Meeting City Council Formal Meeting-6/1/2022 complete
2022-06-01 · Formal
City Council Formal Meeting
Item text
Summary
This item transmits recommendations from the Mayor and Council for appointment or
reappointment to City Boards and Commissions.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Mayor's Office.
Page 11
ATTACHMENT A
To: City Council Date: June 1, 2022
From: Mayor Kate Gallego
Subject: *REVISED FOR ADD-ON: BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS – APPOINTEES
The purpose of this memo is to provide recommendations for appointments to the
following Boards and Commissions:
Civil Service Board
I recommend the following for reappointment:
Bruce Meyerson
Bruce Meyerson is serving his fourth term to expire April 30, 2024.
*Encanto Village Planning Committee
Vice Mayor Laura Pastor recommends the following for appointment:
Randy Schiller
Mr. Schiller is the Regional Vice President of AMS Vans LLC and a resident of District
4. He fills a vacancy for a term to expire November 19, 2023.
General Obligation Bond Committee
Recommendations from the Fiscal Capacity Committee for the total amount of the
proposed 2023 General Obligation Bond Program will be presented for City Council
action at the June 7th Policy meeting. The General Obligation Bond Committee will
evaluate and prioritize proposed projects for the program, and the City Council is
tentatively scheduled to consider these recommendations in December 2022.
The General Obligation Bond Committee will be made up of an Executive Committee
and eight subcommittees: Public Safety; Streets and Storm Drainage; Parks and
Recreation; Neighborhoods and City Services; Housing, Human Services, and
Homelessness; Environment and Sustainability; Arts and Culture; and Economic
Page 12
Development and Education. The Executive Committee will be made up of the seven
members listed below, as well as the Chairs of each subcommittee.
Committee meetings and activity are anticipated from August through December 2022,
with approximately four to six meetings required for each member, dependent upon the
committee assignment. The committee will sunset November 30, 2023.
I recommend the following for appointment:
Executive Committee
Chair, Sharon Harper, Plaza Companies
Vice Chair, Dr. LeeAnn Aguilar-Lawlor, Cartwright Elementary School District
Ron Butler, Fiscal Capacity Committee
Jennifer Grandahl, LiUNA Local 777
Pam Kehaly, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona
Dana Kennedy, American Association of Retired Persons
Rick Naimark, Arizona State University
Public Safety
Chair, Steve Beuerlein, United Phoenix Firefighters Charities
Rick DeGraw, 2006 Bond Committee Public Safety Chair
Anne Ender, North Central Phoenix Homeowners Association
Derrick Hall, Arizona Diamondbacks
Greg Jackson, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company
Gail Knight, Balsz School Board
Daniel Valenzuela, Former City Councilmember
Alton Washington, Former Assistant City Manager
Thelda Williams, Former Mayor and City Councilmember
Streets & Storm Drainage
Chair, David Martin, Arizona Associated General Contractors
Ray Acuña, Professional Engineer
Ryan Boyd, Urban Phoenix Project
Carole Coles Henry, Former Equal Opportunity Department Director
Justin Graham, Sunbelt Holdings
Manish Gupta, Small Business Owner
Kevin Olson, Lewis Roca
Chet Teaford, Gannett Fleming
Steve Trussell, Arizona Rock Products Association
Parks & Recreation
Chair, Mary Rose Wilcox, Former County Supervisor and City Councilmember
John Bullock, Osborn Maledon
Page 13
Dana Burns, Permanent Voice Foundation
Adrian Garcia, Independent Artist
Brett Hunt, Leadership Development and Veteran Advocate
Gary Kaasa, Riester
Tim Madrid, Sierra Linda High School
Elizabeth Perez, Arizona Education Association
Jeff Spellman, Community Leader
Neighborhoods & City Services
Chair, Abraham James, Library Advisory Board
Mike Brown, Community Development
Michelle Dodds, Former City Historic Preservation Director
GG George, Phoenix Historic Neighborhoods Coalition
Dan Klocke, Historic Preservation Commission Chair
Eva Olivas, Phoenix Revitalization Corporation
Daniel Oseran, Desert Ridge Homeowners Association
Jennifer Rouse, Phoenix Block Watch Advisory Board
Stefanie Smith, Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System
Housing, Human Services & Homelessness
Chair, Diana Yazzie Devine, Native American Connections
Sean Berens, Phoenix Residential Investment Development Effort Board
Carolyn Chatman, Former Public Works Department Director
Shana Ellis, Arizona State University Watts College
Deanna Jonovich, Former Assistant City Manager
Suzanne Pfister, Vitalyst
Ryan Senters, Ohana AZ
Brian Swanton, Gorman & Co.
Victor Vidales, Realtor
Environment & Sustainability
Chair, Ginger Torres, Environmental Quality and Sustainability Commission
Gene D’Adamo, Nina Pulliam Trust
Pat Edwards, Burns McDonnell
Ian O’Grady, Nowak Metro Finance Lab
Lisa Perez, Electric Vehicle Ad Hoc Committee and Planning Commission
Shannon Scutari, South Central Collaborative
Dan Stellar, The Nature Conservancy
Colin Tetreault, EY
Serena Unrein, Arizona Partnership for Healthy Communities
Arts & Culture
Chair, Devney Preuss, Downtown Phoenix Inc.
Page 14
Teniqua Broughton, State of Black Arizona
Gretchen Freeman, Public Art Consultant
Sam Gomez, The Sagrado
Alfredo Gutierrez, Community Leader
Annette Musa, Hispanic Chamber of Commerce
John Owens, Historic Neighborhood Resident
Ron Price, Visit Phoenix
Donna Reiner, Friends of Phoenix Public Art
Economic Development & Education
Chair, Robin Reed, Arizona Black Chamber
Heather Carter, Greater Phoenix Leadership
Austin Kennedy, Rio Reimagined
Verma Pastor, Rio Reimagined
Duke Reiter, Arizona State University
Todd Sanders, Phoenix Chamber of Commerce
Larry Sandigo, Arizona Board of Regents
Dr. Jacque Sokolov, SSB Solutions Inc.
Dr. Jeff Sprout, Laveen Elementary School District
Water/ Wastewater Rate Advisory Committee
I recommend the following for appointment:
Karen Loschiavo
Ms. Loschiavo is the Founder of Campaign Roots and a resident of District 4. She fills a
vacancy for a term to expire June 1, 2025.
Page 15
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request to permit the swearing in of Municipal Court Judges.
Summary
Administer the oath of office for the Honorable Tina Solomon to a four-year term as
Judge of the Phoenix Municipal Court to end on June 29, 2026.
Administer the oath of office for the Honorable Laura Lowery to a four-year term as
Judge of the Phoenix Municipal Court to end on Sept. 30, 2026.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
On April 8, 2022 the Judicial Selection Advisory Board recommended approval to the
Public Safety and Justice Subcommittee.
On May 11, 2022 the Public Safety and Justice Subcommittee recommended approval
to the City Council by a vote of 4-0.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the City Council
Office.
Page 16
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 195290.
Summary
Applicant
Amy Nations, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
21001 N. Tatum Blvd., Ste. 98
Zoning Classification: C-2 DRSP
Council District: 2
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is June 13, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
Page 17
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Famous Dave's (Series 12)
3250 W. Frye Road, Chandler
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Famous Dave's (Series 12)
1011 N. Dobson Road, Mesa
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Famous Dave's (Series 12)
16148 N. 83rd Ave., Peoria
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“The new ownership of Barrio Queen currently operates over 100 various restaurants
throughout the United States. They are very knowledgeable is how to operate a
successful business with a liquor license. All staff members will attend Arizona certified
liquor law training to ensure compliance will all liquor laws.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Barrio Queen is a neighborhood favorite offering authentic regional Mexican dishes.
This is an award winning restaurant making family recipes using top notch ingredients
and served to our patrons in a fun, engaging way.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Page 18
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Barrio Queen
Liquor License Map - Barrio Queen
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 19
Liquor License Data: BARRIO QUEEN
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 10 7
Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 1
Liquor Store 9 3 3
Beer and Wine Store 10 4 3
Hotel 11 1 0
Restaurant 12 30 26
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 10.27 34.92
Violent Crimes 5.03 0.90 2.54
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 4
Total Violations 92 4
Page 20
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
6150003 344 8% 38 % 5%
6151001 1444 84 % 18 % 8%
6152001 1993 8% 29 % 12 %
6152002 2127 70 % 10 % 4%
6152003 867 89 % 26 % 2%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 21
Liquor License Map: BARRIO QUEEN
21001 N TATUM BLVD
Ü
Date: 4/18/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 22
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 1207B202.
Summary
Applicant
Amy Nations, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
7000 E. Mayo Blvd., Bldg. 18, Ste. 1072
Zoning Classification: PUD PCD
Council District: 2
This request is for an acquisition of control of an existing liquor license for a restaurant.
This location is currently licensed for liquor sales.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is June 6, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration may be given only to the applicant's personal
qualifications.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Cien Agaves Tacos & Tequila (Series 12)
7228 E. 1st Ave., Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Page 23
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We train all of our employees in responsible liquor service. We conduct regular audits
to ensure compliance. The owners have also recently taken the basic and
management liquor training to stay up to date. They own and operate other restaurants
and have operated for many years.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 24
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 195844.
Summary
Applicant
Ninos Malki, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
2505 E. Bell Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 2
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit. This location
requires a Use Permit to allow outdoor dining and outdoor alcohol consumption.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is June 17, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 25
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am a law abiding citizen that complies will all rules and regulations. I am also very
aware of the responsibility as an owner/operator towards the safety of our customers.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This will be a great convenience for customers if they choose to have an adult
beverage with their meal.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Garden of Eden Club
Liquor License Map - Garden of Eden Club
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 26
Liquor License Data: GARDEN OF EDEN CLUB
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 3 1
Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 2
Liquor Store 9 8 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 6 3
Restaurant 12 15 9
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 30.25 46.81
Violent Crimes 5.03 9.10 9.66
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 124
Total Violations 92 308
Page 27
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1033041 1926 47 % 13 % 34 %
1033051 1180 47 % 29 % 35 %
1033052 2333 59 % 9% 30 %
1033061 921 18 % 28 % 32 %
1036063 2174 78 % 13 % 25 %
6194001 1068 54 % 32 % 9%
6195003 2362 65 % 14 % 8%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 28
Liquor License Map: GARDEN OF EDEN CLUB
2505 E BELL RD
Ü
Date: 4/21/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 29
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 189739.
Summary
Applicant
Ryan Anderson, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
8039 N. 35th Ave.
Zoning Classification: PSC
Council District: 5
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is June 10, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.
Page 30
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“The applicant, CEC Entertainment (Arizona), LLC successfully and responsibly
operates many liquor at its restaurants across the United States, including other
locations in Arizona. CEC holds its employees to a very high standard regarding
responsible compliance of liquor laws.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“CEC Entertainment (Arizona), LLC d/b/a Chuck E Cheese's is a responsible business
owner and good neighbor that takes alcohol compliance very seriously. Customers
have come to expect and enjoy alcohol and other beverages served with meal
purchases at pizza restaurants. This business has been operating for many years at
this location and would like to keep alcoholic beverages as a compliment to its food
and beverage offerings at the request of and for enjoyment by its customers.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Chuck E Cheese's #621
Liquor License Map - Chuck E Cheese's #621
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 31
Liquor License Data: CHUCK E CHEESE'S #621
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 3 2
Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 14 3
Restaurant 12 6 4
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 43.84 51.06
Violent Crimes 5.03 17.56 22.18
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 152
Total Violations 94 280
Page 32
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1056012 1895 76 % 6% 27 %
1056021 2042 80 % 0% 26 %
1056022 2457 38 % 23 % 34 %
1056023 2787 15 % 21 % 27 %
1057021 2725 66 % 7% 22 %
1057022 1187 68 % 22 % 7%
1058001 1575 74 % 8% 13 %
1059001 1697 50 % 0% 42 %
1059002 2227 70 % 11 % 22 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 33
Liquor License Map: CHUCK E CHEESE'S #621
8039 N 35TH AVE
Ü
Date: 4/12/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 34
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 09071014.
Summary
Applicant
Merai Aranki, Agent
License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store
Location
2302 E. Van Buren St.
Zoning Classification: C-3
Council District: 8
This request is for an ownership transfer of a liquor license for a liquor store. This
location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an
interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is June 17, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
Page 35
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Liquor Wheel #2 (Series 9)
2209 N. 16th St., Phoenix
Calls for police service: 5
Liquor license violations: None
Cork & Bottle Liquor (Series 9)
4101 E. McDowell Road, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 41
Liquor license violations: None
Liquor Wheel (Series 9)
3445 E. McDowell Road, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 8
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have owned retail liquor stores for more than 30 years. Currently, I own three (3)
other stores within the City of Phoenix. All of my stores are clean, well maintained and
in full compliance with local and state laws. My two sons help me with this family
business.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“The store has been run as a retail liquor store for well over 40 years. I will upgrade the
exterior; it has been neglected. I will maintain this store as I maintain my other stores.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
Page 36
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Liquor Wheel #3
Liquor License Map - Liquor Wheel #3
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 37
Liquor License Data: LIQUOR WHEEL #3
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 1 0
Bar 6 1 1
Liquor Store 9 3 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 13 3
Restaurant 12 4 1
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 27.57 31.10
Violent Crimes 5.03 21.36 35.56
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 197
Total Violations 93 416
Page 38
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1133001 2490 40 % 12 % 49 %
1133002 1119 0% 11 % 91 %
1133003 901 22 % 23 % 72 %
1134001 589 0% 0% 100 %
1138012 834 21 % 19 % 47 %
1139001 1126 20 % 18 % 81 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 39
Liquor License Map: LIQUOR WHEEL #3
2302 E VAN BUREN ST
Ü
Date: 4/20/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 40
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 06070027.
Summary
Applicant
Angelica Carrillo Contreras, Agent
License Type
Series 6 - Bar
Location
3613 E. Van Buren St.
Zoning Classification: C-3
Council District: 8
This request is for an ownership and location transfer of a liquor license for a bar. This
location was previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is June 4, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
Page 41
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Club 4th Avenue (6 Series)
1901 S. 4th Ave., Tucson
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: In August 2018, a fine of $1,500 was paid for selling liquor to
an intoxicated or disorderly person and for allowing the intoxicated or disorderly person
to remain on the business premises for thirty minutes. In January 2022, a fine of
$1,500 was paid for failure to request ID from an underage buyer and for selling, giving
and furnishing an underage person with alcohol.
Public Opinion
Two letters protesting the issuance of this license have been received and are on file in
the Office of the City Clerk. The letters are from local residents. They feel that the
business does not serve the needs, or the best interest of the community and that
granting this license will negatively impact the neighborhood by creating parking issues
and increased calls for police service. Additionally, they feel that adding this business
to the neighborhood does not align with the current redevelopment efforts taking place
in the area.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have been involved in the industry for many years and I have broad knowledge of
liquor rules and regulations. My most recent experience was managing Club Santa Fe
in Cashion, AZ from January 2016 until October 2021. During my 5 plus years serving
in this location not a single liquor violation was issued. I make sure all personal was
following liquor rules and that venue was properly license from all required
departments.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“I will provide a venue were the community can gather, enjoy the live bands performing
and dance in a family oriented atmosphere.”
Page 42
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends disapproval of this application based on a Police Department
recommendation for disapproval and neighborhood protests. The Police Department
disapproval is based on the applicant's recent history of liquor license violations at
another location under the applicant's responsibility and control. The applicant has not
demonstrated the capability, qualifications and reliability to hold and control a liquor
license and that the public convenience requires and the best interest of the
community will be substantially served by the issuance of this license.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Bandoleros Night Club
Liquor License Map - Bandoleros Night Club
Liquor License Police Department Recommendation - Bandoleros Night Club
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 43
Liquor License Data: BANDOLEROS NIGHT CLUB
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 2 0
Bar 6 2 0
Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 1
Conveyance 8 2 0
Liquor Store 9 1 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 7 1
Hotel 11 4 1
Restaurant 12 2 1
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 51.45 175.71 268.15
Violent Crimes 9.65 30.22 47.34
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 142
Total Violations 94 269
Page 44
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1136011 1911 16 % 21 % 11 %
1136021 1061 49 % 11 % 53 %
1136022 1619 48 % 14 % 40 %
1137002 1578 21 % 11 % 59 %
1138011 1007 13 % 30 % 31 %
1138021 0 0% 0% 0%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 45
Liquor License Map: BANDOLEROS NIGHT CLUB
3613 E VAN BUREN ST
Ü
Date: 4/6/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 46
Page 47
PAYMENT ORDINANCE (Ordinance S-48678) (Items 9-12)
Ordinance S-48678 is a request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse funds, up to amounts indicated below, for the purpose of
paying vendors, contractors, claimants and others, and providing
additional payment authority under certain existing city contracts. This
section also requests continuing payment authority, up to amounts
indicated below, for the following contracts, contract extensions and/or
bids awarded. As indicated below, some items below require payment
pursuant to Phoenix City Code section 42-13.
9 Loomacres, Inc. doing business as Loomacres Wildlife
Management
For $25,000.00 in additional payment authority for Contract 147275 for
wildlife management services for the Aviation Department. The contract
provides for a full time, on-site biologist to administer the airport wildlife
hazard management plan and to conduct a comprehensive wildlife hazard
assessment at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX). The
biologist works with Aviation Department officials to prevent and mitigate
safety hazards related to wild and feral vertebrate animals at PHX, as well
as Phoenix Deer Valley and Phoenix Goodyear airports. Additional funds
are being requested for the required wildlife hazard assessment and
additional hours charged for wildlife services at all three City-owned
airports.
10 City of Goodyear - Water Utility Payments
For $274,500.00 in additional payment authority through June 30, 2022,
to the City of Goodyear for Phoenix Goodyear Airport (GYR) water utility
charges, as provided in the GYR's operating budget. The GYR is
physically located in the City of Goodyear. Effective Jan. 1, 2022, the City
of Goodyear implemented a new method for billing water utility charges to
GYR, and GYR will be responsible for billing individual tenants for their
portion of utility charges. The additional funds will allow GYR to process
Page 48
payments in a timely manner, while working with tenants to bill back
charges.
11 Off the X, Inc.
For $23,427.00 in payment authority to purchase two Saint Model XL
Breaching Tool Packages for the Special Assignments Unit (SAU) of the
Phoenix Police Department. The SAU is responsible for the safe
resolution of a variety of incidents including barricaded subjects, high-risk
search warrants, arrests of subjects with a high violence potential, and
workplace-school active shooter incidents. The Saint Model XL Breaching
Tool is a hydraulic battery-operated mechanical device that is used to gain
entry through metal doors, windows, and other enclosures and to secure
entry points within a structure. Funding for this purchase is available
through the Fiscal Year 2019 Urban Area and Security Initiative grant.
12 Xtreme Stitch Embroidery and Sports Clothing Design,
LLC
For $16,290.00 in payment authority to purchase yellow and red parking
meter covers for the Street Transportation Department. This is a one-time
purchase for meter hoods that are used and reused throughout the City
whenever a parking meter is required to be out-of-service for a special
event, construction project, or development project. Meter hoods keep
citizens and contractors from parking in spaces that are needed to keep a
portion of the street clear from vehicle obstruction. The purchase will
replace meter covers that are currently faded, tattered, or experiencing
severe wear and tear from reuse.
Page 49
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
As required by the City Charter, this item requests the City Council conduct a public
hearing on the 2022-27 Capital Improvement Program for purposes of receiving public
comments.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Budget and Research
Department.
Page 50
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request City Council approval of a resolution adopting a 2022-27 Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) for the City of Phoenix. This resolution does not appropriate or commit
any public funds, but represents an endorsement of the proposed capital
improvements and the five-year plan of expenditure as a reasonable and desirable
plan to be accomplished by the City. A five-year capital plan is considered a best
financial practice.
Summary
The Five-Year CIP is a plan for the replacement, expansion and improvement of city
infrastructure, facilities and technology used to deliver community services. It is
financed from pay-as-you-go funds, property tax and revenue supported bond
proceeds, federal, state and other participation funds, passenger facility charges,
customer facility charges, participation by other governmental entities in certain
projects, development impact fees, capital grants, capital reserves, solid waste
remediation funds and other capital funding sources.
The Preliminary Five-Year CIP was presented to the City Council on March 29, 2022.
The 2022-27 CIP proposed for adoption includes adjustments to reflect carryovers and
known cost and resource changes.
The City Charter requires that the Five-Year CIP be adopted by resolution following the
advertised public hearing, which this year will take place at the Formal meeting on
June 1, 2022.
Adoption of the resolution (Attachment A) does not commit any funds, but represents
an endorsement of the CIP as a desirable plan to be accomplished over the next five
years. The first year of the CIP is adopted by ordinance as part of the annual budget
adoption process, which provides the only authority to commit funds.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Budget and Research
Department.
Page 51
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION #####
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A 2022-27 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF PHOENIX.
WHEREAS the provisions of Section 18, Chapter XVIII, Phoenix City
Charter require that the City Manager submit to the City Council a five-year capital
improvement program; and
The City Manager having prepared a five-year program listing all capital
improvements proposed to be undertaken during the next ensuing fiscal years
beginning July 1, 2022, and ending June 30, 2027; and
Said programs having been submitted to the City Council and filed of
record under the title "Preliminary 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program," in the
office of the City Clerk; and
A public hearing on the program having been held on June 1, 2022, at
2:30 p.m. at the Council Chambers of the City of Phoenix, 200 West Jefferson, Phoenix,
Arizona; notice of the time, date and place of said hearing having been placed in the
official City newspaper and posted on the official bulletin boards not less than two
weeks prior to the hearings; and the City Council having considered all matters
appropriate thereto;
-1- Resolution #####
Page 52
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as
follows:
SECTION 1. That the proposed five-year capital improvement program of
all capital improvements to be undertaken by the City of Phoenix for the five next
ensuing fiscal years commencing July 1, 2022, and consisting in general of the following
items and amounts:
Program Five-Year Total
Arts and Cultural Facilities $902,000
Aviation 1,740,964,000
Economic Development 70,314,000
Environmental Programs 1,250,000
Facilities Management 101,809,000
Finance 4,700,000
Fire Protection 34,005,000
Historic Preservation & Planning 15,503,000
Housing 127,443,000
Human Services 600,000
Information Technology 145,712,000
Libraries 13,098,000
Neighborhood Services 9,594,000
Non-Departmental Capital 617,510,000
Parks, Recreation & Mountain Preserves 269,575,000
Phoenix Convention Center 185,073,000
Police Protection 50,482,000
Public Art Program 15,572,000
Public Transit 1,542,009,000
Regional Wireless Cooperative 30,005,000
Solid Waste Disposal 70,142,000
Street Transportation & Drainage 949,859,000
Wastewater 1,708,599,000
Water 2,072,965,000
Total $9,777,686,000
All as is more explicitly set forth in the document entitled "2022-2027
Capital Improvement Program" and in a section of the document entitled "The 2022-
-2- Resolution #####
Page 53
2023 Phoenix Detail Budget," to be submitted by the City Manager and filed with the
City Clerk, is adopted as the capital improvement program of the City.
SECTION 2. The adoption of this program is a statement of present goals
and objectives subject to actual annual appropriation by budget procedure and adoption
and to expenditure by regular fiscal payment ordinance.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of June, 2022.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Acting City Attorney
REVIEWED BY:
City Manager
-3- Resolution #####
Page 54
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
As required by the City Charter and State statute, this item requests the City Council
conduct a public hearing on the adoption of the tentative 2022-23 Annual Budget
ordinances (see Attachments A and B for additional information).
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Budget and Research
Department.
Page 55
ATTACHMENT A
Adoption of the Annual Tentative 2022-2023 Budget Ordinances
This report provides backup information to items on the June 1, 2022 Council Formal
agenda regarding adoption of the Tentative 2022-2023 Budget ordinances. These are
the annual steps required by City Charter and State Law.
State law requires adoption of the annual Tentative Budget ordinances, followed by two
consecutive weeks of publication of the adopted Tentative Budget in the legally
prescribed format. Detailed budget schedules prepared on forms provided by the State
Auditor General’s Office and Truth in Taxation notice in accordance with state law are
attached to this report.
Adoption of the Tentative 2022-2023 budget ordinances requires the following:
1. Holding a public hearing
2. Adoption of the Tentative 2022-2023 Budget ordinance. This ordinance adopts the
portion of the Tentative Budget financed from operating resources. It represents the
2022-2023 Budget approved by the City Council on May 17.
3. Adoption of the Tentative 2022-2023 Capital Funds Budget ordinance. This
ordinance adopts the portion of the Tentative Budget financed from capital funds and
is included in the first fiscal year of the 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program.
4. Adoption of the Tentative 2022-2023 Reappropriated Funds Budget ordinance. This
budget ordinance is required to rebudget funds that were contractually committed in
the prior fiscal year but not yet fully expended. Since budget appropriations expire
on June 30 of each fiscal year, this ordinance re-establishes the appropriations for
payment of vendors as goods and services are received.
For example, on September 8, 2021, the City Council awarded a contract to Combs
Construction Company, Inc. to provide design-bid-build services in support of the
Pinnacle Peak Road: 45th Avenue to 35th Avenue Paving and Storm Drain
Improvements (REBID) project. The amount of the contract was $9,858,936, which
was encumbered, or committed using the 2021-2022 Street Transportation Capital
funds budget appropriation. However, to-date payments on this contract have not yet
occurred and will extend into fiscal year 2022-2023. The contract amount is included
in the Reappropriated Funds ordinance to ensure the spending authority is in place
for future payments made on this contract during the 2022-2023 fiscal year.
REMAINING STEPS
Following this action, the Tentative 2022-2023 Budget information will be advertised for
two consecutive weeks in accordance with state law.
State law also requires adoption of the Final 2022-2023 Budget ordinances following the
two weeks of advertised publications of the adopted Tentative Budget. The City Charter
Page 56
requires Council adopt the budget on or before the last day of June each year. As a
result, adoption of the Final 2022-2023 Budget is scheduled for the June 15, 2022
Council Formal meeting. The June 15, 2022 actions will include the Final 2022-2023
Budget ordinance, the Final 2022-2023 Capital Funds Budget ordinance, and the Final
2022-2023 Reappropriated Funds Budget ordinance. Both state law and the City
Charter require holding public hearings prior to adoption of the Budget ordinances.
Also on the June 15, 2022 agenda there will be several items necessary to close out the
current fiscal year and prepare for the annual independent audit. A separate City
Council Report will be provided explaining these funding plan close-out items for the
June 15, 2022 agenda.
The 2022-2023 Property Tax Levy will be brought forward for adoption on July 1, 2022,
as state law requires this to occur at least 14 days after adoption of the Final Budget.
The City Charter requires adoption of the Property Tax Levy no later than the last
regularly scheduled meeting in July. Based on the May 17, 2022 City Council action,
the levy will reflect a total property tax rate of $2.1130 per $100 of assessed valuation.
Page 57
Attachment B - State Forms A through G and Truth
in Taxation Notice
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA
Summary Schedule of Estimated Revenues and Expenditures/Expenses
Fiscal Year 2022-23
(In Thousands)
FUNDS
S
c
Fiscal h Special Revenue Capital Projects Enterprise Reappropriation
Year General Fund Fund Debt Service Fund Fund Funds Available Funds Total All Funds
2022 Adopted/Adjusted Budgeted Expenditures/Expenses* E 1,621,668 2,188,944 129,714 1,157,566 1,686,195 2,341,651 9,125,738
2022 Actual Expenditures/Expenses** E 1,477,595 1,602,698 129,349 652,942 1,479,253 1,541,868 6,883,706
2023 Fund Balance/Net Position at July 1*** 185,378 861,430 100 926,698 856,018 2,246,442 5,076,066
2023 Primary Property Tax Levy B 199,194 199,194
2023 Secondary Property Tax Levy B 124,847 124,847
2023 Estimated Revenues Other than Property Taxes C 215,437 2,988,893 4,130 916,495 1,517,146 5,642,101
2023 Other Financing Sources D 1,000 2,223 150,000 5,432 158,655
2023 Other Financing (Uses) D
2023 Interfund Transfers In D 1,318,444 690,138 67,084 9,276 140,010 2,224,952
2023 Interfund Transfers (Out) D 140,023 1,885,285 17,989 120,144 2,163,441
Page 58
2023 Reduction for Amounts Not Available:
LESS: Amounts for Future Debt Retirement:
Future Capital Projects
Maintained Fund Balance for Financial Stability
2023 Total Financial Resources Available 1,779,431 2,657,399 196,161 1,984,480 2,398,462 2,246,442 11,262,375
2023 Budgeted Expenditures/Expenses E 1,779,431 2,225,305 196,061 1,820,794 1,777,044 2,246,442 10,045,077
EXPENDITURE LIMITATION COMPARISON 2022 2023
1. Budgeted expenditures/expenses $ 6,784,087 $ 7,798,635
2. Add/subtract: estimated net reconciling items 1,451,623 (748,587)
3. Budgeted expenditures/expenses adjusted for reconciling items 8,235,710 7,050,048
4. Less: estimated exclusions
5. Amount subject to the expenditure limitation $ 8,235,710 $ 7,050,048
6. EEC expenditure limitation $ 9,125,738 $ 10,045,077
* Includes Expenditure/Expense Adjustments Approved in the current year from Schedule E.
** Includes actual amounts as of the date the proposed budget was prepared, adjusted for estimated activity for the remainder of the fiscal year.
*** Amounts on this line represent Fund Balance/Net Position amounts except for amounts not in spendable form (e.g., prepaids and inventories) or legally or contractually required to be maintained
intact (e.g., principal of a permanent fund).
Arizona Auditor General's Office
SCHEDULE A Official City/Town Budget Forms
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA
Tax Levy and Tax Rate Information
Fiscal Year 2022-23
(In Thousands)
2021-22 2022-23
1. Maximum allowable primary property tax levy.
A.R.S. §42-17051(A) $ 193,314 $ 201,207
2. Amount received from primary property taxation in
the current year in excess of the sum of that
year's maximum allowable primary property tax
levy. A.R.S. §42-17102(A)(18) $
3. Property tax levy amounts
A. Primary property taxes $ 193,225 $ 201,207
B. Secondary property taxes 120,494 126,108
C. Total property tax levy amounts $ 313,719 $ 327,315
4. Property taxes collected*
A. Primary property taxes
(1) Current year's levy $ 191,294
(2) Prior years’ levies 915
(3) Total primary property taxes $ 192,209
B. Secondary property taxes
(1) Current year's levy $ 119,289
(2) Prior years’ levies 592
(3) Total secondary property taxes $ 119,881
C. Total property taxes collected $ 312,090
5. Property tax rates
A. City/Town tax rate
(1) Primary property tax rate 1.3055 1.2989
(2) Secondary property tax rate 0.8141 0.8141
(3) Total city/town tax rate 2.1196 2.1130
B. Special assessment district tax rates
Secondary property tax rates - As of the date the proposed budget was prepared, the
city/town was operating zero special assessment districts for which secondary
property taxes are levied. For information pertaining to these special assessment districts
and their tax rates, please contact the city/town.
* The 2022-23 planned primary and secondary levies are $201,206,519 and $126,108,420,
respectively. Historically, actual property tax collections have been slightly lower than the amount
levied. For 2022-23, actual collections for primary and secondary property taxes are estimated to
be $199,194,000 and $124,847,000, or 99% of the levy amount.
** Includes actual property taxes collected as of the date the proposed budget was prepared, plus
estimated property tax collections for the remainder of the fiscal year.
Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE B Official City/Town Budget Forms
Page 59
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA
Revenues Other Than Property Taxes
Fiscal Year 2022-23
(In Thousands)
ESTIMATED ACTUAL ESTIMATED
REVENUES REVENUES * REVENUES
SOURCE OF REVENUES 2021-22 2021-22 2022-23
GENERAL FUND
Intergovernmental
County Vehicle License Tax $ 79,100 $ 79,000 $ 83,100
Charges for services
Fire Emergency Transportation Services $ 33,500 $ 42,955 $ 44,313
Hazardous Materials Inspection Fee 1,500 1,500 1,500
Planning 1,497 1,792 1,828
Police 13,108 14,766 14,154
Street Transportation 6,481 9,107 6,831
Other Service Charges 21,644 22,180 25,258
Fines and forfeits
Moving Violations $ 5,949 $ 4,845 $ 4,760
Parking Violations 467 458 465
Driving While Intoxicated 450 612 612
Defensive Driving Program 1,375 1,405 1,405
Other Receipts 2,166 1,856 1,863
Interest on investments
Interest on investments $ 5,550 $ 3,550 $ 5,550
Contributions
SRP In-Lieu Taxes $ 2,010 $ 2,203 $ 2,203
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous $ 5,279 $ 7,182 $ 6,475
Parks and Recreation 4,093 4,669 5,722
Libraries 483 387 399
Cable Communications 9,600 9,200 9,000
Total General Fund $ 194,252 $ 207,667 $ 215,437
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Highway User Revenue Fund
Incorporated Cities Share $ 118,834 $ 121,428 $ 123,025
300,000 Population Share 30,126 30,815 31,474
Interest/Other 755 836 500
$ 149,715 $ 153,079 $ 154,999
Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE C Official City/Town Budget Forms
Page 60
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA
Revenues Other Than Property Taxes
Fiscal Year 2022-23
(In Thousands)
ESTIMATED ACTUAL ESTIMATED
REVENUES REVENUES * REVENUES
SOURCE OF REVENUES 2021-22 2021-22 2022-23
Excise Tax Fund
Local Taxes $ 547,397 $ 608,481 $ 629,254
Stormwater 5,087 5,097 5,148
Jet Fuel 744 817 929
Marijuana Sales Tax Earmarked for Public Safety Pension 11,976 12,248
License & Permits 5,571 5,853 5,878
State Sales Tax 197,945 223,359 227,155
State Income Tax 219,316 213,294 310,387
Neighborhood Protection 40,214 46,406 47,843
2007 Public Safety Expansion 80,428 92,813 95,686
Public Safety Enhancement 24,706 25,436 25,821
Parks and Preserves 40,214 46,406 47,844
Transportation 2050 274,395 316,830 326,455
Capital Construction 7,370 6,091 6,179
Sports Facilities 15,578 23,854 24,577
Convention Center 57,196 71,772 73,883
$ 1,516,161 $ 1,698,486 $ 1,839,289
Other Special Revenue Funds
Neighborhood Protection $ 405 $ 292 $ 292
2007 Public Safety Expansion 321 119 119
Parks and Preserves 1,852 1,012 891
Transportation 2050 27,973 25,071 38,157
Capital Construction 222 120 120
Sports Facilities 4,240 3,888 3,878
Development Services 71,428 80,028 81,725
Regional Transit 38,945 22,609 45,672
Community Reinvestment 5,863 6,296 6,045
Impact Fee Administration 525 737 761
Regional Wireless Cooperative 5,515 5,530 5,632
Golf 6,794 9,485 9,562
Court Awards 5,296 8,377 4,533
$ 169,379 $ 163,564 $ 197,386
Other Restricted Funds
Court Special Fees $ 851 $ 821 $ 814
Vehicle Impound Program 1,270 2,013 1,993
Other Restricted Funds 22,427 18,900 23,085
Affordable Housing Program 6,550 5,468 4,774
$ 31,098 $ 27,202 $ 30,666
Federal Funds
Public Housing $ 105,745 $ 127,299 $ 137,673
Human Services 86,581 153,407 76,011
Federal Transit Administration 240,756 183,616 96,562
Community Development 70,581 33,936 54,729
Criminal Justice/Public Safety 18,876 13,493 10,296
Other Federal & State Grants 508,465 171,531 391,284
$ 1,031,004 $ 683,282 $ 766,554
Total Special Revenue Funds $ 2,897,357 $ 2,725,612 $ 2,988,893
Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE C Official City/Town Budget Forms
Page 61
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA
Revenues Other Than Property Taxes
Fiscal Year 2022-23
(In Thousands)
ESTIMATED ACTUAL ESTIMATED
REVENUES REVENUES * REVENUES
SOURCE OF REVENUES 2021-22 2021-22 2022-23
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
Secondary Property Tax $ 4,397 $ 4,397 $ 4,130
Total Debt Service Funds $ 4,397 $ 4,397 $ 4,130
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
Bond Funds $ $ 672 $
Capital Grants 189,542 313,434 614,685
Capital Reserves 281
Customer Facility Charges 46,246 48,528 53,380
Federal, State and Other Participation 118,761 105,371 122,028
Impact Fees 46,851
Joint Ventures 34,721 36,199 35,670
Passenger Facility Charges 77,959 81,011 90,732
Solid Waste Remediation 20
Other Capital Funds 1
Total Capital Projects Funds $ 467,229 $ 632,368 $ 916,495
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Convention Center $ 18,800 $ 13,226 $ 17,802
Solid Waste 189,869 194,202 196,668
Aviation 412,547 516,966 508,516
Water System 487,696 484,368 525,269
Wastewater System 254,696 259,420 268,890
Total Enterprise Funds $ 1,363,608 $ 1,468,181 $ 1,517,146
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $ 4,926,843 $ 5,038,225 $ 5,642,101
* Includes actual revenues recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget was prepared, plus
estimated revenues for the remainder of the fiscal year.
Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE C Official City/Town Budget Forms
Page 62
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA
Other Financing Sources/
Fiscal Year 2022-23
(In Thousands)
OTHER FINANCING INTERFUND TRANSFERS
2022-23 2022-23
FUND SOURCES
GENERAL FUND
General Fund $ 1,000 $ $ 1,215,329 $ 131,396
Parks and Recreation 99,272
Library 3,843 3,047
Cable Communications 5,580
Total General Fund $ 1,000 $ $ 1,318,444 $ 140,023
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Excise $ $ $ $ 1,839,288
City Improvement 71,140 1,026
Neighborhood Protection 47,843 723
2007 Public Safety Expansion 95,686 1,559
Public Safety Enhancement 25,821 419
Parks and Preserves 47,845 205
Capital Construction 143 6,179
Court Awards 1
Transportation 2050 1,085 326,455 5,188
Development Services 21 5,261
Highway User Revenue 901 3,952
Sports Facilities 25,603 15,674
Regional Wireless Cooperative 6
Other Restricted 37 38,721 9,650
Community Reinvestment 1 4,845 2,066
Grant Funds 28 273
Total Special Revenue Funds $ 2,223 $ $ 690,138 $ 1,885,285
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
Secondary Property Tax $ $ $ 67,084 $
Total Debt Service Funds $ $ $ 67,084 $
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
Other Bonds $ 150,000 $ $ 1,026 $ 1,026
Capital Reserves 8,250
Customer Facility Charges 16,963
Total Capital Projects Funds $ 150,000 $ $ 9,276 $ 17,989
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Aviation $ 1,588 $ $ 17,063 $ 11,192
Water 1,889 20,970 47,190
Wastewater 1,205 28,093 45,897
Solid Waste 190 12,244
Convention Center 560 73,883 3,621
Total Enterprise Funds $ 5,432 $ $ 140,010 $ 120,144
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $ 158,655 $ $ 2,224,952 $ 2,163,441
Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE D Official City/Town Budget Forms
Page 63
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA
Expenditures/Expenses by Fund
Fiscal Year 2022-23
(In Thousands)
ADOPTED EXPENDITURE/
BUDGETED EXPENSE ACTUAL BUDGETED
EXPENDITURES/ ADJUSTMENTS EXPENDITURES/ EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES APPROVED EXPENSES* EXPENSES
FUND/DEPARTMENT 2021-22 2021-22 2021-22 2022-23
GENERAL FUND
General: $ $ $ $
General Government 168,223 2,540 168,234 204,617
Criminal Justice 39,858 1,580 40,820 43,390
Public Safety 999,730 998,546 1,088,575
Transportation 23,476 1,530 24,636 26,085
Community Development 29,344 1,260 30,151 36,748
Community Enrichment 29,069 1,800 30,410 35,006
Environmental Services 24,482 3,450 27,512 29,534
Contingencies 123,219 120,788
Unassigned Vacancy Savings (11,000) (20,000) (20,000)
Capital Budget 24,052 1,620 24,443 46,973
Parks and Recreation
Operating 108,229 105,591 117,261
Contingencies 945
Capital
Library
Operating 43,865 43,154 45,841
Capital 955 717 1,193
Cable Communications 3,169 270 3,380 3,420
Total General Fund $ 1,607,618 $ 14,050 $ 1,477,595 $ 1,779,431
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
$ $ $ $
Arizona Highway User Revenue
Operating 89,856 620 88,701 95,818
Capital 85,482 (620) 62,833 91,598
Capital Construction
Operating 140 3 140 140
Capital 20,380 (3) 7,647 25,398
City Improvement 70,421 29,790 98,239 70,114
Community Reinvestment
Operating 2,128 2,036 2,302
Capital 7,734 2,325 7,968
Court Awards
Operating 5,464 2,926 7,071
Capital
Development Services
Operating 74,906 74,085 82,400
Contingencies 7,000 8,000
Capital 4,451 1,343 15,755
Federal Community Development
Operating 58,187 29,301 47,109
Capital 12,394 5,599 7,619
Federal & State Grants
Operating 502,000 (138,045) 154,046 315,306
Capital 10,225 14,775 24,763 71,724
Federal Transit
Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE E Official City/Town Budget Forms
Page 64
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA
Expenditures/Expenses by Fund
Fiscal Year 2022-23
(In Thousands)
ADOPTED EXPENDITURE/
BUDGETED EXPENSE ACTUAL BUDGETED
EXPENDITURES/ ADJUSTMENTS EXPENDITURES/ EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES APPROVED EXPENSES* EXPENSES
FUND/DEPARTMENT 2021-22 2021-22 2021-22 2022-23
Operating 161,955 160,945 17,552
Capital 78,801 22,671 79,009
Golf Course
Operating 6,224 2,000 8,062 7,074
Capital 1,100 1,000 2,000
HOPE VI Grant
Operating 5,370 230 5,485 3,743
Capital 9,745 (230) 3,423 10,807
Human Services Grants 86,581 69,900 153,407 76,011
Neighborhood Protection
Operating 45,671 2,270 46,992 51,591
Capital
Other Restricted Funds
Fees and Contributions 66,468 63,199 60,396
Capital 12,718 9,827 12,862
Parks and Preserves
Operating 6,479 340 6,679 7,137
Capital 66,212 (340) 30,937 80,643
Public Housing
Operating 98,858 6,000 104,382 108,837
Capital 13,894 (6,000) 7,381 44,411
Public Safety Enhancement
Operating 30,482 30,134 32,115
Capital
Public Safety Expansion
Operating 96,706 96,621 106,664
Capital
Public Transit (RPTA)
Operating 24,998 6,390 41,378
Capital 13,961 3,867 13,002
Regional Wireless Cooperative 5,485 410 5,776 5,791
Sports Facilities
Operating 2,690 250 2,882 3,066
Contingencies 20,000 5,000
Capital 2,393 2,073 4,424
Transportation 2050
Operating 87,311 87,178 231,238
Contingencies 4,000 4,000
Capital 308,724 189,404 368,232
$ $ $ $
Total Special Revenue Funds $ 2,206,494 $ (17,550) $ 1,602,698 $ 2,225,305
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
$ $ $ $
Secondary Property Tax and G.O. 129,714 129,349 196,061
Total Debt Service Funds $ 129,714 $ $ 129,349 $ 196,061
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE E Official City/Town Budget Forms
Page 65
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA
Expenditures/Expenses by Fund
Fiscal Year 2022-23
(In Thousands)
ADOPTED EXPENDITURE/
BUDGETED EXPENSE ACTUAL BUDGETED
EXPENDITURES/ ADJUSTMENTS EXPENDITURES/ EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES APPROVED EXPENSES* EXPENSES
FUND/DEPARTMENT 2021-22 2021-22 2021-22 2022-23
$ $ $ $
Arts and Cultural Facilities 902 902
Aviation 222,906 104,644 378,631
Facilities Management 9,197 2,549 16,697
Finance 8,000 3,300 4,700
Fire Protection 25,870 3,582 22,944
Housing 11,949 2,891 13,134
Human Services 600 600
Information Technology 9,651 2,140 8,137
Libraries 4,666 4,839
Non-Departmental Capital 103,118 83,224 203,223
Parks, Recreation and Mtn Preserves 15,676 2,479 25,033
Phoenix Convention Center 55,000 51,274 158,600
Police Protection 24,412 12,410 20,982
Public Art Program 4,455 867 5,745
Public Transit 70,579 67,912 144,311
Regional Wireless Cooperative 6,001 379 6,001
Solid Waste Disposal 21,611 15,072 10,500
Street Transportation and Drainage 163,821 68,451 142,155
Wastewater 179,044 119,047 421,122
Water 275,108 (55,000) 112,720 232,538
Total Capital Projects Funds $ 1,157,566 $ $ 652,942 $ 1,820,794
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
$ $ $ $
Aviation
Operating 440,249 28,250 459,311 403,851
Contingencies 20,000 20,000
Capital 126,993 (28,250) 27,083 187,920
Convention Center
Operating 66,643 64,448 72,452
Contingencies 3,000 3,000
Capital 15,480 133 2,781
Solid Waste
Operating 185,874 183,771 180,798
Contingencies 1,000 1,000
Capital 11,278 5,724 20,478
Wastewater
Operating 187,351 3,500 189,376 202,742
Contingencies 12,500 12,500
Capital 71,659 67,884 90,162
Water
Operating 403,313 380,787 414,872
Contingencies 12,000 12,000
Capital 125,355 100,736 152,489
Total Enterprise Funds $ 1,682,695 $ 3,500 $ 1,479,253 $ 1,777,044
REAPPROPRIATION FUNDS
$ $ $ $
General
General Government 25,379 20,730 25,946
Criminal Justice 1,261 646 5,207
Public Safety 32,634 23,941 70,087
Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE E Official City/Town Budget Forms
Page 66
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA
Expenditures/Expenses by Fund
Fiscal Year 2022-23
(In Thousands)
ADOPTED EXPENDITURE/
BUDGETED EXPENSE ACTUAL BUDGETED
EXPENDITURES/ ADJUSTMENTS EXPENDITURES/ EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES APPROVED EXPENSES* EXPENSES
FUND/DEPARTMENT 2021-22 2021-22 2021-22 2022-23
Transportation 5,336 194 5,586
Environmental Services 21,400 (5,669) 12,893 29,356
Community Development 1,069 736 3,656
Community Enrichment 2,266 247 2,512 6,437
Capital Improvements 5,643 5,422 11,065 24,467
Library
Community Enrichment 5,886 4,028 8,136
Parks and Recreation
Community Enrichment 15,654 9,531 19,653
Cable Communications
General Government 177 73 308
Arizona Highway User Revenue
Street and Highway purposes 79,595 57,108 90,030
Aviation
Transportation 99,990 54,330 90,463
Capital Construction
Capital Improvements 8,874 2,804 7,564
City Improvement Operating
Debt Service 260 252
Community Reinvestment
Community Development 3,444 748 2,454
Court Awards
Criminal Justice 1,557 638 2,234
Development Services
Community Development 28,318 21,745 26,733
Federal and State Grants
Operating grants 8,801 5,269 53,079
Federal Community Development
Community Development 27,722 474 21,038
Federal Transit
Transportation 26,289 5,106 96,323
Golf
Community Enrichment 2,345 1,971 4,389
HOPE Grant
Community Development 2,711 54 4,989
Human Services
Community Enrichment 34,086 4,727 44,842
Neighborhood Protection
Public Safety 2,472 197 4,643
Other Restricted
Community Development 37,184 8,480 43,980
Parks and Preserves
Capital Improvements 33,415 24,375 34,019
Phoenix Convention Center
Community Enrichment 15,506 4,394 11,767
Public Housing
Community Development 22,138 165 29,067
Public Safety Enhancement Funds
Public Safety 59 25 34
Public Safety Expansion Funds
Public Safety 282 176 3,690
Regional Transit Authority
Transportation 45,499 31,730 36,066
Regional Wireless Cooperative
General Government 3,508 937 3,095
Secondary Property Tax
Debt Service 285
Solid Waste
Environmental Services 49,739 29,282 70,829
Sports Facilities
Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE E Official City/Town Budget Forms
Page 67
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA
Expenditures/Expenses by Fund
Fiscal Year 2022-23
(In Thousands)
ADOPTED EXPENDITURE/
BUDGETED EXPENSE ACTUAL BUDGETED
EXPENDITURES/ ADJUSTMENTS EXPENDITURES/ EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES APPROVED EXPENSES* EXPENSES
FUND/DEPARTMENT 2021-22 2021-22 2021-22 2022-23
Community Enrichment 5,785 3,678 3,488
Transportation 2050
Transportation 282,597 148,223 205,817
Wastewater
Environmental Services 89,437 59,078 111,921
Water
Environmental Services 117,200 87,050 190,455
Capital
1988 Parks, Recreation, Facilities, Library Bonds 5,322 3,326 2,202
2001 Educational, Youth and Cultural Facility Bonds 15 9 10
2001 Neighborhood Protection & Senior Center Bonds 34 4
2006 Affordable Housing & Neighborhood Bonds 131 82 82
2006 Parks & Recreation Bonds 5,240 3,275 1,927
2006 Police and Fire Protection Bonds 32 20 3,527
Aviation Capital 318,481 186,343 186,018
Capital Reserves 800 8,607
City Improvement 105,059 84,198 40,330
CPBC - Senior Lien Excise Tax 7,050 1,942 4,099
Development Impact Fees 34,822 21,957 23,241
Multi-City Wastewater Capital 43,204 29,250 50,207
Public Housing Capital 109 1,949
Regional Wireless Cooperative Capital 362 1
Solid Waste Capital 364 186 16,002
Streets Capital 53,418 39,661 48,154
Wastewater Capital 100,448 72,215 92,143
Water Capital 521,242 460,286 375,558
Total Reappropriation Funds $ 2,341,651 $ $ 1,541,868 $ 2,246,442
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $ 9,125,738 $ $ 6,883,706 $ 10,045,077
* Includes actual expenditures/expenses recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget was prepared, plus
estimated expenditures/expenses for the remainder of the fiscal year.
Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE E Official City/Town Budget Forms
Page 68
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA
Expenditures/Expenses by Department
Fiscal Year 2022-23
(In Thousands)
ADOPTED EXPENDITURE/
BUDGETED EXPENSE ACTUAL BUDGETED
EXPENDITURES/ ADJUSTMENTS EXPENDITURES/ EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES APPROVED EXPENSES* EXPENSES
DEPARTMENT/FUND 2021-22 2021-22 2021-22 2022-23
Community Development: $ $ $ $
Arizona Highway Users Revenue 15 15
Aviation 75 75 75
Community Development 68,938 (170) 33,097 53,115
Community Reinvestment 9,862 4,361 10,271
Convention Center 504 40 543 597
Development Services 78,554 74,733 97,903
Federal and State Grants 21,302 15,781 61,546
General 29,344 1,260 30,151 36,748
Hope VI 14,989 8,792 14,515
Neighborhood Protection 261 54 300
Other Restricted 13,904 12,177 17,199
Public Housing 112,652 111,667 153,218
Sports Facilities 677 409 2,763
Water 31 31 30
Department Total $ 351,109 $ 1,130 $ 291,872 $ 448,294
Community Enrichment: $ $ $
Arizona Highway Users Revenue 617 1,340 1,949 837
Aviation 6 4 40
Capital Construction 40 0 76
Community Development 1,370 170 1,535 1,373
Convention Center 60,788 (50) 43,215 57,090
Federal and State Grants 37,758 4,600 42,358 111,286
General 29,296 1,800 30,637 35,010
Golf Course 6,224 3,100 9,062 9,074
HOPE VI 126 115 34
Human Services Grants 86,581 69,900 153,407 76,011
Library 44,820 43,871 47,033
Other Restricted 3,907 5,930 9,806 3,398
Parks and Preserves 72,691 37,616 87,780
Parks and Recreation 108,229 105,591 117,261
Public Housing 100 97 31
Solid Waste 57
Sports Facilities 2,563 250 2,703 2,800
Transportation 2050 494 135 430
Wastewater 155 155 155
Water 470 257 535
Department Total $ 456,235 $ 87,040 $ 482,512 $ 550,310
Criminal Justice: $ $ $
Federal and State Grants
General 39,858 1,580 40,820 43,390
Other Restricted 3,265 2,361 2,988
Department Total $ 43,123 $ 1,580 $ 43,181 $ 46,378
Contingencies: $ $ $
Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE F Official City/Town Budget Forms
Page 69
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA
Expenditures/Expenses by Department
Fiscal Year 2022-23
(In Thousands)
ADOPTED EXPENDITURE/
BUDGETED EXPENSE ACTUAL BUDGETED
EXPENDITURES/ ADJUSTMENTS EXPENDITURES/ EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES APPROVED EXPENSES* EXPENSES
DEPARTMENT/FUND 2021-22 2021-22 2021-22 2022-23
Aviation 20,000 20,000
Convention Center 3,000 3,000
Development Services 7,000 8,000
General 123,219 120,788
Parks and Recreation 945
Solid Waste 1,000 1,000
Sports Facilities 20,000 5,000
Transportation 2050 4,000 4,000
Wastewater 12,500 12,500
Water 12,000 12,000
Department Total $ 203,664 $ $ $ 186,288
Environmental Services: $ $ $
Aviation 10 1
Capital Construction 70 70 70
Convention Center 10 0
Development Services 480 420 63
Federal and State Grants 362 35,000 35,289 13,909
General 39,429 2,120 38,595 50,174
Other Restricted 4,149 4,021 5,499
Solid Waste 181,431 173,815 185,603
Transportation 2050 10 2
Wastewater 186,566 181,955 217,604
Water 372,626 344,757 427,873
Department Total $ 785,114 $ 37,150 $ 778,926 $ 900,795
General Government: $ $ $
Arizona Highway Users Revenue 252 218 270
Aviation 1,186 987 838
Cable 3,169 270 3,380 3,420
Community Development 273 268 240
Convention Center 68 59 81
Court Awards 58 10 60 58
Development Services 323 275 189
Federal and State Grants 2,550 47,000 49,470 2,570
General 175,521 5,260 180,768 225,767
Other Restricted 2,424 1,261 2,201
Regional Wireless Cooperative 5,485 410 5,776 5,791
Solid Waste 493 453 442
Sports Facilities 159 159 159
Transportation 2050 290 260 98
Wastewater 900 760 750
Water 1,921 1,498 1,403
Department Total $ 195,071 $ 52,950 $ 245,652 $ 244,277
Public Safety: $ $ $
Court Awards 5,406 (10) 2,866 7,013
Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE F Official City/Town Budget Forms
Page 70
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA
Expenditures/Expenses by Department
Fiscal Year 2022-23
(In Thousands)
ADOPTED EXPENDITURE/
BUDGETED EXPENSE ACTUAL BUDGETED
EXPENDITURES/ ADJUSTMENTS EXPENDITURES/ EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES APPROVED EXPENSES* EXPENSES
DEPARTMENT/FUND 2021-22 2021-22 2021-22 2022-23
Federal and State Grants 34,222 31,896 29,525
General 1,001,310 998,546 1,092,155
Neighborhood Protection 45,410 2,270 46,938 51,291
Other Restricted 45,701 (5,930) 38,263 36,210
Public Safety Enhancement 30,482 30,134 32,115
Public Safety Expansion 96,706 96,621 106,664
Sports Facilities 1,685 1,685 1,769
Department Total $ 1,260,923 $ (3,670) $ 1,246,949 $ 1,356,741
Transportation: $ $ $
Arizona Highway Users Revenue 174,453 (1,340) 149,367 186,294
Aviation 478,694 (28,250) 378,626 489,625
Capital Construction 20,410 7,716 25,392
Federal and State Grants 30 4,000 4,016 15,618
Federal Transit Authority 240,756 183,616 96,561
General 23,476 1,760 25,236 27,685
Other Restricted 5,836 5,137 5,763
Transit - RPTA 38,959 10,257 54,380
Transportation 2050 395,252 (10) 276,184 598,942
Department Total $ 1,377,867 $ (23,840) $ 1,040,155 $ 1,500,261
Debt: $ $
Aviation 87,281 28,240 106,702 101,192
City Improvement 70,421 29,790 98,239 70,114
Convention Center 20,763 20,763 17,465
Secondary Property Tax 129,714 129,349 196,061
Solid Waste 15,227 15,227 15,174
Wastewater 71,389 3,500 74,389 74,395
Water 153,620 134,980 137,519
Department Total $ 548,415 $ 61,530 $ 579,650 $ 611,920
Non-Departmental $ $
Federal and State Grants 416,000 (213,870) 152,576
General (11,000) (20,000) (20,000)
Department Total $ 405,000 $ (213,870) $ (20,000) $ 132,576
$ $ $ $
Capital: 1,157,566 652,942 1,820,794
Department Total $ 1,157,566 $ $ 652,942 $ 1,820,794
$ $ $ $
Reappropriation: 2,341,651 1,541,868 2,246,442
Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE F Official City/Town Budget Forms
Page 71
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA
Expenditures/Expenses by Department
Fiscal Year 2022-23
(In Thousands)
ADOPTED EXPENDITURE/
BUDGETED EXPENSE ACTUAL BUDGETED
EXPENDITURES/ ADJUSTMENTS EXPENDITURES/ EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES APPROVED EXPENSES* EXPENSES
DEPARTMENT/FUND 2021-22 2021-22 2021-22 2022-23
Department Total $ 2,341,651 $ $ 1,541,868 $ 2,246,442
Total All Departments $ 9,125,738 $ $ 6,883,706 $ 10,045,077
* Includes actual expenditures/expenses recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the
proposed budget was prepared, plus estimated expenditures/expenses for the remainder of the fiscal year.
Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE F Official City/Town Budget Forms
Page 72
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA
Full-Time Employees and Personnel Compensation
Fiscal Year 2022-23
(In Thousands)
Total Estimated
Full-Time Employee Salaries Other Benefit Personnel
Equivalent (FTE) and Hourly Costs Retirement Costs Healthcare Costs Costs Compensation
FUND 2022-23 2022-23 2022-23 2022-23 2022-23 2022-23
GENERAL FUND
General 7,730 $ 694,773 $ 351,160 $ 106,989 $ 111,695 = 1,264,616
Library 388 19,381 4,881 2,902 3,741 30,904
Parks and Recreation 944 43,537 11,033 7,354 7,893 69,816
Cable Communications 20 1,863 606 230 399 3,098
Total General Fund 9,082 $ 759,553 $ 367,678 $ 117,475 $ 123,727 = 1,368,433
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Arizona Highway User Revenue 687 $ 39,065 $ 15,242 $ 9,085 $ 8,855 = 72,246
Community Reinvestment 3 303 97 28 61 489
Court Awards 13 13
Development Services 486 36,081 12,314 6,639 7,201 62,235
Federal Community Development 78 5,880 1,914 1,092 1,146 10,031
Federal and State Grants 180 11,742 4,782 1,842 2,175 20,542
Page 73
Golf Course 32 1,413 235 100 222 1,970
HOPE VI 14 776 187 175 174 1,313
Human Services 169 9,526 3,167 2,138 1,939 16,769
Neighborhood Protection 282 22,373 15,873 3,157 2,902 44,304
Other Restricted 111 9,206 3,109 1,482 1,900 15,698
Parks and Preserves 79 3,876 1,004 575 785 6,241
Public Safety Enhancement 266 18,478 9,661 2,811 2,919 33,869
Public Safety Expansion 684 60,309 39,226 8,435 7,543 115,512
Public Housing 66 4,598 1,540 927 893 7,958
Regional Wireless Cooperative 4 373 104 55 87 619
Transportation 2050 127 10,735 3,666 1,581 2,251 18,234
Total Special Revenue Funds 3,267 $ 234,734 $ 112,121 $ 40,122 $ 41,065 = 428,042
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Aviation 922 $ 57,749 $ 4,865 $ 12,703 $ 12,922 = 88,239
Convention Center 218 13,643 4,379 2,685 2,823 23,530
Solid Waste 630 37,765 12,767 8,678 7,045 66,255
Wastewater 341 22,642 1,629 4,732 4,634 33,637
Water 1,187 74,357 27,083 15,743 16,314 133,497
Total Enterprise Funds 3,298 $ 206,156 $ 50,723 $ 44,540 $ 43,738 = 345,158
TOTAL ALL FUNDS 15,646 $ 1,200,443 $ 530,523 $ 202,137 $ 208,531 = 2,141,633
Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE G Official City/Town Budget Forms
Tax Notice Explained
The accompanying Truth in Taxation notice is required by state law. The required
notice addresses the city’s primary property tax, which supports the General
Fund services such as police and fire, parks and recreation, libraries and senior
and community centers.
The city of Phoenix’s proposed primary property tax rate for 2022-23 of $1.2989
per $100 of assessed valuation is reduced from its 2021-22 rate of $1.3055 per
$100 of assessed valuation. However, overall increases in assessed valuation
result in a 2% increase in primary property taxes for the average city of Phoenix
property owner. Individual experiences may differ based on unique property
variances.
State law requires the notice below any time the average primary property tax bill
increases, even if the primary property tax rate is reduced.
The Truth in Taxation notice prescribed by state law does not address the city’s
secondary property tax. The city’s secondary property tax rate for 2022-23 will be
unchanged from its 2021-22 rate of $0.8141 per $100 of assessed valuation.
Secondary property taxes pay the bonded debt service for facilities like libraries,
police and fire stations, storm drains and parks.
For more information, call 602-262-4800, or visit phoenix.gov/budget.
Truth in Taxation notice publication dates and locations:
The Arizona Republic – May 31, 2022 and June 6, 2022.
Additionally included in published estimates of revenues and expenses:
The Record Reporter – June 6, 2022 and June 13, 2022.
Page 74
TRUTH IN
TAXATION HEARING
NOTICE OF TAX INCREASE
In compliance with section 42-17107, Arizona Revised Statutes, the city of
Phoenix is notifying its property taxpayers of the city of Phoenix’s intention
to raise its primary property taxes over last year’s level. The city of Phoenix
is proposing an increase in primary property taxes of $4,043,029 or 2.05%.
For example, the proposed tax increase will cause the city of Phoenix’s
primary property taxes on a $100,000 home to be $129.89 (total proposed
taxes including the tax increase). Without the proposed tax increase, the
total taxes that would be owed on a $100,000 home would have been
$127.28.
The proposed increase is exclusive of increased primary property taxes
received from new construction. The increase is also exclusive of any
changes that may occur from property tax levies for voter approved bonded
indebtedness or budget and tax overrides.
All interested citizens are invited to attend the public hearing on the tax
increase that is scheduled to be held June 15, 2022 at 2:30 p.m. at the city
of Phoenix Council Chambers, 200 W. Jefferson St.
Page 75
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
An ordinance (Attachment A) adopting the tentative estimates of the amounts
required for public expense for operating funds for the City of Phoenix for the fiscal
year 2022-23; adopting a tentative budget; setting forth the receipts and expenditures
and the amounts estimated as collectible for the fiscal year, and the amount proposed
to be raised by direct property taxation for primary and secondary purposes; giving
notice of the time and place for hearing taxpayers and for adoption of the budget and
fixing the tax levies.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This reflects the budget approved by the Council on May 17, 2022 and complies with
the requirements set forth in the City Charter and Code and State Statutes. Final
adoption is scheduled for June 15, 2022.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Budget and Research
Department.
Page 76
Attachment A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE.
ORDINANCE S-
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE TENTATIVE
ESTIMATES OF THE AMOUNTS REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC
EXPENSE OF OPERATING FUNDS FOR THE CITY OF
PHOENIX FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023; ADOPTING
A TENTATIVE BUDGET; SETTING FORTH THE
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES AND THE AMOUNTS
ESTIMATED AS COLLECTIBLE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR,
AND THE AMOUNT PROPOSED TO BE RAISED BY
DIRECT PROPERTY TAXATION FOR PRIMARY AND
SECONDARY PURPOSES; GIVING NOTICE OF THE TIME
AND PLACE FOR HEARING TAXPAYERS AND FOR
ADOPTION OF THE BUDGET AND FIXING THE TAX
LEVIES.
_____________
WHEREAS, by the provisions of the City Charter an ordinance adopting
the tentative budget for the fiscal year 2022-2023 is required to be adopted on or before
the last day of June, which date complies with A.R.S. §§ 42-17101, 17102, 17103, and
17104.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PHOENIX as follows:
Page 77
SECTION 1. That the statement and schedules hereinafter set forth and
hereby adopted for the purpose as hereinafter set forth as the tentative budget for the
SECTION 2. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
publish in the manner prescribed by law the estimates of expenditures, as hereinafter
set forth, together with a notice that the City Council will meet for the purpose of final
hearing by taxpayers and for adoption of the 2022-2023 annual budget for the City of
Phoenix on the 15th day of June 2022 at the hour of 2:30 p.m. in the City Council
Chambers of the City of Phoenix, 200 West Jefferson, Phoenix, Arizona, and will further
meet for the purpose of fixing tax levies on the 1st day of July 2022 at the hour of
10:00 a.m. in said Council Chambers.
SECTION 3. That the sums to be raised by primary taxation, as specified
herein, do not in the aggregate amount exceed that amount as computed pursuant to
A.R.S. § 42-17102(C).
SECTION 4. Upon the approval of the City Manager, funds may be
transferred within purposes set forth in Section 9.
SECTION 5. Upon recommendation by the City Manager and with the
approval of the City Council, expenditures may be made from the appropriation for
contingencies.
SECTION 6. In the case of an emergency, the City Council may authorize
the transfer of funds between purposes set forth in Section 9, if funds are available and
the transfer does not conflict with the limitations provided by law (A.R.S. § 42-17102).
-2- Ordinance S-
Page 78
SECTION 7. The City Council may authorize appropriation increases, if
funds are available, for purpose of expenditures that are exempt from limitation provided
in Article IX, Section 20, Constitution of Arizona.
SECTION 8. Money from any fund may be used for any of these
purposes set forth in Section 9, except money specifically restricted by State law or by
City Charter or City ordinances and resolutions.
SECTION 9. That the purposes of expenditures set forth in this section
are necessary for the conduct of the business of the government of the City of Phoenix
and such amounts are hereby adopted as tentative appropriations for the 2022-2023
fiscal year.
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA
PURPOSES OF PROPOSED PUBLIC EXPENSE
Amount of Appropriation
Purpose 2022-2023
GENERAL FUNDS
General Government $204,617,287
Public Safety 1,088,574,935
Criminal Justice 43,390,191
Transportation 26,084,633
Community Development 36,747,699
Community Enrichment 35,006,226
Environmental Services 29,534,469
Contingencies 120,788,000
Unassigned Vacancy Savings (20,000,000)
Capital Improvements 46,972,601
Total General Funds $1,611,716,041
PARKS AND RECREATION FUNDS
Parks and Recreation Operations and Maintenance. $117,261,331
-3- Ordinance S-
Page 79
Amount of Appropriation
Purpose 2022-2023
LIBRARY FUNDS
Library Operations and Maintenance, and Capital $47,033,427
Improvements.
CABLE COMMUNICATION FUNDS
Cable Communication Operations and Maintenance. $3,420,274
ARIZONA HIGHWAY USER REVENUE FUNDS
Street Maintenance, Major Street Improvements, Traffic $187,415,633
Improvements and other Street Improvements.
AVIATION FUNDS
Aviation Operations and Maintenance, Debt Service and $591,770,728
Capital Improvements.
Contingencies 20,000,000
Total Aviation Funds $611,770,728
CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUNDS
Capital Improvements in the Street Transportation and $25,538,533
Environmental Programs, and related Operations and
Maintenance.
CITY IMPROVEMENT FUND
Debt service payments for excise tax bond-funded capital $70,113,585
projects including Regional Wireless System infrastructure
improvements; downtown arena rehabilitation; 100 West
Washington Street facility renovations; LED streetlighting;
telephone system replacement; Fire Computer Aided
Dispatch System replacement; miscellaneous
redevelopment projects; other equipment, office, service
and training facilities and improvements.
-4- Ordinance S-
Page 80
Amount of Appropriation
Purpose 2022-2023
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FUNDS
Community Reinvestment Operations and Maintenance, $10,270,728
and Capital Improvements.
COURT AWARD FUNDS
Criminal Justice Programs. $7,070,773
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FUNDS
Development Services Operations and Maintenance, and $98,154,497
Capital Improvements.
Contingencies 8,000,000
Total Development Services Funds $106,154,497
FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUNDS
Community Development Program. $54,728,038
FEDERAL OPERATING TRUST FUNDS
Federal and State Grant Programs. $387,030,508
FEDERAL TRANSIT FUND
Transit Operations and Maintenance, and Capital $96,561,074
Improvements.
GOLF COURSE FUNDS
Golf Course Operations and Maintenance, and Capital $9,074,020
Improvements.
HOPE VI FEDERAL GRANT FUNDS $14,549,179
HUMAN SERVICES FEDERAL TRUST FUNDS
Human Services Program. $76,011,213
NEIGHBORHOOD PROTECTION FUNDS
Eligible Police, Fire, and Block Watch Operations and $51,591,250
Maintenance Expenditures Funded with Privilege License
and Excise Taxes in accordance with Ordinance G-3696.
-5- Ordinance S-
Page 81
Amount of Appropriation
Purpose 2022-2023
OTHER RESTRICTED FUNDS
Other Restricted Funds Operations and Maintenance, and $73,258,075
Capital Improvements.
PARKS AND PRESERVES FUNDS
Parks and Preserves Operations and Maintenance, and $87,779,802
Capital Improvement Expenditures Funded with Privilege
License and Excise Taxes in accordance with the Phoenix
Parks and Preserves initiative approved by the Phoenix
voters in a ballot measure on May 20, 2008.
PHOENIX CONVENTION CENTER FUNDS
Phoenix Convention Center Operations and Maintenance, $75,233,164
Debt Service, and Capital Improvements.
Contingencies 3,000,000
Total Phoenix Convention Center Funds $78,233,164
PUBLIC HOUSING FUNDS
Public Housing Operations and Maintenance, and Capital $153,248,583
Improvements.
PUBLIC SAFETY ENHANCEMENT FUNDS
Police, Fire, and Emergency Management Operations and $32,114,779
Maintenance Expenditures Funded with Privilege License
and Excise Taxes in accordance with Ordinance S-31877.
PUBLIC SAFETY EXPANSION FUNDS
Police and Fire Personnel and Service Expansion Funded $106,663,681
with Privilege License and Excise Taxes in accordance
with Ordinance G-4987.
REGIONAL TRANSIT FUNDS
Regional Transportation Operations and Maintenance, $54,380,428
and Capital Improvements.
REGIONAL WIRELESS COOPERATIVE FUNDS
Operations and Maintenance of the Regional Wireless $5,790,783
Cooperative.
-6- Ordinance S-
Page 82
Amount of Appropriation
Purpose 2022-2023
SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX FUNDS
Debt Service on and Early Redemption of Outstanding $196,061,471
Bonds and Long-Term Obligations.
SOLID WASTE FUNDS
Solid Waste Operations and Maintenance, Debt Service $201,276,071
and Capital Improvements.
Contingencies 1,000,000
Total Solid Waste Funds $202,276,071
SPORTS FACILITIES FUNDS
Sports Facilities Operations and Maintenance, and Capital $7,489,644
Improvements.
Contingencies 5,000,000
Total Sports Facilities Funds $12,489,644
TRANSPORTATION 2050 FUNDS
Transit and Streets Operations and Maintenance, and $599,469,953
Capital Improvement Expenditures Funded with Privilege
License and Excise Taxes in accordance with Ordinance
G-6051.
Contingencies 4,000,000
Total Transportation 2050 Funds $603,469,953
WASTEWATER SYSTEM FUNDS
Wastewater System Operations and Maintenance, Debt $292,903,678
Service and Capital Improvements.
Contingencies 12,500,000
Total Wastewater Funds $305,403,678
-7- Ordinance S-
Page 83
Amount of Appropriation
Purpose 2022-2023
WATER FUNDS
Water System Operations and Maintenance, Debt Service
and Capital Improvements. $567,360,081
Contingencies 12,000,000
Total Water Funds $579,360,081
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS 2022-2023 $5,977,841,025
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix on this 1st day of
June 2022.
____________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Acting City Attorney
REVIEWED BY:
City Manager
-8- Ordinance S-
Page 84
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
An ordinance (Attachment A) adopting the tentative Capital Funds Budget for the City
of Phoenix for the Fiscal Year 2022-23.
Summary
This adopts the tentative 2022-23 Capital Funds Budget for the fiscal year beginning
July 1, 2022, and ending June 30, 2023. The Capital Funds Budget will be funded by
property tax and revenue supported bond proceeds, federal, state and other
participation funds, passenger facility charges, customer facility charges, participation
by other governmental entities in certain projects, development impact fees, capital
grants, capital reserves, solid waste remediation funds and other capital funding
sources.
Final adoption is scheduled for June 15, 2022.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The 2022-23 Capital Funds Budget is included in the Five-Year Capital Improvement
Program resolution, also requested for Council approval on the June 1, 2022, Formal
Agenda and complies with requirements set forth in the City Charter and Code and
State Statutes.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Budget and Research
Department.
Page 85
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE S-#####
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE TENTATIVE CAPITAL
FUNDS BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF PHOENIX FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as
follows:
SECTION 1. The schedule set forth as Section 2 below is hereby adopted
as the tentative 2022-23 Capital Funds Budget for capital improvements to be made
from authorized property tax and revenue supported bond proceeds, nonprofit
corporation bond financing, federal and state participation funds, passenger facility
charges, customer facility charges, participation by other governmental entities in
certain projects, development impact fees, capital grants, capital reserves, solid waste
remediation funds and other capital funding sources, for the year beginning July 1,
2022, and ending June 30, 2023.
SECTION 2. This Council has determined and adopted the following
estimates of proposed Capital expenditure improvements for the various purposes
therein named for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022, and ending June 30, 2023.
-1- S-#####
Page 86
Appropriation
Amount
Purpose 2022-23
ARTS AND CULTURAL FACILITIES
2001 General Obligation Bonds $902,484
AVIATION
Aviation Bonds, Capital Grants, Passenger Facility Charges $378,631,498
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
Other Bonds, Other Capital $16,697,423
FINANCE
Other Bonds
AF $4,700,000
T
FIRE PROTECTION
Impact Fees, Other Bonds $22,944,422
HOUSING
Capital Grants $13,133,519
HUMAN SERVICES
R
2006 General Obligation Bonds
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Other Bonds
$600,000
$8,137,175
D
LIBRARIES
Impact Fees
NON-DEPARTMENTAL CAPITAL
Capital Grants, Customer Facility Charges, Federal, State
and Other Participation, Other Bonds, Passenger Facility
Charges
$4,839,000
$203,222,601
-2- S-#####
Page 87
Appropriation
Amount
Purpose 2022-23
PARKS, RECREATION & MOUNTAIN PRESERVES
Capital Grants, Capital Reserves, Impact Fees $25,032,924
PHOENIX CONVENTION CENTER
Other Bonds $158,600,000
POLICE PROTECTION
Capital Reserves, Impact Fees $20,981,646
PUBLIC ART PROGRAM
AF
Aviation Bonds, Other Bonds, Passenger Facility Charges,
Solid Waste Bonds, Wastewater Bonds, Water Bonds
$5,744,999
PUBLIC TRANSIT
T
Capital Grants, Transportation 2050 Bonds
REGIONAL WIRELESS COOPERATIVE
Other Cities' Share in Joint Ventures
$144,310,500
$6,001,000
R
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
Capital Reserves, Solid Waste Bonds, Solid Waste
Remediation
STREET TRANSPORTATION & DRAINAGE
$10,499,579
D
2006 General Obligation Bonds, Federal, State and Other
Participation, Impact Fees
WASTEWATER
Capital Grants, Impact Fees, Other Cities' Share in Joint
Ventures, Wastewater Bonds
$142,155,285
$421,121,602
-3- S-#####
Page 88
Appropriation
Amount
Purpose 2022-23
WATER
Capital Grants, Impact Fees, Other Cities' Share in Joint $232,537,847
Ventures, Water Bonds
TOTAL $1,820,793,504
AF
SECTION 3. Upon the approval of the City Manager, funds may be
transferred within purposes set forth in Section 2.
SECTION 4. The City Council may authorize appropriation increases, if
T
funds are available, for purpose of expenditures that are exempt from the limitation
provided in Article IX, Section 20, Constitution of Arizona.
R
D
-4- S-#####
Page 89
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of June, 2022.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Acting City Attorney
REVIEWED BY:
City Manager
-5- S-#####
Page 90
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
48682)
An ordinance (Attachment A) adopting the tentative Reappropriation Budget for items
of expenditure previously adopted as part of the 2021-22 Fiscal Year Operating and
Capital Funds Budgets of the City of Phoenix but remaining as unexpended funds as
of June 30, 2022.
Summary
This adopts the Tentative 2022-23 Reappropriated Funds Budget Ordinance. Council
approved contracts can span multiple fiscal years and budget appropriations expire on
June 30 of each fiscal year. This ordinance re-establishes the spending authority for
remaining payments to vendors on outstanding contract balances for goods and
services to be received during Fiscal Year 2022-23.
This complies with requirements set forth in the City Charter and Code and State
Statutes.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Budget and Research
Department.
Page 91
Attachment A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE.
ORDINANCE S-
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE TENTATIVE
REAPPROPRIATION BUDGET FOR ITEMS OF
EXPENDITURE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED AS PART OF
THE 2021-2022 FISCAL YEAR OPERATING AND CAPITAL
FUNDS BUDGETS OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX BUT
REMAINING AS UNEXPENDED FUNDS AS OF
JUNE 30, 2022.
_____________
WHEREAS, the City of Phoenix adopts, pursuant to state law, an annual
budget consisting of operating funds and capital funds for expenditure in each fiscal
year, and did so for the fiscal year 2021-2022, and
WHEREAS, the requirements of planning and contracting for the
acquisition of goods and services requires in many instances that the contracts for such
goods and services cannot be immediately executed; and
WHEREAS, there remains from said items budgeted for the fiscal year
2021-2022 substantial amounts represented by executed but unfulfilled contracts, and
WHEREAS, the City Charter directs that amounts may be expended by
the City only for goods and services actually received, and may not be expended in
advance of the acquisition of such goods and services, and
Page 92
WHEREAS, State Budget Law, A.R.S. § 42-17102 as amended, and as
interpreted by the Attorney General, demands that no expenditures be made for a
purpose not included in the budget, and no expenditure be made for any debt,
obligation or liability incurred or created in any fiscal year in excess of the amount
specified for each purpose in the budget for such fiscal year as finally adopted,
THEREFORE, it has become necessary to tentatively adopt a
reappropriation and supplemental budget for sums to be expended in the fiscal year
2022-2023 from funds budgeted for the fiscal year 2021-2022, but remaining
unexpended as of the close of the fiscal year on June 30, 2022.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PHOENIX as follows:
SECTION 1. That this Council has determined and adopted the following
tentative estimates of proposed capital and operating fund expenditures as hereinafter
set forth presenting a reappropriation of items previously budgeted for the fiscal year
2021-2022 but remaining unexpended at the close of said fiscal year, and likely to
remain unexpended by September 1, 2022, and representing amounts encumbered by
means of outstanding contracts as of the close of said fiscal year. Said amounts and the
purposes therefore are set forth in the schedule below as follows:
-2- Ordinance
Page 93
2022-2023 REAPPROPRIATED FUNDS
Fund Amount
OPERATING FUNDS:
General Funds
General Government $25,946,000
Criminal Justice 5,207,000
Public Safety 70,087,000
Transportation 5,586,000
Environmental Services 29,356,000
Community Development 3,656,000
Community Enrichment 6,437,000
Capital Improvements 24,467,000
Total General Funds $170,742,000
Parks and Recreation Funds
Parks and Recreation Operations and Maintenance, and $19,653,000
Capital Improvements.
Library Funds
Library Operations and Maintenance, and Capital $8,136,000
Improvements.
Cable Communication Funds
Cable Communication Operations and Maintenance. $308,000
Arizona Highway User Revenue Funds
Street Maintenance, Major Street Improvements, Traffic $90,030,000
Improvements and Other Street Improvements.
Aviation Funds
Aviation Operations and Maintenance, and Capital $90,463,000
Improvements.
-3- Ordinance
Page 94
Fund Amount
Capital Construction Funds
Capital Improvements in Street Transportation and $7,564,000
Drainage.
City Improvement Operating Funds
Debt Service Related Costs associated with City $252,000
Improvement.
Community Reinvestment Funds
Community Reinvestment Program. $2,454,000
Court Award Funds
Criminal Justice Program. $2,234,000
Development Services Funds
Development Services Operations and Maintenance, and $26,733,000
Capital Improvements.
Federal Community Development Funds
Community Development Program. $21,038,000
Federal Operating Trust Funds
Federal and State Grants. $53,079,000
Federal Transit Funds
Federal Transit Grant Program. $96,323,000
Golf Course Funds
Golf Course Operations and Maintenance, and Capital $4,389,000
Improvements.
HOPE VI Federal Grant Funds
HOPE VI Program. $4,989,000
-4- Ordinance
Page 95
Fund Amount
Human Services Federal Trust Funds
Human Services Program. $44,842,000
Neighborhood Protection Funds
Eligible Police, Fire and Blockwatch Operations and $4,643,000
Maintenance Expenditures Funded with Privilege License
and Excise Taxes in accordance with Ordinance G-3696.
Other Restricted Funds
Other Restricted Funds Operations and Maintenance, and $43,980,000
Capital Improvements.
Parks and Preserves Funds
Parks and Preserves Operations and Maintenance, and $34,019,000
Capital Improvement Expenditures Funded with Privilege
License and Excise Taxes in accordance with the Phoenix
Parks and Preserves initiative approved by the Phoenix
voters in a ballot measure on May 20, 2008.
Phoenix Convention Center Funds
Phoenix Convention Center Operations and Maintenance, $11,767,000
and Capital Improvements.
Public Housing Funds
Public Housing Operations and Maintenance, and Capital $29,067,000
Improvements.
Public Safety Enhancement Funds
Police, Fire, and Emergency Management Operations and $34,000
Maintenance Expenditures Funded with Privilege License
and Excise Taxes in accordance with Ordinance S-31877.
-5- Ordinance
Page 96
Fund Amount
Public Safety Expansion Funds
Police and Fire Personnel and Service Expansion Funded $3,690,000
with Privilege License and Excise Taxes in accordance
with Ordinance G-4987.
Regional Transit Authority Funds
Regional Transit Operations and Maintenance, and $36,066,000
Capital Improvements.
Regional Wireless Cooperative Funds
Regional Wireless Cooperative Operations and $3,095,000
Maintenance, and Capital Improvements.
Secondary Property Tax Funds
Debt Service on and Early Redemption of Outstanding $285,000
Bonds and Long-Term Obligations.
Solid Waste Funds
Solid Waste Operations and Maintenance, and Capital $70,829,000
Improvements.
Sports Facilities Funds
Sports Facilities Operations and Maintenance, and Capital $3,488,000
Improvements.
Transportation 2050 Funds
Transit and Streets Operations and Maintenance, and $205,817,000
Capital Improvement Expenditures Funded with Privilege
License and Excise Taxes in accordance with Ordinance
G-6051.
Wastewater System and Multi-City Wastewater Funds
Wastewater System Operations and Maintenance, and $111,921,000
Capital Improvements.
-6- Ordinance
Page 97
Fund Amount
Water Funds
Water System Operations and Maintenance, and Capital $190,455,000
Improvements.
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS:
1988 Parks, Recreation, Facilities, Library Bonds $2,202,000
2001 Educational, Youth and Cultural Facilities Bonds $10,000
Funds
2006 Affordable Housing & Neighborhood Bond Funds $82,000
2006 Parks & Recreation Bond Funds $1,927,000
2006 Police and Fire Protection Bond Funds $3,527,000
Aviation Capital Funds $186,018,000
Capital Reserve Funds $8,607,000
City Improvement Capital Funds $40,330,000
Civic Plaza Building Corporation Funds $4,099,000
Development Impact Fee Funds $23,241,000
Multi-City Wastewater Capital Funds $50,207,000
Public Housing Capital Funds $1,949,000
Regional Wireless Cooperative Capital Funds $1,000
Solid Waste Capital Funds $16,002,000
Streets Capital Funds $48,154,000
Wastewater Capital Funds $92,143,000
Water Capital Funds $375,558,000
TOTAL $2,246,442,000
-7- Ordinance
Page 98
SECTION 2. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
publish in the manner prescribed by law the estimates of these expenditures, as
hereinabove set forth, together with the notice that the City Council will meet for the
purpose of final hearing by taxpayers and for the adoption of said reappropriation
budget on the 15th day of June 2022 at the hour of 2:30 p.m. in the City Council
Chambers of the City of Phoenix, 200 West Jefferson, Phoenix, Arizona.
SECTION 3. In case of an emergency, the City Council may authorize the
transfer of funds between the purposes set forth in Section 1 above, if the funds are
available and the transfer does not conflict with the limitations provided by law under
A.R.S. § 42-17102.
SECTION 4. Money from any fund may be used for any of these purposes
set forth hereinabove, except money specifically restricted by state law or by City
Charter or City ordinances and resolutions.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of June 2022.
_________________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
-8- Ordinance
Page 99
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Acting City Attorney
REVIEWED BY:
City Manager
-9- Ordinance
Page 100
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Roadway Purposes (Ordinance S-48696)
Request for the City Council to accept and dedicate a deed and easements for
sidewalk, trail, public utility, and roadway purposes; further ordering the ordinance
recorded.
Summary
Accepting the property interests below will meet the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.
Easement (a)
Applicant: Sunbelt Rose Garden, L.P., its successor and assigns
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: 750 W. Rose Garden Lane
File: FN 220033
Council District: 1
Easement (b)
Applicant: Sunbelt Rose Garden, L.P., its successor and assigns
Purpose: Trail
Location: 750 W. Rose Garden Lane
File: FN 220033
Council District: 1
Easement (c)
Applicant: The Thomas A. Lyons and Tracy A. Lyons Family Trust date July 24, 2007,
and any amendments thereto, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 43 E. Griswold Road
File: FN 220030
Council District: 2
Page 101
Deed (d)
Applicant: The Thomas A. Lyons and Tracy A. Lyons Family Trust date July 24, 2007,
and any amendments thereto, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Roadway
Location: 43 E. Griswold Road
File: FN 220030
Council District: 2
Easement (e)
Applicant: Northern Apartments LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: 3031 W. Northern Ave.
File: FN 220036
Council District: 5
Easement (f)
Applicant: Mustang Villas LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: 5959 W. McDowell Road
File: FN 220020
Council District: 7
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning
and Development and Finance departments.
Page 102
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
48697)
Request for the City Council to accept an easement for vehicular non-access
purposes; further ordering the ordinance recorded.
Summary
Accepting the property interest below meets the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.
Easement (a)
Applicant: Northern Apartments LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Vehicular Non-Access
Location: 3031 W. Northern Ave.
File: FN 220036
Council District: 5
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Jeffrey Barton, Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and
the Planning and Development and Finance departments.
Page 103
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Located at 3112 E. Palo Verde Dr. (Ordinance S-48687)
Request the City Council amend Ordinance S-47841 for authorization to sell City-
owned property located at 3112 E. Palo Verde Dr. by direct sale.
Summary
Ordinance S-47841 authorized disposal of approximately 0.73 acres of City-owned
excess land located at 3112 E. Palo Verde Dr. via sealed bid solicitation.
Approximately 90 percent of the City-owned property is adjacent to one property to the
west, also known as 3122 E. Palo Verde Dr., and is improved with a driveway
accessing this adjacent property. This adjacent property is the only viable property for
assemblage based on configuration, access and utility.
As a condition of the sale, a slope easement for drainage on the east portion of the
City-owned excess land will be retained. The property will be sold based on appraised
value with the buyer responsible for all closing costs. All other conditions and
stipulations previously stated in the above referenced ordinance will remain the same.
Financial Impact
Revenue will be reflective of the appraised value.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Authorization to Dispose City-Owned Property (Ordinance
S-47841) on Aug. 25, 2015.
The Land Use and Livability Subcommittee recommended approval of this item on
May 19, 2021, by a vote of 2-0.
Location
3112 E. Palo Verde Dr.
Council District: 6
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton, Deputy City Manager Mario
Paniagua and the Street Transportation and Finance departments.
Page 104
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
and Operation Responsibilities for the Installation of Conduit for the City’s
Intelligent Transportation System, Sleeves for Water and Sewer Future
Service Lines, and Coordination of Traffic Signals at 51st and 43rd Avenues
on State Route 303 Loop (Ordinance S-48711)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement with the Arizona Department of Transportation to
define maintenance and operations responsibilities to accommodate connections to
the new City crossroads being constructed at 51st and 43rd avenues for the Taiwan
Semiconductor Manufacturing Company development.
Summary
The Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) defines the maintenance and operations
responsibilities for the installation of conduit for future City Intelligent Transportation
System, installation of sleeves for water and sewer for future City lines along 51st
and 43rd Avenues, and coordination of traffic signals. The IGA additionally defines
the responsibilities of each agency for future repairs, maintenance, damages,
permits and right-of way encroachments.
Contract Term
The terms conditions and provisions of this IGA shall remain in full force and effect
until completion of the project.
Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City.
Location
State Route 303 Loop between 51st and 43rd Avenues.
Council District: 1
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the City
Manager’s Office.
Page 105
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Award (Ordinance S-48679)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate
contracts with BrightView Landscape Services, Inc., Greenscapes Landcare, Inc.,
Legends Landscape Management, Inc., and Caretaker, Inc., to provide landscaping
services for citywide use. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse
all funds related to this item. The total value of the contracts will not exceed $17
million.
Summary
The City is contracting for landscaping services for over 350 City locations across the
Phoenix metropolitan service area. Landscaping services support the City Manager's
strategic plan to provide safe, efficient, sustainable, cost effective, well maintained,
and aesthetically pleasing facilities for the delivery of municipal services to residents
and visitors. Well maintained facilities preserve long-term investments and ensure
uninterrupted support services.
Procurement Information
A Request for Proposal procurement was processed in accordance with City of
Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10.
Seven vendors submitted proposals deemed responsive and responsible. An
evaluation committee of City staff evaluated those offers based on the following criteria
with a maximum possible point total of 1,000:
Qualifications and Experience (0-400 points)
Capacity (0-300 points)
Price (0-200 points)
Method of Approach (0-100)
Offerors selected for award are included Attachment A.
Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about June 1, 2022, for a one-year term with four one-
Page 106
year options to extend, in one-year increments.
Financial Impact
The aggregate contracts value will not exceed $17 million.
Funding is available in various Department budgets.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.
Page 107
Attachment A
Legistar File No.: 21-3301
Landscape Services Citywide – Requirements Contract RFP 22-108 –
Request for Award
After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to
the following vendor(s):
BrightView Landscape Services, Inc.
Group 1 - Primary - 787 points
Group 2 - Primary - 790 points
Group 3 - Primary - 729 points
Group 4 - Primary - 716 points
Group 5 - Primary - 735 points
Group 6 - Primary - 745 points
Group 7 - Primary - 782 points
Group 8 - Primary - 772 points
Group 9 - Primary - 766 points
Group 10 - Primary - 780 points
Group 11 - Secondary - 741 points
Group 12 - Secondary - 684 points
Group 13 - Secondary - 732 points
Group 14 - Primary - 744 points
Greenscapes Landcare, Inc.
Group 1 - Secondary - 703 points
Group 2 - Secondary - 694 points
Group 3 - Secondary - 658 points
Group 4 - Secondary - 685 points
Group 5 - Secondary - 703 points
Group 6 - Secondary - 703 points
Group 7 - Secondary - 703 points
Group 8 - Secondary - 703 points
Group 8 - Secondary - 703 points
Page 108
Group 9 - Secondary - 703 points
Legends Landscape Management, Inc.
Group 10 - Secondary - 722 points
Group 11 - Primary - 743 points
Group 12 - Primary - 743 points
Group 13 - Primary - 743 points
Group 14 - Secondary - 743 points
Caretaker, Inc., - Ancillary Services - 448 points
Page 109
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Amendment - RFA 16-230 (Ordinance S-48686)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to extend and allow additional
expenditures under Contract 143099 with Justice Trax, Inc. for the purchase of
Laboratory Management Information System maintenance and support for the Police
Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $151,000.
Summary
This contract will provide software support, maintenance, and software updates for the
Laboratory Management Information System (LIMS) utilized by the Police Department
Laboratory Services Bureau to track approximately 80,000 items of evidence, manage
lab requests, and write reports on completed analyses. The LIMS software has annual
licensing fees to allow continued use of the product and necessary software upgrades
and support. The additional funds will ensure operational needs of the Police
Department are not interrupted while a new procurement is completed.
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Contract Term
Upon approval the contract will be extended through June 30, 2023.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of $151,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $1,037,205. Funds are available in the Police Department’s
budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Laboratory Management Information System Maintenance and Support, Contract
143099, Ordinance S-42717 on June 22, 2016;
• Laboratory Management Information System Maintenance and Support, Contract
143099, Ordinance S-47733 on June 23, 2021.
Page 110
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.
Page 111
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
RFP 22-113 (Ordinance S-48689)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Sierra Tactical Auctions, Inc. to provide auctioneering services for unclaimed and
forfeited firearms on an as-needed basis for the Phoenix Police Department (PPD).
Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept funds related to this item.
Summary
This contract will provide auctioneering services to facilitate the sale of forfeited and
unclaimed firearms. The City is required to sell forfeited and unclaimed firearms to a
federally licensed firearms dealer pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-3105 and A.R.S. § 12-945,
respectively, unless the firearms are prohibited from being sold under federal or state
law. The contract will be paid through proceeds received from the sale of the City's
property and revenue will be deposited to the City's General Fund account.
Procurement Information
RFP 22-113 was conducted in accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10. There
were three offers received by the Procurement Division on March 11, 2022. The
notification was sent to 136 suppliers and was publicly posted and available for
download from the City's website.
The proposals were scored by a three-member evaluation panel on the following
criteria:
Experience and Qualifications: 400 points
Method of Approach: 350 points
Price: 250 points
After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following vendor:
Sierra Tactical Auctions, Inc: 912.5 total points
The Assistant Finance Director recommends that the offer from Sierra Tactical
Page 112
Auctions, Inc. be accepted as the highest scored, responsive, and responsible offer
most advantageous to the City.
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about June 1, 2022, for a five-year term with no options to
extend.
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value of the revenue generated for the City of Phoenix is
approximately $750,000, with estimated annual revenues of $150,000. No public funds
will be expended.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton, Assistant City Manager Lori
Bays and the Police and Finance departments.
Page 113
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
48691)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to authorize additional
expenditures not to exceed $40,000 under Contract 143068 with EnvisionWare, Inc.
and further request authorization to extend the term of the contract through June 21,
2023 for the continued use of software licenses and support for public computing and
printing and the e-Commerce system for the Library Department. Further request
authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
additional expenditures will not exceed $40,000.
Summary
EnvisionWare, Inc. software manages public use computers and customer self-service
for 17 library locations, as well as an on-line e-Commerce system that allows for library
customers to pay their library fees online with a credit card. Through the use of these
software applications, the Library Department is able to minimize the number of staff
required to manage customer access to over 1,000 public computers, accurately
recover costs for public printing services, and allow customers to pay library fees
online. The extension and additional funds will allow time for a new procurement
process to be completed.
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Contract Term
Upon approval, the contract term will be extended through June 21, 2023.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of $40,000 in additional funds, the revised total contract value will not
exceed $176,800. Funds are available in the Library Department's budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Page 114
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Library
Department.
Page 115
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Contract - City of Tucson 12-0471(B) (Ordinance S-48692)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 146072 with Panasonic System Communications Company (PCS) and
Mobile Concepts Technology LLC (MCT) to extend the contract term. Further request
to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional
expenditures will not exceed $5,415,800.
Summary
These contracts provide Panasonic Toughbooks, tablets, accessories and services to
all City departments, primarily Police, Fire, and Water Services Departments. The
devices are used to help employees collect, organize and transfer data faster, more
efficiently, and in real-time. The devices allow police officers to run license plates, scan
fingerprints and check records car side so they never leave a subject unattended.
Purchases of replacement Toughbooks and equipment vehicle installations have
continued to rise due to staffing level demands in all departments. Extending the
contracts will allow additional time for Procurement to complete the solicitation
process.
Contract Term
Upon approval, the contract term will be extended through July 31, 2023.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of $5,415,800 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $19,443,800. Funds are available in the various departments'
budgets.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Panasonic Toughbooks, Tablets, Accessories and Services - Requirements Contract,
Contract 146072, Ordinance S-43767 on June 28, 2017
• Panasonic Toughbooks, Tablets, Accessories and Services - Requirements Contract,
Contract 146072, Ordinance S-47667 on June 16, 2021
Page 116
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.
Page 117
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
(Ordinance S-48702)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a one time
purchase with Farber Specialty Vehicles Inc. to provide a bookmobile for the Library
Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total value of the one time purchase will not exceed $400,000.
Funding will be provided by the City's allocation of American Rescue Plan Act funds.
Summary
This one time purchase will provide a bookmobile specialty vehicle. The bookmobile
will offer library materials and provide services, such as library card sign ups, library
programs and access to some technologies. The bookmobile customization options
include: book shelving with removable library book carts, moveable furniture that can
be used to accommodate a variety of library programming needs, media outlets and
storage and promotional material kiosks. This vehicle will support the Library's efforts
to provide services to under served communities by visiting community gathering
places, schools and assisted living centers.
Procurement Information
In accordance with AR 3.10, standard competition was waived as a result of an
approved Determination Memo based on the following reason: Special Circumstance
without Competition. Farber Specialty Vehicles Inc. is the premier custom specialty
vehicle manufacturer with the ability to provide customized bookmobiles based on a
library's specific needs.
Contract Term
This is a one time purchase to be completed on or about May 31, 2023.
Financial Impact
The total contract value will not exceed $400,000.
Funding is available from the City's allocation of American Rescue Plan Act funds.
Page 118
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Library
Department.
Page 119
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Diversion Program (Ordinance S-48704)
Request authorization for an extension of an existing contract for one-year with
Catholic Charities Community Services, Inc. (Catholic Charities) for operation of the
Prostitution Diversion program. Further request authorization for the City Controller to
disburse funds related to this item.
Summary
The Prosecutor's Office Prostitution Diversion Program provides and monitors
rehabilitation services that focus on support, education, and treatment for participants
who have been involved in prostitution. Both the community and offender benefit when
the offender is rehabilitated. The City benefits by saving the costs the City would
otherwise incur to prosecute and incarcerate the offender. In 2020-21, the City saved
$217,705 in jail costs.
In February 2017, the City issued a request for proposal (RFP) to seek offers from
outside organizations to operate the City's Prostitution Diversion Program. Catholic
Charities was the sole organization to respond to the RFP. Catholic Charities' proposal
was reviewed by an evaluation committee. The committee determined the proposal
satisfied all requirements and Catholic Charities was highly qualified to provide the
program services. Catholic Charities has agreed to the additional one-year extension
with no changes to their program costs. The Law Department will utilize the extension
period to conduct a study of the program and prepare a new RFP.
Contract Term
The contract will be for a one-year extension beginning July 1, 2022, through June 30,
2023.
Financial Impact
The Law Department budget has allocated funding in the amount of $231,845.96.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
On June 17, 2020, City Council adopted Ordinance S-46756 authorizing the City
Manager, or his designee, to exercise the option in the original contract to extend the
Page 120
existing contract for two years through June 30, 2022, with funding not to exceed
$231,845.96 per year and further authorized the City Controller to disburse funds
related to this item.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Prosecutor's Office.
Page 121
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Support of the Human Services Business and Workforce Development Division
(Ordinance S-48699)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to convert two temporary full-
time positions to regular full-time positions in the Human Services Department. No
General Fund dollars are requested to support this request. Workforce Innovation and
Opportunity Act (WIOA) grant funds are available.
Summary
The request is to convert two temporary Workforce Development Specialist positions,
currently funded under the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Jobs-
Plus Initiative Program ending on June 30, 2022, and the Choice Neighborhoods Grant
ending on June 30, 2024, to regular full-time positions. To continue the delivery of no
cost training/education, job search and support services to City of Phoenix Housing
Department residents at the Marcos de Niza and Aeroterra public housing properties,
the Human Services Department is requesting that two temporary full-time positions be
converted to regular full-time prior to the end of the grant cycle.
Financial Impact
The costs for these positions for Fiscal Year 2022-23 is estimated to be $192,380. No
General Fund dollars are requested to support this request. WIOA grant funds are
available in the Human Services Department’s budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Human Services
and Housing departments.
Page 122
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Action Association (Ordinance S-48706)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with the Arizona Community Action Association dba Wildfire to accept local utility
assistance funds in an amount not to exceed $384,124 for the period of July 1, 2022,
through June 30, 2023. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept and
the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. There is no impact to the
General Fund.
Summary
Funds provided to the City of Phoenix through this agreement will be used to assist
low-income individuals and families by removing barriers to self-sufficiency through
utility bill assistance. This funding will allow the City of Phoenix to provide financial
assistance to approximately 1,070 households.
Contract Term
The contract term is one year beginning July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023.
Financial Impact
Funding for Fiscal Year 2022-23 will be provided by various local funding sources (
Attachment A). There is no impact to the General Fund.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Human Services
Department.
Page 123
Attachment A
FY 23 Fund Allocations
Fund Source
Utility, Repair, Replace, Deposit (URRD) $ 74,130.00
APS Crisis Bill Assistance $ 92,960.00
Southwest Gas LIEC Bill Assistance $ 40,414.00
Southwest Gas Energy SHARE Bill Assistance $ 56,900.00
Salt River Project (SRP) Bill Assistance $ 119,720.00
$ 384,124.00
Page 124
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
in the Salt River Project Business Demand Program (Ordinance S-48701)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Enel X North America, Inc., and enroll in the Salt River Project Business Demand
Program. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept all funds related to
this item. There is no financial obligation to the City of Phoenix.
Summary
The Salt River Project (SRP) Business Demand Program compensates customers for
reducing electrical load during demand response events, most commonly during peak
hours as needed. Enel X North America, Inc. is contracted through SRP to administer
the program and provide compensation to enrolled customers. During the course of
this agreement, participating departments will receive compensation of $60 per kW for
reducing electrical load at specific sites during a demand response event. At contract
signing, only accounts from the Water Services Department will be included, however,
it is anticipated that accounts from other departments will be added in the future.
Contract Term
The term of this agreement is for five years.
Financial Impact
There is no cost to the City to enter into this agreement. Based on the electrical load
anticipated to be reduced, staff estimates this agreement may generate between
$5,000 and $20,000 annually for the Water Services Department. Once enrolled,
departments will receive compensation each month of the participating program year.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters, the Water Services
Department, and the Office of Sustainability.
Page 125
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Services in the Metro District (Ordinance S-48698)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Community Alliance LLC (Consultant) and Concord Wilshire Capital, LLC (Developer),
or its designee, for Consultant to provide community organizing services for the Metro
District, an area bounded by Peoria Avenue to the north, Interstate 17 to the east,
Dunlap Avenue to the south, and 31st Avenue to the west. Further request
authorization for the City Treasurer to accept funds and the City Controller to disburse
funds related to this item.
Summary
Metrocenter Mall, which permanently closed in June 2020, is the largest vacant
commercial retail building in the City. This closing reduced activity from the general
public and has made the mall and surrounding area an inviting target for vagrancy,
graffiti, trespassing, litter and crime. The Neighborhood Services Department's open
cases with violations in the area have tripled since 2018 and, according to Phoenix
Police Department data, various forms of crime have also increased in the area since
2018. Cases of arson have more than tripled while commercial robberies and motor
vehicle thefts have doubled. Due to the increase of crime, the City Council included the
mall and surrounding area in its 27th Avenue Corridor Community Safety and Crime
Prevention Plan.
Staff believes the area is in critical need of building capacity to combat crime and blight
as well as positive promotion. Developer, the prospective buyer of Metrocenter Mall for
redevelopment, shares the City’s public safety concerns and is willing to fund 50
percent of the costs to build this capacity for the surrounding community.
To launch services quickly, staff identified a consultant with relevant experience and
knowledge of the area. In 2021, Ms. Shannon McBride, principal of the 19 North
Community Alliance (19 North), led community organizing efforts in this area and
formed a group called the Metro District Community Collaboration (MDCC). Ms.
McBride also has five years' experience delivering similar services in the nearby 19
North neighborhood. The MDCC consisted of area businesses and property owners
and Ms. McBride engaged them to market and brand the Metro District and collaborate
Page 126
on public safety matters; however, a consistent funding source for these services on
an ongoing basis had not been identified.
If approved, Community Alliance LLC, an affiliate of 19 North, will provide the following
services in the Metro District to enhance the effectiveness of the Crime Prevention
Plan and better position the area for future redevelopment:
1. Enhance Public Safety - proactively engage the community to combat blight, litter,
graffiti, trespassing and other conditions negatively impacting safety in the area.
2. Business Assistance - promote the general welfare of businesses in the area and
work with stakeholders to raise awareness of businesses in the area through events
and marketing efforts.
3. Building Relationships - serve as the conduit for connecting businesses and
property owners with one another and with external agencies.
Procurement Information
In compliance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, an exception to the procurement
process was approved to select this vendor. A direct selection was made due to the
urgent need to initiate these services on a short-term basis while staff conducts a
formal procurement process for a longer-term contract.
Contract Term
If approved, the term of this contract will begin on or about June 24, 2022, for a one-
year term with no renewal options.
Financial Impact
This contract will not exceed $75,000. The City will pay the full value to the Consultant
and the Developer will pay the City fifty percent of the cost ($37,500). Upon receipt of
the Developer's funds, the City's share will not exceed $37,500. Funding for the City’s
share is available in the Downtown Community Reinvestment Fund (DCRF) and
funding from the Developer will be returned to the DCRF.
Location
The Metro District Community Collaboration focus area is bounded by Peoria Ave. to
the north, Interstate 17 to the east, Dunlap Ave. to the south and 31st Ave. to the west.
Council District: 1
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Community
and Economic Development Department.
Page 127
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Development, LLC (Ordinance S-48700)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend the Redevelopment
and Purchase Agreement, City Contract 145544-0 (Agreement) with Metrowest
Development, LLC (Developer) to modify performance benchmarks as needed to allow
for completion of three city-owned parcels located between 2nd and 3rd avenues, on
the north side of McKinley Street in downtown Phoenix. There is no expense impact as
a result of this action.
Summary
In June 2015, the Community and Economic Development Department issued a
Request for Proposals (RFP) for the disposition and redevelopment of three
Neighborhood Services Department-owned parcels located between 2nd and 3rd
avenues, on the north side of McKinley Street (Site). On July 1, 2016, the City Council
authorized the City Manager to enter into the Agreement for the sale and
redevelopment of the Site through Ordinance S-42761 (Ordinance) and in August 2017
the Developer opened escrow for the transfer of the two parcels. In May 2017, the City
Council authorized modifications to the Agreement to allow additional time to complete
negotiations, and further granted an extension in October 2018 to modify the
performance benchmarks of the Agreement.
Developer was the successful proposer and was awarded the contract. The Developer
chose to develop the site in two phases: the West Phase with approximately 94 market
-rate units in a five-story podium apartment building with below grade parking, and the
East Parcel with six for sale three-story attached single-family homes. Staff finalized
the disposition of the West Phase of the project in November 2018 through
conveyance of the Special Warranty Deed and the Developer completed construction
in late 2020.
On August 25, 2021, the City Council authorized modifications to the Agreement to
allow additional time to commence construction on the East Phase property due to
significant delays and interruptions from the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as extensive
utility work related to the West Phase that prevented construction of the six single-
family attached homes. This amendment extended the commencement of construction
Page 128
date to Feb. 25, 2022. With utility work underway and the approval of the first building
permits, construction has now commenced on the project.
The Developer's Escrow Officer has since moved to a new company and transfer of
the escrow money for this project to the new title agency is required. The new title
agency also requires updates to the insurance terms for the project. To allow additional
time to complete the escrow transfer and the necessary insurance updates, the
Developer has requested an extension to complete the purchase of the site, and for
the completion of construction for the East Phase. This amendment will extend the
deadline for completion of site purchase to six months after City Council Action, and an
additional two years from the transfer of the property action to complete construction.
Metrowest is an established local developer with approved building permits for the
attached single-family homes and is ready to continue with construction upon the
modification of the performance benchmarks.
Financial Impact
There is no expense impact as a result of this action.
Concurrence/Previous City Council Action
The City Council approved Ordinance S-42761 on July 1, 2016.
Location
808 N. 2nd Ave. and 801 N. 3rd Ave.
Council District: 7
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Ginger Spencer and Alan Stephenson
and the Community and Economic Development and Neighborhood Services
departments.
Page 129
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
(Ordinance S-48705)
Request to authorize the City Manager or his designee to amend the Management and
Promotion Agreement, City Contract No. 131850-MPA (MPA), to modify definitions of
Gross Revenue to exclude infrastructure costs of new signage in the Legends
Entertainment District. All other terms of the MPA will remain. There is no expense
impact as a result of this action.
Summary
In 2011, The City of Phoenix entered into the MPA with the Jefferson Street Signage
District, LLC, dba Legends Entertainment District (Legends). This contract granted
Legends rights to install signs of various types at specific identified locations in an area
generally between Jefferson Street and Washington Street, and between 1st Street
and 7th Street. In exchange for the right to place signage on certain City buildings and
for an initial investment of $2 Million for installation of the original infrastructure, the
City receives Minimum Annual Guaranteed payments that total the greater of $350,000
per year or fifteen percent of the gross revenues. In addition to the payments, the City
also is granted access to unsold signage assets.
In 2018, the Jefferson Street Master Sign Plan was expanded with the addition of
Block 23, and then expanded again in 2021 with the addition of the Adeline apartment
building creating new opportunities for signage within the district. Legends partners
Phoenix Block 23, LLC. and Phoenix 24 Jefferson street Investors, LLC. have invested
in the construction of new sign infrastructure and the revenue from the new signs will
initially be used to recoup these costs. A total of six (6) signs have been installed
between the two buildings. The structure of the MPA would require Legends to pay the
City a portion of the revenue from the new signs that is dedicated to paying off the
initial investment. Once infrastructure costs have been recovered, revenue from the
new signs will be considered Gross Revenue, with fifteen percent paid to the City.
Financial Impact
Once construction and installation costs of the new signs are recouped by revenue
generated by the signs, the City will receive fifteen percent of the gross revenues for
the new signs. There is no expense impact as a result of this action.
Page 130
Concurrence/Previous City Council Action
The City Council approved Ordinance S-37850 on May 18th, 2011.
Location
Generally between Jefferson Street and Washington Street, and between 1st Street
and 7th Street.
Council District: 7 and 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Ginger Spencer and Inger Erickson,
and the Community and Economic Development and Phoenix Convention Center
Departments.
Page 131
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Immunization Services (Ordinance S-48712)
Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
agreement with the Arizona Department of Health Services to accept funds to
immunize children and adults residing in the City of Phoenix. Authorization also is
requested for the City Treasurer to accept, and for the City Controller to disburse, all
related funds.
Summary
The Arizona Department of Health Services (AZDHS) Arizona Immunization Program
Office strives to meet national immunization goals outlined by the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention. The Fire Department will work to enhance program
stewardship and accountability for all publicly-purchased vaccine in support of the
Vaccines for Children Program (VFC) and the Vaccines for Adults Program (VFA),
provide vaccines to children and adults in accordance with recommendations of the
CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), assess and improve
immunization coverage levels for children and adults, assure access to vaccines for
eligible populations in Arizona, and prevent and control Vaccine-Preventable Diseases
(VPD). AZDHS will provide the Phoenix Fire Department Immunization Program with
reimbursement at a rate of $25.00 per hour for immunization screening and database
services.
Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years, commencing on July 1, 2022, and ending on
June 30, 2027.
Financial Impact
The Fire Department will be reimbursed by AZDHS at a rate of $25.00 per hour; the
aggregate reimbursement over the life the contract will depend on the number of
immunization clinics hosted.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.
Page 132
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Contract - Professional Services Agreement (Ordinance S-48688)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
ACC Consulting, LLC to provide airport Federal Aviation Administration concessions
consultant services for the Aviation Department for an aggregate five-year contract
term. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item. The aggregate contract value will not exceed $560,000.
Summary
As a large hub primary airport, Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX) is
required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to have an Airport Concession
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) program to ensure PHX
concessionaires meet federal compliance requirements and abide by the City's
employee retention requirements. The City is required to submit its ACDBE program
and overall goals to the FAA every three years as a condition of eligibility for FAA
financial assistance. To develop triennial ACDBE goals, the City requires contractors to
evaluate and develop goals based on the analysis of available opportunities and
qualified ACDBE companies available to participate. Development of the triennial goal
includes gathering comparative data from similar projects, cooperation with FAA civil
rights officers, and organizing stakeholder participation meetings.
Procurement Information
The Aviation Department issued competitive solicitation RFP 22-003 for PHX FAA
concessions consultant services in 2022 pursuant to Administrative Regulation 3.10.
No offers were received and, as a result, the solicitation was canceled. The results of a
post-solicitation survey allowed the Aviation Department to determine that it is in the
best interests of the City to pursue a contract with the incumbent contractor, ACC
Consulting, LLC.
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, a Special Circumstances
Determination Memo was approved to enter into a contract with ACC Consulting, LLC.
Contract Term
The five-year contract term will begin on or about July 1, 2022.
Page 133
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $560,000.
Funding is available in the Aviation Department's budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board recommended RFP 22-009 for approval on Nov.
18, 2021 by a vote of 7-0.
The Transportation, Infrastructure, and Planning Subcommittee recommended the
request to issue approval of RFP 22-009 on Dec. 15, 2021 by a vote of 3-0.
The City Council approved Request to Issue RFP 22-009 on Jan. 5, 2022.
Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 3400 E. Sky Harbor Blvd.
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and Inger Erickson,
and the Aviation and Equal Opportunity Departments.
Page 134
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Purchase of Fixed Route Transit Service for Fiscal Year 2022-23 (Ordinance S-
48707)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 143071 with the Regional Public Transportation Authority for the purchase
of bus transit services operated by this agency within Phoenix for Fiscal Year 2022-23.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The funding for Fiscal Year 2022-23 will not exceed $10,567,317.
Summary
Transit services are customarily purchased and sold between regional transit agencies
where adding service or continuing an existing bus route is most economical. Each
Fiscal Year (FY), the City determines the level of service to be operated within its
boundaries and executes an amendment to its Service Agreement with the Regional
Public Transportation Authority (RPTA) to authorize funding for that FY’s service.
In FY 2022-23, RPTA will provide the following fixed route bus service within Phoenix:
Routes 30 (University Drive); 45 (Broadway Road); 56 (Priest Drive); 61 (Southern
Avenue); 77 (Baseline Road); 108 (Elliot Road/48th Street); 140 (Ray Road); and 156
(Chandler Boulevard). The City also sells service to RPTA on various routes.
At the end of each FY, the City and RPTA assess the actual miles operated, gross
costs incurred, federal funds credited (for preventative maintenance), and fare
revenues collected. The City and RPTA then reconcile the difference between the
original estimates and actual costs through a credit memo or billing, as applicable.
Financial Impact
The anticipated number of annual fixed route miles for FY 2022-23 is 1,464,771 miles
at a cost of $11,729,924. The total estimated fare box revenue is $304,547, the total
estimated preventive maintenance credit is $764,985, and the estimated advertising
revenue is $93,075. The total estimated net cost for RPTA's billing to the City is
$10,567,317.
Funding is available in the Public Transit Department’s Operating budget using the
Transportation 2050 Fund.
Page 135
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved RPTA Service Agreement 143071 (Ordinance S-42474) on
April 20, 2016.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Public Transit
Department.
Page 136
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
48708)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to
agreements: 147281 with the Gila River Indian Community; 150473 with the City of
Glendale; and 150638 with the Regional Public Transportation Authority, for the
purchase of Phoenix's fixed-route bus services by these agencies and the funding of
Phoenix's Dial-a-Ride services with regional transportation funds managed by
Regional Public Transportation Authority for Fiscal Year 2022-23. Further request to
authorize the City Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller to disburse, all funds
related to these amendments.
Summary
Phoenix's Public Transit Department has existing agreements with these agencies for
the provision of Phoenix-operated fixed-route bus services on the following routes:
· Gila River Indian Community (GRIC) - Route 51;
· City of Glendale - Routes 51, 59, 60, 67, 80, 83, 90 and 186; and
· Regional Public Transportation Authority (RPTA) - Routes 3, 17, 29, 41, 50, 59, 67,
70, 80, 83, 106, 138, 154 and 170.
These amendments establish the Fiscal Year 2022-23 cost estimates for the fixed-
route bus services provided to these agencies by Phoenix, plus Phoenix’s Dial-a-Ride
services funded by regional funds.
Financial Impact
There is no cost to Phoenix. Each agency will pay Phoenix for these services. Below
are the projected costs for each respective agency in Fiscal Year 2022-23:
GRIC
Gross Cost of Service: $1,059,025
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funding Credit to GRIC: $37,843
Farebox Revenue: $37,459
Net GRIC Cost (Revenue to Phoenix): $983,723
Page 137
City of Glendale
Gross Cost of Service: $4,567,673
ARPA Funding Credit to Glendale: $159,020
Farebox Revenue: $305,879
Net Glendale Cost (Revenue to Phoenix): $4,102,774
RPTA
Gross Cost of Fixed Route Bus Service: $16,933,207
Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act Funding Credit to RPTA:
$5,495
ARPA Funding Credit to RPTA: $522,092
Farebox Revenue: $983,634
Net Fixed Route Bus Service Cost: $15,421,986
Net Dial-a-Ride Cost (Revenue to Phoenix): $18,712,519
Net Combined RPTA Cost (Revenue to Phoenix): $34,134,505
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Public Transit
Department.
Page 138
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Build Services - ST85100339 (Ordinance S-48685)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to accept Combs Construction
Company, Inc. as the lowest-priced, responsive and responsible bidder and to enter
into an agreement with Combs Construction Company, Inc. for Design-Bid-Build
Services for the 35th Avenue and Harrison Street Union Pacific Railroad Crossing
project. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item. The fee for services will not exceed $457,570.
Summary
The purpose of this project is to enhance the safety of the Union Pacific Railroad
Company crossing at the intersection of 35th Avenue and Harrison Street. The
roadway improvements are at the intersection on both sides of the railroad tracks.
Combs Construction Company, Inc.’s services include, but are not limited to:
installation of new concrete medians, curbs, gutters, sidewalks and ramps, and
pavement restoration.
Procurement Information
The selection was made using an Invitation for Bids procurement process set forth in
section 34-201 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. Two bids were received on March 1,
2022 and were sent to the Equal Opportunity Department for review to determine
subcontractor eligibility and contractor responsiveness in demonstrating
responsiveness to Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program requirements.
The Opinion of Probable Cost and the one lowest responsive, responsible bidder are
listed below:
Opinion of Probable Cost: $290,397
Combs Construction Company, Inc.: $457,570
Bidders who were deemed non-responsive are listed below, in alphabetical order:
Shada, Inc. dba Benchmark Construction, LLC
Page 139
Although the bid exceeds the Opinion of Probable Cost by more than 10 percent, it has
been determined the bid represents a fair and reasonable price for the required work
scope. Additionally, the bid award amount is within the total budget for this project.
Contract Term
The term of the agreement is 180 calendar days from issuance of the Notice to
Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of
the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of
the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.
Financial Impact
The agreement value for Combs Construction Company, Inc. will not exceed
$457,570, including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.
This project will utilize federal funds and is subject to the requirements of 49 Code of
Federal Regulations Part 26 and the U.S. Department of Transportation DBE Program.
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and
approve funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.
Location
35th Avenue and Harrison Street
Council District: 7
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Street
Transportation Department, and the City Engineer.
Page 140
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Services - 4108JOC201 (Ordinance S-48690)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a master
agreement with URW, LLC dba United Right-of-Way, to provide Street (Right-of-Way)
Landscape Maintenance 2-Step Job Order Contracting services for the Street
Transportation Department. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to
the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as
provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
The fee for services will not exceed $12.5 million.
Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical; water; sewer; natural gas; telecommunications; cable
television; railroads; and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize
inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City
Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real
property.
Summary
URW, LLC dba United Right-of-Way's services will be used on an as-needed basis to
provide Street (Right-of-Way) Landscape Maintenance Job Order Contracting services
Citywide within established City Right-of-Way. Additionally, URW, LLC dba United
Right-of-Way will be responsible for fulfilling Small Business Enterprise program
requirements.
The Scope of Work is focused on Street Right-of-Way/properties and may include:
· Repair and install irrigation systems;
· Herbicide/pesticide applications;
· Graffiti removal;
· Planting, pruning and removal of landscape;
Page 141
· Knowledge and ability to install trees including staking and tying; and
· Coordinate traffic control per City of Phoenix Requirements.
Procurement Information
The selection was made using a two-step qualifications and price-based selection
process set forth in section 34-604 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In
accordance with A.R.S. section 34-604(H), the City may not publicly release
information on proposals received or the scoring results until an agreement is
awarded. One firm submitted proposals and is listed below.
Selected Firm
Rank 1: URW, LLC dba United Right-of-Way
Contract Term
The term of the master agreement is for up to five years, or up to $12.5 million,
whichever occurs first. Work scope identified and incorporated into the master
agreement prior to the end of the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may
extend past the termination of the master agreement. No additional changes may be
executed after the end of the term.
Financial Impact
The master agreement value for URW, LLC dba United Right-of-Way will not exceed
$12.5 million, including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute job order
agreements performed under this master agreement for up to $2 million each. In no
event will any job order agreement exceed this limit without Council approval to
increase the limit.
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department’s Operating budget. The
Budget and Research Department will review and approve funding availability prior to
issuance of any job order agreement. Payments may be made up to agreement limits
for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the agreement
termination.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Street
Transportation Department, and the City Engineer.
Page 142
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Interstate 10 Freeway - ST85160018 (Ordinance S-48693)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a Construction
License with Salt River Project for work associated with a City of Phoenix Street
Lighting project. Further request the City Council to grant an exception pursuant to
Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the documents pertaining to this
transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability provisions that otherwise
would be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18.
Summary
The City is installing streetlights on 35th Avenue from Roosevelt Street to Interstate 10
Freeway, and the purpose of this license is to allow the City to install five new
streetlights that will parallel Salt River Project irrigation facilities. This work is in
conjunction with City Project ST85160018.
Contract Term
The term of the Construction License is one year, effective when the City begins
construction, expected to be June 2022.
Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City of Phoenix for this license.
Location
35th Avenue, Roosevelt Street to Interstate 10 Freeway.
Council District: 4
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.
Page 143
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Traffic Signal Upgrade - ST89340638 (Ordinance S-48694)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a Construction
License with Salt River Project for work associated with a City of Phoenix Traffic Signal
project. Further request the City Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix
City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction
of indemnification and assumption of liability provisions that otherwise would be
prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18.
Summary
The City is upgrading all traffic signals, equipment and sidewalk ramps at the
intersection of 27th Avenue and Camelback Road, and the purpose of this license is to
allow the City to install three signal conduits that will cross under and one pole with a
pull box that will parallel Salt River Project irrigation facilities. This work is in
conjunction with City Project ST89340638.
Contract Term
The term of the Construction License is one year, effective when the City begins
construction, expected to be June 2022.
Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City of Phoenix for this license.
Location
27th Avenue and Camelback Road.
Council Districts: 4 and 5
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.
Page 144
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Morgan (Ordinance S-48703)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a non-exclusive,
revocable license to Santa Fe Pacific Partners Limited Partnership Kinder Morgan to
install, operate, maintain, and repair gas pipeline facilities in, under, over, and across
public rights-of-way in the City, subject to terms and conditions contained in the license
and Phoenix City Code. Further request to authorize expiration of this authorization if
the licensee does not sign the license within 60 days of Council approval.
Summary
The license will be for a period of 15 years, contain appropriate insurance and
indemnification provisions, require a performance bond and security fund, provide for
terms of transfer and revocation, and provide for compensation for the commercial use
of public rights-of-way while permitting the City to manage the right-of-way.
Contract Term
The license is for a 15-year Gas Pipeline License.
Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City. Per Phoenix City Code, licensee will pay an
annual fee to the City based on a formula using linear footage and the Consumer Price
Index.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.
Page 145
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Services - 4108JOC206 (Ordinance S-48709)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a master
agreement with DLC Resources, Inc., to provide city-maintained Freeway (Right-of-
Way) Landscape Maintenance Job Order Contracting services for the Street
Transportation Department. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to
the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as
provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
The fee for services will not exceed $12.5 million.
Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical; water; sewer; natural gas; telecommunications; cable
television; railroads; and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize
inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions that otherwise would be prohibited by Phoenix City
Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real
property.
Summary
DLC Resources, Inc.'s services will be used on an as-needed basis to provide city-
maintained Freeway (Right-of-Way) Landscape Maintenance Job Order Contracting
services within established non-City Right-of-Way. Additionally, DLC Resources, Inc.
will be responsible for fulfilling Small Business Enterprise program requirements.
The Scope of Work is focused on landscaping in Freeway Right-of-Way that is
maintained by the City per an Intergovernmental Agreement with the Arizona
Department of Transportation (ADOT), and may include:
· Repair and/or restoration of irrigation systems;
· Herbicide/pesticide applications;
Page 146
· Graffiti removal.
· Planting, pruning and removal of landscape;
· Clear-cut fire line breaks and other pruning/debris removal in washes with limited
access in accordance with Section 404 (Clean Water Act);
· Repair and/or replace concrete pedestrian pathways and miscellaneous concrete
flat work.
· Repair and/or install various types of fencing and traffic control; and
· Coordinate traffic control per ADOT and City of Phoenix requirements.
Procurement Information
The selection was made using a two-step qualifications and price based selection
process set forth in section 34-604 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In
accordance with A.R.S. section 34-604(H), the City may not publicly release
information on proposals received or the scoring results until an agreement is
awarded. One firm submitted a proposal and is listed below.
Selected Firm
Rank 1: DLC Resources, Inc.
Contract Term
The term of the master agreement is for up to five years, or up to $12.5 million,
whichever occurs first. Work scope identified and incorporated into the master
agreement prior to the end of the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may
extend past the termination of the master agreement. No additional changes may be
executed after the end of the term.
Financial Impact
The master agreement value for DLC Resources, Inc. will not exceed $12.5 million,
including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute job order
agreements performed under this master agreement for up to $2 million each. In no
event will any job order agreement exceed this limit without Council approval to
increase the limit.
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department’s Operating budget. The
Budget and Research Department will review and approve funding availability prior to
issuance of any job order agreement. Payments may be made up to agreement limits
for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the agreement
termination.
Page 147
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Street
Transportation Department, and the City Engineer.
Page 148
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Pump Station 5ED-B1- Engineering Services - WS85508002 (Ordinance S-48680)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Entellus, Inc., to provide Engineering Services that include study, design, and
possible construction administration and inspection services for the 24-Inch Water
Main: Cave Creek Road and Desert Peak Parkway to Booster Pump Station 5ED-B1
project. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreement as
necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below, and
for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The fee for services will
not exceed $2.93 million.
Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize
inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions that otherwise would be prohibited by Phoenix City
Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real
property.
Summary
The purpose of this project is to install approximately 30,000 feet of new 24-inch water
transmission main from Cave Creek Road and Desert Peak Parkway to connect to an
existing 54-inch transmission main near Booster Pump Station 5ED-B1. Services will
include an alignment study, design, and possible construction administration and
inspection.
Entellus Inc.'s services include, but are not limited to:
· Gather and review information to conduct alignment study, including providing
survey of the proposed pipeline alignment, researching property ownership,
verifying geographic contour, requesting and reviewing as-built's and utility maps
Page 149
etc.;
· Prepare easement documents for the proposed pipeline alignment;
· Attend meetings with various entities and provide assistance as needed, such as
easement acquisition, right-of-way coordination, and regulatory comments
resolution;
· Draft Method of Planned Operation for shut-downs and attend City shut-down
operational meetings;
· Provide services, as needed, for environmental/archeological assessments, aerial
topography, geotechnical services, land survey and mapping, construction
easements;
· Drainage associated with the project; and
· Other duties as assigned.
Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Five firms submitted proposals
and are listed below.
Selected Firm
Rank 1: Entellus, Inc.
Additional Proposers
Rank 2: Carollo Engineers, Inc.
Rank 3: Dibble & Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Rank 4: Project Engineering Consultants, Ltd.
Rank 5: Ritoch-Powell & Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from issuance of the Notice to Proceed. Work
scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term may
be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.
Financial Impact
The agreement value for Entellus, Inc. will not exceed $2.93 million, including all
subconsultant and reimbursable costs.
Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement Program
Page 150
budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.
Location
Cave Creek Road and Desert Peak Parkway
Council District: 2
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Karen Peters and Mario Paniagua,
the Water Services Department, and the City Engineer.
Page 151
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
(Ordinance S-48683)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Clear Creek Associates, LLC to provide groundwater modeling consulting services
for the Water Services Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed
$765,000.
Summary
The purpose of this agreement is to provide groundwater modeling consulting services
required for obtaining a Designation of Assured Water Supply (DAWS) from the
Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). The requirements of the DAWS
process have not been fully determined by ADWR, therefore Clear Creek will help to
support the City of Phoenix by analyzing previous DAWS requirements to produce new
information critical for obtaining the DAWS. Furthermore, this effort will not only include
groundwater modeling to address ADWR requirements but will also provide vital
components for the City's well permitting compliance using Well Impact-Well Spacing
Studies and the required analytical model THWells.
Procurement Information
In accordance with AR 3.10, standard competition was waived as a result of an
approved Determination Memo based on Special Circumstances without Competition.
The database that manages the data supply and demand statistics was created by
Clear Creek Associates and the City of Phoenix. Both the numerical model and
database are closely interlinked so that simulations and projections can be easily
created. It would be ineffective, time-consuming, and not cost effective to teach other
consultants how this numerical model works as the institutional knowledge is
proprietary about the model and database upgrades that were accomplished by Clear
Creek Associates.
Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about June 1, 2022, for a three-year term with two one-
year options to extend.
Page 152
Financial Impact
The total agreement value will not exceed $765,000.
Funding is available in the Water Services Department Operating budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.
Page 153
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
WS85400007 (Ordinance S-48684)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Entellus, Inc., to provide Engineering Services that include assessment,
inspection, cleaning, and design services, and possible construction administration
and inspection services for the Concrete Reservoir Program project. Further request to
authorize execution of amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-
approved expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The fee for services will not exceed $1.5 million.
Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code for 42-20 to authorize
inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions that otherwise would be prohibited by Phoenix City
Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real
property.
Summary
The purpose of this project is to maintain the program's 10-year schedule plan and use
the schedule to coordinate necessary assessment, inspection, and cleaning activities
with Water Services Department Operations staff. Entellus, Inc. will also be
responsible for preparing necessary documentation related to reservoir shutdowns for
23 concrete reservoirs.
Entellus, Inc.'s services include, but are not limited to: program planning and
management; assessment, inspection, and cleaning; Arizona Department of Water
Resources dam safety inspection; design services; and miscellaneous support
services.
Page 154
Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Four firms submitted proposals
and are listed below.
Selected Firm
Rank 1: Entellus, Inc.
Additional Proposers
Rank 2: Black & Veatch Corporation
Rank 3: HDR Engineering, Inc.
Rank 4: Gannett Fleming, Inc.
Contract Term
The term of the agreement is three years from issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.
Financial Impact
The agreement value for Entellus, Inc. will not exceed $1.5 million, including all
subconsultant and reimbursable costs.
Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Karen Peters and Mario Paniagua,
the Water Services Department, and the City Engineer.
Page 155
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Risk - Construction Services Amendment - WS85230052 (Ordinance S-48695)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 151260 with Sundt Construction, Inc. to provide additional Construction
Services for the Val Vista Water Treatment Plant Rehabilitation 2018 project. Further
request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreement as necessary within
the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional fee for services
included in this amendment will not exceed $892,301.
Summary
The purpose of this project is to perform rehabilitation services at the Val Vista Water
Treatment Plant (WTP). The Val Vista WTP is located on the south side of the Arizona
Canal in the City of Mesa and has the capacity to treat 220 million gallons of water per
day. The Water Services Department anticipates rehabilitation, replacement, or new
construction of the following treatment systems which may include, but are not limited
to: Chemical Feed Stations, East and West Plant Bar Screens, Solid Handling Facility
Polymer Feed System, Sludge Collectors, East Plant Inlet Electrical Building-
Switchgear, East Plant Sedimentation Basins 1-8 Launders, Ferric Chloride Bulk
Storage Tanks, and East and West Plant Filters 1-8 Rebuild and Granular Activated
Carbon Conversion.
This amendment is necessary for Sundt Construction, Inc. to provide additional
services which include, but are not limited to: ferric chemical system, including pump
room and containment area chemical resistant coatings, process controls changes
including tank level indication, program logic controls upgrades and pressure sensor
alteration; and the east inlet 5kV building feeder wire replacement, arc flash testing
and Neta testing for alterations made to electrical gear. This amendment will provide
additional funds to the agreement.
Contract Term
The term of the agreement amendment is 183 calendar days from issuance of the
Notice to Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to
the end of the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the
Page 156
termination of the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of
the term.
Financial Impact
· The initial agreement for Construction Services was approved for an amount not to
exceed $29.5 million, including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.
· Change Order 1 was approved for an amount not to exceed $1,503,257, including
all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.
· This amendment will increase the agreement by an additional $892,301, for a new
total amount not to exceed $31,895,558, including all subcontractor and
reimbursable costs.
Funding for this amendment is available in the Water Services Department's Capital
Improvement Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately
review and approve funding availability prior to execution of any amendments.
Payments may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services,
which may extend past the agreement termination.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Preconstruction Services Agreement 147880 (Ordinance S-44756) on June 20,
2018; and
· Construction Services Agreement 151260 (Ordinance S-46190) on Nov. 20, 2019;
and
· Construction Services Agreement 151260 - Amendment (Ordinance S-48217) on
Jan. 5, 2022.
Location
Val Vista Water WTP
Council District: Out of City
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Karen Peters and Mario Paniagua,
the Water Services Department, and the City Engineer.
Page 157
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
of 35th Avenue and Thunderbird Road
Plat: 210101
Project: 18-2299
Name of Plat: 35th Avenue and Thunderbird
Owner: FNS Ventures I, LLC, Francis and Sons I, LLC
Engineer: Bruce R Heyse, RLS
Request: A Two Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: April 26, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Northeast corner of 35th Avenue and Thunderbird Road
Council District: 1
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 158
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Avenue
Plat: 220010
Project: 21-2880
Name of Plat: Aster Ridge
Owner(s): K Hovnanian at Aster Ridge, LLC
Engineer(s): James A. Loftis, RLS
Request: A 177 Lot Residential Subdivision Plat
Reviewed by Staff: May 7, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Generally located North of Anthem Way and East of 43rd Avenue.
Council District: 1
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 159
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Mountain Avenue and Central Avenue
Plat: 200609
Project: 19-1352
Name of Plat: Elevate on Central
Owner: TSALM Services, LLC
Engineer: Robert A. Johnston, RLS
Request: A 58 Lot Attached Single-Family Planned Residential Development
Reviewed by Staff: May 13, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Generally located at the northwest corner of South Mountain Avenue and Central
Avenue.
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 160
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
and Elliot Road
Plat: 210110
Project: 19-796
Name of Plat: Isola at 202 & Elliot
Owner: Isola Elliot, LLC; Miller 160, LLC; Amed Partners, LLC
Engineer: Mitchell H. Ragsdale, RLS
Request: A 6 Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: April 27, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Generally located at the northeast corner of 59th Avenue and Elliot Road.
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 161
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
22029)
Abandonment: ABND 210044
Project: 21-4209
Applicant: Mark Abromovitz
Request: The 20-foot wide alley located at 602 East Lincoln St., between APNs 112-31
-048, 112-31-049A, and 112-31-088.
Date of Decision/Hearing: Oct. 28, 2021
Location
602 East Lincoln Street.
Council District: 8
Financial Impact
A consideration fee was also collected as part of this abandonment in the amount of
$16,000.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 162
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
(Ordinance G-6989)
Request to authorize the City Manager to amend section 32-24 of the City Code as it
relates to the method and medium of presentation for final plat submittals.
The intent of this code amendment is to take advantage of new technologies to
simplify the plat submittal process and reduce costs to customers to submit final plats
to the Planning and Development Department for review and approval. The current
code requires plats to be submitted on linen, plastic or other non-shrinking material.
The sole purpose of the requirement was to guarantee the physical longevity of the
plat for record keeping purposes. This is no longer required, as plat records are now
stored digitally and can be scanned from paper or uploaded from digital files. The
proposed code change will align the plat submittal process with current industry
standards.
Department policy documents providing plat submittal requirements will be updated
upon the passage of the requested code amendment. The specific recommended
code amendment is reflected in Attachment A.
Concurrence
The Development Advisory Board recommended approval of the amendment at its
Jan. 20, 2022 meeting.
Financial Impact
There are no costs associated with this code amendment.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 163
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING A PORTIONS OF THE CODE OF THE
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA, CHAPTER 32, ARTICLE III,
SUBDIVISION PLAT RQUIREMENTS, DESIGN PRINCIPLES AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX BY
AMENDING SECTION 24 INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR FINAL PLAT
SUBMITTAL.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as follows:
***
Section 32-24 Information required for final plat submittal.
A. Method and medium of presentation.
1. The record plat shall be ON A MATERIAL AND/OR IN A FORMAT APPROVED BY
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR. drawn in India ink on linen, plastic,
or other non-shrinking material on a sheet of 24 inches by 36 inches proportions;
2. THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR MAY
ESTABLISH POLICIES AND RULES FOR THE MATERIAL AND FORMAT OF THE
RECORD PLAT. Copies of the record plat shall be reproduced in the form of blueline or
blackline prints on a white background; and
3. The plat shall be drawn to an accurate scale having not more than 100 feet to an
inch.
***
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this ___ day of April, 2022
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________City Clerk
-1- Ordinance ________
Page 164
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________City Attorney
REVIEWED BY:
____________________________City Manager
-2- Ordinance ________
Page 165
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Approximately 1,400 Feet South of the Southeast Corner of 69th Avenue and Van
Buren Street (Ordinance G-6990)
Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
RE-43 (One-Family Residence District) to A-1 (Light Industrial District) to allow
industrial uses.
Summary
Current Zoning: RE-43
Proposed Zoning: A-1
Acreage: 6.19 acres
Proposal: Industrial uses
Owner: Franklin E. Gilbert Properties IV, LLC, et al.
Applicant: Shaine T. Alleman, Tiffany & Bosco, P.A.
Representative: Shaine T. Alleman, Tiffany & Bosco, P.A.
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Estrella Village Planning Committee heard this case on April 19,
2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 6-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on May 5, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Estrella Village Planning Committee recommendation,
by a vote of 8-0.
Location
Approximately 1,400 feet south of the southeast corner of 69th Avenue and Van Buren
Street
Council District: 7
Parcel Address: 32 S. 67th Ave.; and 11, 13, 15, and 223 S. 69th Ave.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 166
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE
FINAL, ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE
ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL
DESCRIBED HEREIN (CASE Z-40-21-7) FROM RE-43
(ONE-FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT) TO A-1 (LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX,
as follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 6.19-acre site located approximately
1,400 feet south of the southeast corner of 69th Avenue and Van Buren Street in
a portion of Section 12, Township 1 North, Range 1 East, as described more
specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from “RE-43” (One-Family Residence
District) to “A-1” (Light Industrial District).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district
classification change as shown in Exhibit “B.”
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the
use district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following
stipulations, violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation
of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
Page 167
1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date
stamped April 6, 2022, as modified by the following stipulations, and as
approved by the Planning and Development Department, with specific regard
to the following:
a. Minimum 25-foot-wide landscape setback along 67th Avenue.
b. Minimum 10-foot-wide landscape setback along 69th Avenue and
Farmer Road.
c. Minimum landscape setbacks of varying width, as depicted, along
interior property lines.
2. The north and west elevations of the western building, as depicted on the site
plan date stamped April 6, 2022, and any elevation facing a public street shall
not contain roll-up garage doors.
3. The north elevation of the western building, as depicted on the site plan date
stamped April 6, 2022, shall not contain windows above 15 feet, where there is
occupiable space at the window level.
4. The maximum building height shall not exceed 46 feet.
5. The required and stipulated landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum
50 percent 2-inch caliper and 50 percent 3-inch caliper size trees and five 5-
gallon shrubs per tree. Landscaping along 67th Avenue shall conform with the
Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping Program landscape palette and
landscaping standards for the village parkway of 67th Avenue in the Estrella
Village, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. Where
utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
6. All uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with minimum 2-
inch caliper drought-tolerant shade trees and five 5-gallon shrubs per tree.
Landscaping shall be dispersed throughout the parking area and achieve 25
percent shade at maturity, as approved by Planning and Development
Department.
7. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
8. One outdoor employee resting area of no less than 400 square feet or two 200-
square-foot areas shall be provided on site. Each required pedestrian area
shall include a minimum of two pedestrian seating benches, constructed of
quality and durable materials, and shaded to a minimum of 75 percent using
large canopy drought-tolerant shade trees of minimum 2-inch caliper size
Page 168
and/or architectural shade, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
9. A minimum of 10 bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U
and/or artistic racks dispersed throughout the site and installed per the
requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
10. The sidewalk along 67th Avenue shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width and
detached with a minimum 10-foot-wide landscape strip located between the
sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following standards, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper drought-tolerant shade trees that provide a
minimum of 75 percent shade at maturity.
b. Drought-tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at
maturity.
c. The landscape palette and planting standards, unless otherwise
provided herein, shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street
Landscaping Program requirements for the village parkway of 67th
Avenue.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
11. The developer shall dedicate 55 feet of right-of-way along the west side of 67th
Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
12. The developer shall dedicate a 33-foot by 33-foot visibility triangle at the
intersection of 69th Avenue and Farmer Road, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.
13. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping, and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.
14. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
15. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase
I data testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archeological data recovery excavations.
Page 169
16. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.
17. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by
the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of June,
2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
Page 170
_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 171
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-40-21-7
Section 12, Township 1N, Range 1E, The South 100 feet of Tract 9,
WESTERN ACRES, according to Book 29 of Maps, page 23, records of
Maricopa County, Arizona.
Section 12, Township 1N, Range 1E, Tract 9, WESTERN ACRES,
according to Book 29 of Maps, page 23, records of Maricopa County,
Arizona; EXCEPT the South 100 feet thereof; and EXCEPT the North 135
feet thereof.
Section 12, Township 1N, Range 1E, The South half of Tract 12,
WESTERN ACRES, according to Book 29 of Maps, page 23, records of
Maricopa County, Arizona.
Section 12, Township 1N, Range 1E, Tract PARCEL 10, #1: WESTERN
ACRES, according to Book 29 of Maps, page 23, records of Maricopa
County, Arizona, EXCEPT the North 110 feet.
