AZTEC COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE.PDF

Office of Procurement Services
GOODS AND SERVICES
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FORM
This form is to be used when an agency believes an acquisition is a single source and the acquisition dollar amount is above
$5,000. The Chief Procurement Officer can approve purchases up to $100,000. Board of Supervisors approval is required if
the acquisition is over $100,000. This form must be submitted for approval to: Office of Procurement Services I 320 W.
Lincoln I Phoenix„ AZ 85003, Fax number: 602,258.1573. The signed form must be retained in the purchasing file.
DEPARTMENT NAME DEPARTMENT RX#
Transportation
PROPOSED CONTRACT VENDOR NEED IDENTIFIED Date: Nov 8 2018
Company: Aztec Engineering REQUESTED DELIVERY
Address: Add ess: 4561 E. McDowell Rd Date: Nov 17, 2018
City, State: Phoenix, AZ QUOTED mu: 386,019
Zip/Postal Code: 85008
Phone: (602) 454-0402 Accounting String.
Fax: (602) 454-0403
Contact Name: Mark Gilliland
DESCRIPTION OF GOODS OR SERVICE REQUIRED:
The estimated cost of this Procurement is: r , $ 100k (0':> $100k
Is this a Technology Procurement? Yes fro , No
SINGLE SOURCE CATEGORY (Check applicable box, attach documentation or provide explanation below.)
Maricopa County Procurement Code MC1-351 states: "Single source" means an acquisition where, competition is impractical because
of standardization, warranty, or other factors as approved by the Board of Supervisors.
NOTE: The following are unlikely to be sufficient single source justifications:
• Personal or agency preference for a product or vendor
• Agency perception that the vendor is the best qualified (this should be determined through a competitive process)
• Lack of agency planning resulting in limited time to conduct a competitive procurement
• Special incentive or deal offered (can be assessed in open and competitive solicitation)
• Agency convenience
Software license renewals, additions, or upgrades available
()Grant specified (supporting documents attached) C) from only one source
, Brand compatibility available from only one source (no other
C) Mailing lists, subscriptions or media advertising t ' ' distributors)
()Warranty voided if service provided by other contract vendor ()Other proprietary situation
(i) Other (Provide written explanation below)

THIS PROCURNIENT IS A SINGLE SOURCE BECAUSE (attach additional page if needed):
Provide additional design services and coordination as a result of delayed progress due to right-of-way
acquisition and extended environmental work. The original scope intended for Aztec Engineering to
provide roundabouts design at two intersections within the project and re-use the existing 2013 design
for the rest of the project, As the project advanced, two new developments have constructed within the
project area, the survey monumentation has been found to need update, and the utilities in the area
have reconfigured, prompting a need to revise the full project design. Aztec Engineering has the project
history and detailed design knowledge of the project for the plans, specifications, utilities issues, and
engineer's estimate. The continuation of their services adds efficiency and consistency to the project,
The project schedule would be impacted severely should a different consultant be contracted.
SEARCH
A search was conducted consisting of: (check all that apply) RESULTS
0 Market research D Public notice given, list El no alternatives were identified
III Other vendors contacted n Other ci, no alternatives were deemed acceptable
because (explain below):
Describe the search from above in detail:
The alternative is to use another design consultant and this is not acceptable because of the
unfamiliarity other consultants have to this project, as well as additional delay to the project schedule.
Aztec Engineering has the history and detailed knowledge of the project issues to complete this
design.
PRICE
MC1-352-B states: The Using Agency requesting a Competition Impracticable Procurement shall provide written evidence
to support a Competition Impracticable determination containing an explanation of why the proposed procurement
process is Advantageous to the County; and the scope, durafon, and estimated total dollar value of the procurement.
Price has been fairly and reasonably established by: III Comparison to public sector contract pricing
Comparison to previous comparable purchases 1111 Discount off published catalog pricing
a from a different vendor n Market survey
III Independent estimate • Other, explain:
Describe methodology and results (attach any written supporting data, e.g., survey or market analysis):
The fee for this work is consistent with other approved contract rates for this type of work,

