11. Z2022171 PZ Report
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
139150 characters
Z2022171
Page 1 of 11
Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
Case:
Z2022171 – Gamblers Row
Hearing Date:
November 2, 2023 (Continuance from October 5, 2023)
Supervisor District:
4
Applicant:
John Mireles, Hitt-Zollars INC
Owner:
Jordan Ben/JTL LLC
Request:
Special Use Permit (SUP) for an equestrian event facility with an RV Park
in the Rural–43 zoning district.
Site Location:
Generally located 500’ west of the SWC of Pete Road and Eagle Eye Road
in the Aguila area.
Site Size:
Approximately 74.62 acres
Density:
N/A
County Island:
No
County Plan:
Rural Development Area (0-1 d.u./ac)
Municipal Plan:
N/A
Municipal Comments:
None received to date
Support/Opposition:
448 Support / 176 Opposition
Recommendation:
Denial
Z2022171
Page 2 of 11
Project Summary:
1.
The applicant is requesting a special use permit (SUP) for an equestrian event facility with an RV
Park in the Rural-43 zoning district. The Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance (MCZO) under
Articles 1301.1.11 (Special Uses) describes the following: “Land use involving large assemblage
of people” and Article 1301.1.17 “Travel Trailer of recreation vehicle (RV) parks,”. The subject site
is comprised of 74.62 acres and is located approximately 500 feet west of the SWC of Pete Road
and Eagle Eye Road in the Aguila area.
2.
The subject site abuts scattered residential and vacant lots to the east, north, west, and south.
The vacant property to the west recently received a recommendation of approval by the Planning
and Zoning Commission for the 140.55 acre Ben Jordan Acre Preliminary Plat consisting of 45
residential lots and 7 tracts directly west of the subject site (S2022008). Approximately 560 acres
surrounding the subject site to the north, west, and south are owned by the same owner of this
application.
3.
The development of the equestrian event facility would be known as Gambler’s Row. The facility
would consist of two 34,000 square foot outdoor arenas, one 34,000 indoor arena, cattle holding
pens, cattle sorting pens, public parking, areas for retail and concession vendors, and public
restrooms. The applicant states the equine events would occur seasonally between the months
of October and March during the daylight hours. The outdoor arenas are proposed to have lighting
that will be in compliance to Section 1112 of the MCZO and speakers that will be pointed in a
southerly direction towards vacant land.
4.
The indoor arena would include four separate 4,900 square foot pens, a 1,600 square foot hay
shed, and 1,600 square foot shop. The two outdoor arenas would each include four, 4,800 square
foot pends, two, 1,600 square foot holding pens, six sorting and shipping pens, one announcer
booth, and concession stands that will be prefabricated shipping containers.
5.
In addition, the applicant is also proposing two RV parks within Gambler’s ROW, West RV Park
and East RV Park, that will consist of a 140 total spaces, with three comfort stations. The RV
parks will be operated as part of the equestrian facility for event participants. The proposed
comfort stations will include restrooms, showers, and laundry facilities that will only be exclusive
for the RV park resident. Horse stalls are proposed to be located east of the RV parks for residents
to rent for their horses.
6.
The applicant is proposing a total of 298 parking spaces for participants and spectators on the
eastern portion of the subject site with 13 ADA parking spaces near the indoor arena. In addition
to the RV, additional parking spaces will be provided within each individual RV stall for resident’s
individual vehicle. Access to the site is proposed along Gambler’s Way on the south portion of the
site for participants and spectators. Another access point is proposed on the west side of the site
for RV’s, hay and cattle trucks.
Z2022171
Page 3 of 11
2023 Aerial Image of the Site
Zoning of the Site and Adjacent Properties
Z2022171
Page 4 of 11
2023 Surrounding Community Aerial
Z2022171
Page 5 of 11
Site Plan Excerpt
Existing On-Site and Adjacent Zoning / Land Use:
7.
On-site:
Rural-43 / Vacant
North:
Rural-43 / Vacant
South:
Rural-43 / Vacant
East:
Rural-43 / Vacant
West:
Rural-43 / Vacant
Utilities and Services:
8.
Water:
Aguila Water Services, INC.
Wastewater:
Onsite septic system
School District:
Aguila Elementary School District
Fire:
Aguila Volunteer Fire Department
Police:
Maricopa County
Refuse Collection: CR&R Environmental Services
Right-of-Way:
9.
The following table includes existing and proposed half-width right-of-way and the future
classification based on the Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) Major
Streets and Routes Plan.
Z2022171
Page 6 of 11
Street Name
Half-width
Existing R/W
Half-width Proposed R/W
Future Classification
Eagle Eye Road
30 feet
65’
Principal Arterial
Gambler’s Way
0’
40’
Local
519th Avenue
0’
40’
Local
Adopted Plan:
10.
Maricopa County Vision 2030 (adopted 2013): Designates the subject property as Rural
Development Area (0-1 d.u./ac).
Public Participation Summary:
11.
The applicant met the minimum ordinance requirements for outreach with the posting of the
property and notification to all property owners of record within 300 feet of the subject site. In
addition, the applicant held a neighborhood meeting February 2, 2023, inviting 114 property
owners that live in the subdivision north of the site and within the split lots.
12.
The applicant states in their citizen participation report that a notice inviting property owners was
mailed January 26, 2023. The neighborhood meeting was held at the Aguila Fire Station with 40
attendees and was approximately one-a-half hour in length. During the meeting the applicant
answered questions and addressed concerns raised by the attendees. The main issues that were
brought up during the meeting were drainage, manure disposal, lighting, sound from speakers,
policing, horse riding, and dust. The applicant states in their citizen participation report that they
acknowledge and discussed solutions to each concern as follows:
a. Drainage: Citizens raised the concern regarding drainage ponding north of the subject site,
the applicant assured them that they would be in compliance to the County’s polices
regarding the amount of flow that would be coming from the subject site.
b. Manure Disposal: Citizens raised concerns regarding the disposal of manure. The
applicant assured them that the manure from arenas, holding pens, sorting pens, and
horse stall would be removed daily and placed in dumpsters that will be hauled to the farm
and dumped on a weekly basis.
c. Light/Sound: Citizens raised concerns regarding lights facing their home and the noise
that will be caused during the events. The applicant assured them that lights will be in
compliance to MCZO and would only be on during the events and amplified
announcements would be very minimal with the speakers facing downwards so the noise
does not travel.
d. Policing: Citizen raised concerns regarding having police present during the events. The
applicant assured them that security would be provided during event days.
e. Horse Riding: Citizens raised concerns with off-site horse riding within the air park to the
north and suggested the applicant propose signs along Pete Road restricting horse riding
in that area. The applicant agreed to put up signs.
f. Dust: Citizens raised concerns with dust being a health concern to the surrounding
citizens. The applicants informed them that dust would be mitigated by water trucks
watering the site to contain any dust from being picked up into the air.
Z2022171
Page 7 of 11
13.
The property owner initially requested a continuance from a September 14th Planning and Zoning
Commission hearing to a November 2nd hearing in order to conduct additional public outreach
since staff received 11 letters of opposition and a petition of opposition with 73 signatures. The
letters of opposition stated concerns regarding the use not being appropriate for a residential
area due to dust, noise and traffic the use will attract to the subject site.
14.
The applicant held an additional neighborhood meeting on September 25, 2023 inviting the
community of Aguila, including residents of nearby towns and close neighbors. Per the applicants’
citizen participation results, the meeting was approximately 1½ hours with approximately 76
attendees. The applicant prepared a brochure that provided citizens with the project background
and answers to the concerns that have been brought up by neighbors. The applicant also reached
out to citizens that are highly opposed to the project, and the applicant states they were able to
answer all their questions and that many of the citizens that opposed the project had no issues.
Staff has not received recalls to any of the received opposition. The applicant has made no
additional changes to their project due to the additional public outreach results.
15.
Since the September 14th continuance, staff has received an additional 92 letters of opposition,
staff notes most of the letters are duplicates, with 78 surrounding property owners being in
opposition. Additionally, the applicant provided staff a total of 437 letters of support and staff
has received an additional 11 letters of support, most of them being duplicates as well, with 177
property owners being the total in support.
Z2022171
Page 8 of 11
3,500 sq ft Opposition and Support Map
Outstanding Concerns from Reviewing Agencies:
16.
N/A
Staff Analysis:
17.
Staff notes the proposed equestrian event facility with an RV park is a high-intensity, large-scale
use which is appropriate for this location and the proposed conditions could make the site work
with the surrounding residential/rural neighborhood.
18.
There is no condition regarding noise, but the applicant states in their proposal that amplified
noise will be kept to a minimum with the speakers facing downward. Staff did recommend an 8-
foot CMU wall around the site to serve as a buffer, but the applicant rejected the recommendation
due to them providing approximately a quarter mile buffer of vacant land surrounding the site.
Staff acknowledges the site is abutting a right-of-way (Eagle Eye Road) on the eastern boundary,
and on the west boundary the site is abutting a future subdivision that was recently approved in
the Preliminary Plat phase (case no. S2022008). The applicant currently owns the subdivision to
Z2022171
Page 9 of 11
the west, and they have indicated they anticipate the future property owners within the subdivision
will use the subject site.
19.
Staff had initially proposed a condition to only allow three (3) events per month, but the applicant
rejected the recommendation due to the possibility of a negative economic impact to the project.
Staff worked with the applicant and condition this SUP to only allow a maximum of 80 events per
year. Each event would be subject to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., with lights being
required to be off by 11:00 p.m. for safety.
20.
Staff notes that support letters were provided within the 300’ buffer, but the applicant of this SUP
owns approximately 461.24 acres near and surrounding the site that is including within the 300’
buffer. Staff recognizes the applicants’ additional efforts to reach out to surrounding property
owners, but no additional measures have been proposed to meet the concerns provided by the
neighbors to overturn any opposition. Due to the significant opposition received from properties
near the subject site, staff cannot support the SUP and recommends denial due to the concerns
brought up by the neighbors.
21.
Staff notes the concerns for dust. The Air Pollution Control Regulations Rule 310.01 was adopted
January 27, 2010 and is regulated and enforced by MCAQ. Rule 310.01 covers “non-traditional
dust generating activities, including livestock activities. The purpose of Rule 310.01 states:
To minimize the amount of fugitive dust entrained into the ambient air from non-traditional
sources of fugitive dust by requiring measures to prevent, reduce, or mitigate fugitive dust
emissions.
216. Livestock Activities: Any activity directly related to feeding animals, displaying animals,
racing animals, exercising animals, and/or for any other such activity including, but not
limited to, livestock arenas, horse arenas, feed lots, and residential activities related to
feeding or raising animals.
22.
Staff notes the concerns for noise disturbance. The Noise Ordinance (P-23) was adopted
February 15, 2006 and is regulated and enforced by MCSO. The purpose of P-23 states:
At and above certain levels, noise is detrimental to the health and welfare of Maricopa County
citizens. Therefore, Maricopa County has determined that it is in the best interest of its citizens
to control noise in a manner which promotes commerce; the use, value, and enjoyment of
property; sleep and repose; and environmental quality. Therefore, it is hereby declared to be
the policy of Maricopa County to prohibit excessive, unnecessary, disruptive, and annoying
noises from all sources. The noise ordinance applies to properties within unincorporated
Maricopa County.
V. Public Disturbances
A. It shall be unlawful for any person to cause, or for any person in possession of property
to allow to originate from the property, any noise which disturbs the peace or quiet of any
neighborhood if such noise can be heard from within closed residential structures
located within 500 feet of the boundary of the property from which such noise emanates.
This subsection shall not apply to noise produced in the normal conduct of business
provided that such noise occurs within the normal and customary hours for the conduct
of such business, which is based on the normal and customary hours of operation of
Z2022171
Page 10 of 11
similar, existing businesses, and the operation is legally conducted within the scope of
all ordinances, laws, and statutes of Maricopa County and the State of Arizona.
Recommendation:
23.
For the reasons outline in this report, staff recommends denial of Z2022171 due to the level of
community opposition.
24.
However, if the Commission chooses to adopt a motion to recommend approval of Z2022171,
staff offers the following conditions ‘a’ – ‘k’
a.
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the site plan entitled
“Gambler’s Row“, consisting of nine full-size sheet, dated March 7, 2023, and stamped
received April 13, 2023, except as modified by the following conditions. Staff may
determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site
plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with
Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
b.
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the narrative report
entitled “Narrative Report for Gambler’s Row”, consisting of sixteen pages, dated March 6,
2023, and stamped received March 22, 2023, except as modified by the following
conditions.
c.
A 6 foot solid CMU wall shall be provided along the east property line to serve as screening
from the development.
d.
The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply:
1.
Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only.
All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section
1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards;
Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual;
and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of
application for construction.
2.
Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to
the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the site’s
drainage infrastructure.
3.
Detailed Grading and Drainage (Site Infrastructure) Plans must be submitted with
the application for Building Permits.
e.
This special use permit is valid for a period of ten (10) years and shall expire on December
6, 2033, or upon the termination of the use for a period of 90 or more days, whichever
occurs first. All site improvements associated with the special use permit shall be
removed within 90 days of such expiration or termination of use.
f.
The number of events shall not exceed a 80 per year.
Z2022171
Page 11 of 11
g.
Operation hours for events shall only be from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
h.
All outdoor lighting shall be in conformance with the provisions of Section 1112 of the
Zoning Ordinance and shall be placed so as to reflect light away from any adjoining rural
or residential zoning district. Parking lot lighting and related facility lighting shall be shut
off by 11:00 p.m.
i.
Noncompliance with any Maricopa County regulation or ordinance shall be grounds for
initiating revocation of this SUP as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
j.
The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the
County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions.
k.
The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant,
with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to
enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application,
subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, and at the
time of expiration of the Special Use Permit, the property shall revert to the zoning that
existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either
revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, or the expiration of the Special
Use Permit, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use,
divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the
property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation or
expiration of the Special Use Permit. The Special Use Permit enhances the value of the
property above its value as of the date the Special Use Permit is granted and reverting to
the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Special Use Permit had
never been granted.
Presented by:
Paola Jaramillo, Planner
Reviewed by:
Matthew Holm, AICP, Planning Supervisor
Attachments:
Case Map (1 page)
Site Plan (reduced 8.5”x11”, 1 page)
Narrative Report (16 pages)
Engineering comments (7 pages)
MCESD comments (2 page)
MCDOT Comments (6 pages)
Opposition / Support Map (2 pages)
Support Letters (449 Pages)
Opposition Letters (129 Pages)
Opposition Petition (6 pages)
/
Maricopa County Planning & Development - Phoenix, AZ
4
Gross Acres: 75 approx.
Generated September 5, 2023 1:32 PM
Z2022171
Application Name:
Legal Description
Gamblers Row
Applicant
Case Address
,
John Mireles for Huitt-Zollars Inc.
47302 N EAGLE EYE Rd
Applicant Phone/Email
Parcel Primary:
602.814.4404
johmireles@huitt-zollars.com
AGUILA AZ 85320
Map scale 1:6,539
Supervisor District No.
