← Back to meetings

Meeting phoenix-pdf-2022-03-02 complete

2022-03-02 · Formal Meeting

Items: 64

Formal Meeting

View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Summary
This item transmits recommendations from the Mayor and Council for appointment or
reappointment to City Boards and Commissions.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Mayor's Office.




Page 9
ATTACHMENT A




To: City Council Date: March 2, 2022
From: Mayor Kate Gallego

Subject: BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS – APPOINTEES

The purpose of this memo is to provide recommendations for appointments to the
following Boards and Commissions:

Fast Track Cities Ad Hoc Committee

I recommend the following for appointment:

Jason Vail Cruz
Jason Vail Cruz is the Manager of HIV Continuum of Care at Valleywise Health.

Duvia Lozano
Duvia Lozano is the Director of the LUCES HIV/AIDS Program at Chicanos Por La
Causa.

Mayor’s Commission on Disability Issues

I recommend the following for appointment:

Benée Hilton-Spiegel
Ms. Hilton-Spiegel is the Board Chair at Cortney’s Place and a resident of District 6.
She fills a vacancy for a term to expire March 2, 2025.

Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee

Councilwoman Debra Stark recommends the following for appointment:

Regina Schmidt
Ms. Schmidt is a Landscape Designer at Waibel & Associates Landscape Architecture,
LLC and a resident of District 3. She replaces Katie Belous for a term to expire
November 19, 2023.




Page 10
Councilwoman Debra Stark recommends the following for reappointment:

Larisa Balderrama
Ms. Balderrama is serving her second term to expire November 19, 2023.

Toby Gerst
Ms. Gerst is serving her fifth term to expire November 19, 2022.

Rob Gubser
Mr. Gubser is serving his fourth term to expire November 19, 2023.

Jennifer Hall
Ms. Hall is serving her fifth term to expire November 19, 2022.

Alex Popovic
Mr. Popovic is serving his second term to expire November 19, 2023.




Page 11



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Chennai Chetinaad Palace

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 180061.

Summary

Applicant
Zubair Zulfiqur, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
2814 W. Bell Road, Ste. 1454 and 1455
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 1

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is March 13, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.


Page 12


Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“For your information: here in Arizona I, Zubair Zulfiqur have working and managing
experience convenience store including alcohol products for long time. I have
successfully conducted my duty sales and customer service without any violation. . I
myself consider I ' m a competent person. I bear moral ethic and human dignity,
knowingly I have never done and will not violate any law. recently I have attended
Arizona liquor training class for law and management and obtain certificate and
deposited to AZ department of liquor. I ' m a confident, reliable and capable person to
conduct a business with all respect.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“As you know it is very suitability and privileges for restaurant patron if they can be
serve their choice beverage including alcohol with their food. and certain food make
test better with alcoholic ' s beverage. the area of my restaurant is a very neat and nice
community. lot of decent societies lice around the restaurant. the neighborhood people
been choosing this restaurant as their dream place to have good food and choice able
beverages. this are people will be happy to have this restaurant continued in business
and serve them good food and beverages.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Chennai Chetinaad Palace
Liquor License Map - Chennai Chetinaad Palace

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 13
Liquor License Data: CHENNAI CHETINAAD PALACE
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 2 2

Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0

Liquor Store 9 3 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 4 1

Restaurant 12 11 6



Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 48.77 81.55 88.21

Violent Crimes 9.21 11.67 11.46

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 57 51

Total Violations 97 77




Page 14
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1036081 2434 69 % 11 % 7%

1042071 1972 85 % 6% 5%

1042072 1463 95 % 11 % 5%

6185001 2076 86 % 7% 5%

6185003 860 4% 17 % 17 %

6186003 1177 89 % 11 % 24 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 15
Liquor License Map: CHENNAI CHETINAAD PALACE
2814 W BELL RD




Ü
Date: 1/14/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 16



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Lump Busters

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Terri Gall

Location
2601 E. Rose Garden Lane
Council District: 2

Function
Dinner

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
April 9, 2022 - 6 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. / 150 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 17



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Coconut's Fish Cafe

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 169777.

Summary

Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
7000 E. Mayo Blvd., Ste. 1108
Zoning Classification: PUD PCD
Council District: 2

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business
has plans to open in April 2022.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is March 13, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the


Page 18

State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Coconut's Fish Cafe (Series 12)
16640 N. Scottsdale Road, Ste.103, Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales and service.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Moving to its new location, Coconut's Fish Cafe is a popular family friendly
neighborhood restaurant offering fresh fish and seafood dishes, burgers, pastas,
soups and salads in a unique island/beach theme setting. Applicant would like to offer
alcohol to its guests 21 an over as an incident to their favorite dishes served."

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Coconut's Fish Cafe
Liquor License Map - Coconut's Fish Cafe

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.



Page 19
Liquor License Data: COCONUT'S FISH CAFE
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 6 4

Liquor Store 9 1 1

Hotel 11 1 1

Restaurant 12 20 17



Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 48.77 14.59 24.52

Violent Crimes 9.21 1.22 1.48
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 57 0

Total Violations 97


Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

2168442 1681 50 % 43 % 4%

2168452 694 23 % 38 % 8%

6152001 1993 8% 29 % 12 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 20
Liquor License Map: COCONUT'S FISH CAFE
7000 E MAYO BLVD




Ü
Date: 1/14/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 21



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Hello Vietnam Pho & Roll

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 179619.

Summary

Applicant
Hello Vietnam Pho & Roll

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
12847 N. Tatum Blvd., Ste. E01
Zoning Classification: C-2 PCD
Council District: 3

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is March 8, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations


Page 22

on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Hello Vietnam Pho & Roll (Series 12)
25245 N. Lake Pleasant Pkwy., #1100, Peoria
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Hello Vietnam Pho & Roll (Series 12)
8752 E. Shea Blvd., #C-11, Scottsdale
Call for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have taken both employee + management training for liquor law training I have
managed Sushi Ko, Inc with a liquor license I am also 1/2 owner of Hello Vietnam Pho
& Roll at 8752 E. Shea Blvd. Scottsdale AZ 85260.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We provide a safe & clean place where customers can enjoy a drink with quality food.
Our liquor sales are low compared to the amount of food sold. Our hours are 10AM -
8PM so food & liquor sales are cut off relatively early.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Hello Vietnam Pho & Roll
Liquor License Map - Hello Vietnam Pho & Roll


Page 23


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 24
Liquor License Data: HELLO VIETNAM PHO & ROLL
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 2 1

Liquor Store 9 5 3

Beer and Wine Store 10 5 1

Hotel 11 1 0

Restaurant 12 20 16



Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 48.77 79.37 169.63

Violent Crimes 9.21 5.83 8.70

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 57 35

Total Violations 97 47




Page 25
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1032051 1834 100 % 6% 0%

1032052 1192 82 % 0% 16 %

1032082 1548 38 % 36 % 18 %

1032091 804 74 % 0% 24 %

1032101 872 20 % 20 % 12 %

1032102 1681 32 % 14 % 19 %

1032105 468 0% 19 % 22 %

1032106 886 23 % 22 % 7%

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 26
Liquor License Map: HELLO VIETNAM PHO & ROLL
12847 N TATUM BLVD




Ü
Date: 1/11/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 27



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Abyssinia Restaurant & Cafe

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 1207A919.

Summary

Applicant
Azeb Getahun, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
842 E. Indian School Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 4

This request is for an acquisition of control of an existing liquor license for a restaurant.
This location is currently licensed for liquor sales. This location requires a Use Permit
to allow outdoor dining.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is March 19, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration may be given only to the applicant's personal
qualifications.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,


Page 28

grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am over 21 years old and I have the ability to uphold the State and Federal laws.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 29



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Chicas Cabaret

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 07070720.

Summary

Applicant
Christian Nava Cruz, Agent

License Type
Series 7 - Beer and Wine Bar

Location
2802 N. 35th Ave.
Zoning Classification: A-1
Council District: 4

This request is for an ownership and location transfer of a liquor license for a topless
bar. This location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate
with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is March 19, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the


Page 30

State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

T &A Cabaret (Series 6)
3420 S. Central Ave., Phoenix
Calls for police service: 38
Liquor license violations: None

Showtime Cabaret (Series 6)
3614 W. McDowell Road, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 9
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
Six letters protesting the issuance of this license have been received and are on file in
the Office of the City Clerk. The letters are from local residents and property owners.
They feel that the issuance of the liquor license is not in the best interest of the
community due to late night service of alcohol, potential unsafe driving through the
neighborhood, and loud activity in the parking lot of the establishment.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have 22 year of experience in this business I started from the bottom cleaning toilets
to handing out flyer's Business to Business I also worked security/Bartender/DJ to
manager to Gm I also had a management marketing company taking companies from
closig to being some of the to businesses in the country.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“I took this business from being the worst club in the city this place had lot's of Liquor
violation act of violence also police Ice raids I changed it to a safe & fun bar for the
community I have a great relationship with the neighborhood association La Familia &
Im the president of maryvalle business alliance so public interest is top priority we also
provide job's for 150 to 200 people that provide for there families.”



Page 31

Staff Recommendation
Staff gave careful consideration to the protest letters received, however after reviewing
the application in its entirety staff is recommending approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Chicas Cabaret
Liquor License Map - Chicas Cabaret

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 32
Liquor License Data: CHICAS CABARET
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Wholesaler 4 6 2

Bar 6 5 1

Beer and Wine Bar 7 3 3

Liquor Store 9 3 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 11 4

Restaurant 12 11 3


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 48.77 127.33 110.72

Violent Crimes 9.21 29.61 24.52

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 57 85

Total Violations 97 140




Page 33
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1101002 1880 31 % 18 % 37 %

1101003 2592 65 % 0% 27 %

1101004 1252 80 % 7% 41 %

1121001 989 53 % 5% 35 %

1121002 1598 60 % 3% 32 %

1122011 2386 70 % 3% 37 %

1122012 2059 55 % 21 % 17 %

1122023 1804 32 % 11 % 32 %

1169001 2535 66 % 12 % 50 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 34
Liquor License Map: CHICAS CABARET
2802 N 35TH AVE




Ü
Date: 1/20/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 35



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Kwik Corner 305

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 176080.

Summary

Applicant
Subhash Thathi, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
305 E. Thomas Road
Zoning Classification: C-1
Council District: 4

This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that sells gas. This
location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an
interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is March 5, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the


Page 36

State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Sinclair 1101 (Series 10)
1101 N. 7th St., Phoenix
Calls for police service: 66
Liquor license violations: None

Kwik Corner #5059 (Series 10)
5059 W. Olive Ave., Glendale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Mobil Kwik Corner 1957 (Series 10)
1957 N. Country Club Drive, Mesa
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am fully trained and have 8 of these stores which I run day to day.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This business been here for more than 30 years and we have lot of regular customer
who comes in to buy all the convenience items including bear and wine.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Kwik Corner 305


Page 37

Liquor License Map - Kwik Corner 305

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 38
Liquor License Data: KWIK CORNER 305
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 9 3

Beer and Wine Bar 7 4 1

Liquor Store 9 5 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 8 6

Hotel 11 2 1

Restaurant 12 34 14

Club 14 1 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 48.77 131.23 94.26

Violent Crimes 9.21 21.81 17.09

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 57 50

Total Violations 97 88




Page 39
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1105013 824 16 % 17 % 40 %

1105022 1216 28 % 19 % 23 %

1106004 1456 47 % 27 % 3%

1117004 1227 75 % 20 % 21 %

1118001 742 44 % 28 % 5%

1118003 996 65 % 15 % 4%

1118004 671 62 % 6% 6%

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 40
Liquor License Map: KWIK CORNER 305
305 E THOMAS RD




Ü
Date: 1/10/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 41



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Virginia Market

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 179924.

Summary

Applicant
Hussam Yousef, Agent

License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store

Location
702 E. Virginia Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 4

This request is for a new liquor license for a liquor store. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is March 12, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations


Page 42

on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Virginia Market (Series 10)
702 E. Virginia Ave., Phoenix
Calls for police service: 10
Liquor license violations: None

Mesa Liquor (Series 9)
1930 E. Broadway Road, #2, Mesa
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I developed good experience from managing two stores one of them is liquor store
since March 2017. In addition to the work experience I armed with a master in
Financial management.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Enforcing Liquor regulations and licensing law keep the community safe and reduce
alcohole problems.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Virginia Market
Liquor License Map - Virginia Market

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.

Page 43
Liquor License Data: VIRGINIA MARKET
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 9 2

Beer and Wine Bar 7 5 0

Liquor Store 9 6 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 8 3

Hotel 11 1 0

Restaurant 12 33 9

Club 14 1 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 48.77 116.45 76.32

Violent Crimes 9.21 24.62 14.96

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 57 58

Total Violations 98 98




Page 44
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1105022 1216 28 % 19 % 23 %

1106004 1456 47 % 27 % 3%

1117001 1792 45 % 32 % 41 %

1117003 1057 64 % 2% 10 %

1117004 1227 75 % 20 % 21 %

1118001 742 44 % 28 % 5%

1118004 671 62 % 6% 6%

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 45
Liquor License Map: VIRGINIA MARKET
702 E VIRGINIA AVE




Ü
Date: 1/13/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 46



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - CASA Academy

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Tacey Cundy

Location
8047 N. 35th Ave.
Council District: 5

Function
Community Event

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
April 8, 2022 - 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. / 250 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 47



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Madison District Educational Foundation, Inc.

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Ari Levin

Location
5601 N. 16th St.
Council District: 6

Function
Broadway Show

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
March 31, 2022 - 6 p.m. to 9:15 p.m. / 900 attendees
April 1, 2022 - 6 p.m. to 9:15 p.m. / 900 attendees
April 2, 2022 - Noon to 9:15 p.m. / 1,800 attendees
April 3, 2022 - 6 p.m. to 9:15 p.m. / 900 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 48



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Villa Montessori School

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Athena Moskoyes

Location
2802 E. Meadowbrook Ave.
Council District: 6

Function
Dinner

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
April 23, 2022 - 5 p.m. to 10 p.m. / 250 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 49



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Native Grill & Wings

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 177435.

Summary

Applicant
Jared Repinski, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
5030 E. Ray Road, Ste. 5
Zoning Classification: C-2 PCD
Council District: 6

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is March 4, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations


Page 50

on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Native Grill & Wings (Series 12)
1339 E. Chandler Blvd., #101, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 6
Liquor license violations: None

Native Grill & Wings (Series 12)
8225 N. Courtney Page Way, Marana
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Native Grill & Wings (Series 12)
3100 E. Speedway Blvd., Tucson
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have been representing liquor licensed establishments in Arizona for over 15 years.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Tourism plays an important role in our local economy and liquor licensed
establishments (the sale of alcohol) is a very important aspect of tourism. Therefore, if
the City of Phoenix continues to lead the State of Arizona by approving quality and
diverse businesses (restaurants, bars, microbreweries, distilleries, hotels, resorts, golf
courses, special events, convenience / grocery stores & gas stations) similar to this
proposed liquor licensed business, all businesses will prosper.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.


Page 51


Attachments
Liquor License Data - Native Grill & Wings
Liquor License Map - Native Grill & Wings

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 52
Liquor License Data: NATIVE GRILL & WINGS
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 1 1

Bar 6 4 1

Beer and Wine Bar 7 8 4

Liquor Store 9 11 3

Beer and Wine Store 10 8 4

Hotel 11 2 1

Restaurant 12 40 21


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 48.77 56.50 131.74

Violent Crimes 9.21 5.78 11.35

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 57 2

Total Violations 97 4




Page 53
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1167171 1769 0% 25 % 11 %

1167172 1663 40 % 18 % 17 %

1167181 2685 40 % 10 % 9%

1167192 1023 3% 7% 22 %

1167193 1688 72 % 17 % 14 %

8100001 1870 83 % 10 % 0%

8104002 314 3% 25 % 12 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 54
Liquor License Map: NATIVE GRILL & WINGS
5030 E RAY RD




Ü
Date: 1/10/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 55



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Desiree Garcia

Location
380 N. 1st Ave.
Council District: 7

Function
Fashion Show

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
April 22, 2022 - 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. / 200 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 56



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - El Zaguan Bistro

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 179529.

Summary

Applicant
Jesus Rodriguez Figueroa, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
16 W. Adams St.
Zoning Classification: DTC - Business Core
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is March 7, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.


Page 57


Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“As a business owner I feel privileged to provide a great service and experience to our
guests, as a person with strong values making sure I set an example of responsibility
and accountability.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“By providing a great family and friendly atmosphere for our visitors to have an
excellent and safe experience for all.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - El Zaguan Bistro
Liquor License Map - El Zaguan Bistro

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 58
Liquor License Data: EL ZAGUAN BISTRO
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 4 1

Wholesaler 4 1 0

Government 5 8 5

Bar 6 44 29

Beer and Wine Bar 7 13 6

Liquor Store 9 2 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 13 2

Hotel 11 8 6

Restaurant 12 90 45

Club 14 3 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 48.77 150.34 197.13

Violent Crimes 9.21 47.50 56.26

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 56 39

Total Violations 96 87




Page 59
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1131001 1015 7% 8% 28 %

1131002 1242 3% 7% 33 %

1141001 2299 16 % 37 % 44 %

1142001 1321 36 % 22 % 50 %

1143011 1389 22 % 15 % 57 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 60
Liquor License Map: EL ZAGUAN BISTRO
16 W ADAMS ST




Ü
Date: 1/12/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 61



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Walter Studios

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 177527.

Summary

Applicant
Camila Alarcon, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
747 W. Roosevelt St.
Zoning Classification: DTC - Commercial - 1
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business
is currently being remodeled with plans to open in March 2022.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is March 5, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.




Page 62

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“The Applicant's member has significant experience as an entertainment and
production company and currently holds a Series 3 microbrewery, Series 7 bar and a
Series 6 bar license in Phoenix. The Applicant is committed to upholding the highest
standards with all Arizona liquor laws and regulations and will ensure proper training of
managers and staff on the same.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Applicant intends to open a restaurant, event space, and art gallery in downtown
Phoenix. It complements the other establishments currently operating in the Roosevelt
neighborhood of downtown Phoenix, and provides an additional dining option to the
surrounding community."

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Walter Studios
Liquor License Map - Walter Studios

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 63
Liquor License Data: WALTER STUDIOS
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 5 2

Government 5 5 1

Bar 6 41 4

Beer and Wine Bar 7 15 2

Liquor Store 9 4 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 8 3

Hotel 11 8 0

Restaurant 12 89 17

Club 14 1 1



Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 48.77 163.48 127.70

Violent Crimes 9.21 50.98 26.75

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 57 215

Total Violations 98 426




Page 64
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1119002 899 68 % 5% 9%

1129001 1670 70 % 4% 19 %

1129002 815 37 % 22 % 24 %

1129003 1372 4% 18 % 40 %

1129004 1325 47 % 24 % 52 %

1130001 1218 23 % 16 % 11 %

1131001 1015 7% 8% 28 %

1131002 1242 3% 7% 33 %

1141001 2299 16 % 37 % 44 %

1143011 1389 22 % 15 % 57 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 65
Liquor License Map: WALTER STUDIOS
747 W ROOSEVELT ST




Ü
Date: 1/6/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 66



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Kwik Corner 3001

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 175152.

Summary

Applicant
Subhash Thathi, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
3001 E. Washington St.
Zoning Classification: A-1
Council District: 8

This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that sells gas. This
location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an
interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is March 5, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the


Page 67

State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Sinclair 1101 (Series 10)
1101 N. 7th St., Phoenix
Calls for police service: 66
Liquor license violations: None

Kwik Corner #5059 (Series 10)
5059 W. Olive Ave., Glendale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Mobil Kwik Corner 1957 (Series 10)
1957 N. Country Club Drive, Mesa
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am fully trained and have 8 of these stores which I run day to day.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This business been here for more than 30 years and we have lot of regular customer
who comes in to buy all the convenience items including bear and wine.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Kwik Corner 3001


Page 68

Liquor License Map - Kwik Corner 3001

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 69
Liquor License Data: KWIK CORNER 3001
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 1 1

Bar 6 2 2

Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0

Conveyance 8 7 0

Liquor Store 9 2 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 10 4

Restaurant 12 9 1

Club 14 2 0



Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 48.77 89.80 86.09

Violent Crimes 9.21 33.20 30.78
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 57 97

Total Violations 97 156




Page 70
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1134001 589 0% 0% 100 %

1135021 2383 35 % 21 % 39 %

1136021 1061 49 % 11 % 53 %

1138011 1007 13 % 30 % 31 %

1138012 834 21 % 19 % 47 %

1138021 0 0% 0% 0%

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 71
Liquor License Map: KWIK CORNER 3001
3001 E WASHINGTON ST




Ü
Date: 1/10/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 72



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - The Garfield Phoenix

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 159738.

Summary

Applicant
Amy Nations, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
924 E. Roosevelt St.
Zoning Classification: C-1 ACOD
Council District: 8

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is March 5, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.


Page 73


Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“As a mom of three, and self-made entrepreneur, I've learned 1st hand the importance
of due diligence, research, and accountability. Having the ability to make decisions and
asess certain situations from a liability standpoint is crucial. Since completing my Title
4 liquor training, I have gained a great deal of knowledge and understanding of the AZ
liquor laws as well as new insight to the immense responsibility that comes along with
offering alcohol, and it's impact on people's lives. This is something I take very
seriously, and am comitted to the safety of my staff, customers, and the public whom
may be impacted. My focus is to ensure that our establishment is in compliance with
city and state laws at all times, and to continue to build relationships with the local
community as well as our neighborhood law enforcement. By doing this, I feel we can
facilitate a responsible, positive dining and drinking environment.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Since occupying our current location, we've received a lot of positive feedback from
the neighborhood. People are happy that we have taken this vacant historic diner and
have resurrected it into an attractive property that provides great food and drink. We
are community and food focused and strive to offer a safe and welcoming gathering
place that will foster responsible alcohol consumption. We plan to work with local
purveyors and create an establishment that contributes to the enhancement &
revitalization of the downtown Arts district."

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - The Garfield Phoenix
Liquor License Map - The Garfield Phoenix



Page 74

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 75
Liquor License Data: THE GARFIELD PHOENIX
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 2 2

Wholesaler 4 1 0

Government 5 8 0

Bar 6 26 2

Beer and Wine Bar 7 11 1

Liquor Store 9 3 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 14 5

Hotel 11 5 0

Restaurant 12 78 15



Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 48.77 169.18 112.73

Violent Crimes 9.21 38.88 26.85

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 57 210

Total Violations 98 382




Page 76
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1117003 1057 64 % 2% 10 %

1130002 873 29 % 21 % 38 %

1131002 1242 3% 7% 33 %

1132011 1312 29 % 26 % 48 %

1132012 962 50 % 23 % 44 %

1132021 731 33 % 20 % 74 %

1132022 1257 47 % 29 % 55 %

1132031 1473 30 % 20 % 57 %

1132032 638 28 % 7% 70 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 77
Liquor License Map: THE GARFIELD PHOENIX
924 E ROOSEVELT ST




Ü
Date: 1/6/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 78




PAYMENT ORDINANCE (Ordinance S-48364) (Items 19-27)
Ordinance S-48364 is a request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse funds, up to amounts indicated below, for the purpose of
paying vendors, contractors, claimants and others, and providing
additional payment authority under certain existing city contracts. This
section also requests continuing payment authority, up to amounts
indicated below, for the following contracts, contract extensions and/or
bids awarded. As indicated below, some items below require payment
pursuant to Phoenix City Code section 42-13.

19 Settlement of Claim(s) Udd, et al. v. City of Phoenix
To make payment of $273,000.00 in settlement of claim(s) in Udd, et al.
v. City of Phoenix, 2:18-CV-01868-JJT, 17-1190-001, GL, for the
Finance Department pursuant to Phoenix City Code Chapter 42. This is a
settlement of lost wages claim on June 27, 2018, involving the Police
Department.

20 ADK Consulting, Inc.
For $93,000.00 in payment authority for a new contract for a term of two
years to conduct an executive search for Assistant Aviation Director -
Chief Development Officer, and Assistant Aviation Director - Chief
Revenue Officer for the Human Resources Department. The executive
search firm will write recruitment marketing materials, advertise, conduct
applicant searches, identify a diverse applicant pool, coordinate
interviews, write interview questions, and facilitate offer and negotiations.
The Human Resources Department conducted a Request for
Qualifications.

21 West Publishing Corporation, doing business as
Thomson Reuters Elite
For $249,000.00 in payment authority for Contract 105718, through June



Page 79

30, 2026, for the support-maintenance and rules calendaring plan for the
Law Department's ProLaw software, which is the Civil Division's case
management and client billing system. This will continue the annual
maintenance plan which provides ongoing software updates and technical
support.

22 Ralph Steven Fisher doing business as Sentinel
Concepts, LLC
For $10,000.00 in payment authority to purchase a two-day low light
handgun instructor development course for the Police Department. The
Department's Firearms Training Detail topics will include range safety and
medical plans, how to deal with training performance-accuracy issues and
how to identify corrective actions, updated malfunction clearances, red
dot sighting systems with a white visible light, heavy emphasis on
accuracy and speed based on a positive target identification, and
effective low light handheld and pistol mounted light use. The Phoenix
Police Departments Firearms Training Detail is responsible for the
effective training of thousands of officers and recruits annually. The
instructors must continually educate themselves on current techniques
and teaching methods. Funding is available in the Police Department's
budget.

23 NicheVision Forensics, LLC
For $10,400.00 in payment authority for refresher training workshops for
the Police Department. The training includes a mix of e-learning content
and live presentations for approximately two six-hour sessions, with two
instructors for up to 25 attendees. Funding for the training is available in
the Police Department's Laboratory Services Bureau, 2019 DNA Capacity
Enhancement and Backlog Reduction Grant.

24 Integrated Medical Evaluations, Inc.
For $550,100.00 in payment authority for new Contract 155827, entered
on or about Feb. 2, 2022, for a term of five years, for independent
medical evaluations. Independent medical evaluations are used when the
Local Police and Fire Retirement Boards (Local Boards) require
information to determine the eligibility of individuals for a disability
retirement. Furthermore, State statute requires all public safety members
who have filed an application for disability retirement be referred for an


Page 80

independent medical evaluation by a board certified, Arizona licensed
physician to determine if they meet the criteria listed in Arizona Revised
Statutes, section 38-859. The Local Boards granted approval at the Jan.
4, 2022 meetings.

25 National Association of City Transportation Officials,
Inc.
For $25,000.00 in payment authority for a one-year 2022 membership in
the National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) for the
Street Transportation and Public Transit departments. The NACTO
Membership is vital to service, delivery, and the operation of the Street
Transportation Department. The Street Transportation Department will pay
$20,000.00, 80 percent of the total fee, and the Public Transit
Department will pay $5,000.00, 20 percent. The item will be heard by the
Transportation, Infrastructure, and Planning Subcommittee on February
16, 2022.

26 Arizona Public Service Company doing business as
APS
For $11,500.00 in payment authority to APS for the installation of 12 new
City-provided luminaries and mast arms on existing 12kV distribution
poles and one secondary transition from overhead to underground for the
Street Transportation Department. The services are needed to ensure
that project ST87210040 Area Bounded by 7th Avenue to 7th Street and
Lincoln Road to Watkins Street, meets roadway lighting standards. The
project was authorized based on recommendations by the Transportation
2050 - T2050 South Downtown Neighborhoods Mobility Study - Mobility
Area 1 to improve the safety of residents who walk and ride bicycles. The
work is necessary to ensure this area meets arterial lighting standards.
The work is budgeted and funded in FY 2021-22.

27 Doege Development LLC
For $213,440.00 in additional payment authority for Agreement 154721,
for Change Order 1, Project AV41000074 for the Phoenix-Goodyear
Drainage Improvements Project for the Aviation Department. Additional
spending authority is due to the discovery of unforeseen site conditions
during the excavation for pipe. The project is necessary to improve the
drainage system by constructing a covered storm-water pipeline to


Page 81

replace the current open-drainage ditch which runs through the airport
northwest and southeast of the runway and taxiways. Since the
Phoenix-Goodyear Airport facility was originally build before World War II
and was owned by several entities, the as-built documentation for
underground utilities was inaccurate.




Page 82



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acceptance of a Right-of-Way Assignment from Arizona State Land Department
for Access Road to Lift Station 42 (Ordinance S-48365)

Request the City Council to accept an assignment of right-of-way from the Arizona
State Land Department for an access road to Lift Station 42.

Additionally, request the City Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City
Code section 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the documents pertaining to this
transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability provisions that otherwise
would be prohibited by Phoenix City Code section 42-18.

Summary
Access to Lift Station 42 was severed by construction of the Loop 202 South Mountain
Freeway by the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT). Arizona State Land
Department (ASLD) granted a perpetual right-of-way to ADOT (R/W number 16-
121778-00) for the construction, operation, and maintenance of an access road south
of the freeway. The right-of-way was assigned by ASLD to the City at the request of
ADOT to restore access to Lift Station 42.

Location
Pecos Road Alignment, south of Loop 202 South Mountain Freeway.
Council District: 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
and Finance departments.




Page 83



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acceptance and Dedication of Easements for Sidewalk, Public Utility, or
Landscape and a Deed for Roadway Purposes (Ordinance S-48368)

Request for the City Council to accept and dedicate easements for sidewalk, public
utility, or landscape and a deed for roadway purposes; further ordering the ordinance
recorded.

Summary
Accepting the property interests below will meet the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.

Easement (a)
Applicant: PPO Carlsbad, LLC, Red Mountain Asset Fund II, LLC, PPO Apple
Valley MN, LLC, and H&H Family Trust, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: 3514 W. Peoria Ave.
File: FN 210129
Council District: 1

Easement (b)
Applicant: NS Van Buren, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 7420 W. Van Buren St.
File: FN 210122
Council District: 7

Deed (c)
Applicant: Performance Food Group, Inc., its successor and assigns
Purpose: Roadway
Location: 445 and 455 S. 75th Ave.
File: FN 210116
Council District: 7




Page 84

Easement (d)
Applicant: New Hope in Christ Church which acquired title as New Hope Community,
its successor and assigns
Purpose: Landscape
Location: 1616 E. Portland St.
File: FN 210114
Council District: 8

Easement (e)
Applicant: RJ7 2021 Dobbins, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 9225 S. 19th Ave.
File: FN 210121
Council District: 8

Easement (f)
Applicant: 3308 N 28th St LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 3308 N. 28th St.
File: FN 220002
Council District: 8

Easement (g)
Applicant: KLAD, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 3310 N. 28th St.
File: FN 220002
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development and Finance departments.




Page 85



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acceptance of an Easement for Drainage Purposes (Ordinance S-48376)

Request for the City Council to accept an easement for drainage purposes; further
ordering the ordinance recorded.

Summary
Accepting the property interest below meets the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.

Easement (a)
Applicant: Prolux Homes, LLC and Dahlia Rostenberg, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Drainage
Location: 2255 E. Desert Lane
File: FN 210123
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development and Finance departments.




Page 86



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Dedication of Right-of-way Along the South Side of Campbell Avenue, East of
99th Avenue (Ordinance S-48383)

Request for the City Council to dedicate right-of-way to public use for utility, sidewalk,
and roadway purposes along the south side of Campbell Avenue, east of and 99th
Avenue; further ordering the ordinance recorded.

Summary
The land to be dedicated was acquired for right-of way-purposes but was not formally
dedicated to public use. The 17,130 square foot parcel is located along the south side
of Campbell Avenue, east of 99th Avenue. Dedication is necessary to accommodate
public improvements including sidewalk and public utilities along the roadway. The
parcel is more fully described in the legal description to be recorded with the
ordinance.

Location
Along the south side of Campbell Avenue, east of 99th Avenue, identified by Maricopa
County Assessor parcel number 102-18-003G.
Council District: 5

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Street
Transportation and Finance departments.




Page 87



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Ratification of a Recorded Easement and Conveyance of an Access Easement
Across City-owned Property Located North and East of 28th and Elwood Streets
(Ordinance S-48384)

Request the City Council ratify a recorded easement, Maricopa County recording
20090644034 recorded on June 14, 2009, for purposes of ingress and egress, a multi-
use trail and utilities. Further request authorization for the City Manager, or his
designee, to convey an access easement within the recorded easement area for
access to an adjacent property.

Summary
The Easement to be ratified, MCR 20090644034 (Easement), was part of the Planning
and Development Department's code modification process (CMOD 090060) for private
utilities to cross property lines for the Southwest Solar project (Development) located
at 3545 S. 28th St. The Easement, signed by the then Building Official and Parks and
Recreation Director, included uses for ingress and egress, a multi-use trail and utilities.
Upon recording of the Easement, utilities and a private roadway were constructed for
access to the Development. The multi-use trail within the Easement, along Rio Salado,
connects to a multi-use trail along the north side of the Development that was
dedicated to the City as part of the Development.

Hecktech Inc., its successors and/or assigns (Hecktech), is currently developing the
property north and east of the 28th Street cul-de-sac, adjacent to the Easement, and
requires access across the Easement for a development (KIVA 19-371). The access
easement will exclude the multi-use trail and will be conveyed via separate recording
instrument, with standard maintenance and indemnification required from Hecktech.
The access easement will not modify the existing use within the area of the Easement.

Location
North and east of 28th and Elwood streets, within Maricopa County Assessor parcel
number 122-24-003N.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Parks and
Recreation and Finance departments.

Page 88



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
External Audit Services for the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report
(Ordinance S-48373)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to extend and allow additional
expenditures under Contract 145008 with BKD, LLP., to conduct the FY 2021-22
financial statement audits and federal grant audits for the City Auditor Department.
Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $579,250.

Summary
The City of Phoenix Charter and Code require that the City Auditor Department
arrange for an annual audit of the City's annual comprehensive financial report and the
federal single audit. These audits must be conducted by one or more certified public
accountants who are not City employees (external auditors). Due to changes in the
Governmental Accounting Standards (i.e., GASB 87), limited staff resources for the
dedicated on-going support of departments, and the need to focus staff resources on
new reporting requirements for the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security
(CARES) Act and American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding, the Finance and City
Auditor departments are recommending extending the contract with BKD, LLP for one
year.

Contract Term
Upon approval, the contract term will be extended through June 30, 2023.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $579,250 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $3,310,740. Funds are available in the City Auditor
Department's budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Contract 145008 (Ordinance S-43235) on Feb. 15, 2017;
· Payment Authority (Ordinance S-44629) on June 6, 2018;
· Payment Authority (Ordinance S-44902) on Aug. 29, 2018.



Page 89

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the City Auditor
Department.




Page 90



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Industrial and Medical Gases - Requirements Contract Cooperative Agreement
ADHS12-020682 (Ordinance S-48374)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to extend and continue using
Ordinance S-45994 under Contract 144279 with Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. to provide
industrial and medical gases to Citywide departments. Further request to authorize the
City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. No additional funds are
needed.

Summary
Matheson Tri-Gas provides a broad range of industrial gases such as oxygen,
acetylene, argon, hydrogen, and carbon dioxide tanks used for medical emergencies
and other industrial applications to numerous City departments. The primary
departments using the contract are Aviation, Fire, Police, and Water Services. This
extension is necessary to allow additional time to establish a new cooperative
purchasing agreement for these industrial and medical gases.

Contract Term
Upon approval, the contract term will be extended through June 30, 2022.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of this contract is $940,000 and no additional funds are needed
for the extension. Funding is available in the various City departments' budgets.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The contract was originally approved by City Council on May 30, 2012; supplemental
actions included Ordinance S-43005 approved on Nov. 30, 2016 and Ordinance S-
45994 approved on Sep. 4, 2019.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.




Page 91



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
TigerMountain Foundation Agreement for ARPA Phoenix Resilient Food System,
Backyard Garden Program and Council District Food Action Initiatives -
Amendment (Ordinance S-48388)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 155310 with TigerMountain Foundation, to provide additional funding of
$30,300 and time to the contract for two additional garden beds related to the
Backyard Garden Program and for construction of six raised bed gardens at the John
F. and Mary P. Long Homestead Park. Further request to authorize the City Controller
to disburse all funds related to this item. Funding is available through the City’s
allocation of the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding received from the federal
government and is under the Phoenix Resilient Food System category of the strategic
plan. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Summary
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Office of Environmental Programs (OEP)
developed a food assistance plan to address the food needs of vulnerable populations
and communities impacted by COVID-19. The plan provides: 1) access to healthy
foods for impacted populations; 2) infrastructure assistance regarding transportation
and delivery with a focus on home delivery; 3) support for food banks, food pantries
and community agencies; 4) support for increased local food production; and 5)
business and employment opportunities throughout the food system spectrum.

Local Food Consumption/Production
The Backyard Food Production Pilot Project aka Backyard Garden Program
This program will empower residents to grow healthy food in their own backyards to
improve health, promote physical activity, decrease food insecurity and hunger, and
potentially decrease their food budgets. TigerMountain Foundation (TMF) is providing
a total of 32 raised bed gardening systems to eligible residents in the Backyard
Garden Program, which includes system installation, including equipment, materials,
supplies and labor, and gardening training throughout the 12-month program. Program
outreach materials, application, and training materials will be provided in English and
Spanish. The original Subrecipient Agreement was for 30 gardens and two have been
added at the request of Council District 7 using a portion of their allocation from the
ARPA Resilient Food System program.


Page 92


Equity and Inclusion
Council District Food Action Plans or Initiatives
As part of the Council District Food Action Initiatives, TMF will install six raised bed
gardening systems to establish a community garden at John F. and Mary P. Long
Homestead Park located at 2602 W Glendale Ave. The community garden is being
established at the request of Council District 5 using a portion of their allocation from
the ARPA Resilient Food System program. OEP is coordinating the effort with Parks
and Recreation Department and Council District 5.

Procurement Information
Services may be procured, as needed, in accordance with Administrative Regulation
3.10 to implement and administer programs intended to prevent, prepare for, and
respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Contract Term
This amendment will extend the end date of the contract from Oct. 31, 2022, to April
30, 2023. Contracts may be extended based on continuous need and available
funding, which may be exercised by the City Manager or designee.

Financial Impact
The initial authorization for Subrecipient Agreement 155310 with TMF was authorized
for $138,000. This amendment will increase the authorization for the contract by
$30,300, for a new total not-to-exceed contract value of $168,300.

There is no impact to the General Fund. Funding is available through the City’s
allocation of ARPA funding received from the federal government and is under the
Phoenix Resilient Food System category of the ARPA Strategic Plan approved by

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Agreement 155310 (Ordinance S-47932) with TMF for
ARPA Phoenix Resilient Food System on Sept. 8, 2021.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Office of
Environmental Programs.




Page 93



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Small Business Workforce Training Program (Ordinance S-48377)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to utilize the remaining
$1.625 million of the $2 million American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funded Small
Business Workforce Program for the implementation of a new Small Business
Workforce Training Improvement Program and to execute contracts to codify program
requirements with the awarded entities. Further request the City Controller to disburse
all funds related to this item. This item will have an aggregate amount of$1.625 million.
There is no impact to the General Fund. Funding is available through the City's
allocation of the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) received from the federal
government and is under the City's Small Business Workforce Program category.

Summary
On June 8, 2021, City Council authorized $2 million in ARPA funding for a Small
Business Workforce Training Program to assist small businesses in Phoenix with
specialized training resources and/or assistance to enhance or expand their talent
pipeline. To date, two programs have been implemented.

PHXbizConnect
On May 5, 2020, City Council approved $100,000 of federal Coronavirus Relief Funds
to invest in a small business program to assist Phoenix businesses with their recovery
efforts. On Nov. 4, 2020, City Council authorized a contract with CO+HOOTS to launch
and maintain a technology-driven community platform. This platform, called the HUUB,
a robust digital platform that supports local governments in revitalizing small
businesses during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic, was launched on March 3, 2021,
and is providing on-demand expertise, guidelines and solutions to assist Phoenix small
businesses in recovering from the impacts of COVID-19. This platform, is made
available in both English and Spanish, and streamlines support for small businesses in
one central location, or hub, to assist with business stabilization, recovery, and
resiliency of Phoenix small businesses. On July 1, 2021, City Council approved a one-
year $295,000 contract extension with CO+HOOTS using ARPA funds as registered
businesses indicated PHXbizConnect had been vital in helping them navigate through
the pandemic, connect to grants, and grow their business




Page 94

during this critical time.

Local First Arizona Incubator Kitchen
On Jan. 5, 2022, City Council approved an $80,000 sponsorship for a new walk-in
cooler at the Rio Salado College Thomas campus located at 3631 W. Thomas Rd. for
the development of a new Local First Arizona incubator kitchen facility to amplify
efforts to grow food businesses in west Phoenix. The development of this new
incubator kitchen facility will be leveraged to implement business development and
technical assistance programs aimed at rebuilding the restaurant industry and
strengthening the food economy in an under-resourced area of Phoenix, benefiting
approximately 125 entrepreneurs annually with the physical resources needed to grow
their businesses.

Proposed Small Business Workforce Training Improvement Program
This proposed new program will assist Phoenix-based organizations with capital
investments or improvements to expand or enhance small business training programs
and/or demonstration projects that benefit the Phoenix
entrepreneurial/small business community. Organizations can apply for up to
$200,000 to expand and/or enhance their offerings with the following eligibility and
requirement criteria:


· Eligibility: The program and/or demonstration project must operate in Phoenix and
provide proof of the concept to include: a) History of the proposed program and/or
demonstration project; and b) One year proven success rate for the program or
equivalent experience in the project's industry.

· Requirements: Applicants must provide three quotes for the requested equipment
or physical improvements to expand/enhance their organization's small business
training offerings, and provide the number of people to be served and to benefit
from the program improvement funds.

An evaluation panel comprised of City staff and Phoenix Business and Workforce
Development Board members will review each application for eligibility and provide
recommendation for approval or denial. Approved applicants will enter into contracts
with the City to outline the terms and conditions of awarded funds.

Contract Term
Agreements with awarded organizations will be executed to effectuate terms and
conditions.


Page 95


Financial Impact
The aggregate amount of the Small Business Workforce Training Improvement
Program is $1.625 million. This amount reflects the remaining funds available from the
original $2 million that City Council authorized for the Small Business Workforce
Training Program, of which $375,000 was previously approved for funding. There is no
impact to the General Fund. Funding is available through the City's allocation of the
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) received from the federal government and is under
the City's Small Business Workforce Program category.

This is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Community and
Economic Development Department.




Page 96



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Mayo Reimbursement Payment Ordinance Correction (Ordinance S-48385)

Request for $4,620,953.50 in payment authority for reimbursement of permit and plan
review fees to Mayo Foundation for Educational Research previously authorized by
Development Agreement CON 72047. Further request the City Controller to disburse
all funds related to this item.

Summary
The Development Agreement (Contract 72047) was executed between City of Phoenix
and Mayo Foundation for Educational Research (“Mayo”) on Jan. 3, 1996, with a
contract term of 50 years. The Development Agreement describes the reimbursement
of construction sales tax for permit/plan review fees paid for Phase I improvements up
to the amount of construction sales tax paid. It includes a provision for unused
reimbursement credits that carry over if applicable.

The Development Agreement was executed after the associated Ordinance; however,
the Development Agreement is inconsistent with the Ordinance with regards to
reimbursement amount. Staff does not have records that explain the discrepancy.


· The City Council Report dated Sept. 14, 1995, (GEN81552) refers to the permit
fee reimbursements “estimated cost” of $1,045,000.
· The Payment Ordinance dated Sept. 20, 1995, (S-23079) Section 1.f. specifies
that the City shall reimburse Mayo in an amount “not to exceed” $1,045,000.
· The Development Agreement (CON 72047) dated Jan. 3, 1996, Section 6
provides for reimbursements limited to the amount of construction sales tax
remitted to the city, with no hard cap or maximum amount.


To date, the City has paid Mayo $5,665,953.50 as reimbursement of permit and plan
review fees collected by the Development Services/Planning & Development
Department for Phase I construction activity provided by the Development
Agreement Jan. 3, 1996, to Dec. 31, 2020. Additional payment authority of
$4,620,953.50 is requested to correct the discrepancy between the previously



Page 97

approved Ordinance amount ($1,045,000) and the total amount reimbursed to date.
Payments to Mayo are made from the Development Repayment Agreement Trust
Fund, which is reimbursed from City funds based on construction sales taxes remitted
to the City from applicable activity under the Development Agreement.

Future reimbursement requests will be reviewed per the terms of the Development
Agreement. Additional payment authority needed to process payment for future
reimbursements will be requested on an annual basis.

Financial Impact
All expenditures and fund transfers for reimbursements related to this item were
completed in prior years.

Previous Council Action
Authorized Development Agreement (CON 72047) and approved Payment Ordinance
(S-23079) on Sept. 20, 1995.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 98



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Development Agreement with Mayo Clinic Arizona for Installation of Public
Infrastructure Improvements (Ordinance S-48386)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to negotiate and enter into a
Development Agreement (DA) with Mayo Clinic Arizona (Mayo) for installation of public
infrastructure improvements, drainage and dedication of public right-of-way (ROW) or
easements, and any other agreements as necessary (Agreements) for a mixed-use
project to be located on approximately 228 acres south of Loop 101, east of 56th
Street, west of 64th Street, and as described in the Arizona State Land Department
(ASLD) Auction No. 53-122049 (Site). Also request authorization to amend the 1996
DA with the Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research (MFMER), City
Contract No. 72047, to utilize any "Unused Reimbursement Credit" for reimbursement
as described below. Also request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
under the terms of the Agreements.

Summary
Mayo is a nonprofit organization committed to patient care, clinical practice, education,
and research and providing expert, whole-person care to those who need healing.
Mayo selected Phoenix for an expansion following a national search that concluded in
1995. On January 3, 1996, the City and MFMER entered into a DA, City Contract No.
72047, for medical education and research in the connection with the development of
a mixed-use medical campus with a hospital and ancillary uses. As part of this initial
DA, that is still in effect, the City reimburses Mayo for permitting fees through
construction sales tax. The DA culminated with Mayo commencing construction in
1996 on their existing campus in North Phoenix. Mayo's Phase I Hospital has been
operational ever since with subsequent expansions including the addition of their
Proton Therapy facility in 2014 to deliver specialized cancer treatments to its patients.

Mayo is currently undergoing a $748 million dollar expansion on their existing north
Phoenix campus to enhance their top-ranked patient care, clinical research, and
medical school for a total footprint of more than three million square-feet. This
expansion will nearly double the footprint on the Phoenix campus.

In December 2021, Mayo was the successful bidder at a public ASLD auction to
acquire approximately 228-acres of land located immediately adjacent to their existing


Page 99

north Phoenix campus. Mayo envisions the development and creation of this Site as
the “Discovery Oasis”, similar to the “Discovery Square” adjacent to its campus in
Rochester, Minn. Discovery Square is a 16-block sub-district built in collaboration with
Mayo in a highly connected urban life science hub. In Phoenix, “Discovery Oasis” will
be home to early and later stage healthcare, life sciences, technology, and other
industry-related companies, adding approximately 2,000 new high wage jobs and
approximately 500,000 square-feet of new development representing an estimated
$250 million in capital investment.

Mayo has been a strategic partner of the City of Phoenix as it works to attract life
science and health technology leaders, and jobs, to the community. The creation of
Discovery Oasis will further accelerate these efforts as companies are attracted to
being co-located with Mayo as a top-ranked research and patient care organization.

To facilitate the development of the Discovery Oasis on the Site, enhanced new public
infrastructure improvements and drainage solutions at an estimated cost of $40 million
will need to be installed by Mayo, including:

· Construction of the north half of Mayo Boulevard along project frontage including
streets, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and landscaping;
· Construction of the east half street of 56th Street frontage including street, curb,
gutter, sidewalk, and landscaping;
· Reconstruction of the interim traffic signal located at the intersection of Mayo
Boulevard and 64th Street, unless developed sooner by others;
· Additional public street improvements and traffic signal infrastructure as required by
the approved traffic impact analysis;
· Construction or redevelopment of roadway striping or resurfacing to accommodate
restriping;
· Contribution of $4.7 million towards the construction of the 64th Street
improvements, including the bridge over the Reach;
· 16-inch water main extension within Mayo Boulevard, from 56th to 64th streets;
· Distribution water main extension along 64th Street north of Mayo Boulevard;
· Connection of the main within 64th Street connecting to the existing 12-inch main
within Mayo Boulevard;
· Construction of water main extensions within the new public ROW adjacent to, or
incorporated in, the project;
· Construction of new fire hydrants located in the public ROW;
· Construction of new sewer mains or upsizing of existing sewer mains located in the
public ROW;



Page 100

· Improvements related to public transit including bus stops, bus shelters and
enhanced street improvements to accommodate for public transit; and
· Construction of the ultimate 100-year storm event box culverts along both Mayo
Boulevard and 64th Street.

Subject to City Council approval, the following major business terms have been
negotiated with Mayo and would be implemented through the Agreements:

· Mayo will privately finance and construct the public infrastructure and drainage
solutions as outlined above;
· Mayo will dedicate and convey public rights of way or easements in a mechanism
approved by the City;
· Mayo must comply with Title 34 of the A.R.S. in constructing improvements;
· Public improvements must be preapproved by the City;
· City will reimburse Mayo for public infrastructure in the following manner:
1. Years 1-35, 100 percent of the General Fund share of Transaction Privilege Tax
(TPT) revenue generated from new development activity at the Site, including
construction sales tax and lease tax;
2. Any “Unused Reimbursement Credit” from the 1996 Mayo Hospital Campus DA;
and
3. To accommodate for the drainage improvements to be installed on the south side of
Mayo Boulevard, which is an existing public street, a reimbursement not to exceed
a total of $1 million shall be paid over a three-year period from the Strategic
Economic Development Fund.
· Reimbursement shall not exceed actual verifiable costs for approved public
infrastructure improvements.
· Reimbursement will not begin until after Mayo completes the public infrastructure
improvements, and the City has accepted those improvements;
· Infrastructure improvements may be completed in phases, as the Site develops;
· Reimbursements to be made annually, in arrears;
· No other sources of funds would be used if above resources are not adequate to
meet projected construction expense; and
· Agreements will include other terms and conditions as deemed necessary by the
City.

The development of Desert Oasis is an important economic development opportunity
that will create approximately 2,000 high wage jobs over time for the community and
will yield significant financial and public benefits for the City of Phoenix, above and
beyond the TPT and Construction Sales tax revenues generated.



Page 101


Contract Term
The DA will terminate 35 years after execution and the City’s acceptance of the public
infrastructure improvements and drainage solutions.

Financial Impact
The City will reimburse Mayo up to $40 million of the General Fund share of TPT
revenue generated from the Site. This includes 100 percent of the General Fund share
of TPT revenue generated from new development activity including Construction Sales
Tax and Commercial Lease Tax and any “Unused Reimbursement Credit” from the
1996 Mayo Hospital Campus DA. Additionally, up to $1 million shall be paid as a
reimbursement to Mayo for the construction, and acceptance by the City, of the
drainage improvements on the south side of Mayo Boulevard, which is an existing
public street. Reimbursements for the drainage shall follow the same reimbursement
requirements as the TPT reimbursement, but will be paid over a three-year time
period, estimated to start in FY2024-25, from the Strategic Economic Development
Fund. Financial terms of the Agreements will be reviewed by the Budget and Research
Department to verify funding availability prior to execution. No other sources of funds
would be used if above resources are not adequate to meet projected construction
expense.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item was recommended for approval by the Economic Development and Equity
Subcommittee at the Feb. 23, 2022, meeting by a vote of 4-0.
On Sept. 20, 1995, City Council approved entering into a DA with MFMER via
Ordinance S-23079.

Location
Generally located on approximately 228 acres south of Loop 101; east of 56th Street;
west of 64th Street, and as described in the ASLD Auction No. 53-122049.
Council District: 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Community
and Economic Development Department.




Page 102



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
National Registry of Emergency Medical Technician (NREMT) Testing
Representatives for Fire Department’s Emergency Medical Services Program
(Ordinance S-48366)

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into five-year
contracts with Robert Dotterer, and with Terrie Pasch for the provision of a National
Registry of Emergency Medical Technician (NREMT) Representative for proctoring
and testing services required for the Fire Department’s Emergency Medical Services
(EMS) Program. The aggregate value of both contracts will not exceed $33,600.
Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item.

Summary
The Phoenix Fire Department (PFD) Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Division is
an accredited educational organization that provides a NREMT-Paramedic training
program on an annual basis with an occasional additional course per fiscal year
dependent upon department need and computer-based and psychomotor
examinations.

National Registry Emergency Medical Technician psychomotor examinations are
standardized examinations administered in a variety of locations across the United
States. All advanced level psychomotor exams (Advanced EMT and Paramedic) are
authorized and monitored by an official National Registry Exam Representative.

The NREMT psychomotor examination for national certification is required by law in
the state of Arizona to obtain initial state Paramedic certification per Arizona Revised
Statutes (A.R.S.) Title 36 and Arizona Administrative Code (A.A.C.) Chapter 9, Rule
25. Pursuant to this requirement during the testing process, the NREMT representative
will provide proctoring services and deliver the testing material to the testing site, be
present through the testing process until completion, and manage the overall testing
process.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, normal competition was waived,
citing a determination memo - without competition.


Page 103


Contract Term
The term of the agreements is March 15, 2022 through March 14, 2027.

Financial Impact
The aggregate five-year contract value for the two contracts shall not exceed $33,600.
Funds are available in the Fire Department’s operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.




Page 104



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Request to Apply for and Accept 2021 Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency
Response (SAFER) Grant (Ordinance S-48387)

Request to retroactively authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to apply for, and
accept, if awarded, up to $10,984,800 from federal fiscal year (FFY) 2021 Staffing for
Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Grant Program funds. If awarded,
request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to add 32 new sworn positions.
Further request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and for the City
Controller to disburse, all funds related to this item. If not approved, the grant, if
awarded, would be turned down and no new positions would be added.

Summary
The grant application period opened on Jan. 3, 2022 and closed on Feb. 4, 2022. The
purpose of SAFER grants is to increase the number of firefighters to help communities
meet industry minimum standards and attain 24-hour staffing to provide adequate
protection from fire and fire-related hazards. The grant application will request
$10,984,800 to hire 32 new firefighter positions lost through attrition (retirements and
resignations). These positions will be used to increase service coverage area and
improve emergency response time. Funding will be distributed over a three-year period
with no cost match required. If awarded, federal funding will be up to $10,984,800,
over the period of performance.

Contract Term
The grant period of performance, if awarded, is three years and is estimated to begin
on or around March 2023 with a program end date on or around May 2026.

Financial Impact
If awarded, the City of Phoenix Fire Department will receive up to $10,984,800 in grant
funding for 32 new firefighter positions. No match will be required from the city.

Responsible Department
This item is recommended by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire
Department.




Page 105



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Request for Resolution to Adopt the 2021 Maricopa County Multi-Jurisdictional
Hazard Mitigation Plan (Resolution 22000)

Request to approve a resolution to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to
adopt and administer the 2021 Maricopa County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation
Plan as the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) approved Hazard
Mitigation Plan for the City of Phoenix.

By adopting this Resolution, the City of Phoenix recognizes the consequences and
need to reduce and mitigate the impacts of disasters.

Summary
In 2015, the Phoenix City Council approved the Maricopa County Multi-Jurisdictional
Hazard Mitigation Plan that expired in 2020. Due to delayed federal funding and
COVID-19, the multi-jurisdictional planning team began meeting in July 2020 through
November 2020. The City's Local Planning Team (LPT) also met monthly beginning in
August 2020 and finishing all assignments by December 2020. The pandemic
consumed most jurisdictions resources and subsequent "catch up meetings" were
conducted to assist several jurisdictions with finalizing assignments and the first draft
of the updated 2021 plan was issued September 2021. FEMA provided approval in
November 2021, pending jurisdiction adoption.

Key components of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000):
· Requires all local, county, and tribal governments to develop a hazard mitigation
plan for eligibility to receive certain federal non-emergency mitigation funds
(Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, Building Resilient Infrastructure and
Communities Program known as BRIC).
· Prioritization of hazard mitigation planning at the local level, with an increased
emphasis placed on planning and public involvement, assessing risks,
implementing loss reduction measures, and ensuring that critical
services/facilities survive a disaster.

Summary of updates to 2021 City of Phoenix Hazard Mitigation Plan based on LPT
collaboration, coordination and data analysis:
· Nine Natural Hazards selected for mitigation (See Attachment A).


Page 106

· Critical and non-critical facilities within the City, exposed to identified hazards,
estimated at least $7.8 billion. Replacement value for residential buildings
exposed to identified hazards estimated over $167.5 billion.
· Twenty mitigation actions, projects, and implementation strategies submitted,
fifteen are on-going efforts revised and carried over from the 2015 Plan (ID No. 1
-15), five are new actions and projects added to the Plan for 2021 which four
have already been implemented by the City (ID No. 16-19). The fifth new project
is being led by Downtown Phoenix Partnership (See Attachment B).
· Phoenix conducted two public involvement and input opportunities that provided
the community education and awareness of the 2015 Plan with a survey to
capture comments and access to the “draft” 2021 Plan with an opportunity to
provide comments.

Financial Impact
Funding for the identified projects, programs and efforts implemented to address
mitigation strategies is part of the specified departments budget. The potential financial
impact of the identified hazards in the event of an emergency or disaster far outweighs
the estimates of recommended mitigation strategies (Attachment C).

Public Outreach
In November 2020, Office of Emergency Management and Communications Office
staff developed and released the Hazard Mitigation Public website. The 2015 Multi-
Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan was provided for public comment. Several
resource links and a Fact Sheet was developed to help provide an overview of the
hazard mitigation plan process. A ten question survey in English and Spanish,
developed by Maricopa County Department of Emergency Management, was provided
on the website with a link to the Maricopa County Department of Emergency
Management website as well.

As part of the public involvement process, staff developed and published a social
media campaign for the month of December 2021 with social media postings two times
a week. All communications promoted the Hazard Mitigation website to encourage
community engagement and education. Additionally, staff conducted a virtual
community meeting to share details about the 2015 Multi-Jurisdictional Plan, the
purpose of the 2021 Hazard Mitigation planning process, and the importance of public
comment during the process and on the 2021 draft plan.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item was recommended for approval by the Public Safety and Justice
Subcommittee on Feb. 9, 2022, by a vote of 4-0.



Page 107


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department
Office of Emergency Management.




Page 108
Attachment A
Natural Hazard List for Phoenix Hazard Mitigation Plan


Natural Hazard List for the Plan and Phoenix

• Dam Inundation • Levee Failure
• Drought • Severe Wind
• Extreme Heat • Subsidence
• Fissure • Wildfire
• Flood




Page 109
Attachment B
Mitigation Actions and Projects and Implementation Strategies


Mitigation actions and projects and implementation strategy for Phoenix

Mitigation Action/Project Implementation Strategy


Community Primary Agency
Assets / Job Title
Mitigated Planning Anticipated
ID Hazard(s) Estimated Priority Mechanism(s) for Completion Responsible for Funding
No. Description Mitigated (Ex/New) Cost Ranking Implementation Date Implementation Source(s)


Review building permits for compliance Public Works /
Flood, Dam Staff Training, Plan Annual-
1 with Floodplain Ordinance and NFIP Both Staff Time High Floodplain General Funds
Inundation, Review Ongoing
regulations. Manager


Phoenix Parks
Page 110 Continue to include in the General Plan
Flood,
policies that protect the natural flow Parks and Preserves
regime of washes, designate areas for Land acquisition Recreation /
Dam Annual -
2 Open Space and Preserves, and when Both Staff time High and natural Initiative;
Inundation, ongoing
fiscally possible support the use of green resource protection PPPI
Extreme Heat,
stormwater infrastructure/low impact Administrator General Fund;
Drought
development to address multiple risks.
Bonds


Street
Transportation
Storm Drain CIP Program. Construct Staff Training, Plan
Flood, Levee Department/ Bonds/Impact
3 drainage facilities to mitigate flooding Both Variable High Review, Design and Ongoing
Failure Deputy Street Fees
hazard to residents of the city. Construction
Transportation
Director
Mitigation actions and projects and implementation strategy for Phoenix

Mitigation Action/Project Implementation Strategy


Community Primary Agency
Assets / Job Title
Mitigated Planning Anticipated
ID Hazard(s) Estimated Priority Mechanism(s) for Completion Responsible for Funding
No. Description Mitigated (Ex/New) Cost Ranking Implementation Date Implementation Source(s)


Planning and
Coordinate review and approval of Development
Flood,
development projects located within flood Annual - Department /
4 Both Staff time High GIS Enterprise
hazard areas with PDD and Floodplain ongoing
Extreme Heat
Management. Planning
Researcher


Summer Respite regional program to
Donations Human Corporate,
network with faith-based organizations to
totaling Annual - Services/Family Community, and
5 provide heat relief, hydration and respite Extreme Heat N/A - people High Heat Relief Network
$70,000 ongoing Advocacy faith-based
Page 111 with wellness checks. Program services are
annually Director contributions
provided for the affected populations.


Master Plan Update
Maintain and execute the Drought
and Water WSD Operating
6 Response Plan (Revision in Draft - No Drought Both Staff Time Medium Ongoing Water
Resource Plan Budget
Ordinance Change)
Update


Master Plan
Update, Water
Maintain and execute a water use WSD Operating
7 Drought Both Staff Time Medium Resource Plan Ongoing Water
awareness outreach program. Budget
Update, Drought
Response Plan
Mitigation actions and projects and implementation strategy for Phoenix

Mitigation Action/Project Implementation Strategy


Community Primary Agency
Assets / Job Title
Mitigated Planning Anticipated
ID Hazard(s) Estimated Priority Mechanism(s) for Completion Responsible for Funding
No. Description Mitigated (Ex/New) Cost Ranking Implementation Date Implementation Source(s)


Planning and
State statute;
Development
Revise and ratify the General Plan every Department/
8 Flood Both Staff time Medium Smart Growth Ongoing General Fund
ten years.
Planning
Requirement
Manager


Flood, Staff training;
Planning and
Development
Severe Wind, Staff time; Community
Annual - Department /
Page 112 9 Update and adopt a revised building code. Both Medium Permit fees
ongoing
Excessive Materials Outreach;
Assistant
Director
Heat Plan review


Zoning
Flood, Planning and
Continue to ensure zoning stipulations are
Ordinance; Development
met before construction permits are Annual -
10 Excessive Both Staff time Medium Department / Permit fees
issued, and zoning is compatible with the ongoing
Staff training;
zoning ordinance.
Heat Deputy Director
Plan review


Street
Transportation
Dam/Levee Safety Program – Operate and Flood, Dam
Staff Time, Staff Training, Plan Annual - Department /
11 Maintain Dams/Levees to mitigate flooding Inundation, Both Medium General Funds
Materials Review Ongoing Deputy Street
hazard to the residents of the city. Levee Failure
Transportation
Director
Mitigation actions and projects and implementation strategy for Phoenix

Mitigation Action/Project Implementation Strategy


Community Primary Agency
Assets / Job Title
Mitigated Planning Anticipated
ID Hazard(s) Estimated Priority Mechanism(s) for Completion Responsible for Funding
No. Description Mitigated (Ex/New) Cost Ranking Implementation Date Implementation Source(s)


Office of
Continue to provide links on the Dam
Homeland
Phoenix.gov/Office of Emergency Inundation,
Annual - Security and
12 Management website to sources of hazard Drought, Flood, Both Staff Time Medium N/A General Funds
ongoing Emergency
mitigation educational materials such as Severe Wind,
Management,
FEMA.gov and Ready.gov Wildfire


Continue to adhere to the City of Phoenix Street
Building Standards and Review Process, Transportation
Staff Training, Plan
which are regularly updated. The Building Subsidence, Annual - Department:
13 Both Staff Time Medium Review, Design and General Funds
Page 113 and Review Process requires site Fissure ongoing Design and
Construction
assessment for presence of, among other Construction
conditions, subsidence, and fissures. Management


Neighborhood
Services
Enforce City Ordinance 39-7D, which Staff Training,
Department: General Funds,
addresses overgrown vegetation, dead Zoning Ordinance
Annual – Deputy Director, Community
14 trees, brush and weeds or other conditions Wildfire Both Staff Time Medium with Neighborhood
Ongoing Preservation Development
that present a health, fire, or safety Preservation
Division Block Grant
hazard. Ordinance




Coordinate with private companies and Street
public agencies to study and map Transportation
Staff Training, Plan
subsidence and fissure activity in critical or Subsidence, Annual - Department:
15 Both Staff Time Low Review, Design and General Funds
key areas of the community so that Fissure ongoing Design and
Construction
effective mitigation or avoidance strategies Construction
can be implemented. Management
Mitigation actions and projects and implementation strategy for Phoenix

Mitigation Action/Project Implementation Strategy


Community Primary Agency
Assets / Job Title
Mitigated Planning Anticipated
ID Hazard(s) Estimated Priority Mechanism(s) for Completion Responsible for Funding
No. Description Mitigated (Ex/New) Cost Ranking Implementation Date Implementation Source(s)


Design and construct Rio Salado Oeste in Staff time, Parks and
TBD; anticipated
Salt River (19th Ave-83rd Ave), including design, Rio Reimagined, Recreation
USACE Civil
low flow channel improvements and Flooding and and land acquisition, Department/Nat
16 Both High 2030 Works project
riparian/xeri-riparian vegetation to extreme heat constructi design and ural Resource
funds and local
improve flow conveyance and increase on construction Division Deputy
city match
native vegetation/habitat. expenses Director


Parks and
The “Take a Hike do it Right” Outreach Reincorporate
Recreation TDB: Grants and
Program aims to educate the general original marketing
Department/Nat possible funding
17 public, including visitors and resort/hotel Extreme heat Both Staff time High strategies and On going
Page 114 ural Resource from tourism
staff, on hike/trail selection and hiking enhance effort to
Division Deputy related sources
safety to avoid heat related illnesses. wider audience
Director


Provide shade coverage at all City of
Phoenix Bus Stops to shelter riders from $20M
excessive sunlight and extreme heat. Of the (additional
Public Transit
18 4050 bus stops in Phoenix, 1500 of them $1M per Public Transit 2025
Department/Facil
still require shading structure. The T2050 Extreme Heat Both year for High Department's T2050
ities Deputy
plan will also implement a new bus shelter maintenan T2050 Plan
Director
design to improve shading options for ce and
mitigating heat/sun issues for west-facing repair)
bus stops.
Mitigation actions and projects and implementation strategy for Phoenix

Mitigation Action/Project Implementation Strategy


Community Primary Agency
Assets / Job Title
Mitigated Planning Anticipated
ID Hazard(s) Estimated Priority Mechanism(s) for Completion Responsible for Funding
No. Description Mitigated (Ex/New) Cost Ranking Implementation Date Implementation Source(s)


$270M for
Operating
Increase frequency of bus routes around Service;
Public Transit
vulnerable communities (highest ridership, $55M for Public Transit 2025
Department/Facil
19 low income, minority) to minimize Extreme Heat Both the High Department's T2050
ities Deputy
exposure to extreme heat while waiting for additional T2050 Plan
Director
public transit. buses and
replaceme
nt buses

Page 115 Downtown
Implement a notification system for TBD, plan Phoenix
Downtown Phoenix
Downtown Phoenix businesses to raise to put out Partnership/
20 All Hazards Both High Business Master 2022 TBD
hazard awareness and provide advanced RFP Q2 Strategy and
Plan
warning of potential threats in the area. 2021 Community
Affairs
Attachment C
Vulnerability Analysis Estimates by Hazard


Exposure Estimates a


Hazard Critical Facilities Residential Population b


Dam Failure (High Hazard) $0 $0 0

Drought (None estimated) 1,561,296


Extreme Heat (None estimated) 1,561,296


Fissure (High Hazard) $0 $32.8 million 214

$111.5 million (15
Flooding (High Hazard) $3.4 billion 34,577
Structures)


$37.5 million (6
Levee Failure (High Hazard) $1.7 billion 12,915
Structures)


Severe Wind (None estimated) 1,561,296


$552.2 million (113
Subsidence $27 billion 314,904
Structures)

$954.6 million (37
Wildfire (High Hazard) $7.1 billion 61,284
Structures)

a
– These numbers represent estimates of exposure that may result assuming all delineated hazard

areas are impacted at the same time. Actual event losses may not impact the entire area

during a single event.

b
– These numbers represent the total human population potentially exposed to the hazard.




Page 116



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Request Authorization to Apply for, Accept and Enter Into Agreements for Fiscal
Year 2022-23 Governor's Office of Highway Safety Grants (Ordinance S-48389)

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to allow staff to apply for,
accept and enter into grant contracts for Fiscal Year 2022-23 with the Arizona
Governor's Office of Highway Safety (GOHS), which includes funding from the DUI
Abatement Council and Proposition 207 funding. Further request authorization for the
City Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller to disburse, all funds related to this
item.

Summary
The GOHS announced the availability of funding on January 2022. Grant proposals
are due by March 4, 2022. If awarded, these funds will be used to support new traffic
safety programs and enhance existing programs in the City Prosecutor's Office, the
Fire Department, the Street Transportation Department and the Police Department.
The total Citywide request for funding is $5,657,178.

City Prosecutor's Office - Total Funding Request $225,000

Traffic Safety Resource Prosecutor: If awarded, grant funds will be used to pay the
salary, expenses, supplies and travel for an existing Traffic Safety Resource
Prosecutor (TSRP), Attorney IV. Approximately half of the funding will be sought from
the Oversight Council on Driving or Operating Under the Influence Abatement Council.
The other half will be requested through a grant from GOHS. GOHS will administer all
funds. The TSRP program has four primary objectives:

· Provide training for prosecutors and law enforcement officers in the prosecution of
traffic safety related crimes.
· Act as a resource for questions about traffic laws and trial advocacy.
· Improve communication between prosecutors, law enforcement officers, and
members of the judiciary.
· Act as a liaison for individuals and agencies committed to the enforcement and
prosecution of traffic safety related crimes.

GOHS has funded the TSRP program since its inception in 2007. Though the grant


Page 117

project is administered by Phoenix, it also benefits citizens, law enforcement, and
prosecutors across Arizona. The TSRP is a resource to both small and large
jurisdictions for legal issues related to the enforcement of DUI and traffic laws. The
TSRP also provides training to prosecutors, law enforcement officers, crime lab
personnel, interns and community groups. It is anticipated that up to $19,000 of
employee-related expenses will need to be covered by City general funds.

Fire Department - Total Funding Request $360,000

Occupant Protection and Child Car Seat Program: Funding will be requested for
training, overtime, related fringe benefits, materials, public education and equipment
related to child safety seats and seat belt usage. This funding will maintain current
occupant protection efforts and increase the frequency for conducting child safety
technician certification and recertification classes; increase the opportunities to
educate residents at car seat check events, increase the number of locations of
designated car seat check fitting stations to enhance geographical outreach; and to
enhance outreach for occupant protection public education in K-12 schools.

(DUI) Youth Alcohol Awareness: Funding will be requested for overtime and related
fringe benefits, materials, and equipment related to high school education campaigns
including dramatic mock crashes and classroom education. The program informs
young drivers of the danger of distracted driving, alcohol, and other drug impairment
with the goal of decreasing preventable injuries and fatalities associated with impaired
and distracted driving.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety: Funding will be requested for overtime, related fringe
benefits, materials, and equipment related to education campaigns to increase safety
awareness, traffic awareness, and skills necessary for young pedestrians and
bicyclists. This program provides bike rodeos for young cyclists, bike and pedestrian
school safety assemblies, and public education opportunities at community safety fairs
and events.

Distracted Driving: Funding will be requested for overtime and related fringe benefits,
materials, and equipment related to high school education campaigns including teen
and adult education as we build this program with the idea of eliminating or minimizing
injuries and deaths from a preventable choice to drive distracted. Education will
include educating drivers to recognize distractions; taking your hands of the wheel to
adjust electronic devices in the vehicle, texting or talking on cell phones; visual and
mentally focusing on the primary task of driving. The program informs young drivers of
the danger of distracted driving, with the goal of decreasing preventable injuries and
fatalities associated with distracted driving.


Page 118


Police Department - Total Funding Request $5,000,000

DUI Enforcement (Traffic Bureau): Funding will provide training, overtime, related
fringe benefits and equipment to support and enhance DUI enforcement within the City
of Phoenix and joint enforcement efforts throughout the valley.

Occupant Protection (Traffic Bureau): Funding will provide training, materials, supplies,
overtime and related fringe benefits associated with Click It or Ticket enforcement
activities, child passenger safety technician certification classes, car seat events,
Buckle Up, Baby Hotline and various seatbelt enforcement campaigns.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety (Traffic Bureau): Funding will provide training, materials,
supplies, overtime and related fringe benefits associated with education and
enforcement campaigns designed to increase safety awareness, traffic law knowledge,
and skills among pedestrians and bicyclists.

Traffic Services (Traffic Bureau): Funding will provide training, materials, supplies,
equipment (radar/laser speed detection devices), overtime and related fringe benefits
associated with education and enforcement campaigns such as: Traffic Impact
Programs, school zone enforcement, construction zone enforcement, Traffic Complaint
Hotline enforcement, and selective traffic enforcement programs.

DUI Abatement Council DUI (Traffic Bureau): Funding will be requested from the DUI
Abatement Council for overtime and related fringe benefits associated with DUI
enforcement and innovative Know Your Limit Programs.

Proposition 207 Funding (Traffic Bureau): Funding will be requested for training,
overtime, related fringe benefits, and equipment to support and enhance DUI
enforcement, pedestrian and bicycle safety, occupant protection, and traffic services
within the City of Phoenix.

Street Transportation Department - Total Funding Request $72,178

Roadway Safety/Education Programs: This funding will develop and enhance the
educational campaigns and tools for school, bicycle, and pedestrian/driver safety.
Requests for Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety includes funds for Pedestrian and driver
safety promotional materials, bicycle helmets, and LED flashing Stop paddles.

Contract Term
One year beginning Oct. 1, 2022 through Sept. 30, 2023. The contract term for


Page 119

Proposition 207 funds is Jan. 1, 2022 through Dec. 31, 2022.

Financial Impact
Total funding request is $5,657,178. The cost to the City is personnel expenses and in-
kind resources only.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and Deputy City Manager
Mario Paniagua, the City Prosecutor's Office and the Fire, Street Transportation and
Police departments.




Page 120



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Hickey Family Foundation Grant (Ordinance S-48390)

Request retroactive authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to allow the
Police Department to apply for, accept and enter into an agreement with the Hickey
Family Foundation. Further request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and
the City Controller to disburse, all funds related to this item. The grant amount is
$249,400. No matching funds are required.

Summary
The Police Department is requesting grant funding from the Hickey Family Foundation
in support of the Department's Human Exploitation and Trafficking (H.E.A.T) Unit's
mission to combat human trafficking, with emphasis on commercial sexual exploitation
of children and domestic minor sex trafficking. The unit intends to build on their existing
success through proactive and reactive investigations, undercover operations and
victim outreach. The funding will directly impact the unit's ability to efficiently and
effectively investigate the various forms of human trafficking and will enable a positive
impact to the human trafficking victims throughout the state.

If awarded, grant funding will be utilized for operational and investigative expenses,
training and equipment. If the request is denied, the grant application will be rescinded.

Contract Term
One year beginning Sept. 1, 2022 through Aug. 30, 2023.

Financial Impact
No matching funds are required.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.




Page 121



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Add Civilian Positions in Police Department for Staffing Relief (Ordinance S-
48391)

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to allow the Police
Department to add 33 civilian positions to the Investigations Division and North/South
Patrol Divisions to provide staffing relief.

Summary
The Police Department requests to add 25 positions to the Investigations Division and
eight positions to the North/South Patrol Divisions as part of the Department's
civilianization efforts (Attachment A). Due to current and future sworn staffing
challenges, it is critical for the Department to identify job functions that are currently
being performed by sworn personnel, that can be completed by civilians.

The Police Civilian Investigators will provide support to the Violent Crimes, Family
Investigations, Property Crimes, and Drug Enforcement Bureaus. This classification
will perform selected investigator functions to provide necessary staffing flexibility,
increase effectiveness with the Department’s investigative capacity, and allow the
Department to use sworn staff where they are most needed.

The Police Assistants for the precincts will perform several tasks of a quasi-police
nature in support of the law enforcement activities in the North/South Patrol Divisions.
The positions will respond to calls for service not requiring the presence of a sworn
officer, assist with civil traffic collisions, provide traffic control, and respond to
misdemeanor crimes with no follow-up. In FY2017-18 the Department received 16
precinct Police Assistant positions. These positions have allowed officers to respond to
higher priority calls and has been very successful in providing relief.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact as funding is already available in the Police Department's
budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.



Page 122
Attachment A
Police Department
Additional Civilian Positions



Position Job code Job Grade
Police Civilian Investigators (25) 62560 033
Police Assistant (8) 62160 325




Page 123



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Terminal 4 South 1 (T4S1) Concourse Retail Concessions Phase I at Phoenix Sky
Harbor International Airport Award Recommendation (Ordinance S-48378)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a Lease
agreement with The Marshall Retail Group, LLC to develop, operate, and manage the
T4S1 Phase 1 retail concessions at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport for 10
years with no options to extend. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer accept
all funds related to this item.

Summary
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport is among the busiest airports in the United
States, serving over 46 million passengers in 2019 and approximately 22 million
passengers in 2020 due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. With increased
passenger projections as the airport recovers from the pandemic, comes the need to
grow the airport's footprint and concessions program. The Aviation Department
received approval to construct a new eight-gate concourse at Terminal 4 in 2016. The
new T4S1 concourse is scheduled to be operational in the Summer of 2022 and will be
home to Southwest Airlines.

On March 17, 2021, Phoenix City Council authorized the Aviation Department to issue
a Revenue Contract Solicitation (RCS) for a retail concession operator within the new
concourse at Terminal 4. The goals of the RCS were to optimize sales and revenue
over the term of the lease, provide quality and unique retail merchandise to
passengers, emphasize local culture in the design of the facility, and select a
respondent with experience operating successful retail concessions in the U.S. and/or
abroad.

Procurement Information
Aviation issued the RCS on May 27, 2021, with responses due on Sept. 17, 2021. Five
responses were received and deemed responsive. The evaluation panel met for the
initial consensus meeting on Oct. 27, 2021 and respondent interviews were held on
Nov. 16, 2021. The panel's award recommendation was posted to the City's public
award website on Dec. 2, 2021.




Page 124

The panel consensus scoring and ranking for each respondent is shown below:
· The Marshall Retail Group, LLC 880 Points
· Stellar LAM PHX III LLC 825 Points
· Paradies Lagardere at PHX, LLC 810 Points
· HG CYS PHX Retailers JV dba Hudson 790 Points
· Gideon Toal Management Services, LLC 650 Points

Contract Term
The term will be for 10 years with no options to extend.

Financial Impact
The estimated annual revenue to the City will be the established Minimum Annual
Guarantee (MAG) or percentage of gross sales, whichever is greater. MAG for the first
year will be set at $1,010,000. The MAG will be adjusted annually thereafter at 85
percent of the prior year's annual rent owed by the Lessee or 100 percent of MAG for
the first Lease year, whichever is greater.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Transportation, Infrastructure and Planning Subcommittee recommended approval
of this item on Feb. 16, 2022, by a vote of 4-0.

Public Outreach
This solicitation process included all standard and required outreach efforts, including
advertising in Aviation industry publications.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 3400 E. Sky Harbor Blvd.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 125



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Terminal 4 South 1 (T4S1) Common-Use Airport Lounge Award Recommendation
(Ordinance S-48379)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a lease with AD
Partnership LLC dba Sapphire Lounge by The Club for the development, operation
and management of a Common-Use Airport Lounge Concession in the new Terminal 4
South 1 Concourse at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport for 10 years. Further
request to authorize the City Treasurer accept all funds related to this item.

Summary
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX) is among the busiest airports in the
United States, serving over 46 million passengers in 2019 and approximately 22
million passengers in 2020 due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. With
increased passenger projections as the airport recovers from the pandemic comes the
need to grow the airport's footprint and concessions program. The Aviation Department
received approval to construct a new eight-gate concourse at Terminal 4 in 2016. The
new Terminal 4 South 1 Concourse (T4S1) concourse is scheduled to be operational in
the Summer of 2022 and will be home to Southwest Airlines.

On March 17, 2021, Phoenix City Council authorized the issuance of a Revenue
Contract Solicitation (RCS) for a Common-Use Airport Lounge (Lounge) in the new
T4S1 concourse. The goals of the RCS were to optimize sales and revenue over the
term of the lease, develop the quality and uniqueness of the lounge facility, emphasize
local culture in the design of the facility and in food and beverage offerings, and select
a respondent with experience operating successful airport lounges in the U.S. and/or
abroad. In addition, the lounge must offer access to passengers of its partnering
airlines and other clients or customers wishing to pay for lounge access at PHX.

Procurement Information
Aviation issued the RCS May 27, 2021, with responses due Sept. 17, 2021. Four
responses were received. Three responses were deemed responsive. One response
was deemed non-responsive as they did not meet the minimum qualification for
experience operating a lounge in a large-hub airport. The evaluation panel met for the
initial consensus meeting on Oct. 20, 2021 and respondent interviews were held on
Oct. 28, 2021. The panel’s award recommendation was posted to the City’s public


Page 126

award website on Dec. 2, 2021.

The consensus score and ranking for each Respondent is shown below:
· AD Partnership LLC dba Sapphire Lounge by The Club
925 Points
· Joint Billion USA Holdings LLC dba Capital One | Plaza Premium Lounge LLC
818 Points
· MAG US Lounge Management LLC dba Escape Lounges
764 Points

The panel recommendation was reached by consensus in consideration of the above
criteria.

Contract Term
The term will be 10 years with no options to extend.

Financial Impact
The estimated annual revenue to the City will be the greater of a Minimum Annual
Guarantee (MAG) or 13 percent of gross sales, whichever is greater. MAG for the first
year will be $1.8 million. The MAG will be adjusted annually thereafter at 85 percent of
the prior year’s annual rent revenues or 103 percent of MAG for the prior year,
whichever is greater.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Transportation, Infrastructure and Planning Subcommittee recommended approval
of this item on Feb. 16, 2022, by a vote of 4-0.

Public Outreach
This solicitation process included all standard and required outreach efforts, including
advertising in Aviation industry publications.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 3400 E. Sky Harbor Blvd.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 127



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Terminal 4 South 1 (T4S1) Concourse Food and Beverage Concessions Phase I
Package 1 at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Award Recommendation
(Ordinance S-48380)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a lease
agreement with The Grove, Inc. to develop, operate, and manage the T4S1 Phase I
Package 1 food and beverage concessions at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport
for 10 years with no options to extend. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer
accept all funds related to this item.

Summary
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport is among the busiest airports in the United
States, serving over 46 million passengers in 2019 and approximately 22 million
passengers in 2020 due to the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. With increased
passenger projections as the airport recovers from the pandemic, comes the need to
grow the airport's footprint and concessions program. The Aviation Department
received approval to construct a new eight-gate concourse at Terminal 4 in 2016. The
new T4S1 concourse is scheduled to be operational in the Summer of 2022 and will be
home to Southwest Airlines.

On March 17, 2021, Phoenix City Council authorized the issuance of a Revenue
Contract Solicitation (RCS) for food and beverage concessions in the new T4S1
concourse. The goals of the RCS were to optimize sales and revenue over the term of
the lease, provide quality food and beverage offerings to passengers, emphasize local
culture in the design of the facility, and select respondents with experience operating
successful food and beverage concessions in the US and/or abroad.

Procurement Information
Aviation issued the RCS on May 27, 2021, with responses due on Sept. 17, 2021. Two
responses were received for Package 1 and all responses were deemed responsive.
The evaluation panel met for the initial consensus meeting on Nov. 2, 2021 and
respondent interviews were held on Nov. 9, 2021. The panel’s award recommendation
was posted to the City’s public award website on Dec. 2, 2021.

The panel consensus scoring and ranking for each respondent is shown below:


Page 128

· The Grove, Inc. 885 Points
· Kind Hospitality, Inc. 800 Points

Contract Term
The term will be for 10 years with no options to extend.

Financial Impact
The estimated annual revenue to the City will be the established Minimum Annual
Guarantee (MAG) or percentage of gross sales, whichever is greater. MAG for the first
year will be set at $850,000. The MAG will be adjusted annually thereafter at 85
percent of the prior year's annual rent owed by the Lessee or 100 percent of MAG for
the first Lease year, whichever is greater.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Transportation, Infrastructure and Planning Subcommittee recommended approval
of this item on Feb. 16, 2022, by a vote of 4-0.

Public Outreach
This solicitation process included all standard and required outreach efforts, including
advertising in Aviation industry publications.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 3400 E. Sky Harbor Blvd.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 129



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Terminal 4 South 1 (T4S1) Concourse Food and Beverage Concessions Phase I
Package 2 at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Award Recommendation
(Ordinance S-48381)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a Lease
agreement with Emerging Domestic Market Ventures, LLC to develop, operate, and
manage the T4S1 Phase I Package 2, small business opportunity, food and beverage
concessions at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport for 10 years with no options to
extend. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer accept all funds related to this
item.

Summary
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport is among the busiest airports in the United
States, serving over 46 million passengers in 2019 and approximately 22 million
passengers in 2020 due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. With increased
passenger projections as the airport recovers from the pandemic comes the need to
grow the airport's footprint and concessions program. The Aviation Department
received approval to construct a new eight-gate concourse at Terminal 4 in 2016. The
new T4S1 concourse is scheduled to be operational in the Summer of 2022 and will be
home to Southwest Airlines.

On March 17, 2021, Phoenix City Council authorized the issuance of a Revenue
Contract Solicitation (RCS) for food and beverage concessions, a small business
opportunity, in the new T4S1 concourse. The goals of the RCS were to optimize sales
and revenue over the term of the lease, provide quality food and beverage offerings to
passengers, emphasize local culture in the design of the facility, and select
respondents with experience operating successful food and beverage concessions in
the US and/or abroad.

Procurement Information
Aviation issued the RCS on May 27, 2021, with responses due on Sept. 17, 2021.
Three responses were received for Package 2 and all responses were deemed
responsive. The evaluation panel met for the initial consensus meeting on Nov. 2,
2021 and respondent interviews were held on Nov. 9, 2021. The panel’s award
recommendation was posted to the City’s public award website on Dec. 2, 2021.


Page 130


The panel consensus scoring and ranking for each respondent is shown below:
· Emerging Domestic Market Ventures, LLC 945 Points
· Mosby & Company, Inc. 875 Points
· TMG Services, LLC 845 Points

Contract Term
The term will be for 10 years with no options to extend.

Financial Impact
The estimated annual revenue to the City will be the established Minimum Annual
Guarantee (MAG) or percentage of gross sales, whichever is greater. MAG for the first
year will be set at $115,000. The MAG will be adjusted annually thereafter at 85
percent of the prior year's annual rent owed by the Lessee or 100 percent of MAG for
the first Lease year, whichever is greater.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Transportation, Infrastructure and Planning Subcommittee recommended approval
of this item on Feb. 16, 2022, by a vote of 4-0.

Public Outreach
This solicitation process included all standard and required outreach efforts, including
advertising in Aviation industry publications.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 3400 E. Sky Harbor Blvd.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 131



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Bus and Transit Furniture Advertising Revenue Contract Award (Ordinance S-
48369)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Lamar Transit, LLC to provide bus advertising and transit furniture advertising services
for the Public Transit Department. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to
accept all funds related to this item.

Summary
The bus advertising and transit furniture advertising programs generate revenue for
the Public Transit Department (PTD), which in turn is one of the components which
funds the City’s transit system. The advertising contractor is responsible for all costs
associated with the installation, maintenance, and restoration of advertising surfaces
pertaining to buses and transit furniture advertisements.

Procurement Information
PTD issued a Revenue Contract Solicitation (RCS) based upon percentage bids that
yield the overall greatest advertising revenues to the City on individual or combined
contracts for bus and transit-furniture advertising services. The selection was made
using a RCS procurement process in accordance with Phoenix City Code Chapter 43
and Administrative Regulation 3.10.

The evaluation panel, which consisted of qualified staff having experience with the
advertising programs, evaluated and scored each proposal based on the following
criteria (1,000 points total):
· Method of Approach (450 points);
· Price Proposal (350 points); and
· Qualifications and Experience (200 points).

The evaluation recommendations were reached by consensus in consideration of the
published selection criteria, with the panel selecting Lamar Transit, LLC for contract
award of both the bus advertising and transit-furniture advertising programs. The
following summarizes the results of the evaluations:




Page 132

Proposer Total Points
Lamar Transit, LLC 801
Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. 741
Intersection Media 670
Outfront Media Group 663

Contract Term
The initial five-year base contract term will begin July 1, 2022, and the contract
includes two one-year options to extend if the contractor has performed satisfactorily
and it is in the City’s best interest to exercise the available options.

Financial Impact
This is a revenue generating contract, with all related expenses being borne by the
advertising contractor. The RCS and resulting contract provide that the City will be paid
the percentage of net sales revenue submitted in the proposal or the Minimum Annual
Guarantee (MAG), whichever is greater.

The net sales revenue share percentage for Lamar Transit, LLC is 69.25 percent for
the combined advertising program. The MAG is defined as $1.9 million annually for
transit furniture advertising and $1.4 million annually for bus advertising. The MAG will
not decrease below the level of annual revenue outlined in PTD's current advertising
contracts.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Transportation, Infrastructure and Planning Subcommittee recommended approval
of this item on Feb. 16, 2022, by a vote of 4-0.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Public Transit
Department.




Page 133



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Paratransit Services (Phoenix Dial-a-Ride) Contract Award (Ordinance S-48370)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
MV Transportation, Inc. for the management and operation of paratransit (Phoenix Dial
-a-Ride) service. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total cost of the contract will not exceed $153,454,595.

Summary
The City provides Phoenix Dial-a-Ride service for individuals who, because of a
disability, cannot access or navigate local bus or light-rail services. This shared-ride,
origin-to-destination service is mandated by the Federal Government as required with
the enactment of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990. Commonly known
as "paratransit service," Phoenix Dial-a-Ride acts as a safety net for individuals with
disabilities and affords them the same level of transit service as other passengers,
operating during the same hours and covering the same areas as bus and light-rail
services. While the ADA requires the provision of paratransit service only within a three
-quarter mile radius around local bus routes and light rail stations, Phoenix Dial-a-Ride
operates within the entirety of the City's incorporated city limits south of Jomax Road.

Phoenix Dial-a-Ride is operated as a turnkey service, with the service provider
responsible for all aspects of the operation, which include scheduling reservations,
dispatching trips, operating and maintaining vehicles, and providing administrative and
support activities, with PTD supplying the fleet. This service is operated out of a
centrally-located facility leased by the contractor and staffed with about 200 employees
to operate, maintain, and administer this contract on behalf of the City. The current
contract expires June 30, 2022.

Procurement Information
Meeting. PTD issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) in October 2021 to solicit a
contract for the operation of Phoenix Dial-a-Ride service. Because PTD receives
funding from Federal Transit Administration grants to operate transit services, all
procurements and contracts must comply with federal requirements and process
guidelines. The process used to develop the work scope for the RFP and select the
contractor for recommended award complies with federal guidelines.


Page 134


An evaluation committee, with the aid of a technical advisory team, evaluated the
proposals to select the proposer recommended for contract award. Both the committee
and the technical team consisted of qualified staff from the City's Public Transit and
Human Services departments and Valley Metro, which coordinates regional transit
services with the City.

The following evaluation criteria were used by the panel (1,000 points possible):
· Qualifications, experience, and past performance (250 points);
· Method of approach and transition plan (200 points);
· Proposed organizational structure and personnel (150 points); and
· Cost (400 points).

The result of the evaluation committee’s deliberations is a recommendation to award
the contract to MV Transportation, Inc., which received the highest overall technical
score based on the evaluation criteria above. The final scoring and cost proposal for
the aggregate term of the contract are shown below:

Proposer Total Points Contract Amount
MV Transportation, Inc. 912 points $153,454,595
First Transit 825 points $170,587,800

Additional Information
In addition to the 200 local jobs currently supported by this contract, MV
Transportation, Inc. will partner with a third-party contractor to provide additional
service capacity as necessary to meet service requirements. The contractor’s service
plan also includes employing technology to integrate with the current scheduling
system to provide real-time service updates to monitor and track service performance,
and customer-focused apps to allow riders to manage their trips and receive service
notifications.

Contract Term
The initial five-year base contract term will begin July 1, 2022, and the contract
includes one two-year option to extend if the contractor has performed satisfactorily
and it is in the City's best interest to exercise the available option.

Financial Impact
The total cost of the contract with MV Transportation, Inc. is estimated at $153,454,595
for the aggregate term, which includes the initial five-year base term and two-year
extension option.


Page 135


Transportation 2050 funds are available for the estimated first contract year amount of
$20,244,948 in the Public Transit Department's proposed Fiscal Year 2022-23
operating budget, recognizing that the City is reimbursed annually by Valley Metro with
regional Public Transportation Funds to fund Phoenix Dial-a-Ride service entirely.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Transportation, Infrastructure and Planning Subcommittee recommended approval
of this item on Feb. 16, 2022, by a vote of 4-0.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Public Transit
Department.




Page 136



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Downtown Shared Electric Scooter Pilot Program Extension and Electric Bicycle
Legalization (Ordinance G-6967)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to approve a 12-month
extension of the existing Downtown Shared Electric Scooter Pilot Program, to amend
Ordinance G-6602 to extend the sunset provision by an additional 12 months to allow
shared electric scooters to continue to operate within the Downtown Shared Electric
Scooter Pilot Program area, and to amend Phoenix City Code to allow for the use of
electric bicycles on public streets Citywide.

Summary
Downtown Shared Electric Scooter Pilot Program
On June 26, 2019, City Council unanimously approved the Downtown Shared Electric
Scooter Pilot Program (Pilot Program), which allowed shared electric scooter vendors
to obtain a permit to operate within the City of Phoenix. As part of the Pilot Program,
shared electric scooters to operate on public streets. The Ordinance amendment also
included definitions for an electric scooter and authorized the City of Phoenix Police
Department or peace officer to issue civil traffic citations for, among other things,
speed limit violations, yielding the right-of-way, parking violations, and riding on the
sidewalk. Additionally, the Ordinance amendment included a one-year sunset
provision, which effectively would repeal the Code changes on June 25, 2020.

The initial six-month Pilot Program was to end on March 16, 2020. On Feb. 19, 2020,
additional six months and to open the permit application process to allow new vendors
to apply for the Pilot Program. Ordinance G-6676 also amended Ordinance G-6602 to
extend the sunset provision until Dec. 31, 2020.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the start of the second six-month pilot program was
delayed. In October 2020, staff issued permits for the second six-month Pilot Program
to two electric scooter vendors: Razor and Spin. The second six-month Pilot Program
commenced on Oct. 1, 2020. On Dec. 2, 2020, City Council approved Ordinance G-
6772, extending the second six-month Pilot Program through March 31, 2021, and
amending Ordinance G-6602 to extend the Phoenix City Code sunset provision to Dec.
31, 2021.

Page 137




On March 17, 2021, City Council approved a 12-month extension of the Pilot Program
through March 31, 2022, and an amendment to Ordinance G-6602 to extend the
Phoenix City Code sunset provision to June 30, 2022. The extension was approved to
allow staff time to research and develop a new program to replace the Pilot Program.

The requested action to extend the Pilot Program through March 31, 2023, and the
Phoenix City Code sunset provision to June 30, 2023, will allow shared electric
scooters to continue to operate within the Pilot Program area and Street Transportation
Department staff time to continue to develop a Request for Proposals process for a
new Comprehensive Micromobility Program. The program extension will also allow
the City to progress further with the development and implementation of a Road Safety
Action Plan (RSAP), and to incorporate micromobility transportation options into the
RSAP.

Electric Bicycles
Electric bicycles, or e-bikes as they are commonly known, have increased immensely
in popularity over the past few years. The COVID-19 pandemic spurred a significant
uptake in biking. E-bikes, in particular, saw a 145 percent increase in sales between
2019 and 2020. Bikes and e-bikes can be a means of reducing traffic congestion and
lowering our carbon footprint. Along with health benefits, e-bikes have the added
benefit of making cycling easier with the assistance of an electric motor. In fact, it is
expected that between 2020 and 2023 more than 130 million e-bikes will be sold
worldwide.

E-bikes are classified into three types in many states. Class 1 e-bikes are defined as e
-bikes that provide pedal assist up to 20 miles per hour. Class 2 e-bikes, on the other
hand, accelerate with the use of a throttle up to 20 miles per hour. Lastly, Class 3 e-
bikes provide pedal assist up to 28 miles per hour. As of 2019, e-bike manufacturers
and distributors are required to add a sticker stating the classification number, top
assisted speed, and motor wattage of the bicycle.

In 2018, Arizona updated state statutes to define e-bikes and permit their use.
However, they are still considered illegal within Phoenix city limits due to the
“motorized play vehicles” ordinance. This ordinance prohibits the use of certain
vehicles in the public right-of-way unless they are defined by state statutes as a motor
vehicle, motorcycle, motor-driven cycle, electric stand-up scooter, motorized
wheelchair, or electric personal assistive mobility device. Unfortunately, e-bikes are
omitted which renders them illegal. Therefore, City Code must be updated to allow
Phoenix residents to use this viable form of transportation. In fact, according to staff’s


Page 138

observations, e-bikes are already being used by residents on city roadways.
Additionally, the City's adopted Climate Action Plan identifies the promotion of active
transportation as a key goal toward reducing single occupancy vehicle use and
lowering emissions. In addition, staff anticipates e-bikes being part of the future
Comprehensive Micromobility Program.

The requested action to amend Phoenix City Code to allow for the use of e-bikes on
public streets Citywide will permit the use of Class 1 and Class 2 e-bikes in the public
right-of-way.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City of Phoenix to amend Ordinance G-6602 to
extend the sunset provision or to amend Phoenix City Code to allow for the use of e-
bikes on public streets.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Aviation and Transportation Subcommittee:
· Recommended approval of the initial Pilot Program on Jan. 22, 2019, by a vote of 3
-0; and
· Reviewed the program on June 25, 2019.

The Transportation, Infrastructure, and Innovation Subcommittee:
· Was provided with a three-month update on the Pilot Program on Jan. 7, 2020;
· Recommended approval of the Pilot Program extension on Feb. 5, 2020, by a vote
of 4-0;
· Was provided with an update on the Pilot Program extension on Feb. 3, 2021, and
requested the item be brought back to the March 3, 2021, meeting; and
· Was provided with an update on the second six-month extension and
recommended approval of a twelve-month extension on March 3, 2021, by a vote of
4-0.

The Planning and Economic Development Subcommittee:
· Was provided information on the initial Pilot Program on Feb. 5, 2019; and
· Received an update for information and discussion on June 4, 2019.

The Workforce and Economic Development Subcommittee:
· Was provided a report with a summary of the second six-month extension on Feb.
24, 2021, and requested the item be presented on March 24, 2021.




Page 139

The Transportation, Infrastructure and Planning Subcommittee:
· Was provided with an update on the Pilot Program and information on the proposed
Comprehensive Micromobility Program on Oct. 20, 2021.

The City Council approved:
· The Pilot Program (Ordinance G-6602) on June 26, 2019;
· A Pilot Program extension (Ordinance G-6676) on Feb. 19, 2020;
· A sunset provision extension (Ordinance G-6772) on Dec. 2, 2020;
· A Pilot Program extension and a sunset provision extension (Ordinance G-6823) on
March 17, 2021; and
· Fee increases to ensure full cost recovery (Ordinance G-6835) on April 21, 2021.

Location
The main boundaries of the Pilot Program are from 7th Avenue to 7th Street and from
Buckeye to McDowell roads. The Pilot Program boundary includes an extension of the
area bounded by Roosevelt Street and Grand Avenue, and a reduction of the northern
boundary to Portland Street between 7th and Central avenues.
Council Districts: 4, 7 and 8

The amendment of Phoenix City Code to allow for e-bikes would apply Citywide.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.




Page 140



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Baseline Road Fiber Optic Cable and Equipment Loop 202 to I-10 - Design-Bid-
Build Services - ST89360036 (Ordinance S-48367)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to accept William Charles
Construction Company as the lowest-priced, responsive and responsible bidder and to
enter into an agreement with William Charles Construction Company for Design-Bid-
Build Services for the Baseline Road Fiber Optic Cable and Equipment Loop 202 to I-
10 project. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related
to this item. The fee for services will not exceed $3,529,437.07.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to construct a fiber transportation enhancement along
Baseline Road from Loop 202 to Interstate 10. The project will be constructed within
the existing right-of-way of the City of Phoenix, City of Tempe and the Arizona
Department of Transportation.

William Charles Construction Company's services include, but are not limited to:
installing new conduit, fiber, and pull box infrastructure; installing fiber through existing
conduit, directional drilling and installing new conduit underneath asphalt, concrete and
canals; reconditioning existing conduit and pull boxes and installing new pull boxes;
installing electrical system fiber optic equipment; and other improvements as required
for a complete project in compliance with approved plans.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using an Invitation for Bids procurement process set forth in
section 34-201 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. Four bids were received on Dec. 21,
2021, and were sent to the Equal Opportunity Department for review to determine
subcontractor eligibility and contractor responsiveness in demonstrating
responsiveness to Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program requirements.

The Opinion of Probable Cost and the two lowest responsive, responsible bidders are
listed below:

Opinion of Probable Cost: $4,249,752.19
William Charles Construction Company: $3,529,437.07


Page 141

MP Nexlevel LLC: $8,434,184.49

Bidders who were deemed non-responsive are listed below, in alphabetical order:
BPG Designs, L.L.C.
Martell Electric, LLC

The bid award amount is within the total budget for this project.

The reason for the variance from the Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC) to the lowest,
responsive, responsible bid is the OPC is based on contractor's pricing on similar
projects for the City of Phoenix in 2020. A factor of safety was added to the average of
bid unit prices known in 2020 given the amount of available work in the Phoenix Metro
area exceeded labor forces available and the difficulty of conditions anticipated along
Baseline Road.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is 300 calendar days from issuance of the Notice to
Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of
the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of
the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for William Charles Construction Company will not exceed
$3,529,437.07, including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.

This project will utilize federal funds and is subject to the requirements of 49 Code of
Federal Regulations Part 26 and the U.S. Department of Transportation DBE Program.
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and
approve funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.

Public Outreach
William Charles Construction Company will work with the City of Phoenix Street
Transportation Department on public outreach, if needed.

Location
Baseline Road/Loop 202 to I-10
Council Districts: 6, 7, 8 and Out of City



Page 142

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Street
Transportation Department, and the City Engineer.




Page 143



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Street Transportation Department Environmental, Natural-Cultural Resources,
National Environmental Policy Act On-Call Consulting Services for Calendar
Years 2021-2022 - Amendment (Ordinance S-48382)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 153067 with Archaeological Consulting Services, Ltd., to approve a name
change to Commonwealth Heritage Group, Inc.

Summary
Commonwealth Heritage Group, Inc. will be responsible for providing On-Call
Environmental / Natural-Cultural Resources / National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) consulting services that include, but are not limited to: NEPA documentation
and related supporting technical analysis and reports; cultural resources; biology and
natural resources; Rivers and Harbors Act Section 408 permitting; Clean Water Act
sections 404, 401 and 402; Clean Air Act; green infrastructure; and developing and
updating environmental compliance training programs.

This amendment is necessary because Archaeological Consulting Services, Ltd.
merged with Commonwealth Heritage Group, Inc. on Aug. 11, 2021. All responsible
project personnel from Archaeological Consulting Services, Ltd. shall remain actively
involved and oversee the projects under this Agreement.

Contract Term
The term of original agreement remains unchanged. Work scope identified and
incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term may be agreed to by the
parties, and work may extend past the termination of the agreement. No additional
changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The initial agreement amount remains unchanged.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved On-Call Consulting Services Agreement 153067
(Ordinance S-46960) on Oct. 7, 2020.



Page 144

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Street
Transportation Department, and the City Engineer.




Page 145



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Padlocks for Water Customer Services (Ordinance S-48372)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Anderson Lock and Safe to provide padlocks for the Water Services Department.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The agreement value will not exceed $555,403.

Summary
The purpose of this agreement is to purchase padlocks for the Water Services
Department, on an as needed basis. The padlocks are used to secure items within the
department including fire hydrants, meter vaults, safety-related lock-out tag-out
procedures and other anti-theft and security purposes.

Anderson Lock and Safe will supply padlocks of varying sizes as needed by the Water
Meters Division.

Procurement Information
The recommendation was made using an Invitation for Bids procurement process in
accordance with City of Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Seven vendors submitted bids and are listed below. All bids were found to be
responsive and responsible.

Selected Bidder
Anderson Lock and Safe: $115,466

Other Bidders
Accredited Lock Supply: $123,570
Doyle Security: $124,430
Independent Hardware: $123,928
Intermountain Lock: $122,840
Locking Solutions R Us: $152,186
White Cap: $137,950




Page 146

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years and will begin on or about March 15, 2022.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Anderson Lock and Safe will not exceed a total value of
$555,403.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department Operating Budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.




