Summary
This item transmits recommendations from the Mayor and Council for appointment or
reappointment to City Boards and Commissions.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Mayor's Office.




Page 7
ATTACHMENT A




To: City Council Date: November 3, 2021
From: Mayor Kate Gallego

Subject: BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS – APPOINTEES

The purpose of this memo is to provide recommendations for appointments to the
following Boards and Commissions:

Camelback East Village Planning Committee

Councilman Sal DiCiccio recommends the following for appointment:

John Czerwinski
Mr. Czerwinski is the Managing Director of Merit Partners, Inc. and a resident of District
6. He fills a vacancy for a partial term to expire November 19, 2021.

Desert View Village Planning Committee

Councilman Jim Waring recommends the following for appointment:

Marla Neely
Ms. Neely is the Chief Financial Officer at Accredited Appliance of Arizona and a
resident of District 2. She fills a vacancy for a term to expire November 19, 2022.

Phoenix Business Workforce Development Board

I recommend the following for appointment:

Karen Hartson
Ms. Hartson is the Vice President of Human Resources at Honeywell. She fills a
vacancy in the Business IT category for a partial term to expire June 30, 2023.




Page 8



Report

Liquor License - Special Event - Hermandad del Senor de los Milagros (Mesa,
AZ)

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Sofia Vasquez Diaz

Location
10626 N. 43rd Ave.
Council District: 1

Function
Cultural Celebration

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Nov. 26, 2021 - 7 p.m. to 1:30 a.m. / 250 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 9



Report

Liquor License - Angry Crab Shack

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 161889.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
3227 E. Bell Road, Ste. D110
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 2

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Nov. 21, 2021.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations


Page 10

on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Angry Crab Shack (Series 12)
11340 W. Bell Road, Ste. 118A, Surprise
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Angry Crab Shack & BBQ (Series 12)
1365 W. Grant Road, Tucson
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am a Franchise owner of two other Angry Crab Shacks. I will continue to ensure my
employees abide by Title 4 Arizona Liquor law.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We would like to offer our patrons a place to sit down relax and enjoy some amazing
food.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Angry Crab Shack
Liquor License Map - Angry Crab Shack

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.


Page 11
Liquor License Data: ANGRY CRAB SHACK
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 2 2

Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0

Liquor Store 9 6 4

Beer and Wine Store 10 6 2

Restaurant 12 12 5


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 46.78 65.47 88.95

Violent Crimes 8.73 15.07 16.98

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 56 85

Total Violations 92 165




Page 12
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1033032 1103 78 % 9% 18 %

1033033 1037 75 % 23 % 0%

1033041 1926 47 % 13 % 34 %

1033042 1219 2% 16 % 38 %

1033043 1952 26 % 28 % 48 %

1033052 2333 59 % 9% 30 %

6195003 2362 65 % 14 % 8%

6196001 2094 72 % 11 % 3%

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 13
Liquor License Map: ANGRY CRAB SHACK
3227 E BELL RD




Ü
Date: 9/23/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 14



Report

Liquor License - Butters Pancakes & Cafe

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 161029.

Summary

Applicant
Christopher Syregelas, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
7000 E. Mayo Blvd., Ste. 1032
Zoning Classification: PUD PCD
Council District: 2

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Nov. 14, 2021.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations


Page 15

on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Butters Pancakes & Cafe (Series 12)
8300 N. Hayden Road, Ste. F104, Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Butters Pancakes & Cafe (Series 12)
14795 N. Northsight Blvd., Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We have over 40 years experience owning an operating restaurants and currently
have two other Butters Pancakes & Cafe restaurants in Scottsdale with liquor licenses.
Our staff has been through state certified liquor training and are knowledgeable in
responsible liquor service.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Butters is Arizona's best breakfast and lunch cafe. We know that it takes fresh,
innovative food served consistently and with unsurpassed quality by dedicated team
members in a clean and warm environment. We also believe in being responsible
shepherds of the environment by limiting our carbon footprint and whenever possible,
we seek out organically grown ingredients from local farmers an producers. We
believe in giving back to the community and are excited to open our first Phoenix
location.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.



Page 16

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Butters Pancakes & Cafe
Liquor License Map - Butters Pancakes & Cafe

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 17
Liquor License Data: BUTTERS PANCAKES & CAFE
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 3 3

Liquor Store 9 1 1

Restaurant 12 14 13


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 46.78 13.19 22.71

Violent Crimes 8.73 1.24 1.48
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 56 0

Total Violations 91


Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

2168442 1681 50 % 43 % 4%

2168452 694 23 % 38 % 8%

6152001 1993 8% 29 % 12 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 18
Liquor License Map: BUTTERS PANCAKES & CAFE
7000 E MAYO BLVD




Ü
Date: 9/15/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 19



Report

Liquor License - Tacos Calafia

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 160974.

Summary

Applicant
Perla Del Rio, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
1606 E. Bell Road, Ste. 101-104
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 3

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This location requires a
Use Permit to allow outdoor dining and outdoor alcohol consumption.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Nov. 15, 2021.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Page 20




Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We believe that we can sell alcohol responsibly and ensure that consuption of
alcoholic drinks remains within safe parameters. We understand that there are risks
with not taking the sell of liquor responsibly could be dangerous and harm someone.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We understand and are willing to respect and serve our community by providing a
safe space for our customers, if we saw a risk to the neighbors that live in our area, we
would not pursue this license.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Tacos Calafia
Liquor License Map - Tacos Calafia

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 21
Liquor License Data: TACOS CALAFIA
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 2 0

Beer and Wine Bar 7 3 2

Liquor Store 9 2 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 5 2

Restaurant 12 9 3


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 46.78 80.36 99.68

Violent Crimes 8.73 10.96 13.48

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 56 54

Total Violations 92 99




Page 22
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1036062 854 90 % 13 % 4%

1036063 2174 78 % 13 % 25 %

1036111 1396 66 % 14 % 3%

6190002 1340 91 % 0% 9%

6192001 1053 20 % 23 % 17 %

6192003 2370 48 % 17 % 12 %

6193001 1220 87 % 12 % 14 %

6194001 1068 54 % 32 % 9%

6194002 1484 18 % 18 % 8%

6194003 1151 79 % 9% 31 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 23
Liquor License Map: TACOS CALAFIA
1606 E BELL RD




Ü
Date: 9/17/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 24



Report

Liquor License - In & Out Convenience

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 009070006684.

Summary

Applicant
Nirav Patel, Agent

License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store

Location
6024 N. 23rd Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 5

This request is for an ownership transfer of a liquor license for a liquor store. This
location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an
interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Nov. 14, 2021.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the


Page 25

State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Heena Mini Mart (Series 9)
2202 E. Route 66, Flagstaff
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Shell Cave Creek (Series 10)
31414 N. Cave Creek Road, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 4
Liquor license violations: None

Herbal Nail & Spa (Series 7)
6590 N. Scottsdale Road, #150, Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Pebblestone Market (Series 9)
3399 N. Scottsdale Road, Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am currently an operator of 2 store with liquor license for past 17 years and I have
not had and issues or any type of denial. I operate all my store to the best of my
capability and with capable employees.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“The location will continue to provide a convenient location to purchase liquor for the


Page 26

people in the neighbhour hood with easy access. The location is also very easily
accessible off Bethany Home Road and it is right on 23rd Ave.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - In & Out Convenience
Liquor License Map - In & Out Convenience

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 27
Liquor License Data: IN & OUT CONVENIENCE
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 4 3

Liquor Store 9 7 3

Beer and Wine Store 10 13 5

Hotel 11 1 0

Restaurant 12 7 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 48.11 275.21 218.89

Violent Crimes 9.06 52.78 70.06

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 57 214

Total Violations 95 373




Page 28
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1068012 1670 5% 28 % 55 %

1068013 1083 30 % 20 % 33 %

1068021 1099 60 % 0% 9%

1068022 1105 85 % 21 % 1%

1068023 1633 17 % 17 % 34 %

1069002 2629 71 % 5% 22 %

1072022 2085 62 % 5% 22 %

1073001 2203 79 % 3% 6%

1073004 2614 23 % 5% 31 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 29
Liquor License Map: IN & OUT CONVENIENCE
6024 N 23RD AVE




Ü
Date: 9/17/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 30



Report

Liquor License - IHOP

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 1207B294.

Summary

Applicant
Thomas Aguilera, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
1743 E. Camelback Road
Zoning Classification: PSC
Council District: 6

This request is for an acquisition of control of an existing liquor license for a restaurant.
This location is currently licensed for liquor sales.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Nov. 8, 2021.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

IHOP (Series 12)
705 S. Rural Road, #101, Tempe
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix


Page 31

Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I serve as agent on numerous liquor licenses in Arizona. I have been fingerprinted and
background checked. I have Title IV expertise and have practiced liquor law for over
20 years in Arizona I have completed all paperwork for this AOC and submitted same
to the Arizona Deptartment of Liquor License and Control.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 32



Report

Liquor License - Anhelo

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 161426.

Summary

Applicant
Jose Jacobo, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
114 W. Adams St., Ste. C103
Zoning Classification: DTC - Business Core HP
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Nov. 16, 2021.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations


Page 33

on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Hidden Kitchen (Series 12)
628 E. Adams St., Phoenix
Calls for police service: 1
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have completed the required certification. I have 10 years restaurant experience and
this is my second restaurant.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“All of my staff will go through the required training to comply with all of the state rules.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Anhelo
Liquor License Map - Anhelo

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 34
Liquor License Data: ANHELO
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 3 1

Wholesaler 4 1 0

Government 5 8 2

Bar 6 43 28

Beer and Wine Bar 7 13 6

Liquor Store 9 2 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 12 2

Hotel 11 8 6

Restaurant 12 85 43

Club 14 3 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 46.78 146.33 184.18

Violent Crimes 8.73 47.13 54.56

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 56 38

Total Violations 92 68




Page 35
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1129002 815 37 % 22 % 24 %

1129003 1372 4% 18 % 40 %

1131001 1015 7% 8% 28 %

1131002 1242 3% 7% 33 %

1141001 2299 16 % 37 % 44 %

1142001 1321 36 % 22 % 50 %

1143011 1389 22 % 15 % 57 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 36
Liquor License Map: ANHELO
114 W ADAMS ST




Ü
Date: 9/21/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 37



Report

Liquor License - Pho Bowl

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 161018.

Summary

Applicant
Jenny Le, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
1820 N. 75th Ave., Ste. 108
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Nov. 10, 2021.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.


Page 38


Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have a restaurant space and would love to increase sales by adding alcohol.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“I have multiple customers asked if we sell acohol. This would make them happy.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Pho Bowl
Liquor License Map - Pho Bowl

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 39
Liquor License Data: PHO BOWL
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Wholesaler 4 1 0

Bar 6 1 0

Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0

Liquor Store 9 3 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 7 2

Restaurant 12 17 2


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 46.78 185.69 309.76

Violent Crimes 8.73 25.37 40.76

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 56 94

Total Violations 91 154




Page 40
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1125033 1448 67 % 6% 8%

1125034 1913 70 % 12 % 32 %

1125081 2267 87 % 9% 19 %

1125091 1905 0% 15 % 22 %

1125092 1564 47 % 23 % 9%

1125093 2841 0% 14 % 49 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 41
Liquor License Map: PHO BOWL
1820 N 75TH AVE




Ü
Date: 9/15/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 42



Report

Liquor License - Mariscos Camaron Pelao

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 152182.

Summary

Applicant
Alfonso Romero, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
2445 E. Thomas Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 8

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application was Aug. 20, 2021. However, the
applicant submitted a written request for more time.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the


Page 43

State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Mariscos Camaron Pelao (Series 12)
350 N. Dysart Road, #201, Goodyear
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I currently have a liquor license with the same name in the City of Goodyear. I had
another liquor license in the city of Glendale several years ago and I sold the bar.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“There is no other mariscos/seafood restaurants within miles of our location. We pride
ourselv on the quality of our food. Mariscos/seafood is best served with a cocktail or an
ice cold bee Our restaurant is family orientated.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Mariscos Camaron Pelao
Liquor License Map - Mariscos Camaron Pelao

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 44
Liquor License Data: MARISCOS CAMARON PELAO
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 1 0

Bar 6 4 2

Beer and Wine Bar 7 3 2

Liquor Store 9 8 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 11 2

Restaurant 12 11 4


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 45.54 106.74 105.30

Violent Crimes 8.44 23.46 20.16

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 55 62

Total Violations 88 94




Page 45
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1107022 2172 32 % 20 % 32 %

1108021 948 75 % 27 % 13 %

1108022 1168 33 % 16 % 7%

1115011 2020 44 % 16 % 43 %

1115021 1414 46 % 21 % 34 %

1115022 2109 42 % 7% 17 %

1116011 1492 55 % 13 % 39 %

1116012 1200 65 % 11 % 40 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 46
Liquor License Map: MARISCOS CAMARON PELAO
2445 E THOMAS RD




Ü
Date: 6/24/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 47




PAYMENT ORDINANCE (Ordinance S-48072) (Items 11-12)
Ordinance S-48072 is a request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse funds, up to amounts indicated below, for the purpose of
paying vendors, contractors, claimants and others, and providing
additional payment authority under certain existing city contracts. This
section also requests continuing payment authority, up to amounts
indicated below, for the following contracts, contract extensions and/or
bids awarded. As indicated below, some items below require payment
pursuant to Phoenix City Code section 42-13.

11 Canyon Taxi LLC
For $52,500.00 in payment authority for a new contract, entered on or
about Nov. 1, 2021 for a term of five years for Wheelchair Transportation
Services for the Police Department. The Police Department identified that
wheelchair transportation services are needed for patrol officers to
transport suspects, victims, or witnesses, who are wheelchair-bound and
are transported during their investigations. The patrol vehicles are not
equipped to transport wheelchair-bound citizens. The lack of wheelchair
transportation services could potentially hinder, delay or interfere with an
investigation or criminal justice proceedings.

12 Central Arizona Water Conservation District doing
business as Central Arizona Project
For $32,619.00 in payment authority for a land lease license necessary
for the on-going right to use Central Arizona Project land and maintain
underground water lines for a five-year term for the Water Services
Department. The five-year term is March 21, 2021 to March 20, 2026 for
the Dynamite Road Land Lease number 2000-002, and July 1, 2021 to
June 30, 2026 for the Jomax Road Land Lease number 99-013 and Sept.
1, 2021 to Aug. 31, 2026 for the Tatum Boulevard and the Canal Lands
Case #2014-007.



Page 48



Report

Crane Rentals - Requirements Contract IFB 16-004 (Ordinance S-48078)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to extend and continue using
Ordinance S-42151 under Contract 141829 with Southwest Industrial Rigging to
provide crane rentals for Citywide use. Further request authorization for the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. No additional funds are needed.

Summary
The contract provides crane rentals as required for various facility operation projects
requiring heavy lifting citywide.

Contract Term
Upon approval, the term of the contract will be extended through Dec. 31, 2022.

Financial Impact
The contract was originally approved on Nov. 18, 2015 with an aggregate value of
$250,000. No additional funds are needed. Any remaining funds authorized by
previous City Council action will be applied to the extended contract terms.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The contract was originally approved by City Council on Nov. 18, 2015.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.




Page 49



Report

Authorization to Enter into Contract with Area Agency on Aging, Region One,
Inc. for COVID-19 Senior Assistance - Goods2Home Program (Ordinance S-
48085)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Area Agency on Aging, Region One, Incorporated (AAA) for $2,000,000 to
continue the Goods2Home program which provides home delivery of groceries,
prescriptions and other medical supplies for Phoenix senior residents. Further request
to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Summary
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Phoenix senior residents have concerns leaving their
homes to purchase groceries and pick-up prescriptions and other medical supplies.
Many older adults are unable to afford delivery fees associated with commercial
grocery home delivery programs and/or lack technology/computer literacy skills to
complete online ordering. In response, AAA created the Goods2Homes program which
provides personalized assistance to seniors with home delivery of groceries,
prescriptions and medical supplies. In July 2020, the City contracted with AAA for this
program using one-time CARES Act funding and will continue this service for Phoenix
seniors using American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds.

Contract Term
The term of this contract will begin on or about Nov. 1, 2021 and end on Dec. 31,
2024.

Financial Impact
Aggregate expenditures will not exceed $2,000,000. There is no impact to the General
Fund. Funding is available through the City’s allocation of the ARPA funds.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
On June 24, 2020, City Council approved the initial contract with AAA utilizing one-time
CARES Act funding through Ordinance S-46817.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Human Services
Department.

Page 50



Report

Arizona Commission on the Arts FY 2021-22 AZ Organizational Relief Grant
(Ordinance S-48087)

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to apply for, accept, and,
if awarded, enter into an agreement for up to $25,000 in Arizona Commission on the
Arts (ACA) Organizational Relief Grant funds for Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-22. Further
authorize the City Treasurer to accept and the City Controller to disburse the funds for
purposes of this ordinance. The grant funds would be used by the Phoenix Office of
Arts and Culture in FY 2021-22 to support the agency's operations and projects.

Summary
The ACA Organizational Relief Grant is intended to provide relief and recovery support
to arts and cultural organizations of all sizes, local arts and cultural organizations from
Sovereign Tribal Nations, whose primary mission is to produce, present, teach or serve
the arts. Funds may be used to support the agency's operations and projects. The
Phoenix Office of Arts and Culture has applied for and received annual grant funds
from the ACA since 1994. However, for FY 2021-22, the ACA only received federal
funds from the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) versus the state's general fund
regrant. This is the only category the Phoenix Office of Arts and Culture can apply to
this year.

If awarded, the grant funds will support the development and distribution of
informational materials regarding the arts and cultural community; provision of
management and technical assistance services to artists and cultural organizations;
development of educational public outreach programs that promote an appreciation of
arts and culture; and support for community arts and culture initiatives.

Financial Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Phoenix Office
of Arts and Culture.




Page 51



Report

Issuance of Economic Development Revenue Bonds (All Sports Village, Inc.
Project), Series 2021 (Resolution 21974)

Requests City Council approval for the issuance of Economic Development Revenue
Bonds (All Sports Village, Inc. Project), Series 2021, to be issued in one or more tax-
exempt or taxable series in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
$200,000,000.

Summary
Request City Council adoption of a resolution granting approval of the proceedings
under which The Industrial Development Authority of the City of Phoenix, Arizona (the
“Phoenix IDA”) has previously resolved to issue up to $200,000,000 of Economic
Development Revenue Bonds (the “Revenue Bonds”) for use by All Sports Village, Inc.
(the “Borrower”), a Connecticut not-for-profit corporation, to

a) finance, and/or refinance, as applicable, a portion of the acquisition, construction,
renovation, improvement, equipping, and operation of a state of the art, premier family
multi-sports park facility and entertainment complex in Windsor Locks, Connecticut,
and
b) pay certain costs related to the issuance of the Revenue Bonds.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix IDA Board has previously resolved to issue the Revenue Bonds at its
meeting held on October 14, 2021.

Location
The Project is located at or near the northeast corner of the intersection of Old County
Road and Connecticut Highway 20 in Windsor Locks, Connecticut.

With the exception of certain housing bonds, the Phoenix IDA can finance projects
located anywhere in Arizona. In addition, the Phoenix IDA may issue bonds to finance
projects outside of Arizona, if the out-of-state project provides a benefit within the
State.




Page 52

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer.




Page 53



Report

Issuance of Project Revenue Bonds (Provident Group - Costa Isabela Properties
LLC; Costa Isabela Conference Hotel Project), Series 2021 (Resolution 21975)

Requests City Council approval for the issuance of Project Revenue Bonds (Provident
Group - Costa Isabela Properties LLC; Costa Isabela Conference Hotel Project),
Series 2021, to be issued in one or more tax-exempt and/or taxable series in an
aggregate principal amount not to exceed $350,000,000.

Summary
Request City Council adoption of a resolution granting approval of the proceedings
under which The Industrial Development Authority of the City of Phoenix, Arizona (the
“Phoenix IDA”) has previously resolved to issue up to $350,000,000 of Project
Revenue Bonds (the “Revenue Bonds”) for use by Provident Group - Costa Isabela
Properties LLC (the “Borrower”), a Delaware limited liability company, to

a) finance, and/or refinance, as applicable, a portion of the acquisition, design,
construction, operation, and equipping of an approximately 356-room hotel and related
facilities in Isabela, Puerto Rico, and
b) pay certain costs related to the issuance of the Revenue Bonds.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix IDA Board has previously resolved to issue the Revenue Bonds at its
meeting held on Oct. 14, 2021.

Location
The Project is located at or near 396 Avenue Noel Estrada, Isabela, Puerto Rico.

With the exception of certain housing bonds, the Phoenix IDA can finance projects
located anywhere in Arizona. In addition, the Phoenix IDA may issue bonds to finance
projects outside of Arizona, if the out-of-state project provides a benefit within the
State.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer.



Page 54



Report

Issuance of Multifamily Housing Revenue Notes (Harmony at the Park Two
Project), Series 2021 (Resolution 21976)

Requests City Council approval for the issuance of Multifamily Housing Revenue
Notes (Harmony at the Park Two Project), Series 2021, to be issued in one or more tax
-exempt and/or taxable series in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
$20,000,000.

Summary
Request City Council adoption of a resolution granting approval of the proceedings
under which The Industrial Development Authority of the City of Phoenix, Arizona (the
“Phoenix IDA”) has previously resolved to issue up to $20,000,000 of Multifamily
Housing Revenue Notes (the “Revenue Notes”) for use by Harmony at the Park Two,
LLC (the “Borrower”), an Arizona limited liability company, to

a) finance, and/or refinance, as applicable, all or a portion of the acquisition,
construction, improvement, equipping, or operation of a multifamily residential rental
housing facility in Phoenix, Arizona, and
b) pay certain costs related to the issuance of the Revenue Notes.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix IDA Board has previously resolved to issue the Revenue Notes at its
meeting held on October 14, 2021.

Location
The Project is located at or near 600 North 20th Street in Phoenix, Arizona.

With the exception of certain housing bonds, the Phoenix IDA can finance projects
located anywhere in Arizona. In addition, the Phoenix IDA may issue bonds to finance
projects outside of Arizona, if the out-of-state project provides a benefit within the
State.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer.



Page 55



Report

Randox Evidence Investigator Analyzer Instruments - EXC 22-051 (Ordinance S-
48074)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Randox Toxicology for the one-time purchase of two Randox evidence investigator
analyzer instruments for the Police Department. Further request authorization for the
City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The aggregate contract value
will not exceed $113,520.

Summary
The Randox evidence investigator analyzer instruments serve as the preliminary drug
screening for all the blood specimens received in the toxicology section related to
driving under the influence of drugs/traffic, drug-facilitated crimes/sexual assault,
aggravated assault, and homicide investigations. The Randox instruments provide
simultaneous analysis for a large scope of analytes using a small volume, which is
ideal for this specific type of analysis. The Randox system is currently being used by
the laboratory and already validated for use for screening biological specimens for
drugs. The purchase of these instruments will replace the current system and provide
redundancy to minimize the risk of any delays due to instrument downtime.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, normal competition was waived as
a result of an approved determination, indicating that there is no other manufacturer of
the evidence investigator analyzer instruments.

The Assistant Finance Director recommends the one-time purchase with Randox
Toxicology be accepted.

Contract Term
This one-time purchase will begin on or about Nov. 3, 2021.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $113,520 and funds are available in the
Police Department’s budget.



Page 56

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.




Page 57



Report

Additional Expenditures for Fire Fighting Protective Hoods T16-151-01 -
Cooperative Requirements Contract (Ordinance S-48083)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 146399, with United Fire Equipment Company, dba
Matlick Enterprises, for the purchase of fire fighting protective hoods for the Phoenix
Fire Department (PFD). Further request authorization for the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed
$75,000.

Summary
The additional funds are needed to purchase extra protective hoods due to the
increased hiring of new firefighters, the increase of fires and the replacement of
damaged and worn hoods. The fire protective hoods are used by the Phoenix Fire
Department to protect the head and neck areas against extreme heat, hot particles
and other hazards encountered during a fire. The protective hood is essential personal
protective equipment (PPE) to daily firefighter protection and safety in high
atmospheric temperatures.

Contract Term
The contract term is Dec. 1, 2017 through Nov. 30, 2022.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $75,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $581,752. Funds are available in the Fire Department’s
budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This contract was originally approved by City Council on Nov. 15, 2017.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Fire Department.




Page 58



Report

Public Safety Communications Equipment - Requirements Contract RFP 11-
0004 / VH10965 (B) (Ordinance S-48080)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 143649 with Tessco Incorporated for the purchase of
public safety communication equipment for the Information Technology Services (ITS)
Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $150,000.

Summary
The contract is used by ITS to support the Phoenix Police and Fire departments, and
the Regional Wireless Cooperative (RWC). The Phoenix Police and Fire departments
lease copper circuits from the City’s telephone communications provider to link the
RWC, which are used to operate public safety radio communication equipment. The
telephone communications provider will no longer repair the circuits and related
equipment. Additional funds are needed to purchase wireless microwave hardware to
replace the leased circuits to ensure continued support of radio communications for
the Fire and Police departments.

Contract Term
The contract term is Sept. 1, 2016 to Dec. 30, 2021.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $150,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $733,500. Funds are available in the Information Technology
Services Department's budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This contract was originally approved by City Council on Aug. 31, 2016.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the Information
Technology Services Department.




Page 59



Report

Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport West Air Cargo Reconstruction -
Engineering Services - AV06000026 FAA (Ordinance S-48073)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Trace Consulting, LLC, to provide Engineering Services that include project
management, design, and possible construction administration and inspection services
for the Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport West Air Cargo Reconstruction
project. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreement as
necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below, and
for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The fee for services will
not exceed $2,046,000.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunications, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize
inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City
Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real
property.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to provide a complete reconstruction of the West Air
Cargo Apron at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PSHIA) in accordance with
the Aviation Capital Improvement Management Plan, the Airside Pavement
Assessment Program, and the most current Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
Advisory Circulars. This project is necessary because the West Cargo Apron has been
scheduled for remediation since originally identified on PSHIA Airfield Pavement
Management Program with a “poor” Pavement Condition Index rating. Airport
maintenance staff have completed repairs and replacements over the useful life to
keep operations open, but a reconstruction is needed to facilitate ongoing and growing
cargo operations at PSHIA. The project will optimize drainage and address existing


Page 60

drainage structures, along with minor utilities, lighting, and striping work.

Trace Consulting, LLC’s services include, but are not limited to: coordinate with all City
departments and aviation sections; perform environmental services requirements,
archeological review, and geotechnical engineering investigation; design new hot mix
asphalt concrete per FAA requirements; design airport service roads and traffic
controls; investigate the needs for replacing markings, signage, airfield lighting, and
utility conflicts; perform a project-wide survey to confirm existing surface and structure
elevation conditions; update drainage plans, electrical plans, and airside barricade
plan and service road detours; perform and provide documentation for FAA and Airport
Improvement Program grant compliance; provide cost estimates and package the
project to be constructed in different phases per grant allocations; provide possible
construction administration and inspection services; and other tasks as assigned for a
complete project.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) 34-603. In accordance with A.R.S. 34-603(H), the
City may not publicly release information on proposals received or the scoring results
until an agreement has been awarded. Three firms submitted proposals and are listed
below.

Selected Firm:
Rank 1: Trace Consulting, LLC

Additional Proposers:
Rank 2: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Rank 3: C&S Engineers, Inc.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement before the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Trace Consulting, LLC will not exceed $2,046,000, including
all subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Aviation Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Aviation Department anticipates grant funding for this project. The Budget


Page 61

and Research Department will separately review and approve funding availability prior
to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up to agreement limits for
all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the agreement termination.

Location
3400 E. Sky Harbor Blvd.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Aviation
Department, and the City Engineer.




