For Approval or Correction, the Minutes of the Formal Meeting on January 22,

Summary
This item transmits the minutes of the Formal Meeting of January 22, 2025, for review,
correction and/or approval by the City Council.

The minutes are available for review in the City Clerk Department, 200 W. Washington
Street, 15th Floor.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

For Approval or Correction, the Minutes of the Formal Meeting on February 5,

Summary
This item transmits the minutes of the Formal Meeting of February 5, 2025, for review,
correction and/or approval by the City Council.

The minutes are available for review in the City Clerk Department, 200 W. Washington
Street, 15th Floor.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

to Boards and Commissions

Summary
This item transmits recommendations from the Mayor and Council for appointment or
reappointment to City Boards and Commissions.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Mayor's Office.





ATTACHMENT A




To: City Council Date: May 7, 2025
From: Mayor Kate Gallego

Subject: *REVISED BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS – APPOINTEES

The purpose of this memo is to provide recommendations for appointments to the
following Boards and Commissions:

Ahwatukee Foothills Village Planning Committee

Councilman Robinson recommends the following for appointment:

Nadav Golden
Mr. Golden is a student and a resident of District 6. He fills a vacancy for a term to
expire May 7, 2027.

Alhambra Village Planning Committee

Councilwoman Guardado recommends the following for appointment:

Gabriel Gamiño Guerrero
Mr. Gamiño Guerrero is the Director of Community Relations at Alhambra Elementary
School District and a resident of District 5. He fills a vacancy for a term to expire May 7,
2027.

Carlos Velasco
Mr. Velasco is the founder and CEO of Novle and a resident of District 5. He fills a
vacancy for a term to expire May 7, 2027.

Deer Valley Village Planning Committee

Vice Mayor O’Brien recommends the following for appointment:

Gerrald Adams
Mr. Adams is a director with Perlman Architects of Arizona and a resident of District 1.
He fills a vacancy for a term to expire May 7, 2027.




Development Advisory Board

I recommend the following for appointment:

Matthew Miles
Mr. Miles is the Deputy Planning and Development Director at the City of Phoenix. He
replaces John-Jozef (JJ) Proczka as the Ex-Officio Building Official.

Human Services Commission

I recommend the following for appointment:

Rhoshawndra Carnes
Ms. Carnes is a Community Development Consultant at Arizona Public Service and a
resident of District 7. She fills a vacancy as a Category III representative for a term to
expire June 30, 2027.

Alyse Hammonds
Ms. Hammonds is a Legal Administrative Specialist at the U.S. Department of Veteran
Affairs and a resident of District 7. She fills a vacancy as a Category II, Area A
representative for a term to expire June 30, 2027.

I recommend the following for reappointment:

Laura Bulluck
Ms. Bulluck will serve her second term as a Category III representative for a term to
expire June 30, 2027.

Sheriloyn Curry
Reverend Curry will serve her second term as a Category II, Area C representative for a
term to expire June 30, 2026.

Itoro Elijah
Ms. Elijah will serve her second term as a Category III representative for a term to
expire June 30, 2026.

Audrey Jenkins
Ms. Jenkins will serve her third term as a Category III representative for a term to expire
June 30, 2026.

Tamala McBath
Ms. McBath will serve her second term as a Category III representative for a term to
expire June 30, 2027.




Maryvale Village Planning Committee

Councilwoman Guardado recommends the following for appointment:

Jeff Ewing
Mr. Ewing is a resident of District 5. He fills a vacancy for a term to expire May 7, 2027.

*Victoria Stahl
Ms. Stahl is a Communications Organizer at Unite Here Local 11 and a resident of
District 5. She fills a vacancy for a term to expire May 7, 2027.

Military Veterans Commission

I recommend the following for appointment:

Antonio Rosacci
Mr. Rosacci is an attorney at the Rosacci Law Firm, PC. He fills a vacancy for a term to
expire May 7, 2028.

Mario Valencia
Mr. Valencia is the owner of Robek’s Juice and a resident of District 7. He fills a vacancy
for a term to expire May 7, 2028.

North Gateway Village Planning Committee

Vice Mayor O’Brien recommends the following for appointment:

Will Manion
Mr. Manion is a New Home Consultant with Lennar Homes and a resident of District 2.
He fills a vacancy for a term to expire May 7, 2027.







Report

Liquor License - Ra Sushi Towne Square - District 2

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 314861.

Summary

Applicant
Nathan Keane, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
13802 N. Scottsdale Road, Ste. 176
Zoning Classification: PUD
Council District: 2

This request is for an acquisition of control of an existing liquor license for a restaurant.
This location is currently licensed for liquor sales.

The 60-day limit for processing this application was May 5, 2025. However, the
applicant submitted a written request for more time.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration may be given only to the applicant's personal
qualifications.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,



grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have worked for RA Sushi for 14.5 Years and have been in a role of Senior
Leadership for the brand for 8 years. I am currently the Agent for the liquor license."

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Urban Fraiche - District 4

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 334695.

Summary

Applicant
Diaeldin Waziry, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
111 E. Camelback Road
Zoning Classification: C-2 TOD-1
Council District: 4

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This location requires a
Use Permit to allow outdoor alcohol consumption.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 18, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications, and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.






Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
"I am extremely aware of the Liquor Laws, regulations & requirements for the state of
Arizona. I am very responsible for the safety of the public. I have also operated dozens
of hotels as well as managing restaurants and food & beverage facilities.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We are dedicated to providing best services and inspiring people to wellness and
safety.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Urban Fraiche - Data
Attachment B - Urban Fraiche - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: URBAN FRAICHE
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 1 1

Bar 6 14 2

Beer and Wine Bar 7 14 12

Liquor Store 9 6 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 7 1

Restaurant 12 52 27


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 168.36 173.77

Violent Crimes 12.31 27.99 24.41
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 40

Total Violations 69 88




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1075001 942 355 22 43

1075003 1528 403 81 98

1076013 997 362 76 88

1086023 1442 92 113 335

1088021 949 208 91 139

1088022 361 81 17 7

1088023 893 68 77 10

1171001 1768 158 74 235

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: URBAN FRAICHE
111 E CAMELBACK RD




Date: 4/10/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Tacos and Wings & Cerveza - District 5

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 334757.

Summary

Applicant
Julia Rubio, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
3544 W. Glendale Avenue, Ste. 1
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 5

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 9, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications, and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations



on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Filibertos Mexican Food (Series 12)
15602 N. 35th Avenue
Calls for police service: 5
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I operate DD Restaurant at 15602 N. 35th Ave Phx AZ 85053, never had any issues,
and I understand the rules and regulations.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We are purchasing a restaurant with an existing license the customers are used to
purchasing beers with their food and we want to maintaing that.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Tacos and Wings & Cerveza - Data
Attachment B - Tacos and Wings & Cerveza - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: TACOS AND WINGS & CERVEZA
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 2 0

Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 1

Liquor Store 9 3 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 6 5

Restaurant 12 4 2


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 185.93 221.12

Violent Crimes 12.31 29.32 51.69

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 40 205

Total Violations 68 348




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1058001 1812 275 20 441

1058002 1842 560 17 34

1058003 1394 359 7 31

1059002 1589 333 37 430

1069004 2284 363 21 575

1070012 2617 276 48 812

1070021 2203 496 22 1114

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: TACOS AND WINGS & CERVEZA
3544 W GLENDALE AVE




Date: 4/21/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Ra Sushi Bar Restaurant - District 6

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 314693.

Summary

Applicant
Nathan Keane, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
4921 E. Ray Road, Ste. B-1
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 6

This request is for an acquisition of control of an existing liquor license for a restaurant.
This location is currently licensed for liquor sales.

The 60-day limit for processing this application was May 3, 2025. However, the
applicant submitted a written request for more time.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,



grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I ahve worked for Ra Sushi for 14.5 years and have been in a role of senior
leadership for the brand for 8 years. I am currently the agent for the liquor license.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Marathon Food Mart - District 6

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 334448.

Summary

Applicant
Jared Repinski, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
4305 E. Ray Road
Zoning Classification: C-1 PCD
Council District: 6

This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that sells gas. This
location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an
interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 16, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications, and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.






Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have been assisting Arizona liquor licensed establishments with their licensing needs
for almost 20 years.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Tourism plays an important role in our local economy and liquor licensed
establishments (the sale of alcohol) is a very important aspect of tourism. Therefore, if
the City of Phoenix continues to lead the State of Arizona by approving quality and
diverse businesses (restaurants, bars, microbreweries, distilleries, hotels, resorts, golf
courses, special events, convenience/liquor/grocery stores & gas stations) similar to
this proposed liquor licensed business, all businesses will prosper.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Marathon Food Mart - Data
Attachment B - Marathon Food Mart - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: MARATHON FOOD MART
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 2 0
Beer and Wine Bar 7 5 0
Liquor Store 9 4 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 3 1
Restaurant 12 19 2


Crime Data

I Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***


I Property Crimes 64.2 83.35 53.71

Violent Crimes 12.31 9.15 7.21
I
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within½ mile radius


Property Violation Data

I Description
II Average
II 1/2 Mile Average
I
I Parcels wNiolations
I 40
II 7
I
I Total Violations
I 68
II 8
I




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1167103 1701 544 23 619

1167112 1286 128 34 206
1167181 1460 206 40 150
1167193 2092 331 14 70

1167194 1373 576 7 92
1167201 1513 469 34 111
1167202 1180 172 41 380

1167203 1429 320 66 89
Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: MARATHON FOOD MART
4305 E RAY RD



E chrna r
it)
..
'O
C



w




.:
0..
z

V.
I.,,

'1-CI-'
r.11
y o,


..
VI
a'I
a
,n




-
tn
..c
Cr.
(I)




C �
Ill


en

\..
L
en

-
II)




+
Date: 4/21/2025
N 0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
■M■:: : 3M.:::::ll---===3■---mi
City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Urban Fraiche Lifestyle - District 6

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 334431.

Summary

Applicant
Diaeldin Waziry, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
1016 E. Camelback Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 6

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This location
requires a Use Permit to allow outdoor dining and outdoor alcohol consumption.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 18, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications, and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.






Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am extremely aware of the liquor laws, regulations and requirements for the State of
Arizona. I am very responsible for the safety of the public. I also have operated dozens
of hotels as well as managing restaurants and food & beverage facilities.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We are dedicated to providing best services and inspiring people to wellness and
safety.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Urban Fraiche Lifestyle - Data
Attachment B - Urban Fraiche Lifestyle - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: URBAN FRAICHE LIFESTYLE
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 1 1

Wholesaler 4 2 0

Bar 6 6 2

Beer and Wine Bar 7 14 1

Liquor Store 9 7 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 11 3

Restaurant 12 53 9


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 171.6 165.18

Violent Crimes 12.31 23.77 22.08
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 56

Total Violations 69 107




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1075001 942 355 22 43

1076011 925 208 31 52

1076013 997 362 76 88

1076022 1529 218 57 118

1086021 2044 274 123 80

1086022 1825 155 88 126

1086023 1442 92 113 335

1086024 1033 260 68 191

1088022 361 81 17 7

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: URBAN FRAICHE LIFESTYLE
1016 E CAMELBACK RD




Date: 4/10/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Nini's Sports Bar - District 7

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 336131.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
1325 Grand Avenue, Ste. 4
Zoning Classification: C-2 M-R DNS/WVR ACOD
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 12, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications, and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.




Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
The applicant submitted an extensive statement. A copy is available upon request to
the City Clerk's Office at 200 West Washington Street, 1st Floor, Phoenix, AZ 85003.

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We would like the ability to serve our 21 and over patrons an adult beverage with their
meal if they choose to have one.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Nini's Sports Bar - Data
Attachment B - Nini's Sports Bar - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: NINI'S SPORTS BAR
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 3 1

Wholesaler 4 1 1

Government 5 3 0

Bar 6 16 3

Beer and Wine Bar 7 4 1

Liquor Store 9 2 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 13 4

Restaurant 12 36 7

Club 14 1 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 177.52 159.02

Violent Crimes 12.31 58.22 46.28

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 152

Total Violations 69 221




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1129001 1399 521 53 62

1129002 671 102 83 94

1129003 1168 99 40 80

1129004 1279 82 91 706

1130001 2898 331 199 515

1131001 1929 146 155 743

1143011 911 80 49 374

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: NINI'S SPORTS BAR
1325 GRAND AVE




Date: 4/4/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Pemberton - District 7

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 337958.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
1121 N. 2nd Street
Zoning Classification: DTC - Evans Churchill West
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 13, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications, and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.




Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We are committed to serving our patrons responsibly. We will ensure all of our
employees handling alcohol will be Title 4 trained.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
"Pemberton is an outdoor creative & cultural hub for locals, tourists & everyone in
between. A one-of-kind space, blending immersive art, food, drinks, and events. It's a
place where visitors can experience dynamic art installations, unique performances,
and interact with the local art scene. A vibrant, immersive environment with artistic and
cultural experiences. At it's core, Pemberton is an indoor/outdoor community gathering
space for people of all walks of life to come together and enjoy local art, local food and
local vibes.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Pemberton - Data
Attachment B - Pemberton - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: PEMBERTON
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 5 3

Government 5 7 3

Bar 6 43 14

Beer and Wine Bar 7 15 7

Liquor Store 9 6 4

Beer and Wine Store 10 13 5

Hotel 11 5 0

Restaurant 12 114 48

Club 14 2 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 257.85 413.9

Violent Crimes 12.31 55.62 78.55

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 40 63

Total Violations 68 100




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1117003 951 300 94 62

1118002 846 361 100 89

1118004 1423 507 117 200

1130001 2898 331 199 515

1130002 1364 179 221 139

1131001 1929 146 155 743

1131002 2026 50 492 845

1131003 2654 2 355 297

1132021 740 87 52 190

1132022 1347 118 99 594

1132041 1507 221 53 310

1132042 506 63 11 131

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: PEMBERTON
1121 N 2ND ST




Date: 4/15/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Tom's Watch Bar - District 7

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 332452.

Summary

Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
3 S. 2nd Street, Ste. 117
Zoning Classification: DTC - Business Core
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application was April 26, 2025. However, the
applicant submitted a written request for more time.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications, and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.






Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I understand the health and safety rules for serving food and drinks, and I will make
sure my business follows all the required regulations. I know how important it is to
keep the place clean and safe for both customers and staff. Above all, I will ensure that
regulations are followed and the operation is run safely.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Will run a safe and responsible place, making sure it is positive space for everyone
while following all the rules. and the Business will provide services that will help local
people and visitors, building a strong sense of community. and make sure the business
follows all health, and legal rules, keeping the space for customers and the
neighborhood.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Tom's Watch Bar - Data
Attachment B - Tom's Watch Bar - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: TOM'S WATCH BAR
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Producer 1 1 1

Microbrewery 3 4 0

Wholesaler 4 1 1

Government 5 7 4

Bar 6 48 27

Beer and Wine Bar 7 9 5

Liquor Store 9 5 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 13 1

Hotel 11 7 7

Restaurant 12 105 48

Club 14 3 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 234.76 287.15

Violent Crimes 12.31 60.5 60.61

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 40 10

Total Violations 68 17




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1131001 1929 146 155 743

1131002 2026 50 492 845

1131003 2654 2 355 297

1132022 1347 118 99 594

1140002 0 0 18 0

1140003 1025 304 49 114

1140004 394 12 24 88

1141001 2605 227 111 276

1142001 938 210 81 167

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: TOM'S WATCH BAR
3 S 2ND ST




Date: 4/21/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

City of Goodyear - Annual Water Utility Payment

For $355, 225 in payment authority to the City of Goodyear, for Phoenix Goodyear
Airport's (GYR) annual water utility charges, as provided in the GYR's annual
operating budget for the Aviation Department. GYR is located within Goodyear city
limits and is required to pay for the monthly water utilities received from the City of
Goodyear. The airport will be billed by the City of Goodyear for all water and sewer
charges, including the tenants' portion. GYR will charge its tenants monthly for each
tenant's responsible portion of the utility payments.








Report

CopperPoint Mutual Insurance Company

For $185,400 in payment authority for the continuous payment management of
Workers’ Compensation claims that remain open for the Human Resources
Department. The City of Phoenix has operated as a self-insured entity for Workers'
Compensation injuries since 2003. Prior to 2003, the City maintained Workers'
Compensation insurance coverage and remains responsible for the claims that were
incurred prior to 2003.








Report

Ergon Asphalt & Emulsions, Inc.

For $157,000 in payment authority for a new contract, entered on or about May 7,
2025, for a term of one year for emulsified asphalt for the Street Transportation
Department. The Street Maintenance Division utilizes asphalt emulsion products such
as CQS and PMRE to maintain and rejuvenate existing pavement to minimize
oxidation and cracking. Slurry seal and micro-surfacing treatment applications serve to
seal narrow cracks, slightly restore lost flexibility, provide a deep rich black pavement
surface color, and help preserve the underlying pavement structure, Citywide.








Report

State of Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

For $350,000 in payment authority for payment of Fiscal Year 2025-26 permit and
permit renewal fees for the Water Services Department. This expense covers annual
operating permits, hazardous waste permits, and quarterly disposal fees for the Water
Services Department's wastewater and water facilities, including the cost for the
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality to accept and review required
compliance reports, to inspect facilities for compliance with regulations, and for
document review fees associated with submitting the paperwork necessary to make
any additions or changes to the permits. As of 2011, the Arizona State Legislature
authorized the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality to collect fees for the
administration of permits associated with the Federal Clean Water Act and the State
Aquifer Protection Program.








Report

Maricopa County Environmental Services Department

For $60,000 in payment authority for Fiscal Year 2025-26 permit fees for the Water
Services Department. This expense covers the Phoenix Municipal Water System
annual operating permit and 17 septage waste hauler permits.








Report

United Rentals (North America), Inc

For $32,000 in payment authority for a new contract, entered on or about May 1, 2025,
for a term of seven years for trench safety equipment rental services for the Water
Services Department (WSD). WSD technicians perform maintenance and repairs on
water and wastewater infrastructure located throughout the City of Phoenix and such
repair is typically performed in trenches. Safety regulations require that all trenches
have safety equipment installed to prevent worksite hazards.








Report

Pickering Laboratories Inc.

For $95,000 in payment authority to purchase two Onyx PCX 5200 Post-Column
Derivatization (PCX) instruments, installation, and training for the Water Services
Department. The current PCX instruments are part of the critical infrastructure of the
lab used in the Water Services Compliance Laboratory for the analysis of glyphosate
and carbamates using the approved Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Methods.
They are the only instruments that are compatible with the Agilent High Performance
Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) instruments, which are used to ensure compliance
with the Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water Act.








Report

Settlement of Claim(s) Henricksen v. City of Phoenix

To make payment of up to $400,000 in settlement of claim(s) in Henricksen v. City of
Phoenix, CV2024-001134, 23-0102-002, GL, BI, for the Finance Department pursuant
to Phoenix City Code Chapter 42. This is a settlement of a claim involving the Fire
Department that occurred on January 30, 2023.








Report

Call for a Special Meeting and Notice of Legally Required Public Hearings on the
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget for the City of Phoenix - Citywide

Request for the City Council to call for a special meeting of the City Council, as
required by Arizona Revised Statute 42-17105, at 2:30 p.m., June 18, 2025, for the
purpose of considering adoption of the final Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 budget for the

Request to authorize the City Manager to:
· Set 2:30 p.m., June 4, 2025, as the time and date of the legally required public
hearing on the adoption of the tentative budget ordinances for the City of Phoenix
for FY 2025-26, including Operating Funds, Capital Funds and Reappropriated
Funds.
· Set 2:30 p.m., June 4, 2025, as the time and date of the public hearing for purposes
of receiving public comments on the proposed 2025-30 Capital Improvement
Program.
· Set 2:30 p.m., June 18, 2025, as the time and date of the legally required public
hearing on the adoption of a Property Tax Levy and Truth in Taxation, if applicable,
and the final adoption of the budget for the City of Phoenix for FY 2025-26,
including Operating Funds, Capital Funds, and Reappropriated Funds.
· Set 10:00 a.m., July 2, 2025, as the time and date of the legally required public
hearing on the adoption of the Property Tax Levy for FY 2025-26.

Summary
In addition to these legally required public hearings, from April 1 through April 16,
2025, 12 community budget hearings were advertised in various City newspapers and
online, and were held for each Council District in locations throughout the City and in
residents with several opportunities to comment on the proposed FY 2025-26 budget
and were video recorded for viewing on the City’s YouTube page and on PHXTV.
Residents also had the opportunity to provide feedback via phone and email. All
comments were summarized and provided to the City Council.





Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Budget and Research
Department.








Report

Grant of Easement to Southwest Gas on City-Owned Property Located at 205 S.
15th Street (Ordinance S-51872) - District 8

Request City Council to grant an easement, for the consideration of $1 and/or other
valuable consideration, for a natural gas pipeline to a City facility on City-owned
property in the Southwest Gas Corporation (SWG) service area, and further ordering
the ordinance recorded.

Summary
The easement is needed for the construction of a natural gas pipeline for City of
Phoenix pool improvements at Eastlake Park located at 205 S. 15th Street.

This public easement is more fully described in the legal description ("Easement
Premises") recorded with the ordinance and will be granted to all public service
corporations, and telecommunication corporations providing utility service to the
property located at 205 S. 15th Street (collectively "Grantee"), subject to the following
terms and conditions:

A. Grantee is hereby granted the right to construct, reconstruct, replace, repair,
operate and maintain utility facilities together with appurtenant fixtures for use in
connection therewith for the transmission and distribution of utility and communication
facilities (collectively "Grantee Facilities") to, through, across and beyond Grantor's
property within the Easement Premises. Subject to the notice requirements provided in
paragraph "I," Grantee shall at all times have the right of full and free ingress and
egress to and along the Easement Premises for the purposes herein specified.
Grantee acknowledges and accepts that Grantee shall share the Easement Premises
with other Grantees in accordance with and consistent with industry standards and
customs for such shared use; provided that such shared use shall not hinder or
endanger Grantee's Facilities, access or right under this Public Utility Easement and
that all Grantee specifications for separation from its facilities are maintained. Grantor
agrees to coordinate the location of Grantee's Facilities within the Easement Premises
and to pay costs for relocation of Grantee's Facilities as provided in paragraph "F."

B. Grantor shall not locate, erect or construct, or permit to be located or erected or
constructed, any building or structure within the limits of the Easement Premises.



However, Grantor reserves all other rights, interests, and uses of the Easement
Premises that are not inconsistent with Grantee's easement rights herein conveyed
and which do not interfere with or endanger any of the Grantee Facilities.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Grantor shall not have the right to lower by more than
one foot or raise by more than two feet the surface grade of Easement Premises
without the prior written consent by the Grantee whose facilities will be affected by the
change of elevation.

C. Grantee shall not have the right to use the Easement Premises to store gasoline or
petroleum products, hazardous or toxic substances, or flammable materials; provided
however, that this prohibition shall not apply to any material, equipment or substance
contained in, or a part of, the Grantee Facilities, provided that Grantee must comply
with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations in connection therewith.
Additionally, the Easement Premises may not be used for the storage of construction-
related materials or to park or store construction-related vehicles or equipment except
on a temporary basis to construct, reconstruct, replace, repair, operate, or maintain the
Grantee Facilities.