Section 12, Township 1N, Range 1E, North 110 feet, Tract Ten, Western
Acres, according to the plat of record in the office of the Maricopa County
Recorder in Book 29, page 15, of Maps, Maricopa County, Arizona.
Page 172
Page 173
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-62-18-2 (Verdin PUD) - Southwest
corner of the 24th Street Alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive (Ordinance G-
6991)
Request to hold a public hearing and amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section
601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-62-18-
2 and rezone the site from S-1 DCOD (Ranch or Farm Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District), S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence District), and RE-35 DCOD
(Single-Family Residence District, Desert Character Overlay District) to PUD DCOD
(Pending PUD) (Planned Unit Development, Desert Character Overlay District,
pending Planned Unit Development) and PUD (Planned Unit Development) to allow
single-family residential. This is a companion case to GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, Z-75-18-2,
and Z-TA-5-18-2 and must be heard following Z-TA-5-18-2.
Summary
Current Zoning: S-1 DCOD (144.82 acres), S-1 (333.57 acres), RE-35 DCOD (10.24
acres)
Proposed Zoning: PUD DCOD (Pending PUD) (155.06 acres) and PUD (333.57 acres)
Acreage: 488.63 acres
Proposal: Planned Unit Development to allow single family residential
Owner: MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Applicant: Taylor Morrison/Arizona, Inc.
Representative: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Info: The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case on Nov. 6,
2018, Apr. 2, 2019, and Dec. 7, 2021, for information only. The North Gateway Village
Planning Committee heard this case on Nov. 8, 2018 and Dec. 9, 2021, for information
only.
VPC Action: The North Gateway Village Planning Committee heard this case on March
10, 2022 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation with a modified
stipulation, by a vote of 4-1. The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this
case on April 5, 2022 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation with
Page 174
modifications and additional stipulations, by a vote of 10-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on May 5, 2022 and
recommended approval, per the staff memo dated May 5, 2022, by a vote of 7-1.
Location
Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive.
Council District: 2
Parcel Address: 28239 N. 23rd St.; and 28231, 28235, 28241, and 28245 N. 24th St.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 175
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(CASE Z-62-18-2) FROM S-1 DCOD (RANCH OR FARM
RESIDENCE DISTRICT, DESERT CHARACTER OVERLAY
DISTRICT), S-1 (RANCH OR FARM RESIDENCE DISTRICT), AND
RE-35 DCOD (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT, DESERT
CHARACTER OVERLAY DISTRICT) TO PUD (PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 488.63-acre site located at the southwest
corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive in a portion of Sections 22
and 27, Township 5 North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A”, is
hereby changed from 144.82 acres of “S-1 DCOD” (Ranch or Farm Residence District,
Desert Character Overlay District), 333.57 acres of “S-1” (Ranch or Farm Residence
District), and 10.24 acres of “RE-35 DCOD” (Single-Family Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District) to “PUD” (Planned Unit Development).
Page 176
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B”.
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Verdin PUD reflecting the changes
approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and
Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this
request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the
Development Narrative date stamped March 3, 2022, as modified by the
following stipulations:
a. Pages 6, 8, 26, and 28: Revise all references to the maximum density to
2.6 dwelling units per acre.
b. Pages 6, 8, 26, and 28: Revise all references to the maximum number
of units to 1,250 dwelling units.
c. Pages 23, 26, 28, 29, 35, 36, 59, 63, 75, 134, 135, and 136: Remove all
references to the “Single-Family Residential – Small Lot (SFR-3)” land
use district. Unit counts and percentages related to this removal shall be
updated accordingly.
d. Pages 20, 52, 61, 102, and 113: Revise all references to the width of the
multi-use trail easement along the Mesquite Wash corridor to 30-feet-
wide.
e. Pages 51, 71, 75, 76, 83, 86, 87, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110,
119, and 121: Revise all references to the “Approved Plant Palette” to
“Plant Palette”.
f. Pages 8-22, Section 2. Land Use Plan, and pages 97-123, Section 9.
Certified Open Space Design Guidelines: Add language regarding
conveyance of approximately 16 acres addressed in Stipulation No. 8.
There shall be a provision for both on site open space and the dedicated
16 acres to count towards total open space.
g. Page 16, Off-Site Connectivity: Add language regarding public trail
access easements provided for the Mesquite Wash corridor trail and
Page 177
community paseo paths, per Stipulation No. 6. The section shall
specifically note that the access easements will ensure permanent
public access and restrict unauthorized motor vehicle access through
the residential community to the Sonoran Preserve.
h. Page 23, Section 1.d.Accessory uses.(1): Revise to read, “permanent
and/or temporary alcoholic beverage and/or food sales and/or
consumption;”
i. Page 35, Single-Family Land Use District Development Standards
Table: Add a row after Max. Dwelling Unit Density that reads “Maximum
Units: 1,250 dwelling units for the entire PUD area”.
j. Pages 36-37, Single-Family Land Use District Development Standards
Table: Add a footnote that refers to the development parcel allocation
table in Section 4.c. (Regulatory Standards & Land Use Districts –
Development Standards) for the maximum unit counts for each
development parcel.
k. Page 41, Section 6.1: Revise to read, “When not prohibited by City
Code, Section 31-13, primary ornamental entries no higher than 16-feet
are allowed…”
l. Page 41, Section 6.3.a: Add the following sentence under the existing
sentence: “Any walls or fencing along a preserve edge/MCFCD property
boundary, other than walls or fencing for individual residential lots, shall
be comprised of the barrier fencing type, which are designed with
sufficient openings to allow the regular passage of wildlife.”
m. Page 42, Section 6.3.B: Revise the reference to ‘a maximum 6-foot, 4-
inch high full view fencing” to ‘a maximum 5-foot high full view fencing’.
n. Page 46, Section 6.6: Change ‘14 feet’ to ‘12 feet’.
o. Pages 52-53, Section 2.C: Add language regarding public trail access
easements provided for the Mesquite Wash corridor trail and community
paseo paths, per Stipulation No. 6. The section should specifically note
that the access easements will ensure permanent public access and
restrict unauthorized motor vehicle access through the residential
community to the Sonoran Preserve.
p. Page 79-80, Section 5.A, Last bullet point: Add the following after the
first sentence: “The use of retaining walls in excess of 4 feet is
discouraged and should be limited to locations where necessary to
accommodate specific site topography.”
q. Pages 90-91, Section 6.H: Delete “Chilopsis Linearis – Desert Willow”
tree from the Green List and add it to the Yellow List trees on page 91.
Page 178
r. Pages 90 and 92, Section 6.H: Delete “Celtis Reticulata – Netleaf
Hackberry” shrub from the Yellow List and add it to the Green List
shrubs on page 90.
s. Page 101, Certified Area Open Space Types Exhibit: Update the exhibit
to include the 25-foot open space tract that will be provided along the
eastern boundary of the site as a certified area Type “B” – natural
revegetated area.
t. Page 105-108, Section 1.D.2: Add language regarding the minimum 25-
foot open space tract that will be provided along the eastern boundary of
the site to provide a transition to the Cave Creek Wash corridor. Explain
that the area’s plant material will be from the Plant Palette Green List.
u. Pages 119 and 121, 1.E. Plant and Wildlife Relationship Matrix, Plant
Palette: Green List: Remove the image and information regarding
“Chilopsis Linearis – Desert Willow” and add to the Plant Palette: Yellow
List on page 121.
v. Pages 119 and 122, 1.E. Plant and Wildlife Relationship Matrix, Plant
Palette: Yellow List: Remove the image information regarding “Celtis
Reticulata – Netleaf Hackberry” and add to the Plant Palette: Green List
on page 119.
w. Page 123, Section 10.1.B: Revise to read, “The maximum height for
primary ornamental entry sign lettering and copy is 16 feet…”
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study
is reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall provide signal warrant
analysis for development access points along Sonoran Desert Drive as well as
7th Street and Dove Valley Road. The developer will be responsible for all
additional dedications and/or roadway and signal improvements as identified
by the approved study.
3. The developer shall submit Master Street Design and Phasing Plans for each
Development Unit, as required by Section 636, Planned Community District
(PCD), of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
4. All designated public roadways shall meet the City of Phoenix Storm Water
Design Manual Standards for wash crossings.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping, and other incidentals as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.
Page 179
6. The developer shall provide public trail access easements for the Mesquite
Wash corridor trail and community paseo paths that provide connection to the
Sonoran Preserve as depicted on Exhibit 6, Pedestrian Circulation Plan, in the
development narrative, as modified and approved by the Parks and Recreation
Department and Planning and Development Department. The public access
shall be designed to restrict unauthorized motor vehicle access, as approved
by the Parks and Recreation Department and Planning and Development
Department. The location and design of trail connections shall be coordinated
with the Parks and Recreation Department and Planning and Development
Department.
7. A minimum 12-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) shall be constructed within a 30-
foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE) along the Mesquite Wash in
accordance with Section 429 of the City of Phoenix MAG supplemental detail,
as modified to address wash corridor constraints and approved by the Planning
and Development Department.
8. The developer shall convey approximately 16 acres located at the southeast
corner of the site within the erosion hazard setback area along the Cave Creek
Wash corridor, as generally shown on Exhibit 11 of the development narrative,
to the City of Phoenix for inclusion in the Sonoran Preserve, as modified and
approved by the Parks and Recreation Department and Planning and
Development Department. The final acreage and configuration of the property
to be conveyed, along with timing of the conveyance, shall be mutually agreed
upon by the developer, the Parks and Recreation Department, and Planning
and Development Department.
9. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
10. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
11. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
12. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.
Page 180
13. The developer shall notify the following individuals by email a minimum of 15
days prior to any preliminary site plan review meetings with the Planning and
Development Department, Planning Hearing Officer requests to modify
stipulations, or any zoning adjustment requests. The notice shall include the
date, time and location of the meeting/hearing.
a. Dr. Gary Kirkilas: garykirkilas@gmail.com
b. Members of the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve and Mountain
Parks/Preserves Committee
c Vashti “Tice” Supplee: vsupplee25@gmail.com
14. Approval of the Planned Unit Development shall be conditioned upon the final
execution of a development agreement between the City and the developer
within 24 months of City Council approval of this change of zone. Additionally,
the development agreement shall be executed prior to final site plan approval
and issuance of any grading and drainage permits. The development
agreement shall at a minimum outline the requirements for initial improvements
to Sonoran Desert Drive, as well as financial contributions for the ultimate
buildout of Sonoran Desert Drive, as modified and approved by the Street
Transportation and Planning and Development departments.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion
of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of June, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
Page 181
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_____________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (2 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 182
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-62-18-2
PARCEL NO. 1:
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 3
EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 3
EAST, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22;
THENCE NORTH 00° 20' 16" EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION
22, A DISTANCE OF 2,501.66 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTH 90° 00' 00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2,642.12 FEET TO THE
NORTH-SOUTH MID-SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 22;
THENCE NORTH 00° 28' 49" EAST, ALONG SAID MID-SECTION LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 141.23 FEET TO THE EAST-WEST MID-SECTION LINE OF SAID
SECTION 22;
THENCE NORTH 89° 48' 35" EAST, ALONG SAID MID-SECTION, LINE A
DISTANCE OF 2,641.83 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID
SECTION 22;
THENCE SOUTH 00° 20' 16" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION
22, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL NO. 2:
THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST OF
THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA;
EXCEPT ALL THE COAL AND OTHER MINERALS, AS RESERVED IN THE
PATENT. (AFFECTS THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION
27).
EXCEPT ALL MINERALS IN SAID LAND AS RESERVED TO THE UNITED
STATES IN PATENT; AND
EXCEPTING ALL URANIUM, THORIUM, OR OTHER MATERIAL WHICH IS OR
MAY BE DETERMINED TO BE PECULIARLY ESSENTIAL TO THE PRODUCTION
Page 183
OF FISSIONABLE MATERIALS, WHETHER OR NOT OF COMMERCIAL VALUE
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT OF AUGUST 1, 1946 (60 STAT.
755), AS SET FORTH IN THE PATENT ON SAID LAND. (AFFECTS THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 2).
Page 184
Page 185
Attachment B
Staff Report Z-62-18-2
Verdin PUD
March 9, 2022
North Gateway Village Planning March 10, 2022
Committee Meeting Date:
Desert View Village Planning April 5, 2022
Committee Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 5, 2022
Request From: S-1 DCOD (144.82 acres), S-1 (333.57 acres),
RE-35 DCOD (10.24 acres)
Request To: PUD DCOD (Pending PUD) (155.06 acres),
PUD (333.57 acres)
Proposed Use: Planned Unit Development to allow single-
family residential
Location: Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment
and Sonoran Desert Drive
Owner: MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Applicant Taylor Morrison/Arizona, Inc.
Representative Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations
General Plan Conformity
Current: Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 dwelling
units per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units
per acre, Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5
dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5
dwelling units per acre, Preserves / Floodplain,
General Plan Land Use Map
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay
Designation
Proposed (GPA-DSTV-1-18-2): Residential 2 to
3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5
dwelling units per acre, Preserves / Floodplain,
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay removal
Page 186
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
Street Map Sonoran Desert
Major Arterial 80-foot south half street
Classification Drive
CONNECT PEOPLE & PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE
PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity, respectful of local
conditions and surrounding neighborhoods.
The proposed development creates a residential community at a density of 3.0 dwelling
units per acre. The site will incorporate open edge treatments, various open space
areas, and connectivity to the surrounding Sonoran Preserve areas. The protection of
native vegetation and character of the area is consistent with the North Land Use Plan
and the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan, which both emphasize preservation of desert
character.
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES & NEIGHBORHOODS CORE VALUE;
DIVERSE NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Include a mix of housing
types and densities where appropriate within each village that support a broad
range of lifestyles.
The proposed General Plan Land Use Map amendment and concurrent rezoning case
will allow for single-family residential development options adjacent to a major arterial
street and in close proximity to the North Gateway Core and Cave Creek Road. The
various lot sizes and single-family housing products proposed in the development will
support a range of lifestyles for Phoenix residents.
BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES & SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new
development and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.
The proposed PUD narrative includes standards for desert-appropriate vegetation and
trees strategically located to provide shade and visual enhancement throughout the
community. The PUD has also fostered a collaboration with the National Wildlife
Federation to establish design guidelines to integrate and preserve plantings and
existing trees in the development. The landscaping standards in the PUD will provide
significant shade for pedestrians and will help reduce the urban heat island effect within
the development and in the greater Desert View area.
Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives
North Land Use Plan: See Background Item No. 4.
Page 187
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
Tree and Shade Master Plan: See Background Item No. 15.
Complete Streets Guiding Principles: See Background Item No. 16.
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan: See Background Item No. 17.
Housing Phoenix: See Background Item No. 18.
Zero Waste PHX: See Background Item No. 19.
Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning
Land Use Zoning
On Site Vacant S-1, S-1 DCOD, RE-35 DCOD
North (Across
Phoenix Sonoran
Sonoran Desert RE-35 DCOD
Preserve
Drive)
Vacant, Phoenix
West RE-35, S-1
Sonoran Preserve
Cave Creek Wash,
East Vacant (State Trust RE-35
Land)
Phoenix Sonoran
South RE-35
Preserve
Page 188
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
Background/Issues/Analysis
REQUEST
1. This is a request to rezone
a 488.63-gross acre site
located at the southwest
corner of the 24th Street
alignment and Sonoran
Desert Drive from S-1
DCOD (Ranch or Farm
Proposed
Residence, Desert
Character Overlay District), PUD
S-1 (Ranch or Farm
Residence), RE-35 DCOD
(Single-Family Residence
District, Desert Character
Overlay District) to PUD
(Planned Unit
Development) to allow a Zoning Sketch Map, Source: City of Phoenix
single-family residential Planning and Development Department
development, not to
exceed 1,420 units.
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATIONS
2. The site has General Plan Land Use Map designations of Preserves /
Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per
acre (138.83 acres), Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre /
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre (312.30 acres), Preserves /
Floodplain (23.24 acres), Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (474.37 acres). The
proposal is not consistent with these designations and, as the site exceeds 10
acres in size, the applicant has filed a General Plan Amendment, GPA-DSTV-1-
18-2, as a companion case to this rezoning request. The GPA request is for
Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units
per acre (451.13 acres), Preserves / Floodplain (23.24 acres), Infrastructure
Phasing Overlay removal (474.37 acres). Staff is recommending approval as
the designation will allow development at a density of 3.0 dwelling units per
acre.
Page 189
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
EXISTING PROPOSED
Existing and Proposed General Land Use Designation Maps, Source: City of Phoenix
Planning and Development Department
North of the northern boundary of the subject site is designated Future
Parks/Open Space or 1 dwelling unit per acre.
The area directly east of the subject site is designated Preserves/Floodplain.
South of the subject site is designated Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling
units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Publicly Owned
Parks/Open Space.
West of the subject site is designated Publicly Owned Parks/Open Space and
open space owned by the ASLD designated Future Parks/Open Space or 1
dwelling unit per acre.
Page 190
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
EXISTING CONDITIONS & SURROUNDING ZONING
3. The subject site is currently vacant and zoned S-1 DCOD (Ranch or Farm
Residence, Desert Character Overlay District), S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence),
RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence District, Desert Character Overlay
District). The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
Aerial Sketch Map, Source: City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department
NORTH
North of the northern boundary of the subject site is Sonoran Desert Drive and
the Sonoran Preserve. Sonoran Desert Drive is designated as a major arterial
roadway and is an important east-west alignment between Interstate 17 and
northeast Phoenix. This roadway alignment is proposed to have a total of six
lanes, three in each direction. The Sonoran Preserve consists of over 9,600
acres of relatively undisturbed natural areas in North Phoenix with various trail
connectivity throughout. Additionally, this area is owned by the Arizona State
Land Department (ASLD).
EAST
East of the subject site is Cave Creek Wash and its associated floodplain. The
floodplain also encroaches onto the southeast portion of the subject site.
Page 191
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
SOUTH
South of the subject site is the Sonoran Preserve and Cave Buttes Recreation
Area. The Cave Buttes Recreation Area is a park that overseen by the
Maricopa County Flood Control District. This area contains a number of dams
that control flooding from washes in the general area.
WEST
West of the subject site is the Sonoran Preserve owned by the City of Phoenix
and vacant land owned by the ASLD.
AREA PLANS, OVERLAYS, AND INITATIVES
4. North Land Use Plan
The project site is
located within the
boundaries of the North
Land Use Plan. The
North Land Use Plan
was created in 1997 with
Subject Site
the purpose of
establishing growth
patterns while
preserving the desert
landscape and character
of the area. The plan
recognizes the
importance that the rural
character and lifestyle
play in determining
appropriate land use
densities. North Land Use Plan Map, Source: City of Phoenix
The northern portion of Planning and Development Department
the site is within the
North Land Use Plan
and the plan designates that area as 0 to 1.2 dwelling units per acre. The
proposed site will have a maximum of 1,420 units across the approximately 488-
acre site to ensure compatibility with the character of the North Land Use Plan.
The development also supports concepts in the North Land Use Plan by
preserving Cave Creek Wash’s natural flow and leaving that portion of the site
as natural open space. Additionally, the development will provide open edge
treatments adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve and blend the development edges
with the surrounding desert environment.
Page 192
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
PUD PROPOSAL
5. The proposal was developed utilizing the Planned Unit Development zoning
district. The PUD is intended to create a built environment that is superior to
what is produced through conventional zoning districts and design guidelines.
Using a collaborative and comprehensive approach, an applicant authors and
proposes standards and guidelines that are tailored to the context of a site on a
case by case basis. Where the PUD Development Narrative is silent on a
requirement, the applicable Zoning Ordinance provisions will be applied.
6. Land Use Plan: The PUD will
be a master-planned residential
community with a maximum of
1,420 dwelling units at an
overall density of 3.0 dwelling
units per acre. The
development will be a collection
of single-family neighborhoods
with various amenities, open
spaces, and a pedestrian
network connected to the
Sonoran Preserve and
surrounding desert environment.
The development will be divided
into three Master Development
Parcels ranging from
Conceptual Land Use Plan, Source: Gammage &
approximately 130 to 180 acres. Burnham
Each development parcel
represents an anticipated
development phase. The
development parcels will then
be divided into individual
residential neighborhood units,
which will range from 20 to 40
acres in size. Each
neighborhood unit will include a
mix of lot sizes, densities, and
home product types.
Master Development Parcel Exhibit, Source:
Gammage & Burnham
Page 193
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
7. Permitted Uses: The PUD proposes to allow single-family detached dwellings,
single-family attached dwellings, guesthouses, a community center, and model
homes by right. The primary uses for the community center are a place of
meeting, social activities, active or passive indoor and outdoor recreation and
entertainment, indoor and outdoor cooking areas and facilities, and a business
center. Accessory uses to the community center include alcoholic beverage or
food sales, convenience market, and snack bar/restaurant. Temporary uses to
the community center are community or special events, promotional events,
farmers markets, and mobile food vending and vendors, subject to Section 708
of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Accessory uses and structures are to comply
with its respective section in the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
8. Development Standards: The PUD sets forth several development standards
that only apply to the non-hillside areas of the PUD. All other areas of the PUD
will be subject to all Hillside Development Standards of the Zoning Ordinance,
which would override any of the PUD standards where conflicts arise.
Below is a summary of the development standards proposed in the PUD
development narrative for development parcel allocation and single-family land
use districts, which can be found on pages 28, 35, and 36 of the PUD
Development Narrative.
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL ALLOCATION
Master
Master Maximum
Development Maximum
Development Allowed Land Use Districts Allowed
Parcel Unit Count
Parcel Percentage
Acreage
Small Lot (SFR-3) 25%
A 154 +/- 550 Traditional (SFR-5, SFR-7) 75%
Estate (SFR-9, SFR-14) 50%
Small Lot (SFR-3) 25%
B 168 +/- 600 Traditional (SFR-5, SFR-7) 75%
Estate (SFR-9, SFR-14) 50%
Small Lot (SFR-3) 25%
C 166 +/- 600 Traditional (SFR-5, SFR-7) 75%
Estate (SFR-9, SFR-14) 50%
Total Gross
488 +/-
Acreage
Maximum Overall Unit Count 1,420
Maximum Overall Density 3.0 du/ac
Page 194
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Development
SFR-3 SFR-5 SFR-7 SFR-9 SFR-14
Standard
Minimum Lot
Area (square 3,000 5,000 7,000 9,000 14,000
feet)
Minimum Lot
40 feet 45 feet 55 feet 65 feet 90 feet
Width
Minimum Lot
None
Depth
Minimum Perimeter Building Setbacks
Sonoran
Desert 15 feet
Drive
Collector
15 feet
ROW
Minimum Interior Building Setbacks
Front 10 feet
Garage 18 feet, from back of sidewalk
Rear 5 feet 15 feet 20 feet
Street Side 5 feet 10 feet
0 feet, 10
Non-Street foot
5 feet
Side building
separation
Maximum
2 stories, 30 feet
Building Height
The proposed development standards allow for various types of residential
development throughout the community to ensure diversity and a variety of
lifestyle choices for residents.
9. Connectivity to the Sonoran Preserve: The Verdin development will provide
proximity and access to significant desert amenities, such as the Sonoran
Preserve, through trail connections, paseos, edge open space areas, and view
corridors. The PUD also provides various design guidelines and development
standards ensuring the project will integrate naturally with the surrounding
desert environment.
The property is adjacent to properties that are part of or targeted for acquisition
as part of the Sonoran Preserve. The developer and the City of Phoenix’s
Parks and Recreation Department intend to ensure opportunities for public
access to the Preserve. The development will provide public walk-in trailheads
and connections at various locations along the Preserve edge and Verdin’s
property boundaries. The final locations will be determined by the Parks and
Recreation Department.
Page 195
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
Additionally, a public trail will be
developed along the Mesquite Wash
Corridor, linking the north and south
halves of the Sonoran Preserve. At
the north and south ends of the
Mesquite Wash Corridor, the PUD
will provide public trailheads at
defined points of entry. The
Mesquite Wash Corridor trail will
include a 12-foot-wide natural
surface multi-use trail within a 20-
foot-wide public multi-use trail
easement. Conceptual Trailhead Example, Source:
Gammage & Burnham
Internal to the development there
will be minimum 40-foot-wide
landscaped pedestrian paseo corridors with 6 to 8 foot wide paths located
between neighborhood units. The Paseo Corridors will extend from the internal
pedestrian circulation system to the aforestated trailheads.
Trails will be provided in limited areas near the property perimeter where future
connections to the Sonoran Preserve are anticipated. These trails will be
comprised of a natural surface no greater than 4 feet in width. The final
locations of the connection points will be determined in coordination with the
Parks and Recreation Department.
Per the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan,
the development intends to integrate
into the larger desert character by
having open edges along the perimeter
of the community. The open edge plan
will promote visual and physical
connectivity to and from the property,
maintain washes and other significant
landforms, and protect flora and fauna
in the area. A minimum of 60% of the
open edge treatment will be provided
along the preserve edge.
Edge Openness Plan, Source: Gammage &
Burnham
Page 196
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
10. Landscape Standards: The PUD outlines landscaping standards that exceed
the requirements contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Below is a summary of
the landscape standards proposed in the PUD development narrative for the
single-family land use districts, which can be found on pages 35 and 36 of the
PUD Development Narrative.
SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT LANDSCAPE STANDARDS
Development
SFR-3 SFR-5 SFR-7 SFR-9 SFR-14
Standard
Minimum Common Landscape Setbacks
Sonoran
Desert Drive 30 feet average, 15 feet minimum
ROW
Arterial/
Collector 15 feet average, 10 feet minimum
ROW
All Other
Perimeter
No requirement
Property
Lines
Common Area
(per Master
20% gross
Development
Parcel)
Common Area
(per
10% gross
Neighbirhood
Unit)
Landscape
Standars
Perimeter common: Trees spaces a maximum of 20 to 30 feet
Adjacent to
on center or in equivalent groupings
Sonoran Desert
Drive
Neighborhood Entry Units will provide a detached 6-foot-wide public sidewalk
with enhanced landscaping and shade trees planted at an interval of 1 tree per
25 feet or in equivalent groupings. A minimum of three 3-inch caliper shade
trees will be planted on either side of the Neighborhood Entry Unit. Any
additional trees shall be a combination of 1-inch caliper (maximum 25%) and 2-
inch caliper (maximum 75%) trees.
Local street sidewalks will be 5 feet in width and attached on both sides of
local streets, except in locations where adjacent to common open space areas.
To encourage shading of sidewalks, shade trees shall be planted with the front
yard of all residential lots. Each shade tree shall be a minimum 24 inch box
tree.
Page 197
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
11. Open Space: Verdin has partnered with the National Wildlife Federation to
establish guidelines to maintain natural habitats and native species within the
community. The collaboration will use a minimum of 80% native plants, develop
habitat management plans for Verdin’s Homeowner’s Association(s), support
monarch butterfly recovery efforts, and design and build Early Childhood Health
Outdoors playscapes.
The use of native plants creates an environment that is familiar to wildlife
species and consistent with what is found in the natural desert environment.
Natural open space areas will be designated for the purposed of maintaining
sensitive habitat and natural desert character. These open areas will be marked
with signage and fencing to reduce human impact and promote property edges
that blend seamlessly with the adjacent desert environment. Verdin has
identified unique area types that will promote the above principles.
Certified Area Open Space Types, Source: Gammage & Burnham
Type A, Preserved Habitat, areas will emphasize the preservation of existing
natural, undisturbed desert. Type B, Natural Revegetated, areas are those that
require disturbances, but are revegetated with the intent to match the plant
densities and character of the natural desert. Salvaged and nursery-grown
native plant materials will be utilized for the revegetation and temporary
irrigation of these materials will be allowed to support the re-establishment.
Type C, Maintained, areas will be common open space for recreational uses
and/or may require ongoing aesthetic maintenance.
Page 198
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
12. Design Guidelines: The PUD sets forth an extensive list of design
requirements for neighborhood units, streets, pedestrian connectivity, open
space, amenities, grading and drainage, and utilities. The PUD also integrates
a number of design considerations based on the Desert Character Overlay
District standards, including a sensitive transituon from open space to
developed areas, conservation of washes and wildlife habitats, and use of
native plants. There are also architectural standards for elevations, windows,
doors, and roofs. These standards and design features ensure that a high-
quality development is provided on site with a diversity in elevation
combinations. Architectural standards includes a variety in traditional roof
forms, outdoor living spaces, signature design elements, articulation, pop-outs,
and recesses. The complete language regarding design guidelines can be
found on pages 47 through 122.
13. Amenities: The PUD proposes two
community amenity areas and parks
and common open spaces equitably
distributed throughout the community.
A primary community amenity area will
include a private community center and
outdoor recreation facilities. Other
primary community resident amenities
may include a pool, play area, even and
gathering lawn, patio with fire pit, yoga,
meditation area, and outdoor lounge
area/kitchen. A secondary community
Conceptual Community Area, Source:
open space is proposed to include a
Gammage & Burnham
ramada, play area, demonstration
garden, and lawn seating area.
Verdin will also include neighborhood parks that can provide a combination of
active and passive uses at a smaller scale. The neighborhood parks will be
located centrally to each neighborhood unit.
14. Signage: Signs within the PUD will comply with Section 705 of the Zoning
Ordinance with some modifications regarding ground and combination signs.
The Primary Ornamental Entry Signs will be provided near the primary entrance
and/or along the primary collector. A maximum of two primary ornamental entry
signs are permitted in the development. These signs will be 12-feet maximum
in height, but non-supporting structures such as towers, columns, and trims may
be up to a maximum of 30 feet in height. The maximum sign lettering area is
100 square feet per sign.
The Neighborhood Unit Signs and Secondary Ornamental Entry Signs are
freestanding ground mounted signs located on or incorporated into a solid base,
or wall mounted signs. There will be a maximum of two single-faced
Page 199
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
neighborhood unit identification signs or one double-faced neighborhood unit
identification sign allowed per entrance to a neighborhood unit. The maximum
height for these signs is 8 feet, including embellishments, architecture, walls, or
other similar features. The maximum sign lettering is 44 square feet per sign.
CITYWIDE STUDIES AND POLICIES
15. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan has a goal of treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure trees are an integral part of the City’s planning and
development process. Sidewalks on street frontages should be detached from
the curbs to allow trees to be planted on both sides of the sidewalk to provide
thermal comfort for pedestrians and to reduce the urban heat island effect. The
development will provide detached sidewalks along primary and secondary
collectors, adjacent to Neighborhood Unit entries, and adjacent to common
open spaces with contiguous local street frontages greater than 50 feet and 15-
feet in depth. The proposed PUD narrative includes standards for desert-
appropriate vegetation and trees strategically located to provide shade and
visual enhancement throughout the community. The PUD has also fostered a
collaboration with the National Wildlife Federation to establish design guidelines
to integrate and preserve plantings and existing trees in the development. The
landscaping standards in the PUD will provide significant shade for pedestrians
and will help reduce the urban heat island effect within the development and in
the greater Desert View area.
16. Complete Streets Guiding Principles
In 2014, the City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding
Principles. The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide
an accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such
as bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. The proposed PUD sets forth
standards that will improve the pedestrian environment, including landscaped
paseos and trails, detached sidewalks, tree shade cover, and shaded open
space and amenity areas.
17. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
The City of Phoenix adopted the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan in 2014 to
guide the development of its Bikeway System and supportive infrastructure.
The Development Narrative states that an extensive pedestrian network of
walking and bicycle paths will be available for resident use in order to create a
sustainable and inviting community. Collector roadways in the development will
include the construction of detached 8-foot-wide public sidewalks, including
bicycle lanes. Additionally, the community open spaces will be connected
through a comprehensive system of pedestrian and bicycle trails.
Page 200
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
18. Housing Phoenix
In June 2020, the Phoenix City Council approved the Housing Phoenix Plan.
This plan contains policy initiatives for the development and preservation of
housing with a vision of creating a stronger and more vibrant Phoenix through
increased housing options for residents at all income levels and family sizes.
Phoenix’s rapid population growth and housing underproduction has led to a
need for over 163,000 new housing units. Current shortages of housing supply
relative to demand are a primary reason why housing costs are increasing. The
proposed development will provide a maximum of 1,420 units, which will be a
mix of single-family and multifamily units. These proposed units support the
Housing Phoenix Plan’s goal of preserving or creating 50,000 housing units by
2030 and contributes to a variety of housing types that will address the supply
shortage.
19. Zero Waste PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a
goal to become a zero waste city, as part of the City’s overall 2050
Environmental Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this
is to improve and expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs.
Section 716 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance establishes standards to
encourage the provision of recycling containers for multifamily, commercial, and
mixed use developments meeting certain criteria. The Development Narrative
states that recycling receptacles will be provided and a sustainable recycling
program will be actively pursued and supported for all single-family
development.
COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
20. At the time the staff report was written staff had received 82 letters in opposition
and 6 letters in support of the proposal.
Letters in opposition expressed the following concerns:
• Current road infrastructure is at capacity. Additional homes will increase
traffic and decrease resident safety.
• The preserve area needs to be maintained as is for hiking, biking,
walking, trail running, and other outdoor activities.
• Development will have a negative impact on the area’s natural flora and
fauna.
• The proposal should maintain the requirements for the Desert Character
Overlay District.
• Density/number of units is too high.
• Zoning should remain as S-1.
• Additional homes will result in water resource issues.
• Sonoran Desert Drive should remain a scenic corridor.
• The proposed development does not match the character of the area.
Page 201
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
• Additional development will result in further strain on the school district.
• These is a lack of amenities to support the development.
Letters in support discussed the following items:
• Density at 3 dwelling units per acre is reasonable for the area.
• The proposal will provide additional housing, which is needed in the area.
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
21. The Parks and Recreation Department provided comments indicating that the
Department would want to purchase the parcel to the east of the development,
but did not have a trailhead planned for the site and did not foresee the need for
connection from Verdin at this time.
22. The Street Transportation Department provided the following comments:
• The developer is required to complete a Traffic Impact Study to the City
for the development. Additionally, the developer shall submit Master
Street Design and Phasing Plants for each Development Unit. This is
addressed in Stipulation Nos. 2 and 3.
• Public Roadways shall meet appropriate Storm Water Design Manual
standards for wash crossings. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 4.
• The developer shall provide the appropriate construction for right-of-way
within and adjacent to the development. This is addressed in Stipulation
No. 5.
23. The Water Services Department commented that the closest water and sewer
mains are within Cave Creek Road. The Department stated that new water
main extensions will be required at the time of development and particular
pressure zones will require private booster pumps. The Department stated that
depending on the timing for the development, the development can either flow
to the 91st Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant or to the Cave Creek Water
Reclamation Plant. The developer may also be required to upsize or provide a
relief sewer line to portions of the existing sewer main within Cave Creek Road
to accommodate the increased flows.
24. The Floodplain Management Division of the Public Works Department has
indicated that the parcel is located in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), as
designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The
division indicated that no encroachment is allowed in the floodway without
hydrologic and hydraulic analysis showing no rise in water surface elevation and
increase in the special flood hazard boundaries. The division also indicated that
the lowest floor of all structures constructed in the SFHA shall be a minimum of
Page 202
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
one foot above the Base Flood Elevation (BFE). The lowest adjacent grade to
the structure must be a minimum of at or above the BFE. Additionally, no
basements are allowed in residential structures located in a SFHA.
25. The Fire Department indicated that they do not anticipate any problems with the
referenced case. Additionally, site and buildings shall comply with the Phoenix
Fire Code. The current water supply is also unknown, but will be required to
meet fire flow requirements.
OTHER
26. The site is located in a larger area identified as being archaeologically sensitive.
If further review by the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office determines the site
and immediate area to be archaeologically sensitive, and if no previous
archaeological projects have been conducted within this project area, it is
recommended that archaeological Phase I data testing of this area be
conducted. Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations may be
necessary based upon the results of the testing. A qualified archaeologist must
make this determination in consultation with the City of Phoenix Archaeologist.
In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, all
ground disturbing activities must cease within a 33-foot radius of the discovery
and the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office must be notified immediately and
allowed time to properly assess the materials. This is addressed in Stipulation
Nos. 6 through 9.
27. Development and use of the site are subject to all applicable codes and
ordinances. Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements.
Other formal action such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and
abandonments, may be required.
Findings
1. The proposed PUD is located directly adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve and
includes standards that ensure appropriate transitions from the development to
adjacent preserve areas.
2. The proposal balances the need for additional housing, while retaining and
preserving the desert landscape throughout the development, as outlined in the
North Land Use Plan and Sonoran Preserve Master Plan.
3. The proposal includes several development standards, such as increased open
edge conditions, increased common area, and design guidelines that exceed
conventional Zoning Ordinance standards.
Page 203
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
Stipulations
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Sendero Foothills PUD reflecting the
changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and
Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request.
The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the Development
Narrative date stamped November 29, 2021, as modified by the following
stipulations:
a. Page 23, Section 1.d.Accessory uses.(1): Revise to read, “permanent
and/or temporary alcoholic beverage and/or food sales and/or
consumption;”
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is
reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall provide signal warrant analysis
for development access points along Sonoran Desert Drive as well as 7th Street
and Dove Valley Road. The developer will be responsible for all additional
dedications and/or roadway and signal improvements as identified by the
approved study.
3. The developer shall submit Master Street Design and Phasing Plans for each
Development Unit, as required by Section 636, Planned Community District
(PCD), of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
4. All designated public roadways shall meet the City of Phoenix Storm Water
Design Manual Standards for wash crossings.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping, and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
6. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
7. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
Page 204
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
8. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33- foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
Writer
Julianna Pierre
March 9, 2022
Team Leader
Samantha Keating
Exhibits
Zoning sketch map
Aerial sketch map
Community correspondence (111 pages)
Verdin PUD date stamped March 3, 2022
Page 205
RE-35
E SONORAN DESERT DR
Desert Maintenance
Character A Overlay
S-1 District
S-1
Desert Maintenance
Character B
Overlay District
I Feet
CAREFREE HWY
DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
DYNAMITE BLVD
47,000 23,500 0 47,000 JOMAX RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD
Z-62-18 PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
SR-101
BLACK MTN PKY
MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Taylor Morrison/Arizona, Inc.
FROM:
S-1 DCOD (144.82 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
10/16/2018 S-1 (333.57 a.c.)
Z-62-18 REVISION DATES:
RE-35 DCOD (10.24 a.c.)
10/17/2018 10/22/2018
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET 10/19/2018 12/01/2022
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
TO:
PUD DCOD (Pending PUD) (155.06 a.c.)
488.63 Acres QS 52-31, QS 52-32
QS 52-33, QS 53-32 Q-9 PUD (333.57 a.c)
QS 53-33, QS 54-32, QS 54-33
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 DCOD, S-1, RE-35 DCOD 145, 333, 11 N/A, N/A, 13
PUD DCOD (Pending PUD), PUD 186 (465), 1,000; Not to exceed 1,420 overall N/A
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-62-18 _Nov_2021_Update.mxd
Page 206
RE-35
E SONORAN DESERT DR
Desert Maintenance
Character A Overlay
S-1 District
S-1
Desert Maintenance
Character B
Overlay District
m apse rv ic es@ p hoe nix . go v
I Feet
CAREFREE HWY
DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
DYNAMITE BLVD
47,000 23,500 0 47,000 JOMAX RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD
Z-62-18 PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
SR-101
BLACK MTN PKY
MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Taylor Morrison/Arizona, Inc.
FROM:
S-1 DCOD (144.82 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
10/16/2018 S-1 (333.57 a.c.)
Z-62-18 REVISION DATES:
RE-35 DCOD (10.24 a.c.)
10/17/2018 10/22/2018
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET 10/19/2018 12/01/2022
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
TO:
PUD DCOD (Pending PUD) (155.06 a.c.)
488.63 Acres QS 52-31, QS 52-32
QS 52-33, QS 53-32 Q-9 PUD (333.57 a.c)
QS 53-33, QS 54-32, QS 54-33
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 DCOD, S-1, RE-35 DCOD 145, 333, 11 N/A, N/A, 13
PUD DCOD (Pending PUD), PUD 186 (465), 1,000; Not to exceed 1,420 overall N/A
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-62-18 _Nov_2021_Update.mxd
Page 207
From: Jo Ann Snyder
To: sdemmitt@gblaw.com; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Case # Z62-18;GPA-DSTV-1-18-1 and ZTA5-18
Date: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 11:38:03 AM
In response to your notification letter dated 10/12—we object to the rezoning of this area to
accommodate more housing.
Ronald Spicer and Jo Ann Snyder Spicer
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
Page 208
From: Scott Coll
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Phoenix Sonoran Preserve - Taylor Morrison/Macewan480 Rezoning Proposal
Date: Wednesday, November 07, 2018 1:57:16 PM
Hello Desert View VPC,
Just wanted to share that I hope there will be a vote to NOT Rezone a portion of the Phoenix
Sonoran Preserve to allow for a large scale neighborhood build to be completed within its
borders. My reasons for this hope are as follows:
1) Current road infrastructure: Sonoran Desert Dr/Dove Valley Rd is already at capacity for
the surrounding neighborhoods that are already built and/or under construction on the Cave
Creek side and the North Valley PKWY side of the Preserve. Two New Large neighborhoods
within 8-9 miles of this proposed neighborhood, USAA (located at Happy Valley/19th
Ave/North Valley Pkwy) and Sky Crossing (also being built by Taylor Morrison and other
builders located at Deer Valley and Black Mountain Blvd) will already clog access to
roadways that would be used to access this neighborhood and the Preserve (North Valley
Pkwy, 19th Ave, 7th St, Deer Valley, Tatum Rd, Pinnacle Peak Rd, Black Mountain Blvd,
Cave Creek). I feel modifying, by expansion, the existing Sonoran Desert Dr/Dove Valley Rd
navigating through the Preserve would drastically take away from any tranquility, and limit
even more the Natural/Organic Desert Landscape we have there now.
2) Night Sky Viewing: Would become non-existent with the increased vehicle traffic of the
new neighborhood. You'd have home-owners, and then any friends/family that visit and also
delivery traffic bringing light pollution and vehicle pollution to the Preserve area.There is also
the street lights and home ambient lighting from that many homes, approximately 1,420, that
will effect Desert Flora/Fauna and their way of life. Road noise as well from so much increase
in traffic could also cause an issue.
3) Safety: 3A: I've already observed in the last year multiple accidents at the Northbound
intersection of Cave Creek and Sonoran Desert Dr due to a backup of vehicles trying to turn
left on to Sonoran Desert Dr. I come home this way every day from work and have noticed a
substantial increase in traffic as far back as the AZ-51/Loop 101/Black Mtn Blvd interchange.
Then the same down Deer Valley or Pinnacle Peak, and then Cave Creek. Cave Creek
subsequently then backs up at Tatum due to the left lane being stopped due to a number of
vehicles turning left at Sonoran Desert Dr and terrible accidents occur due to people not
observing the slow down or being impatient. The severity of these accidents on Cave Creek,
and subsequent difficulty for First Responders to access the area, then cut off access altogether
to the Preserve and cause a massive re-route in traffic, if even possible.
3B: Cyclists will also have more risk along Cave Creek/Sonoran Desert Dr/Dove Valley Rd
due to increased vehicle traffic with this new neighborhood. I know City of Phoenix is
working to expand bike routes across the city, but this area is vital to the cycling community
by providing easily navigable routes that connect and are, for now, easily seen by motorists
driving in these areas to prevent any accidents from occurring.
3C: Adding more people to a Preserve environment will then make the Preserve itself unsafe.
It will become subject to vandalism from littering, illegal trespassing by motorized vehicles, or
even walking/hiking on unapproved trails (trail-blazing) and ruining crucial desert life that
takes years to grow. We need to Tread Lightly (https://www.treadlightly.org/) with this
proposed neighborhood and think of the lasting effects that it could bring, not only to us and
Page 209
our current daily living, but also the flora/fauna trying to live in the Preserve too.
4) Alternatives to a Neighborhood: Just because it is Private Land, doesn't mean you need to
grant them the Rezoning change to build a new neighborhood. If a Community Center was
proposed that educates persons on Desert life, and what it means to preserve this Natural
environment and improve our way of life (educational) by teaching of the past environment
that was Phoenix and the sprawling desert oasis and mountains from 100 years ago, that would
be something worth certainly entertaining for our section of the Valley. There isn't very many,
if any, of these types of facilities in our North Gateway Community that I'm aware of that aim
at educating our youth, and even ourselves, of what is around us and also what used to be
around us regarding the environment. A Desert Mountain Museum in this area would be a
welcome alternative rather than another large neighborhood decreasing our Desert Mountain
Landscape.
Hopefully I haven't ranted too long, and this letter will help aid in your decision to NOT
approve of the Rezoning of this section of the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve. This letter has also
been forwarded to Vice Mayor Jim Waring, Phoenix City Council District 2 Representative.
Kindest Regards,
Scott Coll
Sonoran Commons Community Member
Page 210
From: Adam Grant
To: Kaelee Wilson
Subject: FW: Rezoning of PSP
Date: Friday, November 09, 2018 8:00:30 AM
From: Jim Waring [mailto:Jim@JimWaring.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 1:14 PM
To: Adam Grant
Nicholas T Cappellini
Subject: Fwd: Rezoning of PSP
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: hporourke@gmail.com
Date: November 8, 2018 at 8:48:11 AM MST
To: info@jimwaring.com
Subject: Rezoning of PSP
Hi!
I do NOT support the rezoning of the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve to allow for the
addition of more homes.
Respectfully your constituent,
Holly O’Rourke
Page 211
From: Jean Ann Rippe
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Phoenix Sonoran Preserve
Date: Thursday, November 08, 2018 9:29:53 AM
Good morning,
My name is Jean Ann and I am a resident of Phoenix. The Phoenix Sonoran Preserve is my
favorite place in the city to escape the craziness of daily life. I am writing you to ask you to
please NOT recommend the rezoning of the PSP. I appreciate your time and consideration.
Best regards,
Jean Ann
Page 212
From: Trudy Taylor
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Mac Ewen 480. Taylor Morrison
Date: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 10:30:39 AM
I am most concerned with the proposed development near Sonoran Preserve
Where are these builders getting the water????
I think we are having far too many developments in the north valley
We enjoy biking and hiking from the Apache trailhead and it is most disconcerting to see the beautiful view being
marred by builders
Please save our preserves and open spaces!!!
Thank you
Trudy Taylor
Sent from my iPad
Page 213
From: Gary Kirkilas II
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Sonoran Desert Preserve Rezoning and Desert Character Overlay District
Date: Friday, November 30, 2018 6:15:42 PM
Hello Desert View Planning Committee,
My name is Dr. Gary Kirkilas and I am a pediatrician at Phoenix Children's
Hospital. I am also a Phoenix Park Steward for the Sonoran Desert Preserve. I was
very disheartened to see that Taylor Morrison is asking to rezone 488 acres of
privately owned land from a S-1 to PUD so that they can develop a high density
housing development. It is equally disturbing that they are seeking to modify and
remove the Desert Character Overlay District for over 638 acres! As you may be
aware the Sonoran Desert Master Plan was developed by in 1998 and took over 10
years of collaborated work with the Phoenix Parks Dept and ASU to develop. The
Master Plan called for low density housing developments and to retain the Desert
Character Overlay District.
Allowing this rezoning to pass as well as modifying/removal of the Desert
Character Overlay District will drastically change the look and feel of this beautiful
Desert Preserve.
There are logistic concerns as well to this development. Several citizens who live in
the area are already witnessing traffic congestion along Sonoran Desert Drive and
Dove Valley Road. Adding the proposed 1400 homes to the mix will only worsen
the traffic situation even further....leaving a headache for citizens and our elect
officials to deal with once Taylor Morrisson has move on to another project.
I beg you to reconsider allowing the rezoning and removal for the Desert Character
Overlay District. Once the development begins the Desert Preserve will never look
or feel the same way again. I would be happy to discuss further or meet with you in
person.
Most Sincerely,
Dr. Gary Kirkilas
Page 214
From: Sue Pierce
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Proposed Dense Residential Development by Taylor Morrison Along Sonoran Desert Drive
Date: Tuesday, December 04, 2018 12:41:58 PM
Dear Desert View Village Members,
I am emailing you to express my concerns regarding a proposed development by Taylor
Morrison along Sonoran Desert Drive. I have many objections to this possible development
which I hope in the future we will be able to discuss in person or on the phone. However, for
now, let me begin with a discussion of traffic issues.
I live in Sonoran Foothills in a community called Desert Enclave. We have one entrance into
our community and that is from Dove Valley Road. Dove Valley Road at that point goes from a
four- lane road to a two-lane road with traffic going east and west.
During each work day, Monday through Friday, rush hour traffic (7:00 am – 9:00 am and 4:30
pm – 6:30 pm approximately) causes a long line of bumper to bumper vehicles to form making
entry onto Dove Valley Road difficult and at times dangerous. We have counted as many as
100 cars in a line during those times and have both pictures and videos of this traffic to share.
The addition of a dense residential development to the east near Apache Trailhead would only
complicate the problem. The developer’s attorney noted that they have some money in the
budget to improve traffic in the immediate area around Apache Trailhead but that would have
no positive impact on roadways in our area. The extension of the 303 East from Highway 17 to
Cave Creek Road could be a solution but it is my understanding funds for that project have not
been allocated nor will be in the near future.
It is my request that you support us in opposing this development. If you would like to discuss
it in greater detail, I am available at your convenience.
Thank you,
Sue Pierce
Sue Pierce
Founder/CEO
Pierce Energy Planning
(480) 773-0035 | sue@energyplanning.org
Please consider the environment before printing.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and
may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If
Page 215
you are not the intended recipient of this message or if this message has been addressed to you in error,
please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or
storage of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.
Page 216
From: Blake Austin
Subject: Apache Wash Trails - New Homes Concern
Date: Saturday, December 15, 2018 1:41:19 PM
I am writing this email to voice my concern for the proposed plans with Taylor Morrison to
build 1400 new homes and jeopardize more of our beautiful mountain biking and hiking
community.
Please DENY Taylor Morrison.
Thank you,
Blake Austin
480-341-7543
Page 217
From: robertfletcher67@aim.com
To: Council District 2 PCC; JIM@JIMWARING.COM; PDD Desert View VPC; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: SAVE OUR SONORAN PRESERVE
Date: Sunday, December 16, 2018 6:27:58 AM
As a user of the Apache Wash Trailhead I would like to express my
concern regarding Taylor Morrison’s plan to construct, in a concentrated
manner, 1,400 homes on a 400+ acre parcel of land.
My concerns are the impact this would have on:
1. Traffic issues including the safety of hikers, bicyclists and walkers.
2. The integrity of the Sonoran Preserve Masterplan
3. Water use
4. Wildlife safety
5. Flood control
Please do not allow the integrity of the Sonoran Preserve to deteriorate
by allowing Taylor Morrison’s plan to be implemented.
Best Regards,
Bob
Page 218
From: Lance Morgan
To: Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Sonoran preserve rezoning vote
Date: Saturday, December 29, 2018 9:58:15 AM
Good morning, I hope you have had a delightful holiday season. On a recent visit to the
Apache wash hiking area I learned about the proposed Taylor Morrison development. In my
opinion this is a shocking and horrible idea. My main thought is this; where else in phoenix
can you drive down a truly scenic byway? Once you head West off of Cave Creek road, your
taken back to a time of free open space, the way Phoenix used to be. You really get a sense of
a peaceful easy feeling (not trying to plagiarize the eagles, but you know what I mean).
This section of the sonoran preserve is just beautiful, with its tall saguaros, fields of jumping
cholla, vast expansive views, creeks and washes and not to mention the wildlife. I'm afraid if
the development on the south side of the hiking area is allowed to move forward, this area
will lose more that just its visual aspects, but it will leave an indelible mark on the psyche of all
who currently visit this area.
Moreover, I have a sense that we are moving into a slower economic time, not only globally,
but perhaps locally. Rates are rising and less people will be able to afford these potentially
expensive homes. This will not be green economic growth. We've seen this before; a large
home builder plows hundreds of acres of land, to only have it sit vacant for years because of
an economic downturn.
lastly, We need to stand up to these deep pocket home builders who are insistent on building
these cookie cutter subdivisions, that disrupt all in their path. We need to preserve areas like
this and not make the same bad decision as before, not only for us to enjoy, but for our
younger generations.
that being said, I would rather make the right decision and be unpopular with the home
builders, than to make the wrong decision and be unpopular the the voting base and residents
of district 2.
I thank you in advance for making the right decision and voting no for this rezoning proposal.
Kind regards,
Lance Morgan
4230 East Danbury road
Phoenix, AZ 85032
Page 219
From: Lance Morgan
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Sonoran preserve
Date: Saturday, December 29, 2018 9:54:52 AM
Good morning, I hope you have had a delightful holiday season. On a recent visit to the
Apache wash hiking area I learned about the proposed Taylor Morrison development. In my
opinion this is a shocking and horrible idea. My main thought is this; where else in phoenix
can you drive down a truly scenic byway? Once you head West off of Cave Creek road, your
taken back to a time of free open space, the way Phoenix used to be. You really get a sense of
a peaceful easy feeling (not trying to plagiarize the eagles, but you know what I mean).
This section of the sonoran preserve is just beautiful, with its tall saguaros, fields of jumping
cholla, vast expansive views, creeks and washes and not to mention the wildlife. I'm afraid if
the development on the south side of the hiking area is allowed to move forward, this area
will lose more that just its visual aspects, but it will leave an indelible mark on the psyche of all
who currently visit this area.
Moreover, I have a sense that we are moving into a slower economic time, not only globally,
but perhaps locally. Rates are rising and less people will be able to afford these potentially
expensive homes. This will not be green economic growth. We've seen this before; a large
home builder plows hundreds of acres of land, to only have it sit vacant for years because of
an economic downturn.
lastly, We need to stand up to these deep pocket home builders who are insistent on building
these cookie cutter subdivisions, that disrupt all in their path. We need to preserve areas like
this and not make the same bad decision as before, not only for us to enjoy, but for our
younger generations.
that being said, I would rather make the right decision and be unpopular with the home
builders, than to make the wrong decision and be unpopular the the voting base and residents
of district 2.
I thank you in advance for making the right decision and voting no for this rezoning proposal.
Kind regards,
Lance Morgan
4230 East Danbury road
Phoenix, AZ 85032
Page 220
From: Annette Cline
To: Kaelee Wilson; council.district2@phoenix.gov
Subject: Housing development on Sonoran Drive
Date: Monday, December 31, 2018 4:52:44 PM
It has come to our attention that the company Taylor Morrison is proposing to build a high
density housing development on Sonoran Drive. We are avid hikers and lifelong Arizona
residents. We treasure the preserves, parks and hiking trails and remain residents of the
Valley in large part for the natural beauty and outdoor activities.We have hiked in this
beautiful natural area. We feel that this plan puts not only the integrity of the Sonoran
Preserve at stake but also the wildlife and quality of life of the neighboring families.
Putting in this development is morally wrong as the The Desert Preserve Master Plan called
for low density housing within the context of Desert character overlay District. We are both
strongly against allowing this proposed development.
Annette and Steve Cline
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
From: Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Rezoning Requst MacEwan 480 Dilemma - PMPC
Date: Monday, January 14, 2019 5:24:36 AM
Attachments: Rezoning Request_MacEwan 480 Dilemna_PMPC.pdf
Village of Desert View and Ms. Kaelee Wilson;
The Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council (PMPC), a 501-c4 nonprofit
organization charged with the protection of Phoenix Mountains Desert
Preserves writes to you in strong opposition to the proposed MacEwen 480
PUD Application dated December 22, 2018. PMPC has been a determined
voice in support of the Phoenix Mountain Preserve and the Sonoran Desert
Preserve since 1970.
PMPC has studied the Proposed Taylor Morrison Planned Unit Development
(PUD) to “up zone” the 488 acre Site south of the Sonoran Desert Drive
between the Cave Creek and Apache Washes and also incorporating the
smaller Mesquite Wash.
As the project that will set a precedent for all future development within the
Sonoran Preserve, PMPC asks that a density much closer to the S-1 and 35,000
square feet per residence be maintained. That ALL of the requirements of the
Edge Guidelines and the Desert Character Overlay District be maintained in
the development of the Master Plan. PMPC also asks that representatives
from our organization be included in the design process as the MacEwen 480
becomes designed.
See attached – Rezoning Request_MacEwan 480 Dilemma
Sincerely,
Patrick McMullen, PhD
PMPC President
PMPC : 12950 N. 7th St. Phoenix, AZ 85022
www.phoenixmountains.org
Page 225
From: Howard Myers
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Z‐62‐18‐2
Date: Saturday, January 19, 2019 9:29:16 PM
Desert View Village Planning Committee members
I am writing you in reference to case Z‐62‐18‐2, The MacEwen 480 master planned
community, in the village of Desert View. It is a request for a major increase in allowed
density on 472.3 acres of land located in the Cave Creek wash flood plain and surrounded by
the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve and other undeveloped desert land.
While I do not live in Phoenix, I do live in the Sonoran desert in north Scottsdale and have
worked over 20 years with the city on their Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance
(ESLO), on their McDowell Sonoran Preserve, and on flooding issues with both the city and
the Maricopa County Flood Control District so I have a lot of experience with the desert and
development in it. The city of Scottsdale was way ahead of its time with the ESLO which
protected property with its rules on drainage and maintaining washes and also protected the
fragile desert environment by requiring all property owners to dedicate 25% to 80% of their
property to natural open space as a function of slope. That protection of the desert allows
residents to really connect with their environment and live with it instead of trying to
transform it into something else. As a result water usage is far lower because most of the land
contains natural vegetation which survives without any human interference and irrigation.
Also wildlife is protected and enjoyed by residents, again living in harmony with the
environment. Many of the county and Phoenix residents I talk to, who live in these northern
areas, wish the county and Phoenix would adopt similar regulations that wind up benefitting
both residents and the natural environment. It also makes development sustainable, even in
drought conditions like we are facing now.
So that brings us to this proposed development which is almost the exact opposite of this
philosophy. It jams so many houses into the desert that the natural environment disappears,
and then to make it worse they intend to add non native vegetation that requires a lot of water.
This development also has a major wash going through the middle of it and borders others
including the Cave Creek wash which carries a lot of water from a huge drainage to the north.
All the non-pervious surfaces will cause far more runoff from this property which will have to
be controlled. In addition, due to the density, there is no room for water to flow around the
structures which would mitigate some of the flooding issues. So drainage and flood control
will become issues with it. The same is true for wildlife. This area should have a lot of wildlife
because of the washes which are major corridors, and the Phoenix Preserve, but there is no
room for them to move though this development. The open space required in the ESLO
provides these corridors and the natural vegetation wildlife need. Scottsdale’s General Plan
also calls for the lowest possible density adjacent to the McDowell Sonoran Preserve to
maintain wildlife corridors and minimize the impact of development on the Preserve.
This development is an island in the desert, isolated by washes with only one possible access,
the Desert Sonoran Drive which will have to carry ALL of the traffic from this development.
The Desert Sonoran Drive was supposed to be a scenic drive through the desert, now it will be
a major conduit for all these homes. Also, all those cars will have to go to either Cave Creek
Road, or through the neighborhoods to the west, there are no other options. The Desert
Sonoran Drive will also have to carry all the water and waste water infrastructure, and none of
Page 226
that is close, increasing the city’s expenses in servicing this development. A single point of
entry for over 1400 homes is also a huge problem. A secondary access was shown, but it also
intersects with the Desert Sonoran Drive and really comes into the development at about the
same place as the main one so any disruption in that area, or past it, isolates all the other
homes.
This is just another case of a developer trying to jam as many houses as they can on to a
property without any consideration of the impact on the environment, other residents, and the
city. A reasonable number of homes, 500 or less, would allow it to be developed in a more
responsible manner, would allow it to be in harmony with the environment instead of in
opposition to it, and would have a less negative impact on all the surrounding uses, including
the Phoenix Preserve.
I hope you will consider the impact of what is proposed and as a minimum scale it back to
something reasonable. The developer will still make plenty of money, the eventual inhabitants
of this development will enjoy their homes much more, and everyone else, who lives near it or
travels through it, will be better off.
Thank you for your attention in this matter.
Howard Myers
President of Protect Our Preserve, president of the Carriage Trails HOA, and participant in
many city boards, commissions, and citizen committees over the past 23 years including
updates to the ESLO and General Plan.
--
Howard Myers
Home:
Addr: 6631 E. Horned Owl Trail
Scottsdale, AZ 85266-8511
Phone: 480-473-0109 (home)
480-262-3502 (Cell)
E-mail: howard.myers@cox.net
If you have any other e-mail or phone numbers for me, please use the Home
information above instead.
None of the previous work e-mail or work phone numbers are valid anymore
Page 227
From: daniel.centilli
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Cc: jim@jimwaring.con; northvalleymultisport@googlegroups.com
Subject: Sonoran Desert Preserve, proposed Development
Date: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 8:15:51 PM
Attachments: Screenshot_2019-02-19-18-52-09.png
Dear Neighbors and Teammates,
My name is Daniel Centilli. I am an airline pilot for Southwest Airlines, and a homeowner in
Desert Ridge. My wife is an MBA and a manager at Vanguard. We are well compensated and
politically active.
When I recently learned that there was a proposal to allow 1400 homes to be developed in the
parcel of land adjacent to the Apache Wash Trailhead at the Phoenix Sonoran Desert Preserve,
I was disgusted and angry. This is one of the last unspoiled open spaces of desert in the North
Valley. It is an area that many of my friends and neighbors use for recreation. We enjoy the
trails and bike lanes that are located along Sonoran Desert Parkway/Dove Valley. This
development will not only spoil some of the last, most beautiful desert in the north valley, but
will also lead to a dangerous increase in motor vehicle traffic along Sonoran Desert Parkway.
This segment of road is the most important uninterrupted stretch of bike infrastructure in the
north valley. It allows cyclists to connect safely from Cave Creek Road to Norterra and
Anthem. It one of the most utilized segments of bike lane infrasructure in Phoenix. I strongly
encourage you to view Strava's Heatmap, to view the evidence of this:
https://www.strava.com/heatmap#11.40/-112.05156/33.75318/hot/ride
This is a tool that allows you to see the combined activities of thousands of users of the fitness
application, Strava. Strava has been used in civil planning applications in regards to
determining where bicycling lanes are needed, and more importantly, in THIS case, where
cyclists feel SAFE riding. We, as cyclists, currently feel safe riding along Sonoran Desert
Parkway. .I am a member of North Valley Multisport, a triathlon club operating out of the
Anthem, Tramanto, Desert Ridge, and Cave Creek areas. In fact, North Valley Multisport is
actually the Adopt a Road sponsor of a significant stretch of Dove Valley/Sonoran Desert
Parkway.
One of the primary reasons I purchased an existing home in Desert Ridge was its proximity to
the Sonoran Desert Preserve. This is different than actually building adjacent to and disturbing
the preserve itself, as I believe that this development will do. Once this is done, it can NEVER
be undone.
I strongly oppose this development. Please consider the current users and future users of the
Sonoran Desert Preserve. This is a stunningly beautiful area that should be protected for future
generations.
I have attached several photos of this area, so that you can see for yourself the beauty of this
parcel of land. It should be preserved.
I intend to apply both social and financial resources to opposing this development, and any
publically elected offical that supports it.
Page 228
Sincerly,
Daniel Centilli
269 267 6630
Daniel.centilli@gmail.com
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone
Page 229
From: Karyn Lupfer
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Council District 2 PCC; jim@jimwaring.com
Subject: Proposed Taylor Morrison Housing Development
Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 6:33:31 AM
I just heard through my hiking group that there is a possibility for yet another housing
development to be built on desert land, and as a frequent user of the Sonoran Preserve up
there, I am so disappointed with this. The sonoran preserve is a beautiful area, and should be
left alone. There is already a development going in on the west side of the preserve. Adding
another housing development will be detrimental to the area and those who enjoy it. Part of
the draw of the area off of the apache wash trailhead is that you feel like you've escaped the
city life, without having to drive for hours. Not only will the noise during construction be an
issue but once there are people living there there will be more traffic in the area, making the
dangers for bikers along Sonoran desert drive higher. More traffic means extending the awful
air quality of Phoenix up to this area too, which we prefer this area to locations within the city
because the air quality is better. And then there will be the impact on the wildlife. The
preserve is home to many, many creatures. Bulldozing the desert homes of these animals to
build homes will displace them. Where will they go? How many will have to be killed because
they start eating people's pets and suddenly this brand new neighborhood has a "coyote
problem"? Please, please, do not let this development happen. If someone wants to buy a
home at the edge of the desert, there are already plenty of existing homes by preserves. Please,
leave some nature to nature.
Page 230
From: Karen Chen
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Rezoning
Date: Friday, February 22, 2019 3:52:40 PM
Please do not rezone allowing 1400 homes to be built right next to the Sonoran Desert Perserve.
Respectfully,
Karen Chen
Page 231
From: Mike Devito
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Taylor Morison Homes
Date: Saturday, February 23, 2019 7:41:57 PM
Hello,
I live in by the Sonoran Desert Preserve and I don't want to see 1400 homes right next to the Sonoran Desert
Preserve.
Thank you,
Mike De Vito
Page 232
From: Eric Idalski
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Sonoran Desert Preserve
Date: Saturday, February 23, 2019 5:33:55 PM
To whom it may concern,
I recently found out the plans to try to rezone an area adjacent to the Sonoran Desert Preserve. I wanted to email
you and advise I don't want to see 1400 homes right next to the Sonoran Desert Preserve.
Regards,
Eric Idalski
32706 N 18th Lane
Phoenix, AZ 85085
Sent from my iPhone
Page 233
From: Caitlin Leja
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: No houses
Date: Saturday, February 23, 2019 8:34:50 AM
I am a resident next to the Sonoran preserve. I am NOT in favor of 1400 houses being built next to the
preserve!!!! It will add traffic, congestion and take away from the beauty of the desert!
Caitlin Leja, M.S, CCC-SLP
Page 234
From: Kristi Terrio
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Apache trailhead, 1400 new houses
Date: Saturday, February 23, 2019 7:26:37 AM
Greetings,
I’m a resident of Carefree Crossings in Phoenix, 85085, and my backyard backs up to Dove Valley Rd. My family
and I utilize the Apache Wash Trailhead all year long. We are concerned over a builder-request to construct 1400
new houses directly to the East of the trailhead. This will cause issues to the already car-congested area, and will
ruin a beautiful outdoor destination for residents in North Phoenix (Sonoran Foothills, Tramonto, Desert Hills,
Anthem, Desert Ridge), Cave Creek, and North Scottsdale/Carefree.
Please contact me if you’d like to discuss this poor solution to urban growth. Please deny the builders request.
Sincerely,
Kristi Swift
Cell: 602-628-8838
Sent from my iPad
Page 235
From: Fran W
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: 1400 homes next to Sonoran Preserve
Date: Saturday, February 23, 2019 8:48:50 AM
We do not want to see 1400 homes next to the Sonoran Preserve
A removal of Desert Overlay zoning would completely undermine the vision and long term
plan created in the early 1990's for this area.
We live in Terravita and find Desert Overlay to distinguish our area from others to great,
desirable preference and benefit.
Ben and Fran Wylie
Page 236
From: Lincoln Burke
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Desired Rezoning of Sonoran Desert Preserve
Date: Sunday, February 24, 2019 8:54:20 PM
To Whom it May Concern
I am writing as a concerned resident of North Phoenix and active user of the Sonoran Desert Preserve. It has come
to my attention that Taylor Morrison owns 500 acres south of Sonoran Desert Parkway adjacent to the the Sonoran
Desert Preserve. It is my understanding that they are petitioning the City of Phoenix to have the area rezoned to
allow up to 1400+ homes built on the site. I want to strongly oppose this rezoning application.
While I would love for the entire area south of Sonoran Desert Drive to remain open desert land I do understand that
there will eventually be development in this area. My hope at this point is that I can assist in restricting the
development to only what is actually sustainable. I see multiple levels of problems with rezoning this area for
higher density. The first is water resources, there is no doubt that we are already stressing the existing water in the
area. The second, and far more important to me, is the strain on the school district. My daughters currently attend
Sonoran Foothills School. It has only been open for three years and is already overcrowded and has lost the pre-
school program that my girls both benefited from. Already there is a development by Taylor Morrison south of
SDD and just recently a plot of land due north of Sonoran Foothills School was purchased by Lennar. I am unaware
of the current zoning of that plot of land but be assured I will oppose any rezoning attempt by the developer there for
higher density as well.
I appreciate your time and consideration in this matter. Please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Lincoln Burke
Sent from my iPad
Sent from my iPad
Page 237
From: Christy Hart
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: I oppose the proposed housing development near Apache wash trailhead
Date: Monday, February 25, 2019 10:23:51 AM
I don't want to see 1400 home right next to the Sonoran Desert Preserve.
As a mountain biker and hiker, I look forward to the pristine views around when I
am enjoying the Preserve. The enormous amount of homes would add hazard to
cyclists and hikers with the increased traffic.
Christy Hart
Executive Consultant for Rodan + Fields
Use the Solution Tool to learn what the Doctors recommend for you!
christyrhart.myrandf.com
602-819-2307
Page 238
From: Karen Severance
To: Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Sonoran Preserve
Date: Thursday, February 28, 2019 8:59:07 PM
Dear Ms. Wilson,
Please don’t change the zoning in the Sonoran Preserve. Our ecosystem is delicately balanced, and the denser the
zoning, the more damage will be done. Our desert wildlife and flora have already been negatively impacted, not to
mention an infrastructure already stressed beyond its capacity.
Thank you for considering the future of our beautiful preserve.
Karen Severance
Page 239
TO: Phoenix City Council
& Desert View Village Planning Committee
FROM: Matthew Salenger, Head Collaborative Facilitator
Living Building Challenge Sonoran Collaborative
http://collaboratives.living-future.org/sonoran-collaborative/
DATE / TIME: 3/2/2019 3:50 PM
CC: file, AIA Arizona
SENT VIA: email
RE: Desert Preservation vs Development
Dear City Council Members & Desert View VPC-
Let me introduce our group: We are one of over 250 international collaboratives attempting to
provide greater sustainability in our communities through education and assistance with the
Living Building Challenge (LBC). The LBC is a project certification program, much like Leadership
in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), though far more wholistic and comprehensive. The
Sonoran Collaborative, of which I am the current Chair, is the LBC collaborative for our region.
I am writing you today in an effort to save more of our greatest economic asset: The natural
Sonoran Desert. It has been well documented our desert is the single largest pull for tourism. It is
also cited as a major draw by corporations moving to our region, as our climate and close-
proximity to preserves provides their employees with a high quality of life. Therefore, I wish to
request that you not grant a zoning change for a property surrounded by preserves, state and
county land. I am speaking specifically about a property of 473 acres shown on the attached map.
It has come to our attention a developer hopes to rezone this property in order to increase the
density allowed. Currently 400-500 homes are allowed, but the zoning sought would allow 1400+
homes. Either density would greatly damage the surrounding preserve through souring the view,
environmental damage through construction, and future home owners forging their own paths
through the preserve. The larger the density, the more damage will occur.
The LBC has 20 “imperatives” required to achieve full certification. The first imperative states:
Projects may only be built on greyfields or brownfields: previously developed sites that are not classified
as on or adjacent to any… sensitive ecological habitat. While it may not be the desire for these
developers to gain LBC certification, this imperative speaks to the universal truth that we should
not build on precious untouched native habitat. Why? Because doing so damages our own
economic, mental, and bodily health as well as that of fragile ecosystems around us.
The property in question is in a location that should never be developed. One look at the map
of its location shows this to be quite obvious. Our group would recommend the following:
1. The City of Phoenix purchase the land from the developer and designate it as part of
the adjacent preserve.
2. Barring #1, the City work with the State to purchase the land and designate it as part
of the adjacent preserve.
3. Barring #1 or #2, the City work (possibly with the State) to provide a land swap,
where the property in question becomes part of the preserve; and the developer
obtains an equally valuable piece of land adjacent to other existing development to
allow that development can be contiguous and the preserve can also be contiguous.
This will greatly reduce the impact development.
We hope you will consider working to avoid any development at the property in question.
Please save this preserve area.
Page 240
Lastly, I would like to mention these types of “leap-frog” developments are very damaging
and unsustainable, not only to the environment, but also to city coffers. They bring huge
infrastructure costs that will only increase over time, bringing financial hardship to the City of
Phoenix and the State. We would advocate for all future development to be limited within areas
without any un-touched land in order to help assure our continued ability to thrive as a metropolis.
In order to not over-burden our future, we need real leadership to recognize when decisions we
make now damage our economies in the future.
For more information on LBC: https://living-future.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Living-
Building-Challenge-3.0-Standard.pdf
For more information on our regional collaborative: http://collaboratives.living-
future.org/sonoran-collaborative/
Thank you for your consideration.
Matthew Salenger, AIA, coLAB studio, llc
Co-LBCSC Facilitators and additional signees: Sonja Bochart, IIDA, LEED AP BD&C, WELL
AP, Shepley Bulfinch; Premnath Sundharam, Global Sustainability Leader, DLR Group; Jeff
Stanton, Smith Group; Ashley Mulhall, AIA, LEED AP BD+C, WELL AP, Orcutt Winslow
Page 241
From: Mike L
To: Council District 2 PCC; PDD Desert View VPC; saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com
Subject: Housing Density Change
Date: Sunday, March 3, 2019 6:57:12 PM
Hello,
As a frequent mountain biker / hiker at Apache Wash trailhead I’ve followed with mixed
interest and dismay the encroachment of subdivisions on the surrounding areas.
Today I learned that Taylor Morrison is proposing to increase the density beyond that allowed
in the 1998 Master Plan.
Your feedback is welcomed as I educate myself with an eye to resisting this development and
its unwelcome impacts.
Thank you,
Mike Looney
--
Mike
Page 242
From: ALLENFAMTX
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Sonoran Desert Preserve S-1 Zoning
Date: Monday, March 4, 2019 4:17:09 PM
Dear Planning Committee,
We are homeowners in the Stonebridge at Dynamite Mountain Ranch subdivision. Please accept this email
as notice that I do not approve or support modification of the S-1 Zoning at the Sonoran Desert Preserve.
The planners got it right the first time and I support maintain S-1 Zoning. No hardship = No change!
Allowing 1400 homes to be built in this area will absolutely violate the beauty of the area, the already
compromised eco-system of our desert, and the original intent of city planners.
Please save our Preserve!!!!
Kristi & Lawrence Allen
1929 W Duane Ln, Phoenix, Az 85085
mobile: 281-658-8654
Page 243
From: Mary Caton
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Council District 2 PCC; jim@jimwaring.com
Subject: Apache Wash Trailhead - Vote NO on 1400 homes
Date: Monday, March 4, 2019 1:44:40 PM
Hello
I spend a lot of time hiking and biking in Apache Wash recreational area and think it is a bad
idea to change the zoning to allow for more density of homes. This area does not need 1400
homes near the trail head as opposed to the current 500 homes zoning. I do not support the
request from Taylor Homes to increase from 500 homes to 1400 homes. Please help protect
our natural areas from too much development and vote no to the request to rezone.
Thank you
Mary Caton
Page 244
From: flaxgulch@aol.com
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Opinion from local resident for your consideration
Date: Monday, March 4, 2019 2:28:31 PM
As a resident I don't want to see 1400 homes right next to the Sonoran Desert Preserve.
LaVonne Lindall\
6701 East Tanya Road
Cave Creek, AZ 85331
Page 245
From: Gail Martinelli
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Sonora Preserve
Date: Monday, March 4, 2019 4:39:15 PM
As a resident I don't want to see 1400 homes right next to the Sonoran
Desert Preserve. There is to much building happening in our area. Please
keep the original S-1 zoning plan which only allowed low-density housing at
the MacEwan 480 zoning proposal.
Thank you,
Gail Martinelli
Page 246
From: righins mtb
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Council District 2 PCC; jim@jimwaring.com
Subject: NO to 1400 homes next to Sonoran Preserve
Date: Monday, March 4, 2019 9:37:07 PM
Ladies and Gentlemen
we have a lot of examples of how bad urban planning can destroy the environment and the
quality of life . We do not need to keep making the same mistake over and over. Bringing
1400 high-density homes to be close to the Sonoran Preserve will create caos in a peaceful
area, will affect the life of several animals, will destroy the beauty of the desert and will
mislead people that buy the homes.
There was a reason for having a "Sonoran Preserve Master Plan" and there is a reason for
allowing only low density development. Lets stick to the plan!
Home developers are only concerned with the money they make. The less infrastructure they
create the better. Thus high density is their choice. The problem is that those that build the
development do not stay there to leave in the caos they create.
Regards
Ricardo
Page 247
From: Steve Swerid
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Zoning
Date: Monday, March 4, 2019 6:33:20 AM
Hi Jim,
Again, please note
"As a resident I don't want to see 1400 homes right next to the Sonoran Desert Preserve.
Please keep the original S-1 zoning plan which only allowed low-density housing at the
MacEwan 480 zoning proposal."
Steve
Sent from my iPhone
Page 248
From: Steve Swerid
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Zoning
Date: Monday, March 4, 2019 6:32:07 AM
Good morning,
As a resident in Sonoran Foothills I would like to express my opinion AGAINST the high density zoning initiative.
We purchased our home in a beautiful neighbourhood with large homes and access to nature and open spaces. I
understand the need to progress however, changing from low density to high density is an ongoing trend that is
taking away from the beauty of the desert and quite frankly is reducing the value of our homes.
I don’t want to live beside apartments complexes and gas stations.
The city overbuilt and realized a crash not a decade ago and it seems like we are chasing this same animal again.
We need parks, open spaces, high end grocery stores and restaurants and not the continuous box stores and mini
strip malls offering the same old options of fast food, nail shops and pet stores.
We purchased our home because of the beautiful and discriminating neighbourhoods, pathway systems, green
spaces, privacy and security.
Please DO NOT rezone our area to high density.
Steve
Sent from my iPhone
Page 249
From: Michelle Wedsworth
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Council District 2 PCC; jim@jimwaring.com
Subject: Apache Wash Trailhead - Vote NO on 1400 homes
Date: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 2:56:57 PM
Hello
My family and I are active users of the Apache Wash and are not supportive of the
Taylor Morrison request to place 1400 homes adjacent the trail head. The land is
zoned for 500 homes for a reason and we do not support it going from 500 to 1400.
Please help protect the park and those who use it and vote no to the request to
rezone.
Thank you for your consideration. Michelle Wedsworth
Page 250
From: Kathy Allison
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: ‘Save Our Sonoran Preserve Phoenix’
Date: Friday, March 8, 2019 6:45:59 PM
‘Save Our Sonoran Preserve Phoenix’
Please don’t develop this land - it is needed to reserve our desert. Not to mention the noise
and pollution.
Concerned citizen
Page 251
From: Deborah Moore
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Cc: debtoon1@yahoo.com
Subject: Sonoran desert parkway
Date: Saturday, March 9, 2019 10:27:35 AM
I am a concerned citizen who lives near the land set aside for everyone to enjoy. If a developer builds 1,400 homes
that road will be a nightmare and the beauty will be ruined. Please stop the rezoning for development . Think of
future generations who will not know the beauty we are enjoying now .
Sincerely,
Deborah Moore
4518 East Bajada Rd
Cave Creek 85331
Sent from my iPhone
Page 252
From: nicoletti@cox.net
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: To the Desert View Planning Committee
Date: Saturday, March 9, 2019 4:45:06 PM
Importance: High
Hello
I’m a frequent Apache Wash hiker and it’s come to my attention that a home developer – Taylor
Morrison, is proposing to build 1400 homes on private land just east of the Apache Wash Trailhead.
This will require a rezoning of low-density development (500 homes) to a high density development
(1400 homes.) The Sonoran Preserve Masterplan (February 17, 1998) specifically states that
neighboring development is to be low-density.
I have many concerns about how this development will negatively impact the Preserve through a
high volume of traffic, noise, water usage, wildlife interruptions, flood control and many other
impacts.
I hope you will consider not approving the rezoning request so that the Preserve will be enjoyed as it
is meant to be.
Thank you.
Susan Nicoletti
480.419.9373
Scottsdale, 85266
nicoletti@cox.net
Page 253
From: SUZANNE RAY
To: Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Save Our Sonoran Preserve Phoenix
Date: Sunday, March 10, 2019 1:59:54 PM
Dear Ms. Wilson,
I am writing in response to the MacEwan 480/Taylor Morrison application (Cases Z-62-18-2; Z-
TA-5-18-2; and Z-75-18-2). As a resident of the Sonoran Foothills community, my quality of life
will be significantly impacted by rezoning this area to build 1400 homes with no buffer or
significant set-backs from the road or the Preserve. I am advocating to maintain S-1 low
density residential zoning. The integrity of the Sonoran Preserve is at stake as the Sonoran
Preserve Masterplan specifically notes a neighboring development is to be low density.
Increasing density creates negative impacts: this parcel of land has high value with regard to
habitat and water resources; and with regard to recreation, will detract from the user
experience. Increasing density also will increase the already present daily traffic congestion.
As I observed with the construction of Sonoran Gate, another Taylor Morrison community
along Sonoran Desert Drive/Dove Valley Road, the litter and garbage from construction trucks
and workers was abominable. As an endurance athlete who uses Sonoran Desert Drive/Dove
Valley Road and the Preserve daily, I fear for my safety with the dramatic increase in traffic
that will be the result of rezoning this area to allow for all this construction.
I appreciate your consideration in this matter and hope you will conclude the necessity to
maintain S-1 low density residential zoning of this precious area.
Sincerely,
Suzanne J. Ray
suzanne_squires@msn.com
1709 West Burnside Trail, Phoenix, Arizona, 85085
480-332-2943
Page 254
From: Ralph Ray
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Kaelee Wilson; jim@jimwaring.com
Subject: Save Our Sonoran Preserve
Date: Thursday, March 14, 2019 2:32:28 PM
I am writing in response to the MacEwan 480/Taylor Morrison application to rezone the area on the
south side of Sonoran Desert road and build over 1400 homes in this area. I, like so many of my
neighbors, moved to the Sonoran Foothills community to be near this beautiful desert, and to be
able to cycle in a safe manner without cars crossing over the bike lane to turn onto or from Sonoran
Desert or Dove Valley roads. Adding a housing community of that size, and all of the cars and traffic
congestion that would come with it will ruin this area. The traffic during rush hour now is already
bad, with cars backed up on Sonoran Desert trying to turn onto Cave Creek in the morning, and
sometimes all the way back to Jomax in the afternoon, waiting to turn from Cave Creek onto
Sonoran Desert. The original zoning plan for this area to be low density was and is still the correct
plan for this area. I am not asking for no growth, just to keep the zoning as is, and not destroy this
rare, beautiful Preserve that so many people enjoy every day.
I appreciate your consideration in this very important matter.
Ralph Ray
1709 W Burnside Trl
Phoenix, AZ 85085
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
Page 255
From: jean brady
To: PDD Desert View VPC; jim@jimwaring.com
Subject: Sonoran Preserve
Date: Friday, March 22, 2019 11:13:27 AM
I personally drive the beautiful Sonoran Desert Drive several times a week on the way to my
sister's apartment. The zone changing notification signs are so ridiculously placed, that it is
virtually impossible to see what they say from the road. Even if you pulled over, which is no
easy feat, you cannot read them from the road; you need to walk through the terrain to read
what they say. Purposeful, most definitely. Not only are they quite a distance from the road,
they are also turned facing Cave Creek Road, rather than Sonoran Desert Drive. Definitely
purposeful. I have never seen these signs posted in such a way, have you? I've seen
thousands of them, never posted so strategically placed. Does no one check the placement of
these signs, to be sure they are actually posted and the manner in which they are placed?
1400 homes??? Seriously?? Who is approving this? Where will the more than 2000 cars go?
Another zoning change? Unbelievable!
Jean Brady
5338 E Milton Drive
Cave Creek AZ 85331
Page 256
From: Mary Jo Hardy
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: MacEwan480 /Taylor Morrison rezoning request
Date: Saturday, March 23, 2019 3:42:13 PM
Representatives,
My husband and I have just completed a wonderful bike ride in the Sonoran Reserve. Three days ago, we took a
beautiful hike there with friends. We were very surprised and saddened to find out that there is a possibility that this
jewel in northern Phoenix is in danger of being changed forever.
The current zoning and Master Plan has allowed moderate development while protecting the desert environment.
This has created a wonderful area for the enjoyment of thousands of residents and visitors.
Please do not put corporate profits ahead of the natural beauty and quality of life that the Sonoran Preserve provides
to all citizens!
The Preserve was created after careful consideration and planning. Do not change that now!
Thank you.
Mary Jo Hardy
Okemos, MI
(Frequent visitor to the Phoenix area!)
Sent from my iPhone
Page 257
From: Kelly Leone
To: PDD Desert View VPC; jim@jimwaring.com; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Taylor Morrison Rezoning request
Date: Sunday, March 24, 2019 11:19:05 AM
Dear Councilman Waring, Village Members, and Miss Wilson,
I plead with you to deny the MacEwan 480/ Taylor Morissison request for rezoning of property on the Sonoran
Parkway in North Phoenix. When the Preserve was created, zoning was thoughtfully and carefully designated for
nature and neighborhoods.
Approval of 947 extra homes will have an affect of more than just number of homes built. Included in reasons to
reconsider are:
1. Excessive amounts of traffic on Cave Creek Rd, 101 loop, I17, and Tatum Blvd.
2. Lack of amenities to support homes and families residing in them (including grocery stores and medical
facilities).
3. Lack of schools, will new schools and or district be created?
4. Sonoran Parkway will not be as biker/pedestrian friendly. Increased dangers for both.
5. Will change the entire landscape of the Preserve. When Phoenix advertises out of state I imagine they show our
natural beauty and not rows and rows of cookie cutter homes.
6. The impact of additional pollution from the physical building of extra homes along with the families residing in
them.
7. Affect on the natural washes.
8. Affect on the indigenous wildlife and plants.
9. Does Phoenix and Taylor Morrison want to look like liars, cheaters and shady operators by going against
previously planned and approved designations?
As a resident, home owner, tax payer and lover of Arizona I again ask that you deny the MacEwan/Taylor Morrison
request to rezone on Sonoran Parkway and maintain S1 and Desert Overlay Zoning.
Sincerely,
Kelly Leone
Sent from my iPad
Page 258
From: dave@cavena.net
To: Council District 2 PCC
Cc: PDD Desert View VPC; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Sonoran Preserve
Date: Monday, March 25, 2019 9:42:51 PM
Sir:
We live in Tramonto. I hike in North Hills almost every weekend, and 3-4 evenings/week on my way
home from work in Tempe. This evening I finished after dark, using my headlamp the last mile or
two. I drive to-from work via Dove Valley/Sonoran Desert highway. The desert surrounding the hills
and their great trails are quiet, calming, nice. Phoenix has done amazing things with these trails –
don’t despoil them with yet more homes we don’t need here.
I have seen the signs up to change the zoning, creating yet another development in the middle of
this spectacular desert. We don’t need this. We locals don’t WANT it. No reason exists from
standpoints of density, space, view - it’s flat and no one will have any sort of view from their home to
write home about – yet the view from both South Hills and North Hills, as well as from the scenic
drive that is the Sonoran Desert Highway / Dove Valley Road, will be forever stained by this
repetition of the development a couple of miles west of this new proposal. Another rectangle of
walks, houses, streets plopped down in the midst of a beautiful desert landscape.
It’s just another scar on the land, another need for water and sewage in a pristine area.
The Preserve wasn’t created, nor the trails created and maintained, to just look at yet another
housing development. It was created to give us all a break from housing developments, and
remembrance of what the Valley is really about.
Please vote against this, and for leaving the desert as it is in and around the Preserve.
Regards,
Dave Cavena
dave@cavena.net
626-818-0313 (m)
626-812-0930 (o)
Page 259
From: johannes marais
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Cc: johannam0916@gmail.com; nukemanmaximus@gmail.com; Bettina Marais
Subject: Apache wash/Taylor Morrison
Date: Monday, March 25, 2019 10:53:49 AM
Dear Kaelee and Colleagues: My family and I have been using the Apache wash area for hiking and mountain
biking since 2007 (prior to area being developed for recreation). We strongly feel that Taylor Morrison’s proposed
development of 1,400 high density homes in the area of the Apache wash trail will be greatly detrimental to the
ecosystem and the public who loves to use the fabulous recreational infrastructure the city of Phoenix has put in
place there. This development will add at least 1,400 cars to the SONORAN desert drive and cave creek rd that is
already heavily congested with traffic. Thanks in advance for your consideration
JJ Marais
Mobile 602-315-6079
Page 260
From: Lindsey Tillman
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Preserve My Home - Maintain S-1 Zoning
Date: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 5:47:39 AM
Hi,
My name is Lindsey Tillman. I have lived in North Phoenix since I was 5. A lot has changed since
1992. I have wonderful memories growing up in Desert Hills. I remember running off and playing in
the desert washes, riding my horse on secluded desert trails, and going on desert walks with my
parents and little sister. I remember loving when it rained because our wash would flood and we
couldn’t go to school. I remember riding my horse to my elementary school. When deciding to raise
my own family, I wanted a similar childhood for my children, and this is why we choose to live in
North Phoenix.
We frequent the Apache Wash Trailhead and live off of Dove Valley road. We are always amazed at
the beauty that is still there despite watching the desert develop around us. I am writing this email
to ask you to NOT allow this desert to be overtaken with growth. Please preserve the quality that
makes North Phoenix a desirable and unique place to live. The vast desert views and tower saguaros
are not something someone can get in Chandler or Gilbert and why people love this area.
Please MAINTAIN S-1 ZONING. I do not want to see 1400 homes built on the Sonoran Desert
Preserve.
Thank you for preserving my home.
Lindsey Tillman
623-694-4088
lindseybtillman@gmail.com
Page 261
From: Diana Duran
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: MacEwen 480 Taylor Morrison"s rezoning request
Date: Thursday, March 28, 2019 12:02:44 PM
Hello,
I am writing to you as a homeowner that lives in the Sonoran Foothills HOA off of Sonoran
Desert Drive. I have read the 117 page Planned Unit Development Narrative and I have a
major concern about adding an additional 940 homes.
I am not opposed to the S1 Zoning which is the original zoning. What I am opposed to is
changing the Desert Overlay Zoning and S1 Zoning. Adding 1,420 homes will add an
additional 2,840 cars to Sonoran Desert Drive which happens to be a two lane scenic road.
That is a lot of cars on a scenic drive.
Sonoran Desert Drive ends at N Valley Parkway and Cave Creek Road. The additional 940
homeowners (and I'm sure they will be multiple car owners) will be driving to N Valley
Parkway or Cave Creek Rd for shopping and schooling. N Valley Parkway is already
crowded with the build-out of Sonoran Gate and then there will be additional homes on Dove
Valley Rd once Lennar Homes builds out. It is difficult to turn left or right onto Dove Valley
Rd these days.
If you look at page 115 of their proposal you can see they are surrounded by Apache Wash
and Cave Creek Wash as well as having Mesquite Tank Wash roll right through this proposed
subdivision. I can't see additional access roads being built. It seems the only access roads to
this subdivision is Sonoran Desert Drive. I ride my bicycle on this drive every weekend.
Please keep the original zoning and only allow 480 homes to be built and keep the Desert
Overlay designation.
Kind Regards,
Diana Duran, CMA, MBA
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
From: Jill Hoffman
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Re-zoning Taylor Morrison Sonoran Desert Drive
Date: Saturday, March 30, 2019 6:42:57 PM
Hello,
My name is Jill Hoffman and I am a resident of Sonoran Foothills. I would love to attend the planning
meeting on Tuesday evening, but my son has a playoff baseball game that night and my husband is
currently going through cancer treatment at Mayo, so he is unable to take him or attend the meeting. We are
trying to keep the kids lives as close to normal as possible, which means missing the re-zoning meeting.
I am very concerned about the plans Taylor Morrison has to change the current zoning for their project on
Sonoran Desert Drive. I support a change in zoning when it supports the surrounding community, but their
plans do not enhance our community in any way, it only adds 1400 new homes to an area not zoned or
designed to handle that. It goes against everything that is written on the Desert View Village Planning
Community website. The site talks about "higher densities along the Loop 101 freeway”, and about the
"natural washes that have biking, walking, equestrian and multi use trails that provide an abundance of
opportunities for recreation in the LOWER density areas". By approving Taylor Morrisons’ request to
change the density zoning, you are going against everything listed on the website and what the current
residents love about our village. To allow Taylor Morrison to also change the Desert Character Overylay,
also changes what the plan for the village is. Why should they be exempt from the plan? It’s one thing when
it’s in the higher density area, but this is adjacent to the Desert Preserve. Does that mean if they are
approved for the character overlay change, I can have grass and queen palms in my front yard? There was a
plan for a reason, so builders wouldn’t change the landscape of the beautiful desert we have here in north
Phoenix.
For the last 8 weeks, we have driven to Mayo on eastbound Sonoran Desert Drive 5 days a week. It is a
gorgeous road, but very crowded, and full of people with road rage in the morning. I drive 60 mph and have
been flipped off more times than I can count, (the speed limit is 45). It is so overcrowded, I can not imagine
how that road can handle more traffic the way the road was planned. The road would clearly need to be
widened, which would be against what it was meant to be, also at whose cost? The city? I sure hope not! I
don’t want the high density neighborhood, and now I’ll probably get to help pay for their access.
Another concern is that Sonoran Foothills School is already planning on building 4 new classrooms because
our school is past capacity in just it's 4th year. That neighborhood will also be assigned to a high school that
no one wants to go to, so they can open enroll elsewhere like we all do. I’m sure they would love to drive
their kids all the way to BGHS for all their activities so that we can help BGHS's test scores. That is one of
the biggest issues in holding us back from being a true community, we all split to 3 different high schools…
Boulder Creek, O’Connor and Pinnacle.
The 303 exit was not planned very well either, as that lane backs up to Dixileta by 4:30 every day. It’s un-
nerving to see the scared face in your rearview mirror when a driver doesn’t expect to stop on the freeway
going 70mph. If you continue to approve these zoning changes, it will take away our safety and from the
amazing village that was planned. Stick to the plan and keep our desert village great!
I sincerely hope you will consider my concerns. I love our north Phoenix neighborhood and hate to see it
destroyed by greedy builders. I have no issue with new homes, but it needs to fit within the current plan and
the builder needs to provide the infrastructure to support the growth.
Jill Hoffman
Page 270
From: azmitchlove
To: PDD Desert View VPC; jim@jimwaring.com; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Sonoran Desert Drive needs to remain as is
Date: Sunday, March 31, 2019 4:29:23 PM
Sonoran Desert Drive Zoning needs to remain as is. This is the most beautiful area in North
Phoenix and the Drive is such an amazing place to ride a bike or hike off of. Please please do
not give in to developers again.
470 homes is too much as is. 1,400 homes will ruin our community, natural resources and the
pristine desert we all enjoy.
Water is a major factor to consider. AZ is running out. I see all the wells Phoenix is digging
around town already. Another 1400 homes right here is a huge strain. We need to moderate
growth for a bit.
Traffic is another major issue. Taylor Morrison’s study is sided and misleading. Cave Creek
road has already seen an insane increase in traffic and accidents. Adding these homes will
make the roads a nightmare.
The signage is misleading and has been moved. How long have the signs been 100 yards or
more off of the road? I drove down Sonoran Desert Drive on Saturday to go hiking and saw
the signs are now closer to the road. How many people do not know about the meeting or the
rezoning request because they were not going to go offroading to read the signs...that is if they
even saw them from the road. Poor gamesmanship on the builder. They should not get away
with these misleading tactics.
Our community will be left with the consequences once Taylor Morrison and their competitors
move on. Please do not let them take advantage of the area and the city.
Thanks
Mitch Love
602-430-5152
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Page 271
From: Maureen Love
To: PDD Desert View VPC; jim@jimwaring.com; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Sonoran Desert Drive
Date: Sunday, March 31, 2019 4:11:04 PM
Sonoran Desert Drive Zoning needs to remain.
470 homes is too much, 1,400 homes will ruin our community and natural resources.
Water is a major factor to consider. AZ is running out.
Traffic is another major issue. Taylor Morrison’s study is sided and misleading.
The signage is misleading and has been moved.
Our community will be left with the consequences once Taylor Morrison and their competitors move on.
~Maureen Love.
Page 272
From: Allen Frankel
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Sonoran Preserve
Date: Monday, April 1, 2019 4:40:26 PM
I am opposed to the development at the Sonoran Preserve.
Sent from my iPhone
Page 273
From: Jeff Franklin
To: Council District 2 PCC; PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Save our Sonoran Preserve
Date: Monday, April 1, 2019 5:04:17 PM
Dear Councilman Jim Waring and Desertview VPC Committee:
My name is Jeff Franklin, I live in 85387 zip code. I support Save Our Sonoran Preserve and I
believe in the responsible and sustainable development of the desert in Arizona. This means
maintaining existing zoning of the preserve. Please vote no on the MacEwan 480 rezoning
request put forward by Taylor Morrison. This rezoning negatively impacts our preserve and
will set precedent for future home builders to put in higher density housing around the
preserve.
The case numbers are as follows: Z-62-18-2; Z-TA-5-18-2; and Z-75-18-2.
Thank you, and PLEASE vote NO!
Jeff Franklin
Page 274
From: Micki
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Rezoning cases Z-62-18-2, Z-TA-5-18-2, and Z-75-18-2
Date: Monday, April 1, 2019 2:29:46 PM
Dear Committee Members,
I am opposed to this request to rezone the area described as the MacEwan 480 in the above case
numbers. I own a home in Sonoran Foothills a development to the west of this proposed community.
Traffic is already a problem along Sonoran Desert Drive and adding 1420 homes can only make it
worse. Sonoran Desert Drive is designated as a scenic corridor, not a primary route into and out of a
project with this kind of density. The developers are also trying to remove the Desert Character
Overlay on this property which was originally developed to protect the character of the Sonoran
Desert with density restrictions and building codes. Please honor the original zoning of 1 home per
acre and retain the Desert Character Overlay by not approving this request.
Sincerely,
Michelle Kelley
480-330-1799
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
Page 275
From: Ms Pat De Stefano
To: council.district.2@phoenix.agov; jim@jimwaring.com; PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Rezoning on Sonoran Desert Drive
Date: Monday, April 1, 2019 1:08:47 PM
I am writing to strongly urge all NOT to rezone the open area on Sonoran Desert Dr. I am a
frequent hiker at Apache Wash, and rezoning and building houses in that area is totally
unnecessary, would ruin the landscape, increase traffic, and displace the animals and
reptiles that live in the open area. The houses that have already been built are a true
eyesore to the landscape. Please keep Arizona open and free!! NO MORE HOMES on
Sonoran Desert Dr.
Thank you.
Patricia Kite
Page 276
From: Cassandra M Leone
To: PDD Desert View VPC; jim@jimwaring.com; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Taylor Morrison Rezoning Save Our Sonoran Preserve
Date: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 2:05:33 PM
Dear Councilman Waring, Miss Wilson, and Village Committee,
My name is Cassandra Leone and I am a longtime Cave Creek resident, Northern Arizona
University graduate with a BS in Environmental Studies, hiker, biker, and state lover.
I would like to express my absolute disinterest in approving Taylor Morrison's rezoning
request for MacEwen 480.
This development touts itself as a premiere living space, when in reality, expanding the
already unnecessary development of Sonoran Desert Parkway will result in a slew of issues for
Cave Creek and Phoenix residents.
Increased traffic along the Parkway, which is already affected by work rush hours, will likely
increase the amount of accidents seen in this area. I'm afraid that these accidents will come at
the cost of bikers, runners, and recreation enthusiasts - people who are utilizing one of the only
open spaces left in North Phoenix/Cave Creek to enjoy their preferred sports.
In addition to my fear of this community changing the landscape and overall beauty of the
Sonoran Desert Preserve and Apache Wash Trailhead, I'm afraid that it will also affect local
wildlife, and further accelerate our increasing global temperature. Currently, the land along
Sonoran Desert Parkway cools the moment the sun drops, and continues to be an oasis within
the concrete of cookie cutter houses along Cave Creek Road.
I beg of you to reconsider allowing more homes to be built than already approved. As it is, the
MacEwen 480 development is detested among many desert dwellers, as our views and peace
are slowly scraped away by development. Please do not allow any further expansion in this
area.
Sincerely,
Cassandra Leone
480-323-9694
Cassandra Marie Leone
Page 277
From: Bob Thompson
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Planned development off of Sonoran Desert Drive
Date: Thursday, April 4, 2019 12:46:47 PM
Hi, I would like to voice my opposition to any rezoning for the planned development of the
area near the Apache Wash Trailhead. The area today is a beautiful expanse of desert and I
feel it would be wrong to allow high density development along the Sonoran Drive corredor. I
encourage you to keep the zoning as it is today.
Thanks,
Bob
Robert E. Thompson
(M) 314-568-1314
mrrobertthompson@hotmail.com
Page 278
From: LISA GALLAGHER
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Mayor Gallego; Council District 2 PCC; Council District 1 PCC; Council District 3 PCC;
Council District 4; Council District 5 PCC; Council District 6 PCC; Council District 7 PCC; district.8@phoenix.gov
Subject: OPPOSE the MacEwan 480 PUD REZONING
Date: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 4:32:09 PM
Please don't ruin my neighborhood!! I strongly OPPOSE the MacEwan 480 PUD
REZONING!! I drive Sonoran Desert Parkway on a regular basis and it is so
beautiful!! To allow developers to over develop the land adjacent to it would
be a disgrace to our desert and a complete disservice to the residents and
taxpayers of the nearby communities, out city and our state in general.
Approving this rezoning would open the door for other developers to do the
same and before we know it the beautiful desert and the scenic drive will be
gone!
OPPOSE the MacEwan 480 PUD REZONING!!
Sincerely,
Lisa Gallagher
2425 W Bronco Butte Trail #1034
Phoenix, AZ 85085
Page 279
From: jean brady
To: jim@jimwaring.com; PDD Desert View VPC; Mayor Gallego; Council District 1 PCC; Council District 3 PCC; Council
District 4; Council District 5 PCC; Council District 6 PCC; Council District 7 PCC; Council District 8 PCC
Subject: Sonoran Preserve
Date: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 6:40:27 PM
I am writing to formally oppose the proposed development by Taylor Morrison of a property along
the Sonoran Desert Drive.
The Sonoran Desert Preserve serves as a natural, archaeological, & recreational area, as well as
to provide protection against flooding.
There has been discussion of the need to expand Sonoran Desert Drive to 3 lanes each way for
access to Cave Creek Road. This traffic study should be done at the expense of the developer
who should then have to seriously contribute to this expense. Cave Creek Road is already unable
to handle the traffic turning onto Sonoran Desert Drive, imagine adding an additional 2500-3000
cars!
The impact of traffic, human waste, pets, garbage, and the general encroachment onto open land
would be immense; this development can only have an extremely negative impact.
Please, do not allow this re-zoning. This would open the door for every developer that follows.
Sincerely,
Jean Brady
Page 280
From: Council District 1 PCC
To: Kaelee Wilson
Cc: Racelle Escolar
Subject: FW: MacEwan 480 rezoning
Date: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 3:28:53 PM
Andrea Gaston
Council District 1 Office
602-262-7444
From: Daniel Centilli [mailto:daniel.centilli@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 1:10 PM
To: Council District 1 PCC
Subject: MacEwan 480 rezoning
Dear Councilwoman Thelda Williams,
My name is Daniel Centilli. I am a Phoenix homeowner in Desert Ridge.
I am actively organizing my community in opposition to Taylor Morrison’s proposal to rezone land
along Sonoran Desert Drive. We are paying attention, and we are not happy. Expect to be hearing
from us.
This letter is in regards to the MacEwan 480 PUD rezoning proposal, along Sonoran Desert Drive. I
am strongly opposed to the rezoning proposal, and I hope that you will take the time to investigate
this proposal closely. The north valley community is united in opposition to this development. The
developer has asked for for the removal of ‘Desert Character Overlay’ and the removal of ‘S-1’
zoning on a parcel of land that is immediately adjacent to the Sonoran Desert Preserve.
A change in zoning will result in the building of more than 1400 homes in the same 473 acre
property. This will set precedent for any future development. It does not honor the vision of the
Planners of the Sonoran Desert Preserve. It will turn Sonoran Desert Drive into a dangerous, traffic
congested thorofare. It will no longer be the scenic drive that it was intended to be. We expect to
see pedestrian and cyclist deaths. There has already been an increase in automobile accidents as
drivers lose patience with the increased traffic. The developer will not be bearing the cost of road
infrastructure. The city has no immediate plan to address the increased traffic. We we told by the
developer that the city plans to address it in the 8-10 year time frame. Not acceptable.
A change in zoning degrades the more than $300 million dollar investment that the City of Phoenix
undertook to purchase preserve land. This is not good stewardship of city assets! The value of the
preserve is largely in its rural character, which is protected by “Desert Character Overlay” and ‘S-1’
zoning. What’s next is the complete intrusion of more dense development, spurred by this change,
Page 281
and the precedent it will set.
Can we trust you to safeguard the investment our community has made?
A vote in favor of this change in zoning is a vote against the quality of life in my community. Our
current zoning makes an effort to protect our quality of life, the character of the Sonoran Desert
Preserve, and the will of our community to have shared public open space. We say, “Let them build
in accordance with current zoning. No changes, no exceptions.”
You as a city council member have an opportunity to do the right thing. Or not. We’re paying
attention.
A yes vote for rezoning would be a signal to us that this big corporation headquartered in Scottsdale,
not Phoenix, has an unequal say in what happens in our community. We are not ok with that. We’re
looking to our representatives to represent us first. Protect our community.
Please vote NO on the MacEwan 480 rezoning.
Thank you,
Daniel Centilli
*******
Page 282
From: Council District 1 PCC
To: Kaelee Wilson
Cc: Racelle Escolar
Subject: FW: MacEwen 480
Date: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:31:20 PM
Andrea Gaston
Council District 1 Office
602-262-7444
From: Christine Severance [mailto:tutudoc1@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:02 PM
To: Council District 1 PCC
Subject:
Good morning.
I am writing to clearly state my opposition to the proposed development by Taylor Morrison of a
property named MacEwen480.
Reasons I oppose this include:
a) The proposed rezoning changes to the Desert Overlay District will open the door to urban sprawl
into this and other "State Trust Lands" that were originally created to maintain The Sonoran Desert
Preserve as a natural, archaeological, & recreational area, as well as provide protection against
flooding in the Maricopa Flood Control District.
b) The Taylor Morrison developer has not presented an adequate traffic study that identifies the
road improvements described in their proposal. There has been discussion of the need to expand
Sonoran Desert Drive to 3 lanes each way for access to Cave Creek Road. This traffic study should be
done at the expense of the developer so that necessary negotiations between the City of Phoenix
and Taylor Morrison can take place. The developer should plan their portion of this expense and
present it at future public meetings of the community. Cave Creek Road is already unable to contain
the change in traffic patterns, an additional 1400+ homes would overburden the roads.
c) The developer has not yet articulated the details of their plans about mitigation of the impact
their project will have on the Maricopa Flood Control District. The City of Phoenix should require
public presentation of the plans to protect the City from future claims from owners of present and
future owners of homes in the Flood Control District.
As someone who has enjoyed the Sonoran Desert Preserve for hiking and biking regularly over the
last 5 years, I am appalled at the suggested change in zoning. The preserve is meant to protect our
Page 283
delicate desert ecosystem and the animals and native plants in the area. Combined with the impact
of traffic, human waste, pets, garbage, and the general encroachment onto open land, this
development can only have an extremely negative impact.
Please, do not allow this re-zoning. There are other areas that can be developed that will not have an
impact on the preserve, flood zone, and current residents.
Thank you for your time
Christine Severance
*******
Page 284
From: Turner Justin
Subject: I oppose the MacEwan 480 PUD rezoning!
Date: Tuesday, April 23, 2019 9:56:30 PM
Hello,
My name is Justin Turner. My wife & I and our 2 young children live in Tatum
Highlands (85331) and appreciate all that the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve offers not
only the residents of the Valley but also many visitors each year. Our family and the
residents of Phoenix oppose the MacEwan 480 rezoning. PLEASE VOTE NO!! This
would negatively impact the Sonoran Desert Preserve as well as the Maricopa Flood
Control System. In addition, I do not believe that the developer has done their due
diligence in conducting traffic and environmental impact studies for this proposed
change. In speaking of Arizona, President Teddy Roosevelt once said, "Arizona has
a natural wonder which is in kind absolutely unparalleled throughout the rest of the
world. I want to ask you to keep this great wonder of nature as it now is."
Save Our Sonoran Preserve speaks for me. Thank you for your support & PLEASE
VOTE NO.
Justin Turner C) 602-618-7883
Page 285
From: stephanie
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Sonoran preserve
Date: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 6:35:20 PM
Hello,
As a Phoenix resident for the past eleven years I am writing to respectfully request that you
NOT allow the MacEwan 480 PUD Rezoning. Please think of the long term effects for the
environment and the increased demands for water that the project would bring to our desert
state.
Thank you,
Stephanie Dinner
Page 286
From: hazardousheelers
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Opposition of the MacEwan 480
Date: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 9:14:01 PM
I realize the likelyhood of someone caring what I have to say it not in my favor but I
am devastated to hear about this proposed development near Apache trail wash. I
have had my horses in Desert hills for as long as I can remember and from day one I
dreamed of living out here. I put myself through school year after year to earn my
master's degree in special education. I worked my way through the ranks in the
school district until I got my dream job with a decent salary and I finally was able to
buy a house in desert hills right next to the Sonoran desert preserve. The peace and
quiet and small town feel is everything I could have ever dreamed of. Please don't
allow some faceless sycophant to steal what I have worked years for to achieve. Not
only do I worry for myself and my family's enjoyment but as a teacher I can see the
devastation additional students will do to our Deer Valley and Cave creek's already
overwhelmed school districts. You are considering allowing these greedy money
grubbing individuals to impact our future generation's level of education. After red for
ed I would think it would be obvious that pushing students into areas already
inundated with a huge population dooms the current student base to a mediocre and
inadequate education due to overpacked classrooms. Please remember the little
people when you review this decision. Please remember the students desperate for
attention and support and the teachers who are barely hanging on as it is. Please
remember the sacrifices and endless work I put in to be able to buy my dream home
in a quiet desert location. I am hoping common decency will outweigh profit in this
case.
Thank you,
Lindsey Zvara
Hazardousheelers@yahoo.com
Page 287
From: scott stearne
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Taylor Morrison 480 Development
Date: Friday, May 17, 2019 3:15:03 PM
Hello, my name is Scott Stearne. I live in Cave Creek..I wanted to reach out and speak about
my opposition to the 480 rezoning request by Taylor Morrison.
Honestly I don't understand how Phoenix can even consider this zoning request. Traffic in this
North Phx area is already a growing problem and concern. Additionally, water is also a huge
concern for our entire state. I used to live in Desert Hills, and area that I'm sure you know has
serious water problems. I am having a real problem with Phoenix continuing to literally punch
holes in the ground day after day and allowing new homes to be built, seemingly with no
concerns over the water table dropping. You may know that over the past decades that the
water table has dropped almost 200 feet in certain areas. And yet, new Wells are still put in.
Now, with a new development in the Sonoran Preserve, that will put additional strains on city
water use and delivery. We should all be looking far into the future to assess the States water
needs..We just had a drought that lasted 10 years. We don't know when the next one will
happen and how long it may last. People are already claiming the drought to be over, which is
leading to more usage and less conservation. That's a serious concern for all of us. And, 1400
homes are going to use an enormous amount of a prescious limited resource.
Trash is another concern. Another 1400 homes produce huge amounts of trash, how long can
we just dump in the land fills? They don't last forever as you know.
Then we have the issue of density. 4 homes per acre is unacceptable. The preserve is s delicate
beautiful place. Let's keep it that way. Please keep the zoning to low density as the original
plan calls for. I know we can't just stop the development as a whole, I'd like to. I love open
space and it's a valuable resource for all of us to enjoy. But that resource is gradually
disappearing.
I ask you to please vote to keep 480 a low density zone. Taylor Morrison will survive, our
beautiful desert may not in the long term. I have many other concerns that can't be expressed
in an email..I'm sure you can get the idea here though.
I thank you for allowing my opinion to be considered.
Most Respectfully,
Scott Stearne
Technical Support Specialists
36721 North 25th St
Cave Creek AZ
619-733-6700
Page 288
Page 289
Racelle Escolar
From: Andrea Galyean
Sent: Saturday, July 6, 2019 4:32 PM
To: Racelle Escolar
Subject: MacEwen 480 PUD application
Hello:
For your information and for the members of the Planning Commission, please see the attached letter for the
position of the Arizona Mountaineering Club regarding the proposed rezoning of the MacEwen 480. The
original letter was sent to the City Council on July 1. Complete text follows:
July 1, 2019
Phoenix Mayor and Phoenix City Council Members
200 West Washington Street, 11th Floor
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
RE: MacEwen 480 PUD Application, third submittal Jan. 10, 2019
Dear Mayor Gallego and Members of the City Council:
The Arizona Mountaineering Club, a 501(c)(7) not‐for‐profit organization based in Phoenix, Arizona, is a
recreational club focused on mountaineering and rock climbing. We provide outdoor education and
experiences and advocate to protect climbing resources.
As such, Arizona Mountaineering Club is opposed to the request by real estate development company Taylor
Morrison that the city waive established zoning requirements in order to allow a master planned community
of up to 1,420 houses on 472 acres bordering the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve. Our objection is grounded in the
belief that the Desert Character Overlay and Preserve Edge Guidelines were put in place to avoid precisely the
scenario being proposed, with higher density housing and related hardscape development abutting the
Preserve.
Access to outdoor recreation is a major asset and a key attraction for the City. The Overlay now in place
maintains the natural desert character of the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve, providing a respite from the built
environment for the good of residents, visitors, and native wildlife.
All of those needs are reflected in the current regulations, which preserve those limited assets for the greater
benefit of the City. Therefore, we ask that you maintain the Overlay and reject any proposal that does not
conform to that Overlay.
Sincerely,
Andrea Galyean
Page 290
Vice President, Arizona Mountaineering Club
4340 East Indian School Road, #21‐164
Phoenix, Arizona 85018
www.arizonamountaineeringclub.net
copies:
Members: City of Phoenix Planning Committee
Members: Desert View Village Planning Committee
Alan Stephenson, Director, City of Phoenix Planning Department
Kaylee Wilson, City of Phoenix Planner, Village of Desert View
Ingir Erickson, Director, City of Phoenix Parks Department
Sara Parks, Chair, City of Phoenix Parks Board
Gary Kirkilas, Save Our Sonoran Preserve founder
Page 291
From: Rich Mogull
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Preserve Desert Sonoran Drive
Date: Saturday, October 26, 2019 9:33:53 AM
I am writing to express my extreme concern over the rezoning application by Taylor Morrison
on Desert Sonoran Drive.
I am not anti-development, but all too often in Phoenix developers purchase land under the
assumption that they will not need to comply with current zoning laws. This has created an
incredible moral hazard in Phoenix that, as citizens, makes it effectively impossible for us to
make decisions on where to live with any expectations that laws and zoning will be respected
in the future.
This situation is especially egregious since we will lose an incredible community resource not
to benefit constituents, but merely one developer that clearly never planned to worry about the
low density zoning.
That area is entirely reasonable for development under the existing zoning. Increasing the
density and removing the look and feel requirements will permanently destroy the quality of
life of all constituents in the area and the city at large who use the preserve.
I implore you to keep the existing zoning and respect the residents of North Phoenix and
maintain our local resources instead of allowing Taylor Morrison to run roughshod over the
city.
Thank you,
Rich Mogull
3640 E Louise Dr
Phoenix, AZ
Page 292
From: Christopher Kowalsky
To: Toni Duenas
Cc: Julianna Pierre
Subject: RE: Plans for Master-Planned Community Verdin
Date: Friday, February 11, 2022 2:31:34 PM
Attachments: image001.png
Toni,
In reading this it appears that they are referring to the Verdin development that is going through a
current zoning entitlement case with PDD. I am CC’ing the village planner on this email who oversees
that process in this area.
Julianna, please find the attached email.
Thanks,
Chris
From: Streets P STR
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2022 2:16 PM
To: Christopher Kowalsky
Subject: FW: Plans for Master-Planned Community Verdin
Hi Chris,
Is this something you can assist with?
Thank you,
Toni Dueñas
Administrative Secretary to Kini L.E. Knudson
602-262-6136
From: D
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2022 12:29 PM
To: Receptionist PKS
Subject: Plans for Master-Planned Community Verdin
Hello,
I’m just writing this knowing not much can be done about the never ending development of our gorgeous Sonoran
Desert…
Page 293
But building on areas that used to be a preserve, building regardless of the natural, social and aesthetic value of
the land makes yet another development even more upsetting.
These ugly roof-to-roof homes are just concrete monstrosities created and “designed” without any respect and
correspondence with the surrounding nature - regardless of how much the developer will try to convince everyone
of a natural and "organic" feel and preservation of native habitats. 1420 homes cannot be organic - as it will
irreversibly damage the natural beauty of the desert and create even more traffic in areas that used to offer
incredible peace and views.
I truly don't understand how it's done - we see the impact already and it's so incredibly sad we don't give our land
more appreciation. One day, it'll all be gone - is there something that can be done about it today?
:(
Page 294
From: PDD Zoning Adjustment
To: Samantha Keating; Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Reject Zoning Application Z-62-18
Date: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 3:32:01 PM
Samantha/Juliana,
Is Z-62-18 moving forward? We received a comment email in the ZA mailbox. Please see
below.
Thank you,
Tricia Gomes, Zoning Administrator
Office: 602-262-4870 Email: tricia.gomes@phoenix.gov
► Planning & Development Department
Planning Division, Zoning Section
200 West Washington Street, 2nd Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Mission: Planning, Development and Preservation for a Better Phoenix
From: MITCH LISWITH
Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 2:58 PM
To: PDD Zoning Adjustment
Subject: Reject Zoning Application Z-62-18
As a Phoenix Park Steward, I am writing to ask you to reject Zoning Application Z-62-18. The
Sonoran Desert Preserve was created in 1998 to conserve open space from home
development. Groups worked hard to preserve the land surrounding Sonoran Desert Drive by
getting a zoning ordinance passed for a Desert Character Overlay, written to mandate low
density housing and maintain wildlife and desert view corridors along the Sonoran Preserve
Border.
This 480-acre parcel is known as Verdin (previously MacEwen 480). Listed in their narrative for
rezoning, "the property is uniquely situated as the only large, privately owned parcel
surrounded by the Sonoran Preserve and with access to Sonoran Desert Drive. Other parcels
surrounding MacEwen 480 are undeveloped and owned by the City, ASLD or FCD and
designated by the City as future Sonoran Preserve priorities". Rather than adhere to the
Desert Character Overlay zoning of 1 to 2 homes per acre on the land, Taylor Morrison (the
developer) wants 2 to 5 homes per acre on the entirety of the property. Over the past few
years, the developer has been trying to get the area rezoned from a low-density zone to a
high-density zone.
I am asking that the Desert Character Overlay designations be adhered to. I can't imagine the
damage to the desert that a huge subdivision right in the middle of open space would cause!
Page 295
Sincerely,
Mitchell Liswith
1638 W. Royal Palm Rd.
Phoenix, AZ 85021
Page 296
Page 297
From: Nancy Vetter
To: PDD North Gateway VPC; PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Proposed development by Taylor Morrison along Sonoran Desert Drive
Date: Wednesday, December 1, 2021 9:33:28 PM
Dear Desert View Village Members,
I am emailing you to express my concerns regarding a proposed development by Taylor Morrison along
Sonoran Desert Drive. I have many objections to this possible development and would welcome the
opportunity to discuss with you but for now would like to address the traffic issues this development will
create..
I live in Sonoran Foothills in a community called Desert Enclave. We have one entrance into this
community and it is from Dove Valley Road. At that point the road goes from a four lane road to a two
lane road with traffic heading east and west.
During each work day, Monday through Friday during peak times long lines of cars passing our entrance
have been observed making entering and exiting our community difficult and dangerous. Adding
additional homes off of this road will only add to the problem.
The extension of the 303 from I 17 to Cave Creek Road could offer some relief but my understanding is
that funds have not been allocated for this extension now or in the near future.
I would welcome your support in opposing this development.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Nancy Vetter
32618 N 16th Glen
Phoenix, Az 85085
602-881-3273
Page 298
From: Gordon Hutchinson
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: Taylor Morrison Verdin Development
Date: Thursday, December 2, 2021 11:50:19 AM
Julianna,
I am writing to you about the proposal to rezone 480 acres (Z-62-18-2) for development south
of Sonoran Desert Drive between 16th and 24th street alignments.
As a resident of Sonoran Gate, my concern is traffic volume along Dove Valley Rd and Sonoran
Desert Drive. Traffic volumes appear to be increasing on these roads in both directions as an
east west throughfare between Cave Creek Road and I17.
Are traffic studies completed or planned to measure traffic volumes on these roads? Are
there studies that project increases in traffic volume from the addition of approximately 1,400
new homes from this development?
Is this development contingent upon funding road improvements to accommodate increased
traffic volumes? Is limiting commercial vehicle traffic to local access being considered?
Thank you,
Gordon Hutchinson
Page 299
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: VOTE NO on MacEwen 480
Date: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 10:15:49 AM
From: Lora Terrill
Date: Monday, December 6, 2021 at 5:55 PM
To: jim@jimwaring.com
Cc: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: VOTE NO on MacEwen 480
Please VOTE NO on MacEwen 480/Taylor Morrison’s request for Re-Zoning (Z-62-18-2). We love our
Sonoran Preserve and want the City of Phoenix to MAINTAIN the Zoning as S1.
Thank you,
Lora Terrill
2517 E. Ridge Creek Road
Phoenix AZ 85024
*******
Page 300
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: VOTE NO on MacEwen 480
Date: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 4:18:01 PM
Please add to the public record, thank you.
From: coco whitaker
Date: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 at 4:17 PM
To: jim@jimwaring.com
Cc: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: VOTE NO on MacEwen 480
Please VOTE NO on MacEwen 480/Taylor Morrison’s request for Re-Zoning (Z-62-18-2). We love our
Sonoran Preserve and want the City of Phoenix to MAINTAIN the Zoning as S1.
Thank you,
Coco Whitaker
3976 E Scout Pass, Phoenix, AZ 85050
*******
Page 301
From: Christine M Pedersen
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Vote NO on MacEwen 480
Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 3:33:29 PM
Please add to the public record, thank you.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Monica Flint
Date: December 8, 2021 at 9:00:04 AM MST
To: jim@jimwaring.com
Subject: Vote NO on MacEwen 480
Please VOTE NO on MacEwen 480/Taylor Morrison’s request for Re-
Zoning (Z-62-18-2). We love our Sonoran Preserve and want the City of
Phoenix to MAINTAIN the Zoning as S1.
Thank you,
Monica Flint
23624 N 57th Drive
Glendale AZ 85310
Page 302
From: TIna Nuccio
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: I support the Taylor Morrison Verdin development on Sonoran Desert Drive
Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 12:00:58 PM
I am in favor the reasoning request from Taylor Morrison, for their proposed development on Sonoran Desert
Drive. Clearly we need more housing, and the average 3 homes/acre seems reasonable and in line with the
developments around it.
Thanks!
Page 303
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Proposed development off of Sonoran Desert Drive.
Date: Friday, December 10, 2021 7:54:24 AM
Please add to the public record.
From: Bob Thompson
Date: Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 7:59 PM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Cc: Terri Hotmail
Subject: Proposed development off of Sonoran Desert Drive.
Hi, I just attended the Desert View and North Gateway Planning Committee meetings, during which
there was a presentation about a proposed development off of Sonoran Desert Drive a little bit west
of cave creek road. It used to be called the McEwing 480, but I think it’s now called Verdin.
During the presentation many mentions of Sonoran Desert Dr as a major transportation corridor
were made.
I wanted to reach out to you to express my opposition to the development as well as any other
developments in this area. The Apache Wash area and the Sonoran Desert Preserve is a great natural
resource and wonderful recreational area.
I implore you to help preserve this area as it is without further development. With the already heavy
traffic on Sonoran Desert Drive, no additional traffic or development is welcome. I hope we could
get the designation changed for Sonoran Desert Drive so that it is no longer considered a major
transportation corridor. I’d also like the rest of the area to be changed from state trust land to
preserve.
Please let me know your thoughts on this matter
Thanks,
Bob Thompson
Mrrobertthompson@hotmail.com
*******
Page 304
From: Sonoran Preserve
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: Message to VPC Members
Date: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 10:17:25 AM
Hi Julianna,
I wanted to forward a message along with some documents to the members of both the
Desert View and North Gateway VPC regarding the MacEwan/Verdin PUD request. I
copied the message below and attached the documents.
Thank you!
-Gary
Dear Members of the Desert View and North Gateway VPC,
First, thank you for your service of representing our community on the VPC. Your time and
dedication is greatly appreciated and respected!Second, since Taylor Morrison’s presentation last
month, I have been researching the multitude of concerning factors with their PUD request including
increased traffic without an existing transportation infrastructure, building next to a floodplain, and
building 1,400 homes in the middle of the desert also without an existing plan for schools and other
necessary infrastructure. Particularly, their request to remove the Desert Character
Overlay Ordinance, a written law to protect the integrity of the Sonoran Preserve, is that of upmost
concern.
The ordinance is clear. It very specifically states its purpose is to “provide a transition from the
preserve to areas with greater density” and should extend down to the “Dynamite Blvd alignment on
the south” in order to “maintain the fragile undisturbed areas and wildlife corridor along the Cave
Creek Wash.” These boundaries are carefully delineated based on ecosystems to ensure maximum
preservation among development.
It absolutely does not state anywhere that its intent is to only extend to where the Sonoran Desert
Drive may happen to be located, as Taylor Morrison’s lawyer contends as their basis for
circumventing the ordinance. This well-written ordinance is explicit and Taylor Morrison’s request
for us to remove the ordinance is not valid.
There is a committed force of citizens that care deeply about this, encompassing over 1,000
members of the Save Our Sonoran Preserve group and hundreds of folks from across the city that I
have spoken with in the preserve. Importantly, it also includes valued organizations and businesses
such as the City of Phoenix Desert Parks Department, hot air balloon companies, and hiking and rock
climbing groups.
I have attached their letters urging you to maintain the Desert Character Overlay, not only because
it’s a law, but because it’s meant to protect the Sonoran Desert Preserve - one
of our community’s greatest assets and attractions!
Page 305
Thank you again for your time. Please reach out to me with any questions or comments.
-Dr.Gary Kirkilas
Save Our Sonoran Preserve
Saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com
PSPMMPC L to PRB March 28 2019… [drive.google.com]
Hot Air Expeditions Sonoran Preserve… [drive.google.com]
AMC letter Phoenix Preserve.pdf [drive.google.com]
Sonoran Preserve Opposition Letter.pdf [drive.google.com]
MacEwen.pdf [drive.google.com]
CB_ltr_2019_cmt.docx [docs.google.com]
Rezoning Request_MacEwan 480… [drive.google.com]
Page 306
From: Samantha Keating
To: David Urbinato
Cc: Julianna Pierre
Subject: RE: D5 Constituent public commentFW: emdist5 - Form Submission
Date: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 4:20:16 PM
Attachments: image011.png
image012.png
image013.png
image014.png
image015.png
image016.png
image017.png
image018.png
Hi David,
This is in reference to Z-62-18. It is a PUD and no dates have been set for hearing. The
latest draft of the proposal is on the PUD page.
Julianna – let’s add this to the case file.
Thank you,
Samantha Keating
Principal Planner
Long Range Planning
Office: 602-262-6823
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
From: David Urbinato
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 4:14 PM
To: Samantha Keating
Subject: FW: D5 Constituent public commentFW: emdist5 - Form Submission
Samantha, I just saw this one pop up in the Republic. But I can’t pin it down on the rezoning staff
report webpage.
David Urbinato
Management Assistant II
Phoenix Planning and Development Department
602-534-3630
From: Michael R Angulo
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 4:04 PM
To: David Urbinato
Subject: FW: D5 Constituent public commentFW: emdist5 - Form Submission
David,
Do you know what project this constituent is referring to? Thanks!
Page 307
Michael Angulo
Research & Policy Director
desk: 602-262-4822 cell: 602-478-6347
web: Phoenix.gov email: michael.angulo@phoenix.gov
200 W. Washington Street, 11th Floor
Phoenix AZ 85003
How can our office better communicate?
Click HERE to respond to our short survey
From: Council District 5 PCC
Date: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 at 2:40 PM
To: Michael R Angulo
Subject: D5 Constituent public commentFW: emdist5 - Form Submission
D5 Constituent public comment regarding a development project. How shall we respond?
Emmanuel Gallardo-Sanidad
Constituent Services Director
Main line: (602) 262-7446 Direct line: (602) 534-9721
Web: Phoenix.gov/district5
200 W. Washington Street, 11th Floor. Phoenix, AZ 85003
Page 308
From: no-reply@phoenix.gov
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 1:14 PM
To: Council District 5 PCC
Subject: emdist5 - Form Submission
FROM : Kyle Mickel
SUBJECT : Sonoran Preserve Development
MESSAGE : Councilmember Guardado,
Greetings. I am a supporter and a constituent. I am writing today after reading in the Az
Republic about the proposed development of 1400 homes near our beloved and precious
Sonoran Preserve. I wish to voice my extreme disappointment in this proposal and urge you to
oppose this large scale project which would severely impact the beauty, native vegetation,
desert wildlife and quality of life for residents who love to enjoy this truly beautiful and
remarkable area. We are very fortunate to have this grand mountain preserve in our back
yards. If you have not visited Apache Wash or any of the other magnificent hiking/biking
areas within the Sonoran Preserve lately, please re-visit this area to truly appreciate what we
have. Let's keep the Preserve and its desert inhabitants alive. Please voice your opposition to
this project when it comes before Council this Spring. Thank you.
Kyle Mickel
PS: Considering our severe water shortage, this project should not move forward on that basis
alone. But there exist so many other reasons to say no to this horrible concept.
Email : kylemickel4@gmail.com
AREA : 602
ADDRESS : 1808 W. Orangewood Ave
CITY : Phoenix
STATE : Az
ZIP : 85021
Submission ID: 0d168e3d18554c39a6752e0d7f81c44f
Form Submission On : 1/19/2022 1:14:04 PM
Referer: https://phoenix.gov/district5/email
This is Not Spam - This message is sent on behalf of the City of Phoenix.
Please handle appropriately.
Page 309
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: emdist2 - Form Submission
Date: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 9:25:28 AM
Hi Julianna,
Please add to the public record.
Thank you.
From: no-reply@phoenix.gov
Date: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 at 8:22 AM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: emdist2 - Form Submission
FROM : Tina nuccio
SUBJECT : I support Verdin housing development near Sonoran Preserve
MESSAGE : Hi Jim. I want to voice my support for the proposed density of the Verdin
development. This area desperately needs more affordable housing and the area can easily
support the proposed density, given all of open space around it.
I am also a frequent biker/hiker (Apache Wash) in the area, so I do appreciate the amenities,
but know it was always intended to be developed partially.
If/when this is approved, if it is affordable enough, we will consider purchasing a home there.
Email : crn57370@gmail.com
AREA : 602
PHONE : 549-8869
ADDRESS : 4450 e. Sierra sunset trail
CITY : Cave creek
STATE : Az
ZIP : 85331
Submission ID: 997d7a3ae3974fdc8684982db5123b90
Form Submission On : 1/19/2022 8:22:38 AM
Referer: https://phoenix.gov/district2/contact-district-2
This is Not Spam - This message is sent on behalf of the City of Phoenix.
Page 310
Please handle appropriately.
Page 311
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: emdist2 - Form Submission
Date: Thursday, January 20, 2022 2:46:48 PM
Please add to the public record, thank you.
From: no-reply@phoenix.gov
Date: Thursday, January 20, 2022 at 2:28 PM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: emdist2 - Form Submission
FROM : Kyle Mickel
SUBJECT : Sonoran Preserve Proposal
MESSAGE : Councilmember Waring,
Greetings. I am a 32-year Phoenix resident writing with concerns today after reading in the Az
Republic about the proposed development of 1400 homes near our beloved and precious
Sonoran Preserve. I wish to voice my extreme disappointment in this proposal and urge you to
oppose this large scale project which would severely impact the beauty, native vegetation,
desert wildlife and quality of life for residents who love to enjoy this truly beautiful and
remarkable area. We are very fortunate to have this grand mountain preserve in our back
yards. If you have not visited Apache Wash or any of the other magnificent hiking/biking
areas within the Sonoran Preserve lately, please re-visit this area to truly appreciate what we
have. Let's keep the amazing Preserve and its desert inhabitants alive. Please voice your
opposition to this project when it comes before Council this Spring. Thank you.
Kyle Mickel
PS: Considering our severe water shortage, this project should not move forward on that basis
alone. But there exist so many other reasons to say no to this horrible concept. I appreciate
your consideration.
Email : kylemickel4@gmail.com
AREA : 602
PHONE : 299-6147
ADDRESS : 1808 W. Orangewood Ave.
CITY : Phoenix
STATE : AZ
ZIP : 85021
Submission ID: ca17955446204320b564f8605e31035f
Form Submission On : 1/20/2022 2:28:17 PM
Referer: https://phoenix.gov/district2/contact-district-2
Page 312
This is Not Spam - This message is sent on behalf of the City of Phoenix.
Please handle appropriately.
Page 313
Page 314
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Verdin project support
Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2022 7:41:49 AM
Please add to the public record
From: Jennifer Ruby
Date: Monday, March 7, 2022 at 8:32 PM
To: Jim Waring
Subject: Verdin project support
Hello Councilman Waring -
We’ve met a few times; I’ve been a constituent of yours going back to your days in the State Senate.
I wanted to take a few minutes to express my support for the proposed Verdin project. Northeast
Phoenix has been a wonderful place for my family to live for decades, and I welcome Verdin’s
additional single-family housing options. With all the exciting new employment coming to North
Phoenix, we need more housing so that employees can build their lives here and continue to grow
our vibrant community. The overall low density is entirely appropriate for this area, and the
thoughtful design exhibited by the Edge Openness Plan will be an enhancement not only for Verdin
residents but also for the greater area. I’m particularly excited about the improvements to Sonoran
Desert Drive which are badly needed and unlikely to happen without new development.
Finally, North Phoenix will be incredibly lucky to lay claim to a master plan certified by the National
Wildlife Federation. Talk about leading by example!
Please also share my support with the Village Planning Committees. Thank you for your time,
Jen
Jennifer Ruby
2333 E Chama Drive
Phoenix 85024
*******
Page 315
From: Jennifer Ruby
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: Fwd: Verdin project support
Date: Monday, March 7, 2022 8:54:48 PM
Hi Ms. Pierre -
I wanted to share with you my email of support for the Verdin project. I find the project’s
application materials to be very thoughtful and comprehensive. It’s rare lately to see a project
proposing only single-family detached housing...compare for example the recent projects
adjacent to where I live: Sendero Foothills and Stone Butte East, both of which include higher
density/intensity and attached product.
I believe this project will be great for North Phoenix. Thank you for your hard work getting it
to this point.
Jen Ruby
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jennifer Ruby
Subject: Verdin project support
Date: March 7, 2022 at 8:32:35 PM MST
To: jim.waring@phoenix.gov, council.district.2@phoenix.gov
Hello Councilman Waring -
We’ve met a few times; I’ve been a constituent of yours going back to your days
in the State Senate. I wanted to take a few minutes to express my support for the
proposed Verdin project. Northeast Phoenix has been a wonderful place for my
family to live for decades, and I welcome Verdin’s additional single-family
housing options. With all the exciting new employment coming to North Phoenix,
we need more housing so that employees can build their lives here and continue to
grow our vibrant community. The overall low density is entirely appropriate for
this area, and the thoughtful design exhibited by the Edge Openness Plan will be
an enhancement not only for Verdin residents but also for the greater area. I’m
particularly excited about the improvements to Sonoran Desert Drive which are
badly needed and unlikely to happen without new development.
Finally, North Phoenix will be incredibly lucky to lay claim to a master plan
certified by the National Wildlife Federation. Talk about leading by example!
Please also share my support with the Village Planning Committees. Thank you
for your time,
Jen
Jennifer Ruby
Page 316
2333 E Chama Drive
Phoenix 85024
Page 317
From: Ann Griffith
To: Jim Waring; Julianna Pierre
Cc: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Taylor Morrison Verdin Master Planned Community
Date: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 10:44:41 AM
Mr. Waring & Ms. Pierre,
After reading the recent Valley Vibe News article about the pushback on this proposed
development from the Save Our Sonoran Preserve group, I wanted to voice a counter opinion
for consideration.
I absolutely support the need to preserve the beauty and natural wildlife of our Arizona
deserts…it’s what makes Arizona such a beautiful place to live. However, I also understand the
economic importance of development to foster business development, attract the best
employers and sustain a generational workforce.
Our son, a recent CU graduate, relocated back to Phoenix after accepting an offer for his first
professional career position. His home search was challenging. After realizing he could afford
a mortgage that was comparable to the average rent, he set his sights on new home
ownership. It was extremely difficult to find new communities that were more central to his
work and that fit the lifestyle he was looking to experience.
The Sonoran Desert/I-17 corridor was a target area for him due to location and proximity to
shopping, entertainment and outdoor activities. However, what he found were thousands of
new/planned apartments. If this community were further along and offered affordable options
for first-time buyers, it would have been a strong consideration.
The vision for Verdin is beautiful. It strikes a critical balance between community and nature.
Developers and home builders need to do more for preservation and sustainability. Taylor
Morrison is setting a gold standard here. As you consider future development in this area, I do
ask that you challenge your developers and home builders to exceed the standard that is being
set here. I’d also ask that communities offer more affordable options for first time home
buyers (e.g. townhomes).
Sincerely,
Ann Griffith
Page 318
Attachment C
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-62-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting December 7, 2021
Request From S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence), S-1 DCOD (Ranch or
Farm Residence, Desert Character Overlay District), and
RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District)
Request To PUD DCOD, Pending PUD (Planned Unit Development,
Desert Character Overlay District, Pending Planned Unit
Development) and PUD (Planned Unit Development)
Proposed Use Single-family Residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC DISCUSSION:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #3 – Information Only – GPA-DSTV-1-18-2,
Item #5 – Information Only – Z-TA-5-18-2, and Item #6 – Information Only – Z-75-18-2.
Committee member Reginal Younger arrived to the meeting and Committee member
Jason Israel left the meeting during this item, bringing the quorum to 11 members.
10 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve, will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes per
acre, and will have 7 miles of trails and community paths. She discussed the
application requests to rezone to PUD, amend the General Plan, and amend the Desert
Character Overlay District. She also discussed the extension and build out of Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt also discussed the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife
Federation (NWF). She discussed the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. She noted the NWF landscape palette, pedestrian
circulation, and open edge plan.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 319
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave asked about the cost of the extension of Sonoran Desert
Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that Verdin’s contribution will only be for a portion of the
extension. She stated that as other developers build along Sonoran Desert Drive they
will have their own contribution requirements.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that the North Land Use Plan should be considered in
addition to the General Plan. He stated that the developer should consider building less
than 1000 units. He added that the development will generate traffic and overload
schools. Susan Demmitt stated that the development will have a maximum of 3 units
per acre, which is consistent with developments adjacent to the preserve. She stated
that they are in discussion with the Deer Valley School District and the development is
within the boundary for Desert Mountain schools, which have capacity. She stated that
Cave Creek schools also have capacity.
Committee member Rick Nowell asked about traffic lights on Sonoran Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt stated that a traffic study is being completed and that there will most
likely be a traffic signal at the main entrance of the development in the future.
Committee member Rick Nowell stated that he had concerns that the project has
returned after a couple years, but not decreased the density.
Committee member Rick Powell asked about the cost of the extension of Sonoran
Desert Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that the cost estimate for the full extension of
Sonoran Desert Drive is approximately $120 million. She stated that the build out will
take place when the traffic demand exists and the funding is available. Committee
member Rick Powell stated that the development is not in line with the character of the
area.
Committee member Reginald Younger asked how close homes will be to Sonoran
Desert Drive. Susan Demmitt stated the development’s property line is adjacent to
Sonoran Desert Drive, but the site will have landscape buffers. Committee member
Reginald Younger stated that he is hoping for less density on site.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that the Desert View Character Plan should also be
take into account and to meet the character of the area, density should be decreased or
the development proposal be moved closer to the core. He added that Desert Mountain
and Cave Creek schools are too far from the development.
Committee member Jill Hankins asked if a flood analysis had been completed for the
site. Susan Demmitt stated that the site is not proposing development in the
established flood corridor or flood zone. Nguyen Lam, representative with Hilgart
Wilson, stated that the drainage corridors have mapped floodplains and are subject to
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). He added that the developer will
work with the City to appropriately address the flood zones. Committee member Jill
Hankins stated that she had concerns with additional hardscape in the area.
Committee member Michelle Santoro stated that she appreciates the design, open
space, and connectivity proposed by the development.
Daniel Centilli, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve and various trail running
groups, stated that developers see the area as a transportation corridor, but residents
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 320
see it as a recreation corridor. He added that the development will reduce quality of life.
He stated that other residential projects in the area have increased trash and traffic.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, stated that he appreciated the
partnership with the NWF and proposed trails and access. He added that the Desert
Character Overlay is tied to the preserve and should be retained.
Sue Pierce, a resident of Desert Enclave, stated that the area is exploding with
development, especially with the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company
(TSMC), but residential development will lead to increased traffic. She stated that traffic
issues are already complicated in the area and there is no plan from the development
about how to alleviate the issue. She added that major transportation will lead to
additional noise pollution. She stated that there is an opportunity to preserve the area
as a tranquil space in the Sonoran Preserve.
Susanne Rothwell, a member of the Phoenix Mountain Preservation Council,
expressed concerns regarding amending the Desert Character Overlay. She added
that the developer should keep 50% of the land as native and homes should be low
scale. She also expressed concerns with the lack of parking if a trailhead is provided on
site.
James Gaston, a resident of Tuscana at Tatum Ranch, questioned how the
development will deal with increases in water and sewer usage.
Bob Thompson, a member of the public, stated that he was opposed to the
development and instead wanted to preserve the area as natural preserve. He also
expressed concerns with traffic and density.
Scott Coll, a member of the public, expressed concerns with traffic. He added that
there is a need to preserve the preserve area.
Crystal Lehman, a member of the public, stated that Sonoran Desert Drive is a
pleasant driving experience as is and expanding the roadway and increasing homes
takes away from the beauty of the desert.
Rebecca Rodriguez, a local hiker, trail runner, and mountain biker, stated that she
enjoys the beautiful views and wildlife in the area. She expressed concerns with
increased noise from the roadway.