CERTIFICATIONS
I certify:
1) I recognize that the Marlcopa County Procurement Code requires the use of competitive solicitations unless
exempted by law. I have reviewed the information and materials relevant to this procurement of goods and services,
and am requesting approval of an exception to the competitive process for the reasons described;
2) the price to be paid to the proposed single source vendor is fair, reasonable, and provides the best value to Maricopa
County; and
3) this request for an exception to the competitive solicitation process is not the result of inadequate advance planning
or for purposes of securing the services of a preferred vendor.
Agency Head or Agency Head Delegate Signature (Required)
.e.. Vt. Y1 ‘ e.-/ tt\ tS--\ 2OiS
Printed Name ig re Date
Office of Procurement Services
The CPO can approve procurements up to $100,000. This request is over $100,000 and must be submitted as an agenda
item to the Board of Supervisors for consideration.
N Recommended to BOS for approval. (
i t
Ke\I \i-) <-11--)C 11 /11
Printed Name Si attire Date
Email Save

Scope of Services Project
Specific
Scoping and Final Design
Deer Valley Road: El Mirage Road to 109 th Avenue
Work Assignment No. 3
Consultant: AZTEC
Project No: TT0248
Contract No.: 2015-032
Maricopa County
Department of Transportation
2901 W. Durango Street
Phoenix, AZ 85009
November 2018

Scope of Services
Project Specific
Table of Contents
SCOPE OF SERVICES — PROJECT SPECIFIC 3
ProjectOverview.......„.„,.., ......... .................................... . ... ............... ... , ..... . . ......
Project Location 3
Project Background 3
Project Purpose 3
Length of Services ......................................... .................. ......... ..... ..... - .... ., 3
100.3.3 Matrix of Responsibilities 3
100.3.4 Matrix of Deliverables 6
100.3.5 Communication Plan 7
100.4 Design Criteria ........ . .. . ......... ..... . ..... ...... ....... ..... ...... .........
400.1 Stakeholder Meetings ............. ....... ................ .............. 8
1200.1 Project Submittals 9
List of Tables
Table 1 — Matrix of Responsibilities 3
Table 2— Matrix of Deliverables 7
Table 3 — Contact Table 7
Table 4 — Design Criteria 8
Table 5 — Project Submittals Table 9
Project No.: TI0248 Contract No.: 2015-032
Revised: November 2018 Page 2 of 9

Scope of Services
Project Specific
SCOPE OF SERVICES - PROJECT SPECIFIC
Project Overview
Project Local/on
The Deer Valley Road: El Mirage Road to 109 Th Avenue (DVR) project is located in the northwest
Valley and is approximately 2.5 Miles in length. Specifically, the project lies within Sections 18 and 19,
TownShip 4 North, -Range I East and Sections 13 and 14, Township 4 North, Range I West of the Gila
and Salt River Baseline & Meridian, .Maricopa County, Arizona.
Project Background
The DVR al 'ea is mainly comprised of undeveloped open desert stirrotinding the Agua Fria River (Al
are residential developments in the western portion of the area. The existing Williams Drive
roadway provides local access from El Mirage Road to 117th Avenue. Several active sand and gravel
mining operations are located in the AFR.
Project Purpose
The DVR project will provide an additional crossing of the AFR between Bell Road and Happy -Valley
Parkway. Bell Read is currently the only bridged east-west crossing of the river between Olive- Avenue
and Happy Valley Parkway, a Span Of 10 miles. This Scope ofServices and Cost Proposal for
-additional design services are being .submitted as A Change Order to Work Assignment No. 3.
Length of Services
The length of additional design services is estimated to be six months from Notice to Proceed (NTP).
Post design services are estimated to be another 15 months Once construction is awarded.
100.3.3 Matrix of Responsibilities
Table 1 —Matrix of Responsibilities
Scope kent Consu ant McD0T Other (Identify)
Section
100 Project Management X
200 Data Acquisition X
300 Land Survey X
400 Project Coordination X
500 Utilities and Railroad X X
600 Environmental X
700 Alternatives Analysis N/A
800 Technical Memoranda and X (Revised
Reports Drainage Report)
900 Plans, Specifications and Estimate
1000 Right-of-Way X X
1100 Value Engineering N/A
1200 Submittals X
1300 Bidding Phase X X
1400 Post Design X
Project No,: TT0248 Contract No.: 2015-032
Revised: November 2018 Page 3 of 9

