← Back to meetings

Meeting City Council Formal Meeting-4/3/2024 complete

2024-04-03 · Formal

Items: 74

City Council Formal Meeting

View on Agenda Online ↗


Synced: 2026-05-28 03:37 AZ

Item text
For Approval or Correction, the Minutes of the Formal Meeting on July 1, 2021

Summary
This item transmits the minutes of the Formal Meeting of July 1, 2021, for review,
correction and/or approval by the City Council.

The minutes are available for review in the City Clerk Department, 200 W. Washington
St., 15th Floor.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 11



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
For Approval or Correction, the Minutes of the Formal Meeting on Aug. 25, 2021

Summary
This item transmits the minutes of the Formal Meeting of Aug. 25, 2021, for review,
correction and/or approval by the City Council.

The minutes are available for review in the City Clerk Department, 200 W. Washington
St., 15th Floor.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 12



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
For Approval or Correction, the Minutes of the Formal Meeting on Dec. 6, 2023

Summary
This item transmits the minutes of the Formal Meeting of Dec. 6, 2023, for review,
correction and/or approval by the City Council.

The minutes are available for review in the City Clerk Department, 200 W. Washington
St., 15th Floor.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 13



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
to Boards and Commissions

Summary
This item transmits recommendations from the Mayor and Council for appointment or
reappointment to City Boards and Commissions.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Mayor's Office.




ATTACHMENT A




To: City Council Date: April 3, 2024
From: Mayor Kate Gallego

Subject: *REVISED BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS – APPOINTEES

The purpose of this memo is to provide recommendations for appointments to the
following Boards and Commissions:

Development Advisory Board

I recommend the following for reappointment:

Caroline Lobo
Ms. Lobo will serve her second term to expire April 3, 2027.

*ADD: North Gateway Village Planning Committee

Councilwoman Ann O’Brien recommends the following for appointment:

Kylie Kennelly
Ms. Kennelly is a Community Outreach Specialist at HonorHealth and a resident of
District 1. She fills a vacancy for a term to expire November 19, 2025.

North Mountain Village Planning Committee

Vice Mayor Debra Stark recommends the following for appointment:

Heather Garbarino
Ms. Garbarino is a resident of District 3. She will serve a term to expire November 19,
2025.

Sister Cities Commission

I recommend the following for appointment:

Drew Hutchinson




Page 15
Mr. Hutchinson is the Chief Marketing Officer for McCarthy Law PLC and a resident of
District 3. He fills a vacancy for a term to expire April 3, 2027.

Vision Zero Community Advisory Committee

Councilwoman Betty Guardado recommends the following for appointment:

Marco Marcial
Mr. Marcial is the Owner of Maddix Enterprises. He fills a vacancy representing District
5 for a partial term to expire March 1, 2025.

Councilwoman Laura Pastor recommends the following for reappointment:

Ed Hermes
Mr. Hermes will serve his first full term to expire March 1, 2026.

Councilman Kevin Robinson recommends the following for appointment:

Catherine Mulkerin
Ms. Mulkerin is the Owner & CEO of C/M Development & Design. She replaces Jay
Beeber representing District 6 for a term to expire March 1, 2026.

*ADD: Councilman Jim Waring recommends the following for appointment:

Steve Burns
Mr. Burns is the CEO at Duplipack and a resident of District 2. He replaces James
Farley for a term to expire March 1, 2026.

*ADD: Rio Vista Village Planning Committee

Councilwoman Ann O’Brien recommends the following for appointment:

Dino Cotton
Mr. Cotton is the President at Rezeo and a resident of District 1. He fills a vacancy for a
term to expire November 19, 2025.




Page 16



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Barrio Brewing Company Restaurant

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 06070119.

Summary

Applicant
Navayogasingam Thuraisingam, Agent

License Type
Series 6 - Bar

Location
702 W. Deer Valley Road
Zoning Classification: A-1 DVAO
Council District: 1

This request is for an ownership and location transfer of a liquor license for a bar. This
location is currently licensed for liquor sales with a Series 12 - Restaurant, liquor
license and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 20, 2024.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the


Page 17

applicant in the State of Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have held multiple liquor licenses and never had any violations. I plan to serve liquor
always following all rules and regulations set forth by the city and state. Further, I will
ensure these same rules and regulations are followed by management and
employees, who will also receive the necessary and required training to serve liquor.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This will be part of the Deer Valley Airport and provide a great service to both the
airport as an organization, as well as all the passengers that travel to and from
Phoenix via the Deer Valley Airport. This will be an excellent addition to the community,
providing a safe and enjoyable environment to enjoy food and beverage for all
patrons.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment - Barrio Brewing Company Restaurant - Data
Attachment - Barrio Brewing Company Restaurant - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 18
Liquor License Data: BARRIO BREWING COMPANY
RESTAURANT
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Producer 1 1 0

Microbrewery 3 1 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 2 2

Restaurant 12 4 3

Craft Distiller 18 1 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 20.48 17.72

Violent Crimes 12.31 1.77 0.63

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 45 2

Total Violations 78 2



Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

6147001 287 86 29 31

Average 0 61 13 19




Page 19
Liquor License Map: BARRIO BREWING COMPANY RESTAURANT
702 W DEER VALLEY RD




Ü
Date: 2/22/2024
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 20



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Romano's Macaroni Grill #31178

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 273558.

Summary

Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
2949 W. Agua Fria Fwy.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 1

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 15, 2024.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.


Page 21


Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales and service.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Romano's Macaroni Grill is a nationwide restaurant known for it's Italian-American
style dishes in a casual family-friendly atmosphere. Applicant would like to continue to
offer guests 21 and over the opportunity to order alcohol beverages as an incident to
the menu items they enjoy.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment - Romano's Macaroni Grill #31178 - Data
Attachment - Romano's Macaroni Grill #31178 - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 22
Liquor License Data: ROMANO'S MACARONI GRILL
#31178
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 1 1

Liquor Store 9 2 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 3 3

Restaurant 12 8 8


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 104.48 164.54

Violent Crimes 12.31 14.3 27.7
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 45 32

Total Violations 78 52




Page 23
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

6146001 940 88 0 9

6146003 1301 56 0 0

6146004 840 3 7 16

6146005 1209 50 9 3

6146006 953 0 29 0

6164001 1022 80 28 4

6164003 2380 0 5 9

6164004 1106 100 0 0

6164005 576 73 38 9

Average 0 61 13 19




Page 24
Liquor License Map: ROMANO'S MACARONI GRILL #31178
2949 W AGUA FRIA FWY




Ü
Date: 2/16/2024
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 25



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - 76 Gas Station

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 279815.

Summary

Applicant
Yiorgos Makris, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
4121 W. Bell Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 1

This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that sells gas. This
location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an
interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 15, 2024.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of


Page 26

Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have owned and operated more than 30 businesses in my life. Through my
businesses I abide by the law, provide employment to the community and pay all Sales
taxes. I wish to gain this license to open and operate a gas station that will serve the
community it resides in.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“By issuing me a license I will be able to grow and expand the business adding more
jobs to the community.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment - 76 Gas Station - Data
Attachment - 76 Gas Station - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 27
Liquor License Data: 76 GAS STATION
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 2 2

Liquor Store 9 4 3

Beer and Wine Store 10 5 1

Restaurant 12 4 3


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 66.42 111.25

Violent Crimes 12.31 10.24 16.66
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 45 41

Total Violations 78 80




Page 28
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1042251 1242 53 8 9

1042261 949 26 8 11

1042262 1244 92 0 4

1042264 1538 92 7 15

6181001 1795 84 3 7

6183001 1982 94 7 9

6183002 1444 74 0 4

Average 0 61 13 19




Page 29
Liquor License Map: 76 GAS STATION
4121 W BELL RD




Ü
Date: 2/20/2024
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 30



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Compass CBS Foundation

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Tanya Ospitale

Location
300 E. Indian School Road
Council District: 4

Function
Mixer

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
April 11, 2024 - 5:30 p.m. to 8 p.m. / 200 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 31



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Jaynewt's

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 277983.

Summary

Applicant
Georgia Robson, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
300 W. Camelback Road, #2
Zoning Classification: C-2 TOD-1
Council District: 4

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 8, 2024.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes: information about any


Page 32

liquor license violations on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control
and, for locations within the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for
police service within the last 12 months for the address listed.

Otro Cafe (Series 12)
6035 N. 7th St., Phoenix
Calls for police service: 3
Liquor license violations: None

Gallo Blanco Cafe Y Bar (Series 12)
928 E. Pierce St., Phoenix
Calls for police service: 2
Liquor license violations: None

Cobra Arcade (Series 06)
801 N. 2nd St., Phoenix
Calls for police service: 0
Liquor license violations: None

Cobra Arcade (Series 06)
63 E. Congress St. Ste. 109, Tucson
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: In September 2021, a fine of $1,375 was paid for failure to
require applicants, licensees, and employees who serve, sell or furnish liquor to take
training courses; for failure to protect the safety of patrons; and having an employee
intoxicated/disorderly on duty.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I've been in the Hospitality Industry for 36 years. I have an impeccable record running
Restaurants sine 2002 in a managment Role. We implement systems and processes
to ensure safety of guests and employees. I have both title 4 management and Basic
Liquor training.”



Page 33

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We are focused on the food aspect of the restaurant business. Utilizing local
ingredients. The restaurant is inside the Hewton development and they are looking for
a neighborhood kid friendly space. Our sales are mainly from food. Our hours are from
11 am to 9pm (10pm Friday's and Sat)."

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment - Jaynewt's - Data
Attachment - Jaynewt's - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 34
Liquor License Data: JAYNEWT'S
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 1 0

Bar 6 14 3

Beer and Wine Bar 7 11 10

Liquor Store 9 5 3

Beer and Wine Store 10 5 2

Restaurant 12 50 20


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 182.19 251.91

Violent Crimes 12.31 32.05 45.11
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 45 87

Total Violations 79 202




Page 35
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1074002 1009 62 7 16

1074005 661 0 30 77

1075001 758 80 2 3

1075002 1458 74 7 15

1075003 1599 46 15 14

1088021 1456 23 32 31

1088022 435 43 41 19

1089023 1072 28 3 47

1089024 1278 46 9 21

1171001 2126 10 15 10

1171002 703 57 27 12

Average 0 61 13 19




Page 36
Liquor License Map: JAYNEWT'S
300 W CAMELBACK RD




Ü
Date: 2/8/2024
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 37



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Mini Mart 4644

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 266440.

Summary

Applicant
Nitin Gupta, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
4644 N. 12th St.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 4

This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that sells gas. This
location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an
interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 9, 2024.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the


Page 38

State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Mini Mart (Series 10)
3502 W. Thomas Road, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 31
Liquor license violations: None

Kwik Corner 5402 (Series 10)
5402 W. Indian School Road, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 52
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have over 20 years of experience with Convenience Store and Gas Station
businesses ranging from operations to management and during this time have learnt
the ins and outs of handling the liquor license in a responsible manner providing due
care of laws while being mindful of the needs to the community to the best of my
abilities.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“It's a business that is already currently operational. I am purchasing the business from
the current owner who has been serving the local community from this location for
several years and I intend to continue the tradition of ensuring that this business
continues to provide a safe and friendly environment and service to the same local
community while assisting with the safety of the families living in the area by continuing
to follow the liquor laws and safety protocols.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.


Page 39


Attachments
Attachment - Mini Mart 4644 - Data
Attachment - Mini Mart 4644 - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 40
Liquor License Data: MINI MART 4644
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 1 0

Wholesaler 4 2 0

Bar 6 7 2

Beer and Wine Bar 7 5 1

Liquor Store 9 9 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 13 5

Restaurant 12 46 7


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 211.49 167.94

Violent Crimes 12.31 31.76 29.29
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 45 76

Total Violations 78 135




Page 41
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1076013 1748 38 8 17

1076022 1734 54 18 3

1086011 1374 18 29 41

1086012 1402 58 36 46

1086021 790 37 38 22

1086022 1187 11 25 52

1086023 650 23 34 15

1086024 1171 24 9 12

1088022 435 43 41 19

Average 0 61 13 19




Page 42
Liquor License Map: MINI MART 4644
4644 N 12TH ST




Ü
Date: 2/12/2024
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 43



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Quick Corner Liquors

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 09070449.

Summary

Applicant
Jamil Jabbar, Agent

License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store

Location
5121 W. Thomas Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 4

This request is for a location transfer of a liquor license for a liquor store. This location
was not previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This
business is currently under construction with plans to open in May 2024.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 8, 2024.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the


Page 44

State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Jimmies Market (Series 10)
6011 W. Thomas Road, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 11
Liquor license violations: None

Jimmies Market (Series 10)
5127 N. 43rd Ave., Phoenix
Calls for police service: 13
Liquor license violations: None

Quik Corner Market (Series 9)
5026 W. Thomas Road, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 14
Liquor license violations: In October 2023, a fine of $1,500 was paid for failure to follow
the identification procedure prescribed by statutes and for selling, giving, or furnishing
an underage person with alcohol.

Los Vaqueros (Series 10)
6440 W. Van Buren St., Phoenix
Calls for police service: 1
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have been the owner/member of a Limited Liability Company that has held a Series
9 Liquor License for many years. I have operated a store at 5026 W Thomas Road. I
am building a new store at 5121 W Thomas Road and I am asking to move the current
store and liquor license to the new location.”



Page 45

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“I have been a member of the business communiity in Maryvale for many years. Other
than the liquor store, I own and operate a carniceria on the corner of 51st Avenue and
Thomas Road. I know the neighborhood and most of my customers.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment - Quick Corner Liquors - Data
Attachment - Quick Corner Liquors - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 46
Liquor License Data: QUICK CORNER LIQUORS
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 3 0

Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 0

Liquor Store 9 7 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 5 2

Restaurant 12 3 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 158.83 210.08

Violent Crimes 12.31 43.6 50.53

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 45 202

Total Violations 78 382




Page 47
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1099001 877 82 16 25

1099003 3146 54 16 33

1099004 697 77 17 19

1100011 1818 78 8 20

1100012 1781 69 8 14

1123012 2098 68 7 47

1123021 1045 48 24 28

1123022 1551 48 25 28

1123023 1472 59 12 59

1124011 1191 48 18 26

1124012 2494 70 5 36

1124013 1653 64 17 20

1124022 1531 76 21 27

Average 0 61 13 19




Page 48
Liquor License Map: QUICK CORNER LIQUORS
5121 W THOMAS RD




Ü
Date: 2/16/2024
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 49



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Knights of Columbus Cathedral Council 12708

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Richard Garrison

Location
6351 N. 27th Ave.
Council District: 5

Function
Dinner

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
May 24, 2024 - 6 p.m. to 10 p.m. / 300 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 50



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Cursillo Movement of Phoenix, Inc.

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Sophia Bejarano

Location
4633 N. 54th St.
Council District: 6

Function
Dinner

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
May 11, 2024 - 5 p.m. to 9 p.m. / 250 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 51



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Foothills Educational Foundation

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Randi Garcia

Location
4515 E. Muirwood Drive
Council District: 6

Function
Auction

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
April 20, 2024 - 5 p.m. to 10 p.m. / 200 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 52



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Camelback Flowershop

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 278104.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Keck, Agent

License Type
Series 10 and 10S - Beer and Wine Store with Sampling Privileges

Location
4214 E. Indian School Road, Ste. 103/105
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 6

This request is for a new liquor license for a beer and wine store with sampling
privileges. This location was not previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have
an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 15, 2024.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations on file with the AZ


Page 53

Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within the boundaries of
Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the last 12 months for
the address listed.

Camelback Flower Shop (Series 10)
4214 E. Indian School Road, Ste. 101, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 4
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am a certified liquor manager in the State of Arizona. I have a degree in Hotel,
Restaurant and Travel Administration from the University of Massachusetts. I have
managed in the restaurant industry for over 20 years in Arizona. I understand liquor
laws and will responsibly manage shop, including training my staff on responsible
alcohol sales behaviors.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We are an established, well respected business in the Arcadia area. We sell great
quality flowers and retail goods. We would like to offer high quality wines and beer to
sell to our patrons to go with the other products we sell. We believe the community
would be happy to have the ability to purchase flowers and wine or beer at the same
location. We have been selling with a Series 10 License in our shop that is 30 feet
away from this location and it has been well received.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment - Camelback Flowershop - Data
Attachment - Camelback Flowershop - Map

Responsible Department


Page 54

This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - HHATT

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 278911.

Summary

Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
1001 N. Central, Fl. 1
Zoning Classification: DTC - Downtown Gateway
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 7, 2024.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.


Page 59


Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards to maintain compliance
with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the techniques of legal and
responsible alcohol sales and service.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Hhatt is located on the first floor and the park-like outdoor space of the 9-story
building on the northeast corner of Roosevelt and North Central Avenue. The casual,
neighborhood restaurant will feature freshly-made gourmet appetizers, salads,
sandwiches and specialty pizzas. Applicant would like to offer alcoholic beverages to
guests 21 and over.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment - HHATT - Data
Attachment - HHATT - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Milk & Honey

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 271605.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent

License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store

Location
888 N. 1st Ave., Ste. 112
Zoning Classification: DTC-Downtown Gateway
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a liquor store. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 13, 2024.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations


Page 64

on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Milk & Honey (Series 9)
333 E. Roosevelt St., #114, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 49
Liquor license violations: None

Milk & Honey (Series 10)
115 W. 6th St., Tempe
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: In February 2018, a fine of $3,000 was paid for failure to
request an ID from an underage buyer and for selling, giving, or furnishing an
underage person with alcohol. In October 2019, a fine of $6,000 was paid for failure to
request an ID from an underage buyer and for selling, giving, or furnishing an
underage person with alcohol.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Currently own and operate other businesses in the Valley including businesses with
liquor licenses. We ensure all of our employees have attended Title 4 liquor law
training.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We would like to offer the downtown area a convenient place to shop for their
everyday needs.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.



Page 65

Attachments
Attachment - Milk & Honey - Data
Attachment - Milk & Honey - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 66
Liquor License Data: MILK & HONEY
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Producer 1 1 0

Microbrewery 3 5 3

Government 5 7 5

Bar 6 50 17

Beer and Wine Bar 7 17 8

Liquor Store 9 5 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 16 5

Hotel 11 8 2

Restaurant 12 124 55

Club 14 2 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 267.91 360.5

Violent Crimes 12.31 61.04 74.3
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 45 73

Total Violations 78 118




Page 67
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1129001 1670 70 4 19

1129002 815 37 22 24

1130001 1218 23 16 11

1130002 873 29 21 38

1131001 1015 7 8 28

1131002 1242 3 7 33

1141001 2299 16 37 44

Average 0 61 13 19




Page 68
Liquor License Map: MILK & HONEY
888 N 1ST AVE




Ü
Date: 2/13/2024
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 69



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Evan's Churchill Community Association

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Sean Johnson

Location
907 N. 5th St.
Council District: 8

Function
Block Party

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
April 19, 2024 - 4:20 p.m. - Midnight / 5,000 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 70



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Carolina's Mexican Food

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 279168.

Summary

Applicant
Juanita Esparza, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
1202 E. Mohave St.
Zoning Classification: C-2 AIOD
Council District: 8

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 9, 2024.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.


Page 71


Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“The owner's of Carolina's Mexican Food, Inc are committed to upholding high
standards for "It's Bus practices and employees. They have been trained in the
techniques of legal and responsibility and has taken Title IV Liquor training course as
well as all employees. As the owner's and operators of the restaurant they will oversee
all employees and will provide a safe experience all staff and patrons.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“The owner's of Carolina's Mexican Food, Inc wish to provide dining in a family
restaurant environment with the service of an alcoholic drink at the restaurant of any
patron over the age of 21 years. In addition the owners of Carolina's Mex Food, Inc will
assume responsibility and adhere to all State and Federal Tax laws and maintain a
strict adherenceto the security requirements of the City and State.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment - Carolina's Mexican Food - Data
Attachment - Carolina's Mexican Food - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 72
Liquor License Data: CAROLINA'S MEXICAN FOOD
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Wholesaler 4 2 0

Bar 6 1 1

Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 1

Liquor Store 9 2 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 5 1

Restaurant 12 2 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 58.7 41.71

Violent Crimes 12.31 9.87 8.7
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 45 78

Total Violations 78 149


Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1140002 78 77 0 32

1172001 823 25 17 70

1172002 851 25 28 20

Average 0 61 13 19




Page 73
Liquor License Map: CAROLINA'S MEXICAN FOOD
1202 E MOHAVE ST




Ü
Date: 2/22/2024
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 74



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Ezbachi

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 278719.

Summary

Applicant
Jaqueline Padilla, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
1713 S. Central Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-3
Council District: 8

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This location requires a
Use Permit to allow outdoor dining and outdoor alcohol consumption.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 15, 2024.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of


Page 75

Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have a manager certification for liquor. I have manage places of businesses that sold
liquor. I am aware of how to properly and safely work/sell liquor.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We want for the community to be able to sit down with family, friends, co-workers to
enjoy a great meal and a drink within their own community rather than going else
where. We hope to bring value to the community. We have the best interest of the
community and the growth.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment - Ezbachi - Data
Attachment - Ezbachi - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 76
Liquor License Data: EZBACHI
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Producer 1 1 0

Government 5 1 0

Bar 6 8 0

Liquor Store 9 2 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 9 4

Hotel 11 2 0

Restaurant 12 9 2

Club 14 2 0



Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 105.44 150.63

Violent Crimes 12.31 28.39 41.4

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 45 121

Total Violations 78 217




Page 77
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1142001 1321 36 22 50

1149001 798 28 13 57

1149002 1742 11 3 68

1172001 823 25 17 70

1172002 851 25 28 20

Average 0 61 13 19




Page 78
Liquor License Map: EZBACHI
1713 S CENTRAL AVE




Ü
Date: 2/20/2024
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 79



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - La Consentida Tacos and Sushi

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 270372.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
2647 W. Glendale Ave., Ste. 11-14
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 5

This request is for an acquisition of control of an existing liquor license for a restaurant.
This location is currently licensed for liquor sales.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 14, 2024.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Silverado Canta Bar (Series 6)
4809 N. 27th Ave., Phoenix
Calls for police service: 45


Page 80

Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We train all of our employees in responsible liquor service. We also conduct regular
audits to ensure they comply.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends disapproval of this application based on a Police Department
recommendation for disapproval. The Police Department disapproval is based on
concerns with the applicant's employment history and involvement with locations with
a history of liquor license violations. The applicant has not demonstrated the capability,
qualifications and reliability to hold and control a liquor license.

Attachments
Attachment - La Consentida Tacos and Sushi - Police Department Recommendation

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85



PAYMENT ORDINANCE (Ordinance S-50707) (Items 22-28)
Ordinance S-50707 is a request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse funds, up to amounts indicated below, for the purpose of
paying vendors, contractors, claimants and others, and providing
additional payment authority under certain existing city contracts. This
section also requests continuing payment authority, up to amounts
indicated below, for the following contracts, contract extensions and/or
bids awarded. As indicated below, some items below require payment
pursuant to Phoenix City Code Section 42-13.

22 Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power
District dba SRP
For $50,760 in payment authority to SRP for service and work needed to
add an electrical switch and transformer for new Fire Station 62, located at
9300 W Lower Buckeye Road, Phoenix, AZ 85053, for Fire Department
Project FD57100027-4.

23 AmeriNational Community Services LLC dba AmeriNat
For $200,000 in payment authority for a new contract, entered on or about
May 1, 2024, for a term of five years for loan services for the Housing
Department. The Housing Department is responsible for approximately
98 loans for affordable multifamily rentals, special needs housing, and
home ownership financial assistance programs, which are managed by a
financial institution. Services include but are not limited to collections,
account monitoring, cash-flow analysis, delinquency monitoring,
forbearance plans, online account services, loan subordination, and other
loan portfolio management services. These loans are generally financed
with federal funds. There is no impact to the General Fund.

24 NEVCO Sports, LLC
For $46,000 in payment authority for a one-time purchase to replace
seven LED scoreboards, including four at Desert West Sports Complex


Page 86

and three at Rose Mofford Sports Complex, for the Parks and Recreation
Department.

25 WMDTech, LLC
For $35,000 in payment authority for an Explosive Ordnance Disposal
training course for the Bomb Squad Unit of the Police Department. The
course is designed to provide bomb responders with knowledge and
decision-making skills when responding to a Special Event Response
(SER), and will cover instances when complete separation or isolation of a
package is not possible. The focus of the training will be on potential
threats during initial encounters, knowledge of the type of equipment
necessary to conduct a response, X-Ray techniques, as well as other
skills needed to respond to a SER, while ensuring the safety of the public
and bomb responders.

26 Settlement of Claim(s) Lopez v. City of Phoenix
To make payment of up to $36,000 in settlement of claim(s) in Lopez v.
Department pursuant to Phoenix City Code Chapter 42. This is a
settlement of a claim involving the Police Department that occurred on
May 17, 2022.

27 Settlement of Claim(s) Moreno v. City of Phoenix
To make payment of up to $50,000 in settlement of claim(s) in Moreno v.
Department pursuant to Phoenix City Code Chapter 42. This is a
settlement of a claim involving the Public Works Department that occurred
on March 9, 2022.

28 Settlement of Claim(s) Salazar v. City of Phoenix
To make payment of up to $650,000 in settlement of claim(s) in Salazar
v. City of Phoenix, CV2019-01188, 18-1059-001, GL, BI, for the Finance
Department pursuant to Phoenix City Code Chapter 42. This is a
settlement of a claim involving the Police Department that occurred on
March 5, 2019.




Page 87



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Proposed SWC 67th Ave and Broadway Road Right of Way De-Annexation
(Ordinance S-50749)

Request City Council authorization to de-annex and decrease the corporate limits of
the City of Phoenix, Maricopa County, State of Arizona, pursuant to the provisions of
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 9, Chapter 4, Article 7 (section 9-471.03), by de-
annexing a certain tract of land within the present corporate limits of the City of
Phoenix, contingent upon that same tract of land being received by Maricopa County
and declaring as County right-of-way, and the approval by the Maricopa County Board
of Supervisors.

Summary
Maricopa County Department of Transportation is requiring dedication of right-of-way
and roadway improvements for development along 67th Avenue. The City of Phoenix
Street Transportation Department has requested the City of Phoenix de-annex a
certain portion of right-of-way currently located within the limits of the City of Phoenix
in connection with the Maricopa County Department of Transportation's requirement.

Location
The proposed de-annexation area includes the southwest corner of 67th Avenue and
Broadway Road intersection right of way. (Attachment A) Additionally, all parts of the
intersection of 67th Avenue and Broadway Road are to be maintained by Maricopa
County Department of Transportation. The de-annexation area is approximately
0.1705 acres (0.0002 sq. mi.), decreasing the area of the City of Phoenix by
approximately 0.1705 acres.

Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 88
Attachment A


DE-ANNEXATION MAP

SOUTHWEST CORNER 67TH AVE • City of Phoenix
AND BROADWAY RD
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SECTION 25 T. 1 N., R. 1 E.,
G. & 5. R. B. & M.

AREA IN SQUARE MILES
ANNEXATION NUMBER: XXX 0.0002




NE COR,
SEC25
POB
W BROADWAY RD




-----••---•·.._________


N 44 °36'42" W29.85'
N 00 °05'13" E 10' CITY LIMIT LINE,
._______ ORD. S-39443
2012-1165282 MCR
N s9•1s•3r w 55'

!W
i�
• J:
'I I­
r--
! U)
! (/) Legend
I
� Area To Be De-Annexed

·-·· ..
1:-··-: Existing City Limits




Page 89
LEGAL DESCRIPTION DE-ANNEXATION AREA

THE AREA DESCRIBED IN CITY OF PHOENIX ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. S-39443 RECORDED
IN DOCUMENT NO. 2012-1165282 LOCATED WITHIN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION
25, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25, BEING MARKED BY A BRASS CAP
IN HAND HOLE, FROM WHICH POINT THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25,
BEING MARKED BY A BRASS CAP FLUSH, BEARS NORTH 89°18’37” WEST (BASIS OF BEARINGS), A
DISTANCE OF 2629.14 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 00°05’13” WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER AND
THE EAST LINE OF SAID ORDINANCE NO. S-39443, A DISTANCE OF 86.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°18’37” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 55.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST
55 FEET OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER;

THENCE NORTH 00°05’13” EAST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 44°36’42” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 29.85 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE
NORTH 55 FEET OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER;

THENCE NORTH 89°18’37” WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 24.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°05’13” EAST, A DISTANCE OF 55.00 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
NORTHEAST QUARTER, AND THE NORTH LINE OF SAID ORDINANCE NO. S-39443;

THENCE SOUTH 89°18’37” EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 7,425 SQ.FT. OR 0.1705 ACRES, MORE OR LESS




Page 90



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Part-Time Television Engineering Services - RFQU 19-070 - Amendment
(Ordinance S-50716)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendment to
Contract 150025 with Engineering and Recording dba EAR Professional Audio and
Video, to extend the contract term and add additional expenditures. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional
expenditures will not exceed $96,000.

Summary
This contract will provide the Communications Office with required part-time
engineering services, maintenance of all station engineering facilities, video production
software, software and equipment upgrades, live streaming, emergency equipment
failure and service support as needed, as well as equipment tech research, and
installation and operation of equipment and services.

The Communications Office operates PHXTV, a cable station available to inform the
public. The station broadcasts programming on-air and online which requires television
engineering services for the audio and video support provided for City Council,
Subcommittee and department meetings.

Contract Term
Upon approval the contract will be extended through May 15, 2025, with an option to
extend through May 15, 2026.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $96,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $324,000. Funds are available in the Communications Office's
budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Part-Time Television Engineering Services Contract 150025 (Ordinance S-45664)
on May 15, 2019.



Page 91

· Part-Time Television Engineering Services Contract 150025 (Ordinance S-47628)
on June 2, 2021.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Communications Office.




Page 92



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Citywide Marketing Services - CTR056866 State of Arizona Cooperative Contract
- Request for Award (Ordinance S-50711)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Riester Sonoran, LLC, to provide marketing services and materials on an as-needed
basis for Citywide departments. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed
$253,550.

Summary
This contract will provide a wide variety of marketing services and materials to support
operations Citywide. The range of products and services from this contract include
creative design, production media buying and placement, interactive marketing
services, public relations, and multicultural-focused marketing.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved determination memo based on the following reason: Special
Circumstances Alternative Competition. This State of Arizona Cooperative Agreement
offers the best cost and provides full services to the City. The contract was awarded
through a competitive process consistent with the City's procurement processes as set
forth in the Phoenix City Code Chapter 43, and best aligns with the City's terms,
conditions and needs.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about April 1, 2024, and expire on the expiration date of
the Master Agreement, Sept. 30, 2026, with no options to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $253,550 for the aggregate term.

Funding is available in Citywide department budgets.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.


Page 93



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Real Time Captioning and Sign Language Interpretation Services Contract -
RFQu-24-0086 - Request for Award (Ordinance S-50721)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to establish a qualified vendor
list and enter into contracts with Access Professional Interpreting, Inc.; Arizona
Interpreting Service, Inc.; Horn Interpreting Services, Inc., dba Arizona Freelance
Interpreting Services; Karla M. Martin; Lango SW, LLC; Language Line Services, Inc.;
and Translation & Interpretation Network, LLC, to provide real time captioning and sign
language interpretation services for Citywide departments. Further request to authorize
the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the
contracts will not exceed $728,000.

Summary
These contracts will provide real time captioning and sign language interpretation
services for Citywide departments. Real time captioning and sign language
interpretation services are utilized by various departments for effective communication
with employees and customers who have disabilities so that the community may
participate in City business and/or employment. These types of services ensure
inclusivity under the City's Equal Opportunity Plan and is required under Title II and III
of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The contracts will be available to all City
departments, with primary usage from Communications, Parks and Recreation,
Human Services, and the Aviation departments.

Procurement Information
A Request for Qualifications procurement was processed in accordance with
Administrative Regulation 3.10 to establish a Qualified Vendor List (QVL).

There were eight offers submitted and seven were deemed to be responsive and
responsible. The procurement officer evaluated those offers as a pass or fail based on
the following minimum qualifications:
· Experience
· Capacity
· Qualifications




Page 94

The procurement officer recommends award to the following Offerors:
· Access Professional Interpreting, Inc.
· Arizona Interpreting Service, Inc.
· Horn Interpreting Services, Inc. dba Arizona Freelance Interpreting Services
· Karla M. Martin
· Lango SW, LLC
· Language Line Services, Inc.
· Translation & Interpretation Network, LLC

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about April 15, 2024, for a five-year term with no options
to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $728,000.

Funding is available in various department budgets.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.




Page 95



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acceptance of a Temporary Construction Easement for a High Intensity
Activated Crosswalk at Osborn Road, West of 5th Avenue (Ordinance S-50725)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to accept a temporary
construction easement (TCE) from WFC North Park, LLC, for a High Intensity
Activated Crosswalk (HAWK) at Osborn Road, west of 5th Avenue.

Summary
The TCE is for installation of a HAWK to provide pedestrians and bicyclists a secure
passage for crossing the street, while enhancing safety and minimizing traffic
impediment. Project improvements for the HAWK include striping, signals, lighting,
curbs, gutters, and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant sidewalks and
ramps.

WFC North Park, LLC, donated a TCE within Maricopa County Assessor's parcel
number 118-29-001G, Maricopa County Recording number 2024-0078490, recorded
on Feb. 15, 2024. The TCE will commence upon 10-day advance written notification of
the start of project construction and will terminate upon completion of project
construction or within one year after commencement, whichever occurs first.

Financial Impact
The temporary construction easement was donated to the City at no cost.

Location
Osborn Road, west of 5th Avenue
Council District: 4

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Street
Transportation and Finance departments.




Page 96



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Cabling Communication Systems - State of Arizona Cooperative Contract -
COOP 24-0211 Request for Award (Ordinance S-50747)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contracts with
Anixter, Inc.; BPG Technologies, LLC; Cable Solutions, LLC; Corporate Technology
Solutions, LLC; Fishel Company; Graybar Electric Company, Inc.; IES Commercial,
Inc.; Kearney Electric, Inc.; and Tel Tech Networks, Inc.; for equipment, installation,
testing, and warranty of cabling communications systems for the Information
Technology Services Department for Citywide use. Further request an exception to the
indemnity and assumption of liability provisions of Phoenix City Code section 42-18.
Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The total value of the contracts will not exceed $17,500,000.

Summary
Cabling communication systems are used Citywide to connect City facilities to the data
network and phone system through Internet access, phone lines, and data circuits,
allowing City facilities to connect to email, instant messaging, and access to critical
applications such as the City's financial accounting and reporting system and the
human resources system. The City's cabling communication systems are critical to
operations of City departments. Cabling communications systems enable access to
emergency services provided by the Police and Fire departments, provide internet
access in public libraries, allow the Parks and Recreation Department to manage
sprinkler systems in City parks, allow the Street Transportation Department to manage
traffic signals and lights throughout the City, and facilitate several other important City
services. Without the cabling communication systems, users and devices will not be
able to connect to their network and/or back-end systems for operations.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo based upon the following reason:
Special Circumstances Alternative Competition. The State of Arizona Communications
Cabling Systems contracts were awarded using a competitive process consistent with
the City's procurement processes set forth in the Phoenix City Code, Chapter 43. The
State of Arizona contracts cover various cabling communication systems and services
required by the City. Utilization of the State cooperative allows the City to benefit from


Page 97

statewide, government quantity pricing.

Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about April 15, 2024, through Oct. 1, 2027, with a one-
year option to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $17,500,000 for the aggregate term.
Funding is available in the Information Technology Services Department's budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department .




Page 98



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Glass Repair and Replacement Contract - IFB-24-0084 Request for Award
(Ordinance S-50734)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Arizona Glass and Door, LLC, to provide glass repair and replacement services for
Citywide departments. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $3,161,500.

Summary
This contract will provide glass products, repair, removal, and replacement services to
Citywide departments. City departments require various glass windows, mirrors, and
glass doors for commercial and residential buildings throughout the City. Additionally,
this contract will provide window tinting products such as blackout film, frost film, and
anti-graffiti film for existing windows and emergency board-up services for public
safety.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid procurement was processed in accordance with Administrative
Regulation 3.10.

One vendor submitted a bid deemed responsive to posted specifications and
responsible to provide the required goods and services. Following an evaluation based
on price, the procurement officer recommends award to the following vendor(s):

Selected Bidder
· Arizona Glass and Door LLC

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about April 1, 2024, for a five-year term with no options to
extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $3,161,500.

Funding is available in the various department operating budgets.


Page 99


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.




Page 100



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Grant of Easement to Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless, LLC, for the
Talking Stick Resort Amphitheatre at 2121 N. 83rd Ave. (Ordinance S-50750)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to grant an underground utility
easement to Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless, LLC within City-owned property
located at 2121 N. 83rd Ave., for consideration in the amount of the appraised value
and other consideration. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept all
funds related to this item.

Summary
The Parks and Recreation Department owns Talking Stick Resort Amphitheatre,
operated by Live Nation as an outdoor concert venue. Live Nation, on behalf of
Verizon, requested an easement for the installation of fiber circuit at the venue for
Verizon's 5G deployment to enhance communication for wireless technology. The six-
foot wide easement for underground utilities is approximately 4,076 square feet and
will be conveyed to Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless, LLC.

Financial Impact
Revenue will be reflective of the market value of the easement.

Location
2121 N. 83rd Ave., identified by Maricopa County Assessor parcel number 102-37-009.
Council District: 5

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Parks and
Recreation and Finance departments.




Page 101



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acceptance of an Easement for Water and Sewer Purposes (Ordinance S-50741)

Request for the City Council to accept an easement for water and sewer purposes;
further ordering the ordinance recorded.

Summary
Accepting the property interests below meets the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.

Easement (a)
Applicant: PV Retail II SPE, LLC; its successor and/or assigns
Purpose: Water and Sewer
Location: 12770 N. Tatum Blvd.
File: 230100
Council District: 3

Easement (b)
Applicant: PV Land SPE, LLC; its successor and/or assigns
Purpose: Water and Sewer
Location: 12750 N. Tatum Blvd.
File: 230100
Council District: 3

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development and Finance departments.




Page 102



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amendments to Pay Ordinance [S-49802] in Accordance with Human Resources
Committee 624 Recommendations (Ordinance S-50742)

The following amendments to the Pay Ordinance (Ordinance S-49802) are proposed
in accordance with the recommendation of Human Resources Committee 624, to be
effective on April 29, 2024. The proposal will also require modifications to the City’s
Classification Plan (Ordinance S-5815), which will be processed under a separate
ordinance.

Regrade the classification of Sales Supervisor, Job Code: 27150, Salary Plan: 001,
Grade/Range: 057 ($47,029 - $102,669/annual), Labor Unit Code: 007, Benefit
Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professional, FLSA Status: Exempt to Grade/Range:
059 ($49,379 - $107,806/annual).

Regrade the classification of Sales Manager, Job Code: 27120, Salary Plan: 001,
Grade/Range: 051 ($40,643 - $88,691/annual), Labor Unit Code: 007, Benefit
Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professional, FLSA Status: Exempt to Grade/Range:
053 ($42,661- $93,122/annual).

Regrade the classification of Events Coordinator, Job Code: 27460, Salary Plan: 001,
Grade/Range: 045 ($35,110 - $76,627/annual), Labor Unit Code: 007, Benefit
Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professional, FLSA Status: Nonexempt to
Grade/Range: 051 ($40,643 - $88,691/annual).

Regrade the classification of Asst Event Services Manager, Job Code: 80200, Salary
Plan: 001, Grade/Range: 049 ($38,688 - $84,469/annual), Labor Unit Code: 007,
Benefit Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professional, FLSA Status: Exempt to
Grade/Range: 053 ($42,661 - $93,122/annual).

Regrade the classification of Neighborhood Maintenance Tech I, Job Code: 60630,
Salary Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 331 ($31,845 - $54,454/annual), Labor Unit Code:
003, Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Administrative Support, FLSA Status:
Nonexempt to Grade/Range: 337 ($31,845 - $63,045/annual).

Regrade the classification of Building Code Examiner, Job Code: 60200, Salary Plan:


Page 103

006, Grade/Range: 357 ($47,029 - $102,669/annual), Labor Unit Code: 003, Benefit
Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Nonexempt to
Grade/Range: 359 ($49,379 - $107,806/annual).

Regrade the classification of Electrical Plans Examiner I, Job Code: 60100, Salary
Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 351 ($40,643 - $88,691/annual), Labor Unit Code: 003,
Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Nonexempt to
Grade/Range: 355 ($44,803 - $97,781/annual).

Regrade the classification of Electrical Plans Examiner II, Job Code: 60110, Salary
Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 357 ($47,029 - $102,669/annual), Labor Unit Code: 003,
Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Nonexempt to
Grade/Range: 359 ($49,379 - $107,806/annual).

Regrade the classification of Mechanical Plans Examiner I, Job Code: 60080, Salary
Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 351 ($40,643 - $88,691/annual), Labor Unit Code: 003,
Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Nonexempt to
Grade/Range: 355 ($44,803 - $97,781/annual).

Regrade the classification of Mechanical Plans Examiner II, Job Code: 60090, Salary
Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 357 ($47,029 - $102,669/annual), Labor Unit Code: 003,
Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Nonexempt to
Grade/Range: 359 ($49,379 - $107,806/annual).

Regrade the classification of Structural Plans Examiner I, Job Code: 60140, Salary
Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 351 ($40,643 - $88,691/annual), Labor Unit Code: 003,
Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Nonexempt to
Grade/Range: 355 ($44,803 - $97,781/annual).

Regrade the classification of Structural Plans Examiner II, Job Code: 60150, Salary
Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 357 ($47,029 - $102,669/annual), Labor Unit Code: 003,
Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Nonexempt to
Grade/Range: 359 ($49,379 - $107,806/annual).

Regrade the classification of Construction Permit Spec I, Job Code: 60070, Salary
Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 351 ($40,643 - $88,691/annual), Labor Unit Code: 003,
Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Nonexempt to
Grade/Range: 355 ($44,803 - $97,781/annual).

Regrade the classification of Elevator Insp Field Supv, Job Code: 60340, Salary Plan:
001, Grade/Range: 059 ($49,379 - $107,806/annual), Labor Unit Code: 007, Benefit


Page 104

Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professional, FLSA Status: Exempt to Grade/Range:
063 ($54,454 - $118,872/annual).

Regrade the classification of General Insp Field Supv, Job Code: 60040, Salary Plan:
001, Grade/Range: 057 ($47,029 - $102,669/annual), Labor Unit Code: 007, Benefit
Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professional, FLSA Status: Exempt to Grade/Range:
063 ($54,454 - $118,872/annual).

Retitle and regrade the classification of Asst Real Estate Admin, Job Code: 12190,
Salary Plan: 001, Grade/Range: 067 ($60,029 - $131,040/annual), Labor Unit Code:
007, Benefit Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professional, FLSA Status: Exempt to
Job Title: Real Estate Prog Manager, Grade/Range: 069 ($63,045 - $137,592/annual).

Retitle and regrade the classification of Asst Risk Management Admin, Job Code:
12360, Salary Plan: 001, Grade/Range: 067 ($60,029 - $131,040/annual), Labor Unit
Code: 007, Benefit Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professional, FLSA Status:
Exempt to Job Title: Risk Management Prog Manager, Grade/Range: 069 ($63,045 -
$137,592/annual).

Reclassify the filled position of Project Manager, Position #: 00018116, Job Code:
08640, Salary Plan: 001, Grade/Range: 067 ($60,029 - $131,040/annual), Labor Unit
Code: 007, Benefit Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professional, FLSA Status:
Exempt to Job Title: Administrative Assistant III, Job Code: 06050, Salary Plan: 001,
Grade/Range: 061 ($51,854 - $113,194/annual), Labor Unit Code: 007, Benefit
Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professional, FLSA Status: Exempt.

Abolish the classification of Neighborhood Maintenance Tech III, Job Code: 60650,
Salary Plan: 001, Grade/Range: 048 ($37,773 - $82,451/annual), Labor Unit Code:
007, Benefit Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Nonexempt.

Abolish the classification of Property Records Specialist, Job Code: 12080, Salary
Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 347 ($36,858 - $80,454/annual), Labor Unit Code: 003,
Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Nonexempt.

Abolish the classification of Property Records Supervisor Job Code: 12040, Salary
Plan: 001, Grade/Range: 061 ($51,854 - $113,194/annual), Labor Unit Code: 007,
Benefit Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professional, FLSA Status: Exempt.

Summary
The Classification and Compensation study was implemented rapidly to address a
systemic staffing and labor market crisis throughout the City. Adjustments to grade and


Page 105

salary ranges are necessary as the City adapts to the new pay structures that took
effect on Aug. 7, 2023. These recommendations balance internal alignment with
external market focus. As a result of the changes made during the Classification and
Compensation study, staff requests that the adjustments listed above be approved.

Financial Impact
The estimated cost for this action for the first year is $7,614.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
On March 12, 2024, Human Resources Committee 624 reviewed and recommended
these modifications for approval effective on April 29, 2024.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Human Resources
Department.




Page 106



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amendments to Classification Plan (Ordinance S-5815) in Accordance with
Human Resources Committee 624 Recommendations (Ordinance S-50743)

The following amendments to the Classification Plan (Ordinance S-5815) are proposed
in accordance with the recommendation of Human Resources Committee 624, to be
effective on April 29, 2024. The proposal will also require modifications to the City’s
Pay Ordinance (S-49802), which will be processed under a separate ordinance.

Regrade the classification of Sales Supervisor, Job Code: 27150, Salary Plan: 001,
Grade/Range: 057 ($47,029 - $102,669/annual), Labor Unit Code: 007, Benefit
Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professional, FLSA Status: Exempt to Grade/Range:
059 ($49,379 - $107,806/annual).

Regrade the classification of Sales Manager, Job Code: 27120, Salary Plan: 001,
Grade/Range: 051 ($40,643 - $88,691/annual), Labor Unit Code: 007, Benefit
Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professional, FLSA Status: Exempt to Grade/Range:
053 ($42,661- $93,122/annual).

Regrade the classification of Events Coordinator, Job Code: 27460, Salary Plan: 001,
Grade/Range: 045 ($35,110 - $76,627/annual), Labor Unit Code: 007, Benefit
Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professional, FLSA Status: Nonexempt to
Grade/Range: 051 ($40,643 - $88,691/annual).

Regrade the classification of Asst Event Services Manager, Job Code: 80200, Salary
Plan: 001, Grade/Range: 049 ($38,688 - $84,469/annual), Labor Unit Code: 007,
Benefit Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professional, FLSA Status: Exempt to
Grade/Range: 053 ($42,661 - $93,122/annual).

Regrade the classification of Neighborhood Maintenance Tech I, Job Code: 60630,
Salary Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 331 ($31,845 - $54,454/annual), Labor Unit Code:
003, Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Administrative Support, FLSA Status:
Nonexempt to Grade/Range: 337 ($31,845 - $63,045/annual).

Regrade the classification of Building Code Examiner, Job Code: 60200, Salary Plan:
006, Grade/Range: 357 ($47,029 - $102,669/annual), Labor Unit Code: 003, Benefit


Page 107

Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Nonexempt to
Grade/Range: 359 ($49,379 - $107,806/annual).

Regrade the classification of Electrical Plans Examiner I, Job Code: 60100, Salary
Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 351 ($40,643 - $88,691/annual), Labor Unit Code: 003,
Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Nonexempt to
Grade/Range: 355 ($44,803 - $97,781/annual).

Regrade the classification of Electrical Plans Examiner II, Job Code: 60110, Salary
Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 357 ($47,029 - $102,669/annual), Labor Unit Code: 003,
Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Nonexempt to
Grade/Range: 359 ($49,379 - $107,806/annual).

Regrade the classification of Mechanical Plans Examiner I, Job Code: 60080, Salary
Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 351 ($40,643 - $88,691/annual), Labor Unit Code: 003,
Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Nonexempt to
Grade/Range: 355 ($44,803 - $97,781/annual).

Regrade the classification of Mechanical Plans Examiner II, Job Code: 60090, Salary
Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 357 ($47,029 - $102,669/annual), Labor Unit Code: 003,
Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Nonexempt to
Grade/Range: 359 ($49,379 - $107,806/annual).

Regrade the classification of Structural Plans Examiner I, Job Code: 60140, Salary
Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 351 ($40,643 - $88,691/annual), Labor Unit Code: 003,
Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Nonexempt to
Grade/Range: 355 ($44,803 - $97,781/annual).

Regrade the classification of Structural Plans Examiner II, Job Code: 60150, Salary
Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 357 ($47,029 - $102,669/annual), Labor Unit Code: 003,
Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Nonexempt to
Grade/Range: 359 ($49,379 - $107,806/annual).

Regrade the classification of Construction Permit Spec I, Job Code: 60070, Salary
Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 351 ($40,643 - $88,691/annual), Labor Unit Code: 003,
Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Nonexempt to
Grade/Range: 355 ($44,803 - $97,781/annual).

Regrade the classification of Elevator Insp Field Supv, Job Code: 60340, Salary Plan:
001, Grade/Range: 059 ($49,379 - $107,806/annual), Labor Unit Code: 007, Benefit
Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professional, FLSA Status: Exempt to Grade/Range:


Page 108

063 ($54,454 - $118,872/annual).

Regrade the classification of General Insp Field Supv, Job Code: 60040, Salary Plan:
001, Grade/Range: 057 ($47,029 - $102,669/annual), Labor Unit Code: 007, Benefit
Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professional, FLSA Status: Exempt to Grade/Range:
063 ($54,454 - $118,872/annual).

Retitle and regrade the classification of Asst Real Estate Admin, Job Code: 12190,
Salary Plan: 001, Grade/Range: 067 ($60,029 - $131,040/annual), Labor Unit Code:
007, Benefit Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professional, FLSA Status: Exempt to
Job Title: Real Estate Prog Manager, Grade/Range: 069 ($63,045 - $137,592/annual).

Retitle and regrade the classification of Asst Risk Management Admin, Job Code:
12360, Salary Plan: 001, Grade/Range: 067 ($60,029 - $131,040/annual), Labor Unit
Code: 007, Benefit Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professional, FLSA Status:
Exempt to Job Title: Risk Management Prog Manager, Grade/Range: 069 ($63,045 -
$137,592/annual).

Reclassify the filled position of Project Manager, Position #: 00018116, Job Code:
08640, Salary Plan: 001, Grade/Range: 067 ($60,029 - $131,040/annual), Labor Unit
Code: 007, Benefit Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professional, FLSA Status:
Exempt to Job Title: Administrative Assistant III, Job Code: 06050, Salary Plan: 001,
Grade/Range: 061 ($51,854 - $113,194/annual), Labor Unit Code: 007, Benefit
Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professional, FLSA Status: Exempt.

Abolish the classification of Neighborhood Maintenance Tech III, Job Code: 60650,
Salary Plan: 001, Grade/Range: 048 ($37,773 - $82,451/annual), Labor Unit Code:
007, Benefit Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Nonexempt.

Abolish the classification of Property Records Specialist, Job Code: 12080, Salary
Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 347 ($36,858 - $80,454/annual), Labor Unit Code: 003,
Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Nonexempt.

Abolish the classification of Property Records Supervisor Job Code: 12040, Salary
Plan: 001, Grade/Range: 061 ($51,854 - $113,194/annual), Labor Unit Code: 007,
Benefit Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professional, FLSA Status: Exempt.

Summary
The Classification and Compensation study was implemented rapidly to address a
systemic staffing and labor market crisis throughout the City. Adjustments to grade and
salary ranges are necessary as the City adapts to the new pay structures that took


Page 109

effect on Aug. 7, 2023. These recommendations balance internal alignment with
external market focus. As a result of the changes made during the Classification and
Compensation study, staff requests that the adjustments listed above be approved.

Financial Impact
The estimated cost for this action for the first year is $7,614.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
On March 12, 2024, Human Resources Committee 624 reviewed and recommended
these modifications for approval effective on April 29, 2024.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Human Resources
Department.




Page 110



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Legal Document Retrieval Services - Legal Document Retrieval Services
Agreement for Litigation and Claims with DocuTraK, LLC (Ordinance S-50735)

Request to authorize the City Attorney, through the City Manager or his designee, to
enter into an agreement with DocuTrak, LLC (DocuTraK), to provide legal document
retrieval services, such as medical bills and other records related to litigation or notice
of claims for the Law Department. The aggregate amount will not exceed $225,000 for
a five year agreement. Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse
all funds related to this item.

Summary
The purpose of this agreement is for document retrieval related to litigation or notice of
claims to pull all relevant documents such as medical, hospital, billing, payroll,
personnel, insurance claims, Medicare, the United States Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA), Social Security, police departments, fire departments, the Occupational
Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), employment and educational records.
Those records are provided to the Law Department as related to cases in litigation, or
where the City has received a notice of claim, to assist in evaluation of the case and
for discovery purposes.

Procurement Information
Legal services are exempt from the Procurement Code. Nevertheless, the Law
Department sought quotes from multiple vendors. DocuTraK was the only responsive
offeror and was selected. Moreover, in accordance with Administrative Regulation
3.10, standard competition was waived as a result of an approved determination
memo where there was insufficient time for competition as a result of only one
responsive offer being received and the critical need for these contracted services to
be in place for the Law Department.

Contract Term
The term of the Legal Services Agreement will begin on or about March 20, 2024, for
five years.

Financial Impact
Funds are not anticipated to exceed $225,000 for the five-year term.


Page 111


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Law Department.




Page 112



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Restate and Amend Lease Agreement 35179 with Friendly
House at 723 S. 1st. Ave. (Ordinance S-50708)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to restate and amend Lease
Agreement 35179 with Friendly House to extend the term for 40 years, allow for tenant
improvements and co-location of partner nonprofits, and to provide an option to
purchase. Further request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept all funds
related to this item.

Summary
The City acquired and leased land to Friendly House (Tenant) through a development
agreement to construct, operate, and maintain the Youth and Americanization Center
at 723 S. 1st Ave. The ground lease, effective June 21, 1984, for approximately 18,170
square feet of land provided for a 40-year term, expires June 20, 2024.

The term will be extended 40 years (Extended Term) to allow for continued operations
by Friendly House. The lease will be amended to allow for tenant improvements, with
written approval from the City to support modern programs and community needs, at
Tenant's sole expense. With the goal of better serving the community, Tenant will be
allowed to co-locate partner nonprofits who share the same mission and similarly
contribute to the community. The amendment will include an option to purchase the
property at the beginning of the fifth and 10th anniversary of the Extended Term,
subject to applicable Community Development Block Grant requirements. The
purchase price, exclusive of tenant improvements, will be based on the then-appraised
value, as procured, reviewed, and approved by the Finance Department's Real Estate
Division,

Rent will be $135,000, plus applicable taxes, for the first five years of the Extended
Term. Rent will be abated for the first year, then adjusted to $33,750 per year, plus
applicable taxes, each year thereafter. Beginning year five, rent will be adjusted every
five years to the then-market rent throughout the Extended Term. Rent is within the
range of market rents as determined by the Finance Department's Real Estate
Division. Tenant may receive a rent credit equal to an amount not to exceed the annual
rent for non-monetary contributions and services provided to the community, to be
quantified in terms of dollars.


Page 113


Contract Term
The Extended Term is 40 years from June 21, 2024, through June 20, 2064.

Financial Impact
Contract rent during the first five years of the lease is $135,000, plus applicable taxes,
which may be offset by non-monetary contributions and services, to be quantified in
terms of dollars.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Lease Agreement 35179 (Ordinance S-14965) was adopted on June 6, 1984.

Location
723 S. 1st Ave.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Human Services
and Finance departments.




Page 114



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Phoenix Union High School District Agreement (Ordinance S-50739)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Phoenix Union High School District No. 210 for the Aquatics All City Staff Meeting
and future meetings. Further request to authorize and grant an exception pursuant to
Phoenix City Code 42-18 authorizing indemnification or assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise would be prohibited for the agreement.

Summary
The City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation Department (Parks) Aquatics program holds
an annual All City Staff Meeting totaling approximately 600 part-time employees. Parks
does not have a facility with the capacity to hold such a large meeting for that many
people. Central High School in the Phoenix Union High School District has the means
to accommodate the large group. Central High School is offering a low rate to rent the
facility which includes free parking for attendees. However, in order to utilize the
facility, Parks is required to enter into a Facility Use Agreement that contains
indemnification and assumption language of liability provisions that otherwise would be
prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This authorization requests authority to allow
for mutual indemnification to enter into agreements with Phoenix Union High School
District for the Aquatics All City Staff Meeting and future meetings, if needed for large
events.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City.

Location
4525 N. Central Ave.
Council District: 4

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Parks and
Recreation Department.




Page 115



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Resolution to Amend the Downtown Enhanced Municipal Services District
Boundaries to Add Additional Parcels (Resolution 22188)

Request to adopt a resolution amending the Downtown Enhanced Municipal Services
District (Downtown EMSD) boundary to add additional parcels. Further request the
resolution exempt Phoenix Union High School District No. 210 of Maricopa County
from the Downtown EMSD assessment. There is no financial impact as a result of this
action.

Summary
The City Council authorized formation of the Downtown EMSD in 1990 to provide
enhanced municipal services, above and beyond the level of services provided in the
remainder of the City. The Downtown EMSD is currently generally bound by Fillmore
Street, 7th Street, 3rd Avenue, and the railroad tracks south of Jackson Street. The
Fillmore Street boundary currently bisects the Phoenix Bioscience Core (PBC) campus
and effectively excludes the northern half of the PBC from the Downtown EMSD. In an
effort to maintain cohesiveness for the PBC, the stakeholders in the northern half of
the PBC have requested to join the Downtown EMSD. The property being added to the
Downtown EMSD is owned or leased by the City of Phoenix, Arizona State University
(ASU), University of Arizona (UA), or Phoenix Union High School District and is
generally bound by 4th Street, 7th Street, Fillmore Street, and Garfield Street. Existing
developments within the expanded area include the Dignity Health Cancer Institute,
850 PBC and the Bioscience High School (Attachment A). No privately owned
properties are included in this Downtown EMSD expansion request.

In addition, Arizona Revised Statues 48-575 allows any government owned property
owner to be exempt from assessment through a resolution passed by City Council
upon finding the property owner is not benefited by being part of the Downtown EMSD.
Due to the limited funding the Phoenix Union High School District has available and
the limited benefit the school would receive, the school district will be exempt from
assessment.

The costs for the Downtown EMSD's services are paid through assessments on
property owners within the boundaries of the district. The expansion of the Downtown
EMSD boundary does not have any financial impact on the stakeholders in 2024. The


Page 116

Department utilizing the Genomic Facilities and Operations Fund to pay for
maintenance of the vacant land. Future financial impacts will be presented to City
Council for consideration in late 2024 for the 2025 EMSD budget year. Estimated 2025
financial impacts are:
· City of Phoenix - $52,000
· ASU - $76,000
· UA - $56,000

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact as a result of this action.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The item was recommended for approval by the Economic Development and Housing
Subcommittee at the March 20, 2024 meeting by a vote of 3-0.

Public Outreach
Staff presented to the following organizations:
· Bioscience High School - Jan. 10, 2024
· Phoenix Bioscience Core Stakeholder meeting - Jan. 12, 2024
· Downtown Voices Coalition - Jan. 13, 2024
· Central City Village Planning Committee - Feb. 12, 2024
· Evans Churchill Neighborhood Association - Feb. 14, 2024

Location
The Downtown EMSD is currently generally bounded by Fillmore Street, 7th Street,
3rd Avenue and the railroad tracks south of Jackson Street. The expansion area is
generally bounded by Fillmore Street, 7th Street, 4th Street and Garfield Street. The
expansion area includes the following parcel numbers:
· 111-46-153
· 111-46-156
· 111-44-145
· 111-44-146A
· 111-44-146B
· 111-44-147
· 111-44-143
· 111-46-081A
· 111-44-104


Page 117

· 111-44-105
· 111-44-106
· 111-44-107
· 111-44-108

Council Districts: 7 & 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers John Chan and Alan Stephenson, and
the Community and Economic Development and Street Transportation departments.




Page 118
$77$&+0(17$

Garfield Street
DOWNTOWN PHOENIX ENHANCED
MUNICIPAL SERVICES DISTRICT T 792

T
4th Street
2024 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
T
LEGEND & SCALE


SUBMITTED _________________________________ ___________
1 ASSESSMENT #
McKinley Street
SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS DATE
STREETSCAPE 799 800



T
APPROVED AT THE MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE
798 801
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
T
CITY OF PHOENIX THIS _________ DAY OF ________________, 2023
797 802
789 790


O
_____________________________
796 803




7th Street
MAYOR
0 125 250 375 500 795 804
ATTEST ________________________
CITY CLERK Feet
794 805
FILED THIS ________ DAY OF _________________, 2023
1 INCH = 125 FEET
_______________________________
Pierce Street
SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS 788
This drawing was created for reference and


T
planning purposes only and not for construction.

T
Parcel data from County Assessor as of 4/6/2023.
Assessment data updated as of 9/19/2023. 786

Fillmore Street
U
V
32-49 65


T
89 93
66 82 90

T
1 50 67 91 94A




T
51 68 100

T
52 69 92 104
53 70 111
54 72
Taylor Street


1st Street
U
V U
V

Central Avenue
7 29
55 73


T


T T T T
761 61 74 83 86
9 101




2nd Avenue 2nd Street 5th Street
60 762 110 769




3rd Avenue 1st Avenue 3rd Street
10 58




7th Street
59 71

T
25 57


T
12 105

T T
24 56
13 62 71A 763
84 102 109
14 22
Polk Street
VU T


U V


T

U
V U
V

T T
16 20 27 28 113
63 79


T

U
V T
80 99 107
103 106
17 81

Van Buren Street Van Buren Street
T 115
U
VUV T
T

T T
119 321
118 323 - 362 363
T
366 367
U
V
120-
320 322
Monroe Street Monroe Street

T
372 477
373 483 484 485 486

T
370 479 478


T
475A 491

T
374 375 - 489
368 490




T
488 487
369 475 481




2nd Street
Adams Street
T 509 510
498 500 - 507 513 512


T 497

T T 495
T
508 T 511 514-




Washington Street Washington Street


T T
5th Street
523 524 771 - 777 765-768 95-98
778-785

T 538 T
Jefferson Street

T T 528 529 543 544 545 546 547




7th Street
542 542A
548 549 550 Jefferson Street
759 Madison Street
T 551

T
556 557 558 561 562




T




T

T
554 555




Central Avenue
559 560 568 553



4th Street
569 570 571 572




3rd Avenue
Jackson Street


1st Avenue 1st Street 2nd Street 3rd Street
T T
2nd Ave
583 584
583 589

T
573 574 575 576 577 578 579 581
582 760 588 590 591-
580 758




Page 119
DOWNTOWN PHOENIX ENHANCED
MUNICIPAL SERVICES DISTRICT
2024 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM DETAIL
LotSizein CountyParcel BuildingSizein LotSizein CountyParcel BuildingSizein LotSizein BuildingSizein LotSizein BuildingSizein
ID# Owner ID# Owner ID# Owner CountyParcel# ID# Owner CountyParcel#
SquareFeet # SquareFeet SquareFeet # SquareFeet SquareFeet SquareFeet SquareFeet SquareFeet

