRIOR VALUE" DEFINED ABOVE, THE TAXPAYER MAY USE HIS

3 ACTUAL COST OF THE RECONSTRUCTED PROPERTY PRIOR TO

4 RECONSTRUCTION, PROVIDED THAT EVIDENCE OF SUCH COST IS

5 PRESENTED TO THE TAX COLLECTOR AND IS DETERMINED BY THE TAX

6 COLLECTOR, IN HIS SOLE DISCRETION, TO BE SATISFACTORY. SUCH

7 EVIDENCE SHALL CONSIST, AT A MINIMUM, OF PROOF OF THE ACTUAL,

8 ARMS-LENGTH ACQUISITION PRICE, ACCOMPANIED BY A FULL APPRAISAL

9 OF ALL PROPERTY INVOLVED WHICH APPRAISAL SHALL HAVE BEEN

10 PERFORMED BY A REAL ESTATE BROKER OR MAI APPRAISER

11 SPECIFICALLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING IN THE ACQUISITION AND

12 FURTHER SHALL HAVE BEEN PERFORMED ON BEHALF OF THE SELLER OR

13 A LENDING INSTITUTION WHICH HAS LENT AT LEAST SIXTY-FIVE

14 PERCENT (65%) OF THE ACQUISITION PRICE. (ONLY LONG-TERM LENDING -

15 NOT INTERIM OR CONSTRUCTION FINANCING WILL BE CONSIDERED.) THIS

16 ALTERNATIVE VALUE SHALL BE USED ONLY IF THE PROPERTY WAS

17 ACQUIRED BY THE RECONSTRUCTION TAXPAYER NOT MORE THAN

18 THIRTY-SIX (36) MONTHS PRIOR TO A "SALE" AS DEFINED BELOW.

19 (D) A "SALE" FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING "ALTERNATIVE PRIOR

20 VALUE" OR "RECONSTRUCTION" ONLY SHALL BE DEEMED TO HAVE

21 OCCURRED AS OF THE DATE OF THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT OF SALE

22 OR A DEED (JOINT TENANCY OR WARRANTY) WHICHEVER IS EARLIER, TO

23 A PURCHASER OR GRANTEE OF ANY SINGLE RESIDENTIAL OR OTHER




Page 207
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 OCCUPANCY UNIT. IN ADDITION TO THE FOREGOING, A LEASE WITH

2 OPTION TO PURCHASE A SINGLE RESIDENTIAL UNIT SHALL BE

3 CONSIDERED A "SALE" AT THE DATE OF EXECUTION OF SUCH LEASE IF

4 SAID OPTION IS EXERCISABLE BY THE LESSEE IN NOT LATER THAN NINE

5 (9) MONTHS. FURTHER IN THE CASE OF COOPERATIVE APARTMENTS, THE

6 SALE DATE SHALL BE THE DATE OF EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT

7 SELLING (SUBJECT OR NOT TO ENCUMBRANCES, LIENS OR SECURITY

8 INTERESTS) OF A SHARE, OR A SUFFICIENT NUMBER OF SHARES WHICH

9 ENTITLE THE PURCHASER TO THE OCCUPANCY OF A RESIDENTIAL UNIT.

10 IN ALL CASES A PERSON SHALL INCLUDE A HUSBAND AND WIFE AS A

11 COMMUNITY, OR ANY CO-OCCUPANTS OF A SINGLE UNIT AS JOINT

12 TENANTS.


14 Reg. 14-416.2. Reconstruction contracting.


16 (a) "Reconstruction (of Real Property)" shall mean the subdividing of real property and, in

17 addition, all construction contracting activities performed upon said real property;

18 provided, however, that each of the following conditions are met:

19 (1) a structure existed on said real property prior to the reconstruction activity; and

20 (2) the "prior value" of said structure exceeds fifteen percent (15%) of the "prior

21 value" of the integrated property (land, improvements, and structure); and




Page 208
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 (3) the total cost of all construction contracting activities performed on said real

2 property in the twenty-four (24) month period prior to the sale of any part of the

3 real property exceeds fifteen percent (15%) of the "prior value" of the real

4 property; and

5 (4) the structure which existed on the real property prior to the reconstruction activity

6 still exists in some form upon the property, and is included, in whole or in part, in

7 the property sold.

8 (b) Except as provided in subsection (c) below, "prior value" means the value of the total

9 integrated property, with improvements, as existing immediately prior to any

10 reconstruction activity. Where, according to Title 42 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, a

11 property's full cash value for secondary tax purposes is intended to represent the

12 property's fair market value, "prior value" shall be the property's full cash value for

13 secondary property tax purposes as determined by the County Assessor in the year

14 immediately preceding the year in which the reconstruction improvement(s) are or could

15 have been included in the County Assessor's valuation. If the County Assessor's valuation

16 is contested or appealed, the final determination at either the administrative or judicial

17 level shall apply. Where, according to Title 42 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, a

18 property's full cash value for secondary property tax purposes is not intended to represent

19 the property's fair market value, "prior value" shall be the property's fair market value

20 prior to the reconstruction improvement(s).

21 (c) "Alternative Prior Value" shall mean that as an alternative to the "prior value" defined

22 above, the taxpayer may use his actual cost of the reconstructed property prior to

23 reconstruction, provided that evidence of such cost is presented to the Tax Collector and



Page 209
Attachment B
Amendments to the Phoenix City (Tax) Code
1 is determined by the Tax Collector, in his sole discretion, to be satisfactory. Such

2 evidence shall consist, at a minimum, of proof of the actual, arms-length acquisition

3 price, accompanied by a full appraisal of all property involved which appraisal shall have

4 been performed by a real estate broker or MAI appraiser specifically for the purpose of

5 assisting in the acquisition and further shall have been performed on behalf of the seller

6 or a lending institution which has lent at least sixty-five percent (65%) of the acquisition

7 price. (Only long term lending - not interim or construction financing will be considered.)

8 This alternative value shall be used only if the property was acquired by the

9 reconstruction taxpayer not more than thirty-six (36) months prior to a "sale" as defined

10 below.

11 (d) A "sale" for the purpose of determining "alternative prior value" or "reconstruction" only

12 shall be deemed to have occurred as of the date of the execution of a contract of sale or a

13 deed (joint tenancy or warranty) whichever is earlier, to a purchaser or grantee of any

14 single residential or other occupancy unit. In addition to the foregoing, a lease with

15 option to purchase a single residential unit shall be considered a "sale" at the date of

16 execution of such lease if said option is exercisable by the lessee in not later than nine (9)

17 months. Further in the case of cooperative apartments, the sale date shall be the date of

18 execution of the contract selling (subject or not to encumbrances, liens or security

19 interests) of a share, or a sufficient number of shares which entitle the purchaser to the

20 occupancy of a residential unit. In all cases a person shall include a husband and wife as a

21 community, or any co -occupants of a single unit as joint tenants.





Page 210



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acceptance and Dedication of Deeds and Easements for Roadway, Sidewalk and
Public Utility Purposes (Ordinance S-47304)

Request for the City Council to accept and dedicate deeds and easements for
roadway, sidewalk and public utility purposes; further ordering the ordinance recorded.

Summary
Accepting the property interests below will meet the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.

Deed (a)
Applicant: RD Deer Valley, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Roadway
Location: 24100 N. 19th Ave.
File: FN 200605
Council District: 1

Deed (b)
Applicant: James Frank Cole and Marlene Michelle Cole aka Michele Cole, its
successor and assigns
Purpose: Roadway
Location: 25513 N. 15th Ave.
File: FN 200615
Council District: 1

Easement (c)
Applicant: North Valley Romanian Pentecostal Church Inc., its successor and
assigns
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: 25435 N. 15th Ave.
File: FN 200633
Council District: 1




Page 211

Easement (d)
Applicant: Sharon Kay Thompson, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 8807 N. 11th Ave.
File: FN 200620
Council District: 3

Easement (e)
Applicant: Marisol Zenaida Aragon Herold, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 2610 N. 15th St.
File: FN 200634
Council District: 4

Easement (f)
Applicant: Timothy Herold, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 1432 E. Virginia Ave.
File: FN 200634
Council District: 4

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development and Finance departments.




Page 212



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acceptance of Easements for Drainage and Water Purposes (Ordinance S-47305)

Request for the City Council to accept easements for drainage and water purposes;
further ordering the ordinance recorded.

Summary
Accepting the property interests below will meet the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.

Easement (a)
Applicant: Elux Deer Valley Project, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Drainage
Location: 1717 W. Happy Valley Road
File: FN 200618
Council District: 1

Easement (b)
Applicant: Elux Deer Valley Project, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Water
Location: 1717 W. Happy Valley Road
File: FN 200618
Council District: 1

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development and Finance departments.




Page 213



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acquisition of Real Property for Sky Harbor International Airport - 4108 E. Air
Lane (Ordinance S-47320)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to perform all acts necessary
to acquire fee title to and possession of certain real property located at 4108 E. Air
Lane, Phoenix, Arizona, together with associated improvements, appurtenances, and
other property rights (Property). Acquisition is to be by voluntary purchase from Adonai
Properties, LLC at a price not to exceed the Property's appraised value of $775,000.

Further request authorization to enter into a temporary occupancy agreement to allow
the occupant time to vacate the Property as may be necessary to and in furtherance of
this acquisition. The purchase agreement may contain other terms and conditions
deemed necessary or appropriate. Additionally request to authorize the City Controller
to disburse, and the City Treasurer to accept, all funds related to this item.

Summary
Adonai Properties, LLC (Adonai) initiated the voluntary acquisition process in
September 2018. The Property consists of a 17,930 square foot parcel, which is
improved with an office building and warehouse structure totaling 12,355 square feet.
The property includes other improvements, and it is currently occupied. Fortis
Networks, Inc., the tenant, is a minority owned design-build general contractor that
intends to relocate its office closer to downtown. An independent appraisal, Phase I
and Phase II Environmental Assessments, and testing have been conducted on the
Property. The results of the environmental due diligence indicate the Property does not
require environmental remediation, and the appraiser has concluded there are no
adverse effects on market value.

This Property is located just north of Sky Harbor International Airport's fence line. As
such, this transaction constitutes a strategic voluntary acquisition that is important to
the Airport's future growth. Once the Property is acquired, the Aviation Department will
demolish the improvements and prepare it for future airport development.

Financial Impact
The Property's purchase price is $775,000, plus the usual and customary closing
costs. Funds are available in the Aviation Department's Capital Improvement Program.


Page 214


Concurrence/Previous Council Action
· The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board recommended this item for approval on Jan.
21, 2021, by a vote of 8-0.
· The Transportation, Infrastructure and Innovation Subcommittee recommended this
item for approval on Feb. 3, 2021, by a vote of 4-0.

Public Outreach
Adonai is interested in selling the Property to the City. Staff has met with Adonai on
several occasions to address questions.

Location
4108 E. Air Lane, identified by Maricopa County Assessor's parcel number 124-01-
004.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation and
Finance departments.




Page 215



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Enter into Land Use License with Salt River Project for Patrick
Park Plaza (Ordinance S-47309)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a land use
license agreement with Salt River Project Agriculture Improvement and Power District
(SRP) to maintain an existing art project, use and maintenance of parking spaces, park
benches and landscape. Further request the City Council to grant an exception
pursuant to Phoenix City Code § 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the documents
pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability provisions
that otherwise would be prohibited by Phoenix City Code § 42-18, as SRP's license
documents include such provisions. There is no financial impact to the City.

Summary
This license will replace existing license 131473 with SRP for Patrick Park Plaza which
was done as part of the City’s overall Southern Avenue Streetscape project, located at
30th Street and Old Southern Avenue. The project was funded through City of Phoenix
Percent-for-Art funds. The license fee is waived by SRP.

Contract Term
The term of the license will be 25 years, starting Feb. 1, 2021. Either party may
terminate the license upon delivery of a 30-day written notice.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Southern Avenue Streetscape Project in Patrick Park Plaza
License Agreement 131473 (Ordinance S-37757) on April 6, 2011.

Location
30th Street and Old Southern Avenue, a portion identified as assessor parcel number
122-68-034.
Council District: 8




Page 216

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters, the Office of Arts and
Culture, and the Finance Department.




Page 217



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Verint Audio Log System Upgrade and Professional Services - Requirements
Contract - EXC 21-042 (Ordinance S-47306)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Goserco, Inc. to purchase the Verint Audio Log System upgrade and professional
services for the Phoenix Fire Department. Further request authorization for the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The aggregate contract value will
not exceed $637,000.

Summary
The Phoenix Fire Regional Dispatch Center utilizes the Goserco Verint Audio Log
System to record all calls coming into both the dispatch sites at 150 S. 12th St. and
2425 W. Lower Buckeye Road. The dispatch sites are used to receive 9-1-1
emergency calls, dispatch fire and emergency medical services personnel, assign, and
monitor radio communications for the Phoenix Fire Department and their 28 regional
partners. The system plays a vital role in recording, logging, and storing all calls
received by both dispatch centers. The recordings are used for work review, public
records requests, and legal requirements. The current system is outdated and can no
longer be supported. The new system will serve as a critical public safety system that
requires a certified vendor to upgrade and provide continued support and patches.
Goserco is the current maintenance provider and is certified to perform work on the
Verint Audio Log System.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, normal competition was waived as
a result of an approved Determination Memo which stated the current Verint Audio Log
System hardware is not in compliance with the City’s information technology security
and will not support a server upgrade. If the system fails, the department will lose
critical data and information resulting in the department to be non-compliant for legal
and public records requests.




Page 218

The Deputy Finance Director recommends that the contract with Goserco, Inc. be
accepted.

Contract Term
The five-year contract term will begin on or about Feb. 17, 2021.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $637,000; funds are available in the Fire
Department's budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Jeff Barton and the Fire Department.




Page 219



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Hardware and Software for Exadata Cloud@Customer (Ordinance S-47295)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to approve expenditures
under the master agreement with Oracle America, Inc. to purchase software and one
year of hardware, maintenance and support for Exadata Cloud@Customer (ExaCC),
and to enter into all related software license and maintenance agreements in
accordance with the terms of the master agreement, in support of citywide Oracle
systems. Further request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to enter
into an agreement with Oracle Credit Corporation for payment for Exadata software,
maintenance and support. Aggregate contract costs will not exceed $2,569,000.
Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item.

Summary
The Information Technology Services Department is responsible for Citywide support
of Oracle databases for business applications throughout the City that reside on the
Oracle Engineered System, Exadata. These databases support multiple critical
business systems, including those for the Water Services and Public Works
departments. This system is comprised of two components, one of which was end-of-
life in June, 2020. The second component, which is currently hosting the remaining
business application databases, is scheduled to reach end-of-life in 2021. This request
is to replace the aging systems with a hardware and software solution that will utilize
the latest generation of Oracle Engineered Systems to deliver high-performance cloud-
like service capabilities.

Replacement of the Exadata systems with a subscription model will reduce the overall
operational cost by approximately $500,000 per year. Failure to replace the current
Exadata system could result in extensive business disruptions in the event of
equipment failure due to aging infrastructure and limited vendor support and
replacement parts.

Contract Term
Concurrently, a separate City Council authorization is requested to enter into a five-
year master service agreement with Oracle America, Inc., under which these
expenditures will be made. Annual ExaCC hardware, software, maintenance and


Page 220

support costs will continue annually, as long as it is in the City’s best interest.

Financial Impact
The costs of the Exadata implementation, software, and one year of hardware,
maintenance and support will not exceed $2,569,000. Approval of future annual
ongoing costs for hardware, software, maintenance and support will be brought to City
Council for payment authority at later dates. Funds are available in various
departments' budgets.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the Information
Technology Services Department.




Page 221



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Open Data Portal Hosting Annual Renewal (Ordinance S-47322)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to extend Contract 144640
with OpenGov, Inc. for the annual renewal of support and maintenance of the City's
Open Data portal, in an amount not to exceed $203,330. Further request authorization
for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Summary
The City of Phoenix utilizes OpenGov, Inc. for its Open Data Portal, which provides
transparent and easy-to-use data to residents and businesses regarding areas such as
public safety, transportation, finance, energy and sustainability, libraries, parks, and
arts and culture. The solution is a cloud-based platform that simplifies or eliminates on-
premise storage, infrastructure, indexing, retrieval, data management, and
presentation. Funding is for maintenance and support, technical assistance, hosting,
and performance dashboards. Failure to renew support and hosting for the portal
would result in the City no longer having an open data site for residents and
businesses who utilize the data for informational or data analytics purposes.

Contract Term
This contract was originally awarded for a one-year term on Feb. 1, 2017, with
approval of annual maintenance and support to continue annually, as long as it is in
the City's best interest. The City renews this contract annually, and this request is for
the fifth year, ending Feb. 28, 2022.

Financial Impact
With the $203,330 in additional funds, the contract's revised aggregate value is
approximately $954,147. Funds are available in the Information Technology Services
Department's operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the Information
Technology Services Department.




Page 222



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Oracle Master Agreement (Ordinance S-47326)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a master
agreement with Oracle America, Inc. (Oracle), setting out the terms and conditions for
future purchases, as needed, for products, services, software licensing, support and
maintenance for the City's applications, databases and computing hardware, and to
enter into all related software licenses, hardware and maintenance agreements in
accordance with the terms of the master agreement. Further request exemption from
the indemnification and liability provisions of section 42-18 of the City Code.

Summary
The City uses Oracle applications and technologies in multiple departments and they
are an integral part of the daily operations of the City. Oracle applications and
technologies are used in several critical Citywide systems, such as the Police
Department's Records Management System, the Customer Care and Billing system
used for water and solid waste billing, the Human Capital Management system used
for human resources and payroll functions, the Planning and Development
Department's permitting system, and the citywide Business Intelligence infrastructure.
These systems are critical to the City operations, as they bring in revenue from
permitting, water, and solid waste billing, and because they manage critical operations.

This master agreement is simply to agree upon the terms and conditions for
agreements, allowing for greater consistency and eliminating the need to negotiate
each license or agreement separately. Provisions in licenses and agreements under
this master agreement may be perpetual or extend beyond the term of the master
agreement, if deemed in the best interest of the City.

Procurement Information
The City's Oracle systems are procured individually at the time of their implementation.

Contract Term
This contract is for a five-year term beginning on or about Feb. 22, 2021.




Page 223

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to this master agreement. This request is only for
authorization to enter into a general product and services agreement with Oracle.
Request for City Council authorization for funding under this agreement will be sought
on an as-needed basis.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the Information
Technology Services Department.




Page 224



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Library Services and Technology Act Grant Application (Ordinance S-47319)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to apply for, accept and for the
City Controller to expend 2021 Library Services and Technology Act grant money up to
$50,000. The funds will be used to procure equipment in order to digitize historical
documents that are currently part of the Arizona Room at Burton Barr Central Library.
Further request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept and the City Controller to
disburse funds related to this item.

Summary
The purpose of the grant will be to procure professional scanning equipment in order
to digitize key Arizona Room collections which will make them available to more
customers through Phoenix Public Library website. The Arizona Room showcases the
history and culture of greater Phoenix, Arizona, and the Southwest. Many elements of
the Arizona Room's collections are invaluable for researchers, historians, architects,
preservationists, and the general public. This project would commence in June 2021
and conclude in August 2022.

The Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA) is the only federal program
exclusively for libraries. It is administered by the Institute of Museum and Library
Services. State libraries use the funds to support statewide initiatives and also
distribute the funds through sub-grants or cooperative agreements to public, school,
academic, research, and special libraries. Every fiscal year, Congress provides funding
for LSTA in the Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies
Appropriations bill. Federal resources help target library services to people of diverse
geographic, cultural, and socioeconomic backgrounds, to individuals with disabilities,
and to people with limited literacy skills.

Financial Impact
The amount of the grant (up to $50,000) will be expended in Fiscal Year 2021-22 and
as no matching funds are required, there is no impact to the General Fund.

Location
Burton Barr Central Library, 1221 N. Central Ave.
Council District: 7


Page 225


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Interim Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Library
Department.




Page 226



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Apply for Local Judicial Collection Enhancement Fund Grant to
Fund Municipal Court IT Position (Ordinance S-47315)

Request to authorize the Phoenix Municipal Court to apply for grant funding in an
amount not to exceed $430,000 from the Arizona Supreme Court-administered Judicial
Collection Enhancement Fund (JCEF) to fund a Lead User Technology Specialist
position for three years. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept, and
for the City Controller to disburse, all funds related to this item.

Summary
The Lead User Technology Specialist is a critical component to sustaining the Court’s
IT operations. This position is responsible for administration of a diverse portfolio of
mission-critical platforms, including Microsoft Windows Active Directory, the VMware
vSphere infrastructure, CommVault Simpana, For the Record and Qmatic. The position
is also responsible for managing and patching a fleet of over 400 computer
workstations, as well as ensuring that security patches are tested and applied in a
timely fashion, and remediation of any potential risks to the Court’s computer
environment.

Financial Impact
Funding will not exceed $430,000 over the three-year period. Funds will be made
available in the Phoenix Municipal Court local JCEF account. The Phoenix Municipal
Court must submit a funding plan and application to the Arizona Supreme Court
Administrative Office of the Courts to secure approval for use of JCEF funds pursuant
to Arizona Revised Statutes section 12-113. No General Fund dollars will be used.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Chief Presiding Judge B. Don Taylor and Deputy City
Manager Karen Peters.




Page 227



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Add Positions in Planning and Development Department to Meet Increased
Construction Activity (Ordinance S-47318)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to add 23 new positions to the
base staff level in the Planning and Development Department. No General Fund
dollars are requested to support this request; Development Services funds are
available.

Summary
Development activity continues to steadily increase in specific work group areas over
the past year and staffing has not maintained adequate levels to continue to meet
review turn-around times. The Planning and Development Department continues to
utilize innovation, efficiency improvements, technology and contract staff to meet the
increasing demands of our customers. There still remains a need to increase the base
level of staff to meet customer expectations. The requested positions are in areas of
the department that have been most impacted by the increase in construction activity,
specifically in development plan review and inspections. This targeted increase in staff
will help ensure that development activity is not negatively impacting development
customers/stakeholders. See Attachment A for the positions being requested.

Financial Impact
The estimated cost for the positions for the remainder of the FY 2020-21 is estimated
to be $605,867, and full year costs for FY 2021-22 are estimated to be $2,069,999. No
General Funds are requested to support this request; Development Services funds are
available.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 228
ATTACHMENT A – PDD FY 20-21 ADDITIONAL POSITIONS

POSITION NEED
Assistant Director (1) An additional Assistant Director Position is needed to
Planning & Development oversee the development of the TSMC campus and
supplier sites because of the scale, complexity, timing and
number of these project moving forward simultaneously
over the next few years. This new position will also allow
the current Assistant Director position to oversee existing
operations that have increased in number and complexity
over the last several years. There has been no increase in
executive level positions to oversee the almost doubling of
staff and increase number of projects.

Engineering Technician (2) To assist Electronic Plan Review (EPR) Triage Team with
Management Services- administration of the day-to-day operations of EPR,
Payments and Submittals including plan intake, processing, customer notification,
and payment. The team provides internal and external
technical support with the EPR Projectdox software
application, which includes staff and customer training.


Principal Engineering Technician (1) To lead and train EPR Triage team for Self-Certification
Management Services- project coordination and adequately staff EPR team.
Payments and Submittals Offsite work to install ramps, repair sidewalks, and install
driveways has now been added to the Self-Certified
submittals, requiring more coordination by the EPR Team
with the Site, Civil and Traffic for offsite plans/associated
permits.

Chief Engineering Technician *U7 (1) To provide enhanced supervision for the expanded EPR
Management Services- Triage Team. The combination of major shift to electronic
Payments and Submittals submittals with need to navigate between new and old
systems also results in significant quality control and
timeliness challenges.

Senior Engineering Tech (1) To assist EPR Triage Team with quality control. The
Management Services- combination of major shift to electronic submittals with the
Payments and Submittals need to navigate between multiple new and old systems
also results in significant quality control challenges.


Building Code Examiner (1) To assist with reducing turnaround times for Self-Certified
Plan Review- building plan submittals. The Minor Commercial team has
Commercial seen a significant increase in electronic plan submittals
and needs one Building Code Examiner for pre-log
reviews of minor commercial building plans.






Page 229
Senior Engineering Tech (1) To assist with commercial plan review of complex
Plan Review- construction projects. Commercial plan review activity
Commercial remains strong and the TSMC plant (the largest
development project in our history), will take the majority of
time for one of our four major commercial teams.

Engineering Technician (2) To assist residential plan review with the increase in
Plan Review- Single Family Residence plot plan submittals compared to
Residential last fiscal year. Additional staffing resources are needed to
reduce the turnaround times for these reviews and
maintain turnaround times in the future.

Senior Engineering Tech (1) To assist with residential plan review preparing and
Plan Review- processing plot plans, residential single-family standard
Residential plans, pools, gas lines, minor electrical and demo.

Electrical Plans Examiner II (1) To assist with electrical plan review and address the 90%
Plan Review- increase in photovoltaic submittals.
Residential
Electrical Inspector II (1) To address increase in Inspections due to the
Inspections- development of the TSMC site, in order to ensure
Commercial responsiveness to questions and speed of inspections.

Structural Inspector II (1) To address increase in Inspections due to the
Inspections- development of the TSMC site, in order to ensure
Commercial responsiveness to questions and speed of inspections.

Plumbing Mechanical Inspector II (1) To address increase in Inspections due to the
Inspections- development of the TSMC site, in order to ensure
Commercial responsiveness to questions and speed of inspections.

Fire Prevention Specialist II (1) To address increase in Inspections due to the
Inspections- development of the TSMC site, in order to ensure
Commercial responsiveness to questions and speed of inspections.

General Inspector II (2) To address need for increased residential inspections
Inspections- Over the last two Fiscal Years, Residential Inspections has
Residential completed 90,000 inspections. Plan submittal numbers are
up, and we need more staff to complete inspections.

Engineering Technician (1) To address increase in Non-Permitted Construction (NPC)
Inspections- cases, and the concurrent increase of civil citations and
Non-permitted Construction preparation of court documents.

Training Specialist (1) To adequately assist with on-boarding processes, New
Management Services- Employee Orientation, and coordination of technical
Human Resources training for Code Enforcement staff. Due to significant
growth in staff over the past few years, a single Curriculum
and Training Coordinator is unable to meet the training
and continuing education needs of the department.



Page 230
Landscape Architect I (1) To assist with landscape submittals and provide field
Planning- reviews on an as-needed basis, verify conditions of
Site Planning existing plant material and resolve construction conflicts.
This is required to achieve installation of required
landscape and trees that support the landscape
requirements and administration of Trails Masterplan
outside of city parks and preserves.

Planner II (1) To assist plan review team for “downtown, infill and light
Planning- rail corridor projects” and ensure projects assigned to
Site Planning teams receive site plan reviews, because of their
increased complexity and public involvement.

Administrative Assistant I (1) To support transition to a Web based service model and
Planning- oversee a variety of process improvements aimed at
Site Planning enhancing submittal, routing and review procedures.
Position will provide required administrative oversight and
support to public hearing processes assigned to the Site
Planning Team which includes Abandonment Hearing
Officer and Design Review Committee hearings.


TOTAL STAFF: 23






Page 231
ATTACHMENT B




Page 232




PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PERMIT/CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT
FORMAL CITY COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 17, 2021
FROM PAPER TO ELECTRONIC SUBMITTALS


EPR ELIGIBLE SUBMITTALS
FY 2020-2021

PAPER
21%
Plan Review activities have
Page 233 transitioned from
traditional paper reviews,
to the majority of plans
being submitted
electronically:
79% electronic vs
21% paper.

EPR
79%
EPR SELF-CERT TRIAGE




The EPR submittals from
January to November
Page 234
have increased 284%

Requesting to add to Payments
and Submittals: (1) Principal
Engineering Tech, (1) Chief
Engineering Tech, (1) Senior
Engineering Tech , and (2)
Engineering Techs
MINOR COMMERCIAL EPR LOAD


MINOR COMMERCIAL EPR LOAD
30.0%

25.0%


Page 235
20.0% There is a shift in the
process. It takes more
15.0% time to prelog plans
10.0%
electronically than it does
via paper
5.0%
Requesting to add to Plan
0.0% Review – Minor Commercial:
16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 (1) Building Code Examiner
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY PLOT PLANS SUBMITTED


RSF Plot Plans





Page 236
The Residential Section has seen a 49%
increase in Single Family Residence
plot plan submittals compared
200 to last fiscal year.


Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb March April May June
Requesting to add to Plan Review
- Residential: (2) Engineering
FY 17/18 FY 18/19 Series3 Technicians

Graphics Source: December 2020 New Log-in Trends Report
NEW SINGLE FAMILY (NSF) HOME PERMITS
FIRST 6 MONTHS OF THE FISCAL YEAR: JULY TO DECEMBER

New Single Family Home Permits
2,500


2,000

Page 237
1,500 The NSF numbers for
the first 6 months of the
1,000 Fiscal Year 20/21 are
trending up with 15%.


In support of the request to add
July-Dec.: 2016 July-Dec.: 2017 July-Dec.: 2018 July-Dec.: 2019 July-Dec.: 2020
to Plan Review - Residential:
New Single Family Home Permits First 6 Months of the Fiscal Year: July to December (2) Engineering Technicians
RESIDENTIAL PLAN REVIEWS


Residential Plan Reviews



The Residential Plan Review
160 Numbers FY20/21
Page 238 140

are trending higher than
100 previous years.




In support of the request to add
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb March April May June to Plan Review - Residential:
(2) Engineering Technicians
FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21


Graphics Source: December 2020 New Log-in Trends Report
RESIDENTIAL POOL PLOT PLANS SUBMITTED


Pool Plot Plans


The Residential Pool Plot Plans
are continuing to increase.
Page 239
Fiscal Year 18/19: 1,431
150 Fiscal Year 19/20: 1,548
100 Which is an 8% increase.
The 20/21 numbers
are trending up with 62%.
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb March April May June

Requesting to add to Plan Review -
FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20
Residential: (1) Senior Engineering Tech

Graphics Source: December 2020 New Log-in Trends Report
RESIDENTIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC SUBMITTALS



Residential Photovoltaic Submittals

12,000

Page 240 10,000 The PV numbers for
8,000 20/21 are up 90%,
forecasting trajectory of
6,000
10,047 by year end
4,000

2,000 Requesting to add to Plan
Review - Residential:
(1) Electrical Plans Examiner II
18/19 19/20 20/21
Residential Photovoltaic Submittals
COMMERCIAL BUILDING INSPECTIONS


Commercial Building Inspections
62,600
62,500
The Commercial
62,400 Inspections are
Page 241
62,300 trending up, and more
62,200 work will be coming in
62,100
62,000
due to the TSMC site.
61,900
61,800
61,700 Requesting to add to Inspections
61,600 Commercial:
17/18 18/19 19/20 (1) Electrical Inspector II
Commercial Inspections
(1) Structural Inspector II
(1) Plumbing Mechanical Inspector II
(1) Fire Prevention Specialist II
RESIDENTIAL INSPECTIONS



Residential Inspections
100,000 In each of the the last
90,000 two Fiscal Years,
Page 242 80,000 Residential Inspections
70,000 has completed 90,000
60,000 inspections. Plan
50,000 submittal numbers are up,
40,000 and we need more staff
30,000
to complete inspections.
20,000
10,000
0 Requesting to add to
16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20
Inspections Residential:
Residential Inspections (2) General Inspectors II
NON-PERMITTED CONSTRUCTION CASES



Non-Permitted Construction Cases
Since 2017, the
1,600
number of cases the
Page 243 1,400
Non-Permitted
1,200 Construction (NPC)
1,000 team has responded to
800 has significantly
increased.

Requesting to add to Non-
2017 2018 2019 2020 permitted Construction:
(1) Engineering Technician
SITE PLANNING – PRELIMINARY LOGIN


Preliminary Log-ins




Page 244
The preliminary logins
numbers, continue to
increase.



Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Requesting to add:
Landscape Architect I, Planner II
FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21
and Administrative Assistant I
SITE PLANNING – BACK LOG

Site Planning - Back Log Cases

In addition to the
400 increase in preliminary
Page 245 submittals. Site Planning
300 is also at the highest
level of work with 507
plans in the system and
40% not meeting the
turnaround goal
12/7/2020 12/14/2020 12/21/2020 12/28/2020
In support of the request to
Site Planning
add: Landscape Architect I,
Planner II and Administrative
Back Log Percentage: 40% 45% 45% 45%
Assistant I



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend Contract for Home Delivered Meals (Ordinance S-47312)

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to amend contract
152984 with Area Agency on Aging, Region One, Inc. (AAA) to accept additional home
-delivered meal funding in the amount of $500,000 for a new contract total of
$5,425,370. The term of this contract is from July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021.
Further request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller
to disburse, all funds related to this item. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Summary
Funds provided to the City of Phoenix through AAA are used to fund the City’s Home
Delivered Meal (HDM) program. The HDM program assists with increasing the nutrient
intake of older adults at nutrition risk to allow them to remain independent in their
homes.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, service needs have increased as more seniors have
become homebound. With the additional funding, the Human Services Department is
projected to prepare and deliver approximately 52,137 additional nutritionally balanced
meals to homebound seniors, bringing the overall projected number of meals served
during the term of the contract to 585,717 meals.

Contract Term
This term of the contract is for one year from July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021, with
three remaining one-year options to extend. Any extension option may be exercised by
the City Manager or his designee.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of this contract shall not exceed $5,425,370. There is no match
requirement for the additional funding. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
On May 16, 2018, City Council authorized staff to contract with Selrico Services, Inc.
for food management of the Senior Congregate and HDM Programs with Ordinance S-
44610. Selrico Services produces and delivers meals according to the specified AAA
standards for the HDM program. The contract term for Selrico is July 1, 2018 through


Page 246

June 30, 2023.

On April 3, 2019, City Council authorized staff to enter into contract with AAA, the City
Treasurer to accept and City Controller to disburse funds with Ordinance S-45521.

On Nov. 18, 2020, City Council authorized staff to accept an additional $2,843,045
from AAA, the City Treasurer to accept and City Controller to disburse funds.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Human
Services Department.




Page 247



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend Contract for Senior Nutrition Meal Program (Ordinance S-47313)

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Contract
147513 with Selrico Services, Inc. to increase the contract amount by $500,000 to
provide additional home-delivered meals to vulnerable seniors impacted by COVID-19.
The new total contract amount will not exceed $31,443,045. The current term of the
contract from July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2023, remains unchanged, however this
additional funding must be expended by June 30, 2021. Further request authorization
for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. Funding is provided by
the Area Agency on Aging, Region One, Inc. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Summary
Selrico Services, Inc. provides home-delivered meals (HDM) services to homebound
and disabled seniors who live in Phoenix as specified by the Area Agency on Aging,
Region One, Inc. (AAA) standards for the HDM program. The AAA funding and
standards are outlined in Contract 152984. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the
AAA has expanded the qualifications for HDM recipients, resulting in an increase of
residents who qualify for meals. To address the need created by the COVID-19
pandemic, Selrico Services under its existing contract, will prepare and deliver
additional meals to meet the needs of qualifying recipients.

Contract Term
The term of the contract is from July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2023, with one, two-
year option to extend, for a total contract term of seven years.

Financial Impact
The new contract total shall not exceed $31,443,045. Expenditures for the term July 1,
2020 through June 30, 2021 shall not to exceed $6,819,450. There is no impact to the
General Fund. Funding is provided from AAA.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
On May 16, 2018, City Council authorized staff to contract with Selrico Services, Inc.
for food management of the Senior Congregate and HDM Programs with Ordinance S-
44610.



Page 248

On April 3, 2019, City Council authorized staff to enter into contract with AAA, the City
Treasurer to accept and City Controller to disburse funds with Ordinance S-45521.

On May 14, 2020, City Council approved the COVID-19 Food Assistance Plan.

On June 3, 2020, City Council approved $300,000 in additional funds to be added to
the Selrico contract with Ordinance S-46709.

On Nov. 18, 2020, City Council authorized an amendment to the AAA contract to
accept $2,843,045 in additional funding and for the City Treasurer to accept and City
Controller to disburse funds.

On Jan. 6, 2021, City Council approved $2,843,045 in additional funds to be added to
the Selrico contract with Ordinance S-47210.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Human
Services Department.




Page 249



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Agreement Between State of Arizona and City of Phoenix for Maintenance and
Operation of Margaret T. Hance Park (Ordinance S-47314)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the State of Arizona Department of
Transportation (ADOT) to establish maintenance and operational responsibilities for
the City and ADOT, for Margaret T. Hance Park and the I-10 Deck Park Tunnel.

Summary
In 1988, the City and ADOT entered into an IGA for the “Deck at Central Avenue.” The
agreement outlined the responsibilities regarding construction of the deck/tunnel,
development of a park on the structural deck and development of a bus transit terminal
integral with the deck. The IGA also outlined responsibilities of costs for the overall
project.

Margaret T. Hance Park (Hance Park) opened to the public in 1992, over the
completed I-10 deck tunnel. Today, 250,000 vehicles drive daily under Hance Park,
which has become a downtown destination and oasis of green, open space.

In 2016, the Parks and Recreation Board approved the Margaret T. Hance Park Master
Site Plan. In October 2017, a Notice to Proceed was issued to HargreavesJones, a
landscape architecture firm, to begin the design for the redevelopment of Hance Park,
estimated to cost a total of $100 million.

On Dec. 15, 2020, Phase IA, consisting of the Fiesta Bowl PLAY at Hance Park, a
partial escarpment and surrounding landscape opened to the public.

Now, 33 years after the 1988 IGA, this new IGA (Attachment A) will address
maintenance and operational issues of a fully completed transportation facility with an
iconic downtown park above it.

Contract Term
The new IGA is automatically renewing for successive five-year terms from the
effective date and may be amended upon mutual written consent of both parties. The
IGA may be cancelled at any time, with 90 days written notice.


Page 250


Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the approval of this IGA. Both parties will continue to
fund the maintenance, operations, and any improvements to their respective facilities
as outlined in the IGA.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
IGA between ADOT and the City for the Deck at Central Avenue on Feb. 4, 1988
(Agreement 47353).

IGA between State of Arizona and the City for Margaret T. Hance Park Joint Repair
Project on Jan. 8, 2020 (Ordinance S-46304).

Location
Margaret T. Hance Park, 67 W. Culver St.
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Parks and
Recreation Department.




Page 251
ATTACHMENT A

ADOT CAR No.: IGA 19-0007558-I
AG Contract No.: P001 2019 003572
Project Location/Name: I-10 Deck Park
Tunnel, Hance Park
Type of Work: Maintenance
Federal-aid No.: NA
ADOT Project No.: F0293 01C
TIP/STIP No.: NA
CFDA No.: 20.205 - Highway Planning and
Construction
Budget Source Item No.:


INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT

BETWEEN
THE STATE OF ARIZONA
AND
CITY OF PHOENIX


THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this date ________________________________, pursuant to the Arizona
Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) §§ 11-951 through 11-954, as amended, between the STATE OF
ARIZONA, acting by and through its DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (the “State” or “ADOT”)
and the CITY OF PHOENIX, acting by and through its MAYOR and CITY COUNCIL (the “City”). The
State and the City are collectively referred to as “Parties.”