506-06-061A, 506-06-061B
SUP - GAMBLERS ROW PSEIS
1005
2243.83
1006
2234.57
1011
2253.51
2232.4
2233.5
2234.5
2235.5
2236.7
2237.6
2238.5
2239.5
2240.6
2241.5
2242.6
2243.6
2244.5
2245.7
2246.5
2247.6
2248.5
2249.7
2250.5
2251.4
2252.6
2253.5
2254.4
2255.5
3.5
2245.5
2247.6
2250.7
2252.7
2255.6
2257.6
0.5
2262.4
2259.5
2256.4
2253.5
2251.6
2251.6
2246.7
2244.8
2242.6
2240.8
2239.6
2241.5
2244.5
2245.3
2249.6
2251.4
2252.4
2256.4
2257.2
2262.4
2258.5
2255.5
2252.8
2250.8
2248.5
2246.3
2243.3
2240.9
2238.8
2238.4
2240.5
2243.5
2245.6
2247.6
2251.7
2253.6
2256.6
2259.7
2260.6
2258.5
2255.6
2253.6
2250.6
2246.5
2245.6
2243.7
2239.4
2237.4
2239.6
2242.5
2245.4
2248.2
2249.5
2252.3
2255.5
2258.6
2260.6
2260 5
2257.5
2255.4
2252.4
2249.6
2246.8
2245.4
2242.6
2239.8
2237.7
2239.6
2241.5
2244.7
2246.5
2249.6
2251.4
2254.5
2257.3
2259.5
2257.6
2254.6
2252.5
2249.5
2246.6
2244.6
2241.6
2238.8
2236.7
2235.6
2238.4
2241.5
2243.7
2246.4
2248.4
2251.6
2253.5
2257.5
2259.6
2258.7
2256.7
2253.5
2250.5
2247.6
2244.8
2242.6
2240.6
2237.6
2235.7
2236.4
2239.5
2241.5
2243.7
2246.4
2250.5
2251.5
2255.6
2254.5
2252.2
2249.7
2245.7
2242.5
2240.7
2237.6
2235.6
2233.7
2232.6
2234.6
2237.3
2239.5
2241.5
2245.6
2248.7
2252.6
2255.4
2255.5
2254.6
2252.4
2250.7
2247.5
2245.7
2240.9
2237.8
2235.6
2233.6
2231.9
2254.6
2249.5
2248.5
2239.5
2240.3
2240.5
2241.3
2240.5
2253.6
2253.7
2253.2
2256.5
2256.6
2257.5
2250.5
2234.8
2254.3
2252.4
2249.7
2246.4
2243.1
2239.6
2237.1
2233.6
2231.
2261.3
2259.8
2259.3
2260.2
2257.8
2260 8
2258.5
2258.4
2255.6
2256.6
2250.2
2246.6
2246.6
2250.8
2252.5
2255.7
2253.1
2256.5
2254.3
2250.4
2248.3
2247.8
2248.4
2247.7
2243.2
2240.3
2247.3
2243.6
2241.2
2242.5
2240.3
2238.4
2240.7
2248.3
2255
2255
2255
2255
2255
2255
2255
2255
2255
2255
2260
2260
2260
2260
2260
2
2250
2250
2250
2250
2250
2250
2250
2250
2250
2250
2245
2245
2245
2245
2245
2245
2245
2245
2245
2245
2245
2245
2240
2240
2240
2240
2240
2240
2240
2240
2240
2240
2240
2240
2235
2235
2235
BEN JORDAN
RU-43
506-06-061A
BEN JORDAN
RU-43
506-06-059B
SHEET 3
SHEET 4
SHEET 9
SHEET 8
SHEET 9
SHEET 7
SHEET 7
SHEET 4
SHEET 5
SHEET 3
SHEET 8
SHEET 5
GAMBLER'S WAY
519TH AVE
EAGLE EYE ROAD
SHEET 6
FENCE 1
FENCE 2
FENCE 3
FENCE 4
BEN JORDAN CENTER
RU-43
506-06-060
SHEET
PROJECT NO.
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
PLOT DATE:
OF
Land Planning Hydrology Land Development Civil Infrastructure Surveying
5050 N 40th Street, Suite 100 | Phoenix, AZ 85018
Office(602) 252-8384
www.huitt-zollars.com
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
SITE PLAN
GAMBLER'S ROW
R314395.03
9
JM
STAFF
JM
3/2/2023
3/7/23
SITE PLAN
FOR
GAMBLER'S ROW
CASE # 22022171
LOCATED IN A PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 34, T7N, R9W, MARICOPA
COUNTY, AZ
APN 506-06-061B & 506-06-061A
VICINITY MAP
Dial 8-1-1 or 1-800-STAKE-IT (782-5348)
In Maricopa County: (602) 263-1100
Call at least two full working days
before you begin excavation.
Arizona Blue Stake, Inc.
®
PROPERTY OWNER
ENGINEER
SHEET INDEX
UTILITIES & SERVICE
1
KEY MAP
BEN JORDAN
RU-43
506-06-059A
DATE: MARCH 6, 2023
SITE DATA
NOTES:
DEVELOPMENT TABLE
LEGEND
RV PARKING LAYOUT (TYP)
PARKING (TYP)
HORSE STALLS (TYP)
SECTION "A"
SECTION "B"
SECTION "C"
SECTION "D"
SECTION "E"
COLLECTOR CHANNEL
SECTION "F"
COLLECTOR CHANNEL
SECTION "G"
COLLECTOR CHANNEL
SECTION "H"
COLLECTOR CHANNEL
GAMBLER'S WAY
RURAL MINOR COLLECTOR
EAGLE EYE ROAD
RURAL MINOR ARTERIAL
519TH AVE
RURAL MINOR COLLECTOR
SHEET
PROJECT NO.
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
PLOT DATE:
OF
Land Planning Hydrology Land Development Civil Infrastructure Surveying
5050 N 40th Street, Suite 100 | Phoenix, AZ 85018
Office(602) 252-8384
www.huitt-zollars.com
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
SITE PLAN
GAMBLER'S ROW
R314395.03
9
JM
STAFF
JM
3/2/2023
3/7/23
Dial 8-1-1 or 1-800-STAKE-IT (782-5348)
In Maricopa County: (602) 263-1100
Call at least two full working days
before you begin excavation.
Arizona Blue Stake, Inc.
®
2
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
2245.7
2246.5
2247.6
2248.5
2249.7
2250.5
2251.4
2252.6
2253.5
2254.4
2251.6
2253.5
2257.5
2256.7
2253.5
2250.5
2250.5
2251.5
2255.6
2254.5
2252.2
2249.7
2248.7
2252.6
2255.4
2253.6
2253.7
2253.2
2256.5
2256.6
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
2255.6
2250.2
2246.6
2246.6
2250.8
2252.5
2255.7
53.1
2255
2255
2255
2255
2250
2250
2250
BEN JORDAN
RU-43
506-06-059A
GAMBLER'S WAY
EAGLE EYE ROAD
Q100 = 114-CFS
GAMBLER'S WAY
EAGLE EYE ROAD
SHEET
PROJECT NO.
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
PLOT DATE:
OF
Land Planning Hydrology Land Development Civil Infrastructure Surveying
5050 N 40th Street, Suite 100 | Phoenix, AZ 85018
Office(602) 252-8384
www.huitt-zollars.com
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
SITE PLAN
GAMBLER'S ROW
R314395.03
9
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
Dial 8-1-1 or 1-800-STAKE-IT (782-5348)
In Maricopa County: (602) 263-1100
Call at least two full working days
before you begin excavation.
Arizona Blue Stake, Inc.
®
JM
STAFF
JM
3/2/2023
3/7/23
MATCH SHEET 5
MATCH SHEET 4
3
1006
2234.57
2234.5
2235.5
2236.7
2237.6
2238.5
2239.5
2240.6
2241.5
2242.6
2243.6
2244.5
2245.7
2238.4
2241.5
2243.7
2246.4
2248.4
2247.6
2244.8
2242.6
2240.6
2239.5
2241.5
2243.7
2246.4
2245.7
2242.5
2240.7
2237.6
2235.6
2237.3
2239.5
2241.5
2245.6
2240.5
2234.8
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
2243.1
2239.6
2237.1
2247.7
2245
2245
2245
2245
2245
2245
2240
2240
2240
2240
2240
2235
BEN JORDAN
RU-43
506-06-061A
STATE OF ARIZONA
RU-43
506-06-062
EAGLE EYE ROAD
EAGLE EYE ROAD
SHEET
PROJECT NO.
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
PLOT DATE:
OF
Land Planning Hydrology Land Development Civil Infrastructure Surveying
5050 N 40th Street, Suite 100 | Phoenix, AZ 85018
Office(602) 252-8384
www.huitt-zollars.com
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
SITE PLAN
GAMBLER'S ROW
R314395.03
9
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
Dial 8-1-1 or 1-800-STAKE-IT (782-5348)
In Maricopa County: (602) 263-1100
Call at least two full working days
before you begin excavation.
Arizona Blue Stake, Inc.
®
JM
STAFF
JM
3/2/2023
3/7/23
4
MATCH SHEET 3
MATCH SHEET 6
MATCH SHEET 7
BASIN "D"
HW = 2239.0
BOT = 2238.0
Vp = 3.9
Vr = 3.7
2259.7
2258.5
2255.6
2253.6
2250.6
2252.3
2255.5
2258.6
2257.5
2255.4
2252.4
2251.4
2254.5
2257.3
2257.6
2254.6
2252.5
2253.1
2256.5
2254.3
2250.4
2255
2255
2255
2250
BEN JORDAN
RU-43
506-06-059A
GAMBLER'S WAY
Q100 = 112-CFS
Q100 = 150-CFS
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
138
139
140
137
1136
GAMBLER'S WAY
SHEET
PROJECT NO.
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
PLOT DATE:
OF
Land Planning Hydrology Land Development Civil Infrastructure Surveying
5050 N 40th Street, Suite 100 | Phoenix, AZ 85018
Office(602) 252-8384
www.huitt-zollars.com
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
SITE PLAN
GAMBLER'S ROW
R314395.03
9
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
Dial 8-1-1 or 1-800-STAKE-IT (782-5348)
In Maricopa County: (602) 263-1100
Call at least two full working days
before you begin excavation.
Arizona Blue Stake, Inc.
®
JM
STAFF
JM
3/2/2023
3/7/23
MATCH SHEET 8
5
MATCH SHEET 3
MATCH SHEET 6
2250.6
2246.5
2248.2
2249.5
2249.6
2246.8
2245.4
2246.5
2249.6
2249.5
2246.6
2250.5
2250.4
2248.3
2247.8
2248.4
2248.3
2250
2250
2250
2250
2
96
104
112
120
125
133
SHEET
PROJECT NO.
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
PLOT DATE:
OF
Land Planning Hydrology Land Development Civil Infrastructure Surveying
5050 N 40th Street, Suite 100 | Phoenix, AZ 85018
Office(602) 252-8384
www.huitt-zollars.com
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
SITE PLAN
GAMBLER'S ROW
R314395.03
9
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
Dial 8-1-1 or 1-800-STAKE-IT (782-5348)
In Maricopa County: (602) 263-1100
Call at least two full working days
before you begin excavation.
Arizona Blue Stake, Inc.
®
JM
STAFF
JM
3/2/2023
3/7/23
MATCH SHEET 9
MATCH SHEET 4
MATCH SHEET 5
6
MATCH SHEET 7
2245.6
2245.6
2243.7
2239.4
2239.6
2242.5
2245.4
2245.4
2242.6
2239.8
2239.6
2241.5
2244.7
2244.6
2241.6
2238.8
2239.5
2240.3
2240.5
2241.3
2241.2
2242.5
2240.3
2238.4
2240.7
2245
2245
2245
2240
2240
2240
BEN JORDAN
RU-43
506-06-061A
SHEET
PROJECT NO.
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
PLOT DATE:
OF
Land Planning Hydrology Land Development Civil Infrastructure Surveying
5050 N 40th Street, Suite 100 | Phoenix, AZ 85018
Office(602) 252-8384
www.huitt-zollars.com
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
SITE PLAN
GAMBLER'S ROW
R314395.03
9
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
Dial 8-1-1 or 1-800-STAKE-IT (782-5348)
In Maricopa County: (602) 263-1100
Call at least two full working days
before you begin excavation.
Arizona Blue Stake, Inc.
®
JM
STAFF
JM
3/2/2023
3/7/23
MATCH SHEET 9
MATCH SHEET 4
MATCH SHEET 6
7
BASIN "C"
HW =22141.0
BOT = 2240.0
Vp = 2.3
Vr = 2.1
BASIN "B"
HW = 2239.0
BOT = 2238.0
Vp = 2.1
Vr = 1.9
2259.5
2256.4
2253.5
2251.6
2249.6
2251.4
2252.4
2256.4
2257.2
2258.5
2255.5
2252.8
2250.8
2251.7
2253.6
2256.6
2254.6
2250.5
2259.3
2257.8
2255
2250
2250
BEN JORDAN
RU-43
506-06-059B
BEN JORDAN ACRES
RU-43
506-06-060
GAMBLER'S WAY
519TH AVE
6-CFS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
1
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
41
52
53
95
GAMBLER'S WAY
519TH AVE
SHEET
PROJECT NO.
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
PLOT DATE:
OF
Land Planning Hydrology Land Development Civil Infrastructure Surveying
5050 N 40th Street, Suite 100 | Phoenix, AZ 85018
Office(602) 252-8384
www.huitt-zollars.com
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
SITE PLAN
GAMBLER'S ROW
R314395.03
9
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
Dial 8-1-1 or 1-800-STAKE-IT (782-5348)
In Maricopa County: (602) 263-1100
Call at least two full working days
before you begin excavation.
Arizona Blue Stake, Inc.
®
JM
STAFF
JM
3/2/2023
3/7/23
8
MATCH SHEET 9
MATCH SHEET 5
2246.7
2244.8
2242.6
2240.8
2241.5
2244.5
2245.3
2249.6
2248.5
2246.3
2243.3
2240.9
2238.8
2240.5
2243.5
2245.6
2247.6
2246.5
2245.6
2243.7
2239.4
2248.5
2247.3
2243.6
2241.2
2238.4
2240.7
2248.3
2250
2245
2245
2245
2240
2240
BEN JORDAN ACRES
RU-43
506-06-060
BEN JORDAN
RU-43
506-06-061A
519TH AVE
519TH AVE
9
MATCH SHEET 8
MATCH SHEET 6
MATCH SHEET 7
BASIN "A"
HW = 2239.0
BOT = 2238.0
Vp = 3.1
Vr = 2.7
SHEET
PROJECT NO.
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
PLOT DATE:
OF
Land Planning Hydrology Land Development Civil Infrastructure Surveying
5050 N 40th Street, Suite 100 | Phoenix, AZ 85018
Office(602) 252-8384
www.huitt-zollars.com
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
SITE PLAN
GAMBLER'S ROW
R314395.03
9
Dial 8-1-1 or 1-800-STAKE-IT (782-5348)
In Maricopa County: (602) 263-1100
Call at least two full working days
before you begin excavation.
Arizona Blue Stake, Inc.