Page 62



Report

Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Terminal 4 Infrastructure Fire Alarm
Replacement - Design-Build Services - AV21000102 (Ordinance S-48075)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Chasse Building Team, Inc. to provide Design-Build Services for the Phoenix Sky
Harbor International Airport Terminal 4 Infrastructure Fire Alarm Replacement project.
Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreement as necessary
within the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The fee for services will not exceed
$1 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all
necessary and appropriate action to execute all design and construction agreements,
licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the development, design,
and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but are not limited to:
electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunications, cable television, railroads
and other modes of transportation. Further request the City Council to grant an
exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize the City Manager to
include in this transaction's documents indemnification and assumption-of-liability
provisions otherwise prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This authorization
excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
This initial request is to enter into an agreement with Chasse Building Team, Inc. for
Design-Build Design Phase Services. At a future date, the City will request City
Council approval of the construction phase services after the project scope
requirements are developed and estimated.

The purpose of this project is to replace the existing Terminal 4 Fire Alarm (FA)/Voice
Evacuation System with a new, updated system. The existing fire alarm system in
Terminal 4 has been in place since 2003 and some parts of the system much longer
than that. The existing system has reached the end of its service life, according to the
manufacturer. To minimize the impact on terminal operations, this project will proceed
in phases while the existing system stays active. Night work and multiple shifts to
expedite the work will be required at certain locations.


Page 63


Chasse Building Team, Inc. will initially confirm project scope requirements and then
prepare a conceptual design adequate to provide a Guaranteed Maximum Price
(GMP) proposal. Chasse Building Team, Inc. will assume the risk of delivering the
project through a GMP agreement. Chasse Building Team, Inc. will be responsible for
construction means and methods related to the project and fulfilling the Small
Business Enterprise program requirements. Chasse Building Team, Inc. will be
required to solicit bids from pre-qualified subcontractors and to perform the work using
the City’s subcontractor selection process. Chasse Building Team, Inc. may also
compete to self-perform limited amounts of work.

Chasse Building Team, Inc.’s services for the initial design phase will include: verify
existing as-built conditions against record drawings, provide options and
recommendations for the new FA/Voice Evacuation System, ensure the new system
will communicate with the existing network, identify code-related upgrades, assume
responsibility for design, engineering and permitting of entire FA/Voice Evacuation
System, develop project schedule and detailed phasing plan with stakeholder input,
develop cost estimates and a GMP that is within the City’s budget, execute the
construction plan in coordination with stakeholders, and ensure existing FA/Voice
Evacuation System remains operable during all phases of the project to allow
continuous occupancy and use of the facility.

This Agreement is essential to the health, safety, and welfare of the Public and critical
operations for the City.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S. 34-
603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received or the
scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Four firms submitted proposals and are
listed below.

Selected Firm
Rank 1: Chasse Building Team, Inc.

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: Caliente Construction, Inc.
Rank 3: Sun Eagle Corporation
Rank 4: The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company, Inc.




Page 64

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from issuance of the Notice to Proceed. Work
scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term may
be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Chasse Building Team, Inc.'s initial design phase services will
not exceed $1 million, including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Aviation Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.

Location
3400 E. Sky Harbor Blvd.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Aviation
Department, and the City Engineer.




Page 65



Report

Maintenance and Repair of Vehicle Barriers and Security Gates - Amendment
(Ordinance S-48079)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 146545 with Phoenix Fence Company, Inc. to provide additional funding for
installation, inspection, repair, maintenance, and/ or replacement of vehicle barriers
and security gates on an as needed basis at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport,
Phoenix Deer Valley Airport, and Phoenix Goodyear Airport (Airports). Further request
to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional
funds will not exceed $150,000.

Summary
On Dec. 13, 2017, the City Council approved this contract to provide installation,
inspection, repair, maintenance, and/or replacement of vehicle barriers, turnstiles,
security gates, gate operating systems, controls bollards, and their supporting
infrastructure on an as need basis for the Airports.

The purpose of this amendment is to provide additional funds, which are necessary for
repairs related to an increase in unanticipated damages caused by storms, vehicles
and other similar incidents.

Contract Term
There is no change to the current five-year term of the contract, which began on Jan.
1, 2018 and includes three, one-year options to extend the term that may be exercised
at the sole discretion of the Aviation Director.

Financial Impact
The initial authorization for the Maintenance and Repair of Vehicle Barriers and
Security Gates contract was for an expenditure not-to-exceed $500,000. This
amendment will increase the authorization for the contract by an additional $150,000,
for a new total not-to-exceed contract value of $650,000.

Funding is available in the Aviation Department's budget.




Page 66

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Contract 146545 (Ordinance S-44125) on Dec. 13, 2017.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport and surrounding airport properties - 3400 E.
Sky Harbor Blvd.
Phoenix Deer Valley Airport - 702 W. Deer Valley Road
Phoenix Goodyear Airport - 1658 S. Litchfield Road Goodyear, Ariz.
Council Districts: 1, 8 and Out of City

Responsible Department
The Item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 67



Report

I-10 West Extension Route and Transit Type Recommendation

This report requests City Council approve an amendment to the current Locally
Preferred Alternative (LPA) of the 10WEST Project (formerly known as the Capitol/I-10
West Light Rail Extension Phase II Project) to include extending to the Desert Sky
Transit Center in a future phase (Attachment A), and to reaffirm light rail as the mode
of transit for the 10WEST Project.

Summary
In 2012, the Phoenix City Council approved the current LPA (Attachment B),
extending light rail from downtown Phoenix to the 79th Avenue/I-10 Park-and-Ride
facility. Then in 2016, City Council and the Valley Metro Rail Board of Directors
approved a phased approach to the Project:
· Phase I - connect downtown Phoenix to the State Capitol Complex; and
· Phase II - extend the system west along I-10 to the 79th/I-10 Avenue park-and-ride.

In 2019, the Phoenix City Council requested additional public outreach and input on
both phases. Public input was sought in three key areas:
· Identify a preferred Capitol Extension option;
· Explore a potential 10WEST extension to the Desert Sky Transit Center; and
· Review all options for high-capacity, high-frequency transit types for the 10WEST
extension.

Technical Analysis Summary
As part of the analysis of other transit types for 10WEST, staff considered other high-
capacity transit (HCT) types for the corridor, including bus rapid transit (BRT).

Staff evaluated the following criteria in considering other transit types:
· Community input;
· Ridership potential;
· Capital and operating cost;
· Constructability;
· Operational characteristics;
· Consistency with other local plans; and


Page 68

· Economic development potential.

The technical analysis involving all of the criteria above revealed that light rail is still
warranted as the transit type for 10WEST because it provides the highest ridership
potential of all HCT types considered, with the potential for approximately 50 percent
more riders than BRT. Although light rail involves higher upfront capital costs, the total
lifecycle cost of light rail when accounting for all associated costs and total project
ridership is comparable to enhanced BRT.

Since most of the project corridor is not located within an existing local roadway,
traditional light rail constructability challenges (such as utility relocations and right-of-
way acquisition) are also significantly lowered. This should produce cost savings and
schedule improvements during construction as compared to other light rail construction
projects, as well as improved travel times and reliability during operations.

Operationally, light rail would integrate seamlessly into the region’s HCT system by
connecting with the Capitol Extension just west of the State Capitol Complex, providing
west valley residents with a one-seat ride to various notable destinations (like Phoenix
Sky Harbor International Airport and ASU’s Main Campus, among others). It also
would be able to travel approximately 10 percent faster than other HCT types, while
providing a higher peak rider capacity. Lastly, the public has expressed support for light
rail as the transit type for 10WEST, both during the public meetings summarized below
and in local plans, such as the Maryvale Village Core Urban Design Plan and the
Maryvale Character Area Plan. Both of these community documents favor light rail due
to the associated economic development impacts that light rail can provide compared
to other transit modes.

Desert Sky Transit Center Extension
Regarding extending service to the Desert Sky Transit Center, staff looked at the
following criteria:
· Ridership potential;
· Competitiveness for federal funding;
· Connections to activity centers and other transit routes; and
· Consistency with local plans and public input.

The technical analysis revealed that extending 10WEST service to the Desert Sky
Transit Center is warranted because it will serve additional riders with the potential of
generating approximately 18 percent additional passenger boardings. The extension
will connect two regional activity centers, Ak-Chin Pavilion and Desert Sky Mall, both of
which have been identified as community assets in the Maryvale Character Area Plan.


Page 69

In addition, the added potential ridership is supported by the proximity of two schools,
as well as existing and planned multi-family housing. Also, the Desert Sky Transit
Center, located adjacent to the mall, provides connectivity to existing and future transit
service, including three local routes, a rural route to Ajo, and the MARY neighborhood
circulator, as well as the potential to connect with BRT in the future. Lastly, the public
has expressed support for this extended service, both during the public meetings and
in the Maryvale Village Core Urban Design Plan.

Next Steps
Once approved by City Council, City of Phoenix and Valley Metro staff will:
· Conduct the necessary steps to progress the Project into preliminary engineering
and environmental assessment; and
· Continue coordination with West Valley communities.

Financial Impact
Funding for the 10WEST Project is expected to be a mix of local, regional, and federal
dollars. Federal funding for fixed guideway transit projects is generally provided
through the Federal Transit Administration’s Capital Investment Grant (CIG) program.
Based on current eligibility criteria and preliminary analysis, the 10WEST Project
remains competitive for federal funding.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Citizens Transportation Commission to recommended approval of this item on
Aug. 26, 2021, by a vote of 14-0.
The Transportation, Infrastructure and Planning subcommittee recommended approval
of this item on Oct. 20, 2021, by a vote of 4-0.

Public Outreach
In January 2020, Valley Metro held three public meetings (two in English and one in
Spanish) to provide information and seek input on the Project, including the Desert Sky
Transit Center extension, options for phasing to possibly accelerate the Project, and
transit-type options. Approximately 84 percent of the 183 survey respondents favored
extension to the Desert Sky Transit Center. Respondents also expressed interest in
exploring different transit types.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, outreach shifted to utilizing online platforms between
May and June 2020. Throughout the process, members of the public had the ability to
submit questions and comments to be evaluated by and responded to by project staff,
and all meeting information was presented in English and Spanish. Additionally, four
live (call-in) meetings were conducted (two in English and two in Spanish). In total, the



Page 70

online public meeting website was visited 1,355 times, and 334 people provided
feedback, either by general questions and comments or through a feedback survey
form.

At the public meetings, Valley Metro provided information regarding a potential
extension of 10WEST to the Desert Sky Transit Center. In response, 77 percent of the
198 survey respondents felt positive about adding this extension to the Project, with 14
percent remaining neutral and 9 percent feeling negative. The survey also sought input
on 10WEST transit-type options (light rail compared to an exclusive bus way). Of the
149 responses to this question, 75 percent stated they preferred light rail over an
exclusive bus way, with 16 percent preferring the bus way and 9 percent expressing no
preference.

Location
10WEST will extend north to I-10 and along I-10 west to the Desert Sky Transit Center
in a future phase via 79th Avenue.
Council Districts: 4 and 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Public Transit
Department.




Page 71
Attachment A
Recommended Route: 10West




Page 72
Attachment B
2012 Locally Preferred Alternative




Page 73



Report

Capitol Extension and I-10 West Extension Equitable Housing and Land Use
Planning Request for Proposals

This report requests City Council approval for issuance of a Request for Proposals to
procure consulting services to assist with the research, implementation, and execution
of the Capitol Extension and I-10 West Extension Transit-Oriented Development (TOD)
Grant. This Grant will assist with equitable housing strategy development and
proactive land use planning.

Summary
The Federal Transit Administration awarded to the City of Phoenix this TOD Grant on
Sept. 1, 2020. The grant’s purpose is to assist cities in developing equitable housing
strategies and proactive land use planning along transit project corridors. Land use
planning will advance TOD in the corridors and the region by advancing efforts with
residents, business owners, and community leaders to create a comprehensive plan
that lays the groundwork for new development that is urban, mixed-use, and built to a
pedestrian scale. Such planning will also strengthen and improve opportunities for
equitable housing that, when combined with new light rail lines, will improve the
community’s quality of life and economic vitality.

The TOD grant will cover the Capitol Light Rail Extension (CAPEX), as well as the
subsequent I-10 West Light Rail Extension (10WEST), recognizing that the project is
being evaluated to identify an end-of-line at either the 79th Avenue Park-and-Ride or
the Desert Sky Transit Center (Attachment A). The CAPEX TOD planning area is
generally bounded by 7th Avenue on the east, Interstate 17 on the west, Interstate 10
on the north, and the Union Pacific Railroad on the south. The 10WEST TOD planning
area is generally bounded by I-17 on the east, 83rd Avenue on the west, Encanto
Boulevard/Osborn Road on the north, and Van Buren Street on the south.

The grant will also provide resources for the City of Phoenix to work closely with the
community to develop and implement policy plans in the corridor by: collecting a
detailed inventory of existing land uses, hosting community stakeholder workshops
and meetings, working with the community to develop a community vision, and
identifying strategies and performance measures to implement the vision. Additionally,
the TOD Grant will fund the development of an Equitable Housing Strategy, as well as


Page 74

two TOD policy plans (one each for the CAPEX and 10WEST light rail extensions).
The scope of work summary for these planning efforts are included in Attachment B.

Financial Impact
The estimated total expenditure of the project is $2.5 million from the following funding
sources:
· Federal Transit Administration TOD Grant - $2 million; and
· City of Phoenix Transportation 2050 Funds - $500,000.

The project will be administered over two fiscal years:
· Fiscal Year 2021-22 - $750,000; and
· Fiscal Year 2022-23 - $1.75 million.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Citizens Transportation Commission recommended approval of this item on Sept.
23, 2021, by a vote of 11-1.
The Transportation, Infrastructure and Planning subcommittee recommended approval
of this item on Oct. 20, 2021, by a vote of 4-0.

Location
Capitol Extension will extend light rail from downtown Phoenix west to the Arizona
State Capitol Complex.
Council District: 7

I-10 West Extension runs from the Arizona State Capitol to the Desert Sky Transit
Center.
Council Districts: 5 and 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Public Transit
Department.




Page 75
Attachment A




Page 76
Attachment B

CAPITOL/I-10 TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) PLANNING GRANT
FTA TOD PLANNING GRANT PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK SUMMARY

Phase, Task, & Subtasks Description Deliverables
PHASE ONE (WHO WE ARE) Two Draft "Who We Are" Sections of Policy Plans
Task 1: Community Profile and Existing Conditions
Understand the unique characteristics, inventory, and evaluate the corridor through the six
Two Existing Conditions and Needs Assessment Reports
Subtask 1.1: Record Existing Conditions planning element framework (Land Use, Housing Economic Development, Health Mobility,
(One for Capitol Area and One for I-10 Area)
and Green Systems).
Build upon the six planning element existing conditions assessment and clearly articulate Two Community Profile reports
Subtask 1.2: Create a Community Profile
community needs towards innovative “best practice community investments”. (One for Capitol Area and One for I-10 Area)

Identify stakeholders and develop a plan to focused on reducing displacement and ensuring Two Stakeholder/Early Action Recommendations Memos
Subtask 1.3: Capacity Building
equitable engagement opportunities are provided early and throughout the process. (One for Capitol Area and One for I-10 Area)

PHASE TWO (WHAT WE WANT) Two Draft "What We Want" Sections of Policy Plans
Task 2: Public Engagement and Early Action
Implementation
Listen to the community voice, concerns, needs, and shared understanding of the current
Two Early action public involvement plan
Subtask 2.1: Build Trust and Relationships state of their communities. Learn with the community what the existing conditions and
(One for Capitol Area and One for I-10 Area)
community profile begin to reveal.
Two week-long Public Engagement Workshops to engage and gather perspectives on
Two Public Engagement Workshop Summary Reports
Subtask 2.2: Meaningful Opportunities to Engage current and desired conditions in the context of the six planning elements to generate a
(One for Capitol Area and One for I-10 Area)
shared and collective community vision for the future.
Considering the results thus far, begin formulating early action implementation strategies to
Two Early Action Implementation Reports
Subtask 2.3: Early Action Implementation be considered prior to the start of construction and operation impacts and create report
(One for Capitol Area and One for I-10 Area)
detailing suggested strategies
Task 3: Community Vision and Master Plan
Two week-long Community Design Workshops building off previous tasks to demonstrate
Two Community Design Workshop Summary Reports
Subtask 3.1: Conceptual Design Workshop appropriate scale and intensity in alignment with community prioritized investments and the
(One for Capitol Area and One for I-10 Area)
community vision.
Two series of Illustrative Plans and written narratives describing the design
A written and graphical series of illustrative plans and renderings which will delineate a
Page 77
components and development concepts reflecting the community vision for the
Subtask 3.2: Illustrative Plans generalized block pattern, building, street and open space typologies, consistent with the
future.
community identified and prioritized areas of change, investments, and vision for the future.
(One for Capitol Area and One for I-10 Area)
Provide distinct and descriptive character areas and associated building and housing
Subtask 3.3: Character Areas typologies to be applied and consistent with the community vision for adoption into the Form-Based Code recommendations Memo.
Walkable Urban Code.

Two Draft "How We Get There" Sections to bring Two full Draft Policy Plans
PHASE THREE (HOW WE GET THERE)
to completion (One for Capitol Area and One for I-10 Area)
Task 4: TOD Policy Plan(s)
The State Capitol Complex is made up of mostly publicly held property, owned by either City
of Phoenix, Maricopa County, or the State of Arizona. There is a large amount of vacant or
Deliverables are reiterative of the all tasks and represent a synthesis of the full
underutilized land (parking lots and low-density development) in the State Capitol Complex
Subtask 4.1: Capitol Mall TOD Policy Plan project scope formatted into representative Sections of the 3 key steps: “Who We
area, providing significant opportunities for new TOD. This policy plan will also address how
Are”, “What We Want”, “How We Get There”:
this new development will complement the existing neighborhoods in the State Capitol
Complex area.
High capacity transit along Interstate 10 corridor may create challenges for pedestrian
connectivity, higher densities, and TOD. This strategic plan will include peer analysis to Deliverables are reiterative of the all tasks and represent a synthesis of the full
Subtask 4.2: I-10 TOD Policy Plan determine best practices for developing TOD adjacent to a highway corridor. It will also project scope formatted into representative Sections of the 3 key steps: “Who We
address specific solutions for connectivity, especially to the areas north and south of Are”, “What We Want”, “How We Get There”:
Interstate 10.
Task 5: Equitable Housing Strategy
Understand the existing housing choices available prior to light rail and or high capacity
One Full Draft Equitable Housing Strategy Report (inclusive of content and
Subtask 5.1: Existing Housing Preservation transit, identify housing choices that provide the most just, fair, and inclusive (equitable)
recommendations from subtasks 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3)
opportunities for residents in TOD environments.
Identify the preferred locations for New Housing options and provide recommendations on One Full Draft Equitable Housing Strategy Report (inclusive of content and
Subtask 5.2: New Housing Assessment
the appropriate Housing Typologies to be consistent with the existing character and context. recommendations from subtasks 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3)
Delineate the general boundaries of district character areas and develop a menu of potential
One Full Draft Equitable Housing Strategy Report (inclusive of content and
Subtask 5.3: Equitable Housing Typologies building and housing typologies that will fit existing lot sizes and integrate with a transit-
recommendations from subtasks 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3)
oriented environment.



Report

Northwest Extension Phase II Active Transportation and Land Use Planning
Request for Proposals

This report requests City Council approval for issuance of a Request for Proposals to
procure services to assist with the research, implementation, and execution of the
Northwest Extension Phase II Transit-Oriented Development Grant. This grant will
assist with active transportation strategy development and proactive land use planning.

Summary
The Federal Transit Administration awarded to the City of Phoenix this Transit-Oriented
Development (TOD) grant on Dec. 15, 2020. The grant’s purpose is to assist cities in
developing active transportation strategies and proactive land use planning along
transit project corridors. Land use planning will advance TOD in the corridors and the
region by working with residents, business owners, and community leaders to create a
comprehensive plan that lays the groundwork for new development that is urban,
mixed-use, and built to a pedestrian scale. Such planning will also strengthen and
improve opportunities for multi-modal transportation that, when combined with new
light rail lines, will improve the community’s quality of life and economic vitality.

The grant will cover the Northwest Extension Phase II Light Rail Extension (NWEII)
project area, generally bounded by 19th Avenue on the east, 35th Avenue on the west,
Peoria Avenue on the north, and Butler Road on the south (Attachment A).

The grant will also provide resources for the City of Phoenix to work closely with the
community to develop and implement policy plans in the corridor by: collecting a
detailed inventory of existing land uses, hosting community stakeholder workshops
and meetings, working with the community to develop a community vision, and
identifying strategies and performance measures to implement the vision. Additionally,
the TOD Grant will fund the development of an Active Transportation Plan and a TOD
policy plan for the project area. The scope of work summary for the planning efforts are
included in Attachment B.

Financial Impact
The estimated total expenditure of the project is $1.25 million from the following
funding sources:


Page 78

· Federal Transit Administration TOD Grant - $1 million; and
· City of Phoenix Transportation 2050 Funds - $250,000.

The project will be administered over three fiscal years as follows:
· FY 2021-22 - $250,000
· FY 2022-23 - $750,000
· FY 2023-24 - $250,000

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Citizen Transportation Commission recommended approval of this item on Sept.
23, 2021, by a vote of 11-1.
The Transportation, Infrastructure and Planning subcommittee recommended approval
of this item on Oct. 20, 2021, by a vote of 4-0.

Location
The TOD Grant will cover the Northwest Extension Phase II Light Rail Extension
project area.
Council Districts: 3, 4 and 5

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Public Transit
Department.




Page 79
Attachment A




Page 80
Attachment B
NWEII TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) PLANNING GRANT
FTA TOD PLANNING GRANT PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK SUMMARY

Phase, Task, & Subtasks Description Deliverables
PHASE ONE (WHO WE ARE) One "Who We Are" Section of Policy Plan
Task 1: Community Profile and Existing Conditions
Understand the unique characteristics, inventory, and evaluate the corridor through the six
Subtask 1.1: Record Existing Conditions planning element framework (Land Use, Housing Economic Development, Health, Mobility, One Existing Conditions and Needs Assessment Reports
and Green Systems).
Build upon the six planning element existing conditions assessment and clearly articulate
Subtask 1.2: Create a Community Profile One Community Profile reports
community needs towards innovative “best practice community investments”.
Identify stakeholders and build capacity towards reducing displacement and ensuring
Subtask 1.3: Capacity Building One Stakeholder/Early Action Recommendations Memos
equitable engagement opportunities are provided early and throughout the process.

PHASE TWO (WHAT WE WANT) One Draft "What We Want" Section of Policy Plan
Task 2: Public Engagement and Early Action
Implementation
Listen to the community voice, concerns, needs, and shared understanding of the current
Subtask 2.1: Build Trust and Relationships state of their communities. Learn with the community what the existing conditions and One Early action public involvement plan
community profile begin to reveal.
One week-long Public Engagement Workshop to engage and gather perspectives on current
Subtask 2.2: Meaningful Opportunities to Engage and desired conditions in the context of the six planning elements to generate a shared and One Public Engagement Workshop Summary Report
collective community vision for the future.
Considering the results thus far, begin formulating early action implementation strategies to
Subtask 2.3: Early Action Implementation One Early Action Implementation Report
be considered prior to the start of construction and operation impacts.
Task 3: Community Vision and Master Plan
One week-long Community Design Workshop building off previous tasks to demonstrate
Subtask 3.1: Conceptual Design Workshop appropriate scale and intensity in alignment with community prioritized investments and the One Community Design Workshop Summary Reports
community vision.
Page 81 A written and graphical series of illustrative plans and renderings which will delineate a One series of Illustrative Plans and written narratives describing the design
Subtask 3.2: Illustrative Plans generalized block pattern, building, street and open space typologies, consistent with the components and development concepts reflecting the community vision for the
community identified and prioritized areas of change, investments, and vision for the future. future.
Provide distinct and descriptive character areas and associated building and housing
Subtask 3.3: Character Areas typologies to be applied and consistent with the community vision for adoption into the Form-Based Code recommendations Memo.
Walkable Urban Code.

One Draft "How We Get There" Section to bring One full Draft Policy Plan to
PHASE THREE (HOW WE GET THERE)
completion
Task 4: Active Transportation Implementation Plan

Understand the existing transportation network available prior to light rail, identify evaluation One Full Draft Active Transportation Implementation Plan Report (inclusive of
Subtask 5.1: Active Transportation Assessment
metrics for recommending an inclusive and equitable transportation network. content and recommendations from subtasks 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3)
Conduct a planning and decision making process to identify an overarching vision for the
One Full Draft Active Transportation Implementation Plan Report (inclusive of
Subtask 5.2: Active Transportation Decision Making area and propose specific recommendations consistent with the transit oriented
content and recommendations from subtasks 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3)
environments.
Finalize recommendations for the active transportation infrastructure network and One Full Draft Active Transportation Implementation Plan Report (inclusive of
Subtask 5.3: Active Transportation Master Plan
recommend implementation strategies, policies, and actions to achieve the vision. content and recommendations from subtasks 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3)



Report

West Phoenix High Capacity Transit Study

This report requests City Council approval to initiate a study of high-capacity transit
options for West Phoenix.

Summary
In partnership with Valley Metro, City of Phoenix staff are recommending the study of
high-capacity transit (HCT) options in West Phoenix (Central Avenue to 91st Avenues,
McDowell Road to Camelback Roads). This study will build upon previous planning
efforts to continue expanding mobility options for West Phoenix residents, workers,
and visitors.

Adding HCT in West Phoenix is a key component of the expanded transit program
outlined in the voter-approved Transportation 2050 (T2050) plan. The study would be
funded by regional transit funds (Prop. 400) and also potentially funded by a Federal
Transit Administration (FTA) grant available for areas of persistent poverty, as further
explained in this report.

Background of previous HCT studies
HCT in West Phoenix was first studied in coordination with the City of Glendale in
2010. Planning efforts progressed in three studies until a Phoenix City Council action
in 2019 put the project on hold. The three studies were as follows:
· Study I: Glendale HCT Study (2010-12);
· Study II: West Phoenix/Central Glendale Light Rail Extension Study (2013-17); and
· Study III: West Phoenix Light Rail Extension Study (2017-19).

Study I explored bringing HCT to the Westgate Entertainment District. Five preferred
corridors were identified, two of which connected to Phoenix’s Northwest Phase I
extension (running along Glendale Avenue to Westgate). The remaining three corridor
options connected to the future I-10 West Extension (running north from 79th Avenue/I
-10 to Westgate). The results of the study advanced an option to extend light rail west
on Glendale Avenue from 19th Avenue, with stations approximately every mile along
Glendale Avenue to the Westgate area.

Study II built upon the Glendale HCT Study, but with two major changes in scope:


Page 82

· Changing the end-of-line from the Westgate Entertainment District to downtown
Glendale; and
· Comparing alternative alignments in West Phoenix to better serve activity centers in
the area.

While Study I focused on extending light rail along Glendale Avenue, Study II
evaluated a total of six alignments to identify the most productive corridor. At the
conclusion of Study II, the proposed alignment would begin at the existing 19th
Avenue/Camelback Road light rail station, head west along Camelback Road to 43rd
Avenue, and then head north toward Glendale Avenue, where the alignment would
then turn west toward downtown Glendale.

The benefits of this alignment for West Phoenix residents included higher ridership
projections than Study I and better connectivity to activity centers, such as Grand
Canyon University and Alhambra High School. In the selection of this alignment, a total
of 110 public outreach activities were conducted and numerous stakeholders were
engaged. Study II concluded in December 2017, at which time the Glendale City
Council voted to withdraw from the project.

Study III explored building the Phoenix-only portion of the proposed Study II corridor,
which would extend light rail on Camelback Road between 19th and 43rd avenues (
Attachment A). Study III concluded in March 2019 when Council voted to defer the
Camelback Road light rail project to the end of the T2050 program.

Phoenix BRT Status
The Phoenix BRT Program recently concluded its 2020 Council-directed analysis of
potential corridors in Phoenix (Attachment B). At their May 21, 2021 meeting, the
Citizens Transportation Commission unanimously recommended that City Council
approve the 35th Avenue/Van Buren option as the initial BRT corridor in Phoenix. The
same recommendation was approved unanimously at the Sept. 15, 2021
Transportation, Infrastructure and Planning Subcommittee meeting.