1 FILLMOREAPARTMENTSOWNERLLC 97,222 111Ͳ42Ͳ139 292,582 202 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ459 1,126 405 KINDELAARONLAWRENCE 837 112Ͳ21Ͳ313 837 605 REDAJASON 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ065 1,076
2 ParcelNoLongerExistsͲMergedintoID1 203 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ460 1,394 406 SWINDLETIMOTHYD/KERRYK 837 112Ͳ21Ͳ314 837 606 ERBJAYPARRY 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ066 1,170
3 ParcelNoLongerExistsͲMergedintoID1 204 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ461 1,394 407 THORPEDAVIDH 858 112Ͳ21Ͳ315 858 607 TROYANEKDAVIDC/TINAM 1,042 112Ͳ42Ͳ067 985
4 ParcelNoLongerExistsͲMergedintoID1 205 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ462 1,126 408 STEVETOEDTEMEIER 751 112Ͳ21Ͳ316 751 608 JOELGREENBERGIRA5005 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ068 1,426
5 ParcelNoLongerExistsͲMergedintoID1 206 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ463 962 409 KULAKSUSANK 710 112Ͳ21Ͳ317 710 609 COOPERDAVID/ELIZABETH 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ069 900
6 ParcelNoLongerExistsͲMergedintoID1 207 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,310 112Ͳ21Ͳ464 1,310 410 AFRICAEDWINSIII 1,254 112Ͳ21Ͳ318 1,200 610 BRANNONCRAIGS/CHRISTINAM 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ070 1,020
7 JOHNEGARRETSONLIVINGTRUST/GARRETSONJOHNE 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ026 ParkingLot 208 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,159 112Ͳ21Ͳ465 1,159 411 COXRICHARD 755 112Ͳ21Ͳ319 755 611 MILLERKENNETHP 1,030 112Ͳ42Ͳ071 996
8 JOHNEGARRETSONLIVINGTRUST/GARRETSONJOHNE 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ024 ParkingLot 209 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,323 112Ͳ21Ͳ466 1,323 412 STEERTHEODORE 1,268 112Ͳ21Ͳ320 1,174 612 ESCHJON/KATHLEEN 1,558 112Ͳ42Ͳ072 1,463
9 333N.3RDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ022 ParkingLot 210 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ467 993 413 RUBINBRETT 1,148 112Ͳ21Ͳ321 1,098 613 REIFURTHLAWRENCE 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ073 1,412
10 333N.3RDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ020 ParkingLot 211 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ468 1,126 414 LITTLEITALYBALLPARKAPARTMENTSLLC 1,432 112Ͳ21Ͳ322 1,395 614 ESCOBEDOJOSHUA 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ074 1,074
11 333N.3RDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ019 ParkingLot 212 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ469 1,394 415 MILLERJEFFREYA 837 112Ͳ21Ͳ323 837 615 CLARKJACE 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ075 1,076
12 333N.3RDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ017 ParkingLot 213 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ470 1,394 416 DILLAVOUCHRISTINA/LIEBERMANNANCY 837 112Ͳ21Ͳ324 837 616 ZWEIBACKJACOBE/ADAM/MARSHALLKIMBERLY 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ076 1,170
13 333N.3RDAVELLC 8,138 111Ͳ42Ͳ015 VacantLot 214 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ471 1,126 417 METCALFBRIAN 866 112Ͳ21Ͳ325 858 617 YAMASHITAFRED 1,042 112Ͳ42Ͳ077 985
14 333N.3RDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ011A VacantLot 215 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ472 962 418 MACKINSARAH 751 112Ͳ21Ͳ326 751 618 NZAMUKALEMA/ATOKIILEKA 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ078 1,426
15 333N.3RDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ009 VacantLot 216 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,310 112Ͳ21Ͳ473 1,310 419 BOWLESJACKA 710 112Ͳ21Ͳ327 710 619 GANUSALEXANDRU 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ079 900
16 ZAYOGROUPLLC 21,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ115 10,864 217 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,159 112Ͳ21Ͳ474 1,159 420 GRIFFINDARNEE 861 112Ͳ21Ͳ328 861 620 BUSCHSCOTT 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ080 1,020
17 JOHNEGARRETSONLIVINGTRUST/ETAL 17,478 111Ͳ42Ͳ005A ParkingLot 218 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,323 112Ͳ21Ͳ475 1,323 421 GINASANTILIVINGTRUST 960 112Ͳ21Ͳ329 953 621 PARKERDAWNMARIE/CRAIGWARREN 1,030 112Ͳ42Ͳ081 996
18 HIGGINBOTHAMPROPERTIESLLC 11,200 111Ͳ42Ͳ003 12,856 219 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ476 993 422 NORMAJEANCLIFTONSURVIVORSTRUST 1,289 112Ͳ21Ͳ330 1,289 622 DILLARDDENNISR 1,558 112Ͳ42Ͳ082 1,463
19 FOLSOMPROJECTSLLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ006 6,999 220 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ477 1,126 423 PORTERRUSSELBENTON 1,098 112Ͳ21Ͳ331 1,098 623 MCCARTHYKEVIN 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ083 1,412
20 FEDͲGSAParkingLot 21,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ007B ParkingLot 221 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ478 1,394 424 DAVISJUSTINROBERT/BETTYANNHINDERKSTR 853 112Ͳ21Ͳ332 833 624 WHITTLERGEORGETTA 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ084 1,074
21 CUNNINGHAMBUILDINGLLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ008 SeeID#22 222 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ479 1,394 425 VANCEKRISTIN 837 112Ͳ21Ͳ333 837 625 HAPPYWEARINGSHORTSTRUST 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ085 1,076
22 CUNNINGHAMBUILDINGLLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ010 10,955 223 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ480 1,126 426 MORALESGABRIEL 842 112Ͳ21Ͳ334 837 626 CATHERINEATOLBERTREVOCABLETRUST 1,142 112Ͳ42Ͳ086 1,142
23 GARRETSONJOHNE&BARTONLFABER 4,200 111Ͳ42Ͳ012 ParkingLot 224 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ481 962 427 SUMARINVESTMENTSDOWNTOWNLLC 866 112Ͳ21Ͳ335 858 627 SALESRICHARD 1,707 112Ͳ42Ͳ087 1,520
24 GARRETSONJOHNE&BARTONLFABER 8,400 111Ͳ42Ͳ013 ParkingLot 225 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,310 112Ͳ21Ͳ482 1,310 428 MELTONMICHELLE 796 112Ͳ21Ͳ336 751 628 GARLANDJEFFREYA 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ088 1,426
25 GARRETSONJOHNE&BARTONLFABER 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ016 ParkingLot 226 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,159 112Ͳ21Ͳ483 1,159 429 ALLSTATEHOMESLLC 710 112Ͳ21Ͳ337 710 629 COOPERSCOTT 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ089 900
26 JOHNEGARRETSONLIVINGTRUST/GARRETSONJOHNE 10,500 111Ͳ42Ͳ018 ParkingLot 227 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,323 112Ͳ21Ͳ484 1,323 430 SIMMONSEARL/JOHNSONAMY 797 112Ͳ21Ͳ338 861 630 ANTILLONVICTORD 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ090 1,020
27 AP355NCENTRALPROPERTYLLCC/ORAJENSHASTRI 21,675 111Ͳ45Ͳ188B 333,508 228 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ485 993 431 LEKRISTIE/SIMON 960 112Ͳ21Ͳ339 953 631 LUIJERRY/SHARON 1,030 112Ͳ42Ͳ091 996
28 APPLENINEHOSPITALITYOWNERSHIPINC. 16,760 111Ͳ45Ͳ188A 125,871 229 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ486 1,126 432 LEDBETTERGROUPLLC 1,289 112Ͳ21Ͳ340 1,289 632 CARANDANGROMEO/SHUANGYING 1,558 112Ͳ42Ͳ092 1,463
29 BURGEGOLDIEH&RICHARDW 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ025 3,508 230 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ487 1,394 433 HOWARDPARDI 1,098 112Ͳ21Ͳ341 1,098 633 KYBARTASEDMUNDR/MARLYS 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ093 1,412
30 ParcelNoLongerExistsͲMergedintoID1 231 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ488 1,394 434 RESSEGUIEWILLIAMT 833 112Ͳ21Ͳ342 833 634 SCHULTZSTEVENROBERT/ANNETTECHANG 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ094 1,074
31 EVRONͲSNYDERPATRICIAE 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ041A ParkingLot 232 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ489 1,126 435 WATSONJAN/DALEKANE 837 112Ͳ21Ͳ343 837 635 EPPERSONSARAHE 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ095 1,076
32 SCHEELABIGAILA 984 111Ͳ42Ͳ117 984 233 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ490 962 436 BELLBRENDANMICHAEL/MICHAELS/MELANIER 842 112Ͳ21Ͳ344 837 636 GORMANSTEPHENG/TRACEYANN 1,142 112Ͳ42Ͳ096 1,142
33 FERGUSONANNEYVONNE 1,100 111Ͳ42Ͳ118 1,100 234 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,310 112Ͳ21Ͳ491 1,310 437 VILLACOLBY 866 112Ͳ21Ͳ345 858 637 MARTINCHRISTOPHER 1,707 112Ͳ42Ͳ097 1,520
34 MYERSJOHN 1,358 111Ͳ42Ͳ119 1,358 235 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,159 112Ͳ21Ͳ492 1,159 438 ORPHEUMGROUPLLC 796 112Ͳ21Ͳ346 751 638 BYASBEVERLYH 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ098 1,426
35 MELISSAMCARRUTHLIVINGTRUST 1,243 111Ͳ42Ͳ120 1,243 236 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,323 112Ͳ21Ͳ493 1,323 439 KURNETAJASON 710 112Ͳ21Ͳ347 710 639 KIDDTOBY 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ099 900
36 DODGEMARIA 960 111Ͳ42Ͳ121 960 237 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ494 993 440 WESTERMANROBERT 797 112Ͳ21Ͳ348 861 640 C2ACQUISITIONS 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ100 1,020
37 VARELASEANCLAYTON/JORQUEZMAGDALENA 927 111Ͳ42Ͳ122 927 238 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ495 1,126 441 ORPHEUM807LLC 960 112Ͳ21Ͳ349 960 641 HIROTACHRISTOPH/HIGAMIAI 1,030 112Ͳ42Ͳ101 996
38 SCUTTITHEODOREJ 1,654 111Ͳ42Ͳ123 1,654 239 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ496 1,394 442 MARYMCDONOUGHLIVINGTRUST 1,289 112Ͳ21Ͳ350 1,174 642 GUTIERREZALEXSR/GAILA 1,558 112Ͳ42Ͳ102 1,463
39 COFSKYEMILYDIANE/DAVENPORTMARYR 1,310 111Ͳ42Ͳ124 1,310 240 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ497 1,394 443 MARYMCDONOUGHLIVINGTRUST 1,162 112Ͳ21Ͳ351 1,098 643 HINDMONSANDRA/WILLIAME 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ103 1,412
40 SHERMANJEFFERY 1,334 111Ͳ42Ͳ125 1,334 241 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ498 1,126 444 GEIGERJULIAN 853 112Ͳ21Ͳ352 833 644 MANZOEFRAIN 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ104 1,074
41 NORTHHOLDLLC 1,247 111Ͳ42Ͳ126 1,247 242 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ499 962 445 DMANIGROUPLLC 793 112Ͳ21Ͳ353 837 645 LESTERCHAD 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ105 1,076
42 MARASCOMICHELLEANN 1,492 111Ͳ42Ͳ127 1,492 243 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,119 112Ͳ21Ͳ592 1,119 446 CUTTERBRUCE/KERRIE 842 112Ͳ21Ͳ354 837 646 SANCHEZLEONARDO 1,142 112Ͳ42Ͳ106 1,149
43 CORENSKIMBERLYJ/PAULF 1,222 111Ͳ42Ͳ128 1,338 244 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,880 112Ͳ21Ͳ593 1,880 447 SMITHJAMES 866 112Ͳ21Ͳ355 858 647 DANAROBERTHICKSLIVINGTRUST 1,707 112Ͳ42Ͳ107 1,520
44 HAMMERSMITHTRUST 1,239 111Ͳ42Ͳ129 1,239 245 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,873 112Ͳ21Ͳ594 1,873 448 ARMENTABENNIE/MARLA 796 112Ͳ21Ͳ356 751 648 WALSHFAMILYTRUST 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ108 1,426
45 KILBEREMILY 1,291 111Ͳ42Ͳ130 1,291 246 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,119 112Ͳ21Ͳ595 2,119 449 CHAVEZRENE/MARIAG 710 112Ͳ21Ͳ357 710 649 GOSIEWSKIMARKJ 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ109 900
46 PETERSONANDREW 1,094 111Ͳ42Ͳ131 1,094 247 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ596 1,394 450 JOVELLANOSROEL 797 112Ͳ21Ͳ358 861 650 LENHANTHANH/HARUTAͲLEAKEMI 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ110 1,020
47 ESTENSONFAMILYTRUST 1,803 111Ͳ42Ͳ132 1,803 248 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ597 1,394 451 SHEDDSCOTT 960 112Ͳ21Ͳ359 953 651 MARYKAYENELLESLIVINGTRUST 1,030 112Ͳ42Ͳ111 996
48 RK1MANAGEMENTLLC 1,370 111Ͳ42Ͳ133 1,370 249 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ598 1,126 452 SUAREZJMICHAELTR 1,289 112Ͳ21Ͳ360 1,174 652 WIELAGECHARLOTTERICE/JEFFREYDAVID 1,558 112Ͳ42Ͳ112 1,463
49 ADELMANJENNIFERKAYE/GUTIERREZRICKJOSEPH 1,310 111Ͳ42Ͳ134 1,310 250 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ599 962 453 CASCIAROSANDOVALFAMILYLIVING 1,162 112Ͳ21Ͳ361 1,098 653 FOLKERTHCHERYLD/JACKD 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ113 1,412
50 3332NDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ082 ParkingLot 251 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,880 112Ͳ21Ͳ508 1,880 454 BOUCHEESHEREE 853 112Ͳ21Ͳ362 833 654 HARRISTREMAYNE 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ114 1,074
51 3332NDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ080 ParkingLot 252 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,873 112Ͳ21Ͳ509 1,873 455 HLKMANAGEMENTLLC 794 112Ͳ21Ͳ363 837 655 CAMPOSͲBAUTISTABLANCAFABIOLA 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ115 1,076
52 3332NDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ078 ParkingLot 253 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ510 993 456 RYBACKMICHAELG 843 112Ͳ21Ͳ364 837 656 MANNGEOFFREYL 1,142 112Ͳ42Ͳ116 1,149
53 3332NDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ076 ParkingLot 254 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ511 1,126 457 OBOYLEROBERTMARC 866 112Ͳ21Ͳ365 858 657 KELLYMICHAEL 1,707 112Ͳ42Ͳ117 1,520
54 3332NDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ074 ParkingLot 255 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ512 1,394 458 ALEX&COMPANYLLC 796 112Ͳ21Ͳ366 751 658 MCCOMASSCOTA/COMBSDENNISE 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ118 1,426
55 3332NDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ073 ParkingLot 256 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ513 1,394 459 BONFELDJESSEMARK/LEBOWMARGOTHAHN 710 112Ͳ21Ͳ367 710 659 MCKAYGREGORYB 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ119 900
56 3332NDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ065 ParkingLot 257 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ514 1,126 460 MERTENSSCOTTE 861 112Ͳ21Ͳ368 861 660 SCOTTKEVIN/LISA 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ120 1,020
57 3332NDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ066 ParkingLot 258 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ515 962 461 WALSHMATTHEWR 960 112Ͳ21Ͳ369 960 661 WOOGLENN/GALE 1,030 112Ͳ42Ͳ121 996
58 3332NDAVELLC 845 111Ͳ42Ͳ067 ParkingLot 259 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,880 112Ͳ21Ͳ540 1,880 462 SANMARCO77LLC 1,289 112Ͳ21Ͳ370 1,174 662 SUMMIT1205LLC 1,558 112Ͳ42Ͳ122 1,463
59 3332NDAVELLC 6,155 111Ͳ42Ͳ068 ParkingLot 260 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,880 112Ͳ21Ͳ541 1,880 463 VANRIPERMARDIMARIE 1,162 112Ͳ21Ͳ371 1,098 663 MARKTIMOTHYNELSONREVOCABLELIVINGTRUST 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ123 1,412
60 3332NDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ069 ParkingLot 261 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ542 993 464 SIGALAERICKALBERTO 737 112Ͳ21Ͳ372 833 664 NATHNEERAJ/ARCHNA 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ124 1,074
61 3332NDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ071 ParkingLot 262 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ543 1,126 465 HANSWMATHIESENTRUST 2,559 112Ͳ21Ͳ373 2,668 665 DIEWALDMICHAEL 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ125 1,076
62 3332NDAVELLC 6,300 111Ͳ42Ͳ091 ParkingLot 263 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,441 112Ͳ21Ͳ544 1,394 466 TASBLLC 3,691 112Ͳ21Ͳ374 3,691 666 MCGINNISSHANEMICHAEL 1,142 112Ͳ42Ͳ126 1,149
63 PHOENIXͲWellsFargoBuilding 52,990 111Ͳ42Ͳ106B 253,464 264 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,440 112Ͳ21Ͳ545 1,394 467 HANAGROUPLLC 1,487 112Ͳ21Ͳ583 9,445 667 ALBRIGHTFAMILYTRUST 1,707 112Ͳ42Ͳ127 1,520
64 ASUDowntownResidenceHall 9,499 111Ͳ42Ͳ087A 1,116 265 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ546 1,126 468 JYCRESTAURANTGROUPLLC 1,568 112Ͳ21Ͳ584 9,445 668 CASCIAKRISTINATRUST 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ128 1,426
65 ASUDowntownResidenceHall 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ085 3510 266 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ547 962 469 114WADAMSC103LLC 3,268 112Ͳ21Ͳ585 9,445 669 GREGORYMANDDONNAPHULBERTFAMILYTRUST 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ129 900
66 ASUDowntownResidenceHall 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ083 2853 267 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,880 112Ͳ21Ͳ548 1,880 470 HEMPIMARNMANLLC 1,706 112Ͳ21Ͳ586 9,445 670 POLLAKKEVIN 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ130 1,020
67 ASUDowntownResidenceHall 6,971 111Ͳ42Ͳ081A VacantLot 268 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,873 112Ͳ21Ͳ549 1,873 471 DAISYADAMSLLCͲC105 1,416 112Ͳ21Ͳ587 9,445 671 CHOUMICHAEL/YUENVIVIAN 1,030 112Ͳ42Ͳ131 996
68 ARIZONABOARDOFREGENTS 6,906 111Ͳ42Ͳ079A ParkingLot 269 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ550 993 472 MILSAPANDREWNELSON/FOSTERGRACEELIZABETHANN 138 112Ͳ21Ͳ588 138 672 FARRAGEMICHAELJ&CYNTHIAK 1,558 112Ͳ42Ͳ132 1,463
69 ARIZONABOARDOFREGENTS 6,921 111Ͳ42Ͳ077A ParkingLot 270 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ551 1,126 473 C107AMDC108LLC 561 112Ͳ21Ͳ589 1,169 673 HAROLDECAMPBELLIIIANDJEANETTELEECAMPBELLLIVINGTRUST 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ133 1,412
70 ASULOTNORTHOFYMCAͲABOR 6,996 111Ͳ42Ͳ075A 2,591 271 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,441 112Ͳ21Ͳ552 1,394 474 C107AMDC108LLC 184 112Ͳ21Ͳ590 1,169 674 MOONBLOSSOMINVESTMENTSFAMILYLIMITEDPARTNERSHIP 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ134 1,074
71 YMCAOFPHOENIX 21,275 111Ͳ42Ͳ064C 110,962 272 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,440 112Ͳ21Ͳ553 1,394 475 C109LLC 424 112Ͳ21Ͳ591 1,169 675 BENHARBONJULIANA 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ135 1,076
71A ASUSTUDENTRECCENTER 20,325 111Ͳ42Ͳ138 78,806 273 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ554 1,126 475A 101NORTHFIRSTAVELLC 45,319 112Ͳ21Ͳ375 591,390 676 BORSAJOSHUAA/JOHNJ/ANNEM 1,142 112Ͳ42Ͳ136 1,149
72 ASUFORMERBAILBONDSBUILDING 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ064B VacantLot 274 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ555 962 476 ParcelNoLongerExistsͲLotmerge 677 EDSONMICHAEL/MICHELLE 1,707 112Ͳ42Ͳ137 1,520
73 YMCAOFPHOENIX 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ072 110,962 275 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,880 112Ͳ21Ͳ556 1,880 477 1WESTMONROELLC 8,594 112Ͳ21Ͳ059 20,606 678 CHRISTOPHERPANDANNMSLATE2006TRUST/SLATEJESSICA 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ138 1,426
74 YMCAOFPHOENIX 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ070 SeeID#73 276 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,873 112Ͳ21Ͳ557 1,873 478 130NCENTRALLLC 6,875 112Ͳ21Ͳ057 31,373 679 TUCKERLINDSAYA 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ139 900
75 ParcelNoLongerExistsͲLotmerge 277 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ558 993 479 130NCENTRALLLC 1,719 112Ͳ21Ͳ063 SeeID#478 680 DWYERTEDL/THERESA 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ140 1,020
76 ParcelNoLongerExistsͲLotmerge 278 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ559 1,126 480 112NCENTRALNOVELCOWORKINGLLC 10,425 112Ͳ21Ͳ058 82,246 681 PALUZZIJAMES/JONESERIC 1,030 112Ͳ42Ͳ141 996
77 ParcelNoLongerExistsͲLotmerge 279 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,441 112Ͳ21Ͳ560 1,394 481 108Ͳ110NORTHCENTRALPROPERTIESLLC 5,200 112Ͳ21Ͳ061 3,772 682 ALDERKNOTTHOLDINGSLLC 1,558 112Ͳ42Ͳ142 1,463
78 JOHNEGARRETSONLIVINGTRUST/GARRETSONJOHNE 14,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ103A ParkingLot 280 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,440 112Ͳ21Ͳ561 1,394 482 RASKINRANDALLE/JENNARTR 5,000 112Ͳ21Ͳ060 11,284 683 SHUGRUETIMOTHYL/JACQUELINEL 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ143 1,412
79 PHOENIXͲCompassBank/TRANSITBLDG 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ099 ParkingLot 281 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ562 1,126 483 CSMPHOENIXDOWNTOWNLLC 20,604 112Ͳ28Ͳ133 155,072 684 WESDELLMICHAELC 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ144 1,074
80 PHOENIXͲCompassBank/TRANSITBLDG 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ097 SeeID#81 282 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ563 962 484 CSMPHOENIXDOWNTOWNLLC 6,875 112Ͳ28Ͳ039 Alley 685 BUGHPAULNICHOLAS 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ145 1,076
81 PHOENIXͲCompassBank/TRANSITBLDG 18,018 111Ͳ42Ͳ094 232,670 283 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,879 112Ͳ21Ͳ564 1,879 485 PHOENIXHOTELVENTURESLLC 6,875 112Ͳ28Ͳ037 44,621 686 TEARPAKBONNIE 1,142 112Ͳ42Ͳ146 1,149
82 ASUͲU.S.PostOffice/ASUSTUDENTUNION 78,300 111Ͳ42Ͳ061 54,265 284 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,872 112Ͳ21Ͳ565 1,872 486 PHOENIXHOTELVENTURESLLC 6,875 112Ͳ28Ͳ035 SeeID#485 687 TORRESGARCIA 1,707 112Ͳ42Ͳ147 1,520
83 PHOENIXͲPARKSCIVICSPACE 130,445 111Ͳ42Ͳ137 28,575 285 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,121 112Ͳ21Ͳ566 2,121 487 PHOENIXHOTELVENTURESLLC 6,886 112Ͳ28Ͳ038 SeeID#489 688 BURNLEYHERBERTL/LEEͲBURNLEYJANIE 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ148 1,426
84 MEANSLTDLLP 7,270 111Ͳ42Ͳ062 8,531 286 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,440 112Ͳ21Ͳ567 1,394 488 PHOENIXHOTELVENTURESLLC 6,886 112Ͳ28Ͳ040 SeeID#489 689 ENCHINTONJONATHAN 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ149 900
85 ELECTRICREDVENTURESLLC 111,688 111Ͳ42Ͳ114A Construction 287 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,441 112Ͳ21Ͳ568 1,394 489 PHOENIXHOTELVENTURESLLC 20,618 112Ͳ28Ͳ042 609,885 690 DERUEDANATHANIELPATRICK/PATRICKJ/KELLYͲDERUEDAKATERINA 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ150 1,085
86 ASUJOURNALISM/UCENTSUPERBLOCK 202,772 111Ͳ45Ͳ183 645,508 288 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,079 112Ͳ21Ͳ569 2,079 490 PHOENIXLANDLEASELLC 6,886 112Ͳ28Ͳ036 SeeID#489 691 MULVIHILLBRIANJ/GIOIACHRISTINEA 1,030 112Ͳ42Ͳ151 996
87 ParcelsplitintoID27andID28 289 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,880 112Ͳ21Ͳ570 1,880 491 HEPHOENIXLLC 90,102 112Ͳ28Ͳ044A 631,780 692 KELLYDANDSHANNONEMILLER1998TRUST 1,558 112Ͳ42Ͳ152 1,463
88 ARCPOFCPHOENIX(CENTRAL)AZLLC 48,832 111Ͳ45Ͳ189 782,912 290 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,872 112Ͳ21Ͳ571 1,872 492 PHOENIXͲCONVENTIONCENTER 718,682 112Ͳ29Ͳ094 1,636,027 693 BRADEDENNISONREVOCABLETRUST 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ153 1,412
89 ValleyYouthTheaterBuilding 7,000 111Ͳ45Ͳ066 6,930 291 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,121 112Ͳ21Ͳ572 2,121 493 PHOENIXͲHERITAGE&SCIENCEPARK(GARAGE) 417,828 112Ͳ29Ͳ090 440,020 694 LJPHOENICIANPROPERTIESLLC 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ154 1,074
90 VYTͲVACANT 7,000 111Ͳ45Ͳ065 3,500 292 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,440 112Ͳ21Ͳ573 1,394 494 PHOENIXͲHERITAGE&SCIENCEPARK(HISTORYMUSEUM) 417,828 112Ͳ29Ͳ090 440,020 695 FINCHCLARKL/CAROLJ 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ155 1,076
91 VYTͲVACANT 3,494 111Ͳ45Ͳ064A VacantLot 293 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,441 112Ͳ21Ͳ574 1,394 495 PHOENIXͲHERITAGE&SCIENCEPARK(SCIENCEMUSEUM) 417,828 112Ͳ29Ͳ090 440,020 696 STRUTHERSJOHN/CLAIRE 1,142 112Ͳ42Ͳ156 1,142
92 TAYLORPLACE 52,352 111Ͳ45Ͳ186 359,395 294 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,079 112Ͳ21Ͳ575 2,079 496 PHOENIXͲHERITAGE&SCIENCEPARK(SQUARE) 417,828 112Ͳ29Ͳ090 440,020 697 GARTENBERGART 1,707 112Ͳ42Ͳ157 1,520
93 VYTͲCITYPARKINGLOT 10,500 111Ͳ45Ͳ067 ParkingLot 295 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 4,406 112Ͳ21Ͳ576 4,406 497 PHOENIXͲNewCityHall 67,500 112Ͳ21Ͳ087 622,637 698 COLLOPYROBERT/JAMES 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ158 1,426
94 VYTͲVACANT 3,500 111Ͳ45Ͳ068 VacantLot 296 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,778 112Ͳ21Ͳ577 2,778 497 PHOENIXͲOrpheumTheatre 22,500 112Ͳ21Ͳ087 622,637 699 UNIVERSITYINVESTMENTHOLDINGSLLC 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ159 900
94A VYTͲVACANT 3,498 111Ͳ45Ͳ069A VacantLot 297 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,778 112Ͳ21Ͳ578 2,778 498 PHOENIXͲWellsFargoBuilding 36,376 112Ͳ21Ͳ014E 253,640 700 STILESALYSSA 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ160 1,020
95 SLRBLOCK23RESIDENTIALOWNERLLC 21,516 112Ͳ28Ͳ135 607,790 298 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 4,268 112Ͳ21Ͳ579 4,268 499 PHOENIXͲWellsFargoBuilding 51,781 112Ͳ21Ͳ014D 525,816 701 DRANIKOVALEN 1,030 112Ͳ42Ͳ161 996
96 BLOCK23COMMERCIALLLC 1 112Ͳ28Ͳ137 Airspace 299 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,723 112Ͳ21Ͳ580 2,723 500 TWORENAISSANCELLC 2,500 112Ͳ21Ͳ001 727,849 702 SHAPIROJARED 1,558 112Ͳ42Ͳ162 1,463
97 BLOCK23COMMERCIALLLC 48,299 112Ͳ28Ͳ134 551,243 300 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,723 112Ͳ21Ͳ581 2,723 501 TWORENAISSANCELLC 4,620 112Ͳ21Ͳ002 CommonArea 703 COPPERSQUARE1606LLC 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ163 1,412
98 BLOCK23COMMERCIALLLC 46,145 112Ͳ28Ͳ136 395,317 301 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,880 112Ͳ21Ͳ600 1,880 502 TWORENAISSANCELLC 3,500 112Ͳ21Ͳ003 CommonArea 704 MARZDAVIDMICHAEL/CHARLOTTEROSE 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ164 1,074
99 DIGITALPHOENIXVANBURENLLC 88,487 111Ͳ45Ͳ077B 376,438 302 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,873 112Ͳ21Ͳ601 1,873 503 TWORENAISSANCELLC 6,575 112Ͳ21Ͳ004 CommonArea 705 SEWELLEDWINJ/CAROLJ 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ165 1,076
100 ASUNURSINGBLOCK 86,634 111Ͳ45Ͳ182 258,732 303 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,119 112Ͳ21Ͳ602 2,119 504 TWORENAISSANCELLC 4,830 112Ͳ21Ͳ007 CommonArea 706 TERIJONESWAGNONREVOCABLETRUST 1,142 112Ͳ42Ͳ166 1,149
101 VWPEVB200GARAGELLC 42,759 111Ͳ45Ͳ087E 260,278 304 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ603 1,394 505 TWORENAISSANCELLC 11,625 112Ͳ21Ͳ008 SeeID#500 707 PONDLIVINGTRUST 1,707 112Ͳ42Ͳ167 1,520
ARTBURGERCOMPLEXSHERATONPHOENIX
44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC
102 DOWNTOWNHOTEL 123,348 111Ͳ45Ͳ175 981,015 305 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ604 1,394 506 TWORENAISSANCELLC 4,500 112Ͳ21Ͳ009 SeeID#500 708 FARAHMANDROGER 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ168 1,426
103 VWPEVB200OFFICELLC 33,678 111Ͳ45Ͳ080A 250,000 306 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ605 1,126 507 TWORENAISSANCELLC 4,500 112Ͳ21Ͳ012 SeeID#500 709 MULVIHILLJOSEPH 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ169 900
104 AGPARIZONACENTEROWNERLLC 118,265 111Ͳ46Ͳ146 87,040 307 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ606 962 508 ONERENAISSANCELLC 41,540 112Ͳ21Ͳ086 569,101 710 SIDLOWJAIMIEI 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ170 1,020
105 AGPARIZONACENTEROWNERLLC 198,690 111Ͳ46Ͳ148 230,467 308 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,880 112Ͳ21Ͳ607 1,880 509 PHOENIXͲCENTRAL&ADAMSSURFACELOT 26,193 112Ͳ28Ͳ131 ParkingLot 711 LAMBEAUMICHELLE 1,030 112Ͳ42Ͳ171 996
106 AGPARIZONACENTEROWNERLLC 63,815 111Ͳ46Ͳ138 412,981 309 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,873 112Ͳ21Ͳ608 1,873 510 424NORTHCENTRALAVELLC 7,001 112Ͳ28Ͳ130 24,871 712 ONͲCALLSOLUTIONSLLC 1,558 112Ͳ42Ͳ172 1,463
107 NADGPALMCOURTTOWERLP 39,971 111Ͳ46Ͳ141 Construction 310 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,119 112Ͳ21Ͳ609 2,119 511 AGPONENORTHCENTRALOWNERLLC 56,971 112Ͳ28Ͳ132 833,326 713 WOODRUFFJAYSONREACE/CHRISTINADARYL 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ173 1,412
108 AGPARIZONACENTEROWNERLLC 56,095 111Ͳ46Ͳ143 CommonArea 311 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ610 1,394 512 PHOENIXͲHyattGarage 20,625 112Ͳ28Ͳ071 101,251 714 EASLEYJAMESKAIMANA 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ174 1,074
109 PCPITWOARIZONALLC 46,125 111Ͳ46Ͳ132 632,852 312 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ611 1,394 513 PHOENIXͲHyattGarage 20,625 112Ͳ28Ͳ066 101,251 715 LORDEUSMAKENSLEY 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ175 1,076
110 ALDKPHOENIXLLC 49,190 111Ͳ46Ͳ139 124,539 313 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,088 112Ͳ21Ͳ612 2,088 514 THREEEONENORTHFIRSTINVESTMENTCOLL 8,941 112Ͳ28Ͳ067 SeeID#516 716 ROCHETAM 1,142 112Ͳ42Ͳ176 1,142
111 NPGPHX1AZCLLC 72,100 111Ͳ46Ͳ133 2,591 314 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,880 112Ͳ21Ͳ613 1,880 515 THREEEONENORTHFIRSTINVESTMENTCOLL 4,817 112Ͳ28Ͳ072 SeeID#516 717 DEMBECKTERRY/THOMAS 1,707 112Ͳ42Ͳ177 1,520
112 CFD2OZLLC 39,428 111Ͳ46Ͳ147 ParkingLot 315 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,873 112Ͳ21Ͳ614 1,873 516 THREEEONENORTHFIRSTINVESTMENTCOLL 3,440 112Ͳ28Ͳ073 140,714 718 MARKHFRAMPTONLIVINGTRUST 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ178 1,426
113 ABC1ͲABORͲASUͲUofA 38,230 111Ͳ46Ͳ151A 89,725 316 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,119 112Ͳ21Ͳ615 2,119 517 LIEBHABERFAMILYPARTNERSHIP 3,440 112Ͳ28Ͳ068 SeeID#516 719 BRAINARDCALEB/VOLRICHMICHELLE 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ179 900
114 XSCPHOENIXINVESTMENTLLC 54,357 112Ͳ21Ͳ974a 643,503 317 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ616 1,394 518 LIEBHABERFAMILYPARTNERSHIP 3,440 112Ͳ28Ͳ069 20,775 720 MANDTKATHYMICHELLE/CHADEDWARD 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ180 1,020
115 XSCPHOENIXINVESTMENTLLC 35,891 112Ͳ21Ͳ974b Construction 318 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ617 1,394 519 LIEBHABERFAMILYPARTNERSHIP 3,440 112Ͳ28Ͳ070 2,604 721 RINALDIMICHAEL 1,070 112Ͳ42Ͳ181 996
116 ParcelNoLongerExistsͲMergedintoID114 319 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,088 112Ͳ21Ͳ618 2,088 520 132PALALLC 3,383 112Ͳ28Ͳ074 9,249 722 BTMSREVOCABLETRUST 1,589 112Ͳ42Ͳ182 1,412
117 ParcelNoLongerExistsͲMergedintoID114 320 44MONROEMARKETINGLLC 14,946 112Ͳ21Ͳ582A CommonArea 521 CHAVESTORSLLC 3,517 112Ͳ28Ͳ075 4,138 723 MADISONALAN&DOROTHEA 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ183 1,412
118 FEDͲFederalBuilding 89,516 112Ͳ21Ͳ079A 10,000 321 MARICOPACOUNTY 27,105 112Ͳ21Ͳ072C 272,909 522 PETERGUSGLLC/SAHNASCHARLEST/KATHERINEETAL 6,884 112Ͳ28Ͳ076 14,989 724 BOREHAMAKIRA/PATRICIA 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ184 1,074
119 101NORTHFIRSTAVELLC 22,212 112Ͳ21Ͳ089A ParkingLot 322 RBPHOENIXLLC 13,351 112Ͳ21Ͳ070 78,059 523 PHOENIXͲC.GoodeBldg. 149,803 112Ͳ22Ͳ074A 225,650 725 LACHEMANNJAMES/ELIZABETH 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ185 1,076
120 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,376 112Ͳ21Ͳ376 1,376 323 VIOLALORDSMEERLP 87,750 112Ͳ28Ͳ031B 792,578 524 MARICOPACOUNTYͲOldCourthouse 56,336 112Ͳ22Ͳ075A 91,061 726 SCHMITZROBERTW 1,177 112Ͳ42Ͳ186 1,149
121 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 541 112Ͳ21Ͳ377 541 324 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ089 2,828 525 IDReassignedto777 727 AXELRODGREGORYS/HEIDI 1,707 112Ͳ42Ͳ187 1,520
122 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 726 112Ͳ21Ͳ378 726 325 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ090 2,828 526 IDReassignedto771and772 728 WHITEGREGORY 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ188 1,426
123 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,326 112Ͳ21Ͳ380 1,308 326 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ091 2,828 527 IDReassignedto773Ͳ776 729 LEEROBERT 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ189 900
124 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,159 112Ͳ21Ͳ381 1,159 327 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ092 2,828 528 LUHRSINVESTORSLLC 32,214 112Ͳ22Ͳ105b 53,222 730 ENTRUSTNEWENGLANDLLC 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ190 1,020
125 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,344 112Ͳ21Ͳ382 1,322 328 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ093 2,828 529 PEGPHXJEFFERSONSTREETLLC 13,124 112Ͳ22Ͳ105c 103,377 731 JTMTRUST 1,070 112Ͳ42Ͳ191 996
126 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,308 112Ͳ21Ͳ383 1,308 329 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ094 2,828 530 ParcelNoLongerExistsͲLotmerge 732 LEWISTONYC 1,589 112Ͳ42Ͳ192 1,412
127 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,159 112Ͳ21Ͳ384 1,159 330 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ095 2,828 531 ParcelSplitintoID's764Ͳ768 733 CHEESEMANDAVID 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ193 1,412
128 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,322 112Ͳ21Ͳ385 1,322 331 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ096 2,828 532 ParcelSplitintoID's95Ͳ98 734 HASTINGSJAY/KIMBERLY 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ194 1,074
129 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 994 112Ͳ21Ͳ386 994 332 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ097 2,828 533 IDReassignedto778 735 DIANEKSCHWILLINGLIVINGTRUST 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ195 1,076
130 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,117 112Ͳ21Ͳ387 1,126 333 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ098 2,828 534 IDReassignedto779 736 EYCHANERRICH 1,177 112Ͳ42Ͳ196 1,149
131 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 743 112Ͳ21Ͳ388 743 334 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ099 2,828 535 ParcelSplitintoID's781Ͳ785 737 GOODWINDEBRA&LINDA 1,707 112Ͳ42Ͳ197 1,520
132 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 743 112Ͳ21Ͳ389 743 335 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ100 2,828 536 IDReassignedto780 738 DUNHAMRUSSELLTOBIN 1,812 112Ͳ42Ͳ198 1,812
133 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,115 112Ͳ21Ͳ390 1,126 336 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ101 2,828 537 ParcelSplitintoID's781Ͳ785 739 BUNGERROBERT 1,405 112Ͳ42Ͳ199 1,405
134 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 965 112Ͳ21Ͳ391 965 337 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ102 2,828 538 PHOENIXͲCONVCTRSOUTH 403,744 112Ͳ30Ͳ123 351,268 740 BARTUSKASCOTT 1,418 112Ͳ42Ͳ200 1,418
135 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,310 112Ͳ21Ͳ392 1,310 338 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ103 2,828 539 PHOENIXͲCivicPlazaEastGar 236,661 112Ͳ30Ͳ127 1,219,400 741 DONATROBERT 1,899 112Ͳ42Ͳ201 1,899
136 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,159 112Ͳ21Ͳ393 1,159 339 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ104 2,828 540 MARICOPACOUNTYͲSuperiorCourtComp. 209,552 112Ͳ22Ͳ049B 807,458 742 MYLANDSTEVE 1,532 112Ͳ42Ͳ202 1,532
137 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,323 112Ͳ21Ͳ394 1,323 340 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ105 2,828 541 ParcelSplitintoID's528Ͳ529 743 OSBYEDMUNDJ/CHARLENER 1,533 112Ͳ42Ͳ203 1,533
138 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ395 993 341 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ106 2,828 542 LUHRSINVESTORSLLC 29,563 112Ͳ24Ͳ216A 142,386 744 SABATULISSA 1,981 112Ͳ42Ͳ204 1,981
139 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ396 1,126 342 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ107 2,828 542A HHLUHRSLLC 15,728 112Ͳ24Ͳ217A 240,269 745 SCHMIDTRONALD/SUSAN 1,405 112Ͳ42Ͳ205 1,405
140 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ397 1,394 343 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ108 2,828 543 JEFFERSONPLACEPARTNERSLLC 7,500 112Ͳ27Ͳ060A 47,219 746 REINSCOTT 1,418 112Ͳ42Ͳ206 1,418
141 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ398 1,394 344 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ109 2,828 544 JEFFERSONPLACEPARTNERSLLC 7,500 112Ͳ27Ͳ058A ParkingLot 747 NGOTHUY 1,796 112Ͳ42Ͳ207 1,796
142 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ399 1,126 345 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ110 2,828 545 JEFFERSONPLACEPARTNERSLLC 4,062 112Ͳ27Ͳ056B ParkingLot 748 RYANMAASENTRUST 1,532 112Ͳ42Ͳ208 1,532
143 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ400 962 346 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ111 2,828 546 JEFFERSONPLACEPARTNERSLLC 11,995 112Ͳ27Ͳ055E ParkingLot 749 RUNYONDUSTINJ 1,533 112Ͳ42Ͳ209 1,533
144 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,310 112Ͳ21Ͳ401 1,310 347 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ112 2,828 547 JOHNEGARRETSONLIVINGTRUST/ETAL 12,813 112Ͳ27Ͳ052C ParkingLot 750 BYASTRACY/BEVERLY 1,981 112Ͳ42Ͳ210 1,981
145 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,159 112Ͳ21Ͳ402 1,159 348 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ113 2,828 548 JEFFERSONPLACEPARTNERSLLC 15,000 112Ͳ27Ͳ059A ParkingLot 751 GARNIERPHILIPPE/NICOLECONSTANTINO 1,405 112Ͳ42Ͳ211 1,405
146 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,323 112Ͳ21Ͳ403 1,323 349 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ114 2,828 549 JEFFERSONPLACEPARTNERSLLC 6,875 112Ͳ27Ͳ057B ParkingLot 752 BROWNDANIELC/AMYS 1,418 112Ͳ42Ͳ212 1,418
147 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ404 993 350 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ115 2,828 550 JOHNEGARRETSONLIVINGTRUST/ETAL 20,625 112Ͳ27Ͳ053G ParkingLot 753 2204SUMMITLLC 1,796 112Ͳ42Ͳ213 1,796
148 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ405 1,126 351 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ116 2,828 551 PHOENIXͲSportsArena 374,627 112Ͳ27Ͳ114 500,201 754 WAGONERRANDALWARREN/SABRASUSANTR 1,532 112Ͳ42Ͳ214 1,532
149 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ406 1,394 352 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ117 2,828 552 SUNSLEGACYPROPERTIESLLCͲCentral 114,127 112Ͳ30Ͳ126 342,465 755 COXSARAHH 1,533 112Ͳ42Ͳ215 1,533
150 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ407 1,394 353 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ118 2,828 553 MARICOPACOUNTYSTADIUMDISTRICT 1,082,039 112Ͳ30Ͳ128E 997,437 756 THESUMMITATCOPPERSQUARELLC 25,040 112Ͳ42Ͳ216A CommonArea
151 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ408 1,126 354 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ119 2,828 554 MARICOPACOUNTYͲJailComplex 94,194 112Ͳ22Ͳ091 62,500 757 COPPERSQUARE4THSTLLC 8,337 112Ͳ42Ͳ216B 8,886
152 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ409 962 355 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ120 2,828 555 MARICOPACOUNTYͲCourtTower 130,223 112Ͳ22Ͳ035A 671,804 758 COPPERSQUARE4THSTLLC 2,267 112Ͳ42Ͳ216C 2,275
153 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,310 112Ͳ21Ͳ410 1,310 356 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ121 2,828 556 MADISON27LLC 7,913 112Ͳ22Ͳ041A ParkingLot 759 MARICOPACOUNTYͲCourtTowerPlaza 41,607 112Ͳ22Ͳ108 CommonArea
154 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,159 112Ͳ21Ͳ411 1,159 357 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ122 2,828 557 MADISON27LLC 13,750 112Ͳ22Ͳ038A 9,701 760 KLANCOINC 138 112Ͳ27Ͳ117 Alley
155 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,323 112Ͳ21Ͳ412 1,323 358 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ123 2,828 558 MARICOPACOUNTY 13,750 112Ͳ22Ͳ036 41,400 761 DESERTNECTARLLC 14,004 111Ͳ42Ͳ021A 821
156 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ413 993 359 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ124 2,828 559 SUNRISEEQUITIESLLC 19,682 112Ͳ22Ͳ103 20,844 762 ARIZONACENTERFORLAWANDSOCIETY 76,137 111Ͳ45Ͳ190 349,454
157 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ414 1,126 360 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ125 2,828 560 MARICOPACOUNTY 12,375 112Ͳ22Ͳ037 ParkingLot 763 CITYOFPHOENIXͲASUTHUNDERBIRD 25,380 111Ͳ45Ͳ191 CommonArea
158 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ415 1,394 361 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ126 2,828 561 SUNSLEGACYPROPERTIESLLC 13,750 112Ͳ27Ͳ071 VacantLot 764 ParcelNoLongerExistsͲPreviouslyAirspace
159 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ416 1,394 362 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ127 2,828 562 SUNSLEGACYPROPERTIESLLC 6,875 112Ͳ27Ͳ069 2,928 765 REDDEVELOPMENTͲCITYSCAPEOFFICERETAIL 89,330 112Ͳ27Ͳ976 550,269
160 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ417 1,126 363 VIOLALORDSMEERLP 87,750 112Ͳ28Ͳ012B 655,780 563 SUNSLEGACYPROPERTIESLLC 4,125 112Ͳ27Ͳ067 ParkingLot 766 REDDEVELOPMENTͲCITYSCAPEAPARTMENTS 3,621 112Ͳ27Ͳ977 259,901
161 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ418 962 364 PHOENIXͲHerbergerTheater(Building) 51,497 112Ͳ28Ͳ128 33,301 564 SUNSLEGACYPROPERTIESLLC 2,750 112Ͳ27Ͳ066 ParkingLot 767 REDDEVELOPMENTͲCITYSCAPEHOTEL 9,583 112Ͳ27Ͳ978 211,359
162 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,310 112Ͳ21Ͳ419 1,310 365 PHOENIXͲHerbergerTheater(Plaza) 33,963 112Ͳ28Ͳ129 CommonArea 565 SUNSLEGACYPROPERTIESLLC 6,875 112Ͳ27Ͳ064 ParkingLot 768 REDDEVELOPMENTͲCITYSCAPEPARKINGGARAGE 102,533 112Ͳ27Ͳ979 545,577
163 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,159 112Ͳ21Ͳ420 1,159 366 ROMANCATHOLICDIOCESEOFPHOENIX 186,232 112Ͳ29Ͳ091 135,520 566 SUNSLEGACYPROPERTIES 3,250 112Ͳ27Ͳ062 ParkingLot 769 PHOENIXͲBIOMEDICALCAMPUS 532,323 111Ͳ46Ͳ154 940,067
164 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,323 112Ͳ21Ͳ421 1,323 367 ASUMERCADO 167,053 112Ͳ29Ͳ089 128,580 567 SUNSLEGACYPROPERTIES 3,625 112Ͳ27Ͳ061 ParkingLot 770 PHOENIXͲBIOMEDICALCAMPUS 53,231 111Ͳ46Ͳ155 181,608
165 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ422 993 368 MOUNTAINSTATESTELEPHONE&TELEGRAPHCO 20,624 112Ͳ21Ͳ970 77,716 568 10EJACKSONLLC 12,375 112Ͳ27Ͳ072 14,638 771 PHOENIXͲCityScape(Level1)City 108,447 112Ͳ22Ͳ107B 46,270
166 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ423 1,126 369 MOUNTAINSTATESTELEPHONE&TELEGRAPHCO 16,200 112Ͳ21Ͳ972 SeeID#368 569 22EJACKSONLLC 6,875 112Ͳ27Ͳ070 6,875 772 REDDEVELOPMENTͲPARKINGLEVEL3(PARTIAL) 61,742 112Ͳ22Ͳ107B 46,270
167 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ424 1,394 370 MOUNTAINSTATESTELEPHONE&TELEGRAPHCO 48,923 112Ͳ21Ͳ973A SeeID#368 570 34EJACKSONQOZBLLC 6,875 112Ͳ27Ͳ068 41,250 773 PHOENIXRSONELLC 24,682 112Ͳ22Ͳ107C 92,540
168 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ425 1,394 371 MOUNTAINSTATESTELEPHONE&TELEGRAPHCO 442 112Ͳ21Ͳ084 SeeID#368 571 34EJACKSONQOZBLLC 6,875 112Ͳ27Ͳ065 41,251 774 PHOENIXͲCityScape(Level3)REDDevelopment 22,024 112Ͳ22Ͳ107D 92,540
169 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ426 1,126 372 EQUUSELLISLIMITEDPARTNERSHIP 9,174 112Ͳ21Ͳ050F 58,626 572 34EJACKSONQOZBLLC 6,875 112Ͳ27Ͳ063 SeeID#571 775 PHOENIXͲCityScape(Level4)REDDevelopment 98,999 112Ͳ22Ͳ107E 92,540
170 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ427 962 373 GVW111MONROEOWNERLLC 32,188 112Ͳ21Ͳ050H 378,016 573 241WJACKSONSTREETLLC 6,875 112Ͳ22Ͳ015 ParkingLot 776 PHOENIXͲCityScape(Level5)REDDevelopment 40,782 112Ͳ22Ͳ107F 92,540
171 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,310 112Ͳ21Ͳ428 1,310 374 PHXINVESTMENTPROPERTIESLLC 20,699 112Ͳ21Ͳ278 111,890 574 241WJACKSONSTREETLLC 6,875 112Ͳ22Ͳ014 ParkingLot 777 CITYSCAPERETAIL 96,167 112Ͳ22Ͳ107A 459,991
172 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,159 112Ͳ21Ͳ429 1,159 375 ESPACO2118LLC 5,560 112Ͳ21Ͳ279 ParkingLot 575 ARIZONAHOUSINGINC 27,511 112Ͳ22Ͳ104 129,533 778 COLLIERCENTERPT,LLCͲC/OGEASSETMANAGEMENTINC. 165,450 112Ͳ27Ͳ120 496,350
173 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,323 112Ͳ21Ͳ430 1,323 376 114ADAMSLLC 857 112Ͳ21Ͳ284 837 576 COMMUNITYLEGALSERVICESINC 17,188 112Ͳ22Ͳ008D 13,457 779 COLLIERCENTERPT,LLCͲC/OGEASSETMANAGEMENTINC. 65,831 112Ͳ27Ͳ121 61,488
174 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ431 993 377 CHARLEMANGEDAVID 1,030 112Ͳ21Ͳ285 1,030 577 RCHCLLC 6,875 112Ͳ22Ͳ004 6,875 780 COLLIERCENTERPT,LLCͲC/OGEASSETMANAGEMENTINC. 25,137 112Ͳ27Ͳ123 536,452
175 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ432 1,126 378 BERNARDEZMICHAEL 1,835 112Ͳ21Ͳ286 1,706 578 RCHCLLC 6,875 112Ͳ22Ͳ003 6,875 781 COLLIERCENTERPT,LLCͲC/OGEASSETMANAGEMENTINC. 16,592 112Ͳ27Ͳ985 19,844
176 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ433 1,394 379 LIZARDLEGLLC 883 112Ͳ21Ͳ287 876 579 MARICOPACOUNTY 10,313 112Ͳ22Ͳ001 2,704 782 COLLIERCENTERPT,LLCͲC/OGEASSETMANAGEMENTINC. 10,089 112Ͳ27Ͳ986 CommonArea
177 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ434 1,394 380 LADWIGJODY 1,110 112Ͳ21Ͳ288 1,110 580 ANJERLLC 54,050 112Ͳ22Ͳ974 ParkingLot 783 COLLIERCENTERPT,LLCͲC/OGEASSETMANAGEMENTINC. 9,503 112Ͳ27Ͳ987 CommonArea
178 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ435 1,126 381 BEALSMATHEW 726 112Ͳ21Ͳ289 755 581 1EJACKSONLLC 6,776 112Ͳ27Ͳ108 6,770 784 COLLIERCENTERPT,LLCͲC/OGEASSETMANAGEMENTINC. 29,398 112Ͳ27Ͳ988 524,298
179 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ436 962 382 GRAZIANOJOSEPHLIVINGTRUST 1,915 112Ͳ21Ͳ290 1,798 582 39EJACKSONLLC 34,382 112Ͳ27Ͳ107D 60,000 785 COLLIERCENTERPT,LLCͲC/OGEASSETMANAGEMENTINC. 2,433 112Ͳ27Ͳ989 39,262
180 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,310 112Ͳ21Ͳ437 1,310 383 FIERROSKATIEA 870 112Ͳ21Ͳ291 839 583 KLANCOINVESTMENTLLC 13,615 112Ͳ27Ͳ116 14,894 786 PHOENIXͲCANCERCENTER 70,013 111Ͳ46Ͳ153 222,983
181 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,159 112Ͳ21Ͳ438 1,159 384 MARYMADGECIAMPOLILIVINGTRUST 1,753 112Ͳ21Ͳ292 1,660 584 NIXDTLLC 6,875 112Ͳ28Ͳ138 Construction 787 PHOENIXͲTRIANGLEFORSTAGING 38,777 111Ͳ46Ͳ156 VacantLot
182 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,323 112Ͳ21Ͳ439 1,323 385 OKUNAMITROY 789 112Ͳ21Ͳ293 837 585 ParcelNoLongerExistsͲMergedintoID584 789 PHOENIXͲWEXFORDSOUTHPARKINGLOT 89,081 111Ͳ44Ͳ145 ParkingLot
183 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ440 993 386 SAHAHOLDINGSLLC 799 112Ͳ21Ͳ294 837 586 ParcelNoLongerExistsͲMergedintoID584 791 PHOENIXͲWEXFORDPARKINGLOT 44,997 111Ͳ44Ͳ146A ParkingLot
184 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ441 1,126 387 DELEONLOUISARMANDO 823 112Ͳ21Ͳ295 858 587 ParcelNoLongerExistsͲMergedintoID584 792 PHOENIXͲWEXFORDBUILDING 44,997 111Ͳ44Ͳ146B 262,219
185 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ442 1,394 388 AGENTERTRAVIS 792 112Ͳ21Ͳ296 751 588 PHOENIXCENTERFORDENTISTRYLLC 13,750 112Ͳ27Ͳ111E ParkingLot 793 PHOENIXͲBIOMEDICALCAMPUSSTAGINGLOT 89,875 111Ͳ44Ͳ147 ParkingLot
186 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ443 1,394 389 SWANMATTHEWTHOMAS 710 112Ͳ21Ͳ297 710 589 PHOENIXCENTERFORDENTISTRYLLC 27,530 112Ͳ27Ͳ115 25,133 790 MARICOPACOUNTYͲBIOSCIENCEHIGHSCHOOL 89,822 111Ͳ44Ͳ143 84,120
187 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ444 1,126 390 STACIOKASFAMILYTRUST 1,254 112Ͳ21Ͳ298 1,200 590 301JACKSONLLC 20,625 112Ͳ30Ͳ120 ParkingLot 788 ASUͲHOUSEONNORTHENDOFTRIANGLE 7,500 111Ͳ46Ͳ081A 1,656
188 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ445 962 391 LOOMISBUDDYANN 751 112Ͳ21Ͳ299 751 591 SHIELDSPATRICKMIV/ALICIAL 1,418 112Ͳ42Ͳ051 1,418 794 UAͲLOTNORTHOFCANCERCENTER 5,896 111Ͳ44Ͳ104 VacantLot
189 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,310 112Ͳ21Ͳ446 1,310 392 TRIPLECHOLDINGSLLC 1,307 112Ͳ21Ͳ300 1,174 592 MONTGOMERYGRACEN 866 112Ͳ42Ͳ052 900 795 UAͲLOTNORTHOFCANCERCENTER 5,896 111Ͳ44Ͳ105 VacantLot
190 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,159 112Ͳ21Ͳ447 1,159 393 GUERREROERICA 1,214 112Ͳ21Ͳ301 1,098 593 STECKMANBRIANGEORGE 998 112Ͳ42Ͳ053 1,020 796 UAͲLOTNORTHOFCANCERCENTER 5,896 111Ͳ44Ͳ106 VacantLot
191 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,323 112Ͳ21Ͳ448 1,323 394 DESYLVATONYARTHUR 1,794 112Ͳ21Ͳ302 1,718 594 ROSSMATTHEWS 943 112Ͳ42Ͳ054 996 797 UAͲLOTNORTHOFCANCERCENTER 5,896 111Ͳ44Ͳ107 VacantLot
192 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ449 993 395 LIDDYPROPERTIESLLC 805 112Ͳ21Ͳ303 837 595 TAYLORFAMILYREVOCABLETRUST 1,446 112Ͳ42Ͳ055 1,463 798 UAͲLOTNORTHOFCANCERCENTER 5,896 111Ͳ44Ͳ108 VacantLot
193 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ450 1,126 396 ROZHINIMANI 854 112Ͳ21Ͳ304 837 596 JOHNSONRICHARD 1,579 112Ͳ42Ͳ056 1,412 799 UAͲLOTNORTHOFCANCERCENTER 5,896 111Ͳ44Ͳ109 VacantLot
194 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ451 1,394 397 RAKKEVIN 872 112Ͳ21Ͳ305 858 597 BECKHAMZACKARYKRISTIAN 1,078 112Ͳ42Ͳ057 1,078 800 UAͲLOTNORTHOFCANCERCENTER 5,302 111Ͳ44Ͳ110 VacantLot
195 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ452 1,394 398 HAWANASIXLLC 792 112Ͳ21Ͳ306 751 598 ISAACJODYS 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ058 1,426 801 UAͲLOTNORTHOFCANCERCENTER 5,342 111Ͳ44Ͳ111 VacantLot
196 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ453 1,126 399 CURTISPHAMANNFAMILYTRUST 710 112Ͳ21Ͳ307 710 599 JACOBSENTHOMAS 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ059 900 802 UAͲLOTNORTHOFCANCERCENTER 5,382 111Ͳ44Ͳ112 VacantLot
197 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ454 962 400 SNITZTREVOR 1,200 112Ͳ21Ͳ308 1,200 600 KACZALATIMOTHY/NANCY 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ060 1,020 803 UAͲLOTNORTHOFCANCERCENTER 5,358 111Ͳ44Ͳ113 VacantLot
198 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,310 112Ͳ21Ͳ455 1,310 401 BRODERICKTHOMAS 751 112Ͳ21Ͳ309 751 601 VILLESCASNICHOLAS/JENNIFER 1,030 112Ͳ42Ͳ061 996 804 UAͲLOTNORTHOFCANCERCENTER 5,358 111Ͳ44Ͳ114 2,614
199 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,159 112Ͳ21Ͳ456 1,159 402 UNDERWOODJOHNM 1,174 112Ͳ21Ͳ310 1,174 602 GANUSALEXANDRU 1,558 112Ͳ42Ͳ062 1,463 805 UAͲLOTNORTHOFCANCERCENTER 5,358 111Ͳ44Ͳ115 VacantLot
200 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,323 112Ͳ21Ͳ457 1,323 403 SHEADIANAL 1,098 112Ͳ21Ͳ311 1,098 603 NYEBRADLEYA 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ063 1,412
201 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ458 993 404 SEVERINOROBERT 1,395 112Ͳ21Ͳ312 1,395 604 CARAMBERISVANESSA 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ064 1,074




PAGE2KEY:
ASSESSMENTID#'S
1Ͳ805

CHANGESSINCETHECREATIONOFTHEPRIORDIAGRAM
PARCELOWNERSHIPCHANGESASOF04/06/23


UPDATESMADEON12.27.23




Page 120



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Law Enforcement Badges and Accessories Equipment Contract - VH11592 -
Amendment (Ordinance S-50751)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 150984 with Municipal Emergency Services, Inc for the
purchase of badges and accessories for the Police, Fire and Parks and Recreation
departments. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $65,000.

Summary
This contract provides badges and accessories with a designated serial number for
sworn and non-sworn employees who are required to wear a serialized badge with a
uniform. The badges are worn to notify the public of what agency is being represented
and who the individual employee is, in accordance with the serial number.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on Sept. 30, 2024.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $65,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $625,000. Funds are available in the Police, Fire and Parks
and Recreation departments' budgets.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Law Enforcement Badges and Accessories - Contract 150984 (Ordinance S-46027)
on Sept. 18, 2019.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays, Deputy City Manager John
Chan and the Police, Fire and Parks and Recreation departments.




Page 121



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Fire Code Amendment Change (Ordinance G-7242)

Request to approve revisions to the Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix.
These revisions will update and correct existing regulations, simplify the permitting
process, and adjust fees associated with implementing renewable energy systems.

Summary
The City of Phoenix adopted the 2018 International Fire Code in 2019. Since then, the
Fire Code has been revised to ensure its continual relevance and modernization for
requirements and protective measures. The Fire Code is the foundation of the Fire
Department's ability to safeguard and mitigate risks for our community and first
responders. Beyond the Fire Code's primary role, the code is pivotal in supporting and
fostering growth within our community. As community risk profiles change, the Fire
Code must evolve to remain relevant to the best practices in community risk reduction.

The Fire Department uses a standard process to assess the need for amendments to
the Fire Code that focuses on openness, transparency, balancing interests, and
building partnerships. The proposed amendment packet results from extensive
stakeholder feedback and alignment with the Fire Department's goals and mission.
The Fire Safety Advisory Board, which serves on behalf of the City Council as an
advisory board for matters relating to Fire Prevention, voted unanimously in favor of
this amendment packet after more than 15 hours of review, public meetings, and
discussions.

This amendment packet (Attachment A) encompasses updates and changes across
three key areas:

1. Corrections to address identified clerical errors that arose during the publishing and
formatting of the original Fire Code. These errors fall into two categories: numbering
errors, where section numbering sequences were inadvertently adjusted or reset,
and grammar and sentence structure errors. These corrections have been made
and will help ensure transparency in enforcement and compliance with the Fire
Code.
2. Updates to keep pace with the evolving landscape of materials and industry trends
to support development growth without causing construction delays.


Page 122

Simultaneously, these revisions incorporate technological advancements and
industry developments within the commercial and industrial sectors. For example,
the fast-growing and evolving battery energy storage sector is central to the
amendment. By incorporating the latest national fire codes and industry standards
for batteries and their systems, we elevate our community protection while
safeguarding our first responders.
3. Modifications to the fee schedule to simplify the permitting process and adjust fees
associated with implementing renewable energy systems. The result is a more
efficient process for requestors and city staff. While this measure is anticipated to
result in a modest reduction in revenue, the significant benefits to our customers,
industry partners, and staff far outweigh the decrease in fee-based revenues.

The Fire Department will release updates to the codes in both English and Spanish,
enhancing outreach and accessibility for the community. This update marks the final
packet of amendments, as the department will start collaborating with the Planning and
Development Department on adopting the 2024 International Codes.

Financial Impact
The financial impact on the city will be a slight decrease in fee-based revenue,
estimated at around $76,200 per year.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Public Safety and Justice Subcommittee recommended approval of this item on
Jan. 3, 2024.

Public Outreach
In compliance with Arizona Revised Statutes section 9-499.15, which mandates the
posting of new fee proposals, the proposed fee changes outlined in this amendment
packet have been publicly displayed for 60 days on the City's official website and 15
days on the City's social media platforms.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.




Page 123
ATTACHMENT A




Amendment Packet to the
Fire Preven�on Code of the City of Phoenix
(Currently No. G-6854, § 1, 2021)




Page 124
Sec�on 1
Fire Code Amendment Change Summary




Page 125
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment,
Clarification, & Consistency Change Proposals


The currently adopted Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix (Phoenix Fire Code) is based
on the 2018 International Fire Code. As of today, the 2024 edition will be released later this year
and possibly ready for City adoption in 2025. To ensure the Fire Prevention Code of the City of
Phoenix is both effective and relevant to today’s first responders, communities, and
development needs; adoption of new amendments to the current adopted edition are required.
Therefore, we bring forth amendments to the current Phoenix Fire Code to ensure the code
continues to represent the newest in technology, standards, and lessons learned to protect our
first responders and community while also providing for a development encouraged
environment. These codes are designed to mitigate fire hazards, protect life and property, and
promote a safer environment for everyone. By adhering to and enforcing these regulations, we
significantly reduce the risk of fire-related incidents and their potentially devastating
consequences. Fire codes encompass a wide range of measures that address fire prevention,
detection, suppression, and evacuation procedures. They dictate requirements for building
materials, electrical systems, fire alarm systems, sprinkler systems, emergency exits, and much
more. These regulations are based on extensive research, new scientific understanding, and
lessons learned from past fire incidents. These provisions are especially critical in large public
spaces, such as entertainment venues, bars and restaurants, hospitals, shopping malls, and
high-rise buildings, where the rapid evacuation of a significant number of people is essential.
Additionally, fire codes address fire prevention measures to reduce the likelihood of fire related
incidents. They mandate the installation and maintenance of fire suppression systems, including
fire extinguishers, sprinkler systems, and fire alarms, ensuring early detection and rapid
response. Regular inspections and maintenance of these systems further enhance their
effectiveness. By adhering to modern and updated fire codes, we create a culture of safety that
permeates throughout our community. Proper, adaptive, and updated fire code adoption also
enhances the community's resilience by reducing the risk of fire-related disasters and their
associated economic, environmental, and social impacts. By valuing and enforcing fire safety
measures, we create a safer environment for everyone, protecting lives, property, and the
vitality of our community as a whole.


These changes have been designed to optimize outcomes and deliver mutual benefits to all
stakeholders. Careful consideration has been given to balancing the interests of different
parties, ensuring fairness, and maximizing positive impacts. Furthermore, the changes have
been meticulously assessed for their potential risks and unintended consequences. Preemptive
actions have been taken to mitigate any negative effects, and alternative solutions have been
explored and incorporated where necessary to ensure a smooth transition for all stakeholders.
The following is a brief summary of the changes located in this document along with stakeholder
information when relevant. The attached Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix




Page 126
Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change Tracker outlines and expresses each change
and their specific rationale for the change and effects on the city and our community.


Summary of Changes


Construction and Operational Permit Changes

Items #1 – 10 & 67
• We have taken the necessary steps to remove repetitive and incorrect wording from
permit requirements, aiming to minimize confusion and prevent any potential
misunderstandings or misapplications for our customers and community. It is important
to note that these actions do not result in the creation of any new permits.
• The proposed changes will have no adverse effects on any stakeholder involved.
Through careful planning, consideration, and comprehensive analysis, the changes have
been designed to ensure minimal disruption and maximum benefit for all parties
involved.


Assessment Fee Changes

Items #11-12
• We have rectified clerical publishing errors that unintentionally combined two
assessment fees, namely hazardous materials and outdoor combustible materials.
Additionally, we have addressed the inadvertent assignment of assessment fees for
undeveloped non-hazardous areas on properties. These corrections were necessary to
ensure accurate and appropriate assessment of fees in accordance with the respective
categories and conditions.
• Our stakeholders primarily include facilities involved in hazardous material and outdoor
combustible storage. It is important to note that these changes do not result in any
operational adjustments to assessment fees. The purpose of these amendments is
solely to rectify clerical errors found in the original code publication. Furthermore, these
changes have been carefully designed to enhance outcomes and foster mutual benefits
for all stakeholders involved.


Fire Safety Advisory Board

Items #13
• Recently the Fire Safety Advisory Board (FSAB) adopted their first set of by-laws. These
by-laws were previously based on the Phoenix Fire Code sections relating to the FSAB
and its operations. After adoption of the by-laws, this section of the fire code is being
altered to reflect the removal of the items now found in these documents.




Page 127
• The FSAB, as the stakeholder, has unanimously approved the by-laws.



Appeals and Property Liens

Items #14-17
• We have made the decision to remove the appeal filing time limits and the statement
regarding liens from the code. The current version of the code suggested that there were
specific time limits for filing appeals, and implied that pursuing customer action beyond
those limits was not a valid option. Initially, this approach was intended to expedite and
encourage compliance with the fire code. However, Fire Prevention now has a
comprehensive compliance policy in place, which includes well-defined time limits for
achieving compliance and the imposition of penalties for noncompliance.
As for the issue of liens, it is essential to clarify that the lien process is a separate legal
procedure available to the Fire Prevention department. It is not specifically linked to the
"appeals" process. The specific details and procedures concerning liens are addressed
outside the scope of the Phoenix Fire Code.
• Any individual or entity whose operations fall under the regulation of the Phoenix Fire
Code can be considered a stakeholder affected by these changes. These amendments
bring benefits to both stakeholders and end users of our services by providing an
extended timeframe to submit an appeal. This revised approach replaces the current
provision in the code, which restricts options to appeal after a 30-day period. By allowing
additional time for appeals, we aim to enhance accessibility and fairness in our
processes, ensuring that stakeholders have a meaningful opportunity to exercise their
rights.


Fire Code Violation and Penalty Requirements

Items #18-27
• We have undertaken the implementation of these changes to harmonize the penalties
section of the current Phoenix Fire Code with the rules, procedures, and standards
established by the City of Phoenix Courts and Arizona State Law. These modifications
were executed through a collaborative effort with the Phoenix Fire Department's attorney
and City of Phoenix Prosecutors, aiming to accurately reflect the prescribed
consequences and measures outlined in the code. Our paramount objective remains the
assurance of code compliance and the protection of our community's well-being




Page 128
Definitions

Items #28-29
• Adding two new definitions for items found in this code adoption packet (Items #33 & 41)


Roof Top/Landscaped Roof Requirements

Item #30
• This adjustment reflects the national code language changes from “rooftop gardens” to
“landscaped roofs.”
• The proposed change will have no adverse effects on any stakeholder involved.



Excavations and Trenches

Items #31-32
• This change eliminates the provision in the Phoenix Fire Code that mandates trenches
and excavations to adhere to specific Federal requirements. It is important to note that
these activities are already regulated by the Federal CFR Codes and OSHA. By
removing this requirement, we maintain the ability of Fire Department staff to address
unsafe conditions without imposing the burden of Federal inspection requirements on
Fire Inspectors or the City of Phoenix.


Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing)

Item #33
• This newly introduced section in the currently published International Fire Code (which
serves as the foundation for the Phoenix Fire Code) specifically focuses on 'industrial'
3D printing. It is important to distinguish this category from tabletop machine printing
conducted in commercial, home, or hobby settings. The 'industrial' 3D printing process
involves the utilization of hazardous chemicals and materials, which can potentially pose
risks to operators and the surrounding community.
• This represents a burgeoning industry in large-scale manufacturing, characterized by
ongoing growth and development. As this industry continues to evolve and new locations
emerge, the Fire Prevention is committed to actively engaging with stakeholders. Our
aim is to establish collaborative partnerships, foster effective communication, and ensure
that appropriate fire safety measures are implemented to address the unique
requirements of this emerging sector.




Page 129
Trade Shows and Exhibits

Item #34
• This particular code statement serves to provide clarity regarding the utilization of
Phoenix Fire Code Appendix N for the regulation of trade shows and exhibits. Since the
adoption of the 2018 Phoenix Fire Code, the requirements outlined in Appendix N have
been effectively employed. This newly introduced code statement aims to solidify the
official recognition of Appendix N as an integral and adopted component of the Phoenix
Fire Code
• The stakeholders affected by this amendment would include the individuals or entities
involved in operating, managing, and hosting trade shows and exhibits. It is important to
note that this amendment does not introduce any alterations to the application or
enforcement of the existing Phoenix Fire Code. Instead, its purpose is to provide clarity
and ensure that the current code is correctly interpreted and implemented in relation to
trade shows and exhibits.


Fire Safety Evacuation Plans and Procedures

Items #35-37
• This amendment encompasses clerical adjustments related to occupant names, titles,
and other minor revisions in alignment with the current International Fire Code (which
serves as the foundation for the Phoenix Fire Code). These changes specifically pertain
to emergency plans and procedures. The purpose of these modifications is to ensure
accuracy and consistency in documentation, thereby enhancing the effectiveness and
clarity of emergency preparedness measures.


Fire Department Access and Operations

Items #38-41
• These changes are to correct a clerical publishing error for address identification and to
alter language and requirement for passing of emergency radio coverage systems to
match current International Fire Codes language).
• These changes specifically address a critical necessity for buildings to ensure the
operational functionality of emergency responder radio systems in designated 'critical
areas.' This newly introduced requirement, derived from the 2021 International Fire
Code, aims to establish secure and reliable radio coverage for first responders, including
police and fire personnel, operating within buildings. It is important to note that the
installation and testing of these radio systems are already mandated by the current
Phoenix Fire Code. However, these changes provide an additional layer of protection by
emphasizing the importance of testing and installation specifically in 'critical areas.'




Page 130
Examples of such critical areas include stairwells and fire control rooms, which are
essential locations where firefighters and law enforcement are anticipated to be present
and carry out operations during emergency situations.
• Fire Prevention is committed to collaborating with building designers, owners,
developers, and managers to facilitate a comprehensive understanding of the testing
requirement and the significant benefits it brings to building and occupant safety. Our
objective is to establish effective communication channels and provide guidance
throughout the process, ensuring that all stakeholders are well-informed and equipped to
achieve a positive outcome in terms of enhancing the safety and well-being of the
building's occupants.


Building Life Safety Systems and Components

Items #42-49
• These changes primarily pertain to building fire protection systems and their various
components. They encompass the incorporation of the latest 2021 International Fire
Code requirements, as well as adjustments made to the existing Phoenix Fire Code. The
overarching goal of these changes is to reinforce community safety and prioritize the
well-being of first responders. By aligning with current standards and making necessary
enhancements, we aim to ensure effective fire protection measures that mitigate risks
and enhance overall safety within our community.
• Fire Prevention is dedicated to fostering collaboration with building designers, owners,
developers, and managers to facilitate a thorough comprehension of the maintenance
requirements and the substantial benefits they offer for building and occupant safety. Our
primary aim is to establish robust communication channels and deliver comprehensive
guidance throughout the entire process. By ensuring that all stakeholders are well-
informed and equipped, we strive to achieve a positive outcome that enhances the
safety and well-being of the building's occupants.
Mazes

Item #50
• These changes to the code section numbering were made to rectify a clerical error that
occurred during the publishing process. It is important to note that these corrections do
not introduce any regulatory changes to the code. The sole purpose of these
modifications is to ensure accuracy and consistency in the numbering system for
improved clarity and ease of reference.
• No stakeholder interests identified or anticipated as this amendment has no change to
the application or enforcement of the Phoenix Fire Code.




Page 131
Hazardous Materials

Items #51-52
• These changes to the code section numbering were made to rectify a clerical error that
occurred during the publishing process. It is important to note that these corrections do
not introduce any regulatory changes to the code. The sole purpose of these
modifications is to ensure accuracy and consistency in the numbering system for
improved clarity and ease of reference.
• No stakeholder interests were identified or anticipated as this amendment has no
change to the application or enforcement of the Phoenix Fire Code.


National Standards Referenced

Item #53
• The Phoenix Fire Code incorporates national standards to establish industry-specific
requirements within the fire code. Given that these national standards continually evolve
in response to technological advancements, industry developments, and lessons
learned, it is crucial to adopt and incorporate these reference standards accordingly. By
aligning with the latest standards, we ensure that the Phoenix Fire Code remains up to
date, effectively addressing emerging challenges and promoting enhanced fire safety
practices.


Emergency Response Planning

Item #54
• When responding to emergencies, time is a critical factor in the ability of first responders
to facilitate successful emergency operations and results. The ability to preplan and
understand a buildings’ critical life safety features are an integral part of this component
of response. Current Phoenix Fire Code (Sections 404 Emergency Plans and 407
Hazard Communications) requires building operators and owners to produce some
information relating to their building designs, layouts, and system locations/features
based on occupancy type. However, the fire code currently falls short in its ability to
ensure first responders have critical information relating to facilities. This missing
information encompasses the locations of fire department connections (FDC), fire
sprinkler riser rooms, standpipe locations, fire fighter breathing air locations, smoke
control and evacuation panel locations, blind elevator shafts, and similar system
locations and access points.




Page 132
Energy Storage Systems (ESS), Photovoltaic (Solar), and Portable Generators

Items #55-65
• These changes encompass the correction of clerical errors as well as several updates
derived from the latest edition of the International Fire Code, upon which the Phoenix
Fire Code is based. The energy sector is a rapidly expanding and evolving industry,
necessitating codes that can keep pace with technological and industrial advancements.
These amendments not only prioritize the protection and safety of our community and
first responders but also foster a development-friendly environment. By aligning our
codes with industry advancements, we strive to promote innovation while ensuring the
well-being and resilience of our community.
Appendix D

Item #66
• As referenced prior, time is a critical factor in the ability of first responders to facilitate
successful emergency operations and results. Access for emergency vehicles is a critical
component to that cycle or response. Fire code requires these critical fire access roads
be marked and identified based on their design and size. Prior to the 2013 adoption of
the Phoenix Fire Code, access specific details were contained in an “Access Details
Manual” that provided specification as to the design requirements of these access
markings. After the 2013 adoption these details were incorporated in the Phoenix Fire
Code as appendix D. This action had the unintended consequence of delaying approval
of industry and material advancements when it related to access as changes to these
details and designs now required City Council action. This action reverts that change
and moves the details to the Emergency Access Details Book. Appendix D will stay in
the Phoenix Fire Code and will reference the details in this book as applicable.




Page 133
Sec�on 2
Fire Code Amendment Detailed Change Log




Page 134
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Proposed Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

All measures have been taken to ensure accurate numbering of code sections in this document. However, it is
important to note that once final approval and adoption take place, the numbering sequence may undergo
changes. It is important to emphasize that such changes will not have any regulatory implications of the code.




Action Taken By:
Fire Safety Advisory Board Date 9/25/2023
Approved as Submitted Modified and Approved Denied No Action Taken
Public Safety & Justice Subcommittee Date 1/3/2024
Approved as Submitted Modified and Approved Denied No Action Taken
Approved as Submitted Modified and Approved Denied No Action Taken

1. 105.6.13 Exhibits and trade shows. An operational permit is required to
operate exhibits and trade shows as regulated by Appendix N.

Exception: Exhibits less than 100 aggregate square
feet (9290 mm2).

Action and Reason: This is a removal of the exception in chapter 1 that requires
all trade shows and exhibits over 100 square feet (sqft) to obtain a Phoenix Fire
Department operational permit. After this action, the fire code will default to the
base code requirement of permitting found in appendix N for trade shows and
exhibits greater than 1,500 sqft in buildings with no automatic fire sprinkler system
and 4,500 sqft in buildings with an automatic fire sprinkler system.





Page 135
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

2. 105.6.17 Floor finishing. An operational permit is required for floor finishing or
surfacing operations exceeding 350 square feet (33 m2) using Class I
or Class II liquids. Buildings under construction or renovation with a
valid construction permit do not require a permit to conduct this
activity. The activity shall be performed in accordance with this
section.

Action and Reason: Removal of a clerical mistype inadvertently added to the
adopted code.

Results of Action for City and Community: Reduces possible confusion over what
“section” applies.


3. 105.6.36 Outdoor assembly event. An operational permit is required to
conduct an outdoor assembly event where planned attendance
exceeds 500 persons, or where 50 or more persons are in a
confined area. confining 50 or more persons by temporary
installation of fencing or barrier.

Action and Reason: Alter the text to align with the code’s definition of an outdoor
assembly. Change from “confined area” to “by temporary installation of fencing.”

Results of Action for City and Community: This action eliminate the possible
permitting requirement for venues who utilize already approved and established areas
on their property for gatherings.

4. 105.6.51.17 Medical facilities. An operational permit is required to operate a
State of Arizona Department of Health Services (DHS) Licensed
patient treatment medical facility.





Page 136
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

Action and Reason: Add Arizona State DHS to define medical facilities requiring
permits. Original intent of this permit was to inspect facilities that requested fire
inspections due to their state licensed requirements from Arizona DHS. It was not
intended to require all medical facilities to obtain an operational permit.

Results of Action for City and Community: This action clarifies the specific types of
facilities that are required to have an operational permit rather than requiring all
medical locations to obtain one.

5. 105.6.51.18 Semiconductor facilities. An operational permit is required to
operate a semiconductor facility that is not part of an HPM
facility.




Action and Reason: Removal of fire code semiconductor operational permit
requirement found in 105.6.51.18. Current Phoenix Fire Code (a Phoenix
amendment) as adopted has a requirement for an operational permit for HPM
Facilities. HPM facilities are semiconductor facilities by code definition. This results in
code as currently adopted, having two permits for the same operation type.

Results of Action for City and Community: Action removes the unintentional
possible double permitting and billing for these types of semiconductor facilities.

6. 105.7.26.10 Fire lines & hydrants. A construction permit is required for the
installation or modification of fire lines that serve fire protection
systems, fire hydrants, or any combination thereof.




Action and Reason: Remove the word “hydrants.” Hydrant construction permits are
covered in code in section105.7.19. This section was intended to be specific to fire
lines only.


Page 137
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed


Results of Action for City and Community: This action removes the possibility of
unintentional double permits required for same construction item (hydrants).

7. 105.7.26.10.2 Hydrant, temporary. A construction permit is required for the
installation of a temporary hydrant(s) and up to 500 feet (152 m)
of and fire line.




Action and Reason: Remove the reference to 500 ft. This distance was only
intended to relate to permit fees calculated for each 500 ft section and is referenced in
the fee schedule currently.

Results of Action for City and Community: This action removes what could be a
500 ft cap on permits that would negatively affect the development community and
project growth.

8. 105.7.25 Temporary membrane structures and tents. A construction
permit is required to erect an air-supported temporary
membrane structure, a temporary stage canopy or a tent
having an area in excess of 800 square feet (74 m2).
Exceptions:

1. Tents used exclusively for recreational camping purposes.
2. Funeral tents and curtains, or extensions attached thereto,
when used for funeral services.
3. Tents and awnings open on all sides, which comply with all
of the following:
3.1. Individual tents shall have a maximum size of 1,200
square feet (111 m2).
3.2. The aggregate area of multiple tents placed side by side


Page 138
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

without a fire break clearance of not less than 12 feet (3658
mm) shall not exceed 1,200 square feet (111 m2) total.
3.3. A minimum clearance of 12 feet (3658 mm) to structures
and other tents shall be maintained.

Reserved

Action and Reason: Removal of this “construction permit” for temporary tents and
membrane structures from the fire code. Section 105.6.47 of the fire code currently
requires an operational permit for temporary tents and membrane structures. This
“construction” permit is a duplicate to the already required operational permit.

Results of Action for City and Community: This action removes the unintentional
possible double permitting and billing for these types of tents and temporary
membrane structures.

9. 105.7.26.11 Lithium ion battery systems. To install or
modify a lithium ion battery storage system used for
facility standby power emergency power or uninterruptible
power supplies as regulated by Section 1206.2.

Reserved

Action and Reason: Removal of this specific permitting text for lithium battery
systems. This was a clerical duplicate to the permit requirement found already in code
section 105.7.2.

Results of Action for City and Community: This action removes the duplicate
permit requirement statement and clarifies the single construction permit required for
battery systems.





Page 139
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

10. 105.7.26.12 Smoke and heat vents. A construction
permit is required to install, alter or modify smoke and
heat vents.

Reserved

Action and Reason: Removal of this specific permitting text. This was a clerical
duplicate to the permit requirement found already in code section 105.7.20

Results of Action for City and Community: This action removes the duplicate
permit requirement statement and clarifies the single permit required for smoke and
heat vents.

11. 106.9 Assessment fees. The fire code official is authorized to assess fees
annually for: agro-industrial or solid biomass facilities and pallet yards
when material quantities meet those listed in the Fire Prevention
Fee Schedule Agro-Industrial, Solid Biomass, and Pallet Fee
Assessment Table

The fire code official is authorized to assess fees annually for:
hazardous materials or substances when quantities reach reportable
quantities in accordance with Fire Prevention Fee Schedule
Hazardous Materials Assessment Classification Table 8107.1; or
hazardous material facilities with areas larger than 250,000
square feet (23 225 m2) that represent a special hazard as
determined by the fire code official.

Action and Reason: This “assessment fees” section contained two separate types of
assessment fees. One for outdoor combustibles facilities (agro, biomass, and pallet
yards) and the other for hazardous materials. Unfortunately, as the code was printed,
it combined them into one paragraph and resulted in confusion for our customers as
to the specific types of activities and their fees. This clerical change separates them
into their two categories.


Page 140
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

The code also referenced the old fee schedule that was part of the fire code as
Chapter 81 prior to 2021. In 2021 Council action removed this fee schedule from the
fire code and created a stand alone fee schedule document with the same
assessment fees included.
The third change is in reference to facilities with more than 250,000 sq ft; which was a
duplicate statement to section 106.10. Its removal clarifies and reduces possible
customer confusion on requirements.

Results of Action for City and Community: This action does not alter or create fees
or requirements. It only assists to clarify the location of such fees and removes
duplicate code statements.

12. 106.10 Area assessment fees. Facilities that represent special hazards as
determined by the fire code official shall be assessed an area
assessment fee. Facilities more than 250,000 square feet (23,225
m2) shall be assessed an additional fee calculated on the total area
of the developed site. The assessment fee shall be calculated in
intervals of 250,000 square feet (23,225 m2) in accordance with the
fee schedule. For those facilities being assessed hazardous material
fees, area fees will be based on the fee group on in accordance with
Fire Prevention Fee Schedule Area Assessment Fee Table.
8106.3.

Action and Reason: Add “developed” text to the calculation utilized for fees. It was
intended to only charge a fee based on the area the facility uses, not undeveloped
land on said property. Secondly, the old reference to chapter 81 (8106.3) fees is
removed to reflect the current fire prevention fee schedule table location.

Results of Action for City and Community: Eliminates the possible fee assessment
for undeveloped land that poses no significant hazard to the community or first
responders.





Page 141
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

13. 109.1 [A] 109.1 Fire Safety Advisory Board. In order to hear and
decide appeals of orders, decisions or determinations made by
the fire code official relative to the application and interpretation
of this code, there shall be and is hereby created the Fire Safety
Advisory Board. Hereinafter called “the Board,” it shall consist of
up to 13 members, a majority of whom are residents of the City
of Phoenix. Board members shall be United States citizens. One
board member’s only qualification shall be Phoenix residency,
while other board members shall be drawn from the following
industries, trades and professions: fire-protection systems
contractor; architect; realtor; developer; petroleum industry;
liquefied petroleum gas industry; property insurance; fire-
protection engineering; owner or manager of a business that
would not qualify for membership in another industry; health
care industry; special events coordinator; and construction
contractor. The Board shall be appointed by the governing body
and shall hold office at its pleasure. The fire code official shall be
an ex officio member of said board but shall not have a vote on
any matter before the Board. The Board shall adopt and
operate in accordance with City Procesures, Board by-laws,
and adopted Fire Code rules of procedure for conducting its
business and shall render all decisions and findings in writing to
the appellant with a duplicate copy to the fire code official.

Action and Reason: Removal of text from fire code that is now adopted in by-laws
for the Fire Safety Advisory Board.

Results of Action for City and Community: Eliminates the possible conflict as
changes are made to the board’s by-laws versus fire code.





Page 142
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

14. 109.74 Appeal to the Fire Marshal. An appeal shall be submitted to
the Fire Marshal in writing. Appeals shall be made within 30
days of receipt of a notice of noncompliance indicating
required corrections.



Action and Reason: Removal of 30-day requirement to submit an appeal to the Fire
Marshal. Fire Prevention has established procedures for the enforcement and
compliance of fire code violations. This progressive process utilizes inspection notices
and can include up to civil/criminal citations. This 30-day requirement is no longer in
line with current procedures or policies and can have a negative effect on obtaining
compliance and the customer ability to correct violations.

Results of Action for City and Community: Eliminates the possible conflict with
Department policy and a customer’s inability to submit an appeal after 30-days.

15. 109.85 Appeal to the Fire Safety Advisory Board. Any person may appeal
a decision of the Fire Marshal to the Fire Safety Advisory Board
following the decision of the Fire Marshal. The appellant shall appear
to present the appeal to the Board. The appeal shall be made
within 30 days of receiving a decision from the Fire Marshal.

Action and Reason: Removal of 30-day requirement to submit an appeal to the Fire
Safety Advisory Board. Fire Prevention has established procedures for the
enforcement and compliance of fire code violations. This progressive process utilizes
inspection notices and can include up to civil/criminal citations and may last longer
than 30 days. This 30-day requirement is no longer in line with current procedures or
policies.

Results of Action for City and Community: Eliminates the possible conflict with
Department policy and a customer’s inability to submit an appeal after 30-days.




Page 143
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

16. 109.96 Appeal to the Superior Court. Any persons aggrieved by a
decision of the Board may at any time within 30 days after the
Board’s decision file an appeal with the Superior Court of the
county by following the various methods of appeal or review
procedures as set forth by the applicable statutes of the State of
Arizona.

Action and Reason: Removal of the 30-day requirement in current Phoenix Fire
Code. The Phoenix Fire Code does not regulate or have authority over the
procedures of filling timelines of the Arizona Superior court.

Results of Action for City and Community: Eliminates the possible conflict or
inaccurate direction for court filings.

17. 109.7.1 Property Liens. A property lien may be placed on properties
when appeal stipulations are granted for extended periods
of time.




Action and Reason: Removal of this section. The City and its individual departments
are otherwise authorized to place liens, and it is not required to be set forth in the Fire
Code.

Results of Action for City and Community: There is a legal procedure for placing a
lien. Elimination of the section ensures no conflict between fire code and those
procedure(s).





Page 144
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

18. 110.3 Notice of violation or civil citation. Where the fire code official finds
a building, premises, vehicle, storage facility or outdoor area that is in
violation of this code, the fire code official is authorized to prepare
and issue a written notice of violation or civil citation describing the
conditions deemed unsafe and, where compliance is not
immediate, specifying a time for reinspection. in violation.
Nothing herein shall require the issuance of a notice of violation
prior to commencement of emergency abatement, the issuance
of a citation or civil or criminal violation proceedings.

Action and Reason: In conjunction with the Fire Department’s Legal Council and
the City of Phoenix Prosecutors, this section has been modified to more accurately
reflect procedures and actions set forth by the Fire Code, Municipal Codes, and
Court procedures and rules.

Results of Action for City and Community: These changes will reduce possible
conflict between Fire Code, Municipal Codes, and Court procedures and rules.

19. 110.3.1 Service of notice of violation. A notice of violation issued pursuant
to this code shall be served on the owner, the owner’s authorized
agent, operator, occupant or other person responsible for the
condition or violation, either by personal service, mail, e-mail or by
delivering the same to, and leaving it with, some person of
responsibility on the premises. For unattended or abandoned
locations, a copy of such notice of violation shall may be posted on
the premises in a conspicuous place at or near the entrance to such
premises and the notice of violation shall be mailed by certified
mail with return receipt requested or a certificate of mailing, to
the last known address of the owner, the owner’s authorized
agent, or occupant further served in accordance with this
section.

Action and Reason: In conjunction with the Fire Department’s Legal Council and
the City of Phoenix Prosecutors, this section has been modified to provide more
clarity and more accurately reflect procedures and actions set forth by the Fire

Page 145
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

Code, Municipal Codes, and Court procedures and rules.

Results of Action for City and Community: These changes will reduce possible
conflict between Fire Code, Municipal Codes, and Court procedures and rules.

20. 110.3.2 Service of civil citation. A civil citation issued pursuant to this
code shall be served on the owner, the owner’s authorized
agent, operator, occupant or other person responsible for the
condition or violation, either by personal service, mail, or by
delivering the same to, and leaving it with, some person of
responsibility on the premises. For unattended or abandoned
locations, a copy of civil citation shall be posted on the premises
in a conspicuous place at or near the entrance to such premises
and the civil citation shall be mailed by certified mail or
registered mail, with return receipt requested. Service of civil
citations may also be accomplished as provided under rule 2.3
of the Local Rules of Practice and Procedure for the City of
Phoenix Municipal Court.
Action and Reason: In conjunction with the Fire Department’s Legal Council and
the City of Phoenix Prosecutors, this section has been modified to provide more
clarity and more accurately reflect procedures and actions set forth by the Fire
Code, Municipal Codes, and Court procedures and rules.

Results of Action for City and Community: These changes will reduce possible
conflict between Fire Code, Municipal Codes, and Court procedures and rules.

21. 110.4 Compliance with orders, citations and notices. A building,
premises or thing shall not be used when in violation of this code as
noted on a tag order or notice in accordance with Section 104.5. A
notice of violation or civil citation issued or served as provided by
this code shall be complied with by the owner, the owner’s authorized
agent, operator, occupant or other person responsible for the
condition or violation to which the notice of violation or civil citation
pertains. In case of extreme danger to persons or property,


Page 146
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

immediate compliance is required. Each day that a violation
continues may be deemed a separate violation.




Action and Reason: In conjunction with the Fire Department’s Legal Council and
the City of Phoenix Prosecutors, this section has been modified to provide more
clarity and more accurately reflect procedures and actions set forth by the Fire
Code, Municipal Codes, and Court procedures and rules.

Results of Action for City and Community: These changes will reduce possible
conflict between Fire Code, Municipal Codes, and Court procedures and rules.

22. 110.5 Cumulative proceedings and remedies. If violations are not
promptly remedied, the fire code official is authorized to request
the legal counsel of the jurisdiction to institute the appropriate
legal proceedings at law or in equity to restrain, correct or abate
such violation or to require removal or termination of the
unlawful occupancy of the structure in violation of the
provisions of this code or of the order or direction made
pursuant hereto. The proceedings and remedies are cumulative
and the City may proceed to seek one or more such remedies.


Action and Reason: In conjunction with the Fire Department’s Legal Council and
the City of Phoenix Prosecutors, this section has been modified to provide more
clarity and more accurately reflect procedures and actions set forth by the Fire
Code, Municipal Codes, and Court procedures and rules.

Results of Action for City and Community: These changes will reduce possible
conflict between Fire Code, Municipal Codes, and Court procedures and rules.




Page 147
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

23. 110.6 Civil Violations. Any person, firm or corporation who causes,
permits, facilitates, aids or abets any violation of this code, or
who fails to perform any act or duty required by this code, is
subject to a civil sanction of not less than $500 nor more than
$2,500. Each day that a violation continues may be deemed a
separate violation.

110.3.4 Civil actions or criminal citations. Any person,
firm or corporation who causes, permits, facilitates, aids or
abets any violation of this code, or who fails to perform
any act or duty required by this code, is subject to a civil
sanction of not less than $500 nor more than $2,500 or a
Class 1 criminal misdemeanor.



Action and Reason: In conjunction with the Fire Department’s Legal Council and
the City of Phoenix Prosecutors, this section has been modified to provide more
clarity and more accurately reflect procedures and actions set forth by the Fire
Code, Municipal Codes, and Court procedures and rules.

Results of Action for City and Community: These changes will reduce possible
conflict between Fire Code, Municipal Codes, and Court procedures and rules.

24. 110.7 Criminal Violations. Any person, firm or corporation who causes,
permits, facilitates, aids or abets any violation of this code, or
who fails to perform any act or duty required by this code shall
be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Each day that a violation
continues may be deemed a separate violation.

110.3.4 Civil actions or criminal citations. Any person,
firm or corporation who causes, permits, facilitates, aids or
abets any violation of this code, or who fails to perform
any act or duty required by this code, is subject to a civil
sanction of not less than $500 nor more than $2,500 or a

Page 148
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

Class 1 criminal misdemeanor.




Action and Reason: In conjunction with the Fire Department’s Legal Council and
the City of Phoenix Prosecutors, this section has been modified to provide more
clarity and more accurately reflect procedures and actions set forth by the Fire
Code, Municipal Codes, and Court procedures and rules.

Results of Action for City and Community: These changes will reduce possible
conflict between Fire Code, Municipal Codes, and Court procedures and rules.

25. 110.3.4.1 Commencement of civil action. Any civil action to
enforce the provisions of this code shall be
commenced, and summons shall be issued, in accordance
with the procedures set forth in Arizona Revised
Statutes or city ordinances, or as provided in the Local
Rules of Practice and Procedure—City Court—City of
Phoenix.

