Vote — approved

Clint Hickman	yes
Jack Sellers	yes
Thomas Galvin	yes
Bill Gates	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes

Ayes: Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, Bill Gates, Steve Gallardo

Item Text

11. FARM BRO’S TOY STORAGE Case #: MCP2022006 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant & Owners: Steve MaGill , MBM Business Planners / Janice and Lomand Beals Request: Military Compatibility Permit (MCP) with Plan of Development for RV/Boat storage in the Rural-43 MAAMF zoning district (LDN 70 noise contour) Site Location: Generally located 2,500’ west of the SWC of Peoria Ave. and Litchfield Rd. in the Waddell area Commission Recommendation: On 4/20/23, the Commission voted 7-0 to adopt a motion recomm ending the Board of Supervisors approve MCP2022006 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘e’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled “Farm Bro’s Toy Storage“ , consisting of 2 full-size sheets, dated January 16, 20 23, and stamped received January 17, 2023, except as modified by the following conditions. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Farm Bro’s Toy Storage Narrative”, consisting of 3 pages, dated J anuary , and stamped received January 17, 2023, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All devel opment and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, sta ndards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 2. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the site’s drainage infrastructure. 3. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Site Infrastructure) Plans must be submitted with the application for Building Permits 4. At the time of the Building Permit identify that there will be space between the ground and the bottom of the metal fence to allow the water to outfall into the retention basin 5. Any Constructi on done in the MCDOT Right-of-Way must have a MCDOT Right-of-Way Permit. 6. Any Construction done in the City of Surprise Right-of-Way must have a Surprise Right-of-Way Permit 7. Peoria Avenue is classified as a Principal Arterial. Driveways connecting to arterial or major collector streets are to have adequate turnaround space on the private property or a circular driveway to eliminate backing onto the roadway. d. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the cer tificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. e. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approv al allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on t he date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and th at there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the MCP. The MCP enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the MCP is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the MCP had never been granted. (C-44-23-250-X-00)

Attachments (1)