Next Steps
If this high-capacity study is approved, Valley Metro and the City of Phoenix will
complete the West Phoenix HCT Study by building upon the previous studies and
expanding the scope to further analyze how to better serve the West Phoenix Area (
Attachment C), bounded by 35th and 67th avenues and McDowell and Camelback
roads. Data from Valley Metro’s 2019 Origin and Destination Survey shows this area is
one of the top areas in the region where transit trips begin.




Page 83

Much of the area also qualifies as “Areas of Persistent Poverty” under federal
guidelines, with a poverty rate of at least 20 percent of the population. The FTA's Areas
of Persistent Poverty Program Grant is available to provide 90 percent of funds for
planning, engineering, and technical studies to improve transit services in such
identified communities.

Any work conducted for this West Phoenix HCT Study would be in close coordination
with the Phoenix BRT Program to ensure that the planning efforts are cohesive and the
preferred corridors identified for HCT will integrate into the overall transit plan to
improve connections to West Phoenix. This Study and associated community outreach
would analyze potential alternatives, looking both to identify the most productive
corridors and HCT modes for West Phoenix.

Phoenix and Valley Metro staff would follow the outline below for the West Phoenix
HCT Study’s scope:
· Provide project management from both Valley Metro and City of Phoenix staff;
· Prioritize and further develop community and stakeholder relationships;
· Identify existing and future conditions;
· Define purpose and needs;
· Analyze potential corridors for HCT;
· Develop and propose preferred networks;
· Define preferred alternatives for light rail corridors;
· Develop an implementation strategy; and
· Prepare results for City Council adoption of a HCT corridor.

Financial Impact
It is anticipated that the duration of this study effort would take 18-24 months. The total
estimated cost of the study is approximately $950K. Phoenix has applied for FTA's
Areas of Persistent Poverty Program Grant to fund up to 90 percent of the study cost.
Matching grant funds are available through regional (Prop. 400) funds.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Citizens Transportation Commission recommended approval of this item on Aug.
26, 2021, by a vote of 14-0.
The Transportation, Infrastructure and Planning subcommittee recommended approval
of this item on Oct. 20, 2021 by a vote of 4-0.

Location
West Phoenix HCT would expand transit access in the greater Maryvale Area of West
Phoenix, with a primary study area of roughly Central Avenue to 91st Avenues and


Page 84

McDowell Road to Camelback Roads.
Council Districts: 4, 5 and 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Public Transit
Department.




Page 85
Attachment A
Study III: West Phoenix Light Rail Extension Study (2017-19)




Page 86
Attachment B
Phoenix BRT: Most Preferred Network Scenario




Page 87
Attachment C
West Phoenix Council Districts and Study Area




Page 88



Report

Capitol Extension Route Recommendation and Preconstruction Estimate
(Ordinance S-48076)

This report requests City Council approval to amend the current Locally Preferred
Alternative (LPA) for the 19th Avenue option of the Capitol Extension (CAPEX),
formerly known as the Capitol/I-10 West Extension Phase I project (Attachment A),
and requests an ordinance authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into
an agreement with Valley Metro Rail for the Capitol Extension Light Rail Project to fund
the completion of pre-construction activities for the extension. This report also requests
the City Controller disburse funds not to exceed $45.3 million for these pre-
construction activities. See Attachment B for additional details and cost breakdown.

Summary
In 2012, the Phoenix City Council approved the current LPA (Attachment C). Then in
2016, the Council and Valley Metro Rail Board of Directors approved a phased
approach to the project:
· Phase I - connect downtown Phoenix to the State Capitol Complex; and
· Phase II - extend the system farther west along I-10 to 79th Avenue.

In 2019, the Phoenix City Council requested additional public input on both phases.
Public input was sought in three key areas:
· Identify a preferred CAPEX option;
· Explore a potential extension to Desert Sky Transit Center; and
· Review all options for high-capacity, high-frequency transit types for the I-10 West
Extension (10WEST).

Technical Analysis Summary
Opportunities to refine the CAPEX project emerged due to robust downtown
development and the previous evolution of the South Central Extension/Downtown
Hub (SCE/DH) project. Accordingly, the route between downtown Phoenix and the
State Capitol Complex along Jefferson Street has been reevaluated, with input on all
potential alternatives solicited from the public and local stakeholders.

Based on Valley Metro’s technical analysis, the use of Washington Street (as opposed
to the double-track on Jefferson Street as identified in the previous LPA) was given


Page 89

further consideration recognizing the volume of residential and employment land uses
in proximity to Washington Street, as well as the opportunity to provide an improved
connection to the State Capitol Complex and to the 10WEST extension.

During the CAPEX reassessment process, Valley Metro identified and evaluated five
potential alignments:
· 2012 LPA Route - Double-track on Jefferson Street, west of 8th Avenue;
· Concept A - Double-track on Washington Street, west of 8th Avenue;
· Concept B - 15th Avenue loop;
· Concept C - Separate 18th or 19th Avenue loop options (Attachment D); and
· Washington Street - Double-track on Washington Street, west of 3rd Avenue (this
option was removed due to design challenges that could have negative impacts to
the downtown core).

The technical analysis revealed that Concept C would outperform the other options
given the benefits of the 18th/19th Avenue Loop, including:
· More service to residential and employment centers;
· Maximizes potential ridership and access for current and future users;
· Higher operational efficiencies and better preparation for a 10WEST connection;
· Lower impacts to historic and government properties;
· Mitigates impacts to bus operations and other vehicular traffic; and
· Greater opportunity to implement Council-approved Complete Streets concepts and
multimodal transportation elements along Washington and Jefferson streets.

Concurrent with the technical evaluation, the project team pursued an extensive public
engagement effort that included:
· Attending meetings with community groups;
· Attending meetings with key stakeholders and businesses along the corridor,
including state government representatives; and
· Conducting and participating in public meetings and community events.

Valley Metro and the City of Phoenix will need to amend the funding agreement when
the project is ready to advance to the construction phase.

Financial Impact
The City of Phoenix will fund an amount not to exceed $45.3 million for pre-
construction activities. Funds are available in the Public Transit Department's Capital
Improvement Program.




Page 90

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Citizens Transportation Commission recommended approval of this item on Aug.
26, 2021, by a vote of 13-2.

The Transportation, Infrastructure and Planning Subcommittee recommend approval of
this item on Oct. 20, 2021, by a vote of 4-0.

Public Outreach
In January 2020, Valley Metro held three public meetings (two in English and one in
Spanish) to present the four CAPEX options. A majority of respondents expressed
support for the 18th/19th Avenue Loop option (Concept C), with approximately 54
percent of the 183 surveys favoring the option. The results of these meetings were
used to refine the meeting materials for the next series of public meetings.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, outreach shifted to utilizing online platforms from May
27 to June 30, 2020. Throughout the process, members of the public had the ability to
submit questions and comments to be evaluated by and responded to by project staff,
and all meeting information was presented in English and Spanish. Additionally, four
live (call-in) meetings were conducted (two in English and two in Spanish) on June 16
and 20, 2020. In total, 356 people participated via either the online public meeting or
live call-in sessions, as well as 183 individuals responding to a survey.

Given the advantages of Concept C compared to the other options, and the results of
the January 2020 public meetings, the May/June 2020 online public meeting presented
Concept C as the “leading alternative.” Staff asked participants to document whether
they felt “positive,” “neutral,” or “negative” toward the option. Out of the 183 responses
received from the May/June online survey, 67 percent of respondents expressed
feeling positive about Concept C as the leading alternative, with 19 percent neutral and
14 percent negative.

State Stakeholder Coordination
In October 2020, the Arizona Department of Public Safety (DPS) sent a letter to the
Phoenix City Council expressing concerns with the 18th Avenue option, resulting in a
delay of the LPA approval process. Since November 2020, the project team has held
multiple meetings with representatives from the State of Arizona, including DPS, the
Arizona Department of Administration, Arizona Governor’s Office, and staff from the
State Senate and House of Representatives to further examine the 18th Avenue
segment of Concept C. As a result of these discussions and after further evaluation,
Concept C was amended to remove 18th Avenue from consideration. Consequently,
the project team conducted preliminary analysis and conceptual designs to refine and
recommend 19th Avenue as the preferred north/south location of the loop portion of


Page 91

the LPA. Additional engagement, including public notification and stakeholder
meetings, are underway to convey this change to the public.

Location
Capitol Extension will extend light rail from downtown Phoenix west to the State
Capitol Complex.
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Public Transit
Department.




Page 92
Attachment A
Recommended Alignment “19th Avenue Option”




Page 93
Attachment B
Estimated Design and Pre-construction Activities Budget

Activity Estimated Budget Notes
Preliminary engineering including 15% and
Preliminary Engineering (PE) $5,400,000 30% designs, and community outreach during
the PE and EA phases.
Environmental Assessment (EA) $1,800,000 N/A
Includes design up to 100% with community
Final Design $23,300,000
outreach during this phase.
Constructability, third party utility design and
Pre-Construction $10,600,000
real estate support
Contingency at 10% of PE, EA, Final Design
Contingency $4,200,000
and Pre-construction total.
TOTAL $45,300,000




Page 94
Attachment C
2012 Locally Preferred Alternative




Page 95
Attachment D
Previously Recommended Route (2020) “Concept C”




Page 96



Report

Purchase of Polaris Ranger Utility Vehicles (Ordinance S-48082)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
C&W Motors, Inc., dba RideNow Powersports Chandler for the purchase of Polaris
Ranger utility vehicles. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. This item will have an aggregate amount of $366,830.

Summary
The Public Works Department is seeking to enter into a contract with C&W Motors for
the purchase of Polaris Ranger utility vehicles for various City departments including
the Police, Fire, Water Services and Aviation departments. These vehicles are used for
transport of staff or equipment in off road environments or where quick mobility is
required, such as navigating through crowds during large events.

Procurement Information
Invitation for Bid 22-FSD-025 was conducted in accordance with Administrative
Regulation 3.10. The Public Works Department notified 89 vendors in regards to the
solicitation, and received one bid from C&W Motors. The bid was evaluated based on
responsiveness, responsibility, as well as bid price, with the below bid being
recommended for award based on the purchase price of two Polaris Rangers:

C&W Motors: $27,790

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about Jan. 1, 2022, with an initial one-year contract
period, and four contract option years to be exercised in increments of up to one year,
for a total contract term of five years.

Financial Impact
This item will have an estimated annual expenditure of $73,366, with a total aggregate
amount of $366,830 over the life of the contract.

Funding is available in various City departments' budgets.




Page 97

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and Public Works
Department.




Page 98



Report

Intergovernmental Agreement with Flood Control District of Maricopa County for
51st Avenue and Dobbins Road Storm Drain Project (Ordinance S-48077)

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement with the Flood Control District of Maricopa County for
the 51st Avenue and Dobbins Road Storm Drain Project. The design phase will include
final design, rights-of-way acquisition, temporary construction easements, and utility
relocations. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept, and the City
Controller to disburse, all funds related to this item. The estimated project cost for the
design phase is $3.5 million of which the City's cost share is estimated to be $1.75
million.

Summary
In late 2015, the Flood Control District of Maricopa County (FCDMC), in partnership
with the City of Phoenix, initiated a study to update the Laveen Area Drainage Master
Plan for the South Phoenix/Laveen area using new mapping and comprehensive flood
model software. The updated study used data gathered from heavy rains and flooding
that occurred in August and September of 2014. The study included analysis of
existing regional drainage improvements such as detention basins, channels, storm
drains and culverts, much of which had been constructed based on recommendations
from earlier versions of the regional drainage master plans. Construction efforts prior
to this study focused mainly on the downstream portion of the overall recommended
regional system to provide an outfall for future improvements closer to the foothills.
The study recommends additional regional drainage facilities extending further up into
the watershed area to address neighborhood flooding issues that became more
apparent during the 2014 storms.

The regional rainfall-runoff model now covers the entire study area. The new model
identifies sources of stormwater flows so mitigation alternatives can be developed.
Flood prone areas known as Areas of Mitigation Interest (AoMIs) were identified
through the updated study. A total of five potential mitigation alternatives were
developed and presented at two public meetings held in May of 2017, at which time,
comments were received from attendees. After further technical analysis of potential
mitigation alternatives, the following alternative component is proposed as one of the
recommended drainage master plans for the study area.


Page 99


Financial Impact
The estimated cost for this design phase is $3.5 million, which includes final design,
rights-of-way acquisition, temporary construction easements, and utility relocations.
The terms of the Intergovernmental Agreement between the City and the FCDMC will
jointly cost share for project development of the 51st Avenue and Dobbins Road Storm
Drain Project. The cost-share distribution between the City of Phoenix and FCDMC will
maintain an overall 50/50 cost share, which is the standard cost- share allocation for
projects funded by FCDMC. The City's contribution for the design phase of this project
will be up to $1.75 million dollars and is available in the City's five-year Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) budget.

The project is generally located along 51st Avenue, between Dobbins Road and
Sunrise Drive extending towards Olney Avenue the existing South Mountain Freeway
Drainage Basin.
Council Districts: 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and Karen Peters,
and the Street Transportation and Public Works departments.




Page 100



Report

Salt River Project Construction License for 27th Avenue and Thomas Road:
Railroad Crossing Upgrade - ST85100198 (Ordinance S-48086)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a Construction
License with Salt River Project for railroad crossing modifications in the area of 27th
Avenue and Thomas Road. Further request the City Council to authorize a change to
indemnification to authorize inclusion in the document pertaining to this transaction of
indemnification and assumption of liability provisions that are prohibited by Phoenix
City Code 42-18.

Summary
The purpose of this license is to allow the City to construct railroad crossing
modifications, including sidewalk, ramps and traffic signal upgrades that will include
irrigation under crossings as well as equipment that will run parallel with Salt River
Project irrigation facilities in the area of 27th Avenue and Thomas Road. This work is in
conjunction with City Project ST85100198 27th Avenue and Thomas Road: Railroad
Crossing Upgrade.

Contract Term
The term of the Construction License is one year, effective when the City begins
construction, expected to be late November 2021.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City of Phoenix for this license.

Location
27th Avenue and Thomas Road
Council Districts: 4 and 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.




Page 101



Report

Support for Formation of Terrell Terrace Irrigation Water Delivery District
(Resolution 21973)

Request to adopt a resolution to support formation of the Terrell Terrace Irrigation
Water Delivery District through Maricopa County. The proposed Irrigation Water
Delivery District includes the single-family residential properties bounded by Pinchot
Avenue to the south, Curnow Drive to the north, 22nd Street to the west, and 24th
Street to the east. This action has no financial impact to the City of Phoenix.

Summary
Under the provisions of Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) Chapter 20, title 48,
Irrigation Water Delivery Districts, when the majority of the lot or parcel owners entitled
to or capable of receiving irrigation water from the same system want irrigation water
delivered to their lands, they may propose the organization of an Irrigation Water
Delivery District (IWDD). Maricopa County requires that applicants for an IWDD within
process of forming or re-establishing a district.

If approved by the City Council, landowning neighbors seeking an IWDD complete a
special taxation impact statement and submit this document to the Maricopa County
Board of Supervisors. The Board of Supervisors, along with Salt River Project (SRP),
will decide if a petition to organize an IWDD may be circulated. See Attachment A for
the Consent from SRP to the Board of Supervisors and map of the SRP delivery
system.

This request has been reviewed by the Street Transportation and Water Services
departments.

Financial Impact
This action has no financial impact to the City of Phoenix.

Public Outreach
On June 14, 2021, the City received a formal written request from City of Phoenix
resident Eileen Wells, representative for the Terrell Terrace neighborhood, to pursue


Page 102


Location
The proposed IWDD includes the single-family residential properties bounded by
Pinchot Avenue to the south, Curnow Drive to the north, 22nd Street to the west, and
24th Street to the east.
Council District: 4

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.




Page 103
$WWDFKPHQW$±&RQVHQWIURP653WR%RDUGRI6XSHUYLVRUV
DQG0DSRI653'HOLYHU\6\VWHP




Page 104
1-06.1-94.00 337046 204207


23RD ST 24TH ST
1 336666
341636 344276 133506 341616 342916 336646 204087


337606 337536 337616 343056 337656 337566 337506 336586 337486 337646 336766
- 101657

22ND ST
133506 342926 3366966.1 101687 101667
-9 336486 B 35
4 2410 2418 0.4 ac 2426
2124 2130 2134 2140 2146 2314 2320 2328 2402
2202 2206 2212 2216 2222 2226 2232 2236 2240 2246 2302 2310 2330
OSBORN OSBORN
OSBORN RD
OSBORN RD OSBORN RD
OSBORN RD OSBORN RD RD
OSBORN RD OSBORN RD RD
2121 (
! 2127 2133 2139 (
! 2143 2145S %
! 2201 2207 2213 2221 2225 2231
%
!
2237 T 2243
T !
%
T 2301 2307 2315 2319 2325 2331 2333 2347
Î.1 Xs
Î -9
24012403 2409 2413
23RD ST

108196 337466 343726
A 151 0.2 ac
108386 22ND ST 108126 327316 113986 107896 344246

3329 33313333335

339166 -6
133606 133606 89847
A 27 0.2 ac
A 37

24TH ST
0.4 ac 113926 203467 203547 A 153
0.2 ac
!
%
A 2 0.2 ac A 28 0.2 ac
%
!
S %
!
S %
!
S !
%
S !
%
S
Å !
%
S S 133426 89867
A 36 0.2 ac 113936
107916 327126 A 154 0.2 ac
107526 107886 338916 343206 23RD ST

327216 22ND ST
107846 3306
3302 3308
A 35 113996
0.2 ac A 32 0.2 ac A 3 0.2 ac A 4 0.2 ac A 6 0.2 ac 89637
A 155 0.2 ac
8186 124 2132 2138 2142 2150 2202 2208 2214 2220 2226 2232 2238 2244 2302 2308 2314 2320 2326 2332 2336
MULBERRY
2 MULBERRY MULBERRY

3222 3226
38 0.4 ac MULBERRY DR MULBERRY DR
DR DR !
%
S %
! %
!
2201 S 2207
(
! !
%
2213 S 2219 S2225 %
! 2231 2237 2243 S
!
% 2301 2307 2309 2317 2321 2325 2331 2335 DR
132907 89657
A 156 0.2 ac
107956 336676
108036 108076 327396
114666 114046

3214 3220
337236 113107
114146 338436 338426 338636 338506 338516 338376 338416 338526
A 12




22ND ST 22ND ST
23RD ST
A 55 A 54 0.2 ac 0.2 ac A 148 0.2 a
A 9 0.2 ac A 8 0.2 ac A 7 0.2 ac
0.2 ac 107826 3300
107186 3216 3215 107126 107926 3315

24TH ST
114676 A 16
A 56 0.2 ac!
% A 22 0.2 ac
3311 191637
S
%
! !
% %
! !
%
114166114266 21ST PL
0.2 ac S S
114116 S S
3208 343876 344096 3208 107816

A 11 107856
114446 107866 107796 108086 23RD ST 338446 338396 338496 338356 338626 338386
A 15 0.2 ac
338406 A 147 0.2 ac
0.2 ac A 14 201127
3204 3201 3202

A 40 0.2 ac
337706 343896 108026 0.2 ac
107836 A 10 0.2 ac
2214 2220 2226 2232 2238 2244 2336 2420 2428
2202 2208 2302 2308 2312 2318 2322 2326 2332
FL OW FLOWER ST
14016 3150 3147 342116 338256 3150 E FLOWER ST FLOWER ST FLOWER ST
%
!
FLOWER ST
2201 2207 2211 2217 2223 2229 2235 2239 2245 R ST 2323 2421 2423




337996 338126 337956 338146 338156 338136 338176 337986 337976
3142 3145
114646 3146



A 58 0.2 ac

22ND ST 23RD ST 32213233
3138 3139 3140

24TH ST
114806 337526 8877
A 59 0.2 ac

337816 338036 338296 339106 338046 338196 338186 339226 337876

108647 B 6 0.2 ac

209017 108697

3130 3132 3129 3135
A 61 0.2 ac
3130 3136
132346 342266
!
%
22022208 2212 2218 2224 2228 2234 2240 2244
07416 107746 337866 MONTEREY WAY S
22012207 2211 2217 2223 2227 2233 2239 2243
2422 2426

338056 338006

338066 337966
CHEERY

338096 337786 337906 338086 338076
CHEERY

23RD ST
14356 3126 3121 107406 337636 LYNN RD LYNN RD

3866 3118 3119
402546 338026 3114
22ND ST 3120


338206 338106 338116 337896 337796 337946 337916 338016
A 62 0.2 ac
42 0.2 ac

!
%
S
24TH ST
3114 3115
343076 3110

A 64 0.2 ac 23RD 327196 3109 134347 759
CHEERY 2212 2218 2224 2228 2234 2240 2244 ST

A 43 0.2 ac
3102 3108 3102 3106 344086 327006 326976

114556 337476 LYNN RD 2211 2217 2225 2227 2233 2239 2243


23RD ST
337926 10656 3114


22ND ST 337806 337776 337766


114526 337206 A 13 0.2 ac
108536 337826
2302 2306 2312 2316
%
!
EARLL 2134 CURNOW S EARLL DR EARLL DR
DR
EARLL DR EARLL DR (
! A 12 0.2 ac
337886 (
! (
! (
! DR
CURNOW DR
344026 3046
2415 2417 2425 24

A 14 0.2 ac
107156 108526

108476 114566
23RD ST
A 66 0.2 ac 107136 A 11 0.2 ac
3031 3035 22ND ST 24TH ST 202867 201727 202267
%
!
S
A 8 0.2 ac 3042
A 6 0.2 ac
A 4 0.2 ac A 3 0.4 ac
A 5 0.2 ac
108046 343686
A 10 0.2 ac 337846
3032 A 67




3033035 3043
3025 3037
A 44 0.2 ac 337146




A 68 0.2 ac
%
! 22022208 2214 2220 2226 2232 2238 2244 2302 2308 2314
S 0.2 ac EARLL DR
%
!
107146 327496
%
!
S !
% %
! !
% %
! %
!
2243 2249 2301 2307
3027 3028
22012207 2213 2219 2225 2231 2237
S S 2313 2326
2328 2344 134297 201567
3030 (
! S S S S EARLL DR

22ND ST
A 69 0.2 acA 70 0.2 ac
106986 Å
327226!% 344076 336716 106996 114196 107116 %
!
23372339 2341 2343
S (
!
303032 3036
S


343106 327166
107196 107766 109066
3022 A 72 A 71 0.2 ac 3022 A 25 A 24 201447
A 26 0.2 ac A 20 0.2 ac A 19 0.2 ac
A 18 326996
A 23 0.2 ac A 21 0.2 ac
A 17
A 22 0.2 ac
0.4 ac



114606 114696
0.2 ac 0.4 ac
107276 0.2 ac 0.2 ac
3015 %
!S 342756 %
! !
% !
% %
!
S


3012 3016
3016 A 73 0.2 ac S S S
3021 327456 203567 3014 A3020
V
3011 24TH
24 TH AL 242
21ST PL
114656 338276 3024

24TH ST

!
%
S 3015
PL DRPLO 4
N
107476 10736 201647
4576 342986 3008 10746 327376
00 34 A 27
53 0.2 ac213007 A 28 10716 134357
A 30 2.5 ac
6 ST 0. 74 96 3008

22ND ST
114636 1.25 ac
9 2 337196 3004 202017 3008
29 PL 3 ac 10736

24TH PL 202297
29 6
A 27 133576 133576

3001 3007
33 3002
58 6
72 74 6 2.5 ac 201877
16 29
54 30
01 3
37 735 3002


24TH ST
26 33 2302 2316 2326 PINCHOT 2418 PINCHO
PRIVATE
PRIVATE
2230 2242 2314
PRIVATE
PRIVATE
2 2222
33 95 PINCHOT
PINCHOT AVE PINCHOT AVE PINCHOT AVE PINCHOT AVE
71 0 PINCHOT AVE PINCHOT AVE AVE AVE
2921 AVE
( !
%
22ND ST
86 !
66 2201 2211 2241 2315 2317 S
46 ST

24TH PL
71 2944
DR DR
DR DR
33 29 PL
33 42
73 291 SST 10756
46 30
34 21 T 201457


PRIVATE DR PRIVATE DR
29 PL

24TH ST
76 PL 203977
10786 10776 10766 24TH

343186 10806 2932
201607 PL

2930 2929 H
24 T
132336 2928
PRIVATE DRPRIVATE DRPRIVATE DR 203587 24
2925 203627 PL 29
%
!
S
344216 2926


FI 9
EL

24TH ST
D
RD 130126 10826
GR 10816 133636
EE N 108466

130126 202947
GREENFIELD RD
RD 24TH ST
-6

LD
.1 Xs 23402342 2406
2150 -5 2250 2302 2322



F IE
THOMAS 6 THOMAS
THOMAS RD
THOMAS RD THOMAS RD THOMAS RD THOMAS RD THOMAS RD RD
RD 2415
!
%
24TH ST
2303 2323 2333 2345
(
! 2131 2233


22ND ST 24TH PL
S (
21ST PL
!
280526 201787
sX
76 202777
839 2843
122986 12496 278016 Î 133416 336656 201327
28 278366 201337




¯
)
"
Unknown P
;:!
Delivery Point B Breather Pipe
! }!% Plug !
% Standbox
Customer
³ MS


Dirt Î Delivery Gate (
! Clean Out P Pressure Valve *
å Trash Rack Readable ³
Xs Turnout Structure !
%
Pipe Q Ditch Check è
ÝÝ Pvt Pump T Wheel Standbox Measurement
°
ê Unknown Structure Slipform
Field Drain pvt ÖÒ Ò à (a Pvt System Connection °ê
ws Wheel-Slide Standbox
Site
Nov 18, 2020
Å Signup Board !V Air Release Valve ? Inline Gate Valve !
%
S Slide Standbox Ý Yard Box Excluded Land
SRP makes no representation as to the
accuracy of this mapping product nor as
0 300 600 900 to its fitness for a particular purpose.
Page 105
Feet
$WWDFKPHQW%5HTXHVW/HWWHUDQG0DS6XEPLWWHGE\7HUUHOO7HUUDFH

dŽ͗ŝƚLJŽĨWŚŽĞŶŝdž
͗^ĂůƚZŝǀĞƌWƌŽũĞĐƚ
DŽŶĚĂLJ͕:ƵŶĞϭϰ͕ϮϬϮϭ

&ƌŽŵ͗ŝůĞĞŶtĞůůƐ
Z͗ZĞƋƵĞƐƚĨŽƌ&ŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ/ƌƌŝŐĂƚŝŽŶtĂƚĞƌĞůŝǀĞƌLJŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ


ĞĂƌŝƚLJŽĨWŚŽĞŶŝdž


tĞĂƐĂŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚdĞƌƌĞůůdĞƌƌĂĐĞ͕ĂƌĞƌĞƋƵĞƐƚŝŶŐĐŽŶƐĞŶƚƚŽĨŽƌŵĂŶ/ƌƌŝŐĂƚŝŽŶtĂƚĞƌ
ĞůŝǀĞƌLJŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ;/tͿĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨWŚŽĞŶŝdž͘dŚĞƉƵƌƉŽƐĞŽĨĂŶ/tŝƐƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞĂŶ
ĞƋƵŝƚĂďůĞĚŝƐƚƌŝďƵƚŝŽŶŽĨĐŽƐƚƐĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƵƐĞĂŶĚŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŝǀĂƚĞ
ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚŝƌƌŝŐĂƚŝŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵ͘dŚŝƐŝƐĂĐĐŽŵƉůŝƐŚĞĚƵƐŝŶŐĂŶĂŶŶƵĂůDĂƌŝĐŽƉĂŽƵŶƚLJ
ƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ͘tĞĂƌĞĂƐŬŝŶŐƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨWŚŽĞŶŝdžƚŽƉĂƐƐƚŚŝƐƌĞƋƵĞƐƚŽĨƌĞƐŽůƵƚŝŽŶ͕
ĂƵƚŚŽƌŝnjŝŶŐƚŚĞĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶŽĨdĞƌƌĞůůdĞƌƌĂĐĞ/t͘

