Z2023112 BOS REPORT_PART1.PDF

Maricopa County — Formal (2024-04-10)

View PDF Item 10 Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 14827 characters
April 10, 2023 
Z2023112 
Page 1 of 4 
 
 
 
 
Report to the Board of Supervisors 
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department 
 
Board Hearing Date: 
April 10, 2024 
 
Case #/Title:   
 
 
Z2023112 – Englund Equipment  
 
Supervisor District: 
5 
 
Applicant/Owner:  
Shaine Alleman, Tiffany & Bosco, P.A / 11328 Buckeye Rd, LLC 
 
Request: 
Zone change from Rural-43 & C-3 to IND-2 IUPD 
 
Site Location: 
Generally located at the NEC of Avondale Blvd. & Buckeye Rd. in the 
Cashion/Avondale area 
 
Site Size: 
Approximately 12.15 acres 
 
County Island Status: 
Yes (City of Avondale) 
Additional 
Comments: 
There are no outstanding concerns from County reviewing 
agencies. The requested zone change with overlay from Rural-43 & 
C-3 to IND-2 IUPD will permit continued use and expansion of 
Englund Equipment’s trucking operations, including semi-truck 
parking and storage. The site is currently in violation of the county’s 
zoning ordinance, as a truck terminal is not a permitted use in either 
C-3 or Rural-43 zoning. The proposed IND-2 IUPD zoning will 
remedy the violation, and will further accommodate future 
industrial and mixed uses that are appropriate along the railroad 
and highway. The parcel is in a corridor along the railroad that is an 
unincorporated county island surrounded by City of Avondale. The 
City’s general plan designated this corridor for Mixed Use that 
encourages vertically integrated developments comprised of 
residential, retail, dining, office, and entertainment / recreational 
uses to promote alternative modes of transportation. Although the 
site does have access to alternative modes of transportation with 
proximity to the Union Pacific Railroad, this existing transportation 
facility is oriented to freight traffic rather than pedestrian passenger 
service. In most regards, MC 85, and the railroad beside it, serve as 
an industrial arterial accommodating similarly zoned industrial 
uses in the south and southwest valley.  
 
On March 4th, after publishing of the report to the commission, the 
City of Avondale provided a letter of opposition to the request 
asking the planning and zoning commission to direct the property 
owner to annex into the City prior to zone change and development,

April 10, 2023 
Z2023112 
Page 2 of 4 
or if the case is approved, the City requests development comply 
with their requirements for water utility services, street 
improvements and ingress/egress to City public right-of-way, 
emergency access and adherence to City fire prevention measures 
and a neighborhood meeting that notifies property owners within a 
1,000-foot radius of the subject parcel consistent with City public 
notification requirements. City comments were provided to the 
Commission at their March 7th hearing.  Commissioner Montoya 
expressed familiarity with the site and described its configuration 
as difficult to develop for anything other than for what it is currently 
being used. Commissioner Schlosser echoed Commissioner 
Montoya’s sentiment in regard to the use of the site having been 
established prior to the proximate residential development to the 
north.  
 
As recommended by staff, conditions ‘d’ will address the City’s 
concern for street improvements by having the applicant 
coordinate with the City to review traffic impact, dedication, 
permitting or roadway improvement requirements. Condition ‘e’ 
addresses the City’s fire safety concerns by requiring written 
confirmation from the emergency fire protection agency having 
jurisdiction over the site and authority to provide emergency fire 
protection service prior to certificate of occupancy. Condition ‘f’ 
addresses the City’s water service concern by requiring either a pre-
annexation agreement or a ‘will serve’ letter from the certificated 
water and sewer provider.  
 
One letter of support was received by Mr. Terry Walker after 
publishing of the report to the Commission. He noted compatibility 
with the industrial development patterns along the railroad. 
Property to the east has applied for a similar IND-3 IUPD rezoning. 
Mr. Walker’s letter was included in the Commission handout. 
  