110.3.4.2 Admission or denial of allegations; hearing;
findings of Court; civil sanctions.
1. A person served with a civil citation or complaint
shall appear at the time and place stated in the
citation or summons, or may appear prior to the
time, and admit or deny the allegations of the
complaint. Allegations not denied at the time of
appearance are deemed admitted.
2. If the allegations are admitted, the Court shall
enter judgment for the City and impose a civil
sanction.
3. If the person denies the allegations, the Court


Page 149
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

shall set the matter for hearing. Civil hearings are
informal and held without a jury, and the City of
Phoenix is required to prove the violation
charged by a preponderance of the evidence.
Technical rules of evidence do not apply, except
for statutory provisions relating to privileged
communications. If the person elects to be represented
by counsel, the person shall so notify the
Court at least 10 days prior to the hearing date.
Hearings may be recorded. If the Court finds in
favor of the person, the Court shall enter an order
dismissing the citation or complaint. If the Court finds in favor of
the City, the Court shall enter
judgment for the City and impose a civil sanction.
4. If the person served with a civil citation or complaint
fails to appear on or before the time
directed to appear or at the time set for hearing by
the Court, the allegations shall be deemed admitted
and the Court shall enter judgment for the
City and impose a civil sanction.

110.3.4.3 Criminal penalties. Where in any section of
this code the doing of any act is required, prohibited or
declared to be unlawful, any person, firm or corporation
who shall be convicted of a violation of any such
section shall be guilty of a Class I misdemeanor.

110.3.4.4 Injunctive Relief. The imposition of any
civil action or criminal penalty provided in this Code
shall not preclude the fire code official from instituting
any appropriate action or proceeding to require compliance
with the provisions of this Code and with administrative
orders and determinations made hereunder. In
the event that any building, structure, occupancy, or
equipment is erected, constructed, reconstructed,

Page 150
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

altered, repaired, converted, demolished, moved or
maintained, or any building, structure, premises or system
service is used or occupied in violation of this
Code, the fire code official may institute any appropriate
action or proceedings to prevent unlawful erection,
construction, reconstruction, alteration, repair, removal,
demolition or utilization a building, occupancy, premises
or system regulated by this code.

[A] 110.4 Violation penalties. Persons who shall violate a
provision of this code or shall fail to comply with any of the
requirements thereof or who shall erect, install, alter, repair or
do work in violation of the approved construction documents
or directive of the fire code official, or of a permit or certificate
used under provisions of this code, shall be guilty of a
Class 1 criminal misdemeanor punishable by a civil sanction
of not less than $500 per day nor more than $2,500 per day.
Each day that a violation continues after due
Action and Reason: In conjunction with the Fire Department’s Legal Council and
the City of Phoenix Prosecutors, this section has been modified to provide more
clarity and more accurately reflect procedures and actions set forth by the Fire
Code, Municipal Codes, and Court procedures and rules.

Results of Action for City and Community: These changes will reduce possible
conflict between Fire Code, Municipal Codes, and Court procedures and rules.

26. 110.8 Abatement of violation. In addition to the imposition of the
penalties herein described, the fire code official is authorized to
institute appropriate action to prevent unlawful construction or
to restrain, correct or abate a violation; or to prevent illegal
occupancy of a structure or premises; or to stop an illegal act,
conduct of business or occupancy of a structure on or about
any premises.

Abatement of violation. In addition to the

Page 151
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

imposition of the penalties herein described, the fire code
official is authorized to institute appropriate action to prevent
unlawful construction or to restrain, correct or abate a
violation; or to prevent illegal occupancy of a structure or
premises; or to stop an illegal act, conduct of business or
occupancy of a structure on or about any premises.
Action and Reason: In conjunction with the Fire Department’s Legal Council and
the City of Phoenix Prosecutors, this section has been modified to provide more
clarity and more accurately reflect procedures and actions set forth by the Fire
Code, Municipal Codes, and Court procedures and rules.

Results of Action for City and Community: These changes will reduce possible
conflict between Fire Code, Municipal Codes, and Court procedures and rules.

27. 110.8.1 Abatement orders. The Municipal Court of the City of Phoenix
shall have jurisdiction to issue orders to the property owner of
record, as recorded in the Maricopa County Recorder’s Office, to
abate unsafe conditions or any other violation of this Code, or to
issue orders permitting the City of Phoenix to abate unsafe
conditions as
defined in this Code. Abatement orders may be issued by the
Municipal Court pursuant to a request from the fire code official,
or may be initiated by the Court in addition to any civil sanction
or criminal penalty assessed for violations of this Code.

Abatement orders. The Municipal Court of the
the property owner of record, as recorded in the Maricopa
County Recorder’s Office, to abate unsafe conditions or
any other violation of this Code, or to issue orders permitting
the City of Phoenix to abate unsafe conditions as
defined in this Code. Abatement orders may be issued by
the Municipal Court pursuant to a request from the fire
code official, or may be initiated by the Court in addition


Page 152
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

to any civil sanction or criminal penalty assessed for violations
of this Code.




Action and Reason: In conjunction with the Fire Department’s Legal Council and
the City of Phoenix Prosecutors, this section has been modified to provide more
clarity and more accurately reflect procedures and actions set forth by the Fire
Code, Municipal Codes, and Court procedures and rules.

Results of Action for City and Community: These changes will reduce possible
conflict between Fire Code, Municipal Codes, and Court procedures and rules.

28. 202 3D PRINTER. A machine used in the additive manufacturing
process for fabricating objects through the deposition of a
material using a print head, nozzle or other printer technology.




Action and Reason: Add a recent national code definition that is not in current
adopted Phoenix Fire Code. Commercial/industrial 3D printers are a new requirement
in the base 2021 International Fire Code and the definition is not in currently adopted
Phoenix Fire Code.

Results of Action for City and Community: 3D printer requirements are proposed
to be added to section 322 of the Phoenix Fire Code and this action provides a
definition for 3D printer.





Page 153
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

29. 202 CRITICAL AREAS. Areas that are designated for the highest
level of emergency responder radio coverage including but not
limited to areas such as exit stairs, exit passageways, elevator
lobbies, fire protection equipment room and control valve
locations, and fire command centers.

Action and Reason: Add a recent national code definition that is not in current
adopted Phoenix Fire Code. This term “critical area” is used in the proposed updated
section 510.4.1 of the Phoenix Fire Code.

Results of Action for City and Community: This action provided clarity as to the
definition of “critical areas.”

30. 317.2 Rooftop garden or Landscaped roof size. Rooftop garden or
Landscaped roof areas shall not exceed 15,625 square feet
(1,450m2) in size for any single area with a maximum dimension of
125 feet (39m) in length or width. A minimum 6-foot-wide (1.8m)
clearance consisting of a listed Class A rated roof system
complying assembly tested with ASTM E108 or UL 790 shall be
provided between adjacent rooftop gardens or landscaped roof
area.

Action and Reason: This change of terminology acknowledges that the scope and
intent of plants and foliage installed on rooftops is broader than the common definition
of “garden”. There is no change to requirements to allow for a variety of horticulture to
be installed other than classical garden plants.

Results of Action for City and Community: Allows for a greater variety of
horticultural installation while not changing the previous requirements.





Page 154
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

31. 320.2.1 Excavations and trenches. Excavations and
trenches shall be in accordance with Title 29, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 1926.650-1926.652, Subpart P.




Action and Reason: Removes the section that requires excavations and trenches
comply with Federal regulations (Title 29, Part 1926.650-1926.652, subpart P). The
Phoenix Fire Department does not enforce Federal Title 29. The original intent of the
section was to provide a code section for the Phoenix Fire Department to deem
unsafe excavations and trenches as so, and the ability to order their evacuation and
hazard abatement. With the wording of the current section, it could place an
enforcement requirement of Federal law(s) onto the Phoenix Fire Department. Current
Phoenix Fire Code section 320.2.3 already allows the Phoenix Fire Department to
deem an excavation or trench as unsafe and order an evacuation and abate the
condition without the Title 29 reference.

Results of Action for City and Community: There is no level of change to our
community from a service or protection aspect with this proposed change, as the
ability to ensure excavations and trenches that are unsafe are evacuated and hazards
abated still exists in Phoenix fire Code.

32. 320.2.2 Confined spaces. Confined spaces shall be in
accordance with Title 29, Code of Federal Regulations,
Part 1910.




Action and Reason: Removes the section that requires confined spaces comply with
Federal regulations (Title 29). The Phoenix Fire Department does not enforce Federal
Title 29. The original intent of the section was to provide a code section for the
Phoenix Fire Department to deem unsafe confined spaces as so, and the ability to
order their evacuation and hazard abatement. With the wording of the current section,


Page 155
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

it could place an enforcement requirement of Federal law(s) onto the Phoenix Fire
Department. Current Phoenix Fire Code section 320.2.3 already allows the Phoenix
Fire Department to deem a confined space as unsafe and order an evacuation and
abate the condition without the Title 29 reference.

Results of Action for City and Community: There is no level of change to our
community from a service or protection aspect with this proposed change, as the
ability to ensure confined spaces that are unsafe are evacuated and hazards abated
still exists in Phoenix Fire Code.

33. 322 ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING (3D PRINTING)

General. Additive manufacturing equipment and operations shall
comply with Section 322.

322.1.1 Scope. Additive manufacturing shall comply with one of
the following:
1. Nonindustrial additive manufacturing shall comply with
Section 322.2.
2. Industrial additive manufacturing shall comply with
Section 322.3

322.1.2 Installation, operation and maintenance. 3D printers and
associated additive manufacturing equipment shall be installed,
operated and maintained in accordance with this code, the
listing and the manufacturer’s instructions.

322.1.3 Production materials. Only the production materials
listed for use with the equipment and included in the
manufacturer’s instructions shall be used.

322.2 Nonindustrial additive manufacturing. Nonindustrial
additive manufacturing equipment and operations shall comply

Page 156
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

with Sections 322.2.1 and 322.2.2. Additive manufacturing
equipment and operations that do not comply with Section 322.2
shall comply with Section 322.3.

322.2.1 Listing. 3D printers used in nonindustrial additive
manufacturing shall be listed and labeled in accordance with
UL2011, UL 60950-1 or UL 62368-1. The listing shall also verify:
1. The 3D printers are self-contained and utilize maximum
30-liter prepackaged production materials.
2. The operation of the 3D printers shall not create a
hazardous
(classified) electrical area or zone outside the unit.
3. If any hazardous (classified) electrical area or zone exists
inside the unit’s outer enclosure, the area shall be protected by
intrinsically safe electrical construction or other acceptable
protection methods.
4. The 3D printers shall not utilize inert gas or an
external combustible dust collection system.


322.2.2 Occupancies. Nonindustrial additive manufacturing
shall be permitted in all occupancy groups.

322.3 Industrial additive manufacturing. Industrial additive
manufacturing equipment and operations shall comply with
Sections 322.3.1 through 322.3.12.

322.3.1 Permits required. Permits shall be obtained from the
fire code official in accordance with Section 105.5 prior to
engaging in industrial additive manufacturing operations.




Page 157
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

322.3.2 Listing. 3D printers used in industrial additive
manufacturing shall be listed and labeled in accordance with
UL 2011 or approved for the application based on a field
evaluation conducted by an approved agency.

322.3.3 Combustible dusts and metals. Industrial additive
manufacturing operations that store, use or produce
combustible dust, combustible particulate solids or
combustible metals shall comply with Chapter 22 and this
section.

322.3.4 Powder evaluation. Printing powders used in industrial
additive manufacturing operations shall be tested for
combustibility in accordance with NFPA 484 or NFPA 652 as
applicable. A copy of test reports shall be provided to the fire
code official upon request.

322.3.5 Combustible (nonmetallic) dusts. Industrial additive
manufacturing operations that store, use or produce
combustible (nonmetallic) dusts shall comply with NFPA 654.

322.3.6 Combustible metals. Industrial additive manufacturing
operations that store or use combustible metals shall comply
with NFPA 484.

322.3.7 Ancillary equipment. Ancillary equipment provided
for recycling, sieving, vacuuming or handling combustible
powders shall be designed and approved for such use.

322.3.8 Hazardous materials. Industrial additive manufacturing
operations that store or use hazardous materials exceeding the



Page 158
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

maximum allowable quantity limits shall comply with Chapter
50.

322.3.9 Inert gas. Additive manufacturing processes that utilize
inert gases shall comply with Chapter 53. Ventilation or gas
detection shall be provided in accordance with Section 5307.

322.3.10 Technical assistance. Where required by the fire code
official, a report evaluating the acceptability of technologies,
processes, products, facilities, materials and uses associated
with the operation shall be provided in accordance with
Section 104.9 and approved

322.3.11 Performance-based design alternative. Where
approved by the fire code official, buildings and facilities where
industrial additive manufacturing is performed shall be
permitted to comply with the performance-based design
options in Section 5001.3 as an alternative to compliance
with the other requirements set forth in this section.

320.3.12 Occupancies. Industrial additive manufacturing shall
be conducted only in the occupancy groups associated with
manufacturing operation and permitted by the Chapter 50
maximum allowable quantity tables. Where approved, the
requirements in Section 322.3.6 shall be permitted to provide
the technical basis for determining compliance with Table
5003.1.1(1), Note q.

Action and Reason: Adding 3D printer requirements from the base 2021
International Fire Code to the current Phenix Fire Code that is based on the 2018
International Fire Code. As material and manufacturing technology improve, adapt,
and change, the fire code needs to adapt at the same pace to meet the needs and
expectations of our development community. Clear sizing of exempted amounts of


Page 159
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

product and listed equipment guidelines narrows the requirement for permitting to
commercial rather than personal levels of 3-D printers. The guidelines provided in
these sections give a predictable path to successful installation and prescriptive
guidelines that previously required a special engineered report and use of the Appeals
process to address this new technology while allowing for that performance-based
design alternatives as the technology continues to evolve.

Results of Action for City and Community: This action allows for clear guidance
for proper and safe installation of 3-D printing equipment without requiring the
engineering evaluation of smaller units, reflecting the wide use of these printers in
schools and homes.

34. 323 Trade Shows and Exhibits. Trade Shows and Exhibits shall conform
to Appendix N.




Action and Reason: This adopts the International Fire Code Appendix N that
regulates and permits trade shows and exhibits. These activities can present a unique
fire danger based on their contents, layout, booth construction, and large attendance.
Prior to this appendix creation, the Phoenix Fire Code had a specific trade show
section. This aligns Phoenix Fire Code with the national fire code.

Results of Action for City and Community: There are no event design or setup
enforcement, or requirement changes based on adopting this appendix. This change
serves to clarify the section for trade shows and exhibits in the Phoenix Fire Code.





Page 160
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

35. 403.10.3.1 Fire safety and evacuation plan. The fire safety and evacuation
plan required by Section 404 shall include special employee
actions, including fire protection procedures necessary for
residents, and shall be amended or revised upon admission of a
resident with unusual needs. a description of staff actions. Plans
shall include procedures necessary for full evacuation of care
recipients and shall be amended or revised upon admission of
care recipients with unusual needs.

Action and Reason: Rewording of code language to better clarify and express
requirements of the safety and evacuation plan.

Results of Action for City and Community: Provided clarity for operations and
facilities that are required to comply with this section base on their facility design or
use.

36. 403.10.3.1.1 Fire safety plans. A copy of the plan shall be maintained at the
facility at all times. Plans shall include the following in addition to the
requirements of Section 404:
1. Location and number of resident sleeping rooms.
2. Location of special locking or egress control arrangements

Action and Reason: Rewording of code language to better clarify and express
requirements of the safety and evacuation plan.

Results of Action for City and Community: Provided clarity for operations and
facilities that are required to comply with this section based on their facility design or
use.





Page 161
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

37. 403.10.3.2 Employee training. Employees shall be periodically instructed and
kept informed of their duties and responsibilities under the plan.
Records of instruction shall be maintained. Such instruction shall be
reviewed by employees at intervals not exceeding two months. A
copy of the plan shall be readily available at all times within the
facility. Training of new staff shall be provided promptly upon
employment. Staff shall be instructed in the proper use of
portable fire extinguishers.

Action and Reason: Rewording of code language to better clarify and express
requirements of the safety and evacuation plan.

Results of Action for City and Community: Provided clarity for operations and
facilities that are required to comply with this section base on their facility design or
use.

38. 503.3.2 Fire apparatus access road signs. Required fire apparatus access
road markings less than 36 feet (10972 mm) wide shall be
identified by fire lane signs (see Appendix D) and red curbs on both
sides of the road as follows:



Action and Reason: Removal of a clerical mistype inadvertently added to this
section. Sections 503.3.3, 503.3.4, and 503.3.5 already state the width of roads in
comparison to their fire lane signage and red curb requirements.

Results of Action for City and Community: The action clarifies the code
requirements for fire lanes and removes the unintended requirement for fire lanes on
both sides of roads less than 36 ft.





Page 162
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

39. 505.1.2 Commercial occupancies. Premises identification shall be provided
for Group A, B, E, F, H, I, M, S and U occupancies. The building
identification is required to be internally or externally illuminated
to meet visibility requirements in low or no light conditions.



Action and Reason: Adding illumination text to the section. This requirement for
illumination is currently found in the immediately following section 505.1.2.1 and the
intent was to apply to all commercial addressing (505.1.2.1, 5.5.1.2.2, and 505.1.2.3).
However, due to a clerical mistype, it was inadvertently placed in the wrong section at
print.

Results of Action for City and Community: This action will ensure that address
numbering at commercial locations, that are critical to reducing emergency response
times, are visible in low and no light conditions.

40. 505.1.2.1 Buildings less than 200 feet. Buildings less than 200 feet (60,960
mm) long and less than 100 feet (30,480 mm) from the edge of the
road shall be identified with a building address that is not less than 12
inches (305 mm) high with a minimum 2-inch (51 mm) brush stroke
on a contrasting background. The address shall be visible from all
access directions. The building identification is required to be
internally or externally illuminated.

Action and Reason: This item is to be correctly moved to the code section
referenced in item #39 of this document.

Results of Action for City and Community: This action will ensure that address
numbering at commercial locations, that are critical to reducing emergency response
times, are visible in low and no light conditions.





Page 163
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

41. 510.4.1 Emergency responder communication enhancement coverage
system signal strength. The building shall be considered to have
acceptable in-building, two-way emergency responder
communications enhancement system coverage when where signal
strength measurements in 95 percent of all areas and 99 percent of
areas designated as critical areas by the fire code official on
each floor of the building meet the signal strength requirements in
Sections 510.4.1.1 through 510.4.1.3.

Action and Reason: Rewording of code language to better clarify and express
requirements of Emergency Responder Communications Coverage systems.
Coincides with latest terminology of latest referenced standards which allow for
greater flexibility in radio coverage installations.

Results of Action for City and Community: These systems provide first
responders the ability to communicate on portable radios in buildings that would
otherwise not be possible due to the buildings size, height, or construction material
used. These systems are critical for first responders’ safety. These changes
strengthen the safety factor for “critical areas” like stairwells in buildings by increasing
the signal requirements from 95% to 99%.

42. 703.2 Repair of penetrations. Where damaged, materials used to
protect membrane- and through-penetrations shall be replaced
or restored with materials or systems that meet or exceed the
code requirements applicable at the time when the assembly
was constructed, remodeled or altered.

Action and Reason: Adding a new section from the 2021 International Fire Code
that addresses items not previously clarified in current code.

Results of Action for City and Community: Provided clarity for operations and
facilities that repair damage to fire rated barriers to ensure the barrier maintains
required listing and protection factor.


Page 164
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

43. 901.4.6.3 Environment. Automatic sprinkler system riser rooms and fire pump
rooms shall be maintained at a temperature of not less than 40ºF
(4ºC) and not more than 100ºF (37ºC). All fire protection
equipment in the room/space shall be listed for the temperatures
anticipated in the space/room. If equipment listing temperatures
and/or manufacture specifications fall below the anticipated
maximum room/space temperatures, then cooling shall be
provided to meet equipment listing. Heating and cooling units
shall be permanently installed.

Action and Reason: The intent behind the original text in adopted code was to
ensure that the equipment in the room was protected from overheating. The base fire
code only addresses freezing. Unique to the Phoenix area, we must be aware of
electronic and equipment in non-cooled rooms/spaces. This code change requires
cooling be provided if the equipment in the room/space are listed for temperatures
under the anticipated maximum room temperature. In most situations, equipment with
electronics and microprocessors will require cooling for the room/space.

Results of Action for City and Community: This action benefits the customer as
currently all rooms/spaces must have cooling. This change allows the cooling to be
omitted if the equipment in the room is listed for the extreme Phoenix summer heat.

44. 901.6 901.6 Inspection, testing and maintenance. Fire detection
and alarm systems, emergency alarm systems, gas detection
systems, fire-extinguishing systems, smoke control systems,
mechanical smoke exhaust systems and smoke and heat vents
shall be maintained in an operative condition at all times, and
shall be replaced or repaired where defective. Appendix I is adopted
as part of the Phoenix Fire Code. This appendix is not intended
to provide comprehensive inspection, testing and maintenance
requirements, which are found in NFPA 10, 25 and 72. Rather, it
is intended to identify problems that are readily observable
during fire inspections. Nonrequired fire protection systems and
equipment shall be inspected, tested and maintained or removed.


Page 165
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

Action and Reason: This text addition to the code adopts Appendix I of the 2018
International Fire Code into the Phoenix Fire Code. This appendix expresses some of
the common observable violations that can impair a fire protection system from
operating correctly.

Results of Action for City and Community: This adoption will add a job aid to fire
inspection staff with additional detailed inspections points to observe while conducting
inspections. This appendix does not create any new code requirements or violations.
It only offers to identify common observable ones.

45. 901.7 Systems out of service. Where a required fire protection system is
out of service, the Phoenix Fire Department Alarm Room, 602-495-
5555 shall be notified immediately and, where required by the fire
code official, the building shall be either evacuated and/or an
approved fire watch shall be provided for all occupants left
unprotected by the shutdown until the fire protection system has
been returned to service. Failure to comply may result in the
revocation of qualified contractor status to be an accepted
Inspecting Authority within the City of Phoenix.

Where utilized, fire watches shall be provided with not less than one
approved means for notification of the fire department and their only
duty shall be to perform constant patrols of the protected premises
and keep watch for fires.


Action and Reason: Returns requirements to national standard language for
facilities that have approved mitigation procedures in place for impairments of life
safety systems.

Results of Action for City and Community: More flexibility is offered to the
community in addressing temporary and accidental impairments to life safety
systems.



Page 166
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

46. 907.5.2.2.5 Emergency Standby Power. Emergency voice/ alarm
communications systems shall be provided with emergency power in
accordance with Section 1203. The system shall be capable of
powering the required load for a duration of not less than 24
hours, as required in NFPA 72.

Action and Reason: This aligns the type of power source in accordance with current
national base IFC 2021

Results of Action for City and Community: Aligns requirement with national code.

47. Intentionally Left Blank




Action and Reason:

Results of Action for City and Community:

48. 914.3.1.2 Water supply to required fire pumps. In buildings that are more
than 420 feet (128 m) in building height, and buildings of Type IVA
and IVB construction that are more than 120 feet (36.6 m) in
building height, required fire pumps shall be supplied by
connections to not fewer than two water mains located in different
streets. Separate supply piping shall be provided between each
connection to the water main and the pumps. Each connection and
the supply piping between the connection and the pumps shall be
sized to supply the flow and pressure required for the pumps to
operate.




Page 167
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

Action and Reason: Adding in new language found in the 2021 International Fire
Code that ensures Heavy Wood Timber (IVB) constructed buildings of more than 120
feet tall are provided with secondary water supplies to avoid fire protection disruption.
This would help to ensure that a single water shut down would not shut down the
whole building’s fire protection systems.

Results of Action for City and Community: This will provide a higher level of
protection for occupants during disruptions to service, in heavy timber high rises along
with enhanced fire fighter safety and ability to mitigate a fire emergency.

49. 2007.6 Foam protection. Foam fire-protection capabilities
shall be provided for rooftop heliports. Such systems shall be
designed, installed and maintained in accordance with the
applicable provisions of Sections 903 through 905 and NFPA 11 &
418 409.

Action and Reason: This change in the NFPA numbers is to correct a clerical error
that resulted in the original code adoption referencing the incorrect NFPA standards
for foam systems.

Results of Action for City and Community: This action does not alter or change the
enforcement or requirements of the Phoenix Fire Code and only serves to eliminate
incorrect NFPA standard reference numbering.


50. 3103.3.2 3103.3.2 3108 Mazes. Mazes including, but not limited, to corn
3108 stalk or hedge mazes, shall be in accordance with this section and
Section 3106.

3103.3.2.1 3108.1 Safe refuge areas. Safe refuge areas shall be
established outside of the maze or building and structure,
and shall not be closer than 50 feet (15240 mm).

3103.3.2.2 3108.2 Paths. Paths throughout the maze shall be a

Page 168
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

minimum of 36 inches (914 mm) clear and unobstructed
width.

3103.3.2.3 3108.3 Separation. Not less than 20 feet (6096
mm) shall be provided between mazes and buildings and structures.
The 20-foot (6096 mm) clearance shall
be free from vegetation and obstructions.

3103.3.2.4 3108.4 Means of egress. Each exit shall be not less than
6 feet (1828 mm) wide.

3103.3.2.5 3108.5 Travel distance. The maximum travel distance to
reach an exit access shall not exceed 75 feet (22,860 mm). The travel
distance shall be determined by using the maze path.

3103.3.2.6 3108.6 Number. The travel distance required to
reach an exit access shall determine the number of exits required.
Locking devices shall remain unlocked on
exits when the maze is occupied.

3103.3.2.7 3108.7 Exit signs. Signs shall be provided next to
or above each exit. The lettering shall be not less than
12 inches (305 mm) high with 2-inch (51 mm) brushstrokes.
The signs shall read EXIT with lettering in a
color contrasting to the sign's background.

3103.3.2.8 3108.8 Security plan. The plan shall document who shall
provide security (e.g., off-duty police officers,
sheriff’s posse, employees). All security personnel
shall be provided with a 2-way radio and flashlight.

3103.3.2.9 3108.9 Evacuation plans. The plan shall document the
responsibilities of all on-site employees. The plan
shall also document how attendees will be evacuated and where they
will be evacuated.

Page 169
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed


3103.3.2.10 3108.10 Maze rules. Rules shall be posted at the
maze entrance.

3103.3.2.11 3108.11 Employee responsibilities. Each
employee shall be familiar with the evacuation plan and
with fire extinguisher locations. Documentation of
training shall be provided to the fire code official.

3103.3.2.12 3108.12 Employee guides. An employee shall be
responsible for guiding a group of not more than 14 attendees
through the maze. Each employee shall be provided with one
flashlight and a two-way radio. The employees shall be responsible
for detecting and reporting fire or smoke to a competent person
posted at the maze main entrance and begin evacuation procedures.

3103.3.2.13 3108.13 Main entrance employee. Each maze
shall be manned by an employee at the entrance. The
employee shall be capable of communicating with the
employees and shall be provided with a cellular telephone.
When the main entrance employee receives a
report of smoke, fire or injury, the employee shall
immediately call 911.

3103.3.2.14 3108.14 Watering. Corn stalk and hedge mazes
shall be provided with sufficient water and at a frequency that
prevents the vegetation from becoming dry or brittle. Failure to
comply with this provision creates an imminent hazard and the fire
code official shall issue a stop order.

3103.3.2.15 3108.15 Buildings and structures. Where buildings
and structures are intended to be occupied by
attendees, the building and structure shall comply with
Section 905 regarding Class III standpipes.


Page 170
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

Action and Reason: This section for “Mazes” was clerically placed in the wrong
location of the Chapter when printed. This corrected that clerical error.

Results of Action for City and Community: There is no permitting or regulatory
change as a result of this action.


51. 5003.2.2.1 2. Piping and tubing shall be identified in accordance with ASME
A13.1. Markings used for piping systems shall consist of the content’s
name and include a direction-of-flow arrow. Markings shall be
provided at each valve; at wall, floor or ceiling penetrations; at each
change of direction; and at a minimum of every 20 feet (6096 mm) or
fraction thereof throughout the piping run.

Action and Reason: This action changes a clerical error in the original code adoption
where ASME A13 was an incorrect statement. The correct ASME is 13.1

Results of Action for City and Community: This action does not alter or change the
enforcement or requirements of the Phoenix Fire Code and only serves to eliminate
incorrect ASME standard reference numbering.

52. 5005.1.12 Emergency isolation. Where gases or liquids having a hazard
ranking of Health Class 3 or 4, Flammability Class 4, Water Reactive
Reactivity Class 3 or 4 or Instability Class 3 or 4 in accordance with
NFPA 704 are carried in pressurized piping above 15 pounds per
square inch gauge (psig) (103 kPa), an approved means of leak
detection and emergency shutoff or excess flow control shall be
provided. Where the piping originates from within a hazardous
material storage room or area, the excess flow control shall be
located within the storage room or area. Where the piping originates
from a bulk source, the excess flow control shall be located as close
to the bulk source as practical.




Page 171
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

Action and Reason: Change the hazards classification description of “Reactivity” to
Water Reactive” as the original statement was a clerical error in the original adoption
of the fire code.

Results of Action for City and Community: This action does not alter or change the
enforcement or requirements of the Phoenix Fire Code and only serves to eliminate
incorrect hazards classification description.

53. Chapter 80 API

Std 2000 - 6th 7th Edition (2009 2014): Venting Atmosphere and Low-
pressure Storage Tanks: Nonrefrigerated and Refrigerated

RP 2028 – 3rd Edition (2002) Flame Arresters in Piping Systems

RP 2350 – 5th Edition (2021) Overfill Prevention for Storage
Tanks in Petroleum Facilities

ASHRAE The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and
Air-Conditioning Engineers

15 – 2016 2022 Safety Standard for Refrigeration Systems

ASME

A13.1 – 2015 2020

B31.3 – 2016 2020 Process Piping


BPVC - 2015 2019: ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code
(Sections I, II, IV, V & VI, VIII)




Page 172
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

ANSI/BHMA

A156.38 – 2009 Low Energy Power Operated Sliding and Folding
Doors

A156.27 – 2019 Power and Manual Operated Revolving
Pedestrian Doors

A156.19 – 2007 Power Assist and Low-Energy Power Operated
Doors

A156.10 – 2007 Power Operated Pedestrian Doors

OSHA

29 CFR 1910 & 1926

NFPA

855 – 20 23 Standard for the installation of energy storage
systems
1221 – 19 Standard for the Installation, Maintenance, and Use of
Emergency Services Communication Systems


Action and Reason: As material and manufacturing technology improve, adapt, and
change, the fire code needs to adapt at the same pace to meet the needs and
expectations of our development community. These changes update current adopted
national standards to newer editions and versions to ensure the Phoenix Fire Code
can provide safety while still promoting growth of new and emerging technologies and
code development.

Results of Action for City and Community: This action will bring the reference
standards more in line with current editions.


Page 173
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

54. 408 Emergency Response Preplanning. When required by the Fire
Code Official a facility, property, and/or business shall provide
the Fire Code Official with a site plan and building layout
(internal and external) identifying emergency access points, fire
control and protection equipment locations, and other life safety
features inside the property and structures.


• Action and Reason: This is a new requirement to the Phoenix Fire Code to
address identification of emergency equipment and locations both outside and
inside a building that are used during emergencies. When responding to
emergencies, time is a critical factor in the ability of first responders to facilitate
successful emergency operations and results. The ability to preplan and
understand a buildings’ critical life safety features are an integral part of this
component of response. Current Phoenix Fire Code (Sections 404 Emergency
Plans and 407 Hazard Communications) requires building operators and
owners to produce some information relating to their building designs, layouts,
and system locations/features based on occupancy type. However, the fire
code currently falls short in its ability to ensure first responders have critical
information relating to facilities. This missing information encompasses the
locations of fire department connections (FDC), fire sprinkler riser rooms,
standpipe locations, fire fighter breathing air locations, smoke control and
evacuation panel locations, blind elevator shafts, and similar system locations
and access points.

Results of Action for City and Community: This action will enhance fire fighter and
building occupant safety by allowing responding first responders to evaluate and
formulate plans while enroute and while operating on-scene.





Page 174
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

55. 1204.2.3 Building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) systems.
Where building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) systems are
installed in a manner that creates areas with electrical hazards to
be hidden from view, markings shall be provided to identify the
hazardous areas to avoid. The markings shall be reflective and
be visible from grade.

Exception: BIPV systems listed in accordance with Section
690.12(B)(2) of NFPA 70 (2020 edition), where the removal or
cutting away of portions of the BIPV system during fire-fighting
operations have been determined to not expose a fire fighter to
electrical shock hazards.


Action and Reason: This requirement reflects new language in the International Fire
Code of which our Phoenix Fire Code is derived from. This new section requires
markings and signage to address concerns for fire fighter safety when cutting holes or
exposing wires in a building during fire ground operations that may still be energized
from a photovoltaic (solar) system.

Results of Action for City and Community: This action will enhance fire fighter and
building occupant safety.

56. 1206.2.2 Construction documents. The following information
shall be provided with the permit application:
1. Location and layout diagram of the room in which the
stationary storage battery system is to be installed.
2. Details on hourly fire-resistance-rated assemblies
provided.
3. Quantities and types of storage batteries and battery
systems.
4. Manufacturer’s specifications, ratings and listings of
storage batteries and battery systems.
5. Details on energy management systems.


Page 175
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

6. Location and content of signage.
7. Details on fire-extinguishing, smoke detection and
ventilation systems.
8. Rack storage arrangement, including seismic support
criteria.
9. A commissioning plan Section TBD
10. A decommissioning plan Section TBD
Action and Reason: This requirement reflects new language in the International
Fire Code of which our Phoenix Fire Code is derived from. This code section
requires a commission and decommission plan be created for ESS installations.
This will help ensure that safe and code compliant procedures are adhered to
when the systems are brought online and when they meet their end of life.

Results of Action for City and Community: This action help provide a plan for
the safe operation and decommissioning of ESS installations over their life span.

57. 1206.1 Scope. The provisions in this section are applicable to
energy storage systems designed to provide electrical power to
a building or facility. These systems are used to provide standby
or emergency power, an uninterruptable power supply, load
shedding, load sharing or similar capabilities. Energy storage
systems in Group R-3 and R-4 occupancies shall be in
accordance with Sections 1206.2.1 and 1206.4. Approved
signage is required for all installations.

General. The provisions in this section are applicable to
stationary and mobile Energy Storage System (ESS).

Exception: ESS in Group R-3 and R-4 occupancies exceeding
those amounts listed in table 1206.2 shall comply with Section
1206.4 and 1206.2.1.1

Action and Reason: These changes to the current code text serve only to better
articulate the size of an energy storage system that would be regulated and permitted
by this section.

Page 176
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed


Results of Action for City and Community: There is no change in the regulation
amounts or permitting as a result of this action.

58. 1206.2.1 Permits. Permits shall be obtained for the construction and
operation of stationary storage battery systems with a capacity
of more than 3 kWh, in accordance with Section 105.7.2.

Scope. ESS having capacities exceeding the values shown in
Table 1206.2 shall comply with this section.

Exception: ESS in Group R-3 and R-4 occupancies exceeding
those amounts listed in table 1206.2 shall comply with Section
1206.4

Action and Reason: These changes to the current code text serve only to better
articulate the size of an energy storage system that would be regulated and permitted
by this section.

Results of Action for City and Community: There is no change in the regulation
amounts or permitting as a result of this action.

59. 1206.2.1.1 Stationary storage battery systems. Stationary storage
battery systems having capacities exceeding the values
shown in Table 1206.2 shall comply with Section 1206.2.1
through 1206.2.13.6, as applicable. Approved signage is
required for all installations.

Permits. Permits shall be obtained for ESS as follows;

1. Construction permits shall be obtained for stationary ESS
installations greater than table 1206.2 and for mobile ESS
charging and storage locations covered by Section
1207.10.1.


Page 177
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed


2. Permits shall be obtained in accordance with Section
105.7.2




Action and Reason: These changes to the current code text serve only to better
articulate the size of an energy storage system that would be regulated and permitted
by this section.

Results of Action for City and Community: There is no change in the regulation
amounts or permitting as a result of this action.

60. 1206.2.1 Permits. Permits shall be obtained for the construction
of stationary storage battery systems with a
capacity of more than 3 kWh, in accordance with Section
105.7.2.



Action and Reason: These changes to the current code text serve only to better
articulate the size of an energy storage system that would be regulated and permitted
by this section.

Results of Action for City and Community: There is no change in the regulation
amounts or permitting as a result of this action.

61. Table 1206.2 BATTERY TECHNOLOGY ENERGY CAPACITY a
Flow batteries 20 kWh
Lead-acid batteries, all types 70 kWh
Lithium, all types 20 kWh
Nickel-cadmium batteries (Ni-
70 kWh
Cd)
Other battery technologies 10 kWh

Page 178
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

Stationary ESS in R3/4
3 kWh
Occupancies
Other electrochemical ESS 3 kWh




Action and Reason: There are two actions with this table change. Firstly, the
“Stationary battery technologies at R-3 & R-4 occupancies” change to the current
table serves only to better articulate the size of an energy storage system that would
be regulated and permitted by this section. Secondly, the “Other electrochemical
ESS” is not currently in the Phoenix Fire Code but is found in the 2021 International
Fire Code. As technology and manufacturing material improve, adapt, and change,
the fire code needs to adapt at the same pace to meet the needs and expectations of
our development community.

Results of Action for City and Community: This will set forth the regulation of new
ESS (battery) technology and chemistry types not yet developed or envisioned when
the current Phoenix Fire Code was adopted.

62. 1207 PORTABLE GENERATORS

1207.1 Portable generators. The use, operation and maintenance
of portable generators shall comply with this section.

1207.2 Listing. Portable generators manufactured after January
1, 2021, shall be listed and labeled in accordance with UL 2201.

1207.3 Operation and maintenance. Portable generators shall be
operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s
instructions.

1207.4 Grounding. Portable generators shall be grounded in
accordance with NFPA 70.


Page 179
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

1207.5 Operating locations. Portable generators shall be
operated only outdoors a minimum of 5 feet (1524 mm) from any
building openings such as windows and doors or air intakes.
Portable generators shall not be operated within buildings or
enclosed areas. Additional separation shall be provided for
tents, membrane structures and outdoor assembly events as
specified in Chapter 31.

1207.6 Cords and wiring. Extension cords and temporary wiring
used to connect portable generators shall be in accordance with
Section 604 and shall be provided with GFCI protection.

1207.7 Connections to premise wiring. Connections to a premise
wiring system shall comply with all of the following:

1. Power shall not be provided in a manner that “backfeeds”
receptacles or the premise wiring system.
2. Connection to a premise served by commercial power shall
be made
through a listed transfer switch installed, used and
maintained in accordance with NFPA 70.
3. Connection to buildings not served by commercial power
shall comply with NFPA 70.

1207.8 Refueling. Portable generators shall not be refueled while
operating.

1207.9 Storage and repair. Storage and repair of fuel-fired
portable generators shall comply with Section 313.

1207.10 Fire extinguisher. A listed portable fire extinguisher
complying with Section 906 with a minimum rating of 2-A:20-
B:C shall be provided not more than 50 feet (15 240 mm) from
the portable generator.


Page 180
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed




Action and Reason: This requirement reflects new language in the 2021
International Fire Code of which our Phoenix Fire Code is derived from.

Results of Action for City and Community: These new sections address the
hazards associated with portable generators and work to reduce and hopefully
eliminate any possible hazards situation with their use.

63. Final 1203.2.5 (Final Numbering TBD) Exhaust ventilation. Standby
Numbering power shall be provided for mechanical exhaust ventilation
TBD systems as required in Section 1207.6.1.2.1 (Final Numbering
TBD). The system shall be capable of powering the required load
for a duration of not less than 2 hours.

1203.4.1 Group I-2 and ambulatory care facilities. In Group I-2
occupancies and ambulatory care facilities, emergency and
standby power systems shall be maintained in accordance with NFPA
99.

1203.5.1 Group I-2 and ambulatory care facilities. In Group I-2
occupancies and ambulatory care facilities, emergency and
standby power systems shall be inspected and tested under load in
accordance with NFPA 99.



Action and Reason: These proposed code sections reflects new language found
in the 2021 International Fire Code


Page 181
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

Results of Action for City and Community: These changes reflect emergency
and standby power requirements. This adoption of current 2021 International Fire
Code base language supports our mission of community risk reduction.

64. Final 1207.3.8 (Final Numbering TBD) Replacements. Replacements
Numbering of ESS shall be considered new ESS installations and shall
TBD comply with the provisions of Section 1207 (Final Numbering
TBD) as applicable to new ESS. The ESS being replaced shall be
decommissioned in accordance with Section 1207.2.3 (Final
Numbering TBD).

1207.3.9 (Final Numbering TBD) Reused and repurposed
equipment. Equipment and materials shall only be reused or
reinstalled as permitted in Section 104.8.1. (Final Numbering
TBD) Storage batteries previously used in other applications,
such as electric vehicle propulsion, shall not be reused in
applications regulated by Chapter 12 unless approved by the fire
code official and unless the equipment is refurbished by a
battery refurbishing company approved in accordance with UL
1974.

1207.1.6.1 (Final Numbering TBD) Fire mitigation personnel.
Where, in the opinion of the fire code official, it is essential for
public safety that trained personnel be on-site to respond to
possible ignition or re-ignition of a damaged ESS, the system
owner, agent or lessee shall immediately dispatch one or more
fire mitigation personnel to the premise, as required
and approved, at their expense. These personnel shall remain on
duty continuously after the fire department leaves the premise
until the damaged energy storage equipment is removed from
the premises, or earlier if the fire code official indicates the
public safety hazard has been abated.

1207.1.6.2 (Final Numbering TBD) Duties. On-duty fire mitigation
personnel shall have the following responsibilities:

Page 182
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

1. Keep a diligent watch for fires, obstructions to means of
egress and other hazards.
2. Immediately contact the fire department if their assistance is
needed to mitigate any hazards or extinguish fires.
3. Take prompt measures for remediation of hazards in
accordance with the decommissioning plan per Section 1207.2.3
(Final Numbering TBD).
4. Take prompt measures to assist in the evacuation of the
public from the structures.

1206.2.7 (Final Numbering TBD) Testing, maintenance and repair
and retrofitting. Storage batteries and associated equipment and
systems shall be tested and maintained in accordance with the
manufacturer’s instructions. Any storage batteries or system
components used to replace existing units shall be compatible
with the battery charger, energy management systems, other
storage batteries and other safety systems. Introducing other
types of storage batteries into the stationary storage battery
system or other types of electrolytes into flow battery systems
shall be treated as a new installation and require approval by the
fire code official before the replacements are introduced into
service.

1207.3.6 (Final Numbering TBD) Repairs. Repairs of ESS shall
only be done by qualified personnel. Repairs with other than
identical parts shall be considered retrofitting and comply
with Section 1207.3.7 (Final Numbering TBD). Repairs shall be
documented in the service records log.

1207.3.7 (Final Numbering TBD) Retrofits. Retrofitting of an
existing ESS shall comply with the following:
1. A construction permit shall be obtained in accordance
with Section 105.6.5 (Final Numbering TBD).
2. New batteries, battery modules, capacitors and similar ESS
components shall be listed.

Page 183
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

3. Battery management and other monitoring systems shall be
connected and installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s
instructions.
4. The overall installation shall continue to comply with UL
9540 listing requirements, where applicable.
5. Systems that have been retrofitted shall be commissioned in
accordance with Section 1207.2.1 (Final Numbering TBD).
6. Retrofits shall be documented in the service records log.

1207.3.7.1 (Final Numbering TBD) Retrofitting lead acid and
nickel cadmium. Section 1207.3.7 (Final Numbering TBD) shall
not apply to retrofitting of lead-acid and nickel-cadmium
batteries with other lead-acid and nickel-cadmium batteries at
facilities under the exclusive control of communications utilities
that comply with NFPA 76 and operate at less than 50 VAC and
60 VDC.

1206.2.10.1 Listings. Storage batteries and battery storage
systems shall comply with the following:
1. Storage batteries shall be listed in accordance
with UL 1973.
2. Prepackaged and pre-engineered stationary storage
battery systems shall be listed in accordance with UL 9540.
Exception: Lead-acid batteries are not required to
be listed.

1206.2.10.1 (Final Numbering TBD) Energy storage system
listings. ESS shall be listed in accordance with UL 9540.
Exception: Lead-acid and nickel-cadmium battery systems
installed in facilities under the exclusive control of
communications utilities, and operating at less than 50 VAC and
60 VDC in accordance with NFPA 76, are not required to
be listed.



Page 184
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

1207.3.2 (Final Numbering TBD) Equipment listing. Chargers,
inverters and energy storage management systems shall be
covered as part of the UL 9540 listing or shall
be listed separately.

1207.3.3 (Final Numbering TBD) Utility interactive systems.
Inverters shall be listed and labeled in accordance with UL 1741.
Only inverters listed and labeled for utility interactive system
use and identified as interactive shall be allowed to operate in
parallel with the electric utility power system to supply power to
common loads.

1207.5.4.1 (Final Numbering TBD) System status. Where
required by the fire code official, visible annunciation shall be
provided on cabinet exteriors or in other approved locations to
indicate that potentially hazardous conditions associated with
the ESS exist.

1206.2.11.2 Smoke detection system. An approved automatic
smoke detection system shall be installed in
rooms containing stationary storage battery systems in
accordance with Section 907.2.

1207.5.4 (Final Numbering TBD) Fire detection.
An approved automatic smoke detection system or radiant
energy-sensing fire detection system complying with Section
907.2 shall be installed in rooms, indoor areas and walk-in units
containing electrochemical ESS. An approved radiant energy-
sensing fire detection system shall be installed to protect open
parking garage and rooftop installations. Alarm signals from
detection systems shall be transmitted to a central station,
proprietary or remote station service in accordance with NFPA
72, or where approved to a constantly attended location.



Page 185
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

1207.5.4.1 (Final Numbering TBD) System status. Where
required by the fire code official, visible annunciation shall be
provided on cabinet exteriors or in other approved locations to
indicate that potentially hazardous conditions associated with
the ESS exist.

1207.2 (Final Numbering TBD) Commissioning,
decommissioning, operation and maintenance. Commissioning,
decommissioning, operation and maintenance shall be
conducted in accordance with this section.

1207.2.1 (Final Numbering TBD) Commissioning.
Commissioning of newly installed ESS and existing ESS that
have been retrofitted, replaced or previously decommissioned
and are returning to service shall be conducted prior to the ESS
being placed in service in accordance with a commissioning
plan that has been approved prior to initiating commissioning.
The commissioning plan shall include the following:
1. A narrative description of the activities that will be
accomplished during each phase of commissioning, including
the personnel intended to accomplish each of the activities.
2. A listing of the specific ESS and associated components,
controls and safety-related devices to be tested, a description of
the tests to be performed and the functions to be
tested. 3.
Conditions under which all testing will be performed, which are
representative of the conditions during normal operation of the
system.
4. Documentation of the owner’s project requirements and the
basis of design necessary to understand the installation and
operation of the ESS.
5. Verification that required equipment and systems are installed
in accordance with the approved plans and specifications.
6. Integrated testing for all fire and safety systems.


Page 186
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

7. Testing for any required thermal management, ventilation or
exhaust systems associated with the ESS installation.
8. Preparation and delivery of operation and maintenance
documentation.
9. Training of facility operating and maintenance staff.
10. Identification and documentation of the requirements for
maintaining system performance to meet the original design
intent during the operation phase.
11. Identification and documentation of personnel who are
qualified to service, maintain and decommission the ESS, and
respond to incidents involving the ESS, including
documentation that such service has been contracted for.
12. A decommissioning plan for removing the ESS from service,
and from the facility in which it is located. The plan shall include
details on providing a safe, orderly shutdown of energy storage
and safety systems with notification to the code officials prior to
the actual decommissioning of the system. The
decommissioning plan shall include contingencies for removing
an intact operational ESS from service, and for removing an ESS
from service that has been damaged by a fire or other event.

Exception: Commissioning shall not be required for lead-acid
and nickel-cadmium battery systems at facilities under the
exclusive control of communications utilities that comply
with NFPA 76 and operate at less than 50 VAC and 60 VDC. A
decommissioning plan shall be provided and maintained where
required by the fire code official.

1207.2.1.1 (Final Numbering TBD) Initial acceptance testing.
During the commissioning process an ESS shall be evaluated
for proper operation in accordance with the manufacturer’s
instructions and the commissioning plan prior to final approval.

1207.2.1.2 (Final Numbering TBD) Commissioning report. A
report describing the results of the system commissioning,

Page 187
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

including the results of the initial acceptance testing required
in Section 1207.2.1.1 (Final Numbering TBD), shall be provided
to the fire code official prior to final inspection and approval and
maintained at an approved on-site location.

1207.2.2 (Final Numbering TBD) Operation and maintenance. An
operation and maintenance manual shall be provided to both the
ESS owner or their authorized agent and the ESS operator
before the ESS is put into operation and shall include the
following:
1. Manufacturer’s operation manuals and maintenance manuals
for the entire ESS, or for each component of the system
requiring maintenance, that clearly identify the required routine
maintenance actions.
2. Name, address and phone number of a service agency that
has been contracted to service the ESS and its associated safety
systems.
3. Maintenance and calibration information, including wiring
diagrams, control drawings, schematics, system programming
instructions and control sequence descriptions, for all energy
storage control systems.
4. Desired or field-determined control set points that are
permanently recorded on control drawings at control devices or,
for digital control systems, in system programming instructions.
5. A schedule for inspecting and recalibrating all ESS controls.
6. A service record log form that lists the schedule for all
required servicing and maintenance actions and space for
logging such actions that are completed over time and retained
on-site.

The ESS shall be operated and maintained in accordance with
the manual and a copy of the manual shall be retained at an
approved on-site location.



Page 188
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

1207.2.2.1 (Final Numbering TBD) Ongoing inspection and
testing. Systems that monitor and protect the ESS installation
shall be inspected and tested in accordance with the
manufacturer’s instructions and the operation and maintenance
manual. Inspection and testing records shall be maintained in
the operation and maintenance manual.

1207.2.3 (Final Numbering TBD) Decommissioning. The code
official shall be notified prior to the decommissioning of an ESS.
Decommissioning shall be performed in accordance with the
decommissioning plan that includes the following:
1. A narrative description of the activities to be accomplished for
removing the ESS from service, and from the facility in which it
is located.
2. A listing of any contingencies for removing an intact
operational ESS from service, and for removing an ESS from
service that has been damaged by a fire or other event.


Action and Reason: These proposed code sections reflects new language found
in the 2021 International Fire Code

Results of Action for City and Community: These changes are a reflection of
current 2021 International Fire Code base language that supports our mission of
community risk reduction as it relates to ESS.

65. 1207.10 (Final Numbering TBD) Mobile ESS equipment and
operations. Mobile ESS equipment and operations shall comply
with Sections 1207.10.1 (Final Numbering
TBD) through 1207.10.7.7 (Final Numbering TBD).





Page 189
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed




1207.10.1 (Final Numbering TBD) Charging and storage. For the
purpose of Section 1207.10 (Final Numbering TBD), charging
and storage covers the operation where mobile ESS are charged
and stored so they are ready for deployment to another site, and
where they are charged and stored after a deployment.

1207.10.2 (Final Numbering TBD) Deployment. For the purpose
of Section 1207.10, deployment covers operations where mobile
ESS are located at a site other than the charging and storage
site and are being used to provide power.

1207.10.3 (Final Numbering TBD) Permits. Construction permits
shall be provided for charging and storage of mobile ESS shall
be provided for deployment of mobile ESS as required
by Section 1207.1.2 (Final Numbering TBD).

1207.10.4 (Final Numbering TBD) Construction documents.
Construction documents complying with Section 1207.1.3 (Final
Numbering TBD) shall be provided with the construction permit
application for mobile ESS charging and storage locations.

1207.10.4.1 (Final Numbering TBD) Deployment documents. The
following information shall be provided with the operation permit
applications for mobile ESS deployments:


Page 190
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

1. Relevant information for the mobile ESS equipment and
protection measures in the construction documents required
by Section 1207.1.3 (Final Numbering TBD).
2. Location and layout diagram of the area in which the mobile
ESS is to be deployed, including a scale diagram of all nearby
exposures.
3. Location and content of signage, including no smoking signs.
4. Description of fencing to be provided around the ESS,
including locking methods.
5. Details on fire suppression, smoke and automatic fire
detection, system monitoring, thermal management, exhaust
ventilation and explosion control, if provided.
6. For deployment, the intended duration of operation, including
anticipated connection and disconnection times and dates.
7. Location and description of local staging stops during transit
to the deployment site. See Section 1207.10.7.5 (Final Numbering
TBD).
8. Description of the temporary wiring, including connection
methods, conductor type and size, and circuit overcurrent
protection to be provided.
9. Description of how fire suppression system connections to
water supplies or extinguishing agents are to be provided.
10. Contact information for personnel who are responsible for
maintaining and servicing the equipment, and responding to
emergencies as required by Section 1207.1.6.1 (Final Numbering
TBD).

1207.10.5 (Final Numbering TBD) Approved locations. Locations
where mobile ESS are charged, stored and deployed shall be
restricted to the locations established on the construction
permit.

1207.10.6 (Final Numbering TBD) Charging and storage.
Installations where mobile ESS are charged and stored shall be
treated as permanent ESS indoor or outdoor installations, and

Page 191
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

shall comply with the following sections, as applicable:
1. Indoor charging and storage shall comply with Section 1207.7.
2. Outdoor charging and storage shall comply with Section
1207.8. 3.
Charging and storage on rooftops and in open parking garages
shall comply with Section 1207.9 (Final Numbering TBD).

Exceptions: 1.
Electrical connections shall be permitted to be made using
temporary wiring complying with the manufacturer’s
instructions, the UL 9540 listing and NFPA 70.
2. Fire suppression system connections to the water supply
shall be permitted to use approved temporary connections.

1207.10.7 (Final Numbering TBD) Deployed mobile ESS
requirements. Deployed mobile ESS equipment and operations
shall comply with this section and Table 1207.10 (Final
Numbering TBD).

1207.10.7.1 (Final Numbering TBD) Duration. The duration of
mobile ESS deployment shall not exceed 30 days.
Exceptions:
1. Mobile ESS deployments that provide power for durations
longer than 30 days shall comply with Section 1207.10.6 (Final
Numbering TBD).
2. Mobile ESS deployments shall not exceed 180 days unless
additional approval from the Fire Code Official is obtained.

1207.10.7.2 (Final Numbering TBD) Restricted locations.
Deployed mobile ESS operations shall not be located indoors, in
covered parking garages, on rooftops, below grade or under
building overhangs.

1207.10.7.3 (Final Numbering TBD) Clearance to exposures.
Deployed mobile ESS shall be separated by a minimum of 10

Page 192
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

feet (3048 mm) from the following exposures:
1. Public ways.
2. Buildings.
3. Stored combustible materials.
4. Hazardous materials.
5. High-piled storage.
6. Other exposure hazards.
Deployed mobile ESS shall be separated by a minimum of 50
feet (15,240 mm) from public seating areas and from tents,
canopies and membrane structures with an occupant load of 30
or more.

1207.10.7.4 (Final Numbering TBD) Electrical connections.
Electrical connections shall be made in accordance with the
manufacturer’s instructions and the UL 9540 listing. Temporary
wiring for electrical power connections shall comply with NFPA
70. Fixed electrical wiring shall not be provided.

1207.10.7.5 (Final Numbering TBD) Local staging. Mobile ESS in
transit from the charging and storage location to the deployment
location and back shall not be parked within 100 feet (30,480
mm) of an occupied building for more than 1 hour during transit,
unless specifically approved by the fire code official when the
permit is issued.

1207.10.7.6 (Final Numbering TBD) Fencing. An approved fence
with a locked gate or other approved barrier shall be provided to
keep the general public at least 5 feet (1,524 mm) from the outer
enclosure of a deployed mobile ESS.

1207.10.7.7 (Final Numbering TBD) Smoking. Smoking shall be
prohibited within 10 feet (3,048 mm) of mobile ESS. Signs shall
be posted in accordance with Section 310.



Page 193
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

Action and Reason: These proposed code sections reflects new language found
in the 2021 International Fire Code

Results of Action for City and Community: These changes are a reflection of
mobile ESS system language in the current 2021 International Fire Code base
that supports our mission of community risk reduction.

66. Appendix D Remove Appendix D’s contents (Fire Department Details) from
the adopted Fire Code and create a standalone “Phoenix Fire
Department Access and Identification Detail Manual.” Appendix
D will now refer to this document for access details.



Action and Reason: Chapter 5 of the Phoenix Fire Code drives the requirements
for when emergency access is required. Appended D only serves to clarify the
way in which the access is to me signed or marked. Example a fire lane sign color,
size, lettering, font, and location. As access technology and emergency apparatus
evolve, so must the emergency access and signage detail requirements of the fire
code. This change allows Fire Prevention to adjust material and specs for access
identification as industry evolves rather than awaiting a code change cycle.

Results of Action for City and Community: Fire Prevention can approve and
allow new technology and materials with a reduced approval time frame for our
customers.

67. 105.6.36 Outdoor assembly event. An operational permit is required to
conduct an outdoor assembly event where planned attendance
exceeds 500 persons, or where 50 or more persons are in a confined
area.by temporary fencing or barriers.


Action and Reason: With the original text, any event with 50 or more people on
an already permitted patio or similar enclosed area would require an assembly
permit. This was not the intent to require outdoor assembly permits for areas


Page 194
Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix Amendment, Clarification, & Consistency Change
Tracker
Changes to the Current 2018 Fire Prevention Code of the City of Phoenix
Black Text = Current adopted text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed text to be removed

already approved for that use. This new language now adds those confined by
temporary fencing or barriers to apply to special temporary events only.

Results of Action for City and Community: This will reduce the confusion of
the requirements and clarify the intent for temporary special events.





Page 195
Sec�on 3
Fire Preven�on Fee Schedule Amendment
Detailed Change Log




Page 196
Fire Prevention Fee Schedule Amendments, Consistency, & Clarification Change Tracker


Changes after Adoption 2018 Fire Prevention Fee Schedule Amendment Log
Black Text = Current adopted Fee Schedule text
Blue Bold Text = Proposed amended text to be added
Blue Bold Strikethrough Text = Proposed amended text to be removed

Action Taken By:
Fire Safety Advisory Board Date 9/25/2023
Approved as Submitted Modified and Approved Denied No Action Taken
Public Safety & Justice Subcommittee Date 1/3/2024
Approved as Submitted Modified and Approved Denied No Action Taken

Approved as Submitted Modified and Approved Denied No Action Taken
1. Fee Group 5 A Group 5 facility is any: Business, factory, institutional, storage or
Stationary hazardous occupancy that also has storage of hazardous materials
Aboveground in stationary above-ground storage tanks, stationary cryogenic
Storage Tank tanks or stationary pressure vessels having a capacity of greater
Assessment than 60 gallons (227 L), or compressed gas cylinder or dewars
greater than 40 gallons (151 L).

Reason: This action removes the $525 annual assessment fee for properties that use
Dewars between 40 – 60 gallons. These are commonly found as carbon dioxide (CO2)
vessels used at food establishments and convenience stores for beverage systems.
These CO2 systems and Dewars already have a recurring operational permit fees
established.
Results of Action for City and Community: This action removes the unintentional
double assessment/fee for these Dewars at businesses. Currently through procedures and
SOPs Fire Prevention has not been charging this assessment fee so no cost or fee
impacts are anticipated to be experienced by the City or customer.

2. Solar Photovoltaic To install or modify a residential solar photovoltaic power
Power System and system with an alternating current nameplate rating of 3 kW
Electrical Energy - 15 kW alternating current nameplate rating and battery
Storage Systems energy storage system with 3 kWh - 27 kWh capacity.
Combo
OTC $150 per hour / Minimum $300 (2 hour)

Reason: To streamline processes and reduce costs for the solar and energy storage
development community and end users, a combination permit has been introduced. This


Page 197
Fire Prevention Fee Schedule Amendments, Consistency, & Clarification Change Tracker
permit consolidates the over-the-counter permits for solar and battery installations at
single-family residential locations when submitted together, resulting in reduced staff
processing time and customer fees. Previously, separate permits incurred fees of 4 hours
($600), whereas the new combo permit costs 2 hours ($300) in total. This action also
brings the permit fee in line with current staff time expenditures facilitating permitting and
inspections for these types of installation. These permits account for only 3% of all energy
system permits and will have a negligible effect on revenue. Based FY 22-23 data, this
change would result in approximately $63,000 in reduced revenue for a program that
generates $1.9 million in total revenue.

Results of Action for City and Community: Reduction in City staff resources required
in processing applications and permits along with streamlining customer application and
inspection process.

3. Table Area Building Site area (ft2)
Assessment Fees
Table

Reason: This fee is based on total “site area” per code and not “building” site area. This
was a clerical error in the original fee schedule that added the word building.

Results of Action for City and Community: No cost or fee impacts anticipated as this
error has been temporarily addressed in Fire Prevention procedures and will now be
corrected in code.

4. After Hours After-hours inspections shall be billed a minimum 3 hrs at the
Inspections hourly rate. Additional time needed to complete the inspection will
be billed at the hourly rate. Special Event permits (Pyrotechnic,
bonfire, indoor/outdoor assembly, fire performer, vehicle
display inside an assembly, amusement building, trade
show, and tent) include 3 hours overtime in the permit fee.
Additional time required will be billed at the established rate.

Reason: Unlike other permit fees, special event permit fees currently have the base
overtime rate compensation built into their permit fee. It was not intended to charge special
event permits additional fees for overtime that do not exceed the 3 hours built into the
permit.

Results of Action for City and Community: Action will ensure customers are not doubled
billed for overtime inspection activity. No cost or fee impacts anticipated as this error has
been temporarily addressed in Fire Prevention procedures and will now be corrected in
code.




Page 198
Fire Prevention Fee Schedule Amendments, Consistency, & Clarification Change Tracker
5. Semiconductor To operate a semiconductor facility that is not part of an HPM
facility. facility

Reason: Current Phoenix Fire Code has a requirement for an operational permit for HPM
facilities and semiconductor facilities. This results in code as currently adopted, having two
permits for the same operation type.

Results of Action for City and Community: Action removes the unintentional possible
double permitting and billing for these types of semiconductor facilities.

6. Solar Photovoltaic To install or modify a residential solar photovoltaic power
Power System and system with an alternating current nameplate rating of
Electrical Energy greater than 15 kW alternating current nameplate rating and
Storage Systems battery energy storage system with a greater than 27 kWh
Combo capacity.

Plan review Fee = $150 per hour / Minimum $300 (2 hour)
Inspection Fee = $150 per hour / Minimum $150 (1 hour)

To streamline processes and reduce costs for the solar and energy storage development
community and end users, a combination permit has been introduced. This permit
consolidates the over-the-counter permits for solar and battery installations at single-
family residential locations when submitted together, resulting in reduced staff processing
time and customer fees. Previously, separate permits incurred fees of 4 hours ($600),
whereas the new combo permit costs 2.5 hours ($450) in total. This action also brings the
permit fee in line with current staff time expenditures facilitating permitting and inspections
for these types of installation. These permits account for only 1.2% of all energy system
permits and will have a negligible effect on revenue. Based FY 22-23 data, this change
would result in approximately $13,200 in reduced revenue for a program that generates
$1.9 million in total revenue.

Results of Action for City and Community: Reduction in City staff resources required in
processing applications, permits, and plan reviews along with streamlining customer
application and inspection process.

7. Flammable/Combus To change out a F/C dispenser at a motor vehicle fueling site.
tible Dispenser Does not include any work below sheer valve (process
Changeout or Tank piping/sumps/etc.) or emergency shutoff switch relocation. All
Reline OTC work that is below sheer valve and/or affects piping will require
plan review.

$150 per hour / Minimum $300 (2 hour)



Page 199
Fire Prevention Fee Schedule Amendments, Consistency, & Clarification Change Tracker
Reason: This action creates an over the counter (OTC) construction permit to replace
the current operational permit required. This action is a construction activity and
inadvertently was originally made an operational permit type.
Results of Action for City and Community: This will help expedite fueling sites when
they are required to change out a dispenser by reducing permitting time frames. This
permit is existing but will now become an over the counter not requiring plans to be
submitted as a condition of permit issuance. No cost or fee impacts anticipated.






Page 200



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Aircraft Rescue Firefighter Training (Ordinance S-50710)

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement with the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board
(DFW) for Aircraft Rescue Firefighter Training for the Fire Department. Further request
authorization for the City Controller to disburse funds required for this item.

Summary
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (Sky Harbor) has Aircraft Rescue Firefighting
(ARFF) capability. In order to maintain this capability, City of Phoenix Fire Department
(PFD) firefighters stationed at Sky Harbor must train in accordance with Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) standards. These standards mandate that PFD
firefighters train with live burn exercises each year, and every third year the training
must be held at a facility with multiple, simultaneously burning full-scale aircraft. DFW
meets or exceeds the Index D training facility requirements by the FAA.

There are very few large-scale training sites located across the United States that
meet the Index D training facility requirements set by the FAA. ARFF requires a site
with ample flight availability and proximity to allow an approximate 24-hour turnaround
training for students. DFW is a large-scale training facility and meets the flight and
proximity requirements.

DFW has taken exception to the indemnification and liability provisions in the contract.
PFD is seeking an exception to Phoenix Code section 42-18 in allowing for
indemnification against any liability, claim, loss, damage or expenses, including without
limitation, reasonable attorney fees, arising from its negligent acts or omissions in
connection with its performance of the agreement, or its failure to comply with the
terms of the agreement, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction. PFD is
also seeking an exception to Phoenix Code section 42-18 in allowing a limitation of
damages not to exceed $5,000,000.

Contract Term
The contract term shall begin on or about April 1, 2024 for a three-year term with no
options to extend.



Page 201

Financial Impact
Maximum total three-year contract value could be up to $415,000. The funds are
available in the Aviation Department's budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.




Page 202



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Fire Hose and Ladder Testing Contract - COOP 24-0083 Request for Award
(Ordinance S-50729)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a cooperative
agreement with Fire Catt, LLC to provide Fire Hose and Ladder Testing for the Fire
Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $250,000.

Summary
This contract will provide Fire Hose and Ladder Testing for the Fire Department. The
Fire Department maintains a large fleet of specialized vehicles equipped with
numerous ladders and approximately 200,000 linear feat of fire hose. Per the National
Fire Protection Association Standards, NFPA 1962 and NFPA 1932, testing and
inspections of fire hose and ladders must be performed annually by trained personnel.
All testing and inspections shall be in accordance with applicable state and local fire
codes, as well as the NFPA. Without proper testing and inspections, the Fire
Department would experience equipment failures and be subject to potential property
loss and jeopardize firefighter and public safety.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, a participating agreement is
required when the City uses a cooperative agreement from another public agency. The
contract was awarded through a competitive process consistent with the City's
procurement process, as set forth in the Phoenix City Code, Chapter 43. Cooperative
agreements allow the City to benefit from government pricing and volume discounts.
Fire Catt, LLC, uses patented technology to provide precision service testing allowing
the Fire Department to maintain it's hoses and ladders at levels required by NFPA
standards.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about April 3, 2024, for a five-year term with no options to
extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value for will not exceed $250,000 for the five-year aggregate


Page 203

term. Funding is available in the Fire Department's budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.




Page 204



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Request to Apply for and Accept Federal Fiscal Year 2023 Assistance to
Firefighters Grant Program Funds (Ordinance S-50748)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to retroactively apply for, and
accept, if awarded, up to $311,553 from Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2023 Assistance to
Firefighters Grant (AFG) Program to fund wearable biometric devices for firefighter
safety and accountability. Further request authorization for the City Treasurer to
accept, and for the City Controller to disburse, all funds related to this item. If not
approved, the grant, if awarded, would be turned down.

Summary
The AFG Program, administered through the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA), is intended to help the nation's fire service by providing vital funds to local fire
departments across the country. The primary goal of the program is to meet the
firefighting and emergency response needs of fire departments, nonaffiliated
emergency medical service organizations, and State Fire Training Academies. Since
2001, AFG has helped firefighters and other first responders obtain critically needed
equipment, protective gear, emergency vehicles, training, and other resources
necessary to protect the public and emergency personnel from fire and related
hazards.

Wearable Biometric Device Project
This project will implement a limited pilot program to trial wearable biometric
technology for firefighters who face high-risk, physically intensive tasks in extremely
hot conditions. The devices are designed to offer feedback on key health indicators
directly related to heat stress, including pulse rate, core body temperature, and levels
of physical exertion. Immediate access to critical health data will enable more effective
monitoring and management of the risks associated with heat-related illnesses and
injuries among firefighters. The total investment for this initiative is estimated at
$311,553 with a contribution of approximately $40,637.35 coming from City funds.

Since 2008, the Fire Department has received more than $7 million in AFG funding.
These grants have been used to purchase portable radios, thermal imaging cameras,
Incident Safety Officer System Training, Automatic Chest Compression devices, Peer
Support Team Training and Physical Therapy Equipment upgrades, Peer Fitness


Page 205

Instructor Training and Fire Ground Survival Training and Equipment.

Procurement Information
The Fire Department will administer the grant in accordance with Administrative
Regulation 3.10.

Contract Term
The grant Period of Performance is twenty-four months and projected to begin on or
around Sept. 1, 2024.

Financial Impact
The grant is anticipated to have a 15 percent required cost match; funds are available
in the Fire Department's operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.




Page 206



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend Intergovernmental Agreement with Arizona Department of Health
Services for Immunization Services (Ordinance S-50731)

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
amendment to Agreement #159280 with the Arizona Department of Health Services to
extend the term of the agreement to immunize children and adults residing in the City
of Phoenix. Authorization also is requested for the City Treasurer to accept, and for the
City Controller to disburse, all related funds.

Summary
The Arizona Department of Health Services' (AZDHS) Arizona Immunization Program
Office strives to meet national immunization goals outlined by the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC). The Fire Department will assist in Vaccine-Preventable
Diseases (VPD) outbreaks and pandemic responses in coordination with equivalent
county public health preparedness programs and other relevant partners.
Preparedness activities may include mass vaccination exercises, identification of
priority groups and hard-to-reach populations for immunization, and identification of
critical infrastructure personnel. In addition to preparedness activities, this agreement
with AZDHS will provide for additional capacity for data entry, reminder recall activities,
and vaccine cold storage capacity.

Contract Term
The original term of the agreement was two years, commencing on July 1, 2022, and
ending on June 30, 2024, with an option to renew up to a five-year period. The new
term of the agreement is July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2025.

Financial Impact
The aggregate reimbursement over the life the contract will depend on the number of
immunization clinics hosted but will not exceed $10,000.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.




Page 207



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Agreement with the State of Arizona Department of Administration for the 9-1-1
Program (Ordinance S-50745)

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to authorize the Phoenix
Fire Department to retroactively apply for, accept, and enter into an agreement with the
State of Arizona Department of Administration Office of Grants and Federal Resources
to receive a 9-1-1 grant not to exceed $1,745,000. Further request authorization for the
City Treasurer to accept, and for the City Controller to disburse, all funds related to this
item.

Summary
The Arizona Department of Administration requires 9-1-1 planning at a local level as
referenced in the State of Arizona Administrative Code, Title 2, Chapter 1, Article 4
Emergency Telecommunications Services Revolving Fund. The State of Arizona Office
of Grants and Federal Resources' Arizona 9-1-1 Program Office has announced the
availability of funds for the Program to be distributed during the final six months of
Fiscal Year 2023-24. Funding will be available for multiple grants and allocated to each
System Administrator Agency to pay, on behalf of the Public Safety Answering Points
(PSAP), 9-1-1 system costs and approved projects that support the goals of the
Arizona 9-1-1 Program.

The System Administrator Agency for the Maricopa Region is the Phoenix Fire
Department. The City of Phoenix is the contracting agent of ongoing operations of the
9-1-1 system. This authority is given through signed resolutions by Maricopa
Association of Governments (MAG) member agencies. These agreements act as the
governing documents for the oversight of the 9-1-1 system design, implementation,
and management in the MAG Region.

The 9-1-1 Grant funding would be used to support:
· 9-1-1 networking, telecom, and Internet Protocol infrastructure.
· 9-1-1 related hardware, software, and maintenance equipment.
· Continue to fund current staff of the Regional 9-1-1 Services section.

Contract Term



Page 208

The grant Period of Performance is projected to begin on or around Jan. 1, 2024, and
end June 30, 2024.

Financial Impact
There is no cost to the City of Phoenix. All equipment, services, and personnel-related
costs are reimbursed by the State of Arizona.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.




Page 209



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Donation from Ladder Goo Graphics, LLC for Phoenix Fire Department Arizona
Task Force One Program (Ordinance S-50746)

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to accept a donation
valued at approximately $4,000 from Ladder Goo Graphics, LLC for the Phoenix Fire
Department's (PFD) Arizona Task Force One (AZ-TF1) Program. Further request
authorization for the City Treasurer to accept all funds related to this donation. If not
approved, the donation would be declined.

Summary
Ladder Goo Graphics, LLC wishes to express their appreciation for the AZ-TF1
Program by donating 800 Challenge Coins with PFD and AZ-TF1 logos on the front
and back to the Department. The coins will be distributed to members of AZ-TF1,
select members of the PFD, and other Federal Emergency Management (FEMA)
National Urban Search and Rescue (US&R) members as a means of promoting
comradery.

This request adheres to the Fire Department's charitable donations process.

Financial Impact
This donation does not require any matching funds. The funds will be used in
accordance with City policies.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.




Page 210



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
LexisNexis Accurint and Accurint Crime Analysis Services - RFA 18-009 -
Amendment (Ordinance S-50709)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 148401 with LexisNexis Risk Solutions FL, Inc. to add to the scope of work
the Accurint TRAX suite and add additional expenditures. Further request to authorize
the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional
expenditures will not exceed $45,000.

Summary
This contract amendment will provide the Accurint TRAX suite to the Phoenix Police
Department. The Accurint TRAX suite will be utilized by investigators to load data
including Call Detail Records (CDR's) and map mobile communication devices. The
CDR's are obtained through search warrants during criminal investigations and are
documented as evidence. Accurint TRAX suite reduces the time an investigator takes
to examine data and reduces investigative time on data entry.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on Aug. 31, 2028.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $45,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $1,099,000. Funds are available in the Police Department’s
budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· LexusNexus Accurint and Accurint Crime Analysis 148401 (Ordinance S-44909) on
Aug. 29, 2018;
· LexusNexus Accurint and Accurint Crime Analysis 148401 (Ordinance S-49969) on
June 28, 2023.



Page 211


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.




Page 212



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Act (LEMHWA) Implementation
Grant (Ordinance S-50744)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow the Police
Department to apply for, accept, and enter into an agreement with the Community
Oriented Policing Services (COPS) Office for the Law Enforcement Mental Health and
Wellness Act (LEMHWA) Implementation Grant. The grant amount is not to exceed
$200,000.

Summary
This program support efforts to protect the mental health and well-being of law
enforcement officers. Funding will be used to improve the delivery and access to
mental health and wellness services for law enforcement officers and their families
through the implementation of peer support, training, family resources, suicide
prevention and other promising practices for wellness programs.

The Employee Wellness Unit has initiated new programs focused on building
resilience in employees so they can better prevent, mitigate and recover from the
cumulative stress and exposure to traumatic incidents they experience as unique
elements of their work life. One of these new resilience-based programs that has
garnered a great deal of support and participation from the employees it serves is the
Human Performance Pilot Program. This program, sourced through the company O2X,
provides on-site mental and physical performance specialists backed by a suite of
technological resources. Through this program employees gain access to in person
mental performance consultations, injury evaluations, injury rehabilitation, and strength
and conditioning consultations, as well as coaching related to nutrition, sleep, coping
with stress and other holistic wellness related issues. The current program is only
accessible to a portion of the employees.

The Employee Wellness Unit will use this grant funding to expand this program, which
will add an additional on-site injury risk and reduction specialist to the program. This
specialist focuses on early identification and correction of physical health risks specific
to job functions, evaluations of untreated injuries, consultations for strength and
conditioning, readiness assessments and rehabilitation assistance. With this grant, the
Employee Wellness Unit will be able to open the Human Performance Pilot Program to


Page 213

the entire Police Department, encouraging resilient wellness strategies for the
challenges faced by police employees.

The grant application is due on April 23, 2024. If approved, the Police Department will
move forward with submitting our application.

Contract Term
The project period is for two years and will begin on Oct. 1, 2024.

Financial Impact
No matching funds are required.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.




Page 214



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Rental Car Center LED Light Retrofit -
Design-Bid-Build Services - AV15000073 (Ordinance S-50717)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to accept Sun Eagle
Corporation as the lowest-priced, responsive and responsible bidder and to enter into
an agreement with Sun Eagle Corporation for Design-Bid-Build Services for the
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Rental Car Center LED Light Retrofit project.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The fee for services will not exceed $11,197,948.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to replace existing lighting fixtures with energy efficient
sustainable Light Emitting Diode (LED) lighting in the Phoenix Sky Harbor International
Airport Rental Car Center (RCC).

Sun Eagle Corporation’s services include, but are not limited to: provide construction
services to replace existing metal halide high-intensity discharge (HID) and fluorescent
lighting fixtures with LED lighting in the RCC facility including interior core areas,
exterior, walkway, all levels of the garage, and small operator parcel parking lots.

The selection was made using an Invitation for Bids procurement process set forth in
section 34-201 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. Four bids were received on Nov. 28,
2023, and were sent to the Equal Opportunity Department for review to determine
subcontractor eligibility and contractor responsiveness in demonstrating
responsiveness to Small Business Enterprise program requirements.

The Opinion of Probable Cost and the two lowest responsive, responsible bidders are
listed below:
· Opinion of Probable Cost: $6,717,265.03
· Sun Eagle Corporation: $11,197,948
· Kimbrell Electric, Inc.: $11,581,157.72

Bidders who were deemed non-responsive are listed below, in alphabetical order:
· Fluoresco Services, LLC


Page 215

· Voss Electric Company DBA Voss Lighting, Inc.

Although the bid exceeds the Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Cost by more than 10
percent, it has been determined the bid represents a fair and reasonable price for the
required work scope. Additionally, the bid award amount is within the total budget for
this project.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is 470 calendar days from issuance of the Notice to
Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of
the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of
the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Sun Eagle Corporation will not exceed $11,197,948, including
all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Aviation Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.

Location
1805 E. Sky Harbor Circle South
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and Alan
Stephenson, the Aviation Department and the City Engineer.




Page 216



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Goodyear Airport Infield Paving - Phase 2 - Engineering Services - AV41000079
FAA (Ordinance S-50724)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with TRACE Consulting, LLC to provide Engineering Services that include design and
construction administration and inspection for the Goodyear Airport Infield Paving
Phase 2 project. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the
agreement as necessary within the Council-approved authority as provided below, and
for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The fee for all services
will not exceed $735,000.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services related to the
development, design and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the
documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This
authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to implement one of the recommendations of the 2018
Master Plan Update to improve infield areas between Runway 3/21 and Taxiway A at
Goodyear (GYR) Airport. The seven infield areas to be improved for Phase 2 of this
project are located north of Taxiway A1, between Taxiways A1 and A2, between
Taxiways A4 and A5, between Taxiways A5 and A6, between Taxiways A6 and A7,
between Taxiways A7 and A8, and between Taxiways A9 and A10. The goals of this
project include infield grading requirements per Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
Standards, infield paving as a safety improvement to mitigate the dangers of jet blast
and propwashing blowing around foreign object debris and to improve ease of
maintenance in the infields, and utility vault adjustments to be consistent with the new
grading and paving. Phase 1 of the GYR Infield Paving Project previously completed
design for three infields.