D. Grantor shall maintain an appropriate three-foot clear area around all edges of all
equipment pads for Grantee Facilities in addition to a clear operational area that
extends 10 feet immediately in front of all transformer or switching cabinet openings,
within the Easement Premises. No obstruction, trees, shrubs, fixtures, or permanent
structures shall be placed or permitted by Grantor within said areas. Grantee is hereby
granted the right to trim, prune, cut, and clear away trees, brush, shrubs, or other
obstruction within said areas.

E. Grantee shall exercise reasonable care to avoid damage to the Easement
Premises and all improvements thereon and agrees that following any work or use by
Grantee within the Easement Premises, the affected area, including without limitation,
all pavement, landscaping, concrete and other improvements permitted within the
Easement Premises pursuant to this easement will be restored by Grantee to as close
to original condition as is reasonably possible, at the expense of Grantee.

F. Grantor reserves the right to require the relocation of Grantee Facilities to a new
location within Grantor's property; provided however, that: (1) Grantor pays the entire
cost of redesigning and relocating existing Grantee Facilities to the new location; and
(2) Grantor provides Grantee with a new and substantially similar public utility
easement at no cost to Grantee. After relocation of Grantee Facilities to the new
easement area, Grantee shall abandon its rights to use the Easement Premises
granted in this easement without cost or consequence to Grantor.



G. Each public service corporation and telecommunication services corporation as a
Grantee shall coordinate and work with other Grantees in the use of the Easement
Premises. In the event that a third party or other Grantee requests the relocation of
existing Grantee Facilities to a new location (whether or not) within the Easement
Premises, the requesting party shall pay the entire cost of redesigning and relocating
the existing Grantee Facilities.

H. Grantee shall not have the right to transfer, convey or assign its interests in this
easement to any individual, corporation, or other entity without the prior written
consent of Grantor, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Grantee shall
notify Grantor of any proposed transfer, conveyance or assignment of any rights
granted herein at address listed below.

I. Except in emergencies or exigent circumstances such as service restoration,
Grantee agrees to contact Grantor at least one business day prior to Grantee's
entrance onto the Easement Premises where the Easement Premises are located: (1)
on a site that includes Aviation Department facilities; (2) water and wastewater
treatment facilities; (3) Police Department headquarters located at 620 W. Washington
Street; (4) Fire Department headquarters located at 150 S. 12th Street; (5) City Hall
located at 200 W. Washington Street; (6) City Court Building located at 300 W.
Washington Street; (7) Calvin C. Goode Building located at 251 W. Washington Street;
(8) Transit Operations Center located at 320 N. 1st Avenue or West Transit Facility
located at 405 N. 79th Avenue; or (9) in a secured or fenced area.

Location
205 S. 15th Street, identified by Maricopa County assessor parcel number 116-50-014.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Parks and
Recreation and Finance departments.








Report

Grant of a Public Utility Easement on City-Owned Property Located at 5902 W.
Indian School Road (Ordinance S-51875) - District 5

Request City Council to grant a public utility easement, for the consideration of $1
and/or other valuable consideration, for electrical facilities and the installation of a pad-
mounted transformer on City-owned property in the Salt River Project (SRP) service
area, and further ordering the ordinance recorded.

Summary
The public utility easement is required for construction of a new golf house at Maryvale
Golf Course pursuant to City Contract 139707. The electrical service will connect from
the existing transformer to a new transformer near the new building located at 5902 W.
Indian School Road.

This public utility easement is more fully described in the legal description ("Easement
Premises") recorded with the ordinance and will be granted to all public service
corporations, agricultural improvement districts, and telecommunication corporations
providing utility service (collectively "Grantee") to the property located at 5902 W.
Indian School Road, in perpetuity so long as Grantee uses the Easement Premises for
the purposes herein specified for an indefinite period, subject to the following terms
and conditions:

A. Grantee is hereby granted the right to construct, reconstruct, replace, repair,
operate and maintain utility facilities together with appurtenant fixtures for use in
connection therewith (collectively "Grantee Facilities") to, through, across and beyond
Grantor's property within the Easement Premises. Subject to the notice requirements
provided in paragraph "I," Grantee shall at all times have the right of full and free
ingress and egress to and along the Easement Premises for the purposes herein
specified. Grantee acknowledges and accepts that Grantee shall share the Easement
Premises with other Grantees and shall use such Easement Premises with other
Grantees in accordance with and consistent with industry standards and customs for
shared use. Grantor agrees to coordinate the location of Grantee's Facilities within the
Easement Premises and to pay costs for relocation of Grantee's Facilities as provided
in paragraph "F."




B. Grantor shall not locate, erect or construct, or permit to be located or erected or
constructed, any building or structure within the limits of the Easement Premises.
However, Grantor reserves all other rights, interests, and uses of the Easement
Premises that are not inconsistent with Grantee's easement rights herein conveyed
and which do not interfere with or endanger any of the Grantee Facilities.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Grantor shall not have the right to lower by more than
one foot or raise by more than two feet the surface grade of Easement Premises
without the prior written consent by the Grantee whose facilities will be affected by the
change of elevation.

C. Grantee shall not have the right to use the Easement Premises to store gasoline or
petroleum products, hazardous or toxic substances, or flammable materials; provided
however, that this prohibition shall not apply to any material, equipment or substance
contained in, or a part of, the Grantee Facilities, provided that Grantee must comply
with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations in connection therewith.
Additionally, the Easement Premises may not be used for the storage of construction-
related materials or to park or store construction-related vehicles or equipment except
on a temporary basis to construct, reconstruct, replace, repair, operate, or maintain the
Grantee Facilities.

D. Grantor shall maintain an appropriate three-foot clear area around all edges of all
equipment pads for Grantee Facilities in addition to a clear operational area that
extends 10 feet immediately in front of all transformer or switching cabinet openings,
within the Easement Premises. No obstruction, trees, shrubs, fixtures, or permanent
structures shall be placed or permitted by Grantor within said areas. Grantee is hereby
granted the right to trim, prune, cut, and clear away trees, brush, shrubs, or other
obstruction within said areas.

E. Grantee shall exercise reasonable care to avoid damage to the Easement
Premises and all improvements thereon and agrees that following any work or use by
Grantee within the Easement Premises, the affected area, including without limitation,
all pavement, landscaping, concrete and other improvements permitted within the
Easement Premises pursuant to this easement will be restored by Grantee to as close
to original condition as is reasonably possible, at the expense of Grantee.

F. Grantor reserves the right to require the relocation of Grantee Facilities to a new
location within Grantor's property; provided however, that: (1) Grantor pays the entire
cost of redesigning and relocating existing Grantee Facilities to the new location; and
(2) Grantor provides Grantee with a new and substantially similar public utility
easement at no cost to Grantee. After relocation of Grantee Facilities to the new
easement area, Grantee shall abandon its rights to use the Easement Premises


granted in this easement without cost or consequence to Grantor.

G. Each public service corporation and telecommunication services corporation as a
Grantee shall coordinate and work with other Grantees in the use of the Easement
Premises. In the event that a third party or other Grantee requests the relocation of
existing Grantee Facilities to a new location (whether or not) within the Easement
Premises, the requesting party shall pay the entire cost of redesigning and relocating
the existing Grantee Facilities.

H. Grantee shall not have the right to transfer, convey or assign its interests in this
easement to any individual, corporation, or other entity without the prior written
consent of Grantor, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Grantee shall
notify Grantor of any proposed transfer, conveyance or assignment of any rights
granted herein at address listed below.

I. Except in emergencies or exigent circumstances such as service restoration,
Grantee agrees to contact Grantor at least one business day prior to Grantee's
entrance onto the Easement Premises where the Easement Premises are located: (1)
on a site that includes Aviation Department facilities; (2) water and wastewater
treatment facilities; (3) Police Department headquarters located at 620 W. Washington
Street; (4) Fire Department headquarters located at 150 S. 12th Street; (5) City Hall
located at 200 W. Washington Street; (6) City Court Building located at 300 W.
Washington Street; (7) Calvin C. Goode Building located at 251 W. Washington Street;
(8) Transit Operations Center located at 320 N. 1st Avenue or West Transit Facility
located at 405 N. 79th Avenue; or (9) in a secured or fenced area.

Location
5902 W. Indian School Road, identified by Maricopa County assessor parcel number
144-43-001F.
Council District: 5

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Parks and
Recreation and Finance departments.








Report

Acceptance and Dedication of Easements for Public Utility Purposes (Ordinance
S-51877) - Districts 1 & 4

Request for the City Council to accept and dedicate easements for public utility
purposes; further ordering the ordinance recorded. Legal descriptions are recorded via
separate recording instrument.

Summary
Accepting the property interests below meets the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.

Easement (a)
MCR: 20250161104
Applicant and Grantor: Madison At Deer Valley, LLC; its successor and assigns
Date: March 25, 2025
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 2842 W. Louise Drive
APN: 206-04-026R
File: 250012
Council District: 1

Easement (b)
MCR: 20250157897
Applicant and Grantor: Manuel Maldonado Calderon; Petra Rubi Maldonado Gaytan;
its successor and assigns
Date: March 24, 2025
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 3502 W. Almeria Road
APN: 108-24-067A
File: 250015
Council District: 4






Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development and Finance departments.








Report

Benefits Consultant for Solicitation Services - RFP HR 22-007 - Amendment
(Ordinance S-51873) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 157693 with The Segal Company (Western States), Inc. to modify the scope
of work and add additional expenditures. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not
exceed $115,000.

Summary
The Contractor has been providing professional consulting services to the Human
Resources Department during the development of Request for Proposals. Deliverables
include scope of work development, review and analysis of offers, negotiations and
contract development. The scope of work is modified to include additional solicitation
services. The Contractor will assist the Human Resources Department with the
following additional solicitations: Medicare Billing Agreement, Employee Assistance
Program, and the Employee HealthCare Clinic.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending December 14, 2025 with two additional
one-year options to extend.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $115,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $435,000. Funds are available in the Human Resources
Department's budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Benefits Consultant for Solicitation Services - RFP HR 22-007 - Request for Award,
Contract 157693 (Ordinance S-49266) on December 14, 2022.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager David Mathews and the Human
Resources Department.




Report

Uninterruptible Power Supply Equipment, Service and Maintenance - IFB 25-
0535 - Request for Award (Ordinance S-51880) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contracts with
Gruber Technical, Inc. dba Gruber Power Services; Titan Power, Inc.; Enterprise
Networks Solutions, Inc.; Insight Public Sector, Inc.; and Power Quality Professionals,
LLC to purchase Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) units, parts, and maintenance
and repair services for citywide use. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contracts will not exceed
$3,500,000.

Summary
These contracts will provide UPS equipment and associated services and
maintenance, which are vital for citywide services that require constant, uninterrupted
power. The UPS units supply power in the event of an outage, which allow continued
operations until power resumes. Some critical operations include 911 call centers,
citywide data rooms, and water production and distribution functions.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid procurement was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Five vendors submitted bids deemed to be responsive to the posted specifications and
responsible to provide the required goods and services. Following an evaluation based
on price, the procurement officer recommends award to the following vendors:

Selected Bidders
Gruber Technical, Inc. dba Gruber Power Services
Titan Power, Inc.
Enterprise Networks Solutions, Inc.
Insight Public Sector, Inc.
Power Quality Professionals, LLC

Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about July 1, 2025, and will expire on June 30, 2030, for



a five-year term with no options to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value for these contracts will not exceed $3,500,000. Funding is
available in the various departments’ operating budgets.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.








Report

Plumbing Services, Including Rooter and Drain Cleaning - IFB-25-0506 -
Requirements Contract (Ordinance S-51886) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contracts with
Above All Plumbing Services, Inc. and Signature Mechanical, Inc. to provide plumbing
repairs, including rooter and drain cleaning for various city properties and facilities on
an as-needed basis for citywide use. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The aggregate value of the contracts will not
exceed $8,000,000.

Summary
This contract will provide all standard labor, materials, supplies, equipment, permits,
tools, vehicles, transportation, and security fees necessary for plumbing repairs and/or
services for various City of Phoenix properties or facilities on an as-needed basis. In
addition, the contractors shall supply all labor, equipment materials, permits, and
supplies necessary to provide rooter and drain cleaning services for fresh water and
wastewater drain lines, including waste and vent systems at City of Phoenix facilities
on an as-needed basis. The contractor's customer support shall be provided on a 24-
hours-a-day, seven-days-a-week basis.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid procurement was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10. The lowest bids were determined by evaluation unit
price and per hour basis. Above All Plumbing Services, Inc. and Signature Mechanical,
Inc. submitted bids deemed to be responsive to posted specifications and responsible
to provide the required goods and services. Following an evaluation based on price,
the procurement officer recommends award to the following vendors: Above All
Plumbing Services, Inc. and Signature Mechanical, Inc.

Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about May 7, 2025, for a five-year term.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contracts will not exceed $8,000,000. Funds are available
in the various departments' budgets.




Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.








Report

Authorization to Apply for, Accept, and Enter into an Agreement for Victims of
Crime Act Grant Funds (Ordinance S-51887) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to apply for, accept, and enter
into an agreement with the Arizona Department of Public Safety for a Victims of Crime
Act (VOCA) grant in an amount not to exceed $1,250,000. Further request
authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and for the City Controller to disburse, all
funds related to this item.

Summary
The VOCA grant is federally funded and administered by the Arizona Department of
Public Safety. The application provides an opportunity to request ongoing funding to
further enhance victim services in the City of Phoenix Prosecutor's Office. The VOCA
application process has opened for the grant period from October 1, 2025 to
September 30, 2026.

For more than 20 years, the City of Phoenix Prosecutor's Office has requested and
received approval from City Council to apply for VOCA grant funds to partially fund
staff in the Victim Services Unit. Advocates provide an array of legally mandated as
well as compassionate services to victims of misdemeanor crimes that occur within the
assisting victims seeking shelter from their abusers, connecting victims to necessary
resources inside and outside of the City, attending court hearings, arranging for
transportation to and from court, translating complex nuances of the process to victims
and providing legally mandated notification of court dates. The grant would provide
continued funding for five employees. VOCA funding allowed the City to greatly reduce
victim advocate case loads. Reducing the case load significantly increases Victim
Services' opportunity to provide more personalized services to all crime victims,
meeting the needs of the community.

Contract Term
The initial grant period is October 1, 2025 to September 30, 2026.

Financial Impact
Total grant funding will not exceed $1,250,000. City funding for existing Victim Services



positions provides the required 20 percent in-kind match.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Law Department.








Report

Authorization to Enter Into Contract with The Arizona Community Action
Association dba Wildfire (Ordinance S-51878) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with The Arizona Community Action Association, Inc. dba Wildfire to accept local utility
funds in an amount not to exceed $600,000 for the period from about July 1, 2025
through June 30, 2026. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept, and
the City Controller to disburse, all funds related to this item.

Summary
Funding provided to the City of Phoenix through this agreement will be used to assist
low-income individuals and families by removing barriers to self-sufficiency through
utility bill assistance. The funding will allow the Human Services Department to provide
emergency financial assistance to approximately 1,083 households.

Funding consists of both federal and local funds, including: Home Energy Assistance
Funds; Utility, Repair, Replace, Deposit; Arizona Public Service; Southwest Gas Low
Income Energy Assistance Program; Southwest Gas Energy SHARE Bill Assistance;
and Salt River Project Bill Assistance.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about July 1, 2025 and run through June 30, 2026.

Financial Impact
The total amount of the contract will not exceed $600,000. There is no impact to the
General Fund.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Human Services
Department.








Report

Authorization to Enter Into Contract for Property Management Services for the

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contract with
Plaza Del Rio Management Corporation dba Plaza Companies (Plaza) for the Human
Services Department’s (HSD) Family Advocacy Center (FAC) property management
services. The term of this contract will be for one-year beginning on or about July 1,
2025 through June 30, 2026, with four, one-year options to extend through June 30,
2030. The annual contract value will not exceed $251,508. Of the annual contract
value, up to $123,000 is allocated for property management services fees and up to
$128,508 will support operation and maintenance (O&M) expenses the City is
responsible for. The total value of the contract will not exceed $1,257,540, over the
contract life. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. Funding is available in HSD's General Funds, contingent upon
annual budget approval.

Summary
HSD requires third party property management services in connection with the
continued operations of the FAC located at 2120 N. Central Avenue (Property), a City-
owned HSD facility. Plaza will be responsible for property management of the Property,
collection of O&M expenses, and collection of non-City tenant rent. O&M expenses for
the facility include utilities, cleaning, current or future repairs and maintenance costs,
fire/safety, security, management fees, and property taxes. O&M expenses will also be
used to pay for any potential or unexpected construction projects.

Procurement Information
Request for Proposals, RFP-25-MSD-0497, was conducted in accordance with the
31, 2025, which were determined responsive and responsible to the solicitation
requirements.

The Evaluation Committee evaluated all proposals based on the evaluation criteria,
responsiveness to all the specifications, terms and conditions, and responsibility to
provide the required service. The Evaluation Criteria was as follows with a maximum
total of 1,000 possible points:



· Experience and Qualifications of Firm and Key Personnel - 400 possible points
· Method of Approach - 300 possible points
· Price Proposal - 150 possible points
· Project Management Capacity - 100 possible points
· Additional Financial Documentation - 50 possible points

The Evaluation Committee scored all proposals as follows:

Plaza Del Rio Management Corporation - 768 points
Capital Asset Management - 756 points
Lincoln Property Company - 738 points

Contract Term
The term of the contract will begin on or about July 1, 2025, and end June 30, 2026.
There will be four, one-year options to extend through June 30, 2030, which may be
exercised by the City Manager or designee.

Financial Impact
Expenditures will not exceed $1,257,540 over the contract life. Funds are available in
HSD's operating budget. Full funding is contingent upon annual budget approval.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Human Services
Department.








Report

Authorize Additional Funding for the Event Equipment Rental Services Contract
(Ordinance S-51874) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to add additional funding to
Event Equipment Rental Services Contract 155100, with Pride Group, LLC for the
Parks and Recreation Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The additional funding will not exceed $80,000.

Summary
This contract provides event equipment and rental services for large-scale City
sponsored events such as Fabulous Phoenix 4th. Equipment rentals may include
canopies, chairs, tables, lighting, generators, temporary barricades, and Americans
with Disabilities Act required platforms and ramps. Services may include the
transportation, set-up and tear down of equipment.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on June 30, 2026.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $242,500. Funding is available in the
Parks and Recreation Department operating budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:

• Event Equipment Rental Services Contract 155100 (Ordinance S-48734) on August
25, 2021.
• Authorize Additional Funding to the Event Equipment Rental Services Contract
(Ordinance S-51115) on June 26, 2024.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Parks and
Recreation Department.






Report

North Mountain Park Renovation - Engineering Services - PA75200612
(Ordinance S-51884) - District 3

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with J2 Engineering and Environmental Design, LLC to provide Engineering Services
that include design and possible construction administration and inspection services
for the North Mountain Park Renovation project. Further request to authorize execution
of amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved
expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The fee for services will not exceed $1.5 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services related to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable
television, railroads, and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the
documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This
authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to provide renovation and improvements to North
Mountain Park, including new parking lots, electrical lighting, restrooms, ramadas, play
area, pedestrian walkways, and native plant pallet landscapes.

J2 Engineering and Environmental Design, LLC's services include, but are not limited
to: design and possible construction administration and inspection for the renovations
and improvements at North Mountain Park.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
Section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
Section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received



or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Five firms submitted proposals
and are listed below.

Selected Firm
Rank 1: J2 Engineering and Environmental Design, LLC

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: Coe and Van Loo, LLC
Rank 3: Dig Studio, Inc.
Rank 4: Logan Simpson Design, Inc.
Rank 5: GLHN Architects and Engineers, Inc.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for J2 Engineering and Environmental Design, LLC will not
exceed $1.5 million, including all subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Parks and Recreation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and
approve funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.

Location
10608 N. 7th Street
Council District: 3

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
John Chan, the City Engineer and the Parks and Recreation Department.








Report

Amend Ordinance S-35137 Approving Fee Model for City Golf Course Green
Fees (Ordinance S-51891) - Districts 3, 4, 5, 6 & 8

Request City Council approval to amend Ordinance S-35137, which governs the
current fee structure for Phoenix golf courses to clarify the legislative intent of what
was approved by the City Council in 2008.

Summary
The current system-wide fee model for Phoenix golf courses, developed by the
National Golf Foundation (NGF), was established in 2008 following a recommendation
from the Parks and Recreation Board and approval by City Council to support the long-
term financial sustainability of Phoenix golf courses.

The Parks and Recreation Department is requesting an amendment to clarify
Ordinance S-35137, to better align with the intent of the City Council-approved NGF
fee model, which allows for an optional annual increase to the maximum benchmark
fee, tied to the cost of living, not to exceed five percent. The amendment specifies that
the annual increase to the maximum benchmark fees will be tied to the annual Cost of
Living Adjustment (COLA) published by the United States Social Security
Administration. To implement this clarification, the Parks and Recreation Department is
requesting City Council approval to amend Ordinance S-35137 as shown in
Attachment A.

This item is exempt from report and notice requirements by Arizona Revised Statute
Section 9-499.15(F)(3).

Concurrence/Prevous Council Action
· The Parks and Recreation Board unanimously approved this recommendation on
March 27, 2025.
· This item was recommended for approval by the Transportation, Infrastructure and
Planning Subcommittee at the April 16, 2025 meeting by a vote of 4-0.

Location
Cave Creek Golf Course; Encanto Golf Course and 9 hole; Grand Canyon University
Golf Course; Palo Verde Golf Course; Papago Golf Course; Aguila Golf Course and 9


hole
Council Districts: 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Parks and
Recreation Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT THE OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE S-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE S-35137,
GOVERNING FEES IN CITY GOLF COURSES, TO
PERMIT GOLF COURSE FEES TO BE ADJUSTED
SEASONALLY BASED ON A BENCHMARK MAXIMUM;


T
AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY TREASURER TO ACCEPT
RELATED FUNDS.
______________

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as

follows:


AF
SECTION 1. SECTION 1: Ordinance S-35137 is hereby amended by

striking Section 2 in its entirely and replacing it with the following:

The City Manager or his designee shall set a benchmark
maximum fee equal to the maximum fee designated in Section 1 plus an




DR
annual increase equal to the lesser of the Social Security Administration
Cost of Living Adjustment or 5%. The City Manager or his designee may
adjust golf course fees seasonally and on a per-course basis to rates that
do not exceed the benchmark maximum fee.

All other terms and conditions of Ordinance S-35137 will remain the same.

SECTION 2: The City Treasurer is authorized to accept all related funds

in furtherance of the purposes of this Ordinance.




PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 7th day of May, 2025.



________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:


________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:_______________________

________________________
T
REVIEWED BY:
AF
_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




D
DSC:phs:(LF25-0827):5-7-25:4935-1924-5884




R
2 Ordinance S-



Report

Modify the Junior Golf Card Program (Ordinance S-51890) - Districts 3, 4, 5, 6 & 8

Request City Council approval to modify the Junior Golf Card (JGC) program to extend
the validity period of the card from 30 days to 12 months and add a $5 daily green fee,
which includes 35 practice balls.