Page 147



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Track Out Services Agreement - Request for Award (Ordinance S-48375)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Clean Sweep Companies, Inc. dba Clean Sweep Property Services, to provide
track out services for the purpose of ensuring compliance with Maricopa County Air
Pollution Control Regulation, Rule 310. Further request to authorize the City Controller
to disburse all funds related to this item. The agreement will not exceed $766,250.

Summary
The purpose of this agreement is to provide track out services for the Water Services
Department Water Distribution Division.

The services of Clean Sweep Companies, Inc. dba Clean Sweep Property Services,
include, but are not limited to: removing and disposing of excavated material,
construction debris, mud, dirt, rock, sand, gravel, concrete or asphalt from public
streets, alleys or sidewalks using street sweepers, vacuum trucks, wet brooms, or by
manually sweeping up the deposits.

Procurement Information
The recommendation was made using an Invitation for Bids procurement process in
accordance with City of Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Three vendors submitted bids and are listed below, and all bids except for two were
found to be responsive and responsible.

Selected Bidder:
Clean Sweep Companies, Inc. dba Clean Sweep Property Services: $153,250

Other Bidders:
Newman Services, LLC dba American Sweeping: $104,750
Offsite Sweeping, LLC: $132,500

Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about March 2, 2022, for a five-year aggregate term.



Page 148

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Clean Sweep Companies, Inc. dba Clean Sweep Property
Services will not exceed $766,250.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department Operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.




Page 149



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - Talinn Phase 4 - PLAT 210103 - North of Deer Valley Drive and East of
56th Street

Plat: 210103
Project: 06-657
Name of Plat: Talinn Phase 4
Owner: D.R. Horton, LLC
Engineer: Brian J. Diehl, RLS
Request: A 108 Lot Residential Plat
Reviewed by Staff: January 20, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located north of Deer Valley Drive and east of 56th Street.
Council District: 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 150



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - Blueprint Midtown - PLAT 210090 - Northwest Corner of Catalina
Drive and 2nd Street

Plat: 210090
Project: 20-4691
Name of Plat: Blueprint Midtown
Owner: 3010 Westmount, LLC
Engineer: James B. Flack, RLS
Request: A 1 Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: Jan. 19, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public. This plat needs to record concurrently with Abandonment 210030. The
sequence of recording is as follows: the resolution of abandonment is to be recorded
first, then the plat recorded second.


Location
Generally located at the northwest corner of Catalina Drive and 2nd Street.
Council District: 4

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 151



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - West 202 Logistics - PLAT 210056 - Northeast Corner of South
Mountain Freeway and Van Buren Street

Plat: 210056
Project: 20-4327
Name of Plat: West 202 Logistics
Owner: Southern Cross, LLC
Engineer: Jared Hansmann, RLS
Request: An 8 Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: Jan. 21, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located at the northeast corner of South Mountain Freeway and Van Buren
Street.
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 152



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - Desert Sky Multi-Family and Senior Living - PLAT 210062 - Northeast
Corner of 79th Avenue and Encanto Boulevard

Plat: 210062
Project: 20-2134
Name of Plat: Desert Sky Multi-Family and Senior Living
Owner: Westpen Associates, LLC
Engineer: James A. Brucci, RLS
Request: A 2 Lot Commercial Subdivision Plat
Reviewed by Staff: Feb. 2, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located at the northeast corner of 79th Avenue and Encanto Boulevard.
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 153



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - Jackson Street Properties Amended - PLAT 210042 - Southwest
Corner of Jackson Street and 18th Street

Plat: 210042
Project: 03-3206
Name of Plat: Jackson Street Properties Amended
Owner: MT. Shasta Investments, LLC
Engineer: David S. Klein, RLS
Request: A 1 Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: Feb. 2, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located at the southwest corner of Jackson Street and 18th Street.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 154



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Abandonment of Easement - ABND 210030 - 3010 North 2nd Street (Resolution
21998)

Abandonment: ABND 210030
Project: 20-4691
Applicant: Mike Kocourek, 3010 Westmount LLC
Request: The western 12’ of the PUE parallel to 2nd Street from Catalina Drive to the
northern boundary of APN 118-35-083B. The PUE covers the entirety of APN 118-35-
083B which was right-of-way that was abandoned but retained rights as a PUE per
MCR 85-251148 (COP abandonment V-188-84).
Date of Decision/Hearing: July 29, 2021

Summary
The resolution of the abandonment and PLAT # 210090 are to be recorded together
with the Maricopa County recorder on the same day, at the same time. The sequence
of recording is as follows: the resolution of abandonment is recorded first, then the
plat is recorded second.

Location
3010 North 2nd St.
Council District: 4

Financial Impact
None. No consideration fee was required as a part of this easement abandonment,
although filing fees were paid.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 155



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Abandonment of Alleyway Easement - ABND 210015 - Calle Redonda between
54th Way and 54th Court (Resolution 21999)

Abandonment: ABND 210015
Project: 05-1208
Applicant: Mike Ragland
Request: The alley area between 54th Way and 54th Court, from Calle Redonda north
to the corner of the second alleyway that provides access to 54th Court.
Date of Decision/Hearing: Oct. 6, 2021 (City Council Formal)

Location
Calle Redonda between 54th Way and 54th Court.
Council District: 6

Financial Impact
A consideration fee was also collected as part of this abandonment in the amount of
$1,474.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 156



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-SP-3-21-1 -
Southwest Corner of Central Avenue and Alameda Road (Ordinance G-6968)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
from A-1 SP DVAO (Light Industrial, Special Permit, Deer Valley Airport Overlay
District) and A-1 DVAO (Light Industrial, Deer Valley Airport Overlay District) to A-1 SP
DVAO (Light Industrial, Special Permit, Deer Valley Airport Overlay District) to allow the
continuation of a sand and gravel mining operation, concrete batch plant, asphalt
blending plant, and all underlying A-1 uses.

Summary
Current Zoning: A-1 SP DVAO and A-1 DVAO
Proposed Zoning: A-1 SP DVAO
Acreage: 39.54 acres
Proposed Use: Continuation of a sand and gravel mining operation, concrete batch
plant, asphalt blending plant, and all underlying A-1 uses.

Owner: Airpark 30, LLC
Applicant: Paul Gilbert, Beus Gilbert McGroder, PLLC
Representative: Paul Gilbert, Beus Gilbert McGroder, PLLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Deer Valley Village Planning Committee heard the case on Jan. 13,
2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 9-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard the case on Feb. 3, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Deer Valley Village Planning Committee
recommendation, with an additional stipulation, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Southwest corner of Central Avenue and Alameda Road.
Council District: 1
Parcel Addresses: 23742 N. Central Ave.




Page 157

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 158
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(CASE Z-SP-3-21-1) FROM A-1 SP DVAO (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL,
SPECIAL PERMIT, DEER VALLEY AIRPORT OVERLAY
DISTRICT) AND A-1 DVAO (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, DEER VALLEY
AIRPORT OVERLAY DISTRICT) TO A-1 SP DVAO (LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL, SPECIAL PERMIT, DEER VALLEY AIRPORT
OVERLAY DISTRICT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 39.54-acre site located at the southwest

corner of Central Avenue and Alameda Road in a portion of Section 8, Township 4

North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed

from “A-1 SP DVAO” (Light Industrial, Special Permit, Deer Valley Airport Overlay

District) and A-1 DVAO (Light Industrial, Deer Valley Airport Overlay District) to “A-1 SP

DVAO” (Light Industrial, Special Permit, Deer Valley Airport Overlay District) for a

Special Permit to allow continuation of a sand and gravel mining operation, concrete

batch plant, asphalt blending plant, and all underlying A-1 uses.




Page 159
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. Upon abandonment of the Special Permit or prior to any preliminary site plan
approval for any portion of the site for a use not related to the Special Permit, a
reuse plan shall be developed in compliance with the provisions in Section 647
of the Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

2. New buildings or building additions visible from public right-of-way shall contain
architectural embellishments and detailing such as material changes, pilasters,
offsets, recesses, variation in window size and location, and/or overhang
canopies, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

3. A minimum building setback of 50 feet shall be provided along the east side of
the site.

4. A minimum building setback of 50 feet shall be provided along the north side of
the site.

5. A minimum 20-foot wide landscape setback shall be provided along the east
and north sides of the site, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

6. The landscape setbacks along the street frontages shall include shade trees
placed 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings. Twenty five percent of the
trees shall be minimum 4-inch caliper and 75 percent of the trees shall be
minimum 3-inch caliper, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

7. The developer shall dedicate 40 feet of right-of-way and construct the south
half of Alameda Road (Misty Willow Lane) alignment, including a detached
sidewalk, for the full limits of the project per Cross Section E standards, as
approved by the Street Transportation and Planning and Development
Departments.




Page 160
8. The developer shall dedicate 40 feet of right-of-way and construct the west half
of Central Avenue for the full limits of the project, including a detached
sidewalk, per Cross Section E standards or as approved by the Street
Transportation and Planning and Development Departments.

9. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

10. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Deer Valley Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

11. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.

12. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction
analysis review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

13. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

14. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

15. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

16. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.




Page 161
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 2nd day of March,

2022.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)



Page 162
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-SP-3-21-1

The East half of the North half of the Southwest quarter of Section 8, Township 4 North,
Range 3 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona;
Except the North 40 feet; and
Except the East 40 feet; and
Except one-sixteenth of all oil, gas, other hydrocarbon substances, helium or other
substances of a gaseous nature, coal, metals, minerals, fossils, fertilizer of every name
and description, together with all uranium, thorium or any other material which is, or
may be determined, by the laws of the United States or of the State of Arizona or
decisions of court, to be peculiarly essential to the production of fissionable materials,
whether or not of commercial value, as reserved to the State of Arizona in Arizona
Revised Statutes and in the Patent to said land recorded May 18, 1981 in Docket
15242, Page 556, records of Maricopa County, Arizona.

Also described in ALTA/ NSPS Survey prepared by MKA dated August 10, 2020, last
revised August 13, 2020, as Job No. 6565-20-6895, as follows:

A portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 8, Township 4 North, Range 3 East of the
Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, being the same
property described in Special Warranty Deed, recorded in Instrument No. 2018-
0879254, records of Maricopa County, Arizona, more particularly described as follows;
BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of said Special Warranty Deed;
Thence along the North line of said Special Warranty Deed, South 89 degrees 06
minutes 00 seconds East 1226.28 feet to the Northeast corner of said Special Warranty
Deed;
Thence along the East line of said Special Warranty Deed, South 00
degrees 43 minutes 19 seconds West 1299.95 feet to the Southeast corner of said
Special Warranty Deed;
Thence along the South line of said Special Warranty Deed, North 89 degrees 38
minutes 13 seconds West 1254.16 feet to the Southwest corner of said Special
Warranty Deed;
Thence along the West line of said Special Warranty Deed, North 01 degrees 56
minutes 20 seconds East 1311.91 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Being the same tract of land described in a Commitment for Title Insurance prepared by
Chicago Title Insurance Company, Order No. 20001335-040-DO, dated August 14,
2020, Amendment dated August 19, 2020, and the easements, covenants and
restrictions referenced in said
Title Commitment or apparent from a physical inspection of the subject property or
otherwise known to me have been plotted hereon or otherwise noted as to their effect
on the subject property.

The legal description describes the same property as insured in such title insurance
commitment and all property specific exceptions have been noted herein.



Page 163
Page 164



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-74-21-2 -
Northwest Corner of the 29th Avenue and Bronco Butte Trail Alignments
(Ordinance G-6965)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
C-2 M-R NBCOD (Intermediate Commercial, Mid-Rise, North Black Canyon Overlay
District) to C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR NBCOD (Intermediate Commercial, Height
Waiver, Density Waiver, North Black Canyon Overlay District) to allow multifamily
residential.

Summary
Current Zoning: C-2 M-R NBCOD
Proposed Zoning: C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR NBCOD
Acreage: 18.81 acres
Proposed Use: Multifamily residential

Owner: Plas North Valley Land, LLC
Applicant: Bond Companies
Representative: Wendy Riddell, Berry Riddell, LLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The North Gateway Village Planning Committee heard this case on Jan.
13, 2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 3-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Feb. 3, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the North Gateway Village Planning Committee
recommendation, with an additional stipulation, by a vote of 8-0.

Location
Northwest corner of the 29th Avenue and Bronco Butte Trail alignments.
Council District: 2
Parcel Address: N/A

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.

Page 165
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-74-21-2) FROM C-2 M-R NBCOD
(INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL, MID-RISE, NORTH BLACK
CANYON OVERLAY DISTRICT) TO C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR
NBCOD (INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL, HEIGHT WAIVER,
DENSITY WAIVER, NORTH BLACK CANYON OVERLAY
DISTRICT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of an approximately 18.81-acre site located at the

northwest corner of the 29th Avenue and Bronco Butte Trail alignments in a portion of

Section 14, Township 5 North, Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit

“A,” is hereby changed from “C-2 M-R NBCOD” (Intermediate Commercial, Mid-Rise,

North Black Canyon Overlay District), to “C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR NBCOD”

(Intermediate Commercial, Height Waiver, Density Waiver, North Black Canyon Overlay

District).




Page 166
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall utilize the R-5 Planned Residential Development option.

2. The development shall be limited to a maximum of 560 dwelling units.

3. A minimum of 10 percent of the gross site area shall be retained as open
space.

4. A development shall provide a minimum landscape setback of 10 feet between
the shared use path (SUP) along Skunk Creek Wash and any fencing or
buildings on the west side of the site, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

5. A minimum of eight amenities shall be provided and dispersed throughout the
development, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

6. Surface parking shall be located a minimum of 50 feet from the western limits
of the development along Skunk Creek Wash, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

7. All building elevations shall contain architectural embellishments and detailing
such as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, window fenestration,
shadowboxes, and/or overhang canopies, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

8. All building and wall colors and materials shall be in compliance with the North
Black Canyon Overlay District with specific regard to colors being muted and
blending with, rather than contrasting strongly, with the surrounding desert
environment, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

9. A minimum 10-foot-wide shared use path (SUP) shall be constructed within a
25-foot-wide public trail easement (PTE) along the east side of Skunk Creek
Wash on this site or the adjacent FH property per Section 429 of the City of




Page 167
Phoenix MAG Supplement, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

10. Pedestrian pathways, including public sidewalks and excluding the shared use
path along Skunk Creek Wash, shall be shaded a minimum of 75 percent by a
structure and/or trees at maturity, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

11. Where pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles, the pathways shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or another
material, other than those used to pave parking surfaces and drive aisles, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

12. Pedestrian pathways shall be provided to connect building entrances, public
sidewalks, and amenity areas, using the most direct route for pedestrians, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

13. The developer shall construct a minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk and a
minimum 10-foot-wide landscape area between the back of curb and sidewalk
along 29th Avenue and planted to the following standards, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees planted 20 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings.

b. Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the Planning
and Development Department on an alternative design solution
consistent with a pedestrian environment.

14. The developer shall provide secured bicycle parking per Section 1307 of the
bicycle racks shall be provided for guests located near the clubhouse or
distributed throughout the site and installed per the requirements of Section
1307.H of the Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

15. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study
is reviewed and approved by the City. The developer shall be responsible for
traffic signal funding and/or escrow contribution as determined by the approved
Traffic Impact Study.

16. The developer shall dedicate and construct right-of-way to connect to two
separate existing public streets, as approved by the Street Transportation
Department.




Page 168
17. The developer shall dedicate and construct the west half of 29th Avenue, as
required by the approved Traffic Impact Study and as approved by the Street
Transportation Department.

18. The developer shall provide traffic signal conduit and junction boxes at the
northwest corner of 29th Avenue and Bronco Butte Trail and deposit a 25%
escrow contribution for the future traffic signal prior to final site plan approval,
as approved by the Street Transportation Department.

19. The developer shall provide site access to the future identified signalized
intersection of 29th Avenue and Bronco Butte Trail. A cross access easement
shall be provided to APN 204-11-002M for joint use of the signalized
intersection. Connection shall be reviewed and approved by the Street
Transportation Department prior to preliminary site plan approval.

20. All access control placement and spacing shall be in compliance with the
Street Planning and Design Guidelines and shall coordinate to align with
accesses on the east side of 29th Avenue, as approved by the Street
Transportation Department.

21. The developer shall provide a minimum of three shaded pedestrian
connections from the development to the shared-use path along the east side
of Skunk Creek Wash, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

22. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

23. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

25. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the




Page 169
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 2nd day of March,

2022.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (2 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 170
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-74-21-2

A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA & SALT RIVER
MERIDIAN, CITY OF PHOENIX, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT THE CENTER QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14
(REBAR WITH CAP RLS 21081) FROM WHICH POINT THE EAST QUARTER
CORNER THEREOF (MCDOT BRASS CAP RLS 29891 2001) BEARS N89°32'56"E A
DISTANCE OF 2639.42 FEET;

THENCE N89°32'56"E, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER,
A DISTANCE OF 301.40 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE ACROSS SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER THE FOLLOWING TWELVE (12)
COURSES AND DISTANCES:

1) N6°27'00'E A DISTANCE OF 118.59 FEET;

2) N23°24'40"E A DISTANCE OF 152.38 FEET;

3) N26°54'58"E A DISTANCE OF 132.34 FEET;

4) N16°51'03"E A DISTANCE OF 126.06 FEET;

5) N17°31'05"E A DISTANCE OF 3.93 FEET;

6) N26°11'47"E A DISTANCE OF 188.59 FEET;

7) N25°14'28E A DISTANCE OF 97.90 FEET;

8) N28°35'55" A DISTANCE OF 116.75 FEET;

9) N22°21'58"E A DISTANCE OF 85.73 FEET;

10) N35°47'19"E A DISTANCE OF 68.99 FEET;

11) N89°30'23"E A DISTANCE OF 586.64 FEET;

12) S0°21'50"E A DISTANCE OF 992.64 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID SOUTH LINE
OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER;




Page 171
THENCE S89°32'56"W, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1018.31 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 18.9241 ACRES OF LAND
(824,332.43 S.F.), MORE OR LESS, INCLUDING ANY EASEMENTS OF RECORD.

THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION IS S89°32'56"W FOR
THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 5
NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, CITY OF
PHOENIX, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA AS SHOWN ON AN ALTA SURVEY
PRODUCED BY HILGART WILSON AND SIGNED AND SEALED BY JAMES B.
RICHARDS (RLS 40916) ON JULY 15, 2021.

THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS BASED ON THE ABOVE-NOTED ALTA SURVEY AND
DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A BOUNDARY SURVEY PERFORMED BY RITOCH-
POWELL & ASSOCIATES.




Page 172
Page 173



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
***REQUEST TO CONTINUE (SEE ATTACHED MEMO)*** Amend City Code -
Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-20-21-4 - Approximately 1,300 Feet
North of the Northeast Corner of Central Avenue and Indian School Road
(Ordinance G-6964)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
UR TOD-1 (Urban Residential, Interim Transit-Oriented Zoning Overlay District One) to
PUD (Planned Unit Development) to allow multifamily and single-family attached
residential.

Summary
Current Zoning: UR TOD-1
Proposed Zoning: PUD
Acreage: 4.34 acres
Proposed Use: Multifamily and single-family attached residential

Owner: Midtown Central Hotel Corporation
Applicant: Cresleigh Homes Arizona, LLC
Representative: Alan Beaudoin, Norris Design

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Info: The Encanto Village Planning Committee heard this case on June 7, 2021,
for information only.
VPC Action: The Encanto Village Planning Committee heard this case on Sept. 13,
2021, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote 11-3.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case and continued the item on Oct.
7, Nov. 4, Dec. 2, 2021; and Jan. 6, 2022. The Planning Commission heard this case
on Feb. 3, 2022, and recommended approval, per the Addendum A Staff Report, with
an additional and modified stipulation by a vote of 6-2.

Location
Approximately 1,300 feet north of the northeast corner of Central Avenue and Indian
School Road
Council District: 4


Page 174

Parcel Address: 4325 N. Central Ave.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 175
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(Z-20-21-4) FROM UR TOD-1 (URBAN RESIDENTIAL, INTERIM
TRANSIT-ORIENTED ZONING OVERLAY DISTRICT ONE) TO
PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 4.34-acre site located approximately 1,300

feet north of the northeast corner of Central Avenue and Indian School Road, in a

portion of Section 20, Township 2 North and Range 3 East, as described more

specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from “UR TOD-1” (Urban Residential,

Interim Transit-Oriented Zoning Overlay District One) to “PUD” (Planned Unit

Development).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,


Page 176
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. An updated Development Narrative for Uptown Residential Community PUD
reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval
of this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the
Development Narrative date stamped July 12, 2021, as modified by the following
stipulations:

a. Page 12, PUD Development Standards Table (Single-Family Attached),
Add a row titled “Pedestrian connections to Central Avenue” with the
following development standard: “Two pedestrian connections to the
Central Avenue sidewalk from a system of interior pedestrian pathways.
All units with a required stoop frontage type shall be connected to Central
Avenue by a direct pedestrian pathway. The pedestrian connections to the
public sidewalk shall be a minimum 5 feet wide.”

b. Page 12, PUD Development Standards Table (Single-Family Attached),
Add a row titled “Pedestrian system standards” with the following:
 “Clearly defined, accessible pedestrian pathways shall be provided
to connect building entrances, public sidewalks, and amenity areas,
using the most direct route for pedestrians.”

c. Page 14, 4. Shade. Replace with the following language and formatting:
 75 percent minimum shade shall be provided on public sidewalk
along Central Avenue.
 75 percent minimum shade shall be provided on private walkways
through a combination of vegetative and architectural shade but
architectural shade shall not comprise more than 30 percent of the
total shade.
 All interior pedestrian pathways shall be shaded to a minimum of 75
percent

d. Page 12, PUD Development Standards Table (Single-Family Attached),
Add a row titled “Pedestrian system standards” with the following:
“Clearly defined, accessible pedestrian pathways shall be provided to
connect building entrances, public sidewalks, and amenity areas, using
the most direct route for pedestrians.”

e. Page 15, 6. Walls and Fences, Replace the first sentence with the
following “Walls will be in accordance with the wall exhibits herein”

f. Page 15, PUD Wall & Fence Design Standards Table, Replace the
development standards for all perimeters adjacent to private parcels
located near the northwest and northeast corners of the PUD from “6’
minimum; 8’ maximum” to “maximum height of 6 feet.”


Page 177
g. Page 12, PUD Development Standards Table (Single-Family Attached),
Replace the development standards language for “WU Frontage Types”
with the following: “All units adjacent to Central Avenue shall comply with
the requirements of Section 1305, Table 1305.1. For stoop. Units 1
through 14, and 38 to 43, as depicted on the illustrative landscape plan
date stamped February 1, 2022 shall comply with the requirements of
Section 1305, Table 1305.1. For stoop with the frontage oriented to the
south. Minimum width: 60% of building façade”

h. Page 11, PUD Development Standards Table (Single-Family Attached),
Update “Maximum Projection by Porches, Patios, Balconies or port-
cocheres into required Perimeter setbacks” to add “Stoops.”

i. Page 15, 7. Central Avenue Frontage, Replace “Porch” With “Stoop.”

j. Page 8. B. Land Use Plan. Replace all descriptions of “Porch” Frontage
Types with “Stoop.”

k. Pages 9-10, 17, 22, 24, 25, and 30 - 34. Update the figures and exhibits
contained in the narrative to be consistent with the illustrative landscape
plan date stamped February 1, 2022 and add the architectural rendering
figures date stamped February 1, 2022, to reflect the change from “porch”
to “stoop” frontages and the added pedestrian pathway along the south
property line.

l. Page 26, Section E.2. Architectural Design. Add the following to the
beginning of the list and renumber the remaining entries: “The
development shall be in general conformance with the architectural
renderings with specific regard to parapet design, four-sided architecture,
and multiple colors and materials on each building face, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.”

m. Page 3, Table of Contents. Update the table of contents to include the
architectural renderings and renumber pages accordingly.

2. The developer shall dedicate a 12-foot Image Enhancement Easement along the
east side of Central Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

3. The developer shall provide improvements on Central Avenue in compliance with
the Central Avenue Image Enhancement guidelines, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

4. The developer shall dedicate a public access easement along the northern site
boundary to provide legal access to APN 155-25-001L, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.



Page 178
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

6. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed
and approved by the City Attorney.

7. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.

8. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction
analysis review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

9. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

10. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

11. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

12. A maximum one point of ingress/egress shall be allowed onto Central Avenue,
not including the shared easement located along the north boundary of the
subject site. The width of the vehicular ingress/egress shall be no greater than 30
feet, as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department.

13. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition
207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa
County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.




Page 179
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 2nd day of March,

2022.


________________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeff Barton, City Manager


Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 180
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-20-21-4

THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH,
RANGE 3 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20 FROM
WHICH THE CENTER QUARTER CORNER BEARS NORTH 0°15'41” EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 2636.90 FEET;

THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER NORTH
0°15'41" EAST A DISTANCE OF 1352.76 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST LINE, NORTH 0°15'41" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET;

THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE, SOUTH 89°44'19" EAST A DISTANCE OF
250.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND
DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 2009-0913462, MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDS;

THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL, NORTH 0°15'41" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF AND TO A
POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN
DOCUMENT NUMBER NOD-15422 MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDS;

THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE SOUTH 89°44'19" EAST A DISTANCE OF
200.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF
LAND DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 2009-0913462, MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDS;

THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL SOUTH 0°15'41" WEST A
DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF;

THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL SOUTH 89°44'19" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL AND
TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND
DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 1996-0877263 MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDS;

THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL SOUTH 0°15'41" WEST A
DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET;

THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE NORTH 89°44'19" WEST A DISTANCE OF
550.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINS 187500 SQUARE FEET OR 4.3044 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.


Page 181
Page 182



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-70-21-5 -
Approximately 500 Feet South of the Southeast Corner of 75th Avenue and
Camelback Road (Ordinance G-6966)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
R1-6 (Single-Family Residence District) to R-3A (Multifamily Residence District) to
allow multifamily residential.

Summary
Current Zoning: R1-6
Proposed Zoning: R-3A
Acreage: 6.50
Proposed Use: Multifamily residential

Owner: Sheri Ranger, Ranger Homes
Applicant: Daryn Murphy, Commonwealth Development
Representative: Rod Jarvis, Earl and Curley, PC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Maryvale Village Planning Committee heard this case on Jan. 12,
2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 9-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Feb. 3, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Maryvale Village Planning Committee
recommendation, with an additional stipulation, by a vote of 8-0.

Location
Approximately 500 feet south of the southeast corner of 75th Avenue and Camelback
Road
Council District: 5
Parcel Addresses: 4705 and 4735 N. 75th Ave.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.


Page 183
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-70-21-5) FROM R1-6 (SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT) TO R-3A (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE
DISTRICT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 6.50-acre site located approximately 500

feet south of the southeast corner of 75th Avenue and Camelback Road in a portion

of Section 24, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, as described more specifically in

Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from “R1-6” (Single-Family Residence District) to “R-

3A” (Multifamily Residence District).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following




Page 184
stipulations, violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of

the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date
stamped December 14, 2021, as modified by the following stipulations and
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

2. All building elevations shall contain architectural embellishments and detailing
such as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, pop-outs, recesses, variation in
window size and location, pitched roofs and/or overhang canopies, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

3. Building elevations adjacent and oriented to 75th Avenue and the Grand Canal
shall contain a minimum of 25 percent brick, masonry, stone or another exterior
accent material to provide a decorative and aesthetic treatment, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

4. The south landscape setback shall be planted with minimum 3-inch caliper
trees planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

5. Resident bicycle parking shall be provided at a rate of 0.25 spaces per dwelling
unit, up to a maximum of 50 spaces, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. These spaces shall be located near building
entrances or common areas and may be provided through a combination of
inverted U-bicycle racks, artistic style racks, “Secure/Covered Facilities” or
“Outdoor/Covered Facilities” as defined in Appendix K or the Comprehensive
Bicycle Master Plan.

6. The developer shall replenish the existing landscape area within the 75th
Avenue right-of-way with minimum 2-inch caliper large canopy shade trees
placed minimum 20-feet on center and near the sidewalk to provide thermal
comfort for pedestrians, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the
Planning and Development Department on alternative design solutions
consistent with a pedestrian environment.

7. Where pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles, they shall be constructed of
decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments
that visually contrast with the adjacent parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. The developer shall dedicate 70 feet of right-of-way along the east side of 75th
Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

9. The developer shall construct a minimum of two 8-foot-wide shaded pedestrian
pathways constructed of decorative material such as brick, pavers or


Page 185
alternative material providing access to the Grand Canal Trail, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

10. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

11. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

12. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the

validity of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 2nd day of March,

2022.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


Page 186
By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_____________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (3 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 187
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-70-21-5:

PARCEL NO. 1:
THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 2
NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT A POINT 40 FEET EAST AND 33 FEET SOUTH OF THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24,
TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST;

THENCE SOUTH ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 40 FEET EAST OF THE
WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 532.90 FEET TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE EAST 508.25 FEET ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE
OF SAID SECTION 24, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
THE GRAND CANAL;

THENCE SOUTH 41 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE
SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SAID GRAND CANAL 217.31 FEET TO A POINT;

THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH SECTION LINE, A DISTANCE OF
656.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF 75TH AVENUE, SAID POINT
BEING 40 FEET EAST AND 1877 FEET NORTH OF THE WEST QUARTER
CORNER OF SAID SECTION 24;

THENCE NORTH 160.00 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE, TO THE TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF.
PARCEL NO. 2:

THE NORTH HALF OF THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT
RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT A POINT 70 FEET EAST AND 33 SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 2
NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST;

THENCE SOUTH ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 70 FEET EAST OF THE
WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 532.90 FEET TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 60 FEET POINT;



Page 188
THENCE EAST 452.96 FEET ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE
OF SECTION 24 TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE
GRAND CANAL;

THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE GRAND
CANAL TO A POINT BEING THE NORTHEAST

CORNER OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED IN JOINT TENANCY WARRANTY
DEED RECORDED AS DOCKET 6900, PAGE 365;

THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE
OF 502.96 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.

PARCEL NO. 3:

THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 2
NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT A POINT 70.00 FEET EAST AND 33.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24;

THENCE SOUTH, ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 70.00 FEET EAST OF THE
WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 692.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING;

THENCE EAST 656.25 FEET, ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE
OF SAID SECTION 24, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
THE GRAND CANAL;

THENCE SOUTH 41 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST, 237.68 FEET
ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE GRAND CANAL;

THENCE WEST, 817.92 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF 75TH
AVENUE, SAID POINT BEING 70.00 FEET EAST AND 1702.00 FEET NORTH OF
THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 24;

THENCE NORTH 175.00 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING. PARCEL NO. 4:
THE SOUTH HALF OF THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT
RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT A POINT 70 FEET EAST AND 33 SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 2
NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST;



Page 189
THENCE SOUTH ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 70 FEET EAST OF THE
WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 532.90 FEET TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 60 FEET POINT;

THENCE EAST 452.96 FEET ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE
OF SECTION 24 TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE
GRAND CANAL;

THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE GRAND
CANAL TO A POINT BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY
CONVEYED IN JOINT TENANCY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AS DOCKET
6900, PAGE 365;

THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE
OF 502.96 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.




Page 190
Page 191



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing and Resolution Adoption - General Plan Amendment GPA-PV-3-
21-2 - Southwest Corner of 71st Street and Marilyn Road (Resolution 21997)

Request to hold a public hearing on a General Plan Amendment for the following item
to consider adopting the Planning Commission's recommendation and the related
Resolution if approved. This file is a companion case to Z-56-21-2 and must be heard
first, followed by Z-56-21-2.

Summary
Current Plan Designation: Industrial and Mixed Use (Commercial /
Commerce/Business Park)
Proposed Plan Designation: Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce/Business Park /
Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre)
Acreage: 4.21 acres
Reason for change: Minor General Plan Amendment for a mix of commercial,
commerce park, and residential 15+ dwelling units per acre

Owner: Kierland Office Park Condo Assoc, et al.
Applicant: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Representative: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP

Staff Recommendation: Approval.
VPC Info: The Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee heard the case on Oct. 4,
2021, for information only.
VPC Action: The Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee heard the case on Jan.
10, 2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 13-
1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard the case on Feb. 3, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee, by a
vote of 8-0.

Location
Southwest corner of 71st Street and Marilyn Road.
Council District: 2
Parcel Addresses: 7077 E. Marilyn Road.


Page 192


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 193
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION




RESOLUTION


A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2015
GENERAL PLAN FOR PHOENIX, APPLICATION GPA-PV-3-21-2,
CHANGING THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FOR THE
PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The 2015 Phoenix General Plan, which was adopted by

Resolution 21307, is hereby amended by adopting GPA-PV-3-21-2. The 4.21 acres

located on the southwest corner of 71st Street and Marilyn Road is designated as

Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce/Business Park / Residential 15+ dwelling units

per acre).

SECTON 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the 2015 Phoenix General Plan to reflect this land use classification change as

shown below:




Page 194
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 2nd day of March 2022.



MAYOR




ATTEST:


____________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk




Page 195
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney



By:___________________________
___________________________



REVIEWED BY:


______________________________
Jeffrey Barton City Manager




PL:tml:LF21-3649:3-3-23:




Page 196
Attachment B




GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS
January 7, 2022

Application: GPA-PV-3-21-2

Applicant: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP

Owner: Kierland Office Park Condo Assoc, et al

Representative: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP

Location: Southwest corner of 71st Street and Marilyn Road

Acreage: 4.21 acres

Current Plan Designation: Industrial (3.72 acres) and Mixed-Use (Commercial /
Commerce / Business Park) (0.48 acres)

Requested Plan Designation: Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce / Business
Park / Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre) (4.21
acres)

Reason for Requested Change: Minor General Plan Amendment for a mix of
commercial, commerce park, and residential 15+
dwelling units per acre
Paradise Valley Village Planning
Committee Date: January 10, 2022

Staff Recommendation: Approval

FINDINGS:

1) The companion rezoning case, Z-56-21-2, proposes development that is
consistent in scale and character with land uses in the surrounding area to the
north and west.

2) The Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce / Business Park / Residential 15+
dwelling units per acre) land use designation will permit new zoning to be applied
to the site that maximizes opportunities within the Paradise Valley Village within
close proximity to transit options.




Page 197
Staff Analysis
GPA-PV-3-21-2
Page 2


3) The proposed land use designation provides consistency with the land use
pattern of property in the immediate area, while allowing for the introduction of
new uses that will complement the existing employment and commercial uses in
the area.

BACKGROUND

The subject site is located at the southwest corner of 71st Street and Marilyn Road. The
site is occupied by six commercial office buildings, and surface parking areas. The
current buildings are located along the street frontages, while surface parking is
centrally located. The companion Rezoning Case No. Z-56-21-2 is a request to allow
PUD zoning for multifamily
residential and commercial
uses on the entirety of the
site.

Currently the site has a
General Plan Land Use Map
designation of Industrial
(3.72 acres) and Mixed Use
(Commercial / Commerce /
Business Park) (0.48 acres).
The requested General Plan
Land Use Map designation
of Mixed Use (Commercial /
Commerce / Business Park /
Residential 15+ dwelling
units per acre) will allow for
additional housing choices
and commercial uses in the
area. Recent development
patterns suggest that there
is a growing demand for
housing choices and
commercial plus
employment uses in the Aerial Map, Source: City of Phoenix Planning and
Kierland area. The proposed Development Department
General Plan Land Use Map
change will allow for the
continuation of these development trends across the greater Kierland area.

The requested Mixed Use designation will allow commercial and residential land uses to
locate on the site in compliance with the with the companion PUD's development
standards. Maps of the existing and proposed General Plan Land Use Map
designations can be found attached to this report.



Page 198
Staff Analysis
GPA-PV-3-21-2
Page 3



EXISTING CONDITIONS AND SURROUNDING LAND USES

The table below provides a summary of the surrounding General Plan (GP) Land Use
Map designations, existing land uses and zoning surrounding the site.

Location GP Land Use Existing Land Uses Zoning
North (across Industrial and Mixed-Use Commercial office CP/GCP PCD
Marilyn Road) (Commercial / Commerce
/ Business Park)
Northwest Mixed-Use (Commercial / Commercial office PUD
(across Commerce / Business
Marilyn Road) Park / Residential 15+
du/acre)
South (across Industrial Commercial office PUD and
71st Street) CP/GCP PCD
East (across Industrial and Mixed-Use Commercial office CP/GCP PCD
71st Street) (Commercial / Commerce
/ Business Park)
West Industrial Commercial office PUD

Surrounding Land Use Designations, Land Use and Zoning

The site is also approximately 0.2 miles west of Scottsdale Road and lies within the
boundaries of the Maricopa Association of Governments designated Desert
Ridge/Kierland Major Employment Center and is in close proximity to a City of Phoenix
designated employment center. Providing additional housing options in close proximity
to the nearby workforce will add to the sustainability of established office and
commercial uses built around the Desert Ridge/Kierland Major Employment Center.

RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN CORE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES

• CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES;
LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Promote and encourage compatible development
and redevelopment with a mix of housing types in neighborhoods close to
employment centers, commercial areas, and where transit or transportation
alternatives exist.

This request and the concurrent Davis Kierland PUD promotes redevelopment of
the site by allowing for an increase in intensity at a scale compatible with
surrounding properties and the Kierland area. The development is located in a
mixed-use corridor where nearby properties are multifamily or commercial. The
project site is also within a designated employment center. The concentration of
people near employment uses promotes the sustainability of nearby commercial
uses.




Page 199
Staff Analysis
GPA-PV-3-21-2
Page 4



• CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; DIVERSE NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Include a
mix of housing types and densities where appropriate within each village
that support a broad range of lifestyles.

The proposed General Plan Land Use Map amendment will further diversify the
existing land use map designations in this part of the city by allowing multifamily
and commercial uses in a major employment center. This will help to provide
diverse housing opportunities in this area to both current and future residents.

• CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; CERTAINTY AND CHARACTER; DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Create new
development or redevelopment that is sensitive to the scale and character
of the surrounding neighborhoods and incorporates adequate development
standards to prevent negative impact(s) on the residential properties.

The companion PUD narrative incorporates standards that are compatible in
scale and intensity with the surrounding area and properties adjacent to the site.
The development is located in a mixed-use corridor where nearby properties are
multifamily or commercial. Further, there are no existing single-family residential
properties in close proximity that will be impacted by this development.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends approval of GPA-PV-3-21-2 as filed. The request aligns with the
goals and polices of the General Plan and will result in a land use designation that will
continue to support surrounding uses while maximizing the property’s location in an
employment center. This proposed Minor General Plan Amendment request is
consistent with surrounding land uses and General Plan Land Use Map designations in
the general area.

Writer

David Simmons
January 7, 2022

Exhibits
Sketch Maps (2 pages)




Page 200
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-PV-3-21-2_BW ACRES: 4.21 +/-
VILLAGE: Paradise Valley COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
APPLICANT: Nick Wood, Esq
EXISTING:
Industrial ( 3.72 +/- Acres)
Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce / Business Park) ( 0.48 +/- Acres)




Industrial
MARILYN RD
Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce /
Business Park)
Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce /
Business Park / Residential 15+ du/ac)




ST
ST

Maricopa County Assessor's Office

PROPOSED CHANGE:
Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce / Business Park / Residential 15+du/ac) ( 4.21 +/- Acres)



Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce /
Business Park / Residential 15+ du/ac) MARILYN RD




ST
ST


Page 201
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-PV-3-21-2 ACRES: 4.21 +/-
VILLAGE: Paradise Valley COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
APPLICANT: Nick Wood, Esq
EXISTING:
Industrial ( 3.72 +/- Acres)
Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce / Business Park) ( 0.48 +/- Acres)




Industrial
MARILYN RD
Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce /
Business Park)
Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce /
Business Park / Residential 15+ du/ac)




ST
ST

Maricopa County Assessor's Office

PROPOSED CHANGE:
Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce / Business Park / Residential 15+du/ac) ( 4.21 +/- Acres)




Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce /
MARILYN RD
Business Park / Residential 15+ du/ac)




ST
ST

Maricopa County Assessor's Office
Page 202
Attachment C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-PV-3-21-2
INFORMATION ONLY

Date of VPC Meeting October 04, 2021
Request To amend the General Plan Land Use Map Designation
on approximately 4.21 from Industrial to Mixed Use
(Commercial/Commerce/Business Park/Residential 15+
dwelling units per acre)
Location Southwest corner of 71st Street and Marilyn Road

VPC DISCUSSION:

Cases GPA-PV-3-21-2 and Z-56-21-2 were heard concurrently.

Mr. Nick Wood, Representative with Snell & Wilmer, introduced himself and
gave an overview of both e the GPA and Rezoning requests. He went over a
slide depicting a context aerial with heights in the nearby area to show how this
request will be consistent with heights in the surrounding area. He highlighted the
consistency with recently approved PUD cases int eh area. He went over a
setback exhibit reflecting consistencies with recently approved projects to the
south of the subject site. Mr. Wood highlighted the proposed landscape plan
which reflects enhanced landscaping on all street frontages. He also went over
the amenity areas for residents as well as enhanced architectural
embellishments on all building elevations to include the wrapped garage with
living units. He also went over the distance from nearby single-family residential
uses. Lastly, he went over parking requirements and parking provided on the
site.

VPC Discussion:

Ms. Diane Petersen shared that she has concerns with traffic safety issues that
could possibly arise from pedestrians utilizing the private access way (71st St) as
a way to get to Bell Road and/or Scottsdale Rd. She also expressed concerns
with a lack of sidewalks on the private access way and lack of traffic calming
measures. She asked if the applicant could incorporate traffic mitigation
measures on the private access way.

Mr. Nick Wood, with Snell & Wilmer, representing the applicant, shared that the
Kierland Community Alliance (KCA) is currently working with the City of Phoenix
Streets Department in an effort to incorporate more traffic calming measures
throughout the Kierland area. He suggested Ms. Petersen reach out to Amy

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 203
Satterfield, representing the KCA, so she would be informed of current efforts
related to traffic calming.

Public Comment:

None (no show)

Applicants Response:

None




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 204
Attachment C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-PV-3-21-2

Date of VPC Meeting January 10, 2022
Request To amend the General Plan Land Use Map Designation
from Industrial and Mixed-Use (Commercial/
Commerce/Business Park) to Mixed Use
(Commercial/Commerce/Business Park/Residential 15+
dwelling units per acre)
Location Southeast corner of 71st Street and Marilyn Road
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation in the staff
report
VPC Vote 13-1 with committee members Bowman, DiMassa,
Gerst, Goodhue, Hall, Maggiore, Mortensen, Popovic,
Sparks, Ward, Wise, Lesher and Goodhue in favor.
Member Petersen not in favor.

VPC DISCUSSION:

Cases GPA-PV-3-21-2 and Z-56-21-2 were heard concurrently.

The Planning Commission will consider this request on February 3, 2022.
Mr. David Simmons, staff, introduced himself and gave an overview of the
requests to include the character of the surrounding area, General Plan Land
Use Map consistency with the GPA update, and highlighted multiple facets of the
proposed site plan. Further, Mr. Simmons shared several policy documents in
which this request is consistent, helping staff to formulate a recommendation for
approval subject to a series of stipulations.

Mr. Nick Wood, with Snell & Wilmer, representing the applicant, gave a detailed
presentation highlighting the need for housing within an employment center, the
consistency with the character of the surrounding area and how this site will
function with recently approved cases in the nearby area. Mr. Wood also shard
specific details about the site plan, elevations, open space areas and traffic. He
highlighted the setbacks proposed and frontage standards, which will activate the
street frontages and help to create a more pedestrian friendly environment. He
shared the shade study, which will help to reduce the urban heat island effect
and discussed the proposed perimeter landscape treatments, which will provide
visual interest.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 205
Ms. Diane Petersen stated that she has concerns with an increase in traffic and
wanted to know if the applicant was planning any traffic mitigation features on the
surrounding rights-of way.

Ms. Toby Gerst asked if the applicant agreed to all of staffs proposed
stipulations.

Mr. Simmons shared that the applicant did agree to all of the stipulations at the
post application meeting.

Mr. Wood reiterated staff’s comments and stated that his client did agree to all of
staffs stipulations.

Mr. Roy Wise joined the meeting at 6:22, bringing quorum up to 14.

Ms. Petersen shared that she has concerns with the results of the traffic study.
She reiterated that she would like to see traffic mitigation features incorporated in
the abutting rights-of-way.

Mr. Wood went over the projected traffic counts resulting from the traffic study.

Mr. Robert Goodhue shared that traffic on Acoma is of concern. He inquired
about a potential traffic signa being installed at Greenway Road.

Ms. Dawn Cartier, with CivTech, spoke to the traffic mitigation study that was
initiated by the developer for Kierland Sky, abutting to the west of the subject
site. She stated that the study was till in progress. She spoke to Mr. Goodhue’s
inquiry about the traffic signal at Greenway Road as well, which would result in
traffic back-ups due to the close proximity to other traffic lights int the area.

Ms. Petersen shared that Acoma curves and does not have an outlet to
anywhere. She also shared that Acoma has residential fronting on it.

Vice Chairman Joe Lesher let Ms. Petersen know that a petition is required to
submit to the Streets Department in order to get traffic mitigation features
installed, such as speed humps/tables.

Mr. Alan Sparks shared that he supports the project but may abstain from the
vote du to Ms. Petersen’s traffic concerns.

Chairman Robert Gubser requested that staff reach out to the Streets
Department in order to get an Information only item on the next agenda that
addresses a traffic mitigation study int the area.

Mr. Wood stated that the proposed use for the site is the least intensive in regard
to traffic volumes. He requested that the committee recommend approval.

MOTION:
Mr. Robert Goodhue made a motion to recommend approval of General Plan
Amendment No. GPA-PV-3-21-2, per staff’s recommendation.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 206
Mr. Roy Wise seconded the motion.
VOTE:
13-1 with committee members Bowman, DiMassa, Gerst, Goodhue, Hall,
Maggiore, Mortensen, Popovic, Sparks, Ward, Wise, Lesher and Goodhue in
favor. Member Petersen not in favor.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 207
Attachment E


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
February 3, 2022

ITEM NO: 4
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:

Application #: GPA-PV-3-21-2
Location: Southwest corner of 71st Street and Marilyn Road
From: Industrial, Mixed-Use (Commercial/Commerce/Business Park)
To: Mixed Use (Commercial/Commerce/Business Park/Residential 15+
dwelling units per acre)
Acreage: 4.21
Proposal: Minor General Plan Amendment for a mix of commercial, commerce park,
and residential 15+ dwelling units per acre.
Applicant: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Owner: Kierland Office Park Condominium Association Assoc, et al.
Representative: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Paradise Valley 10/4/2021 Information only.
Paradise Valley 1/10/2022 Approval. Vote: 13-1.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Paradise Valley Village Planning
Committee recommendation.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Commissioner Mangum made a MOTION to approve GPA-PV-3-21-2, per the
Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee recommendation.

Maker: Mangum
Second: Johnson
Vote: 8-0
Absent: None
Opposition Present: No

Findings:

1. The companion rezoning case, Z-56-21-2, proposes development that is consistent in
scale and character with land uses in the surrounding area to the north and west.

2. The Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce / Business Park / Residential 15+ dwelling
units per acre) land use designation will permit new zoning to be applied to the site
that maximizes opportunities within the Paradise Valley Village within close proximity
to transit options.



Page 208
3. The proposed land use designation provides consistency with the land use pattern of
property in the immediate area, while allowing for the introduction of new uses that will
complement the existing employment and commercial uses in the area.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.






Page 209
Attachment F

David O Simmons

From: James Wayne mailloux
Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 12:01 PM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: Nicholas J. Wood; ethan edwards; bill entringer; Gary Fairbanks; Jhillier4561@gmail.com;
Phill Killey; Mark Riehle; Amy Satterfield; Tom Stern
Subject: Davis Group presentation to the Planning Commission.


To: David O Simmons,
Paradise Valley Planning Committee Village Planner City of Phoenix


David,

I am writing you to express our support for the Davis Group presentation to the City of Phoenix Planning Commission
this Thursday evening, February 3, 2022.
I apologize for the short notice, but I ask you to include this in the packet for tonight’s meeting. I am copying Nick
Woods, so that he may read it into the record, if he chooses to do so..

They have collaborated with us in discussions. They have answered our questions, including our request to add a dog
park, which they are working on now, and which we expect them to do, as we had requested of them.
Furthermore, we are finalizing financial negotiations for a $100,000 contribution to the Parks Foundation to fund and
assist in improving the park facility at SandPiper Elementary school, in the adjacent neighborhood.

This is in lieu of contributing funds to additional traffic studies, or traffic mitigation efforts, which we feel are adequately
covered by existing agreements with other developers in the neighborhood..

Given this collaboration, and expected outcomes, we support this application, and the Davis Group for the responsible
approach they have shown in their interactions with us on this project.

Wayne Mailloux,
Chairman,
Kierland Community Alliance





Page 210



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing and Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-56-21-2 (Davis
Kierland PUD) - Southwest Corner of 71st Street and Marilyn Road (Ordinance G-
6970)

Request to hold a public hearing and amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section
601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-56-21-
2 and rezone the site from CP/GCP PCD (Commerce Park/General Commerce Park,
Planned Community District) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) to allow multifamily
residential and commercial uses. This is a companion case and should be heard
following GPA-PV-3-21-2.

..Report
Summary
Current Zoning: CP/GCP PCD
Proposed Zoning: PUD
Acreage: 4.21 acres
Proposed Use: Multifamily residential and commercial uses

Owner: Kierland Office Park Condo Assoc, et al.
Applicant: Michael Lee, Davis Development
Representative: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Info: The Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee heard the case on Oct. 4,
2021, for information only.
VPC Action: The Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee heard the case on Jan.
10, 2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 12-
2.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard the case on Feb. 3, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee
recommendation, with an additional stipulation, by a vote of 8-0.

Location
Southwest corner of 71st Street and Marilyn Road.
Council District: 2


Page 211

Parcel Addresses: 7077 E. Marilyn Road.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 212
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(CASE Z-56-21-2) FROM CP/GCP PCD (COMMERCE
PARK/GENERAL COMMERCE PARK, PLANNED COMMUNITY
DISTRICT) TO PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 4.21-acre site located on the southwest

corner of 71st Street and Marilyn Road in a portion of Section 10, Township 3 North,

Range 4 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from

“CP/GCP PCD” (Commerce Park/General Commerce Park, Planned Community

District) to “PUD” (Planned Unit Development District).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,



Page 213
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. An updated Development Narrative for the Davis Kierland PUD reflecting the
changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and
Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this
request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the
Development Narrative date stamped November 16, 2021, as modified by the
following stipulations:

a. Front Cover: Remove “HEARING DRAFT” and revise submittal date
information on bottom of the cover page as follows:
1st Submittal: August 10, 2021
2nd Submittal: October 01, 2021
Hearing Draft: November 16, 2021

b. Reorder pages 42 and 43.

2. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping, and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

3. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study
had been reviewed and approved by the City. Additional off-site improvements
and right-of-way dedications may be required as identified in the approved
traffic study. Development shall be responsible for the cost associated with
these improvements and dedications.

4. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Scottsdale Municipal Airport (SDL) to future
owners or tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents
shall be approved by the Planning and Development Department.

5. The developer shall provide documentation to the City of Phoenix prior to final
site plan approval that Form 7460-1 has been filed for the development and
that the development received a “No Hazard Determination” from the FAA. If
temporary equipment used during construction exceeds the height of the
permanent structure a separate Form 7460-1 shall be submitted to the FAA and
a “No Hazard Determination” obtained prior to the construction start date.

6. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground disturbing activities within a 33-



Page 214
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

7. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 2nd day of March,

2022.


________________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




Page 215
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (2 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 216
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-56-21-2

A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3
NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

UNITS 1 THROUGH 6, OF KIERLAND OFFICE PARK CONDOS, ACCORDING TO
DECLARATION OF CONDOMINIUM IN RECORDING NO. 20031365538, AND PLAT
RECORDED IN BOOK 654 OR MAPS, PAGE 20, RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA;

TOGETHER WITH AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE COMMON ELEMENTS AS
SET FORTH IN SAID DECLARATION AND PLAT AND ANY ANNEXATIONS
THERETO.

THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LEGAL DESCRIPTION TO BE KNOWN AS:

LOT 4, KIERLAND COMMERCE SOUTH, ACCORDING TO BOOK 465 OF MAPS,
PAGE 10, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;

EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF KIERLAND BOULEVARD
AND MARILYN ROAD SE SET FORHT ON THE PLAT OF SAID KIERLAND
COMMERCE SOUTH;

THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID MARILYN ROAD, NORTH 89
DEGREES 44 MINUTES 08 SECONDS EAST, 485.24 FEET;

THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 00 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 52 SECONDS EAST,
213.49 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 44 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 48 SECONDS EAST, 357.90 FEET TO
A POINT ON TH EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 4;

THENCE SOUTH 45 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 12 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID
EASTERLY LINE, 284.09 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 396.14 FEET;

THENCE SOUTHWESTRLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE AND SAID
EASTERLY LINE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 31
SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 150.36 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY;

THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, SOUTH 23 DEGREES 23
MINUTES 42 SECONDS WEST, 22.00 FEET;



Page 217
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, SOUTH 88 DEGREES 23
MINUTES 42 SECONDS WEST, 35.36 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY
LINE FO SAID LOT 4;

THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, NORTH 66 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 18
SECONDS WEST, 104 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE
NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 485.00 FEET;

THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE AND SAID
SOUTHERLY LINE AND THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 4 THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 66 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 25 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF
538.41 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY;

THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, NORTH 00 DEGREES 15
MINUTES 52 SECONDS WEST, 192.20 FEET;

THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, NORTH 01 DEGREES 46
MINUTES 52 SECONDS EAST, 138.22 FEET;

THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, NORTH 45 DEGREES 45
MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST, 37.42 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF
SAID LOT 4;

THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, NORTH 89 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 11
SECONDS EAST (NORTH 89 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 08 SECONDS EAST,
RECORD) 418.38 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.




Page 218
Page 219
Attachment B




Staff Report Z-56-21-2
Davis Kierland PUD
January 7, 2022

Paradise Valley Village Planning January 10, 2022
Committee Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 3, 2022
Request From: CP/GCP PCD (4.21 acres)
Request To: PUD (4.21 acres)
Proposed Use: Planned Unit Development to allow
multifamily residential and commercial uses.
Location: Southwest corner of 71st Street and Marilyn
Road
Owners: Kierland Office Park Condo Assoc, et al
Applicant: Michael Lee, Davis Development
Representative: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations


General Plan Conformity

Current: Industrial and Mixed Use
(Commercial / Commerce / Business Park)
General Plan Land Use Map Designation
Proposed (GPA-PV-3-21-2): Mixed Use
(Commercial / Commerce / Business Park /
Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre)
Local
Marilyn Road 30-foot south half street
Street
Street Map
Classification Local
71st Street 30-foot west half street
Street


CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND
USE PRINCIPLE: Promote and encourage compatible development and
redevelopment with a mix of housing types in neighborhoods close to employment
centers, commercial areas, and where transit or transportation alternatives exist.




Page 220
Staff Report: Z-56-21-2
January 7, 2022


The Davis Kierland Planned Unit Development (PUD) proposes multifamily and
commercial uses that are compatible in scale and intensity with the surrounding Kierland
area and properties adjacent to the site. The development is in a mixed-use corridor
where nearby properties are multifamily or commercial. The project site is also within a
designated employment center, thus the concentration of residential uses in this
commercial area will promote new and existing businesses. The requested PUD will
facilitate ongoing investment and development of the greater Kierland area.

BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES AND SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPILE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new
development and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.

The Davis Kierland PUD proposes landscaping around the perimeter of the building.
Shaded detached sidewalks along 71st Street and Marilyn Road will provide thermal
comfort for pedestrians. The PUD requires that public pedestrian pathways be
shaded a minimum of 75 percent.

CONNECT PEOPLE & PLACES CORE VALUE; BICYCLES; DESIGN PRINCIPLE:
Development should be designed to included convenient bicycle parking.

The proposed development will provide bicycle parking for both residents and guests.
The project also is adjacent to a proposed bike lane along 71st Street and will support
tenants who prefer using alternative modes of transportation to get to work or nearby
entertainment.

Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives
Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) Desert Ridge and Kierland Employment
Center – See background item No. 5
Tree and Shade Master Plan – See background item No. 7
Complete Streets Guiding Principles – See background item No. 8
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan – See background item No. 9
Housing Phoenix Plan – See background item No. 10
Zero Waste PHX – See background item No. 11




Page 221
Staff Report: Z-56-21-2
January 7, 2022



Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning
Land Use Zoning
On Site Commercial office CP/GCP PCD
North (across
Commercial office CP/GCP PCD
Marilyn Road)
South
(including
Commercial office PUD and CP/GCP PCD
across 71st
Street)
East (across CP/GCP PCD
Commercial office
71st Street)
West Commercial office PUD

Background/Issues/Analysis

SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone a 4.21-acre site located on the southwest corner of 71st
Street and Marilyn Road. The request is to rezone from CP/GCP PCD (Commerce
Park/General Commerce Park, Planned Community District) to PUD (Planned Unit
Development) to allow multifamily residential and commercial uses.

2. The subject site consists of one parcel that currently contains six two-story office
buildings with surface parking. The subject site was annexed into the City of Phoenix
on October 15, 1961. At that time the subject site and the surrounding area vastly
consisted of vacant land. This area was planned in 1975 as a Planned Community
District (PCD) of 1,082 acres, previously known as the Desert Springs PCD and now
known as the Kierland PCD, through Rezoning Case No. Z-11-75. Subsequently, the
Kierland PCD went through several amendments since its original approval. The
current CP/GCP zoning designation was established through Rezoning Case Nos. Z-
11-D-75 on June 15, 1994 and Z-11-F-75 on February 19, 1997. Historic aerial
imagery indicates that the first property to develop near the site was in approximately
1997 just west of the subject site and the subject property began development in
approximately 2002. The PCD Zoning District is intended to establish a development
pattern for a larger area while permitting flexibility for specific developments and
safeguards that adequate infrastructure needs are met for the area. The proposed
PUD also proposes to remove the property from the PCD, and the developer will be
required to provide updated infrastructure as needed and determined through the
Planning and Development Department’s site development process.




Page 222
Staff Report: Z-56-21-2
January 7, 2022




Historic Aerials, Source: Maricopa County Assessor’s Office


3. The General Plan Land Use
Map designation for the subject
site is Industrial and Mixed Use
(Commercial / Commerce
Park). The proposal is not
consistent with the General
Plan Land Use Map
designation. A companion
General Plan Amendment
request (GPA-PV-3-21-2)
proposes a Land Use Map
designation of Mixed Use
(Commercial / Commerce Park
/ Residential 15+ dwelling units
per acre). This Mixed-Use
designation will allow
residential and commercial
land uses the flexibility to
locate on any portion of the site
in compliance with the PUD’s
development standards.

The General Plan Land Use General Plan Land Use Map, Source:
Map designations on three sides City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department
of the subject parcel are also
Industrial. To the northeast the General Plan Land Use Map designation is Mixed
Use (Commercial / Commerce Park). To the northwest the General Plan Land Use
Map designation is Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce Park / Residential 15+
dwelling units per acre.




Page 223
Staff Report: Z-56-21-2
January 7, 2022


SURROUNDING ZONING AND USES
4. North
The property to the north of the subject site, across Marilyn Road, is a three-story
office building zoned CP/GCP (Commerce Park, General Commerce Park).

South
Directly south of the subject site, across 71st Street, is a commercial parking lot that
is part of a commercial office development zoned CP/GCP. Abutting the subject site
to the south is a property zoned PUD through Rezoning Case No. Z-14-20-2 that
allows office with minor commercial uses.

East
Directly to the east of the
subject site, across 71st
Street, are three four-story
commercial office
buildings zoned CP/GCP
PCD (Commerce
Park/General Commerce
Park, Planned Community
District).

West
West of the subject site is
a property zoned PUD
through Rezoning Case
No. Z-14-20-2 that allows
office with minor
commercial uses.




Zoning Aerial Map, Source: City of Phoenix
Planning and Development Department




Page 224
Staff Report: Z-56-21-2
January 7, 2022


5. The subject site falls within
the boundaries of the
Maricopa Association of
Governments designated
Desert Ridge/Kierland
major employment center
and in close proximity to a
employment center. The
Desert Ridge/Kierland
employment center extends
east from 36th Street to
Scottsdale Road between
Deer Valley Road and the
Central Arizona Project
Canal, including the area
from
64th Street to Scottsdale
Road between the CAP canal Employment Center Map, Source: City of Phoenix Planning and
and Acoma Drive. Development Department

The Desert Ridge/Kierland employment center profile provided by the City of Phoenix
Community and Economic Development Department identifies the Kierland area as
being comprised of a highly educated, executive, and professional workforce with a
large inventory of Class A office space. Providing additional residential options in
close proximity to the nearby office spaces will add to the sustainability of the
established employment center and the Kierland area overall.

PROPOSAL
6. The proposal was developed utilizing the PUD zoning district. The PUD is intended
to create a built environment that is superior to that produced by conventional zoning
districts and design guidelines. Using a collaborative and comprehensive approach,
an applicant writes a document proposing standards and guidelines that are tailored
to the context of a site on a case by case basis.

Where the Davis Kierland PUD Development Narrative is silent on a requirement, the
applicable Zoning Ordinance provisions shall be applied.

List of Uses
The Development Narrative proposes several permitted uses. The proposed uses
consist of the permitted C-1 uses found in Sections 622 of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance. Additionally, multifamily residential is permitted with a maximum of 261
residential dwelling units.




Page 225
Staff Report: Z-56-21-2
January 7, 2022


The Development Narrative also proposes restricting certain uses that are
inconsistent with the Narrative's vision of mixed-use pedestrian-oriented
development such as auto title loan establishments, gas stations, and automobile
service stations.

Conceptual Site Plan
The development’s main
access point is along the
private drive bordering
the western boundary of
the subject site. The
project proposes a five-
story, 70-foot tall
multifamily building, up
to 75 feet to include
rooftop amenities. The
parking garage is
wrapped by dwelling
units, except the garage
entry point. Two amenity
courtyards are proposed
and are reserved as
private common open
space.
Both street frontages will
have an enhanced
streetscape with a
minimum five-foot wide
detached sidewalk,
Site Plan, Source: Norris Design
framed by landscape areas
that will include trees, shrubs, and live ground cover.

Development Standards
The PUD development narrative proposes development standards based on the C-1
Zoning District. These standards vary from the C-1 standards in relation to height,
density, lot coverage, open space and building setbacks. All other development
standards are comparable.




Page 226
Staff Report: Z-56-21-2
January 7, 2022


The proposed maximum height of the project is 75 feet. The C-1 standards allow a
maximum height of 30 feet. Staff is supportive of the additional height due to
enhanced design elements, placement, and comparable heights with other
developments in the area.
Maximum Residential Unit Count:
Maximum Dwellings 261 dwelling units
Maximum Density 62.05 dwelling units per gross acre
Minimum Lot Width/Depth No Minimum
Minimum Building Setbacks From Property Line
North (Marilyn Road) 20 feet
West (Interior property line) 25 feet
East (71st Street) 20 feet
Minimum Landscape Setbacks
North (Marilyn Road) 20 feet
West (Interior property line) 10 feet
East (71st Street) 20 feet
Maximum Building Height 75 feet
Maximum Lot Coverage 66 percent of total net site area
Common Area Minimum 10 percent of net site area

The lot coverage
proposed for the
project is 66 percent,
while the maximum
lot coverage
permitted in the
C-1 zoning district is
50 percent. However,
additional common
area (a minimum of
10 percent of the net
site area) is being
provided, which
exceeds the
minimum of 5 percent
of the gross site area
required for
multifamily projects.
The required common area per the Zoning
Open Space Plan, Source: Norris Design
Ordinance standards is 9,169 square feet,
while the common area proposed is 15,278
square feet.




Page 227
Staff Report: Z-56-21-2
January 7, 2022


The proposed interior building setback is 25 feet where 0 feet is required in the C-1
zoning district standards. A 20 foot building setback is proposed along Marilyn Road
and 71st Street, which is comparable to the C-1 zoning district requirements.

Landscape Standards
The PUD proposes
landscaping along all
sides of the building.
The Development
Narrative includes
increased landscape
setbacks adjacent to
the street frontages.
Minimum landscape
setbacks of 20 feet will
be provided along 71st
Street and Marilyn
Road. These areas will
incorporate a mixture
of two-inch and three-
inch caliper trees in all
landscape areas and
shall utilize existing
trees where possible.
In addition to the trees,
the developer shall
install a minimum of
five, five-gallon
drought tolerant
shrubs per tree and
achieve 75 percent live Conceptual Landscape Plan, Source: Collaborative Design Studio
ground cover.
The streetscapes along 71st Street and Marilyn Road will include a minimum five-
foot wide detached sidewalk and a mixture of two-inch (75 percent) and three-inch
(25 percent) caliper trees along the public rights-of-way. This exceeds minimum tree
size requirements. The landscaping will provide for a pedestrian-friendly environment
with 75 percent shade on all public sidewalks and 50 percent shade at maturity along
the private pedestrian pathways. The PUD proposes 50 percent live ground cover
within landscape planters which is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance standards.




Page 228
Staff Report: Z-56-21-2
January 7, 2022


Design Guidelines and Standards
The Development Narrative includes design standards that promote pedestrian
circulation on and around the site. The graphic below illustrates the proposed
pedestrian network for the site.




Circulation Plan, Source: Norris Design


Design standards ensure that the building facade will contain 40 percent masonry, 40
percent fiber cement and 20 percent glazing as depicted in the graphic below. Each
unit above the first floor will have at minimum one private balcony per unit and first
floor units will include a private patio. Building corners will provide a change in color
or material from immediately adjacent building sections on floors one through five.
The building corners will include vertical elements that project beyond the facade in
order to provide visual interest, as depicted in the graphic below. The final elevations
and building plans submitted to the City will incorporate the provisions outlined in the
development narrative and shall follow the Design Guidelines of Section 507.Tab A
of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.




Page 229
Staff Report: Z-56-21-2
January 7, 2022




Conceptual Elevations, Source: Norris Design

The PUD Narrative includes standards that require the parking garage to be wrapped
by dwelling units to promote pedestrian orientation onto adjacent streets.
Furthermore, streetscape design standards will provide uniform perimeter design.
Lastly, several residential amenities are also provided, which are outlined further
below.

Parking Standards
The proposed vehicular parking of 1.50 spaces per dwelling unit is consistent with
the Zoning Ordinance requirements for one and two-bedroom units. However, this
standard proposes a reduction for three-bedroom unit as the Zoning Ordinance
requires 2 parking spaces each.

Furthermore, the PUD proposes a minimum of 0.25 bicycle parking spaces per unit
for multifamily development, up to maximum of 25 spaces. These shall comply with
Section 1307.H. of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.



Fences/Walls




Page 230
Staff Report: Z-56-21-2
January 7, 2022


All fences and walls will adhere to the Zoning Ordinance requirements per Section
703. In addition, all screen walls shall include architectural detailing consistent or
complementary to the building facade.

Amenities
The PUD proposes amenities intended for use by residents and guests to include a
clubhouse and fitness center no less than 8,000 square feet. If a fifth floor sky lounge
is provided, then at least three of the following will be provided:

• Lounge area

• Shaded outdoor dining area

• Water features

• Barbeque grills

• Fire features

• Seating nodes

Internal courtyards will include at least three of the following at a minimum:

• Shaded outdoor dining area

• Outdoor furniture grouping

• Two barbeque grills

• Water and fire feature

• Three seating nodes

• Art installation

• Outdoor game

Additionally, other amenities, such as a pool and spa, may be provided on the
parking garage roof deck.

Shade
The proposed shade standards require that a minimum of 75 percent of shade cover
be provided at maturity over public sidewalks and 50 percent shade coverage over
private sidewalks. The required shade standards along public sidewalks exceed the
Zoning Ordinance requirements.




Page 231
Staff Report: Z-56-21-2
January 7, 2022



Lighting Plan
All lighting will be consistent with the standards of Section 704 (Environmental
Performance Standards), Section 507 Tab. A, and Section 23-100 of the City Code.

Signage
The proposed sign standards shall comply with Section 705.C of the City of Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance with some exceptions to blade signs, ground signage and walls
signs.

If the site develops with only commercial uses, then the sign standards from the
Walkable Urban Code would apply.

Sustainability
The Development Narrative proposes several options to incorporate sustainability
principals including drought-tolerant landscaping, LED landscape and exterior
building lighting, and recycling receptacles. The project also proposes retaining
established tree where possible along 71st Street and Marilyn Roads, where possible
and the utilization of low flow water fixtures.

PUD Compatibility to Zoning Ordinance
The PUD proposes building setbacks that are comparable or greater than what is
required by the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance in the C-1 zoning district. The interior
setbacks are proposed at 25 feet, while the Zoning Ordinance requires 0 feet. The
proposed street setback standards are 20 feet, while the Zoning Ordinance requires
an average 25-foot, minimum 20-foot building setback along perimeter streets. All
property boundaries adjacent to public streets will include enhanced landscaping with
five-foot-wide detached sidewalks. Shade coverage at 75 percent at tree maturity will
be provided to increase pedestrian comfort and activity. Regarding open space, this
PUD proposes a minimum of 10 percent of the net site are as common area, while
the Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum of 5 percent of the gross site area be
provided as open space for multifamily uses. The PUD landscape setbacks proposed
are comparable or greater compared to the minimum requirement of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance. The hearing draft of the development narrative requires that 75
percent of trees be a minimum of two-inch caliper and 25 percent be three-inch
caliper planted along all public rights-of-way to include 71st Street and Marilyn Road.

Phasing
The project will be constructed in one phase.

AREA PLANS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS, AND INITIATIVES
7. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan has a goal of treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure that trees are an integral part of the city’s planning and



Page 232
Staff Report: Z-56-21-2
January 7, 2022


development process. In addition, a vision in the master plan is to raise awareness
by leading by example. The proposal includes shaded pedestrian walking paths,
open space areas and greater planting standards than otherwise required by the City
of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.

8. Complete Streets Guiding Principles
In 2014, the Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding Principles.
The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an accessible,
safe, and connected transportation system to include all modes, such as bicycles,
pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. There are proposed detached sidewalks adjacent
to the public streets and pathways throughout the site which provides a safer and
more comfortable pedestrian experience.

9. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
The Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan also supports options for both short and
long-term bicycle parking as a means of promoting bicyclist traffic to a variety of
destinations. The proposal requires bicycle parking spaces be provided on the site.
Bicycle racks shall consist of an inverted-U or other decorative design and installed
per the requirements of Section 1307. H. of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.

10. Housing Phoenix Plan
In June 2020, the Phoenix City Council approved the Housing Phoenix Plan. This
Plan contains policy initiatives for the development and preservation of housing with
a vision of creating a stronger and more vibrant Phoenix through increased housing
options for residents at all income levels and family sizes. Phoenix’s rapid population
growth and housing underproduction has led to a need for over 163,000 new housing
units. Current shortages of housing supply relative to demand are a primary reason
why housing costs are increasing. The proposed development supports the Plan’s
goal of preserving or creating 50,000 housing units by 2030 by allowing up to 261
multifamily residential units and contributing to the variety of housing types in the
area.

11. Zero Waste PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal to
become a zero-waste city, as part of the city’s overall 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and
expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs. Section 716 of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance establishes standards to encourage the provision of recycling
containers for multifamily, commercial, and mixed-use developments. The provision
of recycling is addressed in the PUD narrative. Recycling receptacles and chutes will
be provided in the refuse room.




Page 233
Staff Report: Z-56-21-2
January 7, 2022


COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
12. At the time the staff report was written, staff has received one letter of opposition.
Concerns include change of the character of the area, oversaturation of multifamily
residential in the area and increased traffic.

INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
13. The Street Transportation Department has proposed stipulations requiring that all
streets within and adjacent to the development, shall be constructed with all required
elements, including meeting ADA requirements. Furthermore, no preliminary
approval of plans shall be granted until a Traffic Impact Study is reviewed and
approved by the City. These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 2 and 3.

14. The City of Scottsdale Aviation Department expressed concern with the location of
this project as it relates to the airports flight paths and the 55 and 60 Day Night
Average Sound Level (DNL) noise contours of Scottsdale Airport. The City of
Scottsdale comments and proposed stipulations were provided to the City of Phoenix
Aviation Department for review.

15. The City of Phoenix Aviation Department has noted that the site is within the
Scottsdale Municipal Airport (SDL) traffic pattern airspace, therefore, the developer
shall provide notice to prospective purchasers of the existence and operation
characteristics of the Scottsdale Airport and shall provide documentation that Form
7460-1 from has been filed with the FAA. The requirements are addressed in
Stipulation Nos. 4 and 5.

16. The Phoenix Fire Department has noted that they do not anticipate any problems
with this case and that the site and/or buildings shall comply with the Phoenix Fire
Code.

17. The City of Phoenix Floodplain Management division of the Public Works
Department has determined that this parcel is not in a Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA), and is located in Shaded Zone X, on panel 1760 L of the Flood Insurance
Rate Maps (FIRM) dated October 16, 2013.

18. The City of Phoenix Water Services Department has noted the property has existing
water and sewer mains that can potentially serve the proposed development.
However, there is potential need to up size existing water and sewer infrastructure
mains so that any remodels or new buildings will be able to meet domestic and fire
code requirements.

OTHER
19. The site has not been identified as being archaeologically sensitive. However, in the
event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, all ground
disturbing activities must cease within 33-feet of the discovery and the City of




Page 234
Staff Report: Z-56-21-2
January 7, 2022


Phoenix Archaeology Office must be notified immediately and allowed time to
properly assess the materials. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 6.

20. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and ordinances.
Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements. Other formal actions
such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and abandonments, may be required.

Findings

1. The proposed development is compatible with the existing land use pattern in the area
and is consistent with the proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation of Mixed
Use (Commercial / Commerce Park / Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre).

2. The proposed development contains enhanced standards that will result in a more
walkable, shaded and pedestrian-friendly environment. The development will provide
increased shade which will help to reduce the urban heat island effect.

3. The proposed development will provide additional housing options close to employers in
a designated Major Employment Center.

Stipulations

1. An updated Development Narrative for the Davis Kierland PUD reflecting the changes
approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and Development
Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request. The updated
Development Narrative shall be consistent with the Development Narrative date
stamped November 16, 2021, as modified by the following stipulations:

a. Front Cover: Remove “HEARING DRAFT” and revise submittal date information
on bottom of the cover page as follows:
1st Submittal: August 10, 2021
2nd Submittal: October 01, 2021
Hearing Draft: November 16, 2021

b. Reorder pages 42 and 43.

2. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping,
and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

3. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this development.
No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study had been reviewed and




Page 235
Staff Report: Z-56-21-2
January 7, 2022


approved by the City. Additional off-site improvements and right-of-way dedications
may be required as identified in the approved traffic study. Development shall be
responsible for the cost associated with these improvements and dedications.

4. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and operational
characteristics of Scottsdale Municipal Airport (SDL) to future owners or tenants of the
property. The form and content of such documents shall be approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

5. The developer shall provide documentation to the City of Phoenix prior to final site plan
approval that Form 7460-1 has been filed for the development and that the
development received a “No Hazard Determination” from the FAA. If temporary
equipment used during construction exceeds the height of the permanent structure a
separate Form 7460-1 shall be submitted to the FAA and a “No Hazard Determination”
obtained prior to the construction start date.

6. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground disturbing activities within a 33-foot radius
of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the Archaeology Office
to properly assess the materials.

Writer
David Simmons
January 7, 2022

Team Leader
Samantha Keating

Exhibits
Zoning Sketch Map
Zoning Aerial Map
Community Correspondence (1 page)
Davis Kierland PUD Development Narrative date stamped November 16, 2021




Page 236
CP/GCP




CITY OF SCOTTSDALE
PUD * PCD *
Z-11-C-75
Z-63-20



71ST ST



KIERLAND BLVD
MARILYN RD

CP/GCP


SCOTTSDALE RD
PCD *
Z-11-C-75
PUD *
Z-14-20 CP/GCP PCD *
Z-11-C-75




R1-10 * CP/GCP
PCD PCD * CP/GCP *
Z-48-91 Z-11-C-75 PCD
Z-48-91
AC
OM
AD
R-3A R C-2 PCD *
PCD * Z-48-A-91
Z-48-91


I
DEER VALLEY DR

SR 101
Z-56-21
Miles UNION HILLS DR




A W P EA K PKWY (SR 51)
BELL RD
0.05 0.025 0 0.05
PARADISE VALLEY VILLAGE
GREENWAY RD

THUNDERBIRD RD

CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 CACTUS RD




SCOTTSDALE RD
SHEA BLVD
QU

16TH ST 56TH ST 64TH ST
24TH ST S

TATUM BLVD
32ND ST
40TH ST




APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Michael Lee, Davis Development
FROM:
CP/GCP PCD ( 4.21 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
8/16/2021
Z-56-21 REVISION DATES:



GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
4.21 Acres QS 34-44 L-12 TO: PUD ( 4.21 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
CP/GCP PCD N/A N/A
PUD 264 N/A

* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2021\Z-56-21.mxd
Page 237
CP/GCP




CITY OF SCOTTSDALE
PUD * PCD *
Z-11-C-75
Z-63-20



71ST ST



KIERLAND BLVD
MARILYN RD

CP/GCP


SCOTTSDALE RD
PCD *
Z-11-C-75
PUD *
Z-14-20 CP/GCP PCD *
Z-11-C-75




R1-10 * CP/GCP
PCD PCD * CP/GCP *
Z-48-91 Z-11-C-75 PCD
Z-48-91
AC
OM
AD
R-3A R C-2 PCD *
PCD * Z-48-A-91
Z-48-91
Maricopa County Assessor's



I
DEER VALLEY DR

SR 101
Z-56-21
Miles UNION HILLS DR




A W P EA K PKWY (SR 51)
BELL RD
0.05 0.025 0 0.05
PARADISE VALLEY VILLAGE
GREENWAY RD

THUNDERBIRD RD

CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 CACTUS RD




SCOTTSDALE RD
SHEA BLVD
QU

16TH ST 56TH ST 64TH ST
24TH ST S

TATUM BLVD
32ND ST
40TH ST




APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Michael Lee, Davis Development
FROM:
CP/GCP PCD ( 4.21 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
8/16/2021
Z-56-21 REVISION DATES:



GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
4.21 Acres QS 34-44 L-12 TO: PUD ( 4.21 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
CP/GCP PCD N/A N/A
PUD 264 N/A

* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2021\Z-56-21.mxd
Page 238
David O Simmons

From: Joanne Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 9:24 AM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Case Nos. GPA-PV-3-21-2 and Z-56-21-2


My husband and I own a condo within two blocks of the planned site and we strongly oppose changing the current
zoning from industrial and mixed use (commercial/commerce park) to mixed use (commercial/commerce
park/residential 15+ dwelling units per acre). This area is already over saturated with personal residences and
traffic. Please do not support the changes requested by the applicant. This area does not need more residential housing.
The street off of the proposed site, E. Acoma, is a already a pass through that is highly used to escape traffic from
Scottsdale Rd and Kierland Blvd. Adding the apartment buildings onto E. Marilyn and N. 71 st Street will only increase the
traffic pass through on E. Acoma.

Again, we strongly oppose this project. Leave the area zoned as it is now, industrial/commercial.

Thank you.
Joanne and Jeff Thomas

Sent from Mail [go.microsoft.com] for Windows





Page 239
Attachment D




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-56-21-2

Date of VPC Meeting January 10, 2022
Request From CP/GCP PCD (Commerce Park/General Commerce
Park, Planned Community District)
Request To PUD (Planned Unit Development)
Proposed Use Multifamily residential and commercial uses
Location Southwest corner of 71st Street and Marilyn Road
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 12-2 with committee members Bowman, DiMassa,
Goodhue, Hall, Maggiore, Mortensen, Popovic, Sparks,
Ward, Wise, Lesher and Goodhue in favor. Members
Gerst and Petersen not in favor.

VPC DISCUSSION:

Case Nos. GPA-PV-3-21-2 and Z-56-21-2 were heard concurrently.
1 speaker card was submitted in support, wishing to speak
The Planning Commission will consider this request on February 3, 2022.
Mr. David Simmons, staff, introduced himself and gave an overview of the
requests to include the character of the surrounding area, General Plan Land
Use Map consistency with the GPA update, and highlighted multiple facets of the
proposed site plan. Further, Mr. Simmons shared several policy documents in
which this request is consistent, helping staff to formulate a recommendation for
approval subject to a series of stipulations.

Mr. Nick Wood, with Snell & Wilmer, representing the applicant, gave a detailed
presentation highlighting the need for housing within an employment center, the
consistency with the character of the surrounding area and how this site will
function with recently approved cases in the nearby area. Mr. Wood also shard
specific details about the site plan, elevations, open space areas and traffic. He
highlighted the setbacks proposed and frontage standards, which will activate the
street frontages and help to create a more pedestrian friendly environment. He
shared the shade study, which will help to reduce the urban heat island effect
and discussed the proposed perimeter landscape treatments, which will provide
visual interest.

Ms. Diane Petersen stated that she has concerns with an increase in traffic and
wanted to know if the applicant was planning any traffic mitigation features on the
surrounding rights-of way.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 240
Ms. Toby Gerst asked if the applicant agreed to all of staffs proposed
stipulations.

Mr. Simmons shared that the applicant did agree to all of the stipulations at the
post application meeting.

Mr. Wood reiterated staff’s comments and stated that his client did agree to all of
staffs stipulations.

Mr. Roy Wise joined the meeting at 6:22, bringing quorum up to 14.

Ms. Petersen shared that she has concerns with the results of the traffic study.
She reiterated that she would like to see traffic mitigation features incorporated in
the abutting rights-of-way.

Mr. Wood went over the projected traffic counts resulting from the traffic study.

Mr. Robert Goodhue shared that traffic on Acoma is of concern. He inquired
about a potential traffic signa being installed at Greenway Road.

Ms. Dawn Cartier, with CivTech, spoke to the traffic mitigation study that was
initiated by the developer for Kierland Sky, abutting to the west of the subject
site. She stated that the study was till in progress. She spoke to Mr. Goodhue’s
inquiry about the traffic signal at Greenway Road as well, which would result in
traffic back-ups due to the close proximity to other traffic lights int the area.

Ms. Petersen shared that Acoma curves and does not have an outlet to
anywhere. She also shared that Acoma has residential fronting on it.

Vice Chairman Joe Lesher let Ms. Petersen know that a petition is required to
submit to the Streets Department in order to get traffic mitigation features
installed, such as speed humps/tables.

Mr. Alan Sparks shared that he supports the project but may abstain from the
vote du to Ms. Petersen’s traffic concerns.

Chairman Robert Gubser requested that staff reach out to the Streets
Department in order to get an Information only item on the next agenda that
addresses a traffic mitigation study int the area.

Mr. Wood stated that the proposed use for the site is the least intensive in regard
to traffic volumes. He requested that the committee recommend

MOTION:
Mr. Robert Goodhue made a motion to recommend approval of Rezoning Case
No. Z-56-21-2, per staff’s recommendation.
Ms. Jennifer Hall seconded the motion.
VOTE:

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 241
12-2 with committee members Bowman, DiMassa, Goodhue, Hall, Maggiore,
Mortensen, Popovic, Sparks, Ward, Wise, Lesher and Goodhue in favor.
Members Gerst and Petersen not in favor.

Staff Comments:

None




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 242
Attachment E


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
February 3, 2022

ITEM NO: 5
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:

Application #: Z-56-21-2 (Davis Kierland PUD)
Location: Southwest corner of 71st Street and Marilyn Road
From: CP/GCP PCD
To: PUD
Acreage: 4.21
Proposal: Planned Unit Development for multifamily residential and commercial uses.
Applicant: Michael Lee, Davis Development
Owner: Kierland Office Park Condominium Association, et al.
Representative: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Paradise Valley 10/4/2021 Information only.
Paradise Valley 1/10/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 12-2.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Paradise Valley Village Planning
Committee recommendation, with an additional stipulation.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Commissioner Mangum made a MOTION to approve Z-56-21-2, per the
Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee recommendation, with the additional stipulation as
read into the record.

Maker: Mangum
Second: Gaynor
Vote: 8-0
Absent: None
Opposition Present: No

Findings:

1. The proposed development is compatible with the existing land use pattern in the area
and is consistent with the proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation of Mixed
Use (Commercial / Commerce Park / Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre).

2. The proposed development contains enhanced standards that will result in a more
walkable, shaded and pedestrian-friendly environment. The development will provide
increased shade which will help to reduce the urban heat island effect.




Page 243
3. The proposed development will provide additional housing options close to employers
in a designated Major Employment Center.

Stipulations:

1. An updated Development Narrative for the Davis Kierland PUD reflecting the changes
approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and Development
Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request. The updated
Development Narrative shall be consistent with the Development Narrative date
stamped November 16, 2021, as modified by the following stipulations:

a. Front Cover: Remove “HEARING DRAFT” and revise submittal date information
on bottom of the cover page as follows:
1st Submittal: August 10, 2021
2nd Submittal: October 01, 2021
Hearing Draft: November 16, 2021

b. Reorder pages 42 and 43.

2. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping,
and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

3. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study had
been reviewed and approved by the City. Additional off-site improvements and right-of-
way dedications may be required as identified in the approved traffic study.
Development shall be responsible for the cost associated with these improvements
and dedications.

4. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Scottsdale Municipal Airport (SDL) to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

5. The developer shall provide documentation to the City of Phoenix prior to final site
plan approval that Form 7460-1 has been filed for the development and that the
development received a “No Hazard Determination” from the FAA. If temporary
equipment used during construction exceeds the height of the permanent structure a
separate Form 7460-1 shall be submitted to the FAA and a “No Hazard Determination”
obtained prior to the construction start date.

6. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

7. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER SHALL
EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE WAIVER



Page 244
SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE
AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REZONING
APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.






Page 245
Attachment F

David O Simmons

From: James Wayne mailloux
Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 12:01 PM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: Nicholas J. Wood; ethan edwards; bill entringer; Gary Fairbanks; Jhillier4561@gmail.com;
Phill Killey; Mark Riehle; Amy Satterfield; Tom Stern
Subject: Davis Group presentation to the Planning Commission.


To: David O Simmons,
Paradise Valley Planning Committee Village Planner City of Phoenix


David,

I am writing you to express our support for the Davis Group presentation to the City of Phoenix Planning Commission
this Thursday evening, February 3, 2022.
I apologize for the short notice, but I ask you to include this in the packet for tonight’s meeting. I am copying Nick
Woods, so that he may read it into the record, if he chooses to do so..

They have collaborated with us in discussions. They have answered our questions, including our request to add a dog
park, which they are working on now, and which we expect them to do, as we had requested of them.
Furthermore, we are finalizing financial negotiations for a $100,000 contribution to the Parks Foundation to fund and
assist in improving the park facility at SandPiper Elementary school, in the adjacent neighborhood.

This is in lieu of contributing funds to additional traffic studies, or traffic mitigation efforts, which we feel are adequately
covered by existing agreements with other developers in the neighborhood..

Given this collaboration, and expected outcomes, we support this application, and the Davis Group for the responsible
approach they have shown in their interactions with us on this project.

Wayne Mailloux,
Chairman,
Kierland Community Alliance





Page 246



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing - Amend Airport Height Map - Ordinance Adoption - Text
Amendment Application Z-TA-2-21-7 - (Ordinance G-6969)

Request to hold a public hearing for a proposed text amendment to the City Code, Text
Amendment Z-TA-2-21-7, amending Article XIII (Airport Zoning), Section 4-241(Zones)
to permit up to 250 feet in height at the southwest corner of 1st Street and Jackson
Street.

Summary
The intent of this proposed text amendment is to amend Article XIII (Airport Zoning),
Section 4-241(Zones) of the City Code to permit up to 250 feet in height at the
southwest corner of 1st Street and Jackson Street.

Owner: 39 East Jackson, LLC
Applicant: Phoenix Airport Zoning Commission
Representative: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP

Staff recommendation: Approval.
VPC Info: The Central City Village Planning Committee heard this item on Nov. 8, 2021
for information only.
VPC Action: The Central City Village Planning Committee heard this item on Jan. 10,
2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation with direction, by a
vote of 11-0.
AZC Action: The Airport Zoning Commission heard the item on Feb. 3, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Central City Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Southwest corner of 1st Street and Jackson Street
Council District: 7
Parcel Address: 39 E. Jackson St.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.


Page 247
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING A PORTION OF THE CODE OF
THE CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA, PART II, CHAPTER 4,
ARTICLE XIII, BY AMENDING SECTION 4-241 AIRPORT
ZONING TO AMEND THE HEIGHT PROVISIONS AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 1ST STREET AND JACKSON
STREET.

_______________________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

That Article XIII (Airport Zoning), Section 4-241 (Zones) of the City Code is

amended to increase the height of a parcel located at the southwest corner of 1st Street

and Jackson Street to a maximum height of 250 feet and update the Downtown Zone

Map, as follows:




Page 248
***

B. Height Zone B—Downtown Zone. The Downtown Zone shall be subdivided into
fifteen SIXTEEN contour areas as shown in the attached Downtown Zone Map.

***

3. Maximum building height includes all structures as shown below.

***

AREA 15: 1,700 FEET MSL WITHIN THE COORDINATES:

Latitude Longitude

33 27 17.29821 112 04 57.74605

33 27 17.29253 112 04 54.91001

33 26 49.85140 112 04 54.90606

33 26 50.14964 112 04 57.74074



AREA 16: 1,385 FEET MSL WITHIN THE COORDINATES:

LATITUDE LONGITUDE

NEC 33 26 41.7464 112 04 21.6795

SEC 33 26 40.3868 112 04 21.6816

SWC 33 26 40.3970 112 04 24.6317

NWC 33 26 41.7488 112 04 24.6291

Where an area is covered by more than one height limitation, the more
restrictive limitation shall prevail. Any tree or structure which may be
erected, or caused to be erected, by the City of Phoenix for public
purposes, is hereby exempted from the height limitations of this
Ordinance.




-2- Ordinance G-

Page 249
***

-3- Ordinance G-

Page 250
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 2nd day of March,

2022.


________________________________
MAYOR




ATTEST:


____________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney



By:__________________________
__________________________



REVIEWED BY:


______________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




-4- Ordinance G-

Page 251
Attachment B




Staff Report
City Code Text Amendment
Z-TA-2-21-7
January 4, 2022


Application No. Z-TA-2-21-7: Amend Article XIII (Airport Zoning), Section 4-241
(Zones) of the City Code to permit up to 250 feet in height at the southwest corner of 1st
Street and Jackson Street.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Z-TA-2-21-7 as shown in the
recommended text in Exhibit A.

Background:
This request is to amend Article XIII (Airport Zoning),
Section 4-241 (Zones) of the City Code to permit up
to 250 feet in height for a 1.30 acre site located at the
southwest corner of 1st Street and Jackson Street.
On February 3, 2021, the Phoenix City Council
approved Z-TA-5-20-7 and Z-26-20-7 which amended
the Downtown Code Height Map to allow up to 250
feet in height and removed the Historic Preservation
Overlay on the subject site. A request to remove the Aerial Map, Source: City of Phoenix
conservation easement on the site was also Planning and Development Department
approved.
The Airport Height Zoning Ordinance, established in 1971, protects arrival, departure,
and engine-out procedures around the airport and outlines maximum heights for
buildings and other structures that are regulated by the City of Phoenix. In March 2006,
the Phoenix City Council approved the Phase 1 “Downtown Zone” amendment to the
1971 Airport Height Zoning Ordinance. That amendment changed the Airport Height
Zoning restrictions within the “Downtown Zone” for an area bounded by 7th Avenue to
7th Street and Fillmore Street to Lincoln Street. Cases Z-TA-9-06 and Z-32-08 amended
the Airport Height Zoning text in the City Code to establish height limits for obstacles in
the vicinity of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport that are not covered by the existing downtown
zones.
The Downtown Code, Chapter 12 of the Zoning Ordinance, was approved in 2010 and
governs the allowable heights within the downtown area. The Downtown Code states




Page 252
Staff Report Z-TA-2-21
January 4, 2022
Page 2

that the allowable heights cannot exceed those listed in the airport height limits of the
City Code.
The proposed development is a mixed-use building with ground floor office, retail,
restaurant and hotel uses. The subject site is used as an office building for the Arizona
Opportunities Industrialization Center and is listed on the Phoenix Historic Property
Register as the “Arizona Hardware Supply Company Warehouse” and on the National
Historic Property Register as the “Chambers Transfer and Storage Co. Central
Warehouse.”
The subject site is currently within Area 2 and 4B of the Airport Height Map, which
allows maximum heights of 1,300 and 1,350 feet Mean Sea Level, which are 165 and
215 feet from grade, respectively. Those height limits are lower than the 250 feet
maximum height allowed in the Downtown Code. This text amendment proposes to
amend the City Code to allow a maximum height of 250 feet, to match was approved by




Airport Height Map, Source: City of Phoenix




Page 253
Staff Report Z-TA-2-21
January 4, 2022
Page 3

Staff Analysis
The proposal is consistent with the approved maximum height in the Downtown Code
and is consistent with the allowable heights in the surrounding area. Further, at the time
this application was submitted the Interim Aviation Department Director contacted the
operating airline partners at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport and they do not
oppose the request.
Conclusion
Staff recommends approval of Z-TA-2-21-7 to amend Article XIII (Airport Zoning),
Section 4-241 (Zones) of the City Code as shown in Exhibit A.


Writer
Sarah Stockham
January 4, 2022

Team Leader
Samantha Keating

Exhibits
Exhibit A: Proposed Language (4 pages)
Sketch Map
Airport Zoning Map
Applicant Narrative (11 pages)




Page 254
EXHIBIT A

Application No. Z-TA-2-21-7: Amend Article XIII (Airport Zoning), Section 4-241
(Zones) of the City Code to permit up to 250 feet in height at the southwest corner of 1st
Street and Jackson Street.

Staff Proposed Language That May Be Modified During the Public Hearing Process is
as follows:

Amend Article XIII, Section 4-241 (Zones) to read as follows and by removing the
old map, and inserting the new map as follows:

***

B. Height Zone B—Downtown Zone. The Downtown Zone shall be subdivided into
fifteen SIXTEEN contour areas as shown in the attached Downtown Zone Map.

***

3. Maximum building height includes all structures as shown below.

***

AREA 15: 1,700 FEET MSL WITHIN THE COORDINATES:

Latitude Longitude

33 27 17.29821 112 04 57.74605

33 27 17.29253 112 04 54.91001

33 26 49.85140 112 04 54.90606

33 26 50.14964 112 04 57.74074



AREA 16: 1,385 FEET MSL WITHIN THE COORDINATES:

LATITUDE LONGITUDE

NEC 33 26 41.7464 112 04 21.6795

SEC 33 26 40.3868 112 04 21.6816

SWC 33 26 40.3970 112 04 24.6317

NWC 33 26 41.7488 112 04 24.6291



Page 255
EXHIBIT A
Z-TA-2-21-7
Page 2

Where an area is covered by more than one height limitation, the more
restrictive limitation shall prevail. Any tree or structure which may be erected,
or caused to be erected, by the City of Phoenix for public purposes, is hereby
exempted from the height limitations of this Ordinance.




Page 256
EXHIBIT A
Z-TA-2-21-7
Page 3




Page 257
EXHIBIT A
Z-TA-2-21-7 ***
Page 4




Page 258
AIRPORT ZONING MAP
DOWNTOWN ZONE MAP

FILLMORE ST


250 125 0 250 500
TAYLOR ST Feet



G
R AREA 14 AREA 13 AREA 12 AREA 11 AREA 9 AREA 8 AREA 7
AN 1675' 1650' 1625' 1600' 1550' 1525' 1500'
D POLK ST
AV E Maximum Building Height (MSL)*

AREA 16 = 1385'
VAN BUREN ST
AREA 15 AREA 15 = 1700'
AREA 10
1700' AREA 14 = 1675'
1575'
AREA 13 = 1650'
MONROE ST
AREA 12 = 1625'
AREA 11 = 1600'
AREA 10 = 1575'
ADAMS ST
AREA 9 = 1550'
7TH AVE 6TH AVE 5TH AVE 4TH AVE 3RD AVE 1ST AVE
2ND AVE 3RD ST 5TH ST 7TH ST
AREA 8 = 1525'

WASHINGTON ST AREA 7 = 1500'
AREA 6 = 1400'

Page 259 AREA 5 = 1375'
AREA 4A = 1350'
CENTRAL AVE
1ST ST 2ND ST
AREA 4B = 1350'

AREA 6 AREA 3A = 1325'
1400' AREA 3B = 1325'
AREA 5 MADISON ST
1375' AREA 2 = 1300'
AREA 4B
Map Date: 12/10/2021
AREA 1 = 1275'
1350' AREA 16 AREA 3B
JACKSON ST 1385' 1325' Downtown Zone Boundaries

*Maximum Building Height includes all rooftop
appurtenances, obstruction lights, lightning
UNION PACIFIC RR arresting devices, etc. as shown below. All
elevations are above Mean Sea Level (NAVD 88).
AREA 4A
1350' AREA 3A AREA 2 AREA 1
1325' BUCHANAN ST 1300' 1275'



LINCOLN ST




This Zoning Ordinance does not replace any formal federal or state
review process of a specific project. Requests for building permits
must include building coordinates and an FAA determination letter if
required as per Federal Aviation Regulations Part 77.13.
M:\Projects\Airport_Height_Contours\Airport_Zoning_Downtown.mxd
Text Amendment
CITY OF PHOENIX PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 200 W WASHINGTON ST PHOENIX, AZ 85003 (602) 262-6882

APPLICATION NO: TA-2-21-7 (Airport Height Zoning in City Code) ACRES: 1.30 +/-
VILLAGE: Central City COUNC IL DISTRICT: 7
APPLICANT: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP

EXISTING:
Area 2, 1300' MSL (0.79 +/- Acres)
Area 4B, 1350' MSL (0.51 +/- Acres)


Proposed Change Area

S 1ST ST
Maximum Height (ft)
1300' E JACKSON ST



S CENTRAL AVE
1325'
1350'




UNION PACIFIC RR




PROPOSED CHANGE:
Area 16, 1385' MSL (1.30 +/- Acres)




Proposed Change Area

S 1ST ST

E JACKSON ST



S CENTRAL AVE




UNION PACIFIC RR



Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Attachment C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-2-21-7
INFORMATION ONLY


Date of VPC Meeting November 8, 2021
Amend Article XIII (Airport Zoning), Section 4-241
Request (Zones) of the City Code to permit up to 250 feet in
height
Location Southwest corner of 1st Street and Jackson Street


VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

One request to speak was made for this request.

Nick Wood, with Snell & Wilmer, provided a brief history of the site location, proposed
development, nearby uses, the history of OIC, past text amendments and approvals,
and reviewed the airport height restrictions and their work with the Aviation Department
on the proposed project and that they received a No Hazard Determination from the
FAA.

Questions from the Committee:
Ryan Boyd asked if there was a consideration for updating the entire map. Ms.
Stockham, staff, replied that this is the Airport Height Map in the City Code, and any
update to the map would have to be considered by the Aviation Department in regard
to flight paths.

Vice Chair Nate Sonoskey asked when the last time the map was updated. Ms
Stockham replied that she believed it was in 2008.

Darlene Martinez asked if every building had to go through this process. Mr. Wood
replied that it depends on their proposed height and any change to the Airport Height
Map would need to be considered on a case-by-case basis.

Chair Rachel Frazier Johnson asked if the OIC program will continue to operate out
of the building. Mr. Wood replied that the main office will still be in the building and that
the training programs will take place in other buildings.

Public Comment:



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882

Page 272
Central City Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-TA-2-21-7
Page 2


Michael Kuzman shared that he leases a space as an artist in the current building and
if any consideration will be given to the displacement of those who currently are leasing
space in the building. Mr. Wood replied that his client will work out their contractual
obligations with their tenets.

Comments from the Committee:
Wayne Rainey shared that the community member who spoke did not get a
reasonable answer from the applicant and that he didn’t want members of the public
who attend these meetings to be discouraged and asked that the applicant reach out
and work with Mr. Kuzman.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 273
Attachment D




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-2-21-7


Date of VPC Meeting January 10, 2022.
Amend Article XIII (Airport Zoning), Section 4-241
Request From (Zones) of the City Code to permit up to 250 feet in
height.
Location Southwest corner of 1st Street and Jackson Street.
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation with direction.
VPC Vote 11-0


VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

Committee member Chris Colyer declared a conflict of interest and Will Gaona left the
meeting during this item, bringing quorum to 11.

Sarah Stockham, staff, reviewed the surrounding zoning, land uses, site history and
previous approvals, the Airport Height Map and the proposed changes to the City Code
text and Airport Height Map.

Noel Griemsmann, representing the applicant with Snell & Wilmer, displayed a site
aerial map, historic images, and a rendering of the proposed project, reviewed past
approvals on the site and the Airport Zoning Map and nearby projects and their existing
heights. Mr. Griemsmann reviewed the project outreach and notification area, their
project website and the No Hazard Determination they received by the FAA.

Questions from the Committee:
Vice Chair Ryan Boyd asked how The Summit at Copper Square is taller (254 feet)
that the allowable height per the Airport Height Map which is 240 feet, and asked why
the applicant is not asking just to extend Area 4B of the Airport Height Map over the
subject site. Mr. Griemsmann replied that there was an update to the Airport Height
Map which was done after The Summit at Copper Square was already entitled or built,
and that there is not an area on the map that allows 250 feet which is why they are
requesting a map amendment.

Darlene Martinez asked for clarification on the proposed building and the parking
(automobile and bicycle) that will be provided. Mr. Griemsmann replied that the hotel
operator will work with the developer to provide adequate parking, the hotel will most

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882

Page 274
Central City Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-TA-2-21-7
Page 2


likely have travelers who are flying in rather than driving in, there will be adequate
parking for hotel guests and there will be bicycle parking and amenities provided on
site.

Public Comment:
None.

Motion:
Vice Chair Ryan Boyd motioned to recommend approval per the staff
recommendation with direction that the Airport Height Map be updated to reflect the
current building heights which are not in conformance. Darlene Martinez seconded the
motion.

Vote
11-0, Motion to approve passed, with Committee Members Burns, Gonzalez, R.
Johnson, Lockhart, Martinez, Olivas, Panetta, Starks, Uss, Boyd and Sonoskey in
favor.




STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 275
Attachment E


REPORT OF AIRPOR ZONING COMMISSION ACTION
February 3, 2022

ITEM NO: 3
DISTRICT NO.: 7
SUBJECT:

Application #: Z-TA-2-21
Location: Southwest corner of 1st Street and Jackson Street
From: Area 2, Maximum 1,300 feet MSL (165 feet)
Area 4B, Maximum 1,350 feet MSL (215 feet)
To: Area 16, Maximum 1,385 feet MSL (250 feet)
Acreage: 1.30
Proposal: Request to amend Article XIII (Airport Zoning), Section 4-241 (Zones) of
the City Code to permit up to 250 feet in height for a 1.30-acre site located
at the southwest corner of 1st Street and Jackson Street
Applicant: Phoenix Airport Zoning Commission
Owner: 39 East Jackson, LLC
Representative: Nick Wood, Esq.-Snell & Wilmer, LLP

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Central City 11/8/2021 Information only.
Central City 1/10/2022 Approval. Vote: 11-0.

Airport Zoning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Central City Village Planning
Committee recommendation.

Motion Discussion: Commissioner Johnson made a MOTION to approve Z-TA-2-21, per the
Central City Village Planning Committee recommendation.

Motion details:

Maker: Johnson
Second: Gaynor
Vote: 7-0 (Conflict: Mangum)
Absent: None
Opposition Present: No

Findings: The proposal is consistent with the approved maximum height in the Downtown Code
and is consistent with the allowable heights in the surrounding area.






Page 276
Proposed Language:

Amend Article XIII, Section 4-241 (Zones) to read as follows and by removing the old
map, and inserting the new map as follows:

***

B. Height Zone B—Downtown Zone. The Downtown Zone shall be subdivided into fifteen
SIXTEEN contour areas as shown in the attached Downtown Zone Map.

***

3. Maximum building height includes all structures as shown below.

***

AREA 15: 1,700 FEET MSL WITHIN THE COORDINATES:

Latitude Longitude

33 27 17.29821 112 04 57.74605

33 27 17.29253 112 04 54.91001

33 26 49.85140 112 04 54.90606

33 26 50.14964 112 04 57.74074



AREA 16: 1,385 FEET MSL WITHIN THE COORDINATES:

LATITUDE LONGITUDE

NEC 33 26 41.7464 112 04 21.6795

SEC 33 26 40.3868 112 04 21.6816

SWC 33 26 40.3970 112 04 24.6317

NWC 33 26 41.7488 112 04 24.6291

Where an area is covered by more than one height limitation, the more restrictive
limitation shall prevail. Any tree or structure which may be erected,
or caused to be erected, by the City of Phoenix for public purposes, is hereby
exempted from the height limitations of this Ordinance.