Page 217


TRACE Consulting, LLC's continued services include, but are not limited to: provide
design services, cost estimating, and specifications; assist with bidding for a Design-
Bid-Build delivery method; perform detailed survey of the limits of asphalt concrete
paving; geotechnical analysis; complete Engineer's Report required for FAA, Arizona
Department of Transportation (ADOT), and Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grant
compliance; provide construction administration and inspection services per AIP and
FAA/ADOT grant requirements; review contractor shop/record drawings and
submittals; verify compliance with contract documents; prepare inspection reports;
conduct warranty inspection; and other tasks as needed for a complete project. GYR
may opt to extend design services to other infields in future Phase 3.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes for GYR Infield Paving - Phase 1, with
the option for the selected consultant to provide continued services through Phase 2
and Phase 3.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for TRACE Consulting, LLC will not exceed $735,000, including
all subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Aviation Department's Capital Improvement Program. The
Aviation Department anticipates State Grant Funding for this project. The Budget and
Research Department will separately review and approve funding availability prior to
the execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up to agreement limits for
all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the agreement termination.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Engineering Services Agreement 155730 (Ordinance
S-48220) on Jan. 5, 2022.

Location
1658 S. Litchfield Rd., Goodyear, Ariz.
Council District: Out of City


Page 218

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and Alan
Stephenson, the Aviation Department and the City Engineer.




Page 219



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Trego/Dugan Aviation of Grand Island, Inc. Facility License Agreement at
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (Ordinance S-50733)

Request to Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a Facility License
Agreement with Trego/Dugan Aviation of Grand Island, Inc. at Phoenix Sky Harbor
International Airport for the use of 109 square feet of office space at Terminal 4.

Summary
Trego/Dugan Aviation of Grand Island, Inc. is operating under Commercial Use Permit
No. 525-23 for aircraft interior, lavatory, ramp, boarding gate cleaning, ground
handling, and passenger handling services and is under contract with Flair Airlines to
provide these services. The Facility License Agreement is month-to-month. Currently,
Trego/Dugan Aviation of Grand Island, Inc. is occupying the terminal space under a
Temporary License Agreement, which is set to expire on April 30, 2024.

Contract Term
The term of the Facility License Agreement is month-to-month.

Financial Impact
Estimated annual revenue to the City is $18,455.88 (monthly $1,537.99). The Facility
License Agreement terminal rental rate is subject to annual rate adjustments each year
on July 1st.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, 3800 East Sky Harbor Blvd.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 220



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Aviation Civil Construction - Job Order Contracting Services - 4108JOC227
(Ordinance S-50736)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate master
agreements with two contractors listed below to provide Aviation Civil Construction Job
Order Contracting services for the Aviation Department. Further request to authorize
execution of amendments to the agreements as necessary within the Council-
approved expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The total fee for all services will not exceed $80
million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunications, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize
inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City
Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real
property.

Summary
The Job Order Contracting (JOC) contractors’ services will be used on an as-needed
basis to provide Aviation Civil Construction Job Order Contracting services for
earthwork and dust stabilization; concrete paving and flatwork; asphalt overlay and
pavement rehabilitation; underground and above ground utilities (water, sewer,
electrical, etc.); A.D.A. modifications; roadway striping and markings; bridge repairs
(structural and maintenance); fence and gate installation and repairs; landscaping;
grading and drainage; safety and security systems (loop detectors, barriers,
attenuators, etc.); demolition; signage; airfield and landside maintenance; and minor
design/engineering and other work as needed. Additionally, the JOC contractors will be
responsible for fulfilling Small Business Enterprise program requirements.



Page 221

Procurement Information
The selections were made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-604 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-604(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals
received, including the scoring results, until an agreement is awarded. Four firms
submitted proposals and are listed below.

Selected Firms
Rank 1: ViaSun Corporation
Rank 2: Kiewit Infrastructure West Co.

Additional Proposers
Rank 3: Markham Contracting Co., Inc.
Rank 4: Rummel Construction, Inc.

Contract Term
The term of each master agreement is for up to five years, or up to $40 million,
whichever occurs first. Work scope identified and incorporated into the master
agreement prior to the end of the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may
extend past the termination of the master agreement. No additional changes may be
executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The master agreement value for each of the JOC contractors will not exceed $40
million, including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs. The total fee for all services
will not exceed $80 million.

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute job order
agreements performed under these master agreements for up to $4 million each. In no
event will any job order agreement exceed this limit without Council approval to
increase the limit.

Funding is available in the Aviation Department’s Capital Improvement Program and
Operating budgets. The Budget and Research Department will review and approve
funding availability prior to issuance of any job order agreement. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, 2485 E. Buckeye Road
Phoenix Deer Valley Airport, 702 W. Deer Valley Road


Page 222

Phoenix Goodyear Airport, 1658 S. Litchfield Rd., Goodyear, Ariz.
Council Districts: 1, 8 and Out of City

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and Alan
Stephenson, the Aviation Department and the City Engineer.




Page 223



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Bus Contingency Services RFQu 22-023 - Amendment (Ordinance S-50737)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 157269 with Via Adventures, Inc.; Contract 157281 with
J.E.T. Limousines & Transportation, LLC; Contract 157282 with Tour West America,
Inc.; and Contract 157284 with Industrial Bus Lines, Inc. to provide Bus Contingency
services for the Aviation Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will be up to
$1,500,000.

Summary
These contracts provide qualified operators of medium and large shuttle buses,
motorcoach buses, and driver resources to assist the Aviation Department in
transporting customers between airport facilities on an on demand/as-needed basis to
support the PHX Sky Train® contingency operations and other events. Initial estimates
related to the PHX Sky Train® contingency operations assumed the bus contractors
would be activated on an average of one time per year. Continued improvements of
the PHX Sky Train® system, including software upgrades, customer experience
enhancements, and preventative maintenance, have resulted in a need for the
provision of bus services on a more frequent basis in order to maintain a high level of
customer service during planned system outages. In the unlikely event of unplanned
system outages, it is imperative to have all possible means of transporting customers
available. The purpose of this request is to provide additional funds to ensure
continued high level of customer service provided to airport customers in the event
planned and unplanned PHX Sky Train® contingency operations are required.

Contract Term
The contract terms remain unchanged, ending on Oct. 31, 2027.

Financial Impact
Additional funds in the amount of $1,500,000 will increase the total value of the
contracts up to $1,672,000 for the contract terms. Funds are available in the Aviation
Department’s budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action


Page 224

The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Bus Contingency Contract RFQu 22-023 - Request for Award (Ordinance S-49042)

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 2485 E. Buckeye Road
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 225



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
DVT Hangars LLC Rent Credits for Taxiway Construction at Phoenix Deer Valley
Airport (Ordinance S-50740)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Ground Lease No.
154206 with DVT Hangars LLC (DVT Hangars) to establish rent credits in an amount
of up to $3.2 million for the construction of a portion of a taxiway at Phoenix Deer
Valley Airport (DVT).

Summary
DVT Hangars is requesting rent credits to pay for the construction of a portion of a
taxiway at DVT. DVT Hangars is currently constructing Phase 1 of a two-phase project
to build corporate hangars at DVT. Access to the runways from the development is
currently available via an existing taxiway, known as Taxiway Charlie that connects to
the taxi lane located within the DVT Hangars leased premises. DVT Hangars wishes to
improve runway access for its tenants by completing a portion of a second parallel
taxiway, known as Taxiway Delta that has been designed by DVT, but not constructed.
Completion of this segment of Taxiway Delta will improve the safety and efficiency of
ground operations at DVT by decreasing the distance of jets taxiing to and from the
DVT Hangars premises from the runway.

Contract Term
This amendment will have no impact to the DVT Hangars 40-year lease term.

Financial Impact
The rent credits will be applied to the DVT Hangars account at the rate of 75 percent of
their rent on a monthly basis until the rent credits are exhausted. It is estimated the
rent credits will be exhausted within 20 years of the 40-year lease. The time for the
rent credits to be exhausted will be reduced if DVT Hangars constructs and begins
payment of rent on Phase 2 of their development.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board, Business and Development Subcommittee
recommended approval of the item on March 7, 2024 by a vote of 3-0.
The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board recommended approval of the item on March 21,
2024 by a vote of 9-0.


Page 226


Location
Phoenix Deer Valley Airport, 702 W. Deer Valley Road
Council District: 1

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 227



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Intergovernmental Agreement with City of Prescott to Accept and Process
Recyclable Materials (Ordinance S-50727)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the City of Prescott to accept and process
recyclable materials collected in the City of Prescott and delivered to the City of
Phoenix's Material Recovery Facilities (MRF). Additionally, request the City Council to
grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code section 42-20(B) to authorize
inclusion of mutual indemnification language that otherwise would be prohibited by
Phoenix City Code section 42-18(A) and (B). Further request authorization for the City
Treasurer to accept, and for the City Controller to disburse, all funds related to this
item.

Summary
The City of Prescott has requested to enter into an Intergovernmental Agreement with
the City of Phoenix to accept and process its recyclable material. The City of Phoenix
can accept these materials with terms to address changing market conditions,
resulting in lower commodity prices and increased processing costs from
contamination in the recyclables. This IGA will authorize the City of Phoenix to charge
a processing fee to the City of Prescott for recycling tonnage processed at the City
MRFs, which is designed to ensure all costs associated with processing recyclables
are recovered by the fee. The terms of this IGA include:

• In a market with low recycling commodity prices, the City of Phoenix will charge a
processing fee to the City of Prescott, and no revenue share to Prescott will be
available.
• In a market with high recycling commodity prices, the City of Prescott will pay a
processing fee and will receive 50 percent of the net revenue share and the City of
Phoenix will receive the remaining 50 percent.

Annually, the City of Prescott will deliver up to 10,000 tons of recyclable materials to

Contract Term
The one-year term of this IGA will begin on or about July 1, 2024 and conclude on or


Page 228

about June 30, 2025. Provisions of the IGA include four, one-year options to extend
the agreement.

Financial Impact
The City of Prescott will pay the City of Phoenix to accept recyclables and cover all
expenses associated with proper handling of the materials. If recycle market prices
increase during the term of the agreement, Phoenix and Prescott would share the
additional revenue at a 50/50 split. Funds for the revenue share payments to the City
of Prescott are available in the Public Works Department's budget.

Location
North Gateway Material Recovery Facility, 30205 N. Black Canyon Hwy.
27th Avenue Material Recovery Facility, 3060 S. 27th Ave.
Council Districts: 2 and 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Public Works
Department.




Page 229



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Maintenance, Repair, and Replacement
Services - Amendment (Ordinance S-50732)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 157109 with Artic Air Heating & Cooling, Inc, Contract 157140 with Crawford
Mechanical Services, LLC, Contract 157108 with Haci Service, LLC, Contract 157107
with Chiller Services, Inc, and Contract 157119 with Pueblo Mechanical & Controls,
LLC to provide additional funding for Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC)
Maintenance, Repair, and Replacement Services. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures
included in the amendment will not exceed $7,600,000.

Summary
The purpose of this amendment is to provide additional payment authority that is
necessary due to planned Capital Improvement Program (CIP) work for equipment
replacement, and to provide services related to the installation and repair of HVAC
equipment, including chillers, cooling towers, heat pumps, gas equipment, package air
conditioners, and mini splits to more than 600 City owned facilities.

The contractors are responsible for performing preventative maintenance, equipment
repairs, startup services, and providing replacement parts for City of Phoenix units.

Contract Term
The contract expiration date is Sept. 30, 2024 and has one option year remaining.

Financial Impact
The initial authorization for the contract was for an amount not to exceed $10,086,000.
This amendment will increase the authorization for the contracts by an additional
$7,600,000 for a new amount not to exceed $17,686,000. Funding for this amendment
is available in the Public Works Department's operating budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously approved HVAC Maintenance, Repair, and Replacement
Services contracts 157109, 157140, 157108, 157107, and 157119 (Ordinance S-
48971) on Sept. 21, 2022.


Page 230


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Public Works
Department.




Page 231



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acquisition of Real Property for High Intensity Activated Crosswalks at Various
Locations Citywide (Ordinance S-50712)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to acquire all real property
and related property interests required by donation, purchase within the City's
appraised value, or by the power of eminent domain for the installation of High
Intensity Activated Crosswalks (HAWKs) at various locations Citywide. Further request
to authorize dedication of fee simple or easement land rights, land to public use for
right-of-way, or sidewalk purposes via separate recording instrument. Additionally,
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Summary
The acquisition of real property is required to facilitate the construction of HAWKs,
which provide pedestrians and bicyclists a secure passage for crossing streets, while
enhancing safety and minimizing traffic impediment. Improvements include striping,
signals, lighting, curbs, gutters, and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant
sidewalks and ramps.

The HAWKS will be installed at the following locations:
· 43rd Avenue and W. Hubbell Street
· 3rd Avenue and W. Buckeye Road
· Northern Avenue and Arizona Canal
· 7th Avenue and Western Canal

The parcels affected by this project are identified in Attachment A.

Financial Impact
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget.

Location
Various Locations
Council Districts: 4, 6 and 8




Page 232

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Street
Transportation and Finance departments.




Page 233
ATTACHMENT A
Property Identification

Acquisition of Real Property for High Intensity Activated Crosswalks at Various
Locations Citywide

The following improved and/or unimproved parcels affected by acquisition and
included in this request are identified by the Maricopa County Assessor’s parcel
number (APN) and the address or location.

APN Address / Location
103-21-003 4401 W. Encanto Blvd.
108-21-084 4255 W. Hubbell St.
112-24-132A 1023 S. 3rd Ave.
112-24-150 1024 S. 3rd Ave.
112-24-210A 1108 S. 3rd Ave.
112-24-213A 1121 S. 3rd Ave.
160-17-090A 902 E. Northern Ave.
160-17-090B 902 E. Northern Ave.
300-40-002F 7801 S. 7th Ave.
300-48-018 717 W. Baseline Road




Page 234



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Lift Station 80 Verdin - Construction Administration and Inspection Services -
WS90400102 (Ordinance S-50713)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into agreements with
Stanley Consultants, Inc., to provide Engineering Services that include construction
administration and inspection for the Lift Station 80 Verdin project. Further request to
authorize execution of amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-
approved authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The fee for services will not exceed $493,591.36.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services related to the
development, design and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the
documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This
authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The purpose of this project encompasses construction of a new 0.5-acre 1.57 million
gallons per day lift station facility, including a new wet well, two submersible pumps,
discharge force main piping, a 15-inch gravity sewer line, biofilter odor control system,
calcium nitrate (Bioxide) odor control facility, and new dual 12-inch High-Density
Polyethylene force main piping approximately 26,000 feet in length. There will be an
inspection component at approximately three wash crossings on a 16-inch water main
to be included in this work.

Stanley Consultants, Inc. services include, but are not limited to: on-site inspection and
review of work to ensure the quality of the executed work and verify the work is in
accordance with the construction documents and specifications; assist the contractor
in obtaining permits and approvals for work, providing oversight to ensure protection
against defects and deficiencies in the work of contractor and its sub consultants;


Page 235

confirm contractor’s work progress and quantities of work completed are on schedule
and meet standards; review of cost proposals, submittals, shop drawings, RFIs,
change orders, and other documents as directed by the City; attend the pre-
construction meeting and other project-related progress meetings; review the
construction schedule, assist with interpretations and clarifications to the contractor,
attend substantial, final completion and warranty walks, and assist in preparation of
punch list of corrective work to be performed by the contractor; perform re-inspection
of work and develop a list of necessary repairs, and inspect all completed repairs; and
assist with gathering as-builts, operation and maintenance manuals and Computerized
Maintenance Management System tags from the Design Engineer and contractor.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Six firms submitted proposals
and are listed below.

Selected Firm
Rank 1: Stanley Consultants, Inc.

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: Consor North America, Inc.
Rank 3: Entellus, Inc.
Rank 4: Brown and Caldwell, Inc.
Rank 5: HDR Engineering, Inc.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Stanley Consultants, Inc. will not exceed $493,591.36,
including all subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the


Page 236

agreement termination.

Location
South of Sonoran Desert Drive, north of Cave Creek Dam, between Apache Wash and
Cave Creek Wash
Council District: 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Ginger Spencer and Alan
Stephenson, the Water Services Department and the City Engineer.




Page 237



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend Ordinance S-49816 for Acquisition of Real Property for Roadway
Improvements Along Van Buren Street from 7th to 24th Streets (Ordinance S-
50718)

Request the City Council amend Ordinance S-49816 for authorization to acquire
additional real property and related property interests for the roadway improvements
along Van Buren Street from 7th to 24th streets.

Summary
Ordinance S-49816 authorized the acquisition of real property for the roadway
improvements along Van Buren Street from 7th to 24th streets. Property rights from
one additional parcel will be acquired for the project, which consists of traffic signal
upgrades, medians, landscape, and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant
sidewalks and ramps. All other conditions and stipulations stated in Ordinance S-
49816 remain the same.

The additional parcels impacted by this project are identified in Attachment A.

Financial Impact
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Ordinance S-49816 was adopted on June 14, 2023.

Location
1305 E. Van Buren St., identified by Maricopa County Assessor parcel number 116-45-
011A
1118 E. Van Buren St., identified by Maricopa County Assessor parcel number 116-26-
1219 E. Van Buren St., identified by Maricopa County Assessor parcel number 116-45-
1745 E. Van Buren St., identified by Maricopa County Assessor parcel number 115-04-



Page 238

Along the Northwest corner of Van Buren Street, Unassesed parcel
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Street
Transportation and Finance departments.




Page 239
ATTACHMENT A
Property Identification

Acquisition of Real Property for Roadway Improvements Along Van Buren Street
from 7th to 24th Streets
The following improved and/or unimproved parcels affected by acquisition and
included in this request are identified by the Maricopa County Assessor’s parcel
number (APN) and the address or location.

APN Address / Location
116-45-011A 1305 E. Van Buren St.
116-26-016 1118 E. Van Buren St.
116-45-185 1219 E. Van Buren St.
115-04-128 1745 E. Van Buren St.
Unassesed parcel Along the Northwest corner of Van Buren Street




Page 240



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Grant Easements, Execute Real Property Licenses and
Agreements, and Dedicate Right-of-Way for Fire Station 62 (Ordinance S-50719)

Request authorization to grant easements, execute all necessary real property
licenses and agreements, and dedicate right-of-way required for the construction of
Fire Station 62.

Further request that the City Council grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code
section 42-20 to authorize inclusion of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise would be prohibited by Phoenix City Code section 42-18
within documents for those transactions between the City and other government
entities and Salt River Project for irrigation facilities.

Summary
Fire Station 62 is being constructed within Maricopa County Assessor parcel number
101-14-005G at Lower Buckeye Road, near the 93rd Avenue alignment. The Real
Estate Division will grant the necessary easements including irrigation within the
existing right-of-way and on City-owned property; and execute real property licenses
and agreements required for utilities needed to construct and operate the fire station.
Right-of-way for public improvements required by the Planning and Development
Department will be dedicated to public use for right-of-way purposes via separate
recording instrument.

Location
Lower Buckeye Road, near the 93rd Avenue alignment
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Street
Transportation and Finance departments.




Page 241



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Intergovernmental Agreement with the Arizona Department of Transportation to
Amend the Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development Grant Project
on 35th Avenue, Interstate 10 to Camelback Road (Ordinance S-50726)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the Arizona Department of Transportation
(ADOT) to amend the scope of work for the Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage
Development (BUILD) grant project along 35th Avenue between Interstate 10 (I-10)
and Camelback Road.

Summary
On April 15, 2020, City Council approved the BUILD grant application submittal to
implement a series of safety improvements on 35th Avenue between I-10 and
Camelback Road. The grant was awarded, and the Street Transportation Department
created the BUILD grant improvement project to implement critical safety
enhancements for pedestrians and motorists along this corridor. These enhancements
include the installation of three pedestrian hybrid beacons, modernization of
approximately eight intersections with upgrades to signals and LED streetlighting
corridor-wide, construction of raised medians, pavement restoration, and the
installation of a broadband fiber network to facilitate intelligent and connected
transportation systems.

Concurrently, ADOT has a project with proposed improvements at the 35th Avenue
and Indian School Road / Grand Avenue intersection that will impact the proposed
safety improvements outlined in the BUILD grant project. The ADOT initiatives aim to
change the grade at this intersection to separate vehicular traffic from the Burlington
Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway network and vehicular traffic on Grand Avenue by
building a bridge overpass for 35th Avenue across this intersection. The proposed
ADOT project complements and enhances the safety goals of the BUILD project. The
ADOT project footprint extends from Weldon to Glenrosa avenues along 35th Avenue.

The purpose of this IGA is to mitigate any potential overlap between the two projects
by allowing ADOT to implement the safety improvements within the ADOT project
footprint and eliminating the duplicate efforts from the BUILD grant project’s scope of
work. This will ensure the safety intent of the 35th Avenue BUILD grant application is


Page 242

achieved. The IGA will be used as supporting documentation for the BUILD grant
amendment with the Federal Highway Administration currently underway for the 35th
Avenue, I-10 to Camelback Road, safety improvement project.

Contract Term
The agreement will be effective on the date it is executed by all the governing
organizations and shall remain in effect for 30 years.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact for this agreement.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
(Ordinance S-46531) on April 15, 2020.

Location
35th Avenue, Weldon to Glenrosa avenues
Council Districts: 4 and 5

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Street
Transportation Department.




Page 243



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Request to Revoke Contract 155182-0 (Revocable Permit 202156) (Ordinance S-
50728)

Subject to City Code section 31-80(H), revocable permits authorized by the City
Manager are subject to revocation at any time at the discretion of the Street
Transportation Director with ratification by the City Council.

Summary
A revocable permit was granted through Contract 155182-0 for the use and
maintenance of approximately 104 linear feet of 36" existing fence within the City
public right-of-way (ROW) adjacent to the property at 6802 North 24th Place. The
request to revoke the existing contract is made to allow for the sale of the property to
another person(s). Staff is entering into a new contract with the new buyer for the
same encroachment.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to this request.

Location
6802 North 24th Place
Council District: 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson, the Street
Transportation Department and the City Engineer.




Page 244



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Sweetwater Avenue Sewer Relief - Engineering Services - WS90500317
(Ordinance S-50714)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into agreements with
Consor North America, Inc., to provide Engineering Services that include an alignment
study, design, and construction administration and inspection for the Sweetwater
Avenue Sewer Relief project. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to
the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved authority as provided below,
and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The fee for services
will not exceed $1.56 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services related to the
development, design and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the
documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This
authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The purpose of this relief sewer project is to perform an alignment study and to design
the relief sewer replacing approximately 5,000 linear feet of existing 12-inch sewer with
new 15-inch and 18-inch generally along Sweetwater Avenue from 23rd Avenue to
15th Avenue. This project is part of the Sanitary Sewer Relief Program. This ongoing
program intends to review and manage the capacity of Phoenix’s wastewater
collection system to avoid sanitary sewer overflows.

Consor North America, Inc.'s services include, but are not limited to: conduct an
alignment study for the relief sewer; sewer capacity analysis; assist with obtaining any
required easements and licenses; data collection and field survey; perform
geotechnical investigations; prepare design concept report and design documents
including technical specifications, special provisions, and drawings for constructing the


Page 245

relief sewer project; preliminary and final construction cost estimates; project
schedules and hold progress meetings and workshops as needed to complete the
work; coordinate with outside agencies; required cultural surveys; and obtain any
required local, county, state, or national permits and approvals; provide bid phase
assistance, including answering bidder questions, preparing and issuing addenda;
provide construction administration and inspection, and other work as required for a
completed project.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Four firms submitted proposals
and are listed below:

Selected Firm
Rank 1: Consor North America, Inc.

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
Rank 3: Entellus, Inc.
Rank 4: Sustainability Engineering Group LLC

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Consor North America, Inc., will not exceed $1.56 million,
including all subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.

Location
General Location: Sweetwater Avenue from 23rd Avenue to 15th Avenue


Page 246

Council District: 3

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Ginger Spencer and Alan
Stephenson, the Water Services Department and the City Engineer.




Page 247



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Water Facilities General Construction - Job Order Contracting Services
Amendment - 4108JOC202 (Ordinance S-50715)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to
Agreements 156389 with Garney Companies, Inc. and 156390 with J.R. Filanc
Construction Company, Inc. to provide additional Water Facilities General Construction
Job Order Contracting Services. Further request to authorize execution of
amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure
authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item. The additional fee for all services included in these amendments will not
exceed $30 million.

Summary
The Contractors' services will be used on an as-needed basis to provide Water
Facilities General Construction Job Order Contracting services for installations and/or
replacement of mechanical equipment, such as raw water, sludge and/or booster
pumps, bar screen components, submersible mixers, valves and/or actuators;
installation and/or replacement of chemical feed systems, chemical storage tanks,
chemical piping, including chlorine building odor control scrubbers, chlorine
evaporators, halogen valves and chlorine piping which are regularly inspected and
improved at the water facilities; installations of instrumentation and electrical
equipment, such as analyzers, meters, sensors, variable frequency drives, and
Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition system components, including conduit
and/or wiring; programming remote terminals units, programmable logic controllers
and instrumentation to control facilities in accordance with City Operation Division's
control strategy; general work such as building modifications, painting, specialized
maintenance and concrete, masonry, or structural steel work; emergency repair
services; pre-construction and post construction services; engineering design services
when necessary or required; and water, sewer, and sludge lines rehabilitation and/or
replacement within the water plants.

These amendments are necessary because the City will be managing work at the
Lake Pleasant Water Treatment Plant. In addition, the amount of work under these
contracts continues to increase and the available capacity for each contractor is being
utilized faster than anticipated. These amendments will provide additional funds to the


Page 248

agreements.

Contract Term
The term of the agreements remain unchanged from the original Notices to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreements. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
· The initial agreements for Water Facilities General Construction Job Order
Contracting Services was approved for an amount not to exceed $37.5 million each,
including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.
· This amendment will increase the agreements by an additional $15 million each, for
a new total amount not to exceed $52,500,000 each, including all subcontractor and
reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement
Program budgets. The Budget and Research Department will review and approve
funding availability prior to the issuance of any job order agreement. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Water Facilities General Construction Job Order
Contracting Services Agreement 156389 with Garney Companies, Inc. and Agreement
156390 with J.R. Filanc Construction Company, Inc. (Ordinance S-48714) on June 15,
2022.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Ginger Spencer and Alan
Stephenson, the Water Services Department and the City Engineer.




Page 249



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
HSQ Miser SCADA System Replacement Servers, Parts, and Services
Requirements Contract - RFA 2324-WPC-593 Request for Award (Ordinance S-
50720)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
HSQ Tech, Inc. to provide system replacement servers, parts, software upgrades and
telephone support for the Water Services Department. Further request to authorize the
City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contract
will not exceed $1,050,000.

Summary
This contract will provide system replacement servers, parts, software upgrades and
telephone support for the HSQ Miser SCADA (Supervisory, Control, and Data
Acquisition) System. This system is used for monitoring and controlling the process of
water distribution for remote facilities. Without Support from the manufacturer, failures
would go unresolved which may cause a disruption of water delivery to our customers.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reason:
Special Circumstances Without Competition. The HSQ Miser System software and
hardware is proprietary to HSQ Tech.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about April 3, 2024 for a 5-year term with two 1-year
options to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $1,050,000 for the 7-year aggregate
term.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department's operating budget.


Page 250


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Water
Services Department.




Page 251



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Request to Enter into a Development Agreement with a Developer to Provide
Funds to Own, Operate and Maintain Two Force Mains (Ordinance S-50722)

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a
Development Agreement with M Brothers 67th Avenue, LLC, to allow the Developer to
provide funds in exchange of having the City own, operate and maintain two small
diameter force mains in Phoenix. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
accept and distribute the necessary funds related to this item.

Summary
M Brothers 67th Avenue, LLC (referred to herein as the "Developer"), is planning to
develop a property at the northeast corner of 67th Avenue and Pinnacle Peak Road in
Phoenix (referred to herein as the "Development"). Due to the site topographic
constraint, the Development could not gravity flow sewer into the City's collection
system. The Development does not generate enough wastewater flow to warrant a
public lift station and force mains. Therefore the Development was allowed to design
and construct a private lift station with a one and half inch private force main to convey
wastewater to the City's sewer main north of the Development along 67th Avenue.
However, 67th Avenue is in the City of Peoria's Right-of-Way (ROW) and they do not
allow private utilities located inside their ROW.

The Developer filed a technical appeal asking the City to allow this small diameter
force main to be public while the lift station remains private. Because this property is in
the City's service area and neither a gravity public sewer nor a private force main
option to the City's sewer system is technically feasible, the technical appeal was
approved with stipulations including entering into a Development Agreement with the
City to cover all future operational and maintenance costs with the force mains
incurred by the City in perpetuity.

According to the Development Agreement, the Developer, at its own expense, will
design, permit and construct two, one and a half inch force mains in accordance with
the City's public force main standards. After the City accepts the force mains, the City
will own, operate and maintain the two force mains. The City will invoice the Developer
on all future maintenance costs (defined as the collective costs of all maintenance,
repair or replacement, including labor costs associated with the two force mains). The


Page 252

Developer must make full payment within 30 days of receipt of the invoice or submit a
notification of dispute according to the development agreement. The City may add
liens to the property for any unpaid or unsettled maintenance costs.

Contract Term
The contract term will be for perpetuity.

Financial Impact
The City will take two small diameter force mains for operation and maintenance.
Since the maintenance costs of those two force mains will be reimbursed by the
Developer or its Successors-in-Interest, there will be no financial impact to the City.

Location
Council District 1

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Water
Services Department.




Page 253



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
HVAC Maintenance and Repair Services - Amendment (Ordinance S-50730)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee to allow additional
expenditures under agreements 152375, 152362, and 152364 with Adobe Insulation
Inc. dba Adobe Energy Management Co., Artic Air Heating & Cooling, and HACI
Services, LLC for the purchase of HVAC Maintenance and Repair Services for Water
Services Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $1,823,000.

Summary
The purpose of this amendment is to request additional funds for providing
preventative maintenance services, repairs and replacement parts on all heating,
ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) units and replacement units on an as-needed
basis for the Water Services Department.

This amendment is necessary to ensure repair and replacement work continues
uninterrupted until the end of contract in June 2025. Additional funds are needed due
to equipment price increases, and scheduling of preventative maintenance services.

Agreement Term
The agreement term remains unchanged, ending on June 30, 2025.

Financial Impact
· The initial authorization for HVAC Maintenance and Repair was for an expenditure
not-to-exceed $7,500,000.
· This amendment will increase the agreement by an additional $1,823,000, for a new
total not-to-exceed agreement value of $9,323,000.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· HVAC Maintenance and Repair Agreement (Ordinance S-46664) on June 3, 2020.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Water
Services Department.


Page 254



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - Terra Terra Hills Subdivision - PLAT 230109 - Northeast Corner of
Tonapah Drive and 51st Avenue

Plat: 230109
Project: 17-3889
Name of Plat: Terra Terra Hills Subdivision
Owner: Guru's Faith, LLC
Engineer: Thomas E. Granillo, RLS
Request: A 20-Lot Detached Single-Family Subdivision Plat
Reviewed by Staff: Feb. 14, 2024
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located at the northeast corner of Tonopah Drive and 51st Avenue
Council District: 1

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 255



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Zoning, General Hearing, Historic Preservation, and Abandonment Signage - IFB
19-137- Amendment (Ordinance S-50723)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 150788 with Looks Good Printing and Sign Services for
the purchase of zoning, abandonment and historic preservation signs for the Planning
and Development Department and Historic Preservation Office. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional
expenditures will not exceed $90,000.

Summary
This contract will provide the Planning and Development Department and the Historic
Preservation Office with labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and transportation
necessary to furnish, install, replace, and remove zoning, abandonment, and general
hearing signs; as well as Historic Preservation blue street signs and aluminum plaques
on an as-needed basis.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on Aug. 31, 2024.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $90,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $240,000. Funds are available in the Planning and
Development Department’s budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Zoning, General Hearing, Historic Preservation, and Abandonment Signage
Contract 150788 (Ordinance S-45947) on Aug. 28, 2019.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 256



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-104-23-8 -
Northeast Corner of 36th Street and Beverly Road (Ordinance G-7243)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
R1-6 BAOD (Approved R1-10 BAOD) (Single-Family Residence District, Baseline Area
Overlay District, Approved Single-Family Residence District, Baseline Area Overlay
District), S-1 BAOD (Approved R1-10 BAOD) (Ranch or Farm Residence, Baseline
Area Overlay District, Approved Single-Family Residence District, Baseline Area
Overlay District), and S-1 BAOD (Ranch or Farm Residence, Baseline Area Overlay
District) to R1-6 BAOD (Single-Family Residence District, Baseline Area Overlay
District) to allow single-family residential.

Summary
Current Zoning: R1-6 BAOD (Approved R1-10 BAOD) (0.83 acres), S-1 BAOD
(Approved R1-10 BAOD) (6.74 acres), and S-1 BAOD (10.95 acres)
Proposed Zoning: R1-6 BAOD
Acreage: 18.52
Proposal: Single-family residential

Owner: Miguel and Yvonne Montiel Family Trust; All Other Properties, LLP; and DK
Square Investments, LLC
Applicant/Representative: Adam Baugh, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The South Mountain Village Planning Committee heard this item on Feb.
13, 2024, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, with
modifications and additional stipulations, by a vote of 13-0-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on March 7, 2024, and
recommended approval, per the staff memo dated March 6, 2024, with a modified
stipulation and a deleted stipulation, by a vote of 8-0.

Location
Northeast corner of 36th Street and Beverly Road
Council District: 8


Page 257

Parcel Address: 7825, 7833, 7965, 7977, 7989, and 8035 S. 36th St.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 258
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (Z-104-23-8) FROM R1-6 BAOD (APPROVED R1-10
BAOD) (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT, BASELINE
AREA OVERLAY DISTRICT, APPROVED SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT, BASELINE AREA OVERLAY DISTRICT),
S-1 BAOD (APPROVED R1-10 BAOD) (RANCH OR FARM
RESIDENCE, BASELINE AREA OVERLAY DISTRICT,
APPROVED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT, BASELINE
AREA OVERLAY DISTRICT), AND S-1 BAOD (RANCH OR FARM
RESIDENCE, BASELINE AREA OVERLAY DISTRICT) TO R1-6
BAOD (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT, BASELINE
AREA OVERLAY DISTRICT)
____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of an 18.52-acre site located at the northeast

corner of 36th Street and Beverly Road in a portion of Section 1, Township 1 South,

Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from

0.83 acres of “R1-6 BAOD (Approved R1-10 BAOD)” (Single-Family Residence District,

Baseline Area Overlay District, Approved Single-Family Residence District, Baseline

Area Overlay District), 6.74 acres of “S-1 BAOD (Approved R1-10 BAOD)” (Ranch or

Farm Residence, Baseline Area Overlay District, Approved Single-Family Residence



Page 259
District, Baseline Area Overlay District), and 10.95 acres of “S-1 BAOD” (Ranch or Farm

Residence, Baseline Area Overlay District) to “R1-6 BAOD” (Single-Family Residence

District, Baseline Area Overlay District).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. Tracts “C”, “H”, “I”, and “G”, as generally depicted on the site plan date
stamped January 17, 2024, shall be reserved for open space, as modified by
the following stipulations, and approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

2. The undisturbed hillside area (above 10% per the approved Slope Analysis)
shall remain undisturbed and be dedicated with a preservation easement
except for Lot 27 and development of private accessways as generally
depicted on the site plan date stamped January 17, 2024, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

3. The existing home on Lot 27 shall remain and any improvements to this lot
shall be reviewed and approved through a Hillside/Grading and Drainage Plan
by the Planning and Development Department.

4. A physical feature (such as retaining wall, rock wall, etc.) shall be provided
along the west and south portions of Tract "J", as generally depicted on the site
plan date stamped January 17, 2024, to protect the undisturbed hillside area,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

5. A minimum of three distinct exterior accent materials for each required
standard plan within the subdivision shall be provided, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

6. If fencing is proposed along the perimeter of the site, the fencing shall be a
minimum of 75% view fencing, except on Lots 1, 50, 51. 52, and 53 as depicted
on the site plan date stamped January 17, 2024, as approved by the Planning



Page 260
and Development Department. Any perimeter fencing requirement adjacent to
the Highline Canal is subject to review and approval of SRP.

7. All landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper large
canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings,
with five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

8. A minimum of 10% of the required shrubs, shall be a milkweed or other native
nectar species, and shall be planted in groups of three or more and maintained,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

9. The sidewalk along 36th Street shall be a minimum of five feet in width and
detached with a minimum five-foot wide landscape strip located between the
sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following standards, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, drought-tolerant
shade trees planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve a minimum of 75 percent live
coverage at maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment for installing the required plants.

10. Prior to preliminary plat approval, documentation shall be provided that
demonstrates participation in the Environmental Protection Agency’s
WaterSense certification program, or an equivalent program, as approved by
the Planning and Development and Water Services departments.

11. A WaterSense inspection report from a third-party verifier shall be submitted
that demonstrates successful participation in the Environmental Protection
Agency’s WaterSense certification program, or an equivalent program, prior to
certificate of occupancy, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

12. In addition to the landscape materials listed in the Baseline Area Master Plan
Plant List Cercidium Hybrid (Desert Museum Palo Verde), Quercus Virginiana
(Live Oak), And Pistacia X 'Red-Push (Red Push Pistache), may be permitted
as approved by Planning and Development Department and shall be utilized
throughout the subdivision including the front, side, and rear yards of individual
residential lots. This restriction shall be included in the Covenants, Conditions,
and Restrictions for the subdivision.

13. Landscaping in common areas shall be maintained by permanent and



Page 261
automatic/water efficient WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers (Smart
Controller) to minimize maintenance and irrigation water consumption for all on
and offsite landscape irrigation.

14. Pressure regulating sprinkler heads and drip lines shall be utilized in any turf
areas to reduce water waste.

15. Natural turf shall only be utilized on individual single-family lots (behind the
front yard); required retention areas (bottom of basin), and functional turf areas
within common areas, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

16. A minimum of two green infrastructure (GI) techniques for stormwater
management shall be implemented per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green
Infrastructure and Low-Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater
Management, as approved or modified by the Planning and Development
Department.

17. Swimming pools on individual single-family lots shall be limited to 600 square
feet in size.

18. A public connection to the existing 36th Way stub street shall be provided or
the existing 36th Way right-of-way shall be terminated per the City of Phoenix
termination standards, as required by the Street Transportation Department.

19. An enhanced connection shall be provided on the southern site boundary to
allow for direct pedestrian access to the adjacent Highline Canal. The
developer shall construct an 8-foot-wide shaded pedestrian pathway consisting
of decorative material such as brick, pavers or alternative material providing at
the entryway, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

20. A sidewalk easement shall be dedicated over a clearly defined pedestrian
pathway(s) providing a public connection through the site from the existing 36th
Way access point on the northern site boundary to the Highline Canal and the
adjacent wash/trail system, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

21. Replace unused driveways with sidewalk, curb, and gutter. Also, replace any
broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps on all streets and
upgrade all off-site improvements to be in compliance with current ADA
guidelines.

22. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards



Page 262
23. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.

24. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

25 If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

26. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

27. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

28. Bench seating shall be provided near the western pedestrian connection,
located between Lots 39 and 50, as depicted on the site plan date stamped
January 17, 2024, and as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

29. At least 50% of the residential homes abutting the canal (Lots 28 through 39,
as depicted on the site plan date stamped January 17, 2024) shall be a
maximum of one story or 15 feet in height, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

30. The developer shall provide evidence of undertaking reasonable efforts to work
with the adjacent homeowners association to the north, to close off the former
access drive east of the “Groves at Baseline” subdivision by installing a solid 4-
foot tall block wall with a 2-foot view fence atop, at the northeast corner of the
site and at the driveway entrance along Baseline Road, with a locked access
gate on the south end for maintenance as needed.

31. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) shall be submitted to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the
analysis is reviewed and approved by the Street Transportation Department.



Page 263
The TIA shall include a signal warrant analysis for 36th Street and Baseline
Road. If the approved TIA determines that a signal is warranted and is
approved by the Street Transportation Department for installation, the
developer shall be responsible for its proportionate share of the funding and
construction of all recommendations of the analysis.

32. The subdivision shall have no more than 61 lots.

33. On-site lighting within open space areas shall be accomplished with low level,
uniform light fixtures dispersed throughout the site with a lumen rating of 3,000
or less.

34. The conceptual elevations for future development (new homes) shall be
reviewed and approved, with specific regard to the Single-Family Design
Review Guidelines, by the Planning Hearing Officer through the public hearing
process, including review by the South Mountain Village Planning Committee,
for stipulation modification prior to preliminary site plan approval. This is a
legislative review for conceptual purposes only. Specific development
standards and requirements will be determined by the Planning Hearing
Officer, and the Planning and Development Department.

35. Any invasive plants shall not be allowed.

36. Native materials, or similar materials, shall be used for all exterior perimeter
wall columns, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 3rd day of April, 2024.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:




Page 264
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (2 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 265
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-104-23-8

A portion of the North half of Section 1, Township 1 South, Range 3 East of the Gila
and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, more particularly
described as follows:

Commencing at the North quarter corner of said Section 1;

Thence along the West line of the Northeast quarter of said Section 1, South 00
degrees 31 minutes 29 seconds West a distance of 835.13 feet to the beginning of a
non-tangent curve whose center bears North 89 degrees 28 minutes 44 seconds
West a distance of 500.00 feet;

Thence along the arc of said non-tangent curve through a central angle of 16
degrees 47 minutes 26 seconds and an arc length of 146.52 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING;

Thence South 72 degrees 41 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of 30.00 feet to a
point on the Easterly right of way line of 36th Street;

Thence North 89 degrees 40 minutes 26 seconds East a distance of 527.92 feet;

Thence North 00 degrees 34 minutes 55 seconds East a distance of332.04 feet;

Thence North 89 degrees 51 minutes 09 seconds East a distance of 464.64 feet to a
point on the West property line of Blossom Hills, a subdivision, as recorded in Book
899 of Maps, Page 7, records of Maricopa County, Arizona;

Thence along said West line, South 00 degrees 31 minutes 34 seconds West a distance
of 666.62 feet;

Thence North 89 degrees 58 minutes 24 seconds East a distance of 129.98 feet to a
point on the arc of a non-tangent curve whose center bears South 61 degrees 57
minutes 55 seconds East a distance of 323.00 feet, also being a point on the Northerly
right of way line of the Highline Canal, as recorded in Book 122 of Deeds, Pages 1
through 9, records of Maricopa County, Arizona;

This along said right of way line the following 6 courses:

Thence along the arc of said non-tangent curve through a central angle of 7 degrees 35
minutes 20 seconds and an arc length of 42.78 feet;

Thence South 20 degrees 26 minutes 45 seconds West a distance of 120.01 feet to the
beginning of a tangent curve whose center bears North 69 degrees 33 minutes 15
seconds West a distance of 187.90 feet;



Page 266
Thence along the arc of said tangent curve through a central angle of 58 degrees 34
minutes 01 seconds and an arc length of 192.07 feet;

Thence South 79 degrees 00 minutes 46 seconds West a distance of366.74 feet to
the beginning of a tangent curve whose center bears North 10 degrees 59 minutes 14
seconds West a distance of 158.18 feet;

Thence along the arc of said tangent curve through a central angle of 56 degrees 46
minutes 19 seconds and an arc length of 156.73 feet; Thence North 44 degrees 12
minutes 55 seconds West a distance of 176.41 feet to the beginning of a tangent
curve whose center bears South 45 degrees 47 minutes 05 seconds West a distance
of228.18 feet;

Thence along the arc of said tangent curve through a central angle of 50 degrees 23
minutes 19 seconds and an arc length of200.67 feet;

Thence South 85 degrees 23 minutes 46 seconds West a distance of 123.36 feet;

Thence South 89 degrees 19 minutes 11 seconds West a distance of 70.30 feet;

Thence North 00 degrees 28 minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 144.59 feet to
the beginning of a tangent curve whose center bears North 89 degrees 31 minutes 14
seconds West a distance of 117.87 feet;

Thence along the arc of said tangent curve through a central angle of 46 degrees 01
minutes 50 seconds and an arc length of 114.78 feet;

Thence North 45 degrees 31 minutes 27 seconds West a distance of 47.96 feet to a
point on the arc of a non-tangent curve whose center bears North 45 degrees 26
minutes 34 seconds West a distance of 500.00 feet;

Thence along the arc of said non-tangent curve through a central angle of 27 degrees
14 minutes 28 seconds and an arc length of 237.80 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Note: The above described parcel contains 784,908 square feet or 18.0190 acres,
more or less.




Page 267
Page 268



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
***REQUEST TO CONTINUE (SEE ATTACHED MEMO)*** Public Hearing and
Resolution Adoption - General Plan Update PlanPHX 2025 - GPA-12-23
(Resolution 22191)

Request to hold a public hearing and adopt a resolution on the General Plan
Update as recommended by the Planning Commission on March 7, 2024. State
Law requires that the City Council hold at least one public hearing before adoption
of the General Plan, and that the City Council adopt the General Plan by an
affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of its members. It is tentatively scheduled that

Summary
The General Plan provides policy direction for growth, redevelopment, conservation
and infrastructure investment for the city. The Phoenix General Plan was last
adopted by the Phoenix City Council and approved by voters in 2015. In January of
2023, the Planning and Development Department, with the leadership of the
Phoenix City Council, initiated an effort to update the General Plan and termed the
project PlanPHX.

Applicant: City of Phoenix, Planning Commission
Representative: City of Phoenix, Planning and Development Department

Staff Recommendation: Approval of GPA-12-23 as shown in Exhibit A of the Staff
Report (Attachment B).
VPC Action: All 15 Village Planning Committees (VPCs) considered the request.
Twelve VPCs recommended approval, per the staff recommendation; one VPC
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, with modifications; and two
VPCs recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, with direction, as
reflected in Attachment C.
PC Action: State Law requires that the Planning Commission hold at least two
public hearings before approving the General Plan. The Planning Commission held
the first public hearing on Feb. 22, 2024. The Planning Commission held the
second public hearing on March 7, 2024, and recommended approval, per the
Addendum A Staff Report (Attachment D), by a vote of 8-0, as reflected in


Page 269

Attachment E.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning
and Development Department.




Page 270
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT



To: Alan Stephenson Date: March 27, 2024
Deputy City Manager

From: Joshua Bednarek
Planning and Development Director

Subject: CONTINUANCE OF ITEM 76 ON THE APRIL 3, 2024, FORMAL AGENDA -
PUBLIC HEARING AND RESOLUTION ADOPTION - GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
PLANPHX 2025 - GPA-12-23 (RESOLUTION 22191)

Item 76, GPA-12-23 is a request to hold a public hearing and adopt a resolution on the
General Plan Update. The General Plan provides policy direction for growth, redevelopment,
conservation and infrastructure investment for the city.

Following the Planning Commission hearing, minor updates are needed to include
outstanding comments from some departments, the public and councilmembers. Staff
recommends continuing this item to the April 17, 2024, City Council Formal meeting.



Approved: 4- �
AlanSephenson
Deputy City Manager




Page 271
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION



RESOLUTION


A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE PHOENIX GENERAL PLAN,
APPLICATION GPA-12-23.

____________


WHEREAS, the Phoenix City Council adopted the Phoenix General Plan

on March 4, 2015; and,

WHEREAS, the General Plan was ratified by the voters on August 25,

2015; and,

WHEREAS, State law requires a city or town council to readopt an

existing general plan or adopt a new general plan by July 1, 2025; and,

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, PlanPHX Leadership Committee,

village planning committees, City residents, and City staff worked together to create

an update to the General Plan; and,

WHEREAS, the goals and policies produced as part of the update to the

General Plan have received extensive review by the general public and have been

further refined to reflect public input and the need for consistency, coordination, and

the need of the City as a whole; and,




-1- Resolution

Page 272
WHEREAS, a comprehensive, long-range plan that complies with Arizona

statutory requirements is needed to provide a vision and sense of direction for a city;

and,

WHEREAS, such a plan is also needed to provide a framework for growth,

redevelopment, conservation, and infrastructure investment that will inform the

decisions of residents, developers, land owners, City staff, the Planning Commission

and the City Council;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PHOENIX, as follows:

SECTON 1. That the 2025 Phoenix General Plan dated March 18, 2024,

is hereby adopted.

SECTON 2. That the Planning and Development Department, as the

City’s planning agency, with the input from the village planning committees and other

boards and commissions and recommendations from the Planning Commission, shall

monitor, evaluate and recommend revisions to the General Plan annually, and

comprehensively every ten years.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 3rd day of April 2024.



MAYOR




ATTEST:


____________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
-2- Resolution



Page 273
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney



By:___________________________
___________________________



REVIEWED BY:


______________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




-3- Resolution



Page 274
ATTACHMENT B




GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS


Application: GPA-12-23

Applicant: Planning Commission

Requested Change: To update the General Plan to provide policy direction for
growth, redevelopment, conservation, and infrastructure
investment for the city.

Reason for Requested Change: As required by Arizona Revised Statutes.

Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the request.

BACKGROUND

Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) require every city in Arizona to prepare and maintain a long-
range general plan that provides a vision and policies for the growth and development of the
city. The Phoenix General Plan was last adopted by the Phoenix City Council and approved by
voters in 2015. In January of 2023, the Planning and Development Department (PDD), with the
leadership of the Phoenix City Council, initiated an effort to update the Phoenix General Plan
generally referred to as PlanPHX. The project's launch included the appointment of a PlanPHX
Leadership Committee by the City Council.

The General Plan provides a powerful medium for residents to strategize on how the city will
grow. This General Plan update focused on the following:

1. Building on and refining the existing General Plan Framework.

2. Aligning General Plan’s goals and strategies with other City Council adopted initiatives.

3. Outlining what we will be working on to accomplish goals for the next 10 years.




Page 275
Staff Report
GPA-12-23
pg. 2

BUILDING ON AND REFINING THE EXISTING GENERAL PLAN FRAMEWORK

This General Plan Update builds on the concepts established in the 2015 General Plan that a
unified policy framework of all the City’s various initiatives is one of the best strategies to
employ to realize a collective vision, values and goals.

The Vision to be “a more connected city” has been carried through for decades of planning in
Phoenix and consistently referenced in plans, policies and initiatives to this day holding its place
atop the General Plan Framework. The next tier within the framework has been slightly
modified to further address “Planning Equity” through the lens of the already established 3
Community Benefits. These updated Community Benefits provide critical guidance in achieving
the Vision and informing Goals in a more inclusive and equitable way. Each of the 5 Core Values
have also been updated to align with new goals and priorities. The 7 Strategic Tools continue to
organize an abundance of implementation resources and actions. The most noticeable update
is the introduction of a new Core Value to Create a Network of Vibrant Cores, Centers, and
Corridors across the city. This new framework reinforces alignment and connections across all
city plans, policies, and initiatives to enhance the quality of life for all Phoenicians.




Page 276
Staff Report
GPA-12-23
pg. 3

ALIGNING GENERAL PLAN’S GOALS AND STRATEGIES WITH OTHER CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED
INITIATIVES

The PlanPHX Five Core Values and Subsection/Goals provide a purposeful and strategic
alignment with a variety of City and community driven Policies, Plans and Initiatives celebrating
the city’s commitment to continuously improving, evolving and addressing opportunities and
challenges through a holistic and unified policy framework to become a more connected
Phoenix. This policy alignment to the Five Core Values is illustrated below.




Page 277
Staff Report
GPA-12-23
pg. 4

WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO TOGETHER NEXT

The Plan highlights a strategic set of actions for each of the 5 Core Values. These actions will not
only respond to the General Plan’s goals, but the goals of other City Council adopted policy
initiatives. This approach reinforces the city’s commitment to better harness the collective
vision that was developed together as a community the past eight years across a series of
initiatives like the Housing Phoenix, Climate Action, and Road Safety Action plans to name just a
few. The commitment to keeping the process going, short term actions and immediate next
steps are outlined on pages 225-236. Some examples of these actions are illustrated below:




RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends approval of GPA-12-23.


EXHIBIT

Exhibit A: Draft 2025 General Plan




Page 278
ATTACHMENT C
GPA-12-23: General Plan Update
-
Village Planning Committee Summary Results
Recommendation
Village Recommendation Vote
Date
Ahwatukee Foothills 1/22/24 Approved 7-1
Alhambra 2/27/24 Approved 13-0
Camelback East 1/9/24 Approved 16-0
Central City 1/8/24 Approved with direction 13-0
Deer Valley 1/16/24 Approved 9-0
Desert View 1/9/24 Approved 8-0
Encanto 1/8/24 Approved 12-0
Estrella 1/16/24 Approved 9-0
Laveen 1/8/24 Approved with modifications 6-1
Maryvale 1/10/24 Approved 7-2
North Gateway 2/8/24 Approved 6-0
North Mountain 1/17/24 Approved with direction 12-0
Paradise Valley 1/8/24 Approved 12-0
Rio Vista 2/13/24 Approved 4-0
South Mountain 1/9/24 Approved 12-0-1




Page 279
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23

Date of VPC Meeting January 22, 2024
Request Amend the General Plan to incorporate the 2025
General Plan Update
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 7-1


VPC DISCUSSION:

STAFF PRESENTATION
Matteo Moric, staff, provided a presentation reviewing the General Plan Update 2025
process, highlighting specific elements of the draft plan, the action items identified
moving forward, and the timeline. Mr. Moric noted the item is in front of the Village
Planning Committee for a recommendation.

QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE AND STAFF RESPONSE
Chair Gasparro asked if staff was looking for an action on the General Plan Update
today. Mr. Moric said yes that staff is hoping to get an action.

Clifford Mager said much of the General Plan is high level and strategic, and asked
what items in the plan are more relevant to the community of Ahwatukee Foothills. Mr.
Moric explained through previous discussions with the Committee the highest rated
core value was “Connecting People and Places,” and the other Core Values ranked in
order of priority were “Strengthen Our Local Economy”, “Create a Network of Vibrant
Cores, Centers, and Corridors”, “Build The Sustainable Desert City” and “Celebrate Our
Diverse Communities & Neighborhoods”.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.

MOTION
Toni Broberg motioned to recommend approval of GPA-12-23. Kimberly Barua
seconded the motion.

VOTE
7-1, Motion to recommend approval of GPA-12-23 passed with Committee Members
Barua, Broberg, Mager, Maloney, Meier, Pritchette, Fisher and Chair Gasparro in favor;
and Schiller opposed.


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 280
Ahwatukee Foothills Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23


STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:

No comments.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 281
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23


Date of VPC Meeting February 27, 2024
Request Amend the General Plan to incorporate the 2025
General Plan Update
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 13-0


VPC DISCUSSION:

STAFF PRESENTATION

Samuel Rogers, staff, provided a presentation reviewing the General Plan Update
2025 process, highlighting specific elements of the draft plan, the action items
identified moving forward, the timeline, and explained that the item is at VPC for
recommendation.

QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE

Committee Member Maurita Harris asked about the General Plan Survey turnout.
Mr. Rogers stated that he did not know the survey numbers but would ask his team
and report back.

Committee Member Jak Keyser asked about the roadshow event activity and spoke
about the roadshow event attendance. Mr. Rogers stated that the participants voted
for the three Core Values most important to them using tokens provided at the event.

Committee Member Alexander Malkoon stated that there was not clear winner
regarding the number of tokens each Core Value received. Committee Member
Keyser stated that it was good that there was not a clear winner. Mr. Rogers agreed
with Committee Member Malkoon and Committee Member Keyser.

Committee Member Krietor stated that City of Phoenix had satisfied the State of
Arizona General Plan process requirements and stated that he would like to endorse
the General Plan.

FLOOR/PUBLIC DISCUSSION CLOSED: MOTION, DISCUSSION, AND VOTE



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882

Page 282
Alhambra Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23


MOTION
Committee Member David Kreitor made a motion to recommend approval GPA-12-
23 per staff recommendation. Committee Member Jak Keyser seconded the motion.

Committee Member Keyser stated that good presentations bring out the best in
people.

VOTE
13-0, motion to recommend approval of GPA-12-23 per staff recommendation passed
with Committee members Farina, Fitzgerald, Harris, Jones, Keyser, Krietor, Malkoon,
Pimentel, Sanchez, Shore, Smith, Camp, and DeGraffenreid in favor.

STAFF COMMENTS:

No comment.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 283
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23



Date of VPC Meeting January 9, 2024
Request Amend the General Plan to incorporate the 2025
General Plan Update
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 16-0


VPC DISCUSSION:
No members of the public registered to speak on this item.
STAFF PRESENTATION:
John Roanhorse, staff provided an introduction and status report of the development
the General Plan update noting many committee members have been directly involved
in the review and meetings that have been conducted since March 2023. Mr.
Roanhorse stated that the presentation is intended to provide a summary and to obtain
any remaining details and adjustments before proceeding to the Planning Commission.
Mr. Roanhorse said the discussion is also an opportunity to answer questions and
provide a preview. Mr. Roanhorse reviewed the policy framework and the alignment to
bring together the vision of the plan and what would be the next steps. Mr. Roanhorse
reviewed and discussed the focus of what we do next noting examples of Place Type
and Key Corridors as applicable to the Camelback East Village. Mr. Roanhorse
discussed the road show format and the information presented and the feedback that
was obtained from eight event conducted at various locations. Mr. Roanhorse discussed
the road shows and the results from the exercises from each village addressing the core
values. Mr. Roanhorse noted the results from the Camelback East village compared to
the overall results. Mr. Roanhorse stated the importance of what was heard from the
road shows as well as the online surveys because this information will be included in
adjusting the draft general plan. Mr. Roanhorse described the action items in the
general plan and how they will be instrumental in forming and creating changes for



Page 284
Camelback East Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23

development and design. Mr. Roanhorse noted that the online survey had over 1100
responses. Mr. Roanhorse displayed the calendar of actions that will occur in moving
the general plan to the committees then two the Planning Commission in February and
March, ultimately it is expected that the draft general plan will eventually be presented
to the Council.
QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE:
Chair Swart commented that the work and engagement from Committee Member
Paceley and the participation of the committee members was substantial thought out
the development of the General Plan.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
None.
STAFF RESPONSE:
None.
MOTION:

Committee Member Barry Paceley motioned to recommend approval of GPA-12-23.
Committee Member Grace seconded the motion.
VOTE:

16-0; motion to recommend approval of GPA-12-23 passes with Committee members
Abbott, Augusta, Baumer, Bayless, Beckerleg Thraen, Garcia, Grace, Jurayeva,
Langmade, O’Malley, Paceley, Schmieder, Sharaby, Whitesell, Fischbach, and Swart in
favor.




Page 285
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23


Date of VPC Meeting January 8, 2024
Request Amend the General Plan to incorporate the 2025
General Plan Update
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation with direction
VPC Vote 13-0


VPC DISCUSSION:

STAFF PRESENTATION
Anthony Grande, staff, provided a presentation reviewing the General Plan Update
2025 process, highlighting specific elements of the draft plan, the action items identified
moving forward, and the timeline. Mr. Grande noted that the item is at the VPC for
recommendation.

QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE
Committee Member Panetta asked about how the City measures results. Mr. Grande
replied that the plan defines action items, and the Department has staff that will be
working on the next steps along with the VPC.

Committee Member Olivas asked how often the General Plan is reviewed. Mr.
Grande replied that the General Plan is updated every 10 years, but specific policy
plans are developed in the interim.

Committee Member Rachel Frazier Johnson asked about projects under the Arts
and Culture Master Plan tying into the General Plan or the work the VPC does. Mr.
Grande replied that other plans developed by the City should refer back to the General
Plan policy statements. Ms. Johnson asked how the VPC knows when projects are
taking place to track that they are following the General Plan. Mr. Grande replied that
City projects use interdepartmental collaboration and ideally will bring items to the VPC
for information or involve stakeholders.

Ms. Olivas stated that at least 85 percent of projects should be in alignment with the
General Plan. Mr. Grande stated that every project the Department reviews should tie
back to General Plan policies.



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882

Page 286
Central City Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23
January 8, 2024


Committee Member Starks asked about dashboards to track progress on General
Plan goals. Mr. Grande noted that the document has links to some dashboards that
track measurable items and that specific policy plans have more measurable goals.
Vice Chair Gaughan highlighted that each initiative has its own goals with separate
tracking.

Committee Member Sherman asked how often other policy plans will be updated. Mr.
Grande stated that it will vary by plan, but the new General Plan update provides new
policy statements as a foundation for other plans to be updated in the future. Mr.
Panetta noted that some plans will be updated more often depending on the subject of
the plan.

Chair O’Grady stated that specific policy plans will have more measurable goals than
the General Plan.

Mr. Panetta stated that a dashboard that has a collection of the all the City’s policy
plans in one place would be helpful. Vice Chair Gaughan stated that right now it
requires searching around for each policy plan.

Ms. Olivas stated that the General Plan should be revisited annually. Mr. Grande
highlighted the upcoming work the Department plans to do with VPCs after the General
Plan is approved.

PUBLIC COMMENTS

None.

STAFF RESPONSE

None.

MOTION
Patrick Panetta made a motion to recommend approval of GPA-12-23. Jeff Sherman
seconded the motion for approval.

Rachel Frazier Johnson requested a friendly amendment to recommend approval
with direction for staff to provide annual updates on progress of initiatives. Patrick
Panetta and Jeff Sherman agreed to the friendly amendment.

VOTE
13-0; Motion to recommend approval of GPA-12-23 with direction passed, with
Committee Members Burton, Gonzales, R. Johnson, Lockhart, Nervis, Olivas, Panetta,
Sherman, Sonoskey, Starks, Vargas, Gaughan, and O’Grady in favor.



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 287
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23


Date of VPC Meeting January 16, 2024
Request Amend the General Plan to incorporate the 2025
General Plan Update
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 9-0


VPC DISCUSSION:
No members of the public registered to speak on this item.

STAFF PRESENTATION
Matteo Moric, staff, provided a presentation reviewing the General Plan Update 2025
process, highlighting specific elements of the draft plan, the action items identified
moving forward, and the timeline. Mr. Moric noted the item is at the Village Planning
Committee for recommendation.

QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE
None.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.

STAFF RESPONSE
None.

MOTION:
Committee Member Susan Herber motioned to recommend approval of GPA-12-23.
Committee Member Braden Lopez-Biggs seconded the motion.

VOTE:

9-0, motion to recommend approval of GPA-12-23 passes with Committee Members
Davenport, Greenberg, Herber, Hoffman, Lopez-Biggs, Romero, Sutphen, Freeman,
and DiLeo in favor.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 288
STAFF COMMENTS:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 289
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23


Date of VPC Meeting January 9, 2024
Request Amend the General Plan to incorporate the 2025
General Plan Update
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 8-0


VPC DISCUSSION:

No members of the public registered to speak on this item.

STAFF PRESENTATION
Anthony Grande, staff, provided a presentation reviewing the General Plan Update
2025 process, highlighting specific elements of the draft plan, the action items identified
moving forward, and the timeline. Mr. Grande noted that the item is at the VPC for
recommendation.

QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE
Committee Member Kollar asked for clarification on the timeline. Mr. Grande replied
with details of the timeline.

PUBLIC COMMENTS

None.

MOTION:
Vice Chair Lagrave made a motion to recommend approval of GPA-12-23. Committee
Member Reginald Younger seconded the motion.

VOTE:
8-0; the motion to recommend approval of GPA-12-23 passed with Committee Members
Barto, Douvalakis, Israel, Kollar, Nowell, Younger, Lagrave, and Bowser in favor.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 290
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23



Date of VPC Meeting January 8, 2024
Request Amend the General Plan to incorporate the 2025
General Plan Update
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 12-0



VPC DISCUSSION:

No members of the public registered to speak on this item.

STAFF PRESENTION
John Roanhorse, staff provided an introduction and status report of the development
the General Plan update noting many committee members have been directly involved
in the review and meetings that have been conducted since March 2023. Mr.
Roanhorse stated that the presentation is intended to provide a summary and to obtain
any remaining details and adjustments before proceeding to the Planning Commission.
Mr. Roanhorse said the discussion is also an opportunity to answer questions and
provide a preview. Mr. Roanhorse reviewed the policy framework and the alignment to
bring together the vision of the plan and what would be the next steps. Mr. Roanhorse
reviewed and discussed the focus of what we do next noting examples of Place Type
and Key Corridors as applicable to the Encanto Village. Mr. Roanhorse discussed the
road show format and the information presented and the feedback that was obtained
from eight event conducted at various locations. Mr. Roanhorse discussed the road
shows and the results from the exercises from each village addressing the core values.
Mr. Roanhorse noted the results from Encanto village compared to the overall results.
Mr. Roanhorse stated the importance of what was heard from the road shows as well as
the online surveys because this information will be included in adjusting the draft
general plan. Mr. Roanhorse described the action items in the general plan and how




Page 291
Encanto Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23

they will be instrumental in forming and creating changes for development and design.
Mr. Roanhorse noted that the online survey had over 1100 responses. Mr. Roanhorse
displayed the calendar of actions that will occur in moving the general plan to the
committees then two the Planning Commission in February and March, ultimately it is
expected that the draft general plan will eventually be presented to the Council.

QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMETTEE
Committee Member Montaño Searles commented that he attended the road shows
and staff did a good job on the activities in particular the youth town hall was fun and
engaging.

Chair Wagner commented that she reviewed the General Plan and compared the
documents and there are so many things have been developed and noted such as
water policy and a realistic emphasis and noted the shift from focusing on downtown to
the village cores.

PUBLIC COMMENTS

None
STAFF RESPONSE
John Roanhorse noted that that Planning and Development staff have been very
engaged and worked extensively to prepare, review and assemble the draft General
Plan. Mr. Roanhorse thanked the committee for the responsiveness and review of the
information.
Chair Wagner commented that transportation is an important issue and also the canals
noting that Phoenix has more miles of canals than Venice or Amsterdam. Chair Wagner
stated that for many years canals were a hazard and now there has been a shift to
explore how that can be more effectively utilized. Mr. Roanhorse responded that canals
have been an important part of the developing pedestrian network and has been a
complimentary feature for development. Mr. Roanhorse noted that the City has made
extensive improvements to the canal banks with development standards and promote
pedestrian use. Mr. Roanhorse discussed a rezoning project along the canal bank at 7th
Street and Minnezona Avenue and the requirements for connectivity, landscaping and
pedestrian improvements as part of the development.
MOTION:

Committee Member Jayson Matthews motioned to recommend approval of the
request to amend the General Plan to incorporate the 2025 General Plan Update per
the staff recommendation. Committee Member G.G. George seconded the motion.




Page 292
Encanto Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23

VOTE:

12-0; motion to recommend approval of the request to amend the General Plan to
incorporate the 2025 General Plan Update passes with Committee Members Carranza,
Doescher, George, Jewett, Kleinman, Matthews, Perez, Picos, Procaccini, Montaño
Searles, Tedhams and Wagner in favor.




Page 293
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23

Date of VPC Meeting January 16, 2024
Request Amend the General Plan to incorporate the 2025
General Plan Update
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 9-0


VPC DISCUSSION:

Staff Presentation:

Nayeli Sanchez Luna summarized the General Plan Update for 2025. Ms. Sanchez Luna
noted that planning equity would be part of the three community benefits of prosperity,
health and well-being, and environment. Ms. Sanchez Luna stated the new core value that
would be utilized to create a network of vibrant cores, centers, and corridors. Ms. Sanchez
Luna summarized the numerous roadshow events and the timeline for the General Plan
Update.

Questions From the Committee:

Chair Perez stated that the Land Use Map should have been updated as part of this
General Plan Update. Chair Perez stated that the Department has created a proposed
timeline for upcoming projects such as identifying cores and corridors and updating the
Character Plan. Chair Perez added that the Estrella core has been bisected by a freeway
and she has talked to numerous members on the leadership committee for a new core
location. Chair Perez stated that several meetings will be required to address the issues.

Public Comment:

None.

Committee Discussion:

None.

Motion:
Vice Chair Beth Cartwright motioned to recommend approval for GPA-12-23, per the
staff recommendation. Tino Hernandez seconded the motion.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 294
Vote:
9-0, motion to recommend approval of GPA-12-23 passed with Committee Members
Barquin, Burd, Hernandez, Morris, Serrette, Wallace, Cartwright, Ceniceros, and Perez in
favor.

Staff comments regarding VPC Recommendation:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 295
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23

Date of VPC Meeting January 8, 2024
Request Amend the General Plan to incorporate the 2025
General Plan Update
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation with
modifications
VPC Vote 6-1

VPC DISCUSSION:

One member of the public registered to speak on this item.

Staff Presentation:

Ms. Sanchez Luna summarized the General Plan Update for 2025. Ms. Sanchez Luna
noted that planning equity would be part of the three community benefits of prosperity,
health and well-being, and environment. Ms. Sanchez Luna stated the new core value
that would be utilized to create a network of vibrant cores, centers, and corridors. Ms.
Sanchez Luna summarized the numerous roadshow events and the timeline for the
General Plan Update.

Questions From the Committee:

Ms. Jensen asked how the committee could retain Laveen’s unique characteristics. Ms.
Sanchez Luna noted that each village has a Character Plan and that the committee
has created stipulations that further enforce Laveen’s character.

Mr. Ortega asked how the committee can enforce the character if developers are not
willing to accommodate the characteristics. Mr. Ortega stated that numerous proposals
do not align with Laveen but when the committee is in opposition, the Planning
Department or Planning Commission still recommend approval.

Chair Abegg added that numerous proposals are not required to go through the Village
Planning Committee. Chair Abegg noted that staff should enforce Laveen development
standards even if a proposal doesn’t go through the rezoning or PHO process.

Ms. Jensen reiterated that an issue that the committee faces is when they vote to deny
a proposal but Planning Commission votes in favor. Chair Abegg stated that that is
when City Council’s opinion is important. Chair Abegg added that the City Council
makes the final decision. Chair Abegg stated that the Planning and Development

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 296
Laveen Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23

Department, Village Planning Committee, and Planning Commission are all in odds with
one another. Chair Abegg noted that cases that have concerns or modifications should
not be on the Planning Commission consensus agenda.

Ms. Perrera noted that she would like more information on how Planning Commission
members are appointed. Ms. Perrera supported the idea of Planning Commission being
made up of Village Planning Committee members. Chair Abegg noted that Planning
Commission members that are on Village Planning Committees reach out to the
committee and respect the opinion and the final vote. Ms. Perrera noted that the
Planning Commission must understand each village’s perspective.

Mr. Ortega stated that Laveen is one of the toughest committees and other villages just
accept development. Mr. Ortega noted that other villages do not require a list of design
and site improvement. Mr. Ortega voiced his frustration when the committee votes in
denial but Planning Commission or the Planning and Development Department keep
supporting the proposal.

Patrick Nasser-Taylor stated that he agreed with Committee Member Ortega’s
comments. Mr. Nasser-Taylor noted that the purpose of the committee is to keep and
promote Laveen’s character and that Phoenix should not look entirely like Phoenix
Downtown.

Chair Abegg noted that she has listened to Planning Commission discussions and
most of the time, Planning Commission does not have any conflicts with the proposals
in the City. Chair Abegg added that if staff provided an alternative recommendation from
that in the Village Planning Committee, the Planning Commission votes on staff’s
recommendation. Chair Abegg stated that she supported a cohesive decision between
Planning Commission and the Village Planning Committee where the same.

Ms. Perrera noted that there was a list of undeveloped parks on page 256 and that all
were in Estrella and Laveen. Ms. Perrera noted that the General Plan noted a pool in
the proposed Estrella Regional Park but that there were no pools proposed for Laveen.
Ms. Perrera added that the General Plan focuses on equity but that she would like to
see a clear definition of equity. Ms. Perrera noted that she has received pushback from
departments regarding a shaded splash pad. Ms. Perrera stated that if South Phoenix
needs a shaded splash pad, that does not mean that everyone needs one. Ms. Perrera
added that that is equality not equity when it came to resources and amenities. Ms.
Perrera noted that page 61 had a map displaying all the employment corridors. Ms.
Perrera stated that the Tech Corridor is not displayed on any of the maps or figures. Ms.
Perrera added that if the City has been promoting this area as a Tech Corridor, then it
should be added in the General Plan. Ms. Perrera appreciated the discussion regarding
the Dobbins Road and Baseline Road Scenic Plans and the focus on the Rio Salado.
Ms. Perrera noted that there were inconsistencies between the proposal for funding and
implementation methods. Ms. Perrera noted that impact fees were reduced before the
COVID-19 pandemic and that the City has denied any additional contributions from
developers. Chair Abegg added that there have been situations where developers are
willing to provide additional contributions but are denied by the City. Chair Abegg added

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 297
Laveen Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23

that she has asked the City for exact numbers but has yet to receive an answer. Chair
Abegg stated that new forms of funding must be accepted if it is going to be presented
in the General Plan.

Ms. Perrera noted that there was also a section regarding a restoration plan for the next
ten years. Ms. Perrera stated that plans must be put in place for South Phoenix where
there is poor air quality. Ms. Perrera added that the Land Use Map must be updated.
Ms. Perrera noted that development often contradicts the General Plan but is not
required to file for a General Plan Amendment. Ms. Perrera stated that the Land Use
Map needed to be updated so that CED could bring the job and tech corridor that is
needed for Laveen. Ms. Perrera added that there is a large mismatch between all
department within the City. Ms. Perrera stated that the General Plan has goals and
tasks that will address this moving forward but that she hopes that they are attained.

Chair Abegg noted that there had a to be a responsible way to develop the village and
asked for the total number of residential units needed within the village to meet the
City’s goals. Chair Abegg also noted that the land use map should be enforced and that
the village had to have responsible development rather than letting the market dictate
the number of units.

Jennifer Rouse noted that affordable housing was not attainable and that rental rates
have been overpriced. Ms. Rouse noted that she appreciated the public outreach but
that she was disappointment with the turnout. Ms. Rouse added that additional outreach
should have been provided. Ms. Rouse stated that equity needed to be provided to
south Phoenix and that parks are not being built or renovated when the City has
promised improvements in the past. Ms. Rouse stated that Planning Commission
members should be required to reach out to Village Planning Committee members for
their opinion on items. Ms. Rouse voiced her concerns regarding the promises heard for
the technical corridor along the Loop 202 Freeway. Ms. Perrera voiced her agreement.
Ms. Rouse stated that a school was proposed in the technical corridor. Ms. Rouse
added that Dobbins Road was meant to be a scenic corridor and that no movement has
been proposed by the City. Ms. Rouse added that the process where Planning
Commission members are appointed needed to be modified. Ms. Rouse stated
commission members needed to respect the committee’s comments and stipulations.

Ms. Jensen noted that the biggest issue was that Planning Commission does not take
all aspects into consideration. Ms. Jensen noted that the committee needed to have
more power than persuasion and that Planning Commission should consider the
modification before agreeing to remove any proposed stipulations.

Mr. Ortega asked where the events were held. Ms. Sanchez Luna displayed the slide
with all the locations. Ms. Ortega stated that an event should have been hosted in
Laveen. Ms. Rouse voiced her agreement and stated that there were limited events
held south of Van Buren Street. Ms. Jensen voiced her agreement and added that the
committee has not been as present as other Village Planning Committees.

Public Comment:

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 298
Laveen Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23


T.J. Henshau voiced his support for the General Plan Update. Mr. Henshau stated that
he supported creating vibrant cores and that he was looking forward to high density
housing and intense commercial uses such as a movie theater. Mr. Henshau noted that
the would like bicycle paths and pedestrian paths to be more connected and that
Dobbins Road should be developed as a scenic corridor. Mr. Henshau voiced his
disappointment in the technical corridor and the approval of warehouses and distribution
centers. Mr. Henshau noted that no one was following the General Plan Land Use Map
designation and that the City should not ignore the committee’s recommendations. Mr.
Henshau supported the idea of the Village Planning Committee having more power than
recommendation and noted that policy frameworks needed to be created to give the
committee more power.

Mr. Perrera thanks Mr. Henshau for his comment and stated the General Plan is setting
up framework to address some of Laveen’s concerns. Mr. Henshau added that the City
should support the Village Planning Committee and not work against it.

Committee Discussion:

Mr. Ortega asked how fast they could voice their concerns regarding the General Plan.
Chair Abegg recommended contacting the Planning and Development Department,
Planning Commission, and City Council.

Ms. Perrera asked if the General Plan could define equity, add the technical corridor
and creating policy to align with the proposed modifications.

Chair Abegg noted that measurable time frames needed to be added to prevent delays
such as establishing Dobbins Road Scenic Corridor.

Ms. Jensen asked if the committee could write a letter regarding the General Plan
Update to the Mayor and City Council. Chair Abegg agreed and requested staff to add
an agenda item for next month.

Chair Abegg, Ms. Perrera, and Ms. Jensen discussed items that needed to be
addressed for the General Plan Update

Mr. Ortega asked for the General Plan Update to have a specific chapter or section for
each village, especially Laveen. Mr. Ortega noted that Laveen should not be looped in
with the rest of the City. Ms. Perrera noted that having a section on each village will
create an excessive document and that Laveen has policy plans that protect its
character. Mr. Ortega stated that Laveen should not be grouped with other villages that
allow any type of development.

Chair Abegg listed the proposed changes. Ms. Perrera added that she would like
equity to be defined. Ms. Jensen added that it had to align with different villages
requiring different needs.


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 299
Laveen Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23

Mr. Ortega asked how the committee can continue to push their concerns. Chair
Abegg noted that an agenda item will be added for the next meeting. Mr. Ortega
requested the role of the committee to be defined. Chair Abegg noted that the
committee has been defined as a recommending body.

Motion:
JoAnne Jensen motioned to recommend approval for GPA-12-13 per the staff
recommendation with the following modifications:
• Include the Tech Corridor in the Employment Areas
• Include specific, measurable, achievable timebound metrics for goals such as
identifying corridors and exploring/establishing funding for infrastructure (e.g.,
parks).
• Update the Land Use Map
• Add steps to codify and enforce Village Character Plans
• Define equity, particularly in regards to bringing necessary resources to each
Village.
Francisco Barraza seconded the motion.

Vote:
6-1, motion to recommend approval of GPA-12-23 per the staff recommendation with
modifications passed with Committee members, Barraza, Jensen, Nasser-Taylor,
Perrera, Rouse, and Abegg in favor and Committee Member Ortega in opposition.

Staff comments regarding VPC Recommendation:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 300
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23

Date of VPC Meeting January 10, 2024
Request Amend the General Plan to incorporate the 2025
General Plan Update
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 7-2


VPC DISCUSSION:

STAFF PRESENTATION
Matteo Moric, staff, provided a presentation reviewing the General Plan Update 2025
process, highlighting specific elements of the draft plan, the action items identified
moving forward, and the timeline. Mr. Moric noted the item is in front of the Village
Planning Committee for a recommendation.

QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE AND STAFF RESPONSE
Warren Norgaard asked if when it goes to the public vote if it does not get approved.
Mr. Moric stated he was not aware of any penalties that the City would face, but it is
required by State Law to be updated every 10 years. Mr. Moric also said that he was
optimistic it would pass.

Chair Derie said chances are the City would probably have to review and have the
General Plan Update on a special election.

Chair Derie explained the reasoning behind having the police and fire department in the
“Celebrate Our Diverse Communities & Neighborhoods Core Value” was because in the
General Plan Update it was to setup the infrastructure for police and fire department. To
ensure with growth in the area the services can be provided.

Mr. Norgaard asked what specific changes were made from the meeting in November
until now. Mr. Moric stated that planning equity was added to the framework across
each Village and what we would work on next together. Mr. Moric added that we noticed
housing and water were big priorities.