Scope of Services
Project Specific
AZTEC originally completed the final design of this project for MCDOT in 2013. Sealed plans,
specifications, estimate and. bid schedule were submitted at that time. Stibsequently, MC.DOT approved
the use of roundabouts at the 117''' Avenue and 109 1" Avenue intersections with DVR. In addition,
mining activities have continued in the AFR changing the existing ground 'conditions. AZTEC was then
tasked to provide Final Design Update with Roundabouts 'through a previous Work.Assigntnent. This
previous scope of work included revising the original conStruction documents to incorporate the
roundabouts and change in existing ground -conditions by adding new sheets and revising original sheets
to meet current MCDOT standards. The 'current congfruction standard details were to be referenced in
the plan. set. The .original plans were not to be changed if possible. The pre-30% and 30% submittals
were made in accordance with this previous scope of work. The 60% submittal was enhanced to include
the new and revised Sheets, and the original sheets at the request of MCDOT to provide a complete plan
set for reference of the review team. Extensive comments were received on the combined plan set and
several comment resolution meetings have been held, including a separate constructability review. The
-95% and Sealed PS&E submittals. are pending ongoing Utility Coordination primarily concerning APS's
.design of their joint trench. MCDOT has also requested an additional submittal of95% plans to the
utilities labeled as the 60% resubmittal. MCDOT has also requested. that a- separate - allowance be
included for a potential 100% submittal. A. separate cost - estimate has been developed for this
allowance. Additional efforts ate required to complete- -the design based on the comments and. requests
received to date andas fellows.
100 Project Management
Additional meetings,. coordination and. administration are needed for the extended. design effort. A.
Design Kick-Off Meeting is not required. No Design Criteria. or Design Exceptions will be developed.
A maximum of six AZTEC staff members will attend six - Project Progress Meetings including preparing
the. meeting notes. Field Walk with PrOject Main 18 not required, Project Administration will be
performed including monthly invoices and progress reports for the extended duration of the design.
200 Data Acquisition.
AZTEC will research, collect and review all additional available project data -. A. Site Visit for Project
Research is not required,
300 Land Survey
•MCDOT will perform the Land Survey (aerial mapping) effort including providing topographic files of
all visible utilities, property _lines, and right-of-way for the entire -projed.
400 Project Coordination
.A maximum of three AZTEC staff members will attend three Stakeholder Meetings including preparing
the meeting notes. No additional Technical Advisory Committee or Stakeholder Advisory Committee.
meetings are anticipated.
The public- will be informed of the project by appropriate communication channels by MCD0'17. No
additional AZTEC support is required.
10A.'s with the City of Peoria will be -porfermed by MCDOT-. AZTEC has and will continue to support .
MCDOT in their efforts to dew -JO the MA's - by evaluating construction impacts, construction costs and
_maintenance responsibilities.
500 Utilities and Railroad
MCDOT will lead theUtilities and Railroad effort. Utility maps/as-builts and railroadinformation will
be provided by the MCD -OT Utility Coordinator. Any necessary potholing will be coordinated through
•MCDOT and the data 'provided to AZTEC. Review of prior rights,. identification of power source,
coordination With peWer companies and utility clearance will be Conducted. by •MCDOT.
Project No.: '170248 Contract No.: 2015-032
Revised: November 2018 Page 4 of 9

