Vote — approved

Clint Hickman	yes
Jack Sellers	yes
Thomas Galvin	yes
Bill Gates	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes

Ayes: Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, Bill Gates, Steve Gallardo

Item Text

10. LORIMOR Case #: MCP2022004 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant & Owner: Philip Woolbright , A & B Homes Inc. / Ellis Lorimor Request: Military Compatibility Permit (MCP) with Plan of Development for RV, boat, semi, and farm equipment storage, material and part storage, trash and debris storage, machinery repair, and 24/7 site security in the Rural – 43 MAAMF district within the LDN 80 noise contour. Per Arizona Revised Statutes the proposed land use has been deemed to be compatible and consistent with the high noise or accident potential zone of a Military Airport or Ancillary Military Facility. Site Location: Generally Located 560’ east and 610’ south of the SEC of Olive Ave. and 142nd Ave. in the Glendale Area Commission Recommendation: On 4/20/23, the Commission voted 7-0 to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve MCP2022004 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘g’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled “Vehicle Storage Facility“ , consisting of 2 full-size sheets, dated November 11, 2022, and stamp ed received February 16, 2023, except as modified by the following conditions. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Assessor Parcel Number 501-42-975”, consisting of 4 pages, dated February 16, 2023 and stamped received February 16, 2023 except as modified by the following conditions. c. In accordance with the UCCD, and as required by Superior Court Order, State Statute, and the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance the following MCP uses will be al lowed to occur on the property: 1. Uncovered parking and repair services for vehicles such as farming and construction equipment, recreational vehicles, and boats. 2. Storage of aggregate materials such as sand, millings, dirt, firewood, trash piles for haul away, concrete, lumber, and roofing products. d. The following Rural-43 MAAMF MCP standards shall apply: 1. Max. Height: 30’ 2. Min. Rear Setback: 5’ 3. Sight Visibility Triangle: None Required e. The following Planning Engineering conditions sh all apply: 1. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 if the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Fl oodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 2. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the site’s drainage infrastructure. 3. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Site Infrastructure) Plans and Drainage Report must be submitted with the application for Bu ilding Permits. f. Outdoor storage (including parking of heavy vehicles) above the height of screening shall be set back an additional 1’ from all setback lines for every 1’ of additional height above screening. g. The granting of this change in use of t he property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. Failure to comply with conditions after a reasonable opportunity to bring the property into compliance may result in the initiation of revocation at a public hearing. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that revocation due to the failure to comply wi th any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the MCP. The MCP enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the MCP is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the MCP had never been granted. (C-44-23-251-X-00)

Attachments (1)