Page 277
Page 278
***


Page 279
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.






Page 280



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing - Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Interior Suites with
Accessory Cooking Facilities Expansion - Text Amendment Application Z-TA-4-
21 (Ordinance G-6971)

Request to hold a public hearing for a proposed text amendment Z-TA-4-21, to amend
Chapter 6, Section 608.D.8 of the Zoning Ordinance to expand the applicability of
interior suites with accessory cooking facilities.

Summary
The intent of this proposed text amendment is to expand the applicability of interior
suites with accessory cooking facilities to the South Mountain, North Mountain and
Maryvale Villages.

Applicant: Taylor C. Earl, Earl & Curley, PC
Representative: Taylor C. Earl, Earl & Curley, PC

Staff recommendation: Approval, as shown in Exhibit A of the Staff Report (Attachment
B).
VPC Info: The South Mountain Village Planning Committee heard this item on Nov. 9,
2021, for information only. The Maryvale Village Planning Committee heard this item
on Nov. 10, 2021, for information only. The North Mountain Village Planning
Committee heard this item on Nov. 17, 2022, for information only. Summaries of these
meetings are provided in Attachment C.
VPC Action: The South Mountain Village Planning Committee heard this item on Dec.
14, 2021, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 9-1.
The Maryvale Village Planning Committee heard this item on Jan. 12, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 10-0. The North
Mountain Village Planning Committee heard this item on Jan. 19, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 13-1. Summaries
of these meetings are provided in Attachment D.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard the item on Jan. 6, 2022, for information
only. The Planning Commission heard the item on Feb. 3, 2022, and recommended
approval, per the Village Planning Committee recommendations, by a vote of 8-0.




Page 281

Location
South Mountain, North Mountain and Maryvale Villages.
Council District: Citywide
Parcel Address: N/A

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 282
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE


ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE CODE OF THE
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA, PART II, CHAPTER 41, THE
ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX BY AMENDING
CHAPTER 6, SECTION 608.D.8.A. (INTERIOR SUITE WITH
ACCESSORY COOKING FACILITIES) TO REVISE MAP 1.


BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

That Chapter 6, Section 608.D.8.a. (Interior Suite with Accessory Cooking

Facilities) is amended to revise Map 1 as follows:


D. Permitted Uses with Conditions.
***
8. Interior suite with accessory cooking facilities, subject to the following:

a. Dwelling units with an interior suite with accessory cooking facilities
are permitted only in residential subdivisions of 15 acres or more and
located within the boundaries illustrated in Map 1, as follows:

(1) Subdivided after July 5, 2019; or

(2) Subdivided prior to July 5, 2019, but with less than 25 percent
of the lots having constructed dwelling units or valid building
permits as of July 5, 2019.

MAP 1: APPLICABLE AREA




-1- Ordinance ________
Page 283
-2- Ordinance ________
Page 284
***



-3- Ordinance ________
Page 285
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 2nd day of March, 2022.




________________________________
MAYOR




ATTEST:


____________________________City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:

____________________________City Attorney


REVIEWED BY:

____________________________City Manager




-4- Ordinance ________
Page 286
Attachment B




Staff Report
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment
Z-TA-4-21 (Applicability Expansion of Interior Suites
with Accessory Cooking Facilities)
November 15, 2021

Application No. Z-TA-4-21: Chapter 6, Section 608.D.8.a. (Interior Suite with
Accessory Cooking Facilities) of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to expand the
applicability of interior suites with accessory cooking facilities to the South Mountain,
North Mountain and Maryvale Villages.

Staff recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Z-TA-4-21 as shown in
Exhibit A.

Background and Purpose
In 2019, City Council adopted an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance (G-6592) to
allow an accessory cooking facility within new single-family subdivisions and partially
developed single-family subdivisions that were abandoned during the economic
downturn, with conditions as well as location and size limitations to address
multigenerational housing while maintaining a single-family neighborhood character.

An interior suite with a cooking facility is a
semi-private space (teal area) under the same
roof in a single-family home within the main
building envelope (purple area) with additional
amenities such as refrigerators,
sinks/disposals, dishwashers, microwaves,
range/oven, washer/dryers, and counter/food
prep areas. These spaces have been and
continue to be utilized for aging parents or
adult children to allow different generations
their own semi-private living space or
dedicated spaces for leisure (tv/game rooms),
offices, or hosting guests.




Page 287
Z-TA-4-21
January 6, 2022 Planning Commission

To facilitate orderly development of an interior suite with accessory cooking facilities
while protecting the character of existing single-family neighborhoods the application of
an interior suite with accessory cooking facilities are limited to new subdivisions that are
15-acres or larger in the applicable villages subdivided after July 5, 2019 (effective date
of the ordinance) or previously subdivided with less than 25% of the lots having
constructed dwelling units or valid building permits.

In addition to the location and size criteria, interior suites with accessory cooking
facilities must be under the same roof as the home, and be a maximum size of 30% of
the total net floor area or 800 square feet (whichever is less). In addition, properties may
only have a single meter, mail service and access point.

There is a design requirement to address the building elevation visible from the street
and there is a limit on the dedicated space for parking to ensure the single-family
neighborhood character is maintained.

The initial applicable areas were limited to the following Village boundaries: Rio Vista,
North Gateway, Desert View, Deer Valley, Paradise Valley, Laveen, Estrella and
Ahwatukee Foothills. These villages had majority of vacant residentially zoned land of
15-acres or more.




Page 288
Z-TA-4-21
January 6, 2022 Planning Commission

The intent of this change is to expand the applicability of interior suites with cooking
facilities to the South Mountain, North Mountain and Maryvale Villages as illustrated in
Map 1 below.

MAP 1: APPLICABLE AREA




Page 289
Z-TA-4-21
January 6, 2022 Planning Commission

The proposed text amendment is supported by the Phoenix General Plan and
establishes the tools to carry out the Core Value and achieve the following goal:

CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES & NEIGHBORHOODS; DIVERSE
NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Include a mix of housing types and
densities where appropriate within each village that support a broad range of
lifestyles.

TOOLS - POLICIES AND ACTIONS: Research and revise city codes and
ordinances when appropriate to allow modifications that will facilitate greater
flexibility for neighborhoods and single-family residences to
accommodate aging family members (next generation home product).

The proposed text amendment would expand the accessibility of different housing types
and address a growing demand for multigenerational housing where aging parents or
adult children can have their own semi-private space with cooking facilities while still
living under the same roof.

Conclusion
This text amendment will amend Chapter 6, Section 608.D.8.a (Interior Suite with
Accessory Cooking Facilities) of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to expand the
applicability of interior suites with accessory cooking facilities to the South Mountain,
North Mountain and Maryvale Villages.

Staff recommends approval of Z-TA-4-21 as proposed in Exhibit A.

Writer
T. Gomes
11/15/21

Team Leader
Joshua Bednarek

Exhibits
A. Proposed Language




Page 290
EXHIBIT A
Text Amendment Z-TA-4-21:
Applicability Expansion of Interior Suites with Accessory Cooking Facilities

Proposed Language:


Amend Chapter 6, Section 608.D.8.a. (Interior Suite with Accessory Cooking
Facilities) to revised Map 1 as follows:
D. Permitted Uses with Conditions.
***
8. Interior suite with accessory cooking facilities, subject to the following:

a. Dwelling units with an interior suite with accessory cooking facilities
are permitted only in residential subdivisions of 15 acres or more and
located within the boundaries illustrated in Map 1, as follows:
(1) Subdivided after July 5, 2019; or
(2) Subdivided prior to July 5, 2019, but with less than 25 percent
of the lots having constructed dwelling units or valid building
permits as of July 5, 2019.
MAP 1: APPLICABLE AREA




Page 291
Page 292
b. An interior suite with accessory cooking facilities shall only be part of
a single-family detached dwelling unit and must be under the same
roof structure. only one interior suite with accessory cooking facilities
shall be permitted per lot and shall be located on the ground floor.
c. The square footage of the interior suite with accessory cooking
facilities shall not exceed 30 percent of the total net floor area or 800
square feet (whichever is less). Garage or patio areas shall not be
included for the purpose of this calculation.
d. An interior suite with accessory cooking facilities shall not have utility
services that are metered separately from the remainder of the

Page 293
dwelling unit.
e. At least one internal doorway shall be provided between the interior
suite with accessory cooking facilities and the remainder of the
dwelling unit.
f. An interior suite with accessory cooking facilities shall not have a
private yard area that is fenced or walled off from the remainder of
the lot. This requirement shall not prohibit required pool fences,
fenced in animal areas, garden fencing, or other fencing used for
different purposes.
g. No more than one parking space, which may be covered or
enclosed, shall be provided for an interior suite with accessory
cooking facilities in addition to the parking provided for the remainder
of the dwelling unit, with a maximum of four spaces total. This
requirement does not apply to parking that may occur on the
driveway in front of the garage(s).
h. An interior suite with accessory cooking facilities shall not have a
parking space served by a driveway separated from the main
driveway and parking areas provided for the remainder of the
dwelling unit.
i. An interior suite with accessory cooking facilities shall not provide
separate mail service or have a separate address from the
remainder of the dwelling unit.
j. Design requirements. Elevations must minimize any secondary entry
visible from the street and have the appearance of a single-family
home. This shall be treated as a presumption as outlined in Section
507.C.2.
***




Page 294
ATTACHMENT C
TA-4-21
Interior Suite with Accessory Cooking Facilities Expansion
(FOR INFORMATION) - Village Planning Committee Summary Results
Village Date Comments
South Mountain 11/9/21 Consider language to discourage wall insulation between the
interior site and primary living space, discourage dead-bolts,
discourage separate entrance to interior suite from the outside to
avoid this from becoming multifamily.
Maryvale 11/10/21 No comments
North Mountain 11/17/21 No comments




Page 295 2/9/2022
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-4-21
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting November 9, 2021
Request Presentation and discussion on a request to amend
Chapter 6, Section 608.D.8 of the Zoning Ordinance to
expand the applicability of interior suite with accessory
cooking facilities.

VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

Rod Jarvis, with Earl and Curley PC, introduced himself as the applicant and
provided an overview of the request. This proposed text amendment will help
multigenerational households by allowing interior suites with cooking facilities
across the Maryvale, North Mountain and South Mountain Villages. He discussed
multigenerational households and provided examples of interior suite spaces. In
2019, a city-initiated text amendment was approved which allowed these types of
uses in parts of the city due to the amount of vacant land available. He discussed
different appliance types that are permitted in these suites and described the
criteria that is currently in the Zoning Ordinance which regulates these. He
discussed examples of interior suites and asked for the text amendment case to
be approved.

Marcia Busching feels that this is a good idea but wonders why not expanding
this option citywide. How can this be accomplished? Mr. Jarvis responded that
the main reason for not expanding it citywide is due to concerns over changing
existing neighborhoods. However, you can inform staff about this.

Lee Coleman asked if it would be simpler to rezone these communities to
multifamily since they have more than one kitchen. Mr. Jarvis responded that
this proposal balances the single-family feel while promoting multiple
generations.

Mr. Coleman asked how one can prevent the suite from being turned into a
short-term rental. Mr. Jarvis responded that currently this cannot be prevented,
and that having a range will not make it more appealing to short-term renters.
People on vacation will not want to use an oven most likely.

Mr. Coleman discussed creative ways that people can circumvent the process.
Mr. Jarvis agreed.




Page 296
Vice Chair Marchuk stated that this seems like a good idea for existing homes
as well but has two main concerns with the proposal. He has seen up to three
families living in the same home due to rising housing costs.

• The suite having a separate entrance from the main house.
• The possibility of walling-off the suite and insulate it.

Mr. Jarvis responded that this text amendment is not creating the issue, as this
is often done illegally. This proposal accommodates people that want to follow
the rules.

Vice Chair Marchuk wants to ensure that the suite is not treated as an isolated
unit.

Greg Brownell stated that people destined to live in these suites will eventually
die and wonders what will happen to the suite. Anyone can convert the suites
into multifamily but feels that this is a step in the right direction. Mr. Jarvis
responded that multigenerational households apply to older and younger
generations. This proposal preserves the single-family nature of the community.

Vice Chair Marchuk asked for clarification on the scope of the text amendment.
He is interested whether this proposal can address the issues presented.

Mr. Jarvis responded that he believes it is workable to incorporate limitations on
having deadbolts, no solid doors, and having no insulation on the walls.
However, amending these sections will cause non-conformities in many homes
that have already been constructed.

Mr. Coleman stated that the city cannot enforce what type of locks, insulation
and other elements are used in these homes. This is a multifamily use being
proposed.

Mr. Jarvis responded that no building permits are needed to change a door lock,
thus agrees. The proposal will maintain the character by keeping single-
driveways and unchanged exterior of the home.

Chairwoman Daniels helped design a similar concept for a home in the far west
valley and loves this concept. Due to the high costs of living, is a very popular
product that benefits families with adult children and elderly relatives. She likes
the fact that suites can have separate entrances. She thanked the presenter and
concluded the discussion.

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:

None.




Page 297
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-4-21
INFORMATION ONLY


Date of VPC Meeting November 10, 2021
Request Amend Chapter 6, Section 608.D.8 of the Zoning
Ordinance to expand the applicability of interior suite
with accessory cooking facilities


VPC DISCUSSION:
Committee members Sandra Oviedo joined the meeting at this time and Ken Dubose
left, bringing quorum to 8.

Taylor Earl, with Earl and Curley, PC, introduced the proposed text amendment which
is to expand the option of interior suites with cooking facilities to three additional
Villages (North Mountain, South Mountain and Maryvale), with no changes to the
existing requirements as listed in the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Earl explained that
multigenerational housing is needed, by 2030 all baby boomers will have shifted into the
ranks of the older population, and that an interior suite has a door between the main
house and the suite, is not a separate dwelling unit and has been permitted within the
city for a long time. Mr. Earl explained that in 2019, TA-6-18 allowed for interior suites to
have an oven, which makes it another dwelling unit. Mr. Earl added that the original text
amendment allowed for interior suites with accessory kitchen facilities to be permitted in
8 Villages (Rio Vista, North Gateway, Desert View, Deer Valley, Paradise Valley,
Estrella, Laveen and Ahwatukee Foothills) which were the Villages with the greatest
amount of vacant land with the acreage to meet the size criteria. Mr. Earl added that this
request is to expand the option to build interior suites with cooking facilities to the North
Mountain, South Mountain and Maryvale Villages, and clarified that the cooking facility
is for a stove/oven. Mr. Earl reviewed the existing requirements for interior suites with
cooking facilities, which would be extended to the three proposed Villages if this
proposal was approved. The requirements are that the interior suites with cooking
facilities are permitted in new subdivisions of 15 acres or more (or subdivided prior to
July 5, 2019 but with less than 25 percent of the lots under construction), under one roof
with the remainder of the house, on the ground floor, the square footage shall not be
more than 30 percent of the total net floor area of the house, shall not have a separate
utility meter, address, driveway or yard area, and shall have no more than one parking
space, shall have at least one internal door to the remainder of the house and shall be
designed so that the second entry is minimized if viewed from the street. Mr. Earl
showed examples of interior suites and interior suites with cooking facilities and shared
that this product type provides for more independence with the oven, and it is difficult

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 298
when an older person feels like they are losing their independence, and that during the
pandemic they recognized that senior living facilities might not be the solution for
everyone, and some might want to live with their families.

Questions from the Committee:
Mike Weber asked why North Mountain, South Mountain and Maryvale Villages were
originally exclude from the original text amendment and for clarification on how the
acreage minimum correlates to allowing an extra cooking facility. Mr. Earl responded
that the 8 Villages which were included in the original text amendment had the largest
quantity of vacant parcels of 15 acres or more, which would be considered the first level
of applicability. The next three, which are being proposed in this text amendment
represent the next level of Villages which have available land large enough to allow this
type of development. Mr. Earl added that the acreage minimum is a systematic way to
limit the applicability, so it is not misused and to get support for the text amendment.

Chair Gene Derie asked the applicant to clarify is this text amendment would apply for
new construction and not remodels. Mr. Earl replied affirmatively.

Alvin Battle asked about the size of the interior suite and how large the remaining
house is for this product type. Mr. Earl replied that the product type he showed pictures
of is a one-bedroom interior suite with a living room, and the remainder of the house
varies from three to four bedrooms, and sometimes is multiple stories.

Public Comment:
None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 299
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-4-21
INFORMATION ONLY


Date of VPC Meeting November 17, 2021
Request Amend Chapter 6, Section 608.D.8 of the Zoning
Ordinance to expand the applicability of interior suite
with accessory cooking facilities


VPC DISCUSSION:

No speaker cards were received on this item.

At this time, O’Hara departed and Ford, Sommacampagna, Veidmark arrived bringing
the quorum to 13 members (11 being required for a quorum).

APPLICANT PRESENTATION

Taylor Earl, of Earl and Curley, presented on the request to amend the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance to allow accessory cooking facilities in certain circumstances. A few years
ago, a similar text amendment made interior suites with accessory cooking facilities
permitted in 8 of the 15 villages. This text amendment would allow these new housing
types in North Mountain, Maryvale, and the South Mountain Villages.

The city currently allows the construction of accessory living quarters that do not include
an oven, range, or utility connections that would allow such facilities; the proposed text
amendment would allow for the installation of accessory cooking facilities in residential
applications subject to conditions. The text amendment proposes a series of conditions
including a restriction to allow only in new subdivision greater than 15 acres, to limit the
interior suite to 30 percent of the structure, to require the suite be accessed from the
interior of the structure, and to requirement to prohibit a private yard for the interior
suite. The target market is multigenerational households.

QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE

Veidmark asked about the origin of the 15-acre minimum. Earl shared that he is
representing Lennar Homes. Their NextGen homes are a proven product in the region
but that some additional protections were necessary for political support. The 15-acre
minimum targets institutional homebuilders that are experienced at building thoughtful
communities and this experience will ensure the product not become problematic.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 300
Barraza asked if there is anything to restrict based on familial status or if there is
potential for this to open these communities to short term rentals. Earl responded that
the Federal Fair Housing Act presents some challenges to regulating housing based on
familial status. Accessory units without cooking facilities are currently allowed and the
addition of a range or over would likely not be a substantial draw for most short-term
renters. Additionally, Lennar includes a deed restriction on all their homes with NextGen
units to prohibit owners from leasing the interior suite separate from the remainder of
the house while also prohibiting leases of less than 6 months.

Sommacampagna stated that he supports housing diversity. He asked why the 220V
utility was selected by the city as a threshold. Earl responded that a 220V connection
requires a building permit and is therefore an enforceable threshold.

Vice Chair Jaramillo expressed support for multigenerational housing and asked if this
would help or hinder subsequent efforts to legalize accessory dwelling units (ADUs)
more broadly within the city. Earl responded that these are separate and distinct from
ADUs so it will not have a negative impact. The regulation rubric developed in this text
amendment should be adaptable to regulating ADUs in a later process.

Veidmark asked how this will impact infrastructure planning throughout the city and
whether this will now require calculations to assume a density of two dwellings per
home. Earl responded that people are already building casitas and that this is expected
to be a small part of the much larger housing picture. Klimek concurred.

Steinmetz asked Earl to clarify the difference between what is allowed today versus
what would be allowed in the future. Earl responded that the comparison photos show
that a microwave would be allowed today but that an oven or cooktop would not be
permitted.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.

APPLICANT RESPONSE
None.

FLOOR/PUBLIC DISCUSSION CLOSED: COMMITTEE DISCUSSION
None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 301
ATTACHMENT D
TA-4-21
Interior Suite with Accessory Cooking Facilities Expansion
(FOR RECOMMENDATION) - Village Planning Committee Summary Results
Village Date Recommendations Vote
South Mountain 12/14/21 Approval per staff recommendation. 9-1
Maryvale 1/12/22 Approval per staff recommendation. 10-0
North Mountain 1/19/22 Approval per staff recommendation. 13-1




Page 302
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-4-21

Date of VPC Meeting December 14, 2021
Request Presentation, discussion, and possible recommendation
on a request to amend Chapter 6, Section 608.D.8 of the
Zoning Ordinance to expand the applicability of interior
suite with accessory cooking facilities.
Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation.
Vote 9-1; Members Aldama, Brooks, Busching, Hare,
Holmerud, Shepard, Viera, Marchuk and Daniels in favor;
Member Coleman in dissent.

VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

No members of the public registered to speak on this item.

Enrique Bojórquez, staff, introduced himself and provided a presentation on
case Z-TA-4-21. He provided an overview of the request, noting the proposed
expansion on the applicability area. He also provided a summary of interior
suites, and background on the 2018 text amendment for this section of the
Zoning Ordinance. He concluded the presentation by providing a schedule on the
text amendment case.

Rod Jarvis, with Earl and Curley PC, introduced himself as the applicant and
provided an overview of the request.

Marcia Busching supports this proposal but wonders why this request does not
propose to expand these provisions citywide. Mr. Bojórquez responded that this
text amendment was privately filed, thus not a city-initiated request. He will share
the suggestion with others in the department for future consideration.

Vice Chair Marchuk asked for clarification on the scope of the text amendment
case. He would support a broader expansion of this provision citywide. Mr.
Bojórquez responded that the scope of this request is limited to the expansion of
the applicability area for interior suites.

Mr. Jarvis stated that this request is a step in the right direction.

Gene Holmerud and Chairwoman Daniels support this request.




Page 303
Vice Chair Marchuk asked for clarification on how these provisions could be
expanded citywide. Mr. Bojórquez responded that a private application could be
filed, or the Planning Commission could initiate a text amendment request given
other considerations.

Lee Coleman asked if a use permit was an option to utilize this provision of the
code. Mr. Bojórquez responded that a use permit was not an option and a text
amendment was necessary to expand this provision of the code.

Chairwoman Daniels asked for further discussion or a motion on this case.


MOTION:

Mr. Coleman motioned to deny case Z-TA-4-21. This motion failed due to lack of
a second.

Chairwoman Daniels asked for subsequent motions.

MOTION:

Ms. Busching motioned to approve case Z-TA-4-21 per the staff
recommendation in Exhibit A of the staff report. Mr. Holmerud seconded the
motion.

VOTE:

9-1, motion passed; Members Aldama, Brooks, Busching, Hare, Holmerud,
Shepard, Viera, Marchuk and Daniels in favor; Member Coleman in dissent.

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:

None.




Page 304
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-4-21


Date of VPC Meeting January 12, 2022
Request Amend Chapter 6, Section 608.D.8 of the Zoning
Ordinance to expand the applicability of interior suite
with accessory cooking facilities
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 10-0


VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

Sarah Stockham, staff, reviewed the existing applicability area for interior suites
with accessory cooking facilities, displayed the ordinance map, reviewed the
existing requirements and applicability area and the request to expand the option
of interior suites with cooking facilities to three additional Villages (North
Mountain, South Mountain and Maryvale), and reviewed the hearing dates for the
proposal.

Taylor Earl, with Earl and Curley, PC, introduced the proposed text amendment
which is to expand the option of interior suites with cooking facilities to three
additional Villages (North Mountain, South Mountain and Maryvale), with no
changes to the existing requirements as listed in the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Earl
explained that multigenerational housing is needed, by 2030 all baby boomers
will have shifted into the ranks of the older population, and that an interior suite
has a door between the main house and the suite, is not a separate dwelling unit
and has been permitted within the city for a long time. Mr. Earl explained that in
2019, TA-6-18 allowed for interior suites to have an oven, which makes it another
dwelling unit. Mr. Earl added that the original text amendment allowed for interior
suites with accessory kitchen facilities to be permitted in 8 Villages (Rio Vista,
North Gateway, Desert View, Deer Valley, Paradise Valley, Estrella, Laveen and
Ahwatukee Foothills) which were the Villages with the greatest amount of vacant
land with the acreage to meet the size criteria. Mr. Earl added that this request is
to expand the option to build interior suites with cooking facilities to the North
Mountain, South Mountain and Maryvale Villages, and clarified that the cooking
facility is for a stove/oven. Mr. Earl reviewed the existing requirements for interior
suites with cooking facilities, which would be extended to the three proposed
Villages if this proposal was approved. The requirements are that the interior
suites with cooking facilities are permitted in new subdivisions of 15 acres or
more (or subdivided prior to July 5, 2019 but with less than 25 percent of the lots
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 305
under construction), under one roof with the remainder of the house, on the
ground floor, the square footage shall not be more than 30 percent of the total
net floor area of the house, shall not have a separate utility meter, address,
driveway or yard area, and shall have no more than one parking space, shall
have at least one internal door to the remainder of the house and shall be
designed so that the second entry is minimized if viewed from the street. Mr. Earl
showed examples of interior suites and interior suites with cooking facilities and
shared that this product type provides for more independence with the oven, and
it is difficult when an older person feels like they are losing their independence,
and that during the pandemic they recognized that senior living facilities might
not be the solution for everyone, and some might want to live with their families.

Questions from the Committee:
Saundra Cole asked that for the zombie subdivisions (land that was subdivided
prior to the ordinance adoption but the units were not constructed, largely due to
the economic recession) if they also must be 15 acres or more. Mr. Earl replied
affirmatively, and that there are not too many of them left in Phoenix.

Sandra Oviedo asked why this is not an option for parcels less than 15 acres, if
this would only be for big time developers, if there will be disability
accommodations in the suites, and expressed a desire to remove the acreage
requirement. Mr. Earl replied that the applicability for parcels less than 15 acres
is something that could be looked into in the future, with a large subdivision the
developer can create floorplans with this product type that create a residential
character, allowing existing homes to add interior suites with cooking facilities is
a different conversation that would need to go through the public process, this
amendment is for any builder, that the 15-acre minimum requirement is already a
requirement, they are not adding it with the amendment, and that he does not
have the specific construction details as it pertains to disability accommodations.

Ken DuBose asked if Lennar has a current project with this product type under
construction. Mr. Earl replied that yes, they have the Next Gen homes (with
interior suites with cooking facilities) being actively developed in Chandler,
Gilbert, near the Estrella Mountains, and in other parts of the West Valley.

Chair Gene Derie reiterated that this request is to update the map in the
Ordinance to allow interior suites with accessory cooking facilities in North
Mountain, South Mountain and Maryvale, and that this request is not to update
any of the requirements for these developments.

Public Comment:
None.

Committee Discussion:
Sandra Oviedo shared that she is in favor of removing the 15 acre minimum as
a requirement for developments with interior suites with accessory cooking
facilities.

Motion:
Mike Weber motioned to recommend approval of Z-TA-4-21 per the staff
recommendation. Chris Demarest seconded the motion.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 306
Vote:
10-0, Motion to approve passed, with Committee Members Barba, Battle, Cole,
Demarest, DuBose, O’Toole, Oviedo, Valenzuela, Weber, and Derie in favor.


STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 307
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-4-21


Date of VPC Meeting January 19, 2022
Request Amend Chapter 6, Section 608.D.8 of the Zoning
Ordinance to expand the applicability of interior suite
with accessory cooking facilities
Recommendation Approve, per staff recommendation
Vote 13-1


VPC DISCUSSION:

No speaker cards were received on this item.

STAFF PRESENTATION
Klimek, staff, presented the staff report which recommends approval of the text
amendment to allow interior suites with accessory cooking facilities in the North
Mountain, South Mountain, and Maryvale Villages. An interior suite with a cooking
facility is a semi-private space under the same roof in a single-family home with
additional amenities such as refrigerators, sinks/disposals, dishwashers, microwaves,
range/oven, washer/dryers, and counter/food prep areas. In 2018, these unit types were
permitted in eight of the Villages subject to the following restrictions and the proposed
amendment would expand these same standards to an additional three villages:

• New subdivisions of 15 acres or more, or previously subdivided and
undeveloped.
• Under the same roof as the home, maximum size of 30% of net floor area of
home or 800 sq. ft. (whichever is less).
• Single meter, mail service and access point
• Design requirements to address building elevation visible from the street to
ensure the single-family neighborhood character is maintained.

The proposed amendment was shared with the three effected villages in November for
information only, is appearing in December to those same villages for recommendation,
and is scheduled for Planning Commission action on January 6th, and City Council
hearing on February 2nd.

APPLICANT PRESENTATION


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 308
Taylor Earl, of Earl and Curley, presented on the request to amend the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance to allow accessory cooking facilities in certain circumstances. A few years
ago, a similar text amendment made interior suites with accessory cooking facilities
permitted in 8 of the 15 villages. This text amendment would allow these new housing
types in North Mountain, Maryvale, and the South Mountain Villages.

The city currently allows the construction of accessory living quarters that do not include
an oven, range, or utility connections that would allow such facilities; the proposed text
amendment would allow for the installation of accessory cooking facilities in residential
applications subject to conditions. The text amendment proposes a series of conditions
including a restriction to allow only in new subdivision greater than 15 acres, to limit the
interior suite to 30 percent of the structure, to require the suite be accessed from the
interior of the structure, and to requirement to prohibit a private yard for the interior
suite. The target market is multigenerational households.

QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE

Alauria stated that multigenerational housing is an important topic and that assessor
suites could even be appropriate in existing neighborhoods because the influx of
dependent seniors will rock the housing market nationally. Earl agreed but explained
that a broader text amendment to consider accessory dwelling units in existing
neighborhoods may encounter different considerations and concerns compared to the
blank slate of new land developments led by respected national builders.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.

STAFF RESPONSE
None.

FLOOR/PUBLIC DISCUSSION CLOSED: MOTION, DISCUSSION, AND VOTE

MOTION:
Adams motioned to approve the request per the staff recommendation.
Sommacampagna seconded the motion.

DISCUSSION:

VOTE: 13-1, motion passes with Adams, Alauria, Barraza, Carrell, Fogelson, Larson,
McBride, O'Connor, O'Hara, Sommacampagna, Veidmark, Vice Chair Jaramillo, and
Chair Krentz in favor; Steinmetz in dissent; and none in abstention.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 309
Attachment E


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
February 3, 2022

ITEM NO: 14
DISTRICT NO.: Citywide
SUBJECT:

Application #: Z-TA-4-21(Continued from 1/6/2022)
Interior Suite with Accessory Cooking Facilities Expansion
Proposal: Amend Chapter 6, Section 608.D.8 of the Zoning Ordinance to expand the
applicability of interior suite with accessory cooking facilities.
Applicant: Taylor C. Earl, Earl & Curley, PC
Representative: Taylor C. Earl, Earl & Curley, PC

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, as shown in Exhibit A of the Staff Report.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
South Mountain 11/9/2021 Information only.
Maryvale 11/10/2021 Information only.
North Mountain 11/17/2021 Information only.
South Mountain 12/14/2021 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 9-1.
Maryvale 1/12/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 10-0.
North Mountain 1/19/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 13-1.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Village Planning Committee
recommendations.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Commissioner Johnson made a MOTION to approve Z-TA-4-21, per the Village
Planning Committee recommendations.

Maker: Johnson
Second: Busching
Vote: 8-0
Absent: None
Opposition Present: No

Findings:

1. The proposed text amendment would expand the accessibility of different housing types
and address a growing demand for multigenerational housing.

2. The proposed provisions for interior suites with accessory cooking facilities are limited to
facilitate orderly development of an interior suite with accessory cooking facilities while
protecting the character of existing single-family neighborhoods.






Page 310
Proposed Language:

Amend Chapter 6, Section 608.D.8.a. (Interior Suite with Accessory Cooking Facilities) to
revised Map 1 as follows:

D. Permitted Uses with Conditions.
***
8. Interior suite with accessory cooking facilities, subject to the following:

a. Dwelling units with an interior suite with accessory cooking facilities are
permitted only in residential subdivisions of 15 acres or more and located
within the boundaries illustrated in Map 1, as follows:

(1) Subdivided after July 5, 2019; or

(2) Subdivided prior to July 5, 2019, but with less than 25 percent of
the lots having constructed dwelling units or valid building permits
as of July 5, 2019.

MAP 1: APPLICABLE AREA






Page 311


Page 312
b. An interior suite with accessory cooking facilities shall only be part of a
single-family detached dwelling unit and must be under the same roof
structure. only one interior suite with accessory cooking facilities shall be
permitted per lot and shall be located on the ground floor.

c. The square footage of the interior suite with accessory cooking facilities
shall not exceed 30 percent of the total net floor area or 800 square feet


Page 313
(whichever is less). Garage or patio areas shall not be included for the
purpose of this calculation.

d. An interior suite with accessory cooking facilities shall not have utility
services that are metered separately from the remainder of the dwelling
unit.

e. At least one internal doorway shall be provided between the interior suite
with accessory cooking facilities and the remainder of the dwelling unit.

f. An interior suite with accessory cooking facilities shall not have a private
yard area that is fenced or walled off from the remainder of the lot. This
requirement shall not prohibit required pool fences, fenced in animal areas,
garden fencing, or other fencing used for different purposes.

g. No more than one parking space, which may be covered or enclosed, shall
be provided for an interior suite with accessory cooking facilities in addition
to the parking provided for the remainder of the dwelling unit, with a
maximum of four spaces total. This requirement does not apply to parking
that may occur on the driveway in front of the garage(s).

h. An interior suite with accessory cooking facilities shall not have a parking
space served by a driveway separated from the main driveway and parking
areas provided for the remainder of the dwelling unit.

i. An interior suite with accessory cooking facilities shall not provide separate
mail service or have a separate address from the remainder of the dwelling
unit.

j. Design requirements. Elevations must minimize any secondary entry
visible from the street and have the appearance of a single-family home.
This shall be treated as a presumption as outlined in Section 507.C.2.

***

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.






Page 314



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Adoption - General Plan Amendment GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8 (South Central TOD
Community Plan) - Area Generally Bounded by Union Pacific Railroad Tracks
(South of Jefferson Street) on the North, 7th Street on the East, South Mountain
Avenue on the South, and 7th Avenue on the West (Resolution 22002)

Request to hold a public hearing on a General Plan Amendment for the following item
to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and the related resolution if
approved. Request to adopt a resolution approving the South Central TOD Community
Plan.

Summary
Application: General Plan Amendment GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8

Owner: Various
Applicant: City of Phoenix
Representative: City of Phoenix

Staff Recommendation: Approval.
VPC Info: The Central City Village Planning Committee heard this case for information
only on March 8, 2021, and the South Mountain Village Planning Committee heard this
case for information only on March 9, 2021.
VPC Action: The Central City Village Planning Committee heard this case on Jan. 10,
2022, and recommended approval, per staff recommendation, by a vote of 13-0.
VPC Action: The South Mountain Village Planning Committee heard this case on Jan.
11, 2022, and recommended approval, per staff recommendation, by a vote of 15-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Feb. 3, 2022, and
recommended approval per the Addendum A Staff Report, by a vote of 8-0.

Location
Area generally bounded by Union Pacific Railroad tracks (south of Jefferson Street)
on the north, 7th Street on the east, South Mountain Avenue on the south, and 7th
Avenue on the west.
Council Districts: 7,8
Parcel Addresses: Multiple parcels within the community led area plan boundaries.


Page 315


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 316
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION




RESOLUTION _____

A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE SOUTH CENTRAL
TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVEOPMENT COMMUNITY PLAN,
APPLICATION GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8.
____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. That the South Central Transit Oriented Development Community

Plan as set forth by Application GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8 and as shown in Exhibit 1 be

approved and adopted.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 2nd day of

March 2022.



MAYOR

ATTEST:


City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:




Page 317
Acting City Attorney


REVIEWED BY:


_______________________ City Manager
PL:amt:____v1 (CM __) (Item _) 4/7/21




Page 318
SOUTH CENTRAL
TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITY PLAN 2022




Page 319
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Adopted by City Council
Kate Gallego, Mayor
Vice Mayor Laura Pastor, District 4

Council Members:
Ann O'Brien, District 1
Jim Waring, District 2
Debra Stark, District 3
Betty Guardado, District 5
Sal DiCiccio, District 6
Yassimin Ansari, District 7
The work that provided the basis for this publication was supported by funding under an Carlos Garcia, District 8
award with the U.S. Federal Transit Administration (FTA). The substance and findings of the
work are dedicated to the public. The author and publisher are solely responsible for the Prepared by:
accuracy of the statements and interpretations in this publication. Such interpretation do not City of Phoenix, Planning and Development Department
necessarily reflect the views of the Government.
Page 320 City Manager’s Office Staff
Jeff Barton, City Manager
Lori Bays, Assistant City Manager
Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
Gina Montes, Deputy City Manager
Mario Paniagua, Deputy City Manager
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Karen Peters, Deputy City Manager
LADDER STEP PROGRAM Ginger Spencer, Deputy City Manager
The U.S. Department of Transportation identified Phoenix – specifically its South Central Markus Coleman, Light Rail Administrator
Light Rail Corridor project – as one of seven cities selected for the agency’s Ladders of Winsome Benjamin, TOD Grant Manager
Opportunity Transportation Empowerment Pilot (LadderSTEP) program. The aim of the Planning and Development Department
program is to promote neighborhood revitalization by investing in transportation infrastructure Alan Stephenson, Deputy City Manager/Director
to connect under-served communities with employment centers. The LadderSTEP program Joshua Bednarek, Deputy Planning Director
reflects a broader shift in thinking about the intersection of transportation projects, economic Samantha Keating, Principal Planner
opportunity, and the people whose lives will be most affected. Sarah Stockham, Central City Village Planner,
Enrique Bojórquez-Gaxiola, South Mountain Village Planner

TOD Planning Project Leads
Joél Carrasco, TOD Planner III
Elias Valencia, TOD Planner II
Vania Fletcher, Planner I

ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Community and Economic Development Parks and Recreation Department
Christine Mackay, Community and Economic Development Director Cynthia Aguilar, Director
Xandon Keating, Deputy Community Development Director Tracee K. Hall, Assistant Director
Jeff Stapleton, Program Manager Joe Diaz, Deputy Director - South Division
Jarod Rogers, Deputy Director - Natural Resources Division
Housing Department Aaron Jensen, Landscape Architect II
Titus Mathew, Housing Director Natasha Hughes, Planner I
Aubrey Gonzalez, Assistant Housing Director
Joseph MacEwan, Housing Manager Public Transit Department
Elenia Sotelo, Housing Manager Jesus Sapien, Public Transit Director
Joe Bowar, Deputy Director Facilities Division
Neighborhood Services Department Herb Munoz, Transit Superintendent TOD Grant Team Partners South Central Collaborative
Spencer Self, Neighborhood Services Director Kevin Teng, Principal Planner TOD Grant Team Leads: Board
Kimberly Dickerson, Deputy Director - Neighborhood Revitalization Petra Falcon, Promise Arizona Shannon Scutari - President
Lynda Y Lee, Deputy Director - Neighborhood Engagement Street Transportation Department Krista Shepherd, Gould Evans Pastor Jeffrey Walker - Vice President
Carla M Kahn, Management Assistant II Kini Knudson, Street Transportation Director Francisca Montoya - Secretary
Page 321 Thaddis Jackson, Management Assistant II Briiana Velez, Assistant Street Transportation Director Promise Arizona: Community Engagement Victor Vidales - Treasurer
Gregory Gonzales, Economic Development Program Manager Mark Glock, Deputy Director - Programming and Project Delivery Gould Evans: Planning and Design Krista Shepherd - Member
Lisa Huggins-Hubbard, Economic Development Program Manager Matthew Wilson, Deputy Director - Traffic Services Local First AZ/Fuerza Local: Business Assistance Tom Kelly - Member
Roberto Frietz, Neighborhood Specialist (Former) Eric Froberg, City Engineer Hustle PHX: Business Assistance
Alma Lara, Neighborhood Specialist Leticia Vargas, Special Projects Administrator Friendly House: Business Assistance Advisory Board
Jesse Garcia, Housing Development Manager Mailén Pankiewicz, Pedestrian Safety Coordinator Center for Neighborhood Technology: TOD Expertise Jessica Bueno
Brian Fellows, Principal Planner Wilson & Company: Civil Engineering for TOD Javier Espinoza
Office of Environmental Programs Marielle Brown, Active Transportation Program Manager J2 Engineering & Environmental Design: Landscape Design Petra Falcon
Nancy S. Allen, Environmental Programs Administrator Sam Gomez
Rosanne Albright, Environmental Programs Coordinator Water Services Department Jordan Jacques
Tricia Balluff, Environmental Programs Coordinator Troy Hayes, Director Gabriel Jaramillo
Jim Swanson, Assistant Director Eva Olivas
Office of Arts and Culture Jennifer Calles, Deputy Director - Environmental Services Division Star Reyes
Mitch Menchaca, Office of Arts and Culture Director Linda Palumbo, Environmental Programs Coordinator Princess Crump
Barry S. Sparkman, Senior Public Art Program Manager Jose Vaquera
Kathryn S Ballares, Public Art Project Manager Office of Heat Response and Mitigation
Catina E. Crum, Public Art Project Manager Dr. David M. Hondula, Director

“In loving memory of Amineh Warrayat, an irreplaceable member of the TOD grant
team. Without her, this plan could have never come to fruition.”




iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS v
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




ACKNOWLEDGMENTS RESOLUTION FROM CITY COUNCIL

South Central Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Steering Committee

Eva Olivas, Chair
Tamala Daniels, Vice Chair
Greg Brownell
Isabel Chavez
Christopher Colyer
Patricia Duarte
Guadalupe Estrada
Valentina Hernandez
Levi Jones
Joseph Larios
Shawn Pearson
Armando Ruiz
Page 322
Shelly Smith
Julian Sodari

The Late Mr. Perry Ealim
The Late Mr. Lyle Plocher



Thanks to the following for donating Steering Committee Meeting accommodations
throughout the project:
South Mountain Community Center
Emmett McLoughlin Community Training and Education Center




vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CITY OF PHOENIX ADOPTED RESOLUTION vii
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




SOUTH CENTRAL ETOD PLANNING SOUTH CENTRAL CORRIDOR CONTEXT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 2016 the City of Phoenix was awarded a federal grant to engage the community and support The South Central Corridor community is the newest addition to
local businesses along the South Central Avenue planned light rail extension. The product of this Phoenix’s Transit Oriented Communities and is generally bound by
grant exercise will be a living document, inspired by the hearts and voices of the community. The the Union Pacific Railroad on the north, South Mountain Avenue on
project has two major activity areas which are further divided into several key tasks and subtasks. the south, 7th Avenue on the west, and 7th Street on the east.
The two major activity areas are TOD Planning and Business Assistance. The City of Phoenix in
collaboration with project partners, community stakeholders, and the Mayor and Council appointed
South Central TOD Steering Committee developed this TOD policy plan specific to the South Central
corridor. This plan will serve to attract, guide, and prioritize strategic investments in infrastructure,
housing, economic development, and other areas to realize a shared community vision for the future
of the corridor.

PLANNING PROCESS/FRAMEWORK
The Planning process framework was first established in 2011as part of a $2.9 million HUD
Page 323
Sustainable Communities Challenge Grant to develop a framework and five community-driven
policy plans for the first Transit Oriented Communities in the City of Phoenix at that time. That
project/initiative became known as ReinventPHX and continues to provide policy support for all
subsequent TOD planning efforts. Three key components of the planning framework remain and
provide a strong organizational foundation for planning with new and upcoming Transit Oriented
Communities. This plan is organized to reveal these as follows:

PART 1: INTRODUCTION (ABOUT THE PLAN)
PART 2: WHO WE ARE TODAY (CURRENT STATE ASSESSMENT)
PART 3: WHAT WE WANT (VISION FOR THE FUTURE)
PART 4: HOW WE GET THERE (IMPLEMENTATION)
STEERING COMMITTEE POLICY PLAN
POLICY PLAN REVIEW + REVIEW +
WHO WE ARE TODAY WHAT WE WANT HOW WE GET THERE APPROVAL APPROVAL
CURRENT STATE ASSESSMENT VISION FOR THE FUTURE IMPLEMENTATION DRAFT POLICY PLAN FINAL PLAN

COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH/ENGAGEMENT/INPUT
PEORIA AVE
Northwest 1/4 mile radius 1/4 mile radius 1/4 mile radius
(5 minute walk) (5 minute walk) (5 minute walk)
Extension
1/2 mile radius 1/2 mile radius 1/2 mile radius
Phase II (10 minute walk) (10 minute walk) (10 minute walk)
OUTREACH WHO WE ARE TODAY WHAT WE WANT TO BE HOW WEDUNLAP
GETAVE
THERE !
! Existing Light Planned-Under Planned Light
• Stakeholder list • Existing Conditions • Priority Areas • Analysis and feasibility of Rail Construction Rail
Light Rail
• Outreach summary Report • Vision Statement(s) implementation tools !
! Existing Station Planned Station
Planned-Under
NORTHERN Construction
• Event Photos • Existing Conditions maps • Illustrative plans • Strategies for AVE
Implementation !
! Station
• Summary of themes and data • Potential Building and • Action Plans
• Priority Areas • Asset Map Housing typologies 19North Transit Overlay District
(TOD-1)
GLENDALE AVE
!
! Transit Overlay District
(TOD-2)

17 Transit Oriented
viii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BETHANY HOME RD
§
¦
¨ £
¤
51 Development (TOD) CORRIDOR CONTEXT ix
District Boundaries

!
! Phoenix City Limits
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




HOW TO USE THIS PLAN WHAT THIS PLAN DOES
PLAN NAVIGATION POLICY PLANS PROVIDE GUIDANCE
Critical to the success of any plan is its usefulness. One major objective from the start of the South The South Central Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Community Plan is a guide for transforming
Central TOD Planning project was the need to ensure the plan is a living, useful, and accessible the South Central Corridor communities into walkable transit oriented communities.
tool for the community, stakeholders, and development professionals at all levels. With this in
mind, the plan provides a digital navigation bar at the top of each page for ease of navigation, THIS PLAN DOES:
understanding, and overall usefulness. The below section summaries are to guide the users in • Provide City-Wide policy guidance to encourage transitioning the existing conditions to a
navigating the plan as a tool to implement positive change for existing and future residents. more equitable, healthier, economically resilient, and sustainable transit oriented and walkable
environment through multi-disciplinary collaboration with internal and external partners.
PART 1: INTRODUCTION (ABOUT THE PLAN) • Lay a foundation for future land use and development to rezone to the Walkable Urban Code.
This section highlights the historical context in which the corridor has taken shape, and reveals • Lay a foundation for future transportation and infrastructure investment to prioritize people
the evolving framework for which the planning process followed. By embracing the corridor’s walking, biking, and using transit.
history and acknowledging past inequities we have a plan that looks to bridge historical divides • Provide support for future grant/funding opportunities towards achieving the community vision.
and build on the community’s strengths. • Provide guidance and support for public and private investments to ensure community benefits
are prioritized in alignment with the community’s vision for the future.
Page 324
PART 2: WHO WE ARE TODAY (CURRENT STATE ASSESSMENT) • Provide a tool for all partners to be held accountable as vision advisors through advocating and
This section synthesizes and summarizes a data-driven assessment through the lens of six (6) participating in a diverse array of implementation actions to achieve the community vision.
planning elements and reveals several best practice investments. It also provides a summary of
the robust public participation efforts, community outreach methods, and listening and learning THIS PLAN DOES NOT:
with resident and stakeholders to understand the corridor needs through people and data. • Rezone any property, business, or residence.
• Purchase any property, business, or residence.
PART 3: WHAT WE WANT (VISION FOR THE FUTURE) • Impose any regulatory standards that aren’t already applicable.
This section describes and illustrates a shared community vision for the year 2045 with the use of
vision narratives and conceptual illustrative plans. Additional maps are provided that showcase
resident identified areas to protect, enhance, and investment. Lastly, community prioritized
investments are mapped and organized by the six (6) planning elements.

PART 4: HOW WE GET THERE (IMPLEMENTATION)
This section contains a preliminary Form-Based Code Character Areas assessment, and
organizes corridor-wide outcomes, strategies, and actions through the six (6) planning elements;
aimed at making progress towards creative, collaborative, and interdisciplinary solutions to help
transition the current state towards achieving the shared community vision.




x HOW TO USE THIS PLAN WHAT THIS PLAN DOES xi
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART 1 02 PART 2 22
INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE
(ABOUT THE PLAN) (CURRENT STATE ASSESSMENT)
ABOUT SOUTH CENTRAL CORRIDOR.......... 04 ASSETS/POINTS OF PRIDE..........................24
Historic Factors........................................................... 05 Planning elements + Investments.............................. 26
History and Culture.................................................... 06
Equitable TOD (ETOD).............................................. 10 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION...............................52
TOD Grant Team Overview......................................54
AN EVOLVING FRAMEWORK......................12 Steering Committee...................................................94
Planning Process: 3 Key Steps.................................. 14
A South Central Approach....................................... 16




Page 325
PART 3 98 PART 4 170
WHAT WE WANT HOW WE GET THERE
(VISION FOR THE FUTURE) (IMPLEMENTATION)

CORRIDOR-WIDE VISION........................... 100 CHARACTER AREA ASSESSMENT................ 172
Rejecting Displacement..............................................101 Residential Character Areas..................................... 180
Four Distinct Areas......................................................102 Mixed-Use Character Areas.................................... 190

NORTH AREA ACHIEVING THE VISION............................. 204
Reconnect communities..............................................104 Measurable Outcomes............................................. 206
RIO SALADO AREA Implementation “Strategy Cards”............................ 208
Celebrate natural resources.......................................120
FROM STRATEGIES TO ACTION................... 212
SOUTH AREA How to take action now............................................ 214
Strengthen traditions and culture...............................136 Strategy-Specific Action Items................................. 216
Government Action Guide....................................... 228
SOUTH MOUNTAIN AREA Community Action Guide......................................... 230
Health and Recreation Hub.......................................154 Business Action Guide.............................................. 232

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES........................... 234




xii RESOLUTION TABLE OF CONTENTS 01
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




PART 1 INTRODUCTION



This plan articulates the
community’s vision for the future
based on current conditions
and aspirations to become one
of Phoenix’s leading Transit
Oriented Communities. The plan
Page 326 also identifies paths forward
through community investments,
partnerships, and implementation
strategies.



“ We must acknowledge history, and not repeat it.

VICE CHAIRWOMAN TAMALA DANIELS
South Central TOD Steering Committee 2018-2021




George Washington Carver Museum
Source: Phil Soto, South Central TOD Grant Team

02 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 03
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




HISTORIC
ABOUT THE SOUTH FACTORS
CENTRAL CORRIDOR Communities across the nation these historic factors in their These topics have been intrinsic
have focused discussions own communities, with some in empowering residents and
around several historic factors being documented more community members towards
SOUTH The South Central Corridor is uniquely situated between two regional such as redlining, exclusionary recently through various more equitable outcomes,
destinations, Downtown Phoenix to the north, and South Mountain Preserve zoning, racist restrictive research, community and goals, and investments that
CENTRAL to the South. It is also bisected by the Rio Salado, a major waterway that covenants, and discriminatory city driven efforts. South benefit existing residents first.
CORRIDOR gives life and nurtures an ecologically diverse urban oasis in the heart of lending practices that have Phoenix living conditions Despite these challenges
the greater Phoenix Metropolitan area. This unique geographic position in combination with a created a health, wealth and have suffered through land and history, South Phoenix
major public investment to serve the community through the South Central Avenue planned light housing gap disproportionately use industrialization, poor has proven resilient, and
rail extension has positioned the South Central Corridor Communities for a unique opportunity to impacting communities of color. housing conditions, lack of seeks creative, collaborative,
engage in robust collaboration, visioning, and capacity building towards achieving a community- The South Central Corridor infrastructure investments, and authentic ways towards
based vision for a more equitable, sustainable, healthier, and prosperous future for everyone. communities are no exception and lack of access to health improving the quality of life for
Page 327 and have acknowledged resources and opportunities. everyone.




View of Downtown Phoenix | South Central Avenue View of South Mountain | South Central Avenue
Source: Phil Soto, South Central TOD Grant Team Source: Phil Soto, South Central TOD Grant Team



04 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 05
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



SOUTH The South Central Corridor history begins barely one year after Jack Swilling’s
SOUTH CENTRAL CORRIDOR MEMORIAS - arrival. The Columbus H. Gray family arrived from Union County, Arkansas
CENTRAL in 1868, and settled at 7th Avenue and Mohave, a 160-acre homestead
HISTORY AND CULTURE HISTORY encompassing Central Avenue to 7th Avenue and Buckeye Road to Durango
Introduction Road. With the family arrived Mary Green, a free slave and the first free African American woman
From about A.D. to arrive in Phoenix with her two children.
1 to 1450, the
Hohokam inhabited Columbus Gray also filed for an additional 80 acres under Mary Green’s name which was issued
numerous large on 10/20/1891. In 1888, Mary was the first to purchase property in what is now Tempe, - a 160
villages throughout acre homestead where she built a modest brick home. Mary would return to Phoenix in 1900, but
the Salt and Gila some of her family would remain in Tempe.
River valleys.
The Hohokam While many African American families would eventually settle in Eastlake and west of the corridor,
engineered highly Hispanic families have always been an integral part of the history of Phoenix and the South
sophisticated Central Corridor. By 1868, ‘Mexican workers proved vital in early irrigation work. They worked on
canal system that constructing the canals and served as the zanjeros (ditch overseers). They also were farmworkers.
carried water over Mexicans constructed many of the adobe buildings in the city and did other kinds of maintenance or
hundreds of miles, construction work in the city. A few Mexican entrepreneurs established businesses.’ (5)
turning the desert
Page 328 into fertile, irrigated Most Mexican families in
farmland. Omar A. the late 1800s settled south
Turney, one of the first to map the historic canals in the Salt River Valley, stated that the Hohokam of the railroad, in the areas
had developed the largest single body of land irrigated in prehistoric times in North America(1). of Grant and Central Parks
The longest recorded canal extended close to 20 miles or more, beginning at Pueblo Grande and to Buckeye Road, along
reaching as far west as present day Glendale(2). with African-American and
Asian immigrants, in the
The Hohokam, ancestors to the present day O’Odham (also known as Pima), vacated their irrigation few areas the poor could
systems by the middle of the 15th century, leaving behind, throughout the valley, ‘villages containing afford to live, without many
platform mounds, elliptical ballcourts and trash mounds covered with broken ceramic pots and other amenities. They also worked in
artifacts.’(3) One of those villages, Pueblo Viejo, was located in the South Central Corridor. warehouses, slaughterhouses
For the next 400 years, the Salt River Valley remained mostly abandoned. and processing plants that
surrounded the areas near
In 1865 John Y.T. Smith arrives in the valley with a contract to deliver hay to Ft. McDowell, settling in the railroad. While Mexicans
the valley’s east side, where he built the first house in the valley as a hay ranch. comprised half of the
population in 1877 and 45%
Pioneer Jack Swilling, and soon to be the founder of Phoenix, arrives in the valley during the fall in 1880, the influx of Anglo
of the same year, and stops at Smith’s ranch. In front of him, stretching endlessly, he encounters the American settlers via railroad
historic Hohokam canals crisscrossing the valley floor. An idea is formed, ‘It seemed an easy task was profound, and by the
to throw these waters over the fertile desert, which was all that was necessary to make this desert year 1900, the percentage
Coumbus Gray and Mary Green Homesteads
valley blossom as a rose’ (4). And the rest is history. of Hispanic residents had
Source: Bureau of Land Management
dropped to 14%.
06 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 07
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSFORMATIONAL EVENTS SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSFORMATIONAL EVENTS
Rio Salado Flooding, World’s longest bridge, Race Restrictions Father Emmett McLoughlin, The People’s Padre
The cycle of dramatic floods in the late 1800’s up to 1910, resulted in an all-out effort, if not close to Father Emmett, a newly ordained Catholic priest arrives in Phoenix in 1934. The Franciscan Order
a brawl between two cities, to get a bridge over the Rio Salado. While Tempe had the shortest span staffed St. Mary’s Church which served South Phoenix, and as its newest member, Father Emmett
and better bed rock, Phoenix had Dwight B. Heard, his 7,000 acres of agricultural land south of the got the assignments no one wanted. In his autobiography, People’s Padre, he described the south
river and his political experience with the Roosevelt Dam, so Phoenix gets the Center Street (now side of Phoenix as an area of mostly cardboard and wooden crate shacks without plumbing or
Central Avenue) Bridge. Dedicated in 1911, it was considered the world’s longest bridge under the electricity and he believed this was one of the reasons Arizona had the highest rate of infant and
category of “reinforced concrete” at the time. Prior to the bridge, the areas south of the Salado were maternal mortality rate at that time. So, he enters a contest, wins $600 which he uses to renovate
only agricultural and laborers working in south Phoenix had to travel over the Salado on a dirt track an abandoned grocery into a community center and social hall for African Americans, and another
on Center Street on foot or in horse-drawn carriages. building as a free maternity clinic. He recruited volunteer doctors and nurses and offered family
planning – to all - regardless of color or race. In 1939, Father Emmett is appointed Chaplain
By the 1920s, race-restrictions against African of the Arizona House of Representatives and through his strength and commitment to affordable
Americans, Mexicans and Asians began to appear as housing, he was the force in applying for federal funds for Matthew Henson and Marcos de Niza
part of city housing covenants. Along with restrictive real public housing projects. He secured funds to build St. Monica’s Hospital (now Phoenix Memorial
state and lending practices there was almost a complete Hospital) and with the help of the community, the hospital was completed in 1944 along with St.
restriction on the ability of minorities to get a loan or Monica’s School of Nursing, the first, west of the Mississippi River, to be a ‘non-sectarian
to purchase property north of Van Buren Street, which and inter-racial’ accredited facility. Father Emmett also convinced Eleanor Roosevelt to visit
Page 329 became the ‘de facto’ boundary for minorities. the hospital, which she did on March 22, 1947. Mrs. Roosevelt noted how interested she was in the
The South Central Corridor spans over 5 miles in length, school, pointing that racial discrimination was completely eliminated and that the hospital had a
from Grant and Central Parks to Dobbins Road and 7th Godinez home wonderful atmosphere. (6) In its 12 years, the school graduated 145 nurses. (7)
Avenue to 7th Street, making this corridor unique in the 1018 S. 5th Avenue
multitude of culturally diverse neighborhoods. Academic History of Grant Park Neighborhood Bibliography
1. Turney, Omar A., Dr. Map of Prehistoric Irrigation Canals,
studies and historic surveys such as those produced Once World War II ended and servicemen returned to their 1929.
2. Andrews, John P. and Bostwick, Todd W. Desert Farmers
by the City of Phoenix, families, things slowly began to change. Initially, many in at the River’s Edge. The Hohokam and Pueblo Grande.
Pueblo Grande Museum and Archaeological Park.
provide an in-depth view
“ Anglo Phoenix society expected pre-war social conditions to 3. Howard, Jerry B. Hohokam Legacy: Desert Canals.
of the historical African- (Pueblo Grande Museum Profiles No. 12) www.
American, Asian, and continue. David Perez, a member of the famed Bushmasters of waterhistory.com
World War II and a future police officer with the City of Phoenix, 4. Farish, Thomas E., Arizona Historian. History of Arizona,
Mexican experience, and Volume VI, Chapter IV. Phoenix, Arizona, 1918.
of the southern areas of attempted to use his G.I. Bill rights to finance a home for his 5. Jean Reynolds, Public Historian for the Phoenix Historic
Preservation Office. The Architectural and Social History
Phoenix - much greater family. He was, however, prevented by the dual problem of not of Grant Park and Central Park Neighborhoods: A
area than this corridor. Preliminary Survey. May 28, 1998
being able to purchase north of Van Buren Street and the reality 6. Eleanor Roosevelt, “My Day, march 22, 1947,” The
This introduction offers a that banks redlined, and refused home loans in the area south of Eleanor Roosevelt Papers Digital Edition (2017),
accessed 5/18/2021, https://www2.gwu.
small glimpse of a couple edu/~erpapers/myday/displaydoc.cfm?_y=1947&_
Van Buren Street.
of people and events that f=md000606.
7. Arizona Nurses Association. White Caps in the Desert.
embodies the strength and POST WWII AND THE AMERICAN LEGION
“ https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.aznurse.org/resource/
resilience of the South THUNDERBIRD POST 41 resmgr/Docs/White%20Caps%20in%20The%20
Desertreduced.pdf
Central Corridor and its [entering Post 41 fight for housing equality] 8. Hispanic Historic Property Survey, City of Phoenix
people. (Historic context, pg. 73)


08 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 09
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



SOUTH The South Central
Communities have
CENTRAL voiced strongly and
ETOD consistently the need
to correct the long standing and historic
Pedestrians Crossing | 5200 S. Central Avenue disinvestment in their communities,
Source: Phil Soto, South Central TOD Grant Team while simultaneously acknowledging
that the wrong type, speed, or intensity
of investment could trigger higher
displacement risk as a result of expedited
EQUITABLE TRANSIT ORIENTED gentrification. On one hand “investment”
DEVELOPMENT (ETOD) is critical to correct the inequities of the
past, and on the other hand the wrong
type of “investment” may be harmful
What is ETOD? purposes, Equitable Transit that greater progress in and exacerbate challenges for existing
In 2013 the City of Phoenix Oriented Development (ETOD) equitable engagement and residents.
adopted the TOD Strategic communities, enhance the community planning are
Policy framework (amended quality of life for everyone. still needed. The intent is To remedy this, several community driven
2016 and 2018) which includes More recent conversations not to celebrate this plan as conversations have revolved around
“equity” as one of the five locally, in particular as part being solely representative the need to provide more opportunities,
Page 330
interrelated and interdependent of this planning process, and of a model equitable TOD support, and resources for community
factors meant to permeate nationally as part of other policy plan, process, or wealth building. In particular, individual
planning and decision making similar community revitalization outcomes; it is intended to and community wealth building
processes to help ensure and planning efforts have make visible these disparities, through property and land ownership,
sustainability in planning consistently revealed several barriers, and challenges to entrepreneurship, and community
for our Transit Oriented historic, institutional, and encourage ongoing efforts, leadership. This approach is critical to
Communities in Phoenix. Equity systemic factors as barriers collaboration, and partnerships empowering the community towards
is described to ensure people to achieving truly equitable for more equitable outcomes achieving “gentle-fication”, a slower,
of all ages, income levels, outcomes even with the best of in south central and other targeted investment approach towards
races, ethnicities and abilities intentions. Phoenix communities. It is community revitalization while reducing
have fair access to the benefits also to acknowledge the the risk of displacement.
provided by community An honest approach to community desire for equitable
investment in light rail. It is ETOD in South Central investments, while being fully The South Central Equitable TOD vision,
also noted that often times the Although this document is not transparent that there is a need outcomes, investments, strategies, and
cost of living, health impacts, titled an “Equitable TOD” to continue learning, exploring, actions in this document are intended to
and urban development policy plan, a lot of great and evolving our processes make progress, provide tools, and break
disproportionately affect work has contributed to more and approach towards resilient, barriers to allow South Central residents
middle and lower income equitable, authentic, and inclusive, sustainable, and more opportunities in building long term
families, where as Equitable inclusionary outcomes, it is equitable communities. Pool Repair Pool man| 3242 S. Central Ave.
individual and community wealth. Source: Phil Soto, TOD Grant Team
communities and for our important to acknowledge

10 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 11
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES


SUSTAINABILITY FRAMEWORK
AN EVOLVING Quality of life for the
present and future.

Equity Prosperity Resiliency Diversity Authenticity
FRAMEWORK
Phoenix Transit Oriented The five (5) TOD Districts are: 1) the Gateway
Development (TOD) District; 2) the Eastlake Garfield District; 3) the TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) SUSTAINABILITY FRAMEWORK
In 2008, the largest light rail construction Midtown District; 4) the Uptown District; and The TOD planning effort for the South Central Corridor communities has built upon the lessons
project in the nation’s history was completed in 5) the Solano District. Soon after, in 2016, the learned through the ReinventPHX TOD Strategic Policy Framework and six subsequently
Phoenix. This major achievement was the result Northwest Extension Phase I was completed approved TOD District Policy Plans. The project team allowed stakeholders’ perspectives to
of a partnership between local and federal and shortly after, the city began a 2-3 year inform a unique approach to generate a 30-year vision relative to the six planning elements
agencies, strong civic leadership, and visionary process working with the community to develop (below) and five factors towards sustainability (above).
urban planning that began decades earlier. a sixth TOD Policy Plan, titled 19North, using the
The infrastructure, however, was designed to ReinventPHX TOD Strategic Policy Framework as The Land Use Element focuses on the The Health Element focuses on key
not just add high quality transportation options, a guide. The Phoenix City Council adopted the spatial pattern of urban development, aspects of the built environment that impact
but to lay a foundation for “reinventing” the 19North Policy Plan on April 7, 2021. including intensity, design, building form, public health, the availability of healthy
communities surrounding it and creating new and unique place-making characteristics. food, recreational amenities, and safe
Land Use Health places to walk and bicycle.
urban living choices in a city planned almost TOD Strategic Policy Framework
entirely for the automobile. Since it’s adoption in 2013, the City of Phoenix
Page 331 TOD Strategic Policy Framework has been The Mobility Element focuses on the
The Housing Element focuses on the
In 2011, the City of Phoenix was awarded a utilized successfully to provide a holistic and movement of people and goods, including
affordability, quality and diversity of
$2.9 million Sustainable Communities Challenge multidisciplinary engagement, visioning, and the availability of quality multi-modal
residential living options.
Grant from the U.S. Department of Housing implementation plan framework for several transportation options.
Housing Mobility
and Urban Development (HUD). Thus, a diverse transit oriented communities in Phoenix.
collaborative partnership and initiative between
The Economic Development Element
the City of Phoenix, the U.S. Department This framework has evolved over the years The Green Systems Element focuses on
focuses on the financial prosperity of
of Housing and Urban Development, and to respond to various community needs yet the design of buildings and infrastructure to
businesses and residents, including the
numerous other organizations was born. This maintains its foundational structure inclusive of improve resource efficiency and
access to jobs, training and educational
partnership came to be known as “ReinventPHX” five (5) interrelated and interdependent environmental protection.
Economic
opportunities. Green
and aimed to create a new urban development factors (Equity, Diversity, Authenticity, Development Systems
model in Phoenix to achieve Walkable Resiliency, and Prosperity) to permeate
Communities. ReinventPHX resulted in the planning and decision making processes to
creation of a TOD Strategic Policy Framework help ensure sustainability.
followed by five District Policy Plans to It is important to recognize that these six planning elements are intrinsically
illustrate the community vision and align it with Additionally, the framework maintains the six interconnected to one another and changes in the defining factors of one element
development strategies and actions for the (6) planning elements structure (Housing,
are likely to have impacts that affect the conditions of other elements. Active
communities situated along the first phase of the Economic Development, Land Use, Mobility,
light rail. Health, Green Systems) to ensure a multi- engagement of South Central Corridor communities allowed for the creation of a
disciplinary process. plan that is responsive to the specific needs and desires of their community.


12 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 13
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




PLANNING PROCESS: STEP 1: WHO WE ARE
CURRENT STATE ASSESSMENT
3 KEY STEPS 6 PLANNING

ELEMENTS Land Use Housing Economic Health Mobility Green
OVERVIEW Development Systems
The planning process was structured in three steps, Who We Are (Current State Assessment), What
We Want To Be (Vision for the Future) and How We Get There (Implementation). Community CENTER FOR
engagement and capacity building was integrated into each step. The Who We Are step entailed 2019 CURRENT BUSINESS + NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERING BEST PRACTICE
CONDITIONS RESIDENT TECHNOLOGY MEETINGS COMMUNITY
a data-driven analysis of the current conditions within the Corridor using information derived from REPORT SURVEYS (CNT) BRIEFING INVESTMENTS
resident workshops and existing plans and databases. The What We Want To Be step included PAPERS
surveys, workshops, and focus group discussions that facilitated community conversations that
helped describe a desirable future using narratives and illustrations. Lastly, the How We Get There
step, best-practice implementation strategies, policies and area specific actions were identified to
build upon the Corridor assets, reduce liabilities, and catalyze progress towards the Vision. STEP 2: WHAT WE WANT
VISION FOR THE FUTURE
STEP 1: Who We Are (Current State Assessment)
6 PLANNING
Residents and other Corridor stakeholders participated in surveys, bilingual workshops, and field
surveys designed to identify and map assets, community needs, and improvement opportunities. ELEMENTS Land Use Housing Economic Health Mobility Green
Page 332
Development Systems
CONSTANT COMMUNITY
This input was then synthesized with secondary data, such as demographic, land use, crime, traffic
injuries, and economic conditions, etc. and analyzed using Geographic Information Systems (GIS),
VISION
statistical software, and other data to complete an assessment of the existing conditions. COMMUNITY
STATEMENTS + COMMUNITY COMMUNITY
IDENTIFIED +
ILLUSTRATIVE PRIORITIZED SITES GOALS +
PRIORITIZED
MASTER PLAN AND CORRIDORS EMERGING THEMES
INVESTMENTS
STEP 2: What We Want (Vision for the Future) ENGAGEMENT + CAPACITY BUILDING
A series of public participation events that began with broad themes and progressed to specific
designs were held to inform the creation of a shared long-term vision. Two week-long community
workshops were conducted in large presentation formats as well as small round-table conversations
that facilitated a two-way exchange of knowledge between residents and the project team. Input STEP 3: HOW WE GET THERE
was then compiled, analyzed, and presented back to stakeholders in an iterative feedback process. IMPLEMENTATION

STEP 3: How We Get There (Implementation) 6 PLANNING

The How We Get There phase included small discussions and large capacity-building forums with ELEMENTS Land Use Housing Economic Health Mobility Green
Development Systems
urban development professionals, various city department staff, and community stakeholders.
Evidence-based best practices were identified to respond to the unique conditions in the Corridor
and help advance the current state towards the vision. Ongoing Engagement with the South Central
TOD Steering Committee refined and prioritized practices that were most appropriate for the MEASURABLE STRATEGY CARDS: PRIORITY AREA
OUTCOMES STRATEGIES + 5-YEAR ACTION
Corridor and helped identify partnerships that could potentially provide implementation resources. POLICIES PLANS



14 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 15
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



A SOUTH CENTRAL TARGETED
CORRIDOR APPROACH ENGAGEMENT

Several historic, contextual, and community driven factors have contributed to a positive shift in
the approach and application of the TOD Strategic Policy Framework to better fit the uniqueness
of the South Central Communities. A heavy emphasis on Equity has resonated with South Central
Communities and stakeholders from the beginning of the planning process and still holds strong.

Success in all aspects of the planning work were not to be measured by aligning the community
to the framework, but rather aligning the framework to the community. In this instance, the South
Central Community expressed countlessly the need to “reject displacement” thereby providing a
heavier “lens” towards the equity component of the TOD Framework. This South Central Corridor
approach utilized the framework to extract unique conditions, goals, and outcomes. This informed a
process that prioritized information and adjusted the work program towards minimizing impacts to
the most vulnerable populations at risk of displacement. The following sections outline several of the
planning work program items that were adjusted to fit the needs of the South Central Communities.

One equity driven outcome that resulted
Page 333
from the emphasis toward Equitable TOD
was to encourage ongoing partnerships
between the City and local non-profit
experts as they continue reaching, listening,
and understanding the voice of populations
on the verge of and experiencing the
impacts of historically systemic racial, social,
and economic inequity.

Comparatively, a targeted engagement
effort was also taken to listen, educate, and
collaborate with the local development
professionals on the needs and opportunities
for Equitable TOD to protect residents at
risk of displacement. This effort, described
further on page 212, complemented the
holistic multidisciplinary approach outlined
in the Framework and set the stage for a
positive evolution in planning for our Transit
Oriented Communities in a more equitable
way.

16 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 17
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



A SOUTH CENTRAL EQUITABLE
CORRIDOR APPROACH INVESTMENT MENU

Every community desires investments that come in many shapes and sizes, with one key feature of Urgent Care HEALTH Workforce and ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Facilities URGENT CARE FACILITIES Education WORKFORCE AND EDUCATION
providing community benefits. From common infrastructure elements such as safe sidewalks, safe
bike lanes, and enhanced transit shelters, to more complex integrated networks of public plazas, An investment An investment
open spaces, or ecological preserves. Investments should be context specific, especially in and option for smaller option to improve
around ETOD communities that perform differently from other automobile dependent parts of a city. scale, medical skills training,
facilities that education, and
DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS: POLICIES & STRATEGIES:
provide timely and Small scale medical facilities, • Additional Neighborhood small business, and Skills training and education
All investments have a unique place and bring unique opportunities. As part of the planning partnered with medical centers Amenities programs that support existing
neighborhood to provide localized, timely local industry businesses and industry.
services.
process, the community is asked to prioritize investments unique to their history, experiences, accessible health support.
and in alignment with making progress towards the community vision for the future. In South services.
Central, yet again, the community has enlightened us with a perspective to bring forward a new
category/“lens” to evaluate investment options.

This has led to the creation and addition of several context specific equitable investment options UC WE
SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU

needed to support populations at risk of displacement. For the complete “Investment Menu”
options please see the resources section.
Page 334




Land Bank/Trust LAND USE Displacement HOUSING First/Last Mile MOBILITY Discounted MOBILITY
LAND BANK / TRUST DISPLACEMENT POLICY ADDRESS FIRST / LAST MILE TRANSPORTATION GAP DISCOUNTED TRANSIT PASSES
Policy Transit Passes
An investment An investment
option to establish An investment option for An investment
an entity that may option for policy infrastructure option for reduced
acquire, hold, support that needs supportive costs and
develop, and incentivizes of safe, healthy, discounted transit
POLICIES & STRATEGIES: POLICIES & STRATEGIES: POLICIES & STRATEGIES: POLICIES & STRATEGIES:
dispose of land in Establish a land bank / trust resident and Provide current renters in the and equitable first Address first / last mile passes for Reduced costs annual passes
for the acquisition, holding corridor “rent-to-own” and transportation gap. for corridor residents and
alignment with the and disposition of land for business ownership ownership incentive options to and last mile active residents, workers, employees.
community focused uses and stabilize current residents and
benefits. businesses.
community vision. opportunities. transportation and communities
connections. dependent on
public transit.



LB DP FL DT
SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU
SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU
SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU




18 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 19
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



A SOUTH CENTRAL PROTECT, ENHANCE,
CORRIDOR APPROACH INVEST
Another aspect of the planning work that evolved to fit the needs of the South Central Communities
is the language chosen to describe the community identified “areas of change”. “Areas of change”
are distinct categories showing a level of community support for land use and development
growth. It was important to use language that resonates with the community, residents, and local
stakeholders, especially to distinguish areas in need of protection from displacement. The South
Central Corridor “areas of change” have been labeled as “Protect”, “Enhance”, and “Invest”.

PROTECT
Areas designated for slow incremental growth strategies, smaller scale and lowest intensity
investments. *Housing investments examples: ADU’s, Tiny Homes, manufactured homes, duplexes,
triplexes, fourplexes.
Moderate Medium Medium

w t all
ge Low Hig
Slo Fas Sm Lar h



Page 335
Rate of Change Scale of Change Intensity of Change

ENHANCE
Areas designated for slow to moderate rate of growth strategies, medium scale and medium
intensity investments. *Housing investments examples: Courtyard Apartments, Townhouses medium
multiplex, live-work.

Moderate Medium Medium

w t all
ge Low Hig
Slo Fas Sm Lar h


Rate of Change Scale of Change Intensity of Change


INVEST
Areas designated for moderate rate of growth strategies, medium/large scale and medium/
high intensity investments. *Housing investments examples: Mid-rise apartments/condos, Mixed Use
Residential.
Moderate Medium Medium

w t all
ge h
Slo Fas Sm Lar
Low Hig


Rate of Change Scale of Change Intensity of Change

20 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 21
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




PART 2 WHO WE ARE




A successful community plan
must first listen to and honor the
stories of the communities past
and present before being given
Page 336 the opportunity to grow a future
together.




“ We must protect our most vulnerable.

COUNCILMAN GARCIA
Council District 8

Videographer Documenting Stories
Source: TOD Grant Team


22 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 23
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




Preston Funeral Home
ASSETS + Cesar Chavez Community
School
Pete’s Fish & Chips

El Nuevo Taquito
POINTS OF PRIDE
CURRENT CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT South Phoenix Market
Carnicerias Rancho Grande
BROADWAY
Assets are strengths that Ed Pastor Transit
Center
currently exist, such as
employers, schools, historic
buildings, community Arizona Department of
WASHINGTON Economic Security
Travis L Williams
organizations, initiatives, Family Services Center
JEFFERSON Espiritu Charter School

institutions and infrastructure.
Mary’s Ministries
Chase Field
Asset mapping helps inform ROESER Phoenix Fire Department
Union Station Station 22
the planning process by American Legion Friendly House Home Care
Eduardo Valdez JR Friendly El Tacazo
creating an inventory for Friendly House
House
La Canasta Mexican
LINCOLN
New Garden Sunland Elementary
preserving, improving or Food School
Bentley Gallery ASU Prep Academy PCA
further supporting existing St Pius X Catholic George Washington Carver
Church Museum & Cultural Center Phoenix Police Dept.
South Mountain Precint Ranch Market
resources. Likewise, policies Vista College Galvanize / The Larry
Preparatory - Hadley
Saint Anthony Saint Vincent
to implement a long range De Paul Boys & Girls Clubs of
Emmett McLoughlin Metro Phoenix
Community Training and Roosevelt Elementary
Education Center BUCKEYE Central Park School
vision should be designed Ocotillo Library & SOUTHERN
Phoenix Day Child and Family Workforce Literacy
Page 337 Lowell Elementary Center Center
to harness the advantages School
Valle Del Sol South Plaza
Phoenix Memorial Lo-Lo’s Chicken & Waffles Advance U Elementary
created from a community’s Center Saint Catherine of Siena
Roman Catholic Church Corral Cleaners & Launderers
unique assets. The South Harmon Library South Mountain Community
Chase Bank
Center
Central Corridor communities Saint Catherine of Sienna
Catholic School
have a wealth of amenities, MOHAVE Gino’s Pizza The Sagrado Galleria

destinations, and unique San Juan Bosco
Oasis Raspados
places this plan intends to MARICO
PA FWY Academia Del Pueblo VINEYARD
Comedor Guadalajara
preserve and build upon.

WATKINS
Poncho’s Mexican
Habitat for Humanity Food & Cantina


Azukar Coffee

Mesquite
A Runner’s Track
BASELINE Good Night Pediatrics

Mountain Park Health Center
Champion South Mountain
Nina Mason Pulliam Rio
Salado Audubon Center


NFL YET College Prep Academy


South Pointe Junior High


South Pointe High School




24 WHO WE ARE Preston Funeral Home Cesar Chavez Community
WHO WE ARE 25
School
Pete’s Fish & Chips
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




PLANNING ELEMENTS
+ INVESTMENTS
CURRENT CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT BEST PRACTICE COMMUNITY INVESTMENTS
As part of the initial planning process, and to capture the community voice from various city and After the six planning element assessments were completed as part of the Existing Conditions Report,
community planning efforts along the corridor, an Existing Conditions report was created for the the project team compiled several “Best Practice Community Investment Cards” similarly organized
South Central Corridor project. The Existing Conditions Report provides an in-depth current state into the six planning elements. This “investment menu” became a foundation for facilitating
analysis, background, and demographic overview utilizing the six planning element framework interactive conversations, education, listening, and learning with the community. The following
below. The following pages provide a brief summary of content extracted from each of the six pages also provide examples of several “Best Practice Community Investments” organized by
planning elements, however the complete Existing Conditions report can be found in the resources each of the six planning elements, however the complete “Investments Menu” utilized through this
section. planning process can be found in the resources section.

SUSTAINABILITY FRAMEWORK
Quality of life for the LAND USE
present and future.
Planning
WALKABLE URBAN CENTER Investment
Element Icon
Type
Page 338 Equity Prosperity Resiliency Diversity Authenticity


The Land Use Element focuses on the The Health Element focuses on key Investment
spatial pattern of urban development, aspects of the built environment that impact Image
including intensity, design, building form, public health, the availability of healthy
and unique place-making characteristics. food, recreational amenities, and safe DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS:
Walkable Urban Centers • Increased Access to
Community
Land Use Health places to walk and bicycle. are dense, mixed use areas Careers and Education
where streets and buildings • Enhanced Neighborhood Benefits
are designed to prioritize Authenticity and
Investment pedestrians and bicyclists. Attractiveness
The Mobility Element focuses on the Wide, shaded sidewalks, high • Stronger, Opportunity-Rich
The Housing Element focuses on the Description capacity transit stations, short Local Economy
movement of people and goods, including block sizes, mid-rise housing, • Additional Quality,
affordability, quality and diversity of
the availability of quality multi-modal office buildings, shopping, and Affordable Neighborhood
residential living options. entertainment destinations Choices
transportation options. are typical characteristics of
Housing Mobility Walkable Urban Centers.


The Economic Development Element
The Green Systems Element focuses on WUC
focuses on the financial prosperity of Investment
the design of buildings and infrastructure to
businesses and residents, including the SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU Icon
improve resource efficiency and
access to jobs, training and educational
environmental protection.
Economic
opportunities. Green
Development Systems




26 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 27
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




LAND USE
Current Conditions
THE LAND USE ELEMENT FOCUSES
A Corridor of Stories ON THE SPATIAL PATTERN OF URBAN
From Downtown to South Mountain the corridor radiates DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING INTENSITY,
energy through its blend of cultures and variety of land DESIGN, BUILDING FORM, AND UNIQUE
uses. From single family homes and small businesses, to PLACE-MAKING CHARACTERISTICS.
warehouse buildings and multi-family housing, from the historic
neighborhoods in Central City South to Lolo’s Chicken and
Waffles, Gino’s Pizza, and the car shows at South Plaza the
vibrancy of the South Central corridor is captured in the histories
of its Native, Hispanic, African, and Asian peoples which make
up 84% of the population.

Let’s take a walk
Foundational policies and plans demonstrate that the community
of South Central wish to protect the corridors natural resources
and share prosperity with the legacy of prior generations
Page 339 into the future. The corridor benefits from having an existing
grid pattern which naturally tends to be at a more walkable
scale. There is a strong entrepreneurial spirit in the corridor
with hundreds of local small businesses providing exceptional
services and one-of-a-kind goods, and it will only get stronger
as vacancies lessen over time. Plenty of scenic resources such
as the Rio Salado, Highland and Western Canals, and the
nearby South Mountain Regional Park/Preserve, truly have the
potential to make South Central a walkers paradise.


BY THE NUMBERS
5.10 300 + ACRES
square miles of vacant land



Matthew Henson Apartments
Source: TOD Grant Team


28 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 29
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




LAND USE
Best Practice Community Investments

OVERVIEW
Every community desires investments that come in many forms, shapes, and sizes. All community
investments have a unique place and bring unique opportunities. The following “investment cards”
provided examples of best practice community investments that when combined begin to articulate
community desired changes towards a shared community vision.


LAND USE
Planning
WALKABLE URBAN CENTER Investment
Element Icon
Type

Investment
Image
DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS:
Walkable Urban Centers • Increased Access to
Community
Page 340 are dense, mixed use areas Careers and Education
where streets and buildings • Enhanced Neighborhood Benefits
Investment are designed to prioritize Authenticity and
pedestrians and bicyclists. Attractiveness
Description Wide, shaded sidewalks, high • Stronger, Opportunity-Rich
capacity transit stations, short Local Economy
block sizes, mid-rise housing, • Additional Quality,
office buildings, shopping, and Affordable Neighborhood
entertainment destinations Choices
are typical characteristics of
Walkable Urban Centers.




WUC Investment
SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU
Icon

LAND USE LAND USE LAND USE LAND USE LAND USE
MAIN STREET CORRIDOR WALKABLE URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD WALKABLE SUBURBAN NEIGHBORHOOD URBAN INDUSTRIAL ZONE URBAN CAMPUS




DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS: DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS: DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS: DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS: DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS:
Main Street Corridors are • Increased Access to Walkable Urban Neighborhoods • Enhanced Neighborhood Walkable Suburban • Enhanced Neighborhood Urban Industrial Zones • Increased Access to Urban Campuses are • Increased Access to
streets with significant Careers and Education are dense residential areas Authenticity and Neighborhoods are low to Authenticity and are manufacturing and Careers and Education healthcare and education Careers and Education
pedestrian and bicycle • Enhanced Neighborhood where streets and buildings Attractiveness medium density residential Attractiveness warehousing areas that are • Stronger, Opportunity-Rich facilities that have a high level • Stronger, Opportunity-Rich
enhancements that are Authenticity and are designed to prioritize • Additional Quality, areas where streets and • Additional Quality, highly accessible to multiple Local Economy of pedestrian and bicycle Local Economy
lined with retailers, small Attractiveness pedestrians and bicyclists. Affordable Neighborhood buildings are designed to Affordable Neighborhood modes of transportation, connectivity and contain
businesses and other active • Stronger, Opportunity-Rich Landscape-buffered sidewalks, Choices prioritize pedestrians and Choices including air, railroad, highway integrated residential and
ground floor uses, such as Local Economy small block sizes, low rise bicyclists. Tree lined sidewalks, and public transit. Streets are commercial establishments.
apartment community rooms • Additional Quality, housing, quality transit medium length block sizes, designed to balance efficient High capacity transit stations,
and recreation facilities. Affordable Neighborhood services and small commercial and single family housing maneuvering for large trucks concealed parking areas,
Low rise mixed-use buildings, Choices retail establishments at key with alley-accessed garages with pedestrian and bicycle student housing, extended stay
live-work housing, restaurants, intersections are typical and accessory dwelling units safety. Surface parking areas hotels, small retail businesses
clothing stores, cafes, and characteristics of Walkable are typical characteristics are typically concealed from and open spaces are typical
small shops are typical Urban Neighborhoods. of Walkable Suburban streets by being located behind characteristics of Urban
characteristics of Neighborhoods. large buildings. Campuses.
Main Street Corridors.

MS WUN WS UI UC
SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU




Additional “investment menu” options can be found in the resources section.

30 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 31
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




HOUSING
Current Conditions
THE HOUSING ELEMENT FOCUSES ON
Housing Diversity THE AFFORDABILITY, QUALITY AND
Single-family homes account for over 3,100 existing dwellings. DIVERSITY OF RESIDENTIAL LIVING
Most of the residential subdivisions in the corridor were OPTIONS.
developed during the valley’s growth boom post World War II–
to 1979. The Grant Park Neighborhood and the Roosevelt Place
East subdivision are some of the oldest subdivisions in the city of
Phoenix and eligible as historic districts. Mobile home parks are
one unique housing type found within the corridor making up
15%, or 1100 unit’s of the corridor’s housing stock, multi-family
unit’s account for a little less than 2700 unit’s according to the
Maricopa County Assessor’s Office.

Housing Burdens
With a renter population comprising 2/3 of the corridor, and
more than half of renters spending more than 67% of their
Page 341 earnings on housing and transit combined, affordability is a
critical need. Corridor homeowners fair slightly better, but low-
income levels, combined with an older housing stock have left
many homeowners unable to make necessary repairs, and can
lead to substandard housing conditions.




BY THE NUMBERS
67% 15%
household earnings are of corridor’s housing
spent on housing + stock are within
transportation expenses mobile home parks

Coffelt Housing
Source: TOD Grant Team


32 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 33
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




HOUSING
Best Practice Community Investments

OVERVIEW
Every community desires investments that come in many forms, shapes, and sizes. All community
investments have a unique place and bring unique opportunities. The following “investment cards”
provided examples of best practice community investments that when combined begin to articulate
community desired changes towards a shared community vision.


HOUSING
Planning
MIXED INCOME HOUSING Investment
Element Icon
Type

Investment
Image
DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS:
Mixed Income Housing is • Additional Quality,
Community
Page 342 residential development that Affordable Housing Choices
ensures affordability for a • Enhanced Neighborhood Benefits
Investment range of incomes and provides Authenticity and
opportunities to remain in Attractiveness
Description the same home if a resident’s • Additional Quality,
income grows beyond what Affordable Neighborhood
qualifies for subsidy assistance. Choices




MI Investment
SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU
Icon

HOUSING HOUSING HOUSING HOUSING HOUSING
WALKABLE URBAN MID RISE WALKABLE URBAN LOW RISE CO-HOUSING / MULTI-GENERATIONAL HOUSING REVITALIZATION PREFABRICATED HOUSING




DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS: DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS: DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS: DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS: DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS:
Walkable Urban Mid Rise • Additional Quality, Walkable Urban Low Rise • Additional Quality, Co-Housing are residential • Additional Quality, Housing Revitalization are • Additional Quality, Prefabricated Housing is • Additional Quality,
Housing is pedestrian-scaled Affordable Housing Choices Housing is pedestrian-scaled Affordable Housing Choices buildings that are designed Affordable Housing Choices improvements to existing Affordable Housing Choices residential development that Affordable Housing Choices
residential development at • Enhanced Neighborhood residential development at • Enhanced Neighborhood to be occupied by multiple • Enhanced Neighborhood residential buildings that • Enhanced Neighborhood has been developed off-site, • Enhanced Neighborhood
medium to high densities. Authenticity and moderate to medium densities. Authenticity and families with shared common Authenticity and improve quality, health, Authenticity and either completely or in modules Authenticity and
Podium Garage Apartments, Attractiveness Bungalows, Courtyard Attractiveness areas, such as kitchens and Attractiveness accessibility, safety and Attractiveness that can be less expensively Attractiveness
Wrapped Garage Apartments, • Additional Quality, Apartments, Multi-Plexes, • Additional Quality, yards, and sometimes shared • Additional Quality, efficiency. Air filtration • Additional Quality, assembled compared to • Additional Quality,
Lofts and Mixed Use Buildings Affordable Neighborhood Live-Work units, Townhouses, Affordable Neighborhood ownership of the building. Co- Affordable Neighborhood systems, weatherization, Affordable Neighborhood regular construction. Converted Affordable Neighborhood
are examples of Walkable Choices Rowhouses, Patiohouses and Choices Housing is popular for those Choices HVAC replacement, window Choices Shipping Containers and Choices
Urban Mid Rise Housing. Compact Single Family Houses looking for a more social living shading, solar panels, slab modular housing, and pre-
with rear Accessory Dwelling arrangement and potentially repair, and historic façade manufactured accessory
Units are examples of Walkable lower housing costs. restoration are examples of dwelling units are examples of
Urban Low Rise Housing. Housing Revitalization. Prefabricated Housing.




WUM WUL HR PH
CH
SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU
SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU




Additional “investment menu” options can be found in the resources section.

34 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 35
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Current Conditions ELEMENT FOCUSES ON THE FINANCIAL
PROSPERITY OF BUSINESSES AND
Small Business is Big Business
RESIDENTS, INCLUDING THE ACCESS TO
Annual purchasing power within 1/2 mile of the corridor
JOBS, TRAINING AND EDUCATIONAL
center is $250 million; within 2 miles it is $2 billion.
OPPORTUNITIES.
The corridor offers several unique goods, services, and
experiences for people to spend money on. With over 438
local businesses in the corridor it is critical that we continue to
promote growth of our small businesses so that benefits and
profits stay in the community.

Sharing the Wealth
92% of people that live in the corridor and have a job,
travel outside of the corridor to get to that job. The corridor
has a high number and growth in production, construction,
retail, and hospitality jobs. Because new jobs in the corridor
will either be accessible through transit or in the immediate
Page 343 community, transportation expenses will possibly reduce for
households, raising net income and financial security to a new
level.




BY THE NUMBERS
92% OVER
of employed residents
travel outside the 400+
Local Businesses in the
corridor for jobs
Corridor
Travis L. Williams Family Services
Source: TOD Grant Team


36 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 37
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
Best Practice Community Investments
OVERVIEW
Every community desires investments that come in many forms, shapes, and sizes. All community
investments have a unique place and bring unique opportunities. The following “investment cards”
provided examples of best practice community investments that when combined begin to articulate
community desired changes towards a shared community vision.


ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Planning
DISTRICT MARKETING PROGRAM Investment
Element Icon
Type

Investment
Image
DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS:
District Marketing Programs • Enhanced Neighborhood Community
Page 344 provide promotional activities Authenticity and
and marketing to investors Attractiveness Benefits
Investment for projects that have been • Stronger, Opportunity-Rich
identified to help spur Local Economy
economic revitalization in • Additional Quality,
Description accordance with a community’s Affordable Neighborhood
vision. Branding campaigns, Choices
advertising materials, social
media, websites, signage,
data analysis, government
liaison services, and business
recruitment activities are
typical components of a District
Marketing Program.

DM Investment
SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU
Icon

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER QUALITY NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOL BUSINESS CLUSTER PUBLIC ART DAILY LIVING AMENITY




DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS: DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS: DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS: DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS:
A Quality Neighborhood School • Increased Access to DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS:
A Community Learning Center • Increased Access to Public Art is artwork that is • Enhanced Neighborhood Daily Living Amenities provide • Increased Access to
provides educational opportunities is a public school that is highly Careers and Education A Business Cluster is a • Increased Access to
Careers and Education intended to be experienced by Authenticity and goods or services that are Careers and Education
for children and adults to improve valued by the surrounding • Enhanced Neighborhood concentration of interconnected Careers and Education
• Enhanced Neighborhood the general public and is Attractiveness used frequently for daily life. • Enhanced Neighborhood
academic performance, life skills, community and is a key amenity Authenticity and and mutually-beneficial • Enhanced Neighborhood
Authenticity and visible from streets, parks and Examples include pharmacies, Authenticity and
literacy, resume writing and job that enhances the attractiveness Attractiveness businesses located within Authenticity and
Attractiveness other public spaces. Examples grocery stores, health clinics, Attractiveness
searches. Programs are provided of a neighborhood. Quality • Stronger, Opportunity-Rich a specific geographic area. Attractiveness
• Stronger, Opportunity-Rich of Public Art include murals, banks, laundromats and • Stronger, Opportunity-Rich
based on the individual needs Neighborhood Schools perform Local Economy Business Clusters usually form • Stronger, Opportunity-Rich
of the community and typically Local Economy sculptures, statues and creative childcare services. Daily Living Local Economy
well academically, have excellent • Additional Quality, in strategic locations that take Local Economy
include assistance with core • Additional Quality, enhancements to bridges, transit Destinations provide the • Additional Quality,
facilities that are in a good state Affordable Neighborhood advantage of infrastructure, • Additional Quality,
academic subjects, enrichment Affordable Neighborhood stations, civic spaces, canals and most benefit when located in Affordable Neighborhood
of repair, strong relationships Choices such as a rail station, a Affordable Neighborhood
activities, English language Choices other infrastructure. convenient locations, such as Choices
between parents, teachers and regional destination, such as Choices
classes, parenting courses adjacent to light rail stops or
school administrators, provide a an auditorium, or an anchor
and basic computer training. near key intersections.
Community Learning Centers are variety of after school programs institution, such as a hospital or
typically located within public and score highly on state college campus.
libraries, non-profit organizations evaluation measures.
or at neighborhood schools during
non-school hours. CL QN PA DL
SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU
BC
SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU
SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU




Additional “investment menu” options can be found in the resources section.

38 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 39
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




HEALTH
Current Conditions THE HEALTH ELEMENT FOCUSES ON KEY
ASPECTS OF THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT
THAT IMPACT PUBLIC HEALTH,
Health Requires Healthy Food
INCLUDING THE AVAILABILITY OF
The South Central corridor has six full-service supermarkets
HEALTHY FOOD, PUBLIC RECREATIONAL
that provide healthy food accessibility within ½ mile for the
AMENITIES, AND SAFE PLACES TO WALK
majority of residents. Of the nearly 6,048 corridor households,
AND BICYCLE.
approximately 2,000 households live further than a 10-minute
walk to a supermarket. Most of the supermarkets are
concentrated south of Rio Salado.

Put the Creation in Recreation
There are seven city owned parks in the South Central
corridor. Only four of the parks have recreation buildings and
many of the parks have substantial gaps in the recreational
programming they provide. Fifty-two percent of the residents in
the corridor are within a ¼ mile from a park meaning there is a
great opportunity for the remaining forty eight percent. The Rio
Page 345 Salado Habitat Restoration Area is a prime corridor recreation
opportunity at over 595 acres along with 6 trailheads. Tie
that with over 30 miles of canal banks and the 16,000-acre
regional South Mountain Park/Preserve just outside the corridor
and South Central can meet your recreational needs from the
Rio to the Mountain.




BY THE NUMBERS
48% 2,000
residents are over a 1/4 HOUSEHOLDS
mile of a park are greater than
10-minute walk
to a supermarket
Phoenix Memorial Center
Source: TOD Grant Team


40 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 41
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




HEALTH
Best Practice Community Investments

OVERVIEW
Every community desires investments that come in many forms, shapes, and sizes. All community
investments have a unique place and bring unique opportunities. The following “investment cards”
provided examples of best practice community investments that when combined begin to articulate
community desired changes towards a shared community vision.


HEALTH
Planning
PROTECTIVE SHADE AND COOLING Investment
Element Icon
Type

Investment
Image
DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS:
Protective Shade and Cooling • Safer Walking Environment Community
Page 346 are improvements such • Safer Bicycling
as structures, landscaping Environment Benefits
Investment and amenities that cool and • Safer Public Spaces
cover sensitive locations. • Cooler and More
Description Canopies, vegetation, splash Comfortable Outdoor
pads, fountains and other Places
enhancements are used to
reduce exposure to high
temperatures and solar
radiation for targeted locations
such as playgrounds, seating
areas, sports courts and routes
to schools.


PSC Investment
SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU
Icon

HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH
SAFE INTERSECTION ACTIVE FRONTAGES MERCADO TRAFFIC CALMING COMMUNITY SUPPORTED AGRICULTURE




DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS: DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS: DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS: DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS: DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS:
A Safe Intersection is designed • Safer Walking Environment An Active Frontage is the • Additional Neighborhood A Mercado is a large indoor Traffic Calming is a technique • Safer Walking Environment Community Supported • Improved Access to Healthy
• Improved Access to Healthy
to avoid collisions between • Safer Bicycling portion of a building adjacent Amenities that uses a variety of physical • Safer Bicycling Agriculture is a program that Food
market, typically over 60,000 Food
vehicles, pedestrians and Environment to a street or open space and • Safer Public Spaces improvements to slow down Environment allows residents to purchase a
square feet, that contains a • Additional Neighborhood
bicyclists. Depending on the • Safer Public Spaces is designed with elements that vehicular traffic in order to subscription from a farmer in
number of small healthy food Amenities
context, Safe Intersections • Additional Choices for High help prevent crime by enabling provide a safer environment exchange for a regular delivery
vendors. Mercados are major • Increased Job
provide a range of Quality, Convenient and additional surveillance of for pedestrians and bicyclists. of seasonal produce. Customers
retail destinations that provide Opportunities
improvements to protect Low Cost Transportation sidewalks and other public Traffic Calming can include usually pick up boxes of fresh
fresh produce, customer traffic • Enhanced Neighborhood
residents, such as high spaces. Examples include large medians, speed bumps, street produce from a Farmers’
for surrounding businesses and Authenticity
visibility crosswalk paint, curb windows, patios, porches and parking, signage, colored Market each week. Community
extensions, bike boxes, traffic retail stands. employment opportunities for paving, speed tables, narrow Supported Agriculture can
circles, ADA ramps, auditory small-scale entrepreneurs. traffic lanes, landscaping and help support local farmers and
crossing signals, median other measures. preserve local agricultural land
islands, improved lighting, and while providing residents with
signals that allow residents of convenient fresh produce.
all ages a sufficient amount of
time to cross.
SI AF TC CS
M
SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU
SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU




Additional “investment menu” options can be found in the resources section.

42 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 43
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




MOBILITY
Current Conditions THE MOBILITY ELEMENT FOCUSES ON
THE MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE AND
GOODS, INCLUDING THE AVAILABILITY
Choose Transit
OF QUALITY MULTI-MODAL
The average household in the corridor owns 1.23 vehicles.
TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS.
Creating more walkable neighborhoods to provide access
to daily amenities and places of employment can drastically
reduce dependence on automobiles and free up money for
residents to spend on other uses. This is especially important
for the 28% of residents living in South Central that do not own
or lease a vehicle. Affordability and convenience will make
getting to where one needs to go easier than ever and make
choosing transit a clear winner.

Safety First
In order to promote walkability, an area needs to be safe
to walk. There are approximately 91.9 miles of streets in the
corridor. Many streets need resident and Capitol Improvement
Page 347 Project driven investments such as sidewalks, ADA upgrades,
lighting, shade, and bike lanes. The corridor’s two (2) mobility
study areas conducted by the city’s Street Transportation
Department can provide valuable data and connections to
resources to help implement walkability and pedestrian safety
enhancements.




BY THE NUMBERS
28% 91.9 MILES
residents do not own or of Streets
lease a vehicle


Central + Southern Avenue Intersection
Source: TOD Grant Team


44 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 45
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




MOBILITY
Best Practice Community Investments

OVERVIEW
Every community desires investments that come in many forms, shapes, and sizes. All community
investments have a unique place and bring unique opportunities. The following “investment cards”
provided examples of best practice community investments that when combined begin to articulate
community desired changes towards a shared community vision.


MOBILITY
Planning
PASEO Investment
Element Icon
Type

Investment
Image
DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS:
A Paseo is a pedestrian-only • Safer Walking Route
Community
Page 348 walkway, typically 20-40 • Safer Bicycling Route
feet in width, that provides • Additional Choices for High Benefits
Investment open space, building access Quality, Convenient and
and enhanced pedestrian Low Cost Transportation
Description circulation for neighborhoods. • Enhanced Neighborhood
Paseos can be used to provide Authenticity
connections through long
blocks where options for
constructing new streets are
difficult or cost prohibitive.




P Investment
SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU
Icon

MOBILITY MOBILITY MOBILITY MOBILITY MOBILITY
ENHANCED BUS STOP MULTI MODAL STREET URBAN CIRCULATOR BIKE CENTER WAYFINDING SIGNAGE




DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS: DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS: DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS: DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS: DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS:
An Enhanced Bus Stop • Additional Choices for High A Multi-Modal Street is a • Safer Walking Route An Urban Circulator is a small A Bike Center is an indoor • Additional Choices for High Wayfinding Signage are small • Additional Choices for High
• Additional Choices for High
is a local bus stop that is Quality, Convenient and street that accommodates • Safer Bicycling Route space that provides enhanced Quality, Convenient and signs that provide pedestrians Quality, Convenient and
bus or streetcar that connects Quality, Convenient and
designed to encourage Low Cost Transportation all transportation modes - • Additional Choices for High services for bicyclists such Low Cost Transportation and bicyclists with directions Low Cost Transportation
neighborhoods with day-to-day Low Cost Transportation
transit use by improving • Enhanced Neighborhood including pedestrians, bicycles, Quality, Convenient and as showers, lockers, secure • More Efficient Parking to major destinations and
destinations such as schools,
comfort, safety, convenience Authenticity vehicles and transit - at a level Low Cost Transportation parking and sales, rentals, Management landmarks. These signs are
major employers, healthcare
and accessibility for waiting of quality that is consistent parts and repairs. Bike Centers placed in key locations, such as
facilities and grocery stores.
riders. These stops provide a with its existing or planned are generally located at an along major bike routes, canals
Urban Circulators are often
range of enhancements that function and surrounding land intersection between a regional and near light rail stations.
may include vertical shade
planned in short loop routes bicycle route and a major
use context.
structures, dense shade trees, that travel along several streets transportation hub.
waste receptacles, solar- and stop more frequently than
powered lighting, schedule other transit services.
information, route maps,
permeable paving, drinking
fountains, bike racks and
shelters with special coatings
that help keep them cool. EB MM BC WS
UC
SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU
SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU




Additional “investment menu” options can be found in the resources section.

46 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 47
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



GREEN
SYSTEMS THE GREEN SYSTEMS ELEMENT
Current Conditions FOCUSES ON THE DESIGN OF
BUILDINGS AND INFRASTRUCTURE TO
A Desert Oasis
IMPROVE RESOURCE EFFICIENCY AND
South Central tends to be 1.8-5.4 degrees hotter than
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.
surrounding areas because of the number of paved surfaces
and lack of trees. The South Central Corridor spans across
the Central City Village which has 6.1% tree coverage and
South Mountain Village which has 14.5% tree coverage. By
investing in trees, the corridor can reduce its heat island effect
creating more walkable streets and vibrant pedestrian places.
In addition, the City has established a goal of reaching 25%
canopy cover by 2030.

The Original Streaming Service
The Rio Salado Restoration Project is the largest natural
green infrastructure system in the South Central corridor. It is
an ongoing effort to restore the native wetland and riparian
Page 349 habitats of the Salt River benefiting native flora and fauna
and residents through the collection of rain and stormwater
and cooler ambient temperatures. Creating a green street
environment for South Central is possible as demonstrated at
Primeria Iglesia United Methodist Church. The project utilizes
vegetation along with bioswales and curb openings and serves
as a model for small developments, showcasing quality and
affordable stormwater management and shading.