Scope of Services
Project Specific
No additional Utility Coordination Meetings are included. AZTEC will assist MCDOT's Utilities and
Railroad effort including coordinating and incorporating the additional pothole information, and
reviewing and incorporating the APS joint trench design.
600 Environmental
MCDOT will perform the Environmental efforts including the environmental clearance and pothole
clearance.
800 Technical Memoranda and. Reports
AZTEC has and will continue to coordinate with FCDMC o resolve their review comments .inoluding
revised MeMicken Dam Outlet Wash modeling and design, -and update the Drainage Report.
900 Plans, Specifications and Estimate
The -60% ,submittal was enhanced to include the new and revised sheets, and the original sheets at the
request of 1VICDOT to provide a complete plan set for reference of the review team. The 60% submittal
included 314 .sheets and 146 cross - section sheets, for a total of 460 sheets. The previous Scope Of work
included 84 sheets and 70 cross section sheets,. for a total of 154 sheets. The 60% submittal included
306 sheets in addition to the previous scope of work.
New survey was provided by MCDOT to update the design for the change of AFR conditions due to the
mining. It Was determined that the construction. centerline was not coincident with the calculated mid-
section line. The original design files have been realigned and Mated. to Match the new siirvey and
maintain the center portion of the design. The original alignment has been revised to the west and east
as needed to meet design criteria and to tie into existing conditions. This impacts all of the - 202 plan
sheets in. the 60% submittal, This also .requires revisions to the preliminary roundabout designs to
-accommodate the revised .DVR alignment. The entire plan set will be updated due to this change and to
incorporate the additional sheets in a logical Order. All 314 sheets in the 60% submittal will be
reordered and renumbered for the 95% submittal.
Additional revisions for the 95% submittal include:
• Two New Developments north of William S Drive between 120 th Lane and l23" Avenue (2
landscape sheets)
O New AFTRR Crash CitshiOn Requirements (1 roadway sheets)
• New MASH Compliant Barrier End Treat -bents (5 roadway sheets)
• Revised city Pavement Sections (2 roadway sheets)
• New City Waterline at 109 th Avenue (4 roadway sheets)
• New City Entry Treatment near 109 th Avenue (2 landscape sheets)
• Additional Potholing (2 roadway sheets)
o Incorporate APS Joint Trench and Hanger Design (14 roadway sheets)
Revised AFTRR Barriers, Railings and Bridge Marker (4 bridge sheets)
o AFTRR Underdeck Lighting Accommodation (2 bridge sheets)
• APR Bridge and AFTRR Roadway Lighting Accommodation (2 bridge sheets)
• Revised Signing Standards (4 sign sheets)
The following sheets are needed in addition to the previous scope of work:
• Roundabout Quantity Summary (4 summary sheets for additional quantities)
• Bike Ramp Details (4 sheets for additional details)
O Roundabout Roadway Plan and Profile (6 plan and profile sheets for additional coverage)
• Roundabout Drainage Plan (2 drainage sheets for additional coverage).
Project No..: TT0248 . Contract No.: 2015-032
Revised: November 2018 Page 5 of 9

Scope of Services
Project Specific
6 Boring Log (4 -sheets for the bridge Soil conditions)
o Roundabout and River Bottom Landscape Plan (7 sheets for Additional coverage)
• Separated Roundabout - Signing and Marking (8 sheets to separate signing and 'marking .
information due to amount of information)
• Lighting 84 Pedestrian Beacons (6 sheets to add lighting and pedestrian beacons)
The entire plan set which is estimated at 355 .sheets Will be labeled as the ,60% resubmittal for the
utilities Cross sections, specifications, estimate and drainage report will not be included with this
resubinittal.
The entire plan set which is . estimated at 355 sheets will be revised and labeled as the 100% submittal as
a separate alloWalide. is included for a potential 100% submittal. A 'separate cost estimate has been
developed for this allowance. Cross sections, specifications, -estimate and drainage report will he
included with this submittal.
The entire- plan set will be resealed for the Final PS&E submittal which is estimated at 355 sheets and
146 cross section sheets ; for a total of 501 . sheets, The previous scope of work included 110 . sheets and
70 cross Section sheets; for a total of 180 sheets. The .PS&E submittal will include 321 sheets- in
addition to the previous scope of work.
The following general efforts arc also needed in addition to the previous scope ofwork:
Additional Earthwork Investigation and Recommendations
MeMicken Materials and Stockpile Evaluation
o Reformatting Specifications
o Additional herr) Specifications
Additional Bid Items and Number Coordination
AZTEC will use MCDOT's Cost Estimation Tool to prepare the engineering estimates.
1000 Right-of-Way
MCDOT will lead the Right-of-Way effort. Property information will be gathered and analyzed, title
research, acquisition and clearance as needed by MCDOT Real Estate.
MCDOT will develop the right-of-way strip maps, estimates, legal descriptions plans and appraisals as
needed.
No additional AZTEC support is required.
1200 Submittals
No add itiOnal AZTEC support IS required.
1300 Bidding Phase
No additional AZTEC support is required.
1400 Post Design
No additional .AZTEC support is required.
Alternative Analysis and Value Engineering are not included in this Scope of Services.
100.3.4 Matrix of Deliverables
MictoStation will be used to develop CADD deliverables and will use MCDOT's CADD Standards.
Project No,: TT0248 Contract No,: 2015-032
Revised: November 2018 Page 6 of 9

