Vote — approved

Kate Brophy McGee	yes
Debbie Lesko	yes
Mark Stewart	yes
Thomas Galvin	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes

6.0 Extension, extend the term of the Agreement through June 30, 2027. The foregoing paragraphs contain all the changes made by this Amendment No. 8. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement and previously approved amendments remain in full force and effect. This Amendment shall become effective on the date of last signature. Contracts between the Arizona Department of Economic Security and the County are renewed annually on a non‑competitive basis. Upon issuance of funding alerts, as fun

Item Text

6. US-A-5292 (PHO) 355TH AVE (Supervisorial District: 4) Case #: SU250037 Applicant and Owner: Robin Walters, State 48 Consulting / Keith Wiseman Request: Special Use Permit (SUP) for a wireless communication facility (WCF) in the Rural-43 zoning district Site Location: Generally located approx. 200’ south and approx. 400’ west of the SWC of Roeser Road and Salome Highway in the Tonopah area Commission Recommendation: On 3/19/26, the Commission voted 6-0 (motion by Commissioner Milhaven D2, seconded by Commissioner Toma D4) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve SU250037 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘i’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled “Verizon: PHO_355th_AVE / Vertical Bridge: VB US-AZ-5292,” consisting of 8 full-size sheets, dated February 25, 2026, and stamped received February 27, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Project Narrative”, consisting of 6 pages, stamped received January 12, 2026, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 2. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the site’s drainage infrastructure. 3. Maricopa County does not supply water, fire or sewer services. It is the applicant/owner’s responsibility to coordinate and secure water, fire and sewer services for this site. 4. Any encroachment into the existing special flood hazard areas will require a flood use permit. Applicant is expected to maintain historical flow patterns. d. The maximum height of the Wireless Communication Facility shall be limited to 109’. e. A Minor Amendment shall be required to co-locate future carriers on the Wireless Communication Facility. f. This special use permit is valid for a period of 30 years and shall expire on April 22, 2056, or upon termination of the use for a period of 90 or more days, whichever occurs first. All site improvements associated with the special use permit shall be removed within 90 days of such expiration or termination of use. g. The following SUP standards shall apply: 1. Max. WCF Height: 109’ 2. Min. Setback from North Lot Line: 215’ 3. Min. Setback from East Lot Line: 210’ 4. Max. Tower Diameter: 3’ 5. Max. WCF Antenna Array Diameter: 16’ 6. Screening: Min. 6’ Chain-Link Fence h. Noncompliance with any of the conditions assigned to the approval of this Special Use Permit by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors may be grounds for revocation in accordance with the requirements and procedures as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. i. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, and at the time of expiration of the Special Use Permit, the property may be considered for revocation to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, or the expiration of the Special Use Permit, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation or expiration of the Special Use Permit. The Special Use Permit enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Special Use Permit is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Special Use Permit had never been granted. (C-44-26-094-X-00)

Attachments (1)