Chair Derie asked if the exercise with the poker chips snapshot included all Villages.
Mr. Moric said yes it did and stated the item was up for a vote to amend the General
Plan to incorporate the 2025 General Plan Update.



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 301
Maryvale Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23


Meli Acevedo felt the plan was super broad and she wanted to know more specifically
of how equity would be addressed across all Villages.

Mr. Moric said that each Village may have different focuses and different Villages would
focus on their priorities. And said it lays out some of the action plans of what we are to
do next.

Chair Derie said the vote would be to tell the Planning Commission and City Council
that the General Plan is moving in the right direction.

PUBLIC COMMENTS

None.

MOTION
Patricia Jimenez motioned recommend approval of GPA-12-23. Zeke Valenzuela
seconded the motion.

VOTE
7-2, Motion to recommend approval of GPA-12-23 passed, with Committee Members
Battle, DePascal, DuBose, Jimenez, Valenzuela, Weber and Derie in favor; Acevedo
and Norgaard opposed.

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:

None




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 302
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23



Date of VPC Meeting February 8, 2024
Request Amend the General Plan to incorporate the 2025
General Plan Update
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 6-0


VPC DISCUSSION:

No members of the public registered to speak on this item.

Chandra McCarty joined the meeting during this item, bringing the quorum to six
members.

Staff Presentation:
Adrian Zambrano, staff, provided a refresher of the City’s commitment for this update
to be strategic and focused, noting that this update purposefully aligned with and
celebrated existing Citywide policies, plans, and initiatives as a unified policy
framework. Mr. Zambrano highlighted the two important changes to the General Plan.
Mr. Zambrano provided a refresher of Part IV of the General Plan, which outlines the
City’s commitment to keeping the process going and which summarizes short-term
actions and immediate next steps, including planning for place types to further identify,
evaluate, and update key areas and key corridors for growth, preservation, and
infrastructure. Mr. Zambrano thanked those who helped spread the word, attended, and
participated in the PlanPHX road show series of events. Mr. Zambrano then
summarized results from both activities that the Village Planning Committees
participated in. Mr. Zambrano shared the timeline for the General Plan Update. Mr.
Zambrano concluded that staff recommends approval per the recommendation in the
staff report.

Questions from Committee:
None.

Public Comments:
None.


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 303
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23

Staff Response:
None.

MOTION – GPA-12-23:
Mr. Johnson motioned to recommend approval of GPA-12-23, per the staff
recommendation. Ms. French seconded the motion.

VOTE – GPA-12-23:
6-0; the motion to recommend approval of GPA-12-23 per the staff recommendation
passes with Committee members French, Johnson, Krieger, McCarty, McGill, and
Ricart in favor.

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 304
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23


Date of VPC Meeting January 17, 2024
Request Amend the General Plan to incorporate the 2025
General Plan Update
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 12-0


VPC DISCUSSION:

No speaker cards were received on this item.

Committee Member Perez arrived bringing the quorum to 12 members (10 needed for
a quorum)

STAFF PRESENTATION
Mr. Klimek, staff, provided a presentation reviewing the General Plan Update 2025
process, highlighting specific elements of the draft plan, the action items identified
moving forward, and the timeline. The item is on the agenda for a possible
recommendation.

QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE
Committee Member Alauria asked if “strengthen our local economy” applies mostly to
downtown. Mr. Klimek responded that the 2015 plan contained a specific core value
focused on strengthening the downtown district but that has now been shifted to
“create a network of vibrant cores, centers, and corridors.” Together, “strengthen our
local economy” and “create a network of vibrant cores, centers, and corridors” are
intended to acknowledge the role and importance of businesses of any scale and
community focal points both big and small. Committee Member Alauria thanked
Klimek for the response and noted the importance of commercial centers such as
Hatcher Road.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.

STAFF RESPONSE

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 305
North Mountain Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23

None.

FLOOR/PUBLIC DISCUSSION CLOSED:

MOTION:
Vice Chair Matthews moved to recommend approval of GPA-12-23 with the direction
that staff investigate opportunities for implementing key performance indicators to track
progress for all action items within the General Plan. Committee Member Barraza
seconded the motion.

DISCUSSION
None.

VOTE: 12-0-0, motion to recommend approval of GPA-12-23 with direction passes
with Committee Members Adams, Alauria, Krentz, McBride, Molfetta, O'Connor,
O'Hara, Perez, Sommacampagna, Whitney, Vice Chair Matthews, and Chair Fogelson
in favor; none in opposition; and none in abstention.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 306
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23


Date of VPC Meeting January 8, 2024
Request Amend the General Plan to incorporate the 2025
General Plan Update
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 12-0

VPC DISCUSSION:

Toby Gerst joined the meeting during this item, bringing the quorum to 12 members.

No members of the public registered to speak on this item.

Staff Presentation:
Adrian Zambrano, staff, provided a refresher of the City’s commitments for this
General Plan update to be strategic and focused, what the General Plan is, and why it is
needed. Mr. Zambrano displayed the updated framework of the 2025 General Plan. Mr.
Zambrano shared “Part IV: What We Are Going To Do Together Next” of the 2025
General Plan and key takeaways. Mr. Zambrano thanked those who helped spread the
word, attended, and participated in the PlanPHX road show series of events. Mr.
Zambrano shared the results from the “prioritizing our core values” chips activity
completed at the road show series of events, with the Village Planning Committees, and
with the Planning Commission. Mr. Zambrano then shard the results of what was heard
during the second activity, “prioritizing our actions”. Mr. Zambrano shared the timeline of
the General Plan update, noting that the Planning Commission would have two
hearings, and will take action in March. Mr. Zambrano concluded that staff recommends
approval per the staff recommendation in the staff report.

Questions from the Committee:
None.

Public Comments:
None.

Staff Response:
None.



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 307
Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23

MOTION – GPA-12-23:
Alan Sparks motioned to recommend approval of GPA-12-23, per the staff
recommendation. Jennifer Hall seconded the motion.

VOTE – GPA-12-23:
12-0; motion to recommend approval of GPA-12-23 per the staff recommendation
passes with Committee members Bustamante, DeMoss, Gerst, Hall, Knapp, Mazza,
Schmidt, Sparks, Ward, Wise, Mortensen, and Popovic in favor.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 308
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23



Date of VPC Meeting February 13, 2024
Request Amend the General Plan to incorporate the 2025
General Plan Update
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 4-0


VPC DISCUSSION:

No members of the public registered to speak on this item.

Staff Presentation:
Adrian Zambrano, staff, provided a refresher of the City’s commitment for this update
to be strategic and focused, noting that this update purposefully aligned with and
celebrated existing Citywide policies, plans, and initiatives as a unified policy
framework. Mr. Zambrano highlighted the two important changes to the General Plan.
Mr. Zambrano provided a refresher of Part IV of the General Plan, which outlines the
City’s commitment to keeping the process going and which summarizes short-term
actions and immediate next steps, including planning for place types to further identify,
evaluate, and update key areas and key corridors for growth, preservation, and
infrastructure. Mr. Zambrano thanked those who helped spread the word, attended, and
participated in the PlanPHX road show series of events. Mr. Zambrano then
summarized results from both activities that the Village Planning Committees
participated in. Mr. Zambrano shared the timeline for the General Plan Update. Mr.
Zambrano concluded that staff recommends approval per the recommendation in the
staff report.

Questions from Committee:
None.

Public Comments:
None.

Staff Response:
None.


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 309
Rio Vista Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23

MOTION – GPA-12-23:
Mr. Lawrence motioned to recommend approval of GPA-12-23, per the staff
recommendation. Mr. Perreira seconded the motion.

VOTE – GPA-12-23:
4-0; the motion to recommend approval of GPA-12-23 per the staff recommendation
passes with Committee members Holton, Perreira, Lawrence, and Sommacampagna in
favor.

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 310
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-12-23


Date of VPC Meeting January 9, 2024
Request Amend the General Plan to incorporate the 2025
General Plan Update
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 12-0-1


VPC DISCUSSION:

STAFF PRESENTATION

Samuel Rogers, staff, provided a presentation reviewing the General Plan Update
2025 process, highlighting specific elements of the draft plan, the action items
identified moving forward, the timeline, and explained that the item is at VPC for
recommendation.

QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE

Committee Member George Brooks asked how much the General Plan had changed
since the 2015 General Plan. Mr. Rogers explained that the 2015 General Plan was
used as a starting point for the 2025 General Plan Update.

Committee Member Shelly Smith asked about the implementation of General Plan
Policies and if a maintenance component will be implemented.. Mr. Rogers explained
that the General Plan’s policies are implemented through the seven strategic tools
discussed in the General Plan. Elias Valencia, staff, explained that the General Plan
is higher level policy document and maintenance is covered in documents like the
Landscape Ordinance.

Committee Member Busching stated that the General Plan discusses a bridge
across the Rio Salado at 3rd Street, discusses solar lighting to be installed on the
existing Rio Salado pathway, asked where the existing Rio Salado pathway is, and
asked when the 3rd Street Bridge will be constructed. Committee Member Emma
Viera explained that there is a Rio Salado pathway in the wash of river and extends
from 7th Avenue to Tempe. Sofia Mastikhina, with the Street Transportation
Department, explained that federal funding had been received for the 3rd Street




Page 311
bridge, explained that the project is in the design phase, and stated that she is not sure
when construction will start. Committee Member Kay Shepard asked if the bridge will
be for vehicles or pedestrians. Ms. Mastikhina explained that the 3rd Street bridge will
be for pedestrians and bicycles and stated that the Street Transportation also received
funding to construct protected bicycle pathways to connect to the bridge.

Chair Trent Marchuk stated that the Village Planning Committee (VPC) is voting on
General Plan update and framework and asked when the implementation component
will be started. Mr. Rogers explained that he would follow up on what the workplan will
look like going forward.

FLOOR/PUBLIC DISCUSSION CLOSED: MOTION, DISCUSSION, AND VOTE

MOTION
Committee Member Emma Viera made a motion to recommend approval GPA-12-23
per staff recommendation. Committee Member George Brooks seconded the motion.

VOTE
12-0-1, motion to recommend approval of GPA-12-23 per staff recommendation
passed with Committee members Aldama, Alvarez, Brooks, Busching, F. Daniels,
Holmerud, Jackson, Muhammad, Shepard, Greathouse, Smith, Greathouse, and
Marchuk favor and Committee Member Busching in abstention.

Committee Member Busching explained that she abstained because the General
Plan will come before her at least two or three more times.

STAFF COMMENTS:

None.




Page 312
ATTACHMENT D




ADDENDUM A

GPA-12-23
(PlanPHX 2025 Update)
March 3, 2024


Application: GPA-12-23

Applicant: Planning Commission

Requested Change: To update the General Plan to provide policy direction for
growth, redevelopment, conservation, and infrastructure
investment for the city.

Reason for Requested Change: As required by Arizona Revised Statutes.

Planning Commission Meeting March 7, 2024
Date:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, as shown in the recommended text in Exhibit A

SUMMARY
The Phoenix General Plan was last adopted by the Phoenix City Council and approved by voters
in 2015. In January of 2023, the Planning and Development Department (PDD), with the
leadership of the Phoenix City Council, initiated an effort to update the Phoenix General Plan
generally referred to as PlanPHX. The project's launch included the appointment of a PlanPHX
Leadership Committee by the City Council.

This General Plan update focused on the following:

1. Building on and refining the existing General Plan Framework.

2. Aligning General Plan’s goals and strategies with other City Council adopted initiatives.

3. Outlining what we will be working on to accomplish goals for the next 10 years.




Page 313
Addendum A Staff Report: GPA-12-23
March 3, 2024



COMMUNITY REVIEW AND FEEDBACK
Arizona Revised Statutes requires that a municipality provide a minimum of a 60-day review
period for the community to provide feedback on the draft General Plan. PDD circulated the
draft General Plan on December 18, 2023, and continued taking feedback through February 16,
2024. Outreach efforts included presentations at each of the Village Planning Committees
(VPC), cards, flyers, community meeting and events, meeting people where they were at, as
well as provide informational presentations to various groups, boards, and commissions along
the way so that everyone had opportunities to stay involved and provide input on their own
priorities via our online surveys.

Between October 14, 2023, and December 16, 2023, staff hosted seven roadshows throughout
the city to unveil the draft General Plan and obtain feedback, where more than 200 total
attendees provided feedback to staff.

Each of the Village Planning Committees had the opportunity to provide a recommendation on
the General Plan. Below is a summary of the recommendations.

Recommendation
Village Recommendation Vote
Date
Paradise Valley 1/8/24 Approved 12-0
Encanto 1/8/24 Approved 12-0
Camelback East 1/9/24 Approved 16-0
Desert View 1/9/24 Approved 8-0
Deer Valley 1/16/24 Approved 9-0
North Gateway 2/8/24 Approved 6-0
Central City 1/8/24 Approved with direction 13-0
Laveen 1/8/24 Approved with modifications 6-1
Rio Vista 2/13/24 Approved 4-0
South Mountain 1/9/24 Approved 12-0-1
Maryvale 1/10/24 Approved 7-2
Estrella 1/16/24 Approved 9-0
North Mountain 1/17/24 Approved with direction 12-0
Ahwatukee Foothills 1/22/24 Approved 7-1
Alhambra 2/27/24 Approved 13-0

As a result of the feedback received from the Village Planning Committees, community groups,
residents, and staff during the review period, staff has made several updates to the General
Plan as outlined in Exhibit B.




Page 314
Addendum A Staff Report: GPA-12-23
March 3, 2024



RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends approval of GPA-12-23 as modified in Exhibit B.


EXHIBIT

Exhibit A: Draft 2025 General Plan
Exhibit B: Proposed Changes




Page 315
Addendum A Staff Report: GPA-12-23
March 3, 2024



Exhibit B
Location in General Plan Proposed Changes
Pages 2-3 Add Letter from Mayor and PlanPHX 2025 Leadership Committee Chairman
Page 3 Update photos of Planning Commissioners and PlanPHX Leadership Committee
Page 3 Update Vice Mayor to reflect current Vice Mayor Debra Stark and former Vice
Mayor Yassamin Ansari
Page 6 Change the “phoenix today” “occupied housing units by jurisdiction area” from
659,880 to 579,876.
Page 6, Phoenix Today Add as follows: “Source: Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) - U.S. Census
Population, Occupied Housing Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates”
Units, Median Age, and
Housing Mix
Page 6, Population Growth Update as follows: “Source: Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) 2023
by Decade MAG Socioeconomic Projections - June 2023” with hyper link to resource.

Added source under Square Miles as follows: “City of Phoenix Planning and
Page 6
Development Department”
Updated Employment figure as follows “933,700 Jobs by Municipal Planning Area”
and “Added source as follows: “Source: Maricopa Association of Governments
Page 7
(MAG) 2023 MAG Socioeconomic Projections - June 2023” with hyper link to
resource.
Replaced Phoenix weather figures with the following “Average annual temperature
Page 7 High 87 degrees and Low 63 degrees Fahrenheit” and source as follows:
www.usclimatedata.com
Updated Sunshine figure to “Averages approximately 300 days of sunshine” and
Page 7
source as follows “en.wikipedia.org”
Replace “30,000” with “41,000” for Desert Parks and Preserves and added source as
Page 7 follows: “City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation Department,
https://www.phoenix.gov/parks”
Added source under the Phoenix 2025 Population, Housing Unit, Jobs, and
Population Growth by Decade as follows: “Source: Maricopa Association of
Page 8
Governments (MAG) 2023 MAG Socioeconomic Projections - June 2023” with hyper
link to resource.
Added source under the Projected Population Concentration, 2050 exhibit as
Page 9 follows: “Source: Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) 2023 MAG
Socioeconomic Projections - June 2023” with hyper link to resource.
After Page 9 Add updated spread modeled from the current 2015 general plan (pages 44-45) to
articulate continued regional coordination and collaboration.
Page 10, 2nd Paragraph Replace “this vision by providing” with “a vision that provides”
Page 10, Last Paragraph Replace “making” with “preserving, shaping and building”
Page 10, 3rd Paragraph, Last Remove “a privilege not often found elsewhere”
Sentence
Page 11, Last Paragraph Replace “Create” with “Create a Network of”




Page 316
Addendum A Staff Report: GPA-12-23
March 3, 2024



Page 12, 1st Paragraph, 2nd Replace “Planning Department” with Planning and Development Department” also
Column replace “Phoenix City Council” with “the PlanPHX 2025 Leadership Committee”,
also update “Appendix X” with “Appendix L” and make clickable link.
Page 15 and Parts III & IV Add a Youth icon to celebrate alignment between Youth recommendations and
General Plan Goals and Actions.
Page 17, 2nd Paragraph Replace “relationships across the city” with “connection across all city initiatives”.
Page 23, 1st Paragraph and Replace total miles of streets to 4,870 miles, 269 Major Arterials, 428 for Arterials,
Page 64 135 collectors, 473 Minor Collector, and 3,565 Locals
Page 26, 1st Paragraph, 1st Remove the word “true” and replace “any” with “of any”
Sentence
Page 26, 2nd Paragraph, 1st Replace “They” with “People”
Sentence
Page 28, 1st Paragraph, 2nd Replace “particularly in” with “particularly within”
Sentence
Page 28, Environment Add "access to natural spaces" and "increased preservation and restoration of
Column, Progress in the areas natural open space". Add “rates” after asthma.
of section
Page 31, 1st Paragraph, Last Replace “articulate input and the needs” with “articulate and address the needs”.
Sentence
Page 31, 5th Paragraph Replace “has noted” with “recognizes”.
Page 32 Add "environment, recreation, and natural open spaces" to the following
paragraph: Continuously creating new, high-quality opportunities in Phoenix for
workers and businesses. This includes our residents’ connectivity to education,
training, jobs, services, housing, arts, culture, environment, recreation, and natural
open spaces and transportation options.
Page 32 Add “Viability of” to 2nd bullet under Prosperity Challenges
Page 32, Mobility Paragraph Revise as follows: “Mobility is critical to humanity’s growth in the urban
environment. It is one of the major facilitators of human settlement and success.
Where an individual goes, if they drive a vehicle or instead walk, ride a bicycle or e-
scooter how they use to get there, and the resources they have access to have can
the potential to influence nearly every other element of their lives. Mobility and
equitable access to adequate infrastructure transportation and transit facilities
have become more widely regarded as civil rights, central to inclusion and critical to
individuals’ capacity to participate and prosper in the modern-day economy.”
Page 34 Replace “and has faced housing challenges like every city across the country” with
“but faces housing affordability challenges.”
Page 34 Remove “aspect of the” from second to last sentence in first paragraph
Page 34 Change Strategies to Address Homelessness “report” to “plan”.
Throughout Replace “HousingPHX Plan” with “Housing Phoenix Plan”
Page 35 Add the word “Plan” in the following sentence: In response to the current housing
challenges and the goals and recommendations from the Housing Phoenix Plan and
Strategies to Address Homelessness Plan the conversation around housing in
Phoenix must now look to answer the question about what can be done to provide
a robust mix of different housing types throughout the city.




Page 317
Addendum A Staff Report: GPA-12-23
March 3, 2024



Page 35, 2nd Paragraph Revise the following sentence as follows: The General Plan’s Cores, Centers and
Corridors and Place Types concepts will provide the policy framework for this next
evolution in the conversation around housing. and Several of the actions outlined in
Part IV of the General Plan call for continued updates to the Zoning Ordinance
related to facilitate a diversity of housing types to be dealth with a a variety of
scales, sensitive to unique and varied context, while utilizing the Urban Village
Model to ensure all communities and neighborhoods are part of the conversation
and part of the solution.
Page 35 Remove “e” from the word “suite” in the last sentence.
Page 36, Second Sentence Second sentence under “Housing” section, replace “proportion” with “portion”.
Page 36, 2nd Paragraph, 1st Replace “tap” with “drinking” and add “preserving and restoring natural spaces”
Sentence and “providing” to the following sentence: Equitable health in city planning includes
ensuring safe tap drinking water, ample street lighting, street shade, mitigating
excessive heat during summer months for at-risk residents, preserving and
restoring natural spaces and providing public parks that welcome residents and
offer opportunities for recreation and exercise.
Page 36, 2nd Paragraph, Last Add “in a way that does not create new financial burdens on economically
Sentence disadvantaged communities” to the following sentence: It includes ensuring that we
acknowledge the historical context of decisions on health and populations, and we
use data and community voice to empower and plan healthy communities in a way
that does not create new financial burdens on economically disadvantaged
communities.
Page 36, 4th Paragraph, 2nd Revise as follows: From ample tree canopy, and sidewalks to access to green spaces
Sentence and natural open spaces, every infrastructure investment is an opportunity to
improve public health and make the built environment safer and more inviting,
encouraging physical activity and time spent outdoors and in neighborhoods.
Page 36, 4th Paragraph, 2nd Replace “Another challenge would be that Phoenix has many areas that are
to Last Sentence considered primary care undeserved.” with “Many areas in Phoenix are considered
underserved regarding healthcare.”
Page 36, Last Paragraph Replace “30,000” with “41,000” under Phoenix Mountain and Sonoran Preserves
Header.
Page 36, 6th Paragraph Revise as follows: “According to the Road Safety Action Plan adopted by Phoenix
annually and an average of 2 crashes resulting in serious injury every single day, the
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has consistently ranked
Phoenix in the top 3 cities in the nation for overall traffic fatalities.”
Page 37, 2nd Paragraph, Last Revise as follows: “The trails along the canals have become one of Phoenix’s most
Sentence popular recreation destinations and their popularity will only continue to grow as
improvements to the canal trail system are made.”
Page 37, 3rd Paragraph, 1st Revise as follows: “Phoenix is home to f Five out of the ten Trauma Level 1 hospitals
Sentence in Arizona call Phoenix home, which are among the 15 major hospitals located in
the city.”
Page 37, Healthcare + Housing Remove “-Phoenix”
Section, 3rd Sentence
Page 37, Health Spotlight Update “community voice” with “the community’s voice”




Page 318
Addendum A Staff Report: GPA-12-23
March 3, 2024



Page 38, Heat and Health, 1st Add the word ‘more’ in front of intense heatwaves
Sentence
Page 40, 3rd Paragraph Revise as follows: Phoenix strives to be the most sustainable city in the world by
improving the quality of life for everyone and allowing nature to thrive. 2050
Sustainability Goals set long-term outcomes necessary to fulfill this vision and the
2021 Climate Action Plan (CAP) outlines the actions to achieving, 2050 goals along
with new ambitious climate goals. The CAP is part of how Phoenix is addressing the
impacts of climate change by putting the city on a path to reduce GHG emissions by
a minimum of 50 percent by 2030 and to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050.

All aspects of society including, in part, our health, our economy, and our food
systems are directly influenced by climate change. By using a place-based approach
for development, and including robust public involvement, equitable development
fosters collaborative problem solving; and makes a visible difference in
communities that are under served, under-resourced and overburdened.
Page 40, 5th Paragraph Revise as follows: Part of tackling sustainability is addressing environmental justice.
Certain populations can be disproportionately impacted by climate change can
include Black, Indigenous, and People of Color, lower income individuals, historically
underrepresented groups such as children and older adults, and those experiencing
multiple environmental burdens. In Phoenix, extreme heat and poor air quality
impact residents who may already be dealing with chronic health conditions, no or
inadequate healthcare, or a lack of clear and reliable information and resources.

Phoenix makes addressing environmental justice a priority. Environmental Justice
concerns include such things as fair and just access to environmental resources,
protection from environmental hazards and the ability to participate in
environmental decision making.
Page 40, 1st Paragraph under Replace as follows: Environmental threats for Phoenix include extreme heat, more
“Environmental Challenges” intense wildfires, increased flooding risk and vector borne disease. Rapid
urbanization, which can strain basic infrastructure, coupled with more frequent and
extreme weather events linked to global climate change is exacerbating the impact
of environmental threats.
Page 40, 2nd Paragraph under Revise as follows: Poor air quality impacts every resident in the city of Phoenix. The
“Environmental Challenges federal Clean Air Act (CAA) requires Arizona to create a state implementation plan
(SIP) aimed at meeting National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) that
include the following six criteria pollutants: carbon monoxide, ozone, particulate
matter with a diameter smaller than 10 micrometers (PM-10) and with a diameter
smaller than 2.5 micrometers (PM-2.5), lead, nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide.
These air quality standards must be met within the Maricopa Nonattainment Area,
which includes the city of Phoenix. Of course, air is not contained by city limits so
actions directed at improving air quality must be considered at a regional level. In
2021, Phoenix became a Signatory City of the C40 Clean Air Cities Declaration. As a
C40 City, Phoenix meets the World Health Organization (WHO) air quality standards
for nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide and will work toward meeting the standards
for particulate matter and ozone. This will be done by including relevant top
pollution-reducing actions into the plan, which includes expanding public transit,




Page 319
Addendum A Staff Report: GPA-12-23
March 3, 2024



increasing active transport options, modeling air pollution reduction as a result of
actions, and monitoring air quality. The greater Phoenix area is currently designated
as Moderate Non-attainment for ozone, and likely to be redesignated to Serious
Non-attainment in 2024. The area also is designated as Serious Non-attainment for
PM-10 (dust) and is experiencing increasing levels for PM-2.5 (soot) that could
potentially result in the region’s status changed to Non-attainment for PM-2.5. As
the classification becomes more severe, the Clean Air Act requirements become
more stringent and costly and impact public health.
Page 41, 6th Bullet Replace “Village Cores and Centers” with “Village Cores, Centers and Corridors”
Page 41, 1st and 2nd Revise as follows: Implement the Phoenix Climate Action Plan. Phoenix has
Paragraphs under accomplished many initiatives, programs, and projects that have led to climate
“Environment Opportunities” pollution reductions and provided social, economic and environmental benefits.
Page 43, Adaptation to Replace "This declaration will heighten awareness…." with "This declaration
Change, 3rd Column heightened awareness…"
Page 43, Adaptation to Replace sentence as follows "In addition, the city is pursuing new water supplies by
Change, 3rd Column recycling wastewater through Advanced Water Purification." with "In addition, the
city is pursuing new water supplies, such as the possibility of recycling wastewater
through Advanced Water Purification."
Page 43 Update “Adaptation to Change” with “Adapting to Change”
Between Pages 61-62 Add new spread for Tech Corridors with the following language “As Phoenix
has continued to establish itself as a leader in the technology sector, locations like
the Loop 202 Corridor in the Laveen and Estrella villages and Interstate 17 Corridor
in the Deer Valley and North Gateway villages are quickly becoming destinations for
investments in technology sectors”.

“Phoenix's Technology Corridors will be an integral part of the Cores,
Centers and Corridors exercise outlined in the Identifying and Prioritizing Key
Corridors section in Part IV of this update. Defined boundaries for each of the
corridors will be identified followed by land use, zoning and infrastructure analysis
to determine what each of the corridors needs to continue to attract investment.”
Page 64 Add the following sentence as its own subsection: “Safe and convenient crossings
for people walking and biking are part of reconnecting the street grid for everyone
in Phoenix. In high activity areas and near transit, street crossings should be more
frequent to connect to local destinations and support street safety.”
Page 66, Safe Systems for Safe Add “every day” to the following sentence "On average in the City of Phoenix there
Roads and Streets, 1st are 83 automobile collisions every day.”
Sentence
Page 69, Realizing Sense of Revise as follows: A challenge facing Phoenix is one of identity due to its short time
Place, 1st Sentence being a city, its vast land area and its explosive, rather than incremental, population
growth.
Page 72, Resiliency, Last Replace sentence as follows "Green stormwater infrastructure improves irrigation
Paragraph efficiency and lessens pollutants"….. with "Green stormwater infrastructure (GSI)
improves irrigation efficiency, reduces pollutants, and offers many other benefits."
Page 72 Remove “lush” from the following sentence “Planting trees, constructing lush open
spaces and using heat-resisting building materials mitigate rising outdoor
temperatures.”




Page 320
Addendum A Staff Report: GPA-12-23
March 3, 2024



Page 75, 1st Bullet under E.4 Replace as follows: “A minimum of 30 percent of housing units are dedicated for
long-term affordability for low to moderate income households (up to 80% of the
area median income for the Phoenix metro area), as approved by the Housing
Department.”
Page 76 Remove “lushly” from the following sentence: "A connected oasis approach to open
space planning that links together a network of lushly landscaped streets, canals,
desert preserves and parks."
Page 77, Policy F.7 Revise as follows: “Support the integration of Green Stormwater Infrastructure
(GSI) management practices . . .”
Page 85, Rivers, Washes & Add "and buffer" after preserve
Waterways
Page 85 Update Rivers, Washes, and Waterways.... In the 2025 plan, suggest updating this
goal to preserving natural washes (not just those coming from desert preserves)
and promote access, views, and trails along the rivers, washes, and waterways
(rather than promoting access to preserves, which really belongs in a separate
section, not in the washes section). These washes provide many benefits, including
connectivity corridors for humans and wildlife, recreation such as birdwatching, and
safe movement of water flows through the urban area. Also recommend adding a
goal regarding preserving and restoring the Salt River through Phoenix and
improving access, views, and trail connectivity along that corridor.
Page 89, Fairness, 1st Replace sentence as follows: “Maintaining checks and balances to uphold an
Sentence equitable system is important when asking the development community to
contribute to infrastructure financing.”
Page 91, 2nd Column, 2nd Add as follows: Land Use: Discourage new mining operations adjacent to or in close
Paragraph proximity to existing residential development, schools or existing or planned city
recreation areas or open space areas.
Page 97 Figure: Some key City initiatives that are left out and would provide value in the
context of the General Plan content are: the Mayor's Monarch Pledge and the
Montreal Biodiversity Pledge (both of which the city has joined and departments
have committed to supporting).
Page 100, 1st Paragraph Revise as follows: Residents believe that a network of vibrant Cores, Centers, and
Corridors will serve to provide our city with variety uniqueness across our 15 Urban
Villages, by providing access and opportunities for significant cultural,
entertainment and employment amenities that to benefits all Phoenicians, and
Arizona as a whole. In addition, A network of Vibrant Cores, Centers and Corridors
will also contributes to Arizona’s ability to both compete and collaborate regionally
and globally for growing economic development opportunities at various scales and
intensities across villages and the throughout our city.
Page 100, 2nd Paragraph, 1st Replace sentence as follows: “Phoenix residents, businesses, and visitors within the
Sentence Cores, Centers, and Corridors and surrounding neighborhoods are proud...”
Page 100, 5th Paragraph Create a new paragraph with “Opportunity sites...”
Page 101 Update photo description from “Encanto Village Core / Midtown Transit Oriented
District” to “Central City Core / Downtown Phoenix in the foreground; Encanto
Village Core / Midtown Transit Oriented District in the background”
Page 104 Update photo with image of ASU Downtown Phoenix Campus.
Pages 105-107 Replaced “DTPHX” with “Downtown Phoenix” throughout.




Page 321
Addendum A Staff Report: GPA-12-23
March 3, 2024



Page 105 Update last bullet on the page from “In 1.7 square miles of DTPHX there are 7
public parks, including 32- acre Hance Park.” to “In 1.7 square miles of DTPHX there
are 7 public parks, including the 32-acre newly revitalized Hance Park with more
improvements planned.”
Page 105, 2nd Bullet Revise as follows: “Over the past two decades, nearly 12,000 residential housing
units have been added in DTPHX and another 3,000 are under construction.
Between 2020-2022, 34% of this downtown housing has delivered.”
Page 106 Update the fifth bullet under “Policies” by replacing “should” with “will”
Page 107, 2nd Bullet Replace “Could” with “May” and remove parentheses.
Page 107 Remove “Starting in 2024”
Page 108 Remove hyperlink/underlined format from the following: Metrics - #of Housing
Units within TOCs / # of Jobs within TOCs.
Page 110 Update the number “2” to “two”
Pages 110 + 195 Change “City of Phoenix Office of Arts and Culture” to “City of Phoenix Department
of Arts and Culture”
Page 112, 1st Paragraph Replace as follows: “Significant amount of land is available in small vacant parcels
and larger underutilized parcels that could be developed and redeveloped within
several of our centrally located villages.”
Page 116, 1st-3rd Sentences Replace as follows: “Phoenix’s future vibrancy relies on embracing the next
evolution of growth that also enhances the city’s sustainability and environmental
health. Developing healthy neighborhoods that support for safe walking, biking, and
micromobility is imperative. New technologies and automated processes can
optimize access while supporting local productivity.”

Also delete the words “over time” in the Goal statement.
Page 117 Update spotlight descriptive text to include a reference and hyperlink to
https://www.phoenix.gov/ADU
Page 119, 1st Paragraph Revise as follows: “Phoenix’s growing population and infrastructure demands will
be met with new and evolving responses, resources and operational approaches”.
Update the GOAL by removing the words “over time”.
Page 120, 1st Paragraph Revise as follows: “Phoenix is growing as a national and international destination
and creating abundant housing options to meet these needs are a priority.”
Page 120 Update Goal language "scale” and “intensity” to read as plural “scales” and
“intensities”
Page 124, 1st Paragraph, 1st Revise as follows: “With almost 1.7 million residents and more than 529 square
Sentence miles, the city of Phoenix has many opportunities for growth.” Remove the word
“in” from the Goal language.
Page 124, 1st Paragraph, Last Revise as follows: “Development and redevelopment of vacant and underutilized
Sentence properties should consider existing and surrounding development character as well
as adjacent jurisdictions. Focusing within urbanized areas reduces the cost of
managing growth, by focusing new development in areas where the infrastructure
has already been developed.”
Page 125 Update to spotlight narrative to spell out what “Taiwan Semiconductor
Manufacturing Company (TSMC)”.
Page 126 Update the last sentence in the first paragraph from “But we are changing,
evolving, and rethinking mobility, access and experience of places as well as




Page 322
Addendum A Staff Report: GPA-12-23
March 3, 2024



infrastructure needs to get us there” to “But we are changing, evolving, and
rethinking mobility, and how we access and experience places including the
infrastructure needed to get us there”
Page 130-133 Update language throughout from “Rio Salado Park” to “Rio Salado Habitat
Restoration”
Page 131, 1st Paragraph Revise as follows: “Rio Salado is the central component of the Rio Reimagined
vision, as rivers are an integral part of life in a desert city. The Regional Rio
Reimagined objectives are to connect communities, restore and revitalize healthy
rivers, and develop economic sustainability. Rio Reimagined Phoenix focuses on the
Rio Salado (Salt River) corridor, encompassing Rio Salado and properties beyond its
banks. Phoenix’s goal for Rio Reimagined is to promote the 20-mile Rio Salado
corridor as a local and regional destination that attracts positive investment for the
benefit of river, nature, wildlife and supportive ecological systems as well as
existing and future businesses, residents, and visitors.”
Page 132 Add additional policy as follows: “Support partnerships towards conservation and
preservation of open space areas, conservation and preservation of wetland and
riparian areas, prioritizing wildlife and habitat connectivity, wildlife related
recreation opportunities, and working with to identify and maintain wildlife
corridors.”
Page 133, Spotlight Revise as follows: "… with its connection to the trails within the Rio Salado Habitat
Descriptive Text Restoration Area."
Page 134, Spotlight Revise as follows: “The opening date was January 27, 2024”
Descriptive Text, Last
Sentence
Page 141 Update spotlight descriptive text to spell out “High Intensity Activated crossWalK
(HAWK)”
Page 142 Update spotlight descriptive text by replacing “In fall 2023, Phoenix plans to
increase...” to “In fall 2023, Phoenix increased...” and “Currently” to “As of 2024”
Page 143 Update Goal statement to include the word “Continue” at the beginning. ..
Pages 144-145 Update the Parks Facilities Map 2023 (Appendix G) with a new Parks Facilities Map
2024.
Page 147 Update goal/section title from “Canals & Trails” to “Canal Trails”
Page 150, 1st Sentence Revise as follows: “Phoenicians have fewer barriers to enjoying library materials and
access to technology not more than ever.”
Page 152, End of the 4th Add the following: “In 2022, state resident and nonresidents spent $9.8 billion on
Paragraph fishing, hunting, watchable wildlife and other outdoor related recreation in Arizona
(USFWS 2022) supporting 18,220 jobs statewide.”
Page 158, Policies Add new policy language as follows:
• Continue to support the investment and growth of Advanced Air Mobility
(AAM) and other emerging and transformative technologies to improve the
accessibility and robustness of the City’s transportation systems. Leverage and
market Advanced Air Mobility and other unique aviation development
opportunities associated with vacant land at Deer Valley Airport.
• Align infrastructure investment serving the airport system with emerging and
forecast aviation needs and technology. Ensure new forms of city infrastructure




Page 323
Addendum A Staff Report: GPA-12-23
March 3, 2024



and services (eg, new cellular broadband, municipal drone usage and new
facilities for advanced air mobility) are compatible with airport operations.
Page 157, Last Paragraph Update as follows: “The Greater Phoenix Economic Council (GPEC) released a report
in 2023 highlighting how far Phoenix and the other cities in the Valley have come to
support the growth of the technology sector. Greater-Phoenix-TechStory-2023.pdf
(gpec.org)” Also include a clickable hyperlink to the referenced report.
Page 168 Update the Phoenix Airport System spotlight economic impact statistics as follows:
“In 2022, the Phoenix Airport System (PHX, DVT and GYR) total regional impact
(direct, indirect, and induced) was $44 billion dollars, with direct employment
adding up to 140,546 jobs, and airline visitor (domestic and international) spending
of $7 billion. Total tax revenues (federal, state, and local) exceeded $6 billion. The
Airport System achieves all this through focusing on customer needs, valuing
diversity and partnerships, and maintaining facilities that are sustainable and loved
by the flying public.”
Page 170 Add “, and other eco-tourism supporting infrastructure” to the end of the last
sentence.
174 & Throughout Update square miles of the city to read as 529 square miles.
183 & Throughout Update font format and effects to make clear and legible.
Page 184 Update the spelling in the title to correctly spell “Precinct” and update the spotlight
descriptions first sentence to include the words “is located” after the word
“Precinct”
Pages 185-186 & Throughout Update resource in bulleted list from “Housing Consolidated Plan” to “NSD
Consolidated Plan”
Page 185 Update the second sentence from “Residents want to work in concert with all
departments to improve and enact...” to “Residents and the city work together to
improve and enact...”
Page 190 Update descriptive language to read “co-locating with non-residential uses” instead
of “with employment opportunities”
Page 197 Add a sentence at the end as follows “Ecotourism is a large economic driver for the
city as it is the most beautiful and diverse desert in the world.”
Page 197, Last Sentence Revise as follows: “Open spaces can also serve as opportunities for preserving
native plants, incorporating water harvesting and green stormwater infrastructure
features like bioswales, all while further contributing to the city’s overall
sustainability, biodiversity, and well-being.”
Page 202, Project Spotlight Revise as follows: “approximately 1.7 million customers” and add a period at the
end of the last sentence.
Page 203, 1st Paragraph, Last Remove “Green Stormwater Infrastructure” and replace with “GSI” and change
Sentence “permeable pavement” to “porous pavers”.
Page 203 Update the following sentence from "Proper stormwater management through
green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) reduce flooding and protect surface waters
for a healthier community" to "Proper stormwater management through green
stormwater infrastructure (GSI) reduce flooding, protect surface waters, and can
help reduce reliance on potable water irrigation for a healthier community"
Page 203, Last Paragraph Move the following sentence to the end of the paragraph: “These features are also
sometimes referred to as low impact development (LID)."




Page 324
Addendum A Staff Report: GPA-12-23
March 3, 2024



Page 204 Add a new policy as follows: 4. Promote and support GSI elements as an approach
to enhance wildlife habitat, natural washes, and rivers, sustain native vegetation
and water preservation towards achieving climate resiliency.
Page 204, Policy 2 Change “types” to “elements”. Encourage and promote planning and design of
Green Stormwater Infrastructure types elements in early phases of projects.
Page 204 Update the “Protects Water Quality” Section as follows: "GSI help capture the first
flush flows that carry the heaviest pollution that otherwise rush to the city's
waterways during a downpour. Instead, water captured by GSI gets slowly filtered
and absorbed into the water table."
Page 204 Update language under “Localized Flood Mitigation” section as follows: “By
capturing and infiltrating water close to where it falls, it reduces the overload on
the stormwater sewer system during and after a rainstorm, reducing flood risk from
overloaded stormwater pipes. GSI can also help by capturing and infiltrating water
where no stormwater sewer system is available.”
Page 204 Update language under “Curb Opening” to include parking lots as follow "…can be
retrofitted into existing roadways or parking lot medians…"
Page 205 Update title to include “Rain Gardens” also updated descriptive language from this
“The Phoenix Zoo in Papago Park completed a redesign of its parking lot in 2022.
The parking area was designed to protect the natural drainage function of the
washes, and installed curb cuts for all landscaping and trees to be sustained by with
stormwater and used native plants and trees.” to this “The Phoenix Zoo in Papago
Park completed a design of its parking lot in 2022. The parking area was designed to
protect the natural drainage function of the washes and capture runoff from the
parking lot and installed curb cuts for all landscaping and trees to be sustained by
with stormwater and used native plants and trees.”
Throughout Adjust placement of the “Click here to return to the Table of Contents” box to avoid
blocking substantive material on the page.
Page 207, First Sentence Replace the word “innovative” with “resident-driven”
Page 208 Update to include “, ecological process” after the words “environmental
preservation”
Page 208 Add Mayor’s Monarch Pledge and Montreal Biodiversity Pledge under the related
policy initiatives and resources list with hyperlink.
Page 210 Update spotlight title to “Phoenix Mayor’s Monarch Pledge” and updated language
to include the Desert Botanical Garden as a key partner.
Page 210 Update photo to celebrate the Mayor’s Monarch Pledge and new spotlight title.
Pages 210-211 Update Goal Language from “Celebrate and protect our Rivers, Washes and
Waterways.” to “Celebrate and protect and restore our Rivers, Washes and
Waterways in their natural state and explore potential to accommodate wildlife
movement and passive recreation corridors where possible.”
Page 211 Add Tres Rios Website to the Related Policy Initiatives and Resources list.
Page 212 Remove “Brownfields are a liability for the city because they pose a risk to public
health, create barriers in maximizing existing infrastructure and have unknown
environmental conditions.”
Page 232 Change “Development” to “Develop”
Page 233 Update the 2nd Action item to include “trails along washes” as follows: Continue to
partner with adjacent property owners and pursue grants that enhance multi-




Page 325
Addendum A Staff Report: GPA-12-23
March 3, 2024



modal transportation infrastructure and amenities along designated corridors like
our canals, trails along washes, mass transit corridors and the Rio Salado.
Page 233 Add new action: Support the Parks and Recreation Department in an update of the
Parks and Recreation Master Plan.
Page 234 Add new action: Partner with downtown stakeholders on an update of the
Downtown Strategic Plan.
Page 234 Second “Codes” Action, include “and other codes and ordinances” after “Zoning
Ordinance”
Page 234 Add new action: Develop and implement a process improvement program to
support enhanced customer service for customers within the Planning and
Development Department's plan review, permit, and inspection processes.
Page 235 Update Partnerships Action to read as “to promote a diversity of housing options
and variety of income levels in appropriate locations”
Page 236 Add “build the Sustainable Desert City” logo to top of page
Page 236 Update the following Action “Update the Tree and Shade Master Plan” with
“Support the Office of Heat Response and Mitigation with an update to the Tree
and Shade Master Plan”
Page 236 Update the following Action “Update the Climate Action Plan” with “Support the
Office of Environmental Programs with an update to the Climate Action Plan”
Part IV after page 236 Add additional “IPlanPHX” page modeled off the City Council Adopted 2015 General
Plan Page 186.
Page 237 Update image to align more with “Sustainability”
Page 238 Remove “Michelle Pierson, Deputy Economic”
Page 238 Change “Office of Arts and Culture” to “Arts and Culture” and not “Office of Arts
and Culture” and Mitch Menchaca as Director, and Carrie Brown as Deputy
Director.
Page 238 Update Mitch Menchaca as Director and Carrie Brown as Deputy Director.
Page 238 Replace “Balluf” with “Balluff”
Appendix H: Glossary of Terms Add General Plan Land Use definitions as adopted in GPA-1-08.
Appendix H: Glossary of Terms Add definition to the glossary of terms: Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) ADUs,
often referred to as guest houses, casitas, or granny flats are separate, self-
continued living areas that are either fully detached structures or attached to an
existing home, with its own external entrance. An ADU usually contains all of the
amenities to operate as a fully independent, operational dwelling, including a
kitchen, bathroom, living area and sleeping quarters.
Appendix H: Glossary of Terms Add definition to the glossary of terms: Green Stormwater Infrastructure, or GSI
means infrastructure constructed with a range of measures that use plant or soil
systems, permeable pavement or other permeable surfaces or substrates,
stormwater harvest and reuse, or landscaping to store, infiltrate, or
evapotranspirate stormwater and reduce flows to the public storm drain system or
to surface waters. These features are also sometimes referred to as low impact
development (LID). They are generally small in size to capture water where it falls
for multiple co-benefits.
Appendix H: Glossary of Terms Add definition to the glossary of terms: High-capacity transit (HCT), such as light
rail, streetcar, or bus rapid transit, is designed to efficiently move large volumes of




Page 326
Addendum A Staff Report: GPA-12-23
March 3, 2024



people by operating on dedicated tracks or right-of-way. HCT vehicles offer a
balance between speed, capacity, and accessibility by allowing faster and more
frequent service, fewer stops, and the ability to carry more people than local
service transit.
Appendix H: Glossary of Terms Add definition to the glossary of terms: Missing Middle Housing is a range of house-
scale buildings with multiple units - compatible in scale and form with detached
single-family homes – located in a walkable neighborhood. Missing middle housing
refers to housing that falls between single-family homes and mid-rise apartments.
Examples include duplexes, triplexes, townhomes, small apartments, courtyard
clusters, bungalows, fourplexes and live work.
Appendices Add Place Type Matrix
Throughout Removed/replaced/updated references, footnotes, and sources and renumbered
pages accordingly throughout.




Page 327
ATTACHMENT E


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
March 7, 2024

ITEM NO: 6
DISTRICT NO.: Citywide
SUBJECT:

Application #: GPA-12-23
Location: Citywide
Request: Request to amend the General Plan to incorporate the 2025 General Plan
Update
Proposal: 2025 General Plan Update
Applicant: City of Phoenix, Planning Commission
Representative: City of Phoenix, Planning and Development Department

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Ahwatukee Foothills 1/22/2024 Approved. Vote: 7-1.
Alhambra 2/27/2024 Approved. Vote: 13-0.
Camelback East 1/9/2024 Approved. Vote: 16-0.
Central City 1/8/2024 Approved with direction. Vote: 13-0.
Deer Valley 1/16/2024 Approved. Vote: 9-0.
Desert View 1/9/2024 Approved. Vote: 8-0.
Encanto 1/8/2024 Approved. Vote: 12-0.
Estrella 1/16/2024 Approved. Vote: 9-0.
Laveen 1/8/2024 Approved with modifications. Vote: 6-1.
Maryvale 1/10/2024 Approved. Vote: 7-2.
North Gateway 2/8/2024 Approved. Vote: 6-0.
North Mountain 1/17/2024 Approved with direction. Vote: 12-0.
Paradise Valley 1/8/2024 Approved. Vote: 12-0.
Rio Vista 2/13/2024 Approved. Vote: 4-0.
South Mountain 1/9/2024 Approved. Vote: 12-0-1.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Addendum A Staff Report.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve GPA-12-23, per the
Addendum A Staff Report.

Maker: Matthews
Second: Jaramillo
Vote: 8-0
Absent: Busching
Opposition Present: No

Findings:

1. Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) require every city in Arizona to prepare and maintain a
long-range general plan that provides a vision and policies for the growth and

Page 328
development of the city. The Phoenix General Plan was last adopted by the Phoenix
Development Department, with the leadership of the Phoenix City Council, initiated an
effort to update the Phoenix General Plan generally referred to as PlanPHX.

2. This General Plan update focuses on building on and refining the existing General Plan
framework, aligning the General Plan’s goals and strategies with other City Council
adopted initiatives, and outlining what we will be working on to accomplish goals for the
next 10 years.

Proposed Changes:

Location in
Proposed Changes
General Plan
Pages 2-3 Add Letter from Mayor and PlanPHX 2025 Leadership Committee
Chairman
Page 3 Update photos of Planning Commissioners and PlanPHX
Leadership Committee
Page 3 Update Vice Mayor to reflect current Vice Mayor Debra Stark and
former Vice Mayor Yassamin Ansari
Page 6 Change the “phoenix today” “occupied housing units by jurisdiction
area” from 659,880 to 579,876.
Page 6, Phoenix Today Add as follows: “Source: Maricopa Association of Governments
Population, Occupied (MAG) - U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community
Housing Units, Median Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates”
Age, and Housing Mix
Page 6, Population Update as follows: “Source: Maricopa Association of Governments
Growth by Decade (MAG) 2023 MAG Socioeconomic Projections - June 2023” with
hyper link to resource.
Added source under Square Miles as follows: “City of Phoenix
Page 6
Planning and Development Department”
Updated Employment figure as follows “933,700 Jobs by Municipal
Planning Area” and “Added source as follows: “Source: Maricopa
Page 7
Association of Governments (MAG) 2023 MAG Socioeconomic
Projections - June 2023” with hyper link to resource.
Replaced Phoenix weather figures with the following “Average
Page 7 annual temperature High 87 degrees and Low 63 degrees
Fahrenheit” and source as follows: www.usclimatedata.com
Updated Sunshine figure to “Averages approximately 300 days of
Page 7
sunshine” and source as follows “en.wikipedia.org”
Replace “30,000” with “41,000” for Desert Parks and Preserves and
Page 7 added source as follows: “City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation
Department, https://www.phoenix.gov/parks”
Added source under the Phoenix 2025 Population, Housing Unit,
Jobs, and Population Growth by Decade as follows: “Source:
Page 8 Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) 2023 MAG
Socioeconomic Projections - June 2023” with hyper link to
resource.
Added source under the Projected Population Concentration, 2050
exhibit as follows: “Source: Maricopa Association of Governments
Page 9
(MAG) 2023 MAG Socioeconomic Projections - June 2023” with
hyper link to resource.


Page 329
After Page 9 Add updated spread modeled from the current 2015 general plan
(pages 44-45) to articulate continued regional coordination and
collaboration.
Page 10, 2nd
Replace “this vision by providing” with “a vision that provides”
Paragraph
Page 10, Last
Replace “making” with “preserving, shaping and building”
Paragraph
Page 10, 3rd Remove “a privilege not often found elsewhere”
Paragraph, Last
Sentence
Page 11, Last
Replace “Create” with “Create a Network of”
Paragraph
Page 12, 1st Replace “Planning Department” with Planning and Development
Paragraph, 2nd Department” also replace “Phoenix City Council” with “the PlanPHX
Column 2025 Leadership Committee”, also update “Appendix X” with
“Appendix L” and make clickable link.
Page 15 and Parts III & Add a Youth icon to celebrate alignment between Youth
IV recommendations and General Plan Goals and Actions.
Page 17, 2nd Replace “relationships across the city” with “connection across all
Paragraph city initiatives”.
Page 23, 1st Replace total miles of streets to 4,870 miles, 269 Major Arterials,
Paragraph and Page 428 for Arterials, 135 collectors, 473 Minor Collector, and 3,565
64 Locals
Page 26, 1st Remove the word “true” and replace “any” with “of any”
Paragraph, 1st
Sentence
Page 26, 2nd Replace “They” with “People”
Paragraph, 1st
Sentence
Page 28, 1st Replace “particularly in” with “particularly within”
Paragraph, 2nd
Sentence
Page 28, Environment Add "access to natural spaces" and "increased preservation and
Column, Progress in restoration of natural open space". Add “rates” after asthma.
the areas of section
Page 31, 1st Replace “articulate input and the needs” with “articulate and
Paragraph, Last address the needs”.
Sentence
Page 31, 5th Replace “has noted” with “recognizes”.
Paragraph
Page 32 Add "environment, recreation, and natural open spaces" to the
following paragraph: Continuously creating new, high-quality
opportunities in Phoenix for workers and businesses. This includes
our residents’ connectivity to education, training, jobs, services,
housing, arts, culture, environment, recreation, and natural open
spaces and transportation options.
Page 32 Add “Viability of” to 2nd bullet under Prosperity Challenges
Page 32, Mobility Revise as follows: “Mobility is critical to humanity’s growth in the
Paragraph urban environment. It is one of the major facilitators of human
settlement and success. Where an individual goes, if they drive a
vehicle or instead walk, ride a bicycle or e-scooter how they use to
get there, and the resources they have access to have can the
potential to influence nearly every other element of their lives.

Page 330
Mobility and equitable access to adequate infrastructure
transportation and transit facilities have become more widely
regarded as civil rights, central to inclusion and critical to
individuals’ capacity to participate and prosper in the modern-day
economy.”
Page 34 Replace “and has faced housing challenges like every city across
the country” with “but faces housing affordability challenges.”
Page 34 Remove “aspect of the” from second to last sentence in first
paragraph
Page 34 Change Strategies to Address Homelessness “report” to “plan”.
Throughout Replace “HousingPHX Plan” with “Housing Phoenix Plan”
Page 35 Add the word “Plan” in the following sentence: In response to the
current housing challenges and the goals and recommendations
from the Housing Phoenix Plan and Strategies to Address
Homelessness Plan the conversation around housing in Phoenix
must now look to answer the question about what can be done to
provide a robust mix of different housing types throughout the city.
Page 35, 2nd Revise the following sentence as follows: The General Plan’s
Paragraph Cores, Centers and Corridors and Place Types concepts will
provide the policy framework for this next evolution in the
conversation around housing. and Several of the actions outlined in
Part IV of the General Plan call for continued updates to the Zoning
Ordinance related to facilitate a diversity of housing types to be
dealth with a a variety of scales, sensitive to unique and varied
context, while utilizing the Urban Village Model to ensure all
communities and neighborhoods are part of the conversation and
part of the solution.
Page 35 Remove “e” from the word “suite” in the last sentence.
Page 36, Second Second sentence under “Housing” section, replace “proportion” with
Sentence “portion”.
Page 36, 2nd Replace “tap” with “drinking” and add “preserving and restoring
Paragraph, 1st natural spaces” and “providing” to the following sentence: Equitable
Sentence health in city planning includes ensuring safe tap drinking water,
ample street lighting, street shade, mitigating excessive heat during
summer months for at-risk residents, preserving and restoring
natural spaces and providing public parks that welcome residents
and offer opportunities for recreation and exercise.
Page 36, 2nd Add “in a way that does not create new financial burdens on
Paragraph, Last economically disadvantaged communities” to the following
Sentence sentence: It includes ensuring that we acknowledge the historical
context of decisions on health and populations, and we use data
and community voice to empower and plan healthy communities in
a way that does not create new financial burdens on economically
disadvantaged communities.
Page 36, 4th Revise as follows: From ample tree canopy, and sidewalks to
Paragraph, 2nd access to green spaces and natural open spaces, every
Sentence infrastructure investment is an opportunity to improve public health
and make the built environment safer and more inviting,
encouraging physical activity and time spent outdoors and in
neighborhoods.




Page 331
Page 36, 4th Replace “Another challenge would be that Phoenix has many areas
Paragraph, 2nd to Last that are considered primary care undeserved.” with “Many areas in
Sentence Phoenix are considered underserved regarding healthcare.”

Page 36, Last Replace “30,000” with “41,000” under Phoenix Mountain and
Paragraph Sonoran Preserves Header.
Page 36, 6th Revise as follows: “According to the Road Safety Action Plan
Paragraph adopted by Phoenix City Council on September 7, 2022, Phoenix
has an average of over 30,000 crashes annually and an average of
2 crashes resulting in serious injury every single day, the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has consistently
ranked Phoenix in the top 3 cities in the nation for overall traffic
fatalities.”
Page 37, 2nd Revise as follows: “The trails along the canals have become one of
Paragraph, Last Phoenix’s most popular recreation destinations and their popularity
Sentence will only continue to grow as improvements to the canal trail system
are made.”
Page 37, 3rd Revise as follows: “Phoenix is home to f Five out of the ten Trauma
Paragraph, 1st Level 1 hospitals in Arizona call Phoenix home, which are among
Sentence the 15 major hospitals located in the city.”
Page 37, Healthcare + Remove “-Phoenix”
Housing Section, 3rd
Sentence
Page 37, Health Update “community voice” with “the community’s voice”
Spotlight
Page 38, Heat and Add the word ‘more’ in front of intense heatwaves
Health, 1st Sentence
Page 40, 3rd Revise as follows: Phoenix strives to be the most sustainable city in
Paragraph the world by improving the quality of life for everyone and allowing
nature to thrive. 2050 Sustainability Goals set long-term outcomes
necessary to fulfill this vision and the 2021 Climate Action Plan
(CAP) outlines the actions to achieving, 2050 goals along with new
ambitious climate goals. The CAP is part of how Phoenix is
addressing the impacts of climate change by putting the city on a
path to reduce GHG emissions by a minimum of 50 percent by
2030 and to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050.

All aspects of society including, in part, our health, our economy,
and our food systems are directly influenced by climate change. By
using a place-based approach for development, and including
robust public involvement, equitable development fosters
collaborative problem solving; and makes a visible difference in
communities that are under served, under-resourced and
overburdened.
Page 40, 5th Revise as follows: Part of tackling sustainability is addressing
Paragraph environmental justice. Certain populations can be disproportionately
impacted by climate change can include Black, Indigenous, and
People of Color, lower income individuals, historically
underrepresented groups such as children and older adults, and
those experiencing multiple environmental burdens. In Phoenix,
extreme heat and poor air quality impact residents who may already
be dealing with chronic health conditions, no or inadequate


Page 332
healthcare, or a lack of clear and reliable information and
resources.

Phoenix makes addressing environmental justice a priority.
Environmental Justice concerns include such things as fair and just
access to environmental resources, protection from environmental
hazards and the ability to participate in environmental decision
making.
Page 40, 1st Replace as follows: Environmental threats for Phoenix include
Paragraph under extreme heat, more intense wildfires, increased flooding risk and
“Environmental vector borne disease. Rapid urbanization, which can strain basic
Challenges” infrastructure, coupled with more frequent and extreme weather
events linked to global climate change is exacerbating the impact of
environmental threats.
Page 40, 2nd Revise as follows: Poor air quality impacts every resident in the city
Paragraph under of Phoenix. The federal Clean Air Act (CAA) requires Arizona to
“Environmental create a state implementation plan (SIP) aimed at meeting National
Challenges” Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) that include the following
six criteria pollutants: carbon monoxide, ozone, particulate matter
with a diameter smaller than 10 micrometers (PM-10) and with a
diameter smaller than 2.5 micrometers (PM-2.5), lead, nitrogen
dioxide, and sulfur dioxide. These air quality standards must be
met within the Maricopa Nonattainment Area, which includes the
city of Phoenix. Of course, air is not contained by city limits so
actions directed at improving air quality must be considered at a
regional level. In 2021, Phoenix became a Signatory City of the C40
Clean Air Cities Declaration. As a C40 City, Phoenix meets the
World Health Organization (WHO) air quality standards for nitrogen
dioxide and sulfur dioxide and will work toward meeting the
standards for particulate matter and ozone. This will be done by
including relevant top pollution-reducing actions into the plan, which
includes expanding public transit, increasing active transport
options, modeling air pollution reduction as a result of actions, and
monitoring air quality. The greater Phoenix area is currently
designated as Moderate Non-attainment for ozone, and likely to be
redesignated to Serious Non-attainment in 2024. The area also is
designated as Serious Non-attainment for PM-10 (dust) and is
experiencing increasing levels for PM-2.5 (soot) that could
potentially result in the region’s status changed to Non-attainment
for PM-2.5. As the classification becomes more severe, the Clean
Air Act requirements become more stringent and costly and impact
public health.
Page 41, 6th Bullet Replace “Village Cores and Centers” with “Village Cores, Centers
and Corridors”
Page 41, 1st and 2nd Revise as follows: Implement the Phoenix Climate Action Plan.
Paragraphs under Phoenix has accomplished many initiatives, programs, and projects
“Environment that have led to climate pollution reductions and provided social,
Opportunities” economic and environmental benefits.
Page 43, Adaptation to Replace "This declaration will heighten awareness…." with "This
Change, 3rd Column declaration heightened awareness…"
Page 43, Adaptation to Replace sentence as follows "In addition, the city is pursuing new
Change, 3rd Column water supplies by recycling wastewater through Advanced Water
Purification." with "In addition, the city is pursuing new water

Page 333
supplies, such as the possibility of recycling wastewater through
Advanced Water Purification."
Page 43 Update “Adaptation to Change” with “Adapting to Change”
Between Pages 61-62 Add new spread for Tech Corridors with the following language “As
Phoenix
has continued to establish itself as a leader in the technology
sector, locations like the Loop 202 Corridor in the Laveen and
Estrella villages and Interstate 17 Corridor in the Deer Valley and
North Gateway villages are quickly becoming destinations for
investments in technology sectors”.

“Phoenix's Technology Corridors will be an integral part of the
Cores,
Centers and Corridors exercise outlined in the Identifying and
Prioritizing Key
Corridors section in Part IV of this update. Defined boundaries for
each of the corridors will be identified followed by land use, zoning
and infrastructure analysis to determine what each of the corridors
needs to continue to attract investment.”
Page 64 Add the following sentence as its own subsection: “Safe and
convenient crossings for people walking and biking are part of
reconnecting the street grid for everyone in Phoenix. In high activity
areas and near transit, street crossings should be more frequent to
connect to local destinations and support street safety.”
Page 66, Safe Systems Add “every day” to the following sentence "On average in the City of
for Safe Roads and Phoenix there are 83 automobile collisions every day.”
Streets, 1st Sentence
Page 69, Realizing Revise as follows: A challenge facing Phoenix is one of identity due
Sense of Place, 1st to its short time being a city, its vast land area and its explosive,
Sentence rather than incremental, population growth.
Page 72, Resiliency, Replace sentence as follows "Green stormwater infrastructure
Last Paragraph improves irrigation efficiency and lessens pollutants"….. with
"Green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) improves irrigation
efficiency, reduces pollutants, and offers many other benefits."
Page 72 Remove “lush” from the following sentence “Planting trees,
constructing lush open spaces and using heat-resisting building
materials mitigate rising outdoor temperatures.”
Page 75, 1st Bullet Replace as follows: “A minimum of 30 percent of housing units are
under E.4 dedicated for long-term affordability for low to moderate income
households (up to 80% of the area median income for the Phoenix
metro area), as approved by the Housing Department.”
Page 76 Remove “lushly” from the following sentence: "A connected oasis
approach to open space planning that links together a network of
lushly landscaped streets, canals, desert preserves and parks."
Page 77, Policy F.7 Revise as follows: “Support the integration of Green Stormwater
Infrastructure (GSI) management practices . . .”
Page 85, Rivers, Add "and buffer" after preserve
Washes & Waterways
Page 85 Update Rivers, Washes, and Waterways.... In the 2025 plan,
suggest updating this goal to preserving natural washes (not just
those coming from desert preserves) and promote access, views,
and trails along the rivers, washes, and waterways (rather than
promoting access to preserves, which really belongs in a separate

Page 334
section, not in the washes section). These washes provide many
benefits, including connectivity corridors for humans and wildlife,
recreation such as birdwatching, and safe movement of water flows
through the urban area. Also recommend adding a goal regarding
preserving and restoring the Salt River through Phoenix and
improving access, views, and trail connectivity along that corridor.
Page 89, Fairness, 1st Replace sentence as follows: “Maintaining checks and balances to
Sentence uphold an equitable system is important when asking the
development community to contribute to infrastructure financing.”
Page 91, 2nd Column, Add as follows: Land Use: Discourage new mining operations
2nd Paragraph adjacent to or in close proximity to existing residential development,
schools or existing or planned city recreation areas or open space
areas.
Page 97 Figure: Some key City initiatives that are left out and would provide
value in the context of the General Plan content are: the Mayor's
Monarch Pledge and the Montreal Biodiversity Pledge (both of
which the city has joined and departments have committed to
supporting).
Page 100, 1st Revise as follows: Residents believe that a network of vibrant
Paragraph Cores, Centers, and Corridors will serve to provide our city with
variety uniqueness across our 15 Urban Villages, by providing
access and opportunities for significant cultural, entertainment and
employment amenities that to benefits all Phoenicians, and Arizona
as a whole. In addition, A network of Vibrant Cores, Centers and
Corridors will also contributes to Arizona’s ability to both compete
and collaborate regionally and globally for growing economic
development opportunities at various scales and intensities across
villages and the throughout our city.
Page 100, 2nd Replace sentence as follows: “Phoenix residents, businesses, and
Paragraph, 1st visitors within the Cores, Centers, and Corridors and surrounding
Sentence neighborhoods are proud...”
Page 100, 5th Create a new paragraph with “Opportunity sites...”
Paragraph
Page 101 Update photo description from “Encanto Village Core / Midtown
Transit Oriented District” to “Central City Core / Downtown Phoenix
in the foreground; Encanto Village Core / Midtown Transit Oriented
District in the background”
Page 104 Update photo with image of ASU Downtown Phoenix Campus.
Pages 105-107 Replaced “DTPHX” with “Downtown Phoenix” throughout.
Page 105 Update last bullet on the page from “In 1.7 square miles of DTPHX
there are 7 public parks, including 32- acre Hance Park.” to “In 1.7
square miles of DTPHX there are 7 public parks, including the 32-
acre newly revitalized Hance Park with more improvements
planned.”
Page 105, 2nd Bullet Revise as follows: “Over the past two decades, nearly 12,000
residential housing units have been added in DTPHX and another
3,000 are under construction. Between 2020-2022, 34% of this
downtown housing has delivered.”
Page 106 Update the fifth bullet under “Policies” by replacing “should” with
“will”
Page 107, 2nd Bullet Replace “Could” with “May” and remove parentheses.
Page 107 Remove “Starting in 2024”

Page 335
Page 108 Remove hyperlink/underlined format from the following: Metrics -
#of Housing Units within TOCs / # of Jobs within TOCs.
Page 110 Update the number “2” to “two”
Pages 110 + 195 Change “City of Phoenix Office of Arts and Culture” to “City of
Phoenix Department of Arts and Culture”
Page 112, 1st Replace as follows: “Significant amount of land is available in small
Paragraph vacant parcels and larger underutilized parcels that could be
developed and redeveloped within several of our centrally located
villages.”
Page 116, 1st-3rd Replace as follows: “Phoenix’s future vibrancy relies on embracing
Sentences the next evolution of growth that also enhances the city’s
sustainability and environmental health. Developing healthy
neighborhoods that support for safe walking, biking, and micro
mobility is imperative. New technologies and automated processes
can optimize access while supporting local productivity.”

Also delete the words “over time” in the Goal statement.
Page 117 Update spotlight descriptive text to include a reference and
hyperlink to https://www.phoenix.gov/ADU
Page 119, 1st Revise as follows: “Phoenix’s growing population and infrastructure
Paragraph demands will be met with new and evolving responses, resources
and operational approaches”. Update the GOAL by removing the
words “over time”.
Page 120, 1st Revise as follows: “Phoenix is growing as a national and
Paragraph international destination and creating abundant housing options to
meet these needs are a priority.”
Page 120 Update Goal language "scale” and “intensity” to read as plural
“scales” and “intensities”
Page 124, 1st Revise as follows: “With almost 1.7 million residents and more than
Paragraph, 1st 529 square miles, the city of Phoenix has many opportunities for
Sentence growth.” Remove the word “in” from the Goal language.
Page 124, 1st Revise as follows: “Development and redevelopment of vacant and
Paragraph, Last underutilized properties should consider existing and surrounding
Sentence development character as well as adjacent jurisdictions. Focusing
within urbanized areas reduces the cost of managing growth, by
focusing new development in areas where the infrastructure has
already been developed.”
Page 125 Update to spotlight narrative to spell out what “Taiwan
Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)”.
Page 126 Update the last sentence in the first paragraph from “But we are
changing, evolving, and rethinking mobility, access and experience
of places as well as infrastructure needs to get us there” to “But we
are changing, evolving, and rethinking mobility, and how we access
and experience places including the infrastructure needed to get us
there”
Page 130-133 Update language throughout from “Rio Salado Park” to “Rio Salado
Habitat Restoration”
Page 131, 1st Revise as follows: “Rio Salado is the central component of the Rio
Paragraph Reimagined vision, as rivers are an integral part of life in a desert
city. The Regional Rio Reimagined objectives are to connect
communities, restore and revitalize healthy rivers, and develop
economic sustainability. Rio Reimagined Phoenix focuses on the
Rio Salado (Salt River) corridor, encompassing Rio Salado and

Page 336
properties beyond its banks. Phoenix’s goal for Rio Reimagined is
to promote the 20-mile Rio Salado corridor as a local and regional
destination that attracts positive investment for the benefit of river,
nature, wildlife, and supportive ecological systems as well as
existing and future businesses, residents, and visitors.”
Page 132 Add additional policy as follows: “Support partnerships towards
conservation and preservation of open space areas, conservation
and preservation of wetland and riparian areas, prioritizing wildlife
and habitat connectivity, wildlife related recreation opportunities,
and working with to identify and maintain wildlife corridors.”
Page 133, Spotlight Revise as follows: "… with its connection to the trails within the Rio
Descriptive Text Salado Habitat Restoration Area."
Page 134, Spotlight Revise as follows: “The opening date was January 27, 2024”
Descriptive Text, Last
Sentence
Page 141 Update spotlight descriptive text to spell out “High Intensity
Activated crossWalK (HAWK)”
Page 142 Update spotlight descriptive text by replacing “In fall 2023, Phoenix
plans to increase...” to “In fall 2023, Phoenix increased...” and
“Currently” to “As of 2024”
Page 143 Update Goal statement to include the word “Continue” at the
beginning. ..
Pages 144-145 Update the Parks Facilities Map 2023 (Appendix G) with a new
Parks Facilities Map 2024.
Page 147 Update goal/section title from “Canals & Trails” to “Canal Trails”
Page 150, 1st Revise as follows: “Phoenicians have fewer barriers to enjoying
Sentence library materials and access to technology not more than ever.”
Page 152, End of the Add the following: “In 2022, state resident and nonresidents spent
4th Paragraph $9.8 billion on fishing, hunting, watchable wildlife and other outdoor
related recreation in Arizona (USFWS 2022) supporting 18,220 jobs
statewide.”
Page 158, Policies Add new policy language as follows:
x Continue to support the investment and growth of Advanced Air
Mobility (AAM) and other emerging and transformative
technologies to improve the accessibility and robustness of the
City’s transportation systems. Leverage and market Advanced
Air Mobility and other unique aviation development opportunities
associated with vacant land at Deer Valley Airport.
x Align infrastructure investment serving the airport system with
emerging and forecast aviation needs and technology. Ensure
new forms of city infrastructure and services (eg, new cellular
broadband, municipal drone usage and new facilities for
advanced air mobility) are compatible with airport operations.
Page 157, Last Update as follows: “The Greater Phoenix Economic Council
Paragraph (GPEC) released a report in 2023 highlighting how far Phoenix and
the other cities in the Valley have come to support the growth of the
technology sector. Greater-Phoenix-TechStory-2023.pdf (gpec.org)”
Also include a clickable hyperlink to the referenced report.
Page 168 Update the Phoenix Airport System spotlight economic impact
statistics as follows: “In 2022, the Phoenix Airport System (PHX,
DVT and GYR) total regional impact (direct, indirect, and induced)
was $44 billion dollars, with direct employment adding up to
140,546 jobs, and airline visitor (domestic and international)

Page 337
spending of $7 billion. Total tax revenues (federal, state, and local)
exceeded $6 billion. The Airport System achieves all this through
focusing on customer needs, valuing diversity and partnerships,
and maintaining facilities that are sustainable and loved by the
flying public.”
Page 170 Add “, and other eco-tourism supporting infrastructure” to the end of
the last sentence.
174 & Throughout Update square miles of the city to read as 529 square miles.
183 & Throughout Update font format and effects to make clear and legible.
Page 184 Update the spelling in the title to correctly spell “Precinct” and
update the spotlight descriptions first sentence to include the words
“is located” after the word “Precinct”
Pages 185-186 & Update resource in bulleted list from “Housing Consolidated Plan”
Throughout to “NSD Consolidated Plan”
Page 185 Update the second sentence from “Residents want to work in
concert with all departments to improve and enact...” to “Residents
and the city work together to improve and enact...”
Page 190 Update descriptive language to read “co-locating with non-
residential uses” instead of “with employment opportunities”
Page 197 Add a sentence at the end as follows “Ecotourism is a large
economic driver for the city as it is the most beautiful and diverse
desert in the world.”
Page 197, Last Revise as follows: “Open spaces can also serve as opportunities for
Sentence preserving native plants, incorporating water harvesting and green
stormwater infrastructure features like bioswales, all while further
contributing to the city’s overall sustainability, biodiversity, and well-
being.”
Page 202, Project Revise as follows: “approximately 1.7 million customers” and add a
Spotlight period at the end of the last sentence.
Page 203, 1st Remove “Green Stormwater Infrastructure” and replace with “GSI”
Paragraph, Last and change “permeable pavement” to “porous pavers”.
Sentence
Page 203 Update the following sentence from "Proper stormwater
management through green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) reduce
flooding and protect surface waters for a healthier community" to
"Proper stormwater management through green stormwater
infrastructure (GSI) reduce flooding, protect surface waters, and
can help reduce reliance on potable water irrigation for a healthier
community"
Page 203, Last Move the following sentence to the end of the paragraph: “These
Paragraph features are also sometimes referred to as low impact development
(LID)."
Page 204 Add a new policy as follows: 4. Promote and support GSI elements
as an approach to enhance wildlife habitat, natural washes, and
rivers, sustain native vegetation and water preservation towards
achieving climate resiliency.
Page 204, Policy 2 Change “types” to “elements”. Encourage and promote planning
and design of Green Stormwater Infrastructure types elements in
early phases of projects.
Page 204 Update the “Protects Water Quality” Section as follows: "GSI help
capture the first flush flows that carry the heaviest pollution that
otherwise rush to the city's waterways during a downpour. Instead,


Page 338
water captured by GSI gets slowly filtered and absorbed into the
water table."
Page 204 Update language under “Localized Flood Mitigation” section as
follows: “By capturing and infiltrating water close to where it falls, it
reduces the overload on the stormwater sewer system during and
after a rainstorm, reducing flood risk from overloaded stormwater
pipes. GSI can also help by capturing and infiltrating water where
no stormwater sewer system is available.”
Page 204 Update language under “Curb Opening” to include parking lots as
follow "…can be retrofitted into existing roadways or parking lot
medians…"
Page 205 Update title to include “Rain Gardens” also updated descriptive
language from this “The Phoenix Zoo in Papago Park completed a
redesign of its parking lot in 2022. The parking area was designed
to protect the natural drainage function of the washes, and installed
curb cuts for all landscaping and trees to be sustained by with
stormwater and used native plants and trees.” to this “The Phoenix
Zoo in Papago Park completed a design of its parking lot in 2022.
The parking area was designed to protect the natural drainage
function of the washes and capture runoff from the parking lot and
installed curb cuts for all landscaping and trees to be sustained by
with stormwater and used native plants and trees.”
Throughout Adjust placement of the “Click here to return to the Table of
Contents” box to avoid blocking substantive material on the page.
Page 207, First Replace the word “innovative” with “resident-driven”
Sentence
Page 208 Update to include “, ecological process” after the words
“environmental preservation”
Page 208 Add Mayor’s Monarch Pledge and Montreal Biodiversity Pledge
under the related policy initiatives and resources list with hyperlink.
Page 210 Update spotlight title to “Phoenix Mayor’s Monarch Pledge” and
updated language to include the Desert Botanical Garden as a key
partner.
Page 210 Update photo to celebrate the Mayor’s Monarch Pledge and new
spotlight title.
Pages 210-211 Update Goal Language from “Celebrate and protect our Rivers,
Washes and Waterways.” to “Celebrate and protect and restore our
Rivers, Washes and Waterways in their natural state and explore
potential to accommodate wildlife movement and passive recreation
corridors where possible.”
Page 211 Add Tres Rios Website to the Related Policy Initiatives and
Resources list.
Page 212 Remove “Brownfields are a liability for the city because they pose a
risk to public health, create barriers in maximizing existing
infrastructure and have unknown environmental conditions.”
Page 232 Change “Development” to “Develop”
Page 233 Update the 2nd Action item to include “trails along washes” as
follows: Continue to partner with adjacent property owners and
pursue grants that enhance multi-modal transportation
infrastructure and amenities along designated corridors like our
canals, trails along washes, mass transit corridors and the Rio
Salado.


Page 339
Page 233 Add new action: Support the Parks and Recreation Department in
an update of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan.
Page 234 Add new action: Partner with downtown stakeholders on an update
of the Downtown Strategic Plan.
Page 234 Second “Codes” Action, include “and other codes and ordinances”
after “Zoning Ordinance”
Page 234 Add new action: Develop and implement a process improvement
program to support enhanced customer service for customers
within the Planning and Development Department's plan review,
permit, and inspection processes.
Page 235 Update Partnerships Action to read as “to promote a diversity of
housing options and variety of income levels in appropriate
locations”
Page 236 Add “build the Sustainable Desert City” logo to top of page
Page 236 Update the following Action “Update the Tree and Shade Master
Plan” with “Support the Office of Heat Response and Mitigation with
an update to the Tree and Shade Master Plan”
Page 236 Update the following Action “Update the Climate Action Plan” with
“Support the Office of Environmental Programs with an update to
the Climate Action Plan”
Part IV after page 236 Add additional “IPlanPHX” page modeled off the City Council
Adopted 2015 General Plan Page 186.
Page 237 Update image to align more with “Sustainability”
Page 238 Remove “Michelle Pierson, Deputy Economic”
Page 238 Change “Office of Arts and Culture” to “Arts and Culture” and not
“Office of Arts and Culture” and Mitch Menchaca as Director, and
Carrie Brown as Deputy Director.
Page 238 Update Mitch Menchaca as Director and Carrie Brown as Deputy
Director.
Page 238 Replace “Balluf” with “Balluff”
Appendix H: Glossary Add General Plan Land Use definitions as adopted in GPA-1-08.
of Terms
Appendix H: Glossary Add definition to the glossary of terms: Accessory Dwelling Units
of Terms (ADUs) ADUs, often referred to as guest houses, casitas, or granny
flats are separate, self-continued living areas that are either fully
detached structures or attached to an existing home, with its own
external entrance. An ADU usually contains all of the amenities to
operate as a fully independent, operational dwelling, including a
kitchen, bathroom, living area and sleeping quarters.
Appendix H: Glossary Add definition to the glossary of terms: Green Stormwater
of Terms Infrastructure, or GSI means infrastructure constructed with a range
of measures that use plant or soil systems, permeable pavement or
other permeable surfaces or substrates, stormwater harvest and
reuse, or landscaping to store, infiltrate, or evapotranspirate
stormwater and reduce flows to the public storm drain system or to
surface waters. These features are also sometimes referred to as
low impact development (LID). They are generally small in size to
capture water where it falls for multiple co-benefits.
Appendix H: Glossary Add definition to the glossary of terms: High-capacity transit (HCT),
of Terms such as light rail, streetcar, or bus rapid transit, is designed to
efficiently move large volumes of people by operating on dedicated
tracks or right-of-way. HCT vehicles offer a balance between speed,

Page 340
capacity, and accessibility by allowing faster and more frequent
service, fewer stops, and the ability to carry more people than local
service transit.
Appendix H: Glossary Add definition to the glossary of terms: Missing Middle Housing is a
of Terms range of house-scale buildings with multiple units - compatible in
scale and form with detached single-family homes – located in a
walkable neighborhood. Missing middle housing refers to housing
that falls between single-family homes and mid-rise apartments.
Examples include duplexes, triplexes, townhomes, small
apartments, courtyard clusters, bungalows, fourplexes and live
work.
Appendices Add Place Type Matrix
Throughout Removed/replaced/updated references, footnotes, and sources and
renumbered pages accordingly throughout.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact Teleia
Galaviz at 602-291-2559, teleia.galaviz@phoenix.gov, TTY: Use 7-1-1.