ŶĐůŽƐĞĚLJŽƵǁŝůůĨŝŶĚ^ĂůƚZŝǀĞƌWƌŽũĞĐƚƐĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůĂůŽŶŐǁŝƚŚŵĂƉƐŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ
ĂŶĚƚŚĞŚŽŵĞŽǁŶĞƌůŝƐƚ͘/ǁŝůůďĞƚŚĞƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝǀĞĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ/t͘KŶĐĞǁĞ
ƌĞĐĞŝǀĞĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨWŚŽĞŶŝdž͕ĂŶ/ŵƉĂĐƚ^ƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚƚŽĨŽƌŵǁŝůůďĞƐĞŶƚƚŽƚŚĞ
DĂƌŝĐŽƉĂŽƵŶƚLJŽĂƌĚŽĨ^ƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌƐƚŽŵŽǀĞƚŚĞƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĨŽƌǁĂƌĚ͘tĞĂƉƉƌĞĐŝĂƚĞLJŽƵƌ
ĂƚƚĞŶƚŝŽŶƚŽƚŚŝƐƌĞƋƵĞƐƚ͘&ŽƌƋƵĞƐƚŝŽŶƐƉůĞĂƐĞĐŽŶƚĂĐƚŵĞĂƚƚŚĞŶƵŵďĞƌďĞůŽǁ͘

^ŝŶĐĞƌĞůLJ͕

ŝůĞĞŶtĞůůƐ
ϮϮϬϳĂƌůůƌ
WŚŽĞŶŝdž͕ϴϱϬϭϲ
tĞůůƐ͘ĞŝůĞĞŶΛLJĂŚŽŽ͘ĐŽŵ
ϰϴϬͲϮϬϱͲϭϲϲϬ




Page 106
y,//d

>'>^Z/Wd/KE


dŚĞEŽƌƚŚŚĂůĨŽĨƚŚĞ^ŽƵƚŚĞĂƐƚYƵĂƌƚĞƌŽĨƚŚĞ^ŽƵƚŚĞĂƐƚYƵĂƌƚĞƌŽĨ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϮϳ͕dŽǁŶƐŚŝƉϮEŽƌƚŚ͕
ZĂŶŐĞϯĂƐƚ͕ŽĨƚŚĞ'ŝůĂĂŶĚ^ĂůƚZŝǀĞƌĂƐĞĂŶĚDĞƌŝĚŝĂŶ͕DĂƌŝĐŽƉĂŽƵŶƚLJ͕ƌŝnjŽŶĂ͖

yWdƚŚĞtĞƐƚϭϲϲ͘ϬϵĨĞĞƚŽĨƚŚĞ^ŽƵƚŚϯϯϬ͘ϮϯĨĞĞƚŽĨƚŚĞEŽƌƚŚŚĂůĨŽĨƚŚĞ^ŽƵƚŚĞĂƐƚYƵĂƌƚĞƌŽĨƚŚĞ
^ŽƵƚŚĞĂƐƚYƵĂƌƚĞƌŽĨƐĂŝĚ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϮϳ͖

E

yWdƚŚĞĂƐƚϰϵϴ͘ϯϬĨĞĞƚŽĨƚŚĞ^ŽƵƚŚϯϯϬ͘ϮϳĨĞĞƚŽĨƚŚĞEŽƌƚŚŚĂůĨŽĨƚŚĞ^ŽƵƚŚĞĂƐƚYƵĂƌƚĞƌŽĨƚŚĞ
^ŽƵƚŚĞĂƐƚYƵĂƌƚĞƌŽĨƐĂŝĚ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϮϳ͘




Page 107
11923022 11923033 11923050
Terrell Terrace IWDD
11918110J
11923032 11923051
11918110E
11923031 11923052 11918110G
11918110K

11923030 11923053 11915001
11918042 11918037 11918043 11918036 11918044 11918035 11918045 11918034 11918046 11918033
11918048 11918031
11918040 11918039 11918041 11918038
11918047 11918032

11918114B 11918117
E Cheery Lynn Rd
11923029A 11923054
N 23rd St 11918108 11918107 11918115 11918109 11918112
11923028A 11923055
11923027 11923026 11923025 11923024 11923023




11918114H 11918114G
E Curnow Dr
11918056 11918055 11918054 11918053 11918052 11918051 11918050

11917023B

11924023 11924024 11916043
11917008 11918049

11917002 11917003 11917004 11917005 11917006 11917007
11917001 11918057
11917017 11917019 11917021 11917022 11917020 11916042 11916039
11917023A 11916040

E Earll Dr
11924021 11924026 N 22nd St
N 21st Pl 11924020 11924027 60
11917028 11917030
11916045A
11917009 11917011A 11917012 11917013 11917014 11917015 11917025 11917026
11917016A 11917024B 11917024A 11917027 11917029
11924019 11924028
11917055A
N 24th St 11916030
11916047B
11924018 11924029 11917047
11924006 11924005 11924004 11924003 11924002 11924001



11917055B
Page 108
11924017 11917050D 11916029
11924030 11916058
11917033A
8 11917055C
11917056B 11917048 11917034 11917054D
40 0 11924031 11916028
92 11924016 11917056A
11 00 11924032
92 11917054H
4 0 3 11917055E 11917050E 11917045A 11916027 11916057
11 01 03 11917033B
92 24
4 1 11 9
11 01 E Pinchot Ave
92 4 2
N 24th Pl
11 01
92 11917100 11917119 11916085
4 3 11917058 11917093 11917088 11917083 11917120
11 01 11917101 11917118 11917121 11917135
92 4 11917059 11917092 11917087 11917082 11917031
14 11917102 11917117 11917134
11 0 Legend 11916075
11917060 11917091 11917086 11917081 11916086
24 11917103 11917116
11916105A
11 15 11917061 11917090 11917085 11917080 11917122
G 9 A Streets
ra 40 11917104 11917115 11917062 11917089 11917084 11917079
11917123 11917132
nd 11916103A
C 19 11917105 11917114 11917063 11917078 11917124 11917131
sr 1 2 11917099A
Tax Parcels
11917106 11917113 11917064 11917077
11917130 11917201A 11916102
11917107 11917112 11917066
11917067 11917038C Terrell Terrace IWDD
11917069 11917126 11917129
11917071 11916088
11917108 11917111 11917127 11917128
11917073 11916101A
11917109 11917110 11917065 11917074
11917076 City of Phoenix 9
11924041U 1 608
11917202 11917040A 11917046B 11917035 11916134 119 11916090




0 100 200 400 600 800
Date: 5/1/2021
Feet

WƌŽƉŽƐĞĚdĞƌƌĞůůƚĞƌƌĂĐĞ/t
ϱͬϯͬϮϬϮϭ


dŽƚĂů dŽƚĂů
dŽƚĂů džĞŵƉƚ dŽƚĂů ƐƐĞƐƐĞĚ džĞŵƉƚ EĞƚ
džĞŵƉƚ džĞŵƉƚ /ŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚ ƐƐĞƐƐĞĚ ƐƐĞƐƐĞĚ EĞƚ sĂůƵĞ ƐƐĞƐƐĞĚ ƐƐĞƐƐĞĚ dŽƚĂů
ŽƵŶƚWĂƌĐĞůEŽ dĂdžzĞĂƌ KǁŶĞƌEĂŵĞ /ŶĂƌĞKĨ DĂŝůŝŶŐĚĚƌĞƐƐ ŝƚLJ^ƚĂƚĞŝƉ ^ŝƚƵƐĚĚƌĞƐƐ ^ŝƚƵƐŝƚLJŝƉ ^ƚĂƚƵƐ dLJƉĞ >ĂŶĚ&s &s dŽƚĂů&s &s &s &s dŽƚĂů>Ws ;>WsͿ sĂůƵĞ sĂůƵĞ;>WsͿ ĐƌĞĂŐĞ
ϭ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϬϮ ϮϬϮϭ ϮϮϬϴZ>>>> ϮϲϰϬZ>>Z W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ϮϮϬϴZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ Ψϰϴ͕ϰϬϬ Ψϭϵϯ͕ϲϬϬ ΨϮϰϮ͕ϬϬϬ ΨϮϰ͕ϮϬϬ ΨϬ ΨϮϰ͕ϮϬϬ ΨϭϮϮ͕ϳϰϰ ΨϭϮ͕Ϯϳϰ ΨϬ ΨϭϮ͕Ϯϳϰ Ϭ͘Ϯϰϱ
Ϯ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϮϳ ϮϬϮϭ ϮϯϭϵZ>>>> ϲϵϵϬϲd,^dhE/dϭϬϮϯ ^Kdd^>ϴϱϮϱϭ ϮϯϭϵZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ΨϱϬ͕ϰϬϬ ΨϮϬϭ͕ϴϬϬ ΨϮϱϮ͕ϮϬϬ ΨϮϱ͕ϮϮϬ ΨϬ ΨϮϱ͕ϮϮϬ Ψϭϲϲ͕ϬϬϱ Ψϭϲ͕ϲϬϭ ΨϬ Ψϭϲ͕ϲϬϭ Ϭ͘ϭϴϴ
ϯ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϱϲ ϮϬϮϭ K^&ZDd^E^/DKE>> ϮϮϮϰW/E,Kds W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ϮϮϮϰW/E,Kds͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ΨϲϬ͕ϳϬϬ ΨϮϰϮ͕ϴϬϬ ΨϯϬϯ͕ϱϬϬ ΨϯϬ͕ϯϱϬ ΨϬ ΨϯϬ͕ϯϱϬ Ψϭϱϵ͕ϰϮϱ Ψϭϱ͕ϵϰϯ ΨϬ Ψϭϱ͕ϵϰϯ Ϭ͘ϰϲϴ
ϯ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϱϲ ϮϬϮϭ K^&ZDd^E^/DKE>> ϮϮϮϰW/E,Kds W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ϮϮϮϮW/E,Kds͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ Ψϭϭϲ͕ϯϬϬ Ψϰϲϱ͕ϯϬϬ Ψϱϴϭ͕ϲϬϬ Ψϱϴ͕ϭϲϬ ΨϬ Ψϱϴ͕ϭϲϬ Ψϭϳϲ͕ϴϳϭ Ψϭϳ͕ϲϴϳ ΨϬ Ψϭϳ͕ϲϴϳ Ϭ͘ϲϳϲ
ϰ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϬϴ ϮϬϮϭ ddZE/',KZ,KK^>> Ϯϲϭ^,ZZ/Z '/>ZdϴϱϮϵϲ ϮϮϰϰZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ Ψϱϳ͕ϳϬϬ ΨϮϯϬ͕ϵϬϬ ΨϮϴϴ͕ϲϬϬ ΨϮϴ͕ϴϲϬ ΨϬ ΨϮϴ͕ϴϲϬ Ψϭϱϳ͕ϭϬϱ Ψϭϱ͕ϳϭϭ ΨϬ Ψϭϱ͕ϳϭϭ Ϭ͘Ϯϰϰ
ϱ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϬϳ ϮϬϮϭ KZ'Z^KEDdd,t ϮϮϯϴZ>>Z W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ϮϮϯϴZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ Ψϳϯ͕ϯϬϬ ΨϮϵϯ͕ϱϬϬ Ψϯϲϲ͕ϴϬϬ Ψϯϲ͕ϲϴϬ ΨϬ Ψϯϲ͕ϲϴϬ ΨϮϯϱ͕ϭϮϯ ΨϮϯ͕ϱϭϮ ΨϬ ΨϮϯ͕ϱϭϮ Ϭ͘Ϯϯϴ
ϲ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϮϮ ϮϬϮϭ KZKE:EE/&ZͬE ϮϯϮϲZ>>Z W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ϮϯϮϲZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ Ψϰϳ͕ϬϬϬ Ψϭϴϴ͕ϯϬϬ ΨϮϯϱ͕ϯϬϬ ΨϮϯ͕ϱϯϬ ΨϬ ΨϮϯ͕ϱϯϬ ΨϳϬ͕ϴϰϴ Ψϳ͕Ϭϴϱ ΨϬ Ψϳ͕Ϭϴϱ Ϭ͘ϯϰϮ
ϳ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϭϲ ϮϬϮϭ h'Zz: ϮϮϰϯZ>>Z W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲϬϬϬϬ ϮϮϰϯZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ Ψϰϰ͕ϳϬϬ Ψϭϳϵ͕ϬϬϬ ΨϮϮϯ͕ϳϬϬ ΨϮϮ͕ϯϳϬ ΨϬ ΨϮϮ͕ϯϳϬ Ψϭϭϭ͕ϭϯϮ Ψϭϭ͕ϭϭϯ ΨϬ Ψϭϭ͕ϭϭϯ Ϭ͘Ϯϰϯ
ϴ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϬϱ ϮϬϮϭ ,E:hzW ϲϴ,KKsZs W,KE/yϴϱϬϬϰ ϮϮϮϲZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ΨϱϮ͕ϰϬϬ ΨϮϬϵ͕ϲϬϬ ΨϮϲϮ͕ϬϬϬ ΨϮϲ͕ϮϬϬ ΨϬ ΨϮϲ͕ϮϬϬ ΨϭϮϳ͕Ϭϳϱ ΨϭϮ͕ϳϬϴ ΨϬ ΨϭϮ͕ϳϬϴ Ϭ͘Ϯϰϭ
ϴ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϭϯ ϮϬϮϭ ,E:hzW ϮϮϮϱ'Z>>Z W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ϮϮϮϱZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ Ψϰϯ͕ϮϬϬ Ψϭϳϯ͕ϭϬϬ ΨϮϭϲ͕ϯϬϬ ΨϮϭ͕ϲϯϬ ΨϬ ΨϮϭ͕ϲϯϬ ΨϭϬϲ͕ϬϮϱ ΨϭϬ͕ϲϬϯ ΨϬ ΨϭϬ͕ϲϬϯ Ϭ͘Ϯϰϯ
ϵ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϭϰ ϮϬϮϭ KK<D/,>>ͬE/K>ZE ϮϮϯϭZ>>Z W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ϮϮϯϭZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ Ψϰϳ͕ϳϬϬ ΨϭϵϬ͕ϴϬϬ ΨϮϯϴ͕ϱϬϬ ΨϮϯ͕ϴϱϬ ΨϬ ΨϮϯ͕ϴϱϬ Ψϭϰϵ͕ϱϳϴ Ψϭϰ͕ϵϱϴ ΨϬ Ψϭϰ͕ϵϱϴ Ϭ͘Ϯϰϱ
ϭϬ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϮϰ ϮϬϮϭ ZKE/EKh'>^:zͬt,>Z>DDZ/ ϮϮϰϵZ>>Z W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ϮϮϰϵZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ Ψϱϲ͕ϰϬϬ ΨϮϮϱ͕ϳϬϬ ΨϮϴϮ͕ϭϬϬ ΨϮϴ͕ϮϭϬ ΨϬ ΨϮϴ͕ϮϭϬ Ψϭϱϭ͕ϵϵϱ Ψϭϱ͕ϮϬϬ ΨϬ Ψϭϱ͕ϮϬϬ Ϭ͘ϭϵϯ
ϭϭ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϭϮ ϮϬϮϭ /W/dZKZsK>dZh^d /W/dZKKZ/dZ ϮϮϭϵZ>>Z W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ϮϮϭϵZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ Ψϳϴ͕ϱϬϬ Ψϯϭϰ͕ϬϬϬ ΨϯϵϮ͕ϱϬϬ Ψϯϵ͕ϮϱϬ ΨϬ Ψϯϵ͕ϮϱϬ ΨϮϱϵ͕ϴϲϬ ΨϮϱ͕ϵϴϲ ΨϬ ΨϮϱ͕ϵϴϲ Ϭ͘ϯϲϱ
ϭϮ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϬϰ ϮϬϮϭ 'KE>^ZhEDͬEEddD ϮϮϮϮZ>>Z W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ϮϮϮϮZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ Ψϱϰ͕ϬϬϬ ΨϮϭϲ͕ϬϬϬ ΨϮϳϬ͕ϬϬϬ ΨϮϳ͕ϬϬϬ ΨϬ ΨϮϳ͕ϬϬϬ Ψϭϯϳ͕ϭϯϲ Ψϭϯ͕ϳϭϰ ΨϬ Ψϭϯ͕ϳϭϰ Ϭ͘Ϯϰϯ
ϭϯ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϬϲ ϮϬϮϭ ,ZEE:K^ͬZK^D ϯϭϭϵEϮϭ^dW> W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲϳϴϬϰ ϮϮϯϮZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ Ψϰϰ͕ϮϬϬ Ψϭϳϳ͕ϭϬϬ ΨϮϮϭ͕ϯϬϬ ΨϮϮ͕ϭϯϬ ΨϬ ΨϮϮ͕ϭϯϬ ΨϭϯϬ͕ϭϴϭ Ψϭϯ͕Ϭϭϴ ΨϬ Ψϭϯ͕Ϭϭϴ Ϭ͘Ϯϰϯ
ϭϰ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϭϱ ϮϬϮϭ ,hZd:K^W,'ͬD/EZs^ ϮϮϯϳZ>>Z W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲϳϴϬϯ ϮϮϯϳZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ Ψϱϯ͕ϲϬϬ ΨϮϭϰ͕ϱϬϬ ΨϮϲϴ͕ϭϬϬ ΨϮϲ͕ϴϭϬ ΨϬ ΨϮϲ͕ϴϭϬ Ψϭϳϵ͕ϲϳϳ Ψϭϳ͕ϵϲϴ ΨϬ Ψϭϳ͕ϵϲϴ Ϭ͘ϮϰϬ
ϭϱ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϭϳ ϮϬϮϭ ,h',^Z/EΘ>sEZ ϮϯϬϮZ>>Z W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϳ ϮϯϬϮZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ Ψϱϳ͕ϯϬϬ ΨϮϮϵ͕ϰϬϬ ΨϮϴϲ͕ϳϬϬ ΨϮϴ͕ϲϳϬ ΨϬ ΨϮϴ͕ϲϳϬ Ψϭϳϴ͕ϵϯϴ Ψϭϳ͕ϴϵϰ ΨϬ Ψϭϳ͕ϴϵϰ Ϭ͘Ϯϲϱ
ϭϲ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϭϭ ϮϬϮϭ <EEd,t>>^E/>E>t>>^ZsdZh^d ϮϮϬϳZ>>Z W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ϮϮϬϳZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ΨϲϬ͕ϭϬϬ ΨϮϰϬ͕ϲϬϬ ΨϯϬϬ͕ϳϬϬ ΨϯϬ͕ϬϳϬ ΨϬ ΨϯϬ͕ϬϳϬ Ψϭϱϯ͕ϮϯϮ Ψϭϱ͕ϯϮϯ ΨϬ Ψϭϱ͕ϯϮϯ Ϭ͘ϯϲϬ
ϭϳ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϬϵ ϮϬϮϭ <>/D/^DZ/KE ϮϮϬϭZ>>Z W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ϮϮϬϭZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ Ψϱϱ͕ϰϬϬ ΨϮϮϭ͕ϲϬϬ ΨϮϳϳ͕ϬϬϬ ΨϮϳ͕ϳϬϬ ΨϬ ΨϮϳ͕ϳϬϬ Ψϭϰϰ͕ϰϭϭ Ψϭϰ͕ϰϰϭ ΨϬ Ψϭϰ͕ϰϰϭ Ϭ͘ϮϰϬ
ϭϴ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϮϴ ϮϬϮϭ DZdd,DEEZsK>dZh^d ϮϯϯϳZ>>Z W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ϮϯϯϳZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ΨϲϬ͕ϭϬϬ ΨϮϰϬ͕ϰϬϬ ΨϯϬϬ͕ϱϬϬ ΨϯϬ͕ϬϱϬ ΨϬ ΨϯϬ͕ϬϱϬ Ψϵϭ͕ϰϮϳ Ψϵ͕ϭϰϯ Ψϰ͕ϭϭϳ Ψϱ͕ϬϮϲ Ϭ͘ϯϰϰ
ϭϵ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϮϱ ϮϬϮϭ KDWK:h^dͬ^/>sZ/KDZK ϮϯϬϳZ>>Z W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ϮϯϬϳZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ Ψϲϭ͕ϯϬϬ ΨϮϰϱ͕ϯϬϬ ΨϯϬϲ͕ϲϬϬ ΨϯϬ͕ϲϲϬ ΨϬ ΨϯϬ͕ϲϲϬ ΨϭϳϬ͕ϳϮϱ Ψϭϳ͕Ϭϳϯ ΨϬ Ψϭϳ͕Ϭϳϯ Ϭ͘Ϯϰϰ
ϮϬ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϮϭ ϮϬϮϭ WZZzZDKE ϮϯϮϮZ>>Z W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ϮϯϮϮZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ Ψϰϴ͕ϬϬϬ ΨϭϵϮ͕ϯϬϬ ΨϮϰϬ͕ϯϬϬ ΨϮϰ͕ϬϯϬ ΨϬ ΨϮϰ͕ϬϯϬ ΨϭϮϬ͕ϰϮϬ ΨϭϮ͕ϬϰϮ ΨϬ ΨϭϮ͕ϬϰϮ Ϭ͘ϯϭϲ
Ϯϭ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϯϰ ϮϬϮϭ W>:W/E,Kd,K>/E'^>> ϲϱϭtdKEdKZ ,E>ZϴϱϮϰϴ ϮϯϬϮW/E,Kds͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ΨϰϬϲ͕ϬϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϵϭϱ͕ϲϬϬ ΨϮ͕ϯϮϭ͕ϲϬϬ ΨϮϯϮ͕ϭϲϬ ΨϬ ΨϮϯϮ͕ϭϲϬ ΨϳϬϴ͕ϳϳϭ ΨϳϬ͕ϴϳϳ ΨϬ ΨϳϬ͕ϴϳϳ ϭ͘ϭϰϱ
Ϯϭ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϰϴ ϮϬϮϭ W>:W/E,Kd,K>/E'^>> ϲϱϭtdKEdKZ ,E>ZϴϱϮϰϴ ϮϮϰϮW/E,Kds͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ΨϰϬϲ͕ϬϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϱϲϵ͕ϰϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϵϳϱ͕ϰϬϬ Ψϭϵϳ͕ϱϰϬ ΨϬ Ψϭϵϳ͕ϱϰϬ ΨϲϬϰ͕ϳϱϲ ΨϲϬ͕ϰϳϲ ΨϬ ΨϲϬ͕ϰϳϲ ϭ͘ϭϰϱ
Ϯϭ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϱϬ ϮϬϮϭ W>:W/E,Kd,K>/E'^>> ϲϱϭtdKEdKZ ,E>ZϴϱϮϰϴ ϮϮϯϮW/E,Kds͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ΨϯϰϬ͕ϭϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϱϴϵ͕ϰϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϵϮϵ͕ϱϬϬ ΨϭϵϮ͕ϵϱϬ ΨϬ ΨϭϵϮ͕ϵϱϬ Ψϱϲϲ͕ϲϭϯ Ψϱϲ͕ϲϲϭ ΨϬ Ψϱϲ͕ϲϲϭ Ϭ͘ϵϱϵ
Ϯϭ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϱϬ ϮϬϮϭ W>:W/E,Kd,K>/E'^>> ϲϱϭtdKEdKZ ,E>ZϴϱϮϰϴ ϮϮϯϬW/E,Kds͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ Ψϭϭϲ͕ϰϬϬ ΨϬ Ψϭϭϲ͕ϰϬϬ Ψϭϭ͕ϲϰϬ ΨϬ Ψϭϭ͕ϲϰϬ ΨϯϮ͕ϵϮϲ Ψϯ͕Ϯϵϯ ΨϬ Ψϯ͕Ϯϵϯ Ϭ͘ϯϮϴ
ϮϮ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϮϲ ϮϬϮϭ Yh/EdE/>>ZKZdͬ'Z/E/d ϮϯϭϯZ>>Z W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ϮϯϭϯZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ Ψϰϲ͕ϬϬϬ Ψϭϴϰ͕ϮϬϬ ΨϮϯϬ͕ϮϬϬ ΨϮϯ͕ϬϮϬ ΨϬ ΨϮϯ͕ϬϮϬ Ψϭϭϯ͕ϯϬϬ Ψϭϭ͕ϯϯϬ ΨϬ Ψϭϭ͕ϯϯϬ Ϭ͘ϮϮϳ
Ϯϯ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϬϯ ϮϬϮϭ ZD/Z:s/ZW ϮϮϭϰZ>>Z W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲϳϴϬϰ ϮϮϭϰZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ Ψϱϰ͕ϱϬϬ ΨϮϭϴ͕ϭϬϬ ΨϮϳϮ͕ϲϬϬ ΨϮϳ͕ϮϲϬ ΨϬ ΨϮϳ͕ϮϲϬ ΨϭϱϬ͕ϰϰϳ Ψϭϱ͕Ϭϰϱ ΨϬ Ψϭϱ͕Ϭϰϱ Ϭ͘ϮϰϬ
Ϯϰ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϮϰ ϮϬϮϭ ZKDZK^EdK^Z ϲϰϱϬEϳϳZ '>E>ϴϱϯϬϯ ϮϯϬϭZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ Ψϰϱ͕ϳϬϬ ΨϭϴϮ͕ϵϬϬ ΨϮϮϴ͕ϲϬϬ ΨϮϮ͕ϴϲϬ ΨϬ ΨϮϮ͕ϴϲϬ ΨϭϮϭ͕ϲϱϳ ΨϭϮ͕ϭϲϲ ΨϬ ΨϭϮ͕ϭϲϲ Ϭ͘Ϯϰϴ
Ϯϱ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϮϬ ϮϬϮϭ ^WZ<Z>KEZ: W͘K͘Kyϱϰϭϴ W,KE/yϴϱϬϳϴ ϯϬϰϮEϮϰd,^d͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ Ψϯϭϭ͕ϰϬϬ Ψϱϵ͕ϰϬϬ ΨϯϳϬ͕ϴϬϬ Ψϲϲ͕ϳϰϰ ΨϬ Ψϲϲ͕ϳϰϰ Ψϯϭϲ͕ϳϮϲ Ψϱϳ͕Ϭϭϭ ΨϬ Ψϱϳ͕Ϭϭϭ Ϭ͘ϯϴϭ
Page 109
Ϯϱ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϮϯ ϮϬϮϭ ^WZ<Z>KEZ: W͘K͘Kyϱϰϭϴ W,KE/yϴϱϬϳϴ ϯϬϰϴEϮϰd,^d͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ΨϵϮ͕ϰϬϬ Ψϲϴ͕ϳϬϬ Ψϭϲϭ͕ϭϬϬ ΨϮϴ͕ϵϵϴ ΨϬ ΨϮϴ͕ϵϵϴ ΨϭϯϬ͕ϳϭϵ ΨϮϯ͕ϱϮϵ ΨϬ ΨϮϯ͕ϱϮϵ Ϭ͘ϭϬϮ
Ϯϲ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϮϵ ϮϬϮϭ ^dZdKEE< ϮϯϰϯZ>>Z W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ϮϯϰϯZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ Ψϱϵ͕ϴϬϬ ΨϮϯϵ͕ϯϬϬ ΨϮϵϵ͕ϭϬϬ ΨϮϵ͕ϵϭϬ ΨϬ ΨϮϵ͕ϵϭϬ Ψϵϯ͕ϱϯϳ Ψϵ͕ϯϱϰ ΨϬ Ψϵ͕ϯϱϰ Ϭ͘ϭϴϰ
Ϯϳ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϭϵ ϮϬϮϭ dZs/^:K,E:///ͬ^>>/ddK^Z ϮϯϭϰZ>>Z W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ϮϯϭϰZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ Ψϱϳ͕ϴϬϬ ΨϮϯϭ͕ϯϬϬ ΨϮϴϵ͕ϭϬϬ ΨϮϴ͕ϵϭϬ ΨϬ ΨϮϴ͕ϵϭϬ Ψϭϵϯ͕ϯϰϴ Ψϭϵ͕ϯϯϱ ΨϬ Ψϭϵ͕ϯϯϱ Ϭ͘Ϯϰϱ
ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϮϯ ϮϬϮϭ hDKDEtzEdZ^/E ϯϯϯϯsEhZE^d W,KE/yϴϱϬϬϴ ϮϯϰϰZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ  ϰ ΨϮϰϵ͕ϮϬϬ ΨϮϴϰ͕ϭϬϬ Ψϱϯϯ͕ϯϬϬ Ψϳϵ͕ϵϵϱ Ψϳϵ͕ϵϵϱ ΨϬ ΨϰϮϳ͕ϯϯϱ Ψϲϰ͕ϭϬϬ Ψϲϰ͕ϭϬϬ ΨϬ Ϭ͘ϯϱϮ
Ϯϴ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϬϭ ϮϬϮϭ s>>Z^ZK^>s ϮϮϬϮZ>>Z W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ϮϮϬϮZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ Ψϲϰ͕ϬϬϬ ΨϮϱϲ͕ϯϬϬ ΨϯϮϬ͕ϯϬϬ ΨϯϮ͕ϬϯϬ ΨϬ ΨϯϮ͕ϬϯϬ Ψϭϳϭ͕ϵϲϯ Ψϭϳ͕ϭϵϲ ΨϬ Ψϭϳ͕ϭϵϲ Ϭ͘ϮϰϬ
Ϯϵ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϭϴ ϮϬϮϭ tKKDEZ<ͬZzEd,Zz ϮϯϬϴZ>>Z W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ϮϯϬϴZ>>Z͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ΨϳϬ͕ϱϬϬ ΨϮϴϮ͕ϬϬϬ ΨϯϱϮ͕ϱϬϬ Ψϯϱ͕ϮϱϬ ΨϬ Ψϯϱ͕ϮϱϬ ΨϮϬϯ͕ϲϵϯ ΨϮϬ͕ϯϲϵ ΨϬ ΨϮϬ͕ϯϲϵ Ϭ͘ϮϮϮ
ϯϬ ϭϭϵͲϭϳͲϬϯϬ ϮϬϮϭ z:K,EDͬ,KE'zKtdZ ϮϳϭϮEϮϬd,Z W,KE/yϴϱϬϬϵ ϯϬϯϬEϮϰd,^d͕ W,KE/yϴϱϬϭϲ ΨϮϬϲ͕ϬϬϬ Ψϭϯϱ͕ϲϬϬ Ψϯϰϭ͕ϲϬϬ Ψϲϭ͕ϰϴϴ ΨϬ Ψϲϭ͕ϰϴϴ ΨϮϯϯ͕ϴϲϭ ΨϰϮ͕Ϭϵϱ ΨϬ ΨϰϮ͕Ϭϵϱ Ϭ͘Ϯϰϯ

hŶŝƋƵĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJŽǁŶĞƌ Ψϯ͕ϳϵϲ͕ϱϬϬ ΨϭϮ͕ϯϬϭ͕ϵϬϬ Ψϭϲ͕Ϭϵϴ͕ϰϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϳϬϲ͕ϯϴϱ Ψϳϵ͕ϵϵϱ Ψϭ͕ϲϮϲ͕ϯϵϬ Ψϳ͕ϯϲϵ͕ϱϴϱ ΨϴϭϮ͕ϴϯϰ Ψϲϴ͕Ϯϭϳ Ψϳϰϰ͕ϲϭϳ ϭϮ͘ϲϴϳ
džĞŵƉƚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ
ǀĞƌĂŐĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJƐŝnjĞ Ϭ͘ϯϰϯ



Report

Inspection and Repair of Hoist and Crane, American Inspection and Test, Inc. -
Amendment (Ordinance S-48081)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 150346 with American Inspection and Test, Inc., to provide additional
funding to the contract. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $83,800.

