← Back to meetings

Meeting City Council Formal Meeting-3/5/2025 complete

2025-03-05 · Formal

Items: 83

City Council Formal Meeting

View on Agenda Online ↗


Synced: 2026-05-28 03:37 AZ

Item text
(CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 19, 2025) - For Approval or Correction, the
Minutes of the Formal Meeting on October 2, 2024

Summary
This item transmits the minutes of the Formal Meeting of October 2, 2024, for review,
correction and/or approval by the City Council.

The minutes are available for review in the City Clerk Department, 200 W. Washington
Street, 15th Floor.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
For Approval or Correction, the Minutes of the Formal Meeting on October 16,

Summary
This item transmits the minutes of the Formal Meeting of October 16, 2024, for review,
correction and/or approval by the City Council.

The minutes are available for review in the City Clerk Department, 200 W. Washington
Street, 15th Floor.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
For Approval or Correction, the Minutes of the Formal Meeting on October 30,

Summary
This item transmits the minutes of the Formal Meeting of October 30, 2024, for review,
correction and/or approval by the City Council.

The minutes are available for review in the City Clerk Department, 200 W. Washington
Street, 15th Floor.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Summary
This item transmits recommendations from the Mayor and Council for appointment or
reappointment to City Boards and Commissions.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Mayor's Office.





To: City Council Date: March 5, 2025
From: Mayor Kate Gallego

Subject: BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS – APPOINTEES

The purpose of this memo is to provide recommendations for appointments to the
following Boards and Commissions:

Central City Village Planning Committee

Councilman Galindo-Elvira recommends the following for reappointment:

Faith Burton

Ms. Burton will serve her second term to expire March 5, 2027.

Citizens Transportation Commission

Councilwoman Hodge Washington recommends the following for appointment:

Luke Douglas

Mr. Douglas is an attorney with the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office and a resident of
District 8. He fills a vacancy for a partial term to expire June 30, 2027.

Councilman Galindo-Elvira recommends the following for appointment:

Lisa Perez
Ms. Perez is a Principal at Onyx Consulting Group, LLC and a resident of District 7. She
fills a vacancy for a partial term to expire June 30, 2027.

Estrella Village Planning Committee

Councilman Galindo-Elvira recommends the following for reappointment:

Romona Burris
Ms. Burris will serve her second term to expire March 5, 2027.




Markus Ceniceros

Mr. Ceniceros will serve his second term to expire March 5, 2027.

Renee Dominguez

Ms. Dominguez will serve her second term to expire March 5, 2027.

Lisa Perez

Ms. Perez will serve her third term to expire March 5, 2027.

Laveen Village Planning Committee

Councilwoman Hodge Washington recommends the following for appointment:

Juanita Darby

Ms. Darby is an adjunct faculty member at South Mountain Community College and a
resident of District 8. She fills a vacancy for a term to expire March 5, 2027.

Kristi McCann

Ms. McCann is teacher at Laveen Elementary School District and a resident of District
8. She fills a vacancy for a term to expire March 5, 2027.

Councilman Galindo-Elvira recommends the following for reappointment:

Patrick Nasser-Taylor

Mr. Nasser-Taylor will serve his second term to expire March 5, 2027.

Jennifer Rouse

Ms. Rouse will serve her fifth term to expire March 5, 2027.

Mixen Rubio-Raffin

Ms. Rubio-Raffin will serve her second term to expire March 5, 2027.




South Mountain Village Planning Committee

Councilwoman Hodge Washington recommends the following for appointment:

Ralph Thompson II

Mr. Thompson is the Director of Conduct and Care at South Mountain Community
College and a resident of District 8. He fills a vacancy for a term to expire March 5,
2027.







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Homeland Brew Co. - District 1

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 323592.

Summary

Applicant
Michael Bielawski, Agent

License Type
Series 7 - Beer and Wine Bar

Location
4225 W. Fortune Drive, Ste. 100
Zoning Classification: C-2 PCD
Council District: 1

This request is for a new liquor license for a beer and wine bar. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business
is currently being remodeled with plans to open in April 2025.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is March 14, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications, and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of



Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I bring extensive experience in managing and responsible alcohol service, backed by
a thorough understanding of all relevant local and state regulations. I have
implemented clear policies and staff training programs to prevent underage sales,
promote responsible consumption, and ensure a secure environment for patron and
the community. With a solid track record in understandning compliance, I am fully
prepared to uphold all legal requirements and foster a positive, responsible
establishment.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“My establishment will provide a safe, welcoming space while strictly following all
regulations. I plan to support and be an advocate for veterans, military members, first
responders and my community. Fostering positive connections, creating local jobs, and
contributing to the overall exconmic and well-being of the area, I will maintain the
highest standards of responsible service.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Homeland Brew Co. - Data
Attachment B - Homeland Brew Co. - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: HOMELAND BREW CO. LLC
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 2 1

Beer and Wine Bar 7 3 2

Liquor Store 9 3 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 3 2

Restaurant 12 9 3


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 18.36 66.13

Violent Crimes 12.31 1.03 2.97

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 43 2

Total Violations 74 3



Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

6100003 1546 54 25 3

6100004 2234 70 6 4

6102003 1703 53 21 5

Average 0 61 13 19




Liquor License Map: HOMELAND BREW CO. LLC
4225 W FORTUNE DR




Date: 2/13/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation -
District 2

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Jillian Absalom

Location
7000 E. Mayo Boulevard
Council District: 2

Function
Pickleball Tournament

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
March 22, 2025 - 9 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. / 500 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Tepeyac Leadership, Inc. - District 2

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Cristofer Pereyra

Location
3801 E. Greenway Road
Council District: 2

Function
Dinner

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
April 12, 2025 - 5 p.m. to 10 p.m. / 200 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - M Catering Main Course - District 2

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 324739.

Summary

Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent

License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store

Location
20645 N. 28th Street
Zoning Classification: CP/GCP
Council District: 2

This request is for an acquisition of control of an existing liquor license for a catering
company. This location is currently licensed for liquor sales. This location requires a
Use Permit to allow package liquor sales.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is March 8, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,



grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is an experience licensee and is committed to upholding the highest
standards to maintain compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be
trained in the techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales and service.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application, noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Phoenix Harley Owners Group Charities, Inc. -
District 3

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Frank Stubbs

Location
13850 N. Cave Creek Road
Council District: 3

Function
Community Event

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
April 5, 2025 - 11 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. / 4,000 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Brian's Discount Market - District 3

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 328001.

Summary

Applicant
Ashor Haron, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
13648 N. 19th Avenue
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 3

This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that does not sell gas.
This location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with
an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is March 14, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications, and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of



Arizona.

Public Opinion
One letter protesting the issuance of this license has been received and is on file in the
Office of the City Clerk. The letter is from the Shaw Butte Neighborhood Alliance. They
feel that there are too many liquor licenses in the area and that adding another liquor
license will have a negative impact on the neighborhood. They believe the
establishment currently focuses on tobacco sales. They are concerned with the
location and its proximity to schools, churches, and a local substance use disorder
facility. They do not support the issuance of this liquor license.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I hold a certificate for 'The Basic Liquor Law Training'. This training provided me the
opportunity of learning the importance and significance of obtaining a beer and wine
license. I am assured to uphold the laws and regulations about beer and wine license.
I have never been involved in any criminal activity, no record of getting in trouble with
law and authorities.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This store will provide a safe and secure place for the neighborhood to buy beer and
wine The location will be convenient for the people in neighorhood who may not have
access to transportation. Adding the long time experience of the owner with running a
store while upholding all the laws and regulations, the store will be safe, secure and
convenience place for the customers to purchase quality alcohol.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application, noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances. Staff gave careful consideration to the
protest letter received; however, after reviewing the application in its entirety, staff is
recommending approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Brian's Discount Market - Data
Attachment B - Brian's Discount Market - Map



Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: BRIANS DISCOUNT MARKET
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Government 5 1 0

Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0

Liquor Store 9 6 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 4 3

Restaurant 12 1 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 105.99 130.99

Violent Crimes 12.31 18.36 27.17

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 43 116

Total Violations 74 211




Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1036051 2033 100 6 0

1036091 1106 80 9 2

1036093 1696 0 5 20

1036094 1550 0 21 50

1036141 2505 91 10 4

1036151 906 52 16 12

1039001 1271 83 16 20

1039003 1903 43 0 22

1039004 1522 83 0 5

Average 0 61 13 19




Liquor License Map: BRIANS DISCOUNT MARKET
13648 N 19TH AVE




Date: 2/11/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - One Stop Store - District 3

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 328089.

Summary

Applicant
Mohammed Hamideh, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
12839 N. Cave Creek Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 3

This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that does not sell gas.
This location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with
an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is March 14, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications, and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of



Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have held a liquor license previously. I'm an extremely responsible individual and a
family person.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This is a great convenience to our community and the public as the store offers a big
variety of products that each household needs. A walking distance from our
neighbors."

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - One Stop Store - Data
Attachment B - One Stop Store - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: ONE STOP STORE
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Wholesaler 4 1 1

Bar 6 1 0

Liquor Store 9 1 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 3 2


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 55.73 121.12

Violent Crimes 12.31 7.64 20.7

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 43 82

Total Violations 74 140




Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1035022 816 79 4 8

1035024 884 66 13 5

1035025 1744 70 0 4

1037011 968 37 20 12

1037012 1871 58 17 5

1037013 1355 42 20 23

1037023 1050 23 4 11

1048024 1057 65 0 29

Average 0 61 13 19




Liquor License Map: ONE STOP STORE
12839 N CAVE CREEK RD




Date: 1/23/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Thomas Liquor - District 4

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 324679.

Summary

Applicant
Lauren Merrett, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
2807 N. 35th Avenue
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 4

This request is for an acquisition of control of an existing liquor license for a
convenience store that does not sell gas. This location is currently licensed for liquor
sales.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is March 16, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,



grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am confident in my ability to responsibly manage and operate a business with a
liquor license, supported by a track record of reliability and qualifications. My
experience, commitment to compliance, and understanding of regulatory requirements
make me a suitable candidate for holding a liquor license in the city of Phoenix.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application, noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Knights of Columbus Cathedral Council 12708 -
District 5

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Richard Garrison

Location
6351 N. 27th Avenue
Council District: 5

Function
Dinner and Concert

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
April 26, 2025 - 6 p.m. to 10 p.m. / 250 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - M2J Beer Wine & Mart - District 5

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 323826.

Summary

Applicant
Omer Muradi, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
2651 W. Glendale Avenue
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 5

This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that does not sell gas.
This location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with
an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is March 17, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications, and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of



Arizona.

Public Opinion
Three valid letters protesting the issuance of this license have been received and are
on file in the Office of the City Clerk. The letters are from North Glen Square
Neighborhood Association, Lane Avenue Block Watch, and Ocotillo Glen Community
Alliance. They feel that there are sufficient liquor licenses in the area and the area has
experienced an increase in crime; therefore, they believe that adding another liquor
license will not add to, or benefit, the community's quality of life.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have been project manager in construction with Maricopa county and managed
multiple multiple million project, was in communication with city of phoenix during
construction.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“There are not many general stores, for the public's convenience it is very near to the
residen on south of the mentioned property.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application. Staff gave careful consideration to the
protest letters received; however, after reviewing the application in its entirety, staff is
recommending approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - M2J Beer Wine & Mart - Data
Attachment B - M2J Beer Wine & Mart - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: M2J BEER WINE AND MART
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 3 1

Liquor Store 9 3 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 14 5

Restaurant 12 3 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 201.72 225.26

Violent Crimes 12.31 57.32 71.12

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 43 99

Total Violations 73 191




Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1059003 1609 59 5 25

1060011 1487 31 17 50

1060032 1673 52 15 25

1068011 1652 2 12 52

1068012 1670 5 28 55

1068021 1099 60 0 9

1069001 1043 81 11 4

1069002 2629 71 5 22

Average 0 61 13 19




Liquor License Map: M2J BEER WINE AND MART
2651 W GLENDALE AVE




Date: 2/12/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - LA Crab Shack - District 6

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 324094.

Summary

Applicant
Alan Nguyen, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
4803 E. Ray Road, Ste. 103
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 6

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is March 7, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications, and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.




Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“This is our third location also I have basic training and management of liquor law
training.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“It will provides a positive contribution to the local community and it implies that the
community would be better off with this establishment serving alcohol available to
them.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application, noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - LA Crab Shack - Data
Attachment B - LA Crab Shack - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: LA CRAB SHACK
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 1 1

Bar 6 3 1

Beer and Wine Bar 7 7 3

Liquor Store 9 10 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 8 2

Hotel 11 1 0

Restaurant 12 45 12

Club 14 1 0



Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 89.94 165.71

Violent Crimes 12.31 10.21 11.35

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 43 6

Total Violations 74 9




Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1167171 1769 0 25 11

1167181 2685 40 10 9

1167191 1679 87 3 2

1167192 1023 3 7 22

1167193 1688 72 17 14

8104002 314 3 25 12

Average 0 61 13 19




Liquor License Map: LA CRAB SHACK
4803 E RAY RD




Date: 1/8/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Cowtown S.K.A.T.E. - District 7

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Laura Martin

Location
67 W. Culver Street
Council District: 7

Function
Concert

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
March 22, 2025 - 7:30 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. / 1,500 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - St. Patrick's Day Parade Committee and Irish
Society of Arizona, Inc. - District 7

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Vicki Champion

Location
67 W. Culver Street
Council District: 7

Function
Cultural Festival

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
March 15, 2025 - 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. / 2,500 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Evans Churchill Community Association -
District 8

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Sean Johnson

Location
907 N. 5th Street
Council District: 8

Function
Block Party

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
April 11, 2025 - 2 p.m. to 10 p.m. / 5,000 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Forty Eight Foundation - District 8

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Ernest Hickman

Location
401 S. 1st Avenue
Council District: 8

Function
Motorcycle Show

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
April 4, 2025 - 8 p.m. to 2 a.m. / 5,000 attendees
April 5, 2025 - 8 p.m. to 2 a.m. / 5,000 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
LinkedIn Corporation

For $63,000 in payment authority to purchase a three-year license for LinkedIn
recruitment software for the Community and Economic Development Department. This
software will support employers more effectively by providing access to better qualified
job candidates and promoting job openings for partner employers.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Rounds Consulting Group, Inc.

For $75,000 in payment authority for a new contract, for a term of one year for
economic development consulting services for the Community and Economic
Development Department. These services will include an economic impact study for
the area surrounding 7th Avenue and Washington Street, in anticipation of a future
solicitation for the disposition of City-owned property at this intersection, as well as a
retail demand study for South Phoenix.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
MG Trust Investments, LLC dba American Bindery & Mailing

For $165,000 in payment authority for a new contract, entered on or about March 1,
2025, for a term of five years for Outside Bindery Services for the City Clerk
Department. The City Clerk Department's Print Shop uses the services to provide post-
printing finishing for all printed materials for various citywide departments and
programs on an as-needed basis. Examples include special folding, cutting,
laminating, and binding for public awareness and training initiatives, including pocket-
sized brochures on domestic violence safety plans, transit route schedules, large
reference guides, manuals, and other unique items.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
UKG, Inc.

For $154,000 in payment authority for UKG Telestaff workforce management system
software support and Cloud hosting for the Phoenix Fire Department. UKG Telestaff is
an industry standard product used by the Phoenix Fire Department to schedule first
responders and emergency dispatchers. This application is widely used by public
safety agencies across the country to ensure required daily staffing levels are met.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Voyager Fleet Systems, Inc. Fuel Cards

For $1,150,000 in payment authority to process monthly invoices from Voyager Fleet
Systems, Inc., a disregarded entity of US Bank NA, for a term of five years for the
Police Department. The Department requires Voyager Fleet Program fuel credit cards
when traveling outside the City limits or to purchase premium fuel that is not available
at City fueling stations. Funding is available in the Police Department's budget.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Settlement of Claim(s) Diosdado v. City of Phoenix

To make payment of up to $3,000,000 in settlement of claim(s) in Diosdado v. City of
Phoenix, CV2024-015694, 23-0673, AU, BI, for Finance Department pursuant to
Phoenix City Code Chapter 42. This is a settlement of a claim involving the Public
Works Department that occurred on February 15, 2024.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Employee Group Life, Accidental Death and Dismemberment and Occupational
Life insurance - RFP HR 20-106 - Amendment (Ordinance S-51684) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 152644 with Minnesota Life Insurance Company to extend the contract term
and add additional expenditures. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed
$5,000,000.

Summary
This contract is for Employee Group Life, Accidental Death and Dismemberment and
Occupational Life insurance. The contract provides a variety of life insurance plans for
the contract term and secure additional funds in order to have additional time to
conduct a procurement process. This extension will provide City employees
continuous access to insurance products offered by Minnesota Life Insurance
Company.

Contract Term
Upon approval the contract will be extended through December 31, 2026.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $5,000,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $27,000,000. Funds are available in the Human Resources
Department’s budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:

• Employee Group Life, Accidental Death and Dismemberment and Occupational Life
insurance Contract 152644 (Ordinance S-46758) on June 17, 2020.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Human Resources
Department.





Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Fence Supply and Services - RFQu 23-0170 - Amendment (Ordinance S-51685) -
Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 159628 with L.P. Steel Industries, LLC, Contract 159630
with Phoenix Fence Company, and Contract 159629 with Western Fence Co., Inc. for
the purchase of fence supply and services for Citywide use. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional
expenditures will not exceed $12,182,000.

Summary
These contracts will provide all materials, labor, equipment, permits, and services
necessary for the new construction, repairs, and maintenance of existing fences
throughout the City. Additionally, services will include installing permanent and
temporary fencing; replacing, furnishing, fabricating, and installing fencing; and
repairing block, ornamental, chain-link, or any combination of fencing Citywide on an
as-needed basis. In addition, fencing provided though these contracts will also be used
to secure City-operated construction sites and to routinely protect the City's facilities
from vandalism and theft.

Contract Term
The contracts' term remains unchanged, ending on December 14, 2028.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $12,182,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contracts will not exceed $18,682,000. Funds are available in the various departments'
budgets.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Fence Supply and Services - Contracts 159628, 159629, and 159630 (Ordinance S-
50352) on November 15, 2023.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.





Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Traffic Signal Poles and Components - CO-OP 20-083 - Amendment (Ordinance S
-51693) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under the following contracts for the purchase of traffic signal poles and
components for the Street Transportation Department: 152961 with Sierra
Transportation & Technologies, LLC; 152993 with Iteris, Inc.; 152991 with Advanced
Traffic Products, Inc.; 152971 with Econolite Control Products, Inc.; 152962 with Solar
Traffic Controls, LLC; 152959 with Wesco Distribution Inc. dba Brown Wholesale
Electric CO.; and 152955 with AM Signal, LLC. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not
exceed $3,000,000.

Summary
These contracts supply traffic signal poles and components necessary for the
maintenance of over 1,200 traffic signalized intersections. The additional funds will be
used to purchase traffic signal related components required for capital improvement
and grant-funded projects, intersection upgrades and remodels, and replacement of
existing poles due to aging and damage.

Contract Term
The contracts term will remain unchanged, ending on June 30, 2025.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $3,000,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contracts will not exceed $10,000,000. Funds are available in the Street Transportation
Department’s budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Traffic Signal Poles and Components Contracts 152971, 152991, 152955, 152993,
152961, 152962, and 152959 (Ordinance S-46788) on June 24, 2020.
· Traffic Signal Poles and Components Contracts 152971, 152991, 152955, 152993,
152961, 152962, and 152959 (Ordinance S-50630) on March 6, 2024.



Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson and the Street
Transportation Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acceptance and Dedication of a Deed for Roadway Purposes (Ordinance S-
51694) - District 4

Request for the City Council to accept and dedicate a deed for roadway purposes;
further ordering the ordinance recorded. Legal descriptions are recorded via separate
recording instrument.

Summary
Accepting the property interests below meets the requirement of the Planning and
Development Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process prior to releasing
any permits to applicants.

Deed (a)
MCR: 20250029104
Applicant and Grantor: Alhambra School District No. 68; its successor and assigns
Date: January 17, 2025
Purpose: Roadway
Location: 5330 N. 23rd Avenue
APN: 153-21-002
File: 240103
Council District: 4

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development and Finance departments.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Janitorial and Sanitation Supplies, Equipment and Related Services -
Amendment (Ordinance S-51695) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 153697 with WAXIE Sanitary Supply for additional expenditures and an entity
name change to Waxie's Enterprises, LLC dba WAXIE Sanitary Supply, a BradyPLUS
company and disregarded entity of Brady Acqco., LLC. Further request to authorize
the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional
expenditures will not exceed $6,245,535.

Summary
This contract provides janitorial, sanitation supplies and equipment for departments
Citywide. The contract allows for departments Citywide to purchase janitorial and
sanitation supplies required for the daily operational needs of each department.
Approval is requested to amend the contract accordingly and continue receiving
janitorial supplies and equipment from Waxie's Enterprises, LLC dba WAXIE Sanitary
Supply, a BradyPLUS company and disregarded entity of Brady Acqco., LLC.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on November 30, 2025.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $6,245,535 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $22,545,535. Funds are available in the various departments'
budgets.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action

The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Janitorial Supplies for City Departments - Contract 153697 (Ordinance S-47033) on
November 4, 2020.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.






Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Fleet Management Technologies with Related Software Solutions for Heavy-Duty
Vehicles COOP 23-042 - Amendment (Ordinance S-51699) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 158354 with Rubicon Global, LLC for an assignment from Rubicon Global,
LLC to Wastech Corp. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. No additional funds are needed; request to continue using
ordinance S-49672.

Summary
This contract provides specialized solid waste collections software platform and Smart
Cities capabilities. Utilizing this technology, the Public Works Department receives
confirmation on collections, turn-by-turn routing, route optimization, and equipment
records compliance (pre-trip and post-trip inspections) and provides citywide problem
log recording capabilities, eliminating paper driver logs.

The assignment from Rubicon Global, LLC to Wastech Corp., is due to a change in
ownership. The assignment allows the City to continue receiving the necessary
services to maintain these critical operations.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on May 2, 2028.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contract will not exceed $3,780,000 and no additional
funds are needed.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
•Fleet Management Technology for Heavy Duty Vehicles, Contract 158354 (Ordinance
S-49672) on May 3, 2023.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Public Works
Department.





Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acceptance of Easements for Drainage Purposes (Ordinance S-51702) - District

Request for the City Council to accept easements for drainage purposes; further
ordering the ordinance recorded. Legal descriptions are recorded via separate
recording instrument.

Summary
Accepting the property interests below meets the requirement of the Planning and
Development Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process prior to releasing
any permits to applicants.

Easement (a)
MCR: 20250047307
Applicant and Grantor: LDR-Sonoran Parkway, L.L.C.; its successor and assigns
Date: January 28, 2025
Purpose: Drainage
Location: 31200 N. North Valley Parkway
APN: 204-13-612
File: 240102
Council District: 2

Easement (b)
MCR: 20250068347
Applicant and Grantor: CWS Bronco Butte MF, L.P; CWS Bronco Placeholder, LLC;
their successor and assigns
Date: February 7, 2025
Purpose: Drainage
Location: 31925 N. 29th Avenue
APN: 204-11-010
File: 240071
Council District: 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and



Development and Finance departments.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Office Supplies and Service Contract - COOP-25-0513 Request for Award
(Ordinance S-51703) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contracts with
ODP Business Solutions, LLC and Wist Supply & Equipment Co. dba Wist Business
Supplies & Equipment to provide office supplies and service for the Citywide
departments. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total value of the contracts will not exceed $8,300,000.

Summary
These contracts will provide the City with office supplies, which support the needs of
the City's employees, facilities, and warehouses and the public. Office supplies include
but are not limited to adhesives, binders, book cases, garbage bags, dusters,
notebooks, pens, and other miscellaneous supplies set forth in the contracts and
required for the City to remain operational on a daily basis.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reason:
Special Circumstances Alternative Competition. The contracts were awarded through a
competitive process consistent with the City's procurement processes, as outlined in
Phoenix City Code, Chapter 43. By utilizing the State of Oregon's National Association
of State Procurement Officials Master Agreement (NASPO), the City benefits from the
NASPO cooperative contract rates adopted through the State of Arizona Participating
Agreement.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about April 1, 2025, for a five-year term with no options to
extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contracts will not exceed $8,300,000 for the five-year
aggregate term.

Funding is available in the various departments' operating budgets.




Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Signage - COOP 20-061 - Amendment (Ordinance S-51705) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 151898 with Duncor, L.L.C. dba Summit West Signs for
the purchase of signage for Citywide departments. Further request to authorize the
City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures
will not exceed $75,000.

Summary
This contract will provide exterior and interior signage and fulfill the needs of all
Citywide departments. Signs include, but are not limited to: ADA-compliant signage,
room and directional signage, indoor and outdoor building signage, letters of all types,
logs, plaques, and banners. The primary departments utilizing the contract are Public
Works, Fire, and Planning and Development. Additional funds are needed due to
usage that has been higher than anticipated.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on March 31, 2025.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $75,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $275,000. Funds are available in the budgets of various
departments.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Signage Contract 151898 (Ordinance S-46405) on March 4, 2020.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Uninterruptible Power Supply Equipment, Service and Maintenance - IFB 17-171 -
Amendment (Ordinance S-51709) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 145554 with Titan Power, Inc. and Contract 145555 with
Gruber Technical, Inc. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $580,000.

Summary
This contract will provide uninterruptible power supply (UPS) equipment and
associated services and maintenance, which are vital for the City's various services
that require constant, uninterrupted power. The UPS units supply power in the event of
an outage, which allows continued operations until power resumes. Some critical
operations include 911 call centers, Citywide data rooms, and water production and
distribution functions. The additional funds will be used by the City's various
departments for the remainder of the contract term.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on June 30, 2025.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $580,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $5,970,000. Funds are available in the various departments'
budgets.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
•Uninterruptible Power Supply Equipment, Service and Maintenance 145554, 145555
Ordinance S-43740 on June 28, 2017.
•Uninterruptible Power Supply Equipment, Service and Maintenance 145554, 145555
Ordinance S-45948 on August 28, 2019.
•Uninterruptible Power Supply Equipment, Service and Maintenance 145554, 145555
Ordinance S-48753 on June 15, 2022.
•Uninterruptible Power Supply Equipment, Service and Maintenance 145554, 145555
Ordinance S-49753 on May 31, 2023.



•Uninterruptible Power Supply Equipment, Service and Maintenance 145554, 145555
Ordinance S-49995 June 28, 2023.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Maintenance, Repair and Operating Supplies and Services - 16154RFP -
Amendment (Ordinance S-51713) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendment(s) to
contract 146367 with HD Supply Facilities Maintenance, Ltd. to extend the contract
term and allow additional expenditures. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not
exceed $2,600,000.

Summary
This contract provides building materials, hardware, plumbing supplies, metals, tools,
electrical, and other facility operation products and equipment on an as-needed basis.
The contract is available for Citywide use with primary users being Housing, Parks and
Recreation, and Public Works departments.

Contract Term
Upon approval, the contract will be extended through December 31, 2026, with a one-
year option to extend.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $2,600,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $7,600,000. Funds are available in the various departments'
budgets.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Maintenance, Repair and Operating Supplies and Services, Contract 146367,
Ordinance S-43967 on October 18, 2017;
• Maintenance, Repair and Operating Supplies and Services, Contract 146367,
Ordinance S-49093 on October 26, 2022;
• Maintenance, Repair and Operating Supplies and Services, Contract 146367,
Ordinance S-50274 on October 18, 2023;
• Maintenance, Repair and Operating Supplies and Services, Contract 146367,
Ordinance S-51322 on October 16, 2024.




Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Firefighter Equipment Contracts RFP 24-0108 - Request for Award (Ordinance S-
51719) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contracts with 15
vendors as listed in Attachment A to provide firefighter equipment and other related
products and services for the Phoenix Fire Department and various departments
Citywide. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related
to this item. The total value of the contracts will not exceed $25,350,000.

Summary
These contracts will supply essential firefighting equipment and other related products
and services, including extraction/attack tools, fire extinguishers, search and rescue
equipment, apparel, hoses, and personal protective equipment. By providing cutting-
edge solutions to the Phoenix Fire Department, and various other departments, these
contracts will bolster the City's operational capabilities by enabling effective responses
to diverse emergencies and outfitting seven new fire stations with required
commodities to embark on service. These contracts allow access to products and
services required for the ongoing safety and well-being of both City staff and the
Phoenix community.

Procurement Information
A Request for Proposal procurement was processed in accordance with City of
Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Twenty-two vendors submitted proposals deemed responsive and responsible. An
evaluation committee evaluated those offers based on the following criteria with a
maximum possible point total of 1,000:

Method of Approach - 350 points
Capacity - 300 points
Experience - 200 points
Price - 150 points

After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to 15
vendors. The Offerors selected for award are included in Attachment A.




Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about March 15, 2025, for a five-year term with no
options to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contracts value will not exceed $25,350,000.

Funding is available in various departments' operating budgets.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.





ATTACHMENT A




Legistar File No.: 25-0281


Firefighter Equipment Citywide– Requirements Contract RFP
24-0108 – Request for Award
After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following vendor(s):

VENDOR

030530 Uniforms, LLC

Atlas Packs, LLC

Extrication Concepts LLC

Ferno Washington, INC

FSN Utah, LLC

Galls, LLC

Flight Suits dba Gibson & Barnes

Life-Assist, Incorporated

L.N. Curtis & Sons, INC.

Matlick Enterprises, INC.

Municipal Emergency Services, INC.

Philips Healthcare LLC

Safeware Safety Supplies INC

Sea-Western, INC.

Skaggs Companies, INC.







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Intergovernmental Agreement for Phoenix Radio Shop Services to the City of
Tolleson (Ordinance S-51712) - District 7

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an
intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with the City of Tolleson to provide public safety
subscriber equipment maintenance services on an as-needed basis. Further request to
authorize the City Treasurer to accept, and for the City Controller to disburse, all funds
related to this item. This agreement will have no financial impact on the City of
Phoenix.

Summary
The cities of Tolleson and Phoenix have agreed to enter into an intergovernmental
agreement to provide radio equipment maintenance and repair services. This
agreement will incur no financial impact to Phoenix as Tolleson agrees to pay the cost
for all services and parts. Tolleson will pay the costs for services rendered on each unit
repaired on a time and material basis.This IGA will authorize Phoenix to charge a labor
fee to Tolleson for any radio equipment maintenance and repair services. Additionally,
Tolleson will reimburse Phoenix at a fair market rate for the cost of any materials or
parts necessary to repair the unit.

Contract Term
This agreement will commence on or about March 14, 2025, and thereafter will be
automatically renewed each year for successive one-year terms. The cities of Phoenix
and Tolleson may discontinue the agreement upon reasonable notice.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City of Phoenix.

Location
The City of Phoenix will perform services on site at the service center located at 2441
S. 22nd Avenue.
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson and the Information



Technology Services Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Request for Reconsideration of Item 37 from the February 19, 2025 Formal
Council Meeting - Authorization to Grant a Temporary Access Easement to CPLC
Broadway and Central LIHTC, LLC for the Pueblo Apartments (Ordinance S-
15673) - District 7

Request for reconsideration of Item 37 - Authorization to Grant a Temporary Access
Easement to CPLC Broadway and Central LIHTC, LLC for the Pueblo Apartments
(Ordinance S-15673) to be placed on the agenda for the Formal City Council meeting
on March 5, 2025.

Summary
At the February 19, 2025 Formal City Council meeting, Item 37 - Authorization to Grant
a Temporary Access Easement to CPLC Broadway and Central LIHTC, LLC for the
Pueblo Apartments (Ordinance S-15673) was continued to the April 9, 2025 Formal

Pursuant to the Rules of Council Proceedings Rule 7(n), this reconsideration is being
placed on the March 5, 2025 agenda in accordance with a memo requesting
reconsideration from Councilman Galindo-Elvira (Attachment A) filed with the City
Clerk on February 26, 2025.

If this request is approved, the City Council will reconsider this item. If this request is
not approved, the City Council will not reconsider this item and the original action on
the item will stand.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Reconsideration of Item 37 from the February 19, 2025 Formal Council Meeting -
Authorization to Grant a Temporary Access Easement to CPLC Broadway and
Central LIHTC, LLC for the Pueblo Apartments (Ordinance S-51673) - District 7

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to grant a temporary access
easement to CPLC Broadway and Central LIHTC, LLC (CPLC) for ingress and egress
to the Pueblo Apartments for consideration in the amount of the appraised value and
other consideration. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept all funds
related to this item.

Summary
CPLC's Pueblo Apartment project at 316 W. Broadway Road is inaccessible from
Broadway Road because of an open SRP irrigation ditch. The Planning and
Development Department has stipulated that the project (KIVA 18-830) relocate and
pipe the open irrigation ditch for permanent direct access from Broadway Road. The
City will convey a temporary access easement across the adjacent City-owned
property to the east for ingress and egress to the apartments during reconstruction of
the SRP facilities. The temporary access does not negatively impact the use of the City
-owned property. This easement will be an approximate two-year duration and will be
terminated upon completion of the permanent driveway.

The temporary access easement is located within City-owned property, identified by
Maricopa County Assessor parcel number 113-07-124.

Location
Near the northwest corner of S. Central Avenue and W. Broadway Road.
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Public Transit
and Finance departments.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
(CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 4, 2024 AND FEBRUARY 19, 2025) - Loan
Federal HOME-ARP Funds for Tanner Thomas Village Affordable Housing
Development Project (Ordinance S-51500) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an Affordable
Housing Loan Program agreement for up to $2,365,349 in federal U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD) HOME Investment Partnerships American
Rescue Plan (HOME-ARP) program funds with Tanner Community Development, or a
City-approved nominee, for the Tanner Thomas Village affordable housing
development project, and to take all actions and execute all documents to complete
the loan. Authorization is also requested for the City Controller to disburse the funds
for the life of the contract. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Summary
On June 6, 2024, the Housing Department issued a HOME-ARP Notice of Funding
Opportunity (NOFO) for Non-Congregate Shelter and Rental Housing acquisition,
rehabilitation, and/or new construction projects to reduce homelessness and increase
housing stability. A NOFO Pre-Submittal Workshop was held on July 11, 2024.
Applications were due on August 30, 2024.

Procurement Information
Three proposals for Rental Housing acquisition were received and reviewed by an
evaluation committee comprised of the City's staff members representing various
departments. The proposals were evaluated on a 1,000-point scale based on the
following criteria: Operations; How Well the Project Addressed the Strategies to
Address Homelessness Plan; Organization Capacity; and Project Readiness. The
following were recommended for funding:

· St. Catherine Manor (Housing for Hope, LLC/Catholic Charities) - 870 points
· Tanner Thomas Village (Tanner Community Development) - 803 points
· Senior Bridge (Steel+Spark) - 790 points

Tanner Thomas Village, located at 1803 E. Broadway Road (District 8), consists of 37
permanent supportive housing units for previously homeless veterans. The 37
permanent supportive housing units will serve veterans with Area Median Income


(AMI) levels at or below 30 percent. Residents will receive supportive services through
Tanner Community Development’s on-site Community Resource Center, where health
care navigation and equity, supplemental nutrition support, human and social services,
economic self-sufficiency, and workforce development services will be provided.
Additional project funding in the following amounts have been secured by the
developer:

· HUD Economic Development Initiative - $2,883,950
· State of Arizona Governor’s Office - $271,851

Project awards are contingent on full underwriting, environmental release of funds,
commitments of other financing, and availability of federal funds. The overall loan
structure will be consistent with the terms listed in the NOFO and HOME-ARP
Program requirements.

Financial Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund. HOME-ARP is a federally funded program.
Funding for this NOFO is made available from HOME-ARP funds. Funding is budgeted
in the Housing Department’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget. Loan
execution is anticipated for Fiscal Year 2024-25, and the loan will be paid to the
developer during the construction period.

Public Outreach
As part of the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan's process, HUD required extensive public
outreach to formulate the plan. Housing staff conducted six virtual listening sessions
for community stakeholders and interviewed numerous service agencies and housing
providers directly. More than 66 agencies participated in interviews and listening
sessions during this process. This public input was used to draft the HOME-ARP
Allocation Plan and inform the design of the NOFO to address the most critical needs
of the community.

As part of the formal adoption process, the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan was made
public, providing for a 15-day public comment period. The City published a 15-day
comment period and public hearing notice in the Arizona Republic on August 29, 2022.
A virtual public hearing was held to provide an opportunity for public comment on
September 12, 2022. The public comment period was open from September 13 to
September 27, 2022. City Council approved the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan on
November 16, 2022. The HOME-ARP Allocation Plan was approved by HUD on
February 6, 2023.




Location
1803 E. Broadway Road
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Housing
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Office of Heat Response and Mitigation Tree Stewards Program (Ordinance S-
51715) - Citywide

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into one grant
agreement with one grantee to disburse funds for a new Tree Stewards Program.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. There is no impact to the General Fund. Funding is available from the U.S
Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service through the Urban and Community
Forestry (UCF) Grant allocated to the City under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The
aggregate expenditures will not exceed $2 million.

Summary
Increasing urban tree canopy cover is an important public health strategy that supports
the core value of the 2025 General Plan to build the most sustainable desert city. In
November 2024, City Council unanimously adopted the Shade Phoenix Plan, which
guides the implementation of more than 30 unique strategies and programs to provide
more tree and shade coverage throughout the city. Several actions in the Shade
Phoenix Plan are funded by a $10 million Urban and Community Forestry Grant
awarded to the City by the USDA. On October 4, 2023, City Council authorized the
distribution of $10 million from the USDA’s Forest Service Urban and Community
Forestry Grant through the IRA to the City's Office of Heat Response and Mitigation
(OHRM) for the creation of grant and community impact programs.

To increase the tree shade canopy in disadvantaged neighborhoods, OHRM is seeking
authorization to use up to $2 million of USDA grant funds to implement a grant to start
a new Tree Stewards Program. With the increased number of trees being planted
throughout the City of Phoenix, a reliable, long-term solution for maintenance is
paramount. The program will hire, train, and pay at least 10 tree stewards, who will
coordinate education, planting, and maintenance efforts to communities in grant
eligible neighborhoods for five years. It will provide workforce training and jobs to
residents of diverse backgrounds and provide tree maintenance assistance to
community members. The benefit to the community will be evaluated yearly and the
findings will be used to fine tune the program as it continues. No more than $2 million
will be committed for the Tree Stewards Program.




The Tree Steward Grant will be open to existing organizations, including but not limited
to nonprofits with relevant experience with tree planting projects and maintenance in
underserved neighborhoods. The Tree Stewards Program created through the City’s
IRA grant will be designed in coordination with related efforts in neighboring
municipalities. OHRM will closely coordinate with the granted organization in order to
administer this program. OHRM staff will accept and review applications, award the
organization best suited to implement this grant, and ensure that all funding will be
spent by the end of June 2029 to comply with IRA requirements.

Financial Impact
Funding for this program will not exceed $2 million. There is no impact to the General
Fund. Funding is available through the IRA from the USDA Forest Service.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Office of Heat
Response and Mitigation.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Amend Contract with Vision Building Rentals, LLC to Extend
the Term and Increase Pay Authority (Ordinance S-51707) - District 7

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to increase funding in the
amount of $250,000 for Contract 160860 with Vision Building Rentals, LLC for a total
new contract value not to exceed $2,750,000 and to extend the term of the contract
through April 21, 2025, to allow for administrative closeout of the contract. Further
request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item for
the life of the contract. Funds are available from the City’s allocation of the American
Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds.

Summary
The City of Phoenix Office of Homeless Solutions (OHS) seeks to provide additional
contract funding to Vision Building Rentals, LLC for the continued rental of various
equipment, including a temporary shelter structure to provide congregate shelter for up
to 100 individuals experiencing homelessness while the permanent shelter structure
and larger portion of the 71st Avenue Navigation Center is completed. This temporary
structure allows for the City to offer respite, sleeping quarters, and services
infrastructure for individuals experiencing homelessness within the City and will
continue to support the City of Phoenix in offering a regional approach to providing
emergency shelter and homeless services.

Contract Term
Upon approval, the term of the contract will be extended through April 21, 2025, to
allow for administrative closeout of contract.

Financial Impact
The total value of this contract shall not exceed $2,750,000. Funding is available
through the City's ARPA allocation.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Contract 160860 with Ordinance S-50943 on May 29,
2024.

Location



11 S. 71 Avenue
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Office of
Homeless Solutions.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Amend Contract 160325 with Human Services Campus, Inc. dba
Keys to Change to Increase Authority (Ordinance S-51710) - District 7

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Contract
160325 with Human Services Campus, Inc. dba Keys to Change to increase funding
up to $250,000 for overflow shelter operations. The new total contract value will not
exceed $2,375,000. Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item for the life of the contract. Funds are available from the Office
of Homeless Solutions's general funds.

Summary
Keys to Change provides essential services and homeless program operations for
unsheltered individuals experiencing homelessness, 365 days per year, 7 days per
week, and 24 hours per day, including holidays. Directly and through its 16 partners,
the Keys Campus provides shelter, food, navigation, case management, postal
services, workforce development, and housing, among other services. Keys to Change
recognizes the urgent need for providing essential services to individuals experiencing
homelessness and is committed to providing services aligned with the City of
Phoenix’s Strategies to Address Homelessness Plan. The agency’s programs include
services for the homeless that serve thousands each day and provide general
assistance for individuals in need. The additional funding will be used for expenses
related to the operations of overflow shelter beds in the Lodestar Day Resource Center
and St. Vincent de Paul dining hall on campus.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged.

Financial Impact
The new total value of this contract shall not exceed $2,375,000. The additional
$250,000 is available in the Office of Homeless Solutions' general fund budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Contract 160325 with Ordinance S-50614 on February 21,
2024.




Location
220 S. 12th Avenue
District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Office of
Homeless Solutions.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Request to Enter into an Agreement with Housing for Hope, Inc. (Ordinance S-
51717) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Housing for Hope, Inc. to fund the acquisition and supporting improvements of a
safe house for pregnant women experiencing abuse. The total value of the agreement
will not exceed $600,000. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse
all funds related to this item. Funding is available from Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) entitlement. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Summary
The Neighborhood Services Department's (NSD) Neighborhood Enhancement and
Infrastructure Program, funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD), provides grant funds to non-profit organizations for critical
projects that provide a public benefit to Phoenix residents with low-and-moderate
incomes.

Housing for Hope, Inc., a subsidiary of Catholic Charities Community Services,
requested funds to acquire a single-family residential home to use as a safe house for
pregnant women. The safe house will be an emergency resource for pregnant women
leaving an unstable or unsafe environment due to emotional and/or physical domestic
violence. Additionally, the safe house will provide wrap-around services, including
meals, clothing, supplies, counseling, and referrals to community services. The safe
house will assist in preventing homelessness by offering a short-term stay, 30 to 90
days, while permanent housing is arranged.

The project will support the City's responses to domestic violence and homelessness
by providing an additional solution that prevents homelessness that could otherwise be
experienced by pregnant women, and their children, escaping domestic violence.

Contract Term
The 12-month agreement term will begin on or about March 15, 2025, with an option to
extend for six months, that may be exercised at the discretion of the City Manager, or
designee.




Financial Impact
Funding is available in the Neighborhood Services Department's Neighborhood
Enhancement and Infrastructure Program Budget using HUD CDBG funds. There is no
impact to the General Fund.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the
Neighborhood Services Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Regency Garage - Authorization to Issue Disposition and Redevelopment
Solicitation - District 7

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to issue a Request for
Proposals (RFP) for the disposition and redevelopment of the City-owned Regency
Garage located at the southwest corner of 2nd and Adams streets for a mixed-use
development project and authorization to begin negotiations with the recommended
proposer.

Summary
The City owns the Regency Parking Garage located at the southwest corner of 2nd
and Adams streets (Site), on a property comprised of approximately 0.95 acres in
Downtown Phoenix. The Site is zoned Downtown Code - Business Core. This parking
garage was built in 1972 and contains 506 parking spaces with 22,753 square feet
(SF) of leasable ground floor commercial space. Currently, the Arizona Latino Arts &
Cultural Center occupies approximately 8,000 SF of commercial/storage space on a
month-to-month agreement. The Site also is subject to three active parking
agreements.

On March 20, 2019, the City Council authorized a solicitation for the disposition and
development of the Site; however, negotiations with the recommended proposer were
mutually terminated in 2020 due to market uncertainty resulting from the COVID-19
Pandemic. In 2019, the Greater Phoenix Convention and Visitors Bureau (Visit
Phoenix) and the Phoenix Convention Center Department commissioned the
consulting firm of Convention Sports and Leisure (CS&L) to assess the market
feasibility for the Phoenix Convention Center (PCC) and surrounding hospitality
assets. The study was updated in 2022 to account for the Pandemic's impact on the
tourism and hospitality industry. The consultant outlined three key recommendations
necessary to support the long term needs of the PCC, one of which was to increase
the surrounding convention hotel inventory by 800 - 1,200 hotel rooms. In 2024, Visit
Phoenix commissioned a study to analyze downtown hotel room needs. The study
acknowledges the near-term need for full service hotel rooms. Staff recommends
disposition of the Site as it is not necessary for PCC operations and can be
redeveloped into a mixed-use, full-service hotel development to support continued
growth of the City's convention business.




