Vote — approved

Kate Brophy McGee	yes
Mark Stewart	yes
Debbie Lesko	yes
Thomas Galvin	abstain
Steve Gallardo	abstain

Ayes: Kate Brophy McGee, Mark Stewart, Debbie Lesko, Steve Gallardo Recused: Thomas Galvin

Item Text

13. ROOSEVELT LOGISTICS CENTER Case #: Z250022 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant and Owners: Jack Gilmore, Gilmore Planning & Landscaping Architecture / Roosevelt Logistics Center QOZB, LLC Request: Zone Change from Rural-43 to IND-2 IUPD Site Location: Generally located about 1,260’ west of the SWC of Roosevelt St. and 339th Ave in the Tonopah area Commission Recommendation: On 11/06/25, the Commission voted 8-0 (motion by Commissioner Hernandez D5, seconded by Commissioner Rochwalik D3) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve Z250022 subject to conditions ‘a’ to ‘k’. a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Zoning Exhibit entitled “Roosevelt Logistics Center“, consisting of 1 full-size sheets, dated June 10, 2024 and stamped received June 12, 2024, except as modified by the following conditions. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. Except for Major Amendment case Z250022, the site shall be in substantial compliance with zoning exhibit entitled “Roosevelt Logistics Center” consisting of one (1) full size sheet stamped received September 3, 2025 and the narrative report entitled “Roosevelt Logistics Center” consisting of twenty six (26) pages dated August 29, 2025 and stamped received September 3, 2025. b. Prior to approval of construction permits on site, the applicant shall submit to the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department confirmation of both water and sewer service to the site. c. Prior to Plan of Development approval, the subject properties shall be reconfigured via the platting or minor land combination/division process to reflect the parcels as shown on the zoning exhibit. d. Prior to approval of construction permits for the site documentation of compliance to the Arizona Game and Fish Department recommendations provided in the report dated May 29, 2024 and comment letter dated June 10th, 2024 must be provided to the Planning and Development Department. e. Indigenous Sonoran plant species shall be used as a landscape buffer to the Dickey Wash in accordance with a landscape plan submitted to and acceptable to the Planning and Development Department as part of the Plan of Development. f. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. An updated Traffic Impact Study must be submitted with future entitlement application(s) (i.e. Plan of Development) 2. The owner/application shall be responsible for the procurement of access rights and preparation of development plans to provide primary and emergency access to the site. 3. The emergency access must be approved by ADOT prior to the issuance of building permits on the site. 4. Without the submittal of a precise plan of development, no development approval is inferred by this review, including, but not limited to number of proposed buildings, drainage design, access and driveway alignments, These items will be addressed as development plans progress and area submitted to the county for further review and/or entitlement. 5. Engineering review a zone change / rezoning cases is conceptual in nature. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. g. The following Maricopa County Department of Transportation conditions shall apply: 1. Determination of ultimate right-of-way dedication and/or ultimate improvement of Roosevelt Street (INCLUSIVE OF ANY BRIDGE/CULVERT OVER DICKEY WASH) will be determined by MCDOT based upon traffic studies to be submitted with each Plan of Development. 2. Determination of ultimate right-of-way dedication and/or ultimate improvement of the 339th Avenue intersection will be determined by MCDOT based upon traffic studies to be submitted with each Plan of Development. h. The following IUPD standards shall apply: 1. Max. Building height: 60’ 2. Min. front setback (adjacent to Roosevelt St.): 100’ 3. Min. setback (from lot line of Dickey Wash): 100’ 4. Min. side setback (east lot line): 10’ 5. Min. rear setback:10’ 6. Minimum landscape buffers: a. From Roosevelt St.: 25’ b. From I-10: 20’ c. East perimeter of the IUPD zoning district: 10’ 7. Min. screening: Screening requirements waived along western lot line adjacent to Dickey Wash (all other lot lines must meet zoning ordinance screening requirements) 8. Parking (wholesale and manufacturing): one stall per 1,500 sq. ft. 9. Parking (warehouse/distribution): one stall per 3,500 sq. ft. 10. Max. free-standing sign height: 48’ 11. Max. free-standing sign area: 180 sq. ft 12. Prohibited uses: Off-site Advertising Signs (Billboards) i. Administrative approval of a Plan of Development will be required prior to approval and issuance of construction permits to develop and establish use of the site. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. j. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the zone change with overlay. The zone change with overlay enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the zone change with overlay is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the zone change with overlay had never been granted. k. Noncompliance with any of the conditions assigned to the approval of this zone change with overlay by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors may be grounds for revocation in accordance with the requirements and procedures as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. (C-44-26-051-X-00)