Vote — approved

Kate Brophy McGee	yes
Debbie Lesko	yes
Mark Stewart	yes
Thomas Galvin	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes

6.35 Acres A plat depicting the declared streets is attached. General Vicinity: 195th Avenue and Bethany Home Road, lying within Supervisorial District 4, in an unincorporated area. In addition, direct the Clerk of the Board to record the Board of Supervisors resolution with the County Recorder. (C-64-26-136-X-00) Motion to approve by Supervisor Debbie Lesko, seconded by Supervisor Mark Stewart Ayes: Kate Brophy McGee, Debbie Lesko, Mark Stewart, Thomas Galvin, Steve Gallardo

Item Text

6. 330 S 75TH AVE – CLEAN HARBORS INDUSTRIAL (Supervisorial District: 5) Case #: Z250030 Applicant and Owner: Zach Hill, Kimley-Horn / Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc. Request: Zone Change from IND-3 to IND-3 IUPD Site Location: Generally located approx. 600’ north of the NWC of 75th Ave. & Lincoln St. in the Tolleson area Commission Recommendation: On 3/5/26, the Commission voted 6-0 (motion by Vice Chair Hernandez, D5, seconded by Commissioner Rochwalik, D3) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve Z250030 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘h’: a. A Plan of Development is approved subject to the site plan entitled, “Site Plan for 330 S 75th Avenue,” consisting of three full-size sheets, dated January 2026, and stamped received January 14, 2026. The Plan of Development may be amended administratively under a separate application as long as the amendment complies with the established IUPD development standards as approved by the Board of Supervisors. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled, “Narrative Report for 330 S 75th Ave / Clean Harbors Industrial Project,” consisting of 11 pages, dated January 12, 2026, and stamped received January 14, 2026, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Proposed Basin A is showing ~6 feet of ponding. Pool barrier-compliant fencing is required around any retention basin with ponding greater than 3 feet. 2. If alterations on any existing structure reach the 50% substantial improvement threshold, the entire structure must be brought into compliance with the Floodplain Use Regulations (i.e. FFE at or above the regulatory flood elevation or the structure must be floodproofed). 3. Any development in the floodplain will require a floodplain use permit issued concurrent with building permit(s) required for site development. The proposed maintenance building will be required to meet current floodplain regulations. 4. The subject premises is located within the County’s Urbanized Area and will disturb more than one (1) acre. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Permit (SWPPP), issued by the County (PND), will be required prior to issuance of any building permits required for site development. See: https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/6577. 5. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 905 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 6. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the drainage infrastructure. 7. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Infrastructure) Plans must be submitted with the application for Final Plat Approval and Building Permits. d. The following IND-3 IUPD standards shall apply: 1. Maximum Height: 60’ 2. Minimum Front Setback: 14’ 3. Minimum Side Setback: 0’ 4. Minimum Parking Spaces: 1 space per 1,000 square feet of floor area 5. Minimum Screening Required: Minimum 6’ chain-link fence. Building walls along the property line may substitute for fencing. 6. Screening Along 75th Ave.: Not required. Any screening improvements along 75th Ave. shall be subject to permitting and requirements of the City of Tolleson and/or the City of Phoenix, as applicable. 7. Sight Visibility Triangles: None required e. The applicant and/or property owner(s) shall coordinate with the City of Tolleson and/or the City of Phoenix, as applicable, for any improvements to site access and screening within, adjacent to, or otherwise affecting their jurisdictions. f. Noncompliance with any of the conditions assigned to the approval of this Zone Change by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors may be grounds for revocation in accordance with the requirements and procedures set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. g. The property owners and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. h. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property may be considered for revocation to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell, or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone Change / Plan of Development. The Zone Change / Plan of Development enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Zone Change / Plan of Development is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Zone Change / Plan of Development had never been granted. (C-44-26-090-X-00)

Attachments (1)