With approval, the Community and Economic Development Department will issue a
solicitation seeking proposals for redevelopment of the Site. Proposers will be required
to propose a hotel development and demonstrate experience successfully completing
at least one vertical, mixed-use development of at least seven stories within the last
five years. Proposers may offer a combination of public benefit or cash compensation
for the fair market value of the Site. The RFP will seek proposals that:

· Provide a full-service hotel with no fewer than approximately 400 guest rooms.
· Capitalize on the Site's prominent downtown location and proximity to the PCC.
· Support the long term expansion needs of the PCC and the City's convention and
visitor industry.
· Implement the Adams Street Activation Study recommendations and other relevant
City plans.
· Are consistent with the Downtown Strategic Plan goals.

Procurement Information
Responsive proposals will be evaluated by a panel including City staff and community
representatives. The evaluation criteria will be:

Concept to Activate the Site 0-375 points
Return to the City 0-350 points
Proposer's Qualifications and Experience 0-275 points

Following negotiations with the recommended proposer, staff will present business
terms to the Economic Development and Housing Subcommittee for review and
recommendation and subsequently to the full City Council for approval.

Financial Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund as a result of this action.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item was recommended for approval at the Economic Development and Housing
Subcommittee meeting on February 12, 2025, by a vote of 3-0.

Public Outreach
Staff presented information to the Downtown Core Community Association on January
5, 2025, and has offered information to the Downtown Voices Coalition and the
Downtown Phoenix Inc. Stakeholders Open House.




Location
Southwest corner of 2nd and Adams streets.
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan, the Community and
Economic Development and Phoenix Convention Center departments.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend Contracts with Gordon C. James Public Relations, Inc. and Phoenix IG,
LLC - Contracts 160200 and 162011 - Metro District (Ordinance S-51708) - District

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend the not to exceed
amount of Contract 160200 with Gordon C. James Public Relations, Inc. (Consultant)
to $375,000. Consultant provides community organizing services for the Metro District
Community Collaboration (Metro District) 501(c)(3) organization. Staff also requests
further authorization to amend Contract 162011 with Phoenix IG, LLC (Developer), or
its designee, for cost sharing purposes and authorization to receive and disburse funds
related to this item. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept, and the
City Controller to disburse, all funds related to this item. There is no impact to the
General Fund.

Summary
In March 2024, City Council authorized staff to contract with the Consultant for a one-
year contract, with two one-year renewal options, for a maximum value of $125,000
(Ordinance S-50656). With the same action, City Council also authorized staff to
receive funding from the Developer to equally share the costs of the Consultant's
contract. This funding was intended for the initial year of the contract.

The Consultant has satisfactorily performed the scope of work included in the contract
to enhance public safety and build business relationships as well as market and
promote the Metro District. Furthermore, the Consultant has filed a 501(c)(3)
application for the Metro District with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, which should
be finalized this year allowing for tax deductible contributions to the non-profit. For
these reasons, staff and the Developer wish to exercise the option for the next year of
the Consultant's contract, beginning April 8, 2025, and receive authorization to add
$250,000 of payment authority for a new $375,000 total aggregate contract amount.
The original contract authority and renewal options will remain the same, with all
contract options expiring April 7, 2027. The Developer will continue to share 50 percent
of the contract costs with the City under the funding agreement.

Over the final two option years of the contract, the Consultant will work to execute a
fundraising plan with the goal of making the non-profit financially self-sufficient without



City support.

Contract Term
The initial one-year term of the contract expires on April 7, 2025. There are two one-
year renewal options.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $375,000. A total of 50 percent of the
funds are available in the Downtown Community Reinvestment Fund, with an
additional 50 percent of funds contributed by the Developer. Developer will pay its
contribution directly to the City.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
2024.

Location
The Metro District boundaries are: Peoria Avenue, Interstate 17, Dunlap Avenue and
31st Avenue
Council District: 1

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Community and
Economic Development Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Amend Development Agreement with PV Land SPE, LLC
(Ordinance S-51714) - District 3

Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Contract 154095 with PV Land
SPE, LLC (Developer), or its City-approved designee, to extend the term of the
reimbursement period.

Summary
The City and Developer entered into a development agreement (Agreement) in 2021
to facilitate the demolition and redevelopment of the former Paradise Valley Mall into a
mixed-use development (Project). The Agreement allows for reimbursement by the
City of certain public improvements constructed by the Developer utilizing the general
fund (GF) share of Project-generated transaction privilege tax (TPT).

Following the completion of demolition and commencement of construction in 2022, a
new state law, SB 1131, was passed in 2023 prohibiting municipalities from collecting
a residential rental tax, effective January 1, 2025. Reimbursement of the residential
rental tax was forecasted over a period of 25 years under the Agreement and was part
of the Developer’s financial assumptions for constructing the Project.

In 2024, City Council authorized an amendment to allow the use of restricted Non-GF
share of TPT generated on-site to reimburse for public infrastructure constructed on
the site. The parties would like to extend the reimbursement term of the Agreement
from 25 years to 30 years to make up for additional lost revenue from the elimination of
the residential rental tax. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement will remain in
full force and effect.

Financial Impact
Project-generated TPT is only available for actual public infrastructure and amenities
completed by the Developer and accepted by the City for a 30-year term.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
On February 17, 2021, City Council approved Contract 154095 (Ordinance S-47323).
On June 26, 2024, City Council approved an amendment authorizing Non-GF TPT as
reimbursable (Ordinance S-51125).




Location
4500 - 4610 East Cactus Road
Council District: 3

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Community and
Economic Development Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amendment to the Downtown Redevelopment Area Boundary (Resolution 22280)
- District 7

Request to adopt a resolution to amend the Downtown Redevelopment Area boundary
by removing a City-owned parcel.

Summary
The Downtown Redevelopment Area (RDA) was established on January 30, 1979, by
Resolution 15128 and has been amended multiple times, most recently on June 8,
2020, by Resolution 21832. The RDA Plan provides a broad framework for the
development of the area and lists specific redevelopment objectives. These basic
redevelopment objectives include:

1. Remove substandard, deteriorating and obsolescent buildings.
2. Encourage physical and economic growth of Downtown Phoenix.
3. Assemble land into parcels for disposition and redevelopment.
4. Provide safe, efficient and attractive circulation and access systems to Downtown
Phoenix.
5. Increase the housing supply.
6. Provide adequate public services and facilities to meet the needs of the downtown
area, the City and region.

The City has taken many actions over the years to achieve these objectives.
Downtown Phoenix has seen a significant increase in residential housing and new
educational and employment opportunities, and is home to many cultural venues and
events. One City-owned parcel within the RDA, as depicted in Attachment A and
legally described in Attachment B, has met these objectives and can now be removed
from the RDA. The removal of this parcel is a minor amendment to the RDA boundary
and will not impact any other parcel/property owner.

Financial Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund as a result of this action.

Public Outreach
Public notice is not statutorily required under Arizona Revised Statute 36-1473.




Location
Northeast corner of Central Avenue and Portland Street. Assessor's Parcel Number
(APN): 111-36-081A.
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Community and
Economic Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A
Site Map




Site




ATTACHMENT B
Legal Description of Site to be Removed







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Enter into an Agreement with U.S. Department of Agriculture for
Police Services (Ordinance S-51718) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow the Police
Department to enter into an agreement with the U.S. Department of Agriculture - Office
of Inspector General (OIG) to reimburse the Police Department up to $12,000 for
police services. Further request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and for
the City Controller to disburse, all funds related to this item.

Summary
The purpose of this agreement is to receive reimbursement for police services
associated with joint law enforcement operations involving Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program (SNAP) fraud. The goal is to identify and locate individuals and
businesses involved in SNAP fraud, conduct investigations, and effectuate
prosecution. In turn, the OIG will reimburse the Police Department for police overtime
incurred in support of the investigations. The OIG will not reimburse fringe benefits
associated with the overtime; therefore, the Police Department will absorb those
expenditures.

Contract Term
Date of execution through September 30, 2025.

Financial Impact
The U.S. Department of Agriculture - Office of Inspector General will reimburse the
Police Department up to $12,000. The Police Department's budget will absorb the
fringe benefits associated with the overtime related to the investigations.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Apply For, Accept and Enter Into an Agreement for the Arizona
State Crisis Intervention Program (AzSCIP) Grant Program (Ordinance S-51720) -
Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow the Police
Department to apply for, accept, and enter into an agreement for state grant funds
through the Arizona Criminal Justice Commission's Arizona State Crisis Intervention
Program (AzSCIP). Funding provided under this grant will not exceed $500,000.
Further request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller
to disburse, all funds related to this item.

Summary
The purpose of this Program is to prevent or reduce gun-related crime and violence,
as well as improve the functioning of the criminal justice system, by supporting
innovative and evidence-based practices, more effective information sharing, and multi
-agency collaboration. Funding will support projects that will create and implement
state crisis intervention court proceedings and related gun violence reduction
programs and initiatives. All projects must have a direct connection to crisis
intervention, which is focused on identifying risk and intervening before harm occurs.
Through financial support for innovative, evidence-based projects at all levels of the
state, AzSCIP will work to mitigate gun violence, preserve lives by diminishing gun-
related fatalities, and decrease the frequency of gun-related injuries.

The Police Department will use this grant funding to mitigate gun violence in Phoenix
by partnering with an external mental health service provider to provide peer support
navigation services to high-risk individuals, which will increase the availability and
accessibility of crisis intervention services. This community-based firearm death and
injury reduction effort will focus on identifying risk and intervening before harm occurs.
The funding will help in decreasing the occurrences of gun-related homicides and
incidents of gun-related injuries resulting from deliberate shootings, while minimizing
the instances of gun-involved suicides and occurrences of accidental injuries due to
firearms. In addition, the funding would allow the City to offer training on mental health,
substance use, and suicide intervention for internal staff as well as caregivers and
general community members.




The grant application is due on March 14, 2025. If approved, the Police Department
will move forward with submitting the application.

Contract Term
The term of the contract will be two years, beginning on July 1, 2025, with two one-
year extension options.

Financial Impact
No matching funds are required.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Request to Issue Revenue Contract Solicitations for Terminal 3 North 2
Concourse Concessions - District 8

Request the City Manager, or his designee, to authorize the Aviation Department to
issue Revenue Contract Solicitations (RCS) for food and beverage concessions, retail
concessions, and an airport lounge concession in the new North 2 Concourse in
Terminal 3 at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport.

Summary
The new Terminal 3 North 2 Concourse (T3N2) will be operational in 2027. With the
addition of the N2 concourse, the Aviation Department has developed a concession
leasing strategy to guide the procurement of contracts for food and beverage, retail,
and airport lounge concessions. This strategy is designed to ensure the airport offers
diverse, high-quality options that meet the needs of our passengers.

The strategic concession planning process included reviewing enplanement forecasts
and concourse construction schedules, determining the optimal concession square
footage, programming the concession spaces, identifying contracting opportunities,
and developing a timeline for the solicitations. This timeline also incorporates industry
discussions and outreach to small businesses to ensure broad participation.

The goals of this RCS are to foster healthy competition while increasing local and
small business participation, reflect current airport retail market trends, and optimize
sales and revenue. Additionally, the solicitations aim to elevate the quality and
uniqueness of souvenir, gifts, and retail merchandise offerings and showcase food and
beverage offerings that authentically reflect the local community's culinary heritage.
The solicitation opportunities will also include requirements for participation in the
Aviation Department's sustainability and airport concession marketing programs, and
requirements to support the Aviation Department's workplace initiatives and customer
experience programs.

Procurement Information
The Aviation Department intends to issue three separate solicitation packages that will
result in a total of six contract awards in accordance with the City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10 as follows:




Food and beverage concession package:
· One full-service restaurant with bar;
· Two quick-serve restaurants and cafe bar; and
· One coffee cafe designated for a small business operator

Retail concession package:
· One retail convenience, news, and gift store; and
· One specialty retail boutique-style store

Airport lounge concession package:
· One airport lounge

Packages will allow contracting opportunities for companies of all sizes, including
opportunity for subleasing, joint ventures, licensing agreements, and the inclusion of
small businesses. One package will provide the opportunity for small business
operators to compete and contract directly with the Aviation Department.

Responsive and responsible respondents will be evaluated according to the following
criteria:
· Proposed Concept(s) and Menu / Merchandising Plan
· Design and Quality of Tenant Improvements
· Management, Marketing, Operations, and Technology Plans
· Experience and Qualifications of Respondent and Partners (if any)
· Proposed Business Plan
· Financial Return to the City (Airport Lounge Concession Package only)

The highest-ranked respondent for each opportunity will be recommended for the
concessions lease awards. The Aviation Department intends to issue these
solicitations on or about July 2025, with an estimated contract award on or about July
2026. The City's Transparency Policy will be in effect with the release of the RCS and
throughout the process.

Public Outreach
This process will include all standard and required outreach efforts. The Aviation
Department will conduct targeted outreach efforts to attract interest.

Contract Term



The proposed aggregate primary contract term for the airport lounge and food and
beverage concepts will be between 12 to 15 years, and for the retail concepts will be
between 10 to 12 years, which will be negotiated based on the respondent's planned
capital investment.

Financial Impact
Rent for the food and beverage and retail concessions will be a percentage of gross
sales. The percentage will be finalized upon RCS publication and will range between 8
percent to 18 percent depending on the concession category. Rent for the airport
lounge concession will be a Minimum Annual Guarantee (MAG). The MAG will be
finalized upon RCS publication.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board Business Development Subcommittee
recommended approval of this item by a vote of 3-0 on January 2, 2025.

The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board recommended approval of this item by a vote of
7-0 on January 16, 2025.

The Transportation, Infrastructure, and Planning Subcommittee recommended
approval of this item by a vote of 4-0 on February 19, 2025.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport: 2485 E. Buckeye Road
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Solar-Powered Electric Vehicle Charging Systems Contract RFA 25-0557 -
Request for Award (Ordinance S-51692) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a five-year
contract with Beam Global (Beam) to provide transportable solar-powered electric
vehicle charging systems for the Aviation Department. Further request to authorize the
City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contract
will be up to $425,000.

Summary
This contract will provide four EV ARC™ solar-powered electric vehicle charging
systems for deployment across the Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX,
Airport) campus. These fully autonomous and transportable charging systems can be
strategically placed and relocated as needed, enabling PHX to support City-owned
electric vehicle operations. Portability is critical for meeting the electric vehicle fleet's
charging demands while accommodating multiple ongoing construction projects at the
Airport. These charging systems provide a construction-free solution to charge the
Aviation Department's electric vehicle fleet operation during ongoing construction
projects requiring the movement of personnel and equipment. Additionally, these
systems provide a clean, renewable energy sourcing aligning with the City of
Phoenix's greenhouse gas reduction and sustainability goals.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reason:
Special Circumstances Without Competition. Beam is the sole manufacturer of the
EV ARC™ solar powered systems that are transportable and do not require
disassembly to relocate.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about April 1, 2025, for a five-year aggregate term with no
options to extend.




Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value for this contract will be up to $425,000 for the five-year
aggregate term.

Funding is available in the Aviation Department's operating budget.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport
2485 E. Buckeye Road
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Security Access Controls RFA 25-FMD-008 - Amendment (Ordinance S-51689) -
Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 162215 with Everon, LLC, formerly known as ADT Commercial LLC, to
provide parts and services for the Phoenix Convention Center Department (PCCD)
and allow additional expenditures. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditure will not exceed
$5,000,000.

Summary
This contract provides parts and services for a Citywide security access control
upgrade project. This amendment is necessary to add PCCD as an authorized user
and to request additional payment authority to support a PCCD project, which will
include: upgrading all wiring between the access control panels and card readers
and/or keypads, replacing all existing access control and intrusion detection hardware
and software, adding approximately 150 card readers, and implementing interactive
remote access using the City’s existing network infrastructure.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on November 30, 2029.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $5,000,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $26,520,000. Funds are available in the Public Works and
Convention Center departments' budgets.

Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
Security Access Control Cooperative Agreements 162215 (Ordinance S-50893) on
May 29, 2024.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and John Chan and
the Public Works and Phoenix Convention Center departments.





Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Airport Custodial and Floor Care Services RFP 23-032 - Amendment (Ordinance
S-51700) - Districts 1, 7, 8 & Out of City

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 160028 with JanCo FS 3, LLC dba Velociti Services to provide custodial and
floor care services for the Phoenix Convention Center Department (PCCD). Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
additional expenditures will not exceed $250,000.

Summary
This contract will provide staff, equipment, supplies, and supervision necessary to
furnish custodial and floor care services to the Phoenix Convention Center, Orpheum
Theatre, Symphony Hall, and Herberger Theater. This amendment is necessary to add
PCCD as an authorized user and to request additional payment authority for PCCD.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on March 3, 2029.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $250,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contracts will not exceed $224,250,000. Funds are available in the Aviation and
Phoenix Convention Center departments' budgets.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Request to issue Request for Proposals (RFP) for Airport Custodial and Floor Care
Services on May 31, 2023; and

The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board Business and Development Subcommittee:
• Recommended approval of this item on November 2, 2023, by a vote of 3-0; and

The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board:
• Recommended approval of this item on November 16, 2023, by a vote of 6:0; and

The Transportation, Infrastructure and Planning Subcommittee:



• Recommended approval of this item on January 31, 2024, by a vote of 4-0; and

The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Airport Custodial and Floor Care Services Contract 160028 (Ordinance S-50535) on
February 7, 2024.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, 2485 E. Buckeye Road
Phoenix Deer Valley Airport, 702 W. Deer Valley Road
Goodyear Airport, 1658 S. Litchfield Road, Goodyear, AZ
Phoenix Convention Center Department, 100 N. Third Street
Council Districts: 1, 7, 8, and Out of City

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and John Chan, and
the Aviation and Phoenix Convention Center departments.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Emergency Medical Services and Fire Equipment Accessories and Parts IFB 25-
FSD-031 - Recommendation for Award (Ordinance S-51716) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate
contracts with Fire Truck Solutions, LLC; L.N. Curtis and Sons, Inc.; Matlick
Enterprises, Inc. dba United Fire Equipment Company; and Freightliner of Arizona,
LLC dba Velocity Truck Centers to provide emergency medical services (EMS)
vehicles and fire equipment accessories and parts for emergency fleet vehicles for the
Public Works Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse
all funds related to this item. The total value of the contracts will not exceed
$1,508,175.

Summary
The Public Works Department is responsible for acquisition and maintenance of a
variety of EMS vehicles and fire apparatus. Malfunctioning EMS and fire apparatus
parts require equipment to be placed out of service. These contracts will allow Public
Works Department to expedite vehicle repairs, maintain equipment availability for
emergency response, and ensure emergency medical services and parts are available
as needed to avoid disruption to operations.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix Administrative
Regulation 3.10.

Four vendors submitted bids deemed to be responsive to posted specifications and
responsible to provide the required goods and services. Following an evaluation based
on various discounts on multiple product lines, the procurement officer recommends
award to the following vendors:

Selected Bidders
Fire Truck Solutions, LLC
L.N. Curtis and Sons, Inc.
Matlick Enterprises, Inc. dba United Fire Equipment Company
Freightliner of Arizona, LLC dba Velocity Truck Centers




See Attachment A.

Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about April 1, 2025, for a three-year term with two one-
year options to extend.

Financial Impact
The value of the contracts will not exceed $1,508,175.

Funding is available in the Public Works Department's budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Public Works
Department.





ATTACHMENT A
IFB 25-FSD-031


Emergency Medical Services and Fire Equipment Accessories and Parts
Matlick Enterprises, Inc. Velocity Fire Equipment Sales,
Fire Truck L.N Curtis and
Item No. Manufacturer/Description dba United Fire LLC DBA Freightliner of
Solutions. LLC Sons -Corporation
Equipment Company Arizona LLC.
C
% DISC. % DISC. % DISC. % DISC.
1 Akron Brass 25% 30% 30% 27%
2 AMDOR 10% NO BID NO BID 8%
3 American LaFrance NO BID NO BID NO BID 0%
4 Bauer NO BID NO BID 5% NO BID
5 Class One 20% 2% 22% 8%
6 Elkhart 25% 23% 30% 25%
7 Fire Research Corp 10% 2% 8% 13%
8 Hale 10% 2% 22% 8%
9 Hypro NO BID NO BID 8% 5%
10 Iota Engineering NO BID NO BID NO BID 0%
11 Kussmaul Electronics 10% 10% 18% 8%
12 Tomar 10% 5% NO BID NO BID
13 ROM CORP. 10% 2% NO BID 0%







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Kitchen Hood Systems Maintenance and Repairs Contract IFB 25-FMD-033 -
Request for Award (Ordinance S-51690) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with A
P Fire Protection LLC to provide inspection, testing, maintenance, and repair of kitchen
hood fire suppression systems for multiple departments. Further request to authorize
the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the
contract will not exceed $2,500,000.

Summary
This contract will provide inspection, testing, maintenance, and repair of kitchen hood
suppression systems for multiple departments. The Public Works Department is
responsible for maintaining these systems for various departments, including the Fire,
Parks and Recreation, and Human Services departments.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix Administrative
Regulation 3.10. Four vendors submitted bids deemed to be responsive to posted
specifications and responsible to provide the required services. Following an
evaluation based on price, the procurement officer recommends award to the following
vendor:

Selected Bidder:
A P Fire Protection LLC: $6,390

Other Bidders:
RCI Systems, LLC: $6,995
Hiller Companies, LLC: $7,995
Fire Protection Service Corp dba Copperstate Fire Protection: $23,550

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about March 5, 2025, for a three-year term, with two one-
year options to extend.

Financial Impact



The aggregate contract value will not exceed $2,500,000. Funding is available in the
Public Works Department's operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Public Works
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Reciprocal Services Intergovernmental Agreement with the City of Glendale for
Disposal of Solid Waste (Ordinance S-51701) - Out of City

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a Reciprocal
Services Intergovernmental Agreement with the City of Glendale for Disposal of Solid
Waste to manage solid waste materials delivered for processing or disposal at City
facilities. This agreement will be conducted as a true balanced reciprocal agreement
on a ton-for-ton basis with no monetary exchange required. Further request to
authorize the City Treasurer to accept and for the City Controller to disburse funds
related to this item, in the event of an emergency that requires either party to exceed
the agreed upon amount of tonnage.

Summary
The City of Phoenix and the City of Glendale mutually agree it is beneficial and good
business for each party to use the transfer station owned by the other on a reciprocal
basis to support operations. This agreement allows business efficiency for managing
refuse collection and disposal with vehicle routing that reduces excessive travel time
and distances, reduces air pollution, and maximizes fuel economy.

Contract Term
The initial one-year contract shall begin on or about March 5, 2025, with four one-year
options to extend.

Financial Impact
This agreement will be conducted as a ton-for-ton exchange with no monetary value.
In the event of an emergency that requires either party to exceed the agreed upon
amount of tonnage, the exceeding party will compensate the receiving party by paying
the disposal associated gate rate or price per ton.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Public Works
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Avenida de las Mujeres del Movimiento Ceremonial Sign Topper - District 8

Request City Council approval to install a ceremonial sign topper honoring a group of
women who formed the farm worker movement in Arizona during the period of 1967-
1973. The ceremonial sign topper will be installed at the intersection of 10th Place and
Hadley Street.

Summary
In the 1960s, Santa Rita Hall served as the hub of the Chicano movement aimed at
addressing the social, political, and community disparities in advocating for the Latino
community. During the period of 1967-1973, a group of women from the community
helped form the farmer worker movement in Arizona. These women demonstrated
their support by participating in marches, rallies, and assisting with Cesar Chavez's
fast in 1972 at Santa Rita Hall. Attachment A identifies a group of women who helped
form the farm worker movement.

The ceremonial sign topper will be flag mounted on the existing signpost at the
intersection of 10th Place and Hadley Street. See Attachment B for an illustration of
the proposed sign topper.

Financial Impact
The fabrication and installation costs of the ceremonial sign topper will be funded by
Council District 7.

Location
10th Place and Hadley Street
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson and the Street
Transportation Department.





ATTACHMENT A
This list represents a group of women who helped form the farm worker movement in
Arizona during the period of 1967-1973. They demonstrated their support by way of
activism participating in marches, rallies and assisted with Cesar Chavez’s fast in 1972
at Santa Rita Hall in Phoenix, voter registration, and some were farm worker women
and members of the United Farm Workers.


Rita Aguilar* Rita López
Georgia Álvarez Rosie López
Celia Horton Arámbula Rita Ojeda*
Olga Aros Barbara Valencia
Marcelina Beltrán Adela Serrano
Socorro Bernasconi Jerri Trujillo Pastor
Catalina Broyles Maggie Rojas*
Anna Chávez Hilda Ortega Rosales
Maria Luisa Chávez* Belén Servín
Nancy Chávez* Christine Marín
Tilli Varela Corrales* María Martínez
Terry Cruz Francisca Montoya
Esther Díaz María Montoya*
Elisa Durán* Alicia Morado
Estella Leyba Espinoza Josie Ojeda*
Cecilia Esquer Mary Ojeda*
Petra Leija Falcón Rita Ojeda*
Rosie Galindo García Barbara Valencia
Yvonne Garrett Adela Serrano
Rita Gómez Jerri Trujillo Pastor
Raquel Gutiérrez Maggie Rojas*
Shole Guzmán* Hilda Ortega Rosales
Athia Hardt Belén Servín
Eulogia Heredia Honorable Nellie Soto
Carolina Hernández Guadalupe Sosa Valencia
Lori Hernández Nancy Washburn
Yolanda Collazos Kizer Hazel Washburn
Bessie López* Mary Rose Garrido Wilcox
Juana López
Honorable Nellie Soto
Guadalupe Sosa Valencia
Nancy Washburn
Hazel Washburn
Mary Rose Garrido Wilcox


* Farm Worker Women




ATTACHMENT B




Avenida de las Mujeres
del Movimiento







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Happy Valley Road: 67th Avenue to 35th Avenue Roadway Improvements -
Design-Bid-Build Services - ST85100437 (Ordinance S-51687) - District 1

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to accept Haydon Companies,
LLC as the lowest-priced, responsive and responsible bidder and to enter into an
agreement with Haydon Companies, LLC for Design-Bid-Build Services for the Happy
Valley Road: 67th to 35th avenues Roadway Improvements project. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The fee for
services will not exceed $37,475,767.77.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to upgrade Happy Valley Road to include three through
lanes and one buffered bike lane in each direction with raised median islands.

Haydon Companies, LLC 's services include, but are not limited to: roadway widening,
installation of Americans with Disability Act sidewalk and curb ramps, scenic trails,
raised medians, new bus bays, pads and stops, drainage improvements, new street
lighting, upgrading traffic signals, mill and overlay, new striping and signage, and
landscaping.

The selection was made using an Invitation for Bids procurement process set forth in
Section 34-201 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. Three bids were received on
November 19, 2024, and were sent to the Equal Opportunity Department for review to
determine subcontractor eligibility and contractor demonstrating responsiveness to
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program requirements.

The Opinion of Probable Cost and the three lowest responsive, responsible bidders
are listed below:

Opinion of Probable Cost: $28,238,854.37
Haydon Companies, LLC: $37,475,767.77
Combs Construction Company, Inc.: $37,482,442.20
Pulice Construction, Inc.: $41,782,699.30

Although the bid exceeds the Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Cost by more than 10



percent, it has been determined the bid represents a fair and reasonable price for the
required work scope. Additionally, the bid award amount is within the total budget for
this project.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is 660 calendar days from issuance of the Notice to
Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of
the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of
the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Haydon Companies, LLC will not exceed $37,475,767.77,
including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.

This project will utilize federal funds and is subject to the requirements of 49 Code of
Federal Regulations Part 26 and the U.S. Department of Transportation DBE program.
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and
approve funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.

Location
Happy Valley Road from 67th to 35th avenues
Council District: 1

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, the Street
Transportation Department and the City Engineer.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Specialized Equipment, Piping, and Infrastructure Coatings Construction
Administration and Inspection Services Cave Creek Water Reclamation Plant
and 23rd Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant - Amendment - WS90300011,
WS90400023, and WS90500299 (Ordinance S-51696) - Districts 2 & 7

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 146957 with RFI Consultants, L.L.C. to provide continuous construction
administration and inspection services for the Specialized Equipment, Piping, and
Infrastructure Coatings Construction Administration and Inspection Services Cave
Creek Water Reclamation Plant and 23rd Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant Project.
Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreement as necessary
within the Council-approved authority as provided below.

Summary
The purpose of this Project is to conduct an assessment and inspection services for
the application of protective coatings, piping, and manholes for collection systems, lift
stations, and the Cave Creek Water Reclamation Plant.

This amendment is necessary due to the remaining fund capacity on the contract, as
the project was put on hold due to COVID-19 restrictions. This amendment will provide
additional time to the agreement.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement amendment is three years from the issuance of the Notice
to Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end
of the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination
of the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to this Project.

Location
General Location: Cave Creek and Deer Valley roads and 22nd Avenue and W. Lower
Buckeye Road.
Districts: 2 and 7




Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
• Construction Administration and Inspection Services Agreement 146957
(Ordinance S-44261) on February 21, 2018; and
• Construction Administration and Inspection Services Agreement 146957
Amendment (Ordinance S-49661) on May 3, 2023.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
Ginger Spencer, the Water Services Department and the City Engineer.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Reinforced Concrete Pipe Main Inspection and Assessment Program -
Engineering Services Amendment - WS85508001 (Ordinance S-51697) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 151695 with Black & Veatch Corporation to provide additional engineering
services for the Reinforced Concrete Pipe Main Inspection and Assessment Program
Project. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreement as
necessary within the Council-approved authority as provided below.

Summary
The purpose of this Project is to continue with a multi-year inspection and assessment
program to inspect and assess the condition of approximately 228 miles of reinforced
concrete, cast iron, concrete cylinder ductile iron pipes, and other material types of
water transmission mains that vary in age throughout the conveyance system.

This amendment is necessary to understand condition, improve system resilience, and
identify leaks before major breaks occur. Extending the contract will allow for the
continuation of the program using already encumbered funds and hold the program in
place until there is a budget for a new inspection and assessment program. This
amendment will provide additional time to the agreement.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement amendment is two years from the issuance of the Notice to
Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of
the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of
the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
No additional funding is needed for this amendment.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
• Engineering Services Agreement 151695 (Ordinance S-46395) on March 4, 2020;
and
• Engineering Services Agreement 151695 Amendment (Ordinance S-49725) on May



31, 2023.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
Ginger Spencer, the Water Services Department and the City Engineer.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Specialized Equipment, Piping, and Infrastructure Coatings Construction
Administration and Inspection Services Cave Creek Water Reclamation Plant
and 23rd Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant - Amendment - WS90200056,
WS90200053, WS90300009, and WS90300011 (Ordinance S-51698) - Districts 2 &

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 146955 with Arcadis U.S., Inc. to provide continuous construction
administration and inspection services for the Specialized Equipment, Piping, and
Infrastructure Coatings Construction Administration and Inspection Cave Creek Water
Reclamation Plant and 23rd Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant Project. Further
request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreement as necessary within
the Council-approved authority as provided below.

Summary
The purpose of this Project is to conduct an assessment and inspection services for
the application of protective coatings, piping, and manholes for collection systems, lift
stations, and at the Cave Creek Water Reclamation Plant.

This amendment is necessary due to the remaining fund capacity on the contract as
the Project was put on hold due to COVID-19 restrictions. This amendment will provide
additional time to the agreement.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement amendment is three years from the issuance of the Notice
to Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end
of the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination
of the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to this project.

Location
General Location: Cave Creek and Deer Valley roads and 22nd Avenue and W. Lower
Buckeye Road.



Districts: 2 and 7

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
• Construction Administration and Inspection Agreement 146955 (Ordinance S-
44261) on February 21, 2018; and
• Construction Administration and Inspection Agreement 146955 Amendment
(Ordinance S-49660) on May 3, 2023.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
Ginger Spencer, the Water Services Department and the City Engineer.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Portland Cement Concrete Repair - 2-Step Job Order Contracting Services -
JOC232 (Ordinance S-51704) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate master
agreements with the four contractors listed in Attachment A, to provide portland
cement concrete repair job order contracting (JOC) services Citywide for the Street
Transportation Department. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to
the agreements as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as
provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
The total fee for all services will not exceed $65 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunications, cable
television, railroads, and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize
inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City
Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real
property.

Summary
The contractors' JOC services will be used on an as-needed basis to provide portland
cement concrete repair services, including but not limited to: setting up and taking
down traffic control devices in accordance with the City of Phoenix Traffic Barricade
Manual; excavating, preparing subgrade, setting concrete forms to match existing
grade and drainage elevations, and pouring and finishing concrete valley gutters with
and without aprons, curb and gutter, alley and driveway entrances, and sidewalk to
match existing elevations and drainage; forming to fit field conditions, and pouring and
finishing American Disabilities Act compliant concrete sidewalk ramps, including the
installation of detectable warnings; replacing asphalt concrete pavement to match
existing asphalt pavement and new concrete; adjusting utility junction boxes and
manhole and hand hole covers; and performing other services as may be required in



accordance with the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG), Phoenix
Supplement to MAG, and/or field designated to retrofit existing conditions within the
dedicated public right-of-way on major arterial, collector, local, and industrial streets
within Phoenix's city limits. Additionally, the JOC contractors will be responsible for
fulfilling requirements of the Small Business Enterprise Program.

Procurement Information
The selections were made using a two-step qualifications and price-based selection
process set forth in Section 34-604 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In
accordance with A.R.S. Section 34-604(H), the City may not publicly release
information on proposals received or the scoring results until an agreement is
awarded. Eleven firms submitted proposals and are listed in Attachment A.

Contract Term
The term of each master agreement is for up to five years, or until an aggregate
expenditure of up to $16,250,000, whichever occurs first. Work scope identified and
incorporated into the master agreement prior to the end of the term may be agreed to
by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the master agreement. No
additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The master agreement value for each of the JOC contractors will not exceed
$16,250,000, including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs. The total fee for all
services will not exceed $65 million.

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute job order
agreements performed under these master agreements for up to $3 million each. In no
event will any job order agreement exceed this limit without Council approval to
increase the limit.

Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department’s Capital Improvement
Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will review and approve
funding availability prior to issuance of any job order agreement. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.

Public Outreach
The public will be notified on each project, if notification is required.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, the Street


Transportation Department and the City Engineer.





Attachment A



Selected Firms
Rank 1: Michael J Valente Contracting, Inc.
Rank 2: TALIS Construction Corporation
Rank 3: Temcon Concrete Construction, LLC
Rank 4: ViaSun Corporation

Additional Proposers
Rank 5: S&S Paving & Construction, Inc.
Rank 6: Nesbitt Contracting Co., Inc.
Rank 7: Sunland Asphalt and Construction, LLC
Rank 8: Degan Construction, LLC
Rank 9: Lincoln Constructors, Inc.
Rank 10: NORC Concrete, LLC

Proposers who were deemed non-responsive are listed below,
in alphabetical order
Rank 11: Gonzalez Asphalt, Inc.







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Aquifer Storage and Recovery Wells 303 and 301 - Construction Manager at Risk
Construction Services Amendment - WS85010051 (Ordinance S-51686) - District

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 144845 with MGC Contractors, Inc. to provide additional Construction
Manager at Risk Construction Services for the Aquifer Storage and Recovery Wells
303 and 301 Project. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the
agreement as necessary within the Council approved expenditure authority as
provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
The additional fee for services included in this amendment will not exceed
$8,557,839.98.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to augment Phoenix's potable water resources during
times of long-term water shortages and emergency outages and to meet potable
system demand balancing.

This amendment is necessary to meet agency requirements because of increased
scope of work, as well as to add funds for construction. This amendment will provide
additional time and money to the agreement.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement amendment is two years from the issuance of the Notice to
Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of
the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of
the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
· The initial agreement for Construction Manager at Risk Construction Services was
approved for an amount not to exceed $24,720, including all subcontractor and
reimbursable costs.
· Amendment 1 increased the agreement by an additional $6,342,000, for a new total
amount not to exceed $6,366,720.
· This amendment will increase the agreement by an additional $8,557,839.98, for a


new total amount not to exceed $14,944,559.98, including all subcontractor and
reimbursable costs.

Funding for this amendment is available in the Water Services Department's Capital
Improvement Program. The Budget and Research Department will separately review
and approve funding availability prior to the execution of any amendments. Payments
may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may
extend past the agreement termination.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Design Services Agreement 144844 (Ordinance S-43430) on April 19, 2017;
· Design Services Agreement 144850 (Ordinance S-43436) on April 19, 2017;
· Construction Manager at Risk Construction Phase Services Agreement 144845
(Ordinance S-43431) on April 19, 2017;
· Construction Manager at Risk Design Phase Services Agreement 144946
(Ordinance S-43507) on May 10, 2017;
· Construction Manager at Risk Design Phase Services Agreement 145054
(Ordinance S-43532) on May 31, 2017;
· Construction Manager at Risk Construction Phase Services Agreement 145055
(Ordinance S-43535) on May 31, 2017;
· Construction Administration and Inspection Services Agreement 147305 (Ordinance
S-44464) on April 19, 2018; and
· Construction Manager at Risk Construction Phase Services Agreement 144845
Amendment (Ordinance S-44667) on June 6, 2018.

Location
4902 E. Asher Hills Drive
Council District: 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
Ginger Spencer, the Water Services Department and the City Engineer.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
HVAC Maintenance and Repair Services - Amendment (Ordinance S-51688) -
Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Agreement 152364 with HACI Service, LLC to provide HVAC
maintenance and repair services for the Water Services Department. Further request
to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional
expenditures will not exceed $1,500,000.

Summary
The purpose of this amendment is to request additional funds for providing
preventative maintenance services, repairs, and replacement parts on all heating,
ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) units and replacement units on an as-needed
basis for the Water Services Department.

Based on asset replacement schedules and condition assessments, HVAC units and
cabinets at treatment plants and related facilities are due for replacement.
Furthermore, additional funds are needed for the ongoing preventative maintenance
and repairs. This amendment is necessary to ensure continued preventative
maintenance, repair, and replacement of HVAC equipment.

Contract Term
The agreement term remains unchanged, ending June 30, 2025.

Financial Impact
This amendment will increase the authorization for the agreement by an additional
$1,500,000, for a new total not-to-exceed agreement value of $11,573,000.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department's operating budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· HVAC Maintenance and Repair Services for Water Services Department - Contracts
152361, 152375, 152362, 152363, and 152364 (Ordinance S-50978) on June 12,
2024, for an additional $750,000.


· HVAC Maintenance and Repair Services for Water Services Department - Contracts
152375, 152362, and 152364 (Ordinance S-50730) on April 3, 2024, for an
additional $1,823,000.
· HVAC Maintenance and Repair Services for Parks and Recreation Department -
Contracts 152361, 152375, 152362, 152363, and 152364 (Ordinance S-46664) on
June 3, 2020.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Water
Services Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Water Pipe and Miscellaneous Fittings - IFB 2021-WDD-436 - Amendment
(Ordinance S-51706) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
consent the assignment of Water Pipe and Miscellaneous Fittings Contract 154214
with Dana Kepner Company, LLC to Core & Main LP.

Summary
The purpose of this amendment is to consent to assignment of the agreement with
Dana Kepner Company, LLC to Core & Main LP (which has completed its acquisition
of Dana Kepner Company, LLC). This amendment would allow for Water Services to
continue to purchase the products to complete repairs and new installations of critical
infrastructure.

The contract provides water pipe and miscellaneous fittings equipped with valves and
pack joints, ball style and full port, for various locations throughout the Water Services
Department. Contractor is responsible for providing fittings that are manufactured in
compliance with the Environmental Protection Agency, Arizona Department of
Environmental Quality, Maricopa County, and local requirements impacting the
treatment and delivery of potable drinking water.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on April 30, 2026.

Financial Impact
There is no requested change to the existing spending authorization for this contract
as part of this amendment.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
contract to Dana Kepner Company, LLC, Water Pipe and Miscellaneous Fittings
Contract 154214 (Ordinance S-47514) on May 5, 2021.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Water



Services Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Utility Optimization Roadmap Contract RTO 2425-WAD-671 - Request for Award
(Ordinance S-51711) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Arcadis U.S., Inc. to provide a Utility Optimization Roadmap for the Water Services
Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $995,455.

Summary
This contract will provide the Water Services Department with consulting services to
assist with creating a Utility Optimization Roadmap to move the organization forward
with data collection, data management, and data optimization for business processes
and prioritizing water-owned systems to efficiently and effectively manage the future
state of the utility.

Procurement Information
A Request for Qualifications procurement was processed in accordance with City of
Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Four vendors submitted proposals. Three vendors were deemed to be responsive to
the posted specifications and responsible to provide the required services. An
evaluation committee of City staff evaluated those offers based on the following criteria
with a maximum possible point total of 1000:

Method of Approach (0-480 points)
Experience (0-315 points)
Cost (0-205 points)

After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following vendor:

Arcadis U.S., Inc., 816.50 points

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about March 1, 2025, for a five-year term with no options



to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $995,455.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department's operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Water
Services Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Support for Formation of Palatial Gardens Irrigation Water Delivery District
(Resolution 22277) - District 6

Request to adopt a resolution to support formation of the Palatial Gardens Irrigation
Water Delivery District (IWDD) through Maricopa County. The proposed IWDD
includes the single-family residential properties generally bounded by Glendale
Avenue to the south, 625 feet north of Glendale Avenue to the north, 12th Street to the
west, and 16th Street to the east. This action has no financial impact to the City of
Phoenix.

Summary
Under the provisions of Arizona Revised Statutes chapter 20, title 48, Irrigation Water
Delivery Districts, when the majority of the lot or parcel owners who are entitled to or
capable of receiving irrigation water from the same system want irrigation water
delivered to their lands, they may propose organization of an IWDD. Maricopa County
requires that applicants for an IWDD within the City's boundaries obtain the City
Council's support before the County will start the process of forming or re-establishing
an IWDD.

If approved by the City Council, landowning neighbors seeking an IWDD then
complete a special taxation impact statement and submit this document to the
Maricopa County Board of Supervisors. The Board of Supervisors, along with Salt
River Project (SRP), will decide if a petition to organize an IWDD may be circulated.
See Attachment A for the consent from SRP to the Board of Supervisors and a map
of the SRP delivery system.

This request has been reviewed by the Street Transportation and Water Services
departments.

Financial Impact
This action has no financial impact to the City of Phoenix.

Public Outreach
On December 12, 2024, the City received a formal written request from one of its
residents to pursue the City Council's approval to form an IWDD with Maricopa County



(Attachment B).

Location
The proposed IWDD includes the single-family residential properties generally
bounded by Glendale Avenue to the south, 625 feet north of Glendale Avenue to the
north, 12th Street to the west, and 16th to the east.
Council District: 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
Ginger Spencer, and the Street Transportation and Water Services departments.





Attachment A - Consent from SRP Board of Supv and Map of SRP Delivery System
EXHIBIT "C"


BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF MARICOPA COUNTY


In the Matter of the Application and CONSENT OF SALT RIVER PROJECT
Petition for the Formation of an Irrigation ) AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT
Water Delivery District to be known as: ) AND POWER DISTRICT AND SALT
Palatial Gardens migation Water RIVER VALLEY WATER USERS'
De!ivery District of Maricopa County ) ASSOCIATION, COLLECTIVELY

REFERRED TO AS SRP.



TO: THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF MARICOPA COUNTY,
ST ATE OF ARIZONA

Erica Trapp, being first duly sworn upon her oath, deposes and says:

That she is the Director of Water Delivery Services of the SRP.

That the lands to be included within the Palatial Gardens migation Water Delivery
District are within the Salt River Project Agricultura! Improvement and Power District and
the Salt River Valley Water Users' Association.


That the Board of Directors of the Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and
Power District and the Board of Governors of the Salt River Valley Water Users'
Association consent to the formation of said migation Water Delivery District and said
action was duly authorized by resolutions dated March 5, 2001.


That she has read this Consent and knows the content thereof and that the matters
and things contained herein are true and correct to the best of her own knowledge,
information, and belief.