Summary
Request additional payment authority of $83,800 for Agreement 150346. American
Inspection and Test, Inc. is responsible for performing inspection and repairs of various
sized overhead hoists and cranes for Water Services, Aviation, Public Works, and the
Convention Center departments.

This amendment will add funding for repairs at multiple lift stations that were not
included in the original payment ordinance. The additional funds will cover fiscal years
2021-22 through 2024-25.

Financial Impact
The initial agreement for Inspection and Repair of Hoist and Crane was authorized for
a fee not-to-exceed $325,000. This amendment will increase the agreement by an
additional $83,800, for a new total not-to-exceed agreement value of $408,800.

Funding for this amendment is available in the Water Services Department's Operating
budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Inspection and Repair of Hoist and Crane Agreement
150346 (Ordinance S-45797) on June 19, 2019.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.




Page 110



Report

Anchor Point Inspection Testing and Repair Services Agreement - Request for
Award (Ordinance S-48084)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with PK Industries LLC to provide Anchor Point Inspection Testing and Repair Services
for the purpose of conducting load-testing, inspections and repairs of the sockets and
surrounding matrix used for safety hoisting and tie-down. Further request to authorize
for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the
agreement will not exceed $1 million.

Summary
The purpose of the agreement is to conduct anchor point load-testing inspections and
repair of the sockets and surrounding matrix located throughout Water Services
Department buildings. All parts, control systems and safety requirements must be
inspected annually to ensure they are in safe operating condition, in accordance with
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements. OSHA
mandates that acceptable anchor points be in safe operating condition with the
capability of supporting 5,000 pounds of force per person tied to the device.

Procurement Information
The recommendation was made using an Invitation for Bid procurement process in
accordance with City of Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Four vendors submitted bids and are listed below. Three bids were found to be
responsive and responsible.

Selected Bidder
PK Industries LLC: $118,225

Other Bidders
Safeguard US, Inc.: $39,574
ASR Crane: $130,130
Gravitec Systems: $281,298




Page 111

Contract Term
The agreement will be for a five-year aggregate term beginning on Dec. 1, 2021.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for PK Industries LLC will not exceed a total aggregate value of
$1 million.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department Operating and Capital
Improvement Program budgets.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.




Page 112



Report

Final Plat - Broadstone Uptown - PLAT 210009 - Camelback Road East of 7th
Avenue

Plat: 210009
Project: 19-304
Name of Plat: Broadstone Uptown
Owner(s): CRP/AR Uptown Phx Owner, LLC
Engineer(s): David S. Klein, RLS
Request: A 1 Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: Oct. 4, 2021
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located at Camelback Road east of 7th Avenue.
Council District: 4

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 113



Report

Final Plat - Larkey Subdivision - PLAT 210037 - East of 23rd Avenue and North of
South Mountain Avenue

Plat: 210037
Project: 20-3374
Name of Plat: Larkey Subdivision
Owner(s): Cheryl B. Larkey Trust
Engineer(s): Michael A. Banta, RLS
Request: A 33 Lot Residential Plat
Reviewed by Staff: Oct. 4, 2021
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located approximately 660 feet east of 23rd Avenue, north of South
Mountain Avenue.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 114



Report

Map of Dedication - 59th & Baseline, LLC - MOD 210002 - Southeast Corner of
59th Avenue and Baseline Road

Map of Dedication: 210002
Project: 18-189
Name of MOD: 210002
Owner(s): 59th and Baseline, LLC
Engineer(s): Alliance Land Surveying
Request: Map of Dedication
Reviewed by Staff: Oct. 4, 2021
Final Map of Dedication requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above map of dedication be approved by the City Council and
certified by the City Clerk. Recording of the map of dedication dedicates the streets
and easements as shown to the public.

Location
Generally located at the southeast corner of 59th Avenue and Baseline Road.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 115



Report

Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-37-21-4 -
Approximately 207 Feet North of the Northeast Corner of 17th Avenue and Colter
Street (Ordinance G-6911)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
R-3 (Multifamily Residence District) to WU Code T4:2 SL (Walkable Urban Code,
Transect 4:2, Transit Solano Character Area) to allow multifamily residential.

Summary
Current Zoning: R-3
Proposed Zoning: WU Code T4:2 SL
Acreage: 0.50 acres
Proposed Use: Multifamily residential

Applicant: Ryker I, LLC/Scott Evans
Owner: Ryker I, LLC/Scott Evans
Representative: Withey Morris, PLC/William F. Allison

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Alhambra Village Planning Committee heard this case on Sept. 28,
2021 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 11-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Oct. 7, 2021 and
recommended approval, per the Alhambra Village Planning Committee
recommendation, with additional stipulations, by a vote of 9-0.

Location
Approximately 207 feet north of the northeast corner of 17th Avenue and Colter Street
Council District: 4
Parcel Address: 5223 N. 17th Ave.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning and
Development Department.



Page 116
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(Z-37-21-4) FROM R-3 (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT)
TO WU CODE T4:2 SL (WALKABLE URBAN CODE, TRANSECT
4:3, TRANSIT SOLANO CHARACTER AREA).

____________


BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 0.50-acre site located approximately 207 feet

north of the northeast corner of 17th Avenue and Colter Street, in a portion of Section

18, Township 2 North and Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A”, is

hereby changed from “R-3” (Multifamily Residence District) to “WU Code T4:2 SL”

(Walkable Urban Code, Transect 4:3, Transit Solano Character Area).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B”.

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,




Page 117
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any units beyond seven,
the developer shall detach the public sidewalk in compliance with Chapter
1312(E)(1)(c) of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance and provide a minimum 75
percent shade, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with the
creation of a comfortable pedestrian environment. If the site plan is modified in
accordance with Stipulation No. 4, the conditions of this stipulation shall be
superseded by the provisions of the Walkable Urban Code.

2. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any units beyond seven,
the developer shall provide secure bicycle parking for residents at a rate of
0.25 spaces per unit and Inverted-U style racks for 4 bicycles per the
installation requirements of Chapter 13 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. If the site plan is
modified in accordance with Stipulation No. 4, the conditions of this stipulation
shall be superseded by the provisions of the Walkable Urban Code.

3. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any units beyond seven,
all on-site pedestrian pathways and required amenity areas shall be shaded to
a minimum 50 percent through vegetative methods, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department. If the site plan is modified in
accordance with Stipulation No. 4, the conditions of this stipulation shall be
superseded by the provisions of the Walkable Urban Code.

4. A conceptual site plan and elevations shall be administratively approved by the
Planning Hearing Officer prior to preliminary site plan approval with specific
regard to the inclusion of the below elements for any expansion or modification
to the buildings on the site exceeding 10 percent from the site plan date
stamped June 11, 2021. This review is for conceptual purposes only. Specific
development standards and requirements will be determined by the Planning
and Development Department.

a. Shaded and detached sidewalks.

b. Frontage types oriented to 17th Avenue.

c. Maximum building setbacks of 15 feet along 17th Avenue.

d. Minimum building setbacks of 15 feet along the east property line.

5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping, and other incidentals, as per plans approved by


Page 118
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

6. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

7 Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 3rd day of November,

2021.



________________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


Page 119
_________________________
Jeff Barton, City Manager


Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 120
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-37-21-4

Located in the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 18, Township 2
North, Range 3 East, Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona.

Being a portion of Lot 5 & 6, Block 2 as shown on the Final Plat of Nile Tract, recorded
in Book 14, Page 9, Maricopa County Records;

Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Northeast Quarter, from which the
Southeast corner of said Northeast Quarter bears North 90°00’00” East;

Thence North 00°43'34" West, along the West line of said Northeast Quarter, a distance
of 224.94 feet to the Point of Beginning;

Thence continuing along said West line, North 00°43'34" West, a distance of 120.00
feet to a line which is coincident with the North line of the South half of said Lot 5 and 6;

Thence departing said West line, North 89°59'58" East, along said coincident line and
said North line a distance of 181.10 feet to the West line of the Final Plat for Colter
Close, recorded in Book 525, Page 9, Maricopa County Records;

Thence departing said North line, South 00°43'34" East, along last said West line, a
distance of 120.00 feet to the North line of that certain parcel of land as described in
Special Warranty Deed document number 2019- 0811644, Maricopa County Records;

Thence departing said West line, South 89°59'58" West, along last said North line, a
distance of 181.10 feet to the Point of Beginning.

Containing 21,730.25 square feet or 0.50 acres, more or less.




Page 121
Page 122



Report

Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-46-21-4 -
Approximately 240 Feet West of the Southwest Corner of 7th Street and Palm
Lane (Ordinance G-6910)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
C-O (Commercial Office) and P-1 (Parking District) to WU Code T4:3 MT (Walkable
Urban Code, Transect 4:3, Transit Midtown Character Area) to allow single-family
detached residences.

Summary
Current Zoning: C-O (Commercial Office) (0.71 acres) and P-1 (Parking District) (0.32
acres)
Proposed Zoning: WU Code T4:3 MT (Walkable Urban Code, Transect 4:3, Transit
Midtown Character Area)
Acreage: 1.03 acres
Proposed Use: Single-family detached residences.

Owner: Goldwater Institute
Applicant: David Kitnick, Rosewood Homes, LLC
Representative: George Pasquel, III, Withey Morris, PLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Encanto Village Planning Committee heard this case on Oct. 4, 2021
and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation with direction by a vote of
11-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Oct. 7, 2021 and
recommended approval, per the Encanto Village Planning Committee recommendation
with an additional stipulation by a vote of 9-0.

Location
Approximately 240 feet west of the southwest corner of 7th Street and Palm Lane
Council District: 4
Parcel Address: No address



Page 123

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 124
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(Z-46-21-4) FROM C-O (COMMERCIAL OFFICE) AND P-1
(PARKING DISTRICT) TO WU CODE T4:3 MT (WALKABLE
URBAN CODE, TRANSECT 4:3, TRANSIT MIDTOWN
CHARACTER AREA).

____________


BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 1.03 acre site located approximately 240 feet

west of the southwest corner of 7th Street and Palm Lane, in a portion of Section 32,

Township 2 North and Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A”, is

hereby changed from 0.71-acres of “C-O” (Commercial Office) and 0.32-acres of “P-1”

(Parking District) to WU Code T4:3 MT (Walkable Urban Code, Transect 4:3, Transit

Midtown Character Area).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B”.

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,


Page 125
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The mature California Fan Palms shall be preserved within the Palm Lane
right-of-way, as approved or modified by the Planning and Development
Department Landscape Architect. This stipulation shall not preclude the
relocation of mature California Fan Palms within the right-of-way.

2. The developer shall pave the alley per the local street standards from western
project boundary to 7th Street, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

3. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

4. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.

5. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.

6. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction
analysis review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

7. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

8. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the


Page 126
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 3rd day of November,

2021.



________________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeff Barton, City Manager


Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 127
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-46-21-4

LOT 1 OF “GOLDWATER INSTITUTE” AS RECORDED IN BOOK 516 OF MAPS,
PAGE 35 IN THE RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, COUNTY OF MARICOPA,
STATE OF ARIZONA ALSO BEING IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 3
EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA




Page 128
Page 129



Report

Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-36-21-6 -
Approximately 565 Feet South of the Southeast and Southwest Corners of 13th
Place and Colter Street (Ordinance G-6909)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
C-2 SP (Intermediate Commercial District, Special Permit) to R-3 (Multifamily
Residence District) to allow multifamily residential.

Summary
Current Zoning: C-2 SP (Intermediate Commercial District, Special Permit)
Proposed Zoning: R-3 (Multifamily Residence District)
Acreage: 0.27 acres
Proposal: Multifamily residential

Owner: Koppinger, Kantak, and Parks
Applicant: Bernard Jantak III and Elizabeth Y. Koppinger
Representative: William F. Allison, Withey Morris, PLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Camelback East Village Planning Committee heard this case on
Sept. 7, 2021 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of
13-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Oct. 7, 2021 and
recommended approval, per the Camelback East Village Planning Committee
recommendation with an additional stipulation, by a vote of 9-0.

Location
Approximately 565 feet south of the southeast and southwest corners of 13th Place
and Colter Street
Council District: 6
Parcel Address: 5122 and 5125 N. 13th Place

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning and
Development Department.

Page 130
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(CASE Z-36-21-6) FROM C-2 SP (INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT, SPECIAL PERMIT) TO R-3 (MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 0.27 acre site located approximately 565 feet

south of the southeast and southwest corners of 13th Place and Colter Street in a

portion of Section 16, Township 2 North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically

in Exhibit “A”, is hereby changed from “C-2 SP” (Intermediate Commercial District,

Special Permit) to “R-3” (Multifamily Residence District).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B”.

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,




Page 131
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

2. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

3. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 3rd day of November,

2021.



________________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney



Page 132
By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeff Barton, City Manager

Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 133
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-36-21-6

A PORTION OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 2N, RANGE 3E.

TRACT A OF THE FINAL PLAT OF ABC NISSAN EXPANSION, RECORDED AS
INSTRUMENT NO. 2005-0223440 IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, BOOK 731, PAGE 3.

TRACT B OF FINAL PLAT OF ABC NISSAN EXPANSION, RECORDED AS
INSTRUMENT NO. 2005-0223440 IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, BOOK 731, PAGE 3.




Page 134
Page 135



Report

Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-39-21-6 -
Approximately 180 Feet South of the Southeast Corner of 44th Street and
Clarendon Avenue (Ordinance G-6908)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
R1-10 (Single-Family Residence District) to R-O (Residential Office - Restricted
Commercial District) to allow an office.

Summary
Current Zoning: R1-10 (Single-Family Residence District)
Proposed Zoning: R-O (Residential Office - Restricted Commercial District)
Acreage: 0.48 acres
Proposal: Office

Applicant: Brent Nardecchia, High Place Investments, LLC
Owner: High Place Investments, LLC
Representative: Rod Jarvis, Earl & Curley, P.C.

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Camelback East Village Planning Committee heard this case on
Sept. 7, 2021 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of
14-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Oct. 7, 2021 and
recommended approval, per the Camelback East Village Planning Committee
recommendation with an additional stipulation, by a vote of 9-0.

Location
Approximately 180 feet south of the southeast corner of 44th Street and Clarendon
Avenue
Council District: 6
Parcel Address: 3609 N. 44th St.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning and
Development Department.

Page 136
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(CASE Z-39-21-6) FROM R1-10 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE
DISTRICT) TO R-O (RESIDENTIAL OFFICE – RESTRICTED
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 0.48 acre site located approximately 180 feet

south of the southeast corner of 44th Street and Clarendon Avenue in a portion of

Section 30, Township 2 North, Range 4 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit

“A”, is hereby changed from “R1-10” (Single-Family Residence District) to “R-O”

(Residential Office – Restricted Commercial District).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B”.

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,




Page 137
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the elevations date
stamped June 14, 2021, as modified by the following stipulations and approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

2. The public sidewalk along 44th Street shall be detached with a landscape strip
located between the sidewalk and back of curb following the most recent Cross
Section of the Street Classification Map and planted to the following standards,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees that provide a minimum 75 percent
shade at maturity.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation maintained at a maximum mature height of 24
inches and achieve minimum 75 percent live coverage.

3. A minimum 20-foot landscape setback shall be required adjacent to 44th Street
and shall include large canopy shade trees 20 feet on center or in equivalent
groupings between the sidewalk and proposed site development, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department. Twenty-five percent of the trees
shall be minimum four-inch caliper and 75 percent of the trees shall be minimum
three-inch caliper. Five, five-gallon shrubs per tree, and additional shrubs or live
groundcover, shall provide minimum 75 percent live cover at mature size, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

4. A minimum 4-foot landscape setback shall be required along the eastern
property line. This setback shall be planted with minimum 8-foot-tall shrubs or
plants to provide a tall vegetative buffer from adjacent single-family residences
to the east, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

5. All uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with minimum 2-
inch caliper drought-tolerant shade trees. Landscaping shall be dispersed
throughout the parking area and achieve 25 percent shade at maturity, as
approved by Planning and Development Department. Shade may be provided
with a combination of trees and structural shade.

6. There shall be no internally lit signs on the site. Signage shall be approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

7. A minimum of four bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U
and/or artistic racks located near building entrances and installed per the
requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department. Artistic racks shall adhere to the
Master Plan.


Page 138
8. Clearly defined, accessible pedestrian pathways shall be provided to connect
building entrances and public sidewalks, using the most direct route for
pedestrians, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

9. Where pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles, they shall be constructed of
decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments
that visually contrast with the adjacent parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

10. Trees shall be placed to provide 75 percent shade coverage on all pedestrian
paths and sidewalks at full maturity, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. Shade structures may be used to meet the shade
requirement in places where trees are unable to be located.

11. The developer shall record a cross-access agreement for any shared access
drives along 44th Street.

12. The developer shall dedicate a 10-foot sidewalk easement and construct a
minimum 5-foot-wide sidewalk and landscape strip along 44th Street, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

13. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, landscaping and
other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with the current ADA Guidelines.

14. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

15. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition
207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa
County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.




Page 139
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 3rd day of November,

2021.



________________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeff Barton, City Manager

Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 140
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-39-21-6

TRACT ‘A’ OF RANCHO VENTURA PER MCR 60-37
3609 N. 44TH STREETT, PHOENIX, AZ 85018

SITUATED IN SECTION 30, T.2N., R.4E., OF THE G&S.R.B.&M.,
CITY OF PHOENIX, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA




Page 141
Page 142



Report

Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-15-21-7 -
Southeast Corner of 67th Avenue and Broadway Road (Ordinance G-6912)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
S-1 (Approved C-1) (Ranch or Farm Residence District, Approved Neighborhood
Retail District) and S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence District) to C-2 (Intermediate
Commercial District) to allow commercial uses. This is a companion case to Z-SP-1-21
-7 and should be heard first, followed by Z-SP-1-21-7.

Summary
Current Zoning: S-1 (Approved C-1) (7.26 acres) and S-1 (0.37 acres)
Proposed Zoning: C-2
Acreage: 7.63 acres
Proposed Use: Commercial uses

Applicant: EAPC Architects Engineers, Michelle Bach
Owner: STORAGExperts at 6649 West Broadway, LLC
Representative: EAPC Architects Engineers, Michelle Bach

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Estrella Village Planning Committee was scheduled to hear this case
on Sept. 21, 2021. No recommendation was made due to a lack of quorum.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Oct. 7, 2021 and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation with an additional stipulation,
by a vote of 9-0.

Location
Southeast corner of 67th Avenue and Broadway Road
Council District: 7
Parcel Address: 6649 W. Broadway Road

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning and
Development Department.


Page 143
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(CASE Z-15-21-7) FROM S-1 (APPROVED C-1) (RANCH OR
FARM RESIDENCE DISTRICT, APPROVED NEIGHBORHOOD
RETAIL DISTRICT) AND S-1 (RANCH OR FARM RESIDENCE
DISTRICT) TO C-2 (INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 7.63-acre site located at the southeast

corner of 67th Avenue and Broadway Road in a portion of Section 30, Township 1

North, Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A”, is hereby changed

from 7.26 acres of “S-1 (Approved C-1)” (Ranch or Farm Residence District, Approved

Neighborhood Retail District) and 0.37-acres of “S-1” (Ranch or Farm Residence

District) to “C-2” (Intermediate Commercial District).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B”.




Page 144
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date
stamped July 26, 2021, except as noted in the stipulations, and approved by
the Planning and Development Department. Additionally, if the existing water
and sewer easement along 67th Avenue is not approved to be abandoned
through a separate process, the western portion of Building C, within the self-
storage portion of the site, must be modified to remove the building from the
easement.

2. Buildings A through C shall be in general conformance with the building
elevations date stamped July 26, 2021. Building elevations for Building Pads A
and B as depicted in the conceptual site plan dated July 26, 2021, shall be
developed to the following standards, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department:

a. Building elevations shall contain multiple colors, exterior accent
materials and textural changes that exhibit quality and durability such as
brick, stone, colored textured concrete or stucco, or other materials to
provide a decorative and aesthetic treatment.

b. Building elevations adjacent and oriented to public streets, shall contain
a minimum of 25 percent brick, masonry, stone or another exterior
accent material that exhibits quality and durability.

c. All building elevations shall contain architectural embellishments and
detailing such as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, variation
in window size and location, and/or overhang canopies.

d. Pitched roofs, elements or facades shall be incorporated in all buildings.

3. The development shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street
Landscaping Program landscape palette and landscaping standards along
arterial streets in the Estrella Village, except as otherwise noted herein, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

4. A minimum 500-square foot landscaped accent area shall be provided at the
corner of 67th Avenue and Broadway Road. The landscaped accent area shall
provide a visually unique character with drought-tolerant plant materials
providing seasonal interest and 75 percent live cover, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.



Page 145
5. Evergreen trees shall be planted within the landscape setbacks along the south
and east perimeter of the site, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

6. All perimeter walls visible from the streets shall include material and textural
differences, such as stucco and/or split face block with a decorative element,
such as tile or stamped designs, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

7. All uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with minimum 2-
inch caliper size large canopy drought tolerant shade trees. Landscaping shall
be dispersed throughout the parking area and achieve 25 percent shade at
maturity, as approved by Planning and Development Department.

8. The following pedestrian shade standards shall be met as described below and
as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department:

a. The bus stop along Broadway Road shall be shaded to a minimum of 50
percent;

b. Pedestrian walkways connecting the commercial buildings to adjacent
public sidewalks shall be shaded to a minimum of 75 percent using large
canopy drought tolerant shade trees at maturity and/or architectural
shade;

c. The multi-use trail (MUT) along 67th Avenue shall be shaded to a
minimum 50 percent by vegetative shade at maturity.

9. A system of pedestrian thoroughfares shall be provided, as described below
and as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department:

a. Connections between the following via the most direct route:

(1) All building entrances.

(2) Adjacent public sidewalks.

(3) The bus stop along Broadway Road.

b. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall
be constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or
other pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle
surfaces. Vehicular crossings shall be kept to a minimum.

10. The development shall incorporate bicycle infrastructure, as described below
and as approved by the Planning and Development Department.




Page 146
a. A minimum of four bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through
Inverted U and/or artistic racks located near the main building entrances
of Building A, Pad A and Pad B as depicted in the conceptual site plan
dated July 26, 2021 and installed per the requirements of Section
1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department. Artistic racks shall adhere to the City of
Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle
Master Plan.

b. One bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided and
maintained within close proximity to building Pad A, as depicted in the
conceptual site plan date stamped July 26, 2021. The bicycle repair
station (“fix it station”) shall be provided in an area of high visibility and
separated from vehicular maneuvering areas, where applicable. The
repair station shall include: standard repair tools affixed to the station; a
tire gauge and pump affixed to the base of the station or the ground; and
a bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin freely
while making adjustments to the bike.

11. The developer shall dedicate a 30-foot wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE)
along the east side of 67th Avenue and construct a minimum 10-foot wide
multi-use trail (MUT) within the easement, in accordance with the MAG
supplemental detail indicated in Section 429 and as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

12. The Public Transit Department requests dedication of right-of-way and
construction one bus bay with an attached bus stop pad along eastbound
Broadway Road east of 67th Avenue. The bus bay shall be constructed
according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1256. The attached bus stop
pad shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1261
with a minimum depth of 10 feet. The bus stop pad shall be spaced from the
intersection of 67th Avenue and Broadway Road according to City of Phoenix
Standard Detail P1258, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

13. All sidewalks along 67th Avenue and Broadway Road shall be detached with a
landscape strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb following the
most recent Cross Section of the Street Classification Map and planted to the
following standards, as approved and/or modified by the Planning and
Development Department and/or Maricopa County Department of
Transportation (MCDOT).

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant shade
trees to provide a minimum 75 percent shade.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation maintained no higher than 24 inches to
provide a minimum of 75 percent live coverage at maturity.



Page 147
c. The landscape palette and planting standards, unless otherwise
provided herein, shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street
Landscaping Program requirements for arterial streets.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

14. The developer shall dedicate 55 feet of right-of-way for the south side of
Broadway Road, as approved by the Planning and Development Department
and/or Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT).

15. The developer shall dedicate 55 feet of right-of-way for the east half of 67th
Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department and/or
Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT).