BY THE NUMBERS
14.5 % 6.1 %
tree coverage in South tree coverage
Mountain Village in Central City
Village

Rio Salado Habitat Restoration Area
Source: TOD Grant Team


48 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 49
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



GREEN
SYSTEMS
Best Practice Community Investments
OVERVIEW
Every community desires investments that come in many forms, shapes, and sizes. All community
investments have a unique place and bring unique opportunities. The following “investment cards”
provided examples of best practice community investments that when combined begin to articulate
community desired changes towards a shared community vision.


GREEN SYSTEMS
Planning
NATURAL SHADING + COOLING Investment
Element Icon
Type

Investment
Image
DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS:
Natural Shading and Cooling • More Efficient Water
Community
Page 350 includes trees and other Management
vegetation that help cool the • Cleaner Groundwater Benefits
Investment environment, reduce the urban Supply
heat island, and promote • Cooler and More
Description biodiversity by lowering Comfortable Outdoor
surface and air temperatures Places
through evapotranspiration • Additional Neighborhood
and shade. Shaded surfaces Amenities
can be 20-45 degrees F cooler • Improved Access to
than non-shaded areas. Natural Recreation
Cooling is most useful when
located in strategic places
such as patios, parks, primary
walking routes and within
dense neighborhoods. Investment
NS
SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU
Icon

GREEN SYSTEMS GREEN SYSTEMS GREEN SYSTEMS GREEN SYSTEMS GREEN SYSTEMS
GREEN STREETS WATER CAPTURE + REUSE ENGINEERED SHADE + COOLING GREEN CIVIC SPACE GREEN PARKING




DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS: DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS: DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS: DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS: DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS:
A Green Street is a series of • More Efficient Water Water capture and reuse • More Efficient Water Engineered Shading and Cooling uses A Green Civic Space is a type • More Efficient Water Green Parking is both on-street • More Efficient Water
• Cooler and More
stormwater management Management includes building improvements Management materials, structures and mechanical of urban open space that Management and on-site parking that slows, Management
equipment to cool neighborhoods and Comfortable Outdoor
facilities that include bioswales, • Cleaner Groundwater that collect rain and waste slows, spreads and soaks • Cleaner Groundwater spreads and soaks stormwater • Cleaner Groundwater
vegetated medians, flow through mitigate the urban heat island effect. Places
Supply water for reuse on site, Thermal coatings, white roofs, permeable
stormwater within courtyards, Supply through the use of pervious Supply
planters and stormwater curb • Cooler and More primarily for landscape paving and other heat-resisting plazas, squares, greens and • Enhanced Neighborhood surfaces and vegetated • Cooler and More
extensions to help control storm Comfortable Outdoor irrigation. Rain barrels, cisterns building materials help reduce surface paseos through the use of Authenticity stormwater management Comfortable Outdoor
water events. These stormwater Places and roof reservoirs collect temperatures. Designing breezeways pervious surfaces, bioswales, • Cooler and More facilities. These facilities may Places
management facilities allow on- and height step-backs in buildings
• Additional Neighborhood and store rain water while helps improve air flow and allow heat to rain gardens, green roofs, Comfortable Outdoor include bioswales, infiltration
site infiltration while providing Amenities innovative plumbing techniques dissipate more rapidly at night. Awnings, green walls and vegetation. Places trenches, flow-through
attractive streetscapes that • Improved Access to are used to collect wastewater canopies, trellises, arcades, galleries Green Civic Spaces improve • Additional Neighborhood planters and rain gardens.
increase canopy coverage, lower Recreation from sinks, dishwashers and and ramadas provide dense shade, neighborhood aesthetics Amenities Green parking offers a cleaner
pedestrian level temperatures and are especially useful in areas that
clothes washers. Water capture are difficult to plant trees. Additional while simultaneously cooling alternative to traditional
and support biodiversity.
and reuse reduces potable examples of Engineered Shading and pedestrian areas and using parking by improving
Green Streets can also improve Cooling include misters, fans and
water costs while helping to innovative and cost effective stormwater management and
quality of life by providing innovative projects such as on-demand
keep landscaping lush. stormwater management improving filtering stormwater
linear parks, called greenways, solar powered air conditioning at light
rail stops and solar-powered retractable practices. pollutants.
within neighborhoods. GS WC GC
canopies that provide shade during the GP
day and allow heat to dissipate at night. ES
SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU
SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU




Additional “investment menu” options can be found in the resources section.

50 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 51
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




PUBLIC
PARTICIPATION
“MEETING THE COMMUNITY
MEMBERS WHERE THEY ARE.”




Page 351




52 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 53
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




TOD GRANT
TEAM OVERVIEW
TOD Grant Team
The Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Grant Team began work in collaboration with the City of
Phoenix on the South Central project in May 2018. The Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Grant
Team includes seven organizations: Promise Arizona, Gould Evans, Center for Neighborhood
Technology (CNT), Wilson & Company, Local First, Friendly House, and Hustle Phoenix. Their efforts
have been focused on three project areas: Outreach, Business Assistance and Transit Oriented
Development (TOD) Planning.

Project Area
The geographical area of the project is the South Central Corridor. The corridor boundaries vary
depending on the specific project focus area. The planning activities are focused on the area
between 7th Avenue and 7th Street from Jefferson to South Mountain Avenue; The Business
Assistance service area lies within 3rd Avenue and 3rd Street, between Van Buren Street and
Baseline Road.
Page 352


Outreach Approach
Outreach was a broad-based category supporting both the Business Assistance and Transit
Oriented Development (TOD) planning efforts, with the main objective of listening to the concerns
and aspirations of community members, documenting them, and inspiring participation from
community members to help plan for their future community. The planning goal was to engage a
minimum of 100 people per station stop through the combination of all methods of outreach for the
planning process.

Visioning Approach
The Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Grant Team reached people by meeting the community
members where they were and by attending events in the South Central community to allow
community members to conveniently provide input through a variety of engagement methods and
participate in visioning exercises and activities. This public engagement and outreach strategy has
served the project well. The following pages represent several aspects of the TOD Grant team work
that contributed to this South Central community vision and plan, for more complete documentation
please see the “South Central Transit Oriented Development Business Assistance + Land Use
Planning” Executive Summary in the resources section.



54 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 55
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



HISTORIC FACTORS
TOD GRANT TEAM OVERVIEW




Page 353




> Segregation x Annexation: History of South Phoenix
• Following the establishment of a prominent identity, South Phoenix was impacted by the racial lines drawn through real
estate decisions, redlining, and race-restrictive covenants in the early 1900s. Minorities in Phoenix settled south of Van
Buren Street due to discriminatory home loan practices by the federal Home Owners’ Loan Corporation (HOLC). Barrios
were formed and were isolated from Anglo communities as socioeconomic divisions deepened.
• In 1960, the City of Phoenix annexed what is now known as ‘South Central’ as part of the City of Phoenix. Nearly 60
years later, this community of strong cultural capital seeks action to their infrastructure goals of creating a connected
sustainable community.




56 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 57
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




PUTTING PEOPLE FIRST
TOD GRANT TEAM OVERVIEW




Page 354




> Put People First + Listen
Methodology started with building on the work of local non-profit partners that have been embedded in the community for
decades, paired with national researchers. Outreach tactics began by employing analog and technological approaches to
bridge multilingual door-to-door outreach, with big data analytical tools that inform the field work; including door-to-door
conversations and assessments, phone banking, and business assistance outreach.
58 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 59
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




INFORMATION + FACTS
TOD GRANT TEAM OVERVIEW




Page 355




> Provide Information + Facts
The goal was to combat misinformation that was generating through a campaign to end transit projects around the country.
Our team focused on providing the community with accurate information and proper tools to begin imagining a better future
for themselves and their neighbors.




60 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 61
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



PLANNING TOGETHER
TOD GRANT TEAM OVERVIEW




Page 356




> Planning, Together
Through a 10-month initiative of ’meeting the community where they are’, a multilingual educational campaign was launched
highlighting “Did you Know” facts that provided information about the benefit of reducing expenses and increasing affordability
through transit. The campaign promoted topics that were prioritized by the community including affordability, local
development, regional access and walkability.

This initiative provided the community with proper tools to encourage participation and plan for a better future together.

62 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 63
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



COMMUNITY REACH
TOD GRANT TEAM OVERVIEW




Page 357




> Reach
Within the span of a year and a half, our team has knocked on over 10,000 doors, completed over 700 residential
assessments, contacted over 400 businesses, attended/presented at nearly 70 events/meetings, hosted two
series of community planning workshops which ultimately led to an initial draft of a community driven plan.



64 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 65
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



COMMUNITY INPUT
TOD GRANT TEAM OVERVIEW




Page 358




> Meeting The Community Where They Are
For the last year and a half, the TOD Grant team, a collaborative of eight professional firms and local non-profit
organizations has shared the trajectory, challenges and opportunities to empower a community to formulate their own
goals and envision a future leveraging their cultural capital.

66 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 67
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



COMMUNITY IDENTIFIED
INVESTMENTS
TOD GRANT TEAM OVERVIEW




North Region Rio Salado Region




Page 359




South Region South Mountain Region




> Mapping Activities
Community members were encouraged to identify areas that were at risk of displacement, which areas are
important to prioritize decisions on and which investments were appropriate for the different areas within the
corridor. Each activity included a map to engage community members and gather input.




68 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 69
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




COMMUNITY PRIORITIZED
INVESTMENTS
TOD GRANT TEAM OVERVIEW




Page 360




> Community Identified Investments
62 cards in six categories were used to geolocate potential investments identified by the community. Investments
identified included neighborhood retentions, multi modal streets, parking reductions, walkable urban neighborhoods
and water capture and reuse.


70 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 71
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



BUILDING + HOUSING
TYPOLOGIES
TOD GRANT TEAM OVERVIEW
Zoning + Building/Housing Typologies l Missing Middle Broadway Station l Minor Urban Center




ZONING


Page 361




0 0.125 0.25 0.5 mi


N



> Transferability
Overall the methodology and planning approach is transferable to other communities
> Urban Walkable Code Application preparing for a similar investment. It is also applicable to new development that desires
The Application of the Walkable Urban (WU) Code creates a more walkable, urban to create access, place and value through compact, connected, diverse development
pattern of development along the light rail corridor while reducing the emphasis on patterns through policy and practice.
and need for parking while focusing on implementing typologies respectful of the
existing neighborhoods while meeting the needs of the community.

72 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 73
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



TRANSPARENCY
TOD GRANT TEAM OVERVIEW




Page 362




> Geographic Analog
We listened and organized voices through geomapping and organizing the need by area. The direct
responses and input were organized and mapped for a unified vision.


74 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 75
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



VISION THEMES
TOD GRANT TEAM OVERVIEW




> Emerging Overall Themes


• Environmentally Equitable Compact Community
• Sustainability and Resiliency – reducing vulnerability
• Stabilization of neighborhoods is necessary, blending new economic development
• Areas at risk of displacement were identified by input and technical analysis
Page 363 • Desire for range of housing options and affordability are key + mixed income is desirable
• Desire for incremental change and growth in an appropriate way
• Authentic regional destination that supports local businesses and shares culture
• Improved parks and South Mountain access is important
• Community would walk / bike more if there was shade, lighting, safe sidewalks
• Desire for more jobs in health, education, service, industrial, tech. opportunities




76 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 77
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



ILLUSTRATIONS
TOD GRANT TEAM OVERVIEW




Page 364




> Varying Scales
A community led plan was developed for the 5.5 square mile corridor, broken
up into four regions that encompasses the voices of the community
geographically and includes:
• Overall master plan
• Vision statement
• Density intensity per station area
• Catalytic concept for future development


78 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 79
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




ROAD SHOW
TOD GRANT TEAM OVERVIEW




Page 365




> Meeting the Community Members Where They Are
The Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Grant Team reached people by meeting the community members
where they were and by attending events in the South Central community to allow community members to
conveniently provide input through a variety of engagement methods and participate in exercises. This strategy
has served the outreach and engagement efforts well.

80 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 81
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




BUSINESS ASSISTANCE
TOD GRANT TEAM OVERVIEW




Page 366




> Meeting the Community Members Where They Are
In parallel with the planning effort, the TOD team worked with businesses within the project boundary area,
preparing business owners at multiple phases of the light rail extension construction. The goal of the Business
Assistance team was to connect with each business to conduct and assessment of their needs and build a plan
to work towards obtaining those goals.

82 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 83
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




COMMUNITY PLANNING
WORKSHOP SERIES #1
TOD GRANT TEAM OVERVIEW




Page 367




> Share Your Vision For the Future
The first series of workshops were located at the Carver Museum and Cultural Center, in the northern section of
the corridor. Six large exhibits were set up around the workshop space which included a variety of innovative,
unique, and creative engagement methods designed to gather community feedback, all related to the planning
elements. Other activities included story capturing and youth engagement.

84 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 85
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




COMMUNITY PLANNING
WORKSHOP SERIES #2
TOD GRANT TEAM OVERVIEW




Page 368




> See Your Vision For the Future
The second series of workshops were located at the South Mountain Community Center, in the southern section
of the corridor. Community members were asked to identify investment types related to the six planning elements
that should be considered throughout the various station areas within the South Central corridor. Each table was
provided a deck of investment cards that the community members could look through and place on the map.

86 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 87
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS
TOD GRANT TEAM OVERVIEW




Page 369




> Did We Hear You?
Two public events, located at Academia Del Pueblo and the South Mountain Community Center, were organized
by the TOD team to present the conceptual drawings following the community planning effort for the past
year. The presentations demonstrated a reflection of key ideas and a compilation of the community vision that
was shared and documented throughout the planning process. The public events allowed for discussion and
comments from the community.
88 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 89
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




PREVIOUS EFFORTS
TOD GRANT TEAM OVERVIEW
South Central Neighborhood Transit Health
Impact Assessment (SCNTHIA) Study
thomas rd Downtown Phoenix Plan

Quality of Life Plan
27th ave 19th ave 7th ave Central City South Area
central ave 7th st
Del Rio Area Brownfields Plan
mcdowell rd Rio Salado Beyond the Banks Area Plan
Rio Montana Area Plan
Target Area B Redevelopment Plan
Baseline Area Master Plan


van buren st
jefferson st
lincoln st
buckeye rd




broadway rd

Page 370 40th st
32nd st
southern ave

16th st 24th st
baseline rd
south mountain ave
dobbins rd




Recognizing that reports developed by the City, community groups, and organizations already exist, the TOD
Grant Team reviewed these past reports and assessments in order to continue building on those efforts, while
updating certain aspects and incorporating the community’s vision for their future community. Some In parallel
with the planning effort, the TOD team worked with businesses within the project boundary area, preparing
business owners at multiple phases of the light rail extension construction. The goal of the Business Assistance
team was to connect with each business to conduct and assessment of their needs and build a plan to work
90 WHO WE ARE towards obtaining those goals. WHO WE ARE 91
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



PARTNERING
TOD GRANT TEAM OVERVIEW
MEETINGS




Page 371




> Community Resource
The City of Phoenix initiated a monthly partnering meeting comprised of local non-profit and organizational
stakeholders with the purpose of sharing events and other resources across organizations. A draft Resource
Directory has been created from a questionnaire distributed to the affiliations of the group in which partners
indicate services offered and contact information. The Resource Directory is anticipated to be a living document
that regularly updates various resources available to the South Central Community.

92 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 93
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




SOUTH CENTRAL TOD
STEERING COMMITTEE
FRAMEWORK INTRODUCTION
The Committee Activity Two: Headline “Visioning”
The South Central Transit-Oriented Development For the Headline Activity, committee members
(TOD) Steering Committee is comprised of envisioned newspaper headlines they would like
community leaders representing stakeholder to see regarding the South Central Corridor in
groups in the areas surrounding the South the future. The goal of the activity was to identify
Central light rail extension. The committee was existing assets to be preserved and opportunities
appointed by Mayor and Council to serve for improvements that could be celebrated. The
as advisors to City staff and to help develop committee wrote down several headlines with
this TOD policy plan to realize a shared themes celebrating community led decisions,
community vision and implementation strategies keeping people safe and in place, highlighting
for the future of the corridor. Members serve area’s history, a better future for the coming
as community leaders by representing their generations, shared prosperity, achieving
stakeholder groups and by advocating for homeownership, and a wealth of entertainment
Page 372 and playing a direct role in implementing the options that will truly make the corridor a “World
plan. Meetings were open to the public and class destination”.
took place every 3rd Thursday of the month.
The committee work program included several Activity Three: Framework + Goals
key activities to facilitate committee discussion The committee participated in an activity where
guidance and feedback on all aspects of the they could provide their personal assessment of
planning project. the 6 planning elements framework and goals
and if they agreed that they the framework
Activity One: Planning Element Matrix provides a strong foundation towards achieving
This activity had committee members provide the overall vision to Reject Displacement.
input regarding the Existing Conditions for The results showed that the committee built
the 6 planning elements. Steering committee a consensus around the overall planning
members provided additional feedback in frameworks ability to work harmoniously
writing about any additional data they would towards achieving the community’s vision for a
like to see both short and long term. From the sustainable and equitable future for all existing
first activity onwards, the committee identified and future residents.
the importance of outreach and engagement,
especially of those most at risk of displacement
including senior citizen’s with health and
financial struggles, and those who cannot
receive benefits due to their immigration status.
94 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 95
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




SOUTH CENTRAL TOD
STEERING COMMITTEE
IMPLEMENTATION RESOURCES + COMMITTEE VALUES

Activity Four: Implementation
During the implementation phase of the project
the committee was introduced to several city
department representatives to share information
on tools, resources, and programs available and
how they may be considered for implementation
of the community vision and plan. This naturally
lent itself to robust discussions between the
committee and the presenting departments and
helped to inform implementation strategies,
policies, and actions while achieving efficient
resource management and pursuing new tools,
Page 373
resources, and implementation partnerships.

Activity Five: Word Cloud
Amid the historic and national health pandemic
with COVID-19, and in an attempt to revive the
moment of the planning work for the corridor
communities, the Committee participated in
an activity to capture community values for
increased hope, love, and resiliency during
a time of crises felt by all. To discuss actions
on working towards increased sustainability.
Committee members presented their ideas,
stories, actions, and words towards increased
sustainability. The ideas then sprang to life as a
visualization with the words in different colors,
orientations (vertical, horizontal), and sizes. The
most repeated words showed up larger than the
other words. This “word cloud” now serves as a
reminder of what fundamentally matters for the
future of the corridor and the community plan.

96 WHO WE ARE WHO WE ARE 97
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




PART 3 WHAT WE WANT



A shared community vision for
environmentally equitable compact
and connected communities;
sustainable and resilient;
incremental change and growth;
towards a world-class regional
Page 374 destination that supports local small
businesses, shares cultures, and
improves health for all existing and
future residents.



There are two keywords to keep in mind as we
“ continue moving forward in the process, and they
are “envision” and “protect”.

CHAIRWOMAN EVA OLIVAS

South Central TOD Steering Committee 2018-2021


98 WHAT WE WANT WHAT WE WANT 99
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




CORRIDOR WIDE
VISION TO
REJECT DISPLACEMENT
The South Central Corridor REJECTS DISPLACEMENT of our existing residents and businesses What are the potential drivers of How does the plan address this vision
and celebrates our diverse cultural heritage. We support equitable transit-oriented development, displacement: INVESTMENT & CHANGE and reduce risks for displacement?
designed as a sustainable future that improves the quality of life for all existing and future families
and residents of this corridor. • New investments that result in the physical • Provides a comprehensive framework to
displacement of existing residents and guide investment, both private and public that
businesses such as the demolition of existing aligns with the community based vision.
Specifically, our community envisions: homes and buildings for new projects. • Designates areas identified by the community
• New investments that create economic for protection and enhancement.
Page 375
• Protecting our existing community members • Creation of an active, vibrant, culturally and challenges for residents and businesses to • Creates a policy foundation for future
from displacement by prioritizing equitable ethnically relevant corridor prominent in safe, remain in place such as increases in the development that embraces the existing
community identified investments and unique, and intentional public gathering cost of living or a lack of affordable and character, scale, and intensity of the
services for our most vulnerable populations. places where everyone is welcome. attainable (equitable) housing options. corridor’s neighborhoods
• Fostering community collaboration on new • Empowering our existing residents to build • Changes to the built environment that • Establishes a comprehensive list of strategies
development projects to create a convenient, personal and community wealth and exacerbate existing environmental and health aimed at engaging both the city and the
affordable, and opportunity rich place in resiliency through equitable and innovative challenges such as increasing nighttime community to continue working together to
which our residents, businesses, and youth strategies to achieve home, land, and temperatures or lack of access to healthy implement the plan.
will thrive. business ownership. food or open space.
• Prioritizing safe, authentic, shaded, green
infrastructure networks connecting to existing
and new assets, schools, services, retail and
amenities to support equitable access and
overall community health.




100 WHAT WE WANT WHAT WE WANT 101
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES
LINCOLN Lincoln Street


Grant Park
NORTH|Reconnect Communities


El Portal
American
Legion
NORTH
Friendly House

Friendly House
Home Care


Warehouse 215 Interstate 17 (I-17)
St. Anthony @ Bentley Projects
Catholic Parish
7th Street
AUDUBON
7th Avenue

Central Park
RIO SALADO|Celebrate Natural Resources
LEGEND RIO
Buildings Parks / Open Space
Point of Pride Existing Park
N
Proposed Light Rail Station

Existing Building Proposed Park SALADO
Retrofit/Adaptive Reuse Building Community Gathering

Proposed Building

Nina Mason Pulliam
Rio Salado Elwood Street
FOUR DISTINCT AREAS Greg Brownell Audubon Center




Page 376
SOUTH CENTRAL COMMUNITIES BROADWAY



Four Distinct Areas The Rio Salado area celebrates a well-
SOUTH|Strengthen Traditions and Culture
Our rich heritage and environmental features connected, enhanced, and publicly accessible
LEGEND
create a corridor that is unique to anywhere natural resource abundant in gathering places Ed Pastor Transit
Buildings Parks / Open Space Center
N
else in Phoenix. This plan for our community’s and diverse recreation opportunities for local Point of Pride Existing Park Proposed Light Rail Station
SOUTH
Existing Building Proposed Park
future is customized into 4 distinct areas of the and regional guests. Travis L Williams Family
Services Center Retrofit/Adaptive Reuse Building Community Gathering
corridor, each uniquely focused on the people’s Proposed Building

history, character, uses, and aspirations to blend The South Area is a vibrant connected
all future community identified investments and environment that strengthens and prioritizes
Arizona Department of
enhancements in an equitable and appropriate families, youth, and protecting the most Economic Security
way: North of the Interstate 17 Freeway (I-17), vulnerable populations while inspiring all future Espiritu Charter BASELINE
Vineyard Road
School
7th Street
at the Rio Salado, South of the Rio Salado and generations to live, work, and thrive in place. 7th Avenue
Poncho’s Mexican
most adjacent to South Mountain. LEGEND
S. MOUNTAIN |Health and Recreation Hub Food and Cantina
The South Mountain area is a community Buildings Parks / Open Space
Point of Pride Existing Park
N
Proposed Light Rail Station
The North Area reconnects communities, hub for health and recreation investments. The Existing Building Proposed Park
SOUTH
Azukar Coffee
residents, and businesses, from the tracks green infrastructure along the canal banks Retrofit/Adaptive Reuse Building Community Gathering

Proposed Building
(downtown) and across the Rio Salado to and to South Mountain Park, connects people MOUNTAIN
improve the quality of life and neighborhood in affordable housing and mixed income Mesquite
environment for all. residential neighborhoods to improved health NFL YET College
Prep Academy
and healthcare jobs. Mountain Park
Health Center South Mountain Avenue N
South Pointe
102 WHAT WE WANT Junior High WHAT WE WANT 103
South Pointe
High School Champion Schools -
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




NORTH AREA
Page 377
RECONNECT COMMUNITIES
2045 COMMUNITY VISION
The North Area reconnects communities, residents, and businesses, from the tracks (downtown) and
across the Rio Salado to improve the quality of life and neighborhood environment for all.

Specifically for this area, our community envisions:
• New pathways for building individual and community wealth
• Protection and celebration of historical elements and stories
• Convenient, equitable, individual and community access to free choice in regards to fresh food
– such as urban agriculture, the City’s Local Food System program, neighborhood grocery,
permanent restaurants and mobile services
• Enhanced recreation and entertainment options – affordable to local residents
• Enhanced existing parks with more amenities, shade, and access by connected green, shaded,
lighted, safe paths within the neighborhoods
• Infill of vacant lots with diverse housing options appropriate to existing neighborhoods and
blend the new with the old (affordable, mixed income housing)
• Parking solutions that balance business and sports needs with residential neighborhood quality
of life


104 VISION NORTH VISION NORTH 105
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES


Washington St
NORTH AREA - PRIORITIZING GROWTH
The North Area has prioritized growth to reject displacement of existing residents and
businesses, while encouraging strategic and incremental growth respectful of the areas existing
character. Established neighborhoods, although zoned for higher intensity and scales, utilize Jefferson St.
appropriate housing and building typologies that fit the existing context while achieving the desired
community vision for change. RIO SALADO




PROTECT
Areas designated for slow incremental growth strategies, smaller scale and lowest
intensity investments. *Housing investments examples: ADU’s, Tiny Homes, manufactured homes,
duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes. Lincoln St
Moderate Medium Medium

w t all
ge Low Hig
Slo Fas Sm Lar h


Rate of Change Scale of Change Intensity of Change

Page 378
ENHANCE
Areas designated for slow to moderate rate of growth strategies, medium scale and
medium intensity investments. *Housing investments examples: Courtyard Apartments,
Townhouses medium multiplex, live-work.
Buckeye Rd
Moderate Medium Medium
all h
Slo t ge Low
w Fas Sm Lar Hig


Rate of Change Scale of Change Intensity of Change COMMUNITY IDENTIFIED AREAS

INVEST
Areas designated for moderate rate of growth strategies, medium/large scale and N
7th Ave 3rd Ave 3rd St 7th St
medium/high intensity investments. *Housing investments examples: Mid-rise apartments/
Central Ave.
condos, Mixed Use Residential.
LEGEND
Mohave St
Moderate Medium Medium

w t all Protect Areas
ge Low Hig
Slo Fas Sm Lar h
Enhance Areas

Rate of Change Scale of Change Intensity of Change Invest Areas way
I-17 Free
106 VISION NORTH VISION NORTH 107
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES


Washington St
NORTH AREA - COMMUNITY IDENTIFIED
AND PRIORITIZED INVESTMENTS
The North Area has prioritized investments to reject displacement of existing residents Jefferson St.
and businesses, while encouraging strategic and incremental growth respectful of the areas
existing character. The following map identifies the community identified and prioritized
investments associated with the Land Use, Housing and Economic Development planning
elements.

Lincoln Stop
A D North Neighborhoods
Mixed-use transit stop. • Housing revitalization and infill of
• Variety of mixed-income housing vacant lots with of a size appropriate
B A C Lincoln St
opportunities, ownership and rental. for the neighborhood.
• Retail, restaurants, services, office
uses and park/open space. E Buckeye Stop
• Mid- to High-rise development (4-7 Mixed-Use transit stop
stories, up to 10 at the intersection) • Variety of housing opportunities,
in a walkable format – buildings to ownership and rental, and affordable
Page 379 the street, first floor entry and parking and market costs. D D
behind the buildings. • Supporting small retail uses.
• Mid-rise development (2-4 stories)
in a walkable format – generally
West Lincoln Corridor buildings to the street, first floor entry Buckeye Rd
B
Mixed-use neighborhood. and parking behind the buildings. E
• Mid-rise (2-4 stories) mixed-use and
residential development Interstate Neighborhoods
• Small -scale commercial services F
• Housing revitalization and infill of
• Mixed-income housing, ownership
vacant lots with a size appropriate for
and rental the neighborhood.
East Lincoln Corridor
C Employment Neighborhood
7th Ave 3rd Ave 3rd St 7th St
• Mid-rise (2-4 stories, up to 9 N
Central Ave.
ILLUSTRAIVE PLAN
stories at the north end of area) LEGEND
F
development Buildings Parks / Open Space Mohave St
Point of Pride Existing Park Proposed Light Rail Station
• Business cluster, incubators and Existing Building Proposed Park
F
5 Minute Walks
light/specialty manufacturing with Retrofit/Adaptive Reuse Building Community Gathering

support retail and services. Proposed Building N
ILLUSTRAIVE PLAN
LEGEND
way
Buildings Parks / Open Space I-17 Free
108 VISION NORTH Point of Pride Existing Park Proposed Light Rail Station
VISION NORTH 109
Existing Building Proposed Park
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES


Washington St
NORTH AREA - LAND USE 2045
NORTH - LAND USE PRIORITIES
Community Wealth
Jefferson St.
New pathways for individual and
community wealth have emerged
through the prioritization of a diverse,
multi-scaled, and context sensitive
land use mix. Development intensity
is focused at the edges of established
neighborhoods and newer investment
protects and celebrates the area history. Lincoln St
Opportunities are in abundance for
small and local businesses as newer
development provides low cost and
community accessible retail spaces to
complement diverse housing options.

Page 380 Lincoln Street Mixed Use Corridor
With the most intensity and scale for
growth in the North Area, the Lincoln
corridor has become a mixed-use
destination with a variety of medium- Buckeye Rd
scaled housing options providing the
much needed support for thriving small
and local businesses.

Established Neighborhood Infill
Established neighborhoods have grown
into vibrant walkable communities
LAND USE N
with appropriately scaled incremental 7th Ave 3rd Ave 3rd St 7th St
growth providing diverse housing options
LEGEND
Central Ave.
consistent in character such as accessory
Single-Family Residential Mixed-Use Residential
dwelling units (granny flats/casitas) small LAND USE (Office, Residential & Retail) N
Multi-Family Residential
Mohave St
scale courtyard apartments and small Retail
Mixed-Use Commercial
scale duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes LEGEND (Office & Retail) Industrial

all providing front porches, patios, and Single-Family Residential Mixed-Use Residential
(Office, Residential & Retail)
well shaded landscape setbacks. Multi-Family Residential
Retail
Mixed-Use Commercial way
(Office & Retail) Industrial I-17 Free
110 VISION NORTH VISION NORTH 111
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES


Washington St
NORTH AREA - COMMUNITY IDENTIFIED
AND PRIORITIZED INVESTMENTS
The North Area has prioritized investments to reject displacement of existing residents Jefferson St.
and businesses, while encouraging strategic and incremental growth respectful of the areas
existing character. The following map identifies the community identified and prioritized
investments associated with the Health, Green Systems and Mobility planning elements.

Lincoln Stop
A D North Neighborhoods
Mixed-use transit stop. • Improvement to Buckeye and
• Lincoln Street Improvements – safety 3rd Avenue/Street for improved
improvements, bike and pedestrian pedestrian, biking safety and B A Lincoln St
improvements, and greening of the connectivity.
C
corridor for shade and comfort. • Improvement of existing parks and
• Central Avenue - pedestrian green spaces to support development
enhancement for safety and comfort, and neighborhoods. – active uses,
wider sidewalk, shading – natural and community gardens space, open/
man-made. green space and public art.
Page 381 • Enhanced bus stops. D D
B West Lincoln Corridor Interstate Neighborhoods
F
Mixed-use neighborhood. • Improvement to 3rd Street/Avenue
• Improved walkability – complete for improved pedestrian, biking safety
sidewalk network and shading.
Buckeye Rd
and connectivity.
• Lincoln Street Improvements – safety • Provide a direct connection along
improvements, bike and pedestrian 3rd Street alignment under
improvements, and greening of the Maricopa Parkway to better connect
corridor for shade and comfort. neighborhood to the south.
• New green space to support residents. • Provide a direct connection
along
STREET 3rd street
NETWORK alignment under N
Maricopa Parkway to better connect
C East Lincoln Corridor 7th Ave 3rd Ave 3rd St 7th St
neighborhood to the south.
Employment Neighborhood
Central Ave.
• Walkability – enhance street network LEGEND F
for better pedestrian connections. Mohave St
• Lincoln Street Improvements - safety Existing Street F
improvements, bike and pedestrian
Proposed Street
improvements, and greening of the
STREET NETWORK N
corridor for shade and comfort. Multi-Modal Enhancements
way
LEGEND
I-17 Free
112 VISION NORTH VISION NORTH 113
Existing Street
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES


Washington St
NORTH AREA - OPEN SPACE 2045
NORTH - OPEN SPACE PRIORITIES
Enhance Existing Jefferson St.
The North area reconnects communities,
residents, and businesses, from the
tracks (downtown) and across the Rio
Salado to improve the quality of life and
neighborhood environment for all.

A new well shaded and equitable open
space network provides all residents Lincoln St
access to recreation within 1/4 mile
(10-minute walk) enhancing and
investing in the established walkable
urban street grid founded on a 300 foot
block pattern that sets this area apart as
one of the oldest and original walkable
Page 382 urban communities to have been created
in the Phoenix area.

Convenient, equitable, individual and
community access to free choice in Buckeye Rd
regards to fresh food – such as urban
agriculture, the City’s Local Food System
program, neighborhood corner grocery
stores, restaurants and mobile services
have sprinkled the area in a vibrant and
respectful way.

Existing and established parks and
recreation areas have grown to welcome
7th Ave 3rd Ave 3rd St 7th St
PUBLIC SPACE
new and old residents with enhanced
Central Ave.
recreation and entertainment options
more amenities, shade, and access via
Mohave St
LEGEND
well connected green, shaded, lighted,
and safe paths within the neighborhoods Existing Public Spaces
STREET NETWORK N
to key recreational destinations.
Proposed Public or Semi-Public Spaces way
LEGEND I-17 Free
114 VISION NORTH Existing Street
VISION NORTH 115
Proposed Street
School
BUCKEYE
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS
LINCOLN INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



Lowell Elementary
NORTH AREA - LINCOLN STATION 2045 School


Lo-Lo’s Chicken &
GRANT PARK LINCOLN RECONNECTED Waffles
In the year 2045 the Lincoln Station is at the center of a newly activated mixed use medium
scaled east-west corridor defining and preserving the historic walkable urban grid with well
shaded and well connected streets. Smaller scale infill surrounds this transit hub with a mixture
of unique and diverse neighborhood scaled housing choices and small businesses. The adjacent
Lo-Lo’s Chicken
Warehouse District
& had seen moderate growth and adaptive reuse providing community
accessible Waffles
jobs, education, and creative co-working spaces. Grant Park and Central Park have
been enhanced with additional amenities to support the community growth and trees have
matured to full potential providing an abundance of shade and cooling.

EL PORTAL The purpose of this Illustrative rendering is not to show development exactly as it will occur, but to provide visual guidance on
community identified “priority sites” as it relates to the overall community vision, and to demonstrate a range of development scales
and intensity respectful of existing neighborhoods, parcels and block configurations, and to be consistent with adopted station area
“Place Types” to provide additional guidance for the application of the Walkable Urban LEGEND
form based code, where appropriate.
AMERICAN LEGION
Buildings
Properties located in the Downtown Code may not depict the
Page 383 full development entitlements/potential currently allowed Point of Pride
FRIENDLY HOUSE under the provisions as regulated by the Downtown Code.
Existing Building

Retrofit/Adaptive Reuse Building
LEGEND
Buildings Proposed
Parks / Open SpaceBuilding
FRIENDLY HOUSE HOME CARE Point of Pride
Warehouse 215 Existing Park

@Existing
Bentley
Building Projects Proposed Park

Retrofit/Adaptive Reuse Building Community Gathering

Proposed Building Downtown Code Existing
Character Areas

WAREHOUSE 215 @ BENTLEY PROJECTS
ST. ANTHONY
CATHOLIC PARISH




Parks / Open Space
CENTRAL PARK Existing Park
N
Proposed Light Rail Station
116 VISION NORTH Proposed Park VISION NORTH 117
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS
BUCKEYE INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



NORTH AREA - BUCKEYE STATION 2045
BUCKEYE

LOWELL ELEMENTARY
ST. ANTHONY
SCHOOL
Lowell Elementary CATHOLIC PARISH
School
BUCKEYE



Lowell Elementary
St. Anthony
School
Catholic Parish


Lo-Lo’s Chicken &
Waffles
CENTRAL PARK
Central Park
Page 384


Lo-Lo’s Chicken &
LO-LO’S CHICKEN
Waffles
& WAFFLES




LEGEND
BUCKEYE RECONNECTED Buildings Parks / Open Space
The Buckeye Station in the year 2045 has established itself as a local and small business Point of Pride Existing Park Proposed Light Rail Station
node with vibrant, active entertainment and restaurant uses along Central Avenue. Adjacent
Existing Building Proposed Park
neighborhoods have experienced slow to moderate incremental infill of vacant lots and
and desires of existing
adaptive reuse of existing buildings to protect and enhance the needsLEGEND Retrofit/Adaptive Reuse Building Community Gathering
residents.
Buildings Proposed
Parks / Open SpaceBuilding
guidance
The purpose of this Illustrative rendering is not to show development exactly as it will occur, but to provide visualPoint on
of Pride Existing Park
N
Proposed Light Rail Station
community identified “priority sites” as it relates to the overall community vision, and to demonstrate a range of development scales
and intensity respectful of existing neighborhoods, parcels and block configurations, and to be consistent with adopted
Existing station
Buildingarea Proposed Park
“Place Types” to provide additional guidance for the application of the Walkable Urban form based code, where appropriate.
Retrofit/Adaptive Reuse Building Community Gathering

Proposed Building
118 VISION NORTH VISION NORTH 119
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




RIO SALADO AREA
Page 385
CELEBRATE NATURAL RESOURCES
2045 COMMUNITY VISION
The Rio Salado area celebrates a well-connected, enhanced, and publicly accessible natural
resource abundant in gathering places and diverse recreation opportunities for local and regional
guests. Land on the river banks has become a vibrant hub of vital community investments and
diverse housing options bringing community wealth, enhancements, and equitable prosperity to all
corridor resident’s and the region.

Specifically for this area, our community envisions:
• Expanded quality work-force training and job opportunities to raise incomes for local residents
• Mixed-use development for mixed-incomes – blending needs of corridor residents and others
who may arrive at the Rio Salado as a destination
• Sustainable designs for all new development utilizing both indigenous and contemporary
approaches
• Improved health outcomes for all residents and workers




120 VISION RIO SALADO VISION RIO SALADO 121
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



RIO SALADO AREA - PRIORITIZING GROWTH
The Rio Salado Area has prioritized growth to reject displacement of existing residents and eway
businesses, while encouraging strategic and incremental growth respectful of the areas existing I-17 Fre
character. Established land uses, although zoned for higher intensity and scales, utilize appropriate
infill that fits the existing context while achieving the community based vision for the future.



PROTECT Watkins
Areas designated for slow incremental growth strategies, smaller scale and lowest
intensity investments. *Housing investments examples: ADU’s, Tiny Homes, manufactured homes,
duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes.

Moderate Medium Medium

w t all
ge Low Hig
Slo Fas Sm Lar h


Rate of Change Scale of Change Intensity of Change

RIO SALADO
Page 386
ENHANCE
Areas designated for slow to moderate rate of growth strategies, medium scale and
medium intensity investments. *Housing investments examples: Courtyard Apartments,
Townhouses medium multiplex, live-work.

Moderate Medium Medium
COMMUNITY IDENTIFIED AREAS
all h
Slo t ge Low
w Fas Sm Lar Hig


Rate of Change Scale of Change Intensity of Change
N
INVEST
Areas designated for moderate rate of growth strategies, medium/large scale and
medium/high intensity investments. *Housing investments examples: Mid-rise apartments/
condos, Mixed Use Residential. 7th Ave LEGEND 3rd Ave 3rd St 7th St
Moderate
Elwood
Central Ave.
Medium Medium

w all
Protect Areas
t ge Low Hig
Slo Fas Sm Lar h
Enhance Areas
Rate of Change Scale of Change Intensity of Change
Invest Areas
122 VISION RIO SALADO VISION RIO SALADO 123
COMMUNITY IDENTIFIED AREAS
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



RIO SALADO AREA - COMMUNITY IDENTIFIED
AND PRIORITIZED INVESTMENTS Fre eway
I-17
The Rio Salado area has prioritized investments to reject displacement of existing residents
and businesses, while encouraging strategic and incremental growth respectful of the areas
existing character. The following map identifies the community identified and prioritized
investments associated with the Land Use, Housing and Economic Development planning
elements.
Watkins
Interstate Employment: Rio Salado Neighborhood:
G I G
• Infill and redevelopment of Complete Neighborhood.
employment and industrial uses. • Mixed-density housing types that
• Redevelopment of mid-rise, mixed increase in size near the Rio Salado
income residential along 7th Avenue transit stop.
and along the Rio Salado Greenway • Variety of mixed-income housing
(north side). opportunities, ownership and rental.

H Rio Salado Stop: J South Central Industrial:
Page 387 RIO SALADO
Mixed-Use transit stop • Infill and redevelopment of
• Variety of housing opportunities, employment and industrial uses.
ownership and rental, and affordable
and market costs, with support for
adjacent neighborhood.
• Retail, restaurants, service, small H
medical services, live/work space, N
ILLUSTRAIVE PLAN
hotel, movie theater and employment LEGEND
Buildings Parks / Open Space
/institutional uses to include business Point of Pride Existing Park Proposed Light Rail Station

Existing Building Proposed Park
cluster and learning center uses and 5 Minute Walks
Retrofit/Adaptive Reuse Building Community Gathering
public space. Proposed Building

• Mid- to High-rise development I J
(3-6 stories) in a walkable format –
buildings to the street, first floor entry
and parking behind the buildings, 7th Ave 3rd Ave 3rd St 7th St
height and intensity of development Elwood
Central Ave.
transitions to the future adjacent
neighborhood.




124 VISION RIO SALADO VISION RIO SALADO 125
ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



RIO SALADO AREA - LAND USE 2045
RIO SALADO AREA - LAND USE PRIORITIES re eway
I-17 F
Innovation and Cultural Gateway
The Rio Salado station area has evolved
into a vibrant mixture of culturally and
environmentally respectful industries;
inclusive of innovative and green
technologies, as well as expanded Watkins
LAND USE
quality work-force training and job
opportunities raising income levels for
all existing area residents. The Rio land LEGEND
Single-Family Residential Mixed-Use R
use mix is one of the most vibrant and LAND USE (Office, Resi
Multi-Family Residential
authentic new station areas creating an Retail
Mixed-Use Commercial
“Innovation and Cultural Gateway”. (Office & Retail) Industrial
LEGEND
Single-Family Residential Mixed-Use Residential
New development has been (Office, Residential & Retail)
Multi-Family Residential
acknowledged and celebrated as a local Retail
Mixed-Use Commercial
best practice example of sustainable (Office & Retail) Industrial
Page 388 RIO SALADO
design utilizing both indigenous and
contemporary approaches consistent
and respectful of natural resources,
rustic, and eco-friendly aesthetics, while
building upon the existing Nina Mason
Pulliam Rio Salado Audubon Center and
Rio Salado Habitat Restoration Area.
New and innovative flex industries,
tech businesses and learning clusters
have established themselves as strong
employment and service center full of
emerging and innovative technologies.

Land on the river banks has become
a vibrant hub of vital community 3rd St 7th St
7th Ave 3rd Ave
investments and diverse housing Elwood
Central Ave.
options bringing community wealth,
enhancements, and equitable prosperity
to all corridor residents and the region.


126 VISION RIO SALADO VISION RIO SALADO 127
LAND USE
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



RIO SALADO AREA - COMMUNITY IDENTIFIED
AND PRIORITIZED INVESTMENTS Fre eway
I-17
The Rio Salado area has prioritized investments to reject displacement of existing residents
and businesses, while encouraging strategic and incremental growth respectful of the areas
existing character. The following map identifies the community identified and prioritized
investments associated with the Health, Green Systems and Mobility planning elements.

Interstate Employment: Rio Salado Neighborhood: Watkins
G • Improve connectivity and access, for safety I Complete Neighborhood.
and comfort throughout the area, including • Walkable street network that provides G
under I-17 for automobiles and trucks as connectivity throughout the neighborhood and
well as pedestrians and cyclists. access to the Greenway and transit station
area.
Rio Salado Stop: • Design of network for safe pedestrian and
H Mixed-Use transit stop bicycle use and greening of the corridor for
• Rio Salado Greenway - direct pedestrian shade and comfort.
connectivity to the natural areas of the Rio • Active park space with a dog and skate park.
Salado. K
• Incorporation of park and festival space to
South Central Industrial:
support residents, visitors and businesses. J RIO SALADO
Page 389
• Improve connectivity and access, for
• Improvement to 3rd Avenue, 3rd Street,
safety and comfort throughout the area, for
Watkins Road, the Maricopa Parkway
automobiles and trucks as well as pedestrians
frontage, and Elwood for improved
and cyclists.
pedestrian and biking safety, connectivity
• Provide a direct connection to Central Avenue
and comfort – shade, green amenities and
and the New Rio Salado neighborhood to the
stormwater improvements. H
west.
• Improved connectivity to adjacent
employment centers. Rio Salado Greenway:
• Central Avenue - pedestrian enhancement K • Enhance the natural characteristics of the
to for safety and comfort, wider sidewalk, river and adjacent greenway as amenity for
shading – natural and man-made. the South Phoenix community and adjacent
development.
STREET NETWORK • Provide an improved trail network along the IN J
north and south sides of the greenway to
improve pedestrian and bicycle connectivity
across South Phoenix and improved access
LEGEND to the Central Avenue Corridor. Provide
7th Ave 3rd Ave 3rd St 7th St
opportunities for temporary (food trucks) or Elwood
Central Ave.
Existing Street small-scale retail along the trail network to
provide services and gathering spaces with
Proposed Street shade for users.
• Identify opportunities for water activities.
Multi-Modal Enhancements

128 VISION RIO SALADO VISION RIO SALADO 129
STREET NETWORK
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



RIO SALADO AREA - OPEN SPACE 2045
RIO SALADO AREA - OPEN SPACE PRIORITIES re eway
I-17 F
Nature’s Oasis
The Rio Salado area celebrates a well-
connected, enhanced, and publicly
accessible natural resource abundant in
gathering places and diverse recreation
opportunities for local and regional Watkins
guests.

The area has benefited from vastly
improved health for all residents and
workers. The immense tree canopy and
expansive Rio Salado habitat restoration
has resulted in cleaner air quality,
more recreation opportunities, stronger
ecological appreciation and awareness,
Page 390 all while combating urban heat island RIO SALADO
and excessive heat in the heart of the
south central corridor communities. This
green connected oasis has extended
arms both north and south as well as east
and west.

In particular, the newly constructed Del
Rio Redevelopment site at the north
west corner of 7th Street and Elwood
Street has positioned the south central
community with the largest and most
successful Agri-Food Innovation Center
in the Valley. From the Rio Salado PUBLIC SPACE
Station, residents and visitors have
several options to walk, bike, or travel via 3rd St 7th St
7th Ave 3rd Ave
safe, shaded, and protected bike lanes, Elwood
Central Ave.
LEGEND
sidewalks, and trails making the Agri-
Food Innovation Center a community hub Existing Public Spaces
for food innovation.
Proposed Public or Semi-Public Spaces

130 VISION RIO SALADO VISION RIO SALADO 131
PUBLIC SPACE
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



RIO SALADO AREA - CELEBRATING THE RIO
Activate the Edges Walkable Infill




Page 391
Activate the Edges - 10 year build out
Enhance the natural characteristics of the river and adjacent greenway as an amenity for the South Complete the Neighborhood
Phoenix community and adjacent development. Provide an improved trail network along the north
and south edges of the greenway to improve walking and biking access to the Central Avenue
Corridor. Provide opportunities for activities such as food trucks, small scale retail, and water
activities along a network of shaded gathering spaces.

Walkable Infill - 15 year build out
Larger to medium scale flex industries begin to fill in south of the Rio Salado Park Scenic Drive and
provide building form and definition supportive of a walkable employment center with enhanced
pedestrian scaled experiences, access, and connectivity. Larger employers and institutions bring
regional employment and service opportunities, breathing new life and activation to the area.

Complete the Neighborhood - 25 year build out
Additional neighborhood scaled infill maintains and enhances the established walkable street
network and provides even greater connectivity to the Rio. A variety of housing is provided at
various income levels providing equitable access to this regional employment and recreation hub.
Entertainment, restaurants and services are all within 15-minute walk to this prominent innovation The purpose of this Illustrative rendering is not to show development exactly as it will occur, but to provide visual guidance on
and cultural gateway to South Phoenix. community identified “priority sites” as it relates to the overall community vision, and to demonstrate a range of development scales
and intensity respectful of existing neighborhoods, parcels and block configurations, and to be consistent with adopted station area
“Place Types” to provide additional guidance for the application of the Walkable Urban form based code, where appropriate.

132 VISION RIO SALADO VISION RIO SALADO 133
WHAT WE WANT BUCKEYE
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



CELEBRATING THE RIO Lowell Elementary
In the year 2045 and building off existing programs and experiences, the Rio has greatly
School
BUCKEYE
enhanced public recreation and cultural amenities with new information kiosks, trails, and local
artwork now lining the edges of the Rio Salado providing an abundance of social, cultural, and
entertainment opportunities all while paying tribute and respect to the river and the people that
relied on its presence throughout Phoenix history. New activities and programming provide
Lowell Elementary
opportunities for all users, ages, and abilities to access and discover via culture and art walks,
School
birds and beer events, and pop up community markets. Rio Salado Park Drive has become
a major east - west safety corridor providing residents, businesses, and visitors access and
connectivity to this new highly desirable regional amenity while maintaining a pedestrian scaled
Lo-Lo’s Chicken &
experience for existing residents and locals.
Waffles
The purpose of this Illustrative rendering is not to show development exactly as it will occur, but to provide visual guidance on
community identified “priority sites” as it relates to the overall community vision, and to demonstrate a range of development scales
and intensity respectful of existing neighborhoods, parcels and block configurations, and to be consistent with adopted station area
“Place Types” to provide additional guidance for the application of the Walkable Urban form based code, where appropriate.

Lo-Lo’s Chicken &
Waffles

NINA MASON
Page 392 PULLIAM RIO SALADO
AUDOBON CENTER

FULLERFORM (EST. 1947) LEGEND
Buildings
Point of Pride

Existing Building

Retrofit/Adaptive Reuse Building
LEGEND
Buildings Proposed
Parks / Open SpaceBuilding
Point of Pride Existing Park

Existing Building Proposed Park

Retrofit/Adaptive Reuse Building Community Gathering

Proposed Building




134 VISION RIO SALADO VISION RIO SALADO 135
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




SOUTH AREA
STRENGTHEN TRADITIONS AND CULTURE
Page 393



2045 COMMUNITY VISION
The South Area is a vibrant connected environment that strengthens and prioritizes families, youth,
and protecting the most vulnerable populations while inspiring all future generations to live, work,
and thrive in place. With rich traditions to share, the community is a place to celebrate and share
history, heritage, and cultural diversity with all who visit.

Specifically for this area, our community envisions:
• Protecting our residents most at risk from displacement, including those residing in our existing
trailer parks
• Providing quality work-force training and job matching opportunities within our corridor to
prevent the displacement and build community wealth
• Providing diverse mixed-income and equitable housing options that cater to a dynamic range of
family make-ups and that are designed respectful of existing neighborhoods
• Urban agriculture – telling the history of the people and land and the future with healthy food
• Managed growth with unique investments at each light rail station stop driven by the need of
local neighborhoods and desired by visitors to the corridor
• Parking solutions that balance business needs with residential neighborhood quality of life



136 VISION SOUTH VISION SOUTH 137
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THEREElwood RESOURCES



SOUTH AREA - PRIORITIZING GROWTH
The South area has prioritized growth to reject displacement of existing residents and businesses,
RIO SALADO
Southgate
while encouraging strategic and incremental growth respectful of the areas existing character.
Established neighborhoods and commercial sites, fill in with appropriately scaled housing and land
use while achieving the community based vision for the future.

Broadway
PROTECT
Areas designated for slow incremental growth strategies, smaller scale and lowest
intensity investments. *Housing investments examples: ADU’s, Tiny Homes, manufactured homes,
duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes.

Moderate Medium Medium

w t all
ge Low Hig
Slo Fas Sm Lar h Cody

Rate of Change Scale of Change Intensity of Change
Roeser
Page 394
ENHANCE
Areas designated for slow to moderate rate of growth strategies, medium scale and
medium intensity investments. *Housing investments examples: Courtyard Apartments,
Townhouses medium multiplex, live-work.
Sunland
Moderate Medium Medium COMMUNITY IDENTIFIED AREAS
all h
Slo t ge Low
w Fas Sm Lar Hig

N
Rate of Change Scale of Change Intensity of Change
Southern
INVEST
Areas designated for moderate rate of growth strategies, medium/large scale and LEGEND
medium/high intensity investments. *Housing investments examples: Mid-rise apartments/ Protect Areas
condos, Mixed Use Residential.
Enhance Areas 7th St
Moderate Medium Medium
Invest Areas
w t all
ge Low Hig
Slo Fas Sm Lar h


Rate of Change Scale of Change Intensity of Change
7th Ave 3rd Ave Central Ave. 3rd St
138 VISION SOUTH VISION SOUTH
Vineyard 139
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THEREElwood RESOURCES



SOUTH AREA - COMMUNITY IDENTIFIED N
AND PRIORITIZED INVESTMENTS
O
Southgate
The Rio Salado area has prioritized investments to reject displacement of existing residents
and businesses, while encouraging strategic and incremental growth respectful of the areas
existing character. The following map identifies the community identified and prioritized
investments associated with the Land Use, Housing and Economic Development planning L Broadway
elements.

Broadway Stop: Roeser Stop:
L Mixed-Use transit stop P Mixed-Use transit stop
• Variety of housing opportunities, ownership • Variety of mixed-income housing
N
and rental, live/work space at affordable opportunities, ownership and rental.
and market costs. • Retail, restaurants and daily service – N
• Retail, restaurants and daily service – entertainment, office, grocery store, farmer’s
entertainment, office, arcade, grocery store market and library. Cody
and farmer’s market. • Mid-rise development (2-4 stories) in a Q
• Community Facilities – community learning walkable, connected format – buildings to
/ training center, medical facilities – the street, first floor entry and parking behind
pharmacy, urgent care, etc. the buildings. Roeser
Page 395
• Mid-rise development (2-5 stories) in a
P
walkable, connected format – buildings Mobile Home Park:
to the street, first floor entry and parking Q • Preserve and stabilize the mobile home
behind the buildings. park as a low-cost housing opportunity
Ed Pastor Transit Plaza: for future residents.
Enhanced Transit Center • Investigate opportunities to create Sunland
• Provide mixed-income housing, focused on ownership opportunities within the mobile N
attainable and affordable units adjacent to home park.
the transit center. N
Southern Stop:
South Neighborhoods:
R
N Mixed-Use transit stop
• Housing revitalization and infill of vacant • Variety of mixed-income housing
lots with of a size appropriate for the opportunities, ownership and rental. Southern
neighborhood. • Retail, restaurants and daily service –
entertainment, hotel, Mercado, and farmer’s
market. R
7th Street Neighborhood:
O • Mid-rise development (2-4 stories) in a 7th Ave
• Expansion of neighborhood to provide 3rd Ave 7th St
walkable, connected format – buildings to
new, mixed-income housing opportunities,
the street, first floor entry and parking behind
including single family, multi-generational
the buildings. N
ILLUSTRAIVE PLAN
and small-scale multi-unit homes. LEGEND
• Low-rise mixed-use development, located Buildings Parks / Open Space
Point of Pride Existing Park Proposed Light Rail Station
at the corner of 7th Street and Broadway
Existing Building Proposed Park
Road to support daily needs of residents. 5 Minute Walks
Retrofit/Adaptive Reuse Building Community Gathering Q
Proposed Building 3rd St
Central Ave.
140 VISION SOUTH VISION SOUTH
Vineyard 141
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THEREElwood RESOURCES



SOUTH AREA - LAND USE 2045
SOUTH AREA - LAND USE PRIORITIES Southgate
Tri-Center South
Three mixed use transit nodes have
blossomed in the south area creating
some of the most unique and culturally Broadway
diverse experiences in the entire corridor.
Surrounding these nodes, protected and
enhanced established neighborhoods
continue to thrive providing appropriately
scaled affordable and mixed-income
housing choices. Revitalization and
LAND USE N
infill of vacant lots have “completed”
the neighborhood edges at appropriate Cody
scales and intensities. Existing and new LEGEND
Single-Family Residential Mixed-Use Residential
businesses thrive, mobile home parks are LAND USE
Multi-Family Residential
E
(Office, Residential & Retail)
S N
stabilized and protected, and ownership Retail
U
Mixed-Use Commercial D Roeser
Page 396 opportunities have been created for LEGEND (Office & Retail) N Industrial
all residents. New retail, restaurants, Single-Family Residential Mixed-Use Residential LA
(Office, Residential & Retail)
and entertainment complement the Multi-Family Residential
Retail
existing businesses and provide more Mixed-Use Commercial
(Office & Retail) Industrial
capacity to support the meaningful and
respectful growth of the area. Education, Sunland
community centered learning, and
civic leadership are strong and vibrant
throughout this area. Youth opportunities
and empowerment programming
have expanded to influence nearby
neighborhoods and communities as Southern
one of the most authentic art, culture,
and ethnic heritage hubs in the entire
valley. The area has given birth to
several local developers, innovators,
and entrepreneurs, cultivating community
pride, success and resiliency like no
other. The South Area shines as the
heart of the corridor and South Mountain
Village Primary Core. 7th St
7th Ave 3rd Ave Central Ave. 3rd St
142 VISION SOUTH VISION SOUTH
Vineyard 143
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THEREElwood RESOURCES



SOUTH AREA - COMMUNITY IDENTIFIED N
AND PRIORITIZED INVESTMENTS
O
Southgate
The South Area has prioritized investments to reject displacement of existing residents
and businesses, while encouraging strategic and incremental growth respectful of the areas
existing character. The following map identifies the community identified and prioritized
investments associated with the Health, Green Systems and Mobility planning elements. Broadway
L
Broadway Stop: Roeser Stop:
L Mixed-Use transit stop
P Mixed-Use transit stop
• Green Space – improvements to local parks and • Green Space – improvements to local parks and
green spaces – active uses, open space, dog park, green spaces – active uses, open space, dog park, N
stormwater retention area, and greening of streets stormwater retention area, and greening of streets –
– streetscape, green amenities and gathering streetscape, green amenities and gathering spaces.
spaces. • Roeser Road Improvements – create a Paseo to N
• Broadway Road Improvements – safety create a pedestrian oriented street, incorporating
improvements, bike and pedestrian improvements safety improvements, bike and pedestrian Cody
– wider sidewalks and bike lanes, and greening of improvements – wider sidewalks and bike lanes,
the corridor for shade and comfort. and greening of the corridor for shade and comfort.
• Central Avenue - pedestrian enhancement to for • Central Avenue - pedestrian enhancement to for
safety and comfort, wider sidewalk, shading – safety and comfort, wider sidewalk, shading –
natural and man-made. natural and man-made.
Roeser
Page 397
Ed Pastor Transit Plaza:
P
Enhanced Transit Center Southern Stop:
• Create a Paseo for the community – comfort
R Mixed-Use transit stop
amenities for people – shade, seating, water • South Mountain Community Center – enhanced
fountains, trash receptacles, etc. recreation space, active recreation areas, passive
• Improve pedestrian and bicycle connectivity to the recreation space that incorporates shade, seating,
water and landscape. Create a community learning
Sunland
transit center – complete sidewalk network and
bike lanes. / training center for South corridor residents. N
• Improvement to 3rd Avenue, 3rd Street, Southern
South Neighborhoods: Avenue, and Vineyard Road for improved N
N • Improvement to 3rd Avenue/Montezuma Street, pedestrian and biking safety, connectivity and
3rd Street, Broadway Road, Cody Drive, Roeser comfort – shade, green amenities and stormwater
Road, Sunland Avenue, Southern Avenue, improvements. STREET NETWORK
Alta Vista Road, Vineyard Road for improved • Green Space – improvements to local parks and Southern
pedestrian and biking safety, connectivity and green spaces – active uses, open space, dog park,
comfort – shade, green amenities and stormwater stormwater retention area, and greening of streets – LEGEND
improvements. streetscape, green amenities and gathering spaces. Existing Street
• Improvement of existing parks and green spaces to • Southern Avenue Improvements – create a green Proposed Street
support neighborhoods. – active uses, community street, incorporating safety improvements, bike and
R
gardens space, open/green space and public art. Multi-Modal Enhancements
pedestrian improvements – wider sidewalks and
bike lanes, and greening of the corridor for shade
7th Street Neighborhood: and comfort.
O • New and improved green spaces to support the • Central Avenue - pedestrian enhancement to for
existing residential community and new housing safety and comfort, wider sidewalk, shading –
development. Pedestrian comfort improvements to natural and man-made.
5th Street to support development and connectivity. 7th St
7th Ave 3rd Ave Central Ave. 3rd St
144 VISION SOUTH VISION SOUTH
Vineyard 145
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THEREElwood RESOURCES



SOUTH AREA - OPEN SPACE 2045
SOUTH AREA - OPEN SPACE PRIORITIES Southgate
Southern Oasis
The South area found a striking balance
between development, growth and
preservation, building upon community Broadway
authenticy and strengthening its unique
geographic position between South
Mountain and the Rio Salado. Access
to green spaces, recreation, mobility,
and community health choices are now
sprinkled throughout a robust connected
network of publicly accessible green
spaces and seamlessly integrated into Cody
established neighborhoods. This new
found equitable access for all new and
existing residents has nurtured community
Roeser
Page 398 awareness, participation, and leadership.
Residents health and activities have
improved with new, unique, and various
opportunities for passive and active
recreation for all ages and abilities.
Children now walk comfortably and Sunland
safely to school and nearby amenities,
Neighborhoods have established
walking groups, several “shared streets”,
and community festivals throughout the
year. Employees are also building off
the southern oasis with retail, restaurants, PUBLIC SPACE Southern N
and commercial activation of green civic
spaces along major arterial streets such
LEGEND
as Broadway Road, Roeser Road, and
Existing Public Spaces
Southern Avenue.
Proposed Public or Semi-Public Spaces




7th St
7th Ave 3rd Ave Central Ave. 3rd St
146 VISION SOUTH VISION SOUTH
Vineyard 147
WHAT WE WANT
ROADWAY
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES
Lowell Elementary
School
SOUTH AREA - BROADWAY STATION 2045
Lo-Lo’s Chicken &
The purpose of this Illustrative rendering is not to show development exactly as it will occur, but to provide visual guidance on
Waffles
community identified “priority sites” as it relates to the overall community vision, and to demonstrate a range of development scales
and intensity respectful of existing neighborhoods, parcels and block configurations, and to be consistent with adopted station area
“Place Types” to provide additional guidance for the application of the Walkable Urban form based code, where appropriate.



Lo-Lo’s Chicken &
Waffles
ED PASTOR
TRANSIT CENTER



LEGEND
Buildings
TRAVIS L. WILLIAMS Point of Pride
FAMILY SERVICES
CENTER Existing Building
Page 399
Retrofit/Adaptive Reuse Building
LEGEND
Buildings Proposed
Parks / Open SpaceBuilding
Point of Pride Existing Park

Existing Building Proposed Park

Retrofit/Adaptive Reuse Building Community Gathering

Proposed Building

STRENGTHENING BROADWAY
In the year 2045, Broadway station area provides a variety of mixed income housing
opportunities for ownership, rental, and live/work at various scales and intensities respectful
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF
of existing neighborhoods. Mixed Use store fronts, outdoor dining, and the occasional
ECONOMIC SECURITY
plazas all provide visual definition and character to the Central Avenue and Broadway Road
pedestrian experience. Community facilities remain active and heavily used providing a variety
of community learning, job training, and daily services. Ed Pastor Transit Center has been
ESPIRITU CHARTER adaptively reused as a local small business cultivator and creative/maker space providing art,
SCHOOL culture, business and technology resources. Strong, safe, shaded pedestrian connections east
to Nuevo Park and west to Harmon Park have allowed Broadway to become a well traveled
family/kid friendly neighborhood daily walking amenity.

148 VISION SOUTH VISION SOUTH 149
Catholic Parish Central Park
OESER WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES
n&
fles
SOUTH AREA - ROESER STATION 2045
Central Park

ROESER CULTURAL CENTER ARIZONA
In 2045, the Roeser station area has become a local/small business corridor building off the DEPARTMENT
several existing narrow lot commercial properties abutting established single family residential. OF ECONOMIC
Businesses have embraced the pedestrian experience, shifting surface parking lots to behind SECURITY
buildings and providing functional and shaded outdoor dining, seating and gathering space
along the Central Avenue frontage. Larger developments have contributed with shared parking
models, small scale infill, and active and accessible frontages along Central Avenue to further
embrace and display vibrant and active people, community, traditions and cultures. ESPIRITU
LEGEND
CHARTER
Buildings Parks / Open Space SCHOOL
Point of Pride Existing Park
N
Proposed Light Rail Station

Existing Building Proposed Park

Retrofit/Adaptive Reuse Building Community Gathering

Proposed MARY’S MINISTRIES
Parks / Open SpaceBuilding
Existing Park
N
Page 400 Proposed Light Rail Station

Proposed Park

Community Gathering


FAMILY DOLLAR


PHOENIX FIRE
DEPARTMENT
STATION 72



ASU PREP ACADEMY




The purpose of this Illustrative rendering is not to show development exactly as it will occur, but to provide visual guidance on
community identified “priority sites” as it relates to the overall community vision, and to demonstrate a range of development scales
and intensity respectful of existing neighborhoods, parcels and block configurations, and to be consistent with adopted station area
“Place Types” to provide additional guidance for the application of the Walkable Urban form based code, where appropriate.


150 VISION SOUTH VISION SOUTH 151
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS
SOUTHERN INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



SOUTH AREA - SOUTHERN STATION 2045

OCOTILLO LIBRARY & ASU PREP ACADEMY
WORKFORCE LITERACY CENTER



SOUTH PLAZA




SAINT
CATHERINE
OF SIENNA RANCH MARKET
ROMAN
Page 401 CATHOLIC
CHURCH
BUILDING ON SOUTHERN TRADITIONS
In 2045, the Southern Avenue station is strongly built upon South Plaza, a community node
and cultural marker established over time. South Plaza has become an even greater iconic
landmark enhanced with shade, lighting, and intentional community gathering spaces;
revitalized with small businesses, and celebrated as an equitable TOD landmark site. Infill of
the surface lot is appropriately designed and scaled to complement the small businesses and
CORRAL CLEANERS & LAUNDRY plaza experience. This Southern stop has become a common community destination full of
vibrant mixed income housing, retail, and restaurants all breathing new life in the heart of south
central. Art, culture, and ethnic heritage elements are sprinkled throughout celebrating and
GINO’S PIZZA sharing stories of the past, present, and future.

The purpose of this Illustrative rendering is not to show development exactly as it will occur, but to provide visual guidance on
ADVANCE U
community identified “priority sites” as it relates to the overall community vision, and to demonstrate a range of development scales
adopted station area
and intensity respectful of existing neighborhoods, parcels and block configurations, and to be consistent with ELEMENTARY
“Place Types” to provide additional guidance for the application of the Walkable Urban form based code, where appropriate.
SAINT CATHERINE
OF SIENNA
CATHOLIC SCHOOL
SOUTH MOUNTAIN
COMMUNITY
CENTER
152 VISION SOUTH VISION SOUTH 153
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




SOUTH MOUNTAIN AREA
HEALTH AND RECREATION HUB
Page 402



2045 COMMUNITY VISION
The South Mountain area is a community hub for health and recreation investments. The green
infrastructure along the canal banks and to South Mountain Park, connects people in affordable
housing and mixed income residential neighborhoods to improved health and healthcare jobs.

Specifically for this area, our community envisions:
• Providing safe, shaded, and convenient walking paths
• Urban agriculture – telling the history of the people and land and the future with healthy food
• Resources and active places to promote safety at the end of the light rail line
• Easy connection between the last light rail stop and the mountain (bike lanes, shaded sidewalks,
circulator)




154 VISION SOUTH MTN VISION SOUTH MTN 155
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



SOUTH MOUNTAIN AREA - PRIORITIZING GROWTH
The South Mountain area has prioritized growth to reject displacement of existing residents and
businesses, while encouraging strategic and incremental growth respectful of the areas existing
character. Established neighborhoods utilize appropriate housing typologies that fit the existing Vineyard
context while achieving the community based vision for the future.
RIO SALADO




PROTECT 3rd Ave
Areas designated for slow incremental growth strategies, smaller scale and lowest
intensity investments. *Housing investments examples: ADU’s, Tiny Homes, manufactured homes,
duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes.
Fremont
Moderate Medium Medium

w t all
ge Low Hig
Slo Fas Sm Lar h Western Canal
Rate of Change Scale of Change Intensity of Change

Page 403
ENHANCE Baseline
Areas designated for slow to moderate rate of growth strategies, medium scale and
medium intensity investments. *Housing investments examples: Courtyard Apartments,
Townhouses medium multiplex, live-work.

Moderate Medium Medium
all h
Slo t ge Low
w Fas Sm Lar Hig
Jesse Owens
Rate of Change Scale of Change Intensity of Change COMMUNITY IDENTIFIED AREAS Highland Canal
INVEST
Areas designated for moderate rate of growth strategies, medium/large scale and N
medium/high intensity investments. *Housing investments examples: Mid-rise apartments/ 7th St
condos, Mixed Use Residential. 7th Ave
LEGEND South Mountain Ave
Central Ave.
Moderate Medium Medium

w t all Protect Areas
ge Low Hig
Slo Fas Sm Lar h
COMMUNITY IDENTIFIED AREAS
Enhance Areas

Rate of Change Scale of Change Intensity of Change Invest Areas

156 VISION SOUTH MTN VISION SOUTH MTN 157
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



SOUTH MOUNTAIN AREA - COMMUNITY
IDENTIFIED AND PRIORITIZED INVESTMENTS
The South Mountain Area has prioritized investments to reject displacement of existing residents Vineyard
and businesses, while encouraging strategic and incremental growth respectful of the areas
existing character. The following map identifies the community identified and prioritized
investments associated with the Land Use, Housing and Economic Development planning
elements. 3rd Ave
V
Baseline Stop
T W Highland Canal
Mixed-use transit stop. • Create a higher-intensity, mixed-
• Variety of mixed-income housing income neighborhood, with new Fremont
opportunities, ownership and rental. green spaces, and that supports
• Retail, restaurants, office and daily the adjacent neighborhood and is V
service – entertainment, movie connected to the Baseline Corridor
theater, bowling alley, Mercado by the street network and improved
UWestern Canal
(corner grocery store), farmer’s canal.
market, cultural attractions and live/ T
Page 404
work space. Baseline
• Mid-rise development (2-5 stories)
X Employment Center
in a walkable, connected format –
• Office park setting that incorporates
buildings to the street, first floor entry
job opportunities for the community X
and parking behind the buildings.
and a specific focus on medical uses. V
Within the park setting an opportunity
U Western Canal for festival space and gatherings is
• Mid-rise (up to 5 stories) mixed- incorporated. Jesse Owens
use development centered on Jesse
Owens Parkway. Highland Canal
• Variety of mixed-income housing
opportunities, ownership and rental. W
• Retail, restaurants, and daily service
uses with offices including medical V 7th St
offices and educational spaces.
7th Ave
South Mountain Ave
Central Ave.
V South Mountain Neighborhoods N
ILLUSTRAIVE PLAN
• Housing revitalization and infill LEGEND
Buildings Parks / Open Space
vacant lots with of a size appropriate Point of Pride Existing Park Proposed Light Rail Station ILLUSTRAVIE PLAN
for the neighborhood. Existing Building Proposed Park
5 Minute Walks
Retrofit/Adaptive Reuse Building Community Gathering

Proposed Building
N
158 VISION SOUTH MTN VISION SOUTH MTN 159
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



SOUTH MOUNTAIN AREA - LAND USE 2045
SOUTH MOUNTAIN AREA - LAND USE PRIORITIES
Employment/Entertainment Hub
The Baseline station area provides new
regionally accessible mixed income Vineyard
housing, retail, restaurants and ample
new job opportunities in health and
healthcare related industries. This
Regional Corridor destination now
has an established gateway presence
3rd Ave
and campus-like walkable urban form
with increased development intensity
showcasing a playful connected mid-
rise mixed-use destinations radiating
Fremont
around Jesse Owens Parkway. New
entertainment uses bring activities like Western Canal
bowling, movie theaters, music and
Page 405 attractions for residents of all ages,
cultures, and ethnicities. Activated
canal frontages provide additional
entrepreneurial opportunities for Baseline
local residents, as well as weekend
food, art, and community gathering
events. Neighborhood scaled retail
and educational spaces join the list of
amenities for locals improving access
to daily services and community
resources. An abundance of sit down Jesse Owens
restaurants and retail have filled Central
Avenue creating a unique “main street”
Highland Canal
destination with convenient parking
facilities allowing visitors a “park once”
experience. New mixed income housing,
flexible live work units, and small to 7th Ave 7th St
medium scaled multifamily appropriately
infill neighborhood edges providing all South Mountain Ave
Central Ave.
residents new housing options.

LAND USE
160 VISION SOUTH MTN VISION SOUTH MTN 161
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



SOUTH MOUNTAIN AREA - COMMUNITY
IDENTIFIED AND PRIORITIZED INVESTMENTS
The South Mountain Area has prioritized investments to reject displacement of existing residents Vineyard
and businesses, while encouraging strategic and incremental growth respectful of the areas
existing character. The following map identifies the community identified and prioritized
investments associated with the Health, Green Systems and Mobility planning elements.
3rd Ave
Baseline Stop South Mountain Neighborhoods V
T Mixed-use transit stop.
V • Improvement to 3rd Avenue, Vineyard
• Local Transit – improved local bus/ Road, Jesse Owens Parkway and
transit stops, park & ride lot, urban Olympic Drive for improved pedestrian Fremont
circulator bus along the Baseline and biking safety, connectivity and
Corridor and adjacent neighborhoods. comfort – shade, green amenities and
• Improvement to Baseline Road, Central stormwater improvements.
V
Avenue, Jesse Owens Parkway and • Improvement of existing parks UWestern Canal
Western Canal for improved pedestrian and green spaces to support
and biking safety, connectivity and neighborhoods. – active uses,
comfort – shade, green amenities and community gardens space, open/green T
Page 406
stormwater improvements. space and public art. Baseline
• Green Space – improvements to local
parks and green spaces – active uses, W Highland Canal
• Canal Improvements – improved canals
open space, dog park, stormwater
to create better connectivity, recreational X
retention area, and greening of streets
and gathering spaces for residents and
– streetscape, green amenities and V
visitors.
STREET Create green canal-scapes that
NETWORK
gathering spaces.
provide shaded pathways and gathering
• Baseline Road Improvements – create
areas for users. Jesse Owens
a green street, incorporating safety
improvements, bike and pedestrian Employment Center
improvements – wider sidewalks and X Highland Canal
• Office park setting that incorporate job
bike lanes, and greening of the corridor opportunities for the community and a
for shade and comfort. specific
N focus on medical uses. Within the
W
park setting an opportunity for festival V
U Western Canal space and gatherings is incorporated.
7th St
• Canal Improvements – improved
7th Ave
canals to create better connectivity, LEGEND South Mountain Ave
Central Ave.
recreational and gathering spaces for
Existing Street
residents and visitors. Create green
canal-scapes that provide shaded Proposed Street STREET NETWORK
pathways and gathering areas for users.
Multi-Modal Enhancements


162 VISION SOUTH MTN VISION SOUTH MTN 163
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



SOUTH MOUNTAIN AREA - OPEN SPACE 2045
SOUTH MOUNTAIN AREA - OPEN SPACE PRIORITIES
Walk the Walk
The South Mountain area is a walker’s
paradise. Western and Highline canal
improvements including trees, art, and
Vineyard
multi-use trails ensure that every resident
in this area is within a 10 minute walk
of publicly accessible green spaces,
outdoor gathering areas, and/or
3rd Ave
people friendly active transportation
infrastructure. Established neighborhoods
and residents benefit with shortened block
patterns, conveniently located paseos
Fremont
and pedestrian ways, and shared streets
connecting to a variety of trails in the Western Canal
area, including nearby South Mountain
Page 407 Park Preserve. Improvement to several
major streets prioritized enhancements for
pedestrian and biking experiences, and
provided more comfort through shade Baseline
and green amenities. Local parks and
green spaces support neighborhoods by
providing active uses, open space, dog
parks, community gardens, public art,
and heat relief amenities such as splash
pads and cooling stations. The new
employment hub and office park along Jesse Owens
Jesse Owens Parkway also provide larger,
community space for festivals, markets,
Highland Canal
and community gathering events in an
amphitheater style and park like setting.

7th Ave 7th St
South Mountain Ave
Central Ave.

PUBLIC SPACE
164 VISION SOUTH MTN VISION SOUTH MTN 165
ASELINE WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



SOUTH MOUNTAIN AREA - BASELINE STATION 2045

PONCHO’S MEXICAN
HEALTH AND RECREATION HUB FOOD AND CANTINA
In the year 2045, the Baseline Station area offers a variety of mixed income housing,
ownership, and rental choices. The area prides itself in facilitating a grand entry into the
South Central Corridor with an abundance of shaded walking and bicycling paths connecting
the “Mountain to the River”. Residents have a multitude of convenient options for healthy
lifestyle choices, entertainment and gatherings. Newly established and innovative community
health resource centers, recreation options, and publicly accessible plazas have enhanced
the vibrancy of commercial and entertainment spaces. Locally owned small businesses and AZUKAR COFFEE
art galleries now sprinkle the Western and Highline canals, as well as Central Avenue with
authentic community places and experiences.

The purpose of this Illustrative rendering is not to show development exactly as it will occur, but to provide visual guidance on
community identified “priority sites” as it relates to the overall community vision, and to demonstrate a range of development scales
and intensity respectful of existing neighborhoods, parcels and block configurations, and to be consistent with adopted station area
“Place Types” to provide additional guidance for the application of the Walkable Urban form based code, where appropriate.

Page 408



MESQUITE


NFL YET COLLEGE
PREP ACADEMY

MOUNTAIN PARK
HEALTH CENTER


SOUTH POINTS
JUNIOR HIGH



SOUTH POINTS
HIGH SCHOOL CHAMPION SCHOOLS
SOUTH MOUNTAIN


166 VISION SOUTH MTN VISION SOUTH MTN 167
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



SOUTH MOUNTAIN AREA - CANALSCAPE 2045

SOUTH CENTRAL CANALSCAPE
In 2045, the canalscape has transformed to major bike and pedestrian corridors that safely
connect South Central to regional destinations, including South Mountain Park and Preserve
and the Rio Salado. The canals enhance the corridor’s sense of place thanks to the celebrations
of arts, foods, and culture taking place and paying tribute to the historic value of life supporting
water resources. Public art along the banks communicates Phoenix’s rich history and cultural
pride. Shaded walkways and activated building frontages provide a pleasant strolling
environment that breathes new life into these great amenities. Vendors with their crafts, food,
and art brighten up the canal on weekends, and health is promoted with health advocates and
organizations celebrating this new community health amenity the health benefits that come from
a more active lifestyle.




Page 409




168 VISION SOUTH MTN VISION SOUTH MTN 169
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




PART 4 HOW WE
GET THERE



Transitioning the current
conditions to the vision through
policy support, community
involvement, interdisciplinary
collaboration, capacity
building, partnerships, and
Page 410
outcome driven performance
measures for transparency
and accountability.




“South Phoenix has many people that have lived there for a
long time and has raised a lot of families. The policy plan
is a living document and it will have to continue to provide
respect and dignity for every resident in the Corridor.

PETRA FALCON, PROMISE ARIZONA

South Central TOD Grant Team


170 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 171
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES

Neighborhood Character
The ‘look and feel of an area’, especially when its
residential areas are already defined and built-out.
The way that character is regulated varies from
place to place, for instance, a residential historic
neighborhood is regulated differently than other
residential developments in order to preserve its
more prominent architectural and historic elements.
There are many elements that help define the
character of an area, such as, but not limited to:
block structure, parcel configurations, alleyways,
build to lines, setbacks, frontage standards, open
space standards, parking standards, building
Ed Pastor Transit Center and public plaza heights, allowed uses, and lot coverages.

The public right-of-way which consists
of sidewalks and landscape areas
SOUTH CENTRAL CORRIDOR (streetscape), and alleyways, are additional Newly constructed straw bale construction
elements that help define the character of a duplex in the Grant Park Neighborhood
“CHARACTER AREAS” ASSESSMENT neighborhood while providing linkages that create
Page 411
the connectivity between the residents and their
wider community. Understanding the streetscape
Introduction in the context of it’s neighborhood can provide
Form-Based Codes, such as the Walkable Urban Code, are known to connect the complex physical guidance on how to improve the function and
environment to standards that can be adjusted for each individual context, or character area, performance towards safer, healthier, and more
while providing the restorative potential of time tested pedestrian oriented forms of urbanism. The equitable streetscapes that are context sensitive.
following sections provide several foundational topics for further evaluation and guidance towards
the research and refinement of regulatory (required) South Central Corridor “Character Area” By understanding the neighborhood character or
development standards to be incorporated into the city’s Walkable Urban (WU) Code (Chapter ‘form’ of an area and its development patterns,
13) of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. These sections also provide interim guidance on zoning and along with an understanding of the community
entitlement requests within the South Central Corridor to be respectful and consistent with the South based vision; development partners can utilize
Central Corridors’ community-based vision to “Reject Displacement”. urban design best practices to provide guidance
for the future of the corridor. Urban design best
Subsequent research and analysis is needed prior to amending the Walkable Urban Code to practice standards, when applied consistently as
include South Central Corridor “Character Area” standards. While best practice urban design zoning and development standards, will provide
principles and development standards provide extensive guidance for new development and guidance for new development that, while new
community revitalization, their are existing legal constraints, property rights, and other regulatory and perhaps different in architectural design,
barriers that must also be considered. To that end, the implementation strategies, policies, and can still be respectful, inclusive, and compatible
actions in the next section provide additional guidance, tools, resources, and partnerships to realize with the existing character of a neighborhood, Existing “large lot” residence with uniquely deep
the full transformative opportunities the community seeks to achieve their vision. help maximize the potential for community front setbacks in the Roosevelt East Subdivision
revitalization, and enhance existing services and
businesses for longtime residents.
172 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 173
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES


What does DENSITY got to do with it? Sample Building and Housing
Sometimes, concerns over density might ADUs – The Benefits of Accessory Dwelling Units
Typology Considerations: One housing typology that is worth focusing on is Accessory dwelling units (ADUs). ADUs are
be less about the density and more about
the scale or massing that certain building defined by HUD as “accessory apartments, second units, or granny flats — are additional living
typologies appear imposing, out of place, quarters on single-family lots that are independent of the primary dwelling unit. The separate living
and uninviting to residents, pedestrians, or spaces are equipped with kitchen and bathroom facilities, and can be either attached or detached
to the established or desired “character”. A from the main residence. This housing typology can be instrumental in achieving several of the
building typology with appropriate “in-scale” vision outcomes for South Central. An Accessory dwelling units (ADUs) program can be one of
frontages standards on the ground floor and Multi-generational/ADU Duplex - Single Story the tools that begin addressing appropriately scaled housing in South Central’s single-family and
other site and lot development standards multi-family residential areas. In addition to offering housing alternatives for extended families and
can help minimize building massing, while elderly family members, ADUs offer a variety of other benefits:
providing architectural variety and detailing. • Affordable housing option for renters
Such standards can be used to promote • Neighborhood stabilization and gentle density increase in residential neighborhoods
neighborhood and “character” compatibility, • Cost less than a new home in a separate lot: Infrastructure/utilities in place
regardless of architectural styles. While • Homeowners can offset building costs with income from their rental unit
Duplex - Two Story Multi-Unit House
there is a lot of discussion about appropriate • Additional income for families and individuals
building types, the traditional building • Increase social capital and property value
structure in walkable communities commonly • New residents increase the customer base for nearby businesses and services
occurs as rectangles or squares as shown in • Improve alleyway safety
the samples to the right. ADU programs have been adopted in many cities due to lack of rental options and to assist low
Page 412 income communities in providing for affordable housing, increase income opportunities, and in
The key is how the Building Frontage Courtyard Housing Townhouse/Rowhouse proximity to transit. Further discussion on the opportunity to allow for ADUs in South Central is
+ Streetscape are designed: A building’s found in the “Residential Character Assessment“ section on the following pages.
appearance can be dramatically altered
with the addition of porches, windows, roof ADU Program Case Studies
details or the alteration of a roof line. Good Oregon and California have been in the forefront of ADU programs precisely due to these
design can reduce the apparent size of a issues, but even more importantly, cities such Seattle, WA, and Encinitas, San Diego, Danvielle
building, allowing it to “fit” in with existing Live/Work Small Multi-family and San Jose, CA, with the help of design firms, have developed pre-approved ADU plans free
established neighborhood character. of charge to be used by the public. The architectural plans include all the necessary plumbing,
Although the Walkable Urban (WU) Code utilities, structural openings, and core living components for all the proposed ADUs and come
and its Transects (urban zoning districts) in a variety of sizes. The free ‘approved plans’ which are also ‘permit ready’, and for low and
provide specific guidance on frontages, they moderate income families, this program not only provides certainty, but it offers a great deal
were created to address the needs of vibrant of savings in addition to expediting the approval process. Most cities also offer ‘amnesty’
mixed-use light rail corridors where increased programs for units that were constructed without permits - the units must be brought up to current
Small Commercial Small Mixed-Use building and fire codes.
intensity and scale of development is desired.
Per the South Central Corridor vision
to “reject displacement”, not all areas One of the best examples is the city of Encinitas “Housing for Generations” program. The
desire a dramatic rate of change in free architectural ADU plans offered, from two different design firms, range from studios to
scale and intensity, especially where 3-bedrooms, and are available to be downloaded from the Encinitas website, free of charge to
established residential character the public. In addition, Encinitas also offers a complete guide to building ADUS and an amnesty
already exists. Medium Mixed-Use Large Mixed-Use for existing/non-permitted ADUs.
174 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 175
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES

The Grant Park Neighborhood (Montgomery Addition, 1894), one of the oldest subdivisions
RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER ASSESSMENT in the City of Phoenix, has a model 300 foot x 300 foot walkable urban block pattern with
Most of the single and multifamily residential subdivisions in the slightly narrower parcel sizes at 50x130 feet, yet only one block has an alleyway.
Year # Residential
south central corridor were developed prior to 1975 and as early Plat/Built Subdivisions
and mid-century subdivisions. Today, many of the single-family 1894-1929 17
subdivisions are “built-out” and have well established residential 1930-1949 32
character. While only some of the multifamily zoned subdivisions 1950-1975 22
that were developed mostly with single-family homes are also 1976-1999 4 Approx.
well established, some areas transitioned to non-residential 2000-Present 13 300’ Block
Pattern
uses, and others have higher parcel vacancy and less defined
character. 300’


Block Pattern GRANT PARK
Residential platted subdivisions in the South Central
Corridor are mostly designed as traditional rectangular
blocks with mid-block alleyways, and organized on a
grid pattern ranging considerably in length but not in
width.
One block with an alleyway
The block length, including the right-of-way, varies from
Page 413
approximately 340 feet for the oldest subdivision, to an
average of 620-900+ feet. In comparison, the narrowest
Roosevelt Place East subdivision, platted in1930 by Dwight B. Heard and eligible as a historic
side of the block, the block width, is the predominant
district, is unique in the corridor with large lots averaging 130 x 300 feet in depth and a 50+
measurement throughout the corridor at approximately 300 feet, including the right-of-way and
feet front yard setbacks, and no alleyways.
alleyways. There are a few residential areas and subdivisions with greater block width (400 feet
including alleyways) but these are the exception to the rule.

The standard residential lot (parcel size) is 60 x 125-135 feet (depending on whether mid-block
alleys are present), and it is found in both, subdivisions zoned as single-family and multifamily
zoning districts. Residential front yard setbacks generally average between 20-25 feet.

Shorter block patterns are known to provide greater neighborhood connectivity, encouraging
walkability, and greater distribution of automobile traffic. It also provides a time-tested pre-
automobile pedestrian oriented form of urbanism. The South Central Corridors predominant 300 ROOSEVELT
foot block width is an element of its past to be preserved, protected, and enhanced to promote even
greater walkability in support of the community based vision for the future.
PLACE EAST
This analysis of block pattern, parcel sizes, and established setbacks for existing residential areas
begins to provide the foundational insights for future “character” standards to be consistent with and
build upon the established and transitional residential character areas.


176 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 177
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES

Alleyways
Regardless of how long a residential block might
be, and with very few exceptions, (Grant Park and
Roosevelt Place East subdivisions, and unplatted areas)
Alleyway as commercial
alleyways are the predominant feature of the ‘buffer zones’
South Central Corridor residential block structure.
mid-block alleyways
Alleyways provide access to private spaces and rear
of lots, they are typically 16-foot wide, unimproved, mid-block alleyways
and running the full length of the block. Power lines
are typically located in the alleyways and so are most
of the sewer lines in the corridor serving residential
subdivisions. Alleys also provide access for services
such as waste utilities access, in fact, most residential
garbage collection in the corridor is done from the Residential mid-block alleyways in residential areas and alleyways acting as residential ‘buffer
alleys. Alleyways are also present behind several zones’ providing a separation from commercial properties along Central Avenue.
commercial blocks fronting Central Avenue, acting as a
buffer zone between residential and commercial uses. Power lines at the entrance of alleyway
Allowing for ADUs provides opportunities to create
along West St Ann Avenue.
safer alleys where windows can increase natural
The residents of South Central Corridor have voiced surveillance by adding ‘eyes on the street’ (or in this
interest in the implementation of a new Accessory case ‘on the alley’), lighter wall colors are better at
Page 414
Dwelling Units (ADU) program for their neighborhoods as one strategy to achieve the vision of reflecting light, reducing the areas of concealment
rejecting displacement. While these dwellings are known by many names such as casitas, granny and ‘blending into the background’. Building or pole
flats, carriage/alley houses, mother-in-law or secondary dwelling units, the key difference is that mounted lighting fixtures with low-light pollution, good
ADUS are an accessory residential dwelling with fully functional kitchens that can be rented out, color rendition, and a smooth transition between light
unlike what is currently permitted under the single-family residence zoning district. sources can not only cause “unintended users” to feel
exposed but allows for greater recognition of ‘intended
Further discussion regarding implementation for ADUs will follow, but the importance of alleyways users’. All of these considerations must be thoroughly
for an ADU program must be noted: Alleyways provide for easy access and parking, making researched to provide appropriate development
it easier to incorporate a detached ADU in the rear of the lot, thereby creating a unit that standards and design guidelines when ADUs are to be
provides some privacy from the primary dwelling. Under certain circumstances, alleyways constructed in the South Central Corridor.
can be abandoned, and there is also a city program designed to gate alleyways. While these two
options may be appropriate for some areas, they may not be appropriate for the Corridor since With the presence of alleyways and the depth of most
both could negatively impact the implementation of ADUs. residential lots in the corridor (125-130 feet), building
a detached ADU in the rear will enhance alleyways
Alley safety is always an important consideration. Crime Prevention Through Environmental use and provide additional housing choices while
Design (CPTED) provides concepts and crime prevention strategies for communities and businesses. protecting and preserving the existing neighborhood
The proper use of CPTED strategies such as windows, colors, and lighting, can help residents character, block structures, and parcel configurations.
increase “natural surveillance”, establish clear access points and boundaries, and show that alleys Walla Walla, Washington recently
Maintaining alley access is a vital component
are commonly utilized by residents as “intended users”, not just for garbage pick-up. When this utilized CDBG Grants for a
for existing property owners to help achieve
occurs, a sense of ownership and the feeling of a safe community is enhanced, and it may reduce Solar Alley Lighting Project
the community vision and simultaneously build
the opportunity for the occurrence of crime. individual and community wealth.
178 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 179
MIXED-USE EMPLOYMENT (MUE)

WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES
C-3




RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER AREAS A-1
NORTH - RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER AREAS
7TH AVE 3RD AVE 1ST AVE
CENTRAL AVE
3RD ST 7TH ST

TRADITIONAL, ESTABLISHED, TRANSITIONAL

South Central Residential Growth Warehouse
Whether built in single-family or multi-family Lincoln Stations
zoned neighborhoods and subdivisions, single- LINCO
family homes are the most prevalent form of
Lincoln St
housing development in the South Central
R-3
Corridor, accounting for well over 3,100 existing GRANT ST
dwellings. The largest number of residential
subdivisions were platted post World War II y e Station Place
and the Korean War - during the valley’s growth C-3
cke Intensity; 2-4 sto Typ
rie e
boom – to 1979, the end of the mid-century Bu w s
R-4 ( Lo )
Central Park
modern period. These subdivisions and many neighborhoods have distinct character representative ERN 7th St
of their build-out and well established single-family neighborhood scale and intensity. Commercial Corridor A-1



Residential Character Areas Introduction
7th Ave
R-5
Two residential “character areas” emerge as long-established single-family scaled neighborhoods, 3rd St BUCK
3rd Ave
Lowell
Buckeye Rd
some dating as far back as the early 1900s, but they are not zoned the same: some neighborhoods Elementary
Phoenix
Page 415
School
are zoned as single-family and others are zoned for multi-family development. Another, Memorial
C-2
third, residential “character area” represents areas that have experienced more ‘transitional’ Harmon
development, may have had specific requirements such as Marcos De Niza housing development, Library
and Park A-1
and/or lack the cohesiveness of a well established residential character.
A-2
R-4
Three emerging Residential Character Areas in the South Central Corridor are: R-5
TMN
TRADITIONAL RESIDENTIAL ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL TRANSITIONAL MULTI-FAMILY
NEIGHBORHOOD (TRN) NEIGHBORHOOD (ERN) NEIGHBORHOOD (TMN)
Central Ave.
R-3
• Zoned single-family • Zoned multi-family • Zoned multi-family ERN
R-3
C-3
• Built at single-family scale • Built at single-family scale • Built at various scales C-2

• Generally “areas to protect” • Generally “areas to enhance” • Generally “areas to enhance” Mohave St MOHA
Housing Typology Example: Housing Typology Example: Housing Typology Example: A-1



South Central TOD C-2

Academia
Multifamily Zoning A-2
Del R-4
Pueblo
§
¦
¨ 17 School wa y
North District I-17 Free
ERN Established Residential Neighborhood
Multi-generational/ADU Multi-Unit House* Townhouse/Rowhouse
TMN Transitional Multi-Family Neighborhood N
*Multi-Unit House designed to accommodate two to six units at the scale and massing of a large single-family detached house. Downtown Code Existing Character Areas
180 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 181
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES
South Area
Zoning



SOUTH - RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER AREAS
7TH AVE
CENTRAL AVE
7TH ST SOUTH MTN - RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER AREAS
Elwood ELWOOD ST
A-2 A-1
A-1
CENTRAL AVE
7TH AVE 7TH ST
TMN Vineyard VINEYAR
ERN
Cesar
Ho-E Mini Park
Chavez
C-2 Community
R-3 TMN ERN School
TRN Southgate R-3
y Station Pla R-4
dwa w Intensity; 2 ce T
a L o TMN
ro m-
-5 yp
st TMN
3rd Ave TRN
iu o C-2
(M B r
ed e ies)

TMN
Broadway Fremont
BROADWAY RD

TRN n e Station Place
TMNR-4
Hayden R-5
ERN
ERN Park ERN s nte
eli IR-5 nsity; 2-4 st Ty
or p
TMN B ie e
s
a ow
TMN ( L ) Western Canal
R-3 R-3

ERN ERN ESPIRITU CHARTER

e r Station Place T
ity; 2-4 s yp
es ntens tor e
ie ERN
Roow I s SCHOOL
TMN ( L )
CodyERN BASELI
R-5 Baseline
TRN ERN
Page 416
TMN
Roeser
C-2
TNC
SUNLAND ELEMENTARY
TRN TRN
NFL YET COLLEGE
PREP ACADEMY
Momo Park
SCHOOL
Jesse Owens
R-4 Sunland
Traditional tation Plac SOUTH POINTE
TRN rn S
R-3
ERN the tensity; 2-4 st e Typ ERN EXISTING
Residential or MIXED USE JUNIOR HIGH Highline Canal
S ou w In ie
s e
( Lo ) AGRICULTURE
Neighborhood TMN (MUA)


ERN Established R-5 R-3 TRN
C-1 TMN
Residential Southern
South CentralSOUTHERN
TOD AVE 7th St
Neighborhood TMN
R-5
7th Ave
Roosevelt
Multifamily Zoning
School SOUTH MOUNTAIN
District South Mountain Ave
Central Ave.
TMN Transitional South Mountain District
St. Catherine
South Mountain
Multi-Family Community Center +
Church El Reposo Park
TRN
Neighborhood TRN TRADITIONAL
TRN RESIDENTIAL Neighborhood
Traditional ResidentialTRANSITIONAL COMMERCIAL (TC)
St. Catherine
C-2 School NEIGHBORHOOD (TRN)
N
Phoenix ERN Established Residential Neighborhood
Baptist ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL MAIN STREET (MS)
TMN
TRN NEIGHBORHOOD (ERN)
Lutheran
Church TMN Transitional Multi-Family Neighborhood .
TRANSITIONAL MULTI-FAMILY
7th St
N MIXED-USE (MU) Miles
7th Ave 3rd St NEIGHBORHOOD (TMN)
0 0.075 0.15 0.3
3rd Ave Central Ave.
VINEYARD RD
Vineyard
\\pdss01gis\GIS\Projects\SouthCentral_TOD_Multifamily\MXDs\South_Central_TOD_Residential_South-5-14.mxd




182 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 183
MIXED-USE EMPLOYMENT (MUE)
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




TRADITIONAL RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD (TRN) TRADITIONAL RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD (TRN)
CHARACTER AREAS CHARACTER AREAS - EXAMPLE
Background: The Roosevelt Place East Neighborhood is one of several Traditional Residential Neighborhood
Residential development followed a distinct pattern in the South Central Corridor. All single-family (TRN) Character Areas. These areas are generally zoned for single-family and currently built-out
zoned neighborhoods were platted as subdivisions and zoned as R1-6, with the exception of the with an established single-family neighborhood scale and character.
Roosevelt Place East subdivision, which is zoned R1-10. All single-family subdivisions are located
south of the Rio Salado and the greatest concentration is in the South Central Corridors South and
South Mountain Sub-Areas. The majority of single-family zoned subdivisions were platted between 7th
1940 -1975, and quickly built-out. These early subdivisions, built with almost no cul-de-sacs and Stre
e t
only a few with curvilinear streets, have a better ‘walkable street pattern’ than those being built
today. This traditional street grid allows for better pedestrian circulation because they have more oad
connecting streets and no dead-ends. ay R
enw
Gre
Character Considerations: Building and Housing
• Zoned R1-6 or R1-10 Typology Considerations: d
• Generally identified as “Areas to Protect” Roa
ter
n Car
• Subdivisions are typically built-out with Ce Je
sse
Page 417
limited parcel vacancy tra Ow
• Stable single-family character n en
ve s
• Defined building setbacks of 20+ feet lA Pk
w
ue y
• Defined streetscape patterns
Single-family - One Story Single-family - Two Story
Form-Based Code Considerations:
The City’s single-family residential Euclidean The Roosevelt Place East
zoning districts of R1-6 and R-10 are Subdivision, zoned R1-10,
commensurate with the Walkable Urban is a unique neighborhood in
Code Transect T3:2. Single-family standards the South Central Corridor. It
and guidelines will be retained, the only contains many homes already
difference is a slight increase in lot coverage listed in the Phoenix Register
Multi-generational/ADU Duplex - Single Story of Historic Homes and the
– this increase may prove to be an asset
when Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) subdivision is eligible for
are permitted on site and it might reduce historic designation on its own.
the need for zoning adjustments for lot Some character considerations
coverage. are preserving the very rural
setting with deep front setbacks
(50+ feet) and palm tree lined
Duplex - Two Story Multi-Unit House* streets.
*Designed to accommodate two to six units at the scale and
184 HOW WE GET THERE massing of a large single-family detached house. HOW WE GET THERE 185
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD (ERN) ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD (ERN)
CHARACTER AREAS CHARACTER AREAS - EXAMPLE
Background: Grant Park, platted in 1894 as part of the Montgomery Addition, was also developed as a single-
Starting with Grant Park, platted in 1894, Established Residential Neighborhoods (ERNs) are family neighborhood, yet it is zoned for multi-family development with entitlements ranging from 30
residential communities that were developed as single-family residential, but are actually zoned to 48 feet in height.
for multifamily development, allowing for greater density, 30-48 feet in height, and 50% lot
coverage. Not all ERNs were platted as subdivisions, some developed organically on larger parcels
(mostly on the east side of Central Avenue) with a more rural character. Most ENCs were developed
during the valley’s greatest growth period between 1930-1960s.
Street
Grant 1s
Character Considerations: Building and Housing Street
tA
n 2n
d ve
• Multi-family Zoning S herma
Typology Considerations: 3r d
Av nu
e
• Generally identified as “Areas to Enhance” reet en
ey St en ue
• Generally developed at single-family 5t Hadl Av
t ue
residential scale u ven tree
hA oS
• Few multifamily dwellings, mostly Aven Tont
h ue
comprised of duplexes and triplexes enue 6t d
e Roa
Page 418
• Stable and Established Character eye M
7th Av Buck on
• Defined building setbacks of 20+ feet Single-family - One Story Single-family - Two Story 4t te
n m
• Defined streetscape patterns ve zu
h A a
ue e.
Av
Form-Based Code Considerations:
To retain the character of Established
Residential Neighborhoods, an alternative While vacant lots are more
Transect may need to be developed to Multi-generational/ADU Duplex - Single Story prominent in this area, the 300
provide standards and design guidelines that foot block pattern, established
are compatible with these neighborhoods. setbacks, and streetscape character
For instance, while the standard large glass are very well defined providing a
storefront may be appropriate for commercial great neighborhood structure for
and mixed use developments, it is not enhanced walkability. This culturally
compatible with a residential street. New and historically rich neighborhood
transects will provide guidance for new infill Duplex - Two Story Multi-Unit House
is the closest to downtown and
developments while allowing for entitlements still possesses some of the oldest
already permitted by right in that zoning buildings in the city. 818 S 1st Street,
district; and a slight increase in lot coverage is one of many historic homes in
more than the 40-50 percentage currently the neighborhood and listed in the
permitted in R-3, R-4, and R-5 multifamily Phoenix and National Register of
zoning districts. Courtyard Housing Townhouse/Rowhouse historic places.
186 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 187
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




TRANSITIONAL MULTIFAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD (TMN) TRANSITIONAL MULTIFAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD (TMN)
CHARACTER AREAS CHARACTER AREAS - EXAMPLE
Background: Marcos De Niza Housing and surrounding properties are examples of an Transitional Multi-Family
Transitional multifamily areas lack the cohesiveness of an established residential character, have Residential (TMR) Character Area. Generally zoned for multi-family, however currently built-out
more vacant parcels, and/or have some properties that have transitioned to non-residential uses with a single-family neighborhood scale and character.
over time, usually at intersections. These areas could incorporate more intense development to
help provide additional housing and affordable housing in the corridor, but still in the context of
residential. ad
c ke ye Ro t
Bu i Stree
p a et
Yava a Stre Ce
Yum t
Characteristics: g o Stree nt
ra
Building and Housing Pap a 1s lA
• Multi-family Zoning t ve
Typology Considerations: Av
en n ue
• Generally identified as “Areas to et ue
a Stre 3r
d
Enhance” Pim et Av
• Generally developed at small multi- h Stre en
oc opa ue
family residential scale C
5t t r eet
• Variety of multifamily dwellings n have S
Page 419
Ave Mo
• Lacking Established Character 7 h
• Undefined building setbacks Multi-generational/ADU Duplex - Single Story u ue t )
t ree -17
• Undefined streetscape patterns Aven ac he S - 17 (I
th Ap tat e
e rs
Inte
Form-Based Code Considerations:
Front setbacks should be a minimum of
10 feet to encourage a more defined
building setback and streetscape inclusive Marcos De Niza housing
Duplex - Two Story Multi-Unit House
of adequate space for landscape and development was built at
shade trees. Frontage types should be a single-family residential
clearly identified for individual ground floor scale with low profile building
units. The existing Walkable Urban Code placement organized within
Transect (T4) was designed for light rail and large publicly accessible share
arterial streets and if applied here should be open spaces. Cross block
modified to include a minimum setback and Courtyard Housing Townhouse/Rowhouse and direct pedestrian
to restrict non-residential frontage types such connections to and from
as storefront, gallery, and arcade. building entryways and to
the shared open spaces
enhance neighborhood
level connectivity to nearby
Live/Work Small Multi-family community points of pride.
188 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 189
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



MIXED-USE CHARACTER AREAS
ENHANCING THE “SIDEWALK BALLET”
South Central Commercial Growth Several emerging Mixed-Use “Character Areas” in the South Central Corridor are:
South Central Avenue has historically been
identified as a “main street” destination, most
explicitly in the Rio Montana Area Plan (adopted TRANSITIONAL COMMERCIAL (TC) MAIN STREET (MS)
in the year 2000), and more recently with the
community-based vision for Equitable Transit • Zoned Commercial Building Typology Examples: • Zoned Commercial Building Typology Examples:

Oriented Development as part of this South • Built at a small • Built at small scale, often
scale, often limited limited by parcel depth
Central Equitable TOD Community Plan. by parcel sizes and • Offers opportunities for
configurations walkable “main street”
Mixed Use Character Areas Introduction • Typically on the edge frontage treatments
A community’s character can be a strong of neighborhoods; • Generally “Areas to
sometimes Live/Work Enhance” Small Commercial
incentive to retain existing residents, attract
new residents and businesses, and substantially found interior to
neighborhoods
improve the quality of life for everyone. • Generally “Areas to
Therefore, mixed-use centers and corridors can Enhance”
Page 420 become a great asset at the neighborhood and
regional scales. The diverse communities along Azukar Coffee’s outdoor patio used for
these areas contribute with an extension of their evening gatherings and cultural events along Small Commercial Live/Work Small Mixed-Use

own community values, local community that South Central Avenue.
provides for a variety of businesses, from small
corner stores to larger markets, coffee shops and MIXED-USE (MU) MIXED-USE EMPLOYMENT (MUE)
sit-down restaurants, local services and regional
As Jane Jacobs so eloquently described it in • Zoned Multi- Building Typology Examples: • Zoned Commercial or Building Typology Examples:
amenities; all contributing to authentic and
Family Residential, Industrial
culturally diverse vibrancy prioritizing people.
“ The Death and Life of American Cities, much
Commercial, or • Built medium to large
of the essence of urban living is reflected in Industrial scale
The key in urban design is to consider these the “sidewalk ballet” of people going about • Built at a small to • 1/4 to 1/2 mile of
“Mixed-Use Areas” as a network of destinations, their daily errands, wandering along the medium scale Transit Stations
a connected oasis, contributing to the heart of margins of public spaces (streets, sidewalks, • Within 1/4 mile of • Large Parcels support
Transit Stations Small Mixed-Use increased land use scale Large Employment
the south central corridor, a hub radiating such parks) and in and out of quasi-private
spaces that encompasses all commercial • Medium parcels and intensity for more
vibrancy that its a place you want to go to, present opportunities job creation
not a place you have to go to. businesses and services. for enhancing station • Generally “Areas to
area connectivity Enhance and Invest
QUANTIFYING JANE JACOBS
“ • Generally “areas to
Joe Cortright, cityobservatory.org enhance” with some
“Areas to Invest” Medium Mixed-Use Large Mixed-Use




190 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 191
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES
North
DSDSPA.ZONING



NORTH - MIXED USE CHARACTER AREAS
7TH AVE 3RD AVE 1ST AVE
CENTRAL AVE
3RD ST R-3
7TH ST RIO SALADO - MIXED USE CHARACTER AREAS
7TH AVE

2ND AVE 7TH ST
Warehouse
CENTRAL AVE

§
¨
¦
Lincoln Stations

Lincoln St LINCOLN ST
A-1

C-3 A-1

MUE
R-3
ANT ST
TC
MUE WATKIN
y e Station Place
TC C-3
cke Intensity; 2-4 sto Typ
rie e
Bu w
TC s 00’
R-4 ( Lo )
Central Park S a l a do 5 er
f Ri
Rio itat Buf
b o
a
7th St H H a S al
bi a d
TC A-1 ta o 5
tB
Rio Salado uf 00’
fe
r UNIVER
Habitat
Commercial Corridor

R-5 Restoration
BUCKEYE RD A-1
3rd Ave 3rd St Buckeye Rd
Lowell
7th Ave
Elementary
Page 421 Phoenix Rio Salado
School
Memorial
on Stati
MS Audob
ns o Habitat
C-2 Rio Salado o A-2
MUE
/ Inte ity; 3-6 s n Pl
Harmon Restoration
Library
Habitat ad ium
tor a
i e
and Park A-1 Restoration A-2 (M l
ed s ce *)
Rio Salado
Rio
R-4
A-2 Sa Audobon pe
Center
Ty
R-5



Rio Salado 500’
0’ Habitat Buffer
o 50 er
f
Central Ave.
ad f
R-3 al t Bu
R-3 MU i o S i ta
R ab
C-3 H
C-2

TC
Mohave St MOHAVE ST
MU
A-1 MUE
MUE A-1

C-2
TC
South Central TOD C-3
TC A-1
Academia Multifamily Zoning
A-2 .
Del R-4
Pueblo
Rio Salado District A-1
MU Mixed-Use §
¦
¨ 17 School
0 0.0475 0.095
Miles
0.19
ELWO
\\pdss01gis\GIS\Projects\SouthCentral_TOD_Multifamily\MXDs\South_Central_TOD_Residential_North-5-14.mxd




MUE Mixed-Use Employment wa y
I-17 Free MUTRADITIONAL RESIDENTIAL
Mixed-Use TRANSITIONAL COMMERCIAL (TC)
TC Transitional Commercial NEIGHBORHOOD (TRN)
N Mixed-Use
MUEESTABLISHED Employment
RESIDENTIAL MAIN STREET (MS)
Downtown Code Existing Character Areas NEIGHBORHOOD (ERN) N
192 HOW WE GET THERE TRANSITIONAL MULTI-FAMILY HOW WE GET THERE 193
MIXED-USE (MU)
NEIGHBORHOOD (TMN)
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES
South Area
Zoning



SOUTH - MIXED USE CHARACTER AREAS
7TH AVE
CENTRAL AVE
7TH ST SOUTH MTN - MIXED USE CHARACTER AREAS
Elwood ELWOOD ST
MUE
A-2 MUE A-1
A-1 7TH AVE
CENTRAL AVE
7TH ST


MS
Vineyard VINEYAR
Cesar
Ho-E Mini Park
Chavez
C-2 Community
R-3 School
Southgate TC R-3
y Station Pla R-4
dwa w Intensity; 2 ce T
a L o -5 yp
ro m- st
3rd Ave
iu o C-2
(M B r MS
ed e ies)


Broadway
MS Fremont
BROADWAY RD

MU n e Station Place
R-4
Hayden nsity; 2-4 st Ty R-5
Park s nte
eli IR-5 or p
TC B ie e
s
a ow
( L ) Western Canal
R-3 R-3 MU
ESPIRITU CHARTER
tation Pla
ser Sensity; 2-4 sce Ty
e n t tor pe
ie
Roow I MU s SCHOOL Cody TC
(R-5
L ) Baseline BASELI

Page 422 MU Mixed-Use
Roeser MUE
Mixed-Use C-2
MUE
Employment
SUNLAND ELEMENTARY
MU
MS NFL YET COLLEGE
MS Main Street PREP ACADEMY
Momo Park
SCHOOL
Jesse Owens
R-4 Sunland
SOUTH POINTE
Transitional rn S
tation Plac
MS
TC R-3 the tensity; 2-4 st e Typ EXISTING
Commercial or MIXED USE JUNIOR HIGH Highline Canal
S ou w In ie
s e
( Lo MU ) AGRICULTURE
(MUA)


R-5 R-3
C-1
MS
Southern
South CentralSOUTHERN
TOD AVE 7th Ave 7th St
MU Roosevelt
R-5 Multifamily Zoning
School SOUTH MOUNTAIN
District South Mountain Ave
Central Ave.
South Mountain District
St. Catherine
South Mountain
Community Center +
Church El Reposo Park

MS MU Mixed-Use
TRADITIONAL RESIDENTIAL TRANSITIONAL COMMERCIAL (TC)
St. Catherine
C-2 School NEIGHBORHOOD (TRN)
MUE Mixed-Use Employment N
Phoenix
Baptist ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL MAIN STREET (MS)
NEIGHBORHOOD
MS (ERN)
Lutheran Main Street
Church .
TRANSITIONAL MULTI-FAMILY
Central Ave. 7th St
N MIXED-USE (MU) Miles
7th Ave 3rd St TC NEIGHBORHOOD (TMN)
TC Transitional Commercial 0 0.075 0.15 0.3
3rd Ave MS
VINEYARD RD
Vineyard
\\pdss01gis\GIS\Projects\SouthCentral_TOD_Multifamily\MXDs\South_Central_TOD_Residential_South-5-14.mxd




194 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 195
MIXED-USE EMPLOYMENT (MUE)
WHAT WE WANT
R-3
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE GRANT ST NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES
TC


TC C-3


R-4 Central ParkTC
TRANSITIONAL COMMERCIAL (TC) TRANSITIONAL COMMERCIAL (TC) CHARACTER AREAS
CHARACTER AREAS TC I-17 ADJACENT PROPERTIES - EXAMPLE Commercial Corridor A-1



Background: I-17 adjacent properties are examples ofR-5a Transitional Commercial (TC) Character Areas.
The South Central Corridor is uniquely positioned between two arterial north-south roads known Generally zoned for commercial, built at small scale with limited access, and in this context serves BUCK
Lowell
as “the 7’s” (7th Avenue and 7th Street), and also bisected by the Interstate-17 (I-17) freeway. as a “buffer” to the interior established residential neighborhoods to the north.
Elementary
Phoenix
Commercial areas straddle portions of these “high level of service” vehicular corridors creating School
Memorial
C-2
a “buffer” to interior established neighborhoods. Conversely, traditional neighborhood design Harmon
included small commercial parcels centered in neighborhoods for small retail, restaurants and Library
and Park A-1
services. Both of these instances are examples of “Transitional Commercial” character areas.
A-2
R-4
Characteristics: R-5
Building and Housing
• Zoned Commercial Typology Considerations:
• Built at a small scale, often limited by parcel 7th Street
sizes and configurations R-3
7th Avenue
• Context is critical: typically on the edge of R-3
C-3
C-2
neighborhoods; however some instances Mohave Street MOHA
TC
interior to neighborhoods
Page 423
• Generally “Areas to Enhance” A-1

Adaptive Reuse Small Multi-family
South Central TOD C-2
TC
Form-Based Code Considerations: TC
Academia
Edge Example - Shall ease the transition from Multifamily Zoning Del R-4
Pueblo A-2
y
a “high level of service” vehicular corridor to North District §
¦
¨ Central Ave.
School
I-17 F
reewa
the quaint, quiet, established residential areas.
Height, step backs and setbacks should be Additional Policy Considerations:
positioned away from residential to minimize Multi-Unit Building Townhouse/Rowhouse The I-17 Transitional Commercial areas future
impacts. development shall address:
• Air quality and the health impacts of “high level of
Interior Example - Centered interior to service” vehicular corridors.
neighborhoods typically on residential streets, • Trade-offs of locating residential uses within proximity
these Transitional Commercial areas must to “high level of service” vehicular corridors
be respectful and responsive to established • Design Standards to minimize health and equity
Live/Work Small Commercial
residential character and provide distinct impacts for people living in and adjacent to this area.
building form as a neighborhood amenity while
balancing the need for walk-up access due to limited (if any) vehicular on-site parking. Frontage
standards should be inviting and provide shade and comfort, while establishing these areas as small
neighborhood nodes of activity.


