CI JUSTIFICATION - EDUCATION EVOLVING.VH_LKV3.PDF

Maricopa County — Formal (2023-06-14)

View PDF Item 31 Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 5549 characters
Office of Procurement Services 
GOODS AND SERVICES 
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FORM 
This form is to be used when a department believes an acquisition is considered Competition Impracticable and the acquisition 
dollar amount is above $10,000. The Chief Procurement Officer can approve purchases up to $100,000. Board of Supervisors 
approval is required if the acquisition is over $100,000. This form must be submitted for approval to: Office of Procurement 
Services | 301 W Jefferson Street Suite 700 | Phoenix, AZ 85003. Fax number: 602.506.6766. The signed form must be retained 
in the purchasing file. Unless approved by the Board of Supervisors in a formal agenda item or the Chief Procurement Officer in 
a formal Contract a CI form is valid from July 1 thru June 30th of each Fiscal Year. 
DEPARTMENT NAME 
DEPARTMENT RX# 
PROPOSED CONTRACT VENDOR 
NEED IDENTIFIED Date: 
REQUESTED DELIVERY 
Date: 
QUOTED PRICE: 
Accounting String: 
Company: 
Address: 
City, State: 
Zip/Postal Code: 
Phone: 
Fax: 
Contact Name: 
DESCRIPTION OF GOODS OR SERVICES REQUIRED: 
The estimated cost of this Procurement is: 
≤ $100k 
> $100k 
Is this a Technology Procurement? 
Yes 
No 
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE CATEGORY (Check applicable box, attach documentation or provide explanation below.)
Maricopa County Procurement Code MC1-351 states: “Competition Impracticable” means an acquisition where, competition is 
impractical because of standardization, warranty, or other factors as approved by the Board of Supervisors. 
NOTE:  The following are unlikely to be sufficient Competition Impracticable justifications: 
• Personal or department preference for a product or vendor
• Department perception that the vendor is the best qualified (this should be determined through a competitive process)
• Lack of department planning resulting in limited time to conduct a competitive procurement
• Special incentive or deal offered (can be assessed in open and competitive solicitation)
• Department  convenience
Grant specified (supporting documents attached) 
Mailing lists, subscriptions or media advertising 
Warranty voided if service provided by other contract vendor 
Other (Provide written explanation below) 
Software license renewals, additions, or upgrades available 
from only one source 
Brand compatibility available from only one source (no other 
distributors) 
Other proprietary situation 
County School Superintendent
Education Evolving
04/07/2023
2429 Nicollet Avenue
651-252-4452
55404
Minneapolis, MN
Amy Junge
The County School Superintendent has a goal to improve teacher retention. After researching 
solutions, he has determined that implementing Teacher-Powered practices will increase 
teacher retention. To support this work, the Superintendet’s office applied for and was awarded 
a grant from the Arizona Department of Education (ADE) to collaborate with Education Evolving 
to establish Teacher-Powered practices in Maricopa County schools.
04/07/2023
$175,000
715-D370-ESSER-Grant







SEARCH 
A search was conducted consisting of: (check all that apply) 
Market research 
Public notice given, list 
Other vendors contacted 
Other 
RESULTS 
no alternatives were identified 
no alternatives were deemed acceptable 
because (explain below): 
Describe the search from above in detail: 
PRICE 
MC1-352-B states: The Using Agency requesting a Competition Impracticable Procurement shall provide written evidence 
to support a Competition Impracticable determination containing an explanation of why the proposed procurement 
process is advantageous to the County; and the scope, duration, and estimated total dollar value of the procurement. 
Price has been fairly and reasonably established by: 
Comparison to previous comparable purchases 
from a different vendor 
Independent estimate 
Comparison to public sector contract pricing 
Discount off published catalog pricing 
Market survey 
Other, explain: 
Describe methodology and results (attach any written supporting data, e.g., survey or market analysis): 
THIS IS A COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT BECAUSE (attach additional page if needed): 
Education Evolving is the sole organization in the United States that designs, launches, and 
sustains Teacher-Powered Schools by facilitating networks, hosting conferences, events, and 
site visits, developing resources and guides, and providing professional development and direct 
technical assistance to teachers and leaders. Education Evolving supports schools throughout 
the country, but none in Maricopa County. The grant proposal was written to advance the 
Superintendent’s teacher retention goal by implementing their work in Maricopa County.
Education Evolving is the only organization in the country that supports schools and 
organizations with implementing Teacher-Powered practices in schools. Education Evolving 
partners with Empower Schools to create sustainable models. Education Evolving is a 
sub-contractor of Education Evolving. 
Analyzing the education consulting market, we found that $200 an hour, per consultant, is a 
standard average rate. Given the time frame of this project and the number of contracted 
experts assigned to the project (which also includes travel to Phoenix two times a year, material 
development, and on-demand support), we determined that the average number of weekly 
hours served is 20. The project is 52 weeks and applying the standard $200 an hour equals 
$208,000.00. The actual total price for services is $175,000.





X
Kevin Tyne, Director, OPS
May 19, 2023