Paul Grayczyk, president of the Sonoran Gate Home Owner’s Association, stated the
he understands the area will develop eventually, but expressed concerns with density
and traffic. He added that the development should be set back further from Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt stated that she had no additional comments or responses at this time,
but will continue dialogue with the community going forward.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that Sonoran Desert Drive will increase to 6 lanes,
but that does not mean that the preserve area cannot be preserved. Committee
member Jill Hankins also expressed the need to retain open spaces in the City.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 321
Committee member Rick Powell stated that he believes development should be
slower and the area kept more natural.
Committee member Reginald Younger stated that he likes the look of Sonoran Desert
Drive as is and hopes that development will allow that to be retained. He also
expressed concerns with increased density.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 322
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-62-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting April 2, 2019
Request From S-1 DCOD (155.14 acres), S-1 (343.04 acres) and RE-
35 DCOD (10.24 acres)
Request To PUD DCOD (pending PUD) (165.99 acres) and PUD
(343.04 acres)
Proposed Use Single-family Residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC DISCUSSION:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, gave a presentation of the case up to this point in time. She
stated that they started this process back in August. Ms. Demmitt went through the
General Plan history of the area, along with the Desert Character Overlay District
establishment. She summarized the infrastructure improvements that would be required
for the subdivision to be built. Ms. Demmitt went on to describe the comments the
developer is receiving from members of the public. The first comment was that the
property should stay S-1. Ms. Demmitt stated that staying S-1 would be one home per
acre. Having a subdivision with multiple sized lots/homes would be more affordable for
residents to live in proximity to the preserve.
The next comment from the public that was addressed is the condition of Sonoran
Desert Drive. Ms. Demmitt stated they are working with the City and the State Land
Department to evaluate. She went on to present pages form the 2002 council report that
indicated that at full capacity, Sonoran Desert Drive will be able to handle 50,000 cars a
day. The road was intended to be a major thoroughfare.
The next concern Ms. Demmitt addressed was the acquisition of Sonoran Preserve
Land. She went on to state that the MacEwen property has been privately held since the
1950’s. Taylor Morrison is agreeable to put a public trail through the center of the
property, adjacent to the wash corridor, to connect the preserve north and south of
Sonoran Desert Drive. She stated they will comply with the Sonoran Edge Treatment
Guidelines. Ms. Demmitt stated the City’s Park and Recreation Department is currently
looking at acquiring the land to the east of the MacEwen parcel for preserve.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 323
Lou Lagrave stated that he understands that Sonoran Desert Drive is intended to be a
six-lane arterial and the General Plan on the southern two-thirds of the property has the
land use designation that supports the proposed density but that he still has concerns.
Mr. Lagrave stated that he is concerned about the traffic on Sonoran Desert Drive, how
the kids will get to school and the proposed lot sizes.
Susan Demmitt addressed Mr. Lagrave and stated that they are looking into what they
can do to alleviate some of the concerns regarding Sonoran Desert Drive but the
construction of the southern leg is 47 million dollars. She stated that the kids that live in
this development will have the option of attending either Deer Valley Schools or Cave
Creek Schools. She stated that both school districts will be providing bus service into
the neighborhood.
Jill Hankins asked if the Mesquite Wash is a 404 wash. Susan Demmitt referred to
Nguyen Lam on her development team. Mr. Lam stated they are disturbing less than an
acre and it is not within the 404-protected area. Ms. Hankins asked if there have been
any studies done regarding cultural items or protected species. Mr. Lam stated the
studies have been done and nothing was found.
Doug Dickson stated that the committee has received many emails opposition and not
one in support. Doug Dickson stated that they should talk to State Land about swapping
this parcel for a better suited piece of land. He asked if the applicant had explored this
option. Ms. Demmitt stated that the City hasn’t identified this piece of land as preserve
land, but they have not discussed a swap with State Land.
Steve Bowser stated that the committee has letters in front of them in opposition from
the Sierra Club and PMPC.
Steve Bowser read the cards in opposition that didn’t wish to speak.
The floor was opened for public comment.
Debra Sedillo Dugan, resident, stated she has concerns about the traffic and views. She
said the signs were posted where no one could see them until the applicant recently
moved them.
John Furniss, resident, stated he is the Chair of the Phoenix Mountain Preserve
Committee for the Parks and Recreation Department. He said there should be a letter
from their committee to deny this project. He stated that they aren’t opposed to growth,
but this will set precedence and that we need to protect what he have.
Stacie Beute, resident, stated she is opposed to the request. She has been a longtime
friend to the Phoenix Mountain Preserve and advises on committees. She said that
Taylor Morrison will be selling the homes with the added amenity of the proximity to the
preserve, but they are developing on the preserve. She stated she is concerned about
the impacts on the environment.
Amanda Farr, resident, stated that Sonoran Desert Drive is currently a safe place to
cycle and run. If this development is approved, it will no longer be safe.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 324
Gary Kirkilas, resident, stated that he is a Park Steward for the Phoenix Mountain
Preserve. He stated that he started the Save Our Sonoran Preserve group as an
advocacy group in response to the request. He stated that the proposal isn’t consistent
with the North Land Use Plan and the Desert View Character Plan. Mr. Kirkilas urged
the committee that if it doesn’t make sense, say no to the proposal.
Daniel Centilli, resident, stated that he is a Desert Ridge homeowner. He said the
current DCOD overlay prevents something like this proposal from happening. He stated
that the applicant is asking for exceptions to the law. He went on to state the preserve is
our legacy.
Patrick Havley, resident, thanked the committee. He stated he is concerned for the
safety of cyclists on Sonoran Desert Drive. He also stated this project won’t contribute
to the overall good of the City.
Gannon Burleigh, resident, said that he is opposed and has concerns about traffic,
schools and the impact on the preserve. He said that the project is irresponsible
development and that the removal of the overlay district that protects the preserve is
ridiculous.
Laura Jones, resident, stated she has concerns about the traffic on Sonoran Desert
Drive. She stated the development should be one acre lots to preserve the wildlife.
Patrick McMullen, resident, states that he is the President of the PMPC. He stated that
the Phoenix Mountain Preserve Council has been around since the 1970’s to preserve
the desert. He stated that PMPC is opposed to the request.
Mandy Fellows, resident, passed out a study from an ASU professor concerning the
ecological impact and flooding concerns in the area. She stated that this area is
downstream from three dams, with the closest dam being 1.5 miles away.
John Trojan, resident, stated he is opposed to the request with concerns about traffic,
pedestrian safety and allowing the developer to craft their own zoning standards.
Lainy Porter, resident, stated she moved to Arizona for pain management. She stated
that she trains for triathlons on Sonoran Desert Drive and is concerned about the
increase in traffic.
Claudia Wagner, resident, stated she is a trail runner and has concerns about the
danger the increased traffic with cause on Sonoran Desert Drive. She is also concerned
about the potential for flooding.
Heather Larson, resident, stated she is concerned about the increase in traffic and
pedestrian safety.
Tim Holt, resident, said that he moved to Phoenix from Seattle. He said this proposal is
just setting precedence and the next development will be even more dense. Mr. Holt
went on to state this project is about money and greed.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 325
Brett Scholar, resident, stated that he uses Sonoran Desert Drive to run and cycle. He
questioned the benefit the applicant will bring to the area. He stated that the property
should stay as it is currently zoned.
Lindsey Tillman, resident, stated she is opposed to the request. She said that the City
needs to protect the Sonoran Preserve.
Susan Beccian, resident, stated that she is one of the only people that have received
letters about this case but didn’t receive one concerning the meeting tonight. She said
she is concerned that Gammage and Burnham isn’t being upfront with the community.
Cassandra Leone, resident, thanked her neighbors for coming out to oppose the zoning
request. She said she is concerned about pedestrian safety and the traffic on Sonoran
Desert Drive. She said she has read the PUD and has concerns about the sustainability
section.
Michelle Kelley, resident, stated that she is opposed to the request. She commented
that just because a plan is 30 years old doesn’t mean it’s not a good plan. It means the
community and the planning department were visioning long term. This request doesn’t
comply with the Desert View Character Plan. Ms. Kelley went on to state that the school
is over capacity and there is no real plan from the applicant to resolve that issue. She
closed by stating the area should be preserved and the plans should not be changed.
Sue Pierce, resident, stated that she is opposed to the request. Ms. Pierce went on to
state that this project is going to be a financial burden on taxpayers. Even though the
applicant must pay to extend infrastructure, the taxpayers pay to maintain this
infrastructure that is being extended to only serve this subdivision.
Christine Severance, resident, stated that that the signs for the hearing were posted far
from the road so they couldn’t be read. She stated the applicant purchased the property
with the current zoning and that it shouldn’t be changed.
Karen Severance, resident, stated that the preserve means a lot to her. She urged the
committee to think about the ecosystem when they vote on this case at a later date.
Jennifer Severance, resident, stated that nature needs to have space. The edges of the
preserve are important.
Karl Mar, resident, stated that he is opposed to the request. He said that the
infrastructure can’t handle a development of this size.
Patty Killinger, resident, stated that she has been in the area since the 1970’s. She said
that the parcel’s adjacency to the Sonoran Preserve is important.
Anna Lewandowski, resident, stated she just found out about the project about two
weeks ago and came to the meeting to learn more about it. She said from listening to
the applicant’s presentation and the testimony of the public, it sounds like this
development is 10 years too soon. The current infrastructure and school systems can’t
handle the residents this development will generate.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 326
Mike Rooney, resident, stated this project is political. This development is not consistent
with the Desert View Character Plan.
Patricia Story, resident, stated that she is concerned for public safety in the areas. She
said the area already has an emergency response time issue.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 327
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-62-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting November 6, 2018
Request From S-1 DCOD (155.14 acres), S-1 (343.04 acres) and RE-
35 DCOD (10.24 acres)
Request To PUD DCOD (pending PUD) (165.99 acres) and PUD
(343.04 acres)
Proposed Use Single-family Residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC DISCUSSION:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, presented the information to the Village regarding MacEwen
480. She addressed the history of the site and the current requests to ultimately build
1,420 homes. She addressed that a portion of the 480 acres is within the Desert
Character Overlay District and the North Land Use Plan.
Lou Lagrave had questions regarding the alignment of Sonoran Desert Drive. He stated
it is a nice development in the wrong location and that there is no justification for the
density. He stated that according to the North Land Use Plan that this area is intended
to be 2 dwelling units per acre or less.
Rick Nowell clarified that the applicant would only be adding one lane in front of their
own development, not the entire length of Sonoran Desert Drive. He stated it is a nice
project in the wrong place. He stated that Sanctuary at Desert Ridge is unsightly and he
doesn’t want to see that in this location.
Rick Powell asked which school district in which the property is located. Ms. Demmitt
said Deer Valley.
Steve Bowser asked how long the land has been privately held. Ms. Demmitt stated
since the 1950’s.
Ryan Schaefer asked if the developer was contributing to the Sonoran Desert Drive
alignment. Ms. Demmitt said the subdivision will be contributing to impact fees.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 328
Jill Hankins expressed concern about the safety of the cyclists on Sonoran Desert
Drive. She stated there needs to be an underpass and islands for the bikers.
Steve Bowser opened the meeting to public comment.
Richard Puleri, resident, stated he has concerns about the current traffic congestion on
Sonoran Desert Drive and inquired on when Sonoran Desert Drive will be expanded
and connected.
Michael Kaciemba, resident, stated he lives in Sonoran Foothills and that he has
concerns about the current traffic congestion. He stated that this project shouldn’t be
improved until the streets are expanded. He also addressed the school doesn’t have
capacity.
Public comment closed.
Reginald Younger said that Taylor Morrison expanded the roads with Sky Crossing.
Rick Powell states he has concerns about the school capacity.
Deanna Chew asked if residents would have a City of Phoenix address. Ms. Demmitt
stated she believes they will.
Rick Nowell asked if a traffic study has been done. Ms. Demmitt says it was recently
completed but has not been submitted to the City yet.
There was a brief committee discussion concerning the possibility of age restriction
subdivisions within the development.
Louis Lagrave stated he believes in land rights but this needs to come back with R1-10
zoning. Louis Lagrave also requested staff send out the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 329
Attachment D
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-62-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting December 9, 2021
Request From S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence), S-1 DCOD (Ranch or
Farm Residence, Desert Character Overlay District), and
RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District)
Request To PUD DCOD, Pending PUD (Planned Unit Development,
Desert Character Overlay District, Pending Planned Unit
Development) and PUD (Planned Unit Development)
Proposed Use Single-family Residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #3 – Information Only – GPA-DSTV-1-18-2,
Item #5 – Information Only – Z-TA-5-18-2, and Item #6 – Information Only – Z-75-18-2.
Committee member Julie Read arrived to the meeting during this item, bringing the
quorum to 5 members.
3 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve, will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes per
acre, and will have 7 miles of trails and community paths. She discussed the
application requests to rezone to PUD, amend the General Plan, and amend the Desert
Character Overlay District. She also discussed the extension and build out of Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt also discussed the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife
Federation (NWF). She discussed the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. She noted the NWF landscape palette, pedestrian
circulation, and open edge plan.
Vice Chair Shannon Simon asked about the timeline for constructing Sonoran Desert
Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that the buildout for Sonoran Desert Drive will cost
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 330
approximately $120 million and there is no defined timeline. She stated that the
development will complete a Traffic Impact Study to determine the level of service and
the necessary improvements.
Committee member Michelle Ricart asked whether the applicant reached out to the
school district. Susan Demmitt stated that they are working with the school district on
a donation agreement. She added that there will be no modifications to the boundaries
of the school district and students living in the development will be within the boundary
of Desert Mountain schools.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, expressed concerns with
removal of the Desert Character Overlay. He stated that areas adjacent to preserve
areas should be low density. He also expressed concerns regarding increased traffic.
Paul Grayczyk, president of the Sonoran Gate Home Owner’s Association, encouraged
larger setbacks from Sonoran Desert Drive.
Bob Thompson, a member of the public, stated that the beauty of the area should be
maintained. He added that the developer should honor the Desert Character Overlay
and keep the preserve areas as is.
Susan Demmitt stated that she had no additional comments or responses at this time,
but will continue dialogue with the community going forward.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 331
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-62-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting November 8, 2018
Request From S-1 DCOD (155.14 acres), S-1 (343.04 acres) and RE-
35 DCOD (10.24 acres)
Request To PUD DCOD (pending PUD) (165.99 acres) and PUD
(343.04 acres)
Proposed Use Single-family Residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, presented the information to the Village regarding MacEwen
480 PUD. She addressed the history of the site and the current requests to ultimately
build 1,420 homes. She addressed that a portion of the 480 acres is within the Desert
Character Overlay District and the North Land Use Plan. She stated they are working
with the Deer Valley School District to come up with a solution to the school capacity
issue. She stated they are looking into the option of Cave Creek Schools.
Tim Mitten, VPC member, expressed several concerns:
- Traffic safety and cyclist safety on Sonoran Desert Drive.
- Public safety response time.
- Elimination of the night sky.
- Density is too high.
He then asked if the applicant has been in communication with the State Land
Department to see when the surrounding land will be opened for auction. Susan
Demmitt stated it won’t be within the next 5 years.
Jason Stokes, VPC member, asked where the closest fire station is located. Ms.
Demmitt stated Cave Creek and Dynamite.
Steve Tucker, VPC member, asked what would happen in the notch. Ms. Demmitt
states most likely residential. Mr. Tucker stated that the road improvements to Sonoran
Desert Drive need to happen before development.
Julie Read, VPC member, asked how many homes are approved for Sonoran Gate. Ms.
Demmitt responded 255 homes.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 332
Shannon Simon, VPC member, inquired about the City’s timeline for the complete build
out of Sonoran Desert Drive. She stated the light pollution from Sonoran Gate isn’t as
bad as she thought. Ms. Simon then asked if all the neighborhoods will be gated. Ms.
Demmitt responded that some neighborhoods will be gated.
Julie Read, VPC member, stated she has concerns about the school capacity issue and
the fact that some of the students could be going to Cave Creek Schools. She stated
that a neighborhood elementary school builds a sense of community. Ms. Read asked
what the target market will be for this development. Ms. Demmitt states they are still
trying to identify the target. Julie Read asked how many children there are in Sonoran
Gate. A resident in the audience who lives in Sonoran Gate stated about 1 in 8 homes
have kids.
Michelle Ricart, VPC member, stated that Sonoran Gate has a lot of amenities for kids
so there might not be a lot of kids right now but they can come. She stated she is
concerned with the school capacity. She said that it is at least a 20 to 25-minute drive to
the closest Cave Creek elementary school by car, so it would be even longer by bus.
Susan Demmitt stated that Taylor Morrison is committed to working with the school
districts to find a solution.
Michelle Ricart, VPC member, stated she is concerned about school buses going in and
out of the neighborhood with the traffic and the speeds vehicles travel along Sonoran
Desert Drive. She also stated open enrollment can be deceiving because students can
get kicked out of the school.
The floor was open to public comment.
Michelle Kelly, resident, stated she was opposed to the request. She stated she is
concerned about the density. She stated she lives in Sonoran Foothills, which is lower
in density than the proposed project. She stated that Sonoran Foothills Elementary land
was gifted by the developer. She is concerned about police and fire response times.
She stated the project is too dense without the proper infrastructure in place.
Burt Bragin, resident, voiced his concerns about Sonoran Desert Drive and the current
traffic. He stated the connection to the 303 needs to be made before the project is
approved. He stated Sonoran Foothills has 1,300 homes and a school was gifted by the
developer. He stated this development has 6 to 7 times more homes that Sonoran Gate.
Susan Demmitt, applicant, stated that Deer Valley Schools doesn’t want a school site at
this location.
Cynthia Wise, resident, stated she is in favor of the request. She said Taylor Morrison
did a great job with the current infrastructure improvements within Sonoran Gate.
Gary Kirkilas, resident, stated he is a park steward for the Apache Wash trailhead. He
stated this development would change the entire character of the area. He then asked
the developer how they will make it look like the preserve.
J.R. Oliver, resident, stated she lives in Sonoran Foothills and has to wait a long time to
get out of her subdivision. She stated the connection to the 303 would help a lot.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 333
Susan Demmitt, applicant, stated that is more of a regional issue and to talk to the City’s
Street Transportation Department.
Sue Pierce, resident, stated she opposes the project and is a resident of Desert
Enclave. She said on the way to the meeting they had to wait until 56 cars went by to
turn out. She stated this development will have an adverse reaction on the desert
wildlife and preserve area. She stated this development is in contradiction of the
Sonoran Preserve Master Plan.
L. Chicchillo, resident, stated the current Taylor Morrison project looks like row houses.
He stated he lives in Desert Enclave and is worried about the traffic.
Spero Papos, resident, asked if the land had been purchased. The applicant confirmed
it had not been purchased yet. He inquired about traffic lights.
Julie Read, VPC member asked if the applicant has met with ADOT because they
would like to see more information about the project.
There was then a committee discussion about how Dove Valley Road, Cave Creek
Road and 27th Avenue all get flooded out in the monsoon storms.
Tim Mitten, VPC member, stated that the North Gateway minutes will be forwarded onto
the Desert View VPC with their packet so they are aware of the discussion that took
place.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 334
Attachment E
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-62-18-2
Date of VPC Meeting March 10, 2022
Request From S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence), S-1 DCOD (Ranch or
Farm Residence, Desert Character Overlay District), and
RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District)
Request To PUD DCOD, Pending PUD (Planned Unit Development,
Desert Character Overlay District, Pending Planned Unit
Development) and PUD (Planned Unit Development)
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC Recommendation Approval, subject to stipulations, with a modification to
Stipulation No. 1, regarding an updated development
narrative
VPC Vote 4-1
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #4 – Z-TA-5-18-2, Item #5 – Z-75-18-2, and
Item #6 – GPA-DSTV-18-2.
10 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Julianna Pierre provided information regarding Z-TA-5-18-2, a text amendment to
revise the applicability area and associated text for the Desert Maintenance Overlay
District (DMOD) of the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD). She explained the
permitted uses and standards for the two sub-districts in the DMOD, Sub-District A and
Sub-District B. She explained that the southern boundary of the DMOD aligns with the
Northeast Outerloop Freeway alignment outlined in the Peripheral Areas C and D Plan.
Julianna Pierre explained that applicant’s proposed modifications would remove Sub-
District A standards from the property south of Sonoran Desert Drive and west of Cave
Creek Wash. Additionally, the land south of Sonoran Desert Drive and east of Cave
Creek Wash, currently in Sub-District A, would become part of Sub-District B. She
stated that staff’s recommendation is to only remove Sub-District A standards from an
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 335
approximately 155.06-acre portion of the original request. She added that the text
amendment also includes changes to the Zoning Ordinance and the staff
recommendation is for approval of Z-TA-5-18-2 to amend the applicability area and
associated text for the DMOD of the DCOD as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report.
Julianna Pierre explained that Z-75-18-2 is the rezoning case associated with the
aforementioned text amendment and would remove the DCOD designation from the
zoning districts. She explained that the applicant proposed and staff recommended
areas were identical to those in Z-TA-5-18-2, but the staff recommendation for Z-75-18-
2 is denial as filed, approval of the staff recommended area.
Julianna Pierre explained that GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 was a request from Preserves /
Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre,
Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre, and Preserves / Floodplain to Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre
/ Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Preserves / Floodplain, with removal of
the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (IPO). She explained that the IPO acted as a timing
element to ensure growth was concentrated within the Infrastructure Limit Line (ILL), a
guide to where the City would extend water and sewer infrastructure to support
development. She stated that significant investment and development has occurred
within the boundaries of the ILL and there are opportunities to revisit the overlay and
reassess development beyond the ILL. She added that staff is recommending approval
of GPA-DSTV-1-18-2.
Julianna Pierre stated that Z-62-18-2 is a rezoning request of 488.63 acres at the
southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive from S-1
DCOD, S-1, and RE-35 DCOD to PUD DCOD (pending PUD) and PUD. She added
that the proposed PUD will allow single-family residential development.
Julianna Pierre stated that the development is proposing a master-planned residential
community with a maximum 1,420 units at a density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre.
There will be a collection of single-family neighborhoods with various amenities, open
spaces, and a pedestrian network. She also discussed the permitted uses, connectivity
to the adjacent Sonoran Preserve, open space, and amenities.
Julianna Pierre reviewed the community input received since 2018, which included 82
letters in opposition and 6 letters in support. She stated that the letters in opposition
expressed concerns regarding: road infrastructure, increased traffic, decreased resident
safety, preserve areas not maintained for outdoor activities, negative impacts on the
area’s natural flora and fauna, maintaining the requirements for the DCOD, density,
number of units, water resources, Sonoran Desert Drive remaining a scenic corridor, the
proposed development not matching the character of the area, strain on the school
district, and lack of amenities to support the development.
Julianna Pierre reviewed the staff finding and stipulations for Z-62-18-2, noting that
Stipulation No. 1 had corrections to the PUD name and date stamped date. She added
that staff recommended approval, subject to stipulations.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve and will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 336
per acre. She discussed the history of applicable plans that apply to the site, such as
the DMCO, Peripheral Areas C and D Plan, and Phoenix General Plan. She explained
that the Verdin property was always intended to develop as residential. She also
discussed the eventual build out of Sonoran Desert Drive and the infrastructure
improvements that Verdin developers will build along Sonoran Desert Drive. She also
noted that developers are working with the Deer Valley Unified School District.
Alex Steadman, representative with RVi, stated that the Verdin development will have
a unique vision and design approach. He discussed the partnership with the National
Wildlife Federation (NWF), noting the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. He discussed the certified habitat open space areas,
specifically the preserved habitat, re-established habitat, and maintained open space.
He stated that the playscapes will include nature trails with education nodes, parks,
trailheads, informative signage, and community amenities. He also provided an
example of the NWF landscape palette.
Alex Steadman also discussed the pedestrian circulation and edge openness plans.
He stated that the development will have an open trailhead for the public, which
includes public parking, community gathering spaces, and access to water. He added
that there will be a variable edge adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve and Mesquite Wash.
He also noted that the Verdin PUD provides parallels to the DCOD.
Vice Chair Shannon Simon appreciated the thoughtful design of the development and
stated that the project was high quality.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, provided a presentation and
discussed the importance of the DCOD. He stated that the DCOD was intended to
maintain the fragile undisturbed areas of the wildlife corridor along the Cave Creek
Wash, a major floodway and floodplain. He added that the Zoning Ordinance discusses
how development in the DCOD should blend with the undisturbed desert environment
rather than dominate it. He added the DCOD states that the Dynamite Boulevard
alignment acts as the southern boundary, and makes no reference to Sonoran Desert
Drive. He added that moving the DCOD boundary further north eliminates the purpose
of the overlay.
Patrick McMullen, President of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council,
appreciated the applicant linking the development to the Sonoran Preserve, but still had
concerns regarding removal of the DCOD, especially when the DCOD would dictate the
number of units permitted on the site. He also expressed concerns regarding the width
of the trail along the Mesquite Wash.
Susanne Rothwell, a member of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, stated
that the Sonoran Collaborative assisted with writing the DCOD chapter of the Zoning
Ordinance and there was an enormous amount of research regarding the fragile
corridors in the area. She requested lower density and single-story residences. She
added that DCOD should remain in place.
Ann Wilde, a member of the public, stated that development should not affect the
desert character. She stated that development should occur with the DCOD in place.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 337
Cynthia Weiss, a resident of Sonoran Gate, the closest residential development to
Verdin, appreciated Verdin’s thoughtful development.
Kara Nicholls, a member of the public who lives adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve,
stated that she was excited about Verdin providing a connection to the northern and
southern portions of the Preserve. She appreciated the NWF collaboration and stated
this development will aid in home ownership since homes on an acre are unobtainable
for many.
Rob Nash-Boulden, a member of the public, asked the Village Planning Committee to
reconsider and deny the request to remove the DCOD from the site. He stated that the
DCOD should be retained. He also expressed concern that the development will be
built with no close connections to services.
Robert Thompson, a member of the public, disagreed with the change in zoning.
Jennifer Ruby, a member of the public, stated that Verdin will be a vibrant place for
people to live. She noted that the project is low density and thoughtful with accessible
housing.
Keeli Keeler, a member of the public, stated that the DCOD should remain in place and
that the proposed number of units will change the desert character.
Susan Demmitt stated that standards outlined in the DCOD have been taken into
account and worked into the Verdin project. She added that the land adjacent to
Sonoran Desert Drive is expected to develop in the future and Verdin will act as a
precedent for what’s to come.
MOTION: Committee member Daniel Tome made a motion to approve Z-62-18-2,
subject to stipulations and a modification to Stipulation No. 1, regarding an updated
development narrative. The motion was seconded by Vice Chair Shannon Simon.
VOTE: 4-1 with Committee members Simon, Kreiger, Ricart, and Tome in favor and
Chair Stokes in opposition.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
The VPC recommended approval with modification. Per the recommendation, the
stipulations for the case are as follows.
Recommended Stipulations:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Sendero Foothills VERDIN PUD
reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval
of this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the
Development Narrative date stamped November 29, 2021 MARCH 3, 2022, as
modified by the following stipulations:
a. Page 23, Section 1.d.Accessory uses.(1): Revise to read, “permanent
and/or temporary alcoholic beverage and/or food sales and/or
consumption;”
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 338
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is
reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall provide signal warrant
analysis for development access points along Sonoran Desert Drive as well as
7th Street and Dove Valley Road. The developer will be responsible for all
additional dedications and/or roadway and signal improvements as identified by
the approved study.
3. The developer shall submit Master Street Design and Phasing Plans for each
Development Unit, as required by Section 636, Planned Community District
(PCD), of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
4. All designated public roadways shall meet the City of Phoenix Storm Water
Design Manual Standards for wash crossings.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping, and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
6. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
7. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
8. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 339
Attachment F
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-62-18-2
Date of VPC Meeting April 5, 2022
Request From S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence), S-1 DCOD (Ranch or
Farm Residence, Desert Character Overlay District), and
RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District)
Request To PUD DCOD, Pending PUD (Planned Unit Development,
Desert Character Overlay District, Pending Planned Unit
Development) and PUD (Planned Unit Development)
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC Recommendation Approval, with modifications and additional stipulations
VPC Vote 10-1
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
Cases Z-TA-5-18-2, Z-75-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, and Z-62-18-2 were heard
concurrently.
Five requests to speak in favor and five requests to speak in opposition were made for
this request.
Committee member Reginald Younger joined during this item, bringing quorum to 10.
Committee member Jill Hankins joined during this item, bringing quorum to 11.
Committee member Mark Warren joined during this item, bringing quorum to 12.
Committee member Reginald Younger left during this item, bringing quorum to 11.
Staff Presentation
Julianna Pierre, staff, provided a combined presentation for companion cases Z-TA-5-
18-2, Z-75-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, and Z-62-18-2. Ms. Pierre reviewed the history of
the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD) and the alignment of Sonoran Desert
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 340
Drive. She explained that staff recommends a more limited area to be removed from the
DOCD, as shown on the map in the staff report. She explained that the Z-75-18-2 case
mirrors the text amendment case, updating the zoning designation to remove the
overlay district, and that staff recommends denial as filed, approval of the staff
recommended area. Ms. Pierre went on to review the General Plan Amendment,
describing the history and purpose of the designations, noting that staff recommends
approval. She then provided an overview of the PUD proposal in Rezoning Case Z-62-
18-2, reviewing the land use proposal and site plan, connectivity proposal, open space
provisions, and amenities. She discussed the community input that has been received
and summarized written materials. Finally, she noted that staff recommends approval
with stipulations.
Applicant Presentation
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, summarized the history of
the site and planning efforts for the proposed project. She stated that the subject site is
private property and has never been designated to be part of a preserve area. She
reviewed the surrounding area, summarized the applicant’s proposal, and discussed
new proposed stipulations that she suggested the committee incorporate into its
approval. She summarized the purpose of the Desert Character Overlay District and
stated that the impact of removing the overlay would allow a master planned community
with density spread to the whole site.
Alex Stedman, representative with RVi, discussed the design approach and
relationship to the surrounding open space, including the partnership with the National
Wildlife Federation. He shared a map that indicated the proposed certified habitat open
spaces within the site, discussed the proposed landscape palette and plant list, and
stated that the Mesquite Wash would serve as a connector between the north and south
portions of the preserve. He reviewed the edge openness plan and the design of open
edges with public trail access points. Finally, he described the elements of the DCOD
that have been incorporated into the design of the development.
Susan Demmitt described the additional stipulations – which include a reduced density
limit, elimination of the smallest lot size, an additional open space buffer along the
eastern property line, public access easements at certain locations, and a multi-use trail
easement along the wash corridor – proposed by the applicant and requested that the
committee incorporate the additional stipulations into their approval. Additionally, she
stated that the subject site has always been designated for development in the City’s
General Plan and the proposed density is within the limits of the designation and that
the applicant hopes to set a good example of appropriate development in this corridor.
Committee Questions
Vice Chair Lagrave asked about the designation of 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre in
the General Plan Amendment, which is not necessary to facilitate the proposed project.
He further asked about the southeast corner and if it would make sense to donate the
land to the Parks and Recreation Department.
Susan Demmitt replied that the applicant would be open to removing the General Plan
classification of 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and that the applicant would be willing to
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 341
work with the Parks and Recreation Department on a dedication of the southeast corner
of the site if it was of interest to the City.
Committee Member Nowell asked about the development parcel allocation table in
which the numbers for individual parcels do not add up to the total for the full site. Ms.
Demmitt replied that the individual parcels have flexibility in the unit totals, but the
overall total cannot exceed the maximum for the full site.
Mr. Nowell asked if homeowners would be prohibited from planting non-native plants.
Mr. Stedman replied that individual homeowners would be required to follow the plant
list for the PUD. Committee Member Reynolds added that rear yard plant prohibitions
are possible and are done in other communities, asking further if fruit trees will be
prohibited in the community. Mr. Stedman replied that the applicant team would explore
the idea.
Mr. Nowell asked how many lots would be affected by the base flood elevation and how
much those houses would need to be elevated.
Nguyen Lam, representative with Hilgart Wilson, replied that it would primarily be lots
fronting on the Mesquite Wash, but they don’t have a precise number since the parcels
haven’t been finalized. He added that they would raise the houses to 1 foot above the
base flood elevation.
Ms. Reynolds asked if the natural preservation areas will be marked so the community
knows where they are. Mr. Stedman replied that they have discussed signage with the
NWF and there are opportunities to do signage. Ms. Demmitt added that the applicant
wants the public to recognize that these are public benefits.
Committee Member Kollar asked for clarification on the DCOD removal area. Ms.
Pierre replied that staff is recommending only the Verdin site be removed from the
DCOD at this time and any other sites would need to be evaluated on a case-by-case
basis. Ms. Demmitt added that the package of commitments from the specific PUD
justifies the removal of the DCOD.
Mr. Nowell asked for clarification on making motions with amendments. Vice Chair
Lagrave replied that the committee can make the appropriate amendments in their
motions.
Public Comments
Gary Kirkilas introduced himself and provided a history of the DCOD, noting that its
purpose was to maintain the Cave Creek Wash. He stated that the entire Cave Creek
Wash needs to be protected and that the DCOD boundaries should be at the Dynamite
Boulevard alignment, not moved to the north. He further stated that DCOD only applies
to one-third of the property, allowing the developer to build on the site without removing
the DCOD. He stated that he believes the committee should vote yes on development
but keep the DCOD in place.
Donald Bessler introduced himself and stated that he believes this is a property rights
issue and that more housing should be built, adding that he supports the proposal and
believes it will be a good product.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 342
Susanne Rothwell introduced herself and stated that the Desert View Village Planning
Committee voted in favor of the DCOD when it was originally written. She stated that
everyone was in favor of it at the time and it was a great piece of planning and
legislation.
Brian Sullivan introduced himself, noting that he has worked and spent much time in
the preserve area, and stated that there are maps that show this area designated for
acquisition and preservation. He stated that minimizing density would limit the impact to
wildlife and that preserving the flats is important.
Sue Pierce introduced herself and stated the concern that the work that goes into
making plans can be easily reversed by a developer who doesn’t have a full
understanding of the issues.
Kara Nicholls introduced herself and stated that Phoenix needs attainable housing
because of its rapid growth rate. She noted that people are having trouble finding
homes in the area and that the developer has done a great job with the proposed
development.
Jennifer Ruby introduced herself and stated that the proposed development is a great
opportunity for the community and that it would provide housing for all the new jobs
coming to the north Phoenix area.
Cynthia Weiss introduced herself and stated that she supports the proposal because
there are other active families that want to live in this location near all of the open space
amenities.
James Gaston introduced himself and stated that he does not agree with removing the
DCOD and believes one home per acre is appropriate. He further noted that there is
academic research, stating concerns about groundwater issues in regard to
overdevelopment.
Sara Altieri introduced herself and stated that she knew the area would change over
time when she bought a home nearby. She stated that the development incorporates
sensitivity to natural wildlife.
Applicant Response
Susan Demmitt stated that she feels the applicant has addressed the concerns and
would be happy to discuss any follow up questions.
Committee Discussion
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that he was originally in favor of the R1-10 designation and
that he is concerned about keeping the DCOD in the northern portion because it would
push more density into the southern portion. He stated that he believes the
development will allow wildlife to flourish and that he supports the project.
Committee Member Israel asked if there is a current allowance for housing on the site.
Vice Chair Lagrave replied that there is.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 343
Committee Member Powell stated that this site is far from the 101 and I-17 freeways
and should be the lowest density. He stated the concern about other sites along the
corridor seeking higher densities, adding that he doesn’t believe the request is in
character and is not in favor of moving the DCOD line. He further stated that the homes
in this development will not be affordable or attainable and that there is room in other
parts of the village that could be developed at higher densities, closer to the freeway.
Committee Member Santoro stated that the PUD is very thorough and thoughtful and
that she appreciates the reduction in density. She stated that she does not agree with
the current alignment of the DCOD line and that the majority of the property is in
alignment with the DCOD guidelines.
Committee Member Nowell stated that he believes the proposal is a good
compromise, even though it is not perfect, adding that he would like to see the approved
plant include particular restrictions in the back yards of individual homes.
Chair Bowser stated that it is important to remember that the proposal is to eliminate
the DCOD at the site in exchange for an entire new set of rules outlined in the PUD. He
further stated that one house per acre is not a desirable type of development, noting the
downsides to one-acre lot development, including that it’s not walkable and people do
not know their neighbors.
Committee Member Hankins stated that she would be in favor of the development if it
were closer to existing infrastructure and that she is concerned about the costs of
infrastructure driving up home prices.
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that affordable housing is typically found in other parts of the
city and that he believes that infrastructure costs will be lower for future developments.
MOTION – Z-62-18-2
Vice Chair Lagrave made a motion for approval with modifications to Stipulation 1,
regarding an updated development narrative, and the following additional stipulations:
1. Modify the Verdin PUD document as necessary to reflect a maximum overall
unit count of 1,250 units and a maximum overall density of 2.6 units per acre.
2. Modify the Verdin PUD document as necessary to remove the Small Lot
(SFR-3) Land Use District.
3. A minimum 25-foot open space tract shall be provided along the eastern
boundary of the Verdin property to provide a transition to the Cave Creek
Wash corridor. The open space tract shall be considered a Certified Area
Type “B” – Natural Revegetated Area with plant materials from the Verdin
PUD Plant List: Green List.
4. The developer shall work with the City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation
Department to provide public trail access easement for the Mesquite Wash
Corridor Trail and Community Paseo Paths that provide connection to the
Sonoran Preserve as depicted in Exhibit 6, Pedestrian Circulation Plan, in the
PUD document. The public access shall be designed to restrict unauthorized
motor vehicle access, as approved by the parks and recreation department.
The location and design of trail connections shall be coordinated with the City
of Phoenix.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 344
5. A minimum 12-foot wide multi-use trail (MUT) shall be constructed within an
average 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE) along the Mesquite
Wash in accordance with Section 429 of the City of Phoenix MAG
Supplemental Details, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
Committee Member Warren seconded the motion.
VOTE
10-1, the motion for approval with modifications and additional stipulations passed;
Members Dean, Hankins, Israel, Kollar, Nowell, Reynolds, Santoro, Warren, Lagrave,
and Bowser in favor; Member Powell against.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
The VPC recommended approval with modifications and additional stipulations. Per
that recommendation, the stipulations for the case are as follows:
Recommended Stipulations:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Sendero Foothills VERDIN PUD
reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval
of this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the
Development Narrative date stamped November 29, 2021 MARCH 3, 2022, as
modified by the following stipulations:
a. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REFLECT A MAXIMUM OVERALL UNIT COUNT OF 1,250 UNITS AND
A MAXIMUM OVERALL DENSITY OF 2.6 UNITS PER ACRE.
b. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REMOVE THE SMALL LOT (SFR-3) LAND USE DISTRICT.
c. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REFLECT A MINIMUM 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT PROVIDED
ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE VERDIN PROPERTY TO
PROVIDE A TRANSITION TO THE CAVE CREEK WASH CORRIDOR.
THE OPEN SPACE TRACT SHALL BE CONSIDERED A CERTIFIED
AREA TYPE “B” – NATURAL REVEGETATED AREA WITH PLANT
MATERIALS FROM THE VERDIN PUD PLANT LIST: GREEN LIST.
d. Page 23, Section 1.d.Accessory uses.(1): Revise to read, “permanent
and/or temporary alcoholic beverage and/or food sales and/or
consumption;”
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is
reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall provide signal warrant
analysis for development access points along Sonoran Desert Drive as well as
7th Street and Dove Valley Road. The developer will be responsible for all
additional dedications and/or roadway and signal improvements as identified by
the approved study.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 345
3. The developer shall submit Master Street Design and Phasing Plans for each
Development Unit, as required by Section 636, Planned Community District
(PCD), of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
4. All designated public roadways shall meet the City of Phoenix Storm Water
Design Manual Standards for wash crossings.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping, and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
6. THE DEVELOPER SHALL WORK WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX PARKS AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS
EASEMENTS FOR THE MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND
COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS THAT PROVIDE CONNECTION TO THE
SONORAN PRESERVE AS DEPICTED IN EXHIBIT 6, PEDESTRIAN
CIRCULATION PLAN, IN THE PUD DOCUMENT. THE PUBLIC ACCESS
SHALL BE DESIGNED TO RESTRICT UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE
ACCESS, AS APPROVED BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION
DEPARTMENT. THE LOCATION AND DESIGN OF TRAIL CONNECTIONS
SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX.
7. A MINIMUM 12-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL (MUT) SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED WITHIN AN AVERAGE 30-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL
EASEMENT (MUTE) ALONG THE MESQUITE WASH IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SECTION 429 OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX MAG SUPPLEMENTAL DETAILS,
AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
8. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
9. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
10. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 346
Attachment G
ADDENDUM A
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
Verdin PUD
April 26, 2022
North Gateway Village Planning March 10, 2022
Committee Meeting Date
Desert View Village Planning April 5, 2022
Committee Meeting Date
Planning Commission Hearing Date May 5, 2022
Request From S-1 DCOD (Ranch or Farm Residence, Desert
Character Overlay District) (144.82 acres), S-1
(Ranch or Farm Residence) (333.57 acres),
RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence
District, Desert Character Overlay District)
(10.24 acres)
Request To PUD DCOD (Pending PUD) (Planned Unit
Development, Desert Character Overlay
District, pending Planned Unit Development)
(155.06 acres), PUD (Planned Unit
Development) (333.57 acres)
Proposed Use Planned Unit Development to allow single-
family residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment
and Sonoran Desert Drive
Owner MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Applicant Taylor Morrison/Arizona, Inc.
Representative Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff Recommendation Approval, subject to stipulations
The purpose of this addendum is to revise the staff recommended stipulations, as
requested by the applicant:
• Modification to the maximum number of dwelling units and addition of that
number to the development standards,
• Modifications to the height of primary ornamental entry signs,
• Modifications to the plant palette,
• Addition of public trail access easements for the Mesquite Wash Corridor Trail
and Community Paseo Paths,
• Requirement for a trail and easement along the Mesquite Wash,
• Addition of a 25-foot-wide open space tract along the eastern boundary of the
property,
Page 347
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-62-18-2
April 26, 2022
• Dedication of 16 acres at the southeast corner of the property to the City of
Phoenix Parks and Recreation Department.
Additionally, this addendum provides community correspondence received since the
staff report was published.
The North Gateway Village Planning Committee (VPC) heard this request on March 10,
2022, and recommended approval with modifications by a 4-1 vote. The modifications
included revisions to the development name and date stamp in Stipulation No. 1.
During the meeting, discussion occurred regarding the proposal – both support and
concerns – such as compatibility with standards outlined in the Desert Character
Overlay District, density, and guidelines for a development adjacent to the Sonoran
Preserve. Since this meeting, Taylor Morrison has worked with the community to revise
standards in the Development Narrative.
The Desert View VPC heard this request on April 5, 2022, and recommended approval
with modifications and additional stipulations by a 10-1 vote. The modifications included
the following:
• Revisions to the development name and date stamp in Stipulation No. 1,
The additional VPC recommended stipulations included the following:
• Modifications to reflect a maximum overall unit count of 1,250 units and a
maximum overall density of 2.6 units per acre,
• Removal of the Small Lot (SFR-3) land use district,
• Addition of a minimum 25-foot-wide open space tract along the eastern boundary
of the property,
• Addition of public trail access easements for the Mesquite Wash Corridor Trail
and Community Paseo Paths,
• Requirement for a trail and easement along the Mesquite Wash.
During the meeting, discussion occurred regarding the proposal, specifically noting
protection of Cave Creek Wash, additional housing product, retention of the Desert
Character Overlay District, groundwater issues, and sensitivity to natural wildlife.
Dwelling Units
The applicant has requested to decrease the maximum number of units for the proposal
from 1,420 to 1,250 dwelling units, thus changing the overall density from 3.0 to 2.6
dwelling units per acre. Therefore, staff is recommending that Stipulation Nos. 1.a and
1.b require the maximum unit count and overall density to be updated throughout the
Development Narrative.
Additionally, the dwelling units and development parcel allocation are outlined in Section
4, Regulatory Standards and Land Use Districts, of the Development Narrative.
Stipulation Nos. 1.i and 1.j require the maximum unit count and a footnote referencing
the development parcel allocation table be added to the Single-Family Land Use District
Development Standards table.
Page 348
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-62-18-2
April 26, 2022
Land Use Districts
The proposal utilizes land use districts as an alternative to traditional zoning districts.
Each land use district regulates the product type and development standards. After
discussions with the community and VPC, the applicant decided to remove the Single-
Family Residential – Small Lot (SFR-3) district and focus on districts with larger lots.
The SFR-3 district would have accommodated attached and detached single-family
dwellings on minimum 3,000 square foot lots and had the highest density attainable in
the development. Stipulation No. 1.c requires any references to the SFR-3 district to be
removed from the Development Narrative and the applicant will update unit counts and
percentages accordingly.
Signage
The applicant had clarified that the maximum lettering and copy height for the Primary
Ornamental Entry signs is 16 feet to accommodate grading issues and being directly
adjacent to Sonoran Desert Drive, a major arterial that will have a total of 6 lanes in the
future. Stipulation Nos. 1.k and 1.s ensure that the correct height is formalized in the
Development Narrative.
Plant Palette
The Development Narrative contains a plant palette that lists desert plants typically
found in the Sonoran Desert of north Phoenix. The green list includes desert plants
allowed within all areas of the PUD, as well as open space and common areas
immediately adjacent to the edges of the subject site. The yellow list includes Sonoran
Desert native and non-native plants that are representative of southwestern deserts.
The yellow list plants may be used within all areas of the PUD, except for open spaces
and common areas immediately adjacent to the edges of the subject site.
The applicant clarified two modifications to the proposed plant palette: removal of
“Chilopsis Linearis – Desert Willow” from the green list and addition to the yellow list
and removal of “Celtis Reticulata – Netleaf Hackberry” from the yellow list and addition
to the green list. Stipulation Nos. 1.m, 1.n, 1.q, and 1.r formalize the changes to the
plant palette.
The applicant has collaborated with the National Wildlife Federation (NWF) to determine
an appropriate plant palette for the development and the NWF has approved the plant
palette. Stipulation No. 1.e to removes the word “approved” from any refences to the
plant palette. This change will avoid confusion since the plant palette has not been
approved by the City’s Landscape Architect.
Trails, Easements, and Open Space
The development will have a public trail (Mesquite Wash Trail) developed along the
Mesquite Wash Corridor. The Mesquite Wash Trail will be a 12-foot-wide natural
surface multi-use public trail within a 30-foot-wide public multi-use trail easement along
Page 349
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-62-18-2
April 26, 2022
the east side of the wash. Stipulation No. 7 formalizes the requirement and ensures
that the trail is accessible to the public and built to Maricopa Association of
Governments (MAG) standards. Additionally, Stipulation No. 1.d ensures that the width
of the multi-use trail easement is revised to 30-feet-wide throughout the Development
Narrative.
After the North Gateway VPC meeting, the applicant negotiated additional modifications
regarding easements and open space along the east side of the site with a member of
the City of Phoenix Sonoran Preserve and Mountain Parks/Preserve Committee.
Public trail access easements will be provided for the Mesquite Wash Corridor Trail and
Community Paseo Paths that provide connections to the Sonoran Preserve, as depicted
on the Pedestrian Circulation Plan. These easements will ensure public access to the
Preserve and restrict unauthorized motor vehicle access through the subject site to the
Sonoran Preserve. Additionally, determination of the location and design elements of
the trail connections will be coordinated with the City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation
Department. Stipulation Nos. 1.g and 1.l formalize these changed in the Development
Narrative. Additionally, Stipulation No. 6 ensures that the trail is accessible to the public
as discussed in the Development Narrative.
The applicant also proposes a minimum 25-foot open space tract along the eastern
boundary of the subject site to provide a transition to the Cave Creek Wash corridor.
Additionally, the open space tract will be considered a Certified Area Type “B” – Natural
Revegetated Area which will include plant materials from the Plant Palette: Green List.
Stipulation No. 1.p ensure that the open space tract is discussed in the section of the
Development Narrative regarding the Certified Area Type “B”. Stipulation No. 1.o
updates the Certified Area Open Space Types exhibit to show the 25-foot open space
tract.
The applicant also indicated that they are willing to dedicate approximately 16 acres at
the southeast corner of the development to the City’s Parks and Recreation Department
for inclusion into the Sonoran Preserve. Stipulation No. 1.f ensures that language will
be added to the Development Narrative discussing the dedication and Stipulation No. 8
requires the applicant to continue working with the Parks and Recreation Department to
formalize the dedication.
Proposition 207 Waiver
Staff has not received a completed form for the Waiver of Claims for Diminution in Value
of Property under Proposition 207 (A.R.S. 12-1131 et seq.), as required by the rezoning
application process. Therefore, a stipulation has been added to require the form be
completed and submitted prior to preliminary site plan approval. This is addressed in
Stipulation No. 12.
Page 350
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-62-18-2
April 26, 2022
Community Correspondence
Since the staff report was published, staff has received 37 items of correspondence.
The correspondence is attached to this addendum.
Stipulations
Staff recommends approval per the modified stipulations below:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Sendero Foothills VERDIN PUD
reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval
of this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with
the Development Narrative date stamped November 29, 2021 MARCH 3, 2022,
as modified by the following stipulations:
a. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REFLECT A MAXIMUM OVERALL UNIT COUNT OF 1,250 UNITS AND
A MAXIMUM OVERALL DENSITY OF 2.6 UNITS PER ACRE.. PAGES
6, 8, 26, AND 28: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE MAXIMUM
DENSITY TO 2.6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
b. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REMOVE THE SMALL LOT (SFR-3) LAND USE DISTRICT. PAGES 6,
8, 26, AND 28: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE MAXIMUM
NUMBER OF UNITS TO 1,250 DWELLING UNITS.
c. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REFLECT A MINIMUM 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT PROVIDED
ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE VERDIN PROPERTY TO
PROVIDE A TRANSITION TO THE CAVE CREEK WASH CORRIDOR.
THE OPEN SPACE TRACT SHALL BE CONSIDERED A CERTIFIED
AREA TYPE “B” – NATURAL REVEGETATED AREA WITH PLANT
MATERIALS FROM THE VERDIN PUD PLANT LIST: GREEN LIST.
PAGES 23, 26, 28, 29, 35, 36, 59, 63, 75, 134, 135, AND 136: REMOVE
ALL REFERENCES TO THE “SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL –
SMALL LOT (SFR-3)” LAND USE DISTRICT. UNIT COUNTS AND
PERCENTAGES RELATED TO THIS REMOVAL SHALL BE
UPDATED ACCORDINGLY.
d. PAGES 20, 52, 61, 102, AND 113: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO
THE WIDTH OF THE MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT ALONG THE
MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TO 30-FEET-WIDE.
e. PAGES 51, 71, 75, 76, 83, 86, 87, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110,
119, AND 121: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE “APPROVED
PLANT PALETTE” TO “PLANT PALETTE”.
Page 351
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-62-18-2
April 26, 2022
f. PAGES 8-22, SECTION 2. LAND USE PLAN, AND PAGES 97-123,
SECTION 9. CERTIFIED OPEN SPACE DESIGN GUIDELINES: ADD
LANGUAGE REGARDING CONVEYANCE OF APPROXIMATELY 16
ACRES ADDRESSED IN STIPULATION NO. 8. THERE SHALL BE A
PROVISION FOR BOTH ON SITE OPEN SPACE AND THE
DEDICATED 16 ACRES TO COUNT TOWARDS TOTAL OPEN
SPACE.
g. PAGE 16, OFF-SITE CONNECTIVITY: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING
PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS EASEMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE
MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND COMMUNITY PASEO
PATHS, PER STIPULATION NO. 6. THE SECTION SHALL
SPECIFICALLY NOTE THAT THE ACCESS EASEMENTS WILL
ENSURE PERMANENT PUBLIC ACCESS AND RESTRICT
UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS THROUGH THE
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY TO THE SONORAN PRESERVE.
h Page 23, Section 1.d.Accessory uses.(1): Revise to read, “permanent
d. and/or temporary alcoholic beverage and/or food sales and/or
consumption;”
i. PAGE 35, SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS TABLE: ADD A ROW AFTER MAX. DWELLING UNIT
DENSITY THAT READS “MAXIMUM UNITS: 1,250 DWELLING UNITS
FOR THE ENTIRE PUD AREA”.
j. PAGES 36-37, SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE: ADD A FOOTNOTE THAT
REFERS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL ALLOCATION TABLE IN
SECTION 4.C. (REGULATORY STANDARDS & LAND USE
DISTRICTS – DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS) FOR THE MAXIMUM
UNIT COUNTS FOR EACH DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.
k. PAGE 41, SECTION 6.1: REVISE TO READ, “WHEN NOT
PROHIBITED BY CITY CODE, SECTION 31-13, PRIMARY
ORNAMENTAL ENTRIES NO HIGHER THAN 16-FEET ARE
ALLOWED…”
l. PAGES 52-53, SECTION 2.C: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING PUBLIC
TRAIL ACCESS EASEMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE MESQUITE
WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS, PER
STIPULATION NO. 6. THE SECTION SHOULD SPECIFICALLY NOTE
THAT THE ACCESS EASEMENTS WILL ENSURE PERMANENT
PUBLIC ACCESS AND RESTRICT UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR
VEHICLE ACCESS THROUGH THE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY TO
THE SONORAN PRESERVE.
Page 352
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-62-18-2
April 26, 2022
m. PAGES 90-91, SECTION 6.H: DELETE “CHILOPSIS LINEARIS –
DESERT WILLOW” TREE FROM THE GREEN LIST AND ADD IT TO
THE YELLOW LIST TREES ON PAGE 91.
n. PAGES 90 AND 92, SECTION 6.H: DELETE “CELTIS RETICULATA –
NETLEAF HACKBERRY” SHRUB FROM THE YELLOW LIST AND
ADD IT TO THE GREEN LIST SHRUBS ON PAGE 90.
o. PAGE 101, CERTIFIED AREA OPEN SPACE TYPES EXHIBIT.
UPDATE THE EXHIBIT TO INCLUDE THE 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE
TRACT THAT WILL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE EASTERN
BOUNDARY OF THE SITE AS A CERTIFIED AREA TYPE “B” –
NATURAL REVEGETATED AREA.
p. PAGE 105-108, SECTION 1.D.2: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING THE
MINIMUM 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT THAT WILL BE PROVIDED
ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE SITE TO PROVIDE A
TRANSITION TO THE CAVE CREEK WASH CORRIDOR. EXPLAIN
THAT THE AREA’S PLANT MATERIAL WILL BE FROM THE PLANT
PALETTE GREEN LIST.
q. PAGES 119 AND 121, 1.E. PLANT AND WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP
MATRIX, PLANT PALETTE: GREEN LIST: REMOVE THE IMAGE
AND INFORMATION REGARDING “CHILOPSIS LINEARIS – DESERT
WILLOW” AND ADD TO THE PLANT PALETTE: YELLOW LIST ON
PAGE 121.
r. PAGES 119 AND 122, 1.E. PLANT AND WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP
MATRIX, PLANT PALETTE: YELLOW LIST: REMOVE THE IMAGE
INFORMATION REGARDING “CELTIS RETICULATA – NETLEAF
HACKBERRY” AND ADD TO THE PLANT PALETTE: GREEN LIST
ON PAGE 119.
s. PAGE 123, SECTION 10.1.B: REVISE TO READ, “THE MAXIMUM
HEIGHT FOR PRIMARY ORNAMENTAL ENTRY SIGN LETTERING
AND COPY IS 16 FEET…”
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study
is reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall provide signal warrant
analysis for development access points along Sonoran Desert Drive as well as
7th Street and Dove Valley Road. The developer will be responsible for all
additional dedications and/or roadway and signal improvements as identified by
the approved study.
Page 353
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-62-18-2
April 26, 2022
3. The developer shall submit Master Street Design and Phasing Plans for each
Development Unit, as required by Section 636, Planned Community District
(PCD), of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
4. All designated public roadways shall meet the City of Phoenix Storm Water
Design Manual Standards for wash crossings.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping, and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
6. THE DEVELOPER SHALL WORK WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX PARKS AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS
EASEMENTS FOR THE MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND
COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS THAT PROVIDE CONNECTION TO THE
SONORAN PRESERVE AS DEPICTED ON EXHIBIT 6, PEDESTRIAN
CIRCULATION PLAN, IN THE PUD DOCUMENT DEVELOPMENT
NARRATIVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE PARKS AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. THE PUBLIC ACCESS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO
RESTRICT UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS, AS APPROVED
BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE LOCATION AND DESIGN OF TRAIL
CONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
7. A MINIMUM 12-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL (MUT) SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED WITHIN AN AVERAGE 30-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL
EASEMENT (MUTE) ALONG THE MESQUITE WASH IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION 429 OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX MAG SUPPLEMENTAL
DETAIL, AS MODIFIED TO ADDRESS WASH CORRIDOR CONSTRAINTS
AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
8. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONVEY APPROXIMATELY 16 ACRES
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE WITHIN THE
EROSION HAZARD SETBACK AREA ALONG THE CAVE CREEK WASH
CORRIDOR, AS GENERALLY SHOWN ON EXHIBIT 11 OF THE
DEVELOPMENT NARRATIVE, TO THE CITY OF PHOENIX FOR INCLUSION
IN THE SONORAN PRESERVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE FINAL ACREAGE AND
CONFIGURATION OF THE PROPERTY TO BE CONVEYED, ALONG WITH
TIMING OF THE CONVEYANCE, SHALL BE MUTUALLY AGREED UPON
Page 354
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-62-18-2
April 26, 2022
BY THE DEVELOPER, THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT,
AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
9 If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
8. conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
10 If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
9. Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
11 In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
10. developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
12. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER
SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE
WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDER'S OFFICE AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED
IN THE REZONING APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.
Exhibits
Community Correspondence (75 pages)
Verdin PUD Development Narrative date stamped March 3, 2022
Page 355
From: Don Bessler
To: Julianna Pierre; Joshua Bednarek
Subject: Verdin
Date: Thursday, March 10, 2022 8:12:11 PM
Hello I am a Phoenix resident in the area and I am also a small business owner of a consulting
company P3
from Donald Bessler to Host (privately): 7:22 PM
Systems Management. P3 is the nexus of People - Planet-Profit. P3 understands that
generational solutions reside in understanding the reality of the codependency of these three
perspectives. In my career, I have been responsible for developing critical habitat
management programs including Sonoran Desert Preservation plans, Urban Forestry Plans,
Sustainability Plans and Resiliency Planning. In reviewing the proposal and listening to the
presentations, the consultants and developers have thoughtfully considered the place and the
surroundings. My wife and I are avid users of the trails in the preserve, Sidewinder trail,
Ocotillo.... We have always believed that the area under discussion would become housing;
frankly, as parents of a young man, graduate of ASU and gainfully employed , we are
heartbroken by the reality he faces with home ownership due to a high demand and short
supply. While this product isn't likely to be first home ownership, the domino effect of
residents moving up will free up the housing stock for newer buyers.
from Donald Bessler to Host (privately): 7:22 PM
I want to enter my support for the project.
from Joshua Bednarek to Donald Bessler (privately): 7:28 PM
Thank you, Donald. Would it be possible to send your comments to Julianna Pierre at
julianna.pierre@phoenix.gov? That way we could have your comments for the record.
from Donald Bessler to Host & Presenter: 8:04 PM
please enter my previous comments into the record
--
Donald Bessler, PWLF
President
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
From: Wiele, Larry
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: North Village Planning Committee Comment
Date: Thursday, March 10, 2022 2:53:36 PM
Julianna
I now understand that these comments were due 48 hours prior to the meeting.
While this comment may not become part of the record, I still would like to express my opinion that
while we may not be able to prevent development on private land adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve,
the Village Planning Committee and the City of Phoenix can and should maintain strict Planning
Guidelines and insist that developers of land within the City of Phoenix follow the planning
guidelines that were established to maintain the desert characteristics and minimize the impacts on
our natural resources.
Thanks
Larry Wiele
2413 W Horsetail Trail
Phoenix, AZ 85085
Page 362
From: Vashti Supplee
To: Julianna Pierre; Jarod Rogers
Subject: Verdin Z-TA-5-18-2 (Companion Cases Z-62-18-2, Z-75-18-2, and GPA-DSTV-1-18- 2)
Date: Friday, March 11, 2022 10:05:55 AM
Hello Julianna- I listened to the presentations at the Gateway Village Planning Committee
meeting March 10th. I have also been in conversation with Alex Stedman concerning the
public trails and edge treatments. I consider the efforts by the Verdin team to be excellent and
I agree with the Staff Recommendation with one addition.
The public access trails are a later addition and will end in a wonderful amenity to Verdin
residents and the general recreation public seeking access to the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve. A
stipulation should be added to the zoning that specifically designates Mesquite Wash as a
public access corridor through the Verdin project and that designated access points from the
Verdin project to the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve will be maintained as public access in
cooperation with the Phoenix Parks and Recreation Department.
Phoenix Parks and Recreation may be able to provide better specific wording. The end
objective is to have the public access trails as a condition of the rezoning. I have copied Jarod
Rogers with Phoenix Parks and Recreation.
Sincerely,
Vashti (Tice) Supplee
918 W. Roosevelt Street
Phoenix, AZ 85007
602-380-3722
vsupplee25@gmail.com
Page 363
From: Adam Stranieri
To: PDD Zoning; Gregory L Harmon; Julianna Pierre
Subject: RE: emplandsd - Form Submission
Date: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 8:14:49 AM
Hi Julianna,
Please see below for correspondence regarding Verdin and the associated cases. Please file
accordingly.
Thank you,
Adam Stranieri, Planner III
Planning & Development Department
Planning Division, Zoning Section
Office: 602-262-7142
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
From: no-reply@phoenix.gov
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2022 2:53 PM
To: PDD Development Services
Subject: emplandsd - Form Submission
FROM : Mandy R Fellows
SUBJECT : Verdin Development, Case #'s Z-62-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, Z-TA-5-18, Z75-
18-2
MESSAGE : Hello,
Taylor-Morrison (TM) would have you believe the Desert Character Overlay Sub-Districts A
and B are just "technical Clean-ups" as stated on their website.
As if the City of Phoenix didn't already spend MILLIONS in studies saying specifically how
the area should be developed. They'd like to tell you it was suppose to be amended when the
Sonoran Desert Pkwy alignment was built. If that were the case, why do they need an
amendment to change it then?
Its not a matter of being against development - its a matter of following the rules already set in
place by many years and many dollars used to study this area!
Taylor- Morrison needs to revise their PUD to be in alignment with the Overlays and current
Zoning ordinances, not the other way around! Its going to cost the City millions to run the
infrastructure needed for this development, not to mention DESTROYING miles and miles of
Preserve for this leap-frog development.
TM will tell you that the proposed density of 1,420 in the middle of the desert, a leap-frog
Page 364
development at that, can only be profitable with those numbers......then clearly they are the
ones trying to fool you. With current housing sales and prices, a developer such as Toll
Brothers would absolutely have no problem developing 1-2 units per acre, selling them at
1.5M and turning a nice profit.
I'm sure this letter will fall on deep pockets and deaf-ears, as we have all been conditioned by
these mega-corporations to only care about profits.
However, the Planning and Developments DUTY is to uphold the years and years of studies,
decisions, and plans that are in place for this area!
In addition, due to the exact location between to major washes and floodplains, I formally
request that FEMA due a study regarding the amount of fill dirt that will be removed and
impacting the designated flood areas. I hope the Planning and Development doesn't put undo
lives in the middle of tragedy when those two low lying bridges get washed out and the
residents have no way to escape, seeing as their access roads are between the two bridges!
Again - lets not talk Units until we've talked about Lives!
Thank you for your attention,
Mandy Fellows
Phoenix Resident since 1991
Email : mandy.fellows12@yahoo.com
AREA : 602
PHONE : 6023093226
ADDRESS : 1615 W. Blue Sky Dr.
CITY : Phoenix
STATE : AZ
ZIP : 85085
Submission ID: 31686fa92d944f1386ba53a11879a0ec
Form Submission On : 3/14/2022 2:52:30 PM
Referer: https://phoenix.gov/pdd
This is Not Spam - This message is sent on behalf of the City of Phoenix.
Please handle appropriately.
Page 365
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: emdist2 - Form Submission
Date: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 10:07:47 AM
Please add to the public record
From: no-reply@phoenix.gov
Date: Monday, March 14, 2022 at 4:45 PM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: emdist2 - Form Submission
FROM : Rob Nash-Boulden
SUBJECT : Verdin Rezoning
MESSAGE : Councilman Waring,
I appreciate that you meet your constituents in your district and had the pleasure of meeting
you F2F (at my door) a couple years ago. As you are aware, the Taylor Morrison Verdin
(McEwen 480) rezoning recently received staff approval from the Desert Village Planning
Commission - with stipulations. As a resident of Tatum Ranch since 2005 and of North
Phoenix since 1977, I know that this area will and can be developed. What I don't understand
is why the portion of the property in the Desert Overlay Character District Area A should be
rezoned to allow additional density near the Cave Creek Wash corridor on the upper 1/3 of
their property. This developer has made some great improvements to their plan since I first
viewed it a couple of years ago and has an amazing rezoning attorney making their case.
Watching and providing constructive input at the DVPC meetings these past couple of years, I
have watched with awe as Susan Demming has been able to create consensus among the
committee by removing walls, tweaking some landscaping elements, adding a butterfly
garden, and consulting with wildlife associations. Creation of walking paths, connectors to
future developments, and paying toward future intersection improvements are all appreciated
but really table stake gestures.
With all the feel-good items, momentum, and rock-star legal representation TM has, it will
take a lot of leadership to reverse this trend and say "enough"!
This property should be developed with the zoning that is in place to preserve the Desert
Character Overlay District and maintain the densities as planned for this part of their parcel.
This rezoning to 2-5 homes per acre along with the Developer's statement that they will have
attached single family, multi-story, and lots as small as 3000 SF. While the averages on their
whole property won't be terrible, there will be some pretty dense development that just doesn't
align with the zoning or the character of the area.
When I think about this property as a first (or second counting Sonoran Gate) in the area, I
worry that this rezoning creates a precedent that can later be used to apply to the other State
Land properties along this corridor. This property is also very much an "island" today. While
it will likely eventually connect to other developments, the connections from that development
today to the State Land will be a web of spider trails and open borders. Inevitably, citizens are
going to cross at Mesquite Wash and Paseo trying to get to the Apache Wash trailhead area.
Page 366
Motorized vehicles are more likely to use this as a place to access the flood control areas and
other areas given the open borders of the planned Verdin community. I can easily see where
posted "no trespassing / State Land" signs are disregarded, and the adjacent flora and fauna
destroyed. We cannot prevent this damage to the desert but having fewer homes will help.
Those that zoned this area knew development would come and gave us a playbook for how it
should look. Maintaining the zoning on the upper portion will send the right message to the
future development plans and prevent those who by right will look for up to 5 homes per acre
while protecting the Cave Creek Wash area that was so thoughtfully included in the Desert
Character Overlay District.
I urge you to please consider this input when you are asked to vote on this request.
Regards,
Rob
Email : rob@totalitsolutions.com
AREA : 602
PHONE : 722-2677
ADDRESS : 29210 N 50th Place
CITY : Cave Creek
STATE : AZ
ZIP : 85331
Submission ID: 1be06d2c527d4b55a11dd07846afa465
Form Submission On : 3/14/2022 4:45:17 PM
Referer: https://phoenix.gov/district2/contact-district-2
This is Not Spam - This message is sent on behalf of the City of Phoenix.
Please handle appropriately.
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: emdist2 - Form Submission
Date: Wednesday, March 16, 2022 8:49:34 AM
Please add to the public record
From: no-reply@phoenix.gov
Date: Wednesday, March 16, 2022 at 8:47 AM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: emdist2 - Form Submission
FROM : Camille proietti
SUBJECT : development Verdin community in N Phoenix near Sonoran Desert Preserve
MESSAGE : If you are at all interested in what your constituents consider important in their
lives, you will pay special attention to the plans for Verdin in N Phoenix. There is absolutely
no excuse to be building/changing the desert character overlay. There are millions of acres
available that would not disrupt such a beautiful area in N Phoenix. Again, there is NO
EXCUSE. It has been shown over and over again, that where cities categorically enhance
resident life with access to nature trails and recreational areas, are considered one of the key
criteria for high desirability. So continuing to take these areas and developing without keeping
this in mind will make Phoenix a LESS DESIRABLE area to live in. And oh, BTW, water,
water, water. Just keep building, because Arizona (specifically Phoenix) has unlimited water
supply.
Email : camillepro1006@aol.com
AREA : 845
PHONE : 6299139
ADDRESS : 29322 N 24 Lane
CITY : Phoenix
STATE : AZ
ZIP : 85085
Submission ID: 353024d685f34e8a8e0d6e5261dd6c14
Form Submission On : 3/16/2022 8:47:31 AM
Referer: https://phoenix.gov/district2/contact-district-2
This is Not Spam - This message is sent on behalf of the City of Phoenix.
Please handle appropriately.
Page 370
From: Cynthia Weiss
To: Jim Waring; council.district2@phoenix.gov
Cc: Julianna Pierre
Subject: Message of support - Verdin Development
Date: Wednesday, March 16, 2022 6:11:19 PM
Attachments: PastedGraphic-1.pdf
Councilman Waring,
As you know, I live in Sonoran Gate, the closest community to the proposed Verdin development that is
currently under review and consideration. Ron and I have lived in this area of North Phoenix over 25 years.
Our family knows all the trails of both North and South Preserves as we are avid hikers and mountain
bikers. We were hiking and biking the primitive trails long before Sonoran Desert Drive was built, and
before much of the land was purchased and preserved by the City of Phoenix.
I must admit when my own community, Sonoran Gate began to form on the desert floor between the North
and South Sonoran Preserves (see below), I was certainly not a fan. I would watch from the top of
Ridgeback on one of my favorite hikes as Sonoran Gate started to take shape, week by week… and again, I
was not happy with what was happening to this pristine pocket of North Phoenix.
Sonoran Gate from Ridgeback mountain, May 21, 2016
Then one evening in 2018, I will never forget, I was scheduled to meet a friend at the Apache Wash
Trailhead for a hike. When I called her to confirm, she told me, “We’re not hiking tonight, come meet me at
the models by the trailhead.”
And so I did. I went home that night with three words for my husband… “Honey, we’re moving.” And that
was it. We’ve been living in Sonoran Gate going on 4 years and we could not be happier.
Once I saw the community of Sonoran Gate with my own two eyes, I changed from a person angry about
the project to one that was eager to volunteer to live in what I consider to be one of the most beautiful
places on Earth. We are truly blessed to be living in Sonoran Gate, and blessed by the people with the vision
and talent that have made that possible.
I appreciate all the planning and civil engineering that allows me to live where I do. I appreciate all my
neighbors in Sonoran Gate, even the scorpions, coyotes and rattlesnakes.
I support this rezoning and the Verdin project beause I can clearly see the thought and care that has gone
into it. I believe there are other families like ours that dream of living within walking distance of hundreds
of miles of preserved hiking and biking trails. The Verdin project will help make that happen for hundreds
of families who call Phoenix home.
If forced to stay at the current “one dwelling per acre zoning,” any home built will be considered estate-
sized and thus only available to the extremely wealthy and/or retired, thus blocking young families with
children from living in the area. That would be a tragedy. To put a little dig on our neighbor city, that would
be “SO North Scottsdale.”
It would be difficult for anyone to thank Taylor Morrison and their team for wanting to develop these 480
Page 371
acres. Any development in the area will mark a time of change many of us are not ready to accept, just as I
was not ready to accept Sonoran Gate as it was being developed.
I do want to thank the City of Phoenix for saving the Sonoran North and South Preserves in the first place.
Things could look much different in the area today, and public access to the now preserved areas would be
much different had poor decisions been made decades ago.
I will thank Taylor Morrison and their team for the thoughtfulness of this plan, especially for NOT
proposing a golf course in this environmentally sensitive area.
Thanks, Councilman Waring, for considering a plan that includes families, children the environment and
community. It’s a good plan, and a uniquely Phoenix plan we can stand behind.
Sincerely,
Cynthia Weiss
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
From: Don Bessler
To: Jim Waring; Julianna Pierre; Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Verdin Development
Date: Tuesday, March 22, 2022 10:44:05 AM
Hello;
I am a resident of Phoenix and live in your Council District near the area currently under
consideration for development "Verdin" (for a Taylor Morrison Community. I am the
President of a firm P3 Systems Management which was created to help entities find the sweet
spot between People - Profit - Planet. In addition, I spent my entire professional
career working for municipalities as a Parks and Public Works Professional. In those roles I
was responsible for the stewardship of significant city infrastructure systems and public
property including sensitive Sonoran habitat. I am familiar with community General Plans,
Resource Management Plans, including programs like Urban forestry Programs, Urban Heat
Planning, Resiliency & Sustainability planning and programming. My wife and I use the
Phoenix Preserve often, including Apache Wash and Sidewinder Trail area. I have seen the
Planning signage up for several years and we assumed that it would become housing.
I wanted to register my support for the project that is being proposed. Given my professional
background, you might imagine that I have seen hundreds of development proposals over my
many years of service; the amount of care and thoughtfulness that has been brought to bear by
the developer and property owner is vastly superior to many that I have seen. Their
understanding of the place and context is solid, their desire to work collaboratively, beyond
meeting minimum requirements is exceptional. As parents of a young working professional,
(graduate of ASU) we are disheartened by the lack of housing ownership options that are
available for first time home buyers. Adding to the housing mix, with reasonable density
residential will only help his prospects. Cities and communities that truly understand
conservation should accept density within scale; environmentally, it certainly beats the
alternative. We are seeing an exodus of our finest and brightest leaving the valley to
communities that have better housing options. I believe that this will become even more
evident over time as remote working becomes a staple of our economic future. Again, as
parents and residents, this would be the worst for us. Being able to live where you grew up
should be a practical option for our young people.
Thank you for taking the time to consider my viewpoint.
Sincerely
don
Donald Bessler, PWLF
President
Page 377
From: Leigh Penny
To: Jim Waring; Council District 2 PCC; Julianna Pierre
Subject: Verdin Project
Date: Tuesday, March 22, 2022 10:42:46 AM
I am a resident of the North Phoenix area and regularly use and benefit from the Sonoran
Preserve. I support the Verdin project. It’s my understanding that the Verdin property is
private property and has been planned for residential development for decades. Although it’s
not part of the City of Phoenix preserve area, the developers have gone to significant lengths
to make sure that Verdin fits in with the surrounding desert context. I support the developer’s
plans for preservation of washes, wildlife corridors and natural open space area. I am excited
by the public trails that will be created and which are a benefit to the entire community. I also
appreciate the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife Federation. The desert is a
beautiful place, and this thoughtful development will allow private property to be developed,
but is also sensitive to its surroundings. Thank you!
Leigh Penny
Page 378
From: Kara Nicholls
To: Jim Waring; Julianna Pierre; Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Verdin Rezoning Request
Date: Wednesday, March 23, 2022 11:26:38 AM
To whom it may concern -
I am writing to show my support for the Taylor Morrison project Verdin. After attending the
public meeting, where I did take the opportunity to speak. I want to reaffirm my support of
the project. Not only do I live near to the north side of the preserve but I am a founding and
current board member of the Desert Foothills Mountain Bike Association (DFMBA) and the
founder of the Cactus Shadows High School Mountain Bike Team. My family has been using
the trails where the preserve is today for over 15 years. The preserve has also been critical to
our efforts to "get more kids on bikes." It is no surprise that one of the things the kids like is
an occasional glimpse of the wildlife whether it be a rattlesnake, a tarantula, a gila monster or
a fox.
As a director of DFMBA, my family has spent countless hours working with the land
managers to ensure access, perform appropriate trail maintenance and educate the mountain
bike community about trail courtesy.
My commitment to preserving open space for the public benefit is shown through my long
commitment and the hands-on work I have done.
However as important as open space is to our community, I am concerned about the lack of
housing available in Maricopa County. As the county rapidly expands it is important for the
government to support available housing by allowing for that housing to be built. It is no
secret that our supply of housing does not meet the demand causing the price of both rents and
housing to become less and less affordable. Local real estate economists, The Cromford
Report and Elliot Pollack, cite lack of Housing as being a key driver in the fast pace of rising
housing prices. Maintaining the zoning to 1 acre per dwelling will not do enough to provide
the area with adequate housing. While I understand this development alone will not alleviate
the housing shortfall on its own, the City of Phoenix has a responsibility to balance the current
need for housing with this minor requests for rezoning to a somewhat higher density.
I understand and support the need to preserve the natural habitat and corridors for wildlife. I
want that for the community and my own friends and family. I believe Taylor Morrsion has
thoughtfully planned the community to allow for both the community to exist alongside the
preserve and wildlife corridors. I am very excited to access the south side of the preserve from
a connected trail with the north.
Sincerely,
--
Kara Nicholls
480 246 1605
Page 379
From: S. Altieri
To: Jim Waring; Council District 2 PCC; Julianna Pierre
Subject: Verdin Development
Date: Thursday, March 24, 2022 10:43:41 AM
Dear Jim Waring and Julianna Pierre,
As a Desert Peak resident, I have researched the proposed, single-family, master-planned
community, Verdin, and am providing a statement of support.
We have resided in the Desert Peak community since 2018. The primary reason we selected this
community is its proximity to the Apache Wash Trailhead and other recreational areas that are
within a short drive from home. We use the trails most weekends, volunteer as City of Phoenix Park
Stewards, and we have become loyal customers of the businesses that require traveling to and
through the scenic areas that surround Desert Peak, allowing us to enjoy a beautiful, desert drive
while running errands. We could not imagine living in any other community in the Phoenix
Metropolitan Area…until we learned about Verdin.
The area surrounding Desert Peak has changed dramatically since 2018, and with the rapid and
ongoing population growth and increasing number of employment opportunities nearby, there is a
need to offer housing options to support the growth. For the Valley to continue to be a destination
for homeowners and employers, challenges with limited housing options will need to be addressed.
When we moved to the area, we recognized that changes would occur. Verdin will not only lend to
providing housing options, but as a homeowner to future communities that will become neighbors
to Desert Peak, I welcome a neighboring development like Verdin that celebrates the characteristics
of the desert environment. Verdin intends to integrate public trail corridors, view corridors, paseos
and edge open area spaces. The approach to the development incorporates sensitivity to the native
plants, wildlife, landforms and climate. Over seven miles of community paths and trails will
encourage community members and visitors to enjoy the outdoors and cherish the desert
environment as part of their daily lives. Plans for the development also include following design
guidelines for Verdin to become a National Wildlife Federation Certified Community. As an individual
with heightened interest in wildlife protection, this is among the most admirable of the features of
Verdin.
Although we love our Desert Peak community and have no intentions of moving, as homeowners,
we are now envisioning a future community that aligns precisely with the values that we uphold.
Verdin celebrates all that we appreciate about the area and look forward to seeing this development
progress to completion.
Warm Regards,
Sara Altieri
Page 380
From: David George
To: Jim Waring; Council District 2 PCC; Julianna Pierre
Subject: Verdin
Date: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 11:47:29 AM
Please accept this letter as a statement of support for Taylor Morrison’s Verdin project along
Sonoran Desert Drive.
I live in the Sonoran Gate community, which was also built by Taylor Morrison and is the closest
residential subdivision to the Verdin project. I have met with the development team to learn about
the project. I welcome another Taylor Morrison community to the area as I have enjoyed my home
and community. Additionally, although Taylor Morrison is proposing additional homes in the area,
they are also proposing significant roadway investments that benefit the larger community.
I would like to see the Verdin project approved as I know from personal experience the quality that
Taylor Morrison will bring with this development and the associated roadway improvements. Please
distributed this email to the members of the North Gateway Village and Desert View Village.
Thank you,
David George
31311 N 1st Place
Phoenix AZ 85085
Electronic File Disclaimer: This e-mail and any attachments may contain privileged and
confidential information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this
correspondence in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and permanently
delete this message and any attachments from your computer.
Page 381
Page 382
From: Jane penny
To: Julianna Pierre; Council District 2 PCC; Jim Waring
Subject: Verdin project
Date: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 10:40:13 AM
We are writing this letter to voice our support for the new Taylor Morrison project on Sonoran Parkway.
We live in the Sonoran Gate Community, also built by Taylor Morrison and the closest subdivision to the Verdin
project. We love our home and our community, and we are impressed with the thoughtful treatment of the desert
surroundings. After looking at the proposed project we feel Verdin will set the bar for any future development in
our beautiful desert.
Bill and Jane Penny
Sent from my iPad
Page 383
From: Vashti Supplee
To: Steve Bowser; Julianna Pierre
Subject: Verdin Project
Date: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 10:08:07 AM
Hello Steve and Julianna-
I am writing as myself and I am not representing any entity. I have been keenly interested in
public trail connectivity for the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve north and south of Sonoran Desert
Parkway. I have had the opportunity to meet with Alex Stedman, planner for the Verdin
project. I made some suggestions to improve the project in terms of edge protections on the
east adjacent to Cave Creek Wash and public access. The Verdin team has largely adopted
these suggestions
I am unable to attend the upcoming Village Planning meeting on April 4th and I have the
following comments for the record.
The Verdin project team has been very responsive to suggestions that will contribute to the
desert character of the development, including a 25 foot natural area buffer on the east edge of
the property adjacent to Cave Creek. There will be public access along Mesquite Wash and
through the pedestrian Paseos to Phoenix Sonoran Preserve and Cave Buttes Recreation Area
land.
I support the following stipulations as part of PUD approval:
STIP #1: Public trail access easements, as approved by the City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation
Department, shall be provided for the Mesquite Wash Corridor Trail, and the Community Paseo
Paths that provide a connection to future trail connections to the Sonoran Preserve as identified
on the Verdin Pedestrian Circulation plan dated June 3, 2019 included within the Verdin PUD, to
ensure permanent public access through the Verdin community to the Sonoran Preserve. The
public access shall be designed in a way to restrict unauthorized motor vehicle access, as
approved by Parks. The specific location, design and timing of construction of the public trail
connections shall be coordinated with and approved by the Parks and Recreation Department.
STIP #2: A minimum 25 foot open space tract shall be provided along the eastern boundary of
the Verdin property to provide a transition to the Cave Creek Wash corridor. The open space
tract shall be considered a Certified Area Type “B” – Natural Revegetated Area with plant
material from the Approved Plant List: Green List.
Yours in Conservation,
Vashti "Tice" Supplee
918 W. Roosevelt Street
Phoenix, AZ 85007
vsupplee25@gmail.com
Page 384
Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: April 5 Desert View Village Planning Committee
From:Wiele,Larry
Sent:Thursday,March31,20222:38PM
To:AnthonyMGrande
Subject:April5DesertViewVillagePlanningCommittee
Anthony
IamaresidentoftheSonoranFoothillsdevelopment,locatedjusttothewestoftheareathatisbeingproposedfor
rezoningandchangestotherequirementsthatwouldberequiredfordevelopment.
WhileIunderstandthatthisareaisprivatelyowned,andissubjecttodevelopment,Iwanttoencourageyoutonot
changethezoningrequirementsorreducethedesertcharacterthathasbeenintendedforthisarea.These
requirementshavebeeninplaceformanyyears,andtheownersofthelandhavebeenawareofthese
requirements.Theserequirementsareforthegoodofthecommunityasthewhole,whilereducingtheserequirements
benefitsonlytheownersofthisland,andinfactincreasingthenumberofhomesinthisareawillhaveanegativeimpact
onthecurrentresidentsinthisarea.
IrequesttheDesertViewPlanningCommitteemembersvoteagainsttheitemsontheApril5PlanningCommittee
Agenda.
LarryWiele
2413WHorsetailTrail
Phoenix,AZ85085
Page 385
From: James G. Gaston II
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Council District 2 PCC; jim@jimwaring.com; Joshua Bednarek; Julianna Pierre
Subject: Verdin/McEwan 480 Project
Date: Friday, April 1, 2022 2:47:24 PM
As a local resident, I am against any realignment/zoning amendment of Phoenix’s Master Plan
for the Sonoran Preserve as it relates to Taylor Morrison’s request for the Verdin/McEwan 480
Project, Z-62-18-2. Key objection elements of the amendment include:
1. Remove the Desert Character Overlay requirement
2. Build homes outside of existing infrastructure
3. Massive up zone, 3–5 houses per acre
The developer is seeking to transform the Desert Character Overlay around the Preserve.
Moving it north of Sonoran Desert Drive is actually removing it because north of Sonoran
Desert Drive is the Preserve itself.
Regardless of previous statements, if all Plan Amendments proposed are passed, the
development will not be “truly unique.” Nor will it be as the developer committed, “ . . . a
context-sensitive community that sets the bar high for any future development in the area.”
It seems all the developer sees is growth, not thoughtful development, or sustainability. This
Plan Amendment only benefits the developer and not the community or the Preserve.
I am not a “recreational activist,” as cited on a recent local newscast. My objections seek to:
a. Maintain the Master Plan as originally proposed
b. Recognize the dismal condition of the Valley’s current and future water supply
c. Maintain the overlay as the effective way to control development in the entire Preserve
area
James Gaston
Cave Creek, Arizona
Page 386
From: Anthony M Grande
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Taylor Morrison Development North Gateway, Sonoran Preserve
Date: Friday, April 1, 2022 5:19:55 PM
Anthony Grande
Planner II – Village Planner
Planning & Development Department
Long Range Planning
Office: 602-256-5648
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
-----Original Message-----
From: Jill Hoffman
Sent: Friday, April 1, 2022 4:55 PM
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Cc: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Taylor Morrison Development North Gateway, Sonoran Preserve
I was saddened to hear of the committee vote of 4-1 to allow all of Taylor Morrison’s requests in changing the
zoning and the North Gateway overlay previously planned. I was hoping that the density would not change, but at
the very least they would keep the desert character overlay that all the other neighborhoods in the area adhere to, per
city of Phoenix. I’m also very worried about the infrastructure in place now, will not support any more population,
not to mention the lack of schools in the area. My youngest will finish high school next year, but the overcrowding
in our schools in the North Gateway neighborhoods is horrible. We are not sending our kids to Barry Goldwater
because there is “room", and I assure you Boulder Creek does not have the room for the added population. That
school has a hard enough time getting teachers to drive so far north for the students they have now. The approval of
all things building, is not making an ideal neighborhood. The fact that 7 new apartment complexes are coming to
North Gateway, 5 of them in one area, proves you are not looking out for the interests of the current residents.
Schools and roads are not in place. These builders need to pay for the upgraded infrastructure and schools, just like
50% Norterra Canyon was paid for by the builder. Sonoran Foothills School came 8 years after promised, and has
been over capacity since the 3rd year it was open. The saddest part, is you are allowing a desert jewel you have been
entrusted with, to turn into urban sprawl. Along the I-17 corridor is where building was planned 30+ years ago, not
Phoenix’s beautiful Sonoran Preserve. We can never get it back. It takes a strong person to stand up for the land, be
that person for the generations to come.
Jill Hoffman
North Gateway resident since 2005
Page 387
From: Christine M Pedersen
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Save Our Sonoran Preserve - Rezone Proposal
Date: Monday, April 4, 2022 3:17:08 PM
Good Afternoon Julianna,
Please see below.
Thank you,
Christine
From: Sonoran Preserve
Sent: Saturday, April 2, 2022 1:28:02 PM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Save Our Sonoran Preserve - Rezone Proposal
Dear Councilmember Waring,
Recently I wrote to you about a test mailing Save Our Sonoran Preserve was doing to gage public
support for retaining the Desert Character Overlay District. The mailing was made to a sampling of
400 of the nearly 12,000 voters living near the Preserve. The test area is highlighted green in the
map posted at: https://app.box.com/s/bnui5b5w5ufyqidem2mmwfg0jofh1c6f [app.box.com].
I am pleased to report that the test mailing is showing an unusually high degree of deeply felt
support for the Sonoran Preserve among nearby voters.
We mailed the letter at the following link to 400 registered voters, half of which were Republican
and half Democrat: https://app.box.com/s/3wp1f022c56vu1j566ph0kdcmcbztdh8 [app.box.com].
The mailing to 400 voters has thus far generated 118 signatures of the petition
at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/sonorapreserve [surveymonkey.com].
A map showing the location where supporters live is
at: https://app.box.com/s/t0am8a0717ksk0o1sdalrgdc19zhlcdk [app.box.com]. As you’ll see support
is coming from voters living up to four miles from the Sonoran Preserve. And support is about equal
from Republicans and Democrats.
Nearly all of the petition signers provided the reasons for why they want the Sonoran Preserve
safeguards of the Desert Character Overlay District retained. These reasons can be viewed
at: https://app.box.com/s/405n9bnddchkl92qj29j1x1m0yx8xhun [app.box.com].
We anticipate that this test mailing will eventually result in a total of 150- to 200-petition signers.
Suffice to say, this test indicates a high degree of support among area voters for your efforts to
Page 388
safeguard the Sonoran Preserve. I suspect though that supporters may be open to modifying the
areas in the bottom 2/3 of the Verdin property while keeping Desert Character Overlay in the top
1/3 so as to create a win-win compromise for both parties.
We are now planning a second survey mailing to 6,000 of the 12,000 nearby voters. Once we have
these results we will again share our results with you. Thank you again for working and meeting with
us this important issue.
Respectfully,
Dr. Gary Kirkilas
Save Our Sonoran Preserve
708-369-4566
*******
Page 389
Page 390
SAVE OUR SONORAN PRESERVE
Dr. Gary Kirkilas, Chair (708) 369-4566
21001 N Tatum Blvd STE 1630-238 saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com
Phoenix, Arizona 85050 supportpubliclands.com/arizona/save-our-sonoran-preserve
March 8, 2022
«FirstName» «LastName»
«Address»
«City», Arizona «Zip»
Dear «MrMs» «LastName»:
I understand that you, like me, live in the vicinity of the Sonoran
Desert Preserve shown in the map on the other side of this letter. I
assume that you, like me, treasure living near this fantastic natural area
and the opportunities afforded for hiking, biking, or just a pleasant drive
along Sonoran Desert Drive. If this is true then please consider signing
the petition at the following address: ceds.org/sosp or scan the QR code
to the right with your phone or tablet camera then tap open
‘surveymonkey.com’. Every signature we get goes a long way.
At issue is a proposal to double or triple the number of housing units that can be built on
the Verdin site (see map). Development in this area is guided by the Desert Character Overlay
District which allows growth but with a number of measures to safeguard those Sonoran Desert
Preserve values we treasure.
The Verdin development company has asked the Phoenix City Council to ignore the
Desert Character Overlay District. If granted, Sonoran Desert Drive traffic volume could go
from 8,300- to more than 20,000-trips/day from this one development. Other potential growth
along this corridor could raise Sonoran Desert Drive traffic to nearly 50,000 trips/day or more!
Sonoran Desert Drive traffic volume is already at a point where additional bike safety
measures are needed. While there are proposals to add these measures, there is a point where
traffic volume becomes so great that cycling or just walking is no longer enjoyable.
Doubling to tripling the number of nearby homes would detract from the true wilderness
essence of the Preserve. Additionally, abandoning the Desert Character Overlay District is like
turning our back on the beloved Sonoran Preserve - eliminating the protections that were
thoughtfully placed to maintain the uniqueness and beauty as well as ensure maximum
conservation of the incredible ecosystems while allowing a reasonable amount of development.
It is for these reasons that I ask you to sign the Save Our Sonoran Preserve petition
urging Jim Waring and other Phoenix City Council members to require that Verdin and other
development fully comply with the Desert Character Overlay District safeguards.
Over, pleaseÆ
Page 391
Please contact me at saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com or (708) 369-4566 if you have
any questions.
Sincerely,
Dr. Gary Kirkilas, Chair
Page 392
Page 393
Reasons Provided By Phoenix Residents for Why They Signed the
Save Our Sonoran Preserve Petition at:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/sonorapreserve
WeneedtodoeverythingwecantoprotecttheSonoranDesertPreserve.Thereshouldn’tbelotsofhomes
there.We’vealreadytakensomuchofthenaturalhabitatanddevelopedit.Weneedtoleavelargechunks
alonesothatthoseanimalsthatliveinthedeserthaveaplace.Ilovehavingthewildernessnearbyand
untouched.Increasingthenumberofhomesnearthepreserveisaskingfortroubleanddisplacingsomanyof
thedesertanimals.Iboughtoutheretobeclosetonaturenottobringthedowntowntraffichere.
Trafficonthepreserveroadisalreadyquitebusyduringrushhour.Addingmorehomeswillincreasethedanger
oftheroadanddamagethebeautifuldesert.
IlovedrivingontheSonoraDesertDr.andseeingourbeautifuldesert.Iandmyfamilymembersalsoenjoy
hikingandbikingonthetrails.
Ihavelivedinthisareaforover16yearsandamanativeArizonan.TheCityhasdoneawonderfuljobon
SonoranDesertDrive,intermsofincorporatingareastorecreateandenjoytheunbelievabledesertscenery
withintheSonoranPreserve.Ihavehikedtheareaandmarvelatthebeauty.Increasingtheplannedhousing
unitsbymultiplesoftwoorthreewillsignificantlydetractfromthearea'sbeautyandtranquilityandaddan
unsustainableamountoftrafficandintroduceecologicaldamagetothearea.Thereisareasonsomuchland
wasdesignatedasapreserveallthoseyearsago.Itshouldstaythatway.
ThePhoenixSonoranPreserveisoneofthefinestusesoftaxpayerdollars.Theabilitytohikeandmountainbike
onmilesandmilesoftrailsisoneofmyfavoritepartsoflivinginNorthPhoenix.Wearealreadyinundatedwith
apartmentcomplexesandhomedevelopmentswithplentyofinventory.Plus,thereisplentyoflandavailable
fordeveloperstobuildonthatwon’twreckoneofthebestthingsthattheCityofPhoenixhasdoneinthepast
coupledecades.
Theinfrastructureisnotsetupforadevelopmentofthissizeandthetaxpayersshouldn’tbearthecostto
Idrivethisroadregularlyandit’salreadygettingoverpopulatedwithtrafficwiththecurrentdevelopment.
MorehousingandconstructionwilltakeawaythenaturalbeautyoftheSonorandesertpreserveandwillalso
increaseunwantedtraffic.
Weliveinthearea,havehikedthesetrails,ourtwoboysattendednearbyCCUSDHorseshoeTrailselementary
school,andI’dsaythatingeneralwehaveastrongdesiretoactasgoodstewardsofthislandandtherefore
haveavestedinterestinmaintainingthebeautyoftheSonorandesertpreserveandourbalancewithnature.
Thiscityisgrowingsofast&weneedtopreservesomeofthebeautifuldesertlandscape.Ifwekeepbuilding
morehouses,wewillhavenothingleft.Wedon’tneedmorehouses!!
Wedonotwantthisnewdevelopmentbecausewelovethenaturaldesertwechosetolivenear.Inaddition,we
doneedtheexcessiveamountoftrafficthatsuchadevelopmentwouldcause.
AsaresidentofanearbycommunityIamconcernedthatthetrafficthatwillbegeneratedbytheproposed
Verdincommunitywillpresentmanysafetyconcerns.ThePreserveprovidesatranquilenvironmentthatwill
mostlikelychangedramaticallyincharacterifthisdenselypopulatedcommunityisbuilt.Idon’tmindsome
buildingalongtheroutebutonlyifitisnotpopulatedasdenselyassomeofthesurroundingdevelopments.
Ourhousebacksuptothedesert.Weboughtthathousebecauseitbacksuptothedesert,Iwanttotokeepour
viewandourslowersimplelifestylethereandnotturnitsintoabigcityfeel.
Wouldcauseanoverpopulatedareathatismeanttobepreservedfornature.Wouldruinhikingandbikingdoto
theamountoftrafficandwouldbecomedangerous.Wouldeffecttheviewsandtheabilityforpeopleenjoythe
scenery.Wouldalsoeffectthewildlifepushingthecoyotesandjavelinasintoresidentialareas.Whichthey
belonginthedesert.
Thiswouldcausepollutiondustnoiseandwouldbeharmfultoourhealth
Page 394
Thereisnoneedforadditionalhousinginourareaspecificallysonearaprotectedpreserve.Thereisnotenough
watersosupporttheadditionalhomesandbusinessesthatcomewithadevelopmentsuchasthis.
Naturalbeautyalongwithreducednoise,trafficandnightlights.
WeliveintheSonoranGatecommunity.I’malsoacyclist.Wemovedheretoescapecongestionandenjoythe
outdoors.Allofthatisthreatenedwiththiscurrentbuildingfrenzy.Whywouldweabandontheexpresspurpose
ofthesePreserves,socarefullyplannedanduniquelyexecuted?!Andwherearewefindingasustainablewater
supplyforthisunbridleddevelopment?Thisismadness.
Nowantinganymorehomedelveloperstearingupthepreserves.WiththeadditionalVerizonzonesitethere
willbetomanydangerousEMF’sinthecommunity
ThebeautyoftheSonoranPreservewillbereplacedwithurbanarea????Duringthehikeorbikeridearewe
supposedtoadmirethehouses???
TjhisisthelaststripofSonoranDesertleftinPhoenix.I'msorrythepreservedoesn'tborderDoveValley.Whats
doneisgonedonotmakeitworseby3Xthenumberofpeople
Noneedformoredevelopmenteatingupourdesert.
IamveryconcernedabouttheadditionaltrafficvolumethatwillbearesultoflargeVerdincommunity.Iama
triathletewhousesSonoranDesertDr.dailyfortrainingandwiththeincreasedtrafficIfearformysafety.In
addition,wemovedtothisarea(85085)forthebeautyofthedesert.AbandoningtheDesertCharacterOverlay
Districtwilleliminatetheprotectionsthatwereplacedtoensureconservationoftheecosystemsinthearea
whilestillallowingforsomedevelopment.ThelargenumberofhomestheVerdindevelopmentcompany
proposestosqueezeintothisareawilldetractfromthewildernessandbeautyofthePreserve.Yet,another
areaofconcernwouldbetheovercrowdingofschoolsintheDeerValleySchooldistrict.
Weneedtoprotectourbeautifuldesert.Therearemanyotherareastobuildonsowecanallappreciatethe
scenery.Afterallthisiswhywelivehere.
Keepingsomesemblanceofthedesertlifestyleiswhywemovedhere.Donotignorethesafeguards.Reducethe
numberofhousingunits.Whydoyouwanttodobusinesswithacompanywhichclearlydoesnotrespect
nature,butonlytheeconomicbottomlineͲ$
Enjoybicyclingthroughthepreserve.Theroadistoonarrowforthetrafficalreadyusingtheparkway.
ThiszoningwouldbeuncharacteristicoftheSonoranpreserveandcityparksurroundingthesite.
ItravelSonoranDesertDriveeverydaybecauseIliverightoffofit.Itisabeautifuldrive,butalsoonethatis
verysereneandpeaceful.IamconcernedthatallowingtheVerdincommunitytobebuiltattherequested
densityitwillcauseagreatimpactandstresstothedrivethroughthePreserve.Eveniftheroadisexpandedto
morelanes,thisroadwillbecomeadangerousrouteforthebikersandhikersinthearea,nottomentionthe
drivers.Pleasedonotallowthedensityforthisnewcommunityasrequested!
Weneedmoreopenspaceandalreadyhaveenoughhomes!
Weselectedthisareatolive,inpart,basedonthefeelingofbeingclosertonature.TheSonoranPreserveplayed
abigpartinthatfeeling.ThelossofanyPreserveopenspaceortheincreaseintrafficthruthePreservewill
diminishthatfeeling.Pleaserequirealldeveloperstocomplywithexistingdeveloprestrictionsanddonot
"lessen"thoserestrictions.ͲThankyou...
Ihavelivedinthisareafortwentyyearsanditisgettingsocrowdedandoverbuilt.Wemustpreserveopen
outdoorspaceforpeopletoenjoythepeaceofthedesertandrecreationareasthatareourArizonatreasures
ThebeautyofthisPreserveareashouldbePRESERVED.ThereisareasonwhytheDCODexists.
Trafficcongestion,pedestrianandbicyclesafety.Preservingthisareafromdevelopment,asenvisionedbythe
DesertCharacterOverlayDistrict.
Toomuchhousingbuildout,let'sslowitdown
Toomuchhousingbuildout,needtoslowdownalittle
Iwanttoprotectthewildernessandessenceofthepreserve.Ithoughtthislandwasprotectedfromfuture
housingdevelopment
Page 395
Thisareaisimportanttousaswehikeandbike.Knowingthatpreservewillalwaysbeheremadebuyingour
homeeasy.Wewouldlikeforalldevelopmenttomindandtakecareofourdesertspaces.Thereisareasonthe
DesertCharacterOverlayDistrictwascreated.Toignorethiswouldbeatragedy.
ItisveryimportanttoretainournaturaldesertandtheSonoranPreserve.
Wespecificallymovedtothisareab/cofthepreserveandthepeacefulnessthatitbringstoourlivesand
neighborhood.Districtguidelinesareinplaceforareasonandshouldnotbeadjustedforagreedydeveloper.
Thisismyneighborhood..Ilivehere.Ihikethesebeautifultrailsfivetimesaweek.Thereareplentyofacresof
desertinotherareas.Peoplecomefromalloverthevalleytohikeandbikehere.Thislandhasbeensetasidefor
thisandshouldnotbetakenaway.
Thegrowthinthisareaisalreadyatanalltimehigh.ThissmallareaofdesertPRESERVEiswhymanyofus
movedtothearea.ThePRESERVEisusedbyhikersandbikersasabeautifulgetawaythatisinourbackyard.
Everyotherinchhasalreadybeendevelopedbyapartmentcomplexes.Enough!!LeaveourPRESERVEalone!!
IlivearoundthecornerinSonoranFoothillscommunityandoneofthereasonswemovedherewastobeable
tobikeonDoveValleyandSonoranDesert,aswetrainforTriathlonsyearround.Everycaryouaddtothese
roadsmakesthismoredangerousforus.IhavealmostbeenhittwicebycarscomingoutofSonoranGate
community.Theproposeddevelopmentofover1400homeswilldestroythisveryspecialarea.
Trafficismymainissue.AsaSonoranbikerouteitisbecomingmoreandmoredangerousforbikers.School
trafficonmainroadsandthroughneighborhoodsalsohasbecomemoredangerous.Wildernesscanneverbe
recapturedoncehomesarebuiltsowehaveaonceinalifetimedutytosavelandforconservationandwildlife.
asathirdgenerationnativezoney,Ihaveseentoomuchofourbeautifuldesertturnedovertodevelopers.We
mustpreservetheveryassetthatdrawssomanytomovetoourwonderfulstateͲfindabetterbalancebetween
growthandpreservation.IrecentlymovedtoahomeinSonoranFoothillstoenjoythisbeautifularea.Please
donotallowthegreedofdevelopersoverbuildourdesert.
Iabsolutelylovethebeautyofthedesertandtheopportunitywehavetogetoutinthepreservetohike,run
andbike.Iamanavidtrailrunnerandhikerandwouldbedevastatedifwelosethatabilityjusttomakewayfor
morehouses.
IliveinSonoranGate.IhikeApacheTrail.
Ilovehikinginthepreserve.Anyonewhointendsonbuildinganywhereclosetoitneedstofollowtherules.
Ourdesertisatrisk.Weneedyoutoprotectitbyrequiringthebuildertodotherightthing.
Imovedherein2007tobenearthisgreatpreserveandtoliveI.Aquietcommunity.Addingthismuchhousing
developmentswillforeverimpactthisnaturalenvironment
It’simperativetopreserveandprotectthewildlifeandtheirnaturalhabitat.Thisareaisalreadyexplodingwith
growth&traffic.
Thereasonwemovedherewasthebeautyandtranquilityofthedesert.Wewerenotawareoftheproposed
‘citylike’communityVerdinwishestobuild.
TheSonoranDesertDriveisabeautifulnaturalareathatneedstobepreservedforfuturegenerations.Thereare
plentyofotherplacestodevelopclosertotheIͲ17
TheSonoranPreservealongSonoranDesertDriveallowsuscloseappreciationofthescenicdesertandits
thrivingecosystem.Otherpartsofthevalleyarebetterequippedforgrowthandinfill.Weneedtoembrace
densitywherethecityismorepreparedtosupportit.Thispatchworksprawlintotheouterreachesofthedesert
chopsuptheexpanseofhabitatunnecessarily.Ifitcontinues,wecanonlylookforwardtosmallpatchesof
desertbrushbetweenhomesasopposedtomilesofouruniquedesertthatwecanallenjoy.
Therehasbeenenoughdevelopmentinthisarea.Stopcrowdingoutthewildlife.
Thisareaneedstobepreservedasoriginallydesignedinorderforthemembersofthiscommunitytoenjoya
placetogetawayfromalltheoverdevelopment.
Page 396
Wemoveduptothisareatoenjoythebeautyandtranquilityofthearea.Nowitisbeingthreatened.Wemoved
uptothisareatoseeourbeautifuldessertinitsnaturalhabit,andnowit'sbeingthreatened.Wemoveduphere
becauseitwasagreatdreamcometrue,andnowthatdreamisagainbeingthreatenedbythosewishingto
makemanydollarsoffthelandandenvironmentthatbelongstousall.Please,pleaselet'sstopthistravesty.
Thanksforreadingmyinput.Wejustsoloveituphereandhopefornomoregrowthanddevelopment.
WithalltheapartmentsbeingbuiltonthewestendbetweenDoveValley&SonoranDesertDrive,thetrafficwill
becomejustlikethecitystreets—noisyandcongested.Verdinproposingadditionalhomeswillmakeitthat
muchworse.Inaddition,wemovedtothisareabecauseoftheSonoronDesertPreservewhichisbecomingnon
Conservationwillprotectthewildlife.Drivingthemoutoftheirnaturalhabitatcouldputsomeanimalsatriskof
extinction.Thereareotherdesertareas/landthatcouldbebuilton.Preservingwillhelpreduceourfootprintand
helpreducetrafficandpollution.
EverywherenearSonoranpreserveanddesertdriveconstructionsarehappening,it’saverybeautifulhikeplace
toenjoyqualitytimewithfamilyandfriends,asaneighborhoodresidentIwouldliketokeepitbeautifulandnot
havehomesafterhomesgettingbuiltthere…therearehardlyanycommunityparkgettingbuiltinthearea..
Iamanavidhiker.Ienjoybeingabletoseenature,plantsandanimals.Wearealreadytakingsomuchnatural
habitatfromdesertlife.Overcrowdingthepreserveareaincreasespollutionbyhumansandtheirmachines.
Furthermore,lightandnoisepollutioncreateadditionalissues.Pleaseconserveourpreserve.
Iamanavidhiker.Ienjoybeingabletoseenature,plantsandanimals.Wearealreadytakingsomuchnatural
habitatfromdesertlife.Overcrowdingthepreserveareaincreasespollutionbyhumansandtheirmachines.
Furthermore,lightandnoisepollutioncreateadditionalissues.Pleaseconserveourpreserve.
IfrequentlyrecreateintheareaͲitisfrequentedbyalotofpeople.Bothontheroadwithlimitedtrafficandon
thetrails.ItwouldbedetrimentaltothefoundationofthePhoenixPreservestotakeawaylanddedicatedto
openspaceandlettingdeveloperstearitapart.Developerscangetlandfurtheroutontheoutskirtsoftownto
developͲnotareasalreadydedicatedasopenspaceforalltorecreatenowandfuturegenerations.
Ihikethruthepreservealmosteveryday.Itisabeautifulandpeacefulareaamidthecity.Losingthisareato
Koreahousingwouldbeawful.Thereissomuchdevelopmenteverywheresothesespecialareasarebecoming
allthemoreimportanttospareornotoverdevelop.Onceitisgoneitcannotbereplaced.Pleasedon'tletthis
wonderfulareaberuinedbymoreoverdevelopment!
Itisaverypeacefulplacetohike.Myfamilygoestherefrequently.ThebeautyofSonoranDesertDrisso
beautifulitshouldnotbedisturbed.
It’svitaltokeepthepreservenaturalanduntouchedfortheuseofhikingandsupportingoutdooractivities.
Withouttheregulationsinplacetherewouldbenopreservetouseandadmire.Theanimalsinthepreserve
wouldbegreatlyaffectedbyalargerpopulationcrowdingthem.
it'sanaturaltreasurethatisspecialandneedstobeprotected.
LivingbythebeautifulSonoranMountainPreserveareaandSonoranDesertDrive,allowspeopletointeract
positivelywithnatureandtheenvironment.Thisisnecessaryforpeople’sphysicalandmentalwellbeing,which
weallrediscoveredduringthepandemicwhenitwasoneofthefewthingspeoplewereallowedtodo.The
MountainPreserveallowspeopletoconnectwithnatureandenjoythepeacefuloutdoorenvironment.The
peopleinthearealovetheopenspacesandserenitythattheSonoranDesertMountanPreserveprovides.They
walk,bikeorhikeintheneighborhoodeveryday.Ifthesedevelopersareallowedtooverdevelopthisbeautiful
areaitwillbeadetrimenttothealreadyestablishedneighborhoodsbyincreasedpopulationthroughclustered
housing,traffic,safety,noiselevels,overcrowdedschools,andahostofotherissues.Thismountainpreserveis
vitaltothewellbeingandsafetyofpeoplewhochosetoliveforhereforabetterqualityoflife.Pleasedon’t
allowthesedeveloperstodestroytheMountainPreserve.Thankyou
Maintaindesertpreserve,congestion,qualityoflife,saferplacetoenjoydesertwithexercise.
MyfamilyandIlovehikingintheSonoranPreserve.It’showwespendourweekends.Wewouldhatetolose
anymoreoftheland,theatmosphere,theanimals.Pleasesavetheland.Thankyou
Page 397
MyhusbandandImovedintotheareaspecificallyforthetrailsandwildernessoftheSonoranPreserve.Wehike
thetrailsatleasttwiceaweekwithourdogs.Pleasedonotallowmoreencroachmentjustforthesakeof
makingmoremoney!Iamaretiredregisterednurseandservedtheindigentpopulationsandcan'taffordto
moveagain.Pleasestopthis!
Myselfandsomanyofmyneighborsandfriendshikethisareaonaregularbasis!Thereisanestthatanowl
comesbacktoeveryyear!Therearebeautifulfeesoftheamazingareainwhichsomanyofuscallhome!Please
don’tdestroyanareaweloveandcherish
Needtopreserveasmuchofourbeautifulmountainsaspossible
OurfamilyenjoysthescenicdrivedownSonoranDesertDrive.I’msaddenedtoheartheyalreadyhaveplansto
developsomeofthatland.ThedessertlandscapeandeasyaccesstotrailsfromFiresideareuniquetolivingin
NorterraandIwouldhatetoseethatchange.It’salreadybecomingovercrowdeduphereandtrafficiseffected.
Pleaseconsiderpreservingourbeautifuldesertlandscape.
Ourwildlifeisbeingdisplacedandsoonwillnothaveaplacetolive.Peoplewantthemkilledastheyareafraidof
them!WewillliveinadenserareaanditwillsoonfeellikeNYCity!Wemustfindabalanceforall.
QualityofLifewillbedestroyed!Letusstartwithhabitatdestruction.Thenlet'sdiscussthewatershortage.
September2021,itwasreportedthattheBureauofReclamationhasdeclaredawatershortageontheColorado
River,whichmeansthatArizona,alongwithNevadaandMexico,willgetlesswaterthannormalby2022.Ifwe
continuetodestroyourdesertwithunnecessarydevelopmentforthesakeofthealmightydollarthenwemight
aswellliftallrestrictions.Whenwillitend?Whenisenoughgrowthenough?MaricopaCountywasthenumber
onecountyinthenationforgrowthinthepastyear.Thisneedstostop!Wearedestroyingourhumanhabitat
byallowingthesedeveloperstobullytheirwayintotheseareas.Nowlet'sdiscusssafety?LookatourPolice
Deptorlackthereof.Wecan'tsustainthisridiculousgrowth.Pleasedowhatyoucantohelppreserveour
beautifulSonoranPreserve!
QualityofLifewillbedestroyed!Letusstartwithhabitatdestruction.Thenlet'sdiscussthewatershortage.
September2021,itwasreportedthattheBureauofReclamationhasdeclaredawatershortageontheColorado
River,whichmeansthatArizona,alongwithNevadaandMexico,willgetlesswaterthannormalby2022.Ifwe
continuetodestroyourdesertwithunnecessarydevelopmentforthesakeofthealmightydollarthenwemight
aswellliftallrestrictions.Whenwillitend?Whenisenoughgrowthenough?MaricopaCountywasthenumber
onecountyinthenationforgrowthinthepastyear.Thisneedstostop!Wearedestroyingourhumanhabitat
byallowingthesedeveloperstobullytheirwayintotheseareas.Nowlet'sdiscusssafety?LookatourPolice
Deptorlackthereof.Wecan'tsustainthisridiculousgrowth.Pleasedowhatyoucantohelppreserveour
beautifulSonoranPreserve!
Somanyanimalswillgetdisplacedfromtherenaturalhabitats.
TheDonoranapreserveisapeacefulareausedbymanypeopleforhiking,mountainbikingandhorseback
riding.Addingmorehouseswillincreasethenumberofpeopleusingthetrailsaswellascreatemoretrafficin
ThepreservegivesushikingtrailsandallowseveryonetoenjoythebeautyoftheArizonadesertandwildlife.It
wouldalsodramaticallydecreasepropertyvaluesforthepeoplevotingforyoutoremaininoffice.
Thisareaisgreatlyusedforhiking,biking,trailrunning,andoutdoorrecreationalactivities.Wedonotwant
overdevelopmenttoruinthenaturalaesthetics,significantlyincreasenoise,orpollutionthatwoulddegradethe
valueofthetrueremainingwildernessintheSonoranDesertPreserve.Pleaseseektoenforceandupholdthe
DesertCharacterOverlayDistricttowardtheVerdinprojectandothersubsequentproposals.
Thisisabeautifulandvibrantpartofourcommunity.Don’tdestroyitbyaddingadditionalresidential
development.Oncethosehousesgetinthere,theyaregoingtobecomplainingandadvocatingforcommercial
developmentbecausetheydon’twanttodrive20minutestoshopsandrestaurants.Beforeweknowit,allof
thepreservewillbegone.Thehikingtrails,thenature,andtheareaispristine.
Page 398
ThisisadesignatedDesertSonoranPreserve.Theestablishedtrailsareusedbythousandsandthepreserve
hostshabitatforArizonawildlifeincludingjavelina,bobcat,coyote,raccoon,groundsquirrelandmanymore.
ThereareavarietyofbirdandreptilespeciesGilaMonster,greathornedowl,roadrunner,gamblesquail,Inca
dove,Cardinals,spottedwhiptailandchuckwallalizardstomentionafew.ThisareaofPhoenixcannotbe
expandedintoalegislatedpreserve.Toomanyapartmentsintheareahasalreadyincreasedcrime,drugsand
trafficcongestion.AnyadditionalhousingandapartmentdevelopmentrequestsinthenorthPhoenixareamust
bedenied.Respectfully,BillShackelford.VotingResident
Usethatareatobikethetrails.Wanttokeepthespacenaturalbeautynotfilledwithhomes.
Wanttokeeparealowertraffic
Welovethebeautyandtranquilityofthedesert.
WelovethebeautyoftheSonoranPreserve.Pleaseprotectwhatisleftandsavethebeautyofthedessert.
Welovetohikethisbeautifularea.AlsothedrivedownSonoranparkwayisincredible.Wemustpreservethis
desertnotonlyforhumanenjoymentbutalsothewildlifethatcallithome
Weneedtokeepasmuchnatureuntouchedandbeautiful.
Weneedtopreservethebeautyofournaturalhabitats.Therearealreadyplentyofplacesthatarezonedfor
building.Pleasedonotletgreedruinourneighborhood.
WeneedtopreservethebeautyoftheSonoranPreserve.
Weneedtopreservetheopenspacesthatattractsomanytotheareaforrecreation.Thereisalotofbuildingof
highoccupancyunitsandhousingunderway.Schoolsarealreadyatcapacity,newservicesarebeingbuilton
Jomaxtoeasetheinflux,roadinfrastructureneedstobeinconsiderationto.
Whilethecontinuedexpansionofhomesandbuildingintothisareaisinevitableandneeded,themaintenance
oftheDesertCharacterOverlayisimportanttokeepthebeautyandfeelofthisarea.Theresidentswholive
heremovedhereforareason,andweappreciatetheforethoughtthatwentintotheDesertCharacterOverlay
originally.Pleasedonotabandonthis.Itwouldbeonethingifthebuilderwerebuildingreasonablypriced
homestoassistwiththeaffordablehousingshortage,buttheyarenot.Thisrequestispurelyforthefinancial
advantageofthebuilderandthedetrimentofourcommunity.
Becasuewehikethetrailsregularlyandthefeelingofbeinglostinnaturesoclosetohomeisspecial.Itshould
beprotectedandIhopemydaughtercanenjoyitthesamewayoneday.
IliveintheSonorandesertnorthofPhoenix,Don’twantitdestroyedbycontinuingbuilding.Leaveitinit’s
naturalstate,sowecanenjoythedesertforgenerationsplease.
Pleasepreservethebeautifuldesert.
Withalltheplanneddevelopmentinthearea,Ihaveamajorconcernabouttheinfrastructure,andeven
plannedexpansion,beingabletosupporttheadditionalhousinginthepreserve.Partoftheappealofourareais
thedesertbeauty,soadditionally,overturningdistrictsafeguardsnotonlydamagesthenaturalenvironment,
butrisksallthosethatalreadylive/workinthiscommunity.
IbelievetherearemultiplereasonsforkeepingourviewsforalltoenjoyͲtopreservethedesertandthe
animalsͲsowecanenjoythesolaceinthiswonderfulareabywalking,biking,drivingorjustplainrelaxinginthe
outdoors.AlsodrivingonthisSonoranstretchofroadcurrentlyneedsmorerestrictionsͲsuchastrafficlightsat
allintersectionsforturning.MuchspeedingͲneedtohavemoremonitoringofspeedrequirements.Adding
morehousingisjustgoingtoaddtoaloseofthedesertpreserveandimpossiblestreet/roadconditions.When
webuiltourhomehere,weweretoldthattherewererestrictionstokeepourdesertpreserved.
WiththeamountoftrafficonSonoran/DoveValleytoday,whenwepulloutofSonoranGateCommunity,itis
takingachanceonyourlifewhenneedingtoturnleft.Whywouldanyoneapprovemorehomebuildingtoget
moretraffic?AlsocarsͲandtrucksͲarespeedingbetween55Ͳ70milesanhouronthisstretch.Youshouldhave
trafficlightsatallintersectionsforturningtraffic.Also,Let'sSaveOurDesertViewsͲthat'swhywebuiltahome
Ibelievehonoringthemeaningofthepreserveisofutmostimportance.
Page 399
Myfamilyhikesandmountainbikesseveraltimesperweekonthesetrails.Wetrulyappreciatethislandand
wouldnotwantitsinhabitantstobedisruptedanyfurtherthantheyalreadyare.
ThesceneryisbeautifulalongSonoranDesertDriveandtoseesectionsofitbeingdevelopedforhousing
projectswilltakeawayfromthebeautythatwehaveallcometoloveaboutthisarea.
AsaresidentlivingatFireside,Ihaveseenjavelinas(uptoadozenatatime)andotherwildanimalscomeupto
ourhomelookingforfoodandemptyinggarbageatnight.Bytearingdownmorenaturalandwildhabitatfor
additionalhomeswillonlyincreasetheexistingproblemsfortheanimalsinthedessertwhenmoreoftheir
naturalhabitatistorndown.Stoptearingintothenaturalsurroundingpreserve.
WemovedtoourcurrenthometoenjoythebenefitsofhavingaccesstotheSonoranPreserve.TheDesert
CharacterOverlayDistrictwascreatedtopreservetheintegrityofthispreciouscommodity,ifitisignored,the
beautyandrecreationalbenefitsofthepreservewillbesignificantlyreduced.
Iparticipateinrunningandhikingintheareaandtreasurethenaturalbeautyofthedesertlandscape.
WehaveoverpopulatedtheNorthPhoenixareaalreadywithmanydenseresidencies,namelyapartment
complexesandtownhomes.Ibelieveweneedtoslowdownandconsiderexpansioninadifferentdirectionso
thatwedon'tlosemanyofourbeautifulmountainandnatureparcelsthatweneedtosave.Ifeelthisisbeing
rushedandhasnotbeenthoroughlyreviewedandvetted.
I’velivedinthepreserveareasinceIwasverylittle.Weneedtokeepthedesertadesert,ournativeanimalsare
continuallybeingforcedtocohabitatewithhumansandit’snotgoingwelk.Continuetogivethemtheirspace
sothatwecanalllivetogetherwithouthostileinteraction
Hikingandtheoverallaccesstotheoutdoors
Myconcernisforpublicsafetyfirstandforemost.InadditiontothewideningoftheSonoranroadwayandthe
disregardfortheserenityofthedesert.FinallyIfeeltheCityisgrowingtoofastwithlittleregardforPublic
Safetyandinfrastructuregrowth.
Thisissoimportanttoprotectthenaturalbeauty,wildlife,ecosystems,andquietqualityoflifethatdraws
peopletotheareaandthestateingeneral.Pleaseacttopreventthepotentiallyirreparabledamagediscarding
thesesafeguardscouldcause!
Weneedtomaintainthebeautyofthevalley.Areasneedtobeprotectedandrespectedsoallcanenjoy.
IusetheSonoranpreservealmostdailytogetabriefreprievefromtheovercrowdingofPhoenix.Theabilityto
brieflyenjoythedesertviewswithoutseeingendlessdevelopmentsandchokingsmogofcarsiswhywedecided
toliveinthisarea.
PleasefollowtheDesertCharacterOverlayDistrictplan.Keeptrafficlowandundevelopedlandsowecanenjoy
thepreserve.
TheSonoranpreserveisaspotwhereIhike,bikeandrun5Ͳ6timesperweek.Itrulyenjoythebeautifulnatural
preservethisareahas.TheanimalsIseeduringmyadventuresisalsopriceless.Itrulyhopethispetitionmakes
achange!
Page 400
From: Anthony M Grande
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Z-TA-5-18-2 (Companion Cases Z-62-18-2, Z-75-18-2, and GPA-DSTV-1-18- 2)
Date: Monday, April 4, 2022 9:54:09 AM
Attachments: CB_ltr_2019_cmt.docx
Anthony Grande
Planner II – Village Planner
Planning & Development Department
Long Range Planning
Office: 602-256-5648
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
From: Mandy Fellows
Sent: Monday, April 4, 2022 7:17 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Z-TA-5-18-2 (Companion Cases Z-62-18-2, Z-75-18-2, and GPA-DSTV-1-18- 2)
Dear Mr. Grande,
In regards to the above subject items scheduled at Desert View Village Meeting on 4/5/22.
First, I have attached a letter written by Dr. Sullivan in 2019 regarding this immediate area. He and a
team from ASU have spent the past 32 years study the elite wildlife and fauna. I would like his letter
distributed, again, to the Village committee. It was given to participants in 2019 when this same
Development was presenting at that time. The letter speaks for itself
Second, I would like to formally request a FEMA study of this Floodplain Designated area prior to the
topsoil being disturbed. Any movement of this Floodplain will create significant increases into
Apache and Cave Creek washes that surround this proposed development. In addition, the bridges
on Sonoran Parkway for these two washes need to be re-evaluated for increased flow! Their bottom
of girder elevation is just at the FEMA 100 year flood flow and they could potentially be wiped out
with increased water activity. These two bridges, if wiped out during a massive monsoon rain, would
strand any homeowners as the access roads out of the development are only between these two
bridges.
Page 401
Lastly, I would like the committee to understand that the Desert Character Overlay has been in place
since the Sonoran Parkway was put in and needs to be adhered to, as does the current and long
standing Zoning. Just because Taylor Morrison doesn't like it does not make it appropriate to
rezone!! They should be required to alter the development to fit within all those ordinances!! Why
should it be the other way around?? Thousands of Sonoran Preserve wildlife and fauna will be
ruined to put in massive utilities and that is unacceptable as well! A smaller, more elite developer
could build homes on 1 acre sites, less traffic and less utilities! They could sell for 1M+ and no
ordinance changes would be needed. Taylor Morrison is only out for greed and if these ordinances
are changed for them they will surely only want more and more.
The Village and City Planning MUST enforce the DCO and Zoning requirements put in place after
millions of dollars of studies!!
Thank you for your attention and distribution of this letter to the Village for tomorrow's meeting.
Sincerely,
Mandy Fellows
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android [go.onelink.me]
Page 402
15 March 2019
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Dear Committee Members:
I understand that as a committee, you will consider a proposed rezoning (“Z-62-18-2”)
of a parcel of land immediately north of Cave Buttes in northern Maricopa County. I
contact you to respectfully request that you oppose this rezoning. By so doing you will
act both to protect the natural resource value of the entire Cave Creek watershed and
to subsequently promote additional acquisitions rather than additional development.
I hope to draw your attention to the biological resources available in Cave Buttes,
Maricopa County, resources used by scientists and students, bikers and hikers, bird
watchers and nature enthusiasts, as well as simple residents in their everyday lives. By
placing a high value on the natural diversity of the Cave Buttes area, by insuring that
your actions contribute to the preservation of that area to the fullest extent possible, I
think that you will maximize the use and enjoyment of those areas by all Phoenix area
residents over the coming years of continued growth and coincident incursions into the
surrounding landscapes. I provide my comments as a scientist, resident of the area,
and concerned citizen. More specifically, as a professor of ecology and evolutionary
biology, I have been working in Cave Buttes over 40 years, and in the past ten years
have been conducting continuous long-term studies of a number of wildlife species in
the area (e.g., desert tortoises, horned lizards, spadefoot toads, and others). I know it
well.
Rezoning of the parcel in question will have two major and immediate impacts: 1) loss
of unique valley floor and small wash habitats due to development; and 2) loss of a
critical wildlife corridor connecting the current mountain preserves through the central
valley floor (north and south), and some degree of impact on adjacent corridors in
nearby washes (Apache and Cave creeks). These losses are outlined in greater detail
below.
Habitat loss: flats or valley floors and small washes are unique additions to biotic
diversity of mountain (i.e., upland only) preserves. The specific area in question
represents prime habitat between the southern and northern Union Hills, as it contains
numerous small “feeder” washes between the major drainages of Cave Creek (to the
east) and Apache Wash (to the west). The adjacent floodplains (“flats) and these
washes contain unique habitats not contained within the current mountain preserves
(Sonoran Preserve, north and south). As documented in the Sonoran Preserve Master
Plan (Anonymous, 1998) and the original vegetation surveys (1996, 1998), these wash
habitats are botanically rich, and used by a variety of wildlife species. The valley floor in
this area also contains remnant grassland species (eg, Tobosa, Pencil Cholla and Cane
Page 403
Cholla) rarely encountered in the Phoenix metro area (more commonly associated with
the Agua Fria Grasslands to the immediate north).
Corridor impacts: The loss of this much habitat adjacent to the Parkway further
degrades the corridor potential over and above that resulting from the Parkway alone.
These connections or corridors allow for critical population exchange. A number of
species, including Sonoran Desert tortoises, javelina, mountain lion and many others,
use the valley floors as corridors. For example, desert tortoises only rarely leave the
uplands, but they must be able to traverse valley floors to maintain a series of
connected populations, genetically speaking. Faced with the prospect of even larger
numbers of local residents, the current connectivity between north and south preserves
would be further compromised.
The most immediate need is for larger areas of valley floors and washes to be
preserved adjacent to the existing mountain preserves, providing both additional habitat
absent from the upland slope areas already protected, AND providing important
linkages for wildlife traveling between these preserves. The broad, historic floodplain
between Apache Wash and Cave Creek, precisely the area to be developed, is the most
desirable acreage to serve the purposes described above (maintain diversity, promote
gene exchange and population connectivity). Ideally, if additional development MUST
occur, it should be moved to the east or the west along the parkway, leaving this high
quality habitat intact.
I can safely state that I have spent more time in Cave Buttes that anyone over the past
ten years. I urge you to use your advisory power to promote protection of this land
and to aid the city of Phoenix in upholding its duty under the public trust to preserve
the value of the land for future generations.
Sincerely,
Brian K. Sullivan, PhD
Professor of Herpetology and Evolutionary Biology
Arizona State University
Page 404
References:
Anonymous, 1998. Sonoran Preserve Master Plan. City of Phoenix., Burke, J. and J. Ewan, primary
authors. 57 pp.
Ewan, J. M., R. Fish Ewan, T. Craig, and S. Scheiner. 1996. Cave Creek Wash preservation boundary
study. Herberger Center for Design Excellence, ASU, Tempe.
Ewan, J. M., and R. Fish Ewan. 1998. North Phoenix Wash vegetation study. Herberger Center for Design
Excellence, ASU, Tempe. 43 pp.
Page 405
From: Ann Wilde
To: Julianna Pierre; Anthony M Grande
Subject: Z-TA-5-18-2
Date: Monday, April 4, 2022 10:09:23 PM
Please distribute the comments below to members of the Desert View Planning
Committee.
Not long ago I was at the Whitewater Draw and saw a Nature Note posited by Arizona
Game and Fish Department:
In part the Note read, "The primary threat to the existence of any wildlife population is
the loss or degradation of its habitat. . . .Take away the lifeblood of an ecosystem,
and in time, the ecosystem also dies."
On the VerdinPhoenix.com website one reads:
"As State Trust land surrounding Sonoran Desert Drive is auctioned off in the future
for employment, commercial, and residential uses to support . . . this growth, our goal
is that Verdin will set a stunning precedent for desert-sensitive development adjacent
to the Sonoran Preserve."
Also stated:
"Our vision for Verdin is to create an authentic desert community that brings the
wonder and peace of nature into daily life."
The two statements conflict with the request to amend (or move away from the
proposed project) the provisions that protect the desert ecosystem. Once the
ecosystem is altered in a major way, it won't recover. Unintended repercussions may
develop in coming years. For many years the area currently proposed for
development has been zoned for a housing density that was determined suitable for
the area.
Please hold firm to the vision in place when it was written that "the Desert View
Village has "land uses [that] compliment the equestrian ranch properties, with vast
amounts of open space and large lot single-family residences."
The desert maintenance overlay Sub-District A does not have to be amended or
removed for development to occur--only for development to occur as currently
proposed for the Verdin project.
The existing and current zoning requiring lower density housing supports
better preservation of habitat and movement of wildlife.
The City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance Section 653A states that "[the] Desert
Maintenance Overlay Subdistrict A is the least intensive with regards to density
allowed and the most restrictive in order to maintain the fragile undisturbed areas and
the wildlife corridor along Cave Creek Wash."
The ordinance continues in 653B to state "[It's] purpose . . . is to guide development
that will blend with the undisturbed desert environment rather than dominate it."
The advantages of maintaining the desert maintenance character overlay:
Page 406
-provides guidance for new development to occur within the context of the fragile
undisturbed desert;
-encourages development that will blend with the undisturbed desert rather than
dominate it;
-natural washes and the surrounding area are protected.
As an ordinary person who lives in the general area and values nature and the desert,
I support keeping the desert maintenance character overlay as it currently exists
along Sonoran Desert Drive.
I respectfully request that you give serious consideration to supporting development
at the lower housing density supported by the Desert Maintenance Character
Overlay. I realize that housing is needed; more housing requires more water and
infrastructure; and growth will not be stopped. Hopefully, with your recommendation,
growth will occur in a measured manner that supports maintaining a desert character,
rather than a large master planned community with triple the number of homes
imposed on a fragile ecosystem.
Thank you for taking the time to consider these thoughts.
Ann Wilde
Page 407
From: Anthony M Grande
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Letter to the Desert View VPC for the Verdin Project (Formerly MacEwen 480)
Date: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 12:55:25 PM
Anthony Grande
Planner II – Village Planner
Planning & Development Department
Long Range Planning
Office: 602-256-5648
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
From: Keeli Keeler
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 12:52 PM
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Letter to the Desert View VPC for the Verdin Project (Formerly MacEwen 480)
As a local resident in the area and concerned citizen I would like to reach out to you, the Desert View
Village Planning Committee, as you prepare to meet this evening to discuss and vote on the Verdin
Project. I am not opposed to development of the property off of Sonoran Desert Drive across
from the Preserve, however, I am opposed to the realignment and zoning amendments that
Taylor Morrison is seeking approval for in relation to the Verdin/MacEwen 480 Project, Z-62-18-
2.
Development is bound to occur as people continue to move to the Phoenix area and more housing is
needed. However, I ask for you to consider the overwhelming presence of residents living in the
area, outdoor enthusiasts who frequently bike and hike in the area, and people invested in the
preservation of this land from all across Phoenix that were in such strong opposition to these same
proposed changes back in 2019. I appreciate that after such a strong opposition that Taylor Morrison
went back to the drawing board to address some of the concerns of traffic and partnered with the
National Wildlife Foundation to address some of the preservation concerns. However, they are still
requesting to remove other protective measures that were put in place to help preserve the
beauty of this land and surrounding preserve. It is a unique piece of land that is directly across
from the Preserve, and should be treated as such. Decisions made for development today will
impact future development along this corridor when state trust land is sold off to developers. The
community and the VPC are in a unique position to keep developers accountable for responsible
Page 408
development in such a unique and beautiful part of the valley.
This property in consideration was a privately owned parcel that was sold to Taylor Morrison and
does in fact currently allow for development of homes. However, the current zoning would restrict
Taylor Morrison to 1 home per acre. Under current zoning, these would be estate properties
similar to some of the other unique and protected areas around Northern Phoenix like the Boulders,
Spur Cross Ranch, etc., and would support the initial intent of zoning in this area to minimize impact
to the surrounding desert. However, Taylot Morrison is not in the business of estate-type properties,
but instead the business master planned communities with as many homes as possible. Taylor
Morrison's attorney has gone so far as trying to convince everyone that by adding in some open
edges, homeowner classes, and by creating trails to join to the preserve that it will not change how
the desert looks or impact any of the surrounding wildlife, plants, and preserve by increasing the
zoning to allow 3-5 homes per acre. While these are all nice things to add to the community that
came from suggestions by the NWF, it is absolutely false as rezoning to allow that many homes
will in fact impact the surrounding desert, wildlife and strain resources. Rezoning the parcel in
question will have some major and immediate impacts: 1) negative impact to the habitat
from development and destruction of the unique valley floor 2) negative impact to the wildlife
corridor, and 3) subsequent impact on adjacent land, flora, fauna and wildlife. Taylor Morrison is a
business - the business of building as many homes for as much profit as they possibly can - these
requests for rezoning are nothing more than that. For them it isn't about the environment or the
community, but profits and opportunities to maximize growth. I strongly request the VPC to
consider the impact that the rezoning request would have and vote NO on the portion of the
request.
Taylor Morrison is also requesting to move and/or completely remove the desert character overlay
from the property in question. Their attorney and council has tried to create a story that the initial
plan for the desert character overlay was only the intent for that time period versus a well thought
out effort to help protect an important habitat from massive future development. Additionally,
Taylor Morrison's legal representative has also tried to state that it should be moved because of the
change in where the road was put through instead of the initial plan of where the road was
anticipated to go. Based on the research that I was able to do and comments from others who were
around when the group was formed to create the initial desert character overlay, the intent of the
desert character overlay took into account the future intent to develop in the area and was created
to in fact help protect vital areas of the desert to minimize impact to the Preserve. Taylor
Morrison's attorney has created a false narrative in order to benefit a developer who has
attempted to appear like they are invested in sustainable and thoughtful development, but by all
attempts of removing protections in place is the exact opposite. Attempts to move the desert
character overlay north of Sonoran Desert Drive actually removes the desert character overlay
completely from the Taylor Morrison property for the Verdin project, and is completely useless as
that area is preserve land and as such is protected. By allowing a change/removal of the desert
character overlay to happen, it would also have major impacts to the surrounding desert and
wildlife, and only benefits the developer to allow more homes in an area in which they were never
intended. I strongly request the VPC to consider the impact that the desert overlay request
would have and vote NO on the portion of the request.
Page 409
At the North Gateway VPC meeting last month, Taylor Morrison had some of their homeowners who
live in the neighboring Sonoran Gate community speak up in support of this development. The sole
argument from the two homeowners in support was the need for affordable housing in Phoenix and
how great it would be to have affordable housing in such a unique location so that people can enjoy
it. While it is true that Phoenix can use some additional affordable housing and that this is indeed a
unique piece of land in a unique area next to the preserve, any efforts to create "affordable
housing" will not exist in this area despite the lot size or number of homes just based on
proximity to the preserve and surrounding views. Additionally, this argument in support fails to
consider the impact that allowing this development to markedly change zoning requirements to
add at least 3-4 times the amount of homes in the intended area will have on the surrounding
desert as well as the future development that will follow as the state trust land is sold off to other
developers, which will completely negate any argument of people being able to enjoy it. People can
currently enjoy it by visiting the Apache Wash Trailhead to bike, hike, horseback ride, enjoy the
scenery and the wildlife. Mass development will impact the environment, wildlife, views, and
therefore make the area less of a beauty to enjoy. The Verdin / MacEwen 480 project will set a
precedent for how future development will go. Please help us stand in opposition to a massive
development right next to the preserve and support the intent of the current desert character
overlay and zoning to uphold responsible and sustainable development along this corridor.
As I had mentioned prior, development is bound to occur based on sheer need, but the decisions
that are made now can either help support responsible development in such a unique location or
solely benefit this developer and the others to come without taking into account the community
and Preserve.
I would request that the Desert View VPC:
1) Maintain the Master Plan as originally proposed within the current zoning
2) Maintain the desert character overlay to effectively control development surrounding the entire
Preserve area
3) Recognize the impact that the desert, Preserve, wildlife, flora and fauna, strain on resources, and
stress on infrastructure that massive development would have within the corridor.
Sincerely,
Keeli Keeler
Homeowner in Sonoran Foothills (Phoenix 85085)
Page 410
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: Fwd: Sonoran preserve. Let"s actually preserve it!
Date: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 1:35:58 PM
Please add to the public record
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Dawn M
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 1:10 PM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Sonoran preserve. Let's actually preserve it!
Jim,
As a local resident, I am against any realignment/zoning amendment of Phoenix’s Master
Plan for the Sonoran Preserve as it relates to Taylor Morrison’s request for the
Verdin/McEwan 480 Project, Z-62-18-2. Key objection elements of the amendment include:
1. Remove the Desert Character Overlay requirement
2. Build homes outside of existing infrastructure
3. Massive up zone, 3–5 houses per acre
The developer is seeking to transform the Desert Character Overlay around the Preserve.
Moving it north of Sonoran Desert Drive is actually removing it because north of Sonoran
Desert Drive is the Preserve itself.
Regardless of previous statements, if all Plan Amendments proposed are passed, the
development will not be “truly unique.” Nor will it be as the developer committed, “ . . . a
context-sensitive community that sets the bar high for any future development in the area.”
It seems all the developer sees is growth, not thoughtful development, or sustainability. This
Plan Amendment only benefits the developer and not the community or the Preserve.
I am not a “recreational activist,” as cited on a recent local newscast. My objections seek to:
a. Maintain the Master Plan as originally proposed
b. Recognize the dismal condition of the Valley’s current and future water supply
c. Maintain the overlay as the effective way to control development in the entire Preserve
area
Kindly,
Dawn Mannon
Phoenix, Az
*******
Page 411
From: Anthony M Grande
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: preserving the Sonoran preserve
Date: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 1:16:24 PM
Anthony Grande
Planner II – Village Planner
Planning & Development Department
Long Range Planning
Office: 602-256-5648
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
From: Dawn M
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 1:13 PM
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: preserving the Sonoran preserve
As a resident of Phoenix (for almot 50 years), I have seen mass destruction of our beautiful desert. I
employ you to keep the desert overlay at the Sonoran Preserve. Please do not build massive
amounts of homes in our desert.
thank you,
Dawn Mannon
Phoenix, AZ
Page 412
From: Susanne Rothwell
To: Julianna Pierre
Cc: Patrick and Eileen McMullen
Subject: FW: Final PMPC Letter (and contact info if helpful!)
Date: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 10:52:39 AM
Attachments: FINAL 2022_03_31 Letter to City of Phoenix re VERDIN Applications[1].docx
Importance: High
Hello Julianna and the Desert View Village Planning Committee,
Please read the attached letter from Phoenix Mountains Preservation Committee (PMPC) President
Patrick McMullen and the PMPC board.
It is in regards to the proposed Taylor Morrison ‘Verdin’ re-zoning case coming before the
Committee tomorrow.
It is late so hoping that you will have some time to read it, as it is a particularly important issue for
the PMPC.
Kindest regards,
Susanne Rothwell
PMPC
Page 413
PMPC SUMMARY - APRIL 3, 2022
The Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, a 501(c)(4) non-profit organization charged
with the protection of the Phoenix Mountains Preserves write to you with our strong
support and encouragement to engage and monitor the Verdin Development of the 480
acres situated to the west of Cave Creek Wash and to the south of the Sonoran Parkway.
The Verdin location abuts to Sonoran Preserve.
The attached legal research conducted by the PMPC Attorney, lists our concerns and we
hope that you and City departments will continue to take them seriously and will apply the
sections of the zoning Ordinance that were written and included into the Ordinance to
protect these Preserve adjacencies and to ensure that the Preserves will remain available
to the public and enjoyable as well.
PMPC understands that Phoenix is a rapidly growing city and that large numbers of the
new population must be accommodated. A great effort was undertaken in past decades
to have the Sonoran Preserve acquired by the City at tax payer expense, with a large
effort by PMPC to identify and help to support the City efforts. We therefore are very
dedicated to keeping the Preserves available to the local citizens, and the Desert
Character Overlay continued and appreciated.
The Verdin Development planning team has taken important steps in the linking up of the
Sonoran Preserves, emphasis on desert plant maintenance, protection of plants and
animals, and meaningful public access to the Desert Preserves surrounding the new
Verdin development. What is needed is a more formal arrangement between the City of
Phoenix, Phoenix Citizens and the Verdin 480 Acre Development project team.
As a remembrance; On February 17, 1998, the [City] Council also voted unanimously to
adopt the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan and to move forward in acquiring this open
space. In doing so, the Council continues a time-honored precedent for protecting and
preserving desert open space within the city and for ensuring recreational access for our
citizens.”
PMPC is intensely interested in the pending development of the Verdin 480 acre site, as
it is an early project in the development of this corridor, and especially important for the
continued Desert character Overlay District enforcement.
Sincerely,
Patrick McMullen, PhD
Patrick McMullen, PhD
PMPC President
Page 414
March 3, 2022
Mayor Kate Gallego Phoenix City Councilmembers
Phoenix City Hall Phoenix City Hall
200 W. Washington St. 200 W. Washington St.
Phoenix, AZ 85003 Phoenix, AZ 85003
Re: Objections of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, Inc. (PMPC) to
the Four Applications Submitted for “Verdin” Development Proposal (GPA-
DSTV-1-18-2, Z-75-18-2, Z-TA-5-18-2 and Z-62-18-2)
Dear Mayor Gallego:
This letter is submitted by the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, Inc.