16. The developer shall construct a 14-foot-wide landscaped median island along
67th Avenue, as approved by the Street Transportation Department and/or
Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT).

17. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Study, including a Traffic Signal
Warrant Analysis, to the City for this development. No preliminary approval of
plans shall be granted until the study is reviewed and approved by the City.
Contact the Street Transportation Department, to set up a meeting to discuss
the requirements of the study. Upon completion of the TIS the developer shall
submit the completed TIS to the Planning and Development Department
counter with instruction to forward the study to the Street Transportation
Department, Office of the City Engineer.

18. If the approved Traffic Impact Study with signal warrant analysis recommends
deferring signal installation to a future volume condition, provide conduit and
junction boxes at the southeast corner of 67th Avenue and Broadway Road.
The developer shall provide 25 percent of the cost of the future traffic signal in
an escrow account with the Street Transportation Department. Contact the
Street Transportation Department to set up an account. If the TIS recommends
the installation of the signal with this development, the developer shall install
the signal, at their expense.

19. All street improvements outside of the Phoenix City Limits shall be reviewed
and approved by Maricopa County. Provide documentation of county approval
prior to preliminary site plan submittal, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

20. A Red Border letter shall be processed for this development, as determined by
the Planning and Development Department.

21. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,


Page 148
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

22. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development(s) the existence and
operational characteristics of a dairy farm (west) and roping/rodeo arena
(north). The form and content of such documents shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Attorney.

23. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

24. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase
I data testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archeological data recovery excavations.

25. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.

26. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 3rd day of November,

2021.


________________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:


Page 149
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeff Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 150
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-15-21-7


The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 1 North,
Range 2 East of the G&SRB&M, except the South 30 feet of the East 100 feet and
except the East 30 feet of the North 270 feet of the South 300 feet for ditch purposes,
and except the North 40 feet and the West 33 feet for roads; and

The Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 1 North,
Range 2 East of the G&SRB&M, except the North 40 feet for roads;

EXCEPT any portion of Parcels 1 and 2 conveyed by Grantor to D. R. Horton, Inc. -
Dietz-Crane pursuant to Special Warranty Deed recorded as Instrument No. 2004-
1498119, Records of Maricopa County, Arizona.




Page 151
Page 152



Report

Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-SP-1-21-7 -
Southeast Corner of 67th Avenue and Broadway Road (Ordinance G-6913)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
from S-1 (Approved C-1) (Ranch or Farm Residence District, Approved Neighborhood
Retail District), Pending C-2 (Intermediate Commercial District) and S-1 (Ranch or
Farm Residence District), Pending C-2 (Intermediate Commercial District) to C-2 SP
(Intermediate Commercial, Special Permit District) to allow a self-service storage
warehouse and underlying commercial uses. This is a companion case to Z-15-21-7
and should be heard/ratified after Z-15-21-7.

Summary
Current Zoning: S-1 (Approved C-1) (Pending C-2) (7.26 acres) and S-1 (Pending C-2)
(0.37 acres)
Proposed Zoning: C-2 SP
Acreage: 7.63 acres
Proposed Use: Self-service storage warehouse and underlying commercial uses

Applicant: EAPC Architects Engineers, Michelle Bach
Owner: STORAGExperts at 6649 West Broadway, LLC
Representative: EAPC Architects Engineers, Michelle Bach

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Estrella Village Planning Committee was scheduled to hear this case
on Sept. 21, 2021. No recommendation was made due to a lack of quorum.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Oct. 7, 2021 and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation with an additional stipulation,
by a vote of 9-0.

Location
Southeast corner of 67th Avenue and Broadway Road
Council District: 7
Parcel Address: 6649 W. Broadway Road



Page 153

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 154
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(CASE Z-SP-21-7) FROM S-1, APPROVED C-1 (PENDING C-2)
(RANCH OR FARM RESIDENCE DISTRICT, APPROVED
NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL DISTRICT, PENDING INTERMEDIATE
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) AND S-1 (PENDING C-2) (RANCH OR
FARM RESIDENCE DISTRICT, PENDING INTERMEDIATE
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) TO C-2 SP (INTERMEDIATE
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, SPECIAL PERMIT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 7.63-acre site located at the southeast

corner of 67th Avenue and Broadway Road in a portion of Section 30, Township 1

North, Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A”, is hereby changed

from 7.26 acres of “S-1, Approved C-1, Pending C-2” (Ranch or Farm Residence

District, Approved Neighborhood Retail District, Pending Intermediate Commercial

District) and 0.37-acres of “S-1, Pending C-2” (Ranch or Farm Residence District,

Pending Intermediate Commercial District) to “C-2 SP” (Intermediate Commercial




Page 155
district, Special Permit) to allow a self-service storage warehouse and underlying

commercial uses.

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B”.

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date
stamped July 26, 2021, except as noted in the stipulations, and approved by
the Planning and Development Department. Additionally, if the existing water
and sewer easement along 67th Avenue is not approved to be abandoned
through a separate process, the western portion of Building C, within the self-
storage portion of the site, must be modified to remove the building from the
easement.

2. Buildings A through C shall be in general conformance with the building
elevations date stamped July 26, 2021. Building elevations for Building Pads A
and B as depicted in the conceptual site plan date stamped July 26, 2021, shall
be developed to the following standards, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department:

a. Building elevations shall contain multiple colors, exterior accent
materials and textural changes that exhibit quality and durability such as
brick, stone, colored textured concrete or stucco, or other materials to
provide a decorative and aesthetic treatment.

b. Building elevations adjacent and oriented to public streets, shall contain
a minimum of 25 percent brick, masonry, stone or another exterior
accent material that exhibits quality and durability.

c. All building elevations shall contain architectural embellishments and
detailing such as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, variation
in window size and location, and/or overhang canopies.

d. Pitched roofs, elements or facades shall be incorporated in all buildings.




Page 156
3. The development shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street
Landscaping Program landscape palette and landscaping standards along
arterial streets in the Estrella Village, except as otherwise noted herein, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

4. A minimum 500-square foot landscaped accent area shall be provided at the
corner of 67th Avenue and Broadway Road. The landscaped accent area shall
provide a visually unique character with drought-tolerant plant materials
providing seasonal interest and 75 percent live cover, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

5. Evergreen trees shall be planted within the landscape setbacks along the south
and east perimeter of the site, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

6. All perimeter walls visible from the streets shall include material and textural
differences, such as stucco and/or split face block with a decorative element,
such as tile or stamped designs, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

7. All uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with minimum 2-
inch caliper size large canopy drought tolerant shade trees. Landscaping shall
be dispersed throughout the parking area and achieve 25 percent shade at
maturity, as approved by Planning and Development Department.

8. The following pedestrian shade standards shall be met as described below and
as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department:

a. The bus stop along Broadway Road shall be shaded to a minimum of 50
percent;

b. Pedestrian walkways connecting the commercial buildings to adjacent
public sidewalks shall be shaded to a minimum of 75 percent using
large canopy drought tolerant shade trees at maturity and/or
architectural shade;

c. The multi-use trail (MUT) along 67th Avenue shall be shaded to a
minimum 50 percent by vegetative shade at maturity.

9. A system of pedestrian thoroughfares shall be provided, as described below
and as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department:

a. Connections between the following via the most direct route:

(1) All building entrances.

(2) Adjacent public sidewalks.



Page 157
(3) The bus stop along Broadway Road.

b. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall
be constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or
other pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive
aisle surfaces. Vehicular crossings shall be kept to a minimum.

10. The development shall incorporate bicycle infrastructure, as described below
and as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. A minimum of four bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through
Inverted U and/or artistic racks located near the main building entrances
of Building A, Pad A and Pad B as depicted in the conceptual site plan
dated July 26, 2021 and installed per the requirements of Section
1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department. Artistic racks shall adhere to the City of
Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle
Master Plan.

b. One bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided and
maintained within close proximity to building Pad A, as depicted in the
conceptual site plan date stamped July 26, 2021. The bicycle repair
station (“fix it station”) shall be provided in an area of high visibility and
separated from vehicular maneuvering areas, where applicable. The
repair station shall include: standard repair tools affixed to the station; a
tire gauge and pump affixed to the base of the station or the ground;
and a bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin freely
while making adjustments to the bike.

11. The developer shall dedicate a 30-foot wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE)
along the east side of 67th Avenue and construct a minimum 10-foot wide
multi-use trail (MUT) within the easement, in accordance with the MAG
supplemental detail indicated in Section 429 and as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

12. The Public Transit Department requests dedication of right-of-way and
construction one bus bay with an attached bus stop pad along eastbound
Broadway Road east of 67th Avenue. The bus bay shall be constructed
according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1256. The attached bus stop
pad shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1261
with a minimum depth of 10 feet. The bus stop pad shall be spaced from the
intersection of 67th Avenue and Broadway Road according to City of Phoenix
Standard Detail P1258, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

13. All sidewalks along 67th Avenue and Broadway Road shall be detached with a
landscape strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb following the
most recent Cross Section of the Street Classification Map and planted to the


Page 158
following standards, as approved and/or modified by the Planning and
Development Department and/or Maricopa County Department of
Transportation (MCDOT).

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant
shade trees to provide a minimum 75 percent shade.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation maintained no higher than 24 inches to
provide a minimum of 75 percent live coverage at maturity.

c. The landscape palette and planting standards, unless otherwise
provided herein, shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street
Landscaping Program requirements for arterial streets.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

14. The developer shall dedicate 55 feet of right-of-way for the south side of
Broadway Road, as approved by the Planning and Development Department
and/or Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT).

15. The developer shall dedicate 55 feet of right-of-way for the east half of 67th
Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department and/or
Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT).

16. The developer shall construct a 14-foot-wide landscaped median island along
67th Avenue, as approved by the Street Transportation Department and/or
Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT).

17. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Study, including a Traffic Signal
Warrant Analysis, to the City for this development. No preliminary approval of
plans shall be granted until the study is reviewed and approved by the City.
Contact the Street Transportation Department, to set up a meeting to discuss
the requirements of the study. Upon completion of the TIS the developer shall
submit the completed TIS to the Planning and Development Department
counter with instruction to forward the study to the Street Transportation
Department, Office of the City Engineer.

18. If the approved Traffic Impact Study with signal warrant analysis recommends
deferring signal installation to a future volume condition, provide conduit and
junction boxes at the southeast corner of 67th Avenue and Broadway Road.
The developer shall provide 25 percent of the cost of the future traffic signal in
an escrow account with the Street Transportation Department. Contact the
Street Transportation Department to set up an account. If the TIS recommends
the installation of the signal with this development, the developer shall install
the signal, at their expense.



Page 159
19. All street improvements outside of the Phoenix City Limits shall be reviewed
and approved by Maricopa County. Provide documentation of county approval
prior to preliminary site plan submittal, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

20. A Red Border letter shall be processed for this development, as determined by
the Planning and Development Department.

21. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

22. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development(s) the existence and
operational characteristics of a dairy farm (west) and roping/rodeo arena
(north). The form and content of such documents shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Attorney.

23. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

24. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase
I data testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archeological data recovery excavations.

25. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.

26. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.


Page 160
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 3rd day of November,

2021.


________________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeff Barton, City Manager


Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 161
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-SP-1-21-7


The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 1 North,
Range 2 East of the G&SRB&M, except the South 30 feet of the East 100 feet and
except the East 30 feet of the North 270 feet of the South 300 feet for ditch purposes,
and except the North 40 feet and the West 33 feet for roads; and

The Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 1 North,
Range 2 East of the G&SRB&M, except the North 40 feet for roads;

EXCEPT any portion of Parcels 1 and 2 conveyed by Grantor to D. R. Horton, Inc. -
Dietz-Crane pursuant to Special Warranty Deed recorded as Instrument No. 2004-
1498119, Records of Maricopa County, Arizona.




Page 162
Page 163



Report

Public Hearing and Ordinance Adoption - Amend City Code - Rezoning
Application Z-41-21-7 - Approximately 615 Feet North of the Northwest Corner of
59th Avenue and Dobbins Road (Ordinance G-6915)

Request to hold a public hearing on a proposal to amend the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning
Application Z-41-21-7 and rezone the site from S-1 (Approved C-2 or CP/GCP) (Ranch
or Farm Residence District, Approved Intermediate Commercial District or Commerce
Park District, General Commerce Park Option) to C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR
(Intermediate Commercial District, Height Waiver, Density Waiver) to allow a
multifamily residential development with a height and density waiver.

Summary
Current Zoning: S-1 (Approved C-2 or CP/GCP) (Ranch or Farm Residence District,
Approved Intermediate Commercial District or Commerce Park District, General
Commerce Park Option)
Proposed Zoning: C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR (Intermediate Commercial District, Height
Waiver, Density Waiver)
Acreage: 14.56 acres
Proposal: Multifamily residential development with a height and density waiver

Owner: The Williams Family Living 1996 Trust
Applicant: Anne Healy, P.B. Bell
Representative: Manjula M. Vaz, Gammage & Burnham, PLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Laveen Village Planning Committee heard this case on Sept. 13,
2021 and recommended denial, by a vote of 8-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Oct. 7, 2021 and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation with additional stipulations, by a
vote of 7-1.
The Planning Commission recommendation was appealed on Oct. 8, 2021.

Location
Approximately 615 feet north of the northwest corner of 59th Avenue and Dobbins


Page 164

Road
Council District: 7
Parcel Address: N/A

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 165
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(CASE Z-41-21-7) FROM S-1 (APPROVED C-2 or CP/GCP)
(RANCH OR FARM RESIDENCE DISTRICT, APPROVED
INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OR COMMERCE
PARK DISTRICT, GENERAL COMMERCE PARK OPTION) TO C-
2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR (INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT, HEIGHT WAIVER, DENSITY WAIVER).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 14.56-acre site located approximately 615

feet north of the northwest corner of 59th Avenue and Dobbins Road in a portion of

Section 6, Township 1 South, Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit

“A”, is hereby changed from “S-1 (Approved C-2 or CP/GCP)” (Ranch or Farm

Residence District, Approved Intermediate Commercial District or Commerce Park

District, General Commerce Park Option) to C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR (Intermediate

Commercial District, Height Waiver, Density Waiver).




Page 166
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B”.

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan and
elevations date stamped August 30, 2021, as modified by the following
stipulations and approved by the Planning and Development Department.

2. The buildings along 59th Avenue, as depicted on the site plan date stamped
August 31, 2021, shall not exceed a maximum height of 2 stories and 30 feet.
Other buildings on the site shall not exceed a maximum height of 3 stories and 40
feet.

3. The developer shall construct a 10-foot-wide public Shared Use Path (SUP)
along 59th Avenue, which shall be detached with a landscape strip located
between the sidewalk and back of curb following the most recent Cross Section
of the Street Classification Map. The landscape area between the sidewalk and
back of curb shall be planted to the following standards, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees that provide a minimum 75 percent
shade at maturity.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation maintained at a maximum height of 24 inches
and achieve 75 percent live coverage.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

4. A minimum landscape setback of 30 feet shall be required along 59th Avenue
and shall be planted with minimum 50 percent 3-inch caliper, 50 percent 4-inch
caliper large canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on center or in equivalent
groupings, and five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, and 75 percent live groundcover, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. Where utility conflicts
exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and Development Department
on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian environment.



Page 167
5. The required landscape setback along the interior property lines shall be planted
with minimum 2-inch caliper trees at 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings,
and 75 percent live groundcover at maturity, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

6. The primary vehicular entrance to the development shall include the following
elements, as approved by the Planning and Development Department:

a. Pedestrian pathway connecting the interior of the development to the
public sidewalk and shall be constructed of bricks, pavers, or similar
material.

b. The pedestrian pathway shall be detached from the vehicular driveway
and lined with landscape areas on both sides of not less than 5 feet each.
The landscape area shall be planted with drought-tolerant plant materials
providing seasonal interest and 75 percent live cover.

c. A mix of ornamental trees (no less than 2-inch caliper), shrubs (no less
than five five-gallon shrubs per tree) and flower beds that will maintain a
constant bloom throughout the year and 75 percent live cover, shall be
provided along both sides of the entryway and within a landscaped median
of no less than 5 feet in width.

d. The driveway surface shall be constructed of decorative pavers, stamped
or colored concrete, or another material, other than those used to pave the
parking surfaces, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

7. Open view wrought iron fencing or a combination of maximum two feet of solid
masonry topped by wrought iron open view fencing shall be utilized along
pedestrian and vehicular entryway areas, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

8. Walls along the perimeter of the site shall include material and textural
differences, such as stucco and/or split face block with a decorative element,
such as tile or stamped designs, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

9. Decorative rail or similar fencing elements shall be provided along 59th Avenue,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

10. The development shall provide a minimum of 18 percent of open space. A
minimum of three district open space areas shall be provided as depicted on the
site plan date stamped August 30, 2021. Additionally, three benches or seating
features shall be provided throughout the development within shaded areas. One
of the benches or seating features shall be located within close proximity to the
primary entryway along 59th Avenue.



Page 168
11. A central amenity and open space area shall be provided within close proximity to
the primary vehicular entrance into the development, and include the following
amenities at a minimum, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department:

a. Swimming pool;

b. Clubhouse.

12. No more than 50 percent of the landscape areas within common areas or 10
percent of the net lot area, whichever is less, should be planted in turf or high-
water use plants. Turf areas should be located only in the common open space
areas, including retention basins, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

13. A system of pedestrian thoroughfares shall be provided at a minimum, as
described below and as approved or modified by the Planning and Development
Department:

a. Pathways shall be illuminated by pedestrian scale lighting per Section
1304(H)5.

b. Where pedestrian pathways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle
surfaces. Vehicular crossings shall be kept to a minimum.

14. Active open space areas, with the exception of the pool, shall be shaded a
minimum of 75 percent using architectural shade and/or shade trees at full
maturity, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

15. Pedestrian paths internal within the site and connecting the public sidewalk shall
be shaded to a minimum of 75 percent using architectural shade and/or shade
trees at full maturity, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

16. All uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with a minimum 2-
inch caliper drought-tolerant shade trees. Landscaping shall be dispersed
throughout the parking areas and achieve 25 percent shade at maturity, as
approved by Planning and Development Department.

17. The development shall incorporate bicycle infrastructure as described below and
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum of four bicycle parking spaces via inverted U-bicycle racks,
artistic style bicycle racks or “Outdoor/Covered Facilities” shall be located
near the vehicular entryway into the development or nearby amenity
areas. All bicycle racks shall adhere to Appendix K of the Comprehensive
Bicycle Master Plan.


Page 169
b. Secure bicycle parking for residents shall be provided at a minimum rate of
0.25 spaces per residential unit, with a maximum of 50 spaces, and shall
adhere to the standards in Section 1307.H of the Zoning Ordinance.

c. One bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided and maintained
within close proximity to the primary vehicular entryway to the
development. The bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided in
an area of high visibility and separated from vehicular maneuvering areas,
where applicable. The repair station shall include: standard repair tools
affixed to the station; a tire gauge and pump affixed to the base of the
station or the ground; and a bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and
wheels to spin freely while making adjustments to the bike.

18. The developer shall provide traffic calming measures at all vehicular points of
ingress and egress to slow vehicles departing the development and crossing the
public sidewalks, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

19. The developer shall dedicate minimum 55 feet of right-of-way for the west half of
59th Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

20. The developer shall construct and landscape a 14-foot-wide median island along
59th Avenue from Siesta Way to the northern edge of the development. A median
opening shall be provided at 59th Avenue and Siesta Way for full access while
the northern access shall be restricted to right-in/right-out only by the median
island, as depicted on the site plan date stamped August 30, 2021 and as
approved by the Street Transportation Department.

21. The developer shall construct a detached sidewalk and minimum 13-foot-wide
landscape area located between the back of curb and sidewalk as required by
the CM Cross Section along the west side of 59th Avenue, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

22. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is
reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall include signal warrant analysis
for the intersections of 59th Avenue and Dobbins Road and 59th Avenue and
South Mountain Boulevard. The developer shall be responsible for any additional
dedications and construction and/or contribute funds in escrow for the traffic
signals, as required by the approved TIS.

23. Existing irrigation facilities along any existing and or proposed right-of-way shall
be either removed from city right-of-way or undergrounded and relocated outside
of City right-of-way. Contact SRP to identify existing land rights and establish the
appropriate process to remove or relocate the facility. Relocations that require
additional dedications or land transfer, require completion prior to obtaining plat
and or civil plan review approval.



Page 170
24. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

25. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

26. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

27. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

28. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition
207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa
County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

29. A minimum of one pedestrian connection shall be provided within the west 600
feet of the property, along the south side, to allow access between the site and
any future development to the south, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 3rd day of November,

2021.



________________________________
MAYOR


Page 171
ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeff Barton, City Manager

Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 172
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-41-21-8

THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 1
SOUTH, RANGE 2 EAST, OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;

EXCEPT THE EAST 33.00 FEET THEREOF; AND

THE SOUTH 663.17 FEET THEREOF; AND

EXCEPT THE NORTH 1304.13 FEET THEREOF; AND

EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF ARIZONA,
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTION, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN
SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED, RECORDED JANUARY 9, 2019 AS 2019-0016336, OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS AND RE-RECORDED JUNE 07, 2019 AS 2019-0426519,
RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.




Page 173
Page 174
Attachment B




Staff Report: Z-41-21-7
September 10, 2021

Laveen Village Planning Committee September 13, 2021
Meeting Date
Planning Commission Hearing Date October 7, 2021

Request From: S-1 (Approved C-2/CP-GCP) (14.56 acres)
Request To: C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR (14.56 acres)
Proposed Use Multifamily residential with a height and density
waiver
Location Approximately 615 feet north of the northwest
corner of 59th Avenue and Dobbins Road
Owner The Williams Family Living 1996 Trust
Applicant Anne Healy, P.B. Bell
Representative Manjula M. Vaz, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff Recommendation Approval, subject to stipulations


General Plan Conformity
General Plan Land Use Map
Commercial
Designation
Street Map
59th Avenue Arterial 33-foot west half street
Classification
CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; CORES, CENTERS AND
CORRIDORS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Locate land uses with the greatest height
and most intense uses within village cores, centers and corridors based on
village character, land use needs, and transportation system capacity.
The proposed development consists of high density multifamily residential housing on a
site located within the Laveen Village Core, which is intended to be the clearly
identifiable focus for the village. The proposed intensity is appropriate within the core
and due to the site’s adjacency to the Loop 202 Freeway.




Page 175
Staff Report: Z-41-21-7
September 10, 2021



CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES & NEIGHBORHOODS CORE VALUE;
CERTAINTY & CHARACTER; DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Create new development or
redevelopment that is sensitive to the scale and character of the surrounding
neighborhoods and incorporates adequate development standards to prevent
negative impact(s) on the residential properties.
The proposed development incorporates an enhanced landscape buffer along its 59th
Avenue frontage and restricts buildings to a maximum two-story height along this
frontage. These will provide an appropriate transition from the single-family residential
neighborhood adjacent to the east, to the proposed three-story buildings along the
freeway to the west.
BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES AND SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new
development and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.
As stipulated, the development will provide mature shade trees along its 59th Avenue
frontage, throughout the surface parking areas, and in open space areas.


Applicable Plan, Overlays, and Initiatives
Laveen Southwest Growth Study – See Background Item No. 4.

Housing Phoenix – See Background Item No. 7.

Tree and Shade Master Plan – See Background Item No. 8.

Complete Streets Guiding Principles – See Background Item No. 9.

Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan – See Background Item No. 10.

Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning
Land Use Zoning
On Site Agricultural land S-1 (Approved C-2/C-GCP)
North Agricultural land S-1 (Approved C-2/C-GCP)
South Agricultural land S-1 (Approved C-2/C-GCP)
East Single-family
R1-8
residential subdivision




Page 176
Staff Report: Z-41-21-7
September 10, 2021


West (Across C-2 H-R SP (App. C-2/CP-GCP), C-2/CP-
Dairy farm and
Loop 202 GCP SP (App. C-2/CP-GCP), C-2 H-R (App.
agricultural land
freeway) C-2/CP-GCP) and S-1 (App. C-2/CP-GCP)

R-5 Multifamily Residential
(Planned Residential Development Option) *
Standards Requirements Proposed
Gross Acreage - 14.65 acres
Max. Total Number of 669, 764 with bonus 308 units (Met)
Units
Max. Density 45.68; 52.20 with bonus 21.02 (Met)
(dwelling units/acre)
Standards
Building Height 4 stories or 48 feet 3 stories, 37 feet (Met)
Maximum***
Lot Coverage 50% Maximum 32% (Met)
Open Space 5% Minimum of gross 18% (Met)
area
(Per Section 703.B)
Minimum Parking 474 required 606 provided (Met)
Minimum Building Setbacks
Perimeter Standards 20 feet adjacent to a Front (59th Avenue): 30 feet
public street (Met)***

10 feet adjacent to Interior property lines (north
property line and south): 15 feet (Met)
Minimum Landscape 20 feet adjacent to streets 30 feet (59th Avenue) (Met)
Setbacks
5 feet adjacent to 15 feet interior property lines
property lines (Met)
* The C-2 zoning district permits multifamily zoning by right within the development
parameters of the R-3 zoning district. Increased yard, height, area, and density may be
permitted through a waiver up to the R-5 standards.

**If variance required.

***The height limitation of 4 stories or 48 feet applies to residential uses.




Page 177
Staff Report: Z-41-21-7
September 10, 2021


Background/Issues/Analysis

SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone a
14.56-acre site located
approximately 615 feet north
of the northwest corner of
59th Avenue and Dobbins
Road from S-1 (Approved C-
2/CP-GCP) (Ranch or Farm
Residence District, Approved
Intermediate Commercial
District or Commerce Park
District, General Commerce
Park Option) to C-2
HGT/WVR DNS/WVR
(Intermediate Commercial
District, Height Waiver,
Density Waiver) to allow a
multifamily residential
development.
Aerial Map
Source: City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department

2. The site has a General Plan
Land Use Map designation of
Commercial. The same
designation exists to the
south and west of the site.
North of the subject site is a
Mixed Use (Commercial /
Commerce – Business Park)
designation. East of the site,
across 59th Avenue, is the
Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling
units per acre designation.

The proposal is consistent
with the Commercial General
Plan Land Use Map
designation as the
commercial land use
designation accommodates

General Plan Land Use Map
Source: City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department



Page 178
Staff Report: Z-41-21-7
September 10, 2021


multifamily
development at varying
scales and intensities.

The site is also located
within the Laveen
Village Core, which is
intended to be the
clearly identifiable
central focus for the
village with a
pedestrian-oriented mix
of land uses. This
proposal will be the first
development within the
Laveen Village Core,
as all properties within
these boundaries are
currently used for
agricultural operations.
The proposal will provide General Plan Land Use Map
Source: City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department
high density housing
within the core and
adjacent to a major transportation corridor.
EXISTING CONDITIONS & SURROUNDING ZONING
3. The current zoning of the
subject site is S-1
(Approved C-2/CP-GCP)
(Ranch or Farm Residence
District, Approved
Intermediate Commercial
District or Commerce Park
District, General Commerce
Park Option) and it is
currently used for
agricultural operations. This
same zoning designation
extends both to the north
and south of the site, with
the same agricultural land
use. To the east, across Zoning Map
59th Avenue, is a residential Source: City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department
subdivision zoned R1-8.




Page 179
Staff Report: Z-41-21-7
September 10, 2021


West of the site, across the Loop 202 freeway, are several zoning designations, as
follows: C-2 H-R SP (Approved C-2/CP-GCP) (Intermediate Commercial District,
High Rise District, Special Permit, Approved Intermediate Commercial District or
Commerce Park District, General Commerce Park Option), C-2/CP-GCP SP
(Approved C-2/CP-GCP) (Intermediate Commercial District or Commerce Park
District, General Commerce Park Option Special Permit, Approved Intermediate
Commercial District or Commerce Park District, General Commerce Park Option),
C-2 H-R (Approved C-2/CP-GCP) (Intermediate Commercial District, High Rise
District, Approved Intermediate Commercial District or Commerce Park District,
General Commerce Park Option) and S-1 (Approved C-2/CP-GCP) (Ranch or Farm
Residence District, Approved Intermediate Commercial District or Commerce Park
District, General Commerce Park Option). This site is currently operated as a dairy
farm.
AREA PLANS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS, AND INITIATIVES
4. Laveen Southwest Growth Study
The site is located within the
boundaries of the Laveen
Southwest Growth Study,
which was developed in 1997
to analyze the existing
conditions of the Laveen
Village. It provides a land use
and design planning
framework to help shape the
growth in Laveen, while
accounting for newly annexed
farmland as well as the future
development of the South
Mountain Freeway Loop,
which has since been
completed.