SUBSCRIBEDAND
SWORNTO beforemethis Z("':ay/"'or'eAvw!M
VL
MY commission expires: har,! Z


STEPHANIE
JO-ANNBERRY

!i9J ::::I,,
Explrea Maroh 2, 2026



Palatial Gardens IWDD
E Myrtle Ave
E Myrtle Ave E Myrtle Ave



160-27-001A
2B
ve N1 -07
E Palmaire Ave E Palmaire A N1 0 -26
160-28-081A N 12th Pl 5th 16 Csr
N 13th St N 13th Pl 4 St 5th i z ona
160-27-018A
N1 A r
th Pl
St 164-26-298


E Glenn Dr E Glenn Dr 2
-11
160-27-005 160-27-014 0-26
160-28-085H
160-27-004 160-26-097 E Aurelius Ave
N 12th St
160-27-033A -09
160-26-129A 4-26




160-27-034F N 16TH ST
160-26-129B




E GLENDALE AVE



161-03-158

161-02-141D
Legend
161-02-142A

E Flynn Ln Palatial Gardens IWDD
N 12th St N 12th Wy N 13th St N 13th Pl N 14th St N 14th Pl N 15th St N 15th Pl 164-34-028K
Streets E Lamar Rd
Tax Parcels
E Lamar Rd N 12th Pl




0 200 400 800 1,200 1,600
157 / Feet Date: 12/8/2024
Attachment B - Request Letter and Map Submitted by Palatial Gardens
To:CityofPhoenix
CC:SaltRiverProject
December12,2024

From:CindySpencer
RE:RequestforFormationofIrrigationWaterDeliveryDistrict


DearCityofPhoenix,


WeasaneighborhoodPalatialGardens,arerequestingconsenttoformanIrrigationWater
DeliveryDistrict(IWDD)fromtheCityofPhoenix.ThepurposeofanIWDDistocreatean
equitabledistributionofcostsassociatedwiththeuseandmaintenanceoftheprivate
neighborhoodirrigationsystem.ThisisaccomplishedusinganannualMaricopaCounty
propertyassessment.WeareaskingtheCityofPhoenixtopassthisrequestofresolution,
authorizingtheformationofPalatialGardensIWDD.

EnclosedyouwillfindSaltRiverProject’sapprovalalongwithmapsoftheproposeddistrict,
legaldescription,andthehomeownerlist.Iwillbetherepresentativefortheproposed
IWDD.OncewereceiveapprovalfromtheCityofPhoenix,anImpactStatementtoform
willbesenttotheMaricopaCountyBoardofSupervisorstomovetheprocessforward.We
appreciateyourattentiontothisrequest.Forquestionspleasecontactmeatthenumber
below.

Sincerely,

CindySpencer
7026N.13thPlace
Phoenix,AZ85020Ͳ5407
clspencer7026@gmail.com
602Ͳ430Ͳ7372






EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lots 1 through 18, of PATIO DEL SOL, a Subdivision of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of
Section 4, Township 2 North, Range 3 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian according to the
Plat of Record in the Office of the County Recorder of Maricopa County, Arizona, Recorded in Book 46 of
Maps, Page 48;

TOGETHER WITH

Lots 19 through 36, of PATIO DEL SOL UNIT ONE, a Subdivision of the Southeast Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter of Section 4, Township 2 North, Range 3 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and
Meridian according to the Plat of Record in the Office of the County Recorder of Maricopa County,
Arizona, Recorded in Book 47 of Maps, Page 45;

TOGETHER WITH

Lots 37 through 54, of PATIO DEL SOL UNIT TWO, a Subdivision of the Southeast Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter of Section 4, Township 2 North, Range 3 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and
Meridian according to the Plat of Record in the Office of the County Recorder of Maricopa County,
Arizona, Recorded in Book 48 of Maps, Page 32;

TOGETHER WITH

Lot 22, of NORTHWOOD ESTATES, a Subdivision of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of
Section 4, Township 2 North, Range 3 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian according to the
Plat of Record in the Office of the County Recorder of Maricopa County, Arizona, Recorded in Book 111
of Maps, Page 1;

TOGETHER WITH

That part of Lot 1, SQUAW PEAK PROMENADE, a Subdivision of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast
Quarter of Section 4, Township 2 North, Range 3 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian
according to the Plat of Record in the Office of the County Recorder of Maricopa County, Arizona,
Recorded in Book 361 of Maps, Page 27; more particularly described as follows:

COMMENCING at the Southeast corner of said Section 4;

Thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 07 seconds West along the South line of said Section 4, a distance
of 333.53 feet to a point;




Thence North 00 degrees 49 minutes 48 seconds West a distance of 50.01 feet to a point on the North
right of way line of Glendale Avenue also being the Southwest corner of Patio Del Sol Unit 3 Subdivision
as recorded in Book 48, Page 33 and amended in Book 53, Page 14;

Thence continuing along the West line of said Patio Del Sol Subdivision North 00 degrees 49 minutes 58
seconds West, a distance of 345.67 feet to the True Point of Beginning;

Thence continuing North 00 degrees 49 minutes 58 seconds West along the West line of said Patio Del
Sol Subdivision a distance of 262.28 feet

Thence South 89 degrees 58 minutes 59 seconds East along the North line of said Patio Del Sol
Subdivision, a distance of 238.99 feet;

Thence South 27 degrees 06 minutes 38 seconds East, a distance of 130.68 feet;

Thence South 00 degrees 28 minutes 51 seconds East, a distance of 66.07 feet;

Thence South 89 degrees 10 minutes 02 seconds West, a distance of 177.41 feet;

Thence South 00 degrees 49 minutes 58 seconds East, a distance of 8.50 feet;

Thence South 89 degrees 10 minutes 02 seconds West, a distance of 16.50 feet;

Thence South 00 degrees 49 minutes 58 seconds East, a distance of 67.00 feet;

Thence South 89 degrees 10 minutes 02 seconds West, a distance of 102.50 feet to the True Point of
Beginning.

TOGETHER WITH

Lots 23 through 34, of PALATIAL GARDENS TWO, a Subdivision of the Southwest Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter of Section 4, Township 2 North, Range 3 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and
Meridian according to the Plat of Record in the Office of the County Recorder of Maricopa County,
Arizona, Recorded in Book 69 of Maps, Page 35;

TOGETHER WITH

Tract 1 and the West 118 Feet of Tract 2, of SQUAW PEAK TRACT, a Subdivision of the Southeast Quarter
of Section 4, Township 2 North, Range 3 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian according to
the Plat of Record in the Office of the County Recorder of Maricopa County, Arizona, Recorded in Book
17 of Maps, Page 22;

EXCEPT the South 100 Feet of the North 341.50 Feet of the West 153 Feet of said Tract 1 of SQUAW
PEAK TRACT.

TOGETHER WITH




Lots 35 through 46, of PALATIAL GARDENS THREE, a Subdivision of the Southwest Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter of Section 4, Township 2 North, Range 3 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and
Meridian according to the Plat of Record in the Office of the County Recorder of Maricopa County,
Arizona, Recorded in Book 75 of Maps, Page 33;

TOGETHER WITH

Lots 6 and 7, of VICKI LYNN MANOR, a Subdivision of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of
Section 4, Township 2 North, Range 3 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian according to the
Plat of Record in the Office of the County Recorder of Maricopa County, Arizona, Recorded in Book 112
of Maps, Page 41.




3DODWLDO*DUGHQV,:''
( 0\UWOH $YH
( 0\UWOH $YH ( 0\UWOH $YH



ϭϲϬͲϮϳͲϬϬϭ
Ϯ
YH 1 ͲϬϳ
( 3DOPDLUH $YH ( 3DOPDLUH $ 1 Ϭ ͲϮϲ U
ϭϲϬͲϮϴͲϬϴϭ 1WK3O WK ϭϲ &V
 WK
1WK6W 1WK3O
6W UL] RQD
1 $
ϭϲϬͲϮϳͲϬϭϴ
3O
WK
6W
ϭϲϰͲϮϲͲϮϵϴ


( *OHQQ 'U (*OHQQ'U Ϯ
Ͳϭϭ
ϭϲϬͲϮϳͲϬϬϱ ϭϲϬͲϮϳͲϬϭϰ ϬͲϮϲ
ϭϲϬͲϮϴͲϬϴϱ,
ϭϲ
ϭϲϬͲϮϳͲϬϬϰ ($XUHOLXV$YH
ϭϲϬͲϮϲͲϬϵϳ

1WK6W
ϴ
ϭϲϬͲϮϳͲϬϯϯ ͲϬϵ
ϭϲϬͲϮϲͲϭϮϵ ͲϮϲ
ϰ
ϭϲ




ϭϲϬͲϮϳͲϬϯϰ& 17+67
ϭϲϬͲϮϲͲϭϮϵ




( */(1'$/( $9(



ϭϲϭͲϬϯͲϭϱϴ

ϭϲϭͲϬϮͲϭϰϭ
>ĞŐĞŶĚ
ϭϲϭͲϬϮͲϭϰϮ

()O\QQ/Q WĂůĂƟĂů'ĂƌĚĞŶƐ/t
1WK6W 1WK:\ 1WK6W 1WK3O 1WK6W 1WK3O 1 WK 6W 1WK3O ϭϲϰͲϯϰͲϬϮϴ<

ŝƚLJŽĨWŚŽĞŶŝdž
^ƚƌĞĞƚƐ (/DPDU5G
dĂdžWĂƌĐĞůƐ
(/DPDU5G 1WK3O




     
 )HHW 'DWH
Palatial Gardens Ownership Report
12/8/2024




Average
Parcel Number Tax Year Owner Name In Care Of Mailing Address City State Zip Country Situs Address Situs City Zip Exempt Status Exempt Type Net Assessed Value LPV Total Acreage
Count Lot Size
1 160-26-006 2025 USA 20,789 0.218
PETROSYAN ARTUR/NAZARYAN AZNIV
2 160-26-053A 2025 ARMAN FAMILY TRUST USA 24,923 0.404
TR
3 160-26-002 2025 BARBER CHAD/ALESHA USA 22,501 0.219
4 160-27-025 2025 BATEMAN DANIEL USA 32,284 0.314
5 160-26-040 2025 BELL FAMILY TRUST BELL SHAUN/ERIKA TR USA 28,033 0.222
6 160-26-045 2025 BERNARD CLINTON H/MELANIE J USA 20,225 0.252
7 160-26-032 2025 BLACKBURN REGINA C/NOAH J USA 21,974 0.216
8 160-27-023 2025 BODWIN VALLES LIVING TRUST BODWIN CHERYL A/VALLES CHRIS A TR USA 35,746 0.274
9 160-27-049 2025 CAMPBELL JEFFREY JON/TAMMY SUZANNE USA 25,700 0.308
10 160-26-013 2025 CANTWELL NATHEN WEBSTER USA 24,324 0.218
11 160-26-049 2025 CBB TRUST BOGERT BRETT E/CAROL L TR USA 25,022 0.219
11 160-26-050 2025 CBB TRUST BOGERT BRETT E/CAROL L TR USA 2,747 0.215
12 160-26-001A 2025 CORBETT-PORTON DEBRA USA 14,788 0.213
13 160-26-003 2025 CORSMEIER SCOTT/CLARIE USA 33,096 0.223
14 160-26-016 2025 COX MEGHAN E USA 29,103 0.225
15 160-26-039 2025 CRAWLEY JAMES/BICHLER JESSICA USA 27,090 0.223
16 160-27-022 2025 DEGEUS MICHAEL P/BRIANNA M USA 45,314 0.266
WILLIAMS DIRK RUSSELL/JENNIFER
17 160-27-030 2025 DRW & JCW FAMILY TRUST USA 38,850 0.271
CELLA TR
18 160-27-044 2025 EAKERNS FAMILY TRUST EAKERNS RAY/JEANETTE USA 34,712 0.322
19 160-26-047 2025 EGARDEN LLC USA 22,106 0.256
20 160-27-031 2025 ELLIS JEROME/MARGARET USA 22,483 0.318
21 160-26-008 2025 FISHER DONALD C/HANNAH O USA 29,228 0.260
22 160-26-052 2025 FLYNN MARGARET M USA 21,542 0.224
23 160-26-037A 2025 FUNG JUNE USA 16,970 0.193
24 160-26-014 2025 GALLGER BONNIE TR USA 13,050 0.215
25 160-26-007 2025 GRAZIER DAVID/KRISTEN USA 27,675 0.212
26 160-26-018A 2025 GUZMAN JESUS USA 25,718 0.217
27 160-26-024 2025 HALDIMAN DAVID A/KELSEY W USA 21,316 0.218
28 160-27-038 2025 HANSEN SARAH/CAZARES ALLEN USA 30,019 0.310
29 160-27-043 2025 HAYNES PATRICIA J USA 34,015 0.323
HERNANDEZ NICOLE CATHERINE/RICHARD
30 160-27-039 2025 USA 30,911 0.270
JR
31 160-26-030 2025 JACKA DANIEL/KAITLYN USA 19,943 0.202
32 160-26-009 2025 KNIGHTS BRADFORD/VICKI USA 33,045 0.262
33 160-27-026 2025 KNOBBE MARK F/MARY E USA 35,238 0.323
34 160-26-029 2025 LARUE KARI USA 23,047 0.258
35 160-27-041 2025 LAURA S SCOTT LIVING TRUST USA 39,884 0.275
36 160-27-024 2025 LEMON KARI/DARIN USA 29,669 0.293
37 160-27-047 2025 LPAL LLC USA 35,174 0.266
38 160-26-028 2025 LUCAS KATHRYN C HICKEY/ROBERT CORY USA 49,243 0.259
MACKEY CHRISTIAN EDWIN/SOPHIA
39 160-27-021 2025 MACKEY FAMILY TRUST USA 27,562 0.267
MAGDALENA TR
40 160-27-040 2025 MCWENIE MATTHEW W/KERRI L USA 29,029 0.272
41 160-27-028 2025 MIKE & CINDY SPENCER TRUST USA 22,972 0.276
42 160-26-015 2025 MUELLER JAMES/MCNEAL HANNAH USA 19,811 0.223
43 160-26-012 2025 NARDINE BRENT ALLEN USA 15,917 0.214
44 160-26-041 2025 NELSON CALEY K USA 34,854 0.213
45 160-26-025 2025 NELSON MICHAEL S/STEPHANIE L USA 16,669 0.213
46 160-26-021 2025 NORMAN WOODMANSEE JR LIVING TRUST USA 22,958 0.221
47 160-26-038 2025 OSTERBAUER MARK J USA 25,963 0.217
OUR SAVIOURS EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN 501c3 Religious
E 160-27-034F 2025 USA E 117,381 4.324
CH Organization
48 160-27-083A 2025 PATRICK RICK J USA 44,965 0.344
PATRICK-ROLANDO LEBRIAN A/ROLANDO
49 160-26-048 2025 USA 22,213 0.217
ADAM V
PERRONE JONATHAN EDWARD/VERONICA
50 160-26-034 2025 USA 23,009 0.214
BROWN
51 160-26-010 2025 POONAWALA AAMIR KHOZEM USA 21,673 0.259
52 160-26-011 2025 POONAWALA ZAHIR/MARIE USA 21,937 0.254
53 160-27-082 2025 PRICE CHARLES STEVEN/RONA JO USA 43,855 0.320
54 160-26-023 2025 PTAK KATHRYN RAE/PATRICK USA 27,769 0.212
55 160-26-097 2025 REED VIKKI TERESA TR USA 48,830 0.437
RICHARDSON LISA J/EKSTROM
56 160-27-032 2025 USA 28,395 0.295
CHRISTOPHER A
57 160-26-043 2025 RIDINGS INVESTMENTS LLC USA 22,501 0.214
58 160-27-046 2025 RODNEY AND LINDA TESCH TRUST USA 35,182 0.269
59 160-26-035 2025 SABZON ESTHER/SOFIEV JOSEPH USA 45,650 0.209
SCHAFNIT DAVID RICHARD/ANABEL
60 160-27-027 2025 USA 30,140 0.299
WALTON
61 160-26-031 2025 SCHUM CORY USA 16,029 0.213
62 160-26-046 2025 SHIHA SAMIR USA 20,225 0.247
63 160-27-020 2025 SIRI DARTAR S KHALSA TRUST USA 19,303 0.310
64 160-26-027 2025 SKINNER KATHRYN C USA 19,303 0.257




1 of 2
Palatial Gardens Ownership Report
12/8/2024




Average
Parcel Number Tax Year Owner Name In Care Of Mailing Address City State Zip Country Situs Address Situs City Zip Exempt Status Exempt Type Net Assessed Value LPV Total Acreage
Count Lot Size

65 160-26-051 2025 SMOOCHES AND OXES FAMILY TRUST ANSEL THOMAS O/CARLY J TR USA 26,152 0.214
66 160-26-019A 2025 SOLCITO INVESTMENTS LLC USA 20,451 0.212
67 160-26-017 2025 SPANG PETER A TR USA 34,757 0.219
68 160-26-129A 2025 SQUAW PEAK PROMENADE II LLC IRWIN G PASTERNACK & ASSOCIATES USA 431,914 1.361
69 160-26-044 2025 SULLIVAN GWYNNE/ALBER SHAY USA 26,521 0.263
TEEL DENNIS MUREL/RHONDA
70 160-27-048 2025 TEEL FAMILY TRUST USA 27,769 0.266
ANNETTE TR
71 160-26-026 2025 THOMAS NATHAN/LEANNE R USA 25,323 0.256
THURBER DEREK WOOD/REYNOLDS EMILY
72 160-26-020 2025 USA 22,520 0.215
MELISSA
73 160-26-042 2025 TRUSH THOMAS/MICHELLE USA 20,131 0.221
74 160-27-045 2025 VAN HOFWEGEN THOMAS/RACHEL USA 39,984 0.285
75 160-26-004 2025 WATKO FAMILY TRUST WATKO GERHARD A/LINDA S TR USA 30,572 0.221
76 160-26-036A 2025 WEISSE ANGELA USA 19,604 0.203
77 160-27-029 2025 WILLIAMS IRVINE DECKER IV USA 31,569 0.274
78 160-27-042 2025 WINTONLI LISA USA 33,827 0.299
79 160-26-033 2025 YAGUDAEV ROBERT/EPSHTEYN IRINA USA 17,873 0.211
80 160-26-022 2025 YAGUDAEV RONY USA 33,070 0.220
81 160-26-005 2025 YAGUDAYEV DANIEL USA 24,364 0.215
501c3 Religious
E 160-27-033A 2025 YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL OF ARIZONA INC USA E 0 1.054
Organization

2,757,993 27.195 0.324




2 of 2



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Request for Reconsideration of Item 79 from the February 19, 2025 Formal
Council Meeting - Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning
Application PHO-2-24-Z-58-19-7 - Northeast Corner of 6th Avenue and Broadway
Road (Ordinance G-7362) - District 7

Request for reconsideration of Item 79 - Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption -
Rezoning Application PHO-2-24-Z-58-19-7 - Northeast Corner of 6th Avenue and
Broadway Road (Ordinance G-7362) to be placed on the agenda for the Formal City
Council meeting on March 5, 2025.

Summary
At the February 19, 2025 Formal City Council meeting, Item 79 - Amend City Code -
Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application PHO-2-24-Z-58-19-7 - Northeast Corner of
6th Avenue and Broadway Road (Ordinance G-7362) was continued to the April 9,
2025 Formal City Council meeting by a vote of 9-0.

Pursuant to the Rules of Council Proceedings Rule 7(n), this reconsideration is being
placed on the March 5, 2025 agenda in accordance with a memo requesting
reconsideration from Councilman Galindo-Elvira (Attachment A) filed with the City
Clerk on February 26, 2025.

If this request is approved, the City Council will reconsider this item. If this request is
not approved, the City Council will not reconsider this item and the original action on
the item will stand.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Reconsideration of Item 79 from the February 19, 2025 Formal Council Meeting -
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application PHO-2-24--Z-58-
19-7 - Northeast Corner of 6th Avenue and Broadway Road (Ordinance G-7362) -
District 7

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to approve the Planning
Hearing Officer's recommendation without further hearing by the City Council on
matters heard by the Planning Hearing Officer on January 15, 2025.

Summary
Application: PHO-2-24--Z-58-19-7
Existing Zoning: PUD RSIO
Acreage: 10.9

Owner: Chicanos Por La Causa Broadway and Central LIHTC LLC
Applicant/Representative: Prince Twumasi, Chicanos Por La Causa Inc.

Proposal:
1. Request to delete Stipulation 6 regarding undergrounding and relocation of existing
irrigation facilities.

VPC Action: The South Mountain Village Planning Committee heard this request on
January 14, 2025, and recommended denial as filed and approval with a modification
by a vote of 11-3.
PHO Action: The Planning Hearing Officer took the case under advisement. On
January 23, 2025, the Planning Hearing Officer took the case out from under
advisement and recommended denial as filed with a modification.

Location
Northeast corner of 6th Avenue and Broadway Road
Council District: 7
Parcel Address: 356 W. Broadway Road

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and



Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STIPULATIONS APPLICABLE TO
REZONING APPLICATION Z-58-19-7 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY
ORDINANCE G-6716.

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning stipulations applicable located approximately

Northeast corner of 6th Avenue and Broadway Road in a portion of Section 20,

Township 1 North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Attachment “A”,

are hereby modified to read as set forth below.

STIPULATIONS:

STIPULATIONS:

1. An updated Development Narrative for the Broadway and Central PUD
reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development within 14 days of City Council approval of this
request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the
Development Narrative date stamped April 24, 2020 as modified by the
following stipulations.

a. Page 1:

1) Add “Hearing Draft: April 24, 2020”

2) Add “City Council adopted: [Insert Adoption date]”

b. Page 7:


1) Replace text with the following: Where buildings are adjacent to a
pedestrian accessway, a frontage type shall be required. If frontage
does not contain an entrance, units adjacent to a pedestrian
accessway shall be designed with windows and/or balconies
overlooking the accessway.

c. Pages 6 and 7:

1) Add the following text in Section 1304 General Site Development
Standards: The western most paseo may deviate from the 3rd
Avenue alignment up to 175 feet if the deviation is marked by
pedestrian oriented wayfinding; the southern most connection to
Broadway Road shall be constructed after the SRP facility is buried
an easements issues resolved, no later than the development of the
townhomes depicted on Exhibit E.

d. Page 8:

1) Replace text in Section 1309 Landscape Standards, 6th Avenue
and Pueblo Avenue frontage, with the following: Shall be planted
with large canopy, single trunk, shade trees placed a minimum of
20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings installed between the
sidewalk and buildings. The trees allowed in the planting area may
be adjusted or removed based on input form SRP or the Water
Services Department.

2) Replace text in Section 1309 Landscape Standards, Broadway
Road, with the following: The sidewalk and tree diagram contained
in Exhibit C of this PUD shall apply. Planting details are provided in
Section 1312 character areas of this table. The trees allowed in the
planting area may be adjusted based on input from SRP or the
Water Services Department; however, the requirement for trees
shall not be removed.

e. Replace Exhibit E with the Site Plan date stamped May 21, 2020.

2 The developer shall provide a total of 32 feet of paving with curb, gutter, a
minimum five-foot wide sidewalk and streetlighting along Pueblo Avenue and
facilitate the pavement along the “out parcel” (APN 113-05-045). If the
developer is unable to procure the “out parcel” for the local street pavement
requirement, the development shall not have access along the entirety of
Pueblo Avenue except for one combined access point for emergency and
refuse collection only at the easter limit of the property, as determined by
Planning and Development and Street Transportation Department.

3. The developer shall dedicate 25 feet of right-of-way for the south half of
Pueblo Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.




4. The developer shall dedicate a 14-foot Sidewalk Easement along Broadway
Road, for the entire length of the development, to accommodate a detached
sidewalk and shade trees adjacent to the sidewalk, as approved by the
Planning and Development and Street Departments.

5. The developer shall dedicate 5 feet of right-of-way for the east half of 6th
Avenue, as approved by the Street Transportation Department.

6. Existing irrigation facilities along 6th Avenue and Broadway Road are to be
undergrounded and relocated outside of City right-of-way. Contact SRP to
identify existing land rights and establish the appropriate process to relocate
facilities. Relocations that require additional dedications or land transfer
require completion prior to obtaining a certificate of occupancy for PHASE 2
OF the development.

7. The developer shall provide enhanced internal pedestrian circulation with a
primary access point at the intersection of 6th Avenue and Broadway Road.
The access point shall be enhanced with a minimum of 700 square foot
landscaped area planted with drought-tolerant plant materials providing
seasonal interest and 75 percent live cover and bollard light path or lighted are
element visible from the perimeter of the site. The above shall be approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

8. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

9. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study/Statement to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study
is reviewed and approved by the City. Contact Mr. Matthew Wilson, Traffic
Engineer III, (602) 262-7580, to set up a meeting to discuss the requirements
of the statement/study. Upon completion of the TIS the developer shall submit
the completed TIS to the Planning and Development Department counter with
instruction to forward the study to the Street Transportation Department,
Design Section.

10. The developer shall record a Notice to Prospective Purchasers of Proximity to
Airport in order to disclose the existence and operational characteristics of
Phoenix Sky Harbor Internation Airport (PHX) to future owners of tenants of
the property.

11. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for
the Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

12. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a


Proposition 207 Waiver of Claims form. The Waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder’s Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.



SECTION 2. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district granted pursuant to Ordinance G-6716 this portion of the rezoning is now

subject to the stipulations approved pursuant to Ordinance G-6716 and as modified in

Section 1 of this Ordinance. Any violation of the stipulation is a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Building permits shall not be issued for the subject site

until all the stipulations have been met.

SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the

validity of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 19th day of February

2025.




________________________________
MAYOR



ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney




By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A - Legal Description (1 Page)
B - Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PHO-2-24—Z-58-19-7


The Land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Maricopa, State of
Arizona, and is described as follows:

EAST PARCEL
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 1
NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20;
THENCE SOUTH 89°55’23” WEST (BASIS OF BEARINGS) ALONG THE SOUTH
LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 1127.63 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 00°21’14” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-
OF-WAY LINE OF BROADWAY ROAD, SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00°21’14” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 112.04 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89°39’26” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 440.83 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 00°21’14” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 298.80 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF
PUEBLO AVENUE, ACCORDING TO BOOK 31 OF MAPS, PAGE 3, MARICOPA
COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE NORTH 89°39’26” EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTH
LINE, A DISTANCE OF 575.83 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°21’14” EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 411.47 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
BROADWAY ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 89°55’23” WEST, ALONG SAID NORTH
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 135.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING. CONTAINING 187,225 SQ.FT. OR 4.2981 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.

WEST PARCEL
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 1
NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20;
THENCE SOUTH 89°55’23” WEST (BASIS OF BEARINGS) ALONG THE SOUTH
LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 1127.63 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 00°21’14” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-
OF-WAY LINE OF BROADWAY ROAD, SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89°55’23” WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE, A DISTANCE OF 964.39 FEET; THENCE NORTH 47°34’27” WEST, A
DISTANCE OF 7.37 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 6TH AVENUE;
THENCE NORTH 05°04’17” WEST, ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 402.73 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF PUEBLO AVENUE,
ACCORDING TO BOOK 31 OF MAPS, PAGE 3, MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDS;
THENCE NORTH 89°39’26” EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF
379.48 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°21’14” EAST, A DISTANCE OF 298.80 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°39’26” EAST, A DISTANCE OF 623.43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
00°21’14” EAST, A DISTANCE OF 112.04 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 216,602 SQ.FT. OR 4.9725 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Enter into a Development Agreement Related to the Construction and Operation
of Water and Sewer Facilities Necessary to Serve the Verdin Development
(Ordinance S-51721) - District 2

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to negotiate and enter into a
three-party development agreement between the City of Phoenix (City) and Taylor
Morrison/Arizona, Inc., and MacEwen Ranch, LLC (collectively, Developer), outlining
the parties' obligations related to repayment, impact fee credit, reimbursement, and
other financial considerations associated with the construction and operation of water
and sewer facilities required to serve the Verdin Development. Further request
authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and for the City Controller to disburse,
funds related to this item.

Summary
Pursuant to approved water and sewer master plans, the Developer is required to
construct water and sewer facilities necessary to serve the Verdin Development.
Several of the required facilities may be subject to Water or Sewer Repayment
Agreements (Repayment), Water or Wastewater Development Impact Fee Credit
Agreements (Credit), or reimbursement from the Verdin Community Facilities District
(Reimbursement). The three-party development agreement will outline the terms and
conditions by which the Developer may qualify for Repayment, Credit, or
Reimbursement. Additionally, the Developer will be required to construct a public lift
station and dual-force main. This agreement will establish the terms by which the
Developer shall cover temporary revenue shortfalls related to the operation and
maintenance of the lift station and dual-force main.

The following major deal points have been accepted by the Developer.

1. WASTEWATER LIFT STATION SHORTFALL
(a) The City conducted an in-depth financial analysis to calculate the estimated
operational shortfall created by the timing of the Verdin lift station completion and
planned buildout of the community (Shortfall Study).

(b) The agreement will specify the Verdin Developer's obligation to fund the City's
operational and maintenance shortfall costs for the Verdin lift station upon the



completion of construction and final acceptance of the lift station by the City. The
shortfall obligation will be paid by the Developer in amounts covering a period of 10
years as estimated in the Shortfall Study, subject to payment terms to be defined in the
agreement.

2. WASTEWATER CAPACITY
(a) The agreement will acknowledge that wastewater planned capacity allocation for
Verdin will be estimated in accordance with City of Phoenix Water Services
Department Engineering Policy P-103, dated November 19, 2004, as may be
amended by the City, subject to Phoenix City Code requirements.

3. REPAYMENT AGREEMENTS
(a) The agreement will specify the share of capital costs associated with oversizing
sewer facilities to be constructed by the Developer (meaning those facilities providing
excess capacity over that required to serve Verdin) that are not reimbursed from the
Verdin Community Facilities District (Verdin CFD) but would, notwithstanding Section
28-23 Parts D and E of the Phoenix City Code, otherwise qualify for the Sewer
Repayment Program as provided in Phoenix City Code Chapter 28, including terms as
set forth in Section 28-23 Part G. Repayment Program eligible capital costs will be
calculated as a percentage of the Title 34 compliant Guaranteed Maximum Price
(GMP) of the sewer facilities, using the acreage of the benefited parcels outside of the
Verdin CFD divided by the total benefited acreage (Verdin CFD and the benefited
parcels outside of the Verdin CFD).

(b) The agreement will identify the water facilities that qualify for impact fee credit as
provided in Phoenix City Code Chapter 29 and specify the requirement to enter into
separate water Impact Fee Credit Agreements as applicable.

(c) The agreement will include a "Reimbursement Matrix" exhibit created by the City
and Developer to serve as a guideline regarding the Repayment Program and Impact
Fee Credit Agreements.

Financial Impact
There is no negative financial impact to the City.

Location
Council District: 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Water
Services Department.




Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Approval of Historic Preservation Exterior Rehabilitation Grants (Ordinance S-
51691) - Districts 4 & 7

Request for approval of 24 Historic Preservation Exterior Rehabilitation Grants for
Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25 totaling $385,320.89. In exchange for receiving grant funds,
the property owners agree to sell to the City a 15- or 20-year conservation easement
to protect the historic character of the property's exterior. Further request authorization
for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Summary
Applications for the Exterior Rehabilitation Grant Program for FY 2024-25 were due on
November 15, 2024. A total of 35 property owners submitted applications; one of these
was disqualified because the request was less than the $5,000 minimum grant
amount. The remaining 34 applications were forwarded to the Exterior Rehabilitation
Grant panel for evaluation. The panel consisted of three staff members, a member of
the Historic Preservation Commission, and a neighborhood representative/past grant
recipient.

The panel met on December 13, 2024, to review the applications. Scoring criteria
included assessment of whether the application: followed historic preservation
standards; addressed the physical needs of the property; reflected a logical sequence
or logical planning of an overall rehabilitation project; resulted in a positive visual
impact on the historic appearance of the property and streetscape; addressed a critical
maintenance issue; and returned a vacant building to productive use. Additional points
were awarded for projects that were individually listed or located in a priority historic
district (Brentwood, East Evergreen, Garfield, Idylwilde Park, North Garfield, Oakland,
Phoenix Homesteads, Roosevelt Park, Villa Verde and Woodland), as well as for the
significance and integrity of the property, the adequacy of the proposed bids and
budget, and the overall quality of the application.

The panel recommended the 24 grant applications listed below for a total of
$385,320.89. Panel members agreed that the next highest application, which received
a score of 33.1, as well as those that scored lower, should not be funded. Applicants
who are not recommended for funding will be encouraged to meet with staff to improve
their application and resubmit it during a future round.




· 5 ANGEL TRUST (James C. Aten and Luz Marina Aten); 1134 W. Culver Street; FQ
Story - install new wood shingle roof. Score: 44.4. Amount: $20,000.
· Robert Clement Fleury; 508 W. Portland Street; Roosevelt - install new wood
shingle roof. Score: 42.5. Amount: $20,000.
· Bushu-Dang Family Trust; 502 W. Vermont Avenue; Medlock Place - repair steel
windows and picture window. Score: 41.8. Amount: $20,000.
· Jennifer L. Wadsworth Trust; 2014 N. Laurel Avenue; Fairview Place - install new
asphalt shingle roofs, reinstall terracotta ridge caps. Score: 41.5. Amount:
$16,236.50.
· Japril Trust (Tess Calvert and Christian Peterson); 712 W. Palm Lane; Encanto-
Palmcroft - install new wood shingle roof. Score: 41.3. Amount: $20,000.
· Brown Family Trust (Blanca Brown); 1715 N. 17th Avenue; Fairview Place - replace
windows, masonry repairs, exterior stucco, exterior paint. Score: 41.2. Amount:
$20,000.
· Jennifer R. Delgado; 232 E. Oregon Avenue; Windsor Square - repair steel
windows. Score: 40.9. Amount: $20,000.
· Richard A. and Cindi L. Schuster; 918 W. Willetta Street; FQ Story - repair wood
windows. Score: 39.1. Amount: $17,125.
· David A. and Alisha R. Solheim; 215 E. Oregon Avenue; Windsor Square - repair
steel windows. Score: 39.0. Amount: $20,000.
· Pavella-Rieger Family Trust (Janice Pavella and Sharon Rieger); 78 W. Culver
Street; Roosevelt - install new asphalt shingle roof, remove existing porch on top of
carport, replace roof support. Score: 38.7. Amount: $13,540.84.
· Hart Diffley Trust; 1842 N. Laurel Avenue; Fairview Place - repair steel windows.
Score: 38.6. Amount: $20,000.
· William R. and Ann M. Skanadore; 318 W. Roma Avenue; Yaple Park - masonry
repair, foundation repair, exterior paint. Score: 38.5. Amount: $9,596.53.
· Paul M. and Karen A. Nakata; 530 W. Coronado Road; Willo - foundation repair,
replace flooring. Score: 38.5. Amount: $16,311.39.
· Travis D. Bradley and Jessica L. Suworoff; 918 W. Heatherbrae Drive; Woodlea -
repair steel windows, foundation repair, masonry repair, exterior paint, exterior door
repair or replacement. Score: 38.3. Amount: $12,566.64.
· Will and Asuka James; 602 W. Turney Avenue; Yaple Park - repair steel windows.
Score: 37.9. Amount: $20,000.
· Jeffrey D. Critchley; 2037 N. 12th Street; Coronado - repair steel windows. Score:
37.7. Amount: $14,664.
· Stacey M. Newman Living Trust; 1622 W. Wilshire Drive; Del Norte Place -
foundation and masonry repair. Score: 37.2. Amount: $6,834.34.



· Miguel Montes III and Kelly Kissman; 3024 N. 16th Drive; North Encanto - porch
slab and post repair, repair steel windows. Score: 36.7. Amount: $5,750.
· Mandy Lee Cornelius; 48 W. Lewis Avenue; Willo - repair or replace exterior siding,
repair framing as needed. Score: 36.7. Amount: $13,795.65.
· Ian White and Samuel Wilkes; 1114 W. Heatherbrae Drive; Woodlea - restore wood
shingle roof, replace exterior siding, repair steel windows. Score: 36.2. Amount:
$20,000.
· Tiffany Ly and Cayley McDowell; 1611 N. 11th Avenue; Encanto-Palmcroft - install
new dimensional asphalt shingle roof. Score: 36.1. Amount: $8,750.
· Jeff and Gail Willmore; 10 E. Orange Avenue; Windsor Square - repair steel
windows. Score: 35.8. Amount: $20,000.
· Seabosxi Trust (Jeff and Betty Brewitt); 3034 N. 17th Avenue; North Encanto -
foundation and masonry repair. Score: 34.9. Amount: $20,000.
· Andrew W. Fiese; 342 W. Cambridge Avenue; Willo - replace ceiling joists, replace
wall studs, repair steel windows. Score: 34.4. Amount: $10,150.

In exchange for the grant funds, the property owners agree to sell to the City a
conservation easement to protect the historic character of the properties' exteriors. The
term of the easement will be 15 years for grant amounts of $10,000 or less and 20
years for grant amounts between $10,001 and $20,000. The conservation easement
will be recorded on the property's title and will run with the land.

Financial Impact
The 24 grant awards total $385,320.89. Funds in the amount of $200,000 are available
in the General Fund Historic Preservation operating budget and $185,320.89 from the
2023 General Obligation Bond Program - Historic Preservation.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Historic Preservation Commission recommended approval of this item on January
13, 2025, by a 9-0 vote.
The Transportation, Infrastructure and Planning Subcommittee recommended approval
of this item on February 19, 2025, by a 4-0 vote.

Location
Twenty-two of the residential property addresses above are located in District 4 and
two are in District 7.
Council Districts: 4 and 7

Responsible Department
The item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and



Development Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Abandonment of Right-of-Way - ABND 240023 - Located between 7833 South
36th Street and parcel immediately west of APN: 301-23-003C (Resolution 22278)
- District 8

Abandonment: 240023
Project: 23-1343
Applicant: Porchlight Homes
Request: To abandon a twenty-five foot right of way (ROW) that totals to 3,211 square
feet.
Date of Hearing: June 13, 2024

Location
Generally located between 7833 South 36th Street and parcel immediately west of
APN: 301-23-003C
Council District: 8

Financial Impact
A fee was also collected as part of this abandonment in the amount of $771.10.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Abandonment of Easement - ABND 240040 - 3444 North 27th Avenue (Resolution
22281) - District 4

Abandonment: 240040
Project: 04-2042
Applicant: Jeffrey L. Williams
Request: To abandon an existing irregular shaped drainage easement. The drainage
easement was recorded within the Final Plat for Milo Generations AZ1 (Recording No.
20110302825, 4/8/2011, Book 1082, Page 11).
Date of Decision: October 24, 2024

Location
Generally located at 3444 North 27th Avenue
Council District: 4

Financial Impact
Pursuant to Phoenix City Code ch. 31, art. V, sec. 31-64(e), the City acknowledges the
public benefit received by the generation of additional revenue from the private tax
rolls and by the elimination of third-party general liability claims against the City,
maintenance expenses, and undesirable traffic patterns, and also the replatting of the
area with alternate roadways and new development, to be sufficient and appropriate
consideration in this matter.

None. No fee was required as a part of this easement abandonment, although filing
fees were paid.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1279 (Ordinance G-
7365) - District 2

Request to authorize the City Manager to amend Section 601 of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1279. This
amendment reflects that the property owner has met all of the rezoning conditions
previously approved by City Council with a portion of Z-117-05-2 and the
entitlements are fully vested.

Summary
To rezone a site located approximately 875 feet east and 284 feet south of the
southeast corner of the North Valley Parkway alignment and Carefree Highway.
Application No.: Z-117-05-2
Zoning: FH PCD NBCOD
Owner: Arizona State Land Department
Acreage: 23.03

Location
Located approximately 875 feet east and 284 feet south of the southeast corner of
the North Valley Parkway alignment and Carefree Highway
Address: N/A
Council District: 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning
and Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADOPTING OFFICIAL
SUPPLEMENTARY ZONING MAP 1279.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as

follows:

SECTION 1. That Section 601 of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance is

hereby amended by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1279, which

accompanies and is annexed to this ordinance and declared a part hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 19th day of February,

2025.



________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


____________________________City Clerk



APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney




By:_________________________

_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




DI:arm:LF25-0118:02-19-2025







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1281 (Ordinance G-
7366) - District 1

Request to authorize the City Manager to amend Section 601 of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1281. This
amendment reflects that the property owner has met all of the rezoning conditions
previously approved by City Council with Z-65-06-1 and the entitlements are fully
vested.

Summary
To rezone a parcel located approximately 1,100 feet north of the northeast corner of
31st Avenue and Sweetwater Avenue.
Application No.: Z-65-06-1
Zoning: R-4
Owner: Thunderbird Developers Holding Company, LLC
Acreage: 9.51

Location
Located approximately 1,100 feet north of the northeast corner of 31st Avenue and
Sweetwater Avenue
Address: 13404 N. 30th Avenue
Council District: 1

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning
and Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADOPTING OFFICIAL
SUPPLEMENTARY ZONING MAP 1281.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as

follows:

SECTION 1. That Section 601 of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance is

hereby amended by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1281, which

accompanies and is annexed to this ordinance and declared a part hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 5th day of March,

2025.



________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


____________________________City Clerk



APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney




By: _________________________

_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




DI: arm: LF25-0219:03-05-2025







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application PHO-1-24--Z-60-
23-2 - Approximately 375 Feet East of the Southeast Corner of 25th Place and
Rose Garden Lane (Ordinance G-7364) - District 2

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to approve the Planning
Commission's recommendation without further hearing by the City Council on matters
heard by the Planning Hearing Officer on December 18, 2024, and the Planning
Commission on February 6, 2025.

Summary
Application: PHO-1-24--Z-60-23-2
Existing Zoning: A-1
Acreage: 5.02

Applicant: Creation RE, LLC
Owner: JJX3, LLC
Representative: Stephen Anderson, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Appellant: Stephen Anderson, Gammage & Burnham, PLC

Proposal:
1. Request to modify Stipulation 4 regarding a minimum landscape strip.
2. Request to delete Stipulation 11 regarding minimum green infrastructure techniques.
3. Request to delete Stipulation 14 regarding overhead utilities in the public right-of-
way.

VPC Action: The Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee (VPC) was scheduled to
hear this request on December 2, 2024, but did not have a quorum. The VPC heard
this request on January 6, 2025, and recommended approval to Stipulation 4, by a
vote of 13-0; and approval to Stipulation 14, by a vote of 12-1. Stipulation 11 was
withdrawn by the applicant.
PHO Action: The Planning Hearing Officer recommended denial as filed, approval with
modifications, and an additional stipulation.
PC Action: The Planning Commission recommended denial as filed, approval with
modifications, and an additional stipulation, per the Planning Hearing Officer
recommendation, with a deleted stipulation, by a vote of 9-0.




Location
Approximately 375 feet east of the southeast corner of 25th Place and Rose Garden
Lane
Council District: 2
Parcel Address: 2601 and 2615 E. Rose Garden Lane

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STIPULATIONS APPLICABLE TO
REZONING APPLICATION Z-60-23-2 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY
ORDINANCE G-7223.

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning stipulations applicable located approximately

375 feet east of the southeast corner of 25th Place and Rose Garden Lane in a

portion of the northwest quarter of Section 23, Township 4 North, Range 3 East, as

described more specifically in Attachment “A”, are hereby modified to read as set

forth below.

STIPULATIONS:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date
stamped September 8, 2023, as modified by the following stipulations, and as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

2. The development shall be in general conformance with the elevations date
stamped November 15, 2023, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

3. The landscape setback along the north side of the property, adjacent to Rose
Garden Lane, shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, large canopy,
drought-tolerant, shade trees, planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent
groupings, and drought-tolerant shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers
to achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.


4. A minimum 5-foot-wide landscape strip shall be provided DIRECTLY
ADJACENT TO along the north, west, and south sides of the building, and
shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, large canopy, drought-tolerant,
shade trees, planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, and drought-
tolerant shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers to achieve a minimum
of 75% live coverage, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

5. A MINIMUM 5-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE SETBACK SHALL BE PROVIDED
ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE PLANTED WITH MINIMUM 2-INCH
CALIPER, LARGE CANOPY, DROUGHT-TOLERANT, SHADE TREES,
PLANTED 20 FEET ON CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT GROUPINGS, AND
SHRUBS, ACCENTS, AND VEGETATIVE GROUNDCOVERS EVENLY
DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE LANDSCAPE AREA TO ACHIEVE A
MINIMUM OF 50% LIVE COVERAGE, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND AS SHOWN ON THE
LANDCAPE PLAN DATE STAMPED DECEMBER 18, 2024.

6. All uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with minimum 2-
5. inch caliper, large canopy, drought-tolerant, shade trees. Landscaping shall be
dispersed throughout the parking area and achieve 25% shade, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

7. All pedestrian pathways, including sidewalks, shall be shaded by the structure,
6. landscaping, or a combination of the two to provide a minimum of 75% shade,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
7. constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces,
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

9. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided per the requirements of Section
8. 1207.H of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance through Inverted U and/or artistic
racks located near the office and installed per the requirements of Section
1307.H of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Artistic racks shall adhere to the
Bicycle Master Plan.