(PMPC) in opposition to the proposed Taylor Morrison “Verdin” housing development
project south of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th Street and 32nd Street alignments,
just west of Cave Creek Road in northern Phoenix (formerly “MacEwen 480”). We
understand that developer Taylor Morrison has filed several applications in furtherance
of this development including two zoning amendments, a General Plan Amendment, and
a Planned Unit Development application (hereinafter the “four applications”). 1 We
understand that these four applications were simultaneously approved by the North
Gateway Village Planning Committee on March 10, 2022 2, and the Desert View Village
Planning Committee is scheduled to meet on these four applications on April 5, 2022. 3
PMPC strongly objects to any actions, at any level, that would advance the four
applications as written, for reasons stated herein. First – the Desert Maintenance Overlay
District should not be modified but must remain intact, ensuring that washes, sensitive
species and their habitats, and the delicate desert ecosystem remain protected. The
rezoning is not simply a “technical clean-up” as the developer casually asserts, 4 but
rather, this rezoning would be an unprecedented rollback of protections carefully
researched and thoughtfully added to the Phoenix Zoning Code for this specific area
decades ago – protections that were specifically adopted to protect this desert area from
the very type of development pressure that is presented here. Second – simultaneous
consideration and approval of these four applications is contrary to the law and City of
Phoenix policy. Furthermore, public notice has been deficient.
General Plan Amendment (GPA-DSTV-1-18-2); Zoning Amendments (Z-75-18-2 and Z-75-5-
18); and Planned Unit Development (Z-62-18-2).
See Notice of Results, North Gateway Village Planning Committee Meeting (March 10, 2022).
See Notice of Public Meeting, Desert View Village Planning Committee (April 5, 2022).
See Letter re Z-75-18-2 Zoning Map Amendment (December 17, 2021), p.2
Page 415
On behalf of PMPC, I ask that these applications not be approved as written but
that the Desert Maintenance Overlay District remain wholly intact, ensuring that
protections to washes, sensitive species and their habitats, and the delicate desert
ecosystem remain as intended.
About PMPC
The Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, Inc. is an organization founded in
1970 by Arizona visionaries dedicated to the protection of Phoenix’s Mountain Preserve
system. For the last 50 years, PMPC and its members have worked tirelessly to preserve,
protect, and advocate for the precious Mountain Preserve system, and to monitor and
address the rapid growth and development surrounding these important public resources.
For much of Phoenix’s modern history, our PMPC membership has worked hard
alongside hundreds of concerned Phoenix citizens and City staff to ensure that the
Sonoran Desert Preserves are protected and maintained as a valuable resource for all
citizens of Phoenix.
I. The Desert Maintenance Overlay District Must Not Be Altered
For many decades, protecting and preserving the unique desert features of the
Phoenix Sonoran Preserve and the surrounding area has been a priority for the City of
Phoenix. The PMPC and its members were involved in and supported the development
and adoption of the Desert Maintenance Overlay District (“DMOD” or “DMOD Overlay”)
at Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance in 2001, and the related working groups and
charettes involved with that process, as well as the formation and expansion of the
Phoenix Mountain Preserves. We support the critical protections carefully enacted by the
outlined in the DMOD Overlay, which must remain intact.
The true history of how the DMOD Overlay was developed is compelling. It is a
landmark instance of how land planning and landscape ecological principles can be
integrated as part of policy drafting processes. It should be a point of pride for the City of
Phoenix, and an asset worth protecting. Furthermore, the history shows that the DMOD
Overlay area and its boundaries were not simply dictated by road alignments (as the
developer incorrectly claims), but instead were carefully studied and thoughtfully drafted
in a manner integrating ecological considerations with planning structure, as part of one
of the most robust and widely supported Phoenix endeavors, to date. Finally, the owner(s)
of the “Verdin” property have owned this land for at least the last half-century, and have
had ample time and opportunities to challenge its classification over the last several
decades. The DMOD Overlay must not be altered.
Page 416
History of the Desert Maintenance Overlay District (DMOD)
On July 5, 2001, the approximately 6,724-acre DMOD was added to the Phoenix City
Zoning Ordinance at Section 653 (Sub-Districts A & B), shown on the following page. 5
It was carefully constructed by a large, interdisciplinary collaborative effort over
several years to study and understand the unique and sensitive characteristics of this
area, and protect those characteristics from the pressures of development. Historical city
documents and studies, reports, articles, and other research materials describe this
history, as summarized below.
1980s
On January 19, 1985, a large portion of northern Phoenix (including the current
DMOD Overlay area) was annexed into the city. 6 Tensions between increasing
development and impacts on sensitive desert areas were rising during this time. Spurred
in part by these tensions and concerns over the proposed development at Tatum Ranch, 7
the City Council developed a plan for this larger area, then called the peripheral Areas C
and D Areas, with “extensive” community assistance from a Council-appointed Citizen’s
See Zoning Ordinance Section 653 (Desert Character Overlay Districts).
See North Land Use Plan (May 1997), at 4; see also City of Phoenix Annexation Map.
See Quay, Ray. “Bridging the Gap Between Ecological Research and Land Use Policy: The
North Sonoran Collaborative” Urban Ecosystems, 7:283-294 (2004). Tatum Ranch was one of
the first developments to use groundwater and wastewater, opening the doors for more
development north of the CAP canal.
Page 417
Advisory Committee, as well as support from the State. 8 The Peripheral Areas C & D Plan
was adopted in 1987.
The Peripheral Areas C and D Plan was intended to direct the City of Phoenix on
future land use and development densities “to ensure that development in the area was
compatible with and complementary to the unique and environmentally sensitive
characteristics of the area.” 9 The Peripheral Areas C & D Plan describes this new
proactive approach: “Normally, the City is placed in a reactive role with respect to guiding
growth of a developing area. These northern areas; however, are largely undeveloped
and provide the City with a unique opportunity to anticipate growth and to establish an
overall framework to guide physical development.”10 Even at the time, the City recognized
that more work would be needed towards developing future protections, such as an
ordinance. 11
1990s
Development continued to increase in northern Phoenix during the early 1990s.
Subsequently, concerns about density and form of development within the ecologically
sensitive desert areas came to a critical point. A diverse group of public and private
planners, designers, environmental scientists, landscape architects, university
departments, as well as representatives from state agencies, private consultants, the City
of Phoenix, and State of Arizona began collaborating on a variety of studies, plans, and
charrettes for this area during this time. 12 This group (called the North Sonoran
Collaborative), formed and met regularly to address the gap between managing growth
and the ecological data needed to accomplish these goals. Their research was organized
into a multi-disciplinary GIS database, 13 one of the early instances of GIS usage by the
city and significant part of the group’s success.
The City of Phoenix began the process of revising the General Plan with detailed
objectives and design standards for this area during this time. The absence of ecological
See General Plan: Peripheral Areas C and D, City of Phoenix Planning Department, October
1987.
See City of Phoenix Planning Department Staff Report No. 58-01-02 (June 13, 2001),
recommending approval of the DMOD Overlay, at 2. Obtained via Public Records Request.
See FN 8 at 1.
See FN 9 at 2.
See FN 9 (p.2); see also FN 7; see also “ASU Program Stresses Ecological Approach to City
Planning”, University of Arizona Water Resources Research Center Newsletter, November-
December 1999, at 9.
See Ward, B., Burke, J., Ewan, J., Fish Ewan, R., Miller, W., Quay, R., Steiner, F. 1999. “A
Collaborative Approach to Planning.” ASU School of Planning & Landscape Architecture.
Page 418
information about the Northern Sonoran Desert was quickly recognized as a major
barrier, 14 so the City turned to the North Sonoran Collaborative and Arizona State
University (ASU) School of Planning and Landscape Architecture to conduct this much-
needed work. The city funded a detailed study of the Cave Creek Wash by ASU, the
success of which led to several additional studies of other nearby washes. 15 The Cave
Creek Study also helped build momentum for the acquisition of 15,000 acres of Preserve
lands including along the Cave Creek Wash corridor.
As a result of these extensive studies, a radical departure in methodology was
forming. “Basing preservation boundaries on ecosystems rather than topography or land
ownership is new to Phoenix. In the past, boundaries did not reflect the ecological
systems inherent in the landscape and so the impact of preserve size, shape, and
constitution on plant and wildlife habitats were not considered nor well understood.” 16
These and other processes led directly to the North Land Use Plan (adopted 1996)
and the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan (adopted 1998). Based in part on interviews with
neighbors in the area, the North Land Use Plan identified three Character Areas – the
Desert Preserve (today’s DMOD Overlay), the Rural Desert, and Suburban Desert – and
required that zoning overlay districts be created for each area “to provide clear
development standards which reflect community desires for each area.” 17
It is worth highlighting that the Desert Overlay development process was so unique
and ambitious that an entire session series of presentations were devoted to it at the 1999
American Planning Association’s National Conference held in Seattle, Washington. 18
Presenters included ASU professors, City of Phoenix Planning Deputy Director James
Burke, Assistant Director Ray Quay (all Collaborative members) who traveled from
Arizona to Washington to present their work to planners across the United States.
In a conference paper presented to planners nationwide, Terry Newton of the
Phoenix Planning Department noted that “the process for developing the three overlay
See FN 8.
This study was reportedly conducted by a team of ecologists and biologists from the ASU
Schools of Planning and Landscape Architecture and Life Sciences Department, Northern
Arizona University, the Desert Botanical Gardens, and the Arizona Game and Fish Department.
Their report on the biological values of Cave Creek Wash entitled “Cave Creek Wash:
Preservation Boundary Study” was published in 1996.
See Sonoran Preserve Master Plan (1998), at 16.
See North Land Use Plan (May 1997), at 19.
See 1999 APA National Planning Conference file (WorldCat record); see 1999 APA National
Planning Conference Table of Contents (see Session Series on The North Sonoran Collaborative,
five papers linked).
Page 419
ordinances is unlike any the city has undertaken in the past.” He continued, saying that
these guidelines could “set a new standard for the city’s approach to development in
natural desert areas for the city.” 19 He further described the specific acreage targeted for
protection:
“Much of the area identified by Subdistricts A and B is included in the
Arizona Preserve Initiative (API) application which is currently being
pursued by the city. Of the approximately 5,000 acres identified as
Subdistrict A, only 900 acres are outside of the API area. Subdistrict B
consists of approximately 1,700 acres with 1,500 acres falling outside of the
API area. Assuming the API area as currently identified successfully
becomes a preserve, approximately 2,400 acres in Subdistricts A and B
would remain for possible development. This is the area addressed by
this Overlay.” (Emphasis Added).
For reference, the current proposed rezoning applications submitted by developer
Taylor Morrison propose to remove approximately 218 acres of the 900 acres of
developable non-Preserve area from Subdistrict A, or about 24%. 20 While the number of
developable acreages may have shifted since this time, it is crucial to note that the
Overlay was developed to specifically target these developable acreages for protection
from intense development – including the intense residential development presented by
the “Verdin” project.
2000s
On June 13, 2001, the City Planning Commission met to consider and recommend
adoption of the DMOD Overlay to the City Council. On June 27, 2001, the City of Phoenix
granted the request as recommended, adopting the DMOD Overlay into the City Zoning
Ordinance. 21 Minutes from the June 13th Planning Commission hearing reveal the robust
community input and public involvement that supported writing the DMOD Overlay text. 22
Staff Report No. 58-01-2 23 recommending approval states:
See Newton, Terry, City of Phoenix Planning Department. Desert Character Overlay Zoning
District, Conference Paper presented to the American Planning Association, Seattle, WA. 1999.
See Staff Report – Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Z-TA-5-18-2 (March 9, 2022) at 12.
See FN 9. See also Application No. Z-TA-3-99-2 (to add the Desert Character Overlay District
at Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance); see Zoning Application No. Z-58-01-2 (establish the
Desert Maintenance Overlay District, one of three character districts authorized under Section
653); see Ordinance No. G-4380 and RCA35880 dated July 5, 2001 (adopting Ordinance).
See City of Phoenix Planning Commission Minutes (June 13, 2001) at 62; see also FN 9 at 2.
See FN 9.
Page 420
“The area has a high scenic value containing stands of dense native
vegetation, which support a delicate and fragile eco-system. Within the
proposed overlay is Cave Creek Wash, a unique wash system which is
designated for incorporation into the City of Phoenix Sonoran Preserve. The
Desert Maintenance District is intended to provide a buffer/transition
between this environmentally sensitive area and existing
development. This is an area with many washes of varying size which are
tributaries to Cave Creek Wash. It is an area of high habitat value that is
critical to the survival of numerous small mammals and a variety of
birds, as well as reptiles. Maintenance of the Sonoran Desert in this
area requires sensitive development strategies.”
2001), recommending approval of Z-58-01-2 and Z-TA-3-99-2. (Emphasis
added).
The DMOD Overlay was codified in the Zoning Ordinance at Section 653. Within
its very first paragraph: “The Desert Maintenance, Rural Desert and Suburban Desert
Overlay Districts are designed in response to existing undisturbed conditions and
pressures placed on them by increased development.” 24
The DMOD Overlay is split into Subdistricts A and B. Subdistrict A requires
minimum lot sizes of 35,000 square feet or greater, or 0-1.2 dwelling units per acre. 25
Subdistrict B requires minimum lot sizes of 18,000 square feet or greater, or 2-5 dwelling
units per acre. 26 Section 653(A) explains why development densities are more restrictive
in Subdistrict A (where a portion of the proposed “Verdin” project lies and which is the
subject of the rezoning applications) as follows:
“With the many washes to be maintained in an undisturbed condition
crossing this area, Subdistrict A is intended to provide a transition from the
preserve to areas with greater density. A very low density, scale and
intensity of residential development characterize this area. The
Desert Maintenance Overlay Subdistrict A is the least intensive with
regards to density allowed and the most restrictive in order to maintain the
fragile undisturbed areas and the wildlife corridor along the Cave Creek
Wash. Subdistrict B is characterized by low density development which may
be sited in clusters along with provision for an area to allow access to the
Cave Buttes Recreational Area. Through clustering of development in this
See FN 5 at Section (A).
See FN 5 at Section 653(B)(5); see also FN 9 at 3.
See FN 5 at Section 653(B)(6); see also FN 9 at 3.
Page 421
area the ability to maintain large connected undisturbed areas and washes
becomes possible.”
The DMOD Overlay is the only one of these three overlays completed to date. For
reasons not stated, the remaining two Desert Character Overlay Districts (Rural Desert
Overlay, Sec. 653(C) and the Suburban Desert Overlay, Sec. 653(D)) were never added
to the Desert Character Overlay District (Sec. 653), but have remained “Reserved” for the
past two decades. 27
While development has continued throughout the city, the thoughtfully formulated
Overlay at Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance has stood the test of time. Since adoption
in 2001, it has never been amended. However, granting the rezoning proposed by the
Taylor Morrison “Verdin” development to lift the DMOD Overlay will set a disastrous
precedent, allowing a developer to carve themselves out of the protective, robust Overlay
to facilitate their more dense (and thus more profitable) development plans. Removal of
these protections sets a chilling precedent for the survival of Sonoran Preserve and the
remaining acres of sensitive desert habitat and wash systems. The “Verdin” project
should not be exempted from the protective DMOD Overlay.
The “Technical Clean-Up” Road Alignment Argument Is Wrong
In a transparent effort to side step the powerful history and compelling reasoning
behind the Overlay, the developer claims that the requested rezonings (Z-75-18-2 and Z-
TA-5-18-2) to remove the DMOD Overlay from their property are just a “technical clean
ups” 28 to change the Overlay boundaries to align with Sonoran Desert Drive instead with
the Northeast Outer Loop alignment contemplated in the Peripheral Areas C & D Plan.
This is not true. The DMOD Overlay was never intended to move with any changes to the
proposed roadway.
The Sonoran Preserve Parkway route alignment involved a complex process that
included area residents, PMPC, the State Land Department, and Preserve and Parks
Committee study partners studying multiple alternatives. 29 After extensive public review,
one alignment was selected out of five. During a presentation to the Parks & Recreation
Board meeting, it was discussed that the selected Parkway alignment was chosen to
maintain existing wildlife corridors in the area, among other things. At the meeting Board
Chairperson Jim Holway asked “if there was a reason why the alignment had not been
See Zoning Ordinance Section 653 (Desert Character Overlay Districts), Subsections C & D.
See Letter from Susan Demmitt to Desert View Village Planner Julianna Pierre re Zoning Map
Amendment application Z-75-18-2 (December 17, 2021). Received via Public Records Request.
See Sonoran Desert Drive Alignment Study Fact Sheet.
Page 422
brought to the edge of the preserve.” Staff and Parks & Preserve Administrator Sarah Hall
explained that this was due to “major wash crossings” in the area, among other things. 30
A City Council Report recommending approval of the final Sonoran Parkway
alignment similarly states: “Special care was taken to maintain views of the surrounding
terrain, minimize scarring, preserve existing vegetation, and provide for wildlife crossings.
Provisions for future trail crossings have been incorporated and structure designs include
aesthetic treatment with native colors and textures to blend into the adjacent desert
landscape. Segments of the alignment will abut future Mountain Preserve and serve as a
buffer between the Mountain Preserve and adjacent development.” 31
Never, in any part of the extensive Sonoran Parkway alignment review process,
was there ever a mention that the new alignment was intended to redraw the boundary
of the recently-adopted DMOD Overlay. Rather, the Sonoran Parkway alignment was not
intended to redraw the DMOD Overlay, it was intended to traverse it. The alignment was
specifically chosen to be harmonious with sensitive ecological features, not to pull back
protections for these features as the developer seems to suggest now.
Even the City of Phoenix 32 appears to reject the developer’s “technical clean-up”
roadway claim. Below (left) is the applicant’s proposed rezoning, reducing the DMOD
Overlay over a large swath. Below (right) is the City’s proposed modification, which
exempts just the “Verdin” property from the DMOD Overlay. Plainly, from these maps, the
“technical clean-up” roadway claim does not stand.
See Phoenix Parks & Recreation Board Meeting Minutes (June 26, 2003) at 9-10.
See City Council Report, Transportation, Parks & Seniors Subcommittee (June 8, 2006).
See Staff Report Z-62-18-2 – Verdin PUD dated March 9, 2022.
Page 423
The proposed “Verdin” project lie underneath Mesquite Wash, an important habitat
for many desert species, which runs through the heart of the property. Removal of the
DMOD Overlay would entirely remove the protections to Mesquite Wash. The “Verdin”
project would also intrude on Cave Creek Wash to the east, an important wildlife corridor
between the existing Preserve lands located to the north and south. A development more
dense than currently allowed would threaten the integrity and cut off connectivity of these
wildlife corridors. Indeed, one of the smallest birds native to the Sonoran Desert known
as the “Verdin” makes its home in wildlife corridors and washes including those that
would be threatened by the proposed “Verdin” development.
A blatant carve-out of the “Verdin” property from the DMOD Overlay to enable
more dense development is inappropriate. This flies in the face of so many years of hard
work, thoughtful community input and public review, careful research, and proactive good
planning. It is directly contrary to the intent of the DMOD Overlay, which exists to
proactively protect the sensitive desert ecosystem from developmental pressures, not
react to their desires. It also sets an awful precedent, opening the doors for future
developers to make similar requests, rendering the DMOD Overlay effectively
meaningless.
II. ISSUES REGARDING PROCESS
Simultaneous Consideration of All Cases Is Not Permitted
These four applications were simultaneously presented on, discussed, and
approved for recommendation through a vote by the North Gateway Village Planning
Committee on March 10, 2022. 33 The Desert View Village Planning Committee is
scheduled to meet and take action on these “companion cases” on April 5, 2022. 34 This
is not permitted under City of Phoenix processes and the law.
The City of Phoenix’s General Plan Amendment Planning Process Guide 35 notes
that simultaneous review of rezoning applications and requests to amend the General
Plan is prohibited. It specifically states:
May my rezoning application be reviewed simultaneously with my
application to amend the GENERAL PLAN?
No. Current City policy requires that action on a rezoning application is
separate from the procedure to amend the General Plan as State law
requires that all rezoning be consistent with and conform to the adopted
See FN 2.
See FN 3.
See City of Phoenix General Plan Amendment Planning Process Guide (rev. 08/12/2021)
Page 424
General Plan. A hearing on the rezoning application is to occur subsequent
to a determination on the change to the General Plan. However, you may
file your rezoning application and be scheduled for a hearing agenda
following action on the General Plan amendment. Note: This requirement
can be waived by the Planning and Development Director upon written
request for special circumstances.
General Plan Amendment Planning Process Guide, at p.2
A.R.S. § 9-462.01(F) states in relevant part that “[a]ll zoning and rezoning
ordinances adopted under this article shall be consistent with and conform to the adopted
general plan of the municipality”. It is the intent of the Legislature that revisions to the
General Plan must occur prior to, not simultaneous with, zoning and rezonings. This is an
important process as it protects the integrity of the General Plan and the processes
involved in its revision, including (but not at all limited to), ongoing public notice and
participation.
Exceptions to this requirement have not occurred and do not apply here.
Scheduling of a hearing agenda following action on the General Plan is not occurring
here, as the Verdin Minor General Plan Amendment Submittal (Case No. GPA-DSTV-1-
18-2) admits that “[t]his Amendment is being processed concurrently with applications to
change the zoning on the Property…” 36 Finally, there has been no indication that
developer Taylor Morrison has ever requested a written waiver of this explicit
requirement.
In addition, the General Plan Amendment Planning Process makes clear that the
contents of a General Plan Amendment hearing and a Rezoning hearing are quite
different. 37 For instance, certain zoning issues are “not appropriate for discussion” at a
General Plan Amendment hearing, including setbacks, elevation, open space, amenities,
and other topics. Simultaneous consideration of all of these applications, and
consideration of all of these topics at one single hearing, is inappropriate and contrary to
Phoenix City policies and Arizona laws governing municipal planning.
All Procedures for the Cases Must Be Complied With
On December 7, 2021 and December 9, 2021, the four applications were
presented and discussed at the Desert View Village Planning Committee and the North
Gateway Village Planning Committee regular monthly meetings, respectively. 38 On
See Verdin Major General Plan Amendment Submittal (December 17, 2021), p.5 (obtained via
public records request).
See FN 34 at 2-3.
See Desert View Village Planning Committee – Notice of Results (December 7, 2021); see
North Gateway Village Planning Committee – Notice of Results (December 9, 2021).
Page 425
December 17, 2021 and after these informational meetings, the General Plan
Amendment Application was resubmitted to the Planning & Development Department (the
first submittal having occurred over three years prior). 39 However, no further presentation
and discussion of this resubmittal occurred prior to voting meetings.
Neighborhood notification and meetings are also a requirement of the General
Plan Amendment process. Specifically, applicants are required to meet with property
owners within 600 feet of the subject site to present the proposal, and attempt to address
resident concerns. Furthermore, the General Plan Amendment Process Guide 40 requires:
“The results of that meeting shall be summarized and forwarded to the
village planner in whose village the case is located. No hearings shall be
scheduled without submittal of the following information:
x Date, time, and location of the meeting
x Number of participants
x Issues that arose during the meeting
x Plan to resolve the issues, if possible”
It is unclear whether this requirement has been met. Furthermore, if such a
meeting has occurred, it is important to determine whether the meeting occurred prior or
subsequent to the major resubmittal in December 2021. This is critical. Fundamental to
the planning process are ample, advance public notice allowing time for meaningful
review, engagement and participation.
For reasons stated above, the bundling of these four cases (rezoning applications,
request to amend the General Plan, and Planned Unit Development) is improper and
prohibited by the City of Phoenix’s own policy. Progression of these cases must stop on
this basis alone.
Public Review Opportunities Have Been Insufficient
The City of Phoenix Staff Report for Verdin PUD was not finalized until March 9,
2022, and was not posted on the Planned Unit Development Case List until just before
the North Gateway Village Planning Committee voting meeting on March 10, 2022. 41
Similarly, the City of Phoenix Staff Analysis for the General Plan Amendment was not
finalized until March 9, 2022. 42 Bafflingly, it is posted on the General Plan Amendment
See FN 35.
See FN 34.
See Staff Report Z-62-18-2 – Verdin PUD dated March 9, 2022.
See Staff Analysis GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 dated March 9, 2022.
Page 426
Case List under the year “2018” and not under “2022”, making it highly unlikely that an
interested citizen would easily be able to locate and review it (if they even knew it was
there). The City of Phoenix Staff Report for the Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment was
also not finalized until March 9, 2022. 43 Also bafflingly, it is posted on the Rezoning &
Text Amendment Case List under the year “2018” and not under “2022.” This stymies the
good-faith efforts of even the most persistent interested citizen, and certainly stifles public
participation.
Additionally, revisions to the Verdin PUD Narrative have repeatedly been
resubmitted by developer Taylor Morrison over the past three months. The most recent
resubmission was on March 3, 2022, a few short days before the North Gateway Village
Planning Committee voting meeting on March 10, 2022. 44 No notification of this updated
draft (or the specific changes it contains) was received in advance of the March 10th
meeting.
No notification or alert was ever received that these reports or updates were even
available, leaving no time for any meaningful public review (or even awareness of their
existence) prior to the first Village voting meeting. This is made more egregious by the
fact that there are significant public concerns with this development, which have been
repeatedly raised throughout the years. In fact, public concern about this project has been
expressed since the project was first proposed as “MacEwen 480” in 2018. 45 As the City
is likely aware, the organization known as Save Our Sonoran Preserve was formed by
residents in response to these very threats from this project and SOS has fiercely
advocated for protection of the Preserve and DMOD Overlay ever since.
Although the Public Meeting materials included allotted time for “Public
Comments”, this opportunity is not meaningful, when the public is not given sufficient time
to review the relevant documents in advance of key voting meetings. Proper time for
public participation and notice are required components of the public process for all of
these cases. As you know, A.R.S. § 9-461.06(C) directs municipalities to provide for
“effective, early and continuous public participation” with respect to General Plan
amendment processes.
See Staff Report – Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Z-TA-5-18-2 dated March 9, 2022.
See Verdin PUD Narrative.
See “1,420 homes may line 9,671 acres of preserved north Phoenix desert” (AZCentral,
January 12, 2022); see “Hikers upset home builder may redevelop part of North Phoenix desert”
(AZFamily, February 28, 2022); see “Preserve at odds with high density housing” (Sonoran News,
May 15, 2019); see “Outdoor enthusiasts blast plan for 1,400 homes near Phoenix Sonoran
Preserve” (AZCentral, May 14, 2019).
Page 427
Disclosing key materials on the same day as scheduled decision-making meetings
does not allow for meaningful public review and participation, and unfortunately, whether
or not intended, diminishes its importance. We sincerely hope that this will no longer be
the case moving forward.
III. CONCLUSION
The robust protections developed and codified in the Desert Maintenance Overlay
District have stood unaltered for the past 21 years. Erosion of these protections, if allowed
once, may not stop. Simply put, the Desert Maintenance Overlay District must be
preserved intact and not modified.
What we are asking for here is not radical. PMPC does not oppose a reasonable
development on the McEwen Ranch LLC property consistent with current development
standards and zoning requirements. Phoenix has already spoken with the approval of the
DMOD Overlay, which reflects the years of hard work put into development of the DMOD
Overlay by so many dedicated citizens and professionals.
Anything short of preserving the DMOD Overlay as-is will seriously degrade fragile
desert ecosystems in the area, sever connections between the Preserves, and set a
dangerous where developers can easily bypass important protections for our unique
landscapes across Phoenix.
Yours Truly,
Dr. Patrick McMullen, PhD, President
Phoenix Mountain Preservation Council, Inc.
Email: pmpcaz@gmail.com
CC: Director, Phoenix City Planning & Development
Phoenix City Planning & Development Department (zoning@phoenix.gov)
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Executive Board, Phoenix Mountain Preservation Council, Inc.
Page 428
From: Sonoran Preserve
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: Re: Message to VPC Members
Date: Thursday, April 7, 2022 3:43:19 PM
Hi Julianna,
I wanted to say thank you for all your assistance for the past couple years on this project. Obviously, I’m a bit
heartbroken and feel very gutted about the result of the vote, in particular the removal of the Desert Character
Overlay, something that I have felt so passionately about.
I was hoping to post a recap to our members again so if you could forward the minutes when you get a
chance that would be appreciated.
Also can you forward the below letter to Desert View VPC members:
Dear Desert View VPC,
First, I want to thank you for all your attention to the MacEwan 480/Verdin project over the past several
years. It’s hard to believe that we were discussing this case since 2018. It is taxing enough for me to sit in on
those meetings every once in a while and you fine people do it for our community once a month! So thank
you for your time and service.
Second, obviously I’m a bit heartbroken and feel very gutted over the result of the vote this week. I put so
much time and effort in defending the Preserve and it’s zoning laws.
It seemed that back in 2018 and 2019 everyone was in unison (both Committee members and 82 letters that
you received in opposition) about how massive this up zone was, the location of this up zone and the asking
of the removal of limit line and the Desert Character overlay. It was sad to see peoples opinions changes.
Perhaps we’re all tired of hearing about it.
At any rate, please consider me an ally in helping preserve open places like the Sonoran Preserve and it’s
zoning laws. For me it’s the heart of what make Arizona and our beautiful village truly unique.
Sincerely,
Dr. Gary Kirkilas
708-369-4566
Save Our Sonoran Preserve
On Apr 5, 2022, at 8:20 AM, Julianna Pierre
Thank you for sending this over, Gary. I’ll make sure I have this updated version available.
Thank you,
Julianna Pierre, Planner II – Village Planner
Office: 602-534-5829
ʇ Planning & Development Department
Long Range Planning
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Mission: Planning, Development and Preservation for a Better Phoenix
Page 429
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Verdin development proposal
Date: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 8:30:53 AM
Please add to the public record.
From: Ron Orozco
Date: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 8:25 AM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Verdin development proposal
Dear Councilman Waring,
I’m writing to you today because I know you are a man of integrity and a man of the people. I had
the pleasure of meeting you a few times when you were the state senator from my district. I am
deeply concerned about the proposal Verdin development has on the table to basically ignore the
Desert Character Overlay District standards for development on lands adjoining the Sonoran
Preserve. This is literally my backyard now and the impact to the ecosystem of overdevelopment
would be irreversible. I am an avid trail runner with great respect for our desert home. This proposal
is a very bad idea and in direct conflict of the standards put in place to prevent overdevelopment. No
amount of ‘planning’ to build ‘conforming with the natural environment’ can make up for doubling
or tripling the number of homes in this area, and with future development almost assured, sets a
very bad precedent. In fact, it’s hypocritical. I urge you to do the right thing and deny this proposal.
Keep this area zoned as it was intended, and protect the environment and the livelihood of all who
currently live here and enjoy the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve.
Sincerely,
Ron Orozco
District 2 Republican
602-469-0715
Sent from my iPhone
*******
Page 430
Attachment H
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
May 5, 2022
ITEM NO: 8
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:
Application #: Z-62-18-2 (Verdin PUD) (Companion Cases GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, Z-75-18-
2, and Z-TA-5-18-2)
Location: Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive
From: S-1 DCOD, RE-35 DCOD, and S-1
To: PUD DCOD (Pending PUD) and PUD
Acreage: 488.63
Proposal: Planned Unit Development to allow single-family residential
Applicant: Taylor Morrison/Arizona, Inc.
Owner: MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Representative: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Desert View 11/6/2018 Information only.
North Gateway 11/8/2018 Information only.
Desert View 4/2/2019 Information only.
Desert View 12/7/2021 Information only.
North Gateway 12/9/2021 Information only.
North Gateway 3/10/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation with a modification.
Vote: 4-1.
Desert View 4/5/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation with modifications and additional
stipulations. Vote: 10-1.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the staff memo dated May 5, 2022.
Motion Discussion: N/A
Motion details: Commissioner Simon made a MOTION to approve Z-62-18-2, per the staff
memo dated May 5, 2022.
Maker: Simon
Second: Busching
Vote: 7-1 (Perez)
Absent: Gaynor
Opposition Present: Yes
Findings:
1. The proposed PUD is located directly adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve and includes
standards that ensure appropriate transitions from the development to adjacent
preserve areas.
Page 431
2. The proposal balances the need for additional housing, while retaining and preserving
the desert landscape throughout the development, as outlined in the North Land Use
Plan and Sonoran Preserve Master Plan.
3. The proposal includes several development standards, such as increased open edge
conditions, increased common area, and design guidelines that exceed conventional
Zoning Ordinance standards.
Stipulations:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Sendero Foothills VERDIN PUD reflecting
the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and
Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request. The
updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the Development Narrative
date stamped November 29, 2021 MARCH 3, 2022, as modified by the following
stipulations:
a. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO REFLECT A
MAXIMUM OVERALL UNIT COUNT OF 1,250 UNITS AND A MAXIMUM
OVERALL DENSITY OF 2.6 UNITS PER ACRE.. PAGES 6, 8, 26, AND 28:
REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE MAXIMUM DENSITY TO 2.6
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
b. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO REMOVE
THE SMALL LOT (SFR-3) LAND USE DISTRICT. PAGES 6, 8, 26, AND 28:
REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS TO
1,250 DWELLING UNITS.
c. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO REFLECT A
MINIMUM 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT PROVIDED ALONG THE
EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE VERDIN PROPERTY TO PROVIDE A
TRANSITION TO THE CAVE CREEK WASH CORRIDOR. THE OPEN
SPACE TRACT SHALL BE CONSIDERED A CERTIFIED AREA TYPE “B” –
NATURAL REVEGETATED AREA WITH PLANT MATERIALS FROM THE
VERDIN PUD PLANT LIST: GREEN LIST. PAGES 23, 26, 28, 29, 35, 36, 59,
63, 75, 134, 135, AND 136: REMOVE ALL REFERENCES TO THE “SINGLE-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL – SMALL LOT (SFR-3)” LAND USE DISTRICT. UNIT
COUNTS AND PERCENTAGES RELATED TO THIS REMOVAL SHALL BE
UPDATED ACCORDINGLY.
d. PAGES 20, 52, 61, 102, AND 113: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE
WIDTH OF THE MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT ALONG THE MESQUITE
WASH CORRIDOR TO 30-FEET-WIDE.
e. PAGES 51, 71, 75, 76, 83, 86, 87, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 119,
AND 121: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE “APPROVED PLANT
PALETTE” TO “PLANT PALETTE”.
f. PAGES 8-22, SECTION 2. LAND USE PLAN, AND PAGES 97-123, SECTION
9. CERTIFIED OPEN SPACE DESIGN GUIDELINES: ADD LANGUAGE
REGARDING CONVEYANCE OF APPROXIMATELY 16 ACRES
ADDRESSED IN STIPULATION NO. 8. THERE SHALL BE A PROVISION
FOR BOTH ON SITE OPEN SPACE AND THE DEDICATED 16 ACRES TO
COUNT TOWARDS TOTAL OPEN SPACE.
Page 432
g. PAGE 16, OFF-SITE CONNECTIVITY: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING
PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS EASEMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE MESQUITE
WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS, PER
STIPULATION NO. 6. THE SECTION SHALL SPECIFICALLY NOTE THAT
THE ACCESS EASEMENTS WILL ENSURE PERMANENT PUBLIC ACCESS
AND RESTRICT UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS THROUGH
THE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY TO THE SONORAN PRESERVE.
h Page 23, Section 1.d.Accessory uses.(1): Revise to read, “permanent and/or
d. temporary alcoholic beverage and/or food sales and/or consumption;”
i. PAGE 35, SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS TABLE: ADD A ROW AFTER MAX. DWELLING UNIT DENSITY
THAT READS “MAXIMUM UNITS: 1,250 DWELLING UNITS FOR THE
ENTIRE PUD AREA”.
j. PAGES 36-37, SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS TABLE: ADD A FOOTNOTE THAT REFERS TO THE
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL ALLOCATION TABLE IN SECTION 4.C.
(REGULATORY STANDARDS & LAND USE DISTRICTS – DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS) FOR THE MAXIMUM UNIT COUNTS FOR EACH
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.
k. PAGE 41, SECTION 6.1: REVISE TO READ, “WHEN NOT PROHIBITED BY
CITY CODE, SECTION 31-13, PRIMARY ORNAMENTAL ENTRIES NO
HIGHER THAN 16-FEET ARE ALLOWED…”
l. PAGE 41, SECTION 6.3.A: ADD THE FOLLOWING SENTENCE UNDER THE
EXISTING SENTENCE: “ANY WALLS OR FENCING ALONG A PRESERVE
EDGE/MCFCD PROPERTY BOUNDARY, OTHER THAN WALLS OR
FENCING FOR INDIVIDUAL RESIDENTIAL LOTS, SHALL BE COMPRISED
OF THE BARRIER FENCING TYPE, WHICH ARE DESIGNED WITH
SUFFICIENT OPENINGS TO ALLOW THE REGULAR PASSAGE OF
WILDLIFE.”
m. PAGE 42, SECTION 6.3.B: REVISE THE REFERENCE TO ‘A MAXIMUM 6-
FOOT, 4-INCH HIGH FULL VIEW FENCING” TO ‘A MAXIMUM 5-FOOT HIGH
FULL VIEW FENCING’.
n. PAGE 46, SECTION 6.6: CHANGE ‘14 FEET’ TO ‘12 FEET’.
l.o. PAGES 52-53, SECTION 2.C: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING PUBLIC TRAIL
ACCESS EASEMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE MESQUITE WASH
CORRIDOR TRAIL AND COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS, PER STIPULATION
NO. 6. THE SECTION SHOULD SPECIFICALLY NOTE THAT THE ACCESS
EASEMENTS WILL ENSURE PERMANENT PUBLIC ACCESS AND
RESTRICT UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS THROUGH THE
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY TO THE SONORAN PRESERVE.
p. PAGE 79-80, SECTION 5.A, LAST BULLET POINT: ADD THE FOLLOWING
AFTER THE FIRST SENTENCE: “THE USE OF RETAINING WALLS IN
EXCESS OF 4 FEET IS DISCOURAGED AND SHOULD BE LIMITED TO
Page 433
LOCATIONS WHERE NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE SPECIFIC SITE
TOPOGRAPHY.”
m.q. PAGES 90-91, SECTION 6.H: DELETE “CHILOPSIS LINEARIS – DESERT
WILLOW” TREE FROM THE GREEN LIST AND ADD IT TO THE YELLOW
LIST TREES ON PAGE 91.
n.r. PAGES 90 AND 92, SECTION 6.H: DELETE “CELTIS RETICULATA –
NETLEAF HACKBERRY” SHRUB FROM THE YELLOW LIST AND ADD IT
TO THE GREEN LIST SHRUBS ON PAGE 90.
o.s. PAGE 101, CERTIFIED AREA OPEN SPACE TYPES EXHIBIT. UPDATE
THE EXHIBIT TO INCLUDE THE 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT THAT
WILL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE SITE AS
A CERTIFIED AREA TYPE “B” – NATURAL REVEGETATED AREA.
p.t. PAGE 105-108, SECTION 1.D.2: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING THE
MINIMUM 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT THAT WILL BE PROVIDED
ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE SITE TO PROVIDE A
TRANSITION TO THE CAVE CREEK WASH CORRIDOR. EXPLAIN THAT
THE AREA’S PLANT MATERIAL WILL BE FROM THE PLANT PALETTE
GREEN LIST.
q.u. PAGES 119 AND 121, 1.E. PLANT AND WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP MATRIX,
PLANT PALETTE: GREEN LIST: REMOVE THE IMAGE AND
INFORMATION REGARDING “CHILOPSIS LINEARIS – DESERT WILLOW”
AND ADD TO THE PLANT PALETTE: YELLOW LIST ON PAGE 121.
r.v. PAGES 119 AND 122, 1.E. PLANT AND WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP MATRIX,
PLANT PALETTE: YELLOW LIST: REMOVE THE IMAGE INFORMATION
REGARDING “CELTIS RETICULATA – NETLEAF HACKBERRY” AND ADD
TO THE PLANT PALETTE: GREEN LIST ON PAGE 119.
s.w. PAGE 123, SECTION 10.1.B: REVISE TO READ, “THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT
FOR PRIMARY ORNAMENTAL ENTRY SIGN LETTERING AND COPY IS 16
FEET…”
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is
reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall provide signal warrant analysis for
development access points along Sonoran Desert Drive as well as 7th Street and
Dove Valley Road. The developer will be responsible for all additional dedications
and/or roadway and signal improvements as identified by the approved study.
3. The developer shall submit Master Street Design and Phasing Plans for each
Development Unit, as required by Section 636, Planned Community District (PCD), of
the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
4. All designated public roadways shall meet the City of Phoenix Storm Water Design
Manual Standards for wash crossings.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping,
Page 434
and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.
6. THE DEVELOPER SHALL WORK WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX PARKS AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS EASEMENTS
FOR THE MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS
THAT PROVIDE CONNECTION TO THE SONORAN PRESERVE AS DEPICTED ON
EXHIBIT 6, PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PLAN, IN THE PUD DOCUMENT
DEVELOPMENT NARRATIVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE PARKS
AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. THE PUBLIC ACCESS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO RESTRICT
UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS, AS APPROVED BY THE PARKS
AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. THE LOCATION AND DESIGN OF TRAIL CONNECTIONS SHALL
BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX PARKS AND RECREATION
DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
7. A MINIMUM 12-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL (MUT) SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
WITHIN AN AVERAGE 30-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT (MUTE)
ALONG THE MESQUITE WASH IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 429 OF THE
CITY OF PHOENIX MAG SUPPLEMENTAL DETAIL, AS MODIFIED TO ADDRESS
WASH CORRIDOR CONSTRAINTS AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
8. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONVEY APPROXIMATELY 16 ACRES LOCATED AT
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE WITHIN THE EROSION HAZARD
SETBACK AREA ALONG THE CAVE CREEK WASH CORRIDOR, AS GENERALLY
SHOWN ON EXHIBIT 11 OF THE DEVELOPMENT NARRATIVE, TO THE CITY OF
PHOENIX FOR INCLUSION IN THE SONORAN PRESERVE, AS MODIFIED AND
APPROVED BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE FINAL ACREAGE AND
CONFIGURATION OF THE PROPERTY TO BE CONVEYED, ALONG WITH TIMING
OF THE CONVEYANCE, SHALL BE MUTUALLY AGREED UPON BY THE
DEVELOPER, THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT, AND PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
9 If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
8. conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to clearing
and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
10 If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the Phase I
9. data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified archaeologist,
determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall conduct
Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
11 In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
10. developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33- foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
12. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER SHALL
EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE WAIVER SHALL
BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE AND
Page 435
DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REZONING APPLICATION
FILE FOR RECORD.
13. THE DEVELOPER SHALL NOTIFY THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS BY EMAIL A
MINIMUM OF 15 DAYS PRIOR TO ANY PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN REVIEW
MEETINGS WITH THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,
PLANNING HEARING OFFICER REQUESTS TO MODIFY STIPULATIONS, OR ANY
ZONING ADJUSTMENT REQUESTS. THE NOTICE SHALL INCLUDE THE DATE,
TIME, AND LOCATION OF THE MEETING/HEARING.
A. DR. GARY KIRKILAS: GARYKIRKILAS@GMAIL.COM
B. MEMBERS OF THE PHOENIX SONORAN PRESERVE AND MOUNTAIN
PARKS/PRESERVES COMMITTEE
C VASHTI “TICE” SUPPLEE: VSUPPLEE25@GMAIL.COM
14. APPROVAL OF THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CONDITIONED
UPON THE FINAL EXECUTION OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY AND THE DEVELOPER WITHIN 24 MONTHS OF CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF THIS CHANGE OF ZONE. ADDITIONALLY, THE DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT SHALL BE EXECUTED PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
AND ISSUANCE OF ANY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PERMITS. THE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SHALL AT A MINIMUM OUTLINE THE
REQUIREMENTS FOR INITIAL IMPROVEMENTS TO SONORAN DESERT DRIVE,
AS WELL AS FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS FOR THE ULTIMATE BUILDOUT OF
SONORAN DESERT DRIVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE STREET
TRANSPORTATION AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS.
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.
Page 436
ATTACHMENT I
To: City of Phoenix Planning Commission Date: May 5, 2022
From: Racelle Escolar, AICP
Principal Planner
Subject: ITEM NO. 8 (Z-62-18-2) – VERDIN PUD – SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE
24TH STREET ALIGNMENT AND SONORAN DESERT DRIVE
The purpose of this is memo is to recommend additional stipulations and convey additional
correspondence that has been received regarding this case and its companion cases.
Rezoning Case No. Z-62-18-2 is a request to rezone 488.63 acres from S-1 DCOD
(Ranch or Farm Residence, Desert Character Overlay District), RE-35 (Single-Family
Residence District) DCOD, and S-1. The requested zoning is PUD (Planned Unit
Development) DCOD (Pending PUD) and PUD for the Verdin PUD, to allow single-
family residential.
The North Gateway Village Planning Committee (VPC) heard this request on March 10,
2022, and recommended approval with modifications by a 4-1 vote. The Desert View
VPC heard this request on April 5, 2022, and recommended approval with modifications
and additional stipulations by a 10-1 vote.
The applicant has agreed to reduce the maximum wall height standards in the PUD
Narrative and to require that any walls or fencing on the preserve edge have sufficient
openings to allow the passage of wildlife. This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 1.l, m, n,
and p.
The applicant has also agreed to notifying specific individuals should there be future public
hearings applicable to the PUD area. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 13.
The Sonoran Desert Drive Roadway Corridor, including Sonoran Desert Drive from North
Valley Pkwy to Cave Creek Road and Dove Valley Road from 22nd Avenue to Sonoran
Desert Drive, will become a critical transportation conduit connecting northwest and
northeast Phoenix across the Sonoran Desert Preserve. Roadway improvements will be
needed within the corridor to ensure continued safe travel conditions as future new
development occurs in north Phoenix. Staff is recommending a stipulation to require a
development agreement that will set forth the terms by which Verdin will contribute a fair
share toward the necessary roadway improvements. This is addressed in Stipulation No.
14.
Enclosed with this memo are three letter of support and eight letters of opposition,
including a petition.
Page 437
Z-62-18-2 Planning Commission Backup Memo
May 5, 2022
Staff recommends approval, subject to the stipulations below:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Sendero Foothills VERDIN PUD
reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval
of this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with
the Development Narrative date stamped November 29, 2021 MARCH 3,
2022, as modified by the following stipulations:
a. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REFLECT A MAXIMUM OVERALL UNIT COUNT OF 1,250 UNITS AND
A MAXIMUM OVERALL DENSITY OF 2.6 UNITS PER ACRE.. PAGES
6, 8, 26, AND 28: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE MAXIMUM
DENSITY TO 2.6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
b. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REMOVE THE SMALL LOT (SFR-3) LAND USE DISTRICT. PAGES 6,
8, 26, AND 28: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE MAXIMUM
NUMBER OF UNITS TO 1,250 DWELLING UNITS.
c. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REFLECT A MINIMUM 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT PROVIDED
ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE VERDIN PROPERTY
TO PROVIDE A TRANSITION TO THE CAVE CREEK WASH
CORRIDOR. THE OPEN SPACE TRACT SHALL BE CONSIDERED A
CERTIFIED AREA TYPE “B” – NATURAL REVEGETATED AREA
WITH PLANT MATERIALS FROM THE VERDIN PUD PLANT LIST:
GREEN LIST. PAGES 23, 26, 28, 29, 35, 36, 59, 63, 75, 134, 135, AND
136: REMOVE ALL REFERENCES TO THE “SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL – SMALL LOT (SFR-3)” LAND USE DISTRICT. UNIT
COUNTS AND PERCENTAGES RELATED TO THIS REMOVAL
SHALL BE UPDATED ACCORDINGLY.
d. PAGES 20, 52, 61, 102, AND 113: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO
THE WIDTH OF THE MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT ALONG THE
MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TO 30-FEET-WIDE.
e. PAGES 51, 71, 75, 76, 83, 86, 87, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110,
119, AND 121: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE “APPROVED
PLANT PALETTE” TO “PLANT PALETTE”.
f. PAGES 8-22, SECTION 2. LAND USE PLAN, AND PAGES 97-123,
SECTION 9. CERTIFIED OPEN SPACE DESIGN GUIDELINES: ADD
LANGUAGE REGARDING CONVEYANCE OF APPROXIMATELY 16
ACRES ADDRESSED IN STIPULATION NO. 8. THERE SHALL BE A
PROVISION FOR BOTH ON SITE OPEN SPACE AND THE
DEDICATED 16 ACRES TO COUNT TOWARDS TOTAL OPEN
SPACE.
Page 438
Z-62-18-2 Planning Commission Backup Memo
May 5, 2022
g. PAGE 16, OFF-SITE CONNECTIVITY: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING
PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS EASEMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE
MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND COMMUNITY PASEO
PATHS, PER STIPULATION NO. 6. THE SECTION SHALL
SPECIFICALLY NOTE THAT THE ACCESS EASEMENTS WILL
ENSURE PERMANENT PUBLIC ACCESS AND RESTRICT
UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS THROUGH THE
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY TO THE SONORAN PRESERVE.
h Page 23, Section 1.d.Accessory uses.(1): Revise to read, “permanent
d. and/or temporary alcoholic beverage and/or food sales and/or
consumption;”
i. PAGE 35, SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS TABLE: ADD A ROW AFTER MAX. DWELLING UNIT
DENSITY THAT READS “MAXIMUM UNITS: 1,250 DWELLING UNITS
FOR THE ENTIRE PUD AREA”.
j. PAGES 36-37, SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE: ADD A FOOTNOTE THAT
REFERS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL ALLOCATION TABLE IN
SECTION 4.C. (REGULATORY STANDARDS & LAND USE
DISTRICTS – DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS) FOR THE MAXIMUM
UNIT COUNTS FOR EACH DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.
k. PAGE 41, SECTION 6.1: REVISE TO READ, “WHEN NOT
PROHIBITED BY CITY CODE, SECTION 31-13, PRIMARY
ORNAMENTAL ENTRIES NO HIGHER THAN 16-FEET ARE
ALLOWED…”
l. PAGE 41, SECTION 6.3.A: ADD THE FOLLOWING SENTENCE
UNDER THE EXISTING SENTENCE: “ANY WALLS OR FENCING
ALONG A PRESERVE EDGE/MCFCD PROPERTY BOUNDARY,
OTHER THAN WALLS OR FENCING FOR INDIVIDUAL
RESIDENTIAL LOTS, SHALL BE COMPRISED OF THE BARRIER
FENCING TYPE, WHICH ARE DESIGNED WITH SUFFICIENT
OPENINGS TO ALLOW THE REGULAR PASSAGE OF WILDLIFE.”
m. PAGE 42, SECTION 6.3.B: REVISE THE REFERENCE TO ‘A
MAXIMUM 6-FOOT, 4-INCH HIGH FULL VIEW FENCING” TO ‘A
MAXIMUM 5-FOOT HIGH FULL VIEW FENCING’.
n. PAGE 46, SECTION 6.6: CHANGE ‘14 FEET’ TO ‘12 FEET’.
l.o. PAGES 52-53, SECTION 2.C: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING PUBLIC
TRAIL ACCESS EASEMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE MESQUITE
WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS, PER
Page 439
Z-62-18-2 Planning Commission Backup Memo
May 5, 2022
STIPULATION NO. 6. THE SECTION SHOULD SPECIFICALLY NOTE
THAT THE ACCESS EASEMENTS WILL ENSURE PERMANENT
PUBLIC ACCESS AND RESTRICT UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR
VEHICLE ACCESS THROUGH THE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY TO
THE SONORAN PRESERVE.
p. PAGE 79-80, SECTION 5.A, LAST BULLET POINT: ADD THE
FOLLOWING AFTER THE FIRST SENTENCE: “THE USE OF
RETAINING WALLS IN EXCESS OF 4 FEET IS DISCOURAGED AND
SHOULD BE LIMITED TO LOCATIONS WHERE NECESSARY TO
ACCOMMODATE SPECIFIC SITE TOPOGRAPHY.”
m.q. PAGES 90-91, SECTION 6.H: DELETE “CHILOPSIS LINEARIS –
DESERT WILLOW” TREE FROM THE GREEN LIST AND ADD IT TO
THE YELLOW LIST TREES ON PAGE 91.
n.r. PAGES 90 AND 92, SECTION 6.H: DELETE “CELTIS RETICULATA –
NETLEAF HACKBERRY” SHRUB FROM THE YELLOW LIST AND
ADD IT TO THE GREEN LIST SHRUBS ON PAGE 90.
o.s. PAGE 101, CERTIFIED AREA OPEN SPACE TYPES EXHIBIT.
UPDATE THE EXHIBIT TO INCLUDE THE 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE
TRACT THAT WILL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE EASTERN
BOUNDARY OF THE SITE AS A CERTIFIED AREA TYPE “B” –
NATURAL REVEGETATED AREA.
p.t. PAGE 105-108, SECTION 1.D.2: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING THE
MINIMUM 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT THAT WILL BE PROVIDED
ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE SITE TO PROVIDE A
TRANSITION TO THE CAVE CREEK WASH CORRIDOR. EXPLAIN
THAT THE AREA’S PLANT MATERIAL WILL BE FROM THE PLANT
PALETTE GREEN LIST.
q.u. PAGES 119 AND 121, 1.E. PLANT AND WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP
MATRIX, PLANT PALETTE: GREEN LIST: REMOVE THE IMAGE
AND INFORMATION REGARDING “CHILOPSIS LINEARIS – DESERT
WILLOW” AND ADD TO THE PLANT PALETTE: YELLOW LIST ON
PAGE 121.
r.v. PAGES 119 AND 122, 1.E. PLANT AND WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP
MATRIX, PLANT PALETTE: YELLOW LIST: REMOVE THE IMAGE
INFORMATION REGARDING “CELTIS RETICULATA – NETLEAF
HACKBERRY” AND ADD TO THE PLANT PALETTE: GREEN LIST ON
PAGE 119.
s.w. PAGE 123, SECTION 10.1.B: REVISE TO READ, “THE MAXIMUM
HEIGHT FOR PRIMARY ORNAMENTAL ENTRY SIGN LETTERING
AND COPY IS 16 FEET…”
Page 440
Z-62-18-2 Planning Commission Backup Memo
May 5, 2022
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study
is reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall provide signal warrant
analysis for development access points along Sonoran Desert Drive as well as
7th Street and Dove Valley Road. The developer will be responsible for all
additional dedications and/or roadway and signal improvements as identified
by the approved study.
3. The developer shall submit Master Street Design and Phasing Plans for each
Development Unit, as required by Section 636, Planned Community District
(PCD), of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
4. All designated public roadways shall meet the City of Phoenix Storm Water
Design Manual Standards for wash crossings.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping, and other incidentals as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.
6. THE DEVELOPER SHALL WORK WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX PARKS
AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS
EASEMENTS FOR THE MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND
COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS THAT PROVIDE CONNECTION TO THE
SONORAN PRESERVE AS DEPICTED ON EXHIBIT 6, PEDESTRIAN
CIRCULATION PLAN, IN THE PUD DOCUMENT DEVELOPMENT
NARRATIVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE PARKS AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. THE PUBLIC ACCESS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO
RESTRICT UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS, AS APPROVED
BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE LOCATION AND DESIGN OF TRAIL
CONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
7. A MINIMUM 12-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL (MUT) SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED WITHIN AN AVERAGE 30-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL
EASEMENT (MUTE) ALONG THE MESQUITE WASH IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION 429 OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX MAG SUPPLEMENTAL
DETAIL, AS MODIFIED TO ADDRESS WASH CORRIDOR CONSTRAINTS
AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
8. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONVEY APPROXIMATELY 16 ACRES
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE WITHIN THE
EROSION HAZARD SETBACK AREA ALONG THE CAVE CREEK WASH
Page 441
Z-62-18-2 Planning Commission Backup Memo
May 5, 2022
CORRIDOR, AS GENERALLY SHOWN ON EXHIBIT 11 OF THE
DEVELOPMENT NARRATIVE, TO THE CITY OF PHOENIX FOR INCLUSION
IN THE SONORAN PRESERVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE FINAL ACREAGE AND
CONFIGURATION OF THE PROPERTY TO BE CONVEYED, ALONG WITH
TIMING OF THE CONVEYANCE, SHALL BE MUTUALLY AGREED UPON BY
THE DEVELOPER, THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT, AND
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
9 If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
8. conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
10 If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
9. Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
11 In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
10. developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
12. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER
SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE
WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDER'S OFFICE AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED
IN THE REZONING APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.
13. THE DEVELOPER SHALL NOTIFY THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS BY
EMAIL A MINIMUM OF 15 DAYS PRIOR TO ANY PRELIMINARY SITE
PLAN REVIEW MEETINGS WITH THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, PLANNING HEARING OFFICER REQUESTS TO MODIFY
STIPULATIONS, OR ANY ZONING ADJUSTMENT REQUESTS. THE
NOTICE SHALL INCLUDE THE DATE, TIME AND LOCATION OF THE
MEETING/HEARING.
A. DR. GARY KIRKILAS: GARYKIRKILAS@GMAIL.COM
B. MEMBERS OF THE PHOENIX SONORAN PRESERVE AND
MOUNTAIN PARKS/PRESERVES COMMITTEE
C VASHTI “TICE” SUPPLEE: VSUPPLEE25@GMAIL.COM
14. APPROVAL OF THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE
CONDITIONED UPON THE FINAL EXECUTION OF A DEVELOPMENT
Page 442
Z-62-18-2 Planning Commission Backup Memo
May 5, 2022
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE DEVELOPER WITHIN 24
MONTHS OF CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THIS CHANGE OF
ZONE. ADDITIONALLY, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SHALL BE
EXECUTED PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF
ANY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PERMITS. THE DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT SHALL AT A MINIMUM OUTLINE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR
INITIAL IMPROVEMENTS TO SONORAN DESERT DRIVE, AS WELL AS
FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS FOR THE ULTIMATE BUILDOUT OF
SONORAN DESERT DRIVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE
STREET TRANSPORTATION AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENTS.
Enclosures:
Correspondence (80 pages)
Page 443
LW VENTURE, LLC
9393 N 90th St., Ste. 102, Box 125
Scottsdale, AZ 85258
Telephone (480) 305-4609
Cameron@mac-cre.com
April 27, 2022
Via Email : julianna.pierre@phoenix.gov
Ms. Julianna Pierre
City Village Planner
Re: Taylor Morrison Arizona, Inc.
Case Nos.: Z-62-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2,
Z-TA-5-18-2 & Z-75-18-2
Dear Ms. Pierre:
As the new owner of Tatum Ranch Crossing, we support approval of the zoning changes
being requested by Taylor Morrison for the master planned residential community to be known
DV³9HUGLQ´
Please direct all future correspondence and/or notices to my email or physical address
mentioned above.
Sincerely,
LW Venture, LLC
An Arizona Limited Liability Company
By: NCW Property A, LLC,
Property Manager
_______________________________
Cameron Wilson
DCL/bgr
cc: Ellie Brundige
Gammage & Burnham, P.L.C.
Email: ebrundige@gblaw.com
Page 444
From: PDD Zoning
To: Racelle Escolar
Cc: Julianna Pierre; Sarah Stockham; Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: FW: PMPC letters regarding Verdin zoning
Date: Monday, May 2, 2022 3:57:42 PM
Attachments: PMPC Cover Letter_Legal Research on DCOD_April 3 2022 (004).pdf
PMPC Letter to City of Phoenix re VERDIN Applications_Final Draft (004).pdf
Hello see below and attached.
Thank You
Leonor Valenzuela Secretary III
Planning and Development - Zoning Section
200 West Washington Street 2nd Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85003
From: libby@fivewest.com
Sent: May 2, 2022 3:03 PM
To: Alan Stephenson
Subject: PMPC letters regarding Verdin zoning
Our attached letters from Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council (PMPC) relate to the zoning
change request regarding the Verdin development.
Elizabeth (Libby) Goff
PMPC Secretary
Libby@fivewest.com
602-758-3062
Page 445
PMPC SUMMARY - APRIL 3, 2022
The Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, a 501(c)(4) non-profit organization charged
with the protection of the Phoenix Mountains Preserves write to you with our strong
support and encouragement to engage and monitor the Verdin Development of the 480
acres situated to the west of Cave Creek Wash and to the south of the Sonoran Parkway.
The Verdin location abuts to Sonoran Preserve.
The attached legal research conducted by the PMPC Attorney, lists our concerns and we
hope that you and City departments will continue to take them seriously and will apply the
sections of the zoning Ordinance that were written and included into the Ordinance to
protect these Preserve adjacencies and to ensure that the Preserves will remain available
to the public and enjoyable as well.
PMPC understands that Phoenix is a rapidly growing city and that large numbers of the
new population must be accommodated. A great effort was undertaken in past decades
to have the Sonoran Preserve acquired by the City at tax payer expense, with a large
effort by PMPC to identify and help to support the City efforts. We therefore are very
dedicated to keeping the Preserves available to the local citizens, and the Desert
Character Overlay continued and appreciated.
The Verdin Development planning team has taken important steps in the linking up of the
Sonoran Preserves, emphasis on desert plant maintenance, protection of plants and
animals, and meaningful public access to the Desert Preserves surrounding the new
Verdin development. What is needed is a more formal arrangement between the City of
Phoenix, Phoenix Citizens and the Verdin 480 Acre Development project team.
As a remembrance; On February 17, 1998, the [City] Council also voted unanimously to
adopt the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan and to move forward in acquiring this open
space. In doing so, the Council continues a time-honored precedent for protecting and
preserving desert open space within the city and for ensuring recreational access for our
citizens.”
PMPC is intensely interested in the pending development of the Verdin 480 acre site, as
it is an early project in the development of this corridor, and especially important for the
continued Desert character Overlay District enforcement.
Sincerely,
Patrick McMullen, PhD
Patrick McMullen, PhD
PMPC President
Page 446
March 31, 2022
Mayor Kate Gallego Phoenix City Councilmembers
Phoenix City Hall Phoenix City Hall
200 W. Washington St. 200 W. Washington St.
Phoenix, AZ 85003 Phoenix, AZ 85003
Re: Objections of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, Inc. (PMPC) to
the Four Applications Submitted for “Verdin” Development Proposal (GPA-
DSTV-1-18-2, Z-75-18-2, Z-TA-5-18-2 and Z-62-18-2)
Dear Mayor Gallego:
This letter is submitted by the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, Inc.
(PMPC) in opposition to the proposed Taylor Morrison “Verdin” housing development
project south of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th Street and 32nd Street alignments,
just west of Cave Creek Road in northern Phoenix (formerly “MacEwen 480”). We
understand that developer Taylor Morrison has filed several applications in furtherance
of this development including two zoning amendments, a General Plan Amendment, and
a Planned Unit Development application (hereinafter the “four applications”). 1 We
understand that these four applications were simultaneously approved by the North
Gateway Village Planning Committee on March 10, 2022 2, and the Desert View Village
Planning Committee is scheduled to meet on these four applications on April 5, 2022. 3
PMPC strongly objects to any actions, at any level, that would advance the four
applications as written, for reasons stated herein. First – the Desert Maintenance Overlay
District should not be modified but must remain intact, ensuring that washes, sensitive
species and their habitats, and the delicate desert ecosystem remain protected. The
rezoning is not simply a “technical clean-up” as the developer casually asserts, 4 but
rather, this rezoning would be an unprecedented rollback of protections carefully
researched and thoughtfully added to the Phoenix Zoning Code for this specific area
decades ago – protections that were specifically adopted to protect this desert area from
the very type of development pressure that is presented here. Second – simultaneous
consideration and approval of these four applications is contrary to the law and City of
Phoenix policy. Furthermore, public notice has been deficient.
General Plan Amendment (GPA-DSTV-1-18-2); Zoning Amendments (Z-75-18-2 and Z-75-5-
18); and Planned Unit Development (Z-62-18-2).
See Notice of Results, North Gateway Village Planning Committee Meeting (March 10, 2022).
See Notice of Public Meeting, Desert View Village Planning Committee (April 5, 2022).
See Letter re Z-75-18-2 Zoning Map Amendment (December 17, 2021), p.2
Page 447
On behalf of PMPC, I ask that these applications not be approved as written but
that the Desert Maintenance Overlay District remain wholly intact, ensuring that
protections to washes, sensitive species and their habitats, and the delicate desert
ecosystem remain as intended.
About PMPC
The Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, Inc. is an organization founded in
1970 by Arizona visionaries dedicated to the protection of Phoenix’s Mountain Preserve
system. For the last 50 years, PMPC and its members have worked tirelessly to preserve,
protect, and advocate for the precious Mountain Preserve system, and to monitor and
address the rapid growth and development surrounding these important public resources.
For much of Phoenix’s modern history, our PMPC membership has worked hard
alongside hundreds of concerned Phoenix citizens and City staff to ensure that the
Sonoran Desert Preserves are protected and maintained as a valuable resource for all
citizens of Phoenix.
I. The Desert Maintenance Overlay District Must Not Be Altered
For many decades, protecting and preserving the unique desert features of the
Phoenix Sonoran Preserve and the surrounding area has been a priority for the City of
Phoenix. The PMPC and its members were involved in and supported the development
and adoption of the Desert Maintenance Overlay District (“DMOD” or “DMOD Overlay”)
at Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance in 2001, and the related working groups and
charettes involved with that process, as well as the formation and expansion of the
Phoenix Mountain Preserves. We support the critical protections carefully enacted by the
outlined in the DMOD Overlay, which must remain intact.
The true history of how the DMOD Overlay was developed is compelling. It is a
landmark instance of how land planning and landscape ecological principles can be
integrated as part of policy drafting processes. It should be a point of pride for the City of
Phoenix, and an asset worth protecting. Furthermore, the history shows that the DMOD
Overlay area and its boundaries were not simply dictated by road alignments (as the
developer incorrectly claims), but instead were carefully studied and thoughtfully drafted
in a manner integrating ecological considerations with planning structure, as part of one
of the most robust and widely supported Phoenix endeavors, to date. Finally, the owner(s)
of the “Verdin” property have owned this land for at least the last half-century, and have
had ample time and opportunities to challenge its classification over the last several
decades. The DMOD Overlay must not be altered.
Page 448
History of the Desert Maintenance Overlay District (DMOD)
On July 5, 2001, the approximately 6,724-acre DMOD was added to the Phoenix City
Zoning Ordinance at Section 653 (Sub-Districts A & B), shown on the following page. 5
It was carefully constructed by a large, interdisciplinary collaborative effort over
several years to study and understand the unique and sensitive characteristics of this
area, and protect those characteristics from the pressures of development. Historical city
documents and studies, reports, articles, and other research materials describe this
history, as summarized below.
1980s
On January 19, 1985, a large portion of northern Phoenix (including the current
DMOD Overlay area) was annexed into the city. 6 Tensions between increasing
development and impacts on sensitive desert areas were rising during this time. Spurred
in part by these tensions and concerns over the proposed development at Tatum Ranch, 7
the City Council developed a plan for this larger area, then called the peripheral Areas C
and D Areas, with “extensive” community assistance from a Council-appointed Citizen’s
See Zoning Ordinance Section 653 (Desert Character Overlay Districts).
See North Land Use Plan (May 1997), at 4; see also City of Phoenix Annexation Map.
See Quay, Ray. “Bridging the Gap Between Ecological Research and Land Use Policy: The
North Sonoran Collaborative” Urban Ecosystems, 7:283-294 (2004). Tatum Ranch was one of
the first developments to use groundwater and wastewater, opening the doors for more
development north of the CAP canal.
Page 449
Advisory Committee, as well as support from the State. 8 The Peripheral Areas C & D Plan
was adopted in 1987.
The Peripheral Areas C and D Plan was intended to direct the City of Phoenix on
future land use and development densities “to ensure that development in the area was
compatible with and complementary to the unique and environmentally sensitive
characteristics of the area.” 9 The Peripheral Areas C & D Plan describes this new
proactive approach: “Normally, the City is placed in a reactive role with respect to guiding
growth of a developing area. These northern areas; however, are largely undeveloped
and provide the City with a unique opportunity to anticipate growth and to establish an
overall framework to guide physical development.”10 Even at the time, the City recognized
that more work would be needed towards developing future protections, such as an
ordinance. 11
1990s
Development continued to increase in northern Phoenix during the early 1990s.
Subsequently, concerns about density and form of development within the ecologically
sensitive desert areas came to a critical point. A diverse group of public and private
planners, designers, environmental scientists, landscape architects, university
departments, as well as representatives from state agencies, private consultants, the City
of Phoenix, and State of Arizona began collaborating on a variety of studies, plans, and
charrettes for this area during this time. 12 This group (called the North Sonoran
Collaborative), formed and met regularly to address the gap between managing growth
and the ecological data needed to accomplish these goals. Their research was organized
into a multi-disciplinary GIS database, 13 one of the early instances of GIS usage by the
city and significant part of the group’s success.
The City of Phoenix began the process of revising the General Plan with detailed
objectives and design standards for this area during this time. The absence of ecological
See General Plan: Peripheral Areas C and D, City of Phoenix Planning Department, October
1987.
See City of Phoenix Planning Department Staff Report No. 58-01-02 (June 13, 2001),
recommending approval of the DMOD Overlay, at 2. Obtained via Public Records Request.
See FN 8 at 1.
See FN 9 at 2.
See FN 9 (p.2); see also FN 7; see also “ASU Program Stresses Ecological Approach to City
Planning”, University of Arizona Water Resources Research Center Newsletter, November-
December 1999, at 9.
See Ward, B., Burke, J., Ewan, J., Fish Ewan, R., Miller, W., Quay, R., Steiner, F. 1999. “A
Collaborative Approach to Planning.” ASU School of Planning & Landscape Architecture.
Page 450
information about the Northern Sonoran Desert was quickly recognized as a major
barrier, 14 so the City turned to the North Sonoran Collaborative and Arizona State
University (ASU) School of Planning and Landscape Architecture to conduct this much-
needed work. The city funded a detailed study of the Cave Creek Wash by ASU, the
success of which led to several additional studies of other nearby washes. 15 The Cave
Creek Study also helped build momentum for the acquisition of 15,000 acres of Preserve
lands including along the Cave Creek Wash corridor.
As a result of these extensive studies, a radical departure in methodology was
forming. “Basing preservation boundaries on ecosystems rather than topography or land
ownership is new to Phoenix. In the past, boundaries did not reflect the ecological
systems inherent in the landscape and so the impact of preserve size, shape, and
constitution on plant and wildlife habitats were not considered nor well understood.” 16
These and other processes led directly to the North Land Use Plan (adopted 1996)
and the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan (adopted 1998). Based in part on interviews with
neighbors in the area, the North Land Use Plan identified three Character Areas – the
Desert Preserve (today’s DMOD Overlay), the Rural Desert, and Suburban Desert – and
required that zoning overlay districts be created for each area “to provide clear
development standards which reflect community desires for each area.” 17
It is worth highlighting that the Desert Overlay development process was so unique
and ambitious that an entire session series of presentations were devoted to it at the 1999
American Planning Association’s National Conference held in Seattle, Washington. 18
Presenters included ASU professors, City of Phoenix Planning Deputy Director James
Burke, Assistant Director Ray Quay (all Collaborative members) who traveled from
Arizona to Washington to present their work to planners across the United States.
In a conference paper presented to planners nationwide, Terry Newton of the
Phoenix Planning Department noted that “the process for developing the three overlay
See FN 8.
This study was reportedly conducted by a team of ecologists and biologists from the ASU
Schools of Planning and Landscape Architecture and Life Sciences Department, Northern
Arizona University, the Desert Botanical Gardens, and the Arizona Game and Fish Department.
Their report on the biological values of Cave Creek Wash entitled “Cave Creek Wash:
Preservation Boundary Study” was published in 1996.
See Sonoran Preserve Master Plan (1998), at 16.
See North Land Use Plan (May 1997), at 19.
See 1999 APA National Planning Conference file (WorldCat record); see 1999 APA National
Planning Conference Table of Contents (see Session Series on The North Sonoran Collaborative,
five papers linked).
Page 451
ordinances is unlike any the city has undertaken in the past.” He continued, saying that
these guidelines could “set a new standard for the city’s approach to development in
natural desert areas for the city.” 19 He further described the specific acreage targeted for
protection:
“Much of the area identified by Subdistricts A and B is included in the
Arizona Preserve Initiative (API) application which is currently being
pursued by the city. Of the approximately 5,000 acres identified as
Subdistrict A, only 900 acres are outside of the API area. Subdistrict B
consists of approximately 1,700 acres with 1,500 acres falling outside of the
API area. Assuming the API area as currently identified successfully
becomes a preserve, approximately 2,400 acres in Subdistricts A and B
would remain for possible development. This is the area addressed by
this Overlay.” (Emphasis Added).
For reference, the current proposed rezoning applications submitted by developer
Taylor Morrison propose to remove approximately 218 acres of the 900 acres of
developable non-Preserve area from Subdistrict A, or about 24%. 20 While the number of
developable acreages may have shifted since this time, it is crucial to note that the
Overlay was developed to specifically target these developable acreages for protection
from intense development – including the intense residential development presented by
the “Verdin” project.
2000s
On June 13, 2001, the City Planning Commission met to consider and recommend
adoption of the DMOD Overlay to the City Council. On June 27, 2001, the City of Phoenix
granted the request as recommended, adopting the DMOD Overlay into the City Zoning
Ordinance. 21 Minutes from the June 13th Planning Commission hearing reveal the robust
community input and public involvement that supported writing the DMOD Overlay text. 22
Staff Report No. 58-01-2 23 recommending approval states:
See Newton, Terry, City of Phoenix Planning Department. Desert Character Overlay Zoning
District, Conference Paper presented to the American Planning Association, Seattle, WA. 1999.
See Staff Report – Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Z-TA-5-18-2 (March 9, 2022) at 12.
See FN 9. See also Application No. Z-TA-3-99-2 (to add the Desert Character Overlay District
at Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance); see Zoning Application No. Z-58-01-2 (establish the
Desert Maintenance Overlay District, one of three character districts authorized under Section
653); see Ordinance No. G-4380 and RCA35880 dated July 5, 2001 (adopting Ordinance).
See City of Phoenix Planning Commission Minutes (June 13, 2001) at 62; see also FN 9 at 2.
See FN 9.
Page 452
“The area has a high scenic value containing stands of dense native
vegetation, which support a delicate and fragile eco-system. Within the
proposed overlay is Cave Creek Wash, a unique wash system which is
designated for incorporation into the City of Phoenix Sonoran Preserve. The
Desert Maintenance District is intended to provide a buffer/transition
between this environmentally sensitive area and existing
development. This is an area with many washes of varying size which are
tributaries to Cave Creek Wash. It is an area of high habitat value that is
critical to the survival of numerous small mammals and a variety of
birds, as well as reptiles. Maintenance of the Sonoran Desert in this
area requires sensitive development strategies.”
2001), recommending approval of Z-58-01-2 and Z-TA-3-99-2. (Emphasis
added).
The DMOD Overlay was codified in the Zoning Ordinance at Section 653. Within
its very first paragraph: “The Desert Maintenance, Rural Desert and Suburban Desert
Overlay Districts are designed in response to existing undisturbed conditions and
pressures placed on them by increased development.” 24
The DMOD Overlay is split into Subdistricts A and B. Subdistrict A requires
minimum lot sizes of 35,000 square feet or greater, or 0-1.2 dwelling units per acre. 25
Subdistrict B requires minimum lot sizes of 18,000 square feet or greater, or 2-5 dwelling
units per acre. 26 Section 653(A) explains why development densities are more restrictive
in Subdistrict A (where a portion of the proposed “Verdin” project lies and which is the
subject of the rezoning applications) as follows:
“With the many washes to be maintained in an undisturbed condition
crossing this area, Subdistrict A is intended to provide a transition from the
preserve to areas with greater density. A very low density, scale and
intensity of residential development characterize this area. The
Desert Maintenance Overlay Subdistrict A is the least intensive with
regards to density allowed and the most restrictive in order to maintain the
fragile undisturbed areas and the wildlife corridor along the Cave Creek
Wash. Subdistrict B is characterized by low density development which may
be sited in clusters along with provision for an area to allow access to the
Cave Buttes Recreational Area. Through clustering of development in this
See FN 5 at Section (A).
See FN 5 at Section 653(B)(5); see also FN 9 at 3.
See FN 5 at Section 653(B)(6); see also FN 9 at 3.
Page 453
area the ability to maintain large connected undisturbed areas and washes
becomes possible.”
The DMOD Overlay is the only one of these three overlays completed to date. For
reasons not stated, the remaining two Desert Character Overlay Districts (Rural Desert
Overlay, Sec. 653(C) and the Suburban Desert Overlay, Sec. 653(D)) were never added
to the Desert Character Overlay District (Sec. 653), but have remained “Reserved” for the
past two decades. 27
While development has continued throughout the city, the thoughtfully formulated
Overlay at Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance has stood the test of time. Since adoption
in 2001, it has never been amended. However, granting the rezoning proposed by the
Taylor Morrison “Verdin” development to lift the DMOD Overlay will set a disastrous
precedent, allowing a developer to carve themselves out of the protective, robust Overlay
to facilitate their more dense (and thus more profitable) development plans. Removal of
these protections sets a chilling precedent for the survival of Sonoran Preserve and the
remaining acres of sensitive desert habitat and wash systems. The “Verdin” project
should not be exempted from the protective DMOD Overlay.
The “Technical Clean-Up” Road Alignment Argument Is Wrong
In a transparent effort to side step the powerful history and compelling reasoning
behind the Overlay, the developer claims that the requested rezonings (Z-75-18-2 and Z-
TA-5-18-2) to remove the DMOD Overlay from their property are just a “technical clean
ups” 28 to change the Overlay boundaries to align with Sonoran Desert Drive instead with
the Northeast Outer Loop alignment contemplated in the Peripheral Areas C & D Plan.
This is not true. The DMOD Overlay was never intended to move with any changes to the
proposed roadway.
The Sonoran Preserve Parkway route alignment involved a complex process that
included area residents, PMPC, the State Land Department, and Preserve and Parks
Committee study partners studying multiple alternatives. 29 After extensive public review,
one alignment was selected out of five. During a presentation to the Parks & Recreation
Board meeting, it was discussed that the selected Parkway alignment was chosen to
maintain existing wildlife corridors in the area, among other things. At the meeting Board
Chairperson Jim Holway asked “if there was a reason why the alignment had not been
See Zoning Ordinance Section 653 (Desert Character Overlay Districts), Subsections C & D.
See Letter from Susan Demmitt to Desert View Village Planner Julianna Pierre re Zoning Map
Amendment application Z-75-18-2 (December 17, 2021). Received via Public Records Request.
See Sonoran Desert Drive Alignment Study Fact Sheet.
Page 454
brought to the edge of the preserve.” Staff and Parks & Preserve Administrator Sarah Hall
explained that this was due to “major wash crossings” in the area, among other things. 30
A City Council Report recommending approval of the final Sonoran Parkway
alignment similarly states: “Special care was taken to maintain views of the surrounding
terrain, minimize scarring, preserve existing vegetation, and provide for wildlife crossings.
Provisions for future trail crossings have been incorporated and structure designs include
aesthetic treatment with native colors and textures to blend into the adjacent desert
landscape. Segments of the alignment will abut future Mountain Preserve and serve as a
buffer between the Mountain Preserve and adjacent development.”31
Never, in any part of the extensive Sonoran Parkway alignment review process,
was there ever a mention that the new alignment was intended to redraw the boundary
of the recently-adopted DMOD Overlay. Rather, the Sonoran Parkway alignment was not
intended to redraw the DMOD Overlay, it was intended to traverse it. The alignment was
specifically chosen to be harmonious with sensitive ecological features, not to pull back
protections for these features as the developer seems to suggest now.
Even the City of Phoenix 32 appears to reject the developer’s “technical clean-up”
roadway claim. Below (left) is the applicant’s proposed rezoning, reducing the DMOD
Overlay over a large swath. Below (right) is the City’s proposed modification, which
exempts just the “Verdin” property from the DMOD Overlay. Plainly, from these maps, the
“technical clean-up” roadway claim does not stand.
See Phoenix Parks & Recreation Board Meeting Minutes (June 26, 2003) at 9-10.
See City Council Report, Transportation, Parks & Seniors Subcommittee (June 8, 2006).
See Staff Report Z-62-18-2 – Verdin PUD dated March 9, 2022.
Page 455
The proposed “Verdin” project lie underneath Mesquite Wash, an important habitat
for many desert species, which runs through the heart of the property. Removal of the
DMOD Overlay would entirely remove the protections to Mesquite Wash. The “Verdin”
project would also intrude on Cave Creek Wash to the east, an important wildlife corridor
between the existing Preserve lands located to the north and south. A development more
dense than currently allowed would threaten the integrity and cut off connectivity of these
wildlife corridors. Indeed, one of the smallest birds native to the Sonoran Desert known
as the “Verdin” makes its home in wildlife corridors and washes including those that
would be threatened by the proposed “Verdin” development.
A blatant carve-out of the “Verdin” property from the DMOD Overlay to enable
more dense development is inappropriate. This flies in the face of so many years of hard
work, thoughtful community input and public review, careful research, and proactive good
planning. It is directly contrary to the intent of the DMOD Overlay, which exists to
proactively protect the sensitive desert ecosystem from developmental pressures, not
react to their desires. It also sets an awful precedent, opening the doors for future
developers to make similar requests, rendering the DMOD Overlay effectively
meaningless.
II. ISSUES REGARDING PROCESS
Simultaneous Consideration of All Cases Is Not Permitted
These four applications were simultaneously presented on, discussed, and
approved for recommendation through a vote by the North Gateway Village Planning
Committee on March 10, 2022. 33 The Desert View Village Planning Committee is
scheduled to meet and take action on these “companion cases” on April 5, 2022. 34 This
is not permitted under City of Phoenix processes and the law.
The City of Phoenix’s General Plan Amendment Planning Process Guide 35 notes
that simultaneous review of rezoning applications and requests to amend the General
Plan is prohibited. It specifically states:
May my rezoning application be reviewed simultaneously with my
application to amend the GENERAL PLAN?
No. Current City policy requires that action on a rezoning application is
separate from the procedure to amend the General Plan as State law
requires that all rezoning be consistent with and conform to the adopted
See FN 2.
See FN 3.
See City of Phoenix General Plan Amendment Planning Process Guide (rev. 08/12/2021)
Page 456
General Plan. A hearing on the rezoning application is to occur subsequent
to a determination on the change to the General Plan. However, you may
file your rezoning application and be scheduled for a hearing agenda
following action on the General Plan amendment. Note: This requirement
can be waived by the Planning and Development Director upon written
request for special circumstances.
General Plan Amendment Planning Process Guide, at p.2
A.R.S. § 9-462.01(F) states in relevant part that “[a]ll zoning and rezoning
ordinances adopted under this article shall be consistent with and conform to the adopted
general plan of the municipality”. It is the intent of the Legislature that revisions to the
General Plan must occur prior to, not simultaneous with, zoning and rezonings. This is an
important process as it protects the integrity of the General Plan and the processes
involved in its revision, including (but not at all limited to), ongoing public notice and
participation.
Exceptions to this requirement have not occurred and do not apply here.
Scheduling of a hearing agenda following action on the General Plan is not occurring
here, as the Verdin Minor General Plan Amendment Submittal (Case No. GPA-DSTV-1-
18-2) admits that “[t]his Amendment is being processed concurrently with applications to
change the zoning on the Property…” 36 Finally, there has been no indication that
developer Taylor Morrison has ever requested a written waiver of this explicit
requirement.
In addition, the General Plan Amendment Planning Process makes clear that the
contents of a General Plan Amendment hearing and a Rezoning hearing are quite
different. 37 For instance, certain zoning issues are “not appropriate for discussion” at a
General Plan Amendment hearing, including setbacks, elevation, open space, amenities,
and other topics. Simultaneous consideration of all of these applications, and
consideration of all of these topics at one single hearing, is inappropriate and contrary to
Phoenix City policies and Arizona laws governing municipal planning.
All Procedures for the Cases Must Be Complied With
On December 7, 2021 and December 9, 2021, the four applications were
presented and discussed at the Desert View Village Planning Committee and the North
Gateway Village Planning Committee regular monthly meetings, respectively. 38 On
See Verdin Major General Plan Amendment Submittal (December 17, 2021), p.5 (obtained via
public records request).
See FN 34 at 2-3.
See Desert View Village Planning Committee – Notice of Results (December 7, 2021); see
North Gateway Village Planning Committee – Notice of Results (December 9, 2021).
Page 457
December 17, 2021 and after these informational meetings, the General Plan
Amendment Application was resubmitted to the Planning & Development Department (the
first submittal having occurred over three years prior). 39 However, no further presentation
and discussion of this resubmittal occurred prior to voting meetings.
Neighborhood notification and meetings are also a requirement of the General
Plan Amendment process. Specifically, applicants are required to meet with property
owners within 600 feet of the subject site to present the proposal, and attempt to address
resident concerns. Furthermore, the General Plan Amendment Process Guide 40 requires:
“The results of that meeting shall be summarized and forwarded to the
village planner in whose village the case is located. No hearings shall be
scheduled without submittal of the following information:
• Date, time, and location of the meeting
• Number of participants
• Issues that arose during the meeting
• Plan to resolve the issues, if possible”
It is unclear whether this requirement has been met. Furthermore, if such a
meeting has occurred, it is important to determine whether the meeting occurred prior or
subsequent to the major resubmittal in December 2021. This is critical. Fundamental to
the planning process are ample, advance public notice allowing time for meaningful
review, engagement and participation.
For reasons stated above, the bundling of these four cases (rezoning applications,
request to amend the General Plan, and Planned Unit Development) is improper and
prohibited by the City of Phoenix’s own policy. Progression of these cases must stop on
this basis alone.
Public Review Opportunities Have Been Insufficient
The City of Phoenix Staff Report for Verdin PUD was not finalized until March 9,
2022, and was not posted on the Planned Unit Development Case List until just before
the North Gateway Village Planning Committee voting meeting on March 10, 2022. 41
Similarly, the City of Phoenix Staff Analysis for the General Plan Amendment was not
finalized until March 9, 2022. 42 Bafflingly, it is posted on the General Plan Amendment
See FN 35.
See FN 34.
See Staff Report Z-62-18-2 – Verdin PUD dated March 9, 2022.
See Staff Analysis GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 dated March 9, 2022.
Page 458
Case List under the year “2018” and not under “2022”, making it highly unlikely that an
interested citizen would easily be able to locate and review it (if they even knew it was
there). The City of Phoenix Staff Report for the Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment was
also not finalized until March 9, 2022. 43 Also bafflingly, it is posted on the Rezoning &
Text Amendment Case List under the year “2018” and not under “2022.” This stymies the
good-faith efforts of even the most persistent interested citizen, and certainly stifles public
participation.
Additionally, revisions to the Verdin PUD Narrative have repeatedly been
resubmitted by developer Taylor Morrison over the past three months. The most recent
resubmission was on March 3, 2022, a few short days before the North Gateway Village
Planning Committee voting meeting on March 10, 2022. 44 No notification of this updated
draft (or the specific changes it contains) was received in advance of the March 10th
meeting.
No notification or alert was ever received that these reports or updates were even
available, leaving no time for any meaningful public review (or even awareness of their
existence) prior to the first Village voting meeting. This is made more egregious by the
fact that there are significant public concerns with this development, which have been
repeatedly raised throughout the years. In fact, public concern about this project has been
expressed since the project was first proposed as “MacEwen 480” in 2018. 45 As the City
is likely aware, the organization known as Save Our Sonoran Preserve was formed by
residents in response to these very threats from this project and SOS has fiercely
advocated for protection of the Preserve and DMOD Overlay ever since.
Although the Public Meeting materials included allotted time for “Public
Comments”, this opportunity is not meaningful, when the public is not given sufficient time
to review the relevant documents in advance of key voting meetings. Proper time for
public participation and notice are required components of the public process for all of
these cases. As you know, A.R.S. § 9-461.06(C) directs municipalities to provide for
“effective, early and continuous public participation” with respect to General Plan
amendment processes.
See Staff Report – Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Z-TA-5-18-2 dated March 9, 2022.
See Verdin PUD Narrative.
See “1,420 homes may line 9,671 acres of preserved north Phoenix desert” (AZCentral,
January 12, 2022); see “Hikers upset home builder may redevelop part of North Phoenix desert”
(AZFamily, February 28, 2022); see “Preserve at odds with high density housing” (Sonoran News,
May 15, 2019); see “Outdoor enthusiasts blast plan for 1,400 homes near Phoenix Sonoran
Preserve” (AZCentral, May 14, 2019).
Page 459
Disclosing key materials on the same day as scheduled decision-making meetings
does not allow for meaningful public review and participation, and unfortunately, whether
or not intended, diminishes its importance. We sincerely hope that this will no longer be
the case moving forward.
III. CONCLUSION
The robust protections developed and codified in the Desert Maintenance Overlay
District have stood unaltered for the past 21 years. Erosion of these protections, if allowed
once, may not stop. Simply put, the Desert Maintenance Overlay District must be
preserved intact and not modified.
What we are asking for here is not radical. PMPC does not oppose a reasonable
development on the McEwen Ranch LLC property consistent with current development
standards and zoning requirements. Phoenix has already spoken with the approval of the
DMOD Overlay, which reflects the years of hard work put into development of the DMOD
Overlay by so many dedicated citizens and professionals.
Anything short of preserving the DMOD Overlay as-is will seriously degrade fragile
desert ecosystems in the area, sever connections between the Preserves, and set a
dangerous precedence where developers can easily bypass important protections for our
unique landscapes across Phoenix.
Yours Truly,
Patrick McMullen
Dr. Patrick McMullen, PhD, President
Phoenix Mountain Preservation Council, Inc.
Email: pmpcaz@gmail.com
CC: Director, Phoenix City Planning & Development
Phoenix City Planning & Development Department (zoning@phoenix.gov)
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Executive Board, Phoenix Mountain Preservation Council, Inc.
Page 460
REFERENCE: Z-62-18-2 Verdin PUD
TO: Phoenix Planning and Zoning Commission
I am a 30+ year resident of Phoenix and actively involved in the preservation and wise management
of our Mountain Preserves. I wish to compliment the work of the Planning and Zoning Department
staff in facilitating a robust public process that spanned the years of Covid-19 restrictions.
I want to publically acknowledge and thank the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council and the
Save Our Sonoran Desert coalition for their steadfast attention to this zoning case. Particularly the
purpose of the Desert Character Overlay Zone in protecting the Cave Creek Wash, an important
native desert asset for wildlife and Sonoran desert plants. Without their persistent voices the
opportunity to meet with the developers and have a productive conversation may never have
happened.
I submitted earlier comments prior to the Village Planning Committee meetings as follows:
STIP #1: Public trail access easements, as approved by the City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation
Department, shall be provided for the Mesquite Wash Corridor Trail, and the Community Paseo
Paths that provide a connection to future trail connections to the Sonoran Preserve as identified on
the Verdin Pedestrian Circulation plan dated June 3, 2019 included within the Verdin PUD, to ensure
permanent public access through the Verdin community to the Sonoran Preserve. The public access
shall be designed in a way to restrict unauthorized motor vehicle access, as approved by Parks. The
specific location, design and timing of construction of the public trail connections shall be
coordinated with and approved by the Parks and Recreation Department.
STIP #2: A minimum 25 foot open space tract shall be provided along the eastern boundary of the
Verdin property to provide a transition to the Cave Creek Wash corridor. The open space tract shall
be considered a Certified Area Type “B” – Natural Revegetated Area with plant material from the
Approved Plant List: Green List.
I am pleased to see these recommendations added to the stipulations of this PUD. I do want to
stress the importance of making sure public access designations are part of zoning approvals. Verbal
commitments are often lost over time as land ownership and management changes through the
decades. I also hope that Phoenix Planning and Zoning will view this PUD as the example for the
inevitable development of surrounding State Trust Lands that are not included in the Desert
Character Overlay and have adjacency to the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve and Cave Buttes Recreation
Area.
Yours in Conservation,
Vashti “Tice” Supplee
918 W. Roosevelt Street
Phoenix, AZ 85007
Vsupplee25@gmail.com
602-380-3722
Page 461
Racelle Escolar
From: Eric Idalski
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 2:15 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com
Subject: Sonoran Preserve concerns
Mr. Nico Howard,
I am writing to advise of my concern related to the proposed changes that would affect the Sonoran Preserve and surrounding
communities.
I am an avid user of the Sonoran Preserve as well as a volunteer park steward. I feel that the increased traffic volume that
would come on Sonoran Desert Drive is dangerous. Today I nearly witnessed a horrible accident as a young family was
crossing the road and vehicle traveling at a high rate of speed nearly hit them. I cant imagine double or triple the traffic as this
area already carries more traffic than is compatible with safe, enjoyable cycling and hiking. I also live just south of the road
and the additional road noise that will come with this is disturbing for current residents such as myself as well as the impact of
the noise in the preserve.
In addition, I am concerned with the overall impact on wildlife. We have already seen a loss of habitat for wildlife such as
owls and dessert tortoise that I see on occasion in between the north and south preserves. I will unfortunately be traveling for
business the week of the next hearing but hope that my concerns are heard.
Please help maintain the area and protect the preserve that so many have grown to love and enjoy and avoid detracting from
the tranquility treasured by trail users and visitors.
Kind Regards,
Eric Idalski
480-363-8735
Page1 462
Racelle Escolar
From: Joyce A Lefler
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 3:05 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com; Joyce A lefler
Subject: Save Our Sonoran Preserve
Please do NOT allow any more encroachment of houses or traffic or businesses in or near our Sonoran Preserve!
My husband and I are retired and years ago we sunk everything we have into our house near the preserve BECAUSE of the
quiet, peace, and hiking & biking trails of the preserve. This became our little piece of heaven while still being in the big city.
Please do not destroy this by allowing the preserve to be overbuilt. We enjoy the owls, bobcats, coyotes and javelinas who live
here. More traffic, more people and more houses will destroy their ability to live here, also.
Please do NOT allow our preserve to be slowly destroyed.
Joyce A Lefler
Joyce A Lefler, BSN, RTS, RNC‐OB (retired),
author of From Miracle to Murder: Justice for Adam
http://bit.ly/MiracletoMurder [bit.ly]
Page1 463
Racelle Escolar
From: Sue Pierce
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 1:58 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Sue Pierce
Subject: Verdun Development Along Sonoran Desert Drive
Dear Planning Commissioners,
Please accept my comments in opposition to the Verdun request to remove the Desert Character Overlay
along Sonoran Desert Drive.
I am a citizen of Phoenix, AZ and a resident who lives in a community along Dove Valley Road (Desert Enclave).
The rapid growth in the 85085‐zip code (and others in Phoenix) is a mixed blessing. We appreciate the job
growth, hundreds of new apartments and housing units, new retail stores, restaurants, commercial/industrial
development, and growth in tax revenues for the City and State. All important.
However, the growth comes with problems, too, that to date, no one has addressed adequately. Here are
concerns we have voiced for the last two years and that I want you to be aware of:
Roads not built to handle the increased traffic with no specific timeline for mitigation. The extra
turning lanes Verdun is proposing, and a possible traffic signal are simply Band‐Aids ‐ not solutions.
This creates serious safety issues for those living in the area and using the Preserve.
Desert Enclave residents not able to exit their development onto Dove Valley Road during morning and
afternoon rush hour. This will become worse with dense housing along Sonoran Desert Drive.
Biking lanes created along Sonoran Desert Drive no longer safe to use as trucks, trailers and cars travel
at 60 ‐ 80 miles/hour along the road.
Trash and debris are thrown along the roadway, including discarded metal, containers, etc. as traffic
increases. And yes, several of us walk the road to pick up what we can. However, there is just too much
for us to handle.
Increased traffic creates noise pollution that makes hiking trails at Apache Wash Trailhead less of a
respite from the busyness of the city. I hike with my noise cancelling headset on to block some of
it. Hiking the trails such as Ridgeback rarely am I able to get away from the site of houses or away from
the noise of the already overly busy road.
There are so many more concerns: water access(our HOA was told to reduce water use by 20%),
wildlife refuge issues, flooding along the washes and the fact that the City of Phoenix invested millions
into the creation of a beautiful preserve and roadway with paved trails and beautiful bridges. And now
what will come of that investment.
Please keep the Desert Character Overlay in place. Allow wise growth in the area near Apache Wash Trailhead.
Protect the Preserve as a wonderful urban haven for everyone to use as their escape from the city to the
desert.
Thank you,
Sue
Sue Pierce
Page1 464
Racelle Escolar
From: Sonoran Preserve
Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 11:58 AM
To: Racelle Escolar; PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Save Our Sonoran Preserve Official Statement on Verdin Rezone
Attachments: Planning Commission Comments Attachment.pdf
Dear Chair Howard & Members of the Phoenix City Planning Commission,
The following comments are submitted on behalf of Save Our Sonoran Preserve [supportpubliclands.com] and the nearly
1,000 nearby residents who have signed our petition at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/sonorapreserve
[surveymonkey.com]. These comments pertain to Items #5 to #8, on the May 5th Planning Commission agenda:
https://www.phoenix.gov/cityclerksite/PublicMeetings/220505008.pdf.
If Agenda Items #5‐#8 are approved, then the intensity of development on 155 acres of the Desert Character Overly
District could be doubled or tripled.
The site adjoins Sonoran Desert Drive. Attached to this message are:
An aerial showing the location of the nearly 1,000 area residents who have signed our petition thus far,
A copy of the petition, and
The reasons provided for 95% of petition signers for why they are deeply troubled by the applicant’s request to
deviate from the requirements of the Desert Character Overly District.
As you will see from the reasons provided by our petition signers, (*which is included in 47 of the 49 pages of the
attachment to this message) those who bike, run or walk along Sonoran Desert Drive feel that the volume of high‐speed
traffic already makes the two roadside bike lanes uncomfortable and in some respects unsafe. Indeed, the bike lane
design guidance documents published by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the National Association of City
Transportation Officials (NACTO), and others indicate that the current Sonoran Desert Drive bike lanes, which are
separated from travel lanes by a painted line, is insufficient when traffic volume exceeds 7,000 – 10,000 vehicles/day
and at speeds in excess of 35 mph.
According to the applicant’s (MacEwen 480) traffic study [app.box.com], Sonoran Desert Drive was carrying 8,300
vehicles/day as of 2019. The MacEwen 480 report indicated the project would add another 13,000 vehicles per day to
Sonoran Desert Drive. In other words, this one project would increase Sonoran Desert Drive traffic volume to more than
21,000 vehicles/day, which is far in excess of the upper limit for a bike lane separated from traffic by just a painted line.
Page1 465
The 45 mph speed limit along Sonoran Desert Drive makes the adjoining bike lanes far more dangerous than a more
appropriate facility. Most bike facility guidance documents call for bike lanes physically separated from travel lanes
when speeds exceed 35 mph. And the 85th percentile speed on Sonoran Desert Drive is likely 55 mph.
Of equal concern is the impact of increased Sonoran Desert Drive traffic noise on the Sonoran Desert Preserve sound
scape. While traffic noise can presently be heard along many of the trails ramifying the Preserve, the increased traffic
volume on Sonoran Desert Drive will increase the level of noise and the distance it intrudes into the Preserve. Acoustic
models indicate that each doubling of traffic volume also doubles traffic noise. By causing traffic volume to go from the
current 8,300 vehicles/day to more than 20,000 vehicles per day, the changes embodied in Agenda Items #5 ‐ #8, will
more than double the impact of traffic noise on the tranquility of Preserve trails.
It is for these reasons that we ask the Planning Commission to keep the Desert Character Overlay District as is and
recommend denial for Agenda Items #5 ‐ #8.
Following is a sampling of the reasons provided by those who signed the Save Our Sonoran Preserve petition:
I use the Sonoran preserve almost daily to get a brief reprieve from the overcrowding of Phoenix. The ability
to briefly enjoy the desert views without seeing endless developments and choking smog of cars is why we
decided to live in this area.
Currently traffic on Dove Valley / Sonoran Desert Drive is heavy during busy hours. With the addition of
Verdin adding 1200 homes could increase traffic by 3 times and with 2 new housing developments currently
being built west of us and the new semiconductor plant being built could increase traffic by 6 times as
where it is today. Plus taking over more of the desert landscape that was originally approved is just being
greedy. I am all for progress and increasing tax base but there must be limits to preserve the beauty of our
area.
The beauty of the desert is disappearing fast! We drive Sonoran desert drive 2‐3 times a week west bound
around sunset. So many people simply stop to take pictures because of the beauty. There is a brief
opportunity to do this because soon houses come into view and obstruct the natural vistas. Homes being
built today are huge two story monstrosities, cramming these large homes together will destroy this
beautiful landscape.
As a native Arizonan I am saddened to see so much of the natural beauty of our desert being scourged.
Driving anywhere in the valley and nearby areas you are assaulted by the lack of natural beauty. We need
to halt urban scrawl and save the desert for our grandchildren.
The Phoenix Sonoran Preserve is one of the finest uses of tax payer dollars. The ability to hike and mountain
bike on miles and miles of trails is one of my favorite parts of living in North Phoenix. We are already
inundated with apartment complexes and home developments with plenty of inventory. Plus, there is
plenty of land available for developers to build on that won’t wreck one of the best things that the City of
Phoenix has done in the past couple decades.
Page2 466
The Sonoran Preserve and the Sonoran Desert Drive represent the last of pristine desert in the City of
Phoenix. Anyone who has visited the Preserve and the Drive will see beautiful views, wildlife, and people
using the bike lanes and hiking trails. To allow a massive development to destroy the character overlay will
ruin the peaceful drive and endanger the ecosystem. I also fear that the additional traffic will no doubt
create dangerous conditions for cyclists that regularly train on Sonoran Desert Drive. We live here to
appreciate the desert. But the desert is disappearing in Phoenix. The Sonoran Preserve is a wonderful area
of Phoenix and a great place to escape to from the hustle and bustle of other areas. To grant the rezoning
request of a home builder will send the message that the City of Phoenix cares more about development
and not about the constituents who appreciate the desert and all that it offers.
Adding additional homes when there is no road infrastructure will add so much traffic. I drive SDD and
there are times when there are more than 25 cars backed up at the intersection of Cave Creek Rd. Also I am
concerned about closing up the wash between SDD because animals need to be able to traverse the entire
wash. I am not against the original number of homes but to increase it to what TM is asking is a lot more
homes. The Sonoran Preserve is very beautiful and I enjoy biking there but it is hard to cross the street with
the current amount of traffic on Dove Valley Rd and the Verdin Project will triple the amount of traffic.
I walk and bike at the preserve at least a couple of times a week. It’s beautiful, and quiet. Driving through to
Cave Creek Road is actually relaxing, I drive that way when I want to stay away from the crowds on the
freeways (17 & 101). It’s a beautiful drive, it’s what living in Az is about, wide open and beautiful to look at.
Don’t ruin it with more houses and traffic congestion.
We need to do everything we can to protect the Sonoran Desert Preserve. There shouldn’t be lots of homes
there. We’ve already taken so much of the natural habitat and developed it. We need to leave large chunks
alone so that those animals that live in the desert have a place. I love having the wilderness nearby and
untouched. Increasing the number of homes near the preserve is asking for trouble and displacing so many
of the desert animals. I bought out here to be close to nature not to bring the downtown traffic here.
Our schools are already over capacity and adding yet another high density housing development will
adversely impact the school infrastructure as well as the safety to bikers in Sonoran Boulevard/Dove
Valley. Allowing larger lots and this home sizes will attract more affluent residents and this increase the tax
revenues for this region.
I oppose the Verdin site changing the current Desert Character Overlay District plan. We are already seeing
traffic that is dangerous to our cyclists and pedestrians. Adding additional homes without concern for the
traffic it will bring will greatly make this road even more dangerous.
The Desert Character Overlay District was put in place to allow for growth but with measures and
safeguards needed. Ignoring and allowing growth beyond that allowed by the Desert Overlay District in the
Sonoran Preserve area is wrong and will lessen the uniqueness and beauty that we currently have, while
also adding traffic and reducing safety for those that currently enjoy cycling, walking, hiking, etc. along
Sonoran and the preserves. Please do not allow Verdin development to move forward with their plans to
exponentially grow this area and add more homes To the Sonoran Preserve. Thank you.
Lastly, maintaining the Desert Character Overlay does not halt this project, it will only allow for smart development
near one of Phoenix’s beloved Preserves (a sensitive site) as well as give a sense of resilience to our zoning laws that
our elected officials approved. If there is one zoning law to uphold and one location to protect, it’s definitely this
one.
Respectfully,
Page3 467
Gary Kirkilas, Chair
Save Our Sonoran Preserve
(708) 369‐4566
saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com
[google.com]
*See Attachment
Page4 468
Save Our Sonoran
Petition Signer
Locations
Page 469
➤
N
10 mi
Page 470
Reasons Provided By Phoenix Residents for Why They Signed
the Save Our Sonoran Preserve Petition at:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/sonorapreserve
I use the Sonoran preserve almost daily to get a brief reprieve from the overcrowding of Phoenix. The ability to
briefly enjoy the desert views without seeing endless developments and choking smog of cars is why we decided
to live in this area.
Currently traffic on Dove Valley / Sonoran Desert Drive is heavy during busy hours. With the addition of Verdin
adding 1200 homes could increase traffic by 3 times and with 2 new housing developments currently being built
west of us and the new semiconductor plant being built could increase traffic by 6 times as where it is today.
Plus taking over more of the desert landscape that was originally approved is just being greedy. I am all for
progress and increasing tax base but there must be limits to preserve the beauty of our area.
The beauty of the desert is disappearing fast! We drive Sonoran desert drive 2‐3 times a week west bound
around sunset. So many people simple stop to take pictures because of the beauty. There is a brief opportunity
to do this because soon houses come into view and obstruct the natural vistas. Home being built today are huge
two story monstrosities, craning this large home together will destroy this beautiful landscape.
As a native Arizonan I am saddened to see so much of the natural beauty of our desert being scourged. Driving
anywhere in the valley and nearby areas you are assaulted by the lack of natural beauty. We need to halt urban
scrawl and save the desert for our grandchildren.
The Phoenix Sonoran Preserve is one of the finest uses of tax payer dollars. The ability to hike and mountain
bike on miles and miles of trails is one of my favorite parts of living in North Phoenix. We are already inundated
with apartment complexes and home developments with plenty of inventory. Plus, there is plenty of land
available for developers to build on that won’t wreck one of the best things that the City of Phoenix has done in
the past couple decades.
The Sonoran Preserve and the Sonoran Desert Drive represent the last of pristine desert in the city of Phoenix.
Anyone who has visited the Preserve and the Drive will see beautiful views, wildlife, and people using the bike
lanes and hiking trails. To allow a massive development destroy the character overlay will ruin the peaceful
drive and endanger the ecosystem. I also fear that the additional traffic will no doubt create dangerous
conditions for cyclists that regularly train on Sonoran Desert Drive. We live here to appreciate the desert. But
the desert is disappearing in Phoenix. The Sonoran Preserve is a wonderful area of Phoenix and a great place to
escape to from the hustle and bustle of other areas. To grant the rezoning request of a home builder will send
the message that the City of Phoenix cares more about development and not about the constituents who
Adding additional homes when there is no road infrastructure will add so much traffic. I drive SDD and there are
times when there are more than 25 cars backed up at the intersection of Cave Creek Rd. Also I am concerned
about closing up the wash between SDD because animals need to be able to traverse the entire wash. I am not
against the original number of homes but to increase it to what TM is asking is a lot more homes. The Sonoran
Preserve is very beautiful and I enjoy biking there but it is hard to cross the street with the current amount of
traffic on Dove Valley Rd and the Verdin Project will triple the amount of traffic.
I walk and bike at the preserve at least a couple of times a week. It’s beautiful, and quiet. Driving through to
cave creek rd is actually relaxing, I drive that way when I want to stay away from the crowds on the freeways
(17 & 101). It’s a beautiful drive, it’s what living in Az is about, wide open and beautiful to look at. Don’t ruin it
with more houses and traffic congestion.
Page 471
We need to do everything we can to protect the Sonoran Desert Preserve. There shouldn’t be lots of homes
there. We’ve already taken so much of the natural habitat and developed it. We need to leave large chunks
alone so that those animals that live in the desert have a place. I love having the wilderness nearby and
untouched. Increasing the number of homes near the preserve is asking for trouble and displacing so many of
the desert animals. I bought out here to be close to nature not to bring the downtown traffic here.
Our schools are already over capacity and adding yet another high density housing development will adversely
impact the school infrastructure as well as the safety to bikers in Sonoran Boulevard/Dove Valley. Allowing
larger lots and this home sizes will attract more affluent residents and this increase the tax revenues for this
I oppose the Verdin site changing the current Desert Character Overlay District plan. We are already seeing
traffic that is dangerous to our cyclists and pedestrians. Adding additional homes without concern for the traffic
it will bring will greatly make this road even more dangerous.
The Desert Character Overlay District was put in place to allow for growth but with measures and safeguards
needed. Ignoring and allowing growth beyond that allowed by the Desert Overlay District in the Sonoran
Preserve area is wrong and will lesson the uniqueness and beauty that we currently have, while also adding
traffic and reducing safety for those that currently enjoy cycling, walking, hiking, etc. along Sonoran and the
preserves. Please do not allow Verdin development to move forward with their plans to exponentially grow this
area and add more homes To the Sonoran Preserve. Thank you.
The unique space is one of the main reasons we built our home in the Gateway region. It has only been open
for a few years and needs to remain a "Preserve" and not stress or encroach on the desert any more than
already has happened.
as a third generation native zoney, I have seen too much of our beautiful desert turned over to developers. We
must preserve the very asset that draws so many to move to our wonderful state‐ find a better balance
between growth and preservation. I recently moved to a home in Sonoran Foothills to enjoy this beautiful area.
Please do not allow the greed of developers overbuild our desert.
Too much traffic and too many users making heavy environmental impact. The preserve is there for a reason.
any change to Desert Character Overlay will open the door to the entire area being filled in with high density
housing. Forever destroying the natural landscape of the area. Please vote NO.
There is already so much danger to bicyclists. Also, just as important, keeping the desert beautiful and allowing
wildlife to thrive in the Sonoran Preserve.
I've hiked the Apache Trail and adjacent areas through the years while visiting my family in Phoenix. I recently
bought a house in the area and I'm saddened and alarmed that the Phoenix City Council would entertain the
doubling or tripling the number of housing units on the Verdin site. There is a reason why the Desert Character
Overlay District is in existence. I strongly urge the Council to reject the Verdin development company's proposal
to double or triple the number of housing units for the Verdin site.
With the amount of traffic on Sonoran/Dove Valley today, when we pull out of Sonoran Gate Community, it is
taking a chance on your life when needing to turn left. Why would anyone approve more home building to get
more traffic? Also cars ‐ and trucks ‐ are speeding between 55‐70 miles an hour on this stretch. You should
have traffic lights at all intersections for turning traffic. Also, Let's Save Our Desert Views ‐ that's why we built a
Traffic is already overloaded on dove valley road and commitments were made to develop the Sonoran desert
drive. Nothing has happen. Trying to exit my desert enclave neighbor is struggle now, adding more traffic is
negligent. I also moved to the area for the serenity of the preserves and natural habits, all developers in the
area must comply with the desert character overlay.
Page 472
My wife Barbara and I have lived in Sonoran Foothills for nearly nine years. The appeal of this location was and
still is the Sonoran Preserve, a true gift to the residents of Phoenix. Many years ago the overlay district
created a plan for growth balanced with the fragile ecosystem of the preserve. Neglecting this balance
jeopardizes the character which makes this place so special as well as places the preserve at risk. I respectfully
request the Phoenix City Council comply with the overlay and hold Verdin to the established guidelines. After all,
one of the reasons this area appeals to them is they recognize the beauty and appeal of this location to future
There’s very few places in Arizona where it’s not jam packed with houses and people. As an outdoorsman it’s a
very special place as every weekend I go there to ride a bike, hike, among other things. With the recent houses
built, it went from a Mecca for outdoor enthusiasts to just a nice place. I used to be able to ride and run without
seeing anyone for miles. Now Everytime I almost get hit by a car traveling to fast and then riding in the bike
lane. Phoenix in general is one of the worst cities for bike fatalities and this literally is the one spot that we can
count on for not getting hit. If this goes up than we really will have no place to call home. Please reconsider
This area is greatly used for hiking, biking, trail running, and outdoor recreational activities. We do not want
over development to ruin the natural aesthetics, significantly increase noise, or pollution that would degrade
the value of the true remaining wilderness in the Sonoran Desert Preserve. Please seek to enforce and uphold
the Desert Character Overlay District toward the Verdin project and other subsequent proposals.
Traffic is my main issue. As a Sonoran bike route it is becoming more and more dangerous for bikers. School
traffic on main roads and through neighborhoods also has become more dangerous. Wilderness can never be
recaptured once homes are built so we have a once in a lifetime duty to save land for conservation and wildlife.
Thanks for listening
We need to preserve the landscape before there is nothing left of the valley except city streets. The entire eco
system changes affecting animal habitats, raising temperatures, and Killing plant life. Phoenix is slowly killing
an entire section of it's appeal by building further north into natural landscape.
I hike thru the preserve almost everyday. It is a beautiful and peaceful area amid the city. Losing this area to
Korea housing would be awful. There is so much development everywhere so these special areas are becoming
all the more important to spare or not over develop. Once it is gone it can not be replaced. Please don't let this
wonderful area be ruined by more over development!
Maintain desert preserve, congestion, quality of life, safer place to enjoy desert with exercise.
Love the beauty that this area brings to all.
We need to start limiting the amount of residential builds in the Sonoran Preserve area before this majestic
natural place is no more. Preserve the habitat and recreational area this land offers local residents and tourists.
The area is already congested and poses safety concerns for bicyclists, hikers and drivers due to the increased
motor traffic activity. Adding more congestion would further escalate the risk and concern associated.
Additional development will ruin the Sonoran Reserve’s pristine nature. Please preserve this vital area for our
Desert’s wildlife for generations to come to enjoy .
The development that is already out there detracts from the natural environment immensely. Additional
development will only make this worse. Build elsewhere...just not here please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Sonoran Preserve was the deciding factor for my wife and I to move to this area. We had hoped that
Preserve would stay as it is a Natural desert landscape that was protected for all to enjoy. We enjoy the
numerous hiking trails, walking areas that are safe and the pavilions that we use to gather with friends . We
knew that there would be issues when we seen new developments popping up and took away the Natural
surroundings. This has to stop . Did I mention the wildlife that we all see and enjoy? These developments are all
about one thing ‐ greed. Please let this continue to be the Sonoran Preserve!
Page 473
I am a local resident that loves riding and hiking the Sonoran Preserve. We already have so much traffic in the
road ways around the preserve. I am tired of having to live in a beautiful desert that just keeps slowly
disappearing because of development. Animals are being pushed out and more traffic noise and people does
not help. The schools are already maxed out. How many more homes will come after this development is
approved? Please keep the desert the desert.
Wildlife protection and natural beauty
It’s our beautiful land! Save the land from unnecessary buildings.
Want to keep area lower traffic
Safeguarding the Sonoran Desert Preserve values we treasure
It is not needed for the tax base, it will overwhelm the infrastructure in place, it will eventually lead to the
destruction of the desert through the continued use of ATVs and other off road recreational vehicles as well as
lead to increased congestion and, yes, increased crime.
It’s vital to keep the preserve natural and untouched for the use of hiking and supporting outdoor activities.
Without the regulations in place there would be no preserve to use and admire. The animals in the preserve
would be greatly affected by a larger population crowding them.
It is important to preserve the natural desert landscape and prevent overbuild that will destroy habitats.
Ignoring the desert character overlay district would be a HUGE mistake. Overdevelopment will ruin the desert
and will change the habitat in and around that area and big developers don’t care about that so it’s our job to
care for them.
We need more open space and already have enough homes!
No more building and take away from our desert landscape. Stop already.
Concerned for the environment, the pollution in our area is to much. The desert is also disappearing because of
over population
Sonoran desert is such a beautiful drive. Everyone should be able to experience it. Sonoran desert drive is not
meant for a high volumes of traffic and our beautiful Sonoran desert would be ruined with the addition of
housing developments along Sonoran Desert Drive.
I’m concerned about all the animals in the area. As well as if you continue to build what about the schools and
the traffic. It no longer will be a peaceful environment. And the more expensive homes you build people really
can’t afford them but end up in bankruptcy and then they’ll be empty
We need open space for our and our children's mental health to provide a place of refuge and exercise areas
that remove us from the daily drone of cars, machines and our phones.
The volume of traffic is already out of control on Sonoran Desert Drive. Please keep the Sonoran Preserve as it
Protect wildlife that has already been driven out of surrounding areas. Keep the intention of a preserve.
As the builders destroy the land for more houses the animal life get pushed away and in to smaller areas of
open land. Or get caught in or on people's property. Unacceptable to just ignore the standards for there
That is a protected place that we need to take care as part of our lungs we need good air, we have so many
houses, why we need to destroy the habitat of a lot of animals.
Overdeveloping is irresponsible when there’s no plan for increased traffic and water supply!
Preserve recreation area that is part of and enjoyed by our community. Prevent gross over development which
will destroy the desert community which we call home
This land is important to keep more open than crowded!
Keep our desert traffic and congestion to a minimum; we still enjoy a lot of wildlife.
Keeping the beauty of the desert in tact, especially with the hiking/biking that is done there. Also very
concerned about traffic and congestion.
Taking away the sceneries wildlife and open park trails to enjoy. Once you start building gets crowded needing
more wider roads taking away from the above
Page 474
It is vitally important that the Sonoran desert preserve is kept safe from over population of the surrounding
areas! The overbuilding of the area will degrade the beautiful that we and future generations need in our lives
to create the balance of city living. It’s critical! Over building followed by extremely high traffic increases will
destroy the preservation of it’s natural beauty. I ask that the members of the Phoenix City Counsel hear our
concerns and uphold the Desert Character Overlay District as it was intended.
Destroying the desert, views and too much traffic on Dove Valley/Sonoran PkwyN which also funnels to Jomax
where many school‐aged child ride bikes and walk.
I have lived in this area for 11 years and have been walking those trails for just as long. It is an amazing preserve
that I treasure walking every single day. The scenery is beautiful and the wildlife thrives in the area. Losing any
portion of this place would be a disgrace to this gorgeous piece of land that should be protected for the people
of our area. Please reconsider this, i am beyond disappointed to hear that this is even a thought. Please save our
Beautiful desert scenery and nearby desert recreation like hiking and biking.
I am concerned because my backyard will face the six lane road. As it is the two lane road(dove valley and
Sonoran dessert drive) is driven like a freeway and most people do not go the speed limit. I could just imagine
what the six lane would be like behind us. When we purchased this home we were not made aware of the plans
the city had for this area. Very disappointed. Also Verdin having 1400 hundred homes would really make the
traffic crazier than it already is right now.. like I said very disappointing!!
Traffic will increase dramatically! Hiking and cycling will no longer be enjoyable and r safe.
The growth of the area needs to slow down. The area cannot handle the traffic nor can the police keep up with
enforcing traffic safety. There are too many irresponsible drivers who think Senora Desert Dr is a nascar
track. Adding more drivers will be an irresponsible choice of local government and making our roads less safe
for recreational use. A white line for a bike lane does nothing when cars/trucks are going 60 mph.
Way too much traffic
Desire to maintain the nature preserve and to limit traffic and related safety hazards.
The desert is being over built and animals have few places left to inhabit. The views of mountains and the
skyline are increasingly blocked by taller and taller buildings and dwellings
I moved to this area to enjoy the desert and the wildlife associated with the environment. Developers have one
objective ‐ money. We must preserve what is left of this beautiful landscape
Beautiful drive and prime hiking area
Northern Phoenix is already getting overrun by new developments. Would be nice to keep some lands in their
natural state so we can enjoy the beauty it brings
It’s a beautiful corridor and vital habitat for desert wildlife, along with a natural desert wash.
I live right next to it and want to see it preserved.
I love this natural area. It is very important that the building be kept down as we are losing our natural areas to
concrete and overdevelopment. AZ does not have enough water for all of these homes/buildings. Traffic is
horrendous already. Please don’t do this.
Original 2006 owner who has seen this area grow and change. I’m very concerned about the population over
expansion in this area. I live right off Dove Valley which has already become unsafe due to traffic volume and
lack of proper traffic signals (some of which are on the way). However, I don’t believe Dove Valley was ever
intended to hold the kind of volume it will experience if growth is not governed. I for one wholeheartedly
support the enforcement of the Desert Character Overlay District. Thank you
I grew up in cave creek which is right on the other side and I know the value to this desert landscape and the
peace it brings to others. It’s natures playground let it be
Preserving the natural beauty of the area is important to current residents. They use this area for healthy
recreation. It also should be saved fir environmental reasons. Don’t add to the sprawl that is already part of
may areas in Phoenix .
I live in the neighborhood and don’t want them to change our desert look it’s very important
Page 475
The Desert Character Overlay District should be adhered to.
My family and I enjoy biking and hiking in that area, which is part of the reason we live where we do. We believe
the City of Phoenix made a informed and important decision to maintain the wilderness, beauty and safety of
that area for a reason and would hate to see that decision overturned.
This is a beautiful scenic preserve that has already experienced housing growth, wild fires caused by humans,
and an increase in traffic. We have lived in this area for 15 years and specifically love that it used to be quiet and
just outside of the city. No thank you to further developments! Preserve the land, wildlife, and natural growth!
This is a great recreation area for biking and hiking and too high of density development will be detrimental to
these uses.
Our wildlife is being displaced and soon will not have a place to live. People want them killed as they are afraid
of them! We will live in a denser area and it will soon feel like NY City! We must find a balance for all.
The main reason we bought our home in this location was because of how beautiful the desert is and very
peaceful. Almost feels like we're out of town in our very own neighborhood. Also, there is already an
infrastructure challenge with the lack of grocery stores, restaurants, gas stations etc. Adding 1200 more homes
would have a major impact on everything around us and create serious traffic issues to go anywhere, even on
I and my family moved to this area to enjoy the preserve. While we understand there is growth in the area, it
was done under the rules and regulations set forth. I would ask that all builders comply.
Too many housing developments going up, water, waste and increased traffic issues.
Leaving the preserve alone will allow animals to preserve their homes. This drive is one of the most beautiful
drives in the valley and really displays all of what is natural Arizona. Also, traffic is bad enough as it is. Adding
thousands of houses would further crowd what is currently a quiet, serene pet of the valley. Let’s keep a small
piece of desert instead.
I have lived in the norterra area since 2006. I have seen the development boom since I arrived. This last little bit
of land seems to be the only thing left in the area. It's necessary to preserve for wildlife and for us. We are
nurtured by nature. The drive is beautiful and we utilize hiking and biking trails often.
I absolutely love the beauty of the desert and the opportunity we have to get out in the preserve to hike, run
and bike. I am an avid trail runner and hiker and would be devastated if we lose that ability just to make way for
more houses.
The speed at which the traffic flows is about 20 over the speed limit and it is a matter of time before a biker is
killed. This is happening currently and with more traffic /homes it will be worse. We don’t have the school
space to support more homes. We moved up north to get away from traffic and now the desert is at risk of
being destroyed by more builds.
After retirement, I moved here from the city specifically to enjoy the Sonora Preserve. To lose the beauty of
The Preserve would be nothing short Of a crime.
I love to hike, bike, and walk the foothills. Open space is why we bought up here.
I live off of Sonoran Desert Drive now. There is no infrastructure in place at this time to support additional
development. There has already been an influx of both commercial and residential in this area within the last
year. Until the city, county and state does much more work to improve our roads, water, and law enforcement
existing issues; there should be no further development at this time.
I am very concerned with the amount of traffic and safety in my community with the amount of people that
could potentially be here. We are a quiet and safe neighborhood and I'd like to keep it this way.
Traffic is already too heavy and congested. Our streets are becoming dangerous.
It is important that we preserve our land to make it available to enjoy the outside life without the traffic.
This area is beautiful and it would be a shame for it to be overdeveloped.
It’s a preserve for a reason. That’s why we chose to live here. Thank you.
The number of people hiking is increasing but even if is not, the streets are narrow and it is dangerous to drive.
Page 476
The Sonoran Preserve is a magnificent specimen of the desert. The desert plants and wildlife within this area are
a dream come true for hikers and bicyclists. With the increase of people moving into the area, traffic has grown
exponentially. If we build more homes in this area, we need to put measures in place to protect this valuable
asset to our state, as well as provide safety for the people who visit it throughout the year.
I'm mountain bike in the Sonoran preserve 3 to 4 times per week and feel it is vitally important to keep some
space set aside with minimal traffic and housing.
I have many reasons for you to consider preserving the Sonoran Preserve and Sonora Desert Drive. Homes and
traffic directly impact the fragile desert. Urban heat, pollution, and human destruction directly destroy the
desert plants. The Sonoran Preserve was set aside for the specific reason of preserving an area for people to
enjoy the beauty of the desert. Adding homes along the Sonoran Preserve and Sonoran Desert Drive will
increase traffic. Solutions to traffic congestion is to add and or expand lanes which will take up desert land.
Lastly and more importantly, Arizona is in a major drought. More homes means less water. There are plenty of
homes and apartments being built in Phoenix without taking from the Sonoran Preserve and Sonora Desert
The preserve is a sanctuary and feel that this increased volume of homes would create a dangerous high traffic
in an area that is a recreational haven for cyclist, hikers and runners. The impact of these homes will also have a
negative affect on the the wildlife and natural dessert of the area.
We chose to move to Sonoran Foothills to be close to the desert landscape and away from the dense population
of the city. We understood that the city had protected the areas surrounding the preserve by requiring certain
standards and limiting the number of homes that can be built. The requirements that were in place while the
Sonoran foothills community was being built, maintain the overall integrity of the surrounding desert. There is a
mix of apartment homes, patio homes and homes with lots. All were required to follow strict landscaping
guidelines to match the desert. Why aren’t these standards being upheld for any future development? It is
evident that greed is now winning. The home builders goal is to build as many houses as will be allowed as this is
most profitable for them. They are NOT concerned with the impact this will have on traffic, current residents or
the desert. Also, it appears the city is trying to solve the housing shortage by putting in a disproportionate
number of high density dwellings from I‐17 to Cave Creek.
Me and my family and friends are all avid trail runners with great respect for our wildlife and natural
ecosystems. I don’t dispute the need for housing but the Desert Character Overlay District put the standards in
place for exactly this reason ‐ to prevent developers from overdevelopment that would ruin the NATURAL
ecosystem. I applaud them for some of the measures they propose in planning but that will never make up for
any zoning change and quite frankly is hypocritical. Please make sure Verdin complies with the current standard
I frequent the Sonoran Preserve 2‐3 times a week and my husband road bikes 4‐5 times a week in the bike
lanes. We enjoy being able to go enjoy the desert without having to see home after home. We are also in a
drought and putting more homes up does not help address the issue. Please think about keeping more open
spaces for everyone to enjoy who already lives here it is getting crowded enough.
My family and I are avid cyclists, and for the past five years we have seen an increase of cars and speed. I myself
had a couple of car and motorcycle incidents due to the amount of traffic and their speed. I’m worried that with
the increase of housing it’s only going to make our rides more dangerous, as drivers don’t respect speed limits.
Please keep the overlay as it was intended. Don’t put money over our safety. Thank you
There has been way to much building in the Sonoran Preserve area! This is destroying the beauty of the desert. I
have lived in Phoenix area for 49 years and this once beautiful desert is being destroyed by over developing.
Some of the most recent developments off the I‐17 and Dexalita destroy some of the mountain to put more
homes in the area. When this happens we are not being good stuarts of the land. We need to find away to live
Page 477
I have lived at this address for 20 years and have watched the area grow. My wife and I have hiked and biked in
the Sonoran Preserve area hundreds of times, and now we have introduced our children to a love of nature
through seeing Olive the owl on Hawk's Nest Trail and wildflower blooms biking along the Apache Wash trail. In
the middle of a growing city, this Preserve is an oasis that allows residents from near and far to relax and escape
the pace of city life. It magically transports visitors to a place that feels quiet and free. Please help us preserve
this for us and future visitors!
Phoenix is growing at a very rapid rate. If something is not done now to save lands, there will be no desert areas
left and all wildlife here will perish. We must preserve this unique Sonoran Preserve.
I've lived in this area for the last 3+ years and a major reason we moved here is because of the desert setting
and because it didn't feel as crowded as other parts of the Valley. Sad to see our beautiful preserve turned into
crappy track homes.
I'm mainly just concerned with the increased amount of traffic new housing developments will create.
I hike from Apache Wash frequently as well as the trails in Sonoran Preserve South and don’t want to see the
desert character of these areas impacted. Please hold Taylor Morrison to these rules. They were put in place for
a reason. Don’t allow them to disregard them.
The amount of traffic we already have on dove valley is excessive. We do not need to add more.
I am signing this petition as I care deeply about keeping the Sonoran preserve sacred. It is important to preserve
the existing ecosystems. Additionally, This area is already dangerous with increasing traffic.
I love cycling here and I don't want that to change.
It is nature at its finest. The desert is dwindling especially in this area with all of the commercial building and
housing going up. The hot air balloons are even running out of space to take off from and land on. Dove Valley
Road / Sonoran Desert Drive has become a speedway and dumping ground. It is a shame that people have such
disregard for such a beautiful area and putting up more housing will only make it worse. Years ago we were told
that no homes would be built off of that road. I know because I used to live in Carefree Crossings and attended
many meetings about it. Listen to the people for a change and leave this area alone. It was built for people to
enjoy it, not destroy it.
I want to preserve the desert. We have a water shortage not enough water now for the people that live here.
Not enough schools why aren’t the building responsible for building schools for the children?
We do not want this new development because we love the natural desert we chose to live near. In addition,
we do need the excessive amount of traffic that such a development would cause.
The original proposal to conserve the ecosystem while allowing for reasonable growth is threatened. The
proposed increase will increase vehicle traffic, noise, pollution, and make biking along this area unsafe.
The beauty and tranquility of the Sonoran Preserve is vital to the character of this community’s identity.
With so much growth in Arizona & Phoenix in particular, it is vital to retain the open spaces for all residents to
use and enjoy ‐ there was great foresight when determining preserves and buffered lands around them. The
roads ‐ current and even proposed new ones ‐ won’t be able to safely support the sudden surge of vehicles and
will most definitely increase the traffic volume and many drivers, bikers and pedestrians will experience a
greater risk of accidents. Please listen to the residents in the area that will be most impacted. Thank you.
We don't have the infrastructure to support any additional growth. I wish we could halt the issuance of any
further building permits in the state until we can guarantee the people of AZ that we will have adequate water
and energy resources to match projected growth rates. We can NOT have growth outpace supply.
Our house backs up to the desert. We bought that house because it backs up to the desert, I want to to keep
our view and our slower simple lifestyle there and not turn its into a big city feel.
I don’t want to see traffic increase. I would like to see the desert stay peaceful and empty.
Want beauty while biking
Page 478
I have cycled on this road for close to a decade. It’s been one of the only “safe” roads. In addition, the preserve
is quiet and beautiful and has remained a short distance from home. As traffic gets worse we are losing that
quiet, beautiful Arizona gem.
We specifically moved to this area b/c of the preserve and the peacefulness that it brings to our lives and
neighborhood. District guidelines are in place for a reason and should not be adjusted for a greedy developer.
I enjoy cycling on the road. It is a safe, fast, and serene place to ride my bike. The crisp early morning air,
sunrise, and hot air balloons, are a real treat.
Keep the beauty of the desert and keep traffic minimal on Sonoran Desert Drive as there are no crossroads to
take as an alternate route if traffic is heavy on Sonoran Desert Drive.
This area is vital for wildlife and preserving the bike trails be able to trail ride in the unspoiled desert we don’t
need anymore traffic thru here it would completely ruin the whole area
My household enjoys both biking and hiking along the Sonoran Desert Drive several times a week. One of the
main reasons I moved out of the Kierland area was to escape the traffic/congestion. Please don't turn my
beautiful Sonoran Preserve into a traffic nightmare. Uphold the safeguards that make this preserve a treasure.
Thank you, Councilman Waring.
We back up to Dove Valley.....the traffic has already increased exponentially over the past few years and people
use this road as a freeway....safety for our kids and everyone in our community is a huge concern.
My family and I use these trials for recreation purposes. We are also concerned as a community for the traffic as
well as how it will effect the wildlife.
Please do not overcrowd our area and stress our resources. Sonoran Desert Drive is beautiful and offers
wonderful opportunity to be outside and healthy. Please preserve this area.
We moved here for the natural beauty of this area and the outdoor freedom to run, bike and hike. In addition
we wanted to get away from all the congestion and crazy traffic. I am concerned for pedestrian safety and not
being able to enjoy the wilderness in peace. Not to mention all the traffic added to Sonoran Desert Drive which
is no longer relaxing and becomes stressful on a daily basis.
Congestion. Rezoning opens doors to more rezoning. Will cost the county money to widen roads. And I like less
people around.
We need less development and more room to safely enjoy nature with trails and outdoor activities. Dove Valley
Rd is already a speed zone and super trafficked, more development is a detriment to our beautiful Sonoran
Preserve. Please reject this proposal.
This is my neighborhood..I live here. I hike these beautiful trails five times a week. There are plenty of acres of
desert in other areas. People come from all over the valley to hike and bike here.This land has been set aside
for this and should not be taken away.
Sonoran Desert Drive is a safe haven for athletes and cyclists. It’s the one road in the Phoenix area in which
cyclists and feel safe in the road without the fear of being hit by cars.
We use the parkway weekly for our bike training, along with thousands of other riders. This parkway has forever
been a haven for riders looking to escape the dangerous city streets of Arizona, and bringing more traffic or
reducing our ability to use the parkway could result in a major increase in vehicle‐bike related accidents which
unequivocally result in harm to the cyclist ‐ often fatally. The proposed development could spell disaster for the
cycling community in Arizona.
There is already a staggering amount of traffic between the preserves and additional housing per acre only
harms these sacred areas. We are growing at a staggering rate and sacrificing our beautiful lands and existing
safe guards isn't the right approach to addressing this growth. The land and homes will sell and the only reason
to increase hones per acre is to increase their profits.
Page 479
I urge you not to ignore the Desert Character Overly District and over develop one of the few remaining
preserves in city limits so a developer can make more money. Please consider your constituents way of life and
safety over profits for a corporation. Thank you for your consideration.
I run on those trails weekly at Apache wash trailhead, I bike Sonoran Parkway road safely multiple times weekly.
If traffic/construction/and wildlife are destroyed it would be incredibly heartbreaking.
I specifically bought a home in this area in part because of the Sonoran Desert Preserve and the numerous
hiking trails available. The traffic has increased substantially in the past several years. The closure of I 17 in
either direction already turns our neighborhood into a parking lot at times. Sincerely, Terry
I live in this area, I use the hiking trails and bike paths along Sonoran drive on a weekly basis, I love looking out
into the Desert everytime and taking in its natural beauty it has to offer, Roof tops would hinder this…. If the
county/city ever needs additional funding they can have Police officers patrol Sonoran Desert drive and would
run out of paper giving traffic tickets, its already a race track with the driving practices on this road,,,,, more
congestion will make it worst and a lot more dangerous than itvis now, I quit riding my bike in the bike lane on
that road, I ride on the bike path to the north of the road for that reason…
Preserve land is sacred and should maintained as suck to keep the value to it's community members.
This development will ruin the last open space area around the Sonoran Preserve. There are plenty of other
housing developments in the north Phoenix area closer to I‐17 that will assist those moving to the valley. This
development is not necessary. There are also major water, traffic and fire concerns with this new development.
1. Concerned about wildlife being displaced and natural habitats being significantly reduced 2. High occupancy
buildings coupled with houses will bring more traffic and pollution and impact the infrastructure 3. Impact on
city resources such as water especially scary as water levels are so low 4 impact to education facilities ‐ schools
are over crowded
We truly need to preserve our Sonoran Desert and we need to maintain the original reason this area has been
preserved. We are rapidly losing our Sonoran Desert and our recreation areas, not to mention our wildlife are
losing their homes. We can’t be nothing but concrete. We should take pride in living in a beautiful part of town.
Please Preserve!!
We cannot keep moving the wild habitat out of their homes! Moving into this community we were told this
reserve was here to stay so we would never have to worry about build going up on it ‐ clearly, that has changed.
Do not let greed destroy our quality of life.
The preserve and drive are my little bit of sanctuary to and from work. I enjoy the beautiful flowers and desert
landscape daily, not to mention the gorgeous sunsets and sunrises I see every day. Please keep this part of
Arizona as it is.
We are loosing the beauty that was one of the huge reasons for moving where we live. All you are you doing is
bringing more infrastructure. I understand that growth needs to take place but I think that it should be done in a
much better way. Putting up a bunch of houses on top of each other is not the solution. I see greed takes the
upper hand over more intelligent decisions. Thank you
One of the reasons I moved to this area was because of the Preserve and being told it would not be developed.
How incredibly sad we're even needing to have this discussion. Please do the right thing and save the Sonoran
This preserve is important for the community and wildlife!
This beautiful desert area needs to maintain its character and uniqueness. It’s the reason why many people live
in the area. Stop!!
Sara Rovarino
Keep as much preserves and mountains natural
I want to keep the area accessable for recreation.
Page 480
We moved to our current home to enjoy the benefits of having access to the Sonoran Preserve. The Desert
Character Overlay District was created to preserve the integrity of this precious commodity, if it is ignored, the
beauty and recreational benefits of the preserve will be significantly reduced.
We need to preserve our natural habitat.Increased construction around the area already put too much load on
traffic and school system.We have no new building of schools and we are worried where all these will get
We need to save our desert preserve and wildlife. There are plenty if other placex in the area and in Phoenix
where it is more appropriate and less disruptive to build.
Save wildlife and the desert
There are plenty of other places to build, these this beautiful piece of land beautiful. Keep the traffic down for
those of us who use this area for biking. Oh yes, and where are you getting all the water to support all of this
new construction?!?
Please follow the Desert Character Overlay District plan. Keep traffic low and undeveloped land so we can enjoy
the preserve.
There has already been enough building along Dove Valley/Sonoran Desert Drive. Please leave the preserve so
that we can continue to enjoy its beauty.
I live around the corner in Sonoran Foothills community and one of the reasons we moved here was to be able
to bike on Dove Valley and Sonoran Desert, as we train for Triathlons year round. Every car you add to these
roads makes this more dangerous for us. I have almost been hit twice by cars coming out of Sonoran Gate
community. The proposed development of over 1400 homes will destroy this very special area.
Like to go hiking there and see the natural views.
The Sonoran Preserve is important to me because of the beauty if the area and the animals that call it home.
Sonoran Desert Drive needs to remain a less busy road so it is safe for the bicyclists that use it for exercise and
the people that walk the path along the road and preserve.
Myself and so many of my neighbors and friends hike this area on a regular basis! There is a nest that an owl
comes back to every year! There are beautiful fees of the amazing area in which so many of us call home! Please
don’t destroy an area we love and cherish
To be able to get out of the city and experience the peacefulness and beauty of the Sonoran desert so easily is
what makes this area unique. Once it is gone it is gone.
We love biking on the path along the reserve with our 2 girls, crossing Sonoran Desert is already a bit nerve
wracking with current traffic, I can't imagine how much this would increase given the added homes. This is such
a beautiful stretch of road and adding these homes would greatly impact the noise, traffic and beauty of this
area. Not to mention the surrounding grocery stores, roadways and restaurants are already stretched so thin
because the number of homes has increased greatly without the other resources to support it!
The increase in traffic volume that will result from additional development in this area is not sustainable or in
keeping with the objectives of the preserve.
Doubling or tripling the number of housing units is not sustainable and concerning that it will impact the
surroundings negatively
Increased traffic, depleted water, and loss of vital desert preserve. In addition, approval here increases the
likelihood that thousands of additional homes will be added throughout the preserve in years to come.
There is enough congestion and traffic as it is. Not to mention, our beautiful desert is continually being built in.
I am extremely concerned about over building at the expense of the natural desert. Loss of natural
settings/habitat, increased traffic, speeding, congestion, crime, burglary, all the issues that come with high
My concern is for public safety first and foremost. In addition to the widening of the Sonoran roadway and the
disregard for the serenity of the desert. Finally I feel the City is growing too fast with little regard for Public
Safety and infrastructure growth.
Page 481
I've lived in this area for many years and treasure the Sonoran Desert Preserve beyond measure. As an avid
hiker and lover of the unique beauty, plant life and wildlife of the Sonoran Desert, I feel privileged to be able to
enjoy this natural area as part of my "everyday." I'm also aware and incredibly proud of the hard work and
careful thought that went into preserving this land in the first place. It was a job so very well done, and I would
be incredibly disappointed and dispirited to see those efforts and safeguards dismantled in any way.
The beauty of the desert & also a place for the animals to live. We gave already taken enough of their home.
Enjoy bicycling through the preserve. The road is too narrow for the traffic already using the parkway.
My wife and I have a true love for the desert surroundings and this is what brought us to Sonoran Gate
Community. In order to keep the beauty of the desert, it must be limited to homeowners. We hike, mtn bike,
and road cycle throughout this area and with the more chance of new development comes the increase in
traffic. My wife was hit by a car while riding on the road because a driver was speeding and not paying
attention. With little to no law enforcement on Dove Valley Rd. Sonoran Desert Drive, it's expected for drivers
to obey the speed limit but that is not the case, we live here and we see it every day and we are concerned
about more development on a large scale to come into play. If your serious about appreciating the natural
preserves then we challenge you to show it and not let the love of money ditract you from what your heart is
telling you. I hope you please take a deeper look before you decide. Thank you
So many animals will get displaced from there natural habitats.
Preserving our beautiful desert and its wildlife is crucial. This is what makes this area so special and why many of
us chose to live here. This project will significantly add to the traffic and pollution and negatively effect this
natural environment.
Safe and beautiful area to hike and bike.
Please preserve this pristine piece of Sonoran Desert for the native flora and fauna and for our future
To preserve the natural desert. Traffic is already excessive. This area is amazing for bike rides, hiking & exercise.
Let’s keep it that way.
Beautiful, wildlife, reduced traffic : )
I moved to the area after serving in the military for 25 years because of its natural beauty and proximity to the
preserve. The building in this area has skyrocketed in recent years. Future development of the preserve will
only deplete the area of its scenery and overpopulation of an already strained region of north Phoenix.
It is one of the most beautiful areas of the valley. Please dont spoil it.
It is important to save the Preserve and Drive because developers and their need for more and more money is
literally killing the desert and taking away all things that are indigenous to this perfect State I have lived in my
whole life, born and raised. I have worked up in this area for 20 plus years and it has been so sad to see the loss
of the desert. The Sonora Desert Drive is something so special and one of the few places left in the Valley that
makes you feel like you are really in the desert without thousands of pieces of property. Please do not take
away the beauty of these areas!!!