Page 341



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing and Resolution Adoption - General Plan Amendment GPA-EST-2-
24-7 - Approximately 1,170 Feet North of the Northwest Corner of 67th Avenue
and Lower Buckeye Road (Resolution 22190)

Request to hold a public hearing on a General Plan Amendment for the following item
to consider adopting the Planning Commission's recommendation and the related
resolution if approved. Request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map designation
on 112.32 acres from Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre, Mixed Use
(Commercial / Commerce/Business Park) and Industrial to Commerce/Business Park.
This item is a companion case to Z-8-24-7 and must be heard first, followed by Z-8-24-
7.

Summary
Application: GPA-EST-2-24-7
Current Designation: Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre (96.44 acres), Mixed
Use (Commercial / Commerce/Business Park) (11.48 acres), and Industrial (4.40
acres)
Proposed Plan Designation: Commerce/Business Park
Acreage: 112.32
Proposal: Minor General Plan Amendment to allow for a commerce park development

Owner: Property Reserve Arizona, LLC c/o Brett Hopper
Applicant: Stephanie Watney, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval.
VPC Action: The Estrella Village Planning Committee heard this item on Feb. 20, 2024,
and recommended denial, by a vote of 7-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard the item on March 7, 2024, and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 6-2.

Location
Approximately 1,170 feet north of the northwest corner of 67th Avenue and Lower
Buckeye Road
Council District: 7


Page 342

Parcel Address: 1602, 1802, 2000, and 2300 S. 67th Ave.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 343
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION



RESOLUTION


A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2015
GENERAL PLAN FOR PHOENIX, APPLICATION GPA-EST-2-24-
7, CHANGING THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FOR THE
PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The 2015 Phoenix General Plan, which was adopted by

Resolution 21307, is hereby amended by adopting GPA-EST-2-24-7. The 112.32-acre

site located approximately 1,170 feet north of the northwest corner of 67th Avenue

and Lower Buckeye Road is designated as Commerce/Business Park.

SECTON 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the 2015 Phoenix General Plan to reflect this land use classification change as

shown below:




Page 344
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 3rd day of April 2024.



MAYOR




ATTEST:


____________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk




APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney




Page 345
By:___________________________
___________________________



REVIEWED BY:


______________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




Page 346
ATTACHMENT B




GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS
February 14, 2024
Application: GPA-EST-2-24-7

Applicant: Stephanie Watney, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC

Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC

Owner: Property Reserve Arizona LLC c/o Brett Hopper

Location: Approximately 1,170 feet north of the northwest
corner of 67th Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road

Acreage: 112.32 acres

Current Plan Designation: Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre (96.44
acres), Mixed Use (Commercial /
Commerce/Business Park) (11.48 acres) and
Industrial (4.40 acres)


Requested Plan Designation: Commerce/Business Park (112.32 acres)

Reason for Requested Change: Minor General Plan Amendment to allow for a
commerce park development

Estrella Village Planning
Committee Meeting Date: February 20, 2024

Staff Recommendation: Approval

FINDINGS:

1) The proposed Commerce/Business Park land use designation will help maximize
employment opportunities within the Estrella Village.

2) The companion rezoning case, Z-8-24-7, as stipulated, will provide extensive
building and landscape setbacks adjacent to the future multifamily development
and a proposed school location to the south.




Page 347
Staff Analysis
GPA-EST-2-24-7



3) The proposed Commerce/Business Park land use designation will be a
compatible transition from the Industrial designation to the north to the
Residential designation to the south.

BACKGROUND

The subject site is 112.32 gross acres and is located approximately 1,170 feet north of
the northwest corner of 67th Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road. The subject site is
currently vacant. The companion rezoning case Z-8-24-7 is requesting to rezone the
site from RE-35 (Single-Family Residence District) and R1-8 (Single-Family Residence
District) to CP/GCP (Commerce Park District/ General Commerce Park Option) to allow
a commerce park development.

This request proposes a minor amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map to allow
for commerce park uses. The proposal will modify the land use designation from 96.44
acres of Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre, 11.48 acres of Mixed Use
(Commercial / Commerce/Business Park), and 4.40 acres of Industrial to 112.32 acres
of Commerce/Business Park.

SURROUNDING LAND USES

NORTH
North of the subject site, are numerous warehouses and some outdoor storage
designated Industrial and Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce/Business Park).

SOUTH
South of the subject site is vacant land proposed as multifamily residential and a
property belonging to a school district designated Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per
acre.

EAST
A single-family residential development is located east of the subject site, across 67th
Avenue, designated as Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre.

WEST
To the west of the subject site, across 71st Avenue, is a single-family residential
development designated Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre. A warehouse is
located northwest of the subject site, across 71st Avenue and is designated Industrial.




Page 348
Staff Analysis
GPA-EST-2-24-7




Existing and Proposed General Land Use Designation Maps
Source: City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department

RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN CORE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES

CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES

• ENTREPRENEURS AND EMERGING ENTERPRISES; LAND USE
PRINCIPLE: Encourage land uses that promote the growth of
entrepreneurs or new businesses in Phoenix in appropriate locations.

This General Plan Amendment request, with the companion rezoning request, Z-
8-24-7, will support a variety of employment uses adjacent to 67th Avenue, an
arterial street. The development will provide a place for businesses to operate
and grow within the Estrella Village.

• Connect people and places core value; opportunity sites; land use
principle: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity, respectful of
local conditions and surrounding neighborhoods.

The proposal provides a reasonable level of intensity that is respectful to local
conditions. The companion rezoning case, Z-8-24-7, includes stipulations such
as enhanced elevations, landscape buffers with enhanced landscaping
standards, and large building setbacks to ensure the proposal will be compatible
with the surrounding uses.

• Safe Neighborhoods, Traffic: Land Use: Locate major traffic-generating
land uses on major streets in areas planned for such uses, or near parkway
and freeway access and transit centers or light rail transit stations, and
avoid use of local streets.

The proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation and companion rezoning
case would place proposed traffic-generating employment uses adjacent to 67th
Avenue. Furthermore, the proposed development will be required to build out
Durango Street which will deviate traffic to the north portion of the subject site,




Page 349
Staff Analysis
GPA-EST-2-24-7


away from proposed and existing residential uses.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends approval of GPA-EST-2-24-7. The proposed land use map
designation will maximize the property’s opportunity for development and serve as a
buffer from the industrial uses to the north and the proposed residential uses to the
south. Along with the companion rezoning case, Z-8-24-7, the General Plan
Amendment will allow land uses that will provide employment opportunities for the
Estrella community.

Writer
Nayeli Sanchez Luna
February 14, 2024

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
Sketch Maps (2 pages)




Page 350
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-EST-2-24-7 ACRES: 112.32 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Estrella COUNCIL DISTRICT: 7
APPLICANT: Withey Morris Baugh, PLC
EXISTING:
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 96.44 +/- Acres)
Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce /
Business Park) ( 11.48 +/- Acres)
Industrial ( 4.40 +/- Acres)




Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/acre
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/acre
Commercial
Industrial
Public/Quasi-Public


71ST AVE 67TH AVE
Parks/Open Space - Privately Owned
E E E E E
E E E E E

Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce /
E E E E E


Business Park)

LOWER BUCKEYE RD


PROPOSED CHANGE:
Commerce / Business Park ( 112.32 +/- Acres)




Proposed Change Area
Commerce / Business Park




71ST AVE
67TH AVE

LOWER BUCKEYE RD

Page 351
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-EST-2-24-7 ACRES: 112.32 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Estrella COUNCIL DISTRICT: 7
APPLICANT: Withey Morris Baugh, PLC
EXISTING:
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 96.44 +/- Acres)
Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce /
Business Park) ( 11.48 +/- Acres)
Industrial ( 4.40 +/- Acres)



Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac
Commercial
Industrial
Public/Quasi-Public
Parks/Open Space - Privately Owned

71ST AVE 67TH AVE
Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce/
Business Park)


LOWER BUCKEYE RD


PROPOSED CHANGE:
Commerce / Business Park ( 112.32 +/- Acres)




Proposed Change Area
Commerce / Business Park




71ST AVE
67TH AVE

LOWER BUCKEYE RD

Page 352
ATTACHMENT C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-EST-2-24-7

Date of VPC Meeting February 20, 2024
Request From Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre, Mixed Use
(Commercial / Commerce/Business Park), and Industrial
Request To Commerce/Business Park
Proposal Minor General Plan Amendment to allow for a commerce
park development
Location Approximately 1,170 feet north of the northwest corner
of 67th Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road
VPC Recommendation Denial
VPC Vote 7-1


VPC DISCUSSION:

Cases GPA-EST-2-24-7 and Z-8-24-7 are companion cases and were heard together.
Eight members of the public registered to speak.

Staff Presentation:

Nayeli Sanchez Luna, staff, presented an overview of the general plan amendment
and rezoning requests. Mrs. Sanchez Luna discussed the location of the stie, the
requested zoning designation, the surrounding land uses, and the proposed General
Plan Land Use Map designation. Mrs. Sanchez Luna displayed the site plan and
elevation and noted the proposed height, square footage, and architectural façade. Mrs.
Sanchez Luna concluded the presentation by providing the staff findings, the
recommendation, and summarizing the proposed stipulations.

Applicant Presentation:

Adam Baugh, representing the applicant with Withey Morris Baugh, PLC, provided an
overview of the proposed general plan amendment and rezone request. Mr. Baugh
displayed the conceptual site plan and noted the proximity to transportation corridors.
Mr. Baugh summarized the numerous changes to the site plan and noted the landscape
buffers when adjacent to single-family residential. Mr. Baugh noted other cities that had
commerce park buildings when adjacent to single-family residential and added that the
commerce park buildings increased property values. Mr. Baugh concluded the applicant
presentation by going over the outreach process and trip generation for the proposed
use.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 353
Estrella Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-EST-2-24-7


Questions from the Committee:

Chair Lisa Perez asked if the applicant provided 50 letters of support on the same day
of the hearing. Mr. Baugh confirmed affirmatively. Chair Perez noted that the letters
were not in the committee packet and that she would have preferred to receive them
with more time to review them.

Public Comments:

Laura Martinez noted that she has seen the vacant property used as an illegal dumping
site. Ms. Martinez voiced her support for the proposal because it bring jobs to the area.

Francisca Montoya stated that she was involved with the Fowler School District and
was a former member of the Village Planning Committee. Ms. Montoya noted that
industrial uses were located primarily along Buckeye Road but that the subject property
was closer to Lower Buckeye Road. Ms. Montoya added that Lower Buckeye Road was
primarily surrounded by single-family residential development. Ms. Montoya stated that
the proposed use should be located along the Loop 202 and that the proposed SR-30
has not received funding for construction. Ms. Montoya concluded her comment by
stating that school buses would use the same route as the commercial traffic, thus
causing a safety hazard.

Lorena Cardenas voiced her support for the proposed development. Ms. Cardenas
noted that it would bring jobs to the community.

Nathan Wright, with the Community and Economic Development Department (CED),
noted that there was only one other possible 1,000,000 square foot building in the City.
Mr. Wright added that south of the I-10 there weren’t any large commerce park buildings
that could support large businesses. Mr. Wright also supported the smaller warehouses
because they could bring amenities to the area such as dance studios or offices. Mr.
Wright concluded his comment by stating that they could market the 1,000,000 square
foot building. Chair Perez asked for more clarification on why CED was speaking at a
committee meeting in favor of a rezoning case. Mr. Wright noted that this is an
important project and that the CED takes close interest in any projects that bring high
quality jobs. Chair Perez noted that CED spoke with her once and asked why the
Department hadn’t done more outreach. Mr. Wright noted that they were also present
at the Laveen Village Planning Committee and that they advocate for job generating
projects.

Chair Perez stated that in the past, the committee had asked the City how they were
promoting the area; however, they never received an answer. Mr. Wright suggested
returning to the committee to listen to the community’s needs and reviewing proposed
projects in the area. Mr. Wright reiterated that they support job generating projects.
Angelica Terrazas voiced her agreement and asked CED to return to the committee.
Chair Perez noted that the technological corridor along the Loop 202 is an example of a
marketable area promoted by the City. Mr. Wright agreed.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 354
Estrella Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-EST-2-24-7


Abby Dunton stated that she worked with numerous HOAs along Lower Buckeye
Road. Ms. Dunton stated that she supported keeping the area zoned for residential
development. Ms. Dunton noted that there were existing commercial uses that rely on
residential uses and concluded her comment by stating that she was in opposition of the
development.

Selina Lemley stated that she lived in the area for many years. Ms. Lemley stated that
she supported a use that would ensure jobs. Ms. Lemley added that a Walmart is
located down the street to serve the community and stated that she would like the area
to be developed.

Olga Pritchett asked for more information regarding public outreach and asked if they
went house to house or if they just sent out notification letters. Mr. Baugh noted that
they went door-to-door.

Ms. Terrazas noted that everyone in the committee has experienced traffic congestion
with limited exits on Lower Buckeye Road. Ms. Terrazas noted her traffic congestion
concerns and encouraged a through street to alleviate traffic from major roads.

Peter Mastro asked what type of business requires a million square foot building. Mr.
Wright noted that there is a need for warehousing and advance manufacturing in the
solar industry or semi-conductors.

Applicant Response:

Mr. Baugh noted that any development would generate traffic. Mr. Baugh stated that a
single-family subdivision would create more traffic than the proposed commerce park
development. Mr. Baugh added that single-family residential will add to traffic during
peak hours in the morning and in the afternoon. Mr. Baugh reiterated the need for this
type of development in the area.

Committee Discussion:

Dafra Joel Sanou asked how the developer would dictate who leases the buildings. Mr.
Baugh stated that numerous uses could be used within the buildings including car
restoration or indoor entertainment for children and adults. Mr. Baugh reiterated that
there were many uses that could come into the building to add amenities to the area.
Mr. Baugh stated that they would ensure someone that would be there for a long time.

Co-Vice Chair Ceniceros asked how much additional pollution this would add to the
community. Mr. Baugh noted that he could not quantify pollution. Mr. Baugh stated that
the proposal included numerous stipulations to try to alleviate pollution and water
conservation.

Renee Dominguez stated that traffic on 67th Avenue is horrible and noted that
semitrailer and commercial traffic will further add to the existing traffic congestion
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 355
Estrella Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-EST-2-24-7

problem in the area. Ms. Dominguez stated that areas with a mixture of commerce park
and residential development have a lot of traffic congestion and safety issues. Mr.
Baugh noted that residential uses would create more congestion and that an accident
would create traffic congestion anywhere in the City.

Andre Serrette stated that he agreed that the village was very diverse when it came to
uses but wondered if this was the only place in the village that could accommodate the
proposed development. Mr. Baugh noted that they are developing to what the market
demands. Mr. Baugh added that there wasn’t a 1,000,000 square foot building in the
City and the smaller buildings could easily be leased out.

Melanie Burd asked about the traffic light at 67th Avenue and Durango. Mr. Baugh
displayed the location of the purposed traffic lights. Ms. Burd asked if the site will have
access via 71st Avenue or 67th Avenue. Mr. Baugh stated that access will be via 67th
Avenue. Ms. Burd stated that there should be an additional lane on 71st Avenue and
Lower Buckeye Road. Mr. Baugh noted that a traffic study would be required to analyze
the number of lanes. Ms. Burd asked if the proposed buildings could be used for a bar.
Mr. Baugh noted that that would not be allowed.

Ms. Burd asked if there was parking on the east side of the building. Mr. Baugh stated
that that would be employee parking. Ms. Burd voiced her concern for traffic along 71st
Avenue.

Chair Perez stated that she has met with numerous developers for this site and that
they always proposed commerce park or industrial uses. Chair Perez noted that the
south portion of the site was recently zoned to allow multifamily residential, and that the
representative did extensive outreach to the community. Chair Perez stated that this
representative only held one community meeting and that they did not present a
narrative of the project but rather just asked if the community had questions. Chair
Perez added that the committee has a right to comment on proposed warehouses and
commerce park buildings in the area. Chair Perez stated that there is a housing
shortage in the City but the proposal does not support additional housing. Chair Perez
stated that all these buildings are conceptual because there are no purposed tenants for
the buildings. Chair Perez voiced her concerns regarding the square footage,
employment parking and commercial parking. Chair Perez stated that she would like to
see more public outreach and more meetings with CED. Mr. Baugh noted that during
the public meeting, there were a few members that lived in close proximity to the
proposal and that the rest were part of the school district. Chair Perez added that
school employees would be directly affected by the development. Mr. Baugh stated that
they consider additional meetings based on the first public meeting. Mr. Baugh added
that they had contacted the district for a meeting. Chair Perez noted that this
development would impact a whole area of people other than those adjacent to the
development. Mr. Baugh noted that the number of people at the first meeting will
indicate if more meetings were needed. Mr. Baugh added that only two members of the
immediate area attended the meeting.



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 356
Estrella Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-EST-2-24-7

Ms. Dominguez stated that many property owners do not receive notification letters.
Ms. Dominguez added that there is a future school location and there is a nearby school
so extensive outreach would have been beneficial. Ms. Dominguez asked how many
houses were knocked on when the applicant went door-to-door. Mr. Baugh noted that
the door-to-door method exceeded what was required by the rezoning process. Ms.
Dominguez asked why they waited the weekend before the meeting to go door-to-door
and not allow the committee to review all the letters of support. Mr. Baugh noted that
they had a neighborhood meeting at the end of January.

Co-Vice Chair Ceniceros asked if the applicant was willing to continue to work with the
committee before a recommendation. Mr. Baugh voiced his agreement but stated that
they would like the case to move forward. Mr. Baugh added that he could hold a
meeting before Planning Commission.

Motion:
Co-Vice Chair Markus Ceniceros motioned to recommend the denial of GPA-EST-2-
23-7. Renee Dominguez seconded the motion.

Vote:
7-1, Motion passed with Committee Members Ayala, Burd, Dominguez, Sanou,
Serrette, Ceniceros, and Perez in favor and Committee Member Terrazas in opposition.

Staff comments regarding VPC Recommendation:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 357
ATTACHMENT D


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
March 7, 2024

ITEM NO: 9
DISTRICT NO.: 7
SUBJECT:

Application #: GPA-EST-2-24-7 (Companion Case Z-8-24-7)
Location: Approximately 1,170 feet north of the northwest corner of 67th Avenue and
Lower Buckeye Road
From: Industrial, Mixed Use (Commercial/Commerce/Business Park) and
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre
To: Commerce/Business Park
Acreage: 112.32
Proposal: Minor General Plan Amendment to clean up the mix of land use
designations and allow a framework for cohesive commerce park
development
Applicant: Stephanie Watney, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC
Owner: Brett Hopper, Property Reserve Arizona, LLC
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Estrella 2/20/2024 Denial. Vote: 7-1.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the staff recommendation.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Commissioner Mangum made a MOTION to approve GPA-EST-2-24-7, per the
staff recommendation.

Maker: Mangum
Second: Matthews
Vote: 6-2 (Jaramillo, Perez)
Absent: Busching
Opposition Present: Yes

Findings:

1. The proposed Commerce/Business Park land use designation will help maximize
employment opportunities within the Estrella Village.

2. The companion rezoning case, Z-8-24-7, as stipulated, will provide extensive building
and landscape setbacks adjacent to the future multifamily development and a proposed
school location to the south.

3. The proposed Commerce/Business Park land use designation will be a compatible
transition from the Industrial designation to the north to the Residential designation to
the south.

Page 358
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact Teleia
Galaviz at 602-291-2559, teleia.galaviz@phoenix.gov, TTY: Use 7-1-1.




Page 359
ATTACHMENT E
To Whom it May Concern,


I SUPPORT the Property Reserve Inc. park development project located on 116.5 acres north of
the northwest corner of 67th Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road in Phoenix. We support this
high-quality proposal, including the rezoning and general amendment plan (z-3- 84 and
GPA-EST-2-24).


The existing zoning for the Property has been carried over from the time of annexation into the
The proposal request facilitating development of current property to create a high-quality
speculative commerce park development which would include 4 flex buildings with a cumulative
space of 1.8 million square feet of shell warehouse space. These flex buildings will be divided to
accommodate smaller tenants' suites, this would address the dynamic need for small and larger
tenant and employer spaces. Consistent to CP/GCP regulations, the maximum height for each
building is set at 56 feet tall.
The design of the buildings is eye-catching and includes large windows along with a mint green
entryway that welcomes you to the property along with the mesquite trees and cacti surrounding
the lot. In addition, the proposal is to provide the area with new, high quality employment
opportunities in a way which is consistent and mindful of the area's land use pattern. This will
provide the area with more employment and business opportunities along with the ability to
create space for warehouses which are common in the area.
I am in full support of the Property Reserve Inc. project and am excited to see this
development revitalize the neighborhood and surrounding area with multiple opportunities.




SIGNATURE----=�'--- --�-------




PHONE



EMAIL




Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
ATTACHMENT F

Nayeli Sanchez Luna

Subject: FW: Review & Comment on General Plan Amendment in the Estrella Village (GPA-ES-2-24-7)




From: mjb cartof.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 10:04 AM
To: Geno Koman
Cc: Nayeli Sanchez Luna ; Racelle Escolar ; Joshua
Bednarek
Subject: RE: Review & Comment on General Plan Amendment in the Estrella Village (GPA‐ES‐2‐24‐7)

I don’t understand why we are taking a parcel (116 acres!) that is largely designated residential (both GPA and
zoning) and is surrounded by residential on 3 sides, and turning it into CP. Seems like a bad idea to me. At best, a
portion of it could be CP, and the majority should be residential.

Marcia Busching
Planning Commission, Vice chair





Page 410
Dear Estrella Village Planning Committee and Planning Commission,
I am writing to express my strong opposition to GPA-EST-2-24-7, arequest from
Property Reserve Arizona, LLC to modify the general plan land use map of 112.32
acres located approximately 1,170 feet north of the northwest corner of 67th Avenue
and Lower Buckeye Road from RE-35 and R1-8 to CP/GCP.


Proposal:
The General Plan Amendment Staff Analysis for a property located approximately 1,170
feet north of the northwest corner of 67th Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road. The
applicant, Stephanie Watney, and representative, Jason Morris, are requesting a minor
amendment to the General Plan to allow for a commerce park development. The
proposal will modify the land use designation from 96.44 acres of Residential 3.5 to 5
dwelling units per acre, 11.48 acres of Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce/Business
Park), and 4.40 acres of Industrial to 112.32 acres of Commerce/Business Park.


Analysis:
Estrella Village, over the past 50 years, has developed as a major hub for industrial,
commercial, and agricultural activities in Phoenix. It comprises a MAG designated major
employment center and is home to numerous warehousing, transportation, logistics,
shipping, and other businesses. The village has seen significant population growth
since the 2000 census, and it closely meets the goal of the General Plan to provide
housing, jobs, commercial development, recreation, transportation, and other urban
amenities. The central portion of the village has the largest concentration of commerce
park and industrial activity in the Valley with a significant amount of land available for
expansion.


Opposition Statement:
Given the existing high concentration of commerce park/general commerce park and
industrial development in Estrella Village, the proposed amendment to further increase
this concentration could exacerbate certain issues. These could include increased
traffic, noise pollution, and potential environmental concerns related to industrial
activities. Moreover, the amendment could limit the diversity of land use in the area,
potentially hindering the development of a balanced and vibrant community.
It’s also important to consider the potential impact on residential areas. The proposed
amendment could lead to an imbalance between commercial and residential spaces,
potentially affecting the quality of life for residents.
In light of these considerations, it would be prudent to deny the minor general plan
amendment. Instead, efforts could be directed towards encouraging a more balanced




Page 411
development approach that considers residential needs, environmental sustainability,
and community character alongside economic growth. This would help ensure that
Estrella Village remains a diverse, vibrant, and livable community.
The Land Use Goals for respective areas within the Estrella Village also support this
opposition. They promote and encourage compatible infill development with a mix of
housing types in neighborhoods close to employment centers, commercial areas, and
where transit or transportation alternatives exist. They also support the growth of land
uses that contribute to a healthy and sustainable food system (i.e., grocery stores,
community gardens, urban farms, and other urban agriculture elements). They
encourage land uses that promote the growth of entrepreneurs or new businesses in
Phoenix in appropriate locations and discourage the location of incompatible uses near
base industrial clusters. These goals align with the need for a balanced approach to
development in Estrella Village.
Sincerely


Dan Penton
8216 S 42nd Ave
Phoenix, AZ 85339




Page 412
Nayeli Sanchez Luna

From: Maria Martinez
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2024 8:42 PM
To: Nayeli Sanchez Luna
Subject: Against rezoning

Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged


Hi Nayeli Sanchez

I hope my voice is heard as a resident of west phoenix. We are tired of these industrial buildings. Please stop the
proposed rezoning and prioritize your residents. Thank you


- Maria Martinez





Page 413
Nayeli Sanchez Luna

From: Matteo Martinez-Lainez
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2024 8:52 PM
To: Nayeli Sanchez Luna
Subject: Against Rezoning

Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged


Hi Nayeli Sanchez

I hope my voice is heard as a long time resident of the west phoenix. We are TIRED of these industrial buildings, the
constant construction delays, AND these semi trucks. Please stop the proposed rezoning, start prioritize your residents
and start FIXING/EXPANDING our roads first!

Sincerely,
A very tried resident, Matteo Martinez



Get Outlook for iOS [aka.ms]





Page 414
Page 415
Page 416



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing and Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-8-24-7 -
Approximately 1,170 Feet North of the Northwest Corner of 67th Avenue and
Lower Buckeye Road (Ordinance G-7245)

Request to hold a public hearing and amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section
601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-8-24-7
and rezone the site from RE-35 (Single-Family Residence District) and R1-8 (Single-
Family Residence District) to CP/GCP (Commerce Park District/General Commerce
Park Option) to allow flex commerce park general commerce park buildings. This is a
companion case to GPA-EST-2-24-7 and should be heard following GPA-EST-2-24-7.

Summary
Current Zoning: RE-35 (111.30 acres) and R1-8 (1.02 acres)
Proposed Zoning: CP/GCP
Acreage: 112.32
Proposed Use: Flex commerce park general commerce park buildings
Owner: Property Reserve Arizona, LLC c/o Brett Hopper
Applicant: Stephanie Watney, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Estrella Village Planning Committee heard this item on Feb. 20, 2024,
and recommended denial, by a vote of 7-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on March 7, 2024, and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 6-2.

Location
Approximately 1,170 feet north of the northwest corner of 67th Avenue and Lower
Buckeye Road
Council District: 7
Parcel Address: 1602, 1802, 2000, and 2300 S. 67th Ave.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.


Page 417
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-8-24-7) FROM RE-35 (SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT) AND R1-8 (SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT) TO CP/GCP (COMMERCE PARK
DISTRICT/GENERAL COMMERCE PARK OPTION).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 112.32-acre site located approximately 1,170

feet north of the northwest corner of 67th Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road in a portion

of Section 13, Township 1 North, Range 1 East, as described more specifically in

Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from 111.30 acres of “RE-35” (Single-Family Residence

District) and 1.02 acres of “R1-8” (Single-Family Residence District) to “CP/GCP”

(Commerce Park District/General Commerce Park Option).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”




Page 418
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the elevations date
stamped January 8, 2024, as modified by the following stipulations and
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

2. One outdoor employee resting area of no less than 400 square feet or two 200-
square foot areas shall be provided on site. Each required pedestrian area
shall include a minimum of two pedestrian seating benches, constructed of
quality and durable materials, and shaded to a minimum of 75% using
minimum 2-inch caliper, large canopy, drought-tolerant, shade trees, and/or
architectural shade, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

3. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

4. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided per the requirements of Section
1307.H of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance through inverted U and/or artistic
racks located near the office and installed per the requirements of Section
1307.H of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Artistic racks shall adhere to the City
of Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle
Master Plan.

5. A minimum 100-foot landscape setback shall be provided along the south
perimeter of the site.

6. Landscape areas and surface retention areas shall be planted with minimum 2-
inch caliper, large canopy, drought-tolerant, shade trees planted 25 feet on
center or in equivalent groupings, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

7. A minimum of 10% of the required shrubs, shall be a milkweed or other native
nectar species, and shall be planted in groups of three or more, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

8. A minimum of 25% of the surface parking areas shall be shaded, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department. Shade may be achieved by




Page 419
structures or by minimum 2-inch caliper, drought tolerant, shade trees, or a
combination thereof.

9. Only landscape materials listed in the Phoenix Active Management Area Low-
Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List shall be utilized internal to the site, as
approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department

10. Landscaping shall be maintained by permanent and automatic/water efficient
WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers (or similar smart controller) to
minimize maintenance and irrigation water consumption for all on and offsite
landscape irrigation.

11. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the City of Phoenix Business
Water Efficiency Program for a minimum of 10 years, or as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

12. A minimum of two green infrastructure (GI) techniques for stormwater
management shall be implemented per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green
Infrastructure and Low-Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater
Management, as approved or modified by the Planning and Development
Department.

13. The development shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street
Landscaping Program landscape palette and landscaping standards along
arterial streets in the Estrella Village, except as otherwise noted herein, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

14. A minimum of 10% of the required parking spaces shall be EV Installed.

15. A bus stop pad shall be constructed on southbound 67th Avenue, located from
Durango Street according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258. The bus
stop pad shall be designed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1260
with a depth of 10 feet, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

16. A minimum 55-feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the west half of 67th
Avenue, adjacent to the development.

17. Improvements to 67th Avenue shall be consistent with the Arterial CM cross-
section, consisting of a 14-foot raised center median and a minimum 6-foot-
wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum 10-foot-wide landscape area,
adjacent to the development. The landscape strip shall be planted with
minimum 2-inch caliper, single trunk, drought-tolerant, shade trees to provide a
minimum of 75% shade, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the




Page 420
Planning and Development Department on alternative design solutions
consistent with a pedestrian environment.

18. A minimum 60-feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the full width of
Durango Street, adjacent to the development. The right-of-way shall align with
the existing Durango Street connections on the eastern and western
boundaries of the site.

19. A minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum 5-foot-
wide landscape area shall be constructed on both sides of Durango Street,
adjacent to the development. The landscape strip shall be planted with
minimum 2-inch caliper, single trunk, drought-tolerant, shade trees to provide a
minimum of 75% shade, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the
Planning and Development Department on alternative design solutions
consistent with a pedestrian environment.

20. A minimum 30-feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the east half of 71st
Avenue, adjacent to the development.

21. A minimum 1-foot Vehicular Non-Access Easement shall be dedicated along
the western property line (adjacent to 71st Avenue), south of the existing
Durango Street alignment.

22. A minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum 5-foot-
wide landscape area shall be constructed on the east side of 71st Avenue,
adjacent to the development. The landscape strip shall be planted with
minimum 2-inch caliper, single trunk, drought-tolerant, shade trees to provide a
minimum of 75% shade, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the
Planning and Development Department on alternative design solutions
consistent with a pedestrian environment.

23. A traffic signal shall be installed at 67th Avenue and Durango Street. The
developer shall fund 100% of the cost and install the traffic signal at the
intersection, as approved by the Street Transportation Department.

24. All existing electrical utilities within the public right-of-way shall be
undergrounded, adjacent to the development. The developer shall coordinate
with the affected utility companies for their review and permitting.

25. Existing SRP facilities along all public streets are to be relocated outside of city
right-of-way, unless otherwise approved by the Street Transportation
Department. Contact SRP to identify existing land rights and establish the
appropriate process to relocate the facility.




Page 421
26. Replace unused driveways with sidewalk and curb and gutter. Also, replace
any broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps on all streets and
upgrade all off-site improvements to be in compliance with current ADA
guidelines.

27. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

28. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

29. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 3rd day of April, 2024.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:




Page 422
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 423
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-8-24-7

A portion of the East half of Section 13, Township 1 North, Range 1 East of
the Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, being more
particularly described as follows:

BEGINNING at the East quarter corner of said Section 13, marked by a
found 3-inch City of Phoenix brass cap in hand hole, down 0.5 feet, from
which the Northeast corner, marked by a found 3 inch City of Phoenix
brass cap in hand hole, down 0.5 feet, thereof bears North 01°05'37" East,
2622.54 feet;

THENCE South 01°05'06" West, 1400.65 feet on the easterly boundary of
the Southeast quarter of said Section 13;

THENCE leaving said easterly line, North 88°55'11" West, 1766.47 feet to the
easterly boundary of the Special Warranty Deed, recorded date June 13th,
2002 and filed in Document No. 2002-0605378, Records of Maricopa
County, Arizona;

THENCE on said easterly boundary, North 00°50'36" East, 546.08 feet to the
northeast corner thereof;

THENCE North 89°00'36" West, 856.70 feet on the northerly boundary of
said Special Warranty Deed extended westerly to the westerly boundary of
said East half;

THENCE on said westerly boundary, North 00°50'41" East, 1491.37 feet;

THENCE leaving said westerly boundary, South 89°21'32" East, 2631.91
feet to the easterly boundary of the Northeast quarter of said Section 13;

THENCE on said easterly boundary, South 01°05'37" West, 655.59 feet to the point
of BEGINNING.

The above described parcel contains a computed area of 4,909,030 sq. ft.
(112.70 acres) more or less.

Being subject to any easements, restrictions, rights-of-way of record or otherwise.




Page 424
Page 425
ATTACHMENT B




Staff Report Z-8-24-7
February 15, 2024

Estrella Village Planning Committee February 20, 2024
Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 7, 2024

Request From: RE-35 (Single-Family Residence District)
(111.30 acres) and R1-8 (Single-Family
Residence District) (1.02 acres)
Request To: CP/GCP (Commerce Park District/General
Commerce Park Option) (112.32 acres)
Proposal: Flex commerce park general commerce park
buildings
Location: Approximately 1,170 feet north of the northwest
corner of 67th Avenue and Lower Buckeye
Road
Owner: Property Reserve Arizona, LLC c/o Brett
Hopper
Applicant: Stephanie Watney, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC
Staff Recommendation Approval, subject to stipulations


General Plan Conformity
Current: Industrial, Mixed Use (Commercial
/ Commerce/Business Park) and Residential
General Plan Land Use Map 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre
Designation
Proposed (GPA-EST-2-24-7):
Commerce/Business Park
33 to 38-feet
67th Avenue Arterial
west half street
Local (North of Durango
Street Map Street) 0-feet east half
Classification 71st Avenue
Minor Collector (South street
of Durango Street)
Durango Street Minor Collector 0 feet




Page 426
Staff Report: Z-8-24-7
February 15, 2024




CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE, OPPORTUNITY SITE; LAND USE
PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity, respectful of local
conditions and surrounding neighborhoods.
The proposal, as stipulated, will be required to provide a 100-foot landscape setback
adjacent to proposed multifamily residential uses to the south. Furthermore, landscape
setbacks and retention areas will be planted with large caliper shade trees to further
screen the proposed development from adjacent land uses.


CONNECT PEOPLE & PLACES CORE VALUE; COMPLETE STREETS; DESIGN
PRINCIPLE: In order to balance a more sustainable transportation system,
development should be designed to include increased amenities for transit,
pedestrian and bicyclists such as shade, water, seating, bus shelters, wider
sidewalks, bike racks, pedestrian scale lighting and way-finding.

Located adjacent to an arterial street, the proposal, as stipulated, will provide elements
for transit, pedestrians, and bicyclists in order to promote walking and alternative
transportation. These elements include shaded detached sidewalks along public streets
and bicycle parking located on site.


BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES AND SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new development
and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.

The proposal, as stipulated, will be required to provide shade along the adjacent public
sidewalks, amenity areas and parking. This will help to encourage walking and to
mitigate the urban heat island effect by covering hard surfaces, thus cooling the micro-
climate around the project vicinity.



Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives
Estrella Village Plan: Background Item No. 6.

Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping Program: Background Item No. 7.

Complete Streets Guiding Principles: Background Item No. 8.

Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan: Background Item No. 9.

Tree and Shade Master Plan: Background Item No. 10.




Page 427
Staff Report: Z-8-24-7
February 15, 2024



Monarch Butterfly Pledge: Background Item No. 11.

Transportation Electrification Action Plan: Background Item No. 12.

Conservation Measures for New Development: Background Item No. 13.

Phoenix Climate Action Plan: Background Item No. 14.

Zero Waste PHX: Background Item No. 15.

Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning
Land Use Zoning
On Site Vacant RE-35 and R1-8
Warehouses and outdoor
North A-1
storage
East (across 67th Avenue) Single-family residential R1-6 and R1-8
Vacant (proposed
South multifamily residential and R-2 and RE-35
school)
Warehouses and single-
West (across 71st Avenue) A-1 and R1-8
family residential

Commerce Park / General Commerce Park Option
Provisions on the
Standards Requirements
Proposed site Plan
Minimum Building Setbacks
North (Perimeter, adjacent to Approximately 180 feet
20 feet
A-1) (Met)
East (Perimeter, adjacent to Approximately 100 to
30 feet
67th Avenue) 248 feet (Met)
South (Perimeter, adjacent to
20 feet 192 feet (Met)
R-2)
South (Perimeter, adjacent to Approximately 600 feet
20 feet
RE-35) (Met)
West (Perimeter, adjacent to
20 feet 165 feet (Met)
RE-35)
West (Perimeter, adjacent to
30 feet 245 feet (Met)
71st Avenue)




Page 428
Staff Report: Z-8-24-7
February 15, 2024



Minimum Landscaped Setbacks
North (Perimeter, adjacent to
5 feet 50 feet (Met)
A-1)
East (Perimeter, adjacent to
30 feet 30 feet (Met)
67th Avenue)
South (Perimeter, adjacent to
5 feet 101 feet – 122 feet (Met)
R-2)
South (Perimeter, adjacent to Approximately 240 feet
5 feet
RE-35) (Met)
West (Perimeter, adjacent to
5 feet 93 feet (Met)
RE-35)
West (Perimeter, adjacent to
30 feet 52 feet (Met)
71st Avenue)
Maximum Lot Coverage 50% 37% (Met)
18-foot maximum height is
permitted within 30 feet of
the perimeter lot line, then
one-foot of additional height
Maximum Building Height is allowed for every 3 feet of 52 feet (Met)
additional setback,
maximum 56 feet to 80 feet
with a use permit and site
plan.
Unspecified Use (Shell
Building): For buildings
between 150,001 square
feet to 500,000 square feet,
1 space per 2,000 square
Minimum Parking feet. 1,664 parking spaces
Requirements Unspecified Use (Shell (Met)
Building): For buildings
greater than 150,001
square feet, 1 space per
2,500 square feet.
778 spaces required
*Variance or Site Plan modification needed




Page 429
Staff Report: Z-8-24-7
February 15, 2024


Background/Issues/Analysis

SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone 112.32 acres located approximately 1,170 feet north of
the northwest corner of 67th Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road from RE-35
(Single-Family Residence District) to CP/GCP (Commerce Park District/General
Commerce Park Option) to allow flex commerce park general commerce park
buildings. The site is currently vacant and undeveloped. The proposed CP/GCP
zoning will support new employment opportunities within the Estrella Village.

SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
2. The area to the north consists of numerous warehouses and outdoor storage
zoned A-1. To the east, across 67th Avenue, are single-family residences zoned
R1-6 (Single-Family Residence District) and R1-8 (Single-Family Residence
District). Vacant property owned by the Fowler School District is located
southwest of the subject site and zoned RE-35 (Single-Family Residence
District). Vacant land, proposed as a multifamily development is located south of
the site, zoned R-2 (Multifamily Residence District). A warehouse building is
located to the northwest of the site across 71st Avenue, zoned A-1 (Light
Industrial District). Finally, west of the subject site, across 71st Avenue, is a
single-family residential development zoned R1-8.




Existing Zoning Aerial Map
Source: Planning and Development Department




Page 430
Staff Report: Z-8-24-7
February 15, 2024



GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION
3. The majority of the subject site is designated Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units
per acre on the General Plan Land Use Map. A portion of the northeast corner is
designated Industrial, and the remainder of the site is designated as Mixed Use
(Commercial / Commerce/Business Park).

The property to the north is designated as Industrial and Mixed Use (Commercial
/ Commerce/Business Park). East of the subject site, across 67th Avenue, south,
and west across 71st Avenue is designated Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units
per acre. Northwest of the subject site, across 71st Avenue, is designated as
Industrial.

To ensure consistency with the General Plan, a concurrent General Plan Land
Use Map amendment, GPA-EST-2-24-7, is proposed to change the land use
map designation of the entire site to Commerce/Business Park. The requested
CP/GCP zoning is consistent with the proposed General Plan Land Use Map
designation.




General Plan Land Use Map
Source: Planning and Development Department

PROPOSAL
4. Site Plan
The conceptual site plan depicts a proposed east-west public street from 67th
Avenue to 71st Avenue. A 1,242,000-square foot warehouse building is
proposed north of the street adjacent to the existing warehouse uses to the
north. Commercial parking and loading docks will be located north and south of
the building, away from public view. South of the street are three smaller
warehouse buildings ranging from approximately 177,000 to 190,000 square
feet. Loading docks are proposed internal to the site and the buildings are
surrounded by employee and customer parking. The proposed site plan depicts
an approximate 120-foot landscape setback along the south perimeter adjacent
to the proposed multifamily residential development and vacant land belonging to
the Fowler School District. The Street Transportation Department has indicated
that Durango Street must be built straight across the alignments located along



Page 431
Staff Report: Z-8-24-7
February 15, 2024


71st Avenue and 67th Avenue. The Durango Street alignment is located north of
the proposed public street. As a result, staff does not recommend general
conformance to the site plan. In order to ensure an enhanced buffer adjacent to
proposed residential uses, staff recommends Stipulation Nos. 5 and 6 to ensure
the large landscape setbacks proposed adjacent to residential uses and
enhanced planting standards. Due to the number of proposed commerce park
buildings, staff recommends Stipulation No. 2 which would require shaded
employee resting areas.




Master Site Plan
Source: Butler Design Group, Inc.

5. Elevations
The conceptual building elevations, attached as an exhibit, depict four 52-foot-tall
industrial/commerce park buildings. The conceptual building elevations depict
architectural features that include variation in colors, building articulation, and
emphasizes the corner of each building. Staff is recommending general
conformance to these building elevations per Stipulation No. 1.




Page 432
Staff Report: Z-8-24-7
February 15, 2024




Conceptual Building Rendering
Source: Butler Design Group, Inc.

PLANS, OVERLAYS, AND INITIATIVES
6. Estrella Village Plan
The Estrella Village Plan adopted in 1999, outlines a vision for developing the
Estrella Village through five main goals that include:
1. Orderly growth;
2. Identifiable village core;
3. Strong residential neighborhoods;
4. Variety of homes and jobs; and
5. Consistent streetscapes and trail linkages.




Estrella Land Use Map
Source: Planning and Development Department




Page 433
Staff Report: Z-8-24-7
February 15, 2024


Goal 1, “Growth”, recommends industrial development to utilize commerce park
development standards. The proposed CP/GCP zoning will act as a buffer
between the industrial uses to the north zoned A-1 and the proposed multifamily
residential uses to the south zoned R-2. The proposal will include enhanced
landscape buffers, street frontages and enhanced building elevations facing the
public streets. This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 1, 5, and 6.

Goal 5, “Urban Design”, Objective D, “Street Appearance” recommends
industrial properties along major streets and adjoining residential neighborhoods
to be well landscaped and open storage and activity screened from view. Several
stipulations as recommended by staff and would promote enhanced urban
design along the streetscapes. Lastly, Stipulation Nos. 17, 19, and 22 includes
provisions for a detached sidewalk along Durango Street, 71st Avenue and 67th
Avenue with enhanced landscaping between the back of the curb and sidewalk.

7. Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping Program
The Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping Program adopted in 1999,
provides a landscape palette for arterial streets within the Estrella Village to help
establish the community’s character. In addition to providing planning guidelines,
the plan also indicates the locations to establish entry gateways that welcome
individuals entering the village with an entry sign and an enhanced landscape
area of 75 feet by 75 feet in size.

The subject site is adjacent to 67th Avenue, an arterial street. Thus, staff
recommends Stipulation No. 13 to require adherence with the Estrella Village
Arterial Street Landscaping Program requirements along the street frontage to
promote the community’s character.

8. Complete Streets Guiding Principles
In 2014, the City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding
Principles. The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an
accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such as
bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. To provide a safe pedestrian
environment staff is recommending enhanced pavement treatment for the on-site
pedestrian walkways that cross vehicular drive aisles. This is addressed in
Stipulation No. 3. Stipulation Nos. 17, 19, and 22 will help pedestrianize the
immediate street frontage by providing a detached sidewalk along Durango
Street, 67th Avenue, and 71st Avenue. Furthermore, bicycle parking will be
required on the site to encourage alternative transportation. This is addressed in
Stipulation No. 4. In addition, any street improvements must comply to City of
Phoenix and ADA standards. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 27.




Page 434
Staff Report: Z-8-24-7
February 15, 2024


9. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Pan
The City of Phoenix adopted the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan in 2014 to
guide the development of its Bikeway System and supportive infrastructure. The
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan supports options for both short- and long-
term bicycle parking as a means of promoting bicyclist traffic to a variety of
destinations. As stipulated, the project will provide bicycle parking spaces,
installed per the requirements in the city’s Walkable Urban (WU) Code. This is
addressed in Stipulation No. 4.

10. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan encourages treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure the trees are an integral part of the City’s planning and
development process. Sidewalks on the street frontages should be detached
from the curbs to allow trees to be planted on both sides of the sidewalk to
provide thermal comfort for pedestrians and to reduce the urban heat island
effect. Staff is recommending stipulations designed to provide trees and
enhanced shade within and adjacent to the development. Staff is recommending
stipulations designed to provide trees and enhanced shade within the
development as follows:

• All required landscape and retention areas shall be planted with two-inch
caliper large canopy, drought tolerant trees (Stipulation No. 6);

• Uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with minimum
two-inch caliper drought tolerant shade trees to achieve a minimum of 25
percent shade (Stipulation No. 8);

• Detached sidewalks along 67th Avenue shall be planted with two-inch
caliper trees (Stipulation No. 17);

• Detached sidewalk along Durango Street shall be planted with two-inch
caliper trees (Stipulation No. 19);

• Detached sidewalk along 71st Avenue shall be planted with two-inch
caliper trees (Stipulation No. 22).

11. Monarch Butterfly Pledge
In April 2021, Mayor Kate Gallego signed the National Wildlife Federation's
Mayor's Monarch Pledge. This pledge commits the city to take action to support
the monarch butterfly population. In the United States, loss of milkweed habitat is
a major factor in the decline of the monarchs. Arizona has at least 29 species of
milkweed native to the state. Adult monarchs feed on the nectar of many flowers,




Page 435
Staff Report: Z-8-24-7
February 15, 2024


but they breed only where milkweeds are found. To support the monarch
butterfly population, Stipulation No. 7 will require the planting of milkweed
shrubs, or other native nectar plant species on the subject site.

12. Transportation Electrification Action Plan
In June 2022, the Phoenix City Council approved the Transportation
Electrification Action Plan. The current market desire for the electrification of
transportation is both a national and global phenomenon, fueled by a desire for
better air quality, a reduction in carbon emissions, and a reduction in vehicle
operating and maintenance costs. Businesses, governments and the public are
signaling strong future demand for electric vehicles (EVs), and many automobile
manufacturers have declared plans for a transition to fully electric offerings within
the coming decade. This Plan contains policy initiatives to prepare the City for a
future filled with more EVs, charging infrastructure and e-mobility equity, and
outlines a roadmap for a five-step plan to prepare for the EV infrastructure needs
of 280,000 EVs in Phoenix by 2030. One goal of the Plan, to accelerate public
adoption of electric vehicles through workplace, business, and multifamily
charging infrastructure, is to recommend a standard stipulation for rezoning
cases to provide EV charging infrastructure. This is addressed in Stipulation No.
14.

13. Conservation Measures for New Development
In June 2023, the Phoenix City Council adopted the Conservation Measures for
New Development policy as part of a resolution addressing the future water
consumption of new development (Resolution 22129). This resolution addresses
the future water consumption of new development to support one of the City’s
Five Core Values in the General Plan which calls for Phoenix to - Build the
Sustainable Desert City. The Conservation Measures for New Development
policy includes direction to develop standards for consideration as stipulations for
all rezoning cases that will address best practices related to water usage in nine
specific categories. This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 8 through 12.

14. Phoenix Climate Action Plan
In October 2021, the Phoenix City Council approved the Climate Action Plan.
The Climate Action Plan will serve as a long-term plan to achieve greenhouse
gas emissions reductions and resiliency goals from local operations
and community activities as well as prepare for the impacts of climate change.
This plan contains policy and initiatives regarding stationary energy,
transportation, waste management, air quality, local food systems, heat, and
water. Goal W2 (Water), Action W2.4, pertains to the implementation of the
Greater Phoenix Green Infrastructure (GI) and Low Impact Development Details
for Alternative Stormwater Management to benefit the environment, promote
water conservation, reduce urban heat, improve the public health, and create
additional green spaces. This goal is addressed in Stipulation No. 12, which




Page 436
Staff Report: Z-8-24-7
February 15, 2024


requires a minimum of two GI techniques for stormwater management to be
implemented in this development.

15. Zero Waste PHX:
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal
to become a zero waste city, as part of the city’s overall 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and
expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs. Section 716 of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance establishes standards to encourage the provision of
recycling containers for multifamily, commercial, and mixed-use developments
meeting certain criteria. The applicant’s submittal indicates that recycled waste
pickup will be coordinated with a third party provider.

COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
16. At the time this staff report was written, staff has received four letters of
opposition for this rezoning application. The stated concerns are commerce park
buildings surrounded by single-family residential homes, traffic congestion,
pollution, commercial traffic in residential neighborhoods, and lack of commercial
zoning in the area.

INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
17. Street Transportation Department
The Street Transportation Department has requested the following:
• A 55-foot dedication for the west half of 67th Avenue.
• Improvements to 67th Avenue including a center median and a detached
sidewalk.
• A 60-foot dedication for Durango Street.
• A detached sidewalks along both sides of Durango Street.
• A 30-foot dedication for the east half of 71st Avenue.
• A one-foot dedication for a Vehicular Non-Access Easement along 71st
Avenue.
• A detached sidewalk along the east side of 71st Avenue.
• A traffic signal at 67th Avenue and Durango Street.
• All existing electrical utilities must be undergrounded.
• Existing SRP facilities located along 67th Avenue must be relocated
outside of the City right-of-way.
• The replacement of unused driveways with sidewalk, curb, and gutter.
• All streets shall be constructed with all required elements and to ADA
requirements.

These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 16 through 27.




Page 437
Staff Report: Z-8-24-7
February 15, 2024


18. Public Transportation Department
The Public Transportation Department has requested a bus stop pad on
southbound 67th Avenue. The proposed bus stop pad must meet the City of
Phoenix Standard Detail P1258. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 15.

OTHER
19. The site has not been identified as being archaeologically sensitive. However, in
the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, all
ground disturbing activities must cease within 33-feet of the discovery and the
time to properly assess the materials. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 28.

20. Staff has not received a completed form for the Waiver of Claims for Diminution
in Value of Property under Proposition 207 (A.R.S. 12-1131 et seq.), as required
by the rezoning application process. Therefore, a stipulation has been added to
require the form be completed and submitted prior to final site plan approval.
This is addressed in Stipulation No. 29.

21. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and
ordinances. Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements.
Other formal actions such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and
abandonments, may be required.

Findings

1. The proposal is compatible with the proposed General Plan Land Use Map
designation and will provide employment opportunities within the Estrella Village.

2. The proposal contains enhanced standards that will result in a more walkable,
shaded and pedestrian-friendly environment. The proposal will provide
increased shade which will help to reduce the urban heat island effect.

3. As stipulated, the proposed development will include development and design
standards, such as enhanced streetscapes, landscape buffer and planting
standards, to mitigate impacts to the surrounding properties.

Stipulations

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the elevations date
stamped January 8, 2024, as modified by the following stipulations and approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

2. One outdoor employee resting area of no less than 400 square feet or two 200-
square foot areas shall be provided on site. Each required pedestrian area shall




Page 438
Staff Report: Z-8-24-7
February 15, 2024


include a minimum of two pedestrian seating benches, constructed of quality and
durable materials, and shaded to a minimum of 75% using minimum 2-inch
caliper, large canopy, drought-tolerant, shade trees, and/or architectural shade,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

3. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

4. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided per the requirements of Section 1307.H
of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance through inverted U and/or artistic racks located
near the office and installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Artistic racks shall adhere to the City of Phoenix
Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.

5. A minimum 100-foot landscape setback shall be provided along the south
perimeter of the site.

6. Landscape areas and surface retention areas shall be planted with minimum 2-
inch caliper, large canopy, drought-tolerant, shade trees planted 25 feet on
center or in equivalent groupings, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

7. A minimum of 10% of the required shrubs, shall be a milkweed or other native
nectar species, and shall be planted in groups of three or more, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

8. A minimum of 25% of the surface parking areas shall be shaded, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department. Shade may be achieved by
structures or by minimum 2-inch caliper, drought tolerant, shade trees, or a
combination thereof.

9. Only landscape materials listed in the Phoenix Active Management Area Low-
Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List shall be utilized internal to the site, as
approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department

10. Landscaping shall be maintained by permanent and automatic/water efficient
WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers (or similar smart controller) to minimize
maintenance and irrigation water consumption for all on and offsite landscape
irrigation.

11. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the City of Phoenix Business Water




Page 439
Staff Report: Z-8-24-7
February 15, 2024


Efficiency Program for a minimum of 10 years, or as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

12. A minimum of two green infrastructure (GI) techniques for stormwater
management shall be implemented per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green
Infrastructure and Low-Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater
Management, as approved or modified by the Planning and Development
Department.

13. The development shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street
Landscaping Program landscape palette and landscaping standards along
arterial streets in the Estrella Village, except as otherwise noted herein, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

14. A minimum of 10% of the required parking spaces shall be EV Installed.

15. A bus stop pad shall be constructed on southbound 67th Avenue, located from
Durango Street according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258. The bus
stop pad shall be designed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1260
with a depth of 10 feet, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

16. A minimum 55-feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the west half of 67th
Avenue, adjacent to the development.

17. Improvements to 67th Avenue shall be consistent with the Arterial CM cross-
section, consisting of a 14-foot raised center median and a minimum 6-foot-wide
detached sidewalk separated by a minimum 10-foot-wide landscape area,
adjacent to the development. The landscape strip shall be planted with minimum
2-inch caliper, single trunk, drought-tolerant, shade trees to provide a minimum
of 75% shade, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

18. A minimum 60-feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the full width of
Durango Street, adjacent to the development. The right-of-way shall align with
the existing Durango Street connections on the eastern and western boundaries
of the site.

19. A minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum 5-foot-wide
landscape area shall be constructed on both sides of Durango Street, adjacent
to the development. The landscape strip shall be planted with minimum 2-inch
caliper, single trunk, drought-tolerant, shade trees to provide a minimum of 75%




Page 440
Staff Report: Z-8-24-7
February 15, 2024


shade, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. Where utility
conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and Development
Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian
environment.

20. A minimum 30-feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the east half of 71st
Avenue, adjacent to the development.

21. A minimum 1-foot Vehicular Non-Access Easement shall be dedicated along the
western property line (adjacent to 71st Avenue), south of the existing Durango
Street alignment.

22. A minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum 5-foot-wide
landscape area shall be constructed on the east side of 71st Avenue, adjacent to
the development. The landscape strip shall be planted with minimum 2-inch
caliper, single trunk, drought-tolerant, shade trees to provide a minimum of 75%
shade, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. Where utility
conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and Development
Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian
environment.

23. A traffic signal shall be installed at 67th Avenue and Durango Street. The
developer shall fund 100% of the cost and install the traffic signal at the
intersection, as approved by the Street Transportation Department.

24. All existing electrical utilities within the public right-of-way shall be
undergrounded, adjacent to the development. The developer shall coordinate
with the affected utility companies for their review and permitting.

25. Existing SRP facilities along all public streets are to be relocated outside of city
right-of-way, unless otherwise approved by the Street Transportation
Department. Contact SRP to identify existing land rights and establish the
appropriate process to relocate the facility.

26. Replace unused driveways with sidewalk and curb and gutter. Also, replace any
broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps on all streets and
upgrade all off-site improvements to be in compliance with current ADA
guidelines.

27. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.




Page 441
Staff Report: Z-8-24-7
February 15, 2024



28. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

29. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

Writer
Nayeli Sanchez Luna
February 15, 2024

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
Sketch map
Aerial map
Conceptual site plan date stamped January 8, 2024 (2 pages)
Conceptual elevations date stamped January 8, 2024
Conceptual elevation renderings date stamped January 8, 2024
Correspondence (4 pages)




Page 442
PA
PA
G OS
T
YUMA ST
T T
AS R AS
PIM NO
A-1 * SO
65 T
A-1 A-1*
Z-153-07 A-1 R1-6 * VE
Z-132-95 HA
Z-305-85



65TH GLN
S T
R CE
Z PE
NE

66TH LN
MOHAVE ST PO
MO
ST


CHICKASAW ST

DURANGO ST
HESS AVE
GROSS AVE


HESS ST
A-1
72ND LN
R1-8 *
ANX 166 Z-37-98
WHYMAN AVE HILTON AVE R1-8 PRD
Z-2-99
ZAK RD R1-8 * ANX 208
RE-35 Z-84-98


71ST AVE 65TH LN
WATKINS ST




67TH AVE
HUGHES DR


72ND AVE
R1-6 *

71ST LN 71ST DR
Z-12-14
RE-35 R-2 * MAGNOLIA ST



73RD AVE
Z-72-21



65TH DR
C-2 *

73RD DR
C-2 * ANX 237
PRESTON LN
Z-72-21 Z-120-00 RE-35
R1-8 * LOWER BUCKEYE RD S-1 *


70TH DR
C-2 *
Z-85-99 Phoenix City Limits Z-107-06
R1-8 PCD * S-1
RE-35 Z-114-06
R1-8 PRD
ANX 116
Z-144-04 MARICOPA COUNTY C-1 * R1-8 PRD *
Z 130 98 ANX 200 ANX 200


I
Z-8-24
I-10

VAN BUREN ST I-17
Miles
BUCKEYE RD
0.1 0.05 0 0.1
ESTRELLA VILLAGE LOWER BUCKEYE RD


CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 7 BROADWAY RD


43RD AVE 35TH AVE 27TH AVE 19TH AVE
51ST AVE
SR 202 (Proposed)
67TH AVE
SOUTHERN AVE


75TH AVE
91ST AVE 83RD AVE
99TH AVE
107TH AVE 59TH AVE




APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Withey Morris Baugh, PLC
FROM:
RE-35 ( 111.30 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO.
Z-8-24
DATE:
2/01/2024
REVISION DATES:
R1-8 ( 1.02 a.c.)
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
112.32 Acres QS 7-12, QS 8-12 E-4, F-4 TO: CP/GCP ( 112.32 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
RE-35, R1-8 122, 4 147, 5
CP/GCP N/A N/A
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Page 443
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2024\Z-8-24.mxd
PA
PA
G OS
T
YUMA ST
T T
AS R AS
PIM NO
A-1 * SO
65 T
A-1 A-1*
Z-153-07 A-1 R1-6 * VE
Z-132-95 HA
Z-305-85



65TH GLN
S T
R CE
Z PE
NE

66TH LN
MOHAVE ST PO
MO
ST


CHICKASAW ST

DURANGO ST
HESS AVE
GROSS AVE


HESS ST
A-1
72ND LN
R1-8 *
ANX 166 Z-37-98
WHYMAN AVE HILTON AVE R1-8 PRD
Z-2-99
ZAK RD R1-8 * ANX 208
RE-35 Z-84-98


71ST AVE 65TH LN
WATKINS ST




67TH AVE
HUGHES DR


72ND AVE
R1-6 *

71ST LN 71ST DR
Z-12-14
RE-35 R-2 * MAGNOLIA ST



73RD AVE
Z-72-21



65TH DR
C-2 *

73RD DR
C-2 * ANX 237
PRESTON LN
Z-72-21 Z-120-00 RE-35
R1-8 * LOWER BUCKEYE RD S-1 *


70TH DR
C-2 *
Z-85-99 Phoenix City Limits Z-107-06
R1-8 PCD * S-1
RE-35 Z-114-06
R1-8 PRD
ANX 116
Z-144-04 MARICOPA COUNTY C-1 * R1-8 PRD *
Z 130 98 ANX 200 ANX 200


I
Z-8-24
I-10

VAN BUREN ST I-17
Miles
BUCKEYE RD
0.1 0.05 0 0.1
ESTRELLA VILLAGE LOWER BUCKEYE RD


CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 7 BROADWAY RD


43RD AVE 35TH AVE 27TH AVE 19TH AVE
51ST AVE
SR 202 (Proposed)
67TH AVE
SOUTHERN AVE


75TH AVE
91ST AVE 83RD AVE
99TH AVE
107TH AVE 59TH AVE




APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Withey Morris Baugh, PLC
FROM:
RE-35 ( 111.30 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO.
Z-8-24
DATE:
2/01/2024
REVISION DATES:
R1-8 ( 1.02 a.c.)
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
112.32 Acres QS 7-12, QS 8-12 E-4, F-4 TO: CP/GCP ( 112.32 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
RE-35, R1-8 122, 4 147, 5
CP/GCP N/A N/A
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Page 444
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2024\Z-8-24.mxd
20'
B.S.B.
12' 50'
Proposed Zoning: CP/GCP
A. DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF THIS SITE WILL CONFORM WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND
ORDINANCES. APN#: 104-29-005, 104-36-001C
B. THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF PHOENIX WATER SERVICES AREA AND HAS BEEN
60'
154 TRAILERS
DESIGNATED AS HAVING AN ASSURED WATER SUPPLY.
C. ALL NEW OR RELOCATED UTILITIES WILL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND. 240' 286'-5"
60' 50' Net Site Area: 4,931,907 S.F. (113.2 AC.)
D. STRUCTURES AND LANDSCAPING WITHIN A TRIANGLE MEASURED BACK 10'-0" FROM THE 40' 190'
PROPERTY LINE AND 20'-0" ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE ON EACH SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY (Excluding additional ROW dedication)
ENTRANCES ENTRANCES WILL BE MAINTAINED AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 3'-0".
E. STRUCTURES AND LANDSCAPING WITHIN A TRIANGLE MEASURING 33' x 33' ALONG THE 70' Total Building Area: +/- 1,800,500 S.F.
PROPERTY LINES WILL BE MAINTAINED AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 3'-0".
F. ANY LIGHTING WILL BE PLACED SO AS TO DIRECT THE LIGHT AWAY FROM ADJACENT Coverage: 1,800,500 / 4,931,907 = 37%
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS AND WILL NOT EXCEED ONE FOOT CANDLE AT THE PROPERTY LINE. 2072' (2073'-6")
70'
NO NOISE, ODOR OR VIBRATION WILL BE EMITTED SO THAT IT EXCEEDS THE GENERAL LEVEL
OF NOISE, ODOR OR VIBRATION EMITTED BY USES OUTSIDE OF THE SITE. 8'-6" TYP.
G. OWNER OF PROPERTY ADJACENT TO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY Parking Required (Unspecified Industrial Use - Shell Bldg.)
FOR MAINTAINING ALL LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH
APPROVED PLANS. Building A - 1,242,000 S.F. (500,001 and greater S.F.
H. THE EXISTING STRUCTURES MUST COMPLY WITH THE CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY PROVISIONS
IN THE PHOENIX CONSTRUCTION CODE PRIOR TO USE. 30' = 1/2,500 S.F.) : 497 Spaces
I. AFTER FINAL APPROVAL THE PROJECT WILL BE RE-INSPECTED FOR ZONING COMPLIANCE 22' 18' 18' 16'
DURING CONSTRUCTION AND PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY. THE APPLICANT IS TO NOTIFY PDD 26' 24' 26' 50'-7" Building B - 190,700 S.F. (150,001 to 500,000 S.F.
PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY TO ARRANGE FOR INSPECTIONS. CALL 602-262-6981 AND REQUEST A 18' 18' 22' 16' 18' 18' = 1/2,000 S.F.): 96 Spaces
DESIGN REVIEW INSPECTION. 12' 26' 26' BLDG. A 30'
J. ALL ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT AND SATELLITE DISHES SHALL BE SCREENED TO THE HEIGHT OF 16' 16' 1,242,000 SF. B.S.B. Building C - 177,100 S.F. (150,001 to 500,000 S.F.
THE TALLEST EQUIPMENT. 245'-8"
K. ALL SERVICE AREAS SHALL BE SCREENED TO CONCEAL TRASH CONTAINERS, LOADING
= 1/2,000 S.F.): 89 Spaces
DOCKS, TRANSFORMERS, BACK FLOW PREVENTERS, AND OTHER MECHANICAL OR Building D - 190,700 S.F. (150,001 to 500,000 S.F.
9 @ 50'
ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT FROM EYE LEVEL ADJACENT TO ALL PUBLIC STREETS.
590' (591'-6")
L. BARBED, RAZOR, OR CONCERTINA WIRE (OR SIMILAR) SHALL NOT BE USED ON THIS SITE 448 CARS = 1/2,000 S.F.): 96 Spaces
WHERE VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC STREETS OR ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREAS. 329 CARS
M. ALL SIGNAGE REQUIRES A SEPARATE REVIEW AND PERMIT.
N. SMOKE, GAS AND ODOR EMISSIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH REGULATION III OF MARICOPA 30' DURANGO ST. Total Parking Required: 778 Spaces
COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL RULES AND REGULATIONS. DURANGO ST. 30'
O. THE DISPOSAL OF ALL WASTE MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH TITLE 9, CHAPTER 9, Parking Provided: 1,664 Spaces
ARTICLES 18 AND 4 OF HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATIONS AS ADOPTED BY THE ARIZONA
HEALTH DEPARTMENT. 30'
P. THE AVERAGE NOISE LEVEL, MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE, SHALL NOT EXCEED B.S.B 248'-4" Assessible Parking Required: 34 Spaces
FIFTY-FIVE dB (1 dn) WHEN MEASURED ON AN "A WEIGHTED" SOUND LEVEL METER AND
ACCORDING TO THE PROCEDURES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. 70' Assessible Parking Provided: 34 Spaces
Q. EXPLOSIVE OF HAZARDOUS PROCESSES (IF APPLICABLE): CERTIFICATION SHALL BE 37 @ 56'
PROVIDED BY PHOENIX FIRE DEPARTMENT PREVENTION BUREAU THAT ALL
12'
52'-8" 40' 120' 22' Proposed Building Height: 56 feet max.
MANUFACTURING, STORAGE AND WASTE PROCESSES ON THE SITE SHALL MEET SAFETY AND
70' 421'
ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS AS ADMINISTERED BY THE BUREAU.
R. ALL NEW SANITARY SEWER LINES WITHIN THE SITE SHALL BE PRIVATE PLUMBING LINES
HESS AVE.
SUBJECT TO THE PHOENIX PLUMBING CODE OR THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (ADEQ) AQUIFER PROTECTION PROGRAM (APP) GENERAL PERMIT 60' 190'
4.01 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARIZONA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE TITLE 18, CHAPTER 9, SECTION
40' 50 TRAILERS 40'
E301 (ACC R18-9-E301) WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE. 74 TRAILERS
40' 12'
S. THE SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM WITHIN THIS PROJECT WILL BE A PRIVATE
SYSTEM, OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER(S) OR ASSOCIATION. THE 26' 60'
20'
SYSTEM WILL BE REVIEWED AND INSPECTED BY THE BUILDING SAFETY SECTION OF THE Developer Architect
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT. B.S.B.
T. ALL ON-SITE WATER LINES, SHALL BE PRIVATE PLUMBING LINES SUBJECT TO THE PHOENIX
360' 66' 30' 40'
Property Reserve, Inc. Butler Design Group
404'-6" PUBLIC STREET 279'-4" 371'-6"
PLUMBING CODE. ROW 51 S. Main St. Suite 301 5013 E. Washington St. Ste 100
20'
40' 40' 26' Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Phoenix, Arizona 85034
20' B.S.B.
26' 40'
B.S.B. 91'-8"
143'-8" 91'-8" Contact: Luke Rothey Contact: Rick Butler
Ph: (801) 321-8723 Ph: (602) 957-1800
LS/RET
260' (261'-6") 260' (261'-6")
40'

260' (261'-6")
20'
40' 40' B.S.B. 518'
ROW ROW LS/RET
55'
FUTURE
93'-6" 72' ROW
10' 10'
20' 70' 60' 70' 60' 60' 60' 60' 70' W VAN BUREN ST
B.S.B. 30' 72' 200' 30' 200'
130'



WHYMAN AVE. BLDG. B BLDG. C BLDG. D
190,700 SF. 177,100 SF. 190,700 SF. HILTON AVE. SITE
728' (729'-6") 30'
W BUCKEYE ROAD
728' (729'-6") 51 TRAILERS 55 TRAILERS
71ST AVENUE 676' (677'-6") 67TH AVENUE

20'
B.S.B.
S 67TH AVE S 75TH AVE S 67TH AVE
SITE AREA:
Page 445
12.4 AC. 30'
B.S.B. W LOWER BUCKEYE ROAD


109'



W BROADWAY ROAD
70' 70'

OPEN
33' DATE SUBMISSION
SPACE
20'
LANDSCAPE BUFFER / LINEAR PARK / RET. EXISTING
101'-5" B.S.B. 122' 01-05-24 PRE-APPLICATION SITE PLAN
OPEN
SPACE




30'

OPEN
SPACE




NOT A PART
OPEN
OPEN SPACE/
RETENTION SPACE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
NOT A PART
HUGHES DR.


N N


MASTER SITE PLAN SITE PLAN
1" = 600'-0" 0 75' 150' 300'


SCALE: 1" = 150'



01.05.24
23047 ST-10




67TH AVENUE & LOWER BUCKEYE ROAD 5-
DSD KIVA # :
ZONING MAP
-0
Phoenix, Arizona 01

SDEV # :
PAPP # :
CP/GCP




Page 446




01-05-24
01-05-24




Page 447
01-05-24




Page 448
Nayeli Sanchez Luna

Subject: FW: Review & Comment on General Plan Amendment in the Estrella Village (GPA-ES-2-24-7)




From: mjb cartof.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 10:04 AM
To: Geno Koman
Cc: Nayeli Sanchez Luna ; Racelle Escolar ; Joshua
Bednarek
Subject: RE: Review & Comment on General Plan Amendment in the Estrella Village (GPA‐ES‐2‐24‐7)

I don’t understand why we are taking a parcel (116 acres!) that is largely designated residential (both GPA and
zoning) and is surrounded by residential on 3 sides, and turning it into CP. Seems like a bad idea to me. At best, a
portion of it could be CP, and the majority should be residential.

Marcia Busching
Planning Commission, Vice chair





Page 449
Nayeli Sanchez Luna

From: elisa tobias
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2024 9:39 PM
To: Nayeli Sanchez Luna
Subject: AGAINST REZONING TO INDUSTRIAL LAND

Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged



Hello I am a current resident within the community near 67th Ave and lower Buckeye. I am against
rezoning the land from single-family homes to industrial buildings. This community is growing and trying
to clean up the area. By rezoning industrial land we will only lose the traction we have made to make this
community better. If you are for our community, please will help us accomplish, single-family housing, or
even having it rezoned to commercial. Again I am against the land being rezoned to industrial building.
Thanks you for your time.

Elisa Tobias





Page 450
Nayeli Sanchez Luna

From: Sonja
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 10:47 AM
To: Nayeli Sanchez Luna
Subject: AGAINST REZONING TO INDUSTRIAL LAND - PreApp ZPA-139-23

Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged



Hello Ms. Sanchez:

I am a resident in the Tuscano Community in west Phoenix and want to make my voice heard in regards to
the proposed rezoning from single family housing land to industrial around 67th Avenue and Lower
Buckeye Road.

The area is already congested with many trucks and distribution centers. The logic of putting an industrial
center in the middle of residential neighborhoods shows the developers disregard for the community.

Zoning should stay for residential neighborhoods. The developers should locate and closer to Interstate 10
where land is already zonned for industrial.

If needed, I can be contacted by email. Thank you for your time.

Sonja Perry
3217 S. 77th LN
Phoenix, AZ 85043





Page 451
Nayeli Sanchez Luna

From: kevin perry
Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2024 6:56 AM
To: Nayeli Sanchez Luna
Subject: AGAINST REZONING TO INDUSTRIAL LAND - PreApp ZPA-139-23

Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged


Dear Ms. Sanchez:

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed rezoning of the area around 67th Avenue and Lower
Buckeye Road from single-family housing land to industrial use. As a resident of the Tuscano Community in west
Phoenix, I believe it is crucial to voice concerns about the potential negative impacts this rezoning could have on our
neighborhood.

The existing congestion in the area, primarily due to the presence of numerous trucks and distribution centers, already
poses challenges for residents in terms of traffic flow, noise pollution, and overall quality of life. Introducing an industrial
center in the midst of residential neighborhoods would only exacerbate these issues and demonstrate a disregard for the
well-being of the community.

Maintaining the current zoning for residential neighborhoods is essential for preserving the character and livability of our
community. Furthermore, I urge the developers to explore alternative locations, such as areas closer to Interstate 10
where industrial zoning is already established, rather than encroaching on residential areas.

I am deeply invested in the future of our community, and I believe that rezoning this area for industrial use would have far-
reaching consequences that must be carefully considered. I respectfully request that you take into account the concerns
of myself and other residents regarding this rezoning proposal.

Should you require any further information or wish to discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate to contact me via
email at robperkev7@yahoo. Thank you for your time and attention to this important issue.

Sincerely,

Kevin R. Perry
3217 S. 77th LN
Phoenix, AZ 85043





Page 452
ATTACHMENT C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-8-24-7

Date of VPC Meeting February 20, 2024
Request From RE-35 and R1-8
Request To CP/GCP
Proposal Flex commerce park general commerce park buildings
Location Approximately 1,170 feet north of the northwest corner
of 67th Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road
VPC Recommendation Denial
VPC Vote 7-1


VPC DISCUSSION:

Cases GPA-EST-2-24-7 and Z-8-24-7 are companion cases and were heard together.
Eight members of the public registered to speak.

Staff Presentation:

Nayeli Sanchez Luna, staff, presented an overview of the general plan amendment
and rezoning requests. Mrs. Sanchez Luna discussed the location of the stie, the
requested zoning designation, the surrounding land uses, and the proposed General
Plan Land Use Map designation. Mrs. Sanchez Luna displayed the site plan and
elevation and noted the proposed height, square footage, and architectural façade. Mrs.
Sanchez Luna concluded the presentation by providing the staff findings, the
recommendation, and summarizing the proposed stipulations.

Applicant Presentation:

Adam Baugh, representing the applicant with Withey Morris Baugh, PLC, provided an
overview of the proposed general plan amendment and rezone request. Mr. Baugh
displayed the conceptual site plan and noted the proximity to transportation corridors.
Mr. Baugh summarized the numerous changes to the site plan and noted the landscape
buffers when adjacent to single-family residential. Mr. Baugh noted other cities that had
commerce park buildings when adjacent to single-family residential and added that the
commerce park buildings increased property values. Mr. Baugh concluded the applicant
presentation by going over the outreach process and trip generation for the proposed
use.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 453
Estrella Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-8-24-7

Questions from the Committee:

Chair Lisa Perez asked if the applicant provided 50 letters of support on the same day
of the hearing. Mr. Baugh confirmed affirmatively. Chair Perez noted that the letters
were not in the committee packet and that she would have preferred to receive them
with more time to review them.

Public Comments:

Laura Martinez noted that she has seen the vacant property used as an illegal dumping
site. Ms. Martinez voiced her support for the proposal because it bring jobs to the area.

Francisca Montoya stated that she was involved with the Fowler School District and
was a former member of the Village Planning Committee. Ms. Montoya noted that
industrial uses were located primarily along Buckeye Road but that the subject property
was closer to Lower Buckeye Road. Ms. Montoya added that Lower Buckeye Road was
primarily surrounded by single-family residential development. Ms. Montoya stated that
the proposed use should be located along the Loop 202 and that the proposed SR-30
has not received funding for construction. Ms. Montoya concluded her comment by
stating that school buses would use the same route as the commercial traffic, thus
causing a safety hazard.

Lorena Cardenas voiced her support for the proposed development. Ms. Cardenas
noted that it would bring jobs to the community.

Nathan Wright, with the Community and Economic Development Department (CED),
noted that there was only one other possible 1,000,000 square foot building in the City.
Mr. Wright added that south of the I-10 there weren’t any large commerce park buildings
that could support large businesses. Mr. Wright also supported the smaller warehouses
because they could bring amenities to the area such as dance studios or offices. Mr.
Wright concluded his comment by stating that they could market the 1,000,000 square
foot building. Chair Perez asked for more clarification on why CED was speaking at a
committee meeting in favor of a rezoning case. Mr. Wright noted that this is an
important project and that the CED takes close interest in any projects that bring high
quality jobs. Chair Perez noted that CED spoke with her once and asked why the
Department hadn’t done more outreach. Mr. Wright noted that they were also present
at the Laveen Village Planning Committee and that they advocate for job generating
projects.

Chair Perez stated that in the past, the committee had asked the City how they were
promoting the area; however, they never received an answer. Mr. Wright suggested
returning to the committee to listen to the community’s needs and reviewing proposed
projects in the area. Mr. Wright reiterated that they support job generating projects.
Angelica Terrazas voiced her agreement and asked CED to return to the committee.
Chair Perez noted that the technological corridor along the Loop 202 is an example of a
marketable area promoted by the City. Mr. Wright agreed.


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 454
Estrella Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-8-24-7
Abby Dunton stated that she worked with numerous HOAs along Lower Buckeye
Road. Ms. Dunton stated that she supported keeping the area zoned for residential
development. Ms. Dunton noted that there were existing commercial uses that rely on
residential uses and concluded her comment by stating that she was in opposition of the
development.

Selina Lemley stated that she lived in the area for many years. Ms. Lemley stated that
she supported a use that would ensure jobs. Ms. Lemley added that a Walmart is
located down the street to serve the community and stated that she would like the area
to be developed.

Olga Pritchett asked for more information regarding public outreach and asked if they
went house to house or if they just sent out notification letters. Mr. Baugh noted that
they went door-to-door.

Ms. Terrazas noted that everyone in the committee has experienced traffic congestion
with limited exits on Lower Buckeye Road. Ms. Terrazas noted her traffic congestion
concerns and encouraged a through street to alleviate traffic from major roads.

Peter Mastro asked what type of business requires a million square foot building. Mr.
Wright noted that there is a need for warehousing and advance manufacturing in the
solar industry or semi-conductors.

Applicant Response:

Mr. Baugh noted that any development would generate traffic. Mr. Baugh stated that a
single-family subdivision would create more traffic than the proposed commerce park
development. Mr. Baugh added that single-family residential will add to traffic during
peak hours in the morning and in the afternoon. Mr. Baugh reiterated the need for this
type of development in the area.

Committee Discussion:

Dafra Joel Sanou asked how the developer would dictate who leases the buildings. Mr.
Baugh stated that numerous uses could be used within the buildings including car
restoration or indoor entertainment for children and adults. Mr. Baugh reiterated that
there were many uses that could come into the building to add amenities to the area.
Mr. Baugh stated that they would ensure someone that would be there for a long time.

