Vote — approved

Thomas Galvin	yes
Kate Brophy McGee	yes
Mark Stewart	yes
Debbie Lesko	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes

Ayes: Thomas Galvin, Kate Brophy McGee, Mark Stewart, Debbie Lesko, Steve Gallardo

Item Text

9. WITTMANN STORAGE Case #: Z2024060 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant & Owners: Bill Dougherty, Viking Development Inc. / Van Pelt Land & Livestock LLC Request: Zone Change from Rural-43 WHSC & C-2 WHSC to C-2 CUPD WHSC with a plan of development Site Location: Generally located NWC of Grand Ave frontage & US Hwy 60 in the Wittmann area Commission Recommendation: On 1/23/25, the Commission voted 4-0 (motion by Commissioner Montoya D5, seconded by Commissioner Curley D3) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve Z2024060 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘h’: a. A Plan of Development is approved subject to site plan entitled “Wittmann Storage” consisting of 1 full-size sheet, dated revised September 3, 2024. The Plan of Development may be amended administratively under separate application as long as the amendment complies with the established CUPD development standards as approved by the Board of Supervisors. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Wittman Storage Narrative”, consisting of 4 pages, dated November 14, 2024, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The CUPD shall limit entitled uses to indoor self-storage facilities and accessory residential caretaker unit. The total number of residential dwelling units (caretaker’s quarters) shall not exceed one (1). d. The following C-2 CUPD standards shall apply: 1. Min. Front yard setback - 5’ 2. Min. Side yard setback – 5’ 3. Min. Street-side yard setback – 5’ 4. Min. Rear yard setback – 5’ Min. Parking - 1:200 sq. ft. of office space – no screening requirements, 1 per dwelling unit, 0 spaces required for self-storage space with garage-door entrance to an internal drive-aisle. 5. Minimum Screening – Chain link e. The following engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 2. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout and/or a reduction in the number of building lots may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the subdivision drainage infrastructure. 3. Site in a Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs). Disturbance to any floodplain will require a floodplain use permit concurrent with building permit. 4. Finished floors must be set to or above the Regulator Flood Elevation determined by the engineer 5. Applicant to notify ADOT of proposed development through the Red-Letter Process, RedLetter@azdot.gov , due to proximity to US60 6. Driveway access to County Road(s) must be paved and will require a permit from MCDOT issued concurrent with building permit(s) required for site development. Drainage flow along the roadway must be maintained. 7. Storage of materials, walls/fence, parking and storm water retention are prohibited in the right-of-way. 8. Retention basins/underground storage to drain within 36 hours 9. Prior to Building permit issuance, a will serve letter for fire protection services must be provided. f. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. g. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. h. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Zone Change had never been granted. (C-44-25-081-X-00)

Attachments (1)

Vote — approved

Thomas Galvin	yes
Kate Brophy McGee	yes
Mark Stewart	yes
Debbie Lesko	yes
Steve Gallardo	absent

Ayes: Thomas Galvin, Kate Brophy McGee, Mark Stewart, Debbie Lesko Absent: Steve Gallardo

Item Text

6. WITTMANN STORAGE Case #: Z2024060 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant & Owners: Bill Dougherty, Viking Development Inc. / Van Pelt Land & Livestock LLC Request: Zone Change from Rural-43 WHSC & C-2 WHSC to C-2 CUPD WHSC with a plan of development Site Location: Generally located NWC of Grand Ave frontage & US Hwy 60 in the Wittmann area Commission Recommendation: On 1/23/25, the Commission voted 4-0 (motion by Commissioner Montoya D5, seconded by Commissioner Curley D3) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve Z2024060 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘h’: a. A Plan of Development is approved subject to site plan entitled “Wittmann Storage” consisting of 1 full-size sheet, dated revised September 3, 2024. The Plan of Development may be amended administratively under separate application as long as the amendment complies with the established CUPD development standards as approved by the Board of Supervisors. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Wittman Storage Narrative”, consisting of 4 pages, dated November 14, 2024, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The CUPD shall limit entitled uses to indoor self-storage facilities and accessory residential caretaker unit. The total number of residential dwelling units (caretaker’s quarters) shall not exceed one (1). d. The following C-2 CUPD standards shall apply: 1. Min. Front yard setback - 5’ 2. Min. Side yard setback – 5’ 3. Min. Street-side yard setback – 5’ 4. Min. Rear yard setback – 5’ Min. Parking - 1:200 sq. ft. of office space – no screening requirements, 1 per dwelling unit, 0 spaces required for self-storage space with garage-door entrance to an internal drive-aisle. 5. Minimum Screening – Chain link e. The following engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 2. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout and/or a reduction in the number of building lots may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the subdivision drainage infrastructure. 3. Site in a Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs). Disturbance to any floodplain will require a floodplain use permit concurrent with building permit. 4. Finished floors must be set to or above the Regulator Flood Elevation determined by the engineer 5. Applicant to notify ADOT of proposed development through the Red-Letter Process, RedLetter@azdot.gov , due to proximity to US60 6. Driveway access to County Road(s) must be paved and will require a permit from MCDOT issued concurrent with building permit(s) required for site development. Drainage flow along the roadway must be maintained. 7. Storage of materials, walls/fence, parking and storm water retention are prohibited in the right-of-way. 8. Retention basins/underground storage to drain within 36 hours 9. Prior to Building permit issuance, a will serve letter for fire protection services must be provided. f. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. g. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. h. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Zone Change had never been granted. (C-44-25-081-X-00)

Attachments (2)