The Sonoran preserve is just that, “A preserve”. It was specifically zoned to prevent this kind of development,
or any development for that matter. We use this area almost on a daily basis for hiking, biking and driving on
the parkway. If these projects are developed and built I will seriously consider leaving this area and moving to a
quieter place. These builders should look for other areas not designated as preserves to build their housing.
The natural desert is one of the most unique places and somehow we have to realize it is something we cannot
afford to destroy. I understand the need for homes and such, but please leave this area be. Please!
We need to keep as much nature untouched and beautiful.
The preserve was set aside for a reason. And the reason was not to then go back and develops it a few years
later. Leave the preserve a preserve. There is plenty of other land to develope.
As a cyclist, I truly enjoy being able to ride on Sonoran Parkway and enjoy the beauty of the desert. Over
developing this area would destroy our landscape. I truly hope that our city will choose not to over develop and
keep the natural beauty intact
Page 482
My family and I enjoy walking, hiking, and driving by the preserve and the planned Verdin development on a
daily basis. It is a highlight of our day and one of the only areas in Phoenix that people can enjoy the natural
beauty of the desert, because it maintains the desert character overlay. It would be very disheartening if this
beautiful surrounding area loses its desert character. I trust that members of the Phoenix city council will reject
the request to maintain the desert character overlay. Thank you.
It’s imperative to preserve and protect the wildlife and their natural habitat. This area is already exploding with
growth & traffic.
Please stop encouraging overgrowth. We do not have sufficient resources for the population growth. Let the
desert live. There should not be such things as zoning changes that crowd people and houses into areas to allow
developers to make money and walk away.
My husband and I moved into the area specifically for the trails and wilderness of the Sonoran Preserve. We
hike the trails at least twice a week with our dogs. Please do not allow more encroachment just for the sake of
making more money! I am a retired registered nurse and served the indigent populations and can't afford to
move again. Please stop this!
We live in the Sonoran Gate community. I’m also a cyclist. We moved here to escape congestion and enjoy the
outdoors. All of that is threatened with this current building frenzy. Why would we abandon the express
purpose of these Preserves, so carefully planned and uniquely executed?! And where are we finding a
sustainable water supply for this unbridled development? This is madness.
Destroying desert habitat, overpopulating an area not intended to. Negative effects on property value.
This area can not support anymore homes. We don’t have the commercial needed. Also, we need to preserve
the desert. That is a popular scenic drive and hiking area.
Protect the Sonoran preserve
It is a beautiful drive and I am sad to see they have done any development along this stretch of road. I thought
this was a preserve but it doesn't seem like it lately with all of the signs I have seen go up lately.
Preserve the natural beauty of the AZ desert.
People already speed like crazy on this road and I'm afraid accidents will go up
I ride in the Preserve and along the Drive four or five times a week.
We are already experiencing high volume traffic and with the micro chip company, the traffic will be
unbearable. I believe in growth but we need to preserve what’s left with our AZ desert.
Conservation will protect the wildlife. Driving them out of their natural habitat could put some animals at risk of
extinction. There are other desert areas/land that could be built on. Preserving will help reduce our footprint
and help reduce traffic and pollution.
Please adhere to the Desert Character Overlay District safeguards. We need space to walk, bike, play and enjoy
the natural beauty of the desert.
Keeping natural habitats for the animals that belong here. We are on their land and need to be cognizant of
that. Also, future generations need to be able to enjoy nature as it is meant to be.
Upon moving to my home in Sonoran Commons I was told all this state land would stay undeveloped. That was
a key factor in purchasing my home because I love the drive, but most importantly Hiking and biking. It was very
disappointing when the Taylor Morrison community built where I was told no homes would be and increasing
more homes and traffic would be disappointing not to mention destroy the sonoran desert further. Please do
not allow this to happen!
Maintain the natural open space in this areas Traffic congestion issues
My family hikes and bikes in this area and there is already too much traffic and disruption in this area. The traffic
on Cave Creek Rd. and Sonoran Desert Drive is very congested and getting worse. Housing needs to be more
controlled in this area to avoid infrastructure problems and environmental impacts.
Leave the desert un touched
We need to preserve it for the wildlife that lives in it and keep the beauty of the desert environment in tact.
Page 483
We bought a home in this area in 2009 with the idea that the Sonoran Preserve would remain a Preserve. We
and many of our neighbors enjoy using the walking, hiking and biking trails because of its serenity. Please don't
let the lure of developers'money start chipping away at it. The city invested a lot to create the trails and the
Apache Wash trailhead. Let's preserve the Preserve.
The traffic needs to stay low for cyclist and hiker safety. The noise pollution would be overbearing. I hike there
year round and the traffic is already too much. The light pollution and noise would bring harm to wildlife and the
flora of the area. Keep the surrounding area cool by adding no more concrete and asphalt. Please do not
eliminate the protections placed to keep our Sonoran Preserve, preserved. If you allow people to encroach on
the preserve further, you'd no longer be able to call it a "preserve." Perhaps the Sonoran Development, or the
Former Sonoran Preserve, or the Sonoran Encroachment. Not good. I've lived here 12 years and the preserve
gets more and more use by people who want to enjoy it. If you roll back these protections even an inch, people
will just keep pushing and keep pushing, until all of those inches add up to no more preserve. Stand strong. I
hope you get a lot of responses. Please do not mess with the preserve.
We selected this area to live, in part, based on the feeling of being closer to nature. The Sonoran Preserve
played a big part in that feeling. The loss of any Preserve open space or the increase in traffic thru the Preserve
will diminish that feeling. Please require all developers to comply with existing develop restrictions and do not
"lessen" those restrictions. ‐ Thank you...
Our family enjoys the scenic drive down Sonoran Desert Drive. I’m saddened to hear they already have plans to
develop some of that land. The dessert landscape and easy access to trails from Fireside are unique to living in
Norterra and I would hate to see that change. It’s already becoming over crowded up here and traffic is
effected. Please consider preserving our beautiful desert landscape.
Concerned about traffic on current roadway & effects on wildlife habitats. As well as construction dirt, debris &
trash.
Maintain the beauty and areas to hike.
We live in the area and do not need to have more houses built, apartments, etc. The traffic is becoming
unbearable, and to abolish the desert is a terrible thing for the wildlife and beauty of the desert. I enjoy hiking
Natural beauty
I moved up in this area to get away from the city, crowds and traffic, enjoy the outdoors to hike and cycle.
It’s such a beautiful, natural area. No more development!
To keep our desert preserves for walking and hiking viewing the beautiful scenery NOT more houses. I moved up
here because of the secluded area and the ability to walk to trails and trailhead. Traffic has gotten so bad on
Dove valley road. Bikers (I) ride this road all the time and won’t be able to during construction and after as
traffic will make it too dangerous. I personally don’t even feel my neighborhood should not have been built here.
I use the preserve for hiking. Get out into nature but close by the house.
Great hiking and exploring area.
Beautiful desert and shouldn’t be changed for housing
As a frequent hiker it is important to regulate traffic and protect our beautiful Sonoran desert ecosystem.
Primary reason we moved to this area from Houston is to avoid the glut of development and related traffic that
we had in Texas. Please let us retain the environment we fell in love with back in 2010.
My children and I enjoy riding bikes on the preserve and enjoy the open desert environment.
For the animals. We can’t continue to build on their land. They are constantly being pushed out. This earth
cannot sustain all the building
I am signing this because we would not have moved to this area had we known it was even possible for a
developer to unilaterally request a community density plan, carefully and deliberately produced and agreed
upon, be thrown out so a company can increase profit. I question the ethics of a company that would even
propose it. I question the ethics of a local government that would even entertain it.
I moved to this house 10 years ago to move out of the “city” and be near desert‐stop building so much up here!
Page 484
There has been enough development in this area. Stop crowding out the wildlife.
It is important to keep open lands for the wildlife in the area. Building way too much in the area.
Please don’t let greedy developers have their way!
The Sonoran Preserve is truly the most incredible place to hike, bike, and just enjoy the beautiful desert. Just
driving through brings my family so much peace. For it to be surrounded by dense development and traffic
would steal the joy it brings from to the whole community, as well as visitors who are lucky enough to see some
of our most spectacular views.
This desert area is beautiful and with more and more houses being built, this will reduce the amount of natural
preserve we have to enjoy. I love to hike in this area.
Keep the beauty and peacefulness of this special area. Protect wilderness and cyclists. Cut down on traffic. It is a
rare beauty we cannot afford to lose.
The Sonoran Preserve and surrounding area are why we moved to the North Valley 7 years ago. The natural
beauty and outdoor activities make it our special home. We need to manage and control growth so it will not
negatively impact our surroundings with excessive traffic. Thank‐you.
Enjoying the desert environment is something we need to protect so that we can continue to share it with
We moved to this area because of the beauty of the preserve and the desert areas around us. The area is
already congested with traffic and adding more subdivisions will just clog our streets, increase pollution,
displace animals and ruin the desert. Please do not let that happen.
Safe cycling route
Being able to walk , enjoying the beautiful landscape the LORD make.
The development will increase the footprint traffic and damage to these natural areas and habits. We must look
forward to responsible growth in unity with our surroundings and not just perceived revenues.
Beautiful hiking area and bike riding.
It's going to change the complete landscape of our community. I do not want an excessive amount of traffic.
We have lived in Sonoran foothills for 13 years. We have always loved how quiet it is up here and love the
beauty of the desert. Please do not build more homes and ruin all the great things we have up here!
The Sonoran preserve and Sonoran desert drive are such beautiful parts of AZ. If it is too crowded with traffic
and development it will be taking away from all the cyclists and great hiking trails.
I often go hiking in the preserve for the peacefulness, seeing wildlife, and being surrounded by nature. I bike ride
along Sonoran desert drive and feel safe due to very little traffic. I will be devastated if homes get built on our
beautiful preserve. Animals will suffer, people will suffer, and preserve plant life will be killed. This should not
happen. Preserve means preserve!
This is an essential open nature recreation space who live and visit the area. Protecting spaces like this helps
make this area of PHX metro special, sane, and attractive to so many who use it. It’s therapeutic.
It’s getting too crowded and we need to preserve this beautiful area. It was a purchasing amenity for us that
this preserve would always be left alone. Completely unfair being sold under these terms and then little by
little all the beauty surrounding us is rezoned and built upon.
No wanting any more home delvelopers tearing up the preserves. With the additional Verizon zone site there
will be to many dangerous EMF’s in the community
I live very close to the Sonoran Preserve. My family and I love living near the preserve because we get to enjoy
beautiful hiking and biking trails right in our back yard. The trails are clean, well maintained and much less
crowded than other trails in Phoenix, such as Camelback Mountain and Piestewa Peak. The Sonoran Preserve is
the reason we moved the North Valley. And we moved here based on the growth parameters identified by the
Desert Character Overlay District, which were instilled to safeguard the Preserve. Please don’t alter the growth
density plans, it’s not good for the viability of the Preserve and it’s not fair to the residents who moved to the
area based on the development measures in place.
Page 485
I believe it is vital to preserve the Sonoran desert lands. The more we build the more we push wild life out of
their habitats and into neighborhoods where they inevitably will get injured or killed. If we keep building on
these lands we won't be the Sonoran desert anymore, we will just have to explain to our grandkids what the
Sonoran desert once looked like.
I very much enjoy the drive through there. Traffic has already increased too much as it is.
We need to protect our beautiful desert. There are many other areas to build on so we can all appreciate the
scenery. After all this is why we live here.
We moved to this area to enjoy the beautiful desert landscape that it offers unlike many other Phoenix areas.
To destroy this beauty that offers hiking, biking, and general nature opportunities so close to home would be
devastating for my family, not to mention the traffic that it would bring. Our neighborhood is already being
robbed of its quiet and peace from the houses already built on this road and it’s use as a through street. People
speed through at 50+ miles per hour to the point that it is difficult for me to turn left out of my gate. I can’t
imagine the impact on this traffic should more homes be allowed through the preserve. Let’s keep this beauty
to enjoy. Things like this are disappearing from the Phoenix area. We must save this.
The safety of low development it brings to being active is a great outlet in AZ.
An agreement was made to limit the number of homes for the area, why now is it ok to go back on that. Will
bring more traffic and ruin to area from overpopulation.
I live in the area and my family and I walk, bike, and hike in the preserve daily. I also see all the animals who live
in and rely on the preserve.
It is my training ground. I spend countless hours a week there riding in the bike lane, running on designated
sidewalks & trails. It is regarded, by local athletes, as a safe stretch of road to cycle on due to the generous bike
lane and limited traffic entering/exiting Sonoran Desert Dr.
This is one of the most beautiful areas in the valley. The trails, bike lanes, and running paths are utilized by a
large number of triathletes. Not to mention the large number of mountain bikers. Keeping this area of land free
of traffic will ensure the wildlife can thrive.
Taylor Morrison is a horrible company, they’re not truthful and when the job is done your stuck with a shitty
house. I regret ever purchasing a home from them in this area. They’re is a lot of wildlife and having the desert
overlay taken off the this absurd amount of homes is going to cause destruction of the wildlife and their homes.
If we keep building on all this desert there will not be any left for our children and their children to enjoy. Please
It is a spectacular preserve and should kept that way. This area can’t handle the traffic now let alone of more
developments are added.
This road is a cyclists haven, and a beautiful part of the North Phoenix desert. Let’s keep it that way.
I am concerned about the volume of cars, traffic and safety. There have already been fatal accidents for
motorists and bicyclists on that road/area. I am concerned about ruining the integrity of the beautiful Sonoran
Preserve. PLEASE don’t let this happen!!
No need for more development eating up our desert.
To preserve the beauty and nature of the Sonoran Desert
When does this stop? We have a responsibility to our next generation of children to save our desert for them to
enjoy. Take the building elsewhere. PRESERVE what is left of our precious desert
Marcella Mccormack
The Sonoran Preserve is a beautiful area that lends this neighborhood a great amount of character and appeal.
Over‐development would greatly detract from this, leaving it just another sprawl.
I want it to remain natural. Don’t want more noise, development coming to the area.
Cycling and hiking in the area
We need to preserve our natural preserve, too many houses, too many cars.
The amount of traffic increase will greatly harm the ecosystem as well as increased foot traffic in this unique
Page 486
It's important to keep the preserve as it was originally planned for the future. There is a concern for water
during a drought in Arizona and the Anthem water table is low. That road is very congested with traffic and it's
only two lanes.
Save the preserve
I’ve lived in the preserve area since I was very little. We need to keep the desert a desert, our native animals
are continually being forced to co habitate with humans and it’s not going welk. Continue to give them their
space so that we can all live together without hostile interaction
We moved up here to be away from the crowds and we love the desert landscape And the air quality is better
for our son who has asthma
Save the desert!
We moved here 3 years ago. We knew we wanted this home when we were driving around the home and drove
down sonoran desert drive. We loved that the desert was so close to us, that we were going to live to close to a
preserve that our kids could learn about the Arizona and the desert right out their back door.
I use this area for cycling and running. Additional congestion will make it unsafe for these activities. We are
losing more and more areas where it is safe for recreation. The preserve provides safe space for recreation and
adds value in its current state to the residents of the Phoenix metro area.
Our desert is beautiful. There won’t be much of it left if it keeps getting built on.
We live in a largely unspoiled Area of the city. We chose this location for its natural beauty and remoteness
from the busy‐ness of the city. We enjoy the outdoor activities it has to offer without the noise and pollution we
see elsewhere. Please help preserve this area for future generations to enjoy.
The Sonoran Desert Preserve is a beautiful area full of wildlife and desert vegetation. We must preserve and
protect portions of our desert to keep balance in our environment.
My family and I love to hike this area, especially to feel like we’re away from city life and enjoying the natural
outdoors. That is one of the reasons why we chose to live in this area was because of the preserve.
I urge City Council to require Taylor Morrison to comply with Desert Character Overlay safeguards. We moved
to this area because of the close proximity to hiking and biking and close to nature. This is necessary for
people’s physical and mental well being.
Preserve landscape, Mountain View’s, prevent traffic
I prefer to keep the Somoran Preseve “wild” for all to enjoy. Please stop taking beautiful desert away from the
residents that moved here to be near it.
Please do not ignore the Desert Character Overlay District. As it already stands, the volume of traffic on
Sonoran Desert Drive is quite high and negatively impacting the surrounding preserve with increased pollution,
roadkill and noise. Increasing the number of homes built as well as the traffic flow will greatly diminish this
beautiful and precious land that was so wisely set aside for protection. Please preserve the Sonoran Desert
Preserve values. Once it is gone it cannot be replaced.
I purchased my house on the southern boundary of Sonoran Gate with the intent of enjoying the serenity of the
desert in my backyard. This expansion will teplace my view with a 6 lane high traffic road. The Scenic Dove
Valley road will also become increasingly busy affecting outdoor activities such as biking.
I really enjoy living near this natural area and enjoy the hiking and biking opportunities that are available.
It was designed to be protected. It is that simple. There is already too many cars going through that preserve.
My family and I hike at this preserve every week. I take friends to it, have had Girl Scout events, and even
volunteer to clean up the trails. It is one of the most gorgeous gems in Phoenix. In addition to that, numerous
animals call it their home. It is not ok to take that away from the people of Phoenix.
Page 487
While the continued expansion of homes and building into this area is inevitable and needed, the maintenance
of the Desert Character Overlay is important to keep the beauty and feel of this area. The residents who live
here moved here for a reason, and we appreciate the forethought that went into the Desert Character Overlay
originally. Please do not abandon this. It would be one thing if the builder were building reasonably priced
homes to assist with the affordable housing shortage, but they are not. This request is purely for the financial
advantage of the builder and the detriment of our community.
The Sonoran preserve area is vital to providing a habitats for all the wonderful creatures and wildlife in the area.
It also provides for great walking trails for people to enjoy and get exercise while exploring all that Arizona has
We love the natural area of Sonoran Preserve! Adding more homes is going to take away the beauty of this land.
We cannot allow new developments to destroy our desert.
I hike and bike there regularly. Maintaining “green space” in the area is important for Phoenix’s overall well‐
being/balance.
The infrastructure is not setup for a development of this size and the tax payers shouldn’t bear the cost to
I live in the vicinity of the preserve. I moved here to be close to nature and removed from the hustle of town. I
have enjoyed having wild animals pass through my backyard, but since all of the building along Sonoran Desert
Drive/Dove Valley began, wildlife sightings near my home have decreased dramatically. We are edging the
native species out of their rightful territory. Please do not butcher the desert any further.
All of the building is already over done. It's taking away any part of the beauty left in the area. My family does
alot of biking and hiking in that area and it doesn't need to be ruined with more structures. Leave AZ alone and
stop overtaking anything left. The traffic is insane. Why do we need more of it in the area?! That drive is one of
the last drives left near by that is ALMOST untouched.
There are plenty of areas to do future developments we shouldn’t marginalize the beauty of the Sonoran
I enjoy taking hikes with my family and dog. It is so wonderful to get out of the city and neighborhood to
experience nature. We also enjoy taking our bikes along the Sonoran Desert Drive to safely ride without traffic
and congestion. I do not want to lose this ability to development. There are so many other areas available for
development without jeopardizing the beauty that is preserved in this area.
The area should be preserved for enjoying the natural surroundings.
I’ve lived in the north valley for almost 10 years. I’ve seen the desert in northern Phoenix disappear and the
buyers of this land, though proclaim, they will do right by the desert, they have not. I’m a current owner of a
Taylor Morrison home and I can tell you they made multiple shortcuts and did not take care of the land. I
respect that Phoenix is growing but a lot of the glamour of living here is the beautiful desert not that far from
“town”. I would love to not have to travel further north to bloody basin or 7 springs to merely enjoy the desert.
Please reconsider allowing these desert destroying companies to continue killing phoenix’s charm. ‐ james
I visit the Sonoran Preserve frequently and enjoy the solitude the preserve has to offer more traffic in the
area would ruin the natural beauty of this area. Thank you for considering this petition. Curtis Johnson
Hiking and the overall access to the outdoors
It's a beautiful, natural preserve. It's a generous drive and the hiking and biking trails amid the serene desert are
therapeutic.
The Sonoran Desert is home to many species. It's important for their survival that their habitat isn't cut up by
roads and other development.
I love the purity of this area. Excessive homes will ruin the beauty.
Walking along the Sonora preserve desert in a safe manner is very important for my kids
Traffic on the preserve road is already quite busy during rush hour. Adding more homes will increase the danger
of the road and damage the beautiful desert.
We need to preserve the hiking and biking trails as well as the bike lane on Desert Sonoran Drive to keep it safe
for pedestrians and cyclist.
Page 488
It’s one of the few roads where cyclists and triathletes have a place to ride together without intersections. It’s
great for the community. I use this road almost every weekend
This beautiful area directly impacts myself, my family and friends, my community, safety, economics, our home
value. There will be a great increase of noise to our peaceful lands. Lights will pollute our cherished dark skies.
SO many negatives, would take me pages to list each one! My fam, friends and I travel roads immediate and
near the proposed area, the negative impact will be immense! Loss of life and property is unavoidable with such
grow! The immediate detrimental impact on the scenic beauty of the area, wildlife habitats and migrating
patterns will be detrimental. The scenic beauty of the area will be lost FOREVER!!!! PLEASE do NOT let the
almighty dollar destroy this area! There are so many other, much less impacted areas of land they can build on!
This proposed change in zoning will allow new development that will infringe on our recreational area. Zoning is
there for a reason. Please do not change it.
To preserve the beauty and conservation of the area, as well as safety for cyclist and hikers.
I’d be like to see less traffic and houses. This a beautiful area, and treasure our Sonoran preserve.
We moved here from Chicago to near a more spacious beautiful desert area. We've watched the traffic increase
three fold which takes away from safety and the beauty of the land. We moved her to be near the natural
preserves, hike, bike and enjoy nature. In the almost 6 years we've been here we rarely see the wild life we've
come to love no longer around. Traffic on North Valley is dangerous at times.
The Desert Character Overlay was put in place to preserve open spaces and promote responsible development.
Develeopers should not be allowed to bypass rules and guidelines. Please maintain the integrity of Overlay
safeguards for the sake of the future of our community.
I am concern about the beauty of the Desert Landscape and more concerned about the increase in traffic that
will be on Dove Valley/Sororan Desert Drives. Besides Verdin there is also the new semiconductor plant going
up west of us that will increase traffic. There is also 2 other new housing developments going up on Dove Valley
and also Sonoran Desert Dr west of Paloma Pkwy. This will also increase traffic tremendously on Dove
Valley/Sonoran Desert Drives. Please be concerned that traffic could increase 10 times the current rate and that
your plan to expand lanes is already insufficient.
It is a beautiful place to take a hike through and be surrounded by natural desert landscape
This is a designated Desert Sonoran Preserve. The established trails are used by thousands and the preserve
hosts habitat for Arizona wildlife including javelina, bobcat, coyote, raccoon, ground squirrel and many more.
There are a variety of bird and reptile species Gila Monster, great horned owl, roadrunner, gambles quail, Inca
dove, Cardinals, spotted whip tail and chuckwalla lizards to mention a few. This area of Phoenix cannot be
expanded into a legislated preserve. Too many apartments in the area has already increased crime, drugs and
traffic congestion. Any additional housing and apartment development requests in the north Phoenix area must
be denied. Respectfully, Bill Shackelford. Voting Resident
Since living in Phoenix this has been a place where I can get away to escape the noise of the city. Please don’t
take that away from us. For a lot of people, having a place to get away to is vital to every day life.
I love all the preserved open desert. If there are rules and guidelines already established for a certain amount of
homes built, we need to stay within that, and stop over building whenever a builder wants to cram more homes
Page 489
The Sonoran Preserve provides plenty of beautiful hiking trails and scenic views. Allowing further development
in the area would destroy that natural beauty, and for what? More man‐made structures? More roads? Phoenix
has grown plenty already. The city needs to focus on improvements to areas that have already been developed
rather than expanding out more and more. Expansion leads to more traffic, more population, more congestion
and pollution. I for one do not wish to see this grown continue unabated. It would become too crowded to
enjoy any more, and it would just end up looking like every other overly populated and crowded section of the
city. Please leave the Sonoran Preserve as it is. Honor the protections that have been set in place rather than
trying to cheat or work around them. Dirty business practices that do not care about such protections, or about
preserving the environment, do not foster good will among the people. It just looks like you want to make a
I moved here to get away from the high volume of homes and traffic in Gilbert and to enjoy the beautiful
surrounding desert trails and nature paths north and south of Sonoran Desert / Dove Valley.
Our beautiful Sonoran desert is truly a gem in Arizona. Please don’t let the developers for the sake of a greedy
dollar ruin our state for our children and grandchildren. If we don’t stop the sprawl now, who and when will it
We are losing the beauty and integrity of the area that makes the Phoenix valley iconic.
I have been hiking at the Sonoran Preserve for years with my son and my dogs. We love the beauty and the
feeling of being in the wilderness just a couple of miles from our house in Valley Vista. I know our area is
experiencing tremendous growth right now but I feel the area on the preserve needs to continue to be
It's rare coming from Vegas to have such a natural landscape. It's so beautiful to have natural landscape and to
have the desert wildlife around our home. There's plenty of other places they can build and they're building
now. Save the preserve and the wildlife. They can build somewhere else that isn't here.
People need places to live but so do animals. The Southwest has beautiful deserts and what makes this place
The desert beauty of this area is its most treasured asset
The beauty of the Sonoran Preserve will be replaced with urban area???? During the hike or bike ride are we
supposed to admire the houses???
Safe exercise and increased traffic would really diminish the roads safety
We must preserve the natural beauty of Arizona. The generations to come deserve to see the natural beauty
that we have today. It is also home to many of Gods creatures and sustains their lives.
Proposed area would block the migration of wildlife through the preserve which is likely its originally intended
purpose. Also, there is not enough water already….
I want to protect the many plants, trails and wildlife. Please don’t destroy this fragile ecosys.
Acres and Acres of land are taken from the wild life. Traffic is horrible.
Seriously? There is so much development going on right now with the chip pant being built, and all of the high
density housing going in around it, we don't need to get any more crowded. Don't ruin what's left of our desert
beauty. These places are where some of us go to enjoy some peace and quiet and escape the population.
DON'T TAKE THAT FROM US. DON'T RUIN IT!!
Over reaching of dwelling concentration will overwhelm the streets, schools and amenities. Full compliance to
the Desert Charter Overlay District safeguards should be fully adhered to.
I do not want the desert destroyed any more than it already has been, it needs to be preserved. I hike daily
along the trails from Apache Wash to Paloma Pkwy, the scenic views are being compromised by building, the
noise of the traffic is ruining the peace of the outside and nearing running me off the road as I try to cross to the
trails. It's insane the number of cars already and Copperleaf development isn't even populated yet. No more
homes to destroy the serenity and beauty of this area.
I participate in running and hiking in the area and treasure the natural beauty of the desert landscape.
I chose this area because of the preserve and hiking trails. We love the motorcycle rides through the area on our
way up to Cave Creek. I already think they are building too much and it’s going to overpopulate and ruin the
very reason we chose to live in this area.
Page 490
Preserving the open space, flora, and fauna native to the area
I frequently recreate in the area ‐ it is frequented by a lot of people. Both on the road with limited traffic and on
the trails. It would be detrimental to the foundation of the Phoenix Preserves to take away land dedicated to
open space and letting developers tear it apart. Developers can get land further out on the outskirts of town to
develop ‐ not areas already dedicated as open space for all to recreate now and future generations.
The city of Phoenix is running out of desert space because of so many large communities. Taking away the
beautiful desert or desert character overlay to add more concrete and asphalt among houses is deeply
concerning for Phoenicians, tourists, and the wildlife in the area.
It is a beautiful community! I love seeing people rude their bikes, walk, hike, ride atvs so close by but with more
housing it becomes impossible to enjoy the preserve. Save the last piece of Arizona the beautiful desert and wild
life in Phoenix!
It changes the whole landscape of our community. Every available space is being built and we are losing the
beauty of our area.
Two reasons: to preserve the beauty of the preserve and the hone of the animals living there. Second, is the
traffic. We are already experiencing new heavy traffic with our growth up here and adding this will increase it
greatly. I moved up this way because of the lifestyle it afforded without so much traffic. Along with the traffic
comes more accidents, which we are already experiencing, more congestion, etc.
This will affect the local fauna and flora and compromise what is supposed to be a protected ecossystem.
To preserve the beautiful views of the desert and maintain wildlife and landscape.
I live less then a mile away and it’s a beautiful area that should remain the way it is. We hike, bike, and drive to
grandparents house on this beautiful road/preserve. Please let it stay beautiful and let us continue to make
memories here.
Hiking biking wildlife and beauty .....reason why most of us live up here.
This is an important area to keep Phoenix as special as it is. In addition, the growing drought crisis makes the
option of further building less eco friendly.
The Sonoran desert preserve is admired for its standing beauty. Arizona is Home to tons of desert land scenery
that makes our cave creek town so special. Please preserve this land and build soemewhere else
I live on the South‐West edge of the Sonoran Preserve. I am an avid outdoors person that loves the wild flora
and fauna and am concerned about destroying the natural beauty of the preserve as well as the natural habitat
of wild life. I believe that we need to prevent this oasis for recreation and wild life refuge to be altered.
It is important to have open space for recreation and for the planet. We love mountain biking in the preserve.
High density housing is going to adversely impact what is left of the Valley’s open spaces.
We want to preserve the natural beauty and opportunities we have now to bike, hike and pleasant walking with
families and friends while enjoying the beauty of our Sonoran Desert. So please don’t grant permission to build
more housing communities.
This area is one of the only places in the Phoenix metro area that offers a safe place for mountain bikes and
cyclists to ride. The low traffic and large bike lanes are not found anywhere else in the valley. It is a staple for
many recreational athletes and outdoor enthusiasts in the area and should be kept that way!
Page 491
I am a third generation Phoenician and have lived in North Phoenix most of my life. I have watched the growth
of the valley over the years and am not opposed to progress but it needs to be done thoughtfully and
responsibly. This proposal to increase the number of homes along the Sonoran Desert drive is reckless and
irresponsible. The developers of the Verdin project are not thinking about the residents of the area or the future
generations that will use the preserve but are rather motivated by the lure of maximizing their profits. I am
strongly opposed to discarding the charter and hope that as our representatives you will do the right thing for
the citizens of this area. Seriously take into consideration what’s best for not only the residents but also the
wildlife and the desert itself. This decision will not only impact our quality of life but the quality of life for those
that will come long after we’re gone. A sea of homes and pushing more and more people into an untouched
area of desert is not good for the future of our community.
Beauty of the natural desert provides peace & tranquility in this world of unrest. Don’t destroy the zen
We have so few Desert Lands left for generations to appreciate
we moved up here 12 years ago because it was beautiful with hiking trails and not overly congested with
housing/shopping/traffic etc. please leave our sonoran preserve alone and stop building in it. if people want
congestion they can move into the city areas thank you.
The open space is becoming g increasingly scarce, reducing not only the lands for recreation but also the
My family and I value the Sonoran Preserve and open desert. We've lived next to and used the Sonoran
Preserve for over 15 years. We mountain bike, run, hike, and enjoy nature on these trails multiple times per
week. The surrounding open desert is an integral element contributing to the peace of the Preserve. We were
dismayed at the building of the neighborhood off Dove Valley Rd between the two sections of the Preserve a
few years ago. Please do not crowd the area surrounding and within the beautiful Preserve!
This area is important to preserve. I regularly use this area for recreation and it is an important reason why I
choose to live in the north valley as opposed to other areas in Phoenix. I DO NOT WANT THE NORTH VALLEY TO
TURN INTO CHANDLER OR GILBERT!!!!
My family and I love hiking in the Sonoran Preserve. It’s how we spend our weekends. We would hate to lose
anymore of the land, the atmosphere, the animals. Please save the land. Thank you
Preserve natura
We all know how beautiful the Sonoran Preserve is. Most of us in this area live here to live close to the city, but
still enjoy the beauty of the desert. As a phoenix native, I’ve seen our desert areas shrink…. Not only do humans
have less area to enjoy, the animals have less and less of an area to call home. This is not okay. We need to
preserve this area. While we understand that land is at a premium right now, there are other areas to develop.
I do not want the massive increase in traffic it is already horrible in this area. We do not need more housing
there are plenty already being built.
We moved up to this area because of the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve. Please keep our beautiful land the
way it is.
The area will not be able to handle the congestion of the cars that will need access to the area. Also there
aren't many peaceful areas to drive through anymore, especially when you have had a stressful day. With all of
the other building happening we can't afford to have another development take our land.
I am a resident in the local area and I’m very concerned about excessive traffic and congestion. We have laws on
the books to protect to preserve I don’t think we need to circumvent them now just to build more high density
The natural area surrounding Sonoran Foothills is a treasure. Doubling or tripling the number of housing units is
detrimental to the beautiful nature and wildlife.
We moved from the city specifically to enjoy the natural preserve and wildlife of this area. Also, we were
assured no building would take place along the Sonoran Preserve corridor. Our family loves to bike ride in the
peaceful desert preserve and request that it remains a preserve for our wildlife and for all to enjoy in it’s natural
To keep the nature as treasure and beautiful view
Page 492
We need to maintain the beauty of the valley. Areas need to be protected and respected so all can enjoy.
We are concerned about the traffic, congestion and noise that this increased housing will cause
GREED at its finest asking to ignore the Desert Character Overlay District... PLEASE DO NOT ALLOW THIS!!!!
Seriously...one more development along the route is no good. Too much traffic now for those who frequent the
area.
One of the main reasons we bought our house here in 2018 was because of it’s location in relation to the
Preserve. Already traffic has become a nightmare with the recent developments and removing the Preserve will
only exacerbate an already horrible problem. Also, to quote the great Joanie Mitchell, “you don’t know what
you’ve got til it’s gone.” Losing the Preserve would cause irreparable damage to the environment and the
We must preserve the Sonoran Desert for not only environmental reasons but for future generations to enjoy
its natural beauty. When I first came here in 2019 and lived near Cave Creek I would always drive out there and
take in the quiet beauty and the stunning sunsets. We need to protect keep this preserved and natural.
Jennifer Walter
Uniquely beautiful desert must be protected. Overly dense housing not consistent with that preservation.
This would allow too much development and over populate the area.
I moved to this location in 2019 to be away from congestion of traffic and buildings. I am already concerned
about the traffic on Sonoran Parkway/Dove Valley. I love the open desert and trails and lack of buildings. This
area needs these open spaces to remain as building and development is moving closer to the preserve on all
sides. Help save some precious desert/animals/freedom and peaceful nightblack skies!
Urban sprawl is harmful. Preserving natural pandas capes should be priority for the city.
This place is an amazing getaway for families to go walk, cycle and hike. It’s nice to go over there without all of
the traffic that goes through there. It is such a beautiful scenery that should not be taken away.
To prevent additional congestion and traffic and to preserve the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve.
We need to keep our natural surroundings for the overall health of our environment.
Will Ruin the wildlife and nature surrounding the preserve in addition to increasing the already challenging
traffic issues on Sonoran desert drive
This road has given me a safe place to learn to ride my bike, and to run. It’s been vital in my mental health,
creating open spaces like this is so key to us, as we saw during the pandemic. Please preserve it!
Cycling and trail running
The sonoran preserve is a beautiful place that is essential to maintaining the ecological balance for wildlife and
vegetation. The developers and owners knew the rules of the overlay district when they decided to develop,
and should be required to follow it. Not doing so benefits only them, and puts the damages on all other citizens.
Protecting preserve areas within an urban community is important and contributes to a healthy quality of life.
Respectful development along the perimeter of a preserve protects the integrity of the native area. I want the
desert overlay left in place as it is the legal vehicle created with intention to accomplish this. We need to be
forward thinking as we approve developments especially when they border preserve areas that were acquired
and built with significant personal and financial resources!
There is no need for additional housing in our area specifically so near a protected preserve. There is not enough
water so support the additional homes and businesses that come with a development such as this.
The Sonoran Desert Preserve is so beautiful and serves MANY purposes. That's why we moved here, and we
don't want to lose it ! We MUST keep development at a reasonable amount.
We need to preserve the area and keep the traffic in North Valley from getting even more dangerous.
Traffic congestion, pedestrian and bicycle safety. Preserving this area from development, as envisioned by the
Desert Character Overlay District.
Page 493
Becasue we hike the trails regularly and the feeling of being lost in nature so close to home is special. It should
be protected and I hope my daughter can enjoy it the same way one day.
Volume of traffic will be too extreme and hiking, cycling and just walking will be negatively impacted.
ASU has spent millons in studies, to this DAY, of the wildlife is THIS IMMEDIATE area. The area between these
two washes are a habitat for species that exist NO where else. Contact ASU if you don't believe me, they have a
professor that performs studies out there...they have for many years! In addition, the access roads proposed
are between two bridges that are TOO low. There needs to be a NEW study performed on how the destruction
of the plains will affect run off and increased volume in the washes! Otherwise, one heavy monsoon might wash
the people and homes away.
I enjoy hiking and biking in the area. Houses and cars really ruin the beauty of it.
The Desert Character is an important part of Phoenix that needs to be kept preserved and available for all
Phoenicians and other AZ residents to enjoy the natural scene this Sonoran Desert can provide outside of the
busy metropolis of the Phoenix metroplex and other surrounding cities.
We love our desert and the fascinating wild life! Lets all work together to conserve our beautiful desert!
The builder should be held to the character overlay that is in place to ensure the neighborhood fits into the
desert landscape.
As a resident living at Fireside, I have seen javelinas (up to a dozen at a time) and other wild animals come up to
our home looking for food and emptying garbage at night. By tearing down more natural and wild habitat for
additional homes will only increase the existing problems for the animals in the dessert when more of their
natural habitat is torn down. Stop tearing in to the natural surrounding preserve.
We've disrupted enough of the environment.
To much growth for what this area was set up to be.
I do not wish to see this beautiful desert landscape overcome with more traffic and houses.
The open desert landscape is what makes Arizona unique and beautiful. We need to preserve the beauty.
Its a beauty such a pleasure driving thru and seeing the cactus scenery. Already disturbed by the housing that
has already been built
1‐ more traffic 2‐displacing wildlife and plants.
Without a road plan for major increase in traffic and the current drought in AZ, I oppose developments like
We love the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve. Please protect what is left and save the beauty of the dessert.
The Desert Charter Overlay District is in place to protect the Preserve. We are simply asking to maintain
adherence to it. Other than profit, there is no valid reason to break the Charter. If housing shortage is an
argument, then investors should absolutely look to revitalize and invest in existing residential spaces.
The Arizona desert is a truly beauty that nothing else compares to. Large Cati with blooming flowers, mountain
ranges from every aspect, and wildlife that is crucial for our ecosystem; there’s are just a few reasons that make
Arizona great. WE ARE KILLING OUR SONORAN PRESERVE WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION AND HOME
DEVELOPMENTS. We do not want more homes, we want to save our preserve!!!! I want my everyone to be able
to drive down Sonoran desert dr and experience the breathtaking views that I get to see everyday I drive to and
from work. This is truly a special place and we need to keep it that way. Taylor Morrison can go find another
place to destroy if they want to make a quick buck. But I don’t want to see it here
I like living in the city with a place to go(the preserve) where you feel like the city is so far away. I hike, mountain
bike and enjoy seeing the wildlife as well as nature in general.
Ekosystem Preservation of natural wild life
Actions need to be taken to preserve the natural landscapes of Arizona. The degradation of lands is reaching a
tipping point. The area does not have the infrastructure, business, school capacity nor natural resources to
support this development. Corporate greed is advancing the rapid expansion of the Sonoran desert and we are
on the cusp of a major water shortages in the region. Enough, have some foresight for future generations for
Page 494
I think the peace and quiet and a safe place for the Sonoran wildlife to roam freely is vital. We cannot keep
pushing these animals out of there natural habitats. Traffic on Sonoran desert drive has already increased and
to increase it more is simply careless as families riding bikes will be at an increased risk
It's wrong to ignore our Desert Character Overlay District! We bought our home here because of these
protections, and we love our desert! Thank you!
Sonoran Desert Drive is a road I ride almost every single day. Having a safe road to ride on is essential to what I
do for a living. There are limited roads in Phoenix that have as much open space as this one, and it allows for a
safe area to bike and run (on roads or trails). Being a dad, this is extra important because all too often there are
unsafe interactions with cars on various other roads. Sonoran Desert Drive and it's surrounding area is a key
place to experience the outdoors in a safe environment.
We moved up to the area because there was space and open land. We don’t want to live where people are on
top of each other and traffic is out of hand. Don’t ruin our beautiful space.
We need to preserve the natural beauty and wildlife that call the desert home.
This city is growing so fast & we need to preserve some of the beautiful desert landscape. If we keep building
more houses, we will have nothing left. We don’t need more houses!!
We are overbuilding this area. Traffic, water supply, pollution are all contributing factors to limit growth. In
addition, the limited wildlife will be severely impacted
The Preserve was the reason we moved here 14years ago. The city should not be able to re‐zone and stick with
the original plan to leave it for hiking biking etc. There is plenty of land on the west side of I‐17. Way too
much growth, traffic, and Desert lost to developers. with NO regard for the quiet life we enjoy In north Phoenix.
The preserve gives us hiking trails and allows everyone to enjoy the beauty of the Arizona desert and wildlife. It
would also dramatically decrease property values for the people voting for you to remain in office.
Living in the development of Sonoran Desert I am concerned with future development and keeping the natural
environment. We need to ensure that proper development is planned to avoid over growth and increased
This project has the ability to set precedence for any other development. The fact the developer is asking to
refine for more houses and remove the desert overlay is a slippery slope to having high density homes stacked
on what is one of the mist beautiful areas of desert. It is too dense, goes against city plans meant to protect the
desert character of north Phoenix and will bring an influx of traffic to the area. Please look at giving up some
land somewhere else that is not across from a beautiful nature preserve.
Love the beauty of the area. So peaceful to drive along and see the plants and trees, which would be lost
forever with more housing. Please save this beautiful area for our children and all those who come after them.
I drive this road regularly and it’s already getting over populated with traffic with the current development.
More housing and construction will take away the natural beauty of the Sonoran desert preserve and will also
increase unwanted traffic.
The preserve to me is a natural area for hiking and biking. There is already a lot of traffic on Sonoran Desert
Drive making this dangerous to road cyclists.
I spend a lot of time in this area due to the beauty and the ability to get away from “the city”. I really love this
area and it’s one of the rare spots we have close to Phoenix.
The Sonoran preserve is a refuge for city dwelling people to escape into nature. It also, and most importantly, is
a sanctuary to native plants and animals. It's a critical part of the Phoenix ecosystem.
Destroying the beauty, and traffic concerns.
Once the natural land is gone we loose the gorgeous desert that many people move here for. Pollution has
gotten much worse in the past few years. More home mean more traffic and even worse pollution. The water
table is getting lower and more homes mean more water usage. We don’t have water for them!
Page 495
The Sonoran Preserve along Sonoran Desert Drive allows us close appreciation of the scenic desert and its
thriving ecosystem. Other parts of the valley are better equipped for growth and infill. We need to embrace
density where the city is more prepared to support it. This patchwork sprawl into the outer reaches of the
desert chops up the expanse of habitat unnecessarily. If it continues, we can only look forward to small patches
of desert brush between homes as opposed to miles of our unique desert that we can all enjoy.
We value the beauty of the preserve and feel strongly it should be maintained.
The Sonoran Preserve is beautiful. Any development should avoid damaging this precious ecosystem. In
addition, traffic on Dove Valley Road and Sonoran Desert Drive is already heavy and the 45 MPH speed limit is
mostly ignored by drivers. I worry that this roadway will not be able to handle the additional traffic from new
Traffic, keep the beautiful desert, water resources
I have lived in this area for over 16 years and am a native Arizonan. The City has done a wonderful job on
Sonoran Desert Drive, in terms of incorporating areas to recreate and enjoy the unbelievable desert scenery
within the Sonoran Preserve. I have hiked the area and marvel at the beauty. Increasing the planned housing
units by multiples of two or three will significantly detract from the area's beauty and tranquility and add an
unsustainable amount of traffic and introduce ecological damage to the area. There is a reason so much land
was designated as a preserve all those years ago. It should stay that way.
I believe there are multiple reasons for keeping our views for all to enjoy ‐ to preserve the desert and the
animals ‐ so we can enjoy the solace in this wonderful area by walking, biking, driving or just plain relaxing in the
outdoors. Also driving on this Sonoran stretch of road currently needs more restrictions ‐ such as traffic lights at
all intersections for turning. Much speeding ‐ need to have more monitoring of speed requirements. Adding
more housing is just going to add to a lose of the desert preserve and impossible street/road conditions. When
we built our home here, we were told that there were restrictions to keep our desert preserved.
I love being able to enjoy the beautiful preserve without all the traffic. The preserve is what makes city living do‐
Pavement is forever and we’re losing our natural habitats
I live near this area and use it all of the time. Love it! The area is getting congested already and it’s starting to
ruin this special area/space we have available to us to enjoy nature.
I am signing this petition for multiple reasons ‐ we do not have the proper roadways to support additional
housing units and want to preserve the beauty of the region
We need to preserve the beauty of our natural habitats. There are already plenty of places that are zoned for
building. Please do not let greed ruin our neighborhood.
The Sonoran Preserve is absolutely beautiful and filled with flora and fauna unique to the area. Sonoran
Preserve should remain natural for the benefit of the critters who live there.
Would like this preserved with desert lands as much as possible
I walk the puppies in this area and would be a shame if the sanctuary of this Area was ruining forever. Many
people enjoy the beauty
Preserve the desert hiking areas.
It is very important to retain our natural desert and the Sonoran Preserve.
Preserving the Desert Character Overlay District is essential for sustaining the quality of life in & near the
Sonoran Desert Preseve.
I am very concerned about the additional traffic volume that will be a result of large Verdin community. I am a
triathlete who uses Sonoran Desert Dr. daily for training and with the increased traffic I fear for my safety. In
addition, we moved to this area (85085) for the beauty of the desert. Abandoning the Desert Character Overlay
District will eliminate the protections that were placed to ensure conservation of the ecosystems in the area
while still allowing for some development. The large number of homes the Verdin development company
proposes to squeeze into this area will detract from the wilderness and beauty of the Preserve. Yet, another
area of concern would be the overcrowding of schools in the Deer Valley School district.
Page 496
The Donoran a preserve is a peaceful area used by many people for hiking, mountain biking and horseback
riding. Adding more houses will increase the number of people using the trails as well as create more traffic in
To adhere to our natural landscape and preserve the area and its wildlife.
The Sonoran Preserve is important to me to have beautiful open desert to see wild life, teach our children how
to respect desert nature and it’s in my backyard. With more cars on the road I fear reckless driving and fires
from through in things out the window.
I live on Dove Valley and the traffic is already horrendous. We also love driving "the back way" when we're
headed to Scottsdale for the scenic route. We would hate to see that go and hate for it to be filled with more
homes than are currently allowed (none would be the perfect amount in my opinion). The schools are already
far too filled for the existing amount of homes and the roads were not built for the amount of traffic that
currently passes through on a daily basis. There are so many reasons to not allow more homes!! We moved up
here to be away from the millions that live in metro and we'd like to keep it that way.
Beauty, Congestion, MTB trails
Please save the desert preserve, this is very important! Thank you
The desert in the Sonoran Desert Preserve is already quite overused by hikers, bikers and equestrian riders. By
increasing the population adjacent to this preserve, not only will it lose its true wilderness experience, but it will
have increased urban pressures placed upon it, threatening its very existence. Additionally, as I live just meters
from Dove Valley Trail and witness the already heavy traffic along this corridor that connects to Sonoran Desert
Drive, any increased volumes in traffic would effectively make it very difficult to exit my community onto Dove
Valley Road where no traffic lights exist.
I moved to North Phoenix because of the untouched natural beauty of the desert that hadn't been devastated
by "progress". Humans need areas of Nature to decompress and renew their spirit, crushed by the rigors of life.
Unfortunately, we lost an area of the Preserve, including the wildlife, to an enclave of large houses. It's
unfortunate that money trumps all. I elect people who rise above lure of the almighty dollar to do what is right
for the Earth and her people. Please honor the intention of The Preserve.
This is so important to protect the natural beauty, wildlife, ecosystems, and quiet quality of life that draws
people to the area and the state in general. Please act to prevent the potentially irreparable damage discarding
these safeguards could cause!
I have lived in this area for 17 yrs. and we are raising our daughters here. My family enjoys the trails and hiking. I
am also a teacher at on of the neighborhood K‐8 schools. Our school is busting at the seams even before all the
new construction being completed. You can't keep overloading the schools and roads to crisis points.
To preserve the preserve!
I mountain bike this area at least twice a week and do not want to see the area changed. It is already crowded
on the weekends
Living by the beautiful Sonoran Mountain Preserve area and Sonoran Desert Drive, allows people to interact
positively with nature and the environment. This is necessary for people’s physical and mental well being,
which we all rediscovered during the pandemic when it was one of the few things people were allowed to do.
The Mountain Preserve allows people to connect with nature and enjoy the peaceful outdoor environment. The
people in the area love the open spaces and serenity that the Sonoran Desert Mountan Preserve provides. They
walk, bike or hike in the neighborhood everyday. If these developers are allowed to over develop this beautiful
area it will be a detriment to the already established neighborhoods by increased population through clustered
housing, traffic, safety, noise levels, over crowded schools, and a host of other issues. This mountain preserve is
vital to the well being and safety of people who chose to live for here for a better quality of life. Please don’t
allow these developers to destroy the Mountain Preserve. Thank you
Bike safety Road overly congested
Natalie Karis
Traffic is already heavy and dangerous for my wife who bikes and myself walking
Page 497
Safe road for training and being outside.
When we moved to Arizona nearly 7 years ago, we chose the Sonoran Foothills neighborhood because of the
surroundings. We did not want to live in an overdeveloped area in more developed parts of the valley. We enjoy
our trails and open desert and do not want them further disrupted by overriding existing protections.
We need to build green and stop destroying conservation areas. We are at a crossroads and our choices should
be with the thought of future generations in mind. The next generation already has a lot of cleanup to address
ASAP to avoid climate collapse.
I am an avid hiker. I enjoy being able to see nature, plants and animals. We are already taking so much natural
habitat from desert life. Overcrowding the preserve area increases pollution by humans and their machines.
Furthermore, light and noise pollution create additional issues. Please conserve our preserve.
We need to preserve the preserves; that’s why they’re called preserves.
I’m an avid road cyclist and cherish this well‐paved, lightly‐trafficked road with a bike lane.
This is a great place to hike and enjoy the beautiful desert landscape. The city planners and council are ruining
the desert plus there is no thought of water shortage when these zoning changes are made.
My favorite thing to do is head out to the preserve with my husband. It is absolutely breathtaking. Until we
noticed the houses being built. And now you want to do more!!! No, building more houses doesn't add to the
environment it only takes away the beauty and safety of our desert wildlife and plants. At some point we won't
be able to call this area a preserve, we will be calling it a mini mall. Noise, air, and light pollution are what's in
store for us if building continues to expand. When will it stop, when there is no desert remaining? It's very sad
and I hope this idea will be reconsidered immediately.
Urban sprawl is unnecessarily destroying the last of our pristine Sonoran Desert and taking away the homes and
food sources of so many of our unique birds, plants and animals found only here in the world. The roads and
increased traffic to these massive developments are also harming our wildlife. Please stop urban sprawl and
stop these densely‐zoned mass developments that are not consciously designed to assimilate into the desert
environment, but rather harm wildlife, replace natural habitat and increase global warming. It’s essential that
the preserve remains what it was intended to be—development‐free and protected for future generations to
I hike there regularly. Open spaces are important and our beautiful desert is becoming too full of dense housing
I ride my bike up and down the parkway with countless other cyclists 3‐4 times per week.
As local residents, my family loves to hike at the Apache wash trailhead and the trails behind Sonoran
foothills/Fireside. My family’s Christmas pictures have been taken in the surrounding desert for years. All the
surrounding neighbors have the desert overlay, which is more important than ever with the water shortage in
Phoenix. If you plant the appropriate trees, cactus etc., NO WATER IRRIGATION is needed. Our trees were
watered deep for the first two years, then turned off. 15 years after NO WATER, beautiful and thriving. You have
my address, drive on by. PLEASE keep the beautiful desert overlay our Sonoran Preserve deserves.
I enjoy hiking at various times of the year on the trails in the Sonoran Preserve. I’ve seen an owls nest, lots of
birds, turtles, and cactus of all kinds in all stages of bloom. There is presently no noise pollution and the area is
pristine. I want it to remain as such for future generations to come, not just in my lifetime.
Preserve‐ should be just that preserve. Preserve the natural Sonoran desert as much as possible. This
development would not only take away so much of our desert beauty but also the wildlife habitats & wildlife
would be greatly affected.
Beautiful desert! Everything doesn’t need to be destroyed and built up
Page 498
Not only do I enjoy the scenic view along Sonoran Desert Drive, but I strongly believe our future to continue to
live in Phoenix depends on limiting new developments the number one reason being our limited water supply.
We are already in water crisis. How can we continue to develop and build and be able to meet our water needs.
This is scary for already established residents. How will my home value be impacted if there is no water? My
second concern for this development is how it will impact my home value. With increase in traffic, and
development of additional major roads right by my house obstructing views and increasing noise levels, my
home value will most likely be negatively impacted. My house backs up to the beautiful desert and as homes
continue to be built in the desert, our view continues to diminish. Lastly, so many animals that live in the
Sonoran desert will be displaced. With so many developments currently taking place in this area, the animals
have no where to go. We are destroying our habitats, which will further contribute to climate change,
continuing droughts, increasing fires making this location less desirable to live.
The beautiful hiking biking and walking trails!! What they are proposing is way too many homes for in the
middle of the preserve!!
I am concerned about the increase in traffic on Sonoran Desert Drive and Dove Valley roads. I would like to see
this portion of the desert remain protected.
I use the area weekly running and hiking. It is a beautiful diverse area with wildlife and plant life. Also concerning
is water shortages. The area needs to be preserved.
I live near this area and enjoy hiking the mountain preserve. I also enjoy diving through Sonoran dessert drive
to see the beautiful landscape our state has to offer without having to drive so far away. Please don’t take this
I love in the north valley and frequent the Sonoran preserve. Limiting building saves the aethetics of the
preserve and limits traffic.
I enjoy the beautiful views of the desert every time I drive on Sonoran Desert Drive. I do not want this land to be
taken away from animal species and used to build even more houses.
I use our hiking and biking trails daily and the added housing has added massive amounts of traffic and it’s
extremely dangerous for pedestrians and bikers not to mention the natural beauty and quiet of our desert is
being destroyed. There are way too many apartment complexes and houses being built up here. Its getting way
too crowded and congested and the litter is also getting out of control. Thank you for organizing this petition!
1. There has been poor oversight with planning roadways to keep up with the existing development in the
Sonoran area. 2. Sonoran Desert Drive is supposed to be a scenic drive and is utilized by many cyclists and has a
gorgeous walking path. The increase win traffic will be a further danger to cyclists and pedestrians. 3. Many of
us have to keep moving further and further out of the city to get away from all the Phoenix traffic and live in a
peaceful community. The existing planning with the “water project” has been a nightmare with construction and
took 8 months to complete. We already have problems with adequate water in our area and other areas of
Phoenix area under water restrictions. Where is all the water going to come from to support all of these houses.
5. Schools are already overcrowded and there is already a problem with staffing for school buses and teachers.
How are we going to support an increase of additional kids and families when we cannot support the ones
already living here adequately?
Too much housing buildout, need to slow down a little
This stretch of road is the safest and most beautiful stretches of uninterrupted roads for cycling in the valley.
Please save it
I am for protecting as much land as possible and conserving water.
Keep the desert the desert and keeping it natural where I bike and hike
I will not vote for an elected official that allows this to happen
We need to preserve the beauty of the desert.
We have enough housing in our area. Please keep the land open so that families can continue to enjoy our
Sonoran Preserve.
Page 499
I have children and grandchildren, outside the gates, it's TOTALLY UNSAFE TO RIDE BICKES, TRAFFIC IS
ABSOLUTELY 💯 INSANE WHATTTT IF IT WERE YOUR NEIGHBOR HOOD? Thank you
We moved here to be next to open desert and away from valley traffic. Increasing to the proposed
developmentm will eliminate both of these coveted features!
Quality of Life will be destroyed! Let us start with habitat destruction. Then let's discuss the water shortage.
September 2021, it was reported that the Bureau of Reclamation has declared a water shortage on the Colorado
River, which means that Arizona, along with Nevada and Mexico, will get less water than normal by 2022. If we
continue to destroy our desert with unnecessary development for the sake of the almighty dollar then we might
as well lift all restrictions. When will it end? When is enough growth enough? Maricopa County was the number
one county in the nation for growth in the past year. This needs to stop! We are destroying our human habitat
by allowing these developers to bully their way into these areas. Now let's discuss safety? Look at our Police
Dept or lack thereof. We can't sustain this ridiculous growth. Please do what you can to help preserve our
beautiful Sonoran Preserve!
This is a safe place to bike and hike. The balloons are beautiful to watch there. Let’s keep the open space
Already getting too crowded in the area. And the desert preserve is in jeopardy.
I use the area all the time for hike, bike and great out doors
Standards are acceptable as they are set. I have many safety concerns through that Corridor. This is purely profit
over planned and locals paying the price.
I know that growth in our area needs to happen but it shouldn’t be so much that it take away from the Preserve
and the reasons we moved here.
I live in Sonoran Gate. I hike Apache Trail.
We enjoy hiking, biking, and taking beautiful nature photos! Please don’t pollute our beautiful desert with more
needless building!
The beauty and sanctity of Sonoran preserve and the surrounding area is vital to our wildlife and maintaining
there habitats is crucial to these animals that are being continually uprooted by builders and developers greed.
Traffic is already increasing on Sonoran dessert drive and frankly adding more homes will make it more
dangerous for people trying to enjoy the beauty nature is already providing us. We cannot keep destroying
Arizona’s natural beauty just to pad the pockets of a few and bring in more people to an already overpopulated
area, where policing these areas is challenging already for our stretched to the limit police force. Stop building
and start enjoying the beauty that our Sonoran preserve is providing us.
We have so many current issues with water, traffic, maintaining the Desert habitat and nature. Each night we
have dozens of javelinas emptying garbage cans and in the yards in the surrounding neighborhoods. When more
dense housing takes place the displacement of animals and wildlife will cause more problems for existing
Phoenix residents. Thank you for not adding more units. It’s irresponsible.
Sonora Desert Drive is a highlight of living in the area, and provides a safe place to walk and bike near the
preserve. For those of us who live along the road, this is a matter of peace and safety, but for our wildlife, this is
a matter of survival. Allowing the Verdin development company to increase the number of planned housing
units would increase noise and traffic, endangering cyclists in the bicycle lane and make it unnecessarily
dangerous for the wildlife of the Sonoran Desert Preserve to cross the road.
The drive through the preserve is truly a beautiful drive. With more houses comes more traffic which will take
away from the beauty and wildlife of the preserve. It is called a preserve for a reason.
The beauty of this Preserve area should be PRESERVED. There is a reason why the DCOD exists.
Page 500
The natural landscape of the Sonoran Desert must be preserved so that all may enjoy its true beauty and the
rewards of living in the desert. It takes courage and decisive action to prioritize the natural land over
development yet it is a gift you provide to countless generations. Protecting the preserve is action toward a
meaningful legacy. Please honor the desert preserve and say no to more development in this rare and special
area of Phoenix. With hope and gratitude, Krystal Mazzola Wood
We moved here for the a handful of reasons, one of them was the beauty of the state. But that seems to keep
getting chipped away, literally.
We only get one chance to maintain the character of our community. Once altered, there is no going back.
What comes after houses? Walmart, McDonald's, Circle K. Build on the west side of I‐17!
I bought the house for privacy and quietness. The sound from the cars already are a issue, the amount of
roadkill is brutal and water shortages have began. Taylor morrison has so many issues with the houses in
Sonoran gate , they are not prepared for this project. Pollution and traffic is just not right in this area. Why
wouldn't they build on the area on cave creek road. It's open, houses have no issues. This seems the state is
taking money to push this project through. Who's paying for the roads and why would you put a road up by the
state hiking trails. This ruins the landscape !
I live in the area. I don’t want to see any further development in the Sonoran desert preserve area. I ride my
bike through there and drive through there frequently. I have already noticed how dangerous it is for bicyclist
and that road is becoming extremely congested. Adding a new development will only make matters worse.
We are loosing preserve land left and right. We need to keep the preserve the way it is. Plus not to mention all
the traffic and extra water for all these new builds.
My main hiking spot, beautiful views, would think u are out in the wilderness
Less people in the area
Resource impact and cyclist safety
Keeping the integrity of the preserve intact while allowing current hiking, biking, and traffic levels to remain the
Keep the desert!!! One of the reasons why I love where I live is the Sonoran preserve!!!!
Deserts are fragile environments/ecosystems and overcrowded land use will create problems that will take
generations to correct. Native species need to have their environment protected.
This is a safe route for cyclists as it has little traffic. More and more cyclists are getting hit by motorists all across
Arizona and this is one of the only place cyclists feel safe. It’s also one of the only roads in Phoenix where you
can see the beauty of the desert.
I spend a great deal of time hiking and biking there. The north valley is quickly being developed and it would be
nice to at least have this area remain what it was intended to be…a preserve. Thank you
This area is already over populated..the increase in housing will put a tremendous strain on our wildlife and
surrounding areas
The additional housing adds too much traffic for safely using the bike lanes and takes away the hiking and biking
trails that all surrounding neighborhoods use currently. Move housing to the west side of the I‐17 where
commercial land is being used and not recreationally used like the Sonoran Preserve. The fact that the area is
already called a preserve is reason enough not to build on it.
The scenery is beautiful along Sonoran Desert Drive and to see sections of it being developed for housing
projects will take away from the beauty that we have all come to love about this area.
We use the preserve for hiking and horseback riding. Heavy traffic volume can create a hazard for horses, even
at a distance.
Need to preserve the Sonoran desert. Too many greedy developers that don’t care since they probably don’t
live here.
Page 501
We need to stop doing things for the sake of the bottom line. We have destroyed enough of our natural
environment for the sake of exploitation, and disregarding something that has been set in place creates a
precedent for this to continue arbitrarily. People move their families to areas like this because of the
environment around them. If we wanted to live in the middle of the city, we would live in the middle of the city.
Allowing this to continue will greatly reduce and diminish the purpose & meaning of preserved & protected
land, as well as the ability by which we are able to enjoy it in it’s natural form ‐ mitigating the full purpose
We have been enjoying the Sonoran Preserve and Sonoran Desert Drive for many years. We go hiking as a
family and with my daughter's school all the time. The drive is so peaceful and beautiful. We were so
disappointed when some houses were built there and now more are planned. I urge you to stop this from
happening and keep the serenity of this special preserve. Thank you.
As a resident of a nearby community I am concerned that the traffic that will be generated by the proposed
Verdin community will present many safety concerns. The Preserve provides a tranquil environment that will
most likely change dramatically in character if this densely populated community is built. I don’t mind some
building along the route but only if it is not populated as densely as some of the surrounding developments.
Traffic along Sonoran Desert Drive and Dove Valley is already becoming a major problem. Increased traffic will
make for a dangerous situation for cyclists riding in the bike lanes. Also, the increased density of homes directly
against the road will affect the desert nature of the area.
I Treasure living where there’s hiking, biking and a beautiful drive that gives you serenity. We are slowly losing
North Valley preserves that are affordable to live around. I understand development is going to happen but we
need to restrict and preserve what we all move to the desert for. The beautiful Desert landscaping and
creatures that inhabit it are slowly being stripped away. An example of our desert being stripped away look at
the Legacy Park that was supposed to have been built and now all is left is an empty shell and eyesore to the
community. It has displaced options for the hot air balloons to land. Desert safeguards are put in place for a
reason why are we taking this away??
Please preserve the natural beauty of the Sonoran Desert. It is irreplaceable!! The proposed excessive
development will permanently destroy the beauty of this desert!!
It’s a gorgeous area that exemplifies the desert…and it’s close to the valley. Developing this area is a sad
mistake that we should learn that open spaces need preserved
Traffic and it will ruin the beauty of the area. This is corporate greed
We need to limit desert impact & traffic in the area as it’s already getting congested.
We moved to this area specifically to enjoy the natural beauty of the desert Hiking, biking, and walking is an
important part of the north valley lifestyle Please do not allow developers to ruin it with dense urban housing
Beautiful area! No need to add more housing to the natural landscape. Money isn’t everything.
This land is our closest access to nature. It is where I hike. It is where I take my children to visit the great horned
owl nest. This land is theirs—not to be traded in a land swap where a few people get rich at the expense of our
nature preserve.
I live in the Sonoran desert preserve. Since 2007
I would like to preserve what we have in our area and community!!
The Preserve is meant to be just that——preserved. Excess traffic, construction and increased carbon footprint
will endanger the flora and fauna of our beautiful desert. Please protect it!
We need to preserve the open spaces that attract so many to the area for recreation. There is a lot of building
of high occupancy units and housing underway. Schools are already at capacity, new services are being built on
Jomax to ease the influx, road infrastructure needs to be in consideration to.
Keep the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve desert beautiful with no construction expansion‐ there’s plenty of
other areas to build houses, etc.
Page 502
I ride and run at the Sonoran Preserve/Sonoran Desert Drive almost weekly. I’ve even stopped on my way
home before to run. This area is extremely beautiful and has the best bikes lanes I’ve seen. I feel safe there
and don’t mind driving the 30‐40min to get there because of how safe I feel riding on the roads there. If you
take that away from me/us where can we go to feel safe riding? Or running? Or mountain biking? Or hiking?
The beauty alone makes you feel far from the city. If you build you take away that beauty. You need to look at
it from a different point of view. Do you know who is out there? The ASU triathlon team trains out there.
Other groups do time trials up there. Take the time to go and experience it and see why we go. I can go up
there by myself, feel very safe yet not be by myself. I can’t say that about other areas. Don’t take this from me!
Desert preservation. Water conservation
As a native of AZ, north Phoenix particularly, I’ve seen the increase in population boom over the last 20 years.
The traffic, noise, crowds are destroying the natural beauty and peacefulness of N Phx. Also… the water! Where
will all the water come from to sustain such a population? We don’t want to end up like Anthem!!
Arizona is growing too rapidly for its own good. The demand for water is only going to increase with these
unnecessary expansions. Destroying the natural habitats of the wildlife that surrounds is also harmful to the
already damaged ecosystem. There is no necessity to continue to tear up the desert to accommodate an exodus
of out of state buyers. They can find a more sustainable environment to live, Arizona is already overly populated
and adding excessive traffic flow to an underdeveloped part of the city is asinine. Keep Arizona wild.
I prefer an environment that is a balance between housing and open land
The Sonoran Preserve is beautiful Natural landscape that keeps the heat down vs concrete, provides
opportunities for walking, hiking, biking ect. Many of the residents in this area including myself moved up here
due to these walking and hiking trails. Also, the traffic on Sonoran Desert drive is already bad and adding more
homes will only make it worse. Please listen to the residents and save the Sonoran Preserve.
Preserving open spaces is becoming more and more important as they are being lost at a alarming rate.
Increasing housing density is damaging with increased traffic, pollution and water usage.
There is no landscape in the United States like our beautiful Arizona deserts. It is critical that they be protected
as well as the wildlife in them!
I've lived on the north side of town my entire life and thr natural desert is why I continue to live away from the
noisy city. The Sonoran preserve has protection in place to conserve the natural environment and this
development is threatening that protection for the sake of the American dollar. We live up here for the wide
open space, peace and quiet, uninterrupted views and opportunity to enjoy nature. The traffic that's started to
grow is threatening this with speeders flying by at 70+MPH, endangering bikers, walkers and nature. Please do
now allow for more development than this preserve can handle and do not threaten the natural ecosystem by
Destroying the beauty and traffic concerns.
I ride my bike religiously on Sonoran Drive and bike safety for our cyclist should be a main concern and priority.
Our family enjoys the wildlife and open beauty that the preserve provides very much.
Natural beauty along with reduced noise, traffic and night lights.
Would cause an overpopulated area that is meant to be preserved for nature. Would ruin hiking and biking do
to the amount of traffic and would become dangerous. Would effect the views and the ability for people enjoy
the scenery. Would also effect the wildlife pushing the coyotes and javelinas into residential areas. Which they
belong in the desert.
The Sonoran Preserve area requires a much more thoughtful approach to any new development considerations
in order to preserve its character and value to all Phoenicians.
it's a natural treasure that is special and needs to be protected.
I want to keep it as is so that we all can enjoy the area and keep the daily traffic down.
Page 503
As a former 12 year resident of the Desert Canyon subdivision (32nd / Beardsley) I have supported the efforts of
SOS‐P since the rezoning signs went up. I find it deeply ironic and fundamentally offensive that the first ask of
the developer is to set aside law and planning already in place that ensures what they only pretend to espouse
(“ environmental commitment to raising the bar for protecting and preserving the desert environment”).
The drive along Sonoran Desert Drive is very relaxing and calming. I enjoy hiking and I would like it to remain a
desert oasis to enjoy.
Environmental protection of natural areas/habitats, reduce water demand, reduce pollution and traffic
congestion in this area.
We have 2 parks there, we need to connect these parks. People live here for the openness of the land. We need
more open spaces, not more house's.
We moved to this area because of the preserve, and while we support growth, the aspects of the preserve that
can be protected, should be. It is our responsibility to growth responsively!
It is vital to preserve true nature of Sonoran Preserve and it’s wilderness. We can not abandon Desert Charter
Overlay District.Too many housing will vastly destroy this natural habitat.
We moved here to not be so close to continued urbanization. We utilize the preserves regularly for hiking,
biking, and running.
Concerned about traffic increase and noise. We built our home in 2009 in Fireside at Norterra and have already
seen significant increase in road noise and accidents
I bought 20 years in area specifically for the landscape and to be outside the city. We have so many accidents
and fatalities due the EXCESSIVE TRAFFIC. We can’t handle the i flux of cars students business. Phoenix not
supporting all the builds! What makes this area so desired is the preserve!!!
This zoning would be uncharacteristic of the Sonoran preserve and city park surrounding the site.
ABSOLUTELY NOT FOR DOUBLE or TRIPLING HOUSING UNITS for the safety of joggers and bikers, increased
pollution, decreased wildlife, increased noise, and decreased overall beauty of this amazing area we all cherish
and wish to continue to cherish.
We need to have open space to enjoy hikes, trails, horizon visibility. We do not want the Preserve to turn into a
asphalt map.
I often bike on Sonoran Parkway, hike or run from Apache Trailhead. Having this section of town remain
undeveloped allows us an option close to home where we can escape our hectic lives from living in the big city
ant truly enjoy nature's unaltered beauty.
Multiple reasons. Increase of homes will cause 1.) Traffic Congestion 2) increase in air pollution and unhealthy
ozone levels 3) we need hiking and biking trails for physical and mental health. More and more people are
participating in outdoor activities since the pandemic. 4) Phx ( and most of AZ has a severe water shortage and
the outlook for improvement in future is dismal)
Too much housing buildout, let's slow it down
I love where I live and the traffic is manageable. The mountains and hiking trails are beautiful and right now
there’s congestion when I hike with bicyclists and hikers. More people would make hiking and the outdoors
troublesome for parking and just hiking the trails.
The traffic currently traveling on Sonora Desert Dr is already at a dangerous amount. Not specifically due to
frequency or number of users, but due primarily to their speed on the roadway. The current speed limit is
45mph, but traffic regularly travels in excess of 60mph. This in combination with the vulnerable users of the
road and the addition of a significant amount of vehicles is a disaster in the making for the roadway as it is now.
I would hate to see our beautiful desert drive spoiled by more houses. The Taylor Morrison subdivision was bad
enough. The road WAS a quiet area, great for hiking and biking, away from all the congestion. An oasis in the
desert. I live near there and it was such a peaceful drive, but now there is a lot more traffic on it and no one
does the speed limit. Building more houses will turn that beautiful drive into another freeway! Please don’t let
Page 504
I don’t want the desert destroyed to more homes. There are plenty of housing developments already going up
around us near I‐17 and the 303. Leave the beautiful preserve out of it please
Preserving more of the natural landscape is important. The Apache wash recreation area is a beautiful way to
experience nature and enjoy the area. More homes bring more cars and traffic and noise pollution, disturbing
the natural habitat. There are so few places left to enjoy nature and leave it beautiful. We don’t need more
homes there.
The Sonoran preserve is a natural heritage that should not be jeopardized in our beautiful state. Preserving our
natural resources is vital in maintaining our environment as well as maintaining tourism . It is a shame that our
government is allowing this to Happen.
I want to continue enjoying walking and biking along the Sonora Desert preserve in a pleasant and safe way.
Concerns over traffic congestion, safety, encroachment on the desert and wildlife.
To destroy nature in order to build more homes is wrong. We are speaking for all the animals that currently call
the Sonoran Preserve home.
When we moved from Wisconsin we specifically picked the Sonoran Desert Preserve area because it was so
beautiful and peaceful. Please do not ruin it by putting up homes there. It is a protected preserve for a reason ‐‐
to keep it natural.
I hike the preserve almost every day, year round. Exponential increases in large commercial trucks and
unforced city and state (ARS 28‐955) traffic laws related to excessive noise ruin the wild experience of North
Phoenix' best attraction. When the city pushed Dove Valley Road through the desert 10 years ago, I was a
member of the Sonoran Citizens Improvement Association. At Phoenix City Council meetings I brought up the
noise issue and stated that the city will never enforce the noise statutes on the books, because the police were
over worked and had more important issues ton deal with. An that was 10 years ago before the defend the
police movement decimated law enforcement moral. 10 years ago, City Council told me not to worry, noise
issues would be addressed. I knew it wasn't true a decade ago. And I have sadly been proven right. The city
needs to finish the Sonoran Desert Drive extension off the 303 as per MAG and the city's (so far) empty
promises from a decade ago. I have a long memory. And I vote. https://sonorancitizens.wordpress.com/
The entire N Phoenix area cannot accommodate this influx of new homes without increasing law enforcement
and fixing the road grid. The city needs to be proactive, not reactive.
The preservation of the Desert Character Overlay District is essential to the area, as to limit growth problems
such as increased traffic and desert destruction.
The Sonoran Preserve is a special and somewhat rare piece of Phoenix. It provides beautiful trails and vistas for
all Phoenicians within the city limits. As the city continues to grow I believe we need to preserve these few
natural spaces for all to enjoy.
We moved to Fireside Norterra area for the Sonoran Preserve‐ great trails, and the beauty of the preserve.
North Phoenix is slowly being robbed of its great asset the Sonoran Preserve and overrun by apartment
buildings, traffic congestion and no respect for the great natural beauty in the preserve.
I am concerned with the number of people packed into a small space. Not only would this increase traffic to an
unmanageable level but will ruin the desert in this area.
We love walking, & biking sonoran desert drive. It's nice to be active in that pristine desert. Please keep the
DCOD safeguards active
Desert overlay is in place to protect the area from over development. We use the preserve multiple times a
week as a family and more cars and will make it ever more difficult to access the amenities from our
We live in this area for its natural beauty and we do not want to lose that.
Page 505
The Sonoran preserve is a spot where I hike, bike and run 5‐6 times per week. I truly enjoy the beautiful natural
preserve this area has. The animals I see during my adventures is also priceless. I truly hope this petition
makes a change !
Concerned about excessive housing & associated traffic density causing problems & congestion. Please do not
override Desert character Overlay District guidelines
We love the beauty and tranquility of the desert.
I moved to this area because it's next to nature areas. Building in this area will encroach on the preserve.
I love hiking and biking the road and preserve. This is a great N Valley treasure!!
This area needs to be preserved as originally designed in order for the members of this community to enjoy a
place to get away from all the over development.
We have already encroached & displaced our very important desert wildlife, my hope is to prevent further
destruction of our desert ecosystem. I enjoy hiking, less pollution, nature and safety within our preserve. Please
keep it that way.
We are in a huge water shortage all over the country and building in our preserves just takes more resources
that we all need to survive!
Why destroy a beautiful, well loved, piece of land when we already have too many houses.
Too many homes encroach on water supply, room for our native animals, will need road expansion which takes
awake from our desert, will increase risk to bikers and others who visit the area to enjoy the beauty.
It is important to me to keep our beautiful desert open and the way nature intended it to be. We are the desert
southwest and everyone should be able to enjoy the beautiful scenery. It does not do anything or anyone any
good to fill it with homes and commercial properties that would only increase traffic, smog, trash and unwanted
things. Our desert animals need their home and do not need to be pushed out due to unwanted construction.
Preserving natural areas and wildlife
Please! We must protect our desert land. For the animals, the plantation, the beauty.
I moved here in 2007 to be near this great preserve and to live I. A quiet community. Adding this much housing
developments will forever impact this natural environment
We need to keep as much of the natural habitat in this area as possible for the enjoyment of all residents and
I hike on the trails of the Sonoran Preserve many times a week, enjoying the beauty of the untouched desert. It
would diminish the quality of the experience by adding more and more housing developments to the view.
Overcrowding is harmful to animals and to people. There are already too many car accidents due to the current
road infrastructure doesn’t support the number of people in this area. Therefore, more growth in this area will
lead to higher traffic volumes and increased car accidents. Thank you for this opportunity to voice my concern.
Greg Laursen
Tjhis is the last strip of Sonoran Desert left in Phoenix. I'm sorrythe preserve doesn't border Dove Valley. Whats
done is gone do not make it worse by 3X the number of people
The Phoenix metro area is quickly consuming our natural wildlife. The Sonoran preserve and areas around the
preserve are blessings to those near them. An escape from the overgrowth of population.
1) safety of those running, biking, and walking. 2). Nature is truly the reason we moved to this area and it is
vital we protect the preserve from being overly developed and disturbing the wildlife in our area more than it
already has been.
Ignoring the guidance set forth by the desert character overlay district would irreparable harm wildlife habitat
and the wilderness essence of the preserve. Additionally, the increased traffic will add more congestion and
safety issues to an already taxed road system, further reducing the usability for recreational activities.
I would like to preserve the wildlife. Also, the road was not built to accommodate that much traffic.
I love to hike the trails with my dog and my family. It is often the only exercise my aging parents get.
Page 506
Living in Desert Vistas subdivision since it's existence 15yrs ago has been an absolute blessing and we expect to
keep it that way. With that, we enjoy hiking, biking and walking frequently all year around. Over time the
"preserve" area has seen a HUGE increase in vehicles, accidents, speeding, crime, pollution & noise to name just
a few. Our understanding has always been that no further housing/development of any kind would continue
past our subdivision into the Sonoran Preserve. That certainly did not happen. Sonoran Desert Drive is so busy
NOW that adding additional housing will not only threaten people but the natural terrain and wildlife habitat.
That's a resounding NO WAY!
As a resident here, we need to preserve our natural habitat. You need to think about building more schools
before taking over the desert preserve and destroying the ecosystem just so you can make some builders happy
through these deals. If we can't preserve our "Preserve", then what is even the point?
There are many other places to develop. None of those areas are as “Arizona Natural” as the Sonoran Desert
area. Preserve this area for people to enjoy not trash with developments.
The Sonoran Desert Preseve is a beautiful desert area with amazing trails and gorgeous desert. This is an area
full of wildlife. A space that wildlife calls home. So much development has already overrun nature and driven
wildlife out to other areas. We need to the save what desert we can. I grew up in Cave Creek and the growth in
the city as well as surrounding areas has created a space I no longer recognize. Please preserve the areas we can
and preserve the quality of the area as well as the quality of life for the wildlife that we are already driving out.
Sonoran Desert Drive & surrounding preserve area can not accommodate traffic volume due to proposed Verdin
development.
I firmly feel that natural areas have to be maintained and protected in order to maintain the beauty and balance
of our communities. Doubling or tripling the traffic on the Sonora Parkway within the areas of the Preserve will
most definitely create safety issues with cycling and walking for all folks wanting to enjoy the beauty of the
Councilman Waring, please continue to protect the Sonoran Preserve.
The reason we moved here was the beauty and tranquility of the desert. We were not aware of the proposed
‘city like’ community Verdin wishes to build.
Traffic is already becoming very busy along Sonoran Desert Drive. Many large trucks are using this now too. We
were told this area was supposed to preserve the Sonoran Desert. Many people use the bike paths and hiking
paths. I feel it would become more dangerous to use these paths with the increase of doubling or tripling traffic
with the increased number of homes they are asking for. Keep the same number of homes it was originally
Keep some of Phoenix beautiful and preserving the desert beauty. The Phoenix police department can not
handle the calls for service right now how will they handle more traffic.
Keeping the natural desert habitat is better for the environment.
I purchased my home in Sonoran Foothills in 2010 primarily because of the desert character overlay and how
the neighborhood blends in with the natural surroundings. I moved to this area because of the desert character
and would like it to stay that way as it expands.
I wish to preserve the Sonara Preserve as it is and prevent the reckless encroachment by developers to rob the
community of this precious resource we all enjoy.
I don't want all of North Phoenix to become covered by housing and businesses, we need to preserve Arizona's
beauty!
Because of the natural beauty and I don't want anymore traffic...it has gotten worse over the last few years.
As a 4th generation native Arizonan, I adore our beautiful desserts and believe we must take great care in
unbridled expansion of urban growth. This project would place a huge strain on the perserve area, parkway,
noise, and environmental elements.
The beauty of living in Phoenix is having the ability to have open spaces for not only the wildlife but also the
citizens to use the land the way it was intended. There are plenty of other places to build and expand without
overcrowding the desert areas.
Page 507
I live in the Sonoran desert north of Phoenix, Don’t want it destroyed by continuing building. Leave it in it’s
natural state, so we can enjoy the desert for generations please .
We purchased our home in this area largely because of the preserve. The opportunities it provides for hiking
and biking with reduced traffic (which has increased since we moved) were also key factors.
I hike and trail run in the preserve at least five times a week since I live within walking distance to the Vista
trailhead. It is a beautiful and relaxing and meditative time for me believe it should be left as is like, as I
understand the story, the original owner wanted it to stay, which I agree with.
There are limited resources that we can all share and enjoy. The Desert Character Overlay District was
established to allow for growth but also to protect our wonderful desert. We are responsible for the
stewardship of this desert for future generations.
Need to preserve as much of our beautiful mountains as possible
If we keep building, there will be no desert to enjoy for us as humans, but even more crucially, we are displacing
and endangering the species whose habitats were destroy. Give the planet a chance. Let’s not be the reason
I hike in the preserve almost daily, and would like to continue to enjoy the nature and the solitude. There are so
many other areas to build along the I‐17 corridor, so why cause more damage to the beautiful Arizona desert
and the wildlife living there. I used to hike Thunderbird, but that's a couple foothills with development all
around, whereas the Sonoran Preserve is just that ‐ a preserve to protect wildlife and allow people to enjoy
nature. Please don't allow any more development of the land!
I moved here because of the nature. I grew up in the country and this was as close to it as I could get. I love the
nature and the quiet that we all paid premium dollar for as well
Me and my friends use that area to ride our bicycles and hike and just enjoy the desert and it would be
dangerous with it a lot more traffic out that way and it will destroy the beautiful desert environment please do
I have lived in this area for twenty years and it is getting so crowded and overbuilt. We must preserve open
outdoor space for people to enjoy the peace of the desert and recreation areas that are our Arizona treasures
we use it weekly for hiking and dog walking please please don't ruin this!
The Sonoran Preserve and Sonora Desert Drive must under all circumstances remain intake and undisturbed
There have been to many accidents and deaths.
Area should remain as it is. Area is also over populated with new homes and congestion with traffic.
I understand that growth is inevitable, but we need to be smart about it. There needs to be a balance of large
homes, apartments, and smaller homes. There have been hundreds of apartment spaces built west of this area
and the increase in traffic has been considerable in the past 5 years. I urge the council to consider keeping this
balance on the north end of the city.
I drive that way home from work most days and also hike in that area.
I am an avid mountain and road cyclist in THIS area, especially! I also hike and run in the preserve. Safe to say I
am absolutely for the preservation of the Sonoran Preserve. I live in an area very near where a housing
development is under way and the amount of houses being built will be over double what was originally zoned.
Please let those that run the show consider the longer (negative) lasting impacts of high‐density development to
what we have all found profoundly beautiful and desiring of this area; the Sonoran Desert!
This would forever destroy the natural landscape and open the door to even more urban sprawl. Please vote NO
Page 508
Being surrounded by the Sonoran Desert Preserve is probably the biggest reason that we built the house that
we live in now. It is just so beautiful to be able to drive home after a long day's work and enjoy God's creation at
it's finest. It is truly breathtaking and spectacular. Many people flock to Apache Wash Trailhead recreational
area to enjoy this beautiful natural setting through hiking and mountain biking. It would be a travesty to
overpopulate this area and ruin the enjoyment of the preserve for generations to come. It just wouldn't be the
same. Not to mention the destruction of the natural habitat of so many desert creatures that make the preserve
their home. I witness this first hand while living in the Sonoran Gate Community. These animals do not deserve
to be displaced and have their homes destroyed. The line has to be drawn somewhere in order to maintain a
level of natural beauty in our urban areas. This seems like as good a time as any to make a conscious decision to
halt the human encroachment on the habitat of all of God's innocent creatures and keep this little slice of
This area was set aside to preserve nature and all her beauty. yes the land is very valuable but so is central park
in New York. Preserve means exactly that PRESERVE
We love going to the preserve as a family, and having another major development project will only bring more
traffic, noise, and wildlife displacement. We need to do better and protect our wildlife and say no to money
Preserving the preserve ‐ wildlife Traffic and then needed retail to support the development Overdevelopment
of this area
Please leave the reserve as is, for the sake and beauty of our neighborhood and for the well‐being of the
As a local real estate agent, I understand the need for more housing in the metro area. But there are many
other locations that are not in the middle of a preserve. Outdoor recreation and the beauty of the Sonoran
Desert are reasons why people relocate to the area or purchase vacation homes. Having the preserve remain a
preserve and not another housing project is vital to our community.
I use the preserve at least 3 times a week for fitness. Mountain biking, hiking, and trail running. Wildlife
encounters are always beautiful and their habitat must be preserved. The human population density in this area
is already getting to be more than what it can sustain.
The Sonoran Preserve was one of the most important reasons we purchased a house in this area. To continually
chip away at this wonderful area would be so detrimental to the wildlife that live there as well as the wonderful
hiking trails that allow people to get out and experience nature at its finest. I am strongly against ruining
anymore of the Preserve.
My family and I enjoy this land and don’t want to see this over crowded We use this nature and Beautiful
preserve in north Phoenix area.
I see SOME development as good. Let others enjoy the beauty we have set aside in this area. Increasing the
density of homes is merely corporate profit seeking. Original density plans were thoughtfully put in place to
protect these areas.
Have you seen how beautiful this portion of metro‐ Phoenix is. We absolutely do not need more and more and
more. We have enough people streaming into our state already, no need to encourage more.
As someone who regularly drives, hikes, and bikes this area, it’s important to me, my family, my community,
and Phoenix at large to protect these kind of “open/brown/green spaces”. There are plenty of places around
Phoenix for development ‐ the Sonoran Preserve should not be one of them.
The beauty and quiet of the desert and the Mountain views are priceless. This is why I live in Arizona. The clean
air and the wild life are amazing. The wilderness of the preserve needs to be maintained.
Use that area to bike the trails. Want to keep the space natural beauty not filled with homes.
I love the desert landscape, and enjoy hiking on my time off work. I see the amount of buildings that are being
constructed and the traffic it is creating. Please do not destroy the little bit of desert that exists in this large city,
the habitat of our beloved desert animals.
Page 509
The reason why I'm signing this petition. We are over developing because we have all these people moving from
other states . We are destroying our beautiful desert to please all these greedy business people to put more
money in their pockets.
I enjoy the hiking and the views
Original safeguards put in place by longtime developers who created the Preserve and associated housing
(Sunbelt Construction). They balanced the housing needs with need to create liveable areas that honored the
fragile desert. This request for increased density is about money and is unnecessary for a profitable develoment
effort. Everyone needs to get paid for their work, including developers, but respect for the fragile ecosystem
and desired lifestyle in the north valley is also required. Profits are fine and were factored into the original deal.
Aaron Cushner
My friends and family and their pets walk there every day! Also it’s called a PRESERVE!!! Preserve it!
It’s a beautiful area to walk or hike or bike and it’s the last area I know of that is close to me. Otherwise I’d have
to drive over 40 minutes to find a preserve that is wild and natural
We need to keep the open land and what makes our area great.
I live directly adjacent to the open desert by the Sonoran Desert Preserve, just off Sonoran Desert Parkway. We
regularly see wildlife, and hear coyotes on a nightly basis. This is a fragile and important ecosystem, and is a
hallmark of the beauty of Arizona’s natural desert landscape. If it disappears, it will destroy this magnificent
aspect of what makes Arizona such a great place to live. For my family, the day the bulldozers show up to tear
down the majestic Saguaro’s to make room for concrete & asphalt, is the day we sell and move away.
This drive is very vital for bikers and the natural trails and parks the residents across the city come to enjoy. The
new development across the dedicated Sonoran landscape is going to spoil everything and increase the safety
concerns on the biking corridor. This corridor is used by Olympic gold medal winners , Tour de France
I have lived in Sonoran Foothills for 15 years. I do not want to see my beautiful natural desert destroyed. I like
living in a quiet and not so busy area of town. I would be devastated if Sonoran desert drive turns into another
freeway right next to my house. I specifically moved in this area to get away from the noise and traffic. The
natural wildlife here will also be destroyed which part of the character of this area.
Concerned about too much growth and traffic. Moved up here in 2005 for the beautiful open Sonoran Desert.
Absolutely do not want to see that all developed ‐ we do not need anymore housing or apartments.
The growth in this area is already at an all time high. This small area of desert PRESERVE is why many of us
moved to the area. The PRESERVE is used by hikers and bikers as a beautiful getaway that is in our backyard.
Every other inch has already been developed by apartment complexes. Enough!! Leave our PRESERVE alone!!
It is a beautiful area that has many trails for hiking, biking, geo caching and just getting away from the hustle of
the Valley. It is already limited in access and putting more homes will just congest that. It is also ruining the
animals natural habitat to continually uproot them for a dollar.
I live next to this area and have seen how developments have led to negative effects to the desert. A substantial
increase of houses will amplify this cause irreversible damage to the area.
I have been running and riding out in this preserve for nearly a decade. As I start to see more developing, it
becomes less safe to be active out there.
Increased traffic would make the area around the preserve much more unsafe. We enjoy walking around the
preserve with our children, as well as hiking on the trails. Please do not lift the restrictions on building in this
beautiful area.
Everywhere near Sonoran preserve and desert drive constructions are happening, it’s a very beautiful hike place
to enjoy quality time with family and friends, as a neighborhood resident I would like to keep it beautiful and
not have homes after homes getting built there… there are hardly any community park getting built in the area..
We need to preserve the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve.
Page 510
This is a beautiful and vibrant part of our community. Don’t destroy it by adding additional residential
development. Once those houses get in there, they are going to be complaining and advocating for commercial
development because they don’t want to drive 20 minutes to shops and restaurants. Before we know it, all of
the preserve will be gone. The hiking trails, the nature, and the area is pristine.
I live in Sonoran Gate. Moved here to be by my sons. One lives in Sonoran Gate also (6 houses away). We
moved here for the beauty and serenity of the desert preserve. Our hope was to continue to grow our family
and ensure our next generation will also have the opportunity to enjoy the beauty of this area. Hot air Balloons
and bike riders every morning. It’s a place of beauty, calmness and peace. Please do not destroy this gift. Thank
My family enjoys the protected preserve and allows us to partake in outdoor activities near home, safely with
our tons of traffic. The noise and light pollution will affect the natural wildlife around. Most importantly the
infrastructure can not support the proposed project.
I am concerned about the exponential traffic increase on the only road in and out of this area with only a single
lane in each direction for a majority of total distance. I remember pre‐Covid that the intersection at Cave Creek
and Sonoran Desert Drive would back up a mile deep during morning rush hour, waiting for people to turn
either left or right. What will happen when the traffic significantly increases? Plus there is only one way in and
one way out of this area. It seems irresponsible to deliberately increase traffic this much without a major
infrastructure change BEFORE the bulldozers come!
I love nature and wanna do my part to preserve the nature where I live. Please control the growth around the
Sonoran Preserve.
This pristine desert area should not be developed, it needs to be PROTECTED.
I enjoy the tranquil drive along Sonoran drive and being able to bike along the road without too much traffic.
The hiking is second to none. I would hate for it to turn into just another neighborhood with traffic and crime
I love hiking in the preserve. Anyone who intends on building anywhere close to it needs to follow the rules.
Our desert is at risk. We need you to protect it by requiring the builder to do the right thing.
Development needs to factor in impact on water and other resources. Water in particular, is a finite resource!
Quality of life is one of the overriding factors in why we chose to live here. The natural beauty of this area will
be severely impacted by further development as will our quality of life. Please put Arizona first!
I love driving on the Sonora Desert Dr. and seeing our beautiful desert. I and my family members also enjoy
hiking and biking on the trails.
Would love to keep this scenic drive the way it is. Scenic.
Traffic concerns and safety for cyclists along SDD.
The Sonoran Preserve is vital to our ecosystem. Without it, the natural biome will be destroyed and the quality
of life for all living things (including the humans) will be degraded, possibly beyond repair. Environmental impact
studies show that further encroachment and development will make the area unsustainable for a thriving
community and eventually, totally unlivable.
The Sonoran Desert Drive is a beautiful natural area that needs to be preserved for future generations. There
are plenty of other places to develop closer to the I‐17
I moved here for the beauty around me offered by the preserve. over the past 5 years I have seen that beauty
disappearing as more and more developments have sprung up without any regard to preservation. It’s
disgusting! Please do something about it and don’t buy into the greed of the land developers.
This road is a quick north valley traffic bypass that remains somewhat traffic free for now. There is great hiking
and desert views. For profit expansion in this area would destroy that.
We live in the area, have hiked these trails, our two boys attended nearby CCUSD Horseshoe Trails elementary
school, and I’d say that in general we have a strong desire to act as good stewards of this land and therefore
have a vested interest in maintaining the beauty of the Sonoran desert preserve and our balance with nature.
Its such a beautiful area it would just ruin the look.
Biological and cultural resources
Page 511
We moved further out of town to enjoy the natural desert beauty and to be away from traffic congestion,
expanding building does the opposite of that.
This is a wonderful area that provides so much to so many people in regards to beauty, quiet, exercise, nature. It
would be a shame to lose all this secondary to over development.
I want to preserve our current area and I bike 6 days a week in what I already consider dangerous traffic to get
to the preserve and ride the path!
The extra traffic flow will affect all the wild life amongst many other reasons.
We are homeowners in Tatum Highlands and use the beautiful Sonoran Desert Drive to get to one of our
favorite hiking areas, Apache Wash Trail. It is vitally important both ecologically and aesthetically to maintain
the Desert Overlay Plan to keep this remarkable Arizona treasure intact with low density, one story, blended
into the environment, natural colors, and with great respect of the surrounding preserve. The developer’s
existing project just to the west on Sonoran Desert Drive is an example of the opposite of this‐ homes close
together, no subtle and natural build character, no boundaries between homes, no blending with the Sonoran
Desert landscape. Sticks out while on the drive or hiking the Preserve rather than disappearing/tastefully
blending in. This is very concerning and must not be duplicated in any way. Please retain the existing Desert
Overlay Plan to maintain the incredible Sonoran Preserve. Thank you Councilman Waring and all city council
members. Respectfully submitted, Laurie Foster
Keeping some semblance of the desert lifestyle is why we moved here. Do not ignore the safeguards. Reduce
the number of housing units. Why do you want to do business with a company which clearly does not respect
nature, but only the economic bottom line ‐$
I travel Sonoran Desert Drive every day because I live right off of it. It is a beautiful drive, but also one that is
very serene and peaceful. I am concerned that allowing the Verdin community to be built at the requested
density it will cause a great impact and stress to the drive through the Preserve. Even if the road is expanded to
more lanes, this road will become a dangerous route for the bikers and hikers in the area, not to mention the
drivers. Please do not allow the density for this new community as requested!
Mark Dotterer
Keep population down to preserve the wildlife
Too much traffic already
My family lives in Sonoran Foothills. We chose this beautiful area because of the gorgeous desert preserve. We
love our out of the way pocket and want to protect the gorgeous pristine desert from further development.
Arizona is destroying so much of the natural land that people moved here for. I don’t want more traffic. It’s
awful as it is. Water is at emergency levels and more homes will only tax the water levels more.
Sonoran Desert drive is the only place I feel safe riding my bicycle in such a busy, congested area. I am full of
anxiety from traffic until I make that turn onto SDD. It is integral to our vibrant cycling community which is so
important to the Valley culture. What’s more is the preserve allows for one of the only true unobstructed views
of our beautiful AZ desert in the busy Valley area.
There is already too much traffic on Sonoran Desert Drive and a community as proposed with no other access
will increase congestion making things less safe. In addition, it will jeopardize the tranquility of the nearby
Phoenix Sonoran Preserve, especially the Apache Wash Trail.
It is a very peaceful place to hike. My family goes there frequently. The beauty of Sonoran Desert Dr is so
beautiful it should not be disturbed.
I run and cycle on the parkway and traffic is already dangerous, especially near the passing zones. I also hike
extensively and if many more houses are built, the views will become less spectacular than they are now. In
addition, wildlife would be affected by overdevelopment
Beautiful natural area that provides some of the best riding, running, hiking, and viewing in the greater Phoenix
area. It would be a tragedy to not preserve this wonderful natural area.
Page 512
Wide open space without traffic & housing congestion, w/o water & schooling requirements is vital to this area
of the Sonoran Preserve.
We are losing our open spaces at a rapid rate all in the name of money. We need to preserve these open spaces
for our future children to enjoy and for the natural animals and plants that were here before us. The increased
traffic and housing will deteriorate the quality of life for all (humans, animals and plants alike). The increased
concrete/pavement will ultimately increase the heat retention which has a detrimental effect on water, wildlife
and plant life. Do not ignore the Desert Character Overlay District.
This area is important to us as we hike and bike. Knowing that preserve will always be here made buying our
home easy. We would like for all development to mind and take care of our desert spaces. There is a reason
the Desert Character Overlay District was created. To ignore this would be a tragedy.
Too much growth and congestion. Lack of conservation to desert land and outdoor activities.
We moved up to this area to enjoy the beauty and tranquility of the area. Now it is being threatened. We
moved up to this area to see our beautiful dessert in its natural habit, and now it's being threatened. We moved
up here because it was a great dream come true, and now that dream is again being threatened by those
wishing to make many dollars off the land and environment that belongs to us all. Please, please let's stop this
travesty. Thanks for reading my input. We just so love it up here and hope for no more growth and
There are so many communities being built simply for the benefit and profit of the builders that little attention
is given to the people who actually want to have both, a beautiful home in a beautiful well thought out
community where the desert we live in is represented and not just the interest of the builders bottom line. Do
the right thing for a change.
I go hiking there to appreciate the natural beauty of the Sonoran desert and the breathtaking views of the
McDowell Mountains and Boulders of Carefree etc.One if the last pristine places to go up here in the N Valley .I
do not want more housing subdivisions and apartment buildings obstructing the views along with more traffic
congestion coming from the constant relentless overbuilding of housing presently occurring .Please save this
beautiful,natural corridor which is used for hiking and biking along with the equestrian trails for horseback
riding.Please allow local residents a sacred piece of land to cherish for us now as well as the generations to
come ,we need somewhere to go that we can take pride in .The Natural beauty of our desert lands is what drew
me to the area 42 years ago please Preserve it!!
It is a beautiful preserve that holds opportunity to connect with nature, and allow us all in the valley to have
natural habitat for wildlife and flora and fauna that are so important to keeping the integrity of our great state.
Sonoran Desert Drive is a crucial recreational corridor for cyclists and other vulnerable road users. It is an
increasingly rare thoroughfare that contains a bike lane, has little to moderate car traffic, has a low enough
speed limit which increase cyclists safety, and is uninterrupted by many traffic lights and stop signs. These
factors make it a beautiful place to recreate and provide a safe(r) place for cyclists to explore and enjoy the
beauty of the Sonoran Desert. The Sonoran Preserve provides similarly valuable recreation space for hikers,
mountain bikers, and other trail users. While further development of this area may provide financial benefits to
the city in the short term, the loss of natural land and recreational space will far out weigh these benefits over a
longer timeline. Further development will further increase the strain on water, further contribute to the urban
heat island effect, and decrease the happiness and mental benefits associated with outdoor activity and being in
natural landscapes. More low density, car oriented development is not the answer to the challenges that face
I hike and bike in the preserve and love listening and seeing all the blooms, wild animals and quietness the
desert has to offer. Please quit the over building that is going on! Preserve our water resources!!
We need to preserve the natural beauty of Arizona and stop over development.
With all the apartments being built on the west end between Dove Valley & Sonoran Desert Drive, the traffic
will become just like the city streets—noisy and congested. Verdin proposing additional homes will make it that
much worse. In addition, we moved to this area because of the Sonoron Desert Preserve which is becoming non
Page 513
the Desert Character Overlay District safeguards were put in place to keep this specific and unique area from
overdevelopment and should not be overturned due to developer greed.
Vital ecosystems are threatened by too much expansion and development.
I support maintaining the desert overlay requirements for the Sonoran preserve. We need to maintain a healthy
balance between nature and development and not allow these safeguards to be discarded for development of
any current or future projects.
The natural beauty and desert landscape is home to so much wildlife and is also enjoyed year round by current
adventure and outdoor advocates
The preserve needs to be left in tact. The uptick in traffic will be detrimental to people trying to enjoy
biking/walking & enjoying nature. The shear numbers in volume in people in driving on Sonoran Parkway if this
plan is approved is very alarming.
I live here and traffic is already getting too much! We moved here 10 years ago to be out in the desert!!! I hike
on the trails at least twice a week! Please keep more desert!
Too much traffic. Dangerous to have additional traffic where lots of bikers use the bike path. Why not build on
the other side of 17 instead of near the preserve. Help of wildlife not be pushed out even more.
Our desert is part of our lifestyle's. Many of us hike and enjoy our desert landscape. The area is not built for
even 400+ homes, with an average of 2 vehicles per home. Our local school system doesn’t support the vast
amount of new developments going up currently. It’s will also decrease night visibility of the sky in the evening
for those who use telescopes. It will also increase area emissions, pollution visibility, and area temperature.
The Sonoran preserve is just that, a Preserve. It preserves many species of plants and wildlife that is indigenous
to the area. It is vitally important that we preserve this area for our children and their children.
Living in the area I regularly hike and bike in the preserve with my family and do not want to see it get overrun
with more housing developments. Additionally Dove Valley is already very congested, I want to preserve our
desert, Phoenix in general has a water issue, and most importantly the schools in this area are already over
Abundance of traffic and congestion
Please preserve the beautiful desert.
It is imperative we save our Sonoran Desert. There is not a viable reason a developer should be able to double
or triple the amount of homes and City Council should not allow it. The developer does not care about quality of
life or preserving our precious desert, they only care about how much profit they can make. This is a time for
our City Council to stand up for the best interest of the residents of Phoenix and not give in to the desire of a
developer. The proposed development goes against the preservation of our desert, increase traffic, take away
hiking, biking trails and general quality of life for the residents.
With all the planned development in the area, I have a major concern about the infrastructure, and even
planned expansion, being able to support the additional housing in the preserve. Part of the appeal of our area
is the desert beauty, so additionally, overturning district safeguards not only damages the natural environment,
but risks all those that already live/work in this community.
Please do not increase the level of traffic on sonoran desert parkway. The additional cars will increase risk to
current commuters and cyclists.
To preserve the desert for all to enjoy hiking, biking, and the beauty.
Preservation of our land is critical. While I accept development that has been approved, businesses need to
consider the impact to the surrounding area and growth for the sake of growth is not an acceptable plan.
Concerned about traffic, School crowding, and preserving the desert. They need to keep the desert safe guards
in place.
Page 514
The Sonoran desert preserve is the one of last the undeveloped areas in Phoenix. The abundant wildlife and
topography is one of the many reasons we love Arizona and want to save flit for generations to come. We
access the preserve nearly daily for hiking and for enjoying the outdoors. We urge you to to preserve this
natural area and reject the request to remove the desert overlay in the upcoming Verdin project.
The desert is slowly vanishing which breaks my heart. The Sonoran Preserve should be as it is titled “PRESERVE
Preserving our land for wildlife, beautification and the earth needs to be heard! Enough has been taken over by
businesses and HOA builders. This needs to stop!
Too many houses are taking the little land left we have to see and enjoy the animals and desert habitat life. We
need our nature, we need our desert life. Protect it!
We have overpopulated the North Phoenix area already with many dense residencies, namely apartment
complexes and townhomes. I believe we need to slow down and consider expansion in a different direction so
that we don't lose many of our beautiful mountain and nature parcels that we need to save. I feel this is being
rushed and has not been thoroughly reviewed and vetted.
We moved here from Wisconsin almost 4 years ago. 100% the reason we selected to live up here in the North
valley was because of the Sonoran preserve. We chose to not be inside the 101 on purpose.please don't allow
the Sonoran desert drive and beautiful desert around it to be taken over with cars and traffic.
Sonoran Desert Drive is one of the few places in The Valley that is great for cycling. The grid nature of the PHX
metro area has largely left road cycling and bike lanes as an afterthought, but SDD seems to be an oasis‐like
exception‐ truly a world class stretch of road that has already begun to change due to the development on the
west side. It would be tragic if this preserve was to fill in any more than it already is‐ preserve some of what
We have a young family and love to hike which is why we moved to this area. If we don’t stop this, it will
destroy the area and wildlife.
Too many people and too much traffic is bad for the environment and the people living in the area, like me.
Traffic will likely significantly increase staying within the growth guidelines, so ignoring the guidelines and
increasing the number of dwellings in the area beyond the guidelines will make traffic and life even worse.
I don’t want to see that beautiful desert area ruined with homes intruding. It was already upsetting to see that
area being ruined by the developers greed for money. I say “NO” to the developers!!
I believe honoring the meaning of the preserve is of utmost importance.
I feel that they are over building in Phoenix. Have limited water supply. The traffic is already congested and
difficult to around.
There would be too much traffic and it will ruin the beauty of this area of the desert. There are enough
developments in the area and we need to keep these areas open.
It’s the only road up north not yet ruined by the constant construction (traffic, houses, etc) happening up North
and still the only place where active people (cyclists, runners, etc) can ride/run safely and enjoy a piece of the
desert without housing and buildings ruined the view
Amount of traffic it will bring on a street that is only 2 lanes. Also the reason the street is unique designed for
the preservation of the beauty and for enjoyment for cyclists hikers and walking paths
My family hikes and mountain bikes several times per week on these trails. We truly appreciate this land and
would not want its inhabitants to be disrupted any further than they already are.
The Sonoran Preserve is a promise to keep our beautiful desert pristine. Encroachment of more homes breaks
that promise. The delicate balance of between humans and wildlife is already teetering in the wrong direction.
Let’s save some beauty for future generations.
I am so tired of seeing buildings upon buildings being built in areas that are natural to Arizona. Let’s just stop
this now. It’s getting out of control and species natural habitat needs to stay in place.
I have lived here for 10 years and watched the beauty of the desert being destroyed with development. The
plants, animals and the majestic beauty of the desert is ruined by the continued development until there is no
desert left. It is very sad.
Page 515
Need Preserve, otherwise we will lose out on the beautiful scenery and have way to much congestion.
Please help us preserve this beautiful natural resource. So often “progress” (AKA Greed) ends up destroying one
precious landscape after another… We greatly value our current way of life. Some of us have made a great many
sacrifices in order to live here. Speaking as a disabled Veteran, I specifically sought out my current home, which
at the moment affords peace, beauty, and a decided lack of city noise. Don’t let a massive influx of absent‐
minded tourists and irresponsible over‐development destroy this paradise. Thank you ‐ Dr. Eric Biscoglio
I chose to live in this community because I wanted to be closer to nature and enjoy the desert preserve.
We do not want the sonoran preserve to be destroyed just to build some additional homes. The traffic is already
a major problem and there is not enough infrastructure and businesses around here to support all these homes.
It's a Beautiful area for our community. Hiding companies should stay within how the area is zoned
We need to protect these lands and stop paving over the natural beauty of this Preserve. There is a reason it is
called a Preserve. Let’s preserve it and the abundant plants and wildlife that call it home!
It’s critically important to protect the preserve and maintain the natural beauty of the area. This is why so many
of us moved here. It’s already not safe to leave the neighborhood with people speeding and limited visibility of
the rolling road. Added traffic would make routine activities no longer enjoyable.
The valley is continually growing and cycling collisions, injuries, and fatalities seem to be increasing, or at least
they are ongoing. I, and many others in the cycling community, feel more at danger than ever before. There are
few places we can go and enjoy long, uninterrupted stretches of road, and still feel relatively safe. Sonoran
Parkway is a frequent choice for us and we enjoy it year‐round. Please preserve this area from development.
We chose this part of Phoenix when we moved from out of state because of the open desert and what that
offered, little traffic, and less people in general. In just 4 short years we are seeing things change for the
negative…reminding us of overdevelopment we experienced in the East San Francisco Bay Area.
Overdevelopment that led to traffic issues and overcrowded schools, just to name a couple problems. We don’t
want to see these same mistakes take place in our new home. And we don’t want to lose the beautiful open
I have lung issues from cycling alongside traffic for so many years and I was struck by a car ladt year while riding!
Having a gem like this is so important! People can enjoy the desert without the noise, pollution, and safety
issues that come with increased traffic. Please, let's keep a little bit of Arizona wild + scenic.
We live along the Sonoran Preserve. We bought here because it was a quiet peaceful area to raise kids and
explore nature. Please don’t allow more homes to destroy this area of nature. It will ruin the bike trail and
hiking trails and cause a lot more traffic in the area.
Ruin of preserve / increased traffic volume
I moved to this area because I love the open spaces.
I walk the desert everyday it is vital to keep it preserved . Arizona is in danger , water shortage , wildlife please
keep preserve
We love to hike this beautiful area. Also the drive down Sonoran parkway is incredible. We must preserve this
desert not only for human enjoyment but also the wildlife that call it home
The Sonoran Preserve needs to be saved, it provides recreation like walking, hiking and biking. Also, it keeps the
heat down. Adding more homes will only create more traffic. One of the reasons we moved to this area is due
to this Sonoran Preserve.
I want to protect the wilderness and essence of the preserve. I thought this land was protected from future
housing development
This would cause pollution dust noise and would be harmful to our health
Climate change
We hike and drive through here for mental health. Please don’t fill more desert preserves with homes and
commercial property.
I’m concerned that continued development will destroy the beauty of our Sonoran desert. It will bring increased
pollution and traffic to the area.
Page 516
I love exploring and hiking this area with my family.
I am a city of Phoenix park steward for the far north valley preserves including Apache Wash and Dixie
Mountain. I patrol these trails for hiker safety several times of month. The beauty and open desert landscape of
the Sonoran area is a prime reason why people move to this area or visit it to hike or bike. Please do not add
higher density housing and destroy the open land we currently enjoy.
It’s nature. Beautiful parts of the valley have already been ruined by housing projects. This shouldn’t be another
This has been a place for bikers, hikers, walkers, to enjoy and be able to still see arizonas beauty. We do not
need more development in every area. This road every weekend houses hundreds of athletes, outdoors people,
and scenic drivers all alike. Coming up to this stretch of road to enjoy what they love to do be outside away from
the city noise and traffic and be one with the Arizona desert. There is plenty of other great land to develop on
but this road has history and will continue to be a place people want to feel safe and connect to nature on.
Please don’t take that from Arizonans.
Page 517
Racelle Escolar
From: Henschel Rich
Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 5:15 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com
Subject: Comments for May 5th Planning Meeting Agenda items 5 and 8
Hello. My name is Rich Henschel and I live in the Sonoran Gate subdivision off of 7th Street and Dove Valley Road. My
concerns regarding the Taylor Morrison Verdin proposal are primarily centered around the roadway infrastructure that is
currently in place and what is planned in the immediate future.
As you know there is only a single lane of traffic in each direction for a significant portion of the roadway between North
Paloma Parkway and Cave Creek Road. You may not be aware of this, but just a couple years ago before Covid, the
morning rush hour east-bound traffic would back up at least a mile at the intersection of Cave Creek Road and Sonoran
Desert Drive with people needing to go either north or south on Cave Creek Road. Since many people have changed
their work habits during Covid, this hasn't been a big problem the last year or two. However, more and more people are
going back into work and there is already a new subdivision being built out by Pulte and Lennar homes at Dove Valley
Road and North Paloma Parkway. This will certainly add additional eastbound traffic. Now with this Verdin proposal the
traffic will increase significantly with 1200 - 1400 new homes.
The second concern I have relates to the fact there there is only one roadway which services my subdivision as well as
the new proposed Verdin subdivision. You may not be aware of this but a few years ago there was a fire in the Sonoran
desert and Sonoran Desert Drive was closed just west of Cave Creek Road for 2 - 3 weeks. The only way to get to my
home from Cave Creek Road was to drive north to Carefree highway, west until 27th Avenue, south until Dove Valley
Road and then come in from the west. This was a significant detour and added at least 15 minutes to my travel
time. What if this happened again? How would this affect Police and Fire response times? What if a house was on fire
or someone was having a heart attack? That additional 15 minutes could be the difference between life and death.
I realize there is a proposal to expand the roadway with 2 lanes of traffic in each direction with a median in the
middle. However, I have no confirmation from the City of Phoenix on when that will actually become a reality. I've simply
heard that traffic patterns will be reviewed and actions will be taken at the appropriate time. Unfortunately that doesn't
give me a lot of confidence. Frankly I think we already have an exposure and to begin building such a huge subdivision
before addressing this exposure is irresponsible.
Please understand that I am not against land development in general. My father was a land developer and I understand
the importance of offering various housing alternatives, especially in this current housing shortage. But I urge the city
planners to reject this development proposal until these roadway infrastructure exposures can be closely studied and
properly addressed.
Thank you.
Rich
Page1 518
Racelle Escolar
From: C Severance
Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 10:20 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Desert overlay and Taylor Morris
Good evening.
I am writing to you as a concerned citizen of the Sonoran Foothills neighborhood. I am 100% opposed to the shrinking of
the desert overlay for the convenience of home builders like Taylor Morris. The builders' primary concern is for
increased revenue, which comes at the expense of our beautiful desert and the animals that call it home. Please protect
our wildlife. Please protect our beautiful landscape. Please protect our preserve.
Thank you.
Christine Severance
Page1 519
Racelle Escolar
From: Mead Summer, REALTOR, CRS
Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2022 11:08 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Case #Z-6-22-2 and GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
Attachments: planning commission.docx
Dear Racelle and Planning Commission members:
Attached is my letter in opposition to Case #Z‐6‐22‐2 and GPA‐DSTV‐22‐2 in their current form. To be clear, I
am not against construction of new homes entirely. However, the presentation made on behalf of DR Horton
failed to disclose numerous issues, and the chairman of the Desert View Village Planning Commission showed
obvious bias toward the builder and against concerned citizens.
Please share this letter with the members of the Planning Commission, I am willing to make time to meet with
any Planning Commission members in person or by phone or computer if they would like to discuss the merits
and concerns about this project.
Sincerely,
Mead Summer, REALTOR, CRS, AHWD
Vice President, Pinnacle at Desert Peak Homeowners Association
Associate Broker, West USA Realty
Certified Residential Specialist (CRS)
Maricopa County Real Estate Special Commissioner
Member, Arizona REALTORS Professional Standards Committee
Licensed Real Estate Continuing Education (CE) instructor
Phone: 480/747‐7255
Email: mead@superiorAZhomes.com
Web: www.superiorAZhomes.com [superiorazhomes.com]
Page1 520
pdd.planningcomm@phoenix.gov
Dear Commission Members:
In light of the misinformation provided by DR Horton representatives and the clear bias shown by the
chairman of the Desert View Village Planning Committee (DVVPC), I wish to bring to light numerous
issues regarding DR Horton’s rezoning application for an area of over 400 acres west of Cave Creek Road
and south of Jomax Road (case #GPA‐DSTV‐1‐22‐2 and companion case Z‐6‐22‐2).
As a resident of Desert View since 2007, a sitting HOA board member and a Realtor who does
substantial business within the Desert View area, I fully understand the need for more housing.
However, DR Horton presented numerous fallacies in its presentation. Some seemingly received only lip
service from the planning committee, others were ignored altogether. Even when residents raised the
issues, the chairman of the committee disputed residents’ claims and, in one case, ridiculed an older
resident because the resident inadvertently referred to Pinnacle High School as “Pinnacle Peak High
School.”
The Stone Butte East development proposed by DR Horton is slated to consist of 1,145 single‐family
homes, a 260‐unit apartment community consisting of two‐ and three‐story buildings, and a 140‐unit
community of single‐family casitas that are planned as rental units. The issues that I take with the
proposed plans primarily concern the traffic that the proposed 1,500+ homes would bring, as well as the
height of the apartment community.
The traffic issue that must be considered related to the level of traffic on Cave Creek Road. Cave Creek
Road has five lanes between the 101 and Jomax Road ‐‐ two northbound lanes and three southbound
lanes. During the DR Horton presentation, the DR Horton representative claimed that the builder’s
traffic study showed that “75 percent of the traffic produced by this community will be going south.”
This comment went unexplained by DR Horton and unquestioned by DVVPC members, but concerned
residents picked up what board members apparently missed.
To be more specific than the DR Horton representative, the traffic study showed, likely accurately, that
most of the people who would live in this community would be more likely to travel south toward the
101 rather than north toward Cave Creek proper. What seems obvious, but what no committee
member ever noted, was that all the people who would go south in the morning on the way to work
would later travel north from the 101 to the new community on their way home. The two northbound
lanes of Cave Creek Road north of the 101 already are overburdened; northbound traffic waiting for the
traffic light at Deer Valley Road already extends halfway to Rose Garden Lane during rush hour. The
addition of 1500 new homes without widening northbound Cave Creek Road to three lanes would turn
this area into a daily crucible for northbound drivers, and DR Horton made clear that widening
northbound Cave creek Road would not be the responsibility of the builder.
Page 521
My other concern is the height of the apartments. In 2017/2018, DR Horton approached the City about
building a three‐story apartment community at the intersection of Cave Creek and Pinnacle Peak roads.
At the time, I and other concerned residents pointed out, first to the DVVPC and then to the Phoenix
Planning Commission, that all residential communities along and near the Cave Creek Road corridor
north of the 101 were no more than two stories. We argued that a three‐story community would
change the character of the surrounding community – which (somewhat ironically) also was built by DR
Horton. Although the DVPCC ignored residents’ concerns, the Planning Commission voted to limit the
apartment community to two stories and the City Council followed the advice of Planning Commission.
Now, DR Horton again seeks to build a three‐story community that would affect the character of
communities that were built by, yes, DR Horton. Those include Desert Peak and The Pinnacle at Desert
Peak, whose residents fought against three‐story buildings in 2017/2018, as well as the new Stone Butte
community, which DR Horton built over the past two years.
On behalf of my neighbors and fellow DR Horton home owners, I ask that you strongly consider the issue
of northbound traffic from the 101 to the subject area when deciding whether to approve the planned
rezoning and a construction project of such magnitude. I also ask that, at the very least, you restrict the
apartment community to no more than two levels, following the reasoning of the Planning Commission
and the City Council in 2017/2018.
Please know that I am available to discuss this issue with you in person, by phone, or by computer.
Sincerely,
Mead Summer
Vice President, Pinnacle at Desert Peak HOA
Associate Broker, West USA Realty
480/747‐7255
mead@superiorazhomes.com
Page 522
Racelle Escolar
From: Diana Duran
Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2022 2:12 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com
Subject: Sonoran Preserve
Hello,
I am against changing the Desert Character Overlay on Sonoran Desert Drive. The Sonoran Preserve is very unique and
changing the Desert Character Overlay would damage the flora and fauna that live in the Wash.
I also drive on Sonoran Desert Drive and it is only a two lane road and to add 1,250 homes would add an additional
2,500 cars on that road. There are several subdivisions that would be impacted by the addition of all the cars because
Dove Valley Rd/Sonoran Desert Drive is the only exit and entrance for some of those subdivisions. Also there is a
crosswalk Dove Valley Road that sometimes gets difficult to cross as it is today and to add an additional 2,500 cars will
make it dangerous for walkers and bikers using that crosswalk.
Traffic gets backed up going East on Sonoran Desert Drive and when turning onto Cave Creek Rd one can wait at least 5
minutes to turn in the morning. I’ve seen it backed up by at least 25 cars.
I’m not against the building the homes but let’s make sure that we don’t impact the Sonoran Preserve in an unhealthy
way and allow people to access Apache Wash trailhead safely. The infrastructure is not there to house 1,295 homes and
to allow homes to be built without the proper infrastructure would make it a big headache to old and new homeowners.
Kind Regards,
Diana
Page1 523
ATTACHMENT J
From: Christine M Pedersen
To: Julianna Pierre; Joshua Bednarek
Subject: FW: Verdin - Save Our Sonoran Preserve
Date: Thursday, May 19, 2022 1:52:08 PM
From: Sonoran Preserve
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2022 11:30:44 AM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Verdin - Save Our Sonoran Preserve
Dear Councilman Waring,
Recently, I wrote to you about a mailing that Save Our Sonoran Preserve was doing to gage public
support for retaining the Desert Character Overlay District. The mailing was made to a total
sampling of 3400 of the nearly 12,000 registered voters living near the Preserve in District 2. The
area is highlighted green in the map posted
at: https://app.box.com/s/bnui5b5w5ufyqidem2mmwfg0jofh1c6f [app.box.com].
An aerial showing where our 1100 petition signers are located can be viewed
at: https://i0.wp.com/ceds.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Save-Our-Sonoran-Petition-Signer-
Locations-5-11-2022.jpg?ssl=1 [i0.wp.com]
A 35-page compilation of the reasons provided by 98% of the petition signers is
at: https://ceds.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Reasons-Why-Voters-Want-To-Preserve-the-
Desert-Character-Overlay-District-4-29-2022.pdf [ceds.org]
I am pleased to report to you that the mailing is showing a high degree of deeply felt support for
the Sonoran Preserve among nearby voters, all of which are urging you to maintain the overlay
ordinance.
We would love the opportunity to meet with you again at City Hall to discuss these results and
hopefully work on a solution that your constitutes would find agreeable.
Please reach out to me on how we can schedule a meeting before the June 1st City Council
meeting.
In the meantime, I have listed some helpful links on the survey results below.
Looking forward to speaking with you again soon and thank you for your invested interest in this
development!
-Dr. Gary Kirkilas
Save Our Sonoran Preserve
708-369-4566
Page 524
Links:
- We mailed the letter at the following link to 3400 registered voters, half of which were
Republican and half Democrat: https://app.box.com/s/3wp1f022c56vu1j566ph0kdcmcbztdh8
[app.box.com].
- The mailing to 3400 voters has thus far generated 1100 signatures of the petition
at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/sonorapreserve [surveymonkey.com].
- A map showing the location where supporters live is
at: https://app.box.com/s/t0am8a0717ksk0o1sdalrgdc19zhlcdk [app.box.com]. As you’ll see
support is coming from voters living up to four miles from the Sonoran Preserve. And support is
about equal from Republicans and Democrats.
- Nearly all of the petition signers provided the reasons for why they want the Sonoran Preserve
safeguards of the Desert Character Overlay District retained. These reasons can be viewed
at: https://app.box.com/s/405n9bnddchkl92qj29j1x1m0yx8xhun [app.box.com].
*******
Page 525
Page 526
Page 527
Reasons Provided By Phoenix Residents for Why They Signed
the Save Our Sonoran Preserve Petition at:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/sonorapreserve
We need to do everything we can to protect the Sonoran Desert Preserve. There shouldn’t be lots of homes
there. We’ve already taken so much of the natural habitat and developed it. We need to leave large chunks
alone so that those animals that live in the desert have a place. I love having the wilderness nearby and
untouched. Increasing the number of homes near the preserve is asking for trouble and displacing so many of
the desert animals. I bought out here to be close to nature not to bring the downtown traffic here.
I walk and bike at the preserve at least a couple of times a week. It’s beautiful, and quiet. Driving through to
cave creek rd is actually relaxing, I drive that way when I want to stay away from the crowds on the freeways
(17 & 101). It’s a beautiful drive, it’s what living in Az is about, wide open and beautiful to look at. Don’t ruin it
with more houses and traffic congestion.
As a native Arizonan I am saddened to see so much of the natural beauty of our desert being scourged. Driving
anywhere in the valley and nearby areas you are assaulted by the lack of natural beauty. We need to halt urban
scrawl and save the desert for our grandchildren.
I chose to live in this community because I wanted to be closer to nature and enjoy the desert preserve.
The amount of traffic we already have on dove valley is excessive. We do not need to add more.
I use the Sonoran preserve almost daily to get a brief reprieve from the overcrowding of Phoenix. The ability to
briefly enjoy the desert views without seeing endless developments and choking smog of cars is why we decided
to live in this area.
Too much traffic and too many users making heavy environmental impact. The preserve is there for a reason.
any change to Desert Character Overlay will open the door to the entire area being filled in with high density
housing. Forever destroying the natural landscape of the area. Please vote NO.
Safeguarding the Sonoran Desert Preserve values we treasure
The reason we moved here was the beauty and tranquility of the desert. We were not aware of the proposed
‘city like’ community Verdin wishes to build.
Beautiful desert! Everything doesn’t need to be destroyed and built up
The Arizona desert is a truly beauty that nothing else compares to. Large Cati with blooming flowers, mountain
ranges from every aspect, and wildlife that is crucial for our ecosystem; there’s are just a few reasons that make
Arizona great. WE ARE KILLING OUR SONORAN PRESERVE WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION AND HOME
DEVELOPMENTS. We do not want more homes, we want to save our preserve!!!! I want my everyone to be able
to drive down Sonoran desert dr and experience the breathtaking views that I get to see everyday I drive to and
from work. This is truly a special place and we need to keep it that way. Taylor Morrison can go find another
place to destroy if they want to make a quick buck. But I don’t want to see it here
The Sonoran Preserve and the Sonoran Desert Drive represent the last of pristine desert in the city of Phoenix.
Anyone who has visited the Preserve and the Drive will see beautiful views, wildlife, and people using the bike
lanes and hiking trails. To allow a massive development destroy the character overlay will ruin the peaceful
drive and endanger the ecosystem. I also fear that the additional traffic will no doubt create dangerous
conditions for cyclists that regularly train on Sonoran Desert Drive. We live here to appreciate the desert. But
the desert is disappearing in Phoenix. The Sonoran Preserve is a wonderful area of Phoenix and a great place to
escape to from the hustle and bustle of other areas. To grant the rezoning request of a home builder will send
the message that the City of Phoenix cares more about development and not about the constituents who
Need to preserve the Sonoran desert. Too many greedy developers that don’t care since they probably don’t
live here.
Page 528
The Sonoran preserve is a natural heritage that should not be jeopardized in our beautiful state. Preserving our
natural resources is vital in maintaining our environment as well as maintaining tourism . It is a shame that our
government is allowing this to Happen.
There is already so much danger to bicyclists. Also, just as important, keeping the desert beautiful and allowing
wildlife to thrive in the Sonoran Preserve.
The number of people hiking is increasing but even if is not, the streets are narrow and it is dangerous to drive.
Keep the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve desert beautiful with no construction expansion‐ there’s plenty of
other areas to build houses, etc.
I want to preserve the desert. We have a water shortage not enough water now for the people that live here.
Not enough schools why aren’t the building responsible for building schools for the children?
The unique space is one of the main reasons we built our home in the Gateway region. It has only been open
for a few years and needs to remain a "Preserve" and not stress or encroach on the desert any more than
already has happened.
We have overpopulated the North Phoenix area already with many dense residencies, namely apartment
complexes and townhomes. I believe we need to slow down and consider expansion in a different direction so
that we don't lose many of our beautiful mountain and nature parcels that we need to save. I feel this is being
rushed and has not been thoroughly reviewed and vetted.
This is so important to protect the natural beauty, wildlife, ecosystems, and quiet quality of life that draws
people to the area and the state in general. Please act to prevent the potentially irreparable damage discarding
these safeguards could cause!
Beautiful desert and shouldn’t be changed for housing
Environmental protection of natural areas/habitats, reduce water demand, reduce pollution and traffic
congestion in this area.
We enjoy hiking, biking, and taking beautiful nature photos! Please don’t pollute our beautiful desert with more
needless building!
Enjoying the desert environment is something we need to protect so that we can continue to share it with
Keep some of Phoenix beautiful and preserving the desert beauty. The Phoenix police department can not
handle the calls for service right now how will they handle more traffic.
Traffic and it will ruin the beauty of the area. This is corporate greed
Preserving the preserve ‐ wildlife Traffic and then needed retail to support the development Overdevelopment
of this area
The desert beauty of this area is its most treasured asset
The Desert Character Overlay District was put in place to allow for growth but with measures and safeguards
needed. Ignoring and allowing growth beyond that allowed by the Desert Overlay District in the Sonoran
Preserve area is wrong and will lesson the uniqueness and beauty that we currently have, while also adding
traffic and reducing safety for those that currently enjoy cycling, walking, hiking, etc. along Sonoran and the
preserves. Please do not allow Verdin development to move forward with their plans to exponentially grow this
area and add more homes To the Sonoran Preserve. Thank you.
Please follow the Desert Character Overlay District plan. Keep traffic low and undeveloped land so we can enjoy
the preserve.
Preserving our land for wildlife, beautification and the earth needs to be heard! Enough has been taken over by
businesses and HOA builders. This needs to stop!
The beauty of the desert is disappearing fast! We drive Sonoran desert drive 2‐3 times a week west bound
around sunset. So many people simple stop to take pictures because of the beauty. There is a brief opportunity
to do this because soon houses come into view and obstruct the natural vistas. Home being built today are huge
two story monstrosities, craning this large home together will destroy this beautiful landscape.
Page 529
I moved here in 2007 to be near this great preserve and to live I. A quiet community. Adding this much housing
developments will forever impact this natural environment
My wife Barbara and I have lived in Sonoran Foothills for nearly nine years. The appeal of this location was and
still is the Sonoran Preserve, a true gift to the residents of Phoenix. Many years ago the overlay district
created a plan for growth balanced with the fragile ecosystem of the preserve. Neglecting this balance
jeopardizes the character which makes this place so special as well as places the preserve at risk. I respectfully
request the Phoenix City Council comply with the overlay and hold Verdin to the established guidelines. After all,
one of the reasons this area appeals to them is they recognize the beauty and appeal of this location to future
as a third generation native zoney, I have seen too much of our beautiful desert turned over to developers. We
must preserve the very asset that draws so many to move to our wonderful state‐ find a better balance
between growth and preservation. I recently moved to a home in Sonoran Foothills to enjoy this beautiful area.
Please do not allow the greed of developers overbuild our desert.
I mountain bike this area at least twice a week and do not want to see the area changed. It is already crowded
on the weekends
When we moved to Arizona nearly 7 years ago, we chose the Sonoran Foothills neighborhood because of the
surroundings. We did not want to live in an overdeveloped area in more developed parts of the valley. We enjoy
our trails and open desert and do not want them further disrupted by overriding existing protections.
Natalie Karis
The Phoenix Sonoran Preserve is one of the finest uses of tax payer dollars. The ability to hike and mountain
bike on miles and miles of trails is one of my favorite parts of living in North Phoenix. We are already inundated
with apartment complexes and home developments with plenty of inventory. Plus, there is plenty of land
available for developers to build on that won’t wreck one of the best things that the City of Phoenix has done in
the past couple decades.
Too much housing buildout, need to slow down a little
It is a very peaceful place to hike. My family goes there frequently. The beauty of Sonoran Desert Dr is so
beautiful it should not be disturbed.
I live in the Sonoran desert preserve. Since 2007
Climate change
This area is important to preserve. I regularly use this area for recreation and it is an important reason why I
choose to live in the north valley as opposed to other areas in Phoenix. I DO NOT WANT THE NORTH VALLEY TO
TURN INTO CHANDLER OR GILBERT!!!!
It’s vital to keep the preserve natural and untouched for the use of hiking and supporting outdoor activities.
Without the regulations in place there would be no preserve to use and admire. The animals in the preserve
would be greatly affected by a larger population crowding them.
The amount of traffic increase will greatly harm the ecosystem as well as increased foot traffic in this unique
I've hiked the Apache Trail and adjacent areas through the years while visiting my family in Phoenix. I recently
bought a house in the area and I'm saddened and alarmed that the Phoenix City Council would entertain the
doubling or tripling the number of housing units on the Verdin site. There is a reason why the Desert Character
Overlay District is in existence. I strongly urge the Council to reject the Verdin development company's proposal
to double or triple the number of housing units for the Verdin site.
Destroying desert habitat, overpopulating an area not intended to. Negative effects on property value.
Our desert is beautiful. There won’t be much of it left if it keeps getting built on.
Too many housing developments going up, water, waste and increased traffic issues.
To preserve the beauty and nature of the Sonoran Desert
Page 530
We are losing our open spaces at a rapid rate all in the name of money. We need to preserve these open spaces
for our future children to enjoy and for the natural animals and plants that were here before us. The increased
traffic and housing will deteriorate the quality of life for all (humans, animals and plants alike). The increased
concrete/pavement will ultimately increase the heat retention which has a detrimental effect on water, wildlife
and plant life. Do not ignore the Desert Character Overlay District.
I drive this road regularly and it’s already getting over populated with traffic with the current development.
More housing and construction will take away the natural beauty of the Sonoran desert preserve and will also
increase unwanted traffic.
This would forever destroy the natural landscape and open the door to even more urban sprawl. Please vote NO
No wanting any more home delvelopers tearing up the preserves. With the additional Verizon zone site there
will be to many dangerous EMF’s in the community
There are plenty of other places to build, these this beautiful piece of land beautiful. Keep the traffic down for
those of us who use this area for biking. Oh yes, and where are you getting all the water to support all of this
new construction?!?
I’m concerned that continued development will destroy the beauty of our Sonoran desert. It will bring increased
pollution and traffic to the area.
The reason why I'm signing this petition. We are over developing because we have all these people moving from
other states . We are destroying our beautiful desert to please all these greedy business people to put more
money in their pockets.
I enjoy hiking at various times of the year on the trails in the Sonoran Preserve. I’ve seen an owls nest, lots of
birds, turtles, and cactus of all kinds in all stages of bloom. There is presently no noise pollution and the area is
pristine. I want it to remain as such for future generations to come, not just in my lifetime.
We don't have the infrastructure to support any additional growth. I wish we could halt the issuance of any
further building permits in the state until we can guarantee the people of AZ that we will have adequate water
and energy resources to match projected growth rates. We can NOT have growth outpace supply.
I live directly adjacent to the open desert by the Sonoran Desert Preserve, just off Sonoran Desert Parkway. We
regularly see wildlife, and hear coyotes on a nightly basis. This is a fragile and important ecosystem, and is a
hallmark of the beauty of Arizona’s natural desert landscape. If it disappears, it will destroy this magnificent
aspect of what makes Arizona such a great place to live. For my family, the day the bulldozers show up to tear
down the majestic Saguaro’s to make room for concrete & asphalt, is the day we sell and move away.
I believe honoring the meaning of the preserve is of utmost importance.
1‐ more traffic 2‐displacing wildlife and plants.
Traffic is already overloaded on dove valley road and commitments were made to develop the Sonoran desert
drive. Nothing has happen. Trying to exit my desert enclave neighbor is struggle now, adding more traffic is
negligent. I also moved to the area for the serenity of the preserves and natural habits, all developers in the
area must comply with the desert character overlay.
This area is greatly used for hiking, biking, trail running, and outdoor recreational activities. We do not want
over development to ruin the natural aesthetics, significantly increase noise, or pollution that would degrade
the value of the true remaining wilderness in the Sonoran Desert Preserve. Please seek to enforce and uphold
the Desert Character Overlay District toward the Verdin project and other subsequent proposals.
Our schools are already over capacity and adding yet another high density housing development will adversely
impact the school infrastructure as well as the safety to bikers in Sonoran Boulevard/Dove Valley. Allowing
larger lots and this home sizes will attract more affluent residents and this increase the tax revenues for this
I oppose the Verdin site changing the current Desert Character Overlay District plan. We are already seeing
traffic that is dangerous to our cyclists and pedestrians. Adding additional homes without concern for the traffic
it will bring will greatly make this road even more dangerous.
Page 531
Preserving the natural beauty of the area is important to current residents. They use this area for healthy
recreation. It also should be saved fir environmental reasons. Don’t add to the sprawl that is already part of
may areas in Phoenix .
We live in a largely unspoiled Area of the city. We chose this location for its natural beauty and remoteness
from the busy‐ness of the city. We enjoy the outdoor activities it has to offer without the noise and pollution we
see elsewhere. Please help preserve this area for future generations to enjoy.
Currently traffic on Dove Valley / Sonoran Desert Drive is heavy during busy hours. With the addition of Verdin
adding 1200 homes could increase traffic by 3 times and with 2 new housing developments currently being built
west of us and the new semiconductor plant being built could increase traffic by 6 times as where it is today.
Plus taking over more of the desert landscape that was originally approved is just being greedy. I am all for
progress and increasing tax base but there must be limits to preserve the beauty of our area.
With all the planned development in the area, I have a major concern about the infrastructure, and even
planned expansion, being able to support the additional housing in the preserve. Part of the appeal of our area
is the desert beauty, so additionally, overturning district safeguards not only damages the natural environment,
but risks all those that already live/work in this community.
The preserve is a sanctuary and feel that this increased volume of homes would create a dangerous high traffic
in an area that is a recreational haven for cyclist, hikers and runners. The impact of these homes will also have a
negative affect on the the wildlife and natural dessert of the area.
My family and I use these trials for recreation purposes. We are also concerned as a community for the traffic as
well as how it will effect the wildlife.
As the builders destroy the land for more houses the animal life get pushed away and in to smaller areas of
open land. Or get caught in or on people's property. Unacceptable to just ignore the standards for there
It’s a gorgeous area that exemplifies the desert…and it’s close to the valley. Developing this area is a sad
mistake that we should learn that open spaces need preserved
Maintain desert preserve, congestion, quality of life, safer place to enjoy desert with exercise.
With the amount of traffic on Sonoran/Dove Valley today, when we pull out of Sonoran Gate Community, it is
taking a chance on your life when needing to turn left. Why would anyone approve more home building to get
more traffic? Also cars ‐ and trucks ‐ are speeding between 55‐70 miles an hour on this stretch. You should
have traffic lights at all intersections for turning traffic. Also, Let's Save Our Desert Views ‐ that's why we built a
We are overbuilding this area. Traffic, water supply, pollution are all contributing factors to limit growth. In
addition, the limited wildlife will be severely impacted
Sonoran desert is such a beautiful drive. Everyone should be able to experience it. Sonoran desert drive is not
meant for a high volumes of traffic and our beautiful Sonoran desert would be ruined with the addition of
housing developments along Sonoran Desert Drive.
We moved here for the a handful of reasons, one of them was the beauty of the state. But that seems to keep
getting chipped away, literally.
It is important to preserve the natural desert landscape and prevent overbuild that will destroy habitats.
Adding additional homes when there is no road infrastructure will add so much traffic. I drive SDD and there are
times when there are more than 25 cars backed up at the intersection of Cave Creek Rd. Also I am concerned
about closing up the wash between SDD because animals need to be able to traverse the entire wash. I am not
against the original number of homes but to increase it to what TM is asking is a lot more homes. The Sonoran
Preserve is very beautiful and I enjoy biking there but it is hard to cross the street with the current amount of
traffic on Dove Valley Rd and the Verdin Project will triple the amount of traffic.
Enjoy bicycling through the preserve. The road is too narrow for the traffic already using the parkway.
I live here and traffic is already getting too much! We moved here 10 years ago to be out in the desert!!! I hike
on the trails at least twice a week! Please keep more desert!
Page 532
The beauty and quiet of the desert and the Mountain views are priceless. This is why I live in Arizona. The clean
air and the wild life are amazing. The wilderness of the preserve needs to be maintained.
The Sonoran Preserve is absolutely beautiful and filled with flora and fauna unique to the area. Sonoran
Preserve should remain natural for the benefit of the critters who live there.
Beautiful desert scenery and nearby desert recreation like hiking and biking.
It is vitally important that the Sonoran desert preserve is kept safe from over population of the surrounding
areas! The overbuilding of the area will degrade the beautiful that we and future generations need in our lives
to create the balance of city living. It’s critical! Over building followed by extremely high traffic increases will
destroy the preservation of it’s natural beauty. I ask that the members of the Phoenix City Counsel hear our
concerns and uphold the Desert Character Overlay District as it was intended.
The beauty of the desert & also a place for the animals to live. We gave already taken enough of their home.
We need to protect our beautiful desert. There are many other areas to build on so we can all appreciate the
scenery. After all this is why we live here.
Use that area to bike the trails. Want to keep the space natural beauty not filled with homes.
Traffic congestion, pedestrian and bicycle safety. Preserving this area from development, as envisioned by the
Desert Character Overlay District.
The beauty of this Preserve area should be PRESERVED. There is a reason why the DCOD exists.
As a 4th generation native Arizonan, I adore our beautiful desserts and believe we must take great care in
unbridled expansion of urban growth. This project would place a huge strain on the perserve area, parkway,
noise, and environmental elements.
Without a road plan for major increase in traffic and the current drought in AZ, I oppose developments like
Not only do I enjoy the scenic view along Sonoran Desert Drive, but I strongly believe our future to continue to
live in Phoenix depends on limiting new developments the number one reason being our limited water supply.
We are already in water crisis. How can we continue to develop and build and be able to meet our water needs.
This is scary for already established residents. How will my home value be impacted if there is no water? My
second concern for this development is how it will impact my home value. With increase in traffic, and
development of additional major roads right by my house obstructing views and increasing noise levels, my
home value will most likely be negatively impacted. My house backs up to the beautiful desert and as homes
continue to be built in the desert, our view continues to diminish. Lastly, so many animals that live in the
Sonoran desert will be displaced. With so many developments currently taking place in this area, the animals
have no where to go. We are destroying our habitats, which will further contribute to climate change,
continuing droughts, increasing fires making this location less desirable to live.
Natural beauty along with reduced noise, traffic and night lights.
Love the beauty of the area. So peaceful to drive along and see the plants and trees, which would be lost
forever with more housing. Please save this beautiful area for our children and all those who come after them.
I am signing this petition as I care deeply about keeping the Sonoran preserve sacred. It is important to preserve
the existing ecosystems. Additionally, This area is already dangerous with increasing traffic.
The Sonoran Desert is home to many species. It's important for their survival that their habitat isn't cut up by
roads and other development.
