1. BOARD DIRECTIVE RELATED TO PUBLIC RECORDS REQUESTS Approve a motion, pursuant to A.R.S. 11-251(1), to supervise Maricopa County Elected Officials' use of public records requests made upon Maricopa County such that no Maricopa County Elected, Appointed and/or Judicial Officer, nor his/her office, may issue a public records request upon Maricopa County or its departments. All information held by any elected or appointed official of Maricopa County required by another Maricopa County Elected, Appointed and/or Judicial Officers in accordance with his/her official duties may be requested from individual departments through an "Internal Information Request" form. In the event of any dispute between any elected or appointed officials concerning access to public records, such dispute shall be presented to the County Manager or his designee for determination. The County Manager shall develop and publish a procedure for such disputes. The reason for this instruction is to conserve public resources and to avoid any prospect of litigation between County funded elected officials and departments. (C-06-09-256-M-00)

2. BOARD DIRECTIVE RELATED TO THE CREATION OF AN INTERNAL INFORMATION REQUEST FORM Approve a motion to direct the County Manager to create the Internal Information Request Form and send it with a letter to all Maricopa County Elected, Appointed and/or Judicial Officers directing them regarding the Board of Supervisors' actions taken on January 21, 2009 (C-06-09-265-M-00). (C-06-09-258-M-00)

3. APPOINTMENT OF OUTSIDE COUNSEL TO REPRESENT MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IN THE MATTER OF CV2008-033194 (THOMAS AND ARPAIO VS. MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS) Approve a motion to acknowledge that the Board of Supervisors' appointed attorneys in CV2008-033194 (Thomas and Arpaio vs. Maricopa County Board of Supervisors), Shughart, Thomson & Kilroy, PC and Mr. Thomas Irvine (collectively "STK"), were also sued in CV2008-033193 (Thomas v. STK, Irvine and Romley), that the Board has been fully informed as to these matters, has been advised to seek independent legal counsel on the question, considered if a conflict was created for STK, as such does not see any conflict with STK continuing its representation of the Board in CV2008-033194, and if such conflict does exist affirmatively waives such conflict. (C-06-09-257-M-00)