I. RECITALS

1. The State is empowered by A.R.S. § 28-401 to enter into this Agreement and has delegated
to the undersigned the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the State.

2. The City is empowered by A.R.S. § 48-572 to enter into this Agreement and has by
ordinance, a copy of which is attached and made a part hereof, authorized the City to enter
into this Agreement and has authorized the undersigned to execute this Agreement on
behalf of the City.

3. The City is making improvements to Margaret T. Hance Park above the Interstate 10 (I-10)
Deck Park Tunnel, (the “Project” or “Hance Park”). The Project includes, but is not limited
to, reconstruction and construction of planters, landscaping, irrigation, sidewalks,
pathways, shade structures, garden, playground areas, tree bosque, stage/amphitheater,
restrooms, food and beverage structures, and water features. This Agreement will establish
maintenance and operational responsibilities of Hance Park and the I-10 Deck Park Tunnel.

4. The Project’s boundaries are delineated in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated herein to
this Agreement.

5. In conjunction with the Project, the City will administer construction of necessary joint
repair work above the tunnel, funding and joint repair work details are addressed in IGA
19-0007557-I.



Page 252
IGA 19-0007558-I


6. This Agreement does not cancel or supersede any existing agreements but will take
precedence in the event any questions arise pertaining to maintenance responsibilities.

THEREFORE, the Recitals set forth above are incorporated into this Agreement and in
consideration of the mutual terms expressed herein, it is agreed as follows:



II. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

1. The Parties agree:

a. The Project will be performed, completed, accepted and paid for in accordance with the
approved requirements of the Project plans and specifications.

b. The City will temporarily convert certain areas to turf grass within the Project area. The
City will continue to maintain the turf grass until commencement of Phase 1 of the
Project, at which time the turf grass will be removed and the final intended
improvements will be installed.

2. The State will:

a. Issue, in accordance with the established procedures of the State’s Central District
Permit Office, a permit for the initial construction of the Project and separate permits
for related pre-construction activities (such as pot-holing, utility work, survey etc.).
Permits will be issued when appropriate insurance documents are provided as required
by ADOT Risk Management.

b. Review the design documents required for construction of the Project and provide
comments to the City.

c. Participate in design and construction meetings as required. Coordinate with the City
regarding the construction schedules of all State projects that affect this Project. Within
available resources, operate State facilities in a manner that minimizes negative impacts
to the City.

d. Not incur any costs for the Project, either foreseen or unforeseen.

3. The City will:

a. Submit an encroachment permit application with all required documentation to the
State’s Central District Permit Office for the initial construction of the Project, and
separate encroachment permit applications for related pre-construction activities as
needed. Provide appropriate insurance with each encroachment permit. Submit an
encroachment permit application for any new construction or installation.

b. Prepare and provide the design plans, specifications and other such documents and
services required for the construction bidding and construction of the Project and
incorporate comments from the State as appropriate.



Page 253
IGA 19-0007558-I



c. Coordinate with the State to address any potential temporary or permanent impacts to
the State’s drainage system, catch basins, culverts, etc., related to the City’s Project. Be
responsible for any/all Project related modifications and/or construction elements
within the State’s right of way to accommodate the City’s Project, including any/all
related costs to the State.

d. Minimize moisture or drainage intrusion into the underlying infrastructure for
supporting I-10 Deck Park Tunnel by installing flow sensors on the irrigation system
that monitor anticipated flow and soil sensors to monitor the moisture content of the
soil as part of the Project surface improvements. If excess flow is detected, shut off the
water supply until any potential leaks are identified and corrected, if the soil moisture
content is too high, adjust the irrigation system to reduce the amount of irrigation being
used.

e. Conduct coordination, design and construction progress meetings as required.
Coordinate with the State, or its representatives, relative to the construction schedule of
the Project.

f. Be responsible for all Project costs.

g. After completion of all phases of the Project, accept the Project as complete and in
accordance with the Project’s Contract Documents. Coordinate a final inspection
meeting regarding the improvements with State representatives to assure that the
constructed improvements function properly.


III. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

1. The Parties understand and agree:

a. The City is responsible for maintenance of Hance Park and the State is responsible for
the structural integrity and maintenance of the I-10 Deck Park Tunnel.

b. The State is the owner and controls property rights and interests of the I-10 and the I-
10 Deck Park Tunnel used by the City and hereby allows the City to manage, maintain,
program, and operate Hance Park through a State issued encroachment permit.

c. The City will be responsible for all City signage and the State will be responsible for all
State signage.

d. Where the sound/screen walls delineate the areas between jurisdictional
responsibilities, both Parties will maintain the surface of the wall facing each Party’s
area of maintenance responsibility, which will include graffiti removal, painting and
minor surface repair.

e. The City will be responsible for any and all homeless encampment cleanup within the
park boundaries, in accordance with the City’s Park Policy.





Page 254
IGA 19-0007558-I


f. The City will preserve access points at all four I-10 Deck Park Tunnel vent shafts and
underneath the Central Avenue Bridge for ADOT, its agents and/or contractors. The
locations at all four I-10 Deck Park Tunnel vent shafts will be used to access equipment
that needs to be maintained on a periodic basis and some maintenance may require
multiple vehicles. The location underneath the Central Avenue Bridge is the main point
of delivery for the 12 kilovolt (KV) service that provides power to the tunnel for both
the freeway lighting and the eight vent fans. Ensure access points can support and
accommodate multiple fleet size vehicles and truck/trailer access for large equipment
replacements.

g. If through installation, use, or routine maintenance, the property of either the City or the
State in the area referenced by this Agreement is disturbed or damaged, the Party
responsible will, at its own expense, and in a manner acceptable to the owner, restore or
repair the facility in as good a condition as before such damage or disturbance. If such
restoration, repair, or replacement is not completed within a sufficient time, or such
repair or replacement does not meet the owners duly adopted standards, the owner
shall have the right to perform the necessary restoration, repair, or replacement, either
through its own forces or through a hired contractor after the owner has communicated
with the other Party. The non-compliant Party shall reimburse the owner for its
expenses within 30 days of receipt of an invoice.

h. The State will coordinate with the City to address any potential temporary or
permanent impacts to Hance Park infrastructure and operation due to any I-10 Deck
Park Tunnel related structural repairs or major maintenance activities. In these cases,
the City will restore Hance Park features disturbed to pre-situational conditions. The
State may participate in a portion of the restoration costs as ultimately determined
through the Issue Escalation Ladder, as shown in Table 1, Section IV below.

i. Should any future water intrusion result from Hance Park, the City will be solely
responsible for costs to cure damages to facilities.

j. All lease agreements will be addressed separately through the ADOT Right of Way
Group, Property Management Section.

2. The State will:

a. Issue, in accordance with the established procedures of the State’s Central District
Permit Office, a permit on a yearly basis for routine maintenance and emergency work.
Routine maintenance and emergency work will be defined within the permit. Permits
will be issued when appropriate insurance documents are provided as required by
ADOT Risk Management.

b. Coordinate and communicate with the City at least 30 days in advance with all State
infrastructure repairs and renovations to minimize Hance Park operation disruptions,
except in emergencies.

c. Coordinate with and notify the City of maintenance activities scheduled to occur at any
of the four I-10 Deck Park Tunnel vent shafts or underneath the Central Avenue Bridge.
ADOT will require daily access under the Central Avenue Bridge to access the tunnel




Page 255
IGA 19-0007558-I


control room. Although large maintenance activities are infrequent, if step down
transformers or electrical switch gear require repair or replacement, ADOT will use the
access point under the Central Avenue Bridge. Certain maintenance activities may
require this location to support the parking of multiple fleet size vehicles and
truck/trailer access for large equipment replacements. Emergency work will not
require coordination, however the State will notify the City of emergency conditions
that may affect operations or public safety.

d. Excluding any and all emergency maintenance work, defer to the City interactions with
the City’s facilities and their non-profit occupants on or near the Project for matters of
Hance Park operation, improvement, or renovation.

e. Maintain all storm drain siphons within State highway rights of way within Hance Park,
of which the State is the primary user.

f. Maintain the structural integrity of existing and future sound/screen walls constructed
within the State’s rights of way.

3. The City will:

a. Submit an encroachment permit application with all required documentation to the
State’s Central District Permit Office for routine maintenance and emergency work.
Provide appropriate insurance for the encroachment permit once, then annually for the
maintenance and emergency work, to keep that permit valid. Notify the State’s Central
District Permit Office of any emergency maintenance work affecting the State right of
way immediately. Submit an encroachment permit application for any new construction
or installation.

b. Maintain sidewalks, pathways, ADA ramps, pedestrian underpasses, restrooms, shade
structures, any equipment, and drainage features feeding into the State’s drainage
system to City maintenance standards unless State maintenance standards take
precedence. Maintenance of the defined areas will include routine maintenance
activities, including but not limited to: sweeping, crack sealing, removal of spills, graffiti
removal, litter and trash removal, repair of the surface/base of damaged pavement
presenting a safety hazard, cracking and/or buckling of sidewalk, and weed control.

c. Maintain Hance Park parking lots and driveways, routine maintenance activities include
but are not limited to: sweeping, crack sealing, removal of spills, graffiti removal, repair
of pot-holes, routine maintenance of signing and striping, leveling and/or patching of
asphalt concrete pavement with premix, pavement markings, seal coating and/or flush
coating of oxidized pavement, litter and trash removal, repair of the surface/base of
damaged pavement presenting a safety hazard, and weed control.

d. Provide landscape maintenance in accordance with accepted horticultural practices,
keeping all areas free of weeds, undesirable grasses, and litter, applying irrigation
water, furnishing and applying insecticide/herbicide sprays and dust to combat
diseases and other pests, pruning, and replanting, as required to maintain the
landscaping and the irrigation installed as part of the Project, including all testing,





Page 256
IGA 19-0007558-I


adjusting, repairing, and operation of the irrigation system, and shall furnish all
electrical power and water to operate the irrigation system, at its sole expense.

e. Perform routine maintenance of drainage basins and catch basins (including vector
control), consistent with the City maintenance and operations levels within the Project
limits.

f. Coordinate with the State to address any potential temporary or permanent impacts to
the State’s drainage system, catch basins, culverts, etc., related to any/all new
construction by the City. Be responsible for any/all new construction related
modifications and/or construction elements within the State’s right of way to
accommodate the City’s new construction, including any/all related costs to the State.

g. Operate, monitor, and maintain Hance Park surface improvements to minimize
moisture or drainage intrusion into the underlying infrastructure for supporting I-10
Deck Park Tunnel. If excess flow is detected, shut off the water supply until any
potential leaks are identified and corrected, if the soil moisture content is too high,
adjust the irrigation system to reduce the amount of irrigation being used.

h. Maintain, operate, and pay all Hance Park utilities (electric, water, sewer, etc.)
associated with, and not limited to landscape, buildings, and lighting within Hance Park.

i. Program and operate Hance Park for the recreational enjoyment of park users including
but not limited to allowing large and small public events, passive and active play, health
and wellness programs, public art installations and exhibits, and a variety of
recreational, cultural, and/or education programs and events within the Hance Park
boundaries; obtaining all required permits from the State. The City will police its
allowed activities above to assure no damage is done to the underlying structure(s).

IV. ISSUE RESOLUTION

1. Any dispute regarding the interpretation of any provision of this Agreement, shall be
resolved using the following escalation ladder, to attempt to resolve all disputes at the
lowest possible level. The levels of resolution, lowest to highest are as follows:

Table 1
Issue Escalation Ladder
Level State Representative City Representative
First Engineering Downtown Deputy Director
Administrator
Second Senior Division Parks and Recreation Director
Administrator
Highest Level IDO Director Assistant to the City Manager – Street
Transportation Department

2. If the dispute is not resolved, it then will advance to arbitration per A.R.S. § 12-1518, as
applicable.






Page 257
IGA 19-0007558-I



V. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

1. This Agreement shall become effective upon signing and dating of the Determination Letter
by the State’s Attorney General.

2. Any change or modification to the Project will only occur with the mutual written consent of
both Parties.

3. This Agreement is automatically renewing, for successive periods of five-year terms, from
the effective date, and may be amended upon mutual written consent of both Parties,
provided however, that this Agreement may be cancelled at any time, with 90 days written
notice. If the City initiates a cancellation of this Agreement, the State is not obligated to
complete the Project or maintain Hance Park and may require that a portion or the entire
park be removed at the City’s sole expense.

4. The City shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the State, any of its departments,
agencies, officers or employees (collectively referred to in this paragraph as the “State”)
from any and all claims, demands, suits, actions, proceedings, loss, cost and damages of
every kind and description, including reasonable attorneys' fees and/or litigation expenses
(collectively referred to in this paragraph as the “Claims”), which may be brought or made
against or incurred by the State on account of loss of or damage to any property or for
injuries to or death of any person, to the extent caused by, arising out of, or contributed to,
by reasons of any alleged act, omission, professional error, fault, mistake, or negligence of
the City, its employees, officers, directors, agents, representatives, or contractors, their
employees, agents, or representatives in connection with or incident to the performance of
this Agreement. The City’s obligations under this paragraph shall not extend to any Claims
to the extent caused by the negligence of the State, except the obligation does apply to any
negligence of the City which may be legally imputed to the State by virtue of the State’s
ownership or possession of land. The City’s obligations under this paragraph shall survive
the termination of this Agreement.

5. The City shall require its contractors to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the State,
from any and all claims, demands, suits, actions, proceedings, loss, cost and damages of
every kind and description, including any attorneys’ fees and/or litigation expenses,
which may be brought or made against or incurred by the State on account of loss of or
damage to any property or for injuries to or death of any person, to the extent caused
by, arising out of, or contributed to, by reasons of any alleged act, omission,
professional error, fault, mistake, or negligence of the contractor, its employees, agents,
representatives, or subcontractors, their employees, agents, or representatives in
connection with or incident to the performance of the work, or arising out of
Workmen’s Compensation claims, Unemployment Compensation claims, or
Unemployment Disability Compensation claims of employees of the contractor and/or
its subcontractors or claims under similar such laws or obligations. The contractor’s
obligation under this subsection shall not extend to any liability to the extent caused by
the negligence of the State, or its employees, except the obligation does apply to any
negligence of the contractor which may be legally imputed to the State by virtue of its
ownership or possession of land.





Page 258
IGA 19-0007558-I


6. The Parties warrant compliance with the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency
Act of 2006 and associated 2008 Amendments (the "Act"). Additionally, in a timely manner,
the City shall provide information that is requested by the State to enable the State to
comply with the requirements of the Act, as may be applicable.

7. The Parties acknowledge and will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act Of 1964.

8. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with Arizona laws.

9. This Agreement may be cancelled in accordance with A.R.S. § 38-511.

10. The City shall retain all books, accounts, reports, files and other records relating to the
Agreement for five years after completion of the Project. These documents shall be subject
at all reasonable times to inspection and audit by the State. Such records shall be produced
by the City at the request of ADOT.

11. This Agreement is subject to all applicable provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act
(Public Law 101-336, 42 U.S.C. 12101-12213) and all applicable Federal regulations under
the Act, including 28 CFR Parts 35 and 36. The Parties to this Agreement shall comply with
Executive Order Number 2009-09 issued by the Governor of the State of Arizona and
incorporated by reference regarding “Non-Discrimination.”

12. Non-Availability of Funds: Every obligation of the Parties under this Agreement is
conditioned upon the availability of funds appropriated or allocated for the fulfillment of
such obligations. If funds are not allocated and available for the continuance of this
Agreement, this Agreement may be terminated by either Party at the end of the period for
which the funds are available. No liability shall accrue to the Parties in the event this
provision is exercised, and the Parties shall not be obligated or liable for any future
payments as a result of termination under this paragraph.

13. The Parties shall comply with the applicable requirements of A.R.S. § 41-4401.

14. The Parties shall certify that all contractors comply with the applicable requirements of
A.R.S. §35-393.01.

15. The Parties shall comply with all applicable laws, rules, regulations and ordinances, as may
be amended.

16. All notices or demands upon any Party to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be
delivered electronically, in person, or sent by mail, addressed as follows:

For Agreement Administration: City of Phoenix
Arizona Department of Transportation Parks and Recreation Department
Joint Project Agreement Section Attn: Cynthia Aguilar, Acting
205 S. 17th Avenue, Mail Drop 637E Parks and Recreation Director
Phoenix, AZ 85007 200 W. Washington Street, 16th Fl
JPABranch@azdot.gov Phoenix, AZ 85003
602.495-5225
Cynthia.Aguilar@phoenix.gov




Page 259
IGA 19-0007558-I




For Project Administration:
Arizona Department of Transportation City of Phoenix
Central Maintenance District Office of the City Engineer
2140 W. Hilton, MD E700 Attn: Jarod Rogers, Principal
Phoenix, AZ 85009 Landscape Architect/Project
602.712.6664 Manager
602.712.3116 FAX 200 W. Washington Street, 5th Fl
Phoenix, AZ 85003
602.534.2160
Jarod.Rogers@phoenix.gov

For Maintenance Related Issues:
Arizona Department of Transportation City of Phoenix
Central Maintenance District Parks and Recreation Department
Maintenance Engineer Attn: Cynthia Aguilar, Acting
2140 West Hilton Avenue, Mail Drop Parks and Recreation Director
PM00 200 W. Washington Street, 16th Fl
Phoenix, Arizona 85009 Phoenix, AZ 85003
602.712.6664 602.495-5225
602.712.6983 FAX Cynthia.Aguilar@phoenix.gov

For Emergency Related Issues:
Arizona Department of Transportation
Traffic Operations Center
2302 W. Durango
Phoenix, AZ 85009
602.712.6591, M-F, 8:00 am to 5:00 pm
602.257.1563, outside regular business
hours

17. Any revisions to the names and addresses above may be updated administratively by either
Party and shall be in writing.

18. In accordance with A.R.S. § 11-952 (D), attached and incorporated in this Agreement is the
written determination of each Party’s legal counsel that the Parties are authorized under
the laws of this State to enter into this Agreement and that the Agreement is in proper form.






Page 260
IGA 19-0007558-I


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first above
written.

CITY OF PHOENIX STATE OF ARIZONA
ED ZUERCHER, City Manager Department of Transportation


By ______________________________ By ______________________________
CYNTHIA AGUILAR STEVE BOSCHEN, PE
Acting Parks and Recreation Director Division Director

ATTEST:


By ______________________________
DENISE ARCHIBALD
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:


By ______________________________
Acting City Attorney






Page 261



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Enter into Development Agreement with PV RE Devco LLC for
Installation of Public Infrastructure and Public Space Improvements (Ordinance
S-47323)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to negotiate and enter into a
development agreement and any other agreements as necessary (Agreements), with
PV RE Devco LLC, or its City-approved designee (Developer), for the installation of
public infrastructure and outdoor public space improvements, and the dedication of
public right-of-way or easements. Further request authorization for the City Controller
to disburse funds under the terms of the Agreements.

Summary
The City has been informed that the Developer has secured the rights to purchase
from the existing owners, portions of the nearly 100-acre Paradise Valley Mall property
generally located from 4500-4610 E. Cactus Road (Site) and intends to redevelop the
Site, into a mixed-use, amenity rich destination (Project). To facilitate this
redevelopment, the Developer will make several public infrastructure improvements,
creating new public access through the Site, and facilitating pedestrian connectivity
and activity.

Subject to City Council approval, the following major business terms have been
negotiated with the Developer and would be implemented through the Agreements:

· Developer will privately finance and construct the enhanced public infrastructure
improvements.
· Developer will install and construct a public east-west street (including landscaping
and appurtenant amenities) for public access through the Project at approximately
the location of East Larkspur Drive and convey such access to the City in a
mechanism approved by the City.
· As the Project plans develop, and at Developer’s discretion, the Developer may
install and construct an additional public east-west street (including landscaping and
appurtenant amenities) for public access through the Project at a location selected
by Developer, and convey such access to the City in a mechanism approved by the
City.



Page 262

· As the Project plans develop and at Developer’s discretion, Developer may install
and construct one or more public north-south streets (including landscaping and
appurtenant amenities) for public access through the Project at locations selected
by Developer, and convey such access to the City in a mechanism approved by the
City.
· Developer will design and construct a public park/trail/bike path component through
the Project including new landscaping, enhanced shading, decorative paving, new
community gathering spaces and water features, which exceed what is required by
City Code.
· Developer will install additional enhanced landscaping, enhanced pedestrian
improvements, decorative construction features, site furnishings, shade structures
and other enhanced improvements which are beyond what may be required by any
City codes, plans or ordinances, and as agreed upon by the City and Developer.
· The Agreements may include other such public infrastructure and related
components (and costs thereof) as approved by the City of Phoenix Community and
Economic Development Director.
· These improvements shall be in conformance with the zoning for the Site.
· Developer must comply with Title 34 of the Arizona Revised Statutes in constructing
the improvements to qualify for reimbursement, and the specifics and cost of the
public infrastructure improvements must be pre-approved by the City in order to
qualify for reimbursement.
· The City will reimburse the Developer for public infrastructure improvements as
listed above in the following manner:
a. Years 1-7: 100 percent of the City of Phoenix portion of the eligible transaction
privilege tax (TPT) revenue generated from new development activity at the Site,
including construction sales tax.
b. Years 8-25: (1) 50 percent of the City of Phoenix portion of eligible TPT revenue
generated from new development activity at the Site, and (2) 50 percent of the
increase in the City of Phoenix portion of eligible TPT revenue generated at the Site
from existing tenants as of the construction commencement date for the first phase
of the public infrastructure improvements, based on the TPT revenue levels at the
Site from operations as of Dec. 31, 2019.
c. Reimbursement shall not exceed actual verifiable costs for the approved public
infrastructure improvements.
d. Reimbursement would not begin until after the Developer completed the first phase
of public infrastructure improvements at the Site and the City accepted those
improvements. Reimbursements would be made quarterly, in arrears, with
additional details to be specified in the Agreements.
· No other sources of funds would be used if the above resources are not adequate
to meet the projected construction expense.


Page 263

· The Agreements will include other terms and conditions as deemed necessary by
the City.

The redevelopment of Paradise Valley Mall is an important economic development
opportunity that will create several thousand new jobs over time for the community,
and will yield significant financial and public benefits for the City of Phoenix, above and
beyond the TPT revenue generated. This property is the village core for Paradise
Valley and redevelopment of it in more intense mixed-use development pattern is
supported by numerous goals in the Phoenix General Plan.

Contract Term
The development agreement will be for a term of 25 years.

Financial Impact
The City’s financial impact will be the reimbursement of eligible City of Phoenix new
TPT revenue generated from the Site. This includes 100 percent of the TPT revenue
generated from new development activity in years 1-7; 50 percent of the new TPT
revenue generated at the Site from new development activity in years 8-25; and 50
percent of the increase in TPT revenue generated at the Site from existing tenants
(above and beyond levels from operations as of Dec. 31, 2019) in years 8-25.
Financial terms of the Agreements will be reviewed by the Budget and Research
Department to verify funding availability prior to execution.

Location
Generally located at 4500-4610 E. Cactus Road
Council District: 3

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Interim Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Community
and Economic Development Department.




Page 264



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Conduct Direct Negotiations for Disposition of City-Owned
Land and Improvements Located at 1 S. 24th St. (Ordinance S-47329)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to identify a buyer and
negotiate for the direct sale of the former First National Bank of Arizona building
located at 1 S. 24th St. Further request to authorize placement of a 30-year declaration
of restrictive covenants on the property prior to any sale and/or make the sale
conditioned on a 30-year conservation easement. There is no impact to the General
Fund with this action.

Summary
The City's Aviation Department owns Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 121-62-041A,
located at 1 S. 24th St. (Site). The Site is approximately 1.55 acres and includes the
former First National Bank of Arizona Building (Building), currently vacant. The
Building, approximately 5,460 square feet, was originally designed by Kenneth Oberg,
built in 1966, and is eligible for historic designation.

On June 20, 2018, City Council authorized the Community and Economic
Development Department (CEDD) to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the sale
and adaptive reuse of the land and improvements, and on Sept. 17, 2018, the RFP
was issued.

On Dec. 16, 2018, a fire incident occurred in the Building resulting in damage to the
Building’s interior and roof. This incident occurred before the RFP process could be
completed. Key dates and actions that followed, include:

· January 2019 - RFP-CED18-FNB canceled with intent to reissue;
· June 2019 - Fire Damage Investigation and Final Report completed; and
· May 2020 - Building Conditions Assessment and Report completed.

On Oct. 30, 2020, RFP-CED18-FNB was canceled with no intent to reissue due to
changes in the Site’s condition as a result of the fire damage. Staff now recommends
conducting direct negotiations for the sale of the Site.




Page 265

With City Council approval, CEDD will advertise the Site for sale at the appraised
value of $480,000 and in “as-is” condition. Interested parties will also be notified of the
30-year declaration of restrictive covenants on the property and/or that the sale is
subject to a 30-year conservation easement. Following negotiations with the
recommended buyer, business terms will be presented to the City Council for approval
prior to entering into an agreement.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the General Fund with this action.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Downtown, Aviation, Economy and Innovation Subcommittee recommended
issuance of an RFP for the sale and adaptive reuse of the real property and
improvements for approval on June 6, 2018, by a vote of 4-0.

The City Council authorized issuance of an RFP for the sale and adaptive reuse of the
real property and improvements on June 20, 2018.

Public Outreach
Staff presented to the Central City Village Planning Committee on May 14, 2018 and to
the Historic Preservation Commission on May 21, 2018 and Feb. 8, 2021.

Location
1 S. 24th St.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Interim Deputy City Manager John Chan, Deputy City
Manager Mario Paniagua, and the Aviation and Community and Economic
Development departments.




Page 266



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Additional Expenditures for Marketing Services - ADSPO16-145339 (Ordinance S
-47321)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 149535 with RIESTER Sonoran, LLC for the purchase of
interactive marketing services for the Community and Economic Development (CED)
Department. Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $50,000.

Summary
This contract provides interactive marketing services including website design,
advertising and public relations services for the City. Additional funds are needed to
allow CED to produce two videos that will showcase the diverse economy of Phoenix
with a special focus on the unprecedented growth of Phoenix’s bioscience industry
throughout the community and on the Phoenix Biomedical Campus.

This effort will serve to dynamically communicate via multi-media platforms to two key
audiences for business attraction: industry executives and skilled talent on local,
national and international levels. The videos will visually complement the CED website
redesign, be posted on both the CED and Phoenix Biomedical Campus websites and
elevate the visibility of Phoenix at the annual BIO International Digital Convention,
occurring virtually in June 2021. Technology has greatly changed the way the public
accesses information as it evaluates a city for relocation and expansion. The videos
will provide the 10,000+ anticipated attendees at the 2021 BIO Digital Convention the
opportunity to quickly see the advantages of being a part of Phoenix’s vibrant,
welcoming, collaborative ecosystem of growing advanced industries, opportunities and
quality of life. The departments currently utilizing this contract include CED and the
Office of Government Relations.

Contract Term
The contract term is March 21, 2019 through March 20, 2024.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $50,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $3,380,000. Funding for the two videos is available in the


Page 267


Downtown Community Reinvestment Fund and Genomic Facilities and Operations
Fund.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This contract was originally approved by City Council on March 20, 2019.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Interim Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Community
and Economic Development Department.




Page 268



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Request Authorization to Apply for, Accept and Enter Into Agreements for Fiscal
Year 2021-22 Governor's Office of Highway Safety Grants (Ordinance S-47327)

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to allow staff to apply for,
accept and enter into grant contracts for Fiscal Year 2021-22 with the Arizona
Governor's Office of Highway Safety (GOHS), which includes funding from the DUI
Abatement Council and Proposition 207 funding. Further request authorization for the
City Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller to disburse, all funds related to this
item.

Summary
The GOHS announced the availability of funding on Jan. 7, 2021. Grant proposals are
due by March 19, 2021. If awarded, these funds will be used to support new traffic
safety programs and enhance existing programs in the City Prosecutor's Office, the
Fire Department, the Street Transportation Department and the Police Department.
The total Citywide request for funding is $5,632,058.

City Prosecutor's Office - Total Funding Request $225,000
Traffic Safety Resource Prosecutor: This request is to pay the salary, expenses,
supplies and travel for an existing Traffic Safety Resource Prosecutor (TSRP),
Attorney IV. Approximately half of the funding will be sought from the Oversight Council
on Driving or Operating Under the Influence Abatement Council. The other half will be
requested through a grant from GOHS. GOHS will administer all funds.

The TSRP program will continue its four primary objectives:
· Provide training for prosecutors and law enforcement officers in the prosecution of
traffic safety-related crimes.
· Serve as a resource for questions about traffic laws and trial advocacy.
· Improve communication between prosecutors, law enforcement officers and
members of the judiciary.
· Act as a liaison for individuals and agencies committed to the enforcement and
prosecution of traffic safety-related crimes.

The GOHS has funded the TSRP program since its inception in 2007. Though the
grant project is administered by Phoenix, it benefits citizens, law enforcement and


Page 269

prosecutors across Arizona. The TSRP is a resource to both small and large
jurisdictions for legal issues related to the enforcement of DUI and traffic laws. The
TSRP also provides training to prosecutors, law enforcement officers, crime lab
personnel, interns and community groups. It is anticipated that up to $25,000 of
employee-related expenses will need to be covered by City general funds.

Fire Department - Total Funding Request $360,000
Occupant Protection and Child Car Seat Program: This request is for training,
overtime, related fringe benefits, materials, public education and equipment related to
child safety seats and seat belt usage. This funding will maintain current occupant
protection efforts and increase the frequency of conducting child safety technician
certification and recertification classes; opportunities to educate residents at car seat
check events; the number of locations of designated car seat check fitting stations to
enhance geographical outreach; and to enhance outreach for occupant protection
public education in K-12 schools.

(DUI) Youth Alcohol Awareness: This request is for overtime and related fringe
benefits, materials and equipment related to high school education campaigns
including dramatic mock crashes and classroom education. The program informs
young drivers of the danger of distracted driving, alcohol and other drug impairment
with the goal of decreasing preventable injuries and fatalities associated with impaired
and distracted driving.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program: This request is for overtime, related fringe
benefits, materials and equipment related to education campaigns to increase safety
and traffic awareness and necessary skills of young pedestrians and bicyclists. This
program provides bike rodeos for young cyclists, bike and pedestrian school safety
assemblies and public education opportunities at community safety fairs and events.

Distracted Driving: This request is for overtime and related fringe benefits, materials
and equipment related to high school education campaigns, including teen and adult
education. The goal of this program is to eliminate or minimize injuries and deaths that
involve preventable distracted driving practices by educating drivers to recognize
distractions such as adjusting electronic devices, texting and talking on cell phones
while driving. The program educates young drivers on the dangers of driving distracted
with a goal to decrease preventable injuries and fatalities associated with distracted
driving.

Police Department - Total Funding Request $5,000,000
DUI Enforcement (Traffic Bureau): Funding will provide training, overtime, related
fringe benefits and equipment to support and enhance DUI enforcement within the City


Page 270

of Phoenix and joint enforcement efforts throughout the valley.

Occupant Protection (Traffic Bureau): Funding will provide training, materials, supplies,
overtime and related fringe benefits associated with Click It or Ticket enforcement
activities, child passenger safety technician certification classes, car seat events,
Buckle Up, Baby Hotline and various seatbelt enforcement campaigns.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety (Traffic Bureau): Funding will provide training, materials,
supplies, overtime and related fringe benefits associated with education and
enforcement campaigns designed to increase safety awareness, traffic law knowledge,
and skills among pedestrians and bicyclists.

Traffic Services (Traffic Bureau): Funding will provide training, materials, supplies,
equipment (radar/laser speed detection devices), overtime and related fringe benefits
associated with education and enforcement campaigns such as: Traffic Impact
Programs, school zone enforcement, construction zone enforcement, Traffic Complaint
Hotline enforcement, and selective traffic enforcement programs.

DUI Abatement Council DUI (Traffic Bureau): Funding will be requested from the DUI
Abatement Council for overtime and related fringe benefits associated with DUI
enforcement and innovative Know Your Limit Programs.

Proposition 207 Funding (Traffic Bureau): Funding will be requested for training,
overtime, related fringe benefits, and equipment to support and enhance DUI
enforcement, pedestrian and bicycle safety, occupant protection, and traffic services
within the City of Phoenix.

Street Transportation Department - Total Funding Request $47,058
Roadway Safety/Education Programs: Funding will be requested to develop and
enhance the educational campaigns and tools for school, bicycle, and pedestrian
safety. Requests for pedestrian and bicycle safety include funds for pedestrian safety
promotional materials, bicycle helmets, reflective gear, and LED flashing stop paddles.

Contract Term
One year beginning Oct. 1, 2021 through Sept. 30, 2022. The contract term for
Proposition 207 funds is Jan. 1, 2021 through Dec. 31, 2021.

Financial Impact
Total funding request is $5,632,058. The cost to the City is personnel expenses and in-
kind resources only.



Page 271

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Jeff Barton, the City Prosecutor's
Office and the Fire, Street Transportation and Police departments.




Page 272



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Custodial Services for Fire Locations - Requirements Contract - IFB 17-043B
(Ordinance S-47316)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Contracts 144486 and 144485 with Triangle Services and IWC
LLC, for the purchase of custodial services for the Fire Department. Further request
authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
additional expenditures will not exceed $525,000.

Summary
These contracts provide custodial services for 20 administrative buildings within the
Fire Department. As a result of Prop 206 increases to the minimum wage over the last
three years and unforeseen additional cleaning services related to COVID-19, contract
expenditures have been greater than originally estimated. The services provided under
these contracts include general cleaning of the interior and exterior of facilities,
encompassing floor cleaning, restroom cleaning, and cubicle cleaning and periodic
ancillary services for deep-cleaning and maintenance of floors and upholstery.

Contract Term
The contract term is March 1, 2017 through Feb. 28, 2022.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $525,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $2,473,488. Funds are available in the Fire Department's
budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This contract was originally approved by City Council on Jan. 25, 2017, and additional
expenditures were approved by the City Council on Jan. 24, 2018.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Jeff Barton and the Fire Department.




Page 273



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Amend Ordinance for FY 2020 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science
Improvement Formula Grant Program (Ordinance S-47328)

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to amend the current
ordinance (S-46704) with the Arizona Criminal Justice Commission in support of the
FY 2020 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Formula grant. Authorization
of the amendment will increase the total funding amount from $119,780 to $123,099.
Further request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller
to disburse, all funds related to this item.

Summary
The Police Department has applied for these types of grant funds continually over the
past several years. Funding is used to implement innovative solutions to the backlog
issues facing many crime laboratories nationwide. The Police Department's Crime
Laboratory has made significant strides in addressing these issues by utilizing these
grant funds as part of a comprehensive approach to support and enhance the services
provided to the criminal justice community. Funding will be utilized for overtime, related
fringe benefits, and supplies to improve the timeliness of forensic science services and
to address the backlogs in the analysis of forensic evidence.

Ordinance S-46704 authorized an agreement with the Arizona Criminal Justice
Commission for grant funding not to exceed $119,780. The amendment will increase
the grant funding by $3,319 not to exceed a total of $123,099. All other items will
remain unchanged.

Contract Term
Two-year period beginning on Oct. 1, 2020.

Financial Impact
The Arizona Criminal Justice Commission will provide up to a maximum of $123,099 in
funding under this agreement.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Ordinance S-46704 was adopted by City Council at the June 3, 2020 meeting.



Page 274

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Jeff Barton and the Police
Department.




Page 275



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Aviation Department Airport Planning On-Call Consulting Services for Fiscal
Years 2022-25 (Ordinance S-47294)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate
agreements with the five consultants listed on Attachment A, to provide Airport
Planning On-Call Consulting services for the Aviation Department. Further request to
authorize execution of amendments to the agreements as necessary within the
Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City Controller
to disburse all funds related to this item. The total fee for services will not exceed $7.5
million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
deemed necessary to execute all utilities-related design and construction agreements,
licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the development, design,
and construction of the project and to include disbursement of funds. Utility services
include, but are not limited to: electrical; water; sewer; natural gas;
telecommunications; cable television; railroads; and other modes of transportation.
This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The On-Call consultants will be responsible for providing Airport Planning On-Call
Consulting services that include, but are not limited to: a range of airport planning
functions and analysis related to airfield design; airspace analysis; facility planning;
transportation planning; environmental policy and documentation; land use; grants
administration; land compatibility; mapping; graphics; and public outreach. These
services will be provided to the Aviation Department’s Planning and Environmental
Division, in support of the planning and operation for projects located at Phoenix Sky
Harbor International Airport (PHX), Phoenix Deer Valley Airport (DVT), and Phoenix
Goodyear Airport (GYR) on an as-needed basis.

These Agreements are essential to the health, safety, and welfare of the public and
critical operations for the City.

Procurement Information
The selections were made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in


Page 276

section 34-604 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-604(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Eleven firms submitted proposals
and are listed in Attachment A.

Contract Term
The term of each agreement is up to four years, or up to $1.5 million, whichever occurs
first. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the
term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for each of the On-Call consultants will not exceed $1.5 million,
including all subconsultant and reimbursable costs. The total fee for all services will not
exceed $7.5 million.

Funding is available in the Aviation Department’s Capital Improvement Program and
Operating budgets. The Budget and Research Department will review and approve
funding availability prior to issuance of any On-Call task order of $100,000 or more.
Payments may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services,
which may extend past the agreement termination.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 3400 E. Sky Harbor Blvd.
Phoenix Deer Valley Airport - 702 W. Deer Valley Road
Phoenix Goodyear Airport - 1658 S. Litchfield Road, Goodyear, Ariz.
Council Districts: 1, 8 and Out of City

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Aviation
Department, and the City Engineer.




Page 277
ATTACHMENT A


Selected Firms
Rank 1: HNTB Corporation
Rank 2: Ricondo & Associates, Inc.
Rank 3: HDR Engineering, Inc.
Rank 4: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Rank 5: Landrum & Brown, Incorporated

Additional Proposers
Rank 6: Airbiz Aviation Strategies, LLC
Rank 7: C&S Engineers, Inc.
Rank 8: RS&H, Inc.
Rank 9: InterVISTAS Consulting, Inc.
Rank 10: Coffman Associates, Inc.
Rank 11: Matrix Design Group, Inc.
Rank 12: M. Arthur Gensler Jr. & Associates, Inc.
Rank 13: Cignus Consulting, LLC
Rank 14: Dibble & Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Rank 15: ADM Group, Inc.
Rank 16: Phoenix National Laboratories, Inc.




Page 278



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Sibran Properties, LLC Lease Extension at Phoenix Deer Valley Airport
(Ordinance S-47317)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to extend the Ground Lease
with Sibran Properties, LLC (Sibran) at Phoenix Deer Valley Airport (DVT) for seven
years. Total anticipated revenue over the term will be approximately $66,906.