Summary
The JGC program is designed for golfers ages 17 and under, to make golf more
affordable while fostering long-term engagement with City courses. The current JGC is
$30 for unlimited play over 30 days. To expand access and increase youth
participation, the Parks and Recreation Department is proposing a modification to the
program, to extend the card's validity from 30 days to 12 months. The revised program
would maintain the one-time $30 JGC cost, but introduce a $5 daily green fee, which
includes 35 practice balls.

This item is exempt from report and notice requirements by Arizona Revised Statute
Section 9-499.15(F)(3).

Financial Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
· The Parks and Recreation Board unanimously approved this recommendation on
March 27, 2025.
· This item was recommended for approval by the Transportation, Infrastructure and
Planning Subcommittee at the April 16, 2025 meeting by a vote of 4-0.

Location
Cave Creek Golf Course; Encanto Golf Course and 9 hole; Grand Canyon University
Golf Course; Palo Verde Golf Course; Papago Golf Course; Aguila Golf Course and 9
hole.
Council Districts: 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8






Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Parks and
Recreation Department.








Report

Electronic Patient Care Reporting System - EXC 20-046 - Amendment (Ordinance
S-51888) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendment to
Contract 152640 with Starwest Associates, L.L.C., to extend the contract term for the
Electronic Patient Care Reporting (ePCR) System software, Zoi, for the Fire
Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $2,300,312.

Summary
This contract will provide the Fire Department's Emergency Medical Services (EMS)
personnel with continued use of a cloud-based system, Zoi, from Starwest Associates,
L.L.C. The Zoi system is used to electronically input, store, transmit, and analyze
medical incident and transportation data. The Zoi application benefits EMS personnel
by introducing efficiency and productivity improvements, eliminating the need for paper
records while ensuring the Department remains compliant with state and industry
standards. Additionally, the system allows the Department to analyze performance for
quality assurance and continuous quality improvement key performance indicators.
This extension will allow the Department time to assess technological requirements for
ePCR needs going forward.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Contract Term
Upon approval the contract will be extended through June 30, 2026, with two
additional one-year options to extend.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $2,300,312 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $5,350,312. Funds are available in the Fire Department’s
budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:



· Electronic Patient Care Reporting System Contract 152640, Ordinance S-46648, on
June 3, 2020.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.








Report

Biometrics Products and Services - COOP 23-069 - Amendment to Ordinance S-
51168 (Ordinance S-51866) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Ordinance S-51168 regarding a contract with Tech5 USA, Inc. to revise the term of the
contract to expire on October 31, 2025, with a one-year option to extend for the
purchase of Biometric Products and Services for the Phoenix Police Department. No
additional funds are needed, request to continue using Ordinance S-51168.

Summary
The purpose of this amendment is to revise the term of the contract originally awarded
on August 26, 2024, from a one-year term with a one-year option to extend, to a term
expiring on October 31, 2025 with a one-year option to extend, in order to extend and
align dates to match the master agreement adopted by the State of Arizona.

The contract will provide biometric products and services such as booking photos,
photo line-ups, and livescan fingerprinting for the Police Department Information
Technology Bureau. The biometrics system is vital to the booking operations as all
detained people are required to be photographed upon arrest. This system is critical
for identification of suspects and investigation of leads in criminal cases conducted by
the Phoenix Police Department.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Contract Term
The amended term of the contract will expire on October 31, 2025, with a one-year
option to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contract will not exceed $85,000 and no additional funds
are needed.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
· City Council approved Biometrics Products and Services Contract 161530,


Ordinance S-51168, on August 26, 2024.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.








Report

Interview Room Cameras - RFA 25-0613 - Request for Award (Ordinance S-51881)
- Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Axon Enterprise, Inc. to provide Interview Room Cameras for the Phoenix Police
Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $975,000.

Summary
This contract will provide a video/audio capturing system used to record critical
suspect, victim, and witness interviews during criminal investigations. It will also be
used to capture administrative and polygraph interviews. The system includes the
linking of the recorded evidence to cloud-based storage on Evidence.com.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reason:
Special Circumstances Without Competition/Sole Source. All camera footage, digital
documents, photographs, and other electronic evidence is stored on Evidence.com,
which is an Axon platform. The storage of all evidence on one platform ensures
efficiency in both storage and sharing capabilities.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about May 15, 2025, and continue through October 31,
2030, with no options to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $975,000 for the aggregate term.
Funding is available in the Phoenix Police Department's operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.





Report

Police Crime Lab Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning and Building
Automation Systems Controls - Construction Manager at Risk Construction
Services - PW26480024 (Ordinance S-51865) - District 7

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Kitchell Contractors, Inc. of Arizona (Kitchell) to provide Construction Manager at
Risk Construction Services for the Police Crime Lab Heating, Ventilation, and Air
Conditioning and Building Automation Systems Controls Project. Further request to
authorize execution of amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-
approved expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The fee for services will not exceed $8,216,000.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to repair or replace the current building automation
system and associated heating, ventilation, and air conditioning system in the Police
Department Crime Lab to ensure the building has proper control of airflows within the
laboratories, as well as in the fume hoods and biosafety cabinets used during
preparation and analysis of crime scene evidence.

Kitchell’s initial services will include preparing a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal
for the Construction Services provided under the agreement and participating with the
City in a process to establish a Small Business Enterprise (SBE) goal for the project.
Kitchell will be responsible for construction means and methods related to the project
and fulfilling the SBE program requirements. Kitchell will be required to solicit bids from
prequalified subcontractors and to perform the work using the City’s subcontractor
selection process. Kitchell may also compete to self-perform limited amounts of work.

Kitchell's services include, but are not limited to: removal of existing air valves and
building automation system controls, to be replaced with new air valves and controls;
removal of existing ACT system in two rooms; installation of new ceilings and light
fixtures; removal of existing fume hood, cap associated utilities, and patch wall; along
with other ancillary services as needed for the project.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in



Section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. Scoring and selection were made in
conjunction with the Construction Manager at Risk Preconstruction Services selection
process.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is 18 months from issuance of the Notice to Proceed. Work
scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term may
be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Kitchell Contractors, Inc. of Arizona will not exceed
$8,216,000, including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Public Works Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Construction Manager at Risk Preconstruction Services
Agreement 161019 (Ordinance S-51022) on June 12, 2024.

Location
621 W. Washington Street
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
Mario Paniagua, the City Engineer and the Public Works Department.








Report

Request to Apply for and Accept 100 Club of Arizona’s Safety Enhancement
Stipend Program (Ordinance S-51885) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to apply for, and accept, if
awarded, up to $70,000 from 100 Club of Arizona's Safety Enhancement Stipend
program to fund Police personal safety equipment. Further request authorization for
the City Treasurer to accept and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item.

Summary
The 100 Club of Arizona’s Safety Enhancement Stipend (SES) program was created in
2004 to provide assistance to public safety agencies for equipment to enhance the
safety of officers. The SES program allows agencies to obtain equipment and training
that is otherwise unavailable through other funding. The SES program allows agencies
to obtain crucial safety equipment to keep first responders safe.

Ballistic Vests for the Police Department
To ensure safety for the Neighborhood Enforcement Team within the Patrol Division at
the Police Department, access to up-to-date ballistic vests is crucial for their
protection. Ballistic vests are an integral piece of equipment for every patrol officer,
particularly those whose assignments focus on violent offender apprehension. This
critical piece of equipment ensures that these officers have the best chance at
surviving violent encounters with criminal actors armed with high caliber weapons. The
total investment for this initiative is estimated at $70,000.

The grant application is due by June 1, 2025. If approved, the Police Department will
move forward with submitting the application.

Contract Term
Term requirements are provided at the time of award; however, all funds will be
expended by the Police Department within one year of award acceptance.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City of Phoenix.




Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.








Report

Request Authorization of Donation of Phoenix Police Tahoe to Phoenix Police
Museum (Ordinance S-51892) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to approve the transfer and
sale of Phoenix Police Tahoe 811390 to the Phoenix Police Museum, a 501c3
organization, for $1. This vehicle has operated as a Phoenix Police Tahoe since 2008
and it has reached the end of its serviceability. This request is in accordance with
Phoenix Police Department Operations Order 3.6.03. Further request authorization for
the City Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller to disburse, all funds related to
this item.

Summary
This vehicle entered service with the Phoenix Police Department in 2008 and has
served as a Patrol Tahoe for the past 17 years. The age of the vehicle along with its
mileage and service record requires the vehicle to be replaced in the Department's
fleet. The vehicle has been well maintained and is professional in appearance.

The Police Museum was established in 1993 with a vision of "preserving our past, to
inspire our future." This vision holds true today, as the museum continues to provide
historical education to the community, both local and international. Currently, the
Museum maintains a small fleet of four antique police vehicles, which are displayed at
the museum and special events and used for educational presentations.

This request is for authorization of the donation of Tahoe 811390 to the Phoenix Police
Museum. The Museum will affix museum marking to this vehicle so it is not confused
with an active vehicle in the Police Department's fleet, and the museum agrees to
accept all liability, maintenance, and insurance responsibilities for this vehicle.

Financial Impact
This vehicle will be donated to the Phoenix Police Museum for the cost of $1.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.







Report

RSW Group, LLC New Hangar Lease at Phoenix Deer Valley Airport (Ordinance S
-51893) - District 1

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a new executive
hangar lease with RSW Group, LLC (RSW) at Phoenix Deer Valley Airport (DVT) for
five years with three one-year options to extend.

Summary
RSW currently occupies an executive hangar at DVT, with a premises consisting of a
10,000 square foot hangar building and approximately 2,924 square feet of office and
shop space where the company refurbishes and sells retired military jet aircraft. RSW
requests to enter into a new hangar lease for five years plus three one-year options to
extend.

Contract Term
The new lease term will be five years, which will commence retroactively on November
1, 2024, and expire on October 31, 2029, with three one-year renewal options to
extend at the sole discretion of the Aviation Director.

Financial Impact
Rent for the first year of the new lease will be approximately $170,079 at the rate of
$13.16 per square foot. Rent will be adjusted annually by the Phoenix-Mesa-
Scottsdale Consumer Price Index or three percent, whichever is greater. Total
anticipated revenue over the duration of the new lease will be approximately
$1,512,407 if all extension options are exercised.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board, Business and Development Subcommittee
recommended approval of the item on April 3, 2025, by a vote of 4-0.
The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board recommended approval of the item on April 17,
2025, by a vote of 6-0.

Location
Phoenix Deer Valley Airport: 702 W. Deer Valley Road
Council District: 1




Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.








Report

Worldwide Flight Service, Inc. New Facility Lease Agreement at Phoenix Sky
Harbor International Airport (Ordinance S-51894) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a new facility
lease with Worldwide Flight Service, Inc. (WFS) at Phoenix Sky Harbor International
Airport (PHX) for three years with four one-year options to extend.

Summary
WFS currently operates at the West Air Cargo facilities at PHX, where they provide
cargo handling services for Amazon operations under Commerical Use Permit 406-17
and a Cargo Facility Lease Agreement 152567. WFS requests to enter into a new
facility lease for approximately 38,094 square feet of space in West Air Cargo facilities
to continue to support its ongoing cargo handling services for Amazon.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement will be three years, which will commence retroactively on
February 14, 2025, and will expire on February 13, 2028, with four one-year options to
extend at the sole discretion of the Aviation Director.

Financial Impact
Rent for the first year of the lease will be approximately $656,033 at the rate per
square foot for space in West Air Cargo and West Air Cargo GSE facilities as set by
the PHX Rates and Charges provision of the Phoenix City Code. The cargo facilities
rental rate will be adjusted annually in accordance with Rates and Charges provision
of Article IX of Chapter 4 of the Phoenix City Code.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board, Business and Development Subcommittee
recommended approval to the Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board on April 3, 2025, by a
vote of 4-0.
The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board recommended approval to the Phoenix City
Council on April 17, 2025, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport: 2485 E. Buckeye Road



Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.








Report

Aviation Department Environmental Consulting On-Call Services for Fiscal Years
2025-26 to 2028-29 (Ordinance S-51883) - Districts 1, 8 & Out of City

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate
agreements with the ten consultants listed in Attachment A, to provide Environmental
Consulting On-Call Services for the Aviation Department for Fiscal Years 2025-26 to
2028-29. Further request authorization to execute amendments to the agreements as
necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below, and
for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total fee for all
services will not exceed $10 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunications, cable
television, railroads, and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize
inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City
Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real
property.

Summary
The on-call consultants will be responsible for providing On-Call Environmental
Consulting Services for Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, Phoenix Deer Valley
Airport, Phoenix Goodyear Airport, and Aviation-owned properties on an as-needed
basis. Some firms will provide multiple category services.

Environmental services have been grouped into two scope categories that may
include, but are not limited to:
· Category 1: soil, vapor, drinking water, and groundwater sampling; remediation
projects; modeling of soil vapor and groundwater contamination; water distribution
systems; storm water pollution prevention plans; spill prevention control and
countermeasure plans; environmental site assessments; environmental studies;


and other related services as required.
· Category 2: environmental data and information support services; technical and
scientific calculations, analysis, and reporting; regulatory compliance programs and
research; environmental permits; environmental training; and other related services
as required.

Procurement Information
The selections were made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
Section 34-604 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
Section 34-604(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Eighteen firms submitted
proposals for Scope Category 1 and nine firms submitted proposals for Scope
Category 2 and are listed in Attachment A.

Contract Term
The term of each agreement is up to four years, or up to $1 million, whichever occurs
first. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the
term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for each of the on-call consultants will not exceed $1 million,
including all subconsultant and reimbursable costs. The total fee for all services will not
exceed $10 million.

Funding is available in the Aviation Department’s Capital Improvement Program and
Operating budgets. The Budget and Research Department will review and approve
funding availability prior to issuance of any on-call task order of $100,000 or more.
Payments may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services,
which may extend past the agreement termination.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 2485 E. Buckeye Road
Phoenix Deer Valley Airport - 702 W. Deer Valley Road
Phoenix Goodyear Airport - 1658 S. Litchfield Road, Goodyear, Arizona
Council Districts: 1, 8, and Out of City

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
Mario Paniagua, the City Engineer and the Aviation Department.


ATTACHMENT A
Selected Firms by Category
Scope Category 1:
Rank 1: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Rank 2: Clear Creek Associates, LLC
Rank 3: WSP USA, Inc.
Rank 4: Adams and Wendt, Inc.
Rank 5: AECOM Technical Services, Inc.

Additional Proposers:
Rank 6: CDM Smith Inc.
Rank 7: AZTEC Engineering Group, Inc.
Rank 8: GHD Services, Inc.
Rank 9: LANGAN Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.
Rank 10: Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Rank 11: Stearns, Conrad & Schmidt Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Rank 12: Environmental Technology, LLC
Rank 13: Partner Engineering and Science, Inc.
Rank 14: Atlas Technical Consultants, LLC
Rank 15: Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical and Environmental Sciences
Consultants
Rank 16: Broadbent & Associates, Inc.
Rank 17: AMTECH Associates, LLC
Rank 18: ALTA CMTI, LLC dba ALTA Arizona

Selected Firms by Category
Scope Category 2:
Rank 1: CDM Smith Inc.
Rank 2: WSP USA, Inc.
Rank 3: GHD Services, Inc.
Rank 4: AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
Rank 5: LANGAN Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.

Additional Proposers:
Rank 6: Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Rank 7: Partner Engineering and Science, Inc.
Rank 8: ALTA CMTI, LLC dba ALTA Arizona
Rank 9: AMTECH Associates, LLC







Report

Citywide Environmental Site Assessment On-Call Consulting Services for Fiscal
Years 2025-26 - 2027-28 (Ordinance S-51867) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into 12 separate
agreements with the consultants listed in Attachment A, to provide Environmental Site
Assessment On-Call services citywide for Fiscal Years 2025-26 through 2027-28.
Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreements as
necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below, and
for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total fee for all
services will not exceed $18 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunications, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize
inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City
Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real
property.

Summary
The On-Call consultants will be responsible for providing Environmental Site
Assessment On-Call consulting services that include, but are not limited to: providing
Phase I, Phase II, and Phase III Environmental Site Assessments, biological surveys,
brownfields related work, environmental program support services, and other related
environmental studies and investigations on real property for the City of Phoenix.

Procurement Information
The selections were made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
Section 34-604 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
Section 34-604(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Twenty-two firms submitted



proposals and are listed in Attachment A.

Contract Term
The term of each agreement is up to three years, or up to $1,500,000, whichever
occurs first. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end
of the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination
of the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for each of the On-Call consultants will not exceed $1,500,000,
including all subconsultant and reimbursable costs. The total fee for all services will not
exceed $18 million.

Funding is available in the Capital Improvement Program and Operating budgets for
departments citywide. The Budget and Research Department will review and approve
funding availability prior to issuance of any On-Call task order of $100,000 or more.
Payments may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services,
which may extend past the agreement termination.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, the Street
Transportation Department and the City Engineer.





ATTACHMENT A


Selected Firms
Rank 1: GHD Services, Inc.
Rank 2: Brown and Caldwell, Inc.
Rank 3: Adams & Wendt, Inc.
Rank 4: Alpha Geotechnical & Materials, Inc.
Rank 5: Atlas Technical Consultants, Inc.
Rank 6: Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Rank 7: Aztec Engineering Group, Inc.
Rank 8: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Rank 9: Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Rank 10: NV5, Inc.
Rank 11: WSP USA, Inc.
Rank 12: Partner Engineering and Science, Inc.

Additional Proposers
Rank 13: Western Technologies, Inc.
Rank 14: Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical and Environmental
Sciences Consultants, Inc.
Rank 15: The VERTEX Companies, LLC
Rank 16: Pinyon Environmental, Inc.
Rank 17: Sevee & Maher Engineers, Inc.
Rank 18: Dudek
Rank 19: Broadbent & Associates, Inc.
Rank 20: AMTECH Associates, Inc.
Rank 21: Grouse Mountain Environmental Consultants, LLC
Rank 22: Speedie & Associates, LLC







Report

Local Drainage Mitigation Package 3 - Design-Bid-Build Services - ST83140112,
ST83140117, ST83140118, ST83140124, PW26220003 ARPA (Ordinance S-51868) -
Districts 3, 4, 6, 7 & 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to accept TF Contracting
Services LLC as the lowest-priced, responsive and responsible bidder and to enter into
an agreement with TF Contracting Services LLC for Design-Bid-Build Services for the
Local Drainage Mitigation Package 3 Design-Bid-Build American Rescue Plan Act
(ARPA) Project. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The fee for services will not exceed $4,628,173.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to construct drainage improvements at multiple locations
including:
· City of Phoenix Printing Services facility onsite storm water collection system
improvements.
· 18th Street storm drain improvements from Earl Drive to Catalina Drive and from
Catalina Drive to 16th Street.
· 23rd Avenue storm drain improvements north of Indian School Road to Heatherbrae
Drive.
· 48th Place and Flower Street storm drain improvements.
· City Clerk Customer Service Center parking lot improvements.

TF Contracting Services LLC's services include, but are not limited to:
· Construction of two area drain catch basins.
· Construction of 18-inch and 24-inch storm drain pipes, storm drain manholes, three
catch basins and lateral pipes.
· Construction of three catch basins, lateral pipes, and reconstruction of restrained
joint water service pipes and a fire hydrant.
· Construction of a 30-inch storm drain pipe, storm drain manholes, two catch basins
and lateral pipes.
· Re-paving 6,400 square yards of the existing parking lot for the City Clerk Customer
Service Center.




The selection was made using an Invitation for Bids procurement process set forth in
Section 34-201 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. Three bids were received on
November 13, 2024 and were sent to the Equal Opportunity Department for review to
determine subcontractor eligibility and contractor responsiveness in demonstrating
responsiveness to Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program requirements. A
DBE goal has not been established for this project.

The Opinion of Probable Cost and the three lowest responsive, responsible bidders
are listed below:
· Opinion of Probable Cost: $3,678,402.55
· TF Contracting Services LLC: $4,628,173
· Action Direct LLC: $6,696,090

Bidders who were deemed non-responsive are listed below, in alphabetical order:
· FPS Civil, LLC

Although the bid exceeds the Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Cost by more than 10
percent, it has been determined the bid represents a fair and reasonable price for the
required work scope. Additionally, the bid award amount is within the total budget for
this project.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is 300 calendar days from issuance of the Notice to
Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of
the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of
the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for TF Contracting Services LLC will not exceed $4,628,173,
including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.

This project will utilize federal funds and is subject to the requirements of 49 Code of
Federal Regulations Part 26 and the U.S. Department of Transportation DBE program.
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget using ARPA funds. The Budget and Research Department will
separately review and approve funding availability prior to execution of any
amendments. Payments may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered
agreement services, which may extend past the agreement termination.





Location
· 22nd Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road
· 18th Street and Pinchot Avenue
· 23rd Avenue and Devonshire Avenue
· 48th Place and Flower Street
· 22nd Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road

Council Districts: 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, the Street
Transportation Department and the City Engineer.








Report

Water Booster Pump Station Replacement Program Manager - Engineering
Services - WS85100032 (Ordinance S-51869) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Black and Veatch Corporation to provide Engineering Services that include
assessment, program management, project management, design, and construction
administration and inspection services for the Water Booster Pump Station
Replacement Program Manager Project. Further request to authorize execution of
amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure
authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item. The total fee for services will not exceed $2.5 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services related to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable
television, railroads, and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the
documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This
authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to work closely with the Water Services Department
Engineering and Operations teams as well as potential Job Order Contractors to assist
with identifying, scheduling, and budgeting Capital Improvement Projects for future
fiscal years and developing future assessment and rehabilitation cycles of the Booster
Pump Stations (BPS) Program.

Black and Veatch Corporation's services include, but are not limited to: identifying the
projects needed for the current program duration; completing site visits to each of the
four BPSs; and providing photos of equipment, tags, visual condition notes, and other
tasks as needed to collect data to calculate risk of failure and consequences of failure
for each BPS site. The program manager will develop criteria for prioritizing projects



and perform assessments for the booster pump stations; track and keep information
regarding repairs and rehabilitation made to each BPS; and provide detailed cost
estimates for each station. Minor design and construction administration and
inspection services will be provided as needed for small BPS improvements.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
Section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
Section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Three firms submitted proposals
and are listed below.

Selected Firm
Rank 1: Black and Veatch Corporation

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: Wilson Engineers, LLC
Rank 3: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Black and Veatch Corporation will not exceed $2.5 million,
including all subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement
Program. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
Ginger Spencer, the City Engineer and the Water Services Department.








Report

Well 6A-W319, Booster Pump Station 8A-B3 and Pressure Reducing Valve
Station 6A-R2 - Construction Manager at Risk Services - WS85010045 and
WS85010054 (Ordinance S-51870) - District 2

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with MGC Contractors, Inc. to provide Construction Manager at Risk Preconstruction
and Construction Services for the Well 6A-W319, Booster Pump Station 8A-B3 and
Pressure Reducing Valve Station 6A-R2 project. Further request to authorize
execution of amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved
expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The fee for services will not exceed $20.2 million.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to redevelop an existing potable groundwater production
well site to bring the inactive well back into service.

MGC Contractors, Inc. will begin in an agency support role for Construction Manager
at Risk Preconstruction Services. MGC Contractors, Inc. will assume the risk of
delivering the project through a Guaranteed Maximum Price agreement.