®
JM
STAFF
JM
3/2/2023
3/7/23
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
NARRATIVE REPORT
FOR
GAMBLER’S ROW
Case no. Z2022171
Prepared:
Aug 9, 2022
Second Revision:
Mar. 06, 2023
Prepared by:
HUITT-ZOLLARS, INC.
5050 N 40TH STREET
SUITE 100
PHOENIX, AZ
85018
602.252.8384
johnmireles@huitt-zollars.com
Jan 4, 2023
i
NARRATIVE REPORT
GAMBLER’S ROW
Table of Contents
1 PURPOSE OF REQUEST ......................................................................................... 1
2 LOCATION ........................................................................................................... 1
3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................ 1
4 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS .................................................................... 7
5 LIGHTING ............................................................................................................ 9
6 SIGNAGE ........................................................................................................... 10
7 DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE .................................................................................. 10
8 MANURE HANDLING............................................................................................ 10
9 DUST CONTROL ................................................................................................. 10
10 RELATIONSHIP TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES ................................................... 11
11 CIRCULATION SYSTEMS ...................................................................................... 11
12 PARKING ........................................................................................................... 12
13 COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES ................................................................ 13
14 PUBLIC UTILITIES AND SERVICES ......................................................................... 13
Reference Plans
Site Plan
NARRATIVE REPORT
GAMBLER’S ROW
1 PURPOSE OF REQUEST
Wickenburg is about 25 miles east of the subject project. Wickenburg advertises itself
as the team roping capital of the world. They may be right. Thousands of people travel to
Wickenburg during the winter season to participate in team roping events. The owner wishes
to construct a facility for equine events that require cattle such as team roping, cutting,
working cow horse and others as well as a RV Park. The proposed name of the facility is
Gambler’s Row.
2 LOCATION
Gambler’s Row proposed location will be adjacent to the west side of Eagle Eye Rd.
about 1,485 feet south of the intersection of Pete Road and Eagle Eye Road in Section 34,
Township 7N, Range 9W. It will occupy APN 506-06-061B and a portion of the south half of APN
506-06-061A which will require an interior lot line adjustment. The proposed Gambler’s Row is
also located east of and adjacent to a proposed 45 lot subdivision being developed by the
owner of Gambler’s Row under subdivision case number S2022008.
3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Gambler’s Row will consist of two outdoor arenas, one indoor arena, cattle holding
pens, cattle sorting pens, parking areas, areas for retail and concession vendors, public
restrooms, RV parks, RV park comfort stations, RV park office, horse stalls, facility shop and hay
storage. The RV Park will be owned and operated by the owner of Gambler’s Row. Gambler’s
Row will see seasonal usage. The season starts in October and ends in March. Events are
planned for daylight hours. On occasions, due to participants beyond expectation, events may
NARRATIVE REPORT
GAMBLER’S ROW
last into the evening hours. That is why the outdoor arenas have lighting. The Maricopa County
outdoor noise regulations will be followed. Also, all PA system speakers will be pointed in a
southerly direction toward vacant land.
3.1
RV Park
Two RV Parks are proposed for Gambler’s Row referred to as the West RV Park
and the East RV Park. The West RV Park consists of 95 spaces and two comfort
stations. The East RV Park consists of 45 spaces and one comfort station. The
RV Parks will be owned and operated by the owner of Gambler’s Row as a part
of the equine event facility. The comfort stations will contain restrooms,
showers and laundry facilities. The comfort stations are for the exclusive use
of the RV Park residents. They are not public restrooms. All of the spaces are
pull-throughs and angled at 45° to all streets. The RV Park interior streets are
all one way with proposed construction matching paragraph 11.0 below. A
check in booth / office is also provided. See the table below for estimated
occupancy. The RV Park is for event participants. The lower summer season
occupancy corresponds with the lower number of events as shown in the
indoor arena event table in Paragraph 3.2 and a lower number of participants
per event.
NARRATIVE REPORT
GAMBLER’S ROW
RV Park Annual Occupancy
Estimates
Total Spaces140
RV Park
Occupied
Month
% Full
Spaces
1
90%
126
2
90%
126
3
75%
105
4
45%
63
5
15%
21
6
15%
21
7
15%
21
8
15%
21
9
45%
63
10
75%
105
11
75%
105
12
90%
126
Annual Occupancy
NARRATIVE REPORT
GAMBLER’S ROW
3.2
Arenas
Two outdoor arenas are proposed as shown on the site plan. Gambler’s Row
will see seasonal usage. The outdoor arenas season starts in September and
ends in April. The following table shows scheduled events for these arenas.
Outdoor Arenas Events per Year
Events
Events
Month
per week
per
month
1
4
16
2
4
16
3
4
16
4
2
8
5
0
0
6
0
0
7
0
0
8
0
0
9
2
8
10
4
16
11
4
16
12
4
16
Total per Year
112
NARRATIVE REPORT
GAMBLER’S ROW
One indoor arena is proposed as shown on the site plan. Gambler’s Row will
see seasonal usage. The indoor arena season starts in April and ends in
September. The following table shows scheduled events for this arena.
Indoor Arena Events per Year
Events
Events
Month
per week
per
month
1
0
0
2
0
0
3
0
0
4
1
4
5
1
4
6
1
4
7
1
4
8
1
4
9
1
4
10
0
0
11
0
0
12
0
0
Total per Year
24
3.3
Additional Accessories
3.3.1
Horse stalls are proposed for rent by RV Park residents and horse
owners from off site. Each stall will be provided with a water supply. See
the site plan for the water system layout.
NARRATIVE REPORT
GAMBLER’S ROW
3.3.2
Proposed events require cattle. The cattle will require turn out
pens, holding pens, sorting pens, sorting/feeding alley and shipping pens
which are all provided on the site plan.
3.3.3
Hay storage for cattle feeding and purchase by horse stall
renters is provided.
3.3.4
An area is provided south of the east outdoor arena for trailers
owned by retail vendors and concessioners. Water and power will be
provided for these trailers which do not belong to the Gamblers Row owner
and will be hauled in and out for events.
3.3.5
Public Restrooms are proposed for the two outdoor arenas and
the indoor arena. The proposed restrooms for the outdoor arenas will be
pre-fabricated using 40' by 8' shipping containers, shipped to the site and
installed. The two restrooms for the indoor arena will be constructed
within the foyer of the indoor arena.
NARRATIVE REPORT
GAMBLER’S ROW
4 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
4.1
The subject property is currently zoned RU-43. Lots are not being
created nor will lots be sold. See the table below for proposed standards.
Rural 43 Regulations (MCZO Section 503)
Maximum Building Height (Feet)
30
Minimum Yard Regulations:
Front
40
Rear
40
Interior Side
30
Street Side
20
Minimum Lot Area (SQ. FT.)
43,560
Minimum Lot Width (Feet)
145
Minimum Lot Area per dwelling Unit (SQ. FT.)
43,560
Maximum Lot Coverage (% of Lot)
25%
4.2
A portion of the proposed development under this SUP application will
be used for a RV Park with 140 spaces and three comfort stations. See the site
plan. The proposed RV Park is for the exclusive use of pickups pulling horse
trailers with living quarters. Typical travel trailers, motorhomes and mobile
homes will not be allowed. See the table below for the proposed standards.
NARRATIVE REPORT
GAMBLER’S ROW
MCZO Article 1203.1 Recreational Vehicle Park Standards
MCZO
Proposed
1203.1.1.
RV Spaces (1)
Minimum area
sf
3,000
1,740
Minimum average width
ft
44
30
1203.1.2.
RV's will conform to required setback & County plumbing & health codes.
1203.1.3.
RV Setbacks
Space boundaries
ft
5
5
Lot lines or screening
ft
10
10
1203.1.4.
RV Setbacks
Other RV's and buildings
ft
10
10
1203.1.5.
RV Setbacks
Front lot line clear area
ft
10
10
Side street lot lines
ft
10
10
1203.1.6.
Comfort stations will comply with MCHD and MCES requirements.
1203.1.7.
The streets bounding the SUP site will be constructed to MCDOT standards.
1203.1.8.
Design and construction of on and off site drainage improvements will be in accordance with the
requirements of MCDPD and the Flood Control District.
1203.7.9.
Fire protection will be provided by the Aguila Volunteer Fire Dept. and their requirements will be
met.
1203.1.11.
RV Park Interior Roadways (2)
Width
ft
26
16
Surfacing
2" AC over
4" ABC
1" of 3/4" rock
over compacted
native material
NARRATIVE REPORT
GAMBLER’S ROW
1203.1.12.
RV Park Screening (3)
Suitable planting height
ft
6
6
1203.1.14.
A licensed engineer shall certify the completion of the RV Park in accordance with the approved
development plan.
1203.1.15.
There are no subdivision lots of any kind within the SUP.
1203.1.16.
There is no access to any of the RV spaces from a public street.
1203.1.17.
RV Park residents have access to all SUP facilities for recreation.
1203.1.18.
RV Park signs shall comply with Chapter 14, Article 1406 of the MCZO.
1203.1.19.
Parking in the RV Park shall comply with Chapter 11, Article 1102.
1203.1.20.
RV Park lighting will reflect away from adjoining rural or residential zoning
districts and comply with any adopted County Outdoor Lighting Ordinance.
(1) The proposed RV Park is for the exclusive use of pickups pulling horse trailers with
living quarters. Typical travel trailers, motorhomes and mobile homes will not be allowed.
(2) All of the RV spaces are pull-throughs and angled at 45° to all streets. The RV Park
interior streets are all one way with proposed construction matching paragraph 11.0 below.
(3) The proposed screening is irrigated bamboo pruned to a height of six feet, irrigated
and planted to a thickness that will screen the RV park.
5 LIGHTING
Exterior lighting will consist of stadium type lighting for the outdoor arenas and wall
mounted lighting on the exterior of the indoor arena. All will be LED’s purchased and installed
in accordance with the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance Section 1112. Exterior lighting will
face away from residential areas.
NARRATIVE REPORT
GAMBLER’S ROW
6 SIGNAGE
One sign is proposed at the main entrance which is from a new street called Gambler’s
Way. This sign will conform to Section 1402 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
7 DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE
Construction of Phase 1 of the facility is planned to start in the Fall of 2023 and be
completed in the Spring of 2024. Construction of Phase 2 is planned to start in the Spring of
2024 and be completed in the Fall of 2024.
8 MANURE HANDLING
Manure in horse stalls will be removed daily, deposited in dumpsters and hauled to a
local farm for fertilizer. Manure in the cattle sorting pens will be removed after each event,
deposited in dumpsters and hauled to a local farm for fertilizer. The density of the cattle in the
holding pens will preclude manure removal. The size and number of dumpsters will be
selected for weekly hauling and dumping.
9 DUST CONTROL
Two, 4,000 gallon water trucks will be used to constantly water all interior streets, RV
parks and parking areas on event days. Prior to each event day, 1,100 gallons of water per acre
will be applied to these areas. On other non-event days, water will be applied to these areas
as needed.
NARRATIVE REPORT
GAMBLER’S ROW
10 RELATIONSHIP TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
This proposed project is adjacent to and west of Eagle Eye Road about 1,485 feet south
of Pete Road. The property to the north between this project and Pete Road (506-06-061A)
belongs to the owner of this project, is zoned RU-43 and is un-developed and vacant. The
property to the south (506-06-059A) belongs to the owner of this project, is zoned RU-43 and is
undeveloped and vacant. The property to the west (506-06-060) belongs to the owner of this
project, is zoned RU-43 and is undeveloped and vacant. The owner of this project proposes to
develop a 45 lot subdivision on this property under subdivision case number S2022008. The
property to the east, on the east side of Eagle Eye road (506-06-062) is zoned RU-43 and is
undeveloped and vacant.
11 CIRCULATION SYSTEMS
11.1 A separate Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was prepared for the facility and the
proposed 45 lot subdivision to the west of and adjacent to the facility. The TIA
is enclosed with the SUP application package.
11.2 The proposed construction of interior streets is compacted native material
overlain with 1.0” of 3/4" minus crushed rock. The proposed drainage channel
crossings are at grade crossings. There will be more horse traffic on the interior
streets than vehicle traffic. The proposed street construction will be far less
conducive to legs injuries than pavement. In addition to the pickups hauling
horses and cars with spectators traveling to and from events, there will be
tractor trailer rigs entering and leaving Gambler’s Row with cattle and hay. A
NARRATIVE REPORT
GAMBLER’S ROW
separate entrance for these rigs is provided on the west side of Gambler’s Row.
At the peak of the season there will be 2.0 hay trucks and 1.0 cattle trucks
entering and leaving per week.
11.3 The main access to the site is on the south side of the east parking lot from a
new street called Gambler’s Way. Access to the site by hay and cattle truck is
on the west side, north of the RV Park from 519th Avenue. There are no interior
rights-of-way.
12 PARKING
The event that will draw the most participants will be team roping. The largest event is
expected to consist of 1,050 teams. Article 1102.1 of the Ordinance requires one parking space
per 200 square feet of floor area. There is no floor area since the indoor arena is an arena for
equine event use. There will be bleachers measuring 20 ft by 200 ft at each arena. 3 arenas *
20 ft * 200 ft is 12,000 square feet. At one parking space per 200 square feet, 60 parking spaces
would be required. 298 parking spaces are being provided because parking is needed for
participants more than spectators. Rancho Rio, a similar facility in Wickenburg, has the largest
events with the most participants. It has two outdoor arenas and six total acres of parking.
Gambler’s Row will have three arenas and 15 acres of parking. Parking spaces are restricted to
event participants and spectators. There is no public parking. Sheet 2 of the plans shows the
layout of the RV spaces with one vehicle parking space per RV space.
NARRATIVE REPORT
GAMBLER’S ROW
13 COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES
Telephone
Table Top Telephone Co.
Internet
Table Top Telephone Co.
Police
Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office
Fire Protection
Aguila Volunteer Fire Dept.
Elementary School Aguila Elementary School
High School
Wickenburg Consolidated or
Bicentennial Union
Refuse
CR&R Environmental Services
14 PUBLIC UTILITIES AND SERVICES
14.1
The potable water provider is Aguila Water Services, Inc. (AWS), a
private water company regulated by the Corporation Commission. AWS has a
main of various sizes under Pete Road from Eagle Eye Road approximately
3,900 feet west. The largest pipe size in the main is 4 inch. It is proposed that
the entire main be converted to 4 inch pipe and extended along Pete Road to
the Northwest corner of Section 34.
14.2
The owner of Gambler’s Row is developing a proposed 45 lot
subdivision west of and adjacent to Gambler’s Row under subdivision case
NARRATIVE REPORT
GAMBLER’S ROW
number S2022008. It is proposed that the re-built main under Pete Road feed
a new water storage tank located on the south side of Pete Road within the
subdivision as part of a satellite system that will serve the subdivision and
Gambler’s Row. The storage tank will discharge, through pressure pumps, to
mains flowing south within the subdivision to a main within the Section 34
east-west mid-section line road, Gambler’s Way, which will feed Gambler’s Row
to the east.
14.3
There are no wastewater treatment facilities within 30 miles of the
subject project. Wastewater collection, treatment and disposal will be by on
site systems.