Summary
Sibran entered into Ground Lease 122664 on Nov. 1, 2008 for 17,700 square feet at
DVT where Sibran operates a self-service aviation gas (AvGas) fueling station. Sibran
has requested to extend the lease for seven years. The extension will ensure DVT
AvGas users continue to have more than one option for fueling their planes, and the
rate adjustment will promote the long-term viability of the self-fueling option at DVT.

Contract Term
The term will be seven years with no renewal options.

Financial Impact
Rent for the first year of the lease will be approximately $9,558 ($0.54 per square foot)
plus applicable taxes. Rent will be adjusted annually thereafter by the Phoenix-Mesa-
Scottsdale Consumer Price Index. Total anticipated revenue over the term will be
approximately $66,906.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
· The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board recommended this item for approval on Jan.
21, 2021, by a vote of 8-0.
· The Transportation, Infrastructure and Innovation Subcommittee recommended this
item for approval on Feb. 3, 2021, by a vote of 4-0.

Location
Deer Valley Airport - 702 W. Deer Valley Road
Council District: 1




Page 279

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 280



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Fare Box Software Upgrade Project (Ordinance S-47324)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 123686 with Scheidt & Bachmann USA, Inc. to maintain and upgrade the
current back-end fare box software to the FareGo Data product for the Public Transit
Department. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreement,
as necessary, within the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below,
and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total additional
fee for services included in this amendment will not exceed $878,585 (including taxes).

Summary
The Public Transit Department (PTD) operates and maintains the Scheidt & Bachmann
USA, Inc. (S&B) Fare Collection System (FCS), which is used to collect transit fares
across the region (bus and rail). The system consists of ticket vending machines,
fareboxes, back-office software, and equipment at the transit garages to record
revenue and ridership data. The system was originally procured in 2007, with the City’s
contract with S&B consisting of maintenance and support activities for the system's
software and back-end. Considering the age of the system and available modifications
that can be implemented in conjunction with the phasing in of the new regional fare
collection system, staff recommends a contract amendment to the City’s contract with
S&B as regional staff continues utilizing the existing fare box components as part of
implementing a new fare collection system.

In addition to the FCS back-office software, there are other software and hardware
systems that will be addressed during this project.

The Windows Operating System (OS) on which the current system is hosted requires
the use of Microsoft-provided Extended Security Updates to prolong the use of the
system; these updates are available through January 2023. The current version of the
FCS does not support the updated version of the Windows OS and can only be
supported with the FareGo Data back-office option.

Additionally, the back-end server/workstation hardware and associated Oracle
databases are nearing their end-of-life, which may put the current system at risk of a
potential failure or may introduce security risks to transit data and the City’s network


Page 281

without additional vendor support. The FareGo Data project will upgrade the existing
S&B software platform, remediate the end-of-life support issues, and mitigate security
risks arising from an out-of-date operating system. The back-office upgrade will also
move PTD to a more flexible open architecture program.

The FareGo Data project is separate from the ongoing regional Fare Collection
Modernization Project, which is currently underway and will provide a modernized
overall fare collection system with onboard validators and implementation of two new
fare purchasing options: a mobile ticketing application and reloadable smartcards.

FareGo Data will provide improved farebox and ridership data management. The
upgraded software system will collect data from the over 900 regional fareboxes and
will ultimately be part of the transition to the new fare collection system by providing
farebox data to the new system.

Financial Impact
The project includes the system upgrade cost and maintenance through January 2023.
The project cost also includes consulting fees (to be used only as needed) of up to 150
hours of support to transition the employer-based Platinum Pass program to the new
fare collection system. The estimated total cost for the upgrade is $878,585 (including
tax), including capital and consulting costs of $590,350, maintenance costs of
$250,735, and consulting fees of $37,500. Transportation 2050 (T2050) funds for the
capital cost and consulting fees are available in the PTD Capital Improvement
Program budget, and T2050 funds for the maintenance cost are available in the PTD
operating budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Maintenance and Service Agreement 123686 (Ordinance S-34282) on July 2, 2007;
· Maintenance and Service Agreement 123686 Amendment (Ordinance S-40050) on
June 19, 2013;
· Maintenance and Service Agreement 123686 Amendment (Ordinance S-41385) on
Dec. 17, 2014; and
· Maintenance and Service Agreement 123686 Amendment (Ordinance S-45234) on
Dec. 12, 2018.

This item was recommended for approval by the Citizen's Transportation Commission
on Jan. 28, 2021, by a vote of 14-0.
This item was recommended for approval by the Transportation, Infrastructure and
Innovation Subcommittee on Feb. 3, 2021, by a vote of 4-0.


Page 282


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Public Transit
Department.




Page 283



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Heavy Duty Bus Procurement - Request to Issue Request for Proposals
(Ordinance S-47325)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to issue a Request for
Proposals for the procurement of at least 243 heavy-duty, 40-foot buses to replace the
City's buses that will reach the end of their useful life in the coming years.

Summary
Phoenix’s heavy-duty bus fleet of 494 buses, which is operated and maintained from
three city-owned garages, currently averages nearly seven years of age. As a result of
this request for proposals, the Public Transit Department (PTD) will replace the oldest
40-foot buses to reduce operating and maintenance costs, as well as provide a more
reliable, comfortable, and efficient service for transit users.

The buses purchased through this five-year contract will replace a total of 243 buses,
with the ability to purchase an additional 57 buses if additional funds (such as
regional/federal grants) become available. PTD’s approved five-year Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) includes the purchase of these vehicles, with such capital
purchases procured with 85 percent federal funding and 15 percent local/regional
funding.

Through the life of the contract, the estimated cost to purchase a 40-foot, heavy-duty
bus ranges between $535,000 to $602,000. Staff anticipates purchasing between 40
and 60 buses each year as the current fleet vehicles reach their end-of-life.

Evaluation Criteria
The following is a breakdown of the evaluation criteria that a panel of qualified staff will
use to recommend award of the contract:

1,000 points total:
· Design: 200
· Quality: 200
· Warranty: 100
· Schedule: 100
· Price: 400


Page 284


Financial Impact
The estimated cost over the course of the contract will be between $138 and $176
million, depending on whether the 57 additional buses are purchased on top of the
planned quantity of 243 units. Funds are programmed in the Public Transit
Department's five-year Capital Improvement Program for the purchase of these
vehicles with 85 percent federal funding and a 15 percent match of local/regional
funding.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item was presented to the Citizen's Transportation Commission on Jan. 28, 2021.
This item was recommended for approval by the Transportation, Infrastructure and
Innovation Subcommittee on Feb. 3, 2021, by a vote of 4-0.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Public Transit
Department.




Page 285



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Routing Information Software - Requirements Contract (Ordinance S-47298)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
RouteSmart Technologies, Inc for ArcGIS software, and all the necessary software
maintenance and support for five licenses. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total fee for services will not
exceed $187,680.

Summary
Public Works Department staff uses this proprietary software to create daily delivery
and collection routes for solid waste services collection vehicles. Other features of the
software assist staff in maximizing efficiencies, including decreased mileage, time and
labor through sequencing of stops, and other measures. In addition, the software
enables staff to enforce collection procedures, including minimizing left-hand turns and
avoiding school zones during pick-up and drop-off times.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, normal competition was waived as
a result of a Determination Memo citing that there is only one source for the necessary
goods and services.

Contract Term
The term of this contract is for four years and the contract shall begin on June 1, 2021.

Financial Impact
Expenditures shall not exceed $187,680 over the life of the contract, with an estimated
annual expenditure of $46,920. Funds are available in the Public Works Department's
budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public Works
Department.


Page 286



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Bard Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Equipment and Parts (Ordinance
S-47300)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Geary Pacific Supply for the purchase of Bard Heating, Ventilation and Air
Conditioning (HVAC) equipment and parts on an as-needed basis. This item will have
an aggregate amount of $375,000. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item.

Summary
The Public Works Department is responsible for maintaining the HVAC systems for 30
radio communication towers. Each tower contains one to six Bard units which provide
critical cooling requirements to those communication towers. The towers are used by
911 dispatch, Police, FBI, Fire, and other law enforcement agencies for radio
communication. This agreement will allow the purchase of necessary parts and
equipment to maintain and repair these systems, which is necessary for proper
operation and to maintain temperatures in these communication towers.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, normal competition was waived as
the result of a determination memo citing that Geary Pacific Supply is the sole source
provider in the State of Arizona for equipment and parts for Bard HVAC systems.

Contract Term
The initial three-year contract term will begin on or about April 1, 2021, with two one-
year options to extend in increments of up to one year, for a total contract term of up to
five years.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contract including all option years is $375,000, including all
applicable taxes, with an estimated annual expenditure of $75,000. Funds are
available in the Public Works Department's budget.




Page 287

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public Works
Department.




Page 288



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
SR85 Litter Removal Cost Sharing Agreement (Ordinance S-47301)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a cost sharing
agreement with Allied Waste Industries, Inc., dba Southwest Regional Landfill, to
reimburse the City for litter removal services along State Route 85 (SR85). Further
request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller to disburse,
all funds related to this item.

Summary
The City of Phoenix (SR85 Landfill) and Allied Waste (Southwest Regional Landfill)
own separate landfills on SR85 in the City of Buckeye. Each party desires to
participate in a joint agreement to remove litter along SR85 from the I-10 interchange
to the Patterson Road interchange attributable in part to each Party’s use of solid
waste transport vehicles on SR85.

The City of Phoenix is responsible for contracting with a third-party vendor to provide
roadway litter removal services as part of this agreement. Both Allied Waste and the
expenses charged to the City for contracted litter collection.

Controlling windblown litter is a regulatory requirement of open landfills.

Contract Term
The contract term is for five years with one, five-year extension and retroactive
beginning on Oct. 1, 2019.

Financial Impact
Allied Waste will reimburse the City $1,600 per month as part of this cost sharing
agreement. This amount due to the City is subject to annual Consumer Price Index
(CPI) adjustments. The cost sharing reimbursement due to the City will never be less
than $1,600 even if the inflation adjustment reflects as such.

Location
SR85 Landfill - 28361 W. Patterson Road, Buckeye, Ariz.
Council District: Out of City


Page 289


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public Works
Department.




Page 290



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Intergovernmental Agreement for Waste Collection and Transportation Mutual
Aid (Ordinance S-47307)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) for Waste Collection and Transportation Mutual
Aid with the cities of Mesa, Avondale, Glendale, Tempe, Scottsdale, Peoria, Surprise
and the towns of Queen Creek and Gilbert.

Summary
The purpose of this IGA is to define procedures for participating jurisdictions to request
emergency assistance and supply resources for waste collection and transportation or
other assistance in emergencies, identify available resources and inventory, and
provide a mechanism for maintenance and repair of these resources. Resources
include, but are not limited to, automated side loaders, bin/barrel delivery vehicles,
front loaders, rear loaders, backhoes, front-end load tractors, pick-up trucks, mobile
equipment, trailers and dump trucks.

Contract Term
This agreement will be effective July 1, 2021 and remain in effect for a five-year period
through June 30, 2026. There are no option years available to extend.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the Public Works Department associated with this IGA.

Location
Council Districts: Citywide and Out of City

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public Works
Department.




Page 291



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Fuel Island Cleaning - Agreement Recommendation (Ordinance S-47310)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with DetailXPerts Franchise Systems, LLC, to provide fuel island cleaning services.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. This item will have a total aggregate amount of $98,280.

Summary
The Public Works Department is responsible for cleaning 18 fuel island locations
throughout the city. The fuel islands must be cleaned to sufficiently remove grease, oil,
dirt, refuse, and grime accumulation. DetailXPerts will provide this service in
compliance with Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) requirements
and use high pressure, low-volume pressure washing, closely monitoring the amount
of water used to prevent runoff.

Procurement Information
Request for Quote (RFQ) 21-FSD-022 was conducted in accordance with
Administrative Regulation 3.10. The Public Works Department received six bids, with
DetailXPerts being the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. The bid evaluation
occurred based on a grand total with the below bid submissions:

DetailXPerts Franchise Systems, LLC: $54,080
Lincoln Constructors, Inc: $70,720
Clean Scene AZ, LLC: $79,040

Contract Term
This agreement will begin on or about March 3, 2021 for an initial one-year term, with
two option years, to be exercised in increments of up to one year, with a total contract
term of three years.

Financial Impact
This item will have an estimated annual expenditure of $32,760, with a total aggregate
amount of $98,280. Funds are available in the Public Works Department's budget.




Page 292

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public Works
Department.




Page 293



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Intergovernmental Agreement with City of Tolleson for Real-Time Traffic
Management Support (Ordinance S-47293)

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the City of Tolleson to participate in the
communication and coordination of all City of Tolleson-owned traffic signals through
System (ATMS). Additionally request the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item. Further request an exemption prohibition set forth in Phoenix City Code
section 42-18 for a governmental entity pursuant to Phoenix City Code section 42-20.
The total estimated contribution from the City of Phoenix will not exceed $7,500.

Summary
The City of Phoenix Street Transportation Department (Streets) wishes to coordinate
all City of Tolleson-owned traffic signals by connecting their signals to Phoenix's ATMS,
which will improve the safety, efficiency, and convenience of vehicular travel through
and around both jurisdictions. The City of Tolleson is located west of Phoenix city
limits, between Buckeye Road and McDowell Road, and is surrounded by Phoenix on
three sides.

Streets owns and operates a central traffic management system to monitor and control
traffic signals in real time. This partnership with the City of Tolleson will allow for base
coordination plans and real-time Active Traffic Management (ATM) in response to
incidents and special events affecting traffic flows on the west side of Phoenix. Streets
will provide traffic signal coordination timing plans to the City of Tolleson, so they can
program Tolleson's traffic signals on Phoenix's network. By having Tolleson's traffic
signals on Streets' ATMS, Tolleson's traffic signal clocks will be synchronized with
Phoenix's, allowing for progression of traffic and responding with predetermined timing
plans to resolve reoccurring and non-reoccurring congestion. Synchronizing the traffic
signal timing of both jurisdictions will provide the traveling public the ability to traverse
along the corridors of McDowell Road, 83rd Avenue, 91st Avenue, and 99th Avenue
with improved traffic flow. Additionally, the installation of communication nodes in the
City of Tolleson city limits will further strengthen the City of Phoenix traffic signal
communications network and provide a more efficient connection to remote signals
owned and operated by Streets.


Page 294


Contract Term
The term of the IGA will be five years beginning on or about Feb. 17, 2021. Provisions
of this agreement include an option to renew for an additional five years with the
consent of both parties, which may be exercised by the City Manager or his designee.

Financial Impact
The total estimated cost of the communications infrastructure is $45,000. The
estimated contribution from the City of Tolleson will be $37,500. The estimated
contribution from the City of Phoenix will not exceed $7,500. Funding is available in the
Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement Program budget.

Location
Various locations in the City of Tolleson, which borders the City of Phoenix at
McDowell Road between 99th and 83rd avenues, 75th Avenue between Buckeye
Road and Van Buren Street, and Buckeye Road between 107th and 75th avenues.
Council Districts: 5, 7 and Out of City

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.




Page 295



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Relief Sewer Project: Van Buren and 52nd Streets - Design-Bid-Build Services -
WS90500295 (Ordinance S-47296)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to accept Hunter Contracting
Co. as the lowest-priced, responsive and responsible bidder and to enter into an
agreement with Hunter Contracting Co. for Design-Bid-Build Services for the Relief
Sewer Project: Van Buren and 52nd Street. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The fee for services will not exceed
$3,522,369.

Summary
This project was established under the Sanitary Sewer Relief Program. Flow
monitoring showed the existing 8-inch diameter sanitary sewer line, in the area of Van
Buren Street between 52nd Street and the Phoenix Zoo, at times surcharged by as
much as two to four inches. As a result, a relief sewer project was recommended for
this area.

Hunter Contracting Co.'s services include, but are not limited to: the installation of
approximately 5,000 linear feet (LF) of 12-inch diameter sanitary sewer line and 500
LF of 8-inch sewer, abandonment of approximately 3,250 LF of 8-inch sewer and 250
LF of 10-inch sewer, installation of approximately 1,070 LF of 36-inch storm drain
main, 25 sewer manholes, and eight storm drain manholes.

This Agreement is essential to the health, safety, and welfare of the public and critical
operations for the City.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using an Invitation for Bids procurement process set forth in
section 34-201 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. Seven bids were received on Nov. 17,
2020, and were sent to the Equal Opportunity Department for review to determine
subcontractor eligibility and contractor responsiveness in demonstrating
responsiveness to Small Business Enterprise program requirements.

The Opinion of Probable Cost and the four lowest responsive, responsible bidders are
listed below:


Page 296


Opinion of Probable Cost: $4,163,035
Hunter Contracting: $3,522,368.20
T & T Construction Inc.: $3,881,840.50
Achen Gardner Construction LLC: $4,997,701.00
The Fishel Construction Company: $5,894,509.00

Bidders who were deemed non-responsive are listed below, in alphabetical order:
Action Direct LLC dba Redpoint Contracting
Degan Construction, LLC
FPS Civil, LLC

The bid award amount is within the total budget for this project. There are no specific
cost differences found by the Engineer to be of a concern that would prevent the City
from moving forward with the lowest responsive bid amount.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is 425 calendar days from issuance of the Notice to
Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of
the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of
the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Hunter Contracting Co. will not exceed $3,522,369.00,
including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.

Location
Van Buren Street and 52nd Street to Galvin Parkway
Council District: 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Karen Peters and Mario Paniagua,
the Water Services Department, and the City Engineer.




Page 297



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Agreement with Arizona Department of Transportation For Rights of Way along
South Mountain Freeway / Loop 202 (Congressman Ed Pastor Freeway) -
Amendment 1 (Ordinance S-47302)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend the existing
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the Arizona Department of Transportation
(ADOT) related to the rights of way along the South Mountain Freeway / Loop 202
(Congressman Ed Pastor Freeway). The original agreement allowed the State to bring
in rights of way into the State's system for areas needed for construction of the
Congressman Ed Pastor Freeway, which included portions of City of Phoenix streets
that crossed the freeway alignment. This amendment will allow the State to transfer
back ownership of those portions of City streets that are no longer needed by the State
as the Congressman Ed Pastor Freeway has been completed.

Summary
ADOT opened the Congressman Ed Pastor Freeway in December 2019 and has now
issued final acceptance of the project. With this amended agreement, the State will
abandon ownership, jurisdiction and maintenance responsibilities of those City of
Phoenix cross streets no longer needed for the construction of Congressman Ed
Pastor Freeway and are outside of the State’s access control limits. These
responsibilities will be returned to the City of Phoenix.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved the original IGA on Oct. 21, 2015 (Ordinance S-42094).

Location
Congressman Ed Pastor Freeway: Interstate 10 (I-10) - 59th Avenue alignment to
south Pecos Road.
Council Districts: 6, 7 and 8




Page 298

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.




Page 299



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Agreement with Arizona Department of Transportation for Landscape and
Abandonment for Interstate 10 Broadway Curve Improvement Project
(Ordinance S-47303)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the Arizona Department of Transportation
(ADOT) for Interstate 10 Broadway Curve Improvement Project (Broadway Curve
Project). This agreement establishes the operations and maintenance responsibilities
of ADOT and the City of Phoenix, as well as abandonment of ownership, jurisdiction,
and maintenance responsibilities until after final acceptance of the Broadway Curve
Project.

Summary
This agreement continues the City of Phoenix and ADOT's partnership on the freeway
maintenance responsibilities as set forth in the IGA 18-0006976-I Master Maintenance
Agreement dated Nov. 7, 2018.

Specifically, the agreement outlines the limits of the project, interchanges, and cross
streets that each party is responsible to maintain after construction is complete. These
responsibilities include delegation of reconstruction, major and minor rehabilitation of
roadways, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, landscape and irrigation, and the different
operation and maintenance components.

Contract Term
This agreement shall remain in effect until completion of the Broadway Curve Project.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City.

Location
Interstate 10, from Interstate 17 to State Route 202 Loop.
Council Districts: 4, 7 and 8




Page 300

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.




Page 301



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Intergovernmental Agreement with Arizona Department of Transportation for
Maintenance of Congressman Ed Pastor Freeway (South Mountain Freeway /
Loop 202) - Amendment 1 (Ordinance S-47311)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend the existing
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the Arizona Department of Transportation
(ADOT) to maintain portions of Congressman Ed Pastor Freeway, a State highway
system encompassed within the City of Phoenix's system of streets. This agreement
establishes the responsibilities of ADOT and the City of Phoenix for operations and
maintenance. This agreement also identifies related maintenance responsibilities of
the freeway developer, who is separately contracted with by ADOT. There is no
financial impact to the City.

Summary
This agreement continues the City of Phoenix and ADOT's partnership on the freeway
maintenance responsibilities as set forth in the IGA 18-0006976-I Master Maintenance
Agreement.

Specifically, the agreement outlines the limits of the project, interchanges, frontage
roads, and cross streets that each party is responsible to maintain after construction is
complete. These responsibilities include: delegation of reconstruction; major and minor
rehabilitation of roadways, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drainage facilities, and pedestrian
bridges; and the different operation and maintenance components.

Contract Term
This agreement shall remain in full force and effect for successive periods of five years
from the effective date and may be amended upon mutual written consent of both
parties and approval of City Council. This agreement shall be reviewed, and all
reviews shall be completed within 60 days prior to the end of the 5th year anniversary
date.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City of Phoenix.




Page 302

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved the original IGA on Oct. 21, 2015 (Ordinance S-42093).

Location
Congressman Ed Pastor Freeway (South Mountain Freeway / Loop 202: Interstate 10
- 59th Avenue alignment to south Pecos Road).
Council Districts: 6, 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.




Page 303



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Support for Formation of Tonka Vista Irrigation Water Delivery District
(Resolution 21894)

Request to adopt a resolution to support formation of the Tonka Vista Irrigation Water
Delivery District (IWDD) through Maricopa County. The proposed IWDD includes the
single-family residential properties bounded by Bethany Home Road to the south,
Claremont Street to the north, 18th Street to the west, and 20th Street to the east. This
action has no financial impact to the City of Phoenix.

Summary
Under the provisions of Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) Chapter 20, Title 48,
Irrigation Water Delivery Districts, when the majority of the lot or parcel owners entitled
to or capable of receiving irrigation water from the same system want irrigation water
delivered to their lands, they may propose the organization of an IWDD. Maricopa
County requires that applicants for an IWDD within City of Phoenix boundaries obtain
establishing a district.

If approved by the City Council, landowning neighbors seeking an IWDD complete a
special taxation impact statement and submit this document to the Maricopa County
Board of Supervisors. The Board of Supervisors, along with Salt River Project (SRP),
will decide if a petition to organize an IWDD may be circulated. See Attachment A for
the Consent from SRP to the Board of Supervisors.

This request has been reviewed by the Water Services Department.

Financial Impact
This action has no financial impact to the City of Phoenix.

Public Outreach
On Dec. 7, 2020, the City received a formal written request from City of Phoenix
resident Steve Caprara, representative for the Tonka Vista neighborhood, to pursue
Council approval to form an IWDD with Maricopa County (Attachment B).




Page 304


Location
The proposed IWDD includes the single-family residential properties bounded by
Bethany Home Road to the south, Claremont Street to the north, 18th Street to the
west, and 20th Street to the east.
Council District: 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.




Page 305
Attachment A
Consent from SRP to Board of Supv and Map of SRP Delivery System




Page 306
Page 307
Attachment B
Request Letter and Map Submitted by Tonka Vista

To: Brian Fellows

12/07/2020


From: Tonka Vista IWDD
Steve Caprara, Representative
RE: Request for Formation of Irrigation Water Delivery District


Dear Brian,

We as a neighborhood “Tonka Vista IWDD” are requesting consent to form an Irrigation
Water Delivery District (IWDD) from the City of Phoenix. The purpose of the IWDD is the fair
use and upkeep of the irrigation system by property tax assignment for our homeowners.
We ask that the City Council would pass this request of resolution, authorizing this IWDD.

Enclosed you will find Salt River Projects approval along with maps of the proposed district
and the homeowner list. I will be the spokesperson for the proposed IWDD. Once we
receive approval from the City of Phoenix, we will be submitting an Impact Statement to
form an IWDD to Maricopa County Board of Supervisors.

Sincerely,

Steve Caprara



For: Tonka Vista IWDD




Page 308
TONKA VISTA OWNERSHIP REPORT
8/31/2020
EXHIBIT D
Total Net
Total Total Assessed Assessed
Improvement Assessed Net Value Value Total
Count Parcel No Tax Year Owner Name In Care Of City State Zip Situs City Zip Land FCV FCV Total FCV FCV FCV Total LPV (LPV) (LPV) Acreage
ARMOUR E BLACK AND SUZANNE SCHOLL
1 164-41-015 2020 BLACK LIVING TRUST BLACK ARMOUR E TR PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 PHOENIX 85016 $109,200 $436,900 $546,100 $54,610 $54,610 $321,623 $32,162 $32,162 0.304
2 164-41-065 2020 AVERY CHRISTOPHER/MARSHA L PHOENIX AZ 850160000 PHOENIX 85016 $79,700 $319,100 $398,800 $39,880 $39,880 $238,136 $23,814 $23,814 0.334
3 164-41-070 2020 BECKETT JUSTIN G/MICHELLE J PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $109,900 $439,700 $549,600 $54,960 $54,960 $409,282 $40,928 $40,928 0.361
4 164-41-060 2020 BIELING OLGA PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $103,400 $413,900 $517,300 $51,730 $51,730 $291,874 $29,187 $29,187 0.310

5 164-41-059 2020 BRECHEISEN JUDITH/RICHARD FAMILY TR PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $95,700 $382,800 $478,500 $47,850 $47,850 $357,373 $35,737 $35,737 0.329
6 164-38-040 2020 CAPRARA STEVE PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $100,900 $403,900 $504,800 $50,480 $50,480 $305,543 $30,554 $30,554 0.340
7 164-41-032 2020 CARDINAL CAPITAL CO PHOENIX AZ 85011 PHOENIX 85016 $84,200 $336,900 $421,100 $42,110 $42,110 $275,256 $27,526 $27,526 0.262
8 164-41-008 2020 CEJUDO HENRY PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $125,800 $503,300 $629,100 $62,910 $62,910 $462,420 $46,242 $46,242 0.327
9 164-41-011 2020 CHRISTOPHER J KLOECKL LIVING TRUST PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $84,600 $338,600 $423,200 $42,320 $42,320 $237,134 $23,713 $23,713 0.319
10 164-41-042 2020 CLOCKSIN DON/NAGEL SABRINA PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $93,600 $374,500 $468,100 $46,810 $46,810 $346,728 $34,673 $34,673 0.259
11 164-41-040A 2020 CONLEE MICHAEL W PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $89,900 $359,800 $449,700 $44,970 $44,970 $336,258 $33,626 $33,626 0.289
12 164-41-045 2020 DAGHER MICHEL/KAREN JANET PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $136,400 $545,800 $682,200 $68,220 $68,220 $434,324 $43,432 $43,432 0.621
C TERRY/KATHLEEN DAVIDSON
13 164-41-003 2020 DAVIDSON FAMILY TRUST TRUSTEES PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $118,900 $475,800 $594,700 $59,470 $59,470 $430,308 $43,031 $43,031 0.353
14 164-41-046 2020 DAVIS REVOCABLE TRUST DAVIS GREGG A/JAMIE E TR PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $156,200 $624,900 $781,100 $78,110 $78,110 $497,112 $49,711 $49,711 0.619
15 164-41-001 2020 DELACERDA IRENE D PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $75,800 $303,400 $379,200 $37,920 $37,920 $215,756 $21,576 $21,576 0.344
16 164-41-062 2020 DEMOSTHENES EDWARD/JACQUELINE PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $115,800 $463,500 $579,300 $57,930 $57,930 $397,205 $39,721 $39,721 0.340
17 164-41-074 2020 DONOVAN JOSEPH HERBERGER ENTERPRISES INC SCOTTSDALE AZ 85254 PHOENIX 85016 $95,900 $383,600 $479,500 $47,950 $47,950 $294,553 $29,455 $29,455 0.348
DORIS HOGUE DOBYNS FAMILY LIVING
18 164-41-066 2020 TRUST PHOENIX AZ 85022 PHOENIX 85016 $92,400 $369,900 $462,300 $46,230 $46,230 $299,778 $29,978 $29,978 0.333
Page 309

19 164-41-038A 2020 ENGLISH THOMAS & MARY E PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $82,600 $330,600 $413,200 $41,320 $41,320 $224,466 $22,447 $22,447 0.282
20 164-41-055A 2020 FERNANDES DANE K/CYNTHIA E PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $182,300 $729,400 $911,700 $91,170 $91,170 $688,263 $68,826 $68,826 0.722
21 164-41-052 2020 FORESIGHT FAMILY TRUST CORK ROBERT C/MARCELLA A TR PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $154,900 $619,800 $774,700 $77,470 $77,470 $550,037 $55,004 $55,004 0.614
22 164-41-025 2020 FULTON JUDITH D TR PHOENIX AZ 850160000 PHOENIX 85016 $120,100 $480,500 $600,600 $60,060 $60,060 $354,857 $35,486 $35,486 0.595
23 164-38-044 2020 GIAVANTI MICHAEL JAMES PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $151,600 $606,500 $758,100 $75,810 $75,810 $472,117 $47,212 $47,212 0.887
GOEBEL FREDETTE J TR/GOEBEL FREDERICK
24 164-41-063 2020 A PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $97,900 $391,700 $489,600 $48,960 $48,960 $291,472 $29,147 $29,147 0.337
25 164-41-056 2020 GORCHOFF MARK E PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $112,300 $449,400 $561,700 $56,170 $56,170 $325,912 $32,591 $32,591 0.300
26 164-41-029 2020 GORMAN JEAN T PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $96,900 $387,900 $484,800 $48,480 $48,480 $305,811 $30,581 $30,581 0.343
27 164-38-043 2020 GRIFFIN JAMES M/SUSAN M PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $178,300 $713,500 $891,800 $89,180 $89,180 $607,971 $60,797 $60,797 0.621
28 164-41-006 2020 GRIFFIN THOMAS T PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $108,900 $435,900 $544,800 $54,480 $54,480 $342,528 $34,253 $34,253 0.356

29 164-41-054 2020 HERZOG JOSEPH MICHAEL/MARCIE RAGAN PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $103,800 $415,500 $519,300 $51,930 $51,930 $295,491 $29,549 $29,549 0.381
30 164-41-051 2020 HOLMBERG JOHN/MEGAN PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $168,400 $673,900 $842,300 $84,230 $84,230 $623,700 $62,370 $62,370 1.059
31 164-41-028 2020 HUNTER PROPERTY LLC PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $122,800 $491,400 $614,200 $61,420 $61,420 $450,983 $45,098 $45,098 0.353
JOSEPH BERTRAM AND BETSY SHARON
32 164-38-038 2020 BUXER LIV TR PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $109,100 $436,400 $545,500 $54,550 $54,550 $320,416 $32,042 $32,042 0.341
33 164-41-014 2020 KAISER AARON/JENNY M PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $93,100 $372,400 $465,500 $46,550 $46,550 $272,307 $27,231 $27,231 0.346

34 164-41-026 2020 KCM FAMILY TRUST/MALEDON WILLIAM J PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $179,000 $716,300 $895,300 $89,530 $89,530 $521,572 $52,157 $52,157 0.578
PERRY CHRISTOPHER
35 164-41-049 2020 KCP REVOCABLE TRUST IAN/KATHERINE HAYDON TR PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $178,400 $713,700 $892,100 $89,210 $89,210 $709,643 $70,964 $70,964 0.626



TONKA VISTA OWNERSHIP REPORT
8/31/2020
EXHIBIT D
36 164-41-073 2020 KELASH DENNIS J/DEVONEY M PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $114,900 $459,600 $574,500 $57,450 $57,450 $349,363 $34,936 $34,936 0.355
37 164-41-067 2020 KELLY MARA PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $91,400 $365,600 $457,000 $45,700 $45,700 $267,617 $26,762 $26,762 0.334
38 164-41-072 2020 KESLER KRISTOPHER R PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $156,400 $625,700 $782,100 $78,210 $78,210 $541,398 $54,140 $54,140 0.358

39 164-41-071 2020 KIP A AND DANA L DARDEN FAMILY TRUST PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $123,100 $492,400 $615,500 $61,550 $61,550 $456,790 $45,679 $45,679 0.437
40 164-41-012 2020 KUHMAN RONALD W PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $137,600 $550,600 $688,200 $68,820 $68,820 $502,872 $50,287 $50,287 0.330
41 164-41-024 2020 LANG MICHAEL J/SARAH K PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $157,600 $630,600 $788,200 $78,820 $78,820 $469,228 $46,923 $46,923 0.631
42 164-41-018 2020 LARSON CINDI PHOENIX AZ 85050 PHOENIX 85016 $143,300 $573,500 $716,800 $71,680 $71,680 $501,760 $50,176 $50,176 0.321
43 164-41-034 2020 LEIGHT STEVEN P/CHERYL A PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $72,700 $291,100 $363,800 $36,380 $36,380 $241,241 $24,124 $24,124 0.253
44 164-41-037A 2020 LISCIARELLI SHIRLEY M TR PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $71,600 $286,500 $358,100 $35,810 $35,810 $211,736 $21,174 $21,174 0.275
LITTLEFIELD HINDMAN REVOCABLE LIVING LITTLEFIELD DAVID/HINDMAN
45 164-41-053 2020 TRUST MICHELLE TR PHOENIX AZ 850161924 PHOENIX 85016 $136,400 $545,900 $682,300 $68,230 $68,230 $484,433 $48,443 $48,443 0.463
LEOHNIS GUY JEROME/RYAN KELLY
46 164-41-033 2020 LOEHNIS AND RYAN FAMILY TRUST ANN TR PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $118,200 $472,900 $591,100 $59,110 $59,110 $370,730 $37,073 $37,073 0.259
DROGE ERIK RODOLOF M/MARION
47 164-41-048 2020 MARIK TRUST I ALEXANDRA TR PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $147,800 $591,200 $739,000 $73,900 $73,900 $472,787 $47,279 $47,279 0.580
MARK COLLAR AND LESLIE KLAND FAMILY
48 164-38-041 2020 TRUST PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $105,300 $421,200 $526,500 $52,650 $52,650 $314,252 $31,425 $31,425 0.354
49 164-41-069 2020 MARY ANN SEARS TRUST PRESCOTT AZ 86303 PHOENIX 85016 $82,500 $330,300 $412,800 $41,280 $41,280 $255,288 $25,529 $25,529 0.359
MCGRANAHAN MICHAEL CURTIS/DAVISON
50 164-41-057 2020 BETTY SUSAN PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $134,600 $538,600 $673,200 $67,320 $67,320 $489,606 $48,961 $48,961 0.329
51 164-41-044 2020 MCLAIN LARRY K/JOYCE D PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $107,500 $430,000 $537,500 $53,750 $53,750 $320,954 $32,095 $32,095 0.610
52 164-41-009 2020 MCROBERTS ROBERT A/JENIFER M PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $97,700 $390,800 $488,500 $48,850 $48,850 $305,676 $30,568 $30,568 0.339
53 164-41-043 2020 MEDINA SYLVIA/SORKHABI MICHAEL PHOENIX AZ 850162624 PHOENIX 85016 $120,900 $483,800 $604,700 $60,470 $60,470 $454,854 $45,485 $45,485 0.381
54 164-41-010 2020 MERINGER JAMES A PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $126,700 $507,100 $633,800 $63,380 $63,380 $471,833 $47,183 $47,183 0.331
MIKSTA STEVEN JOHN/DAWN MARIE
Page 310
55 164-41-058 2020 MIKSTA FAMILY TRUST TR PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $86,600 $346,400 $433,000 $43,300 $43,300 $261,319 $26,132 $26,132 0.313
56 164-41-036A 2020 MONSON THOMAS G & DIANNE F PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $94,200 $377,100 $471,300 $47,130 $47,130 $280,348 $28,035 $28,035 0.281
57 164-41-022 2020 MOUER JAMES R/JOYCE A TR PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $157,500 $630,100 $787,600 $78,760 $78,760 $447,190 $44,719 $44,719 0.678
58 164-41-023 2020 NACHLAS EMILY/AARON SETH PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $191,500 $766,100 $957,600 $95,760 $95,760 $589,107 $58,911 $58,911 0.518
NUTE STEPHEN JOHN/SLOULIN KOREEN LEE
59 164-41-017 2020 TR PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $99,600 $398,500 $498,100 $49,810 $49,810 $294,151 $29,415 $29,415 0.308
60 164-41-061 2020 PILLEY MELISSA/BARNES SCOTT PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $106,700 $426,800 $533,500 $53,350 $53,350 $351,506 $35,151 $35,151 0.330
61 164-41-047 2020 POULOS ALEXANDER/DEANNE PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $146,300 $585,500 $731,800 $73,180 $73,180 $449,201 $44,920 $44,920 0.619
62 164-41-019 2020 PRESTON BRYAN M/MIRANDA A PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $121,900 $487,800 $609,700 $60,970 $60,970 $402,896 $40,290 $40,290 0.305
ROBERT FINTELMAN TRUST/LARUA SNYDER
63 164-41-027 2020 TRUST PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $119,200 $477,000 $596,200 $59,620 $59,620 $425,645 $42,565 $42,565 0.400
64 164-41-031 2020 ROGERS JAN B/SUSAN R PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $84,600 $338,700 $423,300 $42,330 $42,330 $238,537 $23,854 $23,854 0.344
65 164-41-039A 2020 SARAH JESSICA BARKER TRUST CUNNINGHAM SUSAN MARIE TR PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $78,200 $313,000 $391,200 $39,120 $39,120 $221,116 $22,112 $22,112 0.286
66 164-41-035 2020 SCHNEIDER DANNA RACHEL/BARRY PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $99,000 $396,200 $495,200 $49,520 $49,520 $311,975 $31,198 $31,198 0.266
67 164-41-004 2020 SHAUGHNESSY TIMOTHY M PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $174,600 $698,600 $873,200 $87,320 $87,320 $646,985 $64,699 $64,699 0.443
68 164-38-045 2020 SILKE C BABCOCK TRUST BABCOCK SILKE C TRUSTEE PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $192,300 $769,400 $961,700 $96,170 $96,170 $742,107 $74,211 $74,211 0.628
69 164-38-039 2020 SL CLEVENGER TRUST PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $104,400 $417,700 $522,100 $52,210 $52,210 $382,711 $38,271 $38,271 0.343
70 164-41-013 2020 SPENCER LOWELL A TR SCOTTSDALE AZ 852558902 PHOENIX 85016 $112,800 $451,400 $564,200 $56,420 $56,420 $343,333 $34,333 $34,333 0.326
71 164-41-005 2020 STEVEN MARK/HARDY DONALD E TR PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $98,200 $392,900 $491,100 $49,110 $49,110 $292,810 $29,281 $29,281 0.369
72 164-41-007 2020 STOUFFER BRADLEY S/NANCY BALDING PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $125,200 $501,000 $626,200 $62,620 $62,620 $382,061 $38,206 $38,206 0.352
SURVIV TRUST OF HARRY C & LINDA D
73 164-41-050 2020 PERNELL TRU PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $126,700 $506,900 $633,600 $63,360 $63,360 $435,093 $43,509 $43,509 0.628