MGC Contractors, Inc.’s Preconstruction Services include, but are not limited to:
providing detailed cost estimating and knowledge of marketplace conditions; project
planning and scheduling; construction phasing and scheduling that will minimize
interruption to City operations; alternate systems evaluation and constructability
studies; advise City on ways to gain efficiencies in project delivery; long-lead
procurement studies and initiate procurement of long-lead items; assist in the
permitting processes; protect the City's sensitivity to quality, safety, and environmental
factors; and participating with the City in a process to establish a Small Business
Enterprise (SBE) goal for the project.

MGC Contractors, Inc.’s initial Construction Services will include preparation of a
Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal provided under the agreement. MGC
Contractors, Inc. will be responsible for construction means and methods related to the
project and fulfilling the SBE program requirements. MGC Contractors, Inc. will be
required to solicit bids from pre-qualified subcontractors and to perform the work using



the City’s subcontractor selection process. MGC Contractors, Inc. may also compete
to self-perform limited amounts of work.

MGC Contractors, Inc.'s additional Construction Services include: equip the existing
well with all new well equipment; construct the boost pump station, pressure reducing
valve station, and all associated infrastructure; select subcontractors and suppliers for
this project; prepare a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal that meets the approval of
the City; coordinate with various City of Phoenix departments, other agencies, and
utility companies; arrange for procurement of materials and equipment; schedule and
manage site operations; bid, award, and manage all construction related contracts
while meeting City bid requirements including the local and SBE participation goal,
provide quality controls, and bond and insure the construction.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
Section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
Section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Six firms submitted proposals
and are listed below:

Selected Firm
Rank 1: MGC Contractors, Inc.

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: Felix Construction Company
Rank 3: Hunter Contracting Co.
Rank 4: Filanc
Rank 5: KEAR Civil Corporation
Rank 6: Hensel Phelps Construction Co.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from issuance of the Notice to Proceed. Work
scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term may
be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for MGC Contractors, Inc. will not exceed $20.2 million, including
all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement Program


budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.

Location
General Location: N. 56th Street and E. Pinnacle Peak Road
Council District: 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
Ginger Spencer, the City Engineer and the Water Services Department.








Report

Water Production Wells 311, 319, and 320 - Engineering Services - WS85010054
and WS85010045 (Ordinance S-51871) - District 2

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Carollo Engineers, Inc. to provide Engineering Services that include design and
possible construction administration and inspection services for the Water Production
Wells 311, 319, and 320 project. Further request to authorize execution of
amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure
authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item. The fee for services will not exceed $5.7 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services related to the
development, design and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the
documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This
authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to finish development on three well site projects that
were previously under the Water Production Wells and ASR Wells Phase 2 project.

Carollo Engineers, Inc.’s services include, but are not limited to: new groundwater
production wells, including all new well equipment; arsenic treatment facility,
equalization basin, with pump-to-waste and sewer discharge pumps; installation of
mechanical equipment for the well, such as exposed and buried piping, valves, and
actuators; new electrical equipment and all new instrumentation, and site egress,
grading, and drainage improvements.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in



Section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
Section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Two firms submitted proposals
and are listed below:

Selected Firm
Rank 1: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Additional Proposer
Rank 2: Narasimhan Consulting Services, Inc. dba NCS Engineers

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Carollo Engineers, Inc. will not exceed $5.7 million, including
all subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.

Location
General Locations: N. 40th Street and E. Jomax Road; N. 48th Street and N. Tatum
Boulevard; and N. 56th Street and E. Deer Valley Drive
Council District: 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
Ginger Spencer, the City Engineer and the Water Services Department.








Report

Sub-Regional Operating Group 91st Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant 1A
Rehabilitation - Engineering Services - WS90100114 (Ordinance S-51876) -
District 7

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Hazen and Sawyer, P.C. to provide Engineering Services that include design and
construction administration and inspection services for the Sub-Regional Operating
Group 91st Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant 1A Rehabilitation Project. Further
request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreement as necessary within
the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The fee for services will not exceed
$5 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services related to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable
television, railroads, and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the
documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This
authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to rehabilitate or replace assets throughout Plant 1A at
the 91st Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant and incorporate current technologies
and equipment. Rehabilitation or replacement of assets throughout the Plant 1A
treatment train, may include, but is not limited to: primary sedimentation, aeration,
secondary sedimentation, reuse water system, disinfection, ancillary equipment and
systems, process air supply and distribution systems, and electrical and control
systems.

Hazen and Sawyer, P.C.'s services include, but are not limited to: conducting pre-
construction meetings; preparing a basis of design, including life-cycle cost analyses to



determine whether replacement or rehabilitation should be implemented to address
deficiencies; performing assessment site visits to the Wastewater Treatment Plant;
compiling existing record drawings for Plant 1A; conducting field surveys as required;
and obtaining all required permits for the construction and operation of the
modifications. Hazen will prepare complete sets of construction documents and any
necessary special documents for the construction of the project. In conjunction with
City engineering, operations, and maintenance staff, the engineering firm will provide
necessary programming services to update and modify the facility's computer control
and information systems. The firm will provide quality control services during the
course of construction to assure that the overall correctness of the construction phase
services is being followed and the schedule is being met.

The 91st Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant is owned by the Sub-Regional
Operating Group (SROG) and operated by the City of Phoenix.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
Section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
Section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Six firms submitted proposals
and are listed below.

Selected Firm
Rank 1: Hazen and Sawyer, P.C.

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: Wilson Engineers, LLC
Rank 3: Carollo Engineers, Inc.
Rank 4: Water Works Engineers, LLC
Rank 5: Black & Veatch Corporation
Rank 6: Consor North America, Inc.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Hazen and Sawyer, P.C. will not exceed $5 million, including
all subconsultant and reimbursable costs.



Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget utilizing SROG funds.

Location
91st Avenue and W. Roeser Road
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
Ginger Spencer, the City Engineer and the Water Services Department.








Report

Shelving for Warehouses - IFB 2021-WAD-443 - Amendment (Ordinance S-51889)
- Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 154786 with AADS Office Solutions Int'l, LLC, for the
purchase of shelving for the Water Services Department. Further request to authorize
the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional
expenditures will not exceed $240,000.

Summary
This contract will provide additional reconfiguring of existing shelving and add new
shelving to improve the Water Services Department's warehouse storage for the
purposes of safety and efficiency. This contract provides space planning, design,
evaluation of current shelving, new shelving, and repairs of existing shelving and
racking systems.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on July 31, 2026.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $240,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $750,000. Funds are available in the Water Services
Department’s budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Shelving Agreement 154786 (Ordinance S-47743) on June 23, 2021.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Water
Services Department.








Report

Abandonment of Easements - ABND 250001 - 2600 W. Sonoran Drive (Resolution
22300) - District 2

Abandonment: 250001
Project: 01-1415
Applicant: Chuck Chisholm
Request: To abandon a rectangular drainage easement, totaling 63,066 square feet,
located immediately north of W. Sonoran Desert Drive; an irregular shaped drainage
easement, totaling 98,099 square feet, immediately south of N. Foothills Drive; a
trapezoid drainage easement, totaling 1,022 square feet, located near the southeast
corner north of W. Sonoran Desert Drive and N. Valley Parkway; a rectangular
sidewalk easement, totaling to 5,783 square feet, located west of N. Valley Parkway;
and a temporary drainage easement at the northwest corner of W. Sonoran Desert
Drive and N. Valley Parkway.
Date of Hearing: March 13, 2025

Location
Generally located at 2600 W. Sonoran Drive
Council District: 2

Financial Impact
None. No consideration fee was required as a part of this submittal, although filing fees
were paid.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





Attachment A
ABND 250001




1 inch = 219 feet
Disclaimer : The information provided on this map is based on record drawings submitted by others.
129 0 95 190 380 Feet Date: 1/24/2025
Users of this information are cautioned that independent verification of actual conditions may be necessary. Printing Water Data is for Internal Staff Only ±



Report

Abandonment of Right-of-Way - ABND 240001 - 3501 E. Hazelwood Street
(Resolution 22299) - District 6

Abandonment: 240001
Project: 02-2314
Applicant: Liridon Ulaj
Request: To abandon a portion of the East Hazelwood Street right-of-way that fronts
3501 E. Hazelwood Street.
Date of Hearing: February 8, 2024

Location
Generally located at 3501 E. Hazelwood Street
Council District: 6

Financial Impact
A fee was also collected as part of this abandonment in the amount of $517.10.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.








Report

Abandonment of Right-of-Way - ABND 250003 - 1246 E. Oregon Avenue
(Resolution 22301) - District 6

Abandonment: 250003
Project: 93-0001274
Applicant: Jarrin Solomon, House of Oak, LLC
Request: To abandon a 15 foot by 127.07 foot (1,906 square foot) portion of right-of-
way dedication that abuts 1246 E. Oregon Avenue.
Date of Hearing: March 13, 2025

Location
Generally located by 1246 E. Oregon Avenue
Council District: 6

Financial Impact
A fee was also collected as part of this abandonment in the amount of $570.70.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.








Report

Approval of a Historic Preservation Demonstration Project Grant - 412 W.
Roosevelt Street (Ordinance S-51882) - District 7

This report requests the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into the necessary
agreements and conveyances with Prairie School Apartments, LLC and its
representative Chip Halquist related to a Historic Preservation Demonstration Project
Grant of up to $133,176 to assist with the rehabilitation of the historic apartment
building located at 412 W. Roosevelt Street. Further request for the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item.

Summary
The historic apartment building located at 412 W. Roosevelt Street was constructed
around the year 1918 and listed in the National Register of Historic Places in 1983 and
the Phoenix Historic Property Register in 1986 as part of the Roosevelt Historic
District. The property is considered an outstanding example of "Prairie School"
architecture and is one of the few extant apartment buildings constructed in Phoenix
immediately following World War I. The building is still being used as apartments today.

The current owner of 412 W. Roosevelt Street, Prairie School Apartments, LLC,
acquired the property in 2017, although the owner's representative Chip Halquist has
owned it since the early 1990s. Mr. Halquist submitted a Demonstration Project Grant
application to the Historic Preservation Office on January 30, 2025, requesting
assistance to rehabilitate the building for its continued use as apartments.

The project scope of work includes historic window rehabilitation, stucco repairs, wood
fascia and soffit repair, roof repair, door repair, interior and exterior stairway repair, attic
and crawlspace venting, and repainting. A total of $2,500 in eligible engineering costs
is also included. The grand total of eligible work items is $133,176.

Although the application shows that the City's share would be 50 percent of the cost of
the eligible work, the Historic Preservation Commission, at its February 10, 2025
meeting, revised the Demonstration Project Grant Program so the City will now pay
100 percent of eligible work items, provided that the owner provides a match using non
-eligible work items. The application indicates that there will be $747,000 worth of


additional work, so the match requirement has been met.

Staff recommends allocating the use of $133,176 in available Demonstration Project
Grant funds for the project.

If approved, the grant funds will be disbursed to the applicant on a reimbursement
basis. The applicant will be required to provide evidence of a dollar-for-dollar match.

Financial Impact
The requested amount, $133,176, is available from the 2023 General Obligation Bond
Program - Historic Preservation. In exchange for the grant funds, the City will receive a
30-year conservation easement on the property. The easement will require that the
property be preserved and that it be insured and maintained in good repair once
rehabilitation is completed.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Historic Preservation Commission recommended approval of the grant funding on
March 17, 2025, by a vote of 5-0.

The Transportation, Infrastructure and Planning Subcommittee recommend approval of
this item on April 16, 2025, by a 4-0 vote.

Location
412 W. Roosevelt Street
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.








Report

Amend City Code - Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1282 (Ordinance G-7384)
- District 6

Request to authorize the City Manager to amend Section 601 of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1282. This amendment
reflects that the property owner has met all of the rezoning conditions previously
approved by City Council with a portion of Z-28-83-6 and the entitlements are fully
vested.

Summary
To rezone a parcel located approximately 697 feet north of the northwest corner of the
intersection of 50th Street and Ray Road.
Application No.: Z-28-83-6
Zoning: R-4 PCD
Owner: MG Sonoran Apartments LLC; MG Sonoran Apartments BSR LLC; MG
Sonoran Apartments ACF LLC; MG Sonoran Apartments RIA LLC
Acreage: 7.07

Location
Located approximately 697 feet north of the northwest corner of the intersection of
50th Street and Ray Road.
Address: 13625 S. 48th Street
Council District: 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADOPTING OFFICIAL
SUPPLEMENTARY ZONING MAP 1282.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as

follows:

SECTION 1. That Section 601 of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance is

hereby amended by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1282, which

accompanies and is annexed to this ordinance and declared a part hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 7th day of May,

2025.



________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


____________________________City Clerk



APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney




By:_________________________

_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




DI:arm:LF25-0779:05-07-2025







Report

Amend City Code - Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1283 (Ordinance G-7383)
- District 6

Request to authorize the City Manager to amend Section 601 of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1283. This
amendment reflects that the property owner has met all of the rezoning conditions
previously approved by City Council with Z-28-G-83-6 and the entitlements are fully
vested.

Summary
To rezone a parcel located approximately 250 feet north and 650 feet east of the
northeast corner of the intersection of 48th Street and Ray Road.
Application No.: Z-28-G-83-6
Zoning: C-2 SP PCD
Owner: Foothills Shopping Center, L.L.C.
Acreage: 0.06

Location
Located approximately 250 feet north and 650 feet east of the northeast corner of
the intersection of 48th Street and Ray Road
Address: 4940 E. Ray Road
Council District: 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning
and Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADOPTING OFFICIAL
SUPPLEMENTARY ZONING MAP 1283.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as

follows:

SECTION 1. That Section 601 of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance is

hereby amended by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1283, which

accompanies and is annexed to this ordinance and declared a part hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 7th day of May,

2025.



________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


____________________________City Clerk



APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney




By:_________________________

_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




DI:arm:LF25-0778:05-07-2025







Report

Desert Ridge Specific Plan, Development Parcel 5.A, Parcel G - Northwest
Corner of 56th Street and the Loop 101 Freeway - District 2

Review of proposed plans for buildings in excess of four stories in Development Parcel
5.A of the Desert Ridge Specific Plan per requirements in the Desert Ridge Specific
Plan and the Peripheral Areas C and D General Plan. This request requires Formal
Action only.

Summary
Current Zoning: C-2 DRSP
Acreage: Approximately 20 acres
Proposed Use: Mixed use

Owner: ZT 56TH STREET AT 101 NW FS OWNER, LLC
Applicant/Representative: Benjamin Tate, Withey Morris Baugh, P.L.C.

Staff Recommendation: Staff finds the submittal to meet the requirements of the
Desert Ridge Specific Plan and the Areas C and D General Plan.
VPC Action: The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this item on April 1,
2025 and affirmed the plans without formal comment by a vote of 12-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on April 3, 2025 and confirmed
that the proposed plans are consistent with and meet the intentions of the Desert
Ridge Specific Plan and the Areas C and D General Plan by a vote of 8-0.

Location
Northwest corner of 56th Street and the Loop 101 freeway
Council District: 2
Parcel Address: 20400 N. 56th Street

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A




DESERT RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN – SUPERBLOCK 5, DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL 5.A, PARCEL G
STAFF ANALYSIS

Desert View Village Planning April 1, 2025
Committee Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: April 3, 2025

Acreage: Approximately 20 acres
Request: Review of proposed plans for buildings in
excess of four stories per Chapter 4, Section
E.2.a.2 of the Desert Ridge Specific Plan
Location: Northwest corner of 56th Street and the Loop
101 freeway
Owner: ZT 56TH STREET AT 101 NW FS OWNER
LLC
Applicant/Representative: Benjamin Tate, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Staff finds the submittal to meet the
requirements of Chapter 4, Section E.2.a.2 of
the Desert Ridge Specific Plan

Background

ZT 56TH STREET AT 101 NW OWNER LLC ("ZOM"), is the owner of approximately 20
acres of vacant land, referred to as Parcel G, located at the northwest corner of 56th
Street and the Loop 101 freeway, within Superblock 5, Development Parcel 5.A of the
Desert Ridge Specific Plan, which is the Desert View Village Primary Core. The
allowable uses are outlined in the Desert Ridge Specific Plan and generally follow the
permitted uses in the C-2 (Intermediate Commercial) zoning district. ZOM has
requested confirmation that their proposal meets the requirements found in Chapter 4,
Section E.2.a.2 of the Desert Ridge Specific Plan, which states that individual projects
with buildings that exceed four stories in height are subject to review by the Village
Planning Committee, Planning Commission and City Council.

Desert Ridge Specific Plan

The Desert Ridge Specific Plan was adopted in 1990 and encompasses approximately
5,700 acres in North Phoenix. The Arizona State Land Department owned all the land in
Desert Ridge and has auctioned off the land over time for residential, commercial and
commerce park development. Throughout the years, there have been amendments to



Staff Analysis: Desert Ridge Specific Plan – Superblock 5, Development Parcel 5.A.
March 21, 2025

the Desert Ridge Specific Plan, which range from basic clean-ups to larger density
shifts, and changes in uses. Chapter 4 of the Desert Ridge Specific Plan, which is the
subject of this request, was amended in 1998 to add additional requirements for the
floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for the mixture of uses in the Core. In addition, the amendment
added a requirement for public hearing review of buildings exceeding four stories in
height.

Superblock 5

Since the inception of the Desert Ridge Specific Plan in 1990, Superblock 5 has been
envisioned as the Primary Core of the Desert View Village. Superblock 5 includes three
separate development parcels – Development Parcel 5.A, Development Parcel 5.B, and
Development Parcel 5.C.

Development Parcel 5.A, the subject development parcel of this request, is bounded by
Deer Valley Drive to the north, 56th Street to the east, the Loop 101 freeway to the
south, and Tatum Boulevard to the west. Portions of Development Parcel 5.A have
developed over the years, including the Desert Ridge Marketplace and the High Street
development, which demonstrates appropriate massing and pedestrian-scale
development envisioned for the Core. ZOM is planning for development for one of the
remaining vacant parcels within Development Parcel 5.A. The main difference between
Development Parcel 5.A, Development Parcel 5.B, Development Parcel 5.C is that
Development Parcel 5.A is permitted to have a maximum building height of 140 feet,
given other conditions are met. The Desert Ridge Specific Plan addresses specific
development standards, such as floor area ratio, parking and pedestrian circulation.

Request

Chapter 4, Section E.2.a.2 of the Desert Ridge Specific Plan states that individual
parcels within Development Parcel 5.A shall be subject to review by the Village
Planning Committee, Planning Commission and City Council if the proposed building
height exceeds four stories. The review is limited to confirming that the proposed plans
are consistent with and meet the intentions of the Desert Ridge Specific Plan and the
Areas C and D General Plan. ZOM has requested confirmation that the submitted plans
for Parcel G meets the requirements of the above-mentioned section.

Findings

ZOM’s plans date stamped March 13, 2025 meet the provision in the Desert Ridge
Specific Plan found in Chapter 4, Section E.2.a.2.

1. The Desert Ridge Specific Plan will still regulate F.A.R., setbacks, pedestrian
circulation and vehicular circulation within the area, which will regulate the
intensity of proposed development.




Staff Analysis: Desert Ridge Specific Plan – Superblock 5, Development Parcel 5.A.
March 21, 2025



2. The intent behind the provision listed in Chapter 4, Section E.2.a.2 is that
appropriate massing and step backs are provided. The applicant is providing a
building height exhibit that illustrates step backs from public rights-of-way.

3. Development Parcel 5.A is the Desert View Village Primary Core where high-
density and high-intensity development is envisioned and encouraged. The
proposed height is appropriate given the location.

4. The proposal is consistent with Goal 1 and Goal 3 of the Peripheral Areas C and
D General Plan by concentrating higher-intensity development within the
designated Village Core and therefore focusing infrastructure investments to
achieve maximum benefit.

Recommendation

Staff is supportive of the applicant’s submittal date stamped March 13, 2025 and find
that they meet the requirements of Chapter 4, Section E.2.a.2. All development shall
adhere to the building heights and step backs shown on the building height exhibit.

Writer
Adrian Zambrano
March 21, 2025

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
Superblock 5 Map (2 pages)
Applicant’s submittal materials date stamped March 13, 2025 (23 pages)




Desert Ridge Specific Plan - Superblock 5 - Development Parcel 5.A - Parcel G


PINNACLE PEAK RD ¯
PL
D TH ER
TR CA 39 HT ST
44TH PL
SH
EM MA 39T
ON N
DALEY LN
41ST
E
DR PL
DR
W FR HA
R LO MB 54TH
HA LIN
AY DR
ST GW
T KE SIN ROUG
PI OS H RIDE
Y CR R RD
CAVE BUTTE ST 31S SK T T
TS HS TS
T
WAY
WA
Y 40 51S
T
36TH S
TIN 36TH NO RA
AD DE NG
R E RV M ER
AV DR
IA AL R 59TH
ST LE AR 59 ST
TH
YD TH ER
R PL
37 IOT HT
LONE CACTUS DR R 59T
TD
ST
CO
BB 61ST
58TH ST LE
WA
BLACK MOUNTAIN BLVD

ROSE Y
G ARDE HIG
N LN HS
T
CIT
YN
OR 55TH ST
MOHAWK LN TH
D R



BEARDSLEY RD


33RD ST
v
w
37 56TH ST
ORAIBI DR TH
32ND ST W £
¤ 51 TATUM BLVD
AY MAYO BLVD
SEQUOIA DR
UTOPIA RD
KRISTAL WAY

28TH PL 29TH PL CLARK RD
SIESTA WESCOTT DR
Parcel G LN
38TH ST

ROSEMON
Development TE DR
Parcel 5.A
34TH ST
30TH ST
Development Parcel 5.B
UNION HILLS DR
28TH ST Development Parcel 5.C 3RD
PL 66TH ST
64TH ST
42ND PL
Superblock 5
DESERT CACTUS ST MARINO DR MIC
29TH ST HE
Desert Ridge Specific Plan LLE 68TH ST
40TH PL 42ND ST
DR
0 0.5 1
CHARLESTON AVE 1.5 2 Miles
Parcel Lines
30TH PL LIBBY ST 52ND ST
44TH ST
146 GROVERS AVE
S:\Information Systems\GIS\Projects\DesertRidgeSpecificPlan_Superblock_5_Development_Parcel_5.A_Parcel_G\DesertRidgeSpecificPlan-Superblock_5-Development_Parcel_5.A-Parcel_G.aprx
Desert Ridge Specific Plan - Superblock 5 - Development Parcel 5.A - Parcel G
ME
LIN
44T DA
HS HP LN
T L
44T
HP 46T
L
H PL
45T ABR 48TH PL
AHA ¯
M LN
DEE
RV
ALL
EY
DR


T DR

RIOT

MAR




L
52N 56TH ST
DP
HIG
T H ST
DS T
53R HS
PAR
K PLA
54T
CE
PAR NO
KP RTH
TATUM BLVD LAC 55TH ST
ES
OU
TH T EN
CIT
Y NO
D AV
RTH E
101 DR
v
w EAS




Parcel G MAYO BLVD

Desert Ridge Superblock 5

Development Parcel 5.A
SAGUAR
O CIR
Development Parcel 5.B

Development Parcel 5.C
PALO V
ERDE DR 0 0.13 0.25 0.38 0.5 Miles
Parcel Lines
S:\Information Systems\GIS\Projects\DesertRidgeSpecificPlan_Superblock_5_Development_Parcel_5.A_Parcel_G\DesertRidgeSpecificPlan-Superblock_5-Development_Parcel_5.A-Parcel_G.aprx
CITY OF PHOENIX
MAR 13 2025
Planning & Development
Department




March 13, 2025


Sarah Stockham
Phoenix Planning & Development Department
200 West Washington Street, 2nd Floor
Phoenix, Arizona 85003

Re: Parcel G Height Approval Request – Desert Ridge Development Parcel 5.A

Dear Sarah:

This request is being submitted on behalf of ZT 56TH STREET AT 101 NW FS OWNER LLC, and its successors and
assigns (“ZOM”), owner of approximately 20 acres of vacant land located at the northwest corner of 56 th Street and
Loop 101 in Phoenix, AZ (the “Property”) as shown on the Aerial Map attached at Tab 1. The Property is located
within Development Parcel 5.A of the Desert Ridge Specific Plan Area and is identified as Parcel G on the approved
Conceptual Parcel Site Plan for Development Parcel 5.A as illustrated in the Desert Ridge Specific Plan Area Map
and Approved CPSP at Tabs 2 and 3, respectively.