196 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 197
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




MAIN STREET (MS) MAIN STREET (MS) CHARACTER AREAS
CHARACTER AREAS CENTRAL AVENUE NORTH OF BASELINE - EXAMPLE
Background: Central Avenue north of Baseline Road commercial properties are examples of Main Street (MS)
Central Avenue is the spine of the South Mountain Village, but it is also South Central Corridor’s Character Area. Generally zoned for commercial, currently built at smaller scales and lower
‘main street’. While the avenue is over 5 miles long, it is characterized by commercial hubs located intensities, and limited by parcel depths and adjacency to established residential neighborhoods.
7TH AVE
CENTRAL AVE
7TH ST
at the intersection of arterial streets, such as Southern Avenue, and Broadway and Baseline Roads,
VINEYA
and closer to downtown, between Lincoln Street and Buckeye Road. These hubs are often just a
few short blocks in length, and mostly surrounded by existing residential neighborhoods, some
established as far back as the early 1900s.
R-3

Characteristics: Building and Housing C-2
• Zoned Commercial MS
Typology Considerations:
• Built at smaller scales, often limited by 7th Street
parcel depth
7th Avenue
• Offers opportunities for walkable “main
street” frontage treatments R-4
R-5
• Generally “Areas to Enhance” R-5
Page 424
Western Canal
Form-Based Code Considerations:
Live/Work Small Commercial
Without on-street parking and with narrow
parcel depths, future development within
the “Main Street” character areas need to
Central Ave.
Baseline Road BASELI
be designed to have visual interest, scale,
and compatibility with their immediate Additional Policy Guidance:
surroundings. A mixture of uses can also In addition, Land Use and Design Principles identified by
provide more vibrancy and intensity to Small Mixed-Use Medium Mixed-Use the community in the South Mountain Village C-2
Character
the area, however must be sensitive to the Plan provide guidance for Central Avenue’s future
established residential neighborhoods. development: NFL YET COLLEGE
• ‘Continue ACADEMY
PREPthe development of Central Avenue as the
Development at intersections should provide additional enhancement to create focal points and city’s transit spine and the principal street of Phoenix,
should provide clear indication for access to business parking behind buildings. Successful frontage SOUTH POINTE
concentrating
MS the maximum intensity of commercial
EXISTING
treatment is key to a successful main street environment, regardless of height, colorful awnings, MIXED USE JUNIOR HIGH
office and retail uses downtown.’
AGRICULTURE
murals, and artistic signs make store fronts more attractive, easily identifiable, unique, and visible to (MUA) • ‘Establish design standards and guidelines for parking
potential customers, day or night, especially while riding the light rail. lots and structures, setback and build to lines, blank
R-3
wall space, shade, and other elements affecting
South Central TOD pedestrians, to encourage pedestrian activity and
Multifamily Zoning Colorful awnings - “main street” identify options for providing pedestrian-oriented
SOUTH MOUNTAIN
South Mountain District design in different types of development.’
198 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 199
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES

7TH AVE CENTRAL 7TH ST

EL
MIXED-USE (MU) MIXED-USE (MU) CHARACTERMUE
AREAS -
A-2 MUE A-1
A-1
CHARACTER AREAS BROADWAY STATION AREA EXAMPLE
Background: Broadway Station and surrounding properties are examples of a Mixed-Use (MU) Character Area.
There are great commercial lot variations throughout the South Central Corridor and with the Generally zoned for commercial,Ho-Elocated within 1/4 mile of the transit station,Cesar
Mini Park and containing a
Chavez
construction of the light rail, Central Avenue is presented with an opportunity to build intentional variety of parcels with opportunities to enhance the Community
C-2station areas connectivity.
nodes of walkable urban form that will nurture the Equitable TOD envisioned for future development R-3 School
in line with the South Central Corridor community plan which is to create ‘an active, vibrant, R-4
culturally and ethnically relevant corridor prominent in safe, unique, and intentional public gathering
places where everyone is welcome’.
Characteristics: Building and Housing
• Zoned Multi-Family Residential, Typology Considerations: Ed Pastor Transit Center
Commercial, or Industrial
• Built at a small to medium scale Nuevo Park
• Within 1/4 mile of Transit Stations Broadway
MS Road BR
• Medium parcels present opportunities for
enhancing station area connectivity Hayden
MU
Page 425
• Generally “areas to enhance” with key Park
Live/Work Small Mixed-Use
properties identified as “Areas to Invest”
Travis L Williams AZ DES
Form-Based Code Considerations: 7th Avenue Family
R-3Services Center R-3 7th Street
Broadway Station Area Example - The area
Central Ave.
at the intersection of Broadway Road and ESPIRITU CHARTER

Central Avenue, was first identified as the Broadway Connectivity Considerations:
core of the South Mountain Village back in Medium Mixed-Use Large Mixed-Use MUand a future light rail stop
• Transportation Hub - Ed Pastor Transit Center, SCHOOL
the early 1990’s and adopted as the core • Shopping and Services Hub – R-5 banking services, grocery store, local businesses
in 1993. It is also located at the very center • Residential Hub – Well established single-family residential neighborhoods surround this hub;
and core of the South Central Corridor, with a variety of community amenities to build off of. The upcoming affordable multi-family residential (Central and Broadway PUD) and vacant parcels,
north side of Broadway Road, west of Central Avenue, is already under development and because including city owned parcels, offer many opportunities for increased residential in this area.
of SRP lines, the frontage setbacks are deeper, creating a more spacious feel to the pedestrian realm • Community Services Hub – Travis L. Williams Family Service Center offering services that
that is more compatible with Hayden Park across the road. To some extent, this spacious feeling includes preschool children participating in Head Start programs to older adults attending senior
can be replicated on the south side creating an enhanced pedestrian streetscape, compatible center activities, Department of Economic Security (DES) and many primary care centers are
with the park’s streetscape. A minimum 10-foot shaded front yard setback (from the property located here.
line) on the south side of Broadway Road connecting Hayden Park to 2nd Street will provide a SUNLAND ELEMENTARY
• Recreation Hub – Easily accessed via Broadway Road, MU Hayden Park and Nueve Park (Nueve
safer environment against the vehicular traffic. These shaded setbacks also offer the opportunity Skate Plaza) provide many amenities for the community such as jogging/walking paths, lighted
for outdoor dining, creating a more inviting environment and a more spacious, cooler and vibrant basketball, playground, ramada and picnic areas, restrooms, lighted soccer/softball, lighted
experience for pedestrians, children, transit riders, and shoppers. SCHOOL
tennis, lighted volleyball, and a recreation building (Hayden Park). Momo Park

R-4
200 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 201
R-3
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




MIXED-USE EMPLOYMENT (MUE) MIXED-USE EMPLOYMENT (MUE) CHARACTER AREA
CHARACTER AREA RIO SALADO AREA - EXAMPLE
Background: Rio Salado has some of the most examples of Mixed-Use Employment (MUE) Character Areas.
There are several areas in the corridor that are predominantly zoned for Commercial and Industrial Generally zoned for commercial and industrial uses, located 1/4 to 1/2 mile from transit stations,
uses. As the South Central Corridor evolves towards the vision of a walkable environment these and containing some of the largest parcels and assemblages with opportunities to grow jobs.
R-3
areas present opportunities to grow the number of jobs at the highest scales and intensities in the 7TH AVE

7TH ST
Corridor. These “Mixed-Use Employment” areas will nurture innovative green industries, flexible Rio Salado Connectivity
2ND AVE CENTRAL AVE


office and maker spaces, and smart manufacturing, all within and supporting new walkable, safe, 17
§
¨
¦
Considerations:
and transit accessible ETOD infrastructure and building form. One of the best and greener A-1

C-3 A-1

sections of Rio Salado lies MUE
Characteristics: Building and Housing
• Zoned Commercial or Industrial within the boundaries of the WATKINS ST
Typology Considerations: MUE
• Built medium to large scale South Central Corridor, with
the South Terrace and South 00’
do 5 er
• 1/4 to 1/2 mile of Transit Stations Sala f Ri
Rio itat Buf o
Over bank trails leading right Hab Ha Sal
bi ad
• Large Parcels support increased land use ta o 5
Rio Salado tB
uf 00’
fe
r UNIVERSITY
scale and intensity for more job creation into the Audubon Center, and Habitat
Restoration
the North Over bank trail to the A-1
• Generally “Areas to Enhance and Invest”
Page 426 Rio Salado Restoration Area. Rio Salado
Live/Work Small Mixed-Use As sand and gravel operations Rio Salado Habitat
A-2
Form-Based Code Considerations: Habitat Restoration
Rio Salado Area Example - Rio Salado Beyond begin to transition out of the Restoration A-2
Rio Salado
areas surrounding Rio Salado, Audobon
the Banks Area Plan and reflected in Section Center


655: Rio Salado Interim Overlay District, opportunities to redevelop these
’ Rio Salado 500’
properties will come to fruition. 00 Habitat Buffer
states the purpose of the Overlay district was o 5 er
l
a t
ad Buf f
o S ta
All properties adjacent the Ri abi
designed to ’protect the investment in and H


maximize the benefits of the Rio Salado Habitat Medium Mixed-Use Large Mixed-Use Salado are very large, the
Restoration Project. The overlay district is average length is approximately MUE
MUE
A-1

C-3
2,000 feetSouth Central TOD
presenting challenges
designed to control open, outdoor land uses Multifamily Zoning A-1


and other uses in order to have a positive to the South Central Corridor
Rio Salado District A-1
ELWOOD S
impact on the Rio Salado Habitat Restoration vision for enhanced connectivity.
Project and add to the long-term value of
adjacent land.’ Requirements and guidelines Screening that can blend with the environment should also be considered when it can be seen from
Parking Structure with Large Employment the trails. Line-of-site measurements should be included as part of development plans. Natural
are quite extensive for new development. ground level retail
Regardless of what type of development is retention concrete walls, without streets, surface parking, or paved sidewalks and located further
proposed for the parcels backing (or fronting) Rio Salado, special consideration should be taken from Salado trails to allow trees and shade should blend well with the environment and maintain the
regarding the type of screening, retention walls, or frontage standards, that might be required to trail experience. New construction architecture should have natural and rustic appearances similar
achieve the South Central Vision for this sub area. to that established with the Audobon Center, and having intentional connections between private
property to the trails in a more natural setting.


202 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 203
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



ACHIEVING THE VISION REJECTING DISPLACMENT
VISION TO IMPLEMENTATION
VISION TO IMPLEMENTATION
Successful implementation of long range plans require leaders who are committed to the vision and 6 PLANNING
champion strategies, policies, and actions to achieve it. The coalition of partners, including the
ELEMENTS Land Use Housing Economic Health Mobility Green
Steering Committee, provides a foundation for multi-sector and place-based leadership. It is essential, Development Systems
however, that this leadership strengthens over the coming years and persists through multiple political
and economic cycles.
CORRIDOR-WIDE AREA-SPECIFIC AREA-SPECIFIC PRIORITY
VISION THEMES INVESTMENTS SITES AND CORRIDORS
CORRIDOR-WIDE VISION (WHAT WE WANT) (WHAT WE WANT) (WHERE WE WANT IT)
HEALTH
PROTECTIVE SHADE AND COOLING
The Vision is feasible but also bold and ambitious. Implementing the plan will require focused, • Environmentally Equitable Compact Community
efficient, and organized execution that spans multiple decades. This plan is designed as a tool • Sustainability & Resiliency - reducing
for facilitating collaboration, aligning policies, and coordinating action across a multi-sector vulnerability
• Stabilization of Neighborhoods DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY BENEFITS:
Protective Shade and Cooling • Safer Walking Environment
are improvements such • Safer Bicycling
coalition of public, private, and non-profit investors - including government agencies, businesses, • Incremental Change and Growth as structures, landscaping Environment
and amenities that cool and • Safer Public Spaces
cover sensitive locations. • Cooler and More
foundations, schools, neighborhood associations, and individual residents. The community-driven • Authentic Regional Destination Canopies, vegetation, splash Comfortable Outdoor
pads, fountains and other Places
enhancements are used to
• Improved Parks and Recreation Access reduce exposure to high
vision for long term sustainability and equitable TOD, provides a guide for making strategic, collective temperatures and solar
radiation for targeted locations
• Walkable Communities such as playgrounds, seating
areas, sports courts and routes
investment decisions that maximize impact towards REJECTING DISPLACEMENT. to schools.
• Community Economic Development
PSC
SOUTH CENTRAL TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) | INVESTMENT MENU
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LAND USE OPPORTUNITY HOUSING GREEN SYSTEMS TRANSPORTATION HEALTH
Page 427 • 59% of responses identified economic development as a part of 94% of responses were related to land use, in terms of new • 15% of responses identified housing as part of their personal goals. 72% of the responses identified parks as missing recreational • 60% of responses identified needs related to mobility in the • 22% of responses identified health related improvements as a need
their personal goals. development to provide quality recreational opportunities for their • Goals included homeownership, improving the quality of their opportunities from their community. community to improve their quality of life. in the future state of Central Avenue.
• Goals were primarily related to employment, included finding/ community. current home and hopes of staying in their current home/ • Mobility related responses were identifying safety and lighting
VISION FOR THE FUTURE

• All responses were related to making improvements in
WHAT WE WANT
CORRIDOR-WIDE OUTCOMES maintaining work or achieving education for better work neighborhood (resistance to displacement). needs, as well as street maintenance and traffic improvements. cleanliness along Central Avenue.
opportunities.
• Other goals included gaining financial security.
The first step in the strategy-building process is operationalizing the vision with performance
measures and long range aspirational targets based on an optimal condition that may not be
feasible in all cases. Creating these performance benchmarks helps focus execution and provides
CORRIDOR-WIDE OUTCOMES CORRIDOR-WIDE STRATEGY SPECIFIC
an evaluation mechanism for accountability and ongoing policy adjustments. (TOWARDS ACHIEVING THE VISION) STRATEGY CARDS 5-YEAR ACTION
Outcome 1: 15-Minute City
(TOWARDS ACHIEVING ITEMS
L.U. Outcome 2: Incremental Growth and Development MEASURABLE PROGRESS) (JUMP STARTERS)
CORRIDOR-WIDE “STRATEGY CARDS” + POLICIES Outcome 3: Honoring Our Stories
Outcome 1: Preserve Neighborhood Affordability Lead Partner
“Strategy cards” organized by the six (6) planning elements are derived from national best practices STRATEGY 1: Government including the local, state,
Outcome 2: Neighborhood Diversity and federal agencies.
Apply the Walkable
and engagement with both community development professionals and South Central residents. Housing Strategy Specific 5-Year City
Outcome 3: Neighborhood Beautification Urban Code (Form- Tools
Action Items Lead
These implementation strategies have been developed to accomplish the plan’s Corridor-Wide Land Use Based Code) to Work with community and
Outcome 1: Access to Community Health Solutions stakeholders to amend
Future Projects the Walkable Urban
Outcomes and are complimented with policies to guide more specific actions that are needed to Outcome 2: Access to Recreation
Health Strategy Specific Policies: Code (Chapter 13) of the
Codes PDD
Outcome 3: Access to Healthy Food Phoenix Zoning Ordinance
effectively implement each Strategy. LU 1.1: Reduce vehicular parking to incorporate South
Outcome 1: Strong and Resilient Local Businesses minimums to prioritize people arriving Central “Character Area”
Outcome 2: Invest in Quality Education by walking, biking and using transit. Development Standards.
E.D.
Guide and evaluate all future
Outcome 3: Financially Empowered Residents development proposals
LU 1.2: Support the next increment of Operations towards compliance with PDD
Outcome 1: Equitable Transportation Choices development intensity and scale.
STRATEGY SPECIFIC 5-YEAR ACTION ITEMS the Walkable Urban Code
Outcome 2: Right-Sized Parking Development Standards.
Mobility LU 1.3: Require people oriented Create an english/spanish
Outcome 3: Safe and Walkable Block Pattern brochure on the Walkable
IMPLEMENTATION
Five-Year Action items outline steps for jump-starting the implementation of the community’s frontages and open space that
Urban Code and it’s
Outcome 1: Be Water Wise Knowledge PDD
maximize trees, shade, and heat usefulness as a tool for
prioritized investments. The Policies and Actions enhance the South Central TOD Community Plan’s Outcome 2: Beat the Heat relief. walkable developments. equitable transit oriented
G.S. communities.
effectiveness as a tool for achieving the Corridor-Wide Outcomes; however, implementation Outcome 3: Clean Air Make More
partners are encouraged to frequently refer back to the Vision for a more complete and nuanced
HOW WE GET THERE
DESARROLLO ECONÓMICO USO DEL TERRENO VIVIENDA SISTEMAS VERDES MOVILIDAD SALUD
• 59% de las respuestas consideraron el desarrollo económico como 94% de las respuestas estaban relacionadas al uso del terreno, • 15% de las respuestas identificaron a la vivienda como parte de 72% de las respuestas identificaron a los parques como una • 60% de las respuestas identificaron las necesidades relacionadas a • 22% de las respuestas identificaron mejoras relacionadas a la
understanding of the community’s hopes for the future.
parte de sus metas personales. en términos de nuevos espacios para proporcionar oportunidades sus metas personales. oportunidad de recreación que se está perdiendo en su comunidad. movilidad en la comunidad para mejorar su calidad de vida. salud como mejoras necesarias para el futuro de la avenida
• Las metas estaban relacionadas principalmente al empleo, recreativas de calidad para su comunidad. • Las metas incluían ser dueños de casa, mejorar la calidad de sus • Se identificaron necesidades de seguridad y mejoramiento del Central.
incluyendo encontrar/mantener un trabajo u obtener más casas actuales, y la expectativa de quedarse en su casa actual/ alumbrado público como respuestas relacionadas a movilidad, • Todas las respuestas estaban relacionadas a realizar mejoras en
educación para tener mejores oportunidades de trabajo. vecindario actual (resistencia a ser desplazado). así como mantenimiento de la calle y mejorar el tráfico. la limpieza de la avenida Central.
204 HOW WE GET THERE • Otras metas incluyen alcanzar seguridad financiera. HOW WE GET THERE 205
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




Measurable Outcomes help focus execution and provide a learning tool for evaluating progress
MEASURABLE OUTCOMES and informing policy adjustments over time. The following “Measurable Outcomes” are founded
and in alignment with the Corridor-wide vision themes and help to organize performance measures
CORRIDOR-WIDE within the six planning element framework.




Land Use Housing Economic Health Mobility Green
Development Systems


Outcome 1: 15-minute city Outcome 1: Preserve Outcome 1: Strong and Outcome 1: Access to Outcome 1: Equitable Outcome 1: Be Water
Everyone can meet most, if not Neighborhood Resilient Local Businesses Community Health Transportation Choices Wise Water equals life. New
all, of their needs within a short Affordability A careful mix Small locally owned businesses Solutions Creation of social Shift away from reliance on ways of capturing, reusing, and
walk, bike ride, or transit ride of housing choices that meet take pride and build, strong and physical environments that private automobiles and appreciating our connection to
from their home. the needs of the people without unique, authentic community promote good health for all embracing a connected water makes us resilient.
Page 428 compromising neighborhood resiliency while supporting residents. network of reliable public
Outcome 2: Incremental growth and prosperity for all. local culture, value, and transportation choices for all. Outcome 2: Beat the Heat
Growth and Development growth. Outcome 2: Access to If you shade it, they will walk.
Guiding growth in a respectful Outcome 2: Recreation More than just Outcome 2: Right-Sized Trees and shade offset urban
and responsible way to Neighborhood Diversity Outcome 2: Invest in proximity, access involves Streets and Parking Private heat island impacts and
ensure development without Mixed-income, mixed Quality Education The future removing physical, financial, automobiles take up precious reconnect people to nature.
displacement. demographic, and mixed of the world is in the classroom and social barriers and making land area that can be used for
age and mixed housing types today. open space usable for all more equitable investments Outcome 3: Clean Air
Outcome 3: Honoring our provide cultural vibrancy. residents they serve. to meet the needs of existing Make More Nothing smells
Stories Home is where the Outcome 3: Financially residents. Safety of people better than a breath of fresh
Art is. Every culture has a story Outcome 3: Beautiful Empowered Residents Outcome 3: Access to shall be prioritized over air. Good air quality is critical
and the Arts are one of the most Neighborhoods Beautiful Empower residents with Healthy Food Strong local vehicular level of service. to community, economic, and
effective ways to express it. neighborhoods for beautiful personal choices while and regional food economies environmental health and
people, places, and culture. maintaining a competitive position all residents for health Outcome 3: Safe and prosperity.
workforce within key and prosperity. Walkable Block Pattern
employment sectors. Smaller blocks, pedestrian
scaled frontages, and wide
shaded sidewalks create an
equitable sense of place.



206 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 207
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




The first six (6) Corridor-wide strategies are aligned to each of the six (6) planning elements
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES and derived from national best practice research, local collaborative design guidelines, and the
Community vision to “reject displacement” and “support equitable TOD”. These strategies focus on
SHORT-TERM ELEMENT SPECIFIC ETOD STRATEGIES + POLICIES shorter term community revitalization to benefit existing residents first.


STRATEGY 1: STRATEGY 1: STRATEGY 1: STRATEGY 1: STRATEGY 1: STRATEGY 1:
Apply the Walkable Enhance the Cultivate Improve Community Apply Best Practice Apply Best Practice
Green Infrastructure,
Urban Code (Form- Efficiency and Community Experiences + Access Active Transportation Shade, + Heat Relief
Land Use Based Code) to Housing Quality of Existing Economic Economic Growth Health to People Oriented Mobility Standards to Future Green
Development Systems
Standards to Future
Future Projects Housing and Prosperity Spaces Projects Projects




Page 429




Strategy Specific Policies: Strategy Specific Policies: Strategy Specific Policies: Strategy Specific Policies: Strategy Specific Policies: Strategy Specific Policies:
LU 1.1: Reduce vehicular parking H 1.1: Pursue a Naturally Occurring ED 1.1: Expand business financial HE 1.1: Support a pedestrian MO 1.1: Support active GS 1.1: Provide residents with low
minimums to prioritize people arriving Affordable Housing (NOAH) Fund to support programs and resources. infrastructure network that is well- transportation enhancements through cost trees, gardening, and water wise
by walking, biking and using transit. finance the purchase of NOAH units connected to open spaces. the development review process. programs and resources.
at-risk of displacement. ED 1.2: Support skilled trade HE 1.2: Encourage the use of mid
LU 1.2: Support the next increment of education programs through MO 1.2: Development projects shall GS 1.2: Pursue funding for public and
block crossings and pedestrian paseos not have a negative effect on existing
development intensity and scale. H 1.2: Support rehabilitation and/ partnerships with construction firms, through the development process private green infrastructure projects.
or conversion of existing structures to schools, and labor unions. and/or proposed active transportation
to improve connectivity for people infrastructure.
LU 1.3: Require people oriented provide quality housing. walking. GS 1.3: Support partnerships
frontages and open space that ED 1.3: Support policy and code to implement community-based
HE 1.3: Require people oriented MO 1.3: Guide large development
maximize trees, shade, and heat relief. H 1.3: Prioritize rental and owner reform that reduces barriers for local bioswales and curb cuts, at schools,
frontages with storefronts, patios, and proposals toward mutually beneficial
walkable developments. rehabilitation assistance programs. and small-scale developers. churches, and anchor institutions.
porches (walk-up units/businesses). active transportation infrastructure.
OUTCOMES IMPACTED OUTCOMES IMPACTED OUTCOMES IMPACTED OUTCOMES IMPACTED OUTCOMES IMPACTED OUTCOMES IMPACTED
15-Minute City x Preserve Neighborhood Strong and Resilient Local Access to Community Health Equitable Transportation
x x x x Be Water Wise x
Affordability Businesses Solutions Choices
Incremental Growth and
Development
x Invest in Quality Education x Right-Sized Parking x
Neighborhood Diversity x Access to Recreation x Beat the Heat x
Financially Empowered Safe and Walkable Block
Honoring Our Stories x Neighborhood Beautification x Residents
x Access to Healthy Food x x Clean Air Make More x
Pattern

208 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 209
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




The next six (6) Corridor-wide strategies are similarly aligned to each of the six (6) planning
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES elements and derived from national best practice research, local collaborative design guidelines,
and the Community vision to “reject displacement” and “support equitable TOD”. These strategies
LONG-TERM ELEMENT SPECIFIC ETOD STRATEGIES + POLICIES focus on longer term community revitalization to benefit existing and future residents.


STRATEGY 2: STRATEGY 2: STRATEGY 2: STRATEGY 2:
STRATEGY 2: STRATEGY 2:
Develop an Construct Develop a Develop and adopt
Improve Community Support Innovative
South Central
Innovative ETOD Corridor Branding new ETOD street Building and Clean
ETOD Housing Access to Health and
Land Use Infrastructure Housing Economic and Marketing Health Mobility typologies and Green Energy System
Demonstration Development Food Services Systems
Financing Tool Program design standards Projects
Projects




Page 430




Strategy Specific Policies: Strategy Specific Policies: Strategy Specific Policies: Strategy Specific Policies: Strategy Specific Policies: Strategy Specific Policies:
LU 2.1: Support the research and trial H 2.1: Evaluate new housing ED 2.1: Support and help to expand HE 2.1: Explore partnerships to MO 2.1: Explore new street GS 2.1: Encourage large land
of new infrastructure financing tools proposals “fit” understanding that 2/3 the “Buy South Central” marketing provide additional health services. typologies that prioritize pedestrian owners to provide district stormwater
and resources. of existing renters fall below 30% AMI. campaign. and micro mobility “level of service”. management.
HE 2.2: Support health, cultural, and
LU 2.2: Build local knowledge/ H 2.2: Explore appropriately scaled ED 2.2: Support opportunities for art events and education along South MO 2.2: Explore best practices GS 2.2: Encourage large commercial
capacity on structured funds, new housing infill in traditional and youth empowerment through City Central Avenue. and guidelines for vehicular parking and industrial building owners to install
improvement districts, and in lieu fees. established neighborhoods. programs and resources. locations in TOD areas. solar panels on rooftops and shade
HE 2.3: Pursue safe and equitable structures.
LU 2.3: Research and pursue an H 2.3: Support ETOD Housing ED 2.3: Encourage hiring South access from the Rio Salado Station MO 2.3: Research and pursue
innovative infrastructure fund that proposals with innovative and creative Central Corridor residents in City or to the new Arizona Fresh: Agri-food adoption of guidelines inspired by GS 2.3: Support LEED certified
combines multiple sources of capital. financing tools and resources. City-supported projects and programs. Innovation Center. NACTO guidelines. buildings and sites.

OUTCOMES IMPACTED OUTCOMES IMPACTED OUTCOMES IMPACTED OUTCOMES IMPACTED OUTCOMES IMPACTED OUTCOMES IMPACTED
15-Minute City x Preserve Neighborhood Strong and Resilient Local Access to Community Health Equitable Transportation
x x x x Be Water Wise x
Affordability Businesses Solutions Choices
Incremental Growth and
Development
x Invest in Quality Education x Right-Sized Parking x
Neighborhood Diversity x Access to Recreation x Beat the Heat x
Financially Empowered Safe and Walkable Block
Honoring Our Stories x Neighborhood Beautification x Residents
x Access to Healthy Food x x Clean Air Make More x
Pattern

210 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 211
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



The South Central Collaborative and SoPho Convening partners worked with the City to build local
FROM STRATEGIES TO ACTION capacity by holding a Local Developers Convening focused on policy building, infrastructure needs,
and design guideline considerations guided by recommendations made throughout the planning
BUILDING CAPACITY AND CELEBRATING EARLY ACHIEVEMENTS process as well as a common understanding of the community vision.

The South Central Local Developers Convening Recommendations:
Collaborative Support a Collaborative Approach Money Talks
The Collaborative consists of • Create partnerships to educate community members • Provide developers and partners with more gap
over 40 partnerships between on affordable housing funding sources, financial financing and predevelopment tools to create
local leaders, businesses, and constraints, and public programs to prepare for affordable housing projects.
organizations of the South Central implementation. • Create a South Central Corridor infrastructure
Corridor. At its core, the South • Expand developer mentorship programs to empower strategy and policy and a community benefit fund to
Central Collaborative (SCC) local residents and business owners to own and provide partial funding for offsite improvements and
provides a space for diverse develop property. allow developers to utilize the fund to reach deeper
leaders in emerging communities levels of housing affordability.
to share resources to ensure the Get in the Zone
outcome of the South Central • Implement a form-based code to remove density Cracking the Codes
The resident-driven collaborative team already building barriers, allow for additional dwelling units in single- • Update city-wide policies, codes, standards,
Light Rail Project is inclusive
and responds directly to the capacity and celebrating early implementation. family zones such as ADU’s, and to allow more units and guidelines to create more flexibility across
community’s needs. Throughout at all income levels. all departments in implementing Transit Oriented
the project their group has hosted several partnering meetings, operated 4 sub-groups, provided • Create a no “level of service” zone in TOD areas Development (TOD) and walkability.
Page 431
recommendation documents on light rail design, presented development guideline recommendations to to prioritize pedestrian safety over vehicular
the South Central TOD Steering Committee, and continues to build capacity between the local community. throughput/flow.



Having an “Eye on Implementation”
The following community led examples highlight some
early successes in the Corridor that were achieved
prior to and throughout the ongoing planning efforts.
Local leaders met with City officials to establish the
first City of Phoenix bioswale maintenance agreement,
an innovative stormwater management demonstration
program which created and maintains five bioswales
in South Phoenix. Through organized community
involvement Valley Metro, AECOM and Kiewit
were required to create Workforce Development Bio Swale Agreement Hire Local Youth Empowerment
programs throughout the South Central Corridor to
hire local businesses, contractors and residents to
work on the South Central Light Rail Project. Design
Empowerment PHX continually hosts programs for
local youth leadership building to promote a culture
of collaboration through restorative community
design practices that connect, educate, inspire, and
empower South Phoenix residents.

212 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 213
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



The Action Plan outlines strategy-specific actions to jump-start implementation towards
achieving the vision. Each strategy-specific action item is assigned to a lead partner -
HOW TO TAKE ACTION NOW! Government, Community or Business - and is also identified with a type of implementation tool
such as Codes, Financing, Knowledge, Plans, Operations, Partnerships, or “I PlanPHX”.
TOWARDS ACHIEVING THE VISION

STEP 1: STEP 2: STEP 3: STEP 4: STEP 5:
Identify what Planning Identify what Type of Identify what Type of Identify an Action to Identify City Department(s) best
Element(s) align to your Implementation Partner Implementation Tool(s) begin executing now. equipped to provide subject matter
Organization’s Mission. your Organization is. your organization uses. support, knowledge, and resources.



STRATEGY 1: The Lead Partner icons indicates the type of City Dept.
Apply the Walkable organization that is most suitable to lead and/ # Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items Resource
Urban Code (Form- or be responsible for the implementation of
Land Use Based Code) to Strategy Specific Actions. Engage and educate property owners and neighborhood associations
1 Knowledge PDD
Future Projects on the Walkable Urban Code intent and development standards.
Engage with elected officials, city management, and city boards and
Lead Partner
2 “I PlanPHX” commission members on the importance of advocating and supporting PDD
Government including
the local, state, and the Walkable Urban Code in South Central.
Element Specific
Strategy towards federal agencies. Partner with design students or professionals to conceptualize the South
achieving the
3 Partnerships PDD
Page 432 Mountain Village Core as an ETOD Urban Center.
community vision.
Engage local design and development professionals on development
4 Partnerships PDD
incentives to encourage development without displacement.
Lead Partner
Community including
non-profits, foundations,
schools, neighborhood “I PlanPHX” are items that residents can do right now to Planning and Development Department (PDD)
associations and implement the vision and play a direct role in shaping Community and Economic Development
individual residents. Phoenix’s future.
Strategy Specific Policies: Department (CEDD)
LU 1.1: Reduce vehicular parking Code Tools are regulations, such as the zoning ordinance, that can Housing Department (HD)
Strategy Specific minimums to prioritize people arriving encourage or discourage different patterns and forms of urban
Policies guide by walking, biking and using transit. development. Street Transportation Department (ST)
Lead Partner
the resource Business including Water Services Department (WSD)
LU 1.2: Support the next increment of Financing Tools refer to grants, loans, bonds, taxes, and government
decisions needed banks, developers,
development intensity and scale. funding programs.
to implement the private companies, large Office of Environmental Programs (OEP)
Element-Specific LU 1.3: Require people oriented Knowledge Tools means capacity building forums, professional
corporations and small Office of Heat Response and Mitigation (OHRM)
Strategy. frontages and open space that training, and seminars to technical understanding.
maximize trees, shade, and heat relief.
businesses. Office of Arts and Culture (OAC)
Plan Tools include engineering studies, best practices research,
OUTCOMES IMPACTED redevelopment areas, market analyses and other similar documents. Neighborhood Services Department (NSD)
Outcomes indicate 15-Minute City x Public Transit Department (PTD)
Operations Tools are management practices such as inter-depart-
the measurable
Incremental Growth and mental coordination, decision-making transparency and approaches Parks and Recreation Department (PRD)
community benefits x
Development to service delivery.
that the Strategy Human Services Department (HSD)
impacts. Honoring Our Stories x Partnership Tools are mutually beneficial agreements between two
or more parties such as joint use agreements, development agreements All City Departments (ALL)
or corporate sponsorships.
214 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 215
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




The Land Use Element Actions are intended to guide the spatial pattern of development, including
LAND USE ELEMENT ACTIONS intensity, design, and building form towards achieving the Community vision to “reject displacement”
and “support equitable TOD”.
STRATEGY SPECIFIC FIVE (5) YEAR ACTIONS

Lead Partner Lead Partner
STRATEGY 1: STRATEGY 2: Government including the local, state, and federal agencies.
Government including the local, state, and federal agencies.
Apply the Walkable Develop an
City Dept. City Dept.
Urban Code (Form- # Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items Innovative ETOD # Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items Lead(s)
Lead(s)
Land Use Based Code) to Land Use Infrastructure
Work with community and stakeholders to amend the Walkable Pursue an infrastructure needs assessment map to pursue
Future Projects Financing Tool 1 Plans PDD
Urban Code (Chapter 13) of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance eligible local, regional, and federal funds.
1 Codes PDD
to incorporate South Central “Character Area” Development
Coordinate with regional and state agencies to plan future
Standards.
2 Partnerships infrastructure in alignment with vision for the Rio Reimagined ALL
Guide and evaluate all future development proposals towards
area.
2 Operations compliance with the Walkable Urban Code Development PDD
Standards. Pilot an ETOD infrastructure “in lieu” fee for developments
3 Operations PDD
Create an english/spanish brochure on the Walkable Urban requesting increased entitlement up to the Place Type incentive.
3 Knowledge Code and it’s usefulness as a tool for equitable transit oriented PDD Implement the Mobility Improvement Programs recommended
4 Operations ST
communities. infrastructure projects as resource become available.
Identify development standards and incentives to encourage Lead Partner
4 Codes PDD, OAC
public art enhancements on private buildings and sites. Community including non-profits, foundations, schools, neighborhood
associations and individual residents.
Lead Partner
Community including non-profits, foundations, schools, neighborhood Action
Page 433 # Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items Support*
associations and individual residents.
Action Create a flyer to encourage the use of Proposition 400 funds
# Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items Support* 1 Operations for the South Central Corridor regional destination infrastructure ALL
Engage and educate property owners and neighborhood improvements.
1 Knowledge associations on the Walkable Urban Code intent and PDD Lobby for the ability to utilize Tax Increment Financing (TIF)
2 Operations CEDD
development standards. as a tool to foster equitable transit oriented development.
Strategy Specific Policies: Engage with elected officials, city management, and city boards Strategy Specific Policies:
Lead Partner
LU 1.1: Reduce vehicular parking 2 “I PlanPHX” and commission members on the importance of advocating and PDD LU 2.1: Support the research and trial Business including banks, developers, private companies, large corporations
minimums to prioritize people arriving supporting the Walkable Urban Code in South Central. of new infrastructure financing tools and small businesses.
by walking, biking and using transit. Partner with design students or professionals to conceptualize and resources. Action
3 Partnerships PDD # Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items
the South Mountain Village Core as an ETOD Urban Center. Support*
LU 1.2: Support the next increment of Engage local design and development professionals on LU 2.2: Build local knowledge/ Hold a property and business owners workshop on
development intensity and scale. 4 Partnerships development incentives to encourage development without PDD capacity on structured funds, 1 Knowledge Improvement Districts for financing enhanced infrastructure and CEDD
displacement. improvement districts, and in lieu fees. services.
LU 1.3: Require people oriented Engage Anchor Institutions and large property owners on
Lead Partner
frontages and open space that Business including banks, developers, private companies, large corporations LU 2.3: Research and pursue an opportunities to develop mutually beneficial infrastructure, such
2 Partnerships CEDD
and small businesses. as but not limited to district parking facilities, micro-mobility
maximize trees, shade, and heat relief. innovative infrastructure fund that
Action share stations, or district energy.
# Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items combines multiple sources of capital.
Support* *The listed City department is available to provide subect matter support, knowledge, and
Participate in a community forum to identify, recommend, and possible resources for actions led by Business or Community Partners.
OUTCOMES IMPACTED OUTCOMES IMPACTED
1 Partnerships encourage the city adoption of new development incentives to PDD
15-Minute City x encourage development without displacement. 15-Minute City x City Lead Department Abbreviations: Planning and Development Department (PDD); Community and
Incremental Growth and Create an evaluation score card to reveal the trade-offs of Economic Development Department (CEDD); Housing Department (HD); Street Transportation
x 2 Knowledge developing under the Walkable Urban Code vs. conventional PDD
Incremental Growth and Department (ST); Water Services Department (WSD); Office of Environmental Programs (OEP); Office of
Development Development
x
zoning. Heat Response and Mitigation (OHRM); Office of Arts and Culture (OAC); Neighborhood Services
Department (NSD); Public Transit Department (PTD); Parks and Recreation Department (PRD); Human
Honoring Our Stories x 3 Partnerships Build a walkable urban mixed use demonstration project. PDD Honoring Our Stories x Services Department (HSD); All City Departments (ALL)
*The listed City department is available to provide subect matter support, knowledge, and
possible resources for actions led by Business or Community Partners.
216 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 217
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




The Housing Element Actions are intended to enhance existing housing and guide new housing
HOUSING ELEMENT ACTIONS demonstrations to preserve affordability, diversity, and quality while making progress towards
achieving the Community vision to “reject displacement” and “support equitable TOD”.
STRATEGY SPECIFIC FIVE (5) YEAR ACTIONS

STRATEGY 1: Lead Partner STRATEGY 2: Lead Partner
Government including the local, state, and federal agencies. Construct Government including the local, state, and federal agencies.
Enhance the
City Dept. South Central City Dept.
Efficiency and # Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items # Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items
Lead(s) ETOD Housing Lead(s)
Housing Quality of Existing Housing Demonstration
Hold a community meeting to share and target existing and Conduct an affordable housing gap analysis and track new
Housing 1 Knowledge future Rental and Owner Rehabilitation Assistance Programs to NSD Projects 1 Operations or preserved ownership and rental units for residents/families HD
South Central Corridor communities most at risk of displacement and at various income ranges.
Engage Arizona Department of Environmental Quality and the Evaluate and Initiate a Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment to
2 Partnerships EPA on indoor air quality measurement and vapor intrusion OEP 2 Codes allow interior suites, ADUs, and manufactured homes in South PDD
mitigation assistance. Central.
Evaluate the feasibility of allocating and prioritizing project Issue an RFP to develop an affordable housing project that
3 Operations based vouchers within the south central corridor for residents at HD 3 Operations helps address production goals for rental and ownership NSD, HD
risk of displacement and/or falling below 30-50% AMI. opportunities.
Lead Partner
Research and identify incentives such as expedited plan
Community including non-profits, foundations, schools, neighborhood 4 Operations review, fee reductions, pre-approved plans, etc. for affordable PDD
associations and individual residents. housing projects.
Action Lead Partner
# Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items Support* Community including non-profits, foundations, schools, neighborhood
associations and individual residents.
Page 434
Pursue a Naturally Occurring Affordable Housing (NOAH)
1 Operations Fund to finance and purchase NOAH units at risk of HD Action
displacement. # Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items Support*
Create a community-led recognition program to acknowledge Engage and educate property owners and neighborhood
2 “I PlanPHX” community supportive housing projects in alignment with the NSD, HD 1 Knowledge associations on the benefits of Accessory Dwelling Units PDD
community vision. (ADUs) and other “Missing Middle Housing” typologies.
Strategy Specific Policies: Pilot an ETOD Rehabilitation fund; graduate this effort to a Strategy Specific Policies: Research the appropriateness for the use of Community Benefit
3 Partnerships NSD, HD 2 Knowledge CEDD
H 1.1: Pursue and support community land trust. H 2.1: Evaluate new housing Agreements (CBA) between developers and the broader
preservation and protection of proposals “fit” understanding that 2/3 community.
Naturally Occurring Affordable Lead Partner of existing renters fall below 30% AMI. Actively support Zoning and code reform that allows for
Business including banks, developers, private companies, large corporations 3 “I PlanPHX” building types that provide paths to homeownership such as PDD
Housing (NOAH) and small businesses. ADUs, Tiny Homes, Duplexes, Triplexes, Fourplexes.
Action H 2.2: Explore appropriately scaled
# Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items Create a recognition program for developers of innovative
H 1.2: Support rehabilitation and/ Support* new housing typologies in traditional 4 “I PlanPHX” NSD, HD
housing demonstration projects.
or conversion of existing structures to Hold/Participate in an Affordable Housing Developers forums and established neighborhoods.
provide quality housing. 1 Partnerships to explore creative solutions and partnerships to provide housing HD Lead Partner

for residents that fall at or below 30-50% AMI. H 2.3: Support ETOD Housing Business including banks, developers, private companies, large corporations
and small businesses.
H 1.3: Prioritize rental and owner Partner with nonprofit organizations and businesses to renovate proposals with innovative and creative Action
rehabilitation assistance programs. 2 Partnerships or rehabilitate single family houses and/or small multifamily NSD, HD financing tools and resources. # Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items Support*
projects.
1 Partnerships Develop a mixed-use, mixed-income housing project. HD
OUTCOMES IMPACTED *The listed City department is available to provide subect matter support, knowledge, and OUTCOMES IMPACTED
possible resources for actions led by Business or Community Partners. Develop a live-work and/or Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
2 Partnerships PDD, HD
Preserve Neighborhood Preserve Neighborhood housing demonstration project.
Affordability
x City Lead Department Abbreviations: Planning and Development Department (PDD); Community and x Partner with financial institutions to provide grants and
Economic Development Department (CEDD); Housing Department (HD); Street Transportation Affordability
3 Partnerships low-interest loans to help finance local developers pre- HD
Department (ST); Water Services Department (WSD); Office of Environmental Programs (OEP); Office of development expenses.
Neighborhood Diversity x Neighborhood Diversity x
Heat Response and Mitigation (OHRM); Office of Arts and Culture (OAC); Neighborhood Services
Department (NSD); Public Transit Department (PTD); Parks and Recreation Department (PRD); Human *The listed City department is available to provide subect matter support, knowledge, and
Neighborhood Beautification x Services Department (HSD); All City Departments (ALL) Neighborhood Beautification x possible resources for actions led by Business or Community Partners.


218 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 219
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




The Economic Development Element Actions are intended to guide the financial prosperity of
ECON. DEV. ELEMENT ACTIONS businesses and residents towards achieving the Community vision to “reject displacement” and
“support equitable TOD”.
STRATEGY SPECIFIC FIVE (5) YEAR ACTIONS

STRATEGY 1: Lead Partner STRATEGY 2: Lead Partner
Government including the local, state, and federal agencies. Government including the local, state, and federal agencies.
Cultivate Develop a
City Dept. City Dept.
Community # Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items Corridor Branding # Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items
Lead(s) Lead(s)
Economic Economic Growth Economic and Marketing
Development Research the feasibility of expanding or creating redevelopment Development Update “Opportunity Zone” marketing materials to reference
and Prosperity 1 Operations CEDD Program 1 Operations CEDD
areas and other development incentives in the corridor. the South Central ETOD Community Vision and Master Plan.
Research, identify, and reduce zoning barriers to encourage Develop Small Business Attraction marketing materials and
2 Codes ground floor leasable areas supportive of smaller businesses, PDD 2 Operations resources to help small businesses and entrepreneurs locate CEDD
business incubators, maker spaces, art spaces, local start-ups. existing neighborhood scale commercial spaces.
Research the feasibility of expanding the Neighborhood
Identify innovative practices to target existing residents for jobs,
3 Operations All 3 Operations Commercial Revitalization (NCR) program to support NSD
training, education, grants, scholarships + workforce programs.
enhancements in alignment with the TOD community vision(s).
Research, identify, and reduce zoning, licensing, and other Highlight the economic benefits of the corridors unique natural
4 Codes regulatory barriers for temporary and mobile retailers, micro- PDD 4 Operations CEDD
resources through marketing and business attraction materials.
businesses, urban farming, and outdoor markets. Strongly encourage public art as part of city infrastructure and CEDD,
Develop marketing materials to attract an advanced 5 Operations
development projects. OAC
5 Operations manufacturing incubator/accelerator, small business incubator, CEDD
and/or “maker space” to the South Central Corridor. Lead Partner
Community including non-profits, foundations, schools, neighborhood
Page 435
Lead Partner associations and individual residents.
Community including non-profits, foundations, schools, neighborhood Action
associations and individual residents. # Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items Support*
Action
# Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items Partner and identify ways to support the expansion of existing
Support* 1 Partnerships CEDD
employers in key south central industries.
Partner with workforce development agencies to provide Complete a “love your block” grant application for a
1 Partnerships training opportunities, resume writing, and interview classes at CEDD 2 Partnerships NSD
Strategy Specific Policies: Strategy Specific Policies: neighborhood improvement project such as tree plantings.
community centers and schools. Host a buy local event to support local small businesses and
ED 1.1: Expand business financial 2 Financing Support grant opportunities for business incubators. CEDD ED 2.1: Support and help to expand 3 “I PlanPHX” CEDD
walking, biking, transit riding in the corridor.
support programs and resources. Identify financial and resource support to expand the youth and the “Buy/Hire South Central”
3 Partnerships OAC Lead Partner
design empowerment programs in the corridor. marketing campaigns.
ED 1.2: Support skilled trade Encourage South Central local artists participation and Business including banks, developers, private companies, large corporations
and small businesses.
education programs through 4 Partnerships application in city-wide artist talent pools, programs, and OAC ED 2.2: Support opportunities for
resources. Action
partnerships with construction firms, youth empowerment through City # Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items Support*
schools, and labor unions. Lead Partner
programs and resources.
Hold a business forum to explore the potential to establish a
Business including banks, developers, private companies, large corporations 1 Partnerships Phoenix Business Improvement District in each station area, CEDD
ED 1.3: Support policy and code and small businesses. ED 2.3: Promote South Central with the districts coordinated by a Corridor Business Council.
reform that reduces barriers for local Action as a unique and cultural regional
# Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items Support efforts to organize local business and community
and small-scale developers. Support* destination. 2 Partnerships networking events through temporary outdoor markets and CEDD
Hold a small business owners forum to explore the creation of a pop up sales events.
1 Knowledge CEDD
OUTCOMES IMPACTED South Central local and small business association. *The listed City department is available to provide subect matter support, knowledge, and
OUTCOMES IMPACTED
Support an educational forum to build skills for aspiring possible resources for actions led by Business or Community Partners.
Strong and Resilient Local 2 Partnerships CEDD Strong and Resilient Local
x developers. x
Businesses Businesses City Lead Department Abbreviations: Planning and Development Department (PDD); Community and
Coordinate a meeting of local and small business owners to Economic Development Department (CEDD); Housing Department (HD); Street Transportation
Invest in Quality Education x 3 Knowledge provide knowledge and support on business financial literacy, CEDD Invest in Quality Education x Department (ST); Water Services Department (WSD); Office of Environmental Programs (OEP); Office of
Financially Empowered marketing, security, and other business improvement practices. Heat Response and Mitigation (OHRM); Office of Arts and Culture (OAC); Neighborhood Services
Financially Empowered
x x Department (NSD); Public Transit Department (PTD); Parks and Recreation Department (PRD); Human
Residents *The listed City department is available to provide subect matter support, knowledge, and Residents Services Department (HSD); All City Departments (ALL)
possible resources for actions led by Business or Community Partners.
220 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 221
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




The Health Element Actions are intended to guide key aspects of the built environment that impact
HEALTH ELEMENT ACTIONS public health, including access to health services, healthy food, and people oriented spaces towards
achieving the Community vision to “reject displacement” and “support equitable TOD”.
STRATEGY SPECIFIC FIVE (5) YEAR ACTIONS

STRATEGY 1: Lead Partner Lead Partner
Government including the local, state, and federal agencies. STRATEGY 2: Government including the local, state, and federal agencies.
Improve Community
City Dept. Improve Community City Dept.
Experiences + Access # Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items # Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items
Lead(s) Access to Health and Lead(s)
Health to People Oriented Health
Evaluate the potential to expand transit coverage, particularly Food Services Work with community partners to further identify south central
Spaces 1 Operations PTD, PRD
connecting from the Light Rail to South Mountain Park/Preserve. 1 Partnerships community health service needs for those at highest risk of HSD
Research Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design displacement.
2 Codes PD, PDD
(CPTED) principles intersection with the Walkable Urban Code. Identify city owned property that could be utilized for
Pursue funding to construct jogging/walking paths, art, and 2 Operations increased access to healthy food, such as, farmer’s market, ALL
3 Financing ST, OAC
lighting along the Western and Highline Canals. community kitchens, gardens, food cooperatives, etc.
Pursue funding improvements such as pathways, lighting, Research and identify bonus point provisions to encourage
3 Codes PDD
4 Financing drinking fountains, community gardens, art, and shade in all ALL developments to incorporate healthy food access.
public parks and open spaces; particularly the Rio Salado. Research and identify code constraints preventing vacant
Evaluate new development proposals influence on warrants 4 Codes land owners from allowing temporary pop-up parks on their PDD
5 Operations ST, PDD
needed to pursue mid block crossing interventions. properties.
Identify mobility needs connecting the Rio Salado Station to PRD, PTD,
Lead Partner 5 Operations
Community including non-profits, foundations, schools, neighborhood the new Arizona Fresh: Agri-food Innovation Center. PDD
associations and individual residents.
Page 436 Lead Partner
Action Community including non-profits, foundations, schools, neighborhood
# Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items Support* associations and individual residents.
Identify community art locations such as vacant sites or Action
1 Operations prominent buildings to support creative place-making, public art, NSD
# Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items Support*
murals and/or events such as street and canal festivals. Hold a healthy communities forum to better understand the city
Organize walking audits to encourage community safety and NSD, ST, 1 Knowledge HSD
2 “I PlanPHX” and community partner health services and resources gaps.
positive activation of neighborhood streets and public spaces. PD Write a grant to support opportunities for increased access
Strategy Specific Policies: Strategy Specific Policies:
Pursue creative financing to enhance and activate the Rio 2 Financing to healthy food, such as, farmer’s market, community kitchen, OEP
HE 1.1: Support a pedestrian 3 Financing PRD HE 2.1: Explore partnerships that
Salado as a recreational destination. community garden, food cooperative, etc.
infrastructure network that is well- provide new health and food services.
Educate residents and youth on the availability and locations to Further define displacement drivers and trends as it relates to
connected to open spaces. 4 Knowledge PTD
acquire reduced fare transit passes. 3 Knowledge housing violence, criminalization, environmental injustice and PDD
HE 1.2: Encourage the use of mid Lead Partner
HE 2.2: Support new developments
zoning.
block crossings and pedestrian paseos Business including banks, developers, private companies, large corporations that integrate community health and Partner with the City of Phoenix through the Phoenix C.A.R.E.S
and small businesses. food services.
through the development process program in targeted areas throughout the corridor to connect
Action 4 Partnerships HSD
to improve connectivity for people # Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items residents experiencing homelessness with services and
Support* HE 2.3: Support investments that resources
walking.
Identify corporate sponsorship opportunities for place making NSD, OAC, improve safe and equitable access
1 Partnerships Lead Partner
HE 1.3: Require people oriented enhancements in close proximity to the light rail stations. CEDD
to existing and planned community Business including banks, developers, private companies, large corporations
frontages with storefronts, patios, and Seek creative ways to promote the Rio Salado and South and small businesses.
2 Partnerships PRD health and food services.
porches (walk-up units/businesses). Mountain Park/Preserve as local and regional attractions. Action
Identify a property that can be used as a temporary popup CEDD, # Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items Support*
OUTCOMES IMPACTED 3 Partnerships OUTCOMES IMPACTED
park/plaza and pursue funding partnerships. NSD, PDD
Research mechanisms to support community health and food
Access to Community Health *The listed City department is available to provide subect matter support, knowledge, and Access to Community Health OEP, CEDD,
x 1 Operations micro-businesses, such as mobile retailers, urban farming, and
Solutions possible resources for actions led by Business or Community Partners. Solutions
x PDD
outdoor markets with regulatory relief and assistance.
City Lead Department Abbreviations: Planning and Development Department (PDD); Community and Gather local health partners to host community health events
Access to Recreation x Economic Development Department (CEDD); Housing Department (HD); Street Transportation Access to Recreation x 2 Partnerships HSD
and mobile clinics to “meet people where they are”.
Department (ST); Water Services Department (WSD); Office of Environmental Programs (OEP); Office of
Access to Healthy Food x Heat Response and Mitigation (OHRM); Office of Arts and Culture (OAC); Neighborhood Services Access to Healthy Food x *The listed City department is available to provide subect matter support, knowledge, and
Department (NSD); Public Transit Department (PTD); Parks and Recreation Department (PRD); Human possible resources for actions led by Business or Community Partners.
Services Department (HSD); All City Departments (ALL)
222 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 223
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




The Mobility Element Actions are intended to guide movement of people and goods, particularly the
MOBILITY ELEMENT ACTIONS availability of quality multi-modal transportation options towards achieving the Community vision to
“reject displacement” and “support equitable TOD”.
STRATEGY SPECIFIC FIVE (5) YEAR ACTIONS

STRATEGY 1: Lead Partner STRATEGY 2: Lead Partner
Government including the local, state, and federal agencies. Government including the local, state, and federal agencies.
Apply Best Practice Develop and adopt
City Dept. City Dept.
Active Transportation # Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items new ETOD street # Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items
Lead(s) Lead(s)
Mobility Standards to Future Mobility typologies and
Pursue funding to identify and pursue best practice Active 1 Operations Update existing Street Design Standards and Guidelines. ST
Projects Transportation enhancements connecting South Central design standards
1 Plan ST Initiate process for evaluating current speed limit policy as it
Corridor light rail stations with “the 7’s” (7th Street and 7th 2 Operations ST
applies in TOD areas.
Avenue).
Evaluate bus ridership/demand and right of way constraints
Create a GIS database of Active Transportation priority 3 Operations for opportunities to improve transit shelters, frequency, and ST, PTD
2 Operations corridors to research, track, and provide progress updates in ST
improved speed and reliability.
alignment with the community vision.
Implement Active Transportation connections to canalscape,
3 Plan light rail, the Rio Salado, and the Village Core through the ST Lead Partner
development process when possible. Community including non-profits, foundations, schools, neighborhood
Propose the expansion of micro mobility programs and look at associations and individual residents.
4 Operations incorporating equity considerations for low income residents ST Action
into the program.
# Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items Support*
Lead Partner
Support and stay involved in the Active Transportation Plan
Page 437
Community including non-profits, foundations, schools, neighborhood efforts to ensure policy recommendations are appropriate and
1 “I PlanPHX” ST
associations and individual residents. in alignment with the South Central ETOD Community Plan and
Action recommendations.
# Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items Support* Engage residents on the benefits of short development blocks
2 Knowledge PDD
Engage annually with youth, residents, schools, and that enable convenient walking, biking, and transit use.
1 Knowledge neighborhood associations on active transportation safety, ST Participate in the national “Park”ing Day events by temporarily ST, PRD,
3 Partnerships
repurposing on-street parking spaces with a pocket park. PDD
Strategy Specific Policies: education, and design decision making. Strategy Specific Policies:
MO 1.1: Support active Continue to identify and prioritize infrastructure improvements MO 2.1: Explore new street
2 “I PlanPHX” that could facilitate a well connected active transportation ST
transportation enhancements through typologies that prioritize pedestrian Lead Partner
network through existing programs. Business including banks, developers, private companies, large corporations
the development review process. and micro mobility “level of service”.
and small businesses.
Lead Partner
MO 1.2: Development projects shall Business including banks, developers, private companies, large corporations MO 2.2: Explore best practices Action
not have a negative effect on existing and small businesses. # Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items
and guidelines for vehicular parking Support*
and/or proposed active transportation Action locations in TOD areas. Support a “shared-street”, “woonerf”, “yield street” or similar
# Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items 1 Partnerships ST, PDD
infrastructure. Support* demonstration project through a private development process.
Pursue partnerships for clusters of active transportation MO 2.3: Research and pursue Provide on-street parking on walkable urban mixed use and
MO 1.3: Guide large development 1 Partnerships ST 2 Partnerships PDD
infrastructure enhancements connecting to transit stations. adoption of guidelines inspired by walkable urban residential projects.
proposals toward mutually beneficial Develop a “car-free” demonstration project in the South Central
Research the appropriateness of using Public-Private NACTO guidelines. 3 Partnerships PDD
Active Transportation infrastructure. 2 Financing CEDD, ST Corridor.
Partnerships (P3s) programs to fund south central priorities.
OUTCOMES IMPACTED OUTCOMES IMPACTED *The listed City department is available to provide subect matter support, knowledge, and
*The listed City department is available to provide subect matter support, knowledge, and
Equitable Transportation possible resources for actions led by Business or Community Partners. Equitable Transportation possible resources for actions led by Business or Community Partners.
Choices
x x
Choices
City Lead Department Abbreviations: Planning and Development Department (PDD); Community and
Right-Sized Parking x Economic Development Department (CEDD); Housing Department (HD); Street Transportation Right-Sized Parking x
Department (ST); Water Services Department (WSD); Office of Environmental Programs (OEP); Office of
Safe and Walkable Block Heat Response and Mitigation (OHRM); Office of Arts and Culture (OAC); Neighborhood Services Safe and Walkable Block
Pattern
x x
Department (NSD); Public Transit Department (PTD); Parks and Recreation Department (PRD); Human Pattern
Services Department (HSD); All City Departments (ALL)
224 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 225
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




The Green Systems Element Actions are intended to guide the site, building, and infrastructure design
GREEN SYS. ELEMENT ACTIONS to improve resource efficiency and environmental protection towards achieving the Community
vision to “reject displacement” and “support equitable TOD”.
STRATEGY SPECIFIC FIVE (5) YEAR ACTIONS

Lead Partner Lead Partner
STRATEGY 1:
Government including the local, state, and federal agencies. STRATEGY 2: Government including the local, state, and federal agencies.
Apply Best Practice
City Dept. Support Innovative
Green Infrastructure, # Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items City Dept.
Lead(s) Building and Clean # Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items
Shade, + Heat Relief Lead(s)
Green Green Energy System
Systems
Standards to Future Determine feasibility of Shade Easements that allow Systems Support the demonstration of innovative building and
Projects
Projects 1 Codes structural shade over public sidewalks without the need PDD 1 Operations clean energy systems at existing and new parks and other ALL
for revocable permits. public facilities.
Encourage sustainability from any project resulting from a Evaluate bus ridership/demand and right of way
2 Operations CEDD
City-Owned RFP site. 2 Operations contraints for opportunities to improve shade and heat PTD, OHRM
Create a property owner guide to green infrastructure relief at and connecting to transit stations and shelters.
3 Knowledge WSD, OEP Evaluate the opportunity to develop a combined heat/
techniques for established neighborhoods.
Monitor the City of Phoenix Bioswale Maintenance power energy source (Eco District) to serve major
3 Operations CEDD
4 Operations ST developments adjacent to the Rio Salado and other
Agreement in South Central.
surrounding properties.
Evaluate the Walkable Urban Code plant list for
PDD, OEP, Evaluate the potential for an Improvement District to
5 Codes opportunities to add native, drought tolerant, and/or 4 Operations CEDD
WSD support innovative building and clean energy projects.
desert adapted species appropriate for TOD areas.
Page 438 Lead Partner
Lead Partner
Community including non-profits, foundations, schools, neighborhood
Community including non-profits, foundations, schools, neighborhood associations and individual residents.
associations and individual residents. Action
# Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items Support*
Action
# Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items Support* Support partnerships with the Audobon Center for
Apply and pursue grants for green infrastructure and heat OEP, 1 Partnerships community education and awareness on innovative PDD
Strategy Specific Policies: 1 “I PlanPHX” Strategy Specific Policies:
relief assistance. OHRM building and clean energy systems.
GS 1.1: Provide residents with low Support creation of a “clean and green team” program GS 2.1: Encourage large land owners Explore the potential to add and expand Youth and
cost trees, gardening, and water wise 2 Partnerships CEDD to provide green district stormwater
for South Central. 2 Partnerships Design Empowerment programs at parks, community and PRD
programs and resources. management. education centers.
Create educational materials on the social, health, and
3 Knowledge ALL
GS 1.2: Pursue funding for public and economic benefits of shaded, safe pedestrian pathways. Lead Partner
GS 2.2: Encourage large commercial Business including banks, developers, private companies, large corporations
private green infrastructure projects. Create educational materials on the importance of native and small businesses.
and industrial building owners to install
4 Knowledge species to support green infrastructure and water wise OEP, WSD
GS 1.3: Support partnerships to solar panels on rooftops and shade Action
communities. # Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items Support*
implement community-based low structures.
impact development (LID) at schools, Construct innovative building and clean energy systems
Lead Partner 1 Partnerships PDD
churches, and anchor institutions (not Business including banks, developers, private companies, large corporations GS 2.3: Support LEED certified demonstration projects.
and small businesses. buildings and sites. Construct innovative water capture and reuse
adjacent to right-of-way). 2 Partnerships PDD
Action demonstration projects.
OUTCOMES IMPACTED # Tools Strategy Specific 5-Year Action Items Support* OUTCOMES IMPACTED *The listed City department is available to provide subect matter support, knowledge, and
Construct innovative green infrastructure and heat relief possible resources for actions led by Business or Community Partners.
Be Water Wise x 1 Partnerships PDD Be Water Wise x
demonstration projects. City Lead Department Abbreviations: Planning and Development Department (PDD); Community and
Hold a professional training forum on financing methods Economic Development Department (CEDD); Housing Department (HD); Street Transportation
Beat the Heat x 2 Knowledge for Green Infrastructure and Low Impact Development WSD, OEP Beat the Heat x Department (ST); Water Services Department (WSD); Office of Environmental Programs (OEP); Office of
(LID). Heat Response and Mitigation (OHRM); Office of Arts and Culture (OAC); Neighborhood Services
Clean Air Make More x Department (NSD); Public Transit Department (PTD); Parks and Recreation Department (PRD); Human
*The listed City department is available to provide subect matter support, knowledge, and
Clean Air Make More x Services Department (HSD); All City Departments (ALL)
possible resources for actions led by Business or Community Partners.
226 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 227
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



The Government Led Action guide is intended to compile all government led action items for ease of
GOVERNMENT ACTION GUIDE use and tracking. “Government” partners including the local, state, and federal agencies.

City Dept. City Dept.
# Tools Government-Led Land Use Element 5-Year Action Items Resource # Tools Government-Led Health Element 5-Year Action Items Resource
STRATEGY 1 (short term): Apply the Walkable Urban Code (Form-Based Code) to Future Projects STRATEGY 1 (short-term): Improve Community Experiences + Access to People Oriented Spaces
Work with community and stakeholders to amend the Walkable Urban Code (Chapter 13) of the Phoenix Evaluate the potential to expand transit coverage, particularly connecting from the Light Rail to South Mountain
1 Codes PDD 1 Operations PTD, PRD
Zoning Ordinance to incorporate South Central “Character Area” Development Standards. Park/Preserve.
Research Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles intersection with the Walkable
Guide and evaluate all future development proposals towards compliance with the Walkable Urban Code 2 Codes PD, PDD
2 Operations PDD Urban Code.
Development Standards.
3 Financing Pursue funding to construct jogging/walking paths, art, and lighting along the Western and Highline Canals. ST, OAC
Create an english/spanish brochure on the Walkable Urban Code and it’s usefulness as a tool for equitable Pursue funding improvements such as pathways, lighting, drinking fountains, community gardens, art, and shade
3 Knowledge PDD
transit oriented communities. 4 Financing ALL
in all public parks and open spaces; particularly the Rio Salado.
Identify development standards and incentives to encourage public art enhancements on private buildings and 5 Operations Evaluate new development proposals influence on warrants needed to pursue mid block crossing interventions. ST, PDD
4 Codes PDD, OAC
sites. STRATEGY 2 (long-term): Improve Community Access to Health and Food Services
STRATEGY 2 (long-term): Develop an Innovative ETOD Infrastructure Financing Tool Work with community partners to further identify south central community health service needs for those at
1 Plans Pursue an infrastructure needs assessment map to pursue eligible local, regional, and federal funds. PDD 1 Partnerships HSD
highest risk of displacement.
Coordinate with regional and state agencies to plan future infrastructure in alignment with visions for the Rio Identify city owned property that could be utilized for increased access to healthy food, such as, farmer’s
2 Partnerships ALL 2 Operations ALL
Reimagined area. market, community kitchens, gardens, food cooperatives, etc.
Pilot an ETOD infrastructure “in lieu” fee for developments requesting increased entitlement up to the incentive in 3 Codes Research and identify bonus point provisions to encourage developments to incorporate healthy food access. PDD
3 Operations PDD
the Place Type. Research and identify code constraints preventing vacant land owners from allowing temporary pop-up parks
4 Codes PDD
4 Operations Implement the Mobility Improvement Programs recommended infrastructure projects as resource become available. ST on their properties.
City Dept. Identify mobility needs connecting the Rio Salado Station to the new Arizona Fresh: Agri-food Innovation PRD, PTD,
# Tools Government-Led Housing Element 5-Year Action Items Resource 5 Operations
Center. PDD
STRATEGY 1 (short-term): Enhance the Efficiency and Quality of Existing Housing
Hold a community meeting to share and target existing and future Rental and Owner Rehabilitation Assistance
1 Knowledge NSD
Programs to South Central Corridor communities City Dept.
Engage Arizona Department of Environmental Quality and the EPA on indoor air quality measurement and # Tools Government-Led Mobility Element 5-Year Action Items Resource
2 Partnerships OEP STRATEGY 1 (short-term): Apply Best Practice Active Transportation Standards to Future Projects
vapor intrusion mitigation assistance.
Evaluate the feasibility of allocating and prioritizing project based vouchers within the south central corridor for Pursue funding to identify and pursue best practice Active Transportation enhancements connecting South
3 Operations HD 1 Plan ST
Page 439 residents at risk of displacement and/or falling below 30-50% AMI. Central Corridor light rail stations with “the 7’s” (7th Street and 7th Avenue).
STRATEGY 2 (long-term): Construct South Central ETOD Housing Demonstration Projects Create a GIS database of Active Transportation priority corridors to research, track, and provide progress
2 Operations ST
updates in alignment with the community vision.
Conduct an affordable housing gap analysis and track new or preserved ownership and rental units for
1 Operations HD Implement Active Transportation connections to canalscape, light rail, the Rio Salado, and the Village Core
residents/families most at risk of displacement and at various income ranges. 3 Plan ST
through the development process when possible.
Evaluate and Initiate a Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment to allow interior suites, ADUs, and manufactured
2 Codes PDD Propose the expansion of micro mobility programs and look at incorporating equity considerations for low
homes in South Central. 4 Operations ST
income residents into the program.
Issue an RFP to develop an affordable housing project that helps address production goals for rental and STRATEGY 2 (long-term): Develop and adopt new ETOD street typologies and design standards
3 Operations NSD, HD
ownership opportunities. 1 Operations Update existing Street Design Standards and Guidelines. ST
Research and identify incentives such as expedited plan review, fee reductions, pre-approved plans, etc. for 2 Operations Initiate process for evaluating current speed limit policy as it applies in TOD areas. ST
4 Operations PDD
affordable housing projects. Evaluate bus ridership/demand and right of way constraints for opportunities to improve transit shelters,
3 Operations ST, PTD
# Tools Government-Led Economic Development Element 5-Year Action Items City Dept. frequency, and improved speed and reliability.
Resource
STRATEGY 1 (short-term): Cultivate Community Economic Growth and Prosperity
Research the feasibility of expanding or creating redevelopment areas and other development incentives in the City Dept.
1 Operations CEDD # Tools Government-Led Mobility Element 5-Year Action Items Resource
corridor.
STRATEGY 1 (short-term): Apply Best Practice Green Infrastructure, Shade, + Heat Relief Standards to Future Projects
Research, identify, and reduce zoning barriers to encourage ground floor leasable areas supportive of smaller
2 Codes PDD Determine feasibility of Shade Easements that allow structural shade over public sidewalks without the need
businesses, business incubators, maker spaces, art spaces, local start-ups. 1 Codes PDD
for revocable permits.
Identify innovative practices to target existing residents for jobs, training, education, grants, scholarships +
3 Operations All 2 Operations Encourage sustainability from any project resulting from a City-Owned RFP site. CEDD
workforce programs.
3 Knowledge Create a property owner guide to green infrastructure techniques for established neighborhoods. WSD, OEP
Research, identify, and reduce zoning, licensing, and other regulatory barriers for temporary and mobile retailers,
4 Codes PDD 4 Operations Monitor the City of Phoenix Bioswale Maintenance Agreement in South Central. ST
micro-businesses, urban farming, and outdoor markets.
Evaluate the Walkable Urban Code plant list for opportunities to add native, drought tolerant, and/or PDD, OEP,
Develop marketing materials to attract an advanced manufacturing incubator/accelerator, small business 5 Codes
5 Operations CEDD desert adapted species appropriate for TOD areas. WSD
incubator, and/or “maker space” to the South Central Corridor.
STRATEGY 2 (long-term): Develop a Corridor Branding and Marketing Program STRATEGY 2 (long-term): Support Innovative Building and Clean Energy System Projects
Update “Opportunity Zone” marketing materials to reference the South Central ETOD Community Vision and Support the demonstration of innovative building and clean energy systems at existing and new parks and
1 Operations CEDD 1 Operations ALL
Master Plan. other public facilities.
Develop Small Business Attraction marketing materials and resources to help small businesses and entrepreneurs Evaluate bus ridership/demand and right of way contraints for opportunities to improve shade and heat
2 Operations CEDD 2 Operations PTD, OHRM
locate existing neighborhood scale commercial spaces. relief at and connecting to transit stations and shelters.
Research the feasibility of expanding the Neighborhood Commercial Revitalization (NCR) program to support Evaluate the opportunity to develop a combined heat/power energy source (Eco District) to serve major
3 Operations CEDD
3 Operations NSD developments adjacent to the Rio Salado and other surrounding properties.
enhancements in alignment with the TOD community vision(s).
4 Operations Evaluate the potential for an Improvement District to support innovative building and clean energy projects. CEDD
Highlight the economic benefits of the corridors unique natural resources through marketing and business
4 Operations CEDD
attraction materials.
CEDD,
5 Operations Strongly encourage public art as part of city infrastructure and development projects.
OAC
228 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 229
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



The Community Led Action guide is intended to compile all community led action items for ease of
COMMUNITY ACTION GUIDE use and tracking. “Community” partners include non-profits, foundations, schools, neighborhood
associations and individual residents.

# Tools Community-Led Land Use Element 5-Year Action Items City Dept. # Tools Community-Led Health Element 5-Year Action Items City Dept.
Resource Resource
STRATEGY 1 (short term): Apply the Walkable Urban Code (Form-Based Code) to Future Projects STRATEGY 1 (short-term): Improve Community Experiences + Access to People Oriented Spaces
Engage and educate property owners and neighborhood associations on the Walkable Urban Code intent Identify community art locations such as vacant sites or prominent buildings to support creative place-making,
1 Knowledge PDD 1 Operations NSD
and development standards. public art, murals and/or events such as street and canal festivals.
Organize walking audits to encourage community safety and positive activation of neighborhood streets and NSD, ST,
Engage with elected officials, city management, and city boards and commission members on the importance 2 “I PlanPHX”
2 “I PlanPHX” PDD public spaces. PD
of advocating and supporting the Walkable Urban Code in South Central.
3 Financing Pursue creative financing to enhance and activate the Rio Salado as a recreational destination. PRD
Partner with design students or professionals to conceptualize the South Mountain Village Core as an ETOD
3 Partnerships PDD 4 Knowledge Educate residents and youth on the availability and locations to acquire reduced fare transit passes. PTD
Urban Center.
Engage local design and development professionals on development incentives to encourage development STRATEGY 2 (long-term): Improve Community Access to Health and Food Services
4 Partnerships PDD Hold a healthy communities forum to better understand the city and community partner health services and
without displacement. 1 Knowledge HSD
STRATEGY 2 (long-term): Develop an Innovative ETOD Infrastructure Financing Tool resources gaps.
Create a flyer to encourage the use of Proposition 400 funds for the South Central Corridor regional Write a grant to support opportunities for increased access to healthy food, such as, farmer’s market,
1 Operations ALL 2 Financing OEP
destination infrastructure improvements. community kitchen, community garden, food cooperative, etc.
Lobby for the ability to utilize Tax Increment Financing (TIF) as a tool to foster equitable transit oriented Further define displacement drivers and trends as it relates to housing violence, criminalization, environmental
2 Operations CEDD 3 Knowledge PDD
development. injustice and zoning.
Partner with the City of Phoenix through the Phoenix C.A.R.E.S program in targeted areas throughout the
4 Partnerships HSD
corridor to connect residents experiencing homelessness with services and resources
# Tools Community-Led Housing Element 5-Year Action Items City Dept.
Resource
STRATEGY 1 (short-term): Enhance the Efficiency and Quality of Existing Housing # Tools Community-Led Mobility Element 5-Year Action Items City Dept.
Resource
Pursue a Naturally Occurring Affordable Housing (NOAH) Fund to finance and purchase NOAH units at risk STRATEGY 1 (short-term): Apply Best Practice Active Transportation Standards to Future Projects
1 Operations HD
Page 440 of displacement. Engage annually with youth, residents, schools, and neighborhood associations on active transportation
Create a community-led recognition program to acknowledge community supportive housing projects in 1 Knowledge ST
2 “I PlanPHX” NSD, HD safety, education, and design decision making.
alignment with the community vision. Continue to identify and prioritize infrastructure improvements that could facilitate a well connected active
3 Partnerships Pilot an ETOD Rehabilitation fund; graduate this effort to a community land trust. NSD, HD 2 “I PlanPHX” ST
transportation network through existing programs.
STRATEGY 2 (long-term): Construct South Central ETOD Housing Demonstration Projects STRATEGY 2 (long-term): Develop and adopt new ETOD street typologies and design standards
Engage and educate property owners and neighborhood associations on the benefits of Accessory Dwelling Support and stay involved in the Active Transportation Plan efforts to ensure policy recommendations are
1 Knowledge PDD 1 “I PlanPHX” ST
Units (ADUs) and other “Missing Middle Housing” typologies. appropriate and in alignment with the South Central ETOD Community Plan and recommendations.
Research the appropriateness for the use of Community Benefit Agreements (CBA) between developers and the Engage residents on the benefits of short development blocks that enable convenient walking, biking, and
2 Knowledge CEDD 2 Knowledge PDD
broader community. transit use.
Actively support Zoning and code reform that allows for building types that provide paths to homeownership Participate in the national “Park”ing Day events by temporarily repurposing on-street parking spaces with a ST, PRD,
3 “I PlanPHX” PDD 3 Partnerships
such as ADUs, Tiny Homes, Duplexes, Triplexes, Fourplexes. pocket park. PDD
4 “I PlanPHX” Create a recognition program for developers of innovative housing demonstration projects. NSD, HD
# Tools Community-Led Mobility Element 5-Year Action Items City Dept.
Resource
# Tools Community-Led Economic Development Element 5-Year Action Items City Dept. STRATEGY 1 (short-term): Apply Best Practice Green Infrastructure, Shade, + Heat Relief Standards to Future Projects
Resource
STRATEGY 1 (short-term): Cultivate Community Economic Growth and Prosperity OEP,
1 “I PlanPHX” Apply and pursue grants for green infrastructure and heat relief assistance.
Partner with workforce development agencies to provide training opportunities, resume writing, and interview OHRM
1 Partnerships CEDD 2 Partnerships Support creation of a “clean and green team” program for South Central. CEDD
classes at community centers and schools.
2 Financing Support a grant to support business incubators. CEDD Create educational materials on the social, health, and economic benefits of shaded, safe pedestrian
3 Knowledge ALL
3 Partnerships Identify financial and resource support to expand the youth and design empowerment programs in the corridor. OAC pathways.
Encourage South Central local artists participation and application in city-wide artist talent pools, programs, Create educational materials on the importance of native species to support green infrastructure and water
4 Partnerships OAC 4 Knowledge OEP, WSD
and resources. wise communities.
STRATEGY 2 (long-term): Develop a Corridor Branding and Marketing Program STRATEGY 2 (long-term): Support Innovative Building and Clean Energy System Projects
1 Partnerships Partner and identify ways to support the expansion of existing employers in key south central industries. CEDD Support partnerships with the Audobon Center for community education and awareness on innovative
1 Partnerships PDD
Complete a “love your block” grant application for a neighborhood improvement project such as tree building and clean energy systems.
2 Partnerships NSD Explore the potential to add and expand Youth and Design Empowerment programs at parks, community and
plantings. 2 Partnerships PRD
education centers.
3 “I PlanPHX” Host a buy local event to support local small businesses and walking, biking, transit riding in the corridor. CEDD



230 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 231
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES



The Business Led Action guide is intended to compile all business led action items for ease of
BUSINESS ACTION GUIDE use and tracking. “Business” partners including banks, developers, private companies, large
corporations and small businesses.

# Tools Business-Led Land Use Element 5-Year Action Items City Dept. # Tools Business-Led Health Element 5-Year Action Items City Dept.
Resource Resource
STRATEGY 1 (short term): Apply the Walkable Urban Code (Form-Based Code) to Future Projects STRATEGY 1 (short-term): Improve Community Experiences + Access to People Oriented Spaces
Participate in a community forum to identify, recommend, and encourage the city adoption of new Identify corporate sponsorship opportunities for place making enhancements in close proximity to the NSD, OAC,
1 Partnerships PDD 1 Partnerships
development incentives to encourage development without displacement. light rail stations. CEDD
Create an evaluation score card to reveal the trade-offs of developing under the Walkable Urban Seek creative ways to promote the Rio Salado and South Mountain Park/Preserve as local and
2 Knowledge PDD 2 Partnerships PRD
Code vs. conventional zoning. regional attractions.
3 Partnerships Build a walkable urban mixed use demonstration project. PDD Identify a property that can be used as a temporary popup park/plaza and pursue funding CEDD, NSD,
3 Partnerships
STRATEGY 2 (long-term): Develop an Innovative ETOD Infrastructure Financing Tool partnerships. PDD
Hold a property and business owners workshop on Improvement Districts for financing enhanced STRATEGY 2 (long-term): Improve Community Access to Health and Food Services
1 Knowledge CEDD
infrastructure and services. Research mechanisms to support community health and food micro-businesses, such as mobile
1 Operations CEDD, PDD
Engage Anchor Institutions and large property owners on opportunities to develop mutually retailers, urban farming, and outdoor markets with regulatory relief and assistance.
2 Partnerships beneficial infrastructure, such as but not limited to district parking facilities, micro-mobility share CEDD Gather local health partners to host community health events and mobile clinics to “meet people
2 Partnerships HSD
stations, or district energy. where they are”.


# Tools Business-Led Housing Element 5-Year Action Items City Dept.
Resource City Dept.
STRATEGY 1 (short-term): Enhance the Efficiency and Quality of Existing Housing # Tools Business-Led Mobility Element 5-Year Action Items Resource
Hold/Participate in an Affordable Housing Developers forums to explore creative solutions and STRATEGY 1 (short-term): Apply Best Practice Active Transportation Standards to Future Projects
1 Partnerships HD
partnerships to provide housing for residents that fall at or below 30-50% AMI. Pursue partnerships for clusters of active transportation infrastructure enhancements connecting to
1 Partnerships ST
Page 441
Partner with nonprofit organizations and businesses to renovate or rehabilitate single family houses transit stations.
2 Partnerships NSD, HD
and/or small multifamily projects. Research the appropriateness of using Public-Private Partnerships (P3s) programs to fund south
2 Financing CEDD, ST
STRATEGY 2 (long-term): Construct South Central ETOD Housing Demonstration Projects central priorities.
1 Partnerships Develop a mixed-use, mixed-income housing project HD STRATEGY 2 (long-term): Develop and adopt new ETOD street typologies and design standards
2 Partnerships Develop a live-work and/or Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) housing demonstration project. PDD, HD Support a “shared-street”, “woonerf”, “yield street” or similar demonstration project through a
1 Partnerships ST, PDD
Partner with financial institutions to provide grants and low-interest loans to help finance local private development process.
3 Partnerships HD 2 Partnerships PDD
developers pre-development expenses. Provide on-street parking on walkable urban mixed use and walkable urban residential projects.
3 Partnerships Develop a “car-free” demonstration project in the South Central Corridor. PDD


# Tools Business-Led Economic Development Element 5-Year Action Items City Dept.
Resource
STRATEGY 1 (short-term): Cultivate Community Economic Growth and Prosperity
Hold a small business owners forum to explore the creation of a South Central local and small # Tools Business-Led Mobility Element 5-Year Action Items City Dept.
1 Knowledge CEDD Resource
business association. STRATEGY 1 (short-term): Apply Best Practice Green Infrastructure, Shade, + Heat Relief Standards to Future Projects
2 Partnerships Support an educational forum to build skills for aspiring developers. CEDD 1 Partnerships Construct innovative green infrastructure and heat relief demonstration projects. PDD
Coordinate a meeting of local and small business owners to provide knowledge and support on Hold a professional training forum on financing methods for Green Infrastructure and Low Impact
3 Knowledge CEDD 2 Knowledge WSD, OEP
business financial literacy, marketing, security, and other business improvement practices. Development (LID).
STRATEGY 2 (long-term): Develop a Corridor Branding and Marketing Program STRATEGY 2 (long-term): Support Innovative Building and Clean Energy System Projects
Hold a business forum to explore the potential to establish a Phoenix Business Improvement District in 1 Partnerships Construct innovative building and clean energy systems demonstration projects. PDD
1 Partnerships CEDD
each station area, with the districts coordinated by a Corridor Business Council. 2 Partnerships Construct innovative water capture and reuse demonstration projects. PDD
Support efforts to organize local business and community networking events through temporary
2 Partnerships CEDD
outdoor markets and pop up sales events.




232 HOW WE GET THERE HOW WE GET THERE 233
WHAT WE WANT
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE NORTH RIO SOUTH S. MTN. HOW WE GET THERE RESOURCES




ADDITIONAL RESOURCES SOUTH CENTRAL CORRIDOR CONTEXT
Existing Conditions and Best Practice “Investments” The South Central Corridor community is the newest addition to
South Central Existing Conditions Report Phoenix’s Transit Oriented Communities and is generally bound by
South Central TOD “Investment Menu”
the Union Pacific Railroad on the north, South Mountain Avenue on
Vision Summaries the south, 7th Avenue on the west, and 7th Street on the east.
North Area Results
Rio Salado Area Results
SoPho Area Results
South Mountain Area Results

Full Briefing Papers
Challenge of Equitable Transit-Oriented Development eTOD
Building Local Wealth Through eTOD
Building Affordable & Sustainable Communities Through eTOD
Public Policies to Facilitate eTOD
eTOD Strategies for Phoenix South Central Corridor Station Areas
Page 442

Summary Briefing Papers
​​​​​​Affordability & Equitable TOD​​​​​
​​​​Responsible Development Without Displacement
​​Improved Accessibility Between the Corridor​​
​​Achieving A Walkable, Healthy & Vibrant Corridor​​
​​​​Equity & Inclusion

Land Trust and Infrastructure Assessments
eTOD Infrastructure Memo
eTOD Land Use Memo

TOD Grant Team Executive Summary
South Central TOD Business Assistance + Land Use Planning Executive Summary

South Central Collaborative Recommendations
PEORIA AVE
South Central Collaborative Development Guidelines Northwest 1/4 mile radius 1/4 mile radius 1/4 mile radius
(5 minute walk) (5 minute walk) (5 minute walk)
Extension
South Central Collaborative Policy Recommendations 1/2 mile radius 1/2 mile radius 1/2 mile radius
Phase II (10 minute walk) (10 minute walk) (10 minute walk)
DUNLAP AVE
!
! Existing Light Planned-Under Planned Light
Rail Construction Rail
Light Rail
!
! Existing Station Planned Station
Planned-Under
NORTHERN AVE Construction
!
! Station


19North Transit Overlay District
(TOD-1)
GLENDALE AVE
!
! Transit Overlay District
(TOD-2)

17 Transit Oriented

BETHANY HOME RD
§
¨
¦ £
¤
51 Development (TOD)
234 HOW WE GET THERE District Boundaries HOW WE GET THERE 235
!
! Phoenix City Limits
SOUTH CENTRAL
TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITY PLAN 2022



For more information, or to view the electronic version of the document
please visit phoenix.gov/pdd/tod. This publication can be made
available in alternative format upon request. Contact the Planning and
Development Department at 602-262-7131 TTY: Use 7-1-1




Planning & Development Department
(PDD)
Page 443
Attachment C




GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS
December 30, 2021

Application: GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8

Applicant: City of Phoenix Planning Commission

Location: Area generally bounded by Union Pacific Railroad
tracks (south of Jefferson Street) on the north, 7th
Street on the east, South Mountain Avenue on the
south, and 7th Avenue on the west.

Approximate Acres: 3,270 +/-

Requested Change: To establish the South Central Transit Oriented
Development Community Plan

Reason for Requested Change: To provide a district plan to realize the shared
community vision to make South Central a world-
class destination in which current and future
residents both share in the prosperity a walkable
and transit-oriented community brings. The plan will
serve as a living document inspired by the voices of
the community to attract, guide, and prioritize
strategic investments in infrastructure, housing,
economic development, and other areas.

Village Planning Committee Dates: Central City – January 10, 2022
South Mountain – January 11, 2022

Staff Recommendation: Approval


SUMMARY

The purpose of this request is to establish the South Central Transit Oriented
Development (TOD) Community Plan. The plan is a result of a collaborative effort
between city staff and community residents, businesses and stakeholders. The plan
articulates a future vision for the area that seeks to ensure a walkable, environmentally
equitable, compact and connected community that is sustainable and resilient by




Page 444
Staff Analysis
GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8

supporting local, small businesses, sharing and preserving culture, and improving
health for all existing and future residents of the South Central corridor.

The South Central Corridor is an approximately 3,270-acre area generally bounded by
Union Pacific Railroad on the north, 7th Street on the east, South Mountain Avenue on
the south, and 7th Avenue on the west. The South Central Corridor is located at the
southernmost segment of the exiting light rail line. Building upon the previous work to
create walkable communities for all residents in Downtown, the five ReinventPHX
districts (Gateway, Eastlake-Garfield, Midtown, Uptown, Solano), and more recently the
19North District, the South Central Transit Oriented Development Community Plan will
serve as the city’s seventh TOD district policy plan.

BACKGROUND

In 2008, the largest light rail
construction project in the
nation’s history was completed
in Phoenix. This major
achievement was the result of
a partnership between local
and federal agencies, strong
civic leadership, and visionary
urban planning that began
decades earlier. The
infrastructure, however, was
designed to not just add high-
quality transportation options,
but to lay a foundation for
“reinventing” the communities Phoenix Transit Oriented Communities Map Source: City of
surrounding it by creating new Phoenix Planning and Development Department
urban living choices in a city
planned almost entirely for the automobile.

In 2011, the City of Phoenix was awarded a $2.9 million Sustainable Communities
Challenge Grant from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
Thus, a collaborative partnership and initiative between the City of Phoenix, HUD, and
numerous other organizations was born. This partnership came to be known as
“ReinventPHX” and aimed to create a new urban development model in Phoenix to
achieve walkable communities. “ReinventPHX” resulted in the creation and adoption of
a TOD Strategic Policy Framework in 2013 followed by five district policy plans in 2015
to illustrate the community vision and align it with development strategies and actions
for the communities situated along the first phase of the light rail. In 2016, the Northwest
Extension Phase I was completed and shortly after, the city began a three-year process
working with that community to develop a sixth TOD district policy plan, titled 19North,
using the ReinventPHX TOD Strategic Policy Framework as a guide. The 19North TOD
District Policy Plan was recently adopted on April 7, 2021.




Page 445
Staff Analysis
GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8


Since its adoption in 2013, the City of Phoenix TOD Strategic Policy Framework has
been utilized successfully to provide a holistic and multidisciplinary engagement,
visioning, and implementation plan framework for several diverse transit oriented
communities in the city of Phoenix. Approval of the TOD Strategic Policy Framework in
2013 established “Place Types” for the planned station areas for the South Central
Extension, thereby providing guidance on scale and intensity for the corridor.

Voters approved the South Central extension in 2000, 2004 and in 2015. In 2016, the
Phoenix City Council approved advancing the opening date from 2034 to 2023. The
advancement is funded through Transportation 2050, a 35-year, multi-modal
transportation plan approved by Phoenix voters, and the South Central
Extension/Downtown Hub is now expected to open for operations in 2024. In 2016 the
from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to engage the community and support
local businesses along the South Central Avenue planned light rail extension prior to
construction taking place.

The South Central Corridor is uniquely situated between two regional destinations,
Downtown Phoenix to the north, and South Mountain Park and Preserve to the south;
and it offers an abundance of recreational and open space opportunities due to the Rio
Salado and the Highland and Western canals that run through portions of it.

The corridor also contains segments that are within the Downtown Code, Central City
South Area Plan, Del Rio Area Brownfields Plan, Rio Montaña Area Plan, Baseline Area
Master Plan, Rio Salado Beyond the Banks Area Plan, Target Area B Redevelopment
Area, and Mountain Park Neighborhood Special District Plan. These foundational
documents provided valuable insight on the community’s desired vision, goals and
values.

Communities across the nation have focused discussions on several historic factors
such as redlining, exclusionary zoning, racist restrictive covenants, and discriminatory
lending practices that have created a health, wealth and housing gap disproportionately
impacting communities of color. The South Central Corridor communities are no
exception and have acknowledged these historic factors in their own communities.
These topics have been essential in empowering residents and community members
towards a vision that embraces more equitable outcomes, goals, and investments that
benefit existing residents first. Despite these challenges and history, South Phoenix has
proven resilient, and seeks creative, collaborative, and authentic ways towards
improving the quality of life for everyone.

The City of Phoenix in collaboration with project partners, community stakeholders, and
the Mayor and City Council-appointed South Central TOD Steering Committee
embarked on the planning process in 2018 to develop a TOD community plan for the
South Central Corridor. The product of the planning process will be the seventh TOD
Policy plan, inspired by the hearts and voices of the community, that will serve to attract,




Page 446
Staff Analysis
GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8

guide, and prioritize strategic investments in infrastructure, housing, economic
development, and other areas to realize a shared community vision for the future of the
corridor.

The TOD grant team project consultants consisted of a well-rounded group of partners
that handled a variety of tasks during the planning efforts. The grant team handled
community engagement, planning and design, provided business assistance, national
expertise on TOD research and practices, investigated and made civil and landscape
design recommendations for TOD.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

Between December 2018 and August 2019, a series of workshops were held with city
staff, the TOD grant team, and the community to understand the existing state of the
corridor, categorizing future change areas, identification of desired investments, and
refinement of the vision developed with the community’s input. Simultaneously, the
grant team engaged with the local business community as part of the business
assistance portion of the grant. The TOD grant team hosted three business assistance
workshops and conducted individual business assessments for more than 100
participating businesses. The assessments allowed a tailored approach to provide a
variety of marketing, legal, and networking assistance to help better position the
business to withstand disruptions during light rail construction. The following is a
summary of the major planning activities that contributed to and influenced the
community vision, investments, and outcomes represented in the plan:

Business Assistance Forum (December 6,
2018) – The forum brought together business
owners from the 19th Avenue corridor to share
their stories and experiences of running a
business during construction of the light rail
extension. The 19th Avenue business owners
participated in a panel discussion and then
answered questions from audience members
that included businesses and residents from
the South Central light rail corridor. The topics
covered included advice for the best ways to
thrive before, during, and after construction. South Central business owners attending
December Business Assistance Forum
Community Planning Workshop Series 1:
Shape Your Vision For The Future (March 4 and 9, 2019) – The March 4th community
planning workshop introduced the concept of transit oriented development and the six-
planning element framework. After the presentation, community members engaged in a
visioning table discussion with their peers. Community members were asked to discuss
the important places that are a part of their history in the South Central Corridor.
Community members were encouraged to write important milestones in their personal
history with the community. After the exercise, community members were invited to visit




Page 447
Staff Analysis
GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8

the various exhibits, corridor model, comment boards, and meet to record their personal
story and history. Each activity provided educational information and shared community
quotes from a variety of previous outreach efforts.

A follow-up discussion on affordability was held on March 7th at Centro Comunitario de
PAZ. A presentation was given to demonstrate the full costs of housing and
transportation and how the light rail can help increase affordability in the South Central
Corridor. The Center for Neighborhood Technology presented recent findings and
possible strategies to accommodate development without displacement. Group
discussion followed the presentation and concluded with a question and answer
session.

The March 9th closeout session reflected information
that was collected during the first workshop with
continued feedback and discussion from community
members imagining a future state of the community in
2045. The event began with a community conversation
about planning elements focused on “what is needed?”
and “where it is needed?” Community members
participated in a table exercise. Each table had a map
of a station stop area. Highlighted were nodes labeled
as transit, arterial and neighborhood zones, based on
their proximity to the proposed light rail stops.
Participants were asked to mark locations on the map
with potential land use types using pre-marked South Central residents engaging
in community workshop activity.
stickers of amenities that they would like to see within
the community. The exercise allowed for participants
to identify areas of change and associated scales. Input received contributed to various
aspects of the community vision and illustrations represented in the plan.