TONKA VISTA OWNERSHIP REPORT
8/31/2020
EXHIBIT D

74 164-41-016 2020 THOMAS AND BRENDA CANTY LIVING TRUST PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $98,900 $395,600 $494,500 $49,450 $49,450 $299,243 $29,924 $29,924 0.314
75 164-41-030 2020 TIMS FAMILY TRUST PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $121,200 $485,000 $606,200 $60,620 $60,620 $260,918 $26,092 $26,092 0.352
76 164-41-068 2020 TOCCO TYLER E/BAILEY H PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $97,100 $388,700 $485,800 $48,580 $48,580 $293,481 $29,348 $29,348 0.336
77 164-41-021 2020 TRAPP STEVE E/RENEE A TR PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $148,000 $592,100 $740,100 $74,010 $74,010 $567,117 $56,712 $56,712 0.498
78 164-41-002 2020 W & L SPONCIL LIVING TRUST SPONCIL WAYNE A/LISA M TR PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $193,700 $775,100 $968,800 $96,880 $96,880 $609,744 $60,974 $60,974 0.355 0.409
79 164-41-064 2020 WALLEN SMITH STEFANI A/SMITH MIKE PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $110,400 $441,900 $552,300 $55,230 $55,230 $322,695 $32,270 $32,270 0.335
80 164-41-020 2020 WEYER JANELLE L PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $228,300 $913,400 $1,141,700 $114,170 $114,170 $801,582 $80,158 $80,158 0.400
81 164-38-042 2020 WORTH FAMILY WORTH JOHN R/LAUREN J TR PHOENIX AZ 85016 PHOENIX 85016 $94,600 $378,500 $473,100 $47,310 $47,310 $280,750 $28,075 $28,075 0.399

$9,766,600 $39,079,900 $48,846,500 $4,884,650 $4,884,650 $31,924,248 $3,192,428 $3,192,428 33.158




Page 311




3 6
4A 1
5D 1
Page 312 1
4 1
4 1
7 1
5A
6 1
1 1
4A 6
5C
3 6
9 1
8 1
2 6
3 1
4 6
6 1
7 1
039 6
8E1
9 1
8 6
501 N1
7thS
t 1
8 1
0 1
4 616450015
/ 1
8 1
2 6
8F
702 6
2 143
3 6
8A1
1A 1
9 6
3 1
8 1
3 6
2 6
7G
9A 1
9 6
3 1
9 6
702 6
3 147
927 1
7K 1
3D 1
0N
1 1
0U
0C
6 1
9 643
5 07
3L 1
4 1
6B
0Q1
0T 1
3B 1
5A
3A 1
N1
7thP
l
S
R51
S
R51
N1 t
thS
031 1
11 6
0 144
174 6
064 6
837 6
1 1
0 1
133 o
ERs n
eL 1
030 1
00 6
9 144
0 4
173 6
063 6
836 6
900 1
N1
8thP
l
9 1
10 6
8 141
072 1
062 1
5 6
037 1
1 1
9 6
938 1
3 1

A1
8 6
1 6
1 EK 644
1 1
905 e 1
im 58

039 5

6 1
7A 64 D 1
64 1

1 4 4
1 1

r 0 1
ve
50 6 0
a tteA
rle
4 10 6
EM
18 0 1
3 1
5 1
7 6 1644 1
8A 16 0 44
9 6
073 44 164 59
0 16
16 1 410 1
10 1
6 05
164 1
3 1
2 N1
9thS
t
974 6
3A 44
6 6
5 071
50 6
9 6
8 6
075 6
4 1
6 6 410 r 1
0A 4 05 Ci 1
1 1
4 164 e
01 64 s
4 1
6 E 9 1 Ro
6 E
2 1
0 1
Ro
8 1
1 1
9 1
2 1
2 1
ve 1
6 1
y
3 1
9A 4
145 1
402 e g
rrid n
eL 1
EB 1
2C

A
a
EP e
loV eD
rd r 6
044 Ci
41 la
EC m
re n
o t
tS
r


047 1
01 1
4 6
5 1
4 6
4 6
,00
0 1
N2 t
thS
9A
r 6
0A 1
9 1
0 1
6 6
h oD 1
5B 1
4A
anc
ER 1
7H EB
eth
anyH
omeR
d
4 1
9B
,50
0 1
7E


T
onk
aVistaIW
DD
5 1
7F
3 1
2B
807 6
1G
7 16
2T 44
4C 1
4D 1
8 20
,00
0 N2 G
1s
7G
1 44
tS
t
5A
0 1
9 05
6 1
7J
Fee
t 1
1 4
6 2 644
44 sr
44 7 420
6 20 C
80 53 44 1
2Q
a
7 78 1
5F 20
on
480 5 164 1
3J
164 4 riz
5 1
1 A
0A 4 55 644
4 1
64 2
2 1
42042 06 644 2
164 067 6
3H
9 3 2 6
07 06
56 N
6 1
8A 2
e
yA
e v
o
ERv
28 06 16
16 2
4 44
16 2
N2n t
dS 442 6
4 P
l 59 20
44 58
1 20 07 20
18 2
Cl ityo
fPhoenix 4 6
1 44
644 6
P 501
0 6445041
1 6
164 1s 1
6 40
d 450
39 4
t 4
06 1
8C
S
tre
ets
L
e g
end 16
n
164 1 1
450 1
51 16442050 644
22 38 0
4 20
1 0
6 2
T
axP
arce
ls
1 445 6
N 6 036
A
0 4 A
37 4
D
ate
:6/1
/20
N2
3rdS 1
9 16442044
t
3 08
4 6
045 2 1
3B 6
2 1
4 6
144 6



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Zone 3D and 4A Improvements Program: Water Transmission Main -
Construction Manager at Risk Services Amendment - WS85500442 and
WS90500306 (Ordinance S-47297)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 152402 with Sundt Construction, Inc. (Sundt) to provide additional
Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) Services for the Zone 3D and 4A Improvements
Program: Water Transmission Main project. Further request to authorize execution of
amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure
authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item. The additional fee for services included in this amendment will not exceed
$48.1 million.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to supply water in north Phoenix in the event there are
restrictions placed on Colorado River water delivered through the Central Arizona
Project. The City of Phoenix treats Colorado River water at the Union Hills and Lake
Pleasant Water Treatment Plants (WTPs), which supply water to north Phoenix.

This amendment is necessary to proceed with construction of a new 66-inch pipeline
from the 24th Street WTP to water infrastructure in north Phoenix to allow for the
delivery of Salt and Verde River water into north Phoenix. Scope of services will
include installation of the 66-inch pipeline and corresponding activities in this segment,
and construction of a relief sewer parallel to the 66-inch pipeline on 32nd Street. This
amendment will provide additional funds to the agreement.

Sundt will be responsible for construction means and methods related to the project
and fulfilling the Small Business Enterprise program requirements. Sundt will be
required to solicit bids from pre-qualified subcontractors and to perform the work using
the City’s subcontractor selection process. Sundt may also compete to self-perform
limited amounts of work.

This Agreement is essential to the health, safety, and welfare of the public and critical
operations for the City.



Page 313

Contract Term
The term of the agreement amendment is for two years from issuance of the Notice to
Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of
the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of
the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
· The initial agreement was authorized for an amount not to exceed $15 million.
· This amendment will increase the agreement by an amount not to exceed $48.1
million, for a new total amount not to exceed $63.1 million.

Funding for this amendment is available in the Water Services Department's Capital
Improvement Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately
review and approve funding availability prior to execution of any amendments.
Payments may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services,
which may extend past the agreement termination.

Concurrent/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Engineering Services Agreement 149803 (Ordinance S-45175) on Dec. 5, 2018;
· CMAR Preconstruction Services Agreement 148952 (Ordinance S-45171) on Dec.
5, 2018; and
· CMAR Construction Services Agreement 152402 (Ordinance S-46723) on June 17,
2020.

Location
32nd Street south of Shea Boulevard to Greenway Road
Greenway Road from 32nd to 31st Streets
31st Street from Greenway to Bell Roads
Bell Road from 31st to 32nd Streets
Council Districts: 2, 3 and 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Karen Peters and Mario Paniagua,
the Water Services Department, and the City Engineer.




Page 314



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Wastewater Collection System Emergency Repair and Replacement - Job Order
Contracting Services - 4108JOC196 (Ordinance S-47299)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate master
agreements with two contractors to provide Wastewater Collection System Emergency
Repair and Replacement Job Order Contracting (JOC) services for the Water Services
Department. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreement
as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below,
and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total fee for
services will not exceed $20 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
deemed necessary to execute all utilities-related design and construction agreements,
licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the development, design,
and construction of the project and to include disbursement of funds. Utility services
include, but are not limited to: electrical; water; sewer; natural gas;
telecommunications; cable television; railroads; and other modes of transportation.
This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The JOC contractors' services will be used on an as-needed basis to provide
Wastewater Collection System Emergency Repair and Replacement services for repair
or replacement of sanitary sewer lines and force mains. Additionally, the JOC
contractors will be responsible for fulfilling Small Business Enterprise program
requirements.

These Agreements are essential to the health, safety, and welfare of the public and
critical operations for the City.

Procurement Information
The selections were made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-604 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-604(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Eight firms submitted proposals
and are listed below.


Page 315


Selected Firms
Rank 1: WaCo, LLC dba WaCo Contracting
Rank 2: Achen-Gardner Construction, LLC

Additional Proposers
Rank 3: TF Contracting Services, LLC
Rank 4: FPS Civil, LLC
Rank 5: Action Direct LLC dba Redpoint Contracting
Rank 6: Blucor Contracting, Inc.
Rank 7: Kinkaid Civil Construction, LLC
Rank 8: Degan Construction, LLC

Contract Term
The term of each master agreement is for up to five years, or up to $10 million,
whichever occurs first. Work scope identified and incorporated into the master
agreement prior to the end of the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may
extend past the termination of the master agreement. No additional changes may be
executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The master agreement values for each of the JOC contractors will not exceed $10
million, including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs. The total fee for services
will not exceed $20 million. The value for each job order agreement performed under
this master agreement will be up to $2 million. In no event will any job order agreement
exceed this limit without Council approval to increase the limit.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement
Program. The Budget and Research Department will review and approve funding
availability prior to issuance of any job order agreement. Payments may be made up to
agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Karen Peters and Mario Paniagua,
the Water Services Department, and the City Engineer.




Page 316



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Intergovernmental Agreement with Arizona Department of Transportation for
Right-of-Way Along State Route 51 Near Northern Avenue and 26th Street
(Ordinance S-47308)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Arizona Department of Transportation
(ADOT) to accept ownership, jurisdiction and maintenance responsibilities for right-of-
way adjacent to, and on both sides of State Route 51 (SR51) near Northern Avenue
and 26th Street. This will be used by the City in the construction of water transmission
mains for the Zone 3D and 4A Improvements Program. Further request the City
Council grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion
of the IGA of indemnification and assumption of liability provisions that otherwise are
prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. There is no direct financial impact to the City
for this agreement.

Summary
The purpose of the Water Services Department's (WSD) Zone 3D and 4A
Improvements Program is to assist with supplementing the potable water distribution
system in north Phoenix, in the event of restrictions placed on Colorado River water.
To accomplish this the WSD will construct water transmission mains from the 24th
Street Water Treatment Plant to approximately 32nd Street and Bell Road.

This IGA is necessary to obtain right-of-way from ADOT along SR51 near Northern
Avenue and 26th Street for the water transmission mains. As part of this IGA, the City
will maintain the right-of-way within the area of abandonment. There is no direct
financial impact to the City for this agreement.

Location
Along both sides of SR51, near Northern Avenue and 26th Street.
Council District: 3

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.



Page 317



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - Cachet at Peak View - PLAT 200578 - 42nd Street and Peak View Road

Plat: 200578
Project: 18-3908
Name of Plat: Cachet at Peak View
Owner(s): Cachet-Peak View, LLC
Engineer(s): James A. Brucci, RLS
Request: A 23 Lot Residential Plat
Reviewed by Staff: Jan. 14, 2021
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public. This plat needs to record concurrently with resolution of abandonment for
ABND 200527. The sequence of recording to be followed is that the resolution is
recorded first, then the plat is recorded second.

Location
Generally located at 42nd Street and Peak View Road.
Council District: 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 318



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - Lot 1, Aldea Centre - PLAT 200606 - 101st and Montebello Avenues

Plat: 200606
Project: 18-3875
Name of Plat: Lot 1, Aldea Centre
Owner(s): TC Park Aldea Venture, LLC
Engineer(s): David S. Klein, RLS
Request: A 3 Lot Commercial Lot
Reviewed by Staff: Jan. 14, 2021
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located at 101st and Montebello Avenues
Council District: 5

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 319



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - Clarendale Arcadia - PLAT 200574 - 3233 E. Camelback Road

Plat: 200574
Project: 19-93
Name of Plat: Clarendale Arcadia
Owner(s): Lako Limited Partnership
Engineer(s): Jerry L. Dodd Jr., RLS
Request: A 1 Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: Jan. 20, 2021
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public. This plat needs to record concurrently with Abandonment 200559. The
sequence of recording to be followed is that the resolution is recorded first, then the
plat is recorded second.

Location
Located at 3233 E. Camelback Road.
Council District: 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 320



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - 56th Street and Camelback - PLAT 200625 - 5716 and 5728 E.
Camelback Road

Plat: 200625
Project: 19-1919
Name of Plat: 56th Street & Camelback
Owner(s): Duke & Cybele Moscrip
Engineer(s): 3 Engineering, LLC
Request: A 4 Lot Residential Single Family Detached Plat
Reviewed by Staff: Jan. 8, 2021
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
5716 and 5728 E. Camelback Road
Council District: 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 321



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - Hurley Ranch - Phase 1 - PLAT 200553 - Southeast Corner of 91st
Avenue and Illini Street

Plat: 200553
Project: 02-4732
Name of Plat: Hurley Ranch - Phase 1
Owner(s): Meritage Homes of Arizona, Inc.
Engineer(s): EPS Group, Inc.
Request: A 172 Lot Residential Subdivision Plat
Reviewed by Staff: Jan. 19, 2021
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located at the southeast corner of 91st Avenue and Illini Street.
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 322



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - NWC 7th Street and Mohave Street - PLAT 200532 - Northwest Corner
of 7th and Mohave Streets

Plat: 200532
Project: 19-1485
Name of Plat: NWC 7th Street and Mohave Street
Owner(s): SK&M Investments, Inc.
Engineer(s): A.L. Slater, RLS
Request: A 1 Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: Jan. 19, 2021
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located at the northwest corner of 7th and Mohave Streets
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 323



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Abandonment of Right-of-Way - ABND 200527 - Northeast Corner of 42nd Street
and Peak View Road (Resolution 21896)

Abandonment: 200527
Project: 18-3908
Applicant: James A Brucci; Hunter Engineering
Request: To abandon the 30-foot right-of-way easement for the east half of 42nd
Street, recorded on Docket 11709, Page 1033, west of APN 211-38-008K; the 25-foot
right-of-way dedicated for the west half of 42nd Street, per Plat "The Toy Barn on Cave
Creek Road," Book 1018, Page 11, Maricopa County Recorder; the 8-foot public utility
easement and water easement and 20-foot water easement dedicated by Ordinance S
-34573, recording number 2007-1302105, Maricopa County Recorder, on the west
portion of APN 211-38-355.
Date of Hearing: July 9, 2020

Summary
The resolution of the abandonment and the subdivision plat Final Plat for "Cachet at
Peak View", Plat 200578, are to be recorded together with the Maricopa County
recorder on the same day, at the same time. The sequence of recording to be followed
is that the resolution is recorded first, then the plat is recorded second.

Location
Northeast corner of 42nd Street and Peak View Road
Council District: 2

Financial Impact
A fee was also collected as part of this abandonment in the amount of $18,100.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 324



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Abandonment of Right-of-Way - ABND 200559 - Southeast Corner of Camelback
Road and 32nd Street (Resolution 21895)

Abandonment: 200559
Project: 19-93
Applicant(s): Survey Innovation Group, Inc.
Request: To abandon several easements that include sign easement as recorded in
document 1991-165344, Maricopa County Recorder; roadway easement per Book
319, Page 46 of Maricopa County Recorder; 24-foot refuse collection easement and
emergency and service type vehicle easement per Book 319, Page 46 of the Maricopa
County Recorder; and 24-foot refuse collection easement and emergency and service
type vehicle easement per Book 371, Page 43 of the Maricopa County Recorder.
Date of Hearing: Dec. 10, 2020

Summary
The resolution of the abandonment and the commercial plat Final Plat for "Clarendale
Arcadia," Plat 200574, are to be recorded together with the Maricopa County recorder
on the same day, at the same time. The sequence of recording to be followed is that
the resolution is recorded first, then the plat is recorded second.

Location
Southeast corner of Camelback Road and 32nd Street
Council District: 6

Financial Impact
Pursuant to Phoenix City Code Art. 5, Sec. 31-64 (e) as the City acknowledges the
public benefit received by the generation of additional revenue from the private tax
rolls and by the elimination of third-party general liability claims against the city,
maintenance expenses, and undesirable traffic patterns, also replatting of the area
with alternate roadways and new development as sufficient and appropriate
consideration in this matter.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.


Page 325



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Abandonment of Right-of-Way - ABND 200524 - Southwest Corner of 23rd
Avenue and Roeser Road (Resolution 21897)

Abandonment: 200524
Project: 17-430
Applicant: Lennar Arizona, Inc.
Request: To abandon an approximate 575 feet of 23rd Avenue, between Roeser Road,
north alignment and Roeser Road, south alignment, located adjacent to Lindo Park,
addressed 2230 W. Roeser Road, recorded on residential subdivision final plat
"Liberty," recorded with Maricopa County Recorder's office, Book 944, Page 39.
Date of Hearing: June 25, 2020

Summary
The resolution of the abandonment and the subdivision plat, Final Plat For "Liberty
1A", PLAT 200524, are to be recorded together with the Maricopa County recorder on
the same day, at the same time. The sequence of recording to be followed is that the
resolution is recorded first, then the plat is recorded second.

Location
Southwest corner of 23rd Avenue and Roeser Road
Council District: 8

Financial Impact
Pursuant to Phoenix City Code Art. 5, Sec. 31-64 (e) as the City acknowledges the
public benefit received by the generation of additional revenue from the private tax
rolls and by the elimination of third-party general liability claims against the city,
maintenance expenses, and undesirable traffic patterns, also replatting of the area
with alternate roadways and new development as sufficient and appropriate
consideration in this matter.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 326



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Modification of Stipulation Request for Ratification of Jan. 20, 2021 Planning
Hearing Officer Action - PHO-4-20_Z-273-79-5(7) - Approximately 670 Feet South
of the Southeast Corner of 83rd Avenue and Thomas Road

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to approve Planning Hearing
Officer's recommendation without further hearing by the City Council on matters heard
by the Planning Hearing Officer on Jan. 20, 2021. This ratification requires formal
action only.

Summary
Application: PHO-4-20--Z-273-79-5(7)
Existing Zoning: C-2
Acreage: 13.33

Applicant: Adam Baugh, Withey Morris PLC
Owner: Columbia Group LTD
Representative: Adam Baugh, Withey Morris PLC

Proposal:
1. Deletion of Stipulation 1 regarding an overall development plan;
2. Deletion of Stipulation 2 requiring site plan approval;
3. Deletion of Stipulation 3 regarding a landscaping and open space plan, schedule of
intensity, and development schedule;
4. Deletion of Stipulation 4 regarding access to major and collector streets;
5. Deletion of Stipulation 5 regarding a master drainage plan;
6. Deletion of Stipulation 6 regarding improvement costs for Encanto Boulevard;
7. Deletion of Stipulation 1 (ROW) regarding a 55-foot half-street for 83rd Avenue;
8. Deletion of Stipulation 2 (ROW) regarding right-of-way for Thomas Road;
9. Deletion of Stipulation 3 (ROW) regarding a 33-foot half street for Encanto
Boulevard and 79th Avenue;
10.Deletion of Stipulation 4 (ROW) regarding triangles at intersections; and
11.Deletion of Stipulation 5 (ROW) regarding additional right-of-way and a traffic study.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation: The Maryvale Village Planning


Page 327

Committee heard this case on Jan. 13, 2021 and recommended approval with
additional stipulations, by a 8-1-1 vote.
Planning Hearing Officer Recommendation: The Planning Hearing Officer heard this
case on Jan. 20, 2021 and recommended approval with additional stipulations. Please
see Attachment A for a complete list of the Planning Hearing Officer's recommended
stipulations.

Location
Approximately 670 feet south of the southeast corner of 83rd Avenue and Thomas
Road
Council District: 7
Parcel Address: 2627 N. 83rd Ave.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 328
Attachment A- Stipulations- PHO-4-20_Z-273-79-5(7)

Location: Approximately 670 feet south of the southeast corner of 83rd Avenue and
Thomas Road

Stipulations:

**1. That an overall development plan shall be approved by the City
Council showing:

a. The proposed zoning and land use of each parcel;

b. The approximate locations of major and collector streets; and

c. The approximate locations of any public uses such as schools,
drainageways, parks, trails, and other recreational facilities.

2. That all development require site plan approval.

3. That the items listed below be approved in accord with the overall
development plan by the Planning Director at such time as the first
major development occurs on the property:

a. A landscaping and open space plan showing landscaping and screening,
and if provided, other open space such as pathways, parks and trails.

b. A schedule of intensity of use for each parcel of land showing
proposed land uses, maximum and minimum number of dwellings, the gross
leaseable area, and height limits; and

c. A development schedule showing the expected beginning and completion of
construction for each parcel or use.

4. That access to major and collector streets to be as approved by the City
Traffic Engineer.

5. That a master drainage plan be approved by the City Engineer.

6. That the applicant submit acceptable assurances for the assumption of
responsibility for 50 percent of the cost of an improved Encanto Boulevard
between 79th and 83rd Avenue.

a. Construction of Encanto Boulevard shall be the responsibility of the
applicant.

b. Construction of the applicant's or adjacent property owner's (29-80) portion of
Encanto Boulevard shall be concurrent with the first major development of
any parcel abutting Encanto between 79th and 83rd Avenue, but no later
than January 1, 1985.

Right-of-Way Needed

Page 329
Further, sufficient right-of-way to be dedicated by the property owner by July,
1982 to provide for the following:

**1. A 55' half street for 83rd Avenue.

**2. Right-of-way for Thomas Road as shown on Traffic Engineering Department
Drawing No. 2519.

**3. A 33' half street for Encanto Boulevard and 79th Avenue.

**4. Triangles (18' x 18') at 83rd and Thomas Road, 83rd Avenue and Encanto
Boulevard, and 79th Avenue and Encanto Boulevard.

5. Additional right-of-way may be required at the time plans for the use
of this site are submitted and after the review of a traffic study that
will be required of the developer.

**To be complied with prior to vesting of zoning.

1. THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE
SITE PLAN DATE STAMPED DECEMBER 18, 2020 AS MODIFIED BY THE
FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

2. THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE A SHADED PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION
CONSTRUCTED OF STAMPED OR COLORED CONCRETE, OR ANOTHER
MATERIAL OTHER THAN THOSE USED TO PAVE THE PARKING
SURFACES AND DRIVE AISLES, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT. THE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION SHALL BE FROM THE
NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE SITE TO VIRGINIA AVENUE AND INCLUDE
PEDESTRIAN GATES AT BOTH ENDS WITH THE SOUTHERN GATE
LOCATED EAST OF THE DRIVEWAY, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

3. THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK ALONG VIRGINIA AVENUE SHALL BE DETACHED
WITH A MINIMUM 5-FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA LOCATED BETWEEN
THE SIDEWALK AND BACK OF CURB AND PLANTED WITH MINIMUM 2-
INCH CALIPER LARGE CANOPY, SINGLE TRUNK, SHADE TREES PLACED
A MINIMUM OF 20-FEET ON CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT GROUPINGS, AS
APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. AT TREE MATURITY, THE TREES SHALL SHADE THE
SIDEWALK TO A MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT.

4. THE DEVELOPER SHALL REPLENISH THE MEDIAN ISLANDS WITH
MINIMUM 2-INCH CALIPER TREES SPACED 20-FEET ON CENTER AND
SHRUBS TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT LIVE COVERAGE AT
MATURITY FOR THE LENGTH OF THE PROJECT, AS APPROVED OR
MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.



Page 330
5. THE DEVELOPER SHALL DEDICATE A 10-FOOT SIDEWALK EASEMENT
ALONG 83RD AVENUE, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

6. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONDUCT A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT
ANALYSIS TO IDENTIFY THE POTENTIAL NEED FOR SIGNALIZATION OF
83RD AVENUE AND VIRGINIA AVENUE, AS APPROVED BY THE STREET
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT. IF A FUTURE SIGNAL IS IDENTIFIED,
THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE REQUIRED TO CONTRIBUTE 25% OF THE
FUTURE ESTIMATED COST AND TO INSTALL CONDUIT AND JUNCTION
BOXES WITH ANY ASSOCIATED OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS. A SIGNAL
CONDUIT WOULD BE REQUIRED.

7. EXISTING IRRIGATION FACILITIES ALONG VIRGINIA AVENUE ARE TO BE
UNDERGROUNDED AND/OR RELOCATED OUTSIDE OF CITY RIGHT-OF-
WAY. CONTACT SRP TO IDENTIFY EXISTING LAND RIGHTS AND
ESTABLISH APPROPRIATE PROCESS TO RELOCATE FACILITY.
RELOCATIONS THAT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL DEDICATIONS OR LAND
TRANSFER REQUIRE COMPLETION PRIOR TO OBTAINING PLAT AND/OR
CIVIL PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL.

8. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT ALL STREETS WITHIN AND
ADJACENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT WITH PAVING, CURB, GUTTER,
SIDEWALK, CURB RAMPS, STREETLIGHTS, MEDIAN ISLANDS,
LANDSCAPING AND OTHER INCIDENTALS AS PER PLANS APPROVED BY
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. ALL IMPROVEMENTS
SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL ADA ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS.

9. IF DETERMINED NECESSARY BY THE PHOENIX ARCHAEOLOGY OFFICE,
THE APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT PHASE I DATA TESTING AND SUBMIT
AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AREA
FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST PRIOR TO
CLEARING AND GRUBBING, LANDSCAPE SALVAGE, AND/OR GRADING
APPROVAL.

10. IF PHASE I DATA TESTING IS REQUIRED, AND IF, UPON REVIEW OF THE
RESULTS FROM THE PHASE I DATA TESTING, THE CITY
ARCHAEOLOGIST, IN CONSULTATION WITH A QUALIFIED
ARCHAEOLOGIST, DETERMINES SUCH DATA RECOVERY EXCAVATIONS
ARE NECESSARY, THE APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT PHASE II
ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA RECOVERY EXCAVATIONS.

11. IN THE EVENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL MATERIALS ARE ENCOUNTERED
DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE DEVELOPER SHALL IMMEDIATELY CEASE
ALL GROUND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES WITHIN A 33- FOOT RADIUS OF
THE DISCOVERY, NOTIFY THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST, AND ALLOW TIME
FOR THE ARCHAEOLOGY OFFICE TO PROPERLY ASSESS THE
MATERIALS.




Page 331



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application PHO-1-20_Z-43-
13-7 - Northwest Corner of 67th Avenue and Broadway Road (Ordinance G-6809)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to approve the Planning
Hearing Officer's recommendation without further hearing by the City Council on
matters heard by the Planning Hearing Officer on Jan. 20, 2021.

Summary
Application: PHO-1-20_Z-43-13-7
Existing Zoning: C-1
Acreage: 3.13

Applicant: The Carioca Company
Owner: Butterfield Trail, LLC
Representative: Jeff Winter, Esencia LLC

Proposal:
1. Modification of Stipulation 1 regarding general conformance to the site plan date
stamped Aug. 21, 2013.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation: The Estrella Village Planning
Committee heard this case on Jan. 19, 2021 and recommended approval, by a 6-0
vote.
PHO Action: The Planning Hearing Officer heard this case on Jan. 20, 2021 and
recommended approval with additional stipulations. See Attachment A for the full list
of Planning Hearing Officer recommended stipulations.

Location
Northwest corner of 67th Avenue and Broadway Road
Council District: 7
Parcel Address: 6711 W. Broadway Road




Page 332

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 333
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STIPULATIONS APPLICABLE TO
REZONING APPLICATION Z-43-13-7 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY
ORDINANCE G-5879.

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning stipulations applicable located at the northwest

corner of 67th Avenue and Broadway Road in a portion of Section 24, Township 1

North, Range 1 East, as described more specifically in Attachment “A”, are hereby

modified to read as set forth below.

STIPULATIONS:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan
date stamped NOVEMBER 30, 2020 August 21, 2013, as modified by the
following stipulations and approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

2. PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO CONNECT
BUILDING ENTRANCES, PUBLIC SIDEWALKS, BUS STOPS, AND
COMMUNITY AMENITIES, USING THE MOST DIRECT ROUTE FOR
PEDESTRIANS, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

3. WHERE PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS CROSS DRIVE AISLES,
PATHWAYS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DECORATIVE PAVERS,
STAMPED OR COLORED CONCRETE, OR ANOTHER MATERIAL,
OTHER THAN THOSE USED TO PAVE PARKING SURFACES AND
DRIVE AISLES, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.


Page 334
4. THE DEVELOPER SHALL DEDICATE A 30-FOOT WIDE MULTI-USE
TRAIL EASEMENT (MUTE) ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF
BROADWAY ROAD AND CONSTRUCT A MINIMUM 10-FOOT WIDE
MULTI-USE TRAIL (MUT) WITHIN THE EASEMENT IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE MAG SUPPLEMENTAL DETAIL AND AS APPROVED BY
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. WHERE
CONFLICTS OR RESTRICTIONS EXIST, THE DEVELOPER SHALL
WORK WITH THE SITE PLANNING SECTION ON AN ALTERNATE
DESIGN THROUGH THE TECHNICAL APPEAL PROCESS.

5. THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL CONFORM TO THE ESTRELLA VILLAGE
ARTERIAL STREET LANDSCAPING PROGRAM, AS APPROVED BY
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

6. A minimum of 15% open space shall be provided for the residential
2. subdivision, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

7. The maximum number of residential lots shall not exceed 142, as
3. approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. All sidewalks for the residential development shall be detached with a
4. minimum five-foot wide landscaped strip located between the sidewalk
and back of curb and shall include a minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees
planted a minimum of 20 feet on center or equivalent groupings along
both sides of the sidewalk, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. The landscape strip shall be installed by the
developer and maintained by the HOA

9. The perimeter walls adjacent to Broadway Road and 67th Avenue shall
5. include material and textural differences, such as stucco and/or split face
block with a decorative element, such as tile, glass insets, or stamped
designs, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

10. Drive-through facilities shall be located a minimum 100 feet from any
6. residential district, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

11. Pueblo Avenue shall be constructed to connect the subject parcel and
7. the existing adjacent single family neighborhood located to the west, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

12. Right-of-way shall be dedicated and a bus bay detail # P1258
8. constructed southbound on 67th Avenue, south of the proposed
residential entrance to the site, as approved by the Planning and
Development Services Department.

13. Right-of-way shall be dedicated and a bus bay detail # P1256-1
9. constructed west bound on the northwest corner of Broadway Road and



Page 335
67th Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Services
Department.

14. Right-of-way totaling 55 feet shall be dedicated for the north half of
10. Broadway Road, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

15. Right-of-way totaling 55 feet shall be dedicated for the west half of 67th
11. Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

16. A 25-foot by 25-foot right-of-way triangle shall be dedicated at the
12. northwest corner of 67th Avenue and Broadway Road, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

17. The applicant shall relocate all Salt River Project (SRP) irrigation out of
13. right-of-way and into the appropriate easement.

18. The proposed entrance to the subdivision on Broadway Road shall be
14. relocated to the east to be approximately 660 feet east of 69th Lane; this
will also miss the 320KV power pole.

19. The applicant shall complete and submit the Developer Project
15. Information Form for the MAG Transportation Improvement Program to
Mr. Alan Hilty, (602) 262-6193, with the Street Transportation
Department. This form is a requirement of the EPA to meet clean air
quality requirements.

20. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
16. development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals as approved by the
Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

21. IF DETERMINED NECESSARY BY THE PHOENIX ARCHAEOLOGY
OFFICE, THE APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT PHASE I DATA
TESTING AND SUBMIT AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT OF
THE DEVELOPMENT AREA FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE
CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRUBBING,
LANDSCAPE SALVAGE, AND/OR GRADING APPROVAL.

22. IF PHASE I DATA TESTING IS REQUIRED, AND IF, UPON REVIEW
OF THE RESULTS FROM THE PHASE I DATA TESTING, THE CITY
ARCHAEOLOGIST, IN CONSULTATION WITH A QUALIFIED
ARCHAEOLOGIST, DETERMINES SUCH DATA RECOVERY
EXCAVATIONS ARE NECESSARY, THE APPLICANT SHALL
CONDUCT PHASE II ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA RECOVERY
EXCAVATIONS.

23. IN THE EVENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL MATERIALS ARE
ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE DEVELOPER


Page 336
SHALL IMMEDIATELY CEASE ALL GROUND-DISTURBING
ACTIVITIES WITHIN A 33- FOOT RADIUS OF THE DISCOVERY,
NOTIFY THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST, AND ALLOW TIME FOR THE
ARCHAEOLOGY OFFICE TO PROPERLY ASSESS THE MATERIALS.

24. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER
SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS IN A
FORM APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE. THE
WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDER'S OFFICE AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE
INCLUDED IN THE REZONING APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.



SECTION 2. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use district

granted pursuant to Ordinance G-5879, this portion of the rezoning is now subject to the

stipulations approved pursuant to Ordinance G-5879 and as modified in Section 1 of

this Ordinance. Any violation of the stipulation is a violation of the City of Phoenix

Zoning Ordinance. Building permits shall not be issued for the subject site until all the

stipulations have been met.

SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 17th day of February,

2021.




________________________________
MAYOR



ATTEST:


____________________________City Clerk


Page 337
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

____________________________City Attorney



REVIEWED BY:

____________________________City Manager

Exhibits:
A - Legal Description (1 Page)
B - Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 338
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PHO-1-20-- Z-43-13-7

PARCEL NO. 1:
THE SOUTH 350 FEET OF THE EAST 479 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER
OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 1
EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA
CAOUNTY, ARIZONA; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 40 FEET AND THE EAST 40 FEET FOR
ROADWAY PURPOSES.




Page 339
Page 340



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amendment - Rezoning Application Z-49-XX-75-3 - Northwest Corner of Tatum
Boulevard and Cactus Road

Request to approve Rezoning Application Z-49-XX-75-3 per the Planning Commission
recommendation and rezone the site from RSC PCD (Regional Shopping Center,
Planned Community District) to C-2 H-R DNS/WVR SP PCD (Intermediate
Commercial, High-Rise and High Density, Density Waiver, Special Permit, Planned
Community District) for a mix of uses to include retail, office, multifamily, grocer,
distribution, hospitality, medical and a Special Permit for self-storage and all underlying
C-2 uses. This item requires Formal Action only.

Summary
Current Zoning: RSC PCD
Proposed Zoning: C-2 H-R DNS/WVR SP PCD
Acreage: 91.16 acres
Proposed Use: A mix of uses to include retail, office, multifamily, grocer, distribution,
hospitality, medical and a Special Permit for self-storage and all underlying C-2 uses.

Owner: Paradise Valley Mall SPE, LLC, et al
Applicant: Ed Bull, Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.
Representative: Ed Bull, Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee heard the case on Feb.
1, 2021 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a 14-0 vote.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard the case on Feb. 4, 2021 and
recommended approval, per the Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a 8-0 vote.

Location
Northwest corner of Tatum Boulevard and Cactus Road
Parcel Addresses: 4500, 4502, 4520, 4540, 4550, 4554, 4568, 4570, 4604, and 4610
E. Cactus Road; 4515 and 4623 E. Paradise Village Parkway; and 12820 N. Tatum
Blvd.


Page 341

Council District: 3

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 342
Attachment A

Z-49-XX-75-3 (Paradise Valley Planned Community District)

Planning Commission Approved Stipulations:

1. Building heights shall be limited to a maximum of 120 feet, 85 feet, and 30 feet,
as depicted on the Project Building Heights exhibit, date stamped January 5,
2021.

2. Buildings shall have a cohesive design theme throughout the development and
all buildings visible from public streets and private accessways and driveways
shall contain a minimum of three architectural embellishments and detailing
such as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, variation in window size
and location, and/or overhang canopies, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

3. The following frontage types shall be provided for all dwelling units oriented to
the Paradise Valley Mall Loop Road (“loop road”), as approved by the Planning
and Development Department:

a. Individual pedestrian entrance oriented to the loop road and connected
to the public sidewalk by a direct pedestrian pathway.

b. Include a porch or patio, described as follows:

(1) Porches shall have a minimum dimension of six feet in depth by a
width of no less than 50 percent of the total unit; be oriented to the
outer loop road; have a unit entrance; and have a direct pedestrian
connection to the public/private sidewalk.

(2) Patios shall have a minimum dimension of six feet in depth by a
minimum width of 9 feet, and a minimum size of 54 square feet; be
enclosed on each side by a low wall or fence not to exceed 36
inches in height; be oriented to the loop road; have a unit entrance;
and have a direct pedestrian connection to the public/private
sidewalk.

4. Pedestrian circulation shall generally conform to the Conceptual Illustrative
Open Space and Pedestrian Circulation exhibit, date stamped January 13,
2021. Alternative pedestrian pathways may be approved so long as pedestrian
connectivity is provided for the following:

 Relocated transit center
 Library
 Existing and future open space areas


-1-
Page 343
 Public streets

Plans shall show future shading generally contained to pedestrian pathways,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

5. A Master Pedestrian Circulation/Open Space Plan shall be completed prior to
preliminary site plan approval. This master plan shall be updated for each
phase of development, as each new phase is in the city’s development review
process. The Master Pedestrian Circulation/Open Space Plan shall generally
be consistent with the Conceptual Illustrative Open Space and Pedestrian
Circulation exhibit, date stamped January 13, 2021, or future alternative plans,
and include the following features:

 Pedestrian circulation, including at least one primary pedestrian route for
north-south circulation and one for east-west circulation.
 Pavement widths and details
 Shade treatment and calculation
 Locations of detached sidewalks
 Locations of attached sidewalks
 Vehicular roadways
 Open space areas
 Bicycle amenities

6. Open space areas shall conform to Section 1310 of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance. The open space areas shall provide at a minimum decorative
paving, landscaping, shade elements, trash receptacles, art or artistic elements
or seating areas and shall be located at the following locations:

 Northwest corner of Tatum Boulevard and Cactus Road
 South of the southwest corner of Tatum Boulevard and Larkspur Drive
 Northeast corner of Paradise Village Parkway and Cactus Road

7. Bicycle infrastructure shall be provided, as described below and as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Two bicycle repair stations (fix-it stations) shall be provided in areas of
high visibility, convenient pedestrian access, and available from the
public and/or provide sidewalks. The stations shall include standard
repair tools affixed to the station, a tire gauge and pump, and a bicycle
repair stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin freely while making
adjustments to the bike.