I have lived in Sonoran Foothills for 15 years. I do not want to see my beautiful natural desert destroyed. I like
living in a quiet and not so busy area of town. I would be devastated if Sonoran desert drive turns into another
freeway right next to my house. I specifically moved in this area to get away from the noise and traffic. The
natural wildlife here will also be destroyed which part of the character of this area.
Preserve recreation area that is part of and enjoyed by our community. Prevent gross over development which
will destroy the desert community which we call home
Would love to keep this scenic drive the way it is. Scenic.
We value the beauty of the preserve and feel strongly it should be maintained.
Page 533
I have been hiking at the Sonoran Preserve for years with my son and my dogs. We love the beauty and the
feeling of being in the wilderness just a couple of miles from our house in Valley Vista. I know our area is
experiencing tremendous growth right now but I feel the area on the preserve needs to continue to be
My family and I enjoy this land and don’t want to see this over crowded We use this nature and Beautiful
preserve in north Phoenix area.
It’s critically important to protect the preserve and maintain the natural beauty of the area. This is why so many
of us moved here. It’s already not safe to leave the neighborhood with people speeding and limited visibility of
the rolling road. Added traffic would make routine activities no longer enjoyable.
Great hiking and exploring area.
The Sonoran Preserve is a promise to keep our beautiful desert pristine. Encroachment of more homes breaks
that promise. The delicate balance of between humans and wildlife is already teetering in the wrong direction.
Let’s save some beauty for future generations.
I support maintaining the desert overlay requirements for the Sonoran preserve. We need to maintain a healthy
balance between nature and development and not allow these safeguards to be discarded for development of
any current or future projects.
We moved up to the area because there was space and open land. We don’t want to live where people are on
top of each other and traffic is out of hand. Don’t ruin our beautiful space.
There are so many communities being built simply for the benefit and profit of the builders that little attention
is given to the people who actually want to have both, a beautiful home in a beautiful well thought out
community where the desert we live in is represented and not just the interest of the builders bottom line. Do
the right thing for a change.
I hike and bike in the preserve and love listening and seeing all the blooms, wild animals and quietness the
desert has to offer. Please quit the over building that is going on! Preserve our water resources!!
Preserve the desert hiking areas.
I live near this area and use it all of the time. Love it! The area is getting congested already and it’s starting to
ruin this special area/space we have available to us to enjoy nature.
I want to preserve our current area and I bike 6 days a week in what I already consider dangerous traffic to get
to the preserve and ride the path!
What comes after houses? Walmart, McDonald's, Circle K. Build on the west side of I‐17!
I participate in running and hiking in the area and treasure the natural beauty of the desert landscape.
The Desert Character Overlay was put in place to preserve open spaces and promote responsible development.
Develeopers should not be allowed to bypass rules and guidelines. Please maintain the integrity of Overlay
safeguards for the sake of the future of our community.
We need to protect these lands and stop paving over the natural beauty of this Preserve. There is a reason it is
called a Preserve. Let’s preserve it and the abundant plants and wildlife that call it home!
The speed at which the traffic flows is about 20 over the speed limit and it is a matter of time before a biker is
killed. This is happening currently and with more traffic /homes it will be worse. We don’t have the school
space to support more homes. We moved up north to get away from traffic and now the desert is at risk of
being destroyed by more builds.
I hike thru the preserve almost everyday. It is a beautiful and peaceful area amid the city. Losing this area to
Korea housing would be awful. There is so much development everywhere so these special areas are becoming
all the more important to spare or not over develop. Once it is gone it can not be replaced. Please don't let this
wonderful area be ruined by more over development!
We bought a home in this area in 2009 with the idea that the Sonoran Preserve would remain a Preserve. We
and many of our neighbors enjoy using the walking, hiking and biking trails because of its serenity. Please don't
let the lure of developers'money start chipping away at it. The city invested a lot to create the trails and the
Apache Wash trailhead. Let's preserve the Preserve.
Page 534
We do not want this new development because we love the natural desert we chose to live near. In addition,
we do need the excessive amount of traffic that such a development would cause.
I live in the area. I don’t want to see any further development in the Sonoran desert preserve area. I ride my
bike through there and drive through there frequently. I have already noticed how dangerous it is for bicyclist
and that road is becoming extremely congested. Adding a new development will only make matters worse.
I’d be like to see less traffic and houses. This a beautiful area, and treasure our Sonoran preserve.
There is no landscape in the United States like our beautiful Arizona deserts. It is critical that they be protected
as well as the wildlife in them!
Want beauty while biking
Myself and so many of my neighbors and friends hike this area on a regular basis! There is a nest that an owl
comes back to every year! There are beautiful fees of the amazing area in which so many of us call home! Please
don’t destroy an area we love and cherish
One of the main reasons we bought our house here in 2018 was because of it’s location in relation to the
Preserve. Already traffic has become a nightmare with the recent developments and removing the Preserve will
only exacerbate an already horrible problem. Also, to quote the great Joanie Mitchell, “you don’t know what
you’ve got til it’s gone.” Losing the Preserve would cause irreparable damage to the environment and the
The Sonoran Preserve along Sonoran Desert Drive allows us close appreciation of the scenic desert and its
thriving ecosystem. Other parts of the valley are better equipped for growth and infill. We need to embrace
density where the city is more prepared to support it. This patchwork sprawl into the outer reaches of the
desert chops up the expanse of habitat unnecessarily. If it continues, we can only look forward to small patches
of desert brush between homes as opposed to miles of our unique desert that we can all enjoy.
Preserve the natural beauty of the AZ desert.
It's a beautiful, natural preserve. It's a generous drive and the hiking and biking trails amid the serene desert are
therapeutic.
The Desert Character Overlay District should be adhered to.
I want to keep the area accessable for recreation.
It is a beautiful drive and I am sad to see they have done any development along this stretch of road. I thought
this was a preserve but it doesn't seem like it lately with all of the signs I have seen go up lately.
After retirement, I moved here from the city specifically to enjoy the Sonora Preserve. To lose the beauty of
The Preserve would be nothing short Of a crime.
I live around the corner in Sonoran Foothills community and one of the reasons we moved here was to be able
to bike on Dove Valley and Sonoran Desert, as we train for Triathlons year round. Every car you add to these
roads makes this more dangerous for us. I have almost been hit twice by cars coming out of Sonoran Gate
community. The proposed development of over 1400 homes will destroy this very special area.
As a resident living at Fireside, I have seen javelinas (up to a dozen at a time) and other wild animals come up to
our home looking for food and emptying garbage at night. By tearing down more natural and wild habitat for
additional homes will only increase the existing problems for the animals in the dessert when more of their
natural habitat is torn down. Stop tearing in to the natural surrounding preserve.
The beauty of the Sonoran Preserve will be replaced with urban area???? During the hike or bike ride are we
supposed to admire the houses???
This area was set aside to preserve nature and all her beauty. yes the land is very valuable but so is central park
in New York. Preserve means exactly that PRESERVE
I live in Sonoran Gate. I hike Apache Trail.
For the animals. We can’t continue to build on their land. They are constantly being pushed out. This earth
cannot sustain all the building
Page 535
There is no need for additional housing in our area specifically so near a protected preserve. There is not enough
water so support the additional homes and businesses that come with a development such as this.
Jennifer Walter
The Desert Charter Overlay District is in place to protect the Preserve. We are simply asking to maintain
adherence to it. Other than profit, there is no valid reason to break the Charter. If housing shortage is an
argument, then investors should absolutely look to revitalize and invest in existing residential spaces.
We moved to this area to enjoy the beautiful desert landscape that it offers unlike many other Phoenix areas.
To destroy this beauty that offers hiking, biking, and general nature opportunities so close to home would be
devastating for my family, not to mention the traffic that it would bring. Our neighborhood is already being
robbed of its quiet and peace from the houses already built on this road and it’s use as a through street. People
speed through at 50+ miles per hour to the point that it is difficult for me to turn left out of my gate. I can’t
imagine the impact on this traffic should more homes be allowed through the preserve. Let’s keep this beauty
to enjoy. Things like this are disappearing from the Phoenix area. We must save this.
This preserve is important for the community and wildlife!
There are plenty of areas to do future developments we shouldn’t marginalize the beauty of the Sonoran
Sonora Desert Drive is a highlight of living in the area, and provides a safe place to walk and bike near the
preserve. For those of us who live along the road, this is a matter of peace and safety, but for our wildlife, this is
a matter of survival. Allowing the Verdin development company to increase the number of planned housing
units would increase noise and traffic, endangering cyclists in the bicycle lane and make it unnecessarily
dangerous for the wildlife of the Sonoran Desert Preserve to cross the road.
My concern is for public safety first and foremost. In addition to the widening of the Sonoran roadway and the
disregard for the serenity of the desert. Finally I feel the City is growing too fast with little regard for Public
Safety and infrastructure growth.
I frequently recreate in the area ‐ it is frequented by a lot of people. Both on the road with limited traffic and on
the trails. It would be detrimental to the foundation of the Phoenix Preserves to take away land dedicated to
open space and letting developers tear it apart. Developers can get land further out on the outskirts of town to
develop ‐ not areas already dedicated as open space for all to recreate now and future generations.
We live in the Sonoran Gate community. I’m also a cyclist. We moved here to escape congestion and enjoy the
outdoors. All of that is threatened with this current building frenzy. Why would we abandon the express
purpose of these Preserves, so carefully planned and uniquely executed?! And where are we finding a
sustainable water supply for this unbridled development? This is madness.
I live in the vicinity of the preserve. I moved here to be close to nature and removed from the hustle of town. I
have enjoyed having wild animals pass through my backyard, but since all of the building along Sonoran Desert
Drive/Dove Valley began, wildlife sightings near my home have decreased dramatically. We are edging the
native species out of their rightful territory. Please do not butcher the desert any further.
We need to preserve the open spaces that attract so many to the area for recreation. There is a lot of building
of high occupancy units and housing underway. Schools are already at capacity, new services are being built on
Jomax to ease the influx, road infrastructure needs to be in consideration to.
It is very important to retain our natural desert and the Sonoran Preserve.
There would be too much traffic and it will ruin the beauty of this area of the desert. There are enough
developments in the area and we need to keep these areas open.
There are many other places to develop. None of those areas are as “Arizona Natural” as the Sonoran Desert
area. Preserve this area for people to enjoy not trash with developments.
There is enough congestion and traffic as it is. Not to mention, our beautiful desert is continually being built in.
Page 536
This beautiful desert area needs to maintain its character and uniqueness. It’s the reason why many people live
in the area. Stop!!
The main reason we bought our home in this location was because of how beautiful the desert is and very
peaceful. Almost feels like we're out of town in our very own neighborhood. Also, there is already an
infrastructure challenge with the lack of grocery stores, restaurants, gas stations etc. Adding 1200 more homes
would have a major impact on everything around us and create serious traffic issues to go anywhere, even on
We are in a huge water shortage all over the country and building in our preserves just takes more resources
that we all need to survive!
Standards are acceptable as they are set. I have many safety concerns through that Corridor. This is purely profit
over planned and locals paying the price.
Deserts are fragile environments/ecosystems and overcrowded land use will create problems that will take
generations to correct. Native species need to have their environment protected.
Councilman Waring, please continue to protect the Sonoran Preserve.
So many animals will get displaced from there natural habitats.
There are limited resources that we can all share and enjoy. The Desert Character Overlay District was
established to allow for growth but also to protect our wonderful desert. We are responsible for the
stewardship of this desert for future generations.
We moved here 3 years ago. We knew we wanted this home when we were driving around the home and drove
down sonoran desert drive. We loved that the desert was so close to us, that we were going to live to close to a
preserve that our kids could learn about the Arizona and the desert right out their back door.
I live right next to it and want to see it preserved.
Traffic is already too heavy and congested. Our streets are becoming dangerous.
We need to start limiting the amount of residential builds in the Sonoran Preserve area before this majestic
natural place is no more. Preserve the habitat and recreational area this land offers local residents and tourists.
The area is already congested and poses safety concerns for bicyclists, hikers and drivers due to the increased
motor traffic activity. Adding more congestion would further escalate the risk and concern associated.
It's a Beautiful area for our community. Hiding companies should stay within how the area is zoned
It's going to change the complete landscape of our community. I do not want an excessive amount of traffic.
I live in Sonoran Gate. Moved here to be by my sons. One lives in Sonoran Gate also (6 houses away). We
moved here for the beauty and serenity of the desert preserve. Our hope was to continue to grow our family
and ensure our next generation will also have the opportunity to enjoy the beauty of this area. Hot air Balloons
and bike riders every morning. It’s a place of beauty, calmness and peace. Please do not destroy this gift. Thank
I bought 20 years in area specifically for the landscape and to be outside the city. We have so many accidents
and fatalities due the EXCESSIVE TRAFFIC. We can’t handle the i flux of cars students business. Phoenix not
supporting all the builds! What makes this area so desired is the preserve!!!
Once the natural land is gone we loose the gorgeous desert that many people move here for. Pollution has
gotten much worse in the past few years. More home mean more traffic and even worse pollution. The water
table is getting lower and more homes mean more water usage. We don’t have water for them!
No more building and take away from our desert landscape. Stop already.
I live near this area and enjoy hiking the mountain preserve. I also enjoy diving through Sonoran dessert drive
to see the beautiful landscape our state has to offer without having to drive so far away. Please don’t take this
We have lived in Sonoran foothills for 13 years. We have always loved how quiet it is up here and love the
beauty of the desert. Please do not build more homes and ruin all the great things we have up here!
To keep the nature as treasure and beautiful view
We love the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve. Please protect what is left and save the beauty of the dessert.
Page 537
While the continued expansion of homes and building into this area is inevitable and needed, the maintenance
of the Desert Character Overlay is important to keep the beauty and feel of this area. The residents who live
here moved here for a reason, and we appreciate the forethought that went into the Desert Character Overlay
originally. Please do not abandon this. It would be one thing if the builder were building reasonably priced
homes to assist with the affordable housing shortage, but they are not. This request is purely for the financial
advantage of the builder and the detriment of our community.
We moved to this area because of the preserve, and while we support growth, the aspects of the preserve that
can be protected, should be. It is our responsibility to growth responsively!
Desert overlay is in place to protect the area from over development. We use the preserve multiple times a
week as a family and more cars and will make it ever more difficult to access the amenities from our
We selected this area to live, in part, based on the feeling of being closer to nature. The Sonoran Preserve
played a big part in that feeling. The loss of any Preserve open space or the increase in traffic thru the Preserve
will diminish that feeling. Please require all developers to comply with existing develop restrictions and do not
"lessen" those restrictions. ‐ Thank you...
It is a spectacular preserve and should kept that way. This area can’t handle the traffic now let alone of more
developments are added.
Living by the beautiful Sonoran Mountain Preserve area and Sonoran Desert Drive, allows people to interact
positively with nature and the environment. This is necessary for people’s physical and mental well being,
which we all rediscovered during the pandemic when it was one of the few things people were allowed to do.
The Mountain Preserve allows people to connect with nature and enjoy the peaceful outdoor environment. The
people in the area love the open spaces and serenity that the Sonoran Desert Mountan Preserve provides. They
walk, bike or hike in the neighborhood everyday. If these developers are allowed to over develop this beautiful
area it will be a detriment to the already established neighborhoods by increased population through clustered
housing, traffic, safety, noise levels, over crowded schools, and a host of other issues. This mountain preserve is
vital to the well being and safety of people who chose to live for here for a better quality of life. Please don’t
allow these developers to destroy the Mountain Preserve. Thank you
I live in this area, I use the hiking trails and bike paths along Sonoran drive on a weekly basis, I love looking out
into the Desert everytime and taking in its natural beauty it has to offer, Roof tops would hinder this…. If the
county/city ever needs additional funding they can have Police officers patrol Sonoran Desert drive and would
run out of paper giving traffic tickets, its already a race track with the driving practices on this road,,,,, more
congestion will make it worst and a lot more dangerous than itvis now, I quit riding my bike in the bike lane on
that road, I ride on the bike path to the north of the road for that reason…
Like to go hiking there and see the natural views.
With all the apartments being built on the west end between Dove Valley & Sonoran Desert Drive, the traffic
will become just like the city streets—noisy and congested. Verdin proposing additional homes will make it that
much worse. In addition, we moved to this area because of the Sonoron Desert Preserve which is becoming non
We moved here to be next to open desert and away from valley traffic. Increasing to the proposed
developmentm will eliminate both of these coveted features!
The Sonoran Preserve was one of the most important reasons we purchased a house in this area. To continually
chip away at this wonderful area would be so detrimental to the wildlife that live there as well as the wonderful
hiking trails that allow people to get out and experience nature at its finest. I am strongly against ruining
anymore of the Preserve.
I want to protect the wilderness and essence of the preserve. I thought this land was protected from future
housing development
Please do not increase the level of traffic on sonoran desert parkway. The additional cars will increase risk to
current commuters and cyclists.
To adhere to our natural landscape and preserve the area and its wildlife.
Page 538
Bike safety Road overly congested
One of the reasons I moved to this area was because of the Preserve and being told it would not be developed.
How incredibly sad we're even needing to have this discussion. Please do the right thing and save the Sonoran
Why destroy a beautiful, well loved, piece of land when we already have too many houses.
I have many reasons for you to consider preserving the Sonoran Preserve and Sonora Desert Drive. Homes and
traffic directly impact the fragile desert. Urban heat, pollution, and human destruction directly destroy the
desert plants. The Sonoran Preserve was set aside for the specific reason of preserving an area for people to
enjoy the beauty of the desert. Adding homes along the Sonoran Preserve and Sonoran Desert Drive will
increase traffic. Solutions to traffic congestion is to add and or expand lanes which will take up desert land.
Lastly and more importantly, Arizona is in a major drought. More homes means less water. There are plenty of
homes and apartments being built in Phoenix without taking from the Sonoran Preserve and Sonora Desert
Two reasons: to preserve the beauty of the preserve and the hone of the animals living there. Second, is the
traffic. We are already experiencing new heavy traffic with our growth up here and adding this will increase it
greatly. I moved up this way because of the lifestyle it afforded without so much traffic. Along with the traffic
comes more accidents, which we are already experiencing, more congestion, etc.
This is a designated Desert Sonoran Preserve. The established trails are used by thousands and the preserve
hosts habitat for Arizona wildlife including javelina, bobcat, coyote, raccoon, ground squirrel and many more.
There are a variety of bird and reptile species Gila Monster, great horned owl, roadrunner, gambles quail, Inca
dove, Cardinals, spotted whip tail and chuckwalla lizards to mention a few. This area of Phoenix cannot be
expanded into a legislated preserve. Too many apartments in the area has already increased crime, drugs and
traffic congestion. Any additional housing and apartment development requests in the north Phoenix area must
be denied. Respectfully, Bill Shackelford. Voting Resident
Concerned about excessive housing & associated traffic density causing problems & congestion. Please do not
override Desert character Overlay District guidelines
I have lived in this area for over 16 years and am a native Arizonan. The City has done a wonderful job on
Sonoran Desert Drive, in terms of incorporating areas to recreate and enjoy the unbelievable desert scenery
within the Sonoran Preserve. I have hiked the area and marvel at the beauty. Increasing the planned housing
units by multiples of two or three will significantly detract from the area's beauty and tranquility and add an
unsustainable amount of traffic and introduce ecological damage to the area. There is a reason so much land
was designated as a preserve all those years ago. It should stay that way.
I purchased my house on the southern boundary of Sonoran Gate with the intent of enjoying the serenity of the
desert in my backyard. This expansion will teplace my view with a 6 lane high traffic road. The Scenic Dove
Valley road will also become increasingly busy affecting outdoor activities such as biking.
Please preserve the beautiful desert.
We moved from the city specifically to enjoy the natural preserve and wildlife of this area. Also, we were
assured no building would take place along the Sonoran Preserve corridor. Our family loves to bike ride in the
peaceful desert preserve and request that it remains a preserve for our wildlife and for all to enjoy in it’s natural
To preserve the natural desert. Traffic is already excessive. This area is amazing for bike rides, hiking & exercise.
Let’s keep it that way.
Arizona is destroying so much of the natural land that people moved here for. I don’t want more traffic. It’s
awful as it is. Water is at emergency levels and more homes will only tax the water levels more.
Ruin of preserve / increased traffic volume
We live in the area, have hiked these trails, our two boys attended nearby CCUSD Horseshoe Trails elementary
school, and I’d say that in general we have a strong desire to act as good stewards of this land and therefore
have a vested interest in maintaining the beauty of the Sonoran desert preserve and our balance with nature.
We need to preserve our natural habitat.Increased construction around the area already put too much load on
traffic and school system.We have no new building of schools and we are worried where all these will get
Page 539
The beauty and sanctity of Sonoran preserve and the surrounding area is vital to our wildlife and maintaining
there habitats is crucial to these animals that are being continually uprooted by builders and developers greed.
Traffic is already increasing on Sonoran dessert drive and frankly adding more homes will make it more
dangerous for people trying to enjoy the beauty nature is already providing us. We cannot keep destroying
Arizona’s natural beauty just to pad the pockets of a few and bring in more people to an already overpopulated
area, where policing these areas is challenging already for our stretched to the limit police force. Stop building
and start enjoying the beauty that our Sonoran preserve is providing us.
Too much growth and congestion. Lack of conservation to desert land and outdoor activities.
Overdeveloping is irresponsible when there’s no plan for increased traffic and water supply!
Keep our desert traffic and congestion to a minimum; we still enjoy a lot of wildlife.
We need less development and more room to safely enjoy nature with trails and outdoor activities. Dove Valley
Rd is already a speed zone and super trafficked, more development is a detriment to our beautiful Sonoran
Preserve. Please reject this proposal.
The scenery is beautiful along Sonoran Desert Drive and to see sections of it being developed for housing
projects will take away from the beauty that we have all come to love about this area.
The extra traffic flow will affect all the wild life amongst many other reasons.
The Sonoran Desert Preserve is so beautiful and serves MANY purposes. That's why we moved here, and we
don't want to lose it ! We MUST keep development at a reasonable amount.
We moved up here to be away from the crowds and we love the desert landscape And the air quality is better
for our son who has asthma
This project has the ability to set precedence for any other development. The fact the developer is asking to
refine for more houses and remove the desert overlay is a slippery slope to having high density homes stacked
on what is one of the mist beautiful areas of desert. It is too dense, goes against city plans meant to protect the
desert character of north Phoenix and will bring an influx of traffic to the area. Please look at giving up some
land somewhere else that is not across from a beautiful nature preserve.
My family and I are avid cyclists, and for the past five years we have seen an increase of cars and speed. I myself
had a couple of car and motorcycle incidents due to the amount of traffic and their speed. I’m worried that with
the increase of housing it’s only going to make our rides more dangerous, as drivers don’t respect speed limits.
Please keep the overlay as it was intended. Don’t put money over our safety. Thank you
I want it to remain natural. Don’t want more noise, development coming to the area.
We do not want the sonoran preserve to be destroyed just to build some additional homes. The traffic is already
a major problem and there is not enough infrastructure and businesses around here to support all these homes.
To much growth for what this area was set up to be.
I moved to this area because I love the open spaces.
I am for protecting as much land as possible and conserving water.
It’s a beautiful area to walk or hike or bike and it’s the last area I know of that is close to me. Otherwise I’d have
to drive over 40 minutes to find a preserve that is wild and natural
The Sonoran Preserve needs to be saved, it provides recreation like walking, hiking and biking. Also, it keeps the
heat down. Adding more homes will only create more traffic. One of the reasons we moved to this area is due
to this Sonoran Preserve.
The traffic currently traveling on Sonora Desert Dr is already at a dangerous amount. Not specifically due to
frequency or number of users, but due primarily to their speed on the roadway. The current speed limit is
45mph, but traffic regularly travels in excess of 60mph. This in combination with the vulnerable users of the
road and the addition of a significant amount of vehicles is a disaster in the making for the roadway as it is now.
Traffic concerns and safety for cyclists along SDD.
Page 540
I love the desert landscape, and enjoy hiking on my time off work. I see the amount of buildings that are being
constructed and the traffic it is creating. Please do not destroy the little bit of desert that exists in this large city,
the habitat of our beloved desert animals.
I am a third generation Phoenician and have lived in North Phoenix most of my life. I have watched the growth
of the valley over the years and am not opposed to progress but it needs to be done thoughtfully and
responsibly. This proposal to increase the number of homes along the Sonoran Desert drive is reckless and
irresponsible. The developers of the Verdin project are not thinking about the residents of the area or the future
generations that will use the preserve but are rather motivated by the lure of maximizing their profits. I am
strongly opposed to discarding the charter and hope that as our representatives you will do the right thing for
the citizens of this area. Seriously take into consideration what’s best for not only the residents but also the
wildlife and the desert itself. This decision will not only impact our quality of life but the quality of life for those
that will come long after we’re gone. A sea of homes and pushing more and more people into an untouched
area of desert is not good for the future of our community.
We moved here from Chicago to near a more spacious beautiful desert area. We've watched the traffic increase
three fold which takes away from safety and the beauty of the land. We moved her to be near the natural
preserves, hike, bike and enjoy nature. In the almost 6 years we've been here we rarely see the wild life we've
come to love no longer around. Traffic on North Valley is dangerous at times.
Beautiful drive and prime hiking area
The Sonoran Preserve was the deciding factor for my wife and I to move to this area. We had hoped that
Preserve would stay as it is a Natural desert landscape that was protected for all to enjoy. We enjoy the
numerous hiking trails, walking areas that are safe and the pavilions that we use to gather with friends . We
knew that there would be issues when we seen new developments popping up and took away the Natural
surroundings. This has to stop . Did I mention the wildlife that we all see and enjoy? These developments are all
about one thing ‐ greed. Please let this continue to be the Sonoran Preserve!
Wide open space without traffic & housing congestion, w/o water & schooling requirements is vital to this area
of the Sonoran Preserve.
Additional development will ruin the Sonoran Reserve’s pristine nature. Please preserve this vital area for our
Desert’s wildlife for generations to come to enjoy .
The Donoran a preserve is a peaceful area used by many people for hiking, mountain biking and horseback
riding. Adding more houses will increase the number of people using the trails as well as create more traffic in
I do not wish to see this beautiful desert landscape overcome with more traffic and houses.
I’m concerned about all the animals in the area. As well as if you continue to build what about the schools and
the traffic. It no longer will be a peaceful environment. And the more expensive homes you build people really
can’t afford them but end up in bankruptcy and then they’ll be empty
I ride my bike religiously on Sonoran Drive and bike safety for our cyclist should be a main concern and priority.
I am very concerned about the additional traffic volume that will be a result of large Verdin community. I am a
triathlete who uses Sonoran Desert Dr. daily for training and with the increased traffic I fear for my safety. In
addition, we moved to this area (85085) for the beauty of the desert. Abandoning the Desert Character Overlay
District will eliminate the protections that were placed to ensure conservation of the ecosystems in the area
while still allowing for some development. The large number of homes the Verdin development company
proposes to squeeze into this area will detract from the wilderness and beauty of the Preserve. Yet, another
area of concern would be the overcrowding of schools in the Deer Valley School district.
Page 541
The desert in the Sonoran Desert Preserve is already quite overused by hikers, bikers and equestrian riders. By
increasing the population adjacent to this preserve, not only will it lose its true wilderness experience, but it will
have increased urban pressures placed upon it, threatening its very existence. Additionally, as I live just meters
from Dove Valley Trail and witness the already heavy traffic along this corridor that connects to Sonoran Desert
Drive, any increased volumes in traffic would effectively make it very difficult to exit my community onto Dove
Valley Road where no traffic lights exist.
Area should remain as it is. Area is also over populated with new homes and congestion with traffic.
Sonoran Desert Drive & surrounding preserve area can not accommodate traffic volume due to proposed Verdin
development.
Ignoring the desert character overlay district would be a HUGE mistake. Overdevelopment will ruin the desert
and will change the habitat in and around that area and big developers don’t care about that so it’s our job to
care for them.
Traffic is already becoming very busy along Sonoran Desert Drive. Many large trucks are using this now too. We
were told this area was supposed to preserve the Sonoran Desert. Many people use the bike paths and hiking
paths. I feel it would become more dangerous to use these paths with the increase of doubling or tripling traffic
with the increased number of homes they are asking for. Keep the same number of homes it was originally
I am a city of Phoenix park steward for the far north valley preserves including Apache Wash and Dixie
Mountain. I patrol these trails for hiker safety several times of month. The beauty and open desert landscape of
the Sonoran area is a prime reason why people move to this area or visit it to hike or bike. Please do not add
higher density housing and destroy the open land we currently enjoy.
The growth in this area is already at an all time high. This small area of desert PRESERVE is why many of us
moved to the area. The PRESERVE is used by hikers and bikers as a beautiful getaway that is in our backyard.
Every other inch has already been developed by apartment complexes. Enough!! Leave our PRESERVE alone!!
I do not want the desert destroyed any more than it already has been, it needs to be preserved. I hike daily
along the trails from Apache Wash to Paloma Pkwy, the scenic views are being compromised by building, the
noise of the traffic is ruining the peace of the outside and nearing running me off the road as I try to cross to the
trails. It's insane the number of cars already and Copperleaf development isn't even populated yet. No more
homes to destroy the serenity and beauty of this area.
I prefer an environment that is a balance between housing and open land
This drive is very vital for bikers and the natural trails and parks the residents across the city come to enjoy. The
new development across the dedicated Sonoran landscape is going to spoil everything and increase the safety
concerns on the biking corridor. This corridor is used by Olympic gold medal winners , Tour de France
Maintain the natural open space in this areas Traffic congestion issues
The Desert Character is an important part of Phoenix that needs to be kept preserved and available for all
Phoenicians and other AZ residents to enjoy the natural scene this Sonoran Desert can provide outside of the
busy metropolis of the Phoenix metroplex and other surrounding cities.
Need to preserve as much of our beautiful mountains as possible
Wildlife protection and natural beauty
Our desert is part of our lifestyle's. Many of us hike and enjoy our desert landscape. The area is not built for
even 400+ homes, with an average of 2 vehicles per home. Our local school system doesn’t support the vast
amount of new developments going up currently. It’s will also decrease night visibility of the sky in the evening
for those who use telescopes. It will also increase area emissions, pollution visibility, and area temperature.
People need places to live but so do animals. The Southwest has beautiful deserts and what makes this place
I moved up in this area to get away from the city, crowds and traffic, enjoy the outdoors to hike and cycle.
We need to keep as much of the natural habitat in this area as possible for the enjoyment of all residents and
Page 542
Too much traffic already
My family and I love hiking in the Sonoran Preserve. It’s how we spend our weekends. We would hate to lose
anymore of the land, the atmosphere, the animals. Please save the land. Thank you
Our family enjoys the scenic drive down Sonoran Desert Drive. I’m saddened to hear they already have plans to
develop some of that land. The dessert landscape and easy access to trails from Fireside are unique to living in
Norterra and I would hate to see that change. It’s already becoming over crowded up here and traffic is
effected. Please consider preserving our beautiful desert landscape.
Want to keep area lower traffic
GREED at its finest asking to ignore the Desert Character Overlay District... PLEASE DO NOT ALLOW THIS!!!!
Seriously...one more development along the route is no good. Too much traffic now for those who frequent the
area.
I have lived here for 10 years and watched the beauty of the desert being destroyed with development. The
plants, animals and the majestic beauty of the desert is ruined by the continued development until there is no
desert left. It is very sad.
I absolutely love the beauty of the desert and the opportunity we have to get out in the preserve to hike, run
and bike. I am an avid trail runner and hiker and would be devastated if we lose that ability just to make way for
more houses.
The Preserve is meant to be just that——preserved. Excess traffic, construction and increased carbon footprint
will endanger the flora and fauna of our beautiful desert. Please protect it!
1. Concerned about wildlife being displaced and natural habitats being significantly reduced 2. High occupancy
buildings coupled with houses will bring more traffic and pollution and impact the infrastructure 3. Impact on
city resources such as water especially scary as water levels are so low 4 impact to education facilities ‐ schools
are over crowded
We love biking on the path along the reserve with our 2 girls, crossing Sonoran Desert is already a bit nerve
wracking with current traffic, I can't imagine how much this would increase given the added homes. This is such
a beautiful stretch of road and adding these homes would greatly impact the noise, traffic and beauty of this
area. Not to mention the surrounding grocery stores, roadways and restaurants are already stretched so thin
because the number of homes has increased greatly without the other resources to support it!
The area should be preserved for enjoying the natural surroundings.
Please save the desert preserve, this is very important! Thank you
Need Preserve, otherwise we will lose out on the beautiful scenery and have way to much congestion.
I love this natural area. It is very important that the building be kept down as we are losing our natural areas to
concrete and overdevelopment. AZ does not have enough water for all of these homes/buildings. Traffic is
horrendous already. Please don’t do this.
It changes the whole landscape of our community. Every available space is being built and we are losing the
beauty of our area.
We need to keep as much nature untouched and beautiful.
The Sonoran preserve is just that, “A preserve”. It was specifically zoned to prevent this kind of development,
or any development for that matter. We use this area almost on a daily basis for hiking, biking and driving on
the parkway. If these projects are developed and built I will seriously consider leaving this area and moving to a
quieter place. These builders should look for other areas not designated as preserves to build their housing.
Preservation of our land is critical. While I accept development that has been approved, businesses need to
consider the impact to the surrounding area and growth for the sake of growth is not an acceptable plan.
Page 543
Actions need to be taken to preserve the natural landscapes of Arizona. The degradation of lands is reaching a
tipping point. The area does not have the infrastructure, business, school capacity nor natural resources to
support this development. Corporate greed is advancing the rapid expansion of the Sonoran desert and we are
on the cusp of a major water shortages in the region. Enough, have some foresight for future generations for
Resource impact and cyclist safety
Keeping the integrity of the preserve intact while allowing current hiking, biking, and traffic levels to remain the
Have you seen how beautiful this portion of metro‐ Phoenix is. We absolutely do not need more and more and
more. We have enough people streaming into our state already, no need to encourage more.
The sonoran preserve is a beautiful place that is essential to maintaining the ecological balance for wildlife and
vegetation. The developers and owners knew the rules of the overlay district when they decided to develop,
and should be required to follow it. Not doing so benefits only them, and puts the damages on all other citizens.
The builder should be held to the character overlay that is in place to ensure the neighborhood fits into the
desert landscape.
The Preserve was the reason we moved here 14years ago. The city should not be able to re‐zone and stick with
the original plan to leave it for hiking biking etc. There is plenty of land on the west side of I‐17. Way too
much growth, traffic, and Desert lost to developers. with NO regard for the quiet life we enjoy In north Phoenix.
Too much housing buildout, let's slow it down
We need to keep our natural surroundings for the overall health of our environment.
We only get one chance to maintain the character of our community. Once altered, there is no going back.
We need more open space and already have enough homes!
As a former 12 year resident of the Desert Canyon subdivision (32nd / Beardsley) I have supported the efforts of
SOS‐P since the rezoning signs went up. I find it deeply ironic and fundamentally offensive that the first ask of
the developer is to set aside law and planning already in place that ensures what they only pretend to espouse
(“ environmental commitment to raising the bar for protecting and preserving the desert environment”).
We love the beauty and tranquility of the desert.
I hike on the trails of the Sonoran Preserve many times a week, enjoying the beauty of the untouched desert. It
would diminish the quality of the experience by adding more and more housing developments to the view.
The Sonoran preserve is a spot where I hike, bike and run 5‐6 times per week. I truly enjoy the beautiful natural
preserve this area has. The animals I see during my adventures is also priceless. I truly hope this petition
makes a change !
I live very close to the Sonoran Preserve. My family and I love living near the preserve because we get to enjoy
beautiful hiking and biking trails right in our back yard. The trails are clean, well maintained and much less
crowded than other trails in Phoenix, such as Camelback Mountain and Piestewa Peak. The Sonoran Preserve is
the reason we moved the North Valley. And we moved here based on the growth parameters identified by the
Desert Character Overlay District, which were instilled to safeguard the Preserve. Please don’t alter the growth
density plans, it’s not good for the viability of the Preserve and it’s not fair to the residents who moved to the
area based on the development measures in place.
It is important to save the Preserve and Drive because developers and their need for more and more money is
literally killing the desert and taking away all things that are indigenous to this perfect State I have lived in my
whole life, born and raised. I have worked up in this area for 20 plus years and it has been so sad to see the loss
of the desert. The Sonora Desert Drive is something so special and one of the few places left in the Valley that
makes you feel like you are really in the desert without thousands of pieces of property. Please do not take
away the beauty of these areas!!!
We love going to the preserve as a family, and having another major development project will only bring more
traffic, noise, and wildlife displacement. We need to do better and protect our wildlife and say no to money
Traffic will increase dramatically! Hiking and cycling will no longer be enjoyable and r safe.
Page 544
My household enjoys both biking and hiking along the Sonoran Desert Drive several times a week. One of the
main reasons I moved out of the Kierland area was to escape the traffic/congestion. Please don't turn my
beautiful Sonoran Preserve into a traffic nightmare. Uphold the safeguards that make this preserve a treasure.
Thank you, Councilman Waring.
Me and my friends use that area to ride our bicycles and hike and just enjoy the desert and it would be
dangerous with it a lot more traffic out that way and it will destroy the beautiful desert environment please do
This will affect the local fauna and flora and compromise what is supposed to be a protected ecossystem.
Traffic is already heavy and dangerous for my wife who bikes and myself walking
It is nature at its finest. The desert is dwindling especially in this area with all of the commercial building and
housing going up. The hot air balloons are even running out of space to take off from and land on. Dove Valley
Road / Sonoran Desert Drive has become a speedway and dumping ground. It is a shame that people have such
disregard for such a beautiful area and putting up more housing will only make it worse. Years ago we were told
that no homes would be built off of that road. I know because I used to live in Carefree Crossings and attended
many meetings about it. Listen to the people for a change and leave this area alone. It was built for people to
enjoy it, not destroy it.
We need to preserve the beauty of the desert.
I use the preserve at least 3 times a week for fitness. Mountain biking, hiking, and trail running. Wildlife
encounters are always beautiful and their habitat must be preserved. The human population density in this area
is already getting to be more than what it can sustain.
We need to limit desert impact & traffic in the area as it’s already getting congested.
Phoenix is growing at a very rapid rate. If something is not done now to save lands, there will be no desert areas
left and all wildlife here will perish. We must preserve this unique Sonoran Preserve.
We love our desert and the fascinating wild life! Lets all work together to conserve our beautiful desert!
We need to preserve the hiking and biking trails as well as the bike lane on Desert Sonoran Drive to keep it safe
for pedestrians and cyclist.
The Sonoran Preserve is a beautiful area that lends this neighborhood a great amount of character and appeal.
Over‐development would greatly detract from this, leaving it just another sprawl.
I urge City Council to require Taylor Morrison to comply with Desert Character Overlay safeguards. We moved
to this area because of the close proximity to hiking and biking and close to nature. This is necessary for
people’s physical and mental well being.
We need to maintain the beauty of the valley. Areas need to be protected and respected so all can enjoy.
Quality of Life will be destroyed! Let us start with habitat destruction. Then let's discuss the water shortage.
September 2021, it was reported that the Bureau of Reclamation has declared a water shortage on the Colorado
River, which means that Arizona, along with Nevada and Mexico, will get less water than normal by 2022. If we
continue to destroy our desert with unnecessary development for the sake of the almighty dollar then we might
as well lift all restrictions. When will it end? When is enough growth enough? Maricopa County was the number
one county in the nation for growth in the past year. This needs to stop! We are destroying our human habitat
by allowing these developers to bully their way into these areas. Now let's discuss safety? Look at our Police
Dept or lack thereof. We can't sustain this ridiculous growth. Please do what you can to help preserve our
beautiful Sonoran Preserve!
Tjhis is the last strip of Sonoran Desert left in Phoenix. I'm sorrythe preserve doesn't border Dove Valley. Whats
done is gone do not make it worse by 3X the number of people
I prefer to keep the Somoran Preseve “wild” for all to enjoy. Please stop taking beautiful desert away from the
residents that moved here to be near it.
Primary reason we moved to this area from Houston is to avoid the glut of development and related traffic that
we had in Texas. Please let us retain the environment we fell in love with back in 2010.
Page 545
Too many people and too much traffic is bad for the environment and the people living in the area, like me.
Traffic will likely significantly increase staying within the growth guidelines, so ignoring the guidelines and
increasing the number of dwellings in the area beyond the guidelines will make traffic and life even worse.
I love to hike the trails with my dog and my family. It is often the only exercise my aging parents get.
Everywhere near Sonoran preserve and desert drive constructions are happening, it’s a very beautiful hike place
to enjoy quality time with family and friends, as a neighborhood resident I would like to keep it beautiful and
not have homes after homes getting built there… there are hardly any community park getting built in the area..
I urge you not to ignore the Desert Character Overly District and over develop one of the few remaining
preserves in city limits so a developer can make more money. Please consider your constituents way of life and
safety over profits for a corporation. Thank you for your consideration.
Traffic is my main issue. As a Sonoran bike route it is becoming more and more dangerous for bikers. School
traffic on main roads and through neighborhoods also has become more dangerous. Wilderness can never be
recaptured once homes are built so we have a once in a lifetime duty to save land for conservation and wildlife.
Thanks for listening
The Sonoran Preserve is important to me because of the beauty if the area and the animals that call it home.
Sonoran Desert Drive needs to remain a less busy road so it is safe for the bicyclists that use it for exercise and
the people that walk the path along the road and preserve.
We need to preserve it for the wildlife that lives in it and keep the beauty of the desert environment in tact.
My friends and family and their pets walk there every day! Also it’s called a PRESERVE!!! Preserve it!
We need to preserve the beauty of our natural habitats. There are already plenty of places that are zoned for
building. Please do not let greed ruin our neighborhood.
Protect the Sonoran preserve
We live in the area and do not need to have more houses built, apartments, etc. The traffic is becoming
unbearable, and to abolish the desert is a terrible thing for the wildlife and beauty of the desert. I enjoy hiking
We love walking, & biking sonoran desert drive. It's nice to be active in that pristine desert. Please keep the
DCOD safeguards active
Ekosystem Preservation of natural wild life
I have children and grandchildren, outside the gates, it's TOTALLY UNSAFE TO RIDE BICKES, TRAFFIC IS
ABSOLUTELY 💯 INSANE WHATTTT IF IT WERE YOUR NEIGHBOR HOOD? Thank you
Volume of traffic will be too extreme and hiking, cycling and just walking will be negatively impacted.
Biological and cultural resources
I hike from Apache Wash frequently as well as the trails in Sonoran Preserve South and don’t want to see the
desert character of these areas impacted. Please hold Taylor Morrison to these rules. They were put in place for
a reason. Don’t allow them to disregard them.
This city is growing so fast & we need to preserve some of the beautiful desert landscape. If we keep building
more houses, we will have nothing left. We don’t need more houses!!
I firmly feel that natural areas have to be maintained and protected in order to maintain the beauty and balance
of our communities. Doubling or tripling the traffic on the Sonora Parkway within the areas of the Preserve will
most definitely create safety issues with cycling and walking for all folks wanting to enjoy the beauty of the
This place is an amazing getaway for families to go walk, cycle and hike. It’s nice to go over there without all of
the traffic that goes through there. It is such a beautiful scenery that should not be taken away.
Our family enjoys the wildlife and open beauty that the preserve provides very much.
There has been enough development in this area. Stop crowding out the wildlife.
Overcrowding is harmful to animals and to people. There are already too many car accidents due to the current
road infrastructure doesn’t support the number of people in this area. Therefore, more growth in this area will
lead to higher traffic volumes and increased car accidents. Thank you for this opportunity to voice my concern.
Page 546
We love to hike this beautiful area. Also the drive down Sonoran parkway is incredible. We must preserve this
desert not only for human enjoyment but also the wildlife that call it home
This land is our closest access to nature. It is where I hike. It is where I take my children to visit the great horned
owl nest. This land is theirs—not to be traded in a land swap where a few people get rich at the expense of our
nature preserve.
It’s imperative to preserve and protect the wildlife and their natural habitat. This area is already exploding with
growth & traffic.
This area is beautiful and it would be a shame for it to be overdeveloped.
As a resident here, we need to preserve our natural habitat. You need to think about building more schools
before taking over the desert preserve and destroying the ecosystem just so you can make some builders happy
through these deals. If we can't preserve our "Preserve", then what is even the point?
I've lived in this area for many years and treasure the Sonoran Desert Preserve beyond measure. As an avid
hiker and lover of the unique beauty, plant life and wildlife of the Sonoran Desert, I feel privileged to be able to
enjoy this natural area as part of my "everyday." I'm also aware and incredibly proud of the hard work and
careful thought that went into preserving this land in the first place. It was a job so very well done, and I would
be incredibly disappointed and dispirited to see those efforts and safeguards dismantled in any way.
We chose to move to Sonoran Foothills to be close to the desert landscape and away from the dense population
of the city. We understood that the city had protected the areas surrounding the preserve by requiring certain
standards and limiting the number of homes that can be built. The requirements that were in place while the
Sonoran foothills community was being built, maintain the overall integrity of the surrounding desert. There is a
mix of apartment homes, patio homes and homes with lots. All were required to follow strict landscaping
guidelines to match the desert. Why aren’t these standards being upheld for any future development? It is
evident that greed is now winning. The home builders goal is to build as many houses as will be allowed as this is
most profitable for them. They are NOT concerned with the impact this will have on traffic, current residents or
the desert. Also, it appears the city is trying to solve the housing shortage by putting in a disproportionate
number of high density dwellings from I‐17 to Cave Creek.
There is already a staggering amount of traffic between the preserves and additional housing per acre only
harms these sacred areas. We are growing at a staggering rate and sacrificing our beautiful lands and existing
safe guards isn't the right approach to addressing this growth. The land and homes will sell and the only reason
to increase hones per acre is to increase their profits.
Original 2006 owner who has seen this area grow and change. I’m very concerned about the population over
expansion in this area. I live right off Dove Valley which has already become unsafe due to traffic volume and
lack of proper traffic signals (some of which are on the way). However, I don’t believe Dove Valley was ever
intended to hold the kind of volume it will experience if growth is not governed. I for one wholeheartedly
support the enforcement of the Desert Character Overlay District. Thank you
An agreement was made to limit the number of homes for the area, why now is it ok to go back on that. Will
bring more traffic and ruin to area from overpopulation.
The Sonoran Preserve is a special and somewhat rare piece of Phoenix. It provides beautiful trails and vistas for
all Phoenicians within the city limits. As the city continues to grow I believe we need to preserve these few
natural spaces for all to enjoy.
When we moved from Wisconsin we specifically picked the Sonoran Desert Preserve area because it was so
beautiful and peaceful. Please do not ruin it by putting up homes there. It is a protected preserve for a reason ‐‐
to keep it natural.
Way too much traffic
This area needs to be preserved as originally designed in order for the members of this community to enjoy a
place to get away from all the over development.
Page 547
Protecting preserve areas within an urban community is important and contributes to a healthy quality of life.
Respectful development along the perimeter of a preserve protects the integrity of the native area. I want the
desert overlay left in place as it is the legal vehicle created with intention to accomplish this. We need to be
forward thinking as we approve developments especially when they border preserve areas that were acquired
and built with significant personal and financial resources!
Desert preservation. Water conservation
The Sonoran Preserve and Sonora Desert Drive must under all circumstances remain intake and undisturbed
Preserving open spaces is becoming more and more important as they are being lost at a alarming rate.
Increasing housing density is damaging with increased traffic, pollution and water usage.
Our house backs up to the desert. We bought that house because it backs up to the desert, I want to to keep
our view and our slower simple lifestyle there and not turn its into a big city feel.
To preserve the beautiful views of the desert and maintain wildlife and landscape.
it's a natural treasure that is special and needs to be protected.
The Phoenix metro area is quickly consuming our natural wildlife. The Sonoran preserve and areas around the
preserve are blessings to those near them. An escape from the overgrowth of population.
Preserve natura
I am an avid mountain and road cyclist in THIS area, especially! I also hike and run in the preserve. Safe to say I
am absolutely for the preservation of the Sonoran Preserve. I live in an area very near where a housing
development is under way and the amount of houses being built will be over double what was originally zoned.
Please let those that run the show consider the longer (negative) lasting impacts of high‐density development to
what we have all found profoundly beautiful and desiring of this area; the Sonoran Desert!
I have lived in this area for 11 years and have been walking those trails for just as long. It is an amazing preserve
that I treasure walking every single day. The scenery is beautiful and the wildlife thrives in the area. Losing any
portion of this place would be a disgrace to this gorgeous piece of land that should be protected for the people
of our area. Please reconsider this, i am beyond disappointed to hear that this is even a thought. Please save our
Northern Phoenix is already getting overrun by new developments. Would be nice to keep some lands in their
natural state so we can enjoy the beauty it brings
My main hiking spot, beautiful views, would think u are out in the wilderness
I am concerned because my backyard will face the six lane road. As it is the two lane road(dove valley and
Sonoran dessert drive) is driven like a freeway and most people do not go the speed limit. I could just imagine
what the six lane would be like behind us. When we purchased this home we were not made aware of the plans
the city had for this area. Very disappointed. Also Verdin having 1400 hundred homes would really make the
traffic crazier than it already is right now.. like I said very disappointing!!
Desire to maintain the nature preserve and to limit traffic and related safety hazards.
No need for more development eating up our desert.
We moved to our current home to enjoy the benefits of having access to the Sonoran Preserve. The Desert
Character Overlay District was created to preserve the integrity of this precious commodity, if it is ignored, the
beauty and recreational benefits of the preserve will be significantly reduced.
I chose this area because of the preserve and hiking trails. We love the motorcycle rides through the area on our
way up to Cave Creek. I already think they are building too much and it’s going to overpopulate and ruin the
very reason we chose to live in this area.
I walk the desert everyday it is vital to keep it preserved . Arizona is in danger , water shortage , wildlife please
keep preserve
Our wildlife is being displaced and soon will not have a place to live. People want them killed as they are afraid
of them! We will live in a denser area and it will soon feel like NY City! We must find a balance for all.
Page 548
Conservation will protect the wildlife. Driving them out of their natural habitat could put some animals at risk of
extinction. There are other desert areas/land that could be built on. Preserving will help reduce our footprint
and help reduce traffic and pollution.
Keeping some semblance of the desert lifestyle is why we moved here. Do not ignore the safeguards. Reduce
the number of housing units. Why do you want to do business with a company which clearly does not respect
nature, but only the economic bottom line ‐$
This would cause pollution dust noise and would be harmful to our health
I am concern about the beauty of the Desert Landscape and more concerned about the increase in traffic that
will be on Dove Valley/Sororan Desert Drives. Besides Verdin there is also the new semiconductor plant going
up west of us that will increase traffic. There is also 2 other new housing developments going up on Dove Valley
and also Sonoran Desert Dr west of Paloma Pkwy. This will also increase traffic tremendously on Dove
Valley/Sonoran Desert Drives. Please be concerned that traffic could increase 10 times the current rate and that
your plan to expand lanes is already insufficient.
The Sonoran preserve area is vital to providing a habitats for all the wonderful creatures and wildlife in the area.
It also provides for great walking trails for people to enjoy and get exercise while exploring all that Arizona has
The Sonoran Preserve and surrounding area are why we moved to the North Valley 7 years ago. The natural
beauty and outdoor activities make it our special home. We need to manage and control growth so it will not
negatively impact our surroundings with excessive traffic. Thank‐you.
Preserve land is sacred and should maintained as suck to keep the value to it's community members.
Traffic on the preserve road is already quite busy during rush hour. Adding more homes will increase the danger
of the road and damage the beautiful desert.
The beautiful hiking biking and walking trails!! What they are proposing is way too many homes for in the
middle of the preserve!!
I moved to this location in 2019 to be away from congestion of traffic and buildings. I am already concerned
about the traffic on Sonoran Parkway/Dove Valley. I love the open desert and trails and lack of buildings. This
area needs these open spaces to remain as building and development is moving closer to the preserve on all
sides. Help save some precious desert/animals/freedom and peaceful nightblack skies!
As a resident of a nearby community I am concerned that the traffic that will be generated by the proposed
Verdin community will present many safety concerns. The Preserve provides a tranquil environment that will
most likely change dramatically in character if this densely populated community is built. I don’t mind some
building along the route but only if it is not populated as densely as some of the surrounding developments.
We need to save our desert preserve and wildlife. There are plenty if other placex in the area and in Phoenix
where it is more appropriate and less disruptive to build.
Destroying the desert, views and too much traffic on Dove Valley/Sonoran PkwyN which also funnels to Jomax
where many school‐aged child ride bikes and walk.
This is my neighborhood..I live here. I hike these beautiful trails five times a week. There are plenty of acres of
desert in other areas. People come from all over the valley to hike and bike here.This land has been set aside
for this and should not be taken away.
I am signing this because we would not have moved to this area had we known it was even possible for a
developer to unilaterally request a community density plan, carefully and deliberately produced and agreed
upon, be thrown out so a company can increase profit. I question the ethics of a company that would even
propose it. I question the ethics of a local government that would even entertain it.
Mark Dotterer
Marcella Mccormack
Page 549
This is a beautiful and vibrant part of our community. Don’t destroy it by adding additional residential
development. Once those houses get in there, they are going to be complaining and advocating for commercial
development because they don’t want to drive 20 minutes to shops and restaurants. Before we know it, all of
the preserve will be gone. The hiking trails, the nature, and the area is pristine.
It is important to me to keep our beautiful desert open and the way nature intended it to be. We are the desert
southwest and everyone should be able to enjoy the beautiful scenery. It does not do anything or anyone any
good to fill it with homes and commercial properties that would only increase traffic, smog, trash and unwanted
things. Our desert animals need their home and do not need to be pushed out due to unwanted construction.
I believe there are multiple reasons for keeping our views for all to enjoy ‐ to preserve the desert and the
animals ‐ so we can enjoy the solace in this wonderful area by walking, biking, driving or just plain relaxing in the
outdoors. Also driving on this Sonoran stretch of road currently needs more restrictions ‐ such as traffic lights at
all intersections for turning. Much speeding ‐ need to have more monitoring of speed requirements. Adding
more housing is just going to add to a lose of the desert preserve and impossible street/road conditions. When
we built our home here, we were told that there were restrictions to keep our desert preserved.
We live along the Sonoran Preserve. We bought here because it was a quiet peaceful area to raise kids and
explore nature. Please don’t allow more homes to destroy this area of nature. It will ruin the bike trail and
hiking trails and cause a lot more traffic in the area.
Concerned about traffic, School crowding, and preserving the desert. They need to keep the desert safe guards
in place.
We are losing the beauty and integrity of the area that makes the Phoenix valley iconic.
I moved to this area to enjoy the desert and the wildlife associated with the environment. Developers have one
objective ‐ money. We must preserve what is left of this beautiful landscape
My husband and I moved into the area specifically for the trails and wilderness of the Sonoran Preserve. We
hike the trails at least twice a week with our dogs. Please do not allow more encroachment just for the sake of
making more money! I am a retired registered nurse and served the indigent populations and can't afford to
move again. Please stop this!
I hike in the preserve almost daily, and would like to continue to enjoy the nature and the solitude. There are so
many other areas to build along the I‐17 corridor, so why cause more damage to the beautiful Arizona desert
and the wildlife living there. I used to hike Thunderbird, but that's a couple foothills with development all
around, whereas the Sonoran Preserve is just that ‐ a preserve to protect wildlife and allow people to enjoy
nature. Please don't allow any more development of the land!
ASU has spent millons in studies, to this DAY, of the wildlife is THIS IMMEDIATE area. The area between these
two washes are a habitat for species that exist NO where else. Contact ASU if you don't believe me, they have a
professor that performs studies out there...they have for many years! In addition, the access roads proposed
are between two bridges that are TOO low. There needs to be a NEW study performed on how the destruction
of the plains will affect run off and increased volume in the washes! Otherwise, one heavy monsoon might wash
the people and homes away.
We moved to this area specifically to enjoy the natural beauty of the desert Hiking, biking, and walking is an
important part of the north valley lifestyle Please do not allow developers to ruin it with dense urban housing
It's rare coming from Vegas to have such a natural landscape. It's so beautiful to have natural landscape and to
have the desert wildlife around our home. There's plenty of other places they can build and they're building
now. Save the preserve and the wildlife. They can build somewhere else that isn't here.
I’ve lived in the preserve area since I was very little. We need to keep the desert a desert, our native animals
are continually being forced to co habitate with humans and it’s not going welk. Continue to give them their
space so that we can all live together without hostile interaction
I am concerned with the number of people packed into a small space. Not only would this increase traffic to an
unmanageable level but will ruin the desert in this area.
Page 550
We have enough housing in our area. Please keep the land open so that families can continue to enjoy our
Sonoran Preserve.
This zoning would be uncharacteristic of the Sonoran preserve and city park surrounding the site.
The preserve gives us hiking trails and allows everyone to enjoy the beauty of the Arizona desert and wildlife. It
would also dramatically decrease property values for the people voting for you to remain in office.
The Sonoran preserve is just that, a Preserve. It preserves many species of plants and wildlife that is indigenous
to the area. It is vitally important that we preserve this area for our children and their children.
We need to keep the open land and what makes our area great.
I love hiking in the preserve. Anyone who intends on building anywhere close to it needs to follow the rules.
Our desert is at risk. We need you to protect it by requiring the builder to do the right thing.
Preserve landscape, Mountain View’s, prevent traffic
With so much growth in Arizona & Phoenix in particular, it is vital to retain the open spaces for all residents to
use and enjoy ‐ there was great foresight when determining preserves and buffered lands around them. The
roads ‐ current and even proposed new ones ‐ won’t be able to safely support the sudden surge of vehicles and
will most definitely increase the traffic volume and many drivers, bikers and pedestrians will experience a
greater risk of accidents. Please listen to the residents in the area that will be most impacted. Thank you.
This land is important to keep more open than crowded!
I have lived in this area for twenty years and it is getting so crowded and overbuilt. We must preserve open
outdoor space for people to enjoy the peace of the desert and recreation areas that are our Arizona treasures
Aaron Cushner
the Desert Character Overlay District safeguards were put in place to keep this specific and unique area from
overdevelopment and should not be overturned due to developer greed.
To prevent additional congestion and traffic and to preserve the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve.
I know that growth in our area needs to happen but it shouldn’t be so much that it take away from the Preserve
and the reasons we moved here.
It's wrong to ignore our Desert Character Overlay District! We bought our home here because of these
protections, and we love our desert! Thank you!
Will Ruin the wildlife and nature surrounding the preserve in addition to increasing the already challenging
traffic issues on Sonoran desert drive
Uniquely beautiful desert must be protected. Overly dense housing not consistent with that preservation.
Living in Desert Vistas subdivision since it's existence 15yrs ago has been an absolute blessing and we expect to
keep it that way. With that, we enjoy hiking, biking and walking frequently all year around. Over time the
"preserve" area has seen a HUGE increase in vehicles, accidents, speeding, crime, pollution & noise to name just
a few. Our understanding has always been that no further housing/development of any kind would continue
past our subdivision into the Sonoran Preserve. That certainly did not happen. Sonoran Desert Drive is so busy
NOW that adding additional housing will not only threaten people but the natural terrain and wildlife habitat.
That's a resounding NO WAY!
I hike and trail run in the preserve at least five times a week since I live within walking distance to the Vista
trailhead. It is a beautiful and relaxing and meditative time for me believe it should be left as is like, as I
understand the story, the original owner wanted it to stay, which I agree with.
Becasue we hike the trails regularly and the feeling of being lost in nature so close to home is special. It should
be protected and I hope my daughter can enjoy it the same way one day.
We moved here from Wisconsin almost 4 years ago. 100% the reason we selected to live up here in the North
valley was because of the Sonoran preserve. We chose to not be inside the 101 on purpose.please don't allow
the Sonoran desert drive and beautiful desert around it to be taken over with cars and traffic.
Page 551
Cycling and hiking in the area
Since living in Phoenix this has been a place where I can get away to escape the noise of the city. Please don’t
take that away from us. For a lot of people, having a place to get away to is vital to every day life.
We need to preserve the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve.
Arizona is growing too rapidly for its own good. The demand for water is only going to increase with these
unnecessary expansions. Destroying the natural habitats of the wildlife that surrounds is also harmful to the
already damaged ecosystem. There is no necessity to continue to tear up the desert to accommodate an exodus
of out of state buyers. They can find a more sustainable environment to live, Arizona is already overly populated
and adding excessive traffic flow to an underdeveloped part of the city is asinine. Keep Arizona wild.
I live less then a mile away and it’s a beautiful area that should remain the way it is. We hike, bike, and drive to
grandparents house on this beautiful road/preserve. Please let it stay beautiful and let us continue to make
memories here.
We moved up to this area because of the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve. Please keep our beautiful land the
way it is.
As someone who regularly drives, hikes, and bikes this area, it’s important to me, my family, my community,
and Phoenix at large to protect these kind of “open/brown/green spaces”. There are plenty of places around
Phoenix for development ‐ the Sonoran Preserve should not be one of them.
Maintain the beauty and areas to hike.
I run and cycle on the parkway and traffic is already dangerous, especially near the passing zones. I also hike
extensively and if many more houses are built, the views will become less spectacular than they are now. In
addition, wildlife would be affected by overdevelopment
I and my family moved to this area to enjoy the preserve. While we understand there is growth in the area, it
was done under the rules and regulations set forth. I would ask that all builders comply.
We use the preserve for hiking and horseback riding. Heavy traffic volume can create a hazard for horses, even
at a distance.
I travel Sonoran Desert Drive every day because I live right off of it. It is a beautiful drive, but also one that is
very serene and peaceful. I am concerned that allowing the Verdin community to be built at the requested
density it will cause a great impact and stress to the drive through the Preserve. Even if the road is expanded to
more lanes, this road will become a dangerous route for the bikers and hikers in the area, not to mention the
drivers. Please do not allow the density for this new community as requested!
1. There has been poor oversight with planning roadways to keep up with the existing development in the
Sonoran area. 2. Sonoran Desert Drive is supposed to be a scenic drive and is utilized by many cyclists and has a
gorgeous walking path. The increase win traffic will be a further danger to cyclists and pedestrians. 3. Many of
us have to keep moving further and further out of the city to get away from all the Phoenix traffic and live in a
peaceful community. The existing planning with the “water project” has been a nightmare with construction and
took 8 months to complete. We already have problems with adequate water in our area and other areas of
Phoenix area under water restrictions. Where is all the water going to come from to support all of these houses.
5. Schools are already overcrowded and there is already a problem with staffing for school buses and teachers.
How are we going to support an increase of additional kids and families when we cannot support the ones
already living here adequately?
I love being able to enjoy the beautiful preserve without all the traffic. The preserve is what makes city living do‐
Page 552
I have lived at this address for 20 years and have watched the area grow. My wife and I have hiked and biked in
the Sonoran Preserve area hundreds of times, and now we have introduced our children to a love of nature
through seeing Olive the owl on Hawk's Nest Trail and wildflower blooms biking along the Apache Wash trail. In
the middle of a growing city, this Preserve is an oasis that allows residents from near and far to relax and escape
the pace of city life. It magically transports visitors to a place that feels quiet and free. Please help us preserve
this for us and future visitors!
Traffic, keep the beautiful desert, water resources
The infrastructure is not setup for a development of this size and the tax payers shouldn’t bear the cost to
We have 2 parks there, we need to connect these parks. People live here for the openness of the land. We need
more open spaces, not more house's.
Please preserve this pristine piece of Sonoran Desert for the native flora and fauna and for our future
My family lives in Sonoran Foothills. We chose this beautiful area because of the gorgeous desert preserve. We
love our out of the way pocket and want to protect the gorgeous pristine desert from further development.
I live in the neighborhood and don’t want them to change our desert look it’s very important
The development will increase the footprint traffic and damage to these natural areas and habits. We must look
forward to responsible growth in unity with our surroundings and not just perceived revenues.
I am an avid hiker. I enjoy being able to see nature, plants and animals. We are already taking so much natural
habitat from desert life. Overcrowding the preserve area increases pollution by humans and their machines.
Furthermore, light and noise pollution create additional issues. Please conserve our preserve.
As local residents, my family loves to hike at the Apache wash trailhead and the trails behind Sonoran
foothills/Fireside. My family’s Christmas pictures have been taken in the surrounding desert for years. All the
surrounding neighbors have the desert overlay, which is more important than ever with the water shortage in
Phoenix. If you plant the appropriate trees, cactus etc., NO WATER IRRIGATION is needed. Our trees were
watered deep for the first two years, then turned off. 15 years after NO WATER, beautiful and thriving. You have
my address, drive on by. PLEASE keep the beautiful desert overlay our Sonoran Preserve deserves.
I live on the South‐West edge of the Sonoran Preserve. I am an avid outdoors person that loves the wild flora
and fauna and am concerned about destroying the natural beauty of the preserve as well as the natural habitat
of wild life. I believe that we need to prevent this oasis for recreation and wild life refuge to be altered.
I moved to this house 10 years ago to move out of the “city” and be near desert‐stop building so much up here!
We cannot keep moving the wild habitat out of their homes! Moving into this community we were told this
reserve was here to stay so we would never have to worry about build going up on it ‐ clearly, that has changed.
Do not let greed destroy our quality of life.
This is a beautiful scenic preserve that has already experienced housing growth, wild fires caused by humans,
and an increase in traffic. We have lived in this area for 15 years and specifically love that it used to be quiet and
just outside of the city. No thank you to further developments! Preserve the land, wildlife, and natural growth!
Love the beauty that this area brings to all.
I've lived on the north side of town my entire life and thr natural desert is why I continue to live away from the
noisy city. The Sonoran preserve has protection in place to conserve the natural environment and this
development is threatening that protection for the sake of the American dollar. We live up here for the wide
open space, peace and quiet, uninterrupted views and opportunity to enjoy nature. The traffic that's started to
grow is threatening this with speeders flying by at 70+MPH, endangering bikers, walkers and nature. Please do
now allow for more development than this preserve can handle and do not threaten the natural ecosystem by
We back up to Dove Valley.....the traffic has already increased exponentially over the past few years and people
use this road as a freeway....safety for our kids and everyone in our community is a huge concern.
Page 553
I live in the Sonoran desert north of Phoenix, Don’t want it destroyed by continuing building. Leave it in it’s
natural state, so we can enjoy the desert for generations please .
I live on Dove Valley and the traffic is already horrendous. We also love driving "the back way" when we're
headed to Scottsdale for the scenic route. We would hate to see that go and hate for it to be filled with more
homes than are currently allowed (none would be the perfect amount in my opinion). The schools are already
far too filled for the existing amount of homes and the roads were not built for the amount of traffic that
currently passes through on a daily basis. There are so many reasons to not allow more homes!! We moved up
here to be away from the millions that live in metro and we'd like to keep it that way.
I enjoy hiking and biking in the area. Houses and cars really ruin the beauty of it.
Please do not overcrowd our area and stress our resources. Sonoran Desert Drive is beautiful and offers
wonderful opportunity to be outside and healthy. Please preserve this area.
Me and my family and friends are all avid trail runners with great respect for our wildlife and natural
ecosystems. I don’t dispute the need for housing but the Desert Character Overlay District put the standards in
place for exactly this reason ‐ to prevent developers from overdevelopment that would ruin the NATURAL
ecosystem. I applaud them for some of the measures they propose in planning but that will never make up for
any zoning change and quite frankly is hypocritical. Please make sure Verdin complies with the current standard
I will not vote for an elected official that allows this to happen
This area is important to us as we hike and bike. Knowing that preserve will always be here made buying our
home easy. We would like for all development to mind and take care of our desert spaces. There is a reason
the Desert Character Overlay District was created. To ignore this would be a tragedy.
Too much traffic. Dangerous to have additional traffic where lots of bikers use the bike path. Why not build on
the other side of 17 instead of near the preserve. Help of wildlife not be pushed out even more.
Taking away the sceneries wildlife and open park trails to enjoy. Once you start building gets crowded needing
more wider roads taking away from the above
Safe and beautiful area to hike and bike.
As a local real estate agent, I understand the need for more housing in the metro area. But there are many
other locations that are not in the middle of a preserve. Outdoor recreation and the beauty of the Sonoran
Desert are reasons why people relocate to the area or purchase vacation homes. Having the preserve remain a
preserve and not another housing project is vital to our community.
Being surrounded by the Sonoran Desert Preserve is probably the biggest reason that we built the house that
we live in now. It is just so beautiful to be able to drive home after a long day's work and enjoy God's creation at
it's finest. It is truly breathtaking and spectacular. Many people flock to Apache Wash Trailhead recreational
area to enjoy this beautiful natural setting through hiking and mountain biking. It would be a travesty to
overpopulate this area and ruin the enjoyment of the preserve for generations to come. It just wouldn't be the
same. Not to mention the destruction of the natural habitat of so many desert creatures that make the preserve
their home. I witness this first hand while living in the Sonoran Gate Community. These animals do not deserve
to be displaced and have their homes destroyed. The line has to be drawn somewhere in order to maintain a
level of natural beauty in our urban areas. This seems like as good a time as any to make a conscious decision to
halt the human encroachment on the habitat of all of God's innocent creatures and keep this little slice of
My family and I love to hike this area, especially to feel like we’re away from city life and enjoying the natural
outdoors. That is one of the reasons why we chose to live in this area was because of the preserve.
We moved up to this area to enjoy the beauty and tranquility of the area. Now it is being threatened. We
moved up to this area to see our beautiful dessert in its natural habit, and now it's being threatened. We moved
up here because it was a great dream come true, and now that dream is again being threatened by those
wishing to make many dollars off the land and environment that belongs to us all. Please, please let's stop this
travesty. Thanks for reading my input. We just so love it up here and hope for no more growth and
Keep population down to preserve the wildlife
Page 554
This road is a quick north valley traffic bypass that remains somewhat traffic free for now. There is great hiking
and desert views. For profit expansion in this area would destroy that.
We specifically moved to this area b/c of the preserve and the peacefulness that it brings to our lives and
neighborhood. District guidelines are in place for a reason and should not be adjusted for a greedy developer.
I think the peace and quiet and a safe place for the Sonoran wildlife to roam freely is vital. We cannot keep
pushing these animals out of there natural habitats. Traffic on Sonoran desert drive has already increased and
to increase it more is simply careless as families riding bikes will be at an increased risk
The Sonoran Preserve is beautiful Natural landscape that keeps the heat down vs concrete, provides
opportunities for walking, hiking, biking ect. Many of the residents in this area including myself moved up here
due to these walking and hiking trails. Also, the traffic on Sonoran Desert drive is already bad and adding more
homes will only make it worse. Please listen to the residents and save the Sonoran Preserve.
The drive along Sonoran Desert Drive is very relaxing and calming. I enjoy hiking and I would like it to remain a
desert oasis to enjoy.
Would cause an overpopulated area that is meant to be preserved for nature. Would ruin hiking and biking do
to the amount of traffic and would become dangerous. Would effect the views and the ability for people enjoy
the scenery. Would also effect the wildlife pushing the coyotes and javelinas into residential areas. Which they
belong in the desert.
Beauty of the natural desert provides peace & tranquility in this world of unrest. Don’t destroy the zen
My family and I enjoy biking and hiking in that area, which is part of the reason we live where we do. We believe
the City of Phoenix made a informed and important decision to maintain the wilderness, beauty and safety of
that area for a reason and would hate to see that decision overturned.
Hiking and the overall access to the outdoors
It is one of the most beautiful areas of the valley. Please dont spoil it.
The Sonoran Desert Drive is a beautiful natural area that needs to be preserved for future generations. There
are plenty of other places to develop closer to the I‐17
We live in this area for its natural beauty and we do not want to lose that.
I bought the house for privacy and quietness. The sound from the cars already are a issue, the amount of
roadkill is brutal and water shortages have began. Taylor morrison has so many issues with the houses in
Sonoran gate , they are not prepared for this project. Pollution and traffic is just not right in this area. Why
wouldn't they build on the area on cave creek road. It's open, houses have no issues. This seems the state is
taking money to push this project through. Who's paying for the roads and why would you put a road up by the
state hiking trails. This ruins the landscape !
Please adhere to the Desert Character Overlay District safeguards. We need space to walk, bike, play and enjoy
the natural beauty of the desert.
I feel that they are over building in Phoenix. Have limited water supply. The traffic is already congested and
difficult to around.
I love where I live and the traffic is manageable. The mountains and hiking trails are beautiful and right now
there’s congestion when I hike with bicyclists and hikers. More people would make hiking and the outdoors
troublesome for parking and just hiking the trails.
I grew up in cave creek which is right on the other side and I know the value to this desert landscape and the
peace it brings to others. It’s natures playground let it be
Preserving the open space, flora, and fauna native to the area
The natural desert is one of the most unique places and somehow we have to realize it is something we cannot
afford to destroy. I understand the need for homes and such, but please leave this area be. Please!
Keep the desert the desert and keeping it natural where I bike and hike
Page 555
I love driving on the Sonora Desert Dr. and seeing our beautiful desert. I and my family members also enjoy
hiking and biking on the trails.
Keep the beauty and peacefulness of this special area. Protect wilderness and cyclists. Cut down on traffic. It is a
rare beauty we cannot afford to lose.
My family and I hike at this preserve every week. I take friends to it, have had Girl Scout events, and even
volunteer to clean up the trails. It is one of the most gorgeous gems in Phoenix. In addition to that, numerous
animals call it their home. It is not ok to take that away from the people of Phoenix.
My family hikes and mountain bikes several times per week on these trails. We truly appreciate this land and
would not want its inhabitants to be disrupted any further than they already are.
I'm mainly just concerned with the increased amount of traffic new housing developments will create.
The development that is already out there detracts from the natural environment immensely. Additional
development will only make this worse. Build elsewhere...just not here please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The desert is slowly vanishing which breaks my heart. The Sonoran Preserve should be as it is titled “PRESERVE
This area can not support anymore homes. We don’t have the commercial needed. Also, we need to preserve
the desert. That is a popular scenic drive and hiking area.
It was designed to be protected. It is that simple. There is already too many cars going through that preserve.
Natural beauty
My family and I enjoy walking, hiking, and driving by the preserve and the planned Verdin development on a
daily basis. It is a highlight of our day and one of the only areas in Phoenix that people can enjoy the natural
beauty of the desert, because it maintains the desert character overlay. It would be very disheartening if this
beautiful surrounding area loses its desert character. I trust that members of the Phoenix city council will reject
the request to maintain the desert character overlay. Thank you.
The volume of traffic is already out of control on Sonoran Desert Drive. Please keep the Sonoran Preserve as it
Already getting too crowded in the area. And the desert preserve is in jeopardy.
It is a beautiful preserve that holds opportunity to connect with nature, and allow us all in the valley to have
natural habitat for wildlife and flora and fauna that are so important to keeping the integrity of our great state.
Concerned about too much growth and traffic. Moved up here in 2005 for the beautiful open Sonoran Desert.
Absolutely do not want to see that all developed ‐ we do not need anymore housing or apartments.
All of the building is already over done. It's taking away any part of the beauty left in the area. My family does
alot of biking and hiking in that area and it doesn't need to be ruined with more structures. Leave AZ alone and
stop overtaking anything left. The traffic is insane. Why do we need more of it in the area?! That drive is one of
the last drives left near by that is ALMOST untouched.
As a native of AZ, north Phoenix particularly, I’ve seen the increase in population boom over the last 20 years.
The traffic, noise, crowds are destroying the natural beauty and peacefulness of N Phx. Also… the water! Where
will all the water come from to sustain such a population? We don’t want to end up like Anthem!!
Beautiful hiking area and bike riding.
Beauty, Congestion, MTB trails
Being able to walk , enjoying the beautiful landscape the LORD make.
Congestion. Rezoning opens doors to more rezoning. Will cost the county money to widen roads. And I like less
people around.
Destroying the beauty and traffic concerns.
Destroying the beauty, and traffic concerns.
Greg Laursen
I am concerned about the increase in traffic on Sonoran Desert Drive and Dove Valley roads. I would like to see
this portion of the desert remain protected.
Page 556
I am concerned about the volume of cars, traffic and safety. There have already been fatal accidents for
motorists and bicyclists on that road/area. I am concerned about ruining the integrity of the beautiful Sonoran
Preserve. PLEASE don’t let this happen!!
I am extremely concerned about over building at the expense of the natural desert. Loss of natural
settings/habitat, increased traffic, speeding, congestion, crime, burglary, all the issues that come with high
I am signing this petition for multiple reasons ‐ we do not have the proper roadways to support additional
housing units and want to preserve the beauty of the region
I believe it is vital to preserve the Sonoran desert lands. The more we build the more we push wild life out of
their habitats and into neighborhoods where they inevitably will get injured or killed. If we keep building on
these lands we won't be the Sonoran desert anymore, we will just have to explain to our grandkids what the
Sonoran desert once looked like.
I do not want the massive increase in traffic it is already horrible in this area. We do not need more housing
there are plenty already being built.
I don’t want to see traffic increase. I would like to see the desert stay peaceful and empty.
I enjoy taking hikes with my family and dog. It is so wonderful to get out of the city and neighborhood to
experience nature. We also enjoy taking our bikes along the Sonoran Desert Drive to safely ride without traffic
and congestion. I do not want to lose this ability to development. There are so many other areas available for
development without jeopardizing the beauty that is preserved in this area.
I frequent the Sonoran Preserve 2‐3 times a week and my husband road bikes 4‐5 times a week in the bike
lanes. We enjoy being able to go enjoy the desert without having to see home after home. We are also in a
drought and putting more homes up does not help address the issue. Please think about keeping more open
spaces for everyone to enjoy who already lives here it is getting crowded enough.
I go hiking there to appreciate the natural beauty of the Sonoran desert and the breathtaking views of the
McDowell Mountains and Boulders of Carefree etc.One if the last pristine places to go up here in the N Valley .I
do not want more housing subdivisions and apartment buildings obstructing the views along with more traffic
congestion coming from the constant relentless overbuilding of housing presently occurring .Please save this
beautiful,natural corridor which is used for hiking and biking along with the equestrian trails for horseback
riding.Please allow local residents a sacred piece of land to cherish for us now as well as the generations to
come ,we need somewhere to go that we can take pride in .The Natural beauty of our desert lands is what drew
me to the area 42 years ago please Preserve it!!
I have lived in this area for 17 yrs. and we are raising our daughters here. My family enjoys the trails and hiking. I
am also a teacher at on of the neighborhood K‐8 schools. Our school is busting at the seams even before all the
new construction being completed. You can't keep overloading the schools and roads to crisis points.
I hike the preserve almost every day, year round. Exponential increases in large commercial trucks and
unforced city and state (ARS 28‐955) traffic laws related to excessive noise ruin the wild experience of North
Phoenix' best attraction. When the city pushed Dove Valley Road through the desert 10 years ago, I was a
member of the Sonoran Citizens Improvement Association. At Phoenix City Council meetings I brought up the
noise issue and stated that the city will never enforce the noise statutes on the books, because the police were
over worked and had more important issues ton deal with. An that was 10 years ago before the defend the
police movement decimated law enforcement moral. 10 years ago, City Council told me not to worry, noise
issues would be addressed. I knew it wasn't true a decade ago. And I have sadly been proven right. The city
needs to finish the Sonoran Desert Drive extension off the 303 as per MAG and the city's (so far) empty
promises from a decade ago. I have a long memory. And I vote. https://sonorancitizens.wordpress.com/
I like living in the city with a place to go(the preserve) where you feel like the city is so far away. I hike, mountain
bike and enjoy seeing the wildlife as well as nature in general.
I live in the area and my family and I walk, bike, and hike in the preserve daily. I also see all the animals who live
in and rely on the preserve.
Page 557
I love all the preserved open desert. If there are rules and guidelines already established for a certain amount of
homes built, we need to stay within that, and stop over building whenever a builder wants to cram more homes
I moved here because of the nature. I grew up in the country and this was as close to it as I could get. I love the
nature and the quiet that we all paid premium dollar for as well
I moved here to get away from the high volume of homes and traffic in Gilbert and to enjoy the beautiful
surrounding desert trails and nature paths north and south of Sonoran Desert / Dove Valley.
I often go hiking in the preserve for the peacefulness, seeing wildlife, and being surrounded by nature. I bike ride
along Sonoran desert drive and feel safe due to very little traffic. I will be devastated if homes get built on our
beautiful preserve. Animals will suffer, people will suffer, and preserve plant life will be killed. This should not
happen. Preserve means preserve!
I purchased my home in Sonoran Foothills in 2010 primarily because of the desert character overlay and how
the neighborhood blends in with the natural surroundings. I moved to this area because of the desert character
and would like it to stay that way as it expands.
I spend a great deal of time hiking and biking there. The north valley is quickly being developed and it would be
nice to at least have this area remain what it was intended to be…a preserve. Thank you
I understand that growth is inevitable, but we need to be smart about it. There needs to be a balance of large
homes, apartments, and smaller homes. There have been hundreds of apartment spaces built west of this area
and the increase in traffic has been considerable in the past 5 years. I urge the council to consider keeping this
balance on the north end of the city.
I use the area all the time for hike, bike and great out doors
I use the area weekly running and hiking. It is a beautiful diverse area with wildlife and plant life. Also concerning
is water shortages. The area needs to be preserved.
I use this area for cycling and running. Additional congestion will make it unsafe for these activities. We are
losing more and more areas where it is safe for recreation. The preserve provides safe space for recreation and
adds value in its current state to the residents of the Phoenix metro area.
I very much enjoy the drive through there. Traffic has already increased too much as it is.
I want to continue enjoying walking and biking along the Sonora Desert preserve in a pleasant and safe way.
I want to keep it as is so that we all can enjoy the area and keep the daily traffic down.
I wish to preserve the Sonara Preserve as it is and prevent the reckless encroachment by developers to rob the
community of this precious resource we all enjoy.
I would like to preserve what we have in our area and community!!
I'm mountain bike in the Sonoran preserve 3 to 4 times per week and feel it is vitally important to keep some
space set aside with minimal traffic and housing.
It is a beautiful community! I love seeing people rude their bikes, walk, hike, ride atvs so close by but with more
housing it becomes impossible to enjoy the preserve. Save the last piece of Arizona the beautiful desert and wild
life in Phoenix!
It is important that we preserve our land to make it available to enjoy the outside life without the traffic.
It is my training ground. I spend countless hours a week there riding in the bike lane, running on designated
sidewalks & trails. It is regarded, by local athletes, as a safe stretch of road to cycle on due to the generous bike
lane and limited traffic entering/exiting Sonoran Desert Dr.
It’s nature. Beautiful parts of the valley have already been ruined by housing projects. This shouldn’t be another
I've lived in this area for the last 3+ years and a major reason we moved here is because of the desert setting
and because it didn't feel as crowded as other parts of the Valley. Sad to see our beautiful preserve turned into
crappy track homes.
Keep the beauty of the desert and keep traffic minimal on Sonoran Desert Drive as there are no crossroads to
take as an alternate route if traffic is heavy on Sonoran Desert Drive.
Keep the desert!!! One of the reasons why I love where I live is the Sonoran preserve!!!!
Page 558
Keeping natural habitats for the animals that belong here. We are on their land and need to be cognizant of
that. Also, future generations need to be able to enjoy nature as it is meant to be.
Keeping the natural desert habitat is better for the environment.
Leave the desert un touched
Living in the area I regularly hike and bike in the preserve with my family and do not want to see it get overrun
with more housing developments. Additionally Dove Valley is already very congested, I want to preserve our
desert, Phoenix in general has a water issue, and most importantly the schools in this area are already over
My family and I value the Sonoran Preserve and open desert. We've lived next to and used the Sonoran
Preserve for over 15 years. We mountain bike, run, hike, and enjoy nature on these trails multiple times per
week. The surrounding open desert is an integral element contributing to the peace of the Preserve. We were
dismayed at the building of the neighborhood off Dove Valley Rd between the two sections of the Preserve a
few years ago. Please do not crowd the area surrounding and within the beautiful Preserve!
Original safeguards put in place by longtime developers who created the Preserve and associated housing
(Sunbelt Construction). They balanced the housing needs with need to create liveable areas that honored the
fragile desert. This request for increased density is about money and is unnecessary for a profitable develoment
effort. Everyone needs to get paid for their work, including developers, but respect for the fragile ecosystem
and desired lifestyle in the north valley is also required. Profits are fine and were factored into the original deal.
People already speed like crazy on this road and I'm afraid accidents will go up
Please don’t let greedy developers have their way!
Please preserve the natural beauty of the Sonoran Desert. It is irreplaceable!! The proposed excessive
development will permanently destroy the beauty of this desert!!
Please stop encouraging overgrowth. We do not have sufficient resources for the population growth. Let the
desert live. There should not be such things as zoning changes that crowd people and houses into areas to allow
developers to make money and walk away.
Please! We must protect our desert land. For the animals, the plantation, the beauty.
Preserve‐ should be just that preserve. Preserve the natural Sonoran desert as much as possible. This
development would not only take away so much of our desert beauty but also the wildlife habitats & wildlife
would be greatly affected.
Preserving more of the natural landscape is important. The Apache wash recreation area is a beautiful way to
experience nature and enjoy the area. More homes bring more cars and traffic and noise pollution, disturbing
the natural habitat. There are so few places left to enjoy nature and leave it beautiful. We don’t need more
homes there.
Preserving natural areas and wildlife
Proposed area would block the migration of wildlife through the preserve which is likely its originally intended
purpose. Also, there is not enough water already….
Sara Rovarino
Save the preserve
That is a protected place that we need to take care as part of our lungs we need good air, we have so many
houses, why we need to destroy the habitat of a lot of animals.
The beauty of living in Phoenix is having the ability to have open spaces for not only the wildlife but also the
citizens to use the land the way it was intended. There are plenty of other places to build and expand without
overcrowding the desert areas.
The city of Phoenix is running out of desert space because of so many large communities. Taking away the
beautiful desert or desert character overlay to add more concrete and asphalt among houses is deeply
concerning for Phoenicians, tourists, and the wildlife in the area.
The drive through the preserve is truly a beautiful drive. With more houses comes more traffic which will take
away from the beauty and wildlife of the preserve. It is called a preserve for a reason.
Page 559
The entire N Phoenix area cannot accommodate this influx of new homes without increasing law enforcement
and fixing the road grid. The city needs to be proactive, not reactive.
The natural landscape of the Sonoran Desert must be preserved so that all may enjoy its true beauty and the
rewards of living in the desert. It takes courage and decisive action to prioritize the natural land over
development yet it is a gift you provide to countless generations. Protecting the preserve is action toward a
meaningful legacy. Please honor the desert preserve and say no to more development in this rare and special
area of Phoenix. With hope and gratitude, Krystal Mazzola Wood
The open space is becoming g increasingly scarce, reducing not only the lands for recreation but also the
The Sonoran desert preserve is admired for its standing beauty. Arizona is Home to tons of desert land scenery
that makes our cave creek town so special. Please preserve this land and build soemewhere else
The Sonoran Preserve is truly the most incredible place to hike, bike, and just enjoy the beautiful desert. Just
driving through brings my family so much peace. For it to be surrounded by dense development and traffic
would steal the joy it brings from to the whole community, as well as visitors who are lucky enough to see some
of our most spectacular views.
There has already been enough building along Dove Valley/Sonoran Desert Drive. Please leave the preserve so
that we can continue to enjoy its beauty.
There have been to many accidents and deaths.
This area is vital for wildlife and preserving the bike trails be able to trail ride in the unspoiled desert we don’t
need anymore traffic thru here it would completely ruin the whole area
This desert area is beautiful and with more and more houses being built, this will reduce the amount of natural
preserve we have to enjoy. I love to hike in this area.
This is a great place to hike and enjoy the beautiful desert landscape. The city planners and council are ruining
the desert plus there is no thought of water shortage when these zoning changes are made.
This is a safe place to bike and hike. The balloons are beautiful to watch there. Let’s keep the open space
This is an important area to keep Phoenix as special as it is. In addition, the growing drought crisis makes the
option of further building less eco friendly.
This pristine desert area should not be developed, it needs to be PROTECTED.
This proposed change in zoning will allow new development that will infringe on our recreational area. Zoning is
there for a reason. Please do not change it.
This stretch of road is the safest and most beautiful stretches of uninterrupted roads for cycling in the valley.
Please save it
To be able to get out of the city and experience the peacefulness and beauty of the Sonoran desert so easily is
what makes this area unique. Once it is gone it is gone.
To destroy nature in order to build more homes is wrong. We are speaking for all the animals that currently call
the Sonoran Preserve home.
To preserve the beauty and conservation of the area, as well as safety for cyclist and hikers.
Traffic along Sonoran Desert Drive and Dove Valley is already becoming a major problem. Increased traffic will
make for a dangerous situation for cyclists riding in the bike lanes. Also, the increased density of homes directly
against the road will affect the desert nature of the area.
Upon moving to my home in Sonoran Commons I was told all this state land would stay undeveloped. That was
a key factor in purchasing my home because I love the drive, but most importantly Hiking and biking. It was very
disappointing when the Taylor Morrison community built where I was told no homes would be and increasing
more homes and traffic would be disappointing not to mention destroy the sonoran desert further. Please do
not allow this to happen!
Walking along the Sonora preserve desert in a safe manner is very important for my kids
Page 560
We are homeowners in Tatum Highlands and use the beautiful Sonoran Desert Drive to get to one of our
favorite hiking areas, Apache Wash Trail. It is vitally important both ecologically and aesthetically to maintain
the Desert Overlay Plan to keep this remarkable Arizona treasure intact with low density, one story, blended
into the environment, natural colors, and with great respect of the surrounding preserve. The developer’s
existing project just to the west on Sonoran Desert Drive is an example of the opposite of this‐ homes close
together, no subtle and natural build character, no boundaries between homes, no blending with the Sonoran
Desert landscape. Sticks out while on the drive or hiking the Preserve rather than disappearing/tastefully
blending in. This is very concerning and must not be duplicated in any way. Please retain the existing Desert
Overlay Plan to maintain the incredible Sonoran Preserve. Thank you Councilman Waring and all city council
members. Respectfully submitted, Laurie Foster
We are loosing preserve land left and right. We need to keep the preserve the way it is. Plus not to mention all
the traffic and extra water for all these new builds.
We are loosing the beauty that was one of the huge reasons for moving where we live. All you are you doing is
bringing more infrastructure. I understand that growth needs to take place but I think that it should be done in a
much better way. Putting up a bunch of houses on top of each other is not the solution. I see greed takes the
upper hand over more intelligent decisions. Thank you
We chose this part of Phoenix when we moved from out of state because of the open desert and what that
offered, little traffic, and less people in general. In just 4 short years we are seeing things change for the
negative…reminding us of overdevelopment we experienced in the East San Francisco Bay Area.
Overdevelopment that led to traffic issues and overcrowded schools, just to name a couple problems. We don’t
want to see these same mistakes take place in our new home. And we don’t want to lose the beautiful open
We have a young family and love to hike which is why we moved to this area. If we don’t stop this, it will
destroy the area and wildlife.
We have already encroached & displaced our very important desert wildlife, my hope is to prevent further
destruction of our desert ecosystem. I enjoy hiking, less pollution, nature and safety within our preserve. Please
keep it that way.
We have so few Desert Lands left for generations to appreciate
We hike and drive through here for mental health. Please don’t fill more desert preserves with homes and
commercial property.
We love the natural area of Sonoran Preserve! Adding more homes is going to take away the beauty of this land.
We cannot allow new developments to destroy our desert.
We moved here to not be so close to continued urbanization. We utilize the preserves regularly for hiking,
biking, and running.
We moved to this area because of the beauty of the preserve and the desert areas around us. The area is
already congested with traffic and adding more subdivisions will just clog our streets, increase pollution,
displace animals and ruin the desert. Please do not let that happen.
We must preserve the natural beauty of Arizona. The generations to come deserve to see the natural beauty
that we have today. It is also home to many of Gods creatures and sustains their lives.
We need to have open space to enjoy hikes, trails, horizon visibility. We do not want the Preserve to turn into a
asphalt map.
We need to stop doing things for the sake of the bottom line. We have destroyed enough of our natural
environment for the sake of exploitation, and disregarding something that has been set in place creates a
precedent for this to continue arbitrarily. People move their families to areas like this because of the
environment around them. If we wanted to live in the middle of the city, we would live in the middle of the city.
Allowing this to continue will greatly reduce and diminish the purpose & meaning of preserved & protected
land, as well as the ability by which we are able to enjoy it in it’s natural form ‐ mitigating the full purpose
Page 561
We truly need to preserve our Sonoran Desert and we need to maintain the original reason this area has been
preserved. We are rapidly losing our Sonoran Desert and our recreation areas, not to mention our wildlife are
losing their homes. We can’t be nothing but concrete. We should take pride in living in a beautiful part of town.
Please Preserve!!
we use it weekly for hiking and dog walking please please don't ruin this!
We want to preserve the natural beauty and opportunities we have now to bike, hike and pleasant walking with
families and friends while enjoying the beauty of our Sonoran Desert. So please don’t grant permission to build
more housing communities.
When does this stop? We have a responsibility to our next generation of children to save our desert for them to
enjoy. Take the building elsewhere. PRESERVE what is left of our precious desert
Would like this preserved with desert lands as much as possible
Page 562
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
the Desert Character Overlay District - Ordinance Adoption - Z-TA-5-18-2
(Ordinance G-6993)
Request for a public hearing for a proposed text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance,
Text Amendment Z-TA-5-18-2, to amend Chapter 6, Section 653 to modify the Desert
Character Overlay District boundaries between the 16th Street and 32nd Street
alignments.This is a companion case to GPA-DSTV -1-18-2, Z-75-18-2 and Z-62-18-2
and should be heard after Z-75-18-2.
Summary
The intent of this proposed text amendment is amend Chapter 6, Section 653 of the
Zoning Ordinance to modify the boundaries of the Desert Character Overlay District.
Applicant: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Representative: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff recommendation: Approval, as shown in Exhibit A of the Staff Report.
VPC Info: The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case on Nov. 6,
2018, April 2, 2019, and Dec. 7, 2021, for information only. The North Gateway Village
Planning Committee heard this case on Nov. 8, 2018 and Dec. 9, 2021, for information
only.
VPC Action: The North Gateway Village Planning Committee heard this case on March
10, 2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 4-1.
The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case on April 5, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 7-4.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard the case on May 5, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Addendum A Staff Report, by a vote of 7-1.
Location
Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD) boundaries between the 16th Street and
32nd Street alignments
Council District: 2
Parcel Address: 28239 N. 23rd St.
Page 563
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 564
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE CODE OF THE
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA, PART II, CHAPTER 41, THE
ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX BY AMENDING
CHAPTER 6, SECTIONS 653.A. (GENERAL PURPOSE OF
DESERT CHARACTER OVERLAY DISTRICTS) AND 653.B.2.
(DESERT MAINTENANCE OVERLAY (SUB-DISTRICTS A AND B),
APPLICABILITY) TO MODIFY THE BOUNDARIES OF THE
DESERT CHARACTER OVERLAY DISTRICT.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
That Chapter 6, Sections 653.A. (General Purpose of Desert Character
Overlay Districts) and 653.B.2. (Desert Maintenance Overlay (Sub-Districts A and B),
Applicability), is amended to modify the boundaries of the Desert Character Overlay
District as follows:
SECTION 1. That Chapter 6, Section 653.A. (General Purpose of Desert
Character Overlay Districts) is amended to replace Figure A and read as follows:
A. General Purpose of Desert Character Overlay Districts. The purpose of the
Desert Character Overlay Districts is to implement the north land use plan, to
define the nature of development while maintaining undisturbed areas, and to
provide guidance for new development to occur within the context of the fragile
undisturbed desert. The Desert Maintenance, Rural Desert and Suburban Desert
Overlay Districts are designed in response to existing undisturbed conditions and
pressures placed on them by increased development. The key to successful
development within the three districts, which maintain interconnected undisturbed
desert and washes, lies in analysis of individual subdivision sites before laying out
the design of streets and lots.
Page 565
The Desert Maintenance Overlay District is divided into Subdistricts A and B,. as
illustrated on Figure A. in order to address specific requirements of this area.
Subdistrict A includes approximately one mile on both sides of the Cave Creek
Wash and includes the area along the wash, that is not part of any Parks,
Recreation and Library Department managed open space, such as the a Sonoran
Preserve. With the many washes to be maintained in an undisturbed condition
crossing this area, Subdistrict A is intended to provide a transition from the
preserve to areas with greater density. A very low density, scale and intensity of
residential development characterize this area. The Desert Maintenance Overlay
Subdistrict A is the least intensive with regards to density allowed and the most
restrictive in order to maintain the fragile undisturbed areas and the wildlife corridor
along the Cave Creek Wash. Subdistrict B is characterized by low
density development which may be sited in clusters along with provision for an
area to allow access to the Cave Buttes Recreational Area. Through clustering of
development in this area the ability to maintain large connected undisturbed areas
and washes becomes possible.
***
Figure A: Desert Maintenance Character Districts
Page 566
SECTION 2. That Chapter 6, Section 653.B.2. (Desert Maintenance Overlay
(Sub-Districts A and B), Applicability) is amended to read as follows:
2. Applicability. The Desert Maintenance Overlay District applies to all land
within the area as depicted on the Desert Character District Map (Figure A).
More specifically, the Desert Maintenance Overlay Sub-District A applies to
all land within the area bounded by Carefree Highway on the north, the
Dynamite Boulevard alignment on the south, a line running parallel to the
Cave Creek Wash connecting the 24th Street alignment at Carefree
Highway to the 16th Street alignment at the Dynamite Boulevard alignment
along the west, and the west boundary of Dove Valley Ranch extending
south along the Black Mountain Parkway to Ashler Hills Drive and then
running parallel to the Cave Creek Wash to the 32nd Street alignment at the
Dynamite Boulevard alignment along the east.
Page 567
The Desert Maintenance Overlay Sub-District B applies to all land within the
area bounded by Sub-District A on the north, the Cave Buttes Recreation
Area along the south and west, and Cave Creek Road (excluding the
commercially designated parcel at the northwest corner of Cave Creek Road
and Dynamite Boulevard) together with the south and west boundary of the
Tatum Ranch Planned Community District (west of Cave Creek Road) and
Black Mountain Parkway along the east.
A site plan approved in accordance with Section 507 of the Zoning
Ordinance is required for all development, plus adherence to the design
guidelines and standards detailed below and in Section 507 Tab A of the
Zoning Ordinance.
***
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of June, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_____________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Page 568
Attachment B
Staff Report
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment
Z-TA-5-18-2
March 9, 2022
Application No. Z-TA-5-18-2: Amend Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance to modify
the boundaries of the Desert Character Overlay Districts.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Z-TA-5-18-2 as shown in
Exhibit A.
Purpose
The intent of this text amendment is to revise the applicability area and associated text
for the Desert Maintenance Overlay of the Desert Character Overlay Districts to align
with transportation corridor updates since the adoption of the overlay district.
The Desert Maintenance
Overlay District contains use
standards and district
regulations that are contained in
two subdistricts, Sub-District A
and Sub-District B. Sub-District
A applies to land approximately
one mile in each direction from
Cave Creek Wash, from
Carefree Highway on the north
to the Dynamite Road alignment
on the south. Sub-District B
applies to land east of Sub-
District A and generally extends
to Cave Creek Road. The
current boundaries of the
subdistricts are shown to the left,
in pink (Sub-District A) and blue
(Sub-District B).
Desert Maintenance Overlay District Sub-Areas,
Source: Hilgart Wilson
Page 569
Staff Report Z-TA-5-18-2
March 9, 2022
Page 2
The applicant’s proposed
modification would modify the
boundaries of both Sub-District A
and Sub-District B. Sub-District A
standards are proposed to be
removed from the property south
of Sonoran Desert Drive and west
of Cave Creek Wash. Land south
of Sonoran Desert Drive and east
of Cave Creek Wash, currently in
Sub-District A, would become a
part of Sub-District B. The area
impacted by this proposed
modification is shown to the left.
Staff is recommending a smaller
modification that would only
remove Sub-District A standards
from an approximately 155.06-acre
Applicant Proposed Desert Maintenance Overlay portion of the original request as
District Modifications, Source: Hilgart Wilson depicted on the left.
Minor text updates to the overlay
are also proposed to provide
consistency with the geographic
modifications of the subdistrict
areas.
There are three additional
concurrent requests. Rezoning
Case No. Z-75-18-2 is a
companion rezoning case to Z-TA-
5-18-2 and would modify the
boundary of the Desert Character
Overlay District on the city’s
Zoning Map for 155.06 acres.
General Plan Amendment Case
No. GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 and
Rezoning Case No. Z-62-18-2
encompass the Verdin site (488
acres). General Plan Amendment
Staff Recommended Desert Maintenance Overlay Case No. GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
District Modifications, Source: Hilgart Wilson
seeks to modify the land use map
Page 570
Staff Report Z-TA-5-18-2
March 9, 2022
Page 3
designation and removal from the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay. Rezoning Case No.
Z-62-18-2 proposes to rezone the property to a Planned Unit Development district.
Background: Desert Character Overlay Districts
The Desert Character Overlay Districts, Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance, was
established in 2001 via Text Amendment Case No. Z-TA-3-99 with a general purpose to
implement the North Land Use Plan. The intent of the overlay was to establish three
character districts; Desert Maintenance, Rural Desert and Suburban Desert, to define
the nature of development while maintaining undisturbed areas and to provide guidance
for new development. Standards for the Desert Maintenance Overlay District were
included in the original text amendment. Standards for the Rural Desert and Suburban
Desert Overlay Districts have not been established.
The overlay district contains distinct permitted uses and district standards for Sub-
Districts A and B in addition to design guidelines applicable to both subdistricts. Single-
family residential uses are permitted in both subdistricts, with attached dwelling units
only permitted in Sub-District B. Select commercial uses are permitted in Sub-District
B, subject to obtaining a Special Permit.
District standards for the subdistricts include provisions designed to address lot size,
building envelope, height, setbacks, access, native landscaping and treatment of
washes. Design guidelines contain additional guidance on site disturbance, native plant
preservation, building and wall design, and access to preserve areas, among others.
Background: Peripheral Areas C and D and North Land Use Plans
In 1987, Phoenix City Council adopted the Peripheral Areas C and D Plan as an
amendment to the General Plan. The intent of the Peripheral Areas C and D Plan was
to serve as a guide for future land use and development in the planning area, which
consisted of approximately 111 square miles of largely undeveloped land north of the
Central Arizona Project canal in North Phoenix. Within the Implementation Program
section of the Plan, further refinement of the general character elements was suggested
prior to any formal ordinance adoption.
The North Land Use Plan was adopted in 1996 to further the existing policies of the
Peripheral Areas C and D Plan. The Plan divided the planning area into three character
areas, Desert Preserve, Rural Desert and Suburban Residential, and suggested that
overlay districts be developed to provide clear development standards in line with
community desires. The Desert Preserve character area aligns with the area included
in the Desert Maintenance Overlay of the Desert Character Overlay Districts.
Page 571
Staff Report Z-TA-5-18-2
March 9, 2022
Page 4
North Land Use Plan Character Areas, Source: City of Phoenix
Background: Verdin Planned Unit Development (PUD) Proposal
The Verdin PUD (Companion Rezoning Case No. Z-62-18-2) intregrates a number of
design considerations based on Desert Maintenane Character District standards.
These include a sensitive transition from open space to developed areas, conservation
of washes and wildlife habitats, and use of native plants.
In addition to the considerations based on overlay standards, the Planned Unit
Development includes enhanced standards for increased open space, connectivity to
adjacent preserve areas, a public trail and heightened landscape standards developed
in concert with the National Wildlife Federation.
Because these standards do not apply to property outside of the Verdin PUD request
area, staff is recommending a smaller modification to the applicability area proposed by
the applicant.
Background: Northeast Outer Loop and Sonoran Desert Drive
The Peripheral Areas C and D Plan included discussion of a proposed Northeast Outer
Loop. The Northeast Outer Loop was a planned limited access extension of the
Northwest Loop from Interstate 17, north of the Union Hills and Cave Buttes recreation
areas, connecting to Dynamite Boulevard and traversing east toward the city of
Page 572
Staff Report Z-TA-5-18-2
March 9, 2022
Page 5
Scottsdale. Proposed land uses for Area D (north of Jomax Road) were contemplated
based on proposed transportation infrastructure, with a Village Core planned for the
northwest corner of Cave Creek Road and the Northeast Outer Loop / Dynamite Road
alignment.
Peripheral Areas C and D Plan Land Use and Circulation, Source: City of Phoenix
By the North Land Use Plan’s adoption, plans for the Northeast Outer Loop had ceased.
As a result, the planned Core at Cave Creek and Dynamite Roads was reduced in size
and geared to function as a community service area instead of an employment hub.
Reduction in the planned commercial area at this location contributed to the inclusion of
the area west of Cave Creek Road into the Desert Preserve character area identified in
the plan. While no longer planned as a limited access roadway, Dynamite Road was
utilized as a dividing line between a planned preservation buffer for the Cave Creek
Wash to the north and a more dense residental area adjcent to the Cave Buttes
Recreational area to the south.
While an east-west connection between Interstate 17 and northeast Phoenix has been
planned since 1987, public involvment efforts to refine the alignment and type of
roadway commenced in 2002. The final aligment for Sonoran Parkway, adopted by
Phoenix City Council in 2006 as a result of the recommendation by the East Sonoran
Parkway Alignment Committee, was carefully designed to minimize the impact of the
roadway on the future mountain preserve area and intended to serve as a buffer
between the preserve and adjacent development. Construction of Sonoran Boulevard,
now known as the northern leg of Sonoran Desert Drive, began in 2010 and was
completed in 2013.
Staff Analysis
The boundary of the Desert Maintenance Overlay of the Desert Character Overlay
Districts was derived from the Desert Preserve character area outlined in the North
Land Use Plan. This preservation area distinguished between the planned preserve
area north of the then Dynamite Road alignment and the area adjacent to the Cave
Page 573
Staff Report Z-TA-5-18-2
March 9, 2022
Page 6
Buttes Recreational area, which was slated for additional residential development.
Subsequent to the approval of the Desert Character Overlay Districts, the roadway
connecting Interstate 17 to Cave Creek Road was further evaluated and realigned as
the currently constructed Sonoran Desert Drive.
In addition, the companion Verdin PUD request contains development standards and
design guidelines that are intended to provide consistency with Desert Maintenance
Overlay standards and the general intent of the Desert Character Overlay Districts.
These standards collectively ensure appropriate development within the undisturbed
desert context.
Due to the shift in the transportation corridor from the inception of the Desert Character
Overlay Districts in addition to the enhanced standards contained in the Verdin PUD,
the staff recommended modification to the Sub-District boundaries and associated
ordinance language is warranted.
Conclusion
Staff recommends approval of Z-TA-5-18-2 to amend the applicability area and
associated text for the Desert Maintenance Overlay of the Desert Character Overlay
Districts as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report.
Writer
S. Keating
March 9, 2022
Exhibits
Exhibit A: Proposed Language (4 pages)
Exhibit B: Text Amendment Sketch Map
Exhibit C: Staff Recommendation Text Amendment Sketch Map
Page 574
EXHIBIT A
Text Amendment Z-TA-5-18-2:
Modification of Boundaries of the Desert Character Overlay Districts
Proposed Language:
Amend Chapter 6, Section 653.A. (General Purpose of Desert Character Overlay
Districts) to replace Figure A and read as follows:
A. General Purpose of Desert Character Overlay Districts. The purpose of the
Desert Character Overlay Districts is to implement the north land use plan, to
define the nature of development while maintaining undisturbed areas, and to
provide guidance for new development to occur within the context of the fragile
undisturbed desert. The Desert Maintenance, Rural Desert and Suburban Desert
Overlay Districts are designed in response to existing undisturbed conditions and
pressures placed on them by increased development. The key to successful
development within the three districts, which maintain interconnected undisturbed
desert and washes, lies in analysis of individual subdivision sites before laying out
the design of streets and lots.
The Desert Maintenance Overlay District is divided into Subdistricts A and B,. as
illustrated on Figure A. in order to address specific requirements of this area.
Subdistrict A includes approximately one mile on both sides of the Cave Creek
Wash and includes the area along the wash, that is not part of any Parks,
Recreation and Library Department managed open space, such as the a Sonoran
Preserve. With the many washes to be maintained in an undisturbed condition
crossing this area, Subdistrict A is intended to provide a transition from the
preserve to areas with greater density. A very low density, scale and intensity of
residential development characterize this area. The Desert Maintenance Overlay
Subdistrict A is the least intensive with regards to density allowed and the most
restrictive in order to maintain the fragile undisturbed areas and the wildlife corridor
along the Cave Creek Wash. Subdistrict B is characterized by low
density development which may be sited in clusters along with provision for an
area to allow access to the Cave Buttes Recreational Area. Through clustering of
development in this area the ability to maintain large connected undisturbed areas
and washes becomes possible.
***
Figure A: Desert Maintenance Character DistrictS
Page 575
Page 576
Amend Chapter 6, Section 653.B.2. (Desert Maintenance Overlay (Sub-Districts A
and B), Applicability) to read as follows:
2. Applicability. The Desert Maintenance Overlay District applies to all land
within the area as depicted on the Desert Character District Map (Figure A).
More specifically, the Desert Maintenance Overlay Sub-District A applies to
all land within the area bounded by Carefree Highway on the north, the
Dynamite Boulevard alignment on the south, a line running parallel to the
Cave Creek Wash connecting the 24th Street alignment at Carefree
Highway to the 16th Street alignment at the Dynamite Boulevard alignment
along the west, and the west boundary of Dove Valley Ranch extending
south along the Black Mountain Parkway to Ashler Hills Drive and then
Page 577
running parallel to the Cave Creek Wash to the 32nd Street alignment at the
Dynamite Boulevard alignment along the east.
The Desert Maintenance Overlay Sub-District B applies to all land within the
area bounded by Sub-District A on the north, the Cave Buttes Recreation
Area along the south and west, and Cave Creek Road (excluding the
commercially designated parcel at the northwest corner of Cave Creek Road
and Dynamite Boulevard) together with the south and west boundary of the
Tatum Ranch Planned Community District (west of Cave Creek Road) and
Black Mountain Parkway along the east.
A site plan approved in accordance with Section 507 of the Zoning
Ordinance is required for all development, plus adherence to the design
guidelines and standards detailed below and in Section 507 Tab A of the
Zoning Ordinance.
***
Page 578
Text Amendment
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: Z-75-18 ACRES: 6222.46 +/-
VILLAGE: Desert View COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
APPLICANT: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
EXISTING:
DCOD A ( 4681.97 +/- Acres)
DCOD B ( 2001.87 +/- Acres)
E CAREFREE HWY
Desert Maintenance Character A
Overlay District D
KR
Desert Maintenance Character B
E EE
Overlay District SO CR
N OR
AN AV
E
DE NC
SE
RT
DR
E JOMAX RD
PROPOSED CHANGE:
DCOD A ( 3977.29 +/- Acres)
DCOD B ( 2245.17 +/- Acres)
E CAREFREE HWY
Desert Maintenance Character
A Overlay District D
Desert Maintenance Character KR
B Overlay District CR
E EE
SO
NO AV
RA E
N NC
DE
SE
RT
DR
E JOMAX RD
Page 579
Text Amendment
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: Z-75-18 ACRES: 6465.72 +/-
VILLAGE: Desert View COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
APPLICANT: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
EXISTING:
DCOD A ( 4681.97 +/- Acres)
DCOD B ( 2001.87 +/- Acres)
E CAREFREE HWY
Desert Maintenance Character A
Overlay District D
KR
Desert Maintenance Character B
Overlay District E EE
SO CR
N OR
AN AV
E
DE NC
SE
RT
DR
E JOMAX RD
PROPOSED CHANGE (Per Staff Recommendation):
DCOD A ( 4463.85 +/- Acres)
DCOD B ( 2001.87 +/- Acres)
E CAREFREE HWY
Desert Maintenance Character
A Overlay District D
Desert Maintenance Character KR
B Overlay District CR
E EE
SO
NO AV
RA E
N NC
DE
SE
RT
DR
E JOMAX RD
Page 580
Attachment C
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-5-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting December 7, 2021
Request Amend Section 653 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to
modify the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD)
boundaries between the 16th Street and 32nd Street
alignments
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #3 – Information Only – GPA-DSTV-1-18-2,
Item #4 – Information Only – Z-62-18-2, and Item #6 – Information Only – Z-75-18-2.
Committee member Reginal Younger arrived to the meeting and Committee member
Jason Israel left the meeting during this item, bringing the quorum to 11 members.
10 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve, will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes per
acre, and will have 7 miles of trails and community paths. She discussed the
application requests to rezone to PUD, amend the General Plan, and amend the Desert
Character Overlay District. She also discussed the extension and build out of Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt also discussed the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife
Federation (NWF). She discussed the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. She noted the NWF landscape palette, pedestrian
circulation, and open edge plan.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave asked about the cost of the extension of Sonoran Desert
Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that Verdin’s contribution will only be for a portion of the
extension. She stated that as other developers build along Sonoran Desert Drive they
will have their own contribution requirements.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 581
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that the North Land Use Plan should be considered in
addition to the General Plan. He stated that the developer should consider building less
than 1000 units. He added that the development will generate traffic and overload
schools. Susan Demmitt stated that the development will have a maximum of 3 units
per acre, which is consistent with developments adjacent to the preserve. She stated
that they are in discussion with the Deer Valley School District and the development is
within the boundary for Desert Mountain schools, which have capacity. She stated that
Cave Creek schools also have capacity.
Committee member Rick Nowell asked about traffic lights on Sonoran Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt stated that a traffic study is being completed and that there will most
likely be a traffic signal at the main entrance of the development in the future.
Committee member Rick Nowell stated that he had concerns that the project has
returned after a couple years, but not decreased the density.
Committee member Rick Powell asked about the cost of the extension of Sonoran
Desert Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that the cost estimate for the full extension of
Sonoran Desert Drive is approximately $120 million. She stated that the build out will
take place when the traffic demand exists and the funding is available. Committee
member Rick Powell stated that the development is not in line with the character of the
area.
Committee member Reginald Younger asked how close homes will be to Sonoran
Desert Drive. Susan Demmitt stated the development’s property line is adjacent to
Sonoran Desert Drive, but the site will have landscape buffers. Committee member
Reginald Younger stated that he is hoping for less density on site.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that the Desert View Character Plan should also be
take into account and to meet the character of the area, density should be decreased or
the development proposal be moved closer to the core. He added that Desert Mountain
and Cave Creek schools are too far from the development.
Committee member Jill Hankins asked if a flood analysis had been completed for the
site. Susan Demmitt stated that the site is not proposing development in the
established flood corridor or flood zone. Nguyen Lam, representative with Hilgart
Wilson, stated that the drainage corridors have mapped floodplains and are subject to
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). He added that the developer will
work with the City to appropriately address the flood zones. Committee member Jill
Hankins stated that she had concerns with additional hardscape in the area.
Committee member Michelle Santoro stated that she appreciates the design, open
space, and connectivity proposed by the development.
Daniel Centilli, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve and various trail running
groups, stated that developers see the area as a transportation corridor, but residents
see it as a recreation corridor. He added that the development will reduce quality of life.
He stated that other residential projects in the area have increased trash and traffic.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 582
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, stated that he appreciated the
partnership with the NWF and proposed trails and access. He added that the Desert
Character Overlay is tied to the preserve and should be retained.
Sue Pierce, a resident of Desert Enclave, stated that the area is exploding with
development, especially with the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company
(TSMC), but residential development will lead to increased traffic. She stated that traffic
issues are already complicated in the area and there is no plan from the development
about how to alleviate the issue. She added that major transportation will lead to
additional noise pollution. She stated that there is an opportunity to preserve the area
as a tranquil space in the Sonoran Preserve.
Susanne Rothwell, a member of the Phoenix Mountain Preservation Council,
expressed concerns regarding amending the Desert Character Overlay. She added
that the developer should keep 50% of the land as native and homes should be low
scale. She also expressed concerns with the lack of parking if a trailhead is provided on
site.
James Gaston, a resident of Tuscana at Tatum Ranch, questioned how the
development will deal with increases in water and sewer usage.
Bob Thompson, a member of the public, stated that he was opposed to the
development and instead wanted to preserve the area as natural preserve. He also
expressed concerns with traffic and density.
Scott Coll, a member of the public, expressed concerns with traffic. He added that
there is a need to preserve the preserve area.
Crystal Lehman, a member of the public, stated that Sonoran Desert Drive is a
pleasant driving experience as is and expanding the roadway and increasing homes
takes away from the beauty of the desert.
Rebecca Rodriguez, a local hiker, trail runner, and mountain biker, stated that she
enjoys the beautiful views and wildlife in the area. She expressed concerns with
increased noise from the roadway.
Paul Grayczyk, president of the Sonoran Gate Home Owner’s Association, stated the
he understands the area will develop eventually, but expressed concerns with density
and traffic. He added that the development should be set back further from Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt stated that she had no additional comments or responses at this time,
but will continue dialogue with the community going forward.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that Sonoran Desert Drive will increase to 6 lanes,
but that does not mean that the preserve area cannot be preserved. Committee
member Jill Hankins also expressed the need to retain open spaces in the City.
Committee member Rick Powell stated that he believes development should be
slower and the area kept more natural.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 583
Committee member Reginald Younger stated that he likes the look of Sonoran Desert
Drive as is and hopes that development will allow that to be retained. He also
expressed concerns with increased density.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 584
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-5-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting April 2, 2019
Request Modify the Desert Character Overlay District for
approximately 638 acres to modify a portion from Sub-
District A to Sub-District B and remove a portion of
property from Sub-District A
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, gave a presentation of the case up to this point in time. She
stated that they started this process back in August. Ms. Demmitt went through the
General Plan history of the area, along with the Desert Character Overlay District
establishment. She summarized the infrastructure improvements that would be required
for the subdivision to be built. Ms. Demmitt went on to describe the comments the
developer is receiving from members of the public. The first comment was that the
property should stay S-1. Ms. Demmitt stated that staying S-1 would be one home per
acre. Having a subdivision with multiple sized lots/homes would be more affordable for
residents to live in proximity to the preserve.
The next comment from the public that was addressed is the condition of Sonoran
Desert Drive. Ms. Demmitt stated they are working with the City and the State Land
Department to evaluate. She went on to present pages form the 2002 council report that
indicated that at full capacity, Sonoran Desert Drive will be able to handle 50,000 cars a
day. The road was intended to be a major thoroughfare.
The next concern Ms. Demmitt addressed was the acquisition of Sonoran Preserve
Land. She went on to state that the MacEwen property has been privately held since the
1950’s. Taylor Morrison is agreeable to put a public trail through the center of the
property, adjacent to the wash corridor, to connect the preserve north and south of
Sonoran Desert Drive. She stated they will comply with the Sonoran Edge Treatment
Guidelines. Ms. Demmitt stated the City’s Park and Recreation Department is currently
looking at acquiring the land to the east of the MacEwen parcel for preserve.
Lou Lagrave stated that he understands that Sonoran Desert Drive is intended to be a
six-lane arterial and the General Plan on the southern two-thirds of the property has the
land use designation that supports the proposed density but that he still has concerns.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 585
Mr. Lagrave stated that he is concerned about the traffic on Sonoran Desert Drive, how
the kids will get to school and the proposed lot sizes.
Susan Demmitt addressed Mr. Lagrave and stated that they are looking into what they
can do to alleviate some of the concerns regarding Sonoran Desert Drive but the
construction of the southern leg is 47 million dollars. She stated that the kids that live in
this development will have the option of attending either Deer Valley Schools or Cave
Creek Schools. She stated that both school districts will be providing bus service into
the neighborhood.
Jill Hankins asked if the Mesquite Wash is a 404 wash. Susan Demmitt referred to
Nguyen Lam on her development team. Mr. Lam stated they are disturbing less than an
acre and it is not within the 404-protected area. Ms. Hankins asked if there have been
any studies done regarding cultural items or protected species. Mr. Lam stated the
studies have been done and nothing was found.
Doug Dickson stated that the committee has received many emails opposition and not
one in support. Doug Dickson stated that they should talk to State Land about swapping
this parcel for a better suited piece of land. He asked if the applicant had explored this
option. Ms. Demmitt stated that the City hasn’t identified this piece of land as preserve
land, but they have not discussed a swap with State Land.
Steve Bowser stated that the committee has letters in front of them in opposition from
the Sierra Club and PMPC.
Steve Bowser read the cards in opposition that didn’t wish to speak.
The floor was opened for public comment.
Debra Sedillo Dugan, resident, stated she has concerns about the traffic and views. She
said the signs were posted where no one could see them until the applicant recently
moved them.
John Furniss, resident, stated he is the Chair of the Phoenix Mountain Preserve
Committee for the Parks and Recreation Department. He said there should be a letter
from their committee to deny this project. He stated that they aren’t opposed to growth,
but this will set precedence and that we need to protect what he have.
Stacie Beute, resident, stated she is opposed to the request. She has been a longtime
friend to the Phoenix Mountain Preserve and advises on committees. She said that
Taylor Morrison will be selling the homes with the added amenity of the proximity to the
preserve, but they are developing on the preserve. She stated she is concerned about
the impacts on the environment.
Amanda Farr, resident, stated that Sonoran Desert Drive is currently a safe place to
cycle and run. If this development is approved, it will no longer be safe.
Gary Kirkilas, resident, stated that he is a Park Steward for the Phoenix Mountain
Preserve. He stated that he started the Save Our Sonoran Preserve group as an
advocacy group in response to the request. He stated that the proposal isn’t consistent
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 586
with the North Land Use Plan and the Desert View Character Plan. Mr. Kirkilas urged
the committee that if it doesn’t make sense, say no to the proposal.
Daniel Centilli, resident, stated that he is a Desert Ridge homeowner. He said the
current DCOD overlay prevents something like this proposal from happening. He stated
that the applicant is asking for exceptions to the law. He went on to state the preserve is
our legacy.
Patrick Havley, resident, thanked the committee. He stated he is concerned for the
safety of cyclists on Sonoran Desert Drive. He also stated this project won’t contribute
to the overall good of the City.
Gannon Burleigh, resident, said that he is opposed and has concerns about traffic,
schools and the impact on the preserve. He said that the project is irresponsible
development and that the removal of the overlay district that protects the preserve is
ridiculous.
Laura Jones, resident, stated she has concerns about the traffic on Sonoran Desert
Drive. She stated the development should be one acre lots to preserve the wildlife.
Patrick McMullen, resident, states that he is the President of the PMPC. He stated that
the Phoenix Mountain Preserve Council has been around since the 1970’s to preserve
the desert. He stated that PMPC is opposed to the request.
Mandy Fellows, resident, passed out a study from an ASU professor concerning the
ecological impact and flooding concerns in the area. She stated that this area is
downstream from three dams, with the closest dam being 1.5 miles away.
John Trojan, resident, stated he is opposed to the request with concerns about traffic,
pedestrian safety and allowing the developer to craft their own zoning standards.
Lainy Porter, resident, stated she moved to Arizona for pain management. She stated
that she trains for triathlons on Sonoran Desert Drive and is concerned about the
increase in traffic.
Claudia Wagner, resident, stated she is a trail runner and has concerns about the
danger the increased traffic with cause on Sonoran Desert Drive. She is also concerned
about the potential for flooding.
Heather Larson, resident, stated she is concerned about the increase in traffic and
pedestrian safety.
Tim Holt, resident, said that he moved to Phoenix from Seattle. He said this proposal is
just setting precedence and the next development will be even more dense. Mr. Holt
went on to state this project is about money and greed.
Brett Scholar, resident, stated that he uses Sonoran Desert Drive to run and cycle. He
questioned the benefit the applicant will bring to the area. He stated that the property
should stay as it is currently zoned.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 587
Lindsey Tillman, resident, stated she is opposed to the request. She said that the City
needs to protect the Sonoran Preserve.
Susan Beccian, resident, stated that she is one of the only people that have received
letters about this case but didn’t receive one concerning the meeting tonight. She said
she is concerned that Gammage and Burnham isn’t being upfront with the community.
Cassandra Leone, resident, thanked her neighbors for coming out to oppose the zoning
request. She said she is concerned about pedestrian safety and the traffic on Sonoran
Desert Drive. She said she has read the PUD and has concerns about the sustainability
section.
Michelle Kelley, resident, stated that she is opposed to the request. She commented
that just because a plan is 30 years old doesn’t mean it’s not a good plan. It means the
community and the planning department were visioning long term. This request doesn’t
comply with the Desert View Character Plan. Ms. Kelley went on to state that the school
is over capacity and there is no real plan from the applicant to resolve that issue. She
closed by stating the area should be preserved and the plans should not be changed.
Sue Pierce, resident, stated that she is opposed to the request. Ms. Pierce went on to
state that this project is going to be a financial burden on taxpayers. Even though the
applicant must pay to extend infrastructure, the taxpayers pay to maintain this
infrastructure that is being extended to only serve this subdivision.
Christine Severance, resident, stated that that the signs for the hearing were posted far
from the road so they couldn’t be read. She stated the applicant purchased the property
with the current zoning and that it shouldn’t be changed.
Karen Severance, resident, stated that the preserve means a lot to her. She urged the
committee to think about the ecosystem when they vote on this case at a later date.
Jennifer Severance, resident, stated that nature needs to have space. The edges of the
preserve are important.
Karl Mar, resident, stated that he is opposed to the request. He said that the
infrastructure can’t handle a development of this size.
Patty Killinger, resident, stated that she has been in the area since the 1970’s. She said
that the parcel’s adjacency to the Sonoran Preserve is important.
Anna Lewandowski, resident, stated she just found out about the project about two
weeks ago and came to the meeting to learn more about it. She said from listening to
the applicant’s presentation and the testimony of the public, it sounds like this
development is 10 years too soon. The current infrastructure and school systems can’t
handle the residents this development will generate.
Mike Rooney, resident, stated this project is political. This development is not consistent
with the Desert View Character Plan.
Patricia Story, resident, stated that she is concerned for public safety in the areas. She
said the area already has an emergency response time issue.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 588
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-5-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting November 6, 2018
Request Modify the Desert Character Overlay District for
approximately 638 acres to modify a portion from Sub-
District A to Sub-District B and remove a portion of
property from Sub-District A
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, presented the information to the Village regarding MacEwen
480. She addressed the history of the site and the current requests to ultimately build
1,420 homes. She addressed that a portion of the 480 acres is within the Desert
Character Overlay District and the North Land Use Plan.
Lou Lagrave had questions regarding the alignment of Sonoran Desert Drive. He stated
it is a nice development in the wrong location and that there is no justification for the
density. He stated that according to the North Land Use Plan that this area is intended
to be 2 dwelling units per acre or less.
Rick Nowell clarified that the applicant would only be adding one lane in front of their
own development, not the entire length of Sonoran Desert Drive. He stated it is a nice
project in the wrong place. He stated that Sanctuary at Desert Ridge is unsightly and he
doesn’t want to see that in this location.
Rick Powell asked which school district in which the property is located. Ms. Demmitt
said Deer Valley.
Steve Bowser asked how long the land has been privately held. Ms. Demmitt stated
since the 1950’s.
Ryan Schaefer asked if the developer was contributing to the Sonoran Desert Drive
alignment. Ms. Demmitt said the subdivision will be contributing to impact fees.
Jill Hankins expressed concern about the safety of the cyclists on Sonoran Desert
Drive. She stated there needs to be an underpass and islands for the bikers.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 589
Steve Bowser opened the meeting to public comment.
Richard Puleri, resident, stated he has concerns about the current traffic congestion on
Sonoran Desert Drive and inquired on when Sonoran Desert Drive will be expanded
and connected.
Michael Kaciemba, resident, stated he lives in Sonoran Foothills and that he has
concerns about the current traffic congestion. He stated that this project shouldn’t be
improved until the streets are expanded. He also addressed the school doesn’t have
capacity.
Public comment closed.
Reginald Younger said that Taylor Morrison expanded the roads with Sky Crossing.
Rick Powell states he has concerns about the school capacity.
Deanna Chew asked if residents would have a City of Phoenix address. Ms. Demmitt
stated she believes they will.
Rick Nowell asked if a traffic study has been done. Ms. Demmitt says it was recently
completed but has not been submitted to the City yet.
There was a brief committee discussion concerning the possibility of age restriction
subdivisions within the development.
Louis Lagrave stated he believes in land rights but this needs to come back with R1-10
zoning. Louis Lagrave also requested staff send out the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 590
Attachment D
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-5-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting December 9, 2021
Request Amend Section 653 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to
modify the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD)
boundaries between the 16th Street and 32nd Street
alignments
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #3 – Information Only – GPA-DSTV-1-18-2,
Item #4 – Information Only – Z-62-18-2, and Item #6 – Information Only – Z-75-18-2.
Committee member Julie Read arrived to the meeting during this item, bringing the
quorum to 5 members.
3 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve, will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes per
acre, and will have 7 miles of trails and community paths. She discussed the
application requests to rezone to PUD, amend the General Plan, and amend the Desert
Character Overlay District. She also discussed the extension and build out of Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt also discussed the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife
Federation (NWF). She discussed the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. She noted the NWF landscape palette, pedestrian
circulation, and open edge plan.
Vice Chair Shannon Simon asked about the timeline for constructing Sonoran Desert
Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that the buildout for Sonoran Desert Drive will cost
approximately $120 million and there is no defined timeline. She stated that the
development will complete a Traffic Impact Study to determine the level of service and
the necessary improvements.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 591
Committee member Michelle Ricart asked whether the applicant reached out to the
school district. Susan Demmitt stated that they are working with the school district on
a donation agreement. She added that there will be no modifications to the boundaries
of the school district and students living in the development will be within the boundary
of Desert Mountain schools.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, expressed concerns with
removal of the Desert Character Overlay. He stated that areas adjacent to preserve
areas should be low density. He also expressed concerns regarding increased traffic.
Paul Grayczyk, president of the Sonoran Gate Home Owner’s Association, encouraged
larger setbacks from Sonoran Desert Drive.
Bob Thompson, a member of the public, stated that the beauty of the area should be
maintained. He added that the developer should honor the Desert Character Overlay
and keep the preserve areas as is.
Susan Demmitt stated that she had no additional comments or responses at this time,
but will continue dialogue with the community going forward.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 592
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-5-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting November 8, 2018
Request Modify the Desert Character Overlay District for
approximately 638 acres to modify a portion from Sub-
District A to Sub-District B and remove a portion of
property from Sub-District A
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, presented the information to the Village regarding MacEwen
480 PUD. She addressed the history of the site and the current requests to ultimately
build 1,420 homes. She addressed that a portion of the 480 acres is within the Desert
Character Overlay District and the North Land Use Plan. She stated they are working
with the Deer Valley School District to come up with a solution to the school capacity
issue. She stated they are looking into the option of Cave Creek Schools.
Tim Mitten, VPC member, expressed several concerns:
- Traffic safety and cyclist safety on Sonoran Desert Drive.
- Public safety response time.
- Elimination of the night sky.
- Density is too high.
He then asked if the applicant has been in communication with the State Land
Department to see when the surrounding land will be opened for auction. Susan
Demmitt stated it won’t be within the next 5 years.
Jason Stokes, VPC member, asked where the closest fire station is located. Ms.
Demmitt stated Cave Creek and Dynamite.
Steve Tucker, VPC member, asked what would happen in the notch. Ms. Demmitt
states most likely residential. Mr. Tucker stated that the road improvements to Sonoran
Desert Drive need to happen before development.
Julie Read, VPC member, asked how many homes are approved for Sonoran Gate. Ms.
Demmitt responded 255 homes.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 593
Shannon Simon, VPC member, inquired about the City’s timeline for the complete build
out of Sonoran Desert Drive. She stated the light pollution from Sonoran Gate isn’t as
bad as she thought. Ms. Simon then asked if all the neighborhoods will be gated. Ms.
Demmitt responded that some neighborhoods will be gated.
Julie Read, VPC member, stated she has concerns about the school capacity issue and
the fact that some of the students could be going to Cave Creek Schools. She stated
that a neighborhood elementary school builds a sense of community. Ms. Read asked
what the target market will be for this development. Ms. Demmitt states they are still
trying to identify the target. Julie Read asked how many children there are in Sonoran
Gate. A resident in the audience who lives in Sonoran Gate stated about 1 in 8 homes
have kids.
Michelle Ricart, VPC member, stated that Sonoran Gate has a lot of amenities for kids
so there might not be a lot of kids right now but they can come. She stated she is
concerned with the school capacity. She said that it is at least a 20 to 25-minute drive to
the closest Cave Creek elementary school by car, so it would be even longer by bus.
Susan Demmitt stated that Taylor Morrison is committed to working with the school
districts to find a solution.
Michelle Ricart, VPC member, stated she is concerned about school buses going in and
out of the neighborhood with the traffic and the speeds vehicles travel along Sonoran
Desert Drive. She also stated open enrollment can be deceiving because students can
get kicked out of the school.
The floor was open to public comment.
Michelle Kelly, resident, stated she was opposed to the request. She stated she is
concerned about the density. She stated she lives in Sonoran Foothills, which is lower
in density than the proposed project. She stated that Sonoran Foothills Elementary land
was gifted by the developer. She is concerned about police and fire response times.
She stated the project is too dense without the proper infrastructure in place.
Burt Bragin, resident, voiced his concerns about Sonoran Desert Drive and the current
traffic. He stated the connection to the 303 needs to be made before the project is
approved. He stated Sonoran Foothills has 1,300 homes and a school was gifted by the
developer. He stated this development has 6 to 7 times more homes that Sonoran Gate.
Susan Demmitt, applicant, stated that Deer Valley Schools doesn’t want a school site at
this location.
Cynthia Wise, resident, stated she is in favor of the request. She said Taylor Morrison
did a great job with the current infrastructure improvements within Sonoran Gate.
Gary Kirkilas, resident, stated he is a park steward for the Apache Wash trailhead. He
stated this development would change the entire character of the area. He then asked
the developer how they will make it look like the preserve.
J.R. Oliver, resident, stated she lives in Sonoran Foothills and has to wait a long time to
get out of her subdivision. She stated the connection to the 303 would help a lot.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 594
Susan Demmitt, applicant, stated that is more of a regional issue and to talk to the City’s
Street Transportation Department.
Sue Pierce, resident, stated she opposes the project and is a resident of Desert
Enclave. She said on the way to the meeting they had to wait until 56 cars went by to
turn out. She stated this development will have an adverse reaction on the desert
wildlife and preserve area. She stated this development is in contradiction of the
Sonoran Preserve Master Plan.
L. Chicchillo, resident, stated the current Taylor Morrison project looks like row houses.
He stated he lives in Desert Enclave and is worried about the traffic.
Spero Papos, resident, asked if the land had been purchased. The applicant confirmed
it had not been purchased yet. He inquired about traffic lights.
Julie Read, VPC member asked if the applicant has met with ADOT because they
would like to see more information about the project.
There was then a committee discussion about how Dove Valley Road, Cave Creek
Road and 27th Avenue all get flooded out in the monsoon storms.
Tim Mitten, VPC member, stated that the North Gateway minutes will be forwarded onto
the Desert View VPC with their packet so they are aware of the discussion that took
place.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 595
Attachment E
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-5-18-2
Date of VPC Meeting March 10, 2022
Request Amend Section 653 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to
modify the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD)
boundaries
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation to amend the
applicability area and associated text for the Desert
Maintenance Overlay of the Desert Character Overlay
Districts as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report
VPC Vote 4-1
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #5 – Z-75-18-2, Item #6 – GPA-DSTV-18-2,
and Item #7 – Z-62-18-2.
10 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Julianna Pierre provided information regarding Z-TA-5-18-2, a text amendment to
revise the applicability area and associated text for the Desert Maintenance Overlay
District (DMOD) of the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD). She explained the
permitted uses and standards for the two sub-districts in the DMOD, Sub-District A and
Sub-District B. She explained that the southern boundary of the DMOD aligns with the
Northeast Outerloop Freeway alignment outlined in the Peripheral Areas C and D Plan.
Julianna Pierre explained that applicant’s proposed modifications would remove Sub-
District A standards from the property south of Sonoran Desert Drive and west of Cave
Creek Wash. Additionally, the land south of Sonoran Desert Drive and east of Cave
Creek Wash, currently in Sub-District A, would become part of Sub-District B. She
stated that staff’s recommendation is to only remove Sub-District A standards from an
approximately 155.06-acre portion of the original request. She added that the text
amendment also includes changes to the Zoning Ordinance and the staff
recommendation is for approval of Z-TA-5-18-2 to amend the applicability area and
associated text for the DMOD of the DCOD as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 596
Julianna Pierre explained that Z-75-18-2 is the rezoning case associated with the
aforementioned text amendment and would remove the DCOD designation from the
zoning districts. She explained that the applicant proposed and staff recommended
areas were identical to those in Z-TA-5-18-2, but the staff recommendation for Z-75-18-
2 is denial as filed, approval of the staff recommended area.
Julianna Pierre explained that GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 was a request from Preserves /
Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre,
Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre, and Preserves / Floodplain to Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre
/ Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Preserves / Floodplain, with removal of
the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (IPO). She explained that the IPO acted as a timing
element to ensure growth was concentrated within the Infrastructure Limit Line (ILL), a
guide to where the City would extend water and sewer infrastructure to support
development. She stated that significant investment and development has occurred
within the boundaries of the ILL and there are opportunities to revisit the overlay and
reassess development beyond the ILL. She added that staff is recommending approval
of GPA-DSTV-1-18-2.
Julianna Pierre stated that Z-62-18-2 is a rezoning request of 488.63 acres at the
southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive from S-1
DCOD, S-1, and RE-35 DCOD to PUD DCOD (pending PUD) and PUD. She added
that the proposed PUD will allow single-family residential development.
Julianna Pierre stated that the development is proposing a master-planned residential
community with a maximum 1,420 units at a density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre.
There will be a collection of single-family neighborhoods with various amenities, open
spaces, and a pedestrian network. She also discussed the permitted uses, connectivity
to the adjacent Sonoran Preserve, open space, and amenities.
Julianna Pierre reviewed the community input received since 2018, which included 82
letters in opposition and 6 letters in support. She stated that the letters in opposition
expressed concerns regarding: road infrastructure, increased traffic, decreased resident
safety, preserve areas not maintained for outdoor activities, negative impacts on the
area’s natural flora and fauna, maintaining the requirements for the DCOD, density,
number of units, water resources, Sonoran Desert Drive remaining a scenic corridor, the
proposed development not matching the character of the area, strain on the school
district, and lack of amenities to support the development.
Julianna Pierre reviewed the staff finding and stipulations for Z-62-18-2, noting that
Stipulation No. 1 had corrections to the PUD name and date stamped date. She added
that staff recommended approval, subject to stipulations.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve and will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes
per acre. She discussed the history of applicable plans that apply to the site, such as
the DMCO, Peripheral Areas C and D Plan, and Phoenix General Plan. She explained
that the Verdin property was always intended to develop as residential. She also
discussed the eventual build out of Sonoran Desert Drive and the infrastructure
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 597
improvements that Verdin developers will build along Sonoran Desert Drive. She also
noted that developers are working with the Deer Valley Unified School District.
Alex Steadman, representative with RVi, stated that the Verdin development will have
a unique vision and design approach. He discussed the partnership with the National
Wildlife Federation (NWF), noting the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. He discussed the certified habitat open space areas,
specifically the preserved habitat, re-established habitat, and maintained open space.
He stated that the playscapes will include nature trails with education nodes, parks,
trailheads, informative signage, and community amenities. He also provided an
example of the NWF landscape palette.
Alex Steadman also discussed the pedestrian circulation and edge openness plans.
He stated that the development will have an open trailhead for the public, which
includes public parking, community gathering spaces, and access to water. He added
that there will be a variable edge adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve and Mesquite Wash.
He also noted that the Verdin PUD provides parallels to the DCOD.
Vice Chair Shannon Simon appreciated the thoughtful design of the development and
stated that the project was high quality.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, provided a presentation and
discussed the importance of the DCOD. He stated that the DCOD was intended to
maintain the fragile undisturbed areas of the wildlife corridor along the Cave Creek
Wash, a major floodway and floodplain. He added that the Zoning Ordinance discusses
how development in the DCOD should blend with the undisturbed desert environment
rather than dominate it. He added the DCOD states that the Dynamite Boulevard
alignment acts as the southern boundary, and makes no reference to Sonoran Desert
Drive. He added that moving the DCOD boundary further north eliminates the purpose
of the overlay.
Patrick McMullen, President of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council,
appreciated the applicant linking the development to the Sonoran Preserve, but still had
concerns regarding removal of the DCOD, especially when the DCOD would dictate the
number of units permitted on the site. He also expressed concerns regarding the width
of the trail along the Mesquite Wash.
Susanne Rothwell, a member of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, stated
that the Sonoran Collaborative assisted with writing the DCOD chapter of the Zoning
Ordinance and there was an enormous amount of research regarding the fragile
corridors in the area. She requested lower density and single-story residences. She
added that DCOD should remain in place.
Ann Wilde, a member of the public, stated that development should not affect the
desert character. She stated that development should occur with the DCOD in place.
Cynthia Weiss, a resident of Sonoran Gate, the closest residential development to
Verdin, appreciated Verdin’s thoughtful development.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 598
Kara Nicholls, a member of the public who lives adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve,
stated that she was excited about Verdin providing a connection to the northern and
southern portions of the Preserve. She appreciated the NWF collaboration and stated
this development will aid in home ownership since homes on an acre are unobtainable
for many.
Rob Nash-Boulden, a member of the public, asked the Village Planning Committee to
reconsider and deny the request to remove the DCOD from the site. He stated that the
DCOD should be retained. He also expressed concern that the development will be
built with no close connections to services.
Robert Thompson, a member of the public, disagreed with the change in zoning.
Jennifer Ruby, a member of the public, stated that Verdin will be a vibrant place for
people to live. She noted that the project is low density and thoughtful with accessible
housing.
Keeli Keeler, a member of the public, stated that the DCOD should remain in place and
that the proposed number of units will change the desert character.
Susan Demmitt stated that standards outlined in the DCOD have been taken into
account and worked into the Verdin project. She added that the land adjacent to
Sonoran Desert Drive is expected to develop in the future and Verdin will act as a
precedent for what’s to come.
MOTION: Committee member Michelle Ricart made a motion to approve Z-TA-5-18-
2, per the staff recommendation to amend the applicability area and associated text for
the Desert Maintenance Overlay of the Desert Character Overlay Districts as shown in
Exhibit A of the staff report. The motion was seconded by Vice Chair Shannon Simon.
VOTE: 4-1 with Committee members Simon, Kreiger, Ricart, and Tome in favor and
Chair Stokes in opposition.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 599
Attachment F
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-5-18-2
Date of VPC Meeting April 5, 2022
Request Amend Section 653 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to
modify the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD)
boundaries
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation to amend the
applicability area and associated text for the Desert
Maintenance Overlay of the Desert Character Overlay
Districts as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report
VPC Vote 7-4
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
Cases Z-TA-5-18-2, Z-75-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, and Z-62-18-2 were heard
concurrently.