Both the March workshops were conducted in English and Spanish simultaneously,
capturing a variety of multi-generational, cross-cultural views on the South Central
corridor and provided a youth activity area with the prompt “Design Your Park”, which
inspired children to share new ideas through craft and various materials.

Community Planning Workshop Series 2: See Your Vision for The Future (May 6 and
11, 2019) – TOD grant team members and staff facilitated table discussions with
community members and held an interactive exercise designed to engage community
input regarding the type and location of investments and change by station area.
Community members were asked to discuss certain areas within the corridor that are at-
risk for displacement. Following this exercise, the TOD grant team and staff asked
community members to identify investment types related to the six planning elements
that should be considered throughout the various station areas within the South Central
Corridor. Each table was provided a deck of investment menu cards categorized by
planning element that the community members could look through and place on the
table representing the types of development they would like to see in that area.




Page 448
Staff Analysis
GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8


Access to Capital Business Outreach (May 9, 2019) – The workshop was aimed at
helping the small business community in South Central learn about how to access loans
at fair rates to grow their businesses. The event featured six financial entities that are
known to have loan packages in small enough increments to support the small
businesses in the corridor needing loans between $2,500 to $25,000 to buy equipment,
improve building infrastructure, or grow their inventory. The goal with this event was to
open doors into new opportunities that enable businesses to borrow at rates as low as 6
percent from institutions that know and understand small business needs, and which
are willing to customize products to create successful small loans.

The May 11th workshop provided a follow up to the community’s input and celebrated
history and heritage with a family-friendly event at South Mountain Community Center.
TOD grant team members and staff asked the community members to visit the four
station areas (Baseline, South Phoenix, Audubon, and North) marked by tables
throughout the room with the corresponding area map. Community members were also
asked to participate in a building height exercise. Illustrations of the community
concepts were presented to the public for feedback.

Business Assistance Marketing Workshop (October 1, 2019) – Local businesses in the
South Central corridor reported in interviews with the business assistance team having
marketing assistance needs. These businesses reported they did not have funds for
advertising and would like low-cost or no-cost methods to reach new potential
customers. The event featured two marketing experts that shared invaluable insight and
strategy on how the business owner can optimize their marketing and social media
presence.

TOD Grant Team Final Presentations (November 4, and 5, 2019) –
The TOD grant team unveiled Illustrative Master Plans at two public meetings that were
held in English and Spanish. The community was able to see their input and what they
selected as areas of prioritized investments through visually engaging maps showing
incremental growth and highlighting areas of future development.

Village Planning Committee Informational Sessions – An overview of the plan was
presented as an informational item at the October 2019 and March 2021 Central City
and September 2019 and March 2021 South Mountain Village Planning Committee
meetings.

Planning Commission Informational Sessions (August 2020 and January 2021) – An
overview of the plan was presented as an informational item to the Planning
Commission.

Additional targeted engagement was conducted in March of 2021 as directed by the
South Central TOD Steering Committee for local developers and those in the
community most at risk for displacement in workshops that were hosted by local
community partners, including the South Central Collaborative. As a result, more than




Page 449
Staff Analysis
GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8

40 local developers provided feedback on code, process, and financial barriers to
implementing affordable TOD style development. A local partner shared preliminary
results of an ongoing literature review and information on different factors of
displacement. Both efforts contributed to additional action items to continue working
with local partners on health equity.

The South Central Collaborative –
The Collaborative consists of more than 40
public, private, nonprofit, philanthropic
leaders, and community members.
Throughout the planning efforts their group
has hosted several partnering meetings,
operated four sub-groups, provided
recommendation documents on light rail
design, presented development guideline
recommendations to the South Central The South Central Collaborative was a pivotal
TOD Steering Committee, and continues to partner in the South Central TOD planning efforts.
build capacity between the local
community.

South Central TOD Steering Committee – The Mayor and Council appointed Steering
Committee was essential in crafting of the plan and to ensuring it captured the essence
that the community voiced. The fourteen (14) member steering committee represented
a variety of South Central stakeholders and neighborhoods. They advocated for an
equitable outreach and engagement process, for rejecting displacement of existing
residents, food and housing security, local small businesses, and infrastructure
investments amongst their extensive list of items to champion for the South Central
community. The Steering Committee’s ongoing engagement, with more than 20
meetings open to the public, refined and prioritized several strategies and actions to
respond to the needs of the Corridor. The Committee also assisted in identifying
partnerships that could potentially provide implementation resources, and they continue
to advocate for residents of the South Central Corridor. On May 19th, 2021, the South
Central TOD Steering Committee unanimously approved the draft plan and
recommended to proceed through the public review and approval process with the
name change to South Central TOD Community Plan instead of South Central
Equitable TOD Community Plan. The name change was the result of a committee
discussion in which they stated that equity is not just a given, and that it will require
action, hard work, follow through and accountability to become an equitable plan.

PLAN STRUCTURE

Employing the six planning element framework established within the ReinventPHX
TOD Strategic Policy Framework, the South Central TOD planning effort successfully
provided a holistic and multidisciplinary engagement, visioning, and implementation
effort. The framework consists of six intrinsically interconnected planning elements
(Land Use, Housing, Economic Development, Mobility, Health, Green Systems) to




Page 450
Staff Analysis
GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8

ensure a multidisciplinary process. The framework, combined with active engagement
of the community, and created a plan that is responsive to the specific needs and
desires of the South Central community. The South Central Transit Oriented
Development Community Plan is comprised of an introduction and three substantive
sections – Who We Are Today, What We Want, and How We Get There.

The four distinct areas of the corridor, each uniquely focused on the people’s
history, character, uses, and aspirations to blend all future community identified
investments and enhancements in an equitable and appropriate way are
identified as North of the Interstate 17 Freeway (I-17), at the Rio Salado, South
of the Rio Salado and most adjacent to South Mountain.

The introduction section provides a brief history of the planning corridor and
details existing adopted policy and efforts that influenced the plan.

The Who We Are Today (Current State Assessment, Pages 22-94) section
provides a background on the corridor obtained from local resident expertise
and their shared experiences along with technical data. As part of the initial
planning process, an existing conditions report was created for the South
Central Corridor project. The existing conditions report provides an in-depth
current state analysis, background, and demographic overview utilizing the six-
planning element framework: land use, housing, economic development, health,
mobility, and green systems. After the six planning element assessments were
completed the project team compiled several “Best Practice Community
Investment Cards” such as safe bike lanes, safe crosswalks, community
gardens, and trees and shade, similarly organized into the six planning
elements. This “investment menu” became a foundation for facilitating
interactive conversations, education, listening, and learning with the community.
An overview of community-identified assets known as “points of pride” within the
South Central corridor is also included in this section.

The What We Want (Vision for The Future, Pages 98-154)) section outlines the
vision of the community to 2045. As described in the public participation
Four Distinct Sub Areas Map,
section above, residents and other Corridor stakeholders participated in Source: South Central TOD
surveys, bilingual workshops, and field surveys designed to identify and Community Plan
map assets, community needs, and improvement opportunities. Based
on input received during the public workshops, and with guidance from the South
Central TOD Steering Committee members, a corridor-wide vision statement to support
equitable TOD & reject displacement was developed, alongside vision statements and
illustrative renderings for the four distinct sub areas in the corridor.

The What We Want section also contains a community-identified “protect, enhance,
invest” maps, intended to help guide future development within the planning area. Along
with the adopted place types established in the TOD Strategic Policy Framework, these
maps will help city staff and the community evaluate future rezoning requests within the
four distinct areas of the corridor. The maps depict growth areas as follows:




Page 451
Staff Analysis
GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8


• Protect areas are designated for slow incremental growth strategies, smaller
scale and lowest intensity investments. Housing investments examples:
accessory dwelling units, tiny homes, manufactured homes, duplexes, triplexes,
and fourplexes.

• Enhance areas are designated for slow to moderate rate of growth strategies,
medium scale and medium intensity investments. Housing investments
examples: courtyard apartments, townhouses, medium multiplexes, and live-
work units.

• Invest areas designated for moderate rate of growth strategies, medium/large
scale and medium/high intensity investments. Housing investments examples:
Mid-rise apartments or condominiums, mixed use residential.

The How We Get There (Implementation, Pages 170-232) section lists measurable
outcomes designed to demonstrate success toward achieving the vision organized by
the six planning elements. Top strategies and polices that were identified through
community input, including prioritized investments and locations from the visioning
process, are presented along with a five-year action plan that articulates a series of
activities, partnerships, and steps toward achieving the vision both through short, and
ongoing implementation items.

One of the top land use-related strategies is to apply the Walkable Urban Code to future
development. Form-Based Codes, such as the Walkable Urban Code, are known to
connect the complex physical environment to standards that can be adjusted for each
individual context, or character area, while providing the restorative potential of time-
tested pedestrian oriented forms of urbanism.

The South Central TOD Community Plan presents initial residential and commercial
neighborhood characteristics that set the foundation for an in-depth Character Area
assessment. The assessment, combined with the Protect, Enhance, Invest, maps will
provide an extra layer of guidance on zoning and entitlement requests within the South
Central Corridor to uphold the South Central Corridors’ community-based vision to
“Reject Displacement “and “Support Equitable TOD”.

HOW THE PLAN WILL BE USED

The South Central TOD Community Plan represents a vision for the planning area that
will be used by a variety of stakeholders. The plan embodies a community-supported
vision for the corridor which will aid in supporting investment and reinvestment that is
consistent with the goals and priorities outlined by the community. Similarly, city staff
will utilize the plan as a policy guide for redevelopment projects seeking rezoning
approval. Additionally, the implementation section of the plan identifies priority actions
and investments that will provide valuable information that can help inform future
decisions made by residents, business owners and government entities for things such



Page 452
Staff Analysis
GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8

as infrastructure, services, and other community growth and development opportunities.

Inspired by the hearts and voices of the community, the plan has been called a “living
document” referring to its ability to adapt to future conditions with periodic assessments
as the six planning element framework evolves to the community’s needs. The plan also
serves as a “call to action” for stakeholders and partners by providing an outline of
implementation items organized by various government, community and business led
partners to achieve the community vision.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends approval of GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8 as the South Central Transit
Oriented Development (TOD) Community Plan will help guide land use and investment
decisions within the South Central corridor.

Writer
Elias Valencia
December 30, 2021

Exhibits
Exhibit A: South Central Transit Oriented Development Community Plan




Page 453
Attachment D




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8
INFORMATION ONLY


Date of VPC Meeting November 8, 2021
General Plan Amendment to create the South Central
Request From
TOD Community Plan
Area generally bounded by Union Pacific Rail Road on
Location the North, 7th Street on the east, 7th Avenue on the
west, South Mountain Avenue on the south


VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

Seven members of the public requested to speak on this item, in favor.

Elias Valencia, staff, thanked the Steering Committee and community members for
their expertise in creating the plan, reviewed the plan boundaries, the name change of
the plan, and the elements of the plan. Mr. Valencia added that the education
campaign, conducted in both English and Spanish, met people where they were and
provided valuable public input, and that the vision to reject displacement was heard
loud and clear. Mr. Valencia the reviewed the four sub-areas, the protect, enhance, and
invest designations on the sub-area maps, and the measurable outcomes. Mr. Valencia
thanked the Steering Committee, the South Central Collaborative and concluded with a
tentative hearing schedule.

Questions from the Committee:
Ryan Boyd asked if the elements for pedestrian safety were crafted from community
activists or if it came from developers. Mr. Valencia replied that those guidelines came
from the South Central Collaborative and from their Local Developers Convening,
which brought together about 30 local developers who were asked to share about what
challenges they face and what will help make a walkable transit-oriented project easier
to build. Mr. Valencia added that there was a lot of collaboration with the South Central
Collaborative.

Eva Olivas thanked staff and the Steering Committee members for their hard work on
the planning process.

Public Comment:



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882

Page 454
Central City Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8
Page 2


Pastor Jeffrey Walker shared that this plan is the voice of the community, and that
many residents live below 30% of the AMI and are renters, there is a fear of
displacement and an effort to preserve neighborhoods and implement a mix of housing
types, and the sense of community is prevalent in the plan as is the need to switch
from reliance on automobiles.

Petra Falcon shared that she has lived in the community for most of her adult life and
the plan was created with the support of the community and shared gratitude for the
work that was done to create the plan.

Tom Kelly shared that he was impressed by the efforts that were made to produce the
plan and shared that the issues faced by the community are to prevent displacement
and activate the area to create a cultural corridor.

Sam Gomez thanked everyone for their efforts on the plan and that he worked with the
Street Transportation Department on how to improve the Rio Salado, which should be
activated. Mr. Gomez added that the South Central Corridor will also be a new
destination for arts and culture.

Brian Cassidy shared that the catalyst for the plan began when the light rail was
primarily being proposed to extend along Central, and that since that time many people
have been working together who he wouldn’t have known if not for the proposal to
extend the light rail.

Shannon Scutari shared that she helped facilitate the South Central Collaborative,
which is a group that focuses on public-private partnerships, and that this is just the
beginning of change for the area that will impact generations to come.

Victor Vidales thanked Eva Olivas for being the Steering Committee Chair, and
shared that the draft plan was approved by the South Central TOD Steering
Committee, the plan was crafted with a lot of community input and that displacement is
a key issues when most of the community are renters who rely on public transit and live
on less than $20,000 a year.

Response to Public Comment:
Elias Valencia, staff, reiterated that they will be back soon for a recommendation and
that their priority will be to finish the Spanish translation of the plan prior to moving on
for recommendation.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 455
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8
INFORMATION ONLY

Date of VPC Meeting November 9, 2021

Request General Plan Amendment to create the South Central
TOD Community Plan
Location Area generally bounded by Union Pacific Rail Road on the
North, 7th Street on the east, 7th Avenue on the west,
South Mountain Avenue on the south

VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

Eight members of the public registered to speak in support of this item.

Elias Valencia, with the Planning and Development Department, introduced
himself and provided an overview of the South Central Transit Oriented
Development (SCTOD) policy plan that is currently in draft. He provided a
summary of the plan, noting past and current efforts. He discussed the role of the
SCTOD steering committee and the timeline for the project. The plan is broken
down into four main sections, and he discussed the framework of the plan. Public
engagement efforts were noted, including visioning sessions to help reject
displacement. He discussed the four areas noted in the plan, discussing land use
priorities and describing measures to protect, enhance and invest. He described
residential character areas, measurable outcomes, implementation strategies
and actions. He concluded the presentation by providing a timeline of the plan.

Fatima Said asked if changes to the plan could be made. Mr. Valencia stated
that recommendations can be made as the plan comes back for recommendation
to the committee potentially next month. The draft plan will be posted online as
well for the public to review.

Chairwoman Daniels asked for public comments to be provided on this item.

Pastor Jeffrey Walker, member of the public, introduced himself and supports
this plan. The plan will benefit and protect people in the corridor. He discussed
the adoption and implementation of the plan and added that the plan will help to
preserve the history unique to South Phoenix.

Victor Vidales, a small business owner and member of SoPho Convening,
introduced himself and supports this plan. Over 7,000 people have been spoken




Page 456
to and the plan will help create a prosperous community. He asked for the plan to
be adopted and hopes that it will be implemented.

Krista Shepard introduced herself and indicated that her firm has provided
technical support to the project. She hopes it will improve the qualify of life,
infrastructure, amenities, walkability, and urges the committee to approve this
plan in December. She asked for the vision of the plan to be upheld and looks
forward to the plan moving forward.

Tom Kelly, member of the public, stated that this is an extraordinary plan that
protects neighborhoods. He discussed the benefits of the Walkable Urban code
and combating the heat island effect. He discussed the investments needed to
make larger improvements, bikeway connections, and the underutilized asset of
the Salt River.

Shannon Scutari, consultant on the project, introduced herself and stated that
this group has incorporated the voices of the community and the South Central
Collaborative will now celebrate 5 years. This plan embraces community input
and has been the most engaging plan that she has worked on to date.

Samuel Gomez, member of the public, stated that this plan reflects the work,
commitment and passion of people for over 5 years. It is important to make this a
healing project symbolic of dignity. He would like to see this plan approved as
there is too much energy and love invested in it.

Petra Falcon and Brian Cassidy registered but were not available to speak.

Marcia Busching asked where the draft plan can be located on the website. Mr.
Valencia stated that the plan will be posted on the website and the committee
will have time to review this plan ahead of the next meeting.

Gene Holmerud asked for information regarding a bike path along 3rd Avenue.
Mr. Valencia stated that this project is being led by the Street Transportation
Department.

Vice Chair Marchuk stated that this is a non-regulatory plan in nature and asked
how the plan will be enforced. Mr. Valencia discussed the WU code as a
potential incentive that requires rezoning of the property, and we must all work
together to achieve the vision of the plan long-term.

Chairwoman Daniels stated that the Cul-de-Sac project in the City of Tempe
would be a good fit in this corridor. There are two properties designated for
hospitals that should be kept on the map to encourage these uses there. The
hospital on Buckeye Road is no longer a viable location.

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
None.




Page 457
Attachment E




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8


Date of VPC Meeting January 10, 2022
To establish the South Central Transit Oriented
Request
Development Community Plan.
Area generally bounded by Union Pacific Railroad
tracks (south of Jefferson Street) on the north, 7th
Location
Street on the east, South Mountain Avenue on the
south, and 7th Avenue on the west.
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation.
VPC Vote 13-0


VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

There were four requests to speak on this item, in support. Committee members
Rachel Frazier Johnson and Darlene Martinez joined during this item, bringing quorum
to 13.

Joel Carrasco, staff, introduced the item and showed a map of the light rail extension.
Elias Valencia, staff, shared that this plan is the amalgamation of over three years of
public participation, it is not regulatory, nor does it rezone any property outright, and the
elements of the plan. Mr. Valencia added that the public participation was robust, done
in English and Spanish, and shared that the Steering Committee, appointed by the
Mayor and City Council, championed the community’s need to protect existing
residents, and that the vision for the plan is to reject displacement. Mr. Valencia
showed the four subareas denoted as areas to protect, enhance, and invest, and
shared that the plan has an image of the potential buildout for each station area and
that the plan has implementation strategies for the short-term and the long-term. Mr.
Valencia ended by sharing the proposed hearing schedule.

Questions from the Committee:
Eva Olivas shared that she served as the Steering Committee Chair, the experience
was challenging and rewarding, they really listened to the community needs, that
community engagement was critical, flexibility was also important and thanked City
staff for all their help. Mr. Valencia responded that it was an honor to work with Ms.
Olivas who is a great champion of the community, and that they took a comprehensive



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882

Page 458
Central City Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8
Page 2


approach to engagement and shared an example of a developers convening to hear
challenges that local developers face.

Chris Colyer echoed the sentiments of Ms. Olivas, shared that he also served on the
Steering Committee and that Ms. Olivas did a wonderful job as Chair, and thanked staff
for their efforts.

Vice Chair Ryan Boyd asked if duplexes, triplexes or mobile home parks are
permitted in R1-6 zoned parcels, since many of the “protect” areas are zoned that, and
what are the tools that can be used to increase density in those areas. Mr. Valencia
replied that the Walkable Urban Code I a great tool to have a mix of housing types, and
some areas have underlying multifamily zoning but are built out as single-family
residential neighborhoods, and that the areas can be revisited and that the plan is a
living document.

Public Comment:
Francisca Montoya thanked city staff for their efforts, shared that Central City South
was previously viewed as an underserved area, but it is a beautiful community and that
the plan is just the beginning for the area and will serve as a design guide for future
development.

Krista Shepard shared that she is a resident of the area, is part of the South Central
Collaborative and Phoenix Community Alliance, and that this plan will improve the
quality of life and for current and future generations in the area, implementing zoning to
reduce displacement is key, and that their analysis confirms the urgency of the plan
and the need to reduce displacement.

Victor Vidales shared that he is a small business owner, a member of the SoPho
Convening, that this plan is long overdue and that equitable TOD enables people to
stay in their community, that two thirds of the residents in the area are renters, with an
annual income of less that $20,000 and a family spends 60% of their income on
housing and transportation costs.

Shannon Scutari shared that this plan is a culmination of several years of work, it is
the voice of the community, it is just the beginning for the area and that the community
is key in implementing the plan.

Response to Public Comment:
Mr. Valencia thanked the community members for their support and kind words.

Motion:
Eva Olivas motioned to recommend approval per the staff recommendation. Ash Uss
seconded the motion.

Discussion:

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 459
Central City Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8
Page 3


Vice Chair Ryan Boyd shared that while he likes the plan, there is a concern that the
Zoning Code does not allow people to do what the plan wants, unless people
voluntarily rezone their property, and that the plan calls for multimodal pathways but
some of the streets have suicide lanes, and if the concern is about displacement, there
are less tools to reject displacement, citing an example of a Historic Preservation
overlay being used to protect areas but there are no other tools like that to protect
areas. Vice Chair Boyd concluded that it is a wonderful plan, but we need to create
zoning tools to implement it.

Chair Nate Sonoskey echoed Vice Chair Boyd’s comments and shared that this
should be an item the committee tracks over the course of the year.

Janey Pearl Starks shared that Mountain Park Health Center where she works, is part
of the plan area and asked if Ms. Olivas would like to make a motion on the item.

Vote
13-0, Motion to approve passed, with Committee Members, Burns, Colyer, Gaona,
Gonzalez, R. Johnson, Lockhart, Martinez, Olivas, Panetta, Starks, Uss, Boyd and
Sonoskey in favor.



STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 460
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8

Date of VPC Meeting January 11, 2022

Request General Plan Amendment to create the South Central
TOD Community Plan
Location Area generally bounded by Union Pacific Rail Road on the
North, 7th Street on the east, 7th Avenue on the west,
South Mountain Avenue on the south

Recommendation Approval

Vote 15-0; Members Aldama, Alvarez, Brownell, Busching,
Coleman, Greathouse, Hare, Holmerud, Ray, Said,
Shepard, Smith, Viera, Marchuk and Daniels in favor;
None in dissent.

VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

Eight members of the public registered to speak in support of this item.

Elias Valencia, with the Planning and Development Department, introduced
himself and provided an overview of the South Central Transit Oriented
Development (SCTOD) policy plan draft which has been finalized. He provided a
summary of the plan, noting past and current efforts. He discussed the role of the
SCTOD steering committee. The plan has four main sections, and he discussed
the framework of the plan. Public engagement efforts were noted, including
visioning sessions to help reject displacement. He discussed the four areas
noted in the plan, discussing land use priorities and describing measures to
protect, enhance and invest. He described residential plus mixed-use character
areas, measurable outcomes, implementation strategies and actions. He
concluded the presentation by providing a timeline on the plan adoption and
asked for approval of this policy document.

Greg Brownell stated that a builder does not need to adhere to this plan and
discussed the existing General Plan.

Mr. Valencia explained that this would be a guiding policy document and
discussed the existing General Plan.




Page 461
Vice Chair Marchuk discussed the densification along the SCTOD corridor and
asked whether densification in other areas outside of the SCTOD corridor would
still be encouraged.

Mr. Valencia stated that context is important for any case and stated that this
plan helps outline where certain land uses should go.

Fatima Said would like for more discussion on displacement. She provided
examples of trespassing on transportation platforms. She asked if there could be
free light rail passes given out to people and asked how this effort relates to
Valley Metro and displacement.

Mr. Valencia discussed both short-term and long-term goals, adding that
development should be sensitive to context and scale. He discussed some
elements that were shared with Valley Metro.

Lee Coleman thanked Mr. Valencia for his efforts. He stated that there are other
types of shade that are not only vegetative.

Mr. Valencia looks forward to partner with the Office of Heat Response and
Mitigation. He added that structural shade is also important.

Chairwoman Daniels asked for additional questions from the committee. She
then opened the floor for public comments on this case.

Francisca Montoya introduced herself and stated that this is the first
undertaking of its kind and discussed the disinvestment in the area. This is a
beautiful community and congratulated the members for their aspirations. This
should be a guide and understands that this vision will take time to develop.

Petra Falcon echo’s Ms. Montoya’s comments that this plan is a guide for
developers to stop displacement and gentrification. She has lived here for over
45 years and has family who now lives in the area. She wants the future
generations to see this and there needs to be a commitment to accomplish this
vision. The work needs to continue.

Gabriel Jaramillo supports the work and vision for the area to avoid
gentrification and address the needs of the community.

Victor Vidales urges support for the plan. He discussed the benefits of the plan
and all the hard work for this. Equitable TOD was discussed, and the studies
conducted along this corridor. Most families here live on $20,000 per year and
most is spent on transit and housing costs. He discussed his roots in this
community.




Page 462
Armando Ruiz supports this plan. He gave his input as a SCTOD Steering
Committee member and stated that the plan is not perfect, but it serves as a
guide. The destiny of the corridor is in all of our hands.

Shannon Scutari stated that this plan is the voice of the people and all need to
be held accountable, including city officials, to implement this plan.
Samuel Gomez and Krista Shepard registered to speak but were not available
during the meeting.

Chairwoman Daniels asked for further discussion or a motion on the item.

Mr. Brownell is not happy with the operation of the SCTOD Steering Committee
but is happy with the Plan set forth by the city. This committee needs to vote per
the plan and all need to be strong even when voting against a proposal.

Vice Chair Marchuk stated that this should reinforce the need to adhere to the
General Plan Land Use Map designation in areas outside of the SCTOD corridor.

MOTION:

Mr. Coleman motioned to approve case GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8 per the staff
recommendation. Mr. Holmerud seconded the motion.

VOTE:

15-0; Members Aldama, Alvarez, Brownell, Busching, Coleman, Greathouse,
Hare, Holmerud, Ray, Said, Shepard, Smith, Viera, Marchuk and Daniels in
favor; None in dissent.


STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
None.




Page 463
Attachment F




ADDENDUM A
GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8
STAFF ANALYSIS
February 1, 2022

Application: GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8

Applicant: City of Phoenix Planning Commission

Location: Area generally bounded by Union Pacific Railroad
tracks (south of Jefferson Street) on the north, 7th
Street on the east, South Mountain Avenue on the
south, and 7th Avenue on the west.

Approximate Acres: 3,270 +/-

Requested Change: To establish the South Central Transit Oriented
Development Community Plan

Reason for Requested Change: To provide a district plan to realize the shared
community vision to make South Central a world-
class destination in which current and future
residents both share in the prosperity a walkable
and transit-oriented community brings. The plan will
serve as a living document inspired by the voices of
the community to attract, guide, and prioritize
strategic investments in infrastructure, housing,
economic development, and other areas.

Village Planning Committee Dates: Central City – January 10, 2022
South Mountain – January 11, 2022

Staff Recommendation: Approval


SUMMARY
The Central City Village Planning Committee heard this General Plan Amendment
request on January 10, 2022, and the South Mountain Village Planning Committee on
January 11, 2022. The VPC’s unanimously approved the GPA by a vote of 13-0 and
15-0 respectively. A few minor administrative changes have been made to the South
Central TOD Community Plan since thosePage VPC
hearings were held to provide
Addendum A to the Staff Analysis GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8
February 1, 2022

additional clarity. Most noticeable is the addition of the following statement on all the
station area axonometric illustrations:

“The purpose of this Illustrative rendering is not to show development exactly as it will
occur, but to provide visual guidance on community identified “priority sites” as it
relates to the overall community vision, and to demonstrate a range of development
scales and intensity respectful of existing neighborhoods, parcels and block
configurations, and to be consistent with adopted station area “Place Types” to provide
additional guidance for the application of the Walkable Urban form based code, where
appropriate.”

An additional statement and graphic delineation of the existing Downtown Code (DTC)
character area boundaries was added to the North area axonometric illustration. The
statement reads as follows:

“Properties located in the Downtown Code may not depict the full development
entitlements/potential currently allowed under the provision as regulated by the
Downtown Code.”

These specific changes can be seen in the document on the following pages:

• Pages 117, 118, 133, 135, 149, 150, 153, 166: The first note which clarifies the
intent of the axonometric illustrations.

• Page 117: The second note clarifying that properties may not be depicted with
full development entitlement/potential as currently allowed under the Downtown
Code.

In addition, there were minor updates to the North area illustrative maps/graphics to
accommodate a property owner request for more accurate visual representation of
future development of their property on pages 107, 109, 111, 113, 115, and 117.

Lastly, a few typographical corrections were made on the front and rear cover pages
and throughout the acknowledgement sections. Of note is a statement that was added
to honor one of our TOD team members that we recently lost. Her bright and positive
outlook and dedication to the South Central community contributed greatly to the
planning efforts. She will be dearly missed.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval reflecting updates to the community plan, provided above.

Writer
Elias Valencia
February 1, 2022

Exhibits
Exhibit A: South Central Transit Oriented Development Community Plan

Page 465
Attachment G


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
February 3, 2022

ITEM NO: 8
DISTRICT NO.: 7 and 8
SUBJECT:

Application #: GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8
Request: Area Plan
Location: Area generally bounded by Union Pacific Railroad tracks (south of
Jefferson Street) on the north, 7th Street on the east, South Mountain
Avenue on the south, and 7th Avenue on the west.
Acreage: 3,270
Proposal: General Plan Amendment to create the South Central Transit Oriented
Development Community Plan.
Applicant: City of Phoenix, Planning Commission
Representative: City of Phoenix, Planning Commission

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Central City 11/8/2021 Information only.
South Mountain 11/9/2021 Information only.
Central City 1/10/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 13-0.
South Mountain 1/11/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 15-0.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approved, per the Addendum A Staff Report.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Commissioner Johnson made a MOTION to approve GPA-SM-CC-1-21-7-8, per
the Addendum A Staff Report.

Maker: Johnson
Second: Gaynor
Vote: 8-0
Absent: None
Opposition Present: No

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.






Page 466



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing and Resolution Adoption - General Plan Amendment GPA-SM-3-
21-8 - Southwest Corner of 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue (Resolution
22001)

Request to hold a public hearing on a General Plan Amendment for the following item
to consider adopting the Planning Commission's recommendation and the related
Resolution if approved. This item is a companion case to Z-58-21-8 and must be heard
first, followed by Z-58-21-8.

Summary
Current Plan Designation: Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre
Proposed Plan Designation: Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre
Acreage: 20.76 acres
Reason for Change: Minor General Plan amendment to allow single-family residential
up to 3.5 dwelling units per acre

Owner: PW Again, LLC
Applicant: Paul Gilbert, Beus Gilbert McGroder, PLLC
Representative: Paul Gilbert, Beus Gilbert McGroder, PLLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval.
VPC Action: The South Mountain Village Planning Committee heard the case on Dec.
14, 2021, and continued the case, by a vote of 11-0. The South Mountain Village
Planning Committee heard the case again on Jan. 11, 2022, and recommended denial,
by a vote of 10-4-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard the case on Jan. 6, 2022, and continued
the case, by a vote of 8-0. The Planning Commission heard the case again on Feb. 3,
2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 6-2.

Location
Southwest corner of 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue.
Council District: 8
Parcel Addresses: 8410, 8420 S. 19th Ave.; and 2075 W. South Mountain Ave.




Page 467

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 468
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION



RESOLUTION


A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2015
GENERAL PLAN FOR PHOENIX, APPLICATION GPA-SM-3-21-8,
CHANGING THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FOR THE
PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The 2015 Phoenix General Plan, which was adopted by

Resolution 21307, is hereby amended by adopting GPA-SM-3-21-8. The 20.76 acres

located at the southwest corner of 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue is

designated as Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre.

SECTON 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the 2015 Phoenix General Plan to reflect this land use classification change as

shown below:




Page 469
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 2nd day of March

2022.



MAYOR




ATTEST:


____________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk




-2- Resolution

Page 470
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney



By:___________________________
___________________________



REVIEWED BY:


______________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




PL:tml:LF22-3300:2-20-22:2231057v1




-3- Resolution



Page 471
Attachment B




GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS
December 9, 2021

Application: GPA-SM-3-21-8

Owner: PW Again, LLC

Applicant: Paul Gilbert, Beus Gilbert McGroder, PLLC

Representative: Paul Gilbert, Beus Gilbert McGroder, PLLC

Location: Southwest corner of 19th Avenue and South
Mountain Avenue

Acreage: 20.76 acres

Current Plan Designation: Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre


Requested Plan Designation: Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre

Reason for Requested Change: A minor General Plan Map Amendment to allow
single-family residential up to 3.5 dwelling units per
acre

South Mountain Village Planning
Committee Date: December 14, 2021

Staff Recommendation: Approval

FINDINGS:

1) The subject site exceeds 10 acres, which requires a minor General Plan
Amendment to the Land Use Map.

2) The proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation of Residential 2 to 3.5
dwelling units per acre is compatible with surrounding land uses.




Page 472
Staff Analysis
GPA-SM-3-21-8
Page 2


3) The proposed land use designation is appropriate at the intersection of an arterial
and minor collector street.

4) The companion Rezoning Case Z-58-21-8 includes standards that ensure
consistency in scale and character as well as appropriate transitions for adjacent
single-family zoned property.

BACKGROUND

The subject site is located at the southwest corner of 19th Avenue and South Mountain
Avenue and is presently vacant. The companion Rezoning Case Z-58-21-8 is
requesting to rezone the subject site from 20.76 acres of S-1 (Ranch or Farm
Residence District), approved R1-18 (Single-Family Residence District) to 20.76 acres
of R1-10 (Single-Family Residence District) to allow a new 67-lot single-family detached
community. The development, as proposed by the applicant, would allow a density up to
3.23 dwelling units per gross acre. The subject site is located adjacent to an arterial
street (19th Avenue) which connects to Baseline Road, approximately 0.5 miles to the
north, and Dobbins Road which is approximately 0.40 miles to the south.

SURROUNDING LAND USES

The proposed General Plan Land Use Map amendment is located in the southwest
portion of the South Mountain Village. The General Plan Land Use Map designation
surrounding the site is Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre. An active General Plan
Land Use Map amendment request for Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre has
been filed for a property at the southeast corner of 19th Avenue and South Mountain
Avenue.

Approximately 0.1 miles north of the site and further along Baseline Road are properties
designated Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre. Furthermore, approximately 0.3
miles to the northwest and southeast of the site are properties designated Residential
10 to 15 dwelling units per acre.




Page 473
Staff Analysis
GPA-SM-3-21-8
Page 3




Proposed General Plan Land Use Map, Source: City of Phoenix

RIO MONTAÑA AREA PLAN

In 2000, the City of Phoenix adopted the Rio Montaña Area Plan which encourages the
preservation of the rural character of the area and incorporates transition zones to
protect desert and open space areas. The plan also encourages pedestrian and
equestrian activities through a network of trails and aspires to develop a sense of
community while encouraging investment in the community.

The Rio Montaña Area Plan intends to accomplish this vision through seven goals that
pertain to: promoting high quality development, protecting and improving
neighborhoods, keeping a distinctive character, protecting the rural character, promoting
business development, developing a tourist industry, providing a variety of
transportation options.

The Rio Montaña Proposed Land Use Plan map designated the subject site as
Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre, while the proposal is to allow Residential 2 to
3.5 dwelling units per acre. As stipulated in Rezoning Case Z-58-21-8, the development
will incorporate lots ranging from 60 feet to 70 feet along perimeter of the site, provide a
larger open space area along the perimeter than required by the Zoning Ordinance,
require pitched roofs to be incorporated in all buildings, incorporate one-story limitations
along perimeter lots and enhanced perimeter landscaping. These elements will help
provide an appropriate land use transition consistent with development patterns in the
area, while furthering many of the goals of the Rio Montaña Area Plan.




Page 474
Staff Analysis
GPA-SM-3-21-8
Page 4


RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN CORE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES

CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES
• OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels
of increased intensity, respectful of local conditions and surrounding
neighborhoods.

The proposal for a single-family detached residential community would allow
development of a housing product that is consistent with other single-family uses
in the general area. As stipulated in Rezoning Case Z-58-21-8, the development
will incorporate a range of perimeter lot widths, enhanced landscaping, height
restrictions, and wider open space areas than required by the Zoning Ordinance
which will also help to provide a transition from the proposed development to
adjacent large-lot residential and rural properties.

• OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Promote and encourage
compatible development and redevelopment with a mix of housing types in
neighborhoods close to employment centers, commercial areas, and where
transit or transportation alternatives exist.

The proposal for a single-family detached residential community, would allow
development of a housing product that is consistent with other single-family uses
in the general area. An access point to the site is provided along 19th Avenue, an
arterial street, which connects to Baseline Road where transit service is present.

CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS
• CLEAN NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Facilitate the
acquisition of vacant, underutilized and blighted parcels for appropriate
redevelopment, compatible with the adjacent neighborhood character and
adopted area plans.

The proposal will facilitate development of this vacant lot in a manner that will be
compatible in the area, as stipulated in Rezoning Case Z-58-21-8, design and
appearance of the development will be promoted through several stipulations
that require enhanced landscaping, pitched roofed buildings, and durable
materials in building elevations. Many of these elements will further the intent of
the Rio Montaña Area Plan.

• DIVERSE NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Include a mix of
housing types and densities where appropriate within each village that
support a broad range of lifestyles.

Approval of the request will allow the introduction of a single-family detached
community in an area where various residential densities exist. A range of zoning
districts exist in the area which include S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence District),



Page 475
Staff Analysis
GPA-SM-3-21-8
Page 5


R1-18 (Single-Family Residence District) and R1-10 (Single-Family Residential
District). This proposed development will help to provide housing for a broader
range of lifestyles in the area.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends approval of GPA-SM-3-21-8. The proposed land use map
designation of 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre is consistent in scale and character with
existing land uses in the surrounding area. The land use map designation, as
requested, would further diversify the land uses in this part of the South Mountain
Village in a manner consistent with development patterns based on the existing zoning
and General Plan Land Use Map designations in the general area. Furthermore, the
requested land use map designation provides a transition between adjacent large lot
residential and rural uses, and 19th Avenue, an arterial street.

As stipulated, the concurrent case Z-58-21-8 will enhance the compatibility and
consistency with the land use pattern in the surrounding area while furthering many of
the goals from the Rio Montaña Area Plan. Approval of the request, with concurrent
case Z-58-21-8, will support the development of this underutilized property with uses
that are compatible with the land use designations and zoning districts in the general
area.

Writer
Enrique Bojórquez Gaxiola
December 9, 2021

Team Leader
Samantha Keating

Exhibits
Sketch Maps (2 pages)




Page 476
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 200 W WASHINGTON ST PHOENIX, AZ 85003 (602) 262-6882

APPLICATION NO: GPA-SM-3-21-8 ACRES: 20.76 +/-
VILLAGE: South Mountain COUNCIL DISTRICT: 8
APPLICANT: Paul Gilbert / Cassandra Ayres
EXISTING:
Residential 1 to 2 du/ac ( 20.76 +/- Acres)




Proposed Change Area
Residential 1 to 2 du/ac
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac

SOUTH MOUNTAIN AVE




19TH AVE




PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac ( 20.76 +/- Acres)



Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac


SOUTH MOUNTAIN AVE




19TH AVE




Page 477
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 200 W WASHINGTON ST PHOENIX, AZ 85003 (602) 262-6882

APPLICATION NO: GPA-SM-3-21-8_BW ACRES: 20.76 +/-
VILLAGE: South Mountain COUNCIL DISTRICT: 8
APPLICANT: Paul Gilbert / Cassandra Ayres
EXISTING:
Residential 1 to 2 du/ac ( 20.76 +/- Acres)




Proposed Change Area
Residential 1 to 2 du/acre
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/acre
SOUTH MOUNTAIN AVE




19TH AVE




PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac ( 20.76 +/- Acres)




Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/acre

SOUTH MOUNTAIN AVE




19TH AVE




Page 478
Attachment C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-SM-3-21-8

Date of VPC Meeting December 14, 2021

Request To amend the General Plan Land Use Designation on
approximately 20.76 acres from Residential 1 to 2
dwelling units per acre to Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling
units per acre
Proposed Use Single-family residential community

Location Southwest corner of 19th Avenue and South Mountain
Avenue
VPC Recommendation Continued to the January 11, 2021 South Mountain
Village Planning Committee meeting.

VPC Vote 11-0 Motion passed; Members Aldama, Brooks, Brownell,
Busching, Coleman, Hare, Holmerud, Shepard, Viera,
Marchuk and Daniels in favor; None in dissent.

VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

Cases GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8 were heard concurrently.

Nine members of the public registered to speak on this item. Eight members
registered in opposition and one neutral.

Enrique Bojórquez, staff, introduced himself and provided a presentation for the
Minor General Plan amendment case GPA-SM-3-21-8 and concurrent rezoning
case Z-58-21-8. He discussed the location of the site, noting surrounding land
uses, existing General Plan Land Use map designations, and the proposed
designation on the site. He discussed the existing zoning in the area and
requested zoning for the site. He discussed policy documents including the
General Plan and Rio Montaña Area Plan. The conceptual site plan for the
proposed single-family subdivision was shown, indicating vehicular access
points, lot distribution, building height limitations, and lot widths proposed. The
conceptual front elevations were discussed. He concluded the presentation by
providing a staff recommendation of approval for both cases and describing the
proposed stipulations for case Z-58-21-8, as presented in the staff report.




Page 479
Greg Brownell asked for an explanation on why the rezoning and minor General
Plan amendment cases were being presented concurrently. Some committee
members requested for these cases to be heard separately moving forward. He
is unsure if this is due to staff incompetence or laziness.

Mr. Bojórquez stated that rezoning and minor General Plan amendment cases
can run on a concurrent hearing schedule if approved by the Planning and
Development Department Director.

Paul Gilbert, with Beus Gilbert and McGroder PLLC, introduced himself as the
applicant and discussed the location of the site. He discussed the proposed
Minor General Plan Amendment and requested zoning. He discussed the
previous proposed site plan which was presented in the staff report, and the
updated site plan proposed. Wall elevations were presented and discussed, in
addition to the front building elevations proposed. He discussed the goals and
policies from the General Plan and Rio Montaña Area Plan. Rezoning case
stipulations presented in the staff report were discussed and concluded the
presentation by discussing the outreach conducted on these projects.

Chairwoman Daniels asked if the committee had any questions for the applicant
or staff regarding these cases. She stated that the site plan from 2018 provided
better features than the current site plan proposed.

Chuck Chisholm, with KHovnanian Homes, discussed the updated site plan and
why this is an enhancement over what was previously proposed.

Chairwoman Daniels asked if the entrance to the community could be located
on South Mountain Avenue instead.

Mr. Gilbert stated that his team preferred to have the access point along South
Mountain Avenue, but this was moved to 19th Avenue following the feedback
from the neighborhood.

Edward Aldama stated that there should be considerations on building a
sidewalk to the trailhead further south of the site.

George Brooks asked if the Phoenix Food Action Plan had been read.

Mr. Gilbert stated that his team had read this document and actually had a
community garden planned as part of their original proposal, but some of the
neighbors asked for this to be removed. His team will consider this as they move
forward with the cases.

Vice Chair Marchuk had compared both site plans and he asked if a bus stop
along 19th Avenue was provided just like the project east of 19th Avenue. He




Page 480
asked if the applicant would consider single-story home limitations and stated
that the fencing proposed along the perimeters does not feel appropriate.

Mr. Gilbert stated that a bus stop will be provided if the city requests one.

Mr. Aldama stated that the city is growing and discussed change across the city.
He discussed view fencing proposed on another project.

Chairwoman Daniels asked for additional questions from the committee. She
then opened the floor for public comments on this case.

Donatus Agbkwu donated his time to Jewel Clark, while Rebekah ad Steven
Higginbotham donated their time to Zach Brooks.

Jewel Clark, member of the public, lives in the area and stated that she has not
seen the latest version of the site plan shown by the applicant. She showed a
presentation on the history of the site, noting a similar application filed 2018 for
the site. The use is inappropriate for the area and compared the previous site
plan from the 2018 rezoning case with the current case. She discussed customer
reviews for the home builder, property owners opposed to this case, and zoning
designations in the general area. She discussed flooding issues and described
how the project differed from the Phoenix General Plan goals. She does not
support this development.

Zach Brooks, member of the public, owns the Arizona Worm Farm south of the
site. He showed a presentation on the opposition from neighbors surrounding this
site, and history on a similar application filed 2018 for the property. He compared
the site plan with the site plan for rezoning case Z-31-21-8, across 19th Avenue,
noting requested changes to the layout, open space, lot widths and seeking a
compromise from the developer. He asked for the proposal to be rejected due to
numerous reasons and asked for site plan modifications if the project moved
forward.

Mike Josic, member of the public, introduced himself and agrees with the
comments from Ms. Clark and Mr. Brooks. He discussed the proposed site plan
and asked for a recommendation of denial on the case.

Dean Chiarelli, member of the public, introduced himself and encouraged the
committee to adhere to the General Plan Land Use Map designation and Food
Action Plan. He asked the committee to keep the promise made by the city
regarding the site.

Dianne Olivo, member of the public, introduced herself and stated that she has
invested in a historic property where she lives. If agriculture is destroyed, it
affects the entire community. She is shocked at the comments made tonight and
stated that there are other active projects by this applicant in the area.




Page 481
Patti Trites, member of the public, introduced herself and described the flooding
hazard that exists in the general area. She asked that the site plan be overlaid
with the Maricopa County drainage maps. She discussed infrastructure in the
area, discouraging access along 19th Avenue. She discussed the 2018 site plan
overlaid with the County drainage maps.

Chuck Chisholm stated that KHovnanian Homes leads the industry, and they
provide surveys to homeowners to ensure that they are satisfied with their new
homes.

Mr. Gilbert stated that flooding will be addressed with the new infrastructure and
discussed the opposition comments and discussed the feedback received from
the community. His team is willing to move the street access point to South
Mountain Avenue.

Marcia Busching stated that there have been lots of changes made which have
not been reviewed by some. She is not supportive of the project at this time.

George Brooks stated that change is up to the decision makers and agrees with
Ms. Busching.

Mr. Brownell agrees with Ms. Busching and Dr. Brooks, and no longer wishes to
vote concurrently on Minor General Plan Amendment and rezoning cases
concurrently.

Vice Chair Marchuk shares the concerns with the neighborhood. He is not
comfortable with the General Plan Amendment request and would like to see a
compromise occur following the discussion between the neighbors and applicant.

Gene Holmerud asked for clarification.

Chairwoman Daniels and Vice Chair Marchuk stated that the applicant should
address the following items:

• Edit the fencing plan proposed;
• Provide a bus stop pad along 19th Avenue;
• Limit homes to one story;
• Provide a decomposed granite trail;
• Provide more centrally located open space;
• Provide a large open space area along 19th Avenue;

Ms. Busching asked the applicant if he would accept a continuance of the
cases.




Page 482
Mr. Gilbert stated that he would prefer a decision be made tonight but would be
okay with a continuance if desired by the committee on the cases.

Chairwoman Daniels requested for additional discussion or a motion.


DISCUSSION – GPA-SM-3-21-8:
Mr. Holmerud stated that rezoning and minor General Plan Amendment cases
should not be heard concurrently.

MOTION – GPA-SM-3-21-8:
Ms. Busching motioned to continue case GPA-SM-3-21-8 to the January 11,
2021 South Mountain Village Planning Committee meeting. Ms. Shepard
seconded the motion to continue.

VOTE – GPA-SM-3-21-8:
11-0, motion passed; Members Aldama, Brooks, Brownell, Busching, Coleman,
Hare, Holmerud, Shepard, Viera, Marchuk and Daniels in favor; None in dissent.


STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:

None.




Page 483
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-SM-3-21-8

Date of VPC Meeting January 11, 2022

Request To amend the General Plan Land Use Designation on
approximately 20.76 acres from Residential 1 to 2
dwelling units per acre to Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling
units per acre
Proposed Use Single-family residential community

Location Southwest corner of 19th Avenue and South Mountain
Avenue
VPC Recommendation Denied

VPC Vote 10-4-1 Motion passed; Members Alvarez, Brownell,
Busching, Hare, Holmerud, Ray, Said, Smith, Viera, and
Marchuk in favor; Aldama, Greathouse, Shepard and
Daniels in dissent. Member Coleman abstained.

VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

Cases GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8 were heard concurrently.

Seventeen members of the public registered to speak in opposition to this item.

Enrique Bojórquez, staff, introduced himself and provided a presentation for the
Minor General Plan amendment case GPA-SM-3-21-8 and concurrent rezoning
case Z-58-21-8. He discussed the location of the site, noting surrounding land
uses, existing General Plan Land Use map designations, and the proposed
designation on the site. He discussed the existing zoning in the area and
requested zoning for the site. He showed the conceptual site plan provided by
the applicant as part of the Addendum A staff report, and also showed a new
version of the site plan provided by the applicant following this latest addendum
to the staff report. He indicated vehicular access points, lot distribution, building
height limitations, and lot widths proposed. The applicant also provided a wall
elevation and wall plan exhibit following the Addendum A staff report. These
were shown and discussed. He concluded the presentation by providing a staff
recommendation of approval for both cases but noted that the if the committee
chose to approve case Z-58-21-8 per the latest site plan, wall plan and wall
elevations provided by the applicant, that stipulation numbers 1, 6, 9 and 9.E




Page 484
would need to be modified from what was presented in the Addendum A staff
report. He discussed the stipulation modifications that would be required.

Cassandra Ayres, with Beus Gilbert and McGroder PLLC, introduced herself as
the applicant and discussed the location of the site. She discussed the proposed
Minor General Plan Amendment and requested zoning. She discussed the latest
proposed site plan following the Addendum A staff report, and changes made
from the previous site plan. She discussed the goals and policies from the
General Plan, Rio Montaña Area Plan, and Housing Phoenix Plan. She
concluded the presentation by requesting approval of the project.

Twanna Ray inquired on the door-to-door outreach conducted and neighborhood
notification. She asked if a virtual neighborhood meeting had been conducted.

Ms. Ayres discussed the outreach conducted and stated that both in-person and
virtual neighborhood meetings had been conducted.

Ms. Ray asked on the proposed price-point on the homes.

Ms. Ayres stated that the homes are currently estimated between $500,000 and
$600,000 each.

Mr. Arthur Greathouse inquired about traffic and how pedestrians will be
affected.

Ms. Ayres stated that the project will provide street improvements, in addition to
trails and sidewalks.

Vice Chair Marchuk asked if a community benefit agreement was entered.

Ms. Ayres responded that no agreements were planned.

Emma Viera asked how the developer was addressing the Climate Action Plan.

Ms. Ayres stated that the project was providing smaller streets, shade trees, and
other elements. She is happy to work with the Office of Heat Response and
Mitigation on tree selection for this community.

Fatima Said asked if the applicant is looking into changes into the open space
areas where turf is shown. She asked if a community garden had been
considered.

Ms. Ayres responded that a garden had been considered, but some of the
community members did not support this amenity.




Page 485
Vice Chair Marchuk asked if a community benefit agreement was under
consideration.

Ms. Ayres responded that no agreements were planned at this time.

Chairwoman Daniels has noticed that when community gardens get planted,
these are not maintained over time.

Ms. Viera asked how this development is bringing change to South Phoenix.

Ms. Ayres and Mr. Chuck Chisholm, with KHovnanian Homes, discussed street
improvements and infrastructure proposed.

Chairwoman Daniels asked for additional questions from the committee. She
then opened the floor for public comments on this case.

Jewel Clark, Mike Josic, Norberto Rivera, Bryan Martin, Ravi Sharma, Snighda
Sharma, Leticia Rivera, Gina Johnson, Dorothy Hallock, JoAnne Jensen, Steven
Higginbotham, Erin Hegedus, Miguel Rubio, and Robert Barnes donated their
time to Zach Brooks.

Zach Brooks, member of the public, owns the Arizona Worm Farm south of the
site. He stated that rezoning is not a right and showed a presentation on the
opposition from neighbors surrounding this site and discussed how the density
on this project will not have a big impact on the housing shortage in Phoenix. The
density proposed is not the highest and best use of the land, comparing the
proposed home values for this project with the Silva Estates subdivision west of
the site which is zoned R1-18. He mentioned that a lower density will not affect
the profitability of the project and compared costs plus profits. He stated that
most properties surrounding this site oppose the proposed development and
showed a map depicting those properties. He concluded the presentation by
showing an email from the developer on Kimura Gardens across 19th Avenue
seeking rezoning under case Z-31-21-8, stating that this project is different than
that project and has some design shortcomings. He asked for the project to be
denied based on all of these reasons.

Dean Chiarelli, member of the public, introduced himself and stated that he
supports development and requests that Chairwoman Daniels abstain from
voting due to her realtor background. He discussed previous projects involving
Ms. Daniels.

Chairwoman Daniels stated that she is willing to meet with Mr. Chiarelli and the
City Attorney to discuss this matter.

Dianne Olivo, member of the public, introduced herself and stated that the
current zoning on the property remains viable and the proposed project will




Page 486
impact the area negatively. Agriculture is important and outlined the reasons why
this project is not compatible with the area.

Lee Coleman asked which development option was used for the site plan.

Ms. Ayres responded that the Planned Residential Development (PRD) option
was used.

Ms. Ray asked Mr. Zach Brooks to outline his opposition to this project.

Mr. Brooks responded that a similar lot layout is being proposed as the previous
site plan, and other elements as discussed by the Kimura Gardens developer
who is working on case Z-31-21-8. Their project is support by some, but this
rezoning case is not well supported by the most in the community.

Vice Chair Marchuk stated that the level of opposition is clear on this project,
and the community surrounding the site are in opposition.

Mr. Zach Brooks believes that a three-quarter vote can be triggered by an
overwhelming number of properties who oppose the project.

Marcia Busching wants to hear from Mr. Brooks on what changes he can
support on this project based on the community’s input.

Mr. Brooks stated that this project differs from Kimura Gardens, and the
community asked for changes to be made on the site plan to keep the flavor and
flow of the area. He seeks R1-18 zoning on the site to protect the unique area
and asked for a denial on this case. He wants for the entrance to be located
along 19th Avenue and other changes to the layout.

Kay Shepard stated that layout could be improved, and lots rearranged. She has
always supported protecting farmland, but this type of land needs lots of water.

Edward Aldama echo’s Ms. Shepard’s comments and stated that he has visited
the site. He feels this is a viable proposal because there are other similar projects
in the area.

Ms. Busching asked if the applicant would consider a continuance on the
rezoning case.

Ms. Ayres responded that the applicant prefers a recommendation this evening.

Ms. Ray prefers that the VPC give a recommendation on the cases.

Vice Chair Marchuk asked if the committee could deny the R1-10 zoning and
approve it as R1-18 instead.




Page 487
Mr. Bojórquez responded that the committee could deny the case as filed and
approve it as R1-18. However, the site has existing approved R1-18 zoning
currently that is not yet vested.

Ms. Busching is considering approving the R1-10 zoning with minimum 70-foot-
wide lots.

Ms. Ayres does not have a comment now about that.

Ms. Ray serves in the VPC to make a difference and often sees developers that
host virtual meetings only, which present an unfair advantage to the community.
We need to have a greater interest in the community.

Ms. Busching and Vice Chair Marchuk asked for staff on clarification on the
existing approved R1-18 zoning on the site.

Mr. Bojórquez discussed the existing approved R1-18 zoning currently on the
property.

Lee Coleman asked if S-1 zoning originated from the annexation of the property.

Mr. Bojórquez discussed the S-1 zoning and designations assigned to property
upon annexation.

Ms. Shepard, Mr. Brownell, and Mr. Bojórquez discussed approved zoning
and administration of this by the City.



MOTION – GPA-SM-3-21-8:

Mr. Brownell motioned to deny case GPA-SM-3-21-8. Mr. Holmerud seconded
the motion.

VOTE – GPA-SM-3-21-8:

10-4-1; Members Alvarez, Brownell, Busching, Hare, Holmerud, Ray, Said,
Smith, Viera, and Marchuk in favor; Aldama, Greathouse, Shepard and Daniels
in dissent. Member Coleman abstained.

Ashley Hare left the meeting at 9:00pm, bringing the quorum to 14 members.


STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:

None.



Page 488
Attachment D


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
February 3, 2022

ITEM NO: 6
DISTRICT NO.: 8
SUBJECT:

Application #: GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Continued from 1/6/2022)
Location: Southwest corner of 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue
From: Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre
To: Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre
Acreage: 20.76
Proposal: A minor General Plan Amendment to allow single-family residential up to
3.5 dwelling units per acre.
Applicant: Paul Gilbert and Cassandra Ayres, Beus Gilbert McGroder, PLLC
Owner: P.W. Again, LLC
Representative: Paul Gilbert and Cassandra Ayres, Beus Gilbert McGroder, PLLC

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
South Mountain 12/14/2021 Continued. Vote: 11-0.
South Mountain 1/11/2022 Denial. Vote: 10-4 (1 abstained).

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the staff recommendation, with an
additional stipulation.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Commissioner Johnson made a MOTION to approve GPA-SM-3-21-8, per the
staff recommendation.

Maker: Johnson
Second: Gaynor
Vote: 6-2 (Busching, Perez)
Absent: None
Opposition Present: Yes

Findings:

1. The subject site exceeds 10 acres, which requires a minor General Plan Amendment
to the Land Use Map.

2. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation of Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling
units per acre is compatible with surrounding land uses.

3. The proposed land use designation is appropriate at the intersection of an arterial and
minor collector street.




Page 489
4. The companion Rezoning Case Z-58-21-8 includes standards that ensure consistency
in scale and character as well as appropriate transitions for adjacent single-family
zoned property.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.




Page 490
Attachment E

Racelle Escolar

From: JoAnne Jensen
Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 4:32 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: RE: GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8/ Andora



Hello – it has come to my attention that the stipulations and site plan for Andora have been modified to reflect the
agreement between our neighbors and the developer.

As a result, would it be possible to please withdraw my comments and my opposition, as they are now moot.

Thank you very much.

JoAnne Jensen
8303 So 17th Drive
Phoenix AZ 85041
480‐213‐6499

From: JoAnne Jensen
Sent: Tuesday, February 1, 2022 5:24 PM
To: 'pdd.planningcomm@phoenix.gov'
Subject: GPA‐SM‐3‐21‐8 and Z‐58‐21‐8/ Andora

Hello – thank you for taking my comments with respect to the proposed K Hovnanian development on the southwest
corner of 19th Avenue and South Mountain.

I join others in opposing rezoning the parcel from S‐1 to R1‐10, along with the plans for the development itself. S‐1 is
active agriculture and horse property with lots one acre or more and in no way either follows the guidelines in the Rio
Montana Plan and the 2015 Phoenix General Plan (which match one another). Specifically, these two plans call for
lower density south of Baseline toward South Mountain Park; new construction that fits in with the currently in place
surrounding neighborhoods; and new construction that involves unique housing designs, staggered lot sizes, open
fencing, open spaces and other hallmarks of a unified character.

Unfortunately, this K Hovnanian proposal follows none of those guidelines with cookie‐cutter style homes on small lots –
like so much other development in the Valley. There is nothing that distinguishes this set of homes nor do they fit with
the existing homes.

Preservation versus development is difficult, particularly in an environment when there is a housing shortage. There are
locations which are well suited to dense development – but South Mountain is not one of them. This is a rural /
agricultural / equestrian community. Those of us who live here have purposely chosen a country lifestyle and dense /
bland looking homes on small lots is development incompatible with this section of Phoenix.

To be honest, as people who live here, we would like to have a say in the appearance and development of our
neighborhood and to know that our voices will carry some weight in these matters. We do not oppose development –
everything changes, but we would like to feel we have a seat at the table when these decisions are made, and that
developers are not allowed carte blanche.

In sum, please oppose this development in its current configuration. We are working with this developer to try to find
common ground – a suggestion is to continue these requests until an agreement can be reached, at which time this
Commission can evaluate a plan which has agreement on both sides.


Page1 491
Thank you.

JoAnne Jensen
480‐213‐6499
8303 S. 17th Drive
Phoenix AZ 85041




Page2 492
REVISED PETITION (AFTER STAFF REPORT)

PETITION IN SUPPORT OF ANDORA RESIDENTIAL

To the Mam, City Council and City Clerk:
We, the undersigned, support the proposed residential project located west of the southwest corner of 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue. This rezoning request would
result in a gated, residential community consisting of upscale, for-sale homes. A residential neighborhood at this location is an excellent fit and would be a welcomed addition to
this community.

Signature Printed Name Address Date

1. ili‘l-kl Pil )(ilK_ -713\DIV g c)(o P(

.
3. \r\orrNseiv-\ L1/4, \-b,i-e\1/4-ó-c-‘
. tbs\Ab- tC\

' _..----- 1-\--\51Roi_ D 2 -2.-e-3\ u\1'/\--\'0\KzeA\ fd\
5. ,7 V—e '\ I 01
IV\ erOL 2Vn \A; V \ ()YON eAlk
Page 493
6.GA gy it l>I )e 21 4 Whedo gle9)
e ,_ 170
c._2
_IAe(/ vzé,
8. ke‘i ç H
1 \)Afirvü 9 '


9. lizg \,) )ri\,s l-y\-e_
Piy,t, itsi--z_ynt.)) •R Q,/
/ ift, 6,),..„,..)- ,,,,,,,,5-
10. * it, A CLEX25 7 , / \7Z-it (2), -A 'Thy Az_ 3:_oi-i(
N ;,e-104na U. it -z
Mk( fe.: —
it .6/ 47-) [7/3 », ,A.-po »ervo 7 --) ,A$/ A-2- 3s-eV S / -2-1/ 2: j
_
12. LhAVA o\ ow Cblia. Ill- _%• \ n \v, AvQ Pk eett IALEsc) 4-1 ei27 Í j- /
_________________________
lç3 \( Aelt-I f1 (414 R-t5t(
,,---
14. --2(K--4 ‘ ..- lir g5( zzAd (LO
15 ,,..--n._ --- .1‘Ufv3er -\---ce_( -/Ate efin Sc- ?(`befOç t(65A( ti 71 1(
PETITION IN SUPPORT OF ANDORA RESIDENTIAL

To the Mayor, City Council and City Clerk:
We, the undersigned, support the proposed residential project located west of the southwest corner of 19' Avenue and South Mountain Avenue. This rezoning request would
result in a gated, residential community consisting of upscale, for-sale homes. A residential neighborhood at this location is an excellent fit and would be a welcomed addition to
this community.


Signature Printed Name Address Date

1.
__ ef 2( ,22 1,,-) /4 ( ( e_,--‘ 2:.- ,.
., ,...„ - - (...._,z,..4e,
....)2.,,,,-; t1--1 7--i-e .6.en F.. ,4J____ ,274
J '.;-? (iitx:
. ./.1
2. ,-
1. 4//17(1.-17' / (--I A , ,• - re_ /Zi t.c?) L-e2 Ai. (e- • Pt. oe ' •
'
7 ( IN A
3. . .,
‘,..i , ,01,11 r\ ' , i. --/ " u--) , 1- ' i. (v--\ SI- ., 71
r.:-..
n. ..
. . ,i.
4. , r'7\
Au, *- k, :lit ,.,..•
- a .
A,

ys, ei 4,,,;,..„

Page 494 6. :JÄ 1,4J ,,,‘g,"
7. , e
., --le \\..,-,1„.- ' 24_
_ , --- ,
8. /-?
;.:, 2, I
-. . -.,--,„,..
L e )1 , e ON.e c_ zrz.
,
2 :' L
( 7 ..,.,.
9. 'f ',z-4,,) 1
.. n_i.---) ,---r, ii. L. , v--,
10. ;-....:-,/,,,,
(..„...)
( 4'
-_, --c-,-.9-,/
1 1 . _-


12.

13.

14.

15.
Attachment F

Racelle Escolar

From: Erin Hegedus
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 2:59 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Adriana Garcia Maximiliano; Council District 8 PCC
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8



I am writing to oppose the request to rezone the referenced proposals.

This request was rejected by the Village Planning Commission four years ago and again in January of this year.

The amount of homes and the style of homes strongly conflict with the surrounding community and do not
add any value to the neighborhood or does it maintain the rural character of this unique area.

Specifically, to allow 2 to 3.5 dwellings per acre would negatively impact the neighborhood in regards to traffic
congestion and safety. South Mountain Avenue is a 1 lane road at points and has two elementary schools that
when school is in session, the roads are completely backed up.

Additionally, this developer has not listened to the neighbors in regards to our asking for a better design and
fewer homes. Maintaining the rural character of the neighborhood, maintaining open spaces or considerations
for heat mitigation. They have only stated that they are interested in building as many homes as possible at a
cost that will be profitable to them. This does not sound to me or the over 30 neighbors that are in
opposition.

I ask you to either oppose or continue this case in order that the developer make an effort to build a
development that would enhance not detract from the current characteristic.

Thank you for your time,

Erin Hegedus, CMRP
8630 South 19th Avenue
Phoenix, AZ 85041
602‐717‐3185




Page1 495
Racelle Escolar

From: Dean Chiarelli
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2022 2:46 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Opposition: Andora GPA-SM-3-21-8 & Z-58-21-8



Re: Application #: GPA‐SM‐3‐21‐8 (Continued from 1/6/2022)
Application #: Z‐58‐21‐8 (Continued from 1/6/2022)

I oppose both cases and request to speak about both items.

I am a Registered Dietitian Nutritionist, a Registered Environmental Health Specialist, and a homeowner & resident in
South Phoenix for 10 years. I oppose the amendment to the General Plan Land Use and Rezoning because the right
developer will be able to profit without the need to amend and rezone. Andora is a generic and dull housing
development that adds very little to South Mountain. Strong community opposition is well‐documented: excess traffic
on one‐lane roads, emergency vehicle access, negative environmental impact on agriculture (heat, water scarcity), and
loss of prime land well‐suited agricultural enterprise (per PlanPHX 2015 and the South Mountain Food Plan) such as
“agritainment”. The City of Phoenix traffic study for the area is 10+ years old. It does not provide objective data for
Dobbins Corridor in 2022 with all the new houses not yet built.

I am Pro‐Development and believe with confidence the right developer(s) will be able to profit without the need to
amend and rezone this land in a way that will inevitably reduce the quality of life for existing residents. The Grandma's
Farm™, and the Farm at South Mountain™ are great examples of the type of enterprises I advocate for. The Planning
Commission should prioritize & value prime land as best used for development such as the AZ Fresh™ Food and
Innovation Hub in the Rio Salado area. If residential development occurs it needs to comply with existing zoning. I
demand the Planning Commission balance the abundant and quick approvals of higher‐density real estate with cultural
amenities and businesses which honor the existing zoning. South Mountain is unique. It does not need more gas
stations, fast‐food, and storage units, and cookie‐cutter development.

Several SMVPC member, including Chair, are realtors and there is a perceived conflict of interest in which Planners go on
to profit commercially AFTER they participate in a Planning business. I recorded in detail my concerns in opposition
letters to SMVPC. Conflicts of interest are defined in the Village Planning Handbook page 8, and City of Phoenix Ethics
Handbook‐ Employees & Volunteers page 9




Page1 496
Source: https://www.phoenix.gov/villagessite/Documents/pdd_pz_pdf_00020.pdf#search=village%20planning%20handbook
Accessed January 11, 2022




Page2 497
Source:https://www.phoenix.gov/citymanagersite/Documents/Ethics/Ethics_Handbook_Employee_Volunteers.pdf
Accessed: January 11, 2022

During the last meeting, I asked a general question to SMVPC:
“How will you know how much amending and rezoning is too much”?


Page3 498
The Village Planning Committee handbook, on pages 6 ‐8, identifies some key points to consider for land use map
amendments and rezoning.

Is there a conflict between the proposed land use and physical constraints or the environmental sensitivity of the area?
Yes, the issue is well‐documented with increased traffic, increased heat, flooding problems, and reduced capacity for
emergency vehicles restricted by one‐lane roads (19th Avenue and Dobbins Road). The impact of emergency vehicles
should not be under‐estimated. The project has only one entry.

How does the proposed change affect the underlying character of the area?
Yes, there is a demonstrated negative impact to access the 19th Avenue Trail in South Mountain park because of
increased congestion, traffic, reduced views, loss of space in the surrounding areas.

Does the proposed land use have any positive or negative impacts on goals and policies within the general plan?
Yes, there is a negative impact because it reduces the capacity to carry out the portions of PlanPHX (2015) and the 2025
Food Action Plan.

Many residents, including myself, carefully study zoning before making the decision to purchase a home. South
Mountain’s excessive rezoning and amending the GPA is a broken promise. The opportunity cost for excessive
development in South Mountain, including Andora, is too high. The Planning Commission and South Mountain Village
Planning Committee are deviating from smart growth. Whoever has the most expensive attorneys are
winning. Developers are bulldozing & paving their way to profit with little regard to opposition and real concerns about
quality‐of‐life and preservation of existing zoning. Phoenix is poised to be an agricultural hub and food innovation
center. The South Mountain Village (District 8) is ideally suited to be part of this longer‐term infrastructure. Again, I am
"Pro‐Development" and there is too much higher‐density development, too fast, and not balanced by smart
growth. These case items have immense opposition from the community and should NOT be approved.

Sincerely,

Dean Chiarelli


Dean Chiarelli, MA, RDN, CEP, CHES, REHS
Clinical Assistant Professor



500 North 3rd Street | Phoenix, AZ 85004
Ph: 602.496.1867 | dean.chiarelli@asu.edu
https://nursingandhealth.asu.ed [nursingandhealth.asu.edu]




Page4 499
Racelle Escolar

From: Hegedus, Erin
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2022 3:04 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8



I am very concerned about overall the development of this area, this area if developed, should be done I a way
that would enhance the neighborhood not to just bring in more housing, regardless of infrastructure that
does not support all of the growth.

Equally concerning is something I want to bring to your attention.

Southwest Phoenix in the 85041 area is the only remaining agriculture that is left in the city. Up until recently,
these fields were growing corn, cotton, alfalfa. Recently a number of developers are asking to rezone to build
homes. Modifying the density to up to 4 homes per acre with block walls.

Our neighbors have been fighting to retain the rural characteristics of the neighborhood but the Planning
Commissions seems to be pro development and support the housing proposals without regard to the
neighbors that have live with the extra housing that brings noise, traffic, night lights that obscure the starts,
heat and other nuisances.

Respectfully,

Erin Hegedus
8630 South 19th Avenue
Phoenix, AZ 85041



This transmission, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
information that is confidential, proprietary, legally privileged, or otherwise protected by law from disclosure. Any
unauthorized review, use, copying, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, or the
person responsible for delivering this to an addressee, you should notify the sender immediately by telephone or by
reply e‐mail, and destroy all copies of the original message.




Page1 500
From: Dorothy Hallock
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: Opposition to Andora
Date: Tuesday, February 1, 2022 1:38:28 PM




I am opposed to GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8, the proposed Andora development by K. Hovnanian.

The project entry on W. South Mountain Ave. would create a hazard because of significantly increased traffic on a
one lane road used by pedestrians (including school children), cyclists, and equestrians.

The proposed density and design are completely out of character with adjacent properties and the neighborhood.

I request time to speak, but donate my time to Zach Brooks.

Respectfully,
Dorothy Hallock
2050 W. South Mountain Ave.
Phoenix, AZ 85041



Sent from my iPhone




Page 501
Racelle Escolar

From: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: FW: Planning Commission meeting comments for 2/2/22 - Opposition to cases GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8,
item #6 and #7



From: H. Jewel Clark
Sent: Tuesday, February 1, 2022 2:42 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Planning Commission meeting comments for 2/2/22 ‐ Opposition to cases GPA‐SM‐3‐21‐8 and Z‐58‐21‐8, item #6 and #7

I am writing in opposition to Agenda items 6 and 7, cases GPA‐SM‐3‐21‐8 and Z‐58‐21‐8. The immediate area around the property requesting
rezoning from S‐1 to R1‐10 is S‐1 active agriculture and horse properties, plus acre+ lots with custom homes. The highest density currently built is
to R1‐18 across the street. Our area has followed the guidelines laid out in the Rio Montana Plan and the 2015 Phoenix General Plan (which
upholds the design guidelines of the Rio Montana Plan) and those guidelines call for:

 Lower density south of Baseline and towards South Mountain Park
 New construction should fit in with the surrounding neighborhoods‐ contextualism
 New construction should follow certain design guidelines like no 'garagescaping', unique housing designs, staggered lot sizes, open
fencing, open spaces, etc. ‐ certainty of character

The proposed plan by K Hovnanian follows none of those guidelines. They seek to plop the same cookie‐cutter style houses crammed onto tiny lots
that can be found anywhere in the Valley with no regard to the neighborhood that is already in place. They argue that Phoenix needs new homes.
They argue that the development across the street is positioned to have their zoning approved at R1‐10.

 Phoenix will not be a livable city if you continue to let developers gobble up land without regard to the development requirements the
city is supposed to uphold.
o You have the obligation to require this
 Existing residents have lost faith in the process to protect their properties from inappropriate development.
o You have the power to restore it
 Existing residents should have more say in what their neighborhoods look like than developers.
o Help us

You aren't going to solve the housing shortage with indiscriminate development.

The city is supposed to encourage diversity of development. There is no diversity when every piece of open property is getting rezoned for higher
and higher density that is better suited closer to the city core. Larger properties and agricultural land is being gobbled up and it's now rare and
precious. It should be preserved. There is plenty of high density property in the valley. Help us protect the low density property that remains.

As a united neighborhood, we didn't want the other development to be rezoned. If we'd possessed the power to stop it, we would have. We don't
want this property rezoned. This density is utterly incompatible with the surrounding homes and properties. The proposed housing designs do not
fit with our area.

Neighborhoods are at a complete disadvantage here. We don't have deep pockets. Lawyers won't even represent us b/c they don't want to make
developers angry and lose out on business. We're not land use experts. We all have other jobs besides fighting for our neighborhoods. We deserve
and need your help to make Phoenix development something to be proud of. We understand development is inevitable. But it can be done well or
poorly. It should be done with the support of the existing neighbors. We already live here. We deserve to be listened to. We don't want this
development. Please vote no on both cases. Thank you.

Jewel Clark
2020 West South Mountain Ave.
Phoenix, AZ 85041

‐‐
H. Jewel Clark
hjewelclark@fastmail.com




Page1 502
Racelle Escolar

From: JoAnne Jensen
Sent: Tuesday, February 1, 2022 5:24 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8/ Andora



Hello – thank you for taking my comments with respect to the proposed K Hovnanian development on the southwest
corner of 19th Avenue and South Mountain.

I join others in opposing rezoning the parcel from S‐1 to R1‐10, along with the plans for the development itself. S‐1 is
active agriculture and horse property with lots one acre or more and in no way either follows the guidelines in the Rio
Montana Plan and the 2015 Phoenix General Plan (which match one another). Specifically, these two plans call for
lower density south of Baseline toward South Mountain Park; new construction that fits in with the currently in place
surrounding neighborhoods; and new construction that involves unique housing designs, staggered lot sizes, open
fencing, open spaces and other hallmarks of a unified character.

Unfortunately, this K Hovnanian proposal follows none of those guidelines with cookie‐cutter style homes on small lots –
like so much other development in the Valley. There is nothing that distinguishes this set of homes nor do they fit with
the existing homes.

Preservation versus development is difficult, particularly in an environment when there is a housing shortage. There are
locations which are well suited to dense development – but South Mountain is not one of them. This is a rural /
agricultural / equestrian community. Those of us who live here have purposely chosen a country lifestyle and dense /
bland looking homes on small lots is development incompatible with this section of Phoenix.

To be honest, as people who live here, we would like to have a say in the appearance and development of our
neighborhood and to know that our voices will carry some weight in these matters. We do not oppose development –
everything changes, but we would like to feel we have a seat at the table when these decisions are made, and that
developers are not allowed carte blanche.

In sum, please oppose this development in its current configuration. We are working with this developer to try to find
common ground – a suggestion is to continue these requests until an agreement can be reached, at which time this
Commission can evaluate a plan which has agreement on both sides.

Thank you.

JoAnne Jensen
480‐213‐6499
8303 S. 17th Drive
Phoenix AZ 85041




Page1 503
December 9, 2021

To: South Mountain Village Planning Committee

Re: Opposition to Z-58-21 and GPA-SM-3-21-8 K. Hovnanian Andora Development

K. Hovnanian Homes” proposal to build 67 single family home on the 20 acres located
on the southwest corner of 19th Avenue and West South Mountain Avenue is
inappropriate in scale, density, and character in a neighborhood that consists of homes
on lots three quarters of an acre and larger, and active agricultural uses. The proposed
Andora site plan is a perfect example of the “dominoes in a row” lots that the Rio
Montana Plan uses to illustrate what NOT to build.

During an informational meeting held on December 7, K. Hovanian Homes’
representative, Chuck Chisholm”, admitted that he had never read the Rio Montana
Plan. After that statement, it was impossible to find credible his arguments that
Andora would benefit the neighborhood and was compatible with neighborhood
character.

Judging from linear grid site plan presented it is probable that Harrington Planning +
Design, the project’s designers, have never read the Rio Montana Plan either. The site
plan appears to have one overriding design factor: crowd as many lots as possible onto
the site, resulting in an unimaginative, generic “cookie cutter” subdivision that would
not enhance the character of the surrounding neighborhood.

The proposed Andora development would cut through the middle of a cohesive,
community, destroying the unique blend of homes on R1-18 and larger lots and small
specialty farms and tree nurseries which a define the character of our neighborhood.
The South Mountain Village Character Plan states that new development should
“[p]romote neighborhood identity through planning that reinforces the existing
landscaping and character of the area. Each new development should contribute to the
character identified for the village.” Our neighborhood character is spacious, diverse,
and green. The proposed Andora development is crowded, dominated by sameness,
and urban.

The Rio Montana Plan states on p. 22 that
The goal of any site plan should be sensitive to the surrounding area. This
includes the environment, to the existing development, the history of a place
and to the dreams of the community for the future.

A site plan for new development should consider not only the site and its
attributes, but also the larger context in which the site is located.




Page 504
The proposed Andora development does not respect the existing neighborhood
character, is inconsistent with the goals of the South Mountain Village Character Plan,
and disregards the planning and design guidelines of the Rio Montana Plan.

I respectfully ask the Committee Not to approve either the GPA or zoning change for
this project.




Dorothy M. Hallock
2050 W. South Mountain Ave.
Phoenix, AZ 85041




Page 505
From: Norberto
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8" in your subject line.
Date: Friday, December 10, 2021 4:54:25 PM


I live in the neighborhood and oppose the development as is proposed...

NORBERTO RIVERA




Page 506
From: Steven & Rebekah Higginbotham
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola; Council District 8 PCC
Subject: I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8
Date: Sunday, December 12, 2021 7:49:13 AM


I live near 19th Avenue and South Mountain and I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8
(aka the Andora project).

I would like to request time on the SMVPC agenda for Tuesday, December 14, 2021, at 6:00
p.m. and to then yield that time to Zach Brooks.

Best,
Rebekah




Page 507
From: Steven Higginbotham
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola; Council District 8 PCC
Subject: I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8
Date: Sunday, December 12, 2021 10:18:50 PM


I live near 19th Avenue and South Mountain and I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8
(aka the Andora project).

I would like to request time on the SMVPC agenda for Tuesday, December 14, 2021, at 6:00
p.m. and to then yield that time to Zach Brooks.

regards,
Steven Higginbotham
1804 w Magdalena Ln, Phoenix, AZ 85041




--
Steven Higginbotham




Page 508
From: Dianne Olivo
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: I/ we oppose am in Opposition of GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8
Date: Monday, December 13, 2021 11:15:01 AM




We wish to go on record as in opposition to this proposal for a number of reasons. Proven need for density increase.
Construction of another non descript Blight on pastoral agriculture.” Gardens “ may be name but not in design .
Etc as well as unacceptable address of toxic fumes from south property at 8811 S 19th Ave .

We have invested well over 1.5 million in our properties and maintaining the historic nature of this horse property.
No need to change zoning especially for financial doubling!
Ted and Dianne Olivo
8804 S 19th Ave and
8624 S 19th Ave




Page 509
From: Erin Hegedus
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: Re: I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8
Date: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 5:14:23 AM
Attachments: image001.png


I would like to add a comment that I signed a petition in August which was misrepresented to
me. I was in favor of upscale housing that followed The Rio Montana plan. Not this plan and I
resent the misrepresentation

Sent from my iPad


On Dec 13, 2021, at 6:47 PM, Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola gaxiola@phoenix.gov> wrote:



Thanks Erin, I will add this as well.

Have a great evening,

Enrique Bojórquez Gaxiola
Planner III
Planning & Development Department
Long Range Planning Division
200 W. Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Office: (602) 262-6949




***I am currently working remotely on a rotational schedule, but will be checking voicemails
multiple times per day. Please feel free to leave me a voice message or email me for a
more timely response. Thank you.***




From: Erin Hegedus
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 6:46 PM
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: RE: I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8

Thank you. I forgot to include my address:

8630 South 19th Avenue

Sent from Mail [go.microsoft.com] for Windows


Page 510
From: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 6:37 PM
To: Erin Hegedus
Subject: RE: I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8

Good evening Erin,

How are you? Thank you for providing this statement (below) regarding these two
cases. I will add this to the case file and will share it with the South Mountain VPC
ahead of our meeting tomorrow evening.

If questions arise, please contact me.

Regards,

Enrique Bojórquez Gaxiola
Planner III
Planning & Development Department
Long Range Planning Division
200 W. Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Office: (602) 262-6949




***I am currently working remotely on a rotational schedule, but will be checking voicemails
multiple times per day. Please feel free to leave me a voice message or email me for a
more timely response. Thank you.***




From: Erin Hegedus
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 6:33 PM
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8

Three years ago this plan was presented and the South Mountain Village Planning
Council objected to it.

We are here again to oppose this development. It has actually become even more
disturbing than originally presented because the developer is known for developing low
income housing, is not familiar with the Rio Montana Plan, stated that they are not
interested in building energy efficient homes and has not offered to the neighborhood
(the one time we were able to meet with them) any reason why we would this high



Page 511
density development would enhance our neighborhood.

The developer basically told our group on 12/6 that they are looking to build to meet
their profit margin.

Again, this is an out of state developer with no ties to the community. Additionally,
there has been no traffic plan conducted and the infrastructure does not support the
current traffic, let alone the addition of this development.

I ask that the council oppose this plan.

Our neighborhood cannot manage more traffic, more noise, more heat and a builder
that is just looking to make a fast buck, and our community is left behind to live with
this destruction of a beautiful and unique neighborhood.




Sent from Mail [go.microsoft.com] for Windows




Page 512
From: Patti Trites
To: Tamala Daniels; Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola; trentchristopher@gmail.com
Cc: Marcia Busching; twanna.bhna@yahoo.com; Greg Brownell; edward@yourgreatestself.com; Adriana Garcia
Maximiliano
Subject: Andora - Z-58-21-8 and GPA-SM-3-21-8
Date: Monday, December 13, 2021 12:01:49 PM


Dear Enrique,

I would like to register to speak at tomorrow's SMVPC Meeting.

I would also like to speak for Agenda Item # 8 & 9 for Z-58-21-8 companion case GPA-SM-
3-21-8
- Thank you in advance for contacting the Maricopa County Flood Control District and
looking at the flood maps of this property.
Housing placement is important in relation to any water flows that enter/exit the new
proposed community.
There has been reported flooding in that intersection of 19th Avenue and South Mountain.
Please adhere to the new COP Planning and Development Guidelines and overlay the new
proposed lots with the FLO-2D mapping of the area done by MCFCD. NOTE: An approved
Preliminary Plot is not a guarantee of the total number of lots allowed by the COP until D&G
is approved.

- 19th Avenue is unique and special in the City. It is a destination and marketed that
way by the City and State.
19th Avenue is the entrance to the South Mountain Trailhead: 19th Ave. (Ma-Ha-Tauk)
Trailhead at 10484 S. 19th Ave.
This is a HUGE marketing and benefit to the developer and future homeowners.
Per the COP own site: At more than 16,000 acres, South Mountain Park/Preserve is one of
the largest municipally managed parks in the nation and consists
of three mountain ranges - the Ma Ha Tauk, Gila and Guadalupe. The park boasts more
than 50 miles of trails for hiking, horseback riding and mountain
biking. Additionally, the roadways throughout the park are a favorite for bicyclists.

- Safety and the beauty of South Mountain should be maintained as new development
happens in the area.
Many people - residents and visitors - utilize 19th Avenue as their entrance onto South
Mountain Trailhead.
Keep it safe. Do not allow entrance or exits onto 19th avenue for new developments.
PLEASE keep the entrance and exit off of 19th avenue. Please move it to South
Mountain Avenue.
- Flood Control and COP are also planning on a 66" storm drain pipe and catch basins
along 19th Avenue to South Mountain.
Keep 19th Avenue free of resident traffic as possible for safety.

- Please keep the South Mountain Area looking complementary to its surroundings;
Avoid block walls 'prison' effect around the new communities.
- Please include plenty of plants/trees and Decorative Iron Fencing to surround the new
developments.
- Please include green spaces on the interior and exterior of the property.
The developer will gain $$ due to the location of this land and can make up the housing


Page 513
loss with the location premium.


Thank you.

Patti Trites
Homeowner in South Mountain
President of Southern Hills HOA

Cell: 402 213 7126
Email: pattihoash@gmail.com




Page 514
From: Ravi Sharma
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Cc: Ravi Sharma
Subject: I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8
Date: Monday, December 13, 2021 4:07:32 PM


Hello Mr. Bojorquez-gaxiola,

I live in the neighborhood and oppose the development as is proposed.

Thanks,

Dr. Sharma




Page 515
From: Ravi Sharma
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Cc: ushma sharma
Subject: I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8
Date: Monday, December 13, 2021 4:10:22 PM


Hello Mr. Bojorquez-gaxiola,

I live in the neighborhood and oppose the development as is proposed.

Thanks,

Mrs. Sharma




Page 516
From: Dean Chiarelli
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: December 14: SMVPC Meeting
Date: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 11:45:32 AM
Attachments: Outlook-rmpvn2ah.png
Outlook-o00zkkho.png


Mr. Bojorquez-Gaxiola:
I have been a South Mountain resident and homeowner for 9.5 years. I registered for the
South Mountain Village Planning Committee meeting on December 14th and would like to
comment if possible. In case I cannot speak, I’m documenting my opposition to three
rezoning items. The Committee should disapprove rezoning to increase the number of
residential units. The proposed changes will cause excessive vehicle traffic and congestion on
the local streets. The new homes currently under construction in the surrounding area are
not even fully built yet, and there is already much traffic at the intersection where 19th
Avenue meets Dobbins Road. Many of the streets in the rezoning area were built as "country
roads" -- not meant for higher-density residential developments. In the future, there should
be a new traffic study when the latest homes along the Dobbins corridor (7th Avenue to Loop
202) are occupied.
The right developers for this land should integrate their plans within the current zoning.   The
South Mountain area is a unique and historic location, and it is quickly becoming a generic
bedroom community with roads not built to meet the needs of higher-volume residential
developments.
_____________________________________________
Z-31-21-8 (Companion Case GPA-SM-2-21-8)- OPPOSE
GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8)- OPPOSE
Z-58-21-8 (Companion Case GPA-SM-3-21-8)- OPPOSE
_____________________________________________
Dean Chiarelli, Mobile phone 702-994-8077
Dean Chiarelli, MA, RDN, CEP, CHES, REHS
Clinical Assistant Professor



500 North 3rd Street | Phoenix, AZ 85004
Ph: 602.496.1867 | dean.chiarelli@asu.edu
https://nursingandhealth.asu.ed [nursingandhealth.asu.edu]









Page 517
Opposition to Cases GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8
Agenda items 7 and 8

The proposed Andora development is nearly identical to a development application of the same
name this committee voted against 10-2 in 2018. I and many of my neighbors oppose the
development as submitted for reasons outlined here.




Andora 2018




Andora 2021

This development does not conform to the Phoenix General Plan or the Rio Montana Plan as it
applies to our area.

Our area consists of:
RURAL CHARACTER
CUSTOM HOMES
LARGE LOTS
FARMS AND EQUESTRIAN PROPERTIES
RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE

Rural Character
We are a community of S-1 and R1-18 homes and properties. We purchased property in this
area, as did our neighbors, for the large lots, open space, and the quiet rural character we
currently enjoy. We know that the area will develop, and we support low density development
that preserves and enhances our rural character, and protects certainty and character as




Page 518
outlined in the Phoenix General Plan. We support housing designs and site planning that
conforms to the Rio Montana guidelines for our area: low density, rural, open spaces, staggered
lots, houses with alley garage entrances/side entrances.

The proposed density, cookie-cutter, garage-scaped housing designs of the Andora project, is
incompatible in scale and design and existing use to the surrounding area. It was incompatible
in 2018 and remains so today.

This area is swiftly losing its S-1 and R1-18 land as is the rest of the Valley. There is plenty of R1-
10 and higher density all around. Once lower density land is lost, it’s gone forever. Please
preserve what remains for future homeowners to enjoy what we already do.




Traffic
The increase in traffic along 19th Ave. and West South Mountain Ave. poses serious hazard to
existing residents. 19th Ave. is not an arterial street south of Baseline. It hasn’t had a traffic
count since 2012 and the area has seen exponential increase in development. West South
Mountain Ave. hasn’t had a traffic count since 2013 and narrows to one lane just west of the
proposed development. Tractors and other farm equipment regularly use both roadways. A
traffic report is warranted for the safety of the existing neighbors, and any future residents.

Flooding
Street flooding, esp. on the west side of 19th Ave. at W. South Mountain Ave. is particularly
dangerous. There is no timeline for approved flood mitigation by the city. Until that is in place,
development should favor low density.




Page 519
The photo below is just off the intersection at 19th Ave. and W. South Mountain Ave. on the
west side. The water is runoff from the park and when it comes down 19th Ave. it banks left and
has been so powerful it has bent steel fence posts.




K. Hovanian
A representative for K. Hovanian hosted an initial virtual presentation Oct. 20. The
neighborhood told them it was too dense, there were flooding issues, etc. There was little
contact afterwards until their lawyers arranged an in-person presentation Dec. 7. At that
meeting, Chuck Chisolm, Director of Planning and Entitlement, presented us with a slightly
revised plan with a density reduction of 5 houses. We brought up flooding issues, density, etc.
again. We asked questions about working with us to reduce the density, using more
appropriate housing designs for the area, etc. His response was that this is what K. Hovanian
does, and they really don’t deviate. It was basically, the same pitch line we kept getting from
Scott Ward in 2018, “Trust me, you’ll love it (but I’m not going to change it if you don’t).”

Mr. Chisolm, when asked, said, “I’ve heard of the Rio Montana Plan.” He admitted he has not
looked at it. It appears neither he nor his team have acquainted themselves with the area’s
design guidelines, which is witnessed by the poor site plan, and the housing styles submitted.
What else about the area, about the South Mountain Village Plan, have they not studied to
better build here?

Summary
This plan is not appropriate, and this builder is not appropriate for the unique character of the
area.
Please vote no on both cases.

Sincerely,




Page 520
Jewel Clark
2020 West South Mountain Ave.
Phoenix, AZ 85041

--
H. Jewel Clark
hjewelclark@fastmail.com




Page 521
From: JoAnne Jensen
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8 - Andora - Opposition
Date: Monday, December 13, 2021 7:43:57 PM


Hello -

I am writing to oppose the requests to modify the general plan and rezone the parcel in question for
the development of tract housing.

In the first place, outreach by developers is required, but there has only been a single meeting - last
week - for neighbors to hear the proposal. In most cases, at the very least, more time would be
needed for further discussions; however, this developer made it very clear that they are not
interested in engaging in any discussion that does not include changing the density to R1-10 zoning.
In fact, the developer reported that the land is being held in escrow, and that they would walk away
from the deal if the parcel is not approved for R1-10 zoning. This is the attitude of a public company,
whose headquarters is many states away, and which does not have any particular interest in
providing value for the South Mountain neighborhood. When asked, they could not identify one
feature which they would bring value to this area.

In the second place, the developer did agree to review their site plan, given that their proposal is
very nearly identical to the one which was rejected by the South Mountain Village Planning
Committee several years ago. However, again, this will be the proverbial finger puzzle exercise
rather than engaging in honest dialog aimed toward identifying a compromise reasonable for both
the neighbors and the developer.

In the third place, inasmuch as the developer has stated firmly that there is no way they will
entertain density less than 3.5 units / acre, problems with congestion, traffic safety, and noise will
abound.

In the fourth place, their plan for the expansion of South Mountain, on the northern boundary of
Andora, is physically impossible to achieve - given that there would be a sidewalk, an all use bridle
path, and an additional lane installed.

In sum, they know the current zoning, and are willing to ask the City to change it. Why are their
interests any more important than the interests of those of us who have already made the
investment of money and time, and who make this community unique? We all chose to become
part of South Mountain because we were told, promised, that farm property which would become
housing would be rezoned to R1-18 so we could retain as much a rural and unusual flavor as possible
- is that promise unreliable?

Please add me to the list of many neighbors who request that the South Mountain Village Planning
Committee reject this proposal.

Thank you.




Page 522
JoAnne Jensen
8303 S.17th Drive (Magdalena Estates)
Phoenix AZ 85041
480-213-6499




Page 523
Racelle Escolar

From: Dean Chiarelli
Sent: Monday, January 3, 2022 5:24 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: SMVPC Meeting January 6th - Opposition Notice



To South Mountain Village Planning Committee:

Re: Meeting Thursday, January 6th

I am strongly opposed to the items indicated below and request to speak.

Case numbers GPA‐SM‐3‐21‐8 and Z‐58‐21‐8 (Agenda items 2 and 3).
Case numbers GPA‐SM‐2‐21‐8 and Z‐31‐21‐8 (Agenda items 8 and 9).

I am opposed to the items because of excessive congestion on surface roads. The SMVPC is authorizing
excessive approvals of rezoning in the area in tandem with a lack of new cultural amenities/ businesses to
enhance quality of life in the area. The rural character of the area is rapidly changing for the worst, and this is
against the City of Phoenix planning codes and Food Plan for South Phoenix. I respectfully request an updated
traffic study which includes activity for homes currently under construction in the Dobbins Corridor. There are
new homes along Dobbins Road from 16th Street all the way to the Loop 202 which aren't even built yet that
will increase the congestion.

I also want to express concern the Chair of the Committee stated in the December 2021 meeting that she is a
Realtor who grew up in South Phoenix. There is an appearance of bias towards approval of higher‐density
residential zoning for which the Chair may personally benefit.

Dean Chiarelli, MA, RDN, CEP, CHES, REHS
Clinical Assistant Professor



500 North 3rd Street | Phoenix, AZ 85004
Ph: 602.496.1867 | dean.chiarelli@asu.edu
https://nursingandhealth.asu.ed [nursingandhealth.asu.edu]




Page1 524
Racelle Escolar

From: Erin Hegedus
Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 5:44 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 8 PCC; Adriana Garcia Maximiliano
Subject: Z-58-21-8 and GPA-SM-3-21-8



I am writing to oppose the referenced requests. The developer is asking to modify current zoning without regard to the
impact of the neighborhood.

The impact of this zoning modification is extremely harmful to the character and safety of this community.

The infrastructure does not support this nor several of developments under consideration. The roads are already
congested and dangerous. There are also concern to the heat island this and others will cause.

There are many neighborhoods in the South Phoenix area that this developer can utilize that will not fundamentally
change and disrupt the character of this unique community.

Regards,

Erin Hegedus, CMRP
8630 South 19th Avenue
Phoenix, AZ 85041

Sent from Mail [go.microsoft.com] for Windows




Page1 525
Racelle Escolar

From: H. Jewel Clark
Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 6:08 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Letter of opposition GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8



I am writing in opposition to GPA‐SM‐3‐21‐8 and Z‐58‐21‐8 (Agenda items 2 and 3) as currently submitted and approve
of the continuance voted on at the Dec. 14 SMVPC.

I am disappointed to say K. Hovnanian has shown zero interest in working with the neighborhood to try and reach any
compromise on our core opposition of density. We have yet to see if they will work with us on additional heat mitigation
and better housing design. Their stance has so far been, "This is what we do." We are working with the Vice Mayor to try
and find some middle ground and will hopefully see some movement before the next SMVPC meeting.
Sincerely,
Jewel Clark
2020 W. South Mountain Ave.
Phoenix, AZ 85041
‐‐
H. Jewel Clark
hjewelclark@fastmail.com




Page1 526
Racelle Escolar

From: JoAnne Jensen
Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 5:18 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Adriana Garcia Maximiliano; Council District 8 PCC
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8 / Andora



Hello and thank you for taking my comments.

My name is JoAnne Jensen, our address is 8303 So. 17th Drive, Phoenix AZ 85041; this is in Magdalena Estates, which is
on the northeast corner of the intersection of 19th Avenue and South Mountain, at a diagonal to the parcel under
consideration in the two requests named above.

These two requests appear on your agenda under Continuances and Withdrawals. I would absolutely support either
action regarding both requests. The current proposal is unacceptable to the neighbors, who have offered constructive
criticism and suggestions for the developer’s consideration; however, a continuation would support potential further
discussions between the developers and the neighbors – following two face to face meetings.

I am also signing up to speak on this issue, and would yield my time to Zach Brooks.

Again thank you.

JoAnne Jensen
Cell – 480‐213‐6499
Email – joannejensen@cox.net




Page1 527
Racelle Escolar

From: Mike Josic
Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 6:09 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8



Dear Planning Commision Members,

I oppose both agenda items GPA‐SM‐3‐21‐8 and Z‐58‐21‐8 and support a continuation to allow for further discussion
between the developer and the neighborhood. My property is directly across the street from this site.

Thank you,

Mike Josic
2020 W. South Mountain Ave
Phoenix AZ 85041




Page1 528
From: Steven & Rebekah Higginbotham
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola; Council District 8 PCC
Subject: I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8)
Date: Monday, January 10, 2022 9:50:27 AM


Hi Enrique,

I'm sorry for the delay, I think I missed the deadline but am sending in case it's not too late...


I live near 19th Avenue and South Mountain. I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-
58-21-8, aka the Andora project) and want to donate my speaking time to Zach Brooks.

I would like to request time on the SMVPC agenda for January 11 and to then yield that time
to Zach Brooks.

Best,
Rebekah




Page 529
Racelle Escolar

From: Steven & Rebekah Higginbotham
Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 4:14 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 8 PCC; adriana.garcia.maximilliano@phoenix.gov
Subject: I support continuance for cases GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8



I live near 19th Avenue and South Mountain and I support continuance for cases GPA‐SM‐3‐21‐8 and Z‐58‐21‐8, while
opposing the development itself (aka the Andora project) on the following grounds: the currently submitted stipulations
are inadequate for the safety and quality of life of this community.

I would like to request time on the Planning Commission agenda for Thursday, January 6 and to then yield that time to
Zach Brooks.

Best,
Rebekah




Page1 530
Racelle Escolar

From: Ravi Sharma
Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 5:03 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Council District 8 PCC; adriana.garcia.maximilliano@phoenix.gov
Subject: Item # 2 and Case # GPA-SM-3-21-8, Item #3 and Case # Z-58-21-8, Item # 8 and Case #GPA-SM-2-21-8
(Continued from 12/2/2021), Item # 9 and Case #



Z‐31‐21‐8 (Continued from 12/2/2021)


We are opposed to the proposed changes.

Dr. Ravi and Mrs. Snigdha Sharma




Page1 531
Racelle Escolar

From: Steven Higginbotham
Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 4:14 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 8 PCC; adriana.garcia.maximilliano@phoenix.gov
Subject: I support continuance for cases GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8



I live near 19th Avenue and South Mountain and I support continuance for cases GPA‐SM‐3‐21‐8 and Z‐58‐21‐8, while
opposing the development itself (aka the Andora project) on the following grounds: the currently submitted stipulations
are inadequate for the safety and quality of life of this community.

I would like to request time on the Planning Commission agenda for Thursday, January 6 and to then yield that time to
Zach Brooks.


‐‐
Steven Higginbotham




Page1 532
From: Dean Chiarelli
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: SMVPC Meeting January 11th
Date: Friday, January 7, 2022 4:15:59 PM
Attachments: Outlook-5rax1jrd.png
Outlook-m4mhurz5.png


Re: GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8)
I oppose both cases and request to speak about both items.
I have been a homeowner and resident in South Phoenix for 10 years. I oppose the amendment to
the General Plan Land Use and Rezoning. Andora is a generic housing development that will
produce higher-density problems (traffic, congestion, reduced emergency vehicle access on one-
lane roads). It will reduce the availability of premium land with a high potential for use in
agricultural business such as “agritainment”. It will increase heat, thereby impacting an
environmentally-sensitive area used for farming.
Approving Andora confounds the PlanPHX (2015), which promotes land use for healthy & grocery
stores, urban farms, community gardens, and agricultural businesses such as the Farm at South
Mountain. Harm will occur to codes and ordinances that eliminate barriers towards developing a
healthy food infrastructure.
Furthermore, citing the 2025 Food Action Plan, I strongly oppose amending and rezoning prime land
currently well-suited for an “agritainment” zoning district that permits uses and accessory uses for
primary agricultural use. The Grandma's Farm™, and the Farm at South Mountain™ are great
examples of the type of enterprises I advocate for. The SMVPC should prioritize & value prime land
as best used for development such as the AZ Fresh Food and Innovation Hub in the Rio Salado area.
During the last meeting, I asked a general question to all Planning Committee.
“How will you know how much amending and rezoning is too much”?
I am Pro-Development. I firmly believe the right developer(s) will be able to profit without the need
to amend and rezone this land in a way that will inevitably reduce the quality of life for existing
residents.
The Village Planning Committee handbook, on pages 6 -8, identifies some key points to consider for
land use map amendments and rezoning.
Is there a conflict between the proposed land use and physical constraints or the environmental
sensitivity of the area?
Yes, the issue is well-documented with increased traffic, increased heat, flooding problems, and
reduced capacity for emergency vehicles restricted by one-lane roads (19th Avenue and Dobbins
Road).   The impact of emergency vehicles should not be under-estimated. The project has only one
entry.

How does the proposed change affect the underlying character of the area?
Yes, there is a demonstrated negative impact to access the 19th Avenue Trail in South Mountain park
because of increased congestion, traffic, reduced views, loss of space in the surrounding areas.

Does the proposed land use have any positive or negative impacts on goals and policies within the
general plan?
Yes, there is a negative impact because it reduces the capacity to carry out the portions of PlanPHX
(2015) and the 2025 Food Action Plan.
The opportunity cost for this land is too high. The SMVPC has approved an excessive amount of
amending & rezoning for increased residential density, and at the same time, an absence of exciting
& appealing businesses which embody the unique character and rural appeal. Phoenix is poised to
be an agricultural hub and food innovation center. The South Mountain Village (District 8) is ideally


Page 533
suited to be part of this longer-term infrastructure. These case items have many oppositions from
the community and should NOT be approved.
Sincerely,

Dean Chiarelli


Dean Chiarelli, MA, RDN, CEP, CHES, REHS
Clinical Assistant Professor



500 North 3rd Street | Phoenix, AZ 85004
Ph: 602.496.1867 | dean.chiarelli@asu.edu
https://nursingandhealth.asu.ed [nursingandhealth.asu.edu]









Page 534
From: H. Jewel Clark
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: Opposition to GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8 (agenda items 8 and 9)
Date: Friday, January 7, 2022 4:51:56 PM


I am writing to oppose applicant case numbers GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8 (agenda items
8 and 9).

I am sorry to report that since the last SMVPC meeting, the applicant, K Hovnanian, has been
unwilling to work with the neighborhood on any changes to this project, specifically in regards
to density, which is entirely inappropriate for our area. While the Kimura development
approved across the street, sadly, is also entirely inappropriate for our area, the developer has
nevertheless worked to reduce that density and we are in continuing negotiations to work out
additional heat mitigation and sustainable/green building for the site.

This developer is just Scott Ward all over again, who we opposed at this location in 2018 with
the same density and the same unwillingness to do anything to accommodate the existing
neighbors. K Hovanian's attitude is, just like Scott Ward's was, "Trust me, you'll love it." Mr.
Chisolm, to his credit, has been completely open about not budging. He represents a national
home builder and they have their way of doing things. The message we are getting is: our only
tool a hammer, so all our builds need to be nails. No deviation.

This is not what our area is about. We are a diverse, unique mix of custom homes, active
farmland, horse properties and R1-18 small developments. Any developer who wants to build
in our area should work with existing neighbors to craft a design and density that is "livable"
for those who already live there. If development has to happen, we support a density at R1-18,
particularly since it borders 2 active farming properties. The current plan, with the entrance
back on W. South Mountain Ave., and the density and cookie-cutter lots proposed are
anathema for us.