10. A minimum of 10% of the required bicycle parking spaces shall include
9. standard electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

11. A minimum of 5% of the required parking spaces shall include Electric Vehicle
10. (EV) Installed Infrastructure, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

12. A minimum of two green infrastructure (GI) techniques for stormwater


11. management shall be implemented per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green
Infrastructure and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater
Management, as approved or modified by the Planning and Development
Department.

13. One outdoor employee resting area of no less than 400 square feet, or two
12. 200-square foot areas shall be provided on site. Each required pedestrian area
shall include a minimum of two pedestrian seating benches, constructed of
quality and durable materials, and shaded to a minimum of 75% using
minimum 2-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant shade trees and/or
architectural shade, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

14. A minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum 8-foot-
13. wide landscape strip located between the back of curb and sidewalk shall be
constructed on the south side of Rose Garden Lane, adjacent to the
development, planted to the following standards and as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, drought-tolerant,
shade trees, planed 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings.

b. Drought-tolerant shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers with a
maximum mature height of two feet to achieve a minimum of 75% live
coverage.

15. All existing overhead utilities, within the public right-of-way shall be
14. undergrounded, adjacent to the development. The developer shall coordinate
with all affected utility companies for their review and permitting.

15. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
16. paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

16. In the even archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
17. developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for
the Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

17. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
18. Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder’s Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.




SECTION 2. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district granted pursuant to Ordinance G-7223 this portion of the rezoning is now

subject to the stipulations approved pursuant to Ordinance G-7223 and as modified in

Section 1 of this Ordinance. Any violation of the stipulation is a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Building permits shall not be issued for the subject site

until all the stipulations have been met.

SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the

validity of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 5th day of March,

2025.




________________________________
MAYOR



ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A - Legal Description (1 Page)
B - Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
MARICOPA COUNTY ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 213-11-014

A parcel of land situated in a portion of the Northwest quarter of Section 23, Township
4 North, Range 3 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County,
Arizona. Said parcel also being a portion of that certain property as described in
Document 1999-0040550 and more particularly described as follows:

Lot 14 MOHAWK PARK, according to Book 58 of Maps, Page 48, records of Maricopa
County, Arizona.







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing and Resolution Adoption - General Plan Amendment GPA-CC-2-
24-7 - 7th Avenue Between Washington Street and Jefferson Street (Resolution
22279) - District 7

Request to hold a public hearing on a General Plan Amendment for the following item
to consider adopting the Planning Commission's recommendation and the related
resolution if approved. Request to amend the ReinventPHX Transit Oriented
Development Strategic Policy Framework (and the PlanPHX 2025 General Plan) to
update the 7th Avenue / Washington Street / Jefferson Street station area Place Type
classification from Medium Urban Center to Downtown Core. This item is a companion
case to Z-TA-6-24-7 and must be heard first, followed by Z-TA-6-24-7.

Summary
Application: GPA-CC-2-24-7
Current Designation: Medium Urban Center Place Type
Proposed Designation: Downtown Core
Proposal: General Plan Amendment to update the Place Type in the ReinventPHX
Transit Oriented Development Strategic Policy Framework (and the PlanPHX 2025
General Plan) for the 7th Avenue / Washington Street / Jefferson Street station area
from Medium Urban Center to Downtown Core

Owner: City of Phoenix
Applicant: City of Phoenix, Planning Commission
Representative: Jeff Stapleton, Community and Economic Development Department

Staff Recommendation: Approval, as shown in the recommended text in Exhibit A of
the Staff Report.
VPC Information Only: The Central City Village Planning Committee heard this item on
December 9, 2024, for information only.
VPC Action: The Central City Village Planning Committee heard this item on January
13, 2025, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 10-
1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on February 6, 2025, and
recommended approval, per the Central City Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 9-0.




Location
7th Avenue between Washington Street and Jefferson Street
Council District: 7
Parcel Address: N/A

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION



RESOLUTION


A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2025
GENERAL PLAN FOR PHOENIX, APPLICATION GPA-CC-2-24-7,
CHANGING THE PLACETYPE CLASSIFICATION FOR THE
STATION DESCRIBED HEREIN.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The 2025 Phoenix General Plan, which was adopted by

Resolution 22191, is hereby amended by adopting GPA-CC-2-24-7. The 7th Avenue /

Washington Street / Jefferson Street station area is designated as the Downtown Core

Place Type in the ReinventPHX Transit Oriented Development Strategic Policy

Framework (and the PlanPHX 2025 General Plan).

SECTON 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the ReinventPHX Transit Oriented Development Strategic Policy Framework

(and the PlanPHX 2025 General Plan) to reflect this Place Type classification change

as shown below:




Amend the TOD Typology Map on page 14 of the ReinventPHX Transit Oriented
Development Strategic Policy Framework by removing the old map and inserting the
new map as follows:




***




Amend page 18 of the ReinventPHX Transit Oriented Development Strategic Policy
Framework by removing the old page and inserting the new page as follows:




***




PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 5th day of March 2025.



MAYOR




ATTEST:


____________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk




APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney



By:___________________________
___________________________



REVIEWED BY:


______________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




ATTACHMENT B




GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS
November 27, 2024

Application: GPA-CC-2-24-7
Applicant: City of Phoenix Planning Commission
Location: 7th Avenue between Washington Street and
Jefferson Street
Proposal: General Plan Amendment to update the Place Type
in the ReinventPHX Transit Oriented Development
Strategic Policy Framework (and the PlanPHX 2025
General Plan) for the 7th Avenue / Washington and
7th Avenue / Jefferson station location from Medium
Urban Center to Downtown Core
Staff Recommendation: Approval, as shown in the recommended text in
Exhibit A


BACKGROUND
In 2013, the Phoenix City Council adopted the Transit Oriented Development Strategic
Policy Framework (Framework) via GPA-1-09. The Framework added additional policy
guidance to the Phoenix General Plan regarding growth and redevelopment within the
city’s light rail corridors. The City Council approved an update to the Framework in 2016
via GPA-CE-CC-SM-1-15-6-7-8, which incorporated the South Central light rail
extension and the new 50th Street light rail station. In 2018, the City Council approved
GPA-3-17 to update additional station area designations based on analysis of multiple
factors, including transportation connections and employment.
One of the prominent policy elements of the Framework is the establishment of Center
Place Types for each of the light rail station areas (0.25-mile radius from the station).
Place Types are planning typologies that describe an area and help avoid a “one-size-
fits-all” approach for future growth and redevelopment. A Center is a term used to
describe a concentration of activities within a location. The Framework’s Centers
provide policy guidance for the scale (building height) and intensity (density and mix of
uses) of development within the light rail station areas. The Framework contains eight
Center Place Types, each with its own unique recommendations for scale and intensity
of development or redevelopment. The table below summarizes the Framework’s
Center Place Types.




Staff Analysis
GPA-CC-2-24-7
Page 2


Center Scale Intensity

Downtown Core 6+ Stories Highest Intensity

Regional Center 5-10 stories (Incentive 20 stories) High Intensity

Major Urban Center 4-8 stories (Incentive 15 stories) Medium to High Intensity

Medium Urban Center 3-6 stories (Incentive 10 stories) Medium Intensity

Minor Urban Center 2-5 stories (Incentive 7 stories) Medium to Low Intensity

Suburban Commuter 2-4 stories (Incentive 7 stories) Medium to Low Intensity
Center

Neighborhood Center 2-4 stories (Incentive 5 stories) Low Intensity

Historic Neighborhood 2-4 stories (Incentive 5 stories) Low Intensity
Center

The Planning and Development Department partnered with the Village Planning
Committees to assign one of the eight Center Place Types to each of the light rail
station areas. This initial collaboration with the Village Planning Committees combined
staff’s analysis of each station area’s land use pattern, zoning, employment, housing
and transit density with the Village Planning Committee members’ perspectives
regarding the type of scale and intensity that would be appropriate for the station area.
In November 2024, Phoenix voters approved the PlanPHX 2025 General Plan, which
incorporated the Transit Oriented Communities Place Types on page 80 of the plan.
This request is to revise the designation of the Center Place Type for the 7th Avenue /
Washington Street / Jefferson Street station area from Medium Urban Center to
Downtown Core. This request is a companion case to Z-TA-6-24-7, a text amendment
to the Downtown Code to increase the maximum height and density allowed for an area
bounded by Adams Street to the north, 7th Avenue to east, Jefferson Street to the
south, and 8th Avenue to the west.
ANALYSIS
The planned light rail stations at 7th Avenue / Washington Street and 7th Avenue /
Jefferson Street are located within the Business Core Character Area of the
Downtown Code. The Business Core is intended to function as a strong regional
center for employment, entertainment, conventions, tourism, and cultural institutions,
drawing visitors from around the country and attracting residents from throughout the
region. The greatest development intensity within the region should be located within
this Character Area. New development should be innovative and incorporate small
public spaces that promote pedestrian movement and comfort. The Business Core


Staff Analysis
GPA-CC-2-24-7
Page 3


should have vibrant pedestrian activity
and be served frequently by multiple
modes of high quality public transit.
Designating the station area at 7th
Avenue / Washington Street / Jefferson
Street as Downtown Core will better
reflect the fact that the location is within
the core of downtown and will enhance
the ability of the surrounding area to meet
the goals of the Business Core Character
Area of the Downtown Code.

Since the previous designation of a
station area Place Type at this location,
additional planning work has been done
for the Capitol Extension project with
specific station locations identified. The
map below indicates the most up-to-date
Downtown Code Character Areas Map,
route and station location proposal.
Source: City of Phoenix




Capitol Extension Route Map, Source: Valley Metro

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the General Plan Amendment as shown in Exhibit A. The
updated Center Place Type will serve as a policy guide for future land use decisions
and investments within the station area.

Writer
Anthony Grande
November 27, 2024

Staff Analysis
GPA-CC-2-24-7
Page 4

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
A: ReinventPHX Transit Oriented Development Strategic Policy Framework revisions




EXHIBIT A
Application No. GPA-CC-2-24-7: General Plan Amendment to update the Place Type
in the ReinventPHX Transit Oriented Development Strategic Policy Framework (and the
PlanPHX 2025 General Plan) for the 7th Avenue / Washington and 7th Avenue /
Jefferson station location from Medium Urban Center to Downtown Core
Staff Proposed Language That May Be Modified During the Public Hearing Process is
as follows:
Amend the TOD Typology Map on page 14 of the ReinventPHX Transit Oriented
Development Strategic Policy Framework by removing the old map and inserting
the new map as follows:




Amend page 18 of the ReinventPHX Transit Oriented Development Strategic
Policy Framework by removing the old page and inserting the new page as
follows:




ATTACHMENT C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-CC-2-24-7

Date of VPC Meeting January 13, 2025
Request From Medium Urban Center Place Type
Request To Downtown Core Place Type
Proposal General Plan Amendment to update the Place Type in
the ReinventPHX Transit Oriented Development
Strategic Policy Framework (and the PlanPHX 2025
General Plan) for the 7th Avenue / Washington and 7th
Avenue / Jefferson station location from Medium Urban
Center to Downtown Core
Location 7th Avenue between Washington Street and Jefferson
Street
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 10-1



VPC DISCUSSION:

Item No. 7 (GPA-CC-2-24-7) and Item No. 8 (Z-TA-6-24-7) are companion cases and
were heard together.

No members of the public registered to speak on this item.

STAFF PRESENTATION
Samuel Rogers, staff, provided a presentation regarding the proposal, reviewing the
surrounding context, policy background, existing and proposed zoning, the proposed
development, and the staff recommendation.

Committee Member Rachel Frazier Johnson inquired about the communication with
the community to determine if there was support or opposition. Mr. Rogers explained
that the Text Amendment followed the same requirements as the rezoning process,
including mailing notices, posting on the property, and meeting with the neighborhood.
Committee Member Frazier Johnson asked whether the mailings were provided in
both English and Spanish and asked about considerations for non-English-speaking
community members. Jeff Stapleton, staff, stated that the notification was sent out in


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Central City Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
January 13, 2025
GPA-CC-2-24-7


English per the rezoning packet and stated that Spanish speakers were considered at
the neighborhood meeting, but the mailers were not bilingual.

Committee Member Janey Pearl Starks asked how many attendees were present at
the neighborhood meeting. Mr. Stapleton stated that there was one attendee.

Committee Member Nate Sonoskey asked how many people were notified. Mr.
Stapleton stated that approximately 60 people were notified, but the area is not heavily
populated, with most notices going to property owners and businesses.

Chair Gaughan noted that the issue of English-only notices has been raised before
and suggested that the City adopt a policy requiring all meeting notices to be in both
English and Spanish.

APPLICANT PRESENTATION
Mr. Stapleton provided an overview of the subject site and surrounding area, the
purpose of the request, the RFP process, desired projects, Capitol Mall development
opportunities, and the RFP/development schedule.

QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE
Committee Member Zach Burns asked whether there would be three RFPs or one
and what would happen with the existing police station. Mr. Stapleton stated that the
number of RFPs has not been determined and stated that discussions are ongoing.

Committee Member Rachel Frazier Johnson asked whether parking would be self-
contained and stated she understood what the maximum number of units allowed
would be but would like to know the number of units the RFP will seek. Mr. Stapleton
responded that the RFP would pursue 20% and explained that parking would meet
code requirements and be self-contained.

Committee Member Patrick Panetta asked about the private ownership of the
adjacent property. Mr. Stapleton confirmed that the adjacent property owner wanted to
be included in the request.

Committee Member Panetta questioned the reasoning behind the 250-foot
entitlement when a 600-foot entitlement is nearby. Mr. Stapleton explained that the
entitlement request was intended to match the adjacent state property and align with
the Downtown Code, which emphasizes step-downs on the perimeter of 7th Avenue.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.

MOTION



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 218
Central City Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
January 13, 2025
GPA-CC-2-24-7


Committee Member Patrick Panetta made a motion to recommend approval of GPA-
CC-2-24-7 per the staff recommendation. Committee Member Zach Burns seconded
the motion.

VOTE
10-1; Motion to recommend approval of GPA-CC-2-24-7 per the staff recommendation
passed; Committee Members Ban, Burns, Burton, Greenman, Frazier Johnson,
Panetta, Sonoskey, Vargas, Martinez, and Gaughan in favor and Committee Member
Starks in opposition.


STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:
None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 219
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-CC-2-24-7
INFORMATION ONLY

Date of VPC Meeting December 9, 2024
Request From Medium Urban Center Place Type
Request To Downtown Core Place Type
Proposal General Plan Amendment to update the Place Type in
the ReinventPHX Transit Oriented Development
Strategic Policy Framework (and the PlanPHX 2025
General Plan) for the 7th Avenue / Washington and 7th
Avenue / Jefferson station location from Medium Urban
Center to Downtown Core
Location 7th Avenue between Washington Street and Jefferson
Street


VPC DISCUSSION:

Item No. 5 (GPA-CC-2-24-7) and Item No. 6 (Z-TA-6-24-7) are companion cases and
were heard together.

No members of the public registered to speak on this item.

STAFF PRESENTATION
Jeff Stapleton with the Community and Economic Development Department provided a
presentation regarding the proposal, reviewing the surrounding context, policy
background, the proposed zoning text and place type designation, and the proposed
timeline.

QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE
Chair O’Grady asked for clarification on the proposed station locations. Mr. Stapleton
showed a map and discussed station locations.

Committee Member Martinez stated that the area for the new police headquarters is a
very dense area. Mr. Stapleton noted that some buildings have been revived in that
area.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Central City Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
December 9, 2024
GPA-CC-2-24-7 - Info Only


Committee Member Sonoskey asked if there would be a rationale for including more
of the surrounding properties. Mr. Stapleton described the surrounding parcels and
stated it would not be feasible on any adjacent parcels.

Ms. Martinez asked for clarification on the location of the elections building. Mr.
Stapleton showed the location on a map.

Committee Member Rachel Frazier Johnson asked if the elections office will be
staying in their location. Mr. Stapleton provided additional background.

Committee Member Ban asked if the requested height increase would be a by-right
height, what would be the affordable housing ratio, and if there would be types of retail
uses prohibited. Mr. Stapleton replied that the height would be by-right and there is not
a specific number for the affordable housing ratio at this time. Xandon Keating with the
Community and Economic Development Department stated that there are some uses
CED doesn’t allow in the RFP.

Committee Member Sonoskey asked about the community outreach conducted. Mr.
Stapleton replied that the required notifications have been sent, and a neighborhood
meeting was held, adding that they have also met with several neighborhood
organizations.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 221
ATTACHMENT D

REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
February 6, 2025

ITEM NO: 3
DISTRICT NO.: 7
SUBJECT:

Application #: GPA-CC-2-24-7 (Companion Case Z-TA-6-24-7)
Location: 7th Avenue / Washington Street / Jefferson Street station area
From: Medium Urban Center
To: Downtown Core
Proposal: General Plan Amendment to update the Place Type in the
Reinvent PHX Transit Oriented Development Strategic Policy
Framework to allow for more height and density to meet the City's
Transit Oriented Development (TOD) goals
Applicant: City of Phoenix, Planning Commission
Representative: Jeff Stapleton, City of Phoenix, Community and Economic
Development Department

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, as shown in the recommended text in Exhibit A of the Staff
Report.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Central City 12/9/2024 Information only.
1/13/2025 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 10-1.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Central City Village Planning
Committee recommendation.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Vice-Chairperson Boyd made a MOTION to approve GPA-CC-2-24-7, per the
Central City Village Planning Committee recommendation.

Maker: Vice-Chairperson Boyd
Second: Jaramillo
Vote: 9-0
Absent: None
Opposition Present: No

Findings:

1. The proposed General Plan Amendment will support greater scale and intensity,
consistent with the Business Core Character Area of the Downtown Code.

2. The updated Center Place Type will serve as a policy guide for future land use
decisions and investments within the station area.




Proposed language:

Amend the TOD Typology Map on page 14 of the ReinventPHX Transit Oriented Development
Strategic Policy Framework by removing the old map and inserting the new map as follows:




Amend page 18 of the ReinventPHX Transit Oriented Development Strategic Policy Framework
by removing the old page and inserting the new page as follows:




***

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact Teleia
Galaviz at 602-291-2559, teleia.galaviz@phoenix.gov, TTY: Use 7-1-1.





Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing - Amend Downtown Code - Ordinance Adoption - Text
Amendment Application Z-TA-6-24-7 (Ordinance G-7368) - District 7

Request for a public hearing on a proposed text amendment to the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance, Text Amendment Z-TA-6-24-7 to amend Chapter 12, Section 1202.B
(Downtown Code, Regulating Maps, Height Map) to amend the Downtown Code
Height Map and to amend the Downtown Code Density Map, for an area bounded by
Adams Street to the north, 7th Avenue to the east, Jefferson Street to the south, and
8th Avenue to the west. This is a companion case to GPA-CC-2-24-7 and should be
heard after GPA-CC-2-24-7.

Summary
The intent of the proposed text amendment is to amend Chapter 12, Section 1202.B
(Downtown Code, Regulating Maps, Height Maps) to amend the Downtown Code
Height Map from a maximum height of 30 feet to a maximum height of 250 feet and
Section 1202.C (Downtown Code, Regulating Maps, Density Map) to amend the
Downtown Code Density Map from 14.5 maximum dwelling units per acre to 218
maximum dwelling units per acre for an area bounded by Adams Street to the north,
7th Avenue to the east, Jefferson Street to the south, and 8th Avenue to the west.

Owner: Mark Victor Dye, Dye Capital LLC and City of Phoenix
Applicant: City of Phoenix, Planning Commission
Representative: Jeff Stapleton, City of Phoenix, Community and Economic
Development Department

Staff Recommendation: Approval, as shown in Exhibit A of the Addendum A Staff
Report.
VPC Information Only: The Central City Village Planning Committee heard this item on
December 9, 2024, for information only.
VPC Action: The Central City Village Planning Committee heard this item on January
13, 2025, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 10-
1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on February 6, 2025, and
recommended approval, per the Central City Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 9-0.




Location
An area bounded by Adams Street to the north, 7th Avenue to the east, Jefferson
Street to the south, and 8th Avenue to the west
Council District: 7
Parcel Addresses: 18 S. 7th Avenue; 701 and 704 W. Adams Street; 701 and 713 W.
Washington Street; 702, 706, 714, and 718 W. Jefferson Street

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE CODE OF
THE CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA, PART II, CHAPTER 41,
THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX BY
AMENDING CHAPTER 12, SECTION 1202.B (DOWNTOWN
CODE, REGULATING MAPS, HEIGHT MAP) TO AMEND THE
DOWNTOWN CODE HEIGHT MAP FROM A MAXIMUM OF
30 FEET TO A MAXIMUM OF 250 FEET AND SECTION
1202.C (DOWNTOWN CODE, REGULATING MAPS,
DENSITY MAP) TO AMEND THE DOWNTOWN CODE
DENSITY MAP FROM 14.5 MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS
PER ACRE TO 218 MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE, FOR AN AREA BOUNDED BY ADAMS STREET TO
THE NORTH, 7TH AVENUE TO EAST, JEFFERSON STREET
TO THE SOUTH, AND 8TH AVENUE TO THE WEST.

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as follows:

SECTION 1: That Chapter 12, Section 1202 (Regulating Maps) to remove the old

maps, and insert new maps, is amended to read as follows:

***

B. Maximum Building Height. This map designates maximum building heights within
Downtown.

1. The height limits shown on the following map are the base requirements and
do not include any height bonuses which may be allowed per other sections of
this Chapter. Additional setbacks may apply at the boundary between different
height zones, per Section 1207.E.

2. No building height may exceed the Airport Height Limits provided in Chapter
4, Article XIII of the Phoenix City Code.




***




C. Maximum Density. This map designates maximum density limits within Downtown.

1. The density limits shown on the following map are the base requirements and
do not include any density bonuses which may be allowed per other sections
of this Chapter.




***




PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 5th day of March, 2025



________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




ATTACHMENT B




Staff Report
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment
Z-TA-6-24-7
November 27, 2024


Application No. Z-TA-6-24-7: Amend Section 1202.C. (Downtown Code, Regulating
Maps, Height Map) of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to amend the Downtown Code
Height Map from a maximum height of 30 feet to a maximum height of 250 feet and
amend Section 1202.D. (Downtown Code, Regulating Maps, Density Map) of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to amend the Downtown Code Density Map from 14.5
maximum dwelling units per acre to 218 maximum dwelling units per acre, for an area
bounded by Adams Street to the north, 7th Avenue to east, Jefferson Street to the
south, and 8th Avenue to the west.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Z-TA-6-24-7 as shown in the
recommended text in Exhibit A.

Background
This request is to amend the regulating
maps in the Downtown Code in the
portion of the Business Core Character
Area bounded by Adams Street to the
north, 7th Avenue to east, Jefferson
Street to the south, and 8th Avenue to
the west as follows:
• Amend the maximum height from 30
feet to 250 feet.
• Amend the maximum density from
14.5 dwelling units per acre to 218
dwelling units per acre.

The Business Core Character Area is
intended to function as a strong regional
center for employment, entertainment,
conventions, tourism, and cultural Downtown Code Character Areas Map,
institutions, drawing visitors from around Source: Planning and Development
the country and attracting residents from Department
throughout the region. The greatest development intensity within the region should be
located within this Character Area. New development should be innovative and



Staff Report: Z-TA-6-24-7
November 27, 2024
Page 2

incorporate small public spaces that promote pedestrian movement and comfort. The
Business Core should have vibrant pedestrian activity and be served frequently by
multiple modes of high quality public transit.

The area affected by the proposed text amendment contains surface parking lots,
vacant land, and a one-story building used by an auto repair business. The majority of
the amendment area is owned by the City of Phoenix. The Planning Commission
initiated this text amendment at the request of the Community and Economic
Development Department to increase the height and density allowed within the area in
order to prepare the sites for future development. There is no specific proposal at this
time.

The regulating maps of the Downtown Code currently permit a maximum height of 30
feet and a maximum density of 14.5 dwelling units per acre within the amendment
area, matching the allowance of the C-3 zoning that was on the site prior to the
adoption of the Downtown Code. The maps below indicate the permitted height and
density within the amendment area and the surrounding portions of the Downtown
Code. West of the amendment area is property zoned C-3 and C-3 H-R allowing a
maximum density of 14.5 dwelling units per acre and a maximum height of 30 feet and
250 feet respectively.




Downtown Code Maximum Density Map, Downtown Code Maximum Height Map,
Source: City of Phoenix Source: City of Phoenix




Staff Report: Z-TA-6-24-7
November 27, 2024
Page 3

Background: Reinvent Phoenix Transit Oriented Development Strategic Policy
Framework

The amendment area is located directly
adjacent to the planned light rail stations
at 7th Avenue / Washington Street /
Jefferson Street. The station area is
identified as a Medium Urban Center
Place Type in the Reinvent Phoenix
Transit Oriented Development Strategic
Policy Framework. Companion case
GPA-CC-2-24-7 proposes to modify the
station area to a Downtown Core Place
Type.


TOD Strategic Policy Framework Placetypes,
Source: City of Phoenix

Background: Urban Form Project and the Downtown Code
The Downtown Urban Form Project was initiated in 2006. The Downtown Phoenix Plan
is a product of the Downtown Phoenix Urban Form Project and was prepared to provide
direction for implementation of the community vision for an active, pedestrian-oriented
and sustainable Downtown. The Downtown Phoenix Plan was adopted by City Council
in 2008 and served as a precursor to the Downtown Code, adopted in 2010, which is
now Chapter 12 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
The area affected by the proposed text
amendment is within the Government
Character Area in the Downtown
Phoenix Plan. The plan states that the
Government Character Area will
continue to be an area of compatible
agency campuses occupied by Federal,
County, and City Governments. One of
the challenges noted in the plan is a lack
of services and amenities such as coffee
shops and restaurants for workers and
visitors. Policy 3-33 is to identify
amenities and improvements that will
help reinforce the civic identity of the
Government Character Area (pg. 3-40). Downtown Phoenix Plan Character Area Map,
Source: Planning and Development
Department




Staff Report: Z-TA-6-24-7
November 27, 2024
Page 4

Staff Analysis
The proposal increases the intensity of future development directly adjacent to the
planned light rail stations at 7th Avenue / Washington Street / Jefferson Street while
providing a transition to lower intensity development west of downtown. The proposal
acknowledges that this location is within the Business Core of downtown, which is
envisioned as having the greatest development intensity in the region, and the proposal
will help address the challenges identified in the Downtown Phoenix Plan, as well as
Policy 3-33, by providing new opportunities for amenities for residents and workers in
the area.
Directly to the east of the amendment area is a portion of the Downtown Code that
allows 310 and 600 feet in height, and a density 218 dwelling units per acre. Under this
proposal, the amendment area would allow 250 feet in height and a density of 218
dwelling units per acre. While the density matches the adjacent properties, the
proposed height steps down and forms a transition to the lower height entitlements west
of the area.
The proposed height and density are consistent with the proposed station area Place
Type of Downtown Core in the Reinvent Phoenix TOD Strategic Policy Framework
(Companion Case GPA-CC-2-24-7).
Conclusion
Staff recommends approval of Z-TA-6-24-7 to amend the permitted height and density
maps of the Downtown Code, as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report. The proposal will
allow an appropriate scale of development within the amendment area, considering the
excellent transit access and the location with the Business Core of Downtown Phoenix.
Writer
Anthony Grande
November 27, 2024

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
Exhibit A: Proposed Language
Exhibit B: Sketch Maps




EXHIBIT A

Proposed Language:

Amend Chapter 12, Section 1202 (Regulating Maps) by removing the old maps, and
inserting the new maps as follows:

***




EXHIBIT A
Z-TA-6-24-7
Page 2


C. The height for any property in the Downtown Area shall not exceed the following
unless a height bonus is allowed by the Character Area and approved by Planning
and Development Department staff, or an appeal is approved by the Design Review
Committee (DRC). In no event can the height exceed the airport height limit:




***



EXHIBIT A
Z-TA-6-24-7
Page 3




***




EXHIBIT A
Z-TA-6-24-7
Page 4

D. The density for any parcel in the Downtown Area shall not exceed the following
unless a density bonus is allowed by the Character Area and approved by the
Planning and Development Department staff or an appeal is approved by the
Design Review Committee (DRC) pursuant to Section 1223 requirements:




***


EXHIBIT A
Z-TA-6-24-7
Page 5




***




TEXT AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: Z-TA-6-24-7 ACRES: 6.47 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: CENTRAL CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 7
APPLICANT: CITY OF PHOENIX
EXISTING:
Maximum Height 30' ( 6.47 +/- Acres)


Proposed Change Area



Maximum Height ADAMS ST
30'



6TH AVE
48'
56'
190'
WASHINGTON ST
310'
575'
600'


JEFFERSON ST



9TH AVE 8TH AVE 7TH AVE


PROPOSED CHANGE:
Maximum Height: 250' ( 6.47 +/- Acres)




ADAMS ST

Proposed Change Area
250' 6TH AVE

WASHINGTON ST




JEFFERSON ST



9TH AVE 8TH AVE 7TH AVE
TEXT AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: Z-TA-6-24-7 ACRES: 6.47 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: CENTRAL CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 7
APPLICANT: CITY OF PHOENIX
EXISTING:
Maximum Density 14.5 du/ac ( 6.47 +/- Acres)




Proposed Change Area
ADAMS ST



Maximum Density 6TH AVE
14.5 du/ac
WASHINGTON ST
43.5 du/ac

218 du/ac


JEFFERSON ST



9TH AVE 8TH AVE 7TH AVE


PROPOSED CHANGE:
Maximum Density 218 du/ac ( 6.47 +/- Acres)




ADAMS ST

Proposed Change Area
218 du/ac 6TH AVE

WASHINGTON ST




JEFFERSON ST



9TH AVE 8TH AVE 7TH AVE
ATTACHMENT C




ADDENDUM A
Staff Report
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment
Z-TA-6-24-7
December 31, 2024


Application No. Z-TA-6-24-7: Amend Section 1202.B. (Downtown Code, Regulating
Maps, Height Map) of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to amend the Downtown Code
Height Map from a maximum height of 30 feet to a maximum height of 250 feet and
amend Section 1202.C. (Downtown Code, Regulating Maps, Density Map) of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to amend the Downtown Code Density Map from 14.5
maximum dwelling units per acre to 218 maximum dwelling units per acre, for an area
bounded by Adams Street to the north, 7th Avenue to east, Jefferson Street to the
south, and 8th Avenue to the west.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Z-TA-6-24-7 as shown in the
recommended text in Exhibit A.

Background
The purpose of this addendum is to revise section numbers and the existing text and
maps in the Downtown Code to reflect the recent update from Text Amendment No. Z-
TA-5-22-4-7-8, which was approved by City Council on December 4, 2024. Relevant
updates to the Downtown Code from that amendment include revisions to section
numbers and associated language. Therefore, this addendum will update the proposed
language (Exhibit A) to reflect the new section numbers being amended and the new
existing maps that are being replaced, in addition to unchanged text. There are no new
changes to the proposed height or density. Staff recommends approval of Z-TA-6-24-7,
as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report.

Writer
Anthony Grande
December 31, 2024

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
Exhibit A: Proposed Language
Exhibit B: Sketch Maps



EXHIBIT A

Proposed Language:

Amend Chapter 12, Section 1202 (Regulating Maps) by removing the old maps, and
inserting the new maps as follows:

***

B. Maximum Building Height. This map designates maximum building heights within
Downtown.

1. The height limits shown on the following map are the base requirements and
do not include any height bonuses which may be allowed per other sections of
this Chapter. Additional setbacks may apply at the boundary between different
height zones, per Section 1207.E.

2. No building height may exceed the Airport Height Limits provided in Chapter
4, Article XIII of the Phoenix City Code.




EXHIBIT A
Z-TA-6-24-7
Page 2




***




EXHIBIT A
Z-TA-6-24-7
Page 3




***




EXHIBIT A
Z-TA-6-24-7
Page 4

C. Maximum Density. This map designates maximum density limits within Downtown.

1. The density limits shown on the following map are the base requirements and
do not include any density bonuses which may be allowed per other sections
of this Chapter.




***


EXHIBIT A
Z-TA-6-24-7
Page 5




***




ATTACHMENT D




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-6-24-7

Date of VPC Meeting January 13, 2025
Request Amend Section 1202.B. (Downtown Code, Regulating
Maps, Height Map) of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to
amend the Downtown Code Height Map from a
maximum height of 30 feet to a maximum height of 250
feet and amend Section 1202.C. (Downtown Code,
Regulating Maps, Density Map) of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance to amend the Downtown Code Density Map
from 14.5 maximum dwelling units per acre to 218
maximum dwelling units per acre
Location An area bounded by Adams Street to the north, 7th
Avenue to east, Jefferson Street to the south, and 8th
Avenue to the west
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation

VPC Vote 10-1



VPC DISCUSSION:

Item No. 7 (GPA-CC-2-24-7) and Item No. 8 (Z-TA-6-24-7) are companion cases and
were heard together.

No members of the public registered to speak on this item.

STAFF PRESENTATION
Samuel Rogers, staff, provided a presentation regarding the proposal, reviewing the
surrounding context, policy background, existing and proposed zoning, the proposed
development, and the staff recommendation.

Committee Member Rachel Frazier Johnson inquired about the communication
with the community to determine if there was support or opposition. Mr. Rogers
explained that the Text Amendment followed the same requirements as the rezoning
process, including mailing notices, posting on the property, and meeting with the
neighborhood.


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Central City Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-TA-6-24-7
January 13, 2024


Committee Member Frazier Johnson asked whether the mailings were provided in
both English and Spanish and asked about considerations for non-English-speaking
community members. Jeff Stapleton, staff, stated that the notification was sent out in
English per the rezoning packet and stated that Spanish speakers were considered at
the neighborhood meeting, but the mailers were not bilingual.

Committee Member Janey Pearl Starks asked how many attendees were present at
the neighborhood meeting. Mr. Stapleton stated that there was one attendee.

Committee Member Nate Sonoskey asked how many people were notified. Mr.
Stapleton stated that approximately 60 people were notified, but the area is not
heavily populated, with most notices going to property owners and businesses.

Chair Gaughan noted that the issue of English-only notices has been raised before
and suggested that the City adopt a policy requiring all meeting notices to be in both
English and Spanish.

APPLICANT PRESENTATION
Mr. Stapleton provided an overview of the subject site and surrounding area, the
purpose of the request, the RFP process, desired projects, Capitol Mall development
opportunities, and the RFP/development schedule.

QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE
Committee Member Zach Burns asked whether there would be three RFPs or one
and what would happen with the existing police station. Mr. Stapleton stated that the
number of RFPs has not been determined and stated that discussions are ongoing.

Committee Member Rachel Frazier Johnson asked whether parking would be self-
contained and stated she understood what the maximum number of units allowed
would be but would like to know the number of units the RFP will seek. Mr. Stapleton
responded that the RFP would pursue 20% and explained that parking would meet
code requirements and be self-contained.

Committee Member Patrick Panetta asked about the private ownership of the
adjacent property. Mr. Stapleton confirmed that the adjacent property owner wanted
to be included in the request.

Committee Member Panetta questioned the reasoning behind the 250-foot
entitlement when a 600-foot entitlement is nearby. Mr. Stapleton explained that the
entitlement request was intended to match the adjacent state property and align with
the Downtown Code, which emphasizes step-downs on the perimeter of 7th Avenue.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 253
Central City Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-TA-6-24-7
January 13, 2024


MOTION
Committee Member Zach Burns made a motion to recommend approval of Z-TA-6-
24-7 per the staff recommendation. Committee Member Rachel Frazier Johnson
seconded the motion.

VOTE
10-1; Motion to recommend approval of Z-TA-6-24-7 per the staff recommendation
passed; Committee Members Ban, Burns, Burton, Greenman, Frazier Johnson,
Panetta, Sonoskey, Vargas, Martinez, and Gaughan in favor and Committee Member
Starks in opposition

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 254
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-6-24-7
INFORMATION ONLY

Date of VPC Meeting December 9, 2024
Request Amend Section 1202.B. (Downtown Code, Regulating
Maps, Height Map) of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to
amend the Downtown Code Height Map from a
maximum height of 30 feet to a maximum height of 250
feet and amend Section 1202.C. (Downtown Code,
Regulating Maps, Density Map) of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance to amend the Downtown Code Density Map
from 14.5 maximum dwelling units per acre to 218
maximum dwelling units per acre
Location An area bounded by Adams Street to the north, 7th
Avenue to east, Jefferson Street to the south, and 8th
Avenue to the west



VPC DISCUSSION:

Item No. 5 (GPA-CC-2-24-7) and Item No. 6 (Z-TA-6-24-7) are companion cases and
were heard together.

No members of the public registered to speak on this item.

STAFF PRESENTATION
Jeff Stapleton with the Community and Economic Development Department provided
a presentation regarding the proposal, reviewing the surrounding context, policy
background, the proposed zoning text and place type designation, and the proposed
timeline.

QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE
Chair O’Grady asked for clarification on the proposed station locations. Mr.
Stapleton showed a map and discussed station locations.

Committee Member Martinez stated that the area for the new police headquarters is
a very dense area. Mr. Stapleton noted that some buildings have been revived in that
area.


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Central City Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-TA-6-24-7 - Info Only


Committee Member Sonoskey asked if there would be a rationale for including more
of the surrounding properties. Mr. Stapleton described the surrounding parcels and
stated it would not be feasible on any adjacent parcels.

Ms. Martinez asked for clarification on the location of the elections building. Mr.
Stapleton showed the location on a map.

Committee Member Rachel Frazier Johnson asked if the elections office will be
staying in their location. Mr. Stapleton provided additional background.

Committee Member Ban asked if the requested height increase would be a by-right
height, what would be the affordable housing ratio, and if there would be types of
retail uses prohibited. Mr. Stapleton replied that the height would be by-right and
there is not a specific number for the affordable housing ratio at this time. Xandon
Keating with the Community and Economic Development Department stated that
there are some uses CED doesn’t allow in the RFP.

Committee Member Sonoskey asked about the community outreach conducted. Mr.
Stapleton replied that the required notifications have been sent, and a neighborhood
meeting was held, adding that they have also met with several neighborhood
organizations.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 256
ATTACHMENT E

REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
February 6, 2025

ITEM NO: 4
DISTRICT NO.: 7
SUBJECT:

Application #: Z-TA-6-24-7 (Companion Case GPA-CC-2-24-7)
Request: Text Amendment to Chapter 12 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to update
the height and density maps.
Location: An area bounded by Adams Street to the north, 7th Avenue to east,
Jefferson Street to the south, and 8th Avenue to the west.
Proposal: Amend Section 1202.B. (Downtown Code, Regulating Maps, Height Map)
of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to amend the Downtown Code Height
Map from a maximum height of 30 feet to a maximum height of 250 feet
and amend Section 1202.C. (Downtown Code, Regulating Maps, Density
Map) of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to amend the Downtown Code
Density Map from 14.5 maximum dwelling units per acre to 218 maximum
dwelling units per acre.
Applicant: City of Phoenix, Planning Commission
Owner: City of Phoenix and Mark Victor Dye, Dye Capital, LLC
Representative: Jeff Stapleton, City of Phoenix, Community and Economic Development
Department

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, as shown in the recommended text in Exhibit A of the
Addendum A Staff Report.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Central City 12/9/2024 Information only.
1/13/2025 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 10-1.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Central City Village Planning
Committee recommendation.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Vice-Chairperson Boyd made a MOTION to approve Z-TA-6-24-7, per the
Central City Village Planning Committee recommendation.

Maker: Vice-Chairperson Boyd
Second: James
Vote: 9-0
Absent: None
Opposition Present: No

Findings:

1. The proposed height and density are consistent with the proposed station area Place
Type of Downtown Core in the Reinvent Phoenix TOD Strategic Policy Framework
(Companion Case GPA-CC-2-24-7).


2. The proposal will allow an appropriate scale of development within the amendment
area, considering the excellent transit access and the location with the Business Core
of Downtown Phoenix.

Proposed language:

Amend Chapter 12, Section 1202 (Regulating Maps) by removing the old maps, and
inserting the new maps as follows:

***

B. Maximum Building Height. This map designates maximum building heights within
Downtown.

1. The height limits shown on the following map are the base requirements and do
not include any height bonuses which may be allowed per other sections of this
Chapter. Additional setbacks may apply at the boundary between different
height zones, per Section 1207.E.

2. No building height may exceed the Airport Height Limits provided in Chapter 4,
Article XIII of the Phoenix City Code.




***




***

C. Maximum Density. This map designates maximum density limits within Downtown.


1. The density limits shown on the following map are the base requirements and
do not include any density bonuses which may be allowed per other sections of
this Chapter.

***




***

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact Teleia
Galaviz at 602-291-2559, teleia.galaviz@phoenix.gov, TTY: Use 7-1-1.







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
(CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 5, 2025) - Public Hearing and Ordinance
Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-119-24-2 - Southeast Corner of 56th Street
and Shea Boulevard (Ordinance G-7359) - District 2

Request to hold a public hearing and amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section
601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-119-
24-2 and rezone the site from RE-43 (One-Family Residence) to C-O/G-O (Restricted
Commercial, General Office Option) to allow office.

Summary
Current Zoning: RE-43
Proposed Zoning: C-O/G-O
Acreage: 2.59
Proposal: Office

Owner: Ronald Urman, 56 & Shea Holdings, LLC
Applicant/Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris Baugh P.L.C.

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee was scheduled to hear
this item on December 2, 2024, for recommendation; however, there was no quorum.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on January 2, 2025, and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, with two additional stipulations,
by a vote of 6-2.

Location
Southeast corner of 56th Street and Shea Boulevard
Council District: 2
Parcel Address: 10425, 10433, 10437, and 10455 N. 56th Street

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-119-24-2) FROM RE-43 (ONE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE) TO C-O/G-O (RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL,
GENERAL OFFICE OPTION).
____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 2.59-acre property located at the southeast

corner of 56th Street and Shea Boulevard in a portion of Section 28, Township 3 North,

Range 4 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from

“RE-43” (One-Family Residence) to “C-O/G-O” (Restricted Commercial, General Office

Option).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,




violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The elevations shall contain design elements of residential character, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

2. A minimum 20-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along the north
property line, adjacent to Shea Boulevard, and shall be planted with minimum 2-
inch caliper, large canopy, shade trees, planted 20 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings, and shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers evenly
distributed throughout the landscape area to achieve a minimum of 50% live
coverage, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

3. The west 25 feet of the property, measured from the west property line adjacent
to 56th Street, shall be landscaped with minimum 2-inch caliper, large canopy,
shade trees, planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, and shrubs,
accents, and vegetative groundcovers evenly distributed throughout the
landscape area to achieve a minimum of 50% live coverage, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

4. A minimum 10-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along the south
and east property lines and shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, large
canopy, shade trees, planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, and
shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers evenly distributed throughout the
landscape area to achieve a minimum of 50% live coverage, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

5. A minimum of 10% of surface parking areas (exclusive of required/stipulated
landscape setbacks) shall be landscaped. Surface parking areas shall achieve a
minimum of 25% shade with minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy,
shade trees, dispersed throughout the landscape areas, as approved by
Planning and Development Department.

6. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

7. All bicycle parking, pedestrian pathways (including sidewalks), and transit stops
shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping, or a combination of the two to
provide a minimum of 75% shade, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

8. Bicycle parking shall be provided per the requirements of Section 1307.H of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance and shall be provided through Inverted U and/or
artistic racks located near building entrances and installed per the requirements
of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Artistic racks shall adhere


to the City of Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the Comprehensive
Bicycle Master Plan.

9. A minimum of 10% of the required bicycle parking spaces shall include standard
electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

10. A minimum of 5% of the required vehicle parking spaces shall include Electric
Vehicle (EV) Installed Infrastructure and a minimum of 20% of the vehicle
parking spaces within the underground parking garage shall include EV
Capable spaces, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

11. A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for
stormwater management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This
includes but is not limited to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales,
permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure
and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater Management.

12. Only landscape materials listed in the Phoenix Active Management Area Low-
Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List shall be utilized, as approved or modified
by the Planning and Development Department.

13. Natural turf shall only be utilized in required retention areas (bottom of basin,
and only allowed on slopes if required for slope stabilization) and functional turf
areas in common areas, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

14. Pressure regulating sprinkler heads and drip lines shall be utilized in any turf
areas to reduce water waste.

15. Landscaping shall be maintained by permanent and automatic/water efficient
WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers (or similar smart controller) to minimize
maintenance and irrigation water consumption for all on and offsite landscape
irrigation.

16. Provide a landscape irrigation plan that includes zones to establish the amount
of irrigation to apply based on maturity and type of the landscaping. Irrigation
should be applied efficiently based on the maturity and need for the vegetation.

17. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the Phoenix Water Efficiency
Checkup program for a minimum of 10 years, or as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

18. The existing bus pad on eastbound Shea Boulevard, adjacent to the
development, shall be retained.



19. A minimum of 65 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for the
south half of Shea Boulevard, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

20. The streetscape beginning at the back of curb along the south side of Shea
Boulevard on both sides of the sidewalk, adjacent to the development, shall be
replenished with minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees
planted 20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings, and shrubs, accents and
vegetative groundcovers with a maximum mature height of two feet evenly
distributed throughout the landscape area to achieve a minimum of 75% live
coverage, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

21. A minimum 6-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum 8-foot-wide
landscape strip located between the back of curb and sidewalk shall be
constructed on the east side of 56th Street, adjacent to the development,
planted to the following standards and as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees, planted
20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings.

b. Shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers with a maximum mature
height of two feet evenly distributed throughout the landscape area to
achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

22. An enhanced pedestrian connection shall be provided on the Shea Boulevard
frontage to allow for direct pedestrian access to the adjacent transit stop, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

23. All existing overhead utilities within the public right-of-way, adjacent to the
development, and on-site shall be undergrounded. The developer shall
coordinate with all affected utility companies for their review and permitting.

24. Unused driveways shall be replaced with sidewalk, curb and gutter. Also, any
broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on all streets shall
be replaced and all off-site improvements shall be upgraded to be in compliance
with current ADA guidelines.

25. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.



26. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

27. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder’s Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

28. The location(s) of any driveway accessing the property from 56th Street shall be
per the accepted Traffic Impact Analysis by the Street Transportation
Department.

29. A traffic control device and signage shall be provided to discourage left-out
turning movements from the property on to 56th Street.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 5th day of February,

2025.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney




By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 page)




EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-119-24-2

A PORTION OF COUNTRY CLUB ACRES RECORDED IN BOOK 70, PAGE 21 OF
THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY LOCATED IN SECTION 28,
TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH AND RANGE 4 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE
AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.

BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 28;

THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 28, A DISTANCE OF 337.59 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 09 WEST, A DISTANCE OF 337.46’ TO
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 37 OF SAID COUNTRY CLUB ACRES;

THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 04 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
337.57 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 28;

THENCE NORTH, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 28, A DISTANCE OF
337.66 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;

DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINING, 2.6141 ACRES.




ATTACHMENT B




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024

Paradise Valley Village Planning December 2, 2024
Committee Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: January 2, 2025

Request From: RE-43 (One-Family Residence) (2.59 acres)
Request To: C-O/G-O (Restricted Commercial, General
Office Option) (2.59 acres)
Proposal: Office
Location: Southeast corner of 56th Street and Shea
Boulevard
Owner: Ronald Urman, 56 & Shea Holdings, LLC
Applicant/Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations

General Plan Conformity
General Plan Land Use Map Designation Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre

Street Classification Shea Boulevard Major Arterial 40-foot south half street
Map Designation 56th Street Minor Collector 40-foot east half street
CONNET PEOPLE & PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE
PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity, respectful of local
conditions and surrounding neighborhoods.

The proposal for an office use is a reasonable level of increased intensity and as
stipulated, will be respectful of local conditions and surrounding neighborhoods. The
building elevations will be residential in character, and there will be an enhanced buffer
adjacent to the single-family residentially zoned properties.

CONNECT PEOPLE & PLACES CORE VALUE; BICYCLES; DESIGN PRINCIPLE:
Development should include convenient bicycle parking.

As stipulated, the proposal will provide bicycle parking. This bicycle parking will provide
employees and visitors with an alternative mode of transportation to the site.




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024

BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY; TREES AND SHADE; DESIGN
PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new development and
redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.

As stipulated, the proposal will provide tree-shaded sidewalks along both street
frontages, will plant trees within perimeter landscape setbacks and surface parking
areas, and will shade bicycle parking, pedestrian walkways, the transit stop along Shea
Boulevard, and surface parking areas.



Applicable Plan, Overlays, and Initiatives
Tree and Shade Master Plan: See Background Item No. 6.

Complete Streets Guiding Principles: See Background Item No. 7.

Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan: See Background Item No. 8.

Zero Waste PHX: See Background Item No. 9.

Transportation Electrification Action Plan: See Background Item No. 10.

Phoenix Climate Action Plan: See Background Item No. 11.

Conservation Measures for New Development: See Background Item No. 12.



Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning
Land Use Zoning
Sports field, basketball court, and
On Site RE-43
playground
North (across
Golf resort and single-family residence RH and RE-35
Shea Boulevard)
South Vacant RE-43
East Church and monopalm RE-43
West (across 56th
Church and private school RE-43
Street)




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024

C-O/G-O (Restricted Commercial, General Office Option)

Standards Requirements Proposed

Minimum Gross Lot Area 1 acre 2.59 acres (Met)
Maximum Lot Coverage 40%, exclusive of carports; 10% 39.56% (Met)
for open carports, not counted
towards lot coverage
Maximum Building Height 25 feet 25 feet (Met)
Minimum Building Setbacks
Front Yard 20 feet 20 feet – approx. 27 feet
(North, Shea Boulevard) (Met)
Street Side Yard 10 feet 10 feet (Met)
(West, 56th Street)
Side Yard 10 feet 80 feet, 6 inches –
(East) approx. 156 feet (Met)
Rear Yard 25 feet Approx. 29 feet –
(South) approx. 34 feet (Met)
Minimum Parking 136 spaces required 136 spaces (Met)
1 space per 200 square feet of
gross floor area between
exterior walls
27,107 square feet gross floor
area proposed
*Site plan modification or variance required

Background/Issues/Analysis

SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone 2.59 acres located at the southeast corner of 56th
Street and Shea Boulevard from RE-43 (One-Family Residence) to C-O/G-O
(Restricted Commercial, General Office Option) to allow office uses.

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION
2. The General Plan Land Use Map designation for the subject site is Residential 1
to 2 dwelling units per acre. The proposal is inconsistent with the General Plan
Land Use Map designation; however, a minor General Plan Amendment is not
required since the site is less than 10 gross acres in size.

The General Plan Land Use Map designation is also Residential 1 to 2 dwelling
units per acre to the north, east, and south of the subject site.




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024

The General Plan Land Use Map designation for a portion to the north of the
subject site, across Shea Boulevard, is designated as Parks/Open Space –
Privately Owned.

The General Plan Land Use Map designation to the west of the subject site,
across 56th Street, is designated as Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre.




General Plan Land Use Map
Source: Planning and Development Department

SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
3. To the north of the subject site, across Shea Boulevard, is a golf resort and a
single-family residence, zoned RH (Resort District) and RE-35 (Single-Family
Residence District), respectively.

To the south of the subject site is vacant land zoned RE-43 (One-Family
Residence).

To the east of the subject site is a church and monopalm zoned RE-43.

To the west of the subject site, across 56th Street, is a church and private school
zoned RE-43.




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024




Zoning Sketch Map
Source: Planning and Development Department

PROPOSAL
4. Site Plan
The site plan, attached as an exhibit, proposes two medical office buildings with
a total building footprint of 34,957 square feet. Vehicular access is proposed
along 56th Street and Shea Boulevard. A total of 136 parking spaces are
proposed, including six accessible parking spaces and 44 underground parking
spaces. Two pedestrian pathways are proposed to connect to the sidewalk along
56th Street and one pedestrian pathway to connect to the sidewalk along Shea
Boulevard. An 18-foot-wide pedestrian walkway is proposed to connect the north
and south buildings across the drive aisle. Bicycle parking is proposed near the
north building.

To enhance the streetscape along Shea Boulevard, and to be more compatible
with surrounding land uses and zoning, staff recommends that a minimum 20-
foot landscape setback be provided along the north property line, adjacent to
Shea Boulevard, planted with minimum two-inch caliper shade trees 20 feet on
center, and a minimum of 50 percent live coverage. This is addressed in
Stipulation No. 2.




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024


To enhance the streetscape along 56th Street to be consistent with the
streetscape along Shea Boulevard, and to be more compatible with surrounding
land uses and zoning, staff recommends that the west 25 feet of the property
measured from the west property line (the 25-foot right-of-way easement) be
landscaped with minimum two-inch caliper shade trees 20 feet on center and a
minimum of 50 percent live coverage. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 3.

To provide an enhanced buffer adjacent to single-family residentially zoned
properties to the east and south, staff recommends that a minimum 10-foot
landscape setback be provided along the south and east property lines, planted
with minimum two-inch caliper shade trees 20 feet on center, and a minimum of
50 percent live coverage. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 4.

To enhance surface parking lot area landscaping and shading, staff recommends
that a minimum of 10 percent of surface parking areas, exclusive of landscape
required/stipulated setbacks, be landscaped and achieve a minimum of 25
percent shade with minimum two-inch caliper shade trees. This is addressed in
Stipulation No. 5.

To enhance pedestrian safety, staff recommends that where pedestrian
walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway be constructed with a material or
pavement treatment that visually contrasts the pathway with the parking and
drive aisle surfaces. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 6.

To enhance bicyclist, pedestrian, and transit rider comfort, staff recommends that
all bicycle parking spaces, pedestrian pathways, and transit stops be shaded a
minimum of 75 percent. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 7.

Since the existing landscape strip between the back of curb and detached
sidewalk along Shea Boulevard has missing landscape plantings, staff
recommends the streetscape be replenished with minimum two-inch caliper
shade trees 20 feet on center and a minimum of 75 percent live coverage, in
order to increase pedestrian comfort and safety. This is addressed in Stipulation
No. 20.

5. Elevations
The building elevations and renderings, attached as an exhibit, proposes a
contemporary building design with a maximum building height of 25 feet.

To ensure the proposal remains in character with the surrounding residentially
zoned area, staff recommends that the elevations contain design elements of
residential character. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 1.




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024

PLANS, OVERLAYS, AND INITATIVES
6. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan has a goal of treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure that trees are an integral part of the city’s planning and
development process. By investing in trees and the urban forest, the city can
reduce its carbon footprint, decrease energy costs, reduce storm water runoff,
increase biodiversity, address the urban heat island effect, clean the air, and
increase property values. In addition, trees can help to create walkable streets
and vibrant pedestrian places. Staff is recommending robust tree planting
standards, including perimeter landscape setbacks with minimum two-inch
caliper shade trees 20 feet on center, surface parking lot areas to be planted with
minimum two-inch caliper shade trees to achieve 25 percent shade, bicycle
parking spaces, pedestrian pathways, and transit stops to be shaded a minimum
of 75 percent, and detached tree-shaded sidewalks along both street frontages.
These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 2 through 5, 7, 20, and 21.

7. Complete Streets Guiding Principles
In 2014, the City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding
Principles. The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an
accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such as
bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. To support these principles and to
enhance the streetscape, staff recommends the following:
• Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of alternative materials or other pavement treatments that
visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces.
• All bicycle parking, pedestrian pathways (including sidewalks) and transit
stops shall be shaded a minimum of 75 percent.
• The streetscape along the south side of Shea Boulevard be replenished
with minimum two-inch caliper shade trees 20 feet on center and a
minimum of 75 percent live coverage.
• A minimum six-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum
eight-foot-wide landscape strip be constructed on the east side of 56th
Street, adjacent to the development, planted with minimum two-inch
caliper shade trees 20 feet on center and 75 percent live coverage.
• An enhanced pedestrian connection be provided on the Shea Boulevard
frontage to allow for direct pedestrian access to the adjacent transit stop.

These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 6, 7, and 20 through 22.

8. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
The City of Phoenix adopted the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan in 2014 to
guide the development of its Bikeway System and supportive infrastructure. The
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan supports options for both short- and long-



Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024

term bicycle parking as a means of promoting bicyclist traffic to a variety of
destinations. As stipulated, the project will provide bicycle parking per the
requirements of Section 1307.H of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, located near
building entrances and installed per the requirements in the City’s Walkable
Urban (WU) Code. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 8.

9. Zero Waste PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal
to become a zero-waste city, as part of the City’s overall 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and
expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs. Section 716 of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance establishes standards to encourage the provision of
recycling containers for multifamily, commercial, and mixed-use developments
meeting certain criteria. The applicant’s submittal materials indicate that the
proposal will provide dedicated recycling containers in each refuse enclosure
throughout the site and dedicated recycling bins in all common areas.

10. Transportation Electrification Action Plan
In June 2022, the Phoenix City Council approved the Transportation
Electrification Action Plan. The current market desire for the electrification of
transportation is both a national and global phenomenon, fueled by a desire for
better air quality, a reduction in carbon emissions, and a reduction in vehicle
operating and maintenance costs. Businesses, governments and the public are
signaling strong future demand for electric vehicles (EVs), and many automobile
manufacturers have declared plans for a transition to fully electric offerings within
the coming decade. The Plan contains policy initiatives to prepare the City for a
future filled with more EVs, charging infrastructure and e-mobility equity, and
outlines a roadmap for a five-step plan to prepare for the EV infrastructure needs
of 280,000 EVs in Phoenix by 2030. One goal of the Plan to accelerate public
adoption of electric vehicles through workplace, business, and multifamily
charging infrastructure recommends a standard stipulation for rezoning cases to
provide EV charging infrastructure. To enforce the goals of the Plan, staff
recommends a minimum of 10 percent of the required bicycle parking spaces
include electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities, that a
minimum of five percent of the required vehicle parking spaces include EV
Installed infrastructure, and that a minimum of 20 percent of the vehicle parking
spaces within the underground parking garage include EV Capable
infrastructure. This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 9 and 10.

11. Phoenix Climate Action Plan
In October 2021, the Phoenix City Council approved the Climate Action Plan.
The Climate Action Plan will serve as a long-term plan to achieve greenhouse
gas emissions reductions and resiliency goals from local operations and
community activities as well as prepare for the impacts of climate change. This
plan contains policy and initiatives regarding stationary energy, transportation,




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024

waste management, air quality, local food systems, heat, and water. Goal W2
(Water), Action W2.4, pertains to the implementation of the Greater Phoenix
Metro Green Infrastructure and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative
Stormwater Management to benefit the environment, promote water
conservation, reduce urban heat, improve the public health, and create additional
green spaces. This goal is addressed in Stipulation No. 11, which requires a
minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for stormwater
management to be implemented in this development.

12. Conservation Measures for New Development
In June 2023, the Phoenix City Council adopted the Conservation Measures for
New Development policy as part of a resolution addressing the future water
consumption of new development (Resolution 22129). This resolution addresses
the future water consumption of new development to support one of the City’s
Five Core Values in the General Plan which calls for Phoenix to “Build the
Sustainable Desert City”. The Conservation Measures for New Development
policy includes direction to develop standards for consideration as stipulations for
all rezoning cases that will address best practices related to water usage in nine
specific categories. This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 11 through 17, which
addresses the following:
• A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements to be
implemented.
• Only landscape materials listed in the Phoenix Active Management Area
Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List are to be utilized.
• Natural turf is to only be utilized in required retention areas (at the bottom
of the basin, and only allowed on slopes if required for slope stabilization)
and functional turf areas.
• Pressure regulating sprinkler heads and drip lines are to be utilized in any
turf areas to reduce water waste.
• Landscaping is to be maintained by permanent and automatic/water
efficient WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers (or similar smart
controller) to minimize maintenance and irrigation water consumption for
all on and offsite landscape irrigation.
• A landscape irrigation plan to be provided that includes zoned to establish
the amount of irrigation to apply based on maturity and type of
landscaping. Irrigation to be applied efficiently based on the maturity and
need for the vegetation.
• Prior to final site plan approval, documentation is to be provided that
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the Phoenix Water Efficiency
Checkup program for a minimum of 10 years.

COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
13. At the time this staff report was written, staff had not received any letters of
opposition or support.




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024

INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
14. Public Transit Department
The Public Transit Department commented that the bus pad on eastbound Shea
Boulevard shall be retained. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 18.

15. Street Transportation Department
The Street Transportation Department requested the following:
• A minimum of 65 feet of right-of way be dedicated and constructed for the
south half of Shea Boulevard.
• A minimum six-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum
eight-foot-wide landscape area be constructed on the east side of 56th
Street, adjacent to the development.
• An enhanced pedestrian connection be provided on the Shea Boulevard
frontage to allow for direct pedestrian access to the adjacent transit stop.
• That all existing overhead utilities within the public right-of-way, adjacent
to the development, and on-site be undergrounded.
• That any broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on
all streets be replaced, and that all off-site improvements be upgraded to
be in compliance with current ADA guidelines.
• That all streets be constructed with all required elements and to ADA
requirements.

These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 19 and 21 through 25.

OTHER
16. The site has not been identified as being archaeologically sensitive. However, in
the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, all
ground disturbing activities must cease within 33-feet of the discovery and the
time to properly assess the materials. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 26.

17. Staff has not received a completed form for the Waiver of Claims for Diminution
in Value of Property under Proposition 207 (A.R.S. 12-1131 et seq.), as required
by the rezoning application process. Therefore, a stipulation has been added to
require the form be completed and submitted prior to final site plan approval. This
is addressed in Stipulation No. 27.

18. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and
ordinances. Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements.
Other formal actions such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and
abandonments, may be required.




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024

Findings

1. As stipulated, the proposal increases shade tree canopy coverage along public
sidewalks, bicycle parking, pedestrian pathways, and transit stops.

2. As stipulated, the proposal is compatible with adjacent land uses and zoning and
provides an increased buffer adjacent to single-family residential zoning.

3. As stipulated, the proposal supports efforts from various plans, policies, and
initiatives, including the Tree and Shade Master Plan, the Complete Streets
Guiding Principles, the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan, the Transportation
Electrification Action Plan, the Phoenix Climate Action Plan, and the
Conservation Measures for New Development policy.

Stipulations

1. The elevations shall contain design elements of residential character, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

2. A minimum 20-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along the north
property line, adjacent to Shea Boulevard, and shall be planted with minimum 2-
inch caliper, large canopy, shade trees, planted 20 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings, and shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers evenly
distributed throughout the landscape area to achieve a minimum of 50% live
coverage, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

3. The west 25 feet of the property, measured from the west property line adjacent
to 56th Street, shall be landscaped with minimum 2-inch caliper, large canopy,
shade trees, planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, and shrubs,
accents, and vegetative groundcovers evenly distributed throughout the
landscape area to achieve a minimum of 50% live coverage, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

4. A minimum 10-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along the south
and east property lines and shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, large
canopy, shade trees, planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, and
shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers evenly distributed throughout the
landscape area to achieve a minimum of 50% live coverage, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

5. A minimum of 10% of surface parking areas (exclusive of required/stipulated
landscape setbacks) shall be landscaped. Surface parking areas shall achieve a
minimum of 25% shade with minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy,
shade trees, dispersed throughout the landscape areas, as approved by
Planning and Development Department.




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024


6. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

7. All bicycle parking, pedestrian pathways (including sidewalks), and transit stops
shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping, or a combination of the two to
provide a minimum of 75% shade, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

8. Bicycle parking shall be provided per the requirements of Section 1307.H of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance and shall be provided through Inverted U and/or
artistic racks located near building entrances and installed per the requirements
of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Artistic racks shall adhere
to the City of Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the Comprehensive
Bicycle Master Plan.

9. A minimum of 10% of the required bicycle parking spaces shall include standard
electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

10. A minimum of 5% of the required vehicle parking spaces shall include Electric
Vehicle (EV) Installed Infrastructure and a minimum of 20% of the vehicle
parking spaces within the underground parking garage shall include EV
Capable spaces, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

11. A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for
stormwater management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This
includes but is not limited to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales,
permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure
and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater Management.

12. Only landscape materials listed in the Phoenix Active Management Area Low-
Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List shall be utilized, as approved or modified
by the Planning and Development Department.

13. Natural turf shall only be utilized in required retention areas (bottom of basin,
and only allowed on slopes if required for slope stabilization) and functional turf
areas in common areas, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

14. Pressure regulating sprinkler heads and drip lines shall be utilized in any turf
areas to reduce water waste.




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024


15. Landscaping shall be maintained by permanent and automatic/water efficient
WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers (or similar smart controller) to minimize
maintenance and irrigation water consumption for all on and offsite landscape
irrigation.

16. Provide a landscape irrigation plan that includes zones to establish the amount
of irrigation to apply based on maturity and type of the landscaping. Irrigation
should be applied efficiently based on the maturity and need for the vegetation.

17. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the Phoenix Water Efficiency
Checkup program for a minimum of 10 years, or as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

18. The existing bus pad on eastbound Shea Boulevard, adjacent to the
development, shall be retained.

19. A minimum of 65 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for the
south half of Shea Boulevard, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

20. The streetscape beginning at the back of curb along the south side of Shea
Boulevard on both sides of the sidewalk, adjacent to the development, shall be
replenished with minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees
planted 20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings, and shrubs, accents and
vegetative groundcovers with a maximum mature height of two feet evenly
distributed throughout the landscape area to achieve a minimum of 75% live
coverage, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

21. A minimum 6-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum 8-foot-wide
landscape strip located between the back of curb and sidewalk shall be
constructed on the east side of 56th Street, adjacent to the development,
planted to the following standards and as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees, planted
20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings.

b. Shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers with a maximum mature
height of two feet evenly distributed throughout the landscape area to
achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage.




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

22. An enhanced pedestrian connection shall be provided on the Shea Boulevard
frontage to allow for direct pedestrian access to the adjacent transit stop, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

23. All existing overhead utilities within the public right-of-way, adjacent to the
development, and on-site shall be undergrounded. The developer shall
coordinate with all affected utility companies for their review and permitting.

24. Unused driveways shall be replaced with sidewalk, curb and gutter. Also, any
broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on all streets shall
be replaced and all off-site improvements shall be upgraded to be in compliance
with current ADA guidelines.

25. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

26. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

27. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder’s Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

Writer
Adrian Zambrano
November 22, 2024

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
Zoning Sketch Map
Aerial Sketch Map
Site Plan date stamped November 8, 2024
Elevations date stamped November 7, 2024 (3 pages)




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024

Rendering date stamped November 7, 2024




MERCER LN




55TH ST
RE-35 LEITH L
N
RH *
SAHUARO DR RE-35 CLINTON ST
Z-370-84




54TH ST 56TH ST

RE-35
SHEA BLVD

R-O * RE-43
Z-43-22 Z-30-98



CANNON DR


COCHISE
R1-10 *
55TH PL
Z-128-89

57TH ST
RE-43
58TH ST
ALAN LN RD
PAD
RE-35
54TH PL R1-10*
Z-61-17

RE-35
BERYL AVE




¯ Miles
DEER VALLEY DR
SR 101
UNION HILLS DR
BELL RD
GREENWAY RD
Z-119-24-2

0 0.04 0.07 0.14
THUNDERBIRD RD
CACTUS RD
PARADISE VALLEY VILLAGE SHEA BLVD




SCOTTSDALE RD
COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
16TH ST 40TH ST

24TH ST TATUM BLVD

32ND ST 56TH ST
64TH ST

REQUESTED CHANGE:
APPLICANT'S NAME: Withey Morris Baugh, PLC
FROM: RE-43 ( 2.59 ac.)
DATE:
8/28/2024
APPLICATION NO: Z-119-24-2 REVISION DATES:

GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
ZONING MAP TO:
C-O/G-O ( 2.59 ac.)
2.59 Acres QS 28-41 K-11
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D OPTION
RE-43 2 N/A
C-O/G-O N/A N/A
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus 287
Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2024\Z-119-24.aprx
MERCER LN




55TH ST
RE-35 LEITH L
N
RH *
SAHUARO DR RE-35 CLINTON ST
Z-370-84




54TH ST 56TH ST

RE-35
SHEA BLVD

R-O * RE-43
Z-43-22 Z-30-98



CANNON DR


COCHISE
R1-10 *
55TH PL
Z-128-89

57TH ST
RE-43
58TH ST
ALAN LN RD
PAD
RE-35
54TH PL R1-10*
Z-61-17

RE-35
BERYL AVE




¯ Miles
DEER VALLEY DR
SR 101
UNION HILLS DR
BELL RD
GREENWAY RD
Z-119-24-2

0 0.04 0.07 0.14
THUNDERBIRD RD
CACTUS RD
PARADISE VALLEY VILLAGE SHEA BLVD




SCOTTSDALE RD
COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
16TH ST 40TH ST

24TH ST TATUM BLVD

32ND ST 56TH ST
64TH ST

REQUESTED CHANGE:
APPLICANT'S NAME: Withey Morris Baugh, PLC
FROM: RE-43 ( 2.59 ac.)
DATE:
8/28/2024
APPLICATION NO: Z-119-24-2 REVISION DATES:

GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
ZONING MAP TO:
C-O/G-O ( 2.59 ac.)
2.59 Acres QS 28-41 K-11
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D OPTION
RE-43 2 N/A
C-O/G-O N/A N/A
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus 288
Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2024\Z-119-24.aprx
„F‰)Ɛ{XcƐck‰)„ šFFcF‰¥Ɛa{
‡ $&&(66727+(6,7(0867%()520$1
(&$&7865'
$57(5,$/675((7 (6+($%/9'
     &$ 
‡ $//1(:255(/2&$7('(/(&75,&/,1(6
5':<(607 5 6,'(67%.
N92560$//(5&20081,&$7,216$1'
&$%/(7(/,9,6,21$1'$//2135(0,6( 17+67 17+67
:,5,1*6+28/'%(3/$&('81'(5*5281'
) „B) Xš%   ,1$//'(9(/230(176:+(5(9,6,%/()520 6+($%/9'
5: 5  
  352-(&7
675((7625$'-2,1,1*3523(57,(6
/2&$7,21
6,'(67%.  $,,%
(;,67,1*%866723 ‡ )8785(:,'7+/,1(6$5(+(5(
(;&$7&+ )2& 72 &/
5(7$,1%8667233$'21 (67$%/,6+('$1'6+$//$33/<727+26(
%$6,1 ($67%281'6+($%/9'
3523(57< /,1(
35,0$5<(175<(;,7
1ƒ : 675((76'(6,*1$7('$1'6+2:1217+(
17$780%/9'
(6+($%/9'
 675((7&/$6,),&$7,210$37+()8785(
 30(',$1     :,'7+/,1(66+$//%((67$%/,6+('62 '28%/(75((5$1&+5'
5(675,&7(''5,9(:$<
38( 38( 7+$721(+$/)2)7+(',67$1&(6+2:1
  217+(675((7&/$6,),&$7,210$36+$//
%(21($&+6,'(2)7+(&(17(5/,1(2) kœc)
7+(25,*,1$/5,*+72):$<
5':< (607 (;,67,1*),5(  $
+<'5$17  6+($+2/',1*6//&
‡ )520$1'$)7(57+((67$%/,6+0(172) (*5((1:$<5'67(
$1<)8785(:,'7+/,1($63529,'(' 6&2776'$/($=
+(5(,1$//<$5'6%<7+,625',1$1&(  
  6:  ;  6+$//%(0($685(')5206$,')8785(
 ;  (,'7+/,1(,1/,(82)7+()5217256,'(
9,6,%,/,7< %)„F:c
9,6,%,/,7< /,1(2)7+(/27$627+(5:,6(5(48,5('
    75,$1*/(
75,$1*/( $1':+(5(12<$5',65(48,5('81'(5 '5(:(77:25.6$5&+,7(&785(
7+(7(5062)7+,625',1$1&(12 (67(7621'568,7(
)517 67%. %8,/',1*66+$//%((5(&7('25029(' 6&2776'$/($=
1($5(5727+()5217256,'(/,1(2)$1<  
/277+$16$,')8785(:,'7+/,1(
 25'12*
{kI)‰Ɛc‰Fš)


  352326('352-(&7&216,6762)21(
  ‰88FƐck‰)„ 6725<$1'21(6725<2)),&(%8,/',1*6
)2& 72 &/ 6: 
7+(,17(17,6723529,'($+,*+(1'0(',&$/
 '(9(/230(176+$//&203/<:,7+ 2)),&(:,7+/8;85<63$&(6$1'0$7(5,$/6
 67,38/$7,2162)3(1',1*5(=21,1*
&$6($33/,&$7,21 X):XƐ%)„F{‰Fkc
  ,17(56(&7,215,*+72):$<
(;&$7&+  '(',&$7,21$1'52$':$<'(6,*1
%$6,1 $3257,212)&28175<&/8%$&5(6
6+$//&203/<:,7+7+(&,7<2)
      5(&25'(',1%22.3$*(2)7+(
3+2(1,;)/$5(',17(56(&7,21'(6,*1
 2)),&,$/5(&25'62)0$5,&23$&2817<
*8,/',1(6
   /2&$7(',16(&7,2172:16+,31257+
 ,03529(0(17672,1&/8'(3$9,1*
$1'5$1*(($672)7+(*,/$$1'6$/75,9(5
&85%*877(5&85%5$036 
%$6($1'0(5,',$10$5,&23$&2817<
 '(7$&+('6,'(:$/.$1'27+(5
$63+$/7 $5,=21$'(6&5,%('$6)2//2:6
aFcƐck‰B  ,1&,'(17$/6$/21*17+676+$//%(
  3$5.,1* 3529,'('
6) 0$1(89(5,1* %(*,11,1*$77+(1257+:(67&251(52)
 $0,1,080 2)727$/3$9(0(176+$//
$5($  6$,'6(&7,217+(1&(6287+'(*5((6
%(3529,'('$/21*17+67)257+(
  
0,187(66(&21'6($67$/21*7+(1257+
  )8///(1*7+2)7+(6,7()5217$*(
6: $ /,1(2)6$,'6(&7,21$',67$1&(2)
$'(48$7(75$16,7,216$1')8//'(37+
6: )((77+(1&(6287+'(*5((60,187(6
 $63+$/77$3(56727+($'-2,1,1*
352326('))  52 :(67$',67$1&(2)¶ 727+(
52$':$<6+$//%(3529,'('
  352326('  6287+($67&251(52)/272)6$,'
(0(5*(1&<$&&(663(50,7 1257+)'& 1(:&+85&+2)3+2(1,; &28175<&/8%$&5(67+(1&(1257+
  81'(56(3(5$7(3(50,7  )520  '(*5((60,187(66(&21'6:(67$
(;,67,1*)+ (6+($%/9'
8F)Ɛ„{FcUX)„ ',67$1&(2))((772$32,17217+(
5:5 
6&2776'$/($= :(67/,1(2)6$,'6(&7,217+(1&(1257+
3+2(1,;),5(&2'( $/21*7+(:(67/,1(2)6$,'6(&7,21$
 ',67$1&(2))((7727+(32,172)
‡ $8720$7,&),5(635,1./(56<67(0 %(*,11,1*
726,7(:$// 
%,&<&/( 5(48,5('9,$6(3(5$7(68%0,77$/
  6: 3$5.,1* 
‡ 81'(5*5281'),5(/,1(5(48,5('9,$ '(6&5,%('3$5&(/&217$,1,1*$&5(6
6(3(5$7(68%0,77$/
„F‰)Ɛ{XcƐck‰)„
522)  
{k{k„)%Ɛ%)„F:cƐ%‰  '(9(/230(17$1'86(2)7+,66,7(:,//
29(5+$1*
 ;  &21)250:,7+$//$33/,&$%/(&2'(6
$%29(
9,6,%,/,7< 6287+ 3$5.,1*/(9(/ 6) $1'25',1$1&(6
75,$1*/(   6287+ 0$,1/(9(/ 6)  $//1(:255(/2&$7('87,/,7,(6:,//
6287+ 833(5/(9(/ 6) %(3/$&('81'(5*5281'
                 6)  $1</,*+7,1*:,//%(3/$&('62$672
',5(&7/,*+7$:$<)520$'-$&(17
1257+ 0$,1/(9(/ 6) 5(6,'(17,$/',675,&76$1':,//127
(;&(('21()227&$1'/($77+(
3523(57</,1( 727$/ 6) 3523(57</,1(1212,6(2'2525
$63+$/7 ),5(758&.$&&(66 9,%5$7,21:,//%((0,77('$7$1</(9(/
3$5.,1* 5287( (;&((',1*7+(*(1(5$//(9(/2)
  3523(57</,1( /276,=(6)
1ƒ ( 0$1(89(5,1* ,16,'(5$',86  12,6(2'25259,%5$7,21(0,77('%<
$5($ 3('&21&:.:< /27&29(5$*( 
&(17(55$',86  352326('6)  86(6,17+($5($2876,'(2)7+(6,7(
2876,'(5$',86   7<3  7<3 1ƒ (
 2:1(5 62)3523(57<$'-$&(1772
 $//2:('6) 
38%/,&5,*+762):$<:,//+$9(7+(
cƐĂƌ‰BƐ„‰
 5(63216,%,/,7<)250$,17$,1,1*$//
            {k{k„)%Ɛ{UFc:Ɛ%‰ /$1'6&$3,1*/2&$7(':,7+7+(
  7<3 5,*+762):$<,1$&&25'$1&(:,7+
ŐǑċŁƆƐcƐĂƌ‰BƐ„‰
 ;  0$,1/(9(/3$5.,1* 67$//6 $33529('3/$16
9,6,%,/,7< /2:(5/(9(/3$5.,1* 67$//6  $//522)723(48,30(17$1'6$7(//,7(
75,$1*/(    
522) ',6+(66+$//%(6&5((1('727+(
29(5+$1* 67$1'$5'3$5.,1* ;  +(,*+72)7+(7$//(67(48,30(17
$%29(  $//6(59,&($5($66+$//%(6&5((1('
    &23&2'(& 72&21&($/75$6+&217$,1(56
0('2)),&(3$5.,1* 67$//3(56) /2$',1*'2&.675$16)250(56
352326('   %$&.)/2:35(9(17(56$1'27+(5
6287+)'& 0(&+$1,&$/25(/(&75,&$/(48,30(17
   
 )520 5(48,5('3$5.,1* 67$//6 )520(<(/(9(/$'-$&(1772$//
(;,67,1*)+ 3529,'('3$5.,1* 67$//6 38%/,&675((76
%$5%('5$=2525&21&(57,1$:,5(
{%F„)ƐšXX)¥Ɛ¬ƐíĂƞĂƗ
Ăƌ‰BƐ¼Ɛ„B)
      $&&(66,%/(3$5.,1* ; : $,6/( 6+$//127%(86('217+,66,7(:+(5(
.,9$6'(93$3346




9,6,%/()52038%/,&675((7625
aFcƐ„kމB &23&2'(*&7$%/( $'-$&(175(6,'(17,$/$5($6
7267$//6$&&(66,%/(67$//6  $//6,*1$*(5(48,5(66(3$5$7(
     
6) 5(9,(:6$33529$/6$1'3(50,7612
  $63+$/7 $63+$/7 5(48,5('3$5.,1* 67$//6 6,*16$5($33529('3(57+,63/$1
%)œ)‰‰ƐƐœkU„Ɛ
åķ±ĞĮƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐ{Xc„Ä%)œ)‰‰œkU„ũka
3$5.,1* 3$5.,1* % 3529,'('3$5.,1* 67$//6
 0$1(89(5,1*   0$1(89(5,1*  ,&216(17727+(5(352'8&7,212)7+,66,7( ŤĚŇĻåƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐíƐĂƐĂƐĝ ƗƐƆƐƗƐĝ ŁƐƗƐíƐí

352326('))  $5($ $5($ 5( 3/$13529,'('7+$7,)02',),&$7,216$5( ƆƐŐƐċƐċƐƐ)ũƐƐ„‰)‰„kcƐƐ%Ɛũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũ„ŽF‰)ƐƐƞƐǑƐċ
0$'(7+(352)(66,21$/6:+20$.(68&+
„ƐƐkƐ‰Ɛ‰Ɛ„Ɛ%ƐƐXƐ)ƐƐƐØƐƐƐ¬ƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐíƐĂƐƞƐĂƐŐ
(0(5*(1&<$&&(663(50,7 5$26$1726+35$1((7$ &+$1*(6$6680()8//5(63216,%,/,7<$1'
    œƐœƐœƐƐƐũƐƐƐ%ƐƐ)ƐœƐ)Ɛ‰Ɛ‰ƐœƐkƐƐUƐ„ƐƐƐũƐƐƐƐkƐa
81'(56(3(5$7(3(50,7   /,$%,/,7<)257+(02',),(' 3257,2162)7+(
17+67 3/$1
3$5$',6(9$//(<$=
     
ƞƗĝǑċ
     

    Ăű£ĂűƐ{{kšXƐk{Ɛ„‰a{Ɛ) &3'5(:(775$
 
[[[[
6: 5 21
   
)2 7,
{cƐ¼ƐX):XƐ%%)„„ 7 8&
12 75
 1 6

17+67
&2
  
3$5$',6(9$//(<$=

72/2:(5/(9(/3$5.,1* „F‰)ƐFc8ka‰Fkc
   
3$5.,1*67$//6
  
1(7$5($6) $&5(6 )¬kcFc:
5($5 67%. *5266$5($6) $&5(6 ĞžžƣåƐüŇŹ
 
  ǑƆĝƞƗĝƞǑƞċ
   ĞžžƣåƐÚ±ƒå
¬kcFc:Ɛ)}ŽF)a)c‰„
/1'6&3 67%.
&855(17=21,1* 5(
CITY OF PHOENIX 352326('5(=21,1* &2
726,7(:$// 
3523(57< /,1( /27&29(5$*( 5(48,5('
352326('
6 ƒ ( NOV 08 2024 6)
  
6(7%$&.6 ck
5( 5( )5217  
Planning & Development 6,'(  
&21*5*$7,21%(7+,65$(/ (/,7(+2/',1*6//& 5($5  
„F‰)Ɛ{Xc 2)3+2(1,;$5,=21$ Department
  17+67 %8,/',1*+(,*+7  
)2& 72 &/     1257+ 17+67 3$5$',6(9$//(<$=
   3$5$',6(9$//(<$=
'
šFFcF‰¥Ɛa{
a‰)FXƐX):)c%
(&$&7865'
0(&+3$1(/


*/$66 17+67 17+67

0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 6+($%/9'
352-(&7
  75$6/8&(17*/$663$1(/
/2&$7,21

67((/ 17$780%/9'
 /(9(/
  
9(1((50$7(5$/ '28%/(75((5$1&+5'


$5&+,7(&785$/&21&5(7(
 /(9(/)) kœc)

 6+($+2/',1*6//&
/2:(5/(9(/3$5.,1* (*5((1:$<5'67(
6&2776'$/($=
 /2:(5/(9(/  

CITY OF PHOENIX %)„F:c
'5(:(77:25.6$5&+,7(&785(
(67(7621'568,7(
NOV 07 2024 6&2776'$/($=
œ)„‰  

    ƞ Planning & Development {kI)‰Ɛc‰Fš)
  
Department 352326('352-(&7&216,6762)21(
6725<$1'21(6725<2)),&(%8,/',1*6
7+(,17(17,6723529,'($+,*+(1'0(',&$/
2)),&(:,7+/8;85<63$&(6$1'0$7(5,$/6

X):XƐ%)„F{‰Fkc
0$;    $3257,212)&28175<&/8%$&5(6
 5(&25'(',1%22.3$*(2)7+(
 2)),&,$/5(&25'62)0$5,&23$&2817<
/2&$7(',16(&7,2172:16+,31257+
0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 $1'5$1*(($672)7+(*,/$$1'6$/75,9(5
  %$6($1'0(5,',$10$5,&23$&2817<
$5,=21$'(6&5,%('$6)2//2:6

%(*,11,1*$77+(1257+:(67&251(52)
6$,'6(&7,217+(1&(6287+'(*5((6
 /(9(/ 0,187(66(&21'6($67$/21*7+(1257+
   9(57,&$/&+$1*(6,1/(9(/6 %(9(/('&+$1*(6,1/(9(/6 /,1(2)6$,'6(&7,21$',67$1&(2)
)((77+(1&(6287+'(*5((60,187(6
:(67$',67$1&(2)¶ 727+(
6287+($67&251(52)/272)6$,'
 /(9(/)) &28175<&/8%$&5(67+(1&(1257+
 '(*5((60,187(66(&21'6:(67$
‰¥{ũƐ„F‰)ƐœXXƐ%)‰FX ',67$1&(2))((772$32,17217+(
/2:(5/(9(/3$5.,1* :(67/,1(2)6$,'6(&7,217+(1&(1257+
$/21*7+(:(67/,1(2)6$,'6(&7,21$
 /2:(5/(9(/

ƌ    ',67$1&(2))((7727+(32,172)
%(*,11,1*

'(6&5,%('3$5&(/&217$,1,1*$&5(6

)X)š‰FkcƐck‰)„
)„‰ 0$6215<&$3250257$5  0$*21(&2$7678&&2&203/,$1&(
352*5$0$//21(&2$7678&&2
    ċ 6<67(066+$//%($33/,('%<0)5
   $33529(',167$//(56$1$33529('
:($7+(55(6,67,9(%$55,(56+$//%(
$33/,('29(5$//)5$0,1*$1':22'
%$6('6+($7+,1*21(&2$7678&&2
678&&2),1,6+ 6<67(0 ,&&(65 7+,621(&2$7
678&&26<67(06+$//%($33/,('
29(5$:($7+(55(6,67,9(%$55,(5
+25,=217$/5(%$5:,7+,1 9$5,(6 &21)250,1*72,5&5
%/2&.&(// ,)$33/,&$%/(  3529,'(:($7+(5)/$6+,1*3522),1*
/2&$7('$7 +(,*+7 $7(;7(5,25:$//3(1(75$7,216
,1&/8',1*:,1'2:6'2256$1'
9(1763(55
5(,1)25&('&08:$//
 3$,17$//87,/,7$5,$10(7$/720$7&+
0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 678&&2812
9(57,&$/5(%$5
   :((36&5(('72%(,167$//('3(5,5&
&(17(5(',1:$// 5
ŐǑċŁƆƐcƐĂƌ‰BƐ„‰
),1,6+*5$'(  678&&23/$67(5),1,6+0$7(5,$/72
%(,167$//('3(5,5&5
(;7(5,25),1,6+6<67(07%' 
 /(9(/ 0,1 /$3
  



 /(9(/))

&21&5(7()227,1* {%F„)ƐšXX)¥Ɛ¬ƐíĂƞĂƗ
129(57,&$/
Ăƌ‰BƐ¼Ɛ„B)
3(5
'2:(/6:,7+
.,9$6'(93$3346




 /2:(5/(9(/
 $/7(51$7(%(1'6 6758&785$/


%)œ)‰‰ƐƐœkU„Ɛ
3(56758&785$/ åķ±ĞĮƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐ{Xc„Ä%)œ)‰‰œkU„ũka

ŤĚŇĻåƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐíƐĂƐĂƐĝ ƗƐƆƐƗƐĝ ŁƐƗƐíƐí
ck‰B ƆƐŐƐċƐċƐƐ)ũƐƐ„‰)‰„kcƐƐ%Ɛũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũ„ŽF‰)ƐƐƞƐǑƐċ

    Ɨ ‰¥{ũƐ„F‰)ƐœXXƐ%)‰FX „ƐƐkƐ‰Ɛ‰Ɛ„Ɛ%ƐƐXƐ)ƐƐƐØƐƐƐ¬ƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐíƐĂƐƞƐĂƐŐ
   œƐœƐœƐƐƐũƐƐƐ%ƐƐ)ƐœƐ)Ɛ‰Ɛ‰ƐœƐkƐƐUƐ„ƐƐƐũƐƐƐƐkƐa
Ă   
ƞƗĝǑċ

Ăű£ĂűƐ{{kšXƐk{Ɛ„‰a{Ɛ)
5 21
)2 7,
{cƐ¼ƐX):XƐ%%)„„ 7 8&
12 75
 1 6
0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 
  &2
17+67
3$5$',6(9$//(<$=


 /(9(/
„F‰)ƐFc8ka‰Fkc
  
1(7$5($6) $&5(6 )¬kcFc:
*5266$5($6) $&5(6 ĞžžƣåƐüŇŹ

ǑƆĝƞƗĝƞǑƞċ
ĞžžƣåƐÚ±ƒå
 /(9(/)) ¬kcFc:Ɛ)}ŽF)a)c‰„

&855(17=21,1* 5(
/2:(5/(9(/3$5.,1* 352326('5(=21,1* &2

 /2:(5/(9(/ /27&29(5$*( 5(48,5('
 352326('
6)

6(7%$&.6 ck
)5217  
6,'(  
„kމB 5($5  

%8,/',1*+(,*+7  
    Ő    '
šFFcF‰¥Ɛa{
a‰)FXƐX):)c%
(&$&7865'
0(&+3$1(/


*/$66 17+67 17+67

352-(&7 6+($%/9'
75$6/8&(17*/$663$1(/
/2&$7,21
0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 0$;%8,/'+(,*+7
  67((/ 17$780%/9'