Five requests to speak in favor and five requests to speak in opposition were made for
this request.
Committee member Reginald Younger joined during this item, bringing quorum to 10.
Committee member Jill Hankins joined during this item, bringing quorum to 11.
Committee member Mark Warren joined during this item, bringing quorum to 12.
Committee member Reginald Younger left during this item, bringing quorum to 11.
Staff Presentation
Julianna Pierre, staff, provided a combined presentation for companion cases Z-TA-5-
18-2, Z-75-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, and Z-62-18-2. Ms. Pierre reviewed the history of
the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD) and the alignment of Sonoran Desert
Drive. She explained that staff recommends a more limited area to be removed from the
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 600
DOCD, as shown on the map in the staff report. She explained that the Z-75-18-2 case
mirrors the text amendment case, updating the zoning designation to remove the
overlay district, and that staff recommends denial as filed, approval of the staff
recommended area. Ms. Pierre went on to review the General Plan Amendment,
describing the history and purpose of the designations, noting that staff recommends
approval. She then provided an overview of the PUD proposal in Rezoning Case Z-62-
18-2, reviewing the land use proposal and site plan, connectivity proposal, open space
provisions, and amenities. She discussed the community input that has been received
and summarized written materials. Finally, she noted that staff recommends approval
with stipulations.
Applicant Presentation
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, summarized the history of
the site and planning efforts for the proposed project. She stated that the subject site is
private property and has never been designated to be part of a preserve area. She
reviewed the surrounding area, summarized the applicant’s proposal, and discussed
new proposed stipulations that she suggested the committee incorporate into its
approval. She summarized the purpose of the Desert Character Overlay District and
stated that the impact of removing the overlay would allow a master planned community
with density spread to the whole site.
Alex Stedman, representative with RVi, discussed the design approach and
relationship to the surrounding open space, including the partnership with the National
Wildlife Federation. He shared a map that indicated the proposed certified habitat open
spaces within the site, discussed the proposed landscape palette and plant list, and
stated that the Mesquite Wash would serve as a connector between the north and south
portions of the preserve. He reviewed the edge openness plan and the design of open
edges with public trail access points. Finally, he described the elements of the DCOD
that have been incorporated into the design of the development.
Susan Demmitt described the additional stipulations – which include a reduced density
limit, elimination of the smallest lot size, an additional open space buffer along the
eastern property line, public access easements at certain locations, and a multi-use trail
easement along the wash corridor – proposed by the applicant and requested that the
committee incorporate the additional stipulations into their approval. Additionally, she
stated that the subject site has always been designated for development in the City’s
General Plan and the proposed density is within the limits of the designation and that
the applicant hopes to set a good example of appropriate development in this corridor.
Committee Questions
Vice Chair Lagrave asked about the designation of 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre in
the General Plan Amendment, which is not necessary to facilitate the proposed project.
He further asked about the southeast corner and if it would make sense to donate the
land to the Parks and Recreation Department.
Susan Demmitt replied that the applicant would be open to removing the General Plan
classification of 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and that the applicant would be willing to
work with the Parks and Recreation Department on a dedication of the southeast corner
of the site if it was of interest to the City.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 601
Committee Member Nowell asked about the development parcel allocation table in
which the numbers for individual parcels do not add up to the total for the full site. Ms.
Demmitt replied that the individual parcels have flexibility in the unit totals, but the
overall total cannot exceed the maximum for the full site.
Mr. Nowell asked if homeowners would be prohibited from planting non-native plants.
Mr. Stedman replied that individual homeowners would be required to follow the plant
list for the PUD. Committee Member Reynolds added that rear yard plant prohibitions
are possible and are done in other communities, asking further if fruit trees will be
prohibited in the community. Mr. Stedman replied that the applicant team would explore
the idea.
Mr. Nowell asked how many lots would be affected by the base flood elevation and how
much those houses would need to be elevated.
Nguyen Lam, representative with Hilgart Wilson, replied that it would primarily be lots
fronting on the Mesquite Wash, but they don’t have a precise number since the parcels
haven’t been finalized. He added that they would raise the houses to 1 foot above the
base flood elevation.
Ms. Reynolds asked if the natural preservation areas will be marked so the community
knows where they are. Mr. Stedman replied that they have discussed signage with the
NWF and there are opportunities to do signage. Ms. Demmitt added that the applicant
wants the public to recognize that these are public benefits.
Committee Member Kollar asked for clarification on the DCOD removal area. Ms.
Pierre replied that staff is recommending only the Verdin site be removed from the
DCOD at this time and any other sites would need to be evaluated on a case-by-case
basis. Ms. Demmitt added that the package of commitments from the specific PUD
justifies the removal of the DCOD.
Mr. Nowell asked for clarification on making motions with amendments. Vice Chair
Lagrave replied that the committee can make the appropriate amendments in their
motions.
Public Comments
Gary Kirkilas introduced himself and provided a history of the DCOD, noting that its
purpose was to maintain the Cave Creek Wash. He stated that the entire Cave Creek
Wash needs to be protected and that the DCOD boundaries should be at the Dynamite
Boulevard alignment, not moved to the north. He further stated that DCOD only applies
to one-third of the property, allowing the developer to build on the site without removing
the DCOD. He stated that he believes the committee should vote yes on development
but keep the DCOD in place.
Donald Bessler introduced himself and stated that he believes this is a property rights
issue and that more housing should be built, adding that he supports the proposal and
believes it will be a good product.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 602
Susanne Rothwell introduced herself and stated that the Desert View Village Planning
Committee voted in favor of the DCOD when it was originally written. She stated that
everyone was in favor of it at the time and it was a great piece of planning and
legislation.
Brian Sullivan introduced himself, noting that he has worked and spent much time in
the preserve area, and stated that there are maps that show this area designated for
acquisition and preservation. He stated that minimizing density would limit the impact to
wildlife and that preserving the flats is important.
Sue Pierce introduced herself and stated the concern that the work that goes into
making plans can be easily reversed by a developer who doesn’t have a full
understanding of the issues.
Kara Nicholls introduced herself and stated that Phoenix needs attainable housing
because of its rapid growth rate. She noted that people are having trouble finding
homes in the area and that the developer has done a great job with the proposed
development.
Jennifer Ruby introduced herself and stated that the proposed development is a great
opportunity for the community and that it would provide housing for all the new jobs
coming to the north Phoenix area.
Cynthia Weiss introduced herself and stated that she supports the proposal because
there are other active families that want to live in this location near all of the open space
amenities.
James Gaston introduced himself and stated that he does not agree with removing the
DCOD and believes one home per acre is appropriate. He further noted that there is
academic research, stating concerns about groundwater issues in regard to
overdevelopment.
Sara Altieri introduced herself and stated that she knew the area would change over
time when she bought a home nearby. She stated that the development incorporates
sensitivity to natural wildlife.
Applicant Response
Susan Demmitt stated that she feels the applicant has addressed the concerns and
would be happy to discuss any follow up questions.
Committee Discussion
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that he was originally in favor of the R1-10 designation and
that he is concerned about keeping the DCOD in the northern portion because it would
push more density into the southern portion. He stated that he believes the
development will allow wildlife to flourish and that he supports the project.
Committee Member Israel asked if there is a current allowance for housing on the site.
Vice Chair Lagrave replied that there is.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 603
Committee Member Powell stated that this site is far from the 101 and I-17 freeways
and should be the lowest density. He stated the concern about other sites along the
corridor seeking higher densities, adding that he doesn’t believe the request is in
character and is not in favor of moving the DCOD line. He further stated that the homes
in this development will not be affordable or attainable and that there is room in other
parts of the village that could be developed at higher densities, closer to the freeway.
Committee Member Santoro stated that the PUD is very thorough and thoughtful and
that she appreciates the reduction in density. She stated that she does not agree with
the current alignment of the DCOD line and that the majority of the property is in
alignment with the DCOD guidelines.
Committee Member Nowell stated that he believes the proposal is a good
compromise, even though it is not perfect, adding that he would like to see the approved
plant include particular restrictions in the back yards of individual homes.
Chair Bowser stated that it is important to remember that the proposal is to eliminate
the DCOD at the site in exchange for an entire new set of rules outlined in the PUD. He
further stated that one house per acre is not a desirable type of development, noting the
downsides to one-acre lot development, including that it’s not walkable and people do
not know their neighbors.
Committee Member Hankins stated that she would be in favor of the development if it
were closer to existing infrastructure and that she is concerned about the costs of
infrastructure driving up home prices.
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that affordable housing is typically found in other parts of the
city and that he believes that infrastructure costs will be lower for future developments.
MOTION – Z-TA-5-18-2
Vice Chair Lagrave made a motion to recommend approval of Z-TA-5-18-2, per the
staff recommendation. Committee Member Santoro seconded the motion.
VOTE
7-4, motion to recommend approval, per staff recommendation, passed; Members
Dean, Israel, Kollar, Santoro, Warren, Lagrave, and Bowser in favor; Members Hankins,
Nowell, Powell, and Reynolds against.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 604
Attachment G
ADDENDUM A
Staff Report: Z-TA-5-18-2
(Modification to the Desert Character Overlay District)
April 26, 2022
Application No. Z-TA-5-18-2: Amend Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance to modify
the boundaries of the Desert Character Overlay District.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Z-TA-5-18-2 per Addendum A.
The applicant’s original request was to modify the boundaries of both Sub-District A and
Sub-District B. Sub-District A standards are proposed to be removed from the area
south of Sonoran Desert Drive and west of Cave Creek Wash. Land south of Sonoran
Desert Drive and east of Cave Creek Wash, currently in Sub-District A, would become a
part of Sub-District B.
The applicant proposed to modify their request to align with the staff recommendation to
remove Sub-District A standards for approximately 155.06 acres of the Desert
Character Overlay District.
The associated text updates and sketch maps are attached to reflect this update.
Exhibits
Proposed Language (4 pages)
Sketch Map
Page 605
EXHIBIT A
Text Amendment Z-TA-5-18-2:
Modification of Boundaries of the Desert Character Overlay Districts
Proposed Language:
Amend Chapter 6, Section 653.A. (General Purpose of Desert Character Overlay
Districts) to replace Figure A and read as follows:
A. General Purpose of Desert Character Overlay Districts. The purpose of the
Desert Character Overlay Districts is to implement the north land use plan, to
define the nature of development while maintaining undisturbed areas, and to
provide guidance for new development to occur within the context of the fragile
undisturbed desert. The Desert Maintenance, Rural Desert and Suburban Desert
Overlay Districts are designed in response to existing undisturbed conditions and
pressures placed on them by increased development. The key to successful
development within the three districts, which maintain interconnected undisturbed
desert and washes, lies in analysis of individual subdivision sites before laying out
the design of streets and lots.
The Desert Maintenance Overlay District is divided into Subdistricts A and B,. as
illustrated on Figure A. in order to address specific requirements of this area.
Subdistrict A includes approximately one mile on both sides of the Cave Creek
Wash and includes the area along the wash, that is not part of any Parks,
Recreation and Library Department managed open space, such as the a Sonoran
Preserve. With the many washes to be maintained in an undisturbed condition
crossing this area, Subdistrict A is intended to provide a transition from the
preserve to areas with greater density. A very low density, scale and intensity of
residential development characterize this area. The Desert Maintenance Overlay
Subdistrict A is the least intensive with regards to density allowed and the most
restrictive in order to maintain the fragile undisturbed areas and the wildlife corridor
along the Cave Creek Wash. Subdistrict B is characterized by low
density development which may be sited in clusters along with provision for an
area to allow access to the Cave Buttes Recreational Area. Through clustering of
development in this area the ability to maintain large connected undisturbed areas
and washes becomes possible.
***
Figure A: Desert Maintenance Character DistrictS
Page 606
Page 607
Amend Chapter 6, Section 653.B.2. (Desert Maintenance Overlay (Sub-Districts A
and B), Applicability) to read as follows:
2. Applicability. The Desert Maintenance Overlay District applies to all land
within the area as depicted on the Desert Character District Map (Figure A).
More specifically, the Desert Maintenance Overlay Sub-District A applies to
all land within the area bounded by Carefree Highway on the north, the
Dynamite Boulevard alignment on the south, a line running parallel to the
Cave Creek Wash connecting the 24th Street alignment at Carefree
Highway to the 16th Street alignment at the Dynamite Boulevard alignment
along the west, and the west boundary of Dove Valley Ranch extending
south along the Black Mountain Parkway to Ashler Hills Drive and then
Page 608
running parallel to the Cave Creek Wash to the 32nd Street alignment at the
Dynamite Boulevard alignment along the east.
The Desert Maintenance Overlay Sub-District B applies to all land within the
area bounded by Sub-District A on the north, the Cave Buttes Recreation
Area along the south and west, and Cave Creek Road (excluding the
commercially designated parcel at the northwest corner of Cave Creek Road
and Dynamite Boulevard) together with the south and west boundary of the
Tatum Ranch Planned Community District (west of Cave Creek Road) and
Black Mountain Parkway along the east.
A site plan approved in accordance with Section 507 of the Zoning
Ordinance is required for all development, plus adherence to the design
guidelines and standards detailed below and in Section 507 Tab A of the
Zoning Ordinance.
***
Page 609
Text Amendment
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: Z-TA-5-18-2 ACRES: 6465.72 +/-
VILLAGE: Desert View COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
APPLICANT: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
EXISTING:
DCOD A ( 4681.97 +/- Acres)
DCOD B ( 2001.87 +/- Acres)
E CAREFREE HWY
Desert Maintenance Character A
Overlay District D
KR
Desert Maintenance Character B
Overlay District E EE
SO CR
N OR
AN AV
E
DE NC
SE
RT
DR
E JOMAX RD
PROPOSED CHANGE:
DCOD A ( 4526.91 +/- Acres)
DCOD B ( 2001.87 +/- Acres)
E CAREFREE HWY
Desert Maintenance Character
A Overlay District D
Desert Maintenance Character KR
B Overlay District CR
E EE
SO
NO AV
RA E
N NC
DE
SE
RT
DR
E JOMAX RD
Page 610
Attachment H
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
May 5, 2022
ITEM NO: 7
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:
Application #: Z-TA-5-18-2 (Companion Cases GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, Z-75-18-2, and Z-62-
18-2)
Location: South of Sonoran Desert Drive between 16th and 32nd Street alignments
Proposal: Amend Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance to modify the boundaries of
the Desert Character Overlay District.
Applicant: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Owner: MacEwan Ranch, LLC
Representative: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Approval, as shown in Exhibit A.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
North Gateway 11/8/2018 Information only.
Desert View 11/6/2018 Information only.
Desert View 4/2/2019 Information only.
Desert View 12/7/2021 Information only.
North Gateway 12/9/2021 Information only.
North Gateway 3/10/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 4-1.
Desert View 4/5/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 7-4.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Addendum A Staff Report.
Motion Discussion: N/A
Motion details: Commissioner Simon made a MOTION to approve Z-TA-5-18-2, per the
Addendum A Staff Report.
Maker: Simon
Second: Mangum
Vote: 7-1 (Perez)
Absent: Gaynor
Opposition Present: Yes
Findings:
1. The boundary of the Desert Maintenance Overlay of the Desert Character Overlay
Districts was derived from the Desert Preserve character area outlined in the North
Land Use Plan. This preservation area distinguished between the planned preserve
area north of the then Dynamite Road alignment and the area adjacent to the Cave
Buttes Recreational area, which was slated for additional residential development.
Subsequent to the approval of the Desert Character Overlay Districts, the roadway
connecting Interstate 17 to Cave Creek Road was further evaluated and realigned as
the currently constructed Sonoran Desert Drive.
Page 611
2. The companion Verdin PUD request contains development standards and
design guidelines that are intended to provide consistency with Desert Maintenance
Overlay standards and the general intent of the Desert Character Overlay Districts.
These standards collectively ensure appropriate development within the undisturbed
desert context.
3. Due to the shift in the transportation corridor from the inception of the Desert
Character Overlay Districts in addition to the enhanced standards contained in the
Verdin PUD, the staff recommended modification to the Sub-District boundaries and
associated ordinance language is warranted.
Proposed Language:
Amend Chapter 6, Section 653.A. (General Purpose of Desert Character Overlay Districts)
to replace Figure A and read as follows:
A. General Purpose of Desert Character Overlay Districts. The purpose of the Desert
Character Overlay Districts is to implement the north land use plan, to define the nature
of development while maintaining undisturbed areas, and to provide guidance for new
development to occur within the context of the fragile undisturbed desert. The Desert
Maintenance, Rural Desert and Suburban Desert Overlay Districts are designed in
response to existing undisturbed conditions and pressures placed on them by increased
development. The key to successful development within the three districts, which
maintain interconnected undisturbed desert and washes, lies in analysis of individual
subdivision sites before laying out the design of streets and lots.
The Desert Maintenance Overlay District is divided into Subdistricts A and B,. as
illustrated on Figure A. in order to address specific requirements of this area. Subdistrict
A includes approximately one mile on both sides of the Cave Creek Wash and includes
the area along the wash, that is not part of any Parks, Recreation and Library
Department managed open space, such as the a Sonoran Preserve. With the many
washes to be maintained in an undisturbed condition crossing this area, Subdistrict A is
intended to provide a transition from the preserve to areas with greater density. A very
low density, scale and intensity of residential development characterize this area. The
Desert Maintenance Overlay Subdistrict A is the least intensive with regards to
density allowed and the most restrictive in order to maintain the fragile undisturbed areas
and the wildlife corridor along the Cave Creek Wash. Subdistrict B is characterized by
low density development which may be sited in clusters along with provision for an area
to allow access to the Cave Buttes Recreational Area. Through clustering of
development in this area the ability to maintain large connected undisturbed areas and
washes becomes possible.
***
Page 612
Figure A: Desert Maintenance Character DistrictS
Page 613
Amend Chapter 6, Section 653.B.2. (Desert Maintenance Overlay (Sub-Districts A and B),
Applicability) to read as follows:
2. Applicability. The Desert Maintenance Overlay District applies to all land within
the area as depicted on the Desert Character District Map (Figure A). More
specifically, the Desert Maintenance Overlay Sub-District A applies to all land
within the area bounded by Carefree Highway on the north, the Dynamite
Boulevard alignment on the south, a line running parallel to the Cave Creek Wash
connecting the 24th Street alignment at Carefree Highway to the 16th Street
alignment at the Dynamite Boulevard alignment along the west, and the west
boundary of Dove Valley Ranch extending south along the Black Mountain
Parkway to Ashler Hills Drive and then running parallel to the Cave Creek Wash
to the 32nd Street alignment at the Dynamite Boulevard alignment along the east.
Page 614
The Desert Maintenance Overlay Sub-District B applies to all land within the area
bounded by Sub-District A on the north, the Cave Buttes Recreation Area along
the south and west, and Cave Creek Road (excluding the commercially
designated parcel at the northwest corner of Cave Creek Road and Dynamite
Boulevard) together with the south and west boundary of the Tatum Ranch
Planned Community District (west of Cave Creek Road) and Black Mountain
Parkway along the east.
A site plan approved in accordance with Section 507 of the Zoning Ordinance is
required for all development, plus adherence to the design guidelines and
standards detailed below and in Section 507 Tab A of the Zoning Ordinance.
***
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.
Page 615
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Resolution Adoption - General Plan Amendment GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 - Southwest
Corner of the 24th Street Alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive (Resolution
22030)
Request to hold a public hearing on a General Plan Amendment for the following item
to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and the related resolution if
approved. Request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map designation on 474.37
acres from Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre / Residential 1 to 2
dwelling units per acre, Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre /
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre, Preserves / Floodplain, and Infrastructure
Phasing Overlay to Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre and Preserves /
Floodplain, and removal of the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay. This is a companion
case to Z-75-18-2, Z-TA-5-18-2, and Z-62-18-2 and must be heard first, followed by Z-
75-18-2.
Summary
Application: GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
Current Designation: Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre /
Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre (138.83 acres), Preserves / Residential 2 to
3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre (312.30 acres),
Preserves / Floodplain (23.24 acres), and Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (474.37
acres)
Proposed Designation: Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre (451.13 acres),
Preserves / Floodplain (23.24 acres), and Infrastructure Phasing Overlay removal
(474.37 acres)
Acreage: 474.37 acres
Proposed Use: Amend the General Plan Land Use Map and remove the Infrastructure
Phasing Overlay to allow single-family residential development.
Owner: MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Applicant: Robert Johnson, Taylor Morrison/Arizona Inc.
Representative: Susan E. Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval.
Page 616
VPC Info: The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case on Dec. 7,
2021, for information only. The North Gateway Village Planning Committee heard this
case on Dec. 9, 2021, for information only.
VPC Action: The North Gateway Village Planning Committee heard this case on March
10, 2022 and recommended approval, by a vote of 4-1. The Desert View Village
Planning Committee heard this case on April 5, 2022 and recommended denial as
filed, approval with a modification, by a vote of 10-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on May 5, 2022 and
recommended approval, per Addendum A of the Staff Analysis Report, by a vote of 7-
1.
Location
Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive.
Council District: 2
Parcel Addresses: 28239 N. 23rd St.; and 28231, 28235, 28241, and 28245 N. 24th St.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 617
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION _____
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE
2015 GENERAL PLAN FOR PHOENIX, APPLICATION
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, CHANGING THE LAND USE
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN.
____________
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The 2015 Phoenix General Plan which was adopted by
Resolution No. 21307, is hereby amended by adopting GPA-DSTV-1-18-2. The
474.37-acre site located at the southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive is designated 451.13 acres of Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units
per acre and 23.24 acres of Preserves / Floodplain, with the removal of 474.37 acres
of Infrastructure Phasing Overlay.
SECTON 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the 2015 Phoenix General Plan to reflect this land use classification change as
shown below:
Page 618
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of June, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Page 619
Attachment B
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS
March 9, 2022
Application: GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
Owner: MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Applicant: Robert Johnson, Taylor Morrison
Representative: Susan E. Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham,
PLC
Location: Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment
and Sonoran Desert Drive
Acreage: 474.37 acres
Current Plan Designation: Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units
per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per
acre (138.83 acres), Preserves / Residential 2
to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5
to 5 dwelling units per acre (312.30 acres),
Preserves / Floodplain (23.24 acres),
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (474.37 acres)
Requested Plan Designation: Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre /
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre
(451.13 acres), Preserves / Floodplain (23.24
acres), Infrastructure Phasing Overlay removal
(474.37 acres)
Reason for Requested Change: Amend the General Plan Land Use Map and
remove the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay to
allow single-family residential development
North Gateway Village Planning March 10, 2022
Committee Meeting Date:
Page 620
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
Desert View Village Planning April 5, 2022
Committee Meeting Date:
Staff Recommendation: Approval
FINDINGS:
1) The companion rezoning case, Z-62-18-2, incorporates development
standards that will provide transition between the subject site and surrounding
Sonoran Preserve and open space areas.
2) The request will allow for single-family residential development at 3 dwelling
units per acre, as proposed by the companion rezoning case, Z-62-18-2. The
proposed development will provide a maximum of 1,420 single-family units,
which supports the City’s need for additional housing.
3) The parcel is one of the last privately owned properties in the area and as
recommended by the North Black Canyon Corridor Plan, property owners who
want to rezone a site within the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay area can file a
General Plan Amendment to remove the overlay designation from their
property.
BACKGROUND
The subject site is located approximately at the southwest corner of the 24th Street
alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive. The site is vacant and single-family residential
is currently permitted on the site. The site is currently zoned S-1 DCOD (Ranch or
Farm Residence, Desert Character Overlay District), S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence),
and RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family
Residence District, Desert Character
Overlay District), which permits
approximately 1 dwelling unit per acre.
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 proposes a minor
amendment to the General Plan Land
Use Map to allow single-family residential
development. The proposal will modify
the land use designation to Residential 2
to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential
3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and
Preserves / Floodplain. The companion
rezoning case, Z-62-18-2, proposes a
Planned Unit Development (PUD) to Aerial Map, Source: Gammage &
allow single-family development, not to Burnham
exceed a maximum of 1,420 dwelling
Page 621
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
units at an overall density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre. The proposed PUD
Development Narrative includes development, landscaping, and design standards that
exceed Zoning Ordinance standards and provide appropriate edge treatments for the
adjacent preserve areas.
The Peripheral Areas C and D Plan was
adopted in 1987 as an amendment to the
General Plan and provided direction
regarding land use planning within the
area bounded by Carefree Highway to the
north, the City of Scottsdale to the east,
the Central Arizona Project Canal and
Jomax Road to the south, and 67th
Avenue to the west. This alignment
bisected what is now known as the Verdin
property.
The plan identified the Northeast Outer
Loop freeway alignment, now known as Peripheral Areas C and D Plan Map,
the Sonoran Desert Drive alignment, was Source: City of Phoenix Planning and
intended to connect Interstate 17 with Development Department
Dynamite Boulevard alignment. The
alignment also acted as a dividing line
between lower density uses to the north
and higher density to the south.
In 2002 the City of Phoenix initiated the Sonoran Preserve Parkway Route Location
Study to determine an efficient east-west transportation corridor that would replace
the Northeast Outer Loop freeway. In 2004, the City amended the Street
Classification Map via GPA-CTYW-1-04, which realigned Sonoran Desert Drive to its
current alignment.
Page 622
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
The Infrastructure Limit Line and
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay were
adopted as part of the North Black
Canyon Corridor Plan. The Infrastructure
Limit Line acted as a guide to where the
sewer infrastructure to support
development. The Infrastructure Phasing
Overlay was intended to act as a timing
element to ensure infrastructure
supported growth was concentrated
within the Infrastructure Limit Line. Since
the plan’s adoption in 1999, significant
private investment and development has
Infrastructure Limit Line and Infrastructure
occurred within these boundaries,
Phasing Overlay Map, Source: City of
resulting in housing, commercial, and
Phoenix Planning and Development
employment uses within the North
Department
Gateway Village Core. With this
development water and sewer
infrastructure has also been installed in this area.
The North Black Canyon Corridor Plan also indicates that the City would not extend
infrastructure beyond the Infrastructure Limit Line until the growth corridor was
expanded or removed. The plan recommends that property owners who want to
rezone properties within the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay area can file a General
Plan Amendment to remove the overlay designation from their property. The
applicant’s request to remove the property from the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay will
allow for residential development on one of the only privately owned properties within
the overlay. Additionally, since most water and sewer infrastructure has been built
with the Infrastructure Limit Line, this provides an opportunity to revisit the overlay on
a case-by-case basis and reassess development beyond the limit line boundaries.
SURROUNDING LAND USES
The current General Plan Land Use Map designations for the site are Preserves /
Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre
(138.83 acres), Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential
3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre (312.30 acres), Preserves / Floodplain (23.24 acres),
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (474.37 acres).
Page 623
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
EXISTING PROPOSED
Existing and Proposed General Land Use Designation Maps, Source: City of Phoenix
Planning and Development Department
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 proposes to change the Land Use Map designations to Residential
2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre,
Preserves / Floodplain, and removal of the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay. The
request will retain the Preserves / Floodplain designation on the southeast portion of
the site. The remaining portion of the site will have the Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling
units per acre / 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre designation to accommodate the
proposed 1,420 single-family units. Staff is supportive of the request to remove the
Preserve designation because this is consistent with the private property owner’s
intent to develop the land at 3.0 dwelling units per acre.
NORTH
North of the northern boundary of the subject site is Sonoran Desert Drive and the
Sonoran Preserve. Sonoran Desert Drive is designated as a major arterial roadway
and is an important east-west alignment between Interstate 17 and northeast Phoenix.
This roadway alignment is proposed to have a total of six lanes, three in each
Page 624
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
direction. The Sonoran Preserve consists of over 9,600 acres of relatively
undisturbed natural areas in North Phoenix with various trail connectivity throughout.
Additionally, this area is owned by the Arizona State Land Department (ASLD). This
area is designated Future Parks/Open Space or 1 dwelling unit per acre.
EAST
East of the subject site is Cave Creek Wash and its associated floodplain. The
floodplain also encroaches onto the southeast portion of the subject site. This area
directly east of the subject site is designated Preserves/Floodplain.
SOUTH
South of the subject site is the Sonoran Preserve and Cave Buttes Recreation Area
designated as Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5
to 5 dwelling units per acre and Publicly Owned Parks/Open Space. The Cave Buttes
Recreation Area is a park that overseen by the Maricopa County Flood Control
District. This area contains a number of dams that control flooding from washes in the
general area. The PUD development narrative for the companion Rezoning Case No.
Z-62-18-2 contains standards which will provide open edge treatments adjacent to the
preserve and trail connection.
WEST
West of the subject site is the Sonoran Preserve designated Publicly Owned
Parks/Open Space and open space owned by the ASLD designated Future
Parks/Open Space or 1 dwelling unit per acre.
RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN CORE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES
CONNECT PEOPLE & PLACES CORE VALUE
• OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels
of increased intensity, respectful of local conditions and surrounding
neighborhoods.
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 will allow for a designation of Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling
units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre on the majority of
the site. As proposed in companion case, Z-62-19-2, the site will develop at
3.0 dwelling units per acre, incorporate open edge treatments, incorporate
various open space areas, and provide connectivity to the surrounding Sonoran
Preserve areas.
Page 625
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES & NEIGHBORHOODS
• DIVERSE NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Include a mix of
housing types and densities where appropriate within each village that
support a broad range of lifestyles.
The proposed General Plan Land Use Map amendment and concurrent
rezoning case will allow for single-family residential development options
adjacent to a major arterial street and in close proximity to the North Gateway
Core and Cave Creek Road. Additionally, the various lot sizes and single-
family housing products proposed in the companion rezoning case, Z-62-18-2,
will support a range of lifestyles for Phoenix residents.
• CERTAINTY & CHARACTER; DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Require appropriate
transitions/buffers between neighborhoods and adjacent uses.
The uses adjacent to the subject site are Cave Creek Wash, the Sonoran
Preserve, and various open space opportunities. As proposed in the
companion rezoning case, Z-62-18-2, the development will provide open edge
treatments to provide a natural transition between the single-family
development and the adjacent open space.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, as Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling
units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre, Preserves / Floodplain,
and Infrastructure Phasing Overlay removal.
This General Plan Amendment request and concurrent case Z-62-18-2 will allow
single-family residential development, not to exceed 1,420 units. Staff supports
removal of the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay and designation change to Residential
2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre, to allow
development at a density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre. Additionally, where the
floodplain encroaches onto the site, the Preserves / Floodplain designation will be
retained. The request will align with a land use designation that is respectful of the
adjacent Sonoran Preserve, while also being adjacent to a major arterial.
Writer
Julianna Pierre
March 9, 2022
Team Leader
Samantha Keating
Page 626
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
Exhibits
Sketch Maps (2 pages)
Page 627
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 ACRES: 474.37 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Desert View COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 3/08/2022
APPLICANT: Robert Johnson-Taylor Morrison/Arizona Inc.
EXISTING:
Preserves / 0 to 1 or 1 to 2 du/ac ( 138.83 +/- Acres)
Preserves / 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 312.30 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Floodplain ( 23.24 +/- Acres)
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay ( 474.37 +/- Acres)
SONORAN DESERT DR
Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 5 du/ac
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned
Parks/Open Space - Future 1 du/ac
Preserves / 0 to 1 or 1 to 2 du/ac
Preserves / 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac
Preserves / Floodplain
Maricopa County Assessor's Office
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 451.13 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Floodplain ( 23.24 +/- Acres)
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay Removal
( 474.37 +/- Acres)
SONORAN DESERT DR
Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac
Preserves / Floodplain
Page 628
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-DSTV-1-18-2_BW ACRES: 474.37 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Desert View COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 3/08/2022
APPLICANT: Robert Johnson-Taylor Morrison/Arizona Inc.
EXISTING:
Preserves / 0 to 1 or 1 to 2 du/ac ( 138.83 +/- Acres)
Preserves / 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 312.30 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Floodplain ( 23.24 +/- Acres)
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay ( 474.37 +/- Acres)
SONORAN DESERT DR
Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 5 du/acre
E E E E E
E E E E E
E E E E E
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned
E E E E E
E E E E E
E E E E E
Parks/Open Space - Future 1 du
E E E E E
Preserves / 0-1 or 1-2 du/ acre
Preserves / 2-3.5 or 3.5-5 du/acre
Preserves / Floodplain
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 451.13 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Floodplain ( 23.24 +/- Acres)
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay Removal
( 474.37 +/- Acres)
SONORAN DESERT DR
Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/acre
Preserves / Floodplain
Page 629
Attachment C
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting December 9, 2021
Request From Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 or 1 to 2 dwelling units per
acre, Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre, and Preserves / Floodplain
Request To Residential 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre,
Preserves / Floodplain, and removal of the Infrastructure
Phasing Overlay
Proposed Use Single-family Residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #4 – Information Only – Z-62-18-2, Item #5
– Information Only – Z-TA-5-18-2, and Item #6 – Information Only – Z-75-18-2.
Committee member Julie Read arrived to the meeting during this item, bringing the
quorum to 5 members.
3 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve, will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes per
acre, and will have 7 miles of trails and community paths. She discussed the
application requests to rezone to PUD, amend the General Plan, and amend the Desert
Character Overlay District. She also discussed the extension and build out of Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt also discussed the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife
Federation (NWF). She discussed the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. She noted the NWF landscape palette, pedestrian
circulation, and open edge plan.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 630
Vice Chair Shannon Simon asked about the timeline for constructing Sonoran Desert
Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that the buildout for Sonoran Desert Drive will cost
approximately $120 million and there is no defined timeline. She stated that the
development will complete a Traffic Impact Study to determine the level of service and
the necessary improvements.
Committee member Michelle Ricart asked whether the applicant reached out to the
school district. Susan Demmitt stated that they are working with the school district on
a donation agreement. She added that there will be no modifications to the boundaries
of the school district and students living in the development will be within the boundary
of Desert Mountain schools.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, expressed concerns with
removal of the Desert Character Overlay. He stated that areas adjacent to preserve
areas should be low density. He also expressed concerns regarding increased traffic.
Paul Grayczyk, president of the Sonoran Gate Home Owner’s Association, encouraged
larger setbacks from Sonoran Desert Drive.
Bob Thompson, a member of the public, stated that the beauty of the area should be
maintained. He added that the developer should honor the Desert Character Overlay
and keep the preserve areas as is.
Susan Demmitt stated that she had no additional comments or responses at this time,
but will continue dialogue with the community going forward.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 631
Attachment D
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting December 7, 2021
Request From Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 or 1 to 2 dwelling units per
acre, Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre, and Preserves / Floodplain
Request To Residential 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre,
Preserves / Floodplain, and removal of the Infrastructure
Phasing Overlay
Proposed Use Single-family Residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC DISCUSSION:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #4 – Information Only – Z-62-18-2, Item #5
– Information Only – Z-TA-5-18-2, and Item #6 – Information Only – Z-75-18-2.
Committee member Reginal Younger arrived to the meeting and Committee member
Jason Israel left the meeting during this item, bringing the quorum to 11 members.
10 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve, will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes per
acre, and will have 7 miles of trails and community paths. She discussed the
application requests to rezone to PUD, amend the General Plan, and amend the Desert
Character Overlay District. She also discussed the extension and build out of Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt also discussed the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife
Federation (NWF). She discussed the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. She noted the NWF landscape palette, pedestrian
circulation, and open edge plan.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave asked about the cost of the extension of Sonoran Desert
Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that Verdin’s contribution will only be for a portion of the
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 632
extension. She stated that as other developers build along Sonoran Desert Drive they
will have their own contribution requirements.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that the North Land Use Plan should be considered in
addition to the General Plan. He stated that the developer should consider building less
than 1000 units. He added that the development will generate traffic and overload
schools. Susan Demmitt stated that the development will have a maximum of 3 units
per acre, which is consistent with developments adjacent to the preserve. She stated
that they are in discussion with the Deer Valley School District and the development is
within the boundary for Desert Mountain schools, which have capacity. She stated that
Cave Creek schools also have capacity.
Committee member Rick Nowell asked about traffic lights on Sonoran Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt stated that a traffic study is being completed and that there will most
likely be a traffic signal at the main entrance of the development in the future.
Committee member Rick Nowell stated that he had concerns that the project has
returned after a couple years, but not decreased the density.
Committee member Rick Powell asked about the cost of the extension of Sonoran
Desert Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that the cost estimate for the full extension of
Sonoran Desert Drive is approximately $120 million. She stated that the build out will
take place when the traffic demand exists and the funding is available. Committee
member Rick Powell stated that the development is not in line with the character of the
area.
Committee member Reginald Younger asked how close homes will be to Sonoran
Desert Drive. Susan Demmitt stated the development’s property line is adjacent to
Sonoran Desert Drive, but the site will have landscape buffers. Committee member
Reginald Younger stated that he is hoping for less density on site.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that the Desert View Character Plan should also be
take into account and to meet the character of the area, density should be decreased or
the development proposal be moved closer to the core. He added that Desert Mountain
and Cave Creek schools are too far from the development.
Committee member Jill Hankins asked if a flood analysis had been completed for the
site. Susan Demmitt stated that the site is not proposing development in the
established flood corridor or flood zone. Nguyen Lam, representative with Hilgart
Wilson, stated that the drainage corridors have mapped floodplains and are subject to
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). He added that the developer will
work with the City to appropriately address the flood zones. Committee member Jill
Hankins stated that she had concerns with additional hardscape in the area.
Committee member Michelle Santoro stated that she appreciates the design, open
space, and connectivity proposed by the development.
Daniel Centilli, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve and various trail running
groups, stated that developers see the area as a transportation corridor, but residents
see it as a recreation corridor. He added that the development will reduce quality of life.
He stated that other residential projects in the area have increased trash and traffic.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 633
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, stated that he appreciated the
partnership with the NWF and proposed trails and access. He added that the Desert
Character Overlay is tied to the preserve and should be retained.
Sue Pierce, a resident of Desert Enclave, stated that the area is exploding with
development, especially with the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company
(TSMC), but residential development will lead to increased traffic. She stated that traffic
issues are already complicated in the area and there is no plan from the development
about how to alleviate the issue. She added that major transportation will lead to
additional noise pollution. She stated that there is an opportunity to preserve the area
as a tranquil space in the Sonoran Preserve.
Susanne Rothwell, a member of the Phoenix Mountain Preservation Council,
expressed concerns regarding amending the Desert Character Overlay. She added
that the developer should keep 50% of the land as native and homes should be low
scale. She also expressed concerns with the lack of parking if a trailhead is provided on
site.
James Gaston, a resident of Tuscana at Tatum Ranch, questioned how the
development will deal with increases in water and sewer usage.
Bob Thompson, a member of the public, stated that he was opposed to the
development and instead wanted to preserve the area as natural preserve. He also
expressed concerns with traffic and density.
Scott Coll, a member of the public, expressed concerns with traffic. He added that
there is a need to preserve the preserve area.
Crystal Lehman, a member of the public, stated that Sonoran Desert Drive is a
pleasant driving experience as is and expanding the roadway and increasing homes
takes away from the beauty of the desert.
Rebecca Rodriguez, a local hiker, trail runner, and mountain biker, stated that she
enjoys the beautiful views and wildlife in the area. She expressed concerns with
increased noise from the roadway.
Paul Grayczyk, president of the Sonoran Gate Home Owner’s Association, stated the
he understands the area will develop eventually, but expressed concerns with density
and traffic. He added that the development should be set back further from Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt stated that she had no additional comments or responses at this time,
but will continue dialogue with the community going forward.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that Sonoran Desert Drive will increase to 6 lanes,
but that does not mean that the preserve area cannot be preserved. Committee
member Jill Hankins also expressed the need to retain open spaces in the City.
Committee member Rick Powell stated that he believes development should be
slower and the area kept more natural.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 634
Committee member Reginald Younger stated that he likes the look of Sonoran Desert
Drive as is and hopes that development will allow that to be retained. He also
expressed concerns with increased density.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 635
Attachment E
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
Date of VPC Meeting March 10, 2022
Request From Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 / Residential 1 to 2
dwelling units per acre, Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 /
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre, and
Preserves / Floodplain
Request To Residential 2 to 3.5 / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units
per acre, Preserves / Floodplain, and removal of the
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC Recommendation Approval
VPC Vote 4-1
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #4 – Z-TA-5-18-2, Item #5 – Z-75-18-2, and
Item #7 – Z-62-18-2.
10 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Julianna Pierre provided information regarding Z-TA-5-18-2, a text amendment to
revise the applicability area and associated text for the Desert Maintenance Overlay
District (DMOD) of the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD). She explained the
permitted uses and standards for the two sub-districts in the DMOD, Sub-District A and
Sub-District B. She explained that the southern boundary of the DMOD aligns with the
Northeast Outerloop Freeway alignment outlined in the Peripheral Areas C and D Plan.
Julianna Pierre explained that applicant’s proposed modifications would remove Sub-
District A standards from the property south of Sonoran Desert Drive and west of Cave
Creek Wash. Additionally, the land south of Sonoran Desert Drive and east of Cave
Creek Wash, currently in Sub-District A, would become part of Sub-District B. She
stated that staff’s recommendation is to only remove Sub-District A standards from an
approximately 155.06-acre portion of the original request. She added that the text
amendment also includes changes to the Zoning Ordinance and the staff
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 636
recommendation is for approval of Z-TA-5-18-2 to amend the applicability area and
associated text for the DMOD of the DCOD as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report.
Julianna Pierre explained that Z-75-18-2 is the rezoning case associated with the
aforementioned text amendment and would remove the DCOD designation from the
zoning districts. She explained that the applicant proposed and staff recommended
areas were identical to those in Z-TA-5-18-2, but the staff recommendation for Z-75-18-
2 is denial as filed, approval of the staff recommended area.
Julianna Pierre explained that GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 was a request from Preserves /
Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre,
Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre, and Preserves / Floodplain to Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre
/ Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Preserves / Floodplain, with removal of
the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (IPO). She explained that the IPO acted as a timing
element to ensure growth was concentrated within the Infrastructure Limit Line (ILL), a
guide to where the City would extend water and sewer infrastructure to support
development. She stated that significant investment and development has occurred
within the boundaries of the ILL and there are opportunities to revisit the overlay and
reassess development beyond the ILL. She added that staff is recommending approval
of GPA-DSTV-1-18-2.
Julianna Pierre stated that Z-62-18-2 is a rezoning request of 488.63 acres at the
southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive from S-1
DCOD, S-1, and RE-35 DCOD to PUD DCOD (pending PUD) and PUD. She added
that the proposed PUD will allow single-family residential development.
Julianna Pierre stated that the development is proposing a master-planned residential
community with a maximum 1,420 units at a density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre.
There will be a collection of single-family neighborhoods with various amenities, open
spaces, and a pedestrian network. She also discussed the permitted uses, connectivity
to the adjacent Sonoran Preserve, open space, and amenities.
Julianna Pierre reviewed the community input received since 2018, which included 82
letters in opposition and 6 letters in support. She stated that the letters in opposition
expressed concerns regarding: road infrastructure, increased traffic, decreased resident
safety, preserve areas not maintained for outdoor activities, negative impacts on the
area’s natural flora and fauna, maintaining the requirements for the DCOD, density,
number of units, water resources, Sonoran Desert Drive remaining a scenic corridor, the
proposed development not matching the character of the area, strain on the school
district, and lack of amenities to support the development.
Julianna Pierre reviewed the staff finding and stipulations for Z-62-18-2, noting that
Stipulation No. 1 had corrections to the PUD name and date stamped date. She added
that staff recommended approval, subject to stipulations.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve and will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes
per acre. She discussed the history of applicable plans that apply to the site, such as
the DMCO, Peripheral Areas C and D Plan, and Phoenix General Plan. She explained
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 637
that the Verdin property was always intended to develop as residential. She also
discussed the eventual build out of Sonoran Desert Drive and the infrastructure
improvements that Verdin developers will build along Sonoran Desert Drive. She also
noted that developers are working with the Deer Valley Unified School District.
Alex Steadman, representative with RVi, stated that the Verdin development will have
a unique vision and design approach. He discussed the partnership with the National
Wildlife Federation (NWF), noting the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. He discussed the certified habitat open space areas,
specifically the preserved habitat, re-established habitat, and maintained open space.
He stated that the playscapes will include nature trails with education nodes, parks,
trailheads, informative signage, and community amenities. He also provided an
example of the NWF landscape palette.
Alex Steadman also discussed the pedestrian circulation and edge openness plans.
He stated that the development will have an open trailhead for the public, which
includes public parking, community gathering spaces, and access to water. He added
that there will be a variable edge adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve and Mesquite Wash.
He also noted that the Verdin PUD provides parallels to the DCOD.
Vice Chair Shannon Simon appreciated the thoughtful design of the development and
stated that the project was high quality.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, provided a presentation and
discussed the importance of the DCOD. He stated that the DCOD was intended to
maintain the fragile undisturbed areas of the wildlife corridor along the Cave Creek
Wash, a major floodway and floodplain. He added that the Zoning Ordinance discusses
how development in the DCOD should blend with the undisturbed desert environment
rather than dominate it. He added the DCOD states that the Dynamite Boulevard
alignment acts as the southern boundary, and makes no reference to Sonoran Desert
Drive. He added that moving the DCOD boundary further north eliminates the purpose
of the overlay.
Patrick McMullen, President of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council,
appreciated the applicant linking the development to the Sonoran Preserve, but still had
concerns regarding removal of the DCOD, especially when the DCOD would dictate the
number of units permitted on the site. He also expressed concerns regarding the width
of the trail along the Mesquite Wash.
Susanne Rothwell, a member of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, stated
that the Sonoran Collaborative assisted with writing the DCOD chapter of the Zoning
Ordinance and there was an enormous amount of research regarding the fragile
corridors in the area. She requested lower density and single-story residences. She
added that DCOD should remain in place.
Ann Wilde, a member of the public, stated that development should not affect the
desert character. She stated that development should occur with the DCOD in place.
Cynthia Weiss, a resident of Sonoran Gate, the closest residential development to
Verdin, appreciated Verdin’s thoughtful development.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 638
Kara Nicholls, a member of the public who lives adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve,
stated that she was excited about Verdin providing a connection to the northern and
southern portions of the Preserve. She appreciated the NWF collaboration and stated
this development will aid in home ownership since homes on an acre are unobtainable
for many.
Rob Nash-Boulden, a member of the public, asked the Village Planning Committee to
reconsider and deny the request to remove the DCOD from the site. He stated that the
DCOD should be retained. He also expressed concern that the development will be
built with no close connections to services.
Robert Thompson, a member of the public, disagreed with the change in zoning.
Jennifer Ruby, a member of the public, stated that Verdin will be a vibrant place for
people to live. She noted that the project is low density and thoughtful with accessible
housing.
Keeli Keeler, a member of the public, stated that the DCOD should remain in place and
that the proposed number of units will change the desert character.
Susan Demmitt stated that standards outlined in the DCOD have been taken into
account and worked into the Verdin project. She added that the land adjacent to
Sonoran Desert Drive is expected to develop in the future and Verdin will act as a
precedent for what’s to come.
MOTION: Committee member Daniel Tome made a motion to approve GPA-DSTV-1-
18-2. The motion was seconded by Committee member Michelle Ricart.
VOTE: 4-1 with Committee members Simon, Kreiger, Ricart, and Tome in favor and
Chair Stokes in opposition.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 639
Attachment F
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
Date of VPC Meeting April 5, 2022
Request From Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 / Residential 1 to 2
dwelling units per acre, Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 /
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre, and
Preserves / Floodplain
Request To Residential 2 to 3.5 / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units
per acre, Preserves / Floodplain, and removal of the
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC Recommendation Denial as filed, approved with a modification
VPC Vote 10-1
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
Cases Z-TA-5-18-2, Z-75-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, and Z-62-18-2 were heard
concurrently.
Five requests to speak in favor and five requests to speak in opposition were made for
this request.
Committee member Reginald Younger joined during this item, bringing quorum to 10.
Committee member Jill Hankins joined during this item, bringing quorum to 11.
Committee member Mark Warren joined during this item, bringing quorum to 12.
Committee member Reginald Younger left during this item, bringing quorum to 11.
Staff Presentation
Julianna Pierre, staff, provided a combined presentation for companion cases Z-TA-5-
18-2, Z-75-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, and Z-62-18-2. Ms. Pierre reviewed the history of
the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD) and the alignment of Sonoran Desert
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 640
Drive. She explained that staff recommends a more limited area to be removed from the
DOCD, as shown on the map in the staff report. She explained that the Z-75-18-2 case
mirrors the text amendment case, updating the zoning designation to remove the
overlay district, and that staff recommends denial as filed, approval of the staff
recommended area. Ms. Pierre went on to review the General Plan Amendment,
describing the history and purpose of the designations, noting that staff recommends
approval. She then provided an overview of the PUD proposal in Rezoning Case Z-62-
18-2, reviewing the land use proposal and site plan, connectivity proposal, open space
provisions, and amenities. She discussed the community input that has been received
and summarized written materials. Finally, she noted that staff recommends approval
with stipulations.
Applicant Presentation
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, summarized the history of
the site and planning efforts for the proposed project. She stated that the subject site is
private property and has never been designated to be part of a preserve area. She
reviewed the surrounding area, summarized the applicant’s proposal, and discussed
new proposed stipulations that she suggested the committee incorporate into its
approval. She summarized the purpose of the Desert Character Overlay District and
stated that the impact of removing the overlay would allow a master planned community
with density spread to the whole site.
Alex Stedman, representative with RVi, discussed the design approach and
relationship to the surrounding open space, including the partnership with the National
Wildlife Federation. He shared a map that indicated the proposed certified habitat open
spaces within the site, discussed the proposed landscape palette and plant list, and
stated that the Mesquite Wash would serve as a connector between the north and south
portions of the preserve. He reviewed the edge openness plan and the design of open
edges with public trail access points. Finally, he described the elements of the DCOD
that have been incorporated into the design of the development.
Susan Demmitt described the additional stipulations – which include a reduced density
limit, elimination of the smallest lot size, an additional open space buffer along the
eastern property line, public access easements at certain locations, and a multi-use trail
easement along the wash corridor – proposed by the applicant and requested that the
committee incorporate the additional stipulations into their approval. Additionally, she
stated that the subject site has always been designated for development in the City’s
General Plan and the proposed density is within the limits of the designation and that
the applicant hopes to set a good example of appropriate development in this corridor.
Committee Questions
Vice Chair Lagrave asked about the designation of 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre in
the General Plan Amendment, which is not necessary to facilitate the proposed project.
He further asked about the southeast corner and if it would make sense to donate the
land to the Parks and Recreation Department.
Susan Demmitt replied that the applicant would be open to removing the General Plan
classification of 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and that the applicant would be willing to
work with the Parks and Recreation Department on a dedication of the southeast corner
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 641
of the site if it was of interest to the City.
Committee Member Nowell asked about the development parcel allocation table in
which the numbers for individual parcels do not add up to the total for the full site. Ms.
Demmitt replied that the individual parcels have flexibility in the unit totals, but the
overall total cannot exceed the maximum for the full site.
Mr. Nowell asked if homeowners would be prohibited from planting non-native plants.
Mr. Stedman replied that individual homeowners would be required to follow the plant
list for the PUD. Committee Member Reynolds added that rear yard plant prohibitions
are possible and are done in other communities, asking further if fruit trees will be
prohibited in the community. Mr. Stedman replied that the applicant team would explore
the idea.
Mr. Nowell asked how many lots would be affected by the base flood elevation and how
much those houses would need to be elevated.
Nguyen Lam, representative with Hilgart Wilson, replied that it would primarily be lots
fronting on the Mesquite Wash, but they don’t have a precise number since the parcels
haven’t been finalized. He added that they would raise the houses to 1 foot above the
base flood elevation.
Ms. Reynolds asked if the natural preservation areas will be marked so the community
knows where they are. Mr. Stedman replied that they have discussed signage with the
NWF and there are opportunities to do signage. Ms. Demmitt added that the applicant
wants the public to recognize that these are public benefits.
Committee Member Kollar asked for clarification on the DCOD removal area. Ms.
Pierre replied that staff is recommending only the Verdin site be removed from the
DCOD at this time and any other sites would need to be evaluated on a case-by-case
basis. Ms. Demmitt added that the package of commitments from the specific PUD
justifies the removal of the DCOD.
Mr. Nowell asked for clarification on making motions with amendments. Vice Chair
Lagrave replied that the committee can make the appropriate amendments in their
motions.
Public Comments
Gary Kirkilas introduced himself and provided a history of the DCOD, noting that its
purpose was to maintain the Cave Creek Wash. He stated that the entire Cave Creek
Wash needs to be protected and that the DCOD boundaries should be at the Dynamite
Boulevard alignment, not moved to the north. He further stated that DCOD only applies
to one-third of the property, allowing the developer to build on the site without removing
the DCOD. He stated that he believes the committee should vote yes on development
but keep the DCOD in place.
Donald Bessler introduced himself and stated that he believes this is a property rights
issue and that more housing should be built, adding that he supports the proposal and
believes it will be a good product.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 642
Susanne Rothwell introduced herself and stated that the Desert View Village Planning
Committee voted in favor of the DCOD when it was originally written. She stated that
everyone was in favor of it at the time and it was a great piece of planning and
legislation.
Brian Sullivan introduced himself, noting that he has worked and spent much time in
the preserve area, and stated that there are maps that show this area designated for
acquisition and preservation. He stated that minimizing density would limit the impact to
wildlife and that preserving the flats is important.
Sue Pierce introduced herself and stated the concern that the work that goes into
making plans can be easily reversed by a developer who doesn’t have a full
understanding of the issues.
Kara Nicholls introduced herself and stated that Phoenix needs attainable housing
because of its rapid growth rate. She noted that people are having trouble finding
homes in the area and that the developer has done a great job with the proposed
development.
Jennifer Ruby introduced herself and stated that the proposed development is a great
opportunity for the community and that it would provide housing for all the new jobs
coming to the north Phoenix area.
Cynthia Weiss introduced herself and stated that she supports the proposal because
there are other active families that want to live in this location near all of the open space
amenities.
James Gaston introduced himself and stated that he does not agree with removing the
DCOD and believes one home per acre is appropriate. He further noted that there is
academic research, stating concerns about groundwater issues in regard to
overdevelopment.
Sara Altieri introduced herself and stated that she knew the area would change over
time when she bought a home nearby. She stated that the development incorporates
sensitivity to natural wildlife.
Applicant Response
Susan Demmitt stated that she feels the applicant has addressed the concerns and
would be happy to discuss any follow up questions.
Committee Discussion
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that he was originally in favor of the R1-10 designation and
that he is concerned about keeping the DCOD in the northern portion because it would
push more density into the southern portion. He stated that he believes the
development will allow wildlife to flourish and that he supports the project.
Committee Member Israel asked if there is a current allowance for housing on the site.
Vice Chair Lagrave replied that there is.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 643
Committee Member Powell stated that this site is far from the 101 and I-17 freeways
and should be the lowest density. He stated the concern about other sites along the
corridor seeking higher densities, adding that he doesn’t believe the request is in
character and is not in favor of moving the DCOD line. He further stated that the homes
in this development will not be affordable or attainable and that there is room in other
parts of the village that could be developed at higher densities, closer to the freeway.
Committee Member Santoro stated that the PUD is very thorough and thoughtful and
that she appreciates the reduction in density. She stated that she does not agree with
the current alignment of the DCOD line and that the majority of the property is in
alignment with the DCOD guidelines.
Committee Member Nowell stated that he believes the proposal is a good
compromise, even though it is not perfect, adding that he would like to see the approved
plant include particular restrictions in the back yards of individual homes.
Chair Bowser stated that it is important to remember that the proposal is to eliminate
the DCOD at the site in exchange for an entire new set of rules outlined in the PUD. He
further stated that one house per acre is not a desirable type of development, noting the
downsides to one-acre lot development, including that it’s not walkable and people do
not know their neighbors.
Committee Member Hankins stated that she would be in favor of the development if it
were closer to existing infrastructure and that she is concerned about the costs of
infrastructure driving up home prices.
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that affordable housing is typically found in other parts of the
city and that he believes that infrastructure costs will be lower for future developments.
MOTION – GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
Vice Chair Lagrave made a motion to deny GPA-GSTV-1-18-2 as filed, and approve
with the Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre designation removed. Committee
Member Santoro seconded the motion.
VOTE
10-1, motion to deny as filed, approve as modified, passed; Members Dean, Hankins,
Israel, Kollar, Nowell, Reynolds, Santoro, Warren, Lagrave, and Bowser in favor;
Member Powell against.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 644
Attachment G
ADDENDUM A
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
STAFF ANALYSIS
April 26, 2022
Application: GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
Owner: MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Applicant: Robert Johnson, Taylor Morrison
Representative: Susan E. Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham,
PLC
Location: Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment
and Sonoran Desert Drive
Acreage: 474.37 acres
Current Plan Designation: Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units
per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per
acre (138.83 acres), Preserves / Residential 2
to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5
to 5 dwelling units per acre (312.30 acres),
Preserves / Floodplain (23.24 acres),
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (474.37 acres)
Requested Plan Designation: Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre
(451.13 acres), Preserves / Floodplain (23.24
acres), Infrastructure Phasing Overlay removal
(474.37 acres)
Reason for Requested Change: Amend the General Plan Land Use Map and
remove the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay to
allow single-family residential development
North Gateway Village Planning March 10, 2022
Committee Meeting Date:
Desert View Village Planning April 5, 2022
Committee Meeting Date:
Page 645
Addendum A to the Staff Analysis GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
April 26, 2022
Staff Recommendation: Approval, per Addendum A
Summary
The North Gateway Village Planning Committee (VPC) heard this request on March 10,
2022, and recommended approval by a 4-1 vote. The Desert View VPC heard this
request on April 5, 2022, and recommended denial as filed, approval with a modification
to remove the Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre designation.
The applicant’s original request was for 451.13 acres of the subject site to be
designated as Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre/Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre, along with other requested designations. The applicant proposes to
modify their request to remove the Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre
designation, per the Desert View Village Planning Committee recommendation.
Updated sketch maps are attached to reflect this change.
Conclusion and Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 per Addendum A.
Exhibits
Sketch Map (2 pages)
Page 646
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 ACRES: 474.37 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Desert View COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 3/08/2022
APPLICANT: Robert Johnson-Taylor Morrison/Arizona Inc. 4/14/2022
EXISTING:
Preserves / 0 to 1 or 1 to 2 du/ac ( 138.83 +/- Acres)
Preserves / 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 312.30 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Floodplain ( 23.24 +/- Acres)
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay ( 474.37 +/- Acres)
SONORAN DESERT DR
Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 5 du/ac
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned
Parks/Open Space - Future 1 du/ac
Preserves / 0 to 1 or 1 to 2 du/ac
Preserves / 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac
Preserves / Floodplain
Maricopa County Assessor's Office
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac ( 451.13 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Floodplain ( 23.24 +/- Acres)
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay Removal
( 474.37 +/- Acres)
SONORAN DESERT DR
Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac
Preserves / Floodplain
Page 647
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-DSTV-1-18-2_BW ACRES: 474.37 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Desert View COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 3/08/2022
APPLICANT: Robert Johnson-Taylor Morrison/Arizona Inc. 4/14/2022
EXISTING:
Preserves / 0 to 1 or 1 to 2 du/ac ( 138.83 +/- Acres)
Preserves / 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 312.30 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Floodplain ( 23.24 +/- Acres)
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay ( 474.37 +/- Acres)
SONORAN DESERT DR
Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 5 du/acre
E E E E E
E E E E E
E E E E E
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned
E E E E E
E E E E E
E E E E E
Parks/Open Space - Future 1 du
E E E E E
Preserves / 0-1 or 1-2 du/ acre
Preserves / 2-3.5 or 3.5-5 du/acre
Preserves / Floodplain
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac ( 451.13 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Floodplain ( 23.24 +/- Acres)
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay Removal
( 474.37 +/- Acres)
SONORAN DESERT DR
Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/acre
Preserves / Floodplain
Page 648
Attachment H
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
May 5, 2022
ITEM NO: 5
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:
Application #: GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 (Companion Cases Z-75-18-2, Z-TA-5-18-2, and Z-62-
18-2)
Request: Map Amendment
Location: Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive
From: Preserves/Residential 0 to 1/Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre,
Preserves/Residential 2 to 3.5/Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre,
and Preserves/Floodplain; and Infrastructure Phasing Overlay
To: Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre and Preserves/Floodplain, and
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay removal
Acreage: 474.37
Proposal: Amend the General Plan Land Use Map and remove the Infrastructure
Phasing Overlay to allow single-family residential development.
Applicant: Robert Johnson, Taylor Morrison/Arizona Inc.
Owner: MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Representative: Susan E. Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Approval.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Desert View 12/7/2021 Information only.
North Gateway 12/9/2021 Information only.
North Gateway 3/10/2022 Approval. Vote: 4-1.
Desert View 4/5/2022 Denied as filed, approved with modifications. Vote: 10-1.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per Addendum A of the Staff Analysis
Report.
Motion Discussion: N/A
Motion details: Commissioner Simon made a MOTION to approve GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, per
Addendum A of the Staff Analysis Report.
Maker: Simon
Second: Gorraiz
Vote: 7-1 (Perez)
Absent: Gaynor
Opposition Present: Yes
Findings:
1. The companion rezoning case, Z-62-18-2, incorporates development
standards that will provide transition between the subject site and surrounding
Sonoran Preserve and open space areas.
Page 649
2. The request will allow for single-family residential development at 3 dwelling
units per acre, as proposed by the companion rezoning case, Z-62-18-2. The
proposed development will provide a maximum of 1,420 single-family units,
which supports the City’s need for additional housing.
3. The parcel is one of the last privately owned properties in the area and as
recommended by the North Black Canyon Corridor Plan, property owners who
want to rezone a site within the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay area can file a
General Plan Amendment to remove the overlay designation from their
property.
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.
Page 650
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-75-18-2 - South of Sonoran Desert
Drive between the 16th Street and 32nd Street Alignments (Ordinance G-6992)
Request to hold a public hearing and amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section
601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-75-18-
2 and rezone the site from RE-35 DCOD-A (Single-Family Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District, Sub-District A) and S-1 DCOD-A (Ranch or Farm
Residence, Desert Character Overlay District, Sub-District A) to RE-35 (Single-Family
Residence District) and S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence) to allow single-family
residential. This is a companion case to GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, Z-TA-5-18-2, and Z-62-18-
2 and must be heard following GPA-DSTV-1-18-2.
Summary
Current Zoning: RE-35 DCOD-A (10.25 acres) and S-1 DCOD-A (144.81 acres)
Proposed Zoning: RE-35 (10.25 acres) and S-1 (144.81 acres)
Acreage: Approximately 155.06 acres
Proposed Use: Modify the boundary of the Desert Character Overlay District to remove
a portion from Sub-District A
Owner: MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Applicant: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Representative: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Denial as filed, approval of the staff recommended area in Z-
TA-5-18-2.
VPC Info: The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case on Nov. 6,
2018, April 2, 2019, and Dec. 7, 2021, for information only. The North Gateway Village
Planning Committee heard this case on Nov. 8, 2018 and Dec. 9, 2021, for information
only.
VPC Action: The North Gateway Village Planning Committee heard this case on March
10, 2022 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 4-1.
The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case on April 5, 2022 and
recommended denial as filed, approval per the staff recommendation, by a 7-4 vote.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on May 5, 2022 and
Page 651
recommended approval, per the Addendum A Staff Report, by a vote of 7-1.
Location
Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive.
Council District: 2
Parcel Address: 28239 N. 23rd St.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 652
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(CASE Z-75-18-2) FROM RE-35 DCOD-A (SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT, DESERT CHARACTER OVERLAY
DISTRICT, SUBDISTRICT A) AND S-1 DCOD-A (RANCH OR
FARM RESIDENCE DISTRICT, DESERT CHARACTER OVERLAY
DISTRICT, SUB-DISTRICT A) TO RE-35 (SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT) AND S-1 (RANCH OR FARM
RESIDENCE).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of approximately 155.06 acres located at the
southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive in a portion of
Section 22, Township 5 North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit
“A”, is hereby changed from 10.25 acres of “RE-35 DCOD-A” (Single-Family Residence
District, Desert Character Overlay District, Subdistrict A) and 144.81 acres of “S-1
DCOD-A” (Ranch or Farm Residence District, Desert Character Overlay District, Sub-
District A) to 10.25 acres of “RE-35” (Single-Family Residence District) and 144.81 acres
of “S-1” (Ranch or Farm Residence District).
Page 653
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B”.
SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion
of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of June, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_____________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
Page 654
A – Legal Description (3 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 655
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-75-18-2
A parcel of land being situated within a portion of Township 5 North, Range 3 and 4 East
of the Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, being more particularly
described as follows:
BEGINNING at the Southeast corner of Section 3, Township 5 North, Range 3 East of
the Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona;
Thence North 89°52'51" East, 11908.90 feet;
Thence South 00°59'40" West, 2657.90 feet;
Thence South 89°26'27" West, 1274.34 feet;
Thence South 00°17'01" West, 6593.46 feet;
Thence South 01°35'31" East, 6542.03 feet;
Thence South 86°57'51" East, 1315.88 feet;
Thence South 26°41'09" West, 2996.00 feet;
Thence North 65°42'18" West, 2174.55 feet;
Thence South 26°52'29" West, 2037.98 feet;
Thence South 67°49'59" East, 2208.25 feet;
Thence South 27°25'16" West, 3791.32 feet;
Thence South 27°25'16" West, 4944.99 feet;
Thence North 00°29'51" West, 1565.18 feet;
Thence South 89°11'28" West, 1292.60 feet;
Thence North 45°35'29" West, 890.47 feet;
Thence North 01°52'41" West, 792.36 feet;
Thence North 46°04'52" West, 973.22 feet;
Thence North 87°16'35" West, 545.87 feet;
Page 656
Thence North 00°33'20" West, 1337.25 feet;
Thence South 44°27'13" West, 963.92 feet;
Thence South 00°00'00" East, 415.44 feet;
Thence South 87°27'28" West, 584.79 feet;
Thence North 06°34'52" West, 339.74 feet;
Thence North 87°39'34" West, 636.66 feet;
Thence North 49°23'55" West, 837.83 feet;
Thence North 85°02'08" East, 299.72 feet;
Thence North 00°00'00" East, 701.00 feet;
Thence South 88°51'30" East, 649.25 feet;
Thence North 00°34'05" West, 1311.25 feet;
Thence North 89°16'58" West, 1038.64 feet;
Thence North 01°08'41" East, 649.19 feet;
Thence North 90°00'00" East, 701.03 feet;
Thence North 43°21'40" West, 964.27 feet;
Thence North 31°19'02" East, 893.05 feet;
Thence North 24°55'42" East, 990.40 feet;
Thence North 44°36'08" East, 639.57 feet;
Thence North 25°18'24" East, 908.71 feet;
Thence North 67°25'03" West, 1840.79 feet;
Thence North 00°00'14" East, 329.69 feet;
Thence North 00°20'28" East, 2501.69 feet;
Thence South 89°48'41" West, 2642.27 feet;
Thence South 00°28'49" West, 1723.97 feet;
Page 657
Thence North 67°25'03" West, 3381.55 feet;
Thence North 27°54'37" East, 10982.54 feet;
Thence North 08°40'40" East, 4168.52 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
The above described parcel contains a computed area of 286,251,928 sq. ft. (6571.4400
acres) more or less and being subject to any easements, restrictions, rights-of-way of
record or otherwise.
Page 658
Page 659
Attachment B
Staff Report Z-75-18-2
March 9, 2022
Village Planning Committee Meeting North Gateway – March 10, 2022
Dates: Desert View – April 5, 2022
Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 5, 2022
Request From: RE-35 DCOD A (481.05 acres), S-1 DCOD A
(155.19 acres)
Request To: RE-35 (236.97 acres), S-1 (155.19 acres), RE-
35 DCOD B (244.08)
Proposed Use: Modify the boundary of Desert Character
Overlay Districts
Location: South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the
16th and 32nd Street alignments
Owner: MacEwan Ranch, LLC
Arizona State Land Department
Applicant / Representative Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Denial as filed, approval of the staff
recommended area in Z-TA-5-18-2
General Plan Conformity
Future Parks / Open Space or
Residential 1 dwelling unit per acre
Preserve / Residential 0 to 1 and 1 to 2
General Plan Land Use Map Designation dwelling units per acre
Preserve / Floodplain
Residential 0 to 2 dwelling units per acre
Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre
Street Map Sonoran Desert 150-foot roadway
Major arterial
Classification Drive easement
Page 660
Staff Report: Z-75-18-2
March 9, 2022
BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; DESERT LANDSCAPE;
LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Promote land uses that preserve Phoenix’s natural open
spaces.
The proposed Desert Maintenance Overlay applicability area proposes to maintain the
district standards and design guidelines that were originally intended to ensure
compatible development adjacent to the preserve areas north of Sonoran Desert Drive.
CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND
USE PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity, respectful of
local conditions and surrounding neighborhoods.
Removal of the Desert Character Overlay Districts standards from property south of the
Sonoran Desert Drive alignment will allow for a nominal increase in intensity that was
contemplated in the Peripheral Area C and D and North Land Use plans.
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; CERTAINTY AND CHARACTER; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: New
development and expansion or redevelopment of existing development in or near
residential areas should be compatible with existing uses and consistent with
adopted plans.
The development proposed in the Verdin PUD, via companion Rezoning Case No.
Z-62-18, integrates several design considerations that are consistent with the adopted
plans for the area in addition to many of the design guidelines incorporated in the Desert
Maintenance Overlay of Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives
Desert Character Overlay Districts: See Background Item Nos. 3 and 4.
Peripheral Areas C and D Plan: See Background Item No. 5.
North Land Use Plan: See Background Item No. 6.
Page 661
Staff Report: Z-75-18-2
March 9, 2022
Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning
Land Use Zoning
On Site Vacant RE-35 DCOD A, S-1 DCOD A
Phoenix Sonoran Preserve,
North RE-35 DCOD A
Vacant
West Vacant RE-35 DCOD A
East Vacant RE-35 DCOD A, RE-35 DCOD B
South Vacant RE-35, S-1, RE-35 DCOD B
Background/Issues/Analysis
REQUEST
1. This is a request to rezone
636.24 acres located south of
Sonoran Desert Drive between
the 16th Street and 32nd Street
alignments from RE-35 DCOD A
(Single-Family Residence
District, Desert Character
Overlay Districts, Desert
Maintenance Overlay Sub-
District A) and S-1 DCOD A
(Ranch or Farm Residence,
Desert Character Overlay
Districts, Desert Maintenance
Overlay Sub-District A) to RE-35
(Single-Family Residence
District, RE-35 DCOD B (Single-
Family Residence District,
Desert Character Overlay
Districts, Desert Maintenance
Overlay Sub-District B) and S-1
(Ranch or Farm Residence) for
a modification of the boundary of
Applicant Proposed Request, Zoning
the Desert Character Overlay Sketch Map, Source: City of Phoenix
Districts.
Page 662
Staff Report: Z-75-18-2
March 9, 2022
This request is a companion case to
Text Amendment Case No. Z-TA-5-
18-2. If approved, Z-TA-5-18-2
would amend the Zoning Ordinance
language and maps in Section 653
whereas Z-75-18-2 would amend
the Zoning Map to reflect the
changes proposed.
Staff is recommending that a
smaller portion of the applicant’s
request be approved to be
consistent with the staff
recommendation for Z-TA-5-18.
The staff recommended change
area (155.06 acres) is shown to the
right.
Staff Recommendation, Zoning Sketch
Map, Source: City of Phoenix
2. In addition to Z-TA-5-18-2, there are two additional concurrent requests.
General Plan Amendment Case No. GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 and Rezoning Case No.
Z-62-18-2 encompass the Verdin site (488 acres). General Plan Amendment
Case No. GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 seeks to modify the land use map designation and
removal from the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay. Rezoning Case No. Z-62-18-
2 proposes to rezone the property to a Planned Unit Development district.
DESERT CHARACTER OVERLAY DISTRICTS
3. The Desert Character Overlay Districts, Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance,
was established in 2001 via Text Amendment Case No. Z-TA-3-99 with a
general purpose to implement the North Land Use Plan. The intent of the
overlay was to establish three character areas; Desert Maintenance, Rural
Desert and Suburban Desert, to define the nature of development while
maintaining undisturbed areas and to provide guidance for new development.
Standards for the Desert Maintenance Overlay District were included in the
original text amendment. Standards for the Rural Desert and Suburban Desert
Overlay Districts have not been established.
Page 663
Staff Report: Z-75-18-2
March 9, 2022
4. The overlay district contains distinct permitted uses and district standards for
Desert Maintenance Character Sub-Districts A and B in addition to design
guidelines applicable to both subdistricts. Single-family residential uses are
permitted in both subdistricts, with attached dwelling units only permitted in Sub-
District B.
District standards for the subdistricts include provisions designed to address lot
size, building envelope, height, setbacks, access, native landscaping and
treatment of washes. Design guidelines contain additional guidance on site
disturbance, native plant preservation, building and wall design, and access to
preserve areas, among others.
PERIPHERAL AREAS C AND D PLAN
5. In 1987, Phoenix City Council adopted the Peripheral Areas C and D Plan as an
amendment to the General Plan. The intent of the Peripheral Areas C and D
Plan was to serve as a guide for future land use and development in the
planning area, which consisted of approximately 111 square miles of largely
undeveloped land north of the Central Arizona Project canal in North Phoenix.
Within the Implementation Program section of the Plan, further refinement of the
general character elements was suggested prior to any formal ordinance
adoption.
NORTH LAND USE PLAN
6. The North Land Use Plan was adopted in 1996 to further the existing policies of
the Peripheral Areas C and D Plan. The Plan divided the planning area into
three character areas; Desert Preserve, Rural Desert and Suburban Residential,
and suggested that overlay districts be developed to provide clear development
standards in line with community desires. The Desert Preserve character area
aligns with the area included in the Desert Maintenance Overlay of the Desert
Character Overlay Districts.
Page 664
Staff Report: Z-75-18-2
March 9, 2022
North Land Use Plan Character Areas, Source: City of Phoenix
VERDIN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
7. The Verdin Planned Unit Development (Companion Rezoning Case No. Z-62-
18-2) intregrates a number of design considerations based on Desert
Maintenane Character District standards. These include a sensitive transition
from open space to developed areas, conservation of washes and wildlife
habitats, and use of native plants.
In addition to the considerations based on overlay standards, the Planned Unit
Development includes enhanced standards for increased open space,
connectivity to adjacent preserve areas, a public trail and heightened landscape
standards developed in concert with the National Wildlife Federation.
These standards collectively ensure appropriate development within the
undisturbed desert context.
Page 665
Staff Report: Z-75-18-2
March 9, 2022
SONORAN DESERT DRIVE ROADWAY ALIGNMENT HISTORY
8. The Peripheral Areas C and D Plan included discussion of a proposed
Northeast Outer Loop. The Northeast Outer Loop was a planned limited access
extension of the Northwest Loop from Interstate 17, north of the Union Hills and
Cave Buttes recreation areas, connecting to Dynamite Boulevard and traversing
east toward the city of Scottsdale. Proposed land uses for Area D (north of
Jomax Road) were contemplated based on proposed transportation
infrastructure, with a Village Core planned for the northwest corner of Cave
Creek Road and the Northeast Outer Loop / Dynamite Road alignment.
Peripheral Areas C and D Plan Land Use and Circulation, Source: City of Phoenix
9. By the North Land Use Plan’s adoption, plans for the Northeast Outer Loop had
ceased. As a result, the planned Core at Cave Creek and Dynamite Roads was
reduced in size and geared to function as a community service area instead of
an employment hub. Reduction in the planned commercial area at this location
contributed to the inclusion of the area west of Cave Creek Road into the Desert
Preserve character area identified in the plan. While no longer planned as a
limited access roadway, Dynamite Road was utilized as a dividing line between
a planned preservation buffer for the Cave Creek Wash to the north and a more
dense residental area adjacent to the Cave Buttes Recreational area to the
south.
10. While an east-west connection between Interstate 17 and northeast Phoenix
has been planned since 1987, public involvment efforts to refine the alignment
and type of roadway commenced in 2002. The final aligment for Sonoran
Parkway, adopted by Phoenix City Council in 2006 as a result of the
recommendation by the East Sonoran Parkway Alignment Committee, was
carefully designed to minimize the impact of the roadway on the future mountain
preserve area and intended to serve as a buffer between the preserve and
adjacent development. Construction of Sonoran Boulevard, now known as the
northern leg of Sonoran Desert Drive, began in 2010 and was completed in
2013.
Page 666
Staff Report: Z-75-18-2
March 9, 2022
11. Due to the shift in the transportation corridor from the inception of the Desert
Character Overlay Districts in addition to the enhanced standards contained in
the Verdin PUD, the staff recommended modification to the Sub-District
boundaries and associated ordinance language is warranted.
COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
12. At the time the staff report was written, staff has received 82 letters in oppositon
and three letters in support of the overall proposal. Several letters in opposition
expressed concern with proposed overlay modification.
Findings
1. The rezoning request is a companion case to Z-TA-5-18-2 and would update the
Zoning Map boundaries for the changes proposed.
2. The proposal is consistent with changes in the transportation corridor alignment
since originally adopted.
3. The proposal maintains overlay district standards for the property north of
Sonoran Desert Drive, adjacent to the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve, and allows for
integration of appropriate design standards from the overlay in the Verdin
Planned Unit Development (Companion Rezoning Case No. Z-62-18-2).
Stipulations
None.
Writer
Samantha Keating
March 9, 2022
Team Leader
Joshua Bednarek
Exhibits
Proposed Sketch Map
Staff Recommendation Sketch Map
Aerial Sketch Map
Staff Recommendation Aerial Sketch Map
Page 667
C-1
OF TOWN O F
R1-10 PCD *
CAV E
PCD *
CREE K
7 TH AVE
CARE FREE
CAREFREE HWY Z-131-95
Z-131-95
STA TE R O U TE 7 4 (C A RE FR EE H IG H WAY )
S-1*
C-2 * AN X 33 4
Z- 1 25 -0 1
* Z- 3 5- 05
M ARI CO PA C-2
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
RE-35 *
AN X 18 1
CITY O F
AN X 33 4
R1-1 8
4 0 TH ST
Z- 3 5- 05
PRD *
Z- 3 1- 01 AN X 24 4
CO UN T Y Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
CP/GC P *
MARICOPA COUNTY
AN X 18 1
R1-18 PCD *
CP / G C P
*
Z- 9 0- 01
S-1
R1-1 8
PRD *
SCO TTSDA LE
5 2 ND ST
5 6 TH ST
S-1
Z-131-95
Z- 5 5- 95
MARICOPA
55TH ST
COUN TY S-1
R1-1 8 PRD * AN X 49 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
C-1
*
S-1 MARICO PA
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 PRD *
R-2 *
R-2 *
Z- 5 5- 95
P ho en i x C it y L im it s P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 3 9- 04
Z- 3 8- 04
S-1 * RA
S-1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 3 8- 03
AN X 29 1
NC
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 * * COUNTY
R1-1 8 PRD
Z-112-08
Z- 4 -9 3
HO
R1-1 8 PRD*
R1 -1 8 PR D *
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 4 6- 98
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1 *
S-1
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- S P - 21 -9 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP * R1-1 8 PRD *
PAL
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- 5 5- 95 P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1 *
S-1
O
S-1
AN X 39 5
Z- 8 8- 07
R-3 *
MA
Z-3 3- 12
RE-35 *
Z- 9 8- 92
R1-1 8 PRD *
DO DR
Z- 5 5- 95 S-1 S-1 S-1
Z- 1 73 -0 1 Z- 3 8- 03
S-1 AN X 26 2
AN X 29 1
Z- 4 5- 03
AN X 29 8
D RE-35
VE R1-18 *
S-1 R1-1 8 PRD * R1-1 8
KR
Z- 1 20 -9 6
PRD *
Z- 7 -9 4
53RD ST
R1-1 8 PRD
VA Z-145-06
Z-6 8-04
LL S-1 *
PH O - 1 - 17 - - Z - 77 - 16
EE
S-2*
Z- 5 1- 06
EY
S-1 Z- 3 7- 03
S-2 *
ANX 358
AN X 29 0
ANX 445 Z-7 1-06
Z- 7 7- 16
S-1
AN X 34 0
Z- 7 6- 06
R1-18 PRD *
RE-35
Z- 9 3- 94
R1-1 8 *
RD
S-1
CR
Z- 7 -9 4
Z- 6 5- 03
Sub-District A
AN X 29 9
S-1
Z- 4 2- 99
AN X 20 5
Z-58-01 R1-1 0*
Z- 6 7- 15
R1-1 8*
S-1 * S-1
R1 -18 *
Z- 5 7- 15
Z- 2 -1 8 Z- 4 2- 00
C-2 SP
Z- 9 3- 97
AN X 22 8
CA
AN X 27 8
Z- 1 65 -0 2
C-2 SP *
C-2 SP AN X 26 4
RE-35
AN X 27 7 Z- 1 0- 02
RE-35 *
Z- 1 64 -0 2
R1-1 8*
C-2 *
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
C-1 * RE-35
AN X 26 4
Z- 1 04 -0 3
Z- 4 7- 16
Z- 1 0- 02 AN X 40 0 S- 1
PUD
VE
AN X 30 4 Z- 1 32 - 7
C-2 * Z- 9 3- 97
Z- 2 8- 14 AN X 6 4 C-2
Z- 1 61 -9 9
Z- 1 0- 02 C-2 AN X 21 6
AN X 21 8 Z- 1 77 -9 9
Z- 3 2- 00
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-1 8 PRD *
PCD * *
C-2 * Z-5 0-13
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
PC D
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
56TH ST
FH *
Z- 2 9- 02
RE -3 5 *
DE
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
RE-35
R1-6 * R1 -6 *
PCD
PC D
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 C-1 PCD *
Z- 2 37 -G -8 5 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 1 3- 01
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
R1-10 R
SE
RE-35 *
Z- 1 14 -9 5
AN X 17 9
Z-34-13
R-2 *
PC D
MARICO PA
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-8 *
R-2 *
PCD
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 PCD
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5 T RE- 35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
W
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37-A- 85
R-2 PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
RE -35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
IL R1-10
R1-1 8 *
Z- 4 1- 05
LO
C-O /G-O
PCD PCD *
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
Z- 2 37 -H - 8 5 Z-2 37-B- 85
R1 -1 0 *
C-2 * PC D
Z-2 37-A- 85 Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
DIXILETA DR
R1-10
C-2 PCD
DNS /W VR *
Z-2 37-G -85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85 C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
C-2 *
C- 2
PCD*
Z-4 3- 98
PCD *
Z-2 37-D- 85
W
PK
Z-1 20-9 4
C-2
PCD
SP * PU D
Z- 43- 98
Z- 43- A - 98 R-3A Z-3 6 -1 2
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85 R1 -8
PC D *
COUNTY
S-1
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
C-2
PCD *
PCD *
Z-2 37-8 5
C- 2
PC D
SP *
Z-2 37-J- 85 C-2
PCD *
C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37 -G -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
RE-3 5
R1 -6
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
W
R1 -8 *
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-5 6-97
CP / GCP
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-3 3-99
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-B- 85
R1-6
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-C- 85
Z-2 37-E- 85
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -C - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
Y R1 - 8 *
Z-SP-14 -89 R1 -10 *
44TH ST
Z- 1 05 -0 1
Z-6 5 -19
RE -35
42ND ST
CP / BP *
Z-1 08-0 7
S- 1*
AN X 44 4
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
R1-10 *
MARICOPA
R1-6 *
AN X 25 8
Z-1 2 2 -1 4
R1-6 *
Z- 6 -0 2
Z- 4 1- 96
Z-6 4-13 S-1
AN X 4 8 2
RE -35
R1 -6
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
COUNTY
R1-10* Z-2 37 -C -8 5
RE-43
Z-2 37 -E -8 5
Z-6 9 -1 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
PCD
*
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Phoenix City Limits
AN X 21 2
RH PCD
Z- 1 13 -9 9
R1-6 PCD *
P ho en i x C it y L im it s S-1
S-1 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 24 3
Z- 2 0- 01 R1-6
40TH ST
S-1 PCD * R1 -8 *
S-1 SP *
Sub-District B
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 22 1 PRD
Z-109-97
AN X 22 1
S-2
Z- 2 9- 00
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 1 50 -0 1
Z- S P - 22 -0 3
AN X 35 1
S-1
PCD *
Z- 1 76 -0 5
7 TH AVE
R1-8 * C-2 *
AN X 22 1
C-1 * S-1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 1 16 -0 7 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
DYNAMITE BLVD
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 7 1- 03 AN X 17 3
R1-1 8 * S-1*
S-1
S-1 Z-5 6- 95 R1 -10 *
AN X 41 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 7 3- 16
AN X 50 8 Z- 4 5- 13
AN X 25 7
Z- 5 -0 2
Ph oe ni x C i ty L i m it s
DY NA M ITE B L VD
C-1 *
R1-18 *
Z-1 25 -9 9
PUD *
Z-2 2- 18
Z-61-06
R1-1 8 *
Z-7 3 -9 7
RE-35
CITY O F
MARICOPA
Pho enix City L imits
TATUM BLVD
Z-58-01 COUNTY
S-1 SO RE-35
N OR R1 -1 0 *
AN
Z- 1 18 -9 4
R1 -1 0 *
Z- 9 7- 94
Z- 1 18 -9 4
S-1*
SCO TTSDA LE
Z-2 6-09
D ES
Phoenix Ctiy Limits
ER
TD
R1-6 *
R1-1 0 * R1-6 * PCD Pho enix City L imits
S-1
PCD Z- 1 46 -9 7
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
RE-35
R
ANX 149 R1-8 *
JOMAX RD
R1 -8 * PCD
PC D
RE-35 *
Z- 9 9- 88
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 9 9- 88
R-2
PCD
*
PCD
* C-2 P CD *
S-1 *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88 Z- 9 9- 88
AN X 50 5
R-2 *
R1-10 *
Z- 9 9- 88
RE - 43
R1-6 *
RE - 43
PCD
S-1
PCD Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 1 46 -9 7
R-2 *
MARICOP A R1-6
PCD
*
PCD S-1
COUNTY R1-6
S-1
R1-6 * Z-61-06 R1-18 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
* Z- 9 9- C - 88
PCD
R1-8 *
PC D * Z- 9 9- 88
R1-6 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- A - 88
R1-8
Z- 9 9- 88
*
PCD PCD *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88 *
YEARLING RD Z-61-06
PC D
Z-61-06 Z-61-06
I
CAREFREE HWY
Z-75-18 DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
Miles
DYNAMITE BLVD
1 0.5 0 1 JOMAX RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD
PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
BLACK MTN PKY
SR-101
MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
FROM:
S-1 DCOD Sub-District A ( 155.19 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
9/29/2021 RE-35 DCOD Sub-District A ( 481.05 a.c.)
Z-75-18 REVISION DATES:
2/25/2022
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
S-1 ( 155.19 a.c.)
QUARTER SEC. NO.
R9, R10, Q9, RE-35 ( 236.97 a.c.)
636.24 Acres Q51-35, Q51-36, Q52-32, Q52-33,
Q52-34, Q52-36, Q52-37, Q53-30,
TO: RE-35 DCOD Sub-District B ( 244.08 a.c.)
Q53-31, Q53-32, Q53-33, Q53-34,
Q54-30, Q54-31, Q54-32, Q54-33
Q10, P9, P10
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 DCOD A, RE-35 DCOD A 155, 529 N/A, 635
S-1, RE-35, RE-35 DCOD B 155, 260, 268 N/A, 313, 322
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-75-18.mxd
Page 668
C-1
OF TOWN O F
R1-10 PCD *
CAV E
PCD *
CREE K
7 TH AVE
CARE FREE
CAREFREE HWY Z-131-95
Z-131-95
STA TE R O U TE 7 4 (C A RE FR EE H IG H WAY )
S-1*
C-2 * AN X 33 4
Z- 1 25 -0 1
* Z- 3 5- 05
M ARI CO PA C-2
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
RE-35 *
AN X 18 1
CITY O F
AN X 33 4
R1-1 8
4 0 TH ST
Z- 3 5- 05
PRD *
Z- 3 1- 01 AN X 24 4
CO UN T Y Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
CP/GC P *
MARICOPA COUNTY
AN X 18 1
R1-18 PCD *
CP / G C P
*
Z- 9 0- 01
S-1
R1-1 8
PRD *
SCO TTSDA LE
5 2 ND ST
5 6 TH ST
S-1
Z-131-95
Z- 5 5- 95
MARICOPA
55TH ST
COUN TY S-1
R1-1 8 PRD * AN X 49 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
C-1
*
S-1 MARICO PA
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 PRD *
R-2 *
R-2 *
Z- 5 5- 95
P ho en i x C it y L im it s P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 3 9- 04
Z- 3 8- 04
S-1 * RA
S-1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 3 8- 03
AN X 29 1
NC
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 * * COUNTY
R1-1 8 PRD
Z-112-08
Z- 4 -9 3
HO
R1-1 8 PRD*
R1 -1 8 PR D *
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 4 6- 98
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1 *
S-1
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- S P - 21 -9 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP * R1-1 8 PRD *
PAL
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- 5 5- 95 P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1 *
S-1
O
S-1
AN X 39 5
Z- 8 8- 07
R-3 *
MA
Z-3 3- 12
RE-35 *
Z- 9 8- 92
R1-1 8 PRD *
DO DR
Z- 5 5- 95 S-1 S-1 S-1
Z- 1 73 -0 1 Z- 3 8- 03
S-1 AN X 26 2
AN X 29 1
Z- 4 5- 03
AN X 29 8
D RE-35
VE S-1 R1-18 *
S-1 R1-1 8 PRD * R1-1 8
KR
Z- 1 20 -9 6
PRD *
Z- 7 -9 4
53RD ST
R1-1 8 PRD
VA Z-110-05 Z-145-06
Z-6 8-04
LL S-1 *
PH O - 1 - 17 - - Z - 77 - 16
EE
S-2*
Z- 5 1- 06
EY
S-1 Z- 3 7- 03
S-2 *
ANX 358
AN X 29 0
ANX 445 Z-7 1-06
Z- 7 7- 16
S-1
AN X 34 0
Z- 7 6- 06
R1-18 PRD *
RE-35
Z- 9 3- 94
R1-1 8 *
RD
S-1
CR
Z- 7 -9 4
Z- 6 5- 03
Sub-District A
AN X 29 9
S-1
Z- 4 2- 99
AN X 20 5
Z-58-01 R1-1 0*
Z- 6 7- 15
R1-1 8*
S-1 * S-1
R1 -18 *
Z- 5 7- 15
Z- 2 -1 8 Z- 4 2- 00
C-2 SP
Z- 9 3- 97
AN X 22 8
CA
AN X 27 8
Z- 1 65 -0 2
C-2 SP *
C-2 SP AN X 26 4
RE-35
AN X 27 7 Z- 1 0- 02
RE-35 *
Z- 1 64 -0 2
R1-1 8*
C-2 *
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
C-1 * RE-35
AN X 26 4
Z- 1 04 -0 3
Z- 4 7- 16
Z- 1 0- 02 AN X 40 0 S- 1
PUD
VE
AN X 30 4 Z- 1 32 - 7
C-2 * Z- 9 3- 97
Z- 2 8- 14 AN X 6 4 C-2
Z- 1 61 -9 9
Z- 1 0- 02 C-2 AN X 21 6
AN X 21 8 Z- 1 77 -9 9
Z- 3 2- 00
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-1 8 PRD *
PCD * *
C-2 * Z-5 0-13
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
PC D
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
56TH ST
FH *
Z- 2 9- 02
RE -3 5 *
DE
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
RE-35
R1-6 * R1 -6 *
PCD
PC D
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 C-1 PCD *
Z- 2 37 -G -8 5 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 1 3- 01
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
R1-10 R
SE
RE-35 *
Z- 1 14 -9 5
AN X 17 9
Z-34-13
R-2 *
PC D
MARICO PA
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-8 *
R-2 *
PCD
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 PCD
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5 T RE- 35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
W
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37-A- 85
R-2 PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
RE -35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
IL R1-10
R1-1 8 *
Z- 4 1- 05
LO
C-O /G-O
PCD PCD *
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
Z- 2 37 -H - 8 5 Z-2 37-B- 85
R1 -1 0 *
C-2 * PC D
Z-2 37-A- 85 Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
DIXILETA DR
R1-10
C-2 PCD
DNS /W VR *
Z-2 37-G -85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85 C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
C-2 *
C- 2
PCD*
Z-4 3- 98
PCD *
Z-2 37-D- 85
W
PK
Z-1 20-9 4
C-2
PCD
SP * PU D
Z- 43- 98
Z- 43- A - 98 R-3A Z-3 6 -1 2
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85 R1 -8
PC D *
COUNTY
S-1
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
C-2
PCD *
PCD *
Z-2 37-8 5
C- 2
PC D
SP *
Z-2 37-J- 85 C-2
PCD *
C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37 -G -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
RE-3 5
R1 -6
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
W
R1 -8 *
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-5 6-97
CP / GCP
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-3 3-99
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-B- 85
R1-6
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-C- 85
Z-2 37-E- 85
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -C - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
Y R1 - 8 *
Z-SP-14 -89 R1 -10 *
44TH ST
Z- 1 05 -0 1
Z-6 5 -19
RE -35
42ND ST
CP / BP *
Z-1 08-0 7
S- 1*
AN X 44 4
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
R1-10 *
MARICOPA
R1-6 *
AN X 25 8
Z-1 2 2 -1 4
R1-6 *
Z- 6 -0 2
Z- 4 1- 96
Z-6 4-13 S-1
AN X 4 8 2
RE -35
R1 -6
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
COUNTY
R1-10* Z-2 37 -C -8 5
RE-43
Z-2 37 -E -8 5
Z-6 9 -1 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
PCD
*
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Phoenix City Limits
AN X 21 2
RH PCD
Z- 1 13 -9 9
R1-6 PCD *
P ho en i x C it y L im it s S-1
S-1 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 24 3
Z- 2 0- 01 R1-6
40TH ST
S-1 PCD * R1 -8 *
S-1 SP * Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 22 1 PRD
Z-109-97
AN X 22 1
S-2
Z- 2 9- 00
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 1 50 -0 1
Z- S P - 22 -0 3
AN X 35 1
S-1
PCD *
Z- 1 76 -0 5
7 TH AVE
R1-8 * C-2 * C-1 * S-1
Sub-District B
AN X 22 1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 1 16 -0 7 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
DYNAMITE BLVD
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 7 1- 03 AN X 17 3
R1-1 8 * S-1*
S-1
S-1 Z-5 6- 95 R1 -10 *
AN X 41 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 7 3- 16
AN X 50 8 Z- 4 5- 13
AN X 25 7
Z- 5 -0 2
Ph oe ni x C i ty L i m it s
DY NA M ITE B L VD
C-1 *
R1-18 *
Z-1 25 -9 9
PUD *
Z-2 2- 18
Z-61-06
R1-1 8 *
Z-7 3 -9 7
RE-35
CITY O F
MARICOPA
Pho enix City L imits
TATUM BLVD
Z-58-01 COUNTY
S-1 SO RE-35
N OR R1 -1 0 *
AN
Z- 1 18 -9 4
R1 -1 0 *
Z- 9 7- 94
Z- 1 18 -9 4
S-1*
SCO TTSDA LE
Z-2 6-09
D ES
Phoenix Ctiy Limits
ER
TD
R1-6 *
R1-1 0 * R1-6 * PCD Pho enix City L imits
S-1
PCD Z- 1 46 -9 7
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
RE-35
R
ANX 149 R1-8 *
JOMAX RD
R1 -8 * PCD
PC D
RE-35 *
Z- 9 9- 88
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 9 9- 88
R-2
PCD
*
PCD
* C-2 P CD *
S-1 *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88 Z- 9 9- 88
AN X 50 5
R-2 *
R1-10 *
Z- 9 9- 88
RE - 43
R1-6 *
RE - 43
PCD
S-1
PCD Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 1 46 -9 7
R-2 *
MARICOP A R1-6
PCD
*
PCD S-1
COUNTY R1-6
S-1
R1-6 * Z-61-06 R1-18 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
* Z- 9 9- C - 88
PCD
R1-8 *
PC D * Z- 9 9- 88
R1-6 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- A - 88
R1-8
Z- 9 9- 88
*
PCD PCD *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88 *
YEARLING RD Z-61-06
PC D
Z-61-06 Z-61-06
I
CAREFREE HWY
Z-75-18 DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
Miles
DYNAMITE BLVD
1 0.5 0 1 JOMAX RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD
PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
BLACK MTN PKY
SR-101
MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
FROM:
S-1 DCOD Sub-District A ( 144.81 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
9/29/2021 RE-35 DCOD Sub-District A ( 10.25 a.c.)
Z-75-18 (Per Staff Recommendation) 2/25/2022
REVISION DATES:
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO. S-1 ( 144.81 a.c.)
155.06 Acres Q51-35, Q51-36, Q52-32, Q52-33, R9, R10, Q9,
Q52-34, Q52-36, Q52-37, Q53-30,
Q53-31, Q53-32, Q53-33, Q53-34,
Q10, P9, P10 TO: RE-35 ( 10.25 a.c.)
Q54-30, Q54-31, Q54-32, Q54-33
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 DCOD A, RE-35 DCOD A 145, 11 N/A, 13
S-1, RE-35 145, 11 N/A, 13
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-75-18_Staff_Rec.mxd
Page 669
C-1
OF TOWN O F
R1-10 PCD *
CAV E
PCD *
CREE K
7 TH AVE
CARE FREE
CAREFREE HWY Z-131-95
Z-131-95
STA TE R O U TE 7 4 (C A RE FR EE H IG H WAY )
S-1*
C-2 * AN X 33 4
Z- 1 25 -0 1
* Z- 3 5- 05
M ARI CO PA C-2
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
RE-35 *
AN X 18 1
CITY O F
AN X 33 4
R1-1 8
4 0 TH ST
Z- 3 5- 05
PRD *
Z- 3 1- 01 AN X 24 4
CO UN T Y Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
CP/GC P *
MARICOPA COUNTY
AN X 18 1
R1-18 PCD *
CP / G C P
*
Z- 9 0- 01
S-1
R1-1 8
PRD *
SCO TTSDA LE
5 2 ND ST
5 6 TH ST
S-1
Z-131-95
Z- 5 5- 95
MARICOPA
55TH ST
COUN TY S-1
R1-1 8 PRD * AN X 49 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
C-1
*
S-1 MARICO PA
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 PRD *
R-2 *
R-2 *
Z- 5 5- 95
P ho en i x C it y L im it s P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 3 9- 04
Z- 3 8- 04
S-1 * RA
S-1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 3 8- 03
AN X 29 1
NC
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 * * COUNTY
R1-1 8 PRD
Z-112-08
Z- 4 -9 3
HO
R1-1 8 PRD*
R1 -1 8 PR D *
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 4 6- 98
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1 *
S-1
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- S P - 21 -9 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP * R1-1 8 PRD *
PAL
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- 5 5- 95 P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1 *
S-1
O
S-1
AN X 39 5
Z- 8 8- 07
R-3 *
MA
Z-3 3- 12
RE-35 *
Z- 9 8- 92
R1-1 8 PRD *
DO DR
Z- 5 5- 95 S-1 S-1 S-1
Z- 1 73 -0 1 Z- 3 8- 03
S-1 AN X 26 2
AN X 29 1
Z- 4 5- 03
AN X 29 8
D RE-35
VE R1-18 *
S-1 R1-1 8 PRD * R1-1 8
KR
Z- 1 20 -9 6
PRD *
Z- 7 -9 4
53RD ST
R1-1 8 PRD
VA Z-145-06
Z-6 8-04
LL S-1 *
PH O - 1 - 17 - - Z - 77 - 16
EE
S-2*
Z- 5 1- 06
EY
S-1 Z- 3 7- 03
S-2 *
ANX 358
AN X 29 0
ANX 445 Z-7 1-06
Z- 7 7- 16
S-1
AN X 34 0
Z- 7 6- 06
R1-18 PRD *
RE-35
Z- 9 3- 94
R1-1 8 *
RD
S-1
CR
Z- 7 -9 4
Z- 6 5- 03
Sub-District A
AN X 29 9
S-1
Z- 4 2- 99
AN X 20 5
Z-58-01 R1-1 0*
Z- 6 7- 15
R1-1 8*
S-1 * S-1
R1 -18 *
Z- 5 7- 15
Z- 2 -1 8 Z- 4 2- 00
C-2 SP
Z- 9 3- 97
AN X 22 8
CA
AN X 27 8
Z- 1 65 -0 2
C-2 SP *
C-2 SP AN X 26 4
RE-35
AN X 27 7 Z- 1 0- 02
RE-35 *
Z- 1 64 -0 2
R1-1 8*
C-2 *
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
C-1 * RE-35
AN X 26 4
Z- 1 04 -0 3
Z- 4 7- 16
Z- 1 0- 02 AN X 40 0 S- 1
PUD
VE
AN X 30 4 Z- 1 32 - 7
C-2 * Z- 9 3- 97
Z- 2 8- 14 AN X 6 4 C-2
Z- 1 61 -9 9
Z- 1 0- 02 C-2 AN X 21 6
AN X 21 8 Z- 1 77 -9 9
Z- 3 2- 00
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-1 8 PRD *
PCD * *
C-2 * Z-5 0-13
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
PC D
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
56TH ST
FH *
Z- 2 9- 02
RE -3 5 *
DE
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
RE-35
R1-6 * R1 -6 *
PCD
PC D
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 C-1 PCD *
Z- 2 37 -G -8 5 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 1 3- 01
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
R1-10 R
SE
RE-35 *
Z- 1 14 -9 5
AN X 17 9
Z-34-13
R-2 *
PC D
MARICO PA
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-8 *
R-2 *
PCD
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 PCD
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5 T RE- 35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
W
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37-A- 85
R-2 PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
RE -35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
IL R1-10
R1-1 8 *
Z- 4 1- 05
LO
C-O /G-O
PCD PCD *
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
Z- 2 37 -H - 8 5 Z-2 37-B- 85
R1 -1 0 *
C-2 * PC D
Z-2 37-A- 85 Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
DIXILETA DR
R1-10
C-2 PCD
DNS /W VR *
Z-2 37-G -85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85 C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
C-2 *
C- 2
PCD*
Z-4 3- 98
PCD *
Z-2 37-D- 85
W
PK
Z-1 20-9 4
C-2
PCD
SP * PU D
Z- 43- 98
Z- 43- A - 98 R-3A Z-3 6 -1 2
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85 R1 -8
PC D *
COUNTY
S-1
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
C-2
PCD *
PCD *
Z-2 37-8 5
C- 2
PC D
SP *
Z-2 37-J- 85 C-2
PCD *
C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37 -G -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
RE-3 5
R1 -6
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
W
R1 -8 *
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-5 6-97
CP / GCP
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-3 3-99
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-B- 85
R1-6
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-C- 85
Z-2 37-E- 85
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -C - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
Y R1 - 8 *
Z-SP-14 -89 R1 -10 *
44TH ST
Z- 1 05 -0 1
Z-6 5 -19
RE -35
42ND ST
CP / BP *
Z-1 08-0 7
S- 1*
AN X 44 4
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
R1-10 *
MARICOPA
R1-6 *
AN X 25 8
Z-1 2 2 -1 4
R1-6 *
Z- 6 -0 2
Z- 4 1- 96
Z-6 4-13 S-1
AN X 4 8 2
RE -35
R1 -6
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
COUNTY
R1-10* Z-2 37 -C -8 5
RE-43
Z-2 37 -E -8 5
Z-6 9 -1 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
PCD
*
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Phoenix City Limits
AN X 21 2
RH PCD
Z- 1 13 -9 9
R1-6 PCD *
P ho en i x C it y L im it s S-1
S-1 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 24 3
Z- 2 0- 01 R1-6
40TH ST
S-1 PCD * R1 -8 *
S-1 SP *
Sub-District B
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 22 1 PRD
Z-109-97
AN X 22 1
S-2
Z- 2 9- 00
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 1 50 -0 1
Z- S P - 22 -0 3
AN X 35 1
S-1
PCD *
Z- 1 76 -0 5
7 TH AVE
R1-8 * C-2 *
AN X 22 1
C-1 * S-1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 1 16 -0 7 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
DYNAMITE BLVD
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 7 1- 03 AN X 17 3
R1-1 8 * S-1*
S-1
S-1 Z-5 6- 95 R1 -10 *
AN X 41 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 7 3- 16
AN X 50 8 Z- 4 5- 13
AN X 25 7
Z- 5 -0 2
Ph oe ni x C i ty L i m it s
DY NA M ITE B L VD
C-1 *
R1-18 *
Z-1 25 -9 9
PUD *
Z-2 2- 18
Z-61-06
R1-1 8 *
Z-7 3 -9 7
RE-35
CITY O F
MARICOPA
Pho enix City L imits
TATUM BLVD
Z-58-01 COUNTY
S-1 SO RE-35
N OR R1 -1 0 *
AN
Z- 1 18 -9 4
R1 -1 0 *
Z- 9 7- 94
Z- 1 18 -9 4
S-1*
SCO TTSDA LE
Z-2 6-09
D ES
Phoenix Ctiy Limits
ER
TD
R1-6 *
R1-1 0 * R1-6 * PCD Pho enix City L imits
S-1
PCD Z- 1 46 -9 7
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
RE-35
R
ANX 149 R1-8 *
JOMAX RD
R1 -8 * PCD
PC D
RE-35 *
Z- 9 9- 88
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 9 9- 88
R-2
PCD
*
PCD
* C-2 P CD *
S-1 *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88 Z- 9 9- 88
AN X 50 5
R-2 *
R1-10 *
Z- 9 9- 88
RE - 43
R1-6 *
RE - 43
PCD
S-1
PCD Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 1 46 -9 7
R-2 *
MARICOP A R1-6
PCD
*
PCD S-1
COUNTY R1-6
S-1
R1-6 * Z-61-06 R1-18 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
* Z- 9 9- C - 88
PCD
R1-8 *
PC D * Z- 9 9- 88
R1-6 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- A - 88
R1-8
Z- 9 9- 88
*
PCD PCD *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88 *
YEARLING RD Z-61-06mapservices@phoenix.gov
PC D
Z-61-06 Z-61-06
I
CAREFREE HWY
Z-75-18 DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
Miles
DYNAMITE BLVD
1 0.5 0 1 JOMAX RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD
PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
BLACK MTN PKY
SR-101
MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
FROM:
S-1 DCOD Sub-District A ( 155.19 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
9/29/2021 RE-35 DCOD Sub-District A ( 481.05 a.c.)
Z-75-18 REVISION DATES:
2/25/2022
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
S-1 ( 155.19 a.c.)
QUARTER SEC. NO.
R9, R10, Q9, RE-35 ( 236.97 a.c.)
636.24 Acres Q51-35, Q51-36, Q52-32, Q52-33,
Q52-34, Q52-36, Q52-37, Q53-30,
TO: RE-35 DCOD Sub-District B ( 244.08 a.c.)
Q53-31, Q53-32, Q53-33, Q53-34,
Q54-30, Q54-31, Q54-32, Q54-33
Q10, P9, P10
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 DCOD A, RE-35 DCOD A 155, 529 N/A, 635
S-1, RE-35, RE-35 DCOD B 155, 260, 268 N/A, 313, 322
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-75-18.mxd
Page 670
C-1
OF TOWN O F
R1-10 PCD *
CAV E
PCD *
CREE K
7 TH AVE
CARE FREE
CAREFREE HWY Z-131-95
Z-131-95
STA TE R O U TE 7 4 (C A RE FR EE H IG H WAY )
S-1*
C-2 * AN X 33 4
Z- 1 25 -0 1
* Z- 3 5- 05
M ARI CO PA C-2
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
RE-35 *
AN X 18 1
CITY O F
AN X 33 4
R1-1 8
4 0 TH ST
Z- 3 5- 05
PRD *
Z- 3 1- 01 AN X 24 4
CO UN T Y Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
CP/GC P *
MARICOPA COUNTY
AN X 18 1
R1-18 PCD *
CP / G C P
*
Z- 9 0- 01
S-1
R1-1 8
PRD *
SCO TTSDA LE
5 2 ND ST
5 6 TH ST
S-1
Z-131-95
Z- 5 5- 95
MARICOPA
55TH ST
COUN TY S-1
R1-1 8 PRD * AN X 49 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
C-1
*
S-1 MARICO PA
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 PRD *
R-2 *
R-2 *
Z- 5 5- 95
P ho en i x C it y L im it s P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 3 9- 04
Z- 3 8- 04
S-1 * RA
S-1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 3 8- 03
AN X 29 1
NC
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 * * COUNTY
R1-1 8 PRD
Z-112-08
Z- 4 -9 3
HO
R1-1 8 PRD*
R1 -1 8 PR D *
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 4 6- 98
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1 *
S-1
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- S P - 21 -9 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP * R1-1 8 PRD *
PAL
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- 5 5- 95 P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1 *
S-1
O
S-1
AN X 39 5
Z- 8 8- 07
R-3 *
MA
Z-3 3- 12
RE-35 *
Z- 9 8- 92
R1-1 8 PRD *
DO DR
Z- 5 5- 95 S-1 S-1 S-1
Z- 1 73 -0 1 Z- 3 8- 03
S-1 AN X 26 2
AN X 29 1
Z- 4 5- 03
AN X 29 8
D RE-35
VE S-1 R1-18 *
S-1 R1-1 8 PRD * R1-1 8
KR
Z- 1 20 -9 6
PRD *
Z- 7 -9 4
53RD ST
R1-1 8 PRD
VA Z-110-05 Z-145-06
Z-6 8-04
LL S-1 *
PH O - 1 - 17 - - Z - 77 - 16
EE
S-2*
Z- 5 1- 06
EY
S-1 Z- 3 7- 03
S-2 *
ANX 358
AN X 29 0
ANX 445 Z-7 1-06
Z- 7 7- 16
S-1
AN X 34 0
Z- 7 6- 06
R1-18 PRD *
RE-35
Z- 9 3- 94
R1-1 8 *
RD
S-1
CR
Z- 7 -9 4
Z- 6 5- 03
Sub-District A
AN X 29 9
S-1
Z- 4 2- 99
AN X 20 5
Z-58-01 R1-1 0*
Z- 6 7- 15
R1-1 8*
S-1 * S-1
R1 -18 *
Z- 5 7- 15
Z- 2 -1 8 Z- 4 2- 00
C-2 SP
Z- 9 3- 97
AN X 22 8
CA
AN X 27 8
Z- 1 65 -0 2
C-2 SP *
C-2 SP AN X 26 4
RE-35
AN X 27 7 Z- 1 0- 02
RE-35 *
Z- 1 64 -0 2
R1-1 8*
C-2 *
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
C-1 * RE-35
AN X 26 4
Z- 1 04 -0 3
Z- 4 7- 16
Z- 1 0- 02 AN X 40 0 S- 1
PUD
VE
AN X 30 4 Z- 1 32 - 7
C-2 * Z- 9 3- 97
Z- 2 8- 14 AN X 6 4 C-2
Z- 1 61 -9 9
Z- 1 0- 02 C-2 AN X 21 6
AN X 21 8 Z- 1 77 -9 9
Z- 3 2- 00
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-1 8 PRD *
PCD * *
C-2 * Z-5 0-13
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
PC D
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
56TH ST
FH *
Z- 2 9- 02
RE -3 5 *
DE
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
RE-35
R1-6 * R1 -6 *
PCD
PC D
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 C-1 PCD *
Z- 2 37 -G -8 5 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 1 3- 01
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
R1-10 R
SE
RE-35 *
Z- 1 14 -9 5
AN X 17 9
Z-34-13
R-2 *
PC D
MARICO PA
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-8 *
R-2 *
PCD
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 PCD
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5 T RE- 35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
W
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37-A- 85
R-2 PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
RE -35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
IL R1-10
R1-1 8 *
Z- 4 1- 05
LO
C-O /G-O
PCD PCD *
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
Z- 2 37 -H - 8 5 Z-2 37-B- 85
R1 -1 0 *
C-2 * PC D
Z-2 37-A- 85 Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
DIXILETA DR
R1-10
C-2 PCD
DNS /W VR *
Z-2 37-G -85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85 C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
C-2 *
C- 2
PCD*
Z-4 3- 98
PCD *
Z-2 37-D- 85
W
PK
Z-1 20-9 4
C-2
PCD
SP * PU D
Z- 43- 98
Z- 43- A - 98 R-3A Z-3 6 -1 2
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85 R1 -8
PC D *
COUNTY
S-1
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
C-2
PCD *
PCD *
Z-2 37-8 5
C- 2
PC D
SP *
Z-2 37-J- 85 C-2
PCD *
C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37 -G -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
RE-3 5
R1 -6
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
W
R1 -8 *
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-5 6-97
CP / GCP
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-3 3-99
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-B- 85
R1-6
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-C- 85
Z-2 37-E- 85
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -C - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
Y R1 - 8 *
Z-SP-14 -89 R1 -10 *
44TH ST
Z- 1 05 -0 1
Z-6 5 -19
RE -35
42ND ST
CP / BP *
Z-1 08-0 7
S- 1*
AN X 44 4
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
R1-10 *
MARICOPA
R1-6 *
AN X 25 8
Z-1 2 2 -1 4
R1-6 *
Z- 6 -0 2
Z- 4 1- 96
Z-6 4-13 S-1
AN X 4 8 2
RE -35
R1 -6
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
COUNTY
R1-10* Z-2 37 -C -8 5
RE-43
Z-2 37 -E -8 5
Z-6 9 -1 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
PCD
*
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Phoenix City Limits
AN X 21 2
RH PCD
Z- 1 13 -9 9
R1-6 PCD *
P ho en i x C it y L im it s S-1
S-1 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 24 3
Z- 2 0- 01 R1-6
40TH ST
S-1 PCD * R1 -8 *
S-1 SP * Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 22 1 PRD
Z-109-97
AN X 22 1
S-2
Z- 2 9- 00
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 1 50 -0 1
Z- S P - 22 -0 3
AN X 35 1
S-1
PCD *
Z- 1 76 -0 5
7 TH AVE
R1-8 * C-2 * C-1 * S-1
Sub-District B
AN X 22 1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 1 16 -0 7 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
DYNAMITE BLVD
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 7 1- 03 AN X 17 3
R1-1 8 * S-1*
S-1
S-1 Z-5 6- 95 R1 -10 *
AN X 41 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 7 3- 16
AN X 50 8 Z- 4 5- 13
AN X 25 7
Z- 5 -0 2
Ph oe ni x C i ty L i m it s
DY NA M ITE B L VD
C-1 *
R1-18 *
Z-1 25 -9 9
PUD *
Z-2 2- 18
Z-61-06
R1-1 8 *
Z-7 3 -9 7
RE-35
CITY O F
MARICOPA
Pho enix City L imits
TATUM BLVD
Z-58-01 COUNTY
S-1 SO RE-35
N OR R1 -1 0 *
AN
Z- 1 18 -9 4
R1 -1 0 *
Z- 9 7- 94
Z- 1 18 -9 4
S-1*
SCO TTSDA LE
Z-2 6-09
D ES
Phoenix Ctiy Limits
ER
TD
R1-6 *
R1-1 0 * R1-6 * PCD Pho enix City L imits
S-1
PCD Z- 1 46 -9 7
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
RE-35
R
ANX 149 R1-8 *
JOMAX RD
R1 -8 * PCD
PC D
RE-35 *
Z- 9 9- 88
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 9 9- 88
R-2
PCD
*
PCD
* C-2 P CD *
S-1 *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88 Z- 9 9- 88
AN X 50 5
R-2 *
R1-10 *
Z- 9 9- 88
RE - 43
R1-6 *
RE - 43
PCD
S-1
PCD Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 1 46 -9 7
R-2 *
MARICOP A R1-6
PCD
*
PCD S-1
COUNTY R1-6
S-1
R1-6 * Z-61-06 R1-18 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
* Z- 9 9- C - 88
PCD
R1-8 *
PC D * Z- 9 9- 88
R1-6 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- A - 88
R1-8
Z- 9 9- 88
*
PCD PCD *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88 *
YEARLING RD Z-61-06mapservices@phoenix.gov
PC D
Z-61-06 Z-61-06
I
CAREFREE HWY
Z-75-18 DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
Miles
DYNAMITE BLVD
1 0.5 0 1 JOMAX RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD
PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
BLACK MTN PKY
SR-101
MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
FROM:
S-1 DCOD Sub-District A ( 144.81 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
9/29/2021 RE-35 DCOD Sub-District A ( 10.25 a.c.)
Z-75-18 (Per Staff Recommendation) 2/25/2022
REVISION DATES:
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO. S-1 ( 144.81 a.c.)
155.06 Acres Q51-35, Q51-36, Q52-32, Q52-33, R9, R10, Q9,
Q52-34, Q52-36, Q52-37, Q53-30,
Q53-31, Q53-32, Q53-33, Q53-34,
Q10, P9, P10 TO: RE-35 ( 10.25 a.c.)
Q54-30, Q54-31, Q54-32, Q54-33
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 DCOD A, RE-35 DCOD A 145, 11 N/A, 13
S-1, RE-35 145, 11 N/A, 13
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-75-18_Staff_Rec.mxd
Page 671
Attachment C
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-75-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting December 9, 2021
Request From RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District) and S-1 DCOD (Ranch or
Farm Residence, Desert Character Overlay District)
Request To RE-35 (Single-Family Residence District), RE-35 DCOD
(Single-Family Residence District, Desert Character
Overlay District) and S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence)
Proposed Use Modify the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD)
boundaries to modify a portion from Sub-District A to
Sub-District B and to remove a portion of property from
Sub-District A to allow for single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #3 – Information Only – GPA-DSTV-1-18-2,
Item #4 – Information Only – Z-62-18-2, and Item #5 – Information Only – Z-TA-5-18-2.
Committee member Julie Read arrived to the meeting during this item, bringing the
quorum to 5 members.
3 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve, will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes per
acre, and will have 7 miles of trails and community paths. She discussed the
application requests to rezone to PUD, amend the General Plan, and amend the Desert
Character Overlay District. She also discussed the extension and build out of Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt also discussed the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife
Federation (NWF). She discussed the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. She noted the NWF landscape palette, pedestrian
circulation, and open edge plan.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 672
Vice Chair Shannon Simon asked about the timeline for constructing Sonoran Desert
Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that the buildout for Sonoran Desert Drive will cost
approximately $120 million and there is no defined timeline. She stated that the
development will complete a Traffic Impact Study to determine the level of service and
the necessary improvements.
Committee member Michelle Ricart asked whether the applicant reached out to the
school district. Susan Demmitt stated that they are working with the school district on
a donation agreement. She added that there will be no modifications to the boundaries
of the school district and students living in the development will be within the boundary
of Desert Mountain schools.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, expressed concerns with
removal of the Desert Character Overlay. He stated that areas adjacent to preserve
areas should be low density. He also expressed concerns regarding increased traffic.
Paul Grayczyk, president of the Sonoran Gate Home Owner’s Association, encouraged
larger setbacks from Sonoran Desert Drive.
Bob Thompson, a member of the public, stated that the beauty of the area should be
maintained. He added that the developer should honor the Desert Character Overlay
and keep the preserve areas as is.
Susan Demmitt stated that she had no additional comments or responses at this time,
but will continue dialogue with the community going forward.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 673
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-75-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting November 8, 2018
Request Modify the Desert Character Overlay District for
approximately 638 acres to modify a portion from Sub-
District A to Sub-District B and remove a portion of
property from Sub-District A
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, presented the information to the Village regarding MacEwen
480 PUD. She addressed the history of the site and the current requests to ultimately
build 1,420 homes. She addressed that a portion of the 480 acres is within the Desert
Character Overlay District and the North Land Use Plan. She stated they are working
with the Deer Valley School District to come up with a solution to the school capacity
issue. She stated they are looking into the option of Cave Creek Schools.
Tim Mitten, VPC member, expressed several concerns:
- Traffic safety and cyclist safety on Sonoran Desert Drive.
- Public safety response time.
- Elimination of the night sky.
- Density is too high.
He then asked if the applicant has been in communication with the State Land
Department to see when the surrounding land will be opened for auction. Susan
Demmitt stated it won’t be within the next 5 years.
Jason Stokes, VPC member, asked where the closest fire station is located. Ms.
Demmitt stated Cave Creek and Dynamite.
Steve Tucker, VPC member, asked what would happen in the notch. Ms. Demmitt
states most likely residential. Mr. Tucker stated that the road improvements to Sonoran
Desert Drive need to happen before development.
Julie Read, VPC member, asked how many homes are approved for Sonoran Gate. Ms.
Demmitt responded 255 homes.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 674
Shannon Simon, VPC member, inquired about the City’s timeline for the complete build
out of Sonoran Desert Drive. She stated the light pollution from Sonoran Gate isn’t as
bad as she thought. Ms. Simon then asked if all the neighborhoods will be gated. Ms.
Demmitt responded that some neighborhoods will be gated.
Julie Read, VPC member, stated she has concerns about the school capacity issue and
the fact that some of the students could be going to Cave Creek Schools. She stated
that a neighborhood elementary school builds a sense of community. Ms. Read asked
what the target market will be for this development. Ms. Demmitt states they are still
trying to identify the target. Julie Read asked how many children there are in Sonoran
Gate. A resident in the audience who lives in Sonoran Gate stated about 1 in 8 homes
have kids.
Michelle Ricart, VPC member, stated that Sonoran Gate has a lot of amenities for kids
so there might not be a lot of kids right now but they can come. She stated she is
concerned with the school capacity. She said that it is at least a 20 to 25-minute drive to
the closest Cave Creek elementary school by car, so it would be even longer by bus.
Susan Demmitt stated that Taylor Morrison is committed to working with the school
districts to find a solution.
Michelle Ricart, VPC member, stated she is concerned about school buses going in and
out of the neighborhood with the traffic and the speeds vehicles travel along Sonoran
Desert Drive. She also stated open enrollment can be deceiving because students can
get kicked out of the school.
The floor was open to public comment.
Michelle Kelly, resident, stated she was opposed to the request. She stated she is
concerned about the density. She stated she lives in Sonoran Foothills, which is lower
in density than the proposed project. She stated that Sonoran Foothills Elementary land
was gifted by the developer. She is concerned about police and fire response times.
She stated the project is too dense without the proper infrastructure in place.
Burt Bragin, resident, voiced his concerns about Sonoran Desert Drive and the current
traffic. He stated the connection to the 303 needs to be made before the project is
approved. He stated Sonoran Foothills has 1,300 homes and a school was gifted by the
developer. He stated this development has 6 to 7 times more homes that Sonoran Gate.
Susan Demmitt, applicant, stated that Deer Valley Schools doesn’t want a school site at
this location.
Cynthia Wise, resident, stated she is in favor of the request. She said Taylor Morrison
did a great job with the current infrastructure improvements within Sonoran Gate.
Gary Kirkilas, resident, stated he is a park steward for the Apache Wash trailhead. He
stated this development would change the entire character of the area. He then asked
the developer how they will make it look like the preserve.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 675
J.R. Oliver, resident, stated she lives in Sonoran Foothills and has to wait a long time to
get out of her subdivision. She stated the connection to the 303 would help a lot.
Susan Demmitt, applicant, stated that is more of a regional issue and to talk to the City’s
Street Transportation Department.
Sue Pierce, resident, stated she opposes the project and is a resident of Desert
Enclave. She said on the way to the meeting they had to wait until 56 cars went by to
turn out. She stated this development will have an adverse reaction on the desert
wildlife and preserve area. She stated this development is in contradiction of the
Sonoran Preserve Master Plan.
L. Chicchillo, resident, stated the current Taylor Morrison project looks like row houses.
He stated he lives in Desert Enclave and is worried about the traffic.
Spero Papos, resident, asked if the land had been purchased. The applicant confirmed
it had not been purchased yet. He inquired about traffic lights.
Julie Read, VPC member asked if the applicant has met with ADOT because they
would like to see more information about the project.
There was then a committee discussion about how Dove Valley Road, Cave Creek
Road and 27th Avenue all get flooded out in the monsoon storms.
Tim Mitten, VPC member, stated that the North Gateway minutes will be forwarded onto
the Desert View VPC with their packet so they are aware of the discussion that took
place.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 676
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-75-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting December 7, 2021
Request From RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District) and S-1 DCOD (Ranch or
Farm Residence, Desert Character Overlay District)
Request To RE-35 (Single-Family Residence District), RE-35 DCOD
(Single-Family Residence District, Desert Character
Overlay District) and S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence)
Proposed Use Modify the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD)
boundaries to modify a portion from Sub-District A to
Sub-District B and to remove a portion of property from
Sub-District A to allow for single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #3 – Information Only – GPA-DSTV-1-18-2,
Item #4 – Information Only – Z-62-18-2, and Item #5 – Information Only – Z-TA-5-18-2.
Committee member Reginal Younger arrived to the meeting and Committee member
Jason Israel left the meeting during this item, bringing the quorum to 11 members.
10 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve, will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes per
acre, and will have 7 miles of trails and community paths. She discussed the
application requests to rezone to PUD, amend the General Plan, and amend the Desert
Character Overlay District. She also discussed the extension and build out of Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt also discussed the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife
Federation (NWF). She discussed the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. She noted the NWF landscape palette, pedestrian
circulation, and open edge plan.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 677
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave asked about the cost of the extension of Sonoran Desert
Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that Verdin’s contribution will only be for a portion of the
extension. She stated that as other developers build along Sonoran Desert Drive they
will have their own contribution requirements.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that the North Land Use Plan should be considered in
addition to the General Plan. He stated that the developer should consider building less
than 1000 units. He added that the development will generate traffic and overload
schools. Susan Demmitt stated that the development will have a maximum of 3 units
per acre, which is consistent with developments adjacent to the preserve. She stated
that they are in discussion with the Deer Valley School District and the development is
within the boundary for Desert Mountain schools, which have capacity. She stated that
Cave Creek schools also have capacity.
Committee member Rick Nowell asked about traffic lights on Sonoran Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt stated that a traffic study is being completed and that there will most
likely be a traffic signal at the main entrance of the development in the future.
Committee member Rick Nowell stated that he had concerns that the project has
returned after a couple years, but not decreased the density.
Committee member Rick Powell asked about the cost of the extension of Sonoran
Desert Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that the cost estimate for the full extension of
Sonoran Desert Drive is approximately $120 million. She stated that the build out will
take place when the traffic demand exists and the funding is available. Committee
member Rick Powell stated that the development is not in line with the character of the
area.
Committee member Reginald Younger asked how close homes will be to Sonoran
Desert Drive. Susan Demmitt stated the development’s property line is adjacent to
Sonoran Desert Drive, but the site will have landscape buffers. Committee member
Reginald Younger stated that he is hoping for less density on site.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that the Desert View Character Plan should also be
take into account and to meet the character of the area, density should be decreased or
the development proposal be moved closer to the core. He added that Desert Mountain
and Cave Creek schools are too far from the development.
Committee member Jill Hankins asked if a flood analysis had been completed for the
site. Susan Demmitt stated that the site is not proposing development in the
established flood corridor or flood zone. Nguyen Lam, representative with Hilgart
Wilson, stated that the drainage corridors have mapped floodplains and are subject to
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). He added that the developer will
work with the City to appropriately address the flood zones. Committee member Jill
Hankins stated that she had concerns with additional hardscape in the area.
Committee member Michelle Santoro stated that she appreciates the design, open
space, and connectivity proposed by the development.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 678
Daniel Centilli, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve and various trail running
groups, stated that developers see the area as a transportation corridor, but residents
see it as a recreation corridor. He added that the development will reduce quality of life.
He stated that other residential projects in the area have increased trash and traffic.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, stated that he appreciated the
partnership with the NWF and proposed trails and access. He added that the Desert
Character Overlay is tied to the preserve and should be retained.
Sue Pierce, a resident of Desert Enclave, stated that the area is exploding with
development, especially with the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company
(TSMC), but residential development will lead to increased traffic. She stated that traffic
issues are already complicated in the area and there is no plan from the development
about how to alleviate the issue. She added that major transportation will lead to
additional noise pollution. She stated that there is an opportunity to preserve the area
as a tranquil space in the Sonoran Preserve.
Susanne Rothwell, a member of the Phoenix Mountain Preservation Council,
expressed concerns regarding amending the Desert Character Overlay. She added
that the developer should keep 50% of the land as native and homes should be low
scale. She also expressed concerns with the lack of parking if a trailhead is provided on
site.
James Gaston, a resident of Tuscana at Tatum Ranch, questioned how the
development will deal with increases in water and sewer usage.
Bob Thompson, a member of the public, stated that he was opposed to the
development and instead wanted to preserve the area as natural preserve. He also
expressed concerns with traffic and density.
Scott Coll, a member of the public, expressed concerns with traffic. He added that
there is a need to preserve the preserve area.
Crystal Lehman, a member of the public, stated that Sonoran Desert Drive is a
pleasant driving experience as is and expanding the roadway and increasing homes
takes away from the beauty of the desert.
Rebecca Rodriguez, a local hiker, trail runner, and mountain biker, stated that she
enjoys the beautiful views and wildlife in the area. She expressed concerns with
increased noise from the roadway.
Paul Grayczyk, president of the Sonoran Gate Home Owner’s Association, stated the
he understands the area will develop eventually, but expressed concerns with density
and traffic. He added that the development should be set back further from Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt stated that she had no additional comments or responses at this time,
but will continue dialogue with the community going forward.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 679
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that Sonoran Desert Drive will increase to 6 lanes,
but that does not mean that the preserve area cannot be preserved. Committee
member Jill Hankins also expressed the need to retain open spaces in the City.
Committee member Rick Powell stated that he believes development should be
slower and the area kept more natural.
Committee member Reginald Younger stated that he likes the look of Sonoran Desert
Drive as is and hopes that development will allow that to be retained. He also
expressed concerns with increased density.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 680
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-75-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting April 2, 2019
Request Modify the Desert Character Overlay District for
approximately 638 acres to modify a portion from Sub-
District A to Sub-District B and to remove a portion of
property from Sub-District A
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, gave a presentation of the case up to this point in time. She
stated that they started this process back in August. Ms. Demmitt went through the
General Plan history of the area, along with the Desert Character Overlay District
establishment. She summarized the infrastructure improvements that would be required
for the subdivision to be built. Ms. Demmitt went on to describe the comments the
developer is receiving from members of the public. The first comment was that the
property should stay S-1. Ms. Demmitt stated that staying S-1 would be one home per
acre. Having a subdivision with multiple sized lots/homes would be more affordable for
residents to live in proximity to the preserve.
The next comment from the public that was addressed is the condition of Sonoran
Desert Drive. Ms. Demmitt stated they are working with the City and the State Land
Department to evaluate. She went on to present pages form the 2002 council report that
indicated that at full capacity, Sonoran Desert Drive will be able to handle 50,000 cars a
day. The road was intended to be a major thoroughfare.
The next concern Ms. Demmitt addressed was the acquisition of Sonoran Preserve
Land. She went on to state that the MacEwen property has been privately held since the
1950’s. Taylor Morrison is agreeable to put a public trail through the center of the
property, adjacent to the wash corridor, to connect the preserve north and south of
Sonoran Desert Drive. She stated they will comply with the Sonoran Edge Treatment
Guidelines. Ms. Demmitt stated the City’s Park and Recreation Department is currently
looking at acquiring the land to the east of the MacEwen parcel for preserve.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 681
Lou Lagrave stated that he understands that Sonoran Desert Drive is intended to be a
six-lane arterial and the General Plan on the southern two-thirds of the property has the
land use designation that supports the proposed density but that he still has concerns.
Mr. Lagrave stated that he is concerned about the traffic on Sonoran Desert Drive, how
the kids will get to school and the proposed lot sizes.
Susan Demmitt addressed Mr. Lagrave and stated that they are looking into what they
can do to alleviate some of the concerns regarding Sonoran Desert Drive but the
construction of the southern leg is 47 million dollars. She stated that the kids that live in
this development will have the option of attending either Deer Valley Schools or Cave
Creek Schools. She stated that both school districts will be providing bus service into
the neighborhood.
Jill Hankins asked if the Mesquite Wash is a 404 wash. Susan Demmitt referred to
Nguyen Lam on her development team. Mr. Lam stated they are disturbing less than an
acre and it is not within the 404-protected area. Ms. Hankins asked if there have been
any studies done regarding cultural items or protected species. Mr. Lam stated the
studies have been done and nothing was found.
Doug Dickson stated that the committee has received many emails opposition and not
one in support. Doug Dickson stated that they should talk to State Land about swapping
this parcel for a better suited piece of land. He asked if the applicant had explored this
option. Ms. Demmitt stated that the City hasn’t identified this piece of land as preserve
land, but they have not discussed a swap with State Land.
Steve Bowser stated that the committee has letters in front of them in opposition from
the Sierra Club and PMPC.
Steve Bowser read the cards in opposition that didn’t wish to speak.
The floor was opened for public comment.
Debra Sedillo Dugan, resident, stated she has concerns about the traffic and views. She
said the signs were posted where no one could see them until the applicant recently
moved them.
John Furniss, resident, stated he is the Chair of the Phoenix Mountain Preserve
Committee for the Parks and Recreation Department. He said there should be a letter
from their committee to deny this project. He stated that they aren’t opposed to growth,
but this will set precedence and that we need to protect what he have.
Stacie Beute, resident, stated she is opposed to the request. She has been a longtime
friend to the Phoenix Mountain Preserve and advises on committees. She said that
Taylor Morrison will be selling the homes with the added amenity of the proximity to the
preserve, but they are developing on the preserve. She stated she is concerned about
the impacts on the environment.
Amanda Farr, resident, stated that Sonoran Desert Drive is currently a safe place to
cycle and run. If this development is approved, it will no longer be safe.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 682
Gary Kirkilas, resident, stated that he is a Park Steward for the Phoenix Mountain
Preserve. He stated that he started the Save Our Sonoran Preserve group as an
advocacy group in response to the request. He stated that the proposal isn’t consistent
with the North Land Use Plan and the Desert View Character Plan. Mr. Kirkilas urged
the committee that if it doesn’t make sense, say no to the proposal.
Daniel Centilli, resident, stated that he is a Desert Ridge homeowner. He said the
current DCOD overlay prevents something like this proposal from happening. He stated
that the applicant is asking for exceptions to the law. He went on to state the preserve is
our legacy.
Patrick Havley, resident, thanked the committee. He stated he is concerned for the
safety of cyclists on Sonoran Desert Drive. He also stated this project won’t contribute
to the overall good of the City.
Gannon Burleigh, resident, said that he is opposed and has concerns about traffic,
schools and the impact on the preserve. He said that the project is irresponsible
development and that the removal of the overlay district that protects the preserve is
ridiculous.
Laura Jones, resident, stated she has concerns about the traffic on Sonoran Desert
Drive. She stated the development should be one acre lots to preserve the wildlife.
Patrick McMullen, resident, states that he is the President of the PMPC. He stated that
the Phoenix Mountain Preserve Council has been around since the 1970’s to preserve
the desert. He stated that PMPC is opposed to the request.
Mandy Fellows, resident, passed out a study from an ASU professor concerning the
ecological impact and flooding concerns in the area. She stated that this area is
downstream from three dams, with the closest dam being 1.5 miles away.
John Trojan, resident, stated he is opposed to the request with concerns about traffic,
pedestrian safety and allowing the developer to craft their own zoning standards.
Lainy Porter, resident, stated she moved to Arizona for pain management. She stated
that she trains for triathlons on Sonoran Desert Drive and is concerned about the
increase in traffic.
Claudia Wagner, resident, stated she is a trail runner and has concerns about the
danger the increased traffic with cause on Sonoran Desert Drive. She is also concerned
about the potential for flooding.
Heather Larson, resident, stated she is concerned about the increase in traffic and
pedestrian safety.
Tim Holt, resident, said that he moved to Phoenix from Seattle. He said this proposal is
just setting precedence and the next development will be even more dense. Mr. Holt
went on to state this project is about money and greed.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 683
Brett Scholar, resident, stated that he uses Sonoran Desert Drive to run and cycle. He
questioned the benefit the applicant will bring to the area. He stated that the property
should stay as it is currently zoned.
Lindsey Tillman, resident, stated she is opposed to the request. She said that the City
needs to protect the Sonoran Preserve.
Susan Beccian, resident, stated that she is one of the only people that have received
letters about this case but didn’t receive one concerning the meeting tonight. She said
she is concerned that Gammage and Burnham isn’t being upfront with the community.
Cassandra Leone, resident, thanked her neighbors for coming out to oppose the zoning
request. She said she is concerned about pedestrian safety and the traffic on Sonoran
Desert Drive. She said she has read the PUD and has concerns about the sustainability
section.
Michelle Kelley, resident, stated that she is opposed to the request. She commented
that just because a plan is 30 years old doesn’t mean it’s not a good plan. It means the
community and the planning department were visioning long term. This request doesn’t
comply with the Desert View Character Plan. Ms. Kelley went on to state that the school
is over capacity and there is no real plan from the applicant to resolve that issue. She
closed by stating the area should be preserved and the plans should not be changed.
Sue Pierce, resident, stated that she is opposed to the request. Ms. Pierce went on to
state that this project is going to be a financial burden on taxpayers. Even though the
applicant must pay to extend infrastructure, the taxpayers pay to maintain this
infrastructure that is being extended to only serve this subdivision.
Christine Severance, resident, stated that that the signs for the hearing were posted far
from the road so they couldn’t be read. She stated the applicant purchased the property
with the current zoning and that it shouldn’t be changed.
Karen Severance, resident, stated that the preserve means a lot to her. She urged the
committee to think about the ecosystem when they vote on this case at a later date.
Jennifer Severance, resident, stated that nature needs to have space. The edges of the
preserve are important.
Karl Mar, resident, stated that he is opposed to the request. He said that the
infrastructure can’t handle a development of this size.
Patty Killinger, resident, stated that she has been in the area since the 1970’s. She said
that the parcel’s adjacency to the Sonoran Preserve is important.
Anna Lewandowski, resident, stated she just found out about the project about two
weeks ago and came to the meeting to learn more about it. She said from listening to
the applicant’s presentation and the testimony of the public, it sounds like this
development is 10 years too soon. The current infrastructure and school systems can’t
handle the residents this development will generate.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 684
Mike Rooney, resident, stated this project is political. This development is not consistent
with the Desert View Character Plan.
Patricia Story, resident, stated that she is concerned for public safety in the areas. She
said the area already has an emergency response time issue.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 685
Attachment D
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-75-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting November 6, 2018
Request Modify the Desert Character Overlay District for
approximately 638 acres to modify a portion from Sub-
District A to Sub-District B and to remove a portion of
property from Sub-District A
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, presented the information to the Village regarding MacEwen
480. She addressed the history of the site and the current requests to ultimately build
1,420 homes. She addressed that a portion of the 480 acres is within the Desert
Character Overlay District and the North Land Use Plan.
Lou Lagrave had questions regarding the alignment of Sonoran Desert Drive. He stated
it is a nice development in the wrong location and that there is no justification for the
density. He stated that according to the North Land Use Plan that this area is intended
to be 2 dwelling units per acre or less.
Rick Nowell clarified that the applicant would only be adding one lane in front of their
own development, not the entire length of Sonoran Desert Drive. He stated it is a nice
project in the wrong place. He stated that Sanctuary at Desert Ridge is unsightly and he
doesn’t want to see that in this location.
Rick Powell asked which school district in which the property is located. Ms. Demmitt
said Deer Valley.
Steve Bowser asked how long the land has been privately held. Ms. Demmitt stated
since the 1950’s.
Ryan Schaefer asked if the developer was contributing to the Sonoran Desert Drive
alignment. Ms. Demmitt said the subdivision will be contributing to impact fees.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 686
Jill Hankins expressed concern about the safety of the cyclists on Sonoran Desert
Drive. She stated there needs to be an underpass and islands for the bikers.
Steve Bowser opened the meeting to public comment.
Richard Puleri, resident, stated he has concerns about the current traffic congestion on
Sonoran Desert Drive and inquired on when Sonoran Desert Drive will be expanded
and connected.
Michael Kaciemba, resident, stated he lives in Sonoran Foothills and that he has
concerns about the current traffic congestion. He stated that this project shouldn’t be
improved until the streets are expanded. He also addressed the school doesn’t have
capacity.
Public comment closed.
Reginald Younger said that Taylor Morrison expanded the roads with Sky Crossing.
Rick Powell states he has concerns about the school capacity.
Deanna Chew asked if residents would have a City of Phoenix address. Ms. Demmitt
stated she believes they will.
Rick Nowell asked if a traffic study has been done. Ms. Demmitt says it was recently
completed but has not been submitted to the City yet.
There was a brief committee discussion concerning the possibility of age restriction
subdivisions within the development.
Louis Lagrave stated he believes in land rights but this needs to come back with R1-10
zoning. Louis Lagrave also requested staff send out the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 687
Attachment E
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-75-18-2
Date of VPC Meeting March 10, 2022
Request From RE-35 DCOD A (Single-Family Residence District,
Desert Character Overlay District, Sub-District A) and S-
1 DCOD A (Ranch or Farm Residence, Desert Character
Overlay District, Sub-District A)
Request To RE-35 (Single-Family Residence District), RE-35 DCOD
B (Single-Family Residence District, Desert Character
Overlay District, Sub-District B) and S-1 (Ranch or Farm
Residence)
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation to approve the
staff recommended area in Z-TA-5-18-2
VPC Vote 4-1
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #4 – Z-TA-5-18-2, Item #6 – GPA-DSTV-18-
2, and Item #7 – Z-62-18-2.
10 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Julianna Pierre provided information regarding Z-TA-5-18-2, a text amendment to
revise the applicability area and associated text for the Desert Maintenance Overlay
District (DMOD) of the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD). She explained the
permitted uses and standards for the two sub-districts in the DMOD, Sub-District A and
Sub-District B. She explained that the southern boundary of the DMOD aligns with the
Northeast Outerloop Freeway alignment outlined in the Peripheral Areas C and D Plan.
Julianna Pierre explained that applicant’s proposed modifications would remove Sub-
District A standards from the property south of Sonoran Desert Drive and west of Cave
Creek Wash. Additionally, the land south of Sonoran Desert Drive and east of Cave
Creek Wash, currently in Sub-District A, would become part of Sub-District B. She
stated that staff’s recommendation is to only remove Sub-District A standards from an
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 688
approximately 155.06-acre portion of the original request. She added that the text
amendment also includes changes to the Zoning Ordinance and the staff
recommendation is for approval of Z-TA-5-18-2 to amend the applicability area and
associated text for the DMOD of the DCOD as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report.
Julianna Pierre explained that Z-75-18-2 is the rezoning case associated with the
aforementioned text amendment and would remove the DCOD designation from the
zoning districts. She explained that the applicant proposed and staff recommended
areas were identical to those in Z-TA-5-18-2, but the staff recommendation for Z-75-18-
2 is denial as filed, approval of the staff recommended area.