Please do not approve either the GPA or the zoning request. Thank you.
Jewel Clark
2020 W. South Mountain Ave.
Phoenix, AZ

--
H. Jewel Clark
hjewelclark@fastmail.com




Page 535
From: Bryan Martin
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Cc: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: Meeting time deferral GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8).
Date: Sunday, January 9, 2022 5:29:51 PM




> Hello
>
> I appose GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8) and want to donate my speaking time to Zach Brooks.
>
> Warm thanks
> Bryan Martin
> 602-909-0948
>
> **** Please hold me harmless against any and all opinions that were presented here as facts. However shocking
they may seem, just know that they are fueled by excitement and shared with love. Warm thanks in advance. ****




Page 536
From: donatus agbakwu
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: Objection
Date: Monday, January 10, 2022 5:27:11 PM


Hello Enrique
This is to inform that I oppose applicant case numbers GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8 (agenda items
8 and 9). The applicant, K Hovnanian, has been unwilling to work with the neighborhood on any
changes to this project, specifically in regards to density, which is entirely inappropriate for our area.
Regards
Donarus Agbakwu
Magdelena Estate




Page 537
From: Dorothy Hallock
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: Opposition to GPA-SM-3-21 and Z-58-22-8 KHovnanian Andora
Date: Sunday, January 9, 2022 11:54:23 AM




I am opposed to a General Plan Amendment and Rezoning for the above project.
Please give my speaking time to Zach Brooks at the SMVPC meeting.
Thank you
Dorothy Hallock

Sent from my iPhone




Page 538
From: Erin Hegedus
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8
Date: Monday, January 10, 2022 1:12:40 PM




I am writing to oppose this request for rezoning.
The same design was presented four years ago and this committee rejected the request. This developer is basically
submitting the same plan.
The design is not consistent with the neighborhood. Adds no value to the neighbors and consequently is adding
more traffic than the roadways can handle, addititionally, more noise and heat.
The bus stop that was added is a negation as currently there is not s bus route and this will add even more noise and
traffic.
Please be aware that this developer does not own this property so he technically has no rights.
Please also note that we have offered many suggestions to make this development palatable to the neighbors but
every idea we have suggested has been ignored.

Sent from my iPhone




Page 539
From: JoAnne Jensen
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: GPA-SM-3-32-8 and companion case Z-58-21-8 / Opposition Comments
Date: Monday, January 10, 2022 11:12:34 AM


Hello and good morning -

Please forward my opposition comments with respect to the cases cited above to the South
Mountain Village Planning Committee ahead of their meeting tomorrow evening.

Our neighborhood group has met twice with the developer, who has been consistent in not
accommodating or directly responding to our concerns. We do not oppose residential development,
however, we do believe that maintaining the rural / agricultural / equestrian nature of this part of
Phoenix demands the lower density of R1-18 zoning.

Beyond that, the streets in question - 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue - are largely
unimproved and are woefully inadequate to safely handle the current amount of traffic much less
cars from a densely populated development. There have been collisions, including a fatality, at the
uncontrolled intersection of these two streets.

Please vote to oppose the developer's plan which offers no benefit or improvement to this
community.

Thank you.

JoAnne Jensen
8303 S. 17th Drive
Phoenix AZ   85041
480-213-6499




Page 540
From: Leticia Rivera
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8
Date: Sunday, January 9, 2022 5:07:41 PM


Hello Mr. Bojórquez-Gaxiola,

I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8) and want to donate my speaking time
to Zach Brooks.

Leticia Rivera
1716 W. Magdalena Ln
Phoenix, AZ 85041




Page 541
From: Miguel Rubio
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8
Date: Monday, January 10, 2022 1:57:14 PM


I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 (CAMPANION CASE Z-58-21-8) and want to donate my speaking time to
Zach Brooks.

MIGUEL RUBIO

RB CONTRACTING LLC
8020 S 2OTH AVE
PHX,AZ 85041
(602) 366 9334




Page 542
From: Mike Josic
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Cc: Mike Josic
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Companion Case Z-58-21-8 Opposition
Date: Sunday, January 9, 2022 7:55:44 PM


Hi Enrigue,
Please register my opposition and speaking time.
I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Companion Case Z-58-21-8 and want to donate my
speaking time to Zach Brooks.

Thank you,

Mike Josic




Page 543
From: Norberto
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: Fw: City of Phoenix - Update on case GPA-SM-3-21-8
Date: Sunday, January 9, 2022 6:52:35 PM


I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8) and want to donate my speaking time
to Zach Brooks"
Thank you

Norberto Rivera
1716 w Magdalena ln
Phx 85041




Page 544
From: Ravi Sharma
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Cc: Ravi Sharma; zach@zbrooks.com
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8)
Date: Sunday, January 9, 2022 5:15:52 PM


I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8) and want to donate my speaking
time to Zach Brooks.

Thanks,


Ravi Sharma




Page 545
From: Snigdha Sharma
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Cc: Ushma-email; zach@zbrooks.com
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8)
Date: Sunday, January 9, 2022 5:08:01 PM


I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8) and want to donate my speaking time
to Zach Brooks

Thanks,

Mrs. Snigdha Sharma




Page 546
From: stephanie rubio
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8
Date: Monday, January 10, 2022 1:18:42 PM




I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8) and want to donate my speaking time to
Zach Brooks.


Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device




Page 547
From: Steven Higginbotham
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola; Council District 8 PCC
Subject: I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8)
Date: Monday, January 10, 2022 9:49:52 AM


I live near 19th Avenue and South Mountain. I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-
58-21-8, aka the Andora project) and want to donate my speaking time to Zach Brooks.

I would like to request time on the SMVPC agenda for January 11 and to then yield that time
to Zach Brooks.


--
Steven Higginbotham




Page 548
From: Dean Chiarelli
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: Andora revised site plan submitted January 10th, 2022
Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 11:36:58 AM



I am Dean Chiarelli and my address is 912 East La Mirada Drive, Phoenix AZ 85042.

I agree with the statement submitted by Jewel Clark regarding the updated Andora site plan
submitted on January 10th, 2022. I advocate for the SMVPC to NOT approve an amendment
to map and rezoning the area. The right developer will be able to make a profit without the
need to amend the GPA and rezone. There is already a large and excessive amount of higher-
density residential development under construction in the area right now.

Ms. Clark's rebuttal is cut and pasted below:
____________________________________________________________________

"After receiving the updated site plan submitted 1/10/22 I feel compelled to write a rebuttal
and update from my original letter.

This plan appears to be an attempt to comply with SMVPC member requests and create the
appearance of "working with the neighbors" and attempted the meagerest of reductions
based on hearing the Vice Mayor say he wouldn't support 66 houses at our last meeting. The
neighbors do not want a higher density development smack in the middle of S-1 acre+ lots
with custom homes, active farmland, and horse properties.

While Mr. Gilbert may argue that K Hovnanian has now come down to the same density (in
fact they've just copied the Kimura specs) the neighbors negotiated with John Poulsen across
the street for the Kimura development, no one in the neighborhood wanted the density that
was approved. We lacked any additional leverage to force the number lower and so agreed to
the final density offer in exchange for other accommodations like the deep setback, and heat
mitigation that we are still in negotiations on.

The neighborhood, as a body, wants lower density to prevail in our area because that is what
we bought into this area for, and what the Rio Montana and 2015 General Plans dictate to
preserve our rural character and certainty, and when we have the ability to hold a developer
accountable to that lower density, we are prepared to use it, as we are here.

The property is zoned S-1. There is an R1-18 overlay that the developer could take advantage
of to build to the density that the neighborhood would accept, along with other aspects like
heat mitigation and building practices that would help keep our area cooler and more in line
with the current rural character. As committee member Busching said at the December
meeting, "There is no right to rezone." These particular cases are an excellent example with



Page 549
which to practice this truth. There is nothing compelling in this site plan to warrant approving
this GPA or rezoning request. There is no neighborhood support. Please vote no on both
cases.

As an aside, I would like to address Dr. Brooks' eloquent words from the December meeting
about a "growing inequity" between the developers and the neighborhoods who come before
you. I very much appreciated hearing that and also hearing many other committee members
support his statement. I would only differ in my agreement by saying the inequity is not
growing but it is here. The virtual meetings, while convenient and we can agree necessary in
these times, make it impossible for you to see the full quantity of opposed neighbors. A room
full of people makes a certain impression that a list of attendees on Zoom can't. That and the
lack of time for the neighborhood to present compared to the developer's lawyers and the
lack of any rebuttal time for the neighborhood further stacks the deck in favor of the
developer. I don't know if you have the power to adopt a more equitable format without
turning the meeting into a 6 hour ordeal, but I do hope you can find a way".

Sincerely,
Jewel Clark
2020 West South Mountain Ave.
Phoenix, AZ 85041



--
H. Jewel Clark
hjewelclark@fastmail.com




Page 550
From: Dean Chiarelli
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: SMVPC Meeting Jan 11, 2022--- Abstain from vote
Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 2:58:06 PM


Re: GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8)
South Mountain Village Planning Committee [SMVPC]
Meeting January 11, 2022
I request that Ms. Daniels, SMVPC Chair, abstain from voting on the items. Ms. Daniels is a Realtor in
the South Mountain area, and her real-estate business activities give the appearance of a conflict of
interest. During prior meetings, Ms. Daniels declared herself a Realtor in South Phoenix, and
remarked publicly that perhaps she could sell some properties reviewed by the SMVPC. It is
unethical if she (or any other Planning Member) votes on an item they will benefit commercially and
financially. Within Ms. Daniels’ position of authority as Chair, she should exercise good judgment
and abstain from voting.
The Village Planning Handbook item 8., page 9, states that a committee member should refrain
from participating when a conflict of interest exists, and it includes language for a perceived conflict
of interest.




Source:
https://www.phoenix.gov/villagessite/Documents/pdd_pz_pdf_00020.pdf#search=village%20planning%20handbook
Accessed January 11, 2022

Furthermore, the City of Phoenix Ethics Handbook- Employees & Volunteers page 8 clearly defines
an example of conflict-of-interest for a Realtor Listing Agreement. The handbook states “If a board
member participated in consideration of the matter, the board member should not later enter the
listing agreement.”




Page 551
Source:https://www.phoenix.gov/citymanagersite/Documents/Ethics/Ethics_Handbook_Employee_Volunteers.pdf
Accessed: January 11, 2022

Ms. Daniel’s appearance of a conflict of interest is based on LinkedIn™ website data regarding The
Courtyards at Madison Ranch [Z-36-06], and Copper Leaf [Z-22-02]. Both were reviewed during Ms.
Daniels' appointment to the SMVPC. Upon approval, Ms. Daniels had the opportunity to benefit
commercially and financially as demonstrated below.




Page 552
Source: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tamala-l-daniels-pllc-b3372bb [linkedin.com]
Accessed January 7, 2022.

Ms. Daniels LinkedIn™ profile identifies her as “Exclusive Realtor” for The Courtyards at Madison
Ranch [Z-36-06].




Ms. Daniels' LinkedIn™ profile identifies her as “New Home Developer Consultant, New Home
Specialist” for Copper Leaf [Z-22-02].




Page 553
I perceive Ms. Daniels' residential real-estate activity as a conflict of interest. I verbally stated my
concern to Vice-Mayor Carlos Garcia during the community meeting on January 3rd, 2022. As Chair,
Ms. Daniels has authority to facilitate meetings and alter the agenda order. In December, 2021 I
observed her unfairly limit speaking time to various stakeholders, especially JoAnne Jensen who
represented a community group. Other meeting attendees expressed agreement and appreciate
this issue being brought to the table.
Village Planners function as volunteers, and I genuinely appreciate their devotion of time and energy
to fulfilling their roles. As volunteers, Planners have an ethical obligation not to appear to have an
actual or the appearance of a conflict of interest. I request that Ms. Daniels, and any other
Committee Member who is a realtor or otherwise has a commercial interest, abstain from voting
on GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8). There is a high-level of opposition which is well-
documented within the community.

I am Pro-Development, and my position on these items is that the SMVPC should OPPOSE. The right
builder will make a profit without the need to amend the map and rezone. This land is prime, and
the best use is as part of PlanPHX 2015 and South Phoenix Food Plan enterprises (related to
agricultural enterprise such as “agritainment”) or residential, which does not increase density. A
precedent is set by the City of Phoenix AZ Fresh™ initiative. I would like to see more businesses such
as Grandma's Farm™, The Farm at South Mountain™, Arizona Worm Farm™ contribute to the
unique, rich, historic location. Phoenix is poised to become a food innovation and agricultural hub.
Prime land is lost forever when GPA map is amended and rezoned for higher-density, generic
housing.
Dean Chiarelli




Page 554
From: Gina Baker
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: Fwd: Andora opposition letter to latest plan for anyone who wants to read/sign on.
Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 11:06:08 AM




Hi Enrique,

I’d like to add this as my written statement to the SMVP Committee regarding my opposition to the zoning change.

I agree wholeheartedly agree with the entire statement below.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> After receiving the updated site plan submitted 1/10/22 I feel compelled to to write a rebuttal and update from my
original letter.
>
> This plan appears to be an attempt to comply with SMVPC member requests and create the appearance of
"working with the neighbors" and attempted the meagerest of reductions based on hearing the Vice Mayor say he
wouldn't support 66 houses at our last meeting. The neighbors do not want a higher density development smack in
the middle of S-1 acre+ lots with custom homes, active farmland, and horse properties.
>
> While Mr. Gilbert may argue that K Hovnanian has now come down to the same density (in fact they've just
copied the Kimura specs) the neighbors negotiated with John Poulsen across the street for the Kimura development,
no one in the neighborhood wanted the density that was approved. We lacked any additional leverage to force the
number lower and so agreed to the final density offer in exchange for other accommodations like the deep setback,
and heat mitigation that we are still in negotiations on.
>
> The neighborhood, as a body, wants lower density to prevail in our area because that is what we bought into this
area for, and what the Rio Montana and 2015 General Plans dictate to preserve our rural character and certainty, and
when we have the ability to hold a developer accountable to that lower density, we are prepared to use it, as we are
here.
>
> The property is zoned S-1. There is an R1-18 overlay that the developer could take advantage of to build to the
density that the neighborhood would accept, along with other aspects like heat mitigation and building practices that
would help keep our area cooler and more in line with the current rural character. As committee member Busching
said at the December meeting, "There is no right to rezone." These particular cases are an excellent example with
which to practice this truth. There is nothing compelling in this site plan to warrant approving this GPA or rezoning
request. There is no neighborhood support. Please vote no on both cases.
>
> As an aside, I would like to address Dr. Brooks' eloquent words from the December meeting about a "growing
inequity" between the developers and the neighborhoods who come before you. I very much appreciated hearing
that and also hearing many other committee members support his statement. I would only differ in my agreement by
saying the inequity is not growing but it is here. The virtual meetings, while convenient and we can agree necessary
in these times, make it impossible for you to see the full quantity of opposed neighbors. A room full of people
makes a certain impression that a list of attendees on Zoom can't. That and the lack of time for the neighborhood to
present compared to the developer's lawyers and the lack of any rebuttal time for the neighborhood further stacks the
deck in favor of the developer. I don't know if you have the power to adopt a more equitable format without turning
the meeting into a 6 hour ordeal, but I do hope you can find a way.
>
> Sincerely,
> Jewel Clark
> 2020 West South Mountain Ave.
> Phoenix, Az

Gina Johnson



Page 555
1816 W Magdalena Ln
Phoenix, AZ 85041
Magdalena Estates
>
>




Page 556
From: H. Jewel Clark
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: Opposition to GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8 (agenda items 8 and 9) - latest plan
Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 10:01:53 AM


Hi Enrique,

After receiving the updated site plan submitted 1/10/22 I feel compelled to to write a rebuttal
and update from my original letter.

This plan appears to be an attempt to comply with SMVPC member requests and create the
appearance of "working with the neighbors" and attempted the meagerest of reductions based
on hearing the Vice Mayor say he wouldn't support 66 houses at our last meeting. The
neighbors do not want a higher density development smack in the middle of S-1 acre+ lots
with custom homes, active farmland, and horse properties.

While Mr. Gilbert may argue that K Hovnanian has now come down to the same density (in
fact they've just copied the Kimura specs) the neighbors negotiated with John Poulsen across
the street for the Kimura development, no one in the neighborhood wanted the density that
was approved. We lacked any additional leverage to force the number lower and so agreed to
the final density offer in exchange for other accommodations like the deep setback, and heat
mitigation that we are still in negotiations on.

The neighborhood, as a body, wants lower density to prevail in our area because that is what
we bought into this area for, and what the Rio Montana and 2015 General Plans dictate to
preserve our rural character and certainty, and when we have the ability to hold a developer
accountable to that lower density, we are prepared to use it, as we are here.

The property is zoned S-1. There is an R1-18 overlay that the developer could take advantage
of to build to the density that the neighborhood would accept, along with other aspects like
heat mitigation and building practices that would help keep our area cooler and more in line
with the current rural character. As committee member Busching said at the December
meeting, "There is no right to rezone." These particular cases are an excellent example with
which to practice this truth. There is nothing compelling in this site plan to warrant approving
this GPA or rezoning request. There is no neighborhood support. Please vote no on both cases.

As an aside, I would like to address Dr. Brooks' eloquent words from the December meeting
about a "growing inequity" between the developers and the neighborhoods who come before
you. I very much appreciated hearing that and also hearing many other committee members
support his statement. I would only differ in my agreement by saying the inequity is not
growing but it is here. The virtual meetings, while convenient and we can agree necessary in
these times, make it impossible for you to see the full quantity of opposed neighbors. A room
full of people makes a certain impression that a list of attendees on Zoom can't. That and the
lack of time for the neighborhood to present compared to the developer's lawyers and the lack
of any rebuttal time for the neighborhood further stacks the deck in favor of the developer. I
don't know if you have the power to adopt a more equitable format without turning the
meeting into a 6 hour ordeal, but I do hope you can find a way.

Sincerely,
Jewel Clark



Page 557
2020 West South Mountain Ave.
Phoenix, AZ 85041

--
H. Jewel Clark
hjewelclark@fastmail.com




Page 558
From: Leticia Rivera
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: I support the following statement
Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 10:58:26 AM




Mr Bojórquez-Gaxiola,

This statement was not written by me but am in support of the request it makes.

“This plan appears to be an attempt to comply with SMVPC member requests and create the appearance of
"working with the neighbors" and attempted the [most meager] of reductions based on hearing the Vice Mayor say
he wouldn't support 66 houses at our last meeting. The neighbors do not want a higher density development smack
in the middle of S-1 acre+ lots with custom homes, active farmland, and horse properties.

While Mr. Gilbert may argue that K Hovnanian has now come down to the same density (in fact they've just copied
the Kimura specs) the neighbors negotiated with John Poulsen across the street for the Kimura development, no one
in the neighborhood wanted the density that was approved. We lacked any additional leverage to force the number
lower and so agreed to the final density offer in exchange for other accommodations like the deep setback, and heat
mitigation that we are still in negotiations on.

The neighborhood, as a body, wants lower density to prevail in our area because that is what we bought into this
area for, and what the Rio Montana and 2015 General Plans dictate to preserve our rural character and certainty, and
when we have the ability to hold a developer accountable to that lower density, we are prepared to use it, as we are
here.

The property is zoned S-1. There is an R1-18 overlay that the developer could take advantage of to build to the
density that the neighborhood would accept, along with other aspects like heat mitigation and building practices that
would help keep our area cooler and more in line with the current rural character. As committee member Busching
said at the December meeting, "There is no right to rezone." These particular cases are an excellent example with
which to practice this truth. There is nothing compelling in this site plan to warrant approving this GPA or rezoning
request. There is no neighborhood support. Please vote no on both cases.

As an aside, I would like to address Dr. Brooks' eloquent words from the December meeting about a "growing
inequity" between the developers and the neighborhoods who come before you. I very much appreciated hearing
that and also hearing many other committee members support his statement. I would only differ in my agreement by
saying the inequity is not growing but it is here. The virtual meetings, while convenient and we can agree necessary
in these times, make it impossible for you to see the full quantity of opposed neighbors. A room full of people
makes a certain impression that a list of attendees on Zoom can't. That and the lack of time for the neighborhood to
present compared to the developer's lawyers and the lack of any rebuttal time for the neighborhood further stacks the
deck in favor of the developer. I don't know if you have the power to adopt a more equitable format without turning
the meeting into a 6 hour ordeal, but I do hope you can find a way. “

Leticia Rivera
1716 W. Magdalena Ln
Phoenix 85041




Page 559
From: Ravi Sharma
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Cc: Ravi Sharma
Subject: City of Phoenix - Update on case GPA-SM-3-21-8
Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 1:59:12 PM


Hello Mr. Bojorques-gaxiola,

Upon reviewing the updated plan submitted 1/10/2022, my wife and I oppose the latest plans
offered by the developer.
The neighborhood, as a body, wants lower density to prevail in our area because that is what
we bought into this area for, and what the Rio Montana and 2015 General Plans dictate to
preserve our rural character and certainty, and when we have the ability to hold a developer
accountable to that lower density, we are prepared to use it, as we are here.
The property is zoned S-1. There is an R1-18 overlay that the developer could take advantage
of to build to the density that the neighborhood would accept, along with other aspects like
heat mitigation and building practices that would help keep our area cooler and more in line
with the current rural character. As committee member Busching said at the December
meeting, "There is no right to rezone." These particular cases are an excellent example with
which to practice this truth. There is nothing compelling in this site plan to warrant approving
this GPA or rezoning request. There is no neighborhood support. Please vote no on both cases.

As an aside, I would like to address Dr. Brooks' eloquent words from the December meeting
about a "growing inequity" between the developers and the neighborhoods who come before
you. I very much appreciated hearing that and also hearing many other committee members
support his statement. I would only differ in my agreement by saying the inequity is not
growing but it is here. The virtual meetings, while convenient and we can agree are necessary
in these times, make it impossible for you to see the full quantity of opposed neighbors. A
room full of people makes a certain impression that a list of attendees on Zoom can't. That and
the lack of time for the neighborhood to present compared to the developer's lawyers and the
lack of any rebuttal time for the neighborhood further stacks the deck in favor of the
developer. I don't know if you have the power to adopt a more equitable format without
turning the meeting into a 6 hour ordeal, but I do hope you can find a way.

My wife and I support the above statements.

Dr. Ravi and Snigdha Sharma
8012 S. 20th. Avenue
Phoenix, AZ85041




Page 560
From: Rob Barnes
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: FW: Opposition to development
Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 10:57:45 AM




Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone



-------- Original message --------
From: Rob Barnes
Date: 1/11/22 10:54 AM (GMT-07:00)
To: enrique.bojorquezgaxiola@phoenix.gov
Subject: Opposition to development


I agree with the following statement from H.Jewel Clark, additionally I would like to yield my
speaking time to Zach Brooks.

Respectfully,
Robert Barnes
Magdalena Estates
8312 S 18th Ln
Phoenix AZ 85041

-----------------------------------------------------

After receiving the updated site plan submitted 1/10/22 I feel compelled to to write a rebuttal
and update from my original letter.

This plan appears to be an attempt to comply with SMVPC member requests and create the
appearance of "working with the neighbors" and attempted the meagerest of reductions based
on hearing the Vice Mayor say he wouldn't support 66 houses at our last meeting. The
neighbors do not want a higher density development smack in the middle of S-1 acre+ lots
with custom homes, active farmland, and horse properties.

While Mr. Gilbert may argue that K Hovnanian has now come down to the same density (in
fact they've just copied the Kimura specs) the neighbors negotiated with John Poulsen across
the street for the Kimura development, no one in the neighborhood wanted the density that
was approved. We lacked any additional leverage to force the number lower and so agreed to
the final density offer in exchange for other accommodations like the deep setback, and heat
mitigation that we are still in negotiations on.

The neighborhood, as a body, wants lower density to prevail in our area because that is what
we bought into this area for, and what the Rio Montana and 2015 General Plans dictate to
preserve our rural character and certainty, and when we have the ability to hold a developer
accountable to that lower density, we are prepared to use it, as we are here.



Page 561
The property is zoned S-1. There is an R1-18 overlay that the developer could take advantage
of to build to the density that the neighborhood would accept, along with other aspects like
heat mitigation and building practices that would help keep our area cooler and more in line
with the current rural character. As committee member Busching said at the December
meeting, "There is no right to rezone." These particular cases are an excellent example with
which to practice this truth. There is nothing compelling in this site plan to warrant approving
this GPA or rezoning request. There is no neighborhood support. Please vote no on both cases.

As an aside, I would like to address Dr. Brooks' eloquent words from the December meeting
about a "growing inequity" between the developers and the neighborhoods who come before
you. I very much appreciated hearing that and also hearing many other committee members
support his statement. I would only differ in my agreement by saying the inequity is not
growing but it is here. The virtual meetings, while convenient and we can agree necessary in
these times, make it impossible for you to see the full quantity of opposed neighbors. A room
full of people makes a certain impression that a list of attendees on Zoom can't. That and the
lack of time for the neighborhood to present compared to the developer's lawyers and the lack
of any rebuttal time for the neighborhood further stacks the deck in favor of the developer. I
don't know if you have the power to adopt a more equitable format without turning the
meeting into a 6 hour ordeal, but I do hope you can find a way.




Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone




Page 562
Page 563
Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola

To: Erin Hegedus
Subject: RE: Rezoning request for 19th Avenue & Southern



For Z‐31‐21‐8 and GPA‐SM‐2‐21‐8, and Z‐58‐21‐8 and GPA‐SM‐3‐21‐8 case files.

From: Erin Hegedus
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 5:10 PM
To: info@TechnicalSolutionsAZ.com; Council District 8 PCC
Subject: Rezoning request for 19th Avenue & Southern

I reside at 8630 South 19th Avenue and am very concerned with the request to rezone this property.
Myself and our neighbors have aggressively contested this previously and continue to do so.

My concerns, to list a few are:

Infrastructure does not support an increase in density.

o South Mountain Avenue is at best a two lane road from 7th Street to 27th Avenue. There
are several areas of this road that are only one lane and the road is continually backed
up especially when school is in session.
o 19th Avenue is also a two lane road with open canals to the east and the west and
cannot support the current traffic and has been subject to several fatalities in the last 3
years.
o Additionally, Dobbins Road is a two lane road from 20th Street to 43rd Avenue and has
been heavily backed up for years.

There are many developments on Dobbins Road that are in process that are going to affect all of us that
reside in the area.

Furthermore, the housing that is proposed is not compliant with the homes that are in the area, which
are larger lots, higher value and conform to the current Rio Montana plan that was approved by the City
Council.

I am not only concerned with the lack of infrastructure but the fact that the higher density homes will
greatly devalue our homes that conform to the current zoning.

I ask that you review the plans and decrease the density to conform to the Rio Montana plan as we have
requested previously.

Sincerely,
Erin Hegedus, CMRP




Sent from Mail [go.microsoft.com] for Windows



Page 564



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing and Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-58-21-8 -
Southwest Corner of 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue (Ordinance G-
6972)

Request to hold a public hearing and amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section
601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-58-21-
8 and rezone the site from S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence District), approved R1-18
(Single-Family Residence District) to R1-10 (Single-Family Residence District) to allow
detached single-family residential. This file is a companion case and must be heard
following GPA-SM-3-21-8.

Summary
Current Zoning: S-1 (Approved R1-18)
Proposed Zoning: R1-10
Acreage: 20.76 acres
Proposed Use: Detached single-family residential

Owner: PW Again, LLC
Applicant: Paul Gilbert, Beus Gilbert McGroder, PLLC
Representative: Paul Gilbert, Beus Gilbert McGroder, PLLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The South Mountain Village Planning Committee heard the case on Dec.
14, 2021, and recommended a continuance by a vote of 11-0. The South Mountain
Village Planning Committee heard the case again on Jan. 11, 2022, and
recommended denial by a vote of 9-4-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard the case on Jan. 6, 2022, and
recommend a continuance, by a vote of 8-0. The Planning Commission heard the case
again on Feb. 3, 2022, and recommended approval, per the Addendum C staff report,
by a vote of 6-2.

Location
Southwest corner of 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue.
Council District: 8
Parcel Addresses: 8410, 8420 S. 19th Ave. and 2075 W. South Mountain Ave.


Page 565


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 566
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-58-21-8) FROM S-1 (RANCH OR FARM
RESIDENCE DISTRICT), APPROVED R1-18 (SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT) TO R1-10 (SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 20.76-acre site located at the southwest

corner of 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue in a portion of Section 1, Township

1 South, Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed

from “S-1” (Ranch or Farm Residence District), approved “R1-18” (Single-Family

Residence District), to “R1-10” (Single-Family Residence District).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”




Page 567
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date
stamped February 2, 2022, as modified by the following stipulations and
approved by the Planning and Development Department with specific regard to
the following:

a. The development shall be limited to a maximum of 52 lots.


b. All lots shall be a minimum of 75 feet in width.


c. Lots shall be a minimum of 45 feet from the southern perimeter property
line.

d. Lots shall be a minimum of 50 feet from the western perimeter property
line.

e. A minimum 10-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along the
southern and western perimeter of the site.

f. The location of the open space areas.


g. A minimum of 17 percent of the gross site area, exclusive of required
landscape setbacks, shall be provided as open space.

h. A minimum building setback of 50 feet, exclusive of fencing, entry
features or detached accessory structures, shall be provided along the
northern and eastern perimeter of the site along 19th Avenue and South
Mountain Avenue.

i. A minimum 25-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along 19th
Avenue and South Mountain Avenue. The landscape setback may be
reduced to 20 feet for up to 50 percent of this frontage for the purpose of
staggering the perimeter theme wall.

j. Full ingress and egress to the development shall be limited to 19th
Avenue.



Page 568
2. All landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 50 percent 2-inch caliper
and 50 percent 3-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on
center or in equivalent groupings, with five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

3. The maximum building height shall be limited to one story and 22 feet.

4. All lots in the development shall be subject to Single-Family Design Review,
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

5. Building elevations shall be developed to the following standards, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department:

a. Building elevations shall contain multiple colors, exterior accent materials
and textural changes that exhibit quality and durability such as brick,
stone, colored textured concrete or stucco, or other materials to provide
a decorative and aesthetic treatment.

b. A minimum of 50 percent of the elevations for each floor plan shall
provide a covered front porch in the front yard with a minimum of 60
square feet in area at a depth of at least six feet. No porch shall
terminate within the plane of a door or window.

c. Pitched roofs shall be provided on all primary building elevations.

6. Fences and walls shall be in general conformance with the site wall elevations
date stamped January 11, 2022 and site wall plan date stamped February 2,
2022, as modified by the following stipulations, and approved by the Planning
and Development Department:

a. Full open view fencing, which may include solid columns up to 24 inches
in width, shall be utilized where walls are proposed around open space
areas adjacent to a perimeter public street.

b. The wall layout depicted in the wall plan shall be modified where
necessary to accommodate site layout changes that avoid conflicts with
the Zoning Ordinance or City Code requirements.

c. Perimeter walls bounding the rear yard property lines of residential lots
along 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue shall include minimum
three-foot offsets and material and textural differences, such as stucco,
and/or split face or slump block or a decorative element, such as tile or
stamped designs, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.




Page 569
7. Project entry/exit drives along 19th Avenue shall incorporate decorative pavers,
stamped or colored concrete, or similar alternative material, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

8. Project entry/exit drives along 19th Avenue shall incorporate enhanced
landscaping on both sides planted with a variety of at least three plant
materials, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. Each
landscaped area shall be a minimum of 250-square feet.

9. A system of pedestrian connections shall be provided, to connect the following
as described below and as approved by the Planning and Development
Department:

a. Amenity areas.

b. Sidewalks.

c. Pedestrian path connecting the primary amenity area with the southern
and western portions of the site via a centralized pathway.

d. The common open space tract along the southwest corner of 19th
Avenue and South Mountain Avenue shall contain a minimum 8-foot-
wide pedestrian pathway that connects the development with the
sidewalk at 19th Avenue or South Mountain Avenue near the street
intersection. This pathway shall be constructed of decomposed stabilized
granite, decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or similar
alternative material. The landscaped tract shall contain minimum 2-inch
caliper shade trees planted a minimum of 25 feet on center or equivalent
groupings, along both sides of the pedestrian pathway.

e. Pedestrian access shall be provided along vehicular access points to the
development. The pedestrian access shall be connected to the internal
pedestrian pathways by accessible sidewalks.

10. No more than 50 percent of the landscape areas within common areas or 10
percent of the net development area whichever is less, should be planted in turf
or high-water use plants. Turf areas should be located only in the common
open space areas, including retention basins, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. This requirement does not apply to landscaping
located within private yards on individual lots.

11. The following shall be provided in the central amenity area and/or dispersed
throughout the development, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department:

a. Tot lot with shade equipment;




Page 570
b. One picnic area with a barbeque grill, shade ramada and a picnic table;
and

c. Two benches or seating features.

12. The sidewalk along 19th Avenue shall be a minimum of five feet in width and
detached with a minimum 13-foot-wide landscape strip located between the
sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following standards, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant shade
trees planted 25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings that provide
shade to a minimum 75 percent at maturity.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at
maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

13. All sidewalks along South Mountain Avenue shall be detached with a minimum
five-foot wide landscape strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb
and planted to the following standards, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant shade
trees planted 25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings that provide
shade to a minimum 75 percent at maturity.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at
maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

14. The developer shall dedicate 50 feet of right-of-way and construct the west half
of 19th Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

15. The developer shall provide conduit and junction boxes at 19th Avenue and
South Mountain Avenue for future traffic signal equipment on the southwest
corner of the intersection. All work related to the construction or reconstruction
of the conduit runs and junction box installation shall be the responsibility of the
Developer.




Page 571
16. Existing irrigation facilities along 19th Avenue are to be undergrounded and
relocated outside of City of Phoenix right-of-way. Contact SRP to identify
existing land rights and establish appropriate process to relocate facility.
Relocations that require additional dedications or land transfer require
completion prior to obtaining plat and/or civil plan review approval.

17. The developer shall underground all existing electrical utilities located within
the public right-of-way that are impacted/ or need to be relocated as part of this
project. Coordinate with the affected utility companies for their review and
permitting.

18. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

19. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development the existence and
operational characteristics of agricultural uses. These documents must advise
purchasers that, under Section 3-112(E), Arizona Revised Statutes, the City of
Phoenix may not declare an agricultural operation conducted on farmland to be
a nuisance if the agricultural use is lawful, customary, reasonable, safe and
necessary to the agriculture industry. The form and content of such documents
shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to recordation.

20. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development the existence and
operational characteristics of the Phoenix Regional Police Academy gun range.
The form and content of such documents shall be reviewed by the City prior to
recordation.

21. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

22. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix Aviation Department for the site, per the content and form prescribed
by the City Attorney prior to final site plan approval.

23. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction
analysis review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department.




Page 572
24. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.

25. The developer shall dedicate a multi-use trail easement (MUTE) along the west
side of 19th Avenue and south side of South Mountain Avenue and construct a
minimum 10-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) within the easement in accordance
with the MAG supplemental detail, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. The developer shall work with the Site Planning
Section on an alternate design for the requirement through the technical appeal
process.

26. The developer shall provide 3 different front yard palettes consisting of two
large canopy accent trees, five shrubs and turf or ground cover, or offer
evidence of a landscaping incentive package, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. Required front yard trees shall be a minimum of 2-
inch caliper size and located to provide the maximum shade possible to
sidewalks within the development, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

27. The developer shall construct one bus stop pad along southbound 19th
Avenue. The bus stop pad shall be constructed according to the City of
Phoenix Standard Detail P1260 with a minimum depth of 10 feet and shall be
spaced from the intersection of South Mountain Avenue according to the City of
Phoenix Standard Detail P1258.

28. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 Waiver of Claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder’s Office and delivered to the city to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 2nd day of March,

2022.




Page 573
________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (2 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 574
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-58-21-8


Parcel No. 1:

That part of the Southeast quarter of Section 1, Township 1 South, Range 2 East1 of
the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, described as
follows:

Commencing at the East quarter corner of said Section 1 marked with a brass cap flush,
from which the center quarter corner of said Section 1 marked with a brass cap flush,
bears South 89 degrees 39 minutes 41 seconds West, a distance of 2632.50 feet;
Thence along the East-West Mid-Section line of said Section 11 South 89 degrees 39
minutes 41 seconds West, a distance of 33.01 feet;
Thence departing said East-West Mid-Section line, South 1 degree 06 minutes 34
seconds West, a distance of 33.01 feet to a point of intersection of the southerly right of
way line of South Mountain Road and the westerly right of way line of 19th Avenue, said
point also being the Point of Beginning;
Thence along said westerly right of way line South 1 degrees 06 minutes 34 seconds
West, a distance of 656.30 feet to the North line of the parcel as shown in Warranty
Deed recorded at Recorder's No, 1990-24106 of Maricopa County Records;
Thence along the Northerly line of said parcel South 89 degrees 41 minutes 20 seconds
West, a distance of 995.89 feet;
Thence North 1 degrees 06 minutes 34 seconds East, a distance of 665.82 feet to the
Southerly right of way line of South Mountain Road;
Thence Easterly along said Southerly right of way North 89 degrees 39 minutes 41
seconds East, a distance of 995.90 feet to the Point of Beginning.

Parcel No. 2:

That part of the Southeast quarter of Section 11 Township 1 South, Range 2 East of the
Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, described as follows:
Commencing at the East quarter corner of said Section1 marked with a brass cap flush,
from which the center quarter corner of said Section 1 marked with a brass cap flush,
bears South 89 degrees 39 minutes 41 seconds West along the East-West Mid-Section
line of said Section1, a distance of 2632.50 feet;
Thence along said East-West Mid-Section line, South 89 degrees 39 minutes 41
seconds West, a distance of 1028.91 feet;
Thence departing said East-West Mid-Section line, South 1 degrees 06 minutes 34
seconds West, a distance of 33.01 feet to a point on the Southerly right of way line of
South Mountain Road and the north line of the parcel as shown in Warranty Deed
recorded at Recorder's No. 2001-1220430 of Maricopa County Records, said point also
being the Point of Beginning;




Page 575
Thence departing said right of way, South 1 degrees 06 minutes 34 seconds West1 a
distance of 327.86 feet to the north line of the parcel as shown in Warranty Deed
recorded at Recorder's No. 2001-1220429 of Maricopa County Records;
Thence South 1 degrees 06 minutes 34 seconds West, a distance of 327.96 feet to a
point on the north line of a parcel as shown in Warranty Deed recorded at Recorder's
No. 2016-919336 of Maricopa County Records;
Thence along said north line, South 89 degrees 41 minutes 20 seconds West, a
distance of 285.45 feet to a found 1h inch rebar with tag stamped PLS 42014 on the
east line of a parcel as shown in Warranty Deed recorded at Recorder's No. 2019-
203874 of Maricopa County Records;
Thence along said east line, North 1 degree 24 minutes 23 seconds East along said
east line, a distance of 28.85 feet to a found 1h inch rebar with cap stamped RLS
16785, said rebar marking the Southeast corner of the parcel as shown in Warranty
Deed recorded at Recorder's No. 1990-24106 of Maricopa County Records;
Thence along the east line of said parcel, North O degrees 59 minutes 30 seconds
East, a distance of 298.97 feet;
Thence along the east line of said parcel North 0 degrees 59 minutes 30 seconds East,
a distance of 327.85 feet to the southerly right of way of South Mountain Road;
Thence along said southerly right of way line, North 89 degrees 39 minutes 41 seconds
East, a distance of 286.59 feet to the Point of Beginning.




Page 576
Page 577
Attachment B




Staff Report Z-58-21-8
December 9, 2021

South Mountain Village Planning December 14, 2021
Committee Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: January 6, 2022
Request From: S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence District),
approved R1-18 (Single-Family Residence
District) (20.76 acres)
Request To: R1-10 (Single-Family Residence District)
(20.76 acres)
Proposed Use: Detached single-family residential
Location: Southwest corner of 19th Avenue and South
Mountain Avenue
Owner: PW Again, LLC
Applicant: Paul Gilbert, Beus Gilbert McGroder, PLLC
Representative: Paul Gilbert, Beus Gilbert McGroder, PLLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations


General Plan Conformity

Current: Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per
acre
General Plan Land Use Map Designation
Proposed (GPA-SM-3-21-8): Residential 2
to 3.5 dwelling units per acre

19th Avenue Arterial Street 33-foot west half street
Street Map Classification South Minor
Mountain Collector 33-foot south half street
Avenue Street




Page 578
Staff Report: Z-58-21-8
December 9, 2021




CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES & NEIGHBORHOODS CORE VALUE;
CERTAINTY & CHARACTER; DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Promote neighborhood identity
through planning that reinforces the existing landscaping and character of the area.
Each new development should contribute to the character identified for the village.

As stipulated, the development will promote neighborhood identity by incorporating density
and building height limitations, landscape enhancements, various perimeter lot widths, and
wider perimeter landscaped areas than required by the Zoning Ordinance, among other
enhancements. These will also promote the agrarian character of the area and vision of
the Rio Montaña Area Plan.


CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE
PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity, respectful of local
conditions and surrounding neighborhoods.

The proposal for a single-family detached residential community would allow development
of a housing product that is consistent with other single-family uses in the general area. As
stipulated, the development will incorporate a range of perimeter lot widths, wide
landscape areas, enhanced landscaping and height restrictions, which will also help to
provide a transition from the proposed development to adjacent large-lot residential and
rural properties.


BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES AND SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new development
and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.

The proposal, will be required to provide shade along the adjacent public sidewalks and
pedestrian pathways located within open space tracts. This will help to encourage walking
and to mitigate the urban heat island effect by covering hard surfaces, thus cooling the
micro-climate around the project vicinity.


Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives

Rio Montaña Area Plan: See Background Item No. 4.

Tree and Shade Master Plan: See Background Item No. 10.




Page 579
Staff Report: Z-58-21-8
December 9, 2021




Complete Streets Guidelines: See Background Item No. 11.

Zero Waste PHX: See Background Item No. 12.

Housing Phoenix: See Background Item No. 13.



Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning
Land Use Zoning
On Site Vacant S-1 (Approved R1-18)
North (across South Agricultural and large-lot
S-1
Mountain Avenue) residential
South Agricultural S-1 (Approved R1-18)
East (across 19th S-1 (Pending R1-10 zoning
Agricultural
Avenue) per case Z-31-21-8)
Agricultural and single-family
West S-1, S-1 (Approved R1-18)
residential

R1-10 – Single-Family Residential District
(Planned Residential Development Option)

Provisions on the
Standards R1-10 Requirements
proposed site plan
Gross Acreage - 20.76 acres
Total Maximum Number of 72 units, up to 93 with bonus 67 units (Met)
Units
Maximum Density 3.5 dwelling units per acre, up 3.23 dwelling units per acre
to 4.5 with bonus (Met)
Minimum Lot Width 45 feet 50 feet (Met)
Minimum Lot Depth 110 adjacent to arterial 110 (Met)
Maximum Building Height 2 stories and 30 feet 2 stories and 30 feet

Maximum Lot Coverage 40 percent, up to 50 percent Not specified
including attached shade
structures




Page 580
Staff Report: Z-58-21-8
December 9, 2021




MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS
Perimeter Streets: 15 feet 15 feet (Met)
(19th Avenue and South
Mountain Avenue)
Interior Perimeter Property Rear: 15 feet (1-story), Rear: 15 feet (1-story),
Lines: 20 feet (2-story) 20 feet (2-story) (Met)
(Side and Rear)
Side: 0 feet (1-story), 15 feet Side: 0 feet (1-story), 15
(2-story) feet (2-story) (Met)

MINIMUM LANDSCAPE SETBACKS AND STANDARDS
Adjacent to street (19th 15 feet average, 10 feet 19th Avenue: 25 feet (Met)
Avenue and South minimum
Mountain Avenue) South Mountain Avenue: 25
feet (Met)
Minimum Common Area 5% of gross site area 17% (Met)

Background/Issues/Analysis

SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone 20.76 acres located at the southwest corner of 19th Avenue
and South Mountain Avenue from S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence District), approved
R1-18 (Single-Family Residence District) to R1-10 (Single-Family Residence District)
for single-family residential uses. The site is presently vacant.

In 1960, the subject site was annexed into the City of Phoenix from unincorporated
Maricopa County and zoned S-1. Historic aerial imagery shows that the site was
historically utilized for agricultural purposes. In 2004, the site was rezoned to R1-18
as part of case Z-121-03-7 but has remained undeveloped since. Rezoning case Z-8-
18-8 was filed in 2018 for the subject site, requesting R1-10 zoning. However, this
case was ultimately withdrawn by the applicant prior to the City Council hearing.

SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
2. The surrounding area contains a variety of residential zoning districts including S-1
(Ranch or Farm Residence District), R1-18 (Single-Family Residence District), and
R1-10 (Single-Family Residence District). Properties north, across South Mountain
Avenue, are zoned S-1 and are presently large-lot residential. Properties to the west
of the site are zoned S-1 and S-1 (approved R1-18), and used for agriculture and
single-family residential.




Page 581
Staff Report: Z-58-21-8
December 9, 2021




The property south of the
site is zoned S-1 (approved
R1-18) and has an active
agricultural use.

The property east of the
site, across 19th Avenue, is
zoned S-1 and used for
agriculture. This property
has a pending request for
R1-10 zoning per case
Z-31-21-8.

Northwest of the site, across
South Mountain Avenue, is
a property zoned S-1
(approved R1-10). This Zoning Aerial Map, Source: Planning and Development
property is presently vacant, Department
but is planned for a
residential subdivision.

Approximately 0.1 miles north and northwest of the site are other properties zoned
R1-10. Similarly, numerous properties south of Dobbins Road, along 19th Avenue,
are also zoned R1-10.

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATIONS
3. The General Plan Land Use
Map designation for the
subject site is Residential 1
to 2 dwelling units per acre,
which is not consistent with
the proposed R1-10 zoning
district. Thus, a concurrent
minor General Plan
Amendment case GPA-SM-
3-21-8 proposes to change
the land use map
designation to Residential 2
to 3.5 dwelling units per
acre. The General Plan
Land Use Map designation General Plan Land Use Map, Source: Planning and Development
surrounding the site is Department




Page 582
Staff Report: Z-58-21-8
December 9, 2021




Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre. East of the site, across 19th Avenue, is a
property with a pending minor General Plan Amendment case, GPA-SM-2-21-8,
seeking to change the Land Use Map designation to Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling
units per acre.

Approximately 0.1 miles north of the site are other properties designated as
Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre in the General Plan Land Use Map.

4. Rio Montaña Area Plan
The Rio Montaña Area
Plan encourages
preservation of the rural
character of the area and
incorporates transition
zones to protect desert and
open space areas. The
plan also encourages
pedestrian and equestrian
activities through a network
of trails and aspires to
develop a sense of
community while
Rio Montaña Area Plan, Source: Planning and Development
encouraging investment in Department
the community.

The Rio Montaña Area Plan intends to accomplish this vision through seven goals
that include:

1. Promoting balanced, high quality development;
2. Protecting and improving neighborhoods through maintenance, rehabilitation
and infill projects;
3. Keeping a distinctive character that reflects the diversity in its equestrian
heritage, culture, history and architecture;
4. Protecting the rural character, the Sonoran Desert and the riparian potential of
the Rio Salado Habitat Restoration Project;
5. Promoting future business development and economic growth;
6. Developing the tourism industry through a wide range of opportunities;
7. Providing a variety of transportation options.

The site is relatively centrally located and designated by the land use map as
Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre within the Plan. As previously mentioned, a
concurrent General Plan Land Use Map amendment case GPA-SM-3-21-8 proposes




Page 583
Staff Report: Z-58-21-8
December 9, 2021




to change this designation to Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre. Although
not consistent with the Rio Montaña Proposed Land Use Plan, a gradual increase in
intensity at this location is appropriate given the included design considerations
intended to further the goals of the Plan.

Per the proposed stipulations, the development will incorporate a range of perimeter
lot widths ranging from 60 feet to 70 feet, provide wider landscape areas along the
perimeters than required by the Zoning Ordinance, require pitched roofs to be
incorporated on all buildings, incorporate one-story limitations and enhanced
landscaping along perimeters. These elements will help provide an appropriate land
use transition consistent with development patterns in the general area, while
furthering the intent of the Rio Montaña Area Plan.

PROPOSAL
5. The proposal is to develop a 67-lot, single-family detached residential subdivision
with a primary street access point along 19th Avenue on the east and exit only point
along South Mountain Avenue on the north. A density of 3.23 dwelling units per acre
is depicted in the proposed site plan, which also depicts a variety of lot widths
ranging from 50 feet to 70 feet in width.




Conceptual Site Plan with Planning and Development Department annotations,
Source: Harrington Planning + Design

Conformance to the conceptual site plan provided by the applicant is recommended



Page 584
Staff Report: Z-58-21-8
December 9, 2021




by staff to provide certainty in how the project will develop and also to preserve the
perimeter transitions along the north, south and west property lines via 60 to 70-
foot-wide perimeter lots and wider landscape areas. Open space areas are also
provided throughout the site for easy access by future residents. Furthermore,
enhanced building setbacks along 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue will
ensure that future homes will be placed more internally within the site. Stipulation
No. 1 addresses conformance to the site plan to ensure that the development is built
as proposed.

Staff also recommends Stipulation No. 2 which addresses landscaping
enhancements along perimeter landscape setbacks to help maintain the character
of the neighborhood and provide a transition in concert with the goals of the
Rio Montaña Area Plan.

Lastly, Stipulation No. 3 as recommended by staff, will limit the building height for
lots along the perimeters which shall be one story and 20 feet in height. These
stipulations will help provide an appropriate transition from existing residential and
agricultural uses in the area, and further many of the goals from the Rio Montaña
Area Plan by protecting existing neighborhoods and maintaining a distinctive
character plus scale.

6. Front building elevations were submitted by the applicant, depicting a variety of
architectural styles, with various colors and textures proposed. These front building
elevations show one and two-story housing products.

Staff does not recommend conformance to these building renderings, as only the
front building elevations were provided. However, staff recommends that all lots,
including 70-foot wide lots, be subject to the Single-Family Design Review standards
outlined in Section 507 Tab.A.II. of the Zoning Ordinance. This is addressed in
Stipulation No. 4.

Furthermore, staff recommends Stipulation No. 5 to require that all building
elevations incorporate several enhancements including: multiple colors, exterior
accent materials, and textural differences that exhibit quality and durability.




Page 585
Staff Report: Z-58-21-8
December 9, 2021




Stipulation No. 5 also requires
that a minimum of 50 percent
of the elevations for each
floor plan shall provide a
covered front porch in the
front yard. This design feature
will reinforce community
orientation, consistent with
the Rio Montaña Area Plan.




Conceptual Front Building Elevations, Source: Not specified

7. Fencing and wall enhancements are addressed in Stipulation No. 6 and include full
view fencing requirements where open space areas are adjacent to a public street.
Furthermore, Stipulation No. 6 allows for solid walls topped with open view fencing to
be utilized where required by the Zoning Ordinance, primarily where lots are adjacent
to an open space area, unless conflicts arise between this requirement and other City
or County regulations. These elements will increase visibility within these areas and
promote an open feel both within the community and along adjacent streets.

Perimeter wall enhancements along adjacent public streets are also addressed in
Stipulation No. 6, and will help to improve the streetscape by providing visual interest
via wall-offsets and material and textural differences.

The development proposes a primary vehicular access to the community along 19th




Page 586
Staff Report: Z-58-21-8
December 9, 2021




Avenue and egress-only along South Mountain Avenue. In order to promote a sense
of place for future residents, Stipulation No. 7 recommends that each of the vehicular
entryways incorporate decorative materials. Furthermore, staff is recommending
Stipulation No. 8 to require enhanced landscaping on both sides of each entryway
into the development containing a variety of plant materials for visual interest.

8. The area surrounding the site offers a variety of recreational and multimodal
transportation opportunities. In addition, the proposed development will provide
various amenity areas throughout the development. Staff recommends various
pedestrian connections and enhancements throughout the community to promote
recreation, walking and alternative transportation methods. Stipulation No. 9
addresses the following connections to/between:

• Amenity areas;
• Sidewalks;
• Centralized pedestrian path connecting the northern and southern portion of
the site;
• Shaded pedestrian path that connects to either 19th Avenue or South
Mountain Avenue near the street intersection.




Page 587
Staff Report: Z-58-21-8
December 9, 2021




9. The conceptual site plan also depicts various open space
areas distributed throughout the development for future
residents to enjoy. Staff is recommending Stipulation No.
10 to limit the use of high-water use plants within common
landscaped areas to help conserve water and to allow the
applicant to strategically place plants, such as turf, in areas
of high activity and retention basins, among other areas.
Staff recommends Stipulation No. 11 to require several
amenities distributed throughout the development including:

• Tot lot with shade equipment;
• One picnic area with a barbeque grill, shade ramada
and a picnic table;
• Two benches or seating features;

These amenities will promote the health of future residents
by providing recreational opportunities through various
activities, allowing the enjoyment of sunlight, and having a
communal space that enables social interactions.




Amenity areas depicted in
the conceptual Site Plan,
Source: Harrington
Planning + Design

STUDIES AND POLICIES
10. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan encourages treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure the trees are an integral part of the City’s planning and
development process. Sidewalks on the street frontages should be detached from the
curbs to allow trees to be planted on both sides of the sidewalk to provide thermal
comfort for pedestrians and to reduce the urban heat island effect. Staff is
recommending several stipulations designed to provide trees and enhance shade
within the development.

Staff is recommending stipulations for enhanced landscaping and shaded sidewalks
along the perimeter property lines as follows:




Page 588
Staff Report: Z-58-21-8
December 9, 2021




• Fifty-percent two-inch caliper and 50-percent three-inch caliper trees within the
required landscape setbacks (Stipulation No. 2);

• Shaded pathway connecting the community to or near the intersection of 19th
Avenue and South Mountain Avenue (Stipulation No. 9);

• Tot lot amenity with shade equipment (Stipulation No. 11);

• The sidewalks along 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue shall be
detached and shaded a minimum of 75 percent with two-inch caliper trees
(Stipulation No. 12 and 13).

11. Complete Streets Guidelines
In 2014, the City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding
Principles. The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an
accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such as
bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. This development will help encourage
connectivity within the development and adjacent streets by providing a network of
pedestrian pathways. Furthermore, the project will pedestrianize the immediate street
frontages by providing shaded detached sidewalks along 19th Avenue and South
Mountain Avenue. These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 9, 12 and 13.

12. Zero Waste PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal to
become a zero-waste city, as part of the city’s overall 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and
expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs. The City of Phoenix offers
recycling services for residential properties. The application materials submitted by
the applicant indicate that recycling facilities will be available to residents.

13. Housing Phoenix
In June 2020, the Phoenix City Council approved the Housing Phoenix Plan. This
Plan contains policy initiatives for the development and preservation of housing with
a vision of creating a stronger and more vibrant Phoenix through increased housing
options for residents at all income levels and family sizes. Phoenix’s rapid population
growth and housing underproduction has led to a need for over 163,000 new housing
units. Current shortages of housing supply relative to demand are a primary reason
why housing costs are increasing. The proposed development supports the Plan’s
goal of preserving or creating 50,000 housing units by 2030 by contributing to a
variety housing types that will address the supply shortage at a more rapid pace
while using vacant land in a more sustainable fashion.




Page 589
Staff Report: Z-58-21-8
December 9, 2021




Stipulation No. 1 would allow the developer to construct up to 67 single-family
detached residential lots. If this development is approved, it would allow further
diversity in housing products within the area and new housing choice for existing and
new residents to the area.

COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
14. As of the writing of this report, staff received one letter in opposition regarding this
request, citing issues with land use compatibility due to the rural nature of the area,
density concerns, impacts to existing neighbors, inadequate infrastructure, increased
traffic, impacts to property values, and lack of conformance to the Rio Montaña Area
Plan. In addition, a support petition containing various signatures was received for
this project.

Furthermore, the Roosevelt School District provided a letter stating that the school
district has adequate school facilities to accommodate the projected number of
additional students generated by the proposed development.

INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
15. The Pedestrian Safety coordinator with the Street Transportation Department
provided comments pertaining to providing a direct pedestrian connection from the
development to the intersection of 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue.
Stipulation No. 9 addresses this pedestrian connection.

16. The Street Transportation Department provided comments pertaining to detached
sidewalks along adjacent streets. Other comments provided pertained to adjacent
right-of-way dedication and street construction, overhead utility undergrounding,
junction box installation at street intersections, relocation of irrigation facilities, and
other general street improvement requirements. These comments are addressed in
Stipulation Nos. 12 through 18.

17. The Fire Department indicated there are no problems anticipated with the case and
that the site and/or buildings shall comply with the 2018 International Fire Code with
Phoenix Amendments. Further, the Department commented that they do not know
the water supply at this site and noted that additional water supply may be required
to meet the required fire flow per the Fire Code.

18. The Water Services Departments commented that there are sewer mains that can
potentially serve the development. A water main extension will be required at the
time of development. However, capacity is a dynamic condition that can change over
time due to a variety of factors. Furthermore, the City intends to provide water and
sewer service, requirements and assurances for which are determined during the site
plan review process. For any given property, water and sewer requirements may vary




Page 590
Staff Report: Z-58-21-8
December 9, 2021




over time to be less or more restrictive depending on the status of the City’s water
and sewer infrastructure.

19. The Floodplain Management division of the Public Works Department did not have
any comments on this case.

OTHER
20. The subject site is within close proximity to properties used for agricultural uses, and
approximately 1 mile northwest of the Phoenix Regional Police Academy, thus
potentially leading to dust, odors, noise or other impacts to future residential uses on
the site. Stipulation Nos. 19 and 20 would require the disclosure, the existence and
operational characteristics of agricultural activities and the Phoenix Regional Police
Academy gun range to purchasers of property within the development.

21. The Aviation Department requires that the property owner record a Notice to
Prospective Purchasers of Proximity to Airport in order to disclose the existence,
and operational characteristics of City of Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport
(PHX) to future owners or tenants of the property. Furthermore, that an avigation
easement is dedicated to the City of Phoenix as this property is within the PHX
International Airport traffic pattern airspace and seeking noise sensitive land use.
Lastly, that a No Hazard Determination for the proposed development be provided
from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction analysis review process.
These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 21, 22 and 23.

22. The site is not identified as being archaeologically sensitive. However, in the event
archaeological materials are encountered during construction, all ground disturbing
activities must cease within a 33-foot radius of the discovery and the City of Phoenix
Archaeology Office must be notified immediately and allowed time to properly assess
the materials. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 24.

23. The developer shall provide a hydraulic/hydrologic analysis of offsite storm water
flows, when present, at the time of preliminary site plan submittal for verification of
required infrastructure regarding lot space and density.

24. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and ordinances.
Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements such as obtaining a
use permit to conduct the proposed outdoor use in this zoning district. Other formal
actions such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and abandonments, may be
required.




Page 591
Staff Report: Z-58-21-8
December 9, 2021




Findings

1. This proposed development provides a housing option that is consistent with
development patterns in the general area.

2. As stipulated, the proposed development is generally consistent with design policies
and the intent of the Rio Montaña Area Plan.

3. This proposed development is appropriately located at the intersection of an arterial
and minor collector street, and in proximity to transit service located along Baseline
Road.

Stipulations

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date stamped
November 22, 2021, as modified by the following stipulations and approved by the
Planning and Development Department with specific regard to the following:

a. The development shall be limited to a maximum of 67 lots.


b. Lots 1 through 14 shall be a minimum of 65 feet in width.


c. Lots 15, 16, 17 and 49 shall be a minimum of 60 feet in width.


d. Lots 50 through 67 shall be a minimum of 70 feet in width.


e. All other lots shall be a minimum of 50 feet in width.


f. Lots shall be a minimum of 45 feet from the southern perimeter property line.


g. Lots shall be a minimum of 25 feet from the western perimeter property line.


h. A minimum 10-foot wide landscape setback shall be provided along the southern
and western perimeter of the site.

i. The location of the open space areas.




Page 592
Staff Report: Z-58-21-8
December 9, 2021




j. A minimum of 17 percent of the gross site area, exclusive of required landscape
setbacks, shall be provided as open space.

k. A minimum building setback of 50 feet, exclusive of fencing, entry features or
detached accessory structures, shall be provided along the northern and eastern
perimeter of the site along 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue.

l. A minimum 25-foot wide landscape setback shall be provided along 19th Avenue
and South Mountain Avenue. The landscape setback may be reduced to 20 feet
for up to 50 percent of this frontage for the purpose of staggering the perimeter
theme wall.

2. All landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 50-percent 2-inch caliper and
50-percent 3-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings, with five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

3. The maximum building height for lots 1 through 17 and lots 49 through 67, as
depicted on the site plan date stamped November 22, 2021, shall be limited to one
story and 20 feet.

4. All lots in the development shall be subject to Single-Family Design Review, including
lots that are wider than 65 feet, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

5. Building elevations shall be developed to the following standards, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department:

a. Building elevations shall contain multiple colors, exterior accent materials and
textural changes that exhibit quality and durability such as brick, stone, colored
textured concrete or stucco, or other materials to provide a decorative and
aesthetic treatment.

b. A minimum of 50 percent of the elevations for each floor plan shall provide a
covered front porch in the front yard with a minimum of 60 square feet in area at
a depth of at least six feet. No porch shall terminate within the plane of a door or
window.

c. Pitched roofs shall be provided on all primary building elevations.




Page 593
Staff Report: Z-58-21-8
December 9, 2021




6. Fences and wall are subject to the following stipulations, in addition to the Zoning
Ordinance requirements, and approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

a. Full open view fencing shall be utilized where walls are proposed around open
space areas adjacent to a perimeter public street.

b. Where view fencing is required by the Zoning Ordinance, a combination of solid
masonry wall and view fencing may be utilized. The solid portion of the wall shall
not exceed 4 feet in height, or as otherwise required by a City or County barrier
regulation.

c. Perimeter walls bounding the rear yard property lines of residential lots along
19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue shall include minimum three foot
offsets and material and textural differences, such as stucco and/or split face
block or a decorative element, such as tile or stamped designs, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

7. Project entry/exit drives along 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue shall
incorporate decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or similar alternative
material, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. Project entry/exit drives along 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue shall
incorporate enhanced landscaping on both sides planted with a variety of at least
three plant materials, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Each landscaped area shall be a minimum of 250-square feet.

9. A system of pedestrian connections shall be provided, to connect the following as
described below and as approved by the Planning and Development Department:

a. Amenity areas.

b. Sidewalks.

c. Pedestrian path connecting the northern and southern portions of the site via a
centralized pathway.

d. The common open space tract along the southwest corner of 19th Avenue and
South Mountain Avenue shall contain a minimum 8-foot wide pedestrian pathway
that connects the development with the sidewalk at 19th Avenue or South
Mountain Avenue near the street intersection. This pathway shall be constructed
of decomposed stabilized granite, decorative pavers, stamped or colored




Page 594
Staff Report: Z-58-21-8
December 9, 2021




concrete, or similar alternative material. The landscaped tract shall contain
minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees planted a minimum of 25 feet on center or
equivalent groupings, along both sides of the pedestrian pathway.

10. No more than 50 percent of the landscape areas within common areas or 10 percent
of the net development area whichever is less, should be planted in turf or high-water
use plants. Turf areas should be located only in the common open space areas,
including retention basins, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. This requirement does not apply to landscaping located within private
yards on individual lots.

11. The following shall be provided and dispersed throughout the development, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department:

a. Tot lot with shade equipment;

b. One picnic area with a barbeque grill, shade ramada and a picnic table; and

c. Two benches or seating features.

12. The sidewalk along 19th Avenue shall be a minimum of five feet in width and
detached with a minimum 13-foot wide landscape strip located between the sidewalk
and back of curb and planted to the following standards, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant shade trees
planted 25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings that provide shade to a
minimum 75 percent at maturity.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian
environment.

13. All sidewalks along South Mountain Avenue shall be detached with a minimum five-
foot wide landscape strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb and planted
to the following standards, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant shade trees
planted 25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings that provide shade to a




Page 595
Staff Report: Z-58-21-8
December 9, 2021




minimum 75 percent at maturity.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian
environment.

14. The developer shall dedicate 50-feet of right-of-way and construct the west half of
19th Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

15. The developer shall provide conduit and junction boxes at 19th Avenue and South
Mountain Avenue for future traffic signal equipment on the southwest corner of the
intersection. All work related to the construction or reconstruction of the conduit runs
and junction box installation shall be the responsibility of the Developer.

16. Existing irrigation facilities along 19th Avenue are to be undergrounded and relocated
outside of City of Phoenix right-of-way. Contact SRP to identify existing land rights
and establish appropriate process to relocate facility. Relocations that require
additional dedications or land transfer require completion prior to obtaining plat
and/or civil plan review approval.

17. The developer shall underground all existing electrical utilities located within the
public right-of-way that are impacted/ or need to be relocated as part of this project.
Coordinate with the affected utility companies for their review and permitting.

18. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping
and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

19. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development the existence and
operational characteristics of agricultural uses. These documents must advise
purchasers that, under Section 3-112(E), Arizona Revised Statutes, the City of
Phoenix may not declare an agricultural operation conducted on farmland to be a
nuisance if the agricultural use is lawful, customary, reasonable, safe and necessary
to the agriculture industry. The form and content of such documents shall be
reviewed and approved by the City prior to recordation.

20. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development the existence and




Page 596
Staff Report: Z-58-21-8
December 9, 2021




operational characteristics of the Phoenix Regional Police Academy gun range. The
form and content of such documents shall be reviewed by the City prior to
recordation.

21. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or tenants
of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

22. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of Phoenix
Aviation Department for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City
Attorney prior to final site plan approval.

23. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction analysis
review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

24. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the Archeology
Office to properly assess the materials.

Writer
Enrique Bojórquez Gaxiola
December 9, 2021

Team Leader
Samantha Keating

Exhibits
Zoning sketch map
Aerial sketch map
Conceptual Site Plan date stamped November 22, 2021
Conceptual Front Building Elevations date stamped August 27, 2021
Community Correspondence (3 page)




Page 597
R1-10 R1-10
Z-109-00
R1-10 * S-1 PRD *
Z-66-01
S-1 R1-6 *
Z-121-03
Z-105-05



IAN DR




R1-10 PRD *
Z-47-17

S-1
R1-10 *
R1-8 * Z-121-03
Z-121-03



LATONA LN

S-1
R1-18 *
ANX 49
Z-171-99

SOUTH MOUNTAIN AVE




R1-18 *
Z-121-03 R1-18 *
Z-151-04




ALLEN ST




SAMANTHA WAY




S-1 S-1



S-1 SP* R1-10
Z-SP-25-06




I
Miles
I-10
0.1 0.05 0 0.1 BROADWAY RD


SOUTH MOUNTAIN VILLAGE SOUTHERN AVE


CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 8 BASELINE RD


DOBBINS RD




Z-58-21


APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Beus Gilbert McGroder PLLC/Paul Gilbert
FROM:
S-1 (Approved R1-18) ( 20.76 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
9/24/2021
Z-58-21 REVISION DATES:



GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
20.76 Acres QS 02-24 C-7 TO: R1-10 ( 20.76 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 (Approved R1-18) 20 (40) N/A (48)
R1-10 72 93

* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2021\Z-58-21.mxd
Page 598
R1-10 R1-10
Z-109-00
R1-10 * S-1 PRD *
Z-66-01
S-1 R1-6 *
Z-121-03
Z-105-05



IAN DR




R1-10 PRD *
Z-47-17

S-1
R1-10 *
R1-8 * Z-121-03
Z-121-03



LATONA LN

S-1
R1-18 *
ANX 49
Z-171-99

SOUTH MOUNTAIN AVE




R1-18 *
Z-121-03 R1-18 *
Z-151-04




ALLEN ST




SAMANTHA WAY




S-1 S-1



S-1 SP* R1-10
Z-SP-25-06




I
Miles
I-10
0.1 0.05 0 0.1 BROADWAY RD


SOUTH MOUNTAIN VILLAGE SOUTHERN AVE


CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 8 BASELINE RD


DOBBINS RD




Z-58-21


APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Beus Gilbert McGroder PLLC/Paul Gilbert
FROM:
S-1 (Approved R1-18) ( 20.76 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
9/24/2021
Z-58-21 REVISION DATES:



GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
20.76 Acres QS 02-24 C-7 TO: R1-10 ( 20.76 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 (Approved R1-18) 20 (40) N/A (48)
R1-10 72 93

* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2021\Z-58-21.mxd
Page 599
Page 600
Page 601
Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola

To: Erin Hegedus
Subject: RE: Rezoning request for 19th Avenue & Southern



For Z 31 21 8 and GPA SM 2 21 8, and Z 58 21 8 and GPA SM 3 21 8 case files.

From: Erin Hegedus
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 5:10 PM
To: info@TechnicalSolutionsAZ.com; Council District 8 PCC
Subject: Rezoning request for 19th Avenue & Southern

I reside at 8630 South 19th Avenue and am very concerned with the request to rezone this property.
Myself and our neighbors have aggressively contested this previously and continue to do so.

My concerns, to list a few are:

Infrastructure does not support an increase in density.

o South Mountain Avenue is at best a two lane road from 7th Street to 27th Avenue. There
are several areas of this road that are only one lane and the road is continually backed
up especially when school is in session.
o 19th Avenue is also a two lane road with open canals to the east and the west and
cannot support the current traffic and has been subject to several fatalities in the last 3
years.
o Additionally, Dobbins Road is a two lane road from 20th Street to 43rd Avenue and has
been heavily backed up for years.

There are many developments on Dobbins Road that are in process that are going to affect all of us that
reside in the area.

Furthermore, the housing that is proposed is not compliant with the homes that are in the area, which
are larger lots, higher value and conform to the current Rio Montana plan that was approved by the City
Council.

I am not only concerned with the lack of infrastructure but the fact that the higher density homes will
greatly devalue our homes that conform to the current zoning.

I ask that you review the plans and decrease the density to conform to the Rio Montana plan as we have
requested previously.

Sincerely,
Erin Hegedus, CMRP




Sent from Mail [go.microsoft.com] for Windows



Page 602
Page 603
Page 604
Attachment C




ADDENDUM A
Staff Report: Z-58-21-8
January 10, 2022

South Mountain Village Planning January 11, 2022
Committee Meeting Date: December 14, 2021
Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 3, 2022
January 6, 2022
Request From: S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence District),
approved R1-18 (Single-Family Residence
District) (20.76 acres)
Request To: R1-10 (Single-Family Residence District)
(20.76 acres)
Proposed Use: Detached single-family residential
Location: Southwest corner of 19th Avenue and
South Mountain Avenue
Owner: PW Again, LLC
Applicant: Paul Gilbert, Beus Gilbert McGroder, PLLC
Representative: Paul Gilbert, Beus Gilbert McGroder, PLLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations


The South Mountain Village Planning Committee heard this rezoning request on
December 14, 2021 and voted (11-0) to continue the case to the January 11, 2022
South Mountain Village Planning Committee meeting, in agreement with the applicant.
Subsequently, the Planning Commission continued this case to the February 3, 2022
Planning Commission hearing on January 6, 2022.

As a result of the discussion at the December 14, 2021 Village Planning Committee
meeting, the applicant has provided an updated site plan, wall plan, and wall elevations,
attached to this report, which depicts a decrease in the number of lots from 67 to 66 on
the subject site. The layout of the site was also modified and now proposes primary
vehicular access along South Mountain Avenue. Furthermore, the applicant has
requested to limit all homes in this development to a maximum height of one story and
22 feet.

Other changes to the site and landscape plans include the location of centralized open
space directly across the primary entrance, increased setbacks along the western
perimeter, increase in the number of 60-foot wide lots, a trail or pathway along the north
and west perimeters of the site and increased pedestrian connections within the


Page 605
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-58-21-8
January 10, 2022


development. Due to these changes, staff recommends modifying the following
stipulations:

• Stipulation No. 1 regarding general conformance with the site plan and updates
reflected within the latest plan pertaining to lot widths, lot locations and vehicular
access along South Mountain Avenue;
• Stipulation No. 3 regarding limitations to one-story homes;
• Stipulation No. 6 regarding general conformance to the new proposed wall plan
and wall elevations, plus elements depicted in these plans;
• Stipulation Nos. 7 and 8 regarding reference to the primary entrance to the
development along South Mountain Avenue;
• Stipulation No. 9 regarding the central pedestrian connection layout;
• Stipulation No. 11 regarding changes to the amenity area;
• New Stipulation No. 25 regarding a pedestrian pathway or trail along the
perimeter of the property as requested by the South Mountain Village Planning
Committee;
• New Stipulation No. 26 regarding a landscape palette within individual lots to
promote shade within internal streets as requested by the South Mountain Village
Planning Committee;
• New Stipulation No. 27 regarding a bus stop pad along 19th Avenue as
requested by the South Mountain Village Planning Committee.

Leading up to and following the December 14, 2021 South Mountain Village Planning
Committee meeting, staff received additional correspondence from the public regarding
this case. This additional correspondence is also attached.

Staff recommends approval per the modified stipulations, reflecting updates to the site
plan, provided below:

Stipulations

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date stamped
November 22, 2021 JANUARY 3, 2022, as modified by the following stipulations and
approved by the Planning and Development Department with specific regard to the
following:

a. The development shall be limited to a maximum of 67 66 lots.


b. Lots 1 through 14 7 AND LOTS 62 THROUGH 66 shall be a minimum of 65 feet
in width.

c. Lots 15, 16, 17 and 49 8 THROUGH 13 shall be a minimum of 60 feet in width.


d. Lots 50 14 through 67 28 AND LOT 61 shall be a minimum of 70 feet in width.

Page 606
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-58-21-8
January 10, 2022



e. All other lots shall be a minimum of 50 feet in width.


f. Lots shall be a minimum of 45 feet from the southern perimeter property line.


g. Lots shall be a minimum of 25 50 feet from the western perimeter property line.


h. A minimum 10-foot wide landscape setback shall be provided along the southern
and western perimeter of the site.

i. The location of the open space areas.


j. A minimum of 17 percent of the gross site area, exclusive of required landscape
setbacks, shall be provided as open space.

k. A minimum building setback of 50 feet, exclusive of fencing, entry features or
detached accessory structures, shall be provided along the northern and eastern
perimeter of the site along 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue.

l. A minimum 25-foot wide landscape setback shall be provided along 19th Avenue
and South Mountain Avenue. The landscape setback may be reduced to 20 feet
for up to 50 percent of this frontage for the purpose of staggering the perimeter
theme wall.

M. FULL INGRESS AND EGRESS TO THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE LIMITED
TO SOUTH MOUNTAIN AVENUE.

2. All landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 50-percent 2-inch caliper and
50-percent 3-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings, with five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

3. The maximum building height for lots 1 through 17 and lots 49 through 67, as
depicted on the site plan date stamped November 22, 2021, shall be limited to one
story and 20 22 feet.

4. All lots in the development shall be subject to Single-Family Design Review, including
lots that are wider than 65 feet, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

5. Building elevations shall be developed to the following standards, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department:


Page 607
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-58-21-8
January 10, 2022


a. Building elevations shall contain multiple colors, exterior accent materials and
textural changes that exhibit quality and durability such as brick, stone, colored
textured concrete or stucco, or other materials to provide a decorative and
aesthetic treatment.

b. A minimum of 50 percent of the elevations for each floor plan shall provide a
covered front porch in the front yard with a minimum of 60 square feet in area at
a depth of at least six feet. No porch shall terminate within the plane of a door or
window.

c. Pitched roofs shall be provided on all primary building elevations.

6. Fences and wall are subject to the following stipulations, in addition to the Zoning
Ordinance requirements, and approved by the Planning and Development
Department. FENCES AND WALLS SHALL BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE
WITH THE SITE WALL ELEVATIONS DATE STAMPED DECEMBER 23, 2021 AND
SITE WALL PLAN DATE STAMPED JANUARY 3, 2022, AS MODIFIED BY THE
FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS, AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT:

a. Full open view fencing, WHICH MAY INCLUDE SOLID COLUMNS UP TO 24
INCHES IN WIDTH, shall be utilized where walls are proposed around open
space areas adjacent to a perimeter public street.

b. Where view fencing is required by the Zoning Ordinance, a combination of solid
masonry wall and view fencing may be utilized. The solid portion of the wall shall
not exceed 4 feet in height, or as otherwise required by a City or County barrier
regulation. THE WALL LAYOUT DEPICTED IN THE WALL PLAN SHALL BE
MODIFIED WHERE NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE SITE LAYOUT
CHANGES THAT AVOID CONFLICTS WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE OR
CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS.

c. Perimeter walls bounding the rear yard property lines of residential lots along
19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue shall include minimum three foot
offsets and material and textural differences, such as stucco, and/or split face
OR SLUMP block or a decorative element, such as tile or stamped designs, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

7. Project entry/exit drives along 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue shall
incorporate decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or similar alternative
material, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. Project entry/exit drives along 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue shall
incorporate enhanced landscaping on both sides planted with a variety of at least
three plant materials, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Each landscaped area shall be a minimum of 250-square feet.


Page 608
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-58-21-8
January 10, 2022


9. A system of pedestrian connections shall be provided, to connect the following as
described below and as approved by the Planning and Development Department:

a. Amenity areas.

b. Sidewalks.

c. Pedestrian path connecting the northern PRIMARY AMENITY AREA and
southern WESTERN portions of the site via a centralized pathway.

d. The common open space tract along the southwest corner of 19th Avenue and
South Mountain Avenue shall contain a minimum 8-foot wide pedestrian pathway
that connects the development with the sidewalk at 19th Avenue or South
Mountain Avenue near the street intersection. This pathway shall be constructed
of decomposed stabilized granite, decorative pavers, stamped or colored
concrete, or similar alternative material. The landscaped tract shall contain
minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees planted a minimum of 25 feet on center or
equivalent groupings, along both sides of the pedestrian pathway.

10. No more than 50 percent of the landscape areas within common areas or 10 percent
of the net development area whichever is less, should be planted in turf or high-water
use plants. Turf areas should be located only in the common open space areas,
including retention basins, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. This requirement does not apply to landscaping located within private
yards on individual lots.

11. The following shall be provided IN THE CENTRAL AMENITY AREA and/OR
dispersed throughout the development, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department:

a. Tot lot with shade equipment;

b. One picnic area with a barbeque grill, shade ramada and a picnic table; and

c. Two benches or seating features.

12. The sidewalk along 19th Avenue shall be a minimum of five feet in width and
detached with a minimum 13-foot wide landscape strip located between the sidewalk
and back of curb and planted to the following standards, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant shade trees
planted 25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings that provide shade to a
minimum 75 percent at maturity.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at maturity.


Page 609
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-58-21-8
January 10, 2022


Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian
environment.

13. All sidewalks along South Mountain Avenue shall be detached with a minimum five-
foot wide landscape strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb and planted
to the following standards, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant shade trees
planted 25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings that provide shade to a
minimum 75 percent at maturity.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian
environment.

14. The developer shall dedicate 50-feet of right-of-way and construct the west half of
19th Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

15. The developer shall provide conduit and junction boxes at 19th Avenue and South
Mountain Avenue for future traffic signal equipment on the southwest corner of the
intersection. All work related to the construction or reconstruction of the conduit runs
and junction box installation shall be the responsibility of the Developer.

16. Existing irrigation facilities along 19th Avenue are to be undergrounded and relocated
outside of City of Phoenix right-of-way. Contact SRP to identify existing land rights
and establish appropriate process to relocate facility. Relocations that require
additional dedications or land transfer require completion prior to obtaining plat
and/or civil plan review approval.

17. The developer shall underground all existing electrical utilities located within the
public right-of-way that are impacted/ or need to be relocated as part of this project.
Coordinate with the affected utility companies for their review and permitting.

18. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping
and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

19. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development the existence and
operational characteristics of agricultural uses. These documents must advise
purchasers that, under Section 3-112(E), Arizona Revised Statutes, the City of
Phoenix may not declare an agricultural operation conducted on farmland to be a

Page 610
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-58-21-8
January 10, 2022


nuisance if the agricultural use is lawful, customary, reasonable, safe and necessary
to the agriculture industry. The form and content of such documents shall be
reviewed and approved by the City prior to recordation.

20. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development the existence and
operational characteristics of the Phoenix Regional Police Academy gun range. The
form and content of such documents shall be reviewed by the City prior to
recordation.

21. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or tenants
of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

22. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of Phoenix
Aviation Department for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City
Attorney prior to final site plan approval.

23. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction analysis
review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

24. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the Archeology
Office to properly assess the materials.

25. IN ADDITION TO THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK, A MINIMUM 8-FOOT-WIDE
PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY OR TRAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED AND MAINTAINED
WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT ALONG 19TH AVENUE AND SOUTH MOUNTAIN
AVENUE, CONSTRUCTED OF DECOMPOSED GRANITE OR SIMILAR
ALTERNATIVE MATERIAL, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

26. THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE 3 DIFFERENT FRONT YARD PALETTES
CONSISTING OF ONE LARGE CANOPY ACCENT TREE, FIVE SHRUBS AND
TURF OR GROUND COVER, OR OFFER EVIDENCE OF A LANDSCAPING
INCENTIVE PACKAGE, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. REQUIRED FRONT YARD TREES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2-
INCH CALIPER SIZE AND LOCATED TO PROVIDE THE MAXIMUM SHADE
POSSIBLE TO SIDEWALKS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT, AS APPROVED BY
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

27. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT ONE BUS STOP PAD ALONG
SOUTHBOUND 19TH AVENUE. THE BUS STOP PAD SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED

Page 611
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-58-21-8
January 10, 2022


ACCORDING TO CITY OF PHOENIX STANDARD DETAIL P1260 WITH A
MINIMUM DEPTH OF 10 FEET AND SHALL BE SPACED FROM THE
INTERSECTION OF SOUTH MOUNTAIN AVENUE ACCORDING TO CITY OF
PHOENIX STANDARD DETAIL P1258.

Exhibits
Conceptual Site Plan date stamped January 3, 2022
Conceptual Wall Plan date stamped January 3, 2022
Conceptual Wall Elevations date stamped December 23, 2021
Correspondence from the public (43 pages)




Page 612
Page 613
Page 614
Page 615
December 9, 2021

To: South Mountain Village Planning Committee

Re: Opposition to Z-58-21 and GPA-SM-3-21-8 K. Hovnanian Andora Development

K. Hovnanian Homes” proposal to build 67 single family home on the 20 acres located
on the southwest corner of 19th Avenue and West South Mountain Avenue is
inappropriate in scale, density, and character in a neighborhood that consists of homes
on lots three quarters of an acre and larger, and active agricultural uses. The proposed
Andora site plan is a perfect example of the “dominoes in a row” lots that the Rio
Montana Plan uses to illustrate what NOT to build.

During an informational meeting held on December 7, K. Hovanian Homes’
representative, Chuck Chisholm”, admitted that he had never read the Rio Montana
Plan. After that statement, it was impossible to find credible his arguments that
Andora would benefit the neighborhood and was compatible with neighborhood
character.

Judging from linear grid site plan presented it is probable that Harrington Planning +
Design, the project’s designers, have never read the Rio Montana Plan either. The site
plan appears to have one overriding design factor: crowd as many lots as possible onto
the site, resulting in an unimaginative, generic “cookie cutter” subdivision that would
not enhance the character of the surrounding neighborhood.

The proposed Andora development would cut through the middle of a cohesive,
community, destroying the unique blend of homes on R1-18 and larger lots and small
specialty farms and tree nurseries which a define the character of our neighborhood.
The South Mountain Village Character Plan states that new development should
“[p]romote neighborhood identity through planning that reinforces the existing
landscaping and character of the area. Each new development should contribute to the
character identified for the village.” Our neighborhood character is spacious, diverse,
and green. The proposed Andora development is crowded, dominated by sameness,
and urban.

The Rio Montana Plan states on p. 22 that
The goal of any site plan should be sensitive to the surrounding area. This
includes the environment, to the existing development, the history of a place
and to the dreams of the community for the future.

A site plan for new development should consider not only the site and its
attributes, but also the larger context in which the site is located.




Page 616
The proposed Andora development does not respect the existing neighborhood
character, is inconsistent with the goals of the South Mountain Village Character Plan,
and disregards the planning and design guidelines of the Rio Montana Plan.

I respectfully ask the Committee Not to approve either the GPA or zoning change for
this project.




Dorothy M. Hallock
2050 W. South Mountain Ave.
Phoenix, AZ 85041




Page 617
From: Norberto
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8" in your subject line.
Date: Friday, December 10, 2021 4:54:25 PM


I live in the neighborhood and oppose the development as is proposed...

NORBERTO RIVERA




Page 618
From: Steven & Rebekah Higginbotham
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola; Council District 8 PCC
Subject: I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8
Date: Sunday, December 12, 2021 7:49:13 AM


I live near 19th Avenue and South Mountain and I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8
(aka the Andora project).

I would like to request time on the SMVPC agenda for Tuesday, December 14, 2021, at 6:00
p.m. and to then yield that time to Zach Brooks.

Best,
Rebekah




Page 619
From: Steven Higginbotham
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola; Council District 8 PCC
Subject: I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8
Date: Sunday, December 12, 2021 10:18:50 PM


I live near 19th Avenue and South Mountain and I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8
(aka the Andora project).

I would like to request time on the SMVPC agenda for Tuesday, December 14, 2021, at 6:00
p.m. and to then yield that time to Zach Brooks.

regards,
Steven Higginbotham
1804 w Magdalena Ln, Phoenix, AZ 85041




--
Steven Higginbotham




Page 620
From: Dianne Olivo
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: I/ we oppose am in Opposition of GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8
Date: Monday, December 13, 2021 11:15:01 AM




We wish to go on record as in opposition to this proposal for a number of reasons. Proven need for density increase.
Construction of another non descript Blight on pastoral agriculture.” Gardens “ may be name but not in design .
Etc as well as unacceptable address of toxic fumes from south property at 8811 S 19th Ave .

We have invested well over 1.5 million in our properties and maintaining the historic nature of this horse property.
No need to change zoning especially for financial doubling!
Ted and Dianne Olivo
8804 S 19th Ave and
8624 S 19th Ave




Page 621
From: Erin Hegedus
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: Re: I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8
Date: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 5:14:23 AM
Attachments: image001.png


I would like to add a comment that I signed a petition in August which was misrepresented to
me. I was in favor of upscale housing that followed The Rio Montana plan. Not this plan and I
resent the misrepresentation

Sent from my iPad


On Dec 13, 2021, at 6:47 PM, Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola gaxiola@phoenix.gov> wrote:



Thanks Erin, I will add this as well.

Have a great evening,

Enrique Bojórquez Gaxiola
Planner III
Planning & Development Department
Long Range Planning Division
200 W. Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Office: (602) 262-6949




***I am currently working remotely on a rotational schedule, but will be checking voicemails
multiple times per day. Please feel free to leave me a voice message or email me for a
more timely response. Thank you.***




From: Erin Hegedus
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 6:46 PM
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: RE: I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8

Thank you. I forgot to include my address:

8630 South 19th Avenue

Sent from Mail [go.microsoft.com] for Windows


Page 622
From: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 6:37 PM
To: Erin Hegedus
Subject: RE: I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8

Good evening Erin,

How are you? Thank you for providing this statement (below) regarding these two
cases. I will add this to the case file and will share it with the South Mountain VPC
ahead of our meeting tomorrow evening.

If questions arise, please contact me.

Regards,

Enrique Bojórquez Gaxiola
Planner III
Planning & Development Department
Long Range Planning Division
200 W. Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Office: (602) 262-6949




***I am currently working remotely on a rotational schedule, but will be checking voicemails
multiple times per day. Please feel free to leave me a voice message or email me for a
more timely response. Thank you.***




From: Erin Hegedus
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 6:33 PM
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8

Three years ago this plan was presented and the South Mountain Village Planning
Council objected to it.

We are here again to oppose this development. It has actually become even more
disturbing than originally presented because the developer is known for developing low
income housing, is not familiar with the Rio Montana Plan, stated that they are not
interested in building energy efficient homes and has not offered to the neighborhood
(the one time we were able to meet with them) any reason why we would this high



Page 623
density development would enhance our neighborhood.

The developer basically told our group on 12/6 that they are looking to build to meet
their profit margin.

Again, this is an out of state developer with no ties to the community. Additionally,
there has been no traffic plan conducted and the infrastructure does not support the
current traffic, let alone the addition of this development.

I ask that the council oppose this plan.

Our neighborhood cannot manage more traffic, more noise, more heat and a builder
that is just looking to make a fast buck, and our community is left behind to live with
this destruction of a beautiful and unique neighborhood.




Sent from Mail [go.microsoft.com] for Windows




Page 624
From: Patti Trites
To: Tamala Daniels; Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola; trentchristopher@gmail.com
Cc: Marcia Busching; twanna.bhna@yahoo.com; Greg Brownell; edward@yourgreatestself.com; Adriana Garcia
Maximiliano
Subject: Andora - Z-58-21-8 and GPA-SM-3-21-8
Date: Monday, December 13, 2021 12:01:49 PM


Dear Enrique,

I would like to register to speak at tomorrow's SMVPC Meeting.

I would also like to speak for Agenda Item # 8 & 9 for Z-58-21-8 companion case GPA-SM-
3-21-8
- Thank you in advance for contacting the Maricopa County Flood Control District and
looking at the flood maps of this property.
Housing placement is important in relation to any water flows that enter/exit the new
proposed community.
There has been reported flooding in that intersection of 19th Avenue and South Mountain.
Please adhere to the new COP Planning and Development Guidelines and overlay the new
proposed lots with the FLO-2D mapping of the area done by MCFCD. NOTE: An approved
Preliminary Plot is not a guarantee of the total number of lots allowed by the COP until D&G
is approved.

- 19th Avenue is unique and special in the City. It is a destination and marketed that
way by the City and State.
19th Avenue is the entrance to the South Mountain Trailhead: 19th Ave. (Ma-Ha-Tauk)
Trailhead at 10484 S. 19th Ave.
This is a HUGE marketing and benefit to the developer and future homeowners.
Per the COP own site: At more than 16,000 acres, South Mountain Park/Preserve is one of
the largest municipally managed parks in the nation and consists
of three mountain ranges - the Ma Ha Tauk, Gila and Guadalupe. The park boasts more
than 50 miles of trails for hiking, horseback riding and mountain
biking. Additionally, the roadways throughout the park are a favorite for bicyclists.

- Safety and the beauty of South Mountain should be maintained as new development
happens in the area.
Many people - residents and visitors - utilize 19th Avenue as their entrance onto South
Mountain Trailhead.
Keep it safe. Do not allow entrance or exits onto 19th avenue for new developments.
PLEASE keep the entrance and exit off of 19th avenue. Please move it to South
Mountain Avenue.
- Flood Control and COP are also planning on a 66" storm drain pipe and catch basins
along 19th Avenue to South Mountain.
Keep 19th Avenue free of resident traffic as possible for safety.

- Please keep the South Mountain Area looking complementary to its surroundings;
Avoid block walls 'prison' effect around the new communities.
- Please include plenty of plants/trees and Decorative Iron Fencing to surround the new
developments.
- Please include green spaces on the interior and exterior of the property.
The developer will gain $$ due to the location of this land and can make up the housing


Page 625
loss with the location premium.


Thank you.

Patti Trites
Homeowner in South Mountain
President of Southern Hills HOA

Cell: 402 213 7126
Email: pattihoash@gmail.com




Page 626
From: Ravi Sharma
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Cc: Ravi Sharma
Subject: I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8
Date: Monday, December 13, 2021 4:07:32 PM


Hello Mr. Bojorquez-gaxiola,

I live in the neighborhood and oppose the development as is proposed.

Thanks,

Dr. Sharma




Page 627
From: Ravi Sharma
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Cc: ushma sharma
Subject: I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8
Date: Monday, December 13, 2021 4:10:22 PM


Hello Mr. Bojorquez-gaxiola,

I live in the neighborhood and oppose the development as is proposed.

Thanks,

Mrs. Sharma




Page 628
From: Dean Chiarelli
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: December 14: SMVPC Meeting
Date: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 11:45:32 AM
Attachments: Outlook-rmpvn2ah.png
Outlook-o00zkkho.png


Mr. Bojorquez-Gaxiola:
I have been a South Mountain resident and homeowner for 9.5 years. I registered for the
South Mountain Village Planning Committee meeting on December 14th and would like to
comment if possible. In case I cannot speak, I’m documenting my opposition to three
rezoning items. The Committee should disapprove rezoning to increase the number of
residential units. The proposed changes will cause excessive vehicle traffic and congestion on
the local streets. The new homes currently under construction in the surrounding area are
not even fully built yet, and there is already much traffic at the intersection where 19th
Avenue meets Dobbins Road. Many of the streets in the rezoning area were built as "country
roads" -- not meant for higher-density residential developments. In the future, there should
be a new traffic study when the latest homes along the Dobbins corridor (7th Avenue to Loop
202) are occupied.
The right developers for this land should integrate their plans within the current zoning. The
South Mountain area is a unique and historic location, and it is quickly becoming a generic
bedroom community with roads not built to meet the needs of higher-volume residential
developments.
_____________________________________________
Z-31-21-8 (Companion Case GPA-SM-2-21-8)- OPPOSE
GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8)- OPPOSE
Z-58-21-8 (Companion Case GPA-SM-3-21-8)- OPPOSE
_____________________________________________
Dean Chiarelli, Mobile phone 702-994-8077
Dean Chiarelli, MA, RDN, CEP, CHES, REHS
Clinical Assistant Professor



500 North 3rd Street | Phoenix, AZ 85004
Ph: 602.496.1867 | dean.chiarelli@asu.edu
https://nursingandhealth.asu.ed [nursingandhealth.asu.edu]




Page 629
Opposition to Cases GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8
Agenda items 7 and 8

The proposed Andora development is nearly identical to a development application of the same
name this committee voted against 10-2 in 2018. I and many of my neighbors oppose the
development as submitted for reasons outlined here.




Andora 2018




Andora 2021

This development does not conform to the Phoenix General Plan or the Rio Montana Plan as it
applies to our area.

Our area consists of:
RURAL CHARACTER
CUSTOM HOMES
LARGE LOTS
FARMS AND EQUESTRIAN PROPERTIES
RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE

Rural Character
We are a community of S-1 and R1-18 homes and properties. We purchased property in this
area, as did our neighbors, for the large lots, open space, and the quiet rural character we
currently enjoy. We know that the area will develop, and we support low density development
that preserves and enhances our rural character, and protects certainty and character as




Page 630
outlined in the Phoenix General Plan. We support housing designs and site planning that
conforms to the Rio Montana guidelines for our area: low density, rural, open spaces, staggered
lots, houses with alley garage entrances/side entrances.

The proposed density, cookie-cutter, garage-scaped housing designs of the Andora project, is
incompatible in scale and design and existing use to the surrounding area. It was incompatible
in 2018 and remains so today.

This area is swiftly losing its S-1 and R1-18 land as is the rest of the Valley. There is plenty of R1-
10 and higher density all around. Once lower density land is lost, it’s gone forever. Please
preserve what remains for future homeowners to enjoy what we already do.




Traffic
The increase in traffic along 19th Ave. and West South Mountain Ave. poses serious hazard to
existing residents. 19th Ave. is not an arterial street south of Baseline. It hasn’t had a traffic
count since 2012 and the area has seen exponential increase in development. West South
Mountain Ave. hasn’t had a traffic count since 2013 and narrows to one lane just west of the
proposed development. Tractors and other farm equipment regularly use both roadways. A
traffic report is warranted for the safety of the existing neighbors, and any future residents.

Flooding
Street flooding, esp. on the west side of 19th Ave. at W. South Mountain Ave. is particularly
dangerous. There is no timeline for approved flood mitigation by the city. Until that is in place,
development should favor low density.




Page 631
The photo below is just off the intersection at 19th Ave. and W. South Mountain Ave. on the
west side. The water is runoff from the park and when it comes down 19th Ave. it banks left and
has been so powerful it has bent steel fence posts.




K. Hovanian
A representative for K. Hovanian hosted an initial virtual presentation Oct. 20. The
neighborhood told them it was too dense, there were flooding issues, etc. There was little
contact afterwards until their lawyers arranged an in-person presentation Dec. 7. At that
meeting, Chuck Chisolm, Director of Planning and Entitlement, presented us with a slightly
revised plan with a density reduction of 5 houses. We brought up flooding issues, density, etc.
again. We asked questions about working with us to reduce the density, using more
appropriate housing designs for the area, etc. His response was that this is what K. Hovanian
does, and they really don’t deviate. It was basically, the same pitch line we kept getting from
Scott Ward in 2018, “Trust me, you’ll love it (but I’m not going to change it if you don’t).”

Mr. Chisolm, when asked, said, “I’ve heard of the Rio Montana Plan.” He admitted he has not
looked at it. It appears neither he nor his team have acquainted themselves with the area’s
design guidelines, which is witnessed by the poor site plan, and the housing styles submitted.
What else about the area, about the South Mountain Village Plan, have they not studied to
better build here?

Summary
This plan is not appropriate, and this builder is not appropriate for the unique character of the
area.
Please vote no on both cases.

Sincerely,




Page 632
Jewel Clark
2020 West South Mountain Ave.
Phoenix, AZ 85041

--
H. Jewel Clark
hjewelclark@fastmail.com




Page 633
From: JoAnne Jensen
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8 - Andora - Opposition
Date: Monday, December 13, 2021 7:43:57 PM


Hello -

I am writing to oppose the requests to modify the general plan and rezone the parcel in question for
the development of tract housing.

In the first place, outreach by developers is required, but there has only been a single meeting - last
week - for neighbors to hear the proposal. In most cases, at the very least, more time would be
needed for further discussions; however, this developer made it very clear that they are not
interested in engaging in any discussion that does not include changing the density to R1-10 zoning.
In fact, the developer reported that the land is being held in escrow, and that they would walk away
from the deal if the parcel is not approved for R1-10 zoning. This is the attitude of a public company,
whose headquarters is many states away, and which does not have any particular interest in
providing value for the South Mountain neighborhood. When asked, they could not identify one
feature which they would bring value to this area.

In the second place, the developer did agree to review their site plan, given that their proposal is
very nearly identical to the one which was rejected by the South Mountain Village Planning
Committee several years ago. However, again, this will be the proverbial finger puzzle exercise
rather than engaging in honest dialog aimed toward identifying a compromise reasonable for both
the neighbors and the developer.

In the third place, inasmuch as the developer has stated firmly that there is no way they will
entertain density less than 3.5 units / acre, problems with congestion, traffic safety, and noise will
abound.

In the fourth place, their plan for the expansion of South Mountain, on the northern boundary of
Andora, is physically impossible to achieve - given that there would be a sidewalk, an all use bridle
path, and an additional lane installed.

In sum, they know the current zoning, and are willing to ask the City to change it. Why are their
interests any more important than the interests of those of us who have already made the
investment of money and time, and who make this community unique? We all chose to become
part of South Mountain because we were told, promised, that farm property which would become
housing would be rezoned to R1-18 so we could retain as much a rural and unusual flavor as possible
- is that promise unreliable?

Please add me to the list of many neighbors who request that the South Mountain Village Planning
Committee reject this proposal.

Thank you.




Page 634
JoAnne Jensen
8303 S.17th Drive (Magdalena Estates)
Phoenix AZ 85041
480-213-6499




Page 635
Racelle Escolar

From: Dean Chiarelli
Sent: Monday, January 3, 2022 5:24 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: SMVPC Meeting January 6th - Opposition Notice



ToSouthMountainVillagePlanningCommittee:

Re:MeetingThursday,January6th

Iamstronglyopposedtotheitemsindicatedbelowandrequesttospeak.

CasenumbersGPAͲSMͲ3Ͳ21Ͳ8andZͲ58Ͳ21Ͳ8(Agendaitems2and3).
CasenumbersGPAͲSMͲ2Ͳ21Ͳ8andZͲ31Ͳ21Ͳ8(Agendaitems8and9).

Iamopposedtotheitemsbecauseofexcessivecongestiononsurfaceroads.TheSMVPCisauthorizing
excessiveapprovalsofrezoningintheareaintandemwithalackofnewculturalamenities/businessesto
enhancequalityoflifeinthearea.Theruralcharacteroftheareaisrapidlychangingfortheworst,andthisis
againsttheCityofPhoenixplanningcodesandFoodPlanforSouthPhoenix.Irespectfullyrequestanupdated
trafficstudywhichincludesactivityforhomescurrentlyunderconstructionintheDobbinsCorridor.Thereare
newhomesalongDobbinsRoadfrom16thStreetallthewaytotheLoop202whicharen'tevenbuiltyetthat
willincreasethecongestion.

IalsowanttoexpressconcerntheChairoftheCommitteestatedintheDecember2021meetingthatsheisa
RealtorwhogrewupinSouthPhoenix.ThereisanappearanceofbiastowardsapprovalofhigherͲdensity
residentialzoningforwhichtheChairmaypersonallybenefit.

Dean Chiarelli, MA, RDN, CEP, CHES, REHS 
Clinical Assistant Professor



500 North 3rd Street | Phoenix, AZ 85004 
Ph: 602.496.1867 | dean.chiarelli@asu.edu
https://nursingandhealth.asu.ed[nursingandhealth.asu.edu]




 




Page1 636
Racelle Escolar

From: Erin Hegedus
Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 5:44 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 8 PCC; Adriana Garcia Maximiliano
Subject: Z-58-21-8 and GPA-SM-3-21-8



Iamwritingtoopposethereferencedrequests.Thedeveloperisaskingtomodifycurrentzoningwithoutregardtothe
impactoftheneighborhood.

Theimpactofthiszoningmodificationisextremelyharmfultothecharacterandsafetyofthiscommunity.

Theinfrastructuredoesnotsupportthisnorseveralofdevelopmentsunderconsideration.Theroadsarealready
congestedanddangerous.Therearealsoconcerntotheheatislandthisandotherswillcause.

TherearemanyneighborhoodsintheSouthPhoenixareathatthisdevelopercanutilizethatwillnotfundamentally
changeanddisruptthecharacterofthisuniquecommunity.

Regards,

ErinHegedus,CMRP
8630South19thAvenue
Phoenix,AZ85041

SentfromMail[go.microsoft.com]forWindows





Page1 637
Racelle Escolar

From: H. Jewel Clark
Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 6:08 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Letter of opposition GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8



IamwritinginoppositiontoGPAͲSMͲ3Ͳ21Ͳ8andZͲ58Ͳ21Ͳ8(Agendaitems2and3)ascurrentlysubmittedandapprove
ofthecontinuancevotedonattheDec.14SMVPC.

IamdisappointedtosayK.Hovnanianhasshownzerointerestinworkingwiththeneighborhoodtotryandreachany
compromiseonourcoreoppositionofdensity.Wehaveyettoseeiftheywillworkwithusonadditionalheatmitigation
andbetterhousingdesign.Theirstancehassofarbeen,"Thisiswhatwedo."WeareworkingwiththeViceMayortotry
andfindsomemiddlegroundandwillhopefullyseesomemovementbeforethenextSMVPCmeeting.
Sincerely,
JewelClark
2020W.SouthMountainAve.
Phoenix,AZ85041
ͲͲ
H.JewelClark
hjewelclark@fastmail.com






Page1 638
Racelle Escolar

From: JoAnne Jensen
Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 5:18 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Adriana Garcia Maximiliano; Council District 8 PCC
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8 / Andora



Helloandthankyoufortakingmycomments.

MynameisJoAnneJensen,ouraddressis8303So.17thDrive,PhoenixAZ85041;thisisinMagdalenaEstates,whichis
onthenortheastcorneroftheintersectionof19thAvenueandSouthMountain,atadiagonaltotheparcelunder
considerationinthetworequestsnamedabove.

ThesetworequestsappearonyouragendaunderContinuancesandWithdrawals.Iwouldabsolutelysupporteither
actionregardingbothrequests.Thecurrentproposalisunacceptabletotheneighbors,whohaveofferedconstructive
criticismandsuggestionsforthedeveloper’sconsideration;however,acontinuationwouldsupportpotentialfurther
discussionsbetweenthedevelopersandtheneighbors–followingtwofacetofacemeetings.

Iamalsosigninguptospeakonthisissue,andwouldyieldmytimetoZachBrooks.

Againthankyou.

JoAnneJensen
Cell–480Ͳ213Ͳ6499
Email–joannejensen@cox.net





Page1 639
Racelle Escolar

From: Mike Josic
Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 6:09 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8



DearPlanningCommisionMembers,

IopposebothagendaitemsGPAͲSMͲ3Ͳ21Ͳ8andZͲ58Ͳ21Ͳ8andsupportacontinuationtoallowforfurtherdiscussion
betweenthedeveloperandtheneighborhood.Mypropertyisdirectlyacrossthestreetfromthissite.

Thankyou,

MikeJosic
2020W.SouthMountainAve
PhoenixAZ85041




Page1 640
From: Steven & Rebekah Higginbotham
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola; Council District 8 PCC
Subject: I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8)
Date: Monday, January 10, 2022 9:50:27 AM


Hi Enrique,

I'm sorry for the delay, I think I missed the deadline but am sending in case it's not too late...


I live near 19th Avenue and South Mountain. I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-
58-21-8, aka the Andora project) and want to donate my speaking time to Zach Brooks.

I would like to request time on the SMVPC agenda for January 11 and to then yield that time
to Zach Brooks.