14.4
There will be up to 820 head of horses and cattle housed at Gambler’s
Row. In addition, Gambler’s Row will consume up to 31,000 gallons of water
per day for dust control. This water is not required to be potable. A separate
water system, not connected to the potable system, will be constructed to fill
these water needs. The system will include a well, water storage, pressure
pumps and a water distribution system.
14.5
The Aguila Volunteer Fire Department provides local fire protection.
Gambler’s Row will provide fire hydrants, water mains, water storage and
pressure pumps in accordance with their requirements.
14.6
Electricity will be provided by Arizona Public Service.
Jim Kary, PE
Planning & Development
301 W. Jefferson St., Suite 170
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
Phone: (602) 506-8799
www.maricopa.gov/planning
email address:
jim.kary@maricopa.gov
Maricopa County
Planning & Development Department
Date:
January 20,2023
Memo To: Darren Gerard, AICP, Planning Manager, Department of Planning &
Development
Attn:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero, Planner, Planning & Development Services
cc:
Michael Norris P.E., Engineering Manager, Planning and Development
From:
Jim Kary, Plans Examiner Engineer, Planning & Development
Subject:
Z2022171 - Gamblers Row PSEIS
APN(s):
506-06-061A and -061B
Engineering Review has reviewed the 2nd plan and report routed for review on
01/10/2023, for the subject application and has the following comments:
DRAINAGE PLAN REVIEW
The following comments shall be addressed on the first Building Permit
submittal. Strikethroughs indicate that the comment has been addressed.
1. OFFSITE HYDROLOGY
a. Appendix A2, Weighted Runoff Coefficient Calculations Table – The
drainage map indicates that subbasins are for the subdivision to the west
of this project. Revise table accordingly.
2. ONSITE HYDROLOGY
a. Email me an Land Use exhibit that shows which parts of the site are being
analyze as the 4 different Land Uses for the Gamblers Row Weighted
Runoff Coefficient Calculation. Include the name and contact information
for the individual who I can contact to discuss any comments I may have.
3. ONSITE RETENTION
a. Drainage report section 6.3 Stormwater Storage – Retention basins shall
infiltrate all of the runoff into the ground. Outfall pipes will not be allowed
unless they drain to a larger retention basin that will infiltrate the runoff.
4. RETENTION DISPOSAL
a. Retention basins must drain within the required 36 hours. Drywells or soil
percolation test will be required to verify the retention basins will drain in 36
hrs. This information must be submitted with the first Building permit
Submittal.
Page 2 of 4
5. RUNOFF ROUTING
a. The Drainage report On-Site exhibit in the drainage report shows that runoff
for Collector Channel 1 will route runoff from Gamblers Row to Ben Jordan
Acres. Runoff must enter and exit a property in the historic location. Revise
plan and Drainage Report as required.
b. Update the Drainage Report On-Site Culvert 3 channel to the outfall for
Drainage Pipe 2 which is the historical outfall for the washes. Show how
the Culvert 4 and 5 channels will be routed to the historical outfalls.
c. Drainage Report section 3 Development Standards, Item 1 - Natural
washes/channels must enter and exit the site in the historic location.
Revise the drainage report and plat as required.
d. See attached Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa County – Hydraulics
and revise the channel designs to meet the FCD’s requirements for Froude
numbers.
6. CROSS SECTIONS
a. No comments.
7. FINISHED FLOORS (PADS)
a. No comments.
8. TOPOGRAPHY
a. No comments.
9. FLOODPLAINS
a. The site is in a SFHA Zone X.
10. EROSION SETBACKS
a. This item does not apply to this application.
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT REVIEW
a. The site is in a SFHA Zone X.
PND TRANSPORTATION PLAN REVIEW
a. No comments.
PND TRANSPORTATION PLAN REVIEW R/W INFORMATION
a. Eagle Eye Road is classified as a future principal arterial. A 65-ft half-width
right-of-way dedication is required for Eagle Eye Road from the section line.
Page 3 of 4
b. Further coordination on requirements to perimeter roadways is needed.
Please reach out to Denise Lacey at Denise.Lacey@maricopa.gov or 602-
506-6712 for further input.
c. Any additional dedication and offsite improvements needed will be
determined by MCDOT Traffic and MCDOT Permits based on submittal of
a TIA/TIS.
d. See attached MCDOT’s TIS and Plat approval memo.
STORM WATER QUALITY REVIEW/INFORMATION
1. The subject site is not located within the County’s Urbanized Area. A Storm
Water Pollution Prevention Permit (SWPPP) from the County will not be
required prior to issuance of any construction permits. This does NOT preclude
the requirement to obtain a Notice of Intent to Discharge (NOID) from the State
(ADEQ), as may be required.
The following stipulations will apply:
1. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design
only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with
Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and
Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway
Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices
at the time of application for construction.
2. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes
to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the
site’s drainage infrastructure.
3. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Site Infrastructure) Plans must be submitted
with the application for Building Permits
Please contact me with any questions.
Page 4 of 4
DRAINAGE PLAN REVIEW REFERENCES:
The Drainage Regulations are listed in Section 1205 of the MCZO:
https://www.maricopa.gov/documentcenter/view/272
Maricopa County Drainage Policies and Standards Manual:
https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/Home/View/2369
For Additional Information See:
https://www.maricopa.gov/1635/Drainage-Review
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT OF MARICOPA COUNTY REFERENCES:
Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County:
https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/630
For Additional Information See:
https://www.maricopa.gov/3847/Flood-Control-District
PND TRANSPORTATION REFERENCES:
Residential Driveway Guidelines
https://www.maricopa.gov/documentcenter/view/362
Roadway Design Manual
http://www.mcdot.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/24883
Maricopa County Resolution for ROW Permits
https://www.maricopa.gov/documentcenter/view/364
For Additional Information See:
https://www.maricopa.gov/156/MCDOT
PND STORMWATER QUALITY (SWPPP) REFERENCES:
Storm Water Quality Management and Discharge Control Regulation
https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/6577
Air Pollution Control Regulations Rule 310
https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/5354
For Additional Information See:
https://www.maricopa.gov/3980/Water-Sewage-Stormwater-Waste
F:\Traffic Impact Studies\Ben Jordan Acres and Event Center\Ben Jordan Acres & Event Center TIS 1st Reveiw Comments.docx
MCDOT -- TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
REVIEW COMMENT SHEET
1 of 1
Project Name: Ben Jordan Acres and Event Center
Location: SWC of Pete Rd and Eagle Eye Rd
MCDOT File No.: Z2022171 & S2022008
Date: 12/15/2022
Reviewer: Amber Cauble
Phone No.: 602.319.0988
Consultant: CivTech Inc.
Project No.:
Plans Sealed By: David S. Duffy Jr., PE
Consultant Code:
A = Will Comply
B = Deleted
C = Consultant to Evaluate
Item
Number
Page
Number
Comments
Consultant
Reply
= = =
1.
2.
3.
= = =
General
General
General
2nd REVIEW (TIS)
Consultant: Please use the code and respond to each comment in the
Consultant Reply Column. This sheet is for our record, please answer every
question and sign and date your acknowledgement or the plans will be
sent back to complete the process. Send back the marked-up plans and a
new set of plans along with this comment sheet. Thank you for your
cooperation.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Project Summary:
The proposed single family home development and event center is located
near the southwest corner of Pete Rd and Eagle Eye Rd in unincorporated
Maricopa County.
The proposed equine event center is planned to consist of two (2) event
buildings, three (3) arenas, restaurant, retail store, and RV park with
additional parking for event days. The site proposes new private roadways
providing access to the event center.
The proposed residential development is planned to consist of 48 single-
family homes over 115 acres. The site proposes a total of three (3)
driveways, two (2) new driveways on Pete Rd and one (1) new driveway on a
new private road.
Per the TIS, the trip generation is based on ITE LUC code 220 – Single
Family Detached Housing. Without an appropriate ITE LUC code for an event
center, various calculations were used from similar studies. Upon opening in
2023, with maximum event volume, the combined sites are anticipated to
generate 1,830 total daily trips with 367 AM peak hour trips and 248 PM peak
hour trips.
Review Comments:
The south bound right turn deceleration lane, as identified in the study on
Eagle Eye Rd with minimum storage of 160 feet, is acceptable to MCDOT.
The classification of Eagle Eye Rd is principal arterial roadway. As part of
half-street improvements, dedicate a minimum 65’ ROW to MCDOT along site
frontage of Eagle Eye Rd.
As the new interior roadways will remain private, MCDOT has no further
comment on this matter.
The Traffic Impact Study is Approved as noted.
Signature: _____________________________________ Date: ___________
Use CODE
"A", "B","C"
in this column
next to every
comment.
= = = =
Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa County
Hydraulics: Open Channels
abruptly over a relatively short distance. Examples of rapidly varied flow include local phenom-
ena, such as hydraulic jumps and hydraulic drops. Under steady flow conditions, if the depth of
flow along the length of the channel gradually increases or decreases it is gradually varied. This
is the usual condition in open channel flow. Gradually varied flow occurs under either subcritical
or supercritical flow regimes. Water surface profile computations are required to estimate the
depth of flow for varied flow conditions at any given location as described in Section 6.3.6.
6.3.2
Flow Regimes
Froude Number
The state of open channel flow is governed by the effects of viscosity and gravity relative to the
inertial forces of the flow. The effect of gravity on the state of flow is represented by a ratio of
inertial forces to gravity forces. This ratio is given by the Froude number, defined as:
F
= ~
rJid
(6.1)
where V is the mean velocity (ft/sec), g is the acceleration of gravity (ft/sec2), and d is the hydrau-
lic depth (ft) which is the cross sectional area of the water, A (sq ft), divided by the width of the
free surface, T (ft).
0
When F,. is equal to 1, the flow is in the critical state. This flow condition is unstable and flow
C
depths at or near critical depth should be avoided. If F,. is less than 1, the flow is subcritical and
gravity forces dominate. When F,. is greater than 1, the flow is supercritical and inertial forces
predominate.
Specific Energy
Specific energy in a channel section is defined as the energy per pound of water at any section of
a channel measured with respect to the channel bottom and may be expressed as:
v2
2
E = y+ -
= y+ __Q_
2g
2gA2
(6.2)
When the depth of flow is plotted against the specific energy for a given channel section and dis-
charge, a specific energy curve is obtained (Figure 6.1 ).
The specific energy curve has two
limbs, AC and BC. The limb AC approaches the horizontal axis asymptotically toward the right.
The limb BC approaches the line 00 as it extends upwards and to the right. The line 00 has an
angle of inclination equal to 45°. At any point P on this curve, the ordinate represents the depth
of flow, and the abscissa represents the specific energy that is equal to the sum of the pressure
head, y, and the velocity head, V2!2g . The curve shows that, for a given specific energy, there
6-8
August 15, 201 3
Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa County
Hydraulics: Open Channels
are two possible depths, the low stage, y 1, and the high stage, Y2· The low stage is called the
alternate depth of the high stage and vice versa.
At point C, the specific energy is a minimum and the stage is at critical depth. When the depth of
flow is greater than the critical depth, the velocity of flow is less than the critical velocity and the
flow is subcritical. When the depth of flow is less than the critical depth, the flow is supercritical.
Inspection of the energy curve in the vicinity of critical depth reveals that a small change in the
energy will result in a relatively large change in the depth of flow. For this reason, it is strongly
recommended that flow depths producing Froude numbers between 0.87 and 1.13 be avoided.
The Froude Number limit for all types of channel linings is F,.-:; 0.86. For concrete and shotcrete
lined channels, the additional range of 1.13-:;, F,.-:;, 2.0 is allowed. F,. should not fall between 0.86
and 1.13 in order to maintain stable flow conditions.
Due to safety concerns resulting from
excessively high velocities and intractable hydraulic forces, the recommended upper limit of F,. is
2.0 except at certain structures such as drop structures.
August 15, 2013
FIGURE 6.1
SPECIFIC ENERGY CURVE
{MODIFIED FROM: Chow, 1959)
y
ot zero or smoll slope
E
Specific Energy, ft
6-9
Subdivision Infrastructure &
Planning Program
1001 N. Central Avenue #150
Phoenix, Arizona 85004
Phone: (602) 506-1058
Fax: (602) 506-5813
TDD 602 506 6704
Maricopa County
Environmental Services Department
Water and Waste Management Division
DATE:
September 26, 2022
TO :
Paola Jaramillo, Planning & Development Dept.
Planner
FROM:
Souren Naradikian, P.E.
Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT:
SUP for tow RV parks, Subdivision, Cattle sale arena-two. Z2022171
The Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MCESD) has reviewed
documents received from the Maricopa County Planning and Development
Department for the above referenced project. This project requests is SUP for tow
RV parks, Subdivision, Cattle sale arena-two at APN# 506-06-061B & 506-06-061A.
Water and sewer services information is Aguila Water Services, Inc. water and no
sewer disposal service information. MCESD has concerns, ATC (Well site Water
distribution lines, Water storage tank, Booster pump station) must be obtained prior
to final plat approval. Please contact the Water/Wastewater Treatment
Program at (602) 372-2861 or email
treatmentplantprogram@maricopa.gov for additional information.
For any food service operations occurring on site, where food is offered, sold, or
prepared from a fixed/permanent location, requires submittal of a Permanent/Fixed
Food Establishment Permit application. Additional information for permanent/fixed
establishments can be found on the Environmental Health webpage. For questions,
please call 602-506-6824.
A Mobile Home Park Application (2) is required and must be submitted to MCESD’s
Subdivision & Infrastructure Program for construction of mobile home park and/or
RV park, or for the addition of spaces. Mobile Home parks may require additional
permitting with MCESD Onsite Wastewater, Subdivision and Infrastructure, Drinking
Water, and Water and Wastewater Treatment programs. For questions, please
contact the Subdivision and Infrastructure Program at (602) 506-1058 or email
subdivision@maricopa.gov.
Based on the above, MCESD raised no objection to this project to the Planning &
Development Department in Accela Automation on September 26, 2022 and the
project may proceed at this time subject to the following stipulations:
Stipulations:
None.
It should be noted that this document does not approve the referenced project.
Comments are provided only as advisory to Maricopa County Planning and
Development Department to assist staff to prepare a staff report. Other Maricopa
County agencies may have additional requirements. Final review and approval will be
Water and Waste Management
Division
1001 N. Central Avenue #150
Phoenix, Arizona 85004
Phone: (602) 506-6666
Fax: (602) 506-6925
TDD 602 506 6704
made through Planning and Development Department procedures. Applicant may
need to submit separate applications to the Maricopa County Environmental Services
Department for approval of proposed facilities regulated by the Department. Review
of any such application will be based on regulations in force at the time of
application.
F:\Traffic Impact Studies\Ben Jordan Acres and Event Center\Ben Jordan Acres & Event Center TIS Reveiw Comments.docx
MCDOT -- TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
REVIEW COMMENT SHEET
1 of 1
Project Name: Ben Jordan Acres and Event Center
Location: SWC of Pete Rd and Eagle Eye Rd
MCDOT File No.: Z2022171 & S2022008
Date: 05/15/2023
Reviewer: Amber Cauble
Phone No.: 602.319.0988
Consultant: CivTech Inc.