Pursuant to Development Parcel Regulations in Section D.5.A.3 of the Specific Plan, buildings in Development Parcel
5.A shall not exceed 140 feet. Chapter 4, Section E.2.a.2 of the Desert Ridge Specific Plan (the “Specific Plan”),
buildings within Development Parcel 5.A taller than four stories are subject to review by the Village Planning
Committee, Planning Commission and City Council. Per the Specific Plan, the scope of review is limited to confirming
that the proposed plans are consistent with and meet the intentions of the Desert Ridge Specific Plan and Areas C
and D General Plan. In the fall of 2020, Crown Realty and Development (“Crown”), Declarant in the Commercial Core
and owner of approximately 102 of the 155 total acres within Development Parcel 5.A, applied for and obtained
approval for buildings up to 140 feet on its properties within Development Parcel 5.A.

Consistent with the approvals obtained by Crown and the development standards and guidelines outlined in the
Specific Plan, ZOM is requesting approval to allow buildings up to 140 feet on the Property. As illustrated by the
enclosed plans, the height request observes the stepbacks and setbacks required by the Specific Plan. Moreover,
the height request is not a blanket approval – F.A.R., setbacks, pedestrian circulation, and vehicular circulation are
all regulated the Specific Plan and will ultimately dictate the intensity of the overall development of the Property.
Crown, as Commercial Core Declarant, has approved ZOM’s proposed building height request as indicated by the
proposed amendment to the CPSP attached here at Tab 4.

The exhibits illustrate two conceptual scenarios: 1) all buildings within the Property at 140 feet height limit (Proposed
Height Request - Page 6), and 2) the approved Azola at Desert Ridge multi-family project (“Azola”) on approximately
12 acres of the Property and buildings on the remaining 8 acres utilizing the 140-foot height limit (Current Proposed
Plan – Page 8). Although ZOM is currently moving forward with the Azola project, we are nonetheless seeking the
140-foot maximum approval for the entire 20 acres of the Property to ensure flexibility for future development.

In light of the foregoing, ZOM respectfully requests approval to allow buildings up to 140 feet on the Property, subject
to the development standards in the Specific Plan and Conceptual Parcel Site Plan for Development Parcel 5.A. As




CITY OF PHOENIX
MAR 13 2025
March 13, 2025
Page 2 Planning & Development
Department

outlined above, this request meets the requirements specified in Chapter 4, Section E.2.a.2 of the Specific Plan and
is consistent with approved height requests for other parcels within Development Parcel 5.A.

Very truly yours,

WITHEY MORRIS BAUGH P.L.C.


By
Benjamin L. Tate

Attachments




CITY OF PHOENIX
MAR 13 2025
Planning & Development
Department



TAB 1




Aerial Map




CITY OF PHOENIX
MAR 13 2025
NWC 56th Street & Loop 101 – Phoenix, AZ
151 Planning & Development
Department
CITY OF PHOENIX
MAR 13 2025
Planning & Development
Department


TAB 2




'HVHUW5LGJH6SHFLILF3ODQ
3,11$&/(3($.5'
0 6

/ 0
/ / /
/
6 / /
/
 
/ 6 6
*& /
9$ '((5 6 
//( *&
<5 5
' 0 
5+ 6
/ /  0+ 6
6
0
+
 : 0
6 + /
0 3 +( + 0
+ 081

0 $
&
7+67 0

%
&3 /
&3 SITE +
0
3
, &3%3
6

&

Z
[ 3% 
&3%3
3 X
W
 0$<2%/9
'
7$780%/9' &3%3




k
 
7+67 7+67
0LOHV
0DULFRSD&RXQW\$VVHVVRU V2IILFH
6?,QIRUPDWLRQ6\VWHPV?*,6?3URMHFWV?'HVHUWB5LGJHB6SHFLILFB3ODQB%RXQGDU\?'HVHUWB5LGJHB6SHFLILFB3ODQB%RXQGDU\DSU[




'HVHUW5LGJH6SHFLILF 6XSHUEORFN1XPEHU
3ODQ 
  CITY OF PHOENIX
'HYHORSPHQW3DUFHO
  
6XSHUEORFN
MAR 13 2025
   Planning & Development &UHDWHG 
   Department 5HYLVHG
CITY OF PHOENIX
MAR 13 2025
Planning & Development
Department


TAB 3




CITY OF PHOENIX
MAR 13 2025
Planning & Development
Department




CITY OF PHOENIX
MAR 13 2025
Planning & Development
Department




CITY OF PHOENIX
MAR 13 2025
Planning & Development
Department




CITY OF PHOENIX
MAR 13 2025
Planning & Development
Department


TAB 4




CITY OF PHOENIX
MAR 13 2025
Planning & Development
Department









CITY OF PHOENIX
MAR 13 2025
Planning & Development
Department




CITY OF PHOENIX
MAR 13 2025
Planning & Development
Department

2024 CPSP - PARCEL G

ZT 56th Street at 101 NW Owner, LLC
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.




140'




(1) The
TheDesert
DesertRidge Specific
RidgeSpecific Plan
Plan allows
allows for up up to
forto 4,1634,163 dwelling
dwelling units units
within within Parcel
Parcel 5A
(1) The Desert Ridge Specific Plan allows for up to 4,163 dwelling units within Parcel 5A (see
(see5Aletter
(see 08/01/17
datedletter datedfrom the
08/01/17City of
fromPhoenix Snell
to of &Wilmer). The CPSP
Phoenix approved
&Wilmer). The on
CPSP 05/16/19
approved
letter dated 08/01/17 from the City
theofCity
Phoenix to Snellto Snell
&Wilmer). The CPSP approved on
allocated
on 05/16/193,500allocated units to
dwelling3,500 dwelling E1, E2, F1,
Parcels units F2, F3,
Parcels E1,G,E2,
H1,F1,
and H2F3,as reflected on Table
and H2 as1
05/16/19 allocated 3,500 dwelling units to to
Parcels E1, E2, F1, F2, F3,F2,
G, H1, G,andH1,H2 as reflected
therein.
reflected A totalTable welling units
of 663 therein. have
total not been
of 663 previously
dwelling units allocated.
have not The 2020
been CPSP allocated
previously
on Tableon 1 therein.1A total of A
663 dwelling units have not been previously allocated. The 2020
531 of these
allocated. Thepreviously
2020 unallocated
CPSP allocateddwelling
531 units
of to Parcels
these F1, F2, and
previously F3, and of
unallocated dwelling remaining
the units
CPSP allocated 531 of these previously unallocated dwelling units to Parcels F1, F2, and F3,to and
132 unallocated
Parcels residential units
F2, and ofthe
the2024 CPSP #1
remaining 132 allocated 118 residential
unallocated units
units Parcel
to the G
of the F1,
remaining 132F3, and
unallocated residential units this 2024 CPSP allocates
residential118 residential units
(Per City Council Report, item 68, dated 11/6/2019, and item __, dated __/__/____) leaving the remaining 14 residential units available to be allocated to Parcels H.1 and H.2 through
to
CPSP Parcel
#1 Gallocated residential
and 14 118 units to
residential Parcels
units H.1 and
to Parcel G and Up to a
H.2. 14 residential
total ofunits
4,031to welling
Parcelsunits
H.1
the CPSP approval process. Up to a total of 4,149 4,031 dwelling units may be constructed on Parcels
may
and H.2. constructed
be Up to a total
onofParcels
4,031 E1, E2, F1,
dwelling F2, F3,
units mayG,beH1 and H2 without
constructed on an amendment
Parcels E1, E2,toF1, this
E1, E2, F1, F2, F3, G, H1 and H2 without an amendment to this CPSP; but amendment to this
CPSP;
F2, butH1 amendment
anand H2 to his
without an CPSP is necessary
amendment construct
to thistoCPSP; but more than
an 4,031 dwelling
amendment this units
CPSP F3,isG,
necessary to construct more than 4,149
4,031 dwelling units on Parcels E1, E2, F1,toF2, F3, G,
on
CPSP arcels E1,
necessary F1, F2,
E2, to F3, G, H1
construct moreand than
H2.4,031 dwelling units on Parcels E1, E2, F1, F2,
H1 andis H2.
F3, G, H1 and H2.




These Maximum Building Height provisions do not apply to the parcels
marked “Not a Part” in the Building Height Exhibit above. Those 534
parcels remain subject to the provisions of Chapter 4, Section E.2.a.2
of the Desert Ridge Specific Plan which state that parcels within
Superblock 5.A. shall be subject to individual site plan review through
the Village Planning Committee, Planning Commission, and City
Council if the proposed building height exceeds four stories.




The 2023





4,149




ZT 56th Street at 101 NW Owner, LLC



CITY OF PHOENIX
MAR 13 2025
Planning & Development
Department




DESERT RIDGE
BUILDING HEIGHT EXHIBITS




ZOM - Desert Ridge
Phoenix, AZ | 01.21012.00 | 03.07.25
©2025 LRK Inc. All Rights Reserved.
PAGE 1




CITY OF PHOENIX
MAR 13 2025
Planning & Development
Department




ZOM - Desert Ridge
Phoenix, AZ | 01.21012.00 | 03.07.25
©2025 LRK Inc. All Rights Reserved.
PAGE 2




CITY OF PHOENIX
MAR 13 2025
Planning & Development
Department
Request Proposed Heights are Consistent with the Specific Plan and the Desert View Village Character Plan
To establish setbacks/stepbacks for buildings with heights greater than four-stories and up to 140’ in height (exclusive of \«®Ú
לÖäœÚá
ڜœ»Ú
áÈ
ÔÔ×È÷œ
‘䮽˜®Ã§
«œ®§«áÚ
Ȧ
ǸǻǷɵ
á«×È䧫Èäá
᫜
P גœ½
$
Ô×ȹœ’á
®Ã

ڮ罜
ÔÔ½®’ á®ÈÃɒ

\«®Ú
Ô×ÈÔÈÚ ½

×ÈÈĎÈÔ
œ’« î’ ½
Ø
ÔÔä×áœÃ Ҝ
ڒלœÃ®Ã§ɠ
½È’ ᜘
®Ã
᫜
ל Ú
˜œÔ®’᜘
®Ã
᫜
䮽˜®Ã§
(œ®§«á
®Ã
á«®Ú
˜È’äœÃáɒ

øÈ佘
œ½®Â®Ã áœ
᫜
ܜ˜
¦È×
Âä½á®Ô½œ
ל÷®œøÚ
áÈ
½½Èø
‘䮽˜®Ã§Ú
È÷œ×
¦Èä×
ÚáÈ×®œÚ
®Ã
᫜
¦äáäלɒ

\«œ
Ô×ÈÔÈڜ˜
«œ®§«áÚɌ
䮽˜®Ã§Ú
ø«®’«
’ÈæÈ×Â
áÈ
᫜
’×®áœ×®
«œ×œ®Ã
˜È
ÃÈá
ܜ˜
¦ä×᫜×
ל÷®œø
Ú
’ÈÃáœÂÔ½ ᜘
‘þ
« Ôáœ×
ǻ
Vœ’á®ÈÃ
ɒǹɒ ɒǹ
Ȧ

᫜
œÚœ×á
S®˜§œ
VԜ’®¦®’
P½ Ãɒ x ל
®Ã
’ÈæÈנҜ
ø®á«
᫜
œÚœ×á
S®˜§œ
VԜ’®¦®’
P½ Ã
x ½®§Ã
ø®á«
᫜
÷®Ú®ÈÃ
¦È×
᫜
œÚœ×á
S®˜§œ
j®½½ §œ
Èל
x ½®§Ã
ø®á«
᫜
ǹǷǸǼ
$œÃœ× ½
P½ Ã
x ½®§Ã
ø®á«
Ô׮Ò®Ô ½Ú
œÚá ‘½®Ú«œ˜
‘þ
᫜
ל Ú

Ø

$œÃœ× ½
P½ Ã
Introduction x k®½½
ÃÈá
®Ã’ל ڜ
˜œÃÚ®áþ
‘œþÈØ
ø« á
« Ú
½×œ ˜þ
‘œœÃ
ÔÔ×È÷œ˜
Ôל÷®ÈäÚ½þɒ
#È×
Ôä×ÔÈڜÚ
Ȧ
á«®Ú
לÖäœÚáɍ
P גœ½
$
ל¦œ×Ú
áÈ
ÔÔ×Èý®Â ᜽þ
ǹǷ
’לÚ
½È’ ᜘
®Ã
᫜
ÚÈä᫜ Úá
’È×Ü×
ÔÈ×á®ÈÃ
Ȧ
P גœ½
$

Ȧ
œÚœ×á
S®˜§œ
Ú
Ú«ÈøÃ
ÈÃ
᫜
䮽˜®Ã§
(œ®§«á
ý«®‘®á
®Ã
á«®Ú
˜È’äœÃáɒ

\«œ
P גœ½
$
®Ú
‘Èטœ×œ˜
‘þ
P גœ½
#ɒǺ
áÈ
᫜
øœÚáɍ

+\q
?DS\(
S+j
áÈ
᫜
ÃÈ×á«ɍ
?È×á«
Ǽǽth
Váלœá
áÈ
᫜
œ Úáɍ
Ø
᫜
×®ăÈÃ
Vá áœ
SÈäáœ
ǸǷǸ
áÈ
᫜
ÚÈäá«ɒ

P גœ½
$
®Ú
ăÈܘ

ɲ+Ãáœ×œ˜® áœ
ÈÂœג® ½ɳ
ɟɲɩǹɳɠ
®Ã
’’Èט Ҝ
ø®á«
᫜
œÚœ×á
S®˜§œ
VԜ’®¦®’
P½ Ã
Ø
᫜
P«ÈœÃ®ý
vÈîç
Dט®Ã Ҝɗ
®á

®Ú
®˜œÃᮦ®œ˜
Ú

P׮ ×þ
Èל
ל
Ø
> ¹È×
ÂÔ½ÈþœÃá
œÃáœ×
ø®á«®Ã
᫜
ǹǷǸǼ
®áþ
Ȧ
P«ÈœÃ®ý
$œÃœ× ½
P½ Ãɒ

\«œ
œÚœ×á

S®˜§œ
VԜ’®¦®’
P½ Ã
’ÈÂœÃáÚ
ÈÃ
᫜
j®½½ §œ
ÈלɌ
ɲ\«®Ú
®Ú
᫜
œÚœĐ
S®˜§œ
j®½½ §œ
Èל
Ø
᫜
¦È’äÚ
Ȧ
á«
œÃá®×œ
˜œ÷œ½ÈÔœÃáɒ
½Èç
ø®á«
 ¹È×
×œá ®½
äڜÚ
ø®½½
‘œ
Ú®§Ã®¦®’ Ãá

ÈČ®’œɘœÂÔ½ÈþœÃá
äڜÚ
Ú
øœ½½
Ú
לڮ˜œÃá® ½
äڜÚ
á
äב Ã
˜œÃڮᮜÚɒɳ


Desert Ridge Approval Process and Implementation
\«®Ú
לÖäœÚá
˜ÈœÚ
ÃÈá
’« çœ
᫜
œý®Úá®Ã§ɍ
ÔÔ×È÷œ˜
œÃá®á½œÂœÃáÚɒ

S ᫜×ɍ
®á
Ú®ÂÔ½þ
®˜œÃᮦ®œÚ
ÚԜ’®¦®’
ל Ú
ø«œ×œ
‘䮽˜®Ã§Ú

§×œ áœ×
á« Ã
¦Èä×ɩÚáÈ×®œÚ
Ø
äÔ
áÈ
ǸǻǷɵ
®Ã
«œ®§«á
ɟœý’½äÚ®÷œ
Ȧ
×ÈÈĎÈÔ
œ’« î’ ½
Ø
ÔÔä×áœÃ Ҝ
ڒלœÃ®Ã§ɠ
 þ
‘œ

½È’ ᜘ɒ

\«œ
«œ®§«á
®Ú
½×œ ˜þ
ÔÔ×È÷œ˜
ɨ
᫜
ÚȽœ
¦È’äÚ
Ȧ
á«®Ú
לÖäœÚá
®Ú
᫜
½È’ á®ÈÃ
Ȧ
᫜
«œ®§«áɒ

\«œ×œ
®Ú
ÃÈ
½®Â®á á®ÈÃ

ÈÃ
᫜
Ãä‘œ×
Ȧ
ÚáÈ×®œÚ
§×œ áœ×
á« Ã
¦Èä×
ÚáÈ×®œÚ
ÚÈ
½Èç
Ú
᫜
«œ®§«á
˜ÈœÚ
ÃÈá
œý’œœ˜
ǸǻǷɵɒ

\«®Ú
לÖäœÚá
˜ÈœÚ
ÃÈá
לÚä½á
®Ã

Ãþ
®Ã’ל ڜ
®Ã
᫜
#½ÈÈ×
ל
S á®ÈÃ
ɟ#Sɠ
Ȧ
ǷɒǽǼ
½×œ ˜þ
ÔÔ×È÷œ˜
‘þ
᫜
VԜ’®¦®’
P½ Ãɒ

9®»œø®Úœɍ
᫜
œý®Úá®Ã§
VԜ’®¦®’
P½ Ã

לÖä®×œÂœÃá
¦È×
ǹǷʡ
ÈԜÃ
ÚÔ ’œ
®Ú
ÃÈá
˜®Â®Ã®Ú«œ˜
‘þ
á«®Ú
לÖäœÚáɒ

« Ôáœ×
ǻ
Ȧ
᫜
œÚœ×á
P½ Ã
VԜ’®¦®’
P½ Ã
ÈäὮÜÚ
᫜

Ô×ȒœÚÚ
§È÷œ×îç
˜œ÷œ½ÈÔœÃá
ø®á«®Ã
œÚœ×á
S®˜§œɒ

« Ôáœ×
ǻɍ
Vœ’á®ÈÃ
ɒǹɒ ɒǹ
ɟÔ §œ
ǻɩȀɠ
ڜáÚ
¦È×á«
᫜
’×®áœ×®
¦È×
ÔÔ×È÷-
®Ã§
᫜
½È’ á®ÈÃ
Ȧ
‘䮽˜®Ã§Ú
ø®á«®Ã
Ô ×’œ½
$
ø«®’«
ל
«®§«œ×
á« Ã
¦Èä×
ÚáÈ×®œÚɒ

\«œ
j®½½ §œ
P½ Ãîç
È®á᜜ɍ
P½ Ãîç

È®ÚÚ®ÈÃ
Ø
®áþ
ÈäÒ®½
ל÷®œø
®Ú
ɲ½®Â®áœ˜
áÈ
’Èæ®×®ç
á« á
᫜
Ô×ÈÔÈڜ˜
Ô½ ÃÚ
ל
’ÈÃÚ®ÚáœÃá
ø®á«
Ø
œœá
᫜

®ÃáœÃá®ÈÃÚ
Ȧ
᫜
œÚœ×á
S®˜§œ
VԜ’®¦®’
P½ Ã
Ø
᫜
ל Ú

Ø

$œÃœ× ½
P½ Ãɒɳ


Areas C and D General Plan and Desert View Village Character Plan
\«œ
ל Ú

Ø

$œÃœ× ½
P½ Ã
’ÈÃáœÂÔ½ áœÚ
á« á
j®½½ §œ
ÈלÚ
ø®½½
‘œ
᫜
½È’ á®ÈÃ
Ȧ
᫜
á ½½œÚá
‘䮽˜®Ã§Úɒ

9®»œø®Úœɍ

᫜
œÚœ×á
j®œø
j®½½ §œ
« × ’áœ×
P½ Ãɍ
ø«®’«
®Ú
®Ã’½ä˜œ˜
®Ã
᫜
ǹǷǸǼ
®áþ
Ȧ
P«ÈœÃ®ý
$œÃœ× ½
P½ Ãɍ
’ÈÃáœÂÔ½ áœÚ
½È’ á®Ã§

ɲ½ Ø
äڜÚ
ø®á«
§×œ áœÚá
«œ®§«á
Ø
ÂÈÚá
®ÃáœÃڜ
äڜÚ
ø®á«®Ã
÷®½½ §œ
’ÈלÚɎɳ

\«œ
« × ’áœ×
P½ Ã
˜ÈœÚ
ÃÈá
œÃá®ÈÃ
ÚԜ’®¦®’

«œ®§«áÚ
®Ã
᫜
j®½½ §œ
Èל
‘äá
˜ÈœÚ
ל¦œ×
áÈ
᫜
œÚœ×á
S®˜§œ
VԜ’®¦®’
P½ Ãɒ




Desert Ridge Specific Plan Building Height Criteria
« Ôáœ×
ǽɍ
Vœ’á®ÈÃ
ɒǼɒɒǺ
ɟP §œ
ǽɩǻȀɠ
Ø
« Ôáœ×
ǻɍ
Vœ’á®ÈÃ
ɒǹɒ ɒǸ
ɟÔ §œ
ǻɩȀɠ
Ȧ
᫜
œÚœ×á
S®˜§œ
VԜ’®¦®’
P½ Ã
‘Èá«
Úá áœɌ

ɲ> ý®ÂäÂ
‘䮽˜®Ã§
«œ®§«á
Ú« ½½
ÃÈá
œý’œœ˜
ǸǻǷ
¦œœáɒ

\«œ
j®½½ §œ
Èל
‘䮽˜®Ã§Ú
ל
áÈ
‘œ
᫜
Èýþ
‘䮽˜®Ã§Ú
®Ã
᫜
œÚœĐ

S®˜§œ
VԜ’®¦®’
P½ Ã
ø«®’«
 þ
‘œ
®Ã
œý’œÚÚ
Ȧ
ǸǷǷ
¦œœá
ø®á«
᫜
œý’œÔá®ÈÃ
Ȧ
> þÈ
(ÈÚÔ®á ½
½È’ ᜘
®Ã
VäԜב½È’»
Ǻɳɒ


P×®È×
áÈ
ǹǷǷǾɍ
᫜
VԜ’®¦®’
P½ Ã
®Ã’½ä˜œ˜
È᫜×
’×®áœ×®
¦È×
‘䮽˜®Ã§Ú
‘È÷œ
¦Èä×
ÚáÈ×®œÚ
®Ã
᫜
j®½½ §œ
Èל
ɟœɒ§ɒɍ
ÃÈ
ÂÈל
á« Ã