Best,
Rebekah




Page 641
Racelle Escolar

From: Steven & Rebekah Higginbotham
Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 4:14 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 8 PCC; adriana.garcia.maximilliano@phoenix.gov
Subject: I support continuance for cases GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8



Ilivenear19thAvenueandSouthMountainandIsupportcontinuanceforcasesGPAͲSMͲ3Ͳ21Ͳ8andZͲ58Ͳ21Ͳ8,while
opposingthedevelopmentitself(akatheAndoraproject)onthefollowinggrounds:thecurrentlysubmittedstipulations
areinadequateforthesafetyandqualityoflifeofthiscommunity.

IwouldliketorequesttimeonthePlanningCommissionagendaforThursday,January6andtothenyieldthattimeto
ZachBrooks.

Best,
Rebekah




Page1 642
Racelle Escolar

From: Ravi Sharma
Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 5:03 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Council District 8 PCC; adriana.garcia.maximilliano@phoenix.gov
Subject: Item # 2 and Case # GPA-SM-3-21-8, Item #3 and Case # Z-58-21-8, Item # 8 and Case #GPA-SM-2-21-8
(Continued from 12/2/2021), Item # 9 and Case #



ZͲ31Ͳ21Ͳ8(Continuedfrom12/2/2021)


Weareopposedtotheproposedchanges.

Dr.RaviandMrs.SnigdhaSharma






Page1 643
Racelle Escolar

From: Steven Higginbotham
Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 4:14 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 8 PCC; adriana.garcia.maximilliano@phoenix.gov
Subject: I support continuance for cases GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8



Ilivenear19thAvenueandSouthMountainandIsupportcontinuanceforcasesGPAͲSMͲ3Ͳ21Ͳ8andZͲ58Ͳ21Ͳ8,while
opposingthedevelopmentitself(akatheAndoraproject)onthefollowinggrounds:thecurrentlysubmittedstipulations
areinadequateforthesafetyandqualityoflifeofthiscommunity.

IwouldliketorequesttimeonthePlanningCommissionagendaforThursday,January6andtothenyieldthattimeto
ZachBrooks.


ͲͲ
StevenHigginbotham







Page1 644
From: Dean Chiarelli
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: SMVPC Meeting January 11th
Date: Friday, January 7, 2022 4:15:59 PM
Attachments: Outlook-5rax1jrd.png
Outlook-m4mhurz5.png


Re: GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8)
I oppose both cases and request to speak about both items.
I have been a homeowner and resident in South Phoenix for 10 years. I oppose the amendment to
the General Plan Land Use and Rezoning. Andora is a generic housing development that will
produce higher-density problems (traffic, congestion, reduced emergency vehicle access on one-
lane roads). It will reduce the availability of premium land with a high potential for use in
agricultural business such as “agritainment”. It will increase heat, thereby impacting an
environmentally-sensitive area used for farming.
Approving Andora confounds the PlanPHX (2015), which promotes land use for healthy & grocery
stores, urban farms, community gardens, and agricultural businesses such as the Farm at South
Mountain. Harm will occur to codes and ordinances that eliminate barriers towards developing a
healthy food infrastructure.
Furthermore, citing the 2025 Food Action Plan, I strongly oppose amending and rezoning prime land
currently well-suited for an “agritainment” zoning district that permits uses and accessory uses for
primary agricultural use. The Grandma's Farm™, and the Farm at South Mountain™ are great
examples of the type of enterprises I advocate for. The SMVPC should prioritize & value prime land
as best used for development such as the AZ Fresh Food and Innovation Hub in the Rio Salado area.
During the last meeting, I asked a general question to all Planning Committee.
“How will you know how much amending and rezoning is too much”?
I am Pro-Development. I firmly believe the right developer(s) will be able to profit without the need
to amend and rezone this land in a way that will inevitably reduce the quality of life for existing
residents.
The Village Planning Committee handbook, on pages 6 -8, identifies some key points to consider for
land use map amendments and rezoning.
Is there a conflict between the proposed land use and physical constraints or the environmental
sensitivity of the area?
Yes, the issue is well-documented with increased traffic, increased heat, flooding problems, and
reduced capacity for emergency vehicles restricted by one-lane roads (19th Avenue and Dobbins
Road). The impact of emergency vehicles should not be under-estimated. The project has only one
entry.

How does the proposed change affect the underlying character of the area?
Yes, there is a demonstrated negative impact to access the 19th Avenue Trail in South Mountain park
because of increased congestion, traffic, reduced views, loss of space in the surrounding areas.

Does the proposed land use have any positive or negative impacts on goals and policies within the
general plan?
Yes, there is a negative impact because it reduces the capacity to carry out the portions of PlanPHX
(2015) and the 2025 Food Action Plan.
The opportunity cost for this land is too high. The SMVPC has approved an excessive amount of
amending & rezoning for increased residential density, and at the same time, an absence of exciting
& appealing businesses which embody the unique character and rural appeal. Phoenix is poised to
be an agricultural hub and food innovation center. The South Mountain Village (District 8) is ideally


Page 645
suited to be part of this longer-term infrastructure. These case items have many oppositions from
the community and should NOT be approved.
Sincerely,

Dean Chiarelli


Dean Chiarelli, MA, RDN, CEP, CHES, REHS
Clinical Assistant Professor



500 North 3rd Street | Phoenix, AZ 85004
Ph: 602.496.1867 | dean.chiarelli@asu.edu
https://nursingandhealth.asu.ed [nursingandhealth.asu.edu]




Page 646
From: H. Jewel Clark
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: Opposition to GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8 (agenda items 8 and 9)
Date: Friday, January 7, 2022 4:51:56 PM


I am writing to oppose applicant case numbers GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8 (agenda items
8 and 9).

I am sorry to report that since the last SMVPC meeting, the applicant, K Hovnanian, has been
unwilling to work with the neighborhood on any changes to this project, specifically in regards
to density, which is entirely inappropriate for our area. While the Kimura development
approved across the street, sadly, is also entirely inappropriate for our area, the developer has
nevertheless worked to reduce that density and we are in continuing negotiations to work out
additional heat mitigation and sustainable/green building for the site.

This developer is just Scott Ward all over again, who we opposed at this location in 2018 with
the same density and the same unwillingness to do anything to accommodate the existing
neighbors. K Hovanian's attitude is, just like Scott Ward's was, "Trust me, you'll love it." Mr.
Chisolm, to his credit, has been completely open about not budging. He represents a national
home builder and they have their way of doing things. The message we are getting is: our only
tool a hammer, so all our builds need to be nails. No deviation.

This is not what our area is about. We are a diverse, unique mix of custom homes, active
farmland, horse properties and R1-18 small developments. Any developer who wants to build
in our area should work with existing neighbors to craft a design and density that is "livable"
for those who already live there. If development has to happen, we support a density at R1-18,
particularly since it borders 2 active farming properties. The current plan, with the entrance
back on W. South Mountain Ave., and the density and cookie-cutter lots proposed are
anathema for us.

Please do not approve either the GPA or the zoning request. Thank you.
Jewel Clark
2020 W. South Mountain Ave.
Phoenix, AZ

--
H. Jewel Clark
hjewelclark@fastmail.com




Page 647
From: Bryan Martin
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Cc: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: Meeting time deferral GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8).
Date: Sunday, January 9, 2022 5:29:51 PM




> Hello
>
> I appose GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8) and want to donate my speaking time to Zach Brooks.
>
> Warm thanks
> Bryan Martin
> 602-909-0948
>
> **** Please hold me harmless against any and all opinions that were presented here as facts. However shocking
they may seem, just know that they are fueled by excitement and shared with love. Warm thanks in advance. ****




Page 648
From: Dorothy Hallock
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: Opposition to GPA-SM-3-21 and Z-58-22-8 KHovnanian Andora
Date: Sunday, January 9, 2022 11:54:23 AM




I am opposed to a General Plan Amendment and Rezoning for the above project.
Please give my speaking time to Zach Brooks at the SMVPC meeting.
Thank you
Dorothy Hallock

Sent from my iPhone




Page 649
From: Leticia Rivera
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8
Date: Sunday, January 9, 2022 5:07:41 PM


Hello Mr. Bojórquez-Gaxiola,

I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8) and want to donate my speaking time
to Zach Brooks.

Leticia Rivera
1716 W. Magdalena Ln
Phoenix, AZ 85041




Page 650
From: Mike Josic
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Cc: Mike Josic
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Companion Case Z-58-21-8 Opposition
Date: Sunday, January 9, 2022 7:55:44 PM


Hi Enrigue,
Please register my opposition and speaking time.
I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Companion Case Z-58-21-8 and want to donate my
speaking time to Zach Brooks.

Thank you,

Mike Josic




Page 651
From: Norberto
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: Fw: City of Phoenix - Update on case GPA-SM-3-21-8
Date: Sunday, January 9, 2022 6:52:35 PM


I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8) and want to donate my speaking time
to Zach Brooks"
Thank you

Norberto Rivera
1716 w Magdalena ln
Phx 85041




Page 652
From: Ravi Sharma
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Cc: Ravi Sharma; zach@zbrooks.com
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8)
Date: Sunday, January 9, 2022 5:15:52 PM


I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8) and want to donate my speaking
time to Zach Brooks.

Thanks,


Ravi Sharma




Page 653
From: Snigdha Sharma
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Cc: Ushma-email; zach@zbrooks.com
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8)
Date: Sunday, January 9, 2022 5:08:01 PM


I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8) and want to donate my speaking time
to Zach Brooks

Thanks,

Mrs. Snigdha Sharma




Page 654
From: Steven Higginbotham
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola; Council District 8 PCC
Subject: I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8)
Date: Monday, January 10, 2022 9:49:52 AM


I live near 19th Avenue and South Mountain. I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-
58-21-8, aka the Andora project) and want to donate my speaking time to Zach Brooks.

I would like to request time on the SMVPC agenda for January 11 and to then yield that time
to Zach Brooks.


--
Steven Higginbotham




Page 655
From: JoAnne Jensen
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: GPA-SM-3-32-8 and companion case Z-58-21-8 / Opposition Comments
Date: Monday, January 10, 2022 11:12:34 AM


Hello and good morning -

Please forward my opposition comments with respect to the cases cited above to the South
Mountain Village Planning Committee ahead of their meeting tomorrow evening.

Our neighborhood group has met twice with the developer, who has been consistent in not
accommodating or directly responding to our concerns. We do not oppose residential development,
however, we do believe that maintaining the rural / agricultural / equestrian nature of this part of
Phoenix demands the lower density of R1-18 zoning.

Beyond that, the streets in question - 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue - are largely
unimproved and are woefully inadequate to safely handle the current amount of traffic much less
cars from a densely populated development. There have been collisions, including a fatality, at the
uncontrolled intersection of these two streets.

Please vote to oppose the developer's plan which offers no benefit or improvement to this
community.

Thank you.

JoAnne Jensen
8303 S. 17th Drive
Phoenix AZ   85041
480-213-6499




Page 656
Page 657
REVISED PETITION (AFTER PREVIOUS STAFF REPORT)




Page 658




@
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Page 659
Attachment D




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-58-21-8

Date of VPC Meeting January 11, 2022
Request From S-1, Approved R1-18
Request To R1-10
Proposed Use Single-family residential community

Location Southwest corner of 19th Avenue and South Mountain
Avenue
VPC Recommendation Denial

VPC Vote 9-4-1 Motion passed; Members Alvarez, Brownell,
Coleman, Holmerud, Ray, Said, Smith, Viera, and
Marchuk in favor; Busching, Greathouse, Shepard and
Daniels in dissent. Member Aldama abstained.

VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

Cases GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8 were heard concurrently.

Seventeen members of the public registered to speak in opposition to this item.

Enrique Bojórquez, staff, introduced himself and provided a presentation for the
Minor General Plan amendment case GPA-SM-3-21-8 and concurrent rezoning
case Z-58-21-8. He discussed the location of the site, noting surrounding land
uses, existing General Plan Land Use map designations, and the proposed
designation on the site. He discussed the existing zoning in the area and
requested zoning for the site. He showed the conceptual site plan provided by
the applicant as part of the Addendum A staff report, and also showed a new
version of the site plan provided by the applicant following this latest addendum
to the staff report. He indicated vehicular access points, lot distribution, building
height limitations, and lot widths proposed. The applicant also provided a wall
elevation and wall plan exhibit following the Addendum A staff report. These
were shown and discussed. He concluded the presentation by providing a staff
recommendation of approval for both cases but noted that the if the committee
chose to approve case Z-58-21-8 per the latest site plan, wall plan and wall
elevations provided by the applicant, that stipulation numbers 1, 6, 9 and 9.E
would need to be modified from what was presented in the Addendum A staff
report. He discussed the stipulation modifications that would be required.




Page 660
Cassandra Ayres, with Beus Gilbert and McGroder PLLC, introduced herself as
the applicant and discussed the location of the site. She discussed the proposed
Minor General Plan Amendment and requested zoning. She discussed the latest
proposed site plan following the Addendum A staff report, and changes made
from the previous site plan. She discussed the goals and policies from the
General Plan, Rio Montaña Area Plan, and Housing Phoenix Plan. She
concluded the presentation by requesting approval of the project.

Twanna Ray inquired on the door-to-door outreach conducted and neighborhood
notification. She asked if a virtual neighborhood meeting had been conducted.

Ms. Ayres discussed the outreach conducted and stated that both in-person and
virtual neighborhood meetings had been conducted.

Ms. Ray asked on the proposed price-point on the homes.

Ms. Ayres stated that the homes are currently estimated between $500,000 and
$600,000 each.

Mr. Arthur Greathouse inquired about traffic and how pedestrians will be
affected.

Ms. Ayres stated that the project will provide street improvements, in addition to
trails and sidewalks.

Vice Chair Marchuk asked if a community benefit agreement was entered.

Ms. Ayres responded that no agreements were planned.

Emma Viera asked how the developer was addressing the Climate Action Plan.

Ms. Ayres stated that the project was providing smaller streets, shade trees, and
other elements. She is happy to work with the Office of Heat Response and
Mitigation on tree selection for this community.

Fatima Said asked if the applicant is looking into changes into the open space
areas where turf is shown. She asked if a community garden had been
considered.

Ms. Ayres responded that a garden had been considered, but some of the
community members did not support this amenity.

Vice Chair Marchuk asked if a community benefit agreement was under
consideration.




Page 661
Ms. Ayres responded that no agreements were planned at this time.

Chairwoman Daniels has noticed that when community gardens get planted,
these are not maintained over time.

Ms. Viera asked how this development is bringing change to South Phoenix.

Ms. Ayres and Mr. Chuck Chisholm, with KHovnanian Homes, discussed street
improvements and infrastructure proposed.

Chairwoman Daniels asked for additional questions from the committee. She
then opened the floor for public comments on this case.

Jewel Clark, Mike Josic, Norberto Rivera, Bryan Martin, Ravi Sharma, Snighda
Sharma, Leticia Rivera, Gina Johnson, Dorothy Hallock, JoAnne Jensen, Steven
Higginbotham, Erin Hegedus, Miguel Rubio, and Robert Barnes donated their
time to Zach Brooks.

Zach Brooks, member of the public, owns the Arizona Worm Farm south of the
site. He stated that rezoning is not a right and showed a presentation on the
opposition from neighbors surrounding this site and discussed how the density
on this project will not have a big impact on the housing shortage in Phoenix. The
density proposed is not the highest and best use of the land, comparing the
proposed home values for this project with the Silva Estates subdivision west of
the site which is zoned R1-18. He mentioned that a lower density will not affect
the profitability of the project and compared costs plus profits. He stated that
most properties surrounding this site oppose the proposed development and
showed a map depicting those properties. He concluded the presentation by
showing an email from the developer on Kimura Gardens across 19th Avenue
seeking rezoning under case Z-31-21-8, stating that this project is different than
that project and has some design shortcomings. He asked for the project to be
denied based on all of these reasons.

Dean Chiarelli, member of the public, introduced himself and stated that he
supports development and requests that Chairwoman Daniels abstain from
voting due to her realtor background. He discussed previous projects involving
Ms. Daniels.

Chairwoman Daniels stated that she is willing to meet with Mr. Chiarelli and the
City Attorney to discuss this matter.

Dianne Olivo, member of the public, introduced herself and stated that the
current zoning on the property remains viable and the proposed project will
impact the area negatively. Agriculture is important and outlined the reasons why
this project is not compatible with the area.




Page 662
Lee Coleman asked which development option was used for the site plan.

Ms. Ayres responded that the Planned Residential Development (PRD) option
was used.

Ms. Ray asked Mr. Zach Brooks to outline his opposition to this project.

Mr. Brooks responded that a similar lot layout is being proposed as the previous
site plan, and other elements as discussed by the Kimura Gardens developer
who is working on case Z-31-21-8. Their project is support by some, but this
rezoning case is not well supported by the most in the community.

Vice Chair Marchuk stated that the level of opposition is clear on this project,
and the community surrounding the site are in opposition.

Mr. Zach Brooks believes that a three-quarter vote can be triggered by an
overwhelming number of properties who oppose the project.

Marcia Busching wants to hear from Mr. Brooks on what changes he can
support on this project based on the community’s input.

Mr. Brooks stated that this project differs from Kimura Gardens, and the
community asked for changes to be made on the site plan to keep the flavor and
flow of the area. He seeks R1-18 zoning on the site to protect the unique area
and asked for a denial on this case. He wants for the entrance to be located
along 19th Avenue and other changes to the layout.

Kay Shepard stated that layout could be improved, and lots rearranged. She has
always supported protecting farmland, but this type of land needs lots of water.

Edward Aldama echo’s Ms. Shepard’s comments and stated that he has visited
the site. He feels this is a viable proposal because there are other similar projects
in the area.

Ms. Busching asked if the applicant would consider a continuance on the
rezoning case.

Ms. Ayres responded that the applicant prefers a recommendation this evening.

Ms. Ray prefers that the VPC give a recommendation on the cases.

Vice Chair Marchuk asked if the committee could deny the R1-10 zoning and
approve it as R1-18 instead.




Page 663
Mr. Bojórquez responded that the committee could deny the case as filed and
approve it as R1-18. However, the site has existing approved R1-18 zoning
currently that is not yet vested.

Ms. Busching is considering approving the R1-10 zoning with minimum 70-foot-
wide lots.

Ms. Ayres does not have a comment now about that.

Ms. Ray serves in the VPC to make a difference and often sees developers that
host virtual meetings only, which present an unfair advantage to the community.
We need to have a greater interest in the community.

Ms. Busching and Vice Chair Marchuk asked for staff on clarification on the
existing approved R1-18 zoning on the site.

Mr. Bojórquez discussed the existing approved R1-18 zoning currently on the
property.

Lee Coleman asked if S-1 zoning originated from the annexation of the property.

Mr. Bojórquez discussed the S-1 zoning and designations assigned to property
upon annexation.

Ms. Shepard, Mr. Brownell, and Mr. Bojórquez discussed approved zoning
and administration of this by the City.

Ashley Hare left the meeting at 9:00pm, bringing the quorum to 14 members.


MOTION – Z-58-21-8:

Ms. Ray motioned to deny case Z-58-21-8. Mr. Coleman seconded the motion.

VOTE – Z-58-21-8:

9-4-1; Members Alvarez, Brownell, Coleman, Holmerud, Ray, Said, Smith, Viera,
and Marchuk in favor; Busching, Greathouse, Shepard and Daniels in dissent.
Member Aldama abstained.


STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:

None.




Page 664
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-58-21-8

Date of VPC Meeting December 14, 2021
Request From S-1
Request To R1-10
Proposed Use Single-family residential community

Location Southwest corner of 19th Avenue and South Mountain
Avenue
VPC Recommendation Continued to the January 11, 2021 South Mountain
Village Planning Committee meeting date

VPC Vote 11-0 Motion passed; Members Aldama, Brooks, Brownell,
Busching, Coleman, Hare, Holmerud, Shepard, Viera, Marchuk
and Daniels in favor; None in dissent.
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

Cases GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8 were heard concurrently.

Nine members of the public registered to speak on this item. Eight members
registered in opposition and one neutral.

Enrique Bojórquez, staff, introduced himself and provided a presentation for the
Minor General Plan amendment case GPA-SM-3-21-8 and concurrent rezoning
case Z-58-21-8. He discussed the location of the site, noting surrounding land
uses, existing General Plan Land Use map designations, and the proposed
designation on the site. He discussed the existing zoning in the area and
requested zoning for the site. He discussed policy documents including the
General Plan and Rio Montaña Area Plan. The conceptual site plan for the
proposed single-family subdivision was shown, indicating vehicular access
points, lot distribution, building height limitations, and lot widths proposed. The
conceptual front elevations were discussed. He concluded the presentation by
providing a staff recommendation of approval for both cases and describing the
proposed stipulations for case Z-58-21-8, as presented in the staff report.

Greg Brownell asked for an explanation on why the rezoning and minor General
Plan amendment cases were being presented concurrently. Some committee
members requested for these cases to be heard separately moving forward. He
is unsure if this is due to staff incompetence or laziness.




Page 665
Mr. Bojórquez stated that rezoning and minor General Plan amendment cases
can run on a concurrent hearing schedule if approved by the Planning and
Development Department Director.

Paul Gilbert, with Beus Gilbert and McGroder PLLC, introduced himself as the
applicant and discussed the location of the site. He discussed the proposed
Minor General Plan Amendment and requested zoning. He discussed the
previous proposed site plan which was presented in the staff report, and the
updated site plan proposed. Wall elevations were presented and discussed, in
addition to the front building elevations proposed. He discussed the goals and
policies from the General Plan and Rio Montaña Area Plan. Rezoning case
stipulations presented in the staff report were discussed and concluded the
presentation by discussing the outreach conducted on these projects.

Chairwoman Daniels asked if the committee had any questions for the applicant
or staff regarding these cases. She stated that the site plan from 2018 provided
better features than the current site plan proposed.

Chuck Chisholm, with KHovnanian Homes, discussed the updated site plan and
why this is an enhancement over what was previously proposed.

Chairwoman Daniels asked if the entrance to the community could be located
on South Mountain Avenue instead.

Mr. Gilbert stated that his team preferred to have the access point along South
Mountain Avenue, but this was moved to 19th Avenue following the feedback
from the neighborhood.

Edward Aldama stated that there should be considerations on building a
sidewalk to the trailhead further south of the site.

George Brooks asked if the Phoenix Food Action Plan had been read.

Mr. Gilbert stated that his team had read this document and actually had a
community garden planned as part of their original proposal, but some of the
neighbors asked for this to be removed. His team will consider this as they move
forward with the cases.

Vice Chair Marchuk had compared both site plans and he asked if a bus stop
along 19th Avenue was provided just like the project east of 19th Avenue. He
asked if the applicant would consider single-story home limitations and stated
that the fencing proposed along the perimeters does not feel appropriate.

Mr. Gilbert stated that a bus stop will be provided if the city requests one.




Page 666
Mr. Aldama stated that the city is growing and discussed change across the city.
He discussed view fencing proposed on another project.

Chairwoman Daniels asked for additional questions from the committee. She
then opened the floor for public comments on this case.

Donatus Agbkwu donated his time to Jewel Clark, while Rebekah ad Steven
Higginbotham donated their time to Zach Brooks.

Jewel Clark, member of the public, lives in the area and stated that she has not
seen the latest version of the site plan shown by the applicant. She showed a
presentation on the history of the site, noting a similar application filed 2018 for
the site. The use is inappropriate for the area and compared the previous site
plan from the 2018 rezoning case with the current case. She discussed customer
reviews for the home builder, property owners opposed to this case, and zoning
designations in the general area. She discussed flooding issues and described
how the project differed from the Phoenix General Plan goals. She does not
support this development.

Zach Brooks, member of the public, owns the Arizona Worm Farm south of the
site. He showed a presentation on the opposition from neighbors surrounding this
site, and history on a similar application filed 2018 for the property. He compared
the site plan with the site plan for rezoning case Z-31-21-8, across 19th Avenue,
noting requested changes to the layout, open space, lot widths and seeking a
compromise from the developer. He asked for the proposal to be rejected due to
numerous reasons and asked for site plan modifications if the project moved
forward.

Mike Josic, member of the public, introduced himself and agrees with the
comments from Ms. Clark and Mr. Brooks. He discussed the proposed site plan
and asked for a recommendation of denial on the case.

Dean Chiarelli, member of the public, introduced himself and encouraged the
committee to adhere to the General Plan Land Use Map designation and Food
Action Plan. He asked the committee to keep the promise made by the city
regarding the site.

Dianne Olivo, member of the public, introduced herself and stated that she has
invested in a historic property where she lives. If agriculture is destroyed, it
affects the entire community. She is shocked at the comments made tonight and
stated that there are other active projects by this applicant in the area.

Patti Trites, member of the public, introduced herself and described the flooding
hazard that exists in the general area. She asked that the site plan be overlaid
with the Maricopa County drainage maps. She discussed infrastructure in the




Page 667
area, discouraging access along 19th Avenue. She discussed the 2018 site plan
overlaid with the County drainage maps.

Chuck Chisholm stated that KHovnanian Homes leads the industry, and they
provide surveys to homeowners to ensure that they are satisfied with their new
homes.

Mr. Gilbert stated that flooding will be addressed with the new infrastructure and
discussed the opposition comments and discussed the feedback received from
the community. His team is willing to move the street access point to South
Mountain Avenue.

Marcia Busching stated that there have been lots of changes made which have
not been reviewed by some. She is not supportive of the project at this time.

George Brooks stated that change is up to the decision makers and agrees with
Ms. Busching.

Mr. Brownell agrees with Ms. Busching and Dr. Brooks, and no longer wishes to
vote concurrently on Minor General Plan Amendment and rezoning cases
concurrently.

Vice Chair Marchuk shares the concerns with the neighborhood. He is not
comfortable with the General Plan Amendment request and would like to see a
compromise occur following the discussion between the neighbors and applicant.

Gene Holmerud asked for clarification.

Chairwoman Daniels and Vice Chair Marchuk stated that the applicant should
address the following items:

• Edit the fencing plan proposed;
• Provide a bus stop pad along 19th Avenue;
• Limit homes to one story;
• Provide a decomposed granite trail;
• Provide more centrally located open space;
• Provide a large open space area along 19th Avenue;

Ms. Busching asked the applicant if he would accept a continuance of the
cases.

Mr. Gilbert stated that he would prefer a decision be made tonight but would be
okay with a continuance if desired by the committee on the cases.

Chairwoman Daniels requested for additional discussion or a motion.
DISCUSSION – Z-58-21-8:




Page 668
Mr. Holmerud stated that rezoning and minor General Plan Amendment cases
should not be heard concurrently.

Ms. Busching stated that minor General Plan Amendment cases could be heard
first as information only items by the VPC’s, and later accompanied by the
rezoning case at a later hearing. She added that there is an expectation that the
applicant will continue to work with members of the community and VPC
members on refining their proposal.

MOTION – Z-58-21-8:
Ms. Busching motioned to continue case Z-58-21-8 to the January 11, 2021
South Mountain Village Planning Committee meeting. Ms. Shepard seconded
the motion to continue.

VOTE – Z-58-21-8:
11-0, motion passed; Members Aldama, Brooks, Brownell, Busching, Coleman, Hare,
Holmerud, Shepard, Viera, Marchuk and Daniels in favor; None in dissent.

9-2, motion passed; Members Alvarez, Brooks, Brownell, Busching, Holmerud,
Smith, Viera, Marchuk and Daniels in favor; Members Aldama and Shepard in
dissent.


STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:

None.




Page 669
Attachment E




ADDENDUM B
Staff Report: Z-58-21-8
February 1, 2022

South Mountain Village Planning January 11, 2022
Committee Meeting Date: December 14, 2021
Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 3, 2022
January 6, 2022
Request From: S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence District),
approved R1-18 (Single-Family Residence
District) (20.76 acres)
Request To: R1-10 (Single-Family Residence District)
(20.76 acres)
Proposed Use: Detached single-family residential
Location: Southwest corner of 19th Avenue and
South Mountain Avenue
Owner: PW Again, LLC
Applicant: Paul Gilbert, Beus Gilbert McGroder, PLLC
Representative: Paul Gilbert, Beus Gilbert McGroder, PLLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations


On January 6, 2022, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to continue this case
to the February 3, 2022 Planning Commission hearing and allow the applicant to return
to the South Mountain Village Planning Committee for recommendation.

The South Mountain Village Planning Committee heard this rezoning request on
January 11, 2022 recommended denial of the request by a vote of 9 to 4 with one
abstention. Concerns discussed during this meeting by members of the South Mountain
Village Planning Committee pertained to the level of community opposition to the
project, site layout, and proposed density.

The site plan, wall plan and wall elevations attached to this addendum were submitted
by the applicant after the Addendum A Staff Report and presented at the January 11,
2022 South Mountain Village Planning Committee meeting. The changes from
Addendum A proposed in the current site plan include a decrease in the number of lots
from 66 to 63, lot width distribution, and an emergency or exit only access along 19th
Avenue.




Page 670
Addendum B to the Staff Report Z-58-21-8
February 1, 2022



Due to these changes, staff recommends modifying the following stipulations:

• Stipulation No. 1 regarding general conformance with the site plan and updates
reflected within the latest plan pertaining to lot widths and location of lots;
• Stipulation No. 6 regarding general conformance to the new proposed wall plan
and wall elevations;
• Stipulation No. 9.c. regarding a central pedestrian connection through the site;
and
• New Stipulation No. 9.E regarding pedestrian access through the development
from both 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue.

Leading up to and following the January 11, 2022 South Mountain Village Planning
Committee meeting, staff received additional correspondence from the public regarding
this case. This additional correspondence is also attached.

Staff recommends approval per the modified stipulations, reflecting updates to the site
plan, provided below:

Stipulations

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date stamped
November 22, 2021 JANUARY 3, 2022, JANUARY 11, 2022, as modified by the
following stipulations and approved by the Planning and Development Department
with specific regard to the following:

a. The development shall be limited to a maximum of 67 66 63 lots.


b. Lots 1 through 14 7, 13 THROUGH 27, AND LOTS 62 58 THROUGH 66 63
shall be a minimum of 65 feet in width.

c. Lots 15, 16, 17 and 49 8 THROUGH 13 shall be a minimum of 60 feet in
width.

d. Lots 50 14 28 through 67 28 31 AND LOT 61 shall be a minimum of 70 feet in
C. width.

e. All other lots shall be a minimum of 50 60 feet in width.
D.

f. Lots shall be a minimum of 45 feet from the southern perimeter property line.
E.




Page 671
Addendum B to the Staff Report Z-58-21-8
February 1, 2022


g. Lots shall be a minimum of 25 50 feet from the western perimeter property line.
F.

h. A minimum 10-foot wide landscape setback shall be provided along the southern
G. and western perimeter of the site.

i. The location of the open space areas.
H.

j. A minimum of 17 percent of the gross site area, exclusive of required landscape
I. setbacks, shall be provided as open space.

k. A minimum building setback of 50 feet, exclusive of fencing, entry features or
J. detached accessory structures, shall be provided along the northern and eastern
perimeter of the site along 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue.

l. A minimum 25-foot wide landscape setback shall be provided along 19th Avenue
K. and South Mountain Avenue. The landscape setback may be reduced to 20 feet
for up to 50 percent of this frontage for the purpose of staggering the perimeter
theme wall.

M. FULL INGRESS AND EGRESS TO THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE LIMITED
L. TO SOUTH MOUNTAIN AVENUE.

2. All landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 50-percent 2-inch caliper and
50-percent 3-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings, with five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

3. The maximum building height for lots 1 through 17 and lots 49 through 67, as
depicted on the site plan date stamped November 22, 2021, shall be limited to one
story and 20 22 feet.

4. All lots in the development shall be subject to Single-Family Design Review, including
lots that are wider than 65 feet, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

5. Building elevations shall be developed to the following standards, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department:

a. Building elevations shall contain multiple colors, exterior accent materials and
textural changes that exhibit quality and durability such as brick, stone, colored
textured concrete or stucco, or other materials to provide a decorative and
aesthetic treatment.


Page 672
Addendum B to the Staff Report Z-58-21-8
February 1, 2022


b. A minimum of 50 percent of the elevations for each floor plan shall provide a
covered front porch in the front yard with a minimum of 60 square feet in area at
a depth of at least six feet. No porch shall terminate within the plane of a door or
window.

c. Pitched roofs shall be provided on all primary building elevations.

6. Fences and wall are subject to the following stipulations, in addition to the Zoning
Ordinance requirements, and approved by the Planning and Development
Department. FENCES AND WALLS SHALL BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE
WITH THE SITE WALL ELEVATIONS DATE STAMPED DECEMBER 23, 2021
JANUARY 11, 2022 AND SITE WALL PLAN DATE STAMPED JANUARY 3, 2022,
JANUARY 11, 2022, AS MODIFIED BY THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS, AND
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT:

a. Full open view fencing, WHICH MAY INCLUDE SOLID COLUMNS UP TO 24
INCHES IN WIDTH, shall be utilized where walls are proposed around open
space areas adjacent to a perimeter public street.

b. Where view fencing is required by the Zoning Ordinance, a combination of solid
masonry wall and view fencing may be utilized. The solid portion of the wall shall
not exceed 4 feet in height, or as otherwise required by a City or County barrier
regulation. THE WALL LAYOUT DEPICTED IN THE WALL PLAN SHALL BE
MODIFIED WHERE NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE SITE LAYOUT
CHANGES THAT AVOID CONFLICTS WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE OR
CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS.

c. Perimeter walls bounding the rear yard property lines of residential lots along
19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue shall include minimum three foot
offsets and material and textural differences, such as stucco, and/or split face
OR SLUMP block or a decorative element, such as tile or stamped designs, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

7. Project entry/exit drives along 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue shall
incorporate decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or similar alternative
material, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. Project entry/exit drives along 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue shall
incorporate enhanced landscaping on both sides planted with a variety of at least
three plant materials, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Each landscaped area shall be a minimum of 250-square feet.

9. A system of pedestrian connections shall be provided, to connect the following as
described below and as approved by the Planning and Development Department:

a. Amenity areas.


Page 673
Addendum B to the Staff Report Z-58-21-8
February 1, 2022


b. Sidewalks.

c. Pedestrian path connecting the northern PRIMARY AMENITY AREA and
southern WITH THE SOUTHERN AND WESTERN portions of the site via a
centralized pathway.

d. The common open space tract along the southwest corner of 19th Avenue and
South Mountain Avenue shall contain a minimum 8-foot wide pedestrian pathway
that connects the development with the sidewalk at 19th Avenue or South
Mountain Avenue near the street intersection. This pathway shall be constructed
of decomposed stabilized granite, decorative pavers, stamped or colored
concrete, or similar alternative material. The landscaped tract shall contain
minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees planted a minimum of 25 feet on center or
equivalent groupings, along both sides of the pedestrian pathway.

E. PEDESTRIAN ACCESS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG VEHICULAR
ACCESS POINTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT. THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS BY
ACCESSIBLE SIDEWALKS.

10. No more than 50 percent of the landscape areas within common areas or 10 percent
of the net development area whichever is less, should be planted in turf or high-water
use plants. Turf areas should be located only in the common open space areas,
including retention basins, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. This requirement does not apply to landscaping located within private
yards on individual lots.

11. The following shall be provided IN THE CENTRAL AMENITY AREA and/OR
dispersed throughout the development, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department:

a. Tot lot with shade equipment;

b. One picnic area with a barbeque grill, shade ramada and a picnic table; and

c. Two benches or seating features.

12. The sidewalk along 19th Avenue shall be a minimum of five feet in width and
detached with a minimum 13-foot wide landscape strip located between the sidewalk
and back of curb and planted to the following standards, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant shade trees
planted 25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings that provide shade to a
minimum 75 percent at maturity.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at maturity.

Page 674
Addendum B to the Staff Report Z-58-21-8
February 1, 2022



Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian
environment.

13. All sidewalks along South Mountain Avenue shall be detached with a minimum five-
foot wide landscape strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb and planted
to the following standards, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant shade trees
planted 25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings that provide shade to a
minimum 75 percent at maturity.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian
environment.

14. The developer shall dedicate 50-feet of right-of-way and construct the west half of
19th Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

15. The developer shall provide conduit and junction boxes at 19th Avenue and South
Mountain Avenue for future traffic signal equipment on the southwest corner of the
intersection. All work related to the construction or reconstruction of the conduit runs
and junction box installation shall be the responsibility of the Developer.

16. Existing irrigation facilities along 19th Avenue are to be undergrounded and relocated
outside of City of Phoenix right-of-way. Contact SRP to identify existing land rights
and establish appropriate process to relocate facility. Relocations that require
additional dedications or land transfer require completion prior to obtaining plat
and/or civil plan review approval.

17. The developer shall underground all existing electrical utilities located within the
public right-of-way that are impacted/ or need to be relocated as part of this project.
Coordinate with the affected utility companies for their review and permitting.

18. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping
and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

19. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development the existence and
operational characteristics of agricultural uses. These documents must advise
purchasers that, under Section 3-112(E), Arizona Revised Statutes, the City of

Page 675
Addendum B to the Staff Report Z-58-21-8
February 1, 2022


Phoenix may not declare an agricultural operation conducted on farmland to be a
nuisance if the agricultural use is lawful, customary, reasonable, safe and necessary
to the agriculture industry. The form and content of such documents shall be
reviewed and approved by the City prior to recordation.

20. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development the existence and
operational characteristics of the Phoenix Regional Police Academy gun range. The
form and content of such documents shall be reviewed by the City prior to
recordation.

21. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or tenants
of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

22. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of Phoenix
Aviation Department for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City
Attorney prior to final site plan approval.

23. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction analysis
review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

24. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the Archeology
Office to properly assess the materials.

25. IN ADDITION TO THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK, A MINIMUM 8-FOOT-WIDE
PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY OR TRAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED AND MAINTAINED
WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT ALONG 19TH AVENUE AND SOUTH MOUNTAIN
AVENUE, CONSTRUCTED OF DECOMPOSED GRANITE OR SIMILAR
ALTERNATIVE MATERIAL, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

26. THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE 3 DIFFERENT FRONT YARD PALETTES
CONSISTING OF ONE LARGE CANOPY ACCENT TREE, FIVE SHRUBS AND
TURF OR GROUND COVER, OR OFFER EVIDENCE OF A LANDSCAPING
INCENTIVE PACKAGE, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. REQUIRED FRONT YARD TREES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2-
INCH CALIPER SIZE AND LOCATED TO PROVIDE THE MAXIMUM SHADE
POSSIBLE TO SIDEWALKS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT, AS APPROVED BY
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.



Page 676
Addendum B to the Staff Report Z-58-21-8
February 1, 2022


27. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT ONE BUS STOP PAD ALONG
SOUTHBOUND 19TH AVENUE. THE BUS STOP PAD SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
ACCORDING TO CITY OF PHOENIX STANDARD DETAIL P1260 WITH A
MINIMUM DEPTH OF 10 FEET AND SHALL BE SPACED FROM THE
INTERSECTION OF SOUTH MOUNTAIN AVENUE ACCORDING TO CITY OF
PHOENIX STANDARD DETAIL P1258.

Exhibits
Conceptual Site Plan date stamped January 11, 2022
Conceptual Wall Plan date stamped January 11, 2022
Conceptual Wall Elevations date stamped January 11, 2022
Community correspondence (24 pages)




Page 677
Page 678
Page 679
Page 680
From: donatus agbakwu
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: Objection
Date: Monday, January 10, 2022 5:27:11 PM


Hello Enrique
This is to inform that I oppose applicant case numbers GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8 (agenda items
8 and 9). The applicant, K Hovnanian, has been unwilling to work with the neighborhood on any
changes to this project, specifically in regards to density, which is entirely inappropriate for our area.
Regards
Donarus Agbakwu
Magdelena Estate




Page 681
From: Erin Hegedus
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8
Date: Monday, January 10, 2022 1:12:40 PM




I am writing to oppose this request for rezoning.
The same design was presented four years ago and this committee rejected the request. This developer is basically
submitting the same plan.
The design is not consistent with the neighborhood. Adds no value to the neighbors and consequently is adding
more traffic than the roadways can handle, addititionally, more noise and heat.
The bus stop that was added is a negation as currently there is not s bus route and this will add even more noise and
traffic.
Please be aware that this developer does not own this property so he technically has no rights.
Please also note that we have offered many suggestions to make this development palatable to the neighbors but
every idea we have suggested has been ignored.

Sent from my iPhone




Page 682
From: Miguel Rubio
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8
Date: Monday, January 10, 2022 1:57:14 PM


I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 (CAMPANION CASE Z-58-21-8) and want to donate my speaking time to
Zach Brooks.

MIGUEL RUBIO

RB CONTRACTING LLC
8020 S 2OTH AVE
PHX,AZ 85041
(602) 366 9334




Page 683
From: stephanie rubio
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8
Date: Monday, January 10, 2022 1:18:42 PM




I oppose GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8) and want to donate my speaking time to
Zach Brooks.


Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device




Page 684
From: Dean Chiarelli
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: Andora revised site plan submitted January 10th, 2022
Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 11:36:58 AM



I am Dean Chiarelli and my address is 912 East La Mirada Drive, Phoenix AZ 85042.

I agree with the statement submitted by Jewel Clark regarding the updated Andora site plan
submitted on January 10th, 2022. I advocate for the SMVPC to NOT approve an amendment
to map and rezoning the area. The right developer will be able to make a profit without the
need to amend the GPA and rezone. There is already a large and excessive amount of higher-
density residential development under construction in the area right now.

Ms. Clark's rebuttal is cut and pasted below:
____________________________________________________________________

"After receiving the updated site plan submitted 1/10/22 I feel compelled to write a rebuttal
and update from my original letter.

This plan appears to be an attempt to comply with SMVPC member requests and create the
appearance of "working with the neighbors" and attempted the meagerest of reductions
based on hearing the Vice Mayor say he wouldn't support 66 houses at our last meeting. The
neighbors do not want a higher density development smack in the middle of S-1 acre+ lots
with custom homes, active farmland, and horse properties.

While Mr. Gilbert may argue that K Hovnanian has now come down to the same density (in
fact they've just copied the Kimura specs) the neighbors negotiated with John Poulsen across
the street for the Kimura development, no one in the neighborhood wanted the density that
was approved. We lacked any additional leverage to force the number lower and so agreed to
the final density offer in exchange for other accommodations like the deep setback, and heat
mitigation that we are still in negotiations on.

The neighborhood, as a body, wants lower density to prevail in our area because that is what
we bought into this area for, and what the Rio Montana and 2015 General Plans dictate to
preserve our rural character and certainty, and when we have the ability to hold a developer
accountable to that lower density, we are prepared to use it, as we are here.

The property is zoned S-1. There is an R1-18 overlay that the developer could take advantage
of to build to the density that the neighborhood would accept, along with other aspects like
heat mitigation and building practices that would help keep our area cooler and more in line
with the current rural character. As committee member Busching said at the December
meeting, "There is no right to rezone." These particular cases are an excellent example with



Page 685
which to practice this truth. There is nothing compelling in this site plan to warrant approving
this GPA or rezoning request. There is no neighborhood support. Please vote no on both
cases.

As an aside, I would like to address Dr. Brooks' eloquent words from the December meeting
about a "growing inequity" between the developers and the neighborhoods who come before
you. I very much appreciated hearing that and also hearing many other committee members
support his statement. I would only differ in my agreement by saying the inequity is not
growing but it is here. The virtual meetings, while convenient and we can agree necessary in
these times, make it impossible for you to see the full quantity of opposed neighbors. A room
full of people makes a certain impression that a list of attendees on Zoom can't. That and the
lack of time for the neighborhood to present compared to the developer's lawyers and the
lack of any rebuttal time for the neighborhood further stacks the deck in favor of the
developer. I don't know if you have the power to adopt a more equitable format without
turning the meeting into a 6 hour ordeal, but I do hope you can find a way".

Sincerely,
Jewel Clark
2020 West South Mountain Ave.
Phoenix, AZ 85041



--
H. Jewel Clark
hjewelclark@fastmail.com




Page 686
From: Gina Baker
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: Fwd: Andora opposition letter to latest plan for anyone who wants to read/sign on.
Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 11:06:08 AM




Hi Enrique,

I’d like to add this as my written statement to the SMVP Committee regarding my opposition to the zoning change.

I agree wholeheartedly agree with the entire statement below.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> After receiving the updated site plan submitted 1/10/22 I feel compelled to to write a rebuttal and update from my
original letter.
>
> This plan appears to be an attempt to comply with SMVPC member requests and create the appearance of
"working with the neighbors" and attempted the meagerest of reductions based on hearing the Vice Mayor say he
wouldn't support 66 houses at our last meeting. The neighbors do not want a higher density development smack in
the middle of S-1 acre+ lots with custom homes, active farmland, and horse properties.
>
> While Mr. Gilbert may argue that K Hovnanian has now come down to the same density (in fact they've just
copied the Kimura specs) the neighbors negotiated with John Poulsen across the street for the Kimura development,
no one in the neighborhood wanted the density that was approved. We lacked any additional leverage to force the
number lower and so agreed to the final density offer in exchange for other accommodations like the deep setback,
and heat mitigation that we are still in negotiations on.
>
> The neighborhood, as a body, wants lower density to prevail in our area because that is what we bought into this
area for, and what the Rio Montana and 2015 General Plans dictate to preserve our rural character and certainty, and
when we have the ability to hold a developer accountable to that lower density, we are prepared to use it, as we are
here.
>
> The property is zoned S-1. There is an R1-18 overlay that the developer could take advantage of to build to the
density that the neighborhood would accept, along with other aspects like heat mitigation and building practices that
would help keep our area cooler and more in line with the current rural character. As committee member Busching
said at the December meeting, "There is no right to rezone." These particular cases are an excellent example with
which to practice this truth. There is nothing compelling in this site plan to warrant approving this GPA or rezoning
request. There is no neighborhood support. Please vote no on both cases.
>
> As an aside, I would like to address Dr. Brooks' eloquent words from the December meeting about a "growing
inequity" between the developers and the neighborhoods who come before you. I very much appreciated hearing
that and also hearing many other committee members support his statement. I would only differ in my agreement by
saying the inequity is not growing but it is here. The virtual meetings, while convenient and we can agree necessary
in these times, make it impossible for you to see the full quantity of opposed neighbors. A room full of people
makes a certain impression that a list of attendees on Zoom can't. That and the lack of time for the neighborhood to
present compared to the developer's lawyers and the lack of any rebuttal time for the neighborhood further stacks the
deck in favor of the developer. I don't know if you have the power to adopt a more equitable format without turning
the meeting into a 6 hour ordeal, but I do hope you can find a way.
>
> Sincerely,
> Jewel Clark
> 2020 West South Mountain Ave.
> Phoenix, Az

Gina Johnson



Page 687
1816 W Magdalena Ln
Phoenix, AZ 85041
Magdalena Estates
>
>




Page 688
From: H. Jewel Clark
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: Opposition to GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8 (agenda items 8 and 9) - latest plan
Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 10:01:53 AM


Hi Enrique,

After receiving the updated site plan submitted 1/10/22 I feel compelled to to write a rebuttal
and update from my original letter.

This plan appears to be an attempt to comply with SMVPC member requests and create the
appearance of "working with the neighbors" and attempted the meagerest of reductions based
on hearing the Vice Mayor say he wouldn't support 66 houses at our last meeting. The
neighbors do not want a higher density development smack in the middle of S-1 acre+ lots
with custom homes, active farmland, and horse properties.

While Mr. Gilbert may argue that K Hovnanian has now come down to the same density (in
fact they've just copied the Kimura specs) the neighbors negotiated with John Poulsen across
the street for the Kimura development, no one in the neighborhood wanted the density that
was approved. We lacked any additional leverage to force the number lower and so agreed to
the final density offer in exchange for other accommodations like the deep setback, and heat
mitigation that we are still in negotiations on.

The neighborhood, as a body, wants lower density to prevail in our area because that is what
we bought into this area for, and what the Rio Montana and 2015 General Plans dictate to
preserve our rural character and certainty, and when we have the ability to hold a developer
accountable to that lower density, we are prepared to use it, as we are here.

The property is zoned S-1. There is an R1-18 overlay that the developer could take advantage
of to build to the density that the neighborhood would accept, along with other aspects like
heat mitigation and building practices that would help keep our area cooler and more in line
with the current rural character. As committee member Busching said at the December
meeting, "There is no right to rezone." These particular cases are an excellent example with
which to practice this truth. There is nothing compelling in this site plan to warrant approving
this GPA or rezoning request. There is no neighborhood support. Please vote no on both cases.

As an aside, I would like to address Dr. Brooks' eloquent words from the December meeting
about a "growing inequity" between the developers and the neighborhoods who come before
you. I very much appreciated hearing that and also hearing many other committee members
support his statement. I would only differ in my agreement by saying the inequity is not
growing but it is here. The virtual meetings, while convenient and we can agree necessary in
these times, make it impossible for you to see the full quantity of opposed neighbors. A room
full of people makes a certain impression that a list of attendees on Zoom can't. That and the
lack of time for the neighborhood to present compared to the developer's lawyers and the lack
of any rebuttal time for the neighborhood further stacks the deck in favor of the developer. I
don't know if you have the power to adopt a more equitable format without turning the
meeting into a 6 hour ordeal, but I do hope you can find a way.

Sincerely,
Jewel Clark



Page 689
2020 West South Mountain Ave.
Phoenix, AZ 85041

--
H. Jewel Clark
hjewelclark@fastmail.com




Page 690
From: Leticia Rivera
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: I support the following statement
Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 10:58:26 AM




Mr Bojórquez-Gaxiola,

This statement was not written by me but am in support of the request it makes.

“This plan appears to be an attempt to comply with SMVPC member requests and create the appearance of
"working with the neighbors" and attempted the [most meager] of reductions based on hearing the Vice Mayor say
he wouldn't support 66 houses at our last meeting. The neighbors do not want a higher density development smack
in the middle of S-1 acre+ lots with custom homes, active farmland, and horse properties.

While Mr. Gilbert may argue that K Hovnanian has now come down to the same density (in fact they've just copied
the Kimura specs) the neighbors negotiated with John Poulsen across the street for the Kimura development, no one
in the neighborhood wanted the density that was approved. We lacked any additional leverage to force the number
lower and so agreed to the final density offer in exchange for other accommodations like the deep setback, and heat
mitigation that we are still in negotiations on.

The neighborhood, as a body, wants lower density to prevail in our area because that is what we bought into this
area for, and what the Rio Montana and 2015 General Plans dictate to preserve our rural character and certainty, and
when we have the ability to hold a developer accountable to that lower density, we are prepared to use it, as we are
here.

The property is zoned S-1. There is an R1-18 overlay that the developer could take advantage of to build to the
density that the neighborhood would accept, along with other aspects like heat mitigation and building practices that
would help keep our area cooler and more in line with the current rural character. As committee member Busching
said at the December meeting, "There is no right to rezone." These particular cases are an excellent example with
which to practice this truth. There is nothing compelling in this site plan to warrant approving this GPA or rezoning
request. There is no neighborhood support. Please vote no on both cases.

As an aside, I would like to address Dr. Brooks' eloquent words from the December meeting about a "growing
inequity" between the developers and the neighborhoods who come before you. I very much appreciated hearing
that and also hearing many other committee members support his statement. I would only differ in my agreement by
saying the inequity is not growing but it is here. The virtual meetings, while convenient and we can agree necessary
in these times, make it impossible for you to see the full quantity of opposed neighbors. A room full of people
makes a certain impression that a list of attendees on Zoom can't. That and the lack of time for the neighborhood to
present compared to the developer's lawyers and the lack of any rebuttal time for the neighborhood further stacks the
deck in favor of the developer. I don't know if you have the power to adopt a more equitable format without turning
the meeting into a 6 hour ordeal, but I do hope you can find a way. “

Leticia Rivera
1716 W. Magdalena Ln
Phoenix 85041




Page 691
From: Ravi Sharma
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Cc: Ravi Sharma
Subject: City of Phoenix - Update on case GPA-SM-3-21-8
Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 1:59:12 PM


Hello Mr. Bojorques-gaxiola,

Upon reviewing the updated plan submitted 1/10/2022, my wife and I oppose the latest plans
offered by the developer.
The neighborhood, as a body, wants lower density to prevail in our area because that is what
we bought into this area for, and what the Rio Montana and 2015 General Plans dictate to
preserve our rural character and certainty, and when we have the ability to hold a developer
accountable to that lower density, we are prepared to use it, as we are here.
The property is zoned S-1. There is an R1-18 overlay that the developer could take advantage
of to build to the density that the neighborhood would accept, along with other aspects like
heat mitigation and building practices that would help keep our area cooler and more in line
with the current rural character. As committee member Busching said at the December
meeting, "There is no right to rezone." These particular cases are an excellent example with
which to practice this truth. There is nothing compelling in this site plan to warrant approving
this GPA or rezoning request. There is no neighborhood support. Please vote no on both cases.

As an aside, I would like to address Dr. Brooks' eloquent words from the December meeting
about a "growing inequity" between the developers and the neighborhoods who come before
you. I very much appreciated hearing that and also hearing many other committee members
support his statement. I would only differ in my agreement by saying the inequity is not
growing but it is here. The virtual meetings, while convenient and we can agree are necessary
in these times, make it impossible for you to see the full quantity of opposed neighbors. A
room full of people makes a certain impression that a list of attendees on Zoom can't. That and
the lack of time for the neighborhood to present compared to the developer's lawyers and the
lack of any rebuttal time for the neighborhood further stacks the deck in favor of the
developer. I don't know if you have the power to adopt a more equitable format without
turning the meeting into a 6 hour ordeal, but I do hope you can find a way.

My wife and I support the above statements.

Dr. Ravi and Snigdha Sharma
8012 S. 20th. Avenue
Phoenix, AZ85041




Page 692
From: Rob Barnes
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: FW: Opposition to development
Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 10:57:45 AM




Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone



-------- Original message --------
From: Rob Barnes
Date: 1/11/22 10:54 AM (GMT-07:00)
To: enrique.bojorquezgaxiola@phoenix.gov
Subject: Opposition to development


I agree with the following statement from H.Jewel Clark, additionally I would like to yield my
speaking time to Zach Brooks.

Respectfully,
Robert Barnes
Magdalena Estates
8312 S 18th Ln
Phoenix AZ 85041

-----------------------------------------------------

After receiving the updated site plan submitted 1/10/22 I feel compelled to to write a rebuttal
and update from my original letter.

This plan appears to be an attempt to comply with SMVPC member requests and create the
appearance of "working with the neighbors" and attempted the meagerest of reductions based
on hearing the Vice Mayor say he wouldn't support 66 houses at our last meeting. The
neighbors do not want a higher density development smack in the middle of S-1 acre+ lots
with custom homes, active farmland, and horse properties.

While Mr. Gilbert may argue that K Hovnanian has now come down to the same density (in
fact they've just copied the Kimura specs) the neighbors negotiated with John Poulsen across
the street for the Kimura development, no one in the neighborhood wanted the density that
was approved. We lacked any additional leverage to force the number lower and so agreed to
the final density offer in exchange for other accommodations like the deep setback, and heat
mitigation that we are still in negotiations on.

The neighborhood, as a body, wants lower density to prevail in our area because that is what
we bought into this area for, and what the Rio Montana and 2015 General Plans dictate to
preserve our rural character and certainty, and when we have the ability to hold a developer
accountable to that lower density, we are prepared to use it, as we are here.



Page 693
The property is zoned S-1. There is an R1-18 overlay that the developer could take advantage
of to build to the density that the neighborhood would accept, along with other aspects like
heat mitigation and building practices that would help keep our area cooler and more in line
with the current rural character. As committee member Busching said at the December
meeting, "There is no right to rezone." These particular cases are an excellent example with
which to practice this truth. There is nothing compelling in this site plan to warrant approving
this GPA or rezoning request. There is no neighborhood support. Please vote no on both cases.

As an aside, I would like to address Dr. Brooks' eloquent words from the December meeting
about a "growing inequity" between the developers and the neighborhoods who come before
you. I very much appreciated hearing that and also hearing many other committee members
support his statement. I would only differ in my agreement by saying the inequity is not
growing but it is here. The virtual meetings, while convenient and we can agree necessary in
these times, make it impossible for you to see the full quantity of opposed neighbors. A room
full of people makes a certain impression that a list of attendees on Zoom can't. That and the
lack of time for the neighborhood to present compared to the developer's lawyers and the lack
of any rebuttal time for the neighborhood further stacks the deck in favor of the developer. I
don't know if you have the power to adopt a more equitable format without turning the
meeting into a 6 hour ordeal, but I do hope you can find a way.




Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone




Page 694
From: Dean Chiarelli
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: SMVPC Meeting Jan 11, 2022--- Abstain from vote
Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 2:58:06 PM


Re: GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8)
South Mountain Village Planning Committee [SMVPC]
Meeting January 11, 2022
I request that Ms. Daniels, SMVPC Chair, abstain from voting on the items. Ms. Daniels is a Realtor in
the South Mountain area, and her real-estate business activities give the appearance of a conflict of
interest. During prior meetings, Ms. Daniels declared herself a Realtor in South Phoenix, and
remarked publicly that perhaps she could sell some properties reviewed by the SMVPC. It is
unethical if she (or any other Planning Member) votes on an item they will benefit commercially and
financially. Within Ms. Daniels’ position of authority as Chair, she should exercise good judgment
and abstain from voting.
The Village Planning Handbook item 8., page 9, states that a committee member should refrain
from participating when a conflict of interest exists, and it includes language for a perceived conflict
of interest.




Source:
https://www.phoenix.gov/villagessite/Documents/pdd_pz_pdf_00020.pdf#search=village%20planning%20handbook
Accessed January 11, 2022

Furthermore, the City of Phoenix Ethics Handbook- Employees & Volunteers page 8 clearly defines
an example of conflict-of-interest for a Realtor Listing Agreement. The handbook states “If a board
member participated in consideration of the matter, the board member should not later enter the
listing agreement.”




Page 695
Source:https://www.phoenix.gov/citymanagersite/Documents/Ethics/Ethics_Handbook_Employee_Volunteers.pdf
Accessed: January 11, 2022

Ms. Daniel’s appearance of a conflict of interest is based on LinkedIn™ website data regarding The
Courtyards at Madison Ranch [Z-36-06], and Copper Leaf [Z-22-02]. Both were reviewed during Ms.
Daniels' appointment to the SMVPC. Upon approval, Ms. Daniels had the opportunity to benefit
commercially and financially as demonstrated below.




Page 696
Source: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tamala-l-daniels-pllc-b3372bb [linkedin.com]
Accessed January 7, 2022.

Ms. Daniels LinkedIn™ profile identifies her as “Exclusive Realtor” for The Courtyards at Madison
Ranch [Z-36-06].




Ms. Daniels' LinkedIn™ profile identifies her as “New Home Developer Consultant, New Home
Specialist” for Copper Leaf [Z-22-02].




Page 697
I perceive Ms. Daniels' residential real-estate activity as a conflict of interest. I verbally stated my
concern to Vice-Mayor Carlos Garcia during the community meeting on January 3rd, 2022. As Chair,
Ms. Daniels has authority to facilitate meetings and alter the agenda order. In December, 2021 I
observed her unfairly limit speaking time to various stakeholders, especially JoAnne Jensen who
represented a community group. Other meeting attendees expressed agreement and appreciate
this issue being brought to the table.
Village Planners function as volunteers, and I genuinely appreciate their devotion of time and energy
to fulfilling their roles. As volunteers, Planners have an ethical obligation not to appear to have an
actual or the appearance of a conflict of interest. I request that Ms. Daniels, and any other
Committee Member who is a realtor or otherwise has a commercial interest, abstain from voting
on GPA-SM-3-21-8 (Companion Case Z-58-21-8). There is a high-level of opposition which is well-
documented within the community.

I am Pro-Development, and my position on these items is that the SMVPC should OPPOSE. The right
builder will make a profit without the need to amend the map and rezone. This land is prime, and
the best use is as part of PlanPHX 2015 and South Phoenix Food Plan enterprises (related to
agricultural enterprise such as “agritainment”) or residential, which does not increase density. A
precedent is set by the City of Phoenix AZ Fresh™ initiative. I would like to see more businesses such
as Grandma's Farm™, The Farm at South Mountain™, Arizona Worm Farm™ contribute to the
unique, rich, historic location. Phoenix is poised to become a food innovation and agricultural hub.
Prime land is lost forever when GPA map is amended and rezoned for higher-density, generic
housing.
Dean Chiarelli




Page 698
Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola

To: Tamala Daniels
Subject: RE: DISAPPROVE Presentation Request - Z-58-21-8 and GPA-SM-3-21-8



From:TamalaDaniels
Sent:Tuesday,January11,20225:14PM
To:EnriqueABojorquezͲGaxiola
Subject:Re:DISAPPROVEPresentationRequestͲZͲ58Ͳ21Ͳ8andGPAͲSMͲ3Ͳ21Ͳ8

HiEnrique

Thankyoufortalkingwithmetoday.Afterreviewingthepresentationattachedthereisnoreferencetoanyofthe
zoningandplanningcasesontheagendatoday.

AstheChair,IDISAPPROVEthepresentationfortonightandfeelitisnottheproperforum.

ZoningandPlanningcommitteesareacollectivebodyofcommunityresidentsthatserveinprofessionalcareers
throughouttherealestateindustryandotherprofessionalcareersincludingtheCityOfPhx.

AspermyconversationCopperLeafwasoriginalapprovedbytheCityofPhoenixpossiblein2000withTrend
Homes.Mydeveloperpurchaseinafter2008outofbankruptcy.Imeetthenewdeveloperin2016andthenbecame
theexclusiverealtorforprojectNOnewrezoningcasebecausetheprojectwasalreadyzoneforcondosandalreadyhad
5buildingsbuiltbyTrendHomeandfinishedtheproject!

TheCourtyardatMadisonRanchIinterviewedandwashiredin2014.

IhaveseveredontheSMVPplanningcommitteeforyearsandevenpassedonvotingon2projectinSouthPhoenix
becauseIalreadywasworkingforadeveloperonaprojectinNorthPhoenix.

Iservewithintegrity,honestyandfulltransparency.Ihaveusedmyservicetoprocureavoteforbusiness.

Iwillcontinuetoservemycommunityhonorandrespect!

Sincerely

TamalaLDaniels,PLLC|REALTOR
NewHomeDeveloperConsultant
NewHomeSpecialist
Speaker.Advocate
Designations:GRI,ABR,CNE,CIAS,CDPE
RealtyONEGroup
Direct:602.688.6327
www.BestofPhoenixLiving.com[bestofphoenixliving.com]






Page 699
OnJan11,2022,at3:54PM,EnriqueABojorquezͲGaxiola
wrote:


MyapologiesTamala,

Ireceivedasecondemailaftermypreviousemailbelowfromamemberofthepublic,Mr.Dean
Chiarelli,whowantstoknowifyouwillallowhimtoshowthefollowingpresentation(seeattached)?

Thisissimilartotheletterthatmakesreferencetoyou.

Iwillhavethepresentationreadyjustincaseyouallowhimtoshowit.

Thankyou!

Enrique Bojórquez Gaxiola
Planner III
Planning & Development Department
Long Range Planning Division
200 W. Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Office: (602) 262-6949



***I am currently working remotely on a rotational schedule, but will be checking voicemails
multiple times per day. Please feel free to leave me a voice message or email me for a more
timely response. Thank you.***






Page 700
From: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
To: Dean Chiarelli
Subject: RE: SMVPC: Request for meeting minutes & voting record
Date: Monday, January 10, 2022 2:36:00 PM
Attachments: image001.png


Hello Dean,

How are you? If you do not get the case files by tomorrow 11am, email me and let me know so that I
can get these documents over you on behalf of the Zoning Team.

However, I Iooked at the minutes for case Z-36-06 and see that Ms. Daniels was absent during that
meeting on July 11, 2006:




The rezoning case file for Z-22-02 is larger and could not find the minutes from browsing the



Page 701
electronic file. It might be difficult to get these minutes by tomorrow if the Zoning Team need to
research these in the physical archives, as the electronic file does not seem to have the minutes (or
at least I could not locate these).

Let me know if questions arise.

Thanks!

Enrique Bojórquez Gaxiola
Planner III
Planning & Development Department
Long Range Planning Division
200 W. Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Office: (602) 262-6949




***I am currently working remotely on a rotational schedule, but will be checking voicemails multiple times
per day. Please feel free to leave me a voice message or email me for a more timely response. Thank
you.***




From: Dean Chiarelli
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2022 1:15 PM
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: Re: SMVPC: Request for meeting minutes & voting record

Hello Enrique- I submitted a request and probably won't have the items returned before the
SMVPC January 11 meeting. In the meantime, can you or someone provide me with Ms.
Daniel's voting record on Madison Ranch [Z-36-06] and Copper Leaf [Z-22-02]? In particular I
would like to know if she abstained or if she voted "Yes" on the item(s). Thank you,

Dean Chiarelli




Page 702
From: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Sent: Friday, January 7, 2022 3:12 PM
To: Dean Chiarelli
Subject: RE: SMVPC: Request for meeting minutes & voting record


Good afternoon Dean,



How are you? Yes, the rezoning case number for Madison Ranch is Z-36-06 and Copper Leaf is Z-22-
02.



If you could submit a public records request (noting that you want a copy of rezoning cases Z-36-06
and Z-22-02) using the following website, a member of the Zoning Team will be able to send you
these files via email that include meeting minutes, votes, staff reports, etc.
https://www.phoenix.gov/pio/public-records-request



Let me know if questions arise.



Thank you,



Enrique Bojórquez Gaxiola

Planner III


Planning & Development Department

Long Range Planning Division

200 W. Washington Street

Phoenix, AZ 85003

Office: (602) 262-6949




Page 703
***I am currently working remotely on a rotational schedule, but will be checking voicemails multiple times
per day. Please feel free to leave me a voice message or email me for a more timely response. Thank
you.***




From: Dean Chiarelli
Sent: Friday, January 7, 2022 2:59 PM
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: SMVPC: Request for meeting minutes & voting record



Hello Enrique,

I am contacting you to request your assistance to locate the public meeting minutes & voting
records for two residential development projects in South Mountain.

The Courtyards at Madison Ranch
Located on the Northeast Corner of 19th Avenue and Baseline Road
- Preliminary site plan attached
Copper Leaf Villas
Located on 22nd Terrace and Southern Avenue
- I was unable to find reference documents for Copper Leaf Villas when I searched the
Can you please provide the documents or steer me in the right direction? Thanks for your
assistance.

Dean Chiarelli




Page 704
Attachment F




ADDENDUM C
Staff Report: Z-58-21-8
February 3, 2022

South Mountain Village Planning January 11, 2022
Committee Meeting Date: December 14, 2021
Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 3, 2022
January 6, 2022
Request From: S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence District),
approved R1-18 (Single-Family Residence
District) (20.76 acres)
Request To: R1-10 (Single-Family Residence District)
(20.76 acres)
Proposed Use: Detached single-family residential
Location: Southwest corner of 19th Avenue and
South Mountain Avenue
Owner: PW Again, LLC
Applicant: Paul Gilbert, Beus Gilbert McGroder, PLLC
Representative: Paul Gilbert, Beus Gilbert McGroder, PLLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations


On February 2, 2022, an updated site plan and wall plan were submitted by the
applicant after the Addendum B Staff Report. The changes from Addendum B proposed
in the current site plan include a decrease in the number of lots from 63 to 52, a
minimum lot width of 75 feet, and relocation of the primary vehicular entrance area to
19th Avenue.

Due to these changes, staff recommends modifying the following stipulations:

• Stipulation No. 1 regarding general conformance with the site plan and updates
reflected within the latest plan pertaining to lot widths and site access;
• Stipulation No. 4 regarding clarification on the new proposed lot widths;
• Stipulation No. 6 regarding general conformance to the new proposed wall plan;
• Stipulation Nos. 7 and 8 regarding updates due to the proposed primary access
to the site along 19th Avenue;
• Stipulation No. 25 regarding the dedication and construction of a multi-use trail
per city standards;
• Stipulation No. 26 regarding a total of two trees to be provided per lot as part of
the landscape incentive package for the development; and


Page 705
Addendum C to the Staff Report Z-58-21-8
February 3, 2022


• New Stipulation No. 28 which requires a proposition 207 waiver form to be
submitted.

Following the publication of the Addendum B Staff Report, staff received additional
correspondence from the public regarding this case. This additional correspondence is
also attached.

Staff recommends approval per the modified stipulations, reflecting updates to the site
plan, provided below:

Stipulations

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date stamped
November 22, 2021 JANUARY 3, 2022, JANUARY 11, 2022, FEBRUARY 2, 2022,
as modified by the following stipulations and approved by the Planning and
Development Department with specific regard to the following:

a. The development shall be limited to a maximum of 67 66 63 52 lots.


b. Lots 1 through 14 7, 13 THROUGH 27, AND LOTS 62 58 THROUGH 66 63
shall be a minimum of 65 feet in width.

c. Lots 15, 16, 17 and 49 8 THROUGH 13 shall be a minimum of 60 feet in width.


d. Lots 50 14 28 through 67 28 31 AND LOT 61 shall be a minimum of 70 feet in
C. width.

e. All other lots shall be a minimum of 50 60 75 feet in width.
D.
B.

f. Lots shall be a minimum of 45 feet from the southern perimeter property line.
E.
C.


g. Lots shall be a minimum of 25 50 feet from the western perimeter property line.
F.
D.

h. A minimum 10-foot wide landscape setback shall be provided along the southern
G. and western perimeter of the site.
E.


Page 706
Addendum C to the Staff Report Z-58-21-8
February 3, 2022


i. The location of the open space areas.
H.
F.

j. A minimum of 17 percent of the gross site area, exclusive of required landscape
I. setbacks, shall be provided as open space.
G.

k. A minimum building setback of 50 feet, exclusive of fencing, entry features or
J. detached accessory structures, shall be provided along the northern and eastern
H. perimeter of the site along 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue.

l. A minimum 25-foot wide landscape setback shall be provided along 19th Avenue
K. and South Mountain Avenue. The landscape setback may be reduced to 20 feet
I. for up to 50 percent of this frontage for the purpose of staggering the perimeter
theme wall.

M. FULL INGRESS AND EGRESS TO THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE LIMITED
L. TO SOUTH MOUNTAIN AVENUE 19TH AVENUE.
J.

2. All landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 50-percent 2-inch caliper and
50-percent 3-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings, with five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

3. The maximum building height for lots 1 through 17 and lots 49 through 67, as
depicted on the site plan date stamped November 22, 2021, shall be limited to one
story and 20 22 feet.

4. All lots in the development shall be subject to Single-Family Design Review,
including lots that are wider than 65 feet, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

5. Building elevations shall be developed to the following standards, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department:

a. Building elevations shall contain multiple colors, exterior accent materials and
textural changes that exhibit quality and durability such as brick, stone, colored
textured concrete or stucco, or other materials to provide a decorative and
aesthetic treatment.

b. A minimum of 50 percent of the elevations for each floor plan shall provide a
covered front porch in the front yard with a minimum of 60 square feet in area at
a depth of at least six feet. No porch shall terminate within the plane of a door or
window.
Page 707
Addendum C to the Staff Report Z-58-21-8
February 3, 2022



c. Pitched roofs shall be provided on all primary building elevations.

6. Fences and wall are subject to the following stipulations, in addition to the Zoning
Ordinance requirements, and approved by the Planning and Development
Department. FENCES AND WALLS SHALL BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE
WITH THE SITE WALL ELEVATIONS DATE STAMPED DECEMBER 23, 2021
JANUARY 11, 2022 AND SITE WALL PLAN DATE STAMPED JANUARY 3, 2022,
JANUARY 11, 2022 FEBRUARY 2, 2022, AS MODIFIED BY THE FOLLOWING
STIPULATIONS, AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT:

a. Full open view fencing, WHICH MAY INCLUDE SOLID COLUMNS UP TO 24
INCHES IN WIDTH, shall be utilized where walls are proposed around open
space areas adjacent to a perimeter public street.

b. Where view fencing is required by the Zoning Ordinance, a combination of solid
masonry wall and view fencing may be utilized. The solid portion of the wall shall
not exceed 4 feet in height, or as otherwise required by a City or County barrier
regulation. THE WALL LAYOUT DEPICTED IN THE WALL PLAN SHALL BE
MODIFIED WHERE NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE SITE LAYOUT
CHANGES THAT AVOID CONFLICTS WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE OR
CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS.

c. Perimeter walls bounding the rear yard property lines of residential lots along
19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue shall include minimum three foot
offsets and material and textural differences, such as stucco, and/or split face
OR SLUMP block or a decorative element, such as tile or stamped designs, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

7. Project entry/exit drives along 19th Avenue and South Mountain 19TH Avenue shall
incorporate decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or similar alternative
material, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. Project entry/exit drives along 19th Avenue and South Mountain 19TH Avenue shall
incorporate enhanced landscaping on both sides planted with a variety of at least
three plant materials, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Each landscaped area shall be a minimum of 250-square feet.

9. A system of pedestrian connections shall be provided, to connect the following as
described below and as approved by the Planning and Development Department:

a. Amenity areas.

b. Sidewalks.

c. Pedestrian path connecting the northern PRIMARY AMENITY AREA and

Page 708
Addendum C to the Staff Report Z-58-21-8
February 3, 2022


southern WITH THE SOUTHERN AND WESTERN portions of the site via a
centralized pathway.

d. The common open space tract along the southwest corner of 19th Avenue and
South Mountain Avenue shall contain a minimum 8-foot wide pedestrian pathway
that connects the development with the sidewalk at 19th Avenue or South
Mountain Avenue near the street intersection. This pathway shall be constructed
of decomposed stabilized granite, decorative pavers, stamped or colored
concrete, or similar alternative material. The landscaped tract shall contain
minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees planted a minimum of 25 feet on center or
equivalent groupings, along both sides of the pedestrian pathway.

E. PEDESTRIAN ACCESS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG VEHICULAR ACCESS
POINTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT. THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS BY
ACCESSIBLE SIDEWALKS.

10. No more than 50 percent of the landscape areas within common areas or 10 percent
of the net development area whichever is less, should be planted in turf or high-water
use plants. Turf areas should be located only in the common open space areas,
including retention basins, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. This requirement does not apply to landscaping located within private
yards on individual lots.

11. The following shall be provided IN THE CENTRAL AMENITY AREA and/OR
dispersed throughout the development, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department:

a. Tot lot with shade equipment;

b. One picnic area with a barbeque grill, shade ramada and a picnic table; and

c. Two benches or seating features.

12. The sidewalk along 19th Avenue shall be a minimum of five feet in width and
detached with a minimum 13-foot wide landscape strip located between the sidewalk
and back of curb and planted to the following standards, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant shade trees
planted 25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings that provide shade to a
minimum 75 percent at maturity.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at maturity.




Page 709
Addendum C to the Staff Report Z-58-21-8
February 3, 2022


Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian
environment.

13. All sidewalks along South Mountain Avenue shall be detached with a minimum five-
foot wide landscape strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb and planted
to the following standards, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant shade trees
planted 25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings that provide shade to a
minimum 75 percent at maturity.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian
environment.

14. The developer shall dedicate 50-feet of right-of-way and construct the west half of
19th Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

15. The developer shall provide conduit and junction boxes at 19th Avenue and South
Mountain Avenue for future traffic signal equipment on the southwest corner of the
intersection. All work related to the construction or reconstruction of the conduit runs
and junction box installation shall be the responsibility of the Developer.

16. Existing irrigation facilities along 19th Avenue are to be undergrounded and relocated
outside of City of Phoenix right-of-way. Contact SRP to identify existing land rights
and establish appropriate process to relocate facility. Relocations that require
additional dedications or land transfer require completion prior to obtaining plat
and/or civil plan review approval.

17. The developer shall underground all existing electrical utilities located within the
public right-of-way that are impacted/ or need to be relocated as part of this project.
Coordinate with the affected utility companies for their review and permitting.

18. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping
and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

19. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development the existence and
operational characteristics of agricultural uses. These documents must advise
purchasers that, under Section 3-112(E), Arizona Revised Statutes, the City of
Phoenix may not declare an agricultural operation conducted on farmland to be a

Page 710
Addendum C to the Staff Report Z-58-21-8
February 3, 2022


nuisance if the agricultural use is lawful, customary, reasonable, safe and necessary
to the agriculture industry. The form and content of such documents shall be
reviewed and approved by the City prior to recordation.

20. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development the existence and
operational characteristics of the Phoenix Regional Police Academy gun range. The
form and content of such documents shall be reviewed by the City prior to
recordation.

21. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or tenants
of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

22. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of Phoenix
Aviation Department for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City
Attorney prior to final site plan approval.

23. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction analysis
review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

24. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the Archeology
Office to properly assess the materials.

25. IN ADDITION TO THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK, A MINIMUM 8-FOOT-WIDE
PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY OR TRAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED AND MAINTAINED
WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT ALONG 19TH AVENUE AND SOUTH MOUNTAIN
AVENUE, CONSTRUCTED OF DECOMPOSED GRANITE OR SIMILAR
ALTERNATIVE MATERIAL, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE DEVELOPER SHALL DEDICATE A MULTI-
USE TRAIL EASEMENT (MUTE) ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF 19TH AVENUE
AND SOUTH SIDE OF SOUTH MOUNTAIN AVENUE AND CONSTRUCT A
MINIMUM 10-FOOT WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL (MUT) WITHIN THE EASEMENT IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE MAG SUPPLEMENTAL DETAIL, AS APPROVED BY
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE DEVELOPER SHALL
WORK WITH THE SITE PLANNING SECTION ON AN ALTERNATE DESIGN FOR
THIS REQUIREMENT THROUGH THE TECHNICAL APPEAL PROCESS.

26. THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE 3 DIFFERENT FRONT YARD PALETTES
CONSISTING OF ONE TWO LARGE CANOPY ACCENT TREES, FIVE SHRUBS
AND TURF OR GROUND COVER, OR OFFER EVIDENCE OF A LANDSCAPING
INCENTIVE PACKAGE, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

Page 711
Addendum C to the Staff Report Z-58-21-8
February 3, 2022


DEPARTMENT. REQUIRED FRONT YARD TREES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2-
INCH CALIPER SIZE AND LOCATED TO PROVIDE THE MAXIMUM SHADE
POSSIBLE TO SIDEWALKS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT, AS APPROVED BY
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

27. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT ONE BUS STOP PAD ALONG
SOUTHBOUND 19TH AVENUE. THE BUS STOP PAD SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
ACCORDING TO CITY OF PHOENIX STANDARD DETAIL P1260 WITH A
MINIMUM DEPTH OF 10 FEET AND SHALL BE SPACED FROM THE
INTERSECTION OF SOUTH MOUNTAIN AVENUE ACCORDING TO CITY OF
PHOENIX STANDARD DETAIL P1258.

28. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER SHALL
EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE WAIVER
SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE
AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REZONING
APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.

Exhibits
Conceptual Site Plan date stamped February 2, 2022
Conceptual Wall Plan date stamped February 2, 2022
Community correspondence (9 pages)




Page 712
Page 713
Page 714
Racelle Escolar

From: Erin Hegedus
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 2:59 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Adriana Garcia Maximiliano; Council District 8 PCC
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8



I am writing to oppose the request to rezone the referenced proposals.

This request was rejected by the Village Planning Commission four years ago and again in January of this year.

The amount of homes and the style of homes strongly conflict with the surrounding community and do not
add any value to the neighborhood or does it maintain the rural character of this unique area.

Specifically, to allow 2 to 3.5 dwellings per acre would negatively impact the neighborhood in regards to traffic
congestion and safety. South Mountain Avenue is a 1 lane road at points and has two elementary schools that
when school is in session, the roads are completely backed up.

Additionally, this developer has not listened to the neighbors in regards to our asking for a better design and
fewer homes. Maintaining the rural character of the neighborhood, maintaining open spaces or considerations
for heat mitigation. They have only stated that they are interested in building as many homes as possible at a
cost that will be profitable to them. This does not sound to me or the over 30 neighbors that are in
opposition.

I ask you to either oppose or continue this case in order that the developer make an effort to build a
development that would enhance not detract from the current characteristic.

Thank you for your time,

Erin Hegedus, CMRP
8630 South 19th Avenue
Phoenix, AZ 85041
602‐717‐3185




Page1 715
Racelle Escolar

From: Dean Chiarelli
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2022 2:46 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Opposition: Andora GPA-SM-3-21-8 & Z-58-21-8



Re: Application #: GPA‐SM‐3‐21‐8 (Continued from 1/6/2022)
Application #: Z‐58‐21‐8 (Continued from 1/6/2022)

I oppose both cases and request to speak about both items.

I am a Registered Dietitian Nutritionist, a Registered Environmental Health Specialist, and a homeowner & resident in
South Phoenix for 10 years. I oppose the amendment to the General Plan Land Use and Rezoning because the right
developer will be able to profit without the need to amend and rezone. Andora is a generic and dull housing
development that adds very little to South Mountain. Strong community opposition is well‐documented: excess traffic
on one‐lane roads, emergency vehicle access, negative environmental impact on agriculture (heat, water scarcity), and
loss of prime land well‐suited agricultural enterprise (per PlanPHX 2015 and the South Mountain Food Plan) such as
“agritainment”. The City of Phoenix traffic study for the area is 10+ years old. It does not provide objective data for
Dobbins Corridor in 2022 with all the new houses not yet built.

I am Pro‐Development and believe with confidence the right developer(s) will be able to profit without the need to
amend and rezone this land in a way that will inevitably reduce the quality of life for existing residents. The Grandma's
Farm™, and the Farm at South Mountain™ are great examples of the type of enterprises I advocate for. The Planning
Commission should prioritize & value prime land as best used for development such as the AZ Fresh™ Food and
Innovation Hub in the Rio Salado area. If residential development occurs it needs to comply with existing zoning. I
demand the Planning Commission balance the abundant and quick approvals of higher‐density real estate with cultural
amenities and businesses which honor the existing zoning. South Mountain is unique. It does not need more gas
stations, fast‐food, and storage units, and cookie‐cutter development.

Several SMVPC member, including Chair, are realtors and there is a perceived conflict of interest in which Planners go on
to profit commercially AFTER they participate in a Planning business. I recorded in detail my concerns in opposition
letters to SMVPC. Conflicts of interest are defined in the Village Planning Handbook page 8, and City of Phoenix Ethics
Handbook‐ Employees & Volunteers page 9




Page1 716
Source: https://www.phoenix.gov/villagessite/Documents/pdd_pz_pdf_00020.pdf#search=village%20planning%20handbook
Accessed January 11, 2022




Page2 717
Source:https://www.phoenix.gov/citymanagersite/Documents/Ethics/Ethics_Handbook_Employee_Volunteers.pdf
Accessed: January 11, 2022

During the last meeting, I asked a general question to SMVPC:
“How will you know how much amending and rezoning is too much”?


Page3 718
The Village Planning Committee handbook, on pages 6 ‐8, identifies some key points to consider for land use map
amendments and rezoning.

Is there a conflict between the proposed land use and physical constraints or the environmental sensitivity of the area?
Yes, the issue is well‐documented with increased traffic, increased heat, flooding problems, and reduced capacity for
emergency vehicles restricted by one‐lane roads (19th Avenue and Dobbins Road). The impact of emergency vehicles
should not be under‐estimated. The project has only one entry.

How does the proposed change affect the underlying character of the area?
Yes, there is a demonstrated negative impact to access the 19th Avenue Trail in South Mountain park because of
increased congestion, traffic, reduced views, loss of space in the surrounding areas.

Does the proposed land use have any positive or negative impacts on goals and policies within the general plan?
Yes, there is a negative impact because it reduces the capacity to carry out the portions of PlanPHX (2015) and the 2025
Food Action Plan.

Many residents, including myself, carefully study zoning before making the decision to purchase a home. South
Mountain’s excessive rezoning and amending the GPA is a broken promise. The opportunity cost for excessive
development in South Mountain, including Andora, is too high. The Planning Commission and South Mountain Village
Planning Committee are deviating from smart growth. Whoever has the most expensive attorneys are
winning. Developers are bulldozing & paving their way to profit with little regard to opposition and real concerns about
quality‐of‐life and preservation of existing zoning. Phoenix is poised to be an agricultural hub and food innovation
center. The South Mountain Village (District 8) is ideally suited to be part of this longer‐term infrastructure. Again, I am
"Pro‐Development" and there is too much higher‐density development, too fast, and not balanced by smart
growth. These case items have immense opposition from the community and should NOT be approved.

Sincerely,

Dean Chiarelli


Dean Chiarelli, MA, RDN, CEP, CHES, REHS
Clinical Assistant Professor



500 North 3rd Street | Phoenix, AZ 85004
Ph: 602.496.1867 | dean.chiarelli@asu.edu
https://nursingandhealth.asu.ed [nursingandhealth.asu.edu]




Page4 719
Racelle Escolar

From: Hegedus, Erin
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2022 3:04 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8



I am very concerned about overall the development of this area, this area if developed, should be done I a way
that would enhance the neighborhood not to just bring in more housing, regardless of infrastructure that
does not support all of the growth.

Equally concerning is something I want to bring to your attention.

Southwest Phoenix in the 85041 area is the only remaining agriculture that is left in the city. Up until recently,
these fields were growing corn, cotton, alfalfa. Recently a number of developers are asking to rezone to build
homes. Modifying the density to up to 4 homes per acre with block walls.

Our neighbors have been fighting to retain the rural characteristics of the neighborhood but the Planning
Commissions seems to be pro development and support the housing proposals without regard to the
neighbors that have live with the extra housing that brings noise, traffic, night lights that obscure the starts,
heat and other nuisances.

Respectfully,

Erin Hegedus
8630 South 19th Avenue
Phoenix, AZ 85041



This transmission, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
information that is confidential, proprietary, legally privileged, or otherwise protected by law from disclosure. Any
unauthorized review, use, copying, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, or the
person responsible for delivering this to an addressee, you should notify the sender immediately by telephone or by
reply e‐mail, and destroy all copies of the original message.




Page1 720
From: Dorothy Hallock
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: Opposition to Andora
Date: Tuesday, February 1, 2022 1:38:28 PM




I am opposed to GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8, the proposed Andora development by K. Hovnanian.

The project entry on W. South Mountain Ave. would create a hazard because of significantly increased traffic on a
one lane road used by pedestrians (including school children), cyclists, and equestrians.

The proposed density and design are completely out of character with adjacent properties and the neighborhood.

I request time to speak, but donate my time to Zach Brooks.

Respectfully,
Dorothy Hallock
2050 W. South Mountain Ave.
Phoenix, AZ 85041



Sent from my iPhone




Page 721
Racelle Escolar

From: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: FW: Planning Commission meeting comments for 2/2/22 - Opposition to cases GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8,
item #6 and #7



From: H. Jewel Clark
Sent: Tuesday, February 1, 2022 2:42 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Planning Commission meeting comments for 2/2/22 ‐ Opposition to cases GPA‐SM‐3‐21‐8 and Z‐58‐21‐8, item #6 and #7

I am writing in opposition to Agenda items 6 and 7, cases GPA‐SM‐3‐21‐8 and Z‐58‐21‐8. The immediate area around the property requesting
rezoning from S‐1 to R1‐10 is S‐1 active agriculture and horse properties, plus acre+ lots with custom homes. The highest density currently built is
to R1‐18 across the street. Our area has followed the guidelines laid out in the Rio Montana Plan and the 2015 Phoenix General Plan (which
upholds the design guidelines of the Rio Montana Plan) and those guidelines call for:

 Lower density south of Baseline and towards South Mountain Park
 New construction should fit in with the surrounding neighborhoods‐ contextualism
 New construction should follow certain design guidelines like no 'garagescaping', unique housing designs, staggered lot sizes, open
fencing, open spaces, etc. ‐ certainty of character

The proposed plan by K Hovnanian follows none of those guidelines. They seek to plop the same cookie‐cutter style houses crammed onto tiny lots
that can be found anywhere in the Valley with no regard to the neighborhood that is already in place. They argue that Phoenix needs new homes.
They argue that the development across the street is positioned to have their zoning approved at R1‐10.

 Phoenix will not be a livable city if you continue to let developers gobble up land without regard to the development requirements the
city is supposed to uphold.
o You have the obligation to require this
 Existing residents have lost faith in the process to protect their properties from inappropriate development.
o You have the power to restore it
 Existing residents should have more say in what their neighborhoods look like than developers.
o Help us

You aren't going to solve the housing shortage with indiscriminate development.

The city is supposed to encourage diversity of development. There is no diversity when every piece of open property is getting rezoned for higher
and higher density that is better suited closer to the city core. Larger properties and agricultural land is being gobbled up and it's now rare and
precious. It should be preserved. There is plenty of high density property in the valley. Help us protect the low density property that remains.

As a united neighborhood, we didn't want the other development to be rezoned. If we'd possessed the power to stop it, we would have. We don't
want this property rezoned. This density is utterly incompatible with the surrounding homes and properties. The proposed housing designs do not
fit with our area.

Neighborhoods are at a complete disadvantage here. We don't have deep pockets. Lawyers won't even represent us b/c they don't want to make
developers angry and lose out on business. We're not land use experts. We all have other jobs besides fighting for our neighborhoods. We deserve
and need your help to make Phoenix development something to be proud of. We understand development is inevitable. But it can be done well or
poorly. It should be done with the support of the existing neighbors. We already live here. We deserve to be listened to. We don't want this
development. Please vote no on both cases. Thank you.

Jewel Clark
2020 West South Mountain Ave.
Phoenix, AZ 85041

‐‐
H. Jewel Clark
hjewelclark@fastmail.com




Page1 722
Racelle Escolar

From: JoAnne Jensen
Sent: Tuesday, February 1, 2022 5:24 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8/ Andora



Hello – thank you for taking my comments with respect to the proposed K Hovnanian development on the southwest
corner of 19th Avenue and South Mountain.

I join others in opposing rezoning the parcel from S‐1 to R1‐10, along with the plans for the development itself. S‐1 is
active agriculture and horse property with lots one acre or more and in no way either follows the guidelines in the Rio
Montana Plan and the 2015 Phoenix General Plan (which match one another). Specifically, these two plans call for
lower density south of Baseline toward South Mountain Park; new construction that fits in with the currently in place
surrounding neighborhoods; and new construction that involves unique housing designs, staggered lot sizes, open
fencing, open spaces and other hallmarks of a unified character.

Unfortunately, this K Hovnanian proposal follows none of those guidelines with cookie‐cutter style homes on small lots –
like so much other development in the Valley. There is nothing that distinguishes this set of homes nor do they fit with
the existing homes.

Preservation versus development is difficult, particularly in an environment when there is a housing shortage. There are
locations which are well suited to dense development – but South Mountain is not one of them. This is a rural /
agricultural / equestrian community. Those of us who live here have purposely chosen a country lifestyle and dense /
bland looking homes on small lots is development incompatible with this section of Phoenix.

To be honest, as people who live here, we would like to have a say in the appearance and development of our
neighborhood and to know that our voices will carry some weight in these matters. We do not oppose development –
everything changes, but we would like to feel we have a seat at the table when these decisions are made, and that
developers are not allowed carte blanche.

In sum, please oppose this development in its current configuration. We are working with this developer to try to find
common ground – a suggestion is to continue these requests until an agreement can be reached, at which time this
Commission can evaluate a plan which has agreement on both sides.

Thank you.

JoAnne Jensen
480‐213‐6499
8303 S. 17th Drive
Phoenix AZ 85041




Page1 723
Attachment G


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
February 3, 2022

ITEM NO: 7
DISTRICT NO.: 8
SUBJECT:

Application #: Z-58-21-8 (Continued from 1/6/2022)
Location: Southwest corner of 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue
From: S-1 (Approved R1-18)
To: R1-10
Acreage: 20.76
Proposal: Detached single-family residential
Applicant: Paul Gilbert, Beus Gilbert McGroder, PLLC
Owner: P.W. Again, LLC
Representative: Paul Gilbert, Beus Gilbert McGroder, PLLC

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
South Mountain 12/14/2021 Continued. Vote: 11-0.
South Mountain 1/11/2022 Denial. Vote: 9-4 (1 abstained).

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Addendum C Staff Report.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Commissioner Johnson made a MOTION to approve Z-58-21-8, per the
Addendum C Staff Report.

Maker: Johnson
Second: Gaynor
Vote: 6-2 (Busching, Perez)
Absent: None
Opposition Present: Yes

Findings:

1. This proposed development provides a housing option that is consistent with
development patterns in the general area.

2. As stipulated, the proposed development is generally consistent with design policies
and the intent of the Rio Montaña Area Plan.

3. This proposed development is appropriately located at the intersection of an arterial
and minor collector street, and in proximity to transit service located along Baseline
Road.




Page 724
Stipulations:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date stamped
November 22, 2021 JANUARY 3, 2022, JANUARY 11, 2022, FEBRUARY 2, 2022, as
modified by the following stipulations and approved by the Planning and Development
Department with specific regard to the following:

a. The development shall be limited to a maximum of 67 66 63 52 lots.


b. Lots 1 through 14 7, 13 THROUGH 27, AND LOTS 62 58 THROUGH 66 63
shall be a minimum of 65 feet in width.

c. Lots 15, 16, 17 and 49 8 THROUGH 13 shall be a minimum of 60 feet in width.


d. Lots 50 14 28 through 67 28 31 AND LOT 61 shall be a minimum of 70 feet in
C. width.

e. All other lots shall be a minimum of 50 60 75 feet in width.
D.
B.

f. Lots shall be a minimum of 45 feet from the southern perimeter property line.
E.
C.


g. Lots shall be a minimum of 25 50 feet from the western perimeter property line.
F.
D.

h. A minimum 10-foot wide landscape setback shall be provided along the
G. southern and western perimeter of the site.
E.

i. The location of the open space areas.
H.
F.

j. A minimum of 17 percent of the gross site area, exclusive of required
I. landscape setbacks, shall be provided as open space.
G.

k. A minimum building setback of 50 feet, exclusive of fencing, entry features or
J. detached accessory structures, shall be provided along the northern and
H. eastern perimeter of the site along 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue.




Page 725
l. A minimum 25-foot wide landscape setback shall be provided along 19th
K. Avenue and South Mountain Avenue. The landscape setback may be reduced
I. to 20 feet for up to 50 percent of this frontage for the purpose of staggering the
perimeter theme wall.

M. FULL INGRESS AND EGRESS TO THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE LIMITED
L. TO SOUTH MOUNTAIN AVENUE 19TH AVENUE.
J.

2. All landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 50-percent 2-inch caliper and
50-percent 3-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings, with five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

3. The maximum building height for lots 1 through 17 and lots 49 through 67, as depicted
on the site plan date stamped November 22, 2021, shall be limited to one story and 20
22 feet.

4. All lots in the development shall be subject to Single-Family Design Review, including
lots that are wider than 65 feet, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

5. Building elevations shall be developed to the following standards, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department:

a. Building elevations shall contain multiple colors, exterior accent materials and
textural changes that exhibit quality and durability such as brick, stone, colored
textured concrete or stucco, or other materials to provide a decorative and
aesthetic treatment.

b. A minimum of 50 percent of the elevations for each floor plan shall provide a
covered front porch in the front yard with a minimum of 60 square feet in area
at a depth of at least six feet. No porch shall terminate within the plane of a
door or window.

c. Pitched roofs shall be provided on all primary building elevations.

6. Fences and wall are subject to the following stipulations, in addition to the Zoning
Ordinance requirements, and approved by the Planning and Development
Department. FENCES AND WALLS SHALL BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH
THE SITE WALL ELEVATIONS DATE STAMPED DECEMBER 23, 2021 JANUARY
11, 2022 AND SITE WALL PLAN DATE STAMPED JANUARY 3, 2022, JANUARY 11,
2022 FEBRUARY 2, 2022, AS MODIFIED BY THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS,
AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT:

a. Full open view fencing, WHICH MAY INCLUDE SOLID COLUMNS UP TO 24
INCHES IN WIDTH, shall be utilized where walls are proposed around open
space areas adjacent to a perimeter public street.

b. Where view fencing is required by the Zoning Ordinance, a combination of solid
masonry wall and view fencing may be utilized. The solid portion of the wall


Page 726
shall not exceed 4 feet in height, or as otherwise required by a City or County
barrier regulation. THE WALL LAYOUT DEPICTED IN THE WALL PLAN
SHALL BE MODIFIED WHERE NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE SITE
LAYOUT CHANGES THAT AVOID CONFLICTS WITH THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OR CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS.

c. Perimeter walls bounding the rear yard property lines of residential lots along
19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue shall include minimum three-foot
offsets and material and textural differences, such as stucco, and/or split face
OR SLUMP block or a decorative element, such as tile or stamped designs, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

7. Project entry/exit drives along 19th Avenue and South Mountain 19TH Avenue shall
incorporate decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or similar alternative
material, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. Project entry/exit drives along 19th Avenue and South Mountain 19TH Avenue shall
incorporate enhanced landscaping on both sides planted with a variety of at least three
plant materials, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. Each
landscaped area shall be a minimum of 250-square feet.

9. A system of pedestrian connections shall be provided, to connect the following as
described below and as approved by the Planning and Development Department:

a. Amenity areas.

b. Sidewalks.

c. Pedestrian path connecting the northern PRIMARY AMENITY AREA and
southern WITH THE SOUTHERN AND WESTERN portions of the site via a
centralized pathway.

d. The common open space tract along the southwest corner of 19th Avenue and
South Mountain Avenue shall contain a minimum 8-foot wide pedestrian
pathway that connects the development with the sidewalk at 19th Avenue or
South Mountain Avenue near the street intersection. This pathway shall be
constructed of decomposed stabilized granite, decorative pavers, stamped or
colored concrete, or similar alternative material. The landscaped tract shall
contain minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees planted a minimum of 25 feet on
center or equivalent groupings, along both sides of the pedestrian pathway.

E. PEDESTRIAN ACCESS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG VEHICULAR
ACCESS POINTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT. THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS BY
ACCESSIBLE SIDEWALKS.

10. No more than 50 percent of the landscape areas within common areas or 10 percent
of the net development area whichever is less, should be planted in turf or high-water
use plants. Turf areas should be located only in the common open space areas,
including retention basins, as approved by the Planning and Development




Page 727
Department. This requirement does not apply to landscaping located within private
yards on individual lots.

11. The following shall be provided IN THE CENTRAL AMENITY AREA and/OR dispersed
throughout the development, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department:

a. Tot lot with shade equipment;

b. One picnic area with a barbeque grill, shade ramada and a picnic table; and

c. Two benches or seating features.

12. The sidewalk along 19th Avenue shall be a minimum of five feet in width and detached
with a minimum 13-foot wide landscape strip located between the sidewalk and back
of curb and planted to the following standards, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant shade trees
planted 25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings that provide shade to a
minimum 75 percent at maturity.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian
environment.

13. All sidewalks along South Mountain Avenue shall be detached with a minimum five-
foot wide landscape strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb and planted
to the following standards, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant shade trees
planted 25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings that provide shade to a
minimum 75 percent at maturity.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian
environment.

14. The developer shall dedicate 50-feet of right-of-way and construct the west half of 19th
Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

15. The developer shall provide conduit and junction boxes at 19th Avenue and South
Mountain Avenue for future traffic signal equipment on the southwest corner of the
intersection. All work related to the construction or reconstruction of the conduit runs
and junction box installation shall be the responsibility of the Developer.




Page 728
16. Existing irrigation facilities along 19th Avenue are to be undergrounded and relocated
outside of City of Phoenix right-of-way. Contact SRP to identify existing land rights and
establish appropriate process to relocate facility. Relocations that require additional
dedications or land transfer require completion prior to obtaining plat and/or civil plan
review approval.

17. The developer shall underground all existing electrical utilities located within the public
right-of-way that are impacted/ or need to be relocated as part of this project.
Coordinate with the affected utility companies for their review and permitting.

18. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping
and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

19. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development the existence and
operational characteristics of agricultural uses. These documents must advise
purchasers that, under Section 3-112(E), Arizona Revised Statutes, the City of Phoenix
may not declare an agricultural operation conducted on farmland to be a nuisance if
the agricultural use is lawful, customary, reasonable, safe and necessary to the
agriculture industry. The form and content of such documents shall be reviewed and
approved by the City prior to recordation.

20. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development the existence and
operational characteristics of the Phoenix Regional Police Academy gun range. The
form and content of such documents shall be reviewed by the City prior to recordation.

21. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or tenants
of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

22. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of Phoenix
Aviation Department for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City
Attorney prior to final site plan approval.

23. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed development
from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction analysis review process,
prior to construction permit approval, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

24. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the Archeology
Office to properly assess the materials.

25. IN ADDITION TO THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK, A MINIMUM 8-FOOT-WIDE
PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY OR TRAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED AND MAINTAINED
WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT ALONG 19TH AVENUE AND SOUTH MOUNTAIN



Page 729
AVENUE, CONSTRUCTED OF DECOMPOSED GRANITE OR SIMILAR
ALTERNATIVE MATERIAL, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE DEVELOPER SHALL DEDICATE A MULTI-
USE TRAIL EASEMENT (MUTE) ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF 19TH AVENUE AND
SOUTH SIDE OF SOUTH MOUNTAIN AVENUE AND CONSTRUCT A MINIMUM 10-
FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL (MUT) WITHIN THE EASEMENT IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE MAG SUPPLEMENTAL DETAIL, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE DEVELOPER SHALL WORK WITH THE
SITE PLANNING SECTION ON AN ALTERNATE DESIGN FOR THIS
REQUIREMENT THROUGH THE TECHNICAL APPEAL PROCESS.

26. THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE 3 DIFFERENT FRONT YARD PALETTES
CONSISTING OF ONE TWO LARGE CANOPY ACCENT TREES, FIVE SHRUBS
AND TURF OR GROUND COVER, OR OFFER EVIDENCE OF A LANDSCAPING
INCENTIVE PACKAGE, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. REQUIRED FRONT YARD TREES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2-
INCH CALIPER SIZE AND LOCATED TO PROVIDE THE MAXIMUM SHADE
POSSIBLE TO SIDEWALKS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT, AS APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

27. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT ONE BUS STOP PAD ALONG
SOUTHBOUND 19TH AVENUE. THE BUS STOP PAD SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
ACCORDING TO CITY OF PHOENIX STANDARD DETAIL P1260 WITH A MINIMUM
DEPTH OF 10 FEET AND SHALL BE SPACED FROM THE INTERSECTION OF
SOUTH MOUNTAIN AVENUE ACCORDING TO CITY OF PHOENIX STANDARD
DETAIL P1258.

28. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER SHALL
EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE WAIVER SHALL
BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE AND
DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REZONING APPLICATION
FILE FOR RECORD.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.






Page 730
Attachment H

Racelle Escolar

From: JoAnne Jensen
Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 4:32 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: RE: GPA-SM-3-21-8 and Z-58-21-8/ Andora



Hello – it has come to my attention that the stipulations and site plan for Andora have been modified to reflect the
agreement between our neighbors and the developer.

As a result, would it be possible to please withdraw my comments and my opposition, as they are now moot.

Thank you very much.

JoAnne Jensen
8303 So 17th Drive
Phoenix AZ 85041
480‐213‐6499

From: JoAnne Jensen
Sent: Tuesday, February 1, 2022 5:24 PM
To: 'pdd.planningcomm@phoenix.gov'
Subject: GPA‐SM‐3‐21‐8 and Z‐58‐21‐8/ Andora

Hello – thank you for taking my comments with respect to the proposed K Hovnanian development on the southwest
corner of 19th Avenue and South Mountain.

I join others in opposing rezoning the parcel from S‐1 to R1‐10, along with the plans for the development itself. S‐1 is
active agriculture and horse property with lots one acre or more and in no way either follows the guidelines in the Rio
Montana Plan and the 2015 Phoenix General Plan (which match one another). Specifically, these two plans call for
lower density south of Baseline toward South Mountain Park; new construction that fits in with the currently in place
surrounding neighborhoods; and new construction that involves unique housing designs, staggered lot sizes, open
fencing, open spaces and other hallmarks of a unified character.

Unfortunately, this K Hovnanian proposal follows none of those guidelines with cookie‐cutter style homes on small lots –
like so much other development in the Valley. There is nothing that distinguishes this set of homes nor do they fit with
the existing homes.

Preservation versus development is difficult, particularly in an environment when there is a housing shortage. There are
locations which are well suited to dense development – but South Mountain is not one of them. This is a rural /
agricultural / equestrian community. Those of us who live here have purposely chosen a country lifestyle and dense /
bland looking homes on small lots is development incompatible with this section of Phoenix.

To be honest, as people who live here, we would like to have a say in the appearance and development of our
neighborhood and to know that our voices will carry some weight in these matters. We do not oppose development –
everything changes, but we would like to feel we have a seat at the table when these decisions are made, and that
developers are not allowed carte blanche.

In sum, please oppose this development in its current configuration. We are working with this developer to try to find
common ground – a suggestion is to continue these requests until an agreement can be reached, at which time this
Commission can evaluate a plan which has agreement on both sides.


Page1 731
Thank you.

JoAnne Jensen
480‐213‐6499
8303 S. 17th Drive
Phoenix AZ 85041




Page2 732

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

64 item(s)