One letter of opposition was received from Mr. Doug McClure, a 
homeowner within 126’ of the site, and was detailed in the report to 
the Commission. On March 8th, Mr. McClure submitted objection to 
the Commission’s recommendation. On March 9th and 10th, Mr. 
McClure sent two more objections as a rebuttal to the 
Commissioner’s reasoning for their recommendation. These letters 
are attached. There is no other known opposition to the proposed 
IND-2 IUPD zoning. 
 
Commission  
 
Recommendation: 
On 3/7/24, the Commission voted 8-0 to adopt a motion 
recommending the Board of Supervisors approve Z2023112 
subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘k’:  
 
a. 
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the zoning exhibit 
entitled “Site Plan for Truck Terminal Parking“, consisting of two full-size sheets, dated 
January 23, 2024, and stamped received January 24, 2024, except as modified by the 
following conditions. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial 
conformance with the approved site plan.  Minor and major amendments to the site plan

April 10, 2023 
Z2023112 
Page 3 of 4 
will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning 
Ordinance. 
 
b. 
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the narrative report 
entitled “Englund Equipment Company”, consisting of 17 pages, dated August 29, 2023, 
and stamped received January 24, 2024, except as modified by the following conditions. 
 
c. 
The following IND-2 IUPD standards shall apply: 
 
1. Minimum Side Yard Setback: 0 ft. 
2. Chain link fence with screening material not less than six feet in height adjacent to or 
abutting any rural or residential zoning boundary to the north property boundary. 
3. Chain link fence without screening material not less than six feet in height for east, 
south, and west property boundaries. 
 
d. 
The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply:  
 
1. 
Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design 
only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with 
Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and 
Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design 
Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the 
time of application for construction.  
 
2. 
Detailed Grading and Drainage Plans must be submitted with the application for 
Building Permits. 
 
3. 
Avondale Boulevard is within the jurisdiction of the City of Avondale. The 
applicant will be responsible for coordinating with the City to review any traffic 
impact, right-of-way dedication, permitting or roadway improvement 
requirements.  
 
4. 
For sites located within the County’s Urbanized Area, a Storm Water Pollution 
Prevention Permit (SWPPP) from the County will be required prior to issuance of 
any construction permits. This does NOT preclude the requirement to obtain a 
Notice of Intent to Discharge (NOID) from the State (ADEQ), as may be required.  
 
5. 
Retention basins with stormwater depths exceeding one foot shall provide one 
foot of freeboard.  
 
6. 
All retention basins shall drain within 36 hours per County requirements.  
 
e. 
Approval of a plan of development will be required prior to approval and issuance of 
construction permits to develop and establish use of the site. Prior to issuance of a 
building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection 
jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their 
regulations and requirements and that emergency fire protection service will be provided 
to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection 
jurisdiction review and approval will be required.  
 
f. 
Prior to precise plan of development approval, the applicant shall provide the Maricopa 
County Planning and Development Department with an executed pre-annexation service

April 10, 2023 
Z2023112 
Page 4 of 4 
agreement with the City of Avondale that identifies the detail for when the proposed 
project will be annexed and/or the provision of water and sewer service.  In lieu of a pre-
annexation service agreement, the developer must provide a ‘will serve’ letter from the 
certificated water and sewer provider, unless otherwise approved by Maricopa County 
Environmental Services Department. 
 
g. 
All outdoor lighting shall be in conformance with the provisions listed in Section 1112 of 
the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. Any outdoor lighting shall be placed so as to 
reflect light away from any adjoining rural or residential zoning district.  
 
h. 
Any amendments to the zone change shall be processed as a revised application in 
accordance with Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance requirements.  
 
i. 
Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation may be grounds for initiating a 
revocation of this zone change per the requirements and processes set forth in the 
Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.  
 
j. 
The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the 
County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions.  
 
k. 
The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the 
applicant, with the consent of the landowner.  The granting of this approval allows the 
property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of 
application, subject to conditions.  In the event of the failure to comply with any 
condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application.  
It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply 
With any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to 
use, divide, sell, or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value 
of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of 
the zone change. The zone change enhances the value of the property above its value as 
of the date the zone change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the 
same value of the property as if the zone change had never been granted. 
 