Ǻǿ
¦½ÈÈ×Ú
‘È÷œ
᫜
¦Èä×á«
¦½ÈÈ×ɍ
ÃÈ
ÂÈל
á« Ã
Ǽ
œ®§«áɩ¦½ÈÈ×
‘䮽˜®Ã§Úɍ
ÃÈ
ÂÈל
á« Ã
Ȁ
Ú®ýɩ¦½ÈÈ×
‘䮽˜®Ã§Úɍ
Ø
ÚÔ ’®Ã§
ל-
Öä®×œÂœÃáÚɠɒ

\«Èڜ
’×®áœ×®
øœ×œ
לÂÈ÷œ˜
¦×ÈÂ
᫜
VԜ’®¦®’
P½ Ã
®Ã
ǹǷǷǾɒ

\«œ
ל÷®œø
‘þ
᫜
j®½½ §œ
P½ Ãîç
È®á᜜ɍ

P½ Ãîç
È®ÚÚ®ÈÃɍ
Ø
®áþ
ÈäÒ®½
« ˜
ÂÈל
®áœÂÚ
áÈ
’ÈÃÚ®˜œ×
ø«œÃ
᫜ڜ
’×®áœ×®
øœ×œ
Úᮽ½

Ô ×á
Ȧ
᫜
VԜ’®¦®’
P½ Ãɒ


PÈÚá
ǹǷǷǾɍ
᫜
ל÷®œø
®Ú
Â䒫
Ú®ÂÔ½œ×Ɍ
ל
᫜
«œ®§«áÚ
’ÈÃÚ®ÚáœÃá
ø®á«
᫜
VԜ’®¦®’
P½ Ã
Ø
᫜
ל Ú

Ø

$œÃœ× ½
P½ Ãɒ




ZOM - Desert Ridge
Phoenix, AZ | 01.21012.00 | 03.07.25 Design Narrative
©2025 LRK Inc. All Rights Reserved.
PAGE 3




CITY OF PHOENIX
MAR 13 2025
Planning & Development
Department




NOT TO SCALE




ZOM - Desert Ridge
Phoenix, AZ | 01.21012.00 | 03.07.25 Project Site
©2025 LRK Inc. All Rights Reserved.
PAGE 4




CITY OF PHOENIX
MAR 13 2025
Planning & Development
Department




ZOM - Desert Ridge
Phoenix, AZ | 01.21012.00 | 03.07.25 Building Setback and Height Exhibit
©2025 LRK Inc. All Rights Reserved.
P$
Ǽ




CITY OF PHOENIX
MAR 13 2025
Planning & Development
Department




ZOM - Desert Ridge
Phoenix, AZ | 01.21012.00 | 03.07.25 Aerial View - Proposed Height Request
©2025 LRK Inc. All Rights Reserved.
P$
ǽ




CITY OF PHOENIX
MAR 13 2025
Planning & Development
Department




ZOM - Desert Ridge
Phoenix, AZ | 01.21012.00 | 03.07.25 Rendering - Proposed Height Request
©2025 LRK Inc. All Rights Reserved.
PAGE 7




CITY OF PHOENIX
MAR 13 2025
Planning & Development
Department




ZOM - Desert Ridge
Phoenix, AZ | 01.21012.00 | 03.07.25
Aerial View - Current Proposed Plan
©2025 LRK Inc. All Rights Reserved.
PAGE 8




CITY OF PHOENIX
MAR 13 2025
Planning & Development
Department




ZOM - Desert Ridge
Phoenix, AZ | 01.21012.00 | 03.07.25
Rendering - Current Proposed Plan
©2025 LRK Inc. All Rights Reserved.
P$
Ȁ







Report

Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-162-24-8 -
Approximately 230 Feet East of the Southeast Corner of 7th Street and Elwood
Street (Ordinance G-7382) - District 8

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
R-4 RSIOD (Multifamily Residence District, Rio Salado Interim Overlay District) and C-
3 RSIOD (General Commercial, Rio Salado Interim Overlay District) to C-3 RSIOD
(General Commercial, Rio Salado Interim Overlay District) for fabrication, office and
warehouse.

Summary
Current Zoning: R-4 RSIOD (2.89 acres) and C-3 RSIOD (0.49 acres)
Proposed Zoning: C-3 RSIOD
Acreage: 3.38
Proposal: Fabrication, office and warehouse

Owner: 749E LLC and MKRK Investments, LLC c/o Mike Kern
Applicant/Representative: Mario Mangiamele, Iplan Consulting Corporation

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The South Mountain Village Planning Committee heard this item on March
11, 2025, and recommended denial, by a vote of 15-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on April 3, 2025, and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 6-1-1.

Location
Approximately 230 feet east of the southeast corner of 7th Street and Elwood Street
Council District: 8
Parcel Address: 749 E. Elwood Street

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.



ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-162-24-8) FROM R-4 RSIOD (MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT, RIO SALADO INTERIM OVERLAY
DISTRICT) AND C-3 RSIOD (GENERAL COMMERCIAL, RIO
SALADO INTERIM OVERLAY DISTRICT) TO C-3 RSIOD
(GENERAL COMMERCIAL, RIO SALADO INTERIM OVERLAY
DISTRICT).
____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 3.38-acre site located approximately 230 feet

east of the southeast corner of 7th Street and Elwood Street in a portion of Section 21,

Township 1 North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby

changed from 2.89 acres of “R-4 RSIOD” (Multifamily Residence District, Rio Salado

Interim Overlay District) and 0.49 acres of “C-3 RSIOD” (General Commercial, Rio

Salado Interim Overlay District) to “C-3 RSIOD” (General Commercial, Rio Salado

Interim Overlay District).




SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan and
elevations date stamped February 14, 2025, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

2. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

3. Four bicycle spaces shall be provided on the site through Inverted U and/or
artistic racks located near the building entrances or in a secure location inside
the building and installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H. of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

4. Bicycle parking spaces and pedestrian walkways, including sidewalks, shall be
shaded by a structure, landscaping, or a combination of the two to provide a
minimum of 75% shade, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

5. A minimum 6-foot landscape setback shall be provided along the west
perimeter of the site, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

6. A minimum 10-foot landscape setback shall be provided along the south
perimeter of the site, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

7. The landscape setbacks along the east, south, and west portions of the site
shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper trees, planted 20 feet on center,
or in equivalent groupings, with five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the




developer shall work with the Planning and Development Department on
alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian environment for
installing the required plants.

8. A minimum of 2% of the required vehicle parking spaces shall include EV
Capable infrastructure.

9. The landscape setback along Elwood Street shall be planted to include native
cacti or similar spiny desert accent plants, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

10. Site lighting shall be provided at building entrances/exits and in public
assembly and parking areas, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

11. A minimum of 25% of the surface parking areas shall be shaded, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department. Shade may be achieved by
structures or by minimum 2-inch caliper, shade trees, or a combination thereof.

12. Natural turf shall only be utilized for required retention areas (bottom of basin,
and only allowed on slopes if required for slope stabilization) and functional turf
areas, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

13. A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for
stormwater management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This
includes but is not limited to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales,
permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure
and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater Management.

14. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the Water Efficiency Checkup
program for a minimum of 10 years, or as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

15. The sidewalk along Elwood Street shall be a minimum of 6 feet in width and
detached with a minimum 8-foot-wide landscape strip located between the
sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following standards, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees planted
20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings.

b. Shrubs, accents and vegetative groundcovers with a maximum mature
height of two feet evenly distributed throughout the landscape area to
achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage.




Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment for installing the required plants.

16. A minimum 40 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for the
south side of Elwood Street.

17. All mitigation improvements shall be constructed and/or funded as identified in
the accepted Traffic Impact Analysis dated January 15, 2025, including the
proportional contribution of $80,000 to the Street Transportation Department
prior to Final Site Plan approval for the future signalized intersection at 7th
Street and Elwood Street.

18. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

19. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

20. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

21. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

22. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the




decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 7th day of May, 2025.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (2 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-162-24-8

A portion of Lot 53, Lot 60 and Lot 61 of MONTE VISTA ACRES PLAT A, according to
the plat of record in the office of the County Recorder of Maricopa County, Arizona,
recorded in Book 22 of Maps, Page 36, being located in a portion of the Southwest
quarter of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 3 East of the Gila and Salt Rive Base
and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona and also being APN 113-18-027H according to
the Maricopa County Assessor, Arizona and being more particularly described as
follows:
COMMENCING at the intersection of 7th Street and Elwood Street, monumented with a
brass cap flush, which bears North 00 degrees 11 minutes 00 seconds West 1094.27
feet from the intersection of 7th Street and Jones Street, monumented with a brass cap
flush, as shown on the RECORD OF SURVEY recorded in Book 1184 of Maps, Page
10, records of Maricopa County, Arizona;
Thence along the monument line of Elwood Street as shown on said RECORD OF
SURVEY, South 89 degrees 42 minutes 54 seconds East 260.06 feet to the point of
curvature of a curve to the left, having a radius of 730.00 feet and monumented with a
brass cap flush;
Thence along said curve to the left through a central angle of 00 degrees 39 minutes 20
seconds an arc distance of 8.35 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence continuing along said curve to the left, through a central angle of 19 degrees 19
minutes 41 seconds an arc distance of 246.26 feet to a point for tangency and
monumented with a brass cap flush;
Thence North 70 degrees 18 minutes 08 seconds East a distance of 168.26 feet to a
point in the east line of Lot 61 as shown on the Monte Vista Acres Plat ‘A’ subdivision,
recorded in Book 22 of Maps, Page 35, Records of Maricopa County, Arizona;
Thence departing the monument line of Elwood Street along said east line of Lot 61,
South 00 degrees 08 minutes 56 seconds East a distance of 44.57 feet and
monumented with an iron rod with cap labeled “GOETZ” in the South right of way line of
Elwood Street;
Thence continuing along said east line of Lot 61 and also Lot 60 and Lot 53, South
00degrees 08 minutes 56 seconds East a distance 386.72 feet to the southeast corner
of lot 53;
Thence North 89 degrees 45 minutes 42 seconds West along the south line of said Lot
53 a distance of 400.01 feet to the southwest corner of Lot 53 and monumented with an
iron rod;




Thence along the west line of said Lot 53 and Lot 60, North 00 degrees 08 minutes 56
seconds West a distance of 288.20 feet and monumented with an iron rod with cap
labeled “Goetz” in the South right of way line of Elwood Street;
Thence North 00 degrees 08 minutes 56 seconds a distance of 42.00 feet to the POINT
OF BEGINNING.
Containing an area of 147,106 square feet or 3.377 acres, more or less.







Report

***REQUEST TO WITHDRAW (SEE ATTACHED MEMO)*** (CONTINUED FROM
APRIL 23, 2025) - Public Hearing and Formal Action - Planning Hearing Officer
Application - PHO-2-25--Z-174-87-2(1) - Southwest Corner of 27th Avenue and
Deer Valley Road - District 1

Request to hold a public hearing and consider the Planning Hearing Officer's
recommendation by the City Council on matters heard by the Planning Hearing Officer
on February 19, 2025.

Summary
Application: PHO-2-25--Z-174-87-2(1)
Existing Zoning: C-1 DVAO
Acreage: 9.98

Owner: QuikTrip Corporation
Applicant/Representative: Lauren Proper Potter, Huellmantel & Affiliates

Proposal:
1. Request to modify Stipulation 1 regarding general conformance to the site plan
presented.
2. Request to delete Stipulation 9 regarding design standards of the C-1 parcel.

VPC Action: The Deer Valley Village Planning Committee opted not to hear this case.
PHO Action: The Planning Hearing Officer recommended approval with a modification
and an additional stipulation.

Location
Southwest corner of 27th Avenue and Deer Valley Road
Council District: 1
Parcel Address: 2725 W. Deer Valley Road

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.



ATTACHMENT A - Stipulations – PHO-2-25—Z-174-87-2(1)

Location: Southwest corner of 27th Avenue and Deer Valley Road

STIPULATIONS:

1. That THE development SHALL be in general conformance to the site plan
DATE STAMPED NOVEMBER 15, 2024, AS MODIFIED BY THE
FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT presented with appropriate
modifications as may be necessary due to drainage and circulation needs.

2.

T
That Residential densities SHALL not exceed the following limits:

a. R1-6 – maximum 4.0 dwelling units per acre.




3.


4.
AF
b.

c.

d.
R-2 – maximum 8.0 dwelling units per acre.

R-3 – maximum 12.0 dwelling units per acre.

R-3A – maximum 22.0 dwelling units per acre.

That Each development be subject to Development Coordination office
review and approval in accord with Section 511 of the Zoning Ordinance.

That A master grading and drainage plan for Parcels 1, 2, and 3 SHALL
be submitted to the Development Coordination Office for review and
approval concurrent with or prior to Phase I development. A master
grading and drainage plan for Parcels 4 and 5 shall be submitted to the




R
5.
Development Coordination Office for review and approval concurrent with
or prior to Phase II development. Each phase shall be in accord with the
approved plan.

That The Scatter Wash Floodway SHALL be preserved and enhanced in a
natural desert state concurrent with Phase I development.




D
6.


7.
That The rechannelization of the East Scatter Wash SHALL reflect a
natural desert design.

That ALL hiking and riding trails SHALL be dedicated within the Scatter
Wash and be submitted to the Development Coordination Office for review
and approval concurrent with or prior to Phase I development. Additional
trails shall be provided throughout the site for the use of the residents and
shall tie residential open space areas to the wash, apartments, and
commercial areas.




8. That The residential development adjacent to the Scatter Wash SHALL be
designed with front or side on treatment.

9. That the C-1 parcel be subject to the following design standards:

a. Maximum of one detached pad architecturally integrated with the
entire center design.

b. Maximum Floor Area Ratio not to exceed .2.

c.

d.
T
Maximum one-story, 25 feet building height.

Minimum 20-foot landscape setbacks together with screening
walls/berms or a combination thereof be provided adjacent to
perimeter streets.




9.
10.




10.
AF
e. Minimum 24-inch box size shade trees be provided a maximum of 20
feet on center or placed in equivalent groupings adjacent to perimeter
streets with minimum 15 gallon size shade trees spaced a maximum
of 20 feet on center around the remainder of the site.

That 31st Avenue SHALL be fully improved between Rose Garden Land
and the northern boundary of Parcels 1 and 2 as to the 60-foot full street
and between the northern boundary of Parcels 1 and 2 and Deer Valley
Drive as to the 30-foot half street on the east side concurrent with or prior
to Phase II development.

That The following rights-of-way SHALL be dedicated within one year of




R
11. the auction of the adjoining parcel(s) by the State:

a.

b.
40-foot half street right-of-way for the west side of 27th Avenue.

55-foot half street right-of-way for the south side of Deer Valley
Drive.




D c.


d.

e.


f.
30-foot half street right-of-way for the north side of Rose Garden
Lane.

25-foot half street right-of-way for the east side of 33rd Avenue.

60-foot full street right-of-way for 31st Avenue with a 30-foot half
street right-of-way on the north half of the site.

14’x14’ triangle at the intersection of 31st Avenue and Rose Garden




Lane.

g. 18’x18’ triangle at the intersection of 31st Avenue and Deer Valley
Drive.

h. 21’x21’ triangle at the intersection of Deer Valley Drive and 27th
Avenue.

i. Additional right-of-way including bus bays and right turn lanes as
determined at the time of Development Coordination Office review.

11.


T
THE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE DEDICATED AND A BUS BAY (DETAIL
#P-1256) CONSTRUCTED ON 27TH AVENUE AS APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.




AF
R
D
To: Alan Stephenson Date: May 2, 2025
Deputy City Manager

From: Joshua Bednarek
Planning and Development Director

Subject: WITHDRAWAL OF ITEM 59 ON THE MAY 7, 2025, FORMAL AGENDA –
PLANNING HEARING OFFICER ACTION - PHO-2-25--Z-174-87-2(1) -
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 27TH AVENUE AND DEER VALLEY ROAD

Item 59, Planning Hearing Officer Application - PHO-2-25--Z-174-87-2(1). This is a
request to modify Stipulation 1 regarding general conformance to the site plan presented
and to delete Stipulation 9 regarding design standards of the C-1 parcel for a 9.98-acre
site located at southwest corner of 27th Avenue and Deer Valley Road for a proposed
new service station and store.

The applicant has requested to withdraw the request and will no longer pursue a
modification of the site. Attached is a copy of the applicant’s withdrawal request.


Approved: ______________________________________
Alan Stephenson, Deputy City Manager



*Attachment – email from applicant dated May 2, 2025




From: Lauren Proper Potter
To: Tricia Gomes
Subject: PHO-2-25-Z-174-87-2 - Withdrawal Request
Date: Friday, May 2, 2025 2:37:31 PM
Attachments: image001.png




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.

Report Suspicious     ‌


Hello Deputy Director Gomes,

Please consider this formal request to withdraw our case current set for the May 7th, 2025,
agenda. We are withdrawing for the purpose of making some site plan modifications in
conjunction with the Vice Mayor’s office and plan to refile a modified request in the future.

Please feel free to reach out with any questions. Thank you.

Best regards,

Lauren Proper Potter







Report

Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-164-24-3 - Southwest Corner of Cave Creek
Road and Peoria Avenue (Ordinance G-7387) - District 3

Request to hold a public hearing and amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section
601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-164-
24-3 and rezone the site from C-2 (Intermediate Commercial District) to R-5
(Multifamily Residence District - Restricted Commercial) to allow multifamily
residential.

Summary
Current Zoning: C-2
Proposed Zoning: R-5
Acreage: 2.18 acres
Proposal: Multifamily residential

Owner: Valle Point, LLC
Applicant: Allante Properties, LLC
Representative: Alan Beaudoin, Norris Design, Inc.

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The North Mountain Village Planning Committee heard this item on
February 19, 2025 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation with
direction, by a vote of 13-0-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on March 6, 2025 and
recommended approval, per the North Mountain Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.
CC Action: For City Council action, the item was scheduled for the April 9, 2025 Formal
Meeting and was withdrawn to consider modifications and re-advertised for a public
hearing on May 7, 2025.

Location
Southwest corner of Cave Creek Road and Peoria Avenue
Council District: 3




Parcel Address: 1313, 1355, 1363 E. Peoria Avenue; and 10440 and 10444 N. Cave
Creek Road

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-164-24-3) FROM C-2 (INTERMEDIATE
COMMERCIAL) TO R-5 (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT –
RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 2.18-acre site located at the southwest

corner of Cave Creek Road and Peoria Avenue in a portion of Section 28, Township 3

North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed

from “C-2” (Intermediate Commercial) to “R-5” (Multifamily Residence District –

Restricted Commercial).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,




violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. All building elevations shall contain architectural embellishments and detailing
such as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, variation in window size
and location, and/or overhang canopies, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

2. All landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, large
canopy, shade trees planted 20 feet on center, or equivalent groupings, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

3. Where pedestrian pathways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

4. A minimum 30 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for the
south half of Peoria Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

5. A minimum 6-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum 5-foot-wide
landscape area shall be constructed on the south side of Peoria Avenue and
planted to the following standards, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department:

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees planted
20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment for installing the required plants.

6. A minimum of 50 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for the
west half of Cave Creek Road, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

7. A minimum 6-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum 10-foot-
wide landscape area shall be constructed on the west side of Cave Creek Road
and planted to the following standards, as approved or modified by the Planning
and Development Department:

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees planted




20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment for installing the required plants.

8. All mitigation improvements shall be constructed and/or funded as identified in
the accepted Traffic Impact Analysis dated January 29, 2025.

9. Replace unused driveways with sidewalk, curb, and gutter. Also, replace any
broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on all streets and
upgrade all off-site improvements to be in compliance with current ADA
guidelines.

10. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

11. A bus bay and pad along Cave Creek Road shall be constructed per the
requirements of City of Phoenix Standard Details P1256, P1258, and P1262, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. The entirety of the
facility shall be placed within the public right-of-way or an easement. Additional
right-of-way dedication may be necessary as required by the Planning and
Development Department.

12. A minimum of 2% of the required parking spaces shall include Electric Vehicle
(EV) Installed infrastructure. A minimum of 8% of the required parking spaces
shall include EV Capable infrastructure.

13. The development shall incorporate bicycle infrastructure as described below
and as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. The developer shall provide secure bicycle parking per Section 1307 of
the Zoning Ordinance.

b. Guest bicycle parking shall be provided at a minimum rate of 0.05 space
per dwelling unit, up to a maximum of 50 spaces.

c. A minimum of 10 percent of the provided bicycle parking spaces shall
include standard electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging
capabilities.




d. A bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided and maintained
on site within an amenity area or near a primary site entrance. The bicycle
repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided in an area of high visibility
and separated from vehicular maneuvering areas, where applicable. The
repair station shall include, but not be limited to:

i. Standard repair tools affixed to the station;

ii. A tire gauge and pump affixed to the base of the station or the
ground;

iii. A bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin freely
while making adjustments to the bike.

14. All bicycle infrastructure, pedestrian pathways (including sidewalks), and transit
stops shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping, or a combination of the two
to provide a minimum of 75% shade, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

15. Natural turf shall only be utilized for required retention areas (bottom of basin,
and only allowed on slopes if required for slope stabilization) and functional turf
areas, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

16. Pressure regulating sprinkler heads and/or drip lines shall be utilized in any turf
areas to reduce water waste.

17. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the Water Efficiency Program for a
minimum of ten years, or as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

18. A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for
stormwater management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This
includes but is not limited to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales,
permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure
and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater Management.

19. A minimum of 25% of the surface parking areas shall be shaded, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department. Shade may be achieved by
structures or by minimum 2-inch caliper, drought tolerant, shade trees, or a
combination thereof.

20. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the




Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

21. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 7th day of May, 2025.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-164-24-3

A PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,
RANGE 3 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, FROM WHICH THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF SAID SECTION BEARS SOUTH 89°52'09" EAST, A DISTANCE OF
1202.10 FEET;

THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SECTION 28, SOUTH 89°52'09" EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 118.70 FEET, TO A BRASS CAP IN HANDHOLE MARKING THE
INTERSECTION OF PEORIA AVENUE AND CAVE CREEK ROAD;

THENCE LEAVING SECTION LINE, ALONG THE MONUMENT LINE OF CAVE
CREEK ROAD, SOUTH 32°30'54" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 348.62 FEET;

THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID MONUMENT LINE, BEING A TANGENT
CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1300.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE
OF 02°12'30", A TANGENT LENGTH OF 25.06 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH
BEARS SOUTH 31°40'20" WEST, A CHORD DISTANCE OF 50.10 FEET, FOR AN
ARC LENGTH OF 50.10 FEET;

THENCE LEAVING SAID MONUMENT LINE, NORTH 89°45'30" WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 281.18 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 30°42'38" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 203.15 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 32°42'53" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 191.86 FEET, TO A POINT THE
NORTH LINE OF SECTION 28;

THENCE SOUTH 89°52'09" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 168.73 FEET, TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
CONTAINING 96,366 SQ.FT., 2.212 ACRES (MORE OR LESS)




ATTACHMENT B




Staff Report: Z-164-24-3
February 12, 2025

North Mountain Village Planning February 19, 2025
Committee Meeting Date:

Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 6, 2025

Request From: C-2 (Intermediate Commercial)
(2.18 acres)
Request To: R-5 (Multifamily Residence District –
Restricted Commercial) (2.18 acres)
Proposal: Multifamily residential
Location: Southwest corner of Cave Creek Road
and Peoria Avenue
Owner: Valle Point, LLC
Applicant: Allante Properties
Representative: Alan Beaudoin, Norris Design
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations

General Plan Conformity
General Plan Land Use Designation Commercial
Cave Creek Major Arterial42-foot west half
Street Map Classification Road street
0 to 22-foot south
Peoria Avenue Minor Collector
half street
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; DIVERSE NEIGHBORHOOD; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Include a mix of
housing types and densities where appropriate within each village that support
a broad range of lifestyles.