Project No.:
Plans Sealed By: David S. Duffy Jr., PE
Consultant Code:
A = Will Comply B = Deleted
C = Consultant to Evaluate
Item
Number
Page
Number
Comments
Consultant
Reply
= = =
1.
2.
3.
= = =
General
General
General
2nd REVIEW (TIS) AMENDMENT
Consultant: Please use the code and respond to each comment in the
Consultant Reply Column. This sheet is for our record, please answer every
question and sign and date your acknowledgement or the plans will be
sent back to complete the process. Send back the marked-up plans and a
new set of plans along with this comment sheet. Thank you for your
cooperation.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Project Summary:
The proposed single family home development and event center is located
near the southwest corner of Pete Rd and Eagle Eye Rd in unincorporated
Maricopa County.
The proposed equine event center is planned to consist of two (2) event
buildings, three (3) arenas, restaurant, retail store, and RV park with
additional parking for event days. The site proposes new private roadways
providing access to the event center.
The proposed residential development is planned to consist of 48 single-
family homes over 115 acres. The site proposes a total of three (3)
driveways, two (2) new driveways on Pete Rd and one (1) new driveway on a
new road.
Per the TIS, the residential trip generation is based on ITE LUC code 220 –
Single Family Detached Housing. Calculations were used from similar
studies to project volumes for the equine event center. Upon opening in
2023, with maximum event volume, the combined sites are anticipated to
generate 1,830 total daily trips with 367 AM peak hour trips and 248 PM peak
hour trips.
Review Comments:
The south bound right turn deceleration lane, as identified in the study on
Eagle Eye Rd with minimum storage of 160 feet, is acceptable to MCDOT.
The classification of Eagle Eye Rd is principal arterial roadway. As part of
half-street improvements, dedicate a minimum 65’ ROW to MCDOT along site
frontage of Eagle Eye Rd.
Per MCDOT Planning: If the intention is to dedicate subdivision
roadways to Maricopa County, the roadways must meet the standards
set forth in the MCDOT Roadway Development Manual (most recent
edition).
The Traffic Impact Study is Approved as noted.
Signature: _____________________________________ Date: ___________
Use CODE
"A", "B","C"
in this column
next to every
comment.
= = = =
F:\Traffic Impact Studies\Ben Jordan Acres and Event Center\Ben Jordan Acres & Event Center TIS 1st Reveiw Comments.docx
MCDOT -- TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
REVIEW COMMENT SHEET
1 of 1
Project Name: Ben Jordan Acres and Event Center
Location: SWC of Pete Rd and Eagle Eye Rd
MCDOT File No.: Z2022171 & S2022008
Date: 12/15/2022
Reviewer: Amber Cauble
Phone No.: 602.319.0988
Consultant: CivTech Inc.
Project No.:
Plans Sealed By: David S. Duffy Jr., PE
Consultant Code:
A = Will Comply
B = Deleted
C = Consultant to Evaluate
Item
Number
Page
Number
Comments
Consultant
Reply
= = =
1.
2.
3.
= = =
General
General
General
2nd REVIEW (TIS)
Consultant: Please use the code and respond to each comment in the
Consultant Reply Column. This sheet is for our record, please answer every
question and sign and date your acknowledgement or the plans will be
sent back to complete the process. Send back the marked-up plans and a
new set of plans along with this comment sheet. Thank you for your
cooperation.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Project Summary:
The proposed single family home development and event center is located
near the southwest corner of Pete Rd and Eagle Eye Rd in unincorporated
Maricopa County.
The proposed equine event center is planned to consist of two (2) event
buildings, three (3) arenas, restaurant, retail store, and RV park with
additional parking for event days. The site proposes new private roadways
providing access to the event center.
The proposed residential development is planned to consist of 48 single-
family homes over 115 acres. The site proposes a total of three (3)
driveways, two (2) new driveways on Pete Rd and one (1) new driveway on a
new private road.
Per the TIS, the trip generation is based on ITE LUC code 220 – Single
Family Detached Housing. Without an appropriate ITE LUC code for an event
center, various calculations were used from similar studies. Upon opening in
2023, with maximum event volume, the combined sites are anticipated to
generate 1,830 total daily trips with 367 AM peak hour trips and 248 PM peak
hour trips.
Review Comments:
The south bound right turn deceleration lane, as identified in the study on
Eagle Eye Rd with minimum storage of 160 feet, is acceptable to MCDOT.
The classification of Eagle Eye Rd is principal arterial roadway. As part of
half-street improvements, dedicate a minimum 65’ ROW to MCDOT along site
frontage of Eagle Eye Rd.
As the new interior roadways will remain private, MCDOT has no further
comment on this matter.
The Traffic Impact Study is Approved as noted.
Signature: _____________________________________ Date: ___________
Use CODE
"A", "B","C"
in this column
next to every
comment.
= = = =
W Donald Rd
W William Rd
W Donald Rd
N Cemetery Rd
W Pete Rd
N 514th Ave
N 510th Ave
N 520th Ave
W William
Rd
N 518th Ave
N 516th Ave
N 515th Ave
N 511th Ave
W William Rd
Pete Rd
Eagle Eye Rd
301 W. Jefferson St., Suite 170, Phoenix, Arizona 85003, (602) 506-3601
Document Path: \\gisteam.maricopa.gov\workgroup\patrick.dongarra\PlanningandDevelopment\OppositionCases\Z2022171\Z2022171.aprx
DISCLAIMER: This map is a graphical representation designed for general reference purposes only. Viewer/User agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Maricopa County, its officers, departments, employees and agents
from and against any and all suits, actions, legal or administrative proceedings, claims, demands or damages of any kind or nature arising out of the use of this map, or the data contained herein, in its actual or altered form.
www.maricopa.gov/planning
Maricopa County OET, GIS Division, 10/11/2023
Ü
830
0
830
415
Feet
Opposition and Support
Z2022171
Parcel
Subject Parcel
300' Buffer
Opposition Parcel
Supporting Parcel
All Opposition Parcels
All Supporting Parcels
300' Buffer Interior
300' Buffer Selection
Eligible parcels: 7
Supporting parcels: 5
Opposition parcels: 0
Supporting parcels sq ft: 2,171,748
Opposition parcels sq ft: 0
Subject parcels sq ft: 3,251,158
All area inside the 300' buffer:
5,909,204
All area inside the 300' buffer -
excluding subject parcel,
ROW and excluded parcels: 2,658,046
sq ft
No-response parcels sq ft: 0
Super Majority opposed parcel acres:
0%
Super Majority opposed parcel number:
0%
Alvin Rd
Black Eagle Rd
Eagle Ey
e
R
d
Valley Rd
523rd Ave
507th Ave
Pete Rd
A
B
71
£
¤
60
301 W. Jefferson St., Suite 170, Phoenix, Arizona 85003, (602) 506-3601
Document Path: \\gisteam.maricopa.gov\workgroup\patrick.dongarra\PlanningandDevelopment\OppositionCases\Z2022171\Z2022171.aprx
DISCLAIMER: This map is a graphical representation designed for general reference purposes only. Viewer/User agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Maricopa County, its officers, departments, employees and agents
from and against any and all suits, actions, legal or administrative proceedings, claims, demands or damages of any kind or nature arising out of the use of this map, or the data contained herein, in its actual or altered form.
www.maricopa.gov/planning
Maricopa County OET, GIS Division, 10/11/2023
Ü
1,000
0
1,000
500
Feet
Opposition and Support
Z2022171
Parcel
Subject Parcel
300' Buffer
Opposition Parcel
Supporting Parcel
All Opposition Parcels
All Supporting Parcels
300' Buffer Interior
300' Buffer Selection
Eligible parcels: 7
Supporting parcels: 5
Opposition parcels: 0
Supporting parcels sq ft: 2,171,748
Opposition parcels sq ft: 0
Subject parcels sq ft: 3,251,158
All area inside the 300' buffer:
5,909,204
All area inside the 300' buffer -
excluding subject parcel,
ROW and excluded parcels: 2,658,046
sq ft
No-response parcels sq ft: 0
Super Majority opposed parcel acres:
0%
Super Majority opposed parcel number:
0%
1
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
From:
Dennis Huwe <dkhuwe@gmail.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, February 14, 2023 3:34 PM
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
Proposed Equine facility South of Aguila, AZ
This is to inform you that I and a good number of my neighbors in the two air parks located near the proposed facility
are either neutral or in favor of the facility.
The presentation by Carolyn and F. Leland Jones contains many factual errors and misrepresentations
A resident of Valley of the Eagle air park
Dennis Huwe
Sent from my iPad
From:
Chyane Soffel
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
Support Letter
Date:
Tuesday, September 5, 2023 1:22:06 PM
From:
Chyane Soffel
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
Support Letters
Date:
Tuesday, September 5, 2023 12:44:39 PM
From:
Chyane Soffel
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
Support letter
Date:
Tuesday, September 5, 2023 12:38:39 PM
1
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
From:
RAY BORZINI <rayborzini@msn.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, September 5, 2023 2:16 PM
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
Aguila Roping Project
Follow Up Flag:
Follow up
Flag Status:
Flagged
I’m so excited to see a new roping facility in Aguila. I think it will be great for the town! Ray Borzini Cave Creek Az 831-
206-6671
Sent from my iPad
1
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
From:
Claudia Conger Terrill <claudia@406red.com>
Sent:
Monday, September 25, 2023 12:16 AM
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
Letter of Support of Proposed Project – Case Number Z2022171
Follow Up Flag:
Follow up
Flag Status:
Flagged
To: Paola Jaramillo
Maricopa County Planning and Development
301 W. Jefferson St., #170
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Letter of Support of Proposed Project – Case Number Z2022171
Gambler’s Row Equine Facility
As a property owner less than 100 feet from the above proposed project, my wife and I strongly
SUPPORT this project. I am the owner of APN506-06-074B in the Eagle Roost Air Park. I am an
active commercial pilot with over 45 years of flight experience, and a certified flight instructor. We are not in
any way affiliated with the proposed development.
We own the first property in Eagle Roost that would be affected by this facility by wind, odor, dust or
drainage. We are satisfied with the Gambler’s Row plan to mitigate everything that comes with the
development. We do not feel that this project will be detrimental in any way to our property or our flying
lifestyle.
Planes, by their very nature, disrupt the peace and quiet of the desert. Parties claiming that an equestrian
facility will disrupt their environment need to look down their own runway. This is not a reason to deny this
development.
This facility will bring many benefits to Aguila and the surrounding area, the positive economic impact alone
justifies this project. The total economic impact of the horse industry in the United States is $122 billion,
creating 1.7 million jobs. About 31 percent of United States households contain a horse enthusiast.
Westworld, in Scottsdale, alone brings in over $112 million into Maricopa County and provides over 1,600
jobs. Gambler’s Row is not Westworld, but it can be a beacon of economic hope in a struggling community.
The misinformation being spread by individuals to the airpark residents, is inaccurate. I would like to address
some of the objections;
#1. “It’s too dangerous to have airplanes around livestock.” For over 45 years I have been an
agricultural aerial applicator, a crop duster. I mention that because it does qualify me to speak on the
interaction of airplanes and livestock since I routinely fly over them at very low levels. Stock rarely lift their
heads from grazing. State and Federal officials even use airplanes and helicopters for doing wild game
counts.
2
#2. “Gambler’s Way would be on final approach to Sampley Field.” True, GR is over a half mile from the end
of the runway. This is a statement, not a problem.
#3. “Airplanes crossing over will be approximately 500 feet above the ground at this point. Eagle Roost Airport
is less than a mile to the East, and traffic from that airport may pass over the proposed project.” Once again, this
is a statement, not a problem. Airpark planes pass over downtown Aguila.
#4. “Lights, dust, or movement on the ground could interfere with safe aircraft operations in the air, and aircraft
malfunctions.” This is a scare tactic. Pilot error can create a hazard, regardless of where they are. A horse or
cow will no more contribute to the above than a car on a dirt road.
#5. Location. The cities of Scottsdale, Las Vegas, Ocala Florida, Lexington Kentucky, Palm Springs,
Wilmington Ohio, and Wickenburg have all embraced equestrian facilities much larger than Gambler’s
Row. The parties protesting this development have stated that it’s a fine plan, just not in their back yard. Equine
facilities have been very beneficial for many areas, and the Aguila community deserves this opportunity.
And per the other concerns;
1. Noxious odors – our horses are within 50 feet of our house and we have no issues.
2. Light pollution – Arenas are lit for some events, but I've found the lights to be off by 10 pm.
3. Noise Pollution – Airplanes create noise pollution, especially WWII fighters. In the airpark CC&R’s
property owners agree to accept that... but, yet they want to limit the rights of their neighbors. I
don’t agree with that.
4. Dust Pollution – Dirt airstrips, such as Sampley, can create dust pollution. Wind creates dust. We are
confident that the water trucks will eliminate the dust issues. Competitive horse facilities are not dusty.
5. Traffic problems –There are not “Hundreds of trucks and horse trailers” going to any one location, at
any one time, any day, anywhere in Arizona. This is not a Super Bowl Stadium.
This equestrian facility will provide jobs, stimulate the local economy, raise property values including those in
the airparks, and support the struggling businesses already in the area. Let’s do the right thing and help Aguila
grow.
Please accept this email as our registered support of the equestrian project #Z2022171, we request that the
Planning & Zoning Commission approve the permit known as Gambler’s Row.
Guy J. Terrill - Property Owner
APN: 506-06-074B
TBD Pete Rd., Aguila, AZ
406-660-5660
1
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
From:
peavyhorses55 <peavyhorses55@gmail.com>
Sent:
Monday, April 3, 2023 9:35 AM
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
Protest of proposed project
Case #Z2022171
We live 1/2 mile downhill from proposed project. We fill there are too many unanswered questions. They have not
addressed some major problems such as:
Flooding
Road usage
Water
Etc.
We fill this will be a big mistake allowing something of this size into this small rural community.
Steve and Celia Boyd
51520 Donald road
P.o. box 334
Aguila, Arizona 85320
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
1
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
From:
Sabrina Symns <sabrina.symns@gmail.com>
Sent:
Saturday, February 25, 2023 12:04 PM
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
Case Number Z2022171 Gambler's Row Equine and RV Park
-Hello,
I would like to be informed about any public hearings or other information available to the public regarding the
Gambler's Row Equine and RV Park proposed project, case number Z2022171.
I have a home in Eagle Roost Air Park just adjacent to this proposed facility. I have several concerns about this project,
especially excessive noise from announcers, lights that restrict night sky viewing, dust and odors from livestock along
with possible soil and water pollution. I also believe that such a large facility with people and animals directly in the
flight path for the airport is irresponsible if not dangerous.
-My contact information is Sabrina Symns, cell 307-329-9108, email, sabrina.symns@gmail.com. My address is 50836 W
William Drive, Aguila AZ 85320.
Thank you for your time.
Sabrina Symns
1
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
From:
Gary Standhart <shortfielder83@gmail.com>
Sent:
Wednesday, February 22, 2023 7:36 PM
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
Re: Case Z2022
Hi Paola
Gary Standhart here. I suppose I am not telling you anything new, but still wanted to share my thoughts/concerns, and
disappointment that a development like this could be allowed in this area with you, about this development going in
south of my home at 51728 West Pete Rd. Aguila, Az.