9(1((50$7(5$/ '28%/(75((5$1&+5'


$5&+,7(&785$/&21&5(7(
 /(9(/
kœc)
  
 6+($+2/',1*6//&
(*5((1:$<5'67(
6&2776'$/($=
 

%)„F:c
 /(9(/))
 '5(:(77:25.6$5&+,7(&785(
(67(7621'568,7(
6&2776'$/($=
 
)„‰Ɛ)cX:)%ƐŦck‰BƐŽFX%Fc:ŧ {kI)‰Ɛc‰Fš)
   
Ő    352326('352-(&7&216,6762)21(
6725<$1'21(6725<2)),&(%8,/',1*6
7+(,17(17,6723529,'($+,*+(1'0(',&$/
2)),&(:,7+/8;85<63$&(6$1'0$7(5,$/6

X):XƐ%)„F{‰Fkc
$3257,212)&28175<&/8%$&5(6
5(&25'(',1%22.3$*(2)7+(
2)),&,$/5(&25'62)0$5,&23$&2817<
0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 /2&$7(',16(&7,2172:16+,31257+
  $1'5$1*(($672)7+(*,/$$1'6$/75,9(5
%$6($1'0(5,',$10$5,&23$&2817<
$5,=21$'(6&5,%('$6)2//2:6

%(*,11,1*$77+(1257+:(67&251(52)
6$,'6(&7,217+(1&(6287+'(*5((6
0,187(66(&21'6($67$/21*7+(1257+
 /(9(/ /,1(2)6$,'6(&7,21$',67$1&(2)
   )((77+(1&(6287+'(*5((60,187(6
:(67$',67$1&(2)¶ 727+(
6287+($67&251(52)/272)6$,'
&28175<&/8%$&5(67+(1&(1257+
'(*5((60,187(66(&21'6:(67$
',67$1&(2))((772$32,17217+(
 /(9(/)) :(67/,1(2)6$,'6(&7,217+(1&(1257+
 $/21*7+(:(67/,1(2)6$,'6(&7,21$
',67$1&(2))((7727+(32,172)
%(*,11,1*

'(6&5,%('3$5&(/&217$,1,1*$&5(6


ck‰BƐ)cX:)%ƐŦck‰BƐŽFX%Fc:ŧ )X)š‰FkcƐck‰)„
 0$*21(&2$7678&&2&203/,$1&(
    ƞ    352*5$0$//21(&2$7678&&2
6<67(066+$//%($33/,('%<0)5
$33529(',167$//(56$1$33529('
:($7+(55(6,67,9(%$55,(56+$//%(
$33/,('29(5$//)5$0,1*$1':22'
%$6('6+($7+,1*21(&2$7678&&2
6<67(0 ,&&(65 7+,621(&2$7
678&&26<67(06+$//%($33/,('
29(5$:($7+(55(6,67,9(%$55,(5
&21)250,1*72,5&5
0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 0$;%8,/'+(,*+7  3529,'(:($7+(5)/$6+,1*3522),1*
  $7(;7(5,25:$//3(1(75$7,216
,1&/8',1*:,1'2:6'2256$1'
9(1763(55
 3$,17$//87,/,7$5,$10(7$/720$7&+
678&&2812
 :((36&5(('72%(,167$//('3(5,5&
5
ŐǑċŁƆƐcƐĂƌ‰BƐ„‰
 /(9(/  678&&23/$67(5),1,6+0$7(5,$/72
   %(,167$//('3(5,5&5




 /(9(/))
 {%F„)ƐšXX)¥Ɛ¬ƐíĂƞĂƗ
Ăƌ‰BƐ¼Ɛ„B)
.,9$6'(93$3346




„kމBƐ)cX:)%ƐŦck‰BƐŽFX%Fc:ŧ %)œ)‰‰ƐƐœkU„Ɛ
åķ±ĞĮƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐ{Xc„Ä%)œ)‰‰œkU„ũka

ŤĚŇĻåƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐíƐĂƐĂƐĝ ƗƐƆƐƗƐĝ ŁƐƗƐíƐí
   
Ɨ   
ƆƐŐƐċƐċƐƐ)ũƐƐ„‰)‰„kcƐƐ%Ɛũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũ„ŽF‰)ƐƐƞƐǑƐċ

„ƐƐkƐ‰Ɛ‰Ɛ„Ɛ%ƐƐXƐ)ƐƐƐØƐƐƐ¬ƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐíƐĂƐƞƐĂƐŐ

œƐœƐœƐƐƐũƐƐƐ%ƐƐ)ƐœƐ)Ɛ‰Ɛ‰ƐœƐkƐƐUƐ„ƐƐƐũƐƐƐƐkƐa



0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 0$;%8,/'+(,*+7
  ƞƗĝǑċ

Ăű£ĂűƐ{{kšXƐk{Ɛ„‰a{Ɛ)
5 21
 /(9(/ )2 7,
  {cƐ¼ƐX):XƐ%%)„„ 7 8&
 12 75
 1 6

17+67
&2
3$5$',6(9$//(<$=

 /(9(/)) „F‰)ƐFc8ka‰Fkc

1(7$5($6) $&5(6 )¬kcFc:
*5266$5($6) $&5(6 ĞžžƣåƐüŇŹ

ǑƆĝƞƗĝƞǑƞċ
ĞžžƣåƐÚ±ƒå
¬kcFc:Ɛ)}ŽF)a)c‰„
œ)„‰Ɛ)cX:)%ƐŦck‰BƐŽFX%Fc:ŧ CITY OF PHOENIX &855(17=21,1* 5(
352326('5(=21,1* &2
    ċ    /27&29(5$*( 5(48,5('
NOV 07 2024 352326('
6)

Planning & Development 6(7%$&.6 ck
)5217  
6,'(  
Department 5($5  

%8,/',1*+(,*+7   '
šFFcF‰¥Ɛa{
a‰)FXƐX):)c%
(&$&7865'
0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 0$;%8,/'+(,*+7
  0(&+3$1(/


*/$66 17+67 17+67

352-(&7 6+($%/9'
75$6/8&(17*/$663$1(/
/2&$7,21
 /(9(/
  
67((/ 17$780%/9'


9(1((50$7(5$/ '28%/(75((5$1&+5'

 /(9(/)) $5&+,7(&785$/&21&5(7(
 kœc)
 6+($+2/',1*6//&
(*5((1:$<5'67(
/2:(5/(9(/3$5.,1* 6&2776'$/($=
 
 /2:(5/(9(/ %)„F:c

'5(:(77:25.6$5&+,7(&785(
(67(7621'568,7(
6&2776'$/($=
)„‰ƐƐ)cX:)%ƐŦ„kމBƐŽFX%Fc:ŧ  

{kI)‰Ɛc‰Fš)
    Ő   
352326('352-(&7&216,6762)21(
6725<$1'21(6725<2)),&(%8,/',1*6
7+(,17(17,6723529,'($+,*+(1'0(',&$/
2)),&(:,7+/8;85<63$&(6$1'0$7(5,$/6


0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 0$;%8,/'+(,*+7
X):XƐ%)„F{‰Fkc
 
$3257,212)&28175<&/8%$&5(6
5(&25'(',1%22.3$*(2)7+(
2)),&,$/5(&25'62)0$5,&23$&2817<
/2&$7(',16(&7,2172:16+,31257+
$1'5$1*(($672)7+(*,/$$1'6$/75,9(5
%$6($1'0(5,',$10$5,&23$&2817<
$5,=21$'(6&5,%('$6)2//2:6
 /(9(/
  
%(*,11,1*$77+(1257+:(67&251(52)
6$,'6(&7,217+(1&(6287+'(*5((6
0,187(66(&21'6($67$/21*7+(1257+
/,1(2)6$,'6(&7,21$',67$1&(2)
)((77+(1&(6287+'(*5((60,187(6
:(67$',67$1&(2)¶ 727+(
 /(9(/)) 6287+($67&251(52)/272)6$,'
 &28175<&/8%$&5(67+(1&(1257+
'(*5((60,187(66(&21'6:(67$
',67$1&(2))((772$32,17217+(
:(67/,1(2)6$,'6(&7,217+(1&(1257+
/2:(5/(9(/3$5.,1*
$/21*7+(:(67/,1(2)6$,'6(&7,21$
',67$1&(2))((7727+(32,172)
%(*,11,1*
 /2:(5/(9(/

'(6&5,%('3$5&(/&217$,1,1*$&5(6

)X)š‰FkcƐck‰)„
 0$*21(&2$7678&&2&203/,$1&(
ck‰BƐƐ)cX:)%ƐŦ„kމBƐŽFX%Fc:ŧ 352*5$0$//21(&2$7678&&2
6<67(066+$//%($33/,('%<0)5
    ƞ $33529(',167$//(56$1$33529('
   :($7+(55(6,67,9(%$55,(56+$//%(
$33/,('29(5$//)5$0,1*$1':22'
%$6('6+($7+,1*21(&2$7678&&2
6<67(0 ,&&(65 7+,621(&2$7
678&&26<67(06+$//%($33/,('
29(5$:($7+(55(6,67,9(%$55,(5
0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 &21)250,1*72,5&5
   3529,'(:($7+(5)/$6+,1*3522),1*
$7(;7(5,25:$//3(1(75$7,216
,1&/8',1*:,1'2:6'2256$1'
9(1763(55
 3$,17$//87,/,7$5,$10(7$/720$7&+
678&&2812
 :((36&5(('72%(,167$//('3(5,5&
 /(9(/ 5
ŐǑċŁƆƐcƐĂƌ‰BƐ„‰
    678&&23/$67(5),1,6+0$7(5,$/72
%(,167$//('3(5,5&5




 /(9(/))




/2:(5/(9(/3$5.,1*
{%F„)ƐšXX)¥Ɛ¬ƐíĂƞĂƗ
Ăƌ‰BƐ¼Ɛ„B)
.,9$6'(93$3346




 /2:(5/(9(/

%)œ)‰‰ƐƐœkU„Ɛ
åķ±ĞĮƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐ{Xc„Ä%)œ)‰‰œkU„ũka

ŤĚŇĻåƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐíƐĂƐĂƐĝ ƗƐƆƐƗƐĝ ŁƐƗƐíƐí

„kމBƐƐ)cX:)%ƐŦ„kމBƐŽFX%Fc:ŧ ƆƐŐƐċƐċƐƐ)ũƐƐ„‰)‰„kcƐƐ%Ɛũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũ„ŽF‰)ƐƐƞƐǑƐċ

„ƐƐkƐ‰Ɛ‰Ɛ„Ɛ%ƐƐXƐ)ƐƐƐØƐƐƐ¬ƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐíƐĂƐƞƐĂƐŐ

œƐœƐœƐƐƐũƐƐƐ%ƐƐ)ƐœƐ)Ɛ‰Ɛ‰ƐœƐkƐƐUƐ„ƐƐƐũƐƐƐƐkƐa
    Ɨ   

ƞƗĝǑċ
0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 0$;%8,/'+(,*+7
  Ăű£ĂűƐ{{kšXƐk{Ɛ„‰a{Ɛ)
5 21
)2 7,
{cƐ¼ƐX):XƐ%%)„„ 7 8&
12 75
 1 6

 /(9(/ 17+67
&2
   3$5$',6(9$//(<$=

„F‰)ƐFc8ka‰Fkc
1(7$5($6) $&5(6 )¬kcFc:
*5266$5($6) $&5(6 ĞžžƣåƐüŇŹ
 /(9(/)) ǑƆĝƞƗĝƞǑƞċ
 ĞžžƣåƐÚ±ƒå
¬kcFc:Ɛ)}ŽF)a)c‰„
&855(17=21,1* 5(
/2:(5/(9(/3$5.,1* 352326('5(=21,1* &2
CITY OF PHOENIX
/27&29(5$*( 5(48,5('
 /2:(5/(9(/ 352326('
 6)
NOV 07 2024
6(7%$&.6 ck
)5217  
Planning & Development 6,'(  
œ)„‰Ɛ)cX:)%ƐŦ„kމBƐŽFX%Fc:ŧ 5($5  
Department %8,/',1*+(,*+7  
   
ċ   
'
šFFcF‰¥Ɛa{
(&$&7865'



17+67 17+67

352-(&7 6+($%/9'
/2&$7,21


17$780%/9'


'28%/(75((5$1&+5'


kœc)
 6+($+2/',1*6//&
(*5((1:$<5'67(
6&2776'$/($=
 

%)„F:c
'5(:(77:25.6$5&+,7(&785(
(67(7621'568,7(
6&2776'$/($=
 

{kI)‰Ɛc‰Fš)
352326('352-(&7&216,6762)21(
6725<$1'21(6725<2)),&(%8,/',1*6
7+(,17(17,6723529,'($+,*+(1'0(',&$/
2)),&(:,7+/8;85<63$&(6$1'0$7(5,$/6

X):XƐ%)„F{‰Fkc
$3257,212)&28175<&/8%$&5(6
5(&25'(',1%22.3$*(2)7+(
2)),&,$/5(&25'62)0$5,&23$&2817<
/2&$7(',16(&7,2172:16+,31257+
$1'5$1*(($672)7+(*,/$$1'6$/75,9(5
%$6($1'0(5,',$10$5,&23$&2817<
$5,=21$'(6&5,%('$6)2//2:6

%(*,11,1*$77+(1257+:(67&251(52)
6$,'6(&7,217+(1&(6287+'(*5((6
0,187(66(&21'6($67$/21*7+(1257+
/,1(2)6$,'6(&7,21$',67$1&(2)
)((77+(1&(6287+'(*5((60,187(6
:(67$',67$1&(2)¶ 727+(
6287+($67&251(52)/272)6$,'
&28175<&/8%$&5(67+(1&(1257+
'(*5((60,187(66(&21'6:(67$
',67$1&(2))((772$32,17217+(
:(67/,1(2)6$,'6(&7,217+(1&(1257+
$/21*7+(:(67/,1(2)6$,'6(&7,21$
',67$1&(2))((7727+(32,172)
%(*,11,1*

'(6&5,%('3$5&(/&217$,1,1*$&5(6




ŐǑċŁƆƐcƐĂƌ‰BƐ„‰




{%F„)ƐšXX)¥Ɛ¬ƐíĂƞĂƗ
Ăƌ‰BƐ¼Ɛ„B)
.,9$6'(93$3346




%)œ)‰‰ƐƐœkU„Ɛ
åķ±ĞĮƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐ{Xc„Ä%)œ)‰‰œkU„ũka

ŤĚŇĻåƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐíƐĂƐĂƐĝ ƗƐƆƐƗƐĝ ŁƐƗƐíƐí

ƆƐŐƐċƐċƐƐ)ũƐƐ„‰)‰„kcƐƐ%Ɛũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũ„ŽF‰)ƐƐƞƐǑƐċ

„ƐƐkƐ‰Ɛ‰Ɛ„Ɛ%ƐƐXƐ)ƐƐƐØƐƐƐ¬ƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐíƐĂƐƞƐĂƐŐ

œƐœƐœƐƐƐũƐƐƐ%ƐƐ)ƐœƐ)Ɛ‰Ɛ‰ƐœƐkƐƐUƐ„ƐƐƐũƐƐƐƐkƐa




ƞƗĝǑċ


5 21
)2 7,
{cƐ¼ƐX):XƐ%%)„„ 7 8&
12 75
 1 6

17+67
&2
3$5$',6(9$//(<$=

„F‰)ƐFc8ka‰Fkc
1(7$5($6) $&5(6 )¬kcFc:
CITY OF PHOENIX *5266$5($6) $&5(6 ĞžžƣåƐüŇŹ

ǑƆĝƞƗĝƞǑƞċ
ĞžžƣåƐÚ±ƒå
¬kcFc:Ɛ)}ŽF)a)c‰„
NOV 07 2024 &855(17=21,1* 5(
352326('5(=21,1* &2
Planning & Development /27&29(5$*( 5(48,5('
352326('
Department 6)

6(7%$&.6 ck
)5217  
6,'(  
5($5  

%8,/',1*+(,*+7   '
ATTACHMENT C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-119-24-2



Date of VPC Meeting December 2, 2024
Request From RE-43
Request To C-O/G-O
Proposal Office
Location Southeast corner of 56th Street and Shea Boulevard
VPC Recommendation No quorum
VPC Vote No quorum


VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

No quorum.

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:

No quorum.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 294
ATTACHMENT D

REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
January 2, 2025

ITEM NO: 7
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:

Application #: Z-119-24-2
Location: Southeast corner of 56th Street and Shea Boulevard
From: RE-43
To: C-O/G-O
Acreage: 2.59
Proposal: Office
Applicant: Jason Morris, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC
Owner: Ronald Urman, 56 & Shea Holdings, LLC
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Paradise Valley 12/2/2024 No quorum.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the staff recommendation with two
additional stipulations.

Motion Discussion:

There was discussion amongst the commissioners regarding the appropriateness of including
two new additional stipulations, requested by the applicant, without a recommendation from the
Village Planning Committee and whether the case should be remanded back to the Village
Planning Committee.

Motion details: Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve Z-119-24-2, per the staff
recommendation, with two additional stipulations as follows:

1. The location(s) of any driveway accessing the property from 56th Street shall be per the
accepted Traffic Impact Analysis by the Street Transportation Department.

2. A traffic control device and signage shall be provided to discourage left-out turning
movements from the property on to 56th Street.

Maker: Matthews
Second: James
Vote: 6-2 (Busching, Jaramillo)
Absent: None
Opposition Present: Yes

Findings:

1. As stipulated, the proposal increases shade tree canopy coverage along public
sidewalks, bicycle parking, pedestrian pathways, and transit stops.

2. As stipulated, the proposal is compatible with adjacent land uses and zoning and
provides an increased buffer adjacent to single-family residential zoning.

3. As stipulated, the proposal supports efforts from various plans, policies, and initiatives,
including the Tree and Shade Master Plan, the Complete Streets Guiding Principles, the
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan, the Transportation Electrification Action Plan, the
Phoenix Climate Action Plan, and the Conservation Measures for New Development
policy.


Stipulations:

1. The elevations shall contain design elements of residential character, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

2. A minimum 20-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along the north property
line, adjacent to Shea Boulevard, and shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper,
large canopy, shade trees, planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, and
shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers evenly distributed throughout the
landscape area to achieve a minimum of 50% live coverage, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

3. The west 25 feet of the property, measured from the west property line adjacent to 56th
Street, shall be landscaped with minimum 2-inch caliper, large canopy, shade trees,
planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, and shrubs, accents, and
vegetative groundcovers evenly distributed throughout the landscape area to achieve a
minimum of 50% live coverage, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

4. A minimum 10-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along the south and east
property lines and shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, large canopy, shade
trees, planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, and shrubs, accents, and
vegetative groundcovers evenly distributed throughout the landscape area to achieve a
minimum of 50% live coverage, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

5. A minimum of 10% of surface parking areas (exclusive of required/stipulated landscape
setbacks) shall be landscaped. Surface parking areas shall achieve a minimum of 25%
shade with minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees, dispersed
throughout the landscape areas, as approved by Planning and Development
Department.

6. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be constructed of
decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments that
visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

7. All bicycle parking, pedestrian pathways (including sidewalks), and transit stops shall be
shaded by a structure, landscaping, or a combination of the two to provide a minimum
of 75% shade, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. Bicycle parking shall be provided per the requirements of Section 1307.H of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance and shall be provided through Inverted U and/or artistic
racks located near building entrances and installed per the requirements of Section
1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Artistic racks shall adhere to the City of
Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.

9. A minimum of 10% of the required bicycle parking spaces shall include standard
electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

10. A minimum of 5% of the required vehicle parking spaces shall include Electric Vehicle
(EV) Installed Infrastructure and a minimum of 20% of the vehicle parking spaces within
the underground parking garage shall include EV Capable spaces, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

11. A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for stormwater
management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This includes but is not limited
to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales, permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater
Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure and Low Impact Development Details for
Alternative Stormwater Management.

12. Only landscape materials listed in the Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-
Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List shall be utilized, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development Department.

13. Natural turf shall only be utilized in required retention areas (bottom of basin, and only
allowed on slopes if required for slope stabilization) and functional turf areas in common
areas, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

14. Pressure regulating sprinkler heads and drip lines shall be utilized in any turf areas to
reduce water waste.

15. Landscaping shall be maintained by permanent and automatic/water efficient
WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers (or similar smart controller) to minimize
maintenance and irrigation water consumption for all on and offsite landscape irrigation.

16. Provide a landscape irrigation plan that includes zones to establish the amount of
irrigation to apply based on maturity and type of the landscaping. Irrigation should be
applied efficiently based on the maturity and need for the vegetation.

17. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that demonstrates a
commitment to participate in the Phoenix Water Efficiency Checkup program for a
minimum of 10 years, or as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

18. The existing bus pad on eastbound Shea Boulevard, adjacent to the development, shall
be retained.

19. A minimum of 65 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for the south
half of Shea Boulevard, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

20. The streetscape beginning at the back of curb along the south side of Shea Boulevard
on both sides of the sidewalk, adjacent to the development, shall be replenished with
minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees planted 20 feet on
center, or in equivalent groupings, and shrubs, accents and vegetative groundcovers
with a maximum mature height of two feet evenly distributed throughout the landscape
area to achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

21. A minimum 6-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum 8-foot-wide
landscape strip located between the back of curb and sidewalk shall be constructed on
the east side of 56th Street, adjacent to the development, planted to the following
standards and as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees, planted 20 feet
on center or in equivalent groupings.

b. Shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers with a maximum mature height
of two feet evenly distributed throughout the landscape area to achieve a
minimum of 75% live coverage.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a pedestrian
environment.

22. An enhanced pedestrian connection shall be provided on the Shea Boulevard frontage
to allow for direct pedestrian access to the adjacent transit stop, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

23. All existing overhead utilities within the public right-of-way, adjacent to the development,
and on-site shall be undergrounded. The developer shall coordinate with all affected
utility companies for their review and permitting.

24. Unused driveways shall be replaced with sidewalk, curb and gutter. Also, any broken or
out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on all streets shall be replaced and
all off-site improvements shall be upgraded to be in compliance with current ADA
guidelines.

25. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with paving,
curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping and other
incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development Department. All
improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

26. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot radius
of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the Archaeology Office
to properly assess the materials.

27. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207 waiver of
claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County Recorder’s Office
and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application file for record.

28. THE LOCATION(S) OF ANY DRIVEWAY ACCESSING THE PROPERTY FROM 56TH
STREET SHALL BE PER THE ACCEPTED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS BY THE
STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT.

29. A TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE AND SIGNAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO
DISCOURAGE LEFT-OUT TURNING MOVEMENTS FROM THE PROPERTY ON TO
56TH STREET.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact Teleia
Galaviz at 602-291-2559, teleia.galaviz@phoenix.gov, TTY: Use 7-1-1.




ATTACHMENT E

CITY OF PHOENIX
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

FORM TO REQUEST PC to CC
I HEREBY REQUEST THAT THE CC HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON: 2/5/2025

APPLICATION NO/ Z-119-24-2 (SIGNATURE ON ORIGINAL IN FILE)
LOCATION (Southeast corner opposition X applicant
of 56th Street and
Shea
Boulevard)

APPEALED FROM: PC 01/02/2025 10210 North 57th Street
Phoenix, AZ 85253

PC DATE STREET/ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP
TO PC/CC CC 02/02/2025 Richard A. Pasquale
HEARING 480-699-5683
Littlepegasus1@gmail.com
CC DATE NAME / PHONE / EMAIL
REASON FOR REQUEST:

Seeking a single modest stipulation on signage, see attached.

RECEIVED BY: Camryn Thompson RECEIVED ON: 1/9/2025

Joshua Bednarek Camryn Thompson
Tricia Gomes Danny J. Inglese
Racelle Escolar GIS
Sarah Stockham Byron Easton (for PHO appeals only)
Adam Stranieri Village Planner
Stephanie Vasquez Applicant
Heather Klotz
Dalia Adams




REVISED 10/16/2024 vcm
ATTACHMENT F
CITY OF PHOENIX
NOV 26 2024
Planning & Development
Department




CITY OF PHOENIX
NOV 26 2024
Planning & Development
Department




CITY OF PHOENIX
NOV 26 2024
Planning & Development
Department




ATTACHMENT G

From: Carol Dries
To: Adrian G Zambrano
Cc: Carol Dries
Subject: Application No Z-119-24-2
Date: Sunday, November 24, 2024 3:00:35 PM




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.

Report Suspicious   ‌


To Adrian Zambrano and the Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee,
I do hereby protest strongly against the proposed rezoning application with the City of Phoenix
(Case No. Z-119-24-2) for the property at 56th Street and Shea.

We are current resident just 2 doors down from the proposed new project with the new
proposed zoning. I am also a full-time Realtor with Russ Lyon Sotheby’s International Realty
for the past 20 years.
There is absolutely NO QUESTION that the rezoning of this parcel and the project proposed
WILL SEVERELY HURT THE RESALE VALUE of the homes directly South of there, running along
side the whole 56th Street to Mountain View. This is especially true for the few homes that are
closest to the proposed project.

To allow the rezoning and the project to move forward would be a great injustice to us
homeowners who have bought in this area with the intent to live and see our homes appreciate
in value.
If you allow this rezoning and commercial building, then the future pricing appreciation of our
homes will stall. That is not just and fair your homeowner residents and our neighborhood and
community.
The project leaders comment that their proposed new building is already next to a church and
across the street from a school/synagogue, so it should not matter to anyone that the zoning
be changed from RE-43 to C-O.
However, they failed to point out that the entire adjoining rest of 56th Street going south is
RESIDENTIAL, and the zoning change would really matter to all of us.
I have spoken to my family and many, many of my neighbors, and we are ALL OPPOSED to the
proposed rezoning.

Please do not allow this parcel to be rezoned from RE-43 to C-O to accommodate the
development of a medical office!!! There are plenty of other commercial spaces and parcels
that would not necessitate the rezoning of RE-43.
This is my neighborhood and my home and I do NOT want a medical office 2 doors down from
me!


I cannot state this strongly enough!!

We vote NO to the rezoning and new development!
Carol and Charlie Dries

Carol Dries
REALTOR®

Russ Lyon Sotheby's International Realty
6900 E Camelback Road, Suite 110, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 [goo.gl]
(602) 618-6999 | carol.dries@russlyon.com | LinkedIn [linkedin.com] |
[russlyon.com] caroldries.com [caroldries.com]




From: ROBERT GEORGE
To: Adrian G Zambrano
Subject: Case No. Z-119-24-2
Date: Tuesday, November 26, 2024 12:32:12 PM




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.

Report Suspicious     ‌


To Mr. Zambrano and the Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee.
We are opposed to the rezoning for the property located at the Southwest Corner of
Shea Blvd. and 56th St., Phoenix (Case No. Z-119-24-2) for several reasons.

1. It will devalue our property for resale significantly according to my sources. All
properties south of Shea Blvd on 56th St except for the Jewish Synagogue are
residential thus affecting a significant number of properties currently zoned I believe
like Paradise Valley. One plus acre lots. We have lived here for 24 years and many
other residents on 56th St. have been here many years.

2. It will increase traffic on 56th Street as well as Shea Blvd. There are already a
number of accidents that occur at that intersection every year. The map provided by
the lawyers for the zoning change request indicate the entrance to the medical
building would be off of Shea Blvd east of the intersection. I am fairly certain cars
approaching from the east on Shea will make a U-turn at 56th St to get to the
entrance for the medical facility.

3. Why not use one of the vacated buildings on the north side of Shea Blvd. further to
the west of 56th St. For example, the Honorhealth facility at 50th St and Shea I
presume is vacant since they built the new Urgent Care and ER next to Mountainside
Fitness. The urgent care facility that was at Tatum and Shea near the Chase Bank
was vacated. Or how about the building where Whole Foods is vacating at Tatum and
Shea, which all have traffic signals and multiple lanes in each direction to handle
more traffic.
Please don't approve the rezoning request. Our neighborhood has already been
degraded by allowing Mountainside Fitness and the ER/UC facility to build on Shea. A
new medical facility will just make it worse and there are other options nearby.

Robert and Victoria George
10227 N 56th St, Paradise Valley




From: Doug Leventhal
To: Adrian G Zambrano
Cc: Racelle Escolar; Council District 3 PCC
Subject: Re: Z-119-24-2 Objection
Date: Monday, December 2, 2024 1:17:21 PM




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.

Report Suspicious     ‌


Hi Adrian,
I wanted to clarify one aspect of my letter of opposition that I'd like you to share
with the respective parties.
I am in no way speaking on behalf of Congregation Beth Israel or Scottsdale Country Day
School. My opposition to the project is solely as a resident of the community and the
neighborhood south of it. The views expressed are mine only and do not represent any views
of the Board of Directors of CBI or the school. I added the detail of my board seat solely to
illustrate my involvement in the community and proximity to the project.
Thank you,
Doug Leventhal

On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 9:04 AM Adrian G Zambrano
wrote:

Hi Doug,



Thank you for your email. I have saved it to the case file and have shared it with the
applicant and the Paradise Valley VPC.



Best regards,



Adrian Zambrano

Planner II - Village Planner

Phone: 602-534-6057

E-mail: adrian.zambrano@phoenix.gov

► Planning & Development Department



Planning Division, Long Range Planning

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor

Phoenix, AZ 85003


Mission: Planning, Development and Preservation for a Better Phoenix




From: Doug Leventhal
Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2024 9:19 PM
To: Adrian G Zambrano ; Racelle Escolar

Cc: Council District 3 PCC
Subject: Z-119-24-2 Objection


Hello Adrian and Racelle, I am writing to express our objection to the proposed modification to the general plan amendment to allow a non-conforming commercial use on the currently residentially zoned and planned property. As a 21-year homeowner




Hello Adrian and Racelle,



I am writing to express our objection to the proposed modification to the general plan
amendment to allow a non-conforming commercial use on the currently residentially zoned
and planned property. As a 21-year homeowner in Singletree Ranch (to the south) and a
board member of Congregation Beth Israel (CBI) (immediately to the west) of this project, I
am concerned about the proposed use on a number of levels and would ask the commission
to recommend a denial of the proposed zone change. Those objections include traffic,
incompatibility of the proposed use and pedestrian and cyclist safety. I will address each of
these separately:



Traffic: The intersection of 56th St and Shea in its current design is most likely not
configured to handle an additional commercial use that requires 160+ parking spaces. I
would ask the applicant to produce a traffic study to demonstrate the on peak and off peak
impact this use will add to this intersection. As it currently stands, when parents are
dropping off students at both the Channen Preschool and Scottsdale Country Day School


(which operates out of CBI), northbound 56th Street traffic backs up to where all the cars
cannot proceed through the intersection on one cycle. The cars invariably will also stack up
past the proposed 56th Street curb cut entrance to the proposed project creating a conflict.



Keep in mind, all westbound and southbound traffic exiting the proposed project will have
to funnel on to 56th Street since a left-out turning movement onto Shea is prohibited from
the project's Shea curb cut due to the raised median (and proximity to the intersection).



Recommendation to Mitigate Traffic: We recommend that if this project is to proceed, to
mitigate the northbound and southbound 56th Street congestion created, that the project's
access to 56th Street is eliminated all-together and all traffic is directed to use the Shea Blvd
access.



Use: The use is directly in violation of the existing zoning and General Plan. While a
General Plan amendment is not required because the property is under 10 acres, that doesn't
discredit or diminish the fact that a 2-story medical office building is inconsistent with the
neighboring churches, schools and residences. We object to the proposed zone change
because the use itself is not currently approved or allowed without this zoning action and
would incorporate an incompatible use to the surrounding area. 56th Street is a quiet street
that ends at Mountain View to the South (then heads east to Invergordon). This use does not
contribute anything to the immediate and surrounding neighborhoods, nor bring amenities or
add any value. While it's not the purview of the City process to restrict uses within
permitted zones, it is in the purview to take actions that are consistent with the voter
approved General Plan and uphold the existing residential zoning on this property.



Recommendation to Mitigate Use: We assume there is no control over what specific uses
go into the medical office subject to C-O, but would propose a condition of approval
prohibiting pain management clinics from the development due to concerns about the
proximity to children in the school at CBI as well as the students of Scottsdale Country Day
school which uses the CBI facility and the playground immediately south of the subject
property.



Pedestrian & Cyclist Safety: 56th Street is a relatively quiet residential street used daily by
many cyclist groups and pedestrian walkers and joggers. There is no dedicated bicycle lane
on 56th street south of Shea like the one that exists immediately north of Shea, so the
cyclists and joggers share the road with vehicular traffic. Congestion of the two builds at the
crosswalk with the peak times of school and CBI functions. Adding more traffic to the
intersection as a result of this use will create additional opportunities for conflict between
those users, particularly the cyclists who do not, and cannot, use the sidewalk. Additionally,
children cross 56th Street from CBI, Channen and the Scottsdale Country Day to go to the
school's playground across the street. The additional traffic generated should not be


dismissed as an additional traffic risk for visitors not expecting the medical offices to be
situated in a neighborhood setting. Again, eliminating the 56th Street access would alleviate
this concern.



This proposed use is incompatible to the surrounding neighborhood (and existing General
Plan and Zoning). It conflicts with existing community uses, creates an additional vehicular
strain on the intersection, creates a potential conflict with the adjacent school's playground
and compounds to an already unsafe condition for cyclists. Therefore, we respectfully
request that the recommendation of the Village Planning Committee be to deny this zone
change. Barring that recommendation, we request the Committee make the
recommendations mentioned above.



Respectfully submitted,



Doug (and Stephanie) Leventhal

10021 N 55th Place




Racelle Escolar

From: Anay Kapadia
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2024 9:37 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: ITEM#7, Z-119-24-2




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


Hello,

This email is being sent as I have great concerns about the massive medical office complex to be built at this
location of 56th street and Shea Blvd.

The ingress on 56th street is only one lane, there is a busy school and religious church right across the street
which already causes traffic issues in the morning and evening during busy hours. There are toddlers with
their teachers and classes that cross the street to play right next door to this project!

Now with medical offices there, this intersection south ON 56 th street is too small and I am VERY VERY
CONCERNED about this with the added traffic!

I live at the end of 56th street and there are constantly speeding cars up and down my street! I have kids that
ride their bikes like my neighbors, and I feel it would be WRONG to approve such a big complex as it currently
is planned. Besides the intersection in front of the subject property, it will increase speeding cars on my
street as well.

At the current size of the complex, this is just too many cars coming in and out and on my street and I feel this
is a safety hazard for my kids, THE KIDS THAT CROSS THE STREET AND PLAY ON THE FIELD NEXT TO THE
SUBJECT PROPERTY UNDER CONSIDERATION, and my respected neighbors whom also live here.

Please take my neighbors and mine objections seriously and scale down the size of this medical complex due
to series traffic concerns.

I approve this email and OBJECT TO THE CURRENT PLAN AS ITS CURRENT SIZE.

Anay B. Kapadia
9809 N 56th Street
Phoenix, AZ 85253
847-975-2057.


Racelle Escolar

From: azinv@aol.com
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2024 1:55 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Shea Blvd and 56th Street Planned Medical Building




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


To the Planning Commission

I am a resident in Astoria, a 10 home subdivision, located immediately south of the project. Because
of current traffic backups, Astoria already gets quite a few cars that speed thru our tiny U-shaped
subdivision trying to get back to Shea. These frustrated drivers are searching for short cuts thru the
neighborhood trying to get around the lengthy backups on Shea. With a large project at the
intersection as proposed, the back up of cars on 56th street will ruin this residential neighborhood.
Since Mountainside Fitness opened, I'm frequently unable to make a left turn (heading west) onto
Shea because the traffic is baked up as far as the eye can see.
In addition, the parents that have children at Temple Beth that make multiple trips back and forth
everyday will be negatively impacted.
Please reconsider the size and scope of this project. It should be scaled back.

Respectfully,
Louis Chacopulos
5535 E. Beryl Ave
Paradise Valley 85253




From: Matthew Karlovsky, M.D., F.A.C.S.
To: PDD Long Range Planning
Subject: Shea and 56th rezoning
Date: Sunday, December 29, 2024 10:38:42 PM




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.

Report Suspicious     ‌


Adrian and Racelle,

I live on 57th St south of Shea Blvd and was just made aware today of the rezoning attempt at
Shea/56th St, Z-119-24-2 by a neighbor. I reviewed Adrian's report from Nov 22, 2024 about
the proposed massive office building complex. We who live in this neighborhood did not
receive any notices about this project.

If you recall, there was an organized neighborhood campaign against the rezoning of the
corner property at 57th and Shea two years ago proposed by Regal American and despite
fierce objection by hundreds of neighbors, the rezoning was pushed through by Regal's firm
Whitney Morris. This large complex is now under construction. In real life now the building is
large, overbearing and does not fit the appearance of the neighborhood and negatively impacts
the landscape and will create a traffic danger. All these concerns were ignored and the
projected was approved by the city.

The new Urgent Care which is located at 52nd street and Shea has very severely impacted
traffic congestion along Shea even during non-rush hour times these past 2 years. Since extra
traffic signals were erected on Shea to assist the Urgent Care, westbound traffic now backs up
from 56th/Shea all the way back to N. 61th Place, and east bound traffic backs up halfway to
Tatum Blvd, beginning at 2pm now. It takes 3-4 cycles of the lights to get through the
intersection of Shea/56th now. The Urgent Care alone has very badly impacted the traffic
along Shea for all the hundreds of residents within 1 mile each way along Shea.

Now comes this brand-new proposal at 56th and Shea of a 2-story office complex by Ronny
Urman, a colleague of Regal American's owner, with an underground garage and surface
garage for a total of 136 parking spaces. This is maddening and will undoubtedly further
negatively impact traffic, during peak and off peak. This type of office complex is not meant
to be in Paradise Valley. Traffic congestion will be severe.

All the proposed verbiage about bike paths, tree conservation, zero waste, climate action is the
typical blather used by Whitney Morris to plump up the application to make it appear
thoughtful and that it would somehow benefit the community by making it "fit in" to the
landscape. This can't be further from the truth.

I invite you to stand on the corner of 56th St and Shea at 3pm and observe the traffic for 30
minutes. There is no place for this new proposal.



Please do not approve this.

Sincerely,

Matthew E. Karlovsky, M.D., F.A.C.S.




----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Adrian G Zambrano
To: Matthew Karlovsky, M.D., F.A.C.S.
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2024 at 07:34:42 AM GMT+2
Subject: Automatic reply: Shea and 56th rezoning


Hello,



City offices will close at 12:00 PM on December 24 in observance of the Christmas Eve holiday and will
be closed on December 25 and January 1 in ovbservance of the Christmas Day holiday and New Year's
Day holiday. I will be out of office until Friday, January 3 and will return to office on Monday, January 6. If
you need immediate assistance, please email pdd.longrange@phoenix.gov. Otherwise, I will respond to
your email upon my return on Monday, January 6.



Thank you,

Adrian Zambrano, Planner II - Village Planner


Planning and Development Department

Planning Division, Long Range Planning




Racelle Escolar

From: Tassie Phifer
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2024 12:54 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Item #7, Z-119-24-2




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


To whom it may concern,

My grandparents bought a property on 56th Street just south of Shea in the 1970's and it has remained in
our family since then. We love this neighborhood and have enjoyed what my grandfather called,
"Peaceful Street" for the last forty years. We were just informed that you are considering adding a
medical complex to a residential area and are shocked that you would steal from a peaceful residential
neighborhood by congesting our street with commercial traffic. In addition, we have watched traffic on
Shea become more and more unmanageable with the new light at Mountainside Fitness. Driving on Shea
in the evening is an absolute mess and this new build would exacerbate an already stressful traffic area.

We absolutely oppose this proposed building in our residential neighborhood.

Thank you,
Tasmyn Phifer




Racelle Escolar

From: Aimee Goldstein
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 3:13 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Opposition to item #7, X-119-24-2




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


Proposed project is too large and would create too much commercial traffic in a residential area. Please
scale back this project to a more appropriate size.

Thank you, resident at 10228 N. 58th St., Phoenix, AZ, 85253


Aimee Goldstein, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist
11811 North Tatum Blvd, Ste 3031
Phoenix, AZ 85028
480-278-2953




Racelle Escolar

From: Robert Zimmerman
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 12:51 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Item #7, Z-119-24-2




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this email.

Report Suspicious


To whom it may concern –

I wish to air my concerns about the abovementioned proposed project on Shea and 56th street. I have reviewed the
rezoning packed and familiarized myself with the proposed project.

I live at 10209 N. 56th Steet (5 parcels south of the proposed project) and have been there since January 2020. I am
intimately familiar with the community and tra ic patterns on this street.

I do not see a tra ic assessment in the rezoning packet and wonder how this could get to a Final Approval stage of
the Planning Committee without one. With the addition of the Honor Health project, along with the existing
Mountainside Fitness, and the home builder development you recently approved on 57 th and Shea, the congestion
on Shea from 64th Street (to the East) and almost Tatum (to the West) has been significant. Now, to add another
high-volume project to that mile plus zone seems unmanageable.

On 56th Street, you already have the Congregation Beth Isreal that has school pick up and drop o , along with
several events, that put strain on the coming and going from Shea on 56th Street. Now, immediately across from
the temple, we are considering a project that would possibly quadruple the current volume of vehicles on this
residential street.

I pose some serious hazards that this project would cause on 56 th street, so close to Shea Blvd.:

 I am concerned about the e ect that the tra ic on Shea, heading east and turning south onto 56th will back
up with cars trying to access the residential neighborhood, drop/pick up children o at the temple’s
school, and those trying to immediately make a left turn (once on 56th) to pull into the proposed projects
entrance. This is further exaggerated by residents, temple cars and cars exiting the proposed project all
stopped at the light at Shea and 56th, further making it even more di icult for through tra ic, while cars may
be backed up for those waiting to be able to access the proposed project via the previously described left
turn. By the way, during drop o and pick up the Temple has the 15 mph signs out which will also clearly
cause further back up. Also, they have a North access that they keep gated/blocked o , I assume because
the proximity to Shea causes too much congestion if they use that as an access. Was there ever study
done on this?

 I am concerned about the (likely) 12-15 month construction of the proposed project and the e ect on 56th
street. I have watched the home builder project that was previously approved on 57 th street and how that
construction is a ecting that street. Several cars, trucks and mobile construction equipment on that
street is disrupting the coming and going. That project wont even have car access to 57 th street but it is still
a mess. This proposed project is significantly larger and proposed access to 56 th and will be causing
congestion right at a significant streetlight.

 I am concerned about the e ect this higher tra ic volume will have on the tra ic partially caused by the
security the Congregation has on sight. Congregation Beth Isreal currently has at least two armed security
guards directing tra ic into and out of their parking lot every day. I see that they aren’t just directing tra ic
but are surveying cars attempting to enter the parking lot. I am completely in favor of the precautions that
the Congregation takes for its security and how this provides additional (indirect) security for the entire
community, so I would not want their process strained in any way. Their security process takes time, and a
significantly higher volume of vehicles on 56th street would strain this process.

 Lastly, I am probably most concerned about the children and security at the Congregation’s school. The
children cross 56th street multiple times per day to access their playground. The significant additional
tra ic on 56th caused by this proposed project will exponentially increase the danger to these children both
during the construction phase, and when the project is up and running. Cars pulling out of the proposed
project’s 56th street access, finding that the streetlight is all backed up (as already stated) will look to turn
left (south) in to the residential neighborhood for another route. This puts them immediately into a 15 mph
zone, and/or a security o icer (privately hired by the Temple) trying to safely walk students/children across
this NOW very busy street.

I sincerely hope you will take these comments seriously. I am all for progress, but this project poses significant
challenges for the Congregation, and the community that already reside there.

Please let me know if you have any questions.


Bob Zimmerman




This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of addressee and may contain proprietary or confidential information. If you are not the
intended recipient, any use, copying, disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately by return email and delete this communication and destroy all copies. Please note, any request to bind coverage, modify coverage or report a claim is
not valid until you receive confirmation from Heffernan Insurance Brokers that we have processed your request.




Racelle Escolar

From: Charles Ferguson
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 10:11 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Charles Ferguson; My Love
Subject: RE: #7, Z-119-24-2




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


Dear Planning Commission or whom it may concern.

We are 12 year residents of Phoenix and when we moved to this home approximately 2 years go we
specifically picked this location to raise our children due to the residential nature of the
neighborhood. We researched the zoning and saw that this site (item #7) in particular was zoned single-
family residential which would prohibit commercial development since any commercial development
would change the character of our immediate neighborhood. We also prided ourselves and shared with
friends that unlike other local municipalities the City of Phoenix is very well governed and resident's
concerns are addressed appropriately.

We became aware of this large commercial development 3 homes away from our home and the change
in zoning from single-family to high-density commercial and we are of course very concerned and
surprised.