Scope of Services
Project Specific
Table 2 — of Deliverables
Item Deliverable 60% ps% um% Sealed
ResObmittal Allowance PS&E
Project Plans 0 DF
Project Cost Estimate Document DF F S
Project Specifications Document DF
D = Draft, F =Final & S = Sealed
100.3.5 Communication Plan
Table 3 — Contact Table
Phone
Name Role Agency Mailing Address Email Address
Number
Ben Project 2901 W. Durango Street benmarkert@mail.
MCDOT 602-506-8651
IViarkert Manager Phoenix, AZ 85009 rnaricopa.gov
Bassem 2901 W. Durango Street bassemnaba@mail.
Drainage MCDOT 602-5064713
Naba Phoenix, AZ 85009 maricopa.gov
Jessy Utility 2901 W. Durango Street jessyemert@mail.rn
MCDOT 602-506-4681
Emert Coordinator Phoenix, AZ 85009 aricopa.gov
Greg 2901 W. Durango Street greghunter@marico
Survey MCDOT 602-506-4679
Hunter Phoenix, AZ 85009 pa.gov
Environmental 2901W. Durango Street joepinto@rnaricopa
Joe Pinto MCDOT 602-506-8068
Manager Phoenix, AZ 85009 .gov
Right-of-Way 2901 W. Durango Street patmertz@ma rico p
Pat Mertz MCDOT 602-506-4639
Manager Phoenix, AZ 85009 a.gov
Bryan Communicatio 2901W. Durango Street bryanpahia@marico
MCDOT 602-506-0543
Pahla ns Phoenix, AZ 85009 pa.gov
2901 W. Durango Street johnshi@maricopa,
John Shi Materials MCDOT 602-506-8658
Phoenix, AZ 85009 gov
Brian 2901W. Durango Street brianneves@marico
Traffic IVICDOT 602-506-4626
Neves Phoenix, AZ 85009 pa.gov
David 9875 North 85' Avenue, charles.andrews@p
Roadway MCDOT 6 02-506-2826
Fritz Peoria, AZ 85345 eoriaaz.gov
Charles 2901 W. Durango Street davidfritz@maricop
Peoria 623-773-7358
Andrews Phoenix, AZ 85009 a.gov
Mark Project 4561 East McDowell Rd
AZTEC 602-659-9351 rngilliland@aztec.us
Gilliland Manager Phoenix, AZ 85008
Felipe Project 4561 East McDowell Rd
AZTEC 602-458-9273 fmedrano@aztec.us
Medrano Engineer Phoenix, AZ 85008
Project No.: TT0248 Contract No.: 2015-032
Revised: November 2018 Page 7 of 9

Scope of Services
Project Specific
Tony 4561 East McDowell Rd tbokich@aztec.us
Bokich Drainage AZTEC 602-458-7487 Phoenix, AZ 85008
Andrew 4561 East McDowell Rd
Moreno Traffic AZTEC 602-659-9309 Phoenix, AZ 85008 amoreno@aztec.us
Mario 4561 East McDowell Rd mcolecchia@aztec.
Colecchia Bridge AZTEC 602-458-7494 Phoenix, AZ 85008 Us
Dan 4561 East McDowell Rd dwoelzlein@aztec.0
Woelzlei Landscape AZTEC 602-659-9317 Phoenix, AZ 85008 s
n
Justin ,
4561 East McDowell Rd jhoppmann@aztec.
Hoppman Environmental AZTEC 602-458-9261 Phoenix, AZ 85008 US
n
100.4 Design Criteria
Table 4 —Design Criteri
Criterion Reference Section
Current IVICDOT Roadway,
Traffic, and Drainage As Applicable
Design Manuals
Current MAG Specifications
and Details with MCDOT As Applicable
Supplements
400.1 Stakeholder Meetings
Progress Meetings shall be held once a month for the duration of the project. An estimated nine
meetings are anticipated based on the project schedule. The meetings shall be held in MCDOT's office,
located at 2901 West Durango Street. All meetings will last approximately two hours. AZTEC will have
a maximum of six representatiVes in attendance at each Meeting and prepare draft and final meeting
notes.
Project No.: TT0248 Contract No.: 2015-032
Revised: November 201.8 Page 8 of 9

