MCP2023005 - BOS HANDOUT_.PDF

Maricopa County — Formal (2024-08-21)

View PDF Item 5 Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 5927 characters
DATE:  
August 21, 2024 
 
TO: 
 Board of Supervisors    
 
From: 
 Martin Martell, Planner   
 
SUBJECT: 
 MCP2023005 – The Parking & Trailer Storage  
 
 Agenda Item #5 
 
 
 
 
 
Since the publishing of the BOS report and at the August 8, 2024 public hearing, the Commission 
adopted a motion recommending approval  of MCP2023005 by a vote of 6-0 subject to conditions 
‘a’ – ‘j’:   
 
a. 
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan 
entitled “The Parking Trailer & RV Storage“, consisting of five full-size sheets, dated 
April 21, 2024, and stamped received April 23, 2024, except as modified by the 
following conditions. 
 
b. 
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative 
Report entitled “The ParKing-Semi Trailer & RV Storage”, consisting of four pages, 
dated April 21, 2024, and stamped received April 23, 2024, except as modified by 
the following conditions. 
 
c. 
The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply:  
 
1.  
The grading & drainage plan shall illustrate that there shall be one foot of 
freeboard for any retention basins that are more than one foot in depth.  
 
2. 
With any building permit submittal the applicant must provide a preliminary 
hydraulic analysis for the spillway into the retention basins in the drainage 
report.  
 
3.  
The grading & drainage plan’s cover sheet shall list 143rd Avenue’s 
roadway classification and design speed.   
 
4.  
Any disturbance to a floodplain shall require a floodplain use permit 
concurrent with any building permit.  
 
5.  
With the submittal of a building permit the applicant shall provide a Traffic 
Impact Statement (TIS) per the MCDOT Traffic Impact Procedures that are

signed and sealed by a civil engineer who is currently registered in Arizona. 
Any dedication and offsite improvements that are deemed required by 
MCDOT traffic and permits based on the submittal of a TIA or TIS.  
However, this does not include the identification of utilities or underground 
facilities within or adjacent to the required right-of-way that may have prior 
rights and/or require relocation.  
 
6.  
For sites that are located within the County’s Urbanized Area, a Storm 
Water Pollution Prevention Permit (SWPP) from the County shall be 
required prior to the issuance of any construction permits. This does not 
preclude the requirement to obtain a Notice of Intent to Discharge (NOID) 
from the State (ADEQ), as may be required.  
 
7.  
Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual 
design only.  All development and engineering design shall be in 
conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; 
Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa 
County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, 
standards, and best practices at the time of application for construction.  
 
8.  
Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, 
changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering 
design of the site’s drainage infrastructure.  
 
9.  
Detailed Grading and Drainage (Site Infrastructure) Plans must be 
submitted with the application for building permits.  
 
10.  
The entire site and adjacent half-streets’ runoff shall be retained onsite. If 
portions of adjacent right-of-way are controlled by other jurisdictions, the 
adjacent half-streets’ runoff shall be retained unless separately addressed 
by the other jurisdictions.  
 
11.  
Sufficient retention volume shall be provided onsite to retain the required 
100-year, two-hour runoff from all contributing areas. Retention basins with 
stormwater depths exceeding one foot shall provide one foot of freeboard. 
All retention basins shall drain within 36 hours per County requirements.  
 
d. 
Buildings are subject to noise attenuation as per ARS § 28-8482(B).  
 
e. 
The sight-visibility triangle located on the southeast corner of the site’s driveway 
and 143rd Ave. may be eliminated.  
 
f. 
The use of fences and gates without attached screening materials shall be allowed 
for the outdoor storage facility’s west fence and gate.

g. 
Unless paved, the outdoor storage facility’s driveways and storage areas shall be 
surfaced with a minimum of four-inch sealed recycled asphalt with a quarter inch 
of gravel used as dust control for the non-residential parts of the lot that meet 
AZDAQ standards.  
 
h. 
Any use on the site must abide by the non-assignable clearance easement that 
affects this site and the lighting height guidance by the FAA, for more information 
contact: 
56fw.cit.communityinitiative@us.af.mil.   
 
i. 
The existing residence that takes up 1.8 acres of the west part of the lot (excluding 
the facility’s driveway) shall remain residential in nature and shall not be part of 
the outdoor storage facility.  
 
j. 
The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the 
applicant, with the consent of the landowner.  The granting of this approval allows 
the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on 
the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply 
with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date 
of application.  It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to 
the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed 
on the date of application to use, divide, sell, or possess the property and that there 
would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date 
of application due to such revocation of the MCP.  The MCP enhances the value 
of the property above its value as of the date the MCP is granted and reverting to 
the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the MCP had never 
been granted.