Co-Vice Chair Ceniceros asked how much additional pollution this would add to the
community. Mr. Baugh noted that he could not quantify pollution. Mr. Baugh stated that
the proposal included numerous stipulations to try to alleviate pollution and water
conservation.

Renee Dominguez stated that traffic on 67th Avenue is horrible and noted that
semitrailer and commercial traffic will further add to the existing traffic congestion
problem in the area. Ms. Dominguez stated that areas with a mixture of commerce park
and residential development have a lot of traffic congestion and safety issues. Mr.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 455
Estrella Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-8-24-7
Baugh noted that residential uses would create more congestion and that an accident
would create traffic congestion anywhere in the City.

Andre Serrette stated that he agreed that the village was very diverse when it came to
uses but wondered if this was the only place in the village that could accommodate the
proposed development. Mr. Baugh noted that they are developing to what the market
demands. Mr. Baugh added that there wasn’t a 1,000,000 square foot building in the
City and the smaller buildings could easily be leased out.

Melanie Burd asked about the traffic light at 67th Avenue and Durango. Mr. Baugh
displayed the location of the purposed traffic lights. Ms. Burd asked if the site will have
access via 71st Avenue or 67th Avenue. Mr. Baugh stated that access will be via 67th
Avenue. Ms. Burd stated that there should be an additional lane on 71st Avenue and
Lower Buckeye Road. Mr. Baugh noted that a traffic study would be required to analyze
the number of lanes. Ms. Burd asked if the proposed buildings could be used for a bar.
Mr. Baugh noted that that would not be allowed.

Ms. Burd asked if there was parking on the east side of the building. Mr. Baugh stated
that that would be employee parking. Ms. Burd voiced her concern for traffic along 71st
Avenue.

Chair Perez stated that she has met with numerous developers for this site and that
they always proposed commerce park or industrial uses. Chair Perez noted that the
south portion of the site was recently zoned to allow multifamily residential, and that the
representative did extensive outreach to the community. Chair Perez stated that this
representative only held one community meeting and that they did not present a
narrative of the project but rather just asked if the community had questions. Chair
Perez added that the committee has a right to comment on proposed warehouses and
commerce park buildings in the area. Chair Perez stated that there is a housing
shortage in the City but the proposal does not support additional housing. Chair Perez
stated that all these buildings are conceptual because there are no purposed tenants for
the buildings. Chair Perez voiced her concerns regarding the square footage,
employment parking and commercial parking. Chair Perez stated that she would like to
see more public outreach and more meetings with CED. Mr. Baugh noted that during
the public meeting, there were a few members that lived in close proximity to the
proposal and that the rest were part of the school district. Chair Perez added that
school employees would be directly affected by the development. Mr. Baugh stated that
they consider additional meetings based on the first public meeting. Mr. Baugh added
that they had contacted the district for a meeting. Chair Perez noted that this
development would impact a whole area of people other than those adjacent to the
development. Mr. Baugh noted that the number of people at the first meeting will
indicate if more meetings were needed. Mr. Baugh added that only two members of the
immediate area attended the meeting.

Ms. Dominguez stated that many property owners do not receive notification letters.
Ms. Dominguez added that there is a future school location and there is a nearby school
so extensive outreach would have been beneficial. Ms. Dominguez asked how many
houses were knocked on when the applicant went door-to-door. Mr. Baugh noted that
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 456
Estrella Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-8-24-7
the door-to-door method exceeded what was required by the rezoning process. Ms.
Dominguez asked why they waited the weekend before the meeting to go door-to-door
and not allow the committee to review all the letters of support. Mr. Baugh noted that
they had a neighborhood meeting at the end of January.

Co-Vice Chair Ceniceros asked if the applicant was willing to continue to work with the
committee before a recommendation. Mr. Baugh voiced his agreement but stated that
they would like the case to move forward. Mr. Baugh added that he could hold a
meeting before Planning Commission.

Motion:
Co-Vice Chair Markus Ceniceros motioned to recommend the denial of Z-8-24-7.
Melanie Burd seconded the motion.

Vote:
7-1, Motion passed with Committee Members Ayala, Burd, Dominguez, Sanou,
Serrette, Ceniceros, and Perez in favor and Committee Member Terrazas in opposition.

Staff comments regarding VPC Recommendation:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 457
ATTACHMENT D


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
March 7, 2024

ITEM NO: 10
DISTRICT NO.: 7
SUBJECT:

Application #: Z-8-24-7 (Companion Case GPA-EST-2-24-7)
Location: Approximately 1,170 feet north of the northwest corner of 67th Avenue
and Lower Buckeye Road
From: RE-35 and R1-8
To: CP/GCP
Acreage: 112.32
Proposal: Flex commerce park general commerce park buildings
Applicant: Stephanie Watney, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC
Owner: Brett Hopper, Property Reserve Arizona, LLC
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Estrella 2/20/2024 Denial. Vote: 7-1.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the staff recommendation.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Commissioner Mangum made a MOTION to approve Z-8-24-7, per the staff
recommendation.

Maker: Mangum
Second: Hu
Vote: 6-2 (Jaramillo, Perez)
Absent: Busching
Opposition Present: Yes

Findings:

1. The proposal is compatible with the proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation
and will provide employment opportunities within the Estrella Village.

2. The proposal contains enhanced standards that will result in a more walkable,
shaded and pedestrian-friendly environment. The proposal will provide increased shade
which will help to reduce the urban heat island effect.

3. As stipulated, the proposed development will include development and design
standards, such as enhanced streetscapes, landscape buffer and planting standards, to
mitigate impacts to the surrounding properties.




Page 458
Stipulations:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the elevations date stamped
January 8, 2024, as modified by the following stipulations and approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

2. One outdoor employee resting area of no less than 400 square feet, or two 200-square
foot areas shall be provided on site. Each required pedestrian area shall include a
minimum of two pedestrian seating benches, constructed of quality and durable
materials, and shaded to a minimum of 75% using minimum 2-inch caliper, large
canopy, drought-tolerant, shade trees, and/or architectural shade, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

3. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be constructed
of decorative pavers, stamped, or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments that
visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

4. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided per the requirements of Section 1307.H of
the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance through inverted U and/or artistic racks located near the
office and installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance. Artistic racks shall adhere to the City of Phoenix Preferred Designs in
Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.

5. A minimum 100-foot landscape setback shall be provided along the south perimeter of
the site.

6. Landscape areas and surface retention areas shall be planted with minimum 2-inch
caliper, large canopy, drought-tolerant, shade trees planted 25 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

7. A minimum of 10% of the required shrubs, shall be a milkweed or other native nectar
species, and shall be planted in groups of three or more, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

8. A minimum of 25% of the surface parking areas shall be shaded, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department. Shade may be achieved by structures or by
minimum 2-inch caliper, drought tolerant, shade trees, or a combination thereof.

9. Only landscape materials listed in the Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-
Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List shall be utilized internal to the site, as approved, or
modified by the Planning and Development Department

10. Landscaping shall be maintained by permanent and automatic/water efficient
WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers (or similar smart controller) to minimize
maintenance and irrigation water consumption for all on and offsite landscape
irrigation.

11. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that demonstrates a
commitment to participate in the City of Phoenix Business Water Efficiency Program
for a minimum of 10 years, or as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.



Page 459
12. A minimum of two green infrastructure (GI) techniques for stormwater management
shall be implemented per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure and Low-
Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater Management, as approved, or
modified by the Planning and Development Department.

13. The development shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping
Program landscape palette and landscaping standards along arterial streets in the
Estrella Village, except as otherwise noted herein, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

14. A minimum of 10% of the required parking spaces shall be EV Installed.

15. A bus stop pad shall be constructed on southbound 67th Avenue, located from
Durango Street according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258. The bus stop pad
shall be designed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1260 with a depth of
10 feet, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

16. A minimum 55-feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the west half of 67th Avenue,
adjacent to the development.

17. Improvements to 67th Avenue shall be consistent with the Arterial CM cross-section,
consisting of a 14-foot raised center median and a minimum 6-foot-wide detached
sidewalk separated by a minimum 10-foot-wide landscape area, adjacent to the
development. The landscape strip shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, single
trunk, drought-tolerant, shade trees to provide a minimum of 75% shade, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the
developer shall work with the Planning and Development Department on alternative
design solutions consistent with a pedestrian environment.

18. A minimum 60-feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the full width of Durango
Street, adjacent to the development. The right-of-way shall align with the existing
Durango Street connections on the eastern and western boundaries of the site.

19. A minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum 5-foot-wide
landscape area shall be constructed on both sides of Durango Street, adjacent to the
development. The landscape strip shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, single
trunk, drought-tolerant, shade trees to provide a minimum of 75% shade, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the
developer shall work with the Planning and Development Department on alternative
design solutions consistent with a pedestrian environment.

20. A minimum 30-feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the east half of 71st Avenue,
adjacent to the development.

21. A minimum 1-foot Vehicular Non-Access Easement shall be dedicated along the
western property line (adjacent to 71st Avenue), south of the existing Durango Street
alignment.

22. A minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum 5-foot-wide
landscape area shall be constructed on the east side of 71st Avenue, adjacent to the
development. The landscape strip shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, single
trunk, drought-tolerant, shade trees to provide a minimum of 75% shade, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the


Page 460
developer shall work with the Planning and Development Department on alternative
design solutions consistent with a pedestrian environment.

23. A traffic signal shall be installed at 67th Avenue and Durango Street. The developer
shall fund 100% of the cost and install the traffic signal at the intersection, as approved
by the Street Transportation Department.

24. All existing electrical utilities within the public right-of-way shall be undergrounded,
adjacent to the development. The developer shall coordinate with the affected utility
companies for their review and permitting.

25. Existing SRP facilities along all public streets are to be relocated outside of city right-
of-way, unless otherwise approved by the Street Transportation Department. Contact
SRP to identify existing land rights and establish the appropriate process to relocate
the facility.

26. Replace unused driveways with sidewalk and curb and gutter. Also, replace any
broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps on all streets and upgrade all
off-site improvements to be in compliance with current ADA guidelines.

27. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with paving,
curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping, and other
incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and Development Department. All
improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

28. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

29. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207 waiver
of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County Recorder's
Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application file for record.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact Teleia
Galaviz at 602-291-2559, teleia.galaviz@phoenix.gov, TTY: Use 7-1-1.




Page 461
ATTACHMENT E


To Whom it May Concern,


I SUPPORT the Property Reserve Inc. park development project located on 116.5 acres north of
the northwest corner of 67th Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road in Phoenix. We support this
high-quality proposal, including the rezoning and general amendment plan (z-3- 84 and
GPA-EST-2-24).


The existing zoning for the Property has been carried over from the time of annexation into the
The proposal request facilitating development of current property to create a high-quality
speculative commerce park development which would include 4 flex buildings with a cumulative
space of 1.8 million square feet of shell warehouse space. These flex buildings will be divided to
accommodate smaller tenants' suites, this would address the dynamic need for small and larger
tenant and employer spaces. Consistent to CP/GCP regulations, the maximum height for each
building is set at 56 feet tall.
The design of the buildings is eye-catching and includes large windows along with a mint green
entryway that welcomes you to the property along with the mesquite trees and cacti surrounding
the lot. In addition, the proposal is to provide the area with new, high quality employment
opportunities in a way which is consistent and mindful of the area's land use pattern. This will
provide the area with more employment and business opportunities along with the ability to
create space for warehouses which are common in the area.
I am in full support of the Property Reserve Inc. project and am excited to see this
development revitalize the neighborhood and surrounding area with multiple opportunities.




SIGNATURE----=�'--- --�-------




PHONE



EMAIL




Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Page 474
Page 475
Page 476
Page 477
Page 478
Page 479
Page 480
Page 481
Page 482
Page 483
Page 484
Page 485
Page 486
Page 487
Page 488
Page 489
Page 490
Page 491
Page 492
Page 493
Page 494
Page 495
Page 496
Page 497
Page 498
Page 499
Page 500
Page 501
Page 502
Page 503
Page 504
Page 505
Page 506
Page 507
Page 508
Page 509
Page 510
Page 511
ATTACHMENT F

Opposition to Z-8-24-7

February 15, 2024
Dear Estrella Village Planning Committee
and Planning Commission,
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the request from Property Reserve
Arizona, LLC to rezone 112.32 acres located approximately 1,170 feet north of the
northwest corner of 67th Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road from RE-35 and R1-8 to
CP/GCP. I am concerned about the negative impacts of the proposed flex commerce
park general commerce park buildings on the surrounding area
My reasons for opposition are as follows:

● The proposed rezoning is incompatible with the existing and planned land uses in
the vicinity. The subject site is mostly designated as Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre on the General Plan Land Use Map, which reflects the
predominant character of the area. The proposed CP/GCP zoning would allow
industrial and commercial uses that are more intensive and intrusive than the
current and future residential uses. The proposed rezoning would also require a
General Plan Land Use Map amendment, which would undermine the public
input and vision that went into the creation of the General Plan.
● The proposed rezoning would adversely affect the traffic, safety, and quality of
life of the nearby residents. The proposed flex commerce park general
commerce park buildings would generate a significant amount of traffic, noise,
light, and air pollution, especially from the large warehouse building north of the
street. The traffic would worsen the already congested conditions on 67th
Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road, and create safety hazards for pedestrians,
bicyclists, and school children. The noise, light, and air pollution would disturb the
peace and tranquility of the adjacent neighborhoods, and would adverse impact
the health of the residents, especially our most vulnerable populations.
● The proposed rezoning would conflict with the goals and policies of the Estrella
Village Core Plan and the Estrella Village Arterial Life Cycle Program. The
Estrella Village Core Plan aims to preserve and enhance the existing residential
areas, promote compatible and quality development, and foster a sense of
community and identity. The Estrella Village Arterial Life Cycle Program seeks to
improve the appearance, function, and safety of the arterial streets, and create
attractive and pedestrian-friendly corridors. The proposed rezoning would
contradict these objectives by introducing incompatible and low-quality
development, eroding the community and identity of the area, and degrading the
appearance, function, and safety of the arterial streets.
● The proposed rezoning would disregard the staff’s recommendation of not
conforming to the site plan due to the Durango Street alignment. The Durango
Street alignment is a critical component of the Estrella Village Arterial Life Cycle
Program, which aims to improve the connectivity and mobility of the area. The
proposed public street would interfere with the Durango Street alignment and
create confusion and inefficiency for the traffic flow and access. The proposed
rezoning would also ignore the staff’s recommendation of providing shaded



Page 512
employee resting areas, which are essential for the health and comfort of the
workers in the hot and arid climate of Phoenix.
● The proposed rezoning would violate the Estrella Village Plan’s goals and
objectives of orderly growth, identifiable village core, strong residential
neighborhoods, variety of homes and jobs, and consistent streetscapes and trail
linkages. The proposed CP/GCP zoning would allow industrial and commercial
uses that are out of scale and character with the existing and planned residential
uses in the vicinity.
● Approval of the proposed rezoning would also undermine the identity and
cohesion of the Estrella Village by introducing a large and incompatible
development that would dominate the landscape and create visual and physical
barriers. The proposed rezoning would also fail to provide a variety of homes and
jobs that would meet the diverse needs and preferences of the residents and
workers in the area.

For these reasons, I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning and the associated
General Plan Land Use Map amendment. I believe that the subject site should remain
as RE-35 and R1-8, and be developed in a manner that is consistent and compatible
with the surrounding residential uses and the General Plan. I appreciate your service
and attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Dan Penton
8216 S 42nd Ave
Phoenix, AZ 85339




Page 513
Nayeli Sanchez Luna

From: Maria Martinez
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2024 8:42 PM
To: Nayeli Sanchez Luna
Subject: Against rezoning

Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged


Hi Nayeli Sanchez

I hope my voice is heard as a resident of west phoenix. We are tired of these industrial buildings. Please stop the
proposed rezoning and prioritize your residents. Thank you


- Maria Martinez





Page 514
Nayeli Sanchez Luna

From: Matteo Martinez-Lainez
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2024 8:52 PM
To: Nayeli Sanchez Luna
Subject: Against Rezoning

Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged


Hi Nayeli Sanchez

I hope my voice is heard as a long time resident of the west phoenix. We are TIRED of these industrial buildings, the
constant construction delays, AND these semi trucks. Please stop the proposed rezoning, start prioritize your residents
and start FIXING/EXPANDING our roads first!

Sincerely,
A very tried resident, Matteo Martinez



Get Outlook for iOS [aka.ms]





Page 515
Page 516
Page 517



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing and Resolution Adoption - General Plan Amendment GPA-DV-1-
23-3 - Approximately 1,200 Feet East and 360 Feet North of the Northeast Corner
of 19th Avenue and Tierra Buena Lane (Resolution 22189)

Request to hold a public hearing on a General Plan Amendment for the following item
to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and the related resolution if
approved. Request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map designation on 18.97
acres from Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre to Mixed Use (Commercial /
Commerce/Business Park). This is a companion case to Z-31-23-3 and should be
heard first, followed by Z-31-23-3.

Summary
Application: GPA-DV-1-23-3
Current Designation: Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre
Requested Designation: Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce/Business Park)
Acreage: 18.97
Proposed Use: Office/Commerce Park

Owner/Applicant: Jerry Simms, TP Racing, LLLP
Representative: Paul E. Gilbert, Gilbert Blilie, PLLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval.
VPC Action: The Deer Valley Village Planning Committee heard this item on Aug. 10,
2023, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 8-4.
PC Action: The Planning Commission continued this item on Sept. 7, 2023, Nov. 2,
2023, and Dec. 7, 2023. The Planning Commission heard this item on March 7, 2024,
and recommended approval, per the Deer Valley Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 8-0.

Location
Approximately 1,200 feet east and 360 feet north of the northeast corner of 19th
Avenue and Tierra Buena Lane
Council District: 3
Parcel Address: 16846 N. 11th Ave.; 1445, 1475, and 1501 W. Bell Road; and 1722 W.
Tierra Buena Lane


Page 518


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 519
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION



RESOLUTION


A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2015
GENERAL PLAN FOR PHOENIX, APPLICATION GPA-DV-1-23-3,
CHANGING THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FOR THE
PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The 2015 Phoenix General Plan, which was adopted by

Resolution 21307, is hereby amended by adopting GPA-DV-1-23-3. The 18.97 acres

of property located approximately 1,200 feet east and 360 feet north of the northeast

corner of 19th Avenue and Tierra Buena Lane is designated as Mixed Use

(Commercial / Commerce/Business Park).

SECTON 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the 2015 Phoenix General Plan to reflect this land use classification change as

shown below:




Page 520
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 3rd day of April, 2024.



MAYOR




ATTEST:


____________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk




APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney




Page 521
By:___________________________
___________________________



REVIEWED BY:


______________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




Page 522
ATTACHMENT B




GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS
*REVISED
August 3, 2023

Application: GPA-DV-1-23-3

Owner: TP Racing, LLLP

Applicant: CT Investors

Representative: Paul E. Gilbert, Beus Gilbert McGroder, PLLC

Location: Approximately 1,200 feet east and 360 feet north of
the northeast corner of 19th Avenue and Tierra
Buena Lane

Acreage: 18.97 acres

Current Plan Designation: Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre (18.97
acres)

Requested Plan Designation: Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce/Business
Park) (18.97 acres)

Reason for Requested Change: Minor General Plan Amendment to allow
office/commerce park.

Deer Valley Village Planning
Committee Date Meeting Date: August 10, 2023

Staff Recommendation: Approval

FINDINGS:

1) The subject site is also part of a rezoning request which exceeds 10 acres and is
not consistent with the current General Plan Land Use Map designation,
therefore a minor General Plan Amendment to the Land Use Map is required.




Page 523
Staff Analysis
GPA-DV-1-23-3
Page 2


2) The proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation of Mixed Use
(Commercial / Commerce/Business Park) is compatible with adjacent
designations to the north and west.

3) The companion Rezoning Case Z-31-23-3, as stipulated, includes standards that
ensure an appropriate transition in design from the proposed use to the
surrounding properties.

BACKGROUND

The subject site is 18.97 acres and is located approximately 1,200 feet east and 360
feet north of the northeast corner of 19th Avenue and Tierra Buena Lane. The subject
site is largely occupied with stables and mobile homes associated with the horse
racetrack activities of Turf Paradise. The companion rezoning case Z-31-23-3 is
requesting to rezone the subject site from S-1 SP (Ranch or Farm Residence, Special
Permit) and C-2 SP (Intermediate Commercial, Special Permit) to CP/GCP (Commerce
Park District/General Commerce Park Option) to allow commerce park uses. The
General Plan Land Use Map designation of the subject site is Residential 2 to 5 dwelling
units per acre. The proposed General Plan Amendment is to designate the site as
Mixed Use (Commerce / Commerce/Business Park).

SURROUNDING LAND USES

NORTH
North of the subject site is a horse racetrack and ancillary uses zoned S-1 SP
(Approved C-2 SP) (Ranch or Farm Residence, Special Permit, Approved Intermediate
Commercial, Special Permit) or CP/BP (Commerce Park District/Business Park Option)
and approved CP/GCP (Commerce Park District/General Commerce Park Option).This
area is designated as Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce/Business Park) on the
General Plan Land Use map.

SOUTH
South of the subject site is a former mobile home park which is vacant zoned C-2 SP
(Intermediate Commercial, Special Permit) and S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence). This
area is designated as Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre on the General Plan
Land Use map.

EAST
East of the subject site is vacant land zoned S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence). This area
is designated as Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre on the General Plan Land
Use map.

WEST
West of the subject site are ancillary uses associated with the horse racetrack zoned S-
1 SP (Approved C-2 SP or CP/BP) (Ranch or Farm Residence, Special Permit,



Page 524
Staff Analysis
GPA-DV-1-23-3
Page 3


Approved Intermediate Commercial, Special Permit, or Commerce Park
District/Business Park Option). This area is designated as Mixed Use (Commercial /
Commerce/Business Park) on the General Plan Land Use map.




Proposed General Plan Land Use Map, Source: City of Phoenix

RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN CORE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES

CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES
• OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE: Support reasonable levels of increased
intensity, respectful of local conditions and surrounding neighborhoods.

The proposed minor General Plan Amendment, along with the companion
rezoning case, Z-31-23-3, would allow redevelopment of an underused site into a
commerce park development that is compatible with the development planned in
the area and respectful of local conditions by providing enhanced landscaping
and detached sidewalks around the subject site.

STRENGTHEN OUR LOCAL ECONOMY CORE VALUE
• JOB CREATION (EMPLOYERS); LAND USE: Support General Plan Land
Use Map and zoning changes that will facilitate the location of employment
generating uses in each of the designated employment centers.




Page 525
Staff Analysis
GPA-DV-1-23-3
Page 4


* A portion of the subject site is within the North I-17 Major Employment Center
and is compatible with the planned development on the remainder of the Turf
Paradise site. The proposal will allow for an underutilized property to be
redeveloped for employment generating uses within the North I-17 Major
Employment Center.

CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS
• CERTAINTY AND CHARACTER; LAND USE: Locate land uses with the
greatest height and most intense uses within limits based on village
character, land use needs, infrastructure and transportation system
capacity.

The proposal will allow for the redevelopment of the site into commerce park
uses (per companion Rezoning Case Z-31-23-3) which is consistent with the
surrounding zoning of the larger Turf Paradise site and in close proximity to two
major arterial streets, 19th Avenue and Bell Road.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends approval of GPA-DV-1-23-3. The land use map designation, as
requested, would further diversify land uses in this part of the Deer Valley Village in a
manner consistent with development patterns, existing zoning and General Plan Land
Use Map designations in the general area. Furthermore, the requested land use map
designation and companion rezoning case will allow for compatible land uses that will
provide employment opportunities in the Deer Valley Village.

Writer
Matteo Moric
August 3, 2023

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
Sketch Maps (2 pages)
Correspondence (2 pages)




Page 526
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003 X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-DV-1-23-3 ACRES: +/- 18.97 REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Deer Valley COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3
APPLICANT: CT Investors c/o James Watson
EXISTING:
Residential 2 to 5 du/ac ( 18.97 +/- Acres)


Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 5 du/ac
Residential 5 to 10 du/ac
Residential 5 to 15 du/ac
Parks/Open Space -
Publicly Owned
Mixed Use (Commercial /
Commerce / Business Park)
4TH ST

CAVE
3RD ST
2ND ST CREE
1ST ST K SHO
RE
TIERRA BUENA LN



PROPOSED CHANGE:
Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce / Business Park) ( 18.97 +/- Acres)


Proposed Change Area
Mixed Use (Commercial /
Commerce / Business Park)




4TH ST

CAVE
3RD ST
2ND ST CREE
1ST ST K SHO
RE
TIERRA BUENA LN

Page 527
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003 X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-DV-1-23-3_BW ACRES: +/- 18.97 REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Deer Valley COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3
APPLICANT: CT Investors c/o James Watson
EXISTING:
Residential 2 to 5 du/ac ( 18.97 +/- Acres)


Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 5 du/acre
Residential 5 to 10 du/acre
Residential 5 to 15 du/acre
E E E E E
E E E E E
Parks/Open Space -
E E E E E
E E E E E
Publicly Owned
Mixed Use (Commercial /
Commerce / Business Park)
4TH ST

CAVE
3RD ST
2ND ST CREE
1ST ST K SHO
RE
TIERRA BUENA LN



PROPOSED CHANGE:
Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce / Business Park) ( 18.97 +/- Acres)


Proposed Change Area
Mixed Use (Commercial /
Commerce / Business Park)




4TH ST

CAVE
3RD ST
2ND ST CREE
1ST ST K SHO
RE
TIERRA BUENA LN

Page 528
Matteo Moric

Subject: FW: Review & Comment on General Plan Amendment in the Deer Valley Village (GPA-DV-1-23-3)
Attachments: GPA-DV-1-23-3.pdf



From: mjb cartof.com
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2023 12:08 PM
To: Matteo Moric
Subject: FW: Review & Comment on General Plan Amendment in the Deer Valley Village (GPA‐DV‐1‐23‐3)

Dear Matteo—
I have reviewed the proposed GPA change and feel that it is inappropriate for the area. In the “Applicant
Analysis Questions” the Applicant failed to directly answer Questions 2 and 3—two very key questions.
The subject property is bordered on 2 sides by residential, and is not on a main street. The property to the
north should provide sufficient additional commerce park property for the area, without the need for a GPA.
With the need for housing in the City, there is no justifiable reason to amend the GPA/rezone to do anything
other than make it the 2‐3.5 du/acre ad 3.5‐5 du/ac that it was designated.

Marcia Busching, Planning Commission member

From: Geno Koman [mailto:geno.koman@phoenix.gov]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2023 9:45 AM
Subject: Review & Comment on General Plan Amendment in the Deer Valley Village (GPA‐DV‐1‐23‐3)

Attached for your review is an amendment to the General Plan for Phoenix that has been filed:

DEER VALLEY VILLAGE
Application GPA-DV-1-23-3 at approximately 500 feet east of the northeast corner of 19th Avenue and
Tierra Buena Lane. Request for a Map Amendment to change the General Plan land use designation
on approximately 27.2 acres from Residential 2 to 3.5 du/acre and Residential 3.5 to 5 du/acre to
Mixed Use, Commercial and Commerce Park / Business Park to allow office commerce park.

This application is proceeding concurrently with a rezoning request (Z-31-23-3) for the same property,
approximately 28 acres from S-1 to CP / GCP to allow commerce park.

Please forward your comments prior to June 29, 2023 to:

Matteo Moric
Village Planner
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85003-1611
602-261-8235
matteo.moric@phoenix.gov

Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact the Planning & Development Department
at 602-262-7811.



Page 529
Thank you,

Geno Koman
Secretary II
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
Phone: 602-495-2076
geno.koman@phoenix.gov





Page 530
ATTACHMENT C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-DV-1-23-3



Date of VPC Meeting August 10, 2023
Request From Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre
Request To Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce/Business Park)
Proposal Office/commerce park
Location Approximately 1,200 feet east and 360 feet north of the
northeast corner of 19th Avenue and Tierra Buena Lane
VPC Recommendation Approval
VPC Vote 8-4

Item No. 6 (GPA-DV-1-23-3) and Item No. 7 (Z-31-23-3) are companion cases and were
heard together.

Six members of the public registered to speak on this item, in opposition.

VPC DISCUSSION:

Matteo Moric, staff, noted that Case GPA-DV-1-23-3 would be heard at the same time
as Case Z-31-23-3, but would require two separate motions. Mr. Moric provided an
overview and identified where the site was located, the site size and the requests. Mr.
Moric noted a general plan amendment was required and there would be no stipulations
associated with the general plan land use change request. Mr. Moric described the
surrounding zoning, uses and general plan land use designation and showed the
renderings and conceptual plan. Mr. Moric noted there was one letter of opposition for
the general plan request and identified the staff findings and stipulations.

Keith Greenberg stated a concern with the milkweed specifically stipulated as he felt it
was an invasive plant which could take up a lot of space. Mr. Moric, staff, and Sandra
Hoffman provided additional information on the milkweed plant and the monarch
butterfly pledge.

APPLICANT PRESENTATION

Paul Gilbert with Beus, Gilbert, McGroder, LLC, introduced himself as representing CT
Realty who had a majority of the Turf Paradise property under contract and were
currently doing their due diligence. Mr. Gilbert explained that 85% of the overall Turf

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 531
Deer Valley Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-DV-1-23-3
August 10, 2023
Page 2


Paradise property was already zoned and tonight was a rezone of the small piece of the
property of approximately 28 acres. Mr. Gilbert shared the zoning history as he was the
attorney who represented the Turf Paradise property owner in 2002. Mr. Gilbert said a
majority of the property was zoned S-1 but in 2002, the applicant rezoned the property
but did not vest the property. Mr. Gilbert added that in 2002 Turf Paradise was able to
operate with the Special Permit overlay. Mr. Gilbert noted the zoning would change
upon processing a site plan, but they were not doing that, and they needed to wrap up
the zoning to decide if his client wanted to move forward with the purchase. Mr. Gilbert
described the zoning of the majority of the Turf Paradise property, which is approved
but not vested, and said the property on the west side was zoned for a combination C-2
(Intermediate Commercial) or CP/BP (Commerce Park/Business Park Option). Mr.
Gilbert noted the C-2 allows for all types of retail and services and the CP/BP would
allow employment, warehouse distribution, along with light manufacturing and
assembly. Mr. Gilbert added the east side was zoned CP/GCP (Commerce
Park/General Commerce Park Option) and said this option allows a little more flexibility.

Mr. Gilbert said the subject of the zoning request was for the 28 acre portion and did
not know why the land was not rezoned from S-1 in 2002. Now, Mr. Gilbert said they
wanted it to be CP/GCP to be commensurate with the bulk of the Turf Paradise site. Mr.
Gilbert said this was a conceptual site plan and they were not ready to create a final site
plan. Mr. Gilbert added that the conceptual site plan showed the uses that could go in a
commerce park, and they were going to use commercial retail option on the small
portion that fronts Bell Road at the intersection of 15th Avenue. Mr. Gilbert noted they
wanted to keep the grandstand structure of Turf Paradise and continue the off-track
racing. He said they’d continue with the off-track betting but not live horse racing. The
parking and grandstand would remain; however, the horse track and racing would go.

Mr. Gilbert added that in addition to the rezoning request a general plan amendment
was required to change about 14 acres of the property. Mr. Gilbert said approximately
half the 28 acres had the correct general plan land use designation.

Mr. Gilbert shared their public outreach efforts and said they presented their case
virtually to every neighborhood association in the area. He explained how they utilized
the entire boundary of Turf Paradise rather than the 28 acres which was 6 or 7 times
more people required to contact.

Mr. Gilbert said there was a strong staff recommendation and strong encouragement
from the Economic Development Department. Mr. Gilbert read the staff findings and
emphasized a portion of the site was within the I-17 Major Employment Corridor. Mr.
Gilbert said they agreed with all the stipulations except one minor exception with
stipulation number 11 which states vehicular access shall not be permitted on Tierra
Buena Lane. Mr. Gilbert said there was good reason for the stipulation as Tierra Buena
Lane was a residential street and requested the stipulation to be modified to say
vehicular access shall not be permitted on Tierra Buena Lane as long as the applicable
roadway is classified as a residential road.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 532
Deer Valley Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-DV-1-23-3
August 10, 2023
Page 3



QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE

Trilese DiLeo questioned how much of the property the escrow was addressing to
which Mr. Gilbert replied that it was for the entire Turf Paradise property.

Ms. DiLeo inquired about the history of the zoning and why the zoning was not for the
entire property since Turf Paradise existed in 2002. Mr. Gilbert said he could not
remember all the history of why that was other than staff pointed him in that direction at
the time. Mr. Gilbert indicated staff wanted to control the site plan as they had no uses
for that part of the site at that time.

Ms. DiLeo asked why it was not being rezoned to residential due to the housing
demand. Mr. Gilbert said there was a need for both housing and employment and they
spent a significant amount of time with Economic Development Department and stated
the site would be much more conducive to commerce park uses.

Braden Lopez-Biggs inquired about the amount of property in the S-1 zoning and if
there was any intention to build housing on that portion. Mr. Lopez-Biggs also wanted
clarity on stipulation No. 11 and wanted to know how it could be classified as a non-
residential street.

Mr. Gilbert stated the C-2 allows building multifamily. Mr. Gilbert also noted that they
were welcome to add a stipulation to come to the Village Planning Committee with a site
plan in the future.

Will Novak questioned if there was a study on how much property tax the property
generated as is versus the amount after it is developed. Mr. Novak asked if a user was
lined up and if there was a phasing plan.

Mr. Gilbert mentioned that there was no phasing plan developed yet.

Mr. Novak also asked if they thought about the grandstand getting historic preservation
designation. Mr. Gilbert said he was not sure as they had never been asked the
question with his client.

Ms. Hoffman asked if there was a traffic analysis. Mr. Gilbert said a traffic study was
required for the entire project when they come in to do the site plan. Ms. Hoffman stated
the plan was quite conceptual and it may be premature to move forward. Ms. Hoffman
asked if they’d come back with more details.

Mr. Gilbert said they’d comply with the Zoning Ordinance for setbacks and height. And
Mr. Gilbert said he was keenly aware this was a major development as approximately
250 acres. He said if they’d want more details later he’d come back when its time for the
site plan.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 533
Deer Valley Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-DV-1-23-3
August 10, 2023
Page 4



Trilese DiLeo believed modifying stipulation no. 11 would not work. She felt the entire
mobile home park and residents down the road would be impacted.

Public Comments

Stephan H. Nolan said he lived in the area for many years and has been in the horse
race business. Mr. Nolan said that the acting general manager of the property does not
know if the property sale will be complete. Mr. Nolan said he was concerned with car
accidents and traffic. Mr. Nolan wanted this at least postponed to October to decide if
the owner of the horse race business wanted to go through. He noted that there was
litigation of the property and expressed concerns about the current owners previous
motivation to sell and there was a concern if the sale would even go through. Mr. Nolan
wanted the issue to be tabled and indicated the horse race industry employees felt the
meeting was strategic so there would not be opposition.

Chairman Grossman informed Mr. Nolan that his 3 minute time had expired. Ms.
DiLeo stated she wanted to continue to listen to Mr. Nolan’s comments. Mr. Lopez-
Biggs noted that if they allow Mr. Nolan to exceed 3 minutes they would need to allow
all members of the community to do so.

Chairman Grossman stated he would allow Mr. Nolan to continue his remarks yet
adhere to the 3 minute time line unless he feels it is appropriate to extend.

Mr. Nolan noted that this is an agricultural entertainment industry that would impact
many people’s livelihoods.

Ms. DiLeo asked about the amount of money horse racing brings to the region
economically. Mr. Nolan responded that there was a lot of money brought into the state
and felt this site needed to remain horse racing.

Cynthia George shared her ties to the community and said she was a horse racing
professional. Ms. George said Turf Paradise supports many self-supportive businesses
and the racetrack is a job for many people. It would put thousands of people in the
community at risk to sell their homes as they would need to leave their employment.

Debi Ferguson stated she represented many people who love horse racing. Ms.
Ferguson said the property would need to be zoned and she said the racetrack is in
operation, but they are closed during the summer months. Ms. Ferguson discussed the
request to remove the Special Permit. She said there are two dedicated parties
interested in buying the racetrack immediately as an operating racetrack. The property
would continue to be in use with the new buyers. She said Turf Paradise had a major
economic impact for the region. She asked for help in supporting the horserace
industry.


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 534
Deer Valley Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-DV-1-23-3
August 10, 2023
Page 5


Keith Greenberg asked what the community would like to see on the property if horse
racing goes away.

Hanna Adams stated she moved to Arizona to live in the area and said the economic
impact would be devastating as feed stores, veterinarians, local shops, etc. rely on this
industry. Ms. Adams was concerned that everything surrounding the property was
residential and traffic would increase which the residents would not like and added turf
paradise was sensitive to the neighborhood and did not do nighttime racing for this
reason.

Terri Ferguson shared her background and the history of horse racing in Arizona. Ms.
Ferguson said if there is no live racing there would be no permit for off race betting and
mentioned they need live racing to continue. Ms. Ferguson indicated all they see are
warehouse facilities going up but thought they could have the new owners remain yet
add stipulations to their property to upkeep the area. She stated she opposes the zone
change.

Phil Hartman stated concerns regarding speeding cars and the animals that frequented
the ponds in the area. Mr. Hartman expressed frustration with the city and thought the
project could be pushed across the street from 19th Avenue.

Mr. Lopez-Biggs identified his concerns with the stipulation on Tierra Buena Lane and
said the stipulation would not permit access to the development from Tierra Buena
Lane.

Bill Allison of the law firm Withey Morris Baugh explained he was there to ask
questions on behalf of his client Bruin Corporation Properties. Mr. Allison raised
concerns that the application was lacking detail necessary to form an opinion of the
request and the zoning application was not adequate. Mr. Allison said it was not fair to
the public since they did not provide details which could be analyzed, and the data
center may not even fit on the property.

Mr. Allison said there was no traffic study provided as part of this project and the
neighbors should know how this is being resolved. Mr. Allison noted his client did not
hear about the hearing until recently. In conclusion, Mr. Allison stated the community
was not given an opportunity to evaluate the proposal and added this needed to be
addressed in a public forum rather than at the site plan process.

Applicant Response

Paul Gilbert stated the concerns expressed from the community were regarding the
current racetrack business and why it should stay, yet the purpose of the meeting was
just to determine the zoning and land use change request. Mr. Gilbert stated the
proposal would generate more revenue than the existing use.


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 535
Deer Valley Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-DV-1-23-3
August 10, 2023
Page 6


Mr. Gilbert said there were strong findings from staff that this should be approved. Mr.
Gilbert said his client was working with the horse race industry and other opportunities
to preserve horse racing in Arizona, possibly in another location. Mr. Gilbert addressed
the traffic concerns stating there was a stipulation to do a full and complete traffic study
and his client would be willing to bring the site plan to the Committee for future review.
Mr. Gilbert defended his client’s conceptual site plan. Mr. Gilbert stated the ongoing
litigation should not be pertinent to the request, and that the major opposition is against
the cessation of horse racing.

Chair Grossman asked how long Mr. Gilbert had been a zoning attorney. Mr. Gilbert
replied for 48 years. The Chair then asked if in the 48 years if Mr. Gilbert ever had
cases that they left so open in concept, and Mr. Gilbert replied in 50% of the cases they
had. Mr. Gilbert said they were not asking for any zoning variances.

Mr. Greenberg asked if approval of this zone change required the removal of the
Special Permit. Mr. Gilbert said they would still need to go to the City to formally
remove the Special Permit and racing could continue until it is removed.

Ms. DiLeo asked if the purchase contract forced him to sell. Mr. Gilbert said he did not
read the purchase contract. Ms. DiLeo felt Mr. Gilbert was dismissive and disrespectful
to this public body and believed it was their business to look into this deeply to see if the
future development will support the current economy in this area of the City. Ms. DiLeo
knew thousands of people rely on this industry and it was unimaginable to her of why
Mr. Gilbert would be so dismissive on these individuals’ livelihoods being threatened if
the industry were to go away.

Ricardo Romero said Turf Paradise was an iconic place and there could be concerns
of poor management.

Gregory Freeman provided insight to how there are many ways a real estate
transaction can be broken.

Mr. Gilbert said the primary negative effect of postponing the case is it leaves some
uncertainty to the client that the zoning will move forward. Mr. Gilbert clarified he
represented the buyer of Turf Paradise.


Comments from Committee
Will Novak felt what CED had to say about the case was not relevant and added that
they did not do the most basic calculation of what the property taxes would be. Mr.
Novak said he felt Mr. Gilbert spoke on both sides and indicated the applicant was
demeaning and did a poor job for his client. Mr. Novak believed the matter needed to be
tabled and recommended for the community to look at HP landmark designation for the
folks interested in horse track racing.


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 536
Deer Valley Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-DV-1-23-3
August 10, 2023
Page 7


Ms. DiLeo said this was a lot of commercial in the area and questioned if this was right
for the area. Ms. DiLeo felt one strip of land had the say which could impact people
economically and traffic in the area and her opinion was the area would be more
appropriate as residential. Ms. DiLeo felt this was a historic location and to think an
everyday commercial building would be disheartening. Ms. DiLeo was concerned with
litigation and if there was a chance to preserve the location for the community, and
believed they needed more concrete information to change the zoning.

Mr. Lopez-Biggs said the owner could demolish the whole thing and they were strictly
looking at the zoning and felt there was not enough information for the entire 250-acre
property. Mr. Lopez-Biggs said there was not enough information to make a decision.

Ms. Hoffman said the Special Permits were still over the properties, and the zoning
would not vest until the site plan was approved. Ms. Hoffman’s biggest concern was the
neighbors saying they did not get sufficient notice and wanted to ensure the public had
a voice, and felt the case needed to be postponed a month or two for time
conversations to take place. Ms. Hoffman suggested making a motion for a
continuance.

Mr. Greenberg said this was a zoning case on one strip of land. Mr. Greenberg did not
see the reason to postpone the case and said if it was up to them for Turf Paradise to
stay and if it goes he felt this would only allow a new owner to develop the land
properly. Mr. Greenberg stated if Turf Paradise goes away that they would not need a
big vacant site.

Mr. Freeman said he represents Bell Road Business Alliance and he verified he
received the communication. Mr. Freeman added they are doing a rezoning issue and
felt the zoning question should be answered.

Mr. Virgil mentioned that there was an airport where Turf Paradise is located.

Chair Grossman said a portion of the Board wants to postpone, which requires a
motion to recommend a continuance, and a portion who want to vote today. Chair
Grossman reminded that this was the first hurdle of the public process to go through
and added there was a desire to modify the stipulation for vehicular traffic from Tierra
Buena Lane.

MOTION:
MOTION #1:
Committee Member Trilese DiLeo motioned to recommend a continuance of GPA-DV-
1-23-3. Committee Member Will Novak seconded the motion.

VOTE #1:
6-6, motion to recommend a continuance of GPA DV-1-23-3 fails with Committee
Members DiLeo, Hoffman, Lopez-Biggs, Novak, Romero, and Virgil in favor; and

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 537
Deer Valley Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-DV-1-23-3
August 10, 2023
Page 8


Committee Members Davenport, Freeman, Greenberg, Sutphen, Vice Chair Kenney
and Chair Grossman in opposition.

MOTION #2:
Committee Member Keith Greenberg made a motion to recommend approval of GPA-
DV-1-23-3 per the staff recommendation. Vice Chair Matthew Kenney seconded the
motion.

VOTE #2:
8-4, motion to recommend approval of GPA-DV-1-23-3 per the staff recommendation
passes with Committee Members Davenport, Freeman, Greenberg, Hoffman, Lopez-
Biggs, Sutphen, Vice Chair Kenney and Chair Grossman in favor; and Committee
Members DiLeo, Novak, Romero and Virgil in opposition.

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 538
ATTACHMENT D


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
March 7, 2024

ITEM NO: 7
DISTRICT NO.: 3
SUBJECT:

Application #: GPA-DV-1-23-3 (Companion Case Z-31-23-3)
(Continued from November 2, 2023)
Location: Approximately 1,200 feet east and 360 feet north of the northeast corner
of 19th Avenue and Tierra Buena Lane
From: Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre
To: Mixed Use (Commercial/Commerce/Business Park)
Acreage: 18.97
Proposal: Minor General Plan Amendment to allow office/commerce park
Applicant: Jerry Simms, TP Racing, LLLP
Owner: Jerry Simms, TP Racing, LLLP
Representative: Paul E. Gilbert, Gilbert Blilie, PLLC

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Deer Valley 8/10/2023 Approval. Vote: 8-4.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Deer Valley Village Planning
Committee recommendation.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Acting Vice-Chairperson Boyd made a MOTION to approve GPA-DV-1-23-3, per
the Deer Valley Village Planning Committee recommendation.

Maker: Acting Vice-Chairperson Boyd
Second: Jaramillo
Vote: 8-0
Absent: Busching
Opposition Present: Yes

Findings:

1. The subject site is also part of a rezoning request which exceeds 10 acres and is not
consistent with the current General Plan Land Use Map designation, therefore a minor
General Plan Amendment to the Land Use Map is required.

2. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation of Mixed Use (Commercial /
Commerce/Business Park) is compatible with adjacent designations to the north and
west.

3. The companion Rezoning Case Z-31-23-3, as stipulated, includes standards that
ensure an appropriate transition in design from the proposed use to the surrounding
properties.

Page 539
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact Teleia
Galaviz at 602-291-2559, teleia.galaviz@phoenix.gov, TTY: Use 7-1-1.




Page 540
ATTACHMENT E


From: Stephen Nolan
To: Matteo Moric
Subject: Fw: Agenda for Special Racing Commission meeting, Tues. Dec 5th, 2023 @ 2:30
Date: Monday, December 4, 2023 2:56:19 PM




----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Stephen Nolan
To: Council District 3 PCC ; Debra Stark
Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 at 02:54:46 PM MST
Subject: Agenda for Special Racing Commission meeting, Tues. Dec 5th, 2023 @ 2:30

Link to Agenda
https://gaming.az.gov/file/4434/download?token=UsTxiVZ7 [gaming.az.gov]




Page 541
From: Stephen Nolan
To: Rudy Casillas; Ana Armenta; Council District 3 PCC; Debra Stark; Matteo Moric; Jackie Johnson; Caitlin Caputo;
Brian Duncan
Subject: Consideration for additional item to be placed on AZ Racing Commission Special Meeting agenda, (companion to
any request for race dates).
Date: Monday, December 4, 2023 7:37:05 AM


Good morning,

In an attempt to be completely transparent,I respectfully request an addition item be placed on any
agenda of a "Special Commission Meeting". I believe discussion is warranted concerning the permittee's
attempt to rezone a parcel of land that falls inside the fenced portion of the property that falls under the
jurisdiction of the Arizona Department of Racing, a division of the Arizona Department of Gaming and the
ARIZONA RACING COMMISSION. I am concerned that there is misinformation, as it relates to the
application for dates and the affect that the rezoning could have on Arizona's Agricultural Entertainment
Industries of Horse Racing and Breeding.

Many have said that the rezoning of the property would have no affect on racing. And I find that statement
very troublesome and not completely the whole story, thus this request for more transparency.

As mentioned above, the parcel of land trying to be rezoned falls in that part of the property that is
required to run a race meet. Therefore, it falls under the regulatory authority of the Racing Commission
leading me to request clarification as to whether the permittee has the "unfettered personal property
rights" to request rezoning without Commission approval.

It was clear that the Arizona Legislature in a recent legislation (2019, SB1144, resulted in Arizona
Revised Statute Title #5, Chapter #1 5-117) has clarified that the Permittee does not have "unfettered
authority" when it comes to regulations that fall under the regulatory umbrella of the Arizona Racing
Commission. This request is a companion to any request for dates. The industries need to know the facts
and an Attorney General review of the legal authority of the Arizona Racing Commission as it relates to
the attempt to rezone the regulated parcel of property required to run a race meet. This is a very unusual
situation that has not come to the attention of regulators as other portions of the property, that had been
rezoned, had not come before the Arizona Racing Commission as those portions of property they were
not in jeopardy of redevelopment. And is that redevelopment in the best interest of Breeding and Racing
in Arizona.

Director Casillas, I copied you a communication dated November 20th, 2023, to many more authorities,
voicing my concerns as it relates to the rezoning planned and the potential damage it could do to the
Racing and Breeding Industries in Arizona. I urge caution, and I do not understand the urgency in
rezoning if in fact there is a planned race meet through early May.

Sincerely,
Stephen H. Nolan




Page 542
From: Stephen Nolan
To: Council District 3 PCC; Debra Stark; Matteo Moric; Jackie Johnson; Caitlin Caputo; Rudy Casillas; Brian Duncan
Subject: Turf Paradise Property rezoning applications Z-31-23-3 (companion GPA-DV-1-23-3)
Date: Monday, November 20, 2023 9:29:39 PM
Attachments: IMG_1479 (1).PNG



Good morning,

The reason for this communication is to inform City of Phoenix District #3 and Councilwoman Stark and
Staff of some information as it relates to the application(s) mentioned above.

I wish to voice my concern as it is related to the August 3rd, 2023, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT STAFF
ANALYSIS (REVISED) recommending the approval of application #GPA-DV-23-1-3, (and as it relates to
application #Z-31-23-3) as much has changed since the August 3rd, revision. It appears, that the original
application(s) submitted by applicant James Watson of CT Investors, is not the same application(s) that is trying to
move forward now. For instance, referring to the June 5th, 2023 letter sent out included a conceptual site plan
showing data centers with the thought that the perimeter of the Turf Paradise property would be more
AESTHETICALLY pleasurable to our community. That plan is no longer in play and the information disseminated
prior to the August 3rd revised analysis is not the same information that currently exists at the Turf Paradise
property. The entire property is in total disarray and in deplorable condition. The application(s) are now in Simms
name, therefore, I respectfully request another review and analysis by staff addressing all the changes that have
been made prior to these applications moving forward.

THERE IS AN EXTREME NEED FOR TOTAL TRANSPARENCY AS IT IS THE CURRENT OWNER (SIMMS),
HAS 'SINGLE HANDEDLY" ALLOWED THE TURF PARADISE PROPERTY AND ARIZONA'S AGRICULTURAL
ENTERTAINMENT BUSINESSES OF HORSE RACING AND BREEDING (APPROX $100mil ECONOMIC
IMPACT TO THE STATE OF ARIZONA) TO SIGNIFICANTLY DECLINE. THE CURRENT OWNER (SIMMS) HAS
SUCKED MOST OF THE LIFE OUT OF THE VEGETATION ON THE PROPERTY BY FAILING TO WATER THE
PLANTS AND DO NORNAL LANDSCAPING UPDATES AND HAS CONTINUALLY (FOR 2 DECADES) FAILED
TO DO ANY UPDATES TO INFRASTRUCTURE OF THE PROPERTY AND BUILDINGS (APPROXIMATELY 60
STRUCTURES). IN ADDITION, THE CURRENT OWNER (SIMMS) HAS AND CURRENTLY CONTINUES TO
FAIL TO FULFILL HIS LEGAL OBLIGATION TO HOLD A RACE MEET (FROM THE FALL OF 2023 THROUGH
SPRING OF 2024) AS REQUIRED BY A 3 YEAR PERMIT GRANTED TO TURF PARADISE (SIMMS) BY THE
ARIZONA RACING COMMISSION AT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE AZ DEPARTMENT OF RACING, A
DIVISION OF THE AZ DEPARTMENT OF GAMING, WHICH DOES NOT EXPIRE UNTIL JUNE 30TH, 2024.

There are are many moving parts when dealing with the application and the applicant (Simms) and the
requested rezoning of the Turf Paradise property.
One such concern is the fact there are litigation(s) that involve the property in question that were initiated
in 2010 and involves a "land swap". (referencing Maricopa County Superior Court Case CV2010-022308
which has been Stayed pending the resolution of Maricopa County Superior Case #2016-000505 which I
believe is in the Court of Appeals). Because of the litigations, it is speculative to know if the property could
close on a purchase agreement pending the final adjudication of such cases. Because of this uncertainty,
I urge caution, as if the rezoning is allowed, and a sale is then tied up due to these outstanding litigations,
then the Turf Paradise property could potentially sit empty until such time the litigations are finally
adjudicated (as there is no end in sight). This attempted rezoning will replace the current status of
"Special Use Permit, Horse Racing".
According to a letter dated June 5th, 2023, sent by Attorneys, Beus Gilbert McGroder, this rezoning if
allowed "will become effective upon the ceasing of horse racing operations and the redevelopment of the
property or portions thereof"... It is now known that the ceasing of horse racing operations terminates on
December 31st, 2023. And if the smallest part of the property is redeveloped the whole property is
rezoned. I hope you understand the concern this raises, as this community watched the property on the
west side of !9th avenue (across from the Turf Paradise property) sit empty for near 2 decades as that
property was tied up in litigation.




Page 543
There are many other concerns, too many to address at this time. I wish to remind you that many people
showed up to speak on these applications at the Deer Valley Village Committee Meeting last Thursday
evening Nov. 16th, 2023 and were turned away as the meeting had no quorum. That was through no fault
of the community members wishing their voices be heard. And in the spirit of the Arizona Open Meeting
Laws, I feel that these applications should follow the process as originally set, (requiring an updated
review and analysis by staff as it now relates to Jerry Simms, the new applicant) and being heard by the
Deer Valley Village Committee, then to the City of Phoenix Planning Commission, and then to the City of
Phoenix City Council. To follow this procedure, it would allow for the proper time for more information to
become available to those empowered to make the best decision for our community.

There is said to be another purchase contract concerning this property and very little due diligence has
been done and it seems skeptical that it will be able to make it to the finish line in the near future. A
project of this magnitude which will be disruptive to our community for years, needs a proper review and
analysis and as Jerry Simms states that this decision will have an impact on about 5000 jobs in our
community. He stated this at the Racing Commission Meeting on October 12th, 2023 and has it published
on the Turf Paradise website. (See attached)


Thank you for your attention to this matter as many in this community ask for more transparency and
simply just want to be heard on this matter. I look forward to you response.




Page 544
Page 545
From: Stephen Nolan
To: Matteo Moric; Debra Stark
Subject: Turf Paradise Property rezoning cases.
Date: Friday, October 20, 2023 12:58:05 PM


I want to give you a quick update.
I have filed the following public records request with the planning and development department:

Public Records Request
R005336-102023 [cityofphoenixaz.govqa.us]
I would greatly appreciate a copy of the new application filed for Zoning Case No. #Z-31-23-3. In addition,
there is an accompanying Application to Amend the General Plan, application #GPA-DV-1-23-3, also on file
with Planning and Development. Could I get an update (and copy) of the status is of application #GPA-DV-1-
23-3? Thank YOU for your attention to this matter!
Status : Waiting for Clarification

Mr. Moric, Could you help me understand the process to move forward, such as a new notice being sent out? Or is
this item automatically put on next months agenda and when is next months meeting(s) (as there is confusion to
the dates that are publicly posted on the corner of 19th Ave and Tierra Buena)? Or is this meeting rescheduled
prior to the next months agenda?

I wish to voice my concern as it is related to the August 3rd, 2023, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT STAFF
ANALYSIS (REVISED) recommending the approval of application #GPA-DV-23-1-3, (and as it relates to
application #Z-31-23-3) as much has changed since the August 3rd, revision.

It appears, that the original application(s) submitted by applicant James Watson of CT Investors, is not the same
application(s) that is trying to move forward now. For instance, referring to the June 5th, 2023 letter sent out
included a conceptual site plan showing data centers and the thought that the perimeter of the Turf Paradise
property would be more AESTHETICALLY pleasurable to our community. That plan is no longer in play and the
information disseminated prior to the August 3rd revised analysis is not the same information that currently exists
at the Turf Paradise property. The entire property is in total disarray and in deplorable condition. And if the
application(s) are reverting back to the current owner (SIMMS);

THEN THERE IS AN EXTREME NEED FOR TOTAL TRANSPARENCY AS IT IS THE CURRENT OWNER
(SIMMS), THAT HAS 'SINGLE HANDEDLY" ALLOWED THE TURF PARADISE PROPERTY AND ARIZONA'S
AGRICULTURAL ENTERTAINMENT BUSINESSES OF HORSE RACING AND BREEDING (APPROX $100mil
AZ ECONOMIC IMPACT) TO SIGNIFICANTLY DECLINE. THE CURRENT OWNER (SIMMS) HAS SUCKED
MOST OF THE LIFE OUT OF THE VEGETATION ON THE PROPERTY BY FAILING TO WATER THE PLANTS
AND DO NORNAL LANDSCAPING UPDATES AND HAS CONTINUED (FOR 2 DECADES) FAILED TO DO ANY
UPDATES TO INFRASTRUCTURE OF THE PROPERTY AND BUILDINGS (APPROXIMATELY 60
STRUCTURES). IN ADDITION, THE CURRENT OWNER (SIMMS) HAS AND CURRENTLY CONTINUES TO
FAIL TO FULFILL HIS LEGAL OBLIGATION TO HOLD A RACE MEET (FROM THE FALL OF 2023 THROUGH
SPRING OF 2024) AS REQUIRED BY A 3 YEAR PERMIT GRANTED TO TURF PARADISE (SIMMS) BY THE
ARIZONA RACING COMMISSION AT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE AZ DEPARTMENT OF RACING, A
DIVISION OF THE AZ DEPARTMENT OF GAMING, WHICH DOES NOT EXPIRE UNTIL JUNE 30TH, 2024.

I respectfully request another review and analysis addressing all the changes that have been made prior to these
applications moving forward. This request is to require the appropriate transparency expected, following the
guidelines of the "Open Meeting Laws".

Please forward this communication to the Deer Valley Village Planning Committee Members and City of
Phoenix Planning Commission Members and all other interested parties.

Sincerely,
Stephen H Nolan
1120 W. Le Marche Ave
Phoenix Az, 85023


Page 546
From: Matteo Moric
To: Stephen Nolan
Cc: Sarah Stockham
Subject: RE: Turf Paradise property cases
Date: Tuesday, October 10, 2023 8:27:00 PM
Attachments: image003.png
image004.emz
image005.png


Hello Stephen,

Thank you for your input. I will forward your email to the Deer Valley Village Planning Committee.

For your information:
The applicant on a rezoning application can change. They just need to let the City of Phoenix
Planning and Development Department know the contact information for the new applicant
and sign an updated application form, which they have completed.
Approved zoning means the zoning was approved but not vested with a final site plan.
And I can not speculate on why the owners many years ago did not include the subject
approximate 28 acres into their earlier request.

Thank you,



Matteo Moric
Planner II* Village
Planning and Development Department
Long Range Planning Division
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
matteo.moric@phoenix.gov
(602) 261-8235




Mission: Planning, Development and Preservation for a Better Phoenix



From: Stephen Nolan
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2023 8:42 AM
To: Matteo Moric
Subject: Turf Paradise property cases

Please forward to Deer Valley Planning Committee Members and all appropriate.




Page 547
I will update you concerning the two dates that have come and gone as to the reason these cases were
continued from the August 10th Planning Committee Meeting.
First, the due diligence deadline (of September 15th) passed and the rezoning applicant, James Watson
of CT Investors, has walked away from the project to purchase Turf Paradise.
Secondly, the Arizona Racing Commission had a meeting on September 28th, at which time, current Turf
Paradise owner, Jerry Simms spoke (min 38:00-40:12), (715th Arizona Racing Commission Meeting
[youtube.com]) in support of the Racing Industry remaining at Turf Paradise and that is why he chose the
new prospective buyer.

[youtube.com]




715th Arizona Racing Commission Meeting



The above leads me to request further information as it pertains to item #4 scheduled on the agenda of
the Oct. 12th, Deer Valley Village Planning Committee Meeting.
Applications, GPA-DV-1-23-3, and Z-31-23 were submitted by James Watson of CT Investors, and paid
for by such on May 19th, 2023.
Now knowing (through numerous media sources and Mr. Simms statements) that Mr. James Watson of
CT Investors have walked away from this purchase project.
1) ARE THESE APPLICATIONS TRANSFERRABLE TO ANOTHER ENTITY?

In the June 28th, "Outreach Meeting", it was stated that the current zoning of the Turf Paradise property
was done in approximately 2002, and was "approved" as is, but was never "finalized" by the City of
Phoenix.
2) CAN I GET AN EXPLANATION TO THIS PROCESS OF "APPROVAL BUT NEVER FINALIZED"?
(Many things have changed to the immediate surrounding of the Turf Paradise property that were not
here in 2002, including Walmart and Sam's Club which have had a major impact to the traffic in our
community. If in fact that this technical matter is a concern, I would greatly appreciate it investigated and
a response if these cases move forward).
Additionally, at that same "Outreach Meeting" a question remains unanswered?
3) When this 2002 rezoning occurred to some of the Turf Paradise property, why was this particular 28
acre parcel left out of that rezoning at that time? (this is very peculiar as it is in the middle of the property
and a major part of the current land necessary for racing).

As I stated at the Aug 10th Planning Committee Meeting, there are many moving parts (that i believe
relevant to this process) when it comes to Turf Paradise and Owner Jerry Simms. Litigations that extend
over 13 years and one in particular that involves the State Department of Racing and the Arizona Racing
Commission that has made it to the State Supreme Court.

I wish to submit the following two photos. The first is a visual of some of the the impact that Arizona
Racing (mostly at Turf Paradise) has on the entire Arizona community. Second picture is what Turf
Paradise (on it's website) states the need for the 5000 jobs it saves.

There is a regularly scheduled Racing Commission Meeting scheduled for Thursday morning at 10:00am.



Page 548
There is not an agenda out at this time. I will forward it accordingly including a link to join with a zoom call.

Thank You,
Stephen H. Nolan
1120 W. Le Marche Ave
Phoenix, Az 85023




Page 549
From: Matteo Moric
To: Stephen Nolan
Cc: gfreeman@mpbreality.net; debstarkaz@gmail.com
Subject: GPA-DV-1-23-3 and Z-31-23-3 (Approximately 500 feet east of the northeast corner of 19th Avenue and Tierra
Buena Lane
Date: Tuesday, September 5, 2023 5:47:00 PM
Attachments: image002.png


Good afternoon Mr. Nolan,

Thank you for your interest in these cases.

The Planning Commission agenda items you are speaking of related to the Turf Paradise site (GPA-
DV-1-23-3 and Z-31-23-3) are being continued.

On August 10, the Deer Valley Village Planning Committee made a recommendation of approval of
the General Plan Amendment, and recommended a continuance of the Rezoning Case to the
October VPC meeting. The VPC meeting is planned to be on October 12, 2023 at the Deer Valley
Community Center.

If you have any correspondence of support or opposition please feel free to forward those onto me.


Thank you,



Matteo Moric
Planner II* Village
Planning and Development Department
Long Range Planning Division
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
matteo.moric@phoenix.gov
(602) 261-8235




Mission: Planning, Development and Preservation for a Better Phoenix



From: Stephen Nolan
Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2023 3:58 PM
To: Matteo Moric ; gfreeman@mpbreality.net;
debstarkaz@gmail.com



Page 550
Subject: Re: This is Greg Freeman from the Turf Paradise meeting last night

Good afternoon,
I want to thank you for being available to answer some questions as I am not familiar with the rezoning
process.

Concerning the agenda items #4 and #5 scheduled for the City of Phoenix Planning Commission Hearing
at 6:00 pm, September 7th, 2023.

I respectfully request clarification as I had left the August 10th, Deer Valley Village Planning Committee
meeting thinking that at least one if not both agenda items #4 &5 above were to be tabled until the
October meeting. The reason cited was to allow 2 important dates to occur in September. The Next
Racing Commission Meeting, now rescheduled for September 28th from a date of September 14th. And
the September due diligence deadline for the rezoning applicants, Mr. Watson to move forward with the
purchase of the property wishing to be rezoned. I feel there are numerous issues that remain
unanswered, and it is premature to move forward without gathering all possible information to be able to
make the best decision for the community.
Many factual and legal reasons can be provided in support of the continuation of these agenda items to
another date in order to allow for these meetings and deadlines to pass. A tremendous amount of
information will be gathered from the results of due diligence deadline and Racing Commission meeting.
Therefore, I respectfully request that the agenda items #4 & #5 be tabled to another date.
Sincerely,

Stephen H Nolan
1120 w Le Marche ave, Phoenix Az 85023
On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 10:03:10 AM MST, Greg Freeman wrote:



Thank you for the email, Stephen.



I just got back in town from a trip to see my wife’s family over the holiday, so pardon my delayed
response. I would love for us to meet so I can get some insight into the history of the property and hear a
bit more about things on the horse racing side. We can meet together or with other interested parties that
you see fit to include.



In this next week, I have availability to meet in the evening between 6pm and 8pm on Monday, Tuesday
or Wednesday. Let me know if one of those days and or times work for you.



Greg Freeman
PROPERTY MANAGER
gfreeman@mpbrealty.net | mpbrealty.net [mpbrealty.net]
[mpbrealty.net]O 602.280.1010 EXT 108     F 602.234.3880
1450 EAST INDIAN SCHOOL RD, SUITE 104 [MPBREALTY.NET]

PHOENIX, AZ 85014 [MPBREALTY.NET]




Page 551
From: Stephen Nolan
Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 7:09 AM
To: Greg Freeman ; Debra Stark ; Leroy
Gessmann ; Berdette ATBA ; Ivy Kushner
Subject: Re: This is Greg Freeman from the Turf Paradise meeting last night



Thank You for your response. I am willing and available to meet with you at your convenience.

My concerns are for my neighborhood, where I have resided since the mid 1980's.

I wish to gather information concerning the past rezoning of the Turf Paradise property in order to
understand why the 28 acre parcel was not included in the previous rezoning as part of this acreage is in
the middle of the property.

In the past 23 years (the period when Jerry Simms has owned the property), I have witnessed the
deterioration of this property. Many attempts to request regulators to hold Jerry Simms accountable for it's
upkeep have fallen upon deaf ears. He was able to accomplish this through his manipulation of the
Racing Commission which is the focus of litigation, that currently exist.I will bring these attempts to your
attention when we meet.

In conclusion, it is my belief that this property needs to be restored to the condition in which it was when
he purchased the property, (approximately) 1999-2000. The damage that the presence of Jerry Simms
has brought to my community, our neighborhood, the Arizona Agricultural Entertainment Businesses of
Horse Racing and Breeding, and all of Arizona are extremely visible.He has been a terrible business
neighbor to all of Arizona.

Again, Thank You for your response, and I await your reply.




On Thursday, June 29, 2023 at 12:20:15 PM MST, Greg Freeman wrote:




Stephen,

This is Greg Freeman, we met at the Turf Paradise meeting last night.
I apologize for not having a business card with me, but my contact information is attached. Let me know if
you have any questions or would like to set a time to meet.

Thank you!

Greg Freeman
PROPERTY MANAGER
gfreeman@mpbrealty.net | mpbrealty.net [mpbrealty.net]
[mpbrealty.net]O 602.280.1010 EXT 108     F 602.234.3880
1450 EAST INDIAN SCHOOL RD, SUITE 104 [MPBREALTY.NET]
PHOENIX, AZ 85014 [MPBREALTY.NET]




Page 552



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing and Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-31-23-3 -
Approximately 500 Feet East of the Northeast Corner of 19th Avenue and Tierra
Buena Lane (Ordinance G-7244)

Request to hold a public hearing and amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section
601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-31-23-
3 and rezone the site from S-1 SP (Ranch or Farm Residence, Special Permit) and C-
2 SP (Intermediate Commercial, Special Permit) to CP/GCP (Commerce Park
District/General Commerce Park Option) to allow commerce park. This is a companion
case to GPA-DV-1-23-3 and must be heard following GPA-DV-1-23-3.

Summary
Current Zoning: S-1 SP (28.69 acres) and C-2 SP (0.23-acres)
Proposed Zoning: CP/GCP
Acreage: 28.92
Proposal: Commerce park

Owner/Applicant: Jerry Simms, TP Racing, LLLP
Representative: Paul E. Gilbert, Gilbert Blilie, PLLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Deer Valley Village Planning Committee heard this item on Aug. 10,
2023, and recommended a continuance, by a vote 7-5. The Deer Valley Village
Planning Committee was scheduled to hear this item on Oct. 12, 2023, and Nov. 16,
2023, for recommendation; however, there was no quorum.
PC Action: The Planning Commission continued this item on Sept. 7, 2023, Nov. 2,
2023, and Dec. 7, 2023. The Planning Commission heard this item on March 7, 2024,
and recommended approval, per the staff memo dated March 7, 2024, by a vote of 7-
1.

Location
Approximately 500 feet east of the northeast corner of 19th Avenue and Tierra Buena
Lane
Council District: 3
Parcel Address: 16846 N. 11th Ave.; 1445, 1475, and 1501 W. Bell Road; and 1722 W.


Page 553

Tierra Buena Lane

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 554
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-31-23-3) FROM S-1 SP (RANCH OR FARM
RESIDENCE, SPECIAL PERMIT) AND C-2 SP (INTERMEDIATE
COMMERCIAL, SPECIAL PERMIT) TO CP/GCP (COMMERCE
PARK DISTRICT/GENERAL COMMERCE PARK OPTION).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of an a 28.92-acre site located approximately 500

feet east of the northeast corner of 19th Avenue and Tierra Buena Lane in a portion of

Section 6, Township 3 North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit

“A,” is hereby changed from 28.69 acres of “S-1 SP” (Ranch or Farm Residence,

Special Permit) and 0.23-acres of “C-2 SP” (Intermediate Commercial, Special Permit)

to “CP/GCP” (Commerce Park District/General Commerce Park Option).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”




Page 555
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. General conformance to the site plan date stamped March 7, 2024 as it applies
to the 28-acre site that is the subject of Z-31-23-3, as modified by the following
stipulations and approved by the Planning and Development Department.

2. Required landscape setbacks adjacent to streets shall be planted with
minimum 2-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on center
or in equivalent groupings, with five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

3. A minimum 20-foot landscaped setback shall be provided along perimeter lot
lines not adjacent to a street. This standard shall not apply if the adjacent
property is zoned C-1, C-2, C-3, A-1, A-2, commerce park. Required landscape
setbacks shall planted with 50% minimum 2-inch caliper and 50% minimum 3-
inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on center, or in
equivalent groupings, with five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

4. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrast parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

5. A minimum of 2% of the required parking spaces shall include Electric Vehicle
(EV) Installed infrastructure, and a minimum of 8% of the required parking
spaces shall include EV Capable infrastructure, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

6. All nonresidential uses over 5,000 square feet floor area shall provide one
bicycle parking space per 25 vehicle parking spaces, with a maximum of 25
spaces. Bicycle parking shall be provided through Inverted U and/or artistic
racks located near the front of offices and installed per the requirements of
Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department. Artistic racks shall adhere to the City
of Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle
Master Plan.

7. A minimum of 10% of the required bicycle parking spaces shall include
standard electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities, as




Page 556
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. A minimum of 10% of the required shrubs, shall be a milkweed or other native
nectar species, and shall be planted in groups of three or more, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

9. One outdoor employee resting area of no less than 400 square feet, or two
200-square foot areas shall be provided for each warehouse/office building on
site. Each required pedestrian area shall include a minimum of two pedestrian
seating benches, constructed of quality and durable materials, and shaded to a
minimum of 75% using minimum 2-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant
shade trees and/or architectural shade, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

10. A minimum 6-foot-wide detached sidewalk and a minimum 10-foot-wide
landscape area shall be constructed between back of curb and sidewalk on the
east side of 19th Avenue from Turf Paradise Road to Tierra Buena Lane,
planted as follows, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk, large canopy, drought-tolerant
shade trees planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings.

b. Drought tolerant shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers to
achieve a minimum of 75% live vegetative ground coverage at maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

11. A minimum 30-feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the north side of Tierra
Buena Lane, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. The improvements shall be consistent with the Minor Collector cross
section and constructed with a minimum 5-foot-wide sidewalk with a
minimum 8-foot-wide landscape area between back of curb and
sidewalk, planted as follows:

(1) Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk, large canopy, drought-
tolerant shade trees planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent
groupings.

(2) Drought tolerant shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers to
achieve a minimum of 75% live vegetative ground coverage at
maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and




Page 557
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

12. The existing traffic signal at the Phelps Road and 19th Avenue intersection
shall be fully funded and reconstructed to meet City of Phoenix standards, as
approved by the Street Transportation Department.

13. Vehicular access shall not be permitted to Tierra Buena Lane.

14. A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) shall be submitted to the City for this development.
No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is reviewed
and approved by the Street Transportation Department. The TIS shall include
signal warrant analysis for 19th Avenue and Grandview Road, and Tierra
Buena Lane and Greenway Parkway. If the approved TIS determines that a
signal is warranted at any of these intersections, the developer shall be
required to fund 100% of the cost and construct the signal, if the TIS does not
warrant the signal, the developer shall be required contribute 25% of traffic
signal cost in an escrow account to the Street Transportation Department. If the
signal is installed by others, the development shall be responsible for 100% of
the cost for signal relocation and/or modifications.

15. Replace unused driveways with sidewalk and curb and gutter. Also, replace
any broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps on all streets and
upgrade all off-site improvements to be in compliance with current ADA
guidelines.

16. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

17. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

18. Any outdoor storage areas shall be setback a minimum of 100 feet from a
residential zoning district.

19. Parking lot area(s) shall be landscaped per the standards of Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance §624.E.4.e, the C-3 (General Commercial) District.

20. Noise-generating equipment, e.g. but not limited to air chillers and generators,
shall be located a minimum of 300 feet from a residential district or shall be
shielded by a building or sound mitigation wall to achieve the required noise
level.




Page 558
21. Parking lot and security lighting shall not exceed a maximum height of 15 feet
including lamp, pole, and base within 200 feet of a residential district.

22. All on-site lighting shall be shielded to prevent direct visibility of the light source
from adjacent property.

23. Lighting shall be shielded with cut-off fixtures and deflectors to direct light
downward and limit on-site lighting levels to a maximum of one foot candle at
the property line.

24. Signage shall be subject to approval of a comprehensive sign plan per the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance §705.E.2.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 3rd day of April, 2024.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________




Page 559
REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (2 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 560
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-31-23-3

A PARCEL OF LAND LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION
6, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER
MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION DATA PER TURF PARADISE MARKETPLACE AS RECORDED IN BOOK
846, PAGE 4, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.

COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6 FROM
WHICH THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6 BEARS NORTH 89°56'54"
WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2509.05 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 00°15'13" EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 2641.07 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING;

THENCE NORTH 89°57'48" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 132.49 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 10°29'14" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 335.80 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 58°49'45" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 636.09 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 36°32'07" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 11.61 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 50°12'53" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 427.41 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 68°10'11" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 118.23 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 63°55'20" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 149.88 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 83°29'21" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 31.42 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 39°09'52" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 177.01 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 00°55'30" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 277.13 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 89°57'21" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF
OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 690.16
FEET;

THENCE NORTH 00°22'22" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 741.52 FEET;




Page 561
THENCE NORTH 44°21'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 332.06 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 74°58'19" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 139.20 FEET TO A POINT OF
NON-TANGENT CURVATURE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS IS
265.85 FEET AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS SOUTH 29°57'20” EAST A CHORD
DISTANCE OF 136.96 FEET;

THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29°51'18” AN ARC LENGTH OF 138.53 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 44°52'59" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 127.33 FEET TO A POINT OF
CURVATURE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS IS 238.05 FEET;

THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45°04'46” AN ARC LENGTH OF 187.29 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 89°59'52" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 209.06 FEET TO A POINT OF
CURVATURE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS IS 236.51 FEET;

THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45°04'14” AN ARC LENGTH OF 186.05 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 45°00'19" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1212.96 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 44°52'59" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 485.83 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 89°57'48" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 242.45 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING.

SAID DESCRIPTION CONTAINING 28.88 ACRES±.




Page 562
Page 563
ATTACHMENT B




Staff Report: Z-31-23-3
August 4, 2023

Deer Valley Village Planning August 10, 2023
Committee Meeting Date:

Planning Commission Hearing September 7, 2023
Date:
Request From: S-1 SP (Ranch or Farm Residence, Special
Permit) (28.69 acres) and C-2 SP (Intermediate
Commercial, Special Permit) (0.23 acres)

Request To: CP/GCP (Commerce Park District, General
Commerce Park Option) (28.92 acres)

Proposal: Commerce Park

Location: Approximately 500 feet east of the northeast
corner of 19th Avenue and Tierra Buena Lane

Owner: TP Racing, LLLP

Applicant: James Watson, CT Investors

Representative: Paul E. Gilbert, Beus Gilbert McGroder PLLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations


General Plan Conformity
Existing:
Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce/Business Park) (14.77 acres)
General Plan Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre (14.15 acres)
Land Use Map
Designation Proposed:
Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce/Business Park) (28.92 acres)


Street Map
Classification Tierra Buena Lane Local 25-foot north half street




Page 564
Staff Report: Z-31-23-3
August 4, 2023

CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; BICYCLES; LAND USE
PRINCIPLE: Development should include convenient bicycle parking.

The proposal, as stipulated, will provide bicycle parking for nonresidential uses.

STRENGTHEN OUR LOCAL ECONOMY CORE VALUE; JOB CREATION
(EMPLOYERS); LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Support General Plan Land Use Map and
zoning changes that will facilitate the location of employment generating uses in
each of the designated employment centers.

A portion of the subject site is within the North I-17 Major Employment Center and is
compatible with the planned development on the remainder of the Turf Paradise site.
The proposal will allow for an underutilized property to be redeveloped for employment
generating uses within the North I-17 Major Employment Center.

BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES AND SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPLES: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new
development and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.

The proposal, as stipulated, will provide shade trees along the detached sidewalks
adjacent to 19th Avenue and Tierra Buena Lane.



Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives

Monarch Butterfly Pledge – See Background Item No. 6.

Tree and Shade Master Plan – See Background Item No. 7.

Complete Streets Guiding Principles – See Background Item No. 8.

Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan – See Background Item No. 9.

Zero Waste PHX – See Background Item No. 10.

Transportation Electrification Action Plan – See Background Item No. 11.




Page 565
Staff Report: Z-31-23-3
August 4, 2023

Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning
Land Use Zoning
On Site Horse racetrack and S-1 SP and C-2 SP
ancillary uses
North Horse racetrack S-1 SP (Approved C-2 SP
or CP/BP) and S-1 SP
(Approved CP/GCP)
South (across Tierra Buena Singe-family residential R1-6 SP
Lane) and mobile home park
East Vacant S-1 SP (Approved C-2 SP
or CP/BP), C-2 SP, and S-
West Horse racetrack and S-1 SP (Approved C-2 SP
ancillary uses or CP/BP)

CP/GCP (Commerce Park District, General Commerce Park Option)

Standards Requirements Proposed

Gross Acreage - 28.92 acres
Building Setbacks
Adjacent to perimeter 30 feet Not specified
lot line on a street
Adjacent to interior lot 20 feet Not specified
line on a street
Adjacent to perimeter 20 feet Not specified
lot line not on a street
Adjacent to interior lot 0 feet Not specified
line not on a street
Landscape Setbacks
Adjacent to perimeter 30 feet Not specified
lot line on a street
Adjacent to interior lot 20 feet Not specified
line on a street
Lot Coverage Maximum 50 percent Not specified
Building Height Maximum 18 feet within 30 feet of perimeter Not specified
lot line; 1-foot increase in height per 3 feet in
additional setback, to a maximum of 56 feet
Parking Unspecified Industrial Use (Shell Building) Not specified
with gross floor area of 150,001 to 500,000
square feet: 1 space per 2,000 square feet
*Site plan revision or variance required




Page 566
Staff Report: Z-31-23-3
August 4, 2023


Background / Issues / Analysis

SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone 28.92 acres located approximately 500 feet east of the
northeast corner of 19th Avenue and Tierra Buena Lane from S-1 SP (Ranch or Farm
Residence, Special Permit) and C-2 SP (Intermediate Commercial, Special Permit) to
CP/GCP (Commerce Park District/General Commerce Park Option) for a commerce
park development.