Presented by: 
 
Daniel Johnson, Planner 
Reviewed by: 
 
Darren Gérard, AICP, Planning Manager   
 
Attachments: 
 
McClure objections (7 pages) 
 
 
3/7/24 P&Z handout (6 pages) 
 
 
3/7/24 P&Z packet (45 pages)  
 
 
 
 
 
Note: 
3/7/24 Draft P&Z Minutes are not available as of the writing of this report, but can be provided 
upon request later when available.

1
Daniel Johnson (PND)
From:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Sent:
Friday, March 8, 2024 1:18 PM
To:
Daniel Johnson (PND)
Subject:
FW: Appeal case Z2023112
 
 
From: Doug McClure <doug.mcclure1@outlook.com>  
Sent: Friday, March 8, 2024 12:57 PM 
To: PND PZAppeal <PNDPZAppeal@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Appeal case Z2023112 
 
I would like to appeal the decision made by the Planning and Zoning Commission. This was not a truck stop when I moved here in 2005. It can clearly be seen in the satellite photo from 2005 that there were no trucks parked there. It was not  
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
 
This Message Is From an External Sender  
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.  
 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd 
I would like to appeal the decision made by the Planning and Zoning Commission. This was not a 
truck stop when I moved here in 2005. It can clearly be seen in the satellite photo from 2005 that 
there were no trucks parked there. It was not zoned for industrial use before, and they insist that they 
can change it now that a residential development was built.  They create a lot of air and noise 
pollution and an offensive view. If the zoning is changed, they should not be given a waiver for 
screening.  
 
Douglas McClure 
11155 W Tonto St  
Avondale AZ 85323

1
Daniel Johnson (PND)
From:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Sent:
Monday, March 11, 2024 6:26 AM
To:
Daniel Johnson (PND)
Cc:
Darren Gerard (PND)
Subject:
FW: Z2023112
 
 
From: Doug McClure <doug.mcclure1@outlook.com>  
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2024 9:17 AM 
To: PND PZAppeal <PNDPZAppeal@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Z2023112 
 
The area was zoned commercial because it had been commercial all these years. It was not until 2020 that Englund Equipment company started renting out trucking spaces. They also seem to have closed down their terminal in Texas and moved it  
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
 
This Message Is From an External Sender  
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.  
 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd 
The area was zoned commercial because it had been commercial all these years. It was not until 
2020 that Englund Equipment company started renting out trucking spaces. They also seem to have 
closed down their terminal in Texas and moved it here. That is when it became industrial. The houses 
were there 15 years before that. Englund should know they needed a permit to do this. They do not 
care about the law. They do not care about their neighbors. That is why this property should not be 
rezoned. They should also be required to build a wall like anyone else if the zoning is changed. That 
is what the regulations say. They should have to follow regulations like anyone else. 
 
Doug McClure 
11155 W Tonto St.  
Aavondale AZ 85323

1
Daniel Johnson (PND)
From:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Sent:
Monday, March 11, 2024 6:26 AM
To:
Daniel Johnson (PND)
Cc:
Darren Gerard (PND)
Subject:
FW: Z2023112
Attachments:
-1381885419_20231026_132514_5235762.jpg; -436394720_20231026_132557_4857310.jpg; 
1492647033_20231026_132506_3784234.jpg; 2057301190_20231026_132458_3956657.jpg
 
 
From: Doug McClure <doug.mcclure1@outlook.com>  
Sent: Saturday, March 9, 2024 2:37 PM 
To: PND PZAppeal <PNDPZAppeal@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Z2023112 
 
Englund has no regard for their neighbors and should not get zoning change. If I expand my house I know I have to get a permit. They did not get a permit. Sent from my Galaxy                                                                  
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
 
This Message Is From an External Sender  
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.  
 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd 
 
Englund has no regard for their neighbors and should not  get zoning change. If I expand my house I know I have to get a 
permit. They did not get a permit.   
 
 
Sent from my Galaxy