Julianna Pierre explained that GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 was a request from Preserves /
Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre,
Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre, and Preserves / Floodplain to Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre
/ Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Preserves / Floodplain, with removal of
the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (IPO). She explained that the IPO acted as a timing
element to ensure growth was concentrated within the Infrastructure Limit Line (ILL), a
guide to where the City would extend water and sewer infrastructure to support
development. She stated that significant investment and development has occurred
within the boundaries of the ILL and there are opportunities to revisit the overlay and
reassess development beyond the ILL. She added that staff is recommending approval
of GPA-DSTV-1-18-2.
Julianna Pierre stated that Z-62-18-2 is a rezoning request of 488.63 acres at the
southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive from S-1
DCOD, S-1, and RE-35 DCOD to PUD DCOD (pending PUD) and PUD. She added
that the proposed PUD will allow single-family residential development.
Julianna Pierre stated that the development is proposing a master-planned residential
community with a maximum 1,420 units at a density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre.
There will be a collection of single-family neighborhoods with various amenities, open
spaces, and a pedestrian network. She also discussed the permitted uses, connectivity
to the adjacent Sonoran Preserve, open space, and amenities.
Julianna Pierre reviewed the community input received since 2018, which included 82
letters in opposition and 6 letters in support. She stated that the letters in opposition
expressed concerns regarding: road infrastructure, increased traffic, decreased resident
safety, preserve areas not maintained for outdoor activities, negative impacts on the
area’s natural flora and fauna, maintaining the requirements for the DCOD, density,
number of units, water resources, Sonoran Desert Drive remaining a scenic corridor, the
proposed development not matching the character of the area, strain on the school
district, and lack of amenities to support the development.
Julianna Pierre reviewed the staff finding and stipulations for Z-62-18-2, noting that
Stipulation No. 1 had corrections to the PUD name and date stamped date. She added
that staff recommended approval, subject to stipulations.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve and will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 689
per acre. She discussed the history of applicable plans that apply to the site, such as
the DMCO, Peripheral Areas C and D Plan, and Phoenix General Plan. She explained
that the Verdin property was always intended to develop as residential. She also
discussed the eventual build out of Sonoran Desert Drive and the infrastructure
improvements that Verdin developers will build along Sonoran Desert Drive. She also
noted that developers are working with the Deer Valley Unified School District.
Alex Steadman, representative with RVi, stated that the Verdin development will have
a unique vision and design approach. He discussed the partnership with the National
Wildlife Federation (NWF), noting the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. He discussed the certified habitat open space areas,
specifically the preserved habitat, re-established habitat, and maintained open space.
He stated that the playscapes will include nature trails with education nodes, parks,
trailheads, informative signage, and community amenities. He also provided an
example of the NWF landscape palette.
Alex Steadman also discussed the pedestrian circulation and edge openness plans.
He stated that the development will have an open trailhead for the public, which
includes public parking, community gathering spaces, and access to water. He added
that there will be a variable edge adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve and Mesquite Wash.
He also noted that the Verdin PUD provides parallels to the DCOD.
Vice Chair Shannon Simon appreciated the thoughtful design of the development and
stated that the project was high quality.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, provided a presentation and
discussed the importance of the DCOD. He stated that the DCOD was intended to
maintain the fragile undisturbed areas of the wildlife corridor along the Cave Creek
Wash, a major floodway and floodplain. He added that the Zoning Ordinance discusses
how development in the DCOD should blend with the undisturbed desert environment
rather than dominate it. He added the DCOD states that the Dynamite Boulevard
alignment acts as the southern boundary, and makes no reference to Sonoran Desert
Drive. He added that moving the DCOD boundary further north eliminates the purpose
of the overlay.
Patrick McMullen, President of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council,
appreciated the applicant linking the development to the Sonoran Preserve, but still had
concerns regarding removal of the DCOD, especially when the DCOD would dictate the
number of units permitted on the site. He also expressed concerns regarding the width
of the trail along the Mesquite Wash.
Susanne Rothwell, a member of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, stated
that the Sonoran Collaborative assisted with writing the DCOD chapter of the Zoning
Ordinance and there was an enormous amount of research regarding the fragile
corridors in the area. She requested lower density and single-story residences. She
added that DCOD should remain in place.
Ann Wilde, a member of the public, stated that development should not affect the
desert character. She stated that development should occur with the DCOD in place.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 690
Cynthia Weiss, a resident of Sonoran Gate, the closest residential development to
Verdin, appreciated Verdin’s thoughtful development.
Kara Nicholls, a member of the public who lives adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve,
stated that she was excited about Verdin providing a connection to the northern and
southern portions of the Preserve. She appreciated the NWF collaboration and stated
this development will aid in home ownership since homes on an acre are unobtainable
for many.
Rob Nash-Boulden, a member of the public, asked the Village Planning Committee to
reconsider and deny the request to remove the DCOD from the site. He stated that the
DCOD should be retained. He also expressed concern that the development will be
built with no close connections to services.
Robert Thompson, a member of the public, disagreed with the change in zoning.
Jennifer Ruby, a member of the public, stated that Verdin will be a vibrant place for
people to live. She noted that the project is low density and thoughtful with accessible
housing.
Keeli Keeler, a member of the public, stated that the DCOD should remain in place and
that the proposed number of units will change the desert character.
Susan Demmitt stated that standards outlined in the DCOD have been taken into
account and worked into the Verdin project. She added that the land adjacent to
Sonoran Desert Drive is expected to develop in the future and Verdin will act as a
precedent for what’s to come.
MOTION: Committee member Daniel Tome made a motion to approve Z-75-18-2, per
the staff recommendation to approve the staff recommended area in Z-TA-5-18-2. The
motion was seconded by Committee member Michelle Ricart.
VOTE: 4-1 with Committee members Simon, Kreiger, Ricart, and Tome in favor and
Chair Stokes in opposition.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 691
Attachment F
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-75-18-2
Date of VPC Meeting April 5, 2022
Request From RE-35 DCOD A (Single-Family Residence District,
Desert Character Overlay District, Sub-District A) and S-
1 DCOD A (Ranch or Farm Residence, Desert Character
Overlay District, Sub-District A)
Request To RE-35 (Single-Family Residence District), RE-35 DCOD
B (Single-Family Residence District, Desert Character
Overlay District, Sub-District B) and S-1 (Ranch or Farm
Residence)
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC Recommendation Deny as filed, approved per the staff recommendation to
approve the staff recommended area in Z-TA-5-18-2
VPC Vote 7-4
VPC DISCUSSION:
Cases Z-TA-5-18-2, Z-75-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, and Z-62-18-2 were heard
concurrently.
Five requests to speak in favor and five requests to speak in opposition were made for
this request.
Committee member Reginald Younger joined during this item, bringing quorum to 10.
Committee member Jill Hankins joined during this item, bringing quorum to 11.
Committee member Mark Warren joined during this item, bringing quorum to 12.
Committee member Reginald Younger left during this item, bringing quorum to 11.
Staff Presentation
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 692
Julianna Pierre, staff, provided a combined presentation for companion cases Z-TA-5-
18-2, Z-75-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, and Z-62-18-2. Ms. Pierre reviewed the history of
the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD) and the alignment of Sonoran Desert
Drive. She explained that staff recommends a more limited area to be removed from the
DOCD, as shown on the map in the staff report. She explained that the Z-75-18-2 case
mirrors the text amendment case, updating the zoning designation to remove the
overlay district, and that staff recommends denial as filed, approval of the staff
recommended area. Ms. Pierre went on to review the General Plan Amendment,
describing the history and purpose of the designations, noting that staff recommends
approval. She then provided an overview of the PUD proposal in Rezoning Case Z-62-
18-2, reviewing the land use proposal and site plan, connectivity proposal, open space
provisions, and amenities. She discussed the community input that has been received
and summarized written materials. Finally, she noted that staff recommends approval
with stipulations.
Applicant Presentation
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, summarized the history of
the site and planning efforts for the proposed project. She stated that the subject site is
private property and has never been designated to be part of a preserve area. She
reviewed the surrounding area, summarized the applicant’s proposal, and discussed
new proposed stipulations that she suggested the committee incorporate into its
approval. She summarized the purpose of the Desert Character Overlay District and
stated that the impact of removing the overlay would allow a master planned community
with density spread to the whole site.
Alex Stedman, representative with RVi, discussed the design approach and
relationship to the surrounding open space, including the partnership with the National
Wildlife Federation. He shared a map that indicated the proposed certified habitat open
spaces within the site, discussed the proposed landscape palette and plant list, and
stated that the Mesquite Wash would serve as a connector between the north and south
portions of the preserve. He reviewed the edge openness plan and the design of open
edges with public trail access points. Finally, he described the elements of the DCOD
that have been incorporated into the design of the development.
Susan Demmitt described the additional stipulations – which include a reduced density
limit, elimination of the smallest lot size, an additional open space buffer along the
eastern property line, public access easements at certain locations, and a multi-use trail
easement along the wash corridor – proposed by the applicant and requested that the
committee incorporate the additional stipulations into their approval. Additionally, she
stated that the subject site has always been designated for development in the City’s
General Plan and the proposed density is within the limits of the designation and that
the applicant hopes to set a good example of appropriate development in this corridor.
Committee Questions
Vice Chair Lagrave asked about the designation of 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre in
the General Plan Amendment, which is not necessary to facilitate the proposed project.
He further asked about the southeast corner and if it would make sense to donate the
land to the Parks and Recreation Department.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 693
Susan Demmitt replied that the applicant would be open to removing the General Plan
classification of 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and that the applicant would be willing to
work with the Parks and Recreation Department on a dedication of the southeast corner
of the site if it was of interest to the City.
Committee Member Nowell asked about the development parcel allocation table in
which the numbers for individual parcels do not add up to the total for the full site. Ms.
Demmitt replied that the individual parcels have flexibility in the unit totals, but the
overall total cannot exceed the maximum for the full site.
Mr. Nowell asked if homeowners would be prohibited from planting non-native plants.
Mr. Stedman replied that individual homeowners would be required to follow the plant
list for the PUD. Committee Member Reynolds added that rear yard plant prohibitions
are possible and are done in other communities, asking further if fruit trees will be
prohibited in the community. Mr. Stedman replied that the applicant team would explore
the idea.
Mr. Nowell asked how many lots would be affected by the base flood elevation and how
much those houses would need to be elevated.
Nguyen Lam, representative with Hilgart Wilson, replied that it would primarily be lots
fronting on the Mesquite Wash, but they don’t have a precise number since the parcels
haven’t been finalized. He added that they would raise the houses to 1 foot above the
base flood elevation.
Ms. Reynolds asked if the natural preservation areas will be marked so the community
knows where they are. Mr. Stedman replied that they have discussed signage with the
NWF and there are opportunities to do signage. Ms. Demmitt added that the applicant
wants the public to recognize that these are public benefits.
Committee Member Kollar asked for clarification on the DCOD removal area. Ms.
Pierre replied that staff is recommending only the Verdin site be removed from the
DCOD at this time and any other sites would need to be evaluated on a case-by-case
basis. Ms. Demmitt added that the package of commitments from the specific PUD
justifies the removal of the DCOD.
Mr. Nowell asked for clarification on making motions with amendments. Vice Chair
Lagrave replied that the committee can make the appropriate amendments in their
motions.
Public Comments
Gary Kirkilas introduced himself and provided a history of the DCOD, noting that its
purpose was to maintain the Cave Creek Wash. He stated that the entire Cave Creek
Wash needs to be protected and that the DCOD boundaries should be at the Dynamite
Boulevard alignment, not moved to the north. He further stated that DCOD only applies
to one-third of the property, allowing the developer to build on the site without removing
the DCOD. He stated that he believes the committee should vote yes on development
but keep the DCOD in place.
Donald Bessler introduced himself and stated that he believes this is a property rights
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 694
issue and that more housing should be built, adding that he supports the proposal and
believes it will be a good product.
Susanne Rothwell introduced herself and stated that the Desert View Village Planning
Committee voted in favor of the DCOD when it was originally written. She stated that
everyone was in favor of it at the time and it was a great piece of planning and
legislation.
Brian Sullivan introduced himself, noting that he has worked and spent much time in
the preserve area, and stated that there are maps that show this area designated for
acquisition and preservation. He stated that minimizing density would limit the impact to
wildlife and that preserving the flats is important.
Sue Pierce introduced herself and stated the concern that the work that goes into
making plans can be easily reversed by a developer who doesn’t have a full
understanding of the issues.
Kara Nicholls introduced herself and stated that Phoenix needs attainable housing
because of its rapid growth rate. She noted that people are having trouble finding
homes in the area and that the developer has done a great job with the proposed
development.
Jennifer Ruby introduced herself and stated that the proposed development is a great
opportunity for the community and that it would provide housing for all the new jobs
coming to the north Phoenix area.
Cynthia Weiss introduced herself and stated that she supports the proposal because
there are other active families that want to live in this location near all of the open space
amenities.
James Gaston introduced himself and stated that he does not agree with removing the
DCOD and believes one home per acre is appropriate. He further noted that there is
academic research, stating concerns about groundwater issues in regard to
overdevelopment.
Sara Altieri introduced herself and stated that she knew the area would change over
time when she bought a home nearby. She stated that the development incorporates
sensitivity to natural wildlife.
Applicant Response
Susan Demmitt stated that she feels the applicant has addressed the concerns and
would be happy to discuss any follow up questions.
Committee Discussion
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that he was originally in favor of the R1-10 designation and
that he is concerned about keeping the DCOD in the northern portion because it would
push more density into the southern portion. He stated that he believes the
development will allow wildlife to flourish and that he supports the project.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 695
Committee Member Israel asked if there is a current allowance for housing on the site.
Vice Chair Lagrave replied that there is.
Committee Member Powell stated that this site is far from the 101 and I-17 freeways
and should be the lowest density. He stated the concern about other sites along the
corridor seeking higher densities, adding that he doesn’t believe the request is in
character and is not in favor of moving the DCOD line. He further stated that the homes
in this development will not be affordable or attainable and that there is room in other
parts of the village that could be developed at higher densities, closer to the freeway.
Committee Member Santoro stated that the PUD is very thorough and thoughtful and
that she appreciates the reduction in density. She stated that she does not agree with
the current alignment of the DCOD line and that the majority of the property is in
alignment with the DCOD guidelines.
Committee Member Nowell stated that he believes the proposal is a good
compromise, even though it is not perfect, adding that he would like to see the approved
plant include particular restrictions in the back yards of individual homes.
Chair Bowser stated that it is important to remember that the proposal is to eliminate
the DCOD at the site in exchange for an entire new set of rules outlined in the PUD. He
further stated that one house per acre is not a desirable type of development, noting the
downsides to one-acre lot development, including that it’s not walkable and people do
not know their neighbors.
Committee Member Hankins stated that she would be in favor of the development if it
were closer to existing infrastructure and that she is concerned about the costs of
infrastructure driving up home prices.
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that affordable housing is typically found in other parts of the
city and that he believes that infrastructure costs will be lower for future developments.
MOTION – Z-75-18-2
Committee Member Warren made a motion to deny Z-75-18-2 as filed, and approve
per the staff recommendation. Vice Chair Lagrave seconded the motion.
VOTE
7-4, motion to deny as filed, approve per staff recommendation passed; Members Dean,
Israel, Kollar, Santoro, Warren, Lagrave, and Bowser in favor; Members Hankins,
Nowell, Powell, and Reynolds against.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 696
Attachment G
ADDENDUM A
Staff Report: Z-75-18-2
April 26, 2022
North Gateway Village Planning March 10, 2022
Committee Meeting Date
Desert View Village Planning April 5, 2022
Committee Meeting Date
Planning Commission Hearing Date May 5, 2022
Request From RE-35 DCOD-A (Single-Family Residence
District, Desert Character Overlay District, Sub-
District A) (10.25 acres) and S-1 DCOD-A
(Ranch or Farm Residence, Desert Character
Overlay District, Sub-District A) (144.81 acres)
Request To RE-35 (Single-Family Residence District)
(10.25 acres) and S-1 (Ranch or Farm
Residence) (144.81 acres)
Proposed Use Modify the boundary of the Desert Character
Overlay District to remove a portion from Sub-
District A
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment
and Sonoran Desert Drive
Owner MacEwen Ranch, LLC and Arizona State Land
Department
Applicant/Representative Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff Recommendation Approval, per Addendum A
Summary
The North Gateway Village Planning Committee (VPC) heard this request on March 10,
2022, and recommended denial as filed, approval per the staff recommendation by a 4-
1 vote. The Desert View VPC heard this request on April 5, 2022, recommended denial
as filed, approval per the staff recommendation by a 7-4 vote.
The applicant’s original request was to rezone 636.24 acres located south of
Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th Street and 32nd Street alignments from RE-35
DCOD-A and S-1 DCOD-A to RE-35, RE-35 DCOD B, and S-1 for a modification of the
boundary of the Desert Character Overlay Districts.
The applicant proposed to modify their request to align with the staff recommendation to
rezone 155.06 acres from RE-35 DCOD-A and S-1 DCOD-A to RE-35 and S-1.
Updated sketch maps are attached to reflect this change.
Page 697
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-75-18-2
April 26, 2022
Conclusion and Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of Z-75-18-2 per Addendum A.
Exhibits
Sketch Map (2 pages)
Page 698
C-1
OF TOWN O F
R1-10 PCD *
CAV E
PCD *
CREE K
7 TH AVE
CARE FREE
CAREFREE HWY Z-131-95
Z-131-95
STA TE R O U TE 7 4 (C A RE FR EE H IG H WAY )
S-1*
C-2 * AN X 33 4
Z- 1 25 -0 1
* Z- 3 5- 05
M ARI CO PA C-2
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
RE-35 *
AN X 18 1
CITY O F
AN X 33 4
R1-1 8
4 0 TH ST
Z- 3 5- 05
PRD *
Z- 3 1- 01 AN X 24 4
CO UN T Y Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
CP/GC P *
MARICOPA COUNTY
AN X 18 1
R1-18 PCD *
CP / G C P
*
Z- 9 0- 01
S-1
R1-1 8
PRD *
SCO TTSDA LE
5 2 ND ST
5 6 TH ST
S-1
Z-131-95
Z- 5 5- 95
MARICOPA
55TH ST
COUN TY S-1
R1-1 8 PRD * AN X 49 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
C-1
*
S-1 MARICO PA
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 PRD *
R-2 *
R-2 *
Z- 5 5- 95
P ho en i x C it y L im it s P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 3 9- 04
Z- 3 8- 04
S-1 * RA
S-1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 3 8- 03
AN X 29 1
NC
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 * * COUNTY
R1-1 8 PRD
Z-112-08
Z- 4 -9 3
HO
R1-1 8 PRD*
R1 -1 8 PR D *
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 4 6- 98
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1 *
S-1
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- S P - 21 -9 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP * R1-1 8 PRD *
PAL
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- 5 5- 95 P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1 *
S-1
O
S-1
AN X 39 5
Z- 8 8- 07
R-3 *
MA
Z-3 3- 12
RE-35 *
Z- 9 8- 92
R1-1 8 PRD *
DO DR
Z- 5 5- 95 S-1 S-1 S-1
Z- 1 73 -0 1 Z- 3 8- 03
S-1 AN X 26 2
AN X 29 1
Z- 4 5- 03
AN X 29 8
D RE-35
VE S-1 R1-18 *
S-1 R1-1 8 PRD * R1-1 8
KR
Z- 1 20 -9 6
PRD *
Z- 7 -9 4
53RD ST
R1-1 8 PRD
VA Z-110-05 Z-145-06
Z-6 8-04
LL S-1 *
PH O - 1 - 17 - - Z - 77 - 16
EE
S-2*
Z- 5 1- 06
EY
S-1 Z- 3 7- 03
S-2 *
ANX 358
AN X 29 0
ANX 445 Z-7 1-06
Z- 7 7- 16
S-1
AN X 34 0
Z- 7 6- 06
R1-18 PRD *
RE-35
Z- 9 3- 94
R1-1 8 *
RD
S-1
CR
Z- 7 -9 4
Z- 6 5- 03
Sub-District A
AN X 29 9
S-1
Z- 4 2- 99
AN X 20 5
Z-58-01 R1-1 0*
Z- 6 7- 15
R1-1 8*
S-1 * S-1
R1 -18 *
Z- 5 7- 15
Z- 2 -1 8 Z- 4 2- 00
C-2 SP
Z- 9 3- 97
AN X 22 8
CA
AN X 27 8
Z- 1 65 -0 2
C-2 SP *
C-2 SP AN X 26 4
RE-35
AN X 27 7 Z- 1 0- 02
RE-35 *
Z- 1 64 -0 2
R1-1 8*
C-2 *
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
C-1 * RE-35
AN X 26 4
Z- 1 04 -0 3
Z- 4 7- 16
Z- 1 0- 02 AN X 40 0 S- 1
PUD
VE
AN X 30 4 Z- 1 32 - 7
C-2 * Z- 9 3- 97
Z- 2 8- 14 AN X 6 4 C-2
Z- 1 61 -9 9
Z- 1 0- 02 C-2 AN X 21 6
AN X 21 8 Z- 1 77 -9 9
Z- 3 2- 00
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-1 8 PRD *
PCD * *
C-2 * Z-5 0-13
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
PC D
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
56TH ST
FH *
Z- 2 9- 02
RE -3 5 *
DE
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
RE-35
R1-6 * R1 -6 *
PCD
PC D
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 C-1 PCD *
Z- 2 37 -G -8 5 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 1 3- 01
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
R1-10 R
SE
RE-35 *
Z- 1 14 -9 5
AN X 17 9
Z-34-13
R-2 *
PC D
MARICO PA
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-8 *
R-2 *
PCD
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 PCD
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5 T RE- 35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
W
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37-A- 85
R-2 PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
RE -35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
IL R1-10
R1-1 8 *
Z- 4 1- 05
LO
C-O /G-O
PCD PCD *
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
Z- 2 37 -H - 8 5 Z-2 37-B- 85
R1 -1 0 *
C-2 * PC D
Z-2 37-A- 85 Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
DIXILETA DR
R1-10
C-2 PCD
DNS /W VR *
Z-2 37-G -85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85 C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
C-2 *
C- 2
PCD*
Z-4 3- 98
PCD *
Z-2 37-D- 85
W
PK
Z-1 20-9 4
C-2
PCD
SP * PU D
Z- 43- 98
Z- 43- A - 98 R-3A Z-3 6 -1 2
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85 R1 -8
PC D *
COUNTY
S-1
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
C-2
PCD *
PCD *
Z-2 37-8 5
C- 2
PC D
SP *
Z-2 37-J- 85 C-2
PCD *
C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37 -G -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
RE-3 5
R1 -6
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
W
R1 -8 *
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-5 6-97
CP / GCP
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-3 3-99
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-B- 85
R1-6
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-C- 85
Z-2 37-E- 85
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -C - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
Y R1 - 8 *
Z-SP-14 -89 R1 -10 *
44TH ST
Z- 1 05 -0 1
Z-6 5 -19
RE -35
42ND ST
CP / BP *
Z-1 08-0 7
S- 1*
AN X 44 4
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
R1-10 *
MARICOPA
R1-6 *
AN X 25 8
Z-1 2 2 -1 4
R1-6 *
Z- 6 -0 2
Z- 4 1- 96
Z-6 4-13 S-1
AN X 4 8 2
RE -35
R1 -6
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
COUNTY
R1-10* Z-2 37 -C -8 5
RE-43
Z-2 37 -E -8 5
Z-6 9 -1 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
PCD
*
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Phoenix City Limits
AN X 21 2
RH PCD
Z- 1 13 -9 9
R1-6 PCD *
P ho en i x C it y L im it s S-1
S-1 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 24 3
Z- 2 0- 01 R1-6
40TH ST
S-1 PCD * R1 -8 *
S-1 SP * Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 22 1 PRD
Z-109-97
AN X 22 1
S-2
Z- 2 9- 00
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 1 50 -0 1
Z- S P - 22 -0 3
AN X 35 1
S-1
PCD *
Z- 1 76 -0 5
7 TH AVE
R1-8 * C-2 * C-1 * S-1
Sub-District B
AN X 22 1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 1 16 -0 7 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
DYNAMITE BLVD
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 7 1- 03 AN X 17 3
R1-1 8 * S-1*
S-1
S-1 Z-5 6- 95 R1 -10 *
AN X 41 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 7 3- 16
AN X 50 8 Z- 4 5- 13
AN X 25 7
Z- 5 -0 2
Ph oe ni x C i ty L i m it s
DY NA M ITE B L VD
C-1 *
R1-18 *
Z-1 25 -9 9
PUD *
Z-2 2- 18
Z-61-06
R1-1 8 *
Z-7 3 -9 7
RE-35
CITY O F
MARICOPA
Pho enix City L imits
TATUM BLVD
Z-58-01 COUNTY
S-1 SO RE-35
N OR R1 -1 0 *
AN
Z- 1 18 -9 4
R1 -1 0 *
Z- 9 7- 94
Z- 1 18 -9 4
S-1*
SCO TTSDA LE
Z-2 6-09
D ES
Phoenix Ctiy Limits
ER
TD
R1-6 *
R1-1 0 * R1-6 * PCD Pho enix City L imits
S-1
PCD Z- 1 46 -9 7
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
RE-35
R
ANX 149 R1-8 *
JOMAX RD
R1 -8 * PCD
PC D
RE-35 *
Z- 9 9- 88
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 9 9- 88
R-2
PCD
*
PCD
* C-2 P CD *
S-1 *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88 Z- 9 9- 88
AN X 50 5
R-2 *
R1-10 *
Z- 9 9- 88
RE - 43
R1-6 *
RE - 43
PCD
S-1
PCD Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 1 46 -9 7
R-2 *
MARICOP A R1-6
PCD
*
PCD S-1
COUNTY R1-6
S-1
R1-6 * Z-61-06 R1-18 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
* Z- 9 9- C - 88
PCD
R1-8 *
PC D * Z- 9 9- 88
R1-6 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- A - 88
R1-8
Z- 9 9- 88
*
PCD PCD *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88 *
YEARLING RD Z-61-06mapservices@phoenix.gov
PC D
Z-61-06 Z-61-06
I
CAREFREE HWY
Z-75-18 DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
Miles
DYNAMITE BLVD
1 0.5 0 1 JOMAX RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD
PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
BLACK MTN PKY
SR-101
MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
FROM:
S-1 DCOD Sub-District A ( 144.81 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
9/29/2021 RE-35 DCOD Sub-District A ( 10.25 a.c.)
Z-75-18 (Per Staff Recommendation) 2/25/2022
REVISION DATES:
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO. S-1 ( 144.81 a.c.)
155.06 Acres Q51-35, Q51-36, Q52-32, Q52-33, R9, R10, Q9,
Q52-34, Q52-36, Q52-37, Q53-30,
Q53-31, Q53-32, Q53-33, Q53-34,
Q10, P9, P10 TO: RE-35 ( 10.25 a.c.)
Q54-30, Q54-31, Q54-32, Q54-33
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 DCOD A, RE-35 DCOD A 145, 11 N/A, 13
S-1, RE-35 145, 11 N/A, 13
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-75-18_Staff_Rec.mxd
Page 699
C-1
OF TOWN O F
R1-10 PCD *
CAV E
PCD *
CREE K
7 TH AVE
CARE FREE
CAREFREE HWY Z-131-95
Z-131-95
STA TE R O U TE 7 4 (C A RE FR EE H IG H WAY )
S-1*
C-2 * AN X 33 4
Z- 1 25 -0 1
* Z- 3 5- 05
M ARI CO PA C-2
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
RE-35 *
AN X 18 1
CITY O F
AN X 33 4
R1-1 8
4 0 TH ST
Z- 3 5- 05
PRD *
Z- 3 1- 01 AN X 24 4
CO UN T Y Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
CP/GC P *
MARICOPA COUNTY
AN X 18 1
R1-18 PCD *
CP / G C P
*
Z- 9 0- 01
S-1
R1-1 8
PRD *
SCO TTSDA LE
5 2 ND ST
5 6 TH ST
S-1
Z-131-95
Z- 5 5- 95
MARICOPA
55TH ST
COUN TY S-1
R1-1 8 PRD * AN X 49 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
C-1
*
S-1 MARICO PA
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 PRD *
R-2 *
R-2 *
Z- 5 5- 95
P ho en i x C it y L im it s P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 3 9- 04
Z- 3 8- 04
S-1 * RA
S-1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 3 8- 03
AN X 29 1
NC
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 * * COUNTY
R1-1 8 PRD
Z-112-08
Z- 4 -9 3
HO
R1-1 8 PRD*
R1 -1 8 PR D *
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 4 6- 98
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1 *
S-1
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- S P - 21 -9 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP * R1-1 8 PRD *
PAL
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- 5 5- 95 P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1 *
S-1
O
S-1
AN X 39 5
Z- 8 8- 07
R-3 *
MA
Z-3 3- 12
RE-35 *
Z- 9 8- 92
R1-1 8 PRD *
DO DR
Z- 5 5- 95 S-1 S-1 S-1
Z- 1 73 -0 1 Z- 3 8- 03
S-1 AN X 26 2
AN X 29 1
Z- 4 5- 03
AN X 29 8
D RE-35
VE S-1 R1-18 *
S-1 R1-1 8 PRD * R1-1 8
KR
Z- 1 20 -9 6
PRD *
Z- 7 -9 4
53RD ST
R1-1 8 PRD
VA Z-110-05 Z-145-06
Z-6 8-04
LL S-1 *
PH O - 1 - 17 - - Z - 77 - 16
EE
S-2*
Z- 5 1- 06
EY
S-1 Z- 3 7- 03
S-2 *
ANX 358
AN X 29 0
ANX 445 Z-7 1-06
Z- 7 7- 16
S-1
AN X 34 0
Z- 7 6- 06
R1-18 PRD *
RE-35
Z- 9 3- 94
R1-1 8 *
RD
S-1
CR
Z- 7 -9 4
Z- 6 5- 03
Sub-District A
AN X 29 9
S-1
Z- 4 2- 99
AN X 20 5
Z-58-01 R1-1 0*
Z- 6 7- 15
R1-1 8*
S-1 * S-1
R1 -18 *
Z- 5 7- 15
Z- 2 -1 8 Z- 4 2- 00
C-2 SP
Z- 9 3- 97
AN X 22 8
CA
AN X 27 8
Z- 1 65 -0 2
C-2 SP *
C-2 SP AN X 26 4
RE-35
AN X 27 7 Z- 1 0- 02
RE-35 *
Z- 1 64 -0 2
R1-1 8*
C-2 *
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
C-1 * RE-35
AN X 26 4
Z- 1 04 -0 3
Z- 4 7- 16
Z- 1 0- 02 AN X 40 0 S- 1
PUD
VE
AN X 30 4 Z- 1 32 - 7
C-2 * Z- 9 3- 97
Z- 2 8- 14 AN X 6 4 C-2
Z- 1 61 -9 9
Z- 1 0- 02 C-2 AN X 21 6
AN X 21 8 Z- 1 77 -9 9
Z- 3 2- 00
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-1 8 PRD *
PCD * *
C-2 * Z-5 0-13
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
PC D
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
56TH ST
FH *
Z- 2 9- 02
RE -3 5 *
DE
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
RE-35
R1-6 * R1 -6 *
PCD
PC D
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 C-1 PCD *
Z- 2 37 -G -8 5 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 1 3- 01
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
R1-10 R
SE
RE-35 *
Z- 1 14 -9 5
AN X 17 9
Z-34-13
R-2 *
PC D
MARICO PA
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-8 *
R-2 *
PCD
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 PCD
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5 T RE- 35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
W
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37-A- 85
R-2 PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
RE -35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
IL R1-10
R1-1 8 *
Z- 4 1- 05
LO
C-O /G-O
PCD PCD *
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
Z- 2 37 -H - 8 5 Z-2 37-B- 85
R1 -1 0 *
C-2 * PC D
Z-2 37-A- 85 Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
DIXILETA DR
R1-10
C-2 PCD
DNS /W VR *
Z-2 37-G -85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85 C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
C-2 *
C- 2
PCD*
Z-4 3- 98
PCD *
Z-2 37-D- 85
W
PK
Z-1 20-9 4
C-2
PCD
SP * PU D
Z- 43- 98
Z- 43- A - 98 R-3A Z-3 6 -1 2
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85 R1 -8
PC D *
COUNTY
S-1
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
C-2
PCD *
PCD *
Z-2 37-8 5
C- 2
PC D
SP *
Z-2 37-J- 85 C-2
PCD *
C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37 -G -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
RE-3 5
R1 -6
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
W
R1 -8 *
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-5 6-97
CP / GCP
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-3 3-99
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-B- 85
R1-6
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-C- 85
Z-2 37-E- 85
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -C - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
Y R1 - 8 *
Z-SP-14 -89 R1 -10 *
44TH ST
Z- 1 05 -0 1
Z-6 5 -19
RE -35
42ND ST
CP / BP *
Z-1 08-0 7
S- 1*
AN X 44 4
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
R1-10 *
MARICOPA
R1-6 *
AN X 25 8
Z-1 2 2 -1 4
R1-6 *
Z- 6 -0 2
Z- 4 1- 96
Z-6 4-13 S-1
AN X 4 8 2
RE -35
R1 -6
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
COUNTY
R1-10* Z-2 37 -C -8 5
RE-43
Z-2 37 -E -8 5
Z-6 9 -1 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
PCD
*
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Phoenix City Limits
AN X 21 2
RH PCD
Z- 1 13 -9 9
R1-6 PCD *
P ho en i x C it y L im it s S-1
S-1 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 24 3
Z- 2 0- 01 R1-6
40TH ST
S-1 PCD * R1 -8 *
S-1 SP * Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 22 1 PRD
Z-109-97
AN X 22 1
S-2
Z- 2 9- 00
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 1 50 -0 1
Z- S P - 22 -0 3
AN X 35 1
S-1
PCD *
Z- 1 76 -0 5
7 TH AVE
R1-8 * C-2 * C-1 * S-1
Sub-District B
AN X 22 1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 1 16 -0 7 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
DYNAMITE BLVD
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 7 1- 03 AN X 17 3
R1-1 8 * S-1*
S-1
S-1 Z-5 6- 95 R1 -10 *
AN X 41 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 7 3- 16
AN X 50 8 Z- 4 5- 13
AN X 25 7
Z- 5 -0 2
Ph oe ni x C i ty L i m it s
DY NA M ITE B L VD
C-1 *
R1-18 *
Z-1 25 -9 9
PUD *
Z-2 2- 18
Z-61-06
R1-1 8 *
Z-7 3 -9 7
RE-35
CITY O F
MARICOPA
Pho enix City L imits
TATUM BLVD
Z-58-01 COUNTY
S-1 SO RE-35
N OR R1 -1 0 *
AN
Z- 1 18 -9 4
R1 -1 0 *
Z- 9 7- 94
Z- 1 18 -9 4
S-1*
SCO TTSDA LE
Z-2 6-09
D ES
Phoenix Ctiy Limits
ER
TD
R1-6 *
R1-1 0 * R1-6 * PCD Pho enix City L imits
S-1
PCD Z- 1 46 -9 7
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
RE-35
R
ANX 149 R1-8 *
JOMAX RD
R1 -8 * PCD
PC D
RE-35 *
Z- 9 9- 88
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 9 9- 88
R-2
PCD
*
PCD
* C-2 P CD *
S-1 *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88 Z- 9 9- 88
AN X 50 5
R-2 *
R1-10 *
Z- 9 9- 88
RE - 43
R1-6 *
RE - 43
PCD
S-1
PCD Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 1 46 -9 7
R-2 *
MARICOP A R1-6
PCD
*
PCD S-1
COUNTY R1-6
S-1
R1-6 * Z-61-06 R1-18 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
* Z- 9 9- C - 88
PCD
R1-8 *
PC D * Z- 9 9- 88
R1-6 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- A - 88
R1-8
Z- 9 9- 88
*
PCD PCD *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88 *
YEARLING RD Z-61-06
PC D
Z-61-06 Z-61-06
I
CAREFREE HWY
Z-75-18 DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
Miles
DYNAMITE BLVD
1 0.5 0 1 JOMAX RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD
PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
BLACK MTN PKY
SR-101
MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
FROM:
S-1 DCOD Sub-District A ( 144.81 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
9/29/2021 RE-35 DCOD Sub-District A ( 10.25 a.c.)
Z-75-18 (Per Staff Recommendation) 2/25/2022
REVISION DATES:
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO. S-1 ( 144.81 a.c.)
155.06 Acres Q51-35, Q51-36, Q52-32, Q52-33, R9, R10, Q9,
Q52-34, Q52-36, Q52-37, Q53-30,
Q53-31, Q53-32, Q53-33, Q53-34,
Q10, P9, P10 TO: RE-35 ( 10.25 a.c.)
Q54-30, Q54-31, Q54-32, Q54-33
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 DCOD A, RE-35 DCOD A 145, 11 N/A, 13
S-1, RE-35 145, 11 N/A, 13
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-75-18_Staff_Rec.mxd
Page 700
Attachment H
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
May 5, 2022
ITEM NO: 6
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:
Application #: Z-75-18-2 (Companion Cases GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, Z-TA-5-18-2, and Z-62-
18-2)
Location: South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and 32nd Street
alignments
From: RE-35 DCOD A and S-1 DCOD A
To: RE-35 and S-1
Acreage: Approximately 155.06
Proposal: Modify the boundary of the Desert Character Overlay District to remove a
portion from Sub-District A.
Applicant: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Owner: MacEwan Ranch, LLC
Representative: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Denial as filed; approval of the staff recommended area in Z-TA-5-18-2.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Desert View 11/6/2018 Information only.
North Gateway 11/8/2018 Information only.
Desert View 4/2/2019 Information only.
Desert View 12/7/2021 Information only.
North Gateway 12/9/2021 Information only.
North Gateway 3/10/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 4-1.
Desert View 4/5/2022 Denial as filed, approval per the staff recommendation. Vote: 7-4.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Addendum A Staff Report.
Motion Discussion: N/A
Motion details: Commissioner Simon made a MOTION to approve Z-75-18-2, per the
Addendum A Staff Report.
Maker: Simon
Second: Johnson
Vote: 7-1 (Perez)
Absent: Gaynor
Opposition Present: Yes
Findings:
1. The rezoning request is a companion case to Z-TA-5-18-2 and would update the
Zoning Map boundaries for the changes proposed.
2. The proposal is consistent with changes in the transportation corridor alignment since
originally adopted.
Page 701
3. The proposal maintains overlay district standards for the property north of Sonoran
Desert Drive, adjacent to the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve, and allows for integration of
appropriate design standards from the overlay in the Verdin Planned Unit
Development (Companion Rezoning Case No. Z-62-18-2).
Stipulations:
None.
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.
Page 702
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
and Broadway Road (Ordinance G-6994)
Request to hold a public hearing and amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section
601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-77-21-
7 and rezone the site from PUD (Planned Unit Development) to R1-10 (Single-Family
Residence District) to allow single-family residential.
Summary
Current Zoning: PUD
Proposed Zoning: R1-10
Acreage: 36.69 acres
Proposal: Single-family residential
Owner: DNZ Holdings, LLC
Applicant: Lennar
Representative: William E. Lally, Tiffany & Bosco, P.A.
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Estrella Village Planning Committee heard this case on April 19,
2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 6-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on May 5, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Estrella Village Planning Committee recommendation,
by a vote of 8-0.
The applicant appealed the Planning Commission recommendation in order to
consider the stipulations recommended as part of Addendum A of the Staff Report.
Location
Southeast corner of 75th Avenue and Broadway Road
Council District: 7
Parcel Address: 7443 W. Broadway Road.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 703
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-77-21-7) FROM PUD (PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT) TO R1-10 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE
DISTRICT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 39.69-acre site located at the southeast
corner of 75th Avenue and Broadway Road in a portion of Section 25, Township 1
North, Range 1 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed
from “PUD” (Planned Unit Development), to “R1-10” (Single-Family Residence District).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B.”
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,
Page 704
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. Lots with a rear lot line along the eastern perimeter of the site shall be a
minimum of 140 feet in depth.
2. A minimum 15-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along the eastern
perimeter property line(s), as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
3. A minimum 30-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along the
western perimeter property line(s) along the 75th Avenue alignment, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
4. A minimum 10-foot-wide, average 15-foot, landscape setback shall be provided
along the south perimeter property line(s) abutting the State Route (SR) 30
freeway, planted with large evergreen trees to provide a minimum 30-foot
vertical screen at maturity, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
5. The required landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 75 percent 2-
inch caliper and 25 percent 3-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant trees,
20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, and five 5-gallon shrubs per tree,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department. Except that
landscaping along arterial streets shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial
Street Landscaping Program landscape palette and landscaping standards in
the Estrella Village, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the
Planning and Development Department on alternative design solutions
consistent with a pedestrian environment.
6. Residential lots shall be a minimum 150 feet from the south perimeter property
line abutting the State Route (SR) 30 freeway alignment, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
7. A perimeter wall no less than 6 feet in height shall be provided along the south
perimeter of the site adjacent to the State Route (SR) 30 freeway alignment.
This wall shall include material and textural differences, such as stucco and/or
split face block with a decorative element, such as tile or stamped designs, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
8. An open space area shall be provided directly across the vehicular entrance
from Broadway Road into the development, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 705
9. All sidewalks within the development shall be detached with a minimum five-
foot-wide landscaped strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb and
shall include minimum 2-inch caliper single trunk shade trees planted at a rate
of one tree per lot or a minimum of 20 feet on center or equivalent groupings
where adjacent to open space areas, as modified and approved by the
Planning and Development Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the
developer shall work with the Planning and Development Department on
alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian environment.
10. The sidewalk along Broadway Road shall be a minimum of five feet in width
and detached from the curb, consistent with the City of Phoenix Street
Classification Map and planted to the following standards, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
a. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at
maturity.
b. The landscape palette and planting standards, unless otherwise provided
herein, shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping
Program requirements for arterial streets.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
11. The developer shall dedicate a multi-use trail easement (MUTE) along the east
side of the 75th Avenue alignment in accordance with the MAG supplemental
detail, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. The
developer shall work with the Site Planning section on an alternate design for
this requirement through the technical appeal process.
12. The developer shall construct one bus stop pad on this site on eastbound
Broadway Road. The bus stop pad shall be constructed according to City of
Phoenix Standard Detail P1260 with a minimum depth of 10 feet and shall be
spaced from the intersection of 75th Avenue according to City of Phoenix
Standard Detail P1258.
13. The developer shall dedicate minimum 55 feet of right-of-way and construct the
south side of Broadway Road, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
14. The developer shall construct a minimum 14-foot-wide landscaped median
along Broadway Road, as approved by the Street Transportation Department.
15. Access control to Broadway Road shall meet current Street Transportation
Page 706
Planning and Design Guidelines.
16. The developer shall dedicate a tract for the east side of 75th Avenue of
sufficient width necessary to accommodate a City “D” Section Arterial Roadway
for the purposes of conditional right-of-way for the future 75th Avenue
alignment, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
17. Access to existing MCDOT roadways shall require approval from Maricopa
County.
18. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) to the City and
MCDOT for this development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted
until the study is reviewed and approved by the City and MCDOT. The TIS shall
include signal warrant analysis for the intersection of 75th Avenue and
Broadway. Prior to final site plan approval, the applicant will contribute 25-
percent to the traffic signal at 75th Avenue and Broadway Road to the
appropriate jurisdiction.
19. The developer shall underground all existing electrical utilities within the City
public right-of-way that are impacted or must be relocated as part of the project.
20. Existing irrigation facilities along Broadway Road are to be undergrounded and
relocated outside of City right-of-way. Contact SRP to identify existing land
rights and establish appropriate process to relocate facility. Relocations that
require additional dedications or land transfer require completion prior to
obtaining plat and/or civil plan review approval.
21. The developer shall construct all City streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. Adjacent street improvements
shall apply to Broadway Road only. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
22. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development the existence and
operational characteristics of existing mining operations in the area. The form
and content of such documents shall be reviewed by the City prior to
recordation.
23. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development the existence and
operational characteristics of agricultural uses. These documents must advise
purchasers that, under Section 3-112(E), Arizona Revised Statutes, the City of
Phoenix may not declare an agricultural operation conducted on farmland to be
a nuisance if the agricultural use is lawful, customary, reasonable, safe and
Page 707
necessary to the agriculture industry. The form and content of such documents
shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to recordation.
24. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development the preferred
alignment and operational characteristics of the State Route 30 or SR-30
freeway. The form and content of such documents shall be reviewed by the City
prior to recordation.
25. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
26. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase
I data testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified archeologist,
determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall
conduct Phase II archeological data recovery excavations.
27. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.
28. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 Waiver of Claims forms. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder’s Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of June, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
Page 708
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (2 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 709
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-77-21-7
PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 1
NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25, BEING
MARKED BY A BRASS CAP IN A HANDHOLE, FROM WHICH THE WEST QUARTER
CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25, BEING MARKED BY HALF INCH REBAR BEARS
SOUTH 02 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, 3022.99 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 52.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST, ALONG SAID
NORTH LINE, 1270.39 FEET;
THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTH LINE, SOUTH 00 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 17
SECONDS WEST, 1710.19 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE "NEW STATE
CANAL", AS SHOWN IN BK. 124, PG. 22, MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDS, (M.C.R.);
THENCE NORTH 48 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID
NORTH LINE, 79.21 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, NORTH 58 DEGREES 23
MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST, 554.08 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, NORTH 61 DEGREES 58
MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST, 145.06 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, NORTH 69 DEGREES 12
MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST, 196.95 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, NORTH 78 DEGREES 20
MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST, 205.96 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, SOUTH 87 DEGREES 30
MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST, 213.66 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
OF 75TH AVENUE, AS SHOWN IN DOCUMENT 2005-0246047, M.C.R.;
THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTH LINE, NORTH 01 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 02
SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 957.67 FEET;
Page 710
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 09
DEGREES 44 MINUTES 58 SECONDS EAST, 71.59 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 02
DEGREES 09 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST, 117.04 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 89
DEGREES 58 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST, 12.00 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 02
DEGREES 09 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST, 12.01 FEET;
THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST RIGHT-OF WAY LINE, NORTH 02 DEGREES 09
MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST, 40.03 FEET TO SAID POINT OF BEGINNING;
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 1,735,219 SQUARE FEET OR 39.8351 ACRES, MORE OR
LESS.
Page 711
Page 712
Attachment B
Staff Report Z-77-21-7
April 14, 2022
Estrella Village Planning Committee April 19, 2022
Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 5, 2022
Request From: PUD (Planned Unit Development District)
(36.69 acres)
Request To: R1-10 (Single-Family Residence District)
(36.69 acres)
Proposed Use: Single-family residential
Location: Southeast corner of 75th Avenue and
Broadway Road
Owner: DNZ Holdings, LLC
Applicant: Lennar
Representative: William Lally, Tiffany & Bosco, PA
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations
General Plan Conformity
Mixed Use (Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling
General Plan Land Use Map Designation
units per acre / Mixed Use Agricultural)
75th Avenue
Arterial Street Roadway width varies
(Maricopa County)
Street Map Classification 73rd Avenue Local Street 0-foot west half street
(Maricopa County)
Broadway Road Arterial Street 40-foot south half street
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES & NEIGHBORHOODS CORE VALUE;
CERTAINTY & CHARACTER; DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Promote neighborhood identity
through planning that reinforces the existing landscaping and character of the area.
Each new development should contribute to the character identified for the village.
As stipulated, the development will promote neighborhood identity by requiring that
Page 713
Staff Report: Z-77-21-7
April 14, 2022
landscaping along arterial streets conforms with the Estrella Village Arterial Street
Landscaping Program landscape palette and landscaping standards for arterial streets in
the Estrella Village. This will promote the character of the area and vision for the Estrella
Village.
CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE
PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity, respectful of local
conditions and surrounding neighborhoods.
The proposal for a single-family detached residential community would allow development
of a housing product that is consistent with other single-family uses in the area. As
stipulated, the development will incorporate deeper perimeter lots along the eastern
property line and enhanced landscaping, which will also help to provide a transition from
the proposed development to adjacent larger-lot residential properties and to respect local
conditions.
BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES AND SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new development
and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.
The proposal will be required to provide shade along the internal streets and along
Broadway Road where permitted. This will help to encourage walking and to mitigate the
urban heat island effect by covering hard surfaces, thus cooling the micro-climate around
the project vicinity.
Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives
Estrella Village Plan: See Background Item No. 4.
Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping Program: See Background Item No. 6.
Tree and Shade Master Plan: See Background Item No. 8.
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Staff Report: Z-77-21-7
April 14, 2022
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Land Use Zoning
On Site Dairy farm PUD
North (across Broadway
Single-family residential R1-10
Road)
South Agricultural RU-43 (Maricopa County)
East (including across Agricultural and large-lot
RU-43 (Maricopa County)
73rd Avenue) residential
West (across the 75th
Mining operation RU-43 (Maricopa County)
Avenue alignment)
R1-10 – Single-Family Residential District
(Planned Residential Development Option)
Provisions on the
Standards R1-10 Requirements
proposed site plan
Gross Acreage - 39.69 acres
Total Maximum Number of 139, up to 178 with bonus 159 units (Met)
Units
Maximum Density 3.5 dwelling units per acre, up 4.01 dwelling units per acre
to 4.5 with bonus (Met)
Minimum Lot Width 45 feet 45 feet (Met)
Minimum Lot Depth 110 feet adjacent to arterial 120 feet (Met)
street
Maximum Building Height 2 stories and 30 feet Not specified*
Maximum Lot Coverage 40 percent, up to 50 percent Not specified*
including attached shade
structures
MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS
Perimeter Streets: 15 feet Not specified*
(73rd Avenue, 75th Avenue
and Broadway Road)
Page 715
Staff Report: Z-77-21-7
April 14, 2022
Interior Perimeter Property Rear: 15 feet (1-story), Not specified*
Lines: 20 feet (2-story)
(Side and Rear)
Side: 10 feet (1-story), 15 feet
(2-story)
MINIMUM LANDSCAPE SETBACKS AND STANDARDS
Adjacent to street (73rd 15 feet average, 10 feet 73th Avenue: 15 feet (Met)
Avenue, 75th Avenue and minimum
Broadway Road) 75th Avenue: 15 feet (Met)
Broadway Road:
15 feet (Met)
Minimum Common Area 5% of gross site area 17% (Met)
*Variance or site plan revision required.
Background/Issues/Analysis
SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone 39.69 acres located at the southeast corner of 75th
Avenue and Broadway Road from PUD (Planned Unit Development District) to R1-
10 (Single-Family Residence District) for single-family residential uses. The site is
presently used as a dairy and bottling facility.
In 2013, the site was rezoned from S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence District) to PUD
for a dairy and bottling facility, in addition to allowing future single-family residential
uses. The residential density approved at that time was of 2.98 dwelling units per
acre and included a mix of 60-foot-wide and 70-foot-wide lots.
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
2. The surrounding area contains a variety of agricultural and residential zoning
districts including S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence District), R1-10 (Single-Family
Residence District), and R1-8 (Single-Family Residence District). Properties to the
south, east, and west of the site are zoned RU-43 (Rural 43) and located within
unincorporated Maricopa County. Properties to the east of this site are primarily
large-lot residential uses, while the property to the south is primarily used for
agricultural purposes.
Page 716
Staff Report: Z-77-21-7
April 14, 2022
The property west of the site,
across the 75th Avenue
alignment has an active
mining operation. Properties
north of the site, across
Broadway Road, are zoned
R1-10 and are single-family
residential.
Zoning Aerial Map, Source: Planning and Development
Department
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATIONS
3. The General Plan Land Use
Map designation for the
subject site is a mix of
Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling
units per acre and Mixed Use
Agricultural. The proposed
R1-10 zoning district is
consistent with the
Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling
unit per acre designation on
the site. North of the site,
across Broadway Road, is
designated as Residential 2
to 3.5 dwelling units per acre.
South, east and west of the General Plan Land Use Map, Source: Planning and
Development Department
site is designated as
Residential 1 to 2 dwelling
units per acre.
4. Estrella Village Plan
The Estrella Village Plan adopted in 1999, outlines a vision for developing the
Estrella Village through five main goals that include:
Page 717
Staff Report: Z-77-21-7
April 14, 2022
1. Orderly growth;
2. Identifiable village core;
3. Strong residential neighborhoods;
4. Variety of homes and jobs; and
5. Consistent streetscapes and trail linkages.
The proposed development will further these goals by developing a residential
community in an appropriate location bounded by an arterial street and within close
proximity to the future SR-30 freeway. These will allow for transportation options for
future residents. In addition, this residential community is consistent with other
development patterns in the area and will promote the orderly growth of the Village.
Lastly, landscaping along Broadway Road will adhere to the Estrella Village
Landscaping Program which intends to promote a consistent streetscape throughout
the Estrella Village.
Estrella Village Plan Land Use Map, Source: City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department
Page 718
Staff Report: Z-77-21-7
April 14, 2022
PROPOSAL
5. The proposal is to develop a
159-lot, single-family
detached residential
subdivision with primary
street access along Broadway
Road and secondary access
proposed along 73rd Avenue.
A density of 4.01 dwelling
units per acre on depicted in
the proposed site plan, which
also depicts lots at 45 feet in
width.
Staff does not recommend
general conformance to the
site plan provided by the
applicant as density bonus
points are being sought by
the applicant following the
rezoning process to achieve
the requested density. Conceptual Site Plan, Source: RVi
In order to buffer the site from
agricultural uses to the east,
staff recommends Stipulation
Nos. 1 and 2 to require
deeper lots and a wider
landscape setback than
required by the Zoning
Ordinance along the eastern
property line. To mitigate
impacts from the adjacent
mining operation west of the
75th Avenue alignment, staff
recommends Stipulation No.
3 to require a larger
landscape setback. Lastly,
staff recommends Stipulation
No. 5 to require 2-inch and 3-
inch caliper trees to screen
the site from adjacent uses. Open Space/Density Bonus Point Exhibit, Source: RVi
Page 719
Staff Report: Z-77-21-7
April 14, 2022
Staff also recommends Stipulation No. 8 to require that an open space tract be
located directly across the main drive to the development along Broadway Road.
This will provide visual interest for incoming residents and pedestrians walking along
Broadway Road.
The conceptual building elevations submitted by the applicant depict various
architectural styles, colors and textures. Staff is not recommending a stipulation to
require general conformance to the building elevations, as the Single-Family Design
Review guidelines found in Section 507.Tab.A.II of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance
will help to address design considerations based on unique site conditions.
Conceptual Building Elevations, Source: Lennar
6. Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping Program
The Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping Program adopted in 1999, provides
a landscape palette for arterial streets within the Estrella Village to help establish the
community’s character. In addition to providing planting guidelines, the plan also
indicates the locations to establish entry gateways that welcome individuals entering
the village with an entry sign and an enhanced landscape area of 75 feet by 75 feet
in size.
Stipulation Nos. 5 and 10 require that landscaping along Broadway Road, an arterial
street, adhere to the Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping Program to
promote the vision of the Village and provide consistent streetscapes.
7. State Route 30 (SR-30) Freeway Alignment
As of the writing of this staff report, the Arizona Department of Transportation
(ADOT) had selected a preferred SR-30 freeway alignment that crosses this
proposed development along the southern portion of the site. The proposed
Page 720
Staff Report: Z-77-21-7
April 14, 2022
development will provide increased housing opportunities in this area, while the SR-
30 freeway will serve as a major transportation route in this part of the region,
connecting the residents of this development to employment and services in the
region.
To mitigate impacts on future homes from the future SR-30 freeway, staff
recommends several stipulations. Stipulation No. 4 requires that a landscape
setback be provided along the south property line where the SR-30 freeway will be
located. Stipulation No. 6 requires a large separation between lots and the SR-30
freeway to prevent or minimize visual plus noise impacts. Stipulation No. 7 requires
that a minimum 6-foot-tall solid wall be provided along the south perimeter of the site
adjacent to the SR-30 freeway alignment behind the landscape setback to screen
the freeway as much as possible and also provide visual interest by including
material and textural differences.
8. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan encourages treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure the trees are an integral part of the City’s planning and
development process. Sidewalks on the street frontages should be detached from
the curbs to allow trees to be planted on both sides of the sidewalk to provide
thermal comfort for pedestrians and to reduce the urban heat island effect. Staff is
recommending several stipulations designed to provide trees and enhance shade
within the development.
Staff is recommending stipulations for enhanced landscaping and shaded
sidewalks:
Seventy-five percent two-inch caliper and 25 percent three-inch caliper trees
within the required landscape setbacks (Stipulation No. 5);
Detached sidewalks along internal streets with a minimum of one tree per lot
and additional trees placed 20 feet on center (Stipulation No. 9);
Staff also recommends that the sidewalk along Broadway Road is detached per
Stipulation No. 10. Due to existing overhead power lines, the applicant shall work
with the utility company to determine if trees are allowed to be located within the
landscape strip between the sidewalk and back of curb.
9. Complete Streets Guidelines
In 2014, the City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding
Principles. The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an
accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such as
Page 721
Staff Report: Z-77-21-7
April 14, 2022
bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. This development will help to
pedestrianize the immediate street frontages by providing detached sidewalks along
Broadway Road and within internal streets. Recreation will be furthered by providing
a multi-use trail easement along the western perimeter of the site to be improved by
the City in the future. This trail will help to establish a new trail alignment that could
connect the trail on the northside of Broadway Road to trails or pathways along Salt
River via an underpass along 75th Avenue. These are addressed in Stipulation Nos.
9, 10, and 11.
10. Zero Waste PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal to
become a zero-waste city, as part of the city’s overall 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and
expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs. Section 716 of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance establishes standards to encourage the provision of
recycling containers for multifamily, commercial and mixed-use developments
meeting certain criteria. The City of Phoenix offers recycling services to residential
properties.
11. Housing Phoenix
In June 2020, the Phoenix City Council approved the Housing Phoenix Plan. This
Plan contains policy initiatives for the development and preservation of housing with
a vision of creating a stronger and more vibrant Phoenix through increased housing
options for residents at all income levels and family sizes. Phoenix’s rapid
population growth and housing underproduction has led to a need for over 163,000
new housing units. Current shortages of housing supply relative to demand are a
primary reason why housing costs are increasing. The proposed development
supports the Plan’s goal of preserving or creating 50,000 housing units by 2030 by
contributing to a variety housing types that will address the supply shortage at a
more rapid pace while using vacant land in a more sustainable fashion.
If this development is approved, it would allow a new housing development within
the area and new housing choice for existing and new residents to the area.
COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
12. As of the writing of this report, staff did not receive any correspondence from the
public on this rezoning case.
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
13. The Parks and Recreation Department did not provide any comments on this
project. However, this department supports the new proposed multi-use trail
Page 722
Staff Report: Z-77-21-7
April 14, 2022
alignment along the east side of the 75th Avenue alignment from Broadway Road to
the Rio Salado as it will create an alternative pedestrian way under the State Route
30 freeway which bisects other north-south trail alignments in this area. This is
addressed in Stipulation No. 11.
14. The Public Transit Department requires the construction of a bus stop pad along
eastbound Broadway Road. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 12.
15. The Street Transportation Department provided comments pertaining to detached
sidewalks along Broadway Road. Other comments pertained to right-of-way
dedications and/or construction, roadway access restrictions, traffic impact
statement, overhead utility undergrounding and other general street improvement
requirements. These comments are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 10, and 13
through 21.
16. The Fire Department indicated that the development shall comply with the latest
Phoenix Fire Code edition. Further, the Department commented that they do not
know the water supply at this site and other general comments about fire hydrants,
fire lanes and gates were provided.
17. The Water Services Departments commented that there are water and sewer mains
that can potentially serve the development. However, capacity is a dynamic
condition that can change over time due to a variety of factors. Furthermore, the City
intends to provide water and sewer service, requirements and assurances for which
are determined during the site plan review process. For any given property, water
and sewer requirements may vary over time to be less or more restrictive depending
on the status of the City’s water and sewer infrastructure. Lastly, this development is
within a sewer repayment area under Sewer Agreement No. 120849.
18. The Floodplain Management division of the Public Works Department did not have
any comments on this case.
OTHER
19. The subject site is within close proximity to properties used for agricultural and
mining uses, plus the State Route (SR) 30 freeway, thus potentially leading to dust,
odors or other impacts to future residential uses on the site. Stipulation Nos. 22
through 24 would require disclosure to purchasers of property within the
development regarding the existence and operational characteristics of these uses.
20. The site is located in a larger area identified as being archaeologically sensitive. If
further review by the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office determines the site and
immediate area to be archaeologically sensitive, and if no previous archaeological
Page 723
Staff Report: Z-77-21-7
April 14, 2022
projects have been conducted within this project area, it is recommended that
archaeological Phase I data testing of this area be conducted. Phase II
archaeological data recovery excavations may be necessary based upon the results
of the testing. A qualified archaeologist must make this determination in consultation
with the City of Phoenix Archaeologist. In the event archaeological materials are
encountered during construction, all ground disturbing activities must cease within a
33-foot radius of the discovery and the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office must be
notified immediately and allowed time to properly assess the materials. This is
addressed in Stipulation Nos. 25 through 27.
21. Staff has not received a completed form for the Waiver of Claims for Diminution in
Value of Property under Proposition 207 (A.R.S. 12-1131 et seq.), as required by
the rezoning application process. Therefore, a stipulation has been added to require
the form be completed and submitted prior to preliminary site plan approval. This is
addressed in Stipulation No. 28.
22. The developer shall provide a hydraulic/hydrologic analysis of offsite storm water
flows, when present, at the time of preliminary site plan submittal for verification of
required infrastructure regarding lot space and density.
23. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and ordinances.
Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements such as obtaining a
use permit to conduct the proposed outdoor use in this zoning district. Other formal
actions such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and abandonments, may be
required.
Findings
1. This proposed development provides a housing option that is consistent with
development patterns in the general area.
2. As stipulated, the proposed development will promote the vision of various policy
plans including the Tree and Shade Master Plan, Estrella Village Area Plan and
Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping Program.
3. As stipulated, this development will serve as a gateway to the Rio Salado by
providing the first section of a new multi-use trail alignment via a trail easement that
may ultimately allow pedestrians along Broadway Road to connect to the Rio Salado.
Page 724
Staff Report: Z-77-21-7
April 14, 2022
Stipulations
1. Lots within 30 feet of the eastern perimeter property line shall be a minimum of 140
feet in depth.
2. A minimum 15-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along the eastern
perimeter property line (s), as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
3. A minimum 30-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along the western
perimeter property line(s) along the 75th Avenue alignment, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
4. A minimum 10-foot-wide, average 15-foot, landscape setback shall be provided
along the south perimeter property line(s) abutting the State Route (SR) 30 freeway,
planted with large evergreen trees to provide a minimum 30-foot vertical screen at
maturity, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
5. The required landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 75 percent 2-inch
caliper and 25 percent 3-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on
center or in equivalent groupings, and five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department. Except that landscaping along arterial
streets shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping Program
landscape palette and landscaping standards in the Estrella Village, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the
developer shall work with the Planning and Development Department on alternative
design solutions consistent with a pedestrian environment.
6. Residential lots shall be a minimum 150 feet from the south perimeter property line
abutting the State Route (SR) 30 freeway alignment, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.
7. A perimeter wall no less than 6 feet in height shall be provided along the south
perimeter of the site adjacent to the State Route (SR) 30 freeway alignment. This
wall shall include material and textural differences, such as stucco and/or split face
block with a decorative element, such as tile or stamped designs, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.
8. An open space area shall be provided directly across the vehicular entrance from
Broadway Road into the development, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 725
Staff Report: Z-77-21-7
April 14, 2022
9. All sidewalks within the development shall be detached with a minimum five-foot-
wide landscaped strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb and shall
include minimum 2-inch caliper single trunk shade trees planted at a rate of one tree
per lot or a minimum of 20 feet on center or equivalent groupings where adjacent to
open space areas, as modified and approved by the Planning and Development
Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning
and Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
10. The sidewalk along Broadway Road shall be a minimum of five feet in width and
detached from the curb, consistent with the City of Phoenix Street Classification
Map and planted to the following standards, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
a. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at maturity.
b. The landscape palette and planting standards, unless otherwise provided
herein, shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping
Program requirements for arterial streets.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
11. The developer shall dedicate a multi-use trail easement (MUTE) along the east side
of the 75th Avenue alignment in accordance with the MAG supplemental detail, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. The developer shall work
with the Site Planning section on an alternate design for this requirement through
the technical appeal process.
12. The developer shall construct one bus stop pad on this site on eastbound Broadway
Road. The bus stop pad shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard
Detail P1260 with a minimum depth of 10 feet and shall be spaced from the
intersection of 75th Avenue according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258.
13. The developer shall dedicate minimum 55 feet of right-of-way and construct the
south side of Broadway Road, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
14. The developer shall construct a minimum 14-foot-wide landscaped median along
Broadway Road, as approved by the Street Transportation Department.
Page 726
Staff Report: Z-77-21-7
April 14, 2022
15. Access control to Broadway Road shall meet current Street Transportation Planning
and Design Guidelines.
16. The developer shall dedicate a tract for the east side of 75th Avenue of sufficient
width necessary to accommodate a City “D” Section Arterial Roadway for the
purposes of conditional right-of-way for the future 75th Avenue alignment, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
17. Access to existing MCDOT roadways shall require approval from Maricopa County.
18. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) to the City and MCDOT
for this development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the
study is reviewed and approved by the City and MCDOT. The TIS shall include
signal warrant analysis for the intersection of 75th Avenue and Broadway. Prior to
final site plan approval, the applicant will contribute 25-percent to the traffic signal at
75th Avenue and Broadway Road to the appropriate jurisdiction.
19. The developer shall underground all existing electrical utilities within the City public
right-of-way that are impacted or must be relocated as part of the project.
20. Existing irrigation facilities along Broadway Road are to be undergrounded and
relocated outside of City right-of-way. Contact SRP to identify existing land rights
and establish appropriate process to relocate facility. Relocations that require
additional dedications or land transfer require completion prior to obtaining plat
and/or civil plan review approval.
21. The developer shall construct all City streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. Adjacent street improvements shall apply to Broadway
Road only. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.
22. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development the existence and
operational characteristics of existing mining operations in the area. The form and
content of such documents shall be reviewed by the City prior to recordation.
Page 727
Staff Report: Z-77-21-7
April 14, 2022
23. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development the existence and
operational characteristics of agricultural uses. These documents must advise
purchasers that, under Section 3-112(E), Arizona Revised Statutes, the City of
Phoenix may not declare an agricultural operation conducted on farmland to be a
nuisance if the agricultural use is lawful, customary, reasonable, safe and necessary
to the agriculture industry. The form and content of such documents shall be
reviewed and approved by the City prior to recordation.
24. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development the preferred alignment
and operational characteristics of the State Route 30 or SR-30 freeway. The form
and content of such documents shall be reviewed by the City prior to recordation.
25. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to clearing
and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
26. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase I
data testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified archeologist,
determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall
conduct Phase II archeological data recovery excavations.
27. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33- foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.
28. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition
207 Waiver of Claims forms. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder’s Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application
file for record.
Writer
Enrique Bojórquez Gaxiola
April 14, 2022
Team Leader
Racelle Escolar
Page 728
Staff Report: Z-77-21-7
April 14, 2022
Exhibits
Zoning sketch map
Aerial sketch map
Conceptual Site Plan date stamped December 3, 2021
Conceptual Building Elevations date stamped December 3, 2021 (12 pages)
Page 729
Page 730
Page 731
Page 732
Page 733
Page 734
Page 735
Page 736
Page 737
Page 738
Page 739
Page 740
Page 741
Page 742
Page 743
Page 744
Attachment C
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-77-21-7
Date of VPC Meeting April 19, 2022
Request From PUD
Request To R1-10
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location Southeast corner of 75th Avenue and Broadway Road
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 6-0
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
No members of the public registered to speak on this item.
Enrique Bojórquez Gaxiola, staff, introduced himself discussed the location of the
site, noting the surrounding land uses including the residential uses to the north of
Broadway Road. Mr. Bojórquez Gaxiola discussed the existing General Plan Land
Use Map designation, the Estrella Village Plan, the Estrella Arterial Street
Landscaping Program, and other policy documents. Mr. Bojórquez Gaxiola
discussed the conceptual site plans and building elevations for the proposed
residential units. Mr. Bojórquez Gaxiola concluded the presentation by providing the
staff findings and describing the proposed stipulations for the case.
William Lally, with Tiffany & Bosco P.A., introduced himself as the applicant for
case Z-77-21-7. Mr. Lally stated that he was involved in the Danzeisen Dairy Farms
PUD back in 2014 which was established the current zoning on the site. However,
due to changes in the area, a residential project would be a more appropriate
development. Mr. Lally described surrounding land uses, noting the proposed SR-30
freeway alignment south of the site. Mr. Lally discussed the proposed buffers around
the site and traffic improvements along Broadway Road. Mr. Lally concluded his
presentation by describing their public outreach and requesting approval of case Z-
77-21-7.
Ms. Perez thanked the applicant and expressed concern for the three-way
intersection along 75th Avenue and Broadway Road due to lack of safety. Ms. Perez
expressed concerns with the two traffic lanes proposed on Broadway Road. Ms.
Perez also stated that the multi-use trail is important and that she appreciates that
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 745
the applicant is planning for those future trails to connect the Rio Salado. Mr. Lally
stated that Maricopa County has been involved with designing the median locations
and they will continue to work with the Maricopa County Department of
Transportation (MCDOT) on how the cross section will be designed and what would
be the safest way for the traffic to ingress and egress from the site.
Mr. Perez stated that Broadway Road is extremely congested and asked the
applicant to explain the secondary access along 73rd Avenue and Wier Avenue as a
potential emergency exit. Mr. Lally stated that there have been many meetings
between MCDOT and the City of Phoenix and that they understand the importance
of contributing to the proposed traffic light on 75th Avenue and Broadway Road. Mr.
Lally stated that on the southeast corner of 73rd Avenue and Weir Avenue there
would be emergency access only and that the development is still working with
MCDOT on this location as a potential secondary access point to alleviate some of
the traffic congestion.
Ms. Perez asked the applicant to show more amenities on the site plan before the
rezoning case moves to Planning Commission, and stated that there is a lack of
connectivity in the area. Thus, more amenities are going to be important for the
development. Mr. Lally stated that they are vetting some of those details and that
their proposed open space percentage would allow for more amenities and for more
interaction between the residential units. Mr. Lally stated that he would contact Ms.
Perez prior to Planning Commission with more details regarding the proposed
amenities.
Beth Cartwright thanked the applicant and staff and stated that this case has
weighed on her because she has lived in the area for a long time and enjoys the
agricultural equestrian character of the area. Ms. Cartwright stated that she
understands that there will be a proposed SR-30 freeway and that would not be
appropriate for the agricultural character. Ms. Cartwright stated that she appreciates
the increase in the proposed open space and the importance of maintaining a part of
the equestrian lifestyle in the proposed development. Mr. Cartwright believes that
this development is appropriate for the area.
MOTION – Z-77-21-7:
Lisa Perez motioned to recommend approval of Z-77-21-7 per the staff
recommendation. Beth Cartwright seconded the motion.
VOTE – Z-77-21-7:
6-0, motion to recommend approval of Z-77-21-7 passed; with committee members
Ademolu, Cartwright, Perez, Rush, Terrazas, and Cardenas, in favor.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
No comments.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 746
Attachment D
ADDENDUM A
Staff Report: Z-77-21-7
April 29, 2022
Estrella Village Planning Committee April 19, 2022
Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 5, 2022
Request From: PUD (Planned Unit Development District)
(36.69 acres)
Request To: R1-10 (Single-Family Residence District)
(36.69 acres)
Proposed Use: Single-family residential
Location: Southeast corner of 75th Avenue and
Broadway Road
Owner: DNZ Holdings, LLC
Applicant: Lennar
Representative: William Lally, Tiffany & Bosco, PA
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations
The Estrella Village Planning Committee heard this rezoning request on April 19, 2022
and voted (6-0) to recommend approval per the staff recommendation. Following the
April 19, 2022 meeting, the applicant provided an updated site plan, attached to this
report, depicting a decrease in the number of lots from 159 to 152 on the subject site.
Furthermore, the updated site plan depicts a change in the lot layout and an increase in
the landscape setback width along the 75th Avenue alignment consistent with
Stipulation No. 3.
Staff does not recommend general conformance to the updated site plan as density
bonus points are being sought by the applicant following the rezoning process to
achieve the requested density. The subject site is also subject to other requirements
from the Subdivision Ordinance and street access approval from Maricopa County
Department of Transportation for any county-controlled streets.
Due to these changes, staff recommends modifying Stipulation No. 1 regarding a
minimum 140-foot lot depth applicable to lots backing onto the eastern perimeter of the
site.
Staff recommends approval, subject to stipulations, reflecting updates to the site plan,
provided below:
Page 747
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-77-21-7
April 29, 2022
Stipulations
1. Lots within 30 feet of WITH A REAR LOT LINE ALONG the eastern perimeter
property line OF THE SITE shall be a minimum of 140 feet in depth.
2. A minimum 15-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along the eastern
perimeter property line (s), as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
3. A minimum 30-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along the western
perimeter property line(s) along the 75th Avenue alignment, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
4. A minimum 10-foot-wide, average 15-foot, landscape setback shall be provided
along the south perimeter property line(s) abutting the State Route (SR) 30 freeway,
planted with large evergreen trees to provide a minimum 30-foot vertical screen at
maturity, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
5. The required landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 75 percent 2-inch
caliper and 25 percent 3-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on
center or in equivalent groupings, and five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department. Except that landscaping along arterial
streets shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping Program
landscape palette and landscaping standards in the Estrella Village, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the
developer shall work with the Planning and Development Department on alternative
design solutions consistent with a pedestrian environment.
6. Residential lots shall be a minimum 150 feet from the south perimeter property line
abutting the State Route (SR) 30 freeway alignment, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.
7. A perimeter wall no less than 6 feet in height shall be provided along the south
perimeter of the site adjacent to the State Route (SR) 30 freeway alignment. This
wall shall include material and textural differences, such as stucco and/or split face
block with a decorative element, such as tile or stamped designs, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.
8. An open space area shall be provided directly across the vehicular entrance from
Broadway Road into the development, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 748
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-77-21-7
April 29, 2022
9. All sidewalks within the development shall be detached with a minimum five-foot-
wide landscaped strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb and shall
include minimum 2-inch caliper single trunk shade trees planted at a rate of one tree
per lot or a minimum of 20 feet on center or equivalent groupings where adjacent to
open space areas, as modified and approved by the Planning and Development
Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning
and Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
10. The sidewalk along Broadway Road shall be a minimum of five feet in width and
detached from the curb, consistent with the City of Phoenix Street Classification
Map and planted to the following standards, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
a. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at maturity.
b. The landscape palette and planting standards, unless otherwise provided
herein, shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping
Program requirements for arterial streets.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
11. The developer shall dedicate a multi-use trail easement (MUTE) along the east side
of the 75th Avenue alignment in accordance with the MAG supplemental detail, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. The developer shall work
with the Site Planning section on an alternate design for this requirement through
the technical appeal process.
12. The developer shall construct one bus stop pad on this site on eastbound Broadway
Road. The bus stop pad shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard
Detail P1260 with a minimum depth of 10 feet and shall be spaced from the
intersection of 75th Avenue according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258.
13. The developer shall dedicate minimum 55 feet of right-of-way and construct the
south side of Broadway Road, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
14. The developer shall construct a minimum 14-foot-wide landscaped median along
Broadway Road, as approved by the Street Transportation Department.
15. Access control to Broadway Road shall meet current Street Transportation Planning
and Design Guidelines.
Page 749
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-77-21-7
April 29, 2022
16. The developer shall dedicate a tract for the east side of 75th Avenue of sufficient
width necessary to accommodate a City “D” Section Arterial Roadway for the
purposes of conditional right-of-way for the future 75th Avenue alignment, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
17. Access to existing MCDOT roadways shall require approval from Maricopa County.
18. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) to the City and MCDOT
for this development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the
study is reviewed and approved by the City and MCDOT. The TIS shall include
signal warrant analysis for the intersection of 75th Avenue and Broadway. Prior to
final site plan approval, the applicant will contribute 25-percent to the traffic signal at
75th Avenue and Broadway Road to the appropriate jurisdiction.
19. The developer shall underground all existing electrical utilities within the City public
right-of-way that are impacted or must be relocated as part of the project.
20. Existing irrigation facilities along Broadway Road are to be undergrounded and
relocated outside of City right-of-way. Contact SRP to identify existing land rights
and establish appropriate process to relocate facility. Relocations that require
additional dedications or land transfer require completion prior to obtaining plat
and/or civil plan review approval.
21. The developer shall construct all City streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. Adjacent street improvements shall apply to Broadway
Road only. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.
22. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development the existence and
operational characteristics of existing mining operations in the area. The form and
content of such documents shall be reviewed by the City prior to recordation.
23. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development the existence and
operational characteristics of agricultural uses. These documents must advise
purchasers that, under Section 3-112(E), Arizona Revised Statutes, the City of
Phoenix may not declare an agricultural operation conducted on farmland to be a
nuisance if the agricultural use is lawful, customary, reasonable, safe and necessary
to the agriculture industry. The form and content of such documents shall be
reviewed and approved by the City prior to recordation.
24. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development the preferred alignment
and operational characteristics of the State Route 30 or SR-30 freeway. The form
and content of such documents shall be reviewed by the City prior to recordation.
Page 750
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-77-21-7
April 29, 2022
25. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to clearing
and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
26. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase I
data testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified archeologist,
determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall
conduct Phase II archeological data recovery excavations.
27. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33- foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.
28. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition
207 Waiver of Claims forms. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder’s Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application
file for record.
Writer
Enrique Bojórquez Gaxiola
April 29, 2022
Team Leader
Racelle Escolar
Exhibits
Conceptual Site Plan date stamped April 27, 2022 (1 page)
Page 751
L:\21002625-DANZEISEN DAIRY FARM (LENNAR)\5-PLANNING\1-CAD\1-XREF\XR-2625-LOTTING PLAN.dwg
BROADWAY ROAD
(55' HALF STREET ROW)
703' 8' P.U.E.
30' L/S SETBACK
125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 RET. RET. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
50' PUBLIC STREET ROW (TYP.)
124 123 122 121 120 119 118 AMENITY 16 15 14 13 12 11 10
135 152
111 112 113 114 115 116 117 136 151 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
137 150
138 149
139 148
110 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 140 147 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24
141 146
TRACT FOR 142 145
98 36
FUTURE ROW, 97 99 100 101 102 32 33 34 35
ULTIMATE 143 144
DEDICATION TO BE
50' 96 15' L/S SETBACK
89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 76
30' L/S SETBACK 40
& M.U.T.E. 93 AMENITY 41
62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 42
RET. 61 60 59 58 57 56 46
RET. 49
WIER AVE
EMERGENCY
ACCESS
RET.
SITE DATA
BOUNDARY
SITE AREA (GROSS): 40.5 AC (+/-)
SITE AREA (NET): 38.0 AC (+/-)
ZONING: R1-10 PRD
# OF UNITS: 152
GROSS DENSITY: 3.8 DU/AC*
TYPICAL LOT SIZE: 45' x 120'
OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: 7.8 ACRES (19%)
*MAX. ALLOWED DENSITY FOR R1-10 ZONING IS 3.5 DU/AC. THIS SITE
IS SUBJECT TO MEETING DENSITY BONUS OF APPROX. 40 POINTS.
Copyright RVi
0 40' 80' 160'
BAILEY PARK
PHOENIX, AZ SCALE: 1" = 80'-0"
Information furnished regarding this property
120 S. Ash Avenue 2022-04-25 is from sources deemed reliable. RVi has
Tempe, Arizona 85281 not made an independent investigation of
Tel: 480.994.0994 21002625 these sources and no warranty is made as to
Page 752
www.rviplanning.com
their accuracy or completeness. This plan is
LENNAR conceptual, subject to change, and does not
represent any regulatory approval.
Attachment E
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
May 5, 2022
ITEM NO: 10
DISTRICT NO.: 7
SUBJECT:
Application #: Z-77-21-7
Location: Southeast corner of 75th Avenue and Broadway Road
From: PUD
To: R1-10
Acreage: 39.69
Proposal: Single-Family Residential
Applicant: Lennar
Owner: DNZ Holdings, LLC
Representative: William E. Lally, Tiffany & Bosco, PA
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Estrella 4/19/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 6-0.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Estrella Village Planning Committee
recommendation.
Motion Discussion: N/A
Motion details: Commissioner Perez made a MOTION to approve Z-77-21-7, per the Estrella
Village Planning Committee recommendation.
Maker: Perez
Second: Johnson
Vote: 8-0
Absent: Gaynor
Opposition Present: No
Findings:
1. This proposed development provides a housing option that is consistent with
development patterns in the general area.
2. As stipulated, the proposed development will promote the vision of various policy plans
including the Tree and Shade Master Plan, Estrella Village Area Plan and Estrella
Village Arterial Street Landscaping Program.
3. As stipulated, this development will serve as a gateway to the Rio Salado by providing
the first section of a new multi-use trail alignment via a trail easement that may
ultimately allow pedestrians along Broadway Road to connect to the Rio Salado.
Page 753
Stipulations:
1. Lots within 30 feet of the eastern perimeter property line shall be a minimum of 140
feet in depth.
2. A minimum 15-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along the eastern
perimeter property line (s), as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
3. A minimum 30-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along the western
perimeter property line(s) along the 75th Avenue alignment, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
4. A minimum 10-foot-wide, average 15-foot, landscape setback shall be provided along
the south perimeter property line(s) abutting the State Route (SR) 30 freeway, planted
with large evergreen trees to provide a minimum 30-foot vertical screen at maturity, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
5. The required landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 75 percent 2-inch
caliper and 25 percent 3-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on
center or in equivalent groupings, and five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department. Except that landscaping along arterial streets
shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping Program landscape
palette and landscaping standards in the Estrella Village, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work
with the Planning and Development Department on alternative design solutions
consistent with a pedestrian environment.
6. Residential lots shall be a minimum 150 feet from the south perimeter property line
abutting the State Route (SR) 30 freeway alignment, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
7. A perimeter wall no less than 6 feet in height shall be provided along the south
perimeter of the site adjacent to the State Route (SR) 30 freeway alignment. This wall
shall include material and textural differences, such as stucco and/or split face block
with a decorative element, such as tile or stamped designs, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
8. An open space area shall be provided directly across the vehicular entrance from
Broadway Road into the development, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
9. All sidewalks within the development shall be detached with a minimum five-foot-wide
landscaped strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb and shall include
minimum 2-inch caliper single trunk shade trees planted at a rate of one tree per lot or
a minimum of 20 feet on center or equivalent groupings where adjacent to open space
areas, as modified and approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian
environment.
10. The sidewalk along Broadway Road shall be a minimum of five feet in width and
detached from the curb, consistent with the City of Phoenix Street Classification Map
and planted to the following standards, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
Page 754
a. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at maturity.
b. The landscape palette and planting standards, unless otherwise provided
herein, shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping
Program requirements for arterial streets.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian
environment.
11. The developer shall dedicate a multi-use trail easement (MUTE) along the east side of
the 75th Avenue alignment in accordance with the MAG supplemental detail, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. The developer shall work
with the Site Planning section on an alternate design for this requirement through the
technical appeal process.
12. The developer shall construct one bus stop pad on this site on eastbound Broadway
Road. The bus stop pad shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard
Detail P1260 with a minimum depth of 10 feet and shall be spaced from the
intersection of 75th Avenue according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258.
13. The developer shall dedicate minimum 55 feet of right-of-way and construct the south
side of Broadway Road, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
14. The developer shall construct a minimum 14-foot-wide landscaped median along
Broadway Road, as approved by the Street Transportation Department.
15. Access control to Broadway Road shall meet current Street Transportation Planning
and Design Guidelines.
16. The developer shall dedicate a tract for the east side of 75th Avenue of sufficient width
necessary to accommodate a City “D” Section Arterial Roadway for the purposes of
conditional right-of-way for the future 75th Avenue alignment, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
17. Access to existing MCDOT roadways shall require approval from Maricopa County.
18. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) to the City and MCDOT for
this development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is
reviewed and approved by the City and MCDOT. The TIS shall include signal warrant
analysis for the intersection of 75th Avenue and Broadway. Prior to final site plan
approval, the applicant will contribute 25-percent to the traffic signal at 75th Avenue
and Broadway Road to the appropriate jurisdiction.
19. The developer shall underground all existing electrical utilities within the City public
right-of-way that are impacted or must be relocated as part of the project.
20. Existing irrigation facilities along Broadway Road are to be undergrounded and
relocated outside of City right-of-way. Contact SRP to identify existing land rights and
establish appropriate process to relocate facility. Relocations that require additional
dedications or land transfer require completion prior to obtaining plat and/or civil plan
review approval.
Page 755
21. The developer shall construct all City streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping, and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. Adjacent street improvements shall apply to Broadway
Road only. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.
22. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development the existence and
operational characteristics of existing mining operations in the area. The form and
content of such documents shall be reviewed by the City prior to recordation.
23. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development the existence and
operational characteristics of agricultural uses. These documents must advise
purchasers that, under Section 3-112(E), Arizona Revised Statutes, the City of Phoenix
may not declare an agricultural operation conducted on farmland to be a nuisance if
the agricultural use is lawful, customary, reasonable, safe, and necessary to the
agriculture industry. The form and content of such documents shall be reviewed and
approved by the City prior to recordation.
24. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of property within the development the preferred alignment and
operational characteristics of the State Route 30 or SR-30 freeway. The form and
content of such documents shall be reviewed by the City prior to recordation.
25. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall conduct
Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the development
area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to clearing and grubbing,
landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
26. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase I data
testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified archeologist, determines
such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall conduct Phase II
archeological data recovery excavations.
27. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33- foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the Archeology
Office to properly assess the materials.
28. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
Waiver of Claims forms. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder’s Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application
file for record.
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.
Page 756
CITY OF PHOENIX
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
FORM TO REQUEST PC to CC
I HEREBY REQUEST THAT THE CC HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON:
APPLICATION NO/ Z-77-21-7 (SIGNATURE ON ORIGINAL IN FILE)
LOCATION SEC of 75th Avenue opposition applicant x
& Broadway Road
APPEALED PC 525 E Camelback Road, 7th Floor
FROM: May 5, 2022 Phoenix, AZ 85016
PC DATE STREET/ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP
TO PC/CC CC Greg Loper; Tiffany & Bosco PA
HEARING June 1, 2022 602-550-7004
gl@tblaw.com
CC DATE NAME / PHONE / EMAIL
REASON FOR REQUEST:
Amend Stipulation #1 per Addendum 'A' to the staff report.
RECEIVED BY: Racelle Escolar RECEIVED ON: 5/12/2022
Alan Stephenson Vikki Cipolla-Murillo
Joshua Bednarek Greg Harmon
Tricia Gomes Paul M. Li
Racelle Escolar Village Planner – Nayeli Sanchez-Luna
Stephanie Vasquez GIS
Diana Hernandez Applicant
David Urbinato
Page 757
Page 758
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
MARCH 2 AND APRIL 6, 2022) - Public Hearing and Ordinance Adoption -
Rezoning Application Z-20-21-4 - Approximately 1,300 Feet North of the
Northeast Corner of Central Avenue and Indian School Road (Ordinance G-6964)
Request to hold a public hearing and amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section
601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-20-21-
4 and rezone the site from UR TOD-1 (Urban Residential, Interim Transit-Oriented
Zoning Overlay District One) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) to allow multifamily
and single-family attached residential.
Summary
Current Zoning: UR TOD-1
Proposed Zoning: PUD
Acreage: 4.34 acres
Proposed Use: Multifamily and single-family attached residential
Owner: Midtown Central Hotel Corporation
Applicant: Cresleigh Homes Arizona, LLC
Representative: Alan Beaudoin, Norris Design
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Info: The Encanto Village Planning Committee heard this case on June 7, 2021,
for information only.
VPC Action: The Encanto Village Planning Committee heard this case on Sept. 13,
2021, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote 11-3.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case and continued the item on Oct.
7, Nov. 4, Dec. 2, 2021; and Jan. 6, 2022. The Planning Commission heard this case
on Feb. 3, 2022, and recommended approval, per the Addendum A Staff Report, with
an additional and modified stipulation by a vote of 6-2.
CC Action: The City Council continued the request on March 2, 2022 to April 6, 2022 to
allow the item to be posted for a Public Hearing.
Location
Approximately 1,300 feet north of the northeast corner of Central Avenue and Indian
Page 759
School Road
Council District: 4
Parcel Address: 4325 N. Central Ave.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 760
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(Z-20-21-4) FROM UR TOD-1 (URBAN RESIDENTIAL, INTERIM
TRANSIT-ORIENTED ZONING OVERLAY DISTRICT ONE) TO
PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 4.34-acre site located approximately 1,300
feet north of the northeast corner of Central Avenue and Indian School Road, in a
portion of Section 20, Township 2 North and Range 3 East, as described more
specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from “UR TOD-1” (Urban Residential,
Interim Transit-Oriented Zoning Overlay District One) to “PUD” (Planned Unit
Development).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B.”
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,
Page 761
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. An updated Development Narrative for Uptown Residential Community PUD
reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval
of this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the
Development Narrative date stamped July 12, 2021, as modified by the following
stipulations:
a. Page 12, PUD Development Standards Table (Single-Family Attached),
Add a row titled “Pedestrian connections to Central Avenue” with the
following development standard: “Two pedestrian connections to the
Central Avenue sidewalk from a system of interior pedestrian pathways.
All units with a required stoop frontage type shall be connected to Central
Avenue by a direct pedestrian pathway. The pedestrian connections to the
public sidewalk shall be a minimum 5 feet wide.”
b. Page 12, PUD Development Standards Table (Single-Family Attached),
Add a row titled “Pedestrian system standards” with the following:
“Clearly defined, accessible pedestrian pathways shall be provided
to connect building entrances, public sidewalks, and amenity areas,
using the most direct route for pedestrians.”
c. Page 14, 4. Shade. Replace with the following language and formatting:
75 percent minimum shade shall be provided on public sidewalk
along Central Avenue.
75 percent minimum shade shall be provided on private walkways
through a combination of vegetative and architectural shade but
architectural shade shall not comprise more than 30 percent of the
total shade.
All interior pedestrian pathways shall be shaded to a minimum of 75
percent
d. Page 12, PUD Development Standards Table (Single-Family Attached),
Add a row titled “Pedestrian system standards” with the following:
“Clearly defined, accessible pedestrian pathways shall be provided to
connect building entrances, public sidewalks, and amenity areas, using
the most direct route for pedestrians.”
e. Page 15, 6. Walls and Fences, Replace the first sentence with the
following “Walls will be in accordance with the wall exhibits herein”
f. Page 15, PUD Wall & Fence Design Standards Table, Replace the
development standards for all perimeters adjacent to private parcels
located near the northwest and northeast corners of the PUD from “6’
minimum; 8’ maximum” to “maximum height of 6 feet.”
Page 762
g. Page 12, PUD Development Standards Table (Single-Family Attached),
Replace the development standards language for “WU Frontage Types”
with the following: “All units adjacent to Central Avenue shall comply with
the requirements of Section 1305, Table 1305.1. For stoop. Units 1
through 14, and 38 to 43, as depicted on the illustrative landscape plan
date stamped February 1, 2022 shall comply with the requirements of
Section 1305, Table 1305.1. For stoop with the frontage oriented to the
south. Minimum width: 60% of building façade”
h. Page 11, PUD Development Standards Table (Single-Family Attached),
Update “Maximum Projection by Porches, Patios, Balconies or port-
cocheres into required Perimeter setbacks” to add “Stoops.”
i. Page 15, 7. Central Avenue Frontage, Replace “Porch” With “Stoop.”
j. Page 8. B. Land Use Plan. Replace all descriptions of “Porch” Frontage
Types with “Stoop.”
k. Pages 9-10, 17, 22, 24, 25, and 30 - 34. Update the figures and exhibits
contained in the narrative to be consistent with the illustrative landscape
plan date stamped February 1, 2022 and add the architectural rendering
figures date stamped February 1, 2022, to reflect the change from “porch”
to “stoop” frontages and the added pedestrian pathway along the south
property line.
l. Page 26, Section E.2. Architectural Design. Add the following to the
beginning of the list and renumber the remaining entries: “The
development shall be in general conformance with the architectural
renderings with specific regard to parapet design, four-sided architecture,
and multiple colors and materials on each building face, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.”
m. Page 3, Table of Contents. Update the table of contents to include the
architectural renderings and renumber pages accordingly.
2. The developer shall dedicate a 12-foot Image Enhancement Easement along the
east side of Central Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
3. The developer shall provide improvements on Central Avenue in compliance with
the Central Avenue Image Enhancement guidelines, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
4. The developer shall dedicate a public access easement along the northern site
boundary to provide legal access to APN 155-25-001L, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
Page 763
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
6. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed
and approved by the City Attorney.
7. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.
8. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction
analysis review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
9. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
10. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
11. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
12. A maximum one point of ingress/egress shall be allowed onto Central Avenue,
not including the shared easement located along the north boundary of the
subject site. The width of the vehicular ingress/egress shall be no greater than 30
feet, as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department.
13. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition
207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa
County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.
Page 764
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 2nd day of March,
2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 765
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-20-21-4
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH,
RANGE 3 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20 FROM
WHICH THE CENTER QUARTER CORNER BEARS NORTH 0°15'41” EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 2636.90 FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER NORTH
0°15'41" EAST A DISTANCE OF 1352.76 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST LINE, NORTH 0°15'41" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET;
THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE, SOUTH 89°44'19" EAST A DISTANCE OF
250.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND
DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 2009-0913462, MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDS;
THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL, NORTH 0°15'41" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF AND TO A
POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN
DOCUMENT NUMBER NOD-15422 MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDS;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE SOUTH 89°44'19" EAST A DISTANCE OF
200.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF
LAND DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 2009-0913462, MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDS;
THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL SOUTH 0°15'41" WEST A
DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF;
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL SOUTH 89°44'19" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL AND
TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND
DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 1996-0877263 MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDS;
THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL SOUTH 0°15'41" WEST A
DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET;
THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE NORTH 89°44'19" WEST A DISTANCE OF
550.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINS 187500 SQUARE FEET OR 4.3044 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
Page 766
Page 767
Page 768
Page 769
Page 770
Page 771
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
11, 2022) - Public Hearing - Certificate of Appropriateness - Appeal of Historic
Preservation Commission's Decision on Certificate of Appropriateness
Application HPCA 2100392 - 2215 N. 9th St. in the Coronado Historic District
Request to hold a public hearing on a Certificate of Appropriateness Decision by the
Historic Preservation (HP) Commission on Certificate of Appropriateness
Application HPCA 2100392 for 2215 N. 9th St. in the Coronado Historic District for a
request to build two attached dwelling units, one two-story and the other single-story,
on the 134 feet by 50 feet vacant parcel. Requested City Council action is to uphold,
reverse or modify the HP Commission’s Certificate of Appropriateness decision.
Summary
On Jan. 11, 2022, the HP Hearing Officer held a public hearing to review this
application, which was filed by Michael Gilson of Accurate Estimating on behalf of the
property owner, LG Properties Plus, LLC. The application at that time was for the
construction of two, two-story dwelling units connected by a one-story carport with a
total of 2,835 square feet under roof. The hearing officer approved the Certificate of
Appropriateness subject to the following stipulations:
1. That any proposed gate or fencing over 3 feet in height be stepped back 3
feet from the front corners of the primary dwelling;
2. That window headers be changed to sills; and
3. That the parapet have a varied roofline - increases above existing roofline
to be minimal in height and width subject to approval of Historic Preservation
staff.
The Hearing Officer’s decision was appealed on Jan. 14, 2022 by five appellants:
Carol Simmons, Cody Castelletti, Donna Reiner, Arthur Vigil III, and Heidi D'Angelo.
After meeting with the appellants, the applicant revised the proposed plans to reduce
the height of the rear dwelling unit to one-story and change the roof form of the front
dwelling. The proposed modifications were supported by staff.
The appeal was heard before the HP Commission on Feb. 14, 2022 and was
continued to the March 21, 2022 HP Commission meeting to allow for the applicant to
Page 772
meet with the appellants and compile additional information to demonstrate the
compatibility of the proposed plans with the surrounding neighborhood.
Subsequent to the Feb. 14, 2022 HP Commission meeting, two of the appellants
provided design suggestions to the applicant. The applicant modified the roof form and
style of the dwelling and reduced the total square footage under roof to 2,697. The
proposed modifications were supported by Historic Preservation staff.
At the March hearing, the HP Commission voted 6-1 to modify the Hearing Officer's
decision to approve the current revised plan set (dated March 14, 2022). The HP
Commission's decision was appealed on March 25, 2022 by four appellants: Carol
Simmons, Donna Reiner, Arthur Vigil III, and Heidi D'Angelo.
Staff finds that the proposed work meets the Standards for Consideration of
Appropriateness set forth in Section 812.D of the Zoning Ordinance. While the
neighboring properties are single-story, the historic building which was previously
located on the parcel was a two-story dwelling. The former building was roughly 23
feet in height and the proposed front dwelling would be roughly 26 feet at its tallest
point. That peak ridge height is stepped back roughly 24 feet from the westernmost
portion of the front facade which itself is stepped back 25 feet from the front property
line. The westernmost portion of the dwelling has a roof height of 23 feet matching the
no longer extant historic dwelling. The adjacent single-story historic buildings are set
back 21 feet and 19 feet from the front property lines. This proposed design serves to
meet the guideline for new construction which states that "where changes in size must
occur, the visual impact of the new construction should be minimized by stepping back
the new construction from the historic buildings." Staff also recognizes that the
applicant reduced the height of the rear unit to be one-story and modified the overall
footprint in order to reduce the size and massing of the dwelling. Design changes were
also made, based on response to the appellants, to alter the roof form, windows, front
door opening, and front porch, as the Historic Preservation Guidelines note, to
"resemble those related forms found on adjacent or surrounding structures."
Staff recommends that the City Council uphold the HP Commission's March 21, 2022
decision to approve the most recent plan submitted by the applicant to the Historic
Preservation Office on March 14, 2022.
Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the city.
Page 773
Concurrence/Previous Action
· The HP Hearing Officer approved the Certificate of Appropriateness on Jan. 11,
2022 with three stipulations.
· The Hearing Officer's decision was appealed on Jan. 14, 2022 by five appellants:
Carol Simmons, Cody Castelletti, Donna Reiner, Arthur Vigil III, and Heidi D'Angelo.
· The HP Commission voted 6-1 to modify the hearing officer's decision on March 21,
2022 to approve the plan set submitted by the applicant in March of 2022.
· The HP Commission's decision was appealed on March 25, 2022 by four
appellants: Carol Simmons, Donna Reiner, Arthur Vigil III, and Heidi D'Angelo.
Location
2215 N. 9th St.
Council District: 4
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning
and Development Department.
Page 774
ATTACHMENT A
STAFF REPORT
To: City of Phoenix Historic Preservation Commission
From: Helana Ruter, Historic Preservation Planner II
Subject: Appeal of Hearing Officer’s Decision – Application No. HPCA 2100392
2215 N 9th Street, Coronado Historic District
This is a report to request the Historic Preservation Commission modify the decision of the
Historic Preservation Hearing Officer to approve Certificate of Appropriateness Application No.
HPCA 2100392, subject to a revised plan submitted by the applicant on March 14, 2022.
Background
The original application was to allow the construction of two, two-story dwelling units connected
by a single-story carport with a total 2,835 sf footprint under roof at the subject property. The
hearing was held on January 11, 2022.
The Hearing Officer, Janet Reed, approved the application subject to three stipulations:
1. Any proposed gate or fencing over 3’ in height be stepped back 3’ from the front corners
of the primary dwelling;
2. Change window headers to sills; and
3. Parapet to have a varied roofline – increases above existing roofline to be minimal in
height and width subject to approval of Historic Preservation staff.
The Hearing Officer’s decision was appealed on January 14, 2022, by five appellants including:
Carol Simmons, Cody Castelletti, Donna Reiner, Arthur Vigil III, and Heidi D’Angelo.
Subsequent to the filing of the appeals, there was additional discussion between the applicant
and appellants that resulted in a new version of the plan, received by staff on February 7, 2022.
The changes, which included a reduction in height of the rear dwelling unit to one-story, were
supported by staff.
The appeal was heard by the Historic Preservation Commission on February 14, 2022, and
continued to the March 21, 2022, HPC meeting.
Subsequent to the February 14, 2022, HPC meeting, there were continued discussions between
the applicant and appellants which resulted in a further modified proposal submitted on March
14, 2022. Staff is in support of the revised proposal.
Page 775
Recommendation
Staff supports the proposed changes made in the March 14th submittal.
Attachments: Appeal Forms and appellant letter (7 pages)
Staff Report (8 pages)
Hearing Plans (10 pages)
Phoenix Historic Neighborhoods Coalition letter (3 pages)
Plan submittal from February 7, 2022 (7 pages)
Plan submittal from March 14, 2022 (8 pages)
Page 776
Page 777
Page 778
Page 779
Page 780
Page 781
Page 782
Page 783
PHOENIX HISTORIC PRESERVATION HEARING OFFICER
Staff Report
Certificate of Appropriateness
2215 North 9th Street
Case No. HPCA 2100392
January 11, 2022
Background
This is a Certificate of Appropriateness application to construct two, two-story dwelling units at the
subject property. The property is zoned R-3 HP (multi-family residential with historic preservation
overlay). It is also within the boundaries of the Coronado Neighborhood Special Planning District (SPD). The
application was filed by Michael Gilson of Accurate Estimating on behalf of owner LG Properties Plus, LLC.
Previous Applications
The following applications have been reviewed by the HP Office since the property received historic
designation in 1986:
Application No. Application Type Scope of Work Date Approved
HPDE 1600401 Demolition Approval Total demolition Denied – October
16, 2016
HPCA 1700130 Certificate of Two-story addition Withdrawn
Appropriateness
HPCA 1700521 Certificate of Infill – two-story residence and April 26, 2018
Appropriateness detached garage with second
story living unit
HPDE 1800461 Demolition Approval Total demolition September 13,
Property Description
The subject property consists of a 134 ft by 50 ft vacant parcel located within the Coronado Historic
District. The ca. 1925 house on the property was declared an imminent hazard by the City of Phoenix
Building Official in September of 2021 and was subsequently demolished. Please refer to the street view
photos, inventory form and aerial of the parcel.
Proposed Work
The applicant proposes to construct two, two-story dwelling units connected by a single-story carport.
The footprint of the dwelling, with carport, would be 2,835 square feet. The front dwelling would have a
footprint under roof of approximately 1622 sf with the rear unit approximately 760 sf attached through a
single-story carport. The total lot coverage of the proposed project would be 43%.
The first story of the front facade of the primary dwelling would incorporate a shed roof with a recessed
5’10” x 16’11” front porch area. The front façade would be set back 25’ from the front property line. The
historic dwelling (demolished) was set back 20’ from the front property line. The front setbacks along the
Page 784
HPCA 2100392, 2215 N 9th Street
east side of 9th Street generally range from 18’ to 21’. The home immediately to the north (2217 N 9th
Street) has a setback of approximately 21’ and the home to the north of that (2223 N 9th Street) has a
setback of approximately 22’ from the property line. The home immediately to the south of the subject
property (2209 N 9th Street) has a setback 19’ from the property line.
The proposed primary dwelling would be two-story with a flat roof and parapet with a height of 22’7
3/8” above finished floor. The ridge height of the demolished dwelling, above finished floor, was 22’8”.
The first-floor ceiling would be 9’ in height with the second story ceiling at 8’ in height. The rear dwelling
would have a parapet height of approximately 22’ with the first and second floor ceiling heights at 8’.
The home immediately to the north (2217 N 9th Street) has a ridge height of 12’ with the ridge height of
the home to its north (2223 N 9th Street) at 13’. The home immediately to the south (2209 N 9th Street)
has a ridge height of 18’. The height of the parapet for the single-story carport – stretching between the
two buildings – would be 12’5 3/8”.
The shed roof, along the first story front façade of the primary dwelling, would be red barrel tile with the
recessed front porch section supported by 2-6”x6” wood posts. Similarly, wood-framed awnings above
the windows on the second story of the front façade would be covered with red barrel tile. The windows
would be vinyl in a combination of double hung and sliding operating systems. The windows would be
recessed 2 inches from the wall with exterior wood headers.
A 6’ tall concrete block fence would be constructed along the northern and southern property lines. A 6’
tall wrought iron gate would extend from the front (southwest) corner of the dwelling to the block fence
and provide auto access to the interior carport. Additionally, approximately 42’ of 6’ tall wrought iron
fence/gate would be located along the rear (eastern) property line to provide access to uncovered
parking at the rear of the second dwelling.
Findings
The City of Phoenix’s “General Design Guidelines for Historic Properties”
(https://www.phoenix.gov/pddsite/Documents/pdd_hp_pdf_00035.pdf) recommend compatible new
construction within historic districts:
Similar Scale New Construction
x Within the historic residential areas, new construction should be similar in height, shape and
materials to the historic structures in its vicinity. Where changes in size must occur, the visual
impact of the new construction should be minimized by stepping back the new construction
from the historic buildings.
x Building features, such as roof lines, window and door openings, porches, entrances, pergolas,
porte-cocheres or carports should resemble those related forms found on adjacent or
surrounding historic strictures.
The demolished building on the property was unique in that it was the only primary two-story dwelling
on 9th Street between Monte Vista Road and Oak Street (three, two-story dwellings exist as alley
houses). A new primary two-story dwelling on the site would inherently create a building that is taller
than the historic structures in the immediate vicinity. However, the proposed building would incorporate
a flat roof so as not to exceed the height of the former historic dwelling and disrupt precedent.
The R-3 zoning and the Coronado Neighborhood SPD require a 25’ front yard setback for new
construction on vacant lots. This would set the new construction back from the front facades of the
adjacent historic properties. Additionally, the proposed design of the primary dwelling incorporates a
Page 785
HPCA 2100392, 2215 N 9th Street
roughly 5’ deep single-story portion along the front façade with a recessed porch. This single-story
segment would further step the two-story height back from the adjacent single-story historic dwellings.
In order to reduce the overall massing of the two units, under one roof, an interior, single-story carport
was incorporated into the site plan. The second unit would also have a modest reduction in height from
the primary unit.
While the historic homes along this section of 9th Street are primarily Bungalow, Vernacular, or Ranch-
style, Spanish Colonial Revival is characterized by the Coronado Neighborhood SPD as one of the four
most common architectural styles in the Coronado Historic District. The proposed flat roofs of the
dwelling units serve to reduce the overall proposed height, while the stucco walls and additions of the
red barrel tile first story roof and awnings add characteristics of Spanish Colonial design. The recessed
double-hung windows resemble forms on surrounding structures with the lack of sills and modern
materials defining new construction.
Recommendation
Based on the findings above, staff recommends approval of this application with the following stipulation:
1. Any proposed gate or fencing over 3’ in height be stepped back 3’ from the front corners of the
primary dwelling.
Subject to this stipulation the application is consistent with the Standards for Consideration of a
Certificate of Appropriateness as set forth in Section 812.D of the Zoning Ordinance.
Helana Ruter
Historic Preservation Planner
Attachments: Photos, inventory form and aerial
Page 786
HPCA 2100392, 2215 N 9th Street.
Historic dwelling (from google street view, facing east) demolished 2021
Now vacant lot, facing east
Page 787
HPCA 2100392, 2215 N 9th Street.
Adjacent property to south, view facing southeast
Adjacent properties to north, view facing northeast
Page 788
Page 789
Page 790
Planning and Development
±
1 inch = 37 feet
Disclaimer : The information provided on this map is based on record drawings submitted by others.
0 15 30 60 Feet Date: 1/7/2022
Users of this information are cautioned that independent verification of actual conditions may be necessary. P rinting Water Data is for Internal Staff Only
Page 791
4
4 0 0 :;
'J 4 4 C
9 C 9 C
99 4
K 9 J 'J 4 C
9JGA
8
K 0
8 !"#$%& '
J
8 ()*+,+-+./ 0
.1
0@A
:;8 CK8KK
&AJ AJ CK8KK84 84 @48 2./+/3 '
AJ
: ;
AJ 4 '
J 9
$-#"+51+./ 0
' A 8
'A'J
J $#1+./.6/-7+5 !/3$'' '
:9 A ;
%$,!1+./'
A''J
/$%!>$"K6+*$CK1>5$3>5-(<-7$!17+/3!55%+$*5!"!%%$%1.?
6..*-1(*-K.A#A6+17'CK3!%,!/+L$*"..=+/3/!+%-K.A#A!1,$"1+#!%M.+/1-!/*&K
J
8 .A#A!1+/1$"<$*+!1$-1(*-!/*1.5!/*).11.<5%!1$-AI.+/1-.=3>5-(<-7$!17+/3
J )$%$=1(/1"$!1$*A?1$"+."#%!**+/31.)$!11!#7$*17".(37-7$!17+/31.-1(*-A
@2
4 8 /$%!>$"CK1>5$3>5-(<6!%%).!"*@6!1$" "$-+-1!/13>5-(<)!#N+/3
).!"*@."3>5-(<,$/$$")!-$!55%+$*5!"!%%$%."!1"+371!/3%$-1.-1(*-6+17*#.!1$* /1$"/!1+./!%(+%*+/3.*$:;
C4 J
/!+%-@&CK%./3@AK-7!/N@CK7$!*-@&K.A#A: ;
/1$"/!1+./!% $-+*$/1+!%.*$: ;
0 :9 A ;
!-$%!>$"CK1>5$3>5-(<6!%%).!"*!55%+$*!1"+371!/3%$-1.6..*"..=1"(--$-K /1$"/!1+./!%4$#7!/+#!%.*$:4;
.A#A6+17CK>5$ ."*">6!%%-#"$6-K.A#A9!#$%!>$"CK1>5$3>5-(<
6!%%).!"*."3>5-(<,$/$$")!-$!55%+$*!1"+371!/3%$-1.1"(--$-6+17&CK>5$ ."
*">6!%%-#"$6-K.A#A!1M.+/1-!/*+/1$"<$*+!1$1"(--$-!/*CK>5$*">6!%%
/1$"/!1+./!%%(<)+/3.*$:;
-#"$6-K.A#A5%!#$*K)!#N./$+17$"-+*$.=$/*M.+/1-AI.+/1-.==-$1K=".<)!-$
/+=."<%(<)+/3.*$:;
J
&&
0 0
J
%!>$"M.+/1-A ..*1"(--$--(55."1+/3CK6..*-1"(#1("!%5!/$%-!55%+$*!1"+371!/3%$-
1.1"(--$-6+17*/!+%-A55".5"+!1$"..=#.,$"+/3A
/1$"/!1+./!%9($%!-.*$:9;
/1$"/!1+./!%/$"3>./-$",!1+./.*$:;
9 A 9 49
4 : ; /1$"/!1+./!%?+-1+/3(+%*+/3.*$:;
0 8 /1$"/!1+./!%6+<<+/3..%!/*5!.*$:;
& !1+./!%%$#1"+#!%.*$: ;
A9 99 4 9 4
J
4%$,!1.".*$-
J 4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
AJ
0 8
9 4@
0
4 0 0 9
K 9 J 8
4
4
DKDJ A 9 4 9
9 4 8
9
JK 4 9 9 8A0 8
80 99
4 8 9B
0 @ 4 0 994
9 8 8 8 89 8
4
9
4 9 4 9A
&&
4 C
0 0 984
4 A9 8 @
9 99 4 4 4 @
8 9 4 9
0 @'F9 @ 98
' 9 A
@ @
8
8 4
4
4 :; 0@A
4 0 'J 8 A
9 8 4 8
'
: 4 8;
4
4 4 A9A
4
0 9 @F9
@&F9
0 9 @F9
&F9 &F9
0
8C : ; F9 F9
'F9
'F9
F9 F9
0 8
8
09 F9
0 9 &'F9
@'F9 4
8C : ; 'F9 'F9
F9
0
F9
4 D
0D @'F9
0 8@
0D 'F9 8
&
A9A 9D @'A9A
'
D @&A9A E 9 0 D 'E
E 9 0 D4E 8
9 8
8 A 48
8
84
4 0
C 4
0 48 4
9 A9 DA
4A 9 @A4A4 A '
9 4 9 @ G
4 @ 'G @
0 F H
9 I A CC 9
4 42
Page 792
J K&J K
F9
9 F9
F9
0 '
DCKDJ
+37$-1 .(37$+%+/3
9 9
$!*$" $!*$"
J AK
J AK J A&K J A'K
J K J ''CK J K
Page 793
J 'CK J K 'CK J K
J K J K 'J 'K
C9
0
DCKDJ
J 'CK J K 'CK J K J CKCK
J K J K 'J 'K
:4 ;
J K J ''CK J K J 'CK
9 9 $!*$" $!*$"
+37$-1 +*3$
+37$-1 .(37$+%+/3
J AK J A&K
J AK
J AK
J A'K
' A 8
@ @
8
4 4 @2
CC 0@A && &&
A 9 4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
4 8 9
9
4
0@A
9
J J
&AJ
J J J J
AJ 9 J
J A'J
AJ
A&&J AJ
AJ J A'J
A&J
J
'J
9
J
J&'C
'J
8
J DKDJ
Page 794
8 J
' A 8
@ @
8
4 4 @2
CC 0@A && &&
A 9 4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
4 8 9
9 '
4
0@A
0
0
Page 795
C
C
' A 8
@ @
8
4 4 @2
CC 0@A && &&
A 9 4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
4 8 9
9
4
0@A
4 8
J9
'J9
'J
Page 796
A
A
' A 8
@ @
8
4 4 @2
CC 0@A && &&
A 9 4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
4 8 9
9
4
0@A
J CK
J CK
J &CK J CK J CK J CK J 'CK J CK
J &CK 'CK
'J
4
' 4
J K'J K
F9
8 0 &J KJ K
&J &K'J K F9
0@A
J &CK 'F9 4 C
& &J &KJ K
F9
J KJ K
4 F9
J KJ K 948 4
'F9 J KJ K C
F9
' A 8
J K'J 'K
J K
F9
J &CK
J J
@2
& 99 J CK
J KJ K
'F9
J KJ K 8
J KJ K
&&
J KJ K
F9 F9 F9
&C
J 'CK
4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
948
J K'J K
'F9
4I 4
J &KJ 'K 8
%$,!1+./' F9
0
J KJ 'K
J 'F9 J
'4 &F9
J KJ K
9
F9
'J &K&J K
&F9 J
J 4
&& 9
8
0
J KJ K
'F9 '
@ @
8
J KJ K
'CK 'CK
J F9 &J 'CK 4
0@A
'J CK J &'CK
J 'CK
A
4 8
9 9 DCKDJ& C
'J 'CK J 'CK &J 'CK J CK J CK J CK J CK
J CK J &CK
'CK CK CK
J &CK J &CK J ''CK
J CK
'J 'J 'J 'J J CK 'J J K 'J J CK 'J
J CK
J 'CK
9 9
&J CK
&J &KJ K J KJ K
9 4 9 ' F9 F9
J CK
K K
4 9 4 9 '
J K
J KJ K
'J F9
'CK
4 4
J KJ K J KJ K
F F9 &J &KJ K &F9 F
J
F9 9 4 9 ' 0
DCKDJ DCKDJ
'J KJ K
'J &F9
4
J &KJ K J KJ K
&F9 F9
J 'CK
'J
F 9 4
80
DCKDJ
J CK
'J K'J K
&F9
J KJ K
J CK
9 4 9 ' 'F9
J CK
'
9 4
8 J KJ &K
'J CK
F9
9
'CK
J 9 4
J KJ K
'F9
DCKDJ
J CK
&
J CK
%$,!1+./' 8
J KJ &K
& &
J KJ K J 'J K'J K 'J 9 4
F9 &F9 F9
CK 08
J K'J 'K
'J &K'J 'K 99 4 4
F9 J KJ K
F9 &J KJ 'K F9 9 4
'CK
&F9
'J
9 4 CK
&CK
J &CK
J KJ K 0
J 'CK
J CK
8 4 'F9
4
J KJ K J KJ K J KJ K
J 'CK
&F9 F9 F9
'J 4 F
J KJ K
F9 DCKDJ
'J CK
' K4 CK
J 'CK
J K'J 'K
9
J K
&F9
J KJ K K4 CK
F9
9
K49
CC 9
J &CK
J 'CK J CK 'J '&CK J CK 'J &CK CK CK K4 C
J 'CK 'J 'J 'J 'J J K 'J
'J CK J CK J K J CK 'J 'CK J CK J CK J CK J K
Page 797
4
0@A
' A 8
!" " !"# " " $ $
% % " " "# " % " $ $
" " "# " " $ $
% # " &" "#&&" #$ ##%"'( %" $) $
) %" &" "#&&" # ##&"'( %" $) $ @2
" &" "#& " % ##)"'( " $ $
! % % " &" "#& " % ##"'( " $ $
" &" "#& " ##%"'( $ $
&&
& ) ) # " " "#" #$ ##%"'( %" $) $
% % # " &" "#&&" #$ ##"'( %" $) $
# " &" "#& " ##%"'( $ $
" &" "#& " % ##)"'( " $ $
" " "# " % ##)"'( " $ $
% # " " "# " #$ ##%"'( %" $) $ 4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
) # " &" "#&&" #$ ##%"'( %" $) $
% " " "# " % ##)"'( " $ $
! " " %"# " % ##!"'( " $ $
% ) % " " "# " % ##"'( " $ $
& " " "# " ##%"'( $ $
" " "# " % ##)"'( " $ $
&" " & "# " % ##"'( " $ $
" " %"# " % ##!"'( " $ $
% % % " " "# " % ##"'( " $ $ 9
) % % % " &" )"#& " %$ % # #)"'( " $ $
) ) # " &" "#& " # #)"'( $ $ 4
! # " &" %"#&&" #$ ##!"'( %" $) $
&& 9
# %" &" "#&&" #$# ##&"'( %" $) $
) ) " " "#" ##%"'( $) $ @ @
%% %% % " )" )"#) " # #)"'( $) $
" " "# " ##%"'( $) $ 8
% % % " % " "#)" ##%"'( $) $ 4
) ) & ) " " "#" ##%"'( $) $
0@A
% % " " "# " ##%"'( $) $
! %" %" "#" ##&"'( $) $
% % " % " "#)" ##%"'( $) $ A
& " %" "#" ##%"'( $) $
4 8
0
4
4 8 9
9 '
4 8
0 8
K
4 9
9
&
CC 9
Page 798
C
J CK
J &CK J CK J CK J CK J 'CK J CK
J &CK 'CK
'J
4
&
&
)
J &CK !
0@A
C
4 9
84
' A 8
&
J K
4
9
J &CK
K9 4 9 4 '
CK 8 4 8
9 &
'
K AA
@2
98
:; !
4
J CK %
C84
'CKAA J
'C %
K
9 :4 ; 9
9 'C
* GKAA 84 &
&&
&CK
84
& )
'J &CK
J 'CK
)
C
4
K'
4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
CK %
K
9
K A
:;
9
9 4
9
J
J
4
9
8
&&
%
9
@ @
'CK 'CK
J &J 'CK 8
4
'J CK J &'CK
0@A
C
J 'CK
9 9 9 4
&J CK
9 DCKDJ A
4 8
'J 'CK J 'CK &J 'CK J CK J CK J CK J CK
J CK J &CK
'CK CK CK
J &CK J &CK J ''CK
J CK
'J 'J 'J 'J J CK 'J J K 'J J CK 'J
) ) ) ) ) )
J CK
J 'CK
# #
&J CK
J K J CK
'J )
'CK
&
)
'J )
'9
J 'CK
%&* 'J
!
"
J CK
' # # $$
J CK
! % $$
J CK
% )
& $&
&
' !
'J CK
!
(
) ( &
$
'CK
$
!
J CK
J CK
! ! 'J
CK
&
'CK
&
'J
)
)
&CK
J &CK
J 'CK
J CK
&
J 'CK
'J
)
'J CK
J
J 'CK J K
) ) )
) ) )
J &CK
J 'CK J CK 'J '&CK J CK 'J &CK CK CK
J 'CK 'J 'J 'J 'J J K 'J
CC 9
'J CK J CK J K J CK 'J 'CK J CK J CK J CK J K
&J CK
9 9 DCKDJ
Page 799
4
9 4 9 '
J&'C
9 J 9 4 9 ' 9
J K
9
J K
0@A
9C
+37$-1 +*3$
J CK
J K
9 J AK
9
9 &
9 J'C
' A 8
$!*$"
&J A&K
4
&
@2
9
J 'CK
J CK
J &'CK
9C
J K
'J CK
4 8
&&
K K 9 &
9
9 J'C
4 $!*$"
4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
J AK
J 'CK
J 'CK J CK
J CK J K
JK
9 9 9
J AK
4
&& 9
C0 DCKDJ
@ @
8
4
0@A
A
4 8
J 'CK &CK
9 4 9 4 CKDJ
J&'C 9
CK
9 J A'K
J 'CK
J 'CK
K J 'CK
J 'CK
K
B&'C +37$-1 +*3$ +37$-1 +*3$
9
J AK J AK
%!>
J 'CK
J 'CK
K
9 & 9 9J
J 'CK
J CK
'J K 'J K
+37$-1 +*3$
.
J CK
J AK
&
$!*$" $!*$"
$!*$" J AK J AK
K 4 8 9 &J A&K
J CK J CK
'
J CK J K
J &'CK
J K J K
J K J 'CK
CK
J CK
J &'CK
K CK
J CK K
CK
J CK K
9 9JC
J K
J K
"
J
$!*$" $!*$" J CK $!*$"
K J AK J AK J AK
J CK
J CK J K J K &J CK J K J K
J K J 'K J &K J K J K KK
4 &
4 4 9 9 K 9 9
94 & J AK J AK
K 9 9 9
K J AK
9 89 4 8
C0 DCKDJ
9 C 0 DCKDJ
CC 9
Page 800
4
0@A
' A 8
J&'C 9
@2
9 J
J CK
J K
9 9
K 9 +37$-1 .(37$+%+/3
J K
9
J A&K
&&
J CK
J K
J &CK
$!*$"
&J A&K 4 $!*$"
4 J A&K
4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
8 9
J K J K
'
J K J K
9
%!>
J CK
.
J CK
CK
J CK K
&
J J
K ''CK
+37$-1 +*3$ +37$-1 +*3$
J A'K J A'K
'J 'CK
K9
J K
K9 9 9J'C
J J 'CK
9
J K
$!*$" & 4 99
K9
J AK 4 &
9 4 $!*$"
4
J AK
9
&&
J K
4
J K J K
J K J K
9 9 9 9
@ @
J AK J AK K
8
4
0@A
0 DCKDJ A
4 8
J CK
J CK
K K AA
J CK
J CK
K9 K AA
' 04'
' '
(+%1 /4+#".6!,$1!/*!"*
J K
'K
.(/*.%%!"* ' ' '
:0 ';DCKDJ
CC 9
Page 801
4
:;
'I 4 4 C
9 C 9 C
99 4
9IEA
J 9 I 8
J 0
8 !"#$%& '
I
8 ()*+,+-+./ 0
.1
0@A
:;8 CJ8JJ
&AI AI CJ8JJ84
: ;
84 @48
2./+/3 '
4 '
9
$-#"+51+./ 0
' A 8
'A'I
I $#1+./.6/-7+5 !/3$'' '
:9 A ;
AI
/$%!>$"J6+*$CJ1>5$3>5-(<-7$!17+/3!55%+$*5!"!%%$%1.?
6..*-1(*-J.A#A6+17'CJ3!%,!/+K$*"..=+/3/!+%-J.A#A!1,$"1+#!%L.+/1-!/*&J
I
8 .A#A!1+/1$"<$*+!1$-1(*-!/*1.5!/*).11.<5%!1$-AH.+/1-.=3>5-(<-7$!17+/3
I )$%$=1(/1"$!1$*A?1$"+."#%!**+/31.)$!11!#7$*17".(37-7$!17+/31.-1(*-A
@2
4 8 /$%!>$"CJ1>5$3>5-(<6!%%).!"*@6!1$" "$-+-1!/13>5-(<)!#M+/3
).!"*@."3>5-(<,$/$$")!-$!55%+$*5!"!%%$%."!1"+371!/3%$-1.-1(*-6+17*#.!1$* /1$"/!1+./!%(+%*+/3.*$:;
C4 I
/!+%-@&CJ%./3@AJ-7!/M@CJ7$!*-@&J.A#A: ;
/1$"/!1+./!% $-+*$/1+!%.*$: ;
0 :9 A ;
!-$%!>$"CJ1>5$3>5-(<6!%%).!"*!55%+$*!1"+371!/3%$-1.6..*"..=1"(--$-J /1$"/!1+./!%4$#7!/+#!%.*$:4;
.A#A6+17CJ>5$ ."*">6!%%-#"$6-J.A#A9!#$%!>$"CJ1>5$3>5-(<
6!%%).!"*."3>5-(<,$/$$")!-$!55%+$*!1"+371!/3%$-1.1"(--$-6+17&CJ>5$ ."
*">6!%%-#"$6-J.A#A!1L.+/1-!/*+/1$"<$*+!1$1"(--$-!/*CJ>5$*">6!%%
/1$"/!1+./!%%(<)+/3.*$:;
-#"$6-J.A#A5%!#$*J)!#M./$+17$"-+*$.=$/*L.+/1-AH.+/1-.==-$1J=".<)!-$
/+=."<%(<)+/3.*$:;
I
&&
0 0 %!>$"L.+/1-A ..*1"(--$--(55."1+/3CJ6..*-1"(#1("!%5!/$%-!55%+$*!1"+371!/3%$-
1.1"(--$-6+17*/!+%-A55".5"+!1$"..=#.,$"+/3A
/1$"/!1+./!%9($%!-.*$:9;
/1$"/!1+./!%/$"3>./-$",!1+./.*$:;
9 A 9 49
4 : ; /1$"/!1+./!%?+-1+/3(+%*+/3.*$:;
0 8 /1$"/!1+./!%6+<<+/3..%!/*5!.*$:;
0 8 & !1+./!%%$#1"+#!%.*$: ;
A9 99 4 9 4
I
4%$,!1.".*$-
4"$<.*$%<+M$E.(1%..MA#.<
AI
0 8 9 4@
0
9
J 9 I 8
4
4
DJDI A 9 4 9
9 4 8
9
IJ 4 9 9 8A0 8
80 99
4 8 9B
0 @ 4 0 994
9 8 8 8 89 8
4
9
4 9 4 9A
&&
9 99 4 C
0 0 984
4 0 @& A9 8 @
F9
4 4 4 @
8 9 4 9
@ 98
' 9 A
@ @
8
8 4
4
4 :; 0@A
4 0 'I 8 A
9 8 4 8
'
: 4 8;
4
4
0
0 8
8
4
0
0 8@
8
&
'
8
9 8
8 A 48
8
84
4 0
C 4
0 48 4
9 A9 DA
4A 9 @A4A4 A '
9 4 9 @ E
4 @ 'E @
0 F G
9 H A C&C 9
4 42
Page 802
I J&I J
F9
9 F9
F9
0 '
DCJDI
+37$-1 .(37$+%+/3
9 9
$!*$" $!*$"
I AJ
I AJ I A&J I A'J
I J I ''CJ I J
Page 803
I 'CJ I J 'CJ I J
I J I J 'I 'J
C9
0
DCJDI
I 'CJ I J 'CJ I J I CJCJ
I J I J 'I 'J
:4 ;
I J I ''CJ I J I 'CJ
9 9 $!*$" $!*$"
+37$-1 +*3$
+37$-1 .(37$+%+/3
I AJ I A&J
I AJ
I AJ
I A'J
' A 8
@ @
8
4 4 @2
C&C
0@A && &&
A 9 4"$<.*$%<+M$E.(1%..MA#.<
4 8 9
9
4
0@A
9
I I
&AI
I I I I
AI 9 I
A'I
AI
A&&I AI
AI I A'I
A&I
I
'I
9
I
'I
8
I DJDI
Page 804
8 I
' A 8
@ @
8
4 4 @2
C&C
0@A && &&
A 9 4"$<.*$%<+M$E.(1%..MA#.<
4 8 9
9 '
4
0@A
0
Page 805
C
C
' A 8
@ @
8
4 4 @2
C&C
0@A && &&
A 9 4"$<.*$%<+M$E.(1%..MA#.<
4 8 9
9
4
0@A
I CJ
I CJ
I &CJ I CJ I CJ I CJ 'I CJ
I &CJ 'CJ
'I
4
' & 4
I J'I J
F9
8 0 &I &JI J
&I &J'I J 'F9
0@A
I &CJ 'F9 4 C
&
I JI J
F9
'I 'JI J
I JI J F9
4 F9
I JI J 948 4
''F9 I JI J C 4
F9 I JI J
' A 8
F9
I J '
'I CJ
I I
@2
'I 'J'I 'J
'F9
& 99 I CJ
I JI J
&F9
I JI J 8
I JI J 4
&&
F9 F9 I JI J
F9
&C
8
0
I 'CJ I JI 'J
'F9
4"$<.*$%<+M$E.(1%..MA#.<
948
I JI J I J'I J
'F9 F9
4H 4
I &JI 'J
F9
I I
'4 &F9
I JI J
9
&F9
' '
'I &J&I J
F9 I
I 4
&& 9
8
0
I JI J
'F9 '
@ @
8
I JI J
F9 &I 'CJ 4
0@A
'I CJ I &'CJ
I 'CJ
A
4 8
9 9 DCJDI
'I 'CJ I 'CJ &I 'CJ I &J
I CJ I &CJ
'CJ CJ CJ
I &CJ I 'CJ
'I 'I 'I 'I I CJ 'I
' ' ' '
I 'CJ
9 4 9 '
J J
4 9 4 9 '
I J
I JI J
'I ' F9
'CJ
4 4
I JI J I JI J
F F9 &I &JI J F9 I
F9 9 4 9 ' 0
DCJDI '&I JI &J
'I ' &F9
F 9 4
80
DCJDI
I CJ
'I J'I J
&F9
I CJ
' 9 4
8 I JI &J
'I CJ
F9
9
I JI J
I 9 4
'F9
DCJDI
I CJ
&
I 9 4
&CJI &CJ CJ
08
I J'I 'J
F9 'I &J'I 'J
F9 9 4
'
9 4 CJ
I CJ
0
8 4 4
I JI J I JI J I JI J
I 'CJ
&F9 F9 F9
' 'I 4
&I JI J
'F9
' J4 CJ
I &CJ
9
I CJ
I JI J J4 CJ
F9
9
J49
' ' C&C 9
' '
I &CJ
I 'CJ I CJ 'I '&CJ I CJ J4 C
'I CJ 'I 'I 'I
'I CJ
I 'CJ I CJ I J I CJ
Page 806
&''.&"$$"+&"-
)"' *&"$
-
!
$%'$;'
)"'
$ ")$&%$
0#&1
,*$&+
)$,;&9
-$)&&)$""0$&'."
"))&&)$"
)"'
+-&0".'&1*9$&09$0
)$8
".''#"$$/ '.))$ #0##" $" *&"$-
/-"&0 $
'$-
, *$&+
$+&85425<=4>!244<?45
"& *'7#&
,)"
0$-0&"$8
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
0$-$8
+'&$-
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
"0$$$%&"'&$( (
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
&)&;0-;&0
)'".$&$"$))$"1
&''.&"$$"+&"-
$%'$;'."
).'&$0'.0$0&
'".'"'"&'"&
+&"$&')1-"
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
"$
*&'23 !
4564)6
! 7.8.0.
'"&'"
*&"$-
")'$-
")#&
#0#&00
"+1'"*&
#
&+-+)$ (
")"$
'$-
"*""+
*$&+
"& *'7#&
-))$"$).'
)'*$&+, ".''$/ $#
,)" #&+&&*&"$# /
-"&0 ""
$,&'"#.-"$'$&0-&"$*1$'$'+)&1
)$,
$&$&"$$%&"'&$( (
)$/
"#$"$$%&"'&$( (
0&"$)&-$
::::::::::
Page 807
!
)"'
".''$/ $#
#&+&&*&"$# #0#&00
"+$#
#&+
/-"&0
1'"*&
".$
#
"$+)
,
".''
'.+
".$
Page 808
'$-
)&&)$"
&+
."0$$$%&"'&$( (
".$
&+
,$0-$ "$
*&'23
4564)6
7.8.0.
-))$"$).' ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
'"&'" &)&;0-;&0 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 0#&1
"" )'".$&$"$))$"1 0$-$8
&''.&"$$"+&"- +'&$- )$,;&9
)$, $%'$;'." )$8
)$/ ).'&$0'.0$0&
'".'"'"&'"& 0$-0&"$8 $+&85425<=4>!244<?45
+&"$&')1-"
0&"$)&-$
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: &''.&"$$"+&"-
::::::::::
$%'$;'
4
:;
'J 4 4 C
9 C 9 C
99 4
9JGA
K 9 J 8
K 0
8 !"#$%& '
J
8 ()*+,+-+./ 0
.1
0@A
8
:;8 CK8KK
&AJ CK8KK84
: ;
84 @48
2./+/3 '
4 '
9
$-#"+51+./ 0
' A 8
'A'J
J $#1+./.6/-7+5 !/3$'' '
:9 A ;
A''J
/$%!>$"K6+*$CK1>5$3>5-(<-7$!17+/3!55%+$*5!"!%%$%1.?
6..*-1(*-K.A#A6+17'CK3!%,!/+L$*"..=+/3/!+%-K.A#A!1,$"1+#!%M.+/1-!/*&K
J
8 .A#A!1+/1$"<$*+!1$-1(*-!/*1.5!/*).11.<5%!1$-AI.+/1-.=3>5-(<-7$!17+/3
J )$%$=1(/1"$!1$*A?1$"+."#%!**+/31.)$!11!#7$*17".(37-7$!17+/31.-1(*-A
@2
4 8 /$%!>$"CK1>5$3>5-(<6!%%).!"*@6!1$" "$-+-1!/13>5-(<)!#N+/3
).!"*@."3>5-(<,$/$$")!-$!55%+$*5!"!%%$%."!1"+371!/3%$-1.-1(*-6+17*#.!1$* /1$"/!1+./!%(+%*+/3.*$:;
C4 J
/!+%-@&CK%./3@AK-7!/N@CK7$!*-@&K.A#A: ;
/1$"/!1+./!% $-+*$/1+!%.*$: ;
0 :9 A ;
!-$%!>$"CK1>5$3>5-(<6!%%).!"*!55%+$*!1"+371!/3%$-1.6..*"..=1"(--$-K /1$"/!1+./!%4$#7!/+#!%.*$:4;
.A#A6+17CK>5$ ."*">6!%%-#"$6-K.A#A9!#$%!>$"CK1>5$3>5-(<
6!%%).!"*."3>5-(<,$/$$")!-$!55%+$*!1"+371!/3%$-1.1"(--$-6+17&CK>5$ ."
*">6!%%-#"$6-K.A#A!1M.+/1-!/*+/1$"<$*+!1$1"(--$-!/*CK>5$*">6!%%
/1$"/!1+./!%%(<)+/3.*$:;
-#"$6-K.A#A5%!#$*K)!#N./$+17$"-+*$.=$/*M.+/1-AI.+/1-.==-$1K=".<)!-$
/+=."<%(<)+/3.*$:;
J
&&
0 0 %!>$"M.+/1-A ..*1"(--$--(55."1+/3CK6..*-1"(#1("!%5!/$%-!55%+$*!1"+371!/3%$-
1.1"(--$-6+17*/!+%-A55".5"+!1$"..=#.,$"+/3A
/1$"/!1+./!%9($%!-.*$:9;
/1$"/!1+./!%/$"3>./-$",!1+./.*$:;
9 A 9 49
4 : ; /1$"/!1+./!%?+-1+/3(+%*+/3.*$:;
0 8 /1$"/!1+./!%6+<<+/3..%!/*5!.*$:;
0 8 & !1+./!%%$#1"+#!%.*$: ;
A9 99 4 9 4
J
4%$,!1.".*$-
4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
AJ
0 8 9 4@
0
9
K 9 J 8
4
4
DKDJ A 9 4 9
9 4 8
9
JK 4 9 9 8A0 8
80 99
4 8 9B
0 @ 4 0 994
9 8 8 8 89 8
4
9
4 9 4 9A
&&
9 99 4 C
0 0 984
4 0 @& A9 8 @
F9
4 4 4 @
8 9 4 9
@ 98
' 9 A
@ @
8
8 4
4
4 :; 0@A
4 0 'J 8 A
9 8 4 8
'
: 4 8;
4
4 4 A9A 4
0 9 @'F9
'@&&&F9
0 9 @F9
0
8C : ; F9 F9
0 8
&F9 &F9
8
0 8@
&F9
&F9 8
4 D '
0D '@&&&F9
&
0D 'F9
A9A 9D A&A9A
D @&A9A E 9 0 D AE
8 84
E 9 0 D4E
9 8
8 A 48
4
8
4 0
C 4
0 48
9 A9 DA
4A 9 @A4A4 A '
9 4 9 @ G
4 @ 'G @
0 F H
9 I A 'CC 9
4 42
Page 809
J K&J K
F9
9 F9
F9
0 '
DCKDJ
+37$-1 .(37$+%+/3
9 9
$!*$" $!*$"
J AK
J AK J A&K J A'K
J K J ''CK J K
Page 810
J 'CK J K 'CK J K
J K J K 'J 'K
J 'CK
C9
0
DCKDJ
J 'CK J K 'CK J K J CKCK
J K J K 'J 'K
:4 ;
J K J ''CK J K J 'CK
9 9 $!*$" $!*$"
+37$-1 +*3$
+37$-1 .(37$+%+/3
J AK J A&K
J AK
J AK
J A'K
' A 8
@ @
8
4 4 @2
'CC 0@A && &&
A 9 4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
4 8 9
9
4
0@A
9
J J
&AJ
J J J J
AJ 9 J
A'J
AJ
A&&J AJ
AJ J A'J
A&J
J
'J
9
J
'J
8
J DKDJ
Page 811
8 J
' A 8
@ @
8
4 4 @2
'CC 0@A && &&
A 9 4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
4 8 9
9 '
4
0@A
0
Page 812
C
C
' A 8
@ @
8
4 4 @2
'CC 0@A && &&
A 9 4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
4 8 9
9
4
0@A
4 8
J9
'J9
'J
Page 813
A
A
' A 8
@ @
8
4 4 @2
'CC 0@A && &&
A 9 4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
4 8 9
9
4
0@A
J CK
J CK
J &CK J CK J CK J CK 'J CK
J &CK 'CK
'J
4
J ' & 4
J K'J K
F9
8 0 &J &KJ K
&J &K'J K 'F9
0@A
J &CK 'F9 4 C
&
J KJ K
F9
'J 'KJ K
J KJ K F9
4 F9
J KJ K 948 4
''F9 J KJ K C 4
F9 J KJ K
' A 8
F9
J K '
'J CK
J J
@2
'J 'K'J 'K
'F9
& 99 J CK
J KJ K
&F9
8
J KJ K 4
' &&
F9 J KJ K
F9
&CK
8
0
'J &CK
J 'CK J KJ 'K
''F9
4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
948
J KJ K J K'J K
'F9 F9
4I 4
J &KJ 'K
F9
J J
'4 &F9
J KJ K
9
&F9
' '
'J &K&J K
F9 J
J 4
&& 9
8
0
J KJ K
'F9 '
@ @
8
J KJ K
F9 &J 'CK 4
0@A
'J CK J &'CK
J 'CK
A
4 8
9 9 DCKDJ
'J 'CK J 'CK &J 'CK J CK
J CK J &CK
'CK CK CK
J &CK J 'CK
'J 'J 'J 'J J CK 'J
' ' ' ' K
4 9
9
9 4 9 '
K K
4 9 4 9 '
J K J K
J KJ K
F9
'J KJ K 4 4
''F9 J KJ K J KJ K
F F9 &J &KJ K F9 J
F9 9 4 9 '
DCKDJ
F 9 4
80
'J K'J K DCKDJ
&F9
J &CK 9 4
'
8 J KJ 'K
'J CK
F9
9
J KJ K
J 9 4
'F9
DCKDJ
J 'CK
&
J 9 4
&CKJ &CK CK
08
J K'J 'K
F9 'J &K'J 'K
F9 9 4
'
9 4 CK
J CK
0
8 4 4
J KJ K J KJ K J KJ K
J 'CK
&F9 F9 F9
' 'J 4
&J KJ K
'F9
' K4 CK
J &CK
9
J CK
J KJ K K4 CK
F9
9
K49
' ' 'CC 9
' '
J &CK
J 'CK J CK 'J '&CK J CK K4 C
'J CK 'J 'J 'J
J 'CK J CK J K J CK 'J CK
Page 814
4
C +37$-1 +*3$
9 & J A&K
&J CK
0@A
9C
90J'
' A 8
$!*$"
&J A&K
4
@2
J 'CK
9
J 'CK
4 8 2 2
&&
K
J ''CK
9 &
$!*$"
4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
'J CK
J AK
&
J CK
9
JK J CK J K
9 9 9 9 9
J AK
4
&& 9
C0 DCKDJ
@ @
8
4
0@A
9 04 4 49
A
4 8
+37$-1 +*3$
9 J A&K
+37$-1 +*3$ %!>
J CK
J A&K .
J 'CK
J 'K
&
9 9J
J 'K
&J CK
9 &
'CK
9
J 'CK
&J CK
$!*$" KA J 'K $!*$"
&J CK
J CK
&J AK 4 8 9
&J AK
'
J CK J CK
9 4 9 4 CKDJ
J CK
J K CK
J CK
K
J CK
J CK
J K
J 'CK J 'CK
CK
J CK CK
J CK
K
J
J 'CK
& $!*$" $!*$"
J
4 & J AK J AK
'J CK
J K
9 $!*$"
J AK
$!*$"
J AK
J K J K J K J K
J K J K KK
J K J K
9 K K 9 9
K 8 AK J AK
9 9 K K 9 9 'CK
J AK K J A
9 89 4 8
C0 DCKDJ
9 C 0 DCKDJ
&
'CC 9
Page 815
K CK
J CK J 'CK
J K J J K J 'K
9 9
+37$-1 +*3$
$!*$"
$!*$"
J AK
J AK &J A&K J A&K
J K J 'CK &J CK
J K
J CK
'C
&
4 &
K9
4
4
9 8 9
'
4
0
K9
4
Page 816
J K
DCKDJ
9
%!>
.
&
J CK
'J CK
J K
9 9 $!*$"
J AK
J AK
' A 8
@ @
8
4 4 @2
'CC 0@A && &&
A 9 4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
4 8 9
9
4
0@A
Page 817
Page 818
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
61 item(s)