The proposal is compatible with surrounding land uses and zoning designations, and
will add to the mix of housing types within the area.

BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREE AND SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new
development and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.




Staff Report: Z-164-24-3
February 12, 2025


The proposal, as stipulated, provides enhanced shading and planting standards for
pedestrian pathways, bicycle parking areas and bus stops.

CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; PUBLIC TRANSIT; LAND USE
PRINCIPLE: Continue to require installation of bus bays at appropriate
locations, continue to reserve and require easements or right of ways for bus
shelters.

As stipulated, the proposal will include the installation of a new bus bay and bus pad
adjacent to the site.



Applicable Plan, Overlays, and Initiatives

Target Area F Redevelopment Plan: Background Item No. 7.

Housing Phoenix Plan: Background Item No. 8.

Complete Streets Guiding Principles: Background Item No. 9.

Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan: Background Item No. 10.

Tree and Shade Master Plan: Background Item No. 11.

Transportation Electrification Action Plan: Background Item No. 12.

Conservation Measures for New Development: Background Item No. 13.

Phoenix Climate Action Plan: Background Item No. 14.



Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning
Land Use Zoning
On Site Vacant C-2
North (across
Single-family residential and restaurant R-5, C-2
Peoria Avenue)
South Multifamily residential R-3A PCD
East (across Cave
Commercial uses C-2
Creek Road)
West Vacant (proposed multifamily residential) R-5




Staff Report: Z-164-24-3
February 12, 2025


R-5 Multifamily Residence District
(Planned Residential Development Option)
Standards Requirements Site Plan Provisions
2.18 acres - Rezone Area
Gross Acres -
5.20 acres - Project Area
Rezone area - 99, 114 with
Maximum Dwelling bonus Rezone area - Unspecified
Units Project area - 237, 271 Project Area - 240 (Met)
with bonus
Maximum Density Rezone Area - Unspecified
45.68, 52.20 with bonus
(dwelling units/acre) Project Area - 46.15 (Met)
4 stories or 48 feet; 15 feet
within 10 feet of a single-
family zoning district,1-foot
Maximum Building
increase in height for every 4 stories and 48 feet (Met)
Height
additional 1-foot of building
setback to the maximum
permitted height
Minimum Perimeter Building Setbacks
Peoria Avenue: 20 feet (Met)
Adjacent to a Street 20 feet
Cave Creek Road: 20 feet (Met)
South: Not depicted,
approximately 45 feet (Met)
Adjacent to a
15 feet
Property Line
West: Not depicted,
approximately 30 feet (Met)
Minimum Landscape Setbacks
Peoria Avenue: 20 feet (Met)
(*Parking spaces not permitted
Adjacent to a Street 20 feet in landscape setback)

Cave Creek Road: 20 feet (Met)
South: 7 feet (Met)
Adjacent to a
5 feet
Property Line West: Not depicted,
approximately 5 feet (Met)
Lot Standards
Minimum Common
5 percent 10 percent (Met)
Area / Open Space
Maximum Lot
50 percent 49 percent (Met)
Coverage




Staff Report: Z-164-24-3
February 12, 2025


360 spaces, 1.5 spaces
Minimum Parking 373 spaces (Met)
per dwelling unit

Background/Issues/Analysis

SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone 2.18 acres located at the southwest corner of Cave
Creek Road and Peoria Avenue from C-2 (Intermediate Commercial) to R-5
(Multifamily Residence District - Restricted Commercial) for multifamily
residential. The subject site is proposed to be developed in combination with the
area to the west for one multifamily residential building and associated parking
structure.

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION
2. The subject site, as well as areas to the north, east and south are designated as
Commercial on the General Plan Land Use Map. To west is designated as
Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre. To the north is designated
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Commercial. The proposal for R-
5 zoning is not consistent with the General Plan Land Use; however, a General
Plan Amendment is not required as the site is less than 10 acres.




General Plan Land Use Map; Source: City of Phoenix GIS with annotations by staff




Staff Report: Z-164-24-3
February 12, 2025



SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
3. To the east, across Cave Creek Road, are commercial uses zoned C-2. To the
north, across Peoria Avenue, is a restaurant zoned C-2 and single-family
residences zoned R-5. To the south is multifamily residential zoned R-3 PCD
(Multifamily Residential District, Planned Community District). To the west is
vacant land that is part of the project area, and zoned R-5.

4. The following image illustrates the subject site and its proximity to the adjacent
properties and zoning.




Source: City of Phoenix GIS

PROPOSAL
5. Site Plan
The site plan, attached as an exhibit, depicts a 240-unit apartment building. The
building and its appurtenances will span the larger approximately five-acre site as
outlined in white below; however, the area included in the subject rezone request
is outlined in red and is only approximately two acres of the larger 5-acre site.




Staff Report: Z-164-24-3
February 12, 2025




Source: Norris Design with annotations by staff

Parking will consist of 360 vehicular spaces, mostly located within the
internalized parking structure, with 22 spaces and one loading zone located on
the surface lot.

Primary access to the larger site will be from Peoria Avenue, which will lead to a
small parking area and ultimately an access gate that leads to additional surface
parking, loading zone, and second gate with ultimate access to Cave Creek
Road. Access to the parking garage will occur at a dedicated entrance from
Peoria Avenue and along the south side of the building via the aforementioned
private drive.

Amenities will include an internalized courtyard with pool, cabanas, BBQ area
and landscape areas. Located in the southwest corner of the larger site within the
gated area will be a dog park.

6. Elevations
The elevations, attached as an exhibit, depict a four-story building with a
maximum height of 48 feet. The exterior materials are shown as stucco, masonry
tile, and block but are otherwise undefined, while the parking spaces within the
integrated parking garage are shown to be screened but are also otherwise
undefined.




Staff Report: Z-164-24-3
February 12, 2025




Source: Kephart

ADOPTED AREA PLANS, STUDIES, AND POLICIES
7. Target Area F Redevelopment Plan:
Adopted January 1980 and amended February 1981 (Resolution No. 15576), the
Target Area F Redevelopment Plan encompasses approximately 800 acres of
the Sunnyslope area. The following map, taken from the Plan, includes what was
then a forward-looking Land Use Plan, which shows the subject site as being
designated as Community Commercial and adjacent to an area designated as
High-Density Multi-Family.




Staff Report: Z-164-24-3
February 12, 2025




Source: Target Area F Redevelopment Plan with annotations by staff

While the Target Area F’s Land Use Plan designates the site as Community
Commercial, which would suggest the proposed rezone does not advance the
goals and policies of the Plan, Section III of the Target Area F Redevelopment
Plan also includes several Objectives, which include but are not limited to the
following:

1. Ensure the stability of existing viable residential areas and stabilize declining
residential neighborhoods by removing structurally substandard buildings and
blighting influences which act as a disincentive for private reinvestment.

3. Removal of impediments to land disposition and development through
assembly of land into reasonably sized and shaped parcels served by
improved public utilities.

5. Ensure the establishment of appropriate population densities and
concentrations that will contribute to the well-being of persons, neighborhoods
and preservation of the environment.




Staff Report: Z-164-24-3
February 12, 2025


9. Create a sense of community and neighborhood throughout the Target Area in
order to enhance its attractiveness as a place to live, work, and play.

The larger five-acre multifamily development that is associated with the proposed
rezone acts to redevelop the site in a manner that advances these objectives.

8. Housing Phoenix Plan:
In June 2020, the Phoenix City Council approved the Housing Phoenix Plan. This
Plan contains policy initiatives for the development and preservation of housing
with a vision of creating a stronger and more vibrant Phoenix through increased
housing options for residents at all income levels and family sizes. Phoenix’s
rapid population growth and housing underproduction has led to a need for over
163,000 new housing units. Current shortages of housing supply relative to
demand are a primary reason why housing costs are increasing. The proposed
development supports the Plan’s goal of preserving or creating 50,000 housing
units by 2030 by contributing to a variety of housing types that will address the
supply shortage at a more rapid pace while using vacant land in a more
sustainable fashion.

9. Complete Streets Guiding Principles:
The City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding
Principles. The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an
accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such as
bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. The proposed development, as
stipulated, will support walking, bicycling, and transit use by including the
following:

• Contrasting pavement for pedestrian crossings;
• Shaded, detached sidewalks along Peoria Avenue and Cave Creek Road;
• Bus bay and bus pad adjacent to the site;
• Bicycle infrastructure including guest bicycle parking, electrical charging
stations, and fix-it station;
• Shaded bicycle, pedestrian, and transit infrastructure.

These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, and 14.

10. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
The City of Phoenix adopted the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan in 2014 to
guide the development of its Bikeway System and supportive infrastructure. The
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan supports options for both short- and long-
term bicycle parking as a means of promoting bicyclist traffic to a variety of
destinations. Stipulation No.13 requires bicycle parking with supporting




Staff Report: Z-164-24-3
February 12, 2025


equipment, all to be installed per the requirements in the city’s Walkable Urban
(WU) Code.

11. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan has a goal of treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure that trees are an integral part of the city’s planning and
development process. By investing in trees and the urban forest, the city can
reduce its carbon footprint, decrease energy costs, reduce storm water runoff,
increase biodiversity, address the urban heat island effect, clean the air, and
increase property values. In addition, trees can help to create walkable streets
and vibrant pedestrian places. Staff recommends robust tree planting standards
including:

• Landscape setbacks to be planted with 2-inch caliper shade trees at 20-feet
on center;
• The use of 2-inch caliper trees to achieve 75% shade for all detached
sidewalks;
• The use of shade structure, trees, or landscaping to achieve 75% shade at
bicycle, pedestrian, and transit infrastructure;
• Vegetating the surface parking lot with minimum 2-inch caliper trees to
achieve a minimum of 25 percent shade.

These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 2, 5, 7, 14, and 19.

12. Transportation Electrification Action Plan
In June 2022, the Phoenix City Council approved the Transportation
Electrification Action Plan. The current market desire for the electrification of
transportation is both a national and global phenomenon, fueled by a desire for
better air quality, a reduction in carbon emissions, and a reduction in vehicle
operating and maintenance costs. Businesses, governments and the public are
signaling strong future demand for electric vehicles (EVs), and many automobile
manufacturers have declared plans for a transition to fully electric offerings within
the coming decade. This Plan contains policy initiatives to prepare the City for a
future filled with more EVs, charging infrastructure and e-mobility equity, and
outlines a roadmap for a five-step plan to prepare for the EV infrastructure needs
of 280,000 EVs in Phoenix by 2030. One goal of the Plan, to accelerate public
adoption of electric vehicles through workplace, business, and multifamily
charging infrastructure, is to recommend a standard stipulation for rezoning
cases to provide EV charging infrastructure. This is addressed in Stipulation No.
12. Additionally, electric receptacles are required for electric bicycle charging per
Stipulation No. 13.c.




Staff Report: Z-164-24-3
February 12, 2025


13. Conservation Measures for New Development:
In June 2023, the Phoenix City Council adopted the Conservation Measures for
New Development policy as part of a resolution addressing the future water
consumption of new development (Resolution 22129). This resolution addresses
the future water consumption of new development to support one of the City’s
Five Core Values in the General Plan which calls for Phoenix to - Build the
Sustainable Desert City. The Conservation Measures for New Development
policy includes direction to develop standards for consideration as stipulations for
all rezoning cases that will address best practices related to water usage in nine
specific categories. This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 15 through 19.

14. Phoenix Climate Action Plan:
In October 2021, the Phoenix City Council approved the Climate Action Plan.
The Climate Action Plan will serve as a long-term plan to achieve greenhouse
gas emission reductions and resiliency goals from local operations
and community activities as well as prepare for the impacts of climate change.
This plan contains policy and initiatives regarding stationary energy,
transportation, waste management, air quality, local food systems, heat, and
water. Goal W2 (Water), Action W2.4, pertains to the implementation of the
Greater Phoenix Green Infrastructure (GI) and Low Impact Development Details
for Alternative Stormwater Management to benefit the environment, promote
water conservation, reduce urban heat, improve the public health, and create
additional green spaces. This goal is addressed in Stipulation No. 18, which
requires a minimum of two GI techniques for stormwater management to be
implemented.

COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
15. As of the writing of this report, no community correspondence has been received.

INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
16. The Street Transportation Department requires sufficient right-of-way dedication
to bring the half-width for Peoria Avenue to 30 feet adjacent to the site, and a
right-of-way dedication along Cave Creek Road to bring the half-width to 50 feet
adjacent to the site. Improvements will include curb, gutter, detached sidewalk,
and landscaping as outlined in Stipulations No. 4 through No. 10.

17. The Public Transit Department requested a bus bay, bus stop pad and if
necessary, additional dedication of right-of-way along Cave Creek Road.
This is addressed in Stipulation No. 11.

OTHER
18. The site has not been identified as being archaeologically sensitive. However, in
the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, all
ground disturbing activities must cease within 33-feet of the discovery and the




Staff Report: Z-164-24-3
February 12, 2025


time to properly assess the materials. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 20.

19. Staff has not received a completed form for the Waiver of Claims for Diminution
in Value of Property under Proposition 207 (A.R.S. 12-1131 et seq.), as required
by the rezoning application process. Therefore, a stipulation has been added to
require the form be completed and submitted prior to final site plan approval. This
is addressed in Stipulation No. 21.

20. Development and use of the site are subject to all applicable codes and
ordinances. Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements.
Other formal actions such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and
abandonments may be required.

Findings

1. The proposal will create additional housing options in line with the Housing
Phoenix Plan's goal of preserving or creating 50,000 housing units by 2030.

2. As stipulated, the proposal advances the goals and policies of adopted plans and
policies.

3. The proposal is appropriate at this location and is compatible with surrounding
land uses.

Stipulations

1. All building elevations shall contain architectural embellishments and detailing
such as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, variation in window size
and location, and/or overhang canopies, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

2. All landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, large
canopy, shade trees planted 20 feet on center, or equivalent groupings, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

3. Where pedestrian pathways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

4. A minimum 30 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for the
south half of Peoria Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.




Staff Report: Z-164-24-3
February 12, 2025



5. A minimum 6-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum 5-foot-wide
landscape area shall be constructed on the south side of Peoria Avenue and
planted to the following standards, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department:

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees planted
20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment for installing the required plants.

6. A minimum of 50 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for the
west half of Cave Creek Road, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

7. A minimum 6-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum 10-foot-
wide landscape area shall be constructed on the west side of Cave Creek Road
and planted to the following standards, as approved or modified by the Planning
and Development Department:

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees planted
20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment for installing the required plants.

8. All mitigation improvements shall be constructed and/or funded as identified in
the accepted Traffic Impact Analysis dated January 29, 2025.

9. Replace unused driveways with sidewalk, curb, and gutter. Also, replace any
broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on all streets and
upgrade all off-site improvements to be in compliance with current ADA
guidelines.

10. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and




Staff Report: Z-164-24-3
February 12, 2025


Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

11. A bus bay and pad along Cave Creek Road shall be constructed per the
requirements of City of Phoenix Standard Details P1256, P1258, and P1262, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. The entirety of the
facility shall be placed within the public right-of-way or an easement. Additional
right-of-way dedication may be necessary as required by the Planning and
Development Department.

12. A minimum of 2% of the required parking spaces shall include Electric Vehicle
(EV) Installed infrastructure. A minimum of 8% of the required parking spaces
shall include EV Capable infrastructure.

13. The development shall incorporate bicycle infrastructure as described below
and as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. The developer shall provide secure bicycle parking per Section 1307 of
the Zoning Ordinance.

b. Guest bicycle parking shall be provided at a minimum rate of 0.05 space
per dwelling unit, up to a maximum of 50 spaces.

c. A minimum of 10 percent of the provided bicycle parking spaces shall
include standard electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging
capabilities.

d. A bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided and maintained
on site within an amenity area or near a primary site entrance. The bicycle
repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided in an area of high visibility
and separated from vehicular maneuvering areas, where applicable. The
repair station shall include, but not be limited to:

i. Standard repair tools affixed to the station;

ii. A tire gauge and pump affixed to the base of the station or the
ground;

iii. A bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin freely
while making adjustments to the bike.

14. All bicycle infrastructure, pedestrian pathways (including sidewalks), and transit
stops shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping, or a combination of the two




Staff Report: Z-164-24-3
February 12, 2025


to provide a minimum of 75% shade, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

15. Natural turf shall only be utilized for required retention areas (bottom of basin,
and only allowed on slopes if required for slope stabilization) and functional turf
areas, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

16. Pressure regulating sprinkler heads and/or drip lines shall be utilized in any turf
areas to reduce water waste.

17. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the Water Efficiency Program for a
minimum of ten years, or as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

18. A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for
stormwater management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This
includes but is not limited to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales,
permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure
and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater Management.

19. A minimum of 25% of the surface parking areas shall be shaded, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department. Shade may be achieved by
structures or by minimum 2-inch caliper, drought tolerant, shade trees, or a
combination thereof.

20. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

21. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.


Writer
Robert Kuhfuss
February 12, 2025

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar




Staff Report: Z-164-24-3
February 12, 2025


Exhibits
Sketch Map
Aerial Sketch Map
Conceptual Site Plan date stamped January 17, 2025
Conceptual Elevations date stamped January 17, 2025




E A S T P E O R I A AV E N U E 5’
6’
LS STRIP
SIDEWALK
30’ 30’ 30’
ROW

20’ PROPERTY LINE
S/B

GARAGE
15’
ENTRY
S/B
SID 6’
EW
MOTOR AL
K
COURT
LS 10’
PR
STR
IP
OP
ER
TY
LIN
VEHICULAR E
GATE

AMENITY & S/ ’
LEASING B

NEW
AMENITY
BUS BAY
COURTYARD
PARKING
GARAGE
NEW BUS PROJECT DATA:
PAD
ZONING
5 EXISTING: R-5 & C-2
RO 0’
W
PROPOSED: R-5 (PRD OPTION)
PROPERTY LINE

’
ACREAGE
GROSS: 5.2 AC (227,339 SF)
8’-
6” NET: 4.3 AC (185,460 SF)
6” AD UNIT COUNT: 240 UNITS
16’- GARAGE
DOG ENTRY RO DENSITY
8’-6” 10’ X 30’
PARK LOADING REFUSE ALLOWED: 52.20 DU / AC
23’ 5’ STAGING
VEHICULAR GATE 20’ ’
EK
PROPOSED: 46.15 DU / AC
15’ 30
S/B SIDEWALK E
BUILDING HEIGHT
PROPERTY LINE
CR
7’ ALLOWED: 4 STORIES /48 FEET
LS STRIP VE PROPOSED: 4 STORIES /48 FEET
CA LOT COVERAGE
ALLOWED: 50% (92,730 SF)
RT PROPOSED: 49% (91,117 SF)
H
NO COMMON AREA
REQUIRED: 5% (11,367 SF)
PROPOSED: 10% (22,734 SF)
PARKING
REQUIRED 360 (1.5 SPACE / UNIT)
PROVIDED 373 SPACES

PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE.




VALLE VIEW | CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 0’ 15’ 30’ 60’

01/17/2025 NORTH SCALE 1” = 30’




ATTACHMENT C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-164-24-3

Date of VPC Meeting February 19, 2025
Request From C-2
Request To R-5
Proposal Multifamily residential
Location Southwest corner of Cave Creek Road and Peoria
Avenue
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation, with direction
VPC Vote 13-0-1


VPC DISCUSSION:

Seven members of the public registered in opposition of this item, four wishing to
speak.
Four members of the public registered in support of this item, two wishing to speak.

STAFF PRESENTATION
Robert Kuhfuss, staff, displayed the aerial sketch map and identified the subject site.
Mr. Kuhfuss noted the requested zoning designation and summarized the surrounding
land uses to the north, west, east, and south. Mr. Kuhfuss stated that the proposed
multifamily development would occur within the larger five-acre site and that the area
being considered for rezoning was the two-acres located adjacent to Cave Creek
Road. Mr. Kuhfuss discussed the site plan and elevations. Mr. Kuhfuss provided the
staff findings, recommendations, and proposed stipulations.

APPLICATION PRESENTATION
Alan Beaudoin, representing the applicant with Norris Design, stated they conducted
an expensive outreach process and that they agree with all the proposed stipulations.
Mr. Beaudoin introduced his team and summarized the existing conditions of the site
noting the blighted conditions. Mr. Beaudoin displayed images of the site after the
buildings were razed and the existing wash was cleared. Mr. Beaudoin discussed the
historic pattern of strip commercial development along Cave Creek Road, the
adjacent multifamily zoning, and their desire to rezone the front portion of the larger
five-acre site to the same as the current zoning of the rear portion. Mr. Beaudoin
displayed the proposed site plan and noted the different accessways of the site. Mr.
Beaudoin concluded the presentation by displaying elevation renderings and


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 220
North Mountain Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-164-24-3

perspective drawings, and how the building would interact with the surrounding
properties.

QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE
Committee Member Steve Pamperin stated that he lived down the street from the
property and noted that the proposed four-story building was taller than anything in
the surrounding area, including a multifamily development north of the site.
Committee Member Pamperin asked why the proposal consisted of a four-story
building. Mr. Beaudoin stated that the majority of the site was zoned R-5, which
allowed for a maximum of four stories, and that the number of units is critically
important to the success of the plan. Mr. Beaudoin added that their proposal
eliminated possible high commuter commercial development while providing housing
that met R-5 development standards. Mr. Beaudoin stated that they had contemplated
rezoning the site to PUD but ultimately decided on a request for R-5 zoning. Mr.
Beaudoin noted that the Peoria Avenue frontage adjacent to the site has never been
improved and that this development will include right-of-way dedication and street
improvements on Peoria Avenue which will include a left turn lane and dedicated right
turn lane. Mr. Beaudoin added that street lights will also be installed, which will
address community concerns over lighting.

Committee Member Elizabeth Pérez-Pawloski stated that the proposed height will
drastically change the character of the area. Committee Member Pérez-Pawloski
reiterated the existing height established by other surrounding developments and
asked if there was a possibility to reconsider the height. Mr. Beaudoin noted that staff
had expressed the same concerns. Mr. Beaudoin noted that the proposed parking
structure was an important part of the proposal and that parking structures were very
expensive to construct. Mr. Beaudoin stated that the number of units and height
proposed would ensure revenue when compared to the cost of the parking structure.
Committee Member Pérez-Pawloski reiterated her concern for the character of the
community and added her concerns regarding safety on Cave Creek Road, Peoria
Avenue, and 7th Street. Committee Member Pérez-Pawloski stated that there is a lot
of congestion due to North Mountain, especially during the weekend, and voiced her
concern regarding additional congestion in the area. Mr. Beaudoin stated that their
main driveway would be located on Cave Creek Road and that a bus bay would also
be installed which would contribute to traffic safety. Committee Member Pérez-
Pawloski stated that she appreciated the streetlighting but noted that traffic
congestion is a concern. Mr. Beaudoin added that staff had drafted Stipulation No. 1
to ensure consistent architectural features that were compatible with the surrounding
buildings, and that Stipulation No. 1 was in direct response to maintaining community
character.