One station shall be provided with the first phase of development and
the second station shall be provided with a future phase of development
along the north portion of the loop road, as depicted on the Conceptual
Illustrative Open Space and Pedestrian Circulation exhibit, date stamped


-2-
Page 344
January 13, 2021.

b. Bicycle parking shall be required per Section 1307.H of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance.

c. All required bicycle parking for multifamily use, per Section 1307.H.6.d.
of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, shall be secured parking.

d. Guest bicycle parking for multifamily residential use shall be provided at
a minimum of 0.5 spaces per unit with a maximum of 50 spaces near
entrances of buildings and installed per the requirements of Section
1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.

e. A minimum of 10 percent of the required bicycle parking for
nonresidential uses shall be secured per the requirements of Section
1307.H. of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.

8. All public sidewalks shall be detached with a minimum 5-foot-wide landscape
area located between the sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the
following standards, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the
Planning and Development Department on alternative design solutions with a
pedestrian environment.

Detached sidewalk shall be provided proportionally as redevelopment occurs
adjacent to or within 100 feet of the public right-of-way.

a. Minimum 3-inch caliper large canopy, single-trunk, shade trees placed a
minimum of 25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings to provide a
minimum of 50 percent shade at maturity on all adjacent sidewalks.

b. Drought tolerant shrubs and vegetative groundcovers with a maximum
mature height of 24 inches to provide a minimum of 50 percent live
coverage at maturity.

9. Seasonal shade, sun and temperature regulation through vegetative or
structural shade elements shall be provided for Phase 1 of the development at
the northwest corner of Tatum Boulevard and Cactus Road to allow
pedestrians to enter the site comfortably, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

10. There shall be a minimum of 25 percent structural or vegetative shade at
maturity in the surface parking lots, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

11. The developer shall wrap all newly constructed parking structures visible from



-3-
Page 345
the loop road or any primary pedestrian route (to be identified on the Master
Pedestrian Circulation/Open Space Plan) with other uses such as, street level
retail, office space, or residential dwelling units; or with decorative screening
such as, perforated screening, illuminated art, living greenery, decorative metal
panels or other design features, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

12. Newly constructed walls visible from public streets of the loop road shall
incorporate stone veneer, stonework, integral color CMU block, decorative
block, split face or faux stone, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

13. The self-service storage warehouse use, covered under the Special Permit,
shall comply with the following:

a. Storage buildings shall not exceed three stories or 30 feet in height.

b. Storage buildings shall be limited to an 80,000-square foot footprint, and
not to exceed a 200,000-square foot floor area.

c. Any outdoor storage areas must be screened with a decorative solid
wall.

14. Relocation and/or reconstruction of the Paradise Valley Transit Center is
subject to Planning and Development Department and Public Transit
Department Approval. A minimum of three transit vehicle servicing points shall
be constructed at any relocated or reconstructed site. All plans and designs for
relocated and/or reconstructed transit facilities shall require approval from the
Public Transit Department and the Planning and Development Department.
The Public Transit Department shall retain removable assets located at the
Paradise Valley Transit Center should relocation and/or reconstruction be
approved.

15. Trees or shade structures shall be placed to provide a minimum of 50 percent
shade coverage in pedestrian areas at the transit center.

16. Vehicle access to all public transit facilities shall be ensured by dedication of
transit easements or other legal agreements, as approved by the Public Transit
Department and the Planning and Development Department.

17. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and construct two bus stop pads at
locations approved or modified by the Public Transit Department. Bus stop
pads shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1260
with a minimum depth of 10 feet. Bus stop pads shall be spaced from
intersections according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258. Trees shall
be placed to provide 50 percent shade at bus stop pads, as approved by the



-4-
Page 346
Planning and Development Department.

18. Clearly defined, accessible pedestrian pathways shall be provided to connect
building entrances, bus stop pads, transit center, site amenities, and public
sidewalks, using the most direct route for pedestrians, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

19. Where pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles, they shall be constructed of
decorative pavers, stamped, or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments
that visually contrast with the adjacent parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

20. All cross-access agreements shall include a pedestrian pathway, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

21. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of site plans shall be granted until the
study is reviewed and approved by the City. Contact Mr. Christopher Kowalsky,
Special Projects Administrator, at (602) 534-7105, to set up a meeting to
discuss the requirements of the study. Upon completion of the TIS the
developer shall submit the completed TIS to the Planning and Development
Department counter with instruction to forward the study to the Street
Transportation Department, City Engineers Office. Additional dedications
and/or improvements may be required as per the approved Traffic Impact
Study.

22. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
landscape median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department. All improvements
shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

23. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

24. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.


Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (5 Pages)
B – Major PCD Amendment Map (1 Page)



-5-
Page 347
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-49-XX-75-3

A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN A PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION
18, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST OF THE GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 18 FROM
WHICH THE EAST QUARTER CORNER THEREOF BEARS THENCE NORTH 01
DEGREES 22 MINUTES 04 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2618.84 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 04 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE
EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 18, A DISTANCE OF 268.99 FEET TO A POINT
LYING ON THE RELOCATED MONUMENT LINE OF CACTUS ROAD AS RECORDED
IN DOCKET 12020, PAGE 713, IN DOCKET 12020, PAGE 733, IN DOCKET 12020,
PAGE 747, AND IN DOCKET 12437, PAGE 582, AND ACCORDING TO BOOK 195 OF
MAPS, PAGE 30, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;

THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID
REALIGNED CACTUS ROAD MONUMENT LINE, 832.80 FEET TO A POINT LYING
ON THE MONUMENT LINE OF REALIGNED TATUM BOULEVARD;

THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 69 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST,
ALONG SAID MONUMENT LINE, A DISTANCE OF 719.97 FEET TO THE
BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2291.83 FEET;

THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35
DEGREES 37 MINUTES 05 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 1424.72 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING AND THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, OF
WHICH THE RADIUS POINT LIES SOUTH 15 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 09 SECONDS
EAST, A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 2,291.83 FEET AND HAVING A CHORD BEARING
OF SOUTH 72 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 44 SECONDS WEST, 181.43 FEET; THENCE
WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04 DEGREES 32
MINUTES 13 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 181.48 FEET

THENCE NORTH 29 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
530.39 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE
LEFT, OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT LIES NORTH 29 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 46
SECONDS EAST, A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 540.00 FEET;

THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 42 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF
74.88 FEET;




-6-
Page 348
THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 46 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
354.47 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 15 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
67.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 38,814 SQUARE FEET OR 0.891 ACRES, MORE OR
LESS.

A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN A PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION
18, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST OF THE GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 18 FROM
WHICH THE EAST QUARTER CORNER THEREOF BEARS THENCE NORTH 01
DEGREES 22 MINUTES 04 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2618.84 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 04 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE
EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 18, A DISTANCE OF 268.99 FEET TO A POINT
LYING ON THE RELOCATED MONUMENT LINE OF CACTUS ROAD AS RECORDED
IN DOCKET 12020, PAGE 713, IN DOCKET 12020, PAGE 733, IN DOCKET 12020,
PAGE 747, AND IN DOCKET 12437, PAGE 582, AND ACCORDING TO BOOK 195 OF
MAPS, PAGE 30, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;

THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID
REALIGNED CACTUS ROAD MONUMENT LINE, 832.80 FEET TO A POINT LYING
ON THE MONUMENT LINE OF REALIGNED TATUM BOULEVARD;

THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 69 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST,
ALONG SAID MONUMENT LINE, A DISTANCE OF 193.92 FEET THE POINT OF
BEGINNING OF PARCEL NO. 1;

THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 69 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST,
ALONG SAID MONUMENT LINE, A DISTANCE OF 240.75 FEET TO A POINT
HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT ‘A’;

THENCE NORTH 20 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
212.00 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 10 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 57 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
163.12 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE
LEFT, OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT LIES NORTH 13 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 47
SECONDS WEST, A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 580.00 FEET;




-7-
Page 349
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 02 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 22 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 20.98 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 24 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
431.65 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 20 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
60.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF PARCEL NO. 1.


SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 47,857 SQUARE FEET OR 1.099 AC, MORE OR LESS.

TOGETHER WITH

COMMENCING AT THE AFOREMENTIONED POINT ‘A’;

THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID
REALIGNED CACTUS ROAD MONUMENT LINE, A DISTANCE OF 285.30 FEET TO
THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2291.83
FEET;

THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 28 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF
372.32 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF PARCEL NO. 2 AND THE
BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT LIES
SOUTH 10 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 27 SECONDS WEST, A RADIAL DISTANCE OF
2,291.83 FEET AND HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 82 DEGREES 32
MINUTES 47 SECONDS WEST, 269.50 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE
ARC, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 29 SECONDS,
A DISTANCE OF 269.66 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS
POINT ‘B’;

THENCE NORTH 04 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 58 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
308.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE
LEFT, OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT LIES SOUTH 04 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 58
SECONDS WEST, A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 2,599.84 FEET;

THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 03 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 01 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 142.19
FEET;

THENCE NORTH 03 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
360.58 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
153.99 FEET;



-8-
Page 350
THENCE NORTH 48 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
64.20 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
36.89 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 42 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
8.21 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 48 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
119.38 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
111.17 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 42 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
207.89 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
170.00 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 03 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
421.51 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE
LEFT, OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT LIES SOUTH 17 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 36
SECONDS WEST, A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 2,599.84 FEET;

THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 06 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 09 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 313.96
FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 10 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 27 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
308.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF PARCEL NO. 2.

SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 405,452 SQUARE FEET OR 9.308 AC, MORE OR LESS.

TOGETHER WITH

COMMENCING AT THE AFOREMENTIONED POINT ‘B’ BEING THE BEGINNING OF
A CURVE TO THE LEFT, OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT LIES SOUTH 04
DEGREES 04 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST, A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 2,291.83
FEET AND HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 87 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 44
SECONDS WEST, 558.92 FEET;

THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14
DEGREES 00 MINUTES 28 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 560.32 FEET TO THE



-9-
Page 351
POINT OF BEGINNING OF PARCEL NO. 3 AND THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO
THE LEFT, OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT LIES SOUTH 09 DEGREES 55 MINUTES
30 SECONDS EAST, A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 2,291.83 FEET AND HAVING A
CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 77 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST,
222.35 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 05 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 39 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 222.43 FEET

THENCE NORTH 15 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 09 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
67.00 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 29 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
354.47 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE
LEFT, OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT LIES NORTH 21 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 04
SECONDS EAST, A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 540.00 FEET;

THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 07 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 42 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 67.18 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 47 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 34 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
68.00 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 09 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
260.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF PARCEL NO. 3.

SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 46,679 SQUARE FEET OR 1.072 AC, MORE OR LESS.




-10-
Page 352
-11-




Page 353
$WWDFKPHQW%




Staff Report Z-49-XX-75-3
January 29, 2021

Paradise Valley Village Planning February 1, 2021
Committee Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 4, 2021
Request From: RSC PCD (Regional Shopping Center,
Planned Community District) (91.16
acres)

Request To: C-2 H-R DNS/WVR SP PCD
(Intermediate Commercial, High-Rise
and High Density, Density Waiver,
Special Permit, Planned Community
District) (91.16 acres)

Proposed Use: Major Amendment to the Paradise
Valley PCD to allow a mix of uses
(multifamily and commercial) up to 120
feet in height and a Special Permit for
self-service storage and all underlying
C-2 uses.
Location: Northwest corner of Tatum Boulevard
and Cactus Road

Owner Paradise Valley Mall SPE, LLC

Applicant/Representative: Ed Bull, Burch & Cracchiolo P.A.

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations

General Plan Conformity
Paradise Valley Village Core,
General Plan Land Use Map Designation
Commercial
Varies 55 to 67-foot
Tatum Boulevard Major Arterial
Street Map west half street
Classification Varies 60 to 67-foot
Cactus Boulevard Major Arterial
north half street




Page 354
Staff Report: Z-49-XX-75-3
January 29, 2021



42-foot east and south
Paradise Village Parkway Collector
half street
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; HEALTHY NEIGHBORHOODS; DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Design
neighborhoods and buildings to provide pedestrian access to adjacent
transportation infrastructure such as public transit.
As stipulated, the development is providing pedestrian pathways from all building
entrances to all public streets and adjacent commercial uses in order to provide a
pedestrian friendly environment adjacent to a transit center.

BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES AND SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new
development and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.

The proposed PUD includes shade and landscaping requirements that will promote
walkability and a pleasant pedestrian experience.

CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; CORES, CENTERS &
CORRIDORS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Locate land uses with the greatest height
and most intense uses within village cores, centers and corridors based on
village character, land use needs, and transportation system capacity.

The proposed PUD is located within the Paradise Valley Village core and is promoting
increased height and more intense uses that will connect to the existing and future
infrastructure and will serv those that live and work in the village.

CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND
USE PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity, respectful of
local conditions and surrounding neighborhoods.

The development provides a reasonable level of intensity that is respectful to local
conditions and surrounding neighborhoods. The development will provide an
appropriate transition from the commercially zoned land to the south, east, west and
multifamily residential to the north.



Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives

Tree and Shade Master Plan: See Background Item No. 8 below.

Complete Streets Guiding Principles: See Background Item No. 9 below.




Page 355
Staff Report: Z-49-XX-75-3
January 29, 2021



Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan: See Background Item No. 10 below.

Zero Waste PHX: See Background Item No. 11 below.

Housing Phoenix: See Background Item No. 12 below.


Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning
Land Use Zoning
Paradise Valley Mall (Retail, commercial
On Site services, restaurants, transit center) RSC PCD

North (across
Paradise Village
Multifamily residential PAD-14 PCD
Parkway)

Northwest (across
PCD
Paradise Village
Sweetwater Park (City park) (Approved
Parkway
R1-8 PCD)
Commercial retail, restaurants, commercial
West (abutting) services RSC PCD

West (across
PAD-14
Paradise Village
Multifamily residential, commercial uses PCD, C-2
Parkway)
PCD
Commercial retail, restaurants, commercial
East (across Tatum C-2 PCD,
services
Boulevard) PSC PCD
Commercial retail, restaurants, commercial
East (abutting) services RSC PCD

Restaurant Pads
South (abutting) RSC PCD
Commercial retail, restaurants, commercial
South (across
services C-2 PCD
Cactus Road)




Page 356
Staff Report: Z-49-XX-75-3
January 29, 2021



Background/Issues/Analysis

SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone approximately 91.16 acres on the northwest corner of
Tatum Boulevard and Cactus Road from RSC PCD (Regional Shopping Center,
Planned Community District) to C-2 H-R DNS/WVR SP PCD (Intermediate
Commercial, High-Rise and High Density, Density Waiver, Special Permit, Planned
Community District) for a major amendment to the Village of Paradise Valley
Planned Community District to allow a mix of uses (multifamily and commercial) up
to 120 feet in height and a Special Permit for self-service storage and all underlying
C-2 uses. The site is currently developed with a regional shopping mall. The
existing mall will be redeveloped into a mixed-use development.

The H-R (High-Rise and High Density District) zoning is requested to allow building
heights greater than four stories or 56 feet, as allowed in village cores. The H-R
district allows up to 250 feet in height, however the applicant has provided a
building height exhibit that restricts the building heights to 120, 85, and 30 feet, as
depicted on the Project Building Heights plan. Further detail on the building heights
is provided in Background Item No. 5.

The density waiver is requested to allow dwelling unit density up to the R-5 zoning
district standards. The underlying zoning for this proposal is C-2. This district allows
a density as set forth in the R-3 zoning district standards (14.5, up to 17.4 dwelling
units per acre). A density waiver allows a density as set forth in the R-5 zoning
district standards (43.5, up to 52.2 dwelling units per acre). Development on the site
also will have the option of utilizing the density standards afforded by the C-2 HR
district when development proposed on a site plan exceeds 4 stories or 56 feet in
building height.

In an effort to limit the size of the self-storage use on the overall site, staff is
recommending Stipulation No. 13, which limits the size of the use.

Development standards for the zoning area will vary based on scope, building
height and use as outlined in the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.

The subject site consists of several parcels that are under the ownerships of
Paradise Valley Mall SPE LLC, Dillard’s Properties, Inc., DSS Uniter, LLC., and
Macy’s Department Stores, Inc. The site currently contains a regional shopping mall
with surface parking, a parking structure as well as several out parcels that consist
of a transit center and open space areas. The subject site was annexed into the
surrounding area vastly consisted of vacant land. This area was planned in 1975 as
a Planned Community District (PCD) of 1,222 acres, known as The Village of
Paradise Valley PCD, through Rezoning Case No. Z-49-75. Subsequently, The




Page 357
Staff Report: Z-49-XX-75-3
January 29, 2021



Village of Paradise Valley PCD went through several amendments since its original
approval. However, these amendments did not affect the subject site. The current
RSC PCD zoning designation was established through the original rezoning case,
Rezoning Case No. Z-49-75 on July 22, 1975. Maricopa County Historical Aerials
indicate that the subject site began development prior to 1979. The PCD Zoning
District is intended to establish a development pattern for a larger area while
permitting flexibility for specific developments and safeguards that adequate
infrastructure needs are met for the area. The proposed rezoning on the site
proposes the site remain in the PCD. The developer will be required to provide
updated infrastructure as needed and determined through the Planning and
Development Department’s site development process.




Figure A: Historic Aerials, Source: Maricopa County Assessor’s Office


2. The rezoning area consists of the majority of the Paradise Valley Mall, which
opened in the late 1970s. In addition, the site contains existing dedicated open
space areas located on the perimeter. Staff is recommending all open space areas
contain decorative paving, landscaping, shade elements, trash receptacles art,
artistic elements or seating areas. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 6. The site
also contains existing retail, restaurants, and a transit facility which will be relocated
on site.




Page 358
Staff Report: Z-49-XX-75-3
January 29, 2021




Figure B: Conceptual Site Plan, Source: Nelson Partners




Page 359
Staff Report: Z-49-XX-75-3
January 29, 2021



SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
3. The graphic to the right
illustrates the pattern of
surrounding land uses
and zoning entitlements.
To the north are several
multifamily
developments zoned
PAD-14. To the
northwest and west are
properties zoned PCD
(approved R1-8), PAD-
14, C-2 PCD and RSC
PCD developed with a
city park, multifamily
residential and various
commercial uses. To
the south of the site are
properties zoned RSC
PCD and C-2 PCD
developed with various Figure C: Surrounding land uses, Source: City of Phoenix Planning
commercial uses. To and Development Department
the east are properties
zoned PSC PCD and C-2 PCD
developed with various commercial uses.




Page 360
Staff Report: Z-49-XX-75-3
January 29, 2021



GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATIONS
4. The General Plan Land Use
Map designation for the
subject site is Commercial.
The proposed use is
consistent with the
designation.

The Commercial designation
also applies to all adjacent
land to the south, southwest
and east.

The land to the north and
northwest of the subject site
is designated Residential
15+ dwelling units per acre,
the city park to the
northwest is designated
Parks/OpenSpace – Publicly
Owned.

Figure D: General Plan Land Use Map, Source: City of Phoenix
Planning and Development Department

PROPOSAL
5. Overall Site Plan
The applicant is proposing a multiphase development encompassing the majority of
the existing Paradise Valley mall site. Phase 1, generally located in the southeast
quadrant of the mall area, is the only phase that has been detailed with this
rezoning application. Future phases will need to comply with the general zoning
district standards as well as, the recommended stipulations which will apply to the
full rezoning area.




Page 361
Staff Report: Z-49-XX-75-3
January 29, 2021




Figure E: Phase 1 Conceptual Site Plan,
Source: Nelson Partners



The following analysis pertains to the Phase 1 portion of the conceptual site plan
which consists of a multifamily development, specialty grocery store and retail
space as depicted in the Figure E above.

The conceptual site plan depicts the following:
x A multifamily building of approximately 301,861 square feet under roof and a
total of 347 dwelling units.
x The parking structure for the proposed multifamily shows a wrapped parking
structure.
x A commercial space comprised of restaurant/retail space totaling 7,882
square feet and a grocery store totaling 45,000 square feet.

Staff is recommending all dwelling units oriented to the loop road have individual
pedestrian entrances, be connected to sidewalks, and have a front porch or patio
as recommended in Stipulation No. 3.

There is a significant amount of existing and proposed open space on the site as
reflected on the Conceptual Illustrative Open Space and Pedestrian Circulation
exhibit. This is appropriate in a village core; therefore, staff is recommending
Stipulation No. 6 to ensure the open space area are retained as an amenity and for




Page 362
Staff Report: Z-49-XX-75-3
January 29, 2021



an enhanced aesthetic quality in the area.

Staff is recommending that all newly constructed parking structures be wrapped
with other uses or decorative elements in an effort to provide an aesthetically
pleasing environment. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 11.

Additionally, staff is recommending that all surface parking lots be shaded by 25
percent and all newly constructed walls visible from public or private accessways
incorporate various design elements. These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 10
and 12.

To provide a transition of height, building heights will be limited to 120 feet for the
area on the interior of the loop road, 85 feet for the area in green located on the
northeast portion of the site outside of the loop road, and 30 feet for a pad along
Tatum Boulevard and a pad along Cactus Road, as depicted on the Project Building
Heights exhibit, date stamped January 5, 2021 and as shown in Figure F below.
The gray areas depicted in Figure F will remain as open space, a fuel station, and
existing parking lot areas. To ensure building heights will remain as proposed staff
is recommending Stipulation No. 1.




Figure F: Project Building Heights, Source: Nelson Partners




Page 363
Staff Report: Z-49-XX-75-3
January 29, 2021




6. Elevations
The Phase 1
development proposal
includes conceptual
elevations that depict a
ground level specialty
grocery store and
multifamily living units
above. Staff is
recommending
Stipulation No. 2 to
ensure the buildings
have a cohesive design
theme and ensure that
elevations contain
variations in materials,
colors, and textures.
Examples of these
variations are depicted
in Figure G to the right.




Figure G: Conceptual Renderings, Source: Nelson Partners

7. Pedestrian Circulation
The proposed Conceptual Illustrative Open Space and Pedestrian Circulation
exhibit, date stamped January 13, 2021 and shown in Figure H below depicts
pedestrian connectivity to and from the relocated transit facility, Mesquite Branch
Library, dedicated open space areas, future open space areas and Sweetwater
Park. Staff is recommending Stipulation No. 4 to ensure the proposed connectivity
throughout the site is achieved. The pedestrian pathways will be provided in phases
as the site develops.




Page 364
Staff Report: Z-49-XX-75-3
January 29, 2021




Figure H: Conceptual Illustrative Open Space and Pedestrian Circulation,
Source: Nelson Partners


STUDIES AND POLICIES
8. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan encourages treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure the trees are an integral part of the City’s planning and
development process. Sidewalks on the street frontages should include trees to be
planted on both sides of the sidewalk to provide thermal comfort for pedestrians
and to reduce the urban heat island effect.

Staff is recommending several stipulations regarding tree plantings and shaded
pedestrian pathways for increased thermal comfort. These are addressed in
Stipulation Nos. 8, 9, 10 and 15.

9. Complete Streets Guiding Principles
In 2014, the City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding
Principles. The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an
accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such as
bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles.

In addition to the shaded sidewalks and parking areas (Stipulation Nos. 8 and 9),




Page 365
Staff Report: Z-49-XX-75-3
January 29, 2021



staff is recommending a Stipulation No. 7 to require bicycle parking and amenity
standards as outlined in Section 1307 in the Walkable Urban Code.

10. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
The Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
supports options for both short-and long-term
bicycle parking as a means of promoting bicyclist
traffic to a variety of destinations. The proposal
requires bicycle parking spaces be provided on
the site. Bicycle repair stations (“fix it stations”)
shall be provided in areas of high visibility,
convenient pedestrian access, and available
from the public and/or provide sidewalks. Bicycle
parking for multifamily uses shall be installed per
the requirements of Section 1307.H. In additional, a Bike Fix It Station, Source: Dero
minimum of 10 percent of the required bicycle
parking for nonresidential uses shall be secured per the requirements of Section
1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. These are outlined in Stipulation No. 7.

11. Zero Waste PHX
The city of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal to
become a zero waste city, as part of the city’s overall 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and
expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs.

Section 716 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance establishes standards to encourage
the provision of recycling containers for multifamily, commercial and mixed-use
developments meeting certain criteria. The provision of recycling containers was
not addressed in the applicant’s submittals.

12. Housing Phoenix Plan
In June 2020, the Phoenix City Council approved the Housing Phoenix Plan. This
Plan contains policy initiatives for the development and preservation of housing with
a vision of creating a stronger and more vibrant Phoenix through increased housing
options for residents at all income levels and family sizes. Phoenix’s rapid
population growth and housing underproduction has led to a need for over 163,000
new housing units. Current shortages of housing supply relative to demand are a
primary reason why housing costs are increasing. The proposed development
supports the Plan’s goal of preserving or creating 50,000 housing units by 2030 by
contributing to a variety housing types that will address the supply shortage at a
more rapid pace while using vacant land in a more sustainable fashion.




Page 366
Staff Report: Z-49-XX-75-3
January 29, 2021



COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
13. Staff has received two letters of opposition and five letters of support at the time this
staff report was written. Copies of the correspondence is attached to this report.
Community concerns include:

x Proposed height, should not be more than two stories
x Density
x Increased traffic
x Self-storage use
x Multifamily uses
x Increase in crime in the area
x Low income housing
x Property values decreasing

INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
14. The Street Transportation Department requested the developer provide a
pedestrian circulation plan for the rezoning area specifically detailing access to
existing and planned transit facilities, Sweetwater Park and the Mesquite Library.
Further, the pedestrian circulation plan should consider detached and shaded
sidewalks to support the mixed us concept and to conform to the City of Phoenix
Complete Streets policy. This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 4 and 5.

The Street Transportation Department also requested that the applicant submit a
Traffic Impact Study to the City for this development and construct all streets within
and adjacent to the development with all required elements to ADA standards. This
is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 21 and 22.

15. The City of Phoenix Floodplain Management Division of the Public Works
Department has determined that this parcel is not in a special flood hazard area
(SFHA), but located in a Shaded Zone X, on panel 1755 L of the Flood Insurance
Rate Maps (FIRM) dated October 16, 2013.

16. The Public Transit Department has determined that if the developer relocate and/or
relocate the Paradise Valley Transit Center, a minimum of three transit vehicle
servicing points shall be incorporated within the design and a minimum of 50
percent shade shall be provided at the transit center. Furthermore, dedication of
transit easements or other legal agreements shall be implemented to ensure
vehicle access to all public transit facilities. These are addressed in Stipulation Nos.
14 through 16.

The Public Transit Department requested the developer dedicate right-of-way and
construct two bus stop pads at locations approved by the Public transit Department.
Further, the developer shall provide clearly defined, accessible pedestrian




Page 367
Staff Report: Z-49-XX-75-3
January 29, 2021



pathways connecting building entrances, bust stop pads, transit centers, site
amenities and public sidewalks using the most direct route possible. Pedestrian
pathways crossing drive aisles and parking area crossings shall be constructed of
decorative pavement that visually contrasts with the adjacent parking and drive
aisle surfaces. Additionally, all cross-access agreements shall include a pedestrian
pathway. These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 17 through 20.

17. The Fire Prevention division of the Fire Department does not anticipate any issues
with this request. The site or/and building(s) shall comply with the Phoenix Fire
Code. However, the water supply to this site is unknown. Additional water supply
may be required to meet the required fire flow per the Phoenix Fire Code.

18. The Water Services Department indicated that no zoning stipulations are required;
however, commented that capacity is a dynamic condition that can change over
time due to a variety of factors. The requirements and assurances for water and
sewer service are determined during the site plan application review. For any given
property, water and sewer requirements may vary over time to be less or more
restrictive depending on the status of the City’s water and sewer infrastructure.

OTHER
19. The site has not been identified as being archaeologically sensitive. However, in the
event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, all ground
disturbing activities must cease within 33-feet of the discovery and the City of
Phoenix Archaeology Office must be notified immediately and allowed time to
properly assess the materials. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 23.

20. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and ordinances.
Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements. Other formal
actions such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and abandonment me be
required.

Findings

1. The proposed development will revitalize a prominent site within a village core.

2. The proposed zoning will allow for additional housing units to be built which will
help alleviate the housing shortage in Phoenix and advance the goals of the
Housing Phoenix Plan.

3. The proposed developments scale and intensity is appropriate given the location
within the Paradise Valley Village Core, at the intersection of major arterials and
at a location served by existing transit.




Page 368
Staff Report: Z-49-XX-75-3
January 29, 2021




Stipulations

1. Building heights shall be limited to a maximum of 120 feet, 85 feet, and 30 feet,
as depicted on the Project Building Heights exhibit, date stamped January 5,
2021.

2. Buildings shall have a cohesive design theme throughout the development and
all buildings visible from public streets and private accessways and driveways
shall contain a minimum of three architectural embellishments and detailing
such as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, variation in window size
and location, and/or overhang canopies, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

3. The following frontage types shall be provided for all dwelling units oriented to
the Paradise Valley Mall Loop Road (“loop road”), as approved by the Planning
and Development Department:

a. Individual pedestrian entrance oriented to the loop road and connected
to the public sidewalk by a direct pedestrian pathway.

b. Include a porch or patio, described as follows:

(1) Porches shall have a minimum dimension of six feet in depth by a
width of no less than 50 percent of the total unit; be oriented to the
outer loop road; have a unit entrance; and have a direct pedestrian
connection to the public/private sidewalk.

(2) Patios shall have a minimum dimension of six feet in depth by a
minimum width of 9 feet, and a minimum size of 54 square feet; be
enclosed on each side by a low wall or fence not to exceed 36
inches in height; be oriented to the loop road; have a unit entrance;
and have a direct pedestrian connection to the public/private
sidewalk.

4. Pedestrian circulation shall generally conform to the Conceptual Illustrative
Open Space and Pedestrian Circulation exhibit, date stamped January 13,
2021. Alternative pedestrian pathways may be approved so long as pedestrian
connectivity is provided for the following:

x Relocated transit center
x Library
x Existing and future open space areas
x Public streets



Page 369
Staff Report: Z-49-XX-75-3
January 29, 2021




Plans shall show future shading generally contained to pedestrian pathways,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

5. A Master Pedestrian Circulation/Open Space Plan shall be completed prior to
preliminary site plan approval. This master plan shall be updated for each
phase of development, as each new phase is in the city’s development review
process. The Master Pedestrian Circulation/Open Space Plan shall generally
be consistent with the Conceptual Illustrative Open Space and Pedestrian
Circulation exhibit, date stamped January 13, 2021, or future alternative plans,
and include the following features:

x Pedestrian circulation, including at least one primary pedestrian route for
north-south circulation and one for east-west circulation.
x Pavement widths and details
x Shade treatment and calculation
x Locations of detached sidewalks
x Locations of attached sidewalks
x Vehicular roadways
x Open space areas
x Bicycle amenities

6. Open space areas shall conform to Section 1310 of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance. The open space areas shall provide at a minimum decorative
paving, landscaping, shade elements, trash receptacles, art or artistic elements
or seating areas and shall be located at the following locations:

x Northwest corner of Tatum Boulevard and Cactus Road
x South of the southwest corner of Tatum Boulevard and Larkspur Drive
x Northeast corner of Paradise Village Parkway and Cactus Road

7. Bicycle infrastructure shall be provided, as described below and as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Two bicycle repair stations (fix-it stations) shall be provided in areas of
high visibility, convenient pedestrian access, and available from the
public and/or provide sidewalks. The stations shall include standard
repair tools affixed to the station, a tire gauge and pump, and a bicycle
repair stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin freely while making
adjustments to the bike.

One station shall be provided with the first phase of development and
the second station shall be provided with a future phase of development




Page 370
Staff Report: Z-49-XX-75-3
January 29, 2021



along the north portion of the loop road, as depicted on the Conceptual
Illustrative Open Space and Pedestrian Circulation exhibit, date stamped
January 13, 2021.

b. Bicycle parking shall be required per Section 1307.H of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance.

c. All required bicycle parking for multifamily use, per Section 1307.H.6.d.
of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, shall be secured parking.

d. Guest bicycle parking for multifamily residential use shall be provided at
a minimum of 0.5 spaces per unit with a maximum of 50 spaces near
entrances of buildings and installed per the requirements of Section
1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.

e. A minimum of 10 percent of the required bicycle parking for
nonresidential uses shall be secured per the requirements of Section
1307.H. of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.

8. All public sidewalks shall be detached with a minimum 5-foot-wide landscape
area located between the sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the
following standards, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the
Planning and Development Department on alternative design solutions with a
pedestrian environment.

Detached sidewalk shall be provided proportionally as redevelopment occurs
adjacent to or within 100 feet of the public right-of-way.

a. Minimum 3-inch caliper large canopy, single-trunk, shade trees placed a
minimum of 25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings to provide a
minimum of 50 percent shade at maturity on all adjacent sidewalks.

b. Drought tolerant shrubs and vegetative groundcovers with a maximum
mature height of 24 inches to provide a minimum of 50 percent live
coverage at maturity.

9. Seasonal shade, sun and temperature regulation through vegetative or
structural shade elements shall be provided for Phase 1 of the development at
the northwest corner of Tatum Boulevard and Cactus Road to allow
pedestrians to enter the site comfortably, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

10. There shall be a minimum of 25 percent structural or vegetative shade at




Page 371
Staff Report: Z-49-XX-75-3
January 29, 2021



maturity in the surface parking lots, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

11. The developer shall wrap all newly constructed parking structures visible from
the loop road or any primary pedestrian route (to be identified on the Master
Pedestrian Circulation/Open Space Plan) with other uses such as, street level
retail, office space, or residential dwelling units; or with decorative screening
such as, perforated screening, illuminated art, living greenery, decorative metal
panels or other design features, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

12. Newly constructed walls visible from public streets of the loop road shall
incorporate stone veneer, stonework, integral color CMU block, decorative
block, split face or faux stone, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

13. The self-service storage warehouse use, covered under the Special Permit,
shall comply with the following:

a. Storage buildings shall not exceed three stories or 30 feet in height.

b. Storage buildings shall be limited to an 80,000-square foot footprint, and
not to exceed a 200,000-square foot floor area.

c. Any outdoor storage areas must be screened with a decorative solid
wall.

14. Relocation and/or reconstruction of the Paradise Valley Transit Center is
subject to Planning and Development Department and Public Transit
Department Approval. A minimum of three transit vehicle servicing points shall
be constructed at any relocated or reconstructed site. All plans and designs for
relocated and/or reconstructed transit facilities shall require approval from the
Public Transit Department and the Planning and Development Department.
The Public Transit Department shall retain removable assets located at the
Paradise Valley Transit Center should relocation and/or reconstruction be
approved.

15. Trees or shade structures shall be placed to provide a minimum of 50 percent
shade coverage in pedestrian areas at the transit center.

16. Vehicle access to all public transit facilities shall be ensured by dedication of
transit easements or other legal agreements, as approved by the Public Transit
Department and the Planning and Development Department.




Page 372
Staff Report: Z-49-XX-75-3
January 29, 2021



17. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and construct two bus stop pads at
locations approved or modified by the Public Transit Department. Bus stop
pads shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1260
with a minimum depth of 10 feet. Bus stop pads shall be spaced from
intersections according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258. Trees shall
be placed to provide 50 percent shade at bus stop pads, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

18. Clearly defined, accessible pedestrian pathways shall be provided to connect
building entrances, bus stop pads, transit center, site amenities, and public
sidewalks, using the most direct route for pedestrians, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

19. Where pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles, they shall be constructed of
decorative pavers, stamped, or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments
that visually contrast with the adjacent parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

20. All cross-access agreements shall include a pedestrian pathway, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

21. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of site plans shall be granted until the
study is reviewed and approved by the City. Contact Mr. Christopher Kowalsky,
Special Projects Administrator, at (602) 534-7105, to set up a meeting to
discuss the requirements of the study. Upon completion of the TIS the
developer shall submit the completed TIS to the Planning and Development
Department counter with instruction to forward the study to the Street
Transportation Department, City Engineers Office. Additional dedications
and/or improvements may be required as per the approved Traffic Impact
Study.

22. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
landscape median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department. All improvements
shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

23. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.