Scope of Services
Project Specific
1200.1 Project Submittals
Table 5—Protect Submittals Table
Legend: Copies
H# - Number of Hard Copies Requested Name TBD) Name
TBD)
E - Indicates Electronic Submittal is Requested Manager) Hard
Markert Last Company Last r
of
keholde
Name, Representative Name,
Ben (Project (Utility Number
(Sta
First First l
Submittal Document Tota
60% Plans (Resubmittal) E E 1
95% Plans, Specs and Estimate (Project) E E E 5
100% Plans, Specs and Estimate (Project) E E E 5
Sealed Plans, Specs and Estimate (Project) E E E 5
R,:\Phoenix1 ProjOcts\AZEI574 TACDOT_On-Call EntpesTrojAcImin‘Work Assignment 3 Contract Modification120181108mkg-
15-eerValleyRoatiScopeRevO.doex
Project No.: TT0248 Contract No.: 2015-032
Revised: November 2018 Page 9 of 9

Deer Valley Road: El Mirage Road to 109th Avenue AZTEC
PROJECT NO. TT0248 Contract No. 2015-032
DERIVATION OF COST PROPOSAL SUMMARY
(Figures Rounded To The Nearest $1)
ESTIMATED DIRECT LABOR
PERSON BILLING
CLASSIFICATION HOURS RATE/HOUR TOTAL
Project Principal 86.59
Project Manager 72 62,49 4,499
Senior Engineer 246 65.02 15,995
Project Engineer 482 52.13 25,127
Engineer/Designer 840 38.52 32,357
CADD/Technician 1,304 30.59 39,889
Project Administration 19.43
2,944 Hours
Estimated Labor Cost 117,867
Overhead 172.7% 203,533
Subtotal 321,400
ESTIMATED DIRECT EXPENSES
(Listed By Item At Estimated Actual Cost - NO MARKUP)
Travel 73
Plotting -
Miscellaneous Expenses $ 671.70
Total Estimated Expenses 745
ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES AND CONSULTANTS
Firm Cost
Total Estimated Outside Services
PROFIT (Direct Labor +Overhead) 10% 32,139.97
TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE $ 354,284
CONTRACT TIME 730 Calendar Days
11/18/2018
Date
June 2017 Page 1 of 4

84.0 18.0 10.0 4.0 2.0 24.0 18.0 42.0 . 72.0 150.0 400.0 160.0 180.0 1200.0 180.0 160.0 120.0 120.0 514
AZTEC 2015-032 Total 2
Popo
No.
Contract
Project Administra ft......
CADD1Tech nician 80 240 60 96 640 96 60 32
Engineer/D esigner 36 8 4 24 16 40 100 50 48 320 48 5D 54 32
I
Project Engineer 24 2 2 12 6 12 32 20 40 30 24 160 24 30 32 32
1 i
Senior Engineer 12 6 6 16 10 20 20 12 80 12 20 16 16
I
Project Manager 12 18 6 6 6 8 5 B
I _
Project Principal
0.5 0.5 4 29 0.5 0.5
Hours/ Sheet
,
No Shts 306 202 314 44 41 355 321
PHASE i
Scale
-
HOURS
STAFF
Design))
and submittal) submittal)
Avenue ESTIMATED
Modeling 60% 60%
the the
109th Wash in In
Support) Outlet sheets) sheets sheets sheets)
to TASK and plan 314 sheets) sheets)
Dam the additional Submittal) Drawings)
Road (Evaluation additional 202 of revised sheets) 355
(McMicken 306 the of each 44 new the 321 PS&E Advertisement Shop
Mirage Needs (ISA) Trench) the each per the of 41 of of each the of Requirements and Out
Reports Optimization of per hour each each per each (Pre-30% Prepare (RFIs Close
El 1T0248 Team Collection Information Research Agreements Joint Reports and Estimate each hours (1/2 per per hour per Easement to Conference and
Meetings Project Data (APS and and per (2 Renumber hours hours (112 hour Process Documents Submittal Addenda Information
Road: Administration Research/Data Protect Meetings Memoranda Roundabout hour Rotate (4 (1/2 and Lands Submittal Submittal Submittal Assistance Conference of Administration
NO. Management Meeting Progress with Acquired Additional and Coordination Involvement Railroad Coordination Memoranda Specifications (1/2 and and Sheets (30 Resubmittal Plans Sooping PS&E Opening Pm-Construction for
Valley Walk Acquisition Visit Stakeholder Intergovernmental and Plans Plans Plans Sheets Specifications Estimates Right-of-Way State PS&E PS&E PS&E Phase Technical Pre-Bid Preparation Design Requests
Kick-Off Project Field Project Project Review identify Site Public Utility Technical Technical Pre-30% 30% 60% 95% Realign Reorder Revise New 80% Sealed Right-of-Way AZ Submittals Draft 30% 60% 95% Sealed Bidding Bid Project 2DIT
Deer PROJECT Project 100.2 100.6 100.9 100.10 Data 200.1 200.2 200.3 200.4 Project 400.1 400.4 400.5 Utilities 500.3 800.1 Plans. 900.3 900.4 900.5 900.6 900.8 900.9 900.10 1000.4 1000.14 1200.3 1200.4 1200.5 12016 1200.8 1300.1 1300.2 1300.3 1300.4 Post 1400.1 1400.2 1400.5 June
VIM 100 200 400 500 800 900 1000 1200 1300 1400