Committee Member Joshua Carmona asked how many units are proposed for the
development. Mr. Beaudoin noted that there were approximately 240 units.
Committee Member Carmona asked how many two- and three-bedroom units will be
available, and if there will be single units proposed. Mr. Beaudoin stated that further
evaluation was required to ultimately decide on the number of two- and three-
bedroom units. Mr. Beaudoin added that a market analysis would be needed to make
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 221
North Mountain Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-164-24-3

the determination. Mr. Beaudoin asked if the community had a request for the type of
units to share that with his team.

Committee Member Massimo Sommacampagna asked if the proposal will require
right-of-way dedication and improvements including a sidewalk for the southern
portion of Peoria Avenue and along the west side of the subject site. Mr. Beaudoin
confirmed that the Street Transportation Department requires a dedication of 30 feet
to build a collector street. Mr. Beaudoin added that an average collector street
consists of 40 feet of pavement measured from curb to curb, but the project will
provide more pavement width to allow for a right-turn only lane onto Cave Creek
Road. Mr. Beaudoin noted that the Street Transportation Department has added a
stipulation to require a six-foot-wide detached sidewalk with large caliper shade trees.

PUBLIC COMMENT

Germain Barnes stated that she was a resident of Pointe Tapatio and that she
owned a townhome south of Peoria Avenue and a residence north of Peoria Avenue.
Ms. Barnes added that she was a retired law enforcement lieutenant. Ms. Barnes
stated that the applicant presentation did not represent the neighborhood to the west,
and that this proposal will greatly affect the community. Ms. Barnes stated that most
of the streets in the area were not designed for through traffic and noted that when
there is a traffic accident on Cave Creek Road, law enforcement is required to guide
traffic onto Peoria Avenue causing congestion. Ms. Barnes added that her community
pays over 75,000 dollars annually for private law enforcement services due to the
high crime rates and that the proposal will increase the population by 20 percent in
the area, which will cause serious issues regarding crime and traffic.

Jimmy Marose noted that he lived in the Pointe Tapatio development for over 20
years and is currently on the homeowner’s association board. Mr. Marose stated that
he wrote an article on this proposal and added that the applicant had stated that they
were planning on applying for a height waiver. Mr. Marose noted that the applicant did
not have a total number of units because they were applying for the height waiver. Mr.
Marose stated that the proposed four-story building will block scenic views of the
surrounding townhome developments. Mr. Marose added that Peoria Avenue is only
two lanes and an increase in population will increase traffic on a two-way road. Mr.
Marose noted that the majority surrounding streets are privately owned or maintained
and could not support high traffic congestion. Mr. Marose requested the applicant to
reconsider the height and concluded his comment by stating that the applicant had
not reached out to the surrounding communities.

Megan Juracek stated that she was a resident on Peoria Avenue and that she was
not necessarily opposed to development and is thankful that someone is wanting to
develop the property. Ms. Juracek stated that she appreciated that the proposal was a
departure from all the commercial uses along Cave Creek Road but had some major
concerns. Ms. Juracek stated that she had the same concerns regarding traffic. Ms.
Juracek noted that she was part of the group of individuals that advocated for the
installation of speed bumps on Peoria Avenue to address the excessive speeding on
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 222
North Mountain Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-164-24-3

the road. Ms. Juracek reiterated that if Cave Creek Road is shut down, then traffic
floods into the neighboring communities to the point that residents cannot leave their
own driveways. Ms. Juracek added that 14th Street intersects Peoria Avenue close to
Cave Creek Road and that traffic backs up on 14th Street when trying to turn left onto
Peoria Avenue. Ms. Juracek stated that she was opposed to the density associated
with four stories as well as the major entrance being located on Peoria Avenue. Mr.
Kuhfuss asked for clarification as to whether Ms. Juracek was opposed or in favor.
Chair Fogelson indicated that the speaker card was in favor. Ms. Juracek stated that
she was in favor of development but with changes to the proposal.

Natalie Davenport stated that she was a resident of Palo Verde, located north of the
subject property. Ms. Davenport noted that she was in favor of the development and
that the proposal was a great change from all the commercial development along
Cave Creek Road. Ms. Davenport added that she was a supporter of additional
housing but had some concerns specific to this proposal. Ms. Davenport stated there
are severe traffic safety concerns at the intersection of Peoria Avenue and Cave
Creek Road and agreed that traffic has been filtering into the adjacent
neighborhoods. Ms. Davenport advised adding more major entrances and exits
directly onto Cave Creek Road. Ms. Davenport added that she had concerns about
the number of units because it would contribute to the traffic congestion in the area.
Ms. Davenport noted that the applicant and developer have been very communicative
with their neighborhood group. Ms. Davenport stated that there have been fatalities
on these roads where drivers drive at 90 miles per hour and requests support for
additional traffic controls.

Alison Moran stated that she had no relation to the developer’s representative by the
same name. Ms. Moran noted that she was the board president of a neighborhood
community north of Peoria Avenue. Ms. Moran added that she agreed with the
concerns of 14th Street and added that there were concerns with the intersection at
Desert Cove Avenue and Cave Creek Road. Ms. Moran noted that the intersection of
14th Avenue and Peoria Avenue was very congested and dangerous during peak
hours and added that she was an avid bike rider and voiced safety concerns when
turning left off Cave Creek Road onto Peoria Avenue due to the proposed additional
driveways. Ms. Moran voiced her support for development but noted there were
concerns regarding traffic and proposed height. Chair Fogelson asked for
clarification if Ms. Moran was in support or opposition. Ms. Moran stated that she was
opposed as proposed.

Pat Ford stated that she was in favor of rezoning the site and appreciated the
cleanup of the site but reiterated community concerns regarding traffic. Ms. Ford
noted that she was particularly concerned regarding 14th Street and Peoria Avenue
and stated that residents who live north of Peoria Avenue are forced to use 14th
Street to get to Peoria Avenue or Desert Cove Avenue to access Cave Creek Road.
Ms. Ford noted the limited accessways onto the arterial and stated that the distance
between Cave Creek Road and 14th Street is only 80 feet. Ms. Ford noted that
drivers turning left off 14th Avenue are in danger of drivers on Peoria Avenue and
Cave Creek Road. Ms. Ford added that the community has been advocating for a
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 223
North Mountain Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-164-24-3

traffic signal on Desert Cove Avenue and Cave Creek Road. Ms. Ford stated that she
was opposed to the proposed height because it would allow individuals to peer over
residents. Ms. Ford concluded her comments by stating that she supported
apartments or condos but was opposed to the height.

APPLICANT RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENT

Mr. Beaudoin stated that they did not avoid conversations with the community. Mr.
Beaudoin noted that his team followed the notification requirements and hosted a
neighborhood meeting that was open to the public. Mr. Beaudoin added that no one
who was present at the neighborhood meeting voiced any concerns and that that was
reflected in their Citizen Participation Report. Mr. Beaudoin stated that they attended
a meeting with the Palo Verde Neighborhood and used their comments to modify the
proposal. Mr. Beaudoin encouraged members to reach out to him and his team. Mr.
Beaudoin noted that the misaligned streets, such as the short distance between 14th
Street and Cave Creek Road, occurred before the area was annexed into the City.
Mr. Beaudoin added that they were willing to work with the community to address
these concerns and work with the Street Transportation Department and Planning
and Development Department to explore solutions. Mr. Beaudoin stated that they
were not requesting a height and density waiver. Mr. Beaudoin noted that the R-5
zoning has been established for over 30 years and that the multifamily zoning
designation originated from the County. Mr. Beaudoin stated that the more eyes on
the street and within the community will help alleviate crime. Mr. Beaudoin noted that
more households create more buying power for businesses, restaurants, coffee
shops, etc. Mr. Beaudoin added that this development would be a step forward for the
community. Mr. Beaudoin reiterated that the proposed intensity is in response to the
existing R-5 zoning. Mr. Beaudoin stated that Peoria Avenue is designed as a
collector street, which is designed to feed traffic to arterial streets.

COMMITTEE DISCUSSION:

Committee Member Carmona stated that the site was already zoned R-5 which
would allow the applicant to develop two, three, or four stories by right. Committee
Member Carmona asked if the community would like to keep the site C-2 to limit the
height to two-stories in order to preserve views. Committee Member Carmona added
that any commercial development would also generate traffic and stated that while he
was in favor, he would like to see a solution to the traffic situation in the area.

Committee Member Pérez-Pawloski asked if the existing R-5 zoning allowed any
height the applicant wanted. Mr. Beaudoin noted that it would allow four stories or 48
feet. Committee Member Pérez-Pawloski asked if there was anything they could do,
as a recommending body, to cap density. Committee Member Pérez-Pawloski noted
that based on community input, they were not opposed to development, but rather the
density and height. Committee Member Pérez-Pawloski appreciated the extensive
outreach and asked if the applicant was willing to consider less units. Mr. Beaudoin
stated that the proposed parking garage will cost about 35,000 dollars per parking
space as it requires a lot of material and steel, and that the cost was still to be
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 224
North Mountain Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-164-24-3

determined. Mr. Beaudoin noted that he did not support arbitrarily reducing the
number of units without first having an in-depth analysis. Mr. Beaudoin asked if
reducing the height along Cave Creek Road would alleviate any concern and stated
that if the committee thought that reducing the height was appropriate, then that was
their prerogative. Mr. Beaudoin added that reducing the number of units arbitrarily
would be meaningless. Committee Member Pérez-Pawloski asked if the applicant
would then not be supportive of further discussions. Mr. Beaudoin stated that he could
not answer that because he did not know the number of units that would be removed.
Committee Member Pérez-Pawloski added that they have heard serious concerns
and noted that it seems that the applicant is not willing to have further discussions
with the community. Mr. Beaudoin stated that they might consider it but cannot decide
during this hearing because of the lack of analysis. Mr. Beaudoin added that if the
committee thought it was appropriate, then the committee could add the stipulation.

Committee Member Arick O’Hara asked if because the applicant is seeking a zone
change on the eastern two acres of the site, are they opening up the debate over the
entire five-acre site as opposed to if they left the site how it is, then the developer
could build whatever R-5 allowed and build commercial on the C-2 portion of the site.
Mr. Kuhfuss stated that the stipulations attached to the zoning case would only apply
to the area that is the subject of the zoning case and do not apply to the western three
acres of the site.

Committee Member Patrick Edwards stated that while the argument regarding
traffic was well intended, it was minimal because of the relative size of the property
that is the subject of the rezone. Committee Member Edwards noted that the site is
already zoned R-5 and a difference between 200 or 240 units is minimal when it
comes to traffic congestion. Committee Member Edwards stated that he was
empathetic to the property owners and the economics associated with the project and
added that he appreciated the parking garage. Committee Member Edwards added
that the alternative would be an undeveloped parcel that is an eyesore to the
community.

Committee Member Nadine Alauria noted that she traveled along Cave Creek Road
daily and agreed that more traffic signals are needed along the street. Committee
Member Alauria asked how the community could advocate and work with the city to
get more traffic lights in the area. Mr. Kuhfuss noted that that discussion would have
to involve the Street Transportation Department and added that the rezoning
application required a Traffic Impact Analysis and that the report would indicate
whether traffic signals are warranted. Committee Member Alauria reiterated the
concern over traffic on Peoria Avenue. Committee Member Alauria asked if the
multifamily development would have any private security. Mr. Beaudoin stated that
the project will be managed by a property management company and would provide
security for the residents. Mr. Beaudoin reiterated that the new development will put
eyes on the street.

Committee Member Pamperin stated that he lived in the area and agreed that there
was a lot of commercial development along Cave Creek Road and stated that he
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 225
North Mountain Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-164-24-3

would like to see the site redevelop. Committee Member Pamperin asked if they could
add a stipulation which would require a traffic signal on Desert Cove Avenue. Mr.
Kuhfuss indicated that the applicant submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis for their
proposal. Mr. Kuhfuss noted that he was unaware of all the requirements listed in the
acceptance letter but if a traffic signal was warranted, then it would be found in the
Traffic Impact Analysis. Chair Fogelson stated that she understood that discussions
regarding the regional traffic issues are beyond the Committee’s purview but noted
that it was important because of community concerns. Mr. Kuhfuss stated that he
would follow up with the Street Transportation Department.

Committee Member Pérez-Pawloski asked if there was a set timeline of when the
project needed to be built and wondered if the applicant could have further
conversations with the community. Mr. Beaudoin stated that there was no hard
deadline but noted that there were set dates for the Planning Commission and City
Council. Mr. Beaudoin added that they would have to send out hundreds of letters to
surrounding residents. Mr. Beaudoin agreed that there were traffic concerns in the
area and noted that Desert Cove Avenue is not adjacent to the site. Committee
Member Pérez-Pawloski asked if the applicant was willing to come back and further
discuss the height and traffic issues. Mr. Beaudoin stated that they had R-5 zoning by
right. Mr. Beaudoin added that the main question is whether the Committee wanted to
see the eastern portion of the site develop as commercial or residential. Committee
Member Pérez-Pawloski stated that her goal was to see if the applicant would be
willing to have those conversations. Mr. Beaudoin stated that they welcomed
members of the community to reach out to them and discuss the proposed project.
Mr. Beaudoin noted that they would not be removing units arbitrarily. Committee
Member Pérez-Pawloski added that these conversations would be a sign of good
faith. Mr. Beaudoin agreed and noted that they were willing to educate and talk with
the community.

Committee Member Mike Krentz stated that they could build up to four-stories by
right but by bringing this via a rezoning case, it would allow for some form-based
design and conditions. Committee Member Krentz asked if the applicant was willing to
consider step backs. Committee Member Krentz stated there were single-family
houses across the street zoned R-5 that could be redeveloped with a maximum
height of 48 feet and four-stories. Committee Member Krentz added that by making a
rezoning request, the street will be improved, and that the committee could consider a
step back in height. Committee Member Krentz reiterated that the west end of the site
is already zoned R-5.

Committee Member O’Hara noted a similar project on Indian School Road and
Central Avenue that involved a parking garage. Committee Member O’Hara agreed
that the street was narrow but added that C-2 would allow for numerous commercial
opportunities, bringing more people to the area. Committee Member O’Hara further
added that the parking garage would help alleviate crime and there would be no
added benefit to the community to discuss surrounding traffic issues if they still have
to go to Planning Commission by March 6th. Committee Member O’Hara stated that
the main concerns are height and density but on three-fourths of the site the height
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 226
North Mountain Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-164-24-3

and density are already permitted. Committee Member O’Hara reiterated that the
parking garage would add to the security of the area.

Committee Member Matthew Knapp noted that if the proposed development does
not include the eastern portion of the site, there would not be any way for traffic to exit
the site other than through Peoria Avenue. Committee Member Knapp stated that a
holistic plan was required to meet the community traffic needs.

Committee Member Heather Garbarino stated that without the “parallelogram”
being rezoned it could lead to the elimination of the parking garage. Committee
Member Garbarino stated that they could still put in as many units as they want and
parking will be on the ground level, thus not helping traffic. Committee Member
Garbarino added that she liked the design but would like for it to blend more
harmoniously with the community aesthetic and stated that were this development to
occur, the goal would be to make it happen gracefully. Committee Member Krentz
stated that they didn’t have a voice in design until the ordinance is changed.

Chair Fogelson encouraged the community to voice their support or opposition by
submitting letters to staff or attending the Planning Commission hearing or the City
Council meeting.

MOTION:
Committee Member Arick O’Hara motioned to recommend approval of Z-164-24-3
per the staff recommendation, with direction for the applicant to hold another
neighborhood meeting prior to the Planning Commission hearing on March 6, 2025.
Committee Member Patrick Edwards seconded the motion.

DISCUSSION:
Committee Member O’Hara stated he valued the input from the public and that the
concerns expressed only pertained to a small portion of the site but wanted them to
have the opportunity to engage with the applicant.

Committee Member Pamperin stated that he had concerns regarding traffic and
would like for the City to look at Desert Cove Avenue.

Committee Member Pérez-Pawloski stated that the project was going to happen but
were tied by existing zoning and asked the developer to have more engagement with
the community.

VOTE:
13-0-1, motion to recommend approval of Z-164-24-3 per the staff recommendation
with direction passes with Committee Members Barraza, Carmona, Edwards,
Garbarino, Harris, Jaramillo, Knapp, Krentz, O’Hara, Pamperin, Pérez-Pawloski,
Sommacampagna, and Fogelson in favor, none opposed, and Alauria in abstention.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 227
North Mountain Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-164-24-3

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 228
ATTACHMENT D

REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
March 6, 2025

ITEM NO: 9
DISTRICT NO.: 3
SUBJECT:

Application #: Z-164-24-3
Location: Southwest corner of Cave Creek Road and Peoria Avenue
From: C-2
To: R-5
Acreage: 2.18
Proposal: Multifamily residential
Applicant: Allante Properties
Owner: Valle Point, LLC
Representative: Alan Beaudoin, Norris Design

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
North Mountain 2/19/2025 Approval, per the staff recommendation, with direction. Vote:
13-0-1.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the North Mountain Village Planning
Committee recommendation.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve Z-164-24-3, per the North
Mountain Village Planning Committee recommendation.

Maker: Matthews
Second: James
Vote: 7-0
Absent: Gorraiz, Read
Opposition Present: Yes

Findings:

1. The proposal will create additional housing options in line with the Housing Phoenix
Plan's goal of preserving or creating 50,000 housing units by 2030.

2. As stipulated, the proposal advances the goals and policies of adopted plans and
policies.

3. The proposal is appropriate at this location and is compatible with surrounding land
uses.




Stipulations:

1. All building elevations shall contain architectural embellishments and detailing such as
textural changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, variation in window size and location,
and/or overhang canopies, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

2. All landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, large canopy,
shade trees planted 20 feet on center, or equivalent groupings, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

3. Where pedestrian pathways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be constructed of
decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments that
visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

4. A minimum 30 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for the south half
of Peoria Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

5. A minimum 6-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum 5-foot-wide
landscape area shall be constructed on the south side of Peoria Avenue and planted to
the following standards, as approved or modified by the Planning and Development
Department:

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees planted 20 feet
on center, or in equivalent groupings.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian
environment for installing the required plants.

6. A minimum of 50 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for the west
half of Cave Creek Road, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

7. A minimum 6-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum 10-foot-wide
landscape area shall be constructed on the west side of Cave Creek Road and planted
to the following standards, as approved or modified by the Planning and Development
Department:

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees planted 20 feet
on center, or in equivalent groupings.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian
environment for installing the required plants.

8. All mitigation improvements shall be constructed and/or funded as identified in the
accepted Traffic Impact Analysis dated January 29, 2025.



9. Replace unused driveways with sidewalk, curb, and gutter. Also, replace any broken or
out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on all streets and upgrade all off-
site improvements to be in compliance with current ADA guidelines.

10. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with paving,
curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping and other
incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development Department. All
improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

11. A bus bay and pad along Cave Creek Road shall be constructed per the requirements
of City of Phoenix Standard Details P1256, P1258, and P1262, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department. The entirety of the facility shall be placed
within the public right-of-way or an easement. Additional right-of-way dedication may be
necessary as required by the Planning and Development Department.

12. A minimum of 2% of the required parking spaces shall include Electric Vehicle (EV)
Installed infrastructure. A minimum of 8% of the required parking spaces shall include
EV Capable infrastructure.

13. The development shall incorporate bicycle infrastructure as described below and as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. The developer shall provide secure bicycle parking per Section 1307 of the
Zoning Ordinance.

b. Guest bicycle parking shall be provided at a minimum rate of 0.05 space per
dwelling unit, up to a maximum of 50 spaces.

c. A minimum of 10 percent of the provided bicycle parking spaces shall include
standard electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities.

d. A bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided and maintained on site
within an amenity area or near a primary site entrance. The bicycle repair station
(“fix it station”) shall be provided in an area of high visibility and separated from
vehicular maneuvering areas, where applicable. The repair station shall include,
but not be limited to:

i. Standard repair tools affixed to the station;

ii. A tire gauge and pump affixed to the base of the station or the ground;

iii. A bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin freely while
making adjustments to the bike.

14. All bicycle infrastructure, pedestrian pathways (including sidewalks), and transit stops
shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping, or a combination of the two to provide a
minimum of 75% shade, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

15. Natural turf shall only be utilized for required retention areas (bottom of basin, and only
allowed on slopes if required for slope stabilization) and functional turf areas, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

16. Pressure regulating sprinkler heads and/or drip lines shall be utilized in any turf areas
to reduce water waste.
17. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that demonstrates a
commitment to participate in the Water Efficiency Program for a minimum of ten years,
or as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

18. A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for stormwater
management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This includes but is not limited
to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales, permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater
Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure and Low Impact Development Details for
Alternative Stormwater Management.

19. A minimum of 25% of the surface parking areas shall be shaded, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department. Shade may be achieved by structures or by
minimum 2-inch caliper, drought tolerant, shade trees, or a combination thereof.

20. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

21. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207 waiver of
claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County Recorder's Office
and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application file for record.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Saneeya Mir at 602-686-6461, saneeya.mir@phoenix.gov, TTY: Use 7-1-1.




ATTACHMENT E




PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT




To: Alan Stephenson Date: April 18, 2025
Deputy City Manager

From: Joshua Bednarek�
Planning and Devfi;pment Director
Subject: ITEM 60 ON THE MAY 7, 2025, FORMAL AGENDA- PUBLIC HEARING/
FORMAL ACTION - REZONING APPLICATION Z-164-24-3 - SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF CAVE CREEK ROAD AND PEORIA AVENUE (ORDINANCE
G-7387)
Item No. 60, Rezoning Application No. Z-164-24-3 is a request to rezone 2.18 acres
located at the southwest corner of Cave Creek Road and Peoria Avenue from C-2
(Intermediate Commercial District) to R-5 (Multifamily Residence District) to allow a
multifamily residential.

The North Mountain Village Planning Committee (VPC) heard this request on February
19, 2025, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, with direction, by
a vote of 13-0-1.

The Planning Commission heard this request on March 6, 2025, and recommended
approval, per the North Mountain VPC recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.

This item was scheduled for the April 9, 2025, Formal Agenda, however in order to
address community concerns, the item was withdrawn from the agenda to allow the City
Council an opportunity to consider modifications.

The applicant has agreed to add a stipulation limiting access onto Peoria Avenue to
right turn only from the primary tenant driveway. This is addressed in new stipulation
No. 9 below in BOLD AND CAPITAL letters.

Staff recommends approval, subject to the following stipulations:

1. All building elevations shall contain architectural embellishments and detailing
such as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, variation in window size
and location, and/or overhang canopies, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

2. All landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, large
canopy, shade trees planted 20 feet on center, or equivalent groupings, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

3. Where pedestrian pathways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other






Report