Page 373
Staff Report: Z-49-XX-75-3
January 29, 2021




Writer
David Simmons
January 29, 2021

Team Leader
Samantha Keating

Exhibits
Zoning Sketch Map
Aerial Sketch Map
Community Correspondence (8 pages)
Conceptual Site Plan, date stamped January 5, 2021
Conceptual Renderings, date stamped November 23, 2020
Project Building Heights, date stamped January 5, 2021
Conceptual Illustrative Open Space and Pedestrian Circulation, date stamped
January 13, 2021




Page 374

46TH ST
R1-8
45TH ST
ANDORA DR
R-5
49TH ST
42ND ST
PCD * PCD *
44TH ST
Z-49-B-75 PERSHING AVE Z-49-C-75
R1-10
48TH PL
PCD *
PCD * PAD-14 Z-49-B-75
Z-49-75 PCD * SURREY AVE
Z-49-75
R1-6 R1-8
PCD *
Z-49-75 C-2
R1-8 Z-49-B-75 PCD *
C/Z-49-FF-75




DAHLIA DR
PAD-14
PCD * LVD
MB
Z-49-75 C-2
DR TAT PCD *
R OSE U
WIN D
RSC Z-49-FF-75

O *
PCD * Z-49-QQ-75
C- CD-75 Y
Z-49-NN-75
PKW
P -49
Z

C-2 GE

LLA
PCD *
E VI
R-5
PCD * Z-49-AA-75
Z-49-U-75
DI S
A PSC
PAR C-3
48TH ST
PCD *
PCD *
R-5 * Z-49-B-75
PCD Z-49-PP-75
Z-49-75
Z-7-12
C-2 Z-49-BB-75
PCD *
Z-49-75 CA
C-2
49TH PL
CT
C/Z-49-JJ-75 C-O US
RD PCD *
PAD-15 PCD * Z-49-FF-75
Z-109-01
PCD * DR
R1-14 Z-49-J-75 C-O T TE
R-4A PAD-14 PCD * BU
SP PCD *
Z-49-B-75
PCD* PCD *
Z-49-75 AW
C-2
Z-49-B-75 H
Z-49-R-75 S PCD * PCD
R1-18 Z-49-TT-75
SP PCD * PAD-15 Z-49-75 *
Z-49-B-75 PCD *
Z-49-II-75 Z-49-K-75




I
DEER VALLEY DR

SR 101 Z-49-XX-75
UNION HILLS DR
Miles



A W P EA K PKWY (SR 51)
BELL RD
0.1 0.05 0 0.1 GREENWAY RD

PARADISE VILLAGE THUNDERBIRD RD

CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3 CACTUS RD




SCOTTSDALE RD
SHEA BLVD
QU

16TH ST 56TH ST 64TH ST
24TH ST S

TATUM BLVD
32ND ST
40TH ST




APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Ed Bull, Burch & Cracchiolo P.A.
FROM:
RSC PCD ( 91.16 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
12/07/2020
Z-49-XX-75 REVISION DATES:

12/29/2020 1/07/2021 1/11/2021
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
91.16 Acres QS 31-37, QS 32-37
K-10, K-11 TO: C-2 H-R DNS/WVR SP PCD ( 91.16 a.c.)
QS 31-38, QS 32-38
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
RSC PCD N/A N/A
C-2 H-R DNS/WVR SP PCD 13,236 4,758

* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Page 375
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\1975\Z-49-XX-75.mxd

46TH ST
R1-8
45TH ST
ANDORA DR
R-5
49TH ST
42ND ST
PCD * PCD *
44TH ST
Z-49-B-75 PERSHING AVE Z-49-C-75
R1-10
48TH PL
PCD *
PCD * PAD-14 Z-49-B-75
Z-49-75 PCD * SURREY AVE
Z-49-75
R1-6 R1-8
PCD *
Z-49-75 C-2
R1-8 Z-49-B-75 PCD *
C/Z-49-FF-75




DAHLIA DR
PAD-14
PCD * LVD
MB
Z-49-75 C-2
DR TAT PCD *
R OSE U
WIN D
RSC Z-49-FF-75

O *
PCD * Z-49-QQ-75
C- CD-75 Y
Z-49-NN-75
PKW
P -49
Z

C-2 GE

LLA
PCD *
E VI
R-5
PCD * Z-49-AA-75
Z-49-U-75
DI S
A PSC
PAR C-3
48TH ST
PCD *
PCD *
R-5 * Z-49-B-75
PCD Z-49-PP-75
Z-49-75
Z-7-12
C-2 Z-49-BB-75
PCD *
Z-49-75 CA
C-2
49TH PL
CT
C/Z-49-JJ-75 C-O US
RD PCD *
PAD-15 PCD * Z-49-FF-75
Z-109-01
PCD * DR
R1-14 Z-49-J-75 C-O T TE
R-4A PAD-14 PCD * BU
SP PCD *
Z-49-B-75
PCD* PCD *
Z-49-75 AW
C-2
Z-49-B-75 H
Z-49-R-75 S PCD * PCD
R1-18 Z-49-TT-75
SP PCD * PAD-15 Z-49-75 *
Z-49-B-75 PCD * Maricopa County Assessor's Office
Z-49-II-75 Z-49-K-75




I
DEER VALLEY DR

SR 101 Z-49-XX-75
UNION HILLS DR
Miles



A W P EA K PKWY (SR 51)
BELL RD
0.1 0.05 0 0.1 GREENWAY RD

PARADISE VILLAGE THUNDERBIRD RD

CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3 CACTUS RD




SCOTTSDALE RD
SHEA BLVD
QU

16TH ST 56TH ST 64TH ST
24TH ST S

TATUM BLVD
32ND ST
40TH ST




APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Ed Bull, Burch & Cracchiolo P.A.
FROM:
RSC PCD ( 91.16 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
12/07/2020
Z-49-XX-75 REVISION DATES:

12/29/2020 1/07/2021 1/11/2021
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
91.16 Acres QS 31-37, QS 32-37
K-10, K-11 TO: C-2 H-R DNS/WVR SP PCD ( 91.16 a.c.)
QS 31-38, QS 32-38
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
RSC PCD N/A N/A
C-2 H-R DNS/WVR SP PCD 13,236 4,758

* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Page 376
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\1975\Z-49-XX-75.mxd
David O Simmons

From: From the desk of Jessica Lacy
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2020 8:36 AM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: PV Mall Devlopment


Mr. Simmons, hello,

I am writing to you today to voice my concerns over the proposed PV Mall redevelopment. I am deeply concerned
about the height of the project, as well as the number of housing units that are planned.

I represent the concerns of many residents in this area.

Sincerely,

Caroline Lacy.





Page 377
David O Simmons

From: Lucinda Walters Naia
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2021 8:46 PM
To: David O Simmons; ebull@bcattorneys.com
Subject: NO self storage at PV Mall Redevelopment


There's zero need for self storage in that area. Self storage facilities exist right down the street at Shea and 32nd St. It's a
huge monstrously lit ugly building

I'll do whatever it takes to fight the rezoning... starting now





Page 378
David O Simmons

From: James Ashley
Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2021 6:19 PM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: PV Mall redevelopment


Mr. Simmons,
It is great news that the redevelopment of Paradise Valley Mall will be taking place soon!
I had a question about the apartments and condos that will be built on the site. From the architectural drawings I’ve
seen, they appear to be very generic looking, even the ones above the planned grocery store. There are multi-family
buildings in Phoenix at Kierland and near Scottsdale Fashion Square that have a great environmentally friendly feature.
They are environmentally oriented with plants on the outside of the building, balconies, and trees on the rooftops.
Similar to the projects in Kierland or near Highland and Scottsdale Road it would definitely add a “green” element to the
project and make it really stand out as compared to just another apartment complex to look like every other one. This
would really beautify the new development and the heart of PV Village and be eco-friendly.
Is this something the city would consider advocating to the developers or the planning commission?
I’ve attached a couple photos of the buildings at Kierland and further south along Scottsdale Road and Camelback for
reference (even though a couple of these are larger than what I believe is proposed).
Thank you,
James Ashley
602-708-0075





Page 379

Page 380
David O Simmons

From: Kate Birchler
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 12:46 PM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Support of Paradise Valley Mall Redevelopment: Z-49-XX-75-3


Dear Mr. Simmons,
Please make my comment known on case Z-49-XX-75-3 - I am in full support of Macerich and RED Development
moving forward with their plans for the redevelopment of Paradise Valley Mall.

Kind Regards,
Kate Birchler





Page 381
David O Simmons

From: Chong Kestner
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 11:46 AM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Case:Z-49-XX-75-3



Please accept my formal comment regarding the case: Z-49-XX-75-3. I am in full support of Macerich and RED
Development moving forward with plans for the redevelopment of Paradise Valley Mall. This will be an
amazing initiative to restore the mall and brighten our community economically. Paradise Valley is a beautiful
community and we hope to continue seeing it's growth.

Thank you,

Tyler and Chong Kestner





Page 382
David O Simmons

From: Summer Oliver
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 10:38 AM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Paradise Valley Mall


Please accept my formal comment regarding case: Z-49-XX-75-3. I am in full support of Macerich and RED Development
moving forward with their plans for the redevelopment of Paradise Valley Mall. This area needs revitalization and will be
positive for the entire community. There have been talks for years on what is going on with the space and it's great to
see some movement.

Summer Oliver





Page 383
David O Simmons

From: Sabrina Jordan
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 10:24 AM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Paradise Valley Mall Redevelopment


Case# Z-49-XX-75-3

I totally support Macerich and RED Development moving forward with their plans for redevelopment of Paradise Valley
Mall! Both of these developers have an excellent reputation and will certainly bring back the mall to it’s former glory!

I am a Phoenician and have resided in this neighborhood for over twenty years. Things evolve over time and all that live
here want to give “our mall” the attention it deserves.

Their plans will renew Paradise Valley Mall to a new level and I am so looking forward to it!

Along with that, it will pump new money into this area. This is prime real estate that needs revamping.

As a neighbor, I can’t wait to enjoy this mall in a new way! I have shopped here since it was built. Opportunity is with us!
Let’s take it and give the Paradise Valley and north Phoenix a new mall that they will continue cherish for years to come!

Thank you for your continued vision for the Paradise Valley Village area. We so appreciate your support on this!

Sincerely,

Sabrina Jordan
18652 N. 44th Place
Phoenix, AZ 85050

Phone (602) 570-8004





Page 384
PROJECT INFORMATION
CURRENT ZONING: RSC
PROPOSED ZONING: PCD Amendment,
C-2, HR, Density
Waiver & Special
Permit for Self
Storage
PARCELS IN SCOPE: 167-25-003C
167-25-003L
167-25-003M PRELIMINARY
167-25-003N
PARADISE VILLAGE PKWY NOT FOR
167-25-001Z
CONSTRUCTION
167-25-001V OR
167-25-001D RECORDING
167-25-001F
LIBRARY


GROSS SITE AREA: 91.977 ACRES

RELOCATED TRANSIT NET SITE AREA: 85.268 ACRES
ELEVATED PARKING STRUCTURE
ELEVATED PARKING STRUCTURE
ELEVATED PARKING STRUCTURE
RETAIL PAD
PROPOSED HEIGHT: VARIES

ELEVATED PARKING STRUCTURE ANC01
PHASE 1 AREA TABULATIONS
D COMMERCIAL
PARKING STRUCTURE 200,000 SF
LOADING
RESTAURAUNT/RETAIL 7,882 SF
DOCKS
ANC04 (10)
ELEVATED PARKING STRUCTURE ELEVATED PARKING STRUCTURE GROCERY 45,000 SF
153,729 SF TOTAL 52,882 SF
RESIDENTIAL
5 STORIES
FUTURE PHASES MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT GROSS BUILDING AREA 361,473 SF
NET BUILDING AREA 301,861 SF
UNIT MATRIX
D STUDIO 26 UNITS
BLV 1 BEDROOM 209 UNITS
2 BEDROOM 112 UNITS
UM
62'-0"
TOTAL 347 UNITS
ANC03
TAT
4568 E CACTUS RD PHOENIX, AZ 85032
RETAIL
JCPenney 7,882 SF RETAIL PAD
130'-0"
100,000 SF 4532 SQ. FT.
PARKING TABULATIONS
GROCERY PARKING REQUIRED
LOADING/ 15' X 28' SHAFT
TRASH ABOVE
EQUIPMENT AREA AREA BELOW
ABOVE MEZZANINE
11'-0" CLEAR
Page 385
MAIN
RESIDENTIAL
METER TRASH MOVE IN
ANC02 ELEC
•• •• ROOM ROOM
O 6' X 14' SHAFT
HOLDING STAGING
ABOVE
••
B40.5 A24
•• •• STUDIO (1.25 X 26) 32.5 CARS
•• s ••
145,580 SF 1,134 SF 672 SF

GROCERY 272'-0"
1 BEDROOM (1.5 X 209) 313.5 CARS
B40.5 45,152 SF
1,134 SF MAINTENANCE
E




B40.5
2 BEDROOM (1.7 X 112) 190.4 CARS
1,134 SF


B40.5 TOTAL 536.4 CARS
6' X 14' SHAFT
PARADISE VALLEY MALL

RAMP UP ABOVE
1,134 SF


166'-0"
RESIDENTIAL
45 UNITS
35,727 NRSF
40 FOOT
RETAIL.RESTAURANT
SIGNAGE
S18 ZONE
SF BIC
s
A27
MAIN
TRASH A24 BAY A18
A21 A18 A18 BIC
A24 A24
BIC
1,131 SF 756 SF
672 SF 576 SF BST BST
SF 162.7 CARS
672 SF 672 SF
672 576 576 1,131 SF 1,131 SF A24 BAY
BIC A18
S21 S21 576 SF
588 588
1,177 SF 1,177 SF
SF SF SF 672 SF
SF SF 1,131 SF TOTAL 700 CARS
A21 S21 S21 S21
672 588 588 588
SF SF SF SF
POOL
COU TY
RTYARD
A21 S21
672 588
SF SF A24 BAY A18
PARKING PROVIDED
A21 S21 576 SF
672 588 672 SF
SF SF
BST BST


BIC A24 BAY A18
BOC S18
A18 A18
1,131 SF 504 SF RESIDENTIAL 672 SF 576 SF 1,177 SF 1,177 SF
SURFACE PARKING 389 CARS
LOBBY,LEASING
PARALLEL
1,372 SF 576 576 AMENITY LEASING
8,531 SF SPACES
s
A27x32 A18
SF SF
864 SF 576 SF
STRUCTURED
LEVEL GRADE 57 CARS
LEGEND LEVEL 2 99 CARS
Date
LEVEL 3 99 CARS
PCD AMMENDMENT DECEMBER 23, 2020
LEVEL 4 99 CARS
BOUNDARY LEVEL 5 99 CARS
ROOF 33 CARS
PHASE 1
TOTAL 478 CARS
E. CACTUS RD TOTAL 867 CARS
FUTURE PHASES
KIVA #
SDEV #
QS #
OPEN SPACE PAPP #




CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN PHASE 1
01 NORTH
SCALE: 1" = 160'-0" REF:
Drawings and written material appearing
herein constitute original and unpublished
work of the architect and may not be
duplicated, used, or disclosed without
written consent of the architect.

• •• • • • •• • • • • • •• • • • • • • • •••• • •••••••••


Project No.


A102
CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
PLANS, DESIGNS, GUIDELINES AND OTHER ELEMENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY AND SUBJECT TO FUTURE MODIFICATIONS
PROJECT INFORMATION
CURRENT ZONING: RSC
PROPOSED ZONING: PCD Ammendment,
C-2, HR, Density
Waiver & Special
Permit for Self
Storage PRELIMINARY

NOT FOR
PARCELS IN SCOPE: 167-25-003C CONSTRUCTION
167-25-003L OR
167-25-003M RECORDING

167-25-003N

GROSS SITE AREA: 77.930 ACRES
(3,394,630 SF)

NET SITE AREA: 73.495 ACRES
(3,201,442 SF)

PROPOSED HEIGHT: VARIES




4568 E CACTUS RD PHOENIX, AZ 85032


Page 386
PARADISE VALLEY MALL




Date
NOVEMBER 20, 2020



CONCEPTUAL RENDERS: GROCERY
SCALE: NTS REF:


KIVA #
SDEV #
QS #
PAPP #




Drawings and written material appearing
herein constitute original and unpublished
work of the architect and may not be
duplicated, used, or disclosed without
written consent of the architect.

© 2019 NELSEN PARTNERS, INC.


Project No.


A150
RENDERS
PLANS, DESIGNS, GUIDELINES AND OTHER ELEMENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY AND SUBJECT TO FUTURE MODIFICATIONS
352-(&7%8,/',1*+(,*+76Ǡ
Y
LIBRARY
PK
W
VI RELOCATED TRANSIT


LL
AGE
RETAIL PAD

PA ANC04 PARKING STRU ANC01
CTURE
RA D 200,000 SF
153,729 SF LOADING
D DOCKS
(10)
IS
E
N

TTA
TU
ATUM
JCPenney
100,000 SF
MB
BLV
LVD
D
RETAIL PAD
Page 387
ANC02


145,580 SF




120’ MAX BUILDING
HEIGHT

85’ MAX BUILDING
HEIGHT

30’ MAX BUILDING
HEIGHT



E. CACTUS RD
E CACTUS RD




+ PARADISE VALLEY MALL 6
RELOCATED TRANSIT STATION


E VILLAGE PKWY
PARADISE
PARADISVILLAGE PKWY


PRELIMINARY
MIXED USE NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
OR
RECORDING


ELEVATED PARKING STRUCTURE
ELEVATED PARKING STRUCTURE
ELEVATED PARKING STRUCTURE




ELEVATED PARKING STRUCTURE
PARKING STRUCTURE MIXED USE MIXED USE


ELEVATED PARKING STRUCTURE ELEVATED PARKING STRUCTURE




MIXED USE MIXED USE MIXED USE
MIXED USE LEGEND

TRANSIT STATION

MIXED USE LVD
PUBLIC LIBRARY

OPEN SPACE
62'-0"

PROPOSED OPEN SPACE RETAIL
RETAIL
7,882 SF RETAIL PAD
130'-0"
4532 SQ. FT.
MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL
D TATUM B

GROCERY
LOADING/ 15' X 28' SHAFT
TRASH ABOVE
EQUIPMENT AREA AREA BELOW
36,625 gross sq.ft GROCERY
ABOVE MEZZANINE
11'-0" CLEAR
BLV
4568 E CACTUS RD PHOENIX, AZ 85032

MAIN METER TRASH MOVE IN
ELEC
ROOM ROOM 6' X 14' SHAFT
A24 HOLDING STAGING
ABOVE

¸ 672 SF
MIXED USE
¸ s ¸ B40.5

1,134 SF
SPECIALTY GROCERY 272'-0"
B40.5 45,152 SF
INTERNAL “LOOP ROAD”
Page 388
1,134 SF MAINTENANCE
TATU
GROCER M
B40.5

1,134 SF
EXISTING PEDESTRIAN
B40.5
6' X 14' SHAFT
ABOVE
RAMP UP
1,134 SF CIRCULATION
166'-0"
MIXED USE MIXED USE ESIDENTIAL
45 UNITS 40 FOOT
5,727 NRSF SIGNAGE
S18 ZONE
SF
BIC PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN
A27
MAIN
TRASH A24 BAY A18
576 SF
PARADISE VALLEY MALL

1,131 SF 756 SF
A24 A24 672 SF BST BST
CIRCULATION
A21 A18 A18 BIC BIC
672 SF 672 SF
672 576 576 1,131 SF 1,131 SF A24 BAY
BIC A18
S21 S21
SF SF SF 588 588 672 SF 576 SF 1,177 SF 1,177 SF
SF SF 1,131 SF
A21 S21 S21 S21
672 588 588 588
SF SF SF SF
POOL
BICYCLE REPAIR STATION
COURTYARD
A21 S21
672 588
SF SF A24 BAY A18
A21 S21 576 SF
672 588 672 SF
SF SF
BST BST


BIC A24 BAY A18
BOC A18 A18 S18
672 SF 576 SF 1,177 SF 1,177 SF
1,131 SF 504 SF RESIDENTIAL
LOBBY,LEASING
PARALLEL
1,372 SF 576 576 AMENITY LEASING
8,531 SF SPACES
A27x32 A18
SF SF 576 SF
864 SF


TABULATIONS

Gross Site Area: 91.977 acres or 4,006,518 sq.ft
85,493 gross sq.ft 9,954 gross sq.ft
OPEN SPACE Date
157,588 gross sq.ft JANUARY 25, 2021
Existing Open Space: 289,660 sq. ft gross
Required Open Space: 0.05 x 4,006,518 sq ft =
E. CACTUS RD 200,326 sq.ft
E CACTUS RD.

KIVA #
SDEV #
QS #
PAPP #




Drawings and written material appearing
herein constitute original and unpublished
work of the architect and may not be
duplicated, used, or disclosed without
written consent of the architect.

© 2019 NELSEN PARTNERS, INC.


Project No.
PRELIMINARY ILLUSTRATIVE PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND OPEN SPACE PLAN 20042
SCALE: 1” = 150’
N.T.S. REF: A101.1
NORTH
PRELIMINARY ILLUSTRATIVE
PLANS, DESIGNS, GUIDELINES AND OTHER ELEMENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY AND SUBJECT TO FUTURE MODIFICATIONS PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND
OPEN SPACE
Attachment C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-49-XX-75-3

Date of VPC Meeting February 1, 2021
Request From RSC PCD (Regional Shopping Center, Planned
Community District) (91.16 acres)
Request To C-2 H-R DNS/WVR SP PCD (Intermediate
Commercial, High Rise, Density Waiver, Special
Permit, Planned Community District) for a Major
Amendment to the Paradise Valley Mall PCD (91.16
acres)
Proposed Use A mix of uses (multifamily and commercial) up to 120
feet in height and a Special Permit for self-service
storage and all underlying C-2 uses
Location Approximately 415 feet north of the northwest corner of
Scottsdale Road and Kierland Boulevard
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation.
VPC Vote 14-0 with committee members Balderrama, Gerst,
Goodhue, Hall, Maggiore, Mazza, Mortensen, Popovic,
Severs, Sparks, Stewart, Wise, Gubser and Lesher in
favor.

VPC DISCUSSION:

5 speaker cards were submitted in favor, wishing to speak
2 speaker cards were submitted in opposition, wishing to speak
Mr. David Simmons, staff, went over the request with the committee. He
covered the existing General Plan Land Use designation on the site and
surrounding area, the uses in the surrounding area, the height limitations
stipulated as well as the conceptual pedestrian circulation plan, overall site plan,
phase 1 site plan, policy plan conformity and more. He also went over stipulation
rationale with the committee.

Mr. Ed Bull, with Burch & Cracchiolo, representing the applicant, shared that the
development team appreciates staff’s recommendation for approval and accepts
staff’s stipulations. He went over the General Plan Land Use map designation for
the area, surrounding zoning, proximity to the nearest single-family residential,
the illustrative pedestrian circulation plan, and traffic circulation in the area. He
also went over heights proposed and highlighted Phase 1. He also went over the
extensive community outreach that was conducted prior to this hearing.


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 389
Mr. Robert Goodhue stated that this is a great start to the Village Core and PV
Mall revitalization efforts. He asked if the applicant is looking to reduce parking.

Mr. Bull shared that parking would not be reduced in Phase 1 and shared that
the development team does not know about future phases as of yet.

Ms. Larisa Balderrama asked why the Special Permit request for a self-storage
facility. This use doesn’t seem to fit in a mixed use environment.

Mr. Bull shared that this storage use is not your typical self-storage facility.
There is a market demand for self-storage. This will be office like in appearance
and is one of the lowest traffic generators possible.

Ms. Balderrama asked if Mr. Bull had any visualizations, he could show the
committee of the self-storage proposal.

Mr. Bull shared that the self-storage in Roosevelt Row was very similar but did
not have any graphics handy.

Mr. Paul Severs asked what the timeline is of all of the phases.

Mr. Bull shared that they have a condensed hearing schedule for this request
and should be concluding site plan review in 2021.

Chairman Robert Gubser asked if the entire mall will be demo’s at time of
Phase 1.

Mr. Bull shared that most of the mall will be closed and/or demo’s at time of
Phase 1.

Vicechair Joe Lesher asked if the JC Penny’s is being demo’ d. It is not
included in the overall site plan.

Mr. Bull shared that the JC Penny’s is in bankruptcy and can’t tell at this point
what will become of the store shell.

Vicechair Lesher asked how many acres is in Phase 1.

Mr. Bull shared that it is 13 acres.

Public Comment:

Mr. Jeff Moloznik, owner, shared that they want to retain the site as owners and
will not be selling off after constructed.

Ms. Denise Kazmierczak shared that she has concerns with density, increased
traffic, and the hour in which this meeting is being conducted. She stated that this
site needs a comprehensive master plan. She is very upset that this meeting is
happening under the cover of night at nearly midnight.



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 390
Ms. Jackie Mesa has concerns about height, too busy, too heavy. Our area is
ranch style homes. This proposal is not ranch style. The character of the area is
changing, and we can do better.

Mr. Paul Katsenes shared that he in in favor of the redevelopment plan.

Applicants Response:

Mr. Ed Bull shared that a pedestrian circulation plan is stipulated as well as a
circulation plan, shade requirements and much more. This proposal will bring eh
Paradise Valley Village Core back to life.

Mr. Ben Stewart shared that he is very excited about this project. He stated that
this is one of the most important projects the Village will be voting on.

Mr. Bull stated that the development team is hitting on all of the pistons for the
Village Core. The parking garage is going to stay, JC Penny’s is not going to stay
at this location.

Ms. Hall shared that she lives in the area, loves the location, went to PV Mall
when it was vibrant and has watched it deteriorate over the years. Red
Development is local, and they care about the community. She is in support.

Chairman Gubser shared that the spent so much time at that mall growing up.
Red Development does a great job and he is looking forward to what is to come.

Mr. Robert Goodhue shared that JC Penny’s is a separate piece of property.
We do not want to see this project go the way of City North.
MOTION:
Ms. Jennifer Hall made a motion to recommend approval of Rezoning Case No.
Z-49-XX-75-3, per staff’s recommendation.
Mr. Daniel Mazza seconded the motion.
VOTE:
14-0 with committee members Balderrama, Gerst, Goodhue, Hall, Maggiore,
Mazza, Mortensen, Popovic, Severs, Sparks, Stewart, Wise, Gubser and Lesher
in favor.

Staff Comments:

None




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 391
Attachment D


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
February 4, 2021

ITEM NO: 7
DISTRICT NO.: 3
SUBJECT:

Application #: Z-49-XX-75-3
Location: Northwest corner of Tatum Boulevard and Cactus Road
From: RSC PCD
To: C-2 H-R DNS/WVR SP PCD
Acreage: 91.16
Proposal: Major Amendment to the Paradise Valley PCD to allow a mix of uses
(multifamily and commercial) up to 120 feet in height and a Special
Permit for self-service storage and all underlying C-2 uses.
Applicant: Ed Bull, Burch & Cracchiolo P.A.
Owner: Paradise Valley Mall SPE, LLC, et al
Representative: Ed Bull, Burch & Cracchiolo P.A.

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Paradise Valley 2/1/2021 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 14-0.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Paradise Valley Village Planning
Committee recommendation, with an additional stipulation.

Motion Discussion: N/A.

Motion details: Commissioner Howard made a MOTION to approve Z-49-XX-75-3, per the
Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee recommendation, with an additional stipulation as
read into the record.

Maker: Howard
Second: Mangum
Vote: 8-0
Absent: Johnson
Opposition Present: Yes

Findings:

1. The proposed development will revitalize a prominent site within a village core.

2. The proposed zoning will allow for additional housing units to be built which will
help alleviate the housing shortage in Phoenix and advance the goals of the
Housing Phoenix Plan.




Page 392
3. The proposed developments scale and intensity is appropriate given the
location within the Paradise Valley Village Core, at the intersection of major
arterials and at a location served by existing transit.

Stipulations:

1. Building heights shall be limited to a maximum of 120 feet, 85 feet, and 30 feet,
as depicted on the Project Building Heights exhibit, date stamped January 5,
2021.

2. Buildings shall have a cohesive design theme throughout the development and
all buildings visible from public streets and private accessways and driveways
shall contain a minimum of three architectural embellishments and detailing
such as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, variation in window size
and location, and/or overhang canopies, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

3. The following frontage types shall be provided for all dwelling units oriented to
the Paradise Valley Mall Loop Road (“loop road”), as approved by the Planning
and Development Department:

a. Individual pedestrian entrance oriented to the loop road and
connected to the public sidewalk by a direct pedestrian pathway.

b. Include a porch or patio, described as follows:

(1) Porches shall have a minimum dimension of six feet in
depth by a width of no less than 50 percent of the total
unit; be oriented to the outer loop road; have a unit
entrance; and have a direct pedestrian connection to the
public/private sidewalk.

(2) Patios shall have a minimum dimension of six feet in depth
by a minimum width of 9 feet, and a minimum size of 54
square feet; be enclosed on each side by a low wall or
fence not to exceed 36 inches in height; be oriented to the
loop road; have a unit entrance; and have a direct
pedestrian connection to the public/private sidewalk.

4. Pedestrian circulation shall generally conform to the Conceptual Illustrative
Open Space and Pedestrian Circulation exhibit, date stamped January 13,
2021. Alternative pedestrian pathways may be approved so long as pedestrian
connectivity is provided for the following:

 Relocated transit center

 Library

 Existing and future open space areas




Page 393
 Public streets

Plans shall show future shading generally contained to pedestrian pathways,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

5. A Master Pedestrian Circulation/Open Space Plan shall be completed prior to
preliminary site plan approval. This master plan shall be updated for each
phase of development, as each new phase is in the city’s development review
process. The Master Pedestrian Circulation/Open Space Plan shall generally
be consistent with the Conceptual Illustrative Open Space and Pedestrian
Circulation exhibit, date stamped January 13, 2021, or future alternative plans,
and include the following features:

 Pedestrian circulation, including at least one primary pedestrian
route for north-south circulation and one for east-west circulation.

 Pavement widths and details

 Shade treatment and calculation

 Locations of detached sidewalks

 Locations of attached sidewalks

 Vehicular roadways

 Open space areas

 Bicycle amenities

6. Open space areas shall conform to Section 1310 of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance. The open space areas shall provide at a minimum decorative
paving, landscaping, shade elements, trash receptacles, art or artistic
elements or seating areas and shall be located at the following locations:

 Northwest corner of Tatum Boulevard and Cactus Road

 South of the southwest corner of Tatum Boulevard and Larkspur
Drive

 Northeast corner of Paradise Village Parkway and Cactus Road

7. Bicycle infrastructure shall be provided, as described below and as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Two bicycle repair stations (fix-it stations) shall be provided in areas
of high visibility, convenient pedestrian access, and available from
the public and/or provide sidewalks. The stations shall include
standard repair tools affixed to the station, a tire gauge and pump,




Page 394
and a bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin
freely while making adjustments to the bike.

One station shall be provided with the first phase of development
and the second station shall be provided with a future phase of
development along the north portion of the loop road, as depicted on
the Conceptual Illustrative Open Space and Pedestrian Circulation
exhibit, date stamped January 13, 2021.

b. Bicycle parking shall be required per Section 1307.H of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance.

c. All required bicycle parking for multifamily use, per Section
1307.H.6.d. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, shall be secured
parking.

d. Guest bicycle parking for multifamily residential use shall be
provided at a minimum of 0.5 spaces per unit with a maximum of 50
spaces near entrances of buildings and installed per the
requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.

e. A minimum of 10 percent of the required bicycle parking for
nonresidential uses shall be secured per the requirements of
Section 1307.H. of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.

8. All public sidewalks shall be detached with a minimum 5-foot-wide landscape
area located between the sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the
following standards, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the
Planning and Development Department on alternative design solutions with a
pedestrian environment.

Detached sidewalk shall be provided proportionally as redevelopment occurs
adjacent to or within 100 feet of the public right-of-way.

a. Minimum 3-inch caliper large canopy, single-trunk, shade trees
placed a minimum of 25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings to
provide a minimum of 50 percent shade at maturity on all adjacent
sidewalks.

b. Drought tolerant shrubs and vegetative groundcovers with a
maximum mature height of 24 inches to provide a minimum of 50
percent live coverage at maturity.

9. Seasonal shade, sun and temperature regulation through vegetative or
structural shade elements shall be provided for Phase 1 of the development at
the northwest corner of Tatum Boulevard and Cactus Road to allow
pedestrians to enter the site comfortably, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 395
10. There shall be a minimum of 25 percent structural or vegetative shade at
maturity in the surface parking lots, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

11. The developer shall wrap all newly constructed parking structures visible from
the loop road or any primary pedestrian route (to be identified on the Master
Pedestrian Circulation/Open Space Plan) with other uses such as, street level
retail, office space, or residential dwelling units; or with decorative screening
such as, perforated screening, illuminated art, living greenery, decorative metal
panels or other design features, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

12. Newly constructed walls visible from public streets of the loop road shall
incorporate stone veneer, stonework, integral color CMU block, decorative
block, split face or faux stone, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

13. The self-service storage warehouse use, covered under the Special Permit,
shall comply with the following:

a. Storage buildings shall not exceed three stories or 30 feet in height.

b. Storage buildings shall be limited to an 80,000-square foot footprint,
and not to exceed a 200,000-square foot floor area.

c. Any outdoor storage areas must be screened with a decorative solid
wall.

14. Relocation and/or reconstruction of the Paradise Valley Transit Center is
subject to Planning and Development Department and Public Transit
Department Approval. A minimum of three transit vehicle servicing points shall
be constructed at any relocated or reconstructed site. All plans and designs for
relocated and/or reconstructed transit facilities shall require approval from the
Public Transit Department and the Planning and Development Department.
The Public Transit Department shall retain removable assets located at the
Paradise Valley Transit Center should relocation and/or reconstruction be
approved.

15. Trees or shade structures shall be placed to provide a minimum of 50 percent
shade coverage in pedestrian areas at the transit center.

16. Vehicle access to all public transit facilities shall be ensured by dedication of
transit easements or other legal agreements, as approved by the Public Transit
Department and the Planning and Development Department.

17. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and construct two bus stop pads at
locations approved or modified by the Public Transit Department. Bus stop
pads shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1260
with a minimum depth of 10 feet. Bus stop pads shall be spaced from
intersections according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258. Trees shall
be placed to provide 50 percent shade at bus stop pads, as approved by the




Page 396
Planning and Development Department.

18. Clearly defined, accessible pedestrian pathways shall be provided to connect
building entrances, bus stop pads, transit center, site amenities, and public
sidewalks, using the most direct route for pedestrians, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

19. Where pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles, they shall be constructed of
decorative pavers, stamped, or colored concrete, or other pavement
treatments that visually contrast with the adjacent parking and drive aisle
surfaces, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

20. All cross-access agreements shall include a pedestrian pathway, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

21. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of site plans shall be granted until the
study is reviewed and approved by the City. Contact Mr. Christopher
Kowalsky, Special Projects Administrator, at (602) 534-7105, to set up a
meeting to discuss the requirements of the study. Upon completion of the TIS
the developer shall submit the completed TIS to the Planning and
Development Department counter with instruction to forward the study to the
Street Transportation Department, City Engineers Office. Additional
dedications and/or improvements may be required as per the approved Traffic
Impact Study.

22. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
landscape median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department. All improvements
shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

23. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

24. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER
SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE
WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDER'S OFFICE AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED
IN THE REZONING APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact Tamra
Ingersoll at (602) 534-6648, TTY use 7-1-1.




Page 397



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing - Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Responsible Adult Use
of Marijuana - Z-TA-8-20 (Ordinance G-6810)

Request to hold a public hearing on a proposed text amendment Z-TA-8-20 and to
request City Council approve Z-TA-8-20 as proposed which amends Chapter 6,
Section 623.D.124 (Commercial C-2 District-Intermediate Commercial) and 627.D.92
(A-1 Light Industrial District) of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to address changes to
the Arizona Revised Statutes regarding responsible adult use of marijuana (Smart and
Safe Arizona Act).

Summary
Application: Z-TA-8-20
Proposal: Request to amend Chapter 6, Section 623.D.124 (Commercial C-2 District-
Intermediate Commercial) and 627.D.92 (A-1 Light Industrial District) of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance to address changes to the Arizona Revised Statutes regarding
responsible adult use of marijuana (Smart and Safe Arizona Act).

Applicant: City of Phoenix, Planning Commission
Representative: City of Phoenix, Planning and Development Department

The voters of the State of Arizona approved Proposition 207, known as the "Smart and
Safe Arizona Act" on Nov. 3, 2020. The Smart and Safe Arizona Act amended Title 36,
of the Arizona State Statutes by adding Chapter 28.2, and added regulations related to
the retail sale of marijuana at licensed establishments (marijuana establishments).
This text amendment proposes changes to the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to be
consistent with the new provisions of Title 36 of the Arizona Revised Statutes.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Z-TA-8-20, per the Attachment
B - Staff Report Exhibit A language.
VPC Action: The request was heard by all fifteen Village Planning Committees (VPCs).
Thirteen VPCs recommended approval and two VPCs recommended approval with a
modification, as reflected in Attachment C - VPC Results.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Feb. 4, 2021 and
recommended approval, per the language in Exhibit A of the Staff Report by a 7-0


Page 398

vote, as reflected in Attachment D - PC Summary.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 399
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE


ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE CODE OF THE
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA, PART II, CHAPTER 41, THE
ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX BY AMENDING
CHAPTER 6, SECTION 623.D.124.D (COMMERCIAL C-2 DISTRICT
– INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL) AND CHAPTER 6, SECTION
627.D.92.C (INDUSTRIAL A-1 DISTRICT – LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
DISTRICT) OF THE PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE TO
CHANGES TO THE ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES REGARDING
RESPONSIBLE ADULT USE OF MARIJUANA (SMART AND SAFE
ARIZONA ACT).

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1: That Chapter 2, Section 202 (Definitions), is amended to read:

Amend Section 202 (Definitions) by adding the following new definitions in
correct alphabetical order:
***
CANNABIS: MEANS THE FOLLOWING SUBSTANCES UNDER WHATEVER NAMES
THEY MAY BE DESIGNATED:

1. THE RESIN EXTRACTED FROM ANY PART OF A PLANT OF THE GENUS
CANNABIS, AND EVERY COMPOUND, MANUFACTURE, SALT, DERIVATIVE,
MIXTURE OR PREPARATION OF SUCH PLANT, ITS SEEDS OR ITS RESIN.
CANNABIS DOES NOT INCLUDE OIL OR CAKE MADE FROM THE SEEDS OF
SUCH PLANT, ANY FIBER, COMPOUND, MANUFACTURE, SALT,
DERIVATIVE, MIXTURE OR PREPARATION OF THE MATURE STALKS OF
SUCH PLANT EXCEPT THE RESIN EXTRACTED FROM THE STALKS OR ANY
FIBER, OIL OR CAKE OR THE STERILIZED SEED OF SUCH PLANT WHICH IS
INCAPABLE OF GERMINATION.

2. EVERY COMPOUND, MANUFACTURE, SALT, DERIVATIVE, MIXTURE OR
PREPARATION OF SUCH RESIN OR TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL.
***




-1- Ordinance ________
Page 400
INDUSTRIAL HEMP: MEANS THE PLANT CANNABIS SATIVA L. AND ANY PART OF
SUCH A PLANT, WHETHER GROWING OR NOT, WITH A DELTA-9
TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL CONCENTRATION OF NOT MORE THAN THREE-
TENTHS PERCENT ON A DRY-WEIGHT BASIS.
***
MARIJUANA:

1. MEANS ALL PARTS OF THE PLANT OF THE GENUS CANNABIS, WHETHER
GROWING OR NOT, AS WELL AS THE SEEDS FROM THE PLANT, THE
RESIN EXTRACTED FROM ANY PART OF THE PLANT, AND EVERY
COMPOUND, MANUFACTURE, SALT, DERIVATIVE, MIXTURE OR
PREPARATION OF THE PLANT OR ITS SEEDS OR RESIN.

2. DOES NOT INCLUDE INDUSTRIAL HEMP, THE FIBER PRODUCED FROM
THE STALKS OF THE PLANT OF THE GENUS CANNABIS, OIL OR CAKE
MADE FROM THE SEEDS OF THE PLANT, STERILIZED SEEDS OF THE
PLANT THAT ARE INCAPABLE OF GERMINATION, OR THE WEIGHT OF ANY
OTHER INGREDIENT COMBINED WITH MARIJUANA TO PREPARE TOPICAL
OR ORAL ADMINISTRATIONS, FOOD, DRINK OR OTHER PRODUCTS.
***
MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT: MEANS AN ENTITY LICENSED BY THE ARIZONA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES TO OPERATE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING:

1. A SINGLE RETAIL LOCATION AT WHICH THE LICENSEE MAY SELL
MARIJUANA AND MARIJUANA PRODUCTS TO CONSUMERS, CULTIVATE
MARIJUANA AND MANUFACTURE MARIJUANA PRODUCTS.

2. A SINGLE OFF-SITE CULTIVATION LOCATION AT WHICH THE LICENSEE MAY
CULTIVATE MARIJUANA, PROCESS MARIJUANA AND MANUFACTURE
MARIJUANA PRODUCTS, BUT FROM WHICH MARIJUANA AND MARIJUANA
PRODUCTS MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED OR SOLD TO CONSUMERS.