I moved here 5 years ago from Durango Colo. I know up there the county was very concerned about conformity. I
don't know if that applies to Maricopa County or not, but this doesn't seem to be a conforming venture. It's not
agricultural, which most of the property in the area is. It is mostly commercial, which definitely isn't conforming to this
rural setting, and the lots for the residential part of this venture are 2.5 acres each where most of the lots in the area are
5 acres or more. Also, I would imagine that this will just be phase one, and if allowed to continue, will just worsen the
impact on this area.
And, another thing that REALLY bothers me is that this development is brought to this area by someone not from this
area, for, in the most part, people not from this area, that are seasonal visitors for most part, against the will of many in
this area, disrupting the lives/comforts/safety of people who are residents of this area, in many instances, for years and
year round, who moved here for the affordability and peace and quiet that the area, up until recently offered.
Another issue that doesn't seem to have had the appropriate attention is the fact they are putting in some water
retention areas that will be dual purpose for storing livestock with accumulating body waste from these animal, feces
and urine(knowing that some will be removed, but certainly not all), and when these areas overflow from seasonal rains,
which we know they will, much of this waste will flow downhill into neighboring yards and vegetation along. I feel there
are much better places for a development like this to go with all the vacant land around where they could go without a
negative impact to anyone.
Thanks for considering those that have been living here and enjoying this part of Maricopa County.
Gary Standhart
970.749.1844
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:40 AM Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND) <Paola.Jaramillo@maricopa.gov> wrote:
Good Morning Gary,
Thank you for providing your feedback. Per our phone conversation earlier, I have included you in the mailing list to
receive the hearing notice once the hearings have been scheduled for this Special Use Permit. Can you please be more
specific to what your concerns are in regards to this case?
Currently the request is in the 2nd review process. You may access the applicable request documents online
through Permit Manager at: https://accela.maricopa.gov/CitizenAccessMCOSS/Default.aspx.
Under Planning Services select ‘Search Applications’
1
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
From:
S. Christie <slchristie@yahoo.com>
Sent:
Monday, February 20, 2023 3:34 PM
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
Z2022171
I forgot to also mention in my previous email to you sent just a minute
about, but police and fire is also a big concern. If we have a medical
emergency or a fire emergency, we are told to call the fire station directly
as it can cause a huge delay by calling 911. We are a total volunteer fire
station. As for police, we are serviced by Maricopa County Sheriff's
Department. Being the furthest most part of the county, it can up to an
hour before we get a response from police. It's just how it is in such a rural
place. I think that should also be considered.
Sincerely,
Sheryl Christie
1
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
From:
S. Christie <slchristie@yahoo.com>
Sent:
Monday, February 20, 2023 3:30 PM
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
Z2022171
I am opposed to this proposed project. I have read everything that has been
submitted to the County regarding this project and never once does it
mention that there are two private, FAA-approved airparks right "next
door" to this proposed project. This type of facility does not fit in with the
surrounding area. Flight patterns go directly over the proposed facility at
low levels due to how close it is to our take off and landing strips.
I have great concern over the water. We struggle with water as it is right
now and adding that much more to our water table will definitely put a
burden on it. Just up the street a ways in Wenden, there is a water crisis
going on. When you add up all the water needed for dust control, watering
livestock, which they plan to house 830+, the RV park, vendors and
bathrooms for the roping events, and the future homes, this is really going
to be a strain. I'm sure the daily water usage will be over 100,000 gallons!
I have concern about the smell. I don't care how much someone tries to tell
me there will be no smell, I know better. There is no way to mask that
smell. I worry about the nitrites in the urine getting into the water table.
This can be very hazardous. I've been told that all the waste will be
removed every day there is an event and loaded into dumpsters. I doubt
these dumpsters are covered. There WILL be flies. Lots and lots of flies.
Then I wonder about the days there aren't any events. The waste will not
be removed and if there are 830+ housed livestock, that's a lot of waste.
One main source for nitrates in water is animal feedlots. Although this
place is a roping arena, it will contain as much livestock as a feedlot and
should be treated as such.
2
In a September 2022 letter from Maricopa County Environmental Services
indicates that they have concerns and says they must receive ATC (well
site water distribution lines, water storage tank, booster pump station)
information. They also state that the number of horse stalls is a lot and
question what the water situation is for the horses.
The traffic report is flawed -- like really flawed. This was done near the
end of May. Many residents in this area are snowbirds and are usually
gone by May. But this area is full to the brim in what is proposed to be the
busiest months of roping. The report is also flawed in that the speed limit
is not accurate. Not too far down Eagle Eye Road the speed limit turns to
40 mph and before reaching the entrances to Eagle Roost Airpark and
Samply Airpark, it is 50 mph. Traffic report should also include vendors,
hay trucks, cattle trucks, along with the normal rigs and spectators.
The Narrative Report for Gamblers Row indicates that the largest event is
expected to consist of 1,050 teams. A team consists of two people which
means 2,100 just as participants. Now most of them do not travel together.
They each bring their own truck pulling their own horse trailer. The
parking doesn't even come close to being sufficient.
Light pollution. Most of us in this community love our night skies. The
star gazing is amazing and this will be totally ruined by arena lights. They
say they are going to point them down, but their elevation is higher than
both of our airparks and so that will will be right at our eye level. It will be
a really big impact, as well as the noise. There will be much noise from
the events, including a PA system for the announcer.
Other impacts for Aguila, not just our airparks, will be the increased
traffic, increased use of our almost nonexistent facilities (this town has one
cafe and one gas station. There is a small mom and pop type grocery store
and a Family Dollar. The added housing this project plans to put in cannot
not be sustained by our current post office. All the boxes are spoken for
(there is not mail delivery here, you have to have a p.o. box). The lack of
3
amenities in our small community will put a burden on Wickenburg for
sure.
I'm not the best one to describe my thoughts in words, but I hope this
gives you some food for thought. I know these people have deep pockets
and, unfortunately, I realize those kinds of people get what they want. But
you must take a look at our community. Someone from the County should
come out here and physically take a look. For so many, many reasons this
project is not fitted for this community whatsoever.
Thank you for your time,
Sincerely,
Sheryl Christie
51112 W. Iver Rd.
Eagle Roost Airpark
Aguila, AZ 85320
(P.O. Box 186, Aguila, AZ 85320)
(928) 671-2550
1
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
From:
James Newsum <jdnewsum@gmail.com>
Sent:
Wednesday, February 15, 2023 4:03 PM
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
"Gamblers Row" proposed horse equestrian project in Aguila AZ
Hello Paola,
I am a homeowner in Aguila Arizona located in the Valley of the Eagle Airpark (Sampley's Airport), I have recently
become aware of the proposed project to construct an equestrian facility south of and directly next to the airpark. I am
in opposition to this large and intrusive project for the following reasons;
1.. Aviation Concerns from low flying aircraft flying to/from Sampleys Airport
2. Increased Traffic Problems. There are no traffic control devices such as stop lights etc. in Aguila and the heavy
truck/trailer and auto traffic that this facility will bring will undoubtedly create traffic problems
3. Drainage/Run Off Pollution Concerns. Heavy rains currently cause damage to our unpaved roads and ditches, which I
believe will be aggravated by the clearing of the land for this proposed facility.
4. Light/Noise/Air Pollution. We currently almost have a dark sky in Aguila and our airpark area.. Night events in the
equestrian faciltiy will definitely detract from this quality of life. .
5. Health Concerns due to animal waste
6. Police Public Safety Concerns. There is no full time police presence in Aguila
Regards,
James Newsum
47832 North 516th Ave
Aguila, AZ 85320
ph# 623-755-7841
1
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
From:
Missy Hunter <mjoyhmail@gmail.com>
Sent:
Wednesday, February 15, 2023 10:11 AM
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
Opposed to Gambler’s Row
Paola Jaramillo, PND,
I lived in the Aguila where the Gambler’s Row is being proposed.
I am opposed to the location in such a small community. There is not the resources nor infrastructure for such a project .
For one, we are all on water supply only by wells . The amount of necessity could drain the local water supply .
2) The water supply and soil could become contaminated by such a concentration of animals and people . 3) The project
is adjacent to two air parks. With a concentration of people and animals , there could be complaints of air traffic and
the attempts to decrease or possibly , the end of all traffic.
4) With the increase of people, animals and the waste , the environment with have a significant increase of fumes, files
and pollution.
It is a poor location for such a huge development. There is not the infrastructure to accommodate such an endeavor and
will cause local strain and drop of land value. It will increase local pollution and contamination. It will significantly
decrease the water supply for this small but well established community.
Please consider the difficulty that is is being proposed for the small and isolated community.
Thank you.
Melissa Hunter
48013 N 508th Ave
Aguila, AZ 85320
mjoyhmail@gmail.com
1
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
From:
Janet & Jim <jrmimlet@gmail.com>
Sent:
Wednesday, January 18, 2023 6:34 AM
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
Z-2022171
Hi Paola:
My husband and I live close to the parcel of land that is the subject of this special use permit application for an equine
facility. We live in the private- fully paved airpark that borders on Pete Rd to the northeast of that parcel. We have lived
here for 27 years and have always enjoyed the dark skies and quiet of this corner of Maricopa County. In fact the main
reason we moved here was for astronomy, both as a hobby and as a business.
We fear the dark skies and quiet will be encroached upon by an adjacent equine facility initially comprising 1 indoor
arena, 2 outdoor arenas and an RV park. We also fear a big increase in traffic on Eagle Eye Rd including the small town of
Aguila. The prevailing wind is from the southwest so whatever dust is kicked up by these activities will be sent in our
direction. The main source of dust would be unpaved roadways and parking areas associated with daily traffic and
events.
We would like to know if there will be any restrictions in the following areas:
Dust control in outdoor arenas, roadways, and RV park
Light emanating from arenas especially at night
Noise control of loudspeakers in outdoor arenas
We would like to be notified of any upcoming meetings, decisions and anything else relating to this application. If there
is an email list we can join to be kept abreast of activity on this application, please add our address below.
Thank you for your consideration of our concerns.
Janet & Jim Riffle
50840 W. Pete Rd.
PO Box 699
Aguila, AZ 85320
928-685-2261
jrmimlet@gmail.com
Sent from Mail for Windows
1
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
From:
Gary Standhart <shortfielder83@gmail.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, January 17, 2023 2:10 PM
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
Re: Case Z2022
Hi Paola
My first concerns are depleting our water resources in the area, Wenden is our neighbors to the west and the are
already starting to have issues.
Then much more traffic with increasing danger to the elderly and younger folks walking along the road,
Then the idea that they are putting an equestrian facility right next to two active Airparts which is a well known conflict
of interest followed by occupants complaining about airplane noise and wanting to bring suit against Airparts and
pilots. And they will be right in line with the approach/departure end of an active runway
Dust from additional traffic
Noise from increased populations use of OHV/Dirt bikes etc
Light pollution from occupants, arenas, commercial businesses
Crazy to me that they would see a need to put an equestrian facility right next to two active flying communities when
there is so much vacant land in the areas where they could put this with no adverse effect to anyone else.
Thanks. Gary Standhart
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:40 AM Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND) <Paola.Jaramillo@maricopa.gov> wrote:
Good Morning Gary,
Thank you for providing your feedback. Per our phone conversation earlier, I have included you in the mailing list to
receive the hearing notice once the hearings have been scheduled for this Special Use Permit. Can you please be more
specific to what your concerns are in regards to this case?
Currently the request is in the 2nd review process. You may access the applicable request documents online
through Permit Manager at: https://accela.maricopa.gov/CitizenAccessMCOSS/Default.aspx.
Under Planning Services select ‘Search Applications’
Enter the case number “Z2022171” and click enter
1
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
From:
Daniel Mertesdorf <dmertsy@gmail.com>
Sent:
Thursday, September 21, 2023 8:34 AM
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
Case Z2022171 - Opposition to the Request
Dear Paola Jaramillo,
I am writing to oppose the equestrian event facility list in case Z2022171. I am a homeowner in Samplys Airpark in Aguila
(Assessor Parcel Number 506-06-050E) so this facility will affect me in several ways. Right now the area is peaceful.
That’s one of the reasons I purchased this home. If the event facility comes to the area, it will no longer be peaceful
here. Horses, vehicles, events, RV generators and numerous people will cause noise on a regular basis.
Right now the air is clean. Another benefit of living away from a busy town/area. With an equestrian event facility right
next door we will be affected by the smell of the horse manure, vehicles driving to and from the facility, dust, hay, straw
and a very large fly infestation to go along with that, I would imagine.
This is an airport. Planes will be taking off and landing over the event facility. That doesn’t seem like a good mix to me.
Right now this area is serene and having an event facility of any kind takes that away. That affects my life on a daily basis
and defeats the whole purpose of owning a home here.
Thank you,
Dan and Trish Mertesdorf
51708 West Donald Rd
Aguila Az, 85320
Assessor Parcel Number: 506-06-050E
Phone: 218-428-8223
1
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
From:
Tammy Paynter <TammyPaynter@azfamilytothehomeless.com>
Sent:
Monday, September 4, 2023 11:21 AM
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND); PND PZAppeal
Subject:
Case #Z2022171 Protest Letter by Flip's Double Eagle LLC
Attachments:
Scan_20230901.pdf
Follow Up Flag:
Follow up
Flag Status:
Flagged
Regarding Property owned within 300 feet of the proposed Special Use Permit Application #Z2022171 for an
equestrian event facility with an RV Park in Rural-43 zoning district. As listed in the attached postcard we
received from the Maricopa Planning & Zoning Commission. Site Location approximately 500' west of the SWC
of Pete Road and Eagle Eye Road in the Aguila Area.
Flip's Double Eagle LLC, hereby Protest the proposed project that is within 300 feet of our property located at:
N 515 Ave - 5-acre parcel #506-06-066A, legal description: W2 N2 S2 SW4 NW4 Sec 26 EX W 43F RD.
Our protest concerns are as follows:
1. The Project will affect our ability to sell the above-mentioned property for the full market price for a
number of reasons which are listed below.
2. The project will bring additional dust, traffic and noise into the area.
3. Increased traffic has the potential to increase danger to the pedestrians as well as the Air traffic in this
area.
4. The project puts an additional strain on our water resources for our community in the Air Park as well
as our Wenden neighbors to the west who are already seeing the strain on their water systems. There
are many farms in the area that rely on the water that Wenden supplies.
5. The equestrian facility right next to the active Air Park would put the equestrian facility right in line
with the approach/departure end of an active FAA approved runway. The noise from the Aircraft
could spook the livestock bring suit against the Air Park, it's residence and pilots.
6. Light and noise pollution from the equestrian project, its occupants, arenas and commercial businesses
will disrupt the flying lifestyle as well as the peace and quiet of the desert area that our Air Park
currently enjoys.
7. Increased noise from ATV's and event loudspeakers during the day and evening from this development
will also disrupt our quality of life in the Air Park, not to mention the smell and flies that the livestock
would bring into our community.
Please accept this email as our registered complaint and protest of the equestrian project #Z2022171, we
request that the Planning & Zoning Commission decline the permit also known as Gamblers Row.