The Land Use Plan contained
within this study designates
the subject site as
Commercial and is consistent
with the current overall
General Plan Land Use Map.
The proposal is consistent
with this designation and the
proposed site plan and staff
Land Use Plan, Laveen Southwest Growth Study
recommended stipulations
Source: City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department
also incorporate several




Page 180
Staff Report: Z-41-21-7
September 10, 2021


of the design policies set forth in the study. These include incorporation of wide,
detached sidewalks along 59th Avenue, robust landscaping standards, enhanced
open space, and architectural style that pays homage to the agricultural heritage of
Laveen.
PROPOSAL
5. The proposed site plan depicts a multifamily residential development consisting of a
mix of building types ranging from one to three stories in height, and residences
ranging from one to three bedrooms units. The development proposes two
vehicular entry drives along its 59th Avenue frontage. The southernmost driveway
contains a roundabout style driveway entry that connects to two separate gated
vehicular entries into the development. This driveway area will also have guest
parking spaces with pedestrian access to the leasing office and clubhouse. The site
plan depicts several desirable site design elements and amenities, which are further
reinforced through staff recommended stipulations (discussed below). As such, staff
is recommending general conformance to this site plan, per Stipulation No. 1.




Proposed Site Plan
Source: BMA Architecture




Page 181
Staff Report: Z-41-21-7
September 10, 2021


Building Heights
As noted in Background Item No. 3, the property to the east of the site, across 59th
Avenue, consists of a single-family residential neighborhood with mostly single-
story residences. To ensure an appropriate height transition as one moves west
towards the Loop 202 freeway, staff is recommending that the buildings adjacent to
59th Avenue be restricted to a maximum building height of 2 stories and 30 feet,
and all other buildings to a maximum of 3 stories and 40 feet. This is depicted on
the proposed site plan and is addressed in Stipulation No. 2.




Proposed Site Plan
Source: BMA Architecture
59th Avenue St t reetscape
To further ensure an appropriate transition from the single-family residential
community to the west, staff is recommending that a minimum 30-foot-wide
landscape setback be provided along 59th Avenue. Within the streetscape setback,
staff is recommending that large caliper trees be planted to provide both shade for
pedestrians and a vegetative buffer between this site and the homes across the
street. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 4. The site is also located along a
planned trail as depicted in the city’s Parks and Trails Map. This will be provided via
a 10-foot-wide public Shared Use Path (SUP) along 59th Avenue and will be
detached. Staff is recommending that the landscape strip between the SUP and
back of curb be planted with minimum two-inch caliper trees, vegetation to prevent




Page 182
Staff Report: Z-41-21-7
September 10, 2021


mid-block crossings, and that a minimum of 75 percent shade be provided along
the path at maturity. These recommendations are addressed in Stipulation No. 3.

Staff is also recommending enhancements to the primary entry drive on the
southeastern portion of the site. These enhancements shall include a pedestrian
connection between the interior of the development and the public sidewalk, which
shall be detached from the vehicular driveway and lined with landscape areas of no
less than five feet in width along both sides, planted with a mixture of ornamental
trees, shrubs and flower beds. Further, staff is recommending that the entire
driveway surface (outside of the community access gates) be constructed of a
material other than that used to pave the parking surfaces. These
recommendations are addressed in Stipulation No. 6.

Additional improvements to the streetscape are recommended by staff, including
the utilization of open fencing along 59th Avenue, or a combination of solid masonry
and wrought iron open view fencing, as well as decorative ranch rail fencing
elements to reflect the agricultural heritage of Laveen. These are addressed in
Stipulation No. 7 and 9.

Perimeter Treatments
The proposed site plan depicts a minimum 15-foot landscape setback along the
north, west and south perimeter property lines. Staff is recommending that these
perimeter landscape areas be landscaped with minimum 2-inch caliper trees to
buffer from adjacent properties, as well as with minimum 75 percent live
groundcover. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 5. Staff is also recommending
enhanced perimeter wall design around the property, per Stipulation No. 8.

Open Space and Shade
The site plan depicts three open space areas: a primary amenity area located within
close proximity to the primary entry driveway, a secondary amenity area within the
north-central part of the site, and a third open space area that also functions as a
retention basin within the north-western portion of the site. Staff is recommending
that a minimum 18 percent of the site be provided as open space, and that it be
equitably distributed throughout the site, per Stipulation No. 10. Staff is also
recommending that the primary amenity space remain in close proximity to the
primary entry and that it include a minimum of one swimming pool and one
clubhouse. Staff is also recommending that a minimum of three benches be
provided throughout the development within shaded areas. One of these should be
located near the primary entry drive. These recommendations are addressed in
Stipulation Nos. 10 and 11. Furthermore, staff is recommending that no more than
50 percent of the landscape areas within common areas or ten percent of the net lot
area, whichever is less, be planted in turf or other high-water use plants. This is
addressed in Stipulation No. 12.




Page 183
Staff Report: Z-41-21-7
September 10, 2021


To ensure thermal comfort for residents and guests, staff is recommending that
open space areas and pedestrian pathways be shaded at a minimum of 75 percent
shade with a combination of trees and structural shade, per Stipulation No. 14.
Further heat reduction is recommended through planting of shade trees throughout
surface parking areas to achieve a minimum of 25 percent shade, per Stipulation
No. 15.




Landscape Rendering
Source: Anderson
Pedestrian S fafety
Due to the number of outdoor amenity areas and the site’s proximity to major
commercial centers to the north on 59th Avenue and Baseline Road, significant
pedestrian activity is expected to occur. As such, staff is recommending that a
pedestrian circulation plan be put in place for the development. All pedestrian
pathways should incorporate pedestrian-scale lighting and, where the pathways
cross drive aisles, they should be constructed of a material that visually contrasts
from the drive aisle surface. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 13. Additional
traffic calming measures at all vehicular points of entry are also recommended to
enhance pedestrian safety on the site, per Stipulation No. 18.

As stated above, the site is located near commercial centers to the north, and 59th
Avenue will be an important bicycle route for nearby residents to access these
centers. To promote the use of alternative transportation modes, staff is




Page 184
Staff Report: Z-41-21-7
September 10, 2021


recommending that the development provide bicycle amenities per the standards
set forth in Section 1307.H of the Zoning Ordinance, which is the Walkable Urban
Code. Staff is also recommending the provision of one bicycle repair station so
residents and guests can service their bicycles at a convenient location. These are
addressed in Stipulation No. 17.
6. The proposed elevations depict a mixture of two- to three-story buildings and a
single-story clubhouse building. The elevations feature pitched roof elements, pop-
outs, balconies, and a variety of building materials on all building facades. Vertical
siding and standing seam roofing recall the agricultural style of Laveen and have
been incorporated into the overall modern architectural style. The homage to
Laveen’s agrarian architectural style is consistent with the design recommendations
set forth in the Laveen Southwest Growth Study. As such, staff is recommending
general conformance to these elevations, per Stipulation No. 1.




Building Elevations
Source: BMA Architecture




Page 185
Staff Report: Z-41-21-7
September 10, 2021


AREA PLANS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS, AND INITIATIVES
7. Housing Phoenix Plan
In June 2020, the Phoenix City Council approved the Housing Phoenix Plan. This
Plan contains policy initiatives for the development and preservation of housing with
a vision of creating a stronger and more vibrant Phoenix through increased housing
options for residents at all income levels and family sizes. Phoenix’s rapid
population growth and housing underproduction has led to a need for over 163,000
new housing units. Current shortages of housing supply relative to demand are a
primary reason why housing costs are increasing. The proposed development
supports the Plan’s goal of preserving or creating 50,000 housing units by 2030 by
providing an opportunity for high density residential development.
8. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan has a goal of treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure that trees are an integral part of the city’s planning and
development process. By investing in trees and the urban forest, the city can
reduce its carbon footprint, decrease energy costs, reduce storm water runoff,
increase biodiversity, address the urban heat island effect, clean the air, and
increase property values. In addition, trees can help to create walkable streets and
vibrant pedestrian places. Staff is recommending significant tree shade cover for
pedestrian pathways, SUP, open space areas, perimeter landscape areas, and
surface parking areas, per Stipulation Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 14, 15, and 16.
9. Complete Streets Guiding Principles
In 2014, the City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding
Principles. The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an
accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such as
bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. To ensure pedestrian safety throughout
the development and along the public right-of-way, staff is recommending a
detached Shared Use Path, a pedestrian circulation plan which includes pedestrian-
scale lighting, detached pedestrian connection to the street, and significant bicycle
amenities, per Stipulation Nos. 3, 6, 13, and 17.
10. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
The City of Phoenix adopted the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan in 2014 to
guide the development of its bikeway system and supportive infrastructure. The
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan supports options for both short- and long-term
bicycle parking as a means of promoting bicyclist traffic to a variety of destinations.
The proposal incorporates requirements for bicycle parking that follows standards
set forth in the Walkable Urban Code, which is the city’s form-based zoning code
intended to enhance the pedestrian realm and encourage multi-modal
transportation. Staff is further recommending a bicycle fix-it station to provide
residents and guests with a convenient place to service their bicycles. This is
addressed in Stipulation No. 17.




Page 186
Staff Report: Z-41-21-7
September 10, 2021


11. Zero Waste PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal to
become a zero waste city, as part of the city’s overall 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and
Section 716 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance expand its recycling and other waste
diversion programs. Section 716 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance establishes
standards to encourage the provision of recycling containers for multifamily,
commercial and mixed-use developments meeting certain criteria. The proposal will
utilize regular trash and recycling bins.
COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
12. At the time this staff report was written, staff had not received any community
correspondence regarding this request.
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
13. The Phoenix Fire Department has noted that they do not anticipate any problems
with this case and that the site and/or buildings shall comply with the Phoenix Fire
Code.
14. The Public Transit Department has requested that the developer provide clearly
defined, accessible pathways that connect all building entrances and exits, and
public sidewalks, and that they be constructed of materials that visually contrast
with parking and drive aisle surfaces. These are addressed in Stipulation No. 13.
This department has further requested that all pedestrian paths and sidewalks be
shaded at 75 percent at maturity. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 15.
15. The Street Transportation Department has required a 55-foot dedication for the
west half of 59th Avenue, a 14-foot-wide median along 59th Avenue from Siesta
Way to the northern edge of the development, and a minimum five-foot-wide
detached sidewalk and minimum 13-foot wide landscape area between the
sidewalk and back of curb. As explained in Background Item No. 5, a Shared Use
Path will be provided along the street in lieu of a sidewalk and will meet the intent of
the sidewalk requirement. The department has further required a shaded pedestrian
pathway constructed of bricks, paver, or similar material, connecting the site to 59th
Avenue, which was also discussed in Background Item No. 5. Additionally, the
department requires that a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) be submitted for the
development, that any existing irrigation facilities be undergrounded and relocated
outside of city right-of-way, and that all streets be constructed with all required
improvements and comply with current ADA standards. These requirements are
addressed in Stipulation Nos. 6, 18 through 24.
OTHER
16. The site is located in a larger area identified as being archaeologically sensitive. If
further review by the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office determines the site and
immediate area to be archaeologically sensitive, and if no previous archaeological
projects have been conducted within this project area, it is recommended that



Page 187
Staff Report: Z-41-21-7
September 10, 2021


archaeological Phase I data testing of this area be conducted. Phase II
archaeological data recovery excavations may be necessary based upon the
results of the testing. A qualified archaeologist must make this determination in
consultation with the City of Phoenix Archaeologist. In the event archaeological
materials are encountered during construction, all ground disturbing activities must
cease within a 33-foot radius of the discovery and the City of Phoenix Archaeology
Office must be notified immediately and allowed time to properly assess the
materials. This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 25, 26, and 27.
17. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and ordinances.
Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements. Other formal
actions such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and abandonments, may be
required.

Findings

1. The proposed development will provide high density housing within the Laveen
Village Core, where higher intensity land uses are encouraged. The site is also
adjacent to the Loop 202 freeway, a major transportation corridor, in addition to a
major commercial center to the north, on 59th Avenue and Baseline Road.
2. The proposal will provide an appropriate transition from single-family residential
neighborhoods to the east to the freeway corridor to the west of the site.
3. As stipulated, the proposal includes several site design elements that exceed
Zoning Ordinance requirements and that are consistent with the design
recommendations set forth in the Laveen Southwest Growth Study.


Stipulations

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan and elevations
date stamped August 30, 2021, as modified by the following stipulations and
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
2. The buildings along 59th Avenue, as depicted on the site plan date stamped August
31, 2021, shall not exceed a maximum height of 2 stories and 30 feet. Other
buildings on the site shall not exceed a maximum height of 3 stories and 40 feet.
3. The developer shall construct a 10-foot-wide public Shared Use Path (SUP) along
59th Avenue, which shall be detached with a landscape strip located between the
sidewalk and back of curb following the most recent Cross Section of the Street
Classification Map. The landscape area between the sidewalk and back of curb
shall be planted to the following standards, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 188
Staff Report: Z-41-21-7
September 10, 2021


a. Minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees that provide a minimum 75 percent
shade at maturity.
b. Drought tolerant vegetation maintained at a maximum height of 24 inches
and achieve 75 percent live coverage.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
4. A minimum landscape setback of 30 feet shall be required along 59th Avenue and
shall be planted with minimum 50 percent 3-inch caliper, 50 percent 4-inch caliper
large canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings,
and five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, and 75 percent live groundcover, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the
developer shall work with the Planning and Development Department on alternative
design solutions consistent with a pedestrian environment.
5. The required landscape setback along the interior property lines shall be planted
with minimum 2-inch caliper trees at 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings,
and 75 percent live groundcover at maturity, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
6. The primary vehicular entrance to the development shall include the following
elements, as approved by the Planning and Development Department:
a. Pedestrian pathway connecting the interior of the development to the public
sidewalk and shall be constructed of bricks, pavers, or similar material.
b. The pedestrian pathway shall be detached from the vehicular driveway and
lined with landscape areas on both sides of not less than 5 feet each. The
landscape area shall be planted with drought-tolerant plant materials
providing seasonal interest and 75 percent live cover.
c. A mix of ornamental trees (no less than 2-inch caliper), shrubs (no less
than five five-gallon shrubs per tree) and flower beds that will maintain a
constant bloom throughout the year and 75 percent live cover, shall be
provided along both sides of the entryway and within a landscaped median
of no less than 5 feet in width.
d. The driveway surface shall be constructed of decorative pavers, stamped
or colored concrete, or another material, other than those used to pave the
parking surfaces, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.




Page 189
Staff Report: Z-41-21-7
September 10, 2021


7. Open view wrought iron fencing or a combination of maximum two feet of solid
masonry topped by wrought iron open view fencing shall be utilized along
pedestrian and vehicular entryway areas, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
8. Walls along the perimeter of the site shall include material and textural differences,
such as stucco and/or split face block with a decorative element, such as tile or
stamped designs, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

9. Decorative rail or similar fencing elements shall be provided along 59th Avenue, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

10. The development shall provide a minimum of 18 percent of open space. A minimum
of three district open space areas shall be provided as depicted on the site plan
date stamped August 30, 2021. Additionally, three benches or seating features shall
be provided throughout the development within shaded areas. One of the benches
or seating features shall be located within close proximity to the primary entryway
along 59th Avenue.
11. A central amenity and open space area shall be provided within close proximity to
the primary vehicular entrance into the development, and include the following
amenities at a minimum, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department:
a. Swimming pool;

b. Clubhouse.

12. No more than 50 percent of the landscape areas within common areas or 10
percent of the net lot area, whichever is less, should be planted in turf or high-water
use plants. Turf areas should be located only in the common open space areas,
including retention basins, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

13. A system of pedestrian thoroughfares shall be provided at a minimum, as described
below and as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department:

a. Pathways shall be illuminated by pedestrian scale lighting per Section
1304(H)5.

b. Where pedestrian pathways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle
surfaces. Vehicular crossings shall be kept to a minimum.




Page 190
Staff Report: Z-41-21-7
September 10, 2021


14. Active open space areas, with the exception of the pool, shall be shaded a
minimum of 75 percent using architectural shade and/or shade trees at full maturity,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

15. Pedestrian paths internal within the site and connecting the public sidewalk shall be
shaded to a minimum of 75 percent using architectural shade and/or shade trees at
full maturity, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

16. All uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with a minimum 2-inch
caliper drought-tolerant shade trees. Landscaping shall be dispersed throughout the
parking areas and achieve 25 percent shade at maturity, as approved by Planning
and Development Department.

17. The development shall incorporate bicycle infrastructure as described below and as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum of four bicycle parking spaces via inverted U-bicycle racks, artistic
style bicycle racks or “Outdoor/Covered Facilities” shall be located near the
vehicular entryway into the development or nearby amenity areas. All
bicycle racks shall adhere to Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle
Master Plan.

b. Secure bicycle parking for residents shall be provided at a minimum rate of
0.25 spaces per residential unit, with a maximum of 50 spaces, and shall
adhere to the standards in Section 1307.H of the Zoning Ordinance.

c. One bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided and maintained
within close proximity to the primary vehicular entryway to the development.
The bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided in an area of high
visibility and separated from vehicular maneuvering areas, where
applicable. The repair station shall include: standard repair tools affixed to
the station; a tire gauge and pump affixed to the base of the station or the
ground; and a bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin
freely while making adjustments to the bike.

18. The developer shall provide traffic calming measures at all vehicular points of
ingress and egress to slow vehicles departing the development and crossing the
public sidewalks, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

19. The developer shall dedicate minimum 55 feet of right-of-way for the west half of
59th Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.




Page 191
Staff Report: Z-41-21-7
September 10, 2021


20. The developer shall construct and landscape a 14-foot-wide median island along
59th Avenue from Siesta Way to the northern edge of the development. A median
opening shall be provided at 59th Avenue and Siesta Way for full access while the
northern access shall be restricted to right-in/right-out only by the median island, as
depicted on the site plan date stamped August 30, 2021 and as approved by the
Street Transportation Department.

21. The developer shall construct a detached sidewalk and minimum 13-foot-wide
landscape area located between the back of curb and sidewalk as required by the
CM Cross Section along the west side of 59th Avenue, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

22. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is
reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall include signal warrant analysis
for the intersections of 59th Avenue and Dobbins Road and 59th Avenue and South
Mountain Boulevard. The developer shall be responsible for any additional
dedications and construction and/or contribute funds in escrow for the traffic
signals, as required by the approved TIS.
23. Existing irrigation facilities along any existing and or proposed right-of-way shall be
undergrounded and relocated outside of City right-of-way. Contact SRP to identify
existing land rights and establish the appropriate process to relocate the facility.
Relocations that require additional dedications or land transfer, require completion
prior to obtaining plat and or civil plan review approval.
24. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility
standards.
25. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
26. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the Phase
I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified archaeologist,
determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall
conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
27. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.




Page 192
Staff Report: Z-41-21-7
September 10, 2021



Writer
Sofia Mastikhina
August 30, 2021

Team Leader
Samantha Keating

Exhibits
Sketch Map
Aerial
Site plan date stamped August 30, 2021 (1 page)
Elevations date stamped August 30, 2021 (8 pages)
Landscape plan date stamped August 30, 2021 (1 page)




Page 193
59TH DR


R-3* ARDMORE RD


C-2/CP-GCP SP * C-2/CP-GCP
Z-7-19
Z-SP-4-09 Z-79-01
DESERT DR


58TH AVE
C-2 H-R SP * S-1
Z-SP-4-09
ANX 175
EUCLID AVE

R1-8 *
ANX 175
ANX 272 PEDRO LN
C-2 H-R * 58TH LN Z-62-02
Z-16-09 GWEN ST



SIESTA WAY

v
w
59TH AVE

C-2 *
C-2/CP-GCP

58TH DR
Z-79-01 BETH DR
S-1 ANX 175
ANX 271 ANX 272
Z-62-02 MILADA DR
Z-100-02
DOBBINS RD
C-2 PCD
S-1 HGT/WVR*
Z-31-04
Z-28-03


I
BROADWAY RD
Z-41-21
SOUTHERN AVE

Miles BASELINE RD

0.075 0.0375 0 0.075
75TH AVE
DOBBINS RD

LAVEEN VILLAGE
67TH AVE
ELLIOT RD

CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 7
59TH AVE
ESTRELLA DR




51ST AVE
27TH AVE

43RD AVE 35TH AVE



APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
P.B. Bell/Bernard Pipan
FROM:
S-1 (Approved C-2/CP-GCP) ( 14.56 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
8/03/2021
Z-41-21 REVISION DATES:



GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
14.56 Acres QS 02-14 C-5 TO: C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR ( 14.56 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 (Approved C-2/CP-GCP) 14 (211) N/A (253)
C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR 633 760

* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2021\Z-41-21.mxd
Page 194
59TH DR


R-3* ARDMORE RD


C-2/CP-GCP SP * C-2/CP-GCP
Z-7-19
Z-SP-4-09 Z-79-01
DESERT DR


58TH AVE
C-2 H-R SP * S-1
Z-SP-4-09
ANX 175
EUCLID AVE

R1-8 *
ANX 175
ANX 272 PEDRO LN
C-2 H-R * 58TH LN Z-62-02
Z-16-09 GWEN ST



SIESTA WAY

w
v
59TH AVE

C-2 *
C-2/CP-GCP

58TH DR
Z-79-01 BETH DR
S-1 ANX 175
ANX 271 ANX 272
Z-62-02 MILADA DR
Z-100-02
DOBBINS RD
C-2 PCD
S-1 HGT/WVR*
Z-31-04
Z-28-03
Maricopa County Assessor's Office




I
BROADWAY RD
Z-41-21
SOUTHERN AVE

Miles BASELINE RD

0.075 0.0375 0 0.075
75TH AVE
DOBBINS RD

LAVEEN VILLAGE
67TH AVE
ELLIOT RD

CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 7
59TH AVE
ESTRELLA DR




51ST AVE
27TH AVE

43RD AVE 35TH AVE



APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
P.B. Bell/Bernard Pipan
FROM:
S-1 (Approved C-2/CP-GCP) ( 14.56 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
8/03/2021
Z-41-21 REVISION DATES:



GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
14.56 Acres QS 02-14 C-5 TO: C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR ( 14.56 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 (Approved C-2/CP-GCP) 14 (211) N/A (253)
C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR 633 760

* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2021\Z-41-21.mxd
Page 195
     


U !ij ij NNij++ Nij ' 6 + =ij
! "# $ "ijij,Sij
Cij
 ij#ij


\÷
<ij ij" "ij
y&e 0[ij& ?5)ij? ij FdFij& ij0ij & ij
1%!ijijç<*ij


 vEij$ ?ij?2ijH5` S!ij +ijL::ij

 , ij ij
N ijij
B ij# ij
¿E«Œij2$ijM/¡M)ijO$  ij) õ`ijHû00@ij $ 6 sijēij" ij

 7&0 5ijH ij &&  Kij25)ij $ij& Y)ij ù%!ij%ij+ij
=ijij

  1`ij

:ijij

 vEij0$ij7y @ij2 ‚‚F 

!ij —AR (#ij/ ij%BLijIij=Uij%
ijijŽij,Sij' ij

 <'%ijĔij
$>zMijO 0ij >7 ij 005)ij) ij7f0@)  %ij%+!ij p p 
2[Kij&e5gij H ij& |?5Ă5ij ij) 1ij
   ò„ 7ijH ij >ø7 ij) ij
ij ij3

-!ij  hCij (ij}
ij3( ij
/-ij

 ěij
 
 ij ij3= B-!ij  hij ((ij
ij 3,ij
/-ij


 

& Z)ij& ijÅFWEħ^WFW’ij2Yeij¼FW“ij? K )

5 /

   /*5 ,  0123


  =ij !ij
. iji 'ijR A . -

7>7[ijY)ijzýijñ~ ij 0Mij) )ij>$ ij& ij



O 7 ijdij $ 1$ijd@ij  ij ij  
ijþ=!ij . ijSAU'ij%
AU'
 M 5$ &ijH ij$)ijij
 
ij
!ij +<:I+<*ij
:<
9ij ƒ2ij&$  5ij2 0Z2 @
Qij9ij   ij
 !ij DijAij,{ijGij^ij"{8
6=
 ij !ij ^ij"D,
/ijAij,ijGij#,8
/ ij >Zij> )ij $>ijĀO ij&-ij[@fij2æ ij2ij
 ˆij
4ij'ij<=
!ij Dijéij,ijcij (8ij
O & úij05ij 4ij'ij 
!ij D#ijAij,ijcij(8ij
Īij
= ;ij;ij

Pij
 
=  @& $ij ij 00 ij $ijgij7 )5@ij
'/= 9= ij? $ij&| ij&Kgijâ ijO ?1ij$?Yij
0=  *=  )„M ijH ij >7 ăij) Fij

3_ij=45=8 

59ij
'D
Š    <    
0= lijPij ;ij;ij  6ijL L1ij


= =&  ? $ijf Z5)ij >1ü ij2~ ij$ ö$ij '!ij #ij sijij

ij
 īij

;ij  %
*!ij

 
  Kij7&  ij ƒ$ij @0ij  ij '!ij "ij\
A#(ij
Gij #ijA ij
Ĩij Ĭij
5 D
 ¸Eij2$ij&$  ij& K2 @
ĭij +  ij
1
ij3 ijo -ij Tij 'ij

€=:ij:ij <ij
ij Eij mij

P
 € % :ij  :*ij4% ij #Eij ”ij
+





%=9ij  
ĩŸ 
D 

ijij+hij
D  (DD
9ij 

 % * ij
/ij%
ij 8ij/ij%
ij ij<'4ij 

ij<'4ij



 = .;= -=>D
ij+ij ""ij%1
ij  8ij D, ij
Iij (,(,(ij
Iij
ij +ijNäij  ij1
ij (8 ,ij
Iij ""
Iij
 +ij #ij1
ij  8ij #Ä"ij
/ij (( ij
Iij
Qij 1= ij+ijij ij%
ij D8ij " ij
/ij " ij
/ij
=
)D    +ij ij%
ij ,8 ij
/ij #, ij
/ij
 

  

:4ij "ij%
ij # 8ij '!ij,,"
/ij D "ij
/ij

 íij
BB4ij
 
D
T!ij :
ij

ijTmij 
' ij

ij
)
  *D ij +ij%
ij ij  #ij Xij#"ij 
ij # ij Vij ij Xij (ij 
ij
/ijUSLij
  )D9ij ij+ij
ij (ij Vij #ij Gij (ij 
ij #(ij Vij ijGij " ij 
ij
_ij ij+ij
ij
Qij9ij
ij Vij Jij  "ij 
Jij ij Vij JijGij ij ®
ij

5 - 5 Âij
 T ijB6!ij Dij 
ij ((ij 
Cij
' ijBN!ij ij 
Cij


   '!ij
 ) ;ij;ij =Pij 
ij3
' -ij cij #ij 
Cij
Page 196
?84D+D D

@2 ,D 5!D }
' ij

ij3'ij

-ij Xij " ij 
Cij
 Qij
 =;ij 
'ij

ij i %ij

-ij Úij ij J
¯ij
–9)D
µ‰D
 = lijPij ;ij;ij
)5
$%&%5
n _ij 'ij\\4!ij      J
Jij
=  B;&<$ 3D
"5!5 '5!5 '5!5 '5!5 '5 !5 '5!5 '5!5 '5!5 '5!5.5

 à

6ij î%ij

!ij
 
 +5
:(6-= 7= !5
 !5  !5  !5  !5

5 
 5 5 

       "6%#7D0

   
!5 !5 !5
 
  
!5 !5

 T!ij Xij ij 
Cij
           
)‹ij= 2
  *D
,=

'!ij Gij ij 
Cij

 'D 9ij 4¬ij5 59ij "5!5 '5!5 '5!5 '5!5 '55
    0D CD!5'5!5(5!5
'5!5'5!5 1D  
 
   
5 '5!5 '5!5 '5!5 '5!5
D
D+D *D/D    

 
   
n 9ij
¨ij́ ijؐ©ij ˆ 9 A:D

Qij= 
=



   

  
  ˜‘ij
= . İqq 6ij%+ ij


 
 ïiją¹»ıĈÓèÔêij£¤ 6ijB* ij

4L
ij4=ijo #ij
*ij
™Ąžij­¢ 5
  

     

 
  


55 #5§ďāĮij  5  

šÖÈÉʪÛÕËijÌãxij ¦Ò•ÍijÎÏijÐijįxÙ×ij ìij

6ij* ij . ij
*iji# R#ijijĒij . -ij



 



 6ij* ij ijR ij
B*ij3". ijij". -ij



 6ij* ij ij. ij
1*ij3 . -ij


     
  


 4ij* ijij. ij
1*ij3ij# . ijij. ij".-ij
    


 

 6ij* ijij. ij
1*ij3ij^ij". -ij


IJij 4ij* ij. ij
*ij3 R ij -ij



 4ij* ij(r ij
*ij3r#ijij -ij



  







     
      
   


   

     

 


   

 

aÆtÀijájĜĞijÞjĝ]ĐkĖ]ijóėjĊ›ijôĢkğ]ijºa¶ij¥åĎđć]‡ġœÜÿijwÁa¾bij
       



ęÑijbw·°ÃuDZtu½bij ëij ĤĥĦ²ij ßðÝƇĉčkĠċ†ģĚČ³†Ęĕij   
      
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Attachment C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-41-21-7

Date of VPC Meeting September 13, 2021
Request From S-1 (Approved C-2/CP-GCP) (14.56 acres)
Request To C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR (14.56 acres)
Proposed Use Multifamily Residential Development
Location Approximately 615 north of the northwest corner of 59th
Avenue and Dobbins Road
VPC Recommendation Denial as filed
VPC Vote 8-0


VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

Sofia Mastikhina, staff, provided an overview of the request, including the location,
surrounding and on-site zoning, surrounding land uses, and an explanation of proposed
entitlement. She explained that the current zoning of C-1 (Intermediate Commercial
District) permits multifamily residential development per R-3 (Multifamily Residence
District) standards. The request is to add a height and density waiver to allow for a more
intense development than would otherwise be permitted by right. She then outlined the
General Plan Land Use Map designation, noting that the site is located within the
Laveen Village Core, which is intended to be the central focus of the village where more
height and density are appropriate. She presented the proposed site plan, pointing out
the two entry driveways, three open space areas, and a height limitation for buildings
along 59th Avenue of a maximum of two stories. She then presented the landscape
plan, which includes robust landscaping within a 30-foot setback along 59th Avenue,
per staff’s request, and the proposed building elevations, which exhibit rural
architectural elements such as pitched roofs and vertical siding. She concluded her
presentation with staff’s findings and recommendation, as well as the recommended
stipulations of approval.