This will be detrimental to the residential nature of our street where our kids and other neighborhood
children play. As the Commission may be aware, traffic backups on Shea are very frequent and guests of
this facility will not only use the street on which we reside but also cut down residential side roads in
order to access the facility in high-traffic times. These cut thru drivers and other visitors will not be aware
of the residential child friendly area and will increase the harm and risk to our children and others. There
is a church, a school and single-family homes on this street. How could one justify the dramatic change
in use but only for profit without regard for impact to the nature and safety of the immediate area. This is
a non-confirming change in use.

This application also significantly impacts our enjoyment of the neighborhood with increased traffic,
illuminated signage, two-story steel buildings, asphalt parking areas, transient commercial visitors and a
change from residential in nature to a commercial district with this one, new non-conforming use. This
problem of zoning is self-created by the developer where ample profit could be made to develop as
single-family residential as zoning currently allows where just like our home, where we have 30 and 40 ft
set backs, ample grading and drainage, a maximum lot density the fraction of what is proposed and most
importantly doesn't change the nature and character of the neibhorhood.

Please deny this application due to its detrimental impact on our immediate community.

Thank you, Charles

--
Charles Ferguson
10201 N. 56th Street
847.687.1341




Racelle Escolar

From: JOYCE COLLEY
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 3:28 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Item #7, Z-119-24-2




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


IT WAS BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION, TODAY DEC 31, 2024, THAT A MEDICAL COMPLEX BLDG WILL BE
BUILT ON 56TH ST AND SHEA. WE OPPOSE THIS BUILDING AS TRAFFIC IS ALREADY HORRIBLE IN OUR
AREA. IT IS ALREADY A 2 MILE BACKUP GOING WEST FROM 64THST AND THIS NEW BUILDING AND ALL
ITS PARKING WILL BE UNBELIEVABLE. IT WILL CAUSE MORE CARS GOING THRU OUR
NEIGHBORHOODS AND MORE TRAFFIC ON SHEA WITH MORE ACCIDENTS DAILY. PLEASE REVIEW
THIS PROPOSAL AND MAKE THE CORRECT CHOICES. WOULD YOU WANT THIS IN YOUR
NEIGHBORHOOD??? THERE ARE SO MANY EMPTY BUILDINGS ALREADY, WHY CAN’T THEY USE THEM .

DAVID AND JOYCE COLLEY
10210 N. 58TH ST
P.V., AZ 85253




Racelle Escolar

From: ualwhite@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 1:01 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Planning commission #7-Z-119-24-2




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


Email - pdd.planningcomm@phoenix.gov Subject: Planning Commission, #7 - Z-119-24-2


I live at 56th and Cholla and since Mountainside Fitness and HonorHealth built their facilities, it can
take an extra 15 to 20 minutes in stop and go traffic just to get to 56th street to get home. Under no
circumstances should there be another huge facility built in this area. Thank you.
Deborah White, MD
11448 N 54th Place




Racelle Escolar

From: Jay Snyder
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 5:59 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Jay Snyder
Subject: Item7,Z-119-24-2 rezone




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this email.

Report Suspicious




Dear Phoenix Commission Members

For the last 30 years, my wife and I have lived at 9591 N 56th Street 3 houses south of the proposed rezoning
application. Our neighborhood is just South of Mountain View.

I object strongly to the request for a large medical office building on Shea and 56th Steet for the following reasons :

1. Traffic issues This rezoning will create terrible traffic issues on 56 Street. Cars already use 56 st and Shea to go
south to Mountain View RD to avoid Shea . We have had several accidents at the left turn on 56 st and MTN
View. Further, before the home was built on our Cul de sac there were 3 accidents, one involving a roll over
and serious injury. South of Mountain View there are only 3 homes on each side of the street. Since drivers
cannot see it is a dead end they travel through at a high rate of speed only to make a quick turn, in frustration
and speed back towards Mountain View.

2. Schools The land is across the street from the proposed site has an elementary school.

3. Paradise Valley residential community. This development will disturb the residential neighborhood less than a
mile south.

4. Traffic study been completed?

Jay G. Snyder
Snyder Nationwide Real Estate
8141 E. Indian Bend Road Suite 107
Scottsdale, AZ 85250
Jay@brokerhotel.com
480-344-7500 Office
602-418-0282 Mobile




Racelle Escolar

From: Kathy Ketter
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 2:57 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Plan for Medical Complex at 56th St & Shea




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


To Whom It May Concern,

We strongly object to the approval of a 35,000 sq ft Medical Complex being built on the corner of Shea
and 56th Street. We especially have concerns about the proposed size of the complex which includes 90
surface parking spots plus a parking garage. We also strongly object to having ingress/egress on 56th
Street in part or in total.

The fairly recent developments along Shea including the Honor Health Urgent Care and Mountain Fitness
Gym on Shea along with the already established Beth Tefillah Synagogue/School on 56th and Shea have
greatly impacted traffic frequently in this area, causing long back-ups. The commercial building that is
currently under construction on 60th and Shea will only add to that problem. We don't need yet another
large commercial development in the area. This development ignores the quiet residential nature of 56th
Street and the surrounding neighborhoods.

Sincerely,

Ken and Kathy Ketter
9501 N 56th Street
Paradise Valley, AZ 85253




Racelle Escolar

From: Lissa Erickson
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 9:48 PM
To: Racelle Escolar; Adrian G Zambrano
Subject: Shea and 56th Rezoning




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


Dear Adrian and Racelle -

My name is Lissa Erickson. I and my family live at 10020 N. 58th Street and were active participants in
the attempt to deter the recent rezoning of the property at 57th and Shea, two years ago, when the
property was rezoned for RO usage against our community's wishes. We are now hearing - only from a
neighborhood flyer; never via any communication from the zoning applicant or the city - that, on top of
last year's decision to allow a non-residential (RO) structure for the first time in the Country Club Acre
community, there is now a current request suddenly being heard by the Planning Commission to create a
large, commercial medical complex at the corner of 56th and Shea, with no prior review by the Paradise
Valley Village planning committee; thus blocking any opportunity for the residents most affected by this
decision to communicate their extreme desire to keep our residential community intact, in the manner it
was intended: as a quiet, upscale single-dwelling residential community on 1+ acre plots of land.

At the time of the prior rezoning at 57th and Shea, as you each know, the direct neighborhood community
contiguous to that project - and this new project - were completely opposed to the project; and
expressed concerns at that time that the 57th Street rezoning would jump-start a precedence for other
commercial entities to make inroads into our community. We were assured by the PV
Planning Committee, and the Council, at that time that the RO rezoning would in no way threaten future
zoning issues in a manner that would detract from Country Club Acres. And yet here we are, no more
than a year and a half later, with a zoning request in hand to build a commercial, large-scale edifice right
in the midst of our community. It is hard to believe that the good intentions articulated two years ago by
your Council, were expressed in actual good faith; particularly with the jump over the standard
procedures requiring notification of the surrounding community; the lack of review by the PV Planning
Committee; and sufficient time and careful review of such a complete change to the nature of our
neighborhood. We have been given no notice, no voice, and no consideration for this massively
detrimental zoning request.

I request that this application be sent back down to the PV Council for a proper, and hopefully objective,
review of this new request and the horrific effect it would have on our community and the traffic patterns
on Shea Boulevard and our neighborhood streets. There is no excuse for this situation to be occurring
without any consideration given to the impact to those of us who live here, and love this community.

Please reconsider next steps for this application. What is happening in this instance is a travesty of the
procedures established for zoning requests. Please fix the process for this application, before
something occurs that would be exceedingly destructive to our families; and the greater Scottsdale
community.

Thank you in advance for your consideration,

Lissa Erickson
480-326-0993




Racelle Escolar

From: Lynn Schepp AZHomes4ACause.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 11:17 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Planning Commission, #7 - Z-119-24-2




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


Planning of a massive medical office complex for the southeast corner of 56th St and Shea Blvd. (The
former athletic field for Temple Beth Israel)
UNACCETAB:E WITH BACK UP TRAFFICE ON SHEA BLVD ALREADY


200 vehicle trips per hour
UNACCEPTABLE AIR QUALITY AND NOISE
worsen an already horrible situation. • With the traffic back-ups on Shea,
undoubtedly meander through the neighborhood residential streets to reach Doubletree Ranch Rd as an
alternate westerly street.
This massive development is an unreasonable level increased intensity and ignores the residential
nature of 56th Street and the greater neighborhood.


With a lack of quorum, Phoenix' Paradise Valley Village planning committee on Dec 2, so this request will
skip that step and go to directly to the Planning Commission on Jan 2 for final approval WITHOUT
QUORUM Makes for a Board Rules Regulation VIOLATION


We need to scale this back due to traffic, air quality, safety, infrastructure of streets, sewer and septic
tank concerns for the few homes that still cannot connect to sewer due to outside scope of measured
feet away from street


Lynn Peterfreund




Racelle Escolar

From: Lynn S
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 11:20 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Planning Commission, #7 - Z-119-24-2




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


Planning of a massive medical office complex for the southeast corner of 56th St and Shea Blvd. (The former
athletic field for Temple Beth Israel)
UNACCETAB:E WITH BACK UP TRAFFICE ON SHEA BLVD ALREADY


200 vehicle trips per hour
UNACCEPTABLE AIR QUALITY AND NOISE
worsen an already horrible situation. • With the traffic back-ups on Shea,
undoubtedly meander through the neighborhood residential streets to reach Doubletree Ranch Rd as an
alternate westerly street.
This massive development is an unreasonable level increased intensity and ignores the residential nature of
56th Street and the greater neighborhood.


With a lack of quorum, Phoenix' Paradise Valley Village planning committee on Dec 2, so this request will skip
that step and go to directly to the Planning Commission on Jan 2 for final approval WITHOUT QUORUM Makes
for a Board Rules Regulation VIOLATION


We need to scale this back due to traffic, air quality, safety, infrastructure of streets, sewer and septic tank
concerns for the few homes that still cannot connect to sewer due to outside scope of measured feet away
from street


Lynn Peters




Racelle Escolar

From: go2prescott@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 2:44 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Proposed medical complex 56th St and Shea




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


We object to co side ration and approval of a new 35,000sf Medical office building and garage on the SE
corner of 56th St and Shea.

Since the opening of the Mountainside Forness and Honor Health offices, and the new traffic light, along
with the new left turn signals at 56th St., traffic has become a nightmare. The backup, especially during
rush hours, and too long times for the light changes, has caused enormous inconveniences for local
residents and those traveling on Shea.
The school on 56th has already caused an increase of vehicles in our neighborhood.

If you allow this medical office building to go forward, we can count on patients, staff and visitors using
south 56th St to Mountain View as a conduit, increasing traffic on our street multi-fold with as many as
100 vehicles per hour based on the number of parking slots proposed and the relatively short “stay”
periods. 56th St and Mountain View are already used as a traffic cut-thru with both cars and commercial
vehicles Speeding down our streets.
The last thing we need is dozens more! At the least, restrict left hand turns out of the complex onto 56th
St

Please vote no on approval of this project. Save our neighborhood from more commercial traffic

Michael and Ellen Allen




Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS [apps.apple.com]




Racelle Escolar

From: Michele Adler Cohen
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 3:22 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Concern over scale of project on 56th/shea




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


To whom it may concern,

We are residents of this community in Paradise Valley and the proposed massive medical office building
is of great concern to our community. This project will create terrible conditions for traffic in our
community which already suffers from approval of massive projects in this area. Enough is enough! It's
time that city leaders do due dilligence with planning in order to preserve the residential nature of 56th
Street and the greater neighborhood.

Drs. Michele and Yaneav Cohen




Racelle Escolar

From: M A
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 4:40 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Vote NO -- Item #7, Z-119-24-2




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


Dear Planning Commission,


Reference Item #7, Z-119-24-2

I am sending this email to you as a single-family property owner who is literally just a few doors down
from the massive 35,000 square foot medical office facility with 90 surface parking spaces plus parking
garage that is proposed for the southeast corner of Shea Blvd. and North 56th Street. I bought my
property at 10019 N 56th Street in December 2019 thinking that I was moving into a residential
neighborhood. Traffic was low volume, there was a church down the street with polite drivers, and school
age children walked across the street full of energy, laughter and fun to play at recess.

Since then, the City of Phoenix Planning Commission has done nothing to preserve this neighborhood
but instead only promote it as a commercial mecca. To wit:

 Now, there are several assisted living homes on both 56th street and 57th street that have
increased neighborhood traffic. All of the cars from caretakers and those who visit these assisted
living residences funnel north on 56th Street past my home to turn left at the Shea Blvd. stop light.
 On top of that, the Planning Commission approved the enormous Mountainside Fitness facility
which has caused significantly more cars on Shea including those coming up 56th Street by my
home as well as a significant increase in accidents at the Shea Blvd. & 56th Street intersection -
so much so that the traffic lights at that interchange had to be expanded and the Shea Blvd. turn
lane reconfigured..
 Then, the Planning Commission approved tearing down La Camarilla tennis and sport facility to
replace it with --- a "small" hospital. This has caused so much traffic that a new stoplight had to
be installed at 52nd Street and Shea Blvd. This additional stoplight and the massive increase in
traffic on Shea causes traffic to backup more than a mile from Tatum during typical Monday-
Fridays (and well past 56th Street to the east).
 The additional cycle time of the remodeled stop light at Shea Blvd and 56th Street now causes
additional speeding as drivers do not want to "be caught" at the light and wait the extra time.
 With the significantly more traffic on Shea, many more drivers now take the neighborhood roads
to avoid it and drive easily 65mph by my home at all times of the day.
So much for my low traffic nice family and children oriented neighborhood. I find garbage that has been
thrown out of passing car windows nearly every day in front of my home now. Ask yourself if you want
cars driving 65 mph down your street. Do you want your children or grandchildren playing where cars
drive 65 mph by your house? Do you think that improves or declines property values?

My current situation is directly your fault, but you can take a stand now to stop this continued
commercial advancement into residential neighborhoods and the excessive traffic that is causing harm
to many in these neighborhoods. There is NO need to approve this request. As there were before you
approved the new Honor Health hospital where La Camarilla was on Shea Blvd., there are still (and even
more since then) available commercial spaces available very close by that are already in heavy traffic
managed areas and locations already with more than ample parking for this size facility. At the Tatum
and Shea intersection alone, the Northeast corner main tenant is still empty since Albertson's closed
that store. There is also still a significant empty space where Bed Bath and Beyond vacated. In addition,
on the Northwest corner, a large space sits empty since Whole Foods moved out. In addition, the new PV
development where Whole Foods moved to has a huge area for developing new builds as well as an
enormous amount of land for parking. There is just no reason to force this request into a neighborhood.

Lastly, outside of the obvious safety concern caused by having a two story development looking directly
down on an adjacent children's playground, safety of our children should be paramount when we make
decisions that will impact their daily lives. Given the speed at which cars pass my house today, I cannot
imagine what the impact of adding 200 vehicle trips per hour within just feet of where the children cross
56th Street each day will be - and this is only a minimum based on only half of the planned 90 surface
spaces plus parking garage spaces being occupied on an average every 30 minutes. Would you feel this
was a safe situation for your child or grandchild?

As a twenty-five year resident of Phoenix who loves our space, I strongly implore you to reject Item #7, Z-
119-24-2. Literally, there is already the new "small" hospital across the street to provide medical care
and numerous others in the immediate vicinity. There are sensible solutions for placement of a new
medical facility, but the Southeast corner of Shea Blvd and 56th Street is not one. Especially given the
many real estate options immediately available to the requesting party in very close proximity, the
significant additional complications this will cause to traffic at this intersection and throughout my
neighborhood's streets, and the increase in lack of safety for children, I urge you to deliver a message
that shows you value Phoenix taxpaying homeowners, Phoenix neighborhoods, and all Phoenix children.
Tell the requesting party to come back with an alternate solution that meets pro-Phoenix criteria.

Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

Monica Brooks
10019 N. 56th Street
Phoenix, AZ 85253




Racelle Escolar

From: Pamela Weyers
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 3:37 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: #7,Z-119-24-2




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


To whom it may concern,

I am very concerned about the proposed building at the SE corner of 56 th Street and Shea.

I am a resident down the street from this site. I understand the owner of the property has the right to
develop the land, however I do not believe the zoning should be changed from residential to commercial
for the following reasons:

 Having a large-scale commercial project on this corner will not preserve the character of my
residential community.
 The traffic created by such a project has the potential to make our residential streets more of a
through-fare. My small community in a particular could become a convenient turn-around area,
meaning more traffic and making it unsafe for the children who play in their front yards and ride
their bikes in the street in front of their houses.
 The current traffic lights already feel over-burdened with traffic. The addition of more cars turning
off Shea, or even worse turning onto or off of 56th Street to access a commercial driveway, would
overwhelm our corner. Should the project be approved regardless of our community request, I
strongly request that the only entrance and exit to the property be on Shea Blvd and not on
56th Street. This change would potentially lessen the traffic down 56 th Street.
 Additional traffic right next to a school is unwanted.


I appreciate your attention to my concerns. I hope you take into consideration that this is a residential
community and that a commercial building detracts from the sanctity of our homes and community.

Pamela Weyers
5539 E Beryl Ave.
Paradise Valley, AZ 85253
602-989-9449



Racelle Escolar

From: Patrick van den Bossche
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 3:59 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Proposed rezoning corner 56th Street & Shea (file # 17-5496)

Importance: High




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


We live at 9640 N. 57th Street not far from the site that is being proposed for the rezoning. We have
a concern about the additional traffic load that this project will cause in our quadrant and we would
like to see this project scaled back and not amplify what is already a growing traffic problem in the
56th Street and Shea corridor. We are also concerned that the additional traffic will pose safety
issues with the nearby school and the children that attend there.

Thank you for considering our concern and thank for considering scaling back this project.

Best Regards,

Patrick and Denise van den Bossche
M 602.821.0737
E pvdbossche@me.com




Racelle Escolar

From: Quinn.Williams@gtlaw.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 2:52 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Quinn.Williams@gtlaw.com
Subject: FW: Item7,Z-119-24-2 rezoning request on south east corner of 56th st and Shea




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this email.

Report Suspicious


Member of Planning Commission

Quinn Williams
Shareholder

Greenberg Traurig, LLP
2375 E. Camelback Rd. Suite 800 | Phoenix, AZ 85016
T +1 602.445.8343 | F +1 602.445.8647 | C +1 602.619.9002
Quinn.Williams@gtlaw.com | www.gtlaw.com [gtlaw.com] | View GT Biography [gtlaw.com]




From: Williams, Quinn P. (Shld-Phx-CP)
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 2:44 PM
To: 'pdd.planning@phoenix .gov'
Cc: 'George Burton'
Subject: Item7,Z-119-24-2 rezoning request on south east corner of 56th st and Shea

Phoenix Commission Members

For the last 15 years ,I have lived at 9731 n 56 th street south of the proposed rezoning applica on . Our neighborhood
is quarter mile south on 56st in Paradise Valley.

I object strongly to the request for a large medical office bldg. on Shea and 56 th st for the following reasons :

1) Traffic issues This rezoning will create terrible traffic issues on 56 st . Cars already use 56 st and Shea to go
south to Mountain View RD to avoid Shea . We have had several accidents at the le turn on 56 st and MTN
View.
2) Schools The land is across the street from 2 schools on 56 st for elementary children .
3) The traffic lights at the intersec on .The lights were just installed last year and accidents have already occurred.
4) Paradise Valley residen al community ….This development will disturb the residen al neighborhood less than
a mile south . Has this request been ve ed with the Traffic department of Paradise Valley ?
5) Traffic study Please do a traffic study on 56 t before you approve !




Quinn Williams
Shareholder

Greenberg Traurig, LLP
2375 E. Camelback Rd. Suite 800 | Phoenix, AZ 85016
T +1 602.445.8343 | F +1 602.445.8647 | C +1 602.619.9002
Quinn.Williams@gtlaw.com | www.gtlaw.com [gtlaw.com] | View GT Biography [gtlaw.com]




If you are not an intended recipient of confidential and privileged information in this email, please delete
it, notify us immediately at postmaster@gtlaw.com, and do not use or disseminate the information.




Racelle Escolar

From: tomvalalt@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 12:02 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: planning comm #7-Z119-24-2




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


please, please, please, reconsider approval of this request for the corner of 56th Street and Shea. The
size and mass of the project is not only excessive but has many alternate reasons why it should be
denied. With the addition of the new health center and the workout facility, traffic on Shea has increased
tremendously. Frequent backups stall traffic in all lanes in that area to Tatum and beyond to the West
and back toward the east as well. Cars coming south off 56th Street add to the the congestion as well.
Traffic on 56 has increased both North and South with access from Shea to the 101, few drive the speed
limit in spite of the slowdown in my area - (Sweetwater) with the school and the horse arena, and we have
frequent impatient red light runners causing accidents at my corner-56 and Sweetwater. (another one
just this past week). When traffic is backed up on Shea, it seems logical that people will look for an
alternate way to get around, traveling to the south through the neighborhood of residential streets. and
this is not what these people bought their homes in that area for. Health issues also should be
considered for the idling traffic sitting. waiting for the lights to change as our air quality is diminishing. I
know progress is inevitable but this just seems the absolute worst location to put in a large commercial
project and I hope you will listen to resident concerns when deciding on approval or disapproval.
Thank you for your consideration in a matter, that means so much to local residents, versus the big
corporate involvement!

Valerie Altgilbers
5538 East Sweetwater 85254
602-677-0366
Sent from AOL on Android [play.google.com]




Racelle Escolar

From: David
Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2025 8:25 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Project 56th and Shea




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


To whom it may concern,

I am greatly concerned about the site and scale of the project being proposed for the medical facility at
56th and Shea. This is a residential neighborhood with increasing traffic, congestion and businesses
being built here. The shear size is the most concern for a residential neighborhood. I just learned of this
and thus why I am just emailing now. I appreciate the board taking these concerns into account when
allowing such a project.

David Matthew Zawrotny

-----------------------------------------







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing and Possible Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-158-
24-7 - Approximately 560 Feet North of the Northeast Corner of 20th Avenue and
Van Buren Street (Ordinance G-7367) - District 7

Request to hold a public hearing on a proposal to amend the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning
Application Z-158-24-7 and rezone the site from R-3 (Multifamily Residence District) to
R-5 (Multifamily Residence District - Restricted Commercial) for office for professional
use - counseling services.

Summary
Current Zoning: R-3
Proposed Zoning: R-5
Acreage: 0.17
Proposal: Office for professional use - counseling services

Owner/Applicant: Neighborhood Christian Clinic, Inc.
Representative: Peter Furlow, Quarles & Brady, LLP

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Central City Village Planning Committee heard this item on January
13, 2025, and recommended denial, by a vote of 10-0-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on February 6, 2025, and
recommended denial, per the Central City Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 9-0.
The applicant's representative appealed the Planning Commission recommendation
on February 13, 2025, in order to have a public hearing on the item.

Location
Approximately 560 feet north of the northeast corner of 20th Avenue and Van Buren
Street
Council District: 7
Parcel Address: 343 N. 20th Avenue

Responsible Department



This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-158-24-7) FROM R-3 (MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT) TO R-5 (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE
DISTRICT – RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL).
____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 0.17-acre site located approximately 560 feet

north of the northeast corner of 20th Avenue and Van Buren Street in a portion of

Section 1, Township 1 North, Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit

“A,” is hereby changed from “R-3” (Multifamily Residence District) to “R-5” (Multifamily

Residence District – Restricted Commercial).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,




violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The maximum building height shall be limited to two stories or 30 feet.

2. A pedestrian gate shall be provided at the southeast corner of the site as
depicted on the site plan date stamped November 13, 2024, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

3. A minimum of four bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U
and/or artistic racks and installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H. of
the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. Artistic racks shall adhere to the City of Phoenix Preferred
Designs in Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.

4. A minimum of one of the required bicycle parking spaces shall include standard
electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

5. Bicycle parking spaces shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping, or a
combination of the two to provide a minimum of 75% shade, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

6. A minimum of one green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) element for
stormwater management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This
includes but is not limited to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales,
permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure
and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater Management.

7. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the Water Efficiency Checkup
program for a minimum of 10 years, or as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

8. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

9. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.




10. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

11. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

12. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 5th day of March,

2025.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney




By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-158-24-7

THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE1/4) OF SECTION 1,
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
LOT 22, OF LYONHURST PLACE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF RECORD IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA, RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS, PAGE 68.




ATTACHMENT B




Staff Report Z-158-24-7
January 3, 2025

Central City Village Planning Committee January 13, 2025
Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 6, 2025
Request From: R-3 (Multifamily Residence District)
(0.17-acres)
Request To: R-5 (Multifamily Residence District–
Restricted Commercial) (0.17-acres)
Proposal: Office for professional use – counseling
services
Location: Approximately 560 feet north of the
northeast corner of 20th Avenue and
Van Buren Street
Owner/Applicant: Neighborhood Christian Clinic, Inc.
Representative: Peter Furlow, Quarles & Brady, LLP
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations

General Plan Conformity
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units
General Plan Land Use Map Designation
per acre

Street Map
20th Avenue Local 30-foot east half street
Classification
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES & NEIGHBORHOODS CORE VALUE;
CERTAINTY & CHARACTER; DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Promote neighborhood
identity through planning that reinforces the existing landscaping and character
of the area. Each new development should contribute to the character identified
for the village.

As stipulated, the proposal will promote neighborhood identity by limiting the maximum
building height to two stories. This ensures that the site will be developed in alignment
with the existing urban form of the surrounding residential neighborhood.




Staff Report: Z-158-24-7
January 3, 2025


CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; BICYCLES; DESIGN
PRINCIPLE: Development should include convenient bicycle parking.

The proposal, as stipulated, includes shaded bicycle parking and electric bike charging
to encourage bicycling and transit use by leveraging its proximity to nearby parks,
schools, neighborhoods, and transit stops.
BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; DESIGN PRINCIPLE:
Integrate trees and shade into the design of new development and
redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.

The proposal includes existing mature shade trees and, as stipulated, includes shaded
bicycle parking. This will create a comfortable pedestrian environment by reducing the
urban heat island affect and making the walk to nearby destinations safer and more
comfortable.


Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan: Background Item No. 6.

Transportation Electrification Action Plan: Background Item No. 7.

Tree and Shade Master Plan: Background Item No. 8.

Complete Streets Guidelines: Background Item No. 9.

Zero Waste PHX: Background Item No. 10.

Phoenix Climate Action Plan: Background Item No. 11.

Conservation Measures for New Development: Background Item No. 12.


Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning
Land Use Zoning
On Site Single family-residential R-3
North Single-family-residential R-3
East Church A-1
West (Across 20th Avenue) Single-family-residential R-3
Duplex/multifamily-
South R-3
residential




Staff Report: Z-158-24-7
January 3, 2025


R-5 (Multifamily Residence District–Restricted Commercial)
(Non-Residential Uses subject to C-1 District Standards)
Requirements of C-1 Provisions on the Proposed
Standards
District Site Plan
Minimum Building Setbacks
Adjacent to Streets Average 25 feet; minimum 20 feet (Not Met, Existing
(West, 20th Avenue) 20 feet for up to 50 Condition)
(For Structures Not percent of structure
Exceeding Two Stories
or 30 Feet)
Not Adjacent to Streets 0 feet East: 15 feet (Met)
(Adjacent to A-1)
(For Structures Not
Exceeding Two Stories
or 30 Feet)
Not Adjacent to Streets North and South: 50 feet North: 13 feet (Not Met,
(Adjacent to R-3) Existing Condition)
(For Structures Not
Exceeding Two Stories South: 7 feet (Not Met)*
or 30 Feet)
Minimum Landscaped Setbacks
Adjacent to Streets Average 25 feet for 20 feet (Not Met, Existing
(West, 20th Avenue) structures not exceeding Condition)*
two stories or 30 feet,
minimum 20 feet permitted
for up to 50% of the
frontage
Not Adjacent to Streets 0 feet East: Not depicted
(Adjacent to A-1)
Not Adjacent to Streets North and South: 10 feet North and south: Not depicted
(Adjacent to R-3)
Maximum Lot Coverage 50 percent 34% (Met)
Maximum Building Height Two Stories, 30 feet Two stories, 22 feet and 1
inch (Met)
Minimum Parking 6 spaces 2 spaces (Not Met)*
(1.5 space per unit and 1
space per 300 square feet
of office)
*Variance or Site Plan modification may be needed




Staff Report: Z-158-24-7
January 3, 2025


Background/Issues/Analysis

SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone 0.17-acres located approximately 560 feet north of the
northeast corner of 20th Avenue and Van Buren Street from R-3 (Multifamily
Residence District) to R-5 (Multifamily Residence District – Restricted Commercial)
for a counseling office. The subject site is currently a single-family residence and is
proposed to remain, with a proposed addition to be constructed at the rear of the
property for the counseling office.

GENERAL PLAN
2. The subject site is
designated as Residential
3.5 to 5 dwelling units per
acre. The areas to the west
(across 20th Avenue), north,
and south are designated
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre. The area to
the east is designated as
Industrial. The proposed R-5
zoning district is not
consistent with the General
Plan Land Use Map
designation; however, a
General Plan Land Use Map; Source: Planning and Development Department
General Plan Amendment
is not required because the site is less than 10 acres in size.

SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING
3. To the west (across 20th Avenue), north,
and south are single-family and
duplex/multifamily residences zoned R-3;
and to the east is a church zoned A-1
(Light Industrial District).




General Plan Land Use Map; Source: Planning and Development Department




Staff Report: Z-158-24-7
January 3, 2025


PROPOSAL
4. Site Plan
The proposal is for a counseling office. The existing residence will remain as a
residential use and the counseling office will be accommodated in a new two-story
structure located at the rear of the property. The conceptual site plan, attached as
an exhibit, depicts the site layout including the location of the existing residence,
proposed counseling office, proposed breezeway, existing carport, two tandem
parking spaces, existing landscaping, and proposed pathway and pedestrian gate
at the rear of the property. The site will have one point of ingress/egress on 20th
Avenue. To the east, the subject site borders a church property that includes the
Neighborhood Christian Clinic, a non-profit medical and dental facility. Access to
the proposed counseling office is intended via the proposed rear gate, after
passing through the existing clinic building on the adjacent church property. The
subject site includes two tandem parking spaces and does not meet the required
number of on-site parking spaces; a variance will be required. The applicant stated
in their submittal materials that patients will be permitted to park on the adjacent
site to the east, via a cross-access agreement.

To ensure connectivity with the adjacent church site, staff recommends Stipulation
No. 2 to require a pedestrian gate at the rear of the property. To support cyclist
safety, convenience, and connectivity staff recommends Stipulation Nos. 3 through
5 to require a minimum of four shaded bicycle parking spaces and that once
bicycle parking space include an electric receptacle for electric bicycle charging
capabilities.




Conceptual Site Plan; Source: Eric Leibosohn + Associates Ltd.




Staff Report: Z-158-24-7
January 3, 2025


5. Conceptual Building Elevations
The conceptual building elevations, included as an exhibit, depict the existing one-
story residence and the proposed two-story counseling office. Commercial uses in
the R-5 zoning district are limited to two stories and 30 feet in height, while
multifamily residential uses may reach up to four stories or 48 feet in height. To
ensure the site retains the character of the surrounding residential area, staff
recommends Stipulation No. 1 to limit the height of any proposed building to two
stories or 30 feet




Conceptual Building Elevations; Source: Eric Leibosohn + Associates Ltd.




Staff Report: Z-158-24-7
January 3, 2025


STUDIES AND POLICIES
6. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan:
The City of Phoenix adopted the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan in 2014 to
guide the development of its bikeway system and supportive infrastructure. The
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan supports options for both short- and long-term
bicycle parking as a means of promoting bicyclist traffic to a variety of destinations.

To create a bike-supportive environment for employees and patients, bicycle
infrastructure is incorporated into the proposed project. Staff recommends
Stipulation Nos. 3 through 5 which will require shaded bicycle parking and electric
bicycle charging facilities be provided on site.

7. Transportation Electrification Action Plan
In June 2022, the Phoenix City Council approved the Transportation Electrification
Action Plan. The current market desire for the electrification of transportation is
both a national and global phenomenon, fueled by a desire for better air quality, a
reduction in carbon emissions, and a reduction in vehicle operating and
maintenance costs. Businesses, governments and the public are signaling strong
future demand for electric vehicles (EVs), and many automobile manufacturers
have declared plans for a transition to fully electric offerings within the coming
decade. This Plan contains policy initiatives to prepare the City for a future filled
with more EVs, charging infrastructure and e-mobility equity, and outlines a
roadmap for a five-step plan to prepare for the EV infrastructure needs of 280,000
EVs in Phoenix by 2030. One goal of the Plan to accelerate public adoption of
electric vehicles through workplace, business, and multifamily charging
infrastructure recommends a standard stipulation for rezoning cases to provide EV
charging infrastructure. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 4, which requires a
minimum of one bicycle parking space include outlets for electric bicycle charging.

8. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan encourages treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure the trees are an integral part of the City’s planning and
development process. Sidewalks on the street frontage should be detached from
the curb to allow trees to be planted on both sides of the sidewalk to provide
thermal comfort for pedestrians and to reduce the urban heat island effect. The
proposal, as stipulated, will require that all bicycle parking spaces be shaded
(Stipulation No. 5).

9. Complete Streets Guidelines
The City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding Principles.
The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an accessible,
safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such as bicycles,
pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. The proposed development, as stipulated, will
support walking, bicycling and transit use by including shaded bicycle parking,




Staff Report: Z-158-24-7
January 3, 2025


electric bicycle charging capabilities, and interconnectivity with the adjacent church
site. This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 2 through 5.

10. Zero Waste Phoenix PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal to
become a zero waste city, as part of the city’s overall 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and
expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs.

Section 716 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance establishes standards to encourage
the provision of recycling containers for multifamily, commercial, and mixed-use
developments meeting certain criteria. The applicant stated in their submittal
materials that they will seek to provide recycling on the site if possible.

11. Phoenix Climate Action Plan
In October 2021, the Phoenix City Council approved the Climate Action Plan. The
Climate Action Plan will serve as a long-term plan to achieve greenhouse gas
emissions reductions and resiliency goals from local operations and community
activities as well as prepare for the impacts of climate change. This plan contains
policy and initiatives regarding stationary energy, transportation, waste
management, air quality, local food systems, heat, and water. Goal W2 (Water),
Action W2.4, pertains to the implementation of the Greater Phoenix Metro Green
Infrastructure (GI) and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater
Management to benefit the environment, promote water conservation, reduce
urban heat, improve the public health, and create additional green spaces. This
goal is addressed in Stipulation No. 6, which requires a minimum of one GI
technique for stormwater management to be implemented in this development.

12. Conservation Measures for New Development
In June 2023, the Phoenix City Council adopted the Conservation Measures for
New Development policy as part of a resolution addressing the future water
consumption of new development (Resolution 22129). This resolution addresses
the future water consumption of new development to support one of the City’s Five
Core Values in the General Plan which calls for Phoenix to - Build the Sustainable
Desert City. The Conservation Measures for New Development policy includes
direction to develop standards for consideration as stipulations for all rezoning
cases that will address best practices related to water usage in nine specific
categories. This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 6 and 7.

COMMUNITY CORRESONDENCE
13. As of the writing of this report, no letters of support or opposition have been
received for the request.




Staff Report: Z-158-24-7
January 3, 2025


INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
14. The Street Transportation Department requested that the developer construct all
improvements in the right-of-way with all required elements and to ADA standards,
which is addressed in Stipulation No. 8.

OTHER
15. The site is located in a larger area identified as being archaeologically sensitive. If
further review by the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office determines the site and
immediate area to be archaeologically sensitive, and if no previous archaeological
projects have been conducted within this project area, it is recommended that
archaeological Phase I data testing of this area be conducted. Phase II
archaeological data recovery excavations may be necessary based upon the
results of the testing. A qualified archaeologist must make this determination in
consultation with the City of Phoenix Archaeologist. In the event archaeological
materials are encountered during construction, all ground disturbing activities must
cease within a 33-foot radius of the discovery and the City of Phoenix Archaeology
Office must be notified immediately and allowed time to properly assess the
materials. This is addressed in Stipulations Nos. 9 through 11.

16. Staff has not received a completed form for the Waiver of Claims for Diminution in
Value of Property under Proposition 207 (A.R.S. 12-1131 et seq.), as required by
the rezoning application process. Therefore, a stipulation has been added to
require the form be completed and submitted prior to final site plan approval. This
is addressed in Stipulation No. 12.

17. Development and use of the site are subject to all applicable codes and
ordinances. Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements. Other
formal actions such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and abandonments
may be required.

Findings

1. The proposal will be limited to two stories and will be compatible with the
character of the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposal provides for an increase in intensity that is sensitive to local
conditions.

3. The proposal will add additional office space to address the needs of the clinic to
the east of the subject site.

Stipulations:

1. The maximum building height shall be limited to two stories or 30 feet.




Staff Report: Z-158-24-7
January 3, 2025



2. A pedestrian gate shall be provided at the southeast corner of the site as
depicted on the site plan date stamped November 13, 2024, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

3. A minimum of four bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U
and/or artistic racks and installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H. of
the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. Artistic racks shall adhere to the City of Phoenix Preferred
Designs in Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.

4. A minimum of one of the required bicycle parking spaces shall include standard
electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

5. Bicycle parking spaces shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping, or a
combination of the two to provide a minimum of 75% shade, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

6. A minimum of one green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) element for
stormwater management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This
includes but is not limited to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales,
permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure
and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater Management.

7. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the Water Efficiency Checkup
program for a minimum of 10 years, or as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

8. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

9. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

10. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified




Staff Report: Z-158-24-7
January 3, 2025


archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

11. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

12. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

Writer
Samuel Rogers
January 3, 2025

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
Zoning sketch map
Aerial sketch map
Conceptual Site Plan date stamped November 13, 2024 (2 pages)
Conceptual Elevations date stamped November 13, 2024 (3 pages)




A-1
Z-111-00
C-3*
A-1
Z-111-00
Z-166-61


R-3
18TH DR

20TH DR
POLK ST


21ST AVE 19TH AVE


20TH AVE
R-3
HP
Z-128-04
R-4*
Z-28-18




R-4 * Capitol Mall
Z-28-18
Overlay

C-3 VAN BUREN ST District




¯ Miles
MC DOWELL RD
I-10
VAN BUREN ST
Z-158-24-7


0 0.02 0.04 0.08 BUCKEYE RD
CENTRAL CITY VILLAGE I-17
LOWER BUCKEYE RD

40TH ST
7TH AVE
COUNCIL DISTRICT: 7

16TH ST 24TH ST
19TH AVE
CENTRAL AVE
7TH ST

REQUESTED CHANGE:
APPLICANT'S NAME: Quarles & Brady LLP
FROM: R-3 ( 0.17 ac.)
DATE:
11/19/2024
APPLICATION NO: Z-158-24-7 REVISION DATES:

GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
ZONING MAP TO:
R-5 ( 0.17 ac.)
0.17 Acres QS 11-24 F-7
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D OPTION
R-3 2 3
R-5 7 9
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus 378
S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2024\Z-158-24.aprx
A-1
Z-111-00
C-3*
A-1
Z-111-00
Z-166-61


R-3
18TH DR

20TH DR
POLK ST


21ST AVE 19TH AVE


20TH AVE
R-3
HP
Z-128-04
R-4*
Z-28-18




R-4 * Capitol Mall
Z-28-18
Overlay

C-3 VAN BUREN ST District




¯ Miles
MC DOWELL RD
I-10
VAN BUREN ST
Z-158-24-7


0 0.02 0.04 0.08 BUCKEYE RD
CENTRAL CITY VILLAGE I-17
LOWER BUCKEYE RD

40TH ST
7TH AVE
COUNCIL DISTRICT: 7

16TH ST 24TH ST
19TH AVE
CENTRAL AVE
7TH ST

REQUESTED CHANGE:
APPLICANT'S NAME: Quarles & Brady LLP
FROM: R-3 ( 0.17 ac.)
DATE:
11/19/2024
APPLICATION NO: Z-158-24-7 REVISION DATES:

GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
ZONING MAP TO:
R-5 ( 0.17 ac.)
0.17 Acres QS 11-24 F-7
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D OPTION
R-3 2 3
R-5 7 9
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus 379
S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2024\Z-158-24.aprx




















ATTACHMENT C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-158-24-7


Date of VPC Meeting January 13, 2025
Request From R-3
Request To R-5
Proposal Office for professional use – counseling services
Approximately 560 feet north of the northeast corner of
Location
20th Avenue and Van Buren Street
VPC Recommendation Denial
VPC Vote 10-0-1


VPC DISCUSSION:

Two members of the public registered to speak on this item, in opposition.

STAFF PRESENTATION
Samuel Rogers, staff, provided a presentation regarding the proposal, reviewing the
surrounding context, policy background, existing and proposed zoning, the proposed
development, and the staff recommendation.

Committee Member Patrick Panetta asked if the request required a zoning change or
if it could be addressed through a special use permit. Mr. Rogers explained that the
site is currently zoned R-3, explained that most of the City’s multifamily zoning districts
do not allow for a mix of uses, stated that R-5 is the only multifamily zoning district that
permits a mix of uses, and explained that the R-5 request would maintain residential
zoning in the area while also allowing for office use.

Committee Member Panetta inquired about the availability of a variance process. Mr.
Rogers confirmed that there is no variance process applicable in this case.

Committee Member Zach Burns asked if the site would be used as both residential
and counseling space. Mr. Rogers confirmed that the residence will remain, and the
counseling office will be located in the back of the property.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Central City Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-158-24-7
January 13, 2025


Committee Member Panetta expressed concern about future uses of the site rather
than the current use. Mr. Rogers explained that a stipulation was included to limit the
site to two stories, ensuring it aligns with the character of the residential neighborhood,
stated that the site’s small size inherently limits future developments, and explained
that the committee could include an additional stipulation limiting the number of units to
one unit maximum.

Committee Member Jordan Greenman asked about access to the site and whether
bike parking spaces would be located on the site or on an adjacent parcel. Mr. Rogers
stated that the bike parking spaces will be located on the site itself, explained the City
cannot stipulate conditions on properties other than the subject site, stated bicycle
parking was required to accommodate the clinic’s focus on serving individuals without
insurance or those unable to afford counseling, and stated the site is near a Transit-
Oriented Community planning area.

Committee Member Ryan Ban inquired about the name of the church adjacent to the
property. Mr. Rogers identified the church as Neighborhood Ministries. Committee
Member Ban asked if the church has any affiliation with the proposed counseling
service. Mr. Rogers stated that the counseling service is called Neighborhood Christian
Clinic (NCC) and stated that the applicant could provide further details.

APPLICANT PRESENTATION
Peter Furlow, representing the applicant, clarified that Neighborhood Ministries leases
the land to NCC, explained that NCC's mission focuses on patient-centered counseling
services, and stated his team would have preferred a use permit or variance, but
rezoning to R-5 was the only viable option. Mr. Furlow presented the proposed site
plan, explained how patients will access the site, stated that outreach letters were sent
in English, stated that on future Central City cases the applicant team would provide
notification in English and Spanish, explained that Spanish speakers staffed the
neighborhood meeting, and stated that four neighbors attended the meeting.

QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE
Committee Member Ryan Ban raised concerns regarding a funding source connected
to a hate group that targets LGBTQ+ individuals and the possibility of counseling
services promoting anti-LGBTQ+ practices. Mr. Furlow stated that the referenced
donor is one of hundreds of funding sources, explained that NCC has been operating in
the city for 20 years with a positive reputation, and stated he would be surprised if NCC
supports such practices.

Committee Member Janey Pearl Starks asked about the two homes adjacent to the
property, potential outreach, and asked about access from the front of the subject site.
Mr. Furlow explained that one of the neighbors had attended the meeting and

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 386
Central City Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-158-24-7
January 13, 2025


supported the proposal but expressed privacy concerns and explained that the
proposed structure will not have windows on the north and south sides to address
these concerns. Paul Lorentsen, with the applicant team, explained that the other
adjacent property owner was aware of the project and stated that they had reached out
to the neighbor to purchase their property, but the owner declined the offer.

Committee Member Ban asked if therapists would be from out of state. Mr.
Lorentsen explained that a staff councilor that lives in Arizona would stay in the home
with out-of-state students completing rotations.

Committee Member Rachel Frazier Johnson asked who would stay in the house and
whether it would involve overnight patients. Mr. Lorentsen stated there would be no
overnight patients, explained that students are intended to stay in the home, stated
local students have not used the space much, and explained the concept is to have a
couple live and oversee the home as “dorm parents” with students staying and
completing one-month rotations.