Thank you for your time and consideration. I will also mail a copy of this email to the address listed on the
postcard that we received.
Sincerely,
1
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
From:
peavyhorses55 <peavyhorses55@gmail.com>
Sent:
Monday, April 3, 2023 9:35 AM
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
Protest of proposed project
Case #Z2022171
We live 1/2 mile downhill from proposed project. We fill there are too many unanswered questions. They have not
addressed some major problems such as:
Flooding
Road usage
Water
Etc.
We fill this will be a big mistake allowing something of this size into this small rural community.
Steve and Celia Boyd
51520 Donald road
P.o. box 334
Aguila, Arizona 85320
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
1
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
From:
Sabrina Symns <sabrina.symns@gmail.com>
Sent:
Saturday, February 25, 2023 12:04 PM
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
Case Number Z2022171 Gambler's Row Equine and RV Park
-Hello,
I would like to be informed about any public hearings or other information available to the public regarding the
Gambler's Row Equine and RV Park proposed project, case number Z2022171.
I have a home in Eagle Roost Air Park just adjacent to this proposed facility. I have several concerns about this project,
especially excessive noise from announcers, lights that restrict night sky viewing, dust and odors from livestock along
with possible soil and water pollution. I also believe that such a large facility with people and animals directly in the
flight path for the airport is irresponsible if not dangerous.
-My contact information is Sabrina Symns, cell 307-329-9108, email, sabrina.symns@gmail.com. My address is 50836 W
William Drive, Aguila AZ 85320.
Thank you for your time.
Sabrina Symns
1
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
From:
Gary Standhart <shortfielder83@gmail.com>
Sent:
Wednesday, February 22, 2023 7:36 PM
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
Re: Case Z2022
Hi Paola
Gary Standhart here. I suppose I am not telling you anything new, but still wanted to share my thoughts/concerns, and
disappointment that a development like this could be allowed in this area with you, about this development going in
south of my home at 51728 West Pete Rd. Aguila, Az.
I moved here 5 years ago from Durango Colo. I know up there the county was very concerned about conformity. I
don't know if that applies to Maricopa County or not, but this doesn't seem to be a conforming venture. It's not
agricultural, which most of the property in the area is. It is mostly commercial, which definitely isn't conforming to this
rural setting, and the lots for the residential part of this venture are 2.5 acres each where most of the lots in the area are
5 acres or more. Also, I would imagine that this will just be phase one, and if allowed to continue, will just worsen the
impact on this area.
And, another thing that REALLY bothers me is that this development is brought to this area by someone not from this
area, for, in the most part, people not from this area, that are seasonal visitors for most part, against the will of many in
this area, disrupting the lives/comforts/safety of people who are residents of this area, in many instances, for years and
year round, who moved here for the affordability and peace and quiet that the area, up until recently offered.
Another issue that doesn't seem to have had the appropriate attention is the fact they are putting in some water
retention areas that will be dual purpose for storing livestock with accumulating body waste from these animal, feces
and urine(knowing that some will be removed, but certainly not all), and when these areas overflow from seasonal rains,
which we know they will, much of this waste will flow downhill into neighboring yards and vegetation along. I feel there
are much better places for a development like this to go with all the vacant land around where they could go without a
negative impact to anyone.
Thanks for considering those that have been living here and enjoying this part of Maricopa County.
Gary Standhart
970.749.1844
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:40 AM Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND) <Paola.Jaramillo@maricopa.gov> wrote:
Good Morning Gary,
Thank you for providing your feedback. Per our phone conversation earlier, I have included you in the mailing list to
receive the hearing notice once the hearings have been scheduled for this Special Use Permit. Can you please be more
specific to what your concerns are in regards to this case?
Currently the request is in the 2nd review process. You may access the applicable request documents online
through Permit Manager at: https://accela.maricopa.gov/CitizenAccessMCOSS/Default.aspx.
Under Planning Services select ‘Search Applications’
1
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
From:
S. Christie <slchristie@yahoo.com>
Sent:
Monday, February 20, 2023 3:30 PM
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
Z2022171
I am opposed to this proposed project. I have read everything that has been
submitted to the County regarding this project and never once does it
mention that there are two private, FAA-approved airparks right "next
door" to this proposed project. This type of facility does not fit in with the
surrounding area. Flight patterns go directly over the proposed facility at
low levels due to how close it is to our take off and landing strips.
I have great concern over the water. We struggle with water as it is right
now and adding that much more to our water table will definitely put a
burden on it. Just up the street a ways in Wenden, there is a water crisis
going on. When you add up all the water needed for dust control, watering
livestock, which they plan to house 830+, the RV park, vendors and
bathrooms for the roping events, and the future homes, this is really going
to be a strain. I'm sure the daily water usage will be over 100,000 gallons!
I have concern about the smell. I don't care how much someone tries to tell
me there will be no smell, I know better. There is no way to mask that
smell. I worry about the nitrites in the urine getting into the water table.
This can be very hazardous. I've been told that all the waste will be
removed every day there is an event and loaded into dumpsters. I doubt
these dumpsters are covered. There WILL be flies. Lots and lots of flies.
Then I wonder about the days there aren't any events. The waste will not
be removed and if there are 830+ housed livestock, that's a lot of waste.
One main source for nitrates in water is animal feedlots. Although this
place is a roping arena, it will contain as much livestock as a feedlot and
should be treated as such.
2
In a September 2022 letter from Maricopa County Environmental Services
indicates that they have concerns and says they must receive ATC (well
site water distribution lines, water storage tank, booster pump station)
information. They also state that the number of horse stalls is a lot and
question what the water situation is for the horses.
The traffic report is flawed -- like really flawed. This was done near the
end of May. Many residents in this area are snowbirds and are usually
gone by May. But this area is full to the brim in what is proposed to be the
busiest months of roping. The report is also flawed in that the speed limit
is not accurate. Not too far down Eagle Eye Road the speed limit turns to
40 mph and before reaching the entrances to Eagle Roost Airpark and
Samply Airpark, it is 50 mph. Traffic report should also include vendors,
hay trucks, cattle trucks, along with the normal rigs and spectators.
The Narrative Report for Gamblers Row indicates that the largest event is
expected to consist of 1,050 teams. A team consists of two people which
means 2,100 just as participants. Now most of them do not travel together.
They each bring their own truck pulling their own horse trailer. The
parking doesn't even come close to being sufficient.
Light pollution. Most of us in this community love our night skies. The
star gazing is amazing and this will be totally ruined by arena lights. They
say they are going to point them down, but their elevation is higher than
both of our airparks and so that will will be right at our eye level. It will be
a really big impact, as well as the noise. There will be much noise from
the events, including a PA system for the announcer.
Other impacts for Aguila, not just our airparks, will be the increased
traffic, increased use of our almost nonexistent facilities (this town has one
cafe and one gas station. There is a small mom and pop type grocery store
and a Family Dollar. The added housing this project plans to put in cannot
not be sustained by our current post office. All the boxes are spoken for
(there is not mail delivery here, you have to have a p.o. box). The lack of
3
amenities in our small community will put a burden on Wickenburg for
sure.
I'm not the best one to describe my thoughts in words, but I hope this
gives you some food for thought. I know these people have deep pockets
and, unfortunately, I realize those kinds of people get what they want. But
you must take a look at our community. Someone from the County should
come out here and physically take a look. For so many, many reasons this
project is not fitted for this community whatsoever.
Thank you for your time,
Sincerely,
Sheryl Christie
51112 W. Iver Rd.
Eagle Roost Airpark
Aguila, AZ 85320
(P.O. Box 186, Aguila, AZ 85320)
(928) 671-2550
1
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
From:
S. Christie <slchristie@yahoo.com>
Sent:
Monday, February 20, 2023 3:34 PM
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
Z2022171
I forgot to also mention in my previous email to you sent just a minute
about, but police and fire is also a big concern. If we have a medical
emergency or a fire emergency, we are told to call the fire station directly
as it can cause a huge delay by calling 911. We are a total volunteer fire
station. As for police, we are serviced by Maricopa County Sheriff's
Department. Being the furthest most part of the county, it can up to an
hour before we get a response from police. It's just how it is in such a rural
place. I think that should also be considered.
Sincerely,
Sheryl Christie
1
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
From:
James Newsum <jdnewsum@gmail.com>
Sent:
Wednesday, February 15, 2023 4:03 PM
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
"Gamblers Row" proposed horse equestrian project in Aguila AZ
Hello Paola,
I am a homeowner in Aguila Arizona located in the Valley of the Eagle Airpark (Sampley's Airport), I have recently
become aware of the proposed project to construct an equestrian facility south of and directly next to the airpark. I am
in opposition to this large and intrusive project for the following reasons;
1.. Aviation Concerns from low flying aircraft flying to/from Sampleys Airport
2. Increased Traffic Problems. There are no traffic control devices such as stop lights etc. in Aguila and the heavy
truck/trailer and auto traffic that this facility will bring will undoubtedly create traffic problems
3. Drainage/Run Off Pollution Concerns. Heavy rains currently cause damage to our unpaved roads and ditches, which I
believe will be aggravated by the clearing of the land for this proposed facility.
4. Light/Noise/Air Pollution. We currently almost have a dark sky in Aguila and our airpark area.. Night events in the
equestrian faciltiy will definitely detract from this quality of life. .
5. Health Concerns due to animal waste
6. Police Public Safety Concerns. There is no full time police presence in Aguila
Regards,
James Newsum
47832 North 516th Ave
Aguila, AZ 85320
ph# 623-755-7841
1
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
From:
Missy Hunter <mjoyhmail@gmail.com>
Sent:
Wednesday, February 15, 2023 10:11 AM
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
Opposed to Gambler’s Row
Paola Jaramillo, PND,
I lived in the Aguila where the Gambler’s Row is being proposed.
I am opposed to the location in such a small community. There is not the resources nor infrastructure for such a project .
For one, we are all on water supply only by wells . The amount of necessity could drain the local water supply .
2) The water supply and soil could become contaminated by such a concentration of animals and people . 3) The project
is adjacent to two air parks. With a concentration of people and animals , there could be complaints of air traffic and
the attempts to decrease or possibly , the end of all traffic.
4) With the increase of people, animals and the waste , the environment with have a significant increase of fumes, files
and pollution.
It is a poor location for such a huge development. There is not the infrastructure to accommodate such an endeavor and
will cause local strain and drop of land value. It will increase local pollution and contamination. It will significantly
decrease the water supply for this small but well established community.
Please consider the difficulty that is is being proposed for the small and isolated community.
Thank you.
Melissa Hunter
48013 N 508th Ave
Aguila, AZ 85320
mjoyhmail@gmail.com
1
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
From:
Janet & Jim <jrmimlet@gmail.com>
Sent:
Wednesday, January 18, 2023 6:34 AM
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
Z-2022171
Hi Paola:
My husband and I live close to the parcel of land that is the subject of this special use permit application for an equine
facility. We live in the private- fully paved airpark that borders on Pete Rd to the northeast of that parcel. We have lived
here for 27 years and have always enjoyed the dark skies and quiet of this corner of Maricopa County. In fact the main
reason we moved here was for astronomy, both as a hobby and as a business.
We fear the dark skies and quiet will be encroached upon by an adjacent equine facility initially comprising 1 indoor
arena, 2 outdoor arenas and an RV park. We also fear a big increase in traffic on Eagle Eye Rd including the small town of
Aguila. The prevailing wind is from the southwest so whatever dust is kicked up by these activities will be sent in our
direction. The main source of dust would be unpaved roadways and parking areas associated with daily traffic and
events.
We would like to know if there will be any restrictions in the following areas:
Dust control in outdoor arenas, roadways, and RV park
Light emanating from arenas especially at night
Noise control of loudspeakers in outdoor arenas
We would like to be notified of any upcoming meetings, decisions and anything else relating to this application. If there
is an email list we can join to be kept abreast of activity on this application, please add our address below.
Thank you for your consideration of our concerns.
Janet & Jim Riffle
50840 W. Pete Rd.
PO Box 699
Aguila, AZ 85320
928-685-2261
jrmimlet@gmail.com
Sent from Mail for Windows
February 7, 2023
To: Paola Jaramillo
Maricopa County Planning and Development
301 W. Jefferson St., #170
Phoenix, AZ 85003
From: Patrick & Jean Good
PO Box 325
52010 W. Pete Rd.
Aguila AZ 85320
Case Number Z2022171 Gambler’s Row Equine Facility and RV Park
Being a property owner of APN 506-06-127 in very close proximity to the proposed Gambler’s
Row Gambler’s Row Equine Facility and RV Park. I have multiple concerns as to its effects on
us and the whole of Aguila.
1) Water pressure: There are existing issues with the water pressure. Aguila Water Services
are having trouble keeping up with demand now. The proposed addition of 4” pipe on
Pete Road and the addition of a storage tank and pressure pump that will be feeding
Gambler’s Row (Narrative Report for Ben Jordan Acres Revised Jan. 23, 2023 sec. 14.1
& 14.2) will decrease the water pressure feeding this tank & pump, and more so when an
event is underway.
2) Fire Department: Being a small community Aguila has a volunteer fire dept. Though they
are fully trained they don’t have the equipment or the experience in handling a large fire
which would be possible at the Gambler’s Row facility.
3) Traffic: Traffic on Eagle Eye rd. leading up to and following an event will be very heavy.
For those of us that Eagle Eye rd. is our only egress to do our daily travels it will be a
nightmare getting onto Eagle Eye road. The hay & cattle trucks are proposed to enter the
facility at 519th Ave. off Pete road. Pete road is an unmaintained dirt road If they do pave
this road who will be maintaining it?
4) Noise: From the meeting Feb. 2 at the Aguila Fire Dept. we were informed that when the
events are finished for the day is when they will stop. If the event runs late into the night,
the Arena’s PA and rigs leaving the event will be creating an excessive amount of noise
with no regard to the homes where people are attempting to sleep to get their rest for the
next day’s work. Requiring a minimal starting and maximum ending time would help
5) Light: The light generated by the project by not only the arenas but the RV park will
pollute the night skies and be a constant irritation to those that have southern facing
homes. Arena lights pointing away from town and directed downward. Possibly lower
intensity lights in RV and parking areas may help some.
6) Drainage: The proposed reservoirs for containing the runoff and rain will change the
natural flow of water. During Monsoon season the water is intense in its flow, the
reservoirs can be overflowed and the water will take its own path downhill. In turn it can
over power culverts placed on Pete rd. causing damage to existing property and making
Pete rd. unpassable to Eagle Eye rd.
7) Livestock: There will be a large amount of cattle being penned up for days, and horses
either staying at the facility or being transported in for the event. Even with the proposed
cleanup won’t be able to completely get rid of the obnoxious odor and runoff into the
reservoirs during heavy rain.
8) Pollution: The arenas, the commercial establishments, the RV park & the temporary
parking areas will generate trash that is proposed to be picked up by local trash service.
The trash that is left behind from people not disposing trash in the proper containers will
flow or blow into Aguila.
9) Dust: With the arenas, interior roads and parking areas not being paved there will be an
increase in dust that will affect the surrounding homes.