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION
2. The General Plan Land Use Map designation for the subject site is 14.77 acres of Mixed
Use (Commercial / Commerce/Business Park) and 14.15 acres of Residential 2 to 5
dwelling units per acre. The proposal for CP/GCP zoning is consistent with the Mixed
Use (Commercial / Commerce/Business Park) designation but is inconsistent with the
Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre designation. A concurrent minor General Plan
Amendment case, GPA-DV-1-23-3, is proposed to change the General Plan Land Use
Map designation for 14.15 acres of the site from Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per
acre to Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce/Business Park). The proposal for CP/GCP
zoning is consistent with the proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation. The
subject site is partially within the North I-17 Major Employment Center.

North:
The General Plan Land Use Map designation for the area to the north is Mixed Use
(Commercial / Commerce/Business Park) and Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre.

East and Southeast:
The General Plan Land Use Map designation for the area to the east is Residential 2 to
5 dwelling units per acre and Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce/Business Park).

South:
The General Plan Land Use Map designation for the area to the south is Residential 5
to 15 dwelling units per acre.

West:
The General Plan Land Use Map designation for the area to the west is Mixed Use
(Commercial / Commerce/Business Park).




Page 567
Staff Report: Z-31-23-3
August 4, 2023




Existing and Proposed General Plan Land Use Map
Source: Planning and Development Department




Page 568
Staff Report: Z-31-23-3
August 4, 2023




Major Employment Centers Map
Source: Planning and Development Department

SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
3. Subject Site:
The subject site is part of the Turf Paradise horse racetrack and currently zoned S-1 SP
(Ranch or Farm Residence, Special Permit) and C-2 SP (Intermediate Commercial,
Special Permit).

North:
North of the subject site is also part of the existing horse racetrack property zoned S-1
SP (Approved C-2 SP or CP/BP) (Ranch or Farm Residence, Special Permit,
Intermediate Commercial, Special Permit, or Commerce Park District/Business Park
Option) and S-1 SP (Approved CP/GCP) (Ranch or Farm Residence SP, Commerce
Park District/General Commerce Park Option).

South:
South of the subject site across Tierra Buena Lane are single-family residences and a
mobile home park zoned R1-6 SP (Single-Family Residence District, Special Permit).

East and Southeast:
East of the subject site is vacant land, zoned S-1 SP (Approved C-2 SP or CP/BP), C-2
SP, and S-1.

West:
West of the subject site is also part of the horse racetrack property also zoned S-1 SP
(Approved C-2 SP or CP/BP).




Page 569
Staff Report: Z-31-23-3
August 4, 2023




Zoning Sketch Map
Source: Planning and Development Department

PROPOSAL
4. Site Plan
The subject site is within the Turf Paradise horse racetrack property, which was
established with Rezoning Case Nos. Z-83-70 and Z-SP-18-70-3, and amended by Z-
108-00. The horse racetrack will be closed upon redevelopment of the site. The site
plan, attached as an exhibit, depicts a commerce park development for the larger part of
the Turf Paradise site with eight unspecified industrial shell buildings, totaling
approximately 1,847,000 square feet and two data center buildings totaling
approximately 796,000 square feet. Vehicular access will be from Turf Paradise Road,
19th Avenue, and Tierra Buena Lane. The rezoning area only covers a portion of the
overall commerce park site due to existing zoning entitlements that allow commerce
park development for the other portions of the overall site. The site plan depicts the
buildings having loading bay doors with loading dock areas. The number of parking
spaces are not specified. To ensure employees have a designated space to rest
outdoors, staff recommends that one outdoor employee resting area of no less than 400
square feet, or two 200-square foot areas, be provided for each warehouse/office




Page 570
Staff Report: Z-31-23-3
August 4, 2023

building on site. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 7. Staff also recommends that the
required landscape setbacks include minimum two-inch caliper trees (Stipulation No.1),
to increase shade throughout the site.

5. Elevations
Renderings, attached as an exhibit, depict typical commerce park architecture with
some variation in colors, materials, breaking of massing, and architectural
embellishments.

PLANS, OVERLAYS, AND INITATIVES
6. Monarch Butterfly Pledge
In April 2021, Mayor Kate Gallego signed the National Wildlife Federation's
Mayor's Monarch Pledge. This pledge commits the city to take action to support
the monarch butterfly population. In the United States, loss of milkweed habitat is
a major factor in the decline of the monarchs. Arizona has at least 29 species of
milkweed native to the state. Adult monarchs feed on the nectar of many flowers,
but they breed only where milkweeds are found. To support the monarch butterfly
population, Stipulation No. 6 addresses the planting of milkweed shrubs, or other
native nectar plant species, on the subject site.

7. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan encourages treating the urban forest as infrastructure
to ensure the trees are an integral part of the City’s planning and development process.
Sidewalks on the street frontages should be detached from the curbs to allow trees to
be planted on both sides of the sidewalk to provide thermal comfort for pedestrians and
to reduce the urban heat island effect. Staff is recommending stipulations designed to
provide trees and enhance shade within and adjacent to the development. Staff is
recommending stipulations for a detached shaded sidewalk along 19th Avenue and
Tierra Buena Lane, in addition to enhanced landscape standards in the required
landscape setbacks. Additionally, staff recommends employee resting areas be shaded
to a minimum of 75 percent. These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 1, 7, 8, and 9.

8. Complete Streets Guiding Principles
In 2014, the City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding
Principles. The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an
accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such as
bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. To provide a safe pedestrian
environment, staff is recommending that enhanced pavement treatment for the
on-site pedestrian walkways that cross vehicular drive aisles and detached sidewalks to
ensure a more comfortable and safe walking environment. This is addressed in
Stipulation Nos. 2, 8 and 9.




Page 571
Staff Report: Z-31-23-3
August 4, 2023

9. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
The City of Phoenix adopted the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan in 2014 to guide
the development of its Bikeway System and supportive infrastructure. The
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan also supports options for both short-and long-term
bicycle parking as a means of promoting bicyclist traffic to a variety of destinations,
including commerce park employment centers. Stipulation Nos. 4 and 5 require bicycle
parking spaces be provided on the site with electrical bicycle charging capabilities.

10. Zero Waste PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal to
become a zero-waste city, as part of the city’s overall 2050 Environmental Sustainability
Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and expand its recycling
and other waste diversion programs. Section 716 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance
establishes standards to encourage the provision of recycling containers for multifamily,
commercial and mixed-use developments meeting certain criteria. The applicant’s
submittal materials indicate that it is expected that any future commerce park users will
include recycling along with standard waste containers.

11. Transportation Electrification Action Plan
In June 2022, the Phoenix City Council approved the Transportation Electrification
Action Plan. The current market desire for the electrification of transportation is both a
national and global phenomenon, fueled by a desire for better air quality, a reduction in
carbon emissions, and a reduction in vehicle operating and maintenance costs.
Businesses, governments and the public are signaling strong future demand for electric
vehicles (EVs), and many automobile manufacturers have declared plans for a transition
to fully electric offerings within the coming decade. This Plan contains policy initiatives
to prepare the City for a future filled with more EVs, charging infrastructure and e-
mobility equity, and outlines a roadmap for a five-step plan to prepare for the EV
infrastructure needs of 280,000 EVs in Phoenix by 2030. One goal of the Plan to
accelerate public adoption of electric vehicles through workplace, business, and
multifamily charging infrastructure recommends a standard stipulation for rezoning
cases to provide EV charging infrastructure. Stipulation No. 3 provides requirements for
EV parking with EV charging infrastructure installed and EV capable infrastructure, and
Stipulation No. 5 requires electrical bicycle charging capabilities.

COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
12. At the time the staff report was written, staff has not received any correspondence from
members of the public.

INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
13. Public Transit Department
The Public Transit Department commented that there should be two bus stop pads on
northbound 19th Avenue and one on eastbound Bell Road. These will be provided with
the construction of the surrounding commerce park development.




Page 572
Staff Report: Z-31-23-3
August 4, 2023

14. Signs Section
The Signs Section commented that they would suggest the applicant submit a use
permit to adopt a Comprehensive Sign Plan (CSP) for the entire development prior to
requesting the first sign permit.

15. Water Services Department
The City of Phoenix Water Services Department has noted the property has existing
water and sewer mains that can potentially serve the proposed development; however,
water capacity is a dynamic condition that can change over time due to a variety of
factors.

16. Street Transportation Department
The Street Transportation Department commented on access point separation, driveway
right-in / right-out restrictions, and driveway separation requirements from traffic signals.
The Street Transportation Department requested the following, which are addressed in
Stipulations Nos. 8 through 13:
• Detached sidewalks separated by landscape strips for 19th Avenue and Tierra
Buena Lane.
• Minimum right-of-way dedication for the north side of Tierra Buena Lane.
• Funding and reconstruction of the existing traffic signal at the Phelps Road and
19th Avenue intersection.
• Vehicular access not permitted to Tierra Buena Lane.
• Submittal and approval of a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prior to preliminary site
plan approval.
• Replacing unused driveways with sidewalk, curb and gutter, and replacing any
broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on all streets and
upgrading all off-site improvements to be in compliance with current ADA
guidelines.

17. The City of Phoenix Fire Department commented that they do not anticipate any
problems with the case. However, the water supply is required to meet fire flow as
defined by Appendix B of the 2018 IFC with Phoenix Amendments.

OTHER
18. The site is not located in an area identified as being archaeologically sensitive. However,
in the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, ground-
disturbing activities must cease to allow the Archaeology Office time to assess the
materials. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 14.

19. Staff has not received a completed form for the Waiver of Claims for Diminution in Value
of Property under Proposition 207 (A.R.S. 12-1131 et seq.), as required by the rezoning
application process. Therefore, a stipulation has been added to require the form be
completed and submitted prior to preliminary site plan approval. This is addressed in
Stipulation No. 15.




Page 573
Staff Report: Z-31-23-3
August 4, 2023


20. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and ordinances.
Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements.

Findings

1. The proposal is consistent with the existing and proposed General Plan Land Use Map
designation of Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce/Business Park).

2. The proposal provides a diversity of commerce park type uses nearby the North I-17
Major Employment Center.

3. As stipulated, the proposal supports efforts from various plans, such as the Monarch
Butterfly Pledge, the Tree and Shade Master Plan, the Complete
Streets Guiding Principles, the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan, and the
Transportation Electrification Action Plan.

Stipulations

1. Required landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper large
canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, with five
5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

2. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be constructed
of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments
that visually contrast parking and drive aisle surfaces, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

3. A minimum of 2% of the required parking spaces shall include Electric Vehicle (EV)
Installed infrastructure, and a minimum of 8% of the required parking spaces shall
include EV Capable infrastructure, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

4. All nonresidential uses over 5,000 square feet floor area shall provide one bicycle
parking space per 25 vehicle parking spaces, with a maximum of 25 spaces. Bicycle
parking shall be provided through Inverted U and/or artistic racks located near the
front of offices and installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Artistic racks shall adhere to the City of Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K of
the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.

5. A minimum of 10% of the required bicycle parking spaces shall include standard
electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.




Page 574
Staff Report: Z-31-23-3
August 4, 2023

6. A minimum of 10% of the required shrubs, shall be a milkweed or other native nectar
species, and shall be planted in groups of three or more, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

7. One outdoor employee resting area of no less than 400 square feet, or two 200-
square foot areas shall be provided for each warehouse/office building on site. Each
required pedestrian area shall include a minimum of two pedestrian seating benches,
constructed of quality and durable materials, and shaded to a minimum of 75% using
minimum 2-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant shade trees and/or
architectural shade, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. A minimum 6-foot-wide detached sidewalk and a minimum 10-foot-wide landscape
area shall be constructed between back of curb and sidewalk on the east side of 19th
Avenue from Turf Paradise Road to Tierra Buena Lane, planted as follows, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk, large canopy, drought-tolerant shade trees
planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings.

b. Drought tolerant shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers to achieve a
minimum of 75% live vegetative ground coverage at maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

9. A minimum 30-feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the north side of Tierra
Buena Lane, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. The improvements shall be consistent with the Minor Collector cross section and
constructed with a minimum 5-foot-wide sidewalk with a minimum 8-foot-wide
landscape area between back of curb and sidewalk, planted as follows:

(1) Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk, large canopy, drought-tolerant shade
trees planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings.

(2) Drought tolerant shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers to achieve a
minimum of 75% live vegetative ground coverage at maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

10. The existing traffic signal at the Phelps Road and 19th Avenue intersection shall be
fully funded and reconstructed to meet City of Phoenix standards, as approved by the




Page 575
Staff Report: Z-31-23-3
August 4, 2023

Street Transportation Department.

11. Vehicular access shall not be permitted to Tierra Buena Lane.

12. A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) shall be submitted to the City for this development. No
preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is reviewed and
approved by the Street Transportation Department. The TIS shall include signal
warrant analysis for 19th Avenue and Grandview Road, and Tierra Buena Lane and
Greenway Parkway. If the approved TIS determines that a signal is warranted at any
of these intersections, the developer shall be required to fund 100% of the cost and
construct the signal, if the TIS does not warrant the signal, the developer shall be
required contribute 25% of traffic signal cost in an escrow account to the Street
Transportation Department. If the signal is installed by others, the development shall
be responsible for 100% of the cost for signal relocation and/or modifications.

13. Replace unused driveways with sidewalk and curb and gutter. Also, replace any
broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps on all streets and upgrade
all off-site improvements to be in compliance with current ADA guidelines.

14. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33- foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

15. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application
file for record.

Writer
Adrian Zambrano
Matteo Moric
August 4, 2023

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
Zoning sketch map
Aerial sketch map
Site plan date stamped May 19, 2023
Renderings date stamped May 19, 2023 (2 pages)




Page 576
TURF PARADISE RD

S-1 *
A-1 Z-SP-18-A-70
PCD*
Z-104-I-75


PCD*
11TH AVE
CP/GCP *
Z-104-75 Z-108-00
C-2 SP or CP/BP*
Z-108-00
CP/GCP PCD*
Z-104-I-75
S-1 SP *
Z-SP-18-A-70
GRANDVIEW RD




R-2 PCD *

19TH AVE
ANX 68

19TH DR
Z-104-75 R1-6 *
Z-104-D-75 S-1 Z-140-97

R-2 *
Z-104-E-75
Z-143-03
BUSONI PL C-2 SP * Z-140-97
Z-83-70
Z-SP-18-70

EN W
R-3 * AY P
KW Y
Z-49-16
TIERRA BUENA LN


14TH DR
G RE


15TH AVE
R1-6 R1-6 * R1-6 *
R-2* C-2 Z-SP-9-65
WALTANN LN
Z-SP-37-70
R1-8 *
AV
Z-103-84 E

17TH DR 17TH AVE
15T
LN
16TH DR
TH
SE HD Z-8-96
R1-8 *
Y
EL R
T Y Z-28-92
BET K
LN
C
BE
RE-35 R1-10 *
Z-28-92


I
Miles
JOMAX RD

HAPPY VALLEY RD
Z-31-23
PINNACLE PEAK RD
0.1 0.05 0 0.1
DEER VALLEY VILLAGE
DEER VALLEY DR

SR 101
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3 UNION HILLS DR

BELL RD

7TH ST
16TH ST
7TH AVE
GREENWAY RD


19TH AVE
I - 17
35TH AVE
51ST AVE 43RD AVE



APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
CT Investors c/o James Watson
FROM:
S-1 SP ( 28.69 ac.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
7/11/2023 C-2 SP ( 0.23 ac.)
Z-31-23 REVISION DATES:



GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
28.92 Acres QS 35-25, QS 36-25, L-7, M-7, M-8
TO: CP/GCP ( 28.92 ac.)
QS 36-26
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 SP, C-2 SP 28, 3 N/A, 4
CP/GCP N/A N/A

* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Page 577
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2023\Z-31-23.mxd
TURF PARADISE RD

S-1 *
A-1 Z-SP-18-A-70
PCD*
Z-104-I-75


PCD*
11TH AVE
CP/GCP *
Z-104-75 Z-108-00
C-2 SP or CP/BP*
Z-108-00
CP/GCP PCD*
Z-104-I-75
S-1 SP *
Z-SP-18-A-70
GRANDVIEW RD




R-2 PCD *

19TH AVE
ANX 68

19TH DR
Z-104-75 R1-6 *
Z-104-D-75 S-1 Z-140-97

R-2 *
Z-104-E-75
Z-143-03
BUSONI PL C-2 SP * Z-140-97
Z-83-70
Z-SP-18-70

EN W
R-3 * AY P
KW Y
Z-49-16
TIERRA BUENA LN


14TH DR
G RE


15TH AVE
R1-6 R1-6 * R1-6 *
R-2* C-2 Z-SP-9-65
WALTANN LN
Z-SP-37-70
R1-8 *
AV
Z-103-84 E

17TH DR 17TH AVE
15T
LN
16TH DR
TH
SE HD Z-8-96
R1-8 *
Y
EL R
T Y Z-28-92
BET K
LN
C
BE
RE-35 R1-10 *
Maricopa County Assessor's Office


Z-28-92


I
Miles
JOMAX RD

HAPPY VALLEY RD
Z-31-23
PINNACLE PEAK RD
0.1 0.05 0 0.1
DEER VALLEY VILLAGE
DEER VALLEY DR

SR 101
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3 UNION HILLS DR

BELL RD

7TH ST
16TH ST
7TH AVE
GREENWAY RD


19TH AVE
I - 17
35TH AVE
51ST AVE 43RD AVE



APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
CT Investors c/o James Watson
FROM:
S-1 SP ( 28.69 ac.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
7/11/2023 C-2 SP ( 0.23 ac.)
Z-31-23 REVISION DATES:



GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
28.92 Acres QS 35-25, QS 36-25, L-7, M-7, M-8
TO: CP/GCP ( 28.92 ac.)
QS 36-26
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 SP, C-2 SP 28, 3 N/A, 4
CP/GCP N/A N/A

* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Page 578
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2023\Z-31-23.mxd
   

     
,
,,
 
  
 
 
 
 
 


 ,
,,

 ,

  ,,
  ,
Page 579


     ,,

 , ,
 ,,
   ,,  ,
,
,,

,
,,


 
,, ,
,,
  ,,  ,,
 

,
REZONING
 
 ,,
AREA
,
 ,,
 
 
              
            
( "#*! +),,'$%&!(),
Page 580




WINNERS CIRCLE BUSINESS PARK
&RQFHSWXDO(OHYDWLRQV
&RQFHSWXDO(OHYDWLRQV4XDOLW\ 0DWHULDOV
3hoenix, Arizona
Page 581




WINNERS CIRCLE BUSINESS PARK
&RQFHSWXDO(OHYDWLRQV
&RQFHSWXDO(OHYDWLRQV4XDOLW\ 0DWHULDOV
3hoenix, Arizona
ATTACHMENT C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-31-23-3



Date of VPC Meeting November 16, 2023
Request From S-1 SP and C-2 SP
Request To CP/GCP
Proposal Commerce park
Location Approximately 500 feet east of the northeast corner of
19th Avenue and Tierra Buena Lane
VPC Recommendation No quorum
VPC Vote No quorum


VPC DISCUSSION:

No quorum.


STAFF COMMENTS:

No quorum.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 582
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-31-23-3



Date of VPC Meeting October 12, 2023
Request From S-1 SP and C-2 SP
Request To CP/GCP
Proposal Commerce park
Location Approximately 500 feet east of the northeast corner of
19th Avenue and Tierra Buena Lane
VPC Recommendation No quorum
VPC Vote No quorum


VPC DISCUSSION:

No quorum.


STAFF COMMENTS:

No quorum.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 583
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-31-23-3



Date of VPC Meeting August 10, 2023
Request From S-1 SP and C-2 SP
Request To CP/GCP
Proposal Commerce park
Location Approximately 500 feet east of the northeast corner of
19th Avenue and Tierra Buena Lane
VPC Recommendation Continuance to the October VPC meeting
VPC Vote 7-5

Item No. 6 (GPA-DV-1-23-3) and Item No. 7 (Z-31-23-3) are companion cases and were
heard together.

Six members of the public registered to speak on this item, in opposition.

VPC DISCUSSION:

Matteo Moric, staff, noted that Case GPA-DV-1-23-3 would be heard at the same time
as Case Z-31-23-3, but would require two separate motions. Mr. Moric provided an
overview and identified where the site was located, the site size and the requests. Mr.
Moric noted a general plan amendment was required and there would be no stipulations
associated with the general plan land use change request. Mr. Moric described the
surrounding zoning, uses and general plan land use designation and showed the
renderings and conceptual plan. Mr. Moric noted there was one letter of opposition for
the general plan request and identified the staff findings and stipulations.

Keith Greenberg stated a concern with the milkweed specifically stipulated as he felt it
was an invasive plant which could take up a lot of space. Mr. Moric, staff, and Sandra
Hoffman provided additional information on the milkweed plant and the monarch
butterfly pledge.

APPLICANT PRESENTATION

Paul Gilbert with Beus, Gilbert, McGroder, LLC, introduced himself as representing CT
Realty who had a majority of the Turf Paradise property under contract and were
currently doing their due diligence. Mr. Gilbert explained that 85% of the overall Turf

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 584
Deer Valley Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-31-23-3
August 10, 2023
Page 2


Paradise property was already zoned and tonight was a rezone of the small piece of the
property of approximately 28 acres. Mr. Gilbert shared the zoning history as he was the
attorney who represented the Turf Paradise property owner in 2002. Mr. Gilbert said a
majority of the property was zoned S-1 but in 2002, the applicant rezoned the property
but did not vest the property. Mr. Gilbert added that in 2002 Turf Paradise was able to
operate with the Special Permit overlay. Mr. Gilbert noted the zoning would change
upon processing a site plan, but they were not doing that, and they needed to wrap up
the zoning to decide if his client wanted to move forward with the purchase. Mr. Gilbert
described the zoning of the majority of the Turf Paradise property, which is approved
but not vested, and said the property on the west side was zoned for a combination C-2
(Intermediate Commercial) or CP/BP (Commerce Park/Business Park Option). Mr.
Gilbert noted the C-2 allows for all types of retail and services and the CP/BP would
allow employment, warehouse distribution, along with light manufacturing and
assembly. Mr. Gilbert added the east side was zoned CP/GCP (Commerce
Park/General Commerce Park Option) and said this option allows a little more flexibility.

Mr. Gilbert said the subject of the zoning request was for the 28 acre portion and did
not know why the land was not rezoned from S-1 in 2002. Now, Mr. Gilbert said they
wanted it to be CP/GCP to be commensurate with the bulk of the Turf Paradise site. Mr.
Gilbert said this was a conceptual site plan and they were not ready to create a final site
plan. Mr. Gilbert added that the conceptual site plan showed the uses that could go in a
commerce park, and they were going to use commercial retail option on the small
portion that fronts Bell Road at the intersection of 15th Avenue. Mr. Gilbert noted they
wanted to keep the grandstand structure of Turf Paradise and continue the off-track
racing. He said they’d continue with the off-track betting but not live horse racing. The
parking and grandstand would remain; however, the horse track and racing would go.

Mr. Gilbert added that in addition to the rezoning request a general plan amendment
was required to change about 14 acres of the property. Mr. Gilbert said approximately
half the 28 acres had the correct general plan land use designation.

Mr. Gilbert shared their public outreach efforts and said they presented their case
virtually to every neighborhood association in the area. He explained how they utilized
the entire boundary of Turf Paradise rather than the 28 acres which was 6 or 7 times
more people required to contact.

Mr. Gilbert said there was a strong staff recommendation and strong encouragement
from the Economic Development Department. Mr. Gilbert read the staff findings and
emphasized a portion of the site was within the I-17 Major Employment Corridor. Mr.
Gilbert said they agreed with all the stipulations except one minor exception with
stipulation number 11 which states vehicular access shall not be permitted on Tierra
Buena Lane. Mr. Gilbert said there was good reason for the stipulation as Tierra Buena
Lane was a residential street and requested the stipulation to be modified to say
vehicular access shall not be permitted on Tierra Buena Lane as long as the applicable
roadway is classified as a residential road.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 585
Deer Valley Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-31-23-3
August 10, 2023
Page 3



QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE

Trilese DiLeo questioned how much of the property the escrow was addressing to
which Mr. Gilbert replied that it was for the entire Turf Paradise property.

Ms. DiLeo inquired about the history of the zoning and why the zoning was not for the
entire property since Turf Paradise existed in 2002. Mr. Gilbert said he could not
remember all the history of why that was other than staff pointed him in that direction at
the time. Mr. Gilbert indicated staff wanted to control the site plan as they had no uses
for that part of the site at that time.

Ms. DiLeo asked why it was not being rezoned to residential due to the housing
demand. Mr. Gilbert said there was a need for both housing and employment and they
spent a significant amount of time with Economic Development Department and stated
the site would be much more conducive to commerce park uses.

Braden Lopez-Biggs inquired about the amount of property in the S-1 zoning and if
there was any intention to build housing on that portion. Mr. Lopez-Biggs also wanted
clarity on stipulation No. 11 and wanted to know how it could be classified as a non-
residential street.

Mr. Gilbert stated the C-2 allows building multifamily. Mr. Gilbert also noted that they
were welcome to add a stipulation to come to the Village Planning Committee with a site
plan in the future.

Will Novak questioned if there was a study on how much property tax the property
generated as is versus the amount after it is developed. Mr. Novak asked if a user was
lined up and if there was a phasing plan.

Mr. Gilbert mentioned that there was no phasing plan developed yet.

Mr. Novak also asked if they thought about the grandstand getting historic preservation
designation. Mr. Gilbert said he was not sure as they had never been asked the
question with his client.

Ms. Hoffman asked if there was a traffic analysis. Mr. Gilbert said a traffic study was
required for the entire project when they come in to do the site plan. Ms. Hoffman stated
the plan was quite conceptual and it may be premature to move forward. Ms. Hoffman
asked if they’d come back with more details.

Mr. Gilbert said they’d comply with the Zoning Ordinance for setbacks and height. And
Mr. Gilbert said he was keenly aware this was a major development as approximately
250 acres. He said if they’d want more details later he’d come back when its time for the
site plan.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 586
Deer Valley Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-31-23-3
August 10, 2023
Page 4



Trilese DiLeo believed modifying stipulation no. 11 would not work. She felt the entire
mobile home park and residents down the road would be impacted.

Public Comments

Stephan H. Nolan said he lived in the area for many years and has been in the horse
race business. Mr. Nolan said that the acting general manager of the property does not
know if the property sale will be complete. Mr. Nolan said he was concerned with car
accidents and traffic. Mr. Nolan wanted this at least postponed to October to decide if
the owner of the horse race business wanted to go through. He noted that there was
litigation of the property and expressed concerns about the current owners previous
motivation to sell and there was a concern if the sale would even go through. Mr. Nolan
wanted the issue to be tabled and indicated the horse race industry employees felt the
meeting was strategic so there would not be opposition.

Chairman Grossman informed Mr. Nolan that his 3 minute time had expired. Ms.
DiLeo stated she wanted to continue to listen to Mr. Nolan’s comments. Mr. Lopez-
Biggs noted that if they allow Mr. Nolan to exceed 3 minutes they would need to allow
all members of the community to do so.

Chairman Grossman stated he would allow Mr. Nolan to continue his remarks yet
adhere to the 3 minute time line unless he feels it is appropriate to extend.

Mr. Nolan noted that this is an agricultural entertainment industry that would impact
many people’s livelihoods.

Ms. DiLeo asked about the amount of money horse racing brings to the region
economically. Mr. Nolan responded that there was a lot of money brought into the state
and felt this site needed to remain horse racing.

Cynthia George shared her ties to the community and said she was a horse racing
professional. Ms. George said Turf Paradise supports many self-supportive businesses
and the racetrack is a job for many people. It would put thousands of people in the
community at risk to sell their homes as they would need to leave their employment.

Debi Ferguson stated she represented many people who love horse racing. Ms.
Ferguson said the property would need to be zoned and she said the racetrack is in
operation, but they are closed during the summer months. Ms. Ferguson discussed the
request to remove the Special Permit. She said there are two dedicated parties
interested in buying the racetrack immediately as an operating racetrack. The property
would continue to be in use with the new buyers. She said Turf Paradise had a major
economic impact for the region. She asked for help in supporting the horserace
industry.


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 587
Deer Valley Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-31-23-3
August 10, 2023
Page 5


Keith Greenberg asked what the community would like to see on the property if horse
racing goes away.

Hanna Adams stated she moved to Arizona to live in the area and said the economic
impact would be devastating as feed stores, veterinarians, local shops, etc. rely on this
industry. Ms. Adams was concerned that everything surrounding the property was
residential and traffic would increase which the residents would not like and added turf
paradise was sensitive to the neighborhood and did not do nighttime racing for this
reason.

Terri Ferguson shared her background and the history of horse racing in Arizona. Ms.
Ferguson said if there is no live racing there would be no permit for off race betting and
mentioned they need live racing to continue. Ms. Ferguson indicated all they see are
warehouse facilities going up but thought they could have the new owners remain yet
add stipulations to their property to upkeep the area. She stated she opposes the zone
change.

Phil Hartman stated concerns regarding speeding cars and the animals that frequented
the ponds in the area. Mr. Hartman expressed frustration with the city and thought the
project could be pushed across the street from 19th Avenue.

Mr. Lopez-Biggs identified his concerns with the stipulation on Tierra Buena Lane and
said the stipulation would not permit access to the development from Tierra Buena
Lane.

Bill Allison of the law firm Withey Morris Baugh explained he was there to ask
questions on behalf of his client Bruin Corporation Properties. Mr. Allison raised
concerns that the application was lacking detail necessary to form an opinion of the
request and the zoning application was not adequate. Mr. Allison said it was not fair to
the public since they did not provide details which could be analyzed, and the data
center may not even fit on the property.

Mr. Allison said there was no traffic study provided as part of this project and the
neighbors should know how this is being resolved. Mr. Allison noted his client did not
hear about the hearing until recently. In conclusion, Mr. Allison stated the community
was not given an opportunity to evaluate the proposal and added this needed to be
addressed in a public forum rather than at the site plan process.

Applicant Response

Paul Gilbert stated the concerns expressed from the community were regarding the
current racetrack business and why it should stay, yet the purpose of the meeting was
just to determine the zoning and land use change request. Mr. Gilbert stated the
proposal would generate more revenue than the existing use.


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 588
Deer Valley Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-31-23-3
August 10, 2023
Page 6


Mr. Gilbert said there were strong findings from staff that this should be approved. Mr.
Gilbert said his client was working with the horse race industry and other opportunities
to preserve horse racing in Arizona, possibly in another location. Mr. Gilbert addressed
the traffic concerns stating there was a stipulation to do a full and complete traffic study
and his client would be willing to bring the site plan to the Committee for future review.
Mr. Gilbert defended his client’s conceptual site plan. Mr. Gilbert stated the ongoing
litigation should not be pertinent to the request, and that the major opposition is against
the cessation of horse racing.

Chair Grossman asked how long Mr. Gilbert had been a zoning attorney. Mr. Gilbert
replied for 48 years. The Chair then asked if in the 48 years if Mr. Gilbert ever had
cases that they left so open in concept, and Mr. Gilbert replied in 50% of the cases they
had. Mr. Gilbert said they were not asking for any zoning variances.

Mr. Greenberg asked if approval of this zone change required the removal of the
Special Permit. Mr. Gilbert said they would still need to go to the City to formally
remove the Special Permit and racing could continue until it is removed.

Ms. DiLeo asked if the purchase contract forced him to sell. Mr. Gilbert said he did not
read the purchase contract. Ms. DiLeo felt Mr. Gilbert was dismissive and disrespectful
to this public body and believed it was their business to look into this deeply to see if the
future development will support the current economy in this area of the City. Ms. DiLeo
knew thousands of people rely on this industry and it was unimaginable to her of why
Mr. Gilbert would be so dismissive on these individuals’ livelihoods being threatened if
the industry were to go away.

Ricardo Romero said Turf Paradise was an iconic place and there could be concerns
of poor management.

Gregory Freeman provided insight to how there are many ways a real estate
transaction can be broken.

Mr. Gilbert said the primary negative effect of postponing the case is it leaves some
uncertainty to the client that the zoning will move forward. Mr. Gilbert clarified he
represented the buyer of Turf Paradise.

Comments from Committee
Will Novak felt what CED had to say about the case was not relevant and added that
they did not do the most basic calculation of what the property taxes would be. Mr.
Novak said he felt Mr. Gilbert spoke on both sides and indicated the applicant was
demeaning and did a poor job for his client. Mr. Novak believed the matter needed to be
tabled and recommended for the community to look at HP landmark designation for the
folks interested in horse track racing.



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 589
Deer Valley Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-31-23-3
August 10, 2023
Page 7


Ms. DiLeo said this was a lot of commercial in the area and questioned if this was right
for the area. Ms. DiLeo felt one strip of land had the say which could impact people
economically and traffic in the area and her opinion was the area would be more
appropriate as residential. Ms. DiLeo felt this was a historic location and to think an
everyday commercial building would be disheartening. Ms. DiLeo was concerned with
litigation and if there was a chance to preserve the location for the community, and
believed they needed more concrete information to change the zoning.

Mr. Lopez-Biggs said the owner could demolish the whole thing and they were strictly
looking at the zoning and felt there was not enough information for the entire 250-acre
property. Mr. Lopez-Biggs said there was not enough information to make a decision.

Ms. Hoffman said the Special Permits were still over the properties, and the zoning
would not vest until the site plan was approved. Ms. Hoffman’s biggest concern was the
neighbors saying they did not get sufficient notice and wanted to ensure the public had
a voice, and felt the case needed to be postponed a month or two for time
conversations to take place. Ms. Hoffman suggested making a motion for a
continuance.

Mr. Greenberg said this was a zoning case on one strip of land. Mr. Greenberg did not
see the reason to postpone the case and said if it was up to them for Turf Paradise to
stay and if it goes he felt this would only allow a new owner to develop the land
properly. Mr. Greenberg stated if Turf Paradise goes away that they would not need a
big vacant site.

Mr. Freeman said he represents Bell Road Business Alliance and he verified he
received the communication. Mr. Freeman added they are doing a rezoning issue and
felt the zoning question should be answered.

Mr. Virgil mentioned that there was an airport where Turf Paradise is located.

Chair Grossman said a portion of the Board wants to postpone, which requires a
motion to recommend a continuance, and a portion who want to vote today. Chair
Grossman reminded that this was the first hurdle of the public process to go through
and added there was a desire to modify the stipulation for vehicular traffic from Tierra
Buena Lane.

MOTION #1:
Committee Member Keith Greenberg made a motion to recommend approval of Z-31-
23-3 per staff recommendation. Vice Chair Matthew Kenney seconded the motion.

Chair Grossman presented a secondary motion to approve with an added stipulation
that the applicant would have obligation to come back to the Village Planning
Committee at the time they plan to develop the site. Gregory Freeman seconded the
motion.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 590
Deer Valley Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-31-23-3
August 10, 2023
Page 8



Mr. Gilbert said they would have an ability to get feedback and the Village Planning
Committee (VPC) could recommend changes to the site plan. Ms. Hoffman clarified
that there was no obligation to make those changes as long as it meets the code.

Chair Grossman said the intent was for there to be a public format. Braden Lopez-
Biggs said there would be nothing that could be done legally make the applicant make
the changes. Mr. Lopez-Biggs said if the Committee was worried about transparency,
they lost their opportunity with the 6-6 to continue the general plan amendment.

The secondary motion was made by Chair Grossman seconded by Gregory Freeman
and amended by Trilese DiLeo. Ms. DiLeo said the motion was to make a secondary
motion for them to come back to the VPC and amend to notify everyone that signed a
comment card of the preliminary site plan meeting.

VOTE #1:
6-6, motion to recommend approval of Z-31-23-3 with an added stipulation to come
back with a site plan to the VPC and amended to require the notification of all those who
filled out a comment card of the Preliminary Site Plan meeting fails with Committee
Members Davenport, Freeman, Greenberg, Sutphen, Vice Chair Kenney and Chair
Grossman in favor; and Committee Members DiLeo, Lopez-Biggs, Hoffman, Novak,
Romero and Virgil in opposition.

MOTION #2:
Committee Member Keith Greenberg motioned to recommend approval of Z-31-23-3
per staff recommendation. Vice Chair Matthew Kenney seconded the motion.

VOTE #2:
6-6, motion to recommend approval of Z-31-23-3 per staff recommendation fails with
Committee Members Davenport, Freeman, Greenberg, Sutphen, Vice Chair Kenney
and Chair Grossman in favor; and Committee Members DiLeo, Lopez-Biggs, Hoffman,
Novak, Romero and Virgil in opposition.

MOTION #3:
Committee Member Braden Lopez-Biggs motioned to recommend a continuance of
Z-31-23-3 to the October VPC meeting. Committee Member Trilese DiLeo seconded
the motion.

VOTE #3:
7-5, motion to continue case Z-31-23-3 to the October meeting passes with Committee
Members DiLeo, Freeman, Lopez-Biggs, Hoffman, Novak, Romero, and Virgil in favor;
and Committee Members Davenport, Greenberg, Sutphen, Vice Chair Kenney and
Chair Grossman opposed.



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 591
Deer Valley Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-31-23-3
August 10, 2023
Page 9


STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 592
ATTACHMENT D




To: City of Phoenix Planning Commission Date: March 7, 2024

From: Racelle Escolar, AICP
Principal Planner

Subject: ITEM NO. 8 (Z-31-23-3) – APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET EAST OF THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF 19TH AVENUE AND TIERRA BUENA LANE

The purpose of this memo is to recommend modified and additional stipulations in
response to stipulations that are agreed upon by the applicant and an adjacent
neighbor.

Rezoning Case No. Z-31-23-3 is a request to rezone 28.92 acres from S-1 SP (Ranch
or Farm Residence, Special Permit) and C-2 SP (Intermediate Commercial, Special
Permit), to CP/GCP (Commerce Park / General Commerce Park option) to allow
commerce park.

The Deer Valley Village Planning Committee heard this request on August 10, 2023 and
continued the case to October, by a vote of 7-5. There was no quorum at the October
12, 2023 and November 16, 2023 meetings.

The applicant has been working with the adjacent neighbor to address concerns. The
applicant and neighbor have agreed on the stipulations reflected below.

Staff recommends approval, per the modified stipulations in bold font below.

1. GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO THE SITE PLAN DATE STAMPED MARCH
7, 2024 AS IT APPLIES TO THE 28-ACRE SITE THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF
Z-31-23-3, AS MODIFIED BY THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS AND
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

1 Required landscape setbacks ADJACENT TO STREETS shall be planted with
2. minimum 2-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on center
or in equivalent groupings, with five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

3. A MINIMUM 20-FOOT LANDSCAPED SETBACK SHALL BE PROVIDED
ALONG PERIMETER LOT LINES NOT ADJACENT TO A STREET. THIS
STANDARD SHALL NOT APPLY IF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY IS ZONED
C-1, C-2, C-3, A-1, A-2, COMMERCE PARK. REQUIRED LANDSCAPE
SETBACKS SHALL PLANTED WITH 50% MINIMUM 2-INCH CALIPER AND
50% MINIMUM 3-INCH CALIPER LARGE CANOPY DROUGHT-TOLERANT
TREES, 20 FEET ON CENTER, OR IN EQUIVALENT GROUPINGS, WITH
FIVE 5-GALLON SHRUBS PER TREE, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

Page 593
Z-31-23-3 Planning Commission Backup Memo
March 7, 2024



2 Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
4. constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrast parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

3 A minimum of 2% of the required parking spaces shall include Electric Vehicle
5. (EV) Installed infrastructure, and a minimum of 8% of the required parking
spaces shall include EV Capable infrastructure, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

4 All nonresidential uses over 5,000 square feet floor area shall provide one
6. bicycle parking space per 25 vehicle parking spaces, with a maximum of 25
spaces. Bicycle parking shall be provided through Inverted U and/or artistic
racks located near the front of offices and installed per the requirements of
Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department. Artistic racks shall adhere to the City
of Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle
Master Plan.

5 A minimum of 10% of the required bicycle parking spaces shall include
7. standard electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

6 A minimum of 10% of the required shrubs, shall be a milkweed or other native
8. nectar species, and shall be planted in groups of three or more, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

7 One outdoor employee resting area of no less than 400 square feet, or two
9. 200-square foot areas shall be provided for each warehouse/office building on
site. Each required pedestrian area shall include a minimum of two pedestrian
seating benches, constructed of quality and durable materials, and shaded to a
minimum of 75% using minimum 2-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant
shade trees and/or architectural shade, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

8 A minimum 6-foot-wide detached sidewalk and a minimum 10-foot-wide
10. landscape area shall be constructed between back of curb and sidewalk on the
east side of 19th Avenue from Turf Paradise Road to Tierra Buena Lane,
planted as follows, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk, large canopy, drought-tolerant
shade trees planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings.

b. Drought tolerant shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers to
achieve a minimum of 75% live vegetative ground coverage at maturity.


Page 594
Z-31-23-3 Planning Commission Backup Memo
March 7, 2024


Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

9 A minimum 30-feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the north side of Tierra
11. Buena Lane, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. The improvements shall be consistent with the Minor Collector cross
section and constructed with a minimum 5-foot-wide sidewalk with a
minimum 8-foot-wide landscape area between back of curb and
sidewalk, planted as follows:

(1) Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk, large canopy, drought-
tolerant shade trees planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent
groupings.

(2) Drought tolerant shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers to
achieve a minimum of 75% live vegetative ground coverage at
maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

10 The existing traffic signal at the Phelps Road and 19th Avenue intersection
12. shall be fully funded and reconstructed to meet City of Phoenix standards, as
approved by the Street Transportation Department.

11 Vehicular access shall not be permitted to Tierra Buena Lane.
13.

12 A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) shall be submitted to the City for this development.
14. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is reviewed
and approved by the Street Transportation Department. The TIS shall include
signal warrant analysis for 19th Avenue and Grandview Road, and Tierra
Buena Lane and Greenway Parkway. If the approved TIS determines that a
signal is warranted at any of these intersections, the developer shall be
required to fund 100% of the cost and construct the signal, if the TIS does not
warrant the signal, the developer shall be required contribute 25% of traffic
signal cost in an escrow account to the Street Transportation Department. If the
signal is installed by others, the development shall be responsible for 100% of
the cost for signal relocation and/or modifications.

13 Replace unused driveways with sidewalk and curb and gutter. Also, replace
15. any broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps on all streets and
upgrade all off-site improvements to be in compliance with current ADA
guidelines.

Page 595
Z-31-23-3 Planning Commission Backup Memo
March 7, 2024



14 In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
16. developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

15 Prior to preliminary FINAL site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
17. Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.

18. ANY OUTDOOR STORAGE AREAS SHALL BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF
100 FEET FROM A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT.

19. PARKING LOT AREA(S) SHALL BE LANDSCAPED PER THE STANDARDS
OF PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE §624.E.4.E, THE C-3 (GENERAL
COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT.

20. NOISE-GENERATING EQUIPMENT, E.G. BUT NOT LIMITED TO AIR
CHILLERS AND GENERATORS, SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 300
FEET FROM A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OR SHALL BE SHIELDED BY A
BUILDING OR SOUND MITIGATION WALL TO ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED
NOISE LEVEL.

21. PARKING LOT AND SECURITY LIGHTING SHALL NOT EXCEED A
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 15 FEET INCLUDING LAMP, POLE, AND BASE
WITHIN 200 FEET OF A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.

22. ALL ON-SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO PREVENT DIRECT
VISIBILITY OF THE LIGHT SOURCE FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY.

23. LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED WITH CUT-OFF FIXTURES AND
DEFLECTORS TO DIRECT LIGHT DOWNWARD AND LIMIT ON-SITE
LIGHTING LEVELS TO A MAXIMUM OF ONE FOOT CANDLE AT THE
PROPERTY LINE.

24. SIGNAGE SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF A COMPREHENSIVE
SIGN PLAN PER THE PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE §705.E.2.




Page 596
ATTACHMENT E


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
March 7, 2024

ITEM NO: 8
DISTRICT NO.: 3
SUBJECT:

Application #: Z-31-23-3 (Companion Case GPA-DV-1-23-3)
(Continued from November 2, 2023)
Location: Approximately 500 feet east of the northeast corner of 19th Avenue and
Tierra Buena Lane
From: S-1 SP and C-2 SP
To: CP/GCP
Acreage: 28.92
Proposal: Commerce Park
Applicant: Jerry Simms, TP Racing, LLLP
Owner: Jerry Simms, TP Racing, LLLP
Representative: Paul E. Gilbert, Gilbert Blilie, PLLC

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Deer Valley 8/10/2023 Continued. Vote: 7-5.
Deer Valley 10/12/2023 No quorum.
Deer Valley 11/16/2023 No quorum.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the staff memo dated March 7, 2024.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Acting Vice-Chairperson Boyd made a MOTION to approve Z-31-23 per the staff
memo dated March 7, 2024.

Maker: Acting Vice-Chairperson Boyd
Second: Gorraiz
Vote: 7-1 (Perez)
Absent: Busching
Opposition Present: Yes

Findings:

1. The proposal is consistent with the existing and proposed General Plan Land Use Map
designation of Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce/Business Park).

2. The proposal provides a diversity of commerce park type uses nearby the North I-17
Major Employment Center.

3. As stipulated, the proposal supports efforts from various plans, such as the Monarch
Butterfly Pledge, the Tree, and Shade Master Plan, the Complete Streets Guiding
Principles, the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan, and the Transportation
Electrification Action Plan.

Page 597
Stipulations:

1. GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO THE SITE PLAN DATE STAMPED MARCH 7, 2024
AS IT APPLIES TO THE 28-ACRE SITE THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF Z-31-23-3, AS
MODIFIED BY THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS AND APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

1 Required landscape setbacks ADJACENT TO STREETS shall be planted with
2. minimum 2-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings, with five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

3. A MINIMUM 20-FOOT LANDSCAPED SETBACK SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG
PERIMETER LOT LINES NOT ADJACENT TO A STREET. THIS STANDARD SHALL
NOT APPLY IF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY IS ZONED C-1, C-2, C-3, A-1, A-2,
COMMERCE PARK. REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACKS SHALL PLANTED WITH
50% MINIMUM 2-INCH CALIPER AND 50% MINIMUM 3-INCH CALIPER LARGE
CANOPY DROUGHT-TOLERANT TREES, 20 FEET ON CENTER, OR IN
EQUIVALENT GROUPINGS, WITH FIVE 5-GALLON SHRUBS PER TREE, AS
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

2 Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be constructed
4. of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments that
visually contrast parking and drive aisle surfaces, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

3 A minimum of 2% of the required parking spaces shall include Electric Vehicle (EV)
5. Installed infrastructure, and a minimum of 8% of the required parking spaces shall
include EV Capable infrastructure, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

4 All nonresidential uses over 5,000 square feet floor area shall provide one bicycle
6. parking space per 25 vehicle parking spaces, with a maximum of 25 spaces. Bicycle
parking shall be provided through Inverted U and/or artistic racks located near the front
of offices and installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. Artistic racks
shall adhere to the City of Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.

5 A minimum of 10% of the required bicycle parking spaces shall include standard
7. electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

6 A minimum of 10% of the required shrubs, shall be a milkweed or other native nectar
8. species, and shall be planted in groups of three or more, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

7 One outdoor employee resting area of no less than 400 square feet, or two 200-square
9. foot areas shall be provided for each warehouse/office building on site. Each required
pedestrian area shall include a minimum of two pedestrian seating benches,
constructed of quality and durable materials, and shaded to a minimum of 75% using
minimum 2-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant shade trees and/or architectural
shade, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.


Page 598
8 A minimum 6-foot-wide detached sidewalk and a minimum 10-foot-wide landscape
10. area shall be constructed between back of curb and sidewalk on the east side of 19th
Avenue from Turf Paradise Road to Tierra Buena Lane, planted as follows, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk, large canopy, drought-tolerant shade trees
planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings.

b. Drought tolerant shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers to achieve a
minimum of 75% live vegetative ground coverage at maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

9 A minimum 30-feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the north side of Tierra Buena
11. Lane, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. The improvements shall be consistent with the Minor Collector cross section
and constructed with a minimum 5-foot-wide sidewalk with a minimum 8-foot-
wide landscape area between back of curb and sidewalk, planted as follows:

(1) Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk, large canopy, drought-tolerant
shade trees planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings.

(2) Drought tolerant shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers to
achieve a minimum of 75% live vegetative ground coverage at maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

10 The existing traffic signal at the Phelps Road and 19th Avenue intersection shall be
12. fully funded and reconstructed to meet City of Phoenix standards, as approved by the
Street Transportation Department.

11 Vehicular access shall not be permitted to Tierra Buena Lane.
13.

12 A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) shall be submitted to the City for this development. No
14. preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is reviewed and approved
by the Street Transportation Department. The TIS shall include signal warrant analysis
for 19th Avenue and Grandview Road, and Tierra Buena Lane and Greenway
Parkway. If the approved TIS determines that a signal is warranted at any of these
intersections, the developer shall be required to fund 100% of the cost and construct
the signal, if the TIS does not warrant the signal, the developer shall be required
contribute 25% of traffic signal cost in an escrow account to the Street Transportation
Department. If the signal is installed by others, the development shall be responsible
for 100% of the cost for signal relocation and/or modifications.

13 Replace unused driveways with sidewalk and curb and gutter. Also, replace any
15. broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps on all streets and upgrade all
off-site improvements to be in compliance with current ADA guidelines.


Page 599
14 In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
16. developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33- foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

15 Prior to preliminary FINAL site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
17. Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa
County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

18. ANY OUTDOOR STORAGE AREAS SHALL BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF 100 FEET
FROM A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT.

19. PARKING LOT AREA(S) SHALL BE LANDSCAPED PER THE STANDARDS OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE §624.E.4.E, THE C-3 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL)
DISTRICT.

20. NOISE-GENERATING EQUIPMENT, E.G. BUT NOT LIMITED TO AIR CHILLERS
AND GENERATORS, SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 300 FEET FROM A
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OR SHALL BE SHIELDED BY A BUILDING OR SOUND
MITIGATION WALL TO ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED NOISE LEVEL.

21. PARKING LOT AND SECURITY LIGHTING SHALL NOT EXCEED A MAXIMUM
HEIGHT OF 15 FEET INCLUDING LAMP, POLE, AND BASE WITHIN 200 FEET OF A
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.

22. ALL ON-SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO PREVENT DIRECT VISIBILITY
OF THE LIGHT SOURCE FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY.

23. LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED WITH CUT-OFF FIXTURES AND DEFLECTORS
TO DIRECT LIGHT DOWNWARD AND LIMIT ON-SITE LIGHTING LEVELS TO A
MAXIMUM OF ONE FOOT CANDLE AT THE PROPERTY LINE.

24. SIGNAGE SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN
PLAN PER THE PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE §705.E.2.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact Teleia
Galaviz at 602-291-2559, teleia.galaviz@phoenix.gov, TTY: Use 7-1-1.




Page 600
ATTACHMENT F


From: Stephen Nolan
To: Matteo Moric
Subject: Fw: Agenda for Special Racing Commission meeting, Tues. Dec 5th, 2023 @ 2:30
Date: Monday, December 4, 2023 2:56:19 PM




----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Stephen Nolan
To: Council District 3 PCC ; Debra Stark
Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 at 02:54:46 PM MST
Subject: Agenda for Special Racing Commission meeting, Tues. Dec 5th, 2023 @ 2:30

Link to Agenda
https://gaming.az.gov/file/4434/download?token=UsTxiVZ7 [gaming.az.gov]




Page 601
From: Stephen Nolan
To: Rudy Casillas; Ana Armenta; Council District 3 PCC; Debra Stark; Matteo Moric; Jackie Johnson; Caitlin Caputo;
Brian Duncan
Subject: Consideration for additional item to be placed on AZ Racing Commission Special Meeting agenda, (companion to
any request for race dates).
Date: Monday, December 4, 2023 7:37:05 AM


Good morning,

In an attempt to be completely transparent,I respectfully request an addition item be placed on any
agenda of a "Special Commission Meeting". I believe discussion is warranted concerning the permittee's
attempt to rezone a parcel of land that falls inside the fenced portion of the property that falls under the
jurisdiction of the Arizona Department of Racing, a division of the Arizona Department of Gaming and the
ARIZONA RACING COMMISSION. I am concerned that there is misinformation, as it relates to the
application for dates and the affect that the rezoning could have on Arizona's Agricultural Entertainment
Industries of Horse Racing and Breeding.

Many have said that the rezoning of the property would have no affect on racing. And I find that statement
very troublesome and not completely the whole story, thus this request for more transparency.

As mentioned above, the parcel of land trying to be rezoned falls in that part of the property that is
required to run a race meet. Therefore, it falls under the regulatory authority of the Racing Commission
leading me to request clarification as to whether the permittee has the "unfettered personal property
rights" to request rezoning without Commission approval.

It was clear that the Arizona Legislature in a recent legislation (2019, SB1144, resulted in Arizona
Revised Statute Title #5, Chapter #1 5-117) has clarified that the Permittee does not have "unfettered
authority" when it comes to regulations that fall under the regulatory umbrella of the Arizona Racing
Commission. This request is a companion to any request for dates. The industries need to know the facts
and an Attorney General review of the legal authority of the Arizona Racing Commission as it relates to
the attempt to rezone the regulated parcel of property required to run a race meet. This is a very unusual
situation that has not come to the attention of regulators as other portions of the property, that had been
rezoned, had not come before the Arizona Racing Commission as those portions of property they were
not in jeopardy of redevelopment. And is that redevelopment in the best interest of Breeding and Racing
in Arizona.

Director Casillas, I copied you a communication dated November 20th, 2023, to many more authorities,
voicing my concerns as it relates to the rezoning planned and the potential damage it could do to the
Racing and Breeding Industries in Arizona. I urge caution, and I do not understand the urgency in
rezoning if in fact there is a planned race meet through early May.

Sincerely,
Stephen H. Nolan




Page 602
From: Stephen Nolan
To: Council District 3 PCC; Debra Stark; Matteo Moric; Jackie Johnson; Caitlin Caputo; Rudy Casillas; Brian Duncan
Subject: Turf Paradise Property rezoning applications Z-31-23-3 (companion GPA-DV-1-23-3)
Date: Monday, November 20, 2023 9:29:39 PM
Attachments: IMG_1479 (1).PNG



Good morning,

The reason for this communication is to inform City of Phoenix District #3 and Councilwoman Stark and
Staff of some information as it relates to the application(s) mentioned above.

I wish to voice my concern as it is related to the August 3rd, 2023, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT STAFF
ANALYSIS (REVISED) recommending the approval of application #GPA-DV-23-1-3, (and as it relates to
application #Z-31-23-3) as much has changed since the August 3rd, revision. It appears, that the original
application(s) submitted by applicant James Watson of CT Investors, is not the same application(s) that is trying to
move forward now. For instance, referring to the June 5th, 2023 letter sent out included a conceptual site plan
showing data centers with the thought that the perimeter of the Turf Paradise property would be more
AESTHETICALLY pleasurable to our community. That plan is no longer in play and the information disseminated
prior to the August 3rd revised analysis is not the same information that currently exists at the Turf Paradise
property. The entire property is in total disarray and in deplorable condition. The application(s) are now in Simms
name, therefore, I respectfully request another review and analysis by staff addressing all the changes that have
been made prior to these applications moving forward.

THERE IS AN EXTREME NEED FOR TOTAL TRANSPARENCY AS IT IS THE CURRENT OWNER (SIMMS),
HAS 'SINGLE HANDEDLY" ALLOWED THE TURF PARADISE PROPERTY AND ARIZONA'S AGRICULTURAL
ENTERTAINMENT BUSINESSES OF HORSE RACING AND BREEDING (APPROX $100mil ECONOMIC
IMPACT TO THE STATE OF ARIZONA) TO SIGNIFICANTLY DECLINE. THE CURRENT OWNER (SIMMS) HAS
SUCKED MOST OF THE LIFE OUT OF THE VEGETATION ON THE PROPERTY BY FAILING TO WATER THE
PLANTS AND DO NORNAL LANDSCAPING UPDATES AND HAS CONTINUALLY (FOR 2 DECADES) FAILED
TO DO ANY UPDATES TO INFRASTRUCTURE OF THE PROPERTY AND BUILDINGS (APPROXIMATELY 60
STRUCTURES). IN ADDITION, THE CURRENT OWNER (SIMMS) HAS AND CURRENTLY CONTINUES TO
FAIL TO FULFILL HIS LEGAL OBLIGATION TO HOLD A RACE MEET (FROM THE FALL OF 2023 THROUGH
SPRING OF 2024) AS REQUIRED BY A 3 YEAR PERMIT GRANTED TO TURF PARADISE (SIMMS) BY THE
ARIZONA RACING COMMISSION AT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE AZ DEPARTMENT OF RACING, A
DIVISION OF THE AZ DEPARTMENT OF GAMING, WHICH DOES NOT EXPIRE UNTIL JUNE 30TH, 2024.

There are are many moving parts when dealing with the application and the applicant (Simms) and the
requested rezoning of the Turf Paradise property.
One such concern is the fact there are litigation(s) that involve the property in question that were initiated
in 2010 and involves a "land swap". (referencing Maricopa County Superior Court Case CV2010-022308
which has been Stayed pending the resolution of Maricopa County Superior Case #2016-000505 which I
believe is in the Court of Appeals). Because of the litigations, it is speculative to know if the property could
close on a purchase agreement pending the final adjudication of such cases. Because of this uncertainty,
I urge caution, as if the rezoning is allowed, and a sale is then tied up due to these outstanding litigations,
then the Turf Paradise property could potentially sit empty until such time the litigations are finally
adjudicated (as there is no end in sight). This attempted rezoning will replace the current status of
"Special Use Permit, Horse Racing".
According to a letter dated June 5th, 2023, sent by Attorneys, Beus Gilbert McGroder, this rezoning if
allowed "will become effective upon the ceasing of horse racing operations and the redevelopment of the
property or portions thereof"... It is now known that the ceasing of horse racing operations terminates on
December 31st, 2023. And if the smallest part of the property is redeveloped the whole property is
rezoned. I hope you understand the concern this raises, as this community watched the property on the
west side of !9th avenue (across from the Turf Paradise property) sit empty for near 2 decades as that
property was tied up in litigation.




Page 603
There are many other concerns, too many to address at this time. I wish to remind you that many people
showed up to speak on these applications at the Deer Valley Village Committee Meeting last Thursday
evening Nov. 16th, 2023 and were turned away as the meeting had no quorum. That was through no fault
of the community members wishing their voices be heard. And in the spirit of the Arizona Open Meeting
Laws, I feel that these applications should follow the process as originally set, (requiring an updated
review and analysis by staff as it now relates to Jerry Simms, the new applicant) and being heard by the
Deer Valley Village Committee, then to the City of Phoenix Planning Commission, and then to the City of
Phoenix City Council. To follow this procedure, it would allow for the proper time for more information to
become available to those empowered to make the best decision for our community.

There is said to be another purchase contract concerning this property and very little due diligence has
been done and it seems skeptical that it will be able to make it to the finish line in the near future. A
project of this magnitude which will be disruptive to our community for years, needs a proper review and
analysis and as Jerry Simms states that this decision will have an impact on about 5000 jobs in our
community. He stated this at the Racing Commission Meeting on October 12th, 2023 and has it published
on the Turf Paradise website. (See attached)


Thank you for your attention to this matter as many in this community ask for more transparency and
simply just want to be heard on this matter. I look forward to you response.




Page 604
Page 605
Page 606
Page 607
From: Stephen Nolan
To: Matteo Moric; Debra Stark
Subject: Turf Paradise Property rezoning cases.
Date: Friday, October 20, 2023 12:58:05 PM


I want to give you a quick update.
I have filed the following public records request with the planning and development department:

Public Records Request
R005336-102023 [cityofphoenixaz.govqa.us]
I would greatly appreciate a copy of the new application filed for Zoning Case No. #Z-31-23-3. In addition,
there is an accompanying Application to Amend the General Plan, application #GPA-DV-1-23-3, also on file
with Planning and Development. Could I get an update (and copy) of the status is of application #GPA-DV-1-
23-3? Thank YOU for your attention to this matter!
Status : Waiting for Clarification

Mr. Moric, Could you help me understand the process to move forward, such as a new notice being sent out? Or is
this item automatically put on next months agenda and when is next months meeting(s) (as there is confusion to
the dates that are publicly posted on the corner of 19th Ave and Tierra Buena)? Or is this meeting rescheduled
prior to the next months agenda?

I wish to voice my concern as it is related to the August 3rd, 2023, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT STAFF
ANALYSIS (REVISED) recommending the approval of application #GPA-DV-23-1-3, (and as it relates to
application #Z-31-23-3) as much has changed since the August 3rd, revision.

It appears, that the original application(s) submitted by applicant James Watson of CT Investors, is not the same
application(s) that is trying to move forward now. For instance, referring to the June 5th, 2023 letter sent out
included a conceptual site plan showing data centers and the thought that the perimeter of the Turf Paradise
property would be more AESTHETICALLY pleasurable to our community. That plan is no longer in play and the
information disseminated prior to the August 3rd revised analysis is not the same information that currently exists
at the Turf Paradise property. The entire property is in total disarray and in deplorable condition. And if the
application(s) are reverting back to the current owner (SIMMS);

THEN THERE IS AN EXTREME NEED FOR TOTAL TRANSPARENCY AS IT IS THE CURRENT OWNER
(SIMMS), THAT HAS 'SINGLE HANDEDLY" ALLOWED THE TURF PARADISE PROPERTY AND ARIZONA'S
AGRICULTURAL ENTERTAINMENT BUSINESSES OF HORSE RACING AND BREEDING (APPROX $100mil
AZ ECONOMIC IMPACT) TO SIGNIFICANTLY DECLINE. THE CURRENT OWNER (SIMMS) HAS SUCKED
MOST OF THE LIFE OUT OF THE VEGETATION ON THE PROPERTY BY FAILING TO WATER THE PLANTS
AND DO NORNAL LANDSCAPING UPDATES AND HAS CONTINUED (FOR 2 DECADES) FAILED TO DO ANY
UPDATES TO INFRASTRUCTURE OF THE PROPERTY AND BUILDINGS (APPROXIMATELY 60
STRUCTURES). IN ADDITION, THE CURRENT OWNER (SIMMS) HAS AND CURRENTLY CONTINUES TO
FAIL TO FULFILL HIS LEGAL OBLIGATION TO HOLD A RACE MEET (FROM THE FALL OF 2023 THROUGH
SPRING OF 2024) AS REQUIRED BY A 3 YEAR PERMIT GRANTED TO TURF PARADISE (SIMMS) BY THE
ARIZONA RACING COMMISSION AT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE AZ DEPARTMENT OF RACING, A
DIVISION OF THE AZ DEPARTMENT OF GAMING, WHICH DOES NOT EXPIRE UNTIL JUNE 30TH, 2024.

I respectfully request another review and analysis addressing all the changes that have been made prior to these
applications moving forward. This request is to require the appropriate transparency expected, following the
guidelines of the "Open Meeting Laws".

Please forward this communication to the Deer Valley Village Planning Committee Members and City of
Phoenix Planning Commission Members and all other interested parties.

Sincerely,
Stephen H Nolan
1120 W. Le Marche Ave
Phoenix Az, 85023


Page 608
From: Matteo Moric
To: Stephen Nolan
Cc: Sarah Stockham
Subject: RE: Turf Paradise property cases
Date: Tuesday, October 10, 2023 8:27:00 PM
Attachments: image003.png
image004.emz
image005.png


Hello Stephen,

Thank you for your input. I will forward your email to the Deer Valley Village Planning Committee.

For your information:
The applicant on a rezoning application can change. They just need to let the City of Phoenix
Planning and Development Department know the contact information for the new applicant
and sign an updated application form, which they have completed.
Approved zoning means the zoning was approved but not vested with a final site plan.
And I can not speculate on why the owners many years ago did not include the subject
approximate 28 acres into their earlier request.

Thank you,



Matteo Moric
Planner II* Village
Planning and Development Department
Long Range Planning Division
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
matteo.moric@phoenix.gov
(602) 261-8235




Mission: Planning, Development and Preservation for a Better Phoenix



From: Stephen Nolan
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2023 8:42 AM
To: Matteo Moric
Subject: Turf Paradise property cases

Please forward to Deer Valley Planning Committee Members and all appropriate.




Page 609
I will update you concerning the two dates that have come and gone as to the reason these cases were
continued from the August 10th Planning Committee Meeting.
First, the due diligence deadline (of September 15th) passed and the rezoning applicant, James Watson
of CT Investors, has walked away from the project to purchase Turf Paradise.
Secondly, the Arizona Racing Commission had a meeting on September 28th, at which time, current Turf
Paradise owner, Jerry Simms spoke (min 38:00-40:12), (715th Arizona Racing Commission Meeting
[youtube.com]) in support of the Racing Industry remaining at Turf Paradise and that is why he chose the
new prospective buyer.

[youtube.com]




715th Arizona Racing Commission Meeting



The above leads me to request further information as it pertains to item #4 scheduled on the agenda of
the Oct. 12th, Deer Valley Village Planning Committee Meeting.
Applications, GPA-DV-1-23-3, and Z-31-23 were submitted by James Watson of CT Investors, and paid
for by such on May 19th, 2023.
Now knowing (through numerous media sources and Mr. Simms statements) that Mr. James Watson of
CT Investors have walked away from this purchase project.
1) ARE THESE APPLICATIONS TRANSFERRABLE TO ANOTHER ENTITY?

In the June 28th, "Outreach Meeting", it was stated that the current zoning of the Turf Paradise property
was done in approximately 2002, and was "approved" as is, but was never "finalized" by the City of
Phoenix.
2) CAN I GET AN EXPLANATION TO THIS PROCESS OF "APPROVAL BUT NEVER FINALIZED"?
(Many things have changed to the immediate surrounding of the Turf Paradise property that were not
here in 2002, including Walmart and Sam's Club which have had a major impact to the traffic in our
community. If in fact that this technical matter is a concern, I would greatly appreciate it investigated and
a response if these cases move forward).
Additionally, at that same "Outreach Meeting" a question remains unanswered?
3) When this 2002 rezoning occurred to some of the Turf Paradise property, why was this particular 28
acre parcel left out of that rezoning at that time? (this is very peculiar as it is in the middle of the property
and a major part of the current land necessary for racing).

As I stated at the Aug 10th Planning Committee Meeting, there are many moving parts (that i believe
relevant to this process) when it comes to Turf Paradise and Owner Jerry Simms. Litigations that extend
over 13 years and one in particular that involves the State Department of Racing and the Arizona Racing
Commission that has made it to the State Supreme Court.

I wish to submit the following two photos. The first is a visual of some of the the impact that Arizona
Racing (mostly at Turf Paradise) has on the entire Arizona community. Second picture is what Turf
Paradise (on it's website) states the need for the 5000 jobs it saves.

There is a regularly scheduled Racing Commission Meeting scheduled for Thursday morning at 10:00am.



Page 610
There is not an agenda out at this time. I will forward it accordingly including a link to join with a zoom call.

Thank You,
Stephen H. Nolan
1120 W. Le Marche Ave
Phoenix, Az 85023




Page 611
From: Matteo Moric
To: Stephen Nolan
Cc: gfreeman@mpbreality.net; debstarkaz@gmail.com
Subject: GPA-DV-1-23-3 and Z-31-23-3 (Approximately 500 feet east of the northeast corner of 19th Avenue and Tierra
Buena Lane
Date: Tuesday, September 5, 2023 5:47:00 PM
Attachments: image002.png


Good afternoon Mr. Nolan,

Thank you for your interest in these cases.

The Planning Commission agenda items you are speaking of related to the Turf Paradise site (GPA-
DV-1-23-3 and Z-31-23-3) are being continued.

On August 10, the Deer Valley Village Planning Committee made a recommendation of approval of
the General Plan Amendment, and recommended a continuance of the Rezoning Case to the
October VPC meeting. The VPC meeting is planned to be on October 12, 2023 at the Deer Valley
Community Center.

If you have any correspondence of support or opposition please feel free to forward those onto me.


Thank you,



Matteo Moric
Planner II* Village
Planning and Development Department
Long Range Planning Division
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
matteo.moric@phoenix.gov
(602) 261-8235




Mission: Planning, Development and Preservation for a Better Phoenix



From: Stephen Nolan
Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2023 3:58 PM
To: Matteo Moric ; gfreeman@mpbreality.net;
debstarkaz@gmail.com



Page 612
Subject: Re: This is Greg Freeman from the Turf Paradise meeting last night

Good afternoon,
I want to thank you for being available to answer some questions as I am not familiar with the rezoning
process.

Concerning the agenda items #4 and #5 scheduled for the City of Phoenix Planning Commission Hearing
at 6:00 pm, September 7th, 2023.

I respectfully request clarification as I had left the August 10th, Deer Valley Village Planning Committee
meeting thinking that at least one if not both agenda items #4 &5 above were to be tabled until the
October meeting. The reason cited was to allow 2 important dates to occur in September. The Next
Racing Commission Meeting, now rescheduled for September 28th from a date of September 14th. And
the September due diligence deadline for the rezoning applicants, Mr. Watson to move forward with the
purchase of the property wishing to be rezoned. I feel there are numerous issues that remain
unanswered, and it is premature to move forward without gathering all possible information to be able to
make the best decision for the community.
Many factual and legal reasons can be provided in support of the continuation of these agenda items to
another date in order to allow for these meetings and deadlines to pass. A tremendous amount of
information will be gathered from the results of due diligence deadline and Racing Commission meeting.
Therefore, I respectfully request that the agenda items #4 & #5 be tabled to another date.
Sincerely,

Stephen H Nolan
1120 w Le Marche ave, Phoenix Az 85023
On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 10:03:10 AM MST, Greg Freeman wrote:



Thank you for the email, Stephen.



I just got back in town from a trip to see my wife’s family over the holiday, so pardon my delayed
response. I would love for us to meet so I can get some insight into the history of the property and hear a
bit more about things on the horse racing side. We can meet together or with other interested parties that
you see fit to include.



In this next week, I have availability to meet in the evening between 6pm and 8pm on Monday, Tuesday
or Wednesday. Let me know if one of those days and or times work for you.



Greg Freeman
PROPERTY MANAGER
gfreeman@mpbrealty.net | mpbrealty.net [mpbrealty.net]
[mpbrealty.net]O 602.280.1010 EXT 108     F 602.234.3880
1450 EAST INDIAN SCHOOL RD, SUITE 104 [MPBREALTY.NET]

PHOENIX, AZ 85014 [MPBREALTY.NET]




Page 613
From: Stephen Nolan
Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 7:09 AM
To: Greg Freeman ; Debra Stark ; Leroy
Gessmann ; Berdette ATBA ; Ivy Kushner
Subject: Re: This is Greg Freeman from the Turf Paradise meeting last night



Thank You for your response. I am willing and available to meet with you at your convenience.

My concerns are for my neighborhood, where I have resided since the mid 1980's.

I wish to gather information concerning the past rezoning of the Turf Paradise property in order to
understand why the 28 acre parcel was not included in the previous rezoning as part of this acreage is in
the middle of the property.

In the past 23 years (the period when Jerry Simms has owned the property), I have witnessed the
deterioration of this property. Many attempts to request regulators to hold Jerry Simms accountable for it's
upkeep have fallen upon deaf ears. He was able to accomplish this through his manipulation of the
Racing Commission which is the focus of litigation, that currently exist.I will bring these attempts to your
attention when we meet.

In conclusion, it is my belief that this property needs to be restored to the condition in which it was when
he purchased the property, (approximately) 1999-2000. The damage that the presence of Jerry Simms
has brought to my community, our neighborhood, the Arizona Agricultural Entertainment Businesses of
Horse Racing and Breeding, and all of Arizona are extremely visible.He has been a terrible business
neighbor to all of Arizona.

Again, Thank You for your response, and I await your reply.




On Thursday, June 29, 2023 at 12:20:15 PM MST, Greg Freeman wrote:




Stephen,

This is Greg Freeman, we met at the Turf Paradise meeting last night.
I apologize for not having a business card with me, but my contact information is attached. Let me know if
you have any questions or would like to set a time to meet.

Thank you!

Greg Freeman
PROPERTY MANAGER
gfreeman@mpbrealty.net | mpbrealty.net [mpbrealty.net]
[mpbrealty.net]O 602.280.1010 EXT 108     F 602.234.3880
1450 EAST INDIAN SCHOOL RD, SUITE 104 [MPBREALTY.NET]
PHOENIX, AZ 85014 [MPBREALTY.NET]




Page 614
Page 615
Page 616
March 6, 2024

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL

Phoenix Planning Commission
Phoenix Planning & Development Department
200 West Washington Street, 2nd Floor
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
racelle.escolar@phoenix.gov

Re: Z-31-23

Dear Chairman Gaynor and Planning Commission Members::

This firm represents Bruin Corporation regarding its property at 1656 West Tierra Buena Lane, Phoenix, which is the
largest parcel south and east of the property addressed in rezoning case Z-31-23. The case is coming to the Planning
Commission on March 7, 2024 without benefit of a Deer Valley Village Planning Committee recommendation.

We have watched with interest as the case has progressed and communicated with the applicant’s counsel regarding
Bruin’s concerns with the project. We are pleased to say we worked with the applicant’s counsel and agreed to the
enclosed proposed stipulations for the case. We understand the applicant is also in agreement.

Bruin seeks definitive mitigation of potential impacts from the overall commerce park project contemplated on the
rezoning site and the bulk of the Turf Paradise property. Without a development plan for Turf Paradise that is more
than highly conceptual, Bruin believes the added protections included in the attached proposal are necessary for the
rezoning parcel, which is contiguous to Bruin’s property.

Thank you for your consideration.

Very truly yours,

WITHEY MORRIS BAUGH P.L.C.


By
Jason Barclay Morris
Enclosure

cc: pdd.planningcomm@phoenix.gov
Paul Gilbert (pgilbert@gilbertblilie.com)




Page 617
March 6, 2024



PHOENIX REZONING APPLICATION Z-31-23 – PROPOSED STIPULATIONS

1. General conformance to the site plan date stamped _____________, 2024 as it applies to the 28 acre parcel
that is the subject of Z-31-23.

2. A minimum 20-foot landscaped setback shall be provided along perimeter lot lines not adjacent to a street.
This standard shall not apply if the adjacent property is zoned C-1, C-2, C-3, A-1, A-2, Commerce Park.

3. The 20-foot landscaped setback along perimeter lot lines, when required, shall include:

a. Min. 2-inch caliper trees (50%) and min. 3-inch caliper trees (50%) planted 20-feet on center or in
equivalent groupings, as approved by the Planning & Development Department.

b. Min. five (5) 5-gallon shrubs per tree.

4. Outdoor storage shall be setback a minimum of 100 feet from a residential zoning district.

5. Parking lot area(s) shall be landscaped per the standards of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance §624.E.4.e, the C-
3/General Commercial Zoning District.

6. The average noise level, measured at the property line, shall not exceed 55 dB (ldn) when measured on an
“A weighted” sound level meter and according to the procedures of the Environmental Protection Agency.

7. Noise-generating equipment, e.g. but not limited to air chillers and generators, shall be located a minimum
of 300 feet from a residential district or shall be shielded by a building or sound mitigation wall to achieve the
required noise level.

8. Parking lot and security lighting shall not exceed a maximum height of 15 feet including lamp, pole, and base
within 200 feet of a residential district. (Slightly revised from S507 Tab A.II.A.8.3.)

9. All on-site lighting shall be shielded to prevent direct visibility of the light source from adjacent property.

10. Lighting shall be shielded with cut-off fixtures and deflectors to direct light downward and limit on-site lighting
levels to a maximum of one (1) foot candle at the property line.

11. Signage shall be subject to approval of a comprehensive sign plan per Phoenix Zoning Ordinance §705.F.2.




Page 618
20' Setback Line -
Required Minimum
Landscape Setback along 144' Setback Line -
Perimeter Required Minimum
(30' along Tierra Buena) Setback for 56' Tall
Building.
Page 619




Boundary of
Rezoning Case
March 7, 2024



PHOENIX REZONING APPLICATION Z-31-23 – PROPOSED STIPULATIONS

1. General conformance to the site plan date stamped _____________, 2024 as it applies to the 28 acre parcel
that is the subject of Z-31-23.

2. A minimum 20-foot landscaped setback shall be provided along perimeter lot lines not adjacent to a street.
This standard shall not apply if the adjacent property is zoned C-1, C-2, C-3, A-1, A-2, Commerce Park.
Required landscape setbacks shall planted with minimum 2-inch caliper (50%) and min. 3-inch caliper trees
(50%) large canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20-feet on center or in equivalent groupings, with five 5-gallon
shrubs per tree, as approved by the Planning & Development Department.

3. Outdoor storage areas shall be setback a minimum of 100 feet from a residential zoning district.

4. Parking lot area(s) shall be landscaped per the standards of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance §624.E.4.e, the C-
3/General Commercial Zoning District.

5. Noise-generating equipment, e.g. but not limited to air chillers and generators, shall be located a minimum
of 300 feet from a residential district or shall be shielded by a building or sound mitigation wall to achieve the
required noise level.

6. Parking lot and security lighting shall not exceed a maximum height of 15 feet including lamp, pole, and base
within 200 feet of a residential district.

7. All on-site lighting shall be shielded to prevent direct visibility of the light source from adjacent property.

8. Lighting shall be shielded with cut-off fixtures and deflectors to direct light downward and limit on-site lighting
levels to a maximum of one (1) foot candle at the property line.

9. Signage shall be subject to approval of a comprehensive sign plan per Phoenix Zoning Ordinance §705.E.2.




Page 620



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
***REQUEST TO ADD-ON (SEE ATTACHED MEMO)*** Acceptance and Dedication
of a Deed and Easement for Roadway and Public Utility Purposes (Ordinance S-
50738)

Request for the City Council to accept and dedicate a deed and easement for roadway
and public utility purposes; further ordering the ordinance recorded.

Summary
Accepting the property interests below meets the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.

Easement (a)
Applicant: Mangl Murti, LLC; its successor and/or assigns
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 9202 N. 35th Ave.
File: 240001
Council District: 1

Easement (b)
Applicant: TNS Investments Company; its successor and/or assigns
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: 1639 E. Deer Valley Rd.
File: 240011
Council District: 2

Deed (c)
Applicant: Esperanza Y. Alvarado Felix; its successor and/or assigns
Purpose: Roadway
Location: 337 W. Watkins St.
File: 230101
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development and Finance departments.


Page 621
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT



To: Alan Stephenson Date: March 29, 2024
Deputy City Manager

From: Joshua Bednare�
Planning and Dev�pment Director

Subject: ITEM 81 - REQUEST FOR ADD-ON TO THE APRIL 3, 2024, CITY
COUNCIL FORMAL AGENDA TO ADD ACCEPTANCE AND DEDICATION
OF A DEED AND EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY AND PUBLIC UTILITY
PURPOSES (ORDINANCE S-50738)

This memo requests an add-on to the April 3, 2024, Formal Agenda under Planning and
Zoning Matters for City Council to approve the Acceptance and Dedication of a Deed and
Easement for Roadway and Public Utility Purposes.




Approved:
Date




Page 622

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

74 item(s)