Committee Member Nate Sonoskey asked whether the existing home could be used
for counseling services without rezoning and why the City recommended R-5 zoning
instead of R-O. Mr. Rogers explained that counseling services are not permitted in the
current R-3 zoning district, stated he would need to verify details about R-O zoning,
and stated that the proposed R-5 zoning is compatible the R-3 zoning district
surrounding the site. Committee Member Frazier Johnson suggested that the
proposed height might be a reason the R-5 zoning district is proposed rather than R-O.
Committee Member Sonoskey asked if the R-O zoning district allows for heights up to
30 feet. Mr. Rogers stated he would need to check this information.

Committee Member Starks asked if there was a way to ensure the clinic is inclusive
and not harmful. Mr. Rogers explained that it is challenging to regulate inclusivity
through zoning stipulations. Mr. Lorentsen explained that the clinic provides patient-
centered counseling that supports individuals' differing spiritualities.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mr. Michael Nowakowski stated he is concerned about the proposal, explained that
the mailer lacked an address, stated that the neighborhood meeting on December 4th
occurred during the holidays and limited attendance, stated that people experiencing
homelessness are prevalent in the area due to Central Arizona Shelter Services
(CASS), stated he supports Neighborhood Ministries but stated concerns about future
uses such as a sober living home, emphasized the community's efforts to clean up the
area and maintain its character, recounted efforts to not allow a mechanic shop and a
hairdresser, stated that the neighborhood lacks two-story homes, explained a two-story
building would not fit the community's aesthetic, explained that he is okay with the
Neighborhood Services Department (NSD)-owned properties from Van Buren to


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 387
Central City Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-158-24-7
January 13, 2025


Filmore because those are adjacent to the railroad tracks, and expresses parking
concerns if the Neighborhood Ministries parking lot becomes full.

Oscar Cota stated he has been involved with the community since 1985, stated he has
attended Neighborhood Services meetings, stated he supports the church, and noted
that Neighborhood Ministries has ample space to accommodate NCC’s needs. Mr.
Cota stated that there are no other two-story homes in the neighborhood, stated
concerns that the R-5 zoning district will make it so the neighborhood cannot be
designated as a historic neighborhood, and expressed concerns with lighting.

APPLICANT RESPONSE
Mr. Furlow explained that the proposed structure would be 23 feet tall, which is below
the current R-3 zoning height limit of 30 feet, explained that sober living homes are
already permitted within the R-3 zoning district, stated communication efforts included
bilingual staff at the meeting, and stated that notifications for future projects will include
both English and Spanish.

Committee Member Rachel Frazier Johnson asked if R-5 zoning would exclude the
site from historic designation. Mr. Furlow clarified that the existing historic home on the
property would not be altered, as the additional structure is planned for the back of the
lot. Committee Member Jordan Greenman noted that if a new historic district were
established, the site could potentially be excluded from a potential historic district’s
boundary.

FLOOR/PUBLIC DISCUSSION CLOSED: MOTION, DISCUSSION, AND VOTE
Chair Cyndy Gaughan asked for a motion or ideas for additional stipulations.

Vice Chair Darlene Martinez expressed concerns about setting a precedent for R-5
zoning in the neighborhood and noted concerns after reviewing the property layout.

MOTION
Vice Chair Darlene Martinez made a motion to recommend denial of Z-158-24-7.
Committee Member Ryan Ban seconded the motion.

VOTE
10-0-1; Motion to recommend denial of Z-158-24-7, passed, with Committee Members
Ban, Burns, Burton, Frazier Johnson, Panetta, Sonoskey, Starks, Vargas, Martinez,
and Gaughan in favor and Committee Member Greenman abstained.

Committee Member Nate Sonoskey commented that the applicant and City should
revisit R-5 zoning as the solution, suggesting alternative uses or layouts to meet the
applicant’s goals.


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 388
Central City Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-158-24-7
January 13, 2025


Committee Member Zach Burns highlighted prior cases of spot zoning and suggested
the need for a use permit or special permit process.

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 389
ATTACHMENT D

REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
February 6, 2025

ITEM NO: 5
DISTRICT NO.: 7
SUBJECT:

Application #: Z-158-24-7
Location: Approximately 560 feet north of the northeast corner of 20th Avenue and
Van Buren Street
From: R-3
To: R-5
Acreage: 0.17
Proposal: Office for professional use - counseling services
Applicant: Neighborhood Christian Clinic, Inc.
Owner: Neighborhood Christian Clinic, Inc.
Representative: Peter Furlow, Quarles & Brady, LLP

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Central City 1/13/2025 Denial. Vote: 10-0-1.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Denial, per the Central City Village Planning
Committee recommendation.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to deny Z-158-24-7, per the Central
City Village Planning Committee recommendation.

Maker: Matthews
Second: Gorraiz
Vote: 9-0
Absent: None
Opposition Present: Yes

Findings:

Although staff recommended approval, subject to stipulations, the Planning Commission
did not agree with the increased intensity and uses for this one lot in the neighborhood
even with the stipulations.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact Teleia
Galaviz at 602-291-2559, teleia.galaviz@phoenix.gov, TTY: Use 7-1-1.




ATTACHMENT E

CITY OF PHOENIX
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

FORM TO REQUEST PC to CC
I HEREBY REQUEST THAT THE CC HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON:

APPLICATION NO/ Z-158-24-7 (SIGNATURE ON ORIGINAL IN FILE)
LOCATION Approximately 560 opposition applicant X
feet north of the
northeast corner of
20th Avenue and
Van Buren Street

APPEALED FROM: PC 2/6/2024 Quarles & Brady LLP
2 North Central Avenue, Suite 600
Phoenix, AZ 85004

PC DATE STREET/ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP

TO PC/CC CC 3/5/2025 Peter Furlow
HEARING 602-229-5253
Peter.furlow@quarles.com

CC DATE NAME / PHONE / EMAIL
REASON FOR REQUEST:

The Planning Commission recommended denial of Rezoning Case No. Z-158-24-7,
as applicant we request a public hearing at the March 5, 2025 City Council Hearing.


RECEIVED BY: Dom Amodio RECEIVED ON: 2/13/2025

Joshua Bednarek Camryn Thompson
Tricia Gomes Danny J. Inglese
Racelle Escolar GIS
Sarah Stockham Byron Easton (for PHO appeals only)
Adam Stranieri Village Planner
Stephanie Vasquez Applicant
Heather Klotz
Dalia Adams




REVISED 10/16/2024 vcm



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing and Resolution adopting Legal Finding for the 69th & Thomas
Redevelopment Area (Resolution 22282) - District 7

Public Hearing and adoption of Resolution 22282 finding the existence of a
Redevelopment Area in the City of Phoenix and declaring the necessity of such
area. The area is located at the southwest corner of 69th Avenue and Thomas
Road.

Summary
In February 2025, a third-party analysis of existing conditions, 69th & Thomas
Redevelopment Report (the "Report") (Attachment B) prepared by ABLA, LLC
(ABLA) was submitted to the Planning and Development Department. The Report
proposes the creation of the 69th & Thomas Redevelopment Area for 9.94 acres of
property near 69th Avenue and Thomas Road.

A Redevelopment Area designation aims to identify the presence of “Blighted” or
“Slum Conditions” as defined by Arizona’s Redevelopment Statue, Arizona Revised
Statue (ARS) 36-1471 et seq. (the “Act”). This analysis is crucial in determining
whether the proposed site can be designated as a “Redevelopment Area.” The
Redevelopment Area (subject site) consists of 5 parcels that will be combined into
one approximately 10-acre parcel for redevelopment as part of a single project.

The NRP Group (the “Developer”) is in escrow to acquire the subject site and
proposes to develop it with an affordable housing multi-family project pursuant to
GPA-MV-1-24-7 and rezoning case Z-53-24-7. The subject site faces numerous
physical and public safety challenges that have hindered its redevelopment. ABLA's
Report states that the street right-of-way and adjacent sidewalks are inadequate
and the subject site attracts crime and other unwanted activities. The Report
concludes that the subject site is not suitable for development as envisioned without
substantial financial investment to address these significant issues.

Creation of the 69th & Thomas Redevelopment Area will assist the Developer to
create a new affordable housing development that will address the slum and blight
conditions on the subject site and the adjacent street and sidewalk infrastructure.


Designation as a "Redevelopment Area" allows for the City to continue working with
the Developer to facilitate a variety of revitalization measures, which include blight
elimination, special development funding mechanisms, and to work on a
Redevelopment Area Plan for the subject site to provide for future revitalization
efforts when the Developer builds the affordable housing project. A Redevelopment
Area Plan adopted by City Council is required prior to condemnation of any private
property for economic development purposes pursuant to state law; however, no
condemnation action is proposed as part of this Redevelopment Area for the
subject site.

In order to assess current conditions on the subject site, data was collected on the
current land use, building and site conditions, neighborhood maintenance
ordinance, and incidence of crime and fire for the subject site and larger area. After
analysis of the Report, the Planning and Development Department concurs with the
Report's conclusions that the following applies to the subject site:

1) There is defective or inadequate street layout;
2) There is faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness;
3) There is obsolete subdivision platting;
4) There is deterioration of the site and its improvements;
5) There are unsafe and unsanitary conditions that relate to the condition of the
property; and,
6) There are conditions that endanger life or property by fire, criminal activity and
other causes.

These factors impede the provision of affordable housing accommodations,
constitute an economic and social liability, and negatively impact the public health,
safety, morals, or welfare as present on the subject site. Individually or in
combination, these conditions substantially impair or arrest the redevelopment of
the subject site and sound growth of the City of Phoenix. These factors support the
findings that one or more blighted conditions exist on the subject site and the
redevelopment is in the interest of the public health, safety, morals, or welfare of the
City.

The Planning and Development Department recommends that the City Council
approve a resolution for the 69th & Thomas Redevelopment Area as proposed:
declaring the findings as necessary for the Planning and Development Department
to assist the Developer in writing a Redevelopment Area Plan to address
development of the subject site. The planning process for the Redevelopment Area



will include a public hearing as required by state law. All property owners within the
Redevelopment Area will be notified of the hearing. After Council adoption of the
Plan, the City may request authorization to issue a request for development
proposals for the area.

Location
The area is located at the southwest corner of 69th Avenue and Thomas Road
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning
and Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION



RESOLUTION


A RESOLUTION FINDING THE EXISTENCE OF A BLIGHTED
AREA IN THE CITY OF PHOENIX AND DECLARING THE
NECESSITY FOR THE 69TH & THOMAS REDEVELOPMENT
AREA.


WHEREAS, the provisions of Arizona Revised Statutes § 36-1471 et seq.,
provide for redevelopment of areas within municipalities; and

WHEREAS, such statutes require certain findings be made by the
governing body of a municipality prior to the exercise of the powers granted hereby; and

WHEREAS, at the southwest corner of 69th Avenue and Thomas Road a
comprehensive study of the site’s current land use, building and neighborhood
maintenance ordinance, and incidence of fire and crime was conducted and compiled in
the 69th & Thomas Redevelopment Study Area report

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PHOENIX as follows:

SECTION 1. The Council finds that the following blight conditions are

present, either singly or in combination, on a predominance of the site:

a. There are unsafe and unsanitary conditions that relate to the

condition of the property on the site;

b. There is a dominance of defective or inadequate street layout within

the site;

-1- Resolution

c. There is a faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility

or usefulness;

d. There are improper or obsolete subdivision platting; and,

e. There are conditions, that endanger life or property by fire, criminal

activity and other causes;

f. That there is deterioration of sites and other improvements.

These factors retard the provision of housing accommodations, constitute an

economic and social liability, and are a menace to the public health, safety, morals or

welfare in their present state and use. Individually or in combination, these conditions

substantially impair or arrest the redevelopment of the site and impact sound growth of

the City of Phoenix.

SECTON 2. The Council finds that the redevelopment of the site is

necessary in the interest of public health, safety morals or welfare of the residents of

the City of Phoenix.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 5th day of March 2025.



MAYOR




ATTEST:


____________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk




-2- Resolution


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney



By:___________________________
___________________________



REVIEWED BY:


______________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




-3- Resolution


ATTACHMENT B




DESERT SKY
APARTMENTS

REDEVELOPMENT REPORT




February 2025 Prepared By:
ABLA
310 E. Rio Salado Pkwy.
Tempe, AZ 85281
Table of Contents
1. REDEVELOPMENT REPORT 3
1.1 INTRODUCTION 3
1.2 BACKGROUND 3
1.3 LAND USE & PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 6
1.4 CURRENT SITE CONDITION 9
1.5 APPLICABILITY OF STATE STATUES 11
1.5.1 REDEVELOPMENT STATUE ARS 36-1471 ET SEQ. (THE “ACT”) 11
1.6 BLIGHTED CONDITIONS FINDINGS 13
1.6.1 INADEQUATE STREET LAYOUT (ARS 36-1471.2.A) 13
1.6.2 FAULTY LOT LAYOUT IN RELATION TO SIZE, ADEQUACY, ACCESSIBILITY OR USEFULNESS (ARS 36-1471.2.B) 13
1.6.3 UNSANITARY OR UNSAFE CONDITIONS (ARS 36-1471.2.C) 15
1.6.4 DETERIORATION OF SITE OR OTHER IMPROVEMENTS (ARS 36-1471.2.D) 18
1.6.5 IMPROPER OR OBSOLETE SUBDIVISION PLATTING (ARS 36-1471.2.H) 21
1.6.6 THE EXISTENCE OF CONDITIONS THAT ENDANGER LIFE OR PROPERTY BY FIRE AND OTHER CAUSES (ARS 36-1471.2.I) 21
1.7 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT/PLAN FINDINGS 24
1.8 SLUM CONDITIONS FINDINGS 24
1.8.1 PREDOMINANCE OF RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS OR IMPROVEMENTS ON SITE WHICH ARE
DILAPIDATED, DETERIORATED, AGING OR OBSOLESCENT (ARS 36-1471.2.A) 24
1.8.2 PUBLIC SAFETY AND WELFARE ARE THREATENED BECAUSE OF THE DILAPIDATED, DETERIORATED, AGING OR
OBSOLESCENT IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY (ARS 36-1471.2.B) 25
1.9 ADDITIONAL BENEFIT  27
1.10 CONCLUSIONS 28




1. REDEVELOPMENT REPORT
1.1 Introduction
The NRP Group (the “Developer”) is in escrow to acquire approximately 9.94 acres (the “Site”)
located Phoenix, Arizona (the “City”). The Site faces numerous physical and public safety
challenges that have hindered its redevelopment. The surrounding areas included in this
report are characterized by inadequate street right-of-way and poorly maintained pedestrian
sidewalks adjacent to the Site, along with prevalent crime and a noticeable homeless presence.
As it stands, the Site is not suitable for development without substantial financial investment
to address these significant issues.

The third-party analysis of existing conditions (the “Report”) prepared by ABLA, LLC (“ABLA”)
aims to identify the presence of “Blighted” or “Slum Conditions” as defined by Arizona’s
Redevelopment Statue; Arizona Revised Statue (“ARS”) 36-1471 et seq. (the “Act”). This analysis
is crucial in determining whether the proposed Site, can be designated a “Redevelopment Area”.

1.2 Background
The Site is approximately 9.94 acres and is located on the southwest corner of North 69th
Avenue and West Thomas Road, see Exhibit 1.2: Vicinity Map. It is bordered to the north by
West Thomas Road, to the east by North 69th Avenue, and to the south and west by an existing
single-family residential subdivisions. The northern boundary of the Site includes a portion of
the right-of-way along West Thomas Road, while the eastern boundary includes a portion of the
right-of-way along North 69th Avenue. These roadways provide essential public infrastructure,
including sidewalks, landscape area, and pavement for vehicular access. However, both
rights-of-way have experienced significant neglect over the years, with visible deterioration
that poses challenges for pedestrians and vehicles alike. Historical records indicate that
West Thomas Road has existed since at least 1997, but its current condition reflects a lack of
upkeep and functionality.
In the early 1900’s, the Site was established as a farmstead in what was then a predominantly
agricultural land in Phoenix. By 1936, the Site included a residence but was primarily composed
of agriculture fields with an irrigation ditch along the northern boundary, extending to the
eastern boundary in 1954. Historical aerial photographs show that by 1979 the southern portion
of the Site began to be overrun with trees and brush. By 2002, the growth continued to spread
northward, and starting in 2005, trees began to grow on the west portion of the Site. This
vegetative growth has persisted up to the present day, resulting in the Site being overgrown
with trees, shrubs and grasses, with the existing structures now in a state of deterioration.




Desert Sky Apartments 3
During the 1970s and 1980s, the surrounding area developed and modernized along with
the City, leaving the infill property too small for single-family development and too isolated
for commercial development. Most of the area now consists of single-family residential
neighborhoods. The last multi-development in the area was constructed in the past fifteen
(15) years; prior to that, the multi-family developments within proximity to the Site date back
to the 1980s.




Desert Sky Apartments 4
1.3 Land Use & Proposed Development
The Site, or subject property, was designated Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac through the City of
Phoenix General Plan Land Use Designation. However, due to the Site’s irregular shape and
limited size, the subject property is not suitable for single-family development, despite its
long-term zoning of R1-6 (Single-Family Residential). Recognizing the potential for a more
effective land use, the Developer has submitted an application to amend the General Plan and
rezone the Site to R-4, enabling the development of a three (3) story garden-style multi-family
residential community. This request was approved on January 15, 2025 (Case GPA-MV-1-24-7
and Z-53-24-7). With limited availability of multi-family housing in the area, the Site presents
a unique opportunity to introduce new, modern, high-quality apartments that will expand
housing options and revitalize the neighborhood.

Desert Sky Apartments is envisioned as a multi-family residential development consisting
of two hundred eighty-eight (288) residential units distributed across nine (9) three-story
buildings. This project aims to provide attainable rental options compared to competitors
along the Loop 101 corridor, with rental rates designed to offer exceptional value and address
any potential challenges posed by the Blight and Slum Condition surrounding the Site. The
redevelopment of the Site is particularly significant given the broader conditions of neglect in
the area, including deteriorating infrastructure and minimal vegetation along nearby roadways.

The redevelopment will include a significant portion of workforce housing, catering to the
needs of moderate-income households. The new modern construction will meet the demand
for contemporary rental units, which are limited in the immediate area. Beyond addressing
the housing demand, the development has the opportunity to revitalize the neighborhood by
enhancing the local housing market and addressing broader economic and aesthetic challenges
in the community. Please see the Redevelopment Plan for additional details.

The Site is surrounded by federally designated Qualified Census Tracts (“QCT”), indicating the
area faces economic challenges as detailed in Exhibit 1.3: Federally Qualified Census Tract.
This designation highlights the necessity for redevelopment to address the Slum Conditions
that affect both the Site and its surrounding community. As of 2021, the median household
income for the Site is $48,000, and only eight percent (8%) of the surrounding population has
attained a bachelor's degree. The redevelopment of the Site has the potential to contribute
to the increased education levels and household income in the area, addressing some of the
challenges tied to the surrounding area QCT designation.




Desert Sky Apartments 6
A residential market analysis conducted by Noell Consulting Group identified the Site as being
located within a high crime area, where property crime is more prevalent than violent crime.
These conditions contribute to the Blight and Slum Conditions of the area, necessitating extra
security precautions. To mitigate these issues, the development will incorporate comprehensive
safety measures, including a gated community, security cameras, and potential on-site
security personnel.

As the Loop 101 corridor (west of the Site) continues to experience growth in affluence due
to the new developments, this trend is extending eastward into the Maryvale Village area.
Desert Sky Apartments presents a timely and attractive option for prospective renters in this
evolving market. Future residents will benefit from access to major employment centers such
as Downtown Phoenix and Tempe, as well as local hubs like Glendale and Estrella Village/
Tolleson. This strategic location near major highways ensures easy commutes and accessibility,
enhancing the overall appeal and practicality of the development.




Desert Sky Apartments 7
1.4 Current Site Condition
ABLA conducted a visual assessment of the subject property on August 8th, 2024.

Formerly agricultural land, a majority of the Site is undeveloped and predominantly overgrown
with mesquite trees surrounding a deteriorating single-family residence, barns, animal pens,
and outbuildings. The Site is enclosed by a six (6) foot tall chain link fence with locked gates
providing access from West Thomas Road and North 69th Avenue. The gate on West Thomas
Road allows entry to the private residence via a dirt drive. Due to the overgrown mesquite
trees, scattered weeds and grasses, there are few and limited walkways on the Site.
Septic systems are located near the northwest and southwest corners of the Site. The
northeast corner contains two (2) irrigation control boxes, with deteriorating concrete-lined
irrigation ditches and soil berms directing irrigation water around the residence and across the
remaining areas of the subject property. A possible hand-pump water well location, identified
by a concrete slab with an apparent well cover, was observed on the western exterior of the
pump house. Six (6) fifty-five (55) gallon drums of heating oil, nearly empty, were found within
the structures, reportedly used for heating.

The subject property has significant trash and dumping around its exterior, negatively
impacting both the Site and the adjacent neighborhood. The fence line is strewn with liquor
and beer bottles, trash, debris, clothing, and tires. Single-family homes adjacent to the Site
have fallen victim to graffiti, trash, broken glass and vandalism. Additionally, there is a strong
stench from the dead animals and trash surrounding the Site, contributing to the unsanitary
and unsafe conditions.
The deteriorating infrastructure along West Thomas Road, which borders the Site to the
north, and North 69th Avenue, which borders the Site to the east, exacerbates these issues.
The roadways are cracked and in poor condition, with sidewalks that are broken, uneven, and
in some places, missing entirely. These conditions create hazards for pedestrians and make
the area less accessible. The existing sidewalk along North 69th Avenue abuts the walls of
adjacent homes, which are marked by graffiti, neglect, and poorly executed repairs, further
contributing to the unsightly appearance of the area. Trash and debris frequently overflow
from the Site onto the sidewalk, and minimal landscaping along the roadway has resulted in
large dirt patches that attract more debris.




Desert Sky Apartments 9
From the visual assessment on August 8th and the prevalent trash, debris, and overall condition
of the Site, it has been documented that homeless and transient individuals frequently
loiter along West Thomas Road and North 69th Avenue, moving between nearby properties,
including the Site. Alcove conditions along the adjacent residential walls create areas that
encourage the accumulation of trash and debris and provide temporary spaces for loitering
or encampments. This activity not only contributes to the unsanitary and unsafe environment
but also negatively impacts the surrounding neighborhoods.

These combined issues—the condition of the Site itself, the surrounding roadway infrastructure,
and the transient activity along Thomas Road—underscore a broader pattern of neglect
and deterioration that poses challenges to public safety and highlights the urgent need for
redevelopment, see Figures A-D for current conditions of the Site and surrounding area.




Figure A: TRASH & DUMPING Figure B: OVERGROWN MESQUITE TREES




Figure C: NORTH 69TH AVENUE ROW Figure D: DETERIORATING SIDEWALKS




Desert Sky Apartments 10
1.5 Applicability of State Statues
1.5.1 Redevelopment Statue ARS 36-1471 et seq. (the “Act”)
The Act provides Arizona municipalities with the authority to declare a property of an area
a “Redevelopment Area”. Typically, the powers granted to a municipality by this statue are
multi-faceted and provide guidance to condemn and dispose of Slum and Blight properties
over large sections of land consisting of multiple property owners and land uses. In this case,
however, the objective of this declaration is to create a single purpose Redevelopment Area,
subject to a single property and a mix of land uses. The establishment of a Redevelopment
Area may assist in mitigating the costs of remediation to the Slum or Blighted conditions.
Prior to establishing a Redevelopment Area, the statue provides that a jurisdiction must make
a legislative “Finding of Necessity” demonstrating that a Slum and/or Blighted area exists,
per the definitions included in the Act. In order to identify areas of “Blight” or “Slum”, the Act
includes criteria for what constitutes a finding of Blight or Slum.

For the record, the property owner is aware of this request and has expressed support for
the redevelopment effort.

1.5.1.1 ARS 36-1473. Finding of necessity by local governing body
A. A municipality shall not exercise any of the powers conferred on municipalities by this
article until its local governing body adopts a resolution by two-thirds vote finding both
of the following:
1. One (1) or more Slum or Blighted Areas exist in the municipality.
2. The redevelopment of that area or areas is necessary in the interest of the public
health, safety, morals, or welfare of the residents of the municipality.
B. A municipality must notify the owner of real property that is within the boundaries of
a proposed Redevelopment Area of the time, date and location of a public meeting
concerning the findings. The municipality must provide this notice by first-class mail
to the address stated on the most recent records of the County Assessor.




Desert Sky Apartments 11
1.5.1.2 ARS 36-1471 Definitions
1. “Blighted Area” means an area, other than a Slum Area, where sound municipal
growth and the provision of housing accommodations is substantially retarded or
arrested in a predominance of the properties by any of the following:
a. A dominance of defective or inadequate street layout.
b. Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility or usefulness.
c. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions.
d. Deterioration of site or other improvements.
e. Diversity of ownership.
f. Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land.
g. Defective or unusual conditions of title.
h. Improper or obsolete subdivision platting.
i. The existence of conditions that endanger life or property by fire and other causes.
2. “Slum Area” means an area in which both of the following are true:
a. There is a predominance of buildings or improvements, whether residential or
non-residential.
b. The public health, safety, or welfare is threated because of any of the following:
i. Dilapidated, deteriorated, aging or obsolescent buildings or improvements.
ii. The inadequate provision for ventilation, light, air, sanitation or open spaces.
iii. Overcrowding.
iv. The existence of conditions that endanger life or property by fire and other
causes.




Desert Sky Apartments 12
1.6 Blighted Conditions Findings
1.6.1 Inadequate Street Layout (ARS 36-1471.2.a)
The current street layout is inadequate as there is no existing paved (all weather) access to
the Site, as shown in Figures E and F. To facilitate development, substantial improvements
will be necessary, including curb cuts, sidewalk repair/installation, and overall roadway
improvements. These improvements are essential to create safe and efficient access into the
Site, ensuring it meets modern urban standards and provides the necessary infrastructure
for the proposed development. The lack of these basic elements underscores the need for
significant upgrades to support the project’s success and integration into the surrounding
community.




Figure E: THOMAS ROAD ACCESS GATE Figure F: 69TH AVENUE ACCESS GATE


1.6.2 Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility or usefulness (ARS
36-1471.2.b)
As shown in Figures G-I, the Site’s irregular shape severely restricts the layout options for
single-family homes. The configuration and size of the parcels make it challenging to design
a functional and aesthetically pleasing residential neighborhood with adequate street access
and utility placements. Forcing a single-family residential neighborhood within the Site’s 9.94
acres would limit the necessary infrastructure and amenities needed to attract homeowners.
The constrained space would not support essential community features such as parks and
recreational facilities, which are critical for creating a desirable and vibrant neighborhood.
The limitations contribute to the Site’s Blight and Slum Conditions, as the lack of proper
development planning results in an underutilized and neglected area. The inefficient land
use and absence of community amenities deter investment and development, perpetuating
the cycle of decay and disrepair.


Desert Sky Apartments 13
The Developer intends to integrate the multi-family development with minimal impacts to the
surrounding single-family homes. By pushing the buildings toward the public street frontages,
significant buffers will be created to preserve the privacy of adjacent residences. The strategic
placement will also enhance the streetscape and facilitate pedestrian-friendly environments.




Figure G: AERIAL PERSPECTIVE OF THE SITE FACING NORTHWEST




Figure H: AERIAL PERSPECTIVE OF THE SITE FACING SOUTHWEST




Figure I: AERIAL PERSPECTIVE OF THE SITE FACING NORTHEAST


Desert Sky Apartments 14
1.6.3 Unsanitary or Unsafe Conditions (ARS 36-1471.2.c)
The Site has become an eye-sore and dumping ground within the community. As illustrated
in Figures J–U, the community, and/or homeless and transient individuals, have resorted
to discarding items such as couches, tires, clothing, children’s toys, and various other trash
items both outside and inside the Site’s chain link fence. Additionally, the chain link fence has
been patched in multiple locations where previous damage along North 69th Avenue created
easy access points for the nearby homeless and transient population. These conditions not
only contribute to the Site’s unsightly appearance but also pose serious health and safety
hazards for the community.

The accumulation of debris and presence of discarded items create breeding grounds for
pests and vermin, which can lead to infestations and the spread of diseases. Numerous dead
animals were found surrounding the Site, causing a terrible odor the affects both the Site and
adjacent homes. Defection, soiled clothing, beer bottles, and spoiled or half-eaten food litter
the area, further contributing to the unsanitary conditions. The presence of broken glass,
rusted metal, and exposed electrical components pose serious injury risks.

These issues are exacerbated by the deteriorating conditions along West Thomas Road and
North 69th Avenue. The pavement across West Thomas Road is cracked and sidewalks are
broken, uneven, or in some areas entirely missing, creating hazards for pedestrians. North
69th Avenue, in its current state, is only developed as a half right-of-way. This inadequate
roadway development has left pavement cracked and crumbling along its edge adjacent to
the Site. Furthermore, due to the incomplete development of the right-of-way, there is one (1)
sidewalk on the east side of North 69th Avenue. Residents to the east of the Site are not only
forced to contend with the unsanitary and unsightly conditions of the area but also experience
these issues encroaching onto the sidewalk and their homes. Trash and debris continue to
accumulate in landscape areas, sidewalks, and the streets both along West Thomas Road and
North 69th Avenue, further degrading the environment and intensifying the need for intervention.

Inside of the Site, trash, beer bottles, tires, and other debris are scattered throughout, along
with fallen trees adding to the general disarray. The damaged fencing allows for unauthorized
entry, increasing the risk of vandalism, theft, and illegal activities on the Site. These conditions
are exacerbated by the unsanitary and unsafe environment created by defecation, dead
animals, and soiled clothing surrounding the Site.




Desert Sky Apartments 15
In response to escalating safety concerns, neighbors adjacent to the Site have taken to adding
additional security measures. These measures include the installation of security cameras
and the extension of backyard walls with chain link fencing to increase height and deter
unauthorized access. These heightened security efforts underscore the perceived and real
threats posed by the deteriorating and unsecured condition of the Site, which has become
a magnet for trespassing, vandalism, and other illegal activities. The fact that residents feel
compelled to fortify their homes indicates the severity of the unsafe conditions surrounding
the Site, further highlighting the need for intervention and remediation.
The unsanitary and unsafe conditions, both within the Site and in the surrounding area,
underscore the Blight and Slum Conditions of the subject property and emphasize the urgent
need for redevelopment. Redeveloping the Site would not only remove the existing hazards
but also transform the surrounding area into a safe, clean, and vibrant community. Addressing
these issues is crucial to improving public health and safety, as well as enhancing the overall
quality of life for the surrounding residents.




Figure J: TRASH AND DEBRIS Figure K: SOILED CLOTHING




Figure L: ILLEGAL DUMPING - FURNITURE Figure M: ILLEGAL DUMPING - COUCH


Desert Sky Apartments 16
Figure N: BROKEN BEER BOTTLE Figure O: EXPOSED ELECTRICAL




Figure P: DEAD ANIMAL Figure Q: NEIGHBORING WALLS




Figure R: ADJACENT ELECTRICAL BOX Figure S: ADDITIONAL SECURITY FENCING




Figure T: NORTH 69TH AVENUE Figure U: WEST THOMAS ROAD


Desert Sky Apartments 17
1.6.4 Deterioration of site or other improvements (ARS 36-1471.2.d)
The existing residence and structures on the Site are in a state of deterioration, as shown in
Figures V-AA. Figure V depicts a dilapidated residence surrounded by overgrown vegetation.
The house shows significant signs of wear and neglect, with peeling paint, damaged and
boarded up windows, and a visibly damaged roof with poorly patched sections, which can
lead to water infiltration and further structural damage. Various items, such as an old washing
machine and a dog house, are strewn around the exterior, adding to the unsightly appearance.
The general area around the house appears untidy, with scattered debris and unmaintained
pathways, contributing to the overall sense of neglect.




Figure V: DILAPIDATED RESIDENCE

Figure W shows a portion of the Site with multiple structures. The older wooden shed shows
signs of significant wear and possible rot. Like much of the Site, the area surrounding the
buildings are overgrown with unkempt vegetation. Visible debris are scattered throughout the
Site. Further back in the image there is a structure with a falling, rusted roof being overcome
by the vegetation.




Figure W: UNOCCUPIED STRUCTURES



Desert Sky Apartments 18
In addition to the isolated areas above, Figure X shows are broader portion of the Site where
numerous buildings, including sheds and barns, are in sever disrepair. Roofs are rusted, walls
are dilapidated, and the overall condition suggests long-term neglect and lack of maintenance.
Various items of debris, such as old, rusted troughs contribute to the overall appearance of
neglect and unsanitary conditions.




Figure X: AERIAL PERSPECTIVE UNOCCUPIED STRUCTURES

The exterior portion of the Site, identified in Figures Y-AA, exhibit further signs of deterioration.
The chain link fence has been tampered with at multiple locations, compromising its integrity.
Along North 69th Avenue, the pavement edge adjacent to the Site is crumbing, resulting in the
formation of potholes and the encroachment of dirt and debris from the Site onto the road.
The Site property lines are overwhelmingly covered in trash and debris, highlighting the lack
of maintenance and care. Additionally, the irrigation ditch lining Site is damaged and would
require significant repairs to restore its functionality.
Similarly, West Thomas Road, which borders the Site to the north, suffers from cracked
pavement and broken, uneven sidewalks. These deteriorated conditions create hazards for
pedestrians, particularly those with mobility issues, and reinforce the unsanitary and unsafe
appearance of the surrounding area. The lack of a landscape buffer along both roadways
exacerbates the visual and physical hazards, as sparse vegetation and dirt patches become
collection points for trash and debris.



Desert Sky Apartments 19
Figure Y: TAMPTERED CHAIN LINK FENCE




Figure Z: DETERIORATING PAVEMENT EDGE




Figure AA: DETERIORATING CONCRETE IRRIGATION DITCH


Desert Sky Apartments 20
The pervasive and deterioration of infrastructure and the encroachment of dirt and debris from
the Site into the adjacent streets and homes highlight a broader pattern of neglect. This neglect
discourages investment and development, trapping the Site and surrounding area in a cycle
of decline. The extensive disrepair, combined with the dilapidated buildings and accumulated
debris, creates a hazardous environment, posing risks of injury from collapsing structures
and exposure to unsanitary conditions. The overgrown vegetation further exacerbates the
problem by providing a habitat for pests and making the area look abandoned and unkempt.

These deteriorating conditions underscore the urgent need for redevelopment. Revitalizing
the Site would not only eliminate the existing hazards but also transform the area into a clean,
safe, and appealing community, fostering renewed investment and improving the quality of
life for nearby residents.

1.6.5 Improper or obsolete subdivision platting (ARS 36-1471.2.h)
The subject property consists of five (5) separate parcels, which will need to be consolidated
into a single parcel to facilitate proper plotting and development. This lack of cohesive plotting
presents significant challenges for effective land use and development planning, hindering
the potential for creating a well-structured and functional residential area. The existing
conditions, characterized by the disjointed land division, contribute to the Blight and Slum
Conditions of the Site. The fragmented parcels lead to inefficient land use, attracting illegal
dumping and general neglect. The absence of a unified development plan exacerbates these
issues, creating an environment that is unsafe and unattractive. Consolidating these parcels
is essential to rectify the disjointed land division, streamline development processes, and
optimize the use of the Site, ultimately addressing the Blight and Slum Conditions.

1.6.6 The existence of conditions that endanger life or property by fire and other
causes (ARS 36-1471.2.i)
The Site is predominantly overgrown with mesquite trees, shrubs, and grasses. This uncontrolled
vegetation increases the risk of fire, providing ample fuel that could lead to rapid fire spread,
potentially impacting the surrounding single-family homes. The overgrown state also harbors
pests and poses a general safety hazard.

In addition to the vegetation, the presence of six (6) 55-gallon drums of heating oil within
structures, although nearly empty, still poses a significant fire hazard. The Site also contains
old, rusted metal and wooden structures, further adding to the combustible materials on the
Site, heightening the fire risk.



Desert Sky Apartments 21
As noted in Section 1.6.4, several buildings are in severe disrepair. This deterioration
compromises their structural integrity, increasing the risk of collapse and injury. Damaged
roofs, in particular, can lead to water infiltration, which can create potential hazards such as
mold growth.

The unmaintained pathways and general clutter exacerbate the risk of trips, falls and other
accidents. Additionally, the inadequate and damaged fencing surrounding the Site allows for
unauthorized access, increasing the likelihood of fire and other safety hazards.

These conditions not only create an immediate danger to life and property but also contribute
to the Blight and Slum Conditions of the subject property. The high fire risk due to overgrown
vegetation and combustible materials makes the area unsafe for current and potential future
residents on and surrounding the Site. The deteriorating structures pose risks of collapse,
which can result in serious injuries or fatalities. Moreover, the presence of hazardous materials
like heating oil drums further amplifies the potential for catastrophic events.

Inadequate maintenance and the over dilapidation of the Site fosters a hazardous and unsightly
environment, discouraging investment and continuing a cycle of neglect and deterioration.
The compromised fencing increases the risk of unauthorized access, which not only raises
the chance of accidents but also promotes illegal activities, exacerbating unsafe conditions.




Figure BB: OVERGROWN VEGETATION




Desert Sky Apartments 22
Figure CC: INADEQUATE AND DAMAGED FENCING




Figure DD: DETERIORATING STRUCTURES




Figure EE: DETERIORATING STRUCTURES, HEATING OIL DRUMS, AND ELECTRICAL POLE


Desert Sky Apartments 23
1.7 Redevelopment Project/Plan Findings
The proposed redevelopment for the Site meets the criteria for a “Redevelopment Area” as
outline in ARS 36.1471.17(a). This project involves the acquisition of Slum or Blighted Areas with
the intent to redevelop the Site into a stable and sustainable community, effectively preventing
the reoccurrence of Blighted conditions in the area (ARS 36.1471.17(a)i). The redevelopment
will involve the removal of deteriorated infrastructure on the Site, addressing multiple public
health and safety threats while reconstructing functional infrastructure and utilities that
will benefit both the public and surrounding neighborhood (ARS 36.1471.17(a)ii). Moreover,
the redevelopment will provide public benefits by making land available for residential and
recreational uses (ARS 36.1471.17(a)iii). Incidental planning, survey engineering and design
work has already begun in order to prepare a suitable Redevelopment Plan for the area.

1.8 Slum Conditions Findings
1.8.1 Predominance of residential and non-residential buildings or improvements on
site which are dilapidated, deteriorated, aging or obsolescent (ARS 36-1471.2.a)
The Site is characterized by a predominance of residential and unoccupied buildings that
are in various states of disrepair, significantly contributing to the overall Slum Conditions
of the area. The structures on the Site, many of where were constructed in the 1930s, have
not been updated or properly maintained over time, resulting in a severely dilapidated state.
The residential buildings, in particular, exhibit numerous signs of neglect, with damaged and
boarded-up windows, a visible deteriorating roof with poorly patched sections, and peeling
paint that exposes the underlying materials to further decay. The broken roof gutters, cracked
pathways, and dirt driveway all point to a lack of maintenance, while the electrical box and
exposed wires present significant safety hazards. The broken and bent chain link fencing
surrounding the Site further emphasizes the neglect and contributes to the overall sense of
decay.
The unoccupied buildings on the Site are in similarly poor condition. The structures,
constructed from materials that have not withstood the test of time, are now visibly rotting and
crumbling. Many of the roofs are rusted and weathered, having lost their protective coatings
and becoming increasingly vulnerable to the elements. The walls, weathered and peeling,
indicate a severe lack of structural integrity, making these buildings particularly hazardous.
Overgrown vegetation surrounds these dilapidated structures, further highlighting the Site's
neglect and contributing to the area’s Blight.




Desert Sky Apartments 24
These conditions collectively reflect a broader issue of Slum Conditions on the Site, where the
predominance of aging, dilapidated, and obsolete structures poses a significant challenge to
the Site's viability and potential for development. The deteriorating state of these buildings
not only detracts from the visual appeal of the area but also poses serious safety hazards,
reinforcing the urgent need for redevelopment or substantial restoration efforts. Without
profound remediation, the Site will continue to decline, posing a threat to public safety and
the overall welfare of the community, and perpetuating the cycle of neglect and decay that
characterizes the Site.

1.8.2 Public safety and welfare are threatened because of the dilapidated,
deteriorated, aging or obsolescent improvements on the property (ARS 36-1471.2.b)
The Site is extremely unsanitary and unsafe, littered with trash, debris, discarded furniture,
children’s toys, old tires, broken glass, and more. These conditions create a hazardous
environment, exacerbated by the presence of dead animals and soiled clothing scattered
throughout the area. The overgrown plant material further increases the risk of fire, particularly
given the presence of six (6) fifty-five (55) gallon drums, previously containing heating oil,
stored on the Site. These drums, combined with the dry vegetation and state of deterioration
of the buildings, provide ample fuel for a potential fire, significantly heightening the threat to
the surrounding community.

The cracked and uneven sidewalks and pavement along the edges of the Site create additional
safety hazards for pedestrians, significantly increasing the risk of trips and falls. Furthermore,
tampered electrical boxes and deteriorating infrastructure near the Site pose additional
safety risks, including the threat of electrical shock or fire. Aging wooden electrical poles
show visible signs or wear and lack of maintenance, creating unsafe conditions increasing
the potential for fire hazards.
The damaged chain link fence surrounding the Site has been compromised, allowing homeless
and transient individuals easy access into the subject property. These individuals frequently
occupy alcoves and hidden spaces near the Site, using them for loitering, illegal dumping, and
make shift encampments. This activity exacerbates the unsafe environment and contributes
to the Blighted appearance of the area. The presence of illegal dumping, including soiled
clothing, spoiled food, and other hazardous waste, further highlights the unsanitary and unsafe
conditions surrounding the Site.




Desert Sky Apartments 25
The structural integrity of the buildings on the Site is also a major concern, with the risk of
collapse posing a direct danger to public safety and anyone illegally trespassing. The homeless
and transient individuals surrounding the Site have prompted surrounding homeowners to
implement enhanced security measures, including the installation of cameras, additional
fencing, and gated windows and doors, as they attempt to protect themselves from the threats
emanating from the Site. These defensive actions by neighboring residents underscore the
widespread fear and insecurity caused by the deteriorating conditions, which have initiated
a cycle of neglect and decay in the community.
The pervasive neglect of the Site and its surrounding infrastructure poses ongoing threats to
public safety and welfare. Without immediate intervention, these hazardous conditions will
continue to worsen, reinforcing the Blight and Slum Conditions of the area. Redeveloping the
Site is critical to restoring safety, addressing the current risks, and improving the quality of
life for the surrounding community.




Desert Sky Apartments 26
1.9 Additional Benefit
The proposed redevelopment project, Desert Sky Apartments, will greatly benefit its community
through a continual increase in education, income, and safety levels. The development includes
widening North 69th Avenue to a full street, enhancing local infrastructure and accessibility.
Desert Sky Apartments is anticipated to attract young professionals working in the Downtown
core, Westgate District, Luke Air Force Base, Dignity Health, Banner Health and the nearby
Amazon facility. The central location of the development offers a convenient midpoint for
households with split commutes, making it an attractive option for diverse working professionals.

Since 2011, there has been a notable increase in education and income levels on the western
side of Phoenix. As the area grows, this trend is expected to extend eastward, attracting people
seeking proximity to the Westgate District and Downtown Phoenix. Desert Sky Apartments
will cater to this growing demand by introducing a mix of housing types and densities to the
area, addressing a significant gap in the current housing market.

Furthermore, the development will incorporate comprehensive safety measures, including
a gated community, security cameras and the potential on-site security personnel. These
measures will enhance the area’s safety and security, discourage criminal activity and
foster a more secure and stable environment. By reducing crime and improving safety, the
development will benefit both its residents and the surrounding community, contributing to
the overall revitalization and economic growth of the area.




Desert Sky Apartments 27
1.10 Conclusions
Blight and Slum Conditions create constraints that are prohibitive to development. Desert
Sky Apartments represents a crucial step toward revitalizing a Blighted Area. After analyzing
the Site in terms of inadequate size, unsanitary and unsafe condition, site deterioration, and
conditions that endanger life and property by fire and other causes, we find that the Site meets
the criteria set forth in the Act in establishment of a “Blighted” Area. Additionally, the Site
generally aligns with the intent of the Act regarding the establishment of a “Slum” Area. This
visual assessment highlights the urgent need for redevelopment to address these significant
issues and transform the Site into a valuable asset for the community.

Transforming this 9.94-acre property into a modern, high-quality multi-family residential
development, will address the current challenges and provide numerous benefits to the
community. By addressing hazardous conditions, improving infrastructure, and introducing
commercial opportunities, a redevelopment plan would enhance public safety, elevate the
quality of life for residents, and stimulate economic growth. This comprehensive approach to
revitalizing the Site will transform the subject property into thriving community asset, paving
the way for sustainable development and long-term prosperity.




Desert Sky Apartments 28

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

83 item(s)