AZTEC 2015-032 Total MEMO 4 of 3
Pogo
No.
Contract
Project AcIminIstra
CADE/Tech n'cian 1304
g'neer/D esigner 840
E
Project Engineer
'or Se Engineer MIEMINIIIIEMME01111
Project Manager
Project Principal
2
Hours/ Sheet
No Shls EMI
PHASE
Scale
-
HOURS
STAFF
Avenue ESTIMATED
109th
to
Road
Mirage
El 'TT0248
Road:
NO
Valley
PROJECT 2017 Juno
Deer

Deer Valley Road: El Mirage Road to 109th Avenue AZTEC
PROJECT NO. TT0248 Contract No. 2015432
ESTIMATE OF DIRECT EXPENSES
Travel
A. Local Mileage at
0.64 351 miles
Subtotal Travel
Plotting
B. Exhibits at exhibits
C. Plots at plots
D. Plan Submittals
Hatt Size Bond Copies at Copies
Full Size Bond Copies at Copies
Subtotal Plotting
Miscellaneous Expenses
C. Other 8.5 x 11 0 @ $0.03/copy (3000 copies)
11.0 x 170 @ $0.06lcopy (7500 copies)
Full Size Mylars 0 @ $9.25
Full Size Vellums 0 @ $3.30
Messenger 6 g $21.95
Subtotal Miscellaneous Expenses
ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES & CONSULTANTS
TOTAL ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES
TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENSES 745
June 2017 Page 4 of 4

Deer Valley Road: El Mirage Road to 109th Avenue AZTEC
PROJECT NO, TT0248 Contract No. 2015-032
100% Submittal Allowance
DERIVATION OF COST PROPOSAL SUMMARY
(Figures Rounded To The Nearest $1)
ESTIMATED DIRECT LABOR
PERSON BILLING
CLASSIFICATION HOURS RATE/HOUR TOTAL
Project Principal 86.59
Project Manager 6 62.49 375
Senior Engineer 20 65.02 1,300
Project Engineer 48 52.13 2,502
Engineer/Designer 80 38.52 3,082
CADD/Technician 104 30,59 3,181
Project Administration 4 19 A3 78
262 Hours
Estimated Labor Cost 10,518
Overhead 172.7% 18,162
Subtotal 28,680
ESTIMATED DIRECT EXPENSES
(Listed By Item At Estimated Actual Cost - NO MARKUP)
Travel
Plotting
Miscellaneous Expenses 186.95
To Estimated Expenses 187
ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES AND CONSULTANTS
Firm Cost
-
Total Estimated Outside Services
PROFIT (Direct Labor +Overhead) 10% 2,868:05
TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE 31735
CONTRACT TIME 730 Calendar Days
11/18/2018
Date
:71a.msasforms...nom
June 2017 Page 1 of