3. A SINGLE OFF-SITE LOCATION AT WHICH THE LICENSEE MAY
MANUFACTURE MARIJUANA PRODUCTS AND PACKAGE AND STORE
MARIJUANA AND MARIJUANA PRODUCTS, BUT FROM WHICH MARIJUANA
AND MARIJUANA PRODUCTS MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED OR SOLD TO
CONSUMERS.
***
MARIJUANA PRODUCTS: MEANS MARIJUANA CONCENTRATE AND PRODUCTS
THAT ARE COMPOSED OF MARIJUANA AND OTHER INGREDIENTS AND THAT
ARE INTENDED FOR USE OR CONSUMPTION, INCLUDING EDIBLE PRODUCTS,
OINTMENTS AND TINCTURES.
***




-2- Ordinance ________
Page 401
SECTION 2: That Chapter 6, Section 623.D.124 (Commercial C-2 District –

Intermediate Commercial), is amended to read:

Amend Section 623.D.124 (Commercial C-2 District—Intermediate Commercial) to
read as follows:
***
D. Permitted Uses.
***
124. Nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary facility, subject to the following
conditions and limitations; failure to comply with the below regulations and
requirements is subject to revocation per Section 307.

a. A use permit shall be obtained in accordance with standards and
procedures of Section 307 and the following:

(1) Shall be reviewed every 365 calendar days.

(2) Provide name(s) and location(s) of the off-site cultivation
location.

(3) Include a copy of the operating procedures adopted in
compliance with Section 36-2804(B)(1)(c), Arizona Revised
Statutes.

(4) A survey sealed by a registrant of the State of Arizona shall be
submitted to show compliance with the distance requirements
listed below.

b. Cultivation of medical marijuana is prohibited.

c. Shall be located in a closed building and may not be located in a
trailer, cargo container, motor vehicle or similar structure or motorized
or non-motorized vehicle.

d. Shall not exceed 5,000 square feet of COMBINED net floor area
dedicated exclusively to the nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary
AND MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT; this shall include all storage
areas, retail space and offices for the nonprofit medical marijuana
dispensary AND MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT.




-3- Ordinance ________
Page 402
e. Shall not be located within 5,280 feet of the same type of use or a
medical marijuana cultivation or infusion facility. This distance shall be
measured from the exterior wall of the building or portion thereof in
which the business is conducted or proposed to be conducted to the
nearest exterior wall or portion thereof of another medical marijuana
dispensary, cultivation, or infusion facility.

f. Shall not be located within 500 feet of the following residentially zoned
districts: S-1, S-2, RE-43, RE-35, R1-18, R1-14, R1-10, R1-8, R1-6,
R-2, R-3, R3-A, R-4, R-4A, R-5, and PAD-1 through PAD-15. This
distance shall be measured from the exterior walls of the building or
portion thereof in which the dispensary business is conducted or
proposed to be conducted to the zoning boundary line of the
residentially zoned district.

g. Shall not be located within 1,320 feet of a preschool, kindergarten,
elementary, secondary or high school, public park, public community
center, dependent care facility, homeless shelter, or youth community
center. This distance shall be measured from the exterior walls of the
building or portion thereof in which the dispensary business is
conducted or proposed to be conducted to the property line of the
protected use.

h. Shall not be located within 1,320 feet of a place of worship. This
distance shall be measured from the exterior walls of the building or
portion thereof in which the dispensary business is conducted or
proposed to be conducted to the property line of the place of worship.

i. Shall have operating hours not earlier than 8:00 a.m. and not later
than 10:00 p.m.

j. Drive-through services are prohibited.

k. There shall be no emission of dust, fumes, vapors or odors into the
environment from the premises.

L. THE RETAIL SALE OF MARIJUANA AND MARIJUANA PRODUCTS
TO CONSUMERS IN A MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT SHALL BE
PERMITTED AS ACCESSORY USE ONLY.
***

SECTION 3: That Chapter 6, Section 627.D.92 (Industrial A-1 District – Light

Industrial District), is amended to read:




-4- Ordinance ________
Page 403
Amend Section 627.D.92 (A-1 Light Industrial District) to read as follows:
***
D. Permitted Uses.
***
92. Medical marijuana dispensary facility, subject to the following conditions and
limitations; failure to comply with the below regulations and requirements is
subject to revocation per Section 307:

a. A use permit shall be obtained in accordance with standards and
procedures of Section 307 of the Zoning Ordinance and the following:

(1) Shall be reviewed every 365 calendar days.

(2) Provide name(s) and location(s) of the off-site cultivation
location.

(3) Include a copy of the operating procedures adopted in
compliance with Section 36-2804(B)(1)(c), Arizona Revised
Statutes.

(4) A survey sealed by a registrant of the State of Arizona shall be
submitted to show compliance with the distance requirements
listed below.

b. Shall be located in a closed building and may not be located in a
trailer, cargo container, motor vehicle or similar structure or motorized
or non-motorized vehicle.

c. Shall not exceed 5,000 square feet of COMBINED net floor area
DEDICATED EXCLUSIVELY TO THE NONPROFIT MEDICAL
MARIJUANA DISPENSARY AND MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT;
this shall include all storage areas, retail space and offices FOR THE
NONPROFIT MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY AND
MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT.

d. Shall not be located within 5,280 feet of the same type of use or a
medical marijuana cultivation or infusion facility. This distance shall be
measured from the exterior wall of the building or portion thereof in
which the business is conducted or proposed to be conducted to the
nearest exterior wall or portion thereof of another medical marijuana
dispensary, cultivation, or infusion facility.




-5- Ordinance ________
Page 404
e. Shall not be located within 500 feet of the following residentially zoned
districts: S-1, S-2, RE-43, RE-35, RE-24, R1-18, R1-14, R1-10, R1-8,
R1-6, R-2, R-3, R-3A, R-4, R-4A, R-5, and PAD-1 through PAD-15.
This distance shall be measured from the exterior walls of the building
or portion thereof in which the dispensary business is conducted or
proposed to be conducted to the zoning boundary line of the
residentially zoned district.

f. Shall not be located within 1,320 feet of a preschool, kindergarten,
elementary, secondary or high school, public park, public community
center, dependent care facility, homeless shelter, or youth community
center. This distance shall be measured from the exterior walls of the
building or portion thereof in which the dispensary business is
conducted or proposed to be conducted to the property line of the
protected use.

g. Shall not be located within 1,320 feet of a place of worship. This
distance shall be measured from the exterior walls of the building or
portion thereof in which the dispensary business is conducted or
proposed to be conducted to the property line of the place of worship.

h. Shall have operating hours not earlier than 8:00 a.m. and not later
than 10:00 p.m.

i. Drive-through services are prohibited.

j. There shall be no emission of dust, fumes, vapors or odors into the
environment from the premises.

K. THE RETAIL SALE OF MARIJUANA AND MARIJUANA PRODUCTS
TO CONSUMERS IN A MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT SHALL BE
PERMITTED AS ACCESSORY USE ONLY.
***

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 17th day of February, 2021



________________________________
MAYOR




-6- Ordinance ________
Page 405
ATTEST:


____________________________City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:

____________________________City Attorney


REVIEWED BY:

____________________________City Manager




-7- Ordinance ________
Page 406
Attachment B




Staff Report
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment
Z-TA-8-20
(Responsible Adult Use of Marijuana)
January 4, 2021

Application No. Z-TA-8-20: Amend Chapter 2, Section 202 (Definitions) and Chapter
6, Sections 623.D.124 (Commercial C-2 District—Intermediate Commercial) and
627.D.92 (A-1 Light Industrial District) of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to address
changes to the Arizona Revised Statutes regarding responsible adult use of marijuana
(Smart and Safe Arizona Act).

Staff recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Z-TA-8-20 as shown in
Exhibit A.

Purpose
The voters of the State of Arizona approved Proposition 207, also known as the “Smart
and Safe Arizona Act" on November 3, 2020. The Smart and Safe Arizona Act amended
Title 36, of the Arizona Revised Statutes by adding Chapter 28.2, and added regulations
related to the retail sale of marijuana at licensed establishments (marijuana
establishments). This text amendment proposes changes to the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance to be consistent with the new provisions of Title 36 of the Arizona Revised
Statutes.

Background
Chapter 28.2 of Title 36 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S) also contains
provisions on how a locality (city) may regulate marijuana establishments. Should a city
propose to permit and regulate marijuana establishments, the A.R.S provisions do not
allow the city to enact more restrictive regulations or rules than those that apply to
nonprofit medical marijuana dispensaries. Furthermore, the A.R.S prohibits cities from
restricting or interfering with the ability of an entity to operate a nonprofit medical
marijuana dispensary and a marijuana establishment at a shared location.

The number of marijuana establishment licenses are capped at one marijuana
establishment license for every 10 pharmacies that have obtained a pharmacy permit
and operate in this state. Beginning January 19, 2021 through March 9, 2021, the
Arizona Department of Health Services is required to accept early applications for
marijuana establishments from both:

1. Currently registered nonprofit medical marijuana dispensaries.

2. Applicants seeking to operate a marijuana establishment in a county with fewer than
two nonprofit medical marijuana dispensaries.

Page 407
Z-TA-8-20
February 4, 2021 Planning Commission

The proposed language adds definitions for “cannabis”, “industrial hemp”, “marijuana”,
“marijuana establishment”, and “marijuana products” that mirrors the language in the
A.R.S. The language also proposes to permit marijuana establishments as an
accessory use to a non-profit medical marijuana dispensary. This approach is
consistent with the provisions outlined in the A.R.S.

Non-profit medical marijuana dispensaries are permitted in the C-2, C-3, A-1 and A-2
zoning districts subject to several conditions and require a use permit. One of the
conditions is that the dispensaries are limited to a maximum of 5,000 square feet of net
floor area. This 5,000 square foot floor area limitation will apply to the combination of
the areas for the non-profit medical marijuana dispensary and the marijuana
establishment. Existing non-profit medical marijuana dispensaries that would like to add
a marijuana establishment as an accessory use may be required to modify their existing
use permit to address square footage limitations or any other use permit conditions that
would preclude the addition of the accessory use.

Conclusion
The proposed text amendment creates a regulatory framework for marijuana
establishments by making them an accessory use to a non-profit medical marijuana
dispensary. A comprehensive assessment of marijuana regulations will be reviewed in
the future, but the purpose of this text amendment is to update the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance to comply with the new A.R.S provisions prior to marijuana establishment
licenses becoming effective.

Staff recommends approval of Z-TA-8-20 as proposed in Exhibit A.

Writer
T. Gomes
1/4/21

Exhibit
A. Proposed Language




Page 408
Exhibit A
Z-TA-8-20
February 4, 2021 Planning Commission

Text Amendment Z-TA-8-20: Responsible Adult Use of Marijuana

Proposed Language:

Amend Section 202 (Definitions) by adding the following new definitions in
correct alphabetical order:
***
CANNABIS: MEANS THE FOLLOWING SUBSTANCES UNDER WHATEVER NAMES
THEY MAY BE DESIGNATED:

1. THE RESIN EXTRACTED FROM ANY PART OF A PLANT OF THE GENUS
CANNABIS, AND EVERY COMPOUND, MANUFACTURE, SALT, DERIVATIVE,
MIXTURE OR PREPARATION OF SUCH PLANT, ITS SEEDS OR ITS RESIN.
CANNABIS DOES NOT INCLUDE OIL OR CAKE MADE FROM THE SEEDS OF
SUCH PLANT, ANY FIBER, COMPOUND, MANUFACTURE, SALT,
DERIVATIVE, MIXTURE OR PREPARATION OF THE MATURE STALKS OF
SUCH PLANT EXCEPT THE RESIN EXTRAC TED FROM THE STALKS OR ANY
FIBER, OIL OR CAKE OR THE STERILIZED SEED OF SUCH PLANT WHICH IS
INCAPABLE OF GERMINATION.

2. EVERY COMPOUND, MANUFACTURE, SALT, DERIVATIVE, MIXTURE OR
PREPARATION OF SUCH RESIN OR TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL.
***
INDUSTRIAL HEMP: MEANS THE PLANT CANNABIS SATIVA L. AND ANY PART OF
SUCH A PLANT, WHETHER GROWING OR NOT, WITH A DELTA-9
TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL CONCENTRATION OF NOT MORE THAN THREE-
TENTHS PERCENT ON A DRY-WEIGHT BASIS.
***
MARIJUANA:

1. MEANS ALL PARTS OF THE PLANT OF THE GENUS CANNABIS, WHETHER
GROWING OR NOT, AS WELL AS THE SEEDS FROM THE PLANT, THE
RESIN EXTRACTED FROM ANY PART OF THE PLANT, AND EVERY
COMPOUND, MANUFACTURE, SALT, DERIVATIVE, MIXTURE OR
PREPARATION OF THE PLANT OR ITS SEEDS OR RESIN.

2. DOES NOT INCLUDE INDUSTRIAL HEMP, THE FIBER PRODUCED FROM
THE STALKS OF THE PLANT OF THE GENUS CANNABIS, OIL OR CAKE
MADE FROM THE SEEDS OF THE PLANT, STERILIZED SEEDS OF THE
PLANT THAT ARE INCAPABLE OF GERMINATION, OR THE WEIGHT OF ANY
OTHER INGREDIENT COMBINED WITH MARIJUANA TO PREPARE TOPICAL
OR ORAL ADMINISTRATIONS, FOOD, DRINK OR OTHER PRODUCTS.
***
MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT: MEANS AN ENTITY LICENSED BY THE ARIZONA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES TO OPERATE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING:




Page 409
Z-TA-8-20
February 4, 2021 Planning Commission

1. A SINGLE RETAIL LOCATION AT WHICH THE LICENSEE MAY SELL
MARIJUANA AND MARIJUANA PRODUCTS TO CONSUMERS, CULTIVATE
MARIJUANA AND MANUFACTURE MARIJUANA PRODUCTS.

2. A SINGLE OFF-SITE CULTIVATION LOCATION AT WHICH THE LICENSEE MAY
CULTIVATE MARIJUANA, PROCESS MARIJUANA AND MANUFACTURE
MARIJUANA PRODUCTS, BUT FROM WHICH MARIJUANA AND MARIJUANA
PRODUCTS MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED OR SOLD TO CONSUMERS.

3. A SINGLE OFF-SITE LOCATION AT WHICH THE LICENSEE MAY
MANUFACTURE MARIJUANA PRODUCTS AND PACKAGE AND STORE
MARIJUANA AND MARIJUANA PRODUCTS, BUT FROM WHICH MARIJUANA
AND MARIJUANA PRODUCTS MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED OR SOLD T O
CONSUMERS.
***
MARIJUANA PRODUCTS: MEANS MARIJUANA CONCENTRATE AND PRODUCTS
THAT ARE COMPOSED OF MARIJUANA AND OTHER INGREDIENTS AND THAT
ARE INTENDED FOR USE OR CONSUMPTION, INCLUDING EDIBLE PRODUCTS,
OINTMENTS AND TINCTURES.
***

Amend Section 623.D.124 (Commercial C-2 District—Intermediate Commercial) to
read as follows:
***
D. Permitted Uses.
***
124. Nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary facility, subject to the following
conditions and limitations; failure to comply with the below regulations and
requirements is subject to revocation per Section 307.

a. A use permit shall be obtained in accordance with standards and
procedures of Section 307 and the following:

(1) Shall be reviewed every 365 calendar days.

(2) Provide name(s) and location(s) of the off-site cultivation
location.

(3) Include a copy of the operating procedures adopted in
compliance with Section 36-2804(B)(1)(c), Arizona Revised
Statutes.

(4) A survey sealed by a registrant of the State of Arizona shall be
submitted to show compliance with the distance requirements
listed below.

b. Cultivation of medical marijuana is prohibited.


Page 410
Z-TA-8-20
February 4, 2021 Planning Commission

c. Shall be located in a closed building and may not be located in a
trailer, cargo container, motor vehicle or similar structure or motorized
or non-motorized vehicle.

d. Shall not exceed 5,000 square feet of COMBINED net floor area
dedicated exclusively to the nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary
AND MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT; this shall include all storage
areas, retail space and offices for the nonprofit medical marijuana
dispensary AND MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT.

e. Shall not be located within 5,280 feet of the same type of use or a
medical marijuana cultivation or infusion facility. This distance shall be
measured from the exterior wall of the building or portion thereof in
which the business is conducted or proposed to be conducted to the
nearest exterior wall or portion thereof of another medical marijuana
dispensary, cultivation, or infusion facility.

f. Shall not be located within 500 feet of the following residentially zoned
districts: S-1, S-2, RE-43, RE-35, R1-18, R1-14, R1-10, R1-8, R1-6,
R-2, R-3, R3-A, R-4, R-4A, R-5, and PAD-1 through PAD-15. This
distance shall be measured from the exterior walls of the building or
portion thereof in which the dispensary business is conducted or
proposed to be conducted to the zoning boundary line of the
residentially zoned district.

g. Shall not be located within 1,320 feet of a preschool, kindergarten,
elementary, secondary or high school, public park, public community
center, dependent care facility, homeless shelter, or youth community
center. This distance shall be measured from the exterior walls of the
building or portion thereof in which the dispensary business is
conducted or proposed to be conducted to the property line of the
protected use.

h. Shall not be located within 1,320 feet of a place of worship. This
distance shall be measured from the exterior walls of the building or
portion thereof in which the dispensary business is conducted or
proposed to be conducted to the property line of the place of worship.

i. Shall have operating hours not earlier than 8:00 a.m. and not later
than 10:00 p.m.

j. Drive-through services are prohibited.

k. There shall be no emission of dust, fumes, vapors or odors into the
environment from the premises.




Page 411
Z-TA-8-20
February 4, 2021 Planning Commission

L. THE RETAIL SALE OF MARIJUANA AND MARIJUANA PRODUCTS
TO CONSUMERS IN A MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT SHALL BE
PERMITTED AS ACCESSORY USE ONLY.
***

Amend Section 627.D.92 (A-1 Light Industrial District) to read as follows:
***
D. Permitted Uses.
***
92. Medical marijuana dispensary facility, subjec t to the following conditions and
limitations; failure to comply with the below regulations and requirements is
subject to revocation per Section 307:

a. A use permit shall be obtained in accordance with standards and
procedures of Section 307 of the Zoning Ordinance and the following:

(1) Shall be reviewed every 365 calendar days.

(2) Provide name(s) and location(s) of the off-site cultivation
location.

(3) Include a copy of the operating procedures adopted in
compliance with Section 36-2804(B)(1)(c), Arizona Revised
Statutes.

(4) A survey sealed by a registrant of the State of Arizona shall be
submitted to show compliance with the distance requirements
listed below.

b. Shall be located in a closed building and may not be located in a
trailer, cargo container, motor vehicle or similar structure or motorized
or non-motorized vehicle.

c. Shall not exceed 5,000 square feet of COMBINED net floor area
DEDICATED EXCLUSIVELY TO THE NONPROFIT MEDICAL
MARIJUANA DISPENSARY AND MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT;
this shall include all storage areas, retail space and offices FOR THE
NONPROFIT MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY AND
MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT.

d. Shall not be located within 5,280 feet of the same type of use or a
medical marijuana cultivation or infusion facility. This distance sha ll be
measured from the exterior wall of the building or portion thereof in
which the business is conducted or prop osed to be conducted to the
nearest exterior wall or portion thereof of another medical marijuana
dispensary, cultivation, or infusion facility.



Page 412
Z-TA-8-20
February 4, 2021 Planning Commission

e. Shall not be located within 500 feet of the following residentially zoned
districts: S-1, S-2, RE-43, RE-35, RE-24, R1-18, R1-14, R1-10, R1-8,
R1-6, R-2, R-3, R-3A, R-4, R-4A, R-5, and PAD-1 through PAD-15.
This distance shall be measured from the exte rior walls of the building
or portion thereof in which the dispensary business is conducted or
proposed to be conducted to the zoning boundary line of the
residentially zoned district.

f. Shall not be located within 1,320 feet of a preschool, kindergarten,
elementary, secondary or high school, public park, public community
center, dependent care facility, homeless shelter, or youth community
center. This distance shall be measured from the exterior walls of the
building or portion thereof in which the dispensary business is
conducted or proposed to be conducted to the property line of the
protected use.

g. Shall not be located within 1,320 feet of a place of worship. This
distance shall be measured from the exterior walls of the building or
portion thereof in which the dispensary business is conducted or
proposed to be conducted to the property line of the place of worship.

h. Shall have operating hours not earlier than 8:00 a.m. and not later
than 10:00 p.m.

i. Drive-through services are prohibited.

j. There shall be no emission of dust, fumes, vapors or odors into the
environment from the premises.

K. THE RETAIL SALE OF MARIJUANA AND MARIJUANA PRODUCTS
TO CONSUMERS IN A MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT SHALL BE
PERMITTED AS ACCESSORY USE ONLY.
***




Page 413
ATTACHMENT C
TA-8-20: Responsible Adult Use of Marijuana -
Village Planning Committee Summary Results

Village Date Recommendations Vote
Central City 1/11/21 Approved 15-0
Laveen 1/11/21 Approved 8-0-1
Rio Vista 1/12/21 Approved 4-0
South Mountain 1/12/21 Approved with a modification to allow 10-0
marijuana establishments as a primary use
Maryvale 1/13/21 Approved 9-1
Deer Valley 1/14/21 Approved 13-0
North Gateway 1/14/21 Approved 6-0
Estrella 1/19/21 Approved 6-0
North Mountain 1/20/21 Approved 13-1-1
Ahwatukee Foothills 1/25/21 Approved 10-0-1
Alhambra 1/26/21 Approved 16-1
Encanto 2/1/21 Approved with a modification to require a 12-1
use permit for marijuana establishments
Paradise Valley 2/1/21 Approved 17-0
Camelback East 2/2/21 Approved 18-0
Desert View 2/2/21 Approved 7-0




Page 414 2/3/2021
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-8-20


Date of VPC Meeting January 11, 2020
Amend Chapter 2, Section 202 and Chapter 6,
Sections 623.D.124 and 627.D.92 of the Phoenix
Request Zoning Ordinance to address changes to the Arizona
Revised Statutes regarding marijuana regulations for
dispensaries
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 15-0


VPC DISCUSSION:

Chair Rachel Frazier Johnson joined the meeting during this item bringing the quorum
to 15.

Joshua Bednarek, Deputy Director of the Planning and Development Department
shared that in November 2020 voters passed the Smart and Safe Arizona Act (Prop.
207) which allowed the recreational use of marijuana and added regulations related to
the retail sale of marijuana at licensed establishments (marijuana establishments). Mr.
Bednarek reviewed the current zoning requirements for non-profit medical marijuana
establishments. Mr. Bednarek shared that the proposed text amendment is to add
definitions from the Arizona Revised Statute language for cannabis, industrial hemp,
marijuana, marijuana establishment and marijuana products and to permit marijuana
establishments as an accessory use to a non-profit medical marijuana dispensary. Mr.
Bednarek reviewed staff’s recommendation and the proposed timeline for public
hearings.

Dana Johnson asked for clarification on medical marijuana establishments being
accessory to medical marijuana dispensaries or if they could be standalone, and which
zoning districts allowed dispensaries, and if they are allowed downtown. Mr. Bednarek
replied that this proposal is to allow marijuana establishments as an accessory use to
medical marijuana facilities in order to have requirements in place before the State
begins to issue licenses, and that it doesn’t preclude them from revisiting the ordinance
requirements at a later date.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882

Page 415
Central City Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-TA-8-20
January 20, 2021
Page 2


Ryan Boyd stated that medical marijuana has very restrictive uses as asked why it has
so many restrictions. Mr. Bednarek replied that when the Mayor and City Council
approved the medical marijuana requirements, they felt it was the most appropriate
framework for that use and there could be a need to review those requirements in the
future.

Public Comment:
None.

Motion:
Dana Johnson motioned to recommend approval of Z-TA-8-20, per the staff
recommendation. Darlene Martinez seconded the motion.

Discussion:
Ryan Boyd commented that the requirements for marijuana uses are too restrictive
and hoped that there can be a follow-up text amendment to make it less restrictive.
Committee members Gaona, Johnson, Martinez and Rainey echoed Mr. Boyd’s
comment.

Vote
15-0, Motion to approve Z-TA-8-20 per the staff recommendation passed, with
Committee Members Boyd, Burns, Colyer, Dubasik, Gaona, Johnson, Lockhart,
Martinez, Olivas, Panetta, Rainey, Stark, Starks, Sonoskey and R. Johnson in favor.



STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 416
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-8-20

Date of VPC Meeting January 11, 2021
Request Amend Chapter 2, Section 202 and Chapter 6, Sections
623.D.124 and 627.D.92 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance
to address changes to the Arizona Revised Statutes
regarding marijuana regulations for dispensaries.

VPC Recommendation Approve, per staff recommendation.
VPC Vote 8-0-1


VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

Committee member Branscomb recused himself from this agenda item due to a conflict
of interest.

Ms. Tricia Gomes, Zoning Administrator of the Phoenix Planning and Development
Department, provided an overview of the request, explaining that it is in response to the
Smart and Safe Arizona Act that was approved on November 3, 2020. This amended
Title 36 of the Arizona Revised Statures by adding Chapter 28.2 and added regulations
related to the retail sale of marijuana at licensed establishments. Currently, non-profit
medical marijuana establishments are permitted in the C-2, C-3, A-1, and A-2 districts
subject to several conditions and require a use permit. They are also limited to a
maximum of 5,000 square feet of net floor area. The proposed Text Amendment would
all definitions to the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance that mirror the language in the A.R.S for
the following terms: cannabis, industrial hemp, marijuana, marijuana establishment, and
marijuana products. It will also permit marijuana establishments as an accessory use to
a non-profit medical marijuana dispensary. She presented the staff recommendation for
approval, per the language in the staff report provided.

MOTION

Ms. Jennifer Rouse moved to approve the request per the staff recommendation. Ms.
Cinthia Estela seconded the motion.

VOTE
8-0-1, Motion to approve, with committee members Glass, Abegg, Estela, Flunoy,
Harlin, Hurd, Ortega, and Rouse in favor, and committee member Branscomb
abstaining.




Page 417
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-8-20

Date of VPC Meeting January 12, 2021
Request Amend Chapter 2, Section 202 and Chapter 6, Sections
623.D.124 and 627.D.92 of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance to address changes to the Arizona Revised
Statutes regarding marijuana regulations for
dispensaries.
VPC Recommendation Approval
VPC Vote 4-0

VPC DISCUSSION:

Tricia Gomes provided an overview on the proposed text amendment, noting the
current regulations for medical marijuana and the proposed regulations for
recreational marijuana as accessory to existing medical marijuana facilities.

Ozzie Virgil asked how medical and recreational marijuana businesses will be
separated. Will the businesses come back at a later time and ask for additional area?
Tricia Gomes responded that the current proposal would not change any of the
current spacing or size standards. The text amendment is only to comply with state
law. Operations regarding how overall space is devoted to each business will be left
up to the operator.

Chair Massimo Sommacampagna asked for clarification on if the medical
dispensaries were being allowed accessory retail sales. Tricia Gomes confirmed that
recreational use would only be accessory and not standalone explaining that the city
cannot prohibit existing facilities to converting to recreational operations.

Vice Chair Steven Scharboneau commented that as he understood the law, a city
could ban the use but recreational sales would still be permitted in existing medical
facilities.

Judy Lorch asked what would happen if the medical facility went out of business.
Tricia Gomes responded that the recreational component would need to close.

No public comments were received for this item.

Vice Chair Steven Scharboneau commented that this was a mandatory step to
comply with state law and thought it was pretty straightforward.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 418
Rio Vista Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
January 12, 2021

MOTION: Vice Chair Steven Scharboneau made a motion to approve as presented.
The motion was seconded by Judy Lorch.

VOTE: 4-0 with Committee Members Sommacampagna, Scharboneau, Lorch and
Virgil in favor.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 419
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-8-20

Date of VPC Meeting January 12, 2021
Request Amend Chapter 2, Section 202 and Chapter 6, Sections
623.D.124 and 627.D.92 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance
to address changes to the Arizona Revised Statutes
regarding marijuana regulations for dispensaries.

VPC Recommendation Approve, per staff recommendation with modifications.
VPC Vote 10-0 Motion passes; none in dissent or abstention.

VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDATION:


No requests to speak from the public were received on this item.

Joshua Bednarek, Deputy Director in the Planning and Development
Department, introduced himself and this citywide text amendment under case
Z-TA-8-20 that arose from the passage of Proposition 207 also known as the
Responsible Adult Use of Marijuana (Smart and Safe Arizona Act) in 2020. This
proposition amends Title 36 of the Arizona Revised Statutes and incorporates
regulations related to the retail sales of marijuana at licensed establishments. He
discussed the current standards in the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance applicable to
non-profit medical marijuana dispensaries. The current text amendment proposal
would allow retail marijuana establishments only as an accessory use to a non-
profit medical marijuana dispensary and would add several definitions which
mirror the Arizona Revised Statutes in the Zoning Ordinance for several terms.
He added that staff recommends approval of this text amendment subject to the
language found in Exhibit A of the staff report and concluded his presentation by
discussing the meeting schedule for this proposed text amendment.

Member Kassandra Alvarez left the meeting at 6:20pm bringing the quorum to 10
members.

Gene Holmerud asked for additional clarification on the text amendment.

Greg Brownell asked if existing medical marijuana cultivation facilities would be
permitted to operate as a retail marijuana establishment.

Mr. Bednarek responded that cultivation and sales are two different uses. The
current proposal only allows retail marijuana establishments as an accessory use




Page 420
to a medical marijuana facility. He explained that retail sales and cultivation are
not considered to be the same land use.

Marcia Busching asked if state law allows retail sales of marijuana to operate as
a primary use.

Mr. Bednarek responded that state law allows the regulation of retail marijuana
establishments to be no more stringent than medical marijuana retail
establishments. Currently, staff is seeking a streamlined approach to address the
passage of Proposition 207 given the limited timeline.

Ms. Busching stated that the proposed text amendment language hinders
business competition and thus anti-competitive.

Shelly Smith stated that the process could discriminate against smaller
corporations. He provided an example of phone companies which flooded the
market decades ago and added that the nuance will wear away.

Mr. Bednarek responded that he appreciates the comments provided and
welcomes recommended modifications to the text amendment language
proposed.

Tamala Daniels asked how the South Mountain Village compares to other
villages in terms of sentiment to the proposal. She asked what some of the
zoning districts are where retail marijuana establishment could locate in the
South Mountain Village.

Mr. Bednarek discussed a previous text amendment case which proposed to
increase the maximum size of medical marijuana establishments. He added that
each Village varies in terms of the existing zoning and where certain protected
uses are located from these properties. The properties along Broadway Road are
designated as commercial or industrial zoning in some locations which could
allow for retail marijuana establishments as proposed by this text amendment.

Chairwoman Trites asked if the state has a limit on the maximum number of
licenses that it can issue for retail marijuana establishments.

Mr. Bednarek responded that the state will issue licenses for retail marijuana
establishments as a ratio to the number of medical marijuana licenses issued.
Now, there are approximately 54 medical marijuana dispensaries spread across
the City of Phoenix.

Chairwoman Trites asked how many dispensaries are there now in the South
Mountain Village and stated that she shares the same concerns as Shelly Smith.
She asked if there were other opportunities for the public to comment on the
location of marijuana dispensaries.




Page 421
Mr. Bednarek responded that he does not have the number of marijuana
dispensary licenses issued in the South Mountain Village and added that through
the use permit process, public notification and comment are part of this process.

George Brooks asked if this was a city-wide text amendment.

Mr. Bednarek responded that this was a city-wide text amendment.

Mr. Brownell stated that the idea of separating marijuana facilities as part of the
text amendment which approved medical marijuana establishments originated in
the South Mountain Village. He discussed concerns with the proposal.

Mr. Bednarek responded that the proposed text amendment does not modify the
existing separation requirements for marijuana establishments. He added that
there is not much existing land that meets the appropriate zoning requirements
across the city which allows these types of facilities.

Muriel Smith stated that she has concerns with locating marijuana
establishments near protected uses.

Mr. Bednarek responded that the separation requirements for marijuana
establishments are not proposed to be changed with this text amendment.

Chairwoman Trites stated that given no public comment, she would entertain
further discussion or a motion on this agenda item.

DISCUSSION
Ms. Busching stated that she would be willing to make a motion to approve case
Z-TA-8-20 per the staff recommendation, deleting any references requiring
marijuana establishments to be an accessory use to a medical marijuana
dispensary. Rather, to allow marijuana establishments as a primary use.

MOTION
Ms. Busching made a motion to approve text amendment case Z-TA-8-20 per the
staff recommendation in Exhibit A, with a modification to allow marijuana
establishments as a primary use and not as an accessory use to a medical
marijuana dispensary. Mr. Holmerud seconded the motion.

VOTE:
10-0 Motion passes; None in dissent.


STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:

The South Mountain Village Planning Committee voted to approve the proposed text
amendment case Z-TA-8-20 per the language in Exhibit A proposed by staff, with a




Page 422
modification to allow marijuana establishments as a primary use and not as an
accessory use to a medical marijuana dispensary. No details were provided whether to
amend any of the other requirements proposed in Exhibit A to apply to marijuana
establishments such as separation requirements, use permit requirements and zoning
district requirements.




Page 423
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-8-20

Date of VPC Meeting January 13, 2021
Request Amend Chapter 2, Section 202 and Chapter 6,
Sections 623.D.124 and 627.D.92 of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance to address changes to the Arizona
Revised Statutes regarding marijuana regulations for
dispensaries
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 9-1


VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

Joshua Bednarek, Deputy Director of the Planning and Development Department
shared that in November 2020 voters passed the Smart and Safe Arizona Act (Prop.
207) which allowed the recreational use of marijuana and added regulations related to
the retail sale of marijuana at licensed establishments (marijuana establishments). Mr.
Bednarek reviewed the current zoning requirements for non-profit medical marijuana
establishments. Mr. Bednarek shared that the proposed text amendment is to add
definitions from the Arizona Revised Statute language for cannabis, industrial hemp,
marijuana, marijuana establishment and marijuana products and to permit marijuana
establishments as an accessory use to a non-profit medical marijuana dispensary. Mr.
Bednarek reviewed staff’s recommendation and the proposed timeline for public
hearings.

Vice Chair Gene Derie asked where these marijuana establishments would be located,
if non-profit medical marijuana establishments are allowed in C-2, C-3, A-1 and A-2-
zoned parcels and if it would be allowed if the medical marijuana establishment was a
separate buildings. Mr. Bednarek replied that the marijuana establishments would only
be permitted as an accessory use to a non-profit medical marijuana dispensary and
would be subject to the same restrictions in terms of zoning and separation
requirements, and that if was separate it wouldn’t not be considered an accessory use
and part of the same establishment.

Motion:
Jeff O’Toole motioned to recommend approval of Z-TA-8-20. Vice Chair Gene Derie
seconded the motion.

Discussion:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 424
Vote:
9-1, Motion to approve passes with Committee Members Battle, Demarest, DuBose,
Hernandez, O’Toole, Sirochman, Valenzuela, Derie and Armor in favor and Committee
member Barba opposed.


STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 425
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-8-20

Date of VPC Meeting January 14, 2021
Request Amend Chapter 2, Section 202 and Chapter 6, Sections
623.D.124 and 627.D.92 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance
to address changes to the Arizona Revised Statutes
regarding marijuana regulations for dispensaries.

VPC Recommendation Approve, per staff recommendation.
VPC Vote 13-0, motion to recommend approval passed, with
Committee Members Grossman, DiLeo, Davenport,
Fergis, Gardner, Greenburg, Kenney, Levy, Lewis,
Osborne, Romero, Shipman and Virgil in favor.
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

No requests to speak from the public were received on this item.

STAFF PRESENTATION

Ms. Tricia Gomes, City of Phoenix Zoning Administrator, introduced herself and
this citywide text amendment under case Z-TA-8-20 that arose from the passage
of Proposition 207 also known as the Responsible Adult Use of Marijuana (Smart
and Safe Arizona Act) in 2020. This proposition amends Title 36 of the Arizona
Revised Statutes and incorporates regulations related to the retail sales of
marijuana at licensed establishments. He discussed the current standards in the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance applicable to non-profit medical marijuana
dispensaries. The current text amendment proposal would allow retail marijuana
establishments only as an accessory use to a non-profit medical marijuana
dispensary and would add several definitions which mirror the Arizona Revised
Statutes in the Zoning Ordinance for several terms. She added that staff
recommends approval of this text amendment subject to the language found in
Exhibit A of the staff report and concluded his presentation by discussing the
meeting schedule for this proposed text amendment.

Mr. Bill Levy asked if there was a different price scale between medical and
recreational marijuana.

Ms. Gomes shared that she did not know.

Mr. Levy stated that he was curious about the tax structure as well as limits on
the amount a consumer could purchase.




Page 426
Ms. Gomes stated that these inquires can be addressed by the State of Arizona
as they are the regulators.

Mr. Ozzie Virgil shared that the updates were written by the medical marijuana
lawyers.

Ms. Gomes reiterated that this is under State jurisdiction.

Mr. Russell Osborn asked if there were changes to the separation requirements.

Ms. Gomes shared that no standards were changing, just adding required
definitions and language related to the proposition.

Chairman Joseph Grossman asked if existing medical marijuana facilities that
are opting to also incorporate the recreation sales would be required to send out
notifications to surrounding property owners informing them of the change in use.

Ms. Gomes shared that existing medical marijuana facilities would not be
required to send out notifications unless they are expanding floor area to
accommodate the additional recreation sales.

Chairman Grossman stated that the clientele may change due to the
recreational facet of the use, but understands the separation and notification
requirements and thanked Ms. Gomes for the clarification.

Ms. Gomes reiterated that the conversion language was written into the
proposition.

MOTION: Mr. Ozzie Virgil motioned to recommend approval per staff’s
recommendation for Text Amendment Case No. Z-TA-8-20. Committee member
Mr. Russell Osborn seconded the motion.

VOTE: 13-0, motion to recommend approval passed, with Committee
Members Grossman, DiLeo, Davenport, Fergis, Gardner, Greenburg,
Kenney, Levy, Lewis, Osborne, Romero, Shipman and Virgil in favor.

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:

None.




Page 427
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-8-20


Date of VPC Meeting January 14, 2021
Amend Chapter 2, Section 202 and Chapter 6,
Sections 623.D.124 and 627.D.92 of the Phoenix
Request Zoning Ordinance to address changes to the Arizona
Revised Statutes regarding marijuana regulations for
dispensaries.
VPC Recommendation Approval
VPC Vote 6-0


VPC DISCUSSION:

Joshua Bednarek provided an overview on the proposed text amendment, noting the
current regulations for medical marijuana and the proposed regulations for recreational
marijuana as accessory to existing medical marijuana facilities.