10) Air traffic: There are (2) airparks with runways in close proximity. One of which is in
direct line of flight from the south (Sampley’s airport). This is a concern, the planes
arriving and departing from this runway can be flying low to the ground and in case of an
emergency have to divert course to avoid Gambler’s Row.
The proposed Gambler’s Row site is not a good place to be built. It will have a negative impact
on the entire Aguila community. Had it been cited for an area East or West of Aguila where the
open fields of the local farms were located the impact on property and residents would be much
smaller.
Sincerely,
Patrick & Jean Good
________________________
_________________________
PO Box 325
52010 W. Pete rd.
Aguila AZ 85320
H:928-685-4047
C:623-695-8577
peegood55@yahoo.com
parcel # 506-06-127
February 18, 2023
To:
Paola Jaramillo, PND
(602)-506-8150
Maricopa County Planning and Development
301 W. Jefferson St., #170
Phoenix, AZ 85003
RE:
Protest of Proposed Project – Case Number Z2022171
Gambler’s Row Equine Facility and RV Park
As property owners less than 3,000 feet from the above proposed project, we strongly oppose this project.
The submitted reports for “Gambler’s Row” made NO mention of the over 110 homes directly
downhill and downwind within less than 3,000 feet of this project, in the form of TWO well
established Residential Flight Parks with FAA Approved Runways.
Gambler’s Way would be right on final approach to Samply Airport - directly south of and less than 2,800
feet from the end of the runway. Aircraft departing to the south would fly very low over the project, at full
power, possibly spooking horses and resulting in injury to horses or riders. Eagle Roost Airport is less than
3,000 feet to the East, and traffic from that airport will likely pass overhead the proposed project as well.
We also have other concerns – from errors and omissions in the reports given to the county to substantial
health and safety concerns.
The Traffic Report is flawed. It was done on May 21st – when virtually all our winter residents are gone. In
addition, the traffic increase estimates will be much higher than those used, due to the incredible growth of
our area due its popularity with horse owners. MUCH higher than 5 years ago and increasing at a much
higher rate than suggested in the report.
The stated speed limit to the project was 35 mph. This is wrong. It is at least 50 mph for at least 1/2 mile
before the project. The amount of truck traffic traveling at higher speeds past our neighborhoods will make
it virtually impossible for residents to safely enter the highway from their homes.
The calculation for number of vehicles and parking requirements is flawed and underestimated. Comparing
traffic at roping events with traffic at concerts is inaccurate. Small cars or SUV’s do not create the chaos
that we already see in our area caused by large numbers of trucks with horse trailers.
The Narrative Report states that the project will see seasonal usage. They also they told the public at the
meeting held at the Aguila Fire Station that the park would only be used from October thru March – when,
in fact, it will be open all year long. They also told the public that they had never had a roping arena before
– when in fact they already own one in Utah – Ben Jordan Arena.
When asked about noise pollution from crowds and loudspeakers, they said “that’s not going to happen.”
When asked about dust issues, they also said “that’s not going to happen.” When asked about light
pollution, they said, “That’s not going to happen.” It says in the report that exterior lighting will face away
from residential areas, but on the plan, it shows lighting facing North – directly towards existing family
homes. All the lighting in such a project will create light pollution in our area, ruining the now dark skies
we have currently.
It was stated that there will be up to 820 head of horses and cattle housed at the facility. This doesn’t even
include all the transient animals! Why aren’t there any requirements for compliance with CAFO feed lots?
It falls well within the definition of a CAFO as per Arizona Department of Environmental Services: 500
head of horses housed at least 45 days in a confined area requiring feed to be brought in for the animals. It
will also create issues such as attracting flies and rodents to the area, and noxious odors from so many
animals present in a confined area.
They also made no mention of the fact that they are using the water retention drainage ponds for
cattle pens. We have great concerns that when water overflows these ponds, it will flow right downhill to
all our homes, creating possible health and safety issues. Regulations state that you can’t put dry wells or
drainage ditches downhill of the manure, yet they are talking of doing just that with dry wells.
They omitted all data of exactly HOW MUCH manure the facility’s animals will generate. Over 35,000
lbs. of waste PER DAY. Even if they pick up manure daily, there will still be much manure and urine on
the ground at any given time. You can’t pick up urine, so when it rains, it will go into the ground and flow
downhill, onto our land and possibly into our ground water, which is where we all get our drinking water.
This run-off will contain contaminants such as metals, pharmaceuticals, nitrates, and bacteria, especially
harmful to the elderly – which include virtually ALL our flight park homeowners!
We also have HUGE concerns about water usage. With the water crisis the state is facing – how can the
obscene amount of over 30,000 gallons of water a day just for dust control be justified? Not to mention the
amount the animals will require - over 8,000 gallons per day. This will come directly from the aquifer that
furnishes our drinking water and our farms food production.
The dust coming off the roping arenas and animal pens can’t be contained either, and when moving
downwind – will blow directly into our neighborhoods. Maricopa County Air Quality Department states
that there can be no visible dust emissions crossing property lines. We already have dust problems from all
the current residential roping arenas, let alone this huge commercial facility.
We are concerned about public safety resulting from the addition of this many transient people to the area.
This influx of people creates increased inherent types of problems. We are in an unincorporated area at the
very end of Maricopa County with no local police protection whatsoever. We already suffer from up to a
60-minute response time from Maricopa County Sherrif’s department – a department experiencing an 80
deputy shortage at this time.
We feel that this project poses a serious threat to the public health, safety, and welfare of our surrounding
community if it were allowed to proceed.
We also feel that the landowner and their representatives intentionally supplied inaccurate information and
made material misrepresentations that would make a difference to the approval of this special use permit.
We are not opposed to growth, but it should be compatible with existing surroundings. A large commercial
enterprise such as Gambler’s Row does not fit with our surrounding properties and intended uses.
Therefore, we are opposed to the construction of this facility.
Sincerely,
F. Leland and Carolyn Jones
51852 W Pete Road
Aguila, AZ 85320
(907)350-2782
From:
Gene Wilson
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
Z2022171 special use permit
Date:
Wednesday, September 6, 2023 8:17:27 PM
Please be advised that we are opposed to this development for the following reasons.
This development is a commercial enterprise to be built in a very rural, low density, homes only area. It is not
compatible with the lifestyle of the land owners who have invested their lives and savings to live in a peaceful, non
commercial environment away from congested traffic and noise a commercial enterprise will intrude upon.
There is no evidence that this commercial enterprise is supported by Maricopa County General Plan for the area
intended.
The traffic hazard this development promises to cause is guaranteed to be incompatible with all the driveways and
easements the locals use for ingress/egress to their properties.
Eagle Eye Road has a speed limit of 35 mph from highway 60 south for several miles past the proposed
development. Heavy trucks can be witnessed on a minute by minute basis exceeding the limit by 30 to 40 miles per
hour in either direction. They use Eagle Eye road as a cutoff between I-10 and highway 60. Without extensive
investment in turning lanes and traffic signals there will be fatalities on a regular basis if this development is
allowed to be built.
There should not be any commercial development allowed unless a 100 year water supply can be guaranteed and
there is no harm to the existing aquifer. A mixed use residential / commercial enterprise should not be exempt from
this long standing requirement for residential development.
Any high density residential development should be required to have their own water treatment plant for sewage.
The volume of manure and urine from this development will significantly impact the ground water and the
subsequent runoff to surrounding wells since the proposed land is significantly elevated above the residential
community. This is totally unacceptable for the homeowners to cope with in the very near future.
My neighbors and I have no knowledge of how the developer plans to mitigate the effluents that will be generated
next to our properties.
From the biohazard of manure and urine to the smell of hundreds of horses and cattle, there is no plan to mitigate the
intrusion into our lifestyle.
Sincerely, Hershel E. Wilson
506-06-086B
Manager
GNT HOLDINGS LLC
February 7, 2023
To: Paola Jaramillo
Maricopa County Planning and Development
301 W. Jefferson St., #170
Phoenix, AZ 85003
From: Patrick & Jean Good
PO Box 325
52010 W. Pete Rd.
Aguila AZ 85320
Case Number Z2022171 Gambler’s Row Equine Facility and RV Park
Being a property owner of APN 506-06-127 in very close proximity to the proposed Gambler’s
Row Gambler’s Row Equine Facility and RV Park. I have multiple concerns as to its effects on
us and the whole of Aguila.
1) Water pressure: There are existing issues with the water pressure. Aguila Water Services
are having trouble keeping up with demand now. The proposed addition of 4” pipe on
Pete Road and the addition of a storage tank and pressure pump that will be feeding
Gambler’s Row (Narrative Report for Ben Jordan Acres Revised Jan. 23, 2023 sec. 14.1
& 14.2) will decrease the water pressure feeding this tank & pump, and more so when an
event is underway.
2) Fire Department: Being a small community Aguila has a volunteer fire dept. Though they
are fully trained they don’t have the equipment or the experience in handling a large fire
which would be possible at the Gambler’s Row facility.
3) Traffic: Traffic on Eagle Eye rd. leading up to and following an event will be very heavy.
For those of us that Eagle Eye rd. is our only egress to do our daily travels it will be a
nightmare getting onto Eagle Eye road. The hay & cattle trucks are proposed to enter the
facility at 519th Ave. off Pete road. Pete road is an unmaintained dirt road If they do pave
this road who will be maintaining it?
4) Noise: From the meeting Feb. 2 at the Aguila Fire Dept. we were informed that when the
events are finished for the day is when they will stop. If the event runs late into the night,
the Arena’s PA and rigs leaving the event will be creating an excessive amount of noise
with no regard to the homes where people are attempting to sleep to get their rest for the
next day’s work. Requiring a minimal starting and maximum ending time would help
5) Light: The light generated by the project by not only the arenas but the RV park will
pollute the night skies and be a constant irritation to those that have southern facing
homes. Arena lights pointing away from town and directed downward. Possibly lower
intensity lights in RV and parking areas may help some.
6) Drainage: The proposed reservoirs for containing the runoff and rain will change the
natural flow of water. During Monsoon season the water is intense in its flow, the
reservoirs can be overflowed and the water will take its own path downhill. In turn it can
over power culverts placed on Pete rd. causing damage to existing property and making
Pete rd. unpassable to Eagle Eye rd.
7) Livestock: There will be a large amount of cattle being penned up for days, and horses
either staying at the facility or being transported in for the event. Even with the proposed
cleanup won’t be able to completely get rid of the obnoxious odor and runoff into the
reservoirs during heavy rain.
8) Pollution: The arenas, the commercial establishments, the RV park & the temporary
parking areas will generate trash that is proposed to be picked up by local trash service.
The trash that is left behind from people not disposing trash in the proper containers will
flow or blow into Aguila.
9) Dust: With the arenas, interior roads and parking areas not being paved there will be an
increase in dust that will affect the surrounding homes.
10) Air traffic: There are (2) airparks with runways in close proximity. One of which is in
direct line of flight from the south (Sampley’s airport). This is a concern, the planes
arriving and departing from this runway can be flying low to the ground and in case of an
emergency have to divert course to avoid Gambler’s Row.
The proposed Gambler’s Row site is not a good place to be built. It will have a negative impact
on the entire Aguila community. Had it been cited for an area East or West of Aguila where the
open fields of the local farms were located the impact on property and residents would be much
smaller.
Sincerely,
Patrick & Jean Good
________________________
_________________________
PO Box 325
52010 W. Pete rd.
Aguila AZ 85320
H:928-685-4047
C:623-695-8577
peegood55@yahoo.com
parcel # 506-06-127
To: Maricopa County Planning and Development / Board of Supervisors
RE: Protest of Proposed Project – Case Number Z2022171
Gambler’s Row Equine Facility and RV Park
As a property owner less than 1/2 mile from the above proposed project, I strongly oppose this project.
This facility will generate noxious odors, a huge number of flies, dust, noise day and night, significant traffic
problems, contaminated drainage, huge demands on an already taxed water system, and light pollution (our
subdivisions are "dark sky" communities - with the Milky Way visible every night),
The narrative report for Ben Jordan Acres made NO mention of the almost 100 homes within a mile of this
project. In addition, there are TWO well established FAA Approved Airport Runways within one mile of the
project.
There are hundreds of thousands of acres along Highway 60 between Wickenburg and Wenden that are far
more suitable for this type of development, and would have little to no impact on established residential areas.
We are quite certain that none of the County Supervisors would want this facility in their back-yard.
Thank you in advance for your consideration in this matter. We are extremely hopeful that this project will
NOT be approved.
Jeremiah F. Daly ____________________________________________
Property Owner (as listed on property deed)
Assessor’s Property Tax Parcel Number: 506-06-074G
Property Address: 51347 W. William Road, Aguila AZ 85320
Mailing Address: PO Box 428, Aguila AZ 85320
1
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
From:
George Bartley <gobart007@hotmail.com>
Sent:
Monday, September 25, 2023 9:06 PM
To:
Paola Jaramillo Quintero (PND)
Subject:
case # Z2022171 Special use permit for Gambler's Row Equestrian Event Facility
Follow Up Flag:
Follow up
Flag Status:
Flagged
We are opposed to this proposed development for many reasons.
The proposed project area is a very rural, low density, and non commercial. The intrusion of such a high
impact operation would be devastating to the current and past life styles for which the area has been famous.
It has drawn residents from all over our country. It would destroy everything which caused it to be a magnet
for those wishing a quiet and peaceful home. The primitive and historic back country would be inundated by
many more vehicles, people and horses than it has ever known to the detriment of local flora and fauna.
The sheer size and density of the operation would insure noise, dust, and light pollution uncommon to this
area not just during daylight hours but long into and throughout the night. The impact, in just a few short
years, would be far greater than has been seen in well over a hundred! Imagine how such a sudden event
could undue even the best planned community never mind such a rural place as this.
The odors from such a concentration of activity would also accompany damage to the fragile aquifer from
animal waste. It would be like putting a " feed lot " into the midst of a residential area like Sun City West!
There would be unimaginable harm not only to local wells but would also place a great strain on the local
operating water company in Aguila which supplies the majority of my neighbors needs. Along with this
concern is the obvious increase in our water rates as the small, local water company must build out
infrastructure to service this project as has been proposed.
The traffic generated by so much additional use would be unmanageable without extensive road build out and
traffic control not only on Eagle Eye Road but on U.S. 60 as well. The access into and out of Aguila would be a
nightmare. Add in the heavy truck traffic and increasing use of U.S. 60 as an I-10 alternate as well as heavy
truck use of Eagle Eye Rd. as a shortcut to I-10, the result would be incredibly dangerous to all!
You must also factor in that this development is literally next to and below the low flight paths of two FAA
approved airfields. Placing so many livestock and people within yards of aircraft could be a danger to those on
the ground as well as being a hindrance to safe aircraft operations.
We also believe that our property values will be adversely effected with literally no foreseeable benefit other
than for the developer. The entire scenario offers little benefit for the Aguila community.
We're confident that after a careful review, Maricopa County will agree that this entire project fails it's citizens
in every significant way.
Sincerely,
George J. and Maureen Bartley
51211 W. William Rd. PO BOX 528
480-209-2324
APN # 506-06-071H