180.0 30.0 30.0 _ 22.0 oft
AZTEC 2015-032 Total 2
Popo
No.
Contract
Project Administra tiro" 4
CADD/Tech Malan 96 8
EngineeriD esigner 48 16 0 8
Project Engineer 24 8 8 8
I
Senior Engineer 12 4 4
Project Manager 2 2 2
-
Project Principal
- ,
0.5
Hours/ Sheet
-
No Shts 355
PHASE _ _
Scale
-
HOURS
STAFF
Design))
ESTIMATED and submittal) submittal)
Avenue Modeling 60% 60%
Wash the in the in
109th Suppor)) Outlet sheets) sheets sheets sheets)
to TASK and Darn plan 314 sheets) sheets) 321 Submittal)
Road (Evaluation additional 202 the revised sheets) 355 additional
(McMicken 306 the of of each 44 new the PS&E Advertisement
Mirage Needs (IGA) Trench) the each per the of 41 of of each the of Requirements (Pre-30%
Allowance Collection Joint Reports Reports Optimization of each per hour each each per each Prepare
El T10248 Team information Research Agreements (APS and Estimate per hours (1 per per hour per Easement Process to
Road: Meetings Project Data Project Meetings and and hour (2 Renumber hours hours (1/2 hour and Documents Submittal Submittal Submittal Submittal Submittal Assistance Addenda
NO. Meeting Progress with Administration Research/Data Acquired Additional Involvement Railroad Coordination Memoranda Memoranda Roundabout (1/2 Rotate (4 (30 (1/2 Lands PS&E Conference of
Submittal Management Walk and Coordination Intergovernmental Specifications Plans Plans Plans and and Sheets Sheets Resubmittal Plans Plans Specifications Right-of-Way State Sopping PSSE POSE ME PS&E Phase Preparation Opening
Valley Kick-Off Project Field Project Acquisition Project Review Identify Visit Site Stakeholder Public and Utility Technical Pre-30% 30% 60% 95% Realign Reorder Revise New 60% 100% Sealed Estimates Right-of-Way AZ Submittals Draft 30% 60% 95% 100% Sealed Technical Pre-Bid Bid
Deer PROJECT 100% Project 100.2 100.6 100.9 100.10 Data 200.1 200.2 200.3 200.4 Project 400,1 400.4 400.5 Utilities 500,3 Technical 800.1 Plans, 900.3 900.4 900.5 900.6 900.7 900.8 900.9 900.10 10004 1000.14 1200,3 1200,4 1200.6 1200,6 1200,7 1200.8 Bidding 1300,1 1300.2 1300,3 1300.4 2017 Juno
100 200 400 500 800 900 1000 1200 1300

AZTEC 2015-032 Total 262.0 of 3
Pogo
No.
Contract
Project Administra V
CADD/Tech clan
Engineer/D esigner 80
Project Engineer
Senior Engineer
1
Project Manager
Project Principal
Hours/ Sheet
No Shts 355
-PHASE
Scale
HOURS
STAFF
Avenue ESTIMATED
109th
to TASK
Road Drawings)
Shop Out
Mirage and
Allowance (RFis Close
El TT0248 Conference and
Road: information Administration
NO. Submittal Pre-COnstrUCtiOn for
Valley Design Requests Project
Deer PROJECT 100% Post 1400.1 1400.2 1400.5 2017 June
••• 1400

Deer Valley Road: El Mirage Road to 109th Avenue AZTEC
PROJECT NO. TT0248 Contract No. 2015-032
100% Submittal Allowance
ESTIMATE OF DIRECT EXPENSES
Travel
A. Local Mileage at
0.54 miles
Subtotal Travel
Plotting
B. Exhibits at $ exhibits
C. Plots at plots
D. Plan Submittals
Half Size Bond Copies at Copies
Full Size Bond Copies at Copies
Subtotal Plotting
Miscellaneous Expenses
C. Other 8.5 x 11 0 @ $O,63/copy (500 copies)
11.0 x 170 @ $0.06/copy (2500 copies) 50
Full Size Mars 0 @ $9.25
Full Size Vellums 0
Messenger 1 @ $21.95
Subtotal Miscellaneous Expenses '187
ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES & CONSULTANTS
TOTAL ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES
TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENSES 187
June 2017 Page 4 of 4