Committee Member Steve Tucker asked staff to clarify the zoning districts that
permitted marijuana dispensaries, noting that the presentation included C-3 and A-2
districts, yet the text included in the staff report only indicated changes to C-2 and A-1
districts. He also asked for clarification on if additional state applications will be
accepted later. Joshua Bednarek responded that the zoning regulations applied to
more intense districts so a change to C-2 would also cover a C-3 zone. In regard to
new applications, the city is not sure if the state will allow new applications after initial
licensing, but any new facilities will need to follow a jurisdiction’s standards.

Chair Jason Stokes asked how other villages had responded to the request. Joshua
Bednarek responded that the South Mountain Village recommended approval for
standalone facilities while Central City recommended approval per the staff
recommendation.

No public comments were made on the item.

Motion:
Vice Chair Shannon Simon moved to approve per the staff recommendation.
Committee Member Michelle Ricart seconded the motion.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 428
Z-TA-8-20

Vote:
The committee voted 6-0 to approve the motion with members Stokes, Simon, Read,
Ricart, Tome and Tucker in favor.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 429
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-8-20

Date of VPC Meeting January 19, 2021
Request Amend Chapter 2, Section 202 and Chapter 6, Sections
623.D.124 and 627.D.92 of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance to address changes to the Arizona Revised
Statutes regarding marijuana regulations for
dispensaries.

VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation.



VPC Vote 6-0 Motion passes; none in dissent or abstention.

VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDATION:

No requests to speak from members of the public were received.

Joshua Bednarek, Deputy Director in the Planning and Development Department,
introduced himself and this citywide text amendment under case
Z-TA-8-20 that arose from the passage of Proposition 207 also known as the
Responsible Adult Use of Marijuana (Smart and Safe Arizona Act) in 2020. This
proposition amends Title 36 of the Arizona Revised Statutes and incorporates
regulations related to the retail sales of marijuana at licensed establishments. He
discussed the current standards in the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance applicable to non-
profit medical marijuana dispensaries. The current text amendment proposal would
allow retail marijuana establishments only as an accessory use to a non-profit
medical marijuana dispensary and would add several definitions which mirror the
Arizona Revised Statutes in the Zoning Ordinance for several terms. He added that
staff recommends approval of this text amendment subject to the language found in
Exhibit A of the staff report and concluded his presentation by discussing the
meeting schedule for this proposed text amendment.

Chairman Cardenas asked for committee member comments or questions.

Mr. Dan Rush asked if the proposed text amendment prohibits new marijuana
establishments and if the proposed text amendment gives an advantage to existing
establishments.

Mr. Bednarek responded that the text amendment language proposed would only
allow marijuana establishments as an accessory use to a medical marijuana
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 430
dispensary. He added that state law prohibits municipalities from adopting stricter
regulations for marijuana establishments than currently apply to medical marijuana
dispensaries.

Chairman Cardenas opened and closed the public comment portion of the meeting.
He asked for further discussion or a motion on this case.

DISCUSSION:
None.

MOTION:

Ms. Cartwright motioned to approve case Z-TA-8-20 per the staff recommendation
presented in Exhibit A of the staff report. Mr. Cardenas seconded the motion to
approve.

VOTE:
6-0, motion passed; None in dissent.


STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 431
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-8-20

Date of VPC Meeting January 20, 2021
Request Amend Chapter 2, Section 202 and Chapter 6, Sections
623.D.124 and 627.D.92 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance
to address changes to the Arizona Revised Statutes
regarding marijuana regulations for dispensaries.

VPC Recommendation Approve, per staff recommendation.
VPC Vote 13-1-1, motion passes, with Church, Argiro, Carrell,
Larson, Magallanez, McBride, O’Hara, Perez, Alauria,
Whitney, Wiedoff, Vice Chair Jaramillo, and Chair Krentz
in favor; Viedmark in dissent; and Barraza in abstention.


VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

No requests to speak from the public were received on this item.

Viedmark arrived bringing the quorum to 15 members (11 being required)

STAFF PRESENTATION

Tricia Gomes, Zoning Administrator of the Planning and Development
Department shared that in November 2020 voters passed the Smart and Safe
Arizona Act (Prop. 207) which allowed the recreational use of marijuana and
added regulations related to the retail sale of marijuana at licensed
establishments (marijuana establishments). The current zoning requirements for
non-profit medical marijuana establishments. The proposed text amendment is to
add definitions from the Arizona Revised Statute language for cannabis,
industrial hemp, marijuana, marijuana establishment and marijuana products and
to permit marijuana establishments as an accessory use to a non-profit medical
marijuana dispensary. The staff recommendation is to approve, and she then
reviewed the proposed timeline for public hearings.

QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE

Argiro asked about what would happen if the committee elected to deny the
request tonight? Gomes responded that if the City of Phoenix did not adopt
regulations it would be in non-compliance with State Law which has legal
penalties.




Page 432
Alauria requested clarification on if the proposed language would require
recreational clinics be in the same space as medical marijuana facilities. Gomes
responded that the proposed language would only permit a recreational facility as
an accessory to a medical marijuana facility.

Viedmark stated that she had been following marijuana regulations for the past
five years and understood that once recreational was legalized that the existing
medical facilities would have a head-start but that she didn’t expect that those
facilities would be the only facilities permitted for recreational. She inquired if this
understanding is correct and whether there are implications regarding security,
money handling, tax revenues, and separation requirements for new recreational
or dual license facilities. Gomes responded that licensure and security
requirements are handled by the State for both medical and recreational facilities.
The proposition specified how revenue would be allocated meaning that part of
the operation will be different between medical and recreational sales. Under the
new law, existing medical dispensaries have the first opportunity to apply for a
dual license and there are requirements in place such as the dispensary needing
to be in good standing. The number of medical dispensary licenses was based
on a proportion to the number of pharmacies and this method is carried forward
with regard to recreational dispensaries.

Viedmark inquired about the implications for medical facilities that had received
zoning adjustments to modify the separation requirements. Gomes responded
that the separation requirements are not changing for medical dispensaries and
that recreational dispensaries which are permitted only as an accessory, would
therefore be subject to the same separation requirements. She further opined
that some medical dispensaries have their Use Permits tied to an individual
building or suite footprint rather than the property boundary meaning that the
additional floor area needed to accommodate the addition of recreational use
which could thereby create a conflict with separation requirements; in this case, a
variance and an amended Use Permit would be required.

Perez asked if the proposed text amendment changes the previously issued text
amendment regarding square footage and whether this text amendment will
disproportionately impact black and brown communities. Gomes responded that
the text amendment does not change the previous text amendment, nor does it
change the previously established locational criteria for new medical marijuana
establishments.

PUBLIC COMMENTS

None.

FLOOR/PUBLIC DISCUSSION CLOSED: MOTION, DISCUSSION, AND VOTE




Page 433
Discussion
Jaramillo asked if there had been any case studies on the projected impact of
the newly legalized recreational marijuana when coupled with the newly enlarged
maximum footprint of medical marijuana facilities. He noted that several other
states run similar programs.

Viedmark noted that she is not supportive of marijuana facilities and will be
voting in opposition to the request.

Motion
Carrell moved to approve the request per staff recommendation. Fitzgerald
seconded the motion.

VOTE: 13-1-1, motion passes, with Church, Argiro, Carrell, Larson, Magallanez,
McBride, O’Hara, Perez, Alauria, Whitney, Wiedoff, Vice Chair Jaramillo, and
Chair Krentz in favor; Viedmark in dissent; and Barraza in abstention.

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:

None




Page 434
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-8-20

Date of VPC Meeting January 25, 2021

Request Amend Chapter 2, Section 202 and Chapter 6, Sections
623.D.124 and 627.D.92 of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance to address changes to the Arizona Revised
Statutes regarding marijuana regulations for
dispensaries.

VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 10-0-1; None in opposition; Mr. Benezra abstained.


VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDATION:

No requests to speak from the public were received on this item.

Ms. Tricia Gomes, Zoning Administrator in the Planning and Development
Department, introduced herself and this citywide text amendment under case
Z-TA-8-20 that arose from the passage of Proposition 207 also known as the
Responsible Adult Use of Marijuana (Smart and Safe Arizona Act) in 2020. This
proposition amends Title 36 of the Arizona Revised Statutes and incorporates
regulations related to the retail sales of marijuana at licensed establishments. She
discussed the current standards in the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance applicable to non-
profit medical marijuana dispensaries. The current text amendment proposal would
allow retail marijuana establishments only as an accessory use to a non-profit
medical marijuana dispensary and would add several definitions which mirror the
Arizona Revised Statutes in the Zoning Ordinance for several terms. She added that
staff recommends approval of this text amendment subject to the language found in
Exhibit A of the staff report and concluded his presentation by discussing the
meeting schedule for this proposed text amendment. Additionally, the state has
issued approximately 86 licenses to retailers thus far for the sale of recreational
marijuana.

Chairman Elliott asked for committee member questions or comments regarding
the presentation. He then asked what would happen if the city did not approve this
proposed text amendment.



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882

Page 435
Ms. Gomes responded that the city would be out of compliance with state law and
be at risk of loosing its share of state revenue funds.

Chairman Elliott asked for further discussion or a motion on this item, given no
questions from the committee or comments from the public.

MOTION

Mr. Scott Crouch made a motion to approve the item per the staff recommendation.
Mr. Carlos Hernandez de Pena seconded the motion.

VOTE:

10-0-1 Motion passed; no members dissented; Mr. Alexander Benezra abstained.

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 436
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-8-20

Date of VPC Meeting January 26, 2021
Request Amend Chapter 2, Section 202 and Chapter 6, Sections
623.D.124 and 627.D.92 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance
to address changes to the Arizona Revised Statutes
regarding marijuana regulations for dispensaries.

VPC Recommendation Approve, per staff recommendation.
VPC Vote 16-1-0, motion passes with Smith, Becker, Farina,
Ammon, Ender, Fitzgerald, Keyser, Kreitor, LeBlanc,
Sanchez, Jones, Solorio, McCabe, Bryck, Vice Chair
Williams, and Chair Shore in favor; Adams in dissent; and
none in abstention.

VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

No requests to speak from the public were received on this item.

STAFF PRESENTATION

Joshua Bednarek, Deputy Director of the Planning and Development
Department, shared that in November 2020 voters passed the Smart and Safe
Arizona Act (Prop. 207) which allowed the recreational use of marijuana and
added regulations related to the retail sale of marijuana at licensed
establishments (marijuana establishments). The current zoning requirements for
non-profit medical marijuana establishments. The proposed text amendment is to
add definitions from the Arizona Revised Statute language for cannabis,
industrial hemp, marijuana, marijuana establishment and marijuana products and
to permit marijuana establishments as an accessory use to a non-profit medical
marijuana dispensary. The staff recommendation is to approve, and he then
reviewed the proposed timeline for public hearings.

QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE

Adams and McCabe asked for confirmation that the text amendment would only
permit recreational facilities as an accessory to medical facilities. Bednarek
confirmed and stated that the issue may be evaluated more holistically in a future
text amendment.




Page 437
Adams asked about the origin of the separation requirements currently in the
ordinance. Bednarek responded that the city evaluated what other cities were
doing for medical marijuana facilities and the existing separation requirements for
other uses already addressed in the ordinance. He added that the city needed to
be thoughtful with these distances because the code would have been
invalidated if it essentially prohibited the uses city-wide.

Ender raised the issue of traffic congestion at a medical facility near 10th Street
and Camelback Road and inquired whether this is a common issue and if there is
a mechanism for addressing issues as they arise. Bednarek responded that the
city has not seen widespread traffic issues related to medical marijuana facilities.
Issues sometimes arise pertaining to the characteristics of the site, regardless of
use, and these issues can be handled through the Neighborhood Services
Department.

Jones asked if the text amendment is procedural because the State has already
ruled on the topic and the implications if the city were to not adopt regulations
that mirror state law. Bednarek responded that the text amendment would bring
the city into compliance with state law and that non-compliance would open the
city up to penalties and investigation by the Attorney General’s Office.

Vice Chair Williams asked whether the text amendment and the added
definitions for “Cannabis” would bring the city into conflict with the Arizona
Criminal Code which defines it as being illegal. Bednarek responded that he is
not familiar with implications within the state code but noted that the text
amendment includes the language as included in Proposition 207.

Ammon asked what the peer communities are doing and whether this text
amendment seeks to differentiate Phoenix from its regional peers. Bednarek
responded that most communities are trying to come into compliance but that
larger conversations may occur in the future.

PUBLIC COMMENTS

None.

FLOOR/PUBLIC DISCUSSION CLOSED: MOTION, DISCUSSION, AND VOTE

Motion
McCabe moved to approve the request per staff recommendation. Fitzgerald
seconded the motion.

VOTE: 16-1-0, motion passes with Smith, Becker, Farina, Ammon, Ender,
Fitzgerald, Keyser, Kreitor, LeBlanc, Sanchez, Jones, Solorio, McCabe, Bryck,
Vice Chair Williams, and Chair Shore in favor; Adams in dissent; and none in
abstention.




Page 438
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:

None.




Page 439
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-8-20

Date of VPC Meeting January 20, 2021
Request Amend Chapter 2, Section 202 and Chapter 6, Sections
623.D.124 and 627.D.92 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance
to address changes to the Arizona Revised Statutes
regarding marijuana regulations for dispensaries.

VPC Recommendation Approve, per staff recommendation with conditions
VPC Vote 12-1-0; motion passed with Cothron, Searles, Rodriguez,
Jewett, Coates, Matthews, Ressler, George, Procaccini,
Vice Chair Bryck, and Chair Kleinman in favor; Benjamin
in dissent; and none abstention.


VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

No speaker cards were received on this item.

At this time, Cothron and Procaccini arrived bringing the quorum to 13 members
(8 being required).

STAFF PRESENTATION

Joshua Bednarek, Deputy Director of the Planning and Development
Department, shared that in November 2020 voters passed the Smart and Safe
Arizona Act (Prop. 207) which allowed the recreational use of marijuana and
added regulations related to the retail sale of marijuana at licensed
establishments (marijuana establishments). The current zoning requirements for
non-profit medical marijuana establishments. The proposed text amendment is to
add definitions from the Arizona Revised Statute language for cannabis,
industrial hemp, marijuana, marijuana establishment and marijuana products and
to permit marijuana establishments as an accessory use to a non-profit medical
marijuana dispensary. The staff recommendation is to approve, and he then
reviewed the proposed timeline for public hearings.

QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE

Jewett and Ressler asked whether this is being done to bring the city into
compliance with state law, if there are other options, and what other cities are
doing.




Page 440
• Bednarek responded that this text amendment is limited in scope and is
intended to bring the City into compliance but that the city will be able to
reopen the issue in a future text amendment to evaluate the issue more
holistically. If the city were to not approve a text amendment, it would be
out of compliance with state law which would open the city to penalties.
Many other cities are taking a similar approach to simply come into
compliance as a first step but that a few are taking steps to prohibit new
medical and recreational facilities.

Kleinman stated that licenses are currently being granted and asked if these are
considered legal in the City of Phoenix.
• Bednarek responded that the State can issue licenses but that new
facilities are still required to meet municipal requirements. As a first step,
the state is issuing dual-license permissions to existing medical marijuana
facilities which would generally be permitted by the text amendment.

Benjamin stated that Proposition 207 permits additional licenses for those
harmed by previous laws.

Wagner stated that the current 365 day review required for operating medical
marijuana facilities is too slow to catch and resolve issues and that a 6 month
review would be preferred for both medical and recreational dispensaries. She
stated that the addition of a recreational component would increase the number
of patrons passing through a given facility. She asked if a Use Permit or Use
Permit Amendment would be required for all operations adding a recreational
license.
Bednarek responded that the text amendment would permit new
recreational dispensaries only as an accessory to a medical marijuana
facility and that medical marijuana facilities require a Use Permit.

The question of whether a Use Permit or amendment would be required
depends on the conditions of the Use Permit for the medical facility. If the
dual license requires that the facility expand beyond the area approved for
the medical facility a Use Permit would be required for the expansion,
however, if no expansion is required to the footprint of the Use Permit, is is
conceivable that a dual license facility would not require a new or
amended Use Permit.

He stated that the committee can add a 6 month review provision to the
recommendation but advised that it would need to be vetted through the
Law Department to legality and enforceability of the additional
requirement.

Searles agreed with Wagner on the appropriateness of a 6 month review and
added that he would like to see dispensaries work with the neighborhoods on




Page 441
how to be a good neighbor. He asked for confirmation that the text amendment
would only permit recreational facilities as an accessory to a medical facility.
Bednarek responded that the text amendment would only permit dual
license facilities with recreational as an accessory to a medical facility.
Benjamin responded that the language in state law opens up the state
further to new recreational facilities.

Ressler agreed with Searles and Wagner regarding a 6 month review and asked
if the addition of a recreational component would, or should, prompt additional
requirements for parking.
Bednarek responded that the text amendment does not specifically
require additional parking or development standards for all dual license
facilities but that specific standards would apply on a case by case
scenario; for example, some facilities would not be required to add
additional parking or meet additional standards if they do not need to
expand their floor area to accommodate the additional use.

Procaccini agreed with his fellow committee members regarding the 6 month
review. He asked if this is intended as a stop-gap measure and if the situation
would be evaluated more fully in the future because he would like to see the city
consider allowing recreational dispensaries as a stand along use. He expressed
concern that requiring additional development standards could result in buildings
being demolished for dispensary parking, like near 10th Street and Camelback
Road.
Bednarek responded that the current text amendment is limited in scope
and would bring the city into compliance with state law by permitting
recreational facilities only as an accessory to a medical dispensary. The
issue can be evaluated more fully in a future text amendment.

George stated that the addition of a recreational element to a medical dispensary
will likely increase the number of patrons significantly and she therefore supports
a shorter review window for Use Permits.

Chair Kleinman asked about the recourse for facilities operating under a use
permit that create problems. Bednarek responded that the main test is that they
not produce a negative impact and he noted that Use Permits can be revoked by
the ZAHO and ZBA,

PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.

STAFF RESPONSE
None.

FLOOR/PUBLIC COMMENT CLOSED: DISCUSSION, MOTION AND VOTE




Page 442
Motion
Wagner motioned to approve the request per staff recommendation on the
condition that recreational dispensaries be required to obtain a Use Permit and
that Use Permit is subject to a 6-month review. Second by Searles.

Discussion
Benjamin stated that he does not believe the additional requirements are legal
or enforceable.

Chair Kleinman stated that Benjamin is likely correct but he would like to for the
legal department to consider the recommendation of the VPC.

Vote
12-1-0; motion passed with Cothron, Searles, Rodriguez, Jewett, Coates,
Matthews, Ressler, George, Procaccini, Vice Chair Bryck, and Chair
Kleinman in favor; Benjamin in dissent; and none abstention.


STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:

As stated by staff during the meeting, the additional conditions recommended by the
committee should be reviewed by the Law for legal and enforceability issues.




Page 443
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-8-20

Date of VPC Meeting February 1, 2021
Request Amend Chapter 2, Section 202 and Chapter 6, Sections
623.D.124 and 627.D.92 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance
to address changes to the Arizona Revised Statutes
regarding marijuana regulations for dispensaries.

VPC Recommendation Approve, per staff recommendation.
VPC Vote 17-0 with committee members Balderrama, Belous,
Cantor, Gerst, Goodhue, Hall, Maggiore, Mazza,
Mortensen, Popovic, Severs, Sparks, Stewart, Ward,
Wise, Gubser and Lesher in favor.
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

No requests to speak from the public were received on this item.

STAFF PRESENTATION

Ms. Tricia Gomes, City of Phoenix Zoning Administrator, introduced herself and
this citywide text amendment under case Z-TA-8-20 that arose from the passage
of Proposition 207 also known as the Responsible Adult Use of Marijuana (Smart
and Safe Arizona Act) in 2020. This proposition amends Title 36 of the Arizona
Revised Statutes and incorporates regulations related to the retail sales of
marijuana at licensed establishments. He discussed the current standards in the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance applicable to non-profit medical marijuana
dispensaries. The current text amendment proposal would allow retail marijuana
establishments only as an accessory use to a non-profit medical marijuana
dispensary and would add several definitions which mirror the Arizona Revised
Statutes in the Zoning Ordinance for several terms. She added that staff
recommends approval of this text amendment subject to the language found in
Exhibit A of the staff report and concluded his presentation by discussing the
meeting schedule for this proposed text amendment.

Mr. Alex Popovic asked if the committee heard a case a few months ago
requesting to increase the square footage to make dispensaries larger. He also
asked if we could talk about licensing for medical versus recreational marijuana.

Ms. Gomes shared that this text amendment does not change standards. In
regard to dual licensing, if a business is in good standing with the State then they
can apply for both license types. The State mandates licensing.




Page 444
Mr. Robert Goodhue shared that a business can’t go from 5,000 to 10,000
square feet. The business can only max out at 5,000 square feet.

Ms. Gomes said yes, no standards are changing as a result of this text
amendment.

Mr. Paul Severs asked if a dual license does not mean a business will have
separate locations.

Ms. Toby Gerst asked if there was anything in this text amendment that has to
do with licensing.

Ms. Gomes reiterated that licensing is State mandated.

Ms. Jennifer Hall asked when they get their use permits renewed annually, is
this an automatic renewal on an annual basis.

Ms. Gerst asked if someone has a complaint about a medical marijuana facility,
where would it go.

Ms. Gomes shared that it would go to the Neighborhood Services Department.

MOTION:

Vice Chair Joe Lesher made a motion to recommend approval of Text
Amendment Case No. Z-TA-8-20, per staff’s recommendation.

Mr. Alex Popovic seconded the motion.

VOTE:

17-0 with committee members Balderrama, Belous, Cantor, Gerst, Goodhue,
Hall, Maggiore, Mazza, Mortensen, Popovic, Severs, Sparks, Stewart, Ward,
Wise, Gubser and Lesher in favor.

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:

None.




Page 445
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-8-20


Date of VPC Meeting February 2, 2021
Amend Chapter 2, Section 202 and Chapter 6,
Sections 623.D.124 and 627.D.92 of the Phoenix
Request Zoning Ordinance to address changes to the Arizona
Revised Statutes regarding marijuana regulations for
dispensaries.
VPC Recommendation Approval
VPC Vote 18-0


VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

Ms. Tricia Gomes, Zoning Administrator for the City of Phoenix, provided an overview
of the proposed text amendment, noting the current regulations for medical marijuana
and the proposed regulations for recreational marijuana as accessory to existing
medical marijuana facilities.

Motion:
Vice Chair William Fischbach made a motion to approve this request per the staff
recommendation. Mr. Vic Grace seconded the motion.

Vote: 18-0
Motion passes with committee members Swart, Fischbach, Abbott, Augusta, Bair,
Thraen, Eichelkraut, Garcia, Grace, McKee, Miller, Nye, O’Malley, Paceley, Rush,
Scher, Sharaby, and Tribken in favor.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 446
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-8-20

Date of VPC Meeting February 2, 2021
Request Amend Chapter 2, Section 202 and Chapter 6,
Sections 623.D.124 and 627.D.92 of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance to address changes to the Arizona
Revised Statutes regarding marijuana regulations for
dispensaries.
VPC Recommendation Approval
VPC Vote 7-0


VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

Joshua Bednarek provided an overview on the proposed text amendment, noting the
current regulations for medical marijuana and the proposed regulations for recreational
marijuana as accessory to existing medical marijuana facilities.

Rick Nowell commented on the existing distancing requirements for medical marijuana
facilities and noted that sometimes a private home becomes a dependent care facility.
Would this create any spacing issue problems with the code? Joshua Bednarek
responded that there would still be a restriction on single-family zoned property and that
buffer would apply regardless.

Jill Hankins commented that she was under the impression that other jurisdictions in
the valley had prohibited these facilities entirely. Can the facilities be prohibited in
Desert View? Joshua Bednarek said that some jurisdictions had passed ordinances
for no recreational marijuana. The city’s approach is consistent with state law because
we cannot restrict existing medical marijuana facilities from having recreational sales as
an accessory use.

MOTION: Vice Chair Lou Lagrave made a motion to approve as presented. The
motion was seconded by Rick Nowell.

VOTE: 7-0 with Committee Members Bowser, Lagrave, Barto, Hankins, Kollar, Nowell
and Powell in favor.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 447
Attachment D


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
February 4, 2021

ITEM NO: 6
DISTRICT NO.: Citywide
SUBJECT:

Application #: Z-TA-8-20 (Responsible Adult Use of Marijuana)
Proposal: Amend Chapter 2, Section 202 (Definitions) and Chapter 6,
Sections 623.D.124 (Commercial C-2 District—Intermediate
Commercial) and 627.D.92 (A-1 Light Industrial District) of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to address changes to the Arizona
Revised Statutes regarding responsible adult use of marijuana
(Smart and Safe Arizona Act)
Applicant: City of Phoenix Planning Commission
Owner: City of Phoenix Planning Commission
Representative: City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, as shown in Exhibit A.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendations:
Ahwatukee Foothills 1/25/2021 Approval. Vote: 10-0 (1 abstained).
Alhambra 1/26/2021 Approval. Vote: 16-1.
Camelback East 2/2/2021 Approval. Vote: 18-0.
Central City 1/11/2021 Approval. Vote: 15-0.
Deer Valley 1/14/2021 Approval. Vote: 13-0.
Desert View 2/2/2021 Approval. Vote: 7-0.
Encanto 2/1/2021 Approval with a modification. Vote 12-1.
Estrella 1/19/2021 Approval. Vote: 6-0.
Laveen 1/11/2021 Approval. Vote: 8-0 (1 abstained).
Maryvale 1/13/2021 Approval. Vote: 9-1.
North Gateway 1/14/2021 Approval. Vote: 6-0.
North Mountain 1/20/2021 Approval. Vote: 13-1 (1 abstained).
Paradise Valley 2/1/2021 Approval. Vote: 17-0.
Rio Vista 1/12/2021 Approval. Vote: 4-0.
South Mountain 1/12/2021 Approval, with a modification. Vote: 10-0.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the language in Exhibit A in the Staff
Report.

Motion Discussion: N/A.

Motion details: Commissioner Howard made a MOTION to approve Z-TA-8-20, per the
language in Exhibit A of the Staff Report.

Maker: Howard
Second: Gaynor
Vote: 7-0




Page 448
Absent: Johnson, Montalvo
Opposition Present: No

Findings:

1. The proposed text amendment creates a regulatory framework for marijuana
establishments by making them an accessory use to a non-profit medical
marijuana dispensary.

2. A comprehensive assessment of marijuana regulations will be reviewed in
the future, but the purpose of this text amendment is to update the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance to comply with the new A.R.S provisions prior to marijuana
establishment licenses becoming effective.

Proposed Language:

Amend Section 202 (Definitions) by adding the following new definitions in correct
alphabetical order:
***
CANNABIS: MEANS THE FOLLOWING SUBSTANCES UNDER WHATEVER NAMES
THEY MAY BE DESIGNATED:

1. THE RESIN EXTRACTED FROM ANY PART OF A PLANT OF THE GENUS
CANNABIS, AND EVERY COMPOUND, MANUFACTURE, SALT, DERIVATIVE,
MIXTURE OR PREPARATION OF SUCH PLANT, ITS SEEDS OR ITS RESIN.
CANNABIS DOES NOT INCLUDE OIL OR CAKE MADE FROM THE SEEDS OF
SUCH PLANT, ANY FIBER, COMPOUND, MANUFACTURE, SALT,
DERIVATIVE, MIXTURE OR PREPARATION OF THE MATURE STALKS OF
SUCH PLANT EXCEPT THE RESIN EXTRACTED FROM THE STALKS OR ANY
FIBER, OIL OR CAKE OR THE STERILIZED SEED OF SUCH PLANT WHICH IS
INCAPABLE OF GERMINATION.

2. EVERY COMPOUND, MANUFACTURE, SALT, DERIVATIVE, MIXTURE OR
PREPARATION OF SUCH RESIN OR TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL.
***
INDUSTRIAL HEMP: MEANS THE PLANT CANNABIS SATIVA L. AND ANY PART OF
SUCH A PLANT, WHETHER GROWING OR NOT, WITH A DELTA-9
TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL CONCENTRATION OF NOT MORE THAN THREE-
TENTHS PERCENT ON A DRY-WEIGHT BASIS.
***
MARIJUANA:

1. MEANS ALL PARTS OF THE PLANT OF THE GENUS CANNABIS, WHETHER
GROWING OR NOT, AS WELL AS THE SEEDS FROM THE PLANT, THE
RESIN EXTRACTED FROM ANY PART OF THE PLANT, AND EVERY
COMPOUND, MANUFACTURE, SALT, DERIVATIVE, MIXTURE OR
PREPARATION OF THE PLANT OR ITS SEEDS OR RESIN.




Page 449
2. DOES NOT INCLUDE INDUSTRIAL HEMP, THE FIBER PRODUCED FROM
THE STALKS OF THE PLANT OF THE GENUS CANNABIS, OIL OR CAKE
MADE FROM THE SEEDS OF THE PLANT, STERILIZED SEEDS OF THE
PLANT THAT ARE INCAPABLE OF GERMINATION, OR THE WEIGHT OF ANY
OTHER INGREDIENT COMBINED WITH MARIJUANA TO PREPARE TOPICAL
OR ORAL ADMINISTRATIONS, FOOD, DRINK OR OTHER PRODUCTS.
***
MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT: MEANS AN ENTITY LICENSED BY THE ARIZONA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES TO OPERATE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING:

1. A SINGLE RETAIL LOCATION AT WHICH THE LICENSEE MAY SELL
MARIJUANA AND MARIJUANA PRODUCTS TO CONSUMERS, CULTIVATE
MARIJUANA AND MANUFACTURE MARIJUANA PRODUCTS.

2. A SINGLE OFF-SITE CULTIVATION LOCATION AT WHICH THE LICENSEE MAY
CULTIVATE MARIJUANA, PROCESS MARIJUANA AND MANUFACTURE
MARIJUANA PRODUCTS, BUT FROM WHICH MARIJUANA AND MARIJUANA
PRODUCTS MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED OR SOLD TO CONSUMERS.

3. A SINGLE OFF-SITE LOCATION AT WHICH THE LICENSEE MAY
MANUFACTURE MARIJUANA PRODUCTS AND PACKAGE AND STORE
MARIJUANA AND MARIJUANA PRODUCTS, BUT FROM WHICH MARIJUANA
AND MARIJUANA PRODUCTS MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED OR SOLD TO
CONSUMERS.
***
MARIJUANA PRODUCTS: MEANS MARIJUANA CONCENTRATE AND PRODUCTS
THAT ARE COMPOSED OF MARIJUANA AND OTHER INGREDIENTS AND THAT
ARE INTENDED FOR USE OR CONSUMPTION, INCLUDING EDIBLE PRODUCTS,
OINTMENTS AND TINCTURES.
***
Amend Section 623.D.124 (Commercial C-2 District—Intermediate Commercial) to
read as follows:
***
D. Permitted Uses.
***
124. Nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary facility, subject to the following
conditions and limitations; failure to comply with the below regulations and
requirements is subject to revocation per Section 307.

a. A use permit shall be obtained in accordance with standards and
procedures of Section 307 and the following:

(1) Shall be reviewed every 365 calendar days.

(2) Provide name(s) and location(s) of the off-site cultivation
location.

(3) Include a copy of the operating procedures adopted in
compliance with Section 36-2804(B)(1)(c), Arizona Revised
Statutes.




Page 450
(4) A survey sealed by a registrant of the State of Arizona shall be
submitted to show compliance with the distance requirements
listed below.

b. Cultivation of medical marijuana is prohibited.

c. Shall be located in a closed building and may not be located in a
trailer, cargo container, motor vehicle or similar structure or
motorized or non-motorized vehicle.

d. Shall not exceed 5,000 square feet of COMBINED net floor area
dedicated exclusively to the nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary
AND MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT; this shall include all storage
areas, retail space and offices for the nonprofit medical marijuana
dispensary AND MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT.

e. Shall not be located within 5,280 feet of the same type of use or a
medical marijuana cultivation or infusion facility. This distance shall
be measured from the exterior wall of the building or portion thereof
in which the business is conducted or proposed to be conducted to
the nearest exterior wall or portion thereof of another medical
marijuana dispensary, cultivation, or infusion facility.

f. Shall not be located within 500 feet of the following residentially
zoned districts: S-1, S-2, RE-43, RE-35, R1-18, R1-14, R1-10, R1-8,
R1-6, R-2, R-3, R3-A, R-4, R-4A, R-5, and PAD-1 through PAD-15.
This distance shall be measured from the exterior walls of the
building or portion thereof in which the dispensary business is
conducted or proposed to be conducted to the zoning boundary line
of the residentially zoned district.

g. Shall not be located within 1,320 feet of a preschool, kindergarten,
elementary, secondary or high school, public park, public community
center, dependent care facility, homeless shelter, or youth
community center. This distance shall be measured from the exterior
walls of the building or portion thereof in which the dispensary
business is conducted or proposed to be conducted to the property
line of the protected use.

h. Shall not be located within 1,320 feet of a place of worship. This
distance shall be measured from the exterior walls of the building or
portion thereof in which the dispensary business is conducted or
proposed to be conducted to the property line of the place of
worship.

i. Shall have operating hours not earlier than 8:00 a.m. and not later
than 10:00 p.m.

j. Drive-through services are prohibited.




Page 451
k. There shall be no emission of dust, fumes, vapors or odors into the
environment from the premises.

L. THE RETAIL SALE OF MARIJUANA AND MARIJUANA PRODUCTS
TO CONSUMERS IN A MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT SHALL BE
PERMITTED AS ACCESSORY USE ONLY.
***
Amend Section 627.D.92 (A-1 Light Industrial District) to read as follows:
***
D. Permitted Uses.
***
92. Medical marijuana dispensary facility, subject to the following conditions
and limitations; failure to comply with the below regulations and
requirements is subject to revocation per Section 307:

a. A use permit shall be obtained in accordance with standards and
procedures of Section 307 of the Zoning Ordinance and the
following:

(1) Shall be reviewed every 365 calendar days.

(2) Provide name(s) and location(s) of the off-site cultivation
location.

(3) Include a copy of the operating procedures adopted in
compliance with Section 36-2804(B)(1)(c), Arizona Revised
Statutes.

(4) A survey sealed by a registrant of the State of Arizona shall be
submitted to show compliance with the distance requirements
listed below.

b. Shall be located in a closed building and may not be located in a
trailer, cargo container, motor vehicle or similar structure or
motorized or non-motorized vehicle.

c. Shall not exceed 5,000 square feet of COMBINED net floor area
DEDICATED EXCLUSIVELY TO THE NONPROFIT MEDICAL
MARIJUANA DISPENSARY AND MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT;
this shall include all storage areas, retail space and offices FOR THE
NONPROFIT MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY AND
MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT.

d. Shall not be located within 5,280 feet of the same type of use or a
medical marijuana cultivation or infusion facility. This distance shall
be measured from the exterior wall of the building or portion thereof
in which the business is conducted or proposed to be conducted to
the nearest exterior wall or portion thereof of another medical
marijuana dispensary, cultivation, or infusion facility.




Page 452
e. Shall not be located within 500 feet of the following residentially
zoned districts: S-1, S-2, RE-43, RE-35, RE-24, R1-18, R1-14, R1-
10, R1-8, R1-6, R-2, R-3, R-3A, R-4, R-4A, R-5, and PAD-1 through
PAD-15. This distance shall be measured from the exterior walls of
the building or portion thereof in which the dispensary business is
conducted or proposed to be conducted to the zoning boundary line
of the residentially zoned district.

f. Shall not be located within 1,320 feet of a preschool, kindergarten,
elementary, secondary or high school, public park, public community
center, dependent care facility, homeless shelter, or youth
community center. This distance shall be measured from the exterior
walls of the building or portion thereof in which the dispensary
business is conducted or proposed to be conducted to the property
line of the protected use.

g. Shall not be located within 1,320 feet of a place of worship. This
distance shall be measured from the exterior walls of the building or
portion thereof in which the dispensary business is conducted or
proposed to be conducted to the property line of the place of
worship.

h. Shall have operating hours not earlier than 8:00 a.m. and not later
than 10:00 p.m.

i. Drive-through services are prohibited.

j. There shall be no emission of dust, fumes, vapors or odors into the
environment from the premises.

K. THE RETAIL SALE OF MARIJUANA AND MARIJUANA PRODUCTS
TO CONSUMERS IN A MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT SHALL BE
PERMITTED AS ACCESSORY USE ONLY.
***

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact Tamra
Ingersoll at (602) 534-6648, TTY use 7-1-1.




Page 453



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing - Rescind Action and Withdraw Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning
Application Z-30-20-5 - Southeast of the Southeast Corner of 107th Avenue and
Camelback Road (Ordinance G-6811)

Request to hold a public hearing and request the City Council rescind Ordinance G-
6755 adopted on Oct. 21, 2020 pursuant to A.R.S. 12-1134(E). Ordinance G-6755
rezoned approximately 122.92 acres located southeast of the southeast corner of
107th Avenue and Camelback Road to the Golf Course (GC) District.

Summary
On Dec. 1, 2020, the property owner filed a written demand seeking $14 million for the
diminution of value allegedly attributed to the adoption of G-6755.

Location
Southeast of the southeast corner of 107th Avenue and Camelback Road
Council District: 5
Parcel Addresses: 4655 N. 103rd Ave.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 454



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Human Services Campus Request

On Feb. 4, 2021 Vice Mayor Thelda Williams, Councilman Sal DiCiccio and
Councilman Jim Waring submitted a request (Attachment A) to the City Manager to
place an item on the Feb. 17, 2021 Formal City Council agenda. The request is for the
Accountability and Transparency (OAT) to be spent on services provided at the Human
Services Campus. The request involves the consideration to allocate the $3 million
budgeted for OAT in the current fiscal year (2020-21) as well as an ongoing basis in
future budgets.

This request is in compliance with Rule 2(c) of the Rules of Council Proceedings.

Savings from the current year could be repurposed with no impact to this year's
operations because an ordinance establishing OAT has not been adopted.
Repurposing OAT funds in future years would make the Council-adopted OAT program
unfunded in future budget allocations.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Ed Zuercher.




Page 455
ATTACHMENT A




OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Councilman Jim Waring
District 2


February 4, 2021

Ed Zuercher, City Manager
Phoenix City Hall
200 W Washington St, 12th Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85003

Re: Human Services Campus

Pursuant to the Rules of Council Proceedings we request the following item be placed on the
February 17, 2021 Formal City Council Meeting Agenda:

An item to immediately redirect any and all budgeted funds dedicated to "OAT" to Phoenix's
Human Services Campus to help address the needs of one of Phoenix's most vulnerable
populations. Also, in future budgets, these funds should continue to be allocated to Phoenix's
Human Services Campus to address the ongoing costs of providing these essential services.

Signed,




Vice Mayor Thelda Williams




200 West Washington Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • 602-262-7445 • FAX: 602-495-0527 • TTY 602-495-5810
Recycled Paper
Page 456

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

69 item(s)