Manjula Vaz, representative with Gammage & Burnham, presented examples of other
projects by PB Bell, noting the high quality of the developments. She provided an
overview of the locational context of the site, outlining the relationship of the site to the
village core, and noting that the site to the south is planned for commercial
development, as well as several other commercial developments slated for construction
along the Loop 202 freeway. She presented information regarding the rezoning case
that established the commercial zoning on the site and pointed out that the approval
letter called out the intent of the village core as a high-intensity area with a mix of

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 206
commercial and high density multifamily residential development. She then presented
the proposed site plan, landscape plan, building renderings and elevations, noting the
main development features, circulation, pedestrian areas, improvements to 59th
Avenue, enhanced open space, and enhanced architecture. She also outlined the
General Plan Land Use and Design policies that are met by this proposal, and the
development impact fees, contributions of the school district, and property taxes that will
be generated by this development.

QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE
Vice Chair Linda Abegg thanked the applicant for working with the committee and the
applicant in incorporating many of the standards and design features that they
requested, and thanked staff for the recommended stipulations to ensure that the
Laveen Core is held to high standards. She stated that although the plan underwent
many changes, her main concern is that this site is designated for mixed use and the
request at hand is to increase the height and density yet does not provide a mix of uses.
She expressed concern over the trend of commercially zoned properties being
developed with only residential uses and stated that there is no guarantee that the
property to the south will develop with commercial.

Rebecca Perrera thanked the applicant for their listing of the impact fees that will be
applicable to this project and paid to the city but stated that ultimately those won’t do
much for the local community. She explained that the biggest fiscal impact at a local
level comes from sales taxes and, if Laveen continues to add rooftops without any
commercial uses, the sales taxes from Laveen residents will go to the communities that
they have to commute to for their shopping and entertainment needs. She also
expressed concern with the erosion of commercial properties in Laveen. She then
asked if the development is designed to discourage mid-block pedestrian crossings, as
there is a school on 59th Avenue with many students walking to and from every day.
Vaz replied that the developer is working with the Street Transportation Department to
ensure sufficient pedestrian safety along 59th Avenue.

Carlos Ortega expressed concern with the applicant’s usage of the word “multi-use,” as
this is not a mixed-use project. He also expressed concern with the proposed height of
3-story units and the noise mitigation from the freeway. Although the developer
incorporated some architectural features, the proposal does not meet the intent of a
mixed-use core. There is no guarantee that the property to the south will develop as
commercial, and he is opposed to the proposal at hand.

PUBLIC COMMENT
Scott Ward introduced himself as the property owner of the parcel to the south and
stated that he and his development team have been trying to attract businesses to their
site for several months. He expressed his excitement for this project as it will bring
sufficient residential units to support the future commercial uses on his property, which
will come to fruition more easily once the multifamily is developed.

Dan Penton expressed appreciation for the applicant having incorporated the
community’s desired features into the plan but stated that this proposal does not meet
the intent of the Village Core, which is to provide a mix of land uses. He explained that
the proposal means to add high density residential along the freeway corridor, which
should be an area for new employment opportunities. He then asked if the development
has considered incorporating affordable units, as affordable housing is something that
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 207
the community desperately needs. He requested that the committee deny this case or
require that the applicant file a PUD to ensure commercial development on the property
to the south.

Sandy Hamilton asked for clarification on the committee’s position regarding
multifamily housing, as they had previously made an assertion that they would no longer
approve such projects yet, just at the previous meeting, they had approved two
multifamily residential cases. He stated that the land of this subject request could be put
to better use than for multifamily housing.

Erika Lopez expressed concern over the high density of the proposal, the traffic
generation, the lack of school capacity for the new units, and the overall impact on the
neighborhood to the east. She asked that the committee recommend a continuance so
that the applicant can explore a PUD designation to solidify requirements for a
commercial portion to support the residential.

Vice Chair Abegg expressed appreciation to the applicant for working extensively with
staff, committee members, and members of the community to incorporate their
suggestions into the project. She stated that, nevertheless, the proposal does not meet
the intent of the Village Core due to a lack of a mixed-use component, and that the
promise that there will be commercial on the parcel to the south is not enough to justify
approval of this project.

MOTION
Vice Chair Abegg made motion to deny the request as filed. Carlos Ortega seconded
the motion.

VOTE
8-0: Motion passes with committee members Glass, Abegg, Barraza, Buggs, Ortega,
Perrera, Rouse, and Rowe in favor. Committee member Hurd experiences technical
difficulties during the vote and was thus absent.

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 208
ADDENDUM A
Staff Report: Z-41-21-7
September 20, 2021

Laveen Village Planning Committee September 13, 2021
Meeting Date
Planning Commission Hearing Date October 7, 2021

Request From: S-1 (Approved C-2/CP-GCP) (14.56 acres)
Request To: C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR (14.56 acres)
Proposed Use Multifamily residential with a height and density
waiver
Location Approximately 615 feet north of the northwest
corner of 59th Avenue and Dobbins Road
Owner The Williams Family Living 1996 Trust
Applicant Anne Healy, P.B. Bell
Representative Manjula M. Vaz, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff Recommendation Approval, subject to stipulations

The purpose of this addendum is to revise the staff recommended stipulations to modify
language pertaining to the relocation of existing irrigation facilities. The applicant has
coordinated with the Street Transportation Department to clarify the language in
Stipulation No. 23 to allow for the removal of existing underground irrigation facilities.
The previous stipulation language limited it to undergrounding and relocation only.

On September 13, 2021, the Laveen Village Planning Committee heard this request and
denied it by a vote of 11-0.

Staff recommends approval subject to the following revised stipulations:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan and
elevations date stamped August 30, 2021, as modified by the following
stipulations and approved by the Planning and Development Department.
2. The buildings along 59th Avenue, as depicted on the site plan date stamped
August 31, 2021, shall not exceed a maximum height of 2 stories and 30 feet.
Other buildings on the site shall not exceed a maximum height of 3 stories and 40
feet.




Page 209
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-41-21-7
September 20, 2021


3. The developer shall construct a 10-foot-wide public Shared Use Path (SUP) along
59th Avenue, which shall be detached with a landscape strip located between the
sidewalk and back of curb following the most recent Cross Section of the Street
Classification Map. The landscape area between the sidewalk and back of curb
shall be planted to the following standards, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees that provide a minimum 75 percent
shade at maturity.
b. Drought tolerant vegetation maintained at a maximum height of 24 inches
and achieve 75 percent live coverage.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
4. A minimum landscape setback of 30 feet shall be required along 59th Avenue and
shall be planted with minimum 50 percent 3-inch caliper, 50 percent 4-inch caliper
large canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings,
and five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, and 75 percent live groundcover, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the
developer shall work with the Planning and Development Department on
alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian environment.
5. The required landscape setback along the interior property lines shall be planted
with minimum 2-inch caliper trees at 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings,
and 75 percent live groundcover at maturity, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
6. The primary vehicular entrance to the development shall include the following
elements, as approved by the Planning and Development Department:
a. Pedestrian pathway connecting the interior of the development to the public
sidewalk and shall be constructed of bricks, pavers, or similar material.
b. The pedestrian pathway shall be detached from the vehicular driveway and
lined with landscape areas on both sides of not less than 5 feet each. The
landscape area shall be planted with drought-tolerant plant materials
providing seasonal interest and 75 percent live cover.
c. A mix of ornamental trees (no less than 2-inch caliper), shrubs (no less
than five five-gallon shrubs per tree) and flower beds that will maintain a
constant bloom throughout the year and 75 percent live cover, shall be
provided along both sides of the entryway and within a landscaped median
of no less than 5 feet in width.




Page 210
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-41-21-7
September 20, 2021


d. The driveway surface shall be constructed of decorative pavers, stamped
or colored concrete, or another material, other than those used to pave the
parking surfaces, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
7. Open view wrought iron fencing or a combination of maximum two feet of solid
masonry topped by wrought iron open view fencing shall be utilized along
pedestrian and vehicular entryway areas, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
8. Walls along the perimeter of the site shall include material and textural
differences, such as stucco and/or split face block with a decorative element, such
as tile or stamped designs, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

9. Decorative rail or similar fencing elements shall be provided along 59th Avenue,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

10. The development shall provide a minimum of 18 percent of open space. A
minimum of three district open space areas shall be provided as depicted on the
site plan date stamped August 30, 2021. Additionally, three benches or seating
features shall be provided throughout the development within shaded areas. One
of the benches or seating features shall be located within close proximity to the
primary entryway along 59th Avenue.
11. A central amenity and open space area shall be provided within close proximity to
the primary vehicular entrance into the development, and include the following
amenities at a minimum, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department:
a. Swimming pool;

b. Clubhouse.

12. No more than 50 percent of the landscape areas within common areas or 10
percent of the net lot area, whichever is less, should be planted in turf or high-
water use plants. Turf areas should be located only in the common open space
areas, including retention basins, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

13. A system of pedestrian thoroughfares shall be provided at a minimum, as
described below and as approved or modified by the Planning and Development
Department:

a. Pathways shall be illuminated by pedestrian scale lighting per Section
1304(H)5.




Page 211
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-41-21-7
September 20, 2021


b. Where pedestrian pathways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle
surfaces. Vehicular crossings shall be kept to a minimum.

14. Active open space areas, with the exception of the pool, shall be shaded a
minimum of 75 percent using architectural shade and/or shade trees at full
maturity, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

15. Pedestrian paths internal within the site and connecting the public sidewalk shall
be shaded to a minimum of 75 percent using architectural shade and/or shade
trees at full maturity, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

16. All uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with a minimum 2-
inch caliper drought-tolerant shade trees. Landscaping shall be dispersed
throughout the parking areas and achieve 25 percent shade at maturity, as
approved by Planning and Development Department.

17. The development shall incorporate bicycle infrastructure as described below and
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum of four bicycle parking spaces via inverted U-bicycle racks, artistic
style bicycle racks or “Outdoor/Covered Facilities” shall be located near the
vehicular entryway into the development or nearby amenity areas. All
bicycle racks shall adhere to Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle
Master Plan.

b. Secure bicycle parking for residents shall be provided at a minimum rate of
0.25 spaces per residential unit, with a maximum of 50 spaces, and shall
adhere to the standards in Section 1307.H of the Zoning Ordinance.

c. One bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided and maintained
within close proximity to the primary vehicular entryway to the development.
The bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided in an area of high
visibility and separated from vehicular maneuvering areas, where
applicable. The repair station shall include: standard repair tools affixed to
the station; a tire gauge and pump affixed to the base of the station or the
ground; and a bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin
freely while making adjustments to the bike.

18. The developer shall provide traffic calming measures at all vehicular points of
ingress and egress to slow vehicles departing the development and crossing the
public sidewalks, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

19. The developer shall dedicate minimum 55 feet of right-of-way for the west half of
59th Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.




Page 212
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-41-21-7
September 20, 2021


20. The developer shall construct and landscape a 14-foot-wide median island along
59th Avenue from Siesta Way to the northern edge of the development. A median
opening shall be provided at 59th Avenue and Siesta Way for full access while the
northern access shall be restricted to right-in/right-out only by the median island,
as depicted on the site plan date stamped August 30, 2021 and as approved by
the Street Transportation Department.

21. The developer shall construct a detached sidewalk and minimum 13-foot-wide
landscape area located between the back of curb and sidewalk as required by the
CM Cross Section along the west side of 59th Avenue, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

22. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is
reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall include signal warrant analysis
for the intersections of 59th Avenue and Dobbins Road and 59th Avenue and
South Mountain Boulevard. The developer shall be responsible for any additional
dedications and construction and/or contribute funds in escrow for the traffic
signals, as required by the approved TIS.
23. Existing irrigation facilities along any existing and or proposed right-of-way shall
be EITHER REMOVED FROM CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY OR undergrounded and
relocated outside of City right-of-way. Contact SRP to identify existing land rights
and establish the appropriate process to REMOVE OR relocate the facility.
Relocations that require additional dedications or land transfer, require completion
prior to obtaining plat and or civil plan review approval.
24. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
25. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
26. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
27. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.



Page 213
Attachment E


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
October 7, 2021

ITEM NO: 11
DISTRICT NO.: 7
SUBJECT:

Application #: Z-41-21-7
Location: Approximately 615 feet north of the northwest corner of 59th
Avenue and Dobbins Road
From: S-1 (Approved C-2/CP-GCP)
To: C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR
Acreage: 14.56
Proposal: Multifamily residential with a height and density waiver
Applicant: Anne Healy, P.B. Bell
Owner: The Williams Family Living 1996 Trust
Representative: Manjula M. Vaz, Gammage & Burnham, PLC

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Laveen 9/13/2021 Denial. Vote: 8-0.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the staff recommendation, with
additional stipulations (Addendum A Staff Report).

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Commissioner Busching made a MOTION to approve Z-41-21-7, per the
staff recommendation, with the additional stipulation as read into the record and a
stipulation to require a minimum of one pedestrian connection within the west 600 feet of
the property, along the south side, to allow access between the site and any future
development to the south, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

Maker: Busching
Second: Gaynor
Vote: 7-1 (Perez)
Absent: Shank
Opposition Present: Yes




Page 214
Findings:

1. The proposed development will provide high density housing within the Laveen
Village Core, where higher intensity land uses are encouraged. The site is also
adjacent to the Loop 202 freeway, a major transportation corridor, in addition to a
major commercial center to the north, on 59th Avenue and Baseline Road.

2. The proposal will provide an appropriate transition from single-family residential
neighborhoods to the east to the freeway corridor to the west of the site.

3. As stipulated, the proposal includes several site design elements that exceed
Zoning Ordinance requirements and that are consistent with the design
recommendations set forth in the Laveen Southwest Growth Study.

Stipulations:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan and
elevations date stamped August 30, 2021, as modified by the following
stipulations and approved by the Planning and Development Department.

2. The buildings along 59th Avenue, as depicted on the site plan date stamped
August 31, 2021, shall not exceed a maximum height of 2 stories and 30 feet.
Other buildings on the site shall not exceed a maximum height of 3 stories and 40
feet.

3. The developer shall construct a 10-foot-wide public Shared Use Path (SUP)
along 59th Avenue, which shall be detached with a landscape strip located
between the sidewalk and back of curb following the most recent Cross Section
of the Street Classification Map. The landscape area between the sidewalk and
back of curb shall be planted to the following standards, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees that provide a minimum 75 percent
shade at maturity.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation maintained at a maximum height of 24 inches
and achieve 75 percent live coverage.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

4. A minimum landscape setback of 30 feet shall be required along 59th Avenue
and shall be planted with minimum 50 percent 3-inch caliper, 50 percent 4-inch
caliper large canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on center or in equivalent
groupings, and five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, and 75 percent live groundcover, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. Where utility conflicts
exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and Development Department
on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian environment.




Page 215
5. The required landscape setback along the interior property lines shall be planted
with minimum 2-inch caliper trees at 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings,
and 75 percent live groundcover at maturity, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

6. The primary vehicular entrance to the development shall include the following
elements, as approved by the Planning and Development Department:

a. Pedestrian pathway connecting the interior of the development to the
public sidewalk and shall be constructed of bricks, pavers, or similar
material.

b. The pedestrian pathway shall be detached from the vehicular driveway and
lined with landscape areas on both sides of not less than 5 feet each. The
landscape area shall be planted with drought-tolerant plant materials
providing seasonal interest and 75 percent live cover.

c. A mix of ornamental trees (no less than 2-inch caliper), shrubs (no less
than five five-gallon shrubs per tree) and flower beds that will maintain a
constant bloom throughout the year and 75 percent live cover, shall be
provided along both sides of the entryway and within a landscaped median
of no less than 5 feet in width.

d. The driveway surface shall be constructed of decorative pavers, stamped
or colored concrete, or another material, other than those used to pave the
parking surfaces, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

7. Open view wrought iron fencing or a combination of maximum two feet of solid
masonry topped by wrought iron open view fencing shall be utilized along
pedestrian and vehicular entryway areas, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

8. Walls along the perimeter of the site shall include material and textural
differences, such as stucco and/or split face block with a decorative element,
such as tile or stamped designs, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

9. Decorative rail or similar fencing elements shall be provided along 59th Avenue,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

10. The development shall provide a minimum of 18 percent of open space. A
minimum of three district open space areas shall be provided as depicted on the
site plan date stamped August 30, 2021. Additionally, three benches or seating
features shall be provided throughout the development within shaded areas. One
of the benches or seating features shall be located within close proximity to the
primary entryway along 59th Avenue.




Page 216
11. A central amenity and open space area shall be provided within close proximity to
the primary vehicular entrance into the development, and include the following
amenities at a minimum, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department:

a. Swimming pool;

b. Clubhouse.

12. No more than 50 percent of the landscape areas within common areas or 10
percent of the net lot area, whichever is less, should be planted in turf or high-
water use plants. Turf areas should be located only in the common open space
areas, including retention basins, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

13. A system of pedestrian thoroughfares shall be provided at a minimum, as
described below and as approved or modified by the Planning and Development
Department:

a. Pathways shall be illuminated by pedestrian scale lighting per Section
1304(H)5.

b. Where pedestrian pathways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle
surfaces. Vehicular crossings shall be kept to a minimum.

14. Active open space areas, with the exception of the pool, shall be shaded a
minimum of 75 percent using architectural shade and/or shade trees at full
maturity, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

15. Pedestrian paths internal within the site and connecting the public sidewalk shall
be shaded to a minimum of 75 percent using architectural shade and/or shade
trees at full maturity, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

16. All uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with a minimum 2-
inch caliper drought-tolerant shade trees. Landscaping shall be dispersed
throughout the parking areas and achieve 25 percent shade at maturity, as
approved by Planning and Development Department.

17. The development shall incorporate bicycle infrastructure as described below and
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum of four bicycle parking spaces via inverted U-bicycle racks,
artistic style bicycle racks or “Outdoor/Covered Facilities” shall be located
near the vehicular entryway into the development or nearby amenity areas.
All bicycle racks shall adhere to Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle
Master Plan.




Page 217
b. Secure bicycle parking for residents shall be provided at a minimum rate of
0.25 spaces per residential unit, with a maximum of 50 spaces, and shall
adhere to the standards in Section 1307.H of the Zoning Ordinance.

c. One bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided and maintained
within close proximity to the primary vehicular entryway to the
development. The bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided in
an area of high visibility and separated from vehicular maneuvering areas,
where applicable. The repair station shall include: standard repair tools
affixed to the station; a tire gauge and pump affixed to the base of the
station or the ground; and a bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and
wheels to spin freely while making adjustments to the bike.

18. The developer shall provide traffic calming measures at all vehicular points of
ingress and egress to slow vehicles departing the development and crossing the
public sidewalks, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

19. The developer shall dedicate minimum 55 feet of right-of-way for the west half of
59th Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

20. The developer shall construct and landscape a 14-foot-wide median island along
59th Avenue from Siesta Way to the northern edge of the development. A median
opening shall be provided at 59th Avenue and Siesta Way for full access while
the northern access shall be restricted to right-in/right-out only by the median
island, as depicted on the site plan date stamped August 30, 2021 and as
approved by the Street Transportation Department.

21. The developer shall construct a detached sidewalk and minimum 13-foot-wide
landscape area located between the back of curb and sidewalk as required by
the CM Cross Section along the west side of 59th Avenue, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

22. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is
reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall include signal warrant analysis
for the intersections of 59th Avenue and Dobbins Road and 59th Avenue and
South Mountain Boulevard. The developer shall be responsible for any additional
dedications and construction and/or contribute funds in escrow for the traffic
signals, as required by the approved TIS.

23. Existing irrigation facilities along any existing and or proposed right-of-way shall
be EITHER REMOVED FROM CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY OR undergrounded and
relocated outside of City right-of-way. Contact SRP to identify existing land rights
and establish the appropriate process to REMOVE OR relocate the facility.
Relocations that require additional dedications or land transfer, require
completion prior to obtaining plat and or civil plan review approval.




Page 218
24. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

25. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

26. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

27. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

28. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER
SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE
WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDER'S OFFICE AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED IN
THE REZONING APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.

29. A MINIMUM OF ONE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED
WITHIN THE WEST 600 FEET OF THE PROPERTY, ALONG THE SOUTH
SIDE, TO ALLOW ACCESS BETWEEN THE SITE AND ANY FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT TO THE SOUTH, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact Angie
Holdsworth at (602) 495-5622, TTY use 7-1-1.




Page 219
Attachment F

CITY OF PHOENIX
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

FORM TO REQUEST PC to CC
I HEREBY REQUEST THAT THE CC HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON: 11/3/2021

APPLICATION NO/ Z-41-21-7 (SIGNATURE ON ORIGINAL IN FILE)
LOCATION Northwest corner of opposition x applicant
59th Avenue and
Dobbins Road

APPEALED FROM: PC 5407 West Winston Drive
10/7/2021 Laveen, Arizona 85339

PC DATE STREET/ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP
TO PC/CC CC Linda Abegg
HEARING 11/3/2021 801-358-1736
Linda.abegg@gmail.com

CC DATE NAME / PHONE / EMAIL
REASON FOR REQUEST:

This application allows a change from mixed use to high density. Unless commercial is
included the density and height waivers should be denied.

RECEIVED BY: Racelle Escolar RECEIVED ON: 10/8/2021

Alan Stephenson Greg Harmon
Joshua Bednarek Samantha Keating
Tricia Gomes Paul M. Li
Racelle Escolar Village Planner
Stephanie Vasquez GIS
David Urbinato Applicant
Vikki Cipolla-Murillo




Page 220
Page 221
Attachment G




Page 222
Page 223
Attachment H

Sofia Mastikhina

From: Scott Kuknyo
Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2021 1:05 PM
To: Sofia Mastikhina
Subject: Laveen Village Planning Committee meeting September 13th, 6:30pm

Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged


Hi Sofia,

I understand you are the contact to submit general questions or comments to for the above mentioned meeting
on Monday, September 13th.

If for any reason this email isn’t sufficient, I would be willing to ask questions/comments during the call.


Comments:

- Developers are wanting to rezone land for high density multi-family apartments along 59th Ave, adjacent to
South Mountain Rd. The developers are obviously focused on only their particular building proposals but the
City needs to be more engaged to the broader “community” perspective to avoid over population saturation.

- There is not enough infrastructure to support the volume of traffic through the entire 59th Ave. corridor
between Baseline Rd and Dobbins Rd. A single two lane road will NOT support the attendees of Fairfax High
School, existing residential communities (specifically, Paseo Pointe), new apartments already built on the SE
corner of 59th Ave and South Mountain Rd., the new retail stores that have yet to be developed between South
Mountain Rd and Baseline Rd., in addition to the two separate high density apartment complexes being
proposed between South Mountain Rd to Dobbins Rd.

- For the last several years, there hasn’t been nearly enough Police (and likely Fire) resources for the Laveen
Village population. This remains an ever-growing problem that continues to persist. Adding high density
apartments throughout Laveen Village will create greater demand on those resources that do not exist.

- Anyone currently living in Laveen Village is well aware of the challenges of reliably finding routine food items
on grocery store shelves. Residents like myself need to travel to other cities to grocery shop. Adding the
volume of density proposed by these developers only further adds to the strain of our basic shopping needs.

- I am not opposed to apartments in general but there shouldn’t be a cluster of high density apartments within
less than a quarter mile from each other. Laveen Village requires a better land usage approach. Please
consider creating a much greater distance between these high density apartments.

Sincerely,
Scott Kuknyo
8622 S. 58th Dr.
Laveen, AZ. 85339





Page 224
Racelle Escolar

From: Linda Abegg
Sent: Tuesday, October 5, 2021 4:04 PM
To: Racelle Escolar
Subject: PC 10/7: Z-41-21



Hi Racelle,
Can you please send this to the commissioners or read it as a comment at the meeting? Unfortunately I am unable to be
there to speak on Thursday. Thanks!

Planning Commission Members,

I am unable to attend Thursday's meeting, but as a community member and Vice Chair of the LVPC, I'd like to give input
on the case NW of 59th Ave and Dobbins in Laveen (Z-41-21).

1. Right now the entire parcel is zoned mixed use, but could be developed into multi‐family without a public hearing
process. Only the northern portion is included in this case.

2. If the northern portion is granted the requested height and density variance, the land owner still has the ability to
build multi‐family on the southern portion without public hearings, eliminating the commercial part of the mixed use.

3. Because this is zoned and planned as mixed use, the LVPC and Laveen community oppose the height and density
variance that would allow for an even higher density of multifamily without any commercial.

4. I would support the increase in height and density if the entire parcel were being rezoned as a PUD with commercial
included so that the mixed use designation is preserved. Although the landowners have provided written assurances
that they intend to build commercial on the southern portion, we all know that a letter is not enforceable; we need the
zoning to match the agreement.

Thank you for your support of responsible development in our community,
Linda Abegg
Vice Chair LVPC
5407 W Winston Dr
Laveen, AZ 85339




Page1 225



Report